Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.E- Community Development ORDINANCE (ID# 1546) DOC ID: 1546 Al CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO—REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Municipal Code From: Margo Wheeler M/CC Meeting Date: 07/16/2012 Prepared by: Shirley Robinson, (909) 384- 5057 Dept: Community Development Ward(s): All Subject: An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino Amending San Bernardino Municipal Code (Development Code) Chapter 19.02.060, Establishment of Land Use Zoning Districts to Add Transit Overlay District (TD) and Adding Chapter 19.19A to Establish the Transit Overlay District Pertaining to Development Standards and Design Guidelines. (FINAL READING) (At the Meeting of February 6, 2012, Item Continued to March 5, 2012; Item Continued to May 7, 2012; Item Continued to June 18, 2012; Item Continued to July 2, 2012; Item Laid Over to July 16, 2012.) Financial Impact: None. Motion: Adopt Ordinance. Synopsis of Previous Council Action: On May 7, 2012, staff requested that this matter be continued to June 18, 2012, to allow additional time frame to complete tribal consultations pursuant to Senate Bill 18 - Tribal Consultation Guidelines. As of May 17, 2012, all of the SB 18 requirements within the Tribal Consultation Guidelines have been met. The details of SB 18 are discussed in the General Plan Amendment(Case#GPA 12-01) staff report. On June 18, 2012, the Mayor and Common Council heard a presentation of the Development Code Amendment from The Planning Center, opened the meeting to take Public Testimony, and Mayor and Common Council provided staff with comments and asked questions related to the Development Code Amendment. The Mayor and Common Council continued the Agenda Item to July 2, 2012. There were ten (10) proponents who gave public testimony and four (4) opponents (See Attachment M). The Mayor and Common Council also provided comments and concerns. In addition, four letters and one emails received on June 18, 2012, Mayor and Common Council meeting are included in Attachment O of this staff report. Some Concerns Received on Response June 18, 1 Project will bring low-income housing The proposed TD Overlay does not have any provisions to mandate, require or facilitate new low-income housing. The proposed TD Overlay does not allow any new residential, multi- Updated:7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland AI 1546 family residential or other residential uses where not currently allowed. Uses deemed nonconforming; will they have to Existing uses deemed nonconforming may continue to do business close business? with no date to be removed. If a business moves or vacates the property, a business owner has up to three (3) years (36 or more calendar months) to re-establish a new business in the space once used by a nonconforming use. The TD Overlay expands the number of permitted uses to allow more pedestrian oriented uses such as: Convenience stores, Dry cleaners, Educational services, Mobile vendors, Neighborhood grocery stores, and Parking structures. Concern about requiring existing shopping The proposed subsection (Section 19.19A.080 F.) has been centers with parking out in the front to push the amended to replace the word "shall" with the word "should" to parking in back of buildings. The police will not allow the option for parking to be designed at the front of be able to see in the back of the building. In commercial properties. (Reference TD Draft Ordinance(Redline)— addition, there was a concern with Stepback's Attachment Al) requirement. Staff is recommending that proposed subsection (Section 19.19A.070 (Residential Transition Standards) has been amended to replace the word "shall" with the word "should" to allow the option for a Stepback to be part of a building design. Other issues, separate from the proposed TD Overlay Ordinance, related to spending objections on spending City funds on sbX project, concerns with not addressing existing business issues during the construction of the sbX, existing bus ridership and use of Measure I and other funds. In addition, concerns were raised about whether or not there were sufficient funds for the sbX project to be completed. Staff is following up with Omnitrans construction Planning Manager in addressing the concerns related to noise, construction complaints, and possible funding issues raised during the hearing about sbX. During all of the neighborhood meetings held for the TD Overlay, staff did make sure that representatives from Omnitrans were present to address concerns voiced by those in attendance at the meeting. Staff anticipates a letter from Omnitrans that will address the current funding status of the sbX project and a list of complaints filed with Omnitrans to date. On June 26, 2012 the City received Omnitrans response to the City's concerns (see Attachment P). To address Measure I funds, staff prepared a memorandum pertaining to when the law was passed and extended, where in the law does it limit expenditures, which was established as the authority to make expenditures and what can be spent as allowed by the voters. Finally, the memorandum covers local authorities' roles with Measure I funds (Attachment N). Background: Development Code Amendment (DCA) No. 12-01 is a proposal to amend Chapter 19.02, Basic Provisions, to add Transit Overlay District (TD) and add Section 19.19A, Transit Overlay District to provide a regulatory framework for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) in the form of development standards and design guidelines around future transit stops (Attachment A). Transit Overlay District (TD): The City has developed a set of zoning regulations surrounding `.., thirteen (13) future transit stations that fall within the designated overlay district. The regulations Updated: 7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland Al Packet Pg.73 1546 are accompanied by a set of development standards and design guidelines that are flexible enough to allow property owners and developers to express their vision while maintaining a consistency in urban form to encourage an attractive multi-modal atmosphere. The TD zoning regulations would apply to the establishment of all new structures and uses within the boundaries of the 13 Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) station areas and future downtown multi-modal transit center. The City would maintain the existing land use and zoning designations of the affected parcels in place under the proposed project. New development standards include but are not limited to: • New build-to-line setback requirements to allow buildings to be placed closer to street frontage with parking at the rear of the site along designated street areas; • Building heights are set differently within each proposed transit stop type with upper story step-back requirements and two story maximum building heights when adjacent to single- family residential zone; • Building ground floor transparency percentage requirements added by transit station area; • Building entrance orientation requirements set for building's main entrance to face Kendall Drive and E Street frontages; residential transition standards when projects are adjacent to single-family residential are set to maximum of two stories or 30 feet; • Reduced on-site parking requirements are provided to encourage the use of the adjacent transit district facility; • One bicycle parking space provided for every 10 automobile parking spaces provided; • Street block maximum lengths,with some minor exceptions,reduced to 400 feet; and • General design guidelines with residential and commercial site planning, architectural design, parking design requirements, and street sidewalk landscape recommendations. An addition to Section 19.19A.040 General Provisions includes new subsection "D" Public Facilities. This section was added to address the unique use of parks, transit station and centers, and other public facilities. In this section, The Planning Center mentions school districts which are already exempt from the City Development Code requirements by State Law. However, it is mentioned as an example of unique public facility. A similar exemption within the Development Code relates to certain signs installed by recognized civic group, flags, ATM kiosk sign and official &legal notices by a court or government agency. The specific language added to the TD Ordinance reads as follows: "D. Public Facilities. Public facilities such as parks, public schools, and transit centers and stations, and other public facilities due to their unique use and special function may deviate from the provisions of this chapter upon approval of a Design Review Development Permit." The other revisions are minor in nature made by the City Attorney's office to clarify the organization of the proposed "Design Guidelines," cleaning the language up with grammar edits Updated: 7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland Al 1546 or adding clarifying words, and adding the "Development Review Committee" as an approving body in addressing Interpretations in Section G19.19A.100 C. of the draft TD Overlay Ordinance. Draft Transit District Overlay Ordinance: Attachment-1 of Attachment J, the Draft Ordinance, includes the proposed TD Overlay Ordinance for review. City of San Bernardino Anprovals 12/05/05 Resolution No. 2005-412 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council adopting in concept the locally preferred alternative (LPA) for the "E" Street Transit Corridor and Transit Supportive uses adjacent to the LPA Stations. 07/21/08 Resolution No. 2008-297 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino approving and authorizing the City Manager of the City of San Bernardino to execute a Memorandum of Understanding by and among the City of San Bernardino City the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino Agency Omnitrans and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) State College Uptown Central City North Central City South Southeast Industrial Park and Tri City Redevelopment Project Areas. 07/21/08 CDC 2008-27 Resolution of the Community Development Commission of the O City of San Bernardino approving and authorizing the Interim Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino Agency to execute a Memorandum of Understanding by and among the City of San Bernardino City the Agency Omnitrans and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) State College Uptown Central City North Central City South Southeast Industrial Park and Tri City Redevelopment Project Areas. 3/16/09 Resolution No. 2009-60 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council authorizing the submittal of a Caltrans Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) grant application for the development of a TOD Overlay District. 09/21/09 Resolution No. 2009-326 was approved by Mayor and Common Council authorizing the City Manager to execute a Master Cooperative Agreement by and among the City of San Bernardino, the Redevelopment Agency, and Omnitrans for the development of"E" Street Corridor sbX Bus Rapid Transit Project and finalizing the station locations. Approval includes: "Whereas, on September 21,the Mayor and Common Council as a Responsible Agency under CEQA, independently reviewed, analyzed and exercised independent judgment in the consideration of the Mitigated Negative Declaration as previously prepared and adopted by Omnitrans." 09/21/09 Resolution No. 2009-327 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council approving an agreement for services with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., to Updated:7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland AI Packet Pg. 75 1546 O provide on-call plan review services for the sbX "E" Street Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project. 9/21/09 Resolution No. CDC/2009-55 was approved by the Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the Interim Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino to execute a Master Cooperative Agreement by and among the City of San Bernardino, The Redevelopment Agency and Omnitrans for the development of the "E" Street Corridor sbX Bus Rapid Transit Project. 10/22/09 Resolution No. 2009-342 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council for a contract with Caltrans accepting funding ($250,000) for planning and implementation of transit-oriented development(Attachment B). 09/07/10 Resolution No. 2010-50 was approved by the Community Development Commission (CDC), authorizing the Interim Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency to execute a Professional Services Agreement between the Agency and The Planning Center to provide consultant services for the preparation of the TOD District for the City in the amount of$300,000. Chronology of Citywide and Neighborhood Meetings for TD Overlay 5/5/11 Guests of Neighborhood Cluster Association Presidents Meeting - Planning Center, Arellano Associates and City Staff attended morning meeting; ASA j Charter School -3512 North E Street, San Bernardino. ��v� 515111 Guests of Mt. Vernon Neighborhood Watch Meeting - Arellano Associates and City Staff attended evening meeting; held at Robert Ballard Rehabilitation Hospital Cafeteria -1760 W. 16th Street, San Bernardino; a total of approximately 12 community members were in attendance. 6/15/11 Citywide Open House Meeting held by The Planning Center, Arellano and Associates and EDA Staff, Cal-State San Bernardino-Obsershaw Dining Room; a total of 31 community members participated; newspaper publications, local cable slates, E-blast, website, Public Service Announcements, and Media Release (Attachment Q. 6/16/11 Citywide Open House Meeting held by The Planning Center, Arellano and Associates and EDA Staff; Redevelopment Agency Meeting Room -201 North E Street, San Bernardino; a total of 18 community members attended; newspaper publications and local cable (Attachment Q. 7/7/11 Guests of San Bernardino Arrowhead Rotary Club - Arellano and Associates assisted Mayor's City Staff in Presentation; a total of approximately 20 Rotary Members and Guests were in attendance; San Bernardino Public Golf Course in San Bernardino - 1494 S. Waterman Ave., San Bernardino. 9/29/11 Neighborhood Meeting held at Verdemont Community Center - 3664 Little Updated:7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland AI 1546 Q League Drive, San Bernardino; a total of 45 community members attended; public notice mailed to property owners and business owners (Attachment D). 10/12/11 Guest at San Bernardino Sunset Rotary Club - City Planning Staff made a presentation; a total of 35 Rotary members and guests present; meeting held at Castaways Restaurant in San Bernardino - 670 Kendall Dr., San Bernardino. 10/24/11 Neighborhood Meeting held at Shandin Hills Middle School - 4301 Little Mountain Drive San Bernardino; a total of 27 community members attended; public notice mailed to property owners and business owners (Attachment D). 11/3/11 Guest at Arrowhead Farms Neighborhood Association Meeting - City Planning Staff made a presentation; a total of 9 people in attendance; meeting held at Newmark Elementary School-4121 3`d Avenue, San Bernardino. 11/09/11 Neighborhood Meeting held at San Bernardino Unified School District - Community Room - 777 N. "F" Street, San Bernardino; a total of 10 community members attended; public notice mailed to property owners and business owners (Attachment D). 11/17/11 Neighborhood Meeting held at City Hall Multi-Purpose Meeting Room in Basement- 300 N. "D" Street, San Bernardino; a total of 12 community members attended; public notice mailed to property owners and business owners. 11/30/11 Subsequent meeting that was planned was cancelled. No notices had been mailed. 12/13/11 Subsequent meeting that was planned was cancelled. No notices had been mailed. 01/04/12 Subsequent meeting that was planned was cancelled. No notices had been mailed. 01/04/12 Neighborhood Meeting held with Community Builders Group - Meeting held at First Congregational United Church of Christ located at 3041 Sierra Way; Approximately 30 members of this group were in attendance. 5/16/12 Guest at San Bernardino Soroptimist Club; City Planning Staff and Omnitrans representative made a presentation; a total of 11 in attendance; meeting held at Norman Feldheym Public Library in the City of San Bernardino - 555 W. 6n' Street, San Bernardino. 5/24/12 Neighborhood Meeting to be held at San Bernardino High School Cafeteria - 1850 N. "E" Street, San Bernardino; a total of 10 people were in attendance (property owners); meeting held for MarshallP'E" Street & Highland/ "E" Street Neighborhoods. 6/7/12 Neighborhood Meeting to be held at City Hall Council Chambers - 300 N. "D" Street, San Bernardino; City Staff and Omnitrarts Staff present; a total of 17 people (business owners and property owners) were in attendance; Meeting held © for North Mall Way and `B" Street, & Hunts, Carnegie and Tippecanoe and Hospitality Neighborhoods. Updated: 7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland Al Packet Pg. 77 1546 Note: A total of 15 public outreach meetings were held reaching approximately 287 people,with an average of 19.13 people per meeting. It was noted that 16 meetings were held at the June 18, 2012 Mayor and Common Council meeting. This is a correction to that statistic as the number of meetings excludes Planning Commission meeting held on February 22, 2012,which was noticed in a 1/8 page ad published in the San Bernardino Sun February 11, 2012. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) An Addendum with Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan to the previously certified City of San Bernardino 2005 General Plan Update (SBGPU EIR) and Associated Specific Plans Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2004111132, has been prepared. It serves as the environmental review for the proposed Transit Overlay District(TD) zoning designation and associated development standards and design guidelines for areas surrounding the City's transit stations (proposed project). The TD and its regulations are proposed in order to implement the City's General Plan policies promoting transit-oriented development. This draft Addendum with Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan is the result of an evaluation of the proposed project in relation to the previously prepared and certified EIR. The evaluation, contained in the addendum, determined that the proposed project does not contain changes and/or additional details that warrant a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR as described in Sections 15162 and 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines. Upon completion of the Addendum, the City of San Bernardino has determined on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record that the proposed project does not trigger additional CEQA Review. (Attachment F). ANALYSIS Public Outreach: There have been two public outreach efforts prior to drafting of the proposed TD ordinance. The first public outreach effort consisted of two community open house meetings held on June 15 and 16, 2011. All of the transit district station areas were considered in these noticed public meeting. The approach and summary findings are below: Open House included three public outreach stations: • The Community Meetings solicited public feedback by providing a looping PowerPoint presentation for participants to view; • Preference Survey of development types (density and commercial types) was administered; and • Station Map Boards were provided to solicit input within the identified stations throughout the 15.7 mile Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route that extends between the City of San Bernardino (13 Transit Stops) and Loma Linda(3 Stops). Final Report by Arellano and Associates concluded "as a whole the comments received during the community meetings indicate that the community has a deep desire to see the City improved and enhanced. Respondents would like more amenities and enhancements and a higher and better mix of uses including a variety of neighborhood serving retail uses. Based on the results Updated: 7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland Al PacketPg. 78 1546 of the Preference Survey, the respondents have a desire to see higher-density developments. A number of well-informed meeting attendees did share their enthusiasm for the higher-density developments and related improvements associated with transit-oriented developments as a solution to improving the City of San Bernardino." The detailed final report is available online for review at the Community Development Department's Planning Division TOD webpage: http://www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us/civica/filebank/"blobdload.asp?BloblD=12551>. The second approach comprised of neighborhood community meetings. The property owners and registered business owners within and adjacent to the preliminary transit district boundaries were notified of the meeting held at local community facilities or schools. In addition, local churches, neighborhood watch groups, local Rotary Chapter, Indian Tribes, and Neighborhood Cluster Associations were notified of the meetings. The neighborhood meetings were held for each of the proposed TD Overlay boundaries. The 13 TD Overlay areas include: 1. Palm Ave./Kendall Drive; 2. University and Northpark; 3. Kendall Drive and Little Mountain Drive; 4. Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills; 5. E Street and Marshall Blvd.; 6.E Street and Highland Ave.; 7. E Street and Baseline; 8. E Street and Court Lane; C 9. E Street and Rialto; 10. E Street and North Mall Way; 11. Hunts Lane and Hospitality Lane; 12. Carnegie Drive and Hospitality Lane; and 13. Tippecanoe Ave. and Hospitality Lane. On May 24 and June 7, 2012, staff rescheduled and held two neighborhood meetings. Staff provided handouts clarifying location of proposed TD Overlay boundaries with a table explaining what is currently permitted and disallowed in commercial zones and what the proposed TD Overlay is proposing to permit and disallow at both meetings. The handouts appeared to clarify concerns about permitted uses in their neighborhood. In addition, at both meetings the audience was able to ask questions about sbX project presently in construction from Omnitrans Transit Agency staff representatives. The planning handouts are available online for review at Community Development Department's Planning Division TOD webpage: http://www.ci.san- bernardino.ca.us/cityhall/community development/planning/transit oriented development tod .as >. The comments received from the participants of the neighborhood meetings were considered in the drafting of the proposed Transit District (TD) Boundaries. The proposed TD Boundaries have been developed to address the many concerns received during the public outreach efforts. This includes excluding any R-1 zone (Attachments E and G). Staff used a '/a mile distance from the bus rapid transit location in reducing the preliminary draft boundaries shown at the neighborhood meetings (September 29, 2011; October 24, 2011;November 9 and 30, 2011; May 24,2012; and June 7, 2012). Updated: 7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland AI Pac + g. 79 1546 In addition, the comments received from the participants of the neighborhood meetings were considered in the drafting of the proposed text amendment. The proposed development standards and design guidelines have been developed to address the many concerns received during the public outreach efforts. In addition, the proposed TD Overlay does include the changes outlined in the table within the "Background" section of this staff report. The amendments are included in Section 19.19A.080 F (Parking) and Section 19.19A.040, Table 19A.01 (General Provisions) of the draft TD Overlay Code. Please reference Attachment 1 of Attachment J for changes to the proposed TD Overlay Code. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan. I The proposed Development Code Amendment would provide an update to the Development Code to provide for future transit supportive land use throughout the City consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies: Policy 2.4.6: "Work with Omnitrans to explore initiatives that promote redevelopment near transit stops in order to encourage transit ridership, reduce vehicular trips, improve air quality, and improve traffic congestion." Goal 6.6: "Promote a network of multi-modal transportation facilities that are safe, efficient, and i O connected to various points of the City and the region." Policy 6.6.1: "Support the efforts of regional, state and federal agencies to provide additional local and express bus service in the City." Policy 6.6.2: "Create a partnership with Omnitrans to identify public transportation infrastructure needs that improve mobility. Polio: "In cooperation with Omnitrans, require new development to provide transit facilities, such as bus shelters and turnouts, as necessary and warranted by the scale of the development." Policy 6.6.4: "Ensure accessibility to public transportation for seniors and persons with disabilities. Polite 6.6.5: "In cooperation with Omnitrans, explore methods to improve the use, speed, and efficiency for transit services." Policy 6.6.6: "Support and encourage the provision of a range of paratransit opportunities to complement bus and rail service for specialized transit needs." Policy 6.6.10: "Consider the provision of incentives, such as reduced parking standards and density/intensity bonuses, to those projects near transit stops that include transit-friendly uses such as child care, convenience retail and housing. Updated:7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland AI Packet Pg. 80 1546 Policy 6.7.2: "Coordinate with SANBAG, SCAG, the County and other regional, state or federal agencies and the railroads regarding plans for the provision of passenger, commuter, and high- speed rail service. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed amendment would assist in improving economic mobility from new transit service, improve air quality by reducing automobile trips and their carbon emissions, increase housing choices, assist in the affordability of housing, and provide walking and biking health benefits for residents throughout the City that will promote public health and safety. The proposed transit overlay district would bring many benefits and convenient community life for residents and the City including and not limited to: Economic: • Increase property value -would revitalize the area within Y< mile of the station. • Decrease infrastructure costs -would reduce infrastructure costs due to compact and infill development that can use existing capacity and would not use as much capacity as auto based development. • Reduce household spending-would reduce auto,parking and travel costs Environmental: • Improve air quality and energy consumption would decrease auto trips lead to lower emissions. • Conservation of land and open space - would be compact developments and therefore, consume less land than lower-intensity, auto-oriented development. • Decrease congestion-would decrease driving resulting in reduced congestion. Social: • Increase housing and employment choices - would provide a diversity of housing and employment types in conveniently close proximity to the transit station. • Health benefits -would provide more opportunities for walking and bicycling. • Enhance sense of community - would bring more people and businesses closer in a pedestrian environment. Allowing the proposed amendment for Transit Overlay District will serve the public interest and convenience, and would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: Planning Commission Hearing January 18, 2012: Notice of the public hearing of this item was published in a 1/8 page advertisement in the San Bernardino County Sun on January 7, 2012. Please reference Attachment H. Mayor and Common Council Hearing February 6,2012: Notice of the public hearing of this item was published in a 1/8 page advertisement in the San Bernardino County Sun on January 25, 2012. Please reference Attachment I. Updated: 7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland Al 6.E 1546 CONCLUSION: The purpose and the provisions of the proposed Development Code Amendment satisfy all Findings of Fact required for approval. RECOMMENDATION: That the hearing be closed and the Mayor and Common Council adopt Ordinance for First Reading laying over the Ordinance for final adoption: 1) Adopt the Addendum to the certified San Bernardino General Plan Updated and Associated Specific Plans EIR SCH#2004 1 1 1 1 32; and 2) Approve Development Code Amendment No. 12-01 based on the Findings of Fact contained in the staff report and draft ordinance (Attachment J). City Attorney Review: Supporting Documents: Attachment Al- TD Draft Ordinance (REDLINE)_6-19-12 (PDF) Attachment-A- Resolution No. 2009-60 (PDF) Attachment-13 - Resolution No. 2009-342 (PDF) Attachment C -Meeting Notes June 15 and 16, 2011 (Reference) (PDF) Attachment D - Meeting Notes- Sept 29 2011, Oct 24 2011 and Nov 09 2011 (Reference) (PDF) Attachment E -Transit Station Areas Chart (PDF) Attachment F -Addendum to Certified SBGPU EIR(PDF) Attachment G-Changes to Existing Zoning with TD Code (PDF) Attachment H -Notice of Public Hearing (PDF) Attachment I-Notice of Public Hearing (PDF) Attachment J -Ordinance Draft (DOC) Attachment 1 (Draft TD Overlay Ordinance)_Updated Clean Version-6-19-12 (PDF) Attachment K Comments_San Manuel Band-04-18-12 (PDF) Attachment L SB-18 Memo on Addendum to SBGPU EIR 060412 (PDF) Attachment M- Summary of Public hiput_MCC Meeting June 18 (PDF) Updated: 7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland Al 1546 Attachment N -Measure I Snapshot Memo (PDF) Attachment O -Letters &Email Received (PDF) Attachment P Omni-Trans_Letter Received-6-26-12 (PDF) Attachment Q - Support Letter (PDF) Staff Report-MCC 6-18-2012 (REDLINED)(PDF) I I Updated: 7/12/2012 by Linda Sutherland AI Packet Pg. 83 I I 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al //►�1 San Bernardino Development Code l ) June FebFuaFy januaFy 9,2012 DRAFT N r Article i-General Provisions c z 19.02.o6o ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND USE ZONING DISTRICTS E Transit Overlay District(TD) d E Q Article z- Land Use Zoning Districts 0 U 1q.tgA—Transit Overlay District(TD) c d Sections E Q. 0 19.19A.olo Purpose w 19.19A.o2o Applicability 19.19A.03o Transit Station Area Types No No 19.19A.04o General Provisions v 19.19A.050 Building Form and Placement Standards 0 19.19A.060 Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses 'N T m 19.19A.070 Residential Transition Standards w N 19.19A.080 Parking C6 I 19.19A.o90 Subdivision Standards rol w G19.19A.1oo Design Guidelines z J G19.19A.110 District Image w G19.19A.12o Transit Oriented Design m v G19.19A.130 Site Planning and Architectural Design c G19.19A.140 Parking Design `a O G19.19A.15o Landscape Design « m D 1 I- Q c m E t v m Q c d E 0 0 ea « Q v� 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al 19.19A.010 Purpose The Transit Overlay District(TD)and its regulations are established in order to implement the City's General Plan policies promoting transit-oriented development within San Bernardino.The intent of the TD is to allow and encourage an appropriate N mix and intensity of land uses in a compact pattern around transit stations that will foster transit usage,create new opportunities for economic growth,encourage infill o Z and redevelopment,reduce dependency on the automobile,improve air quality,and promote high quality,interactive neighborhoods.The regulations and guidelines of aci this chapter are based upon the following transit-oriented development area E principles,consistent with the California Transit Village Development Planning Act of c v 1994: E Q t. An attractive transit station with surrounding pedestrian amenities as the focus of the transit-oriented development area. O U z. An appropriate mix and intensity of uses such as office,retail,entertainment, c m residential,and recreational facilities that support transit use and are designed for E convenient access by transit riders,pedestrians,and bicyclists. o d 3. Inviting and pedestrian-focused open spaces on both public and private y properties,such as smaller public pocket parks,civic plazas,outdoor dining areas, ❑ common greens,and other types of urban spaces. v m 4. A walkable and bikeable area with pleasant connections linking transit stations with businesses and neighborhoods. c 5. An interconnected street and non-vehicular network where walkways,bikeways, p landscaping,and other streetscape amenities receive priority. w 19.i9A.ozo Applicability N The Transit Overlay District(TD)applies to transit station areas within San Bernardino.The TO establishes standards and regulations beyond those required by the underlying base zones.Whenever the requirement of the TD conflicts with the tO� underlying base zone,the requirement of the TD shall govern. w Z_ As transit service is expanded within San Bernardino,additional areas may be _J O designated as TD within the city.TD boundaries may also be expanded over time as LU development becomes more transit oriented.Boundary adjustments within a half -- mile of a transit station may be proposed by an applicant and approved at the cc'i discretion of the Community Development Director.The boundaries for each station area are established below,as shown in Figures i to 13. c The TD standards apply to the establishment of all new structures and uses within O the boundaries of the TD.Existing structures and uses those are inconsistent with the m O 2 F Q C d E L V f0 Q C d E r U Q B:E.a ATTACHMENT Al TD standards may be maintained,repaired,altered,and expanded only as allowed by Chapter 19.62(Nonconforming Structures and Uses). Figure i.Kendall Drive and Palm Avenue Transit Station Area 0 9 M N `S 2F "• � �, fps. �°�� er r K 9 Z S/� !. j 4) 4„ q� d eyes �� d° w, � E v Beim �o C � n W c E a �60` d a 0 \ � d 2 to d c \\ \ f c � fz O \\\ i kaatlaii �,R 1°v r N Transit Station ••SWIG Line se (see section 19n9A.0{0) t W Z J O W d r C G_ L 0 A L Q 3 1.- Q c d E L V N Q w C d E t u Q B:E.a ATTACHMENT Al Figure z.Kendall Drive and Little Mountain Drive Transit Station Area N oy Afi/pp CRS y'� Chi G ��Y YDQ 4 Q a a V Z � � s C V E E L I I c > Vl/ L r > 0 I � > OTransk Su ••• BWld4o N Isoa-.,��t 10.1VA.0/e) C6 W Z J 0 W x CD U C R G_ L 0 F L Q 4 I- Q c v E U U m Q c a E L U w Q PacketPg. 87 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Figure 3.Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills Drive Transit Station Area z ... asp N LM1arty w � A cpn O Z _ m au E m � v / c m E CL / O JJ > �C to O r N N TWO Statim i 1117 ••aulld t4 Lk, i" N �iw ralmn 111.1 W1.W0) � r tD W Z J W N V C C C 'O L O to L 0 5 � Q c w E z U to Q C N E r A U a Packet Pg. 88 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Figure 4.E Street and Marshall Boulevard Transit Station Area U 8 G 3 ]]N 6 6 ��-P o (f.omPson Z C 0 E r LE 351h o 3atn 3 v 1 - rindBeoos A o E _O Etl90monl r - ' 6 > m.mbae ;��� MersM1all BussaY I n > N a 319 'O ' E 31 st r 4 V ' W O A CO—a > 29m r r W Z J W C d C C C_ L 0 A L 6 F- Q c m E r v m z Q C c d E r v O � Q Packet Pg.89 ATTACHMENT Al Figure 5.E Street and Highland Avenue Transit Station Area 28m N 6 281n •–• JO CIA Alexvber v, a Arewnder J m V1h 27th 29rn 6 LouNand w Z aurtw tl 26m 26ln 2SIh � 26P I--, 2515 C 25M 25m x h I 25th C m 24th 24M L—II 241h 24tn 0 t, 3 y u' x E 23rd 20e II--.ufa-------I-- I Q Hi9ltlantl I -- L f�. .. I gMand C U 21st LJ 21st 21st I L C i IJ a , E d 20m r--I 20m -- — 21 s1 ' E Letn06H I 20M 0 0 LLt _ L I 19H 9m I: r— o Ime ( I 19th .. I j ao 17M I- N 17th IM – Trenlan ` x tfim Ll—J p 16th 16m C 0 _vans Evans Evans - Mn ISm o. 15m N O?ranet Station T 14m-_ Build to Line (see section 19.19A.040) to W 2 J O W K d r 10 A C L 0 A L D O 7 Q r C V E r U m r c m E s u m Packet Pg. 90 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Figure 6.E Street and Baseline Avenue Transit Station Area _.. II "IVth 17111 ` Trenton nln ..,. ntn ^ O Z L._ l5tn - �y o 16m - loth N ;I r vans Evans Evans jJlsm a- �° Ism Z troll Magnolia ; y' Magnolia M89noba C m r m E la9nola u 149, v m Idm c r °, d Home waeasM1 E m lot. i U r 6aseime I__ n �.... :. ,$asgl ne d L ^ 07.77 Orange O E w s _ 9 1IXr ' Ilm I 11m ' o w Ol ve _ Olrve i w Olrve I n Ol va to »J E I '.. I a Z. m I _�'J � I ...... a temple Temple I '�u ; Temple I I ran r Union I L N OTtansrt Station •Build to Line N 'L LllLW➢ L1J_LLL� � .(Gaa sacllnn 1949A.04o) r W Z J O W d C C A C L 0 R L 0 8 F- r ¢ d E M U R a r d E s v © s1°. ATTACHMENT Al Figure 7.University Avenue and North Parkway Transit Station Area L O Z .-r 0E east ?• ,, �' ` Calllornle Stab OnlvvsnY y^ f San S.rnualnn E eOtlai ' f �'..,.,. No�Cpsd O \ate 01. 11dN11Bf d. L ay v �Cl' 8 °0✓ �p� 5 `a O Gen . b v Y Transit StanOn V T 'to U aft N aulld to Una � (sae aa00un 19.16A.040j W Z J LU W R' d U C A C 0 A D 13 9 F Q C 01 E L O W f: Q r C d E L O Q Packet Pg.92 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Figure 8.E Street and North Mall Way Transit Station Area C Z v E coas - O U it nMep Wed 1 r _I E a v - 0 y a1 0[anBe Snew 1 7 LO y y a > iJ , d _ O TfenaR Station u N � (see aedlBn 19.19A.1140) � r W 2 J O W Q) C1 C c L 0 A L 10 Q c d E s v m a c d E to t u © Zr Q Packet Pg. 93 ATTACHMENT Al Figure 9.E Street and Court Street Transit Station StatiO onArea N a� T z M; t7. via _ w.� E .a c Nil , m ___° _ 4) Ill➢e. ' 1 soN e 0 i U 1 Cnmch 1 c 1�L�llLJ T w 1 > -I C 1 � d i��J COUrt 1 co 3rd )`.. 3td — I Main O 3 v Bing > u B a Nng °o d F�altO O Trans t Station I N •_Build to Una (see section,10.19 W Z J w W Of v U c r c O m O a « C d E s u m z; a c d E s v m Q Packet Pg. 94 ATTACHMENT Al Figure to.E Street and Rialto Avenue Transit Station Area a� N r7 -llJ Z w $ „ a) n d I'�/JIB E Main ; W 1 King (. 1f U a ® ---------- I f :I Congress I C I ` JJulia > _ congress I d Athol a I� ColumOie "I - o ''fL-7n�-If I a Cluster m o 10 I o 7 I a m Valley I R Velarde c i z c n m — c m r o w C BIICII Q 6 f N Q Oak N ti � - rensil Sletlon T'J LLLJJJ •^Build-la Line '/)r fl��--`,�� i� •• (sae section 19.19A.060) r W Z J O W d U G A C R O 1] tz r a d E L U W Q C 0) E L U © w Q 6.Eca ATTACHMENT Al Figure it.Hospitality Lane and Hunts Lane Transit Station Area _ �I O L. E Z o G E MAY E - -T li -.-..E ArCOM1 O. §gyp O `; .... a a d ' 9teeA a^rerq " n c arasa _S � o Carmine W 00 Center 0 W Transit Station r e se Line (s N If'C\ � (sae section 19.19A.040) .., C6 r V7 W 2 J W d U C R C 'O 0 A D 13 �- Q c d E t U Q w C E L U Q Packet P9.96 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al © Figure 12.Hospitality Lane and Carnegie Drive Transit Station Area 0 N I 2 F m ❑ E Em E Q m � o 0 III m �� 1 f2 d E o 0 > d tn 0 tn V C OTransk Station •Build-to Line (sea section 1 B.1 BA.040( W Z J In W K d U C R C L L Y0 F 14 F a E L U B1 Q r G d E L U Q etPg:97 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Figure 13.Hospitality Lane and Tippecanoe Avenue Transit Station Area wanaaa ^ San Barnaralm C? eN- =°S 1 _ FTTT a ' E 0 0 U c j� g �o.aMean E ae ■sa® y o hai > n 1 C °_ © '&1110-t0 � i N r {E�FI r I \ 'W I I I�w Metle`n f0.10A.P101 �oeaa?.. C6 ILIr W Z J 0 W W U G C L Q L �5 F r Q V Cd C t U a d e r U Q PacketP9. 98 ATTACHMENT Al 19.19A.030 Transit Station Area Types This chapter establishes five transit station area types,each with its own unique ^ character and neighborhood scale.The transit station area types are based on the c design and function of the stations and the predominant development patterns N surrounding the station.The station area types are a framework for tailoring the development regulations for each of the station areas.The station area types also 0 z provide a guide for applying the TD to additional areas within the city. c N A. Kendall Drive Neighborhood Stations.This type of station area provides E transit access to serve neighborhoods and businesses in the Kendall Drive area,within an approximately io-minute walk or up to a half-mile radius.The E station area is typically a predominantly residential area with supporting Q neighborhood or community level retail and services.The transit stations are designed as pull-up stations along an arterial and may include transfers U between bus rapid transit(BRT)and local bus service.The following transit c station areas are identified as Neighborhood Walk-up Station areas: E t) Kendall Drive and Palm Avenue o m z) Kendall Drive and Little Mountain Drive y O 3) Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills Drive v 13. E Street Neighborhood Stations.This type of station area provides transit access to serve surrounding neighborhoods and businesses in the E Street area north of 8th Street,within an approximately io-minute walk or up to a d' half-mile radius.The station area is typically a predominantly residential area o with supporting neighborhood or community level retail and services.The w transit stations are designed as pull-up stations along an arterial and may > include transfers between BRT and local bus service.The following transit / station areas are identified as Neighborhood Walk-up Station areas: C; t) E Street and Marshall Boulevard IL z) E Street and Highland Avenue W z 3) E Street and Baseline Avenue D C. Village/Urban Center Station Areas.This type of station area serves as a high- W activity center and village center for nearby residential neighborhoods,up to a half mile radius.The area contains a variety of neighborhood and community level retail uses and services,along with the integration of higher intensity housing including student housing,and offices uses in a mixed-use v configuration.The transit stations within this station area type are designed as p either a pull-up station along an arterial,or as an in-line station.The following transit station areas are identified as Village/Urban Center Station areas: o O 16 F- Q c v E U N Q r 0 E L U r Q Packet P9.99 ATTACHMENT Al 1) University Avenue and North Parkway [ z) E Street and North Mall Way v L Downtown Station Area.This type of station area is intended for the highest o intensity of development within in the city.The downtown station areas contain a planned mix of employment-intensive office,civic uses,regional- o level retail and service uses,entertainment,hospitality,education,hospital or z medical facilities,and high density residential uses in a compact urban form. ro Uses are to be served by an interconnected multi-modal transportation center E and public spaces network that will accommodate the highest levels of -0 pedestrian activity.The following transit station areas are identified as d Downtown Station Areas: E v 1) E Street and Court Street 0 0 U z) E Street and Rialto Avenue m E. Employment Center Station Areas.This type of station area serves as E concentrated employment areas within the city.They contain a mix of office p CL or high employment industrial uses,educational or technical training > institutions,hospital or medical facilities,supporting retail,restaurant, m entertainment,and other similar services.Higher density residential .. development,in mixed-use configurations,may also be located in to Employment Center Station Areas.The transit stations within this station area type are designed as either a pull-up station along an arterial,or as an in-line station.The following transit station areas are identified as Employment Center Station: 0 1 N 1) Hospitality Lane and Hunts Lane z) Hospitality Lane and Carnegie Drive 3) Hospitality Lane and Tippecanoe Avenue d, ! W z J ❑ j W 7 � V I C N C_ 0 L 17 Q G d E L V V Q C v E s U © Q Packet Pg. 100 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al t9e9A.04o General Provisions +� A. Precedence.The requirements of this chapter take precedence over the ^ citywide regulations found elsewhere in the City of San Bernardino c Development Code.In the event of a conflict between this chapter and other N portions of the Development Code,the provisions of this chapter shall govern. 0 B. Build-to Line.This chapter establishes standards for a Build-to Line(s)that Z apply to the TDs.Build-to Line is a lines)established at a certain distance from 0 the corresponding lot line along which the building,or a portion thereof,must E be built.The purpose of the build-to line is to ensure that redevelopment within the TD is well integrated with adjacent development and enhances the m E design character of existing streets,where appropriate.Build-to Lines also Q help to create consistent and strong pedestrian and public spaces that v advance commercial development and activity.The location of applicable 0 Build-to Lines is shown on Figures t through 13 of this chapter.Standards that CJ apply to properties adjacent to a Build-to Line are located in Section m 19.19A.05o below. E CL 0 C. Modifications to Existing Development.All legally established structures and uses within the TD which do not confirm with the standards contained within m this chapter shall be deemed legal nonconforming uses and/or structures.The o repair,renovation,and minor expansion to these uses and structures shall be m v allowed as permitted by Chapter 79.62(Nonconforming Structures and Uses). Ln D. Public Facilities. Public facilities such as parks, public schools, and transit centers and stations, and other public facilities due to their unique use and c special function may deviate from the provisions of this chapter upon N approval of a Design Review Development Permit., comment p '5; Add 19.t9A.05o Building Form and Placement Standards Formatted is P N A. Purpose and Intent.This section establishes standards for building form and o; placement within the TD.Customized standards are provided for each station area type.The intent of these standards is to ensure excellence in community and building design in order to create a vibrant and well-defined public realm Z that is pedestrian-friendly and supports transit use. Ifs Standards Established.Building form and placement standards in the TD are Lu the same as in the base zoning district,except as follows; y U t) Minimum and maximum requirements for Build-to Line setback,building m height,and upper floor step-back shall follow the standards specified in v Table igA.ot. O w @ L Q Q d E U Q C d E L U @ � a Packet Pg. 001 ATTACHMENT Al z) New development within TD station areas shall have no minimum lot size and no maximum lot coverage requirements. 3) New development along existing railroad right-of-way shall provide a minimum to-foot setback for landscaping and/or a multiuse pathway to ° accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. 6 C_ Residential Density. Z c t) Commercial Base Zones.When the TD applies to property within a d commercial base zone that already allows for residential uses,the -Ep maximum permitted density of the underlying zone shall apply. y E z) Residential Base Zones.When the TD applies to property within a Q residential base zone,maximum permitted residential density shall be the v same as the base zone. - o U D, Commercial Intensity.When the TD applies to property within a commercial base zone,the maximum permitted intensity of the underlying zone shall E apply. o v Table 19A.oi Building Form and Placement Standards m Build-to Line Upper Floor ❑ TD Station Areas Setback Building Height[t] Step-back z m c Kendall Minimum None[31 None None LO Neighborhood Station Areas Maximum 25 ft.[41 30 ft./z stories None EStreet Minimum None[31 None 8#NQne p Neighborhood 'a Station Areas Maximum 15 ft[4] 4z ft.13 stories None '> m Village/Urban Minimum None None 846None 0: Station Areas Maximum 15ft[4] 56 ft.14 stories None Ca Downtown Minimum None[3] None 846None rn Station Areas Maximum 15 ft[4] too ft./7 stories[5] None W Employment Minimum None[31 None 946None Z Cent J er Station ❑ Areas Maximum 25 ft.[4] 75 ft./6 stories None w Notes: [,]Building height of new development adjacent to existing single family residential zones may not exceed 30ft/2 stories V applicable to all TD station areas. V [z]Upper floor stapback shall be measured from the building wall at the street level C [3]Building must beset back to provide for aminimum ro-foot sidewalk including street trees.Buila[o line setback along C Tippecanoe Avenue shall provide for landscaping and a multiuse pathway to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. [41 Setback areas from the build-to line not occupied by a structure or driveway shall be landscaped and/or contain semi-public amenities such courtyards or outdoor seating areas. ❑ [5]Atltlftional height bonus maybe allowed per section ig.o6.030(2)(E). Zr_ ❑ 19 F_ Q c m s V Q C ttl E s U @ Q 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al E Building Presence along Build-to Lines.The primary building(s)located on a ^ parcel shall occupy the following minimum linear percentage of the parcel width fronting a build-to line: 1) Kendall Neighborhood Station Area:50% ° N z) E Street Neighborhood Station Area:60% o Z 3) Village/Urban Center Station Area:70% m 4) Downtown Station Area:8o% E a c 5) Employment Center Station Area:50% E F. Ground Floor Transparency.The ground floor building fa4acie facing a street frontage line shall consist of the following minimum area percentage glass '0 0 doors,windows,or other transparent materials. U c i) Kendall Neighborhood Station Area:50% E z) E Street Neighborhood Station Area:50% o m 3) Village/Urban Center Station Area:75% d O 4) Downtown Station Area:75% v 5) Employment Center Station Area:50% i v C. Entrance Orientation. v I � 1) Within the Kendall Neighborhood station area type,all ground-floor q .N building facades fronting a primary street shall feature a main building A entrance. °' z) Within the E Street Neighborhood,Village/Urban Center,Downtown,and Employment Center station area types,all ground-floor building facades o; fronting a primary street shall feature the building's main entrance. 1 H. Minimum First Floor Ceiling Height.For buildings with ground floor w commercial uses,the minimum required floor to ceiling height at the ground floor level for buildings facing public frontage lines shalFshouldbe 15 feet. w 1. Building and Site Design.Refer to Sections 19•19A•140 to 19.19A.16o for design guidelines applicable to building form and placement within the Transit Overlay District. m c a O x M O O zo t- a d E U R Q C d E L U � a Packet Pg. 103 ATTACHMENT Al © 19.i9A.o6o Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses ., A. Purpose and Intent.This section identifies permitted,conditionally permitted, and prohibited land uses within the TD.The intent of these regulations is to c permit and encourage land uses that create a pedestrian-friendly environment N that supports transit use and thriving commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. C Z IL Land Use Regulations—Commercial Base Zones.When the TD applies to c 0 property within a commercial base zone,permitted and conditionally E permitted shall be the same as the base commercial zone,except as specified below. E Q i) Permitted Uses.The following uses are permitted with the approval of a y Development Permit: 'a 0 0 • Convenience stores pursuant to Section ig.o6.025. • Dry cleaners E • Educational services 0. 0 • Medical/care facilities/social services(within CCS-i only) 6 • Mixed-use(with residential where allowed in commercial base zones) y • Mobile vendors • Neighborhood grocery stores v • Parking structures m z) Prohibited Uses.The following uses are prohibited: c • Auto parts sales 4 N • Auto repair � • Car,RV,and truck sales of • Car Washes • Service Stations • Service Commercial uses pursuant to Table o6.ot J.,excluding veterinary services IL • Impound vehicle storage yard w • Vehicle leasing/rental Z J • RV parks o • Blood banks W� • Drive-thru commercial uses m • Restaurants with drive-thru u c • Nurseries c v O w m L 21 r Q C d E L U Q C QI E s U a W Pg. 104 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al o 19.i9A.07o Residential Transition Standards A. Purpose.This section establishes standards to ensure that new development in the TD is compatible with adjacent single-family residential uses. 0 B. Applicability.The following standards apply to buildings located on a parcel that either: p Z i) Shares a property line with an existing single-family residential zone;or m 2) Faces an existing single-family residential zone across a street. E G C. Building Setbacks. E Q t) Front Setbacks. For a parcel located across a street from an existing single- d family residential zone,the front setback shall be no less than the average o front setback requirement of the facing homes block face but not more U than 20 ft. 2) interior Side Setbacks.For a parcel sharing an interior side property line c with an existing single-family residential zone,the interior side setback —y shall no less than the interior side setback requirement of the adjacent d property but not more than 20 ft. CI 3) Rear Setbacks.For a parcel sharing a rear property line with an existing IT single-family residential zone,the rear setback requirement shall be no less than io feet. v IL Upper Floor Step-backs. p N t) Front Building Walls. For a parcel located across a.street from an existing > single-family residential zone,the height of the front building wall shall not exceed 2 stories and 30 feet. N 2) Side and Rear Building Walls. For a parcel sharing an interior side or rear C' property line with an existing single-family residential zone,the height of ml the side or rear building wall,as applicable,shall not exceed 2 stories and w 30 feet. Z J 3) Upper Floors.When permitted by the applicable zone,any portion of a w building taller than 2-stories or 30 feet shal45h0uUstep back a minimum of 8 feet from the first-and second-story building walls. m v G m c 0 O m O O 22 H a d E U U Q C d E r O U Q Packet Pg. 105 ATTACHMENT Al E. Commercial Service Location and Screening. 1) Outdoor storage,trash collection and loading areas associated with commercial uses shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet from any property line abutting a parcel occupied by a detached single-family home. ° a 2) Outdoor storage,trash collection,and loading areas shall be located and c screened from view such that they are not visible from any parcel Z occupied by a detached single-family home. r 0 F. Parking and Driveways.See Section 19.20.100,Subsection G(Parking Buffers). E c G. Noise Generating Activities.Outdoor dining,amplified music,and other noise- E generating activities shall be set back a minimum of 150 feet from the Q property line of any parcel occupied by a detached single-family home. 0 19.i9A.o8o Parking v c N A. Purpose. E CL 1) This section establishes parking standards that apply to new and g d expanded land uses in the TD.The intent of the standards is to ensure the m success of the transit corridor by providing efficient parking in the corridor.This includes design standards for parking area design and parking supply standards. z) The parking requirements reflect the immaturity of the transit system along the corridor.As the system matures,there will be increased c potential to refine the parking requirements,applying techniques such as o parking maximums(e.g.,no minimum parking requirements).These T requirements should be updated as the system matures to reflect the m change in required parking along the corridor. 5� Required On-Site Parking.All land uses within the TD shall provide on-site c; parking as shown in Table 19A.3(Required On-Site Parking)unless further reductions can be justified as part of project approval by utilizing shared parking,unbundled parking,in-lieu parking fees,or other parking reduction w Z techniques,as described below: _J 1) Shared parking assessment shall be completed using the latest w information from ULI's(Urban Land Institute's)Shared Parking. d U 2) Unbundled parking occurs when development does not include parking in the standard cost of the facilities(e.g.,residents/employees must pay additional cost for the right to park on-site). 0 x @ 23 � Q c m E U U Q C d E S U Q Packet Pg. 106 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al 3) In-lieu parking fees are effective if a parking district or other management agency owns and maintains parking facilities.With in-lieu fees,a developer can pay the identified fee for the right to use that parking and reduce their own on-site parking facilities. c Table 19A.02 Required On-site Parkin Base Zoning District Parking Requirement Z (per sq.ft.of leasable area,unless otherwise not Commercial General CG-1 1 s ace er 30o s .ft. Commercial General-Baseline/Mt.Vernon(CG-2) 1 space per 500 sq.ft. E Commercial General-University Village CG-3 1 space per 250 sq.ft. Commercial Office CO 1 space per 370 sq. E Commercial Regional—Malls(CR-1) 15 ace per 250 sq.ft. Q Commercial Regional—Downtown(CR-2) 1 space per 500 sq.ft. d a Commercial Regional-Tri-Cit /Club(CR-3) i space per 250 sq.ft. 0 U Central City South CCS-1) 1 space per 500 sq.ft. Commercial Heavy CH 1 space per 300 sq.ft. E Industrial Heavy(IH) 1 space per 1,230 sq.ft.of gross o floor area Office Industrial Park OIP) 1 space per 350 sq.ft. d Public/Commercial Recreation(PCR) Special study required Public Facilities PF Special study required Public Flood Control(PFC) 1 space per access point Residential High(RH) 15 ace per unit .� Residential Low(RL) 1 space per unit Residential Medium(RM) 1 space per unit c Residential Medium High RMH 15 ace per unit C N Residential Suburban RS z s aces per unit > m Residential Urban RU 1 space per unit of Industrial Light IL 1 space per 625 sq.ft. w C. Residential Guest Parking.Current visitor and guest parking standards of the r underlying zone shall apply.On-street parking may be considered for visitors tOi to residential uses along public and private streets adjacent to the residential uj use. Z J D. Handicapped Parking Requirements.Handicapped parking space design shall w be consistent with approved designs in the off-street parking standards Section 19.24.050 c E. Bicycle Parking Requirements.One bicycle parking space shall be provided for each ten automobile parking spaces provided.For office and multifamily uses, 'o bicycle parking should be provided in sheltered and secure facilities. O x m 24 r a d E M U IV Q C v E s U Q 107 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al F. Location of Surface Parking.New surface parking lots shall-sho dd-not be located between the front wall of a building and a public street.Surface parking sha&should_be located to the rear or side of buildings.If surface ^ parking is not feasible,all other parking shall-should be located in structures, c underground,and/or off-site. N S,, Parking Structures.All multistory parking structures shall be lined with o commercial,retail,or residential uses on the ground floor along primary build- Z to lines,except for pedestrian and vehicular entries into the parking structure. y E H. Surface Parking Lot Screening. c d 1) Surface parking lots abutting a public sidewalk or street shall provide a E landscaped buffer and/or decorative or"greenwall"screening along the Q m perimeter of the parking lot abutting the sidewalk or street. c U z) Surface parking abutting a residential zone shall provide a six foot high decorative wall and a landscaped buffer at least 8 feet in width. E L Alley Access.For new structures adjacent to a rear alley,service access to the C property shall be provided only through the rear alley. m Z Driveways.All new driveways within a TD shall comply with the following ❑ standards. m V to 1) Driveways shall comply with the dimension standards shown in Table 1gA.03(Driveway Dimension Standards). a x) All new curb cuts providing access to a driveway from a public street shall o be separated a minimum distance of 50 feet from another existing or new w w curb cut,unless the parcel size requires shorter spacing. In that case,a > minimum spacing of 35 feet shall be provided. W 3) Parking spaces shall not be located along the sides of a driveway. � Table 19A.03 Driveway Dimension Standards Driveway Type Driveway Width W Minimum Maximum Z 1-way 8 ft. 1z ft. -J 2-way 20 ft. 25 ft. � v U C R C Q ❑ 25 F- Q c w E t U R a d E r U © w Q Packet Pg. 108 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al 19.19A.090 Subdivision Standards A. Purpose.This section establishes standards for the subdivision of parcels within the TD to ensure that large parcels are subdivided in a manner that "1 supports a walkable,transit-oriented environment. c N B. Applicability.The following standards apply to subdivisions of parcels 10 acres p or greater. Z c C. Block Lengths. 01 E 1) Except as permitted by Subsection z below,the maximum length of a y block created by the establishment of one or more new streets shall not E exceed 400 feet. Q m z) The City may approve a block length in excess of 400 feet when necessary 0 to achieve project compliance with connectivity standards in Subsection D U below,or if there are physical limitations,such as the size of the project y area,that do not allow for compliance with this standard. E CL 0 3) Block lengths shall be measured as the length of property abutting one side of a street between either the two nearest intersecting streets or the o nearest such street and any other physical barrier to the continuity of .. development.Block lengths shall be measured from property lines that to v intersect at an angle of 45 degrees or more. � D, Connectivity Standards. c 1) New streets established within the TD shall align and connect with any g existing adjacent street. N w z) Block lengths shall increase connectivity to surrounding existing and planned pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 3) New development of large sites(in excess of one acre)shall maintain and C4 enhance connectivity with a hierarchy of public streets,private streets, tO� walks and bike paths. w Z_ 4) Bicyclelpedestdan connections shall be provided at each cul-de-sac end, —J where feasible. w K am U G A G_ a L 0 26 H a E U U m Q c v E U U a Packet Pg. 109 ATTACHMENT Al G19.i9A.ioo Design Guidelines The guidelines are intended to promote quality design,consistent with City General Plan goals and objectives,while providing a level of flexibility to encourage creative design.These design guidelines implement various policies in the Land Use,Housing, N Economic Development,Community Design,Circulation,and Natural Resources and Conservation Elements pertaining to transit oriented development. Z A. Purpose and Intent.The following design guidelines are intended to direct the d physical design of building sites,architecture,and landscape elements located E within the City's Transit Overlay District(TD).This comprehensive approach c represents a more understandable and predictable role in shaping each TD's physical future by emphasizing community form,architectural typologies,and a landscape design that reinforce traditional and modern development cl patterns.In the Downtown,Village/Urban Center,and Employment Center U U station areas,contemporary architecture that has a strong pedestrian orientation,visual interest on the ground floor,quality long lasting materials, W human scale,and articulated facades are also encouraged.The guidelines are £ a intended to complement the mandatory TO development regulations o contained in this chapter by providing design solutions and interpretations of > the mandatory regulations. p @, Applicability.The i lin shall apply to all �o v development within the TO districts.Any addition,remodeling,relocation,or construction requiring a building permit within the TD districts that is subject to review by the Development Review Committee shall adhere to these guidelines where applicable.Unless there is a compelling reason,these o guidelines shall be followed.If a guideline is waived by the Development .N Review Committee,the Mayor and Common Council shall be notified.An y appeal,which does not require a fee,may be filed by the Mayor and Common P�j Council person within 15 days of the waiver approval. N C, Interpretation.Compliance with a design guideline written as a"should"is discretionary.A design guideline written with an action verb(e.g.,provide, use,locate,create,establish,employ)is highly recommended.Using these w terms are important,but may be waived or modified bylhe Development Z Review Committee based upon an alternative deemed acceptable through the o design review process. u D. Architectural Typology.The design guidelines for architectural typologies contained in this section(i.e.,Courtyard Housing,Row houses,Live/Work m Units,Stacked Flats,Mixed Use,and Office)are not all inclusive.Other architectural typologies may also be appropriate for other permitted uses as 'o listed in the Delevelopment Cc-ode. ❑ m L ❑ 27 F- E U v m a d £ r �"''� U l a Packet Pg. 110 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Gi9.i9A.iio DistrictImage The intent of this section is to establish a design framework for the development, enhancement,and preservation of San Bernardino Transit Overlay Districts,based upon traditional planning and urban design patterns,historical precedents,and N sustainability principles that ultimately drive the physical form of each district. 0 The over arching community vision for Transit Overlay Districts originates from a Z desire to create compact pedestrian-oriented environments consistent with d traditional transit oriented development principles which advocate: E 1. Compact Transit Districts.Characterized by easy access to multi-modal transit systems,a Q wide variety of housing types and services, and job sites located very close at hand. o U z. Connectivity.Characterized by a fine-grained and interconnected street network ensuring a E that all trips are as short as possible,disperse 0- 0 congestion,and are compatible with walking, m biking,and transit. iM > 3. Walkability.Characterized by commercial .c business,service establishments, v LO employment,and transit facilities that are located within a five-minute walk. 4. Placemaking.Characterized by urban patterns, '� o blockscapes,architecture,and landscaping that reinforces and complements the design heritage of the region. 5. Employment Accessibility.Characterized by C� good jobs located in higher-intensity"vertical campuses"located close to a variety of housing opportunities. w Z 6. Diversity of Housing Types.Characterized by a p fine grain of housing typologies,designed to W complement a wide variety of income levels and associated lifestyles. 0 ,' c :t m O w m O 28 f- Q c d E U U t9 Q C N E U U © a Packet Pg. 111 i 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al G19.i9A.12o Transit Oriented Design A transit district is a defined,higher-intensity, _t multimodal quarter designed to accommodate c a variety of coordinated movement systems, N including commuter rail,light rail,streetcar, BRT,bus,shuttle,pedestrian,and automobiles. 0 Z Transit oriented development is intended to m maximize access to mass transit amenities with E centrally located transit stations commonly surrounded by relatively high-intensity E commercial,office,and residential development.In general,successful transit Q oriented districts are well-used and well-loved people places,enriched by a dynamic mix of land uses,defined street-adjacent architecture,and comfortable urban spaces. 0 U Transit oriented districts are highly permeable,composed of an extensive network of transit modes that physically and visually link to the greater community,encouraging E enhanced connectivity that ultimately embraces transit ridership. E CL 0 The essence of a sustainable transit district is found in an integrated system of j commercial,residential,employment,and recreation uses coupled with a diversity of alternative circulation/transportation features that knit the district together in an integrated and holistic fashion.The goal is a low-carbon district with a sense of place, v concentration of activities coupled with urban spaces,and efficient architecture where daily life can unfold. a • Create a density gradient,locating the highest p intensity/density land uses closest to transit T stations,transitioning outward to lower y intensity/density uses. C • Locate pedestrian and transit-friendly C6 commercial activities at the ground level, office and residential above where supported tOI by the market.Use ground-floor storefront W windows to enliven the street by providing Z visual interest that encourages people to walk ❑ and take transit. w tr m • Provide civic amenities and urban open space � uses within transit districts designed to serve 1 E A transit users and residents. - E O m ❑ 29 I- Q c d E Z U a d E Z C U Q PacketPg. 112 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al • Develop a hierarchy of street designs that vary in modal emphasis,providing a balanced transportation system that accommodates transit,automobiles, 0 bicyclists,and pedestrians. Ilk w • Intensify building masses at corners to 6 Z accommodate pedestrian generating uses that enhance ridership E • Locate primary building entrances facing the public street,with clear connections to the adjacent sidewalk,ensuring pleasant and simple access for pedestrians. E Q • Provide a pedestrian-scaled street network composed of a dense grid of streets with short,direct connections between land uses and transit amenities.Provide U connections to local and regional multiuse paths and trails that encourage longer walking and bicycle trips improving accessibility for transit users. y E • Configure parking to be unobtrusive by orienting parking away from the p pedestrian realm,behind buildings,in structures,or underground.Utilize on- street parking,where feasible,to reduce off-street parking requirements, p providing parking opportunities to adjacent retail and service uses. m • Combine traditional ground-floor storefront commercial facilities at comer transit LO stop locations,enhancing"trip chaining"—performing one or more errand on the -- same trip. v G • Promote an interconnected street network and the use of short blocks(two to 0 N five net acres)to increase vehicular and pedestrian route choice,thus enhancing .5 connectivity,reducing trip length and vehicular greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions. 0) ' • Promote tight urban blocks that are not dominated by large surface parking areas,reducing convection losses and heat gains as adjacent buildings protect m one another from the wind and sun. 161 • Use street trees to modify the climate in a passive way(absorbing rather that Z reflecting heat energy,leaving opposed to the use of tacked-on architectural "green-bling." w • Create high-performance,energy-efficient buildings and infrastructure. v U G A G_ ❑ w 10 30 H Q c ro E s U t6 Q C d E .G U C Q Packet Pg. 113 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Ctg.tgA.130 Site Planning and Architectural Design A. Site Planning.Site planning within �'•r the TD should promote traditional 0 time honored building placements while accommodating pedestrian plazas,courtyards,and parking o Z located internal to the site.The goal is to place buildings adjacent £ to the public streetscape in order .o to enhance the pedestrian y experience by creating an enclosed E and defined environment,while Q sensitively accommodating the automobile.This traditional setting fosters a V people-oriented environment in which the needs of everyday life are easily U accessible.These guidelines are also intended to accommodate a wide variety of building typologies,in an effort to create a dynamic environment that ro promotes connectivity,walkability,commerce,jobs/housing balance,and a transit ridership. m i) Residential Site Planning.The residential site planning guidelines address a wide range v of architectural typologies designed to create a fine- grained district image.The C intent is to sensitively o orchestrate the location placement,and orientation of various multifamily attached dwelling types consistent with the nature of transit oriented development districts.What is envisioned is a small-scale"smattering"of traditional housing types—courtyard housing,row houses,stacked flats—seamlessly integrated into the fabric of the district.Ultimately,the goal is to disperse a wide variety of Z traditional multi-family attached dwelling types throughout the transit district,oriented toward the public realm,as opposed to internal oriented w gated mega-complexes.By sensitively siting multifamily dwelling types,it of is envisioned that higher-density dwellings will successfully blend into the m U TD,welcoming a variety of living arrangements and associated lifestyles. c m c v O w R 0 O 31 � Q c m E L U CO Q C d E L U Q Packet Pg. 114 ATTACHMENT Al z) Commercial and Office Site Planning.The commercial and office site planning guidelines are intended to promote time- - c honored building placements to N concentrate live-work,mixed- use,and office structures to 0 Z frame and enclose the public c streetscape.Buildings are to be ro placed near to the public E streetscape in order to create an enclosed and defined environment that promotes commerce,social interaction,and transit ridership.The purpose E is to create a fine-grained environment whereby modest live-work housing coexists with higher-intensity mixed use and office nodes and o adjacent residential neighborhoods.This traditional setting fosters a U people-oriented environment in which the needs of everyday life are easily accessible—an atmosphere that places automobiles behind buildings, a) concentrates activities,defines urban space,and promotes building a placements that celebrate people. d > B. Architectural Design and Image.The p San Bernardino Transit Overlay District architectural image is born N out of a desire to create enduring and human-scaled expressions rooted in the traditional architectural c heritage of the region.This o traditional architectural image w typically fosters a people-oriented environment characterized by a variety of building designs that frame and define the public streetscape. m All elements of architecture were traditionally constructed of highly durable co materials,defined by a discernible base,middle,and top that add architectural W rhythm to the streetscape.Composed of both modern interpretations and z traditional architectural precedents,architecture should be defined by cultural influences,graced by indigenous materials,and constructed with the time- w honored design principles of mass,scale,and rhythm.The following most common architectural typologies are defined for the TD:courtyard housing, row houses,stacked flats,live-work units,mixed-use,and office buildings.The guidelines do not preclude variations in these types of development or other E residential and non-residential products to be built.Ultimately,the purpose is 'E to avoid superficial"franchise style"architecture in favor of a more traditional O architectural image that embraces enjoyable life on the street. m O O 32 r- Q C d E L U 16 Q C Q, E r U Q Pac :8. 115 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al i) Courtyard Housing.Courtyard housing is defined by multi-story ^ building masses containing individual dwelling units that commonly c enclose a centralized outdoor private N courtyard space oftentimes containing formal gardens and Z decorative pavers. d Courtyard housing consists of: E • Two to four story building masses that frame and define the public E streetscape. Q • Building masses enclose internally oriented courtyard space. • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape and internal U courtyard. C • Modest building insets accommodate front yard gardens and U forecourts. o- • Individual unit frontages should be accessed directly from the street o m and internal courtyard. >y • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. o Traditionally within mild Mediterranean climates,such as Southern � California,courtyard housing was employed to capitalize on the positive indoor/outdoor relationship characterized by multi-story building masses that frame and enclose positive garden space.The attraction of courtyard r housing is its ability to function as a collection of individual units with private entries,yet having access to common space amenities. m O) r I W Z J 0 W U U C t0 C 0 w W O 33 F- a d E 0 U 10 a v E U �j U �I Y Q �. 116 ATTACHMENT Al The design guidelines for courtyard housing include the following: Ah 0 N O z c v E f � c m E Q d 0 0 U c d E CL 0 m a. Orchestrate multi-story courtyard housing building masses to frame y and enclose semi-private open space in the form of intemalized courtyards and patios(a,b,c,d,g,j,k,1). b. Provide individual unit entrances oriented toward semi-private interior courtyards(k,1)and semi-public street-oriented external forecourts(a, d, d). c 0 c. Craft traditional courtyard housing with a distinctive base(anchoring the dwelling to the ground plane);shaft(transitional element which m of 1 provides window transparency),and capital(roof cap which terminates the top of the dwelling)(a,d,g, C6 d. Avoid the use of continuous common exterior corridors.Instead, access upper-story dwelling units via attractive external staircases which are fully integrated into the fabric of the building(c,1). Z J e. Provide simple changes in wall plane to reduce the apparent mass and 0 w scale of the dwelling,consistent with the architectural style of the X home(a,g,i,j). W U C f. Create building relief through the use of tower elements and building projections designed to enhance facade variety and visual interest W. v O g. Define the public and private realms by providing a distinguishable and x ornamented transitional portal(h). 34 r Q c d E L U R Q G d E L III Q Packet Pg. 117 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Is0 . N O Z C N E C •T O E Q d O V C d h. Support covered porches,upper-story loggias,and balconies with E CL substantial columns,piers,and posts(b,d,e,f,g). o 0 1. Provide ample"punched"window and door recesses designed to express building mass.Minimum window and door recess should measure four inches deep(b). c un j. Provide traditional vertical orientated windows(a,b,g). v k. Provide simple changes in wall plane to reduce the apparent mass and r 0 scale of the dwelling,consistent with the architectural style of the '7n home(a,g,I,j). > W I. Provide protruding wing walls as a natural extension of the building, N v designed to enclose and define private outdoor patio spaces. o� m. Use arcades and colonnades as semi-private transitional elements G designed to frame courtyard spaces(c). W Z n. Provide upper-story projecting balconies supported by protruding dimensional timber corbels(d,e,g). w IY o. Configure courtyards in a usable fashion,designed to accommodate W outdoor entertaining,recreation,and leisure amenities(j,k,1). c M c p. Orient on-site garages toward the rear of the site accessed from an v alley.On-grade and tuck-under parking facilities should be provided, O characterized by enclosed garages designed to accommodate residents. 0 0 35 I- Q C d E L U l6 Q C d E L U Q Packet Pg. 118 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al z) Row Houses.A row house is a multi-story single-family dwelling that shares a common wall with adjacent o units of the same type, N occupying the full width of the frontage line,designed to Z frame and enclose the streetscape in a regimented m fashion. v m Row house design consists of: Q • Two-to-three story building masses that frame and define the public v streetscape. U • Front dooryards accommodate raised stoops or garden. • Individual units are directly accessible by pedestrians from the public N street a • Outdoor terrace space sometimes occurs between the street—facing m dwelling and rear garage. m • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. D This traditional tall and slender attached building typology exhibits all the trappings of the classic urban oriented dwelling form,commonly defined by multi-story building masses with raised stoops,projecting window bays, and defined entrance features that greet the public realm.Row houses typically form regimented street walls that promote streetscape 0 continuity,framing and enclosing the public streetscape. T d m ui a W 2 J 0 W d V C A c -6 O 0 0 36 F- r m E U Q C d E t [^ U j Q ATTACHMENT Al The design guidelines include the following 0 N O Z c d E C W v 0 vu � d 0 U c m O d a. Provide two-to-three story building masses designed to frame and > define the public streetscape(a,d,g, b. Create consistent row house unit bay rhythms designed to form a consistent and disciplined street wall(a,d,g,j). C. Anchor row house corners with higher intensity towerfeatures(a,b). c 0 d. Craft traditional row houses with a distinctive base(anchoring the Mn dwelling to the ground plane),shaft(transitional element that y provides window transparency),and capital(roof cap that terminates the top of the dwelling)(c, a e. Shelter residents by providing ample entrance indentations(e,i). Row house building entrances should be designed with a minimum square footage of io square feet and minimum depth of 4 feet w z f. Define individual unit entrances oriented toward the public street(e,i). 0 U.1 o! m U C R C 0 V M 0 D 37 H a d E t U a v E r U r Q PacketPg. 120 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al .a,, 0 N O Z C N E v d k A E a o v fill E E g. Enhance interior viewing opportunities with bay window projections to m optimize viewing angle(a,b,c,g,h,j). d O h. Provide traditional windows that are vertical in orientation(a,b,c,f,g, h,j)- vii jI. Recess window and door openings into the row house facades to express the mass of the building(j). c 0 j. Elevate row house units to ensure resident privacy while enhancing .N surveillance of the public streetscape(a,g,i,j,k). > k. Avoid locating entrances directly on-grade. Instead,entries should be N elevated 24 inches,minimum(a,g,i,j,k). C� I I. Integrate exterior staircases and stoops into the fabric of the building fDi (i).Design exterior staircases and stoops,including balusters, w handrails,and treads,using similar materials as the row house Z dwelling.Prefabricated metal staircases shall not be permitted. p W m. Provide private outdoor open space in the form of stoops(i),balconies W (f,I),and dooryard gardens(k).Private open space should be a U minimum of Zoo square feet c_ n. Orient on-site parking garages toward the rear of the site accessed v from an alley. O w @ L F_ 38 F_ Q c m E s U Q C d E r U w Q Packet Pg. 121 ATTACHMENT Al 3) Stacked Flats.si flat is a self- ^ contained housing unit that occupies only part of a building. In a stacked-flat building,several o units,above and beside each N other share a common entry and are accessed through common, Z semiprivate spaces. m The design of stacked flats E consists of: d E • Three to four-story building masses that frame and define the public Q streetscape. • Modest setback may accommodate front patio space. o U • Buildings are accessed from a common street-adjacent entrance portal. • Individual units are directly accessed from interior double-loaded �+ hallways. a • Internally oriented underground or podium parking is accessed from c m limited street portals.Internally oriented courtyards are located above > m parking areas. ❑ In addition to their classic scale and eye-catching proportions,the beauty IT of stacked-flat structures is their ability to frame and enclose broad boulevards and avenues,creating a pedestrian-friendly environment.It is this traditional relationship of the public street to the private building that is critically important in establishing a sheltering and safe pedestrian 4 setting that enhances social interaction and commerce. n > d N UI W J ❑ o. W a� d t V C A C 'a 0 O G w L ❑ ❑ 39 f- a d E L U R Q C d E L Q ATTACHMENT Al The design guidelines for stacked flats include the following: _ 0 N h �1..,.. o Z C d E a c m E Q N v 0 ihn E a 0�, m a. Create traditional,formal,proportional,and rhythmic multilevel d building masses to unify the public blockscape(a,d,g,j). M b. Provide traditional,formal building masses designed to frame and v enclose the public streetscape(a,d,g,j). �. c. Celebrate the street comer by increasing or articulating building mass, v c using tower elements as"gatepost"architectural features(b). o N d. Distinguish buildings with a discernible base(c)and cap(a,d,e,f,)that > to define the top and bottom of the structure.Use continuous building elements,such as roof eaves(a,d,e,g),cornice elements(f,h), window bands(b,d,f,g,h),and masonry foundation bases(c)to o� assure building unity and blockscape continuity. I e. Rest the building on a wide discernible foundation base to anchor the w j building to the ground plane(c). Z f. Create visual rhythms with building masses that divide facades into Lu individual repetitive components.Segment buildings into individual d elements using the following techniques: c m Vertical tower masses(b,e) :c a • Horizontal repeating spandrels U` • Consistent repetitive roof forms(a,d, e) R O 40 r a d E s U i Q C N E t �I Q PacketPg. 123 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al N 6 Z C d E v c m all E R� m v N E Q g. Distinguish individual floors using the following techniques: d • Projecting horizontal cornice elements(f) D • Decorative masonry belt courses(f) • Change in material pattern between floors(f) v h. Define individual units with subtle facade articulations.Use repetitive elements such as structural bays(j),recessed loggias(g,j,1),and projecting balconies(k)to distinguish individual units. N I. Provide distinguishable recessed building entrances,oriented toward d the public street,as common building access points to internal- oriented lobbies and vertical circulation elements(1). C; j. Generally center windows on the building mass,and align both horizontally and vertically(a,b,d,e,f,g,h). w k. Express building mass by recessing window openings in building facades a minimum of 4 inches(a,b,d,f,g,h). w Lu I. Provide windows that are vertical in orientation(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,k). m. Integrate projecting balconies(k)and recessed loggias(g,l)seamlessly with the design of the building.Projecting balconies should be v minimum 5 ft deep and recessed loggias should be a minimum of 60 0 square feet. w m D 41 � c m E U v m Q c v E r U Q Packet Pg. 124 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al 4) Live-Work Units.A live—work building is designed to accommodate both commercial ^ and residential uses within a c single unit,commonly with retail �� , .■ N and office uses on the first floor and upper floors dedicated to 6 Z residential use. c m Live-work units consist of: E v • Two to three-story building masses that frame and define the public E streetscape. Q • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape. • Sidewalk-adjacent building masses accommodate ground—floor �j t businesses. • Ground floor businesses are accessed directly from the public street. i Private residences are accessed from internal lock-outs or separate £E CL I street-oriented entrances. • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. d f Traditionally,live-work establishments were occupied by merchants or 11 employees who lived directly above their place of business,enabling entrepreneurs to establish business in an economical fashion.with the economic realities of today,this lifestyle concept is again gaining acceptance as a small business approach designed to provide goods and services while promoting enhanced housing diversity. o N 04 t N r r i W Z J 0 W of N U C A _C L W L 0 42 F Q c m E t v A Q c m E s U t6 Q Packet Pg. 125 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al The design guidelines include the following: a d N O -.III Z C v E C y E Q d L O U C d E O_ O d a. Provide multistory live-work building masses designed to frame and 0 define the public realm(a,d,g,j). .. b. Provide dual—unit entrance designed to accommodate both residents Ln and merchants.Provide direct storefront workspace access oriented toward the public streetscape.Provide secondary upper-story access v designed to accommodate residents(i). o N c. Design ground—floor live-work storefronts using traditional storefront > heights to allow natural light to penetrate street-oriented display d windows,illuminating storefront interiors(c,e,f). w v d. Express the underlying structure of the building.Use a sequence of r' storefront structural bays designed to convey how the building stands up(c,e,f)• w Z e. Provide a series of storefront structural bays,composed of repetitive vertical columns/piers and horizontal spandrels designed to create a w consistent facade rhythm(c,e,f). m U G 10 C V O w t0 0 43 F- E s U a r N E r U Q Packet Pg. 126 ATTACHMENT Al 0 N r z Z G d E c E m 0 0 U c d E a f. Distinguish higher-intensity building corners with tower elements designed to resolve two converging street walls(h). >> O g. Provide upper-story private resident outdoor open space in the form of decks(i)and balconies(k).Private open space should be a minimum of v u� loo square feet.Balconies should be a minimum 5 ft in depth. h. Recess doors and windows into masonry and exterior plaster walls to v C express building mass.Minimum door and window recess should o measure four inches(k). d 1. Accommodate vehicles parking onsite by providing rear-oriented enclosed garages(1). j. Live/work configurations include: I • Live above work w • Live within work 2 I • Live behind work(attached) O W • Live behind work(detached) d v c R G_ O 44 H Q c d E s v m Q C N E t U Q Packet Pg. 127 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al 5) Mixed-Use.Mixed use is defined by higher-intensity developments that include two or more physically integrated o uses on one site or within one N structure,including combinations of retail,office, ° Z institutional,residential,or other land uses. m E a Mixed-use buildings consist of: y E • Three to four-story building masses frame and define the public Q streetscape. D • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape. ° U • Sidewalk—adjacent building masses accommodate ground—floor � businesses. m • Ground—floor businesses are accessed directly from the public street. E CL Offices and private residences are accessed from internal lobbies and ° hallways. m • internally oriented underground,podium,or parking court are accessed from limited street portals. v Traditionally,mixed-use districts are designed as pedestrian-friendly Ln environments characterized by a variety of building typologies designed to frame,enclose,and embrace the public realm.Because commercial, c residential,and employment land uses are placed in such close proximity, 4 the needs of everyday fife are easily accessible,while enhancing h alternative transportation modes such as walking and transit ridership. m W Z milk J of 0 w m U C C V i 0 w A O D 45 � Q c m E t U R a C d E U Q Packet Pg. 128 ATTACHMENT Al Design guidelines for mixed-use buildings include the following: Aft ►rr N Z s a i e f ¢ m 0 0 U c m E CL 0 0 a. Create traditional street walls composed of a storefront base,upper- m story facade,and roof cap designed to frame and enclose the ❑ streetscape,creating a pedestrian-friendly"Main Street'atmosphere (a,d,g,D• IT b. Differentiate individual building masses along the street wall with slight indentations to enhance blockscape variety and visual interest(a, d,g)• o N c. Use similar structural bay and window rhythms to promote blockscape K 3 continuity d. (I)• d. Express the underlying structure of the building.Use a sequence of m structural bays designed to convey how the building stands up(a,d,g, I)• W e. Provide tower elements to accentuate and highlight building comers, Z J emphasizing higher intensity land uses(a,d,b). w f. Use tower elements at comers as a transitional element that resolves W two converging street walls(a,b,d, m g. Create visual rhythms with structural bays that divide buildings into individual repetitive components(e). O m L ❑ 46 F- Q c m E t U R a d E s U a Packet Pg. 129 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al 0 N O Z Iii 4 r d EO rte_ Q �l N a O U c m E CL h. Provide a series of structural bays,composed of repetitive vertical columns/piers and horizontal spandrels/arches designed to create a y consistent facade rhythm(f,h). O L Create visually distinct and substantial three-dimensional columns(i) v u) and piers(h). j. Promote human scale by creating a series of proportional structural c bays that segment the building into individual components.Structural o bay width typically ranges between 24-30 feet(h). Mn d r^ k. Use traditional storefront heights to allow natural light to highlight display windows,illuminating storefront interiors(e,f,h,1). r C6 I. Design storefronts that are balanced,with symmetrical proportions defined by structural bays,and characterized by storefront display 161 J windows,transom windows,recessed doorways,bulkheads,sign W bands,and awnings/canopies(e,f,h,1). m. Create substantial covered arcades capable of accommodating W pedestrian movements while sheltering patrons from the elements(i). y U n. Provide substantial three-dimensional arches designed to express the m q mass of the building(e,f,i,1). v o. Use columns to continue the plane of upper-story facades(i). w L 9 47 ~ j Q c N E s U R Q r N E © O Q Packet Pg. 130 6E.a ATTACHMENT Al p. Design awnings to complement the structural framework of the building.Awnings should express the shape and proportion of structural bays and window openings(1). q. Locate transom windows above storefront display windows to N increase interior daylighting(e,f,k). 0 z c m E 'a C m E Q v 0 0 U Y C d E 0. 0 m d v v C 0 M W N r 01 r W z J ❑ W d U G m C_ 9 0 A ❑ 4$ � a d E r Y Y a d E M U >r Q Packet Pg. 131 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al 6) Office.An office building is a place available for the transaction of general business,administration,and research and development functions typically not o involving labor,manufacturing, c5 fabrication or retail sales. 6 Z Office buildings should generally be characterized by: d E v • Three to four-story building masses C m that frame and define the public streetscape. E • Building frontages are oriented toward the public streetscape, Q sometimes accommodating covered arcades and colonnades. 0 • Buildings are accessed from a street-adjacent common entrance portal. j • Individual office units are accessed from internal lobbies and hallways. • Internally oriented courtyards are located above underground or 0 E podium parking. o • Internally oriented underground,podium,or parking courts are —y accessed from limited street portals. d Within traditional urban settings,office buildings become an integral to element within the district mosaic,integrating seamlessly with other uses to form a rich and diverse mixture.Traditionally,office buildings and primarily building entrances,are located contiguous to the street, designed to frame and enclose the public realm while accommodating parking within internal-oriented courtyards or parking structures. o N N 47 r i I W Z J ❑ W d U C C_ O (0 ❑ ❑ 49 4 Q c N E U U R w Q C d E s U r Q Pa° 2 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al Design guidelines for office buildings include the following: Ah 0 N O Z G d E G d E a d 0 U G N E ih)h a Q t;- O a. Create building masses reflecting a distinguishable base,shaft,and capital(a,b,c,d,g,j). , b. Rest the building on a distinguishable ground floor base or pedestal designed to anchor the building to the ground plane(g). m c. Provide ground floor arcades and recessed entries that shelter pedestrians from the elements(f,k). o d. Create a definable building shaft,designed as a transitional facade •� element which links the building base and capital(h,1). m e. Crown the building with a discernible building capital,designed to terminate the top of the structure(a,d,g,j). c6 f. Distinguish building corners by providing tower elements as landmark `°i structures,designed to resolve two converging street walls(b). Z g. Create structural bays that visibly display the underlying structure of p the building(e,f,h). W W h. Segment buildings into repetitive scale-giving elements composed of 0) columns/piers and spandrels/arches(e,f,h,i). G A G L Create distinct and recognizable horizontal floor divisions.Use such v techniques as horizontal window bands,continuous cornice elements, O masonry belt courses,and repetitive window lintels designed to Zr distinguish individual floors(a,c,d,e,g,h,i, 50 h a d E s v m a E Z U a Packet Pg. 133 ATTACHMENT Al o 6 Z E a d b � � I E a MI o i E On j. Create visual rhythms with structural elements that divide facades into y individual repetitive components.Building structures should be y segmented into simple symmetrical components based upon the following facade rhythm standards: �o • Vertically repeating columns and piers(e,f,h,i). • Horizontal repeating spandrels(h,j) • Vertically-oriented windows repeated in horizontal bands recessed c a minimum of four inches from the solid wall plane designed to 0 express building mass(e,g,h,i, k. Segment horizontal window openings with mullions into a series of vertical oriented windows(e,h). w I. Provide traditional windows divided by muntins into a series of individual window panes(h). W m. Define window opening with lintels,masonry belt courses,sills,and Z awnings(1). 0 W n. Use traditional,small,and durable human-scaled masonry building materials(c,d, U C o. Provide a definable and prominent building entrance designed to signal egress(k). 'v O m D O St F— Q c m E 0 U r a v E r U a Packet Pg. 134 ATTACHMENT Al 7) Building Materials.Traditional indigenous building materials promote community identity by promoting an identifiable architectural vision,firmly rooted in the vernacular of the region.Traditionally,building materials such as brick and stone masonry are measured in human-scaled units. Because these materials are so commonplace,literally the building blocks ° N of a civilized society,they are easily discernible and readily understood. Traditional building materials help us understand and scale larger Z buildings,ultimately connecting us to the built environment. v E v c m E Q 0 '0 0 U c m E M 0 d • rr • tl I N a. Use durable and refined wall materials to project a traditional p architectural image(a). .y b. Design buildings that use heavy,visually solid foundation materials(b, of e)that transition upward to lighter wall cladding and roof materials. N c. Use durable and substantial foundation materials such as rusticated stone(b),polished granite,and sandblasted concrete(c). d. Provide human-scaled wall materials that are familiar in their W Z dimensions and can be repeated in understandable units(b,c). 0 e. Provide wall materials such as brick and stone masonry that help of people interpret the size of a building(b,e). y U f. Use traditional brick masonry dimensions(b,e). g. Use real,smooth,three-coat exterior plaster applications(a,c). 20 Exterior plaster finishes should appear hand troweled,with slight x surface variations(a,c). m o` 0 52 r Q c m E 0 U R Q C E U U w i � Q 1 Packet Pg. 135 ATTACHMENT Al 8 I a N r 6 2 c u h - k E c m E a m v 0 U h. Provide exterior plaster finishes that are not overly exaggerated or irregular such as Spanish Lace. E CL L Use metal cladding(such as corrugated metal)with discretion, c primarily for architectural accents and structural members(f,g,j). d j. Use traditional gloss-glazed transparent tile with deep,rich colors for architectural accents. fO v k. Avoid large featureless wall surfaces,such as metal screens,unrelieved stucco facades,and all-metal spandrel panels. y^. I. Provide material changes at a change in wall plane on an inside comer o (f)• .h d m. Use durable metal roof materials that enhance the longevity of W buildings,including copper,Corten steel,standing seam(i),and"V" N seam. m n. Provide traditional straight-barrel mission tile roofs composed of clay mi or concrete if tile is to be used(h). U.1 o. Use rubber membrane materials for flat roofs only. Z p. Define flat roofs with a substantial parapet wall capped with w ornamental coping designed to screen vents and mechanical W equipment(k). u c q. Support roof eaves and rake overhangs with substantial dimensional timber beams,rafter tails,brackets,and corbels(1). 'n O r. Avoid nondurable roofing materials such as wood shingles(real or cementitious)and composition roofing. D O 53 t- a E s U IV r Q C d E L u Q Packet Pg. 136 -Gtq.tgA.t4o Parking Design ATTACHMENT Al On-street parking lanes,parking structures,and rear parking courtyards are ^ dedicated to the temporary storage of vehicles.The intent is to reduce the physical 0 and visual impact of vehicles,fostering a pedestrian atmosphere. N Traditionally,parking garages were beautifully ornamented structures seamlessly z integrated into the fabric of the business district,having their own special typology designed to harmonize with their surroundings.Today,new innovative solutions d have been developed to soften the impact of vehicular storage,including screening E garages with commercial storefronts,underground parking,and internal parking courts. E Q t: U c m E CL 0 d m •, o f a �n V v c all a 0 y a. Locate parking structures internal to the site and screened from public view.Use street-oriented building masses and commercial storefronts to screen parking structures from the streetscape(a,b,c,d,e,f). C6 b. Provide ample parking structure identification signage designed to distinguish and highlight public parking garages(b,c). w c. Design the facade of parking structures to mimic a traditional building Z composed of window openings and accruements intended to project a w consistent streescape image(c,e). m d. Use continuous horizontal elements,such as projecting cornice c elements,window bands,and brick courses consistent with adjacent � building facades(c). O R O 54 F— Q c m E t U r Q C d E z U Q Packet Pg. 137 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al g N O Z E c E 0 c e. Align parking structure facade walls with adjacent buildings to create a E continuous street wall(e). 0- 0 0 f. Promote on-street parking opportunities to slow traffic in district w cores.Motorists must be alert and aware to navigate the traditional 0 intimate streetscape(g,h,i). W v g. Provide on-street parallel parking lanes designed to promote a traditional"Main Street'image and physical buffer.Parallel parking lanes are symbolic of traditional downtowns and provide a physical r and psychological buffer between the street and pedestrian sidewalk (g)• > m h. Provide on-street parallel parking lanes to accommodate short term t ) convenience parking(g,h,i). i. Provide diagonal parking stalls to encourage short-term convenience parking opportunities,enhancing commerce(i). W j. Eliminate pedestrian/vehicular conflicts.Curb cuts should not occur Z J along storefront street walls.Curb cuts should only occur on side-alley- w loaded blocks,providing alley access to internally oriented parking K courts and service areas. d V k. Locate long-term on-site parking behind buildings,screened from public view(j,k). :o I. Design onsite parking areas as dual-usage courtyards to accommodate vehicles as well as pedestrians.Provide amenities such as raised � O O 55 a E s U R a v E r u a Packet Pg. 138 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al fountain pedestals,tree bosques,and textured pavement treatments designed to accommodate pedestrians(1). m. Segment large parking areas into a series of small parking courts enclosed by buildings and framed by canopy trees designed to N minimize the scale of the total parking area(j,k,1). c n. Create internalized parking courts designed to accommodate long- Z term parking opportunities.Design parking courts as dual-usage plazas y intended to accommodate both vehicular and pedestrian activities. E c o. Surface parking lots adjacent to public streets should incorporate a minimum 4 ft deep landscape buffer with trees and other plant Q material.Where a landscape buffer is not feasible,a screen wall with 0 decorative detailing and/or landscaping should be provided.Screen 0 walls should be visually permeable and provide openings for pedestrian access. y E G19.19A.150 Landscape Design p d A. Landscape Image.The San Bernardino Transit Overlay District landscape m pattern is intended to project a formal impression designed to reinforce the transit village image,rooted in the landscape heritage of the region.This j formal landscape pattern justifies itself through the use of consistent street tree plantings which form tree-lined rows that frame and define the streetscape while shading and sheltering pedestrians from the elements. v Public urban open spaces,such as plazas and courtyards,formal tree plantings 0 create a framework outlining these public oriented amenities.Within TDs,the .7 landscape image is designed to reinforce a pedestrian dominated environment that celebrates human culture rather than the automobile to (v create a sense of place while reinforcing the higher intensity nature of these N transit nodes as commercial,residential and employment hubs of the m community. G I B, Landscape.Landscape design is intended to improve or ornament the physical W environment through the use of such elements as plant materials,water Z features,and land forms,designed to modify the physical setting for aesthetic p purposes. w K C. Street trees are an important asset to the streetscape,due to there functional m U ability to modify the micro climate by providing summer shade,winter transparency(solar gain),while purifying the air.From a design standpoint, � trees can positively frame and enclose the streetscape,creating an enhanced Ea pedestrian environment that defines the public realm;while formal orchard- O style tree grids soften parking fields. m O O 56 I- Q c v E t U m a G U E U U a Packet Pg. 139 6.E.a ATTACHMENT Al a d o N O d E L f G m E O a. Provide a consistent streetscape image through the use of formal E CL canopy-style street tree plantings that provide summer shade and o winter transparency(a,d). b. Plant formal rows of street trees designed to frame and enclose the . streetscape(a,d). W) c. Provide raised planters adjacent to light rail transit lines designed as a physical shield to guard pedestrians(b). c 0 d. Use raised planters contiguous to higher capacity arterials,buffering 'N pedestrians from vehicles(c). y e. Provide individual groupings of plant containers(b)or raised planters N along sidewalks with colorful flowering annuals and perennials(e,f). I f. Use tree grates and guards to protect street tree root systems, reducing soil compaction. w Z g. Design landscape buffers adjacent to rear building elevations to soften —� building architecture while providing a landscaped transition between w the rear parking area and building. m h. Use tress in grids designed to mimic orchard-style plants designed to provide a shady grove designed to shelter vehicles and motorists from c elements(g,h). a O r M O 57 Q c m E L O a d E L O a Packet Pg. 140 ATTACHMENT Al 0 N O rs» C rnrrr+r m G d E Q d 0 i 4 U w c m i. Use tall columnar trees to frame and enclose parking fields creating a E CL solid backdrop that protects interior canopy-style orchard trees. o d j. Use tall columnar trees to segment large parking fields into a series of 0 "outdoor rooms"breaking-up large expanses of pavement. c k. Use medians and islands to segment large parking fields creating variety and visual interest while mimicking traditional orchard grids(h). v I. Provide landscape amenities including raised fountain pedestals,tree G 0 bosques,and enhanced paving designed to screen vehicles from public .0 C view(f,g). m m. Provide decorative and ornamental low parking field walls to screen `/ N vehicles from public view(k,I). n. Build seating into low screen walls designed to accommodate waiting poi transit riders(k). Lu Z o. Use native and drought tolerant plant materials to promote an indigenous landscape image. w p. Segment landscape areas into individual hydro zones designed to conserve water by grouping similar plant materials with like water m requirements. G v O m O 5$ �— a d E L U R Q G d E L U W Q Packet Pg. 141 (Companion Resolution CDC/2009-11) 6.E.b I RESOLUTION NO. 2009-60 2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONSENTING AND APPROVING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO o 4 ('CITY") TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO CALTRANS FOR COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (CBTP) GRANT z6 5 PROGRAM FUNDS d 6 E WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino ("Council') c W 7 recognizes the need to promote mass transit, the planning and funding of various transportation m 8 s projects and the implementation of Transit Oriented Development ("TOD") which together will u 9 play a major role in the future revitalization efforts to be undertaken by the Redevelopment Agency W W E 10 of the City of San Bernardino ("Agency") both within the downtown area and in other appropriate 11 areas of the City of San Bernardino("City"); and °. 12 WHEREAS, the Agency recognizes the benefits to be derived from receiving Community- 13 -- Based Transportation Planning("CBTP") Grant Program Funds; and 14 WHEREAS, the CBTP Grant Program Funds are made available by CalTrans to encourage g N 15 livable/sustainable community concepts with a transportation or mobility objective and promote 0 16 tD community identity and quality of life, and the City is eligible to apply to CalTrans for such CBTP o 17 w Grant Program Funds and to then make such funds available for administration and use by the z6 18 Agency as a sub-recipient of the application of the City. s 19 —' NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY 20 � THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AS a 21 FOLLOWS: aCi E 22 Section 1. The Council hereby finds and determines that the facts and circumstances set 23 forth in the Recitals hereof are true and correct in all respects. c 24 Section 2. The Council hereby consents to the submittal of a CBTP Grant Program Funds E 25 application and hereby approves and authorizes the Interim City Manager to execute and to submit a 26 the application on behalf of the City together with such additional information from the Agency as 27 the sub-recipient for the use and administration of the CBTP Grant Program Funds for the study of 28 potentially qualifying projects within the City. 1 Pa6kot Pg 142 F:\WILSOMFDA103-16A9 CBTP Applictl ao ion MCC R .doc 6.E.b 2009-60 1 Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption and execution in the manner 2 as required by the City Charter. 3 0 N 4 O Z 5 c m 6 a c d 7 /// E a d 8 /// o U 9 E 10 /// c 6 �o 12 13 14 /// y d 15 /1/ 0 16 0 0 17 /// N O Z 18 /// C O 3 19 /// o N d 20 Q 21 d E 22 U 23 Y c 24 E t 25 a 26 27 28 2 FAVA SOMEDAU-1F CBW AppliMim MCC Rwo.dM 6X.b 2009-60 1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONSENTING AND APPROVING THE 2 INTERIM CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 3 ("CITY") TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO CALTRANS FOR COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (CBTP) GRANT o 4 PROGRAM FUNDS 6 5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and z r v 6 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a J oint regular meeting E d 7 thereof,held on the 16th day of March 2009,by the following vote to wit: E d 8 Council Members: Ayes Nays Abstain Absent 0 9 ESTRADA x w E 10 BAXTER x 0 C d 11 BRINKER x o v 12 VACANT 13 KELLEY x 14 JOHNSON x H 15 MC CAMMACK x 0 so 16 �/� �• C �/L-�C— 04 17 Rache G. Clark, City Clerk 6 z 18 0 19 The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this day of March 2009. o N d 20 21 Rikke Van Johnson, Mayor Pro Tern 22 City of San Bernardino E U A w 23 a Approved as to Form: 24 22 r 25 By: 26 James F. Penman, City Attorney 27 28 3 eY Pg:.144. fdWILSOMEDAWl-1609 CBTP APPliolbn MC[Raodoc (NOTE: COMPANION RESOLUTION CDC/2009-62) 6.E.c 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-342 2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING CERTAIN AGREEMENTS o AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE (1) AN AGREEMENT N 4 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY AND CALTRANS FOR COMMUNITY- c BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ("CBTP") GRANT PROGRAM z 5 FUNDS AND (2) A SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN ° W THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN E 6 a BERNARDINO ("AGENCY")AND THE CITY 7 a WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino recognizes the 8 0 need to promote mass transit, the planning and funding of various transportation projects and the 9 E implementation of Transit Oriented Development("TOD") which together will play a major role in a 10 the future revitalization efforts to be undertaken by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San m Bernardino ("Agency")both within the downtown area and in other appropriate areas of the City of 12 San Bernardino ("City"); and 13 WHEREAS, the Agency recognizes the benefits to be derived from receiving Community- c 14 w Based Transportation Planning ("CBTP") Grant Program Funds and seeks to participate with the 15 City with respect to the CBTP Grant Program Funds; and M 16 0n WHEREAS, the CBTP Grant Program Funds are made available by Caltrans to encourage g 17 a livable/sustainable community concepts with a transportation or mobility objective and promote z6 18 a community identity and quality of life, and the City is eligible to apply to Caltrans for such CBTP °— 19 Grant Program Funds, and has in fact submitted such application to Caltrans, and upon receipt of d 20 such CBTP Grant Program Funds to then make such funds available for administration and use by m 21 c the Agency as a sub-recipient of the application of the City; and d E 22 s WHEREAS, on March 16, 2009, the Council authorized the submittal of a CBTP Grant 23 a application for the development of a TOD Overlay District and designated the Agency as the c 24 d proposed sub-recipient for the ultimate use of such funds; and E 25 WHEREAS, the application as submitted by the City has been selected by Caltrans for a 26 funding in the amount of $250,000, and pursuant to the approval letter from Caltrans dated 27 September 14, 2009, this Mayor and Common Council must adopt a Resolution that identifies the 28 1 e:�e�a.eves.oiN�o�:uc�w�m��zwm�a-�s-o�cartS b-x i,�w A�MMCC R.d« Pag4t;f9. 145' 6.EC 2009-342 1 grant request and authorizes a representative of the City to enter into a contract with Caltrans when 2 such contract has been prepared by Caltrans and submitted to the City for execution by such 3 authorized representative. o N 4 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY 6 Z 5 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AS W E 6 FOLLOWS: c d 7 Section 1. The Mayor and Common Council hereby finds and determines that the facts and E tv 8 circumstances set forth in the Recitals hereof are true and correct in all respects. 0 9 Section 2. The Mayor and Common Council hereby accept the CBTP Grant Program Funds E 10 as offered by Caltrans pursuant to the letter from Caltrans dated September 14, 2009, and further c v 11 authorizes the Mayor as the authorized representative of the City to execute the final form of such o 12 contract with Caltrans for the CBTP Grant Program Funds at such time as Caltrans submits the final Ln 13 form of such contract to the City for execution and delivery. The Council approves the form of the c 14 Sub-Recipient Agreement with the Agency in the form as attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and y d 15 authorizes the Mayor on behalf of the City to execute and deliver such Sub-Recipient Agreement M N 16 together with such non-substantive and technical changes to said Sub-Recipient Agreement for the M o, 0 17 use and administration of the CBTP Grant Program Funds for the development of a TOD Overlay N 6 Z 18 District within the City. o w 19 Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption and execution in the manner 0 N d 20 as required by the City Charter. m 21 /// c aw 22 /// r U A 23 24 E 25 x a 26 27 28 2 P.UgeMetVtewlutiauVtewlutiwut2W9�10.19 a19 CHT SubR iPimt Agf Mmt MCC Rao.doc `"Pickijt,0.146 6.E.c 2009-342 1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING CERTAIN AGREEMENTS 2 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE (1) AN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY AND CALTRANS FOR COMMUNITY- 3 BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ("CBTP") GRANT PROGRAM N 4 FUNDS AND (2) A SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN z° 5 BERNARDINO ("AGENCY")AND THE CITY E 6 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and r E 7 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a joint regular meeting a d v 8 thereof,held on the 19th day of October 2009,by the following vote to wit: c° c 9 Council Members: Ayes Nays Abstain Absent E Q. 0 10 ESTRADA x d 11 BAXTER x °• 12 BRINKER x c 13 SHORETT x — 0 14 KELLEY x d 15 JOHNSON x N V 16 MC CAMMACK x 0 17 N �-+ Z 18 Rach G. Clark, City Clerk o 19 0 N 20 The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this a1 day of October 2009. Er m 21 c E 22 Patrick Morris,Mayor m 23 Cityofgan Bernardino a c 24 E 25 Approved as to Form: C a 26 .o. BY: r F 27 James F. Penman, City Attorney 28 3 P:Lkp d&Vt ImionsV4wl tionst W9\10.I M9 CBTP SubR¢pient Agmment MCC Rem Packet Pg. 147 2009-342 1 EXHIBIT "A" 2 SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT 3 0 N r 4 c Z 5 c d E 6 c v E 7 Q tv v 8 0 U c 9 E CL 10 2 m 11 ° �o 12 13 c 0 14 " m 15 N a 16 0 0 17 N 6 Z 18 `o 0 19 c N d 20 m 21 c m 22 L U 23 a 24 E L 25 m 26 27 28 4 P9 pnduV WtionsV cwlouonsUW 10.19-0 CBT Su-B jpirnt Ag mme t MCC Pem doc Packet Pg`448 CDC/2009-62 • (2009-342) 0 N O TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT ? SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT 0 -0 c d BY AND BETWEEN a p, 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO v d AND a 0 d m REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO v Lo c 0 N W N M cn O O N O Z c O O N d m w C w L U A Q C d E t U to 2: Q 4832-3636-9156.2832-3636-9156.1 P:Npendw%Apsnd$Aftad %Apanda Atladimenl%V"s-Am 2W9110.78-%CSTP Sub RecipisM Agr nitloc R v.L CDC/2009-62 ( 2009'342) Community Based Transportation Planning Grant Sub-recipient Agreement 0 This Agreement is entered into this 19th day of October,2009("Agreement"),by and between the City of San Bernardino,a charter city and municipal corporation established and existing pursuant to the d Constitution of the State of California,hereinafter referred to as the"City"and the Redevelopment Agency Z of the City of San Bernardino,a public body,corporate and politic,hereinafter referred to as the"Agency" E or the"Sub-recipient"and may be collectively referred to as"Parties"or individually referred to as"Party" c in this Agreement. w E a WITNESSETH v 0 U WHEREAS, the City has been awarded a grant in the amount of$250,000 from the State of d California Department of Transportation("Caltrans")for the Community Based Transportation Planning E 0. Grant("Grant"); and 0 d v WHEREAS,the City and the Sub-recipient have an interest in providing necessary services to and enhancement of the quality of life of its citizens; and v LO WHEREAS, the City and the Sub-recipient recognize that the project herein is eligible under applicable Caltrans regulations; and `o 0 WHEREAS, the City and the Sub-recipient desire to cooperate in the implementation of the Program by reason of experience, preparation, organization, staffmg and facilities to provide for the N development of a transit oriented development("TOD")overlay district within portions of the City; and M on 0 WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino ("Council") P0, recognize the need to promote mass transit,the planning and funding of various transportation projects z6 and the implementation of TOD which together will play a major role in the future revitalization efforts to 0 be undertaken by the Sub-recipient both within the downtown area and in other appropriate areas of the 5 City; and o N d WHEREAS,the Agency recognizes the benefits to be derived from receiving Community Based Transportation Planning Grant Program Funds("Program Funds"); and 00 C d WHEREAS,the Program Funds are made available by Caltrans to encourage livable/sustainable community concepts with a transportation or mobility objective and promote community identity and R quality of life,and the City is eligible to apply to Caltrans for such Program Funds and to then make them a available for administration and use by the Agency as a sub-recipient of the Community Based d Transportation Planning application("CBTP Application") of the City; and E v WHEREAS,on March 16,2009,the Council authorized the submittal of a CBTP Application for a the development of a TOD overlay district; and WHEREAS, the City was denoted as the award recipient and the Agency as the sub—recipient pursuant to such CBTP Application; and 4832-3636.9156.2832-3636-9156.1 2 P:ft&ndwUBenda AnadN ntsWgenda Aa2dvrwft'A"s Amerd 2W8Na19-M CBTP sub Rx MW Apreomarad PaC:. .�:•`s CDC/2009-62 (2009-342) WHEREAS, before an assistance agreement between the City and Caltrans can be executed, an agreement between the City and the Agency must be duly approved and executed. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and the mutual c benefits to be derived therefrom,the parties agree as follows: 6 OPERATIVE PROVISIONS ? c d 1. Incorporation of Recitals d The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as a though fully set forth herein. o U 2. Sub-recipient's Name d E CL The name of the Sub-recipient is identified as the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San —0 Bernardino. Any substitution of name shall require a majority vote of the Sub-recipient's o governing body being the Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino (the "Commission") and approved by the Council on behalf of the City. LO 3. Supervision of Sub-recipient r c 0 A. The individuals designated in Exhibit`B",hereinafter referred to as"City Staff',shall be .T responsible for the direction of any work to be performed by Sub-recipient and any other consultants or sub-consultants to the Agency under this Agreement. The Sub-recipient shall not undertake any work under the terms of this Agreement,unless instructed to do so M by one of the designated City Staff members. No other staff member is authorized by the o City to request services from Sub-recipient. N 6 Z B. The Sub-recipient may be required to obtain approvals from the Commission for its o activities affecting the procurement of third party services and without any further approval by the Council. 4. Organization of Sub-recipient ao c A. The Sub-recipient's role in this Agreement is to procure services related to the development E of a TOD overlay district and the administration of the Grant. m B. Sub-recipient Administration. a c d i. The Sub-recipient is identified as the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San E Bernardino. General legal counsel shall be provided by the Agency's existing counsel and the office of the City Attorney of the City. a 4832-3636.9156.2832-3636-9156.1 3 P:VpendeMge AtledarrnbN9ende AtlachmenbNprmta,&nw 20M 10.19-09 CSTP Sub Recipient A9reemeM.doe Pa 51 CDC/2009-62 (2009-342) 5. Sub-recipient Funding and Support The City has adopted Resolution No. _, dated October 19, 2009 authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Caltrans to receive the following funds which shall be made available to b the Sub-recipient to fund the procurement of professional services related to the development of a N TOD overlay district and the administration of the Program. d Z Initial amounts allocated to Sub-recipient: d E Source of Funds: Dollar Amount: E a Grant $250,000 0 U 6. Scope of Sub-recipient Services E E CL The Sub-recipient's scope of services pursuant to this Agreement is to procure third party —0 consultant services related to the development of a TOD overlay district and the administration of d the Grant. The Sub-recipient shall perform the services as set forth in Exhibit"A"attached hereto °. and by this reference made a part hereof within the time periods set forth therein. LO 7. Time of Performance C 0 Said services of the Sub-recipient are to commence on or about February 1, 2010, or as soon as 2 practicable thereafter upon execution of an appropriate contract with Calttans, whichever is the first to occur (the "Effective Date"), and shall continue in full force and effect through and N including February 28, 2012. M o? 0 8. Initial Capital Allocation N 6 Z The Sub-recipient shall be funded through an allocation of$250,000, as indicated by the Grant c amounts delineated in Section 5. S 0 9. Record Retention d m Records,maps,field notes and supporting documents and all other records pertaining to the use of Program Funds disbursed to the Sub-recipient hereunder shall be retained by the Sub-recipient and E available to the City for examination and for purposes of performing an audit for a period of five cLi (5) years from the date of expiration or termination of this Agreement or for a longer period, as required by law. Such records shall be available to the City and to appropriate county, state or a federal agencies and officials for inspection during the regular business hours of the Sub-recipient. d If the Sub-recipient does not maintain regular business hours,then such records shall be available E for inspection between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding federal A and state government holidays. In the event of litigation or an audit relating to this Agreement or a funds paid to the Sub-recipient by the City under this Agreement,such records shall be retained by the Sub-recipient until all such litigation or audit has been resolved. 4832.3636-9156.2832-3636.9156.1 4 P:04. 8%AcwwAffad .m ft� Analm \AyinAn d20MIO-1soacera Sub a«pia A fte .ate PBGk @t .:752. - ..r CDC/2009-62 (2009-342) 10. Use of Allocated Funds Program Funds shall be used for the purposes set forth in Section 6. 11. Accounting o N r A. The Sub-recipient shall establish and maintain on a current basis a adequate accrual z6 accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,practices, c and standards. E B. At all times,the Chief Financial Officer of the Agency shall maintain the financial books E and records of the Sub-Recipient to be established pursuant to this Agreement and d maintained by the Agency separate and apart from other Agency financial records and shall c set forth all financial activity hereunder as a separate line item in the annual budget of the Agency. E CL 12. Regular Reporting Requirements —,°, d 0 The Sub-recipient shall follow the Caltrans Grant agreement procedures and requirements for reporting and provide periodic reporting and the monitoring of compliance regarding the LO expenditures of the Program Funds for all purposes of this Agreement. =- 13. Authority to Enter Into Agreements o N .j The Sub-recipient may not enter into any third party service agreement except with the prior approval of the Commission. Such approval may be granted only at a noticed public meeting of N the Commission. M o� 0 0 14. Compliance with Laws and Assurances N 6 z The Sub-recipient hereby assures and certifies that it has complied and will continue to comply `o with the provisions of the Grant agreement of the City with Caltrans and all applicable federal, state,and local laws,ordinances,regulations,policies,guidelines,and requirements as they relate °N to acceptance and use of funds for this state-assisted Program. W 15. Affirmative Action m c d E The Sub-recipient shall make every effort to ensure that all projects funded wholly or in part by R Program Funds shall provide equal employment and career advancement opportunities for a minorities and women. C W 16. Discrimination E t u m A. No person shall, on the grounds of race, sex, creed, color, religion or national origin, be a excluded from participating in, be refused the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination in any activities,programs, or employment supported by this Agreement. 4832-3636-9156.2832-3636-9156.1 5 RfterdeslAgende Aftsch nlsN9enda Allachmen ftnnt-Ame 20MI O-19-09 CBTP Su Ra pienl"mm doc r Pack#tfg j 53 ..< CDC/2009-62 6.E.c (2009-342) B. The Sub-recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, natural origin, ancestry, sex, marital status or physical handicap in the performance of the Scope of Services of this Agreement. Without limitation, the Sub- recipient hereby certifies that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for b employment because of race, color,religion, sex,marital status or national origin. 6 17. Changes in Grant Allocation z M d The City, through the Council, may grant additional funds at its discretion for use by the Sub- a recipient to assure the successful completion of the Program. E a 18. Notices 0 0 U All notices herein required shall be in writing. Notices shall be sent by prepaid First Class Mail to d the following Address: o 0 m To the City: City of San Bernardino d Attention: Charles McNeely, City Manager °. 300 North"D" Street e San Bernardino, California 92418 ,r' Phone: (909) 384-5122 Fax: (909) 384-5138 c A To the Sub-recipient: Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino Attention: Emil A. Marzullo, Interim Executive Director N 201 North"E" Street, Suite 301 San Bernardino, California 92401 0 Phone: (909)663-1044 N Fax: (909) 888-9413 z° r_ 0 19. Assignment S 0 This Agreement is not assignable by the Sub-recipient without the express prior written consent of the City, which consent shall be given in the City's sole discretion. Any attempt by the Sub- recipient to assign any performance of the terms of this Agreement shall be null and void and shall 00 constitute a material breach of this Agreement upon the occurrence of which the City may,among its other remedies, and without limitation or prior notice, cancel, terminate or suspend thi E s E Agreement. a 20. Termination d E r (a) This Agreement may be terminated at any time by either Party upon giving thirty(30)day notice in writing to the other Party. a 4832-3636-9156.2832-3636-9156.1 6 P:WpendesVtpeWsAtledr s%Agm,dm Aft9& entsUpmASdenend 20=10-19-0B CBTP SSA Redpient Agra nt.dm Packet6. 154.; CDC/2009-62 6.E.c (2009-342) 21. Release. Indemnification. and Hold Harmless The Sub-recipient shall defend (if requested by the City), release, indemnify and hold the City, their officers, officials,attorneys, agents, employees, and volunteers, harmless from and against o any loss,liability,claim,or damages that may arise or result from activities ofthe Sub-recipient,its officers, agents, and employees and, shall, at its own costs,expense and risk,defend any and all 6 legal proceedings that may be brought against the City on any claim,demand,or alleged liability, and shall satisfy any settlement or judgment that may be rendered against any of them arising or E resulting from activities of the Sub-recipient hereunder,and shall assume liability for any and all a direct expense incurred in providing services pursuant to this Agreement and shall assume any and E all responsibilities for loss or damage resulting from negligence,injury,illness or disease arising a out of the provision of services. The City, however, is obligated to promptly notify the Sub- 0 recipient in writing of any such claim of loss or damage. U c m 22. Insurance Requirements E CL 0 0 The Sub-recipient shall secure and maintain throughout the term of the Agreement the following m types of insurance with limits as shown: °. LO e A. Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance. The Sub-recipient shall require the carriers of this coverage to waive all rights of subrogation against the City,its officers,volunteers, R employees,contractors and subcontractors. The Sub-recipient shall maintain all California `o statutory requirements to a One Million Dollars($1,000,000) limit. N m B. Comprehensive General and Automobile Liability Insurance. The Sub-recipient shall N obtain general liability insurance on a per occurrence basis with a combined single limit of M One Million Dollars($1,000,000);and automobile liability insurance for owned,hired and o non-owned vehicles on a per occurrence basis with a combined single limit of One Million N Dollars ($1,000,000). Additional insured endorsements are required for general and z6 automobile liability policy coverage. c 0 Additional insured shall be listed as: 0 d "The City , its officers, officials, attorneys, agents,employees and volunteers" o0 c C. Other Requirements and Acceptable Proof of Insurance. d E r U i. All insurance coverage must be maintained throughout the duration of this x Agreement. a ii. Insurance companies must have an A.M. Best Rating of B+VII or better. E s iii. Policy deductibles must be stated for each coverage. Deductibles greater than Five Thousand Dollars($5,000)must include a letter of credit. a iv. Acceptable Proof of Insurance: 4832-3636-9156.2832-3636-9156.1 7 PMA a SU9endeAltarhnwnb&p AttxHnentsftm -Amend 2009110.19-09 CBTP SW Recipient A9reem mdoc Packet P.g.,4 CDC/2009-62 6.E.c (2009-342) a. A Certificate of Insurance listing all coverage, limits, deductibles and insurers; and blanket endorsements for all applicable coverage if agent has authority to issue it;or b. Binders of insurance for all coverage. Agents must confirm that policy N endorsements have been ordered from the respective insurance companies. Upon issuance, policy endorsements and a corresponding Certificate of Z Insurance listing all insurers and coverage must be submitted to the City. v E n (NOTE: Insurance binders are only valid for thirty(30)days and may need to be reissued if the policy endorsements are still pending. Binders may be issued for a maximum of three,thirty(30)day periods.) 0 U The Sub-recipient shall furnish certified copies of all policies and endorsements to the City, evidencing the insurance coverage above required,five business days prior to the commencement E of performance of services hereunder,which certificates shall provide that such insurance shall not $ be terminated or expire without thirty(3 0)day prior written notice to the City,and shall maintain d such insurance from the time the Sub-recipient commences performance of services hereunder, 0 until the completion of such services. An inventory of such insurance shall be completed by the Sub-recipient and approved by the City prior to the commencement of performance of services hereunder. All policies, with respect to the insurance coverage required above, except for the worker's 2 compensation coverage, shall contain additional insured endorsements naming the City and its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional name insured, with respect to liabilities arising out of the performance of services hereunder. M 23. Conflict of Interest 0 0 N The Sub-recipient,its agents and employees shall comply with all applicable federal,state,county z6 and City laws and regulations governing conflict of interest. To this end,the Sub-recipient will c make available or shall provide copies of all applicable federal, state, county and City laws and regulations governing conflict of interest,to its agents and employees. y a 24. Program Monitoring m The City will monitor the Sub-recipient in the performance of this Agreement. The Sub-recipient a� shall maintain such property,personnel,financial and other records and accounts as are considered E necessary by Caltrans and the City to assure proper accounting for all Program Funds authorized 2 under this Agreement. The Sub-recipient shall permit on-site inspection by the City and/or a Caltrans representatives, and ensure that its employees and board members furnish such c information, as in the judgment of the City and Caltrans, may be relevant to a question of E compliance with contractual conditions and Caltrans directives,or the effectiveness,legality,and achievements of the Program. All the Sub-recipient records, with the exception of confidential a client information, shall be made available to representatives of the City and appropriate state agencies. The City Manager or his/her designee will conduct periodic Program progress reviews. These reviews will focus on the extent to which the planned Program has been implemented and measurable goals achieved, the effectiveness of Program management, and the impact of the Program. 4832-3636-91562832-3636-9156.1 8 P:NpndssXApendaAltWtm %AgendaN9aMmeM%A"s-M*M20=1019-09 CUP SubRepentApnemeixtloc PacketPg. 756 CDC/2009-62 (2009-342) 25. Religious Proselytizing or Political Activities The Sub-recipient agrees that it will not perform or permit any religious proselytizing or political activities in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Program Funds under this o Agreement will be used exclusively for performance of the services required under this Agreement and no funds shall be used to promote any religious or political activities. z6 26. Audits E c The Sub-recipient may be required pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Program Funds to E arrange for an independent financial and compliance audit annually for each fiscal year funds are received under this Agreement. An audit may also be conducted by State or local funding source c agencies as part of the City's audit responsibilities. The results of the independent audit must be v submitted to the City within thirty (30) days after completion. Within thirty (30) days after the v submittal of audit report, the Sub-recipient shall provide a written response to all conditions or o findings reported in said audit report. The response must examine each condition or finding and explain a proposed resolution,including a schedule for correcting any deficiency,within six (6) o months after receipt of the audit report. The City and the Agency, and their authorized representatives shall,at all times,have access for the purpose of audit or inspection to any and all I books, documents,papers,records,property, and premises of the Sub-recipient,whose staff will cooperate fully with authorized auditors when they conduct audits and examinations of the C Program. p .y 27. Counterparts N This Agreement may be executed in three(3)counterparts.When executed,each counterpart shall ? be deemed an original,irrespective of date of execution. Said counterparts shall together constitute c one and the same Agreement. N 6 Z 28. Severability c Y Each and every section of this Agreement shall be construed as a separate and independent m covenant and agreement. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to 0: certain circumstances shall be declared invalid or unenforceable,the remainder of this Agreement, m or the application of such term or provision to circumstances other than those to which it is c declared invalid or unenforceable,shall not be affected thereby,and each term and provision of this E Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. m 29. Amendment or Modification a c m This Agreement may only be modified or amended by written instrument duly approved and s executed by each of the Parties hereto. Any such modification or amendment shall be valid, R binding and legally enforceable only if in written form and executed by each of the Parties hereto, a following all necessary approvals and authorizations for such execution. 4832-3636-9156.2832-3636.9156.1 9 P 1A9endaalepanda AderhmMft A9entla AMadvI nWLVmte-Amar1d 20 0911 0.1 9-09 CBTP Bub RedpieM Agreament.dx Packet°Pg. 157 CDC/2009-62 (2009-342) 30. Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of California o in and for the County of San Bernardino. A 6 31. Compliance with Law ? C d The Sub-recipient shall comply with all local,state and federal laws,including,but not limited to, environmental acts, rules and regulations applicable to the work to be performed by the Sub- recipient under this Agreement. The Sub-recipient shall maintain all necessary licenses and registrations for the lawful performance of the work required of the Sub-recipient under this c Agreement. L) C d 32. Non-Waiver E CL 0 Failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of d the right to compel enforcement of the same provision or any remaining provisions of this Agreement. 33. Representations of Persons Executing the Agreement 0 The persons executing this Agreement warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of and bind the respective Party that each purports to represent. 34. Press Releases v M M O Press or news releases, including photographs or public announcements, or confirmation of the N same related to the work to be performed by the Sub-recipient under this Agreement shall only be z6 made by the Sub-recipient with the prior written consent of the City. c 0 35. Default and Remedies o d A. Events of Default The occurrence of any of the following shall, after the giving of any notice described 00 therein, constitute a default by Sub-recipient hereunder("Event of Default'): E i. The failure of Sub-recipient to pay or perform any monetary covenant or obligation w hereunder or any of the documents executed in connection herewith,without curing a such failure within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of written notice of such r default from the City (or from any party authorized by the City to deliver such E notice as identified by the City in writing to Sub-recipient); a ii. The failure of Sub-recipient to perform any nonmonetary covenant or obligation hereunder or any of the documents executed in connection herewith,without curing such failure within thirty(30)calendar days after receipt of written notice of such default from the City (or from any party authorized by the City to deliver such notice as identified by the City in writing to Sub-recipient)specifying the nature of 4832-3636-9156.2832.3636.9156.1 10 P:%gKW VQende ABecimaeelAPe AttncAtme \AWMWA 2009110.19-09 CBTP Sub Redpient Ag"e .tl s ' PacketR 7158.. CDC/2009-62 s.E.c (2009-342) the event or deficiency giving rise to the default and the action required to cure such deficiency; provided, however, that if any default with respect to a nonmonetary obligation is such that it cannot be cured within a thirty-day period,it shall be deemed cured if Sub-recipient commences the cure within said thirty-day : period and diligently prosecutes such cure to completion thereafter. 6 B. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary,the herein described notice requirements Z and cure periods shall not apply to any Event of Default described in the following sentence. Voluntary cessation of the operation of the Project for a continuous period of c more than thirty (30) calendar days or the involuntary cessation of the operation of the E Project in accordance with this Agreement for a continuous period of more than sixty(60) a calendar days,unless such cessation is approved, in writing,by the City. 0 U C. Any failure or delay by a party in asserting any of its rights or remedies as to any default d shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any rights or remedies associated with a a default. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in 2 this Agreement,the rights and remedies of the Parties under this Agreement are cumulative d and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the LO same default or any other default by the other Party. D. The City's Remedies `o Without any prejudice to the other rights of the City pursuant to Section 20, upon the N occurrence of an Event of Default hereunder,the City, or an agent of the City,may,in its W sole discretion,take any one or more of the following actions: N a M i. By notice to Sub-recipient declare that the entire unused amount of the Program c Funds must be immediately repaid to the City,and the same shall become due and N payable without further demand,protest or further notice of any kind,all of which z6 are expressly waived; c ii. Subject to any nonrecourse provisions in this Agreement,take any and all actions 0 and do any and all things which are allowed, permitted or provided by law, in equity or by statute, to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, n agreement or covenant of the Sub-recipient under this Agreement or under any other document executed in connection herewith; M iii. Cease allowing Sub-recipient access to any Program Funds unless and until the .0 0, Event of Default(if curable) is cured; a c iv. Demand reimbursement from the Sub-recipient for any payments made to it by the r City for which the contracted work product was not satisfactorily delivered by the Sub-recipient; a V. Confiscate any material or other work product purchased or produced by the Sub- recipient for the Project; 4832-3636-91562832.3636-9156.1 P:%Apnd@sA da Athrhmentefta AttaMmenteXAWm Amend 2009110-19-09 CBTP Su Recipient AgreemaM.tloc Packet Pg."t59 CDC/2009-62 fi.E.c . (2009-342) vi. Take any and all actions and do any and all things which are allowed,permitted or provided by law,in equity or by statute,to enforce performance and observance of any obligation,agreement or covenant of the Sub-recipient under this Agreement or under any other document executed in connection herewith. o N I E. City Default and Sub-recipient's Remedies c Upon fault or failure of the City to meet any of its obligations under this Agreement z without curing such failure within thirty(30)calendar days after receipt of written notice of E such failure from Sub-recipient specifying the nature of the event or deficiency giving rise c to the default and the action required to cure such deficiency,Sub-recipient may,as its sole E and exclusive remedies: a w 0 i. Bring an action in equitable relief seeking the specific performance by the City of c0) the terms and conditions of this Agreement or seeking to enjoin any act by the City which is prohibited hereunder; and/or o 0 ii. Bring an action for declaratory relief seeking judicial determination of the meaning w of any provision of this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Sub-recipient shall in no event be entitled to, and hereby waives, any right to seek indirect or consequential damages of any kind or nature from the City arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, and in connection with such waiver Sub-recipient is familiar with and hereby waives the provisions of Section c 1542 of the California Civil Code which provides as follows: "A GENERAL .7 RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES (D NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF N EXECUTING THE RELEASE WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE M MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR." c N N 36. Consequential Damaees and Limitation of Liability c z C The City and the Sub-recipient agree that except as otherwise provided in this Section 36, in no °- .7 event will either be liable to the other under this Agreement for any damages including but not o limited to,special damages,loss of revenue,loss of profit,operating costs or business interruption losses, regardless of cause, including breach of contract,negligence, strict liability or otherwise. The limitations and exclusions of liability set forth in this Section 36 shall apply regardless of fault, m breach of contract, tort, strict liability or otherwise of the Sub-recipient and the City, their E employees or subconsultants. to V 37. Leval Proceedings c m Should any legal proceedings be commenced to enforce,enjoin,or collect funds or otherwise affect E this agreement between the Parties,it shall be filed in San Bernardino County Superior Court. The 0, prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable legal fees. The costs, salary and a expenses of the City Attorney and members of his office in enforcing this Agreement on behalf of the City shall be considered as"legal fees"for the purposes of this paragraph. 4832-3636.9156.2832.3636-9156.1 12 P:VVendaalApenda Attedlmenlftmlla Atledt s%Aw� 200%1019 CBTP Bub Recipient Ayreement,tl Pack fP " CDC/2009-62 B.E.c ' (2009-342) 38. Exhibits The Exhibits to this Agreement, indicated as Exhibits "A" and `B", are an integral part of this Agreement and have each been incorporated herein. The Agreement shall not become effective g until such time as the Sub-recipient has properly filled out and fully executed each Exhibit to this Agreement, as required, and the Interim Executive Director or his designee has reviewed and z6 approved the form and content of each Exhibit. v E 39. Entire Agreement v C d E This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes a all prior negotiation, discussions and agreements between the Parties concerning the subject o matters covered herein. The Parties intend this Agreement to be the final expression of their agreement with respect to the subjects covered herein and a complete and exclusive statement of d such terms. E CL 0 m 0 C 0 w d tr d M O N Z C 0 0 N m C 0 E A r C d E L V 4832-3636-91562832-3636-9156.1 13 P'.Ugelal twldaAtlatl�%Agw&Atb3imeNelApanWa ea 20 1U19L9 CBTP Sub Redpl ApreemM 1., t �.. S.E.c CDC/2009-62 (2009-342) IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first written above. CITY City of San Bernardino, a charter city N 0 z By: d Patrick J. Morris, Mayor E c w E Q Approved as to Form: 0 U V 11 C E City Attorney o m m 0 SUBRECIPIENT Ln Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, a public body, corporate and politic m D: N By: M Emil A. Marzullo, Interim Executive Director o, 0 0 N O z C Approved as to Form: 0_ 0 m By: Agency Counsel m c d E t U A w Q C d E r 0 M V a 4832-3636-9156.2832-3636-9156.1 14 P--.IA9endasiAgenda AttachmenwiA9eMe Attechmen151Agerne-Amend 2(Ml 194)9 CBTP Sub Recipient Agreement doc re CDC/2009-62 ( 2009-342) IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first written above. CITY _ T 0 City of San Bernardino, a charter city 6 z By: v Patrick . Morris, Mayor d E Q Approved as to Form: o U c m By: a City Attorney d m 0 �o a SUBRECIPIENT Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, c a public body, corporate and politic u, v N By: M Emil A. Marzullo, Interim Executive Director 0 N N 6 z c 0 Approved as to Form: 5 0 N gl By: Agency Co el m c m E r v to NOTE: SIGNED COUNTERPART RETAIN ALL (2) ORIGINAL SIGNATURE PAGES a « c d E t v m « Q 4832-3636-9156.2832-3636-9156.1 14 P:1AgenAaelA9entla Attatlnnenl XAg8nda Aftad Mgrm"me 2009/10.19 09 CBTP Sub Recipient Agmm m.c0c Pac1i� ;g.�63 CDC/2009-62 6E.c (2009-342) EXHIBIT"A" Scope of Services Sub-recipient shall be responsible for carrying out the following City activities: procurement of services N related to the development of a TOD overlay district and the administration of the Grant. The Program c shall be carried out in a manner satisfactory to the City and consistent with this Agreement, any ? amendments thereto and any standards required as a condition of providing the Program Funds. E a C d E Q d 0 O U C d E 0 0 m Ln m 0 <o v c 0 2 d N M O O N O Z C O Y 0 N d !Y m C N E r v R Q c m E t v m Y Q 4832-3636-9156.2832-3636-9156.1 1 5 R%Ag asWgn nnan�mavtnaeAnachmaa 9 -'Aeon2oom+aismcorn Sub Rmlpi ang,eam to Pagkos- 164 CDC/2009-62 6.Ec . (2009-342) EXHIBIT "B" Supervisory Staff Personnel O N O city Staff: Z C d Charles McNeely, c City Manager d E Terri Rahhal, v City Planner U C dd E C O d d D tD R N r r C O .y .j d lY N a M 01 O O N O Z C O 7 O N d m C 0 E r v R Q c d E t v m Q 4832.3636.9156.2832-3636-9156.1 16 P:%AUendw%Agend@AtlerMhr %Ag9rda Attecn MAgrmte-Amend 20MI0.19-0e CBTP Sub RepwM Apnemetdoc Packet Pg. 165 6.E.d ® ATTACHMENT C 0 June 15 and 16, 2011 Community Open House Meetings Z c v E [Available online at: www.sbcity.orel v Homepage>City Hall>Community Development>Planning>Transit Oriented Development(TOD) E d 0 0 U d E a 0 m d 0 c c 0 N v Of U C v w d r O N C t0 N d C 7 N Q� O Z m G .6 Q� U c m E z V A Q C © N E V IV Q Packet Pg. 166 6.E.e O N Attachment D r N E September 29, October 24, &November 9 Meeting Notes c Z [Available online at: www.sbeitLorg] o Homepage>City Hall>Community Development>Planning>Transit Oriented Development(TOD) v in N C O An O lr d U C 01 d w d q r O N O O O Z 1 � R 0 N d N r V 0 1 � NN 0 N w � y N d O I Z 0 c v c d E r v m a C d M v a Packet Pg. 167 6.E.f ATTACHMENT E TmnaRBtatlon Amps 7larWlDMkt �6Mry Rarereo mB RmKAay LoraU Pawl Plat SYZa Slay Aaas Ant ae Owrd " Ken099D4WAP2n AO g0.7D 3-1 B y + 7e P C B Kemowumaatlttla 81.06 60.9 18.02 O at KarxW Oral MqiM°„ ° R BB t. N R091t,"Md la go SLOW Areal R. Rm 0 z PfC + KaM6M aal aOBer&n 69.,43 bp1 0) KAs04va E RLs a v 5 C 0 / 89 1 E ON E61rtaG M1luattl 44.08 12 Q B4+ttvad R 6 1. Q1 0. 'a 0 + 204 60. (..1 c b.ea m ESh &WgNWAwm. VIA Ra 6 248 O_ Eevan R 10 3m O Neimboftm 99 9.90 z SktbllAnat a 2D.2B j WNW MWREMM O 70,70 ❑ qW BB 17.9 p a H a 0.40 E SlrealetltlaFS Raft 207.71 RM 1 188 BSBB R 1 26 437 R 1 0 t0 r oeaa O CR4 is U15 N 4 1 > astw&OMI&ta 226 619 N 8 Q R 4 512 Dosrntaan StaUm 65.59 � Aret4 D 02 N s 1c , 47 O S8fiui&P10bAve0 148.87 6 13AA7 N u 14 j629 0 7 15.14 d oa s Q C 4 11,40 0 UavaMp Pakxey a 1,40.17 1 66 are.. NoMPakea4ava0 1 e - y Calle/6htla1 8. N Areas � d Eau"tANorulmd Way 266.89 g Na4 ~di e w Trowu— 20,10 Coll 12 Sm d KotpY0Ny NUnit /71.90. 0 0 Lam s 26.48 m Hospts7ry Lena s0anagb ULM a• 000 920.61 _1 .`_ oe Q Empoyn tConta w t B StdW An C B 0) HDegltiy Lanes 1' u IRPPeoo4oaAV o 449.64 a8. ..�. H 02 R 7 Q R i PacketPg. 168 6.E.g ADDENDUM TO THE. SAN BERNARDINO 0 N GENERAL PLAN 6 z UPDATE AND d ASSOCIATED v c d SPECIFIC PLANS E d ENVIRONMENTAL o U Y IMPACTREPORT v E CL 0 d SCH NO. 2004111132 0 m v N r- .2 A W 7 a L7 m prepared for: v d w CITY OF SAN d BERNARDINO U 0 Contact: _ Margo Wheeler Community Development v Director a LL prepared by. c m E THE PLANNING L U CENTER 6 Q Contact: d Jorge Estrada E Associate Planner m O a JANUARY 2012 Packet Pg. 169 O O N r O 2 c d E v c d E Q d O U c d E CL O v d 0 co v LO N C O W 7 a t7 m m w d r d U O Y E c d n Q LL C d E L U R Q C d E L d W © Q 6.E.g ADDENDUM TO THE. SAN BERNARDINO R N GENERAL PLAN 0 z UPDATE AND v ASSOCIATED v c d SPECIFIC PLANS a v ENVIRONMENTAL o U IMPACT REPORT y E a O d SCH NO. 2004111132 0 co a N N C O N d tY W a c� m m prepared for: d w CITY OF SAN at BERNARDINO U O Community Development Department Contact: 0 300 North D Street, 3rd Floor Margo Wheeler c San Bernardino, CA 92408 Community Development a Tel., 909.384.5357 Director Q U. prepared by: E THE PLANNING CENTER Q 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Contact: Santa Ana, CA 92707 Jorge Estrada E Tel: 714.966.9220 •Fax: 714.966.9221 Associate Planner m E-mail:information @planningcenter.com C Website: www.planningcenter.com COSB-18.OL JANUARY 2012 PacketPg.171 O N O 2 C d E s c d E Q m 0 0 U c d E CL 0 m a 0 co v U) N 0 O N j : W 7 a (7 m N a T w r d U 0 E m -0 c m v v Q LL C d E s U Q i+ C d E s U A a P_ X172 6.E.g Table of Contents Section Pane ° N 6 1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1 z 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE......................................................................................................1 1.2 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM..........................................................................................1 E 1.3 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION...........................................................2 v 1.4 SCOPE OF SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS...............................................................................3 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.................................................................................................5 v 0 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION.........................................................................................................5 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING..............................................................................................5 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................45 0. 0 3.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND................................................................................................45 3.2 PROJECT PURPOSE........................................................................................................45 p 3.3 TRANSIT OVERLAY DISTRICT AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS............................46 3.4 EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN.......................................................................50 3.5 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS........................................................................................50 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST..........................................................................................51 N c 4.1 BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................51 0 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED...............................................52 4.3 DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY).................................52 4.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS...............................................................53 w 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.............................................................................................55 w EL EL 5.1 AESTHETICS ....................................................................................................................55 O 5.2 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES...................................................................58 co 5.3 AIR QUALITY.....................................................................................................................60 5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES..............................................................................................64 5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES.................................................................................................67 v 5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS.....................................................................................................70 c) 5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS....................................................................................75 0 5.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .....................................................................77 E 5.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY..............................................................................80 5.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING.............................................................................................86 5.11 MINERAL RESOURCES....................................................................................................87 a 5.12 NOISE...............................................................................................................................89 5.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING..........................................................................................92 U- 5.14 PUBLIC SERVICES...........................................................................................:...............94 d 5.15 RECREATION....................................................................................................................96 E 5.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC...........................................................................................98 5.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS..............................................................................103 Q 5.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE................................................................107 c 6. SUMMARY TABLE OF MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................111 E U 10 Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page i fi.E.g Table of Contents 0 7. REFERENCES....................................................................................................................117 7.1 PRINTED REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 117 z 7.2 WEB SITES..................................................................................................................... 117 Y c d E a c v E Q d 0 O U c d APPENDICES E CL 0 A. San Bernardino Development Code,Transit Overlay District Zoning Standards and Guidelines B. Existing General Land Use Designation by Station Area Exhibits p v N C O .N R' W a. a t7 m m v d d U O Y E v c d v s Q LL C d E t U R Y a d E .a 0 m Y Q Page ii The Planning Center January 2012 ..17d� Table of Contents List of Figures N I Figure Paste 6 c Figure 1 Regional Location.............................................................................................................15 a E Figure2 Local Vicinity.....................................................................................................................17 v Figure 3 Palm Avenue/Kendall Drive TD Boundary........................................................................19 Figure 4 University Parkway/Northpark Boulevard TD Boundary...................................................21 Figure 5 Little Mountain Drive/Kendall Drive TD Boundary.............................................................23 Figure 6 Shandon Hills Drive/Kendall Drive TD Boundary..............................................................25 0 Figure 7 Marshall Boulevard/E Street TD Boundary 27 9 ry....................................................................... Figure 8 Highland Avenue/E Street TD Boundary 29 Figure 9 Baseline Road/E Street TD Boundary...............................................................................31 EE CL Figure 10 Court Street/E Street TD Boundary..................................................................................33 0 Figure 11 Rialto Avenue/E Street TD Boundary................................................................................35 > Figure 12 North Mall Way/E Street TD Boundary.............................................................................37 0 Figure 13 Hunts Lane/West Hospitality Lane TD Boundary.............................................................39 Figure 14 Carnegie Drive/Hospitality Lane TD Boundary.................................................................41 -e Figure 15 Tippecanoe Avenue/Hospitality Lane TD Boundary.........................................................43 N C O N List of Tables w Table Page a O m Table 1 Existing General Plan Land Use Designations...................................................................5 m Table 2 General Plan Land Use Designations within Station Areas................................................9 m Table 3 New Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses............................................................47 r Table 4 Development Code and General Plan Residential Densities and Standards For Commercial Districts*.................................................................................................48 0 Table 5 Key Development Standards—Comparison of Current Code and TD Overlay..............................................................................................................................49 Table 6 Build-to Line Setback and Building Height Standards.....................................................50 Table 7 Summary of Mitigation Measures...................................................................................111 a LL C U E L U A C d E r U Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Page iii Packet Pg. 175 Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank. N 0 z C d E C d E Q d 0 O U c m E a 0 m d 0 v N r N 0 O .T .j d W 0. a U m U) v d w C d U 0 E v c d a Q LL C d E t U O Q w C d E r U A Q Page iv The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g 0 N 6 Z 1. Introduction E C N 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE E a This document is an Addendum to the previously certified City of San Bernardino General Plan Update and c Associated Specific Plans Environmental Impact Report(SBGPU EIR)(State Clearinghouse No.2004111132 v and Mayor and Common Council Resolution No. 2005-362). It serves as the environmental review for the proposed Transit Overlay District (TD) zoning designation and associated development standards and design guidelines for areas surrounding the cities transit stations.The TD and its regulations are proposed in o order to implement the City's General Plan policies promoting transit-oriented development within San Bernardino and apply to 13 individual transit stations along the San Bernardino bus rapid transit(sbX BRT) o corridor. The corridor spans approximately 15 miles between Loma Linda to the south and northern San Bernardino (Palm Street/Kendall Drive) to the north. LO This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to N CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines,the City of San Bernardino(City)is the Lead Agency charged with the o responsibility of deciding whether or not to approve the requested action. As part of the decision-making process,the City is required to review and consider the potential environmental effects that could result from v implementation of the proposed project. i w 1.2 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM n= 1.2.1 CEQA Requirements m w Pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Guidelines, the City's review of the d proposed project focuses on project modifications that could change the conclusions of the SBGPU EIR, and also any change in circumstances or new information of substantial importance that would substantially change the conclusions of the SBGPU EIR. o E Pursuant to Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines,when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project,no subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall be prepared for the project unless the lead agency determines that one or more of the following conditions are o a met: a u- • Substantial project changes are proposed that will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial E increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; m • Substantial changes would occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is Q undertaken that require major revisions to the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of d previously identified significant effects; or u U C a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page I k Packet Pg. 177 6.E.g 1 . Introduction • New information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with N the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified or the negative declaration was adopted shows any of the following: 6 A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative E declaration. v c m B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than identified in the E a previous EIR. 0 C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, c) and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project v proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. E CL 0 D. Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment,but o the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. v Preparation of an Addendum to an EIR is appropriate when none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 (above) are present, and where some minor technical changes to the previously certified EIR are N necessary. o .N After careful consideration of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project, the City of San Bernardino has determined that none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplement to an EIR have occurred and that an Addendum to the previously certified SBGPU EIR is the appropriate environmental clearance for the proposed project.This Addendum reviews the changes proposed by the w project and any changes to the existing conditions that have occurred since the SBGPU EIR was certified. It a also reviews any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been m known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the SBGPU EIR was certified. It further examines N whether, as a result of any changes or any new information, a subsequent EIR may be required. This 0 examination includes an analysis of the provisions of Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State w CEQA Guidelines and their applicability to the proposed project. U This Addendum relies on use of the attached Environmental Analysis, which addresses environmental ° checklist issues section by section. It also includes analysis of certain impacts that were not analyzed in the E SBGPU EIR.The additional analyses are appropriate for inclusion in the Addendum due to updates in the CEQA Guidelines, but none resulted in new or increased impacts that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 of the Guidelines. a The City of San Bernardino Environmental Checklist Form has been completed by the City and included in LL Section 4. The checklist includes findings as to the environmental effects of the proposed project in m comparison with the findings of the SBGPU EIR. E u m 1.3 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION a This Addendum relies on the environmental analysis in the SBGPU EIR,which was prepared to address the v environmental impacts associated with the General Plan Update and related actions including the University E District Specific Plan and the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan.The public review period for the SBGPU EIR cLi was from July 25,2005 to September 8,2005.The San Bernardino City Council certified the SBGPU EIR on November 5,2005,and adopted the General Plan Update and associated General Plan elements and land a Page 2 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 178 1. Introduction use plan.The land use designations denoted on the land use plan and the City's zoning map are one and ° N the same, as the land use plan was the basis for establishing the zoning designations. 0 This Addendum incorporates by reference all or portions of the SBGPU EIR and the technical/planning Z documents that relate to the proposed project or provide additional information concerning the E environmental setting of the proposed project. The information disclosed in this Addendum is based on 0 and/or incorporates by reference the following technical/planning documents: d E a • City of San Bernardino General Plan and Municipal Code 0 • City of San Bernardino Noise Ordinance(Chapter 8.54,Noise Control,of the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code) v E CL • City of San Bernardino General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report 0 • sbX E Street Corridor BRT Project Environmental Assessment/Initial Study o • Transit Overlay District Zoning Standards and Guidelines (Appendix A) u� These documents are available for review at the City of San Bernardino Community Development F Department, 300 North D Street, 3rd Floor, San Bernardino, California 92408. r 0 Mn 1.4 SCOPE OF SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS /'�! d 0: 01 The discretionary approval subject to CEQA is the approval of proposed changes to the San Bernardino = Development Code.Specifically,the project is the proposed Transit Overlay District(TD)zoning designation w and associated development standards and design guidelines for areas surrounding the City's transit a stations. The "scope" of the review for project-related impacts for this Addendum is limited to changes m between the original project(San Bernardino General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans),and the M requested modifications to the City's Development Code. As described in the 2005 General Plan Update,the City of San Bernardino's Development Code(Title 19 of r d the San Bernardino Municipal Code)was adopted in May 1991 and has been periodically revised since that time. In particular,the General Plan Land Use Element establishes the primary basis for consistency with the ° City's Development Code.The City's zoning map corresponds with the General Plan land use designations. E One or more of the zoning districts established in the City's Development Code corresponds to each of the '0 c General Plan land use designations. Since the General Plan land use designations and zoning under the m a Development Code are consistent (as substantiated in the Appendix 8,Zoning Consistency Matrix, of the 0 General Plan Update), by analyzing the proposed land use designations and allowable land uses,the EIR C prepared for the 2005 General Plan Update also analyzed the potential impacts of the Development Code. Moreover, the SBGPU EIR was prepared as a program EIR and it explicitly anticipated that it would be utilized for subsequent activities implementing the goal and policies of the 2005 General Plan Update, E including incorporation of "new provisions of the General Plan into the Development Code" (Executive Summary, page 1-4). a The previously certified environmental documentation and related approved mitigation for impacts associated with the SBGPU EIR serve as the "baseline" for the environmental impact analysis for the E proposed TO overlay and related development standards and design guidelines. The CEQA project, therefore, is the difference between this baseline and the proposed TD overlay. Section 3, Project Description,of this Addendum details the proposed TD overlay and the differences between existing zoning a within the transit station areas and the proposed overlay and development standards. Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 3 PacketPg. 179 1 . Introduction This page intentionally left blank. N 6 z c m E v c E v 0 0 U C d E Q O d d D N a N r N C O .y d W 7 a c� m y v m w r d U O Y E v c m v v LL Y C d E t v R Y a c m E r L) m Y ¢ Page 4 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 180 6.E.g 0 N 1 O Z 2. Environmental Setting E E 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION E v The project area consists of the areas surrounding 13 bus rapid transit(sbX)stations within the City of San o Bernardino, San Bernardino County. The City is located approximately 60 miles east of the City of Los v Angeles,at the southern base of the San Bernardino Mountains in the upper Santa Ana River Valley.The City is surrounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north,the cities of Highland to the east,Redlands E to the southeast, Loma Linda to the South,Colton to the southwest,and Rialto to the west.The 13 bus rapid o transit(sbX)station areas are generally located north of Interstate 10(1-10)and east of 1-215.The sbX station areas occur within a 12.8-mile corridor that spans between the northern end of the City to the southern end o along Kendall Drive,E Street and Hospitality Lane.Figure 1,Regional Location,and Figure 2,Local Vicinity, show the location of the project area within the regional and local contexts of San Bernardino County and the City of San Bernardino,respectively.Figures 3 through 15 show the boundaries of the 13 sbX station areas. N 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING c 0 N 2.2.1 Existing and Surrounding Land Use '> W The 13 sbX station areas that comprise the project area consist of a variety of existing land uses including W residential, commercial, retail, office, medical, civic, and institutional. Some of the sbX station areas also w include undeveloped parcels. For planning purposes,the transit stations have been categorized based on a neighborhood character,scale,and development patterns surrounding the stations.For reference purposes 0 the stations have been numbered 1-13 from north to south as indicated in Figure 2, Local Vicinity. The ca existing General Plan land use designations within the respective stations areas are depicted in exhibits m included in Appendix B. For reference, the land use designations within the transit station areas include those listed below in Table 1,Existing General Plan Land Use Designations. U O Table 1 E Existing General Plan Land Use Designations a Maximum Density(Units per Acre) Designation Name and Intensity(Floor Area Ratio) Intended Uses Q Residential Designations ' 4.5 dwelling units per acre(7,200 Single-family residences in a high quality LL RS Residential Suburban minimum lot size) suburban setting. d 9 dwelling units per acre(7,200 Single-multi-family attached and detached E RU Residential Urban minimum lot size;5,200 minimum lot residences,including townhomes,stacked @ size in planned unit developments) flats,courtyard homes,small lot subdivisions,and mobile home parks. Q c m E s U R Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 5 Packet Pg. 881 6.E.g 2. Environmental Setting Table 1 N Existing General Plan Land Use Des i nations Maximum Density(Units per Acre) 6 Designation Name and Intensity(Floor Area Ratio) Intended Uses Multifamily dwellings including townhomes, d E 14 dwellings units per acre(14,400 stacked flats,courtyards homes,apartments RM Residential Medium minimum lot size) and condominiums as well as small lot d single-family developments. E: Residential Medium 24 dwelling units per acre(20,000 Multifamily dwellings including apartments ¢ RMH High minimum lot size) and condominiums. o RH Residential High 36 dwelling units per acre(20,000 Multifamily dwellings including apartments minimum lot size) and condominiums. Commercial Desi nations Professional offices including financial,legal, c CO Commercial Office 1.0 floor area ratio insurance,medical,and other similar uses. _2 Local and regional serving retail,personal d CG-1 Commercial General 0.7 floor area ratio service,entertainment,office,related o commercial uses and limited residential uses with a CUP. a Local and regional serving retail,personal CG-2 Commercial General-2 1.0 floor area ratio service,entertainment,office,related commercial uses and limited residential uses N with a CUP. c Local and regional serving retail,personal w ® CG-3 Commercial General-3 1.0 floor area ratio service,entertainment,office,and related v commercial uses. X CCS-1 Central City South-1 1.0 floor area ratio Local and regional serving retail and service W uses. w CR-1 Commercial Regional- 1.5 floor area ratio Large scale,regional serving retail and a 1:Regional Malls service uses. A mixture of regional serving retail,service, Co Non-Residential Intensity—3.0 floor area office,outdoor dining,entertainment,cultural, a CR-2 Commercial Regional- ratio(4.0 floor area ratio if a vertical and residential uses that enhance the (, 2:Downtown mixed use project);Residential Density— downtown area as the functional and 54 dwellings per acre symbolic center of the City of San U Bernardino. A mixture of regional serving retail,service, ° tourist,office,entertainment,financial E 0.7 floor area ratio commercial;3.0 floor establishments,restaurants and supporting o Commercial Regional- outdoor dining,hotels/motels,research and CR-3 3:Tri-C ty Commercial area ratio hotels&offices;15.floor area ratio R&D development,high technology,business parks,warehouse/promotional retail,and ¢ supporting services uses that capitalize on u the location along the Interstate 10 corridor. Large scale regional serving retail and service m 0.7 floor area ratio; square feet uses limited commercial and industrial uses CH Commercial Heavy minimum lot size that are characterized by an extensive use of @ outdoor or indoor space for their sales, service,or storage. a commercial Desi nations Employee-intensive employment uses in a park-like setting,including research&and r DIP Office Industrial Park 1.0 floor area ratio development,corporate offices,"clean" industry and light manufacturing,and Q supporting retail. Page 6 •The Planning Center January 2012 PacketPg. 182 2. Environmental Setting Table 1 N Existin g General Plan Land Use Des i nations Maximum Density(Units per Acre) Z Designation Name and Intensity(Floor Area Ratio) Intended Uses Variety of light industrial uses,including w warehousing/distribution,assembly,light v manufacturing,research and development, c IL Industrial Light 0.75 floor area ratio m mini storage,and repair facilities conducted Q within enclosed structures as well as supporting retail and personal uses. Variety of intense industrial activities that U could potentially generate significant III Industrial Heavy 0.75 floor area ratio impacts,such as excessive noise,dust,and E other nuisances,such as rail yards and E CL multi-modal transportation centers. O Public Design ions > Public facilities,governmental institutions, p PF Public Facilities Not Applicable transportation facilities,public schools (K-12), public or private colleges and universities,museums,and public libraries. `n Intensive recreational uses,such as golf Public/Commercial Case-b courses,sports complexes,and fair grounds N PCR Recreation y-case basis as approved through the public review c process. n Source:City of San Bernardino 2005. rx Q ` . v The location of the existing General Plan land use designations listed above are also organized by station w area in Table 2, General Plan Land Use Designations within Station Areas. a (7 m N a d w t= d U O Y E c m v v Q LL C d E s v R a d E r m Y a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 7 6.E.g 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N r O Z C d E C d E Q m 0 0 U c d E 0. 0 LO d d 0 <o v N 0 O N d W IL IL m m y m r d U O E O 9 G d V Q LL C d E L U Q w C d E L O W Q Page 8 The Planning Center _'ul? Packet Pg. 184 s� ƒ ) Q ~ � � F 7 � \ \ % ! x . x R I - ` x x x ■ � @ x x } k2 a ( Ge • 3 � k ( ; @ , / LLI - 6 � 2 \ � k � § ] k % / / { aQ j ] � J ) - - § } \ £ a ! k $ § k £ | < , m \ J \ g # = t t | k ) w ] ! ® , f 2 ) Q ] cz - k k \ a \ / 2 \ m § d5l , T =a - . ��? \ x . � \ � \ G CL In k . k � ) k / \ \ { { f ƒ / « m ) § / { u } ) m 2. Environmental Setting The following are narrative descriptions of existing General Plan land use designations and existing land N uses in each station area. 6 Z Kendall Drive Neighborhood Station Areas d These station areas are predominantly residential areas with supporting neighborhood or community level a retail and services. v E • Palm Avenue/Kendall Drive(1)-The parcels within this station area are zoned General Commercial d (CG-1) and are currently used for retail and services use, characterized by fast-food enterprises. c 1-215 abuts this area to the south/southwest, beyond which is primarily vacant land. Low- and medium-density residential uses are situated north and northeast of the delineated transit station area. E a 0 • Kendall Drive/Little Mountain Drive (3) -The majority of parcels within this station area are zoned residential, including parcels zoned RS,RM,and RH.The station area includes a small area zoned o commercial (CG-1).The existing uses reflect these designations.The Shandin Hills Middle School athletic field is located to the east of the high-density multifamily use, and commercial uses are located south of the multifamily site. Single-family residential development characterizes the area north of the proposed transit station area boundary. N c • Kendall Drive/Shandin Hills Drive(4)-This station area includes parcels zoned RM,RMH,and CG-1. High-density residential uses abut similar uses to the north located within Station Area 3 (above). /�� Commercial uses include a grocery store and restaurants.To the east of existing medium density , . W residential is a large,vacant parcel designated for public use.Single-family residential lies beyond C47 W the boundaries of this station area on both sides of Kendall Drive. w a E Street Neighborhood Station Areas m m m These stations will provide access to neighborhoods and businesses on the E Street corridor north of 8th Street.The station areas are predominantly residential with supporting neighborhood or community level :t retail and services. d U • E Street and Marshall Boulevard (5)-This station area is linearly organized along E Street. Parcels within the station area are generally zoned Commercial General (CG-1)from I-210 to 33rd Street, E and Residential Medium(RM)from 34th Street to 36th Street.Existing residential uses include small, two-story apartment buildings, single-family homes, and vacant parcels. The commercial corridor features single-family homes,significant vacant lots at the Marshall Boulevard intersection,and very a few retail uses. LL • E Street and Highland Avenue(6)-This station area follows the east-west axis of Highland Avenue v and the north-south axis of E Street. Parcels adjacent to both streets are generally zoned for CG-1 E commercial uses. Off the main corridors,the station area includes small clusters of parcels zoned Commercial Office (CO), Residential Suburban (RS), Residential Urban (RU), Residential Medium Q High (RMH), and Residential High (RH). Existing uses along Highland and E Street are generally single-story commercial uses, with many buildings located directly adjacent to each-other on the v street, mixed with single-family residences and vacant lots. Areas outside the two corridors are E generally dominated by single-family residences except for a group of connected parcels between D Street and Arrowhead Avenue that feature small, 1-2 story office buildings. Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 11 6.E.g 2. Environmental Setting • Baseline Avenue and E Street (7) - This station area features a collection of parcels almost N identically zoned to those near Station 6, only organized along the intersecting streets of E Street and Baseline Road. This station area similarly features stretches of continuous single-story c commercial buildings, interspersed with parking lots and vacant parcels. E Street near 10th Street Z notably features a collection of used-car lots. Although D Street features some small-scale office 0 uses,surrounding uses are dominated by one-story single-family homes. C d Village/Urban Center Station Areas E d These two station areas contain a variety of neighborhood and community level retail uses and services, o along with some residential and public uses.Both station areas are dominated by a large,single institution. In northern San Bernardino,this area contains the California State University,San Bernardino campus(CSU San Bernardino). South of downtown, the area around Station 10 is centered on the Inland Center indoor a shopping mall. 0 d • University Parkway and Northpark Boulevard (2)-This station area is zoned Public Facilities (PF) p north east of Northpark Boulevard on the CSU San Bernardino campus. Southwest of Northpark Boulevard,parcels are zoned for commercial uses(CG-2 and CG-3)west of University Parkway and Commercial General (CG-1)and Residential Medium(RM)east of University.Existing land use in the station area is dominated by the university campus.Existing uses on parcels zoned CG-2 and CG-3 N across the street from the campus are primarily vacant,with one small-scale retail center located at c the intersection of University and Kendall Drive.East of University and south of the campus,existing N land uses consist of 2-3 story garden apartment communities and a vacant parcel. W • E Street and North Mall Way(10)-This station area is centered on a segment of E Street that runs W between entrances to the Inland Center indoor shopping mall,and the National Orange Show Event W Center. Parcels adjacent to the 1-215 freeway are zoned for Commercial Regional-Regional Malls. a Parcels underlying the National Orange Show Event Center are zoned Public/Commercial m Recreation (PCR). Parcels located on E Street between the two facilities are zoned CG-1. Existing w land uses on this corridor besides the mall and event center include auto-oriented businesses, '0 v furniture stores, vacant parcels, and a Target store at the intersection E Street and Orange Show w Road. a� U 0 Downtown Station Areas E Station areas located in downtown provide access to a mixed use district that includes government offices, n small businesses, large scale retail stores (including those within and near Carousel Mall), and the Arrowhead Credit Union Park baseball stadium. ° a E Street and Court Street(8)-Parcels within this station area are almost entirely zoned Commercial LL • Regional - Downtown (CR-2). Exceptions consist of a small group of parcels zoned Residential d Medium High(RMH)and half of a block zoned Public Facilities(PH).This second exception features E county offices.West of E Street,the station area is dominated by the Carousel Mall and the parking facilities that surround it, including surface parking and a garage. East of E Street features a widely a varying urban environment that includes mid-rise office towers, small-scale commercial uses, surface parking lots, and government facilities including City Hall. v E t U M © a Page 12 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 188 2. Environmental Setting • E Street and Rialto Avenue(9)-Parcels within this station area west of Stoddard Avenue are zoned N for commercial uses, including CG-1 uses north of Rialto Avenue and CCS-1 uses south of Rialto Avenue. East of Stoddard Avenue,parcels are zoned for a variety of uses,including Industrial Light c (IL) and Commercial Heavy (CH) south of Rialto, and Commercial Office (CO) north of Rialto Z Avenue.Existing uses are relatively similar to those zoned,with big-box retail stores located between E 2nd and Rialto,and smaller-scale retail distributed along E Street. East of E Street is dominated by v industrial uses but also features several large vacant parcels. The Arrowhead Credit Union Park d baseball stadium is located on parcels zoned CCS-1 directly west of E Street. E Q d Employment Center Station Areas o U Station areas in the Employment Center area are located within a commercial corridor with a low-scale,auto- dependent, suburban character. Land uses include office parks, big-box retail stores, and travel-related E 0. commercial uses such as lodging and restaurants. The corridor is adjacent to 1-10. o m • Hospitality lane and Hunts Lane(11)-The parcels within this station area are all zoned Commercial p Regional -Tri-City Commercial (CR-3). Existing land uses include motels and hotels, office parks, and free-standing restaurants.A large vacant parcel is located at the end of Sunwest Court. • Hospitality Lane and Carnegie Drive (12) - The parcels within this station area are all zoned N Commercial Regional-Tri-City Commercial(CR-3).Existing land uses include suburban-style office o buildings,free-standing restaurants such as Olive Garden,and a big-box retail center anchored by .2 The Home Depot. - • Hospitality Lane and Tippecanoe Avenue (13) -The parcels within this station area are primarily zoned Commercial Regional-Tri-City Commercial (CR-3)west of Tippecanoe.East of Tippecanoe, w parcels are zoned for Urban(RU), Medium (RM)and Medium High (RMH)residential uses. Parcels a are zoned for CG-1 commercial uses next to 1-10.The far northern part of the station area is zoned for industrial uses, including IH and OIP. Existing uses largely reflect the relevant zoning (n designations,with parcels west of Tippecanoe dominated by regional-scale retail stores including a Costco and Sam's Club, and parcels east of Tippecanoe consisting of a rural residential r neighborhood with single-story homes interspersed with vacant lots. Parcels north of the railway U feature warehouses and industrial vehicle-repair facilities. Large vacant parcels are located o throughout the station area. E c d v n Q LL C d E t U a E U C Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Page 13 Packet Pg. 189 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. N 6 z c d E v c m E Q d 0 O U r c d E Q O d w d a u� N C O N d CY W 7 IL C7 m v d w r m U O E 7 9 C d L Q LL C d E L U R Q C d E L O A Q Page 14 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 190 2. Environmental Setting Regional Location 4 N T O Z C d \ W " E c C E Q� I� O U E y p m N T .r ...� t San Bernardin—o -4 ^ X Highland d Fontana � Rla�to o X T - w SSD-�A a Santa Me River (7 d Colton U o I � I Loma – �d Co ry of San Bem qdno— L inda c Ct ,nfy ofRmersidel, i rraCe y LL r C d E t V R Q r C d E L V W Q – – – – Project Area o s Scale(Miles) Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center I DC&E • Figure 1 6;E.g 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. N 6 z c d E a c d E Q d 0 0 U c d E CL 0 d d 0 �o v N c O .y d W IL IL (7 m v v w r CD U 0 E n c m a Q LL w C d E 0 V N Q C d E L V A Q Page 16 The Planning Center Jawwq '0l3 Packet Pg. 192 6.E.g 2. Environmental Setting Local Vicinity o N r O Z ® c W E v c d Palm Avenue/ Q Kendall Dnve d w 1 0 O a U W c ® 2 ® E f 3 _ �a 4 m 0 LIPIe Mountain Drivel Marsha118oWevard/ '` Kendall Dnve 5 ESnee( Ln N s Highland Avenuel ,--� EStreet N C Baseline Road/ O N < EStreet '0 T Court Streetl d m 8 E S(reat Foothtl Blvd 9 San eemardino Lu in Ra'ndallll Ave Int.Alrpart „'. a. c7 10 co U) Rialto Avenuel ° L E St eet ) r.. Lugona Ave w �' North Mall way/ EStreet O E v c m a Hunts Lane/ L �cafnegleD�ve.l Tippecanoe Avenue l West Hospitality Lane Hospitality Lane LL C d E L V A 1 Station Q V C San Bernardino City Boundary w E r Project Area Q o a Basemap Source: Google Earth Pro 2011 Scale(Miles) Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center I DC&E • Figure 2 Packet Pg. 193 B:E.g 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. N r O 2 C d E C d E a a 0 U c v E CL 0 m d LOD v N C O 2 d W a. a 0 m N d w C d U O E C d 4 Q LL C d E z v m Q c d E s U M Q Page 18 The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g 3. Project Description Palm Avenue/Kendall Drive TD Boundary N r O C Z v \ E G d Q E v 0 O � U m E a 0 d 0 v N C O D) w W a a CD rn m w C v U tip o v c v Q E N ( U 10 Y Q r d £ t U N Q — — — Site Boundary o i,000 Scale(Feet) Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center I DC&E • Figure 3 Packet Pg. 195 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N O Z c a E a c d E Q d a 0 U c d E CL 0 v m 0 v N C O N d W IL IL C7 m y a d w r d U O E a C d a a Q LL C d E L u m Q c d E r u �a « Q Page 20 The Planning Center January 2012 INNOW 6.E.g 3. Project Description University Parkway/Northpark Boulevard o N TD Boundary z �a Canyon Lava, _ v D E a c m E 0 Q d a 0 U m E CL 0 ♦� ` ` California et University D of f San Be B erdrdino a 0 Q ® ` 1 � 0 N P& w o D a m a A2 m U r p ' E a c 1. a M: LL E a G al E U U m O Q Site Boundary o 1,000 Scale(Feet) Addendam to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center I DC&F. • Figure 4 Packet Pg. 197 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N O 2 Y c d E c d E Q m 0 U c N E C O d d O m v h N C O A d W 7 IL t7 m m w r d v 0 E a G Ol Q LL Y C d E r U A Y Y Q Y C d E U W © a Page 22 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 198 6.E.g 3. Project Description Little Mountain Drive/Kendall Drive s N TD Boundary z ® H111 E I, mill C v E Q O dry E ® — EMU s _ .. L ID ®� � N 7 O N 1 � d W m a. i— a mm — c9 D r m U O E J � '00 a LL C d E a C d E U U Q {V — Site Boundary o 1,000 M Scale Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center I DC&E • F! ure 5 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N O 2 c v E v c m E Q d v 0 U C d E O. O d d O v un N 0 O N d fY W 7 a U m U) v m w r d v 0 E v c m v v Q LL C d E 0 V N a. w Q C d E L U N V_ Q Page 24 The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g O3. Project Description Shandon Hills DrivelKendall Drive o N TD Boundary Z ITI—I C 1 d E 0 U 0 O a m o N IL IL m N m r m U o c Q ®� E a r E r a — — — Site Boundary 0 1,000 Scale(Feet) Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan SIR The Planning Center I DC&E • Fi g 6 6.E.g 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N O 2 C CD E r C d E Q N '0 O U c d E CL O v m 0 (o I th N C O V j d ru M IL m m a w C d U O E r C d 9 Q U- C d E r U A Q C d E r m M Q Page 26 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg.202 VIII •!'!�� � �• 117��,,`■ .. T:... ■- !In� ■= o on mm �� u■■ �I � -gllll `� ■_on ■11 ■■111= —1111■ "__ __ -- VIII _ -- _■ i����1■1111 -i�� MI. MEN, - `�.I'II• ■1�, 111 . �; =� _ __ _ in _v _ �IN1��/ �, L _. !C i■ ,. VIII —�_ __ —_ _—_ ° __ . N -. - - �. _._ -_- C— -- _■ —_- _ .IM -- . _� as _- _-_ -_ ■-i 1111■II�IIIL';:: R■ 11111 IS ._ —u MUM r■■ 1111■■ 1111 _� ___ ■_■ IZ —� _z _s —■ ■■1 � -m - _- -_,-- ■111 �■■�1 "Ir,• ■■ �, ■11111111111 IIIh�l4 .=.r =C �. ° �_� == 11111',1 ■11111111 ■■ IF■M __ �� ■m = __ no IIIIIIi11P 1111111111■ : -- -- - _N .. .. 111111111■ IIIIIIIIIIII X111111111 �IIi: ::. .nl� �� 11 ■11 1■■ _ � �1 IIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111111 :1111 �_ 111��#_;__ _• �■ IN IIIIIIIIIIR CI�IIIIIIII __ -_ _� _� �� == _ ■R = - == __ �. no -- - 111111 ..111111111 -= =_ :--■. __ -_ ,.- = 111111■ IIIIIIIII _°'"�= =1:111■ ■C _ rw -- p— - .-I._ =:111111■ ■IIIIIIIII =='a. ■■ e- -- ____ !__ m x;111111■ ■111111111 =_ �- � � :■R�'= �- �___ _°_ -_ 206 1111111. ■1111111► = 259—�� _� 111111■1. = —E -_ . 111111■ -111111111 a —�O � _.: _= 11111 = -°I ti N ■i■i1111. _� .� �_ i 1IIIIP 'll■11111 �� __ __ :■■__ -->t ■_ -- -- _� 11111■ ■IIIIIIII �__ -_-_ _I_- _•_ ■_� � •_? - •__ __ __ . � _ � � �� �� �_ a �� � �—.�� �■ .. -- _— C. •. too , J s.E.g 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N 1 O Z C d E C d E Q W O U c d E a O Lnd m 0 v N C O .T CD lr W 7 IL U m U) m w r m U O E 7 C d V Q LL C d E r V R Y Q V C d E L V A Q Page 28 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 204 i 6.E.g 3. Project Description Highland AvenuelE Street TD Boundary o N r O 2 Mirad 13 �� C 28Th _-�-'7 gW®® IIL11I r m m - E nd-. 7 I// V �I N a [t� "G 2 _ 27th -- C Courd 'I;,;_ w C th C6tnitand _26th _ d -- E I -26th 1 25th s ' ® N �� > 24th N TMTfi Eim ow -Highland __ a 21St ` 2151 L�J > > L > m © 20th_.- --' ° :20th 7;77 21st /�-I}}I7TT1 Campus f �� W �IW.LLLL 79th-�. I 20th c7 Ca I 79th 9th 0 F'17 i_i L ll1 U)e _ 18th 'a ILIL�ILILTILIrLILIII�I ILIrCIj�,i H. RILL 18 rr�� rH�rHI t7t �- 17th `m U iLM L1LJ-lJ_LLJ1lJ t E 16th-. -�L 'moo F ME ® N c - - agnolia - LL Rai �� ® ® — 10 Q C d E s U ` N Q Site Boundary o 1,000 Scale Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center I DC&E • Figure 8 Packet.Pg.205 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. N 0 z Y c d E v C d E Q 0 L O U Y c m E CL O Ln v m 0 v N C O .N d W iL n. 0 m d w r m U 0 E v c m a Q LL Y C CD E L 0 M Y Y Q Y c CD E L 0 W Q Page 30 The Planning Center .january 2012 Packet Pg. 206 111 , ,• 111 = it 1-1111�[�■ 111111111 IIIIIIIIIII in ■n lu i mti = un i m = ngr11111■ ■111 I■ ■1 n1 in __ _ ■= n■1.. u u m■nll■ IIIIIIli1- a nm - � 11 ' ti anon_ ■mnlE� _'= '-11 '� _-n = _i< 1111111 11■Il: ■_ ' �� �_ pp �� _ =1■III, =11n11- I I �IIIIIIB = - a111111= 11111 1■ 111111111= __ HE _�- 'i 1 _ _non- a�11n1111 ■1111111= _III ` : =__ __ 111 � ; �_ illlllllii = IIIR- U1111 M@ MINIM IIIII_ _ !_ nnnm= I nRti 1lnnnnll er+un= annu= � -- �1 1 1111 IL ini a 1:ii■� l == nim _ 2 5 MINIM °—��r = _� ;: :_ • lamp= =nrt = _1nnn1_ in= 'I _ -_ ! �_ _ _!11111 _ . 1= ■IIIIIIII =_ __ L 1■1■ -- _ == =_ _� = ■1111 !_ == I� milli ■1111. s.,w ■ ■iwU 111■ w .. ■1 1111 Illlln N■ ■� --m r �r I 111111 Mlm in 11 IIn III 1 —wL ! s - _ � =11111111 a 11111111: _ -I' If Ila =111111'= up, :-. .d Iii 11111111111 111111 III NINON 1111111 1= =111111== =111111= ' _ !!gllllli _'II- IIIIII ■111111111111 11 1. :.111111 :.11 , - __ � � a =� 1. � _ X111111- 111111111111 " 11 111= -+11111 � =1111 �_ := 1111■ a� _� =1�= - _ -11111111-IIIIIIIIIIII 111 11 111- ■■I �IIIIIIIII i 7 I■w � 11111 _111111= �1 ' II o ■11111111 11111111111111 1 1 III_ IIIII! _ _1111111_ "■I■� >tllll�� 11 111_ _�I� _!IIII_ 11111■111111 �- 11111 1111 i■1111111 al1IgR �Illlp: 1 I illy _�� !IIIIh 11111■1111 !111111! IINIIIh *11111= _ IP- =1II�III! =111!111 !_II 111 = !1°n1I in nll� ■n1n� aJI6m II I: =I'I i�■� �I -�I Inuil■i -11111 !"� 111°_ � Ili ��I■� -__'= IIII 'M , = - Illli� 11111111 nllllllll� i11111h ■1■11= - 1111: ' II'■ ,n11111�: off III III 11111111glillill 111111111 pl ! Jill ' L J 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. N T O Z C d E c d E Q m 0 U C d E O. O d d D N N C O .T d LY W 7 IL C7 m m w r d U 0 E c v v Q LL Y G d E r v m x Q c a E r U 16 a Page 32 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg.208 1111= 111111 _1111111_ "N1N ■1111= 1111_ __ III■ _!Illll - __ _'� -_- IB 111111 ; 111111= = - - - ■3;= a11� - - II" 11111 HIM r= mn n® :.n■m anln■ N 1 III =�1 ■II I 111:' I� II NI'I !_ °_ III! =1 1111111! 11111111■ ■1! U P_ .I II! °_111!1 IIIII ill 11 II 111 = !IIIIIIII=_ 1111. ir111111L■ t1161i Ir -1111= 01�1 11111 :_N_'1111 111111 111;� -111111= O11 1�! � Ili !IIIIIIN- _ -_ = 11 1111` II■ rill .111111 111:'lllll III IIIP! 111111 -1 ,1_ Illii =11 .� `vim _�III16 =11111II _== __ _� 111111 � _ —� ■ � _ _ ' 1 nllll IINII IIII 111_ ■I N= :I� 11111 �IIG Ilfl JII 1111111111111111111 �111r rllllllr � I�� _"'1 11` �■I �'•�'.,�" 11 1111111111111 111=_ 111■�_ � _ • 1 ! � ■;�-��11 IN 11: 1111111111111 1. =1i>i� �� ' = J�N� - IIIIII■111 1 r■IN■ III■■■ i` r Ilf v�1�7 °IIII iu■ nlllll� ,■ ■11111■ t p � 1� `I�i w1�� � 1■1 1! Lr, ■ 1 ■loll■ ■ n�■ ■� 'III � �� i��■��� � ill• VIII _ N,. • ��+1 �I ; i i r ■r■� rlr�r 1 III III HIM �. ►11�� :� ■ .� II> Y 6.E.g 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N r O 2 C d E v c d E Q m 0 O U Y c d E O. O d d N c O N d W 7 IL m U) a d 4= t= d U O Y E v c w v n a U. Y S5 d E L U R Q C d E L V Y a Page 34 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 210 © 3. Project Description Rialto AvenuelE Street TD Boundary o N r O 2 0 5 t c LJ1W 4t 4th V d c ' court � O CL > TTM W I ❑ DIM Ln nd LL O N � aa Kier t1111LLLWlll c KLJ 8 9 O y N ® Rialto K 7 77 K W C-10rf9 2 r I c lia Y res m Athol � - o it 'a E —Cluster m o w I m C ID 3 I 0 Valley -o O yet . Y bm � LL C d L V W r+ Q C d E L V W M_ Q — — — Site Boundary o 1,000 Scale Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center DC&E • Figure 11 "' 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. N 6 z c v E v c d E a d 0 0 U c d E CL 0 m m LO0 �o v N C O y d pr W 7 IL m N d w d U O E 7 c m a v Q LL C d E r v R c d E r v m Q Page 36 •The Planning Center January 2012 ticket Pg.212 6:E.g O3. Project Description North Mall WaylE Street TD Boundary o N r O Z E Q w 0 0 ® U CL ® C d O > d D II •• N %TF1 r C O ` h)Wall .y O � > W a m rn v d C ` U ` Q 0 e Sno E v c d a Q LL \ Q Q C d E r U A Y Q Site Boundary o 1,000 M Scale(Feet) Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center I DC&E • Figure 12 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N 1 O 2 c d E c N E Q d 0 O U Y c d E 0. 0 Q� 7 d LO N r N c O N d W 7 CL to m v v w r m U 0 E 0 c w v Q LL C N E r v m >r Q c m L V w Q Page 38 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg.214 6.E.g Q3. Project Description Hunts LanelWest Hospitality Lane TD Boundary o N r O Z Y \ C d E c d N v E U c E E G O d d O m N m @� m O m _ E YpndwNlt N CL m d ■ U CT Redlands .O-� o r c C d V Q D LL C d Q C d E L U W Q — — — Site Boundary 0 1,000 ru Scale Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center DC&E • Figure 13 Packet Pg. 215 6.E.g 2. Environmental Setting T This page intentionally left blank. ° N T O 2 r c d E c d E Q d -o O U c d E a 0 Lnv d 0 �o v T N C O .T d W M a c� m y a CD w 0 d U O E 0 v C d 9 a LL C d E L 0 R a C d E L 0 M Q Page 40 •The Planning Center January 2012 �P„a 6.E.g 3. Project Description Carnegie Drive/Hospitality Lane TD Boundary o N r O 2 "- K_ y E v c m E Q d 0 O U d E CL 0 m 0 N o 00 N Ell nn o D CX� � a � m U) sewood w w wv U M Midi W1111111 M7/ if Q a LL C N E L U A Q C d E L U Q — — — Site Boundary o 1,000 Scar Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center DC&E • Figure 14 Packet Pg. 217 6.E.g 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. N 0 z c d E C d E Q d 0 O U c d E CL 0 d m LO 0 v N 0 O N .j d lr W M IL 0 m y v d w r d U O E 3 G d Q W w G d E s v m Q V d E L V R Q Page 42 The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g © 3. Project Description Tippecanoe AvenuelHospitality Lane N TD Boundary 6 LW race d c d an. ernar mo _ E Q II m t IIII� 0 Olev- 7 E . 0 41 m m v Laurel 6 d Le r by H rdt _ i I Hardt_ (V —� Gould ' 0 EEL Jr Ewwr�� O Gould— w Lam_ 7 > Devi n T1I IIII-- � E � I:Dawdson: 0 N u n w m III III III III III III III It _ t a E U � gy m � mi m C v �m Leu. w m H7rrdman ~ 80 `o U m o M -o a ,3 Bedland Q 1i�1 r U a r 0 E r v m ® a Site Boundary o 1,000 Scale Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan EIR The Planning Center DC&E • Figure 15 Packet Pg.219 6'Eg 2. Environmental Setting This page intentionally left blank. ° N r O Z c v E C d E Q 0 O U c d E 0 0 w d 0 v N 0 O N d W 7 a m v T w r m U 0 E a c m v Q LL r W E r v R c 0 E r U M Page 44 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 220 6.E.g 0 N 6 Z 3. Project Description d 3.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND E m Over the past decade,the City of San Bernardino (City) and its partners, which include Omnitrans and the a San Bernardino Association of Governments(SANBAG),have made consistent progress in establishing the 0 foundation for expanded transit and transit-oriented development(TOD)opportunities.The City's approach has been comprehensive and well integrated with the local land use context and transit systems, with E numerous studies and plans on expanding local and regional bus,bus rapid transit,light rail,and Metrolink o facilities completed or underway. One of these plans includes the sbX E Street Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project (sbX BRT Project), which is being sponsored and implemented by Omnitrans and SANBAG, in o coordination with the City. The environmental impacts of the sbX Project were fully analyzed in an Environmental Assessment/initial Study(SCH#2008091107)prepared in June of 2009 by Parsons on behalf v of Omnitrans, which is included by reference in this Addendum. In coordination with the City,Omnitrans is in the process of developing detailed construction schedules for F the station and roadway improvements necessary to implement the sbX BRT Project, which consists of a g 15.7-mile corridor that spans between northern San Bernardino and Loma Linda.The proposed transit route ^ T would begin in the vicinity of Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive in northern San Bernardino and terminate in the l .� vicinity of the Veterans Administration Hospital located at Barton Road and Benton Street in Loma Linda.The sbX BRT Project will include 16 art-inspired transit stations at key university, government, business, w entertainment and medical centers as well as four park-and-ride facilities Improved rapid transit along the a project corridor will help Omnitrans achieve its long-range goals to cost effectively enhance lifeline mobility 0 and accessibility;improve transit operations;support economic growth and redevelopment;conserve non- 00 renewable resources; and improve corridor safety. d w The sbX BRT Project will be completed in 2,000-foot segments, with construction anticipated to take two years and service anticipated to commence in early 2014 (Omnitrans 2011). Once completed, it will be the r) first express bus service project to be constructed in the Inland Empire. ° E The potential for TOD at sbX station areas draws on TOD principles that focus on compact growth,a mix of land uses, and pedestrian-oriented design within walking distance of a transit station.The potential for the v area proximate to the forthcoming sbX stations to reach higher concentrations of development than their C surroundings is dependent primarily on the planned land use and zoning designations around the stations. The improved transit services proposed under the sbX BRT Project would provide the City opportunities for U TOD and transit-supportive uses in the station areas. m E 3.2 PROJECT PURPOSE m While the planning,design and construction of the transit facilities are largely the responsibility of Omnitrans a and SANBAG, the City is responsible for establishing complementary land use and regulatory plans, standards and guidelines for the station areas and surrounding neighborhoods and businesses.The TD and E its regulations are established in order to implement the City's General Plan policies promoting transit- u oriented development within the City.The intent of the TD is to allow and encourage an appropriate mix and =° intensity of land uses in a compact pattern around transit stations that will foster transit usage, create new 4 opportunities for economic growth, encourage infill and redevelopment, reduce dependency on the Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 45 Packet Pg.221 6.E.g 3. Project Description automobile, improve air quality,and promote high quality, interactive neighborhoods.The regulations and ° N guidelines are based upon the following principles: 0 A. An attractive transit station with surrounding pedestrian amenities as the focus of the transit- Z oriented development area. 'o B. An appropriate mix and intensity of uses such as office, retail, entertainment, residential, and recreational facilities that support transit use and are designed for convenient access by transit G riders, pedestrians, and bicyclists. m 0 0 C. Inviting and pedestrian-focused open spaces on both public and private properties, such as smaller public pocket parks, civic plazas, outdoor dining areas, common greens, and other r types of urban spaces. E 0. 0 D. A walkable and bikeable area with pleasant connections linking transit stations with businesses and neighborhoods. o E. An interconnected street and non-vehicular network where walkways, bikeways, landscaping, v and other streetscape amenities receive priority. N 3.3 TRANSIT OVERLAY DISTRICT AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS C 0 N Approval of the proposed project would supplement the San Bernardino Development Code to include the TD overlay.A copy of the proposed revisions to the City's Development Code are included as Appendix A, W San Bernardino Development Code, Transit Overlay District Zoning Standards and Guidelines. The modifications would formally add this district in the list of districts included in Article 1 -General Provisions, w and would detail the new overlay district under Article II,Land Use Zoning Districts, Section 19.19A,Transit D EL Overlay District(TD).The boundaries proposed for the TD districts are shown in Figures 3-15.The TD would m establish standards and regulations beyond those required by the underlying base zones. If the y requirements of the TD conflict with the underlying base zone, the TD requirements would govern. The proposed TD includes the following subsections: .2 d • Purpose • Applicability 0 • Transit Station Area types E E • General Provisions ° • Building Form and Placement Standards a • Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses a • Residential Transition Standards LL • Parking • Subdivision Standards E • Design guidelines r • District Image • Transit Oriented Design Q • Site Planning and Architectural Design • Site Design E • Landscape Design 0 o a Page 46 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 222 6.E.g 3. Project Description The TD zoning regulations include standards and guidelines for but not limited to building massing and ° design,setbacks,site coverage,and landscaping and would apply to establishment of all new structures and uses within the boundaries of the 13 transit station areas.The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning o designations for the affected parcels would be maintained. The TD District would be an 'overlay' zoning Z which would further define development standards specifically for the transit station areas. E 3.3.1 Permitted and Prohibited Land Uses m E TD Section 19.19A.O6O,Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses,describes changes that would apply to allowable uses within the TD areas.All existing legally established structures and uses currently within the TD c areas that do not conform with the standards of the TD would be deemed legal nonconforming uses and/or structures.The repair,renovations,and minor expansion to such uses and structures would be allowed as permitted by Development Code Chapter 19.62,Nonconforming Structures and Uses. E o. 0 The intent of the use regulations would be to permit and encourage land uses that create a pedestrian- friendly environment that supports transit use. o Permitted Uses v The TD provisions for permitted and conditionally permitted land uses would apply to commercial base N zones. Under the provisions,the allowed uses would be the same with the exceptions as noted in Table 3. The table summarizes uses that would be permitted with the approval of a Development Permit but were °-N . previously not permitted uses in the zones listed. �, '> ( rti (D xW Table 3 W New Permitted and Conditional Permitted Uses a Applicable Zones 0 Land Use uses previously not permitted in these zones) co Convenience Stores(pursuant to Section 19.06.025) CO,CR-1,2,3,CH,and CCS-1 d No longer conditional for CG-1,2,3 — Dry Cleaners CCS-1 ` CO,CG-3,CR-2,3,CH,and CCS-1 Educational Services No longer conditional to CG-1,2 Medical/Care Facilities/Social Services CCS-1 E Mixed Use CO,CG-1,23,CR-13,CH,and CCS-1 c (including residential only where current allowed in base zone No longer conditional to CG-2,3,and CR-2 m Mobile Vendors Applicable to Main Street Overlay District)v 4 Neighborhood Grocery Stores CO,CR-1,3,and CCS-1 No longer conditional to CG-1,2,3,CR-2,and CH Parking Structures CG-1,23,CH,CCS-1,and CO m E r U Mixed-Use Development is defined in the Development Code as: M a The development of a parcel(s) or structure(s)with 2 or more different land uses such as, c but not limited to a combination of residential, office, manufacturing, retail, public, or E entertainment in a single or physically integrated group of structures. L U N Q t Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 47 6.E.g ( " 3. Project Description The TD overlay would only allow residential uses within commercial-base zones that already allow residential ° uses.Moreover,the maximum density permitted for the residential would be the same as the density allowed r for the underlying base zone.As with the existing Development Code,overall development within a mixed- o use parcel would be limited by the development standards that specify lot coverage, building height and Z floor area ratios(FAR).A comparison of the maximum permitted residential density(and related provisions), building setbacks and FAR by zone for the underlying base zones as provided in the City's General Plan and Development Code is provided in Table 4.Table 2 provides a matrix of the land use designations included within the respective transit station areas. E 0 0 0 Table 4 v Development Code and General Plan Residential Densities and m Standards For Commercial Districts* E a Current 0 Code CG-1 CG-2 CG-3 CO CR-1 CR-2 CR-3 CCS-1 CH > 47du/ac* o Residential * 12 47du/ac* — ** — — 0 Density 47du/ac 21du/ac* (GP says It 54 du/ac Front 10 10 15 15 0 0 15 20 10 FV Setbacks Building 30fI12st 30fl/2st 301V2st 30-52fV2- 52fV4st 100fVna 52ff/4st 301V2st 45fVna N Hei ht 4st FAR 0.7 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 3.0' 0.7z 1.0 0.7a 0 Notes:du/ac=dwelling units per acre;ft=feet;st=stories a Floor Area Ratios are provided in the 2005 General Plan Update,Table LU-2.Also see previous Table 1-1 in this Addendum w *Senior citizen and senior congregate care housing only uJ **Bonus density of up to 50%for senior citizen and senior congregate care housing only D ***Senior citizen and senior congregate care housing shall permit up to 130 du/ac(by CUP) a ' Non-Residential Intensity-3.0 FAR(4.0 FAR'rf vertical mixed use project)Residential Density-54 dwelling units per acre. m 0.7 FAR commercial,3.0 FAR Hotels&Offices,1.5 FAR R&D. rn ' 10,000 square feet minimum lot size. y w v Prohibited Uses 0 The TD overlay district would specifically prohibit the following land uses, which are currently allowed in E some of the underlying base zones: 0 v • Auto parts sales a • Auto repair LL • Car, RV, and truck sales c • Car Washes 0 • Service Stations s • Service Commercial uses pursuant to Table 06.01 J., excluding veterinary services • Impound vehicle storage yard • Vehicle leasing/rental c • RV parks E • Blood banks s U • Drive-thru commercial uses • Restaurants with drive-thru • Nurseries Page 48 a The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 224 3. Project Description 3.3.2 Development Standards and Guidelines ° N Chapter 10.19A.050, Proposed Building Form and Placement Standards, of the TD zoning regulations o provide customized standards for each station area type.These standards define minimum and maximum Z requirements for Build to Line setback,building height,and upperfloor step back.The Build to Line standard defines the minimum public frontage for the primary building on a parcel. The highest percentages are E defined for the highest, urban activity areas (e.g., Downtown Station Area stations are 80 percent). The v Residential Transition Standards(Chapter 19.19A.070)establish standards to ensure that new development E in the TD is compatible with adjacent single-family residential development. d 0 Table 5 provides an overview of development standards included in the current Development Code in L) comparison to the proposed TD overlay. d E a 0 Table 5 > Key Development Standards-- Comparison of Current Code and TD Overlay o Current Code TOD Overlay Front Setbacks minimum front setback of 0-20 feet No minimum front setback;Maximum front setback v� of 15-25 feet,depending on the station area type Building height 30-100 feet max,depending on the base 30-100 feet max,depending on the station area type zone o Upper floor step-back No requirement 8 feet minimum for all station area types except for N Kendall Neighborhood � > Minimum building presence None 50-80%depending on the station area type ` . Required ground floor fagade None 50-75%depending on the station area type transparency W Entrance orientation D requirement None Front door facing public frontage line a t7 Minimum first floor ceiling None 15 feet umi height for buildings Minimum Lot Size 10,000 for new commercial or industrial None a)subdivisions — Maximum Lot coverage 50-100%,depending on the base zone None m U Residential Transition New setbacks,step-back,commercial service 0 Standards None location and screening,noise generating activities E Section 19.19A.070 0 Reduced onsite parking requirements for specific Parking Zoning Ordinance Section 19.24 uses,and other new standards in Section 19.19.A.080 Q Subdivision Standards New standards for block length and street connectivity LL Design Guidelines New advisory design guidelines(Section 19.19A.100) E L U A A summary of new TD standards by category of transit stations is provided in Table 6, Build-to-Line and Q Building Height Standards. c m E L U Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 49 : 225 3. Project Description Table 6 ° N Build-to Line Setback and Building Height Standards TD Station Areas Build-to Line Setback Building Height' 6 Minimum None[3] None c Kendall Neighborhood Station Areas Maximum 25 ft. [4] 30 feel/2 stories E E Street Neighborhood Station Areas Minimum None[3] None E Maximum 15 ft[4] 42 feet/3 stories a Minimum None None v Village/Urban Station Areas o Maximum 15 ft[4] 56 feeV4 stories V Downtown Station Areas Minimum None[3] None m Maximum 15 ft[4] 100 feeV7 stories[5] a 0 Employment Center Station Areas Minimum None[3] None i 6.E.g 0 N r Z Z 4. Environmental Checklist E 4.1 BACKGROUND E v 1. Project Title:Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans o Environmental Impact Report c m 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: o City of San Bernardino 0 201 North E Street, Suite 301 > San Bernardino, CA 92401 0 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Jeff Smith, Senior Urban Planner (909) 663-1044 c7 c 0 4. Project Location: Includes 13 transit station areas generally located north of Interstate 10 (1-10) and Lh east of 1-215 within a 12.8-mile corridor that spans between the northern end of the City to the C1 southern end, along Kendall Drive, E Street and Hospitality Lane. a- W 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: v'` :0 Jeff Smith, Senior Urban Planner a Economic Development Agency m City of San Bernardino cn 201 North E Street, Suite 301 d San Bernardino, CA 92401 r (909) 663-1044 j 0 6. General Plan Designation:Varies by station area (see r 2, Environmental Setting) E v 7. Zoning:Varies by station area (see Chapter 2,Environmental Setting) v 8. Description of Project: C The project consists of a Transit Overlay District(TD)zoning designation and associated development standards and design guidelines for areas surrounding the city's transit stations. The TD and its d regulations are proposed in order to implement the City's General Plan policies promoting transit- E r oriented development within San Bernardino and would apply to 13 individual transit stations along the m San Bernardino bus rapid transit(sbX BRT)corridor.The corridor spans approximately 15 miles between a Loma Linda to the south and northern San Bernardino (Palm Street/Kendall Drive)to the north. c m 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:Varies by station area(see Chapter 2,Environmental Setting) E U IV 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required (e.g., permits,financing approval, or a participation agreement): Not applicable Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 51 Packet.,P 227 6,E,9 4. Environmental Checklist 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 0 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. z ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agricultural and Forest Resources ❑ Air Quality m ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils E ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards 6 Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise E ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation a ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance s 0 U 4.3 DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY) E CL On the basis of this initial evaluation: -0 w I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a ° NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Lo I 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will F not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by c the project proponent.A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. T m 0:F-1 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an a: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. w D a. F-1 1 find thatthe proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impact"or"potentially significant to unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an v earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. v 0 ® 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effecton the environment,because E all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that v earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon C the proposed project, nothing further is required. LL / E E r Signature V Date c E Printed Name For .° a Page 52 •The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g 4. Environmental Checklist 4.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ° N r 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately z supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question.A"No Impact'answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show E that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved(e.g.,the project falls outside c a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project- m specific factors,as well as general standards(e.g.,the project would not expose sensitive receptors a to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). d v 0 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. E CL 0 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur,then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with o mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant.If there are one or more"Potentially Significant t Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the C incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a 00 y "Less Than Significant Impact."The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 0: m 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR,or other CEQA process, w an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section a. 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: m m a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. v w b) Impacts Adequately Addressed.Identitywhich effects from the above checklistwere within the v scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the ° earlier analysis. E v c c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures m v Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the 0 earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. a LL 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources r for potential impacts(e.g.,general plans,zoning ordinances).Reference to a previously prepared or E outside document should,where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the m statement is substantiated.A source list should be attached,and other sources used or individuals Q contacted should be cited in the discussion. c m 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or E individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. v m Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 53 Packet Pg. 229 6.E.g .. 4. Environmental Checklist S) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead ° agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's N T environmental effects in whatever format is selected. O z c 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: d E M a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and d E b) the mitigation measure identified, if any,to reduce the impact to less than significant. 0 U d E CL 0 d m Ln 0 a N 0 O A d W a. a c� m U) d w v U 0 E 0 c m a Q LL C W E L U M a E L V W Q Page 54 The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g 0 N O Z S. Environmental Analysis E E d This section is intended to provide evidence to substantiate the conclusions set forth in the Environmental E Checklist.The section will briefly summarize the conclusions of the SBGPU EIR and then discuss whether or d not the proposed project is consistent with the findings contained in the SBGPU EIR. Mitigation measures o referenced are from the SBGPU EIR. U c d 5.1 AESTHETICS E CL 0 5.1.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR d 0 As concluded in the SBGPU EIR,the most notable aesthetic effect resulting from buildout of the General Plan Update would be the change in the visual characters of the areas from predominantly open viewsheds to N ones that would be occupied with urban land uses.These areas occur mostly in the northern portion of the City and outside the are.Additional effects include new sources of light and glare resulting from development projects. However, future development plans are subject to a review process overseen by the City that ensures preservation of aesthetic quality. Further,the City's Municipal Code regulates light and glare from .2 N new developments.For these reasons aesthetic impacts associated with the 2005 General Plan Update were ^^.� > determined to be less than significant in the SBGPU EIR and no mitigation measures were required. 031 5.1.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project w a t7 Substantial New New c� Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to w Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical rj New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or o Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact E I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on X a scenic vista? v b) Substantially damage scenic C resources,including,but not limited LL to,trees,rock outcroppings,and X historic buildings within a state u scenic highway? E L c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site X 4 and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely X E affect day or nighttime views in the L u area? M a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 55 Packet Pg. 231 6 e'§'r S. Environmental Analysis Comments: 0 N a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Z c No Impact.Some of the project's northern station areas(Stations 1 through 4,as shown in Figure 2,Local d Vicinity) are afforded views of the San Bernardino Mountains, which form the City's northern boundary. a However,future development of these station areas as anticipated under the proposed project would occur E similar to and as permitted under the City's General Plan,which was fully analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. No E intensification of land uses in these station areas would occur under the proposed project beyond those already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.Additionally, none of 0 the building heights in those station areas would exceed 30 feet in height(or two stories),as outlined in the TD overlay zoning regulations(see Appendix A)and noted above in Section 3.3.2,Development Standards m and Guidelines. Furthermore, the height of San Bernardino Mountains also ensures that they will remain a E a scenic backdrop to San Bernardino without detriment from anticipated future development associated with o the proposed project.Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not have an adverse effect d on scenic vistas of the San Bernardino Mountains and no significant impact would occur. o �o b) Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? N No Impact. According to the California Scenic Highway Mapping System of the California Department of c Transportation,the station areas associated with the proposed project are not on or near a state-designated y scenic highway(Caltrans 2007).The nearest designated state scenic highway to the project area is a portion of State Route 38, the Angeles Crest Highway, approximately 18 miles west of the nearest station area (Station 13). Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not have a significant impact on 0: scenic resources along a state scenic highway. in M IL c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? m Minor Technical Changes or Additions. Although the character of some of the station areas may be m designed and developed in a more transit-oriented manner(to include a mix of uses)than anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update,implementation of the proposed project would not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project area or their surroundings. With the exception of the allowance of o increased building heights (an increase of up to 4 stories in the Employment Center Station Areas and 5 stories in the Downtown Station Areas)and mixed use(e.g.,residential over office or commercial,office over £E commercial) in some station areas,future development of the station areas anticipated under the proposed project would generally occur as permitted under the City's General Plan.Although mixed-use would be a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the proposed project,the uses themselves would a be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.The proposed project would u still allow the same permitted uses under the General Plan to be developed, but in a manner that would permit them to be more closely integrated with each other in a horizontal or vertical manner and thereby E allow a higher level of connectivity and community form. For example, a mixed-use project could allow R residential units to be built over commercial or office uses.The residential densities(dwelling units per acre) Q and non residential intensities(floor area ratio)would not change as they would be implemented consistent with those currently permitted under the City's existing zoning standards. v E .a The TD zoning overlay includes a set of development standards and design guidelines that are flexible enough to allow property owners and developers to express their vision while maintaining a consistency in urban form to encourage an attractive multi-modal atmosphere.The TD zoning regulations include standards Page 56 •The Planning Center January 2012 PacketPg. 232 S. Environmental Analysis and guidelines for but not limited to building massing, form, placement and design; building heights, ° setbacks;site coverage;and landscaping.Following are some of standards and guidelines include outlined N r TD zoning regulations: 6 • Provide simple changes in wall plane to reduce the apparent mass and scale of the dwelling, consistent with the architectural style of the home. m • Create building relief through the use of tower elements and building projections designed to E enhance facade variety and visual interest. 0 • Differentiate individual building masses along the street wall with slight indentations to enhance r blockscape variety and visual interest. a` E Q. • Design landscape buffers adjacent to rear building elevations to soften building architecture while 0 providing a landscaped transition between the rear parking area and building. 0 • Use medians and islands to segment large parking fields creating variety and visual interest while mimicking traditional orchard grids. �r The TD zoning regulations would apply to the establishment of all new structures and uses within the N boundaries of the 13 sbX station areas shown in Figures 3 through 15; therefore, ensuring that all future o development implement standards and guidelines that would ensure high-quality design and compatibility with surrounding uses. Therefore,implementation of the proposed project would beneficially alter the visual character of the station areas and would create vibrant, pedestrian-friendly station areas. W D EL d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare,which would adversely affect day or nighttime m m views in the area? V) m Minor Technical Changes or Additions.Future development of the station areas as anticipated under the r proposed project would be similar to that permitted under the City's General Plan.An increase in allowable ti building heights could result in an incremental increase in light sources due to additional allowable building 0 stories. However, the height increase would occur in the most developed/urbanized station areas (Employment Center and Downtown Station Areas. Additionally, no new sources of light and glare would 3 occur within the project areas beyond those already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.As with development associated with the 2005 General Plan Update, light and v glare sources associated with future development under the proposed project would also be required to a adhere to the lighting requirements stipulated in the City's Municipal Code.No changes to lighting standards would occur with adoption of the proposed TD zoning overlay. Furthermore, the light sources associated W with the future development under the proposed project would be similar to those of surrounding land uses. Because the project site and surrounding area are largely developed, the lighting associated with E improvements and structures of the proposed project would not substantially increase nighttime light and Y glare in the project area. Finally, future development in accordance with the propose project would be a required to comply with California's Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations, which outlines mandatory provisions for lighting control devices and luminaires.Therefore,implementation of the proposed project would not have a E significant light and glare impact. Stm/ Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 57 ket Pg. 233 5. Environmental Analysis 5.1.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed N Project 0 Z No mitigation measures related to aesthetics were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. d E 5.2 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES v 5.2.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR a d The SBGPU EIR concluded that implementation of the 2005 General Plan Update would not result in the loss 0 of land in agricultural production, and no farmland, agriculturally-zoned, or Williamson Act land would be affected by future development in accordance with the 2005 General Plan Update,which included the sbX station areas comprising the proposed project. No mitigation measures were required. E 0 Impacts to forest resources were not analyzed in the SBGPU EIR as the requirement to analyze forest resources in environmental documents did not become effective until the adoption of the Senate Bill 97(SB p 97) amendments (adopted December 31, 2009, effective March 18, 2010)to the CECA Guidelines, which occurred after the adoption date (November 5, 2005) of the 2005 General Plan Update and its associated Ln SBGPU EIR by the San Bernardino City Council. Prior to the adoption of SB 97,forest resources had not yet been generally recognized as an environmental issue.Therefore,the analysis to impacts on forest resources N is new in this Addendum. a 0 N 5.2.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project rr tr Substantial New New w Change in Information Mitigation or a Project or Showing Alternative to m Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor rn Resulting in Significant Significant Technical a New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or ;R Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact m II.AG R1 C U LTU RE AND FOREST RESOURCES.In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant U environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model 0 If 997)prepared by the California Dept.of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and E farmland.In determining whether impacts to forest resources,including timberland,are significant environmental effects,lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's m inventory of forest land,including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project;and v forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.Would the Q project: LL a) Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown E E on the maps prepared pursuant to U the Farmland Mapping and X Q Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non- c agricultural use? m b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a Williamson Act X �o contract? Page 58 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 234-1 S. Environmental Analysis Substantial New New ° N Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to Z Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact c) Conflict with existing zoning for,or E cause rezoning of,forest land(as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),timberland(as v 0 defined by Public Resources Code X section 4526),or timberland zoned r Timberland Production(as defined E by Government Code section o CL 51104(g))? m d) Result in the loss of forest land or o conversion of forest land to non- X forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,due to their location or nature,could result in X N conversion of Farmland,to non- o agricultural use or conversion of .N forest land to non-forest use? > Comments: �� w D a e) Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as m shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the ca California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? w No Impact.The station areas associated with the proposed project are located within highly urbanized areas v of the City of San Bernardino and consist of a variety of urban uses, including residential, commercial, institutional,and office. Future development anticipated under the proposed project would occur within the ° same development envelope of the parcels included in the General Plan land use map and analyzed in the E SBGPU EIR.Additionally,according to California Resource Agency's Department of Conservation"Important Farmland Maps for San Bernardino County" (2008), the project area and entire City are not designated Farmland of Statewide Importance,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Local Importance(DLRP 2008).As with "o the 2005 General Plan Update,implementation of the proposed project would not convert mapped farmland a to nonagricultural use. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not have an impact on r` farmlands. m E r Q Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The project's station areas consist of a mix of the following General Plan and zoning a designations, which are one and the same: Commercial General (CG-1), Commercial General-2 (CG-2), d Commercial General-3 (CG-3), Commercial Office (CO), Commercial Regional-1 (CR-1), Commercial E Regional-2 (CR-2), Commercial Regional-3 (CR-3), Central City South (CCS-1), Industrial Heavy (IH), Public/Commercial Recreation (PCR), Public Facilities (PF), Public Flood Control (PFC), Residential High a (RH),Residential Medium High(RMH),Residential Medium(RM),Residential Suburban(RS),and Residential Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 59 Packet Pg. 235 5. Environmental Analysis Urban (RU). As concluded in the SBGPU EIR, the project's station areas are not designated or zoned for N agricultural use, used for agriculture, or subject to a Williamson Act contract.Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not have an impact on agricultural resources. Z c g) Conflict with existing zoning for,or cause rezoning of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources w Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or 0 timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? E No Impact.As noted above,the station areas consist of a mix of General Plan and zoning designations.The a project areas are not designated or zoned for forest or timber land or used for foresting. Additionally, the v project areas are located within highly urbanized areas of the City of San Bernardino and consist of a variety of urban uses.There is no forest land or resources within the confines of or in proximity to the project areas. d Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not have an impact on forest land or resources, E CL and no mitigation measures are required. c Z 4) h) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? p co No Impact. See response to Section 5.2.2(c), above. ,-q i) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could N result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest o use? y .5 d No Impact. See response to Sections 5.2.2(a) and (b), above. 5.2.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed w Project a No mitigation measures related to agricultural resources were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. u00i a v 5.3 AIR QUALITY C a 5.3.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR c As concluded in the SBGPU EIR, growth and buildout projections for the General Plan Update were E determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan. Additionally, implementation of the General Plan land use plan is not anticipated to result in CO concentrations exceeding federal and state standards.Therefore,these impacts were considered to be less than significant. However,the SBGPU EIR a also determined that even after incorporating mitigation measures, the magnitude of the General Plan LL Update buildout development and corresponding generation of air pollutant emissions would result in exceedance of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's(SCAQMD)construction and operational phase thresholds. These emissions were thus considered significant on a cumulative basis by SCAOMD. E Therefore,the SBGPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would have significant and Y unavoidable adverse air quality impacts due to the magnitude of emissions generated during construction a and operation. m E L U m Q Page 60 •The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g S. Environmental Analysis 5.3.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project ° N 6 2 Substantial Now Ne w Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to E Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical E New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Q Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact 0 III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air V pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air X o quality Ian? d b) Violate any air quality standard or v contribute substantially to an X o existing or projected air quality violation? �* c) Resuft in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any N criteria pollutant for which the c project region is non-attainment 2 under an applicable federal or state X ^ Mn ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative �1 thresholds for ozone precursors ? w d) Expose sensitive receptors to a substantial pollutant X m concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting X a substantial number of people? w d V The primary air pollutants of concern for which ambient air quality standards(AAQS)have been established ° are ozone(03),carbon monoxide(CO),coarse inhalable particulate matter(PM,,),fine inhalable particulate E matter(PM,,,),sulfur dioxide(SOS, nitrogen dioxide (NO,),and lead (Pb). Geographic areas are classified c under the national and California Clean Air Acts as either in attainment or nonattainment for each criteria pollutant based on whether the AAQS have been achieved. The South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB),which is Q managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD), is designated as nonattainment for 03, PM,s, PM,,' and lead (Los Angeles County only) under the California and National AAQS and U. nonattainment for NO,under the California AAQS. E s U Q C d E s U @ CARB approved the SCAQMD's request to redesignate the SoCAB from serious nonattainment for PM,,to Q attainment for PM,,under the national AAQS on March 25,2010 because the SoCAB has not violated federal 24- hour PM,,standards during the period from 2004 to 2007. However,the USEPA has not yet approved this request. Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 61 Packet Pg. 237 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis Comments: 0 N a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Z c No Impact.CEQA requires that General Plans be evaluated for consistency with the AQMP.AQMP strategy d is based on projections from local General Plans,projects that are consistent with the local General Plan are c considered consistent with the air quality-related Regional Plan.New land use introduced into certain station areas under the proposed project would be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan and E E zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.As discussed in Section 5.16,Transportation and Traffic,the proposed project would establish 0 more compact land use patterns to facilitate shorter travel distances and alternative travel modes. The project would also reduce commute distances by providing housing close to transit.The proposed project would not exceed the assumptions and impacts identified in the SBGPU EIR,and would be consistent with E CL the AQMP.There would be no impact, and no mitigation measures would be required. o v b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality o violation? v No Impact.Criteria air pollutant emissions would be generated from transportation and stationary sources within the TD. Although the character of the station areas would change and mixed uses would be introduced under the proposed project,the uses themselves would not be new as they are already permitted o under the existing General Plan and zoning designations.The TD overlay and associated zoning regulations, .2 development standards,and design guidelines would encourage a mix and intensity of land use around sbX transit stations and would foster transit-usage and encourage walking/biking and would implement the land use and transportation strategies of the General Plan.The project would establish more compact land use X patterns to facilitate shorter travel distances and alternative travel modes. The project would also reduce w commute distances by providing housing close to transit. Consequently, the proposed project has the a potential to reduce transportation-related air pollutant emissions within the City. Furthermore, as with CO development anticipated under the General Plan Update, most project-related development projects (n (including mixed use)would require a project-level environmental analysis at the time development plans are v submitted to the City.As a part of the environmental review, a project-specific air quality analysis for most projects would also be required.Future development projects anticipated under the proposed project would be required to adhere to the mitigation measures outlined in the SBGPU EIR.The project would not result in o additional impacts anticipated in the SBGPU EIR; therefore, significant impacts with the proposed project � would not occur. v c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard a (Including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? U No Impact. SCAQMD considers exceedance of their daily significance thresholds to lead to a significant v contribution to emissions on a cumulative basis.As discussed previously,the proposed project would not E result in additional emissions than what was anticipated in the SBGPU EIR.There would be no additional @ impacts to the ones analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. a d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? m E s Minor Technical Changes or Additions.An impact is potentially significant if concentration of emissions at R sensitive receptors exceed the state or federal AAQS.The TD overlay would only allow residential uses within a commercial-base zones that already allow residential uses.Moreover,the maximum density permitted for the Page 62 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 238 S. Environmental Analysis residential would be the same as the density allowed for the underlying base zone. Further, as discussed ° above Section 5.3.2(a),the proposed project would not worsen traffic,thereby worsening or creating new of N CO "hot spots" at heavily congested intersections. 6 Z Dry cleaners would be permitted with the approval of a Development Permit but were previously not permitted in areas zoned CCS-1 in Station Area 9. Dry cleaners that would be allowed under the proposed TD could generate toxic air contaminants in proximity to residential area. As identified in the SBGPU EIR, these emissions are controlled at the local and regional level through permitting (SCAQMD New Source E Review Permit)and would be required to implement best available control technology to ensure that risks are v below SCAQMD's significance criteria prior to the issuance of any necessary air quality permits. Potential o impacts related to the permitted dry cleaner use would be less than significant,and no mitigation measures v would be required. m E e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? o m No Impact.As with the 2005 General Plan Update, future development in accordance with the proposed o project would not emit objectionable odors that would affect a substantial number of people. Future development within the station areas in accordance with the proposed project—which would include but not 11 be limited to residential,commercial, retail, office, hotel, mixed-use—is not associated with foul odors that constitute a public nuisance. During construction activities of future development projects, construction N equipment exhaust, application of asphalt and architectural coatings would temporarily generate odors. These impacts were addressed in the SBGPU EIR and no additional impacts would occur with the proposed .2 MA project.Therefore,impacts of the proposed project associated with operation-and construction-generated '> odors would not be significant. n: a 5.3.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed w Project (L The following mitigation measures are included in the SBGPU EIR and would apply to development within the project's station areas. w GP 5.2-2A Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the property owner/developer shall include a note on all m grading plans which requires the construction contractor to implement following measures L) during grading.These measures shall also be discussed at the pregrade conference. ° E • Use low emission mobile construction equipment. d v • Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned. LL Q • Utilize existing power sources (i.e., power poles) when feasible. c m • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. E U R • Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes.When feasible,construction should be planned a so that lane closures on existing streets are kept to a minimum. c d • Schedule construction operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours to minimize traffic E congestion. Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 63 Packet Pg. 239 5. Environmental Analysis T Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities (the N • plan may include advance public notice of routing,use of public transportation and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service). 6 c GP 5.2-2B The City shall promote the use of low or zero VOC content architectural coatings for E construction and maintenance activities. m 5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES E Q m 5.4.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR 0 The City of San Bernardino's General Plan update would facilitate urban land uses in areas of the City that d had previously been undeveloped. However, the City has in place policies and programs in its Land Use E Element and Natural Resources and Conservation Element to sufficiently protect biological resources and 0 mitigate potential impacts.Therefore,impacts related to the General Plan Update were determined to be less (D than significant. o 5.4.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project Ln T N Substantial New New 0 Change in Information Mitigation or N Project or Showing Alternative to Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor rY Resulting in Significant Significant Technical New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or ru Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. would the project: m a) Have a substantial adverse effect, u) either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species w identified as a candidate,sensitive, or special status species in local or X U regional plans,policies,or o regulations,or by the California E Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other a sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, LL X policies,regulations or by the r California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife s U Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on Q federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean w Water Act(including,but not limited E to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal,etc.) X through direct removal,filling, Q hydrological interruption,or other means? Page 64 •The Planning Center January 2012 5. Environmental Analysis Substantial New New ° N Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to Z Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical d New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact ° c d) Interfere substantially with the E movement of any native resident or ¢ migratory fish or wildlife species or . with established native resident or X o migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife c m nursery sites? E e) Conflict with any local policies or o ordinances protecting biological X resources,such as a tree o reservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, n Natural Community Conservation X Plan,or other approved local, N regional,or state habitat o conservation plan? .y Comments: W f) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species a identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans,policies,or m regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? N No Impact.The project areas are located within highly urbanized areas of the City of San Bernardino and iE consist of a variety of urban uses.The project areas have been heavily disturbed in the past and are not in m their natural condition. The station areas and surrounding areas consist of a mix of existing land uses, including residential, commercial, retail, office, institutional, and civic. No natural biological resources or communities existed in the areas of the proposed project in 2005 at the time the 2005 General Plan Update E was analyzed under the SBGPU EIR and no such resources exist at the present time. The site conditions c have not changed since then.Additionally,future development anticipated under the proposed project would v occur within the same development envelope of the parcels included in the General Plan land use map and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. LL Three of the project's station areas (Stations 11 through 13) however abut the Santa Ana River Wash.The d wash is within Critical Habitat Unit 1 (Santa Ana River and San Timoteo Canyon),which is designated critical E habitat for San Bernardino kangaroo rat and California gnatcatcher.As with the 2005 General Plan Update, m development of these areas under the proposed project could impact critical habitat of the Santa Ana River C Wash. However, as outlined in the SBGPU EIR, project applicants would be required to consult with the appropriate agencies regarding potential impacts to listed species that the wash habitat may support,and would also be required to comply with regulatory requirements,including permitting,to offset any identified E impacts. For example,development projects would be subject to current regulations protecting waters and @ wetlands, including the requirements of Section 404 permits from the United States Army Corps of a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 65 fi;E.g S. Environmental Analysis T Engineers, US fish and Wildlife Services review, Section 401 water quality certification, and the California N Department of Fish and Game 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreements. T 6 z Additionally,to minimize the impacts to sensitive plant communities and wildlife species along the Santa Ana River Wash, the 2005 General Plan Update outlines goals and policies related to the protection of open v space and wildlife habitat. Future development within the areas associated with Stations 11 through 13 c would be reviewed for consistency with the established goals and policies of the 2005 General Plan Update. Furthermore, at the time individual development applications are submitted for development within these Q three station areas, the City will assess development proposals for potential impacts to significant natural resources pursuant to CEQA and associated state and federal regulations and City ordinances. 0 Therefore,as with the 2005 General Plan Update,the proposed project would not have a significant impact m on or interfere with any species, habitat, natural community,riparian area,wetland,migratory fish or wildlife, E OL or migratory wildlife corridor identified by any local, regional, state or federal agency. v g) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community o identified in local or regional plans,policies, regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? T No Impact. See response to Section 5.4.2(a), above. c h) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the 0 Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct > w removal,filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. See response to Section 5.4.2(a), above. w a i) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of U) native wildlife nursery sites? 0 w No Impact. See response to Section 5.4.2(a), above. Additionally, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 m (META)implements the United States'commitment to four treaties with Canada,Japan,Mexico,and Russia c) 0 for the protection of shared migratory bird resources. The MBTA governs the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests. The US Fish and Wildlife E Service administers permits to take migratory birds in accordance with the MBTA.As standard practice,the City requires that project applicants comply with the MBTA by either avoiding grading activities during the nesting season (February 15 to August 15)or conducting a site survey for nesting birds prior to commencing a grading activities.As with future development associated with the 2005 General Plan Update,development LL associated with the proposed project would be required to comply with the provisions of this regulatory requirement. Adherence to the MBTA regulations would ensure that if construction occurs during the E breeding season,appropriate measures would be taken to avoid impacts to nesting birds,if any are found in E any of the individual development sites of project areas. With adherence to the MBTA requirements, no A significant impact would occur. j) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree w preservation policy or ordinance? E r v 0 No Impact. As with future project development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, future a development of the project's station areas would be required to comply with relevant policies and ordinances Page 66 •The Planning Center January 2012 B.E.g S. Environmental Analysis relating to the protection and preservation of biological resources within the City. For example, City ° Ordinance MC-1027,9-8-98 and MC-682 regulate the removal of mature trees.As with the 2005 General Plan Update,future development anticipated under the proposed project would not conflict with any local policies o Z protecting biological resources. Z m k) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? E No Impact. No adopted habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans existed in the City in 2005 at the time the 2005 General Plan Update was analyzed under the SBGPU EIR and no such o plans exist at the present time. The San Bernardino Valley-Wide Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan U (MSHCP) has been and is still in the development stages. Upon approval and adoption of the San a Bernardino Valley-Wide MSHCP,and participation by the City,future development projects within the station E areas that would fall within the MSHCP boundary(if any)would be required to comply with the requirements o of the MSHCP. Therefore, as with the 2005 General Plan Update, no significant impact to any habitat i conservation plan or natural community conservation plan would occur as a result of future development o anticipated under the proposed project. e 5.4.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed r, Project N C Mitigation measures outlined in the SBGPU EIR related to biological resources would not be applicable to °- N the proposed project. ce 5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 4 ru 5.5.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR =a 0 With regards to historical, archeological and paleontological resources, the SBGPU EIR concluded that y future development in accordance with the 2005 General Plan Update,which included development of the project's station areas, would not have a significant impact on or interfere with any such resources with implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in the SBGPU EIR. y U 5.5.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project E v c Substantial New New v Change in Information Mitigation or Q Project or Showing Alternative to Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor LL Resulting in New Significant Significant Technical Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change Q in the significance of a historical X c resource as defined in§15064.5? d b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an X x archaeological resource pursuant to a §15064.5? Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Page 67 17-9 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis Substantial New New 0 N Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to 6 Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor ? Resulting in New Significant Significant Technical v Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact c m c) Directly or indirectly destroy a E unique paleontological resource or X 4 site or unique geologic feature? v d) Disturb any human remains, o U including those interred outside of X formal cemeteries? d E 0. 0 Comments: > m 0 a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? u� No Impact. Section 15064.5 defines historic resources as resources listed or determined to be eligible for N listing by the State Historical Resources Commission, a local register of historical resources, or the lead o agency. Generally a resource is considered to be "historically significant" if it meets one of the following D criteria: d i) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; w D Q. ii) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; m iii) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or d represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or m iv Has yielded,or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. o Future development anticipated under the proposed project would occur similar to and as permitted under the City's General Plan. Development associated with the proposed project would occur within the same project area boundaries included in the General Plan land use map and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. v Additionally, future development projects anticipated under the proposed project would be required to a adhere to the mitigation measures outlined in the SBGPU EIR, which are reproduced at the end of this v. section.For example,as outlined in Mitigation Measure GP 5.4-1,in areas of documented or inferred historic resource presence, City staff shall require applicants for development permits to provide studies to m document the presence/absence of historical resources.Therefore,as with development associated with the E 2005 General Plan Update,future development anticipated under the proposed project would not have a significant impact on historical resources. a b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? E E U A No Impact. As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, the likelihood for the a discovery of archeological or paleontological resources or the impact to such resources is not considered Page 68 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 244 5. Environmental Analysis significant with future development anticipated under the propose project.The project areas and immediate ° surroundings are not recognized as an area having the potential for subsurface archeological or paleontological resources.The project areas have been heavily disturbed in the past for a variety of land 6 uses and are in an urbanized area of the City.The project area conditions underthe proposed project remain similar as with those considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. a� Additionally,future development anticipated underthe proposed project would occurwithin the same project E area boundaries analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. Furthermore,future development projects resulting from the a proposed project would be required to adhere to the mitigation measures outlined in the SBGPU EIR,which C are reproduced at the end of this section. For example,as outlined in Mitigation Measure GP 5.4-2,in areas of documented or inferred archeological and/or paleontological resource presence, City staff shall require c applicants for development permits to provide studies to document the presence/absence of such c) resources.Therefore,as with the 2005 General Plan Update,the proposed project would not have an impact 0 on archeological or paleontological resources. a 0 c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d 0 No Impact.See response to Section 5.5.2(a),above.Additionally,there were no unique geological features in any of the project areas or adjacent to or surrounding the project areas at the time the 2005 General Plan N Update was being considered and this fact has not changed under the proposed project.Therefore,project implementation would not destroy any unique geological features. N C d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 0 N > No Impact. As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, the likelihood for the l . W discovery of human remains or the impact to such resources is not considered significant with future development anticipated under the propose project. Development anticipated under the proposed project w would occur within the same project area boundaries included in the General Plan land use map and D Q. analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.The project areas and immediate surroundings are also not recognized as an a area having the potential for human remains.Additionally,the project areas have been heavily disturbed in w the past for a variety of land uses and are in an urbanized area of the City.The project area conditions under the proposed project remain similar as with those considered in the 2005 General Plan Update.Furthermore, future development projects resulting from the proposed project would be required to adhere to the d mitigation measures outlined in the SBGPU EIR, which are reproduced at the end of this section. For L) example,Mitigation Measure GP 5.4-2 outlines a number of steps that are required to be taken in the even of a discovery of human remains.Therefore,as with the 2005 General Plan Update,the proposed project would E not have an impact on human remains. d v 5.5.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed .o Project a LL The following mitigation measures are included in the SBGPU EIR and would apply to development within v the project's station areas. E U 10 GP 5.4-1 In areas of documented or inferred historic resource presence,City staff shall require applicants a for development permits to provide studies to document the presence/absence of historical resources.On properties where historic structures or resources are identified,such studies shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ s preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified historical preservation expert. U Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 69 Packet P 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis GP 5.4-2 In areas of documented or inferred archeological and/or paleontological resource presence,City N staff shall require applicants for development permits to provide studies to document the presence/absence of such resources. On properties where resources are identified, such 6 studies shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified cultural d E preservation expert. a c d GP 5.4-3 In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location E Q other than a dedicated cemetery,the following steps shall be taken: 0 There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably r suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the San Bernardino County Coroner is contacted to determine if the remains are prehistoric and that no investigation of the cause of E death is required.If the coroner determines the remainsto be Native American,then the coroner 0 shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission with in 24 hours, and the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most ❑ likely descendent from the deceased Native American.The most likely descendant may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98; or N Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or his authorized representative shall 0 rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendation of the most likely descendant or on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbances: of w • The Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a most likely descendant or a the likely descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified c7 m by the commission; or m v m • The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation; or r m • The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the o descendant, and the mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. C 5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS v Q 5.6.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR u C The SBGPU EIR concluded that due to the proximity and location of several earthquakes faults that occur in E an near the City, all structures within the City of San Bernardino may be subject to seismic related impacts t from severe ground-shaking. Further, many sites within the City are located in areas with high and m moderately high liquefaction potential, which can be induced by seismic activity. Therefore, the EIR C concluded that City of San Bernardino residents, visitors, and workers would be subjected to potential seismic-related hazards in the buildout of the General Plan. However, all development in the City of San m Bernardino would be required to follow the California Building Code, which regulates construction and Ec design to ensure safety from seismic activity.The EIR thus concluded that upon consideration of regulatory m requirements and standard conditions of approval the impacts would be less then significant. Page 70 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 246 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis Another geological impact resulting from buildout of the General Plan Update is soil instability.The SBGPU ° EIR concluded that because the City lies within a geologic unit that contains soil types that are susceptible to wind and water erosion,development in areas characterized by such soil types may result in substantial soil o erosion or the loss of topsoil. Additionally, the EIR also found that there is the potential to encounter Z expansive soils within the City, and that as a result there is a potential for risks to life or property due to E structural collapse as a result of construction on expansive soils.As with ground shaking impacts,however, -a regulatory requirements like the California Building Code would render impacts less than significant. d E 5.6.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project C d 0 0 U Substantial New New m Change in Information Mitigation or E Project or Showing Alternative to o Q. Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical Q New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or .. Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,injury,or o death involving: N i) Rupture of a known d earthquake fault,as delineated = err on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning w Map,issued by the State Geologist for the area or based X C� on other substantial evidence m u) of a known fauh?Refer to -o Division of Mines and Geology ;m� Special Publication 42. r ii) Strong seismic ground X j shaking? 0 iii) Seismic-related ground failure, X including liquefaction? a b) Result in substantial soil erosion or X the loss of topsoil? v c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil o that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the LL project,and potentially result in on- X or off-site landslide,lateral E spreading,subsidence,liquefaction s U or collapse? R d) Be located on expansive soil,as Q defined in Table 1 B-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994), X creating substantial risks to life or E property? u a a I Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Page 71 7 5. Environmental Analysis Substantial New New 0 N Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to Z Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical v New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact w e) Have soils incapable of adequately E supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal X v systems where sewers are not 0 U available for the disposal of waste c water? E CL 0 Z Comments: d 0 a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo N Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other c substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special .7 Publication 42. m o: No Impact. As stated in the SBGPU EIR and shown in Figure S-3, Alquist-Priolo Study Zones, of the City's General Plan Safety Element, the project's station areas are not within an established Alquist- w Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. However, three faults traverse the City as shown in Figure S-3, which IL include the San Jacinto, Glen Helen, and San Andreas Faults. All of these faults are designated as rn Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones and are considered as active faults. The San Jacinto Fault is in y close proximityto three of the project'station areas(Stations 10 through 12).A rupture of this fault could m expose people or structures in those station areas to potentially substantial adverse effects,including the C risk of loss, injury, or death. Additionally, all of the project's station areas are in a seismically active 0 region and occasional seismic ground shaking is likely to occur within the lifetime of the proposed 0 development. E However,the project area is not at greater risk of seismic activity or impacts than other sites in southern d California. Seismic shaking is a risk throughout southern California. Additionally, the state regulates development in California through a variety of tools that reduce hazards from earthquakes and other a geologic hazards.The 2010 California Building Code(CBC;California Code of Regulations,Title 24,Part LL 2)contains provisions to safeguard against major structural failures or loss of life caused by earthquakes or other geologic hazards.As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update,future E development associated with the proposed project would be required to adhere to the provisions of the CBC, which are imposed on project developments by the City during the building plan check and m development review process. Compliance with the requirements of the 2010 CBC for structural safety Q during a seismic event would reduce hazards from strong seismic ground shaking along one of the three ji faults that traverse the City.Therefore,significant impacts resulting from rupture of a known earthquake E fault and strong seismic ground shaking would not occur. s U m Q Page 72 •The Planning Center January 2012 S. Environmental Analysis ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ° N No Impact. See response to Section 5.6.2(a), above. 6 Z ill) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? E v No Impact.As disclosed in the SBGPU EIR and shown in Figure S-5, Liquefaction Susceptibility,some of the project's station areas (Stations 7 through 13) lie within areas susceptible to high liquefaction. E Future development anticipated under the proposed project would occur within the same areas considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR,and would be susceptible c to the same level of potential impacts from liquefaction.However,as standard procedure,future grading v Y and soil compaction activities associated with development anticipated under the proposed project would require the preparation of specific grading plans, soils and geotechnical reports (which must E CL address liquefaction, subsidence, and other potential soil stability hazards), and hydrology studies, o which are required to be submitted to and reviewed and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any grading activities. Submittal of these technical plans and studies would ensure o that hazards arising from liquefaction and other seismic ground failures would not occur,as they would be prepared in accordance with current grading and engineering standards outlined in the most recent N CBC. Therefore, significant impacts resulting from liquefaction would not occur. N b) Result Insubstantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c 0 N No Impact. As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, future development r '� associated with the proposed project would involve excavation, grading, and construction activities that X would disturb soil and leave exposed soil on the ground surface. Common means of soil erosion from X construction sites include water,wind,and being tracked offsite by vehicles.These activities could result in w soil erosion. However, development within the project areas is subject to local and state codes and a requirements for erosion control and grading during construction.As with development anticipated under the 0 General Plan,future development associated with the proposed project would be required to comply with w standard regulations, including South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules 402 and 403, which would reduce construction erosion impacts. Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best 2 available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere v beyond the property line of the emissions source. Rule 402 requires dust suppression techniques be v implemented to prevent dust and soil erosion from creating a nuisance offsite. ° E 0 Additionally, the Construction General Permit (CGP) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), effective July 1, 2010, regulates construction activities to minimize water pollution, including sediment. The anticipated improvements that would occur within the project areas would be subject to 0 National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permitting regulations,including the development 4 and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is further discussed in U. Section 5.9,Hydrology and Water Quality,of this Addendum.Specifically,the CGP requires the preparation and implementation of a SWPPP for project sites of one acre or greater, which would include but not be E limited to the following: @ • Determine risk level for impacts of sediment from site to receiving waters. 4 c 0 • Specify actions the project will take to minimize sediment transport from construction sites. z U (9 Such actions include best management practices(BMPs).Types of BMPs that are incorporated in SWPPPs a include: Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 73 PacketPg. 249 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis • Erosion controls:cover and/or bind soil surface,to prevent soil particles from being detached and N •transported by water or wind. Erosion control BMPs include mulch, soil binders, and mats. 6 Z • Sediment controls: Filter out soil particles that have been detached and transported in water. Sediment control BMPs include barriers, and cleaning measures such as street sweeping. w E v • Tracking controls: Tracking control BMPs minimize the tracking of soil offsite by vehicles; for instance, stabilizing construction roadways and entrances/exits. ¢ d The SWPPP must include BMPs to eliminate and/or minimize soil erosion prior to and during construction 0 and show the placement of those BMPs. Additionally, the SWPPP must contain among other things a sediment monitoring plan if the site discharges directly to a water body listed on the 303(d)list far sediment. The construction contractor of future development anticipated under the proposed project would be required E OL to prepare and implement a SWPPP in compliance with the CGP during construction. Adherence to the c BMPs in the SWPPP would reduce, prevent, and or minimize soil erosion.Therefore, soil erosion impacts d from grading and construction activities associated with future development anticipated under the proposed o project would not occur. co LO e c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, N liquefaction,or collapse. c .T No Impact. As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update and as standard > procedure,future grading and soil compaction activities associated with development anticipated underthe proposed project requires the preparation of specific grading plans,soils and geotechnical reports (which �_ must address liquefaction, subsidence, and other potential soil stability hazards), and hydrology studies, w which are required to be submitted to and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the a commencement of any grading activities.Submittal of these technical plans and studies would ensure that m hazards arising from lateral spreading, subsidence or collapsible soils would not occur, as they would be y prepared in accordance with current grading and engineering standards outlined in the most recent CBC. T Additionally,additional testing for soils would be required following rough grading and prior to construction C of foundations and other concrete work to confirm these conditions.Therefore,impacts resulting from lateral spreading, subsidence or collapsible soils would not occur. C d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 19-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), E creating substantial risks to life or property? v No Impact. See response to Section 5.6.2(c), above. Q W e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? E E No Impact. As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, no septic tanks or R alternative wastewater disposal systems would be proposed for future development anticipated under the a proposed project. Future development would require connection to existing sewers mainlines and service lines,which are currently available in the surround roadways of the project areas.Therefore, impacts from alternative wastewater disposal systems would not occur. E E v m >r Page 74 •The Planning Center January 2012 5. Environmental Analysis 5.6.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed ° N project r 6 Z No mitigation measures related to geology and soils were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. C d 5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS v c W 5.7.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR E a Greenhouse gas emission(GHG) impacts were not analyzed in the SBGPU EIR,because the requirement to c analyze GHG in environmental documents did not become effective until the adoption of AB 32 and the SB v 97 amendments (adopted December 31, 2009, effective March 18, 2010) to the CEQA Guidelines, which occurred after the adoption date (November 1, 2005) of the 2005 General Plan Update and its associated E CL SBGPU EIR by the San Bernardino City Council. Prior to the adoption of AB 32 and SB 97, GHG emissions o had not yet been generally recognized as an environmental issue.Therefore,the analysis of GHG emissions is new in this Addendum. p 5.7.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project Ln N Substantial New New c Change in Information Mitigation or N Project or Showing Alternative to > Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. would the project: a a) Generate greenhouse gas m N emissions,either directly or •p indirectly,that may have a X °LLD significant impact on the r environment? U b) Conflict with an applicable plan, o policy or regulation adopted for the X E purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? O c m v a a Comments: ' a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? E v m No Impact. Global climate change is not confined to a particular project area and is generally accepted as a the consequence of global industrialization over the last 200 years.A typical project,even a very large one, does not generate enough GHG emissions on its own to influence global climate change significantly; d hence,the issue of global climate change is by definition a cumulative environmental impact. The State of E r California, through its governor and its legislature, has established a comprehensive framework for the substantial reduction of GHG emissions over the next 40-plus years. This will occur primarily through the a implementation of AB 32 and SB 375,which will address GHG emissions on a statewide cumulative basis. Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 75 6.E.g S. Environmental Analysis A regional GHG emissions inventory is being prepared by SANBAG for the County of San Bernardino and N participating cities, including the City of San Bernardino.Although the character of the station areas would change and mixed uses would be introduced under the proposed project,the uses themselves would not be Z new as they are already permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations. The TD and associated zoning regulations,development standards,and design guidelines would encourage a mix and w intensity of land use around sbX transit stations that would foster transit-usage and encourage walking/biking a and would implement the land use and transportation strategies of the City's General Plan. The project would establish more compact land use patterns to facilitate shorter travel distances and alternative travel E modes.The project would also reduce commute distances by providing housing close to transit. 0 Consequently,the proposed project has the potential to reduce transportation-related GHG emissions within the City (the largest GHG sector) and support the GHG reduction goals of AB 32. As with development d anticipated under the General Plan Update,most project-related development projects(including mixed use) E would require a project-level environmental analysis at the time development plans are submitted to the City. 0 As a part of the environmental review, a project-specific GHG analysis for most projects would also be required.Future development projects anticipated under the proposed project would be required to adhere 0 to statewide measures adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, including the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards (part of the California Building Code)and the California Green Building Code �r (CALGreen).Additional measures to reduce project-level GHG emissions impacts would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, based on their potential to exceed SCAOMD's GHG significance thresholds. N Furthermore,the City is currently preparing a Sustainability,Master Plan(SMP)that will set the City on a path o toward achieving the GHG reduction goals of AB 32 (City of San Bernardino 2010). Once adopted,future N projects consistent with the qualified GHG reduction plan would not result in GHG emissions impacts. Therefore, significant impacts would not occur. W W b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the w emissions of greenhouse gases? a ca No Impact.The California Air Resources Board (GARB)adopted the Scoping Plan on December 11,2008. Umi The Scoping Plan is California's GHG reduction strategy to achieve the state's GHG emissions reduction a target established by AB 32,which are 1990 levels by year 2020.AB 32 requires California to reduce its GHG emissions by approximately 29 percent below business-as-usual. CARB identified reduction measures to achieve this goal as set forth in the Scoping Plan.Thus, projects that are consistent with the Scoping Plan 0 are also consistent with the 29 percent reduction below business-as-usual required by AB 32. The City of San Bernardino is in the process of creating a SMP that will set the City on a path toward achieving the GHG reduction goals of AB 32 (City of San Bernardino 2010). The TD and associated zoning regulations, development standards,and design guidelines would encourage a mix and intensity of land use around sbX v transit stations that would foster transit-usage and encourage walking/biking and would implement the land a use and transportation strategies of the General Plan and SMP to promote infill development.Consequently, implementation of the proposed project would be consistent with the GHG reduction goals of AB 32 and would not conflict with plans adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. E 5.7.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed Project Q This topic was not analyzed in the SBGPU EIR and therefore no mitigation measures related to GHG emissions were outlined.Moreover,because the proposed project would not emit significant levels of GHG, E this impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. @ a Page 76 •The Planning Center 3013 Packet Pg. 252 5. Environmental Analysis 5.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ° N r 5.8.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR Z The SBGPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would result in an increase in the E frequency of transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials associated with commercial and industrial growth within the City. Other impacts addressed in the SBGPU EIR include the presence of properties d identified on the CERCLIS list, presence of the San Bernardino International Airport, and the City's E susceptibility to wildland fires. Increased development resulting from implementation of the City's General Plan, including the station areas associated with the proposed project,would expose additional structures c and persons to these hazards. However, upon implementation of General Plan policies, regulatory requirements, and standard conditions of approval, impacts would be less than significant. E 5.8.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project o m d 0 Substantial New New Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or o Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact N Vlll. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. would the project: °> a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through X Cl w the routine transport,use,or D disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the co public or the environment through U) reasonably foreseeable upset and X v accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into d the environment? c) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ° hazardous or acutely hazardous E materials,substances,or waste X within one-quarter mile of an m existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is a included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 X m and,as a result,would it create a E significant hazard to the public or the environment? Q m E t U R M Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Page 77 Packet Pg. 253 6.E.g S. Environmental Analysis 0 Substantial New New N Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor ? Resulting in Significant Significant Technical d New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact v e) For a project located within an E airport land use plan or,where such a a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or 0 public use airport,would the project X result in a safety hazard for people d residing or working in the project E a area? o f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project d 0 result in a safely hazard for people X .. residing or working in the project D a area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted X N emergency response plan or o emergency evacuation Ian? N h) Expose people or structures to a > significant risk of loss,injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are X w adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed a with wildlands? m U) v m w Comments: r d U a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or o disposal of hazardous materials? E a No Impact.Implementation of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public orthe m environment through the routine transport,use or disposal of hazardous materials orthrough the foreseeable v upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials.Although mixed-use would be a a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the proposed project,the uses themselves would LL be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations and were already c considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.As concluded in the SPGPU E EIR, no significant impacts would occur with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update and no such significant impacts would occur under future development associated with the proposed project. Additionally, as with future development anticipated under the General Plan Update, the use, a storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials by residential and nonresidential land uses associated with the proposed project would be required to comply with existing regulations of several E agencies, including the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA),Occupational Safety&Health Administration(OSHA),Caltrans,and San Bernardino City Fire a Department.Compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing the use,storage,and transportation of hazardous materials would ensure that all potentially hazardous materials are used and handled in an Page 78 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg.254 5. Environmental Analysis appropriate manner,and would minimize the potential for safety impacts to occur.Therefore, no significant 9 N impact would occur. 6 b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset Z and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? E No Impact. See response to Section 5.8.2(a), above. d E c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or w waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? c U M No Impact. As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, future development t m associated with the proposed project would not result in the placement of hazardous waste generating E facilities within one quarter mile of a school.The various land uses that would be developed in the various o 0. station areas under the proposed project would consist of a mix of uses(e.g.,residential,commercial,office, w institutional) that are not considered emitters, producers or handlers of large quantities of hazardous o materials,substance,or waste. Industrial uses,which are the primary hazardous waste generating facilities in the City,are currently concentrated along existing industrial corridors and that would not change under the T proposed project. Therefore, no significant impact would occur. N d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the °- N public or the environment? '> No Impact.As outlined in the SBGPU EIR,the Norton AFB and the Newmark Groundwater Contamination site are listed on the NPL.The CERCLIS list also identified 6 other sites within the City with hazardous waste w contamination. While many of these sites do not have a remediation plan, the existing federal and state a environmental regulations in place prevent the reuse of the site without standards for cleanup under m CERCLIS, and in some cases RCRA. None of the station areas associated with the proposed project was rn included on the CERCLIS list.This condition remains unchanged and as with development anticipated under d the 2005 General Plan Update, future development in accordance with the proposed project would not ?_ create a significant hazard to the public or environment.Additionally,the proposed project would not change the site boundaries of the station areas that were analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. Therefore, no significant L) impact would occur. E e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? C No Impact.As shown in Figure LU-4,San Bernardino International Airport Planning Boundaries,none of the station areas associated with the proposed project are within the airport influence area or in any of the a airport's runway protection,safety,ortraffic pattern zones.Additionally,none of the station areas associated E with the proposed project are within the vicinity of a private air strip.Therefore, no significant airport-related m impacts would occur. 4 Y Q For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for m people residing or working in the project area? E n No Impact. See response to Section 5.8.2(e), above. a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 79 r, 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or N emergency evacuation plan? 0 Z No Impact.As concluded in the SPGPU EIR,no significant impacts to the adopted countywide Emergency Management Plan—which is prepared and overseen by the San Bernardino County Fire Department Office of Emergency Services—would occur with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update a and no such significant impacts would occur under future development associated with the proposed project. Although mixed-use would be a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the Q proposed project,the uses themselves would be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan (D and zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the o SBGPU EIR. v d Additionally, all construction activities associated with future development associated with the proposed E CL project would be required to be performed per the City's and San Bernardino City Fire Department's o standards and regulations.Future project-related development project would also be required to go through > the City's development review and permitting process and would be required to incorporate all applicable p design and safety standards and regulations as set forth in the CBC and the City's Municipal Code and by San Bernardino City Fire Department, to ensure that they do not interfere with the provision of local ar emergency services (e.g., provision of adequate access roads to accommodate emergency response vehicles, adequate numbers/locations of fire hydrants, etc.). N C Therefore, no significant impact to the adopted countywide Emergency Management Plan would occur. N d h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, �-- including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? w D o. No Impact.As shown in Figure S-9, Fire Hazard Areas,of the City's General Plan Safety Element, none of m the project's station areas are within a fire hazard area. The project's station areas are in developed, rn urbanized areas and are not adjacent to wildlands that could be subject to wildland fires. Therefore, the 'O„ proposed project would not increase risks related to wildland fires or expose people or structures to w significant risk of wildland fires. m U 5.8.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed 0� Project E No mitigation measures related to hazards and hazardous materials were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. v Q 5.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY LL 5.9.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR E z Multiple impacts to hydrology and water quality resulting from the General Plan Update were identified in the m SBGPU EIR. Firstly, full buildout of the General Plan Update would result in an increase in construction, creating the potential for short-term unquantifiable increases in pollutant concentrations from the individual project sites.After project development the quality of storm runoff may be altered.Additionally, portions of the City are located within a 100-year flood hazard area, as well as within the inundation area of the Seven E Oaks Dam. Therefore, development occurring in these areas has the potential to expose structures and occupants to flood hazards. Lastly, debris carried by the Santa Ana River has the potential to fill or plug 4 structures designed to collect and convey runoff resulting in floodwaters being forced into adjacent areas. Page 80 a The Planning Center January 2012 PacketPg. 256 6.E.g S. Environmental Analysis The SBGPU EIR also identified mudflows as similarly dangerous phenomena with potential to occur in San N Bernardino. 0 However, due to the limited availability of vacant land for development,the amount of impervious surface Z added by buildout of the General Plan would be limited. Impacts to stormwater quantity and quality would consequently be limited. Additionally, existing drainage patterns would not be significantly altered by E implementation of the plan.Potential impacts dueto mudflows and inundation would also be reduced dueto d policies and regulations contained in the General Plan to limit development in areas susceptible to these E phenomena.Therefore,the SBGPU EIR concluded that all hydrological and water quality impacts resulting m from implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. o U 5.9.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project v E CL 0 Substantial New New Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative Circumstances Greater to Reduce Minor O v Resulting in New Significant Significant Technical Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: o a) Violate any water quality Ln standards or waste discharge X v requirements? V. �. w b) Substantially deplete v` groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater a recharge such that there would U be a net deficit in aquifer volume co or a lowering of the local v groundwater table level(e.g.,the X w production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support o existing land uses or planned E uses for which permits have been granted)? c c) Substantially after the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the a alteration of the course of a LL stream or river,in a manner X c which would result in a v E substantial erosion or siltation U on-or off-site? m Q c W E L U 16 ® a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 81 Packet Pg. 257 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis 0 Substantial New New N Change m Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative Circumstances Greater to Reduce Minor Z Resulting in New Significant Significant Technical d Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact d d) Substantially after the existing £ drainage pattern of the site or ¢ area,including through the alteration of the course of a U stream or river,or substantially X increase the rate or amount of m surface runoff in a manner which E would result in flooding on-or o off-site? d e) create or contribute runoff water c which would exceed the capacity .. of existing or planned storm X water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? N f) Otherwise substantially degrade X water quality? c g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or w other flood hazard delineation map? a h) Place within a 100-year flood m hazard area structures which y would impede or redirect flood X d flows? i) Expose people or structures to a v significant risk of loss,injury or death involving flooding, X including flooding as a result of E the failure of a levee or dam? a j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, ` or mud0ow? X LL Comments: c W E a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? m No Impact. Future development associated with the proposed project would not violate any water quality 4 standard or waste discharge requirement or substantially degrade water quality.Although mixed-use would be a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the proposed project, the uses themselves E would be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.As concluded in the 2 SPGPUEIR, no significant water quality impacts would occur with development anticipated under the 2005 ¢ Page 82 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 558 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis General Plan Update and no such significant impacts would occur under future development associated with ° N the proposed project. 0 Additionally, the Construction General Permit (CGP) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board Z (SWRCB), effective July 1, 2010, regulates construction activities to minimize water pollution, including sediment. As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, future development c associated with the proposed project would be subject to National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting regulations, including the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution E Prevention Plan(SWPPP).Specifically,the CGP requires the preparation and implementation of a SWPPP for project sites of one acre or greater,which would include but not be limited to the following: o 0 • Determine risk level for impacts of sediment from site to receiving waters. • Specify actions the project will take to minimize sediment transport from construction sites. E OL 0 Such actions include best management practices(BMPs).Types of BMPs that are incorporated in SWPPPs include: 0 • Erosion controls: cover and/or bind soil surface,to prevent soil particles from being detached and transported by water or wind. Erosion control BMPs include mulch, soil binders, and mats. N • Sediment controls: Filter out soil particles that have been detached and transported in water. Sediment control BMPs include barriers, and cleaning measures such as street sweeping. 0 '> M • Tracking controls: Tracking control BMPs minimize the tracking of soil offsite by vehicles; for • M X instance, stabilizing construction roadways and entrances/exits. �� w • Non-stormwater management: Prohibit discharge of materials other than stormwater, such as =a discharges from the cleaning,maintenance,and fueling of vehicles and equipment.Non-stormwater management BMPs also prescribe conducting various construction operations, including paving, of grinding,and concrete curing and finishing,in ways that minimize non-stormwater discharges and a contamination of any such discharges. c r d • Waste and Materials Management:management of materials and wastes to avoid contamination of 0 0 stormwater.Waste and materials management BMPs include spill prevention and control,stockpile management, and management of solid wastes and hazardous wastes. £E v c The SWPPP must include BMPs to eliminate and/or minimize stormwater pollution prior to and during v construction and show the placement of those BMPs. Additionally, the SWPPP must contain a visual Q monitoring program;a chemical monitoring program for nonvisible pollutants to be implemented if there is a u failure of BMPs;and a sediment monitoring plan if the site discharges directly to a water body listed on the 303(d)list for sediment.The construction contractors of future development anticipated under the proposed project would be required to prepare and implement a SWPPP in compliance with the CGP during £E construction.Adherence to the BMPs in the SWPPP would reduce,prevent,minimize,and/or treat pollutants @ and prevent degradation of downstream receiving waters. Q The City's Municipal Code also requires all future development of one acre or more to manage stormwater d from construction sites in a manner that would reduce impacts to water quality. Therefore, no significant E water quality impact would occur. a Addendum to San Bernardino Genera[Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 83 Packet Pg. 259 '6.Eg 5. Environmental Analysis b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge N such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would Z not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? m No Impact.As concluded in the SBGPU EIR,the 2005 General Plan Update would not result in a significant reduction in groundwater recharge due to the limited amount of vacant area available for development that could be turned into impervious surfaces. Although the project's station areas consist of some scattered E vacant parcels,the proposed project would not change the site boundaries of the station areas that were considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. Additionally, the vacant o parcels associated with the proposed project are in highly urbanized areas of the City and are not Y considered groundwater recharge areas.Therefore,no significant impacts to groundwater recharge would m occur. E 0. 0 c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration > of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or p siltation on-or off-site? CD LO v No Impact.As concluded in the SPGPUEIR, no significant on-or offsite erosion or flooding impacts would occur with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update and no such significant impacts N would occur under future development associated with the proposed project.Although mixed-use would be c a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the proposed project,the uses themselves would be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. As also concluded in the a: SBGPU EIR, any impacts to the drainage pattern and potential erosion hazards would be mitigated on a W project-by-project basis by adherence to NPDES requirements as well as the City's Municipal Code,which w includes provisions for onsite stormwater retention for undeveloped properties of one acre or more in size. y Additionally, the City's General Plan contains methods to reduce erosion through goals, policies, and m programs related to the protection of the drainage systems. Furthermore, as a standard requirement of all rn new developments, project applicants are required to submit for review and approval by the City m comprehensive grading and drainage plansfor construction projects.The plans are required to demonstrate r how surface water will be collected onsite and conveyed to existing storm drain facilities. Therefore, no (D significant impact would occur. L) 0 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration E of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in r a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? v Q No Impact. See response to Section 5.9.2(c), above. LL e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm d water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? EE U A No Impact. As concluded in the SBGPU EIR, implementation of the General Plan Update may alter the a existing localized (project level)drainage patterns within the San Bernardino area and increase the amount of impervious surfaces through the continued development of vacant areas.Some of these vacant areas(in m the form of vacant parcels) are located within various station areas of the proposed project. However, as E L stated in the SBGPU EIR, new development would be required to size storm water drainage facilities appropriately.As a standard requirement of all new developments,project applicants are required to submit G for review and approval by the City comprehensive grading and drainage plans for construction projects.The Page 84 •The Planning Center January 2012 5. Environmental Analysis plans are required to demonstrate how surface water will be collected onsite and conveyed to existing storm N drain facilities.Additionally,the proposed project would not change the site boundaries of the station areas that were considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. Therefore, no c Z significant impacts on the stormwater drainage system would occur. c d Q Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? c m No Impact. See response to Section 5.9.2(a),above. E Q m g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary o or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? c m No Impact.As shown in Figure S-1, 100-Year Flood Plain, none of the project's station areas are located o within a 100-year flood zone as indicated on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance o Rate Map (FIRM) covering the project area.Therefore,as with development anticipated under the General > Plan Update,development associated with the proposed project would not place people or structures at risk o of flooding in a 100-year flood zone and would not place structures in 100-year flood zones that would redirect flood flows.Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? N No Impact. See response to Section 5.9.2(g). y i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, ` . W a.. including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? w No Impact.As shown in Figure S-2, Seven Oaks Dam Inundation, a number of the project's station areas a (Stations 10 through 13)are within the dam inundation area of Seven Oaks Dam.Although mixed-use would m be a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the proposed project, the uses themselves would be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.The proposed project y- would still allow these same permitted uses to be developed, but in a manner that would permit them to be y more closely integrated with each other in a horizontal or vertical manner. Additionally, as outlined in the SBGPU EIR,although failure of the dam in the event of a catastrophe would release a significant amount of ° water(approximately 145,600 acre-feet of water during flood conditions),the dam is engineered to withstand E an earthquake measuring 8.0 on the Richter scale,with any point able to sustain a displacement of four feet without causing any overall structural damage. Furthermore,the dam inundation areas shown in Figure S-2 reflect events of extremely remote nature. Finally,the City's General Plan contains policies that prohibit land use development in inundation-prone areas intended for human occupancy, which would limit risk to the Q population in the event of dam failure.Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. LL c m j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudflow? E U No Impact.The following describes potential impacts to people and structures from seiches,tsunamis,and Q mudflows. As demonstrated below, the proposed project would not expose people or structure to any of these hazards. m E Sekhe:A seiche is a surface wave created when an inland water body is shaken,usually by an earthquake. There are no bodies of water near the project's station areas that could pose a flood hazard due to a seiche or failure of an aboveground reservoir.Therefore, impacts from a seiche would not occur. a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 85 Packet P 5. Environmental Analysis Tsunami:A tsunami is a series of ocean waves caused by a sudden displacement of the ocean floor, most N often due to earthquakes. The project area is approximately 48 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. Therefore, impacts form a tsunami would not occur. Z Z Mudflow: A mudflow is a landslide composed of saturated rock debris and soil with a consistency of wet d cement. The project's station areas and surroundings are generally flat and highly urbanized. Therefore, impacts from a mudflow would not occur. E 5.9.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed Project c0 No mitigation measures related to hydrology and water quality were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. CL 5.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING CD 5.10.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR o m There are no significant land use impacts related to implementation of the San Bernardino General Plan LO Update.The certified EIR demonstrated that the plan would not divide an established community,and would I. not conflict with existing plans seeking to protect the environment, including habitat conservation plans. N Similarly,the EIR also concluded that implementation of the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan would not have c significant land use impacts as defined by CEQA Guidelines. n v 5.10.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project re M Substantial New New a Change in Information Mitigation or 0 Project or Showing Alternative to y Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in Significant Significant Technical New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or d Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact U X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. would the project: ° a) Physically divide an established E community? X c) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy,or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the a project(including,but not limited to W the general plan,specific plan,local X coastal program,orzoning E ordinance)adopted for the purpose = v of avoiding or mitigating an ;? environmental effect? Q d) Conflict with any applicable habitat 4 conservation plan or natural X v community conservation Ian? I E r U A Q Page 86 •The Planning Center January 2012 5. Environmental Analysis Comments: ° N a) Physically divide an established community? 6 Z Minor Technical Changes or Additions. Although the TD overlay would slightly modify existing development standards and the list of permitted/prohibited land uses within the project's station areas, it would not introduce any feature, element or incompatible land uses that would physically divide a v community. Additionally, under the proposed project, adequate transitions would be created between a primarily residential and commercial areas via mixed-use developments.The intent of the TD overlay is to m allow and encourage an appropriate mix and intensity of land uses in a compact pattern around the sbX o transit station areas,thereby creating a greater level of connectivity,cohesiveness and community form.The 0 City would also maintain the existing land use and zoning designations of the affected parcels in place under the proposed project.Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. E 0 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over > the project(including,but not limited to the general plan,specific plan,local coastal program,or o zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? v Minor Technical Changes or Additions.Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation. Development under the proposed project would occur as N permitted under and consistent with the City's General Plan.The City would maintain the existing land use c and zoning designations of the affected parcels in place under the proposed project.As noted above,with 0 the exception of the allowance of increased building heights (an increase of up to 4 stories in the �i '> Employment Center Station Areas and 5 stories in the Downtown Station Areas) and mixed use (e.g., ��. residential over office or commercial,office over commercial) in some station areas,future development of W the station areas anticipated under the proposed project would generally occur as permitted under the City's w General Plan.Although mixed-use would be a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the a proposed project,the uses themselves would be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan m and zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the rn SBGPU EIR.The intent of the TD overlay is to allow and encourage an appropriate mix and intensity of land a uses in a compact pattern around the sbX transit station areas, thereby creating a greater level of w connectivity,cohesiveness and community form.Therefore,no significant land use impacts are anticipated. m U c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ° E No Impact. See response to Section 5.4.2(f), above. v v 5.10.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed '0 a Project LL No mitigation measures related to land use and planning were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. r E z 5.11 MINERAL RESOURCES m 5.11.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR a c m As outlined in the SBGPU EIR, while certain areas in the City are known to contain mineral resources, E extraction is not compatible with existing land uses in the City and the City is opposed to the mineral m resource zone designations found in the City for several reasons.Consequently,the SBGPU EIR concluded Q that buildout of the General Plan Update would not create a loss in availability of mineral resources, as Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 87 PacketPg.263 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis existing conditions do not allow for extraction anyway.Therefore,impacts to mineral resources would be less N than significant. 6 Z 5.11.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project m E v c Subslangal New New � Change in Information Mitigation or Q Project or Showing Alternative to m Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor ° 0 Resulting in Significant Significant Technical 0 New Significant Effects than Ellect is Changes or Issues Effects Previous EIR Geclined Additions No Impact E XI. MINERAL RESOURCES.would the project: o a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the X residents of the state? tD v b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X N general plan,specific plan or other c land use Ian? 0 0) d Comments: w a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region a and the residents of the state? m U) No Impact. As shown in Figure NRC-3, Mineral Resource Zones, of the City's General Plan Natural m Resources and Conservation Element,a few of the project's station areas are within Mineral Resource Zone r 2 (MRZ-2)and one or two others are within MRZ-1.The MRZ-1 designation indicates that there is adequate information that no significant mineral deposits are present or likely to be present.The MRZ-2 designation C indicates that either aggregate resources exist on the site, or that there is a high likelihood that such resources exist. v c As stated in the SBGPU EIR, the City further evaluated areas listed by the state as containing regionally significant construction aggregate sectors, as shown in Figure NRC-3, and determined several sectors a (which included the project areas) could not be protected due to incompatible land use and such sectors LL were opposed by the City.The reasons these sectors are opposed by the City include: rapid growth rate(in excess of 25 percent); identification of rare and endangered plant species; traffic and safety concerns; m proximity to highly urbanized areas;inadequate freeway access;and incompatibility with surrounding land Ec uses (lack of a adequate buffer zone). In addition, mining in the project areas would also be incompatible R with the surrounding urban uses, especially the residential uses within and adjacent to the project areas. a Given these factors, mining is not practical in the project's station areas, and no significant impacts to • mineral resources would occur. d E L U t0 Q Page 88 •The Planning Center Janian7 ZOl? Packet Pg. 264 5. Environmental Analysis b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on ° N a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 0 Z No Impact. See response to Section 5.11.2(a), above. d 5.11.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed Project No mitigation measures related to mineral resources were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. a m 0 0 5.12 NOISE v c m 5.12.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR a 0 It was determined by the SBGPU EIR that several noise-related impacts would occur as a result of the 2005 General Plan Update. Firstly, implementation would result in long-term operation-related noise that would o exceed local standards that may have significant noise impacts related to noise sources, which include stationary,roadway,railroad and aircraft.Secondly,implementation of the General Plan Update would create groundborne vibration and groundborne noise that may result in significant vibration impacts from vibration- intensive construction activities and increased train travel along railroads. Thirdly, at the time of the 2005 R General Plan Update there was no adopted Airport Master Plan or Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)for o the San Bernardino International Airport (which was formerly known as the Norton Air Force Base). While .2 awaiting the finalization of these plans,the City of San Bernardino has regulated land uses around the airport /�� '> through the existing noise ordinance(and as predicated on the noise contours from the former Norton AFB). l � W o.r Land uses under the flight path of the airport include noise-sensitive uses, creating an inherent C47 W incompatibility and potentially resulting in exposure of persons to noise levels exceeding standards W established in the General Plan. D a For these three impacts,specifically,the SBGPU EIR analysis determined that stationary noise generated by y the General Plan would potentially be problematic if occurring at the borders between industrial and v commercially-zoned areas and sensitive noise uses. With respect to mobile sources, the SBGPU EIR concluded that increases in noise levels would occur at existing noise-sensitive land uses and would exceed d the City's land use compatibility standards for noise. Buildout of the General Plan Update was also L) determined to have short-and long-term impacts on groundborne vibration and groundborne noise due to a S general increase in rail usage.The SBGPU EIR also concluded that construction activities associated with E buildout of the General Plan would result in temporary noise increases in the vicinity of individual projects. Lastly,the SBGPU EIR concluded that noise incompatibility with the designation of parkland underneath the then-existing airport flight path was anticipated to result in significant noise impacts on this sensitive use. 0 a LL a CD E L U IE Q G v E U ® Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 89 I 5 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis 5.12.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project s N 6 z Substantial New New Change in Information Mitigation or d Project or Showing Alternative to E Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor d Resulting in Significant Significant Technical Q New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact o XII. NOISE.would the project result in: v a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess E of standards established in the local a X 0 general plan or noise ordinance,or m applicable standards of other o agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X LO groundbome vibration or — roundbome noise levels? N c) A substantial permanent increase in o ambient noise levels in the project X vicinity above levels existing without > (� the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in X w the project vicinity above levels Z) existing without the project? CL e) For a project located within an m airport land use plan or,where such 0) a plan has not been adopted,within v two miles of a public airport or X public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? E t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people residing or working X in the project area to excessive ¢ noise levels? ' LL G d Noise is defined as unwanted sound, and is known to have several adverse effects on people, including E hearing loss, speech and sleep interference, physiological responses, and annoyance. Based on these m known adverse effects of noise, the federal government, the State of California, the County of San a Bernardino,and the City of San Bernardino have established criteria to protect public health and safety and to prevent disruption of certain human activities. E U Page 90 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 266 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis Comments: c N r a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the c z local general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? d No Impact.Developments anticipated under the proposed project would adhere to the City's General Plan and the Municipal Code for controlling both temporary and permanent noise and vibration levels.With this consistency, the proposed TD overlay would have no significant impact and no additional mitigation is E required. 0 b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise U levels? E No Impact.As discussed in the SBGPU EIR, significant vibration impacts can potentially be generated by o roadway, railway, and industrial sources. Because the proposed TD overlay is consistent with the City's General Plan and because conforming to the General Plan will result in no sensitive land uses being sited o within critical distancesto vibration sources,any potential for significant vibration impactsfrom transportation sources is less than significant. Further, since vibration generated by machinery at industrial land uses is I* regulated by City's Municipal Code (Section 15.68.20), compliance with the code would result in industrial vibration levels that are considered to be acceptable to the City. As such, no significant vibration impacts N would occur from vibration. o N c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels b existing without the project? �A Minor Technical Changes or Additions. As discussed above, the proposed project has the potential to w reduce transportation-related noise levels within the City. By encouraging an improved mix of land uses a around sbX transit stations and by fostering more efficient transit usage and transportation strategies,the m proposed TD overlay would establish more compact land use patterns and could,as a result,reduce vehicle miles traveled rates and the associated traffic noise within the city. v v= The potential noise effects and changes from the project-related developments would be identified in each project-level environmental analysis (as is required by the General Plan). Minor technical changes or additions may be identified as a result of these specific project-level noise assessments.However,given the 0 overall consistency with the General Plan and with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GP 5.10-1 from E the SBGPU EIR, the proposed project would have no significant impact and no additional mitigation is required. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above a LL levels existing without the project? c m No Impact.Developments anticipated under the proposed project would adhere to the City's General Plan E t and the Municipal Code for controlling temporary and periodic increases in noise levels,including those from @ construction activities.With this consistency,the proposed project would have no significant impact and no Q additional mitigation is required. c 0 E t U m Q \.r Addendum to San Bernardino Genera!Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 91 Packet Pg. 267 5. Environmental Analysis e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, N within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Z c No Impact.The SBGPU EIR discussed the operations at The San Bernardino International Airport(call letters SBD), which is located within the San Bernardino city limits. Airport noise, produced from takeoffs, c flyovers/over-flights,and approaches/landings,contribute to the noise environment within the City.In lieu of E an Airport Master Plan or Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP)for the airport,the General Plan identified an inherent incompatibility with the parkland and operation of the airport,which may result in exposure of a visitors to noise levels that exceed noise compatibility standards established in the General Plan. As a U consequence, Mitigation Measure GP 5.10-4 was instigated (provided at the end of this section). The proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan and with this mitigation measure regarding r noise from the airport.Therefore,the proposed project would have no significant impact and no additional E a mitigation is required. c d f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people residing or p working in the project area to excessive noise levels? LO a No Impact. In addition to aircraft noise from the San Bernardino International Airport, local helicopter air `. traffic from five heliports in San Bernardino was identified in the General Plan Update 2. With respect to N potential noise impacts from private airstrips, the proposed project would be consistent with the City's r General Plan in that individual projects would have to be analyzed on a project-specific basis. Given this •y approach, this impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 5.12.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed m Project w a The following mitigation measures are included in the SBGPU EIR and would apply to development within t7 m the project's station areas. rn v d GP 5.10-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits for any project that involves a noise sensitive use within the 65 dBA CNEL contour along major roadways or freeway, railroads, or the San Bernardino d International Airport,the project property owner/developers shall submit afinal acoustical report v prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.The report shall show that the development will be sound-attenuated against present and projected noise levels,including roadway,aircraft, E helicopter and railroad,to meet City interior and exterior noise standards. w v GP 5.10-4 The City of San Bernardino shall incorporate into the General Plan and Zoning ordinance the a noise contour map developed for the SBIA after completion of the Airport Master Plan. LL 5.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING d E s 5.13.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR m « The SBGPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would allow for substantial population growth through development of additional housing units. Buildout of the General Plan would also result in displacing people and housing, thus necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. E However, the plan provides for infusion of residential uses into existing commercial strips, thus providing 0 zr 2 These heliports included National Orange Show, Red Dog Properties,San Bernardino Community Hospital,SCE Q Eastern Division,and in the Tri-City area. Page 92 •The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g S. Environmental Analysis additional residential opportunities in areas that currently do no allow residential uses. Consequently,the N SBGPU EIR concluded that the General Plan Update would not result in the displacement of a substantial number of people or existing homes and thus impacts were deemed less than significant. o Z C 5.13.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project d E v c d Substantial New New E Change in Information Mitigation or m Project or Showing Alternative to c Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor v Resulting in Significant Significant Technical New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact o XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. would the project: a) Induce substantial population o growth in an area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes X and businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? R b) Displace substantial numbers of o existing housing,necessitating the X 'w construction of replacement housing elsewhere? l c) Displace substantial numbers of people,necessitating the X w construction of replacement o= housing elsewhere? C7 m v Comments: w r a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other 0 infrastructure)? E No Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would not induce substantial population growth in the project area,either directly or indirectly,beyond that considered and approved as a part of the 2005 General 'a Plan Update.With the exception of the allowance of increased building heights(an increase of up to 4 stories a in the Employment Center Station Areas and 5 stories in the Downtown Station Areas)and mixed use(e.g., LL residential over office or commercial,office over commercial) in some station areas,future development of the station areas anticipated under the proposed project would generally occur as permitted under the City's E General Plan.Although mixed-use would be a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the proposed project,the uses themselves would be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the C SBGPU EIR.The proposed project would still allow these same permitted uses to be developed, but in a manner that would permit them to be more closely integrated with each other in a horizontal or vertical E manner. Because the allowable residential density would be the same as for the underlying base zone and the floor area ratio for commercial would also remain the same as existing,the number of residential units w and nonresidential square footage would not increase under the proposed project; these would occur in Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 93 Packet Pg. 269 5. Environmental Analysis accordance with those considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. N Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. T 6 Z b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? E No Impact.As with the General Plan Update, implementation of the proposed project would not displace E existing housing or people in the station areas associated with the proposed project. Future development Q anticipated under the proposed project would occur within the same project area boundaries considered in i the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. Therefore, no significant impacts would v occur. d c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing E elsewhere? ° m No Impact. See response to Section 5.13.2(b). o 5.13.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed Ln Project r- E7 No mitigation measures related to population and housing were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. o N 5.14 PUBLIC SERVICES > 5.14.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR m w As outlined in the SBGPU EIR, buildout of the General Plan Update would result in an increase in residents a and workers in the City,which may result in an increased demand forfire protection services,resulting in the m need for additional fire protection facilities and personnel. The SBGPU EIR found that if additional fire and U) emergency medical services facilities and personnel are not added to accommodate the increase service m demand brought about by the development of the project area, a pattern of overstressed resources and decreased levels of service to the overall community would evolve. Buildout in accordance with the San u Bernardino General Plan would also result in an increase in demand for police protection services within the ° City. As a result of an increase in demand due to future growth within the City, the SBGPU EIR found that new police facilities, equipment and personnel may be necessary to maintain adequate level of service for 3 the City. However, the SBGPU EIR concluded that existing regulations and standards conditions are c sufficient to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Q Buildout of the General Plan Update would generate a significant number of additional elementary,middle, LL and high school students that would impact the school enrollment capacities of the City of San Bernardino Unified School District (SBUSD). Growth in the student population in the City would necessitate additional E school facilities and personnel within SBUSD and several other neighboring districts.Additionally,buildout in E accordance with the General Plan Update would result in the need for an additional 202,862 volumes of books to support future library needs of the City's population. However, upon implementation of General a Plan policies, regulatory requirements, and standard of conditions of approval, impacts to schools and libraries were found to be less than significant. E E U R t+' Q Page 94 •The Planning Center January 2012 Pac'_ ,70e� 5. Environmental Analysis 5.14.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project ° N O Z Substantial New New C Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to E E Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Resulting in New Significant Significant Technical E Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Q Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact v 0 XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES.Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision U of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, E response times or other performanc e objectives for any of the public services: o a) Fire protection? X d b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Parks? X e) Other public facilities? X N G O .y Comments: a) Fire protection? � 0: M No Impact.Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly impact fire and police protection a and services or library service and facilities.The proposed project would not introduce a greater number of c7 residential and nonresidential uses than those considered as a part of the 2005 General Plan Update and m N analyzed in the SBGPU EIR.With the exception of the allowance of increased building heights(an increase of up to 4 stories in the Employment Center Station Areas and 5 stories in the Downtown Station Areas)and L LD mixed use(e.g., residential over office or commercial,office over commercial) in some station areas,future development of the station areas anticipated under the proposed project would generally occur as permitted U under the City's General Plan. Additionally, as with development associated with the 2005 General Plan .8 Update,future development anticipated under the proposed project would be assessed Development Impact E Fees for fire protection (Section 3.27.040[Fire Suppression Facilities,Vehicles,and Equipment Impact Fee— c Findings]),law enforcement(Section 3.27.030[Law Enforcement Facilities,Vehicles,and Equipment Impact Fee — Findings]), and library facilities (Section 3.27.080 [Library Facility and Collection Impact Fee — a Findings]) as outlined in the City's Municipal Code. Such fees would help to reduce impacts to fire and police protection and library services.Development anticipated under the proposed project is also required LL to comply with the most current adopted fire codes, building codes,and nationally recognized fire and life safety standards of the City and the San Bernardino City Fire Department.Therefore,no significant impacts E to fire, police, and library services would occur. @ b) Police protection? a c m No Impact. See response to Section 5.14.2(a), above. E t U m Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Page 95 Packet Pg.271 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis 0 c) Schools? N No Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly impact school services and z facilities.The proposed project would not introduce a greater number of residential and nonresidential uses than those considered as a part of the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. Additionally, the need for additional school services is addressed by compliance with school impact assessment fees per Senate Bill 50 (SB 50).Therefore,to address the increase in enrollment at the school district schools, as with development associated with the 2005 General Plan Update, project applicants of future development anticipated under the proposed project would be required to pay school impact fees to 0a reduce any impacts to the school system, in accordance with SB 50. These fees are collected by school 0 districts at the time of issuance of building permits.As stated in Government Code Section 65995(h), "The payment or satisfaction of a fee,charge,or other requirement levied or imposed ...are hereby deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act,or both, involving, but not E limited to,the planning,use,or development of real property,or any change in governmental organization or o reorganization...on the provision of adequate school facilities."Payment of these fees would offset impacts from increased demand for school services associated with future development anticipated under the o proposed project by providing an adequate financial base to construct and equip new and existing schools. Therefore, no significant impacts to school services would occur. N d) Parks? N c No Impact. Refer to the analysis in Section 5.15,Recreation, below. N d e) Other public facilities? o: No Impact. See response to Section 5.14.2(a), above. w a 5.14.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed m Project rn m No mitigation measures related to public services were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. r d 5.15 RECREATION U 0 5.15.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR E v As stated in the SBGPU EIR, buildout of the General Plan Update would generate additional residents that would increase the use of existing park and recreational facilities and would result in environmental impacts C to expand recreational facilities. However, as concluded in the SBGPU EIR,with adherence of the existing u_ regulations and polices of the General Plan Update, impacts were determined to be less than significant. c m E t U R M Q d E s U © a Page 96 The Planning Center January 2012 v packetPg. 272 5. Environmental Analysis 5.15.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project ° N 1 O Z Substantial New New Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to E E Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor c Resulting in New Significant Significant Technical E Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact w 0 XV. RECREATION. v a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and E regional packs or other recreational X o facilities such that substantial m physical deterioration of the facility d would occur or be accelerated? o b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the N construction or expansion of X recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on a C the environment? °_ N !Y Comments: w a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other a recreational facilities,such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 00 v No Impact. The proposed project would not introduce a greater number of residential and nonresidential w w uses or recreational facilities than those considered as a part of the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed w in the SBGPU EIR; therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not increase the use of parks U and recreation facilities or developed recreational facilities beyond those already anticipated.Additionally,as ° with development associated with the 2005 General Plan Update,future residential development anticipated E under the proposed project would be assessed Development Impact Fees for parks and recreation facilities, c as outlined in Sections 3.27.070(Quimby Act Parkland and Open Space Acquisition and Park Improvement v Impact Fee-Findings)and 3.27.075(AB 1600 Parkland and Open Space Acquisition and Park Improvement a Impact Fee-Findings) of the City's Municipal Code. Such fees would help to reduce impacts to parks and recreation facilities. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. u_ c m b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of E recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? m No Impact. See response to Section 5.15.2(a), above. 4 c 5.15.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed E Project v w 1r No mitigation measures related to recreation were outlined in the SBGPU EIR. Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 97 5. Environmental Analysis T 5.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC N T 5.16.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR Z c As stated in the SBGPU EIR,trip generation at buildout of the General Plan Update would impact levels of m service for the existing area roadway system. Additionally, General Plan related trip generation in combination with existing and proposed cumulative development would result in designated intersections, road and/or highways exceeding county congestion management agency service standards.As concluded E E in the SBGPU EIR, even with implementation of mitigation, impacts would remain significant and (D unavoidable. o U With respect to air traffic patterns, proposed circulation improvements, and parking, the SBGPU EIR m determined that no impacts would occur. E 0. 0 5.16.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project m 0 Substantial New New Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to N Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor r Resulting in Significant Significant Technical 2 New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Ln Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact K XVI.TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC.would the project: a: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, w ordinance or policy establishing (L measures of effectiveness for the O performance of the circulation ca system,taking into account all v modes of transportation including m mass transit and non-motorized X travel and relevant components of U the circulation system,including but not limited to intersections,streets, highways and freeways,pedestrian E 0 and bicycle paths,and mass � transit? v b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, a including, but not limited to level of LL service standards and travel X c demand measures,or other w standards established by the county E congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Q c) Result in a change in air traffic pattems,including either an c v increase in traffic levels or a change X E in location that results in substantial L safety risks? r Y Q Page 98 •The Planning Center January 2012 5. Environmental Analysis Substantial New New ° Change m Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to 6 Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Z Resulting in Significant Significant Technical v New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact6 d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g.,sharp a curves or dangerous intersections) X or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm 0 equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency X access? E f) Conflict with adopted policies, o plans,or programs regarding public transit,bicycle,or pedestrian X o facilities,or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? v� N Comments: r 0 Vi a) Conflict with an applicable plan,ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for d the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system,including but not limited to intersections,streets,highways and freeways,pedestrian and w bicycle paths, and mass transit? CL CO No Impact.Although the character of some of the station areas may be designed and developed in a more U) transit-oriented manner than anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, implementation of the d proposed project would not lead to a significant impact on the City's circulation or transportation system, r including non-motorized transportation systems and roadways and highways designated under a congestion U management program. Even with the introduction of mixed use, vehicles miles traveled and development 0 intensity would not increase under the proposed project. Additionally, the TD and associated zoning E regulations,development standards,and design guidelines would encourage a mix and intensity of land use v around sbX transit stations that would foster transit-usage and encourage walking/biking and would r m implement the land use and transportation strategies of the City's General Plan.The project would establish 0 v more compact land use patterns to facilitate shorter travel distances and alternative travel modes. The 4 project would also reduce commute distances by providing housing close to transit. LL c Additionally, future development associated with the proposed project would create station area communities that would provide for a mix of commercial, office, residential, recreation, and other support uses. The location, design, and layout of these various land uses would provide a unique and walkable ? shopping,working,and living experience for residents of the station areas,thereby minimizing the number of a vehicles on the City's roadway system and also minimizing the dependency on vehicles. As with development associated with the 2005 General Plan Update, future development anticipated under the proposed project would be assessed Development Impact Fees for the local and regional circulation E systems,as stipulated in Sections 3.27.050(Local Circulation System Impact Fee-Findings)and 3.27.060 R (Regional Circulation System Impact Fee - Findings) of the City's Municipal Code. Furthermore, as with a development anticipated under the General Plan Update, most project-related development projects Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 99 PacketPg.275 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis (including mixed use)would require a project-level environmental analysis at the time development plans are ° N submitted to the City. As a part of the environmental review, a project-specific traffic analysis for most projects would also be required. Finally,future development projects anticipated underthe proposed project 6 would be required to adhere to the mitigation measures outlined in the SBGPU EIR,which are reproduced at the end of this section. Therefore, significant impacts would not occur. d E -o b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program,including,but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? v v 0 No Impact. See response to Section 5.16.2(a), above. w c m c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in a location that results in substantial safety risks? v No Impact.As shown in Figure LU-4, San Bernardino International Airport Planning Boundaries, not of the p station areas associated with the proposed project are within the airport influence area or in any of the airport's runway protection, safety, or traffic pattern zones. Additionally, the proposed project would not le change the project area boundaries that were analyzed in the SBGPU EIR forthe 2005 General Plan Update. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. c d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous y intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,farm equipment)? No Impact.Future development in accordance with the proposed project would not increase hazards due to a a design feature or incompatible land use, or result in inadequate emergency access. The City of San w Bernardino, San Bernardino City Fire Department (SBCFD) and Caltrans have adopted roadway design a standards that would preclude the construction of any unsafe design features. As with development m anticipated under the General Plan Update, future development in accordance with the propose project rn (including roadways, alleys, access drives and drive aisles) would be required to comply with the City, m SBCFD and Caltrans standards for design, sight lines, access, speeds, and emergency access. These design standards are imposed on project developments by the City and SBCFD during the building plan m check and development review process.Compliance with these established design standards would ensure v that hazards due to design features would not occur and that adequate emergency access is provided. Additionally, individual development projects would be required to incorporate all applicable design and E E safety requirements as set forth in the most current adopted fire codes, building codes, and nationally a recognized fire and life safety standards of the City and SBCFD.Furthermore,during the building plan check and development review process,the City would coordinate with SBCFD to ensure that adequate circulation a and access is provided within the traffic and circulation components of each development project.Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. LL m e) Result in inadequate emergency access? E U A No Impact. See response to Section 5.16.2(a), above. a f) Conflict with adopted policies,plans,or programs regarding public transit,bicycle,or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? E m No Impact. As with development anticipated under the 2005 General Plan Update, future development a associated with the proposed project would not conflict with adopted policies,plans or programs regarding Page 100 •The Planning Center January 2012 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis T alternative modes of transportation. Development in the project's station areas would be more than ° adequately served by existing and future bus stops as the project would occur along the 15.7-mile corridor that makes up the sbX E Street Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project (sbX BRT Project). In fact, future z development in accordance with the proposed project would help implement the sbX BRT Project by allowing transit-oriented development(TOD)to occur adjacent to and near the 13 sbX stations that would de developed along the 15-mile corridor.The potential for TOD at sbX station areas draws on TOD principles E that focus on compact growth,a mix of land uses,and pedestrian-oriented design within walking distance of a transit station. Future development associated with the proposed project would create station area E communities that would provide for a mix of commercial, office, residential, recreation, and other support uses. The location, design, and layout of these various land uses would provide a unique and walkable o shopping,working,and living experience for residents of the station areas,thereby creating a greater level of U connectivity and minimizing the dependency on vehicles. Additionally, the TD and associated zoning r N regulations,development standards,and design guidelines would encourage a mix and intensity of land use E around sbX transit stations that would foster transit-usage and encourage walking/biking and would o implement the land use and transportation strategies of the City's General Plan.The project would establish more compact land use patterns to facilitate shorter travel distances and alternative travel modes.Therefore, o no significant impact on alternative transportation would occur. v 5.16.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR The following mitigation measures are included in the SBGPU EIR and would apply to development within C the project's station areas. .y GP 5.14-1 Prior to adoption of the General Plan Update the City of San Bernardino shall add the following ` . recommendations to the Circulation Element of the General Plan Update: w • Signalize the intersection of Meridian Avenue @ Rialto Avenue. With signalization and a permitted phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A during both peak hours. m m • Signalize the intersection of Hunts Lane @ E Street. With signalization and protected phasing,and the addition of one NB left-turn lane the intersection will operate at LOS B and E C during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. d U • Add an additional westbound right-turn lane at the intersection of Waterman Avenue @ 30th ° Street.With one additional WB right-turn lane the intersection will operate at LOS D and C E during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. m a • Add an additional northbound right-turn lane at the intersection of Waterman Avenue @ SR- 4 30 EB Ramps.With one additional NB right-turn lane and one additional EB left-turn lane the intersection will operate at LOS D during both peak hours. r c m • Signalize the intersection of SR-30 WB Off-ramp @ 30th Street. With signalization and E protected phasing,the intersection will operate at LOS C during both peak hours. Q • Signalize the intersection of Harrison Street @ 40th Street.With signalization and permitted phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A and C during the AM and PM peak hours, r respectively. E U t6 Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 101 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis • Signalize the intersection of Waterman Avenue @ 36th Street. With signalization and N permitted phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A and B during the AM and PM peak r hours, respectively. z c • Signalize the intersection of Waterman Avenue @ 34th Street. With signalization and permitted phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A during both peak hours. d • Signalize the intersection of Valencia Avenue @ 40th Street. With signalization and a permitted phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A during both peak periods. � 0 • Add an additional westbound right-turn lane at the intersection of Del Rosa Avenue @ SR-30 WB Ramps. With one additional WB right-turn lane the intersection will operate at LOS B E and C during AM and PM peak hours, respectively. 0 0 • Signalize the intersection of Tippecanoe Avenue @ Rialto Avenue.With signalization and d permitted phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A and B during AM and PM peak o hours, respectively. • Signalize and add one northbound exclusive left-turn lane and one exclusive northbound 77- lane at the intersection of Rancho Avenue @ 5th Street/Foothill Road. With r, signalization and E/W protective phasing,N/S split phasing,one NB exclusive left-turn lane o and one NB exclusive right-turn lane the intersection will operate at C and D during AM and w PM peak hours, respectively. • Signalize and add one additional through lane in each direction at the intersection of Mount View Avenue @ San Bernardino Road. With signalization, protective phasing and one w exclusive left,thru and right-turn lane in each direction, and EB right turn overlap phasing a- the intersection will operate at LOS C and D during AM and PM peak hours, respectively. m rn GP 5.14-2 The City of San Bernardino shall cooperate with regional transportation agencies toward m mitigating impacts to regional transportation facilities by measures such as securing fair share r contributions from future projects impacting mainline freeway segments.Mitigation of impacts to d regional transportation facilities would require the following improvements: o E • 1-10 EB from Jct. 1-21 to Waterman Avenue, add 2 lanes. c m 1-10 WB from Jct. 1-21 to Waterman Avenue, add 1 lane. a • 1-10 EB and WB from Waterman Avenue to Tippecanoe Avenue,add 2 lanes each direction. c 1-10 EB and WB from Tippecanoe to Mountain View, add two lanes each direction. E U • SR 30 EB from Highland Avenue to Jct. 1-215, add two lanes. w a • SR 30 WB from Highland Avenue to Jct. 1-215, add one lane. m • SR 30 EB and WB from Jet. 1-215 to H Street, add one lane each direction. E m © • SR 30 EB and WB from H Street to SR 259 add one lane each direction. a Page 102 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 278 S.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis SR 30 EB from SR 259 to Waterman Avenue, add one lane. ° N r • 1-215 NB and SB from Jct. 1-10 to Orange Show Road, add one lane. 6 c • 1-215 NB from Jct. SR 66 to Baseline Street, add three lanes. E 'a • 1-215 SB from Jct. SR 66 to Baseline Street, add two lanes. m E Q 1-215 NB and' SB from Jct. SR 66 to University Parkway, add one lane. d 0 0 5.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS U c m 5.17.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the SBGPU EIR E 0. 0 According to the SBGPU EIR, upgrades to the existing water supply and delivery systems would be required d to adequately serve future growth in accordance with the General Plan buildout. Additionally, protect- p generated wastewater could not be adequately treated by the wastewater service provider for the project. However,as concluded in the SBGPU EIR,with adherence to existing regulations and implementation of the a policies outlined in the General Plan Update, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. N As also concluded in the SBGPU EIR, existing and/or proposed facilities would be able to accommodate c project-related sold waste and project-related development would comply with related solid waste .0 regulations). Additionally, existing and/or proposed facilities would be able to accommodate project- tvi d generated dry utility demands, but geothermal resources used for energy may be affected by buildout of the l IV, General Plan Update.However,as concluded in the SBGPU EIR,with adherence to existing regulations and C47 W implementation of the policies outlined in the General Plan Update, impacts would be reduced to less than w significant. a t7 5.17.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project w 'a W w Substantial New New a� Change in Information Mitigation or U Project or Showing Alternative to Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor E Resulting in Significant Significant Technical 13 New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or d Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. would the project: a a) Exceed waste water treatment LL requirements of the applicable X Regional Water Quality Control E Board? L v b) Require or result in the construction of new water or waste water Q treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction X uc of which could cause significant E environmental effects? u m Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 103 6.E.g S. Environmental Analysis Substantial New New 0 N Change m Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to G Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor Z Resulting in Significant Significant Technical m New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact c c) Require or result in the construction E of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing X facilities,the construction of which 0 could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies E available to serve the project from o CL existing entitlements and resources X or are new or expanded entitlements o needed? e) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity X N to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's 0 existing commitments? > f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid X w waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal,state,and local 0. statutes and regulations related to X m solid waste? y 2V d w Comments: v 0 a) Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control E Board? ' v c m No Impact. As concluded in the SBGPUEIR (which included development of the project's station areas), additional facilities would need to be built or expansion of existing facilities would need to be completed to Q accommodate the proposed General Plan Update buildout (which includes development in the project's r station areas)in the service area of the San Bernardino Water Reclamation Plant(WRP).Since the City is the largest contributor of wastewater flows to the WRP,the increase in population from buildout of the General Plan Update alone would most likely exceed design capacity of both facilities.Although the character of the station areas would change and mixed uses would be introduced under the proposed project, the uses themselves would not be new as they are already permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning a designations.Therefore,the proposed project's impacts to wastewater treatment would be similar to those of the General Plan Update buildout.However,as outlined in the SBGPUEIR,with implementation of Mitigation E Measures 5.15-2(which is reproduced at the end of this section), impacts would be reduced to a less than s significant level. Additionally, as discussed in Section 5.9.2(a), individual project applicants would be m required to prepare and implement a SWPPP pursuant to the GCP. The SWPPP would specify BMPs the project applicant would implementfor protecting water quality by eliminating and/or minimizing stormwater Page 104 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 280 5. Environmental Analysis pollution prior to and during grading and construction and show the placement of those BMPs.Therefore,no ° N significant impacts would occur. 0 b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion Z of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? E 'a No Impact.Although the character of the station areas would change and mixed uses would be introduced under the proposed project,the uses themselves would not be new as they are already permitted under the E existing General Plan and zoning designations. Therefore, the proposed project's impacts to water and m wastewater treatment would be similar to those of the General Plan Update buildout.Additionally,during the o City's development review process, individual project applicants would be required to comply with the v requirements in effect at the time building permits are issued, including payment of the required sewer m connection fees,as outlined in Section 13.08.050(Fees Accompanying Application)of the City's Municipal E Code. As stated in Section 13.08.050, these fees are deposited in a special account and used for the o construction of sewer trunk lines and collection facilities and for the construction and improvement of waste water treatment plants. Furthermore, as outlined in Section 13.08.090 (Compliance with City Engineer's o Specifications)of the City's Municipal Code,all installations of sewer laterals are required to comply with the provisions and requirements of the current standard specifications of the City on file in the office of the City Engineer.Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. N c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of � existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? -° N No Impact. Future development associated with the proposed project would not require or result in the �..� construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities beyond those already considered under the General Plan Update.Although the character of the station areas would change and w mixed uses would be introduced under the proposed project,the uses themselves would not be new as they are already permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations.As a standard requirement of 0 all new developments, project applicants are required to submit for review and approval by the City CO comprehensive grading and drainage plans and a hydrology study for construction projects.The plans and study are required to demonstrate how surface water will be collected onsite and conveyed to existing storm E drain facilities. Additionally, as with development associated with the 2005 General Plan Update, future m development anticipated under the proposed project would be assessed Development Impact Fees for v storm drains as in Section 3.27.105(Storm Drain Development Impact Fee-Findings)of the City's Municipal Code.Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. E v c d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and a resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? a No Impact. As concluded in the SBGPUEIR, buildout of the General Plan Update (which included development of the project's station areas) would impact water supplies. Although the character of the m station areas would change and mixed uses would be introduced under the proposed project, the uses E themselves would not be new as they are already permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations.Therefore,the proposed project's impacts to water supplies would be similar to those of the 4 General Plan Update buildout. However, as outlined in the SBGPUEIR, with implementation of Mitigation Measures 5.15-1 (which is reproduced at the end of this section), impacts would be reduced to a less than m significant level. Additionally, as with development anticipated under the General Plan Update, future E development associated with the proposed project would have to adhere to the provisions of the City's Water u Wise Landscape Program (Chapter 17.06 of the City's Municipal Code).Additionally,future development in ^° the project's station areas would also have to adhere to the development standards and guidelines outlined Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 105 PacketPg. 281 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis in the proposed TD zoning regulations (see Appendix A). For example, one of the guidelines outlined in N Section 19.19A.150(Landscape Design)includes the use native and drought tolerant plant materials.Finally, individual development projects would be required to complywith the provisions of the 2010 Green Building 6 Standards Code, which contains requirements for indoor water use reduction and site irrigation conservation. Therefore, no significant impact on water supplies would occur. E -0 e) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider,which serves or may serve the E project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the ¢ provider's existing commitments? 0 No Impact. See response to Section 5.17.2(a), above. w c m Q Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste E CL disposal needs? 0 m No Impact. Future development associated with the proposed project would be served by landfills with o sufficient permitted capacity. Although the character of the station areas would change and mixed uses would be introduced under the proposed project,the uses themselves would not be new as they are already aLO permitted under the existing General Plan and zoning designations. Therefore,the amount of solid waste generated by future development associated with the proposed project would be similar to that of N development anticipated under the General Plan Update. As concluded in the SBGPUEIR, local landfills o would be able to handle the amount of refuse from San Bernardino and other surrounding communities for .2 some time and legislative requirements (e.g.,Assembly Bill 939 [AB 939])are in place for planning of new > d landfills in advance of closure of existing landfills. In addition, the City of San Bernardino Refuse and Recycling Division is continuing to participate and maintain AB 939 goals and guidelines. For example,the of Refuse and Recycling Division would continue to provide curbside recycling and green waste pickup for both W commercial and household materials.Continuation of the recycling program and education on composting a efforts would result in achieving the desired goal of 50 percent waste diversion in compliance with the Assembly Bill 939. Implementation of the proposed project would not hinder efforts to achieving this ami requirement as educational material on reducing waste, recycling and composting would be provided to a commercial and residential users.Furthermore,future development projects associated with the proposed project would be required to comply with the provisions of the 2010 Green Building Standards Code,which d outlines requirements for construction waste reduction, material selection, and natural resource L) 0 conservation.Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? m a No Impact. See response to Section 5.17-2(f), above. O LL 5.17.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed Project E The following mitigation measures are included in the SBGPU EIR and would apply to development within the project's station areas. a GP 5.15-1 In accordance with the State Water Code (Section 10610-10645), the City shall maintain an v updated Urban Water Management Plan (Water System Management Plan) which describes E s and evaluates sources of supply, reasonable and practical efficient uses, reclamation and ,0, demand management activities, necessary to adequately serve future growth pursuant to the C City's General Plan. Page 106 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 282 S. Environmental Analysis GP 5.15-2 The City of San Bernardino shall update the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan to reflect ° General Plan Update build-out statistics,review treatment facility capacity periodically and adjust Sewer Capacity Fees when appropriate in consultation with participating communities to z accommodate construction of new or expanded wastewater treatment and collection facilities. C d 5.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE E c m 5.18.1 Summary of Impacts Identified in the Certified EIR E d According to the SBGPU EIR, based on the substantiations provided in the SBGPU EIR and with c implementation of the mitigation measures identified therein,the City found that the General Plan Update U would have a significant adverse effect on the environment, either individually or cumulatively, directly or r indirectly with regards to Air Quality, Noise and Transportation/Traffic. E CL 0 5.18.2 Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project d 0 Substantial New New � Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor w c Resulting in Significant Significant Technical o New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact �! XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential w to degrade the quality of the Z) environment,substantially reduce a the habitat of a fish or wildlife m species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal X r d community,reduce the number or c) restrict the range of a rare or 0 endangered plant or animal or E eliminate important examples of the v' major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? 0 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but ' LL cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" d means that the incremental effects X E of a project are considerable when m viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects 4 of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects.) d E r U t9 ® Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 107 6.E.g 5. Environmental Analysis Substantial New New 0 N Change in Information Mitigation or Project or Showing Alternative to G Circumstances Greater Reduce Minor ? Resulting in Significant Significant Technical d New Significant Effects than Effect is Changes or E Issues Effects Previous EIR Declined Additions No Impact c) Does the project have E environmental effects which will Q cause substantial adverse effects X d v on human beings,either directly or indirectly? U c m E a Comments: 0 w d a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce o the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict LO the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major I periods of California history or prehistory? r c 0 No Impact.As with development anticipated under the General Plan Update,future development associated w with the proposed project is not expected to reduce the habitat of fish and wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or eliminate examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. w IL IL b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? m ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable y when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, d and the effects of probable future projects.) r m No Impact. Although mixed-use would be a new land use introduced into certain station areas under the c proposed project,the uses themselves would be similar to those permitted under the existing General Plan E and zoning designations and were already considered in the 2005 General Plan Update and analyzed in the SBGPU EIR. As with development anticipated under the General Plan Update, future development associated with the proposed project would be consistent with the long-term goals of developing the s project's station areas with a mix of uses in accordance with the City's General Plan.Therefore,the proposed project would not weight short-term goals above long-term environmental goals of the City.Additionally,the LL issues relevant to the proposed project are very localized and confined to the immediate project area.The development of the TD zoning regulations,introduction of mixed-use,and new information available for the proposed project would not result in impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. Cumulative impacts of the proposed project would not be greater than those determined by the SBGPU OR m for the station areas associated with the proposed project. Q c c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? E E U m No Impact.This Addendum reviewed the proposed project's potential impacts to air quality,greenhouse gas Q emissions, noise, traffic, and other environmental issues. As explained herein, the mitigation measures Page 108 •The Planning Center January 2012 Pan.. 5. Environmental Analysis contained in the SGBPU EIR and reproduced in this Addendum would remain sufficient to ensure that all ° impacts remain less than significant and no new significant impacts would occur.Therefore,the proposed project's impacts to human beings,either directly or indirectly,would not be greater than those determined 6 z by the SBGPU EIR. Z m E v C d E Q d 0 O U c m E a 0 m m 0 e N C O N � N a m m r m U 0 E 0 c m v LL C y E t U 10 a d E U U A a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 109 Packet Pg.285 6:E;g 5. Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank. 0 N 0 z Y c m E v c v E ¢ d 0 0 U C N E Q O d d LO N r N C O N d tY tY W 7 IL 0 m N v d w r U 0 E c d v v LL Y C d E L U W Q i+ C d E L U A Q Page 110 •The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 286 6.E.g 0 N O 2 6. Summary Table of Mitigation Measures E Table 7 below provides the mitigation measure, the responsible party and time frame for implementation, and the monitoring agency. d 0 0 Table 7 d Summary of Mitigation Measures E Responsible Time Monitoring 0 Mitigation Measure Party Frame Party > v Air Quality o GP 5.2-2A Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the property Property Prior to issuance of City of San owner/developer shall include a note on all grading Owner/Developer, grading permits Bernardino plans which requires the construction contractor to Construction implement following measures during grading.These Contractor measures shall also be discussed at the pregrade conference. g • Use low emission mobile construction equipment. Ln • Maintain construction equipment engines by aa) keeping them tuned. x cc • Utilize existing power sources(i.e.,power poles) �� Ix when feasible. w • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic a interference. 0 • Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes. ca U) When feasible,construction should be planned so 0 that lane closures on existing streets are kept to a c minimum. r • Schedule construction operations affecting traffic U for off-peak hours to minimize traffic congestion. 0 • Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities(the plan E may include advance public notice of routing,use of public transportation and satellite parking areas 0 v with a shuttle service). 'o GP 5.2-213 The City shall promote the use of low or zero VOC City of San Ongoing City of San a content architectural coatings for construction and Bernardino Bernardino LL maintenance activities. Cultural Resources E E GP 5.4-1 In areas of documented or inferred historic resource Property In conjunction with City of San r U presence,City staff shall require applicants for Owner/Developer, submittal of Bernardino development permits to provide studies to document Historical development the presence/absence of historical resources.On Preservation permits properties where historic structures or resources are Expert m identified,such studies shall provide a detailed £c mitigation plan,including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan,based on the recommendations of a qualified historical Q reservation expert. Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 111 PacketPg. 287 B.E.g 6. Summary Table of Mitigation Measures Table 7 N Summary of Mitigation Measures Responsible Time Monitoring Z Mitigation Measure Party Frame Party GP 5.4-2 In areas of documented or inferred archeological Property In conjunction with City of San and/or paleontological resource presence,City staff Owner/Developer, submittal of Bernardino shall require applicants for development permits to Guttural development provide studies to document the presence/absence of Preservation permits such resources.On properties where resources are Expert identified,such studies shall provide a detailed 0 mitigation plan,including a monitoring program and v recovery and/or in situ preservation plan,based on the recommendations of a qualified cultural reservation expert. a GP 5.4-3 In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition Property During County Coroner, ° of any human remains in any location other than a Owner/Developer, gradingiconstruction Native American v dedicated cemetery,the following steps shall be Construction Heritage ❑ taken: Contractor Commission v There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the she or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the San Bernardino County Coroner is contacted to determine o if the remains are prehistoric and that no investigation N of the cause of death is required.If the coroner a' determines the remains to be Native American,then the coroner shall contact the Native American rr Heritage Commission with in 24 hours,and the w Native American Heritage Commission shall identify D the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendent from the deceased Native American.The co most likely descendant may make recommendations v to the landowner or the person responsible for the m excavation work,for means of treating or disposing r of,with appropriate dignity,the human remains and v any associated grave goods as provided in Public o Resources Code Section 5097.98;or E Where the following conditions occur,the landowner a or his authorized representative shall rebury the � Native American human remains and associated v grave goods with appropriate dignity either in Q accordance with the recommendation of the most ri likely descendant or on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbances: E S The Native American Heritage Commission is @ unable to identify a most likely descendant or the 4 likely descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the commission;or E . The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation;or ® . The landowner or his authorized representative a rejects the recommendation of the descendant, Page 112 •The Planning Center January 2012 PacketPg. 288 i 6. Summary Table of Mitigation Measures Table 7 ° N Summary of Miti ation Measures Responsible Time Monitoring Z Mitigation Measure Party Frame Party and the mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. m Noise Q GP 5.10-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits for any Property Prior to issuance of City of San a) project that involves a noise sensitive use within the Owner/Developer building permits Bernardino, 0 65 dBA CNEL contour along major roadways or Planning freeway,railroads,or the San Bernardino International Director r v Airport,the project property owner/developers shall E submit a final acoustical report prepared to the o satisfaction of the Planning Director.The report shall m show that the development will be sound-attenuated d against present and projected noise levels,including roadway,aircraft,helicopter and railroad,to meet City interior and exterior noise standards. Transportation and Traffic GP 5.14-1 Prior to adoption of the General Plan Update the City City of San Prior to adoption of City of San N of San Bernardino shall add the following Bernardino the General Plan Bernardino 0 recommendations to the Circulation Element of the Update .N General Plan Update: —, > Signalize the intersection of Meridian Avenue @ Rialto Avenue.With signalization and permitted i W phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A Z) during both peak hours. a Signalize the intersection of Hunts Lane @ E m Street.With signalization and protected phasing, y and the addition of one NB left-tum lane the m intersection will operate at LOS B and C during the AM and PM peak hours,respectively. d • Add an additional westbound right-turn lane at the intersection of Waterman Avenue @ 30th Street. .° With one additional WB right-tum lane the E intersection will operate at LOS D and C during the AM and PM peak hours,respectively. d • Add an additional northbound right-tum lane at the 4 intersection of Waterman Avenue @ SR-30 EB Ramps.With one additional NB right-tum lane and u one additional EB left-tum lane the intersection will operate at LOS D during both peak hours. a) E • Signalize the intersection of SR-30 WB Off-ramp @ 30th Street.With signalization and protected U phasing,the intersection will operate at LOS C Q during both peak hours. • Signalize the intersection of Harrison Street @ a0 40th Street.With signalization and permitted E phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A and o C during the AM and PM peak hours,respectively. w �� Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 113 6.E.g 6. Summary Table of Mitigation Measures Table 7 N Summary of Mitigation Measures Responsible Time Monitoring z Mitigation Measure Party Frame Party • Signalize the intersection of Waterman Avenue @ E 36th Street.With signalization and permitted � phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A and B during the AM and PM peak hours,respectively. E • Signalize the intersection of Waterman Avenue @ m 34th Street.With signalization and permitted o phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A during both peak hours. • Signalize the intersection of Valencia Avenue @ E 40th Street.With signalization and permitted o phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A d during both peak periods. d • Add an additional westbound right-turn lane at the intersection of Del Rasa Avenue @ SR-30 WB Ramps.With one additional WB right-turn lane the u intersection will operate at LOS B and C during AM and PM peak hours,respectively. • Signalize the intersection of Tippecanoe Avenue @ c Rialto Avenue.With signalization and permitted '0 phasing the intersection will operate at LOS A and 5 B during AM and PM peak hours,respectively. • Signalize and add one northbound exclusive left- turn lane and one exclusive northbound right-tum w lane at the intersection of Rancho Avenue @ 5th =a StreeVFoothill Road.With signalization and E/W t7 protective phasing,WS split phasing,one NB exclusive left-turn lane and one NB exclusive right- turn lane the intersection will operate at C and D d during AM and PM peak hours,respectively. r • Signalize and add one additional through lane in each direction at the intersection of Mount View 0 0 Avenue @ San Bernardino Road.With signalization,protective phasing and one exclusive E left,thm and right-turn lane in each direction,and c EB right fora overlap phasing the intersection will � operate at LOS C and D during AM and PM peak Q hours,respectively. GP 5.14-2 The City of San Bernardino shall cooperate with City of San Ongoing City of San LL regional transportation agencies toward mitigating Bernardino, Bernardino r impacts to regional transportation facilities by Regional E measures such as securing fair share contributions Transportation from future projects impacting mainline freeway Agencies @ segments.Mitigation of impacts to regional transportation facilities would require the following improvements: m E 1 • 1-10 EB from Jct.1-21 to Waterman Avenue,add 2 m lanes. a i Page 114 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg.290 6. Summary Table of Mitigation Measures �. Table 7 o N Summary of Miti ation Measures Responsible Time Monitoring z Mitigation Measure Party Frame Party . 1-10 WB from Jct.1-21 to Waterman Avenue,add 1 E E lane. ° c • 1-10 EB and WB from Waterman Avenue to E Tippecanoe Avenue,add 2 lanes each direction. a . 1-10 EB and WB from Tippecanoe to Mountain View,add two lanes each direction. v • SR 30 EB from Highland Avenue to Jct.1-215,add two lanes. d • SR 30 WB from Highland Avenue to Jct.1-215,add a one lane. ° . SR 30 EB and WB from Jct.1-215 to H Street,add m one lane each direction. o • SR 30 EB and WB from H Street to SR 259 add one lane each direction. N • SR 30 EB from SR 259 to Waterman Avenue,add one lane. N . 1-215 NB and SB from Jct.1-10 to Orange Show p Road,add one lane. N . 1-215 NB from Jet.SR 66 to Baseline Street,add /�� three lanes. l 1 W . 1-215 SB from Jct.SR 66 to Baseline Street,add two lanes. w . 1-215 NB and SB from Jct.SR 66 to University =1 CL Parkway,add one lane. t7 m Utilities and Services S stems m GP 5.15-1 In accordance with the State Water Code(Section City of San Ongoing City of San d 10610-10645),the City shall maintain an updated Bernardino Bernardino Urban Water Management Plan(Water System d Management Plan)which describes and evaluates v sources of supply,reasonable and practical efficient $ uses,reclamation and demand management activities,necessary to adequately serve future growth pursuant to the City's General Plan. a GP 5.15-2 The City of San Bernardino shall update the City of San Ongoing City of San Wastewater Collection System Master Plan to reflect Bernardino Bernardino 4 General Plan Update build-out statistics,review treatment facility capacity periodically and adjust r Sewer Capacity Fees when appropriate in v consultation with participating communities to E accommodate construction of new or expanded wastewater treatment and collection facilities. M c d E t U m Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino •Page 115 Packet Pg.291 6.E'g 6. Summary Table of Mitigation Measurer This page intentionally left blank. N 6 z Y C 0 C C E a N O U c C Cd C Q O d w d LO LO r N C O N j d W 7 IL C7 m v m !L- 0 'O C d a LL C d E L U A Y a V E L V A W_ a Page 116 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 292 0 N O Z 7. References 0 r d 7.1 PRINTED REFERENCES E Q v San Bernardino, City of. 2005a, November 5. City of San Bernardino General Plan Update Environmental c Impact Report. Prepared by the planning Center. U Y C d 2005b, November 5. City of San Bernardino General Plan. E 0. 0 California Department of Conservation Division of Land Resource Protection (DLRP). 2008. Los Angeles Important Farmland 2008. p California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2011. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic hig hways. N 7.2 WEB SITES c N Omnitrans. 2011. sbX. http://www.estreet-sbx.com/. M San Bernardino, City of. 2010. City of San Bernardino Sustainability Master Plan. http://www.sustainablesanbernardino.org. �� w a. 0 to U) -0 v r m U 0 E 7 C d 'O Q LL C d E L U A Y Q C d E r m Y a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Page 117 7. References This page intentionally left blank. N d z c m E v c m E 0 0 0 U M C d E CL 0 d m 0 v N 0 O .T d W 7 IL m w 0 d w C d U 0 E v c d v v LL C d E r v R « « a r c d E r U m « Page 118 The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg.294 6.E.g Appendix O Appendix A. San Bernardino Development Code, Transit Overlay District Z Zoning Standards and Guidelines N E a 0 U c d E O. O d d O m v N N C O .y (D It W IL IL 0 m N d w r v U O E a c m a v a LL C N E M U R a d E r a Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Appendix This page intentionally left blank. ° N r O Z c m E v c d E Q N v O U c m E CL O d d 0 m a N c O .y W 7 IL 0 m U) v m w C d U O E 7 c c d Q LL c d E z v m Q c m E t v A a The Planning Center January 2012 Pack 'Pg. 296 6,E.g QSan Bernardino Development Code January 9,2012 DRAFT o N 1 6 2 Y Article t- General Provisions 0 19.02.o6o ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND USE ZONING DISTRICTS d) a Transit Overlay District(TD) c 0 Y C d E Article 2- Land Use Zoning Districts 0 d v 19•19A - Transit Overlay District (TD) °. a Sections N 19.19A.olo Purpose c .N 19.19A.02o Applicability a>, 1 � w 19.19A.03o Transit Station Area Types w w 19.19A.04o General Provisions o= c� 19.19A.05o Building Form and Placement Standards ami v d 19.19A.o6o Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses d 19.19A.07o Residential Transition Standards o E 19.19A.o8o Parking v C 19.19A.o90 Subdivision Standards a a a 19.19A.1oo Design Guidelines Y c 19.19A.110 District Image E E v 19.19A.120 Transit Oriented Design a 19.19A.130 Site Planning and Architectural Design c w E 19.19A.140 Parking Design cLi Y 19.19A.150 Landscape Design a 1 Fa 6.E.g 19agAxio Purpose The Transit Overlay District(TD)and its regulations are established in order to 0 implement the City's General Plan policies promoting transit-oriented development N within San Bernardino.The intent of the TD is to allow and encourage an appropriate d mix and intensity of land uses in a compact pattern around transit stations that will Z foster transit usage, create new opportunities for economic growth, encourage inf ill and redevelopment, reduce dependency on the automobile, improve air quality, and promote high quality, interactive neighborhoods.The regulations and guidelines of E this chapter are based upon the following transit-oriented development area principles,consistent with the California Transit Village Development Planning Act of o 1994: d 1. An attractive transit station with surrounding pedestrian amenities as the focus of E the transit-oriented development area. 2. An appropriate mix and intensity of uses such as office, retail,entertainment, o residential, and recreational facilities that support transit use and are designed for convenient access by transit riders, pedestrians, and bicyclists. LO 3. Inviting and pedestrian-focused open spaces on both public and private N properties, such as smaller public pocket parks, civic plazas, outdoor dining areas, o r common greens, and other types of urban spaces. 4. A walkable and bikeable area with pleasant connections linking transit stations with businesses and neighborhoods. w 5. An interconnected street and non-vehicular network where walkways, bikeways, a 0 landscaping, and other streetscape amenities receive priority. m v i9.i9A.02o Applicability The Transit Overlay District(TD)applies to transit station areas within San o Bernardino.The TD establishes standards and regulations beyond those required by E the underlying base zones.Whenever the requirement of the TD conflicts with the a underlying base zone,the requirement of the TD shall govern. As transit service is expanded within San Bernardino,additional areas may be a designated as TD within the city.TD boundaries may also be expanded over time as t development becomes more transit oriented. Boundary adjustments within a half E mile of a transit station may be proposed by an applicant and approved at the discretion of the Community Development Director.The boundaries for each station c area are established below,as shown in Figures 1 to 13. c d The TD standards apply to the establishment of all new structures and uses within E the boundaries of the TD. Existing structures and uses those are inconsistent with the © TD standards may be maintained, repaired, altered, and expanded only as allowed by a Chapter 19.62(Nonconforming Structures and Uses). 2 Packet Pg. 298 t. Figure t Kendall Drive and Palm Avenue Transit Station Area v � ti F N Y Nyary 104 E `�♦ S d'��nowar .Uri _ 6a ` ,r C Sh'e 0he Q 0 O U � Wasngs�cr< d c � d V ` m O W 7 o. 0 m m d Trans ta'on UO .... Build- Line to (see section 79.19A.040) «o,% E� c m Q LL G d E U U R Q G d E t U © Q 3 PacketPg. 299 6E.g Figure z. Kendall Drive and Little Mountain Drive Transit Station Area c N _ O m Hill O Z m c'a o ap° pP irwT � I 'y �SrOP `d% i0 E n U C U i E ti r'a'm !d _ � d kP _ U i - p"%ate ♦� ���1c�e11�� .' E erOOklipr W4tl$ `'� —_ Oa a oc ♦� c m= 41st O Ln 1.� _ � .��'� o 1101q,11 4) W a. a t7 m v d w OTrash Statio c •••• euiiaao U 4f (s t jR,4an.o40) „�,q E C d Q LL C d E r U IRS i± Q 1 c m E L V W ® Q 4 Packet Pg. 300 6.Eg Figure 3. Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills Drive Transit Station Area mo � �� ' 0 N rTT r O Z c d C d E v o U E z a c a i�. �.�_ -_rbmm°• W v U7 N 0 O N O ' d W a m m m m w m Transit Station U o Lin ,.z. o ••••'Build-te - \ (see section 14.19 .040)- nanor u,— E v c m v v Q LL C d E r U 16 r Q C d E r ns O a 5 Packet Pg. 301 © Figure 4. E Street and Marshall Boulevard Transit Station Area L` 4\ N O Z C th Rush 0 a � r 35th _ y 0. t _ > �� � -34th m m 0 � as O rI 0 - N HI 1 1 33rd �T �, ry a Marshall ., © 1a 1 1 a T 31st m m 7 1 � W L gum _ ' ® �.. 301h L) � Ek 0 O Transit Station � t U a 29th O mop Build-to Line (see section 19.19A.0a 49 xwro V G 13 a u_ c v E r v m Q c m E r v M V 6 Packet Pg. 302"'=r Figure 5. E Street and Highland Avenue Transit Station Area Mirada 4 j m a c r a . .28th c = u in a- 28th.' N u y m Alexander O u a Alexander - Z m H � v m .11i, C 27th 27th �� d Courtand w �'- E 26th Counland 26ffi --^ i. 26df tom+ �1 N 26th = r 1 25th m -- E 25th I' 1 25th a 25th - c 24th 6_ a - O 24111 U 24th —11 24th m , U r � Y II-- -------Ir I d 23rd — I 1 1 - E .Highland I ... ,.. . . . l 1.J 1 HighfanA 1 —L_._._. i > 21st z,sl L . 21st 1 Lr J a z o LL111 1L. LO r 1 20th �.—_r- 20th 21st m LO 1 20th y a _' c it CamPUS�( 1 20th 0 19111 L_ 19th 19th C o BM 1 18th _ b > F WwiLLLU N j 17th 171h `v W II IIIII,ujJJ 17Th S, iii CO CL p 16th lJf FC-CF CO t �c O It 0 3 --' 151h n ® m Transit Station t �' V (�7�� Build-to Line ; lu g }� lW�,,,,;.i ,{ ,, .i. (see section 19.19A.040) _ E C m 9 Q LL C m E L U m Y a d E r © a 7 Packet Pg. 303 ,6E.g Figure 6. E Street and Baseline Avenue Transit Station Area lD 11 ._ y� � 17th 6h'- t 1 o !an � F 17th N N 16Ma > 16N 6 Z s .Evans I N C tt Evans I `y 'o - 4) t I I�L-. I 15th d 15th j 15t 'O h.' l r - � Magnolia Magnolia C N tagnoliaY lath Q LL LI m N 14N 4) 14th 'a - t r�� r Virginia -v-- O Home r / I Wabash I___inr____� d x r— C. C� 1 v _ I o Y > Iola N is'la �1 ��IIPPII Baseline I__�.�1... ) Baseline r Orange f a ( Orange o a =J I o I J • � _ 11th a I 11th N a Olive ® Olive Olive I Olive > © 1 — e m a d 701h P temple Temple I y I W C N t0 -� I,iii tLIi dlWlli m r I In CD m J U)]j Union I J m-- -O L m d M'M A Transit Station - E _ c Build-to Line (see section 19.19A.040), „u„U SCni _ G d Q LL C 4) s O A Q C W E L O Q 8 Figure 7. University Avenue and North Parkway Transit Station Area i Lyon Levee 0 ° C N r 00 O C d E 'a c w E Q .' v �' ; California State'University f 1 of San Bar iardino O d E LnO D e eete 00 O Q` ������^^^��� �a►oae.�� w .y C7e)7,0� esM. 17 1 Rainier ) 'P0 7,s�o LU Sh a c a over � „ � �� .` 6 .� � W l �`�'- J d �, ya�o `y :i _ .." . ansit Station �/T� o `.../. BBuild-to Line L— �... sae section 19.1 9A.04 „oi+o euu E a c v a Q LL r C d E s U A r Q i+ C d E t V lD w © Q 9 6.E.g I'i l Figure 8. E Street and North Mall Way Transit Station Area Lem 6 C Z ®q C O E C d E 0 U c m E e. 0 v ` h Ala* O Benedi uul V N crest c 0 o C © - .show - I t •' �—' orange f� W Orange Shop§~ a a m m a v w r C\ v Transit Station U 0 .... Build-to Line (see section 19.19A.040) xo�rowu � c m a LL C d E L U A Q r C d E L V R V © a 10 Packet Pg. 306 ¢:E:9 Figure 9. E Street and Court Street Transit Station Area RIM O d E IN "IT— m Vine x LL Q "T(T*Ti r rr c_I TT 7th ' �b1Y1T�1'LYllyllY E m C �.� Nctona � d U.U,LLL,iL_ µ'L SVrucc a , > Church 5th D I in t D •r D ' 4th c C c O Court ' f d ply 2nd W s D D .• LL t King V `A GI W L—L o W HEM Transit Station T� U � Build-to Line r �� �_ (see section 19.19A.040) „«r c m a V Q LL w C d E s v R a c m E r v A Qa n 6.E.g Figure lo. E Street and Rialto Avenue Transit Station Area N W E 14 C �� all a 0 LM E CL .... o Congress- � Congress 1 .N 11 Athol �— _,..._ ��, © Columbia 1 ' d o Q . ' Cluster m o ,� K !•�-----, m Valley Is > - - W M m- a m ry a L ,^ L ..� Vm O ] 1. I Q d 0 N Oak a) d U Transit Station U C � � F... (see section 19.19A.040 E Build to Line U C d a Q LL C d E s u M x Q c d E s u A © Q iz Packet Pg. 308 i I 6.E.g i Figure 11. Hospitality Lane and Hunts Lane Transit Station Area N �] O Z c e E v __� ❑ — c im m R � 0 1 U Y C 1_T E E i — � o 1 O .N O � 7 a m m U) v OTransit Station U II 1 1 P=M o •• Build-to Line E r- U(I177�3,. (see section 19.19A.040) no�roecw c d v v Q LL G d E t U ro Q C d E L U 14 © Q 13 Packet PW9 6.E.g Figure 12. Hospitality Lane and Carnegie Drive Transit Station Area 0 T O Z V C a, d o E c a _ C d E N O U � � C W E a _ o m - m mom — o OHarriman Rosewood W X11 �����.�������.► D nT_ -i i a JJJJ_111LJ � edlan m d —�� �............ O Transit Station U Ii o •••• Build-to Line � (see section 19.19A.040) wm¢ur o r c w a v LL C d E L U t0 Q C N E r U R © Q 14 Packet Pg. 3 00 Figure 13. Hospitality Lane and Tippecanoe Avenue Transit Station Area 0 N O i Z � � C d `o U_ C N C . d L..... vicl d r rm --- ' �1111111LL1_.,Laurelwootl Hardt d D i CL —Hardt_ O / Davidson Carnegie ` „ - ' Davidson Nosp6ahty Coulston n Vf ai Te� E 0 Lee x O o Sycamore N ' �. O > w Laurelwood N . Rosewo! wow / V (, d 5tatl�nl d) ••Buiid't SLine (see section 19.19A.040) , .. _. C c v a u: d E L U A Q C N E L U Y Y Q a 15 6.E.g 19•i9A.03o Transit Station Area Types This chapter establishes five transit station area types, each with its own unique o character and neighborhood scale.The transit station area types are based on the design and function of the stations and the predominant development patterns z° surrounding the station.The station area types are a framework for tailoring the development regulations for each of the station areas.The station area types also E provide a guide for applying the TD to additional areas within the city. E A. Kendall Drive Neighborhood Stations.This type of station area provides Q N transit access to serve neighborhoods and businesses in the Kendall Drive o area,within an approximately io-minute walk or up to a half-mile radius.The U station area is typically a predominantly residential area with supporting neighborhood or community level retail and services.The transit stations are o designed as pull-up stations along an arterial and may include transfers between bus rapid transit(BRT)and local bus service.The following transit o station areas are identified as Neighborhood Walk-up Station areas: v 1) Kendall Drive and Palm Avenue N 2) Kendall Drive and Little Mountain Drive c 0 Mn 3) Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills Drive B. E Street Neighborhood Stations.This type of station area provides transit w access to serve surrounding neighborhoods and businesses in the E Street area north of 8th Street,within an approximately io-minute walk or up to a CO half-mile radius.The station area is typically a predominantly residential area U) with supporting neighborhood or community level retail and services.The d transit stations are designed as pull-up stations along an arterial and may r include transfers between BRT and local bus service.The following transit v station areas are identified as Neighborhood Walk-up Station areas: ° E 1) E Street and Marshall Boulevard v 2) E Street and Highland Avenue a 3) E.Street and Baseline Avenue c d E r U N Q C d E L U © a 16 PacketPg. 312 6.E.g C. Village/Urban Center Station Areas.This type of station area serves as a high- activity center and village center for nearby residential neighborhoods, up to a half mile radius.The area contains a variety of neighborhood and community c level retail uses and services,along with the integration of higher intensity r housing including student housing,and offices uses in a mixed-use z° configuration.The transit stations within this station area type are designed as either a pull-up station along an arterial,or as an in-line station.The following E transit station areas are identified as Village/Urban Center Station areas: E 1) University Avenue and North Parkway a d 0 2) E Street and North Mall Way c i c D. Downtown Station Area.This type of station area is intended for the highest E intensity of development within in the city.The downtown station areas o contain a planned mix of employment-intensive office,civic uses, regional- level retail and service uses, entertainment, hospitality, education,hospital or 0 medical facilities,and high density residential uses in a compact urban form. Uses are to be served by an interconnected multi-modal transportation center and public spaces network that will accommodate the highest levels of N pedestrian activity.The following transit station areas are identified as o Downtown Station Areas: w d 1) E Street and Court Street W 2) E Street and Rialto Avenue a c� E. Employment Center Station Areas.This type of station area serves as concentrated employment areas within the city.They contain a mix of office v or high employment industrial uses, educational or technical training institutions,hospital or medical facilities, supporting retail,restaurant, entertainment,and other similar services. Higher density residential g development, in mixed-use configurations, may also be located in E Employment Center Station Areas.The transit stations within this station area type are designed as either a pull-up station along an arterial, or as an in-line station.The following transit station areas are identified as Employment a Center Station: c 1) Hospitality Lane and Hunts Lane E z 2) Hospitality Lane and Carnegie Drive a 3) Hospitality Lane and Tippecanoe Avenue E t U N a 17 Packet Pg. 313 19•i9A.04o General Provisions A. Precedence.The requirements of this chapter take precedence over the o citywide regulations found elsewhere in the City of San Bernardino r Development Code. In the event of a conflict between this chapter and other z6 portions of the Development Code,the provisions of this chapter shall govern. N B. Build-to Line.This chapter establishes standards for a Build-to Line(s)that apply to the TDs. Build-to Line is a line(s)established at a certain distance from E the corresponding lot line along which the building, or a portion thereof, must a d be built.The purpose of the build-to line is to ensure that redevelopment c within the TD is well integrated with adjacent development and enhances the design character of existing streets,where appropriate. Build-to Lines also E help to create consistent and strong pedestrian and public spaces that c advance commercial development and activity.The location of applicable Build-to Lines is shown on Figures 1 through 13 of this chapter.Standards that o apply to properties adjacent to a Build-to Line are located in Section 19•19A.050 below. LO C. Modifications to Existing Development.All legally established structures and N uses within the TD which do not confirm with the standards contained within g this chapter shall be deemed legal nonconforming uses and/or structures.The ® repair,renovation,and minor expansion to these uses and structures shall be allowed as permitted by Chapter t9.62(Nonconforming Structures and Uses). W w t9•t9A.05o Building Form and Placement Standards m m A. Purpose and Intent.This section establishes standards for building form and placement within the TD. Customized standards are provided for each station w area type.The intent of these standards is to ensure excellence in community and building design in order to create a vibrant and well-defined public realm 0 that is pedestrian-friendly and supports transit use. E v B. Standards Established. Building form and placement standards in the TD are the same as in the base zoning district,except as follows; a 1) Minimum and maximum requirements for Build-to Line setback, building height, and upper floor step-back shall follow the standards specified in E Table 19A.oi. z) New development within TD station areas shall have no minimum lot size a and no maximum lot coverage requirements. E 3) New development along existing railroad right-of-way shall provide a minimum io-foot setback for landscaping and/or a multiuse pathway to a accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. 18 6.E.g C. Residential Density. 1) Commercial Base Zones. When the TD applies to property within a commercial base zone that already allows for residential uses,the 0 N maximum permitted density of the underlying zone shall apply. e Z z) Residential Base Zones. When the TD applies to property within a residential base zone,maximum permitted residential density shall be the E same as the base zone. d E D. Commercial Intensity.When the TD applies to property within a commercial base zone,the maximum permitted intensity of the underlying zone shall 0 apply. a� Table 19A.o1 Building Form and Placement Standards 0. E a) Build-to Line Upper Floor d TD Station Areas Setback Building Height['] Step-back z Kendall Minimum None[3] None None N Neighborhood Station Areas Maximum 25 ft.[4] 30 ft./z stories None N E Street Minimum None[3] None 8 ft. c ® Neighborhood Station Areas Maximum 15 ft[4] 42 ft. (3 stories None Village/Urban Minimum None None 8 ft. w Station Areas Maximum 15 ft[4] 56 ft./4 stories None a t7 Downtown Minimum None[3] None 8 ft. Station Areas Maximum 15 ft[4] loo ft./7 stories[5] None d w Employment Minimum None[3] None 8 ft. v Center Station Areas Maximum 25 ft.[4] 75 ft./6 stories None ° E Notes: � [1]Building height of new development adjacent to existing single-family residential zones may not exceed 30ft/2 stories c applicable to all TD station areas. � [z]Upper floor step-back shall be measured from the building wall at the street level. -Q [3]Building must be set back to provide for a minimum 10-foot sidewalk including street trees.Build-to line setback along Q Tippecanoe Avenue shall provide for landscaping and a multiuse pathway to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. LL [4]Setback areas from the build-to line not occupied by a structure or driveway shall be landscaped and/or contain semi-public amenities such courtyards or outdoor seating areas. d [5]Additional height bonus may be allowed per section 19.06.030(2XE). E L U A Q C N E U U N Q 19 Packet Pg.315 6.fig E. Building Presence along Build-to Lines.The primary building(s) located on a parcel shall occupy the following minimum linear percentage of the parcel width fronting a build-to line: o N r i) Kendall Neighborhood Station Area: 50% 6 z z) E Street Neighborhood Station Area: 60% d E 3) Village/Urban Center Station Area: 70% E 4) Downtown Station Area: 8o% a m 5) Employment Center Station Area: 50% v c F. Ground Floor Transparency.The ground floor building fa4ade facing a street E frontage line shall consist of the following minimum area percentage glass o doors,windows, or other transparent materials. d 0 1) Kendall Neighborhood Station Area: 50% LO z) E Street Neighborhood Station Area: 50% N 3) Village/Urban Center Station Area: 75% c N 4) Downtown Station Area: 75% Ix 5) Employment Center Station Area: 50% w G. Entrance Orientation. a 0 to 1) Within the Kendall Neighborhood station area type,all ground-floor '0 building facades fronting a primary street shall feature a main building LD entrance. d U z) Within the E Street Neighborhood,Village/Urban Center, Downtown, and Employment Center station area types,all ground-floor building facades E E fronting a primary street shall feature the building's main entrance. `w a a H. Minimum First Floor Ceiling Height. For buildings with ground floor a commercial uses, the minimum required floor to ceiling height at the ground r floor level for buildings facing public frontage lines shall be 15 feet. E I. Building and Site Design. Refer to Sections 19.19A.140 to 19.19A.16o for design guidelines applicable to building form and placement within the Transit Overlay District. c W E r v x a zo 7aC s1srr:: 6.E.g i9•i9A.o6o Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses A. Purpose and Intent.This section identifies permitted, conditionally permitted, c and prohibited land uses within the TD.The intent of these regulations is to N T permit and encourage land uses that create a pedestrian-friendly environment z6 that supports transit use and thriving commercial districts and residential c neighborhoods. E E B. Land Use Regulations—Commercial Base Zones.When the TD applies to d property within a commercial base zone, permitted and conditionally permitted shall be the same as the base commercial zone, except as specified c below. L) c m 1) Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted with the approval of a E 0. Development Permit: 0 d m • Convenience stores pursuant to Section ig.o6.025. o • Dry cleaners v • Educational services • Medical/care facilities/social services (within CCS-1 only) • Mixed-use(with residential where allowed in commercial base zones) 0 • Mobile vendors An • Neighborhood grocery stores X • Parking structures w z) Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: m N • Auto parts sales d • Auto repair • Car, RV, and truck sales m U • Car Washes $ • Service Stations E • Service Commercial uses pursuant to Table o6.oi J., excluding c d veterinary services V • Impound vehicle storage yard a • Vehicle leasing/rental LL • RV parks • Blood banks r v • Drive-thru commercial uses m • Restaurants with drive-thru • Nurseries r U m Y 21 17 B:B.g 19•i9A.07o Residential Transition Standards A. Purpose.This section establishes standards to ensure that new development 5 in the TD is compatible with adjacent single-family residential uses. N 6 B. Applicability.The following standards apply to buildings located on a parcel Z that either: aa, E v 1) Shares a property line with an existing single-family residential zone; or d E z) Faces an existing single-family residential zone across a street. d 0 0 C. Building Setbacks. Y C d 1) Front Setbacks. For a parcel located across a street from an existing single- E 0. family residential zone,the front setback shall be no less than the average a) m front setback requirement of the facing homes block face but not more 'w than zo ft. °. v z) Interior Side Setbacks. For a parcel sharing an interior side property line with an existing single-family residential zone,the interior side setback N shall no less than the interior side setback requirement of the adjacent r 0 property but not more than zo ft. 2 d 3) Rear Setbacks. For a parcel sharing a rear property line with an existing single-family residential zone,the rear setback requirement shall be no w less than io feet. D a cO D. Upper Floor Step-backs. CO v 1) Front Building Walls. For a parcel located across a street from an existing m single-family residential zone,the height of the front building wall shall not exceed z stories and 30 feet. 0 E z) Side and Rear Building Walls. For a parcel sharing an interior side or rear 'o property line with an existing single-family residential zone, the height of the side or rear building wall, as applicable, shall not exceed z stories and a 30 feet. LL Y 3) Upper Floors. When permitted by the applicable zone, any portion of a E building taller than z stories or 30 feet shall step back a minimum of 8 feet from the first-and second-story building walls. a E. Commercial Service Location and Screening. E i) outdoor storage,trash collection and loading areas associated with commercial uses shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet from any property Q line abutting a parcel occupied by a detached single-family home. 22 6.E.g 2) Outdoor storage,trash collection, and loading areas shall be located and screened from view such that they are not visible from any parcel occupied by a detached single-family home. b N F. Parking and Driveways.See Section 19.20.100, Subsection G(Parking Buffers). o Z G. Noise Generating Activities.Outdoor dining, amplified music,and other noise- d generating activities shall be set back a minimum of 150 feet from the E property line of any parcel occupied by a detached single-family home. v E a 0 19.i9A.o8o Parking d A. Purpose. o d i) This section establishes parking standards that apply to new and o expanded land uses in the TD.The intent of the standards is to ensure the success of the transit corridor by providing efficient parking in the corridor.This includes design standards for parking area design and parking supply standards. N 0 2) The parking requirements reflect the immaturity of the transit system A along the corridor.As the system matures,there will be increased potential to refine the parking requirements,applying techniques such as W parking maximums(e.g., no minimum parking requirements).These w requirements should be updated as the system matures to reflect the change in required parking along the corridor. N A. Required On-Site Parking.All land uses within the TD shall provide on-site parking as shown in Table 19A.02(Required On-Site Parking)unless further r d reductions can be justified as part of project approval by utilizing shared o parking, unbundled parking, in-lieu parking fees,or other parking reduction E techniques,as described below: C m 1) Shared parking assessment shall be completed using the latest v information from ULI's(Urban Land Institute's)Shared Parking. a LL z) Unbundled parking occurs when development does not include parking in d the standard cost of the facilities(e.g., residents/employees must pay E additional cost for the right to park on-site). o a 3) In-lieu parking fees are effective if a parking district or other management agency owns and maintains parking facilities.With in-lieu fees,a developer can pay the identified fee for the right to use that parking and reduce their U own on-site parking facilities. a 23 Packet Pg.319 6.E.g QTable 19A.02 Required On-Site Parking Base Zoning District Parking Requirement o (per sq.ft.of leasable area,unless otherwise noted) N Commercial General CG-1 1 space per 300 sq.ft. Commercial General—Baseline/Mt.Vernon CG-2 1 space per 500 sq.ft. 6 Commercial General—University Village CG-3 1 space per 250 sq.ft. c Commercial Office CO 1 space per 370 sq.ft. E Commercial Regional—Malls(CR-1) 1 space per 250 sq.ft. Commercial Regional—Downtown(CR-2) 1 space per 500 sq.ft. E Commercial Regional—Tri-City/Club(CR-3) 1 space per 250 sq.ft. Central City South CCS-1) 1 space per 500 sq.ft. 0 Commercial Heavy(CH) 1 space per 300 sq.ft. c Industrial Heavy IH) 1 space per 1,230 sq.ft.of gross floor area Office Industrial Park OIP) 1 space per 350 sq.ft. o Public/Commercial Recreation(PCR) Special study required Public Facilities (PF) Special study required o Public Flood Control PFC) 1 space per access point Residential High(RH) 1 space per unit Residential Low(RL) 1 space per unit Residential Medium(RM) 1 space per unit C1' c Residential Medium High RMH 1 space per unit 3 Residential Suburban RS 2 spaces per unit Residential Urban RU 1 s ace per unit Industrial Light IL 1 spa ce er 625 sq.ft. W W B. Residential Guest Parking.Current visitor and guest parking standards of the a c� underlying zone shall apply. On-street parking may be considered for visitors to residential uses along public and private streets adjacent to the residential use. - d C. Handicapped Parking Requirements. Handicapped parking space design shall o be consistent with approved designs in the off-street parking standards E Section 19.24.050 v D. Bicycle Parking Requirements.One bicycle parking space shall be provided for each ten automobile parking spaces provided. For office and multifamily uses, u_ bicycle parking should be provided in sheltered and secure facilities. m E. Location of Surface Parking. New surface parking lots shall not be located E between the front wall of a building and a public street.Surface parking shall be located to the rear or side of buildings. If surface parking is not feasible, all a other parking shall be located in structures, underground, and/or off-site. v E F. Parking Structures.All multistory parking structures shall be lined with commercial,retail, or residential uses on the ground floor along primary build- a to lines, except for pedestrian and vehicular entries into the parking structure. 24 Packet Pg. 320 6.E.g OG. Surface Parking Lot Screening. 1) Surface parking lots abutting a public sidewalk or street shall provide a 0 landscaped buffer and/or decorative or"greenwall"screening along the N perimeter of the parking lot abutting the sidewalk or street. o Z 2) Surface parking abutting a residential zone shall provide a six foot high v decorative wall and a landscaped buffer at least 8 feet in width. E c 0 H. Alley Access. For new structures adjacent to a rear alley,service access to the E property shall be provided only through the rear alley. 0 I. Driveways.All new driveways within a TD shall comply with the following U c standards. 0 E 0- 1) Driveways shall comply with the dimension standards shown in Table 2 19A.03(Driveway Dimension Standards). o 2) All new curb cuts providing access to a driveway from a public street shall be separated a minimum distance of 50 feet from another existing or new curb cut, unless the parcel size requires shorter spacing. In that case, a N minimum spacing of 35 feet shall be provided. o N O 3) Parking spaces shall not be located along the sides of a driveway. o: Table 19A.03 Driveway Dimension Standards w M Drivewa y Width cal Driveway Type Minimum Maximum � 1-wa 8 ft. 12 ft. d 2-way 20 ft. 25 ft. r d U O E C V C O Q LL C d E r U Q C d E L U @ O a 25 Packet Pg. 321 i9•i9A.ogo Subdivision Standards A. Purpose.This section establishes standards for the subdivision of parcels S within the TD to ensure that large parcels are subdivided in a manner that supports a walkable,transit-oriented environment. z° Y B. Applicability.The following standards apply to subdivisions of parcels io acres or greater. d C. Block Lengths. E d 1) Except as permitted by Subsection z below,the maximum length of a 0 block created by the establishment of one or more new streets shall not exceed 400 feet. E a 0 z) The City may approve a block length in excess of 400 feet when necessary to achieve project compliance with connectivity standards in Subsection D o below, or if there are physical limitations, such as the size of the project area, that do not allow for compliance with this standard. LO 3) Block lengths shall be measured as the length of property abutting one N side of a street between either the two nearest intersecting streets or the nearest such street and any other physical barrier to the continuity of v development. Block lengths shall be measured from property lines that W intersect at an angle of 45 degrees or more. W w D. Connectivity Standards. m 1) New streets established within the TD shall align and connect with any existing adjacent street. g, w r z) Block lengths shall increase connectivity to surrounding existing and planned pedestrian and bicycle facilities. E M 3) New development of large sites(in excess of one acre) shall maintain and v c enhance connectivity with a hierarchy of public streets, private streets, walks and bike paths. Q U 4) Bicycle/pedestrian connections shall be provided at each cul-de-sac end, c where feasible. E r U M x Q c m E L A Qa 26 6.E.g i9•19A•foo Design Guidelines The guidelines are intended to promote quality design,consistent with City o General Plan goals and objectives,while providing a level of flexibility to r encourage creative design.These design guidelines implement various policies in z6 the Land Use, Housing, Economic Development,Community Design,Circulation, and Natural Resources and Conservation Elements pertaining to transit oriented E development. E A. Purpose and Intent.The following design guidelines are intended to direct the a d physical design of building sites,architecture, and landscape elements located 0 within the City's Transit Overlay District(TD).This comprehensive approach y represents a more understandable and predictable role in shaping each TD's physical future by emphasizing community form, architectural typologies,and o landscape design that reinforce traditional and modern development patterns. In the Downtown,Village/Urban Center,and Employment Center o station areas,contemporary architecture that has a strong pedestrian orientation,visual interest on the ground floor, quality long lasting materials, human scale,and articulated facades are also encouraged.The guidelines are intended to complement the mandatory TD development regulations contained in this chapter by providing design solutions and interpretations of •0 the mandatory regulations. All projects subject to design review are expected to incorporate the guidelines in a manner that responds to the unique characteristics of each TD, individual site,and adjacent parcels.A project that is consistent with the guidelines is likely to be well-received and expedited through the review in process. w B. Applicability.The provisions of this section shall apply to all TDs within the City.Any addition,remodeling, relocation, or construction requiring a building 0 permit within any TD is subject to review and shall adhere to these guidelines E where applicable. m C. Interpretation.Compliance with a design guideline written as a "should"is 0 a discretionary.A design guideline written with an action verb(e.g.,provide, LL use, locate,create, establish, employ)is highly recommended. Using these terms are important, but may be waived or modified based upon an E alternative deemed acceptable through the design review process. D. Architectural Typology.The design guidelines for architectural typologies a contained in this section (i.e.,Courtyard Housing, Row houses, Live/Work W Units, Stacked Flats, Mixed Use, and Office)are not all inclusive. Other E architectural typologies may also be appropriate for other permitted uses as listed in the development code. a 27 .:. ._ 9.323 6.E.g i9.i9A.iio District Image The intent of this section is to establish a design framework for the development, o enhancement, and preservation of San Bernardino Transit Overlay Districts, based N upon traditional planning and urban design patterns, historical precedents, and d sustainability principles that ultimately drive the physical form of each district. Z c m The over arching community vision for Transit Overlay Districts originates from a E v desire to create compact pedestrian-oriented environments consistent with traditional transit oriented development principles which advocate: a v v 1. Compact Transit Districts. Characterized by 0 easy access to multi-modal transit systems,a wide variety of housing types E CL and services,and job sites located very o close at hand. d 0 z. Connectivity.Characterized by a fine- grained and interconnected street network ensuring that all trips are as short N as possible, disperse congestion, and are ° "� o compatible with walking, biking, and v N transit. 3. Walkability. Characterized by commercial w business,service establishments, a employment, and transit facilities that are m located within a five-minute walk. w •a v 4. Placemaking. Characterized by urban patterns, blockscapes,architecture,and landscaping that reinforces and o complements the design heritage of the E region. d 5. Employment Accessibility. Characterized by good jobs located in higher-intensity LL "vertical campuses"located close to a Z N variety of housing opportunities. E U 6. Diversity of Housing Types. Characterized a by a fine grain of housing typologies, designed to complement a wide variety of d income levels and associated lifestyles. U a 28 Packet Pg. 324 6.E.g O19.19A.120 Transit Oriented Design A transit district is a defined, higher-intensity, multimodal quarter designed to c accommodate a variety of coordinated movement systems, including commuter N rail, light rail,streetcar, BRT, bus,shuttle, pedestrian, and automobiles. c Z Transit oriented development is intended to maximize access to mass transit amenities with centrally located transit stations commonly surrounded by relatively high-intensity commercial,office,and residential development. In general,successful transit oriented districts are well-used and well-loved people a places,enriched by a dynamic mix of land uses, defined street-adjacent o architecture,and comfortable urban spaces.Transit oriented districts are highly U permeable,composed of an extensive network of transit modes that physically and visually link to the greater community,encouraging enhanced connectivity E that ultimately embraces transit ridership. d d The essence of a sustainable transit district is found in an integrated system of commercial, residential, employment, and recreation uses coupled with a diversity of alternative circulation/transportation features that knit the district together in an integrated and holistic fashion.The goal is a low-carbon district N with a sense of place, concentration of activities coupled with urban spaces,and o efficient architecture where daily life can unfold. Ln d Create a density gradient, locating the highest intensity/density land uses closest w to transit stations,transitioning outward a to lower intensity/density uses. m U) ■ Locate pedestrian and transit-friendly w commercial activities at the ground level, r office and residential above where supported by the market. Use ground- - - floor storefront windows to enliven the street by providing visual interest that m encourages people to walk and take v transit. a LL ■ Provide civic amenities and urban open m space uses within transit districts designed E V to serve transit users and residents. _ w a V E S U © a 29 Packet Pg. 325 6.E.g QDevelop a hierarchy of street designs that vary in modal emphasis, providing a balanced transportation system that b accommodates transit,automobiles, bicyclists,and pedestrians. z° Y ■ Intensify building masses at corners to y v accommodate pedestrian generating L uses that enhance ridership # EE ■ Locate primary building entrances facing the public street,with clear connections to the adjacent sidewalk, ensuring r pleasant and simple access for E CL pedestrians. d ■ Provide a pedestrian-scaled street network composed of a dense grid of a streets with short, direct connections between land uses and transit amenities. N Provide connections to local and regional multiuse paths and trails that o encourage longer walking and bicycle trips improving accessibility for transit " users. v ■ Configure parking to be unobtrusive by orienting parking away from the w pedestrian realm, behind buildings, in structures,or underground. Utilize on- a street parking,where feasible,to reduce off-street parking requirements, m providing parking opportunities to adjacent retail and service uses. V) ° ■ Combine traditional ground-floor storefront commercial facilities at corner r transit stop locations,enhancing"trip chaining"—performing one or more v errand on the same trip. ° E ■ Promote an interconnected street network and the use of short blocks(two to five net acres)to increase vehicular and pedestrian route choice,thus v enhancing connectivity, reducing trip length and vehicular greenhouse gas a (GHG)emissions. LL c • Promote tight urban blocks that are not dominated by large surface parking E areas, reducing convection losses and heat gains as adjacent buildings protect one another from the wind and sun. a • Use street trees to modify the climate in a passive way(absorbing rather that E reflecting heat energy, leaving opposed to the use of tacked-on architectural E "green-bling." ° a - ■ Create high-performance,energy-efficient buildings and infrastructure. 30 PacketPg. 326 6.E.g +v ig•i9A.130 Site Planning and Architectural Design A. Site Planning.Site planning within o the TD should promote traditional N time honored building placements jllt' '"±i` o while accommodating pedestrian Z plazas,courtyards, and parking located internal to the site.The goal is to place buildings adjacent E to the public streetscape in order to enhance the pedestrian o experience by creating an enclosed and defined environment,while sensitively accommodating the automobile.This traditional setting fosters a g people-oriented environment in which the needs of everyday life are easily accessible.These guidelines are also intended to accommodate a wide variety o of building typologies, in an effort to create a dynamic environment that promotes connectivity,walkability,commerce,jobs/housing balance,and transit ridership. N C 1) Residential Site Planning.The °- N ® residential site planning guidelines address a wide range of architectural typologies w designed to create a fine- grained district image.The 0 intent is to sensitively (n orchestrate the location, d placement,and orientation of r various multifamily attached dwelling types consistent with ° the nature of transit oriented development districts.What is envisioned is a small-scale"smattering"of traditional housing types—courtyard housing, row houses, stacked flats—seamlessly integrated into the fabric a of the district. Ultimately,the goal is to disperse a wide variety of traditional multi-family attached dwelling types throughout the transit r district,oriented toward the public realm, as opposed to internal oriented gated mega-complexes. By sensitively siting multifamily dwelling types, it is envisioned that higher-density dwellings will successfully blend into the a TD,welcoming a variety of living arrangements and associated lifestyles. c v E L U R ® a 31 Packet Pg. 327 6.E.g z) Commercial and Office Site Planning.The commercial and office site planning guidelines are o intended to promote time- honored building placements to z° concentrate live-work, mixed- use,and office structures to £ frame and enclose the public streetscape. Buildings are to be E placed near to the public streetscape in order to create an enclosed and defined environment that 0 promotes commerce,social interaction,and transit ridership.The purpose is to create a fine-grained environment whereby modest live-work E housing coexists with higher-intensity mixed use and office nodes and 0 adjacent residential neighborhoods.This traditional setting fosters a > people-oriented environment in which the needs of everyday life are easily o accessible—an atmosphere that places automobiles behind buildings, concentrates activities, defines urban space,and promotes building placements that celebrate people. N B. Architectural Design and Image.The °- N San Bernardino Transit Overlay District architectural image is born out of a desire to create enduring w and human-scaled expressions a rooted in the traditional architectural m heritage of the region.This traditional architectural image typically fosters a people-oriented environment characterized by a w 0 variety of building designs that frame and define the public streetscape. E All elements of architecture were traditionally constructed of highly durable materials, defined by a discernible base,middle, and top that add architectural rhythm to the streetscape.Composed of both modern interpretations and a traditional architectural precedents, architecture should be defined by cultural r influences,graced by indigenous materials,and constructed with the time- honored design principles of mass,scale,and rhythm.The following most common architectural typologies are defined for the TD:courtyard housing, =° row houses, stacked flats, live-work units, mixed-use, and office buildings.The a guidelines do not preclude variations in these types of development or other v residential and non-residential products to be built. Ultimately,the purpose is s to avoid superficial "franchise style"architecture in favor of a more traditional " © architectural image that embraces enjoyable life on the street. a 32 Packet Pg. 328 1) Courtyard Housing. Courtyard ) g a housing is defined by multi-story +� ' - �• building masses containing individual c dwelling units that commonly enclose a centralized outdoor private z° courtyard space oftentimes containing formal gardens and E decorative pavers. c W E Courtyard housing consists of: Q d • Two to four story building masses that frame and define the public U streetscape. • Building masses enclose internally oriented courtyard space. E CL • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape and internal d courtyard. o • Modest building insets accommodate front yard gardens and forecourts. • Individual unit frontages should be accessed directly from the street and internal courtyard. • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. y .T m Traditionally within mild Mediterranean climates, such as Southern 0: California, courtyard housing was employed to capitalize on the positive w indoor/outdoor relationship characterized by multi-story building masses a that frame and enclose positive garden space.The attraction of courtyard m housing is its ability to function as a collection of individual units with (n private entries,yet having access to common space amenities. d w r v IIIi7g U III�III �1'll v G / . E 4� 3 L G u d L V Q LL V C d 1 E Q c i+ C d E L V R Q 33 Packet Pg.329 The design guidelines for courtyard housing include the following: a I d o O Z d E M c d E Q U i !1 4 Z b c e f E a 0 d m i 0 m Ln I N C a. Orchestrate multi-story courtyard housing building masses to frame and H enclose semi-private open space in the form of internalized courtyards and > patios(a, b, c, d,g, j, k, 1). b. Provide individual unit entrances oriented toward semi-private interior courtyards (k, 1)and semi-public street-oriented external forecourts(a, d). fn m c. Craft traditional courtyard housing with a distinctive base(anchoring the dwelling to the ground plane); shaft(transitional element which provides w window transparency), and capital (roof cap which terminates the top of the dwelling)(a, d,g,j). o E d. Avoid the use of continuous common exterior corridors. Instead, access upper-story dwelling units via attractive external staircases which are fully m integrated into the fabric of the building(c, i). a e. Provide simple changes in wall plane to reduce the apparent mass and scale of the dwelling, consistent with the architectural style of the home (a, g, i. U A f. Create building relief through the use of tower elements and building a projections designed to enhance facade variety and visual interest W. c d E g. Define the public and private realms by providing a distinguishable and u ornamented transitional portal (h). =° a 34 Packet Pg. 330 6.E.g 2 C d E L C E Q d U J E QC p W 1 N h. Support covered porches, upper-story loggias, and balconies with substantial columns, piers,and posts(b, d,e,f,g). 0 L Provide ample "punched"window and door recesses designed to express building mass. Minimum window and door recess should measure four W inches deep(b). m Ei D j. Provide traditional vertical orientated windows(a, b,g). a c� m k. Provide simple changes in wall plane to reduce the apparent mass and scale of the dwelling, consistent with the architectural style of the home (a,g, i.1) d U I. Provide protruding wing walls as a natural extension of the building, designed to enclose and define private outdoor patio spaces. E v c m. Use arcades and colonnades as semi-private transitional elements designed to frame courtyard spaces(c). Q LL n. Provide upper-story projecting balconies supported by protruding c dimensional timber corbels(d, e,g). E t U o. Configure courtyards in a usable fashion,designed to accommodate =° outdoor entertaining, recreation,and leisure amenities(j,k, 1). Q v p. Orient on-site garages toward the rear of the site accessed from an alley. z On-grade and tuck-under parking facilities should be provided, g characterized by enclosed garages designed to accommodate residents. a 35 Packet Pg. 331 6.E.g z) Row Houses.A row house is a multi-story single-family dwelling that shares a o common wall with adjacent units of the same type, 6 occupying the full width of the frontage line,designed to E frame and enclose the streetscape in a regimented E fashion. d a 0 Row house design consists of: d • Two-to-three story building masses that frame and define the public E 0. streetscape. —,° • Front dooryards accommodate raised stoops or garden. o • Individual units are directly accessible by pedestrians from the public street. • Outdoor terrace space sometimes occurs between the street—facing dwelling and rear garage. r • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. N d This traditional tall and slender attached building typology exhibits all the trappings of the classic urban oriented dwelling form, commonly defined w by multi-story building masses with raised stoops, projecting window bays, a and defined entrance features that greet the public realm. Row houses m typically form regimented street walls that promote streetscape continuity,framing and enclosing the public streetscape. d w r I� ..,. O E v c a Q LL C d E t U Q C U E U U f0 © Q 36 Packet Pg. 332 6.E.g The design guidelines include the following a o N r lr o Z C m® v E -o C d E Q d 0 O U b e E 0 CL w > W Ln G v N a. Provide two-to-three story building masses designed to frame and define o the public streetscape (a, d, g,j). Ln d b. Create consistent row house unit bay rhythms designed to form a consistent and disciplined street wall (a, d,g,j ). w c. Anchor row house corners with higher intensity towerfeatures (a, b). °• U m d. Craft traditional row houses with a distinctive base(anchoring the '0 dwelling to the ground plane), shaft(transitional element that provides V(—' zE window transparency),and capital (roof cap that terminates the top of the dwelling) (c,j). S e. Shelter residents by providing ample entrance indentations(e, i). Row E E v house building entrances should be designed with a minimum square d footage of zo square feet and minimum depth of 4 feet Q f. Define individual unit entrances oriented toward the public street(e, i). w c m g. Enhance interior viewing opportunities with bay window projections to E optimize viewing angle(a, b, c,g, h,j). a h. Provide traditional windows that are vertical in orientation(a, b, c,f, g, h, C 1)• d E r v m x 37 Packet Pg. 333 g J o 2 ■ a .,. v E C d E a m 0 0 h r d jJ 1 E O o a LO i. Recess window and door openings into the row house facades to express N the mass of the building(j). C 0 N j. Elevate row house units to ensure resident privacy while enhancing surveillance of the public streetscape(a,g, i,j, k). a ED k. Avoid locating entrances directly on-grade. Instead, entries should be n elevated 24 inches, minimum (a,g, i,j, k). a Co N I. Integrate exterior staircases and stoops into the fabric of the building(i). Design exterior staircases and stoops, including balusters, handrails, and :E treads, using similar materials as the row house dwelling. Prefabricated v v metal staircases shall not be permitted. 0 E m. Provide private outdoor open space in the form of stoops(i), balconies(f, '0 1), and dooryard gardens(k). Private open space should be a minimum of zoo square feet a n. Orient on-site parking garages toward the rear of the site accessed from an alley. E s v m Y W Q V d E r 0 m a 38 Packet Pg. 334 6.E.g 3) Stacked Flats.A flat is a self- contained housing unit that occupies only part of a building. q In a stacked-flat building, several units,above and beside each z° other share a common entry and d are accessed through common, E semiprivate spaces. O d E The design of stacked flats = a v consists of: o U • Three to four-story building masses that frame and define the public streetscape. a • Modest setback may accommodate front patio space. v • Buildings are accessed from a common street-adjacent entrance portal. o • Individual units are directly accessed from interior double-loaded hallways. • Internally oriented underground or podium parking is accessed from limited street portals. Internally oriented courtyards are located above parking areas. ° N lM� y In addition to their classic scale and eye-catching proportions,the beauty x of stacked-flat structures is their ability to frame and enclose broad w boulevards and avenues, creating a pedestrian-friendly environment. It is a this traditional relationship of the public street to the private building that m is critically important in establishing a sheltering and safe pedestrian N setting that enhances social interaction and commerce. w r U O 1 E t � IN LL C N E U R E r u m Q 39 Pac 8. 335 The design guidelines for stacked flats include the following: a d o N r Z 1 L _ C r E d IA 0 71 1 U c b C e 1 e� f o E a O m a a N r- 0 a. Create traditional,formal, proportional, and rhythmic multilevel building masses to unify the public blocksca e a d b. Provide traditional,formal building masses designed to frame and enclose w the public streetscape(a, d, g,j). M a 0 c. Celebrate the street corner by increasing or articulating building mass, y using tower elements as "gatepost" architectural features (b). m w d. Distinguish buildings with a discernible base(c)and cap(a, d, e,f,)that to define the top and bottom of the structure. Use continuous building O elements, such as roof eaves(a,d, e, g), cornice elements (f, h), window 3 bands (b, d,f,g, h), and masonry foundation bases(c)to assure building C unity and blockscape continuity. a v a e. Rest the building on a wide discernible foundation base to anchor the LL building to the ground plane(c). f. Create visual rhythms with building masses that divide facades into r individual repetitive components. Segment buildings into individual =° elements using the following techniques: a c d • Vertical tower masses(b, e) E s • Horizontal repeating spandrels w • Consistent repetitive roof forms (a, d, e) 40 �ac�tet P9•. 6.E.g Cat n. , O E C d E d t ■: l< c t # W A � o N g. Distinguish individual floors using the following techniques: N c • Projecting horizontal cornice elements(f) '° • Decorative masonry belt courses(f) • Change in material pattern between floors(f) w h. Define individual units with subtle facade articulations. Use repetitive a elements such as structural bays(j), recessed loggias(g,j, 1),and m projecting balconies(k)to distinguish individual units. (n d i. Provide distinguishable recessed building entrances, oriented toward the t public street, as common building access points to internal-oriented U lobbies and vertical circulation elements(i). E E j. Generally center windows on the building mass,and align both c horizontally and vertically(a, b, d, e,f,g,h). a k. Express building mass by recessing window openings in building facades a LL minimum of 4 inches(a, b, d,f,g, h, g). E 1. Provide windows that are vertical in orientation(a, b, c,d,e,f,g, h, k). m. Integrate projecting balconies(k)and recessed loggias(g, 1)seamlessly a with the design of the building. Projecting balconies should be minimum 5 ft deep and recessed loggias should be a minimum of 6o square feet. E u m a 41 Packet Pg. 337 6.E.g 4) Live-Work Units.A live—work building is designed to accommodate both commercial o and residential uses within a single unit, commonly with retail ° z and office uses on the first floor C and upper floors dedicated to E residential use. v c W E Live-work units consist of: Q v 0 • Two to three-story building masses that frame and define the public U streetscape. • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape. a • Sidewalk-adjacent building masses accommodate ground—floor —o businesses. 0 • Ground floor businesses are accessed directly from the public street. Private residences are accessed from internal lock-outs or separate Ln street-oriented entrances. • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. C 0 2 Traditionally, live-work establishments were occupied by merchants or employees who lived directly above their place of business, enabling entrepreneurs to establish business in an economical fashion.With the w economic realities of today,this lifestyle concept is again gaining D M acceptance as a small business approach designed to provide goods and m services while promoting enhanced housing diversity. m ur •, r U a a. E d v LL C N E t G R r Q C d E t U A Q 42 TWe 1.338 The design guidelines include the following: a d o x �4 G Z E d E v c E Q w 0 4- U � Y C b c— e f d E LO 0 0 m 0 v N a. Provide multistory live-work building masses designed to frame and define o the public realm (a, d, g, b. Provide dual—unit entrance designed to accommodate both residents and 0: merchants. Provide direct storefront workspace access oriented toward w the public streetscape. Provide secondary upper-story access designed to IL accommodate residents (i). Ca v c. Design ground—floor live-work storefronts using traditional storefront v w heights to allow natural light to penetrate street-oriented display windows, illuminating storefront interiors (c, e,f). 0 Y d. Express the underlying structure of the building. Use a sequence of E storefront structural bays designed to convey how the building stands up d (c, e,f). a e. Provide a series of storefront structural bays, composed of repetitive a vertical columns/piers and horizontal spandrels designed to create a w consistent facade rhythm (c, e,f). E 0 M Y Y Q d E L V W Y_ Q 43 6.E.g S J= o N r O Z C E o c d E a 0 h i k 1 I d E CL 0 > o f. Distinguish higher-intensity building corners with tower elements N designed to resolve two converging street walls (h). C 0 N g. Provide upper-story private resident outdoor open space in the form of decks (i) and balconies(k). Private open space should be a minimum of loo W square feet. Balconies should be a minimum 5 ft in depth. W w IL IL h. Recess doors and windows into masonry and exterior plaster walls to express building mass. Minimum door and window recess should measure ai four inches(k). m w C i. Accommodate vehicles parking onsite by providing rear-oriented enclosed d v garages(1). E j. Live/work configurations include: C w • Live above work v a • Live within work U • Live behind work(attached) d • Live behind work(detached) E L U A Q w C d E U U A Q 44 6.E.g 5) Mixed-Use. Mixed use is defined by higher-intensity developments that include two \ o or more physically integrated uses on one site or within one Z structure, including combinations of retail, office, E institutional, residential, or other land uses. E d Mixed-use buildings consist of: $ 0 • Three to four-story building masses frame and define the public streetscape. o • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape. d • Sidewalk—adjacent building masses accommodate ground—floor o businesses. • Ground—floor businesses are accessed directly from the public street. Offices and private residences are accessed from internal lobbies and hallways. • Internally oriented underground, podium,or parking court are accessed from limited street portals. (v � Traditionally, mixed-use districts are designed as pedestrian-friendly w environments characterized by a variety of building typologies designed to a frame,enclose, and embrace the public realm. Because commercial, 0 m residential, and employment land uses are placed in such close proximity, w the needs of everyday life are easily accessible,while enhancing w alternative transportation modes such as walking and transit ridership. d U 0 E d Q LL � G UI E t U w Q C d E s 0 Q 45 Packet Pg. 441 6.E.g Design guidelines for mixed-use buildings include the following: d 0 N r ►►► Z C d � Ir E E t C E r N U alla E CL 0 d v m v a. Create traditional street walls composed of a storefront base, upper-story facade, and roof cap designed to frame and enclose the streetscape, N creating a pedestrian-friendly"Main Street'atmosphere(a, d,g,j). b. Differentiate individual building masses along the street wall with slight w indentations to enhance blockscape variety and visual interest(a,d,g). a ❑ c. Use similar structural bay and window rhythms to promote blockscape N continuity(j). d. Express the underlying structure of the building. Use a sequence of d structural bays designed to convey how the building stands up(a, d,g,j). U o e. Provide tower elements to accentuate and highlight building corners, E emphasizing higher intensity land uses(a, d, b). f. Use tower elements at corners as a transitional element that resolves two a converging street walls(a, b,d, g. Create visual rhythms with structural bays that divide buildings into E individual repetitive components(e). h. Provide a series of structural bays, composed of repetitive vertical a columns/piers and horizontal spandrels/arches designed to create a consistent facade rhythm(f, h). A i. Create visually distinct and substantial three-dimensional columns(i)and a piers(h). 46 Packet Pg. 342 6.E.g li N O Z C d E C d E O U c d E CL O m d 0 j. Promote human scale by creating a series of proportional structural bays LO that segment the building into individual components. Structural bay width typically ranges between 24-30 feet(h). N c k. Use traditional storefront heights to allow natural light to highlight display y windows, illuminating storefront interiors (e,f, h, 1). I. Design storefronts that are balanced,with symmetrical proportions w defined by structural bays, and characterized by storefront display M windows,transom windows, recessed doorways, bulkheads, sign bands, and awnings/canopies(e,f, h, 1). u00i v d m. Create substantial covered arcades capable of accommodating pedestrian w movements while sheltering patrons from the elements (i). v U O n. Provide substantial three-dimensional arches designed to express the E mass of the building(e,f, i, 1). c d o. Use columns to continue the plane of upper-story facades(i). a p. Design awnings to complement the structural framework of the building. LL Awnings should express the shape and proportion of structural bays and w window openings(1). E r U R q. Locate transom windows above storefront display windows to increase Q interior daylighting(e,f, k). m E r v a 47 Packet Pg. 343 6) office.An office building is a place available for the transaction of general business,administration,and research o and development functions typically not involving labor, manufacturing, z6 fabrication or retail sales. Z CD E Office buildings should generally be characterized by: E a • Three to four—story building masses $ that frame and define the public streetscape. • Building frontages are oriented toward the public streetscape, E sometimes accommodating covered arcades and colonnades. d • Buildings are accessed from a street-adjacent common entrance portal. o • Individual office units are accessed from internal lobbies and hallways. • Internally oriented courtyards are located above underground or r° podium parking. • Internally oriented underground, podium,or parking courts are accessed from limited street portals. Within traditional urban settings, office buildings become an integral element within the district mosaic, integrating seamlessly with other uses w to form a rich and diverse mixture.Traditionally, office buildings and a primarily building entrances,are located contiguous to the street, m designed to frame and enclose the public realm while accommodating parking within internal-oriented courtyards or parking structures. w T_ ) E NIP '1 - ■`� oil �. LL E r a E U U a 48 Packet Pg. 344 Design guidelines for office buildings include the following: a d ° N G Z C N E c d E a 0 U c ` E E a AWL 0 m v 0 6 •• v a. Create building masses reflecting a distinguishable base, shaft, and capital c (a, b, c, d,g, I)• o .N b. Rest the building on a distinguishable ground floor base or pedestal designed to anchor the building to the ground plane(g). w c. Provide ground floor arcades and recessed entries that shelter pedestrians IL from the elements(f, k). y d. Create a definable building shaft, designed as a transitional facade w element which links the building base and capital (h, i). U e. Crown the building with a discernible building capital, designed to S terminate the top of the structure(a, d E,g,j). � C f. Distinguish building corners by providing tower elements as landmark structures, designed to resolve two converging street walls (b). a LL g. Create structural bays that visibly display the underlying structure of the building(e,f, h). E L U h. Segment buildings into repetitive scale-giving elements composed of w columns/piers and spandrels/arches(e,f, h, i). a C m i. Create distinct and recognizable horizontal floor divisions. Use such E techniques as horizontal window bands, continuous cornice elements, masonry belt courses, and repetitive window lintels designed to distinguish individual floors (a, c, d, e,g, h, i, 49 Packet Pg.345 Ah IRV r N 0 Z Y c d E v c W E d h i 1 0 U d 3 E ! o am D W v j. Create visual rhythms with structural elements that divide facades into individual repetitive components. Building structures should be N segmented into simple symmetrical components based upon the following c facade rhythm standards: y v • Vertically repeating columns and piers(e,f, h, i). • Horizontal repeating spandrels(h, j) w • Vertically-oriented windows repeated in horizontal bands recessed a a minimum of four inches from the solid wall plane designed to express m building mass(e,g, h, i,j). y v d w k. Segment horizontal window openings with mullions into a series of m vertical oriented windows(e, h). c Y I. Provide traditional windows divided by muntins into a series of individual window panes (h). d v m. Define window opening with lintels, masonry belt courses, sills, and Q awnings(1). a Y C d n. Use traditional, small, and durable human-scaled masonry building E materials (c, d,j). A Y o. Provide a definable and prominent building entrance designed to signal egress(k). 4) d E M U M Y Q 50 #�Qiair�set�g.�`346 7) Building Materials.Traditional indigenous building materials promote community identity by promoting an identifiable architectural vision,firmly rooted in the vernacular of the region.Traditionally, building materials o such as brick and stone masonry are measured in human-scaled units. Because these materials are so commonplace, literally the building blocks o Z of a civilized society,they are easily discernible and readily understood. Traditional building materials help us understand and scale larger E buildings, ultimately connecting us to the built environment. d E a g d ¢ {y A � U o y to c m E Ln 9 d _ D v 0 °_�-- - ■ e, r m m a. Use durable and refined wall materials to project a traditional architectural m v image(a). w r b. Design buildings that use heavy, visually solid foundation materials (b, e) U that transition upward to lighter wall cladding and roof materials. E 0 c. Use durable and substantial foundation materials such as rusticated stone C (b), polished granite, and sandblasted concrete (c). v d. Provide human-scaled wall materials that are familiar in their dimensions a and can be repeated in understandable units (b, c). c m E e. Provide wall materials such as brick and stone masonry that help people interpret the size of a building(b, e). a f. Use traditional brick masonry dimensions(b, e). d E g. Use real, smooth,three-coat exterior plaster applications(a, c). Exterior plaster finishes should appear hand troweled,with slight surface © c variations(a, c). 51 Packet Pg. 347 g +i T 0 N T O 2 C E -o c ,. E E ¢ m h i k 1 0 U =& E 1 O. i O J * j 41 W Ln O h. Provide exterior plaster finishes that are not overly exaggerated or irregular such as Spanish Lace. N c i. Use metal cladding(such as corrugated metal)with discretion, primarily y for architectural accents and structural members(f, g,j). j. Use traditional gloss-glazed transparent tile with deep, rich colors for FU architectural accents. M IL k. Avoid large featureless wall surfaces, such as metal screens, unrelieved y stucco facades, and all-metal spandrel panels. v I. Provide material changes at a change in wall plane on an inside corner(f). r w L) m. Use durable metal roof materials that enhance the longevity of buildings, including copper, Corten steel, standing seam (i), and "V" seam. C n. Provide traditional straight-barrel mission tile roofs composed of clay or v concrete if tile is to be used (h). ¢ U_ o. Use rubber membrane materials for flat roofs only. E p. Define flat roofs with a substantial parapet wall capped with ornamental u coping designed to screen vents and mechanical equipment(k). q. Support roof eaves and rake overhangs with substantial dimensional m timber beams, rafter tails, brackets, and corbels(1). E r. Avoid nondurable roofing materials such as wood shingles(real or a cementitious)and composition roofing. 52 ,par 348 6.E. .. i9•t9A.140 Parking Design On-street parking lanes, parking structures, and rear parking courtyards are o dedicated to the temporary storage of vehicles.The intent is to reduce the N 1 physical and visual impact of vehicles,fostering a pedestrian atmosphere. z° Traditionally, parking garages were beautifully ornamented structures seamlessly E integrated into the fabric of the business district, having their own special typology designed to harmonize with their surroundings.Today, new innovative E solutions have been developed to soften the impact of vehicular storage, a including screening garages with commercial storefronts, underground parking, c and internal parking courts. c a d £ CL 0 m d 0 m v LON C O •N d 1,14 e f D a m IAR m r a. Locate parking structures internal to the site and screened from public view. Use street-oriented building masses and commercial storefronts to screen parking structures from the streetscape(a, b, c, d, e,f). E C C b. Provide ample parking structure identification signage designed to distinguish and highlight public parking garages(b, c). LL c. Design the facade of parking structures to mimic a traditional building composed of window openings and accruements intended to project a consistent streescape image(c, e). d. Use continuous horizontal elements, such as projecting cornice elements, a window bands, and brick courses consistent with adjacent building m facades (c). E u m e. Align parking structure facade walls with adjacent buildings to create a continuous street wall (e). 53 Packet Pg. 349 6.E.g 0 N r O Z c E E c v E Q d 0 0 U C d Id E me O d d �f N f. Promote on-street parking opportunities to slow traffic in district cores. Motorists must be alert and aware to navigate the traditional intimate N streetscape(g, h, i). g. Provide on-street parallel parking lanes designed to promote a traditional w "Main Street" image and physical buffer. Parallel parking lanes are D symbolic of traditional downtowns and provide a physical and psychological buffer between the street and pedestrian sidewalk(g). vmi d h. Provide on-street parallel parking lanes to accommodate short term convenience parking(g, h, i). d 0 L Provide diagonal parking stalls to encourage short-term convenience E parking opportunities,enhancing commerce(1). 'o C d j. Eliminate pedestrian/vehicular conflicts.Curb cuts should not occur along a storefront street walls.Curb cuts should only occur on side-alley-loaded LL blocks, providing alley access to internally oriented parking courts and c service areas. d E t k. Locate long-term on-site parking behind buildings,screened from public view(j, k). a 1. Design onsite parking areas as dual-usage courtyards to accommodate E vehicles as well as pedestrians. Provide amenities such as raised fountain m _. pedestals,tree bosques,and textured pavement treatments designed to a accommodate pedestrians(1). 54 Packet Pg. 3 00 ( m. Segment large parking areas into a series of small parking courts enclosed `�•► by buildings and framed by canopy trees designed to minimize the scale of the total parking area(j, k, 1). o N r n. Create internalized parking courts designed to accommodate long-term c parking opportunities. Design parking courts as dual-usage plazas Z intended to accommodate both vehicular and pedestrian activities. -o o. Surface parking lots adjacent to public streets should incorporate a d minimum 4 ft deep landscape buffer with trees and other plant material. a Where a landscape buffer is not feasible,a screen wall with decorative c detailing and/or landscaping should be provided. Screen walls should be U visually permeable and provide openings for pedestrian access. E c. ig.igA.15o Landscape Design —° d v A. Landscape Image.The San Bernardino Transit Overlay District landscape pattern is intended to project a formal impression designed to reinforce the LO transit village image,rooted in the landscape heritage of the region.This formal landscape pattern justifies itself through the use of consistent street N tree plantings which form tree-lined rows that frame and define the c streetscape while shading and sheltering pedestrians from the elements. .> Public urban open spaces, such as plazas and courtyards,formal tree plantings M create a framework outlining these public oriented amenities.Within TDs,the �_ landscape image is designed to reinforce a pedestrian dominated w environment that celebrates human culture rather than the automobile to create a sense of place while reinforcing the higher intensity nature of these transit nodes as commercial, residential and employment hubs of the community. w r d B. Landscape. Landscape design is intended to improve or ornament the physical c environment through the use of such elements as plant materials,water E features,and land forms,designed to modify the physical setting for aesthetic v' c purposes. v Street trees are an important asset to the streetscape,due to there functional a ability to modify the micro climate by providing summer shade,winter transparency(solar gain),while purifying the air. From a design standpoint, E trees can positively frame and enclose the streetscape, creating an enhanced pedestrian environment that defines the public realm;while formal orchard- w style tree grids soften parking fields. Q C d E L V 55 6.E.g I o N 0 Z C CD E AM C v r Q f v 1'w E Q. m 0 �o e a. Provide a consistent streetscape image through the use of formal canopy- " style street tree plantings that provide summer shade and winter o transparency(a,d). Mn b. Plant formal rows of street trees designed to frame and enclose the streetscape(a, d). w D c. Provide raised planters adjacent to light rail transit lines designed as a physical shield to guard pedestrians(b). m in v d. Use raised planters contiguous to higher capacity arterials, buffering w pedestrians from vehicles(c). 0 e. Provide individual groupings of plant containers(b)or raised planters along sidewalks with colorful flowering annuals and perennials(e,f). c m f. Use tree grates and guards to protect street tree root systems, reducing soil compaction. a LL g. Design landscape buffers adjacent to rear building elevations to soften building architecture while providing a landscaped transition between the E rear parking area and building. r a h. Use tress in grids designed to mimic orchard-style plants designed to provide a shady grove designed to shelter vehicles and motorists from elements(g, h). .o 56 Packet Pg. 352 G M N , r 0 ui Z N . _/ E d E L u�c;rr�u y — v h ----. k 1 v c r d E 0 Y 7 ) N i. Use tall columnar trees to frame and enclose parking fields creating a solid N backdrop that protects interior canopy-style orchard trees. o 2 j. Use tall columnar trees to segment large parking fields into a series of "outdoor rooms" breaking-up large expanses of pavement. 0: k. Use medians and islands to segment large parking fields creating variety D and visual interest while mimicking traditional orchard grids(h). m I. Provide landscape amenities including raised fountain pedestals,tree bosques, and enhanced paving designed to screen vehicles from public ?« view(f, g). v 0 m. Provide decorative and ornamental low parking field walls to screen vehicles from public view(k, 1). o C d n. Build seating into low screen walls designed to accommodate waiting transit riders(k). a LL o. Use native and drought tolerant plant materials to promote an indigenous landscape image. E U A p. Segment landscape areas into individual hydro zones designed to a conserve water by grouping similar plant materials with like water c requirements. " E r v 0 57 6:E.g 0 N r O Z C d E c d E Q d 0 O U c d E CL O d m 0 so v N c O .N d W IL IL t7 m v d w r v v O E v c m v Q LL C W E r v Q c d E r U Q r..r..P �;i: Appendix 0 Appendix B. Existing General Land Use Designation by Station Area Z Exhibits c d E Q m 0 O U c m E a O d m 0 �o v N c O .y > d W 7 IL 0 to U) v T d U O E a c d v Q LL C d E L V R t.' Q Y c d E L V A Q Addendum to San Bernardino General Plan Update EIR City of San Bernardino Packet Pg. 355 Appendix T This page intentionally left blank. ° N T O 2 C d E r c d E Q v v O U r c m E O. O v m 0 v T N C O .N j d It W a. a U m U) v d w r d U O E 'O C d Q LL C d E L U Q w C d E r U R r a The Planning Center January 2012 Packet Pg. 356 A Awl x • �yx. ��� - ���I 1111/� • ;ae,L.L.I �� !�j������I���� ��,�• I.;;.; .1111 ,. INI11 � by ��� � � � iii ���I ���� �I �• _: ' � •, _ 1 " � • ���� ON � . J '` ♦ Oq!- — __ __ � 111. ,,,,, • O L LLI O L� • � 11_ _ • � 11111 � — � 11 • 11 •• ,,,, � 1 • 11111 LIIII � • 1 1 � 11111— � • 1 / ���� 1 - 1111- = - 1 . 11 ■1 � �_ �� �,,���,, �� 11 '�1:11, a mn _ •�� �� �� �� ��� nn - iun � m ���� ���� • // � �111111 111 _:. - 11111 rJ4 ON OFF �� �C mill WHO rm 0*des.044A �1►����►�►►iii � � • i ■■■■ ■M ..■■ I■M EIM■■ �mmom .■Ii IN IN NINE C �� �� ■_ W�,����l1 �� C. 1■ - ��. 11111111 ■1■��� ��'��■ �� • ' '�■ � � �1■� �I'��� �` ■■11�■■ III ' ,RI MAN OPINION I • `1111 I�j/ ♦� _ __ � ��F, � , . . III...• �i//„ /� = � 1111.1 i 1- ■■ , i son MEN Legend \„'I I III■t►���,` -- __ ■C �_�_ C C - �III■ 111111111 ■11 111 �1111� CC _- C ■��� _ ■_ �■ __ __ __ __ :: t `*�� 1 11111�� 1111 _ ■- ■- _- �_ _� _ Z ME / �_ � !� t7 _� VIII -■ __ -_ _� __ _ - - _ - r -- _■ _ no _- � � , ..� 1111■IIIJII � 11111 CSI ■- � __ _ 1 r �� 1111■■ 1111 - R4 � -__ -___ -_- �_- -_- ■ 1 _ 11 �."' _ � ■■ Im, ■11111111111 Illh �� ■� - �� �� _ _C MISS .11111111 C. II == �� _° __= ■ -- - - -- -- IIIII - 111111111■ : �p p� __ ■■ ■■ •: _— -- - ��� ��11111� 111111111 11111 ■11: -.1=� • 10 i ii iii =■ __ ���11111111 IIIIIIIII 111111 = -" "' ' �� _ _ ■ ■= e= _- __ _i -- :1111111111 �- 111111. �IIf ■I- - _- _ _ __ -_ �_ ! t 11111- -11111111 - -- ■ _� ME Ell 11111- - - -I■III - -- -- -- -- - - 111111111 = = C■ = = -- ■___ �__ _� _ - IN 11111_ _I 111 �� __ -�� C■ a � - __ __- _- __- -_■ __ ____ _ - 1111 1. .1 1 � 11111 - __ 11111 �_ _=1=_ -� �- • • � 111111■I. � - _ = p • 11111 11111111 � � ■oil � �:',- � �=111 � � = - - - - Legend •• • • • CO RS RU CG-1 CR-2 IE RR Packet i ��� - �� I ��� �- .111111111111 �_ _■ �� �.■ -- -- -- 1 �� �� �� �- � ��� •� � � a _— —_ � . „ II —■ 11_ � = 111111111= __ —__ _� �: _� I ,__. 111111 B = 1111111 �_, � °- -= �: = •: == == _= :1111 : 111111��= 11 == =_ - =IIIIIIIIII == :I. -�• - :II ■ I . . 1 � �A■ _ �� S .1 111 ■- �- �_ _ 111 _ � 1 IIII = � • __ :,Igloo r flllllll II■111= _ 111 :_ � , �__ • ■_ :11 X11 III 11- __ __ 11 11111111 �IIIII 1. MOM 111 _ 11 1. _ -= 111 fllllllll ' X1111-' 11 = = _ 1 - X111 III : :1111111 . 111111.- 11 , Ili = T � „ 11111 III ■ 11111111 "11111111=�— 111 �_ _ � . 111 111111 I 1 111. -�IIIIII. 111 111111 'LII -i -- --- - - IIIIIIII 1111- 11 p -� -- - - -- 1011111 - 11111111 fllllllll l = n 1 1 I ■ 111111111 1 � �� '� 111 : -_ ■ - -- _ 111111111 11111= � - - _ M■ 111 ■ - --_ - 1"""" • "'°= fIIIIIIII Illlllli —;_ __ = i1i � ii 111111111 11111. - 111111111 � 11111= llllllll 1111111111 • = == = 1111 it 111111111 1"' ° � 11111 11111111 = • - illi = 111 III 1111111 IIIIIIIIII nl =_ in ► ,u Iii nnnnn Illllllr �4r1m n == 111 ®• Ip �111111� �Illi� ' . 111 =�' .11 -- Illlirp 1 unmi�I ale Jnnnn nn■, _ _ mm" 11111111 111111lti1� 111111111111 No MEN I ►p► nn■n■■ Illllllir Hirtlll _ f ► ► ... 111 = 111 ' _� - I 1 11111111 1111111_ 11 11 1111111 MEN 1 1 11111��� �I■1■= �— _® =111111 � ■1■�1�1 ' _ _ _ ME SEE® . m ■ ME __ �� �;� , 111 � . • - ■— ` _= p — 11111 _ 111111' 111111- MEN m i li- 11111111 111111 =.111 111 1_ =111111= _11111 '� ®0111111■ ' 'll • 111111 . ■III■1 I 1 ■� �111111� o moll M MEN 111111' 11111 11 III_ 11111 - = 1111: := Jam = � - = .111111 = 1111 ' I 1 = =1111 � ■IIIIIIIII Milk 1111'_ =111111 � 1 n ■11111111 11111111 ' I ° 111_ II 11 : 11111: -■ 11. .11 111= ='ICI! —. 111 111111■ 111 ZWK Ei MEN — � ■ 1■— WOMEN 0 1 u_ .__... Illf�® iilllll ?I � � i '�11■ - ® .-_ .... 111= 111111 111111 III _II 111111 ill - 111111Nil: =1111111111 rt 11111° I11� I-1111 • Ills �� IIII: :111111111 111_1 11 111111111111111111 II � 111111 11111111111 II _li 11111111111 11 : 1111111111111 - � � E .•m m. . .'��, ' il,■■r.. _ a well° • - � • ■ 1111111111 i iin°iini - ���; \�MMM<, °\,;� - - : //4 %% er ■ ■ FM 1/ 1 l C entral- nei, mom a. in C — �` �� ■ ■ E A 6:E.g E ent r i o :. w 3 E N ❑ 2 i0 N c C E C d E Macka w 0 0 U c E V nderbil N Fairway Ln L �7 r C Ln E H pitalit Hospitalit H o E 0 d U 0 m y w iL a 0 m a Redlands ' d r d �t Oliver- c U tee Holm= U � Caroline R v Caroline Clu Center N ) _ m a Coole°ole _ '� LL c d Legend e L U A <all other values> ® RM ® CG-2 — CR-3 — CALMAT _ PP a ROW - RMH 20 . w, CG-3 CR-4 �Q, UBP-1 — OS E RE - RMH ;,M' CCS-1 �Q, CH 4,M' CCS-2 PCR R — RH UBP-2 — OIP PFC ¢ RL-3.5 - RSH UBP-3 IL — PF RS 7. `" - " CO CR-1 ® I W11, CCS-3 RU - CG-1 CR-2 — IE RR Pack ' ,366 m� c ,. 0 c 0 0 4 V C-4 i - i E E cis Hardt reiw °c i N `o E d Brier G u 4) D vid: a 0 i d a sp 0 E t N italitr Coul: (D i Vander ilt tia�� 3 eQ LO �o N C O r urelw i •4 HosPitaiity H rriman _` R�sewood m MU ki a r, m m v m ® d Redartft U m o E mr, ", m °c rol > c v m` m �l Q lQ N 91 LL C d Legend E E U A <all other values> RM ® CG-2 — CR-3 — CALMAT - PP a ROW ® RMH-20 CG-3 CR-4 ��� UBP-1 — OS E RE - RMH CCS-1 CHNLA CCS-2 PCR m RL _ RH UBP-2 — OIP PFC a RL-3.5 — RSH UBP-3 IL — PF RS :_ f CO CR-1 - I CCS-3 RU — CG-1 CR-2 M IE RRpetPg 36T' 6.E.g O�an9eShow IVVIWV'VI Ii San Bernardino m 0 c as I as d + u Y a °Itllll:, w i= a c N Z a; v victoria £ C d E a Hardt Laurelwood Laurelwood Hardt c D U Brier d E 0 Gc Davidson ° ui v in Carne9ie N°spitality Coulst n c° A N m o boy Ea�T.: o : : Lee ale — > y m Sycamore 5 :R v L urelwo w d ° t a a U � H rriman p F R N m d 'r= d U O ® c E Bedlan.d e`� y-o All KT c o� Q t o UN p rt ¢ Leota z a c m Legend E <all other values> - RM - CG-2 - CR-3 - CALMAT _ PP a Y ROW — RMH-20 - CG-3 ��� CR-4 ,IZ UBPA M OS E RE - RMH _ CCS-1 ��0 CH WNN CCS-2 PCR «_ RL — RH - UBP-2 _ OIP PFC a RL-3.5 _ RSH UBP-3 IL P RS = CO CRA — IH �� � CCS-3 RU - CG-1 M CR-2 ® IE RR ' Fapket Pg.368 �- 11 e� 2 MAL a ®I■■ lo zz XNI it { O� \\ \ \ II'1"I ii! /// /.//• //// %/%%% iii/i� ZZ / • 6.E.h ATTACHMENT G 0 N Changes to Existing Zonin g with TD Code ° z Standard Current Code TOD Overlay No minimum front setback;Maximum front setback d Front Setbacks minimum front setback of 0-20 ft. of 15-25 feet,depending on the station area type Building height 30-100 ft max,depending on the 8 type Q base zone 30-100 ft max,depending on the station area e Upper floor step-back No requirement 8 ft minimum for all station area types except for Kendall Neighborhood V Minimum building None 50—80%depending on the station area type presence E Required ground floor o a None 50-75 /o depending on the station area type o fagade transparency m Entrance orientation m None Front door facing public frontage line requirement Minimum first floor v None 15 feet ceiling height for buildings Minimum Lot Size 10,000 for new commercial or industrial subdivisions None O_ 50%— 100%, depending on the base None N Maximum Lot coverage zone 4) Convenience stores pursuant to Section 19.06.025.(new to zones CO,CR-1,2,3,CH, and CCS-I.No longer conditional for CG-1,2,3) O Auto parts sales(in same) U Auto repair(in some) Dry cleaners(new to CCS-1) p Car, RV, and truck sales (in Educational services(new to CO,CG-3,CR-2,3, CH,and CCS-1.no longer conditional to CG- some) 1,2) 3 Car Washes(in some) rn Service Stations(in some) Medical/care facilities/social services(within G Service Commercial uses CCS-1 only)(new to CCS-1) O Mixed-use N pursuant to Table 06.01 l., excluding veterinary services(in o MU excluding res(new[o CG-1,2,3,CR-1,3,CH,and C CS- a Permitted Land Uses some) 1 w Impound vehicle storage yard(in o MU comet.&res(new to CO, 0 some) Vehicle leasing/rental (in some) CG-1,CR-I,3,CH,and CCS-1, 0 RV parks (in some) no longer conditional to CG-2,3, Blood banks(in some) and CR-2) s Drive-duv commercial uses Mobile vendors(not mentioned in general V Restaurants with drive-thm (in standards'applicable to main street overlay district) some) Neighborhood grocery stores(new to CO,CR- m • Nurseries(in some) E 1,3,and CCS-1.no longer conditional to CG- t Dry cleaners(in some) 1,2,3,CR-2,and CH) m Parking structures(new to CG-1,2,3,CH,CCS- Q 1,and possibly CO) • Smoke Shop Auto parts sales E Single-price Overstock/Discount Auto repair z Prohibited v �1 Store Car,RV,and truck sales [ j Tattoo Parlor/Piercing Studio Car Washes fir/ Q Packet Pg. 370 6.E.h ( Standard Current Code TOD Overlay SecondhandTfhrift Store Service Stations c • Check-cashing,Cash Advance, Service Commercial uses pursuant to Table N loan facilities 06.01 J.,excluding veterinary services Pawn shop o Automotive stereo shop Impound vehicle storage yard Z • Tire store Vehicle leasing/rental • Self-service laundry RV parks E Recycling center Blood banks C • Party supply store Drive-thru commercial uses m Medical marijuana dispensary Restaurants with drive-thm Q • Convenience store Nurseries v • Dry cleaners(in some) o Educational services(in some) U Medical/care facilities/social 4) m services(in some) E • Mixed-use(in some) p • Mobile vendors(not mentioned) m • Neighborhood grocery stores(in d O some) • Parking structures(in some v New setbacks,step-back,commercial service Residential Transition -- None location and screening,noise generating activities Standards (Section 19.19A.070) c Reduced on-site parking requirements for specific 0 Parking Zoning Ordinance Section 19.24 uses,and other new standards in Section 19.19.A.080 h New standards for block length and street O Subdivision Standards connectivity y New advisory design guidelines(Section v Design Guidelines t j 19.19A.I00) O H S 3 rn Current CG-1 CG-2 CG-3 CO CR-1 t47du/ac* CR-3 CCS-1 CH E Code c 0 N Residential 12-47du/ac* 47du/ac*Density 21du/ac** ys N c) x w Front 10 10 15 15 0 15 20 10 Setbacks Building 30ft/2st 30tt/2st 30ft/2st 30-52ft/2-4st 52ft/4 52ft/4st 30ft/2st 45ft/na height 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.7 1.0 1 0.7 U *Senior citizen and senior congregate care housing only **Bonus density of up to 50%for senior citizen and senior congregate care housing only ***Senior citizen and senior congregate care housing shall permit up to 130 du/ac(by CUP) d 'Non-Residential Intensity—3.0 FAR(4.0 FAR if vertical mixed use project)Residential Density—54 dwelling units per acre. E a 0.7 FAR commercial,3.0 FAR Hotels&Offices,1.5 FAR R&D v 3 10,000 square feet minimum lot size �°• Q c Q) E L © U Q Packet Pg. 371 6.E.i City of San Bernardino NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino will hold a public hearing on Wednesday,January 18,2012 at 6:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers,City Hall,300 North"D"Street,San Bernardino, o California 92418,on the following proposed ordinance(s)to amend the City of San Bernardino Municipal(Development) w Code: o Z DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO.12-01-A proposal to amend Article I-General Provisions,Section 19.02.060,Establishment of Land Use Zoning Districts to add Transit Overlay District(TD)and amend Article I1-Land E Use Zoning Districts, to add Section 19.19A Transit Overlay District to the Development Code to add development m standards and design guidelines. E a The City has prepared a regulatory framework for Transit-Oriented Development(TOD)in the form of a Transit Overlay District(TD)to incentivize and facilitate new development and redevelopment around the forthcoming bus rapid transit 0 (BRT)stations. In total,the TD covers 13 sbX(San Bernardino Express Bus)station areas in the City as envisioned under the sbX BRT Project. Each of the Transit Overlay District Area Types may be viewed at the City's Transit E Oriented Development webpage: 0- 0 hup.' rr 'i an hernardint cj i-eirchall'•omrnunit% derdnpmenrplannin¢ltrapjt ,, •ni ddevelopment Imdl.a,p m The City has developed a set of zoning regulations for the station areas and surrounding areas that fall within the o designated district.The regulations are accompanied by a set of development standards and design guidelines that are v flexible enough to allow property owners and developers to express their vision while maintaining a consistency man form to encourage an attractive multi-modal atmosphere.The TD zoning regulations would apply to the establishment of all new structures and uses within the boundaries of the 13 sbX station areas. The City would maintain the existing land use and zoning designations of the affected parcels in place under the proposed 0 project. New development standards includes,but not limited to new public frontage line setback requirement to allow buildings to be placed closer to street frontage with parking at the rear of the site;building heights set from two to four stories with upper story step-back requirements;building ground floor transparency percentage requirements added; rn building entrance orientation requirements set for building's main entrance to face Kendall Drive and E Street frontages; residential transition standards when projects are adjacent to single-family residential; reduced on-site parking requirements;bicycle parking space requirements;subdivision standards reducing street block length to 400 feet;and x general design guidelines with residential and commercial site planning, architectural design and parking design requirements. a w 0 m U Proposed by: City of San Bernardino 6 Environmental Recommendation: Addendum to 2005 San Bernardino General Plan Environmental Impact Report - z CEQA Section 15164 = The public is welcome to speak at the public hearing or to submit written comments prior to the hearing.The Planning Commission will make recommendations to the Mayor and Common Council for final action on Development Code E Amendments.For more information,please contact the Planning Division of the Community Development Department at City Hall,or by phone at(909)384-5057. If you challenge the final action of the Mayor and Common Council in court, Q you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or by written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division at or prior to the public hearing. v E r U Submitted: January 4,2012 Q Publish: January 7,2012(minimum 118 Page Ad) Please send first proof for verification or changes by e-mail to Melissa Thurman: thurman mew)shcitv.ore. Please reference"PC Display Ad"on the billing and send to the City of San Bernardino,Planning Division, 300 North"D" Street,San Bernardino,CA 92418. Packet Pg. 772 6.E.j 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING N Notice is hereby given that the Mayor and Common council of the City of San Bernardino will hold a public hearing on Monday,February 6,2012,at 4:00 p.m.or 6 thereafter in the Council Chambers,City Hall.300 North'D"Street,San Bernardino, California 92418,on the following item: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO 12-01 -A proposal to amend Article I E -General Provisions,Section 19.02.060,Establishment of Land Use Zoning Districts D to add Transit Overlay District(TO)and amend Article II-Land Use Zoning Districts, y to add Section 19.19A Transit Overlay District to the Development Code to add E development standards and design guidelines. Q The City has prepared a regulatory framework for Transit-Onented Development v (TOD)in the form of a Transit Overlay District(TD)to incentivize and facilitate new 0 development and redevelopment around the forthcoming bus rapid transit (BHT) stations.In total,the TO covers 13 sbX(San Bernardino Express Bus)station areas in the City as envisioned under the sbX BRT Project.Each of the Transit Overlay District dr Area Types may be viewed at the City's Transit Oriented Development webpage: E http:ilw .ci.san-0 emardino.ca.uslcityhalUcommunity-developmenUplanningl o transit oriented development_(tod).asp The City has developed a setof zoning regulations forthe station areas and surrounding d areas that fall within the designated district. The regulations are accompanied by d a set of development standards and design guidelines that are flexible enough to Cl allow property owners and developers to express their vision while maintaining a - consistency in urban form to encourage an attractive multi-modal atmosphere.The Cc, TO zoning regulations would apply to the establishment of all new structures and uses N within the boundaries of the 13 sbX station areas. The City would maintain the existing land use and zoning designations of the affected parcels in place under the proposed project. New development standards includes, but not limited to new public frontage line setback requirement to allow buildings to be placed closer to street frontage with parking at the rear of the site; O building heights set from two to four stories with upper story step-back requirements; •y building ground floor transparency percentage requirements added;building entrance orientation requirements set for building's main entrance to face Kendall Drive and at E Street frontages; residential transition standards when projects are adjacent to of single-family residential;reduced on-site parking requirements;bicycle parking space requirements; subdivision standards reducing street block length to 400 feet; and general design guidelines with residential and commercial site planning,architectural - design and parking design requirements. a) Proposed by City of San Bernardino = Environmental Recommendation:Addendum to 2005 San Bemardino General Plan V Environmental Impact Report-CEOA Section 15164 The City of San Bernardino welcomes your participation in evaluating this item.The D• Mayor and Common Council will review the proposal and will consider the proposed p environmental determination in making a decision.The public is welcome to speak y at the public hearing or to submit written comments prior to the hearing For more information,please contact the Community Development Department at City Hall,or by phone at(909)364-5057. Z If you challenge the resultant action of the Mayor and Common Council in court,you _ may be limited to relsing only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City y Planning Division at,or prior to,the public hearing. E L Submitted:January 19,2012 sBWn47332 R Q C d 2 Col. 4.146" x 6.5" SAN BERNARDINO SUN a Packet Pg. 373 Aron Liang From: Melissa Thurman Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:02 PM To: Aron Liang Subject: FW: Confirmation: SBS#2247332 -SAN BERNARDINO SUN Attachments: SBS#2247332.pdf 0 N Importance: High 6 z For the MCC hearing on Feb. 6t°. See attachment for actual ad. E C Melissa Thurman d E Executive Assistant Q Community Development c City of San Bernardino c) 300 N. `D' St . d San Bernardino, CA 92418 E CL 909 . 384 . 5057 Ext . 3344 m sbcit . or _ _Y_ --� o facebook. com/sbcitygov LO v From: Glenda Sobrique (mailto:Glenda_Sobrique @dailyjournal,com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:53 AM To: Melissa Thurman Subject: Confirmation: SBS#2247332 - SAN BERNARDINO SUN °- y Importance: High Dear Customer: c M A The order listed below has been received and processed. If you have any questions regarding this order, x(D please contact your ad coordinator or the phone number listed below. a Customer Account Number: 119945 0 Type of Notice : GPNSB- GOVERNMENT PUBLIC NOTICE-SB u Ad Description : 1/8-Page Display Ad z Our Order Number : 2247332 _ Newspaper :SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUN Publication Date(s) : 01/25/2012 E U R Q w C Thank you for usingthe Daily Journal Corporation. w E r v m Glenda Sobrique 9 Q Ad Coordinator Government Advertising California Newspaper Service Bureau Direct:(213)229-5532 Toll Free:(800) 788-7840 Ext 5532 1 `"Pa ,Pg.374 6.E.j Fax: (800)474-9444 Email:Glenda sobriaue@dailviournal.com 0 N r O Z c N E -o c d E Q m 0 0 U Y C Q� E Q O d d C Q .y .j d m C R CD 2 U M 3 IL w 0 m U O Z C d E M U A Q w C d E L U A Q Packet Pg. 775 ATTACHMEN 6.E.k © 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (DEVELOPMENT CODE) SECTION 19.02.060(1), 4 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS, TO ADD THE TRANSIT OVERLAY DISTRICT (TD) AND ADDING CHAPTER 19.19A TO ESTABLISH THE TRANSIT o 5 OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES. d 6 2 c 7 SECTION 1. Recitals. v c 8 E .4 9 WHEREAS, on March 16, 2009, Resolution No. 2009-60 was adopted by the Mayor and 0 10 Common Council which authorized the submittal of a Caltrans Community-Based Transportation 2 c I I Planning (CBTP) application for the development of a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay E0 0 0 12 District; and CD 13 WHEREAS, on October 22, 2009, Resolution No. 2009-342 was adopted by the Mayor and °• m a 14 Common Council which approved a contract with Caltrans accepting funding for planning and © 15 implementation of transit-oriented development; and c 0 16 WHEREAS, On September 7, 2011, Resolution No. 2010-50 was adopted by the Community .N d 17 Development Commission (CDC), authorizing the Interim Executive Director of the Redevelopment x 18 Agency to execute a Professional Services Agreement between the Agency and The Planning Center to 2 m 19 provide consultant services for the preparation of the TOD District for the City; and c m c 20 WHEREAS, on June 15 and 16, 2011, community open house meetings were held where a total v O 21 of 57 community members participated in the two open house meetings; and 22 WHEREAS, on September 29, October 24, November 9 and 17, 2011, and May 24 and June 7, c d E r 23 2012, the Community Development Department's Planning Division held neighborhood meetings in an A x 24 effort to contact property and business owners around the bus rapid transit stops to receive public a c 25 comments about the City's planning efforts around the approved bus rapid transit corridors. E r 0 26 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on January 18, 2012, a 27 in order to receive public testimony and written and oral comments on Development Code Amendment 28 DCA No. 12-01, and fully reviewed and considered the Planning Division Staff Report and Addendum © to the Certified City of San Bernardino General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR 1 Packet P: . 6 6.E.k O1 SCH#2004000032 and recommended approval of Development Code Amendment DCA No. 12-01 to 2 the Mayor and Common Council; and 3 WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public hearing on February 6, June 4 18, and July 2, 2012, and fully reviewed and considered Development Code Amendment DCA No. 12- 0 5 01, Planning Commission recommendation and the Planning Division Staff Report. N 0 6 Z NOW THEREFORE,THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN 7 BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: E r c 8 m E 9 SECTION 2. The Mayor and Common Council find that the above-stated Recitals are true and d v hereby adopt and incorporate them herein. c0 10 c j m 11 SECTION 3. Findings of Fact: The Mayor and Common Council herby adopts the following c 12 Findings of Fact: d 0 13 1. Development Code Amendment DCA No. 12-01 is consistent with the General Plan of the ® 14 City of San Bernardino. DCA No. 12-01 will amend the Development Code Section 19.02.060(1), 15 Establishment of Zoning Districts, to add the Transit Overlay District (TD) and will add Chapter c 16 19.19A to establish the Transit Overlay District Development Standards and Design Guidelines, 5 m 17 consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies: m is Policy 2.4.6: "Work with Omnitrans to explore initiatives that promote redevelopment near o m 19 transit stops in order to encourage transit ridership, reduce vehicular trips, improve air quality, and R c 20 improve traffic congestion." . a 0 21 Goal 6.6: "Promote a network of multi-modal transportation facilities that are safe, efficient, and c 22 connected to various points of the City and the region." £ E 23 Policy 6.6.1: "Support the efforts of regional, state and federal agencies to provide additional om 24 local and express bus service in the City." W 25 Policy 6.6.2: "Create a partnership with Omnitrans to identify public transportation infrastructure E m 26 needs that improve mobility. 27 O za 2 [ i i Policy 6.6.3: "In cooperation with Omnitrans, require new development to provide transit �•/ 2 facilities, such as bus shelters and turnouts, as necessary and warranted by the scale of the 3 development." 4 Policy 6.6.4: "Ensure accessibility to public transportation for seniors and persons with R 5 disabilities. 6 6 Policy 6.6.5: "In cooperation with Omnitrans, explore methods to improve the use, speed, and ? c d 7 efficiency for transit services." E c 8 Policy 6.6.6: "Support and encourage the provision of a range of paratransit opportunities to E 9 complement bus and rail service for specialized transit needs." c to Policy 6.6.10: "Consider the provision of incentives, such as reduced parking standards and d 11 density/intensity bonuses, to those projects near transit stops that include transit-friendly uses such as c 0 12 child care, convenience retail and housing. > 0 13 Policy 6.7.2: "Coordinate with SANBAG, SCAG, the County and other regional, state or federal (o v 14 agencies and the railroads regarding plans for the provision of passenger, commuter, and high-speed rail O 15 service. 0 0 16 2. Development Code Amendment DCA No. 12-01 will not be detrimental to the public interest, d 17 health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City, because it will assist in improving economic mobility x 18 from new transit service, improve air quality by reducing automobile trips and their carbon emissions, o 19 increase housing choices, assist in the affordability of housing, and provide walking and biking health �o 20 benefits for residents throughout the City that will promote public health and safety. The proposed 21 transit overlay district would bring many benefits and convenient community life for residents and the City. Therefore, Development Code Amendment DCA No. 12-01 serves the public interest and m zz convenience and would not be detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare. 23 x Q 24 SECTION 4. Addendum to Certified San Bernardino General Plan Undated and Associated d 25 Specific Plans EIR SCH#2004111132: The Mayor and Common Council finds that Development Code i 0 26 Amendment DCA No. 12-01 will have no significant adverse effects on the environment beyond those 27 impacts identified in the General Plan Updated and Associated Specific Plans EIR SCH#2004111132, zs and therefore a Subsequent or Supplemental Environmental Impact Report is not required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in Public Resources Code Section 21166; and the 3 1 proposed Addendum (including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan) to the General Plan 2 Updated and Associated Specific Plans EIR SCH#2004111132 is hereby adopted. 3 4 SECTION 5. This Ordinance is based upon the Recitals and findings set forth above, and the 5 accompanying Staff Report and its attachments to this Ordinance, and is adopted pursuant to the N authority granted to the City of San Bernardino in Article 11, Section 7 of the California Constitution, z6 6 .. and Section 40(z) of the Charter of the City of San Bernardino. d 7 E v c 8 SECTION 6. Amendment of Development Code: Section 19.02.060(1), Establishment of 9 Zoning Districts, is hereby amended to add the Transit Overlay District (TD); and Chapter 19.19A, 10 Transit Overlay District Development Standards and Design Guidelines, is hereby added as shown in U c 11 Attachment 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. CL 0 12 SECTION 7. Notice of Determination: The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice d 0 13 of Determination with the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's compliance with the Ln a 14 California Environmental Quality Act. 15 tO c 0 16 SECTION 8. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase 'm 17 in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective cc 18 by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the 2 remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof The Mayor and Common Council hereby u 19 c declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more c 20 v subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or O 21 4 ineffective. c 22 E t U 23 24 25 E r v 0 26 Q 27 28 4 Packet Pg. 379 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SAN �•+ 2 BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (DEVELOPMENT CODE) SECTION 19.02.060(1), ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS, TO ADD THE TRANSIT OVERLAY 3 DISTRICT (TD) AND ADDING CHAPTER 19.19A TO ESTABLISH THE TRANSIT OVERLAY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES. a s I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and N 6 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the day z° c v 7 of , 2012,by the following vote to wit: E i s Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT a 9 0 )I 10 MARQUEZ it t t JENKINS E E 0 0 d 12 VALDIVIA o 13 SHORETT v 14 KELLEY 1s D G O 16 JOHNSON Ln d 17 MC CAMMACK w A as o d U tv Georgeann Hanna, City Clerk 0 20 0 21 The foregoing Ordinance is hereby approved this day of 2012. c 22 E t u 23 m a 24 PATRICK J. MORRIS,Mayor zs City of San Bernardino E Approved as to form: 26 Q JAMES F. PENMAN 27 City Attorney za By: 5 Packet P9 8.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 San Bernardino Development Code E d June, 2012 DRAFT a m 0 0 U Y Article 1- General Provisions 0. 19.02.o6o ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND USE ZONING DISTRICTS d 0 Transit Overlay District(TD) Ln v N Article 2- Land Use Zoning Districts o 2 19.19A — Transit Overlay District (TD) N Sections o� 19.19A.olo Purpose 0 19.19A.o2o Applicability m 19.19A.03o Transit Station Area Types d 19.19A.04o General Provisions d Y 19.19A.05o Building Form and Placement Standards o C 19.19A.o6o Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses d� v c 19.19A.070 Residential Transition Standards c n 19.19A.o8o Parking 0 a m 19.19A.o90 Subdivision Standards 0 G19.19A.1oo Design Guidelines M G19.19A.110 District Image m 0 G19.19A.12o Transit Oriented Design d G19.19A.130 Site Planning and Architectural Design m Y G19.19A.140 Parking Design c G19.19A.15o Landscape Design d E r 0 Y Y 1 Q Packet P'ji381 ATTACHMENT 1 c 19•t9A.o10 Purpose E The Transit Overlay District(TD)and its regulations are established in order to E implement the City's General Plan policies promoting transit-oriented development d within San Bernardino.The intent of the TD is to allow and encourage an appropriate 0 mix and intensity of land uses in a compact pattern around transit stations that will t foster transit usage,create new opportunities for economic growth,encourage inf ill E and redevelopment, reduce dependency on the automobile, improve air quality, and c promote high quality, interactive neighborhoods.The regulations and guidelines of this chapter are based upon the following transit-oriented development area o principles, consistent with the California Transit Village Development Planning Act of v 1994: r t. An attractive transit station with surrounding pedestrian amenities as the focus of the transit-oriented development area. 4 N z. An appropriate mix and intensity of uses such as office, retail, entertainment, � residential,and recreational facilities that support transit use and are designed for N convenient access by transit riders, pedestrians, and bicyclists. o, 3. Inviting and pedestrian-focused open spaces on both public and private c properties, such as smaller public pocket parks, civic plazas, outdoor dining areas, H Q common greens, and other types of urban spaces. > c 4. A walkable and bikeable area with pleasant connections linking transit stations with businesses and neighborhoods. v M 5. An interconnected street and non-vehicular network where walkways, bikeways, CL landscaping, and other streetscape amenities receive priority. d t9•t9A.02o Applicability c a The Transit Overlay District(TD)applies to transit station areas within San p Bernardino.The TD establishes standards and regulations beyond those required by R the underlying base zones.Whenever the requirement of the TD conflicts with the underlying base zone, the requirement of the TD shall govern. o 0 As transit service is expanded within San Bernardino,additional areas may be designated as TD within the city.TD boundaries may also be expanded over time as o development becomes more transit oriented. Boundary adjustments within a half mile of a transit station may be proposed by an applicant and approved at the discretion of the Community Development Director.The boundaries for each station area are established below, as shown in Figures t to 13. a The TD standards apply to the establishment of all new structures and uses within the boundaries of the TD. Existing structures and uses those are inconsistent with the E v Y 2 a Packet Pg. 3S2 ATTACHMENT 1 Y TD standards may be maintained, repaired, altered, and expanded only as allowed by E Chapter 19.62 (Nonconforming Structures and Uses). CD E Figure t. Kendall Drive and Palm Avenue Transit Station Area a Ur$ E d / 1 � E ' Aera S dry p C N d d' ?� N r C6 4f, CI ps O ♦♦ �, hdn�P ' A U d m CL 7 Z, U R C .0 Transit Station R •• Build-to Line > (see section 19.19A.040) F Z= m D r Y C d E t V Y_ Q E V m 3 a 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 C Figure z. Kendall Drive and Little Mountain Drive Transit Station Area E v � E d a ao U ap°Oy d E t-4, m n ` 0. POs i ao m o O �'.: ;.Shoo ♦` � ' _ ... r aq alle N 11 r klt Oa � " O JI 04 9 1 c; r _ =1 � — O V V a5 d U a i d as 13 ( Q 71 m v Transit Station. c •• Build-toLine 'o (see sec tion1g.19A.040) „o,roeuu O T 1 L d 7 O 0 F- L D r C d E U i V I a7 1 Q r c L � w E o A 4 C Packet Pg. 384 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 Q Figure 3.Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills Drive Transit Station Area E a � E Q 0 0 U _ d E O 3. r > Q LO LO c Z m *�. s O c m d U v M R d V Transit Station L •� -,Build- nej. - 'o \ �Ssee se_ct(on 1.9.19A.04DY «o.wW O T m 'C d O a F_ V m D c m E r U m >r Q c c O E U m 5 Q g. 385 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 n Figure 4. E Street and Marshall Boulevard Transit Station Area E w c E CL Q ? U C U L. �T > ®. .._.._.. F— h o .: 4u a5 " I •Wa � �� Rush I L, t 35th - - - • ra! + 34th Be I � r, 33rd 1 � _ a 2 ® O�r MdfShdll y PP `I u 3151 '7 1 — is Iz— , w 7i 30th 1 Is r E ®® Ekk C � ,6rk ® M M E®� ® T N 0 F t6 O C d E L U Q G © N E U 16 6 a PacketPg. 386 { ATTACHMENT 1 © Figure 5. E Street and Highland Avenue Transit Station Area E r ` � m ® J a Walla E 28th d O Alexander u, a n 27th 26th Courtiand 26th CouNand w --- .4 O. O 26th = _ 25th > > 25th 25th 25111 > ❑ 24th I m i 24th 24111 w a 23rd i I N Highland L—————— H land _1 9 ,.'+L.�J.'�a."� 1L"'. d C O 21st 16 a Ztst ' 21st L a > 20th r 20th' r 21St a N 20th a Campus i 20th 0 v r 19th L. i 19th 191h ;_ 1OI o lam O I .. i 18th iJ x. i7 m c L 3 = m .� '��. nm nth nth L - ° !11 L:11 L l , p 16th 16th m--.. � {� a Evans =I 15th a - ® ®® Transit Station 17TR1T(a Build to Line L j1•j„ (see section 19.18A.0401 O T R L d > 0 A L r V C d E 0 L U A Q r d L U tD 7 Q 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 Figure 6. E Street and Baseline Avenue Transit Station Area E c 77th L 17th LLL'J�� Lll[ 7th 'll I'jl}wm ,nn a _ � d- Im Z. I Tth r m ti EL Evans J 15th a 15th E 1 5 Magnolia i L' Magnolia Magnolia G _. y Wes- 14th > m '� 0 1 w d {gyp L " rn 14th LV Wabash 10 ti r. a 1 1 ° C s a O 1 1 d +^ Iola .H fzrl Baseline 1,�.�, �} mrt�t�1 , Baseline T x J . Orange '= 1 Orange o � IL 7t 1 � J r ,l,%---' 11th a 1 11th - � t0 1 m f�fitft F 1 Olive i Olive t O 7 .Olive •- . . 10th PC E u 1 mple Temple 1 i° .0 i° a � Union j I,_ A I y ® r� Tran t StetionF=-, A Line. C ® � Build t0 Line. (see a0etlOn 19.19A.040)- eoiro 0 w�i� Q >. as L d 0 Q �V F V C d E L U W M r a V C O E v m 8 a 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 c Figure 7. University Avenue and North Parkway Transit Station Area E owl" E a �ao9& Q 0�b�g O M t_ Qct L CL 0 d d 0 .00 ; California State University of San 8erna rdino ISO N O W � �♦ �� '` r aote �' Ci Pe n ���n.+•�'� .2 L 11aRainier > N .Larva sa/ Joje to aka/ fro gyp �� °na d 7e a U a ob oay �o y c -O °' 30 Oo C L o d ,,,,,and m �.l o e d� m =I �.. S 01(r 1% 9 t8 m d or Transit Station ,�711 _ A .Build-to o Line • � 'O (see section 18.18A.040)' O e T N d O F- O r C d E L U A Q r C E r m z 9 Q Packet Pg. 389 's:Ea ATTACHMENT 1 Figure 8.E Street and North Mall Way Transit Station Area E� v 0 U C ® d E CL O W d O 10 FIT H I vii r N Central O In Mill > ' d r. I Beneii� � N V I I m Of N r I � Crest Cl �I W O I ALL -Oranga Snow I > r Shm Q Q �l Transit Station ra •••• Build-to Line 'I (see section 19.19A.(40) xorro ec+re O d O ❑ r x c v E r v m Q c C E U m V rtJ 10 a ATTACHMENT 1 ® 9. 0 E E Street and Court Street Transit Station Area Figure C 1llllI�ILILIu Lk� �° HI!I 0 TT y Ed E CL In CD NMI d w ® � 'Y U ::. C-4 r——————————�— �������7 6th C a N �V I Spruce� � Church r- n° • a I y ._. .._.. 4th I N C o © Coon I ` Um its I$Tm ��rr-- 1 , I 3rtl t_ r 2nd - (a EVE o I LLL.(— IrKingF =� _ o' HEM Transit Station F-- C Build c Line '6 i—� �- (see e section 1919A.040) 0 T A L Q) 0 Q 0 F- E V R a r d E z a Packet Pg. 391 e Q�'.. ATTACHMENT 1 c Figure io. E Street and Rialto Avenue Transit Station Area E E c I E c wO C n a -> t It ° LO 1� c F King O N L d +• I N Congress W11LIJ t I ` Julia I L. Athol O u t ° a � Cluster m ° ---' > Fjm o v m i a =I __ . �7� to Line c �w � (-- �� �� see 0 Transit a on L_ll_7 Build -t suction 19.1 BA.040) �,m rc.�E,�, O T N v d 0 D F W r C d E r v R x r c m E U m 12 ¢ ATTACHMENT 1 E c Figure ti. Hospitality Lane and Hunts Lane Transit Station Area Fi V c d w 0 o U E,, E 6 O LO T ❑Om N Q] Q� O .y d I � V) I C O .y C d U r R 17 o. i ub Center O Transit Station !I m c -•••jBuild-to Line TO _(see_ section 19.19A.040) „o,roecn,c O T A L d > Q u L ❑ Y C d S L V m Y Y Q Y C L U R w 13 a kti ' spa ATTACHMENT 1 © E u Figure .Hospitality Lane and Carnegie Drive Transit Station Area � a > [ lit � m E m V 0 U C d E CL 0 al d _ .. > o � N C m G r IZ, F. CC]l�- m O J F. � N r T �i C O C A U .d. m CL i d u Transit Station m .... B Qied-to Line `o ( section 19.19A.040) WT sc.ie Q T A d Q F- A O V t_ d E r u m a v E 14 ¢ 6.EJ ATTACHMENT 1 Figure 13. Hospitality Lane and Tippecanoe Avenue Transit Station Area E 7� 71 lIi m d U Y c d a I O m m _. L——————,Vretona. , /❑� - — Lau,el.00d Hardy v J J I N U 0 Hardl C Gould ' Gould j �[rL"1.J7T�r-tLTI� O i Davidson DIVidson / ' Co � 10 ra/"A Sycamore O _._. 0 > O � R o m a U m � _V d Qi =i 1i d i Transit Station m w •• `Build-to Line a (see section 19.19A.040) no.�o ro,rEy O 1 j O i] H O w c m E r u m Y Y Q C © d V ym Y 15 PacketPg.395 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 t9.19A.03o Transit Station Area Types E a c This chapter establishes five transit station area types,each with its own unique E character and neighborhood scale.The transit station area types are based on the d design and function of the stations and the predominant development patterns 0 surrounding the station.The station area types are a framework for tailoring the development regulations for each of the station areas.The station area types also E provide a guide for applying the TD to additional areas within the city. o A. Kendall Drive Neighborhood Stations.This type of station area provides o transit access to serve neighborhoods and businesses in the Kendall Drive area,within an approximately to-minute walk or up to a half-mile radius.The station area is typically a predominantly residential area with supporting neighborhood or community level retail and services.The transit stations are designed as pull-up stations along an arterial and may include transfers g between bus rapid transit(BRT)and local bus service.The following transit station areas are identified as Neighborhood Walk-up Station areas: X N t) Kendall Drive and Palm Avenue C6 z) Kendall Drive and Little Mountain Drive c 0 " 3) Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills Drive \... B. E Street Neighborhood Stations.This type of station area provides transit access to serve surrounding neighborhoods and businesses in the E Street U area north of 8th Street,within an approximately to-minute walk or up to a d half-mile radius.The station area is typically a predominantly residential area o with supporting neighborhood or community level retail and services.The transit stations are designed as pull-up stations along an arterial and may ?; include transfers between BRT and local bus service.The following transit station areas are identified as Neighborhood Walk-up Station areas: 20 0 t) E Street and Marshall Boulevard d z) E Street and Highland Avenue 0 3) E Street and Baseline Avenue m i C. Village/Urban Center Station Areas.This type of station area serves as a high- ° activity center and village center for nearby residential neighborhoods, up to a r half mile radius.The area contains a variety of neighborhood and community E level retail uses and services,along with the integration of higher intensity housing including student housing, and offices uses in a mixed-use a configuration.The transit stations within this station area type are designed as either a pull-up station along an arterial,or as an in-line station.The following E transit station areas are identified as Village/Urban Center Station areas: r 0 16 a Packet Pg. 396 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 1) University Avenue and North Parkway c z) E Street and North Mall Way E. Downtown Station Area.This type of station area is intended for the highest intensity of development within in the city.The downtown station areas U contain a planned mix of employment-intensive office, civic uses, regional- level retail and service uses, entertainment, hospitality, education, hospital or E CL medical facilities, and high density residential uses in a compact urban form. d Uses are to be served by an interconnected multi-modal transportation center o and public spaces network that will accommodate the highest levels of pedestrian activity.The following transit station areas are identified as Downtown Station Areas: N 1) E Street and Court Street 0 z) E Street and Rialto Avenue E. Employment Center Station Areas.This type of station area serves as N concentrated employment areas within the city.They contain a mix of office C6 or high employment industrial uses, educational or technical training institutions, hospital or medical facilities, supporting retail, restaurant, o entertainment, and other similar services. Higher density residential development, in mixed-use configurations, may also be located in > c Employment Center Station Areas.The transit stations within this station area type are designed as either a pull-up station along an arterial, or as an in-line station.The following transit station areas are identified as Employment Center Station: a C 1) Hospitality Lane and Hunts Lane U C z) Hospitality Lane and Carnegie Drive a 3) Hospitality Lane and Tippecanoe Avenue T d O ❑ H C d E s U R a E U m 17 a PacketPg. 397 W.6. ATTACHMENT 1 Q19.i9A.04o General Provisions E A. Precedence.The requirements of this chapter take precedence over the E citywide regulations found elsewhere in the City of San Bernardino Development Code. In the event of a conflict between this chapter and other 0 portions of the Development Code,the provisions of this chapter shall govern. v B. Build-to Line.This chapter establishes standards for a Build-to Line(s)that o apply to the TDs. Build-to Line is a line(s)established at a certain distance from the corresponding lot line along which the building, or a portion thereof, must o be built.The purpose of the build-to line is to ensure that redevelopment within the TD is well integrated with adjacent development and enhances the design character of existing streets,where appropriate. Build-to Lines also help to create consistent and strong pedestrian and public spaces that advance commercial development and activity.The location of applicable `o Build-to Lines is shown on Figures 1 through 13 of this chapter.Standards that apply to properties adjacent to a Build-to Line are located in Section W 19.19A.05o below. C. Modifications to Existing Development.All legally established structures and uses within the TD which do not confirm with the standards contained within o ® this chapter shall be deemed legal nonconforming uses and/or structures.The repair, renovation, and minor expansion to these uses and structures shall be > allowed as permitted by Chapter 19.62(Nonconforming Structures and Uses). d U D. Public Facilities. Public facilities such as parks, public schools, and transit centers and stations, and other public facilities due to their unique use and a special function may deviate from the provisions of this chapter upon C approval of a Design Review Development Permit. m r C 19.i9A.05o Building Form and Placement Standards A. Purpose and Intent.This section establishes standards for building form and 0 placement within the TD. Customized standards are provided for each station —° area type.The intent of these standards is to ensure excellence in community > and building design in order to create a vibrant and well-defined public realm o that is pedestrian-friendly and supports transit use. B Standards Established. Building form and placement standards in the TD are ° the same as in the base zoning district, except as follows; r d 1) Minimum and maximum requirements for Build-to Line setback, building height,and upper floor step-back shall follow the standards specified in Table 19A.o1. a U E U A 18 a PacketPg. 398 a ATTACHMENT 1 c z) New development within TD station areas shall have no minimum lot size E and no maximum lot coverage requirements. � d E 3) New development along existing railroad right-of-way shall provide a a d minimum io-foot setback for landscaping and/or a multiuse pathway to 0 accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. Q C Ol C. Residential Density. E 0. 0 i) Commercial Base Zones. When the TD applies to property within a v commercial base zone that already allows for residential uses,the maximum permitted density of the underlying zone shall apply. LO 2) Residential Base Zones. When the TD applies to property within a residential base zone, maximum permitted residential density shall be the same as the base zone. 4 N D. Commercial Intensity.When the TD applies to property within a commercial base zone, the maximum permitted intensity of the underlying zone shall N apply. o6 Table i9A.oi Building For and Placement Standards © Build-to Line Upper Floor TD Station Areas Building Height[i] Setback Step-back 2 Kendall Minimum None[3] None None Neighborhood Station Areas Maximum 25 ft.[4] 30 ft./2 stories None v m E Street Minimum None[3] None None a Neighborhood Station Areas Maximum 15 ft[4] 42 ft./3 stories None ! d U Village/Urban Minimum None None None c Station Areas Maximum 15 ft[4] 56 ft./4 stories None -° O Downtown Minimum None[3] None None Station Areas Maximum 15 ft[4] 100 ft./7 stories[5] None o' Employment Minimum None[3] None None Center Station Areas Maximum 25 ft.[4] 75 ft.16 stories None o Notes: [i]Building height of new development adjacent to existing single-family residential zones may not exceed 30ft/2 stories c applicable to all TD station areas. 0 [2]Upper floor step-back shall be measured from the building wall at the street level. E [3]Building must be set back to provide for a minimum io-foot sidewalk including street trees.Build-to line setback along Tippecanoe Avenue shall provide for landscaping and a multiuse pathway to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. .� [4]Setback areas from the build-to line not occupied by a structure or driveway shall be landscaped and/or contain semi-public Q amenities such courtyards or outdoor seating areas. [5]Additional height bonus may be allowed per section ig.o6.030(2)(E). 00i U U r 19 a Packet P9.399 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 E. Building Presence along Build-to Lines.The primary building(s)located on a E parcel shall occupy the following minimum linear percentage of the parcel width fronting a build-to line: E d 1) Kendall Neighborhood Station Area: 50% c 0 z) E Street Neighborhood Station Area: 6o% E 3) Village/Urban Center Station Area: 70% o m 4) Downtown Station Area: 80% o 5) Employment Center Station Area: 50% v F. Ground Floor Transparency.The ground floor building fa4ade facing a street N frontage line shall consist of the following minimum area percentage glass c doors, windows, or other transparent materials. v 1) Kendall Neighborhood Station Area: 5oq N r z) E Street Neighborhood Station Area: 50% o6 3) Village/Urban Center Station Area: 75% c 0 N 4) Downtown Station Area:75% c 5) Employment Center Station Area: 5o% d U G. Entrance Orientation. ° m m 1) Within the Kendall Neighborhood station area type, all ground-floor CL building facades fronting a primary street shall feature a main building ! d entrance. c A C z) Within the E Street Neighborhood,Village/Urban Center, Downtown,and Employment Center station area types, all ground-floor building facades 0 fronting a primary street shall feature the building's main entrance. v H. Minimum First Floor Ceiling Height. For buildings with ground floor 0 0 commercial uses, the minimum required floor to ceiling height at the ground r floor level for buildings facing public frontage lines should be 15 feet. 0 I. Building and Site Design. Refer to Sections 19.19A.140 to 19.19A.16o for design guidelines applicable to building form and placement within the Transit E Overlay District. m c m E r v m x 20 Q ®t duo 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 19.t9A.o6o Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses E a c A. Purpose and Intent.This section identifies permitted, conditionally permitted, Q E and prohibited land uses within the TD.The intent of these regulations is to permit and encourage land uses that create a pedestrian-friendly environment 0 that supports transit use and thriving commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. E CL B. Land Use Regulations—Commercial Base Zones.When the TD applies to v property within a commercial base zone, permitted and conditionally 0 permitted shall be the same as the base commercial zone, except as specified below. LO t) Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted with the approval of a N Development Permit: c Mn • Convenience stores pursuant to Section iq.o6.025. > • Dry cleaners N • Educational services rn • Medical/care facilities/social services (within CCS-1 only) • Mixed-use(with residential where allowed in commercial base zones) c 0 • Mobile vendors i • Neighborhood grocery stores > • Parking structures R d U z) Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited: 0 A • Auto parts sales a D • Auto repair w • Car, RV, and truck sales c • Car Washes a • Service Stations o • Service Commercial uses pursuant to Table o6.oi J., excluding T m veterinary services • Impound vehicle storage yard o • Vehicle leasing/rental • RV parks R • Blood banks ° • Drive-thru commercial uses d • Restaurants with drive-thru E • Nurseries a _ d E L U 10 zi a Pac1Pg.40t... ATTACHMENT 1 19.i9A.07o Residential Transition Standards E r c A. Purpose.This section establishes standards to ensure that new development E in the TD is compatible with adjacent single-family residential uses. w 0 B. Applicability.The following standards apply to buildings located on a parcel U that either: (D E CL 1) Shares a property line with an existing single-family residential zone; or m 2) Faces an existing single-family residential zone across a street. o Co C. Building Setbacks. 1) Front Setbacks. For a parcel located across a street from an existing single- N family residential zone, the front setback shall be no less than the average o front setback requirement of the facing homes block face but not more A than 20 ft. 2) Interior Side Setbacks. For a parcel sharing an interior side property line a with an existing single-family residential zone, the interior side setback i shall no less than the interior side setback requirement of the adjacent Gr_ property but not more than 20 ft. 0 3) Rear Setbacks. For a parcel sharing a rear property line with an existing � single-family residential zone,the rear setback requirement shall be no iu less than io feet. v d Y D. Upper Floor Step-backs. $ M 1) Front Building Walls. For a parcel located across a street from an existing single-family residential zone,the height of the front building wall shall not c A exceed 2 stories and 30 feet. S L 2) Side and Rear Building Walls. For a parcel sharing an interior side or rear property line with an existing single-family residential zone, the height of v the side or rear building wall, as applicable, shall not exceed 2 stories and > 30 feet. o x 3) Upper Floors. When permitted by the applicable zone, any portion of a o building taller than 2 stories or 30 feet should step back a minimum of 8 feet from the first-and second-story building walls. c a E r v m Q c E r v m Y 22 a PacketPg.402 ATTACHMENT 1 E. Commercial Service Location and Screening. E a C 1) Outdoor storage, trash collection and loading areas associated with E commercial uses shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet from any property a d line abutting a parcel occupied by a detached single-family home. c U 2) Outdoor storage,trash collection, and loading areas shall be located and d screened from view such that they are not visible from any parcel E CL occupied by a detached single-family home. 0 d F. Parking and Driveways. See Section 19.20.100, Subsection G(Parking Buffers). It �o G. Noise Generating Activities. Outdoor dining, amplified music, and other noise- generating activities shall be set back a minimum of 150 feet from the N property line of any P arcel occupied by a detached single-family home. � 0 19.i9A.o8o Parking d A. Purpose. a C6 1) This section establishes parking standards that apply to new and expanded land uses in the TD.The intent of the standards is to ensure the success of the transit corridor by providing efficient parking in the y corridor.This includes design standards for parking area design and parking supply standards. m (D 2) The parking requirements reflect the immaturity of the transit system L) along the corridor. As the system matures,there will be increased potential to refine the parking requirements, applying techniques such as a parking maximums (e.g., no minimum parking requirements).These �i requirements should be updated as the system matures to reflect the change in required parking along the corridor. c v B. Required On-Site Parking.All land uses within the TD shall provide on-site O parking as shown in Table 19A.3(Required On-Site Parking) unless further T w reductions can be justified as part of project approval by utilizing shared o parking, unbundled parking, in-lieu parking fees, or other parking reduction o techniques, as described below: ~ x m 1) Shared parking assessment shall be completed using the latest ° information from ULI's (Urban Land Institute's) Shared Parking. c m 2) Unbundled parking occurs when development does not include parking in E the standard cost of the facilities (e.g., residents/employees must pay x additional cost for the right to park on-site). a a C d E r m �3 a Pii ld6i Pg.403 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 3) In-lieu parking fees are effective if a parking district or other management E agency owns and maintains parking facilities.With in-lieu fees, a developer can pay the identified fee for the right to use that parking and reduce their E own on-site parking facilities. 0 Table 19A.02 Required On-Site Parkin Parkin Requirement c Parking Zoning District E (per sq.ft of leasable area,unless otherwise noted p, Commercial General (CG-1) t space per 300 sq.ft. y Commercial General - Baseline/Mt.Vernon(CG-2) 1 space per 500 sq. Commercial General- University Village CG-3 1 space per 250 sq.ft. Commercial Office CO t space per 370 sq.ft. Commercial Regional-Malls(CR-1) t space per 250 sq.ft. Commercial Regional-Downtown(CR-2) t space per 500 sq.ft. Commercial Regional-Tri-Cit /Club CR-3 1 space per 250 sq.ft. o Central City South(CCS-1 1 space per 500 sq.ft. Commercial Heavy CH 1 space per 300 sq.ft. Industrial Heavy(IH) 1 space per 1,230 sq.ft. of gross floor area Office Industrial Park(01 P) i space per 350 sq. i Public/Commercial Recreation PCR Special study required °- N Public Facilities (PF) Special study required Public Flood Control PFC 1 space per access point m Residential High(RH) 1 space per unit °- U Residential Low(RL) 1 space per unit a m Residential Medium (RM) 1 space per unit Residential Medium High RMH 1 space per unit Residential Suburban RS 2 spaces per unit d Residential Urban RU t space per unit Industrial Light(IL) t space per 625 sq.ft. O C. Residential Guest Parking. Current visitor and guest parking standards of the T 0 underlying zone shall apply. On-street parking may be considered for visitors d to residential uses along public and private streets adjacent to the residential 0 use. ° x m D. Handicapped Parking Requirements. Handicapped parking space design shall o be consistent with approved designs in the off-street parking standards Section 19.24.050 d E E. Bicycle Parking Requirements.One bicycle parking space shall be provided for U each ten automobile parking spaces provided. For office and multifamily uses, a bicycle parking should be provided in sheltered and secure facilities. E L U A �4 a Packet Pg.404 ATTACHMENT 1 © F. Location of Surface Parking. New surface parking lots should not be located E between the front wall of a building and a public street. Surface parking d should be located to the rear or side of buildings. If surface parking is not QE feasible, all other parking should be located in structures, underground, d a and/or off-site. U G. Parking Structures.All multistory parking structures shall be lined with commercial, retail, or residential uses on the ground floor along primary build- c to lines,except for pedestrian and vehicular entries into the parking structure. d H. Surface Parking Lot Screening. 0 v 1) Surface parking lots abutting a public sidewalk or street shall provide a landscaped buffer and/or decorative or"greenwall" screening along the N perimeter of the parking lot abutting the sidewalk or street. r 0 z) Surface parking abutting a residential zone shall provide a six foot high decorative wall and a landscaped buffer at least 8 feet in width. fr N r I. Alley Access. For new structures adjacent to a rear alley, service access to the m property shall be provided only through the rear alley. 'L c © Z Driveways.All new driveways within a TD shall comply with the following standards. " r t) Driveways shall comply with the dimension standards shown in Table d 19A.03 (Driveway Dimension Standards). d z) All new curb cuts providing access to a driveway from a public street shall $ be separated a minimum distance of 50 feet from another existing or new curb cut, unless the parcel size requires shorter spacing. In that case,a minimum spacing of 35 feet shall be provided. 3) Parking spaces shall not be located along the sides of a driveway. 0 T m Table 19A.03 Driveway Dimension Standards Driveway Type Drivewa Width o Minimum Maximum 1-way 8 ft. 12 ft. V 2-way zo ft. 25 ft. o c m E U U A Q O c d E U �5 a i Packet Pg. 405 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 t9•t9A.ogo Subdivision Standards E v A. Purpose.This section establishes standards for the subdivision of parcels E within the TD to ensure that large parcels are subdivided in a manner that d supports a walkable,transit-oriented environment. 0 B. Applicability.The following standards apply to subdivisions of parcels io acres or greater. c 6 C. Block Lengths. d 0 1) Except as permitted by Subsection z below, the maximum length of a block created by the establishment of one or more new streets shall not LO exceed 400 feet. N z) The City may approve a block length in excess of 400 feet when necessary o to achieve project compliance with connectivity standards in Subsection D below, or if there are physical limitations, such as the size of the project z area,that do not allow for compliance with this standard. N r C6 3) Block lengths shall be measured as the length of property abutting one 6 side of a street between either the two nearest intersecting streets or the o nearest such street and any other physical barrier to the continuity of development. Block lengths shall be measured from property lines that > intersect at an angle of 45 degrees or more. U D. Connectivity Standards. A 1) New streets established within the TD shall align and connect with any c existing adjacent street. �i d z) Block lengths shall increase connectivity to surrounding existing and A planned pedestrian and bicycle facilities. L 0 3) New development of large sites(in excess of one acre)shall maintain and A enhance connectivity with a hierarchy of public streets, private streets, walks and bike paths. 0 0 4) Bicycle/pedestrian connections shall be provided at each cul-de-sac end, where feasible. o c m E X U m a E U A w 26 a 01 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 -- G19.i9A.ioo Design Guidelines E The guidelines are intended to promote quality design,consistent with City General E Plan goals and objectives,while providing a level of flexibility to encourage creative d design.These design guidelines implement various policies in the Land Use, Housing, 0 Economic Development, Community Design, Circulation,and Natural Resources and Conservation Elements pertaining to transit oriented development. 0 A. Purpose and Intent.The following design guidelines are intended to direct the physical design of building sites,architecture, and landscape elements located o within the City's Transit Overlay District(TD).This comprehensive approach represents a more understandable and predictable role in shaping each TD's physical future by emphasizing community form,architectural typologies,and landscape design that reinforce traditional and modern development patterns. In the Downtown,Village/Urban Center, and Employment Center 4 station areas, contemporary architecture that has a strong pedestrian orientation,visual interest on the ground floor,quality long lasting materials, human scale,and articulated facades are also encouraged.The guidelines are intended to complement the mandatory TD development regulations C6 contained in this chapter by providing design solutions and interpretations of c the mandatory regulations. s B. Applicability.The guidelines shall apply to all development within the TD > districts.Any addition, remodeling, relocation,or construction requiring a building permit within the TD districts that is subject to review by the Development Review Committee shall adhere to these guidelines where d applicable. Unless there is a compelling reason,these guidelines shall be n followed. If a guideline is waived by the Development Review Committee,the Mayor and Common Council shall be notified.An appeal,which does not require a fee, may be filed by the Mayor and Common Council person within 15 c days of the waiver approval. 0 S Interpretation.Compliance with a design guideline written as a "should" is discretionary.A design guideline written with an action verb(e.g., provide, use, locate,create, establish, employ)is highly recommended. Using these 0 terms are important, but may be waived or modified by the Development Review Committee based upon an alternative deemed acceptable through the design review process. ° D. Architectural Typology.The design guidelines for architectural typologies d contained in this section(i.e., Courtyard Housing, Row houses, Live/Work E Units, Stacked Flats, Mixed Use,and Office)are not all inclusive. Other architectural typologies may also be appropriate for other permitted uses as a listed in the Development Code. E U 10 27 Q Packet Pg.407 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 QG19.t9A.110 District Image E The intent of this section is to establish a design framework for the development, E enhancement,and preservation of San Bernardino Transit Overlay Districts, based upon traditional planning and urban design patterns, historical precedents, and sustainability principles that ultimately drive the physical form of each district. d The over arching community vision for Transit Overlay Districts originates from a CL E desire to create compact pedestrian-oriented environments consistent with traditional transit oriented development principles which advocate: o t. Compact Transit Districts. Characterized by easy access to multi-modal transit systems,a wide variety of housing types and services, and job sites located very close at hand. `o_ N z. Connectivity. Characterized by a fine-grained and interconnected street network ensuring N that all trips are as short as possible,disperse ;, congestion, and are compatible with walking, biking,and transit. ■ o 3. Walkability. Characterized by commercial business, service establishments, employment,and transit facilities that are " U located within a five-minute walk. o d 4. Placemaking. Characterized by urban patterns, $ blockscapes,architecture,and landscaping that reinforces and complements the design heritage of the region. v 5. Employment Accessibility.Characterized by o good jobs located in higher-intensity"vertical °" ° campuses" located close to a variety of housing opportunities. 0 6. Diversity of Housing Types.Characterized by a fine grain of housing typologies, designed to complement a wide variety of income levels and associated lifestyles. E U U t0 Q G d E U 28 a Packet Pg.408 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 G19.i9A.12o Transit Oriented Design E d i A transit district is a defined, higher-intensity, K a !II multimodal quarter designed to accommodate a variety of coordinated movement systems, r o v including commuter rail, light rail, streetcar, BRT, bus, shuttle, pedestrian, and automobiles. E O Transit oriented development is intended to „-, maximize access to mass transit amenities with o centrally located transit stations commonly a surrounded by relatively high-intensity commercial,office,and residential development. In general, successful transit oriented districts are well-used and well-loved people places, enriched by a dynamic mix of land uses, defined street-adjacent architecture, and comfortable urban spaces. 4 N Transit oriented districts are highly permeable, composed of an extensive network of transit modes that physically and visually link to the greater community, encouraging enhanced connectivity that ultimately embraces transit ridership. C� The essence of a sustainable transit district is found in an integrated system of cLI commercial, residential, employment, and recreation uses coupled with a diversity of o +, alternative circulation/transportation features that knit the district together in an integrated and holistic fashion.The goal is a low-carbon district with a sense of place, > concentration of activities coupled with urban spaces, and efficient architecture d where daily life can unfold. L) d ■ Create a density gradient, locating the highest o intensity/density land uses closest to transit =)i stations,transitioning outward to lower intensity/density uses. ■ Locate pedestrian and transit-friendly o commercial activities at the groundl evel office and residential above where supported i 0 by the market. Use ground-floor storefront ° 0 windows to enliven the street by providing visual interest that encourages people to walk @ and take transit. ° r ■ Provide civic amenities and urban open space E uses within transit districts designed to serve _ t U transit users and residents. =° a c E U �9 a Packet Pg.409 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 ■ Develop a hierarchy of street designs that E vary in modal emphasis, providing a balanced transportation system that E accommodates transit,automobiles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. 0 • Intensify building masses at corners to £ accommodate pedestrian generating uses c that enhance ridership d a • Locate primary building entrances facing the public street,with clear connections to the adjacent sidewalk, ensuring pleasant and simple access for pedestrians. • Provide a pedestrian-scaled street network composed of a dense grid of streets with short, direct connections between land uses and transit amenities. Provide o connections to local and regional multiuse paths and trails that encourage longer walking and bicycle trips improving accessibility for transit users. N • Configure parking to be unobtrusive by orienting parking away from the ;, pedestrian realm, behind buildings, in structures, or underground. Utilize on- street parking,where feasible,to reduce off-street parking requirements, c providing parking opportunities to adjacent retail and service uses. d • Combine traditional ground-floor storefront commercial facilities at comer transit R stop locations, enhancing"trip chaining"—performing one or more errand on the same trip. a • Promote an interconnected street network and the use of short blocks(two to C five net acres)to increase vehicular and pedestrian route choice,thus enhancing ! d connectivity, reducing trip length and vehicular greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions. • Promote tight urban blocks that are not dominated by large surface parking 2 areas,reducing convection losses and heat gains as adjacent buildings protect one another from the wind and sun. d 0 • Use street trees to modify the climate in a passive way(absorbing rather that o reflecting heat energy, leaving opposed to the use of tacked-on architectural V "green-bling." o • Create high-performance, energy-efficient buildings and infrastructure. c U E r U Q C U E U 30 a Packet P b 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 G19.19A.130 Site Planning and Architectural Design E a c A. Site Planning.Site planning within E the TD should promote traditional d time honored building placements 0 while accommodating pedestrian plazas, courtyards, and parking E located internal to the site.The o goal is to place buildings adjacent v to the public streetscape in order ❑ to enhance the pedestrian experience by creating an enclosed and defined environment,while N sensitively accommodating the automobile.This traditional setting fosters a people-oriented environment in which the needs of everyday life are easily y accessible.These guidelines are also intended to accommodate a wide variety E of building typologies, in an effort to create a dynamic environment that W promotes connectivity,walkability,commerce,jobs/housing balance,and transit ridership. i 1) Residential Site Planning.The o residential site planning guidelines address a wide range of architectural typologies d designed to create a fine- grained district image.The fi m intent is to sensitively $ orchestrate the location, placement,and orientation of various multifamily attached dwelling types consistent with 20 the nature of transit oriented development districts.What is envisioned is 0 a small-scale"smattering"of traditional housing types—courtyard —° housing, row houses, stacked flats—seamlessly integrated into the fabric o of the district. Ultimately,the goal is to disperse a wide variety of o traditional multi-family attached dwelling types throughout the transit x district,oriented toward the public realm,as opposed to internal oriented o gated mega-complexes. By sensitively siting multifamily dwelling types, it v is envisioned that higher-density dwellings will successfully blend into the TD,welcoming a variety of living arrangements and associated lifestyles. r U Q C d E L m 31 Q Packet Pg.411 ATTACHMENT 1 2) Commercial and Office Site , E Planning.The commercial and ; office site planning guidelines are --- , y a intended to promote time- _ honored building placements to 0 concentrate live-work, mixed- use, and office structures to E frame and enclose the public o streetscape. Buildings are to be d placed near to the public streetscape in order to create an enclosed and defined environment that promotes commerce, social interaction,and transit ridership.The purpose is to create a fine-grained environment whereby modest live–work N housing coexists with higher-intensity mixed use and office nodes and r adjacent residential neighborhoods.This traditional setting fosters a N people-oriented environment in which the needs of everyday life are easily accessible—an atmosphere that places automobiles behind buildings, N concentrates activities, defines urban space, and promotes building placements that celebrate people. i B. Architectural Design and Image.The o San Bernardino Transit Overlay C District architectural image is born > out of a desire to create enduring d and human-scaled expressions v rooted in the traditional architectural heritage of the region.This $ traditional architectural image =i typically fosters a people-oriented environment characterized by a variety of building designs that frame and define the public streetscape. v 0 T All elements of architecture were traditionally constructed of highly durable materials, defined by a discernible base, middle, and top that add architectural O' rhythm to the streetscape. Composed of both modern interpretations and o traditional architectural precedents, architecture should be defined by cultural w influences, graced by indigenous materials, and constructed with the time- o honored design principles of mass, scale, and rhythm.The following most common architectural typologies are defined for the TD: courtyard housing, d row houses,stacked flats, live-work units, mixed-use, and office buildings.The E r guidelines do not preclude variations in these types of development or other residential and non-residential products to be built. Ultimately,the purpose is a to avoid superficial "franchise style"architecture in favor of a more traditional architectural image that embraces enjoyable life on the street. E JZ Q Packet Pg. 412 ATTACHMENT 1 Y C t) Courtyard Housing. Courtyard g * E housing is defined by multi-story I d building masses containing individual E dwelling units that commonly w enclose a centralized outdoor private a 0 U courtyard space oftentimes containing formal gardens and E decorative pavers. o d d Courtyard housing consists of: • Two to four story building masses that frame and define the public streetscape. N • Building masses enclose internally oriented courtyard space. C • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape and internal 4 .y courtyard. • Modest building insets accommodate front yard gardens and forecourts. • Individual unit frontages should be accessed directly from the street and internal courtyard. • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. L v Traditionally within mild Mediterranean climates, such as Southern California, courtyard housing was employed to capitalize on the positive d indoor/outdoor relationship characterized by multi-story building masses that frame and enclose positive garden space.The attraction of courtyard housing is its ability to function as a collection of individual units with CL private entries, yet having access to common space amenities. m u c R c_ { L 4- . ✓ ..(S YL. 0 L d > 0 0 F_ L O rC E t u A Q ir•> (D E s u Y Y 33 a Packet Pg.4 33 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 The design guidelines for courtyard housing include the following: E c v a ! d _..., E d 0 U c d 0. 0 i d m O # n r b c e f N N [ N Of a. Orchestrate multi-story courtyard housing building masses to frame and enclose semi-private open space in the form of internalized w courtyards and patios (a, b, c, d, g, j, k, 1). c m b. Provide individual unit entrances oriented toward semi-private interior °- U courtyards(k, 1) and semi-public street-oriented external forecourts(a, d). 0. c. Craft traditional courtyard housing with a distinctive base(anchoring Di the dwelling to the ground plane); shaft(transitional element which provides window transparency), and capital (roof cap which c terminates the top of the dwelling)(a, d, g, 0 d. Avoid the use of continuous common exterior corridors. Instead, access upper-story dwelling units via attractive external staircases d 0 which are fully integrated into the fabric of the building(c, i). o x e. Provide simple changes in wall plane to reduce the apparent mass and 0 scale of the dwelling, consistent with the architectural style of the home(a, g, i, v E f. Create building relief through the use of tower elements and building projections designed to enhance facade variety and visual interest(i). Q g. Define the public and private realms by providing a distinguishable and E ornamented transitional portal (h). m 34 a 13a t P��. 14 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 C d E g' t„kyy J w byx -�ai�,6VylI� II I Q • d U c m E CL O v - o m h i k t v N O W d h. Support covered porches, upper-story loggias, and balconies with c' substantial columns, piers, and posts (b, d, e,f, g). Ib i L Provide ample "punched" window and door recesses designed to 0 express building mass. Minimum window and door recess should measure four inches deep (b). c m d j. Provide traditional vertical orientated windows (a, b, g). v d k. Provide simple changes in wall plane to reduce the apparent mass and a scale of the dwelling, consistent with the architectural style of the � home (a, g, I,j). m v c R I. Provide protruding wing walls as a natural extension of the building, E designed to enclose and define private outdoor patio spaces. 0 T N m. Use arcades and colonnades as semi-private transitional elements designed to frame courtyard spaces (c). p 0 n. Provide upper-story projecting balconies supported by protruding x dimensional timber corbels(d, e,g). o o. Configure courtyards in a usable fashion, designed to accommodate outdoor entertaining, recreation, and leisure amenities(j, k, 1). E U p. Orient on-site garages toward the rear of the site accessed from an a alley. On-grade and tuck-under parking facilities should be provided, characterized by enclosed garages designed to accommodate E residents. cLi M 35 a Pi-C, g.415 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 C z) Row Houses. A row house is a E multi-story single-family dwelling that shares a E common wall with adjacent units of the same type, 0 U occupying the full width of the frontage line, designed to E frame and enclose the o streetscape in a regimented w fashion. 0 LO co v Row house design consists of: • Two-to-three story building masses that frame and define the public N c streetscape. C N • Front dooryards accommodate raised stoops or garden. • Individual units are directly accessible by pedestrians from the public street. N • Outdoor terrace space sometimes occurs between the street—facing I dwelling and rear garage. • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. 0 d This traditional tall and slender attached building typology exhibits all the trappings of the classic urban oriented dwelling form, commonly defined d by multi-story building masses with raised stoops, projecting window bays, and defined entrance features that greet the public realm. Row houses R typically form regimented street walls that promote streetscape CL continuity,framing and enclosing the public streetscape. i d v R C 0 gj T A O 0 F R O r w C d E L v m Q c d E L U A 36 a Packet Pg.416 $.E.F ATTACHMENT 1 ® The design guidelines idelines include the following E a c W a E Q d a 0 U c W E CL 0 m v N C ''...a O A m N T r a. Provide two-to-three story building masses designed to frame and define the public streetscape(a, d, g, j). °— .N N _ b. Create consistent row house unit bay rhythms designed to form a c consistent and disciplined street wall (a, d, g, m U a c. Anchor row house corners with higher intensity tower features(a, b). M a CL d. Craft traditional row houses with a distinctive base(anchoring the Mi dwelling to the ground plane), shaft(transitional element that provides window transparency), and capital (roof cap that terminates c the top of the dwelling)(c, O e. Shelter residents by providing ample entrance indentations(e, i). Row m house building entrances should be designed with a minimum square footage of zo square feet and minimum depth of 4 feet O 0 f. Define individual unit entrances oriented toward the public street(e, i). o c m E t v m a d E w 37 Q Packet Pg.417 B.E.I ATTACHMENT 1 © c d E .1 - v c I E m c i /■ is v c E g� � A a 0 m m 0 co I LO i t N C O d Im N W g. Enhance interior viewing opportunities with bay window projections to C6 optimize viewing angle(a, b, c,g, h,j). c1 0 .y h. Provide traditional windows that are vertical in orientation (a, b, c,f,g, h,j)• m d L Recess window and door openings into the row house facades to 0 LD express the mass of the building(j). a a j. Elevate row house units to ensure resident privacy while enhancing surveillance of the public streetscape (a, g, i,j, k). c R k. Avoid locating entrances directly on-grade. Instead, entries should be elevated 24 inches, minimum (a, g, i,j, k). o T A I. Integrate exterior staircases and stoops into the fabric of the building (i). Design exterior staircases and stoops, including balusters, o handrails, and treads, using similar materials as the row house dwelling. Prefabricated metal staircases shall not be permitted. m 0 m. Provide private outdoor open space in the form of stoops (i), balconies (f, 1), and dooryard gardens(k). Private open space should be a E minimum of zoo square feet m n. Orient on-site parking garages toward the rear of the site accessed Q from an alley. m E v m 38 Q P.5•w..- 18 B.E.I ATTACHMENT 1 3) Stacked Flats.A flat is a self- E contained housing unit that m occupies only part of a building. E In a stacked-flat building, several d units, above and beside each v 0 U other share a common entry and are accessed through common, E semiprivate spaces. o d m The design of stacked flats o consists of: v • Three to four-story building masses that frame and define the public N streetscape. c • Modest setback may accommodate front patio space. e .T • Buildings are accessed from a common street-adjacent entrance portal. E • Individual units are directly accessed from interior double-loaded hallways. • Internally oriented underground or podium parking is accessed from I limited street portals. Internally oriented courtyards are located above cI parking areas. °- .y N In addition to their classic scale and eye-catching proportions,the beauty of stacked-flat structures is their ability to frame and enclose broad d boulevards and avenues, creating a pedestrian-friendly environment. It is this traditional relationship of the public street to the private building that is critically important in establishing a sheltering and safe pedestrian a setting that enhances social interaction and commerce. D v U C R •w► O > _ W 1�1 � R e.. C d E L U R a d e U R r r 39 a s.e.l ATTACHMENT 1 0 c The design guidelines for stacked flats include the following: v C d d a d 0 O L) k C d E 11 O Z LO d O a r N r C O a is N d N r r a. Create traditional,formal, proportional, and rhythmic multilevel building masses to unify the public blocksca e a d O— b. Provide traditional,formal building masses designed to frame and � enclose the public streetscape(a, d, g, j). U a c. Celebrate the street corner by increasing or articulating building mass, m using tower elements as "gatepost" architectural features(b). c i d. Distinguish buildings with a discernible base (c)and cap (a, d, e,f,)that to define the top and bottom of the structure. Use continuous building 1 elements, such as roof eaves(a, d, e,g), cornice elements(f, h), a window bands(b, d,f, g, h), and masonry foundation bases(c)to 0 T assure building unity and blockscape continuity. —° w e. Rest the building on a wide discernible foundation base to anchor the c building to the ground plane(c). ~ x R f. Create visual rhythms with building masses that divide facades into individual repetitive components. Segment buildings into individual C elements using the following techniques: E r v • Vertical tower masses(b, e) Q • Horizontal repeating spandrels WW • Consistent repetitive roof forms(a, d, e) r U R 40 ,m ATTACHMENT 1 9 d E Q � o aci E 0. 0 W G h i jk I LO � 11-01' 0 > N r g. Distinguish individual floors using the following techniques: c� • Projecting horizontal cornice elements (f) °- U) • Decorative masonry belt courses (f) • Change in material pattern between floors (f) R m h. Define individual units with subtle facade articulations. Use repetitive s elements such as structural bays(i), recessed loggias (g,i, 1) and projecting balconies(k)to distinguish individual units. j i i. Provide distinguishable recessed building entrances, oriented toward c the public street, as common building access points to internal- oriented lobbies and vertical circulation elements(i). O T j. Generally center windows on the building mass, and align both m L horizontally and vertically(a, b, d, e,f, g, h). > ❑ k. Express building mass by recessing window openings in building facades a minimum of 4 inches(a, b, d,f, g, h). I. Provide windows that are vertical in orientation (a, b, c, d, e,f, g, h, k). c a m. Integrate projecting balconies (k)and recessed loggias(g, 1)seamlessly with the design of the building. Projecting balconies should be minimum 5 ft deep and recessed loggias should be a minimum of 6o a square feet. d E t U W 41 Q Paskt°Pg..427 , 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 4) Live-Work Units.A live—work E building is designed to accommodate both commercial E and residential uses within a d single unit, commonly with retail 0 and office uses on the first floor and upper floors dedicated to E residential use. o d d Live-work units consist of: ❑ �o • Two to three-story building masses that frame and define the public streetscape. N • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape. G • Sidewalk-adjacent building masses accommodate ground—floor °- N businesses. > d • Ground floor businesses are accessed directly from the public street. Private residences are accessed from internal lock-outs or separate street-oriented entrances. • Rear-oriented enclosed garages are accessed from a rear alley. 0 Traditionally, live-work establishments were occupied by merchants or hope employees who lived directly above their place of business,enabling G entrepreneurs to establish business in an economical fashion.With the economic realities of today,this lifestyle concept is again gaining acceptance as a small business approach designed to provide goods and services while promoting enhanced housing diversity. C d U G G 1 R d > O H N C d E t U Q G v E s `w U R 42 a Packet Pg.422 ATTACHMENT 1 Y The design guidelines include the following: E v C a d E a 0 U Y c d E CL G d m 0 m t LO b c e f N r�• � y N r r I a. Provide multistory live-work building masses designed to frame and o define the public realm (a, d, g, j). m b. Provide dual—unit entrance designed to accommodate both residents and merchants. Provide direct storefront workspace access oriented L) toward the public streetscape. Provide secondary upper-story access m Y designed to accommodate residents(i). 4 a a c. Design ground—floor live-work storefronts using traditional storefront d heights to allow natural light to penetrate street-oriented display windows, illuminating storefront interiors (c, e,f). 'v 0 d. Express the underlying structure of the building. Use a sequence of storefront structural bays designed to convey how the building stands up(c, e,f). 0 0 e. Provide a series of storefront structural bays, composed of repetitive vertical columns/piers and horizontal spandrels designed to create a 0 consistent facade rhythm (c, e,f). C W E s u m Y Q c W E r u m Y Y 43 a Pa ketaQj 423 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 d B d E d a U Y C d E W a O d d ❑ h i k l: N � N I � it O N r A f. Distinguish higher-intensity building corners with tower elements IL designed to resolve two converging street walls (h). l c 0 .y g. Provide upper-story private resident outdoor open space in the form of decks(i)and balconies (k). Private open space should be a minimum of loo square feet. Balconies should be a minimum 5 ft in depth. w U h. Recess doors and windows into masonry and exterior plaster walls to R express building mass. Minimum door and window recess should o. measure four inches (k). d U L Accommodate vehicles parking onsite by providing rear-oriented enclosed garages(1). T 0 j. Live/work configurations include: R d 7 • Live above work 0 • Live within work • Live behind work(attached) A • Live behind work(detached) c m E s U N Q Y C d E V A 44 a Packet Pg..rZ4: 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 5) Mixed-Use. Mixed use is E defined by higher-intensity developments that include two E or more physically integrated uses on one site or within one o structure, including combinations of retail, office, E institutional, residential, or o other land uses. ; v Mixed-use buildings consist of: N • Three to four-story building masses frame and define the public streetscape. • Building frontages orient toward the public streetscape. 2 • Sidewalk-adjacent building masses accommodate ground-floor businesses. • Ground—floor businesses are accessed directly from the public street. r Offices and private residences are accessed from internal lobbies and hallways. • Internally oriented underground,podium, or parking court are N Oaccessed from limited street portals. Traditionally, mixed-use districts are designed as pedestrian-friendly d environments characterized by a variety of building typologies designed to frame,enclose,and embrace the public realm. Because commercial, residential,and employment land uses are placed in such close proximity, $ the needs of everyday life are easily accessible,while enhancing =i alternative transportation modes such as walking and transit ridership. M c v A O T m U x � rY � C d E L U t6 Q © G v E z U R V_ 45 Q Packet Pg.425 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 ® c Design guidelines for mixed-use buildings include the following: � v d v E !t rrr U rr E 0. trr► , N N I c O 2 D N W a. Create traditional street walls composed of a storefront base, upper- cI story facade, and roof cap designed to frame and enclose the 4 .y streetscape, creating a pedestrian-friendly "Main Street" atmosphere `m i (a, d, g,))• c m d b. Differentiate individual building masses along the street wall with v slight indentations to enhance blockscape variety and visual interest(a, m d, g)• a c. Use similar structural bay and window rhythms to promote blockscape cam, continuity c a d. Express the underlying structure of the building. Use a sequence of o structural bays designed to convey how the building stands up(a, d, g, 1)• > O e. Provide tower elements to accentuate and highlight building corners, emphasizing higher intensity land uses (a, d, b). 0 f. Use tower elements at corners as a transitional element that resolves two converging street walls(a, b, d, E g. Create visual rhythms with structural bays that divide buildings into x individual repetitive components (e). ¢ C E V r 46 ¢ PacketPg. ATTACHMENT 1 ® c d E a d 0 0 U M d m* a 0 d m �o ' LO N_ C i O •y d N Of h. Provide a series of structural bays, composed of repetitive vertical columns/piers and horizontal spandrels/arches designed to create a consistent facade rhythm (f, h). y d i. Create visually distinct and substantial three-dimensional columns (i) c and piers(h). m U v j. Promote human scale by creating a series of proportional structural w m bays that segment the building into individual components. Structural a bay width typically ranges between 24-30 feet(h). d U k. Use traditional storefront heights to allow natural light to highlight m display windows, illuminating storefront interiors (e,f, h, 1). TO 0 1. Design storefronts that are balanced,with symmetrical proportions defined by structural bays, and characterized by storefront display windows, transom windows, recessed doorways, bulkheads, sign 0 0 bands, and awnings/canopies (e,f, h, 1). M M m. Create substantial covered arcades capable of accommodating ° pedestrian movements while sheltering patrons from the elements (i). m n. Provide substantial three-dimensional arches designed to express the L U mass of the building(e,f, i, 1). o. Use columns to continue the plane of upper-story facades (i). L V R 47 a Pa a ' 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 0 p.p. Design awnings to complement the structural framework of the E building. Awnings should express the shape and proportion of c structural bays and window openings(1). a m q. Locate transom windows above storefront display windows to c increase interior daylighting(e,f, k). 0 C N E CL O d Q O W O N N C O .y d 0' N r N C� O .N `L c d U n d m CL u c m C_ L O T N d O O F- r d E t V R Q C d U V A Y Y 48 a Packet Pg.428 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 ® 6) Office.An office building is a place E available for the transaction of general ' . c business,administration,and research E and development functions typically not involving labor, manufacturing, 0 fabrication or retail sales. v E office buildings should generally be o characterized by: 0 • Three to four—story building masses that frame and define the public streetscape. • Building frontages are oriented toward the public streetscape, `- sometimes accommodating covered arcades and colonnades. • Buildings are accessed from a street-adjacent common entrance portal. 4 .y • Individual office units are accessed from internal lobbies and hallways. • Internally oriented courtyards are located above underground or podium parking. • Internally oriented underground, podium, or parking courts are accessed from limited street portals. 0 ® Within traditional urban settings, office buildings become an integral d element within the district mosaic, integrating seamlessly with other uses r to form a rich and diverse mixture.Traditionally, office buildings and v primarily building entrances,are located contiguous to the street, designed to frame and enclose the public realm while accommodating parking within internal-oriented courtyards or parking structures. Q D form i t U C i o w c m E 0 U R Q C 01 U U N 49 Q Packet Pg.429 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 Design guidelines for office buildings include the following: c a d E d 0 0 L) c m E CL 0 w _ o v T LO e f R c 0 M N W N W a. Create building masses reflecting a distinguishable base, shaft, and capital (a, b, c, d, g, c N b. Rest the building on a distinguishable ground floor base or pedestal > designed to anchor the building to the ground plane(g). r m U c. Provide ground floor arcades and recessed entries that shelter pedestrians from the elements (f, k). CL d. Create a definable building shaft, designed as a transitional facade =i element which links the building base and capital (h, i). c A e. Crown the building with a discernible building capital, designed to v terminate the top of the structure (a, d, g,j). 0 T m f. Distinguish building corners by providing tower elements as landmark structures, designed to resolve two converging street walls (b). 0 0 g. Create structural bays that visibly display the underlying structure of the building(e,f, h). o h. Segment buildings into repetitive scale-giving elements composed of columns/piers and spandrels/arches (e,f, h, i). E 0 0 i. Create distinct and recognizable horizontal floor divisions. Use such a techniques as horizontal window bands, continuous cornice elements, © masonry belt courses, and repetitive window lintels designed to m distinguish individual floors (a, c, d, e,g, h) i,j). u 50 a Packet Pg. 430 ATTACHMENT 1 r E o v E CL 0 d m h i k 1 v _ N r C O _ y r Of j. Create visual rhythms with structural elements that divide facades into individual repetitive components. Building structures should be segmented into simple symmetrical components based upon the following facade rhythm standards: • Vertically repeating columns and piers (e,f, h, i). W • Horizontal repeating spandrels(h,j) 0 • Vertically-oriented windows repeated in horizontal bands recessed a minimum of four inches from the solid wall plane designed to express building mass(e,g, h, i,j). CL i m k. Segment horizontal window openings with mullions into a series of c vertical oriented windows(e, h). m I. Provide traditional windows divided by muntins into a series of m individual window panes (h). O m. Define window opening with lintels, masonry belt courses, sills, and o awnings (1). m 0 n. Use traditional, small, and durable human-scaled masonry building " materials (c, d,j). c d E o. Provide a definable and prominent building entrance designed to signal egress(k). a © 0 m E U M_ 51 a ",:Pack 431 ; 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 7) Building Materials.Traditional indigenous building materials promote E community identity by promoting an identifiable architectural vision,firmly c rooted in the vernacular of the region.Traditionally, building materials E such as brick and stone masonry are measured in human-scaled units. Because these materials are so commonplace, literally the building blocks of a civilized society,they are easily discernible and readily understood. Traditional building materials help us understand and scale larger buildings, ultimately connecting us to the built environment. o m d 0 v N_ C O N N N C7 c c: 0 0 d v a. Use durable and refined wall materials to project a traditional a architectural image(a). i b. Design buildings that use heavy, visually solid foundation materials(b, e)that transition upward to lighter wall cladding and roof materials. E v 0 c. Use durable and substantial foundation materials such as rusticated stone(b), polished granite, and sandblasted concrete(c). 0 d. Provide human-scaled wall materials that are familiar in their o dimensions and can be repeated in understandable units(b, c). V R e. Provide wall materials such as brick and stone masonry that help 0 people interpret the size of a building(b,e). r d f. Use traditional brick masonry dimensions(b, e). g. Use real, smooth,three-coat exterior plaster applications(a, c). a Exterior plaster finishes should appear hand troweled,with slight surface variations(a, c). E U A 52 a PacketPg.432 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 g 1 - -_• , E E C d yil a "'f d 0 l!- Q .r E n. O M � e L N r C O .y h. Provide exterior plaster finishes that are not overly exaggerated or irregular such as Spanish Lace. w L Use metal cladding(such as corrugated metal)with discretion, C4 primarily for architectural accents and structural members (f, g, j). c O j. Use traditional gloss-glazed transparent tile with deep, rich colors for architectural accents. > c k. Avoid large featureless wall surfaces, such as metal screens, unrelieved stucco facades, and all-metal spandrel panels. A I. Provide material changes at a change in wall plane on an inside corner $ (f)• m m. Use durable metal roof materials that enhance the longevity of buildings, including copper, Corten steel, standing seam(i), and "V" E =Q seam. 0 T n. Provide traditional straight-barrel mission tile roofs composed of clay or concrete if tile is to be used (h). O> 0 o. Use rubber membrane materials for flat roofs only. x R p. Define flat roofs with a substantial parapet wall capped with o ornamental coping designed to screen vents and mechanical equipment(k). E q. Support roof eaves and rake overhangs with substantial dimensional timber beams, rafter tails, brackets, and corbels(1). a a r. Avoid nondurable roofing materials such as wood shingles (real or a cementitious)and composition roofing. E v A 53 a �'433.. ATTACHMENT 1 Gig.igA.140 Parking Design E -a C On-street parking lanes, parking structures, and rear parking courtyards are E dedicated to the temporary storage of vehicles. The intent is to reduce the physical d and visual impact of vehicles,fostering a pedestrian atmosphere. 0 Traditionally, parking garages were beautifully ornamented structures seamlessly E integrated into the fabric of the business district, having their own special typology o designed to harmonize with their surroundings.Today, new innovative solutions have been developed to soften the impact of vehicular storage, including screening o garages with commercial storefronts, underground parking, and internal parking v courts. a d -, kN C O .N d W �I C O > as.1�1 d 6 a. Locate parking structures internal to the site and screened from public v view. Use street-oriented building masses and commercial storefronts to screen parking structures from the streetscape (a, b, c, d, e,f). 0 b. Provide ample parking structure identification signage designed to T A L distinguish and highlight public parking garages (b, c). > 0 0 c. Design the facade of parking structures to mimic a traditional building composed of window openings and accruements intended to project a m consistent streescape image(c, e). c d. Use continuous horizontal elements, such as projecting cornice m E elements, window bands, and brick courses consistent with adjacent building facades(c). a c d E s U A 54 a 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 AIR � E 0 E Q O N N 6 i k 1 v N r C O d e. Align parking structure facade walls with adjacent buildings to create a W continuous street wall (e). oe f. Promote on-street parking opportunities to slow traffic in district cI cores. Motorists must be alert and aware to navigate the traditional 4 N intimate streetscape (g, h, i). c g. Provide on-street parallel parking lanes designed to promote a d traditional "Main Street" image and physical buffer. Parallel parking lanes are symbolic of traditional downtowns and provide a physical D M and psychological buffer between the street and pedestrian sidewalk $ (g)• h. Provide on-street parallel parking lanes to accommodate short term convenience parking(g, h, i). 20 0 i. Provide diagonal parking stalls to encourage short-term convenience A L parking opportunities, enhancing commerce(i). 0 j. Eliminate pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. Curb cuts should not occur along storefront street walls. Curb cuts should only occur on side-alley- A loaded blocks, providing alley access to internally oriented parking ° courts and service areas. c v k. Locate long-term on-site parking behind buildings, screened from public view(j, k). x a I. Design onsite parking areas as dual-usage courtyards to accommodate r W vehicles as well as pedestrians. Provide amenities such as raised E r v m Y Y 55 a -Packet Pg,435 '` 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 C fountain pedestals,tree bosques, and textured pavement treatments E designed to accommodate pedestrians(1). d E m. Segment large parking areas into a series of small parking courts d enclosed by buildings and framed by canopy trees designed to 0 minimize the scale of the total parking area(j, k, 1). d n. Create internalized parking courts designed to accommodate long- c term parking opportunities. Design parking courts as dual-usage plazas intended to accommodate both vehicular and pedestrian activities. o �o o. Surface parking lots adjacent to public streets should incorporate a minimum 4 ft deep landscape buffer with trees and other plant material.Where a landscape buffer is not feasible, a screen wall with decorative detailing and/or landscaping should be provided.Screen o walls should be visually permeable and provide openings for pedestrian access. Gt9.t9A.15o Landscape Design A. Landscape Image.The San Bernardino Transit Overlay District landscape oI pattern is intended to project a formal impression designed to reinforce the transit village image, rooted in the landscape heritage of the region.This > formal landscape pattern justifies itself through the use of consistent street tree plantings which form tree-lined rows that frame and define the U streetscape while shading and sheltering pedestrians from the elements. Public urban open spaces, such as plazas and courtyards,formal tree plantings a create a framework outlining these public oriented amenities.Within TDs,the CL i landscape image is designed to reinforce a pedestrian dominated d U environment that celebrates human culture rather than the automobile to m create a sense of place while reinforcing the higher intensity nature of these a transit nodes as commercial, residential and employment hubs of the o community. m d B. Landscape. Landscape design is intended to improve or ornament the physical o environment through the use of such elements as plant materials,water ° features, and land forms, designed to modify the physical setting for aesthetic m purposes. o C. Street trees are an important asset to the streetscape, due to there functional d ability to modify the micro climate by providing summer shade,winter E transparency(solar gain),while purifying the air. From a design standpoint, trees can positively frame and enclose the streetscape,creating an enhanced a pedestrian environment that defines the public realm;while formal orchard- style tree grids soften parking fields. E Z U 56 a Packet Pg.436 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 a 0 a d �= m E Q 0 o U c m E 0. 0 m m b c LO v N O N > d a. Provide a consistent streetscape image through the use of formal N canopy-style street tree plantings that provide summer shade and °' winter transparency(a, d). fOi c 0 b. Plant formal rows of street trees designed to frame and enclose the d streetscape(a, d). > C m d c. Provide raised planters adjacent to light rail transit lines designed as a U physical shield to guard pedestrians (b). m m d. Use raised planters contiguous to higher capacity arterials, buffering pedestrians from vehicles (c). v C e. Provide individual groupings of plant containers(b)or raised planters m C along sidewalks with colorful flowering annuals and perennials(e,f). 0 T f. Use tree grates and guards to protect street tree root systems, reducing soil compaction. p> 0 g. Design landscape buffers adjacent to rear building elevations to soften building architecture while providing a landscaped transition between 0 the rear parking area and building. rc h. Use tress in grids designed to mimic orchard-style plants designed to E provide a shady grove designed to shelter vehicles and motorists from m elements (g, h). a c d E L v A 57 Q PacktfPg.437 6.E.1 ATTACHMENT 1 d 9 J> E C d E a d 0 0 d E m m 0 h i k ► •• v LO N r C C O N 4) W i. Use tall columnar trees to frame and enclose parking fields creating a solid backdrop that protects interior canopy-style orchard trees. ° I j. Use tall columnar trees to segment large parking fields into a series of o "outdoor rooms" breaking-up large expanses of pavement. v k. Use medians and islands to segment large parking fields creating variety and visual interest while mimicking traditional orchard grids(h). v a w I. Provide landscape amenities including raised fountain pedestals, tree bosques, and enhanced paving designed to screen vehicles from public C view(f,g). NI m. Provide decorative and ornamental low parking field walls to screen E vehicles from public view(k, 1). 90` T n. Build seating into low screen walls designed to accommodate waiting transit riders(k). > 0 o. Use native and drought tolerant plant materials to promote an indigenous landscape image. o p. Segment landscape areas into individual hydro zones designed to c conserve water by grouping similar plant materials with like water E r requirements. a d E r A 58 a Packet Pg.438 San Manuel Band of Mission Indians 0 N 1 O 2 r C W E April 18, 2012 d E Mario Suarez a (D Principal Planner o Community Development Department L) 300 North"D"Street E San Bernardino, CA 92418 c d m 0 Re: San Manuel Band of Mission Indians —Comments to City of San Bernardino Proposed Transit Overlay District to the General Plan and Associated Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2004111132. r- 0 Dear Mr. Suarez: (D_ N r W The San Manuel of Band of Mission Indians("Tribe"),a federally recognized Tribe, wishes to express its appreciation to the City of San Bernardino for the briefing on the Transit Overlay District(TD)to the General Plan. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians are a Serrano people whose ancestors inhabited a large area of San Bernardino County. The Tribe appreciates the m opportunity to comment on the TD Overlay. The Tribe actively participates in and supports community and regional economic and social initiatives. The Tribe maintains a close spiritual relationship to many important cultural places in the landscape and feels a keen stewardship obligation to protect and preserve these. The Tribe actively engages in consultation and preservation efforts of cultural resources throughout San Bernardino county. The Tribe supports a a long range plan that employs a sustainable communities strategy in siting transportation W projects and in land use, open space and preservation of biological and cultural resources. E E 0 U The Tribe believes that it is essential that the City of San Bernardino and other regional agencies Y establish a meaningful and timely consultation process with the Tribe in accord with the unique legal relationship existing between the United States and Indian Tribal governments and the state E of California as set forth in California Senate Bill 18. The Tribe looks forward to continuing working with the City in order to implement this consultation. The Tribe's experience has shown that regular and meaningful consultation, resulting in meaningful and timely process of seeking, discussing and considering carefully the views of others in a manner that is cognizant of all E parties' cultural values and where feasible seeking agreement is most effective. m a 26569 Community Center Drive • Highland,, Cry 92346 • Office: (909)864-8933 • FAX. 5m, San Manuel Band of f Mission Indians The Tribe offers the following language it feels strengthens the processes for protection of cultural resources in relation to the TD Overlay and the associated SBGPU EIR, specifically to Section 5.5.3 Mitigation Measures Identified in the SBGPU EIR and Applicable to the Proposed 9 Project, GP 5.4-2 in the ADDENDUM TO THE.-SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED SPECIFIC PLANS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT z° REPORT, SCH NO. 2004111132. d E GP 5.4.-2 After ...In areas of documented or inferred archaeological and /or paleontological resource presence, City staff shall require applicants for development permits to provide studies E to document the presence or absence of such resources. On properties where resources are identified, such studies shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program o and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified cultural preservation expert. a) r E CL Insert: Such studies will include a phase 1 archaeological or historic architectural survev in all projects that have not been previously surveyed and a records check with the San Bernardino 0 Museum Information Center and a check of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHQ sacred lands file. On properties where cultural resources are identified, the Citv shall require that the Native American tribes or individuals identified by the NAHC, be contacted by project proponent forfurther information and consultation on the project. Avoidance oflhe cultural resource is the preferred alternative. Ifavoidance is not feasible, the City shall require that the o project proponents consult with any tribe requesting notification of the discovery of cultural resources on the project and such tribe shall be given the opportunity to inspect the cultural resource and consult with the City and the project proponent in the evaluation of the N significance of the resource and in its treatment and disposition. If there are known or inferred Co archaeological resources in the area of the project, the City, on the request of a tribe, shall v afford serious consideration to requiring that the project proponent emplov Native American monitors. In the case where there is a discovery of previously unknown archaeological resource m and in which there is a likelihood that additional archaeological resources may discovered as 00 the project progresses and a qualified cultural preservation expert so agrees, the City shall 3 g1ford serious consideration to requiring that the project proponent emplov Native American monitors on the project. The City shall require that all construction personnel be trained regarding the recognition of possible buried cultural remains and the protection of all cultural vii resources, during construction, prior to initiation of construction or ground disturbing activities. w The San Manuel Band or other tribal representatives should be afforded opportunity to present a E Worker Awareness program for cultural resources for all construction personnel. Training shall E inform all construction personnel of the procedures to be followed upon the discovery of cultural v resource materials, including Native American burials. Y� c m E The Tribe's experience has shown that the use of certified Native American Monitors(persons who are certified and monitor archaeological resources with specific knowledge of local a ancestral California Native American sites and cultural practices) may prevent costly delays and offer unique opportunities to contribute to all parties' efforts to preserve and promote an m important part of cultural history. The Tribe appreciates your consideration of the above m 2 26569 Community Center Drive • Higk(and, CA 92346 • Office: (909) 864-8933 • FAX. ( `I t-�� . e��Fty�4d0°' San Manuel Band of Mission Indians language as well as the opportunity to continue the government-to-government dialogue. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 9 N Very truly yours, c z SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS E W nthony adn E Director of Cul 1 Resources Mana men d v 0 U « c d E CL 0 m m 0 �c v u7 c 0 .y N O r O I a C A m d 3 C R C NI C W E E 0 U Y c d E 0 v Q « C d E t U A l Q ^�I 3 26569 Community Center Drive • Hi ghland, CA 92346 • Office: (909)864-8933 • FAX: Packet Pg. 441 6.E.n 0 N_ • o Z c N Technical Memorandum E a DATE June 4, 2012 v 0 To City of San Bernardino, Community Development Department c CONTACT Mario Suarez, AICP, CNU-A, Principal Planner E CL FROM Nicole Morse, Esq., Senior Associate d v SUBJECT Findings for the "Addendum to the San Bernardino General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans Environmental Impact Report" (SCH No. 2004111132) dated January 2012. Ln PROJECT NO. COSB-18.OL c 0 A) The Planning CenterlDC&E prepared the Addendum to the previously certified City of San Bernardino 2005 General Plan Update(SBGPU EIR) and Associated Specific Plans Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2004111132. It serves as the environmental review for the proposed Transit Overlay District (TD) zoning © designation and associated development standards and design guidelines for areas surrounding the City's transit v stations(proposed project). The TD and its regulations are proposed in order to implement the City's General Plan m policies promoting transit-oriented development. Initially the proposed TD was processed with a zone change ° only. However, it was determined through the entitlement process that a general plan amendment would be required in order to update the General Plan Land Use Map to provide consistency between the City's zoning M code and general plan. a c� m Since it was determined that a general plan amendment would also be required, the project was then required to rn comply with the Native American Indian Tribal Consultation pursuant to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill ° 18 (Chapter 905, Statutes of 2004). Government Code §65352.3 requires local governments to consult with E tribes prior to the adoption or amendment of a general plan or specific plan proposed on or after March 1, 2005. 'O c As detailed further below, Mitigation Measure 5.4-2 was revised as a result of consultation with the San Manuel m a Band of Mission Indians. a The change in the project description and to the mitigation measure would not result in changes to any of the o environmental impacts identified in the Addendum, because there would be no change to the allowable number E of units, square footage or intensity of development. With respect to the project findings, the changes to the m project and mitigation would not affect any of the impact determinations made with regard to the quality of the 00 environment, including, but not limited to fish and wildlife, sensitive habitats, or California history or prehistory. m Nor would the revisions to the project cause an adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly, since to no new development or change in land uses is being proposed. Therefore, the revisions to the project would not _J1 result in substantial changes resulting in new significant environmental impacts or the type of significant new information that would require preparation of a subsequent EIR or supplemental EIR pursuant CEQA Guideline E Sections 15162 or 15163, respectively. m The changes to the project description resulting from GPA 12-01 and revised Mitigation Measure GP 5.4-2 resulting from the Native American Tribal Consultation are discussed in further detail below. c © a, E L U n3 Orange County • Northern Californio • Los Angeles/Downtown • Los Angeles/West • Inland Empire • San Diego Q 3 MacArthur Place Suite 1100 1 Santa Ana CA 92707 1 714.966.9220 1714.9&9221 (n www.planninecerner.com Packet Pg. 442 Ruzo June 4,2012 Page 2 C G v E d E v 'a 0 U c m Project Description o The proposed General Plan Amendment 12-01 would update the City's General Plan Land Use Map to allow o implementation of Development Code Amendment No. 12-01,which would amend Article I—General Provisions, Section 19.02.060, Establishment of Land Use Zoning Districts to add Transit Overlay District (TD) and amend It Article II — Land Use Zoning Districts, to add Section 19.19A Transit Overlay District to the Development Code pertaining to development standards and design guidelines. c Presently, there are no specific land use designations for TD in the City's General Plan Land Use Map. Generally, 4 State law requires that the City's General Plan Land Use Map and zoning regulations be consistent. The proposed 2 General Plan Amendment will update the City's General Plan Land Use Map to add Transit Overlay District (TD). The proposed amendment will not change the underlying land use designations for the CCS-1, CG-1, CG-2, CG-3, a O CH, CO, CR-1, CI-1, CR-3, IH, IL, OIP, PCR, PF, PFC, RH, RM, RMH, RS, and RU districts and will only serve as an overlay designation to allow for the development of 13 transit station areas, otherwise not currently permitted in of the City's General Plan Land Use Map pursuant to Development Code Section 19.02.060 (2). 0 No development/construction is proposed as part of General Plan Amendment No. 12-01. The proposed w amendment will provide the necessary tool to implement 13 transit station areas for transportation, shopping D and living opportunities for residents of the City and will ensure that development within the TD Overlay District a will be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map. 0 Native American Indian Consultation The City of San Bernardino sent a written request to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) asking for m v a list of Tribes with whom to consult. NAHC sent a list of seven (7) tribes to consult. On February 11, 2012, the City mailed a written request to eight (8) tribes inviting them to participate in a consultation with 90 days to respond. The City made follow up calls by telephone. One (1) tribe responded to this request, the San Manuel 0 Band of Mission Indians. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians proposed additional language to be added to E Mitigation Measure GP 5.4-2 in order to further strengthen the protection of cultural resources. This language has been added to Mitigation Measure GP 5.4-2 as shown below in bold. oho GP 5.4-2 In areas of documented or inferred archeological and/or paleontological resource presence, City staff rmiJ shall require applicants for development permits to provide studies to document the presence/absence of such resources. On properties where resources are identified, such studies shall c provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ E preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified cultural preservation expert. Such studies shall include a Phase I archaeological or historic architectural survey for projects that have not °. been previously surveyed that includes a records check with the San Bernardino Museum Information ¢ Center and a check of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) sacred lands file. On d E z U Q Packet Pg.443 u�zo� June 4,2012 Page 3 ffl c m E -o r 0 E properties where cultural resources are identified, the City shall require that the Native American tribes or individuals identified by the NAHC, be contacted by the project proponent for further U information and consultation on the project. Avoidance of the cultural resource is the preferred alternative. If avoidance is not feasible,the City shall require that the project proponents consult with any tribe requesting notification of the discovery of cultural resources on the project and such tribe E E shall be given the opportunity to inspect the cultural resource and consult with the City and the —0 d project proponent in the evaluation of the significance of the resource and in its treatment and d disposition. If there are known or inferred archaeological resources in the area of the project, the City, on the request of a tribe, shall afford serious consideration to requiring that the project o proponent employ Native American monitors. In the case where there is a discovery of previously unknown archaeological resource and in which there is a likelihood that additional archaeological resources may be discovered as the project progresses and a qualified cultural preservation expert so agrees, the City shall afford serious consideration to requiring that the project proponent employ o Native American monitors on the project. The City shall require that all construction personnel be A trained regarding the recognition of possible buried cultural remains and the protection of all v cultural resources, during construction, prior to initiation of construction or ground disturbing activities. The San Manuel Band or other tribal representatives should be afforded opportunities to present a Worker Awareness Program for cultural resources for all construction personnel. Training oI shall inform all construction personnel of the procedures to be followed upon the discovery of cultural resource materials, including Native American burials. w a 0 M U) 0 E a c m a v c 0 0 E m m JI C d E t U a d E s m Q P g.444 0 N r O Z G d E C d E Q d O O U V C d E Q O LO d d LO r r 0 O N .j d N -4I 0 w 0 K W IL IL (7 m rn O E v c m a a C O O E G1 00 r m N JI C d E ZZ t U A a d E z a Packet Pg. 445 6.E.o Draft notes-from Speakers ATTACHMENT M Summary notes of the Public Input from Mayor and Common Council Meeting June 18, 2012: o Hasan Ikhrata, 818 7a' Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017: Proponent z° • Represents the Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG) • Just last April the Regional Council adopted the Regional Transportation Sustainable Communities Study a major landmark for the region. • He has seen how TODs have transformed towns, ghost towns, into lively cities. E • The transformation of L.A. has been amazing. There is no reason why San Bernardino d cannot do the same. o • It works, it makes places safer and improves the quality of life. U c • It is good for the region and the city. E • He is a resident of San Bernardino County and proud to be a representative of SCAG. o • He supports the TD Overlay Ordinance as it does help communities transform themselves into livable communities. o Randall Lewis, 1156 N. Mountain Ave.,Upland, Ca 91786: Proponent • Representing the Lewis Group of Companies. • There is a growing recognition that land use decisions, transportation decisions and economic development decisions have to be made together. This links the three. .° • Where do we want to see investments in infrastructure? Seeing investments into > infrastructure is like a gift that keeps on giving. Investing in infrastructure provides jobs. It can help a city or region for decades to come. d • The market point of view is another important point to provide an edge to future home buyers, "it gives you an edge." The kinds of people that are going to be buying homes, opening up businesses and shopping at stores are looking at transit as an important component in their decision making. It allows for a number of different housing types, U allowing the market to select which housing type would work best. • It will help the City a great deal in branding the City. It will send a powerful message that San Bernardino does mean business, is investing in the future and wants to do what it c can to attract high quality development in the future. n • Last point is competition - one of the things the private sector has learned during the a' downturn is that people have choices in where to live and business have choices to invest o their dollars. This would give San Bernardino a real competitive edge over many of the cities in the region. E • The housing Lewis Group Companies are developing now are dramically different than ('n the housing they did 20 or 30 years ago. • He sees what is being accomplished with the new ordinance, it is "future proofing" the community in that it may probably be right for 2012, but if it is not, is surely right for E t U 2016. 0 Q C d U A Q PacketPg.446 6.E.o Draft notes-from Speakers ATTACHMENT M Roger Henderson,2516 Valencia Ave., San Bernardino, CA: Opponent • The City has torn the city up for a bus system. The question is do the people really want z° it or do they want a safe city, one in which you can drive down and feel safe. r • Businesses have indicated that this bus system will cause them to go out of business. E • It has been noted that many of the buses currently operating now are empty. E • Putting more low-income housing is not ownership. We don't need this. a • What we need is to spend Measure I money, the gas tax, on what it was intended for o which street repair(fixing potholes) and lights. c John Shumway, 2082 Business Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92612: Proponent c 0 0 • Representing the Urban Land Institute(ULI). o • Taking a bold step to introduce a new ordinance that outlines land uses around transit stations with the goal of encouraging high transit usage can be the future roadmap for sustainable communities. • The principles of compact transit districts: connectivity and street patterns, walkability, c 0 place making and building and architecture and street landscaping, diversity of housing T types - are all consistent with a vision of a more compact, pedestrian oriented community. • ULI urges the City to consider those recommendations made by the ULI panel in 2007. w Mott Smith,400 Mt. Washington Dr., Los Angeles, CA 90065: Proponent rn • Inflill Builder and on the Board of the California Infill Builders Federation. • The organization, California Infill Builders Federation, represents small and large companies including major home builders who all have an interest in building exactly the kind of development that the City will be authorizing. • More and more the market is demanding compact, walkable communities. • What the builders have found even in the most troubled housing market that there is still demand in quality and for experience of place. • Every member of their organization is committed to building projects that fit that mold 0 and we are attracted to cities large and small that find a way for making it easy for i developers to do the right thing and harder for developers to do the wrong thing. E E Bob Gardner, Cal State University San Bernardino: Proponent V' • Vice President of Administration and Finance at Cal State University. • Strongly supports this concept,the whole idea of transit development is very good for the Ec University, and they are excited for the positive impact on the university community. • This is something they want and need in terms of building their community for their a students, faculty and staff. 0 L U A a Packet Pg.447 6.E.o Draftnotes-fromSpeakers ATTACHMENT M • The university believes that in context of building a greater community will provide more o N options for students, faculty and staff to provide for shopping and restaurants and creating other opportunities and linking the University to downtown. Z • The University is thinking of a new resident hall across the street from the campus. E • From a personal note, he saw development around transit stations in western DC area. It c became transformational to see businesses grow around new stations and seeing different E business grow around the transit stations. d a 0 Angel Juarez, 2854 N. Pershing Ave., San Bernardino, CA: Proponent c • The Cardinal City Mayor of San Bernardino High School is in support of this project. E • He believes that the transit system will be faster and better in getting to places between y San Bernardino and Loma Linda. o • The project would create less pollution, and get people out of their cars. • It also shows that the city is growing and progressing. Sandra Sandeval, 191 E. 28th Street, San Bernardino, CA: Proponent o 9 • Volunteer at San Bernardino High School d • Thanked the Council for approving the movie theatre project so that she didn't have to W travel far away from the City. • This is a great opportunity for the City to grow. • Her friend who travels to the Arts Institute will have a faster way of traveling to school until she graduates. • Indicated that she would like to come to downtown more using the new bus. U U Arellana Calvillo, 3624 N. Mayfield Ave., San Bernardino, CA 92405: Proponent 3 CL • Is going to be a Junior as San Bernardino High School -this is going to help students, c U • She spoke about her personal experience at the age 4 or 5 years old, when her Mom was .2 pregnant with her brother,traveling to the hospital on the bus. a' w • This would really make it easier for students, parents and for people who work to travel on the bus and a great opportunity for the City of San Bernardino. E Andrew Machen, 174 E. Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92418: Proponent w' • Lives in the City s first live work loft development downtown and said its a great way to = live,just wonderful. E • He wanted only to say-Just Do It. a v L U A Q Packet Pg. 448 6.E.o Draft notes-fromSpeakers ATTACHMENT M Jose Nievez, 2652 Del Rosa Ave, Apt. 201, San Bernardino, CA: Proponent o N r • Speaking on behalf of San Bernardino High School, he z6 fully supports the bus transportation project. 0 • He believes San Bernardino is making our city a better place. The other cities don't have �E what we have-we are trying to be up there by staying on top of things. • As one of the oldest cities in the region, this would revitalize our city. It would be easier a for people and commuters to take the bus. $ • The project would help the safety of our streets with increased lighting and developing our city streets. Increased people on our streets from the new bus system would make E our streets safer. c Peggy Long,4973 State Street, San Bernardino CA 92407: Opponent o • She went to a community meeting, she gave her opinion, but she was not listened too. The project was set and her input was ignored. • She wants to know what our community is doing to assist existing businesses, how do r 0 they feel about this. w • If the existing business are going to leave,then we are not doing ourselves any justice. • We can't compare this project to Victoria Gardens, as the setting was built around existing old vineyard. The housing was built around an old vineyard. This project is trying to build homes around existing business and will not work. rn c Lori Statnaker, 7204 Clydes Date St. Highland,CA 92346: Opponent • Lives in the City of Highland, owns a house in San Bernardino since 1965 and owns a business in the City of San Bernardino. • She spoke at a Council meeting in May 2012, asking how a City can take up a project a c when the City is out of money. • She's heard the same grievances in the past two to three years. Street lights, potholes, graffiti, and landscaping-when are we going to do what the City needs today? ° • Looking towards the future is good. It's always great to be visionaries,but not if we can't handle what we have now. E • Businesses along Hospitality will be impacted with the removal of left hand turns. E N • The Hilton is trying to do everything possible to stay in business and keep employees working. Since construction has started making it in business is difficult. • Council seems to be going out of the way to ignore the existing businesses. E s • We need to do everything possible to help our existing businesses. Help the one's that are here now. a d U tV Q Packet Pg.449 6.E.o Draft notes-from Speakers ATTACHMENT M Joe Arnett, 1681 Echo, San Bernardino, CA 92404: Opponent o • He believes that the City is doing things to try to make things better,but when millions of z° dollars are being invested into projects that are not going to do that he questions the logic d of the decision makers. E • We have a Council that isn't taking any productive action for the City. • Taxes were raised to upgrade the water treatment facility. Pouring money into projects Q that won't benefit most of the tax paying residents isn't any good. o • Public transportation and bus cards are handouts. U • When street lights aren't on and potholes aren't filled, taxes are being raised to upgrade E infrastructure, and you do things like this,he takes offense to the situation. o d d 0 �o �r c O N d C 3 C v U U 3 CL c U 3 IL `o A E E 3 w C N E t U A Q r v 1 E L V IV Q Packet Pg. 450 t 6.E.p CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO Community Development Department—Planning Division Interoffice Memorandum TO: Margo Wheeler,AICP,Community Development Director FROM: Mario Suarez,AICP, Principal Planner o N SUBJECT: Measure I-sbX Project Snapshot c Z DATE: June 21,2012 m E v On November 7, 1989, the voters approved Measure I, Ordinance No. 89-1 to allow the San Bernardino E County Transportation Authority, SANBAG, to collect a one-half of one percent retail transactions and 4 use tax. The duration of the transactions and use tax was for 20 years starting on April 1, 1990 and ending on March 31, 2010. SANBAG, is designated as the implementing and managing authority for v Measure I funds expenditures. An Expenditure Plan provides a full estimate of revenues and how the funds are going to be distributed by region, and was adopted as part of Ordinance No. 89-1. San E CL Bernardino is in the San Bernardino Valley Distribution Subarea. Other major subarea expenditure plans 2 include: Cajon Pass and Mountain/Desert. o On January 3, 1990, Ordinance 89-1 was amended by Ordinance 90-1 to address the implementation of the transaction and use sales tax through the State Board of Equalization. On April 1, 2010, the voters approved an extension to Measure I for another 30 years pursuant to new San Bernardino Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 04-01. The expiration of this new ordinance is on March 31,2040. o N Ordinance No. 04-01 includes Mandatory Taxpayer Safeguards including an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee(ITOC). The ITOC is charged with ensuring the funds from Measure I are spent in 0 accordance with Ordinance No. 04-01 and the Expenditure Plan. Periodic financial audits are permitted E to be used by the ITOC. Details of the ITOC are on Page 22, Exhibit B of Attachment 4 within the back- up material of this memorandum. _ N Q SANBAG, has broad, but specific authority to implement and administer Measure I funds. Pursuant to c Ordinance No. 04-01, SANBAG shall impose and collect the tax, and shall administer the Expenditure w Plan consistent with the provisions and priorities of the Expenditure Plan and consistent with the authority cited in Ordinance No. 04-01. There are eight (8) expenditure categories administered by SANBAG. Only one, Local Street Projects z requires City Council approval through a Five-Year Plan. Expenditure of Local Street Project funds shall be based upon a Five-Year Plan adopted annually by the governing body of each jurisdiction after being E made available for public review and comment. Local Street Project funds shall be disbursed to local @ jurisdictions upon receipt of the annually adopted Five- Year Plan. The local adopted Five-Year Plan shall be consistent with local,regional,and state transportation plans(Page 7,item F of Attachment 4). d E Each of the expenditure categories are broken down by name and percentage as set by Ordinance No. 04- R 01. The local streets projects are decided through Council approval of a Five-Year plan from local 4 ^ jurisdictions. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 04-01, local streets represents 20% of Measure I funds. The City's Public Works Department submits to Mayor and Common Council a recommendation for the proposed local street project expenditures, which is also part of the City's Capital Improvements Plan (Attachments 7, 8 and 9). Once the Mayor and Common Council approves the local street projects Five Year plan,it is then submitted to SANBAG for final approval by the Board of Directors G,E.p Pursuant to Ordinance No. 04-01, approved by the voters, Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Services is another category of Measure I funds. This category represents 2% of Measure I expenditures set by Ordinance (Exhibit A, Pages 12 and 15 of Attachment 4). Ordinance No. 04-01, deems SANBAG the decision body in allocating all eight categories: SCHEDULE D San Bernardino Valley Subarea Expenditure Plan Measure c Project Category "I^ Amount rJ Percentage 0 Freeway Projects(See Schedule D1) 29% $ 1,311 Million z Freeway Interchange Projects(See Schedule 02) 11% $ 497 Million w E Major Street Projects`(See Schedule D3) 20% $ 814 Million Local Street Projects(See Schedule D4) 20% $ 904 Million E MetrolinklRail Service(See Schedule D5) 80/0 $ 362 Million Express BuslBus Rapid Transit Service'(See Schedule D6) 2% $ 180 Million o U Senior and Disabled Transit Service 8% $ 362 Million c v Traffic Management Systems $ 90 Million E CL Total San Bernardino Valley Subarea Llasaure"I"Revenue 100% $4,520 Million —°y m Percentage NstMbWon adjusts to serve transportation needs. Amount shown is average over 30•year Measure. O to a The pie-chart shows how the Measure is broken out throughout the o Valley Sub-region taken from A SANBAG's 10-year Delivery Plan. In addition, below is a list of c the Measure Pass Through for San E Bernardino over the past four fiscal 0 years. r N O. R Loco]Pass Through rn FY 11-12 $ 2,612,401.38 — FY 10-11 $ 2,469,224.39 FY 09-10 $ 2,279,221.87 ai FY 08-09 $ 2,616,804.09 Tra SM V ment 2% Express BusIBRT 2% Z r C d The mayors and council members of 24 cities and five members from the County Board of Supervisors govern SANBAG. Agency staff members provide input at monthly Technical Advisory Committee m meetings. There are three Technical Advisory Committees that include: Planning Directors Techincal a Forum (PDTF), Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) and the City/County Managers m Technical Advisory Committee (CCMTAC). The Technical Advisory Committees provide input to E SANBAG staff for recommendations to the Board of Directors. Members of the SANBAG Board of Directors also serve on five Policy Committees including Administrative, Mountain/Desert, Commuter Rail/Transit, Plans & Programs, and Major Projects. Elected officials make decisions at monthly Board of Directors meetings. The 29 member agencies/Board of Directors all have a vote in administering transportation funding including those in Ordinance No. 04-01. Packet Pg.452 6.E.p Measure I: Snapshot Back-up Material—by Planning Division .. California State legislature: In late 1980s, California State Legislature authorized county transportation authorities to enact local option sales tax measures for transportation improvements (Division 19, Section 180000, Public Utilities Code,and Section 7252.16 of the o Revenue and Taxation Code.). Measure I History: z6 • In 1989, the San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I, authorizing c SANBAG to impose a one-half percent of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in E the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the county of San Bernardino (Page 1, Section IV, Attachment 1). E • Duration—20 years from April 1, 1990 through March 31,2010. a • SANBAG's Board of Directors serve as the decision making authority for expenditures (Page 1, o Section II.C.,Attachment 1). v • Revenues can only be used for transportation improvements and traffic management programs v authorized in the Expenditure Plan set forth in Ordinance No. 89-1 (Page 1, Attachment 2) and E CL boundary map of Measure 1. o • Local distribution of funds for streets and roads are based on a per capita basis using the most > recent Department of Finance population estimates (Page 1, Local Distribution Formula Section, o Attachment 2). • City and County Projects are expended through a Five- Year capital improvement plan adopted by city councils and Board of Supervisors(Pages 1 and 2 of SANBAG Policy,Attachment 3). Measure I Current Status: c • In November 4, 2004, Ordinance No. 04-01 was approved by the electorate (80% voter approval) (Attachment 4). • The new Measure I extends the one-half of one percent retail transaction and use tax for 30 years, o April 1,2010 through March 31,2040(Page 2, Section V,Attachment 4). E w • Is referred to as Measure 12010-2040 to distinguish it from the first Measure I. • Revenues from the one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax used for transportation t planning,design,construction,operation&maintenance(Page 1,Preamble,Attachment 4). a • Schedule D and D6 are part of Ordinance No. 04-01 - lays out the percentages and amounts to be c spent by Measure I. See excerpt of Schedule D and D6 on Page 12 & 15 Exhibit A,Attachment 4 for further details) Q • Independent Oversight Taxpayer Committee (IOTC) conducts bi-annual fiscal and compliance audits(Page 22,Exhibit B of Attachment 4). d • SANBAG Board of Directors per Measure I "Responsibilities" are in SANBAG Policy 34100 and fact sheet listing who governs SANBAG is in Attachment 5. Z • April 1, 2009, SANBAG Board adopted Strategic Plan —policy framework of Measure I projects m and programs(Attachment 6-Available On-Line-htta://www.sanba2.ca.zov/fundinp/mi.htmi E U R City of San Bernardino: Q • Five-Year capital improvement plan submitted by City of San Bernardino is a requirement for allocation of Measure I"Local Street Projects" funds only. See recent MCC actions in Attachments U 7, 8,&9. m Source: Measure I Center provided on-line at the SANBAG website referenced in this document. Packet Pg. 453 6.E.p Attachments: Attachment 1: Ordinance 89-1 (Measure 1)&Measure I Sub Area Boundaries Map Attachment 2: SANBAG 89-1 Expenditure Plan Attachment 3: SANBAG Policy 34105: Five-Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Pass Through N Funds 6 z Attachment 4: Ordinance No.04-01 (also known as Measure 12010-2040) c m E Attachment 5: Policy 34100=`Responsibilities"and Who Governs SANBAG Sheet a m Attachment 6: Measure 12010-2040 Strategic Plan Part 1 and Part 2 is available on line at the following link: 0 U http://www.sanbag.ca.eov/fundin2/n-i.htmi d Attachment 7: MCC Resolution#2010-340—Five-Year CIP—Measure I Local Expenditures FY-2010- o 2015 d d Attachment 8:MCC Resolution#2011-216—Five-Year CIP—Includes Measure I Local Expenditures FY-2011-2016 Attachment 9: MCC Resolution9:#2011-297—Five-Year CIP for Measure I—Local Expenditures FY- 2011-2016 T 0 N v O E d O t N CL 10 C d 7 N 10 d Z C d E t U IV Q C d E L U m Q G Packet Pg.454 6.E.p ATTACHMENT FSa Bernardino Associated Governments INo.:rd:in a n 89-1 Adopted by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Revised New August 2, 1989 8/2/89 ! o San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Revision Transportation Expenditure Plan and Retail No 0 Z Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance c Table of Contents E I Summary I Definitions I Authont I Imposition of Retail Transactions&Use Tax I Purposes I Bonding Authority I Maintenance of C Effort I Administration of Plans I Administrative Costs I Annual Aooroonations Limit I Effective&Operative Date sl Election I W SeverabiliN I Passed&Adopted I Valley Expenditure Plan I Mountain/Desert Expenditure Plan I Revision History E d 0 ° V The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority ordains as follows: E a SECTION 1. SUMMARY.This ordinance provides for the imposition of a retail transactions and 0 d use tax of one-half percent, the authority to issue limited tax bonds, the administration of the tax > proceeds, a county transportation expenditure plan, and the establishment of an appropriations o limit. v N SECTION II. DEFINITIONS.The following definitions shall apply in this ordinance: c A. Expenditure Plan. 'The Expenditure Plan" means the San Bernardino County Transportation ° Expenditure Plan (adopted as part of this Ordinance) including any future amendments thereto. d B. "County"means the County of San Bernardino. o E m C. "AUTHORITY" means the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority. The San Bernardino County Transportation Commission has been designated to serve as the Authority o under the provisions of Public Utilities Code Section 180050. w CL m c SECTION III.AUTHORITY.This ordinance is enacted pursuant to the provisions of Division 19 U) (commencing with Section 180000)of the Public Utilities Code. v N SECTION IV. IMPOSITION OF RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX. Upon voter approval m of the same, the Authority shall impose, in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino, a retail transactions and use tax(referred to as"the tax")at the rate of z one-half of one percent(0.5%)for a period of twenty(20)years. The tax shall be imposed by the Authority in accordance with Section 180201 of the Public Utilities Code and Part 1.6 m (commencing with Section 7251)of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The provisions E of Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 7261 and 7262 are hereby incorporated herein by @ reference as though fully set forth herein. The tax shall be in addition to any other taxes Q authorized by law, including any existing or future state or local sales tax or transactions and use tax. d E s SECTION V. PURPOSES.The purposes for which the tax revenues may be used shall be for transportation purposes only and may include, but are not limited to, the administration of this a division, including legal actions related thereto and costs of the initial preparation and election, the construction, maintenance, improvements, and operation of local streets, roads, and + highways, state highways and freeways, public transit systems including rail, and related I Packet Pg.455 ATTACHMENT ® purposes. These purposes include expenditures for planning, environmental reviews, engineering and design costs, and related right-of-way acquisition. They also include expenditures including, but not limited to, debt service on bonds and expenses in connection with issuance of bonds. SECTION VI. BONDING AUTHORITY. Upon voter approval of the tax, the Authority shall have o the power to sell or issue limited tax bonds in the aggregate principle at any one time in the N amount outstanding of$500 million to carry out the transportation projects described in the Expenditure Plan. o Z c SECTION VII. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT. The Authority, by the enactment of this Ordinance, intends the additional funds provided government agencies by this chapter to supplement existing local revenues being used for street and highway purposes. The government agencies shall E maintain their existing commitment of local transportation related funds for transportation C purposes pursuant to this Ordinance, and the Authority shall enforce this Section by appropriate a actions. ° 0 U SECTION VIII.ADMINISTRATION OF PLANS.The Authority shall impose and collect the tax, d shall allocate revenues derived from the tax, and shall administer the Expenditure Plan attached E to this Ordinance, consistent with the provisions and priorities of the Expenditure Plan, and o consistent with the Authority cited herein. m 0 SECTION IX.ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.The Authority shall expend only that amount of the funds generated from the tax for staff support, audit, administrative expenses, and contract °r services that are necessary and reasonable to carry out its responsibilities, and in no case shall the funds expended for salaries and benefits exceed one percent(1%)of the annual amount of revenue raised by the tax. The Authority may enter into compensation arrangements, retirement c and other benefit plans, and contractual or regular employee status provisions as it finds .2 T necessary, which may differ from those provided by the San Bernardino Associated Governments "> and the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission. After providing for necessary � countywide administrative costs, a proportionate share of administrative costs shall be made o available for administration of the mountain-desert expenditure plan. E d SECTION X.ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT. Pursuant to Section 4 of Article XIII.B of the o California Constitution and Public Utilities Code Section180202, an appropriations limit of$250 m million is established for the Authority for each fiscal year. The appropriations limit shall be m subject to adjustment as provided by law. m SECTION Xl. EFFECTIVE AND OPERATIVE DATES. Subject to voter approval, this ordinance shall take effect immediately at the close of the polls on November 7, 1989, and shall become m operative on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 120 days after adoption of the ordinance. Prior to the operative date of the ordinance, the Authority shall contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform all functions incidental to the administration and ? operation of the ordinance. E L SECTION XII. ELECTION. The Authority requests the Board of Supervisors to call an election for voter approval of the attached proposition (Measure 1),which election shall be held on November 4 7, 1989, and consolidated with other elections to be held on that same date. The election shall be called and conducted in the same manner as provided by law for the conduct of elections by a county. The sample ballot to be mailed to the voters shall be the full proposition as set forth in this E ordinance, and the voter information handbook shall include the Expenditure Plan.Approval of v the attached proposition, and imposition of the tax, shall require the vote of a majority of the =° electors voting on the attached proposition at the election described in this section. a Packet Pg. 556 B.E.p ATTACHMENT Q SECTION XIII. SEVERABILITY. If any tax or provision of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, that holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining taxes or provisions, and the Commission declares that it would have passed each part of this ordinance irrespective of the validity of any other part. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority on 812/89 by 0 rt the following vote: 0 z AYES: Walker, Mikels, Riordan, Pearson, Speyers,Aguiar, Cisneros, Boyles, Grant, Kitchen, c Tully, Digneo, Rhinehart, Dastrup, Brown, Longville, Dobler, Scarpa, Wormser, Busby, and E Vandersall. 0 c m NOES: NONE G d v ABSENT: Hammock, Turoci, Christensen, Holcomb 0 U ABSTENTION: Pope 0. 0 m d 0 REVISION HISTORY Revision Revisions Adopted No. 0 Ado tad b the San Bernardino Co=Uy Trans pormtion Authority 06/02189 o O O T) > d O E d O L N CL m c to m N O d z C N E t U Q C N E t U N Q Packet 457 6.E.p ATTACHMENT San Bernardino Associated Governments OrdinanCe gg_1 No, ,Expenditure Plan (Adopted by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority�''Revised JL New August 2, 1989 8/2/89 0 Expenditure Plan for Transportation Sales Tax to be Administered by the San Bernardino County Transportation Revision O 6 Authority ( Adopted as part of Ordinance No. 89-1 by Said No �. Authority ) E v Important Notice: A hardcopy of this document may not be the document currently in v effect. The current version is always the version on the SANBAG Intranet. E Q a+ v Table of Contents O U Revenue Estimates and Distribution I San Bernardino Valley Proiects iLocal Distribution Formula I City and County Projects Major Street Proiects 1 Commuter Rail Program 1 Elderly and Handicapped Transit Program 1 Traffic Manaoement Plan d Mountain-Desert Area Expenditure Plan I Revision His[ory E 2 O v Revenue Estimates and Distribution.The full estimate of revenues and allocation between c categories is reflected in Schedule A of this Plan. Such revenue estimates are not binding or �n controlling. San Bernardino Valley Projects.The specific categories and freeway projects to be constructed o under this category are recited in Schedules A and B of this Plan. Following adoption of the A ordinance by the voters, the plan may only be amended, if required, by the following process: > X a. Initiation of amendment by the Authority, reciting findings of necessity. o E b.Approval by the board of supervisors. d c. Approval by a majority of the cities constituting a majority of the incorporated population 0 t Cost estimates for such projects are not binding or controlling. m c U Local Distribution Formula.The annual distribution of this category, city and county streets and — roads in the San Bernardino Valley, shall be on a per capita basis using the most recent State Department of Finance population estimates,with the County's portion based upon unincorporated population. Exhibit A reflects the initial estimate of revenues. m City and County Projects. The city and county portions shall be expended pursuant to a 20 year Z overall plan and a five-year project list to be adopted by a resolution by each City Council and the Board of Supervisors, respectively, extended annually for one year, available for public review, to E be first adopted at least 30 days prior to the election. m Major Street Projects. The arterial portion of the San Bernardino Valle Q J 1 P y program shall be expended pursuant to a 20 year overall plan and a five-year project list to be adopted by the Authority, extended annually for one year, available for public review, to be first adopted at least E 30 days prior to the election. Commuter Rail Program. Funds in this category shall be expended as set forth in Schedule C. Q Packet Pg.458 6Ep ATTACHMENT Elderly and Handicapped Transit Program. Funds in this category shall be expended annually for a program of reduced fares and enhanced service for elderly and handicapped transit users, to be developed by the Authority in cooperation with transit service agencies. Traffic Management Plan. For the San Bernardino Valley, the provisions of a Traffic c Management Plan as set forth in Schedule D shall apply. N Mountain-Desert Area Expenditure Plan. Revenues generated in the Mountain-Desert Area z shall be retained and expended in that area pursuant to a separate Expenditure Plan set forth as c Schedule E, which shall be the sole determinant of the program in that area. ° E a c m E Q SCHEDULE A -Transportation Improvement Program c U Line Amount Program 1 1.65Billion Total Funds Available Q. o 2 (.041) Billion (Less 1% administration and 1.5 % Board of Equalization collection) > 3 1.617 Billion Total Available For Plan 4 ( 328) Billion Mountain-Desert Share (Plus 70 Million. State Transportation Improvement LO Program) 5 11.289 Billion Total For San Bernardino Valley c 0 N d O E d SCHEDULE B -San Bernardino Valley Program c CL r N Line age Amount Program m 6 53% 690 Million State Fwy/Hwy/IC/Corridor/Contingencies 7 1780 Construction w m _ m 8 190 Engineering z 9 50 Interchanges/Corridors/park & ride 10 50 Contingencies E _ t 12 1,070 Subtotal w 13 i (280) ISTIP forecast(federal/statefunds) — y 14 110RO Developer Financing E 15 690 Sales Tax Needs m 16 19% 250 Million Local Projects a Q17 12% 150 Million Major Streets 6.E.p ATTACHMENT 18 89/6 100 Million iCommuter Rail 19 69/6 75 Million Elderly& Handicapped Transit, Including Senior Fares 20 2% "ion Traffic Management Implementation and Environmental Enhancement Program c N 6 Z a c SCHEDULE B -SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY PROJECTS E c d Route 1 Segment and Project Description Amount(1989 $'s) E _ Q 1-10 State Route 30 to Yucaipa Blvd. Widen One Lane Each Direction v ((possible HOV) $10 Million 0 U I-10 Los Angeles County Line to 1-15 Widen One Lane Each Direction (HOV) $80 Million c m 1-215 1-10 to State Route 30 Widen One Lane Each Direction, reconstruct $100 Million E nterchanges (Possible HOV) o I-215 IRiverside County line to -10 Widen One Lane Each Direction (HOV) $75 Million y SR30 L.A. County Line to-1-215 Construct Six Lane Freeway (include HOV) $400 Million (plus $150 mil L.A.) Ln SR 60 L.A. County Line to Riverside County Line Widen One Lane Each IlDirection (possible HOV) j$25 Million SR 71 Riverside County Line to L.A. County line. Construct Six Lane Freeway 90 Million 'a (include possible HOV) Total $780 Million D 0 E (Plus advance construction of projects in STIP and subject to delay: SR 30 East, SR 60/71 m interchange, etc. ) 0 r N n. A c U) EXHIBIT A -San Bernardino County Valley Area d Local and Arterial Program 20 Year Estimate 5 N N d *YO Yr. � Agency Fist Yr. Local $'s 20 Yr. Local $'s Local $'s Art. $'s *20 Yr.Total Z Chino $443,218 $14,715,087 $8,829,052 $23,544,139 E Colton F $294,178 F $9,766,880 $5,860,128 $15,627,008 L U Fontana $608,645 F $20,207,338 $12,124,403 $32,331,740 Q Grand Terrace $84,664 $2,810,892 $1,686,535 $4,497,428 Highland F $209,514 $6,955,987 $4,173,592 F$11,129,580 £ r Loma Linda $108,854 $3,614,005 $2,168,403 $5,782,407 ;Montclair $201,321 $6.683,966F F$10,694.345 Q Ontario $969,930 F $32,202,206 $19,321,324 $51,523,530 vi. B,E,p ATTACHMENT Rancho Cucamonga $816,989 F $27,124,465 $16,274,679 $43,399,144 Redlands F $466,628 F $15,492,292 $9,295,375', $24,787,668 Rialto $501,742 $16,658,100 $9,994,860 $26,652,960 San Bernardino $1,199,343 $39,818,818 F $23,891,291 Fs64,710,109 ° Upland $498,621 $16,554,473 $9,932,684 $26,487,156 T (Yucaipa) $452,582 $15,025,969 $9,015,581 $24,041,550 Z Sbdo. Co. $673,770 F $22,369,523 $13,421,714 $35,791,236 c m E $7,530,000 FjiN,000,000 F 000,000 $400,000,000 d E Programming is not based on population, but presumably would be proportionate over the 20 year life of the measure. 0 c m E CL 0 SCHEDULES A AND B -Assumptions/Explanation 2 d _ D Line CD v 1 120 yrs at 5% true growth (inflation not included); first year starts at$50 million 2 required by law and Board Of Equalization (current) 4 Mountain-desert return-to-source, equivalent percent of. STIP available for program o projects w 5 Itotal available for valley 6 see lines 7- 15 0 E _ 7 see separate listing of projects (1989 costs) 8 lengineering and project development at 25% 0 9 1 Program for interchange revisions and corridor preservation m –TO-1 contingency for added projects or cost increases rn 13 STIP funds available for program projects (balance online 4) S ?} 14 conservative estimate of new development financing 16 Idistribution by population to cities and county (for unincorporated)for local needs R 17 arterial/major streets program administered by Authority Z 18 San Bernardino's share of Los Angeles Commuter rail and San Bernardino- Riverside- ac Orange County commuter rail, to be supplemented by any state or bond program; plus E possible short line development within county 19 for program of discounted senior and handicapped fares and transit service enhancements for seniors and handicapped c 20 [including plementation of traffic management program and environmental enhancement program E corridor greenbelts, high occupancy vehicle (HOV) inducements, bike and destrian trails, open space plan development, and air quality-related inducements luding alternate fuel vehicle programs. PasSl et.PV-J 1 6.E.p ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE C -COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM Commuter rail expenditures shall include: o N Purchase or other preservation of rail rights of way for transportation purposes,with specific focus z upon: c v the San Bernardino-West Valley-Los Angeles corridor E the San Bernardino-Riverside-Orange County corridor c "short lines"and linkages within San Bernardino County m Development of a comprehensive rail transit plan, including consideration of a possible West 'a 0 Valley-Orange County corridor U c m Upon positive findings by an independent consultant or agency of cost efficiency and service E CL effectiveness, adopted by a two-thirds vote of the Authority, excepting the Mountain-Desert o members, expenditures may also include: i ATTACHMENT 4. Local plans should also integrate to regional plans and requirements and should consider growth policies,job-housing balance, and air quality goals. r 0 REVISION HISTORY r Revision Revisions Adopted p No. I Z 0 1 Ado ted by the San Bernardino Country Transportation Authority 08102189 C N E C d E a v 0 0 U C d E CL 0 Z W to0 �o to c 0 .N d 0 E m 0 r N Q R C N N 7 N to d Z r c eu E U u m Q r C d E .0 U x PacketPg.463 6.E.p ATTACHMENT San Bernardino Associated Governments Policy 34105 Adopted by the Board of Directors November 25, Revised 6/4/03 .''..... 1991 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Pass Revision Through Funds INo. 6 ',iTable of Contents z ill Authorities I Requirements I Policies I Revision History I c d E c d E DIVISION 6, FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL PASS THROUGH a d FUNDS ° 0 U I.AUTHORITIES These guidelines are adopted by San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San E Bernardino County Transportation Authority, relating to adoption of Five Year Capital o CL Improvement Plans by local jurisdictions outlining the projects which will be funded by the Measure I Transactions and Use Tax, Local Pass-Through Funds. Responsibilities of the Authority are outlined in Revenue and Taxation Code Part 1.6, Public Utilities Code Division 19, and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Ordinances 89-1 and 90-1. II. REQUIREMENTS Ordinances 89-1 of San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, as approved by the voters in 1989, outlines the following requirements: 0_ t Lh V d 1. The governing body of each jurisdiction receiving Measure I Local Pass Through Funds must annually adopt by resolution a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan/Project List and E a Twenty Year Plan. E 2. Locally adopted plans must be available for public review. - 0 3. Five Year Plans and Twenty Year Plans shall be consistent with other local and regional sv plans. @ C 4. Funds will not be used to replace existing road funding programs or requirements for new rn development to provide for its own road needs. 0 5. In the Mountain/Desert subareas, funds will be allocated 65%to arterial roadways and @ regional needs, 30% to local needs, and 5%to elderly and handicapped transportation services and fare reductions. z III. POLICIES Each local jurisdiction is required to annually adopt a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan which E details the specific projects which will be funded using Measure I Local Pass-Through Funds. Expenditures of Measure I Local Pass Through Funds must be detailed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan and adopted by resolution of the governing body. In developing the Five Year Q Capital Improvement Plans, each jurisdiction shall comply with the following guidance. c d E 1. Five Year Capital Improvement Plans shall specifically identify road improvements, signals, and intersection improvements by street name, boundaries, and project type. a Project types may include pavement overlay, construction, reconstruction, widening, or ® other improvements. Packet Pg.464 6sE.p ATTACHMENT 3 2. In developing the Five Year Capital Improvement Plans, it is recommended that each �./ jurisdiction constrain the total annual amount of the Measure I planned expenditures to 150% of SANBAG's forecasted annual revenue for Measure I Local Pass-Through Funds for the adopting jurisdiction or County subarea, plus any fund balances and/or revenue resulting from bonds secured by Measure I revenue. c 3. Five Year Capital Improvement Plans may include general program categories for pavement management programs, system improvements, and general maintenance. o The maximum total expenditures of all general program categories in any year shall not Z exceed 50 percent of SANBAG's total annual forecast revenue for the jurisdiction or m County subarea. In the Mountain/Desert subareas, the categorical expenditures will be E calculated separately as follows: d E • Regional/Arterial: General program categorical expenditures shall not exceed 50 Q percent of the Regional/arterial Fund. v 0 U • Local Fund: General program categorical expenditures shall not exceed 50 percent of the local Fund. E 0. 0 4. Any single project expenditure in excess of$50,000 shall be listed as an individual > project and shall not be included in a general program category. A project is defined as a o0 specific road improvement, categorical expenditure, or Measure I eligible program activity. N 5. Although not a requirement, SANBAG recommends that Mountain/Desert jurisdictions also list the required 5%elderly and handicapped transit expenditures in their plans to prevent over programming. o .N d O IV. REVISION HISTORY E Revision Revisions Adopted 2 No. 0 Adopted. 11/25191 t 1 Revised Par.III:POLICIES,3 to add"In the Mountain/Desert subareas,the categorical expenditures will 614/03 a be calculated separately as follows: o Regional Arterial,o Local Fund". tp C N 3 N m d Z G d E L U R Q C d E U R Q Packet Pg.465 6.E.p ATTACHMENT4 CMEASURE °P' SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY o ORDINANCE NO. 04-01 0 Z AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUATION OF A ONE-HALF OF ONE d PERCENT RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES AND THE c TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE PLAN Q d v PREAMBLE o V a+ This one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax is statutorily dedicated for E transportation planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance only in San Bernardino 0 County and cannot be used for other governmental purposes or programs. There are specific safeguards in this Ordinance to ensure that funding from the Measure "I" one-half of one percent o transactions and use tax is used in accordance with the specified voter-approved transportation project improvements and programs. These safeguards include: • The specific projects and programs included in the Expenditure Plan will be funded by revenue raised by this transactions and use tax. The transportation Expenditure Plan can be changed only upon approval by a majority of all cities in the County representing a 4 majority of the incorporated population and approval by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors. • An Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee is created to provide for citizen review to E ensure that all Measure "I" funds are spent in accordance with provisions of the Expenditure Plan and Ordinance. o s • Continuation of San Bernardino County's one-half of one percent transactions and use a tax is for transportation programs only and is not intended to replace traditional revenues c generated through locally-adopted development fees and assessment districts. Collection N of the one-half of one percent transactions and use tax will start upon the expiration of d the Existing Tax. m • The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority will continue to seek maximum funding for transportation improvements through State and federal programs. The z Authority will not provide transactions and use tax revenue to any city or to the County unless all transportation revenues currently used by that agency are continued to be used for transportation purposes. E U t6 The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority ordains as follows: 4 SECTION I. SUMMARY. This Ordinance provides for the continued imposition of a retail transactions and use tax of one-half of one percent for local transportation purposes for a period E of thirty (30) years, the authority to issue limited tax bonds secured by such taxes, the administration of the tax proceeds and a county transportation Expenditure Plan. 4 MlOrdinwce-kal Page 1 Packet Pg.466 6.E.p ATTACHMENT SECTION II. MANDATED TAXPAYER SAFEGUARDS. A. Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee. Beginning on April 1, 2010, an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee will be established as specified in Exhibit B of this Ordinance to provide citizen review and to ensure that all Measure "I" funds are spent in accordance with provisions of the Expenditure Plan and Ordinance. Exhibit B contains the ° N specific terms and conditions for an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee and its review of periodic independent financial audits. 6 Z B. Administrative Costs. The Authority shall expend only that amount of funds generated d from the tax that is necessary and reasonable to carry out its responsibilities for audit, E administrative expenses, staff support, and contract services. In no case shall the funds m expended for salaries and benefits exceed one percent (1%)of the annual net amount of revenue E raised by the tax. a v 0 0 C. Maintenance of Effort. The Authority, by the enactment of this Ordinance, intends the additional funds provided government agencies by this measure to supplement existing local revenues being used for street and highway purposes. Transactions and use tax revenue shall E not be used to replace existing road funding programs or to replace requirements for new M 0 development to provide for its own road needs. Under this Measure, funding priorities should be d given to addressing current road needs, easing congestion, and improving roadway safety. o The government agencies shall maintain their existing commitment of transportation funds for street, highway and public transit purposes, and the Authority shall enforce this provision by appropriate actions, including fiscal audits of the local agencies. 0 0 SECTION III. DEFINITIONS. The following definitions shall apply in this Ordinance: d A. "The Expenditure Plan" means the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority W Expenditure Plan (attached as Exhibit A and adopted as part of this Ordinance) including any 0 future amendments thereto. d B. "County" means the County of San Bernardino. 00 N O. C. "Authority" means the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority. The San Bernardino County Transportation Commission has been designated to serve as the Authority under the provisions of Public Utilities Code Section 180050. d w D. "Existing Tax" means the one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax adopted � pursuant to Ordinance No. 89-01 and Ordinance No. 90-01. Z SECTION IV. AUTHORITY. This Ordinance is enacted, pursuant to the provisions of Division 19 0 (commencing with Section 180000) of the Public Utilities Code, and Section 7252.16 of the E z Revenue and Taxation Code. a SECTION V. CONTINUED IMPOSITION OF RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX. Upon voter approval of Measure "I," the Authority shall continue to impose, in the incorporated E and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino, a transactions and use tax for v transportation purposes (referred to as "the tax") at the rate of one-half of one percent (0.5%)for M a period of thirty (30) years beginning April 1, 2010. There shall be no coincidental assessment a of the current tax(which will expire on March 31, 2010)and the tax to be imposed pursuant to this Ordinance. The tax shall be imposed by the Authority in accordance with Section 180201 of the MlOrdinance-kal Page 2 Packet Pg.467 6.E.p ATTACHMENT 4 Public Utilities Code and Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 7261 and 7262 are incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth herein. The tax shall be in addition to any other taxes authorized by law, including any existing or future state or local sales tax or transactions and use tax. 0 N SECTION VI. PURPOSES. Revenues from the tax shall be used for transportation purposes 6 only and may include, but are not limited to, the administration of this division, including legal Z actions related thereto and costs of the initial preparation and election, the construction, E maintenance, improvements, and operation of local streets, roads, and highways, state highways c and freeways, public transit systems including rail, and related purposes. These purposes include expenditures for planning, environmental reviews, engineering and design costs, and related E right-of-way acquisition. Expenditures also include, but are not limited to, debt service on bonds a and expenses in connection with issuance of bonds. 'a 0 U 15 SECTION VII. RETURN TO SOURCE. After deduction of required Board of Equalization fees N and authorized administrative costs, revenues generated from each specified subarea within c San Bernardino County as outlined in the Expenditure Plan will be expended on projects of direct m benefit to that subarea. Revenues will be accounted for separately for each subarea and then d allocated to specified project categories in each subarea. Decisions on how revenues are 0 expended within the subareas will be made by the Authority Board of Directors, based upon recommendations of local representatives. Other than the projects identified in the Cajon Pass v� Expenditure Plan, revenues generated within a subarea shall be expended outside of that subarea only upon approval of two-thirds(2/3)of the jurisdictions within the affected subarea. 0 N SECTION VIII. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT. No revenue generated from the tax shall be used to replace the fair share contributions required from new development. Each local jurisdiction identified in the Development Mitigation Program must adopt a o development financing mechanism within 24 months of voter approval of this Measure "I" that E would: 0 1. Require all future development to pay its fair share for needed transportation facilities as a N result of the development, pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. and as determined by the Congestion Management Agency. rn 2. Comply with the Land Use/Transportation Analysis and Deficiency Plan provisions of the Congestion Management Program pursuant to California Government Code Section 65089. m d The Congestion Management Agency shall require fair share mitigation for regional transportation facilities through a Congestion Management Program update to be approved within 12 months of Z voter approval of this Measure'T" v E s U SECTION IX. ADMINISTRATION OF PLANS. The Authority shall impose and collect the tax, °. and shall administer the Expenditure Plan consistent with the provisions and priorities of the Expenditure Plan and consistent with the authority cited herein. c m E r SECTION X. BONDING AUTHORITY. Upon voter approval of Measure "I", the Authority shall o have the power to sell or issue, from time to time, on or before the collection of taxes, bonds, or a other evidence of indebtedness, including, but not limited to, capital appreciation bonds, in the aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding of not to exceed the estimated proceeds of the tax, as determined by the Expenditure Plan, and to secure such indebtedness solely by MlOrdinmce kal Page 3 Packet Pg. 468 6.E.p ATTACHMENT way of future collection of taxes, for capital outlay expenditures for the purposes set forth in Section V hereof, including the carrying out of transportation projects described in the Expenditure Plan. SECTION XI. ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT. The annual appropriations limit has been N established pursuant to Ordinance 89-01 pursuant to Section 4 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution and Section 180202 of the Public Utilities Code. The appropriations limit has and o shall be subject to adjustment as provided by law. Z c a+ E v SECTION XII. EFFECTIVE AND OPERATIVE DATES. Subject to voter approval, this Ordinance shall become operative on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more E than 110 days after adoption of this Ordinance. Prior to the operative date of this Ordinance, the a Authority shall contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform all functions incidental to the administration and operation of this Ordinance. c 0 d SECTION XIII. ELECTION. The Authority requests the Board of Supervisors to call an election CL for voter approval of the attached proposition Measure"I" (Exhibit C), which election shall be held 2 on November 2, 2004, and consolidated with other elections to be held on that same date, that m the measure retains its designation as Measure "I," and that it appear first in order on the local o San Bernardino County ballot before all other local measures. The election shall be called and conducted in the same manner as provided by law for the conduct of elections by a county. The v� sample ballot to be mailed to the voters shall be the full proposition as set forth in this Ordinance, and the voter information handbook shall include the entire Expenditure Plan. Approval of the ,..� attached proposition and the imposition of the tax shall require the affirmative vote of 2/3rds of the o electors voting on the attached proposition at the election described in this section. y SECTION XIV. EXPENDITURE PLAN AMENDMENTS. The Expenditure Plan may only be o amended by the following process: E m 1. Beginning in 2015, and at least every ten years thereafter, the Authority shall review and, where necessary, propose revision to the Expenditure Plan. Such review shall consider o recommendations from local governments, transportation agencies and interest groups, and the Lu general public. m 2. The Authority shall notify the cities/towns and Board of Supervisors of the proposed revision and initiation of an amendment, reciting findings of necessity. v 3. Actions of the city/town councils and Board of Supervisors to approve or to oppose the amendment shall be formally communicated to the Authority within 60 days of notice of initiation @ of amendment. a 4. The boundaries of subareas shall be amended only by unanimous approval of all the jurisdictions in the subareas where an amendment is proposed to include or exclude territory. Z 5. Approval of the amendment by a majority of the cities/towns constituting a majority of the incorporated population provided, however, that any amendment of the Victor Valley Expenditure E Plan (Schedule E) shall also require a two-thirds vote of the jurisdictions within the Victor Valley subarea. m 6. Approval of the amendment by the Board of Supervisors. a 7. Approval of the amendment by the Authority. E s SECTION XV. SEVERABILITY. If any tax or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held m invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, that holding shall not affect the a validity or enforceability of the remaining taxes or provisions, or the existing tax and the Authority declares that it would have passed each part of this Ordinance irrespective of the validity of any �- other part. M10rdinwee-1W Page 4 Packet Pg.469 ATTACHMENT SECTION XVI. THE EXISTING TAX. Nothing in the Ordinance is intended to modify, repeal, alter or increase the Existing Tax. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply solely to the retail transactions and use tax adopted herein and not to the collection or administration of the Existing Tax. 0 N APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority at its meeting on June 2, 2004 by the following vote: o z AYES: Alexander, Burgnon, Dale, Hertzmann, Ulloa, Norton-Perry, Chastain, Nuaimi, Cortes, Lindley, McCallon, Christman, Eaton,Valentine, Ovitt, Gilbreath, Wilson, Bagley, a Rothschild, Riddell, Cook, Biane, Hansberger, Postmus,Aguiar, Young d NOES: None E a ABSENT: Nehmens,Valles, Pomierski "a 0 ABSTENTION: None r c N By: E CL William J. Alexander, Chairman o San Bernardino County Transportation Authority > d 0 v Attested: Vicki Watson Clerk of the Board c .N .5 N O E m 0 L N Q C G to d N nl N i C d E L U O Q C d E L V Q O MlOrdinance-kal Page 5 Packet Pg.470 6.E.p ATTACHMENT4 Exhibit A Transportation Expenditure Plan 0 Revenue Estimates and Distribution. Allocation of revenue authorized by Ordinance r No. 04-01 is established within this Expenditure Plan. Funds shall be allocated by percentage of d the actual revenue received. An estimate of revenues and allocation among categories is Z reflected in Schedule A—Transportation Improvement Program. The estimated revenue is based upon 2004 value of money and is not binding or controlling. E v c d Return to Source. After deduction of required Board of Equalization fees and authorized E costs, revenues generated from each specified subarea within San Bernardino County will be 4 expended on projects of direct benefit to that subarea. Revenues will be accounted for o separately for each subarea and then allocated to specified project categories. Decisions on how L) revenues are expended within the subareas will be made by the Authority Board of Directors, based upon recommendation of local representatives. d E CL 0 Subarea Identification. The San Bernardino Valley Subarea will include the cities of Chino, Chino Hills, Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Highland, Loma Linda, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho d Cucamonga, Redlands, Rialto, San Bernardino, Upland and Yucaipa and unincorporated areas in the east and west portions of the San Bernardino valley urbanized area. The Mountain-Desert v area will include the following subareas: (1)The North Desert Subarea, which includes the City of Barstow and surrounding unincorporated areas; (2) The Colorado River Subarea, which includes the City of Needles and the surrounding unincorporated areas of the East Desert; (3) The Morongo Basin Subarea, which includes the City of Twentynine Palms, Town of Yucca Valley, o and surrounding unincorporated areas; (4) The Mountain Subarea, which includes the City of Big Mn Bear Lake and surrounding unincorporated areas of the San Bernardino Mountains; and (5) the 0 Victor Valley Subarea, which includes the Cities of Adelanto, Hesperia, and Victorville; the Town of of Apple Valley; and surrounding unincorporated areas including Wrightwood. 0 E d Contribution from New Development. No revenue generated from the tax shall be o used to replace the fair share contributions required from new development. w a Requirement for Annual Financial and Compliance Audits of Measure "I" Funds. The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority and each agency receiving an 0 allocation of Measure "I" revenue authorized in this Expenditure Plan shall undergo an annual financial audit performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and d government auditing standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. � Compliance audits also shall be conducted to ensure that each agency is expending funds in z accordance with the provisions and guidelines established for Measure"I" revenue. d Cajon Pass Expenditure Plan. Three percent of the revenue generated in the San Bernardino Valley Subarea and the Victor Valley Subarea will be reserved in advance of other allocations specified in this plan in an account for funding of the 1-15/1-215 Interchange in Devore, 1-15 widening through Cajon Pass, and truck lane development. Cajon Pass serves as the major transportation corridor connecting the two urbanized areas within San Bernardino County and is in need of the identified improvements. These improvements are critical E components to intra-county travel for residents of both the Victor Valley and San Bernardino m Valley. Projects to be constructed from the Cajon Pass Expenditure Plan are listed in a Schedule C. O MlOrdinance-kal Page 6 PacketPg.471 6.E.p ATTACHMENT San Bernardino Valley Subarea Expenditure Plan. In that area described as the d.- Valley Subarea, project categories shall be established as specified below. The San Bernardino Valley Subarea Expenditure Plan is illustrated in Schedule D. A. State and Federal Transportation Funds. A proportional share of projected state and o federal transportation funds shall be reserved for use solely within the Valley subarea. N 0 B. Revenue Estimates. Tax revenues generated by Ordinance No. 04-01 for the Valley subarea Z over a thirty year period are estimated to be $4,520 million. Approximately$881 million in state d and federal funds and approximately $777 million in contributions from new development are E projected for the area over this period, for an estimated total Valley area revenue of $6,178 c million for transportation improvements. Revenue estimates are not binding or controlling. E C. Freeway Projects. 29% of revenue collected in the San Bernardino Valley Subarea shall o fund freeway projects within the San Bernardino Valley Subarea. Projects to be constructed with Freeway Projects funds are listed in Schedule D1. Cost estimates for such projects are not binding or controlling. E CL D. Freeway Interchange Projects. 11% of revenue collected in the Valley Subarea shall fund m Freeway Interchange Projects. Projects to be constructed with Freeway Interchange Projects d funds are listed in Schedule D2. Equitable geographic distribution of projects shall be taken into account over the life of the program. E. Major Street Projects. 20% Over the thirty-year life of Measure "I," the Major Street Projects category will accrue approximately 18% of revenue collected in the Valley. Upon initial collection of revenue, the Major Street Projects category will receive 20%of revenue collected in the Valley. o Effective ten years following initial collection of revenue, the Major Street Projects allocation shall be reduced to no more 17% but to not less than 12% upon approval by the Authority Board of Directors and the Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service allocation shall be increased by a like amount. Amendments beyond those authorized in this section shall require a formal amendment as provided in the Measure"I" Ordinance. Major Street Projects are defined as congestion relief and safety improvements to major streets t° that connect communities, serve major destinations, and provide freeway access. The Major a Street Projects portion of the San Bernardino Valley program shall be expended pursuant to a c five-year project list to be annually adopted by the Authority after being made available for public ') review and comment. Funding priorities shall be given to improving roadway safety, relieving d congestion, street improvements at rail crossings and shall take into account equitable geographic distribution over the life of the program. v F. Local Street Projects. 20% of revenue collected in the Valley Subarea shall be distributed z among local jurisdictions in the Valley Subarea for Local Street Projects. Allocations to local jurisdictions shall be on a per capita basis using the most recent State Department of Finance population estimates for January 1, with the County's portion based upon unincorporated population in the Valley Subarea. Estimates of unincorporated population within the Valley m Subarea shall be determined by the County Planning Department, reconciled with the State Q Department of Finance population estimate for January 1 of each year. c m Local Street Projects are defined as local street and road construction, repair, maintenance and t other eligible local transportation priorities. Local Street Project funds can be used flexibly for any m eligible transportation purpose determined to be a local priority, including local streets, major a highways, state highway improvements, transit, and other improvements/programs to maximize use of transportation facilities. Expenditure of Local Street Project funds shall be based upon a Lam.. Five Year Plan adopted annually by the governing body of each jurisdiction after being made MlOrdinance kaI Page Packet Pg.472 ATTACHMENT available for public review and comment. Local Street Project funds shall be disbursed to local jurisdictions upon receipt of the annually adopted Five Year Plan. The local adopted Five Year Plan shall be consistent with local, regional, and state transportation plans. G. Metrolink/Rail Service. 8% of revenue collected in the Valley Subarea shall fund c Metrolink/Rail Service. Eligible expenditures of Metrolink/Rail Service funds include purchase of additional commuter rail passenger cars and locomotives for use on Metrolink lines serving San Bernardino County; construction of additional track capacity necessary to operate more Z passenger trains on Metrolink lines serving San Bernardino County; construction of additional parking spaces at Metrolink stations in San Bernardino County; and provision of funds to match W State and Federal funds used to maintain the railroad track, signal systems, and road crossings v for passenger rail service in San Bernardino County, construction and operation of a new d passenger rail service between the cities of San Bernardino and Redlands, and construction and E operation of an extension of the Gold Line to Montclair Transit Center for San Bernardino County passengers traveling to San Gabriel Valley cities, Pasadena, and Los Angeles. Projects to be o funded by Metrolink/Rail Service funds are listed in Schedule D5. v c d H. Senior and Disabled Transit Service. 8% of revenue collected in the Valley Subarea shall E fund Senior and Disabled Transit Service. 6% of revenue collected in the Valley Subarea in this o CL category shall be expended to reduce fares and enhance service for senior citizens and persons with disabilities. Eligible expenditures in the Senior and Disabled Transit Service Category shall a include: (1) The provision of funding to off-set a portion of future senior and disabled fare increases that would apply to fixed route, Community Link and complementary paratransit services. (2) The provision of local funds to help off-set operating and capital costs associated with special transit services provided by transit operators, cities and non-profit agencies for seniors and persons with disabilities. (3) At least 2% of the revenue collected in the Valley Subarea in this category will be directed to the creation of a Consolidated Transit Service Agency o which will be responsible for the coordination of transit services provided to seniors and persons T *- with disabilities. I. Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service. 2% Over the thirty-year life of Measure "I," the E Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service category will accrue approximately 4% of revenue collected in the Valley. Upon initial collection of revenue, the Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit o Service category will receive 2% of revenue collected in the Valley. Effective ten years following w initial collection of revenue, the Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service category shall be m increased to at least 5%, but no more than 10% upon approval by the Authority Board of c Directors. The Major Street Projects category shall be reduced by a like amount. Amendments w beyond those authorized in this section shall require a formal amendment as provided by the m Measure"I"Ordinance. m d Funds in this category shall be expended for the development, implementation and operation of express bus and bus rapid transit service, to be jointly developed by the Authority and transit z service agencies serving the Valley Subarea. Eligible projects to be funded by Express Bus/Bus c Rapid Transit Service funds shall include contributions to operating and capital costs associated a+ E with implementing high-speed, express-type bus service in high-density travel corridors. s U IC J. Traffic Management Systems. 2% of revenue collected in the Valley Subarea shall fund a traffic management systems. Eligible projects under this category shall include signal synchronization, systems to improve traffic flow, commuter assistance programs, freeway service patrol, and projects which contribute to environmental enhancement associated with transportation facilities. a MlOrdinmce-kal Page 8 Packet Pg. 773 A17ACHMENT4 Mountain/Desert Expenditure Plan. In that area described as the Mountain/Desert ��- Area, the following Expenditure Plan requirements shall apply. Schedules E, F, G, H, I illustrate estimated revenue and projects to be constructed in each Mountain/Desert subarea. A. State and Federal Transportation Funds. A proportional share of projected state and c federal transportation funds shall be reserved for use solely within the Mountain/Desert subareas. N 6 B. Revenue Estimates. Tax revenues generated by Ordinance No. 04-01 for the Z Mountain/Desert region over a thirty year period are estimated to be $1,250 million. Approximately $165 million in state and federal funds and approximately $369 million in E contributions from new development are projected for the area over this period, for an estimated total Mountain-Desert area revenue of$1,784 million for transportation improvements. Revenue E estimates are not binding or controlling. ¢ d v C. Local Street Projects. 70%of revenue collected within each subarea shall be apportioned 0 for Local Street Projects within each subarea. 2%of revenue collected within each subarea shall be reserved in a special account to be expended on Project Development and Traffic Management Systems. Eligible Project Development and Traffic Management Systems projects a may include, at the discretion of local subarea representatives, costs associated with corridor d studies and project study reports, projects to improve traffic flow and maximize use of d transportation facilities, congestion management, commuter assistance programs, and projects o which contribute to environmental enhancement associated with highway facilities. Expenditure of Project Development and Traffic Management Systems funds shall be approved by the Authority Board of Directors, based upon a recommendation of subarea representatives and the Mountain/Desert Committee. If, after five years of revenue collection and every five years thereafter, the local representatives and the Mountain/Desert Committee make a finding that o Project Development and Traffic Management Systems funds are not required for improvements .2 of benefit to the subarea, then revenue in the Project Management and Traffic Management .5 Systems category may be returned to the general Local Street Projects category. Such return shall be allocated and expended based upon the formula and requirements established in the o general Local Street Projects category. E After reservation of 2% collected in each subarea for Project Development and Traffic Management Systems, the remaining amount of funds in the general Local Street Projects a category shall be allocated to local jurisdictions based upon population (50 percent) and tax generation (50 percent). Population calculations shall be based upon the most current State Department of Finance estimates for January 1 of each year. Estimates of unincorporated population within each subarea shall be determined by the County Planning Department, reconciled with the State Department of Finance population estimate. Tax generation calculations shall be based upon State Board of Equalization data. Schedules E, F, G, H, I reflect the estimate of revenue available for Local Street Projects in each Mountain/Desert subarea. Z Projects in the general Local Street Projects category are defined as local street and road m construction, repair, maintenance and other eligible local transportation priorities. Local E Transportation Project funds may be used flexibly for any eligible transportation purpose @ determined to be a local priority, including local roads, major streets, state highway improvements, transit, including but not limited to, fare subsidies and service enhancements for seniors and persons with disabilities, and other improvements/programs to maximize use of transportation facilities. Expenditure of Local Transportation Project Funds shall be based upon E the Five Year Plan adopted annually by resolution of the governing body of each jurisdiction after being made available for public review and comment. Local Street Project funds shall be w disbursed to local jurisdictions upon receipt of the annually adopted Five Year Plan. The locally Q adopted Five Year Plans shall be consistent with other local, regional, and state transportation plans. MlOrdinwce-kal Page 9 Packet Pg.474 6.E.p ATTACHMENT D. Major Local Highway Projects. 25% of revenue collected within each subarea shall be `v reserved in a special account to be expended on Major Local Highway Projects of benefit to the subarea. Major Local Highway Projects are defined as major streets and highways serving as primary routes of travel within the subarea, which may include State highways and freeways, where appropriate. Major Local Highway Projects funds can be utilized to leverage other state and federal funds for transportation projects and to perform advance planning/project reports. ° N Expenditure of Major Local Highway Projects funds shall be approved by the Authority Board of Directors, based upon a recommendation of subarea representatives and the Mountain/Desert 6 Committee. If, after five years of revenue collection and every five years thereafter, the local Z representatives and the Mountain/Desert Committee make a finding that Major Local Highway v Projects funds are not required for improvements of benefit to the subarea, then revenue in the E Major Local Highway Projects category may be returned to jurisdictions within the subarea. Such m return shall be allocated and expended based upon the formula and requirements established in E the general Local Street Projects category. Q m 0 0 E. Senior and Disabled Transit Service. 5%of revenue collected within each subarea shall be reserved in an account for Senior and Disabled Transit Service. Senior and Disabled Transit is c defined as contributions to transit operators for fare subsidies for senior citizens and persons with E disabilities or enhancements to transit service provided to seniors and persons with disabilities. °- 0 In the Victor Valley subarea, the percentage for Senior and Disabled Transit Service shall d increase by .5% in 2015 with additional increases of .5% every five years thereafter to a 'm maximum of 7.5%. Such increases shall automatically occur unless each local jurisdiction within the subarea makes a finding that such increase is not required to address unmet transit needs of senior and disabled transit users. In the North Desert, Colorado River, Morongo Basin, and Mountain Subareas, local representatives may provide additional funding beyond 5% upon a finding that such increase is required to address unmet transit needs of senior and disabled transit services. All increases above the 5% initial revenue collected for Senior and Disabled o Transit Service shall come from the general Local Street Projects category of the subarea. d Expenditure of Senior and Disabled Transit Service funds shall be approved by the Authority IX Board of Directors, based upon recommendation of subarea representatives and the o d Mountain/Desert Committee. F. Mountain/Desert Committee. The Mountain-Desert Committee of the Authority shall remain L N in effect and provide oversight to implementation of the Mountain/Desert Expenditure Plan. C- m c in d N 10 d Z E d E s U N Q C d E t U 10 Q C MIOrdinance-kal Page 10 Packet Pg.475 6.E.p ATTACHMENT Measure "I" Transportation Expenditure Plan Schedules SCHEDULE A Countywide Measure "I" Revenue and Distribution o N I Estimated Countywide Measure "I" Distribution Amount 6 c Cajon Pass Expenditure Plan d (3% of San Bernardino Valley Subarea and Victor Valley Subarea $ 170 Million E Revenues-See Schedule C) d E Total San Bernardino Valley Subarea Expenditure Plan m (See Schedule D) $4,520 Million c U Total Mountain-Desert Expenditure Plan $ 1,250 Million d Victor Valley Subarea (See Schedule E) $ 852 Million E OL North Desert Subarea (See Schedule F) $ 95 Million m Mountains Subarea (See Schedule G) $ 119 Million p Morongo Basin Subarea (See Schedule H) $ 125 Million LO Colorado River Subarea (See Schedule 1) $ 59 Million c o N d O E SCHEDULE B g 0 Transportation Improvement Revenues H Q. R c Total Countywide Transportation Revenues Amount U) d Estimated Countywide Measure "1' Revenue $ 6,120 Million N (Less 1%Administration and 2% Board of Equalization Collection Charge) ($ 180) Million Countywide Measure "1' Revenue Available for Transportation Projects $ 5,940 Million Z (See Schedule A) c CD Estimated State and Federal Revenues $ 1,106 Million E r U Estimated Contributions from New Development $ 1,146 Million Total Estimate Revenue Available for Transportation Projects $ 8,192 Million a C d E t U R Q MlOrdinance-kal Page 11 Packet Pg.476 6.E.p ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE C Cajon Pass Expenditure Plan Project Description Amount o 1-15 Widening and Improvement through Cajon Pass $ 170 Million Devore Interchange Widening and Improvements at 1-1511-215 $ 40 Million z 1-15 Dedicated Truck Lane Development $ 20 Million Total Cajon Pass Projects Cost $ 230 Million a Cajon Pass Measure "I" Revenue $ 170 Million E State and Federal Revenues $ 60 Million E Total Cajon Pass Projects Revenues $ 230 Million Q v a O U c d E a O d SCHEDULED p San Bernardino Valley Subarea Expenditure Plan LO Measure Project Category "I" Amount c Percentage T Freeway Projects(See Schedule D1) 29% $ 1,311 Million IY Freeway Interchange Projects (See Schedule D2) 11% $ 497 Million E Major Street Projects' (See Schedule D3) 20% $ 814 Million w Local Street Projects (See Schedule D4) 20% $ 904 Million ° .0 N Metrolink/Rail Service (See Schedule D5) 8% $ 362 Million Q. m c Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service'(See Schedule D6) 2% $ 180 Million Senior and Disabled Transit Service 8% $ 362 Million � N Traffic Management Systems 2% $ 90 Million y Total San Bernardino Valley Subarea Measure"I" Revenue 100% $4,520 Million z Percentage distribution adjusts to serve transportation needs. Amount shown is average over 30-year Measure. d E L ° N L. a i+ C d E L V R a MlOrdinance-kal Page 12 Packet Pg. 477 6.E.p ATTACHMENT FIGURE D San Bernardino Valley Subarea Expenditure Plan 0 Senior and Disabled Transit Service 8% Traffic Management Systems 2% N T Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service 2% ,i �'�' 6 Freeway Projects 29% w Metrolink/Rail Service 8% �,�i�i�i�;�i� E c E YY a d 0 Local Street Projects 20% U r c E a 0 > 0 Freeway Interchange Projects 11% CD y ....::::.. Major Street Projects 20% r 0 N d O E d SCHEDULE D1 ° L N CL San Bernardino Valley Expenditure Plan Freeway Projects Detail c Freeway Projects Amount 3 1-10 Widening from 1-15 to Riverside County Line $ 610 Million 1-15 Widening from Riverside Count Line to 1-215 0 g y $ 180 Million M 1-215 Widening from Riverside County Line to 1-10 $ 300 Million 1-215 Widening from SR-301210 to 1-15 $ 120 Million Z SR-30/210 Widening from 1-215 to I-10 $ 140 Million m Carpool Lane Connectors $ 90 Million E Total Freeway Projects Cost $ 1,440 Million Freeway Projects Measure "I" Revenue $ 1,311 Million a State and Federal Revenues $ 129 Million c Total Freeway Projects Revenues $ 1,440 Million d E r it a M10rdinance-kal Page 13 6.E.p ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE D2 San Bernardino Valley Expenditure Plan Freeway Interchange Projects Detail Freeway Interchange Projects Amount o Improvements including but not limited to: 1-10 Interchanges at Monte Vista, Grove/Fourth St, Vineyard, Cherry, z Citrus, Cedar, Riverside, Mt. Vernon, Tippecanoe, Mountain View, California, Alabama, Wabash, Live Oak Canyon, Wildwood Canyon E 1-15 Interchanges at 6rh St/Arrow, Baseline, Duncan Canyon, Sierra c v SR-60 Interchanges at Ramona, Central, Mountain, Grove, Vineyard C 1-215 Interchanges at University Parkway and Palm a 0 SR-301210 Interchanges at Waterman, Del Rosa, Highland, 5rh St, and Baseline c d Freeway Interchange Projects Measure "I" Revenue $497 Million E CL State and Federal Revenues $ 32 Million 0 d Contribution from New Development $ 333 Million d Total Interchange Projects Revenues $ 862 Million v 0 0 .y d SCHEDULE D3 W 0 San Bernardino Valley Expenditure Plan Major Street Projects Detail m 0 Major Street Projects Amount r N Improvements to major streets that connect communities, serve major m destinations, and provide freeway access, such as but not limited to: in Edison, Pine, Central, Mountain, Grove Foothill/Fifth, Baseline, Valley, Slover, Jurupa 3 Tippecanoe, Anderson, University, Palm Lugonia, Barton, improvements to relieve traffic on Yucaipa Blvd Railroad Crossing Improvements, such as but not limited to Milliken and Hunts Ln Major Street Projects Measure "I" Revenue $ 814 Million Z State and Federal Revenues $ 82 Million d Contribution from New Development $ 444 Million E Total Major Street Projects Revenues $ 1,340 Million Q c d E r u m Q MIOrdinance-kal Page 14 t .^479 . m ATTACHMENT4 SCHEDULE D4 San Bernardino Valley Expenditure Plan Local Street Projects Detail o N r Local Street Projects Amount d Distribution to cities and County for street repair and improvements Z Local Street Projects Measure "I" Revenue $ 904 Million E State and Federal Revenues $ 187 Million 0 Total Local Street Projects Revenues $ 1,091 Million v E ry '0 0 U C 0 SCHEDULE D5 0 0 0 San Bernardino Valley Expenditure Plan Metrolink/Rail Service Detail y 0 Metrolink/Rail Service Amount v Contributions to the following projects: Metrolink _ Redlands Extension Gold Line Extension o Metrolink/Rail Service Measure "I" Revenue $ 362 Million A State and Federal Revenues $ 330 Million Total Metrolink/Rail Service Revenues $ 692 Million o E m 0 t N Q C U) SCHEDULE D6 — d L San Bernardino Valley Expenditure Plan Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service Detail d Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service Amount Z Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service Measure "1" Revenue $ 180 Million State and Federal Revenues $ 121 Million d E Total Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit Service Revenues $ 301 Million R a V C d E r u m MlOrdinance-kal Page 15 ATTACHMENT 6. SCHEDULE E Victor Valley Subarea Expenditure Plan 0 Cq Project Category Measure "I" Amount I Percentage 0 Local Street Projects 70% $ 596 Million z C Major Local Highway Projects 25% $213 Million E Senior and Disabled Transit Service 5% $ 43 Million Total Victor Valle Subarea Measure "I" Revenue 100% E Valley $852 Million Q m 0 0 U Y Victor Valley Expenditure Plan Detail d Local Street Projects a Distribution to cities and County for street repair and improvements 0 New construction to relieve Bear Valley Rd, Ranchero Rd, new d east/west roadways Local Street Projects Measure "I" Revenue $ 596 Million o State and Federal Revenues $ 39 Million an Contribution from New Development, Major Streets $ 281 Million Total Local Street Projects Revenues $ 916 Million c 0 Major Local Highway Projects w Contributions to Projects including but not limited to: New Interchanges at I-15 and Ranchero, Eucalyptus, LaMesa/Nisqualli High Desert Corridor 0 E 1-15 Widening through Victor Valley SR 438 Widening and Improvements US-395 Widening and Improvements 0 Major Local Highway Projects Measure "1" Revenue $ 213 Million a m State and Federal Revenues $ 112 Million c Contribution from New Development, Freeway Interchanges $ 88 Million Total Major Local Highway Projects Revenues $ 413 Million N Senior and Disabled Transit Service $ 43 Million z c m E r U w Q C d E L V N a MIOrdinance-kal Page 16 Packet Pg. 481 I ATTACHMENT SCHEDULEF North Desert Subarea Expenditure Plan 0 N Project Category Measure "I"Percentage Amount o z Local Street Projects 70% $ 66 Million c d Major Local Highway Projects 25% $ 24 Million E Senior and Disabled Transit Service 5% $ 5 Million m E Total North Desert Subarea Measure "I" Revenue 100% $95 Million Q d v 0 U c North Desert Expenditure Plan Detail m E Local Street Projects o Distribution to cities and County for street repair and improvements Improvements including but not limited to Lenwood Rd, Armory Rd, o Rimrock Rd and Main St Local Street Projects Measure "I" Revenue $ 66 Million State and Federal Revenues $ 2 Million Total Local Street Projects Revenues $ 68 Million Major Local Highway Projects $24 Million c Contributions to Projects including but not limited to: •N � SR-58 Widening and Improvements US-395 Widening and Improvements c Lenwood Rd and Vista Rd Grade Separations in Barstow E ai Senior and Disabled Transit Service $ 5 Million c s N M m c d N at z r C ai E L U A Q c a1 E L M a7 Q MlOrdinance-kal Page 17 ATTACHMENT CSCHEDULE G Mountains Subarea Expenditure Plan o Project Category Measure "I"Percentage Amount N Local Street Projects 70% $ 83 Million z Major Local Highway Projects 25% $ 30 Million Senior and Disabled Transit Service 5% $ 6 Million E c Total Mountains Subarea Measure "I" Revenue 100% $119 Million E E v 0 0 Mountains Expenditure Plan Detail v c Local Street Projects W E Distribution to cities and County for street repair and improvements 0- 0 Local Street Projects Measure "I" Revenue $ 83 Million m State and Federal Revenues $ 5 Million 0 Total Local Street Projects Revenues $ 88 Million ID v Major Local Highway Projects $ 30 Million Contributions to Projects including but not limited to: SR-18 & SR-38 Safety and Traffic Flow Improvements SR-330 Safety and Traffic Flow Improvements 0 SR-138 Safety and Intersection Improvements T SR-18 Safety and Intersection Improvements Realignment and Rehabilitation of Daley Canyon Rd and Kuffel Canyon Rd 0 E Senior and Disabled Transit Service (5%) $ 6 Million v 0 r N d A C V1 d N t6 d M Z c d E r v R x C d E L V R Y Q M10rdinance-kal Page 18 Packet Pg.4 33 6.E.p ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE H Morongo Basin Subarea Expenditure Plan Measure "I" o Amount Project Category Percentage N Local Street Projects 70% $ 88 Million z Major Local Highway Projects 25% $ 31 Million Senior and Disabled Transit Service 5% $ 6 Million E c Total Morongo Basin Subarea Measure "I" Revenue 100% $ 125 Million E a d 0 0 U Morongo Basin Expenditure Plan Detail Local Street Projects E Distribution to cities and County for street repair and improvements 0. 0 Local Street Projects Measure "I" Revenue $ 88 Million State and Federal Revenues $ 5 Million m Total Local Street Projects Revenues $ 93 Million m v Major Local Highway Projects $ 31 Million O Contributions to Projects including but not limited to: SR-62 & SR-247 Widening and Safety Improvements SR-62 Widening and Safety Improvements between the Morongo 0 Basin and the Coachella Valley w v Senior and Disabled Transit Service $ 6 Million 0 E w 0 r N o. m c rn m 3 N N d Z C d E L U z a C 0 E L V CO a MlOrdinance-kal Page 19 Packet Pg. 484 6.E.p ATTACHMENT SCHEDULEI Colorado River Subarea Expenditure Plan Measure "I" o Project Category Percentage Amount N r Local Street Projects 70% $ 41 Million z Major Local Highway Projects 25% $ 15 Million Senior and Disabled Transit Service 5% $ 3 Million E C Total Colorado River Subarea Measure"I" Revenue 100% $ 59 Million E Q v 0 0 Colorado River Expenditure Plan Detail v c Local Street Projects E Distribution to cities and County for street repair and improvements 0. 0 Local Street Projects Measure "I" Revenue $ 41 Million m State and Federal Revenues $ 2 Million d Total Local Street Projects Revenues $ 43 Million m V Major Local Highway Projects $ 15 Million Ln Contributions to Projects including but not limited to: Needles Highway Widening and Realignment from 1-40 to the Nevada State Line o Reconstruction of J Street and Construction of new Bridge 4 in Needles connecting I-40 to Arizona Senior and Disabled Transit Service (5%) $ 3 Million E E 0 s O Q R C d 7 N R d Z C d E r U r r Q r C d E L V R Q MlOrdinance�kal Page 20 Packet Pg. 485 6.E.p ATTACHMENT4 FIGURE J Mountain/Desert Expenditure Plan 0 N Senior and Disabled Transit Service 5% 0 z Major Local Highway Projects 25% .... Local Street Projects 70% y ..:::............. C .:::::::............. E ........................ Q ......................... ............................ v ............................. O U C d 1 O d d O a N r C 0 N d O E d O t N O. C C N d 7 Vi W d z w C d E L U A x Q C d E L U m Q MlOrdinance-kal Page 21 6.E.p ATTACHMENT Exhibit B Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) T O ITOC Goal and Function. Voter approval of this Measure "I" shall result in creation of an N Independent Taxpayer and Oversight Committee (ITOC)as follows: c Z The ITOC shall provide citizen review to ensure that all Measure "I" funds are spent by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (hereby referred to as the Authority) in E accordance with provisions of the Expenditure Plan and Ordinance No. 04-01. c m E Audit Requirement. A bi-annual fiscal and compliance audit shall be performed in o accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. The audit shall review the basic financial statements of the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority as defined by the Governmental Accounting Standard Board and the financial and compliance audits of the E member jurisdictions. 0� d Role of Financial and Compliance Audit and the ITOC. The ITOC shall review the annual audits of the Authority; report findings based on the audits to the Authority; and recommend any additional audits for consideration which the ITOC believes may improve the v financial operation and integrity of program implementation. The Authority shall hold a publicly noticed meeting, which may or may not be included on the c agenda of a regularly scheduled Board meeting, with the participation of the ITOC to consider the w findings and recommendations of the audits. ,> Membership and Selection Process. The Authority shall have an open process to 0 select five committee members, which shall include solicitation of trade and other organizations to E suggest potential nominees to the committee. The committee members shall possess the following credentials: 0 s w CL • One member who is a professional in the field of municipal audit, finance and/or budgeting with a minimum of five years in a relevant and senior decision-making N position in the public or private sector. m • One member who is a licensed civil engineer or trained transportation planner with at least five years of demonstrated experience in the fields of transportation and/or 0 urban design in government and/or the private sector. No member shall be a recipient or sub- recipient of Measure"I"funding. z • One member who is a current or retired manager of a major publicly financed = development or construction project, who by training and experience would m understand the complexity, costs and implementation issues in building large scale E transportation improvements. • One member who is a current or retired manager of a major privately financed development or construction project, who by training and experience would understand the complexity, costs and implementation issues in building large scale transportation improvements. E t • One public member, who possesses the knowledge and skills which will be helpful to � the work of the ITOC. • The Chair and the Executive Director of the Authority shall serve as ex-officio members of the ITOC. MlOrdinwce-kal Page 22 Packet Pg.487 ATTACHMENT ® Terms and Conditions for Committees. Committee members shall serve staggered four-year terms. In no case shall any voting committee member serve more than eight years on the ITOC. • Committee members shall serve without compensation, except they shall be reimbursed for authorized travel and other expenses directly related to the work of o the ITOC. N • Committee members cannot be a current local elected official in the county or a full time staff member of any city, the county government, local transit operator, or state 6 transportation agency. • Non-voting ex-officio committee members shall serve only as long as they remain incumbents in their respective positions and shall be automatically replaced by their v successors in those positions. d • If and when vacancies on the ITOC occur on the part of voting committee members, E either due to expiration of term, death or resignation the nominating body for that v committee shall nominate an appropriate replacement within 90 days of the vacancy o to fill the remainder of the term. c v ITOC Operation Protocols. E C • L Given the thirty-year duration of the tax extension, the ITOC shall be appointed 180 days o after the effective date of the tax extension (April 1, 2010) and continue as long as > Measure "I" revenues are collected. o • Authority Board of Directors and staff shall fully cooperate with and provide necessary support to ensure the ITOC successfully carries out its duties and obligations. Conflict of Interest. ITOC voting members shall have no legal action pending against the O Authority or San Bernardino Associated Governments and are prohibited from acting in any commercial activity directly or indirectly involving the Authority or San Bernardino Associated .2 Governments, such as being a consultant during their tenure on the ITOC. ITOC voting members shall not have direct commercial interest or employment with any public or private entity, which receives the transportation tax funds authorized by the voters in this Ordinance. o E v 0 Exhibit C N o. r C Measure "I" Local Transportation Improvement Program To relieve traffic congestion, improve safety and match state/federal transportation funds for: d - Widening/improving 1-10, 1-15, 1-210, 1-215, SR-60, SR-62, SR-18, US-395; z - Improving freeway interchanges countywide; c m - Improving local streets and roads; E s - Expanding transit for seniors and disabled riders; and N - Expanding Metrolink commuter rail; a c m Shall San Bernardino County voters continue the existing half-cent transportation sales tax s (Ordinance 04-01)for thirty years and create an Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee to insure all voter mandates are met? Q MlOrdinwco-kal Page 23 Packet Pg.488 ATTACHMENT4 Eae E e c t w € x s o N o a e W o f d r y E O `E O.E frc Sc' Z �z E v c v E .o o ° 0 o E a I9 0 00 ° °® o 0 c e o ° o © LO 6 9 I9 C Q > ® o(3 0 1 > ~ I ° o ID z�i g 0 1 IB a e c 019 rn >o © © { o 0 c N g _ os d E L U A Q C d E L U R Q MlOrdinance-kal Page 24 6.E.p ATTACHMENTS San Bemardino Associated Governments JlPolicy 1 34700 1Adopted by the Board of Directors November 25, Revised New 1991 11/25/91 Responsibilities Neovision N Table of Contents z .Il AuthorRies l Responsibilities ilntent I Revision History I C E d E I. AUTHORITIES a N These guidelines are adopted by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority relating to 0 expenditures by local jurisdictions of revenues generated by the Measure I Retail Transactions U and Use Tax. San Bernardino Associated Governments(SANBAG)is the County Transportation j Authority. Responsibilities of the Authority are outlined in Revenue and Taxation Code Part 1.6, E Public Utilities Code Division 19, and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority °- Ordinances 89-1 and 90-1. m > d 11. RESPONSIBILITIES SANBAG has full administrative authority for the Valley Expenditure Program, specifically the Major Projects,Arterial, Commuter Rail, Elderly and Handicapped Transit, and Traffic Management Implementation and Environmental Enhancement Programs. The Valley Local Distribution Program, however, represents funds directly apportioned to Valley jurisdictions for local discretionary use. Determination of the projects to be funded by the Local Distribution o LV Program will be at the discretion of the city/county governing body as adopted in the Five-Year 2 Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan of each jurisdiction. Each local jurisdiction shall provide the Authority with a copy of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted annually. ° m Different provisions apply for the administration of the Mountain/Desert Expenditure Program. o Measure I revenues in the Mountain/Desert programs (local, arterial/regional, and elderly and s handicapped transit)are distributed directly to each local jurisdiction. Determination of the local a and arterial regional expenditures in each of the categories will be at the discretion of the c city/county governing body as adopted in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and the t) Twenty-Year Transportation Plan of each jurisdiction. Each local jurisdiction shall provide the v Authority with a copy of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty-Year y Transportation Plan adopted annually. The determination of elderly and handicapped transit shall d take into consideration the Measure I Elderly& Handicapped Guidelines and shall meet maintenance of effort requirements. Z c Since the Mountain/Desert Expenditure Plan calls for subarea determination of an arterial E network and a cooperative expenditure program for accomplishing improvements, there shall be r U an annual review of the adopted Arterial Program of each jurisdiction within the subarea by the ;? Subarea Committee.Authority staff should be involved for purposes of fund forecasting, coordination and record-keeping, however, neither Authority staff nor the SANBAG Board shall exercise an approval function. m E t Major state highway projects entail considerable complexity and agency interrelationships. Projects may be conceived and developed, usually by more than one local agency in coordination a with Caltrans and SANBAG. Because of the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) impacts and leveraging opportunities, full Authority/SANBAG involvement is needed on both �• Valley and Mountain/Desert state highway projects. In the Mountain/Desert, the Subarea Packet Pg. 490 6.E.p ATTACHMENT f Committee shall be the focal point for determination and arrangements pertaining to Measure I revenues dedicated to state highways, similar to the process for arterials. Authority/SANBAG staff and Caltrans should also be involved. An annual audit of local jurisdiction expenditures of Measure I funds shall be performed. The b audit will consist of an examination of expenditures after the fact. If an expenditure is for a legal purpose, valid, and supported by sufficient competent evidential matter, no exception will be deemed necessary. In addition, the converse is true, if an expenditure was outside the intent of z the ordinances and policies adopted by the Authority, an exception will be taken. m E The audit of local jurisdiction expenditures will be for all expenditures of Measure I revenues c controlled by the jurisdiction. This shall include: d E a Valley jurisdictions: - Local Distribution 0 -Arterial, major, or other projects for which the jurisdiction has been named "Lead Agency' � c m Mountain/Desert jurisdictions: a 0 W -Local Funds > - Regional/Arterial Funds - Elderly and Handicapped Transit Funds o -Any Measure I project for which the jurisdiction has been named "Lead Agency" Measure I contains a provision that government agencies shall maintain their existing commitment of local transportation related funds for transportation purposes.As documentation o of compliance with this provision, each local jurisdiction shall annually provide the Authority with a H copy of its Proposition 111 Maintenance of Effort report. III. INTENT E These guidelines describe allowable expenditures of Measure I funds relating to public streets and highways, public transit, and related public facilities. They are presented to assist local jurisdictions in making determinations as to eligibility, responsibilities, specific determinations, °c accounting requirements, records, and sources of technical assistance. The SANBAG staff is a available to provide additional assistance whenever possible. c U) m N IV. REVISION HISTORY Revision Revisions Adopted No. Z 0 1 Ado ted. 11/25/91 c d E U U R Q c N E U U t6 Q a� / 6E:p ATTACHMENT 5 home > about SANBAG > SANBAG Board SANBAG Board Who Governs SANBAG? 0 N I The mayors and city council members of the 224 cities and the five members of the Board of d Z Supervisors within San Bernardino County govern SANBAG, c d E The organization is unique among councils of governments and transportation commissions in m California and is viewed by many as the model for integrated planning. Local governments within a San Bernardino County find value in the monthly forum of city and county representatives who (D address issues of mutual concern with a unified voice, Member Jurisdictions and Board Members E CL 0 Z Look here to find information about the monthly meetings for the SANBAG Board of Directors. d Links to our jurisdictions' websites are available on our Member Agencies web page. °. a President Larry McCallon City of Highland L. Dennis Michael City of Rancho Cucamonga Vice President Janice Rutherford Pete Aguilar City of Redlands County of San Bernardino 0 Can Thomas City of Adelanto Ed Scott City of Rialto 0 Rick Roelle Town of Apple Valley Patrick Morris City of San Bernardino E Julie McIntyre City of Barstow Jim Harris City of Twentynine Palms a r Bill Jahn City of Big Bear Lake Ray Musser City of Upland a m c Dennis Yates City of Chino Ryan McEachron City of Victorville d Ed Graham City of Chino Hills Richard Riddell City of Yucaipa N m Sarah Zamora City of Colton George Huntington Town of Yucca Valley g Michael Tahan City of Fontana Gary Ovitt County of San Bernardino Z Z c Walt Stanckiewitz City of Grand Terrace Brad Mitzelfielt County of San Bernardino E r Mike Leonard City of Hesperia Neil Derry County of San Bernardino 0 Rhodes "Dusty" Rigsby City of Loma Linda Josie Gonzales County of San Bernardino m Paul Eaton City of Montclair Ray Wolfe SANBAG E 0 Edward Paget City of Needles Syed Raza Caltrans District 8 Ex-Officio Member =° a Alan Wapner City of Ontario Source: SANBAG Measure!Central webpage: htto://www.sanbaL.ca.gov/funding/mi.html 6.E.p ATTACHMENT 6 Measure 12010-2040 Strategic Plan Part 1 and Part 2 is available on line at the following link: C? N http://www.sanbag.ca.gov/fundini!/mi.htmt 0 z c m E a 0 d E Q d O O U Y C d E Q 0 v m 0 v C O .y d O E v 0 t N Q A C d 7 N A d Z Y C d E r U Q is C d E L U W Q ' ATTACHMENT'7 6.E.P t RESOLUTION NO. 901n_360 0 N 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE d 3 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2010-2015) FOR MEASURE Z "I" LOCAL EXPENDITURES. a -e s WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "I" E (hereinafter known as Measure I 1990-2010) in November 1989, authorizing San Bernardino a 6 Associated Governments (SANBAG), acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation c Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the 0 7 incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino beginning April 1, 8 1990 and ending March 31, 2010; and, o 2 9 WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "I" d (hereinafter known as Measure I 2010-2040) in November 2004, authorizing SANBAG, 10 acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one v 11 percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino beginning April 1, 2010 and ending March 31, 12 2040; and, 13 WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvements 14 and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance o Nos. 89-01 and 04-1 of the Authority; and, E d 15 WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the ordinance require each local jurisdiction r 16 receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Five-year Capital a 17 Improvement Program and a Twenty-Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction; and, — 18 WHEREAS, due to the expiration of the current Measure I 1990-2010 Program on o 19 March 31, 2010, SANBAG is requesting that each local jurisdiction submit a six-year plan to 2 20 include the final year of the Measure I 1990-2010 and the first five years of the Measure I Z 2010-2040; and, c 21 W E WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the ordinance also require that each local u 22 jurisdiction annually adopt and update its Capital Improvement Program. a 23 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE d 21 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 2s SECTION 1. The Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Measure "P' Local a © 26 Expenditures, referenced hereto in Exhibit "A" including the Expenditure Strategy as ' indicated in Exhibit "B", both incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth, are 27 adopted as the policy and program of the City of San Bernardino relating to construction of 28 1 Packet Pgm 494 6.E.p ATTACHMENT 2010-340 capital improvement projects, using Measure I Local Expenditures, except for the following o 2 projects which shall be voted upon by separate motion to become part of this Resolution as Exhibit"C": c 3 z c 1. SSO4-51 Hunts Lane at UPRR("Union Pacific Railroad") E 4 (Construct Grade Separation) d 5 E 2. SS10-01 I-215 Freeway Widening; Segments 1, 2, 3, 5, & 11 Q 6 (Inspection Cost) c U 7 3. SS 10-07 SBX-Rapid Bus Transit(Inspection Cost) v & E c d 9 m IO v 11 `. 12 c 0 N 13 > d K 14 O E 15 Y O 16 w o. 17 y 18 3 w 19 d 20 Z c zI E s 22 m 23 c m 24 E r U 25 r Q 26 27 28 2 6.E.p ATTACHMENT 2010-340 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE FIVE- o 2 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM(2010-2015) FOR MEASURE 411" LOCAL EXPENDITURES 6 3 z c d 4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution wfs duly adopted by the Mayor 0 5 and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a3regular meeting thereof, held on E the 4th day of October 2010,by the following vote, to wit: a d 6 O O U 7 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT d s E MARQUEZ X o 9 > DESJARDINS* X o 10 n BRINKER * X LO 12 SHORETT X c 0 N 13 KELLEY x d 14 X O JOHNSON E d 1s � b MC CAMMACK* X r N * Council Members Desjardins, Brinker and McCammack abstained on Exhibit C M 17 only. yr /�0 __ , in is City Jerk v ��C N 19 A The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this 4P day of Ge-'C 2 20 2010. z V 21 v E 22 `� u Patrt c J. Morris, a 23 of San Bernardino Approved as to Form: 24 E r 25 JAMES F. PENMAN, M City Attorney Q 26 27 By: 2s -3 Pack 406'. . ATTACHMENT a . 2!&340 # ! , ■ ■ # # ! § ■ 8 ■ § ■ » # § : ¥ # 2 : ■ ¥ r � ; ! � § m ; z 4 , § E \ 0 ( _ k ! - B z § _ LO ■ § � k \ - _ - � - \ $ � - E - ! ! \ ƒ - • z ( % / § | . / ! ! J 0 ) > > > _ _ � � { ! . - . . ? a ° jp} i 2010-, ��_T7 » . " # — K � ; k § ) \ � G & ` ■ C CL > ui k ) k E � . ■ ■ . . 2 2 ) - k � \ ; t � ; CD ! ] ! ! | f ] | © { a ■ � 2 ) > & � � , � . ATTACHMENT p2 201@,4 4 § § # § § * \ 2 § ! § ■ 2 & � � � | 2 , I k E \ G k C CL 0 ; Ln { § � ! § E - a | f { | - £ { \ \ } \ } \ \ � � ) ! z § | | | } ` | \ / ! . . ATTACHMENT s!o» § j , ! » E \ G § E § { > 0; a LO k c | | f ! i ■ ; / \ k � CL A § / D k ) ) ) ) ) ) \ ) tO / « } § | ; | | ■ | ! & 5 k � § } ! ! � t�§ ATTACHMENT . . alga« _ » s ; . ! ; . § § � • § } , ! ) E E G ! | CL § . 0 > 0 G to | _ - . % • | | ] _ ! ! { § • » � � ! ; § ! ! • ! ! • § ( k � $ / / E | | ■ k k k ° f « � 601 � . . . 310-32 ATTACHMEN e § 7 § § § § # # # 2 ■ / § / % | ! § { E E G | | 7 © § E § CL ) fi § IL § o z ( e � � ■ | ! � ; _ � . LLI | ; ■ \ \ f to ; / § ( z - ! | k � | ! ! ATTACHMENT? 2010-340 EXHIBIT°B" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM o EXPENDITURE STRATEGY 2010-2015 z° r The City of San Bernardino will continue to place emphasis on both its regional and sub- E regional arterial roadway system. At least fifty percent of our Measure I funds allocation will be earmarked for specific capital projects that are geared towards improving traffic E flow and motorist convenience. Failing pavement surfaces will be rehabilitated and traffic striping modified as needed to accommodate increased traffic demand; and o intersection capacity will be improved with new and modified traffic signals. u d In addition to the above capital projects program, San Bernardino will continue to o allocate up to fifty percent of our annual Measure I funds towards public works d maintenance activities. Maintenance work will continue to include the City's traffic o signal systems, sidewalk and curb repair, and pavement repair and overlay on the local street system. N O N d O E UI O L N Q @ C N N @ Z C d E L U @ Q C N L U @ Q Packet Pg. 503 6.E.p ' ATTACHMENT? 2010-340 EXHIBIT "C" 0 Five Year Capital Improvement Program (2010-2015) For Measure "P' Local N Expenditures d z r N E 1. Councilmember Brinker Abstention: E SSO4-51 Hunts Lane at UPRR ("Union Pacific Railroad") (Construct Grade Separation) 0 Y C 2. Councilmember Desjardins Abstention: £ CL 0 SS10-01 I-215 Freeway Widening; Segments 1, 2, 3, 5 & 11 (Inspection Cost) d 0 3. Councilmember McCammack Abstention: ID a SS 10-07 SBX-Rapid Bus Transit (Inspection Cost) - 0 O .N .j d O E d O L N o. m c tq m a, Vl t0 d z C d E r M m a Y C d E t M 10 w a ATTACHMENT.7 `- 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-16 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDERING THI 3 VACATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) GENERALLY LOCATEI q BETWEEN VACATED TURRILL AVENUE AND GARNER AVENUE, SOUTH Ol cV 4 VACATED MAGNOLIA AVENUE, AND RESERVING UTILITY EASEMENT4 d THEREIN. z Y 5 W 6 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 7 a SECTION 1. Proceeding under and in accordance with the "Public Streets, Highways. c 8 u and Service Easements Vacation Law", Division 9, Part 3 of the California Streets and Highwa} d 9 E CL 10 Code, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, having heard the d 11 evidence offered in relation to the proposed vacation of a Public Utility Easement (P.U.E.) °. �o a 12 generally located between vacated Turrill Avenue and Garner Avenue, south of vacated 13 Magnolia Avenue, described in Resolution of Intention No. 2010-391, hereby find from all of o 14 the evidence submitted that proper notice has been given and that such public utility easement 15 proposed to be vacated by this Resolution is unnecessary for present and prospective public E 16 17 utility easement purposes. 9 H a 18 SECTION 2. The Mayor and Common Council of said City do hereby vacate that N 19 Public Utility Easement (P.U.E.) generally located between vacated Turrill Avenue and Garner H 20 Avenue, south of vacated Magnolia Avenue,more fully described as follows: 2 21 A non-exclusive easement for public utilities and incidental purposes over those portions c 22 of the south 5 feet of Lots 1 to 7, and the north 5 feet of Lots 8 to 14, inclusive, of Block E 5, of Tract No. 2130 The St. Elmo Resurvey, as per map recorded in Book 31 of Maps, 23 Page 6,records of San Bernardino County, State of California. a 24 SECTION 3. Nothing in this Resolution shall in any way affect or disturb any other existing easements for public utility purposes belonging either to the City of San Bernardino or 2 26 a" 27 to any public utility that existed prior to these vacation proceedings; and there is hereby 28 specifically reserved for the City of San Bernardino, its successors, heirs and assigns, a 12/28/10 1 M 6.E.P ATTACHMENT? 2011-16 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN VACATED TURRILL AVENUE 2 AND GARNER AVENUE, SOUTH OF VACATED MAGNOLIA AVENUE, AND RESERVING UTILITI EASEMENTS THEREIN. 3 temporary easement for sanitary sewer and appurtenant facilities over the entire area proposed tc 4 Z 5 be vacated, including the right at any time, or from time to time, to construct, maintain, operate. m E 6 replace and renew said sewer or appurtenances and shall include the right of ingress and egresE c m E 7 thereto; and there is specifically reserved for Time Warner Cable, its successors, heirs and d 0 0 8 assigns, a temporary easement to construct, place, operate, inspect, maintain, repair and replace w c m 9 underground and overhead structures consisting of wires, cables and necessary fixtures and c 0 10 d appurtenances and said easement shall include rights of ingress and egress; and there is o 11 specifically reserved for Verizon, its successors, heirs and assigns, a temporary easement over N 12 13 the entire area proposed to be vacated to construct, place, operate, inspect, maintain, repair or c 0 14 replace underground and overhead structures consisting of wires, cables and necessary fixtures m 15 and appurtenances and said easement shall include rights of ingress and egress. The temporary o E m 16 easements set forth herein shall terminate upon relocation or abandonment of the affected 2 0 17 utilities. a 0 18 m SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed and authorized to file a certified copy of d 19 H 20 this Resolution with the San Bernardino County Recorder's office. d 21 z .. 95 22 E t 23 a 24 m E 25 t U m x 26 a 27 28 12/28/10 2 Packet Pg. 506 6.E.p 2011-16 ATTACHMENT.? 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PUBLI( UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN VACATED TURRH,L AVENUI 2 AND GARNER AVENUE, SOUTH OF VACATED MAGNOLIA AVENUE, AND RESERVING UTILIT) EASEMENTS THEREIN. 3 ° I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor an( 4 z0 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a joint regular meeting thereo Z 5 E 6 held on the 24th day of January 2011 by the following vote, t( c d E 7 a wit: � 0 8 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT c d 9 MARQUEZ x a 0 m 10 DESJARDINS x o 11 BRINKER X 12 SHORETT % 13 Lh 0 Lh 14 KELLEY x 15 JOHNSON _x E v 16 MCCAMMACK % 0 L 17 Q 18 19 City-Clerk N m d 20 T� The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of January 201L. z 21 22 U ,� Vvy0fCSIan J. MO ,Mayor a Bernardino 24 Approved as to form: E 25 W U �WQ N M �— Q SP.e;. ) Ca4%uf 28 Packet Pg. 507 l2/2S/t0 3 6.E.p 2011-297 ATTACHMENT? EXHIBIT"C" Five Year Capital Improvement Program(2011-2016) For Measure"P'Local o N Expenditures 6 z c d E 1. Councilmember Brinker Abstention: a C d E SSO4-051 Hunts Lane at UPRR ("Union Pacific Railroad") (Construct Grade a m Separation). 0 0 U C d E Q 0 m v 0 �c c c O .y d O E N O L N Q N C fA d L N W d z C W E t V m x Q c d E r u M Q Packet Pg. 508 ATTACHMENTS 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-216 2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 THROUGH 2015/2016 5 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. N 6 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE Z C 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: E E c 6 SECTION 1. The 2011/2012 through 2015/2016 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), £ 7 referenced hereto in Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth, o V 8 is adopted as the policy and program of the City of San Bernardino relating to construction of d E c 9 capital improvement projects, except for Streets and Street Lighting CIP Projects SS04-051, 3 d m 10 SS10-007 and SS11-003, and Parks & Recreation CIP Project PR04-020, which shall be voted °. v ]t � upon by separate motions to become part of this Resolution as Exhibit °B" and "C" and shall 12 include the authorization to appropriate funds as indicated in Exhibit"A." o 13 14 c E 15 0 r 16 CL m c 17 to m 18 w R m 19 Z 20 w E 21 v 22 Q c d 23 E L U W 24 Q 25 ATTACHMENTS 6.E.p 2011-216 1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 THROUGH 2015/2016 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. 0 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and joint o 4 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on the w 5 E Sthday of July 2011,by the following vote, to wit: d 6 E Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT d 7 0 MARQUEZ * X S m VACANT c 9 Z 10 BRINKER * X 11 SHORETT X 12 KELLEY X - c 0 13 JOHNSON X " v 14 MC CAMMACK ** X E Rachel Clark, City Clerk °c 16 a 17 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this �I-N day of July 2011. * Exhibit B - Council Member Marquez an B 'nker a 2 Ig ** Exhibit C - Council Member McCammac ta'ned w m 19 Frederic E. Shorret ayor Pro Tem City of San Bernardino Z Y 20 Approved as to form: E r 21 James F. Penman m City Attorney 22 c W 23 ' E By: 1 24 a 25 x PaiNretP ,� 6;E.p 2011-216 ATTACHMENT EXHIBIT "B" Capital Improvement Program 2011/2012—2015/2016 0 N O Z MAROUEZ: c SS 11-003: Medical Center Drive from 0 Street to 16`h Street—Mill& Overlay E PR04-020: Citywide Community Center Upgrades m E BRINKER: Q m SSO4-051: Hunts Lane Grade Separation e O U c m E CL 0 m m 0 m v N r c O N .j d O E d O L N G A C N N L N 10 d 2 c d E L v Q C d E L v m a Packet.Pg.`5fi1 6.E:p 2011-216 ATTACHMENT EXHIBIT "C" Capital Improvement Program 2011/2012—2015/2016 q N r O Z MCCAMMACK: SS 10-007: SBX Rapid Transit Corridor Project E v c w E Q w a 0 U Y c w E CL 0 m w Ln D a C O .N w O E w Y 0 L N O. R C N w O N 10 w Z Y w w E L V N Y Y Q C w E L w A Y Y Q ATTACHMENT 9 6.E.p RESOLUTION NO. 2011-297 1 2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT r 3 PROGRAM (2011-2016)FOR MEASURE "P' LOCAL EXPENDITURES. N 4 WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I 1990- Z C 5 2010 in November 1989, which was renewed as Measure 12010-2040 in November 2004, E r 6 d 7 authorizing the San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino QE m 8 County Transportation Authority ("Authority"), to impose a one-half of one percent retail 0 9 transaction and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the E CL 10 County of San Bernardino; and � m 11 °. WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement 12 N and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance 13 14 No. 89-1 of the Authority; and N 15 WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance require each local jurisdiction W 0 16 receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Capital Improvement E 17 Program adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction; and CL L N 18 16 WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local N 19 20 jurisdiction annually adopt and update its Capital Improvement Plan. y d 21 Z 22 E s 23 / 24 a 25 E 26 27 28 Packet Pg.513 ATTACHMENT 9 6.E.p 2011-297 1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 2 PROGRAM (2011-2016)FOR MEASURE "I"LOCAL EXPENDITURES. 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE N 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: c z 5 SECTION 1. The Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (2011-2016) for Measure 5 E 6 "1" Local Expenditures, referenced hereto in Exhibit "A" including the Expenditure Strategy c m E 7 a as indicated in Exhibit"B",both incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth, are � 0 g U adopted as the policy and program of the City of San Bernardino relating to construction of � v 9 capital improvement projects, using Measure I Local Expenditures, except for Streets and c 10 11 Street Lighting CIP Project SSO4-051, which shall be voted upon by separate motion to 0 12 become part of this Resolution as Exhibit"C". LO 13 0 14 ) 15 a E 16 17 N Q 18 19 3 N 20 21 z 22 23 Y W 24 25 /// E v 26 ll! a 27 HI 28 Packet Pg.574 ATTACHMENTS 1 6.E.P 2011-297 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1 SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 2 PROGRAM(2011-2016) FOR MEASURE "P' LOCAL EXPENDITURES. 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor N 4 and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a Regular meeting z 5 thereof,held on the 7th day of November , 2011,by the following vote,to wit: E M 6 W Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT E 7 a d 8 MARQUEZ X 0 c 9 JENKINS X E CL 0 10 BRINKER * X "> m 11 SHORETT x o v 12 LO KELLEY X 13 14 JOHNSON X o N N 15 MCCAMMACK x 0 16 E / 0 17 Rachel G. Clark, CMC, City Clerk w0 CL 18 `° The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this /D day of November ,2011. 19 20 r m 21 atri k J. Morris, or City of San Bernardino ? 22 0 23 Approved as to form: JAMES F. PENMAN, m 24 City Attorney a c 25 By: E 26 a 27 *Council Member Brinker abstained on Exhibit C only. 28 Pac" ,.Pg.515{' o juawdOIGAOa , s t mmOH] oweW joLlsdBuS I __w- N IuBwLl3Bl4v m400 m 8 \ k \ 2 ` - \ \ k k \ / I § & \ & k k ( k k \ \ �( \ b / LU § \ § $ ® Co § 7 ■ ƒ _ E \ | LLI \ \ \ j k 2 _ \ \ / \ } \ k ) �\ � !§ \\£ ' \ != k y k m ) ( \ \ k �; { \CC B 3 ! o t ƒ k ;)i # k \ § , k k 7 §!A !k w ) k A - a ■ + Cd . ¥ ! _ - - , « 7 d § c Cc ° § ) k k ( \ 2 L) k- � ® t® -)k 2! !% °} | l 2�k §k a° §!! `/ �J o( f2 T ) k S - . 0 §2 06 § } ! § ;6 k§ f§ = - « & C » ! � J e 2!a>a 7?/-ii- ® / !!«; I* � M ! , o � ;! Ea3 .n_ ! It f! ; k 2 ; ■ §. @ \- $© K §B 2 Q $ §■ ■ | � \ , opoo;uewdolanad : gqg;) [; uoisinaa] oweW ;oysdeug I ainseeW- N ;uawyae;;y :;uawyaeuy r a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 o ui o o ui o �n vi o 0 0 h b1 0 0 m d Y U m i a � W S U Q H ru s f7 7 m Q F Z W 0 C a 8 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c d m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m c E E w w E E E E E E E E E E E E > > t > > >> > �' > > > > > > > m m m m m m m m m m m m a m m m CL a a a a o a a a a a a m c rn m Z _Z b m m N b m m m m m m m m m m m m m K 0: K 0:. K 0: d' K d' K 0 K K ro y cla mom � T m to co a m > $ o ¢ U > c _ _ M N N m y y > m Q m a Q N v p W a L m Q m m ° Q > L o N E N ta m N ¢ u3i m Q v v W mE � E c bb S v m J N o ° m m ? N co rn y m W ._ yy m m N U co N O� Y V N J J d N K m O S LL U U O O UpQ 4 9 4 $ g $ 9 9 4 9 4 9 9 4 9 9 4 , r y�y yr y�y y�y�� yy q�q N °c V N N F F o N N H N N N N N N M N N pp E N m N C b O N opo,Aole_o , sQRm+aM] amjoLlsdo @I ai_m- N_m3ejjva_qoe m , � a ) e C5 C5 u 0. L) LU k \ z } B $ 0 _ § | | K § \ k ( / / o / / k k 0 Z ( ! E & , E ) E § m ) / » ! % t ! § 2 # % a _ , , . c ! ! � k p { \ ( ) p lu . \ k k § f § .2 / 0 0 c £ . 2 { # ) \ � ) $ \ § % ! | 9 \ K @ ■ \ ` K Ti & . , opo,AwAA sO wm¥Okll _mIoLlsde@I __w- mAm3BPV #_t43em an @ q a k \ \ } bc \ § IL ) \ § � e { § $ ! « > tu- ru ; § § 0 Lo La 0 } \ k ° | � ■ ! | ATTACHMENT 9 2011-297 EXHIBIT"B° © CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE STRATEGY N 2011-2016 6 z The City of San Bernardino will continue to place emphasis on both its regional and sub- regional arterial roadway system. At least fifty percent of our Measure I funds allocation E will be earmarked for specific capital projects that are geared towards improving traffic m flow and motorist convenience. Failing pavement surfaces will be rehabilitated and traffic striping modified as needed to accommodate increased traffic demand; and intersection capacity will be improved with new and modified traffic signals. 0 In addition to the above capital projects program, San Bernardino will continue to E allocate up to fifty percent of our annual Measure I funds towards public works c maintenance activities. Maintenance work will continue to include the City's traffic signal systems, sidewalk and curb repair, and pavement repair and overlay on the local o street system. 0 N N W O E N 2 O s N O. C N d L N A d z w C d E s v R Q c d E t v m Q Packet fg.520 ATTACHMENT 2011-297 EXHIBIT"C" Five Year Capital Improvement Program (2011-2016) For Measure"I" Local o N Expenditures 6 z c m E 1. Councilmember Brinker Abstention: ° c m SSO4-051 Hunts Lane at UPRR ("Union Pacific Railroad") (Construct Grade E d Separation). c U c v E a O m Q 0 �o a N r r C O N .' d O E d 2 O t N Q C d 7 N A d z c d E t Q m Q c m E t U Q facke e-521' ATTACHMEN oLetters and email received on June 18, 2012, Mayor and Common Council Meeting for public hearing item on TD Overlay Project (Case # DCA 12-01) N O Z C N E n c v E d 0 0 c m E a 0 d m 0 v © v a m U d E I11 N d d J O m E t U 10 Q C N E r U 10 Q Packet Pg. 522 I I ULI—the Urban Lan,l,,, ;;;6 E.q 2082 Business Center Drive orangecounty®ull.org 1025 Thomas Jefferson f Suite 28 92812 vnviw/ur.ngeowty.ull.org I Suite nD0 Wes[C.20007-5201 Orange County/Inland Ernplre June 18,2012 0 ���n The Honorable Patrick J. Morris U �� Office of the Mayor JUti 8 ?0 City of San Bernardino citYpF �? N 300 North"D"Street QpM p��OFV U1Np c San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001 EPgRT z /r MfN Nt Dear Mayor and Honorable Members of the City Council; 4) d We appreciate the opportunity to address you on the occasion of the public hearing of the Transit Oriented E Development(TOD)Overlay District Ordinance. W 0 U ULI-The Urban land Institute is an organization with a 76-year history,comprised of 38,000 land use planning c and real estate development professional members(Public and Private)in 90 countries whose mission is to E provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities. ULI o explores issues of urbanization,regeneration, land use,capital formation,and sustainable development as well ; as advancing land use policy and design practices that respect the uniqueness of both the built and natural o environments.The ULI is recognized as the world's most respected leader in focusing on these priorities and is widely quoted as a source of objective information on urban planning, growth and development. v To extend the outreach effort of assisting communities,public entities and nonprofit organizations in solving ; complex land use problems,difficult development projects and policies,the Institute formed the ULI Advisory Services Panel program in 1947. To date, over 450 Advisory Service Panels have been assembled in a continuing effort to find creative and practical solutions for such issues as downtown redevelopment, community revitalization,brownfield redevelopment, military base reuse,and more. In 2007,at the invitation E UJ of the City San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino,a five-day ULI Advisory Services Panel was *a formed to recommend key implementation strategies and policies with specific recommendations for the City 2 and the County to undertake that included land use changes,transportation improvements,community lifestyle v recommendations,urban design,increased commerce,and government action programs designed to bring 7i energy,vitality and economic growth back to San Bernardino's central business district. O c d A team of multi-disciplinary professionals,ULI members with expertise related to the issues the region is Ec facing,was assembled to provide recommendations on how to make the city vibrant,livable,attractive,clean, and safe with a sustainable mix of uses, anchored by city and county government facilities as well as key a transportation articulations,traversed by green space and streams,filled with retail,office and housing choices, arts and entertainment. E E r U The panel found that revitalization efforts in the past in San Bernardino have been too piecemeal to be a successful,despite many efforts. So, the panel recommended to overcome the challenges the City should use a comprehensive strategic plan and see the big picture to focus on making downtown a destination,building an urban village, creating a sense of place,capturing the market and forging partnerships. C Packet Pg.523 6.E.q The Honorable Patrick J.Morris June 18, 2012 'age 2 Taking a bold step to introduce a new ordinance that outlines land uses around transit stations with the goal of encouraging higher transit usage can be a future road map for a sustainable community. The principles of Compact Transit Districts,Connectivity in street patterns, Walkability,Placemaking in building architecture and street landscaping,and Diversity of housing types are all consistent with the vision of a more compact, pedestrian-oriented community,which were also outlined in the 2007 ULI Advisory Services Panel. o N r The recommendations that the panel provided just five years ago are still relevant today. As you go forward z° during the public hearing and consider implementing a new Transit District Overlay ordinance,we urge you to c consider the ULI's recommendations. Don't let the extent of research conducted in your community with various stakeholders sit on a shelf. The ULI commends the City Council and the Community Development staff for bringing this policy to this point. As you go forward,know that ULI stands ready to assist the City of E San Bernardino move forward in a manner that will help move the community forward to future success and Q growth. o U V C d Sincerely, E CL 0 d d so v LO m John Shumway d Panelist, 2007 ULI Advisory Services Panel for San Bernardino E W � s �3aftz-,- J Phyllis Alzamora o Executive Director d E Cc: Michael Ruane,Chairman,ULI Orange County/Inland Empire a N E r a Packet Pg:`524- 6.E.q June 1, 2012 GLEN$OROUGH Honorable Mayor&Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 N. D Street San Bernardino,CA 92418 0 N Honorable Mayor&Common Council, z° On behalf of Tri City Corporate Center we are supporting the proposed Transit District Overlay E Ordinance. This type of advanced planning will set the stage for high quality development to v c occur in the areas around proposed transit station locations. The City of San Bernardino is E taking a positive step forward in developing the District and the tenants at Tri City Corporate Center stand to benefit from its adoption. By reducing the parking requirements in the station 0 location areas, we will be able to better serve the needs of tenants without having to provide c additional parking spaces. The ability to reduce the parking requirements due to the immediate E proximity of transit is something that more cities should be doing, as parking is a significant o consideration and cost of development. v 0 Another element of the TD Overlay that we are supportive of is the new development standards that call for high quality products and landscape screening. We believe that the functionality of _Ln the building and convenient access to lobbies, requires parking to be located on all sides. This v can be accomplished with the use of landscape materials that screen the majority of the surface > parking area from street traffic,thereby highlighting the building exterior design and finishes. It is important that the City receive input from property owners as project design guidelines are developed so that the needs of all parties are addressed. Furthermore, the City needs a new economic development strategy supportive of infill development that is not dependent on 06 constant expansion; San Bernardino is a largely built out city and for the City's population and tax base to increase over the next 10-20 years, a plan like the Transit District Overlay is an excellent solution. J 0 We encourage the Mayor & the City Council to support the Transit District Overlay and look d forward to a continued positive working relationship with the City of San Bernardino. E U f0 Sincerely, a Glenborough,LLC Bette). ader,RP iC �G� JUN, g a,CIT y General Manage Cot'l"'T ypaERNgR"INo PkNt Tri-City Corporate Centre nEP rMENr 6S0 East Hospitality Lane,Suite 150•San Bernardino,California 92408•909.351.5301 •fax 909.885.71V www.glenborougli.com Packet Pg. 525 6.E.q Sabdi Sanchez Acyndc� 'rlen-1 Lob rom: John Heimann <john @biabuild.com> Sent: Monday,June 18, 2012 2:14 PM To: Sabdi Sanchez Subject: BIA Baldy View Chapter-TOD Comments Please insert submit this letter into the record for the City Council's review for a meeting they will have at 3:00pm today o regarding the issue of the Transit Overlay District. 6 Thank you Z C d -John v d John Heimann a Director of Government Affairs o BIA— Baldly View Chapter v 8711 Monroe Court, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 E CL 909-942-2072 0 www.biabuild.com > d O From: Carlos Rodriguez Sent: Monday,June 18, 2012 2:05 PM ro: Casey Dailey(Dailey_Ca @sbcity.org) v Cc: John Heimann d Subject: BIA Baldy View Chapter -TOD Comments m Hello Casey, — E Thanks again for speaking with us last Friday about San Bernardino's new Transit Overlay District. w N Per our discussion,the BIA Baldy View Chapter respectfully submits the following recommendations about the TOD r development standards for consideration of Mayor Morris and the City Council including: _J 0 • Ground floor building facade facing a street frontage shall consist of a certain percentage of transparent building c materials—excluding residential (page 20) E • Minimum First Floor ceiling height changed from 15' to 12' (page 20) • 8' stepback applicable to 4"floor of development, not on 2nd floor as noted in development code(page 22) 4 We also would like to offer some additional observations for consideration: d E s v From a broader perspective, it seems that there is a lack of specificity when it comes to addressing issues such as :°. density,floor-to-area ratios, specific changes in future land use designations,etc. This lack of specific development a criteria infers that the applicant should either refer to the City's existing development standards OR should be negotiated with the City at the conceptual phase of the project. From our conversation it appears that the latter is the City's intent; in promoting a specific idea versus listing specific development and design standards which are,for the most part, absent in the document provided.The BIA Baldy View Chapter would like to stress another point made in our conversation: a City initiated hands-on cooperative effort with financial incentives to attract and accommodate interested developers and applicants to help your TOD become a reality. t Packet Pg. 526 6.E.q The City of San Bernardino has averaged approximately 85 residential permits annually issued between 2008-2011. This is obviously a small fraction of the permit activity of just a few years earlier. Please note,that many developers right -)ware highly skeptical of venturing into new projects for a variety of reasons all due to our current economic .ownturn. In lieu of this, BIA would highly encourage the City to examine the possibility of providing multiple avenues of financial incentives for future development and to assist applicants with their projects to become more financially realistic. Specifically, we would highly encourage The City to continue to offer various fee decreases,waivers, deferments and fast tracking the entitlement process within your various Transit Districts to encourage growth and eventually Increase a greater and broader scope of economic activity for each of those districts and their respective surrounding areas. T O N The BIA Baldy View Chapter appreciates the opportunity to discuss workable solutions with the City of San Bernardino. If c you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at 909-945-1884. z c m Best Regards, E c d Carlos Rodriguez E Chief Executive Officer m BIA Baldy View Chapter o 8711 Monroe Ct-Suite B U c Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 £ 909-641-4630 a www.biabuild.com d Lnd 0 �o v m > d v d .E E W N d d J 0 C d E U U Q C d E L U R Y Q 2 P:jcket"F�g'527., CALIFORNIA INFILL BUILDERS FEDERATION Honorable Mayor&Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 N.D Street :. San Bernardino,CA 92418 q N 1 June 1,2012 6 Z On behalf of the California Infrll Builders Federation, we enthusiastically endorse and support the v proposed Transit District Overlay Ordinance. This type of advance planning will set the stage for high E V quality development in the areas around proposed transit stations in San Bernardino. E The City is taking an extremely positive step in developing the TD Overlay. It will be a great inducement for infill builders to develop more walkable, sustainable, vibrant, transit-friendly projects in existing v neighborhoods. Also, by reducing the parking requirements in station areas, it allows money that would c have been wasted on under-utilized, expensive parking spaces to be redirected to investments in homes, E business and improved public realms—all elements of successful transit-oriented development. Reducing o parking requirements near transit is perhaps the single most helpful thing a city can do to encourage good TOD,and San Bernardino's leadership is something we hope other cities follow. o We also support the proposed new development standards that call for high quality product and increased V orientation of buildings to the street. Developers appreciate clear guidance from the City as to type, form and quality of building it wishes to see,and we take this guidance seriously. Furthermore, the City of San Bernardino, like so many cities in California, needs a new economic development strategy based on infrll instead of relying on constant outward expansion. San Bernardino is m largely built-out,and the TD Overlay provides an excellent means of growing the population and tax base a over the next 10-20 years without consuming additional land. W aS Finally, it is important to note that as the development community slowly recovers from the housing collapse of 2007, demand growth is strongest for multifamily units. A recent report from the California m Building Industry Association shows multifamily unit permits up 37% from January 2011 through J January 2012, while single-family permits have increased by only 3%. 1 strongly encourage the Mayor 0 and City Council to support the Transit District Overlay. The Infrll Builders Federation looks forward to m a continued positive working relationship with the City of San Bernardino. t V R Sincerely, Q c d E Me Kang,Board President I f o ll Calrnia Inf Builders Federa n O a 0USA I&,V �MONn'VOeFR O Mott Smith,Board Member � r California Infrll Builders Federation Packet Pg 528'' �.S Honorable Mayor&Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 N.D Street C ✓t'//4/ 1 San Bernardino, CA 92418 pYpF 8101? l y�pRp1N o June 18,2012 op MF/yr ( r/ �l.� z° V ® On behalf of National Community Renaissance,I am enthusiastically endorsinC, and supporting the proposed Transit District Overlay Ord4-._,6u. _r :c ,rte advanced planning will set the stage for h; lry development to occur in the a ",. areas around proposed transit .; Lion locations. The City of San Bernardino is o taking an extremel,- positive step forward in developing the District. By r " reduri_o ,11 king-requirementsisthe-statiort-location-areas,we- would-save--- -- tens of thousands of dollars that would otherwise go to provide for additional c parking. The ability to reduce the parking requirements due to the immediate proximity of transit is something that more cities should be doing, as the cost of o parking is one of the highest costs of development. �o a Another element of the TD Overlay that I am particularly supportive of is the new development standards that call for high quality products and an increased presence of the building footprints on the street. It is important that the City provide direction of the type, form and quality of development it wishes to see, 0: otherwise disjointed and non-complimentary development occurs. Furthermore, the City desperately needs a new economic development strategy supportive of W infill development that is not dependent on constant expansion; San Bernardino w is a largely built out city and for the City's population and tax base to increase over the next 10-20 years, a plan like the Transit District Overlay is an excellent solution. p c Finally, it is important to note that as the development community slowly E recovers from the housing collapse of 2007, multifamily units are the product that is being used to develop new housing. A recent report from the Califomia a Building Industry Association reports that multifamily unit permits are up 37% from January 2011 through January 2012, while single family permits have E increased by only 3%. I strongly encourage the Mayor & City Council to support the Transit District Overlay and look forward to a continued positive a working relationship with the City of San Bernardino. Sincerely, . ' . • • • • Steve PonTell, President/CEO 9068 Haven Avenue,Suite LOO,Renobo Cuoemonge,CA 91930 908.488.8444 Paz:909.489.2448 va/bnalc9ve.9eg •�" i A G er�ej� -�'�Pm �� Packet Pg.529 �r OMNITRANS r O N r June 26,2012 6 C m E a Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino E 300 North"D" Street to San Bernardino, California 92418 a U a C Re: Response to Questions dated June 20,2012 ru E CL The Honorable Mayor and Common Council: m m Thank you for contacting Omnitrans regarding questions concerning Omnitrans' bus rapid transit project, the sbX. Contained herein are the responses to the questions provided: N We've heard the project no longer has sufficient funding to be completed. The issue is that because N Redevelopment Agency no longer exists for both Loma Linda and the City of San Bernardino that S C6 there is a short fall. C' to I The Omnitrans sbX project is fullyfunded. No EDA or City funds were used. The San m Bernardino EDA provided office space, space for field offices during construction, and parking spaces for a future Park-N-Ride in the parking structure as an in kind(non-cash) � contribution. The cities of San Bernardino and Loma Linda have agreed to waive permit fees and the like as in kind contributions. z m J Is there any possibility that the sbX line will not be completed or operational by 2014? cl m L The Omnitrans sbX project is currently on target to begin operations in early 2014. ~ .E E It is stated it can be stopped,is this true? al The Omnitrans sbX project is fully funded and approved by all project partners. E • Omnitrans t • SANBAG • City of Loma Linda • City of San Bernardino c d • Federal Transit Administration E r v The United States Congress approved the Project Construction Grant Agreement for the Omnilrans x sbX E Street Corridor in September 2011. a Omntrans • 1700 West Fifth Street - Son Bernardino, CA 92411 Phone: 909-379-7100 • Web site: www.omnitrans.org • Fax: 909-889-5779 Serving the communities of Chino, Chino Hills, Colton, County of San Bernardino, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Highland, Loma Linda, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Redtonds. Rialto, San Bernardino, Upland and Y 6.E.r Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino June 26,2012—Page 2 $3.5 million loss for the sbX Omnitrans bus line per Department of Finance Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules(BOPS). Is Omnitrans now going to pay for City services for funds that are no long enforcement obligations of the City? There are no "losses"associated with the Omnitrans sbX project. It is fully funded and c continues to remain within the established and approved budget. N 6 What we've heard is that there is another loss between$8-$12 million dollars on the sbX project Z which may pertain to the estimated contributions made by Loma Linda and the City of San E Bernardino together. We are not sure from what this number relates to. Maybe,this number may a C mean something to you. E 4 There are no "losses"associated with the Omnitrans sbX project. It is fully funded and continues to remain within the established and approved budget. G U c We also need to know and understand what Omnitrans can or is doing to address any current m concerns communicated by the local businesses along the sbX route. While City staff is aware of c the street signage showing businesses are still open,what has Omnitrans done for businesses with d specific issues that have come up during construction to allow businesses to continue with daily c operations. Issues may relate to noise,street closures,temporary access restrictions and other items that the City may not be aware of. To your knowledge has any business closed or told you LO they would do so other than Pride Envelope? N The Omnitrans sbX project team has and will continue to communicate with both businesses and residents regarding project impacts. Ongoing efforts: monthly `" construction status meetings, monthly newsletter, weekly emails(construction alerts), v� social media(Facebook, Twitter, Flickr), door to door outreach(written and verbal notices of pending projects in targeted areas), 24-hour telephone helpline, bilingual information (printed, online and over the phone).Additionally meetings between individuals, organizations and the Construction Management Team occur frequently on an as needed basis. Presentations are provided at neighborhood meetings and with m various community-based organizations. i N C Other than Pride Envelope, no business on the corridor has communicated to Ommitrans F sbX they would need to close. c E Please provide a list of locations where Omnitrans is working with current business or property 0 owners and a list of complaints received. c m Omnitrans maintains a log of all business and property owner issues and complaints. The information is made available to project partners upon request. Latest copy x provided. Please note that any negotiations related to project property acquisitions 4 including temporary construction easements are not subject to public disclosure. m E r v m a 6.E.r Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino June 26,2012—Page 3 I trust this information addresses the questions raised;however,should there be additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 0 o Milo Victoria " 1 Z c CEO/General Manager m E v C MV/ww E Q Enclosure m a O U E d E IZ O 41 W D LO N n N r N co I V d O d fY d d J NI C A E- G E O a� c d E t U N Q Y C d E L U O Y Q 6.Es JUN 2 8 2012 June 25,2012 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO y DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Dear Mayor and Honorable Members of the City Council, We are writing this letter in support of the Transit District Overlay Proposal. T P Change is always difficult,but the overall plan will z° NORTNSIDEenhance the aesthetics of our community. VETERINARY CLINIC Sincerely, �aalrtw� Q•CQat�, �yr✓r d E BARBARA S.AUAflD,DVM Dr. Barbara Allard g UN S.VACCARELLO,DVM -IRET F.HORSTMEYER,DVM 4 o"�tjto t)vv�1 ° PATTY MET,DVM Dr. Lin Vaccarello d d 0 0 a CL rn C7 c d E s v m a d E r U A Q 309-883-0994 939 WEST 40TH STREET SAN BERNARDINO,CA 92407 y 7`J. � i 6.E.t ORDINANCE (ID#1546) DOC ID: 1546 AH i CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO—REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Municipal Code Municipal ode From: Margo Wheeler M/CC Meeting Date: 06/18/2012 Prepared by: Shirley Robinson, (909) 384 5057 0 N Dept: Community Development Ward(s): All o z Subject: . d An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino Amending San Bernardino Municipal Code E (Development Code) Chapter 19.02.060, Establishment of Land Use Zoning Districts to Add d Transit Overlay District (TD) and Adding Chapter 19.19A to Establish the Transit Overlay E District Pertaining to Development Standards and Design Guidelines. (FIRST READING) (At v the Meeting of February 6, 2012, Item Continued to March 5, 2012; Item Continued to May 7, 0 2012; Item Continued to June 18,2012.) N E Financial Impact: o None. > m <o oThe hearing was opened on February 6, 2012. Motion: Close the hearing; adopt the Addendum to the certified San Bernardino General °w Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR SCH#20041 1 1 1 32 (Attachment z J K); approve Development Code Amendment No. 12-01 based on the Findings of °w Fact contained in the staff report; and lay over Ordinance for final adoption I a: (Attachment J). N 0 N Synopsis of Previous Council Action: U On May 7, 2012, staff requested that this matter be continued to June 18, 2012, to allow additional time frame to complete tribal consultations pursuant to Senate Bill 18 -Tribal i Consultation Guidelines. As of May 17, 2012, all of the SB 18 requirements within the Tribal a Consultation Guidelines have been met. ineladine: The details of SB 18 are discussed in the It General Plan Amendment(Case#GPA 12-01) staff report. 90 day eensultatien peried eading an May 17, 2012 (one letter dated April 18, 242-, z San Miumel Band of Mission Indians); L — 45 day notiee of pr-ajeet eafament period ending on April 26, 204-2; and U t6 The Planni g Cef4ef: has reviewed the eeFfespOndeilee :e.e.e:.ea ffem the San Manuel Band .,f Mission Indians (Attaeliment M) and has detefmined that the FeEiiiest to add to Mifiga4i Page 1 PacketPg. 534 1/ Y. . . t. WIN NOW 1,1111 is I �. 1546 ? O Mayor and Common Council provided staff with comments and asked questions related to the Development Code Amendment. The Mayor and Common Council continued the Agenda Item to July 2, 2012. There were ten (10) proponents who gave public testimony and four (4) opponents (See Attachment M). The Mayor and Common Council also provided comments and concerns. In addition, four letters and one entails received on June 18, 2012, Mayor and Common Council o meeting are included in Attachment O of this staff report. N 6 z Proiect will bring low-income housing The proposed TD Overlay does not have any provisions to E mandate, require or facilitate new low-income housing. The c proposed TD Overlay does not allow any new residential, multi- 0 family residential or other residential uses where not currently E Q allowed. 0 Uses deemed nonconfomtm will they have to Existing uses deemed nonconforning may continue to do business w close business? with no date to be removed. If a business moves or vacates the m properly, a business owner has up to three (3)years (36 or more a calendar months) to re-establish a new business in the space one o used by a nonconforming use. The TD Overlay expands the °' number of permitted uses to allow more pedestrian oriented uses 0 such as: Convenience stores. Dry cleaners, Educational services. Mobile vendors, Neighborhood grocery stores, and Parking to structures. Concern about requiring existing shopping The proposed subsection (Section 19.19A.080 F.) has been w centers with parking out in the front to push the amended to replace the word "shall" with the word "should" to z parking in back of buildings. The police will not allow the option for parking to be designed at the front o p be able to see in the back of the building. In commercial properties. (Reference TD Draft Ordinance(Redline)— w addition, there was a concern with Stepback's Attachment All requirement. a 0 Staff is recommending that proposed subsection (Section N 19.19A.070 (Residential Transition Standards) has been amended w T to replace the word "shall" with the word "should" to allow the 1O option for a Stepback to be part of a building design. V 0 0 Other issues, separate from the proposed TD Overlay Ordinance, related to spending objections on spending City funds on sbX proiect, concerns with not addressiniz existing business issues during the construction of the sbX, existing bus ridership and use of Measure I and other funds. in In addition, concerns were raised about whether or not there were sufficient funds for the sbX proiect to be completed. Staff is following up with Omnitrans construction Planning Manager in E addressing the concerns related to noise, construction complaints and possible funding issues ssues raised during the hearing about sbX. During all of the neighborhood meetings held for the TD m Overlay, staff did make sure that renresentatives from Omnitrans were present to address a concerns voiced by those in attendance at the meeting Staff anticipates a letter from Omnitrms that will address the current funding status of the sbX project and a list of complaints filed with Omnitrans to date. On June 26, 2012 the Citv received Omnitrans response to the City's t concerns (see Attachment P). �r•' Page 3 Packet Pg. 536 1546 To address Measure I funds, staff prepared a memorandum pertaining to when the law was passed and extended, where in the law does it limit expenditures, which was established as the authority to make expenditures and what can be spent as allowed by the voters. Finally, the memorandum covers local authorities' roles with Measure I funds (Attachment N). 0 None. N- 6 Buckaround: Z m E a Development Code Amendment (DCA) No. 12-01 is a proposal to amend Chapter 19.02, Basic Provisions, to add Transit Overlay District (TD) and add Section 19.19A, Transit Overlay District to provide a regulatory framework for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) in the form v of development standards and design guidelines around future transit stops(Attachment A). r d Transit Overlay District (TD): The City has developed a set of zoning regulations surrounding a thirteen (13) future transit stations that fall within the designated overlay district. The regulations o are accompanied by a set of development standards and design guidelines that are flexible > d enough to allow property owners and developers to express their vision while maintaining a ° consistency in urban form to encourage an attractive multi-modal atmosphere. The TD zoning regulations would apply to the establishment of all new structures and uses within the boundaries of the 13 Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) station areas and future downtown multi-modal transit center. o w The City would maintain the existing land use and zoning designations of the affected parcels in o place under the proposed project.New development standards include but are not limited to: w • New build-to-line setback requirements to allow buildings to be placed closer to street c frontage with parking at the rear of the site along designated street areas; • Building heights are set differently within each proposed transit stop type with upper story L) step-back requirements and two story maximum building heights when adjacent to single- 2 family residential zone; o a v • Building ground floor transparency percentage requirements added by transit station area; w A • Building entrance orientation requirements set for building's main entrance to face Kendall Drive and E Street frontages; residential transition standards when projects are adjacent to E single-family residential are set to maximum of two stories or 30 feet; m • Reduced on-site parking requirements are provided to encourage the use of the adjacent a transit district facility; © • One bicycle parking space provided for every 10 automobile parking spaces provided; Page 4 1546 ( • Street block maximum lengths,with some minor exceptions, reduced to 400 feet; and v • General design guidelines with residential and commercial site planning, architectural design, parking design requirements, and street sidewalk landscape recommendations. An addition to Section 19.19A.040 General Provisions includes new subsection "D" Public Facilities. This section was added to address the unique use of parks, transit station and centers, o and other public facilities. In this section, The Planning Center mentions school districts which are already exempt from the City Development Code requirements by State Law. However, it is z6 mentioned as an example of unique public facility. A similar exemption within the Development Code relates to certain signs installed by recognized civic group, flags, ATM kiosk sign and E official & legal notices by a court or government agency. The specific language added to the TD Ordinance reads as follows: a "D. Public Facilities. Public facilities such as parks, public schools, and transit centers 0 and stations, and other public facilities due to their unique use and special function may deviate from the provisions of this chapter upon approval of a Design Review Development Permit." a 0 d The other revisions are minor in nature made by the City Attorney's office to clarify the d organization of the proposed "Design Guidelines," cleaning the language up with grammar edits °. or adding clarifying words, and adding the "Development Review Committee" as an approving to © body in addressing Interpretations in Section G19.19A.100 C. of the draft TD Overlay Ordinance. 0 w Z City of San Bernardino of San Bernardino Ayyrovals o w 12/05/05 Resolution No. 2005-412 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council adopting in concept the locally preferred alternative (LPA) for the E Street Transit o Corridor and Transit Supportive uses adjacent to the LPA Stations. 07/21/08 Resolution No. 2008-297 Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino approving and authorizing the City Manager of the City of 2 San Bernardino to execute a Memorandum of Understanding by and among the o City of San Bernardino City the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San d Bernardino Agency Omnitrans and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) State College Uptown Central City North Central City South Southeast Industrial Park and Tri City Redevelopment Project Areas c d 07/21/08 CDC 2008-27 Resolution of the Community Development Commission of the City r of San Bernardino approving and authorizing the Interim Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino Agency to execute a a Memorandum of Understanding by and among the City of San Bernardino City the Agency Omnitrans and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) State College Uptown Central City North Central City South Southeast Industrial OPark and Tri City Redevelopment Project Areas. Page 5 Packet Pg.538 1546 ® 3/16/09 Resolution No. 2009-60 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council authorized the submittal of Caltrans Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) grant application for the development of a TOD Overlay District. 09/21/09 Resolution No. 2009-326 was approved by Mayor and Common Council authorizing the City Manager to execute a Master Cooperative Agreement by and o among the City of San Bernardino, the Redevelopment Agency, and Omnitrans for the development of "E" Street Corridor sbX Bus Rapid Transit Project and d finalizing the station locations. Z m Approval includes: "Whereas, on September 21, the Mayor and Common Council as a Responsible Agency under CEQA, independently reviewed, analyzed and exercised E independent judgment in the consideration of the Mitigated Negative Declaration as a previously prepared and adopted by Omnitrans." c U 09/21/09 Resolution No. 2009-327 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council approving agreement for services with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. To E a provide on-call plan review services for the sbX "E" Street Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project -subject to an aggregate limit of $409,285.00 paid for by > Redevelopment Agency. ° a j 9/21/09 Resolution No. CDC/2009-55 was approved by the Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the Interim Executive o Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino to execute a W Z Master Cooperative Agreement by and among the City of San Bernardino, The Redevelopment Agency and Omnitrans for the development of the "E" Street °w Corridor sbX Bus Rapid Transit Project. N O 10/22/09 Resolution No. 2009-342 was approved by the Mayor and Common Council for co contract with Caltrans accepting funding ($250,000) for planning and implementation of transit-oriented development. v 08/05/10 Redevelopment Committee unanimously voted to recommend that the Community c Development Commission consider approval of Professional Services Agreement v by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino and The Planning Center for the preparation of a TOD Overlay District for the City of San Bernardino in the amount of $300,000 Caltrans Grant Tax Increment Fun f `" ( Funds o Redevelopment Agency, and in-kind match). E z 09/07/10 Resolution No. 2010-50 was approved by the Community Development Commission (CDC), authorizing the Interim Executive Director of the a Redevelopment Agency to execute a Professional Services Agreement between the Agency and The Planning Center to provide consultant services for the preparation of the TOD District for the City in the amount of$300,000. Page 6 Packet Pg.539 6.E.t 1546 ( Chronology of Citywide and Neighborhood Meetings for TD Overlay V 515111 Guests of Neighborhood Cluster Association Presidents Meeting -Planning Center, Arellano Associates and City Staff attended morning meeting; ASA Charter School - 3512 North E. Street, San Bernardino. 515111 Guests of Mt. Vernon Neighborhood Watch Meeting -Arellano Associates and City Staff attended evening meeting; Held at Robert Ballard Rehabilitation Hospital o Cafeteria -1760 W. 16' Street, San Bernardino; A total of approximately 12 community members were in attendanc. 6 z 6/15/11 Citywide Open House Meeting held by EDA; Cal-State San Bernardino-Obsershaw W r Dining Room; A total of 31 community members participated; Newspaper publications, local cable slates, Eblast,website, Public Service Announcements, and E Media Release. a d 0 6/16/11 Citywide Open House Meeting held by EDA; Redevelopment Agency Meeting Room -201 North E Street, San Bernardino; A total of 18 community members attended; Newspaper publications and local cable. E CL 0 m d 7/7/11 Guests of San Bernardino Arrowhead Rotary Club -Arellano Associates assisted ° Mayor's City Staff in Presentation; San Bernardino Public Golf Course in San v Q Bernardino- 1494 S Waterman Ave, San Bernardino. 0 9/29/11 Neighborhood Meeting held at Verdemont Community Center -3664 Little League Z Drive, San Bernardino; A total of 45 community members attended; Public notice 7 mailed to property owners and business owners. °w X 10/12/11 Guest at San Bernardino Sunset Rotary Club -City Planning Staff made a b presentation; A total of 35 Rotary members and guests present; Meeting held at Castaways Restaurant in San Bernardino -670 Kendall Dr San Bernardino. U 10/24/11 Neighborhood Meeting held at Shandin Hills Middle School -4301 Little Mountain Drive San Bernardino; A total of 27 community members attended; Public notice o mailed to property owners and business owners. o! w 11/3/11 Guest at Arrowhead Farms Neighborhood Association Meeting -City Planning Staff 2 made a presentation; A total of 9 people in attendance; Meeting held at Newmark Elementary School-4121 P Avenue, San Bernardino. v E S 11/09/11 Neighborhood Meeting held at San Bernardino Unified School District Community w Room -777 N. 'T' Street, San Bernardino; A total of 10 community members attended; Public notice mailed to property owners and business owners. O Page 7 Packet Pg. 540 1546 11/17/11 Neighborhood Meeting held at City Hall Multi-Purpose Meeting Room in Basement -300 N. "D" Street, San Bernardino; A total of 12 community members attended; Public notice mailed to property owners and business owners 11/30/11 Subsequent meeting that was planned was cancelled. No notices had been mailed. 12/13,111 Subsequent meeting that.. .... ..t...med was ,.,.. gelled rr,. ..,..:,,e.. r,..a h-RA, .,ilea 01/04,112 Q.. Sequent fneeting •6... .. plap..ed iAxaq eelled NA HE)tiee.. 0 had been mailed. N 1 12/13/11 Subsequent meeting that was planned was cancelled. No Notices had been mailed. 6 01/04/12 Subsequent meeting that was planned was cancelled. No Notices had been mailed. Z c m 01/04/12 Neighborhood Meeting held with Community Builders Group -Meeting held at First Congregational United Church of Christ located at 3041_Sierra Way; a E Approximately 30 members of this group were in attendance. d 5/16/12 Guest at San Bernardino Soroptimist Club; City Planning Staff and Omnitrans representative made a presentation.; A total of 11 in attendance; Meeting held at I c d Norman Feldheym Public Library in the City of San Bernardino -555 W. 6t'Street, E °. San Bernardino. ° d d 5/24/12 Neighborhood Meeting to be held at San Bernardino High School Cafeteria 1850 N. E Street, San Bernardino; A total of 10 people (property owners) were in v © attendance; Meeting was held for Marshall/E Street & Highland/E Street Neighborhoods. o W Z J 6/7112 Neighborhood Meeting to be held at City Hall Council Chambers -300 N. D Street, LU San Bernardino; City Staff and Omnitrans Staff to be present; A total of 17 people (business owners and property owners) were in attendance; Meeting was held for o North Mall Way and E Street, & Hunts, Carnegie and Tippecanoe and Hospitality Neighborhoods. U Note: A total of 15 public outreach meetings were held reaching approximately 287 people, with g an average of 19.13 people per meeting It was noted that 16 meetings were held at the June 18, 0 2012 Mayor and Common Council meeting. This is a correction to that statistic as the number of d meetings excludes Planning Commission meeting held on February 22, 2012, which was noticed w in a 1/8 page ad published in the San Bernardino Sun February 11, 2012. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEOA) E r An Addendum with Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan to the R previously certified City of San Bernardino 2005 General Plan Update (SBGPU EIR) and a Associated Specific Plans Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2004111132, has been prepared. It serves as the environmental review for the proposed Transit Overlay District (TD) zoning designation and associated development standards and design guidelines for areas surrounding the City's transit stations (proposed project). The TD and its regulations are Page 8 1546 proposed in order to implement the City's General Plan policies promoting transit-oriented development. This draft Addendum with Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan is the result of an evaluation of the proposed project in relation to the previously prepared and certified EIR. The evaluation, contained in the addendum, determined that the proposed project does not contain changes and/or additional details that warrant a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR as o described in Sections 15162 and 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines. Upon completion of the Addendum,the City of San Bernardino has determined on the basis of substantial evidence in the z6 light of the whole record that the proposed project does not trigger additional CEQA Review. In addition, the addition to Mitigation Measure 5.4-2, as requested by the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians letter Dated April 18, 2012, of the SBGPU Certified EIR has been determined to not be of significant impact draft Addendum analysis or previously prepared and certified EIR. £ (Attachment L and M). a 0 0 0 ANALYSIS U c 0 Public Outreach: There has been two public outreach efforts prior to drafting of the proposed TD a ordinance. The fast public outreach effort consisted of two community open house meetings held -0 0 on June 15 and 16, 2011. All of the transit district station areas were considered in these noticed d public meeting. The approach and summary findings are below: v Open House included three stations: 0 • The Community Meetings solicited public feedback by providing a looping PowerPoint z presentation for participants to view; o • Preference Survey of development types (density and commercial types) was LU administered; and X • Station Map Boards were provided to solicit input within the identified stations o throughout the 15.7 mile Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) route that extends between the City of o San Bernardino (13 Transit Stops) and Loma Linda(3 Stops). U U Final Report by Arellano and Associates concluded "as a whole the comments received during the community meetings indicate that the community has a deep desire to see the City improved o and enhanced. Respondents would like more amenities and enhancements and a higher and better mix of uses including a variety of neighborhood serving retail uses. Based on the results of the w Preference Survey, the respondents have a desire to see higher-density developments. A number =° U of well-informed meeting attendees did share their enthusiasm for the higher-density developments and related improvements associated with transit-oriented developments as a solution to improving the City of San Bernardino" The detailed final report is available online for review at the Community Development Department's TOD webpage: www.sbcitv.org <ho://www.sbcitv.org>. a The second approach comprised of neighborhood community meetings. The property owners and registered business owners within and adjacent to the preliminary transit district boundaries were notified of the meeting held at local community facilities or schools. In addition, local churches, Page 9 Packet Pg. 542 1546 © neighborhood watch groups, local Rotary Chapter, Indian Tribes, and Neighborhood Cluster Associations were notified of the meetings. ^ total of 91 R#e„aees showed up to one of the r.._ meetings ,,eheduled a,...., September to November 2011. Light roe ,.c the thii4eea (13) tr-ansit distFiet neigMefhoeds were widely a&eFtised to obtain input on most o the t}ffles-of tFansit-distriet stations. The neighborhood meetings were held for each of the proposed TD Overlay boundaries. The 13 TD Overlay areas include: 0 1. Palm Ave./Kendall Drive; N 2. University and Northpark; o 3. Kendall Drive and Little Mountain Drive; Z 4. Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills; m 5. E Street and Marshall Blvd. (Canceled and Rescheduled); 6. E Street and Highland Ave. (Canceled and Rescheduled); 7. E Street and Baseline; a 8. E Street and Court Lane; o 9. E Street and Rialto; 10. E Street and North Mall Way; m 11. Hunts Lane and Hospitality Lane (Canceled and Rescheduled); o 12. Carnegie Drive and Hospitality Lane(Canceled and Rescheduled); and _° m 13. Tippecanoe Ave. and Hospitality Lane(Canceled and Rescheduled) d On May 24 and June 7, 2012, staff rescheduled and held two neighborhood meetings_ wltieh v were eaneelled in Deeember 2011 and Januai=), 2012 "e to budget eeastmirAs. The meetings afe of this staff r-epet4. W Z J in saa ,-sStaff provided handouts clarifying location of proposed TD Overlay boundaries ui with a table explaining what is currently permitted and disallowed in commercial zones and what the proposed TD Overlay is proposing to permit and disallow at both meetings. The handouts b appeared to clarify concerns about permitted uses in their neighborhood. In addition, at both meetings the audience were able to ask questions about sbX project, presently under construction, from Omnitrans Transit Agency staff representatives. The planning handouts are U available online for review at the Community Development Department's TOD webpage: 2 Fyww sbeity ere http://www.ci.san- o bernardino.ca.us/citvhall/community development/planning/transit oriented development ( v tod .as >. w c d see nte n... t, � � detail E fnere Please..,. The comments received from the participants of the neighborhood meetings were considered in the drafting of the proposed Transit District (TD) Boundaries The proposed TD Boundaries a have been developed to address the many concerns received during the public outreach efforts This includes excluding any R-1 zone(Attachments E and G). Staff used a '/4 mile distance from © the bus rapid transit location in reducing the preliminary draft boundaries shown at the neighborhood meetings (September 29, 2011. October 24, 2011. 9 and 30 2011• May Page 10 Packet P„ 1546 Q24, 2012: and June 7, 2012). In addition, Tthe comments received from the participants of the neighborhood meetings were considered in the drafting of the proposed text amendment. The proposed development standards and design guidelines have been developed to address the many concerns received during the public outreach efforts. In addition, the proposed TD Overlay does include the changes outlined in the table within the "Background" section of this staff report. The amendments are included o in Section 19.19A.080 F (Parking) and Section 19.19A.040, Table 19A.01 (General Provisions) of the draft TD Overlay Code. Please reference Attachment 1 of Attachment J for changes to the d proposed TD Overlay Code. Z Please_ec..ne A w..,.6., ent u r ,.6... ges to is4i.....,..,:..g with TD Code y _______ ________________ ___ ___T_a__ __ _.______a___ __a ..___ __ ____. E a . ...,faro, Cofmaission ..,,frog januafy 18, 2011 Notiee of the .,41:.. 6,..,.ing of this item was v published in .. 1/9 page .,&eftisef.,e t in the San Bernardino Geunty Stet en T...,...,.._. 7 2012 Q O O U . .y., and vvuu .v. Couneil MepAng Febsaafy 6, 2012: Ne fiee o f the, , 61:e hearing of this iteFR r 0 was published page &e_ o. 201-2. Please re f rene° Aµ..,.6ment T O FINDINGS OF FACT > m 0 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan. oThe proposed Development Code Amendment would provide an update to the Development o Code to provide for future transit supportive land use throughout the City consistent with the w following General Plan goals and policies: zi 0 w Policy 2.4.6: "Work with Omnitrans to explore initiatives that promote redevelopment near transit stops in order to encourage transit ridership, reduce vehicular trips, improve air quality, b and improve traffic congestion." CO Goal 6.6: "Promote a network of multi-modal transportation facilities that are safe, efficient, U and connected to various points of the City and the region." g 0 0 Policy 6.6.1: "Support the efforts of regional, state and federal agencies to provide additional local and express bus service in the City." w w m Policy 6.6.2: "Create a partnership with Omnitrans to identify public transportation CIO, infrastructure needs that improve mobility. E s Policy 6.6.3: "In cooperation with Omnitrans, require new development to provide transit facilities, such as bus shelters and turnouts, as necessary and warranted by the scale of the a development." Policy 6.6.4: "Ensure accessibility to public transportation for seniors and persons with © disabilities. Page 11 Packet Pg. 544 1546 © Policy 6.6.5: "In cooperation with Omnitrans, explore methods to improve the use, speed, and efficiency for transit services." Policy 6.6.6: "Support and encourage the provision of a range of paratransit opportunities to complement bus and rail service for specialized transit needs." 0 Policy 6.6.10: "Consider the provision of incentives, such as reduced parking standards and density/intensity bonuses, to those projects near transit stops that include transit-friendly uses o such as child care, convenience retail and housing. Z c Policy 6.7.2: "Coordinate with SANBAG, SCAG, the County and other regional, state or federal agencies and the railroads regarding plans for the provision of passenger, commuter, and high-speed rail service. a d 0 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, 0 I convenience or welfare of the City. E CL The proposed amendment would assist in improving economic mobility from new transit service, —° m improve air quality by reducing automobile trips and their carbon emissions, increase housing d choices, assist in the affordability of housing, and provide walking and biking health benefits for ° residents throughout the City that will promote public health and safety. The proposed transit © overlay district would bring many benefits and convenient community life for residents and the City including and not limited to: o w Z Economic: ! • Increase property value-would revitalize the area within '/< mile of the station. LU N • Decrease infrastructure costs -would reduce infrastructure costs due to compact and infill o development that can use existing capacity and would not use as much capacity as auto based development. 16 U • Reduce household spending-would reduce auto, parking and travel costs Environmental: e 0 a Environmental: v • Improve air quality and energy consumption -would decrease auto trips lead to lower emissions. • Conservation of land and open space -would be compact developments and therefore, E consume less land than lower-intensity, auto-oriented development. u U • Decrease congestion-would decrease driving resulting in reduced congestion. Social: a Social: O • Increase housing and employment choices -would provide a diversity of housing and employment types in conveniently close proximity to the transit station. Page 12 Packet Pg 1546 © • Health benefits -would provide more opportunities for walking and bicycling. • Enhance sense of community-would bring more people and businesses closer in a pedestrian environment. Allowing the proposed amendment for Transit Overlay District will serve the public interest and o convenience, and would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare. 0 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: ? c Planning Commission Hearing January 18, 2012: Notice of the public hearing of this item was E published in a 1/8 page advertisement in the San Bernardino County Sun on January 7, 2012. Please reference Attachment IH. E Mayor and Common Council Hearing February_6. 2012: Notice of the public hearing of this item o wm publi5hed in a 118 page advertisement in the San Bernardino County Sun on January-25, 2012. Please reference Attachment 3I. E CL 0 0 CONCLUSION v 0 The purpose and the provisions of the proposed Development Code Amendment satisfy all ® Findings of Fact required for approval. 0 W z J RECOMMENDATION °w Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Common o N COUnCII: � 1) Adopt the Addendum to the certified San Bernardino General Plan Updated and Associated Specific Plans EIR SCH#2004111132 (A4taehmt); and r 0 2) Approve Development Code Amendment No. 12-01 based on the Findings of Fact d contained in the staff report and draft ordinance (Attachment J). w A City Attorney Review: U) c m Supporting Documents: E t Attachment A- TD Draft Ordinance_6-12-12 (PDF) A Attachment B -Resolution No. 2009-60 (PDF) Attachment C -Resolution No. 2009-342 (PDF) ^ Attachment D -Meeting Notes June 15 and 16,2011 (Reference) (PDF) (V Page 13 Packet Pg. 546 6.E.t 1546 QAttachment E- Meeting Notes- Sept 29 2011, Oct 24 2011 and Nov 09 2011 (Reference) (PDF) Attachment F-Transit Station Areas Chart (PDF) Attachment G-Addendum to Certified SBGPU EIR (PDF) Attachment H -Changes to Existing Zoning with TD Code (PDF) Attachment I-Notice of Public Hearing (PDF) o Attachment J -Notice of Public Hearing (PDF) 6 Attachment K-MCC Ordinance Draft_Updating Attachment 1 (DOC) z c Attachment K- Ordinance Draft (DOC) E a c Attachment 1 (Draft TD Overlay Ordinance) _Updated 6-5-12 (PDF) TOD Empeno email (PDF) E E Attachment L Comments Sari Manuel Band 04-18-12 (PDF) ¢ a Attachment M SB-18 Memo on Addendum to SBGPU EIR 060412 (PDF) c Attachment A_Draft TDCode (PDF) m E o. Exhibit A -Addendum to Certified SBGPU EIR (PDF) o d Attachment 1_Draft_TD Overlay Ordinance (DOC) o Exhibit A-2_SB-18 Memo on Addendum to GP EIR 06_04_12 (PDF) ® Attachment-A Draft TD Overlay 6-12-12 (PDF) w z J 0 W N O N W U U L 0 a v w m in c d E r v m Page 14 I