HomeMy WebLinkAbout32- Plannig and Building CITY OF SAN BERNAL_.LINO - REQUEST FOh.. COUNCIL ACTION
From: Al Boughey , Director Subject: General Plan Amendment No . 92-10
- To change the designation from IL and OIP
Dept: Planning & Building Svcs . to PCR, southwest corner of Waterman
Avenue and Dumas Street .
Date: March 30 , 1993
Mayor & Common Council meeting of 4 /19/93
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
None
Recommended motion:
Than the hearing be closed and the resolution be adopted which
adopts the Negative Declaration and approves General Plan Amendment
No . 92-10 .
Signatur
Al Boughe
Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 5357
Supporting data attached: Staff Report , Resolution Ward: 3
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
750262 Agenda Item No.
�c�
0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10 TO CHANGE IL AND OIP TO
PCR--MEETING OF APRIL 19, 1993
REQUEST AND LOCATION:
The proposed project is to amend the land use designation from IL,
Industrial Light, and OIP, Office Industrial Park, to PCR, Public
Commercial Recreation, on approximately 14 . 38 acres located
generally on the west side of Waterman Avenue approximately 475
feet south of Dumas Street with additional frontage on Dumas Street
at its intersection with Amos Avenue. The site is located north of
the San Bernardino Public Golf Course.
KEY POINTS•
The applicants initiated this proposal by requesting that
the IL and OIP designation be changed to PCR for their
site located generally southwest of the corner of
Waterman Avenue and Dumas Street. The site is vacant.
The applicants have indicated their desire to develop the
amendment site for recreational uses, possibly a tennis
club. However, no development plans were submitted.
When the applicants do submit plans, a Development Permit
will have to be filed as required by the proposed PCR
land use zoning district.
Surrounding land uses consist of scattered residential
uses and a church to the north; of residential uses,
vacant parcels and a golf driving range to the west; of
a public golf course to the south; and of a dairy and
building materials yard to the east across Waterman
Avenue.
Upon the adoption of the General Plan on June 2 , 1989,
most of the amendment site was designated IL, Industrial
Light, but with OIP, Office Industrial Park, on the
easterly 300 feet of the site along Waterman.
The main portion of the site is orientated to the east
towards Waterman Avenue while other industrial parcels in
the area are orientated to the north.
® 4
The purpose of the PCR, Public Commercial Recreation,
land use designation is to "provide for the continuation
of existing and development of new public and private
commercial recreation facilities in the City and ensure
their compatibility with adjacent uses.
The PCR designation will permit the development of the
site for public commercial recreation purposes consistent
with the existing public recreation facilities in the
immediate area including the public golf course and golf
driving range to the south and west.
The development standards of the proposed PCR land use
zoning district will insure the compatibility of any
future recreation development with adjacent industrially
designated properties.
Please see the analysis and attachments contained in Exhibit
Staff Report to the Planning Commission.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This General Plan amendment is subject to the provisions of CEQA.
The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) reviewed the
application on December 10, 1992 and determined that the proposed
application would not have an adverse impact on the environment and
a Negative Declaration was recommended. The public review period
for the Initial Study and the proposed Negative Declaration began
on December 17, 1992 and ended on January 6, 1993 . No comments on
the proposed Negative Declaration were received. On January 21,
1993, the Environmental Review Committee cleared the project onto
the Planning Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION•
The amendment request was considered by the Planning Commission at
a noticed public hearing on March 3 , 1993. The Planning Commission
voted 6-0 with 4 absences to recommend the adoption of the Negative
Declaration and the approval of General Plan amendment No. 92-10 to
change the land use designation from IL, Industrial Light, and OIP,
Office Industrial Park, to PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, on
the amendment site.
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. That the General Plan Amendment be approved to change the
General Plan Land Use Plan from IL, Industrial Light, and
OIP, Office Industrial Park, to PCR, Public Commercial
Recreation.
2 . That General Plan Amendment No. 92-10 be denied.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the
resolution, copy attached,which adopts the Negative Declaration and
approves General Plan Amendment No. 92-10.
Prepared by: John Lampe, Assistant Planner
For: Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services.
Exhibits: "A" = Location Map
"B" = Staff Report to Planning Commission
March 3, 1993
Attachment A - Findings of Fact
Attachment B - Initial Study
Attachment C - Amendment Area
Attachment D - Site Vicinity and Land Use
Designation Map
"C" = Resolution
Attachment A - Location Map
Attachment B - Legal Descriptions
nhnitll7 "A"
CITY JF SAN BERNriRDINO
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA 92-10
TITLE lACATION MAP
X 6 t
D - -
DUMAS ST
A
D
Z
S �
LEGEND
AREA OF
N
PROPOSED 'PCR"
EXHIBIT "B"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 2
SUMMARY HEARING DATE 3-3-93
WARD 3
APPLICANT:Ontario =Heights, CA, Inc.
W GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 711 Chur .
Q La Habra A 90631
U NO. 92-10 OWNER: Theodore et al
711 Chur .
La Habra A 90631
Amend the General Plan Land Use Map by changing the land
N use designation from IL, Industrial Light and DIP, Office
W Indutrial Park to PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, on a
14 .38 acre parcel located southwest of the intersection
W of Waterman Avenue and Dumas Street.
Q
Q
W
a
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION
Subject Vacant IL/OIP Industrial Light &
Office Industrial Park
North Scattered Residences IL Industrial Light
& Church
West Golf,Course & Golf Driving IL/ PCR Industrial Liqht &
Driving Range Pubblic Commercial Recr ion
East Dairy & Building Materials OIP Office Industrial Park
South Golf Course PCR Public Commercial Rec ion
GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC OXYES FLOOD HAZARD ❑ YES ❑ ZONE A SEWERS: IA7,YES
HAZARD ZONE: ❑ NO ZONE: DOJO ❑ ZONE B ❑ NO
HIGH FIRE ❑ YES AIRPORT NOISE XX YES REDEVELOPMENT }� YES
HAZARD ZONE: NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA:
❑ NO ❑ NO
J ❑ NOT Ig POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z EX APPROVAL
Q APPLICABLE EFFECTS WITH Q
h MITIGATING MEASURES
W 0) NO E.I.R. Q 1:1 CONDITIONS
M Z ❑ EXEMPT ❑ E.I.R.REQUIRED BUT NO W LL 0
Z ❑ DENIAL
Z C SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS Q W
Oz NTH MITIGATING H 2
a MEASURES N ❑ CONTINUANCE TO
Z ❑ NO SIGNIFICANT ❑ SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 0
W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. W
MINUTES 2
®114^M1O�' PLAKYm PILE t OF 1 N�1
i
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10
AGENDA ITEM 2
HEARING DATE: MARCH 2, 1993
PAGE: 1
REQUEST AND LOCATION:
The proposed project is to amend the City's General Plan Land Use
Map by changing the land use designation from IL, Industrial Light,
and OIP, Office Industrial Park, to PCR, Public Commercial
Recreation on 14 . 38 acres. The subject site is an irregularly
shaped parcel fronting on the west side of Waterman Avenue
approximately 475 feet south of Dumas Street and with additional
frontage on Dumas Street at its intersection with Amos Avenue. The
site is located north of the San Bernardino Public Golf Course (see
Attachment "D") .
The applicant would like to develop the site as a tennis club with
related facilities; however, no development plans have been
submitted at this time. When the applicant does submit plans, a
Development Permit will have to filed as required by the PCR,
Public Commercial Recreation, land use zoning district.
BITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS:
The irregularly shaped amendment site is comprised of two,
coterminous Assessor's Parcels. The southerly parcel, Parcel 141-
431-16, has a street frontage on Waterman Avenue, a Major Arterial ,
of 396 feet and a depth of 1, 320 feet and is 11.9 acres in size.
The northerly parcel, Parcel 141-431-03 , has a frontage of 235 feet
on Dumas Street, a local street, and a depth of 480 feet and is
2 .48 acres in size (see Attachment "C") . Both parcels are vacant
and are fairly level. Several mature trees exist on the larger
parcel. The amendment site appears to have been used for
agricultural purposes in the past.
Surrounding land uses consist of scattered residential uses and a
church to the north; of residential uses, vacant parcels and a golf
driving range to the west; of a public golf course to the south;
and of a dairy and building materials yard to the east across
Waterman Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
Upon the adoption of the General Plan on June 2 , 1989, the
amendment site was designated IL, Industrial Light, and OIP, Office
Industrial Park. Prior zoning on the site was "CM" and "M-1" .
i
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10
AGENDA ITEM 2
HEARING DATE: MARCH 2 , 1993
PAGE
DEVELOPMENT CODE:
Section 19 . 10. 010 (2) of the City's Development Code states that the
purpose of the PCR, Public/Commercial Recreation, land use zoning
district "is to provide for the continuation of existing and
development of new public and private commercial recreation
facilities which ensure their compatibility with adjacent land
uses. " It further stipulates that "sporting facilities" may be
permitted subject to the approval of a Development Permit.
Section 19. 10. 020 contains additional standards for development of
buildings and structures in the PCR land use zoning category. These
standards relate to the use, siting criteria, need, landscaping,
exterior lighting, visual impacts and compatibility of structures
and buildings.
CALIpORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOA) STATUS:
This General Plan Amendment is subject to the provisions of CEQA.
The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) reviewed the
application on December 10, 1993 and determined that the proposed
amendment would not have an adverse impact on the environment and
a Negative Declaration was recommended. The public review period
for the Initial Study and the proposed Negative Declaration began
on December 17 , 1992 and ended on January 6, 1993 . No comments on
the proposed Negative Declaration were received. On January 21,
1993 the Environmental Review Committee cleared the project onto
the Planning Commission.
ANALYSIS•
EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATION
Most of the amendment site is in the IL, Industrial Light, land use
designation; however, the easterly 300 feet of the site along
Waterman Avenue is in the OIP, Office Industrial Park.
The purpose of the IL, Industrial Light, is to "retain, enhance,
and intensify existing and provide for the new development of light
industrial uses along major vehicular, rail, and air transportation
routes serving the City of San Bernardino" (General Plan Objective
1. 32) .
s a�
V
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10
AGENDA ITEM 2
HEARING DATE: MARCH 2 , 1993
PAGE: 3
The purpose of the OIP, Office Industrial Park, is "to establish
the Waterman Avenue corridor and other appropriate areas as
distinctive office industrial parks and corporate centers serving
the San Bernardino community and region" (General Plan Objective
1.31) . The frontage along Waterman was designated OIP because
Waterman is a major entryway to the City and the intent was to
create an aesthetically pleasing corridor.
PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATION
The purpose of the PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, land use
designation is to "provide for the continuation of existing and
development of new public and private commercial recreation
facilities in the City and ensure their compatibility with adjacent
uses" (General Plan Objective 1. 35) .
The PCR designation will permit the development of the site for
public commercial recreation purposes consistent with the exiting
public recreation facilities in the immediate area. The
development of the portion of the site fronting on Dumas for public
commercial recreation purposes would be also consistent with the
existing development pattern in the area. There is a golf-driving
range located approximately 200 feet to the west which is located
off of Dumas Street.
Placing the PCR designation over the entire amendment area will
allow greater flexibility in the development of the site; will be
consistent with existing development in the area; and will allow
additional vehicular access to the site off of Dumas Street.
In addition, the development standards of the PCR, land use zoning
district cited above will insure the compatibility of any future
recreation development with adjacent industrially designated
properties.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Goal lA of the General Plan calls for, among other things,
providing for the continuation and development of sufficient land
uses to serve the recreation needs of existing residents and
population growth. Specifically, General Plan Policy 1. 1. 5 calls
for the continuation of existing public facilities in areas of the
City designated as "Public/ Commercial Recreation (PCR) " and
the establishment of standards and regulations for the development
of new facilities to provide for the needs of population growth.
The proposed PCR category will be consistent with the provisions of
the General Plan.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10
AGENDA ITEM 2
HEARING DATE: MARCH 2, 1993
PAGE: 4
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
Changing the land use designation of the amendment site to PCR will
allow for the development of public commercial recreation uses.
Properties to the north of the amendment site are designated IL,
Industrial Light, on the General Plan but are developed mainly with
scattered residential uses. Properties to the west and south are
developed with a golf course and driving range. Property to the
east is developed with a dairy and building materials yard. Any use
allowed in the PCR, land use zoning district will require the
filing of a Development Permit. The development standards of the
proposed PCR land use zoning district will insure that future
commercial development is compatible with the adjacent areas.
These standards will control the siting, need, appropriateness,
landscaping, exterior lighting, visual analysis, compatibility and
harmony of all future structures.
The amendment site is located along the westerly side of Waterman
Avenue, a Major Arterial , and along Dumas Street, a local street.
The proposed amendment to PCR has been reviewed by the City Traffic
Engineer who has stated that any mitigation measures required would
be developed through a traffic impact study which may be required
at the development permit stage.
CONCLUSION
The amendment site is bounded by public commercial recreation to
the south and west. The main portion of the site is orientated to
the east towards Waterman Avenue while industrial parcels in the
area are orientated to the north. Including the portion fronting
on Dumas will allow for the placement of the entire site in one
land use category and is compatible with existing land use pattern
in the area. The Development Standards will ensure the
compatibility of any future public commercial recreation with the
adjacent areas.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10
AGENDA ITEM 2
HEARING DATE: MARCH 2, 1993
PAGE: 5
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make a recommendation
to the Mayor and Common Council that:
1. A Negative Declaration be adopted in accordance with
Section 21080. 1 of CEQA.
2 . The General Plan Land Use Plan map be changed from IL,
Industrial Light, and OIP, Office Industrial Park, to
PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, for the amendment site
as shown on Attachment "C" .
Respectfully
submitted,
� , oeAoug h irctor
P nine anCd�B�ui�lding Services
� � Y
hn W. Lampe
Associate Planner
Attachments: "A" Findings of Fact
"B" Initial Study
"C" Amendment Area
"D" Site Vicinity and Land Use Designation Map
i V
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10
AGENDA ITEM Z
HEARING DATE: MARCH 2, 1993
PACE: 6
ATTACHMENT "A"
FINDINGS FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10
1. The proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from IL,
Industrial Light, and OIP, Office Industrial Park, to PCR,
Public Commercial Recreation, on the amendment site is
internally consistent with the General Plan.
2 . All elements of the map amendment proposal would not be
detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City of San Bernardino in that
the Initial Study does not identify any significant impacts.
3. The proposed map amendment will minimally affect the balance
of land uses within the City.
4 . The amendment site is physically suitable for the PCR, Public
Commercial Recreation, land use designation in that the
amendment site is sufficiently large to accommodate the
setbacks, screening, landscaping and off-street parking
required to protect adjacent residential and industrial uses
and has direct access to Waterman Avenue, a Major Arterial.
ATTACHMENT "B"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 92-10
Proiect Description: Amend the City's General Plan Land Use Map to
change the land use designation from IL, Industrial Light, and OIP,
Office Industrial Park to PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, land
use designation on 14 . 38 acres.
Project Location: The subject site is an irregularly shaped parcel
fronting on the west side of Waterman Avenue approximately 475 feet
south of Dumas Street and with additional frontage on Dumas Street
at its intersection with Amos Avenue. The site is located north of
the San Bernardino Public Golf Course.
Date: December 2, 1992
Applicant's Name and Address:
Ontario Investments, Inc.
711 Church Hill Rd..
La Habra Heights, CA. 90631
Property Owners' Name and Address:
Theodore C. C. King, et al
711 Church Hill Dr.
La Habra Heights, CA. 90631
Initial Study Prepared BY:
John W. Lampe
Associate Planner
City of San Bernardino
Planning and Building services Department
300 North "DIR Street
San Bernardino, California 92418
P�fl] PAGE 1 OF 1 µao�
4
Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report is provided by the City of San Bernardino as
an Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 92-10 .
Section 2 . 0 provides a description of the project and
site characteristics.
As stated in Section 15063 of the California
Environmental Quality Act guidelines, the purposes of an
Initial Study are to:
1. Provide the Lead Agency with information to use as
the basis for deciding whether to prepare an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or a Negative
Declaration;
2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a
project, mitigating adverse impact before an EIR is
prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify
for Negative Declaration;
3 . Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is
required, by:
(A) Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to
be significant,
(B) Identify the effects determined not to be
significant, and,
(C) Explaining the reasons for determining that
potentially significant effects would not be
significant;
4 . Facilitate environmental assessment early in the
design of a project;
5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the
finding in a Negative Declaration that a project
will not have a significant effect on the
environment;
6. Eliminate unnecessary EIRs;
7 . Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could
be used with the project.
Initial Study of General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
2.1 Project Description and Location
The proposed project is to amend the City's General Plan
Land Use Map to change the land use designation from IL,
Industrial Light, and OIP, Office Industrial Park, to
PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, land use designation
for a parcel of 14 . 38 acres. The amendment site is
comprised of Assessor's Parcel Nos. 141-431-16 and 141-
431-03 . The subject property is an irregularly shaped
parcel fronting on the west side of Waterman Avenue
approximately 475 feet south of Dumas Street and with
additional frontage on the south side of Dumas Street at
its intersection with Amos Avenue.
The PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, designation is
intended to provide for the continuation of existing and
development of new public and private commercial
recreational facilities and ensure their compatibility
with adjacent land uses.
The applicant initiated this proposal in order to
construct a tennis club including club house with
restaurant, athletic facilities and offices/shops. This
use is• permitted in the proposed PCR, Public Commercial
Recreation, with the approval of a Development Permit;
however, no development plans have been submitted at this
time with this proposal.
2.2 Amendment Site Characteristics
As noted above the amendment site fronts on the westerly
side of Waterman Avenue about 475 feet south of Dumas
Street with additional frontage on Dumas at Amos Avenue.
The irregularly shaped amendment site is comprised of
two, coterminous Assessor's Parcels. Parcel 141-431-16
has a street frontage on Waterman Avenue of 396 feet and
a depth of 1320 feet and is 11.9 acres in size. Parcel
141-431-03 has a frontage of 235 feet on Dumas Street and
a depth of 480 feet and is 2 . 48 acres. Both parcels are
vacant and are fairly level . Several mature trees exist
on the larger parcel . The amendment site appears to have
been used for agricultural purposes in the past.
Surrounding land uses consist of scattered residential
uses and a church to the north; of residential, vacant
parcels and golf driving range to the west; of a public
golf course to the south; and of a dairy and building
materials yard to the east.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND !]
Application Number: G P A 11 J��1�_�0 �ry J ( �,,, ,,/�
Project Description: At"QMOl I r"�t Lt-111 kS GenpV-4I t lavl Lc"d "' /t 'c��
tb c� e la,,d vk cipsi v afio>1 �iiaY>^ IL (mdvst1141 L:
�. O I P ( OFEirz l�cl�str�h� sl Imo) t� PC-9 ( PLbliL CoMnmv-i4
a,^ I ticve ,- 1
Location+ h ) 0.w.omclvn�t -';'.
� p t..v1n�.RYS ts�{" ' ' is� cJ�u`
it e�wvFnebg,v JM�.t H SaI�WGOp,jecq�
7S'soA'`A� "
t e7w;tX,
a- IJLv is �rt'°��AMos p4eAae
Environmental Constraints Areas:
General Plan Designation: blid t yi4/ Q 11,1 (10 -1-0 01�1'ce- 1,mda LL'c.1
Zoning Designation:
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain answers,where appropriate,on a separate attached sheet.
1. Earth Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe
a. Earth movement(cut and/or fill)of 10,000 cubic x
yards or more?
b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater
than 15%natural grade? X
c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special
Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic
&Seismic,Figure 47,of the City's General Plan? c
d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical x
feature?
e. Development within areas defined for high potential for
water or wind erosion as identified in Section 12.0-
Geologic&Seismic,Figure 53,of the City's General v
Plan?
I. Modification of a channel,creek or river?
> ��ww PLM-9M PAGE t OF_ (11-90)
g. Development within an area subject to landslides, Yes No Maybe
mudslides, liquefaction or other similar hazards as
identified in Section 12.0-Geologic&Seismic, ✓
Figures 48, 52 and 53 of the City's General Plan? ✓,
h. Other? N A
2. Air Resources: Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient x
air quality as defined by AOMD?
b. The creation of objectionable odors? x
c. Development within a high wind hazard area as identified
in Section 15.0-Wind&Fire, Figure 59,of the City's
General Plan?
3. Water Resources: Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff due to X
impermeable surfaces?
b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? X
c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration X
of surface water quality?
d. Change in the quantity of quality of ground water? X
e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards as
identified in the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map,Community Panel
Number 060281 (30-Lo _ A, and Section 16.0- X
Flooding, Figure 62,of the City's General Plan?
f. Other? N /A
4. Biological Resources: Could the proposal result in:
a. Development within the Biological Resources
Management Overlay,as identified in Section 10.0
- Natural Resources, Figure 41,of the City's x
General Plan?
b. Change in the number of any unique, rare or
endangered spades of plants or their habitat including X
stands of trees?
c. Change in the number of any unique, rare or
endangered species of animals or their habitat?
d. Removal of viable, mature trees?(6"or greater)
e. Other? fJ4A
5. Noise: Could the proposal result in:
a. Development of housing, health care facilities,schools,
libraries, religious facilities or other"noise"sensitive uses
in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an
Ldn of 65 dB(A)exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior
as identified in Section 14.0-Noise, Figures 57 and
58 of the City's General Plan?
" �"��•c[f PUN-Q.X PAUE20F_ n1-GJ)
b. Development of new or expansion of existing industrial, Yes No Maybe
commercial or other uses which generate noise levels on
areas containing housing, schools, health care facilities
or other sensitive uses above an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior
or an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior? X
c. Other? 1J /A
6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in:
a. A change in the land use as designated on the
General Plan?
b. Development within an Airport District as identified in the
Air Installation Compatible Use Zone(AICUZ) Report and ��//
the land Use Zoning District Map? /<
c. Development within Foothill Fire Zones A& B,or C as
identified on the Land Use Zoning District Map?
d. Other N /A
7. Man-Made Hazards: Will the project:
a. Use, store,transport or dispose of hazardous or
toxic materials(including but not limited to oil,
pesticides,chemicals or radiation)?
b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? _ X _
c. Expose people to the potential heatlh/safety hazards? Y
d. Other? L ! A
B. Housing: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing? X
b. Other N /A
9. Transportation/Circulation: Could the proposal, in
comparison with the Circulation Plan as identified in Section
6.0•Circulation of the City's General Plan, result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land
use designated on the General Plan?
b. Use of existing,or demand for new, parking
facil hies/structu res?
C. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? X
d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation?
a. Impact to rail or air traffic?
I. Increased safety hazards to vehicles,bicyclists or
pedestrians?
g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? X
In. Significant increase in traff ic volumes on the roadways L
or intersections?
I. Other ii,-)�A
PLM'906 PAGE 30F (11W)
10. Public Services: Will the proposal impact the following Yes No Maybe
beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service?
a. Fire protection? x
b. Police protection? X
c. Schools(i.e., attendance,boundaries, overload, etc.)? X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X
a. Medical aid?
f. Solid Waste? X
g. Other?
11. Utilities: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond the capability to
provide adequate levels of service or require the
construction of new facilities?
1. Natural gas? X
2. Electricity? Y_
3. Water? X
4. Sewer? X
s. Other? rJ /A
b. Result in a disjointed pattern of utility extensions? X
c. Require the construction of new facilities? X
12. Aesthetics:
a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any X
scenic view?
b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental
to the surrounding area?
c. Other? 1.1 / P,
13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site by development within an
archaeological sensitive area as identified in Section
3.0-Historical, Figure 8,of the City's General Plan?
b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site,structure
or object as listed in the City's Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey?
c. Other? N/A
�,� �y PLAN 906 PAGE A OF
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065)
The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or
maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact
Report shall be prepared.
Yes No Maybe
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history X
or prehistory? '
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term,to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals?(A short-term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,definitive period
of time while long-term impacts will endure well into 1(
the future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate resources where the
impact on each resource is relatively small, but where
the effect of the total of those impacts on the _ u
environment is significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental affects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.) I / -�—
St?a G"(f-aG�nf� c' tQe S
vann..r�x,.n a PL 4(X PAGESOF_ nt-W
Initial Study of General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
3. 1 Environmental Setting
The amendment site is located in an area subject to High
Liquefaction susceptibility and is also within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone established for the
Loma Linda Fault. There are no known biological
resources or concerns; however, there are several mature
trees on the site. The extreme northerly portion of the
site is in Airport District Two; the remainder is in
Airport District Five.
3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
3.2.1 Earth Resources
1.a.
The ultimate development of the amendment site area would
require movement of earth for the construction of
building pads, parking areas and sporting facilities
(tennis courts) . At this time, the proposed action
consists only of an amendment to the General Plan;
specific development plans are not available. However,
the amendment site is fairly level and it is unlikely
that future development would require earth movement of
10, 000 cubic yards or more.
1.b.
As noted above the amendment site is relatively flat and
no development or grading will take place on slopes
greater than 15%.
I.C.
Portions of the amendment site are situated within the
State of California's Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone
established for the active Loma Linda Fault. Development
of those portions on the site situated within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone shall be subject to
the findings and recommendations of a detailed geologic
investigation which will be required at the development
permit stage.
® a
Initial Study of General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
1.Q. through f.
The site area contains no unique geologic or physical
features. No "blue line" drainages are indicated within
the site area. It is not located within an area of high
potential for water or wind erosion as identified in
Figure 53 of the General Plan.
1.9.
The amendment site is located in an area denoted on
Figure 48 of the General Plan as being susceptible to
High Liquefaction susceptibility. A report addressing
the liquefaction issues will be required at the
development permit stage.
3.2.2 Air Resources
2.a. and b.
Air emissions and odors from future development in the
proposed PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, would tend to
be kept to a minimum because the maximum development
permitted within the proposed land use designation would
not qualify as a "regionally significant project" as
identified in the AQMD guidelines. Also, all future
emissions and odors would be controlled by appropriate
regulatory agencies.
2.c.
The study area is not located in a high wind hazard area
as identified by Figure 59 in the General Plan.
3.2.3 Water Resources
3.a.
Public commercial recreation uses of the amendment site
will require the construction of impermeable surfaces for
building sites, sports facilities, and asphalt parking
areas. As a result, absorption rates would be decreased
thereby increasing surface runoff. The Department of
Public Works will require that the conditions of approval
for any future development stipulate the conveyance of
drainage runoff to an approved public drainage facility.
This will insure that the potential impact is reduced to
a level of insignificance.
Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
3.b. and c.
As there are no water courses or bodies of water on or
near the amendment site, development of the site will not
change the course or flow of flood waters nor discharge
into surface waters.
3.d.
As noted above, public commercial recreation development
would cause the construction of impermeable surfaces such
as asphalt or concrete. Engine fluids, residue from
automobile tires, solid exhaust particulates and other
air emissions as well as chemical pollutants indigenous
to automobile usage tend to collect on impermeable
surfaces to be worked into the ground water as runoff.
If required, mitigation will be determined at the project
stage.
3.e.
The amendment site is not located within the 100 year
flood plain as identified on the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community
Panel Number 060281 0020-A, and in Section 16. 0 -
Flooding, Figure 62, of the City's General Plan.
3.2.4 Biological Resources
4.a. through c.
All natural vegetation that may have existed on the
amendment site was removed when development occurred
in the surrounding area or from agricultural usage. The
site is not located in the Biological Resource Management
Overlay and no unique, rare, or endangered plant or
animal species are known to exist on the site.
4.d.
There are several viable mature trees on the amendment
site. A report by a qualified arborist will be required
at the development permit stage.
Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
3.2 .5 Noise
5.a. and b.
The amendment site is located in a noise corridor wherein
noise levels are measured between 70 dB(A) and 75 dB(A)
(Figure 57 of the General Plan) . The amendment site lies
near the Norton Air Force Base. The future noise levels
on the site are expected to maintain a similar range
(Figure 58 of the General Plan) .
As indicated by the Land Use Compatibility for Community
Noise Environments Table on page 14-4 of the General
Plan, a maximum of 75 dB(A) is conditionally acceptable
for outdoor spectator sports only after a detailed
analysis of the noise insulation features are included in
the design. This analysis will be required at the
project development stage. In addition, the amendment
site lies partly in Airport District Five. This district
is designed to regulate land use in an area characterized
as having high noise levels. All new development located
in this district shall incorporate a noise level
reduction of 20 decibels.
3.2.6 Land Use
6.a.
The proposed amendment will change the General Plan
designation from IL, Industrial Light, and OIP, Office
Industrial Park, to PCR, Public Commercial Recreation.
6.b.
The northerly end of the amendment site is located within
Airport District Two (AD II) . This overlay district is
designed to regulate land use and reduce hazards in areas
characterized by high noise levels and a significant
accident potential resulting from aircraft operation.
Stadiums, sports arenas, and gymnasiums are prohibited.
Restaurants are also prohibited except for coffee shops
and fast food restaurants. The remainder of the
amendment site is located within Airport District Five
(AD V) . This district is designed to regulate land uses
in areas as having high noise levels.
0 O
Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
Before development can be approved by the City, an
"Airport Safety Review" must be approved by the Airport
Land Use Commission for San Bernardino County. This
review will insure that no aircraft safety hazards or
conflicts result from this proposal. This review will
take place at the development permit stage.
G.C.
The amendment site is not located within Foothill Fire
Zones A, B or C.
3.2.7 Man-Made Hazards
7.a. through c.
Recreational uses on the amendment site could result in
the storage and use of toxic materials. These toxic
materials could include a diversity of products such as
paints, dry cleaning solvents, detergents, engine fluids,
fertilizers and pesticides. However, the recreational
nature of future development would limit the intensity
and scale of any future use or storage of toxic
materials. Specific uses will be addressed at the
project development stage with mitigation measures
applied if necessary.
3.2.8 Housing
8.a.
No existing housing will be lost by a change in the land
use designation for the amendment site.
3.2.9 Transportation/Circulation
9.a. through b.
The proposed PCR, Public Recreation Commercial, provides
for the continuation and the development of new public
and private commercial recreation facilities which ensure
compatibility with adjacent land uses. Waterman Avenue
is a Major Arterial which handles about 26,500 vehicles
per day. Dumas Street is a local street.
The propose General Plan amendment has been reviewed by
the City Traffic Engineer. Any mitigation measures
required would be developed through a traffic impact
study which may be required at the development permit
stage.
® 0
Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
3.2.10 Public services
10.a through f.
The proposal to change the land use designation to PCR,
Public Commercial Recreation, will not impact public
services beyond their capability to provide adequate
levels of service. Future recreation development of the
site would be reviewed for impacts to public services at
the project specific stage. However, since the site is
located in an urbanized area, it is anticipated that
potential impacts upon public services would be
insignificant.
3.2.11 utilities
11.a through c.
The proposal is to change the land use designation and
will not impact utilities beyond the capability to
provide adequate levels of service, nor require the
construction of new facilities. Future recreational
development of the site would be reviewed for impacts
to public utilities at the project specific stage. It
is unknown at this time if future development of the site
will require the construction of new facilities, such as
water mains, sewer lines, or other utilities. Standard
requirements of the City would ensure that any impacts
upon public utilities are mitigated at the time of
development.
3.2.12 Aesthetics
12.a. and b.
The change of the land use designation to PCR, Public
Commercial Recreation, will not affect the aesthetics of
the area nor result in adverse visual impacts on the
surrounding area. The general development standards of
the proposed PCR land use zoning district require: (1)
that there be a visual analysis relating building
proportions, massing, height and setbacks to preserve and
enhance the scenic character of the area; (2) that
proposed uses be compatible and in harmony with
surrounding development and land use designation; (3)
that the proposed use be sited in a manner sensitive to
the existing natural resources and constraints of the
land; and (4) that the site be landscaped in a manner
which complements both the immediate setting and
surrounding areas.
C 4
Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 92-10
October 26, 1992
3.2. 13 Cultural Resources
The proposed General Plan Amendment would not result
in impacts upon cultural resources since the site
is not located in an area of known cultural resources,
nor contains structures or objects as listed in the
City's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey.
3.2.14 MANDATIORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (Section 15065)
14.a. througbt d.
The proposal will result in a General Plan Amendment from
IL, Industrial Light, and OIP, Office Industrial Park, to
PCR, Public Commercial Recreation. The response to the
checklist questions indicate that the project will not
result in any significant impacts. No cumulative impacts
resulting from the proposed project have been identified.
D. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial study,
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARA-
TION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,although there will not be a significant
effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
E] The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CRY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
Larry E . Reed , Assistant Director
Planning and Building Services
Name and Title
Signature
4/7
Date-Date: December 10 , 1992
PUN-Ytl6 Pr1GE_OF_ It t-0%
ATTACENENT "A[[
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM #
CASE 6PA 92-10
LOCATION HEARING DATE
vz
pw.wf Q .r
La
� �� �
IwOUwp3 W
O J
a
W.zi � V
Els ;
00.0 I y V
00..0. 100. 11. l
II .
0
i
z
e A j
..wr ... • .... •1 . O
C;MN49 W _
1
p�i� epa
� o+ PU 8.11 PR E 1 OF 1 (600)
A'lTAl:pAbp'1' °tl^
GSA 92 - IL
s y q
Lp
DUMAS ST
fR
D
Z
i
L E
G E N D
AREP OF
ATTACHMENT "C"
CITY , F SAN BERNPARDINO
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO .
TITLE AMENDMENT AREA
S T
2
DUMAS I $T
I A
D
Z
AREA OF
N
PROPOSED +PCR
"
ATTACHMENT "D"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM #
CASE GPA 92-10
LOCATION HEARINGDATE 3/2/93
..... H `
o HJo �
Vol
a
NO&W
..ovals I
cr
�J
Q
a.
M...t M L..
[."s I li
cx� i
o'
c
z '
i
M 1
...
of
op
�r cca'm
EXHIBIT C
G
1
RESOLUTION NO.
2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE
3 DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 92-10 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN
4 BERNARDINO.
5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
6
SECTION 1. Recitals
7
8 (a) The General Plan for the City of San Bernardino was
9 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-159 on
June 2 , 1989.
10 (b) General Plan Amendment No. 92-10 to the General Plan of
11 the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning
12 Commission on March 3 , 1993 after a noticed public hearing,9. and the
Planning Commission's recommendation of approval has been
14 considered by the Mayor and Common Council .
15 (c) An Initial Study was prepared on December 10, 1992 and
16 reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee and the Planning
17 Commission who both determined that General Plan Amendment No. 92-
18 10 would not have a significant effect on the environment and
19 therefore, recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted.
20 (d) The
proposed Negative Declaration received a 21 day
21
public review period from December 17, 1992 through January 6, 1993
22 and all comments relative thereto have been reviewed by the
23 Planning Commission and the Mayor and Common Council in compliance
24 with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and local
25 regulations.
26
27
28
0 0
1
2 e) The Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public
3 hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General Plan
4 Amendment No. 92-10 and the Planning Division Staff Report on April
19, 1993 .
5
6 (f) The adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 92-10 is
7 deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City and
8 is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
existing General Plan.
9
SECTION 2 . Negative Declaration
10
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor
1] and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan
12 of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect on
13
the environment, and the Negative Declaration heretofore prepared
14
by the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of this
15 proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted.
16 SECTION 3 . Findings
17 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the
18 City of San Bernardino that:
19 A. The proposed PCR, Public Commercial Recreation, land use
20 designation is internally consistent with the General Plan in
21 that such a designation is not in conflict with the goals,
22 objectives and policies of the General Plan, and will
23 facilitate the continued and orderly expansion of the area
24 pursuant to General Plan Objective 1. 35.
25
26
27
28
f
1 B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public
2 interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city
3 in that the Initial Study does not identify any significant
4 impacts.
5 C. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance
6 of land uses within the city in that the proposed amendment is
7 supported by the mix of uses in the area while a sufficient
8 amount of viable, industrial light and office industrial park
9 designated properties are available in surrounding areas.
10 D. The amendment area is physically suitable for the requested
11 land use designation and anticipated land use development in
12 that the amendment site is sufficiently large to accommodate
13 the setbacks, screening, landscaping and off-street parking
14 required to protect adjacent light industrial/office
151 industrial park uses and has access to Waterman Avenue, a
16 Major Arterial highway.
17 SECTION 4 . Amendment
18 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that:
19 A. The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San
20 Bernardino is amended by changing approximately 14. 38 acres
21 from IL, Industrial Light, and OIP, Office Industrial Park, to
22 PCR, Public Commercial Recreation. This amendment is
23 designated as General Plan Amendment No. 92-10 and its
24 location is outlined on the map entitled Attachment A, and is
25 more specifically described in the legal description entitled
26 Attachment B, copies of which are attached and incorporated
27 herein by reference.
28
o 0
1 B. General Plan Amendment No. 92-10 shall become effective
2 immediately upon adoption of this resolution.
3 SECTION 5. Map Notation
4 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be
5 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously
6 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are
7 on file in the office of the City Clerk.
8 SECTION 6. Notice of Determination
9 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of
10 Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino
11 certifying the City's compliance with California Environmental
12 Quality Act in preparing the Negative Declaration.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
2
3 RESOLUTION. . .ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 92-10 TO THE GENERAL
4 PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
6 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council Of the City of San
7 Bernardino at a meeting therefore, held on the
8 day of 1993, by the following vote, to
9 wit:
10 Council Members AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
11 ESTRADA
12 REILLY —
13 HERNANDEZ
14 MAUDSLEY
15 MINOR
16 POPE-LUDLAM
17 MILLER —
18
19 City Clerk
20 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day
21 of , 1993.
22
23 W. R. Holcomb, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
24 Approved as to
form and legal content:
25
JAMES F. PENMAN,
26 City Attorney
27 By: Pew rL
28
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . GPA 92-10
TITLE AMENDMENT AREA
firS T V
Z : f
o r
o
Z Al
D I 4�
DUMAS ST
' r D
3
z
0
AREA OF N
PROPOSED •PCW
ATTACHMENT A
i
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO . GPA 92-10
TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL NO. 1 APN 141-431-03
THAT PORTION OF LOT 25, BLOCK 54 , OF THE RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, AS
PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS, PAGE 2 , RECORDS OF SAID
COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 25, THAT IS
SOUTH 89° 47' WEST 838, 16 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
LOT, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO
J.C. GARRETT AND BESSIE R. GARRETT, RECORDED AUGUST 15, 1955 IN
BOOK 3715, PAGE 452 , OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 02 16' EAST
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID GARRETT PROPERTY, 495 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89° 47' WEST 227. 57 FEET,
MORE OR LESS TO A POINT THAT IS 227 . 57 FEET EAST AND 495 FEET SOUTH
OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 25, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO LONNIE S.
BARRIER AND LILLIE A. BARRIER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS,
RECORDED APRIL 5, 1957 IN BOOK 4198, PAGE 53 , OFFICIAL RECORDS;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BARRIER PROPERTY 495 FEET
TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 25; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE
227 .57 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2 APN 141-431-16
THAT PORTION OF LOT 25, BLOCK 54 , OF THE MISCELLANEOUS SURVEY OF
THE RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS, PAGE 2 ,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 RODS SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
LOT 25; THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 24 RODS ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
LOT; THENCE RUNNING WEST 80 RODS TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT;
THENCE RUNNING NORTH 24 RODS; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE BUTTON PROPERTY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 5, 1960 IN BOOK 5102, PAGE 203 ,
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ATTACHMENT B