Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
27- Planning and Building Services
CITY OF SAN BERLARDINO - REQUEST . OR COUNCIL ACTION From: Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Agreement No. 93-01 and Variance No. 93-07 Dept: Planning and Building Services Stubblefield Access Agreement Date: March 17, 1994 MCC meeting of April 4, 1994 Synopsis of Previous Council action: None Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the resolution which adopts the Negative Declaration and approves Variance No. 93-07, and Development Agreement No. 93-01, with amendments as per Staff's recommendation, including subsections a, b, c and d. ti Contact person: A]Rmiahay Phone: 5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report; Resolution Ward: #4 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Descriotion) Finance: Council Notes: 1� il,LlllU�/ y�yL� o3jp �7 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FUR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT Variance No. 93-07 & Development Agreement No. 93-01 Mayor and Common Council Meeting April 4, 1994 REQUEST AND LOCATION The applicant, Stubblefield Construction Company, requests that an agreement be entered into, between the City and Stubblefield Construction Company, to establish and vest the ownership, use and maintenance responsibilities of a primary access road, a non-standard secondary access route (based on the concurrent adoption of Development Code Amendment No. 93-05) and the use of a pipe arch culvert as an emergency access route and equestrian trail (see Exhibit 2, Development Agreement). The intent of the foregoing is to ensure that the subject property shall be provided with legal access to facilitate future development in a manner that will protect the general health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City. The subject property consists of approximately 20 acres located on the east side of State Route 330 (SR 330), approximately 1,300 feet north of Highland Avenue, in the RS, Residential Suburban, General Plan land use designation (see Location Map, Exhibit 1). KEY POINTS The main points of the Development Agreement are summarized on pages 3 and 4 in staff report to the Planning Commission(Exhibit 4). During the Planning Commission hearing, the following issues germane to the proposal were also discussed: • Fire Department Chief Will Wright was present to address the issues of fire prevention and emergency access. He concluded that public safety risks would be minimal due to the fact that fuel modification zones and interior automatic sprinklers would be required for any future development. Further, he stated that the potential size of such a development (approximately 70 homes under the RS designation) would be too small to overburden the emergency ingress and egress routes. • Warner Hodgdon, owner of the Highland Hills Specific Plan property to the east, proposed that constructing a tunnel further north, under Route 330, to connect the east and west frontage roads would provide a feasible alternative to approving a nonstandard secondary access route. A two-week continuance was considered by the Planning Commission to allow staff and Caltrans to review this proposal, but the Commission ultimately concurred with staff that Caltrans could not be expected to respond within such a short time frame. VAR 93-07 & DA 93-01 Mayor and Common Council Meeting April 4, 1994 Page 2 MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OPTIONS 1. The Mayor and Common Council may adopt the Resolution (Exhibit 2) and approve Variance No. 93-07 and Development Agreement No. 93-01 based on the findings in the resolution. 2. The Mayor and Common Council may deny Variance No 93-07 and Development Agreement No. 93-01. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the Planning Commission hearing of February 8, 1994, a motion to recommend approval of Variance No. 93-07 and Development Agreement No. 93-01, was passed by a 5-4 vote (ayes: Cole, Gonzales, Ortega, Romero and Thrasher; nayes: Affaitati, Stone, Strimpel and Traver). The Planning Commission followed staffs recommendation (see Exhibit 4, page 5), which was modified to allow the paved width of the East frontage to remain at 32 feet; the staff report incorrectly stated that the paved width was 36 feet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the resolution, copy attached, which adopts the Negative Declaration and approves Variance No. 93- 07 and Development Agreement No. 93-01 with the following amendments to the Development Agreement: a. That the term of the Development Agreement (Page 4, Item 5) commence upon the effective date of Development Code Amendment No. 93-05; b. That, upon development of the subject property, the developer shall improve the East Frontage Road to a paved width of 32 feet and install curbs, gutters and streetlights and other customary improvements in accordance with City street improvement standards; C. That, in the event that Caltrans does not improve the Secondary Access Road at the time of development, then the Developer shall grade the secondary access road to a width of 24 feet (with proper drainage) and to install an all-weather surfacing of slag or an asphaltic base. d. That, in the event that Caltrans does not grade the bank at the westerly terminus of the Barnes Undercrossing, then the developer shall do so. Prepared by: Gregory S. Gubman, Associate Planner for Al Boughey, AICP, Director Department of Planning and Building Services VAR 93-07 & DA 93-01 Mayor and Common Council Meeting April 4, 1994 Page 3 Exhibits: 1 - Location Map 2 - Resolution 3 - Draft Development Agreement 4 - Staff Report to the Planning Commission for the February 8, 1994 hearing Attachment B - Variance Findings Attachment D - Memoranda from the Fire Chief and City Engineer Attachment F - Initial Study (Attachments A, C, E and G have been incorporated into the above Exhibits) 4 EDIT 1 �T A. a — EDIT 2 © O 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 93-01 3 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 5 SECTION 1. Recitals 6 7 (a) Development Agreement No. 93-01 was considered by the Planning 8 Commission on February 8, 1994 after a noticed public hearing, and the Planning 9 Commission's recommendation of approval has been considered by the Mayor 10 and Common Council. 11 (b) An Initial Study was reviewed by the Environmental Review 12 Committee on August 26, 1993, who determined that the execution of 13 Development Agreement No. 93-01 would not have a significant effect on the 14 environment, and therefore recommended the adoption of a Negative Declaration. 15 The Planning Commission concurred with the recommendation of the 16 Environmental Review Committee at the hearing described in subsection (a) 17 above. 18 (c) The Proposed Negative Declaration received a 30 day public review 19 period from September 2, 1993 through October 1, 1993, during which no 20 comments relative thereto were received. 21 (d) The Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public hearing and 22 fully reviewed and considered proposed Development Agreement No. 93-01 and 23 the Planning Division staff report on February 21, 1994. 24 (e) The adoption of Development Agreement No. 93-01 is deemed in the 25 interest of the orderly development of the City and is consistent with the goals, 26 objectives and policies of the existing General Plan. 27 28 (1) 1 SECTION 2. Negative Declaration 2 NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED 3 by the Mayor and Common Council that the proposed Development Agreement 4 will have no significant effect on the environment, and the Negative Declaration 5 heretofore prepared by the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of 6 this proposed Development Agreement is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. 7 SECTION 3. Findings g BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: 9 A. The proposed Development Agreement is not in conflict with the goals, 10 objectives and policies of the General Plan. 11 B. The proposed Development Agreement will be consistent with the 12 Development Code upon the effective date of Development Code 13 Amendment No. 93-05. 14 C. The proposed agreement will promote the welfare and public interest of 15 the City. 16 SECTION 4. Agreement 17 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: 18 A. Development Agreement No. 93-01 will facilitate and govern the 19 development of the subject property as specifically described in the 20 Development Agreement labeled Attachment 1, a copy of which is 21 attached and incorporated herein by reference. 22 B. Development Agreement No. 93-01 shall be effective immediately upon 23 the adoption and execution of this resolution and the effective date of 24 Development Code Amendment No. 93-05. 25 SECTION 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute 26 on behalf of said City, Development Agreement No. 93-01. 27 28 (2) © O 1 SECTION 6. The authorization to execute the above referenced 2 agreement is rescinded if the parties to the agreement fail to execute it within 3 sixty (60) days of the passage of this resolution. 4 SECTION 7. Notice of Determination 5 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination 6 with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's 7 compliance with CEQA in adopting Development Agreement No. 93-01. 8 SECTION 8. Recordation 9 The developer shall record the Development Agreement in the Office of 10 the County Recorder no later than ten (10) days after it is executed by the parties. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (3) 1 RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 93-01 2 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by 4 the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a 5 meeting therefore held on the 6 _ day of 1994, by the following vote to wit: 7 Council Members AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 8 NEGRETE 9 CURLIN 10 HERNANDEZ 11 OBERHELMAN 12 DEVLIN 13 POPE-LUDLAM 14 MILLER 15 16 17 City Clerk 18 19 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this 20 day of 1994. 21 22 23 Tom Minor, Mayor City of San Bernardino 24 Approved as to 25 form and legal content: 26 JAMES F. PENMAN 27 City Attorney 28 BY: (4) p 0 EX nrr 3 0 O RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Mark A. Ostoich, Esq. GRESHAM, VARNER, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN 600 N. Arrowhead Avenue Suite 300 San Bernardino, CA 92401 AGREEMENT This Agreement("Agreement")is entered into effective _, 1994,between the City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation, ("City") and Stubblefield Construction Company, a California corporation, ("Developer"). RECITALS A. The State Department of Transportation ("CalTrans") has jurisdiction of and has improved certain portions of Route 330, in the municipal limits of the City, as part of State Highway Project CU08201, EA157901 for Route 330 ("State Highway Project"). B. Under a pending agreement between CalTrans and the Developer, CalTrans is reserving and has partially improved (with crushed rock and/or slag), an easement for utility and emergency access purposes ("Secondary Access Road") in the area depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Secondary Access Road will connect Route 330 with certain contiguous real property owned by the Developer ("Developer's Property"). C. In connection with the State Highway Project, CalTrans has also improved and dedicated to the City parts of former Route 330 which are depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("East Frontage Road" and "West Frontage Road", respectively). The East Frontage Road provides direct access between the Developer's Property and Highland Avenue. D. On _, 1994, the City and CalTrans entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("City-CalTrans MOU"), regarding the East Frontage Road, the Secondary Access Road and a pipe arch culvert beneath Route 330 at the location depicted in Exhibit "B" ("Barnes Undercrossing"). Specifically, the City-CalTrans MOU provides for (i)the dedication of the East Frontage Road, the West Frontage Road and the Barnes Undercrossing to the City, and (ii) certain improvements to the chainup area and the existing chain link fence at the Route 330 outlet of the Secondary Access Road. A copy of the MOU is attached hereto as Exhibit .,C,. S\ ASTUBBLETALTRANS.AG 5461-004\3-28-94 1 E. In order to facilitate the development of the Developer's Property and the general health, welfare and safety of the citizens of the City, the parties wish to enter into this Agreement to vest the East Frontage Road, the Secondary Access Road and the Barnes Undercrossing, as legal access to and from the Developer's Property, within the meaning of the laws of California and the City's Charter, Ordinances and Resolutions. For that limited purpose, this Agreement is also intended to be a Development Agreement within the meaning of Chapter 19.40 of the City's Development Code and Section 65864 et seq. of the California Government Code. F. The City and the Developer acknowledge and agree that the City will derive a benefit from this Agreement, inasmuch as the Developer's Property will thereby become developable, creating the opportunity for new jobs and housing and other consequential benefits to the City and its citizens. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS 1. City-CalTrans MOU. The City will use its best efforts to cause CalTrans to perform its obligations under the City-CalTrans MOU including, without limitation, performing the work described in the City-CalTrans MOU. The City will also perform all of its obligations under the City-CalTrans MOU. 2. Dedication. Modification and Maintenance of Access. (a) At such time as CalTrans offers the Barnes Undercrossing for dedication to the City, the City will accept the dedication and will thereafter maintain the East Frontage Road, the West Frontage Road and the Barnes Undercrossing in accordance with its maintenance standards for dedicated public streets. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City acknowledges that the Developer has historical rights of access through the Barnes Undercrossing and also has rights to place and maintain underground utility facilities in an east/west alignment under Route 330, within a 200 foot sector, the center line of which coincides with the center line of the Barnes Undercrossing, and agrees to recognize such rights and cooperate in the exercise of such rights. (b) From and after the development of the Developer's Property, the Developer and its successors and assigns will maintain the Secondary Access Road with an all weather surface, so it is useable for purposes of emergency access. A surface of crushed rock and/or slag is hereby deemed to be an all weather surface within the meaning of the immediately preceding sentence. At the City's request, the Developer will grant the City a non-exclusive, irrevocable license across the Secondary Access Road, for purposes of emergency access. (c) Because the Developer will continue to own, manage and develop the Developer's Property in reliance on the status of the East Frontage Road, the Secondary Access Road and the Barnes Undercrossing as legal, conforming access to and from the Developer's Property, once accepted, none of the East Frontage Road, the West Frontage Road or the Barnes Undercrossing will be abandoned by the City, without the consent of the Developer. In addition, S\OASTUBBLETALTRANS.AG S464-0D4\3-28-94 2 o based on the same reliance by the Developer, the City will not delegate its obligation to maintain the East Frontage Road, the West Frontage Road or the Barnes Undercrossing, without the consent of the Developer. (d) As of the effective date of this Agreement, access from the east side of the Barnes Undercrossing is obstructed by vertical steel barriers which are locked ("Barriers"). At the time of development of the Developer's Property, the Developer and the City will consider in good faith, alternatives to the Barriers which will obstruct free vehicular passage through the Barnes Undercrossing and yet be accessible by residents of the Developer's Property in times of emergency; provided, however that if the Developer and the City are unable to agree on an alternative to the Barriers, which accomplishes the foregoing objectives, then the Developer may remove the Barriers, without replacing them with any facility whatsoever. 3. Legal Status of Roads. The City will recognize the East Frontage Road, the Secondary Access Road and the Barnes Undercrossing, as legal, conforming access to and from the Developer's Property, within the meaning of the laws of California and the City's Charter, Ordinances and Resolutions; provided, however, that the Developer's Property is developed within the density limitations of the RS land use designation in the City's General Plan or such other land use designation which may be approved by the City in compliance with the laws of California and the City's Charter, Ordinances and Resolutions. The City and the Developer acknowledge that the City will have the right to require a traffic analysis and further appropriate improvements to the East Frontage Road, the West Frontage Road and/or the Secondary Access Road, in the event of an amendment to the City's General Plan which increases the density limitations for any development of the Developer's Property, beyond the density limitations of the RS land use designation. 4. Development Agreement. (a) Without limiting the effect of any other provision in this Agreement, the parties acknowledge that the Developer intends to develop the Developer's Property in the future and that, in connection with any such development, the permitted uses of the Developer's Property, the density or intensity of use on the Developer's Property and the maximum size and height of buildings on the Developer's Property will be governed by the development plan for the Developer's Property which is ultimately agreed to by the Developer and the City. (b) The continued status of the East Frontage Road, the Secondary Access Road and the Barnes Undercrossing, as legal, conforming access to and from the Developer's Property, will be subject to satisfaction of the conditions described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. (c) As between the City and the Developer, this Agreement will be subject to amendment as follows: S\O:WrUBBLE\CALTRANS.AG 5464-004\3-28-94 3 o (i) Immaterial amendments to this Agreement may be made by agreement between the Developer and the Director of Planning and Building Services of the City. (ii) Material amendments to this Agreement will require the consent of the Developer, as well as approval by the City's Planning Commission and the City's City Council, following such investigations, findings and other procedures as are required by the laws of California and the City's Charter, Ordinances and Resolutions. 5. Term. The term of this Agreement will commence on the effective date of this Agreement and will continue for 25 years thereafter. However, the parties acknowledge that the objective of this Agreement is to facilitate the development of the Developer's Property by providing legal, vested access to and from the Developer's Property. The parties also acknowledge that circumstances beyond the Developer's control, such as the economy, may delay the development of the Developer's Property. If (a) the Developer's Property is not developed during the term of this Agreement, (b) the same findings as supported the enactment of this Agreement can be made at the time and (c) no other condition exists which would reasonably justify the cessation of the East Frontage Road, the West Frontage Road, the Secondary Access Road and the Barnes Undercrossing as legal access to and from the Developer's Property, then the City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to a request by the Developer for extension of the term of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, on recordation of a parcel map or a subdivision map subdividing the Developer's Property, which parcel map or subdivision map has been approved by the City, the term of this Agreement will automatically extend to a date which is 99 years after the date of the recordation of such parcel map or subdivision map. 6. Indemnification. If this Agreement is legally challenged, then the City will promptly notify the Developer of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the Developer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City. The Developer further agrees to reimburse the City for any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation will not relieve the Developer of its obligations under this provision. 7. Covenant of Good Faith. The parties will cooperate with one another in good faith in the performance of this Agreement, so the intent of this Agreement can be attained. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the City will not require the amendment of this Agreement as a condition of approving any aspect of the development of the Developer's Property. 8. Further Acts. Whenever and as often as it is requested to do so by any other party, each party will execute, acknowledge and deliver or cause to be executed, acknowledged and delivered, any and all such further documents as may be necessary, expedient or proper to achieve the intent of this Agreement. S\O:\STUBBLETALTRANS.AO S464-004U-28-94 4 9. Inurement. The rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement will inure to the benefit of and will bind their respective successors and assigns. Without limiting the effect of the foregoing, the Developer will have the right to assign its rights and delegate its obligations under this Agreement, in whole or in part, to any owner or owners of the Property. 10. Construction. In all cases, the language in this Agreement will be construed simply, according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any party, it being agreed that the parties have participated in the preparation of this Agreement. Without limiting the effect of the foregoing, the parties acknowledge and agree that the City is restricted in its authority to limit its police power by contract and that the limitations in this Agreement are intended to reserve to the City all of its police powers which cannot be so limited. This Agreement will be construed, contrary to its stated terms if necessary, to reserve to the City all police power which cannot be restricted by contract. 11. Severability. Every provision in this Agreement is and will be construed to be a separate and independent covenant and, if any provision in this Agreement or the application of the same is, to any extent, found to be invalid or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement or the application of that provision to circumstances other than those to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected by the same and each provision in this Agreement will be valid and will be enforced to the extent permitted by law and the parties will negotiate in good faith for such amendments to this Agreement as may be necessary to achieve its intent, notwithstanding the invalidity or unenforceability. 12. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original for all purposes and all of the counterparts will constitute one and the same Agreement. 13. Attorneys' Fees. If legal action is taken to enforce or interpret any provision in this Agreement, then the prevailing party in that action will be entitled to recover from the losing party all attorneys' fees, court costs and necessary disbursements in connection with that action. 14. Venue. Any legal action with regard to this Agreement will be brought, at the Developer's election, in either San Bernardino County Superior Court or in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 15. Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals in this Agreement are material and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth hereat. 16. Recordation. No later than 10 days after the date of entry into this Agreement, the Developer will, at its cost, record this Agreement in the Official Records of the San Bernardino County Recorder. [SIGNATURES FOLLOW] S\O:WUBBLE\CALTRANS.AG S464-004\3-28-94 5 0 0 CITY City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation By: Its: Mayor ATTEST City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT Not .4 eroved City Attorfiby 3,-P DEVELOPER Stubblefield Construction Company, a California corporation By: Its: S\WSTUBBLETALTBANS.AG S464-0M\3-28-94 O O STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ) On _, 19_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ) On _, 19_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State. © O SECONDARY ACCESS ROAD EXHIBIT "A" S\O:\STUBBLE\CALTRANS.AG 5464-ODC3-28-96 I 1 n v.f1 •'I� V � �: - ILI \� "full-scale" --exhibi#ice on file at 1— 4`j . the offices of r • ;� ;' MiBBLEFIEWO ♦ ��. -���( � CONSTRUCTION COMPANY � ,• �1 � r �1 1 ,;\� �`; r� �i�.�-Laitr."�1.r DAi r / ryk!: F=t�•� ��' 3 ff ��� ^li r... .2, li �," /it ,,� !;•, � , � / � 1 ,r t, / C� O EAST FRONTAGE ROAD AND WEST FRONTAGE ROAD EXHIBIT "B" S\0:\STOBBLETALTRANSAG 5464 004\3-28-94 It f lilt Is . r g EXHIBIT "Bn Original "full-scale" f` „tt ;I �' �C�.f✓/ IJ� .� exhi ,{ bit on fil , at the offices 7", or /✓<}�. (� � 1� I ,I 5� i ,� �. - iSTUBBLEFIELD %r �$( t 'E- E � 1 ( J� �s���" •°• ',CONSTRUCTION ; ,' >� 't , I�t .� a" !„k,.r' ✓ t COMPANY �11rr?Ip �I,� t : � � ,Y � �! 1 j .., 'irl• f~ "'-iii A , " 6jl ,i- ri,��� � 1_ k'I`� 1� 111 = 1 I. 1 I •, �1� ,T ': "\ (� � . 0 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into between the State of California Department of Transportation, hereafter referred to as "CALTRANS" , and the City of San Bernardino, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" . WITNESSETH WHEREAS, CalTrans and City have conducted extensive discussions over the past several years relative to provision of access to the parcel east of Route 30 and north of Highland Avenue, that is owned by the Stubblefield Construction Company; and WHEREAS, City and the Stubblefield Construction Company are in the process of negotiating an Agreement to recognize the access to this parcel as meeting the requirements of the San Bernardino Municipal Code for development; and NOW, THEREFORE, CalTrans and City, by execution of this MOU, do indicate their intent to accomplish the following actions: SECTION ONE: CalTrans will improve and maintain the "chain up" area, along the east side of Route 330 at the intersection of the Secondary Access Road, in an all weather condition. SECTION TWO: CalTrans recognizes the right of emergency vehicles to breach their access control fence along the east side of Route 330, as required to respond to an emergency situation via the Secondary Access Road, and to issue the necessary permits to relocate the fence post out of the Secondary Access Roadway, including installation of sleeves to facilitate their removal . SECTION THREE: CalTrans agrees to relinquish control of the arch culvert constructed under Route 330, to replace the concrete box culvert known as the "Barnes Undercrossing" , to the City for u se as an emergency access route and equestrian trail . SECTION FOUR: CalTrans acknowledges that there is a bank, at the west end of the pipe arch culvert, which could impede the turning radius for westbound vehicles. If any part of such bank is on property owned or otherwise controlled by CalTrans, then CalTrans shall permit access onto its property, to facilitate the grading of such bank. The grading design shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Chief and the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Signed Title : Date: EXHIBIT "C" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. No later than the time of development of the Developer's Property, the westerly terminus of the Barnes Undercrossing will be graded, in order to improve the turning radius for westbound vehicles. The grading design will be subject to the approval of the Fire Chief and the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 2. No later than the time of development of the Developer's Property, the Developer will complete the grading of the Secondary Access Road, from the East Frontage Road to its intersection with Route 330, to a minimum width of 20 feet and place an all weather surface of crushed rock and/or slag. 3. No later than the time of development of the Developer's Property, the Developer will improve the East Frontage Road to standards which are determined by the Director of Public Works of the City; provided, however that those standards will not be greater than the following: (a) Curb and gutter on the west side of the East Frontage Road. (b) The parties acknowledge that CalTrans previously paved the East Frontage Road to a width of 32 feet. The paved width of the East Frontage Road will not be reduced below the CalTrans paved width. (c) A sidewalk, 4 feet in width, on the west side of the East Frontage Road, immediately behind the curb. (d) No greater than 4 street lights, on the west side of the East Frontage Road, behind the sidewalk. (e) No curb, gutter or sidewalk will be required on the east side of the East Frontage Road. EXHIBIT "D" MASTUBBMCALTBANS.AG 5464-00413-25-94 0 O C I T Y OF S A N B E R N A R D I N O INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: April 4, 1994 TO: Mayor and Common Council FROM: Rachel Clark, City Clerk SUBJECT: Item No. 36 - Public Hearing - Development Agreement No. 93-01 and Variance No. 93-07 - Stubblefield Access Agreement - Replacement Backup COPIES: James Penman, City Attorney; Shauna Clark, City Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- It has come to my attention that the backup material for Item 36, Public Hearing - Development Agreement No. 93-01 and Variance No. 93-07 - Stubblefield Access Agreement does not reflect the correct information. Therefore, attached you will find the replacement backup. Rac el Clark City Clerk RC:mav o/o/�O/ 3� 77 WARNER W. HODGDON HEART M0.RANCH.ARR0DGD SPRINGS POST Om BOX n" SAN BERNARDWO.CALLFORNIA 9M06 pMl 991-1547 14) (7V (]16)99i 6-- 9963 May 1, 1994 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino Mr. Al Boughey, Director Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 RE: Stubblefield Public Hearing May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) West/East Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property (1) Stubblefield Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment (2) Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access Variance (3) Stubblefield Sub-Standard 25-99(124) year Development Agreement (4) Initial Environmental Study and Negative Declaration(IES-ND) Council/Planning Agenda Item 27 Dear Mayor, Common Council and Mr. Boughey: The following is submitted for the Public record regarding the above, but not limited to, related issues: 1. The City and Superior Court approved the May 16, 1989 City/Highland Hills Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement and effective concurrently with the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR. The Homeowners January 14, 1988 Legal Action(s) against the Mayor, Common Council, City Development and Environmental Review Committee (DERC) were Dismissed as part of the Settlement Agreement. The City of Highland had appeared with the Highland Hills Homeowners Association as Amicus Curaie. Other parties to the Settlement Agreement were William E. Leonard, President, San Gorgonio Development Company; William G. Smith (deceased); Rancho San Andreas Company (RSA); Warner Hodgdon and Highland Hills Properties, a Limited Partnership seller by William E. Leonard,General Partner. William c Leonard is the Highland Hillc Ltd Partners General Partner William Cmith(deceased)was a General Partner. Limited yaritica are:Jew., a Marvin Reimer. (Former Sun Publisher) Glen L Hendricks, MD.. Dr. Wilbur and Henrietta Eich. C. L and Leona Ban gsund.Martin and Maret Match Dr Philip and Janet Pope and Dr Elmer Hansen 2. The Highland Hills Homeowners Association, President, Mr. James Nunn, Captain S.B. County Sheriffs Department, appeared before the Mayor and Common Council at the applicable April 4, 1994 Public Hearing and voiced concerns for the Public Record as to the HERFFAGE OF THE MOUNTAWS AND VA y BEGAN W 1150 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFHCE BOX 2W,ARRO"EAD 5RRWG5,SAN BERNARDWO,CAIIIORNIA 92106 RESIDENCE�:5291 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDWO,CAUFORN 92 0,(]IA)9530131 V' A iARNER 9.HOIX:OON fAMLLY GROIR AFF91AiE Page 2 • Genera Association l l Plan/Development opmentCode. Mr. Nunn conveyed that the City was 9 as nowgoing back on that Agreement. 4 Accordingly, Mr. Nunn informed the City of Highland, Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino of the, (1) Stubblefield cast/west Rt. 330 City Creek Scenic Highway Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary Access, (2) Special Code Amendment (3) Variance, and (4) 124 year Development Agreement, June 1992 caused City Creek Downstream Hazards, etc. This matter was discussed on the City of Highland Agenda at the meeting of Tuesday, April 26, 1994. The Highland City Manager requested all related documents from the City of San Bernardino Planning Department. 3. Warner Hodgdon appeared before the Mayor and Common Council at the April 4, 1994 Public Hearing, voiced concerns with solution(s) and submitted various Documentation, City Certified Minutes of July 15, 1991 and March 22, 1993 Council It Directives and Photologs, etc. for the record The City Clerk's Office April 11, 1994 letter ratifies that which was submitted for the Record by Mr. Hodgdon. (Sce attached April 11, 1994 City Clerk's Office letter RE:Wamer Hodgdon submitted documentation) 4. W.J. McKeever Engineering is both engineers for the contiguous Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 "Mountain Shadows" and Rancho San Andreas Company Highland Hills • (Forest Creek Country Club and Resort). The W.J. McKeever April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) submitted to the City document the east/west Rt. 330 existing Sub-Standard to City Full- Standard Costs, and that Two Different City Full-Standard Access Route(s) are Physically and Economically Feasible. (For Reference: See April 4, 1994 City Creek Stenic hive Enviroscape and Improvements Report, Schematic Engineers Plan(s),Cost Estimate(s)and Illustrative Cost Map) 5. On April 4, 1994 the Mayor and Common Council unanimously continued the applicable Stubblefield Agenda Item 36 and Public Hearing for the intent of further City Planning Staff review with the related party(s), i.e.: Stubblefield, RSA, Highland Homeowners Association, City of Highland, etc. Ample time was allowed for this City purpose by the continuance from April 4, 1994 to the Mayor and Common Council meeting of May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. 6. On April 4, 1994 the Mayor and Common Council approved Agenda Item 35, Special Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment and IES-ND. The Mayor and Common Council then approved the required Second Reading at their meeting of April 18, 1994. The effective date is 30 days from City Planning properly filing the Notice of Determination with S.B. County and the State Office of Planning and Research. 7. The April 4, 1994 Stubblefield Special Development Code Amendment Planing Staff Report prepared for Al Boughey, Director of Planning Building Services and Code Enforcement states: "This Amendment proposes a set of criteria that could be used by the City to consider the approval of subdivisions which cannot temiNy provide two standard access route(s). Key Points: 11ERRAGE OF THE MOUNT AND VA12ET BEGAN W IS" O NADQUARTFR5: O OFCE BOX 219 . RW sramOS N Nmo. O 920 W RESIDENCE MAtI3NG:3295 BROADMOOR acU VARD,SAN BERNARDWO,C.AI2FORNIA 92901,(1910.130133 A..J Ri.XOIXiDON FA .Y GRIXR AR n Page 3 "A tentative map may be exempted from providing two standard means of access, 1930.200(6), if the Fire Chief, Planning Director and City Engineer find that:" There is no lejulb1f.alternative to Droviding two to rd access routels) "If a tentative map is located within a Foothill Fire Zone,and the above finding(,[).can be made, the map must still provide nonstandard secondary access to accommodate e..�nrgrnsv veAiclelsl in accordance with the minimum width and local requirements of article IO of the Uniform Fire Code(20 feet). .' d c�ro=�e is an access road that dnos nat meet one or bath of Y„o eriteria stnted at the begirt»ing�of this section. Clearly the Special Development Code Amendment, the April 4, 1994 Planning Staff Report, the Department of Public Works/City Engineer February 2, 1994 Interoffice Memorandum and the Fire Chiefs February 1, 1994, Inter-Office Memorandum addresses the PHYSICAL FEASIBILITY of two City Full-Standard access Route(s) for Public Health and Safety. The Special Development Code Amendment clearly DOES NOT Provide for exempting Public Health and Safety two Different Feasible City Full Standard Access Route(s) under the hidden guise of FINANCIAL FEASIB 8. The City Administration, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement, the Fire Chief and the Department of Public Works voiced no consideration of concern as to FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY for City Full-Standards to Rancho San Andreas (Hodgdon son's) Sterling Avenue Area property through December 19, 1991 to July 3, 1993. Never-the-less Rancho San Andreas Company volunteered two Different Feasible City Full- Standard Development Code Public Health and Safety access route(s) at a Proportionate cost of 4700+ thousand The Sterling Avenue Primary dedicated access is a 6(1 fe?t R/W 40 foot curb to curb Paving sidewalk streetlights trail(s), landscape, trees. irrigation and internal 24 foot curb to curb Paved Secondary Access and Primary Access with 26 foot-16 foot high Multi-Plate Underpass. 9. Per the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommendations, the April 4, 1994 adopted Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code is applicable only for City consideration of Subdivisions which cannot feasibly provide two Full-Standard Access Route(s). May 2, 1994 Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access roads Variance and 124 year Development Agreement: 10. Per the April 4, 1994 Planning Staff Report, the February 1, 1994 Fire Chiefs and February 2, 1994 City Engineers FINDINGS by Inter-Office Memorandum(s), the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommended the Stubblefield Sub- Standard Access Route(s) Variance and 124 year Stubblefield Development Agreement covering the east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property. A Fire Chiefs February 1, 1994 FINDINGS and partial Quote: 'Based on the information available,there dries not een to be a feasible way to provide a standard. econdary access." B. City Engineer's February 2, 1994 FINDINGS and partial Quote: HERfiAGE OF THE MOUNTAD6 AND VALLEY REGAN W 8810 ONEADQUAR M:POST OFFICE ROx 1156,ARRONSE'AD S9NNG5.SAN eERNARDDIO.GtaORN1A 91506 RESIDENCE MAn :5195 9ROADMDOR BOULLVARD,SAN RERNA Wo.GVnVRNIA ft 0 .M4)1834153 WW A vAANEA V.XODLOON FA .y QI MN n Page 4 "The Stubblefield's purpose to use the east Frontage Road is for their primary access. There is no feasible way to provide a standard- secondary acceca to the site." C. The Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement has not twovided his written FINDINGS along with that of the Fire Chief and City Engineer that there is no feasible way to provide a standard, secondary access to the site. This is as required under the newly adopted Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code. 11. The Stubblefields "Mountain Shadows"/Rancho San Andreas Highland Hills mutual Engineer, W.J. McKeever's April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) submitted to the City documents the east/west Rt. 330 existing Sub-Standard Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standard Liability Cost, and that Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s) for Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property are physically and economically Feasible. Variance and Development Agreement "Moot": Therefore the Stubblefield east Rt 330/City Creek Canyon Sub-Standard Access Variance No 93-07 and the 124 year Development Agreement No. 93-01 are "Moot" and not needed as handled and recommended by the Director of Planning Building Services and Code Enforcement. 12. At the April 4, 1994 Mayor and City Council Public Hearing the Deputy City Attorney, Henry Empeno stated the City Attorney's Office position. Accordingly, the City Attorney's office does not approve the Resolution(s) for the Stubblefield Variance and Development Agreement due to: (1) the 124 year term under page 4 and paragraph 5 is 0 uncontionable, and more important, (2) the Development Agreement is not in compliance with the City Code Ordinance(s) or State Law. The Development Agreement must set forth the Land Use and Plan. 124 year City/Stubblefield Development Agreement IES-ND: The Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommended that the Mayor and Common Council approve the Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property 124 year Development Agreement IE -ND. The Initial Environmental Study-Negative Declaration (IES-ND) and Variance is INADEQUATE and the City Consultant/Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement did not address the following future Accumulative Impacts including, but not limited to: 1. The April 15, 1991 Mayor and Common Council Directive to the Department of Planning to process the City Initiated Amendment to the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR RE: Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 766% Density Increase, including 480 High Density Apartments (24 DU's per acre) east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property). The purpose was for the Proposed Settlement Agreement regarding the Stubblefield $11.5 Million. MRIT G OF TM MOUNLADa AND VM NEC"D2IM OHEADQUARTM POST OFF/M MD(211 ,ARROWHEAD SPRDK3,SMi REMURDWO,CMdORNIA 92M IT RESRIF MARSNO:2295 RROADMOOR BOURN ,SAN RERNA WO,CALIFORNIA 921W,(14)SIM153 WWW� A VAI 1 V.HOOD T.Y MI A"91 Page 5 2. Caltrans/Federal Highway Administration constructed a 178 foot protection/retaining wall along east Rt 330 to preserve the Historic 1884 City Creek Canal east of the old City Creek road. The Environmental re-evaluation was under the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Final Section 4(f) evaluation (Historic Properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places), National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC 470F) and California State Historic Preservation 36 CFR Part 800, National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Historic American Engineering Record OLAI R). The measures to minimize harm to the Historic City Creek Canal (City of San Bernardino) were discussed with the Highland/East Highlands Historical Society, the Executive Director of Cultural and International Affairs for the City of San Bernardino, Historic Preservation Task Force, the City of San Bernardino Historic Society and the San Bernardino County Historian. This was in compliance with 36 CFR 800.1 (C) (2), public participation in the Section 10b review process. By June 1992 Stubblefield had bulldozed out the Caltrans/FHWA preserved Historic 1884 City Creek canal east of Rt. 330 and the old City Creek Road, the City Full-Standard(s) width (Minimum 24 feet or more) of the east Rt. 330 Frontage secondary emergency road extension can now be widened under the Caltrans/City MOU to the 124 year City/Stubblefield Development Agreement. This access width then also allows the construction of the north east/west Rt. 330 two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Road(s) Multi-Plate underpass(Minimum 24 feet or more). FHWA July 1990 Final Section 4(F) Evaluation: Historic 1884 City Creek Canal Measures and Minimize Harm: Page 6, Para(s),Quote: As discussed above, there are no feasible and prudent alternatives which avoid the use of Section 4(l)land. The preferred alternative is a feasible and prudent alternative,which,after consideration of mitigation, will result in minimal harm to the City Creek Ditch. The following d sign measures were developed to minimize the harm to the City Creek Ditch." A 178 foot long retaining wall would be constructed at the base of the embankment where the East Frontage Road crosses the City Creek Ditch (see Maps C and D). In so doing, the proposed frontage road would use an existing crossing of the canal. This measure would avoid using any part of the canal east of existing City Creek Road. It is the Darts of the canal east of City Creek Road and west of existing SR-330 that retain the highest degree of integrity (For Reference: See July 1990 FHWA Evaluation Exhibit Topo Map B and Topo Map C of the Historic 1884 City Creek Canal,Eucalyptus Grove large trees) (For Reference: See attached July 1990 FHWA Final Section 4(F)Evaluation for: Rte. 30/330 Freeway Re: 1884 Historic City Creek Ditch) 3. The July 17, 1992 Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement Interoffice Memorandum recommended processing the Stubblefield 44 acre west Rt. 330 Borrow Site,Fill Material Sale to Rt. 330 Caltrans/Contractor, underlying 80 Mobil Homes lots, Primary Access and Draft September 11, 1992 City Consultant IES-ND. The July 17, 1992 Interoffice Memorandum includes, as attached thereto, the July 14, 1992 Planning Department letter to Stubblefield, i.e.: east/west Rt. 330 Frontage Road(s) Connector Underpass built by HERBAGE OF T MOUNTADA AND VALIET BEGAN W IM OHEADQUARTERS:1'05T OFNM BOX 11".ARROWHEAD SFRD9G5.BAN BERNAIIDBJO.CALHO 92 0 W RE9DEN(.E MARSNG:3195 Biu) DMOOR BOULEVARD.SAN BERNARDDiO.CALIFORNIA 92W .(71 4)883-0153 A.. N R..HODI.DOM I---AFiIIIAiE Page 6 Caltrans to City Fire Department Health and Safety Width Specification(s) (Minimum 10 foot wide unpaved Equestrian Trail(s) tunnel). By October 23, 1990 Stubblefield Sworn Declarations, under Penalty of Perjury for the Trial, they represented Agreements to sell Rt. 330 Fill Material from the Mountain Shadows 492 low income Apartment Site and west Rt. 330 Borrow Site to Caltrans Contractor. In April 1989 RSA-Highladn Hills committed to Caltrans/Contractor to provide the Rt. 330 Fill Material at no cost. 4. The March 22, 1993 Mayor and Council Directive to the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement was to process the related Environmental Review of the Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property April 15, 1991 Density Increase, City/Caltrans/Stubblefield three party 50 year Development Agreement, investigate the existing cast/west Rt. 330 Frontage Road(s) Sub-Standard to City Full- Standard City liability cost of improvements/maintenance and un-permitted violations of Code Enforcement per Warner Hodgdon March 22, 1993 letter, documentation and photolog(s). 5. The Stubblefield un-permiteed City Development Code Violations and Downstream Hazards caused by June 1992 from Massive GradingBulldozing of thousands of boulders, debris, tons of foreign material, removal of complete Eucalyptus Grove large trees and stumps, etc. by dumping over the cliffs into the City Creek streambed. Downstream Hazards,but not limited to, impact the SBCT&FCG, EV WD,Caltrans, RSA and existing Homes east of the City Creek Levy in the City of Highland. 6. Caltrans designed the Rt. 330 Freeway to accommodate the City Improvement of the cast/west Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standards Primary Access width, i.e.: 40 foot curb to curb paved section. This is the width Re-evaluated, Re-confirmed, established and approved by Planning, City Fire and City Engineer for the Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Access effective July 3, 1993. 7. The exposure to the City or Stubblefield for this premeditated sub-standard emergency access procedure liability, i.e.: Stop Rt. 330 Freeway Traffic at a point of high degree curve bank super and 7%D grade, cut the Rt. 330 Fence down, pull up the post and then drive emergency vehicles down a 1200 foot 7%D± grade unpaved road is not acceptable. And in the back-up alternative, expose the City even more to another premeditated sub-standard emergency access procedure liability of a minimum 10 foot wide unpaved equestrian multi- plate tunnel at the end of the 1300± foot long 32 foot wide east Rt. 330 Road Cul-de-Sac. 8, The City Full-Standard Improvement of the Sub-Standard west Rt. 330 Frontage Road would require the west extension of the existing Equestrian/Emergency access minimum 10 foot wide unpaved tunnel. The extension required by the City Full-Standard street width would cause IMPRACTICAL, if not impossible, emergency vehicle egress and/or ingress. (40 foot curb to curb paved section plus sidewalk, landscape, irrigation, trees, recreation trail(s) and rail(s), streetlights, drainage,etc.). 9. The improper drainage for the existing west Rt. 330 Frontage Road at the west ingress/egress of the equestrian/emergency Tunnel (Arch Pipe Culvert) has caused the failing of the slope bank(s) and which are sliding into the lower Mobil Home(s). The 3/4 to 1 Cut Slope Bank(s) to the north are also failing from Springs and Instability. This is impacting the Health and Safety of the above Mobil Homes and the City Development Code allows a HERITAGE OF THE MOUNT AND VAl2EY BEGAN W ISM HEADQUARTERS:ro OFHQ BOX 2W,ARROWHP 1D SPRD .Wi BERNMDWO,GIdORNIA 9N06 RESIDENCE MADING:329S BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNA NO,CALIFORNIA 9210{,r/111883 4IS3 A vA0.NE0.v.HO=G FA YGom M}6 n Page 7 maximum 1.5 to 1 Cut Slope Banks only. There is on-going evidence of high potential City Liability. Adopting Resolution: Authorizing and Directing the Mayor to Execute Stubblefield Development Agreement No. 93-01: With sincere knowledge and experience I strongly recommend that the Mayor and Common Council not approve or execute the Draft Resolution or 124 year Stubblefield Development Agreement as prepared and apparently mis-handled The Draft Resolution is written adverse to the Public Health Safety and Welfare of the Citizenry. but not limited to. and is inconsistent to the facts under Section 3 Recitals, Section 4 Negative Declaration, Section 6 Findings Section 8 Notice of Determination and Section 9 Recordation. The 124 year Stubblefield Development Agreement and the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement process therefore is unclear as to: (1) City Sub- Standard Access Procedure Liability, (2) the existing east/west Rt. 330 Sub-Standard Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standards Improvements/Maintenance City Cost Liability and responsibility ($1.5t Million), and (3) the City liability for City blatant non-response to known Stubblefield un-permitted Development Code Violations by June 1992, including Massive Grading/Bulldozing, removal of the 1884 Historic City Creek Canal, removal of complete Eucalyptus Grove large trees and stumps, debris, thousands of boulders and tons of foreign material dumped over the cliffs into the City Creek Streambed causing serious Downstream Hazards to Public/Private Facilities,i.e.: SBCI'&FCG, EVWD, Caltrans, RSA and existing Homes east of the City Creek Levy, in the City of Highland I reconfirm our April 4, 1994 Public Position and concern for City Full-Standard(s) with no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. RSA-Highland Hills will participate in the proportionate east Rt. 330 Frontage Road Improvement(s)/Maintenance District(s) cost, including like consideration for Rt. 330 City Creek Scenic Highway Landscape. Thank you for your time and consideration. We believe the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland Deserve City Full-Standard Streets ... Too. Respectfully, /Warner l W. Hodg on Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Shaun Clark,City Administrator Al Boughey,Director, Planning,Building Services and Cade Enforcement Roger Hardgrave,City Engineer Will Wright, Fire Chief HEMAGE OF THE MOUNrA AND VA Y BEGAN M 12" OHEADQUARTERS:R OFFICE BOX 2116,ARROWHEAD SRRBVCd.SAN BERNARDE60.CALRiTR 92b RESIDENCE MA G:5295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDDi0,CALFORNIA 92101,()11)2830155 WW A VAR A V.HODC FMI¢Y.—ARIIIATE �p�eRRNARp�ho C9t C I T Y O F 0 NaED 1N,0��a an Bernardino R A C H E L C L A R K C I T Y C L E R K April 11, 1994 Warner W. Hodgdon Heart Bar Ranch, Arrowhead Springs P.O. Box 2146 San Bernardino, CA 92406 Dear Mr. Hodgdon: This is to acknowledge receipt of the documents you submitted during the Mayor and Council meeting held on April 4, 1994 relative to Development Code Amendment No. 93-05, Agenda Item 35, and Development Code Amendment No. 93-01 and Variance No. 93-07 Agenda Item 36 as follows: Letters dated February 18, February 20, and April 4, 1994, directed to Al Boughey, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement; Letter dated February 8, 1994 , directed to Robert Stone, chairman of the Planning Commission; Letter dated April 4 , 1994, directed to the Mayor and Common council; Report Book, Schematic Engineering Plans and Cost Estimates entitled "city Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements east/West Rte. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police - Fire- Emergency - Recreation Trails" prepared by Aaron Hodgdon and Warner Hodgdon dated April 4 , 1994. The Mayor and Common Council voted to continue the matter to May 2 , 1994 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. Sincerely Diane Jones Dalp7aty Oi ty I( lie rk o X 1 3 1 6 , S A N 0 E R N A R D I N O , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 4 0 3 PRIDE 14 C 0 0 N O R T I 40IN�PROGRESS C A L I F O N N I A 9 2 4 1 8 - 0 0 0 1 (Y 0 0) 3 6 4 - 5 0 0 2 (9 0 9 ) 3 6 4 - 6 1 0 2 F A X -(6 0 9) 3 6 4-6 4 6 6 i CITY/ED AVENUE �,� COORDINATED wJTN CALIRANs are 330 PLANS 6. ACCESS ON \�\ STORM D PR EMENTS y COST ESTIMATE: $13 MILLI NO BER 4 1 EASTIWEST RTE. 330 FREEWAY CITY DEVELOP GREEMENT 0.96445 N, - I I CITY FULL-STANDARDS ACCESS CITY/ED ST S MI A LLI, . COST TOTAL $166,248 it :dry i Q2 $161,382 h ; 0 $744,596 $342,659 SUB-TOTAL $1,414,885 \. I i ❑5 ENVIRONMENTAL z 3z II LANDSCAPE $887,197 r_ GRAND TOTAL $2,302,082 _ h RTE. 330 SCENIC DRIVE Z C[!Y OF SB TRADS ALIGNMFM• ADOFLED G.P.FEIR.JULY IM RTE. 330 FREEWAY SCENIC DRIVE FORE " n : I ``j WAIMR ACCESS • zz- IBM WATER ACCESS, USFS/HIGHLANDRECREATIO \,JLICE • FI ERGENCY TRAILS DEDICATED "NATION/ /-(JTy FU L , STANDARDS ACCESS TRAITS DAY" 6-5-93. ! I VI2�_RP�S (RECREA PION LS) �/✓ C)ST.. $342,659 NORTH FORK DITCH 1 101 . t�S•��SVF7kD. +1MR, ,Sv .�Aiarfl�t pSHA�30WS� 171 ARDS ACCESS , \ III4IMEND1yp:,RTI iTO SUB-Ws NDARDS O kM IDE AMENDMENT 1 CARRIAGE HHlE / in �'ANOAXD CITY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ' Geaen RUARY 9,1994 AS OUTLINED TO PLA UNG COMMMON TH/SAFETY RTE, 330 APPRPR TANDARDS ACCESS ° EwaY - cITY CREEK SCENIC DRIVE WAR IND RD FEASIBLE ACCESS ROADS AND E - MAINTENANCE DISTRICrcci • ` / r Eno F III s 0 C V L C � o .^ U w S U � z F W T z >1 U O 5 E O c z W c A c � 3 W o � U a . . � U ¢ '� 3 = > xw °' ° ax Qo Y 4 o A . A c0. ' v F °' `" ate' U Z .E d � c E Qu U � 3 N z Ex � vM U c n" ca N O U N N >. y� Q E M � V �p � a � oEE QUn t• 1VV. M L U V] Oro N e7„ 7' in ^ En 7: v U E y o Q = ° o 8� LE U av y E > W Q o .E eny� c a.o a UW " x .vU ° EE E a: v. ^�oE3 q gip° o 7 c 8 o o v ti w n ¢ > o q tiA a c Y 3 . ei cU V) A � v7 A 0. w U'a C4 :2 Ix wFU Qb � cLID Q nI Op r� h C U 00 V)00 A tE 6�a C arz U0. : xUU :2:2 A o � 0. F � � o � M r- o �� � dai �uv a1 c o 3 s O c M•� c'�. o G a � � PD 'may~• ou AA �� U .7 >> pO11�S 7 co U M �•-�IN n W � ds us vs U U U v us � _ AnAc►hn� (� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FINAL SECTION 4 (f) EVALUATION FOR • CONSTRUCTION OF STATE ROUTE 30 FROM ARDEN AVENUE TO FIFTH STREET . AND ROUTE 330 FROM ROUTE 30 TO 0.7 MILE NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE 08-SBd-30-R26.7/R30. 3 08-SBd-330-28.7/30. 3 08201-157901 a Prepared by: Department 'of Transportation - District 8 y San Bernardino, California JULY 1990 w CL < ! o �• — . . W • D � i ti m YI rn i 1 i ivl 9>i /,t. 9 t• f'r,• i� 0 CY CD 1n I f } ` iijjy� �ft �e}�,i 11,/ g = ¢ p O m EE ii p 0 – N m , 0 o� \ �RMa UM (?M `o . .__ _....__ _ ,.T�d �whln W Y–a: NI– OK of Y y¢ WIrY ZO _ � ^siY D N ?'^a CO � OM CL i8f� nn � � N fY Y KZ¢ Y w - • o ' CD �I Z Oa oo. S0N1tldf DMIH i "�� 4 — Q N O 04 — � . — 7N : p = : o 0 O t�' h ;N II _ GP NO C –O x Z Q W N O Z M !� III[[[��"""ZZZ]� w c co o N w ®� 4. 3aovu�Y a3ainoa ; F W 0 Z W � w � � O ! m m /I II 4 =� YpIS J O V Z Q V � a Q Q O W O tld 10.0 X050 NbV II TO REM N z � ' , .� i F— = y, ZOV - �I �O OC Z O c oc Z = A3 MY ¢ N Z V a a�.. p j =e nP Dan%o 0 V R 1 YIIPd ! LL v i 0 o � 10 a Cr Z = M LL 0 W 0 W 0 M 0 r 3oNVao f , Z Z O v7 Z W• $ W W Q N Q W m J d a P Palrl3o a Z � �. Z In @ Q F mCOO V U ¢ a U. w m O 2� !n 0 N AP(1 CL LL z, j Y T_ F n y CN ° P 0 O N Z 14 O j T yfj o-, n O l-. Z c < O. f ¢ O u N o F O n n vfi ° ,p v, ^ i OM O h N m °- n c °; °° y{ °° ,3 a. i Nd a o ♦T i o h lD W �' O O n ♦ 'l6l Z ° VI N N Q o CC ZF- mKo M N z n do T � � � „ YaS � gEg u : N V �Fd Z N J w O j° m 'JO m 3AP DNIla31S W U MO N - j`1 _ N r, f YI ,p h < T O _ _ _ • O V F O �. 4�ag L « j£g O C OS 4�%J1 S Y O mn j a 0 1p O Cua 00 $? r . . i •Yrw..Y>u vYOI. 1 • naa un�Y na +., I i �•_ ;; ,• •ate >- ~ .. %. i 1 11,13 =;fir^_ JJ ���_-..�_-�--r •,�.. �:, •aq:';`\•: �.;`1 W 5;1l1;�' 1 1 •� < , . .,.�: h ,., �� � /. III�� �� \'C•. , 'c./:z�, \ 1 '� - ' f � i � •Y ., �Y\•\f�_•,w. lli>\a� W 'V`�` \ / �� S' r r�� `' ! y I I �: �'` •.Y i � r:�. • I •Y f ¢ 1 ,w,ytaw � ! r @1f ! � . � O Om 1 . Tit MY f,"l;qud IV f Is ref tt • �. ��f / t o' �� A 0 +'1 —� _ _ /1 r I u ��• ■ �1,�j1 jYe•'�'_ _R_^�_�%,// r/���� y� I��/; /'�y ' '� � � "_ � �`y�P `i��g�_(�i Z a C 7 � a � A \.J •• . \ /� �%� -----'.-\�/�/�)��■ / ltIlIl� � _ /•� .\ ■' �• ?tom ^n �. o R � F aou "c •!1• • '.•I 1 /•. -/•,'...'l, VA: ' _ .F \■�� \ I X11 ` ;� • is �-- r E _ a W �. I , -../ ''..1r Ir��, � I_f. Q \ _./�1 1:\'11�: l� .� 1,�,I.� •��`� Ot t� _ � `•� � ._.���/��f� 1 • • q q • R J C. O > G r' R V G • � T�J 3' Vu ' M 9 M 4 �Q a� • Wq a M d= dy �+ a r Cti m� _T ^f W G • o � d a ee T,Q W dC �d C i • Q v a� my x .d. W <H 59 T • U p >. t`WK 4.. am E F N • • N N T N iy p� Q Q O C V W A �'a • � 5 U� a �.v U `° a `07 �P � 3� �^ V iia �—J F M"i ar y�' .7.�+ • t��. .....i o'n 'L'� n a, A � 6`� } G Pr W • w� d NQ �CC T y • ,�, a`� eb y w z:2 -' '� e.. t � e� �; 'O U _ � y ,�Y' a ..A � J:L ... i� ��� Y rve� 5 L�. 0 s T �A • F. d u v A r LOOS ru z # � U y40 o. a 0 � uT C + y o� D W T v F x a �y Cr ' a 7` ,. ,oll, Y All x s � P ®® R tt r w Y ( 1 xl ' tf t�t2 .. � { # , 9y Y n y, 0 t(4,r4 IZ 5� ��� t.�Y I s"•p)t(�t" � �,YhI t ��?i � X S , x� �d YYY,� ', C F .�.�. H t Yn Sr Lyj 3'.y 'U ff G ll A a \ y � �M a it SRI • G i f � r • �s'i'r �s';�.. �'• ,�,�+ P " 'A M���111;a„� :�I �, x} z.n.,,, � m �• .. � � � Vin# 4�' ,�� o� f i T L C, s� iti �M T '•�, rr l,� ao n uo� L.VIj l � T N:ii•._ � G y N G •4i ar7 a I Q 3 ” N +Ni t ! a i - � k dm � 3 { a . r r - kt _ g s k �$ �_ .� a 3 • r �Z:Y* 1 (!T S P pI ti Sr v O. W 4 Y a at; c o �y� 2 � F h O � a _ _ c R v v RIt I �N... r14 �� y 4 d I � Icy S WARNER W,HOWWDW . HEART N RANCH,ARROWHEAD BRINGS 105(OM 10X 216 SAN RERNARDINO.CM2rORNU1 92906 (714)111.1592 (714)086: Q14)986-9913 May 2, 1994 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 RE: Stubblefield Public Hearing May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) West/East Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property (1) Stubblefield Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment (2) Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access Variance (3) Stubblefield Sub-Standard 25-99 (124) year Development Agreement (4) Initial Environmental Study and Negative Declaration (IES-ND) Council/Planning Agenda Item 27 Dear Mayor and Common Council: At the April 4, 1994 Public Hearing regarding the above, I presented and submitted related letters, documentation, photologs and the City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements April 4, 1994 Report. Enclosed herewith is the City Clerk's office April 11, 1994 letter ratifying the various comprehensive deliverables submitted for the Public Record on April 4, 1994. (See attached April 11, 1994 City Clerk's office letter RE: Warner Hodgdon deliverables submitted for the related Public Record April 4, 1994,Council Agenda Items 35 and 36) I hereby submit the following this date, May 2, 1994, to the Mayor and Common Council and the City Clerk for the Public Record: 1. Warner Hodgdon March 22, 1993 and February 15, 1993 letter(s), attachments(s) and Photolog(s), etc. submitted to the Mayor and Common Council for the Public Record March 22, 1993 RE: City Attorney Outside Council and Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property 50 year Development Agreement with City Maintenance. Sworn Testimony used in Stubblefield April 2, 1991 $11.5 Million Damages Trial, and Sterling Avenue Area. 2. The above Warner Hodgdon March 22, 1993 and February 15, 1993 letters, attachments and Photolog(s) etc. were Re-submitted for the Public Record to the City Development Environmental Review Committee (DERC) and Planning Staff at the DERC meeting of August 26, 1993 RE: Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s): (1) Special City Sub-Standard Access Development HERBAGE OF TM MOUNTAM AND VALLEY BEGAN W 1150 OHEADQUARTERS:8 OFFICE ROX 216,ARROWHEAD 97INM SAH RERNARDa10,CAtJF9RNIA 92906 RESIDENCE MARJNG:5295 RROADMOOR ROULLVARD,SAN RERNAR M,CAUFOR 9109,(714)113-0135 WWW A WARNER V.HOIX' FAM¢Y QlOU1 AflIl _ Page 2 Code Amendment, (2) East/West Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Variance, and (3) 25-99 (124)year Development Agreement, IES-ND(s). 3. Warner Hodgdon April 19, 1993 letter and attachments to Henry Empeno, Deputy City Attorney RE: DERC April 15, 1993 meeting, Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) re-submitted for the Public Record to the DERC and Planning Staff at the DERC meeting of August 26, 1993 RE: Stubblefield three March 26, 1993 City Sub-Standard Access Planning Application(s), IES(s) and ND(s). 4. Warner Hodgdon February 20, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Fire Chief Will Wright RE: February 8, 1994 Planning Commission Meeting for Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s). 5. Warner Hodgdon April 5, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Fire Chief Will Wright RE: April 4, 1994 City Council/Planning Public Hearing for Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s). 6. Warner Hodgdon April 19, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Fire Marshall Guy Burdick RE: Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s), and City Administration, City Planning, City Fire and City Engineer non-concern of Rancho San Andreas Company Financial Feasibility for the Sterling Avenue Area Two Feasible Full-Standard Access Road(s). 7. Warner Hodgdon April 20, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Shauna Clark, City Administrator RE: City Creek Scenic Drive Enviroscape and Improvements April 4, 1994 Report (Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) for Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s). (Underpass Connector and Frontage Road(s)). Stubblefield un-permitted City Development Code Violations caused by Massive Grading/Bulldozing, Removal of Trees and Stumps, removal of Historic 1884 City Creek Canal, dumped debris, boulders, foreign materials dumped over the cliffs into the City Creek Streambed creating Downstream Hazards. 8. Warner Hodgdon April 21, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer RE: City Administrator's early 1994 request for Stubblefield east Rt. 330 20 acre property review for June 1992 un- permitted Massive Grading/Bulldozing, City Development Code Violation(s). 9. Warner Hodgdon April 29, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer RE: Sterling Avenue Area City Full- Standard Two Different Feasible Access Route(s) and Multi-Plate Underpass preferred by the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement, HERBAGE OF i MOUNFAD65 AND VAISEY BEGAN M 1950 OHEADQUARtERS:9 OFFRZ BOIL 31",ARROmHEAD 59RBiG5,SAN BERNA Nol GUDOR 92106 ♦� RESLDENQ MARSNG:3"S BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDNO,CALIFORNIA 91101,M4)98}0153 VV" A iAR V.XOpGOOX FA Y ADW Page 3 Fire Chief and City Engineer for required Rancho San Andreas Improvements with no concern as to Cost Feasibility, and Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s), April 1994 Caltrans Rt. 330 Project Engineer confirmed Stubblefield un-permitted Massive Grading/Bulldozing, Removal of trees and stumps, Historic 1884 City Creek Canal, etc. 10. Warner Hodgdon May 1, 1994 letter for the Public Record to the Mayor and Common Council and Al Boughey, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement RE: Stubblefield Public Hearing May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. Council Agenda Item 27, i.e.: Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Sub-Standard Access Route(s) Variance and 20-99 (124) year Development Agreement. The City Attorney's Office stated on April 4, 1994 that it does not approve of the Resolution(s) for the east/west Rt. 330 Stubblefield Sub-Standard Variance and 124 year Development Agreement. The 124 year Term is uncontionable, and more important the Development Agreement is not in compliance with City Code Ordinance(s) or State Law. The Development Agreement must set forth the Use and Plan. I reconfirm our April 4, 1994 Public Position and concern for City Full-Standard(s) with no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. RSA-Highland Hills will participate in the proportionate east Rt. 330 Frontage Road Improvement(s)/Maintenance District(s) cost, including like consideration for Rt. 330 City Creek Scenic Highway Landscape. Thank you for your time and consideration. We believe the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland Deserve City Full-Standard Streets ... Too. Respectfully, Warner1W. Hod don Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Shaun Clark,City Administrator At Boughey,Director, Planning,Building Services and Code Enforcement Roger Hardgmve,City Engineer Will Wright,Fire Chief HERITAGE OF THE MOUNTA AND VALLEY BEGAN N IS" (}J OHEADQUARTERS:POST OF HCE bX 11".ARROWHEAD QRWGS.SAN RFJWARDWp.fA{pOR 92b (�7 RESIDENCE WA G:)193 BROADMOOR BOUIEVARD,SAN BERNARDndO,CAIdO 93AM,(914)993 IS) A VARNEA V.HOpGpON FM YM"ARO n 1LNARpTho P Cy 5 C I T Y O F O �OG'�AED 114 an bernardino R A C H E L C L A R K C I T Y C L E R K April 11, 1994 Warner W. Hodgdon Heart Bar Ranch, Arrowhead Springs P.O. Box 2146 San Bernardino, CA 92406 Dear Mr. Hodgdon: This is to acknowledge receipt of the documents you submitted during the Mayor and Council meeting held on April 4 , 1994 relative to Development Code Amendment No. 93-05, Agenda Item 35, and Development Code Amendment No. 93-01 and Variance No. 93-07 Agenda Item 36 as follows: Letters dated February 18, February 20, and April 4 , 1994, directed to Al Boughey, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement; Letter dated February 8, 1994 , directed to Robert Stone, Chairman of the Planning Commission; Letter dated April 4 , 1994 , directed to the Mayor and Common Council; Report Book, Schematic Engineering Plans and Cost Estimates entitled "City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements east/West Rte. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police - Fire- Emergency - Recreation Trails" prepared by Aaron Hodgdon and Warner Hodgdon dated April 4 , 1994. The Mayor and Common Council voted to continue the matter to May 2, 1994 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North f1D11 Street, San Bernardino, California. Sincerely, Diane Jones Deputy Ctity l01jerk o x T ] T s , S A N B E R N A R 0 1 N O , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 4 0 2 3 0 0 N O R T H D S T R E E T , S A N B E R N A R D 1 N o . PRIDE IN PROGRESS C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 4 1 B - 0 0 0 f ( G O Y ) ] ] 4 - S O O T ;. (9 0 0 1 ] ! 4 - 5 1 0 2 F A % -(0 O B I 3 6 4 5 4 6 8 q WARNER W. GD HODON HEART BAR RANCH, H OGD SFMNGS 8 OFFICE BOX 11% SAN BERNARDMO.CAL"RMA 924M pH)981-130 (714)596-992 April 19, 1994 Fire Marshall Guy Burdick City of San Bernardino 200 East Third Street San Bernardino, California 92410 RE: April 4, 1994 Report City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements East/West Rt. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police,Fire,Emergency,Recreation Trails (Walking,Jogging,Bicycle,Equestrian) Stubblefield 25-99 Year Sub-Standard Development Agreement,and April 4. 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimates) for: Two Different Feasible City Fell-Standard Access Route(s) Dear Fire Marshall Burdick: Thank you for meeting with Aaron and me on Friday, April 15, 1994 regarding the above and our applicable February 20, 1994 and April 5, 1994 letters to Chief Will Wright. I reconfirmed my sincere concern for City Full-Standard(s) with no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. As Chief Wright was out of town when we met, Aaron and I are available at his earliest convenience to briefly review the April 4, 1994 Report confirming Public Health and Safety documentation with him. The Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimates(s) depict that there are Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s) for the East/West Rt. 330 Primary/Secondary Frontage Roads. (For Reference;See attached April 4, 1994 Front Cover and limited Map(s)Schematic Engineering Plants)photologs) The Planning Public Notice confirmed the Stubblefield property to be 19.17 acres and the July 3, 1989 Updated city General Plan land use RS 4.5 DU's per acre. This equates to a total of 86.265 ± DU's. According to Planning's July 14, 1992 letter to Stubblefield, the Rt. 330 Sub- Standard unpaved minimum 10 foot width Equestrian Tunnel (Pipe Arch Culvert) was built to Fire Department width and height specifications. I know this is not true and gratified that Fire did not write such a letter. The Equestrian Tunnel east entry is located at the end of the 1300± foot long east Rt. 330 Cul-de-Sac. The Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property to the north is then severed by the 1300 ± foot long Cul-de-Sac road. When we met, the April 4, 1994 Report provided you had by Velo Binding error omitted the first section covering the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement east/west Rt. 330 Stubblefield Sub-Standard Recommendation(s) to the Mayor and Common Council on April 4, 1994. Aaron exchanged the prior Report provided you with one of complete context at your office on April 18, 1994. HERBAGE OF TIM MOLRrrA1M AND VALLEY BEGAN N 1830 OHEADQUARTERS:F OFFICE BOX 1196.AAROFp1EAD 1VRWCS,SAN RERNAAMO.CAeRMMA 91406 IT RESIDENCE MARMG:3193 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDmO,CAl3PoRMA 91404.(714)2110133 3W� A WARMII W.XOpLpON FA y Gag AFMI Page 2 According to the April 4, 1994 Planning Department Staff Report for the Stubblefield Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment, the key points included. Ouote 19.30.200(6), A tentative map may be exempted from providing two standard means of access, if the Fire Chief Planning�irector and City Engineer find that: • There is no feasible alternative to providing two standard access routes As you know, we outlined the Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s) for the Stubblefield east Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property to the Planning Director and Planning Commission on February 8, 1994. The Planning Department had not investigated the east/west Rt. 330 Sub-Standard Frontage Roads to City Full-Standards liability cost and as Directed by the Mayor and Common Council on March 22, 1993 for the City/Caltrans/Stubblefield 50 year Special Development Agreement. Therefore. I understand that mV February 4 1994 outline was given subceguent to Chief Wrieht's February 1 1994 Interoffice Memorandum: Ouote: "Based on the information available, there does not seem to be a Feasible way to provide a standard secondary access". In addition, the April 4, 1994 Planning Department Staff Report represents that the 25-99 (124 year) Stubblefield Development Agreement is based on the adoption of City Special Sub- Standard City Development Code Amendment No. 93-05 and the use of a (Rt. 330) Pipe Arch Culvert as an emergency access route and Equestrian Trail. This 10 foot minimum width sub- standard Pipe Arch Culvert is located at the end of a 1300 foot long east Rt. 330 Cul-de-Sac leading to Stubblefield 20 acre property. As you can ascertain from the Caltrans Rt. 330 AS-BUILT PLANS found in our April 4, 1994 Report, the existing Equestrian Trail lie Arch Culvert underpass referred to by Planning is an unpaved Equestrian/Recreation underpass with a 10 foot minimum width only to provide emergency vehicle access. This Sub-Standard emergency access is at the end of Planning's recommended 32 foot curb to curb paved road width for the 1300 foot long east Rt. 330 Cul- De-Sac. Constructing the east/west Rt. 330 Connector to provide Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Routes, via a Multi-Plate Underpass (24 foot minimum or more) to the north is in accordance with April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimates therefore. This will honestly fulfill Planning's represented objectives in their Staff Report, "to provide the general health safety and welfare of the Citizens of the City" (Police • Fire • Emergency Recreation Trails). A City Full-Standard width Multi-Plate Underpass is not unusual or a mystery to the Department of Planning, Building Safety and Code Enforcement, City Fire or the Engineering Department. On June 4 and 16, 1992 Aaron and I outlined the dedicated January 22, 1986 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area primary/secondary access with City Full Standard 28 foot multi-plate underpass (pipe arch culvert) serving RSA Secret Hollow Ranch (Woodland Heights) to City Planning, Fire and the City Engineer. City Planning, Fire and City Engineering preferred the January 22, 1986 Dedicated 60 foot R/W with 40 foot curb to curb paved Dedicated Sterling Avenue Primary Access and north therefrom the two Different Feasible paved City Full- HEW E OPT MOUNTAM AND VA12EY BEGAN V 1150 QMADQUARTERS:POST OP BOX 21".ARROiNEAD SlR ,SAN BERNARDDJO,CA1pORN1A P3106 RESMEN WADING:3VS BROADMOOR BOUIEVARD,SAN BERNA NO,CM550RN1A S2",17141 123 0153 �WWr A AMR V.MOOCDDN IAAOLY f30N A1TJAiE Page 3 Standard 24 foot Primary/Secondary Access road(s) separated by one access having a City Full- Standard Multi-Plate Underpass (24 foot minimum). The City Foothill Recreation Trails(s) alignment was also recognized. There was no concern by the City. City Planning, City Fire and City Engineering as to how much the CiiY Full-Standard width and height multi-plate underpass (Pipe Arch Culvert) would cost RSA for Public Health and Safety. In addition, RSA volunteered to share $400 thousand of the 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area primary/secondary access Improvement/Maintenance District cost. The Dedicated January 22, 1986 City Full-Standard Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Public Roads and access was then re-evaluated, re-confirmed, established and approved by the City DERC, Planning Commission, Mayor and Council by May 24, 1993, with Improvement/Maintenance District(s), the effective date of the State Office of Planning and Research being July 3, 1993. Aaron and I then met with you and Fire Inspector Paul Allaire to assure that we handled the Secondary Access Gate(s) to Fire required specifications; i.e.: automatic gates with manual provision and back-side entry KNOX LOCKS. City Pre-Mediated Sub-Standard Emergency Access Procedure Liability: To be frank, I cannot understand the City and Stubblefield spending the years described trying to perfect east Rt. 330 Sub-Standard access when Two Different City Full-Standard(s) Development Code Route(s) are feasible. The exposure to the City for the pre-meditated sub- standard emergency access procedure liability alone is not worth it to the City or Stubblefield; i.e., Stop Rt. 330 Freeway traffic at a point of high degree bank super and 7%D ± grade, cut the Rt. 330 non-access six foot chain link fence down, pull up the post and then drive emergency vehicles down a 1200 foot unpaved 7% t grade road. And in the Back-Up alternative expose the City even more to another pre-meditated sub-standard emergency access procedure liability of a minimum 10 foot wide unpaved equestrian multi-plate tunnel at the end of the 1300 foot± long 32 foot wide east Rt. 330 Road Cul-De-Sac. Thank you and Chief Wright for your time and consideration. Please call us if Chief Wright is available to meet for review or further clarification. We believe, San Bernardino Deserves City Full-Standard Access Street(s) ... Too. Sincerely, Ca/L�u�i•C-e' Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Fire Chief Will Wright Paul Allaire,Fire Inspector Mayor and Common Council Roger Hardgrave,City Engineer James F. Penman Shauna Clark,City Administrator Al Boughey,Director of Planning,Building Services and Code Enforcement HERBAGE OF THE MOUNrA AND VAI IYY REGAN IN IISO HEADQUARTERS:r OFf10E ROR 31".ARROmHt:N SPRWGS,SAN RERNAR 0-f:AIdORMA 92M W RESIDENCE MANNG:329S RROADMOOR ROMXVARD,SAN RERNARDNO,CALDO 924 .(714)9E3d115 A fA11NEl 1.XDa 1-1 Gl_AA _ • r'40) Uo vt o 04 U � . � W w �mFr f fill, YAW - AMA /i /1 110A VNf l Tim / ,,� • A � Ea y > " r � W ey t C a A 6TQ • . v U � o • � � aa H E • w U i • L • \�� ( � � C •VL Q u , !A ��LAYfi4C- • Y W W� � L' Ii) i s!� E c s ? �liill d " C ry� •L d a C e C m n A J I I i � 1 •L �L w P A � v I ¢ wo � it �wo j x, zz W $ Q 0 / ( �48 W z i Bd3>s< k \ 6S � m o | 1 � \ ] k q§ !2S 2 Z � § �}_§ \ ƒ! \ § )§f22 •� o«§) \3$)u Z ■ �� � $ h - � � � � �) 2 | I , , 00 -Z ) f \ | � ! \ \ ■ two ` $ , ■ ■ ■� ■ ■ t; § � ■ � � � . . � . . | . • C q O q wd o - d' 9 e n yti �/ W Uz sw � v • � U � a rTl rA v L' _ � xon • � w � W U � x ` Wa M 3 • (s7 a 1�1 a UD hw bt 0. I Cfj • • O o O d L C Eno CL 4 ' C C W • O w W e � e eL D � n • A E o r � � e R 6 fL 6 O A a � A W � a � w � U • • o v R'Cs$ • i � SySSS Wr W cc Q om£yyol1ag Eggs " O aazs�gOt E" �£Pg.s s" s CL Ec>�E3H Rg o .o'x9 18 V-Pli'm c 0 �He E�nb� 5 Eu° rl W � E 4 - 4 `e r�u^ a W sA�A a W E p E 0 r-4 �A ,p E W V rr: z9E r m A #. { V I ►'�\ Eo mS F. m t}y I - U y 3 r a Eo U] < MBA S R ^ $Eo VVVPPPddd � E � W �Q� `a you SE tl E ro E w� 3T g 'r ' E E y 0 E q EWE �. E€ Egg' Pg. g m 3m . m 9 3 g€o tmm»c . a q agW €' °' uu� am•m`�E �?'E ooz°na $ 'j xe I6E 3g:_m SE a ?ms _€ o.m i ! e 1 S s Eic s OOFV 10 i i C '\.:< 1 e; IB! G,G;;j IGi l E ;FEI a l i I'� ` i 11 # i 31 j iGg !I— /z / t s 1 Ee � c I I €g•4G�'' !i illij Ild 1 fu!I «yy�£,F el i3 `s: r p I4EsSi � o ttI 3 u g �. S+e, f ••( ¢a +r tt v 5 1 `a Cal o a N Cd 1! w /1 EE b�I!!11' •f.EtEl g I S �4�•ei.= ,r =� � ` " r � �f Ail a .I:� Esll; � � � ?_��ff•�� Y �� =3f� . ,,1 .,/ �F ! Er°t i!�i: � € t•:Gat� W 9spill M10 e 121 OM 4 Ei:3ct3 y .. r � ... •1 .. e �9 Rl �CCq�1 o I J T� "• 1 I /Iln4 L byL �! i E° S � °, ..I°Ilai°� `+ ii i g✓ \r (I i � i 3. I 1 ! e A ;StxSl'3 Is SSt '}, r � p 'a=eb � ! 11 I!Irnli Ilill!III°P 1 YI .7� / ° I tell aiiit 4 E. i \ Ef ! r � 1 111 1 t I°II°11111+I11i° e al �'� � I Ja r ��♦ i IN♦ t.• �t E ! ,: .I e J ! S!NIIIII�I�I�I�Jiil'°I!ill°I°I ! 7i rW tz Hit,_� ♦ �' c 1 ,r t 4 le i c� �.I \ F y Ii1liLlllt'lil°i '.°I ,� V I rcw � 1 I ♦ 3 ( ;s � ... s S I� r � t j �11� 6° )rlFUEt E' _U �• ! I ! �. � i� 7J�GI ! bII s . I i Ei� i 'afTT. 2 �� �� �c I` �.• � I � tJ J '%� 'L13JL 3 (IP+JIIIp f� I� t �' �, �� CCj y< ' �I �j F L�L( \G l S I tm`-r ° ° )I �L4 ° >AY� VI zs I E • dNl(T �Int'1EiJl1, ?$I�III°ii � .,el mn.•e..� > .' + +°i'. 16 NAi i il,ll jft Illt 7 I� �Il����11ri� i +t S !I es1fi}et.� .B °.- +{i EeII f J lttli 'i it '' ,1 ey eS!g„ +I!!ir° a iI3F -ei e g Oj i< �+ r q1 InI rr + 1 S � I I F E 1 ,+ S ISGEIiIS II a SL <v� 1 . 57. . Ww mN vca yU)c CO) CZ en • Orrte�•/••., G (i„� O p w (� '°" M 'C ^ W � m � f� � ^� Q ai O n A Z � Up ad Asia Ad ? oA ryN OdAd O � > a8a r l > - "Ovx ao°- ch dd- ° WcU Mica N O o ma ° � a Z . c UC\ 3 du .O p � -ON C 1�1 W N � C ` R O h �•. H 4 C Q' Q, z d > 7 C avyj v1 cW docc- dog A V c ° nna c `u cm h r 1 Q G 49 o u y co dU `/ W ee �. •� A A N FA C A r a O n h c ° o ° Ec > ° EGy Q >+ y o a > z acoEU w 0 - E- U n " 1� WU ° t ' aM 0 0 A A U N c E 4eCa E .: G- ecak" �o ° a ycoay � �� uw WM d dv � r ddGr ? FFa 3 FF na I'1 CD u 42 CE CE c .£ a IL Di ! | • � � /\ � k � - � � $ 7 cc z § � k LL \ § ( \} !\\§ ;):\\ � LU � � � Ell § )E ( m § zf ° �q R! � w � \Go 9 E � ._ ; ; . °!! : z � m � 0 q` | $ § U. z aR9 ` , 1 . ] gg 2OU f } 5/ § G ! 2 ERR § ! \/ � ) § �#y k ) // r � qbi { \�_� ; � ( K7 7 § // § & q � 6a/ / \! � /# all 1 . & Eb ub�� § B Vii! % 0 2 h/g aj / } ! § �, o` �( U �^ 9 8 z aqrc s �ys alp a aad[@7 pdy5p cc `' 8.9 p ap Cmyg9 i s $y �.;E� O z° S yy#$j 55 pp g$ B ' EE as e'ggt d. if �AR 7$�Iy �2.- LL � 2c� eEi7 8 gxd gy N� w r � - p p6yga gQ _ wy� � is LLI Alcc is S gill!0 r yy y gE a � 8. S�-➢ Z 7q. 6�®! 5 IS 6 atF 6 5 W d 8 < S 9 9 pp ((pppp a q U 8 O° a gS s 5 U O 9 $ 8�'E c k piatl B � '$ zo a < .ffgm j$ 9 j7 � yem It v E Z 'a ° C8 O 5 " S. o tl G ¢ e agg qez � .�o Coc ° o 3 c m «O A a C t ° ] n U N y° a N c x m d C o a 'c « nN u v, `o `O " r v C E a C C • w y a p 6 h ~ Q 2 p O ¢ g c Q O wm Z¢w a m C A O E c x m Ec -°3 m` «No a d E '« m m a m t d m C E d " Q E f E ° .° mZ nc cu Qmo cU E� ¢ Uc m a d A C o Z E E a: mNq—N° 2=o m C oo y o o c 4> Y t O d AW O > m E " N m 2 E°d d m T L a I n « vdi L -E C°u u > « d ; m c c C ._. Z C a E I a o o« � ° C a mC vai o 3 a " m m « o h c 3 fn d c7 °mm mnm a cn ^' m_ N o Wyumxn oc O p 1 m fU x p°a R] O y O N 3m d v o am >,CV g ° oo m " a A n0 u ° t x V U �jj mq C N mama N Q Qvi A°� ae QN • W W W m 6 ] N O O q LL N O uU t V a m m ri U T c 'q 1] O O E > aui a 'm C N m E 3 m ° u $ o o C m a m m_ m° o ; m °n a` Hn CA C a A a m m L O - E d L w U N N d u o an d E m A u V 0 Z O Y «« co" to. N A m ow av « av 1O aui N « u° u au m c J2 a-2 ii > a 0a oS nt .N u p ° d d m m u ] o fi o N ° mod o '°^ um mA°a 2C a .2 ] o N U x E N V F N U 9 A N m C d O 6 d O z C« c E E z > c N i c °u "CF^ a m lac °u? `o'y ° d La U ` ']^ ° c .6 0 m p N E «° C a u v ° ; C m o w M N m c aO d N d ? N c HEM E m a n m d m E A o 0 o u Q o a E n u N u m m ._ o a H m > v m n °Y m a Lac ° m 3 c d C m° m M M , � A U; v 8 ° a D o C a E ] mm m m c Hm u yU n c mm°d _ m ._ vTy L O C c LL V � C m 3 ]._ .•E p O o a y s u o $ O •c m " Fmm E Om , g u m U A o° > > m C D m m N m « v°' Q ¢v C C �a m u c E m ii a m r v r' of v c E !^ sY pee w iwa S A' -0, >U I Y U C 9p .h wpPp U tlg Y�g141 gp IS A O 4 � 1 A+10 iy YY,6 TYVdY 0. N p N Y I Y W Pd 4yi �CgCM G Z C S I pNG� G M� Y Oq0 N0.RYP Y� N '•� I O Y e Ye O n+YI G �L q M .qi 4 YQ p � M I O�Lp W dN npgY "�C qY jI� y •-I I Yd w V 4..i1 .YjOyM 0 'J E C A 1 Y E Y L U 4 C 4'•1 C N Rp � 0. I Yy4 qCY Y6S NMY� N mC C3 G 4 Y W I POV y~ 'q0 CYU Y46W+1 OY �� rql ✓ ay■ P 1 RAY dHU YYq CYbMT YC Y•4 q O ryl W 4 QY1� S 1 5Y b � OF i9, YyN 9Y m q q NY 6UN Y N bNW n.-dIW OU G RW O • a I .0100 d .q U W Ys.04W q yp C 00 40AWW Y Yyp 8VU qmM 0 O'OL AJO4 d0 p•j +1 � �( � � 1 A g W U V (O� OGYYM q p11 � � Y 9 o i w C p n 0i i0�N k^9 'O Ub ppM�Y OA pN� C Y ry I• 1 MC &ow •N4M 0iG 0NyY4 > T C P W pT OOM0 � E00 00Mp d� Md •0> N 61 W T yA 4 Y I Y V M W 6 M 0 Y d A P 0 C p 10 L q d Y `N�yY 0 04 0 0 ¢d 'yW;, O A•n0 ksY. g0eY r1C 5 .1 Yn YLU 4 •J YY qM p u0 0 U Z `• �• I i Y"1N NYN Nutt Y � fC � s I YnS o i Y qN O CYtlYC o YYpY MYY4 ry LOM bOgW O n 0Wgu0 RwL r' 42D S W •• W i >Q Y9 a Fw0. c 4 u W O F W ��y�r ;`tltltltltl .� 1 O U C d O N.1 C py 060.0.0.0 0 G qn YC pV 040 C d 0 Y N G 9 4P YL. Vy � Yp epOep 0Y YoO U Yw UYy ~ 'Y P U Y O 9 y N Y 9 VM L'O U Y O4q MS ` 1 4 fi O poi M! 0Y 4YCM '!•.0i Sa ob0 OC,y TYNI 6y 000 6W 9w Try e G PUY 0 O.d191 ry LL W CO 4 OyA � o FN N.1t (0�10i Y mAAT OH U Ydq InW0. — — 00 C e 0 B �ƒ - § . { ! � � . ! . \\ � / ` . - . § 2 \ } } \ ! } \\} | 7 \ | | § G -j . . � ) § 2 § \ UJ . � 3r RG : — § 9I2 § � § \9J R f § § % ) � \ }//® | m m\ | . , � m5: ade 22\ ( ! E 2LLg DyR /w ' \§ ; ƒ » ! � � ) / �/ ■ ` ( / q ) ! GE S ^Q2 2zM | /\6: /! ! a ) �6 ` - "Q$ ) ) / § i §S/{ ®� k § \\ ( } %\)l ( $ [ LL B �� q ° | ) l � s it | L 10 z o_ Q ����� �� 7i� zgg� $ ■ � 5 U9Sx LL F- LU D g pia < a s5 CL LL 8 � 5o: fia 9a E14 �8.$5 • g pgp3c u. Q E ' Z I Eu M �. w. E y g y 30 cc V E c'- a �... T � Tii S z LLJ SoQ$a $ Z 3 0 0 0 LL V 0 yRs �0 ` ' i7y Wg y F.Ea2' S m F9`ad � `o Fcs < E� Y U a w E $ �' ca °°• 5 Saw AS9 '3 0 6 4 E 28L. yc9 am u 9 Q g q 9 R iE y{ z E ^ e5 z3°� °w0.o E xa °ro 15 i02 B n o f g fi a c o� E E o E �$ E Z, 6p gg T 5g g EE E�S � 29 94 u56 zo da'9 Cgd E ON � e QQ< .8 r' 6 E < ,7 .y z 8 JIB s3 ( ° <$Ct 9p <c• yYJ0 39 L^ qGq A "L Q t T T U XT CO V 0 i F {j C p yy P • • � S9 G - N m W ��.w.0 � � '� N � � W • • A • w Oa • � � UO � r , aa E E ^ J a J CY 009 N u � • W a �¢ � � � u� n Fiy A a F .: a w s. 1t/1 B � v >1 aw V L a l�T\� o a cn � W W a s o z o r`T�` c u O W O ea 1� Z l d � u Q V1 W O W � q W U u E or W � : A w w w v] 0. a m Ch 071 GI yyq u Ln V = W N M F--1 O o q O A ti o a r a r. 6� C N V1 7 M ca F a u ' \ V x E � v • a� aE E wl 116 - I I- � �li VIII f III 1 1111 LE 'i _ ♦rh\\\p\� yl� J7� i11111�1�i/lit thy' v I S I v/ /fir jt►�i�I�1����i i. • - �Iii�.dil.LIIIIIr, � - �- '.r ,,0,111-�J��Q�l�nC• - - ♦ ♦ ♦�Q�► OO ��IaI/mil-1 - ��� :: �'►11111 C\n - - ,�►i 111t V. '.1111 X11 �i�iLL�� G.- •� � �llli�7-. - �M.h�L 111 �►' n !� �. 2S1'«IP�► a�W tr ©y # MORA rill Hai r i Q 0 r, o U � U' Q W o- ) 4- WKk U s W gaff �Z o uc I U w � � Ez UWw � I Wu UW ► stir f , . .,r off NO _ j .. l� > j ��r,,� / ,,, i Hid li \ : i o U ^� � J / i4W Ilk ! ' l � a .„ Eli ' � a 1 t i I if 'mr s - 4 fl k 1 / e � R r EN o� F Am � u 8FFQsQ AY NpO�O 1/1 �j p�6 a � Q e- Ol Ug U ss � F �� oxF„ d a o;Ii 3 a a m., ° r l F ` � rA §RH 9 rA 2 z - « | 4 §/|§ � � o C F 2 '® % § � - A 2 ] v §§ § \ j} <' , e§ � �§ en ) $ s 2 « y § § | % out 2 )|( � § m e m Woi m e V o oml > e Ytl e q m 0 4GTY rvi � V COP im C P F n qTY A n e•I ry .1 9 q V rl W •� n C n A C tl T q O O G C • Mq VPPC NmmmmBmm NmB mmmm mm JGG149 nmPBmmmm NmB Bmmm mB AwgUtlC V • 4G Gq NPNnNImBm timm mmmm bm UYJ F nIN NOmmN Oma mmmm 0m Mo OH . IilbnsPfmNO NN BNNN Rm OCTGtl J �IgMiM NO'I N N'IN NON�•I bn dP• C Ntin N.-I ti 6G O O gUmB V w0 N nVMY4 TF qW YO 4Z Y ryNNmmmBmm •'Im Nm ONO mmm B mG YY T SW O NNNNOmmm mm 'e Tw•+ e SS 4 O WJGd• P OW O V BmmmnwmNN NnN mmmm b0 WMgwC M> a m mBmm 0m PO'I OY�1 SOB V BNNN MB B gZ�1J V�1O a l•Ix ry NO N�•1 bn d MA VY VM1NO C O •� — O CCO 2MxH Vm 4 } a aC9GO � V UW�O T ZMMMWWp44W MMW %N%% NN .l Z F G�1E mL Pq y<aY Y %N%yrv1N W'1.] %%r] `l.l.-1't •l rt F m F JATOAmV E J %NNmNmmbBB Nmm •'In.l•� •"•� O „ GO iY GVq WWWT � C BPbONP +N mm� F O MCM Gq WYFi] q rlN mOmON In B•y F 5 Oa PY a44a U rv1P 0b0NN .I.y 0N.-I m Z < ✓ VUF% O O � O a CVO mG yNF M N U V i•O N G~ Y9 Fa t TTtlq V�1 x pYVM Ci V> ✓ q w a.� q 0 2 _ p — mCUOAYG W Y C UCq n 00 � U q•Y r U m F >N 6 N C 6U iOnm�O G 4l •44GWPC W • Y•- VPG UPX GG GY OYO C Otim C�1 >o hl.�C Y A 4q U d T Wa—m�Mb V % Y6m q G > M— GV G6Y aMyC O�qC 06VOti M Y U OMM—Vp wC 0V N Y'1U 4 a C C T A O X M g V rl V M y V C'1 C W L•-I w C Y •W V Y > q Vqq .4GGY V mq COdn UW MwYYq >q S SG q•40JgPU Ztl96 Fww V F 'e e.qY q MVYY iH N9CY SPYV YOdC90.� Y T > > VNL •gY wOM 6CV6Y WM16 •FO 1 % q FqA >NY9 tmgW Fd ] AF S IO q tdh0 OMJgM VJ q MV Ulu IOU 44 0 i gVyVUF % Y p.yYV 6Y PM OYC O • O C V 6.1 y.� m 0'I % Y 9 'J C V H O C O 2000gVU 4.IU 2YOq E > CCw > YG YPViJYG C G O •�UUMY> tM.� Y OtiOgO OM9 GwY tl0�1 F I a<44VddNaO� gNNF UUVgN G%.] FWGMYCW 2 O Mml Om � gal BNBBn nmBd NmVi•1 N 00•I F 00N O U nyry TF I <2 4 VW O xom i ayW ud%9 Y IS-I N F I"I Y W W F rvl S % xt66 F UVFN V m C 0 N%F O }O y } O — U Fa 4 a G > u W O > m O U> V > YY N x O V V M F W F Y 0Y 4 nl 4 d T S U q JYU MYCC C F dqV y N T9MgP W G SnnCC �Yw 't OOmY✓ 6 M gCC> C OA000 O S aiVGV F T q q y 7 G F I s o m m r m m P m ~ ry 0 N YG TYN Nbl M 0 _ CG F 0 mgTV p a ry ry „ '� N O •d y'� mT O Oc PPCMq nP„g0000 bQgO 90 MCGU40 q gNpBO BOB9 00 Q4L GG O nN ngb0 n Btl00 00 N UJMtl F tlO.�OtlONP q BBbO AB NY qY • Y ONMNNnnO OGgJSM %.'�ry Nnry V•y Qn.�w n pPq m C Nwnw .� n w pC wOV YF YO S5 J NBbBBBOB BB00 BB AGY T SW C NANO BBBB BB 'n TN•1m SS S rJC6 OW O V OOn.,dBrvry ry BBOB BB wJQwC M> K O OOBO rv0 POn SOO O CNW ry Bn•�ti n bSJgU V p 1.1 V' C •y � C C O MS 4 � CYAV VG'GOQ T WWWWW4}W W %% A 3 F G.IgnO PA .]%.]B Ago .].] 6 4] O Jp YmYU %4pW J SN�'INgNNON N nn..n .�w O � F CQUOtmY Wu Y C i Bd n F G OY [w yQ C4CC 4nn Pn N 0 0 5 4 OOJP VFtl O O/In %F G W V U Gm }O _ O� F6 S TTm9 Y.qi W C > d V> O Ygwm q0 P Z + OCUOOMG W ON UCA FN p % C 6Y Sry P W 9.441 w PC u Y� C C UPY CG qM0 OI SBtl Q � NCA NV qY qT Y.� G W��Mtl 6 >.�Mm 6 M6m G > J. •y A uYNC b Y 9QYOw 0-0 :4. mPV WY •'IqP o W q PY MtiU Y� O ' Y C YC % YCG YGfI NCYY > q W_ Y9 GM9 U9 COW.1 UL YYq >9 0.0 • q P9q 5C Fww J F Y M Y i Q 0 1 0 J ] b G V 9•y 5 J T >NGYYgM a yq 6CU6Y WW6 C QFO q U tl } gMYOO O < FWOgF S JY S C SW 0.1uM 9 VJ q YV LYV ] Y qCU i G F p i OO K S•tiUV UW u m Y G KO 9 VY M' 0%4r�J%V V . -4-IU> UY r]% K O%Y 9.tl tl i FP u]Y GGYY YQ Y U C C 4VtlUVVM0q Z > GG. VQ OHOgO OJ 09, C Y S p 1 wp � OOH ti 1 ~il Y P "zoos tlBO� nB0% F NB b 1 ry 00 V PNN TF � 4z SS 4 V' W O M_} C CIO•IW V W00 3NtlFN } W F 2 ,,,���111111 •P'� C V OOO � S 4G4 V = C4SK S % m F VVFW Y O b }pNN } Y V N„ 4 0 • > V> W U ! YYY fWd 1 •v 4 6 T S 1 V MVCCC M 6A ry TAYQP W L ivbYY 4 Y qq COI GO F O O S K'l V V V F T q L 1 F i Yml i A m m NGTVC nGl m m CGP O SWA P F Ttl V n N 9AM.y d ry n b n C•� Y C Y T Y6 GG OYA NmmmBmB00mmmm mB 0mm BBBm 0m YCCA49 y Vm0000mmNm0 0B Nmm mBBB mm AwAU O NggNNmNmmNnNm mB 8000 WB wYYJYO F gBmnaNO m0 n0 0000 m0 NY Aw • wVbnmBmWbO N0 0nN 0Bm0 OC TG Ye M f10 YnlyfyNNPPOO 0qW N 6PtYZW C •� Ny n rin rl Nn .�ry N pC � •+ A Y m t YJY4 }F 4AV JO S2 M N0N000000000 00 0m00 mm AG AO T SW O b000000m mm m0B0 BB wTw•-la SS 4 O Y'ML dVP VW O V 00mmnnNVBNNNB Bn nn0 0000 B0 .�M twC M7 C 0nn 0 0 mmBO nB PO.4 OYw SOB Y 000 B B AZNMUN9 p�•IW N B N 0nti•� n 6 MA Y4 2MWF � } � PC9GYpY W F2 V 4 YOCUp PA VO�O T WWWWMWW}y}}}y 4} WWW NNNN yN �i 2 F GwAA y20G V�NNyyrvi y.-I' UrvIUUV't WV NNN .i.i..l.] .].] 4 W O YY mVY SCW } F = F OTYOAW % MS•'Im m0uBN0•-IN NryrI N0 N00 •I.+'I rl .�.+ O GOyY L 6 WWWY G20PPbNbbO nl ti0 N0 F O Y Gt WWFrvI AON00 V•'INmO q F Oa PM %G4% ]KrvaPNn.�•-IN 0 n rvyq m Z t J NNF S ^ y V G GW F% W �M— TTa9 Y•-I MN S 9 !- W4YM C ] U> V >m NY 9 YWN O�IAO 2 Y d•I 'Y C Y — C V O A Y W �( YYX UC9n rI NA� �N Ut41 P Y V !•"I w ] F >N m .-I. AY dU ZON—m P — 0 >'I P 9.-I•CGV PC Wt 4�'Y A A^I 0 0 AY C GP UPY CG CY AMO C y S mb C4NNNbdC ] wCP C« MV Aa T //ryYY��� VK�—B✓b O C F dNC 7N w y gYpe \ \ yi G 7 Y-9MnAN ] A6N CY WNCA 9 ! 01 4 6GCWTOYA—A WZ Y UA NY .IC WG•-I �I <Y A dYOAA a0 SS W•4 OEW COW'„ VL MwY 9 >9 S S t t 01•'I.O A U' Y Y y P O 2 C 9 W F�I M M F w W W tl Y A I Ntl M i dOPtl wm MAG9 ZPYV ZNtl Y > 6G99'I MI } > >M G OYKCM `1 .iAC •( V6Y WW C 8F A ZMU I O U Y V 9 4WW OOtiWgC CYW YG VY i ri 4V AGY S V y Y a w U C W :.. U � t M C 9 O O <VVOVU V•'1•'1tOMM0 4O Z40A 2 > CCti TYC YPYtYYC CI C O V V Y�1 Y M V Y Y J M 6 Y.4'I O ti O W O O Y A C ti tl ti a O ti F 1 CiCIU%WWCYGF6yp y0r1yNW VVV•-ly Oyr] FMGYYCY' OI N VI 1 Oml X21 P ! • W � I 1 j N0B0NI 1 NBOIn I 1 NObBI 1 a00 F 0b0n 1 1 O U iYry n n y I SW O NcSt O 2002 2 W 2 M W F } W F Z �I •q+ d mO O C T• %S6W V2 . m4A S y UUEW Y W B F NF c O E6 _ 2 ! V Up O > 4Y O ~ V 8 V4T nl CCG F N AU•+ � c 4 Ag000 F S 2'l V U U F } m L 1 F I m P P PPpm o m m e e m m m B 0 q B N 4GTY Pi N¢ i c m sACaP P F qTV Y ry r m P „1 m m g G V T Y Y9 tlPPC 08088000 B00B 00008 0B VCCYMO 00080088 0000 00000 B0 9.Iq VUG V • MC Gq 00000080 p0B00 00800 B0 F 8000000b 4BmP NOBS B0 XYVgr - 000NyNlP OBnVP rv0N0 BN OGTGu Y R AMiY dN my rv.a nNr 6Pfi C fIN W r m 6C O p r y muse Y t uro w F uYtl }F C 5 YqV MOB <2 6 B00BBNBB 00000 80000 00 qC T iW R 00000NN RBNNN 00 00 wTrrp SS W JG 6uP OW p V 2BB0NN•�n.1 .-In.+ rrr00 B0 YVrMfiwC M> ¢ 40N0 Fm 00 00 POfI OYn 5000 WHrr N IV0 ON 0 girt Rm W 6 WmN C S ^ ^I SMNSQ W } .] oCOYY] V 1 W F4 ���111 Y b u 4 OCUaPA 1 �Oppy T pMYM}YWWW F}YWY YYYyN wN rl 5 F 00ge 1 502 {^0i4]II J ydrli UVNiN UNiN yNr1A`t •]..t 6 O MM OOY 1 <R< 4 F 0 F ATYggp 1 F J W0B000000 W00rv0 rvBBrr •'I + O M U I WWy Fb O BrvNry mB0 F G OkolOCfi 6F O <rr N b SBOm„ NmM F S 0o V V4<rt rvl rOPm OrN - N i C V J = 0 V O W 5 N O R YGUO qa „ U O _r CO „C Y F '1 „ TY9 V•�n T •] W 4M� > d V� E = Z F WCVOAMG q W U Yr 9 F Cr - C VgrVG ] O 1 Or F >M r NH q nY q O OO A WY O4CaVP0 0 F VY i Vq Gu qM C T ry Jay C p Y¢ u P•IP iy g6gY6Y O > . 0 C R Y E • O r 4 Y U ] UyM V-� O JMY <Vgr4r W�q YPY V'1U u O 4 - 4 % C ¢ C 6CY yVC w P rCYb Yu > V q 0 GW VY M EY yCr PC YwgYq>Q O S wJ F OIMr ¢ •M ■ Otl FGr •Ibr b q q R O.1 Oq O O 0 U4UM i-1M C 0•JpG o<r IC M T •'I OYq >OS M >OX m > M CYq F q -6 Y ] Cq Y Fbq mq<wV2 FY q00 S O AI VMYa9 MCYaq Y A F > V qGV q WHYM V '•� w•� i W V � G PM !MC .1 M ¢ MOV ]•i yy 2V aY F_ y6Vy Nwr ] C H q O C ] 2raGMrU SyVYO VYOgY Pr Gr 1OPOYYC O qOr F I FSrlV NW4Ud GSUN ¢6FFFF VWN FVaMYCV i O I rvd1 we . oe � PR 9 Y B00B0 000001 P 61 F mBN O U ry m! m N y y I }F 4 4i y SW R SS W F� SOBp Rm V W_mN F uR Q T '. WFF6 ,I •P1 R C N000 4 0 R<4.i S N q -Y F I VVFnI MOB N I yyS FY O TO Y F FR ¢ U> F G AMMY W i W OmYY F '. r W u 4 SMwT U CEJU CC w0A N m N G m ]ti r] CAY q ] YMOO O $ HF¢UV F T A 9 • BBBB ub � 0 B 0 V Y I Onr B Y9 C 1 0 YG TYti i Nzi qu e e _ ;pP F B 0 a Tu • W P M m N 0 �.ai Y O G C I 1 BB B YCCgYy I ~ 00 B n qV I O 0 tlYYYYq F B % V qw 0 O C TL Y Bra m dPaY C YY O NN ne • Y 9YY Y gEYYO UNN U nB 0 quNY9wC Y SO4 Y B 0 AZNYU9 iV ti 6 Vq YY VdN = YAU IZa F,< N V 4 V090G Pq Y4Z Y 00 M O 5 E CyYOGVq WdK Q ON F F O ow .1 NVF q p u 6 OCV �.OPinp VNA OM N V' tlN CuY T04 OTTaV U.94 EMV 4Y JY Go U> aCUOaYi ry W ..Cj N Uw� VU Ptl d VV a4p C V M w U j 6 A Y 6 n L U y V u G_ 4 N•'I 'r C Y Y u U 9 d Y� aiV Co i0 YpdG Y9p Y m q 44 . Fm m YFY N S i Q U 4 -0U OqV 9yV q p PY Y C Y O .Y NV PY C C L 49.0.0 OA F r ANY VA FuppYCU 2 O � 00 ' Y V Nai v°'u �c Y Y0P YY Y 0 q tl Go Y > o J0� 1 P Np� LO F N0r0I PYr Y9r O rYnBi yn V n N Ynq TF r NMr Nn 4Z 6 9N0 Pq Z NV V' WM N SO4 NO UYN a yN > 60 �M2 N P Y Yc V 9r^ V 0.4a � rv_ 4 Mrv0 .. 9. 0 4 N OrvY vB 24F tlN N tl .. U VV V Dq wn T06 FCU O > Y O VNN p� 0 YY G 6 frZl F Nd 4_ qY V CYT 6'0 6mY M q qN • W UN Y .t Y y V �Y 4 ANq Ydq COO O _ .0Y0 4V C C V N OdM YON T NONN A Y dN 6— Y q V 0 4 O F i 4N ry L/1 b d g .. d •; ona d c v F o d Q ^ t yv d E w 94Z gn dv � zE Q c ~ qW wd uo(j F ` c WLn -` E : c`o Eve a ro 0, M G L r ICI O > a o a Q NO O O 0 � .+ �U �O+ •° • N •O W O. �I UW o COO N R d G dU w A A y .b s nj f-0 p• 4. o`n - d 9 E o d C a� R8 > °- c Q co H •3 oaf u Q u UEv ca .4C7 Gco A c M Ca N . . Ln Zoa o ° U � � E 0 av o cc w UM r4 dM en Z F�1 F h C -et V _ E� E � qa dF U d z UO > e°� - ` °w o �` a �• d R N A N Oi E h�l W 7 r ti c� v ,.y d = n• 7 v, a � p, o �••,�,V -z co PQ V aa I` N G C� F Y °• /T^� m� �w r-I a or J m•• r ;;z �? F Z z m ° cU � t� �i U� O ate- e0.�• Q s<z 26U o �z Fz o 5 � w Q3 � W a =Z �� I „ � � e� � 0.a1 � ai ��� . .~ • � UW E E FOP All U / D r • .{ pm y ...---III CC a aq sG �qq■u �^�qq d ���Y�CC�MY�+1 .1 sit pyy pl�OH pPa Yp U�p ^1��O9yotl ya: O�n � 9 uE M� 9am0 MRt YNO 0.7�{lgppa�j.1 aN Yy �d g0 �� � O Ym Oe� gOO�a qC aa� .�1� •� p�y9> 9® 0 p H a�q 0 '✓ ap 2 gg ttZZff O00Sp yy qq$$ � �Y U YY d EY iCOggqyOqqqy pp� W> Z ~ 9 � U� C mA Y'y M�ymy Hy �iC �gY+Y1 Q�C9m F pjy UN �PA 71 9 �pYy PdEda 9" YpgiPyl � Y {U� i aF ayyYy4^my �y�gfy° � y�py ON�yyd �Y �M+6g149 mMMgyap9 0 9y ,° 9yNM �F 9CC M++OI1�WW ^Y��y 9pp p■ AU' NM.IV C�� C q A•t O qY m H UOAH pO.di N 0 6�qy+1"O�m�M MG ...�i�Npp� yy aajg SQJan q 11yy �1 Cp ebp CC•00 U YqY �'� aC 4L Ly ✓yp,y Yp �g� NNZ � UO �yA �� epONp�•YIMMMp CM UPCq OUiq PM L.� �j YOep P vaq ^~ qION d]E YUd tlq N V o N q ..G{��Pppy q .�a W d {I�p.qm GC PtlfIA^ A H p4Q pd� Pq u� 9q 0d 8o0 hj O.Pi Y1 m Mq Py 9 �M yyd r > apPap qy°� .ppI Mq Y Y�Y Opq Yq.9I Um AWVii 4�tiNM�S U' N im �iG O�.i�EI OOP �JS9 q� H� op hipaz YO Y✓ a p 11 �aQ � � �� old d m « o o e � 2 d �o � L qq✓ _pCY'� HY CHP jVi 8 ✓Y4 � 9UUq � P9q�C pm � q y �� e yA I M Y ��g HO��� � q ?g tl�N dY qE � W A mYX $ t�✓ ya wy�.a¢� d '� ��Md 1�� pyW�.Oj ✓fA�pK i•qi � WU & 9 � �� i o0 L {� dOu�qMp0�ti W d ✓ mH o N ppn"� t w K+, .q°..Y v d88 ail 9 yYPY 9 MAW aqi W s�m9 M^...111 SO �oC! o rgiy q q d iiACC� q� ill 0i mK K HU YC f� FU41 �i�U m�� �N 3�n m 0 o ti N y Z O F gg o d zw a� $�g °uci � 5�n H �J ° e� �rg�g� ��� � '� �c '� � � o pie �•�a .. v 9 ��1ff �e7 y� �_ r 8 � � � 6q5� b S �� � 8; bey i• � � � n� �� ��} �� ��� pg � � � l °� � 8a �� c� � < ��� � ��� �� �� � � � � � � � � F � � ��� � ��� �� n �� • � .... � - .. ..�. ,. N , y i � �, M � � a y _ � °+ y:a 1 ® • ° iZ3a � � �- r <��� .. �a 'a .. ^. � ��� I '� *� � • 4����� � .rte- _ 's :• 5� - -. ih O o � ���® ��� V ^ � ; tai ' ® a � � � a rZ � � ., y t � f t ` i a a v Y dd9d �• •� + •� o Y• � � r� � i �. p cam, 1 I � + + � r i� w G i e S• ®• ie � � F � y5 TY 0 +1aAP - JN Y� Zym M uJ°�IY� 9 'O Q 0 OPn ° S yyJ��Y &� V .•Nj'•I EBE�■ ONM �d � pO > &V 0 yy q L $ •y .pTj N q 0 Y 9Y�m 9Np� ° �E r'4j NNN4 4 U' ^m YU N OCyq Lq�p Z y S Y YYO qq ° y yY •.•eJ y p aZ O 5„yU &gXy9 Y5 � CSq Q°. tlEY yNVgyby uO. 8 n wp55a° a0VOC °� p8 N 5 m 9 ; Zm Fa j a N Uoq J ub y q 6 0'YC I((9 w O uy e°V�i wYq° y a Y.0 1 uyTm8r � 5 �°Y+ ❑"Y. y,9 Gi ❑ a rM. k-. g �y S q 5 H qS Bpp yd�.O1 y LtlNM d �� U4a' O � 0. y m✓ ..>I VS�pY✓0 d.VYj O jig .1� 1YY1M.ppi pa ° Y■S qOqS Yp Yp' OVCppZa8G ✓y Y> M SSd ..il�p� U g a q V'� C 5.W A u G q o q 5 y Z y J .,y ° 'tlN 59pp T 9�dtltl S L g N Ctl •yMbgnOV�w aa M G 9 Fyy 3 y Fy�o•,Y>°„✓Ay N Sq Y y y4 OM1 p N 5 N 5 M�O m 99O 9$5 a Ova V,rv! 09 a4-0 ;N �oyU . cp Oa 009 pp5c ~N p A ~.�N1 M YYY°pGY�°Mmy�yO Y°f I w U�d..Y•ri�S+✓✓O p I C•.■N S NA V '!�a Y'l°NNN � U L AS [®!m�[/4. „OUb1✓5 N P KS{A�.p N 9NyY kU a5 N Nd�>Y M y y O N 1-u '0 U°H r -m-v q L MCa81N O OaAG $.9 n .0 Sa G y•JU a� A FM"NM U p0 �?QSp W Z v,Y 0 y g ak p q p Y�a yyyY�5a>0 e ✓Oq� ry° YN p LYY°0 d C a N 9U Y�'J• a0LrOQj YYaGAp ba AN A .�U l'”I YN dN p C b OY 9 N LdS V 0�N C.Y 04 , 010.JSr m Yqy C u 0 On by0 &4YA y•L 9✓p Uy-y 0 0, G yN 0 qY 0 w5 a p p Vy ■ Y'i j.a . o tt > 4 m Y C V F yyyS > d 9 0 .,°j aVA N b 0 & .°ia L0yA✓ A U N O .°iaY % A W 4 0 Sq W Yp Y 0 N Cq pa 0 > NYNN y NYN4 dd C TZ d y t°t�..pOj P5 5 >y, .ymMY p°p u d ° �Y•'IO N e e e 5q ✓ eau ° 0 Y N . L Y; y 5 V m� M YYJ NLpm✓✓•NIV ) Yuy YYY gMy qU > AC 5N p •� QA d m0C m' V b p05n M Y C pp S GG 1•�Cp q .°HO +CO ✓ Oy Y yy O a4 U ON .•yY OY N✓Ltl J0 M Yab P d 0Y 5 � SU O Y >, S .•1 MjyLpG Npy v d�qA YqN YA Eb N N N -4 BO SN N >p Y Vl y 'SL U YO$ iY �N �F ryN�p �•� qG gk °y� L yY.bil ba 9 tl5 Y yVW ■ p gNM✓A.NIq NYq ■✓ 'ibOS �•YNq N p 0 Y5.1 MV Y N Y YtlN 'AL gOYO ° Y Y N M�� a qq N✓a✓ Wq 9m5 I 5 5 Boo Ijjwugmz $ yYC 3v ;yppqq wqpq mqq,QQ98� d� Jaw •Q Yw qy N ry y 4A AN ° dC J.N 08 ' � N 10✓ UY Nq Y-� Y m TTV jC q✓ A N YU �1 M y y >,.p 4 {A�'O>~ p A m N Mq N {9� `1~�� 0 u > O 5 4A. 6YS S lyy�J� Y q Nrgd ••TTTT�y�y�•�yyjjjjVd p yN"� aO0OYYy Yp �dSO yGI NUUG �qCA �VO>L�.pS&q pyY� ANy Wn°N�0m3Np b10 9✓ p° = Ay mNU y Mp -O }SIyY 5 O 4 MO ■ N 1 YN�WYgN YYgF� ghHr1� A y OU o a _ .Nyyi c .ym y dN co YaoS a $.d,SY m _NNN yuyqq �j�j�p � . ca Zi MY m5 "� •a5 YV FjNb NU SM^MC .ii 0 p °aNUM LP yYN N 0 b a rl N Y 4 N N rI V O dY a,N AY N A N MU MP bT .� # G g0 � p � g� 64 d iC „� � V �N �y3gN y^ y � ..� 5 ••�yN $W m UsS rjO rj >�n N UNN YMpq Yip CN USN p^ N S �yN A a✓ �'� �Vjj FM✓ P bd 3S +YI gNp,x� p° Y.°M a 'pJ 5 GA �NYbN U � GG M .1 O� Fp CP 04�C G � U ,�pd �+I MY SCMm P U .1•M AM OpPN Y YY H y ..I NFJG 9S LNN r�m�yoe�OU GM Y y � y ppy YYY Y N Yys tl N uYYOp S F p pM M 0 0 0 V � 9 M N ,OR A yp AQU U Z p d.Ni as i S! q I q w� N U H Y • u o• � m , a H P N nW w0. 0 yn Y .YI H all YYYYO 9L N >. 1 "0 Y yyp L°.ywH�`1' � M W M €55��33 OF••1w 8R; a8� , � CCmq. wto HS V Hu o H pO 0 w CCw . .-• N M t� N ,O h O] W O � ti ti ^ ti � ti � � N N N N N N N N MY .I .B 2 S•.Olq 5 PL O.q GY M��OgOq YO O.O I y i S�QO qZ YY CUd S YU .OIY pd U U G1U qd mo vOw aN OC qN NG.1 Vy pyY �q•O.Gb$.N.; YCa0 q 9 V0 S A V ydq OCM IaN.yYQY C �NLy,ap q U>,,•,pW� NGd� A88yY C SPL ~rT 0 E h C q' > {Y22{;0 j� Ou�H N N p N Y 9 YO N A ., Y5 9N�S TOrH�� Y •�.� � Y Pw > 0Zp VN YC M„ YCN .�j O� '., O dqqd� Yip Y Y 'y1�� q H tl w ^p5p55p��aO H Y y y 0 U H PF q O M Y y qq 22C OyC 2� yyY >o a . N Y p�� Ty� G y ;U �� tlV.Pi U � tl.01 ddU � +IU ny YwOM y AYE• MOQ a+1 ,� dN Cp9� C n p�• y N >N.. Z OVW y®yQl�'�•Q�^j,Oh Il��� GYOOY;i�N d]' w9V wUCCC�qYY Y N d AYOuYO-Y�,O ti•.gl '�Y p pDpUN MYa•�.Y L�pA y y H°N 5O�0YV NU C M N w Y L Y N Y A V 0 V MO Y 0 0 A a L L .. •ww yO1 d'✓Y J. YHYMS YG-N 0dT�. 1YNW Oy0 y t•?O q H V O Y a W. M V H 0 yy6•J O pryryn � YN•.YI y. dY Aqh YY M� qn 1 0 as .Nyiug >o imN.Yi d� 9uU.Yi � o °' # v '" �t tl Y �Cyi YO M Y °U' ti C M HM d yy SNh OWN N O� Y WMA_O GM nyy•0 dOvy Oqy YO 6V 00CY .Yi '0 ON a Tw UdQI �~ OOY;q 0 YO 0q�: y GY iiCIIY 9U •. .>IS Yy p LUG OYVO C spy Qd ,,� Y.,1• U P Y� 0, Y qNq g�gppO'O VMNy ���pdp UdytiN PpOp.�N� y�y Byy�j Pin YYYUb N V. v pYI;;L Yti N.Mi AOiV Y.�N� YU Y vm. YFUi a MAN Yd�N '0, Y� n UnC � Q ry Yp�� dd Ydv KF�� tl L U O d w P G w N Y.-I >nl Sw • 7a ,. M p � fi, S t4 5 � t d�/ty • �Sd� TI� � a � v V A Y P i 4 kill P L i 4 Flt « � t 1 1 A �+ .�<. s c o y r i qC o I nb 6m J t A S R �a " g p n E° a , [Y � 1%. T IS , c- E A 6 r+2: s a E # as U q N .k uUd IMI 9 It It a E m ^'W 4 f Uo � 3a o � Mph a Al sM1 a • :i .,1 { ,�v3 r u c r 9 Z• � s � .gH � µ� >a 1 rp� Y RKr v' u a. G n R. £ � `�• 1 y le!°i • 7.J.S. V�yt L ' t �^::ij. /' �.i..�.,� =F . ;' .�.. art � '} � •- � ,� ' �a�[->. i •'s+ r AIL �R A � J r fi � 3` s •': i Y w lh ..y. ^� � i.q , •1 r ! � • t G � g p A i � Y� d Y J •• � s sY• ��f 8 iWK ' t 6 '�•s r k j' 4t !! s �arq Sinn rf LL f 2111,°` Y r � I it ` •° � � �- � !f SA Y /y • � T � . p y s y ° �' y y' :.Y . I Ott. q °� •z". yam,,! � .x r -� tt("e�/xE'� 4`-' {� ,� a 8 ' r, •1 1 j ��4 y A'. T r �+ e � da�eF •� � t1 p �` '�r / r �• .�� ,tr4 f j�'1 ,�.w ,A ,fit Si ��1• �� � y u ;; �i t eS yy w � 1 ih ' /r i IN L •. Vic.,... �•i � t �Xt ' .6 ? a • r r � as ! a tr,y.T' • �� ,`{' ��al�� 17 1� �� w N N M �1 V�A l 511 � k rR dC L tr,� q c u n n t c h" ,�Av 04; AE"f7kY i C u Lu fl l X16. �6+ �4 �• ' 3 W N z -, OA � N o R en3 W Zcc ti oz b � �9y U Q � V A° � � •`°° �C7 E CP c0 ° a y b cz ^^ UW .°a a w 4 h� ° ° b H � � CL R N 141, � F G —y 0 k d kw U g04 Fa W y d Ufl C �1 "Or. O " z o E x o = h Aw a d cc* Za wF x o ycno Wz o x o U o $ tiA O C cn a 0-4 A x U CL a d o o _ > rA > Ln I o W U a v)U0 V Q w sis 4 4 N M 4 h m a9 R + a @ Eli 401: 4t. E'° U-111 s EE �n p [j] , a �FWJ' yayy��-jy ;35DEmEe�e� LLin°u_a3 3i°d- 03 $5 sbi°:�85. 538 38E i� W Ti $plj get niq E9 SC °Y�y. 55✓✓ e a h�n$QO?�aI Ecr O •� � m2 EggX as �y33_ n+�c Ec °g E=.Cu g5 la, •�!�II � m��g �C5�9e Sg°_x�ba2F Sy ��u�8ga$�.=x jO�$ 'J •'�j 4E- cEy :.P SO`$E � � o=�aY S�t 3";:,-$;�c'c8a$ 1S*1.9=6 <Y ESE '40 4t X x Tv % % % % X % % % X X % X mE 2 y 4 e X x x x x E x X g �# a rw e 8 i c y � s a a i ! II 4 arnaRV CM'1F191M i ��;���-•�`% '.''f 1 j, lit li I , � �� ; , �� �� of lit I < j I � it II 1 I } r i Z I ❑ i M i �/i\\ ��� RAO �► �� — i ll�NnyQy•�'�' r�••4y�� � ��� . iJE{3 WOR • mo-rn, r _ ! ® ƒ \ ! » �4 � ; ! • - A # % - . . _ �It |I d | ! !| §] §§ | § | ■ a � § � rfn 27 PH I:25 No y C:Qf : 'd tp 8 Y P a sm ° D g� � � m W � � b •� g �gt{ � <qp N � 0 3 it 9 d O e E CJ 9 w4s �$ 4 s 9 N JC O I� q F 9 rvB p O® !R = 21 •~u• %I % 5 u a � ga a• z ~ 4 1 e. e< < u E Ga YE ayy = a5N GxG E ya 9 � ooE ; D1 Fr • a xa E - vy'o V ry 141 0� x0., E N a � C U e ' om wiy5 c 'n o �\lvox•:�. : oo ° U cS m n� 5 �$ Ea `m yry `� Soy ? � N of S �c� tw 111\I\ y N \ O Q 10 • � - � -fir yQ �1 b ��...�� �#j✓o�`",,� . • � 'T.�4y1i��,�"Y p ,'z�h9 yyY Ti r a ^ v • - � ) ) � km ; ,_\ } \ - / ( . ld \\\ �LLI� / �k\ -JO q\ \ � . / • { � � q ` . . � . | | . � At � - / $ / ` % ?; [§ % | �� b | I § \ � j k qƒ , | ' J\ � 2)\ ) } \\ \ § \ k§\ - � j■ / / | | ^ | � � \ «§ � \ } }\ \ $ e , 1 0 tlyp Y A O Mtl .Od 06 W SOOLY •9LN NM g o Q4'..« g ti,•c,« Aq wv u 6 fp. 8A A_ Y qA« P A � UP OBnSA tl� tlq 4C M 11« tl'UY y00"> pP G , � PC C C q '•� O TY i CMAO q 4 10 y 4GYC Ae « 0 ,J b d Y 0>� 'cJ C q U U 00 '° E o O� M mOm CYCAO $0'P C ", 1 yi Ey ptl.., Y pU C M P W 0 ..V- 14Y 40 y 4TH P 0 M pV 9 U d Y 0 %b M 9 .Ci p f C1 w y yO L iL A< YAA V pYARp YYm Y WW - fzf. N N % SOUYN LddB6 « '> M Od M m%�R%V V>, Y 40 UU4 O p Tm dAd HA0S r \Y «N "U NAOV- Ou , 0 M.•Ni M y M «» Y CL Ca U (Ja a�p,W 99 0V •`0 Y Ld>NAL g 4pAW 0 O O Ay i�M '0. O G` m � .qi PCaC O T nN tlPN C 0 MNU OG N LP b n BAn i0 % 'tl P�p , Y >« OU >PL 4W OM 02 w O IA I ai§i PfN- •• M Y« U M U M m P qWA d" 0 A N %O C A U] 0 L 0m4 PN c O 0 00 N 0« O Y CNO 1'+ M L�F L•. O LLUYw A A WY O N N Y qq N O+1 �M O U Y E i SSWN N O OWW 10., 4-I i 0 0 Sid O IN U - . 1 _ IT S-.o r 1 I i 1 ' • r 0 ••s ; z��li ' �� � o : i�9s•� z 6 _ 1 I..LI :Y- sf W m W ilk ;� ' { 1 � •. O OLOYYYOPU MM Cg90 iMY9 qpc 9 V� Q$ Ili B..Pi M� NiUYP -.0-0 600 e YY0 MyRti laq AC0y000 8 ,y0 atdmdc9 eq Q O i d R F Y u 6 U 'OJ Y Y 9 U Y ..Ci U 0 1 10 WIVgo '054,O tl \ N YO d.V10iGN0 a0 HHa 0 La WY NImHL' dY w. Vw V , Y Y YYYi W , O 0 A m N N ALH6 V .p piC A09b ..mi U N MH q a.''�jY � M •�dgg•� M UyY YL N yL 0 m Z a..VINp� H0'CG 0 W 4u LAM G d F N w 9Lm Y ayq 0 , 0 , 09 >Z P GRp YC Y 0 AO'� AML , Yq NYYd 'Jy Pti W. O U. W Z 4gLYWw m✓ W H , , yAy. tiH A YAimgLF Y MLe^ Yq WZ W £ 0 4 Y Pl n M., T..�..1 b Y O Y 4 0 O 410 W T u L P W dUH•.�C p YOiC Oy Y• 0 W N d ppY d 0Y ,GYY Frmi .✓ PC p M � YYdpW CyyVAM yOTC Y.ttVi CO 9C V T Npo1„ YHa00 .e� q OM u 0 . .i 4 L 4l F £ G.O H 6� G 9 ♦. . q b-2 H 0 w� gdp„PjYWY YYdm TA > U 09 Y.I , C , d OUIOd.-I 20 , bGti9¢O�', pH Y000m qM Sr10NgCYQPO OGdPgGYO Yy HT4 tim CH 04 GUYT �j W ,��•• g q'IHtl +IU YO M'O Y Y � ht ..I JlOYHYPYMM Htl i Y F OI gYeYOL 00:1040.�C• yy YO 4 .H OY06Y 0•M qd F� OOY�JS dM N p WOYWNU4Li g � 32 H 0 LL w C CC N pp M2 yp0 m� Y YP `\n 1m� Y b O RO'09YY WV 6V N •,V HN �.4 p9 bM UyFyO Qm 9 a ry U TY yH O GagYY�p UO YMq Y J> O8> yyy0�j NW UCOICAMP CY M C W q 0y0` .0 V. 4q gH WNC w 0 fl W papa d HFyLyW YYYYDa Uq9 f1 N.1 5 O0Uyq CmG YM y0 r913 yf, o vo .HirvYW yy 4 q W O� OYY OU,w pG0w qqqq0 0.•� UC M.15HY HN gmyCU N '� V U £ 9Y9 uY O Y MHp m+lq 'mCC C $ H 0 9Hpp UMq tiLp CFC�i OY•YJOU Z U 0pp {O�HH•YiM Y �N iO>� mjC~m q Cmw.miY Y 0 -V 0 b W .Y OOTY. i9y UC pp HA 9 0 00 H yY �L" o U qH O "Z HYtl ,� T "0 q OS a Z g H Y o .. YU 0.qMO 0M 0W+ N, C yC yppp 4'pp n m n JJ d d P u YM^ILd q Y 0000M UMO W e Z �C.. WP oY�se 9 YH ngMOpq Y.I�OU4Yb Z � P H p.� H HW StiAM OY q e O 4 yy ~ n H yMY04 Y.MVO G.e 1 we 9 �gOG0tl o0 YTP L0."eH0 w w Y M tl 6.OM YO v 0 moo. m 6 Y Y N0 H m 4 Y 0 S 0 tl .b 'Y. Y V Y e a ❑❑ mry Y %%% LC. aYT Y W •� 6 q6H Cq Ob0UY0 W Yql U �' Q H PYMOe A .I PO OggY O NWCY mq ON pZO y •• a $ R OC pUnN WW YY LYH Y9YY0 GGO % 0 Y.�M..11CC MH0 M LiH 4 U E C O FH6 HgYgH FYdMNmROM Hon N KK%W Y U 4 f' 9 . P C OR 1p :Q m L ts k 0 W O R 7 ` « ° '.q g iii v c-° om `0 vFm � W �� gyvy++aOa O. c m =s.a2 O ICjGl'� m CL CO a hgwW �� 2 a = ° yo Soidu o t nE • t-, m e =S 8 °i E m E -..7Y{{� E ° E b E > E a m a U W E 3 n W .� c f b m m p$0W «Wc 20 b J° 'm m 9 z v$ E$ y c E q Uh C IL c o cS3 � L m o. K .Sag$ cm E N m b .G s a E `o S m p W O W U) bE:S mktm E z8� �y $a� opx m0 � Sm ��nn Eowoh >mn N .p SzN � p`mc W O N °1E ° wwgg � nEttcr6� $iN bb o 3tbdmvQe m� g cO nBn6cg'S Haan ` 8m°m8 3 WS M'p NWO m� Em W Oq�V Um m t 8 w£ EO � �v ' . & EEO '�£ o 4 ; :gym W mop P c Enb Safi mgg aU2 aSEa� w a P.tl P E E E Z W m �gc �F S ° gin �E � �� �oW » c i � cs v .E¢ m c£i� m LL L o m= 5$'=2 'tii EE yr'Od �Y'�5•- W +`yr m � m � C7 "' °a• g'g � Sd c e �nry � � E nn 9 c �m� m $ ;ZeBrn �mE ^ on.4 03 .nrnEa ym 5 m ypn fi $ c •7 �b f w we°mE � g LLe� y, 1lCCeia� C O O $ LL m 2 8 c a n o a m`o W �•4 mg E m '62 «A a t c m o gfr� n a a & x1= E8 � a �$ g eve nb8' '; qty Fd � Em O1cn w�a � m ° p 'ca ° Tmjd� E�� Tmmim E3� �8m -_6c A g � ym-• m c E E CY ZD • NvE NEE �vV �N =� m3 $'- n Jo5> m Q .FS n EE m mt@ m T rn m �g� v Z mmmz'-yN m3tvc Timm � S .�. m a; N o c 'E m N 5 .: o m £ o c cv aF b •�l c Q y i�in No� iE � m��xax NZ•y w 3 a U m vm '-^ NEm c .cm. $ L °' n c E q mm Amy +r Emm O LL avn p'm c� ac; d EP IA Nm W Y dY� C R °pL 8� N c15 $' tL 32 tn K o SEZLV ; Jr UEma3o acv oc o J d R N > d O r O c O zo f i & y m � c y m T@ J c m �'m m c cTi •• ; S T m � Y yy y Gg N O O `Y E m o S o°q 30: ; ry o$ m � n 3 ° t� 8i _�i n o N O N CQ�6 L N J `. V E m c E m m v n t •` 5 @F9aa Y E y v C N m E o 2 ` A « 2'a � vm $ 71 m Ol 3 € ° z'. E m � em m L nmL $ m .S ° E o J i.m m 3 m Ng' ESg - E G o = m E • 7 EE## d� o pu.20vm .•`°- 3 d m $ 10 m o d n A u u h L m N D• 6� N L'O L m A W • � YY ¢ a • AC 5� 2 �W Y � ` ow C psyu ;i - O W W YL •9� Y V.y - ° 9 L 9N Yn • �" e W ry .yO {, W • •"'� Y Y O G •J 9 �IA•1 Y o r iAtI ^ "' •L°. Y i. Y ii r pry 00 �w W W . 96ry u V VWSY MY F9 A�• Y i$ N E & "� + CY IL F°$ •.a v� �c 1D�n m . 0 N C pL 00 y x OY 0N 0 W�QP LL 0 > 0�M N YAW pmp z Sp00Y AS LOm p' M NNC pTL'i pN M L• NU1t 2� bA0 C N Y �a O Ol 0 y Ap TNU W ON A S ` uA.Yi OR� 5 c mq .Yi 0 - s• 40 O FfuNY .. 0, acv z° a pg A >u0•• � Y L o..0 .�W 00 p � N 5� U C ♦V pp d.N i a" .p AplU N N 2 GvoT m u _ � qTq..�'i V Y iyU V N A Y •Uj NA A y `° yAp pqO MY0P �/•n//�� A W vl Y YY ,•pp uy yy ww--Il q� yYA�M LiyR 4Z N > w0 A p WG OW 9 U w 0 O a C N N Y p �`JJTT A I.1 3rlM 9 y0\ C �yY•A y11 UN /] A W a Nrv9 Oy YN gYR �°' p YMC 1 R /•1. w CNC N N E L N qq£ YUyy88 Ay rTl U Y 01 nt . M N y p'•A/.Ai F Q L W U U M N U K Y o Y pA, '� U • ry S •m £ yrvANAAyy fU U yT A _ _ - TPC W A N • A Y Y A ®y A A A W V/CU C V £WN P 4£ YN 3Ri£ U NV N . . "� :: •�n�\� ���dui• �V t ♦ � .: . . ter;...; ill � hull `.;,�% .`• �: 01 O �� �d 11 ,. rani 0 • R sr O.AW[T�ACaIE TRIEA4A9ERTV AT FEU MV ERNRV FOR aMaLoma R7®R4Cfl secnox-•.u• 1 t c WERLONG AVENUE L ANOBCAPE comoo®R •,o....o<..,,,. ••••�°"•,•°" SECTON-MR' ,,,,•,,, ""° EAffiT[DAM CAOQYCH ROAD LAHWCAFE 4REA7XEWF AECTOM-'CC ' , �r„ A � � ` L 2. ri s:. . , em o` n.._.n.. ..a 1,•, ,.;i .. �:. �.,ry .x.: .,.AnRff N—., cmas„s.m.,s o f4b. .....,,._ _ ..,....• ECOHOMCOEVELO%IEMAGfKY .�•s. �1Yn �:i r^ me,r,orm eivm•erunr•wr.sw uar.esa .,.�n'•nn.ur•. STERLING AVENUE AREA fPem«mll PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ACCESS IMPROVEMENT S MAINTENANCE DISTRICT omroo• ,«, }T Tp©pl}T 11 SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE/MITIGATION PLAN ';��'�+ :�• � '�' ,{ eft;. ,ro ' wool�•'° fete' i i•. a ,d i•. ' e ' '1 i.4rf�ai:. jr A e bA ,,n:.• rZ�rV� rl � w ' eAa • pf 4 < o z" All HMO g t to t 8 a N� O o a _ tl Q O a¢03 2 {;¢ e v r 000 R • o a Q �zzoo¢W NM �lj �ZNi7> S y xww> pppz csog2wo II ?SNOZ pp 3 .u_F gc .LL ¢ate x e •x \� •Y wow .`N..W G QNRz<-wZS a a1'' • I `\ p �� Y F 3 d y ?�wZO Z (L W yt=_7w� 0 2z cc Q o N vmLTn f :!€ of Ell jig o - F N n"e F uE RS 5e 6e 6�� Bel 8f h8 1 p 6e7ijj!•jf.� {ej}�3 } R %Y .............. ........ ........ ., s ! �................ .. ........ ........ .. i o_�su yy 9 0 _ ON S Eg< 0 9es SEY�°5 u 52 ?cS= ^^ °= o3 my' �o3i r5caa°cc <� `dQo Z3:-28E-V. uZpv ie a'-S �yE A E a E Y>•V ° OEo° Dy$� �2E9 - g-�, CN ; eo _ a _go �. o> � ogE5��3a Tmp ra....0 o ° d �EVZE e OZ— Nc vam 0.�[pU q om �4 oe u EE€ ' 5 > ° E o m - q^ ILO T q0 ed° _ q wGq �_ ?Y iT BT a^o� E O � C6'eoc95 S V Q ; [ � G o 'Ly 9O•.�S mm �°J U5 E O4•'.0 'tee !a� b ��eQQtaop — Ea xECo� E9° q�qd 0> O �y6'� y �> 3 'J 9 u � }s$ VT g35� a = 5 = =L umJW�V m5 •eE s�mE=vms��T 3a =90 $ C M 3 �< 'o$:r main u6 ub.: >,E E S D 9 . csmN T^ mu cs > cEm:_E F, J5C� Se N ,I. Y9 e8 ° 3o=W3,x 42 9 9 0 c E !l < e0 A @g 0 Bc a oa � Ed o3Cg vo�3EY� nu�S � U3c ° Y5 4 C p. Z.U e S� gw.L > U Z $ 8� L66- EYb€ E E5� EuE Nvl N.S N3 l^ c LL �44• E^ yy > G`o C�-.. — Sm Ss Paz QI JC'fi93f� �v� 5c o4cg3E�o3 o mYv -sM� oi 6'a o.5 in�3 {L Z4NC.INN N T O 5b�-9 a WUU v c �° F'W�4c Zy^E.; S� C--CoS_ `o y u� J p 000 'Hy.P p�pY TS 2p 9Y5Tel. T� E §— A VY�O 4YU SOGOf Qn �j OF 5 W yNUy .a E°058 -L'suAE c NCg3w_ E `o_ a E NV > Sc9 v � o< 5yy°� Uz<°s9,so 8E�- .q&ro U�LQL O.ENy O-go Yf.l R EM uEcb =? aq r. � o u��J 3'u'2538.E >^ fEE s xo.t.:E^E Y.- o o U R_ > ��SC ,°^, 5 .;ay ��',3 m�i's q ° < G<Y Y5 nZ "o' o�vmi nC Ba 53aa°ate cY e� „ t; ° d ua >, vE5 M-SOEa9 i 5 ;. a �t�`£ ^Q uE in .1ti3 YXb �e `O UCJ E.N' s�.cO°EI<o , x Cg„��'u �r�w^•�•4YC o$ V m m tl ^.sac° ELL'n o � Yac :i�nj�pppo ,,.;'� V0Y$665 N' t' _�y f I I g e 9N.K L LI V ` Elsa U P U T V ^>u.'ed C 6' mL a Yoe 6yyo E�$ i.bec W'Sp$^y`W'� L'= .8 y�30_ E ut sS€ S E5- 5.- 4c9oo <NO$'-c 55u c _ yp aN� b6l" T 005y Oy �yC �IL >e >i+ yN6C pyY � 3 p(r Q 900..0 y .Wj 6'- C � O � , O 02U Y4 UW G > Oti S � ^ ySNx �}F� cmoV8 >� p5 jC�'Y'..�� p3 Y $ � 5=EE5E .'50 .l.. 3 SV �UY Op^ ONSYY � Ui] ^6'OW m` ySC U �'L�' C CC E eO V O6 ° L�`�4^. �' O O^° .[J' „ gqccLL WS .cy� c ou OE gg Ys 8 Na En T^ °� °�,°,°a 4°� cY c�oN e� `o .°� Ec EC5sY'. 5 UO 6t'oT .s.pa ya c.a° uN CV td �c° xQ cv a� ��:s ° 8E`'n vvE��'s i'ia� °m° c•• 8.3 > on.�.$CY5 °'c E'ggqg is pp B $ <N p;v.6 EY�j � =BQou V s.=a c$u Qo > W3: L FM qq dr ti TN 'E 5 `y^EE > p9 0 $ 8 E o�u c �9� 5�'e '� oE o5;3E ., SAS= u �'e iJ Dl V �WF` SmU TU«a` OU sEW`W 095 c u f V U B �SI�• � d N � b �l� i 1f Z \1\N H yZj N MMp ii y i Q lV d G w F ^p IQVU oA!!w ✓py of Se � z � i 1 OUR N E E .. ..... QyQy \ F F S \ A G4gi I \ A p w.n n✓ua.n \ t I� t� 3 t R R z f 0 S e ; A ,\ 8 a a 2 j a i ' r axmx um .•Nwtxa 1NOl'tl'J 1NMdOl3A30103ro8d 3'UAQ/ty*r '.,, .v avux a. fain°r'wia Boa r.ox5 wnor.—�3Qp xr i r to n 1G 71 i NO worg +® bur .„ r ((li "f a vidd ►, X100 \ c� lW��tleTyiklI�� a.. faoy`ui 6 a a s v nl � F• ` 'dip_-. yj �, j �I. „��"" )) • t j n,R-d ad' F ' '/ , ` ICI IY.I - r / ��' ' . -✓ �\ •R S���� N . � 5. . Y I �'V'' � // ./ l � Al r,: � �. � ��\5' i .' ,�} �� r' - � •� 3 \/ ,�� j ' ��� % r•.� 9F ' � �b, F ` ,'� 1 ,1 ss s.a -. 'g,_ � y1�( . At f p f • n � v��r' �� �� I F � i S''�;1•. a /• \ . i 171 . r •• • ,t .: 6.E F I •� ` aww stm uPTRf>A 1NNI1•tl'�.,:;; :1NJWd073A30 1D3rOtl g } u . . . . I IIA , r ` \\ . . . . . . . 5 Ilk • '� ••Y\ t t w / l \\ l ��,,� . : \'•. �: 5� .,� ;' �Nk . t , li Cd ' %, 41 J4 , i .rl, t t! � 7 � 1 'l sx [.- "!�„ Y / �-j- L '..y Kt 745h• �. .'.� it r ' b _ ^�'1+� -.+f �i?t`'{r- -5 �` �v.-•n"--r rf 5- wt' "F t `rJ,._. +` �r7.{t � 5• `,1.411 -I I �l "I^�.� . I•�t ... t 'tl '9 1N3YIdOl3A30103(•Otld y�rp/ JS • .oei mri ......rTeuewi iara.. _._ .._AS[PIYbPSFrlit7bINfl1Z-''"'PdPdFOi 76 llP1 Y e)a}13.N , . . . . . . . a jig • ' � $ �� III f � ' � uu' Y . } 1 K C , I I I r I appp i,, I ' r+. fly Do Io �.p►�s��:� d���il►��\ \ ` ►mss fill'� � ar A ' � sf"�0�►C,���I j���jpl�r/9Ci, p W� 10-0 ` �► Ilp'ip ��I��li�' r��j���Y 1 i��© �� it s�l r� ■ DD '� 1� ���rii!�►��r��gy I� ��; p y � II � I 09001 ►��6�����,5jol l prna�' illl'16uN�ra�gr;1 r (''�, r ililltlsr` i�'�i�I � 'OVION4��1�II II�IIII 11 go fill ,r�., 1� Pj^ _jj' lit ga ITT wal ON �s��i.'��•`•• ri'A crc-� «"�FilT�lls r I r�rl I,I JQ/� I 11 , r le 'x° 1Nf1'1 b 9 -1N3rwo- as n3roud /ui:q/g4 i __ '" y'NM vro rmmm�a xSi.ow rorar IDtl x rr r r f. } � y 11 •.RII �r Y� r ��, FN I 1'1 JA . ,-L R f L1�'. 1 S 1 � I 0 O JR^:_ Rm� ip r o owzw e a ouuv°_ ZN y 024=J ¢ Z J W U Z =oswo- » II < � v C.S' o(Dm~u 9 uF- 2 =amiw0 18 °1 I; y OLL O ZZH02. b ' �I pYl I Vi . 0 LL LL1mo LL�o. B +0 x \\ F- N va�iZ Z QQOOF.W 8 m • � 6 Hmaw» ..ua m + a: Owoo W W -c¢w0 a I ❑ p z0 � 3 a $ °Ir, z r.: ? xggFq y{t 1 z .lR FE.lP �$7t!°qy` fl Aar! �h . •�66�9 �p� 9 pi 8¢�����tig �: a. 33. .� "sss fiYe Fa . - _ All ! 6 / ^ ■ � :iii.% �k y \ .:':� i•� �� • - • J r' i � r' � �, � r./ I • p � ' p�� "Ill gyp;. '� � �•�F.�r p/^ � � I �`— '' �r .=}��. ':.:' // /)/ /:�1 .�. . a ��� a � • ;!� � �� o YLFt CLB . y Arl I WARNER W. HODGDON HEART BAR RANCH,ARROWHEAD SPRINGS POST OFHCE BOX 2156 SAN BERNARDINO,CA FORMA 92506 (>IO 881-150 TELYMPY: (714)886-9961 May 2, 1994 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 RE: Stubblefield Public Hearing May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. y March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) West/East Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property (1) Stubblefield Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment (2) Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access Variance (3) Stubblefield Sub-Standard 25-99 (124) year Development Agreement (4) Initial Environmental Study and Negative Declaration (IES-ND) Council/Planning Agenda Item 27 Dear Mayor and Common Council: At the April 4, 1994 Public Hearing regarding the above, I presented and submitted related letters, documentation, photologs and the City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements April 4, 1994 Report. Enclosed herewith is the City Clerk's office April 11, 1994 letter ratifying the various comprehensive deliverables submitted for the Public Record on April 4, 1994. (See attached April 11, 1994 City Clerk's office letter RE: Warner Hodgdon deliverables submitted for the related Public Record April 4, 1994,Council Agenda Items 35 and 36) I hereby submit the following this date, May 2, 1994, to the Mayor and Common Council and the City Clerk for the Public Record: 1. Warner Hodgdon March 22, 1993 and February 15, 1993 letter(s), attachments(s) and Photolog(s), etc. submitted to the Mayor and Common Council for the Public Record March 22, 1993 RE: City Attorney Outside Council and Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property 50 year Development Agreement with City Maintenance. Sworn Testimony used in Stubblefield April 2, 1991 $11.5 Million Damages Trial, and Sterling Avenue Area. 2. The above Warner Hodgdon March 22, 1993 and February 15, 1993 letters, attachments and Photolog(s) etc. were Re-submitted for the Public Record to the City Development Environmental Review Committee (DERC) and Planning Staff at the DERC meeting of August 26, 1993 RE: Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s): (1) Special City Sub-Standard Access Development HERBAGE OF THE MOUNrAWS AND VALLEY BEGAN W 1850 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 2256,ARROWHEAD BPR@]GS,SAN BERNARDM,CALRX)1081A 92506 RENDENCE HARING:3295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDWO,CALIFORNIA 92405,(714)883 4153 j AmARMM1 V.NOGG. ___AWI_ 7 ?ta7 Page 2 Code Amendment, (2) East/West Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Variance, and (3) 25-99 (124) year Development Agreement, IES-ND(s). 3. Warner Hodgdon April 19, 1993 letter and attachments to Henry Empeno, Deputy City Attorney RE: DERC April 15, 1993 meeting, Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) re-submitted for the Public Record to the DERC and Planning Staff at the DERC meeting of August 26, 1993 RE: Stubblefield three March 26, 1993 City Sub-Standard Access Planning Application(s), IES(s) and ND(s). 4. Warner Hodgdon February 20, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Fire Chief Will Wright RE: February 8, 1994 Planning Commission Meeting for Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s). 5. Warner Hodgdon April 5, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Fire Chief Will Wright RE: April 4, 1994 City Council/Planning Public Hearing for Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s). 6. Warner Hodgdon April 19, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Fire Marshall Guy Burdick RE: Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s), and City Administration, City Planning, City Fire and City Engineer non-concern of Rancho San Andreas Company Financial Feasibility for the Sterling Avenue Area Two Feasible Full-Standard Access Road(s). 7. Warner Hodgdon April 20, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Shauna Clark, City Administrator RE: City Creek Scenic Drive Enviroscape and Improvements April 4, 1994 Report (Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) for Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s). (Underpass Connector and Frontage Road(s)). Stubblefield un-permitted City Development Code Violations caused by Massive Grading/Bulldozing, Removal of Trees and Stumps, removal of Historic 1884 City Creek Canal, dumped debris, boulders, foreign materials dumped over the cliffs into the City Creek Streambed creating Downstream Hazards. 8. Warner Hodgdon April 21, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer RE: City Administrators early 1994 request for Stubblefield east Rt. 330 20 acre property review for June 1992 un- permitted Massive Grading/Bulldozing, City Development Code Violation(s). 9. Warner Hodgdon April 29, 1994 letter for the Public Record to Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer RE: Sterling Avenue Area City Full- Standard Two Different Feasible Access Route(s) and Multi-Plate Underpass y preferred by the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement, lr-^�' WMAGE OF THE MOUNL AND VAIL'.V BEGAN N IS" (� V HEADQDA nM:POST OFHGE M)R 21",ARROWHEAD SPRWGS,SAN RERNAIIDDLO,GALRORNIA 9206 W �V/ RMDENM HARING:3295 RROADMOOR BODLEVARD,RAN RERNA WO,CALFORNIA 92W.(AA)99MIS3 WW A VARWR V.HOOGOON FAMILY GROUP M9 n Page 3 Fire Chief and City Engineer for required Rancho San Andreas Improvements with no concern as to Cost Feasibility, and Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s), April 1994 Caltrans Rt. 330 Project Engineer confirmed Stubblefield un-permitted Massive Grading/Bulldozing, Removal of trees and stumps, Historic 1884 City Creek Canal, etc. 10. Warner Hodgdon May 1, 1994 letter for the Public Record to the Mayor and Common Council and Al Boughey, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement RE: Stubblefield Public Hearing May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. Council Agenda Item 27, i.e.: Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Sub-Standard Access Route(s) Variance and 20-99 (124) year Development Agreement. The City Attorney's Office stated on April 4, 1994 that it does not approve of the Resolution(s) for the east/west Rt. 330 Stubblefield Sub-Standard Variance and 124 year Development Agreement. The 124 year Term is uncontionable, and more important the Development Agreement is not in compliance with City Code Ordinance(s) or State Law. The Development Agreement must set forth the Use and Plan. I reconfirm our April 4, 1994 Public Position and concern for City Full-Standard(s) with no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. RSA-Highland Hills will participate in the proportionate east Rt. 330 Frontage Road Improvement(s)/Maintenance District(s) cost, including like consideration for Rt. 330 City Creek Scenic Highway Landscape. Thank you for your time and consideration. We believe the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland Deserve City Full-Standard Streets ... Too. Respectfully, Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Shaun Clark,City Administrator Al Boughey,Director, Planning,Building Services and Code Enforcement Roger Hardgrave,City Engineer Will Wright,Fire Chief HERBAGE OF THE MOUNrA AND VALLEY BEGAN DI 1850 {}} OHEADQUARTERS:POST OE BO%2116,ARROWHEAD SPRW(S,SAN BERN.0 0,CAIhORNIA 92106 W RESIDENCE HAWING:3291 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNA WO,CALDORNIA 92101,(711)88301 S3 WW A WARMR V.HOMWK MMRT 60.0 AiFlI n �e6RNARD�No SP _ Py 4 ! C I T Y O F a an 15ernardino �OGNDED LN`0�0 R A C H E L C L A R K C I T Y C L E R K April 11, 1994 Warner W. Hodgdon Heart Bar Ranch, Arrowhead Springs P.O. Box 2146 San Bernardino, CA 92406 Dear Mr. Hodgdon: This is to acknowledge receipt of the documents you submitted during the Mayor and Council meeting held on April 4, 1994 relative to Development Code Amendment No. 93-05, Agenda Item 35, and Development Code Amendment No. 93-01 and Variance No. 93-07 Agenda Item 36 as follows: Letters dated February 18, February 20, and April 4, 1994, directed to Al Boughey, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement; Letter dated February 8, 1994 , directed to Robert Stone, Chairman of the Planning Commission; Letter dated April 4, 1994, directed to the Mayor and Common council; Report Book, Schematic Engineering Plans and Cost Estimates entitled "City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements east/West Rte. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police - Fire- Emergency - Recreation Trails" prepared by Aaron Hodgdon and Warner Hodgdon dated April 4 , 1994. The Mayor and Common Council voted to continue the matter to May 2, 1994 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North 1'D" Street, San Bernardino, California. Sincerely, Diane Jones Deputy Gaty 1(alFerk o X 1 3 1 3 . S A N 8 E R N A R 0 1 N O . CALIFORNIA 92402 3 0 0 N O R T H D S T R E E T . S A N B E R N A R D 1 N o NI�1PRIDEPROGRESS C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 4 1 8 - 0 0 0 1 (9 0 9) 3 9 4 - 5 0 0 2 �I'r (9 0 9) 3 9 4 - 5 1 0 2 F A X -(9 0 9 ) 3 8 4 -5 4 6 8 1 WARNER W. HOwG "M ms BAR RANCH.ARRODGD seaNes POST Om¢BOX 31947 SAN BERNARDWO.CALD'OBNIA 91106 (714)391-1547 'IFIEDOPV: May 1, 1994 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino Mr. Al Boughey, Director Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 a RE: Stubblefield Public Hearing May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) West/East Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property (1) Stubblefield Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment (2) Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access Variance i (3) Stubblefield Sub-Standard 25-99(124) year Development Agreement (4) Initial Environmental Study and Negative Declaration(IES-ND) Council/Planning Agenda Item 27 Dear Mayor, Common Council and Mr. Boughey: The following is submitted for the Public record regarding the above, but not limited to, related issues: 1. The City and Superior Court approved the May 16, 1989 City/Highland Hills Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement and effective concurrently with the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/PEIR. The Homeowners January 14, 1988 Legal Action(s) against the Mayor, Common Council, City Development and Environmental Review Committee (DERC) were Dismissed as part of the Settlement Agreement. The ity of Highland had appeared with the Highland Hills Homeowners Association as Amicus Curaie. Other parties to the Settlement Agreement were William E. Leonard, President, San Gorgonio Development Company; William G. Smith (deceased); Rancho San Andreas Company (RSA); Warner Hodgdon and Highland Hills Properties, a Limited Partnership sell r by William E. Leonard,General Partner. William F Leonard is the Highland Hills Ltd Partners General Partner William Smith(deceased)was a General Partner. Limited partners nre•Jeffrev and Marvin Reimer (Former Sun Publisher) Glen L Davis.D.D.S.. Carl Hendricks.MD..Dr. Wilbur and Henrietta Eich. C. L and Leona Bangsund.Martin and Margaret Match Dr.Philip and Janet Pope and Dr Elmer Hansen 2. The Highland Hills Homeowners Association, President, Mr.James Nunn,Captain S.B. County Sheriffs Department, appeared before the Mayor and Common Council at the applicable April 4, 1994 Public Hearing and voiced concerns for the Public Record as to the 3 lM' HERITAGE OF'n1E MOUNFAW S AND VALEY BEGAN IN 1856 V HEADQUA nKS:POST OFFICE BOX 21K,ARROWHB.SD SPBWGS.SAN BERNARDWO,CAnFORNiA 92A06 �/ RESIDENCE WMNG:3295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD.SAN BERNA ENO.CAnFOB 91901,(111)883-0153 A mA0. Rm.XO - FA M6 MOM AFF n Page 2 City/Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement under the July 3, 1989 City updated General Plan/Development Code. Mr. Nunn conveyed that the City was now going back on that Agreement. Accordingly, Mr. Nunn informed the City of Highland, Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino of the, (1) Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Scenic Highway Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary Access, (2) Special Code Amendment (3) Variance, and (4) 124 year Development Agreement, June 1992 caused City Creek Downstream Hazards, etc. This matter was discussed on the City of Highland Agenda at the meeting of Tuesday, April 26, 1994. The Highland City Manager requested all related documents from the City of San Bernardino Planning Department. 3. Warner Hodgdon appeared before the Mayor and Common Council at the April 4, 1994 Public Hearing, voiced concerns with solution(s) and submitted various Documentation, City Certified Minutes of July 15, 1991 and March 22, 1993 Council Directives and Photologs, etc. for the record. The City Clerk's Office April 11, 1994 letter ratifies that which was submitted for the Record by Mr. Hodgdon. (Sw attached April 11, 1994 City Clerk's Office letter RE:Warner Hodgdon submitted documentation) 4. W.J. McKeever Engineering is both engineers for the contiguous Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 "Mountain Shadows" and Rancho San Andreas Company Highland Hills (Forest Creek Country Club and Resort). The W.J. McKeever April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) submitted to the City document the east/west Rt. 330 existing Sub-Standard to City Full- Standard Costs, and that Two Different City Full-Standard Access Route(s) are Physically and Economically Feasible. (For Reference: See April 4, 1994 City Creek Scenic Drive Enviroscape and Improvements Report, Schematic Engineers Plan(s),Cost Estimate(s)and illustrative Cost Map) 5. On April 4, 1994 the Mayor and Common Council unanimously continued the applicable Stubblefield Agenda Item 36 and Public Hearing for the intent of further City Planning Staff review with the related party(s), i.e.: Stubblefield, RSA, Highland Homeowners Association, City of Highland, etc. Ample time was allowed for this City purpose by the continuance from April 4, 1994 to the Mayor and Common Council meeting of May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. 6. On April 4, 1994 the Mayor and Common Council approved Agenda Item 35, Special Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment and IES-ND. The Mayor and Common Council then approved the required Second Reading at their meeting of April 18, 1994. The effective date is 30 days from City Planning properly filing the Notice of Determination with S.B. County and the State Office of Planning and Research. 7. The April 4, 1994 Stubblefield Special Development Code Amendment Planing Staff Report prepared for Al Boughey, Director of Planning Building Services and Code Enforcement states: 'This Amendment proposes a set of criteria that could be used by the City to consider the approval of subdivisions which cannot feasibly provide two standard access route(s). Key Points: HERBAGE OF Y11E MOl1NTAIN9 AND VAl2EY BEGAN aV 1150 (� OHEAOQUARi M:P OFH(I ROX 2W,ARROWHEAD SPRD4G9,SAN BERNA WO,GEW 92A W RESIDENa MAnE4G:5295 BROADMOOR BmnEVARD,SAN BERNA WO.CAMEO 92tl4.(714)88M153 WWW A VARNER W.HODLOON FA yckoU AR1a n Page 3 "A tentative map may be exempted from providing two standard means of access, 1930.200(6), if the Fire Chief, Planning Director and City Engineer find that:" There is no feasible alternative to DrovidinE two standard a .sacra,,, rou!elsl "If a tentative map is located within a Foothill Fire Zone, and the above finding(s) can be made, the map must still provide nonstandard secondary access to accommodate emergency vehicle(s) in accordance with the minimum width and local requirements of article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code (20 feet). ' non standard a roue is an access road that not meet one or both of the criteria stated at the beeinniny of this section. Clearly the Special Development Code Amendment, the April 4, 1994 Planning Staff Report, the Department of Public Works/City Engineer February 2, 1994 Interoffice Memorandum and the Fire Chiefs February 1, 1994, Inter-Office Memorandum addresses the PHYSICAL FEASIBILITY of two City Full-Standard access Route(s) for Public Health and Safety. The Special Development Code Amendment clearly DOES NOT provide for exempting Public Health and Safety two Different Feasible City Full Standard Access Route(s) under the hidden guise of FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY. 8. The City Administration, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement, the Fire Chief and the Department of Public Works voiced no consideration of concern as to FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY for City Full-Standards to Rancho San Andreas (Hodgdon son's) Sterling Avenue Area property through December 19, 1991 to July 3, 1993. Never-the-less Rancho San Andreas Company volunteered two Different Feasible City Full- Standard Development Code Public Health and Safety access route(s) at a proportionate cost of$700+ thousand The Sterling Avenue Primary dedicated access is a 60 feet R/W 40 foot curb to curb paving sidewalk streetlights trails) landscape trees irrigation and internal 24 foot curb to curb paved Secondary Access and Primary Access with 28 foot-16 foot high Multi-Plate Underpass. 9. Per the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommendations, the April 4, 1994 adopted Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code is applicable only for City consideration of Subdivisions which cannot feasibly provide two Full-Standard Access Route(s). May 2, 1994 Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access roads Variance and 124 year Development Agreement: 10. Per the April 4, 1994 Planning Staff Report, the February 1, 1994 Fire Chiefs and February 2, 1994 City Engineers FINDINGS by Inter-Office Memorandum(s), the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommended the Stubblefield Sub- Standard Access Route(s) Variance and 124 year Stubblefield Development Agreement covering the east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property. A Fire Chiefs February 1, 1994 FINDINGS and partial Quote: "Based on the information available,there does not seen to be a feasible way to provide a standard,secondary access." B. City Engineer's February 2, 1994 FINDINGS and partial Quote: HERITAGE OF I MOUNT AND VALLEY REGAN W 18" OHEADQUARTERS:POST OP !OX 2W,ARROW SPRI14M.SAN RERNARDWO,GILYIRNIA 92b IT RESIDENCE MAR :3195 BROADMOOR ROUIEVARD,SAN EEIWARDWO,G.V3FO 92W ,(n4)8830153 WWW A iARNEA V.XOOGDON FANM1Y GROV —n • Page 4 "The Stubblefiield's purpose to use the east Frontage Road is for their primary access. There is no feasible way to provide a standard secondary access to the site." C. The Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement has not provided his written FINDINGS along with that of the Fire Chief and City Engineer that there is no feasible way to provide a standard, secondary access to the site. This is as required under the newly adopted Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code. 11. The Stubblefields "Mountain Shadows"/Rancho San Andreas Highland Hills mutual Engineer, W.J. McKeever's April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) submitted to the City documents the east/west Rt. 330 existing Sub-Standard Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standard Liability Cost, and that Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s) for Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property are physically and economically Feasible. Variance and Development Agreement "Moot": Therefore the Stubblefield east Rt 330 1City Creek Canyon Sub-Standard Access Variance No 93-07 and the 124 year Development Agreement No. 93-01 are "Moot" and not needed as handled and recommended by the Director of Planning. Building Services and Code Enforcement. 12. At the April 4, 1994 Mayor and City Council Public Hearing the Deputy City Attorney, Henry Empeno stated the City Attorney's Office position. Accordingly, the City Attorney's office does not approve the Resolution(s) for the Stubblefield Variance and Development Agreement due to: (1) the 124 year tetra under page 4 and paragraph 5 is uncontionable, and more important, (2) the Development Agreement is not in compliance with the City Code Ordinance(s) or State Law. The Development Agreement must set forth the Land Use and Plan. 124 year City/Stubblefield Development Agreement IES-ND: The Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommended that the Mayor and Common Council approve the Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property 124 year Development Agreement IE -ND. The Initial Environmental Study-Negative Declaration (IES-ND) and Variance is INADEQUATE and the City Consultanti'Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement did not address the following future Accumulative Impacts including, but not limited to: 1. The April 15, 1991 Mayor and Common Council Directive to the Department of Planning to process the City Initiated Amendment to the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR RE: Stubblefield east/west RL 330 766% Density Increase, including 480 High Density Apartments (24 DU's per acre) east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property). The purpose was for the Proposed Settlement Agreement regarding the Stubblefield$11.5 Million. HERITAGE OF THE MOUNTA AND VALLEY BEGAN W 18" OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 2W.ARROWHEAD SPRDiGS,SAN RERNARDDiO,WIFOPTIIA n1 IT RESIDENCE WA G:3295 RROADMOOR ROULLVARD,SAN RERNA WO.CAnFORNM 92A .TAI)893-0IS3 w QDA VA0.MA V.FIOaUON F.Y MR AFFIl n Page 5 2. Caltrans/Federal Highway Administration constructed a 178 foot protection/retaining wall along east Rt. 330 to preserve the Historic 1884 City Creek Canal east of the old City Creek road. The Environmental re-evaluation was under the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Final Section 4(f) evaluation (Historic Properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places), National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC 470F) and California State Historic Preservation 36 CFR Part 800, National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). The measures to minimize harm to the Historic City Creek Canal (City of San Bernardino) were discussed with the Highland/East Highlands Historical Society, the Executive Director of Cultural and International Affairs for the City of San Bernardino, Historic Preservation Task Force, the City of San Bernardino Historic Society and the San Bernardino County Historian. This was in compliance with 36 CFR 800.1 (c) (2), public participation in the Section 10b review process. By June 1992 Stubblefield had bulldozed out the Caltrans/FHWA preserved Historic 1884 City Creek canal east of Rt. 330 and the old City Creek Road, the City Full-Standard(s) width (Minimum 24 feet or more) of the east Rt. 330 Frontage secondary emergency road extension can now be widened under the Caltrans/City MOU to the 124 year City/Stubblefield Development Agreement. This access width then also allows the construction of the north east/west Rt. 330 two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Road(s) Multi-Plate underpass (Minimum 24 feet or more). FHWA July 1990 Final Section 4(F) Evaluation: Historic 1884 City Creek Canal Measures and Minimize Harm: Page 6, Para(s),Quote: "As discussed above, there are no feasible and prudent alternatives which avoid the use of Section 4(f) land. The preferred alternative is a feasible and prudent alternative,which,after consideration of mitigation, will result in minimal harm to the City Creek Ditch. The following desigli measures were deveLWed to minimize the harm to the Cily Creek Ditch." A 178 foot long retaining wall would be constructed at the base of the embankment where the East Frontage Road crosses the City Creek Ditch (see Maps C and D). In so doing, the proposed frontage road would use an existing crossing of the canal. This measure would avoid using any part of the canal east of existing City Creek Road. 1t is thepartsQfthe canal roof City Creek Road and west of existing SR-330 that retain the highest degree of integrity " (For Reference: See July 1990 FHWA Evaluation Exhibit Topo Map B and Topo Map C of the Historic 1884 City Creek Canal,Eucalyptus Grove large trees) (For Reference: Sce attached July 1990 FHWA Final Section 4(F)Evaluation for: Rte. 30/330 Freeway Re: 1884 Historic City Creek Ditch) 3. The July 17, 1992 Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement Interoffice Memorandum recommended processing the Stubblefield 44 acre west Rt. 330 Borrow Site,Fill Material Sale to Rt. 330 Caltrans/Contractor, underlying 80 Mobil Homes lots, Primary Access and Draft September 11, 1992 City Consultant IES-ND. The July 17, 1992 Interoffice Memorandum includes, as attached thereto, the July 14, 1992 Planning Department letter to Stubblefield, i.e.: east/west Rt. 330 Frontage Road(s) Connector Underpass built by HERITAGE OF THE MOUNFA AND VA Y BEGAN V 1850 OHEADQUARTERS:FOST OFFICE BOX 21K,ARROWHEAD SPRBJGB,SAN BERNA WO,CAiLOR 92q IT RUDENGE MAn2NG:5295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDDiO,GALXFOR 92A ,rn4)8830155 ����//// A VARMR V.HOOGOON —YGROUP AFFIl _ Page 6 Caltrans to City Fire Department Health and Safety Width Specification(s) (Minimum 10 foot wide unpaved Equestrian Trail(s) tunnel). By October 23, 1990 Stubblefield Sworn Declarations, under Penalty of Perjury for the Trial, they represented Agreements to sell Rt. 330 Fill Material from the Mountain Shadows 492 low income Apartment Site and west Rt 330 Borrow Site to Caltrans Contractor. In April 1989 RSA-Highladn Hills committed to Caltrans/Contractor to provide the Rt. 330 Fill Material at no cost. 4. The March 22, 1993 Mayor and Council Directive to the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement was to process the related Environmental Review of the Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property April 15, 1991 Density Increase, City/Caltrans/Stubblefield three party 50 year Development Agreement, investigate the existing east/west Rt. 330 Frontage Road(s) Sub-Standard to City Full- Standard City liability cost of improvements/maintenance and un-permitted violations of Code Enforcement per Warner Hodgdon March 22, 1993 letter, documentation and photolog(s). 5. The Stubblefield un-permiteed City Development Code Violations and Downstream Hazards caused by June 1992 from Massive Grading/Bulldozing of thousands of boulders, debris, tons of foreign material, removal of complete Eucalyptus Grove large trees and stumps, etc. by dumping over the cliffs into the City Creek streambed. Downstream Hazards,but not limited to, impact the SBCT&FCG,EVWD,Caltrans,RSA and existing Homes east of the City Creek Levy in the City of Highland. 6. Caltrans designed the Rt. 330 Freeway to accommodate the City Improvement of the east/west Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standards Primary Access width, i.e.: 40 foot curb to curb paved section. This is the width Re-evaluated, Re-confirmed, established and approved by Planning, City Fire and City Engineer for the Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Access effective July 3, 1993. 7. The exposure to the City or Stubblefield for this premeditated sub-standard emergency access procedure liability, i.e.: Stop Rt 330 Freeway Traffic at a point of high degree curve bank super and 7%D grade, cut the Rt 330 Fence down, pull up the post and then drive emergency vehicles down a 1200 foot 7%± grade unpaved road is not acceptable. And in the back-up alternative, expose the City even more to another premeditated sub-standard emergency access procedure liability of a minimum 10 foot wide unpaved equestrian multi- plate tunnel at the end of the 1300± foot long 32 foot wide east Rt. 330 Road Cul-de-Sac. 8. The City Full-Standard Improvement of the Sub-Standard west Rt 330 Frontage Road would require the west extension of the existing Equestrian/Emergency access minimum 10 foot wide unpaved tunnel. The extension required by the City Full-Standard street width would cause IMPRACTICAL, if not impossible, emergency vehicle egress and/or ingress. (40 foot curb to curb paved section plus sidewalk, landscape, irrigation, trees,recreation trail(s) and rail(s), streetlights, drainage,etc.). 9. The improper drainage for the existing west Rt. 330 Frontage Road at the west ingress/egress of the equestrian/emergency Tunnel (Arch Pipe Culvert) has caused the failing of the slope bank(s) and which are sliding into the lower Mobil Home(s). The 3/4 to 1 Cut Slope Bank(s) to the north are also failing from Springs and Instability. This is impacting the Health and Safety of the above Mobil Homes and the City Development Code allows a HERBAGE OF THE MOUNiAI?Z AND VALLEY BEGAN W ISM OHEADQUARTERS:POSE OFHCE BOX 2146.AIMOV1IIEAD SPR M.SAN SEMARDINO,fA1JFORNIA 92M6 W RESIDENCE MAD -3295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BER INO.CAl2FORNIA 92404.M4)883-0153 Ai NER V.HO .N lAM6T G0.0VPARRIAiE Page 7 maximum 1.5 to I Cut Slope Banks only. There is on-going evidence of high potential City Liability. Adopting Resolution: Authorizing and Directing the Mayor to Execute Stubblefield Development Agreement No. 93-01: With sincere knowledge and experience I strongly recommend that the Mayor and Common Council not approve or execute the Draft Resolution or 124 year Stubblefield Development Agreement as prepared and apparently mis-handled. The Draft Resolution is written, adverse to the Public Health. Safety and Welfare of the Citizenry, but not limited to, and is inconsistent to the facts under Section 3 Recitals, Section 4 Negative Declaration, Section 6 Findings, Section 8 Notice of Determination and Section 9 Recordation. The 124 year Stubblefield Development Agreement and the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement process therefore is unclear as to: (1) City Sub- Standard Access Procedure Liability, (2) the existing east/west Rt. 330 Sub-Standard Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standards Improvements/Maintenance City Cost Liability and responsibility ($1.5± Million), and (3) the City liability for City blatant non-response to known Stubblefield un-permitted Development Code Violations by June 1992, including Massive Grading/Bulldozing, removal of the 1884 Historic City Creek Canal, removal of complete Eucalyptus Grove large trees and stumps, debris, thousands of boulders and tons of foreign material dumped over the cliffs into the City Creek Streambed causing serious Downstream Hazards to Public/Private Facilities,i.e.: SBCT&FCG, EVWD, Caltrans, RSA and existing Homes east of the City Creek Levy, in the City of Highland. I reconfirm our April 4, 1994 Public Position and concern for City Full-Standard(s) with no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. RSA-Highland Hills will participate in the proportionate east Rt. 330 Frontage Road Improvement(s)/Maintenance District(s) cost, including like consideration for Rt. 330 City Creek Scenic Highway Landscape. Thank you for your time and consideration. We believe the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland Deserve City Full-Standard Streets ... Too. Respectfully, Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Shauna Clark,City Administrator Al Boughey,Director, Planning,Building Services and Code Enforcement Roger Hardgrave,City Engineer Will Wright, Fire Chief WMAGE OF THE MODNEAEVS AND VAIIEY BEGAN IN 1850 ((�� OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOx 2116,ARAOWIIF.SD SPRINGS,SAN BERNARDINO,CAllIdRN1A 92b8 [l? RESIDENCE MARSNG:3395 BROADMOOR BODIEVARD,SAN BERNARDINO,CAIIFORNIA 92101,(n1)883L153 A WAM1NER W.HOOCpON FAMRY GROV AF1'II n • �e6RNARDANo c - m C I T Y O F O r - 2 • j�o - , �ED IN an j)ernardino R A C H E L C L A R K C I T Y C L E R K April 11, 1994 Warner W. Hodgdon Heart Bar Ranch, Arrowhead Springs P.O. Box 2146 San Bernardino, CA 92406 Dear Mr. Hodgdon: This is to acknowledge receipt of the documents you submitted during the Mayor and Council meeting held on April 4, 1994 relative to Development Code Amendment No. 93-05, Agenda Item 35, and Development Code Amendment No. 93-01 and Variance No. 93-07 Agenda Item 36 as follows: Letters dated February 18, February 20, and April 4, 1994, directed to Al Boughey, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement; Letter dated February 8, 1994, directed to Robert Stone, Chairman of the Planning Commission; Letter dated April 4, 1994, directed to the Mayor and Common Council; Report Book, Schematic Engineering Plans and Cost Estimates entitled "City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements east/West Rte. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police - Fire- Emergency - Recreation Trails" prepared by Aaron Hodgdon and Warner Hodgdon dated April 4, 1994. The Mayor and Common Council voted to continue the matter to May 2 , 1994 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North I'D" Street, San Bernardino, California. Sincerely, Diane Jones Deputy Ontyi(aLerkox 1318 , SAN RERNARDIN0 , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 4 0 2 3 0 0 N 0 R T H D S T R E E T . S A N D E R N A R D I N 0 PRRIDE '1Y•1 OGRESS C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 4 1 9 - 0 0 0 1 ( 9 0 9) 3 8 / - 5 0 0 3 � E°S (9 0 9 ) 9 8 - 5 1 0 2 F A % -( 9 0 9 ) 3 8 -5 4 6 0 UW ON 0N0 > U F > 3 u o ono o I �',1 w y M V1 0 H `� w I w ' ; oM W w U >4 UW U z � > NI In z cc cc 01 kn � FF � � W v �� Q I w � 0 •: .� � Z V � a � Wa .. V1 FM �r M F I AV ' J iA7 ' � W UQ W C us vi ds * a I QI i U w o {i' �l ���l T � 11 �� _ (�i� • �.7 �j � R.. as � d' d 16-i-Y QB Mtl 7tlI7LL S39 NO lw 5119 1� �IO� OJ Nouvwv'I U MS 73La37 't ��' a '�% h. • r"�' m ` ° °� W /+TODO 009 A � y Z O • I 1 / �' (rc-�-z axv i�si-v -I/OB 4 �)o W • y 1 U1 w Un O 3O v, . g N9 M a s ►� � �� �sa�a �� � �' R � x a w 5' �• g i R CPS t, e4 tz ZfE dE m« m Off• ••i >, U fit ,. •' v '�� o a T 1��1 .• Z'J W I yIT� U.+ ..�..� �• � yam., 6i 9 a. iii \ �: e �o :f ,...� o \, �\ C \\ z ry a C q m d^ A c A wQ � 9 w G r - U " as AA o � con ZO o ` a� a W � Wy y' � U rt T W � � • 3, i � � a u-� ° a 0-0 U G W � U i O U � � oq z [L T v Q T � U D c 4 d0 T ►1 [ `� O > c GGGiii C 3� > .�, UU ° ^ ¢ 3 "a aQA 6 3 UU c °i c nc ° U > Q oQ AU °o c o � � ;�C q T O: w 'ed O: UW � C' R' $ A bo o Qu„ U` c � 3 x £ x U 15 o 0 v .2 C d w t N d : p Q Q � � oMU cy cTi ti? p .a .0 o E E w° U'? c c° ❑ p Z U 00 N 2 -0 te o II e ° v) oc.N•, y �c w � W [i � -a °' E O ° "U v ° va, x c`iW 4Q I I y � > 5� c ° 3 c ¢ o � oc r� ° 2 E c . M.0 y U �» w 2¢� y Q c c EU a �j y o x $ U N II II 3 0 0 E EU 8 'oU o a d a c c ca. u u q9 o v max `° bq A3 F vC N N y L b pa C U td r Q W R ea d�a N 00 N d T xUU o ° A o vow V y g o y ^ . w vtr U OO 0 CL, .0.0 o z D � cz W a; aa AAA Ln .a � » I Ig ° q �s�s� UUU 60"6s Cg CJ _ RnACNnI� {� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FINAL SECTION 4 (f) EVALUATION _ FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STATE ROUTE 30 FROM ARDEN AVENUE TO FIFTH STREET . AND ROUTE 330 FROM ROUTE 30 TO 0.7 MILE NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE O8-SBd-30-R26.7/R30.3 08-SBd-330-28.7/30. 3 08201-157901 . Prepared by: Department 'of Transportation - District 8 San Bernardino, California JULY 1990 u • m 4 � I Y e 4• W • O . : Z 1 .1 1 I • '1 h O {{ 5 co M r l i 1��+�7 1. 4 1. i » ¢ F• Y N O t I. 1 }I I�1l�rQ Yj°13aY z c i V) i.f_._.i 1 x m v ... � ✓YYY""" O m , a _o • O C y .... W ..._._._ "�Vf M N.O-._. . 3 °�K 0p- 2cx Oepy j0 N �ufC 05 CL `qi � K � �NJ u ¢O co ONIadi Omm V Q lfl U N s O. O M • � ffO VU," ] co Z O Cl) W r co WaTino0 t.; O O 7 W 7 Q O a Q W ` >< i a o.o ,oso io xco-"'L L ,. Z 0 ( i p Z W AV N]anN] C �. � OZQz ¢ N Z V J F Z = o a F II o Z gOxwO � � Q O � z xc - LL =a U F- [C = Ma = = �I O LL X Z ~ U. Q LL. ; CO f'• '^ LD W O W 0 U. 07 T '39NVa0 ' Z Q 0 H c I,[ V~1 Z 4 = FW—�W m In u?a � s w a �'•� y W D J E AV tl 1N]] Off. � Zz > 0 ? M c WZM {� uj N 0 LU Q G U. O r l JI a w � N cc Z = N V( VR1]IA CL. LL CA M I I Z I L IIL O Atl tl � ; T AP �• O J V 0 Y pq ~ 0 Z�- co C U O Q ? N a IIs�m N m u m m i i 3 � � a n y •4 � JG� U 3Atl °NIla31L � « m ¢Y < W � J N W � W. a u R � � R W y �. • 00 A N ~ R O O 3QF�jO{ IIP V 1 S V O 6 W N W 7 N c d ° F «S H x ° e V O > y y O O i O 0 Vp$ „ v m v 1 �' / �-----�/pis•' �s�• • / / /•� a t - r:=_ _ _��` /�. ,,/ �• /ref �° $ i'. t,\„;. iy,'•1T1.;:.,Y �\. \ /' � I _ ` • .M' wWt , •�i•I ��! / : � )) !�-�;�\°��S `j' •• of . ♦�—� � � _ ` _� ! .:. :. _.����°• �/ � �.,;:. , 1. i ,• ♦ a Y'v.? p� '• J/ .. Y : / � r . \ i \♦ • � u. a zw 1 CC t• �1� ;/� /''I'I�S � `•�, it // /)/ �• M' � 1 / .�� r '�1 �. `pD C�=l jo Gb+ �' Yi CC r Ali NN • ` (.� Ali � -- i k �o' � ` ,9.\ � �- . � •:�C-- � � � ( Ff : p 717 �,,:m—��j•��i// '�� \ \ ` v Nil �' .fir•- i f 8�r ,� \ a j�18�� ' / ,e "'L./"\.. • 8 �' \ � 1i � •3 �'— 1 � 'L p •`• � 1 + yam' �, �i mo :. 1 i WARNER W. HODGDON HEART BAR RANCH.ARROWHEAD SPRINGS POST OFFICE BOX 21K LM SAN BERNARDNO.CAIJFORNIA 92986 (714)181.130 TH )996- (TI4)BBi-f/i3 March 22, 1993 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "Y' Street San Bernardino, California 92418 RE: City/Stubblefield Agreement Primary/Secondary Access Rt. 330 Council Agenda Item 39 Dear Mayor and Common Council: The above referenced Agreement with the City/Stubblefield was first placed on the Council Supplemental Agenda Item S-3 February 15, 1993. It was continued from February 15, 1993 through March 8, 1993, March 15, 1993 to March 22, 1993. I have patiently sat through three all day meetings in order to address this issue and to question it's benefit and Public Purpose. First, the Primary/Secondary Access referenced to in the Agreement are Sub-Standard to City Fire, Health and Safety Code and do not met the provision thereof. Secondly, these ' access roads east or west of the Rt. 330 Freeway, which serve Stubblefield Property only,do not meet City Street Standards for acceptance as City roads, little alone the City 50 year maintenance responsibility of same under the Agreement. The liability to complete and bring these Roads and access into compliance with acceptable City Street standards has been ejected to cost $780.998.00to cost $780.998.00. Accepting these roads in any existing as is condition or future in principle commitment to accept Sub-Standard requirements and the approximately $800 thousand for City Road Dedication compliance, should not he a City liability. (See attached March 22, 1993 Road Access Cost Projections Rt.330 Freeway) On July 15, 1993 and under Council Agenda Item 38, but not limited to, the City Attorney recommended that the City initiate an Amendment to the June 2, 1989 Updated General Plan for 480 High Density Apartments (24 DU's per acre) on the Stubblefield property east of Rt. 330 and along City Creek Canyon. The Council approved Mr. Penman s recommendation for the appropriate Public Process. The property in question is to be served by the Primary/Secondary access under this City/Stubblefield Access Agreement being asked to be approved in principle today. Consideration of Illegal access to City Code and acceptance of Roads that do not meet City Street Standards to this property should be done at the time of the pending General Plan Amendment Public Process. Another City/Stubblefield Agreement in principle to conflicting City Code and Standards is only asking for similar exposure to the $11.5 million Damages previously awarded. The City Attorney declines to sign this Agreement as to form and adequacy, and he is correct. HEMAGE OF THE MOUNTANS AND VAIIEY BEGAN N 1138 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 21".ARROWHEAD BPRNGS.SAN BERNARDNO,CAIMOR9BA 92906 T RESIDENCE MAM1ING:3293 BROADMOOR BOU2EVARD,sAN BERNARDNO,CA RNIA 92",(]111 8 8 3-013 3 VWW' A VARNER V.NCIXAON i/.M6Y—Afi11JATE Page 2 (See attached March 10, 1993 City Interoffice Memorandum RE:Stubblefield Agreement) In addition, on July 13, 1992 the City was requested by Stubblefield to again start the process for a Rt. 330 Borrow Site and Grading Plan on their property in order to sell Fill Material to Caltrans/Contractor for the Rt. 330 Freeway ($3 to $5 per cubic yard or $1.5 to $2.5 Million). This Borrow site west of the Rt. 330 had been going on with the City Attorney's office since before July 15, 1991. In fact, no Stubblefield Freeway Fill Material was ever required and/or by Caltrans/Contractor for the Freeway since June 1992 and this had been met by excess din graded from the Wal-Mart Site. By City letter dated July 14, 1992 Stubblefield then met with the City to also become more familiar with their 20 acres property east of Rt. 330 and along City Creek Canyon. The July 14, 1992 City letter is an Attached Exhibit to the proposed City/Stubblefield Access Agreement. The mass grading activity that occurred on Stubblefield property before and in May/June 1992, but for fate, would have been the cause of several fatalities and cost the lives of one family or more, including children. By Stubblefield mixing their heavy equipment in along with the Caltrans/Contractor earth moving construction for the Rt. 330 Freeway, by the end of June 1992, Stubblefield completed massive grading over the contiguous twenty acres and the 480 High Density Apartment Site along City Creek Canyon. This included, but not limited to, the bull dozing of thousands of boulders and thousands of tons of material, debris and tree stumps over the cliff and directly into the City Creek Canyon Streambed. The streambed below is the Homeless Village built for several years and occupied by various families. Fortunately, one shelter plummeted in the early morning by giant boulders was not occupied by the parents and children normally there. I addressed this serious matter in my February 15 1993 letter overview and Photoloe to the Mayor and Council and which I shall express to you for your full attention and for the public record today. As stated at the beginning of this letter, I have patiently sat through three full Council meeting only to have this matter repeatedly continued. I thank you in advance for patiently hearing and receiving the facts of this travesty. (See attached February 15, 1993 letter to Mayor and Common Council RE:Supplemental Agenda Item S-3) Respectfully, W Warner W. Hodgd gdon CC: Mayor W.R."Bob"Holcomb Esther Estrada,Councilwoman Ralph Hemandez,Councilman Valerie Pope-Ludlam,Councilwoman Michael Maudsley,Councilman Tom Minor,Councilman Norine Miller,Councilwoman Jack Reilly,Councilman James F.Penman,City Attomey Shauna Clark,City Administrator HERBAGE OF THE MOU]Srr 2 AND VALLEY REGAN M 19SO QHEADQUARn":POST OMCE ROX 21".ARROWHEAD W24GS,SAN RERNARDDIO,CALIFORNIA 92b RESIDENCE MAKING:3295 RROADMOOR RO1aEVARD,SAN RERNARMNO,CAL601UNLA 929 ,(]M)5934153 WWW A VARMR V.NOOGOON FM y mom AARIATE Projections Only: March 22, 1993 City/Stubblefield Rt. 30/330 Freeway Agreement Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary Access 50 year Development Agreement Stubblefield Vested Rights and City Maintenance Route 330 Scenic Highway (Expressway) East Access Road: City Creek Capon: Item Unit Price Quantity Total 1. 6" Curb and Gutter LF 7.00 5,600 39,200 2. 6' Concrete Sidewalk SF 2.00 16,800 33,600 3. Guard Rail (Trail/City Creek) LF 20.00 5,600 112,000 4. Equestrian Trail SF .50 16,800 8,400 (Horse Tunnel) 5. Street Lights EA 3,500 12 42,000 6. Parkway Landscape (Trees, irrigation, Banks) Scenic 75,000 Drive 7. Signal 25,000 1 25,000 8. Secondary Access (21/2") SF .65 28,800 18,720 (1200' x 24' w/Berm) 9. Secondary Access Berm LF 2.50 5,600 14.000 Subtotal $367,920 Plans, Engineering, Fees 15% 55,188 Subtotal $423,108 Contingency 10% 42.310 Total $465,418 Route 330 Scenic Highway (Expressway) $315,480 East Access Road: Mt. Shadows Foothill Land City Total cost of Sub-Standard Primary Access Compliance $780.998 and Sub-Standard Secondary Access (See page 2 for detail) City of San Bernardino Capital Improvements required for Sub-Standard East/West Frontage Roads Code Compliance and east Sub-Standard Access. In addition, the City will provide all maintenance cost thereof under this 50 year Development Agreement. The City Attorney has requested that the provision of a $100,000 Credit only be included as a pan of the City/Stubblefield 50 year Development Agreement against the $11.5 Million Stubblefield Damages and/or final Judgment. Page 1 of 2 Projections Only: March 22, 1993 City/Stubblefield Rt. 30/330 Freeway Agreement Sub-Standard Primary Access Mountain Shadows Foothill Land Route 330 Scenic Highway (Expressway) West Access Road- Mt. Shadows. Foothill Drive: Item Unit Price Quantity Total 1. 6" Curb and Gutter LF 7.00 6,600 46,200 2. 6' Concrete Sidewalk SF 2.00 19,800 39,600 3. Guard Rail (Trail) LF 20.00 500 10,000 4. Equestrian Trail SF .50 3000 1,500 (Horse Tunnel) 5. Street Lights EA 3,500 22 77,000 6. Parkway Landscape Scenic (Trees, Irrigation, Slopes) Drive 75,000 Subtotal $249,300 Plans, Engineering, Fees 15% 37.500 Subtotal $286,800 Contingency 10% 28.680 Total $315,480 Route 330 Scenic Highway (Expressway) $465,418 West Access Road: Mt. Shadows Foothill Land City Total cost of Sub-Standard Primary Access Compliance and Sub-Standard Secondary Access (See page 1 for detail) $780.998 City of San Bernardino Capital Improvements required for Sub-Standard East(West Frontage Roads Code Compliance and east Sub-Standard Access. In addition, the City will provide all maintenance cost thereof under this 50 Year Development Agreement. The City Attorney has requested that the provision of a $100,000 Credit only be included as a part of the City/Stubblefield 50 year Development Agreement against the $11.5 Million Stubblefield Damages and/or final Judgment. Page 2 of 2 C I T Y O F S A N B E R N A R D I N O INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: SHAUNA CLARK, City Administrator FROM: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer SUBJECT: Item No. 34 on Agenda for Council Meeting of 3-8-93 -- Agreement with Stubblefield Construction Company s Caltrans DATE: March 10, 1993 COPIES: File No. 7. 01-29; Reading File This item was continued to the Council meeting of 3-22-93. The property owner (Stubblefield Construction Co. ) needs assurance that the basic provisions of this Agreement are acceptable to the Mayor and Council in order that they may con- clude their negotiations with Caltrans relative to acquisition of a portion of their property for improvement of Route No. 330. Therefore, we recommend that the Agreement be approved in principle, and referred to the Department of Planning and Building Services for environmental review and recommendation by the Planning Commission. There may be a question if the Mayor and Council can approve a deviation from the Code requirement for two means of access by dedicated and paved City streets . Several items of concern were noted during review by staff, which need to be negotiated with the other parties. Therefore, we recommend the following substitute motion: "That the Agreement with Caltrans and the Stubblefield Construction Company be approved in principle, and that the Agreement be referred to the Department of Planning and Building Services for negotiation with the other parties over areas of concern, environmental review, presentation to the Planning Commission for a recommen- dation, and initiation (if necessary) of an amendment to the Development Code to allow the Mayor and Council to grant a variance, to the requirement for two means of access, for those parcels that cannot reasonably comply w. 6EARG.tHARDGRAVE RGH:rs X39 WARNER W. HODGDON HEART RAC RANCH.ARROWHEAD SPRINGS POST OFFICE BOX 21K SAN BERNARDINO,CALIFORNIA 93106 (714)381-I50 February 15, 1993 =Econ.9963 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 RE: City Supplemental Agenda Items S-1 and S-3, February 15, 1993: Appropriate$200,000 from General Fund Reserve to City Attorney Budget RE: Outside Attomey(s) City/Stubblefield Agreement Rt. 330 Primary/Secondary Access Dear Mayor and Common Council: This letter is for clarification to the above February 15, 1993 Agenda items covering Stubblefield Mountain Shadows Primary/Secondary access Agreement, City Attorney Outside legal cost of $200,000 and submitted to the City Clerk for the Official Record. Earlier today I handed the Mayor and Common Council my letter of same date regarding Agenda item 32, Establishment of an Assessment District for Dedicated Sterling Avenue Primary and Bonita Vista Drive Secondary access. Said letter also addressed my being singled out by the City Attorney in the cause of action and allegations filed Friday, February 5, 1993 by Fish and Game. This covered the area of Sterling Heights and Highland Hills, which is immediately contiguous to the east of Stubblefield Mountain Shadows. It is ironic that the February 15, 1993 Supplemental Agenda Item S-3 request council authorization of an Agreement in which the City accepts a Primary and Substandard Secondary Road Access to Stubblefield Mountain Shadows Property east of the Rt. 330 Freeway and along City Creek Canyon. The City is asked to accept by Agreement full maintenance of the Roads, as they are relinquished by the state to the City, regardless of meeting full City standards and the Cost of compliance to the City. Through Mr. Empelio, the City Attorney wants a provision added to the Agreement for a $100 thousand credit toward any future Stubblefield Judgment against the City arising from the April 1991 $11.5 million damages the jury awarded Stubblefield. Mr. Empeno handles all City litigation, however, outside Counsel has now been retained in the Stubblefield matter. (See attached February 15, 1993 Supplemental Items S-1 and S-3) (See anached Caltrans Policy and Procedure No.90-04) (See attached February Supplemental Agenda item S-3,City Engineer 2/8/93 memo, City Attorney 2110/93 memo and Agreement with maps and Planning 7/14/92 letter) On July 15, 1991 the City Attorney recommended that the council initiate a General Plan Amendment covering the Stubblefield Mountain Shadows 20 acre property and could be served by these roads now under the Agreement for 480 High Density (24 units per acre) apartments. It is not without coincidence that we were singled out by Mr. Empeno and the HERITAGE OF TICE MOUNTAWS AND VAI I TY BEGAN IN 1930 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 2116,ARRONFKEAD SPRINGS,SAN BERNARDDIO.CALIORNIA 92506 RESIDENCE MAILING:1295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN RERNARDINO,CALIFORNIA 92101,(711)9130153 WWW A WARMER W.XOpCAON FA YGROG"AFFUATE Page 2 • City Attorney in the Dedicated Sterling Avenue and RSA Highland Hills cause of action filed Friday. February 5. 1993 with Fish and Game. The Stubblefield attorney under the $11.5 million damages against the city also • represents the Sterling Heights property owners. The same attorney filed a claim against the City in February 1992 as to the City handling of the Sterling Avenue and Foothill Drive Area property. The July 15, 1991 Council Agenda item 38 covered 29 acres of Stubblefield Mountain Shadows Property only. After the July 15, 1991 Executive Session Mr. Empefio represented the City Attorney's revised Agenda item 38 recommendation to the City Council for a Stubblefield Settlement Agreement. This covered, but not limited to, a City initiated General Plan Amendment to the City July 3, 1989 Updated General Plan, encompassing 283 Stubblefield foothill acres, a density increase of 766%, including 480 Mountain Shadow high Density Apartments along City Creek Canyon. • (See attached July 15, 1991 Stubblefield Property Map and General Plan Amendment Compilations) (See attached July 15, 1991 Council Agenda Item 38,29 acres only,Stubblefield) (See attached July 15, 1991 Certified minutes RE:City Attorney's Recommendation of Stubblefield 283 acres) On January 14, 1988 a Writ of Mandate Action was filed against the City, Common • Council and City Environmental Review Committee for approving 491 Apartments in this immediate area along City Creek on December 7, 1987. This was not an RSAC project, however, my family's legal council, Reid and Hellyer, voluntarily defended and held harmless the City, Common Council and ERC members and held them harmless. A Settlement Agreement and Dismissal was approved by the Superior Court July 3, 1989. On July 3, 1989 a Writ was filed on the City against it's new updated General Plan. At the • request of the City Attorney, voluntarily my family's Legal Counsel again defended and held harmless the City. All matters were successfully Settled and Dismissed at no Cost or Loss to e City. RSAC (my family) absorbed over $500 thousand dollars in legal cost to successful defend the City and resolved the related matters. In July 1992 the City Attorneys office, through Mr. Empelfo continued it's scheme for a Stubblefield Settlement. This included having the Planning Department process a misleading Borough Site/Grading Plan with Initial Study for the purpose of generating Rt. 330 Freeway Fill Material. However, all remaining Freeway Fill Material required was obtained from the Wal-Mart site development and completed in May 1992. There was never a need for a Stubblefield Borrow Site as RSAC Highland Hills Ranch had committed to • provide the Freeway Fill Material at no cost in April 1989. The Stubblefield borrow site and grading plan was actually for 69 Mountain Shadows Mobile Home Lots and a new foothill toad access.The goal was for them to be implemented prior to the approval for the July 15, 1991 Mountain Shadows City initiated General Plan Amendment, recommended by the City Attorney. At that time Stubblefield sale of Fill • Material to the State at $3 to $5 per yard was contemplated by the City Attorney and Stubblefield. The City is now being asked to accept the Frontage Road on the east of the Rt. 330 Freeway and maintain it under a 50 year Development Agreement in favor of Stubblefield. It • HERBAGE OF THE MOUNTAINS AND VALLEY BEGAN IN St" {$ OHEADQUARTERS:POST OMCE BOX 1M5,ARROWHEAD SPRINGS,SAN BEENARM0,cAuBGBN1A 92N IT RESIDENCE MAI[3NG:3193 RROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDINO,CALIFORNIA 93Na.(714)ISM153 �/ A WARNED V.NppGppN ®FANCY QION ARWAiE J Page 3 is couched in the Agreement as Primary and Secondary access onto the Rt. 330 Freeway for any future density under the General Plan. Caltrans letter dated October 19 1989 stated that the request for access and frontage improvements by the developer throueh City Staff are clearly adverse to State Policy. Freeway Funds will be put in jeopardy. The future density for the Road access could include the 480 High Density Apartment property the City Attorney recommended for the City initiated General Plan Amendment on July 15, 1992. In and before May 1992, Stubblefield heavy equipment completed massive grading on this property and other Mountain Shadows property. Thousands of boulders and thousands of tons of related material, debris and tree stumps were bull-dozed over the cliff into the City Creek Canyon Streambed. (See attached Cahrans letter dated October 19, 1989 RE:Developer Access Adverse to State Policy) The upper piles of graded material crashed down onto several tents in the Homeless Village below, built in and along City Creek. Fortunately, there were no immediate deaths caused, as the Closest family with children,normally sleeping in their tent, were not there on the early morning the bulldozer began and boulders wiped out their shelter. The village has a commissary , no sanitary facilities, neat rock border paths from tent to tent, three generations of dogs, open fire heat and cooking. Of the multiple Wildfires along the Rt. 330 Freeway and Mountain Shadows there was also a City Creek fire recorded, put out by Fire authorities and named the Homeless Fire. I respectfully submit that the City Attorney asking for a $100 thousand credit against the $11.5 million Stubblefield damages and by allowing this as the only provided economic consideration to the agreement requires added thought. The roads for City Acceptance and maintenance in perpetuity are on both the east and west side of Rt. 330. Does City acceptance include all prior cost to be paid by the State for, Curbs, Gutters, Streetlight, Landscaping, trees, irrigation, Fire hydrants, Signals and meeting standard City requirements, including cut slopes? It is my further understanding that the City Attorney and others have flown by helicopter over the entire foothill area from Sterling Heights east to Mobil's East Highland Ranch for complete surveillance, visual comprehension and photologs. This includes, but not limited to, the CDF-FP East Highlands Area Vegetation Management Program and Prescribed Burn which was implemented December 16, 1991. Enclosed herewith is the prior and ending June 15, 1992 Photologs of City Creek Canyon and the area west and east of the Rt. 330 Freeway. Prior RSAC Photologs of the State Rt. 330 Freeway construction in the City Creek Streambed with over one thousand eucalyptus, alder and Sycamore trees that were bull dozed down, have been given to the City Attorney in January 1992. Respectfully, cGIJ�cS� � Warner W. Hodgdon Shauna Clark,City Administrator Al Boughey,Director of Planning and Building Services James Penman,City Attorney Dan McKinney,Esq.Reid&Hellyer Lisa Visingardi,Esq.Reid&Hellyer HERITAGE OF THE MOUNTA AND VALLEY BEGAN DI 1950 (� OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 21",ARROWHEAD SP t Q,SAN BERNARDENO,C ORMA 91A86 (�7 RESIDENCE MAR5NG:5395 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SANBERNARDINO,CAIIFORNM 921W,(n4)885O155 A OAIMEA V.NODGpON FA T GROUF AAp n SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA FEBRUARY 15, 1993 V/S-1 Approval of appropriation from General Reserve to City Attorney Budget to fund outside attorney and litigation costs. (See Attached) (Cost to City — $200,000 from General Fund Reserve) MOTION: That the Finance Director be instructed to draw down additional amounts not to exceed $200,000 from the General Fund reserve to fund payment of outside attorney bills from the following City Attorney budget accounts: Litigation-Outside Attorney (001-051-5-3049) and Litigation (001-051- 5-53050) . S-2 Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of Program Supplement No. 77 of Local Agency Federal-Aid Projects, between said City and the State of California, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, relating to the rehabilitation of pavement on Arrowhead Avenue, from Mill Street to Third Street. (See Attached) (Cost to City-- $51,042 from Street Construction Fund) Ward 1 MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. 2/15/93 • S-3 Resolution of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of an agreement between said City and the Stubblefield Construction Company, relating to access for the parcel north of Highland Avenue and east of State Route No. 330. (See Attached) Ward 4 MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. S-4 Authorization to issue Request for Proposals & Purchase Order for Micro Computer -- Traffic Forecasting Model. (See Attached) (Cost to City -- $150,000 from 1/2 cent sales tax-local funds) MOTION: That the Director of Public Works/City Engineer be authorized to issue Request for Proposals in connection with establishment of a city-wide Traffic Forecasting Model pursuant to the Congestion Management Program. 2/15/93 .,3F .eid ..p i$ fi,Y ai.ya✓ T^x s.°.€ .$F '{"p ss :' ryF:y. F � e �}-°<' �.�rtsajx� ��> i r5. , t i{� ♦, Sf1�'. `,� �r "� ',�y",��,,s,. Y ti S✓a `t s Yom- rAf F� :'rY t^'�'�,�`:n,. � y`Yh d. � y.. �,a i' � t' °��i�� r � °t a5t a•. � +bg` r'> ,Eu � '`.r /s'�'•�"�sf.' 'a -'r,. �� �'' 'Y�+"��< ,b��d - �� .§� . a .. w, a� { �., r� < �'ra v r �'s n < } a F Ya r �5��e�y 1 _✓� y�� X.,SGtr d�� x.�"y� _.. }ay �r t p. �"�<" �� lr e. `5'lp. ,Y.{� �rX9,��y�g�. ♦4 r �. y. � i�a'.���`��'r<. } 1> Kr64;33�,$ tT``557issh$+}«�..�jl T Pl �' .-s t.T"-. .,+y' ..., •') r tt ''r"h- F � ..+a fir. m i 2 w y T 5 ✓$ , , lyr K a r g 2 .,yam yid 4"'i,w�ar yY ,� eft •� a4 ��� 2 v.A ��� ° a $e3y'{., a''Sx •`S�aJ''.w)g. ,v �.3 %.0 S �Y'�d Fp, c t } 3 N'f;s•� � �. .et � �+ )y' ' r.�,'�,,,Fl(('KP�''�i+tY'`r' ��f,,,�y�W,e,•� 2,C�+�''.StT���S� } a� "�sa}•.t.,i�'4 "1�i & t'f`�j°},fiv_ °F?'� �.�r'T3` tTa°rt'�1 a'yy�',t� raiti .� .f ��4T+�� .� ° •�Y Ja2�4�l±�Ft xVi}IY �s vs� + fi y � Y4£ x ={.y'.s.�v_7..sR .%r�T.1 r�j+�eia to �^Ys1"*������' t�irYex'Tuf ��+.�""� �^"C'.�b♦ w,yM`cy�,�p# �'7'ki� " aga,�l'�� t. .+_�P' 'q^��Sx ♦y lij,K � �f` T' Y'Y.C'F f. '��' w�9•,,'rr a A 3 t Tier -r a -a} 'rRvc _}� {.ts� L 1 !r` `Y"�i ` 9 Y � ':i+�i vMy Sf��✓ 11 t °d{5.'t;3Yr tii'd "pby '4fC 4y O tai t d�tSs �-�"' ��;ys�'}4� .uyx` ,�`� � ��•� ',rf ��loil+21�x av"��,,,., v� ) •«r 4'+t4 # F �'"I 1'r w .'� rv� T.2 i 8 .a F 4.1",� ��''f � 'F M e .t t;'Se'� r• :k � r y- fi iN' f r$ L n t�F y F -5,..rk,r.,C�3y. _ u;r- .y F -"E�'' y�Y s k� 3n v.� ,� � :r t tie ' `[`F°� v�J�T5 `•' u, 1 ;2'� s � e, {11 4x Mw"ty�� 3•� '.c .A�.-:# t F.sv JY• $':W `s n �# N 43 rt" t ?t te',t� M a v-y„A>ki vNr�lb'rr +t2'�i ' c6� '.`z'! T.aa"'x•ny {fJ y 4. dM 1I +` Yiy ' n'?7S, '�`"?' _ 1 } h _. ��V4R .AF ?��`�r�� u�'•»y,� 4S5' !" �'"YAt�b'' '�t�2z a+"`,>��s � �rF'rt' '�v��"4��'�;St�t�' ajy 3 �`jl,`� £ �' + c.:? •��F„ �r. kn � A " ra 3 ai.�t Y.:z t e f°" 'S..de�' • d Sgt 5,.e�w tWi s � q`1a n 1:cS^" e .� � L�.+Eam'.. . f {tr�'.T (Xa *i'.c'�.w,.• f •l� .-.<' K y4 � -4 i:...ey lv �,. [ w4'F. Y '4"� ., V. . • 3 V �F •,a A- � �!'-.. e\� � TAY -`F}{^. !'a.tv. ..v }y •". i{ Y 4 7 4 y e - 21 , e4.., ,Rjti c,P -27 Its+ z q sz policy & procedure w. 90-04 Emergency Access from Freeways and Erpressways F . SC ? ER urt w c Encroachr„ent Permit Divis'-cn" of Project Develoor.^_:It Nf�siD:S �"-NEAT '4'4�4 sions and Districts throuch Office Chiefs : . ?U3?CSE 4o establish a statewide po'-:c.- dealing with encroachment permits for emergency access fror:. the freeway and expressway system. :: . EAC:(f.ROUND A. Section 13862 of the Califcrnia Health and Safety Code Gives authority to Fire ?rctectior. Districts to provide for the preservation of 'life and pr operty from the hazards of fire and oanic Law enfo-cement agencies have simile - power to provide protective services . _. Local ordinances and plann_ng controls frequently require developments to provide alternate access for fire and ether emergencies as a condition cf development approval. -lie Department is receiving an increasing number of requests for emergency access from freeways and expressways . Typically, those requests relate to local ' requirements for new or expanded development or to recent emergency situations. In the past, some Districts have been allowing installations of breakaway fence panels and turfstone approaches within the right of way via encroachment permit when requested by a public agency wits justification. The increasing number of requests for emergency installations raises the question of real necessity. It spears that a significant number of requests may be 4e n'-erate3�v a desire to avoid proper i p-anninq and local street construc- o^ eliminaN on of the .feed Lo obtain as easement oc:side state ri ht o" way, o: a esire to maximize dcve oprtent area. In a wide range of circumstances, the placement of breakaway fence panels or- locked gates does not guarantee that the fence will not be c:t at locations nearer the emergency site . Policy and Procedure No. 90-04 Pace 2 of 2 III . POLICY A. To preserve and protest :he access contro in l sere in ;-`.e freeway and expresawa system, it will be the Depar[menc 's policy tg prohibit planned emeenet a cr r nenw n or expand I n � _, e O la . Emer enc _« d for and resided from local street. 0- V conventional hi hwa s t_tsi f freeways and exore^•.ay� Access o cont_o! ..m.ts n .. It is not acceptable f:: clannine agencies to r.ssur the access can be breaced, or provided for with breakaway panels cr 1--Cked gates in lieu of other appropriate alterr.at:ves . p_ov;c- C - The same prohibition of emergencv access shal apc:y for any request for additional emergency access to exi_tinc development . Exis[irc emergency accesses, granted in t Past, will be allcwed to remain . , In responding to emergencies, fire districts, la enforcement agencies, cr other emergency functions ma.: Cut or otherwise breac^ access fences if necessary [c quickly respond to a s.ecific emergency. In such cases, they must replace _fencGrg and restore the State riot of way via an encroachment permit at their expense . a 1°V. RES?ONSIBILITIES A. The District Directors of Transportation will be responsible for the following; ✓S . Implementing this policy. ✓I . Enforcing this policy. Q . Recommending any exceptiona to this Policy, B. The Office of Permits, Division of Traffic Operaticas, will be responsible for incorporating this policy :ntc the Permits Manual, C. The Chief, Office of Prole" Plzr,sing and Design, wli_ responsible for approving or denying any request for exceptions to this Policy. f �x����i��,Y�do �'*F^�7L•..,z.� ������ � �y ��.d,,,'tut �'� Y,�s r � } �YU .F �5 '', �'"YW�fl�q' Pr r.[r* .1,� � 9 � "^�'4d � r , e ��; L.�•• , ,� r�r:. F ,-.. a � '. "yt r : , aF S a J � f N�a yr'< � d t' v ��� �� f z > • : o �.� 1 3 r 9 • �• Je',�i � !' `� IiCyV. �}l u ' �•. a � V(`+ '.4' .�GS�` T .L • Y X14 . Y h ��.'. "9Jat "'+ttF ~ �'V-j� .tom . E ## �� �, •'t"1 5 a s r ai � �A y<�x ra,. •s a, �� �jfa° S a •� [PMI i t°'y `•>��'`��' � �+. �`*x�; a \ T f aP `! � &[�, ap� rt�i sFTy, #• ..i�� K xa w• Y� s<'t""t RaT\� �4k. .• � �'4 �i� �t�nrs` r :,� �c3 fye��'gi�'� �J[ F r•' i o- E;-.}"?'' y r4$ a � 'S[^Ciy �A p 'x' ,.• 's - 'L'�# s• .; .'u 4.. • '+� '{i.i�.•,.� * t"'M.rj^ [•L } •r"r 9'a .'•l;. t ._� 4x�' P•p+'d"% a ,�y ... ''.r s�''' rl m '^tart�`,,r µ.it > k. 4` i.{r�r 4�i 3 �i�•G.: :+,. .� r,; �F� n " ���y rirla����F� �u e�+}5��� �r � 'af �.{+`•�`ya 7, � b y.. > � .�����ppG tFffxy, I��`,fzi't�` >� .�rd5 x' F'a# f'i'' t'r• T.c "Y.2:*�1 S • " p7 a ,t$• i� e £ ��. . t•,��� Cif 4S }S h+ Jf ��5 y� .�+p rf��.�� �•,' syfE" �� .iiY+,$ } �t�`!rf'"a �•.�� i��n �r �i�,�"£� >a a r ' s°°gv? - w Y 5 iY '�•l"% '35� 4"1 t�i,.f�T �}�! y`�7r,,Xr 1� � k '� � a.4.`�• +,y5= h"�.}r�y, jl�i� c Y'°�y.i�. y, - ..- -. +'3xii ir.y - E .Fx£,r'� t rr Z4�'rt' J., tD„ ix'•e'(t' 1-k "•FS S ex+.:C, `�n.�'y e'ti's �' Ya''v,�"s#k.'u u'i•�'"rMt s 5^q�' '�"•�� n- Yr�' � .»x z�,s.(l��t • Y•'y f `t S ��3 a� a +e aF ""i1� � i' .7`i`,.:t ��jJ emu*.4 r !� {»�:^ } ?LF�� �i �o-a• ]c. l ,�. �Y'yf�� ii eep `.Y. )�M'.+• {i<'�(S Y'gKS�i .�, 3 9.$ -+fc" y3'jyes X•" pf.T =y�� 'r�T•p+}�Y���Y"�<3F fS��s�'4�.��� ��^� 514 ,e ! s <6r, u, rYE. >(,•.Tt •`i,k` i + -.. a". .., 4wtp''x+S.��4�..g�iMyA['r e^�'L'c� �+ ir",''y � ^s r•,7, . � w ,�¢W�45Y.�i"`+`- � �y,��p�.�"..,�.r�'�1,°` ' .1'a�`ia�rr+'S4?';•td' .,na f .y ,3�, tt+,Y' rA E; < 9'.4 ax7 � f i 5� M {� h h3frpi..r t. "•vY,f � a r, *' •ax�.m. '✓°v �.�•?f" f, .�{��,n7� �ft�.tlE +"4� �+R n.7� � ry�n, # r' a. y r ,. f �.F��,zp eY�ia z'�1y f� n?w�.:y .1�!.i`V'. @ .* �r w"RT���� t� s�k• .yr w �� IN OF SAN 13ERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION File No. 7.01-29 Authorization to Execute Agreement .om: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Subject: with Caltrans & Stubblefield Con- struction Co. - Access for Parcel Dept: Public Works North of Highland Avenue, and Date: 2'06-93 east of Route 330 Synopsis of Previous Council action: 05-18-87 -- Recommendation from the Legislative Review Committee, on provision of access to property abutting Route 330, approved. 10-02-87 -- Draft Freeway Agreement for Route 30/330 referred to Transportation Committee for review and recommendation. Recommended motion: Adopt resolution. cc: Shauna Clark Al Boughey Will Wright Jim Penman Signature Contact person: Roger G. Hardqrave Phone: 5025 Staff Report, Agreement Supporting data attached: & Resolution Ward: 4 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: ,s.nzez Agenda Item No �� J \'OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Page 1 of 2 There is a parcel north of Highland Avenue, and east of Route 330 , that is owned by the Stubblefield Construction Co. Caltrans is in the process of acquiring a portion of this parcel to accommodate the improvement of Route 330 . Access to this parcel has historically been provided by a rectangular box culvert under Route No. 330, commonly referred to as the Barnes undercrossing, and a private access road to the north. This private access road terminated at a gate in the ealong the Route 330 highway. Caltrans will be constructing a public street from Highland Avenue north to this parcel. Primary access to this parcel will be provided by this street, referred to as the "East Frontage Road, " in the proposed Agreement. However, a second means of access is required by the City' s Development Code for any new development. The proposed Agreement provides, in general, that the City will accept the East Frontage Road and Secondary Access (private access road) as legal conforming access to allow development of this arcel. Furthermore, that the City will acce t o roads or maintenance, and will not abandon either road wit out consent or e property owner. Since Route 330 has been upgraded to freeway status , Caltrans cannot allow a gate at the intersection with the Secondar Access Road. However Ca trans recognizes that the fence will be breached if it ever became necessar o use the Secondary Access Road during an emergency. ��L9t.Ec7liy 'off a,C) The Barnes Undercrossing has been replaced by a metal plate arch culvert, specifically designed to accommol4ate a fire engine. 1'F'A,un ,ddD ,acw Pig,,,alv.,-ifY 7XrrIS f/tuss) ov Ex fZ-xmEP Provision for access will need to be agreed on, before Caltrans can settle on 111 ue ion t port at t ey"are iu pvement 0 . CV/T.11 d1tV lgf'KceXr eos/ SjSr�E ///Dirt- During review of this Agreement by staff, the--city Attorney ' s office requested that the following clause be added:_ "1. Consideration In addition to the mutual covenants and conditions in this Agreement, the consideration for this Agreement is a credit to the City' s account, in the amount of $100 ,000, against any Judgement which is ultimately entered in favor of the Developer and against the City, or any agreed settlement, in San Bernardino County Superior Court Civil Action No. 242998 ("Judgement") ; provided, however that if the Judgement is less than 1100 ,000 (to and including zero) he con- si eration for this Agreement wil be the actual amount of the Ju Bement and t e mu ual covenants and conditions in this Agreement. " �' 2-08-93 5.0064 F SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT page 2 of 2 This clause is not included in the ro osed Agreement, since t e property owner is not in concurrence. The term of this Agreement is 50 years. The issue of access to this parcel has been considered by the Legislative Review an Transportation Committees on several occasions. The Agreement was prepared to document the under- standings reached during these reviews. We recommend that the Agreement be approved. URGENCY CLAUSE' Caltrans established a schedule of 1-8-93 , for finalizing the acquisition of the right-of-way from this parcel. The proposed Agreement must be executed before this acquisition can be com- pleted. 2-08-93 5 0264 i C I T Y OF S A N B E R N A R D I N 0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Common Council FROM: Henry Empefto Jr. , Deputy City Attorney DATE: February 10, 1993 RE: February 15, 1993 Council Meeting Supplemental Agenda Item - Resolution. . .Authorizing the Execution of An Agreement Between Said City and the Stubblefield Construction Company, Relating to Access for the Parcel North of Highland Avenue and East of State Route No. 330 CC: James F. Penman, City Attorney; Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works; Al Boughey, Director of Planning & Bldg Services; Mark Ostoich, Esq. The Directl2r of Public Works has proposed that the Mayor and Council adopt the above-reference -Resolution and approve e Proposed Development Agreement. The action proposed by the Director of Public Works is clearly invalid because it would • violate the City' s ordinances as well as state laws. Recitals Paragraph D and Operative Provisions Paragraph 4(a) of the proposed agreement represent it as a Development Agreement within the meaning of Chapter 19 .40 of the Development Code and Section 65864 et. seq. of the California Government Code. This proposed Development Agreement has not previously undergone a noticed public hearing before the Planning Commission as required by Development Code Sections 19.40.030 ( 1 ) and (3) ; nor has the City provided a noticed public hearing prior to the proposed Council action as required by Development Code Sections 19.40.030 (2) and (3) . This proposed Development Agreement has not previously undergone environmental review as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), at Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ; Development Code Section 19.40.060; and City Resolution 90-217, the "City CEQA Guidelines" . This proposed Development Agreement also does not comply with Government Code Section 65867 which requires noticed public hearings prior to the adoption of a development agreement. The above-enumerated requirements of state and local law relate to the processing and review of the proposed Development Agreement. The form and legal content of the proposed Development Agreement • must also be analyzed for other legal issues. Because the proposed Development Agreement does not comply with state & local law, as described above, the City Attorney declines to approve the Development Agreement as to form and legal content. HENRY EMPENO, JR. , Deputy City Attorney HE:js[Item2.Mem] 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAID CITY AND THE STUBBLEFIELD 3 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RELATING TO ACCESS FOR THE PARCEL NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND EAST OF STATE ROUTE NO. 330. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 6 SECTION 1. The Mayor of the City of San Bernardino is 7 hereby authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of said 8 City, an agreement relating to access for the parcel north of 9 Highland Avenue and east of State Route No. 330, between said 10 City and the State of California, acting by and through its 11 Department of Transportation, and the Stubblefield Construction 12 Co. , a copy of which agreement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit 13 "A" and incorporated herein by reference as fully as though set 14 forth at length. 15 SECTION 2. The agreement shall not take effect until 16 fully signed and executed by all parties. The City shall not be 17 obligated hereunder unless and until the agreement is fully 18 executed and no oral agreement relating thereto shall be implied 19 or authorized. 20 SECTION 3. The authorization to execute the above- 21 referenced agreement is rescinded if the parties to the agreement 22 fail to execute it within ninety (90) days of the passage of this 23 resolution. 24 25 26 27 28 2-08-93 ac U: k�UrnUAIZINU LAhcU'TIUN Ur AURLEMENT WITH STUBBLEFIELD CONSTRUCTION CO. RELATING TO ACCESS FOR PARCEL EAST OF STATE ROUTE 330. i I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 2 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 3 Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the 4 day of 1993, by the following vote, to-wit: 5 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 6 ESTRADA 7 REILLY 8 HERNANDEZ 9 MAUDSLEY 10 MINOR 11 POPE-LUDLAM 12 MILLER 13 14 Rachel Clark, City Clerk 15 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this 16 1993. day of , 17 18 W. R. Holcomb, Mayor 19 City of San Bernardino Approved as to form 20 and legal content: 21 James F. Penman City Attorney 22 23 B Al2,74 An,-r,"cJ 24 25 26 27 28 _ 2 _ RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Mark A. Ostoich, Esq. GRESHAM, VARNER, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN 600 N. Arrowhead Avenue Suite 300 San Bernardino, CA 92401 AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into on 1992, among the State of California Department of Transportation, "CalTrans"), the City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation, ("City") and Stubblefield Construction Company, a California corporation, ("Developer"). RECITALS A. CalTrans has jurisdiction of and is in the process of improving certain portions of Route 30, in the municipal limits of the City, as part of State Highway Project CU08201, EA157901 for Route 30 ("State Highway Project"). B. Under a pending agreement between CalTrans and the Developer, CalTrans is reserving and will improve a non-exclusive easement for utility and emergency access purposes ("Secondary Access Road") in the area depicted in Exhibit "A". The Secondary Access Road will provide utility and emergency access to and from certain contiguous real property owned by the Developer ("Developer's Property") and Route 30. C. In connection with the State Highway Project, CalTrans will also improve and dedicate to the City parts of former Route 30 which are depicted in Exhibit "B" ("East Frontage Road"). The East Frontage Road will provide access to and from the Developer's Property and Highland Avenue. D. In order to facilitate the orderly development of the Developer's Property and the general health, welfare and safety of the citizens of the City, the parties wish to enter into this Agreement to provide for the maintenance of the East Frontage Road and the Secondary Access Road and also to provide for the recognition of the East Frontage Road and the Secondary Access Road by the City, as legal access to and from the Developer's Property. This Agreement is intended to memorialize the discussions of CalTrans, the City and the Developer at a meeting held in the City's City Hall on April 13, 1992. As between the City and the Developer and for the limited purpose of vesting the East Frontage Road and the Secondary Access Road as legal access to and from the Developer's Property, this Agreement is also intended to be a Development Agreement within the meaning of Chapter 19.40 of the ✓ City's Development Code and Section 65864 et seq. of the California Government Code. 1 Cjffr Agrs`SC6 t OPERATIVE PROVISIONS 1. Improvement of Roads. CalTrans will improve the East Frontage Road and the Secondary Access Road, in accordance with the plans and specifications for the State Highway �p Project. 2. Dedication and Acceptance of Roads. Y (a) On completion of the improvements to the East Frontage Road, CalTrans will dedicate the East Frontage Road to the City, in fee, and the Ci will acre t the dedica t of the East Fronta a Road and will thereafter maintain the East ronta a oad to accordance with its maintenance standards tor dedi cated pub is s ree . ` f ,w.fi ✓ct c ,, y� -� `� tw«F-lijw.l6y 5��.•/ , L.�y:..�Xu,�G.wj..T�.:.� rH^.'.:`°'x*.(.4��,...✓wwPA (b) On completion of the improvements to the Secondary Access Road, C ITrans will dedicate the Seconds Access Road to the City, by a noncxcrosive easement " for utili purposes and emergency ingress an egress aril City wi accept e tcatio of [he Seco�rX Access oad and wrll thereafter maintain-me secondary Access oa m a manner hich will permit its use for unitty purposes and emergency secondary access.^ (c) Because the Developer will continue to own, manage and develop the Developer's Property in reliance on the status of the Fast Frontage Road and the Secondary Access Road as-lwl, conformin access to and from the Developer's Pro rty, as provided in paragraph 4. on , ce accepted, neither the st rontage Road nor the Secondary Access Road will be abandoned by the City, without the consent of the Developer. In addition, based on the same reliance by the Developer, the City will not delegate its obligation to maintain the East Fronta e Road or the Secondary Access Road wt t�ouf fFiFie�stgenf o e eve o r. S 3. Legal Status of Roads. The City ill recognize the East Frontage Road and the Secondary Access Road, as legal, conform' access to and from the Developer's Property, within the meaning of the aws of Cal' ornia and the City's Charter, Ordinances and Resolutions; provide owever, v 's Property is used for purposes which are H a consistant with the 's General Pla . I a rans wil recd a Secon Ac s Road as le co met enc Access to Route 30, under its Policy an it- o° rocedure No. w ich was issue on ul 9, 1 c di�rrA X7ty. 4. Development Agreement. 3 's� st_ //Z po—a� (a) To the extent that either the East Frontage Road or the Secondary Access Road do not conform in any respect to the laws of California or the City's Ordinances or Resolutions, then, as between the City and the Developer and for the limited purpose of vesting e st Fronta a Road and the Secondary Access Road as legal access to and from the Developer's Property, this r ill be deemed a Development Agreement withi mean ter 19.40 of the Ci 's Develo ment Code and Section 658 et se e a If0[na Government Code. AIZEiX (b) Without limiting the effect of subparagraph 5.(a), the parties acknowledge that the Developer intends to develop the Developer's Property in the future and that, in connection with any such development, the permitted uses of the Developer's Property, the density or intensity of use on the Developer's Property and the maximum size 2 GIT-AgrwIW and he of buildings on the Developer's Property will be governed by the development plan for uie beveloper s rope which is uTunatelV agreed to by the Developer and the City, ,i (c) The continued status of the East Frontage Road and the Secondary Access Road as legal, conforming access to and from the Developer's Property, will be su ject to satisfaction of the conditions which are described in Exhibit "C". /Y�i1?7 �,��,,� (d) As between the City and the Developer, this Agreement will be subject to amendment as follows: (i) Immaterial amendments to this Agreement may be made by agreement between the Developer and the Director of Planning and Building Services of the City. (ii) Material amendments to this Agreement will require the consent 4-". of the Developer, as well as approval by the City's Planning Commission and the City's City Council, following such investigations, findings and other procedures are are re uired b the laws of California and the City's Charter, Ordinances and Resolutions. q y 7 P� 5. Term. The term of this Agreement will commence on the date of entry into this Agreement and will continue for 50 years thereafter. 6. Covenant of Good Faith. The parties will cooperate with one another in good faith in the performance of this Agreement, so the intent of this Agreement can be attained. 7. Further Acts. Whenever and as often as it is requested to do so by any other party, each party will execute, acknowledge and deliver or cause to be executed, acknowledged and delivered, any and all such further documents as may be necessary, expedient or proper to achieve the intent of this Agreement. 8. Inurement. The rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement will inure to the benefit of and will bind their respective successors and assigns. Without limiting the effect of the foregoing, the Developer will have the right to assign its rights and delegate its obligations under this Agreement, in whole or in part, to any owner or owners of the Property. ,In addition, the provisions of this Agreement will constitute covenants running with the land as provided in the applicable law. 9. Construction. In all cases, the language in this Agreement will be construed simply, according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any party, it being agreed that the parties have participated in the preparation of this Agreement. Without limitin the effect of the foregoing, the parties acknowled a and agree that the City is restrict m its authority to lunit its o ice ower y contract and that the limrtations in this Agreement are inffn-d-ed to reserve to an ol its police powers which germ cn @2 T moment wi I be construed. contrary to iL stated terms if necessary, to reserve to the City all po ice power which cannot be restricted by contract 10. Severability. Every provision in this Agreement is and will be construed to be a separate and independent covenant and, if any provision in this Agreement or the application of the same is, to any extent, found to be invalid or unenforceable then the remainder of this Agreement or the application o t provision to circumstances other than those to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected by the same and each provision in this 3 UTnrsAgrtc\SI6 Agreement will be valid and will be enforced to the extent permitted by law and the parties will negotiate in good faith for such amendments to this Agreement as may be necessary to achieve its intent, notwithstanding the invalidity or unenforceability. 11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original for all purposes and all of the counterparts will constitute one and the same Agreement. 12. Attorneys' Fees. If legal action is taken to enforce or interpret any ProvismLin this Agreement, then the prevailing party in that action will ba entitled to recover f rh` osl� all attorneys fees, court costs and necessa dlsbursemepts m connection with that ac`lop.^ C�.P.etut CSY k,.u./,�/ , A�,6G.,K.¢c,.., aGJn,p/C.z` 13. Venue. Any legal action with regard to this Agreement will be brought, at the Developer's election, in either San Bernardino County Superior Court or in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 14. Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals in this Agreement are material and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth hereat. ' 15. Incorporation of Exhibits. The exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth hereat. 16. Recordation. No later than 10 days after the date of entry into this Agreement, the Developer will, at its cost, record this Agreement in the Official Records of the San Bernardino County Recorder. SIGNATURES FOLLOW 4 UT, Agaweanaa • CALTRANS State of California Department of Transportation By: Its: CITY City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation By: Its Mayor ATTEST lCity Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT o f A 1"'9 rt Attorney^, DEVELOPER Stubblefield Construction Company, a California corporation By: Its: • 5 QM�Aaawe.m+ a STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF ) On 19 before me . personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person (s) whose name (s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) , and that by his/her/their signature (s) on the instrument the person(s) , or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY, OF ) On 19 before me , personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name (s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) , and that by his/her/their signature (s) on the instrument the person(s) , or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF ) On 19_, before me personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person (s) whose name (s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) , and that by his/her/their signature (s) on the instrument the person(s) , or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State • -r �— - •mot Int ii AI f) EYHTBIT_.A'. - � ;:�-. .• ! ' : i i Original ^ ..\.'N 9,.. "full—scale" -exhibit?e 'SC on file at 1 the offices o'f - STUBBLEFIEM' � �`, \ �• CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ' J • =� ` -�� . cy ! � ' i- - I i rt i�f 11 .,•/, �I III �11 �1 / � ` f'' �jf 1 / _ Y i ai r J � • � /" % i is - I d';��� �: lt`t i�.i '!- 6 .91 t�� •, '' �, P .,�, j •. -' i� 7�• �_ °J •ft/r` r:. y�+. 1r.�_1I l ,\ \ ��I..�_ Q 1 .�' 11 .�+ i s `c•�-� - I L c- .. �" r al a �C\�� �.'•��i�S iu„ @ 3 ' ; ll� t r+ , lt • .� , �.�. �; to ,}� �I-' �\I r �"'i �l � l '\ \ ^\'_t� = Fi� � � �+- • f 1 il't r . �ac \��\ t� •Fj5 - 1 ap ,. _ � �. � �:+1�1 � � +,f+J �.-�+I ;��� �, Tom.: �t ` oc 19 � { ,.�1�'• �j .fir -- .` ! « '� .ttL' 1 , \ ,t} a ;�^e•`�e•ti-.``\t'� �• •T ' ' I 'S• ��{� ':v:-�. i� it(��/���, � ^t _� � \ �7 y ._.. .�c` t''tt"'•`+3{<:.. . '1e� "�i ` SXIiIBIT "B " • � - 9. . � I r FI tl ; a��—i ice., .� Original •full–scale" zxhibit on fil ;- A .at the offices -� – of TUBRL .a iSOVCSION 00"ABY INV a , ✓ �r 7, i aA r ; I .. , . .� ,._ 5� 7�-, F �, 11'1• � t, , 1k ; 1 � Jr • al4A Rn,HG tiC I T Y O F a � _ ; ; an j)ernardino „ 0 E P A A T UEMT OE IIAX XIXO A X 0 1XIE 0 1X0 LEAVICf1 A L 8 0 0 0 H E r A i C P D 1 A E C T O A July 14 , 1992 Tom Parrish Stubblefield Development 2258 Bradford Avenue Highland, CA 92346 Dear Hr. Parrish: This letter is in follow-up to our meeting of Monday morning July 13 , 1992 , also attending this meeting was John Stubblefield, Arnold of Stubblefield, Will Wright-Fire Chief, Roger Hardgrave-Direr ring Public Works, Al Boughey-Director of Planning e Services. The meeting was for City staff to become better familiar with the 20+ acre site east of Route 330 and north of Highland Avenue. (Here after referred to as the site) The site, when developed, would normally be required to have two standard means of access as required by City Code Section 19.30.200 6. and Fire Code Section 10.207(a) (b) (c) and (f) . "6 . A tentative tract or parcel map shall provide for at least two different standard routes for ingress and egress. A standard route is a wdtdh of 24 !e dedicated to the City and has a minimum paved " (a) General. Fire apparatus access road shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions- Of this section. (b) Where required. Fire apparatus access road shall be required for every building hereafter constructed when any portion Fire Department vehLiiclee more access. than 150 feet from Exceptions: 1 . When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the provision of this section may be modified. EXHIBIT "C" P(�E O S l A E E 1 S A X I f A X A A D � X 0 N 1 0 0 = A 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 . t t 1 1 I t [1 1 Tom Parrish July 14 , 1992 Page 2 2 . when access roadways cannot be installed due to topographic, waterways, non-negotiable grades or other similar condition, the Chief may require additional fire protection as specified in section 10.301(b) . 3 . When there are not more than two group R division three or group K occupancies, the requirement of this section may be modified, provided in the opinion of the Chief, fire fighting or rescue operations would not be impaired. More than one fire apparatus road maybe required when it is determined by the Chief that the access by single road maybe impaired by vehicle congestion, conditions of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. (c) Width. The unobstructed width of fire apparatus access road should not be less than 20 feet. (f) Surface. Fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of firs apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all weather driving capabilities.* it is generally the developers responsibility to provide all required access roads as part of the developosxt. The subject site is unique in that a deep ravine runs svrth to south along the east side of the site and Rome 3" (aqn b@dJg upgraded to freeway limited access standards) r11as &LOW ON Vast side of the site. The principal access is lens the southt and because of a grade differential between the sits and Routs 3" and the ravine a second access route from the east and the asst is impractical if not impossible. Access r the north is also limited because of Route 330 prohibits regular sI t iaberssotion access. These constraints leave the site with anU the ssaR6 as the location for a standard route of ingress and egress. Given the site constraints either the site resales undeveloped or a second or secondary non-standard ingress and egress is agreed to that ensures public safety and comes as close as possible to providing two different standard routes for ingress and egress of a development. The following is the a minimum conditions for providing two different routes of ingress and egress recommended by staff. Tom Parrish July 14 , 1992 Page 3 A. Standard Route. Principal (standard) ingress and egress will be provided by a dedicated street (constructed to the City standards) from Highland Avenue north to a turnaround (cul-de- sac) at the south end of the site. Note: Caltrans is constructing this street and dedicating it to the City of San Bernardino. B. Second ingress and egress route. As mitigation for not being able to provide a standard second route, two less than fully standard routes are being proposed. 1. A tunnel under Route 330 is being constructed approximately due west of the cul-de-sac and will connect to the west frontage road of Route 330. Conditions of Understanding; a. This tunnel is being built by Caltrans as part of upgrading Route 330. The tunnel is being built to Fire Department specification in terms of height and width. b. The approaches to the tunnal and bottom of the tunnel must be maintained by , Sd for emergency ingress meaning free of obstruction sack as rocks, &mile, trees, gullies of such a size to grsvvOut Of the public and Fire Department th an emergency. Free of obstruction hoverer doss not prevent the owner of the site from limitbW the use of the access as long as the smsrgsmW eoassm is maintained by means of Fire Department lockbomss, etc. 2 . Provide a twenty four (24) foot wide emergency access road from the cul-de-sac along the east aide of the upgraded Route 330 to the north where the fire service road enters Route 330. Conditions of Understanding; a. This road is to be constructed by Caltrans. The emergency access road surface will be native material (decomposed granite, sand, etc') on a stabilized base of a structural strength adequate to support Fire Department vehicles. Tom Parrish July 14 , 1992 Page 4 b. The northern most section of the emergency access road owned by Caltrans will dedicated to the owner of the site. C . The owner of the site will record an emergency access easement dedicated to emergency use corresponding to the entire length of the emergency access road. d. Upon completion of Route 330 upgrade a turnoff from Route 330 (an ice/snow chainup area) will be constructed by Caltrans at the location which corresponds with the northern most end of the emergency access road. The Caltrans Route 330 Agreement with the City acknowledges that the City has the right to cut/remove this fence in case of an emergency. The repair of the fence in the event of emergency use of the access by the City will be the responsibility of the City. Fence posts of the fence separating Route 300 from private property will be located so as to not be in the middle of emergency access. e. Emergency access road must be maintained by the owners of the site in such a oaaditiam t o '"t public and Fire Department vehicles access is case of an emergency (maintained meaning fret of obstructions the same as indicated for the tunnel access) - Item B.l.b. ) . C. other Mitigation. The following mitigations are required at the tins of project approval of the site and are higher standards than the standards contained in Chapter 19.15 of the Cityts Development Code entitled Foothill Fire Zone overlay District. 1. Develop a fire model of the site for the pn=pose of determining the extent of the fuel modifications none and if the fuel modification standards as set forth in San Bernardino Municipal Code Section 19.15.020 6. V. are adequate. Standard provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zone will be required as a Condition of Approval of a project on the site. 2 . Install fire sprinklers in all buildings of any future development. D. other Reouirements. All other development standards are those Tom Parrish . July 14 , 1992 Page 5 in existence and applicable at the time the project is deemed complete to begin Planning/Land Use approval process and/or at the time of filing for building code technical plan check leading to the issuance of a building permit. Staff believes that the above' conditions provides adequate public safety and meets the intent of City Code Sections requiring two standard routes from any development. At this point staff recommendations must be incorporated into a draft agreement and approved by the Common Council. The Public Works Department is responsible for coordinating the agreement with Caltrans and contractual consistency. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (714) 784-5057 . Y rely,/7 E. Reed, Assistant Director Planning and Building Services cc: Shaun Clark City Administrator James Penman City Attorney Al Boughey, Director Planning and Building Services Will Wright, Fire Chief Roger Hardgrave, Director Public Works/Engineering Henry Empeno, Deputy City Attorney Attorney's Office c LER:das �?P � r r ,n,� • -�3 Y° .x.,�^d.„+ '� � ::vr d > �. t try ,r �. { F A may." ��n � r � �}n�t, Ea � s '. e S+ r s Lrq +T at 7w`•' a��yy�'kG^f r .` �,irJ'YY•n�'rI. i �� }t?3� �'.. ,v�.. �4�. Tom{:•}; �t _. . f. tf-4"�Ciy��+v e �*�.. `t 'roai' �' �'.'�'R'R °� +�Y'"£ t ,V�� Y Q.�i.e R i ,� ss.-n,� a *w,'•z +rL'i � '9't�ty� 3� �r� ?'{gd�`3si'Ip'y�,,,.•�Y��,-y •et � s� � o- >,� •sf �S15aFas� S tt.f ' �` g�y ..� „v vv' �i•4a< 3P2 c a a a .a tj" ��X�t y. -v r5 w� •� � w+"" �' `~J'•.±!`ia �ti'. t.. f&yv 4 ta. i�x;s ri,�`�(yaC t>.��'v%t r`M i x"�b' -sz t�P,t,V��'y w q�x�a7 e F' V v4 c� ,nt,, 3�; �t �fi h�y''`.fi�}l s'"Y e ts Ya a r 1v.z �4 5.�fir,�i'�v•dv�,�t�a {k'.q}�' 4�3�a K s x�G S...;�w+�� p,� .s Pa NV V 47 1 wn s I 7 1 �'•r A.txY v v.�9���}. k i 3 �x S4.�fy n A � •.4. ; PNI rt n zq^i xC Ct 5t'e. tfr Sit:y t ,�� M.Y gvii '' r N F'1Kyi 'File" F .i'� �!` { 's4�s.�t ���.?s"4� �' � r' f1° yx �1 ul'.y �ctx,.#*Nr i�r¢}}nx. '-J' N+. s r,;,'t-` •v k '�7i. f ♦ ai� Yh a �' � F'�' •fy.Tp t 7r31 > 'I ' !"t .s'.` »`" '�,-a„'...4 Z*^, .•. �Yt-\r,dd' t�A,,,...a �S'ta,OY,'m4 nv-vN` info r3r ''nt3 ' �. G t-°L 2y t^�i invt„yYt i h.V' ^X:4 aw�+'rU� ,a 'y X" '}t .1 e c !r}, > �'Y L.`'k" t < k >• S e. 1� i I+ RN";,�,+.�y'� � Y a .l y r i r'�+' '3'+test ,cis, > :+�, .t. 'iMr rfG'A,ir ;yy aYYS f� ..s, Svj " "r r 1,+. rr."}4�, rn`e»+ } i '` y y lal- �ay '$•�Qt"k'yd lz wk .. �t ```�S�b'� _: a'*.e<S' is��4#`'M� xh = " � �. s6'�4 a '. •, ..Kts'_ ��' !� �V IS , ,o LO f NOTE: All measurements, boundriea t'o�• p�p c de-icted areas of this map are ap_roximated for illustration M O purpcses only. � n w.a Ha AG [Cpla4f Ic yy 55 •a of �v wd Yes do — — � r]/c�� ' \ ■ 1 o 3� , e p,� ��T . i ^ • r .\ O t la ..Y.• n t U � •.'O MO e • i >17> • ' • - •�I Me Y a '^r T9 MO 11014 wr 6b w il 1 fA d oa� 42 7 4 104 • (Draft Compilation Only) • CITY INITIATED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND CONSIDERATIONS STUBBLEFIELD PROPERTY PARCELS A,B,C, D,E AND F MONDAY,JULY 15, 1991 Stubblefield Existing Existing City Amended Property Acres General Plan DU's General Plan DU's Parcel A* 120 17.1 RL 120 Parcel B* 62 8.9 RL 192 Parcel C* 37 5.3 RL 114 Parcel D* 44 6.3 RU-1 67 MO.HO. 1 • Parcel E** 20 90.0 RS 4.5 480 Parcel F*** (Highland Avenue Commercial "Off-Site"Street improvements) Total 283 Acres 128 DU's 973 DU's a CITY INCREASED DENSITY 766% (See attached City Map Parcels A,B,C,D,E and F of Sutbblefield Property) * Existing City General Plan: One (1)DU per seven (7)acres City Amended General Plan: 128 Single Family DU's increased to 973 DU's Council Motion July 15, 1991 Increase: 845 DU's or 766% (Includes 480 High Density Apartments) (Source: City Council Meeting Monday,July 15, 1991 Considerations: Reduction of City Development Fees ** Existing City General Plan: Four point five(4.5) Single Family DU's per acre City Amended General Plan: 90 Single Family DU's increased to 480 High Density Apartments Council Motion July 15, 1991 Increase: 390 DU's at 24 Apartments per acre • (Source: City Council Mewing Monday,July 15, 199 1) Considerations: Reduction of City Development Fees *** City added consideration: Highland Avenue Commercial "Off-Site" Street Improvements (Source: Friday, August 2, 1991) Consideration: Reduction of City Development Fees _ G fv M } p <' i4• Y[ a „x. r .<„ �g � .f'i - �W rr ` •x Y.�S xa r' y _ 5r �. ,°M1a Y4iv Y�P�jy'9 ks�� {.,Y y' �} �rlfil' ♦ i '� +r." `� Y r-'Iliy"� ��{}' '`A'F�6'!fhSGa .ly.. 't,. aT,• . q x a w.F° s_ 4aTi' - r +br Aj®R z.y. �" >'�' 4l Y" f � }• .S�'�� ,.+,+r,� ri >• k r �` .n'(a'i}c 8`A..' _ ° w i��`� ��h �"�hY. -�''• �� � A% Kt<x•E ��"j � �'T' •� S�:SR.,�s.`�i�� � i* ` � y� "'r xk . _` �s � . �sti , .x i'{ s �s;�. t, "a � '� y�a •., +3�s�WM AM Nm 2•s r . G? ::. a t t }�•45K�?�•s' �'�'g+�+�� y�}s3 �. 3' a Y� Rx. .�i'g# P"'"'^dr'k•°bb'3'.ri .�e��7 v 4',6 t }-�x"*�l r S.�i��,�: r++��, � ��7'��, Yw'f'y.�'r A t � f 'sY ^�m a 'd °Y�.�Y•L'5��'�+ii'•i#'�` rY 5 �` 1 r�'•}� S�' Cyr.,�•+2�{+• y �7 f` rr, .dn _ ,,F � Y: +. .3u { `. •` five, r 2yA,- a-Y�gF_-4 4 r, Y+ 1§ y .* +a` 4 '< ,r H .i . nom ' A�J�L. ti F .•, r \• "d5 ,.�yg�ati++,�.cti•,�4.. Shy:, �'{x{5• s•� �q ,��a.�,s�t "$�S '�7 � It� �#�r7 - y � ��a,��".���'��Y`Sa� as � yF'y � < 'k`. � 1� ��+' i'S„��,�n��e'���'r�F, 3�§.X'nc�_��'� ` � tr, •x 'r+fi �j,. •}riC. x�ur � ��.LCs,r`,C'14i•&irFy r�;+.L+,�'��'S� f '� t' ��yx',rL'��."'s �. 3'`f.b s .. r Yom,+ � `yam' .; "�� zc `� `7aTY a5 1 'Y75iYsh ��s dr r;X. 1.+ F ivr k 'T`'cfk \ n ...rjn' .'�s sis'.Bxr , ' -,r +'" �'� `5 ixrK•0 i nn 't�i�-fib t., •e- wt w t w � .+. S i � P Yr s•t. s S i3-v 3 f -Y p Xaa .r. {�' !� rs?1'rs4 ,,,,� �,•w+-. r y'.R.s k �7rt b ar.y. R x \ `;r .-h Y? >Y.1srrF}' a4 F=t r' WN r �.q. ,xr� s y;- *+ .3^fi:Ft�"s.,F. x� •�a •?mow^�>:.a •C 'Y'A`r .skaz'wy,i��n r.- a1.4 7YEy� ry'� r+ �a x h lr4 iii ^•- ` ti} � #�. y ,y mfr t ``x- ', Y �, ,�i ,et. ly '." + f�'¢r4 S �v' b S' 4 h' Yd••F j' . .£J-vk rah rlil 'f�EZ+ �>R i a^t `E+ Y•yti' •'•'`3as $'?i -kr�7x' " `�l ss�j.Snv t +qi"[ "�°'"-SZk*vy�r� f 4.e 1 �.i •' S�.i�ly L X ?✓i'f !�i\ `.�jt: � S tarn�P•I � •���4R�.a,t�r�•�)f ,sex' Xi�''.c'+�.� a§v -.'Y'n+ •F4\ k $t 5 .s.s�j• .. s'Ce i i"Y�)� r r,'�' w:•i'Sk„•.r,+. s1 • ,i rir i s.erT.".•Z+�.ys.. x� 4 •'w..r argf^e av M1Y •-r: �a 6 "J S tiQi s .Fv6tit E..s • :'i +•mT{a.a.'�i` sxv'/`c�' iy s�.w�rka' . cx�-' re .t�x'�� �i. `:g 1;. 2L� h s; �wu + " '� �'w .a.,sry,✓w, r'*-7$N '� .E.E.vr w°, ,c. ry yrr r <a" ;y'°r y £.. .b r7 .• �'' �'6.t ..r r;,•'sr x3.°r ; �t- xa 'ACM, , r J � •. All"# 4 Y $£+a t a` +`T.J' sV d�` t (,i [ih��•'' [ � � T{ Y ,ms's +•.�„x,��7�u -f �I�y a ' k'""� a " �� k a. L ,fir • ,, ' c s 3Th�jP,,Zti.40.v �w Yr• 'i �4 ��yx•- �t?yv. s •l .�,�,+4k��n°y �� e� ) .hP �7,r,}, xnra � v+Lfe+�".:Y9" F b { !•yl*-0 y \ + _a ` '�°` d� ipCr+ ay^ i� ° % � ?�.[ aTt'�. ye.��4s.. .�f. �� � ;�x �'6. � as. f� .b•�k J kSy h�✓ 1�. fr y >5:,� t �y�f�F�+�`, � II`.}'\`gT. � . cyCt yN' st3� v .'iN M . ��n�� � J COUNCIL SUMMARY AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL MONDAY, JULY 15, 1991 - 8:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: CLOSED SESSIONS 1. The Mayor and Common Council and Community Development Commission will recess to closed session for the following: a. to give instruction to the City's/Commission' s negotiator on the purchase of property pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 .8. The real property which the negotiations concern is generally located at: b. to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; C. to meet with designated representatives regarding labor relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. 6; d. to confer with the Chief of Police on matters posing a threat to the security of public buildings or a threat to the public 's right of access to public services or public facilities pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; e. to confer with the attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 .9 (b) (1) , as there is significant exposure to litigation; f. to confer with the attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 . 9(c) , so that Council/Commission may decide whether to initiate litigation; 1 7/15/91 a g. to confer with the attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally to which the City is a party pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) as follows: City of San Bernardino vs San Bernardino Baseball Club. Inc. - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 239193; Stubblefield Construction Company, et al vs . City of San Bernardino, et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 242998; San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 252058; Sock Dawson et al vs City of San Bernardino, et al- United States District Court Case No. SA 88-461 AHS (RWRx) ; City of Redlands vs Inland Valley Development Agency. et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 255222; County vs City of San Bernardino (RDA1 - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 258241; City of San Bernardino vs . San Manuel Band of Mission Indians , et al - United States District Court - Case No. 85- 6899 W.IR (Bx City of San Bernardino vs . Dykes - San Bernardino Superior ;a Court Case No. 254883; Saab vs City of San Bernardino - Fourth District Court of Appeals Case No. EOO8652; Zaharopoulos vs City of San Bernardino - United States District Court - Case No. SACV 90-519 RWR; City of San Bernardino vs. Patrick Media/Gannett Outdoor, et al - Riverside Superior Court Case No. 205749; Thompson Keith vs. City of San Bernardino - Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District - Case No. E007275; Bowden et al vs . Hobbs/City, et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 255302; Randall vs . City of San Bernardino - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 250472; DeTinne vs . City of San Bernardino - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 255881. END OF CLOSED SESSION 2 7/15/91 37 . Proposed amendment to Development Code to incorporate cluster development standards . (See Attached) I' • NOTE: This proposed amendment is a result of Council action -aken at the May 20, 1991 meeting which continuci General Plan Amendment No. 90-14B. OTIO T at the yor and C on Council ect plane' taff to prepa an ordina ame t Dev opme t C e as appro late o orpor e ovisio s y whic c stet de opments may occur. MOTION: That the matter be tabled, and that Planning staff be directed to arrange for a workshop concerning -e cluster development standards. 38. Proposed General Plan Amendment - 29 acres north of 28th Street, east of Michelle Lane and west of Seine Avenue. (See Attached) �OTIO hat staf, a directed to initiate Ge eral Plan Amendmdnt i the ar generally scrib d as ap oximat ly 2 acre loc d no h of th reet, ast Miche e e and st Seine Avenue t City of Sa Bernardin o increase the d s ' y, but to etain the single family design aon. MOTION: hat staff be directed to initiate a General Plan Amendment in the area generally described as approximately 37 acres at the northerly terminus of Citrus and La Praix and 182 acres to the north of that property; and 44 acres north of the existing Mountain Shadows Mobile Home Park in the City of San Bernardino to increase the density, but to retain the single family designation; and approximately 20 acres east of City Creek Road, north of Highland Avenue, in the City of San Bernardino, with a multi-family designation. END OF PLANNING MATTERS 39. Adjournment. MOTION: That the meeting be adjourned to Friday, July 19 , 1991 at 11:00 a.m. , in the MIC Room. 16 7/15/91 w. .t y t�a� `, +� ya �,y,4£* � ¢..d ° e7�ky x���J .N.�� �p ec' �` �i. •e�. v �� �,�w ;H. }�i +^T�.. � ��.�p �. "k �• c j Ft 'z•��'+ry�'' 4E��,�n.i'jk,`�•�` +�. Wig: �� �.y�` '.y*. � .y)�y �$ �,x' * ,Ik+"�u� 4 �''s '� � �5 r.,.ph� ¢€..'R�,-F.• *�r �X'4rc�' 'v Y.. wnu a Tk� #. { r'�f Y'� �fY. tI' �� G ,�y�^. E � 4�4T` ,4�s�y'l0 V}�+ �F�P..• L�i3a �+y��'�ty �'3"T:.N . 'p �r t.•''+a`C�^Fe ,11gi, za `�i ..x /' "�' �.�'''. ,e-Y"' SY „' ?✓'` y "�y"8 y �y.; s µ rig, `' }p ♦ J n a .fp: ,.R VSN rz i � ,����� �d4, ��41'4�n x Y';' � '.� T X '2�bs° , `R�}c"X �' y' .�.�✓\c�+F' ���S.�ug x� ,� Yz�t. �' all ^ 7r « ..-x',G'a• -QV n MIR a I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) SS 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) 3 I, Rachel &rasney, City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached copy of the July 15, 1991 4 Minutes of the Mayor and Common Council Meeting is a full, true and correct copy of that now on file in this office. 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the 6 official seal of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino this 14th day of August, 1992. 7 8 RACHEL Pa ASNEY City Clerk 9 By De y Ll. -'Q- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I 28 • MINUTES MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL • OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REGULAR MEETING JULY 15, 1991 COUNCIL CHAMBERS The regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino was called to order by Mayor Holcomb at 8:35 a.m. , Monday, July 15, 1991, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North •D• Street, San Bernardino, California. ROLL CALL Roll call was taken by City Clerk Rrasney with the following being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Pope-Ludlam, Miller; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Rrasney, City Administrator�d sent: Council Members Hernan ez, Maudsley, Minor. RECESS MEETING - CLOSED SESSION (1) At 8:35 a.m. , the Mayor and Common Council and Community Development Commission recessed to closed session for the following: a. to give instruction to the City' s/Commission's negotiator on the purchase of property pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. The real property which the negotiations concern is generally located at: b. to consider personnel matters ,pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; C. to meet with designated representatives regarding labor relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 .6; d. to confer with the Chief of Police on matters posing a threat to the security of public buildings or a threat to the public's right of access to public services or public facilities pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; e. to confer with the attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 .9(b) (1) , as there is significant exposure to litigation; 1 7/15/91 mom f. to confer with the attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 .9(c) , so that Council/Commission may decide • whether to initiate litigation; g, to confer with the attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally to which the City is a party pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) as follows: City of San Bernardino vs San Bernardino Baseball Club Inc. - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 239193; Stubblefield Construction Comoanv et al vs . City of San Bernardino, et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 242998; San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 252058; Sock Dawson et al vs City of San Bernardino, et al- United States District Court Case No. SA 88-461 AHS (RWRx) ; City of Redlands vs Inland Valley Development Agency, et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 255222; County vs City of San Bernardino (RDA-1 - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 258241; City of San Bernardino vs. San Manuel Band of Mission a Indians , et al - United States District Court - Case No. 85- 6899 WJR (Bx) ; City of San Bernardino vs. Dykes - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 254883; Saab vs City of San Bernardino - Fourth District Court of Appeals Case No. EOO8652; Zaharopoulos vs . City of San Bernardino - United States District Court - Case No. SACV 90-519 RWR; City of San Bernardino vs. Patrick Media/Gannett Outdoor, et al - Riverside Superior Court Case No. 205749; Thompson Keith vs. City of San Bernardino - Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District - Case No. E007275; • Bowden et al vs . Hobbs/City, et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 255302; Randall vs . City of San Bernardino - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 250472; 2 7/15/91 DeTinne vs. City of San Bernardino - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 255881. CLOSED SESSION At 8:35 a.m. , Mayor Holcomb called the closed session to order in the conference room of the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North •D• Street, San Bernardino, California. ROLL CALL Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasney with the following being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Pope-Ludlam, Miller; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Krasney, City Administrator Edwins. Absent: Council Members Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor. Also present: Diane Roth, Deputy City Attorney; Margaret Scroggin, Administrative Operations Supervisor, City Attorney's Office; Bernard Kersey, General Manager, Municipal Water Department. READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Deputy City Clerk Vale read the titles of all the resolutions and ordinances on- the regular, supplemental, addendum supplemental and Community Development Commission agendas while the Council was in closed session. BERNARD KERSEY, GENERAL MANAGER, SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT EXCUSED S At 8:42 a.m. , Bernard Kersey, General Manager, San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, left the closed session. GENE KLATT, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ARRIVED At 8:50 a.m. , Gene Klatt, Assistant City Engineer, Public i ' Works Department, arrived at the closed session. GENE KLATT, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER,. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT EXCUSED At 9:02 a.m. , Gene Klatt, Assistant City Engineer, Public - Works Department, left the closed session. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY ROTH EXCUSED At 9:18 a.m. , Deputy City Attorney Roth left the closed session. COUNCIL MEMBER MILLER EXCUSED At 9:20 a.m. , Council Member Miller left the closed session. ADJOURN CLOSED SESSION At 9:25 a.m. , the closed session adjourned to the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino. 3 7/15/91 the priority of all Public Works projects in the City, and that a financial report be presented relating to project cost and the funding sources. The Council expressed concern that all city residents were paying for local residential streets. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, to approve the compromise agreement for Assessment District No. 987, Verdemont Area, in principle, as outlined above, and that it be continued to July 19, 1991, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET . IMPROVEMENTS IN VERDEMONT AREA- APPROVAL OF PLANS AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - CONTINUED FROM JUNE 17, 1991 (30) This is the time and place continued to for consideration of construction of street improvements in the Verdemont Area. In a memorandum dated May 28, 1991, Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, reported that the plans for installation of street improvements have been prepared and the project is ready to be advertised for bids. The project consists 'of installing sewer mains, paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalk and street lights on Irvington Street (south side) Pine Avenue to 600 ' west; Irvington Avenue to -Olive Avenue to Palm Avenue; Irvington Avenue to Palm Avenue to Magnolia; and Magnolia ® Avenue to Belmont Avenue to Meyers Road. The total estimated project cost is $470,000. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that approval of plans and authorization to advertise for bids for street improvements in Verdemont, be continued to July 19, 1991, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - 29 ACRES NORTH OF 28TH STREET, EAST OF MICHELLE LANE AND WEST OF SEINE AVENUE (38) In a memorandum dated July 8, 1991, James F. Penman, City Attorney, stated that litigation had been filed against the City relating to action involving approximately 29 acres generally located north of 28th Street, east of Michelle Lane and west of Seine Avenue. After a jury trial, judgment was issued finding the City liable for damages. In an attempt to settle this litigation it is recommended that the City consider allowing the developer to develop the subject property at a somewhat increased single family density than currently allowed under the General Plan, but that the requirement for single-family 4P residences be retained. 27 7/15/91 Mayor Holcomb explained that in closed session a discussion was held relating to the General Plan Amendment for the Stubblefield property. Deputy City Attorney Empeno explained that the area to be included in the General Plan Amendment would require public hearings, and an environmental review. The area is generally described as approximately 37 acres at the northerly terminus of Citrus and La Praix, 182 acres to the north of that property. It is proposed to increase the density, but to retain the single family designation for 44 acres north of the existing Mountain Shadows Mobile Home Park; and that the approximately 20 acres east of City Creek Road, north of Highland Avenue, have a multi- family designation. Mayor Holcomb stated that the recommended General Plan Amendment was bein o it iag e at the recommendation o e C t t aAttorne wit w con itionm ) that no apartments s aut orze e i ; Envirosta Impact Report be conducted; 3 that there be an extension of moss a omes on t e existin mobile home subdivision, an that the iso ated peace east o t he new propose highway alignment going up the mountain be zone R-3. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Miller, and unanimously carried, that staff be directed to initiate a General Plan Amendment in the area is generally described as approximately 37 acres at the northerly terminus of Citrus and La Praix, 182 acres to the north of that property. It is proposed to increase the density, but to retain the single family designation for 44 acres north of the existing Mountain Shadows Mobile Home Park; and that the approximately 20 acres east of City Creek Road, north of Highland Avenue, have a multi- family designation. RES. 91-325 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A CONTRACT TO E. L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. FOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ON WATERMAN AVENUE, FROM MILL STREET TO FIFTH STREET. (S-3) CITY ATTORNEY PENMAN RETURNED At 3:47 p.m. , City Attorney Penman returned to the Council meeting and replaced Deputy City Attorney Empeno at the council table. CITY ADMINISTRATOR EDWINS RETURNED At 3:47 p.m. , City Administrator Edwins returned to the Council meeting and took her place at the council table. Council Member Pope-Ludlam made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, that said resolution be adopted. 28 7/15/91 .''�< -3;95 3+ � +. ♦� �,��. o-i� " 'v- '< W . .,}!r°'' . na ^ a a � yi' '' L > r y •f i F � .{'� 'l T iL. `d w4Y. � �t�ys,� ,yA� 'yy^j•5 r �'+r'i Y ` _.a .F.R r � � 6 � ° ef.` .pp y . •; y'F'- _ F 4.-.''?br �-�v+-iTa ✓F • � f.��y�� "k 8 ssr °r3.,° � < ,�� � • 5Y H' aK . x'a. � � ; c� � � nj�{y ay dE�'� 4 u e � r �ry' ✓ s. } .FTyf d.F 1'�w� M.+'" AW` _ L "�Y i„ a..•^ran .M�J y rn`{(� - JFG,,,AS`'S��.�'AYe 'y, ic•+ 4 "W z �' r*�S` x i s a ; .�'^y� }•° ',fiw �;t`,`r`��!}A ��� � .t".,- s 't s��.x'vw� iLsy� ���x_r^+,f'k�• �L 'k 4bgy`C� 'Y„�f�,�'-F��ty�xV�� �gQ� � .t y" � `Si:. . <�����. ^ 'rte, >�.pty��d ..�' �•,. y>. �� �` nE�v$ ��r. �"t�..,l>.}�.k�l 7M 4` s�r_! •t,' + �' i`�• <;>Z"°+r :°a ,�,q`s1f• Xaa�w.�, �` <d• a5.y�� rktkt � r Y '" � 't'' A �.sF•tJ'��t}.'�vya y1,a J lxy { fit�'a r k`�rk,"W"}� � 3 .'R .`'a"" �-. .!" ',1. �L('}y�up • ,} �aT+> R �f-��t�' 6'^F+!3 s'ff {5 � ^5 [Fil ?fr1" r � t ME •'4i�« [ y s F 1.w4 \ }A �C-f.}y� _ R ,. F 4* St f V r § 4 �C, yk °e '� `;'ima}= �w. J�^} �'¢ �+x �Y+1';`dry�`jiY 3'.�T3e.,�,a "}�i*+•. f s a,'S,,F�. �>;.�� R .•'1 x#Y*d L 'd�,t�{x� `. :�'I ' r't.��h'4#� �an���� r r ��^ �: � .(v{LfZ• y +,.'i", i yk S y - x f t '' Ti 14 .. .�*. .." xY"sa.+ ✓.'w. M" <4'S- € '4.zi'F " y .`a, s riagc < 5 �Y MPraa "•rvn,rwt7 r�s�nra..'9t�Y' •+ 4Y ,F{� °i 9 iN .. �F fit' R €lry!5"n<ua,�,t `fLy "''! L' `. * K'..FC'ayi > F.o e•'M` x s ''v $� .�^.y yTy��tfalz�'F r �t'�•a 'f�+� >t'dr�t✓`�v�XA'�''d" i s V�1�"R����"' rt 4w <?+• s->... eyf J+ Y'4's1., ; : ,,�`� �,:qn w � � �l�.�,� 'i' yrxa cP � �a�ii'2i"•L •a r M�Q� xw jaSF .g � �..a °�'�.�.'w'�.S•' a: �< ��a5. �A,�' '• ,� r�.�„a`J ,t �'ht� ' �'�i� �,''��_.w � /��HFY � i�_ STATE OF CAL*0AN1A—SUANESS. Ia ANS"TAYION AND MOUSING AGENCY GZMGE DEUFMEIIAN, Gow.no. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (a DISTRICT 1. P0. Ill SAN iRN ARDIN O). C A �:.G✓ V]IOl lot, (...1 001 4d October 19 , 1989 The Honorable W. R. Holcomb Mayor , City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Dear mayor Holcomb; The State is now in the final stages of preparing plans for construction of the Route 30/330 freeway from Arden to 5th Street . One of the major items to be completed prior to advertising this project is approval of revised freeway agreements with the Cities of San Bernardino and Highland . We transmitted drafts of the freeway agreement with the City of San Bernardino to your staff for review on June 27 , 1989. Your staff has since raised issue with some aspects of the draft freeway agreement and design features of the project relative to access to a proposed development north of Highland Avenue and east and west of the Route 330 alignment. The requests for access and frontage improvements made by the developer through the City staff are clearly adverse to State policy. We have had several meetings with your staff and the developer to try to reach agreement on these issues and get approval of the draft freeway agreement so that we can proceed with processing of the document. 4F The negotiations to date have met with little success to the point where we are now faced with a minimum 2-month delay in finalizing plans and advertising this project as a result of non-approval of the draft freeway agreement. Further delays in approving the draft freeway agreement could even jeopardize having funds available to construct this project which could result In shelving this project for an indeterminate amount of time. I would appreciate any help your office can provide in concluding the present impasse. It is not in the best interests of either the City or State to encounter further delays in construction of this much needed facility. Very truly yours, ORIGINAL SIGNLD 8( I�LN $ILLL[ KEN STEELE District Director RGPsbh bcc% RBest JMaloney WLeonard ,Sr . ✓ BKean TI ITI-1i P 111 t�i {5 § b .Non 1 M., EF WS sTfing. . Y?i lx.,.y i tit 4 + ' z x ix d C Jp ur t j eLJ Ya d t P�s2, 6_ N • r� ,S t x ij, 3 L t"c yai d H- C a �. onti : , - tt}za. kg 1 mU } �- • $S' Q r :q W a ..' y jM1} tx. RIM 'a� � � NINON y "'£' 1' ..1 t� at*� . r! ?# l'S �� N �vyrE': }°«i. � r� �y V C V s. >4 ��� Go _:�. Ei++# �s L L �i U L .�'.� J ° `o �' „5 d 3a �^ � r a� U_ I. 0 Gy =i �� N R O^ .L .^�. O� d_ L G G � �' � C C E f C F` L A �t'� i:a...0 rj G^� 6 y } �.x. _a,w d •d v �L }• = V 4a ODR �• t „ •G Y., C .�'. ..s.:.._.. � �'i�: L2�"" ar a t � m y} 4 1 cS c F L Y � 9 r _ x1 h S_ e4 m O . m 2; r a r S "b w l i p e e ? ■ � e K ( w � $2 2:\ \ y: t \\\ \ \ Alƒ - . � a . . . w • . 2 . • d' P i+ a yy[[ T i L �C � �ki� .l � �;y •t" � C. 3M 1 Via' 3 ac "Y E V T C O •r7 r >"it« v O 4 v x MITI N i s ` i�Wr' . `. t cL ass ®M• / 4" 1. N,:. • sunxw Ftiheeedy� �'� . P d .`� s'` d+`t. a e e . . ■ � \ j\ < � ' e \\ and E; l \\ ? E• eP`` "S xC"3ti � 'k_9r 0 t� a k 'i X a f3 Yw, q �� yx�� � f? • R •�.`�` � S Sys Y.' � � t R s c` i a ' Y > , r- � ACE �`t� W L u T + tYxx` L\ , QW, •Q R v_ Im� . '��- t ' � i; E4 x.y ti� x.�y��5ij.��`.. I E� x w t _�} 5 �„'�, ry y.<t •CU *asp i4ip, all r + r f#$ ' y T �d >d C o R C G W N J L' �a r; f� �+ T,• i m � y Q A T � L P t� r c. ``:� c E j �L 5F Z } C >+ ]i 3 . . .Say• t � .,- • • N G1 is A • v•1 G V N c • r Y } ��d �� l��l .Y' CJ r � R l Ua • + v m d G V �- µ � N c E c VET lap mm ;Iwo; TE h PE rS raG y;�•, a��f. i6 E` 2'`lf{:5.3.1 Sr s i y F i La ,ta,. a, AD CCI tl t, ti ,. 3fi dm a g, Y q { r ' Z7 i. }�f � d e ` �b 6� AF V ;e4�1 r „� �U 4 f n »c4�g If a^ 1 J y "gT"py, # It MOW a Alms T ♦t,o ��w 1 y V t6 .MOP ry � x R , "his c +$ i Ss `4 R aN 'A e7n �14 k c 'Ti web"� ♦ -' 3 1 C Y ti! ,K� l py`y. W e d C S sa r s A � vU � LY y°3y 9 ` � 'tc 2 �•1 F I C r: .fit- try I "u " yy Yn D ♦ �� �� �. F ♦/.�X `} `ice " _ is a s yy 4t; & ux 'F Y a 2 • < '4 <. eyv 4t .; X VA N� r a . 1 y y rJ i, C C L 3 W • n V N v 7� � ..•:s ^nor t�.?' 1 � n 4 r Iwo Jt ._> _. . , ... , , . .ice, ..:y 41� ► • a }e c A .�.� ypS •777 rµ•} ' �. FH y�,` � y'� f ���4 � y>� � rt ��f Yy •L �4y� aw C G G y • ' ��I � d4YlvYkiia 3 • � X t t 1 �x i t. •A u Fe mu �;�� .�� ;fie. '��" . "• ;. r e F rr O } t SQ, fg` 'k k i it �� � 4 7 Afy. � ..Y•`' • ' , ' � � " Mkt ';t V'C E Mk ' a` • , � a.�= � `. �� dam; i d !� 4 'k ty'f w�j C g,_. Arw All r a r ��..4b is G o ' c r ' d i S • y. .o-�w s E n L \ � n Ir i CO.r T.• :.. y-Y� a t �� P la+D � yn • ✓ f ' c • �' .t�i�. �� �� � "•ixv L • xx Y v io a jl. � � U•"'o t < v f •4([ 4 p a ,�-� - „ . � �, ,. • ,may v � fir. q� b'a t §s - •yse e. t r tE 6C !. .ut L w *yr { 1 •��� ti °•' 1e - e{� is:: s • `` may* ' l • �I. lid I II N W 4' E6 • F. L x ' � 3 n- ry, 40 5. S 22 G� d � "9 J � a— y v er • t k� a �§ � ;.� t E J � • py N 3 Th M, will Adz+ q� d A 'r a —� a 4 fit• � „� ''" � t > C' Lu Y q( 3 to C J O ": :ice! dye i Fj- S �. i l� iL • 41171 i"...� ' ,n < _ a e 4 I t E1 a r WI§slops m RaWli, g 4 + . ti s a •fit •. .a.' a u _ a a/�D y, ,..a• � �a ,_.. 315. 4� i e � . e . e 7 e } �: . . : �« � � ���� �� ^ � - � �����§ \ � \ °�� � : ����f - \ . e / � /��\\\ ) � 2 . . 2 /� . � ��w � } \ { �z > < - �d ��� � \ \ e . ° � ^�\ \ . } e . °�7 \ e � � \ \ \ � � < e \�} . � ) % � e � \ a Oak t t ( z it ♦ ..� .dam �-. C ( l�Y7� «�; 1 �: � �„ ' a Jf : G a or VW sc I 1 r or o 9 � b oil Y p j a 19 "t s w Y, b t ' e Y+Y F yt r f n J r, +F. 4 ' MR e C I w c R $yX L v TO WE S L^ C - i c z 1A y E p WASS ;4 Yr O $' IVA It-, 3 , f s. '2 < k n.e zt v � Fit: le '4 8 3t h • � N i f _ C �ryryl+ f �.ac� `4.. # T m + 1 6 • K N{...,'9 sY'9 i �fi, Y ♦ �� ry GY x ,y t Q t. C o c Y t W y ac+S y j P Ix 10, Cd AN I Fee, Ilk • d" �;M ., 4; � �-f, r�. ... � �, � „ .F .�:. ''�: ��. �� s� , - T „'s� a p � �� � r � T S � 9 :: 9 - C r. �. s ,.k'�� Y m '1 �� Y `F h �.'�� Qv �kj y i 'O'C . . l a :2 h. $�+hb .. � J ..:g � - �.� � q H� *F -: h ii' + aK� Y' ;�' 0_06 . ..� � _ x .6 1 <:F M ti �� F Y ! � �' OC. _�F _ �C 4 'k.. d � 9 ,.`�, C. �..� a ,fit .tS _ ; ' � � � x, X99 d G � ` V 9 f d Y � Si� e ..� C e: .. ._ F' �$' �� ( L :�rr� '» '��a. �� � _ �jS.., R_ � v :�� � -. .r y pl•� - .�; x is C _ � N� �8�, � _ _ '�*Y � k y e s .,� � ¢ . : .r- e � ■ % !£ e !/ » � k� !- < ® / | { \k � e -2 � \ « � y . � • \ � \ e » • • 1 i' rcva'�•� t a 3Y� i .�.� s 7a L W $g 1' d' n v"l t 9 • k > v t rf 4v t � W 5 1 r 1 9 y"g I� m m� fig ^ C • li N 11� rrc+ 1 yk ip.. U 6 J f I ':ri a a isY 9 c �+ ti s f" t: t 1i9.. "�•� riI • "�»`slFin 1 T ✓* a ' 1�1� O ♦ °'^ r.' d'v tq 0+ a`n J .U. f ga +f SB h r V U t a � y •x 9i Via. c ` j,. Ohl a xxti 'Y y ry"t 4 �a w m X { J f,�{., .:'� _ ro'iF Y+S b q k.�..��Y1l F"x'ki � Lc• { �_a'#.. q 4� C ��.y'`'��': r pR x'51... x.. '• 4 •. � +�:5 �' j��rvyY���.,� L4<C jj, �� f X •_ .p o- i y 5' �` A` � _ 1p • A x.'ti n VOW $o N x to Vt ME m Fs .. u S — L w b s _ r ,n An fill z c s \ t t � t si,7 �,6 t :M i. oF r w'•C ^i a YT w i •�A 2� UJ r 9+r t R"V r f H G I y OO C ✓.b n a ^N i' y r .. •dp -as `T tg 'a6 a.Ii� i i� 3 ut °`!•i .wiz ,: NY a q is AM jj TIM x7 5 rx y r - v y� 1 a . y� i f.�' � 1 a> 4 ✓�9 j t Y �± rJ 'Y�aRiA" .4s a. •T, 4 4< y."+ '✓ rbRa Fla J - tom_t YYYY `sY Z • R �Y i' r �r �f i a 7i t 8 W zg • LAWa; Cc LD .4 }R M G O pqp M R N5 3 a, 1 3a xh r �•'z an Y Vj 9 I ''.x '$�� .p arc q S4 4 � S$b' IF' 1i^ �.> V ♦ �14- � t n � ( �• C1 '�����+'��}q� 'xE3 Hx g� .��•} { -,7 4{ F R ..s a ZA p r T t yl .Q o� r � % Al t x o y e � ! e ` � - < 7 .� TA �TP \ \ � fP\ �) y# a s a +k Ii{ r wel UP! x s� n + a � i o• 1 h^ R� .°�*,'._ ;= +tia��`� k '?fit•�c sue. c t A V .n C fit. ' J » '.♦ x ,. 9 � d J � i Q } �•.�P .•i� .3 y : g l V J X t A' t 9 , i• in s 3 t y s % IC "^K^ 8 2�4 _ v � q r {F I , �• F Hz t 1 74 � ^t 1e4 r s r, d "Mi lot liP Vie, y r� 5 ,ri ! n r K t{S w: rt 5 r k k a �''" - "+YR• I ww t {. i 'V ♦ 3 .fir y¢�, "'t I RAISE' W7 4 I _Q t..:ll 9f Y "Mr�. P14 i a r sin N Y. !e (� � r.Y• l Wit. l •twit -kilt,x•. +�j i. ,Q L i •K" ,gi15r a �., �A 5w �x vµ -• y.y s 1-4, "KILO �ry '`yip wig k . of 41 , IL 4 _ ; 3 F _ t .r . yy,L• $,� � to� i*1 > ... �n y ! t F _ p Lu r` v 'R` Arai Vt AGO STS 4t d4 Y � 4 • • iif+ 3 + N d T u �y c • y L *a d h K (f y � 3� 3 • P �' 'g w S fit` RN _ i+c• ,..y 4 �` Sa r � t Alai • y • l �3 _ 1 • . ,_ z, . '� �' ``�. > : :� • ,� .a, r ;, � >! � � 'li L �L�.� �3�ii. R �ti•4M �� i.k i'��,. �. i (r � i � �{y I I�� r Y.'J. 1 Nb � `( I� �I q � rl b N T L C A �'i �' 1, I III �flip ��II { ` i � � t, s f� "R ii i' � � �� ,a ' .4 }� � S, t� t0 . � p C O i� #„ i G 2S J 5♦T � (� ..' � % t'�:�I � a � ��` �i � � C *'t a � U Rv '� x„ ,� Y" s A 7} � y 'i _ m '� � e„ v Y } J i i U x "S i� ^ y �� !j ' �� �j ;;,. y Y ,v- 't > ..�, 4� u ' + Y p 5A A�. H % yj t. (yam t `� �, �t•° S 4x�� �\•.lay, a��' W • 1 4 Y `�} -9^ x h'•¢''�. j r `�}Ql,f''v yam; �,�.k �!P rat J It •'i ��,+� ..wa` 2a7' "- :7� WARNER W. HODGDON y o HEART 6AA RANQ1.ARAOV2lIEAD S9RMGA , ,G r c 8/a6/y0, 9 OF4KE 1D%21K C: LM SAN SERII.ARDUlO.GIlWRN1A 92A06 mo 111-00 YF]EOOPY: t9upls-»�: March 22, 1993 Mayor and Common Council -2 993 4'� —,, City of San Bernardino >2�2 � � 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 /1 A-1 � RE: City/Stubblefield Agreement Primary/Secondary Access Rt. 330 Council Agenda Item 39 Dear Mayor and Common Council: The above referenced Agreement with the City/Stubblefield was first placed on the Council Supplemental Agenda Item S-3 February 15, 1993. It was continued from February 15, 1993 through March 8,-1993, March 15, 1993 to March 22, 1993. 1 have patiently sat through three all(lay meetings in order to address this issue and to question it's benefit and Public Purpose. Fast, the Primary/Secondary Access referenced to in the Agreement are Sub-Standard " to City Fire, Health and Safety Code and do not met the provision thereof. Secondly, these -_ access roads eastorwest of the Rt. 330 Freeway, which serve Stubblefield Property only,do not meet City Street Standards for acceptance as City roads, little alone the City 50 year maintenance responsibility of same under the Agreement. The liability to complete and bring these Roads and access into comvliance with acceptable City Street standards has been ��ted m cost $780.998.00to cost $780.998.00. Accepting these roads to any existing as is condition or future in principle commitment to accept Sub-Standard requirements and the approximately $800 ' thousand for City Road Dedication compliance, should not be a City liability. (See attached March 22, 1993 Road Access Cost Projections Rt.330 Frwway) On July 15, 19 Odd under Council Agenda Item 38, but not limited to, the City Attorney recommende2l that the City initiate an Amendment to the June 2, 1989 Updated General Plan for 480 High Density Apartments (24 DU's per acre) on the Stubblefield property east of Rt. 330 and along City Creek Canyon. The Council approved Mr. Penman's recommendation for the appropriate Public Process. The property in question is to be served by the Primary/Secondary access under this City/Stubblefield Access Agreement being asked to be approved in principle today. Consideration of Illegal access to City Code and acceptance of Roads that do not meet City Street Standards to this property should be done at the time of the pending General Plan Amendment Public Process. Another City/Stubblefield Agreement in principle to conflicting City Code and Standards is only asking for similar exposure to the $11.5 million Damages previously awarded. The City Attorney declines to sign this Agreement as to form and adequacy, and he is correct. I¢RITAGE OE THE MOUNTAINS AND VA Y aEG V 1850 OHEADQUARTERS:LOST OiHfE!OX M1 ,ARAOWFffAD SMOGS,SAN lERNARDDiO,GUJFORNIA 92tl RESIDENCE HARING:5295 no MOOR RDUEEVARD,SAN pERNA WO,UI➢i1R 92 w.M4)1810155 WW A iAlU4A..NOOLOOM —1--ARIILSTE • Page 2 (See attached March 10, 1993 City Interoffice Memorandum RE:Stubblefield Agreement) In addition, on July 13, 1992 the City was requested by Stubblefield to again start the process for a Rt. 330 Borrow Site and Grading Plan on their property in order to sell Fill • Material to Caltrans/Contractor for the Rt. 330 Freeway ($3 to $5 per cubic yard or $1.5 to $2.5 Million). This Borrow site west of the Rt. 330 had been going on with the City Attorney's office since before July 15, 1991. In fact, no Stubblefield Freeway Fill Material was ever required and/or by Caltrans/Contractor for the Freeway since June 1992 and this had been met by excess dirt graded from the Wal-Mart Site. By City letter dated July 14, 1992 Stubblefield then met with the City to also become more familiar with their 20 acres property east of Rt. 330 and along City Creek Canyon. The July 14, 1992 City letter is an Attached Exhibit to the proposed City/Stubblefield Access Agreement. The mass grading activity that occurred on Stubblefield property before and in May/June 1992, but for fate, would have been the cause of several fatalities and cost the lives * of one family or more, including children. By Stubblefield mixing their heavy equipment in along with the Caltrans/Contractor earth moving construction for the Rt. 330 Freeway, by the end of June 1992, Stubblefield completed massive grading over the contiguous twenty acres and the 480 High Density Apartment Site along City Creek Canyon. This included, but not limited to, the bull dozing of thousands of boulders and thousands of tons of material, debris and tree stumps over the cliff and directly into the City Creek Canyon Streambed. The streambed below is the Homeless Village built for several years and occupied by various families. Fortunately, one shelter plummeted in the early morning by giant boulders was not occupied by the parents and children normally there. • I addressed this serious matter in my February 15. 1993 letter overview and Photolog to the Mayor and Council and which I shall express to you for your full attention and for the public record today. As stated at the beginning of this letter, I have patiently sat through three full Council meeting only to have this matter repeatedly continued. I thank you in advance for patiently hearing and receiving the facts of this travesty. (See attached February 15, 1993 letter to Mayor and Common Council RE:Supplemental Agenda Item S-3) Respectfully, Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Mayor W.R."Bob"Holcomb Esther Estrada,Councilwoman Ralph Hernandez,Councilman Valerie Pope-Ludlam,Councilwoman Michael Maudsley,Councilman Tom Minor,Councilman Norine Miller,Councilwoman Jack Reilly,Councilman James F.Penman,City Attorney Shama Clark,City Administrator HERITAGE Of T¢MOUNTAINS AND VALLEY UGAN N 1150 ® OIKADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE WX 11".ARROVMAD WRINGS,SAN RERNARDWO,CAMXMA f3406 (I� RESIDENCE MAKING:3355 MIOADMOOR WU VARD,SAN RERNARDINO,CALMORMA 12d,(714)211 1153 A tAAMR•.IM1prppN TA y"am AmRjATE WF I WARNER W. HODGDON HF.., X t o s IOfi OFFICE!O%II« �N tE NA MND.(a -2547 February 15, 1993 (714)296` Mayor and Common Council �i�i�s 6/v'1 xe'A '-z City of San Bernardino �rynyx a> ea, ,e 300 North "D" Street J San Bernardino, California 92418 p «� RE: City Supplemental Agenda Items S-1 and S-3, February 15, 1993: Appropriate$200,000 from General Fund Reserve to City Attorney Budget RE: Outside Attomey(s) City/Stubblefield Agreement Rt. 330 Primary/Secondary Access Dear Mayor and Common Council: This letter is for clarification to the above February 15, 1993 Agenda items covering Stubblefield Mountain Shadows Primary/Secondary access Agreement, City Attorney Outside legal cost of $200,000 and submitted to the City Clerk for the Official Record. Earlier today I handed the Mayor and Common Council my letter of same date regarding Agenda item 32, Establishment of an Assessment District for Dedicated Sterling Avenue Primary and Bonita Vista Drive Secondary access. Said letter also addressed my being singled out by the City Attorney in the cause of action and allegations filed Friday,February 5, 1993 by Fish and Game- This covered the area of Sterling Heights and Highland Hills, which is immediately contiguous to the east of Stubblefield Mountain Shadows. It is ironic that the February 15, 1993 Supplemental Agenda Item S-3 request council authorization of an Agreement in which the City accepts a Primary and Substandard Secondary Road Access to Stubblefield Mountain Shadows Property east of the Rt. 330 Freeway and along City Creek Canyon. The City is asked to accept by Agreement full maintenance of the Roads, as they are relinquished by the state to the City, regardless of meeting full City standards and the Cost of compliance to the City. Through Mr. Empefio, the City Attorney wants a provision added to the Agreement for a $100 thousand credit toward any future Stubblefield Judgment against the City arising from the April 1991 $11.5 million damages the jury awarded Stubblefield. Mr. Empeno handles all City litigation, however,outside Counsel has now been retained in the Stubblefield matter. (See attached February 15, 1993 Supplemental hems S-1 and S-3) (See attached Cahrans Policy and Procedure No.90-04) (See attached February Supplemental Agenda item S-3,City Engineer 218193 memo. City Attomey 2110/93 memo and Agreement with maps and Planning 7/14/92 letter) On July 15, 1991 the City Attorney recommended that the council initiate a General Plan Amendment covering the Stubblefield Mountain Shadows 20 acre property and could be served by these roads now under the Agreement for 480 High Density (24 units per acre) apartments. It is not without coincidence that we were singled out by Mr. Emoeno and the lmUiAGE OF YF1E A10UNiADE AND VALLEY lEGAN DJ It30 OWADQUAa IE IOSr OFFICE b%21".Aaa�SMUNG5.SAN BEXKARDDJO,t:SIJtOpMA 92M IT FF90ENCE MAaWG:SHS noADM aOUlEV .SAN bFJINAADa10,CAISFO 92 W.(214)SOSOISS A i.LLMI V.MOOGLOM fA.mT QIWr AS}YIAT£ Page 2 pity Attorney in the Dedicated Sterling Avenue and RSA Hiehland Hills cause of action filed Friday!February 5. 1993 with Fish and Game. The Stubblefield attorney under the $11.5 million damages against the city also represents the Sterling Heights property owners. The same attorney filed a claim against the City in February 1992 as to the City handling of the Sterling Avenue and Foothill Drive Area property. The July 15, 1991 Council Agenda item 38 covered 29 acres of Stubblefield Mountain Shadows Property only. After the July 15, 1991 Executive Session Mr. EmpeBo represented the City Attorney's revised Agenda item 38 recommendation to the City Council for a Stubblefield Settlement Agreement. This covered, but not limited to, a City initiated General Plan Amendment to the City July 3, 1989 Updated General Plan, encompassing 283 Stubblefield foothill acres, a density increase of 766%, including 480 Mountain Shadow high Density Apartments along City Creek Canyon. (See attached July 15, 1991 Stubblefield Property Map and General Plan Amendment Compilations) (See attached July 15,1991 Council Agenda Item 38,29 acres only,Stubblefield) (See attached July 15, 1991 Certified minutes RE City Auomey's Recommendation of Stubblefield 283 acres) On January 14, 1988 a Writ of Mandate Action was filed against the City, Common Council and City Environmental Review Committee for approving 491 Apartments in this immediate area along City Creek on December 7, 1987. This was not an RSAC project, however, my family's legal council, Reid and Hellyer, voluntarily defended and held harmless the City, Common Council and ERC members and held them harmless. A Settlement Agreement and Dismissal was approved by the Superior Court July 3, 1989. On July 3, 1989 a Writ was filed on the City against it's new updated General Plan. At the request of the City Attorney, voluntarily my family's Legal Counsel again defended and held harmless the City. All matters were successfully Settled and Dismissed at no Cost or Loss to the City. RSAC (my family) absorbed over$500 thousand dollars in legal cost to successful defend the City and resolved the related matters. In July 1992 the City Attorneys office, through Mr. Empefto continued it's scheme for a Stubblefield Settlement. This included having the Planning Department process a misleading Borough Site/Grading Plan with Initial Study for the purpose of generating Rt. 330 Freeway Fill Material. However, all remaining Freeway Fill Material required was obtained from the Wal-Mart site development and completed in May 1992. There was never a need for a Stubblefield Borrow Site as RSAC Highland Hills Ranch had committed to provide the Freeway Fill Material at no cost in April 1989. The Stubblefield borrow site and grading plan was actually for 69 Mountain Shadows Mobile Home Lots and a new foothill road access.The goal was for them to be implemented prior to the approval for the July 15, 1991 Mountain Shadows City initiated General Plan Amendment, recommended by the City Attorney. At that time Stubblefield sale of Fill Material to the State at $3 to $5 per yard was contemplated by the City Attorney and Stubblefield. The City is now being asked to accept the Frontage Road on the east of the Rt. 330 Freeway and maintain it under a 50 year Development Agreement in favor of Stubblefield. It MartAGE OF TIDE MOUNTM AND VMUY REGAN w M5o [� OMADQUMTERS:POST OFFOE WX 21",AMOIr56AD SfR .SAN RERNM 0.CA560 92� �M1 RESIDENCE MAaING:Mf5 BROADMOOR WO VM .SAN aEMN FNO,C.UIfOR 725 ,91419"153 W/ A�AANEa�.xoocoon Eumr hour•rSUTArz Page 3 • is couched in the Agreement as Primary and Secondary access onto the Rt. 330 Freeway for any future density under the General Plan. Caltrans letter dated October 19. 1989 stated that the request for access and frontage improvements by the developer through City Staff are clearly adverse to State Policy. Freeway Funds will be put in jeopardy. The future density • for the Road access could include the 480 High Density Apartment property the City Attorney recommended for the City initiated General Plan Amendment on July 15, 1992. In and before May 1992, Stubblefield heavy equipment completed massive grading on this property and other Mountain Shadows property. Thousands of boulders and thousands of tons of related material, debris and tree stumps were bull-dozed over the cliff into the City Creek Canyon Streambed. (See attached Caltrans letter dated October 19, 1989 RE:Developer Access Adverse to State Policy) The upper piles of graded material crashed down onto several tents in the Homeless Village below, built in and along City Creek. Fortunately, there were no immediate deaths caused, as the Closest family with children,normally sleeping in their tent, were not there on the early morning the bulldozer began and boulders wiped out their shelter. The village has a commissary , no sanitary facilities, neat rock border paths from tent to tent, three generations of dogs, open fire heat and cooking. Of the multiple Wildfires along the RL 330 Freeway and Mountain Shadows there was also a City Creek fire recorded, put out by Fire authorities and named the Homeless Fire. • 1 respectfully submit that the City Attorney asking for a $100 thousand credit against the $11.5 million Stubblefield damages and by allowing this as the only provided economic consideration to the agreement requires added thought. The roads for City Acceptance and maintenance in perpetuity are on both the east and west side of Rt. 330. Does City acceptance include all prior cost to be paid by the State for, Curbs, Gutters, Streetlight, Landscaping, trees, irrigation, Fire hydrants, Signals and meeting standard City requirements, including cut slopes? It is my further understanding that the City Attorney and others have flown by helicopter over the entire foothill area from Sterling Heights east to Mobil's East Highland Ranch for complete surveillance, visual comprehension and photologs. This includes, but not limited to, the CDF-FP East Highlands Area Vegetation Management Program and Prescribed Bum which was implemented December 16, 1991. Enclosed herewith is the prior and ending June 15, 1992 Photologs of City Creek Canyon and the area west and east of the RL 330 Freeway. Prior RSAC Photologs of the State Rt. 330 Freeway construction in the City Creek Streambed with over one thousand eucalyptus, alder and Sycamore trees that were bull dozed down, have been given to the City Attorney in January 1992. Respectfully, Warner W. Hodgdon Shaun Clark,City Administrator Al Boughey,Director of Planning and Building Services James Penman,City Attorney Dan McKinney,Esq.Reid&Hellyer Lisa Visingardi,Esq.Reid&Hellyer • HERBAGE OF THE MOUNTANS AND VALLEY BEGAN N SW ((}}JJ O HEADQUARTERS:Mrr OFFICE BOX SIN,ARROW EM 9%24M,SAN BERNARDWO,GnFORMA f2N [l7 RESIDENCE MAMMN IVS BROMMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN RRNAMNO,CAUW MA 12N1,(11)113 153 A�ARNrA..NDDGppN rAAmrcaour ArNJArA i (� n WARNER W. HODGDON W H[AAT 6A0.MN0 A0.AOmHE D SPR NGS Posy orna wx 21u SAN aE1WARDiNO.GWfOANI.S 92.0E C1.)IS 1-1M2 17141291.1112 aa.99ax April 19, 1993 W.Henry Empeno Deputy City Attorney City of San Bernardino 300 North"D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 RE ERC/DRC Meeting April 15, 1993 Agenda Item 3,Tentative Tract 14112 Henry Empeno misleading comments and misrepresentation Dear Mr.Empefio: On April 15, 1993 the ERC/DRC unanimously voted to concur with Planning Staff recommendations relative to Agenda Item 3 referenced above. Enclosed herewith is Planning's letter dated April 15, 1993 in ratification thereof, and the April 15, 1993 ERC Final Agenda. The Sterling Heights SEIR, which included Dedicated Sterling Avenue, and Primary/Secondary Access, was prepared by City Consultant Tom Dodson & Associates. Comments received as to the SEIR were also responded to in writing by Tom Dodson & Associates. As you know Tom Dodson&Associates was retained by Planning after your and. ' W. Penman's concurrence on December 8, 1992. At that time, Sterling Heights and RSA (Secret Hollow Ranch) reconfirmed agreement to absorb 1/3 each for the cost thereof through an Assessment District Structure. (See aitarbed April 15,1993 Planning Lever to Sterling Heights RE:SUpplemenud SEIR and Coosultant Comments) (See marLod April 15. 1993 ERC/DRC Final Agenda RE Agenda Item 3) Following your testimony to the ERC and those present, RSA took concerned exception to your misrepresentations and misleading comments. Prior to your comments you distributed a black and white 81/2x11 copy of Orchard Hills Illustrative Plan contributed by RSA to the City, For Discussion Purposes Only, and an 81/2x11 page (Figure 33-1)from the former Woodland Heights Draft EIR and Specific Plan that had been in process by others,but never completed,prior to RSA acquisition on September 19, 1991. (See anxLed Orchard Fmis niustrzave Plan For.D==on Purposes Only) (See am-hed woodland Heights Figure 33-1 Plan from uncompleted Draft ER/Specific Plan Document) You pointed out Sterling Heights 56 lots and the City/EDA Little Sand Canyon 89 lots as delineated on the Orchard Hills Illustrative Plan prepared For Discussion Purposes Only. You then went on to allude that RSA planned to build Apartments on Secret Hollow Ranch and therefore wanted or benefited in some special way from Dedicated Sterling Avenue. You then elaborated by further comment, something about RSA feeling that 12AIiAGE Oi TI¢MOUNTAIIJS AND VALLEY aEG.w DI 1150 OIMADQUARTERk r OmQ w%21".Altlt M 4024GS.SAN aERNAADDIO,GIrOANL.f2.06 RFSIDENQ MMIING 129s noADMOOA w VAAD,SAN)E}NARDDIO,CAfrOAMA 93.M,rA.I aPJ-0ISl S��// •V^rt *W.MOOGOW II.M1T PIOIA A„IIIAT[ I Page 2 i because of Stubblefield 480 High Density Apartments along Rt. 330, recommended to the City Council by you and the City Attorney on July 15, 1991, that RSA should receive the same apartment recommendation for Secret Hollow Ranch. On the City March 22, 1993 Agenda the Stubblefield apartments were represented to be accessed by a 2800 foot long sub-standard road per recommended Development Agreement. You then couched the former Woodland Heights Figure 3.3-1 Land Use Map, found in the never completed draft documents submitted to planning by others, as some sort of grand fathering or concurrence in the Sterling Heights proposed re-alignment of Dedicated Sterling Avenue into a winding non-public private easement. In addition, while attending the previous ERC/DRC meeting you made certain reference to this same issue, and at that time RSA again commented that the Woodland Heights Draft Specific Plan was submitted by the previous owner, and that RSA did not concur in the feasibility of its proposed design. In response to your comments regarding RSA's Orchard Hills Illustrative Plan, I clarified the following to those present and the Environmental Review Committee (EIR). The RSA Orchard Hills Illustrative Plan was a RSA contribution to the City and was identified "For Discussion Purses Only' for Norton Expansion and East Valley Residential Support RSA or myself has never discussed with anyone or thought of developing Apartments of any kind on the Secret Hollow Ranch (110 acres). As to Stubblefield's Rt. 330 High Density Apartments you mentioned, and their massive grading into the City Creek Canyon Streambed by June 1992, but not limited to, these issues were addressed in my letters to the Mayor and Common Council dated February 15, 1993 and March 22, 1993 and further addressed at their March 22, 1993 council meeting. Copies and photolog were also provided to you for your office at that time. While speaking to Mr. Penman on march 22, 1993 he related to me that you were reviewing these letters and photologs. We also commented that the twelve month statute of limitations had not been reached. (See previously forwarded RSA February 15, 1993 and march 22, 1993 letters RE:Stubblefield sub-standard access, High Density Apartments,massive grading and Sueambed alteration) As to your referencing Figure 3.3-1 Illustrative Plan in the uncompleted Draft Woodland Heights document and specifically the proposed Sterling Avenue re-alignment as some sort of approved joint primary/secondary access I clarified the following. On December 18, 1991 the ERC/DRC did their on site review of RSA property on February 4, 1992 RSA met with Planning and other City Departments as to this alternate Figure 3.1-1 primary/secondary access configuration. At the February 1992 meeting Fire/Planning/Engineering did not concur in the proposed alignments on figure 3.3-1 and RSA addressed it's existing Dedicated Sterling Avenue and Bonita Vista Drive secondary access recorded and approved for construction by the City 1/22186. From that February 1992 meeting RSA met with Planning and other Departments on June 4, and 11, 1992. After expending approximately $150 thousand, RSA presented alternate primary/secondary access alignments to meet City code and at that time Planning/Fire/Engineering preferred Dedicated Sterling Avenue and Daley Canyon East Primary/Secondary access which was approved by the City for construction, recorded and bonded 1/22/86. RSA Secret Hollow Ranch access alternatives included a 24 foot wide Multi-Plate Tunnel access to meet City Code Primary/Secondary width requirements. By Planning meeting, and resulting letter dated July 14, 1992 to Stubblefield and copied you, the MRfTAGE Of THE MOUNTANS AND VA3131'BEGAN N 1(50 ({7 OHEADQUARTERS:l OE310E ROX 3116.ARROm1ffAD SRRNGS,SAN DERNARDNo,GVJEO 91106 RESIDENCE MAnING:3195 RROADMOOR ROUIEVARD,SAN RERNARDNO,CAf1rOR 92W,(7141 IIMI53 A v,RM4 v..O WN QD 3AMRT-.-A- Page 3 Rt. 330 15 foot wide Multi-Plate Equestrian Trail Tunnel under the November 1989 City/Caltrans Freeway Agreement, is then miraculously viewed as a City acceptable Sub- Standard Secondary Fire Truck Access located at the end of a Sub-Standard 2800 Cul-de-Sac frontage road leading to your July 15, 1991 recommended 480 High Density Stubblefield Apartments, with another Sub-Standard Secondary access north thereof by cutting the Rt. 330 Freeway Non-Access chain link fence for every Fire and Emergency ingress/egress. Dedicated Sterling Avenue is a 2800 foot Public Street (40 foot paving and 60 foot R/W) that meets City Standards and is the Primary/Secondary access for Sterling Heights (50 acres), City Property (168.7 acres), Secret Hollow Ranch (I 10 acres) and the many existing homes to the west. The existing homes have no Secondary Emergency Access. According to Tom Dodson & Associates January 22, 1993 Final Report and recommendation for the Sterling Heights SEIR, the appropriate findings were not made to vacate Dedicated Sterling Avenue when Tentative Tract 14112 was approved by Planning Commission on November 7, 1990. There was no staff report, testimony or mention of vacating Sterling Avenue in the FEIR. YOL represented the Planning Commission. I addressed Dedicated Sterling Avenue and Mr. Dodson's Final Report in my February 15, 1993 letter to the Mayor and Common Council regarding their February 15, 1993 Agenda item 32, establishment of an Assessment District. Even Dennis Barlow, Senior Assistant City Attorney, in his February 12, 1993 Voice of the People Dedicated Sterling Avenue Legal Opinion noted: "There is an application to be filed, and a fee to be paid by the affected property owners wanting to vacate the street. Such vacation is then reviewed by the designated City Department for action by the Mayor and Council" Enclosed is a copy of my February 15 1993 letter pursuant to Agenda Item 32 to the Mayor and Common Council pursuant to Agenda Item 32 RE: (1) January 22, 1993 Sterling Heights Final Dodson Report, (2) Hodgdon January 25, 1993 Voice of the People Article, (3) Holcomb January 27, 1993 Voice of the People Article, (4) Barlow February 12, 1993 Voice of the People Article and Opinion, (5) EVWD Geological Exploration, (6) $11.5 million Stubblefield Damages awarded against the City and, (7) RSA support of Assessment District for Dedicated Sterling Avenue/Bonita Vista Drive Primary/Secondary access. (See attached W WH February 15, 1993 letter to Mayor/Council RE:Agenda Item 32) I also confirmed to you at the April 15, 1993 ERC meeting that the City Property (Little Sand Canyon) was 168.7 acres and was received from the U.S. BLM on April 14, 1974 under the "Act to Consolidate National Forest Lands." Easements have been Granted by the City for Development/Access purposes to the EVWD, SBCFC and Gilbert Van Camp, former owner of Sterling Heights property. Enclosed is a copv of my letter dated April 12 1993 to Al Boughey, Planning Director regarding the Apnl 6, 1993 pre-ERC/DRC meeting, and which was held subsequently on April 15, 1993, Agenda Item 3. Said letter addressed, but not limited to, (1) 1/3 cost each for Primary/Secondary Access, (2) DFG Non-Attendance of ERC/DRC April 8 and 15 1993 meetings, (3) Explicit Mitigation and Performance Standards, (4) City Little Sand Canyon Mitigation Lands, (5) CityBLM and USFS Consolidation Act Lands, (6) December 18, 1992 DFG 1601 and Corp. 404 Permit Process, (7) Sterling Heights/City Land Schematic Landscape/Mitigation Plan and Cost. OMRRAGE Or THE MOUNTAMS AND VAllTY LEGAN W IISO -- HEADQUARTERS POST OMa WX 2146.ARROWM¢ SPRR6GS.SAN 6ERNA No 'K .cnurownA 92406 `WI] RESIDENCE MAMMG.1295 RROADMOOR 60U VARD,SAN IERNA No, C.ALIFOIIMA 924M,p14l 9814153 A fAIIN[R i...M.N QED)IAMRY GIIOII!AflIl1Al{ Page• g (See attached W WH April 12, 1993 letter to At Bougpey RE:April 8 and 15, 1993 ERQDRC Agenda Item 3) Certainly from your position you can continue to unfairly single out myself and/or RSA by continuing an effort to entangle us with your Stubblefield $11.5 million damages fiasco awarded against the City in April 1991. The Public and City would be better served if the ability for constructive determination and resolution were applied by your office to this and the many outstanding legal matters the City faces. We have, but not limited to, most sincere concern of the $11.5 Million Stubblefield Damages awarded against the City (on appeal), and the growing City cost of both the Stubblefield and Arden/Guthrie Defense. You have repeatedly refused to meet and even hear our suggestion for settlement of these issues. Please remember that the City Attorney demanded that Highland Hills Properties and RSA Defend and Hold the City Harmless in defense of the Highland Homeowners Association and Save San Bernardino (adopted General Plan) Writ of Mandates respectively. RSA volunteered to Defend the City and retained the law firm of Reid & Hellyer. By everyone working together, including Dennis Barlow and later yourself, these actions against the City, Mayor/Council and Environmental Review Committee were Settled by Agreement and Dismissals approved and filed with the Superior Court. RSA cost was several hundred thousand dollars and there was No Cost or No Loss to the City. As you know, I worked with you and the City Attorney and settled out of court the • pending March 1992 litigation against the City and EDA regarding contiguous Sterling Avenue City/EDA acquisition property fronting foothill drive. The plaintiffs attorney was Stubblefields's legal Counsel Darlene Fischer Phillips, Esq. Stubblefield Property, regarding Ms. Phillips $11.5 million damages won against the City in April 1991 is contiguous to RSA Highland Hills property which is the subject of the City/Highland Hills Homeowners . Settlement Agreement. You represented the defense of the City in this action. It is noted with interest and fascination the coincidence that Stubblefield's attorney, Darlene Fischer Philips, Esq. also represent Sterling Heights and separately, the Arden/Guthrie plaintiffs against the City and Mr. Penman. It is my understanding the City cost for outside legal counsel regarding Arden/Guthrie has now reached approximately $700 thousand. Submitted for clarification, Warner W. Hodgdon CC: At Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services Greg Gubman,Associate Planner James F.Penman,City Attorney Dan McKinney.Esq. HERrrAGE OF THE MOVN S AND VAIIFY BEGAN W 1150 OHEADQUARTERS POST OMU BOX 2141,ARROM1'1¢AD SPRDIGS,SAN BERN TNO,CALIi'ORNU 92406 RUMENCE MAILING:1195 BROADMOOR BOr1LE VA ,,SAN BERNARDDIO,CAUFORNIA 92b .(]1 41 1134153 A i.1RNEA i.NOCCpOA f{- lA}1pT CIIOVr ARIlIATE C I T T O r �S jan Bernardino 0!♦ARTYINT of PLAMMIND AND IYILDI NO gg AYICE ■ A L 9 0 u a 0 T q H E Y . A l O p 0 1 N ! 0 April 15, 1993 Mark E. Landers Jack D, VanderWoude MelcOTP Investments, Inc. The Tahiti Group P.Q. Box 3332 San Bernardino, CA 92413 P.O. Box 5441 San Bemardino, CA 92412 RS: Tentative Tract No. 14112 & Conditional Use Permit No. 89-67 (Sterling Heights)/Extension of Time Dear Sirs: On Thursday, April 15, 1993, the Sterling Heights Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), and comments and responses thereto, were reviewed and discussed by the Development and Environmental Review Committee (DRC/ERC). The following motions were unanimously carded: 1• That the SEER, comments and responses be forwarded to the Planning Commission with a recommendation for certification, subject to the revisions to the SEIR addressed in the responses to comments; and 2• That Tentative Tract No. 14112 & Conditional Use Permit, g9-67/Fxtenslon of 71me be forwarded to the PIanning Commission, subject to the stipulation that the tentative tract map be to to incorporate the re-establishment of Sterling Avenue prior to the Planning Commission hearing, Please be advised that the staff report to the Planning Commission will include a condition of approval stating that, if the Sterling Avenue extension is re established, then the obligation of the Sterling Heights proponents toward the cost of constructing the road shall be limited ti their faif-share; the exact percentage of their obligation shall be determined under separate negotiations between the owners of the propetties that abut the Sterling Avenue extension. ! 0 0 N O A T N D Z T M E E T A:5�6 S A L 1 , 0 g N I A 0 2 , 1 E . u 0 0 , t T t A j a E A. E 0 T t ,E 0 E T Mown. Landm & V=derWoudo April 15. 1993 Page 2 If you have any quesdons, please contact me at (909) 384.5057. Sincerely, Greg Gubman Aasociwc Planner cc, Warner W. Hodgdon Aaron W. Hodgdon Post Office Box 2146 San Bernardino, CA 92406 15111 , :1 A I "I I MON IL. -I; i ! 2�1--Iv-�,Zti-,; ..V" illicit 5% WWWQ won. A M low -MMITI,Ml- Q4 f4 VIA V 1 v v -TOO . .....� N-Q& loop V� 'I Q� AA ♦ A- A CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FINAL AGENDA DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Development and Environmental Review Committee (DRC/ERC) is a City staff committee responsible for technical review of projects. The committee is made up of representatives from Public Works- Engineering, Police, Fire Marshall, Water, Planning and Building Services, Parks and Recreation, and (Economic) Development Departments. Applicants and their representatives should attend the meeting to clarify issues and receive input from City Departments and other reviewing agencies. A DRC/ERC case takes on an average 30 minutes. MEETING DATE: Thursday, April 15 , 1993 MEETING TIME: 9 :00 a.m. MEETING LOCATION: Fourth Floor Conference Room City Hall 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino CA 92418 A. Consent Cases: B. Regular Cases: PROJECT PLANNER 1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 14450 JOHN Applicant: Genesis Design Group LAMPE APN: 152-132-12 Ward: 5 Proposal: Divide 1.36 acres into two parcels of 19,570 square feet and 39,507 square feet in the RS, Residential Suburban and CG-1, General Commercial, land use zone districts. The subject site is located on the northwest corner of "E" Street and Marshall Boulevard extending westerly to Acacia Avenue. Status: Preliminary review on April 1, 1993. Staff Recommendation: Categorically Exempt, review revised parcel map and clearance onto Planning Commission. auwzeie pe» Environmental and Development Review Committee Meeting April 15, 1993 Page 2 2. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15538 JOHN Applicant: Michael Cole and Jon Peddie LAMPE Owner: same APN: 261-072-12 and 13 Ward: 5 Proposal: Subdivide 4.11 acres into 13 single family lots in the RL, Residential Low--minimum required area 10,800 square feet. Status: Preliminary review and approved Negative Declaration for public review by DRC/ERC on February 11, 1993. Staff Recommendation: Clearance onto Planning Commission and recommend adoption of Negative Declaration. 3. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14112 i CONDITIONAL GREG USE PERMIT NO. 89-67 (EXTENSION OF TIME) GUBMAN Applicant: Melcorp Investments, Inc. Owner: Tahiti Group APN: 155-372-01 thru 34, 155-601-01 thru 69, 155-591-01 thru 20 Ward: 4 Proposal: To create a 56-lot single- family residential subdivision on approximately 50.51 acres located north of Foothill Drive, .west of the Sterling Avenue extension, in the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation and within the Hillside Management Overlay District. Status: Continued from April 8, 1993 Staff Recommendation: 1. Response to comments to Supplemental Environmental Impact Report addressing the reestablishment of Sterling Avenue and revisions to the previously approved tentative map to incorporate the reestablishment of Sterling Avenue; and 2 . Clearance to the Planning Commission Environmental and Development Review Committee Meeting April 15, 1993 Page 3 4. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15222 AND JEFF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (TYPE III) NO. 93-01 ADAMS Applicant: Juan Baires-Adair / Project Home Run Owner: City of San Bernardino - Redevelopment Agency APN: 138-251-18 Ward: 3 Proposal: Subdivision of 1.29 acres into six residential lots, and construction of six single family residences. The site is located on the north side of Second Street, approximately 400 feet west of Mt. Vernon Avenue on 1.29 acres in the RS, Residential Suburban land use designation. Status: Continued from March 18, 1993 Staff Recommendation: Recommend proposed Negative Declaration. 5. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14789 (EXTENSION OF MICHAEL TIME) FINN Applicant: Chestnut Hills Estates Owner: Same as Applicant APN: 261-141-03 Ward: 5 Proposal: A one year extension of time until April 2, 1994 for Tentative Tract No. 14789, a request to subdivide 20.47 acres into 64 single-family lots. The site is located on the north side of Irvington Avenue between Chestnut Avenue and Magnolia Avenue in the RL, Residential Low (10,800 square foot minimum lot size) land use designation. Status: New Item Staff Recommendation: Clearance onto Planning Commission with previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. 6. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 93-04 JOHN Applicant: Luis T. and Maria R. BDRKE Gonzalez Owner: Same APN: 145-183-02 , 03 Ward: 2 Proposal: To adjust property line to remove existing house encroachment across present property line. Status: New item Staff Recommendation: Preliminary review/approval -1 71 I wol tio jf%,j, .4 N wd� 5 crN 5FLV�S Ag Z4 Wd gp... ........ .I AMY re .2V�f.Q11 t, ,ki, 7. r 120 ACRES EAN BERNARDINO CITY LINES t ` S j / • 'i ZI +i z .. 'I S.B. couxrY 14 a y l EPI ERE OF INFLUENCE LINES ' I RSA COMPANY) y ' t �♦ .t USF IN22 PUBLIC A610ESS R Milk 6R �REATIDN AIk I I ♦ t v ^ • ° / \` "y'��\ y u // 4 .• d 1t + .:.i.:....... .�..: FF�SON HUNIT DA ',R SF�RVE f i �i \�•`•L r ..0 .,� rll it�F{� \ - `� �. f. T i �/ —t 1 :' � �`d°F 5 r""` �. r��.iT�} •A 8WpgLIRMRVt iME ' IT•, r( r- , ��`e7 � a ��� It• � •, ` ISTO IC�AOCR REBER� r nLST RI DALEY LllMBER AND TOLL ROAd c��t\ ` I LSFS N26 ACCESS ROAD�& RECREATION TA) !"!, s „�•V L '}Z -L= a S\ ,.. t ''' .MIECR IHO/LOW _NCH 1110 ACRES11t.: ar 1• t '� 1 ' t ) E 1 TRI WfREBER�OIRs?1� �tT z•' U.$FS HOT OT .^I—•J ISTINO ,1 7• a S{L`�r-w• * 'rr ,C FIREFIOXr TER C 8' �W�EC � • """ y ' i WWEV�WP REE RVOIR SfTE 4 $aL Ffry may ^..I / 1. •� WILO WE EItYO1S AND WATEIATROUOX, 1,�MAS PAIN, "ELIkPOr, !_- r 4k �/ II j GATE I i f yf •. EATRWSOTO!D %l I ACRE Af� A DoV,DEN%Il OEM i!Lll Acdh aR�G"" r a; DILATED QALEY G YOIEfRD�"� ♦. pEV.DEMBITY 7E U1�If6 ���xJw/ a. Fllovfo i 5�co Deo rxzrss " ha ']- h.PR / �: 'r4L �.:- i• *1{iP a ! }` . �Yr . ! Y� _ ° 1 rI �,. •h.§BWDiPROPE TY c• • r,: '1 i� a I`i- - OLIVE ORCHARD �,1) � �y f ♦r 1. Ar ° ! e EIIT�NNR LS •�. 1 Z w, F,� T a;4 y • °`I `> BRING Go . L � r LIT SAND 1MEADarON UNIT ,C ya • If _ 1 F ' ^fi ' rL 5AN SCIAIN$OCI HEI T r �lr�`( P �L I ¢IOMuM' SY'E13fdY• D GA SE Q 1 R' 1 as .t<T'+� E,[ ya*. �sR r a `• ORANGEORC�ARD �f WSFSN1! �sECnNo r ) \` • r' -h.�i i a Et]'/V rBSRECO(1DE,D Mr;;r98 w • a 1.4`4 ` ~ HEML is p, ..LQ � • sy I W'a -.r a r A a FS J? T w: s 0 r. 0r� t sii AV ny - -F`aP'f ILL i �` o ., .. ,;.�'�: Y .P r r ♦,. �., !' !'I7 � !'! �Lv °fin . n F !� iaa:• rVE- ♦.F` w A %hi z Y i ADS RI iL ay ♦i-i n ^ ', . ••pt�,r'�f '`��t '4 y � 1111.,. vc.pxvR N A stXOO K ♦ � .• . �t 'o w �„ -1 � I '? I T is ;� } Y t •'i , �' ql� - a �. e.�/ �i A�na,.!,4'.,.� '� � n C DEYL IIOS VEN �'r t.A_ 'S'-1I1C L r ♦ y,*+ ..!tI IJEIDMON E T tlB y as uNns a r . iF -'R . i { `. 'I}-_��-�y,�ILi • S.' L !r : ajy * ii.�° �'i�j°'; Ss r:, t 00 'AG �rE'; • t.i.�'tr J A,. t•° A y STERLING AwwwE w `r c.��•:a. �y.n�li��'.l� ,L,L�A:{{Pa.�� ��a.F i' L �' .f � T � i '}j•.. .� _ Fr T l a .,� i; fl"RANL'uT A �, �t p ';N� a- i . it - A ! am •�..�t -` —7ir ' F .yyff�-j�� }[- 1l^" X'C i•. s.fi 1 L� tia� ; •' •eF ,w`¢r. fa' ♦ L �\ * a i .•. •L i7',.it�SCrlj'Ys OF S' N 891 / r L a' E Y w:�� °j: i #�ARyy OR EXPA , c'�'1' • > w /`�,{I • �. t EAR VA LE - SIDE �nE�;Slil tL i a _ i�1 ...� w Y 3 • ° .y A.•Pa f _9 _�.v, I - r5d `B. _.._I }i-�l'Q�a. Nl pw�_ - .r J--.'La x:a • 1,FR..e.:_.' B � - r.0". N " `'iy_ .� -:'�En•1b+fR_ k�� F.� - AitSHA LiB'L i - F r - 0VENv1EW BY ARNUN W uVUGDON 1991 FOOTHILL YRIVE STENLINO AVENUE DEL RO.A AVENUE + r �1A Eft ANU U5E ' LAN 0ODLAND HIEIGHTS .a {+u. ^.. Cr F yL p lYj +,2.s rl't�..h`'if s'i,'.pi ya.f �}. �+. ,="i.)•i'i,CFC ..rte i°eo r f lrrTQ v y ia'•t t'G'i a Y��.'•x k.r'C,-,•?'�!:a'f•z~'�a?}"4"r a Yi i 3rv{x''r J"F♦'•n-„sy E wy`'`§•��Pa"Jm�'sK-`.�"5.r L`.A�a51N".•e'y-%S_r'-a.•rC E'•k�C'`ix,.•�i+`_kYrKr oj'.r,...a Y�a�S••N.[r•r't-s 3 Y'y 3.R�;"l.y.tr:!x rra'�r•,t`"'x?)w1:fi s{wfr.ya.''.�fr3Si,y S.� 3''hfir1 4�`-„''/'•r esa lgt-57,�a 7<cc r,o-�di�t'i^"'<R'+-F'?1..ir•'e v+S,-A 3S+V A 7 8a♦4s'�<•9n T V�+.�-Ys s•S t t 4.'.!1>{a s1 loll'�O r t Gp 7. 2 y •a i9�FY.,�i.-w14�.x -wW y£twa�tb'i-y r Y•Frxti 4 Y"E *e.- i•r 4 h f !s'L r a`- r r t" 3 > °'- _,yir-�-i•S,�s y !�M• IT CF '.L x 4�•i'x . t «a' .fit>�.,, xsy '• 'Cta� u tT�ry♦SSnr'.,:�'° -°.,.`.t=' N'b`+LR.tS+ Ys.w Psis ,na�� �'t.+. '�� .�<�a2�TXi�t}{Af'•��}`E'A'+ '7'-"".k...Y .. a+ ,y tf` ti.. a f m .Yw' t1 2Tt 4- +^4 ass_ ti� �z^w'sa✓ •r r t t b i; ro� {25 '+• tCtivaf+r,{,ate �a£'y54t` aasj s -jy! �A, W,�r�q`.�"SC tir+ t ..xlyafa^.,3,t ..� Y t•°.G+ � °r'-Wa` .}-�Y � y1r 3xt' r+ w.. .ww "ui�4�X.s, -'s rs•.,.L'x+`�`° s"ttis<" T y+i' >aZi`+cy`'yan tt<�sa•`�`"i ry, r `4°"q♦t`:t'bIi'{S' . r'1 a.. �., s'IY,e a' >.><' r'$§.rw.5. Yc. i• .s yr a{.l.?,i r r` . ycx..•- a• '-y Sxwn� �cy,y�ja+/1°r �.2 �'>v4•,` 'Wns. �'E''2 ' +rC+Fx1C,ti.? a+� e4*{"3�, ' s Ei `+?.. t.+ ry .ri 4 al m; p ' �i`_nr.YrM '�E.'itt' QA IV �w :K.a r `'•{f,.$'aF• F,a :,£ip,f>7'a.:. ...+Cr .•!{ 'mot Pi` tatkr` m•r! rfi •�f '1F Vt YT�`.JrY34 �' r.�tk,�,� S'.u.-�f•'y':", exr•Fa' , �'4• °" y-a+'r; '�`°�,k�'src,•ta:,m ,� a -MON." �m Sr .?a.r�r•' f:E° .y < yy���,v'Gµ'a"i'{'y. c1 x^!ryy. Chi x�,4.¢ xtc>z'r •t3F-a""'"}wxS'd ya�'.er .F.sNRYotYP',3r-r!�.-s..crkr•T,rv`�sr5� r3♦�a,P4aa.�.Sti"i�yyv'�✓-if-„{suh r 3-. r�y„e �.yl.•+Y.f� rK3i.LC•f�4�.y�Y��tr•.xy{1"y.T � .r•}� al'•�s��y��} u �Jx_",�.±y '�i _+-�'}h 3 +• +o-e\ji _}j'i s:}T r.,r w rT ,.�}ro14s i3 '.n .n,}r' a4.N ,},. f�`tr r-•+ ta{ .ri♦,y{:`Y,si"td.kr ?.tir 64 r •tr'Y j}}' s> - x '.` > �" r! •i+ 7 f/ "". l -,r.YJia t'^ .r {. '? '..5'-1 hixEr s a,TMT,,, +fe F +xa<,tibf ^ �H Nrt .� 'u.cr>y fs•.,,.+,+ty ^�3�°-da::Y .Ku T ♦ -F v1. t w.�rr�x- °'l nr"�yrtra Lr '' �f,♦ s.tyM�`a> r wir' r r .`-s"'at r'.`. .+�f\'t L�°^'Y a it $ ^e gz X.4r+•«F i x�r f�.'k a.' r •-r rs. 5..w+• 4 s s u.F ° ,F�•<i .ILCI y y .'lc i` {k.�i^r-` ys a7't'• 3.a c♦ .n R .,•li- +4v4 ,v�,.� x"y�iS.w'by ev �.s s r3i R'rr+•Fnrt� tiLa�C2r z ..'vim L: .) 7a' vl,a p''y..e'Rt y'PA' err; ':n:r 'sd rn'`..'ai.1� °... K� .H r'n] "'4f r '�s-.t3.,r -i F+(iwt •�.t�Y M +r�•.3 �# t�''rjisf'�S"G)a�� w y a'e`�''.¢ `sl s'(G �•.s 'i-sf.c� 1,..r- ,fi n.. �. cs x tas t'jS}•�t a'-O .•�3s r ..r- s S• iy-.y - of r 1 F a''�hFrl Ya"'?°1" .s-5 'u u. ✓°,rj. eL •ry1 G'�`.t `lf+ -�eKrgLvSnr-7rii Ai > 'S^f ga-aii�A ��$+•'1y k'S.n.z^7-�•1vr,iG�tl'+y ✓ T '-.Y +•„y, i�.., �'-. k •0°{' yrfT rt2 �Fr �x3µ'SY v^a'� I. L{';isr <ft �}'.�T" �M �?'•G s4-'! �` 'a>>t a• l 1 .i�, •k. �„'n .�aPT. ' -ilia r vim[, s LYt4 � Fs y3.r�a.''} i%,+".cst a .,✓'=p°._ sY3 .Al-.� 9sh• �tlk- s 1y R: "EJ ]! `F •Y i ri} �' J P 9 A,...> ! ij f p� q°d n-•ry •v t I}'♦ !-. ^t .;` s.� 4 'rr a-t.v S•SY. rr>.r.}aG �er* ,�r�A! fi -.� -{� sa'YF. .t�*a• `p.n ♦E. .r: a tka t.E{ -1P . "'K. -,t ; ra K < aiC a Cre .A, � > r♦ t l <'L.• .• .r 'f ti'.<`y e"{'•.yc'��.s..l �`s ..- .i :5 ^' r ''.- z e''r• 4• A six J:�� 4 rrla s ->_>c+ -�. �l-s h,3.Ya+ i-3 y :^J+ y,�•.'+ ,}^0,-r r .�i•,-,.r �• Y aG'r'iYa"� x.. ,. r s hrkc zr t rr Y ov Pa s lzi i� t �l�r [�t ( ��e'i �3 hI i-4'ri-•� ��h•:�[j34w i���iE.`•"�xS �"YV l'kk^�%q�K��r�^L•.�C }y�•�£�,ra's.��" t e> � Y ..3 � � s�{,�t}C. .-;Cpi.� ��t may., ^iLI'• +.. � �-l� t"'rr '.1' .+a�'`.f+iP-?^Cs.Ti•liti J v Y-sF'YC �r ~ t r r yltinSYY.Y^h�yE��tvt✓� y Y4l'sfv lly Fb $T{frK �y tea fiAF3 s. SJti^' ii ass r' 'xio< �'�r R j'•-�' `"` ♦k's• rr � 0 'p,l 1`k t:�"4a j b�.E,+'.r+.j.�,,,�^.n" n {x,CP '3x yr+rm�•=n�* z>a. ".t'}A`�.C'"'y ..ti'r Y=',.�Sx r ,$ 7. + G <� 'S-•�'}'S C}'l`�*rl-T•✓ 44L s.1.> L•+ 3 !,,.Awj r1`�S'r+, rte* +riy3'31.w �_y�� -i.�rw�r✓a•�X'`�-l�_ ;MW Y ! r+ 4 l arm -♦ Y ♦ >} a �. r"Y..t w ♦ �, '����++i L':.. ".is. ✓y,. rra �t7'r3n' nshtti3s- }.y> _wrt +i.,'4'".z•. •yv.4+..F��msY�,t.,>P.�`" .,+ <Iss+�. .Y^ �-7Q. 4 F TT +.. �b4 �' s� •e• )F7• `^fi �-R o +.i >T ! v 1 1 t it $'xn C,.# m•'Y t!'r ivY Te! \,3 S M S 14 S4`k+ I•• Y} = S `4'< , t f- .I' ♦` 3 .,,,{q r ylS.!..t r, .� fe^?'3 (> . 7 x ar s,.t„rNC S a••'TSF.K. i k sr /� .a>a+x�t s�{••t r fAm�`<a�vei1`*{tW yiT> '.} S.i-3"tYS'Atty Y F 5 Y�. 3 "�A y%yRw'•.fi Sy4,x X larii i i };xi q3 �3 _ +-o-1x f r .♦ 1 .may r <-f`3 L' 'x` s ;F t* cx wo -t R >•�.qf♦ TP v a C v t a .r /-Zv+w.Ya r i-Sassy- +kq3 w a xl y3, Fta�dtT u G'{r 'a'�. r, - � r Sz�KY i R. t R J 3x F -s r� .n 'Fr a'^'r�'{5p�1L.✓q. �S<�.r,.� 5 e.•y# �'y at SY �.s '7tL.r.r=' `"ETar s♦w- "E inf a'K.�'Si4�jy'"Ma i"�S�I F�tJrY°•a�yh�.e� '."3`:.Yt,FA}i',n sy.'iit5+'^rvv, fJ'$4hj�si.�iT•:Sd�esf'. y� ~�j " a..+l';s x+br*��. ,�.,� '�-�,�l.,r{ qa i��1x,] y s T xNC„`+ 1 a '�`. y. rr N•1 ° M.n�' s +1 J arL . `. f ;a- w vllC•` +S t >tF �\v x t "$ ;r .N`ey ,•-• 3•♦a ✓y.._rni i at � x ,yr sf y sr 'G'L.t-a 'a"� -5.` '^ '" .r? r 3-.q' vw�•1r-f .t•a`�,,4'�" .�'i-2`.a,�r i r ->S,( . -a1',`1�.4��.f" s:j sriJ r I xc t r r ?iazi-y�`r 3a5 5'rrr'z rS•s � � � u�a}x s`r i'e "b ex�+wx> at^uZj"'� _ L., a. ..,.3;w. �.a 4P '�.3 nkY')x �''r 'r' R•4 kr..:>.>..{ '.�>.'� mCx.r.� �W' 4.'u TTy'N4 rtir yr. 4G t. yY fph Rt t a• .3 F..-+ r yam' f.xsN )•+•'Yr^' h-{'f- C„•�r•� ��t � �$ 'K S7l .+'�i. 3 .; 4•+�ik h Tjis4.0 �cb frAas^`i.`f�'., f♦ .♦axr` vf+t''"v" Lx a,{y �� 'l +'£v. �}� f.r 'v^sa . M J, i ♦'- r'R.r'?'� n.5 ��4.,rayk�'8a.fi-.r•[rM-.t'l�1'"^'r, }.ti�Y;'a°'3=s.a'� �a-,fSlr=4 k Y.- C :`Yt. v RrL A n } A•4-` a fSyi '?'rl- XSli-♦kZ $:r t$+ r mac ? "'•�1 X.` +.�J.S.T'au' tY '3 ' >.�. }.. s >♦S! s Cx'+ w hxfs s'y,,,`=2'�` t•'r� i � +ws ,x r•^' rsc Y 4 4""a♦ 3c'k`3 .,,as,t y`�.t.�,yt`k rxa�r .�°a x en. z' / ✓'-r t f+ r k4's, i } r'.s` + ,AF v Rya{ .?x Sr1. '�„( st�.s '{ .! L S S.>< s- ^♦ � . . a .>: ,�•:7.>o--s+.;�i.�,s- 'x> �{ ,r,•t t fir- -R�r�r -ts�+•.t"�.t�f�"'..a�""•--•> - .a +�`.e'�-�,^ ✓ 't y t s...y� t §d�.r'7' .tl J� Ap., s Y ay� at•""..na`y:,i >*+.+.-x i i�.i. xr�-`x�� vk.es Sy G'2 .e•f'ct a'tr,e -i s. . "[ 'C j< .t p '.F "c'+` n x4,t+ x ..Y; {S tt•.+ r;.• �.,�<tY.'�♦t a? �xyT-�= n�a lis���ty� 3t Av ♦ a�* ,sJ'j cSpfY.2"..riiK4 �r{a.>(yl�.syn++!yy3. t,s. .3-+7•aY`A•;,h(i �`r� �+.s•>a,�x ♦S;y�✓isv iC 3.:`.-v+w.i�.�cc�a dF+t`i-cat Yt"-� rS�l�'• rg't f w �+z+�r�'.i• r 'Zd} t } •i. �'1 `�''S^i ss} ''�e `S`3 ty- `'2a`k�v .k`Id:'# �F»�aa r y t`F-'"J'!:j�"s�;t'�J� >.�rP�l+ � 3'r+Ef✓�.�f-,�.j1t1^,�' _ y2„' i'rJt. rtr Y�-i� x.Ti°'°.YY"3+ 'Yy..r h' :-.�'7'^�i'�'•� L�'S•�"'. +t •••i t, t t$� a � !:. �• J 5 S"r-wy.Srr�.-yy r>ie� �'•4a^�}�rSnS-t., L �h-3 Yt- 3�s+w v+`y. n ''-*•,yjt S.. A.i.,Y�'p.n.3tL. +. �sa"h-J• xx.r.�x�i r `. 'si�E sr szx�"�e''"?'t� s?.t�1.7..�irlf..'�'T`.{�•��yi^�iR�`ar��t'ti"'F•F•S.�A.•`+iP}.iCr.'E-4a�.a-,'��,n S��r�„ Gs�'�k'y�°"S♦'6t•AR�m`r'x� s'�r"�'a.'i..°.> r3. y c-.y�5�'I{ u� { +e• r h•at X` { Sy4 'u'^ -fiH".S'>:a as �r.R n}i3� r 14'x� c.rYS� b 3fr'„S. .,4n ..f l..e s •'„s z }y£7 4 �.<r»S�.F ^,cA'v+"'S'-+.`w`3� r-_Rar'�SX^'�-r• �+"uY� k T-t„�.tros%'"jyy,,.u,.e. i,�ASJS?`,. a`rartb "SSG� I b 3.� aa•. ia'a � ��a.. S �}i-tyjv a����tTt' �aC§.. .Yn iia`aia vsiS 'tws a ,�..r ee`.�,w, a tik�,�5�.,l�.,., n;� t s. r4 }.�.•. .A �` Za��n Cy a'.ku w.�R ��i-{x�-(q'r Y!'�Q+•r� Ef-A�kax•*� ,<,�t .}• X..k ,�.tiyiy���`;Y,f�dr5'YS�r.HK�'¢N���'�•,�`�.�•r�3i t yp kt ♦,q.=e `-7 7i u��+v«.ry[ x„Y-`r c ^ �r Ja ryi�♦ r r _ ' ,z' ♦ s shy �Y°` 4*""."a. �C"t3ssy.�f' +i �l ✓'.r•" k-L QJYAt'r yx. r.-`` ! w, xts� i&�'aa��: r"' '�>•• "itGxi� c'(`^51^fY^'x %r-x�rf.3�SY ^TC< rC�'a-n r r Sv q'j ia•. F .1.4a 'arx,, ,p. �>.':r �z'�'R y�'S a�..2 �tai{1a a yj'♦ti'$-�ru;`.t..-,!%t r`..sFa sfry�'?-�.i€•sF.. vcF+',yi& '4Jr� 'inz r "W��•y _CYyq�;�ti}p :{ �^i'.i♦.•Vr-r ay S A�H�l�x�sr. ^- y''p cn -nv � 'Ya.roryJ^S.r.'a �, ss1. ��! ax.T Sa'+ t'kpl Y ^i� a+-L LY♦�'aY Av .L '.. ••r:.r�x'�'S{j.'J" rCT=NM't .{��wa y.�. a � � „'la'-r•. rg'i.-i..r�a3� �'f'Si*�%r hr .t� �Cyt rf°.f -i�`P�7 tFt �i`rkr.K ft,��v-'�'wrt. •i:; " .i t t°- i i.,'P<<'L V3".�iv.Ae�.ty�'. rS Wx.'S vSrt f ` qx w 4y•E!'�� u��-Y y"1`.F. t h°♦+.�'> tt ,eT .'3•'tx" 3$i }�i,rf esf-l^!r St'4 t1`'-{�x'ar.,,X.�:'R e�+�i•rare3{t''�••.Zx.•I(s r'S��r:Tw+.ya3'qca'�3>s-t`."ai._1"•�•'3in A'.•�a tY..s d.y.r..i`yit��X�4 r'`:T•n':��♦'xr'.n"'rcL�zt`rw.3>�•wtM ;0{ rx=•y,L ',rw� - 1, idM•'3'li"Y a zt�a yKx�s'},efetik['it\ddn'pt 7��'^t r'♦ 'YsY ,he� •="3•ra v3�K•V'.'xt�ls�+kr:`tS"<'yr 2ye'M's"rr:e a."♦'a�'a r.Y�'a.yf.H'F'S-F xL�+'�'F"ra'w,"5 r�'.'•,p, xO va'•�fs{tp`y-1'>`Nd hyv§3 t.�a."°s+'"�✓7r.R��-d..a vs " � a'-'•,�. �Slily s✓¢�t`y t'4�&.,4£r-r"�3--r"1ys ra5h i:nf./+..s'�'��<a.•�a.S- tr�,,�.x>"i s*+t•.,''y�, r *s.p•-?.2' ,a{7 r u! rrr•.:a1 rT't iaa 1; �♦''.�' y2t{ b� �"".y "� �� � s 6�iw,}py� o� r -:�•t'•�;e: Rq��>w�rt �Sr� ��+c�, uyr"--t'�'� y�.,v !. .•.a�'ys,l,�i�,��3n'�"�'y�°'r` s�war�: a��rr tV�yT�,..`�4y.,'{,>�+h�•�.����,Fiaa •s l"�uii>,{i;.ts�Rlt.''^"••."svL"-C-I TaC a� s+o�-S�'.h ai 3.�imv345!kH 4f.1•'�E♦t•;''y,lyS N Uert ^NM3 s®rr'r q'l ris}Lr yc�A§`,^�sET��1A r'rt+'..?.�p.,�-..,Lia"%4'6',v"�'a yi�'Mi1�`v,1r�'*'}-r�t`'''�`�,'L�^l r t�'�FK i r4 r k^}F l,r YF,•+.JC+:,J-.t;'.S.�.'"�r'�x�R'gry�u m fi'$��✓'.s.c. C S �'s-` �a'S'Y�,v^ci'•=Y✓.f?'a"�x k9�-.+•/;4�•a'f s�"y��^','c.`'R Se+l}f��t§_Hy�'yheL;4N'wT+.+.�'�_��S 'r <p t,"` Sa �A>.s°�TF > y�'ty; 1iy. A" �a �4 ,. • A "fi`f' .y£ T il .3,. + ti``pp 3 a, ; $y:{++!!F.��ta ,Si[�fir y sb L'i 'r!! 7i•t .2 T 7' wWi..". &'"spcb.'1 �+.•p�lS � ���C�a'rYh y �. yy��W �$p.�t`it� c3 a.� i�+'�•rRfi..rli tt M W �^ ";4 y'�'i �Tt-s� A M1l'^�H�' •.r-�51�^1�.1 '�3irt��. 'n..•YL �dW.! ����+TMf.�F ��•acA�"" r ..J-#fri5�'al�T.if 'SL�aM tsar �s`tS�+oW��Y;}'�.' Z��b���d>•�{v C rk L�t$"mfwt y, �1Nf . :.Z•a.�..yt,.v�jr "'•�s,}�ar*�'}-y'te ,t�ia. n �� 'z�'TV�y s'd„ ..a .�F T c� 'iasR,t• �`"'��`�i a'♦x�- b 'F .'sv 1 '�p397,,�. "4"i RT<t �4. .y ��',r�`Yrp°k` ..tt�✓$zy„a °te ' +L4 ,gyp r`#� z-�r'' L � ���„f�S�FSY+ '�`� '� {�+ �t� aa.�"�'"?�,�"i`•`w'�� °"�`{�S+ �« i, �` eFSt'�a!��' :-•< rr ��'1>`°W!c as`Y'its.'t>!ky"-*>f'�`` F.�' '�'_.t. ���'�:r"�y^`".��€t. •" Ja:^ , 9.r ",�xa;.,z �"�ss`iy'`i'F>�>�`r�.:.'..�r •.t��t�t v.?,�"F"' ,-2 .7''ks-v?� �=� .�, .� w ^ � l' a ar'T -w.- 5 P]4'.w, x'" �"gx ixf � �a?�:�i-�`��'Si7' x3 •_ '��`�-zc�'M. 'a Atka" '`k>z-.i;1N 've'"^ ;= � t ��,"'�s >' rrt s. , .7' ar r �' 'fit r •,�'� � 1-e '^u .S Yh� •5: • WARNER W. HOWL OOM HEART BAR RANCH,AR0.0ml1F/.O SPRINGS Pon omCE eox 9146 SAN BERNARDINO.GU¢ORNIA 11106 (714)911.1547 TEIFgOW: April 12, 1993 Mr. AI Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bernardino Planning Department 300 North "D" Street,Third Floor San Bernardino, California 92418-0001 RE: Sterling Heights/Sterling Avenue Supplemental EIR Pre-ERC/DRC Meeting, Tuesday April 6, 1993 1. 1/3 cost each for Primary/Secondary Access I DFG Non-Attendance of ERC/DRC April 8 and 15 1993 meeting 3. Explicit Mitigation and Performance Standards 4. City Little Sand Canyon Mitigation Lands 5. City/BLM and USFS Consolidation Act Lands 6- December 18, 1992 DFG and Corp. Pemiit Process 7. Schematic Landscape/Mitigation Plan and Cost Dear Mr. Boughey: Thank you for having the above referenced pre-ERC/DRC meeting on Tuesday, April 6, 1993 1 PM. Other attendees were Greg Gubman, Associate Planner, Tom Dodson, City Planning Consultant, Mayor Holcomb, Aaron Hodgdon (RSA), Jack VanderWoude/Mark Landers (Sterling Heights), The basic purpose was to generally review Mr. Dodson's response to the comments received regarding the SEIR. They would have been presented to the ERC at their Thursday, April 8, 1993 9 AM meeting. As Dedicated Sterling Avenue and the Secondary Access is an integral reference of the SEIR, you fast ratified and everyone present re-confirmed, that the cost thereof would be funded through an Assessment District Structure. The basis being applicable 1/3 each (Sterling Heights, City and Secret Hollow Ranch) after a benefit cost allocation to EVWD for Dedicated Sterling Avenue and the 3 to 6 million gallon new reservoir site east thereof. The existing EVWD reservoir site and access to the south will be removed and abandoned by the District. The assessment District Structure is subject to Sterling Heights/Secret Hollow Ranch and the City/EDA final concurrence. By letter dated April 2, 1993 your staff confirmed it's prior discussion with the Department of Fish and Game (DFG). As they did not plan on attending the April 8, 1993 ERC meeting, you wrote the DFG by letter dated April 7, 1993 and which ratified the meeting would be continued to April 15, 1993 to accommodate their attendance. HERBAGE OF THE MOUNTAM AND VAISEy BEGAN W ISSO (}J OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 2M6,ARRO�SPRNGS,SAN eERNARDWO,CALffORNN 91406 (�} RESIDENCE MANNG:5195 BROADMOOR BOUI£VARD,SAN B£RNARDWO,(AISFORMA 924W,914)995 4151 A.AR AV Hop . ,Ayp,y CROVY Ali➢JATE Page 2 (See attached April 2, 1993 Planning letter to DFG RE:ERC meeting April 8, 1993) (See attached April 7, 1993 Planning letter to DFG RE:ERC Meeting April 15, 1993) On April 6, 1993 Mr. Dodson explained that DFG requested Mitigation Lands could be provided in the SEIR either as "Explicit" or by "Performance Standards" i.e.. exact acreage or by example 3:1 Ratio. However, though more or less mitigation land may ultimately be required, it was determined that the SEIR "Performance Standards" would expedite the City/Planning approval process as the mitigation area could be determined at a later dated with the DFG during the 1601-1603 Process and Agreement. Determining the "Explicit" Mitigation area up front with DFG, though requiring more specifies at this time, could result in requiring less land, but of more comparable value. The 1601-1603 process provides for arbitration should the applicant and DFG not be able to reach an equitable agreement. Mayor Holcomb observed, but not limited to, that Fault Areas found on the contiguous City/EDA Little Sand Canyon property (168.73 acres) could act as appropriate Mitigation Lands to off-set any overall Dedicated Sterling Avenue area considerations. This urban development land was the exchanged to the City from the U.S. BLM. As you know, at the City Engineers, funding and permit process meeting on December 18, 1992 RSA felt that the City should immediately initiate the DFG 1601- 1603 Permit Process and the Corp. Nationwide Permit process for Dedicated Sterling Avenue. This would have concurrently accomplish two goals along with the time required for the Supplemental EIR process; (1) the explicit Landscape/Mitigation Plan, and (2) put the DFG and Corp. On-Notice that the City's intent was always to adhere to their joint required regulatory process. "Explicit and/or "Performance Standards for Mitigation Land: Patent Land and City Land fronting Dedicated Sterling Avenue by: U.S. Land: The City Land (168,73 acres) along Dedicated Avenue was received as part of a Land Exchange with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management on April 15, 1974. The City land received by the BLM (USFS) was located approximately 15 miles northwesterly of the City along Cajon Canyon. The City land was an isolated ownership in Cajon Canyon, while the USFS (BLM) exchange land along Sterling Avenue, except the northeast 1/4 section, was surrounded by existing urban areas, existing homes and contiguous developable private lands, Therefore, the USFS (BLM) divested itself from their Sterling Avenue Urban Developable Land by giving the City a U.S. BLM Land Patent pursuant to "An Act to consolidate National Forest lands." Quote: "Now know ye, that there is,therefore,granted by the United States unto the above (City of San Bernardino) named claimant lands above described; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said lands with all the rights, privileges, immunities, and appurtenances, of whatsoever nature, thereunto belonging, unto said claimant,and to it's successors, for v r, HERBAGE OF TS{£MOIRSEAINS AND VALLEY REGAN R21R50 (� OMADQOARTrR 9 OFFICE WX 21K.ARRO9hOAD SPRINGS.SAN RERNARDFNO,CALIFORNIA 91,06 ( 7 RESIDENCE MAMI :5195 RROADMOOR boVIEVARD,SAN RE"--O,CALIFORNIA 92,M.PH)R83,M 53 •c (MR t NOOCOON D1 GION I.R1llATC Page 3 EXCEPTING AND RESERVING TO THE UNITED STATES from the lands so granted a right-of-way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States" (See attached April 14, 1974 U.S.Land Patent to the City of San Bernardino RE:Sterling Avenue 168 acres) (See attached April 1, 1974 City of San Bernardino Certificate of Acceptance) (See attached Plate map of City Property and Dedicated Sterling Avenue) On May 31, 1974 a City Grant of Easement (4 acres) was recorded to the EVWD for Pipelines, Reservoirs etc. (City U.S. Patent Land). This easement will be abandoned upon removal of the existing reservoir and a new 3 to 6 million gallon reservoir and main facilities are constructed east of Dedicated Sterling Avenue. The City did not as yet own fee title to the U.S. Lands when the easement documents were first prepared The City may Grant Fee Title and Access to EVWD for the new Reservoir site and Water/Main Facilities. Said Access and Reservoir Site will be along and east of Dedicated Sterling Avenue. Said benefit to EVWD of the new elevation 1530 site, Dedicated Sterling Avenue access and applicable pipeline facilities R/W will be assessed to EVWD as a cost therefore and, allocated per the residual on a 1/3 cost basis through an Assessment District Structure as outlined under paragraph 2 herein. (See attached recorded May 31, 1974 City Grant of Easement to EVWD,Plate map) On May 31, 1974 a City Grant of Easement (15.4 acres) was recorded to the San Bernardino County Flood Control along Little Sand Canyon. The City reserved the right to use said land for compatible recreational purposes etc. The Flood Control has the right (and has constructed) to construct appurtenant structures for the purpose of confining, storing and conserving waters for the purpose of excavating, widening, deepening and otherwise rectifying any artificial or natural channel etc. (See attached recorded May 31, 1974 City Grant of Easement to the SBCFC) On May 31, 1974 a City Grant of Easement was recorded to Gilbert C. Van Camp (now Sterling Heights) for an easement for a roadway for ingress and egress, including a pillar for a gate and fencing along Dedicated Sterling Avenue and north of Foothill Drive. (See attached recorded May 31, 1974 City Grant of Easement to Gilbert C.Van Camp) It is the understanding of RSA that Richard Pope & Associates, Landscape and Urban Design, is preparing for the City/EDA a Sterling Avenue Area primary and secondary access Schematic Landscape/Mitigation Plan. This will include an existing Sycamore evaluation, schedule and cost estimate of Trees (Sycamore, Alder, Pepper, Eucalyptus) and plant species with irrigation and fire resistant considerations. As you know, a Landscape/Mitigation Plan was required as part of the City initial 1/22/86 conditions applicable to Dedicated Sterling Avenue and the Bonita Vista Drive secondary access. The final Engineering Plans therefore were approved for construction by the City and recorded 1/22/86. Mr. Pope's professional services were previously concurred in at the various joint City/Property owners meetings and paid for through the Assessment District Structure on a 1/3 basis each. HERR.3oE OE i9tE MOVHrAINS MID VM y mcQ w I130 HEADQUARnRS:r OEFlCE a0%11K.AaaOWMAD ygaif.`S.SAN IEMN TNO.CAtnoa 91M6 (�) aE$IDEVCE M�:3293 no MO aoV VAaD,S,N aEaHARDPIO,UIIEORHIA 9xAO. OIAI 093 4133 A iARN[A<,NOpGpON 9A,.IpT GIlW1 AIIIlI/.R Page 4 The Schematic Landscape/Mitigation Plan should more than cover applicable mitigation lands addressed under the Sterling Heights/Avenue March 1993 SEIR. The Sterling Avenue Landscape/Mitigation Corridor parallels Sterling Heights lots and fault lands to the west, but also encompasses more extensive areas along the east non- developable lands. Considering the long term lack of habitat areas along the prior and existing Dedicated Sterling Avenue roadway, and the eight contiguous Wildfires during the summer of 1993 that burned down hundreds of trees, the Schematic Landscape/Mitigation Plan will more than represent an improved corridor for consideration. Sincerely, Warner r W. Hodg5 1 Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Greg Gubman,Associate Planner Tom Dodson,City Consultant Dan McKinney,Esq. HERITAGE OF THE MOUNSAINS AND VALLEY REGAN IN 1150 OHEADQUARTERS:IOST OFFICE RO%216,ARRO91¢AD SPRINGS,SAN BERNARDINO.USIFORNIA 9106 RESIDENCE MAMING. 1293 RROADMOOR RONIEVARD,SAN BERNARDINO.GAI2FORN192 W,(7H)963L153 WW A a'FFMR R.N.. f AYM1Y GRON ARRIAT[ NAR e? _ 5 _= C I T Y O F } A _.!F DEI f! San Bernardino N ` .a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND EUILCING SERVICES A L 8 0 U G H E Y . A I C P D I R E C T O R April 2, 1993 Fred Worthley Regional Manager Department of Fish and Game 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50 Long Beach, CA 90802 RE: Sterling Heights SEIR Dear Mr. Worthley: On March 26, 1993 I spoke to Mike McBride pertaining to the comments that your office was submitting for the Sterling Heights SEIR. We are reviewing the comments and preparing responses prior to our Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finalizing their recommendation on the SEIR on April 8, 1993. We anticipate completing our responses on April 5, 1993 and will send you a copy as soon as possible. Captain McBride indicated that someone from your office might attend the ERC meeting. We feel that it would be beneficial to the ERC if your office did attend. The ERC is responsible for making recommendations to the decision making bodies on environmental determinations. The purpose of this letter is to request confirmation of attendance by your office. If you or your designee are unable to attend on April 8, 1993, we will continue the item until April 15, 1993 so that your office may be there. Please confirm who will attend and on which date we can expect you. The ERC meetings are held in the 4th floor conference room here at City Hall at 9:00 a.m. If you have any comments, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, {/ C" Valerie C. Ross Acting Principal Planner cc: Al Boughey, City of San Bernardino, Director of Planning and Building Services Henry Empeno, City of San Bernardino, Deputy City Attorney PRIDE 3 0 0 N O A T H . 0 S T R E E T . S q N 8 E R N A . O 1 N 0 . IN PROGR8SS �!C g L I F 0 q N 1 q 9 2 t 1 6 - 0 0 J t O f 1 1 3 ! 5 0 > 1 /5 0 3) C I T Y o f ��n Fjern�rdino OBrA11TUAMT Of PLANNING All IOILOIMO •T IIVICKI A L 9 0 U G H E Y . A I C P 0 111 ! 0 7 0 A April 7, 1993 Fred Worthley, Regional Manager Region 5 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50 Long Beach, CA 90802 RE: STERLING HEIGHTS SEIR Dear Mr. WorNoy: I have been advised, through telephone discussions between my staff and Captain Mike McBride, that DFG does not plan to attend the City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) meeting—originally scheduled for Thursday, April 8, 1993 at 9:00 a.m.--to discuss the comments and responses regarding the above referenced SEIR. 1 feel that DFG's presence at the ERC meeting is important to communicate the issues involved in the environmental review process for this project. Therefore, I have proposed a one-week continuance of the ERC meeting to allow.your staff additional time to review our proposed responses to the SEIR comments and to accommodate the presence of a DFG representative, If another date and/or time would be more convenient, please notify us and we Nu attempt to facilitate your attendance. If it is your decision not to attend the ERC meeting, I would appreciate it if you could drop me a note so advising. Thank you for your attention in this matter, if you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 384-5057. Sincerely, AJ Y, A d Building Services cc: Capt. Mike McBride PRIDE IN PROt3 SS a 0 O N O A T N D 8 T P E E T , 6 A N B E R NAP D i N O , C A L 1 f O a N 1 A 1 2 4 1 B - 0 0 0 1 (7 1 4 1 )x 4 . 1 0 711 0 0 0 T -I... w "V, -W.M r+ {A zt My w 0 flv ._74 IM M IM V,7g% -A' M, M OEM MR. MR "g gY�R PON 41 it,71 ®R ;401or ffz '?� 4 - 3-, Z�� - 2 C4, A>R�ROM M w pLy 4%, AIX _R' Ml Nt, OE .4 NY f '54F�M op YM :FM fe,Mw" R -rw- W Yi W-455 'ea—ul �N ......... .....tG ............. 'f4 WX\sr' F'7 Zk;R iR Im 47 7. R M, W .;Aj ZIA. W- *w4 B1 .SJ 'MMUMORI W 44 -en S.V'Rit -_41 OWN .41 1�'g"4'x :71 5p"gh MOM iN M ;MW --i,- %"f. MEMO Al, gr nwo MOSM RIM I Will gg_ ffil Ail MIR _'Q SZ;W k;'M. Aw, um IN LI.ILI. Ry. 7X, Mu o,.NPW�ev h 1 rti +w.1VI. C P.0 8442 i iq 177 c�"TFJCATC or AC�. TAWCF C�o Section %.. 27261) ...TA, e"I(y that the jot....t 1. the ra.1 proerty, conn,oy.d Thf* to to by a Land Patent dated febmarY IS. 1974 fro,a The United State- of order of �rjca to the Cl," of San he"ardim 1. hereby mcce�tcd by it. pfay.r and ..ntil on and the gr."t.. 4 y ton&ants to the recordAtIon thereof by it. dvlv authortsed atfictr.is 4 Dated: MH co,a Mayor tij 4 le 2 WE A ■ f «\ i ou � \ §\ � q {! % a f / 60 q 2 ° . I I I O S <�\ ; �@ _ tisJa .t(fr y •Yf dx),. �✓ Sar "o•�? fi i !) +`+{43^'v..y "x ls, y. in.n a f i 2.c/ a y .,s-.,. .v 3= v L ) rut '�. ^y t Va: i-"f.+ Y) L t �5f e;�a Aaji^C . •...� �ayx+ v.y� tic4tiM ? +}a>3 . +. 3< '+'+��.a_e�._twl:'aa'€°'tr 'wr'.�c.•• y F 'L: ar � .t � x.Cr�a 2'. G �Yr sn`ww.«L,+••"^•�.�i' T A't Ala. ..i•,'•F'.;".' 7Kai L' ! ZZ� ar*,w�4?r-•x`z1;yK N'z.'+� -.ewaLsyj sti!!}'.4LOCvt..?` .:..w«,i`o r:•inr:!-r^:'iv e.Ite�p�'et �>\'" a=sA !'• r r a., tot } V"' i. • �a• •TI•J'tP..ry Y��:i. •• • • �•.Y.��fiWs^_i Fes'" r•!ieY^j���� v sNy{.4y EM.r :sir'•�^•` 9 .t dM'i2k i� ••t.�I.- nTv�y..st1_ s afy LL , .$ i " ��vi•^mad •a'w•i:sl '+•y.'<' ie;�`-�_+'�-Y.^mod Y �t rS�f-•�' ! "•Erb SAX .;Y era'c,�'� r• T" :aY7s�j :ice"--yam•-J"",vV_er4:�� = Ssv'!S �Jl'i r3 r• � `r Kv r, >, fir. y�vo � :311•: -a= "'r q.• s S i r "A loy Wo- S. Q f A wilp.."ji ,V ASN 40. . ..... AS "m f :i:17,'•.: ' . i .. ". . ..; r- : -•.mac:•` OF- Z�• t SAN BEPNARDINO COUNTY :•: 'F` • FLOOD CaNIRC1.DISTINCT P.O.Boa 1318 �; . . g 4R 8wnnrdlro_GllfaaA gtofR ...I REC011 IN 011 RECORDS .. . ((11tt ;^-fefaee etdar 147Z•49-DMO JI) By ylfENb TIRE INSURANCE C.O. .•1,"'., AW Rwew weceaoaa w.rc•o MAY 311974 AT $�O A.hI. '?+ - r _.SMN BOWANDIND COUNTY , . V. DEMOS WARD'-e- %e"L •'f «,w FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Aaora p 'uN ERK-RLCOROFq P.O.Saw 1318 emwutw col CALIF- ca"a San Bereanflm.Cafflmaia 91402 . - L atanL J B SP•CE Anal TMs 4wE FOR R4:4:00 RS USE EASEMENT For and In consideration of the benelits to be darwod br the vnde slef ed by the eslablistwent and main- - famins,of Flood Control and Water Coos iioa facilities,and for ohm stumble consideration, the undersigned, CM OF SAN BEPNAll as mnlc Lpal corporation do at hrreby orant to the SAt!BERNAPDINO COUNTY FLOG^ CONTROL DISTRICT, a body politic and co,a ate. a pspetwl eanement for Ill conlrol and w w mane Vatinn faaltoses in, over, upon and across Ilw folhrwlr dosalbod tad property shunts In on Cou-ty d Gn B•+rvwd.m,Sdtn N Cslllame,towdi: That portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 190 Tonmehip I North, Range 3 Heat, San Bernardino Meridian, described as follows: (: ) • Beginning At a point in the South line of said Nortl.west quarter of said C'^ Section 19, distant along said South line, North 89' 45' 25" Vest, 615.00 foot froa the Southeast corner of saki Northwest quarter; thence along asid South line, North $4- 45' 25" Heat, 705.00 Ill thence North 0. 34' 20" Heat, 590,00 feet; throne North 57' S1' 40" East, 425.00 feet; thence South 0' 34' 20" East, 307.64 feet; thence South 89' 45' 15" East, 310.00 feet; '] thence North 72' 53' 26" Eeat, 675.74 feet to .• point in the East Iine Of said Northwest qu- •ter of said Section 19, distant long said Eas[ line, North 0' 34' 20" Hest, 711.56 Ill fr.. the Southeast corner of uLd Ilorthl vest fiyA Ts^r� st quarter; thence along Bald East line, South 0' 34' 20" East, 271.56 -11 q feet; thence South 54' 23' IJ" Wcat, 751.08 feet to the point of beginning.`.- iS. Containing 13.457 acres, more or less. IMSERVINC unto the Creator herein, its -successors and aeaill the right to usu said land for compatible recreational purposes, provided hwever, that prior to v Y development, plane for such proposed u.es shall first be approved in writing , Little Sand Channel Parcel No. 28 1•. OP 2.500/71 3E712112002 12-17-71 (2) CI w� at-nau�n M.y p L 1 3 g. c 6x.8442 t u Yb5 n pit%'?`.a�+.� 77 't►y,the Flood Control Engineer of said Diatdct, which approval aha/1 not be withheld, T :.i in the opinion of said Flood Control Engineer, said oroposed Vasa do not I ' 'r ataueoably conflict with, interfere with or endanger the functional operation . ' CZ the Districts Little Sand Creek Channel and bath facilities. r 4 r 1' R « • h rit I r.: M R K-� « « • �u R � �E s 1� 4 R h. Sheet 2 of 3 sheets i� ut. :e:rA?r, eoo,8442 r M a h I R. ., ' .•.,.� : -•a.:f.i:,. ,3}s.•� kt ash ilw uasanrnant herein pmMnd shad incl•dn: the-iGhl lu ea...:ruel.roematrrct, impeet.Alntain and nbpak ! , -.7 sl i- - d c.••dipi.. sn«I and .• . .•+r �.,...;+:•: flood Contnol and/« 'all eonservahon works aM a[„��sla-d sinCASC_fa the n Cmservitg watons: the right in enner .Tan aM fu (..ss and nspaxs eve+ and sloop said lard:the light to depoalt. �- t- -` tools;implements and other materials I,e eon and to take therefrom and'o,Place lheteon earth. rock, sard and ... _ praval f« the Punpo-e of e-Ca a-Uag, wihninp.o e nenino and olhetw'is,nectifying any artificial « natural chan- _ net aid f« the �rlsiruction, nainfenance, and repair d said floW wxral and/o,wale caosenwtnm v+vks and _ -�A appunanaM strvciwea,Said rights ate to bn :aenelsed try said 77strict, its officers,apeMS and emplc.ynes•W aY parsons«der Cow,,, i with it and lhoir ermloy,res,whe«nver and whtrover necessary,f« flood control and watts Con laMtim P«poses. ::y It Is «dtrstoW that each Of the unde.siprted gram«s Fa^ls only. an portion d ant above described lard .k - whieh is owned by said Fam_:- « in which said Fanfor has an iMaen, and that by granting this<a semmt,the ; nnd«rigned Fanten have MI avrveycd any title to the waters so confined and Conserved. Ay i TO HAVE AND TO 41(7LD. tner:her with tM right 1.do nil things necessary 10 be done f«the Purposed ;W Condining o,croservig wet«s which fall.flow ne are c.vducted into said right of wry. :•i..'. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF this ca sr.w.M is sights arts aar<utW thiz day of 4, . 79_ tr. otcam � May r of the City of son BurJardino ; l a C RESOLUTION On motion of Supervise —.d:rly sec'«ded by sad Gtfind unslninrars lY.the Irarnwanit n•s•Aulua, i•..rhYaM,ani nnhn Mae': BE IT RESOLVED, IN&-,-_ -..._dal d_—, ___ . w_,tw ihn Baud sal SMaw«ns of thn son Bentardinw Ctwnly FUrd Control O•sha:l-Stall d Cal"n't'l-Mal lie Fats d easaemnt Iron to the San B-m+ddino C«mty Flnnd Cmtrol OM,lei.Slate. of Calif«nia, he. i d it is teraby nary.llod,fm the P« - poses.aW immli«w as th,roin set i,.to:ants BE O FURTHER RMXVED.that a leltiliM cns'ry M nu. nl nd,nimn N•+ttacMd to said casenv:nt and that the said MfU«ront he retondM in tMn dlicn M its+ Ctvmly fkx:,rd:y M iho Ctwmy d Son Betnandi,u.Stall'of Call- fomla,and tiled in the ccods of this STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUMy OF SAN BERNARDItg0 n} ' I• ____, S]:rolirty M tiv(kMA•a 5,4M(V,aMZ of (MI Stn B']I1MIdlnO CWnly F ltm Control Dis Ui,:t. San 2vnud,nn Carty. Cn14 .niw. h•Y•iry c•alit. Ihn fnv,p j{ l to In a loll. Um and Teri entry of thu rc,.(minn nc•aytfnq its• a inn N... J. Da"d u....r..v a me ma.n of fluwt c 1C--n..I l at rM Olatrict •.:��:. v sr, 3 a 3,__ sw,e.•.,,,.nw�G.,m,r.�nli h.•nin "aF�'iiq No n 6 -vt 4�}rr,4 tl1 s�K�T'd a „�� :, a�+ 1 . :t✓�T.�"�) �K'c:w.ry . 1 ;.a�,t .: t' ..�ti R ':aYrVF�ur 1. t S °• rN dab'+. 'iFa�vti=:ice Ale, 14.LSJF. eK�. ST� L 4 rIV.Y P�F�?e t F F4 S A" a ♦ � E't .+• aP' ...'Vay,`ar Y-•�4'�'>y�y'r� F .-3'\ wp w a hV �.:a.ty -1-:,. - x ,x? a C rsS re T ..ts•'"k � L i '�.}.: t� ,L y��3i` f cCw`i xs.?1` ..r w ,,vs�.t�y. '"# Ja 1 �tY �q, '"S# •r '13- ,.a rys ty sMa`Ti�-{'^k.v vt'it sr:a-•n .XrlS rrrt ri x,.,nRr1)r\•th'N<S"' c2'SvrL".NS -°t�` °f";.1!,.Dt.Z Cs &L'yrY :�ktrt.. +`a> +. Zt.2•tzy,°7 x. >»�. . P 3< C+ ,c` a k'.fi-. •K e.J. b'bJ.s '1'7 •r3. � �\d'.r�'� k�r i s'Yr a .Y{�^y'�' y'rs.�! „n M aR`;yf:;o-�S M���`�X T�,rLZ3.'''�C �,� - S a �L.. �S3�.r.>��T.-µ>�j ar=;•ik ;E J'.�.5"{,1s•ir'.,,�y'RF'�+y�s ta� 1016"21 `2C � , •,'a .R �,' t �'y�$°�r" tl;",e2 r'`✓"S�-'�".ircr��SYn��' .st7t :e Y ��SYii.A�yt. R ..y�ae'$ 'Ci; s.T>•`y, {'r+c's�' T•` {G n k y�v,�'.r''e•.� >'�, ?5syi• if n A %:�t �€.�. :;�r<s ;rr,wgwi;N;r'e"k 'r-` �� y � �"��^R' s�W�*� 'r°.r.T "�yt�`t.+�•�ta Y"' rrzrdV,�: '.�+�"�'.. s, Mail, ta "> s'YR ,r z�- rte- '�•c.. �YLz•��i'`�.t ` f� -•. >i'r�rj ^'f'r.wl"�•ul -O.y,*�. yt3a xjyw+c.�x3 -w+! :rSk° `y1 5' �A,rp'' ; ,k' a l.4`�� •'?v'+9�'tyL,s,�,a a•.x:>�f. \"a .v .�EL'$san1n:{�yc7M12Y.�9*k1'a}y;( R. .y�>aTfresc`L° dtw� if�.. w+rYi ..A t .: ;ryrx �is'a.F' i�st'n `!cyaiil wY' `t' ':i tkiM.j.£ > A y•m �Y C�Srlu 6r`R,� i�YL!}v .�K 1T1a h -^ �-•Ti'•J�i ^r a.,t/�"-.i 4,y`�'4,. •I,.y}.. ;7v - •r.CZ+s33" •g{l av •.`?Ai'- WE- w ,E� F`` x�ry ' Xq^-er�? l�r Sr ist.��??� ta' ° "'F,rbrv�" k"v ,re',<.fl<^a+5r �•v:-eY'",tr�cG-tr°3S'.4. 'tsx roar i w „Pia •x �+kk. z� ��'r(`r :tt} r ` ).Ya' "*' y ++t r i is .yzyt' °k; •aJg{ t esW row,• '+^. "�� .a �'r3. t- e: '�vt°'f "rnf, qtr ! { i P t��> ?I T i'F'` 'at31 s.• .s y,r T a v}"� • .! a- ti '„.GFr 3 s -wl'i>tiav 1ra+r� ''. t f^. 4 rwsta3r, a a'Y` -fy'*s iL.I 'Y 1 .1• t Y e7 'T 1. T n > � � Wa`. ^n> S F y�� '-r1irt� r ('+Rat+t� 1,n.33Y..rr >K' •n.3t,. s l.. )+� c3,r><i, „-t.*L,St"'+.iF �75 t3AY -"YF••. +L'x' .,a#.�,n.y�"��i� ��90`^� .a..5fx "�'^�a�f+wy�'}+�.cy���rsr�V�K a�L�"�.d'u'�S. v .�,Y°w tky .�Y�4xx�yy� > .t Y3���r�• ' .stet raj a� �...wc,'°T�' s�K I�y,'es� .tt�}r'6'4hi�c � .�tg4'+k�`.�,�,(ry.'�•f��.�i'Pr,.,�a.nw�4i4hy�La`r'�`bra'<cr'F�}i't`�k�cT^.ktr�r^,;�.. wv �yiAp .if>-�S ,.wyl.ra tr> FL'a r L"r s ' �- 'j' -'"tiu 'ara&iw ryq ssret.f� 4s,�{ " r'"�.'-S•z"t�f°rq,s4yrth"a`F"° r y f {tF�✓ bL j 6 .r .c.L i '>2 a-I wF'..✓ Sa !" S',�'3 7� a 'i�rf' ify'2< `."yf�,y".V �ar;A•}ss}wata�,}Y"'Er s�-.r�•mf ,S Fr. "i. h..�a�•+' efa "'�."`}t.x� '�^a "fi .? .c 44 Vbn- N La'YkK.? +(}'4;a .g 25 -`' lk`v4>♦xk.t..F•.. :r' C•f t r k°f y o 3" al.ars sa+ .rrj 4� w t z tNYr ynt ...-?^ zv +,r,,,. +, M s w,r v r 4. r tFt s.a Fsg a.'F. i' ) ;a. '\ +Kr Kd w ah'7, t d-° 'S• r a<S Y• { ;F j r^k' r as •G4^tk '. ' G,-'- -a a�.' i i11,a.}R't �a•_:(h>✓alsi1 ! rst-� .� aY r' �'p'✓+"1 a4�y3aJ-� � .y t�r r�.rr' G jz•rv't,>L�SS. '' �r�aah'..• ��>' rkt`yyr.*.. .!a Mr)/ $1k h •S y�atm�,, '�" +il s::c` sr °3f^y^ .,..tli! frf z 3�343,zis "p •! s#d.' cFirt�`S�` o' ts" , f rd ai'+.na'Y,i. srt 3Y 1; 4 " .$`7' " 3., r .0 #s1'1 ry a..&. , a`" '�' }<rX.�'Sw;..�7.' 'S .sr> '-.P�``<�, r�k�` aG� ,TVr xz -<8ri,>a'� 7.'•a"`��_: rr P y> r � `?:*"':.> :" at 3�Y `� ' r� .'.. o- a..�1F�evicf,M k n4c,lf.:' ,a a°yF"st�F'+k ."Fss r >Y"'._ Ik, •a, ..+ ii a.y# Y' a .4 2•K +. +:-•s. 3 w aq P`v ^CJ7�-a of 3-F'.Y-a f? ,.a L� }xaY`Y:.`t".+fa.4a.`+ f-: �;'.�i'ii ,��2�a` n. �„`$i� 'K.G •xy ,•'A. �".Cf,�"r'��y 7s ,*z"Ksn+4cst<+tgr'7"�Ca •,.l �(43. �;�j''s y `n ir23` a Crfa' :.-aJ'°'aF `-'t- t r.:� .< ?` r 1' 4+ 3F4r r1 L��za aoty"#;tr r��*'"^�r ✓; ,�".eS� f i �. .na-•,� #a y' yYt1'n`x,,.Ka ,,l�,y ''^�" '�s,•a-ytC� c 't •r bt + V?,fi b°»g N-t-.rs'i y..�i��^,ll'Y �.t x' a>•$'l"if x ei a."<•4 i>: x�''+ ? 'F "Y.tj ,.Cba,Y e��,.,#-3i ;atX d`�ys++ ta':] 'Y° iic.� ''''£ .51•A'bae<t4 T, >'Jna 't ..r-�u"`.@�"• ww. a�Y � �. '.f 1„ a r 4a<.Sye T as i?v ` '� "4v-:'-r">✓t1•a-SVGAL �� fyrd"4'4Ts '-�.n s :-a 1 a � '.0 >�.,.•'i n �,.,rtx �'� .L. .r 1- �' •c* �?°> - 4 r � : �'*'�i-2'3 + y�x r +:r t rrY,,-+ .�' x�„�'1 t � a d are,. � 1 ;s�•...�#,,;rkLye> r s . ss''a? >r..i FnF••r""r>+f •sa"',}.'tl t�+ <�,_n'+�, rM A i ^+''?x r F','-.f La% W.rG 4 1- v.2 vv�(,"!`1"'� 'nr .1'r fr'.'..s.`t �'> 7 ��xi�"ri ^ `°-•> C:f="?" Id vdi-•'z •z r`r•%:1�y aan rx-�'�f$F.�,i ,'..M.Y ,ti,, as3r "' z'1 „Awc cLx��. * u a} > �.e""SK,yoP.� I'd y + t tre-tk r�Yl °r bw SY'vJ-a� a u3 Lja4i �-s ✓.3 'fay T t<r a e,�J i qc.p^S ey r�-r k...f' � �.- Y .s+.}'�-a x `h- $\,�1..e f w4 Gt.+-` .�a' M:t+r r� 5 5 � Y .a�f u r`i.•� �A v Y..a�,SX..l r..F, '�Y i c Sta- < 3 va-,} �a.- �A ur. . n o� a'k'fA ft w.• "F F K i R.,,- >,„t�,7 y- T.qt Y rx>�°k rT �' i->?1 '9->�3t- ) ,,+.a '��✓ w r'� �l p. rr :.ayds�. *it nz t} ��'e+•�•tJ �y5.. �kt r�,lt 32'} p�x s�.l 'iY3 q;y1�.�v e `aka•"k i�'w� 'fi •,.��CY'`�','s�. Y it raa+'«r cri :a �.[.. r •F4 ;.+j L>,ir .4=tr' p'Ft ,. v.S>r � ea3•�L:.e , i.rte- ,�y` s. "z -SL's' L^.yvhY�- r u}N't4 ri y,- ✓ "`.z� -L F^7'tat,;kd4x�`Y�`+�'.a '� i. S l;Ctf'1s.`4ROr' •> f v°-:Ft '�,:{;wr�ta�'^`3e:,'r' Ya•-. -i l'`v y4r {v-{�-»' °� Yc t, > i!. ,.1.1`+'d�rir�,<r?S \ a' '^ .•. +'. `n`.�" rte.. sf ( o ' wr.:w r+�' s 't.fit' t x 4.. .>.�YY t4 -a.X e+TC� r.- � �r i3> fi, 7 �pt.T T c�. �.. "" Y k y,)M lar?aNf'14K�.�.. rj `£ (,-.> k f a�i fir•.-,/' s i a.�y< (,n L vt.<l tdljCt .r fa`""+. L• • 'L $4.t••F.n.a.r A• R 5 4, f-r1/+ 'fie"- isx"4.j.,•S.`•"v'sC �'»}%" t �� a w-a..o-- -+-t•>� ,"r. y^" .sJ 1 L 4Ct i L�• Y"' a 3P 7..P a e ja.LtY a` '`y^'Y'1 q tom. IK i`r ARI4y�r[-:fLY+e T`Pr Y-'L +tirrx .t• 3+F>•. > + Q: .y f1 ��' f i 5a TSS JrrY r}Se'r'f u t4 > `a .✓.. , ... y ' 't.-r •�`l. v > 2 is.iat s r- w• .p � ''k,•-n*.. \r }.• . r ,fit 4`{{ v y-(:a .Yrw t ,� �rscd-tta. icrrx'� t rt x r•r t ii 37 r N r �X cx� a n+ 7 w4.t4f" Ft \a d �. "' y :3...•1 eXi w� t '.i y s,�'+s r � rt L 'a •4�f' kv r�'tn 3-r S tr > ''frwi.T z.cs• 'T ci tom' T S.•j3st'+. r 3.t sy +•L� �,.: r •' �.>`.t�1f.+-1.F ? y1'�.,i j,Ty {' psy- t t-°Y..� �-`f�r >' tK ` 'r✓' 5- F k t r Y+.L-.y$ `"v 3.•rp2t�» v} - g 1 ✓ 5 Ca `'Y iT ar4 r , 7s< r < .> .# .a` rtk w4 a�.A•n .,iT.. `Sy LL R TS'J yr. '}.'T Y••+ 'y} N•u• °F. V i SC (Ni p ro. Y. .y �} r+ t4`' +T,jwx rNxF W d 1• ° 7-f > < .v° rs 4 i t K - }rt •t r(- f -`1 r ... :• a�y'.Ty!G a se;4£ w+. .:t i ) X"t��a lw v�Sa- Z..{.., �t �a Yr. >f�,e b. 2tr1•s -^n't�' 3iY ice, v,.}m+K' F.•Goa-d wf.,'°+:> '2�ri1+*�`l.ya ''S `.'a.k •;,�. sT+ ,C. tiir'u�4 W S.l. >¢ !F at 3 c kw5• �it 41r.�y� "'FF.`!' '. >'a'it+Y i•�+. it" .'F`�T�Ti. L' ''y r •yfar•.� s{.y, c�a nar � s i •..s-�w.��ra -..�.s'l�d'x�`4*t15.�,., °•L ? 'f.�t''''S•�F z JF. '�y y: 'M 'f� -+1 s '!i l--1 P 1 \ at.�°'k��' s.id�+y Y'�s +.1'rtr�' ( � +.>''. rk'.�y.g-. t�,..�•�" '3'4t 43� .r+, ill- ?K rw r ��ik^,f `L�i.1'.�,.. Lit,��>•r r .l.""r5"yyb.��'Si'.K ��` x p �P- ♦ r 1w��e��"'r..a"�4 � �p'lrSNr�-a^�"'''.ga5.n.�cr�, >'+Y't'f'>•-iL�.s!t. t °wr -1"`4s tv� .y.�J...'�..i"•'y�� x .i.�'�i h°`s t ,p rlr,� Si.v+S`.,�.e• cr`tnr :Yr 'a 'ai rfi tt.$.t1S ' ,��a� v 3.q ,-. 4+ f..y, �a a+ .:.r t x•... . e•4�'4 J � �SY'�"4 � �.`r��y £ts4-u• K-t � 'f✓ �' (q+'�G4�.fr. 1'S V �` �++y } �A�i s�4a`f-F�M9ax£[�'Y r��z;.'"°T-t+y T�+•.tL�'WM,aL�ii4 9>.�`-,i,-".--c"`xa'ri'µG�''>}.,•w`'`�c'4Y:F'i�,,p,`5 i' r.'"T-rh.yFi��rr".'2T}n�.ai�rV,�.,1Si.+"'�-�.n'Lr;�. �..t y S,l c p�aF,�T f`��a�-i.^!'3..�:`y X�;Y-�s i�',�R'ys.�..,L-Ji"��aY„�.l WIN "0" "' LV �>`a`aa,•' `...CJ. i'mss t "$,t ,�"�'fiw aa�"F� �S ��x t '� ,tg5f` .(4i a3L•V mow.'T 'ta'v�".c +t ..e�1'.�N�'.^'�"Y- �n•� �a�`"4w� r-`x Y.. �� r'r. Y'' ate. �<?`-y4� .rer �°"'*kL`���5 �,(a -....•.L�'4':, �j., r-�r- 'J"sa'Sl€� ��� at�L�. ,��-„r-TazY,a� - p%�M�t'�'�'4.`�+�,ws-.2-�_��iYF2-��k�`^1' 4�r �_e:•'' '�"'S. 'a� r. WARNER MAROD WM HEART BAR RANDS.ARROWHEAD SPRINGS SM OFFICE BOX 21A6 LM sAN eERNARDB+o,CALIfONN1A 9:1-6 p14I891-1547 February 15, 1993 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street �,, �y LL��y j �3s San Bernardino, California 92418 RE: Sterling Avenue North of Foothill Drive, Agenda Item 32, February 15, 1993: Accepted,Dedicated, Bonded,Final Engineering Plans Approved for Construction by the City, Recorded 1/22/86 Official Record No. 86-017624 with Certified EIR and Addendum. (Sterling Avenue Primary and Bonita Vista Drive Secondary Access) Dear Mayor and Common Council: I write this letter and submit same to the City Clerk for clarification and for the Official City Record. On January 19, 1993 I wrote a letter to Richard Kimble, Editorial Page Editor, The Sun, regarding his January 15, 1993 Editorial Titled "Squabble over Trees not, pretty sight". Without my knowledge or request, Brief Excerpts from my comprehensive letter to Mr. Kimble were then extracted and placed in the Sun, Voice of the People, on January 25, 1993 under the Title: "Street Extension" The excerpts printed by the Sun are true, but without full context. (See attached Editorial dated January 15, 1993"The Sun") (See Attached Voice of the People letter excerpts dated January 25, 1993"111e Sun") On January 27, 1993 "The Sun carried a Voice of the People article titled "Tree Controversy' and letter by Mayor Holcomb. I did not request Mr. Holcomb to write this letter nor it's reference to trees in Sterling Avenue, a Public Street. My sons or I did not request the City establishment of an Assessment District for the construction of Sterling Avenue approved by the City 1/22/86 referenced above. However, my sons voluntarily committed to consider paying one third of the cost thereof, even though the City held an effective Improvement Bond for ifs total development including curb, gutter, pavement, street lights, water, fire plugs, sewer and landscaping mitigation, leading to their property. As Dedicated Sterling Avenue equally fronts another private property owner (Sterling Heights) on the West (50 acres), and fallow City/Water property on the east (151 acres) for 2800 feet, therefore, both their access and property values are enhanced. (See attached Voice of the People dated January 27, 1993) We give our thanks to Dennis A. Barlow, Senior Assistant City Attorney, for writing his January 29, 1993 legal Opinion to the Voice of the People and printed February 12, 1993 under the title "Sterling Project". Mr. Barlow notes the above referenced VOP articles and Opines the following, to initiate a street vacation: "there is HERUAGE OF)31E MOUNtA MD VAl2EY BEGAN m 19so (� OHEADQUARTERS:ro OFFICE BOX 21".ARROWHEAD SPRE .SAN BERNA M,CAI3FORNIA 921-6 (�) RESIDENCE Wn.MG:3295 BROADMOOR ROUEEVARD.S.SN BERNA WO,CAIdORNIA 92M.(714)883 4153 AVARNEAP.HOIX N FAM M. AN9 n Page 2 • an aj?plication to be filed and a fee to be paid by the affected property owners wanting, to vacate the street Such vacation is then reviewed by the designated City Department for notion by the Mayor and Council'. (See attached Voice of the People dated February 12, 1993 RE:Dennis A.Barlow,Legal Opinion) Therefore, the Planning Commission approved no action on November 7, 1990 vacating Dedicated Sterling Avenue as part of the Sterling Heights Tentative Tract process and thus taking away this access fronting the contiguous City property for 2,800 feet, leading to my sons property to the Northeast and acting as secondary access for the existing homes to the west. At the October 23, 1990 and November 7, 1990 Planning Commission meetings Henry Empeno, Deputy City Attorney sat as advisor to the Planning Staff and Commission as to Sterling Heights Tentative Tract No. 14112. He now contends some Cock and Bull story that 2800 foot long Dedicated Sterling Avenue was vacated at that time, because of 15 charred and burned Sycamore sprouts remaining in the right-of-way from a Wildfire on July 1, 1989. Following extensive Geological Exploration by others, along Dedicated Sterling Avenue in June 1992 and for a new 6 Million gallon reservoir and main extension for the East Valley Water District, I cleaned up portions of the area along the Dedicated Sterling Avenue existing dirt access road and removed six damaged Sycamore sprouts therein. For this I am singled out by Mr. Empeno in the cause of an action and allegations filed Friday, February 5, 1993 by Fish and Game. My crime being that I brought to the attention of the City Water Department and the City that they were being hood-winked out of the valuable primary Dedicated Sterling Avenue access to their property previously approved. The November 7, 1990 scheme to cheat the City and Water Department, including other property owners of their Public Safety access, was almost slipped through at that time,pulling the wool over the Planning Commissions eyes. This was being accomplished by the oldest of tricks, not seeing the forest through the trees and the most treacherous deceit of all "Dishonesty by Omission". The Planning staff and director representing the public and commission on November 7, 1990 are no longer with the City. There was no documentation, oral testimony or minutes as to any vacating of Sterling Avenue. On December 9, 1992 Al Boughey, Director of Planning, recommended retaining Tom Dodson & Associate as an expert consultant to prepare a Report on the Sterling Heights and Dedicated Sterling Avenue matters for the February 11, 1993 Environmental Review Committee meeting. Retaining Mr. Dodson was supported at the December 9, 1992 meeting by Sterling Heights, Secret Hollow Ranch, Mr. Penman and City Engineering Department. On January 11, 1993 the Council continued discussion to consider the establishment of an Improvement District until February 15, 1993, Agenda Item 32. On February 11, 1993 Mr. Empeno, legal advisor to the DRC/ERC committee for over two years, advised the committee that their meeting was invalid because the 9 AM time was not carried on their normally posted Final Agenda. According to staff, none of the Final Agendas for the past two years have carried the time, and also while Mr. MRRAGE OF THE MOUNTAINS AND VALLEY BEGAN tN ISSO OMADQUARTERS 9 T OFFICE SOX 21A .ARROmlffAD VR GS.SAN BERNA WO.CASSFORNIA 92A RESIDENCE HARING:1295 BROADMOOR BOU VARD,SAN BEM..O.CARFORNIA"..OI V SULi55 A i/.IMRi MWGWN rAURY GIION AfRIATL Page 3 Empeno has concurrently advised the committee. Never-the-less Mr. Empeno went on to inform the Committee that the Brown Act does have provisions that provides for possible criminal penalties and misdemeanor charges that can be filed against members of a legislative body or advisory committee that meets in violation of State Law or the Brown Act requirements. Therefore, all committee actions would be invalid because of no 9 AM time. (See attached February 11, 1993 ERC/DRC Final Agenda and Planning Recommendation) Mr. Empeno's advice to the committee was to continue the meeting to the next regular meeting on Thursday, February 18, 1993. This of course forestalled the attending committee members and City Support Staff, of twelve persons, from receiving and hearing Mr. Dodson's January 22, 1993 Final Report and making their determination. Planning Staff recommendation was a Supplemental EIR to Sterling Heights with Dedicated Sterling Avenue. The Draft Supplemental EIR was prepared for planning Monday, February 8, 1993. In turn, this continuance of the meeting also forestalled DRC/ERC determination until after the Council meeting of February 15, 1993 and related Agenda item 32. Mr. Empeno did not care for the Planning Recommendation and January 22, 1993 back-up Final Report facts in the DRC/ERC February 11, 1993 Final Agenda. (See attached February 15, 1993 Agenda Item 32,page 13) (See attached Tom Dodson&Associates January 22, 1993 Final Report: Sterling Heights) The following excerpts applicable thereto are found in the January 22, 1993 Final Report by Tom Dodson & Associates: 1. Under Background paragraph 4 pa2e 5 of the Final Report" Tom Dodson & Associates spent considerable time reviewing the 1990 EIR, all conditions of approval associated with the tract, and the minutes of the two hearings held on TT 14112. There was no discussion of vacating Dedicated Sterling Avenue in any of the documents or minutes Qf the hearine. 2. Under Background paragraph S pane 5 of the Final Report "Dedicated Sterling Avenue has never been vacated and is therefore still in force and effect.,, 3. Under Issues and Analysis paragraph 2 pie 6 of the Final Report, "it is clarified that no additional decision need be made by the City regarding Dedicated Sterling Avenue; it exists and has not been vacated to date." 4. Under Background. a�ragraph ). Rage 6 of the Final Report. "When the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 14112 it did not make the necessary findings regarding reversion to acreage. Specifically, 66499.15 and 66499.16 of the Subdivision Map Act (see attachment 6) require the following: "A public hearing shall be held on the proposed reversion to acreage. Notice thereof shall be given in tine time and manner provided in section 66451.3„ and "Subdivided property may be reverted to acreage only if the legislative body finds that: (a) Dedications or offers of dedication to be vacated or abandoned by the reversion to acreage area unnecessary for present HERITAGE Of THE MOUNT S AND VALLEY BEGAN W 1150 OHEADQUARTERS:9 T OFFICE SOX 2146.ARRO6'l1EAD SR CS,SAN BERNA WO,G OWA 92106 W RESIDENCE MAILINGS 1295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDDIO,CAIIFO 924 .1111111,1,1 A (OD 1-LRON ARIlIAR Page 4 or prospective public purposes. Neither proper notification or findings made y the City could be found" As you know, Mr. Empeno was also responsible for handling the Stubblefield legal Action pertaining to the prior City planning process in Mountain Shadows. On April 1991 the Jury awarded $11.5 Million in Damages against the City. Hundreds of thousands of dollars in Tax payers money was and is being spent on appeal of this case. The city Attorney has now hired outside legal Counsel to represent the City. Ironically. in the City February 15. 1993 supplemental Agenda Item S-1 the City Attorney asked for $200 thousand from the City General Reserve to 12ay litigation-outside Attomey. (See attached February 15, 1993 Supplemental Agenda Item S-1 RE:City Attorney$200,100) RSAC continues to support at this time the City's establishment of an Improvement Funding Structure for Dedicated Sterling Avenue Primary and Bonita Vista Drive Secondary Access. This provides emergency secondary and other access for the existing homes to the west, Sterling Heights, Secret Hollow Ranch, City/EDA Water Department Property and EVWD Reservoir Site. No City Public Funds will be required, and the cost thereof will be passed through with the disposition of their Little Sand Canyon Project. In either event the access increases the City/EDA/Water property value many times over. RSAC does believe, in perspective to the past City experience for planning process litigation, that constructive progress should also be considered. Respectfully, Warner n,� Shauna Clark,City Administrator At Boughey,Director of Planning and Building Services James Penman,City Attorney HERITAGE OF THE MOUNTA S AND VALLEY BEGAN W 1150 (}7 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE RO%1106.ARROTI6..RD SPRDIGS,SAN EERNA Wl.CA2l,O 91006 (�� RESIDENCE MAnING-3295 RROADMOOR ROULEVARD.SAN BERNARDDIO.C ORNLA tl9N (7141 903-0153 A iAIKI f.MO .. IAMR�C110N AfiW - r i T Y`7{ Lj(, •W c a'<r• - 4yY.t. tats" L c Itf*dJ A F SYt L s1 J flf-L ,{('�.• ,;. •rt"S +�* +r.w ..// r,.tt�S•i 5r; 't`�t� •� f',a., d ^aIY 3" +^(f5 x ~ F a.-r .+^' ...¢E,• rM1�M §a^v .1 r .JI„ • r'ts 'M` % °;S"T Ram �> �'!f'g- 1y, + '✓ ' '+'i r9rr_,,Lt xt y r,avr'v .xeq.. y4`.e`4 ^ t �4 '� .s u' }..S.,r+ •r•,.x,} '�tA,K 4�-- .r a+.r •,Iz 21 # za r. �� �,9' .!"j zY o 2`x..4 „3'�. T, 'X .7�+ °'*Ate w 3v7 G'?i 3 .nyw.cxt ....s-.=`zF ZIS '�¢ "` rc 1.{rte yr� "STS >�,( lJ aCJ �.'� t� ,, 53�t�L�s p,.,.k �Ell Oi`l milli r ���� t�ir � � ,,,'' .e � ����'k `U'dBF.,a$ '�a5 s ��ss��,,,, ?3: -.�. .+t OMAN'•r4}`+A' 'y °r it ?'�"' + ct ...>� a3s", ^, v �5t �x+r.j, h.AFsar" s��sa,(n�YS ,�t,�� fu.R r• '�.. e�r�3� < 2�t tt�'.,s'��,���`ate . �C r Ta„T">l' -a1�'o^'tS' +."tlr 'g3,k' . g iFi'sr �r srt t xE`' -T u i• SSAI t tub � tJ^ a 1w`�i`R}+ � 4. 43 5Y.y5S.e�� � � 13^s,.-irr-y wb4� -+ -r t 1.`y��f� .G. 4 ? r ii.SY 5�.4��3��t.��,.�yyy"� G�ka .• h .ri]+�ry 'C'.�iL wx !ti{"4J� t rf1�.1{ a' Ei{}ti� L �Tk'$�l. i`,✓A��+��.L4y�-.{+ kfi '!�Y•`i9a"tSS r�'.'Y+ ��i/'�"}{...�fi� ' '{�j� �?�rr�N-�.. ��SW�1 t�'��''a�hM. �e4 ^ } 1* Z "s.Vr`Otis `:;,�r,,,fk` wg'y'�`#S�rlt.,^r�id jx •`J�,t h,: It**�r a"'r4 ia<yh�.r.+rr Y 5 r rt�1..+C.`/.i a'y>F�i�.tS r',✓-k a f t`t a`''�I3Sy?Y J,�r"^»S�'e x,e';4�/''rs`rrY'';7�?•..t_'t lAtr;i�ft;+,s�Y1�r A4Fi a'-v.r.Ca.`i s,�a4?.'4d rra Er�d u3 ys e7',�rsS 7�t 5d,2'.��1A:°�-.y+t•¢a4.rt'�zr.,ty],�T L'�{`rr t��xr° 't".rnY�'-'jr5€'e,�$xY`',r' i}*SV'`f.+�^"^sr x xa�.t`2`rs 3 e<•GE k` ^ f� i- +yam " , '. d�� r•.i ?y">r+�r�a: 75, rvr Jw rilyl b ± t �.( 'Q• » d��ttC r Z..94Y�' ri T Milt '3,V,,J�'lf}x Ia�y t NV•y t 1 h vP J Y-�'fl'a • 4-1( i f-yS x} F• atiK' 4 ' 1 5 > •t y Y y. t k. < r r r. ° u.F st`S 7i. �,�.5 "�`r •�3rry o4i...--`x'�+ 3 >...F r<-z t �; �`ia i '1' 't.>.lsw r' t.-A•�'rrsrt->,`.tr'+r3 s "*nr tw - i K>a"Yt¢Sr r'•'e; ra-' s 1 . A .YS>r-', ...vaX•r Y s AT y .2 {.Y q{' ♦ J�1 t i. 4 n,syti .s'j✓y+, io ` .+ fi tCrr f -!Ms t p4ti ry it7"r +rMy4ifw7vfi f 4s P •a -t¢�'ti`$' r a 1t" ,w Jr {gEE w-T r AY s'!U ) ♦ 2 £ "T t Fi5 eai}>.R 4" i ayriT� e.. a'S?Tf.+34.fy sr.� iT'�r.�'.'b�t',G;n+•'�E h�if�^J�y"�.'t�s'ypk�S x .�..�,�'£ +"' '�^^* 3 2 .ry� .�.ttT '>•e:i.]h,Z f`"' �Y PL, ^S;Y,..i .fit 't`?r�f <,5•rrT. pT S�k�ra r',.tirvPK'r<tx•.�4 .i tr"'i'T.y)',,�°r a{rry+, '-'C; .'it Ft'clvirl rk ' t.�..> S-05 ! c ��� t�,4'�cr.} ,; s� `ai 4J��.?1 , +.tt's4 '?!• i•-Fr' > "Wit+Si rs o tS.. �, r'�wtx S`Ky`t3 a " 'w.S'te'�j, ♦ r'k}.,>+--nt ;fy. 5t r'rfu+� fi^ 2..+e r»�'`dt, ats `rTinii' *3.. \`z^'+z.3a...'9c •-+ '#,iT1ir•'fi',a��CF"t�X+ .yen ti yr •` �} ✓t(JL >�.'U���`2� r <F,z1'`"i��x�' } K��<. Yry �--ra s° 'y.r"< L "�N •Ti�� t9 2Z�iUc 2 r �y�E- Y'L' 'us - fit' �-cish •�; .s".r ,�}�ayrFSai "'r--M`A.a{.+{j•T P Y v"R r 'i. �.'?',�'+."r}�r' a rT r>i yf .s ti r Y^ S 'arr J1,5wA tSf'Lj<1 .t's 3€.Ctkr„ i 1` \'< r 'nK°uzix'r ' tr E��}- .x Fi '°S'f1tS.t.T 6 2 0 " 4 � .� } '" .�: 5Y y•}r�Xr -i o3 pi C e�J yrJ'va !�Y•LyZ.'+:R'ar s r h J.rr?,n.".]yr•+"..-.-''+Cb••ct`iitr�j r}i•°-r,rtra;X•.r.i iwt�'.:.y y'.a t<�l�c JEK.j 4�sr 4d y Ci"t iFa-rxc+i3„wSZ.'x.9a'r`•T e'A�-)�°o4.g'�'s rY7a,+,T f.C•yy".'t3{At�'K{+aXack.;,,^+}Qs E f ia a.i C-.y e r-c.�b r t'"-r^iaa ftia"r t S r fi^Ltr sr`">n*Lss s t-r4.Y'`^.yr i�sn S w c l4 tG43t+fx'„r�w>.3'<„w,Y.�,bfi'rT4 iw%'�S><�,S,�Zici'yi.F e}sS?r.�y`.�rjWt`�x`"Y ts2A'- .Arr1R•�F.Y*air q+ T•r i7 rj x ^j ij Mi1 4' >< yt a4f f t ts.et`g ai.r . 'Sj � rz, r in �t.".g .�. ..s - S W }ry s"s'� y3. s ast 4 .. '`-; yr{�. �r ,vy @,yr�'''yi�icx� �".ak�� � �°�.T x��� t,p" '9W'��'�'F{�Yr,'ia•.Rti- �!'�f �a°3 ���M4�r!t> •w t- s t . l,> z 3 v�r5 J "tE' �s �'F7 n°1 ` iir ,+ "+st�cd a iNY''.'•'•ta r�r �':r er ts. 41y „t. ♦.:}+� h jY�{S-y7 -kii r,y�,.� 4x+.�.YI:1`..-lV •`C. ..y� .t y. ,y! <` rk' .+ < 15�..vM .C` 7'^ i"Y ^t• z *T'i„y s a +tr..wal n?af rs' f Z +d�•i `Y`C4f•"3�' S. }"}i�z� + y2''w5µ'M ..Jx+7t+ r•� Sh' a✓a aY •t -.. i, c.r u '�,�'r vim, "µ. 3 ` 3r A'f.'r.' • J.r�(�a % <. r +�'rL tsar rt/`.�- 1 4'" 'r� . i it T Zn>lxy. ♦ '"sy'W�Myi�"y '.�.a.LS,«.5 sS'. C to 4 .resiNit 4R<��.5'�'-.- t. . �.°F r*{, `'4� .ta•';CVyJ't>y�yF .. > t y, 'Z , r%e2' " c Y 1' '"� a'D a x,yi✓t r x rte xy,x.L„,y S. ? t itv ?°'e''l�c. ..s S r, ly r'r'ih r w!F�.,q.{� C tat =` > t✓;M.x ,w v� r 2`>t(¢l`9 t7 ac7�4y.w'' .t -G• -x.'`C^r' St " a +c 'y n .3 'a n .[a:F'w, ./e g-� r} '. .,, N` � l a}s ik:'1�•} a•JaY,ra 1{» tX t^yk^^i s�.Jr'iZavh 2ur{s Yt {,��'1"ri isW,C"^a, �' t ••},"".tr„ s " sa:- 3 A J'(' z` x i Fx'cr..✓ur-. >*Tit> it,. t .>:•,G...rn.;,s� u St' as 2��.i. t Syar'K'alajta t� -�`'.,S rr r+ •.°3< }"t SJ gyp£ t 1EJ 5d;4 tw4.0.'mti 'GC .M1r °w yr 9l hn�s`1.4 t r i ^'• r* t` +r t i-1r 9 rtt, a. v tLr ia. 'sy .c 3�. t 3 r �1-,tyA t^ L ��S.a^a''e`er,' '� ��25 "`•--•h'-•s". .: T i 'rt�3`'�k,'h5'�.] �.a yn,k1 tP. s -iy,^. �x -...e•tz' fc 'F'tl, aa.Y7r�.�'�'� , a*f" s t. e n t Csrt t z R t<+ ~atey5.�i of 2 J 9i'it xt �.....yr+� + fi. 1.Y3' F..tir MY' s a. to }..v'aat .,..r- �...i .i A s >r a •' ^n-TC'L v .r s rw 42. J u+ .•e •t ° Ibr li .•l r'Y .. .�„ Q art e t pf r J z+•fijyvaS' aL v 7 4`. Mlr 4 L.r t a 2} M' S^r r t{ t i} r pi k`s s.t n'O'3'ya $i f,.!l "-fist :Y'i`I` x £s. /�4s:>.s. t. -t�yw` S°' t a5 t' �'.. N r'.rr 7'..Gr'f T'^-s "E' i1,+'`i 7 P > },`.C`hS'S"A.�-<+i✓ 7JP L^ r Yv a'�.}'jS wi K.-'�M "ts.v .`x�.ieT'i-`ia` iPtJJ.a1nn�..2`-i-Y-rr•(�N``s;.�!'ra},y rac'S�S""4}.rc yu� Jx''p^ 4`! R y. ¢t2 r _♦ y F-> .�L 3, .a�ti Y Sr- -G y i t v r- R 'z{�••'er'Sa Y '. Y 4 _ � \ < b+ rtv � � 4J 2'. E} - .r L-"t✓1"`� r .R� r ; r'S>3'tY S"G�y)t .,ark 1 tt a 4 •{L�•l n. t�l -l. ,�>iF�Q 1 TP; 5 N..l� ro �S'+� t�`j ��.�Y.�. ss`r r x i nS ik s'Y At r '', fr s Y ty. ywi r4 srNY f �YFY ant P aY ti t ¢T Y + y} �-'+t-•'-i? ? ,. ay 'K 't' "ley, ',f yt i 1 rr't ;SfPyF rY A �j.,y ar'xr�'' <Ya�,r, ¢ yre i3 Cyt Gf •K >'r ,+ 'at '. rA^l Air .q ss V" - ♦ , '+ie vr,4.. s"( q, E r .J y ai. £Ye+^''-let 2h Y>,...•�' xb 4ti}��.4 a�iilR "��. rR- ;.jt Y a`54'S.,-;Yt!`e'"' t %'his Xr"sY ,.'c-"'+,S w tt s7 .*fit k• S > .r ro .`G.'-�' w.{ �Y rss+ r s�f e.....�� Fh rz v}t F li,�t':ae`'!tr Zkrr`r.•..b Zt.s-..l k y r•':c,t 4:`•i1*�tYF r�-..�•'.�it.+�.-s+�y a'>qr.t.'�'„,�`>T"t'�iJi'a-rI-5.if^'i'Y'?_iS-wRy'N.-�r-L as�r l�.k�✓4'rs^Y`x r rttv c`e^.;-f.i. rJ�,,i r�,^.ra r`'n*"�r"•^Lt'w^,.r.:Ir*+5 t.��Jf.3a+L,'<'r"q h"`r,a'yty-^iiY'vp r a�T t r 4's%aM"K7i*^ic^y+s-"'Y�*i'.ir"�+',�t'xr•�.•-.a..i.s.#t>Ft L.N t rst".tt�'.';v r te iat';`t«�,`NuM.1SS-rj`•rsFs-;.x�'ta';�4"y'"rh�}>S>i�y`.w'fr sf4r^ryJ��r.-T"}j.��,i_•1s.a}''f j5 a� «:{e£r5ae�rrr.,g g`3nr'n t.e.t}w^�.":1.rN'Y'o 31i".`p,�Sy y i 3>M1 v'�Y-,-a•xa.rte`a^�'i na�-,ja'„:,I€F`kp y"F,•1t t G"s^S-`-,f i tr'�`a`'a'+r k5y�S?�'"ih A'.c.7 W- 7? OM t C V. K AA S' �rM.P•s z e,f Y.3e»f`J,�,"'kr§S_'let/v.''a^mc'F'+,rs-F2�a h sa�$te_-ta;'}.- t+4o+ ., Ts > v `f°3 w`o'k.. < { z°.C.•'4. y0t��1�sy �' �a����t<• �� ,&„ �'�y,�,,G �`°�n�yse�at^.}Ri .§e�x�ry�Y v.r'�.�' yJx ? Rwyi Nw. a� _ 3 y� stb r'� A. j�y.� a.. � ��"^^`��3a �..rH's3. vrr�C'x.' • J, '� � - - �c''�� Zo /,Y'. J' �Y"�`..e. ���� 'may X i �• � .*" � r. .................. �arji . 6 The Sun Page A9 Friday Editorial Board January 15, 1993 Brooks Johnson,Publisher Arnold H.Carson, Editor Mike Whitehead Richard S.Kimball Managing Fditor Editorial Page Editor Rosemary McClure Loma May C.Sullivan Assistant Mamging Editor/Features Editorial write Gustavo Ortiz Cindy Butner Informauon systens Director - Resurfi Managa Olin Hanisop,Pubrie Member, EDITORIALS Squabble over trees not pretty sight ■ S.B.'s foothill environment IS at risk of being a victim of politics. Developer Warner Hodgdon,the prime Sharp clashes between SanBernardino's .focus of the investigation,maintains that the Mayor Bob Holcomb and City Attorney Jim trees,damaged by fire and other factors, Penmen are not uncommon,but Monday's were a hazard.He has asked the city envi- harsh conflict was notable because it gave ronmental review committee to consider insights into the manner in which the corn- new information about them,which the com- munity's sensitive foothill environment is or -mittee has agreed to do on Feb.11. isn't being protected. At Monday's council meeting,Penman Several developers of planned housing urged that the council delay action on the . 'developments(including,interestingly,the Sterling Avenue extension issue at least un- municipal water department,which owns til that Feb.11 review had occurred.It was a property on the hillside)are pressing for the plausible request,but one that brought ex- estabtishment of an assessment district to plosive opposition from the mayor. help pay for an extension of Sterling Avenue Penman's office also has disagreed with north of Foothill Drive—and Holcomb conclusions offered by City Engineer Roger seems passionately determined to see that Hardgrave,who contends that the environ- happen as soon as possible. mental impact report for the project"can be The sticking point is that the preliminary accomplished by 1111ing an addendum or an plans call for Sterling's extension through an amendment."In a rebuttal memo,Penman's area where some protected California syca- office called Hardgrave's suggestion"a pre- mores were removed without required per- mature conclusion without adequate analy- mitslast June. sis.The city's environmental consultant. . . Back in December 1990,when the city has not completed his research or analysis planning commission approved a housing nor has he consulted with all the affected tract for some of the property west ofSter- public agencies,in pard cular the Cal ifornia ling,it stipulated that the 15 trees should not Department of Fish and Game." be removed.In fact,it decreed that there Holcomb and his sycophantic city engi- should not even be any grading performed neer are hardly stalwarts working to pre- within 50 feet of them.Those stipulations serve the mountainsides'natural features.It were approved by the city's environmbntal should inspire San Bernardino residents to review committee,were not appealed and pay much closer attention to what is being thus became official city policy. traded away in the foothills. Meanwhile,because of the trees'remov- ■ You may write San Bernardino officials at . a],the state attorney general's office has en- 300 N.D St,San Bernardino,CA.92418;phone tered the picture.Writi ng to San Bernardino the mayor's office at 384.5133 or the council officials as recently as two weeks ago,a dep- office at 3845188. uty attorney general confirmed his office"at the request of the California Department of Fish and Game has been actively investigat- ing numerous alleged violations of law aris- ing from grading activity" in that vicinity. • The Sun Page A7 Monday January 25, 1993 • • Street extension JAN.19 Concerning your Jan.l5,edi- tohal,"Squabble over trees not pretty sight,"unfortunately,The Sun and I are being misled by these"premeditated duels" staged with City Attorney Jim Penman and Mayor Bob Hol- comb. Interestingly enough,under the city attorney office's Nov.7, 1990,handling of Sterling Heights'tentative tract map,va- cation proceedings for existing Sterling Avenue were never ini- tiated.The private easement al- ternative advocated requires a 34 percent grade and a 250-foot hill- side cut to provide access to my son's property,the city property and the neighborhood homes to the west Existing Sterling Avenue was accepted,dedicated,bonded,re- corded and approved for con- struction by the city Jan.22,1986, with a certified environmental impact report and addendum The facts are the burned and chaired sycamores within the Sterling Avenue right-0f--way are not a pretty sight We have com- mitted to put in their place more than 100 trees(sycamore,alders, eu(alyptus,pepper),irrigated fire resistant plantspecies,along a 3,800-foot parkway corridor with securi ty monitor entrances. WARNER W.HODGDON San Bernardino The Sun page A7 Wednesday January 27, 1993 Tree controversy JAN.19 City Attorney Jim Penman presents the silly sycamore scandal of 1993. In 1986,after a full environmental impact report,San Bernardino gave fl- ip approval to a housing tract in the foothills.The approval required the developer to post a bond guaranteeing the extension of Sterling Avenue in a new dedicated and recorded right-of- way.Some sycamore trees,badly burned in the Panorama Fire,stood in the center of this approved extension. Last year,unaware that this exten- sion had been approved,the planning commission approved a different Ster- ling Avenue extension.In this action,it forbade removal of the trees,not know- ing they were badly burned. In a general area cleanup,in the ap- proved and bonded rightof-way,a de- veloper who had purchased the prop= erty cut down five of the burnt trees. This has led the city attorney to under- take an expensive investigation. The city attorney is mindlessly wasting money on politically driven in- vestigations.In a recession,he is hold- ing up needed construction work. Let's pass the assessment district and get Sterling Avenue extended. MAYOR W.R,-BOB-HOLCOMB San Bemardino The Sun Page A7 Friday February 12, 1993 Sterling project JAN.29 Warner Hodgdon's recent letter said the city attorney took no steps to vacate the previously authorized ex- tension of Sterling Avenue when the new tentative map wasapproved, im- plying that we had some duty to do so. In the 5% years this city attorney has been in office, we have neveruu- tiated a street vacation,nor should we. There is an application to be filed and a fee to be paid by the affected property owners wanting to vacate the street- Such vacations are then reviewed by the designated city department for ac- tion by the mayor and council.The city attorney's office does not direct this process. Another letter writer said the own- er of the property in question con- ducted general area cleanup,including cutting down some of the trees which the planning commission had required not be removed. Contrary to this con- elusion, the "cleanup" was conducted not by the owner of the property, but by the owner of an adjacent piece of property wanting to enhance both the - access to and value of his property. OEN.NIS A.BARLOW Senior assistant city attorney San Bernardino CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FINAL AGENDA DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Development and Environmental Review Committee (DRC/ERC) is a City staff committee responsible for technical review.of projects. The committee is made up of representatives from Public Works- Engineering, Police, Fire Marshall, Water, Planning and Building Services, Parks and Recreation, and (Economic) Development Departments. Applicants and their representatives should attend the meeting to clarify issues and receive input from City Departments and other reviewing agencies. A DRC/ERC case takes on an average 30 minutes. MEETING DATE: Thursday, February 11, 1993 MEETING LOCATION: Fourth Floor Conference Room A. Consent Cases: B. Regular Cases: PROJECT PLANNER 1. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14112 & CONDITIONAL Qua USE PERMIT NO. 09-67 (Er0VSION OFT ME) GUBMAN Applicant: Melcorp Investments, Inc. owner: Tahiti Group APN: 155-372-01 thru 34, 155-601-01 thru 69, 155-591-01 thru 20 Ward: 4 Proposal: To create a 56-lot single- family residential subdivision on approximately 50.51 acres located north of Foothill Drive, west of the Sterling Avenue extension, in the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation and within the Hillside Management Overlay District. Status: Continued from December 25, 1992 Staff Recommendation: Supplement to Final Environmental Impact Report to address the reestablishment of Sterling Avenue, Revisions to the previously approved tentative map to incorporate the reestablishment of Sterling Avenue & DRC discussion. MOTION: That Municipal Code Section 2.56. 140.E be repealed and that the ordinance repealing Section 2.56.140.B be adopted as an urgency ordinance. STAFF REPORTS CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 1. 1993 31. Discuss and take possible action relative to the relocation of the Social Security Building -- Council Member Hernandez. (Backup material was distributed on February 1, 1993, Item No. 25) MOTION: That the matter relating to the relocation of the Social Security building be tabled. CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 11. 1993 32. Authorization to proceed -- establishment of an assessment district for construction of Sterling Avenue, from Foothill Drive to Daley Canyon Road. (Backup material was distributed December 21, 1992, New Business Item) Ward 4 MOTION: That the City Clerk and City Engineer be directed to proceed with the establishment of an assessment district for construction of Sterling Avenue, from Foothill Drive to Daley Canyon Road. 13 2/15/93 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA FEBRUARY 15, 1993, S-1 Approval of appropriation from General Reserve to City Attorney Budget to fund outside attorney and litigation costs. (See Attached) (Cost to City — $200,000 from General Fund Reserve) NOTION: That the Finance Director be instructed to draw down additional amounts not to exceed $200,000 from the General Fund reserve to fund payment of outside attorney bills from the following City Attorney budget accounts: Litigation-Outside Attorney (001-051-5-3049) and Litigation (001-051- 5-53050) . S-2 Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of Program Supplement No. 77 of Local Agency Federal-Aid Projects, between said City and the State of California, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, relating to the rehabilitation of pavement on Arrowhead Avenue, from Mill Street to Third Street. (See Attached) (Cost to City— $51,042 from Street Construction Fund) Ward 1 NOTION: That said resolution be adopted. 2/15/93 +i• u`�iJ'°P>:r? ,ro r �}:'T :t ..^fi rvl4+�) l,""' �ry Jsy^r>' 1'N'?d' r< wF v £Tye V[T^' '�, a^ �`f•+rrit._y'v..� "•:;r r ar,c 2„vf[S��-"�5 *'d 4�s'�'? a�VI'M',n.Yswt9 to.4Y-5 T ME ' d t >*Iw+ Xw] 1 t xrS � i 1 TCviT�'�`ef' 'y�iYx{ .{ay, e ; C ."iy �1�AJLr ' �.f1,�� �w a�� r�•'}.y ii°' �Se`. -✓•city,,•` ai .x�'CeT•a: ^* „M t��ft�-�,,�eJ>ar.• s� �^•�Y l.>sr'3' z 4r'w>J'x ,� .: `+�;' r�• �"C��.� dy •sr` ''�y""�,. r *mrscs.'�a. C" ,,r .tu� -�'si, *•"• •` r+c�.sr`x;q �Y,�s f !fy. >� fTrs?• 'Ri S k..u� > • ' �!.� t T"r �w'�it ..s••v y' K'.°rrr c.4- r'4./ ,3 ? # s `c" '•�1'S1� MA fill rr.�TL3 rl:3 a6Y. R`�^Y aMyit•�t,- i at''sF.'� .t§• TvtfrJ"-" � `. 'A'w''�'R erxn�?°[i �k-s3¥"�-? �. ..gacc'.r"r "�? rAiiSa j`Cf"�'tt`+1r^nj b>`.}f-r "`w ��z'.� r°�3'�r�:i ��S`�•cs,Y_��T� t 'w..a � �'���y � � "�.� ��r'`�" alSna.�C.T• a '{ , r .. tiy u.�s'"�y�k*j0t�`4, tr'•,•y=r+tYi%�.,d'T 4J '�}a'P •ts -. '�F zti��+G > •:G+ y�<x `_srt�. ,.n�'F",#` ti"'..„. v i . mac. ^' v't rastl � W"t'f.`t!•l S<!"l '4 `.F-d T'a, r �n Yv� r'1w•'91 yam«.. b3' .`•{y�� •s iK.�•yt.�1C,.><, t�C`nrsa ` 'M erg. '�� 4 X 's4`� t }' rl•K'ra >r•?,,.PT-t'y '° "'.�°.ts 1+:f ^,}��'LGs "''Maw i i i til vst ]i j• ..I a r. >?.?ir "EST's•} i.°°'." yx''i•wit 'v2 a.5 4 `„4.'r. .y b� •y x1s tea..�t ;y- rj e Lf Vyi 5 t <1^ fy'-n JSrrar cat- `hc 44^�f`SS"VT 3t fy�cx�Ti @L kh a�'J4 iy W s•(H at +..y; r k4'ft t ~r•T /. 1^x a�Ri7i7r 3 - » v{ zi. d'a st .i T �K*.'Sr, eJ✓^'y,`. YO (�„'Y L ,yri 5..y 43.^s5+'>�Yl+":.a4 gff ' y s�� ij .r.-, -2;5 Zc,}'r•4 4>ti" �.i 4`�` STSr't`k'f�[.w`�'t'SY sY` .�'.LyY�.-•.,r' +a' W 1` y��<,,.•*•. .•t,a�+(s�y{'�'sMf'}>/�-rktt .a�41��rv`=3'H%3':4x ,� -.xt .v 'a t r S I "'Se_�}t.x }l;r:t}.�•3 iy�ttyS�s:�.Yts`.,S S�Y+�S.rr, s a. �•�yy,'F•"i K 2 f e c r K r'.f.R v c r 3•"y Y L.,F A`6t+'•+„Y+'-iT•>'`Si-35`}ii�i 2eat^d.4.2>rbyq.;T,'F f�°4�i%.r1•sK h✓r}[a>JZ.w Y t,.�-}C -f•'4I'! 'Ta e l J +y:a. ' 'i G.s,:�•C h-t\1+n�G•xrs.i"''Y�y j`14 i,�°gj"�jr&S"''1v 3t p.,+�.i't r S<.£l!+]«,?y+ew,i z s R..[<'��'�^`Y u";°�5 �.rq.r.1 1.i � r.,..,,.5^yd.•»�P2v'y,� ...,fy�K�t�� '!j'.1 ! tv4'�is ><e �?�s,..�?•�;}��a�a JZ 5��✓ FF/ .s� s t j'a o- s. ..x� �.;.T r-,.K ,x / �� FiiiT 3Y'f$Y< � ��,ta `•=rCril }� #,,. +bfi'`'H �Iakn€ �inCZL'r�✓f' . 1 ( S T S •a' a t Lr T yT _ r ^" '`ia G ♦��� "_'k-` �i ITS 'i'a`• 1S o f � t' Y> ? "v' iT � '� i M T tNt� fe�r.�?�,�jiy t"}�r Y . •r`'' L'Ft`T2S' Hw +t�..r .aiYi -r`c 1 1 ,i. 4 Ye yr 5r �,SCrJ" e.` yS Y.v (>#?"a3 y`ni•+�'.i y-..'si- fy'r r _ S' IS.kr,3yF. /+.y'KV yp�4 t L •�( 5'4 f!^t`r hR 4 S. N � .I.T �, ix.+• _4 G �. ���f� rvrl; vt r, .Y S/ '\ 1x .i�'•t�C'tYiY�S-1l^'+. "i+ 7-•s u' ..'r+9�cr'a n}fr'�.C:� SY'�ty[ •4 S`�' if2� ;ti�+n r;U {ySr^�4 r� .f.,G T 'krd'3ti3 S'ib" 5�,'+` ,5`•`+1 :� �' #T�.if+ w?4. K. 'i rC 1 S! �r a�ii v31 ` 'r 'it -K�^w16'2a.q'3rs, tlk'..� r �!'A"(i1s'sS' s"a �Y S 5 • .ir>x7T}jt 'f f' v-s Alfa ti 4 a t.,• 'Y iii rS/.t ys rtr tt',}ts`r'+ ?y.«•+v r ,� ;�4� f';1 ;+ �i, 1`I Z rT?) s � r .•,,KS �nW J e # �t .f, } ktgs„f`,t`\'ei.k�t'3".'E..J• '+SFsierY�3Y kS'H-§:+� :r+•;F:+ik` s.'�'�'s`,.Si,,5 G'f^�i/7^ 4?- . r�syrs. it T• 'a4v.2 x g �,� .y.4Mt�`` h�" r'� if4'e,° Y'<s •f r "3y+ka�' �s, 7'"i j3�ti`�? .%1v�4fq-;yt �rs�.�r¢�^i",r y.`s +1 t, w"&'Ye N+,ys '�„�d�a.t a s s t <•, t/ J t"* 1"PE A -s'( 'S.b'y. `F'."!itk2n. t >?' n i> ,> „Y..S.:r N3`,�Cs+ay ✓..:ri ,�./+13l` PG %4.KC> lr a,.ar T�yG,s��yv -�S•S t� ^`?L4's..{.- y� ya ..f: .S3�a� .s' >r.s "�'«,S," F , ,a v I x '2 + fr:�44sx•7 S.y.'Y : 'FS 99 ! ^ny. } [9�s z,•�a .«Nfet F v'Yr ai[i5'!'.*.'+C Asa. a a tt" r - n i Stt J �}t � a a•Z;Y ciJ'ri3t' -✓ v v Lr 6 i^ a#t ! v .krif 't`n<.iW,'tF�°�,�ls. .aY?r i'' A. L •,,,,w/Sa�>•,' t4 ``�i„�tt�rrri�? y tiit� s rTn/�,S xS s� r,;�,f -�a-, a. '^�,5.�* ;.[.�syn,�. Ccj< .s T�y� }.«}..�i-•e�rtia�z. t• � -4\ r 2t'H•a Y tt tT ' .`F`.""T a"+"? ,y,, i i a 'XI R Is } ?p�,�r ? _r K.anayy slr-us°`y�`T F.f< ! aizw RR 1 )fi+•�'T' "�`Cr• '4s'rtn;�' �mStR' s;p' . ,r� 1•_>n`,si s 1 J 4 . rTf{ / t '` t. `�S "Rrt l �?yr• wt�S( .Y r�•y! I"F t ;ty +^ ". rsc[°3.w n• ` sa ti'W•3•�'§s. mg,E >n S 1 •aLn' ^74Ns4r rFit r"z'A"R r� lt '4'y Q-9.-'Jl+ i.u' ! yr-/r.,,'T� • f i' v 1 " m +.. K Q s F✓i. n. r1t s S !S .T.r't�r au' Y`t er �,2. Y.,IS>rhx iv. •4. < 1> NZ } y} k `G. fi+.S" -•.s. 'D` y yY: i.,Rf .r Jt f -S.y Y Cr 1S'L k f r }s ' !'1.s 'a.r{y p..n'r'.� 'F .rvl. r SY Y a 's'f y ih-t a�-t�LL}iau yr�.py�.yZy:Y}} z:SX.ki3`f fad>s {M1x+y�S. �` +yp'�T•'ted'� a`-n .:Xr4b'ir�� "� nyx w h 4 ^? tf •C`it}'Y`ltS y .4 Y)) w5•.t L( w. kl .!� it .i'- Yi 'l+.'f, ri. t ' a s •-y-i aT # ♦ vV� Y .S .rr N w'•x;Y i Jf« 1.1 rt -•� .lr + ♦ s-i Mir x '" Y- Y �- .a:'tw vt '�3.y,.ya,s r � ✓+.a s FxY»xi �,s � ;ts'Te TaY" r 6�. 1 ks t :r w >, ysr �x•� ° Z a�,,,Yn 7 „sr'ai trtaf) r ri fy}.yP�.y Lrb }Y�e�ya3' j s.."`f -nYiw�k r'gr{h'Cf 4i YFTfz =fir .`Ir � „9Yi-r xd S£'y>,jj `mss tE .y,IF > a.ry � ,n 5., M`? t 23• n 'Ttr � -� 4 M L•"s; L y tM r Yf�"•J44 R f. c}. `.' * 'F'Y-Ytn<4 T P "'.yi r<s � C li t ,t. ;r r ~u'fix '-.'� , 4 •i. h� a i"aa �}z [... a y •`'S saa sY •Yta'f F2�Y % Y t-r 'ur. r.>r zr'A'f rfv- #.� i t .s'r�Lf'4j t'. � s •f+> 2.J, ,Yy4']'+r. ;, '� �^ki. ��v'n,,v�r lr^r k aY•F1.'YS� rr '� '4L ,'°'.r��.D' I..r+..,zr�L. <y'"' .s4�.� � .• �Y'n?L�r ay,s u^r Yc •t },3. �tjye .f°Y,x„>vr.a '°`�sar �' �3.p�' r�'�3.:. .IF.Y-k. �"°'•+.+t S +r•. A�r:.�.r";�i s�a'X� a r?°'t�,{,r"L T*:4,� jj j �"�"" sC`'�-, c 45. Xzrw#4t„ a'36'Fin�. s.> .c+.+ irSJ Y ' 'k £r 'r xY- iL«t.' Y..^4" tY.X``��•4�a> } ,,, i _ Si 43 -} Ty ✓ -'3tR �t`�� e� i3.Sti F•�w.,.�i i.s$F;ti a's..�.�"`y.�•�rY`i�yt x�'^` ,t c r 'C`r%J�•�way�°J$2 rst"C.aC'c '•." �•°2at'!w�a��•y " r4 ritis t r rI � r� f en r ? ✓.r t? ,1�� R5? ?stv •k� tly tx r s r h >•`i e`r+''.ry,S•,.(7y r e��5� ]e.sk. !� .y.. 4r ry g > t < f 8 r 2 {st t dK ?• 4 ^`f by .lf�t. r. zl Yy a .+.1"}- l i"1^ y ,t zs' iy°? �^z�T2.1�"''•. M �.S 5.. y yt. � .� ._ r �. 'f'}". t.'.s?"'$• F ;. r _ i si4 .Tz r x''r-,'t z+F. = S`'I.S.e Fez;`` it a. . t.y��..s l�t'<.i'�. �. £x s a -en z a ? s -� < s�,t•. x� v � es �z [ tm a tut}t,a •r i. k t.s. '}'f� s ` .S ! a S s x ?'T 7?'7 �, <• - ffrti �i3� 'r T i 4 .<�Y. 1'�' s}'.i .+ ✓r L Nsi:+a'�s� arr �.1.: e ♦ ! }� t r `>'s �fs` < ,�, r pt•� 1 fir- ,� r«.a. i T ,•Gr a ' 3 M .. r ft 9""r~>'JC 'h\?.•Y 4 •^e tif"✓c 1Z � /t r<t sty }.xs `+._1>a'.} aXx "•�ti pa= _. '� rF A�"7:� a > 3c't�� Y'"F.,�'lmlS. ..-ct^!s�>r'�. y'" fstl `rkenwVt"'_? rad•�..n� d�, ^^ tnrr �N wf x i t' V S` hhj �y«].ti' axk- s Z -'s+s 'Sr- `9 X.y 1WYYtiGL„RY ,4'^4 qr ".- i a +rm s..,,- k I� �a�ni 'se"1 tr. T. �_kr`l'`.4`� '�c_XS t�4F i'. a✓3��4.7.'�.f•cy0�`��"`��+"z3 y�� r' 1 T�@`v,.��r...�Y�i foJ� s.q`'3 yC'3>-« .T�'�i..W pi #i!�`'St?�Al..•`['`I�'sk'1?l[�Z'�z*` 'y � tr>i.y�'}i<:LRHy±hGr-y'�'�...•+tk`�i.�ls$�' `�s+T,}? T'J �il.is?�'^Y+3•. r i'4xx i*•xT h vrtM 'rY�+S�r 3 nt t`+ x ->:C }"��!!'�>u i-k.Ta �Y \' r+�' ^fk 4)`Y1t nsG"4f`u' `"tv. r :.t:Le` ,,•„di£`'s.f zw'�`' n^°,,.t'�t ,i£.uf`y�t}'n, Tr's'� Y Ty-Xni�` *. s < tz+tsxyv^ii X t '.�ae+� ,a ^3 r }s v3.'r' Sr''...5zta.'i ,4Y ,} ij. ✓ly.• ,,f.."�n?s.�'a•f�l.]'s; : rFSY[• ' a'l�+t'a"tr.f t t.,,s e�•FSsy`. ex "'.� .liT'. t. �.}•*a (.�f had•# i�+"s" +.A& 3c£v f't'`wL0i`rt f <��s2t M-'S'(` ,tyy4• JL'tr^x3'in' MON. • 'sfs� e � 5 T M wit".' _.. '�....x •>y2a �-;�Z>eo'-•=C a .. :is.,r'f"3� . „s --. -' .:•��v ..•.�._r 's eT�.,°^ _. s:• =,k.;4� �. . �,n- TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES 444 N. ARROWHEAD AVE. SUITE 203 SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92401 (909) 884-9700 FAX (909) 889-8050 January 22, 1993 Mr. Al Boughey, AICP Director, Department of Planning and Building Services 300 North `D' Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Dear Mr. Boughey: At the request of the City of San Bernardino, Tom Dodson & Associates (TDA) initiated an investigation of Sterling Heights project (Tentative Tract Map No. 14112, TT 14112) in order to advise the City regarding future procedural processing options for implementing the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This evaluation can serve as an Initial Study for the City to use in making a decision regarding the appropriate procedure for further CEQA processing. In the context of the CEQA, the projects in this instance appear to consist of two possible decisions by the City: 1) an extension of time for TT 14112; and 2) revision of the tract to implement the dedicated right-of-way for Sterling Avenue through TT 14112. The information developed from this research will be used to help guide the City in implementing either or both of these optional decisions affecting the site encompassed by TT 14112. The analysis that follows examines the facts that affect these two decisions and makes recommendations for City processing them. 1. Extension of Time Background After circulating an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)for Tentative Tract Map No. 14112 and Conditional Use permit No. 89-67 in 1990, the City Planning Commission certified the EIR and approved the projects on November 7, 1990. Specific conditions and a mitigation monitoring program were included in the approval by the Commission. Copies of both documents are provided as Attachments 1 and 2 to this evaluation. The applicant, Melcorp Investment, Inc.,has requested a time extension for Map No. 14112. According to the "Subdivision Map Act Manual" (Curtin 1992 Ed.), "certain tentative maps can be valid for six years. The Map Act itself mandates an initial two-year life and, by local ordinance, the city can extend that initial life up to an additional 12 months. § 66452.6(a). Pursuant to subsection(e) of Section 66452.6, the city may extend the time at which the map expires for a period or periods not to exceed a total of three years." According to the City Staff, the application for a time extension was filed in a timely manner and "Once the application for an extension is timely filed, the map is automatically extended for 60 days or until the city acts on the extension, whichever occurs first" The City is currently in this extended review period where the extension of time for TT 14112 is being considered. Issues and Analysis The first question raised by the City Staff was the issue regarding the applicability of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to the time extension for Tract Map No. 14112. The Subdivision Map Act Manual has the following comment regarding the type of decision a time extension is. "Although granting an extension of the tentative map is discretionary under Section 66452.6(3), the courts have held that the city's discretion is limited to questions of time..." However, in the process of extending the time for a tract map, the map can be subject to additional conditions. In other words, Section 66452.6(3) of the Subdivision Map Act (see Attachment 3) verifies that a time extension is a discretionary decision (to extend or not extend a tract map) for a city. Thus in my opinion, as a discretionary decision, a time extension is a project subject to the CEQA (see § 21080 of the CEQA and § 15002(i) of the State CEQA Guidelines). Given the assumption that the time extension is subject to CEQA, the Staff has asked'IDA to recommend the appropriate procedure for making a CEQA determination for the time extension decision. Given that an EIR was prepared and certified by the City for TT 14112, the controlling sections within CEQA are found at 1121166 in the law, Sections 15162, 15163, and 15164 of the State Guidelines. The test of whether an additional environmental document must be prepared trader §15162 is as follows: (a) Wicre an EIR or Negative Declaration has been prepared,no additional EIR need be prepared unless. (1) Subsequent changes are proposed in the project which will require important revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not considered in a previous EIR or Negative Declaration on the project, (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken,such m a substantial deterioration in the air quality where the project will be located, which will require important revisions in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not covered in a previous EIR or Negative Declaration;or (3) New information of substantial importance to the project becomes available, and (A) The information was not known and could not have been known at the time the prevdohs EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted and (B) The new information shows any of the following. 1. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed previously in the EIR; 2 Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; 3. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project;or 2 4. Mitigation measures or aftematives which were not previously considered in the EIR would substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the environment. Under § 15163 the test is as follows: (a) 77te Lead or Responsible Agency may choose to prepare a supplement to an EIR rather than a subsequent EIR if.. (1) Any of the conditions described in Section 15162 would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and (2) Only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation. Under § 15164 the test is as follows: (a) The Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency shall prepare an addendum to an EIR if.- (1)None of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred; (2) Only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the EIR underconsideration adequate under CEQA;and (3) The changes its One EIR made by the addendum do not raise important issues about the significant effects on the environment The proposed time extension for TT 14112 can be tested against the criteria contained within Sections 15162, 15163 and 15164 to determine whether a Subsequent EIR is required: 1. Have any subsequent changes been proposed for the project? The answer is no; the tract design remains the same, the conditions of approval remain the same,and the mitigation monitoring program remains the same. 2. Have substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken? A review of each issue addressed in the 1990 EIR (indicates that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the following issues: land use, traffic, geological resources, hydrology, cultural resources or public services and utilities. Off-highway vehicle activity (bicycles, 4-wheel drive trucks, and motorcycles/quads) and other ground distrubing activities(grading and trenching)have damaged the landscape,particularly along the eastern property boundary,and the aesthetic quality of the site is probably lower than that described in the 1990 EIR. Is this a substantial change under which the project is to be undertaken? The 1990 EIR concluded that with landscaping and contour grading the project could be developed without a significant aesthetic impact (see page 8). The aesthetic deterioration due to landscape damage will not alter the conclusion of significance and does not involve any new significant impacts not covered in the 1990 EIR. The potential aesthetic impact due to implementing TT 14112 is reduced due to the recent landscape deterioration and the landscaping required under TT 14112 condition of approval #45 will result in more benefit than under the circumstances of the original approval in 1990. Therefore,it is concluded that the changed aesthetic circumstances do not constitute "substantial changes" in circumstances as outlined §15162(a)(2). The same off-highway vehicle and ground disturbing activities that reduced site aesthetic values, particularly in the arroyo on the east edge of the property, have also reduced the quality of biological 3 resources described in the 1990 EIR. The damage along the eastern and southeastern edge of the property has removed several acres of ruderal grassland from productivity, a comparable amount of coastal sage scrub, and some of the California sycamores found in the unnamed stream canyon. The degradation of these biological resources changes site circumstances, but development of TT 14112 under these changed circumstances will not involve any new significant impacts that were not addressed in the 1990 EIR The implementation of condition of approval #45 will result in more biological resource enhancement under the changed circumstances- No new impacts will be created by granting a time eidension and no significant environmental impacts not covered in the 1990 EIR will occur. Therefore, it is concluded that the changed biological resource circumstances do not constitute 'substantial changes in circumstances as outlined in il5162(a)(2). 3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available using the criteria in 15162(a)(3)(13):1)No new significant effects will occur,2)Severity of impacts has not increased relative to those identified in the 1990 EIR;3)No infeasible alternatives or mitigation measures have been found to be feasible•,and 4)No new alternatives or mitigation measures have been identified that would reduce significant effects on the environment. Based on the evaluation provided above, no additional Subsequent EIR needs to be prepared before the City can consider the time extension for a decision. Further, since none of the criteria under §15162 apply, the proposed time extension does not qualify for a Supplemental EIR under §15163. Since none of the conditions in Section 15162 have occurred, the final tests that can be applied to determine if additional environmental documentation is necessary is found in §15164. The first test is whether only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the EIR under consideration adequate under CEQA. The second test is whether the changes to the EIR made by the addendum do not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the environment. As previously noted, TT 14112 will not be changed in any manner if a time extension is granted. Therefore, no new issues regarding significant effects on the environment (attributable to developing the tract) have been raised by this analysis. The information regarding the damage to onsite aesthetic and biological resources since approval of TT 14112 in 1990 can be considered a minor technical addition of information that will make the EIR under consideration adequate tinder CEQA for the time extension decision by the City. Conclusion, Extension of Time Therefore, to complete the procedural process for an extension of time for TT 14112,TDA recommends that the City incorporate the above analysis in a separate document and title it an Addendum to the Final Sterling Heights Environmental Impact Report as certified in November 1990. This Addendum will provide the data on the change in circumstances since TT 14112 was approved in 1990. The EIR and Addendum will allow the City to make a fully informed decision when it hears the request for a time extension for TT 14112. It is my conclusion that the 1990 certified EIR in combination with this Addendum will ensure full compliance with the CEQA and State and City CEQA Guidelines for the time extension. 4 Revision of TT 14112 to Include Sterling Avenue Background TT 14112 encompasses a 50-acre parcel of land at the northern terminus of Sterling Avenue as shown in attached Figures 3 and 5 (abstracted from the 1990 EIR). This parcel of land has been subject to a series of tract maps extending back to the mid-1970's. Initially approved as a conventional subdivision as TT 7301, the project was redesigned as a Planned Residential Development in 1977. In the 1981 the project was again redesigned and was approved by the City as Tentative Tract Map Nos. 11857-11860. It was during the approval of TT 11857-11860 that Sterling Avenue was identified for dedication as a local through street by the City of San Bernardino. When TT 11857 was recorded the right-of-way for Sterling Avenue was formally dedicated and accepted by the City. The engineering plans for Sterling Avenue, were also finalized and approved by the City. The street construction was bonded and its construction was scheduled to occur when the tract developed. Sterling Avenue from Foothill Drive south is identified as a Major Arterial on the 1989 General Plan Circulation Plan. North of Foothill Drive Sterling Avenue does not exist, but it is a dedicated local street with a 60-foot right-of-way. According to the City Staff, the Sterling Avenue right-of-way remains dedicated to the City at the present time. In 1990 the tract map submitted to the City, TT 14112, incorporated a private street system and showed Sterling Avenue north of Foothill Drive as a 425 foot long public road culminating in a cul-de-sac. Sterling Avenue is shown on TT 14112 as being constructed on through the property as a private road which was intended to provide access to developable properties to the north. TT 14112 shows a private road system providing access to the remainder of the 56 lot tract. The map approved by the City, Attachment 5, contains the language in the dedicated right-of-way for Sterling Avenue as 'TO BE VACATED." TDA spent considerable time reviewing the 1990 EIR, all conditions of approval associated with the tract, and the minutes of the two hearings held on TT 14112. The purpose was to determine whether the effect of vacating the dedicated right-of-way for Sterling Avenue was discussed during the City's review and approval of TT 14112. 1 could find no discussion of this issue in any of the documents or minutes of the hearing. Working with Mr. Greg Gubman of the Planning Staff, I reviewed the Development Code to ascertain the procedural process for vacating a road right-of-way (Reversion to Acreage). Table 31.01 of the Development Code indicates that the Threshold of Review for"Reversions to Acreage" is the Planning Commission. Reversions are described in Section 19.48.130 of the Development Code and the process is subject to Subdivision Map Act Section 66499.11 et seq.. A copy of Section 66499.11 is enclosed as Attachment 6. Other methods for vacating a street are available, but the tract map was used in this instance. Based on my evaluation of the Map Act and the City's Development Code, the dedicated right-of-way for Sterling Avenue has never been vacated and is therefore still in force and 5 effect. The primary reason is that the reversion to acreage has never taken place because TT 14112 has never been finalized and recorded by the owners. The request for a time extension by the applicant, Melcorp Investment, Inc., verifies this fad. Second,when the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 14112 it did not make the necessary findings regarding reversion to acreage. Specifically, 366499.15 and 366499.16 of The Subdivision Map Act (see Attachment 6) require the following: "A public hearing shall be held on the proposed reversion to acreage. Notice thereof shall be given in the time and manner provided in section 664513" and "Subdivided property may be reverted to acreage only if the legislative body finds that: (a) Dedications or offers of dedication to be vacated or abandoned by the reversion to acreage area unnecessary for present or prospective public purposes." I could find neither proper notification (Section 664513, Map Act) or findings made by the City to date. Given the above circumstances, I have concluded that the Sterling Avenue right-of-way along the eastern boundary of TT 14112 is a dedicated right-of-way and has not been vacated as was indicated on the tract map approved by the City Planning Commission. Issues and Analysis As reviewed and approved by the City Planning Commission,TT 14112 does not include the Sterling Avenue right-of-way (ROW) north of the cul-de-sac. The Sterling Avenue ROW was included in the tract as dedicated open space (Lot "B") that was to be deeded to the City (Condition 47) upon recordation, and Lot "B" was to be enhanced in accordance with a landscape plan to be approved by the City (Condition 45) (see Attachment 1 for conditions of approval). The 1990 EIR does not discuss installation of Sterling Avenue nor does it discuss the effects of vacating the ROW north of the cul-de-sac on the property. The City has asked TDA to evaluate the effect of incorporating the Sterling Avenue ROW back into the tract. One issue of concern, already resolved, was that the ROW shown as being vacated on TT 14112 appears to have been done without adequate evaluation and review. In essence, the City did not consider the effects on "present or prospective public purposes." Specifically, several potential residential development projects are under consideration north and east of TT 14112 (Secret Hollow and Little Sand Canyon) that are designed to rely upon the Sterling Avenue extension as a collector road for their primary access. At this time the Sterling Avenue ROW has not been vacated and the ROW is a dedicated roadway. No additional decision need be made by the City regarding the dedicated ROW; it exists and has not been vacated to date. The second, and more immediate procedural issue,is whether the 1990 EIR is adequate for reviewing and approving a revised TT 14112 with the Sterling Avenue ROW included as part of the project. In order to reach a conclusion regarding the appropriate CEQA procedural process to follow for such a revised project, the same comparative test used for the time extension (i.e., the criteria in State CEQA Guideline Sections 15162, 15163 and 6 15164) will be used in this analysis. However, before making this comparison it is first necessary to define what changes would be required in TT 14112 to accommodate Sterling Avenue in the existing dedicated right-of-way as shown in Attachment 5. Then, these changes must be evaluated in the context of the content of the 1990 EIR as certified by the Planning Commission, The Sterling Avenue ROW extends along the eastern boundary of TT 14112 from its current terminus with Foothill Drive through the whole length of the property from north to south. Within the property boundary it terminates at the intersection with Daley Canyon Road(the tract's northeastern boundary)which is also shown as being vacated. It continues north onto property currently owned by RSA. The continuation of Sterling is not of specific concern to this evaluation and will not be given further consideration. If Sterling Avenue is to be included in TT 14112 what are the physical environmental consequences? Based on a review of the final engineered street improvements plans for Sterling Avenue, the following changes would occur to open space LAtS "B" and "E", TT 14112: Of the 355,000 square feet (ft),or 8.1 acres of open space provided in Lot"B",about 4.1 acres will be disturbed by construction of the proposed Sterling Avenue road. The breakdown of this disturbance is as follows': 1. Road ROW (60'wide, Lot"B") = —2.0acres 2. Slope and pad development easterly of the road ROW = —0.7aaes 3. Flat fill area westerly of the road ROW = —12acres 4. Slopes and Canyon Edge Circle ROW = —0.2 S. Total disturbed area Lot "B" = —4.1acres 6. Remaining undisturbed area in Lot"B" = 4 acres Lot "E" contains 141,000 ft2 or 32 acres of open space. The breakdown of disturbance within this lot is as follows: 1. Road ROW (6(r wide, Lot"E") = —02acre 2. Slopes and development on both sides of the road ROW = 03 acre 3. Total disturbed area Lot "E" = 05 acre 4. Remaining undisturbed area in Lot "E" = 2.7 acres ' All acreage was calculated using a planimeter on 1" = 40' wale preliminary engineering drawings 7 The total area impacted by construction of Sterling Avenue, as calculated from the final engineering drawings, within TT 14112 is forecast to be about 4.6 acres. Out of a total of 19 acres of open space, the loss of 4.6 acres represents about 24% of the project open space. How would the TT 14112 Map and supporting documentation have to be revised to accommodate inclusion of Sterling Avenue through the tract? Based on my review preliminary of the tract map, conditions of approval, and mitigation monitoring reporting program, the following revisions would be required: L The entrance off of Sterling Avenue into the tract would have to be redesigned. 2. Lots 3,4.5, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 may have to be reconfigured to provide for adequate 21 slopes from the road pad up to the lots on the top of the hill. 3. Lots 23, 24 and 25 would have to be redesigned to allow Sterling Avenue to pass through to Daley Canyon Road, i.e. the northeastern property boundary. 4. Open space lots "B', "D" and "E" would have to be reconfigured. 5. Daley Canyon Road would be replaced by the existing graded road along the flood control channel. This road is 24'wide and would be paved south to Bonita Vista Road as a secondary access that would meet the City's minimum 24' wide standard. 6. The following conditions of approval apparently will need revision #38: Sterling Avenue will eliminate the proposed retention(detention)basin shown in the southeast comer of the tract. The whole stream canyon will be altered and the existing natural channel will be eliminated. The adequacy of the man-made drainage system along Sterling Avenue and out to Elm Street where the flows from this canyon are released onto the local street system will need to be reevaluated in light of the extent of disturbance within this drainage basin that will be caused by the road and appurtenant structures. The proposed Sterling Avenue engineering plan identifies a small,modified detention basin for controlling flows and the City's drainage analysis indicates that it will cause flows to be reduced downstream from the detention basin. #42 The final engineering design for Sterling Avenue appears to have been prepared in 1985. Grading requirements were substantially revised, particularly in the 1-fillside Management Overlay District,by the 1989 City General Plan and 1990 City Development Code. The grading for Sterling Avenue should be reviewed to ensure that it Conforms to the Code and to the grading which will be implemented in the trail Condition#42 should be revised to reflect this requirement. #44: This condition requires the developer to obtain a Section 404 Permit from the Corps of Engineers prior to grading. A Corps permit may be needed for the project and for the construction of Sterling Avenue. On the other hand,before Sterling Avenue can be constructed a Department of Fish and Game (DFG) 1601 Stream Alteration Agreement will have to be obtained. A copy of the DFG code, including section 1601 is provided as Attachment 7. #45: All riparian vegetation and the stream channel will be eliminated by installing Sterling Avenue. This condition will have to be revised to indicate that riparian habitat will be provided as 8 • determined in the 1601 Agreement approved as mitigation/compensation for the loss of the stream channel and sycamores on the project site. #46: This condition will have to be eliminated. Drainage and Flood Control Standard Requirement #13, #14, and #16: These conditions will have to be expanded to include Sterling Avenue in their requirements. Grading Standard Reouirements #18 and #21: These conditions will have to be revised or deleted to address the inclusion of Sterling Avenue. Street Improvements and Dedications Standard Requirement #40, #41, #51 and #62: These conditions will have to be revised to include Sterling Avenue in their requirements. 6. The following mitigation monitoring program requirements would need to be revised: Traffic and Circulation Measures #2 and #3: These two measures address the Sterling Avenue entrance to the property and they will have to be modified to accommodate the Sterling Avenue as a public wllector road. Biological Resource Measures #2 b, d and g: These measures address revegetation and protection of biological resources in the drainage basin on the cast side of the property. H dr to Erosion Measures #4: The detention basin will be removed or altered by installation of Sterling Avenue and this measure will have to be revised. AE5thetic Msual Measures #2. Installation of Sterling Avenue will eliminate the existing sycamores and this measure will have to be revised. The final document that would require revision to address the installation of Sterling Avenue as a public collector road is the 1990 EIR. A comment is appropriate at this time regarding the status of Sterling Avenue. Although the dedicated road right-of-way (ROW) for Sterling Avenue is in place, the 1990 EIR and the approved TT 14112 represented this ROW as to be vacated. Thus, even though the ROW was never actually vacated, the information presented to the public and the City Planning Commission concluded that it was vacated and assumed that the drainage basin on the east side of the tract would be protected as open space. Therefore, in order to include Sterling Avenue as part of the tract 9 • it will be necessary to revise the EIR in order to provide adequate information to support the redesign of the tract map as outlined above. The major environmental issues of concern from installing Sterling Avenue are the loss of open space in Lot "B" and "E", increased noise from traffic on Sterling Avenue, and loss of biological resources. As described above, the installation of Sterling Avenue will transfer approximately 4.6 acres of open space to developed area. With Sterling Avenue the project will contain 35.6 acres of developed area and 14.4 acres of open space relative to 19 acres of open space and 31 acres of developed area under the existing tract design. A review of the traffic volumes that may occur on Sterling Avenue indicates that ultimate traffic on the portion through the tract should be less than 3,500 trips per day. This is based on an estimated maximum 350 residential units (assumes 10 trips per day per unit) that may be constructed in the area which would depend on Sterling Avenue as primary access. A review of the City General Plan Update Technical Background Report (Envicom 1988) indicates that the highest measured noise level for City public roads with average daily traffic between 5,000 and 10,000 trips per day is 65 dBA Lao at 100 feet distance from the road center line. The range is from 62 dBA to 65 dBA 4.. This is within acceptable noise standards as defined in the 1989 City General Plan Noise Element. The final major issue of concern is biological resources. The 1990 EIR characterized a scattered stand of small California sycamores in the drainage basin where Sterling Avenue would be located as a significant biological resource. The remainder of the site's biological • resources were not identified as being significant and no riparian habitat was identified on the site although a small stream channel occupies the bottom of the stream canyon on the eastern edge of the property where Sterling Avenue would be constructed. Part of the reason the ottom of the canyon has little riparian vegetation is that drainage pipes carry a portion of the runoff from upstream areas below the ground surface. What is the status of these resources today? A field review was conducted by TDA and photos are attached to this report at Attachment 8 which document the status of biological resources along the Sterling Avenue ROW across TT 14112. This area has been severely degraded by off-road vehicle activity and ground disturbing activities in the drainage basin including the property to the east. As a result, severe erosion has occurred along the small stream channel at the bottom of the canyon as can be seen in the attached photos. Based on the field review of the site and a careful evaluation of the stand of sycamores, the existing biological resources within the Sterling Avenue ROW should not be considered "significant"biological resources. By including Sterling Avenue in the project approximately four acres of ruderal (nonnative) grassland will be lost; approximately S acres of coastal sage habitat will be lost; and approximately .1 acre of stream channel and California sycamores will be eliminated. Other issues of less concern are the increased area of grading which will require erosion control as already outlined in the environmental document; enhanced circulation to the area 10 • from better quality public road access; modifications to the drainage system the must be integrated into the on- and off-site drainage system as already required by existing conditions of approval; additional short-term construction impacts that will require greater dust and noise control to minimize impacts on surrounding residential areas; and alterations to the visual setting in the Sterling Avenue ROW which will require extensive landscaping to minimise visual impacts. The dedicated road already includes a requirement for landscaping disturbed areas of the road alignment. Given this information regarding the physical environmental changes that would be caused by constructing Sterling Avenue as part of TT 14112, the test of whether an additional environmental document must be prepared can be applied as outlined in §15162. 1. Have any subsequent changes been proposed for the project? Yes,TT 14112 would be redesigned and Sterling Avenue would be constructed to provide access to property suitable for residential development to the north and east of TT 14112 Do these changes require important revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not considered in the previous EIR for the project? The answer to this question depends on the determination of whether the physical environmental changes outlined above are considered significant. Lets examine the significance of additional physical environmental impacts from installing Sterling Avenue: a. Is the loss of 4.6 acres of 19 acres of open space significant? This is a subjective issue upon which the 1989 General Plan and the 1990 Development Code do not provide dear guidance. Wth the loss of 4.6 acres to Sterling Avenue across the tract the total open space is reduced from 38% of the site to about 29% of the 50 aces_ The loss of this amount of open space given its poor quality should probably not be considered a significant adverse environmental impact based on the overall open space retained on the project site. b. Is the increased noise due to future traffic on Sterling Avenue significant? No,based on the City's General Plan Noise Element the noise impacts will be less than significant since they will be below 65 dBA Lao. C. Is the loss of biological resources and the stream channel significant? Given the current poor quality of these resources,including the sycamores,the loss of these resources is not significant in either a site sp=Mc or cumulative context. By requiring the agent that develops Sterling Avenue to replace the sycamores at a minimum 3:1 ratio and that these be large (50 gallon containers or larger) trees,the habitat values of the existing sycamores can be easily replaced. Is the loss of the stream channel significant? The existing site does not have any riparian habitat value due to past human activities and the damage attributed to off-highway vehicle activity and other ground disturbing activities sine TT 14112 was approved in 1990. If the remaining area adjacent to Sterling Avenue is irrigated and intensively planted with native plant species,including riparian habitat species,then the habitat value of the area can be substantially enhanced from its current status. The specific revegetation effort should be negotiated with the Department of Fish and Game when the 1601/1603 Stream Alteration Agreement is obtained from the Department. 11 • d. Do any of the other impacts from installing Sterling Avenue (erosion, runoff, short-term construction, etc) pose significant changes in the physical environment that have not been described. Mitigation measures and conditions of approval have been included for each of • these impacts in the original TT 14112 approval. These measures need to be=ended to cover the Sterling Avenue impacts and with implementation of these measures,no significant adverse impacts are forecast for this physical environmental changes. 2. Have substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances tinder which the project will be undertaken? This issue was addressed under the discussion for the time extension and the conclusion is that changes have occurred but they are not substantial and do not affect the significance of project impacts. 3. Has new information become available that is of substantial importance to the project? Yes, Sterling Avenue ROW has not been vacated and the City and TT 14112 applicants wish to include Sterling Avenue in the revised tract map. However, using the criteria in 15162(a)(3)(B) and the analysis above: 1) No new significant environmental effects will occur from including Sterling Avenue if the mitigation described above is implemented;2) Impacts previously described for the project were not significant and the inclusion of Sterling Avenue increases these impacts, but based on implementing the additional mitigation measures these impacts have not increased to a significant level; 3) No infeasible alternatives or mitigation measures have been found to be feasible; and 4) No new alternatives or mitigation measures have been identified that would reduce significant effects on the environment. Based on the evaluation provided above, no additional Subsequent EIR needs to be prepared before the City can consider the a revised tract map that would include Sterling Avenue as part of the decision. Further, since none of the criteria under §15162 apply, the proposed tract revision to include Sterling Avenue does not qualify for a Supplemental EIR under §15163. Since none of the conditions or criteria in Section 15162 apply to the proposed project, the final tests that can be applied to determine if additional environmental documentation is necessary is found in §15164. The first test is whether only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the EIR under consideration adequate under CEQA. The second test is whether the changes to the EIR made by the addendum do not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the environment. As noted in the analysis, TT 14112 will be revised to include the extension of Sterling Avenue through the property under this alternative decision. Therefore, new issues regarding significant effects on the environment (attributable to developing the tract) have been raised by this analysis and these potential impacts have been evaluated and found to be nonsignificant. The information regarding the damage to ousite aesthetic and biological resources since approval of TT 14112 in 1990 can be considered a minor technical addition of information that should be made available to the City's decision-makers in order for the EIR under consideration adequate under CEQA for the revised tract map (TT 14112) decision by the City. 12 Conclusion, Revised Tract Map, TT 14112, With Sterling Avenue The analysis provided above shows that including Sterling Avenue in revisions to TT 14112 will cause additional adverse environmental impacts to occur. Based on the evaluation of constructing and operating Sterling Avenue, the potential environmental impacts will not be significant. Therefore, if the Staff and City decision-makers concur that the impacts described above are not significant, to complete the procedural process for a revised TT 14112 decision, TDA suggests that the City incorporate the above analysis in a separate document and title it an Addendum to the Final Sterling Heights Environmental Impact Report as certified in November 1990. This Addendum will provide the data on the additional impacts and the change in circumstances since TT 14112 was approved in 1990. Because of the controversy and subjective perceptions in the community regarding the resources onsite and the addition of Sterling Avenue,I also strongly suggest that distribution of this information as a Supplement to the 1990 EIR would be a more conservative procedural approach given the scale of change and the potential for different interpretation of the impacts caused by Sterling Avenue. Regardless, if the City chooses to use the Addendum approach, the information provided will allow the City to make a fully informed decision when it hears the revised TT 14112 Map application. It is my conclusion that the 1990 certified EIR in combination with either an Addendum or Supplement will ensure full compliance with the CEQA and State and City CEQA Guidelines. After a decision on the method of processing is made,TDA will prepare the documentation that will be used by the City for consideration of a revised TT 14112. Please do not hesitate to give me a call if you have any questions regarding the information in this letter report. Sincerely, Tom Dodson Attachments 13 Jam-y� � 'W +�' M On IST ova w a . 1 - 'r • ,`�•h1� KP �`I `cvi � ` '.111 / ��. ""J'�, a,4•,°,� I 1 ♦y � .� i SL-3 I �GL � _ t►on P ~A O 2 21 p, y :r LEGEND 1 SPHERE OF INFLUENCE RL RESIDENTIAL LOW `,_—_—__----_ RS RESIDENTIAL SURBURBAN RM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM LLL•••���� 1 RMH RESIDENTIAL MEONM HGH RH RESIDENTIAL SIDENTIAL f1K,FI 1 CN COMMERCIAL NEI(aFIBORHOOD .... CG 4 COMMERCIAL GENERAL 1 C _ O1 COMMERCIAL OFFICE 1 L� PFC PUBLIC FLOOD CONTROL PF PUBLIC f AC(IT Y MWi HLLS DE MANAGEMENT GEMEN OVERLAY DISTRICT R L 1 w O p� w O 1 I F GOTH L l OR RS R L 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 , 1 1 CN RS 1 PFJ RM ; PFC RS kwA MARSHALL BLVD RM RM C RM PF PF 1 RH R RM CO-1 > CN >< RS < RS lyl 1 Q < PF < RS = o PFC o 0 1 Y ,. o RMH W RS < 1 > RS ' 1 DATE ST PFC RM/ RM ;RS RS PF CG-1 RS PF RM LAND USE MAP AND THE HILLSIDE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT I CENTER STERLING HEIGHTS EIR Figure 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO WARNER W. HODGDON HEART BAR RANCH.ARROWHEAD SPRINGS POST OFFICE 90X 1116 SAN aERNARDMO.CALIFORNIA 91106 (714)881-1547 TEIXCOM February 20, 1994 (+11)896-9961 Chief William Wright City of San Bernardino 200 East Third Street San Bernardino,California 92410 RE: Planning Commission Agenda Items February 8, 1993 City/Stubblefield Sub-Standard East/West Rt.330/City Creek Canyon Primary/Secondary Access 25/99 Year Development Agreement,Variance and Special Development Code Amendment Dear Chief Wright: Thank you and Fire Marshall Guy Burdick in advance for reviewing the enclosed and regarding the above related subject(s). I write you with the deepest respect and commitment to the City's well being. Please call if you have questions or comments. As you know from your attending and presenting sworn testimony to the Planning Commission on February 8, 1994, I have constructive concerns, but with constructive solutions as to the Sub-Standard east/west Rt. 330 Freeway/City Creek Canyon Primary and Secondary Access. This includes, but not limited to, City Sub-Standard to Full-Standard major liability improvement cost and City Sub-Standard Secondary Emergency Access procedure liability onto the non-access Rt. 330 Freeway; i.e.: stop Rt. 330 Freeway traffic,cut down the non-access six foot chain link fence and remove the post to then enter onto a crushed rock secondary emergency road. Forwarded herewith for your official records is my February 8, 1994 Letter Report, Documentation and Photolog to the Planning Commission and incorporated January 31, 1994 applicable letter attached thereto, to Al Boughey, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement. They were read and/or submitted for the Official Planning Commission Record on February 8, 1994. (For Reference:See February 8,1994 and January 31,1994 Letter Report,Book Docummtatim and Photolog) Subsequently, I have written Mr. Boughey by my February 18, 1994 letter regarding the February 8, 1994 meeting and result. Certainly Mr. Boughey and others position as to supporting this Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary Emergency Access were validated by the Planning Commission's approval action (vote 4 to 5). Never-the-less I respect your and Fire Marshall Burdick's qualified position given on February 8, 1994 and further confirmed in your February 1, 1994 Fire Department Interoffice Memorandum to Mr. Boughey. Accordingly, by February 2, 1994 Interoffice Memorandum the Director of Public Works and City Engineer also wrote to Mr. Boughey as to the 99 year Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access Development Agreement. Though Mr. Boughey, Stubblefield and others advocate Sub- Standard east/west RL 330 Freeway Access, in fact there are two (2)different Full-Standard accesses feasible that could be economical feasible that could be economical and physically improved therefore.therefore In effect, even under the Special Development Code Amendment, this would negate the need for the 99 year Stubblefield Sub-Standard Development Agreement. (See attached February 1,1994 Fire Chief Wright Memorandum RE:RL 330 Freeway Sub-Standard Access) HERITAGE OF THE MOUHTAMS AND VALEEY IEGAN M 1950 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFNCE WX 1IK,ARROWHEAD WRNGS,SAN BERNARDINO,CALIFORNIA 91106 RESIDENCE MARMG:5195 aROADMOOR Wtti EVARD,sAN RERHARDMO,CALMRPRA 91109,(714)9 95-015 5 WWW A WARNER V.NOIXAON FA60.Y GLOM ARaIATE Page 2 (See attached February 2,1994 City Engineer Hardgrave Memorandum RE:Rt.330 Freeway Sub-Standard Access) As you know I outlined this graphically on the Sub-Standard Access map available at the February 8, 1994 Commission Meeting. Planning's folly of the narrow unpaved 12 foot wide Recreation Trail Tunnel being a recognized Emergency Health and Safety Access is demeaning; when in fact Full-Standard 24 foot wide with added 4 foot walk and 16 foot high passage can be readily improved. This would connect both east/west Rt. 330 Freeway Primary/Secondary Roads and the adopted City General Plan FEIR Foothill Recreation Trails alignment. This also "links" the S. B. County City Creek Connector and the October 1992 City of Highland Recreation Trails Alignment with the lower Santa Ana River and Upper Santa Ana River National Trail System-San Gorgonio Wilderness Area. As you remember on June 4, 1992 Planning, City Engineering and Fire preferred the Full- Standard Sterling Avenue Area and RSA-Secret Hollow Ranch Primary/Secondary Access with included 24 foot wide plus 4 foot walk and 16 foot height multi-plate "Passage". This access area also accommodated the adopted July 3, 1989 City General Plan Foothill Recreation Trails alignment via the USFS/RSA IN26 Road. Enclosed herewith is another copy of the previously provided Schematic Plan and Cross Sections for this Full-Standard Primary/Secondary Access and Passage. For visual perception I also enclose a Photolog of the existing "Victoria Passage" built in Rancho Cucamonga. Letters of concurrence were City Engineering Department May 27, 1992, SBC Flood Control April 21, 1993 and City Fire May 10, 1993. (Sec attached 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Primary/Secondary Access and Landscape/Mitigation Plan with Improvement/Maintenance District(s)) (See attached May 27,1993 City Engineer Letter RE: Full-Standard Access Tunnel 24 feet wide) (See attached May 21,1993 S.B.County Flood Control letter) (See attached May 10,1993 S.B.Fire Department Letter) Hopefully, you can appreciate that this Full-Standard approach for available RL 330 two (2) different Full-Standard Accesses better commands support for Health and Safety with Environmental esthetics. As you know, we volunteered to participate in the proportionate cost thereof and as part of an overall Full-Standard improvement/maintenance district(s). RL 330 is a Scenic Highway. Stop freeway traffic,cut the Freeway six foot chain link fence down,pull up the post to access an unpaved emergency access road does not make good health and safety "Common Sense". Recent FBI Report and other facts point to a poor portrait of the City according to Acting Police Chief Wayne Harp. Crime, Murder, 38% Welfare, 17% Unemployment,decreasing Jobs and Tax Base cannot further support the Police and Fire 60%± demand on the City General Fund. Rancho Cucamonga in the West Valley is only 2% Welfare. May I strongly recommend that Full- Standards are required for the City's sound Socio/Economic future. Thank you and Fire Marshall Burdick for your time and dedication. �Respectfully, Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Mayor and Common Council James F.Penman,City Attorney Shauna Clark,City Administrator Al Boughey,Director of Planning,Building Services and Code Enforcement Greg Gubman,Associate Planner MERMAGE OF TM MOUMrA MD VALLEY BEGAN W t650 (� QMEADQUARTEa F OEF[Q BOX 31".ARROOnQAD STRINGS.SAM BEAM R O.GMdORMA 92 0 W RESIDE MA :3395 aROADMOOR M3UIEVARD,SAM aERMARDINO,t:.USFOR 9M01,1714)6110153 WW A VARWX V.INIOLDDM FA XLL LION Mrn n ATTACHMENT "D" SAN BERNARDINO CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Al Boughey, Director, Planning and Building Services FROM: Will Wright, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Stubblefield Access Agreement DATE: February 1 , 1994 COPIES: Guy Burdick, Fire Marshal I have reviewed the draft Development Agreement for Stubblefield Construction Company relative to the proposal for a non-standard secondary access. Pursuant to the proposed Development Code Amendment pertaining to revised access requirements, I have the following comments: 19.30.200(6)(A) 1 . Based on the information available, there does not seem to be a feasible way to provide a standard, secondary access. The proposed non- standard, secondary access will provide emergency access and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 19.30.200(6)(B) 1 . Addressed above. 2. As proposed in the Development Agreement, the proposed non-standard secondary access will be designed and maintained to support fire apparatus and will be sufficient to provide all weather driving capability. The surface must be able to support the imposed load of fire apparatus, but does not necessarily need to meet the definition of an all weather surface pursuant to Uniform Fire Code, 1991 edition. 3. As proposed in the Development Agreement, the proposed route will be 24 feet in width. Stubblefield Access Agreement February 1, 1994 Page Two 19.30.200(6)(C) 1 . Upon development, all structures shall be provided with interior automatic sprinklers. The design and installation shall be reviewed for approval by the Fire Department for compliance utilizing the National Fire Protection Association 13R standards. 2. The Fire Department will comment on the length of cul-de-sacs and total permitted units upon submittal of a specific development proposal. 4. Upon review of a specific development proposal, the Fire Department will add any conditions deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. 19.30.200(6)(D) 3. Because the subject property is located in Fire Zone C abutting wildlands, the Fire Department will review for approval the fire model at the time a specific development proposal is submitted. 4. As a standard review procedure, the Fire Department will review any proposed gates or other forms of controlled access at the time a specific development proposal is submitted. In conclusion, the proposed non-standard secondary access will provide a minimum adequate access to ensure that the public health, safety and welfare is maintained. F E 8 0 2 1994 C I T Y O F S A N B E R N A R D I N O CIAP M W' FPLANtNCO INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM JEPAF7fdEN f Of F=P.NNING & SU—'V NG SEAV!CES TO: Al BOUGHEY, Director of Planning/Building Services FROM: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer SUBJECT: Stubblefield Access Agreement DATE: February 2, 1994 COPIES: File No. 7. 01-29; Reading File --------------------------------------------------------------- I have reviewed the draft Development Agreement proposed by the Stubblefield' s pertaining to access and feel that it is con- sistent with the proposed Development Code Amendment for non- standard secondary access. 19 . 30. 200 (A) (1) The Stubblefield' s propose to use the East Frontage Road for their primary access. There is no feasible way to provide a standard, secondary access to the site. (2) A standard, secondary access to the site is not required for circulation purposes in that the primary access can handle the potential traffic associated with development of the site. 19 . 30 . 200 (B) (4) As noted above, and addressed in the Initial Study, the East Frontage Road can handle the traffic anticipated from development of the Stubblefield' s property. A secondary access is not required from a traffic/circulation stand- point and a separate traffic analysis is not required. 19. 30. 200 (C) (2) At the time a development application is submitted, Public Works will review and comment on the number of proposed units . AL BOUGHEy Stubblefield Agreement February 2, 1994 Page - 2 - 19. 30. 200 (D) (1) The proposed MOU with Caltrans addresses the use of non- standard, secondary access for emergency purposes. (4) If gates or other forms of controlled access are proposed in conjunction with a development application, Public Works will review and provide comments. ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Director of Public Works/City Engineer RGH:rs y� '} s` cn 3 �yr't9 'R elIItT`w.Fd+'^ x ` +,nt k•• ? 'alti"'`'1���.t t4 C 6Xi-'�b^ S w{2tav� t1 �� �". 4�. �,s��ai e�.V�1 �• <hh.'iSii �yh x`"J����' � eJ- / t %as � +���y.'��'� t .x' :.' t .} ` �f,, r' f . y-r 4 a�:�..�a�°� ,•{*�< E, •> y... r Y a` «f- ���� .1.5Y�. �7�sF Sr .e l tp�a� _ � �,i3 �,zvz t•�1 �A .�,' 'p'�C'�' 4r'4,y� A ''t . "+i ' `Ct�'.s�y �,�1 xae- '�qct�', a�t "s_.a T�.*v u3✓ t ..L"Y" E. 't� .1a y,�.� ; '�FrvF' < Sr'y, A¢4,�'`Y arfF}•F*.- '�Y> k .`' 5 , �A `Y} 3J�'. i3-' A 1..ORI WE "" 'r •G t Ri`F'�3 /a '�i � ,t Q 1�'(r ¢ �¢:�3+� �r � �v l,,y.,.��.�Trst• ��` v Wr c� ' , {y'S�'� �l+x-w �y.. jlY4 s. s>h a`R�t��'P'N' x` .;tr4 � 1< ` .jt•!t'�''�4,y`�di'tS�"$c � ���d�y� � �dY� �`p{.� �,q� ��• &t"S�i'' s I-., Vic. �".-1'• ✓`',Y�t} �' d qty'= '£�5 53�� �`FF� �� Cxs � x y 7�3G'g •'. �PAR� RUN— s ra`'n" §a r X R y t 4A, "�Fa Y..i �^' q¢ SS iAati��g ��tt����� '? � r� x > s:'.•(g a' '�`,�7yy L cP'+' v`"( �.* ay l !R�la x��+ riv > a v0 `"�v.T`}�.,�se � "i' d��4., r� •""`�' v rSnLa�,� � +n �� tx ��r.5"�ir' " }'-�Ix�a°'�3�� •�' � y m � � ry���,w� ,�.�.a',t ��y '� 5t'�r'Sp +�'�}R " �r- $•.r•#i„y,,°` �3,• '��` ,,y.�t` .��»" �'c�c"wA,,,.�.i]tt tz-A TRANSPORTATION/FLOOD CONTROL DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF ED[p BRNAR ..w.ab 825 East Third Street • San Bamardino, CA 92415-0835 • (7141387-2800 9 KEN A. MILLER April 21, 1993 Fax No. (7141387-2667 ",lr�y�" Director Roger G. Hardgrave Director of Public Works City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino CA 92418 File: 2-506/1.00 REFERENCE: ZONE 2 - DALEY BASIN - PROPOSED REALIGNMENT OF STERLING AVENUE NORTH OF FOOTHILL DRIVE Dear Mr. Hardgrave: This is in response to a request by Michael Grubbs of your staff requesting Flood Control District comments on the above referenced proposal. It appears that the proposed realignment will follow the alignment adopted prior to the approval of Tract 14112 for Tract 11857. The realignment will more closely follow the tract boundary and not meander through the development. Also, it appears that only a few lots would have frontage along the street. The District favors the realignment for several reasons. Access to Daley Basin will be mainly over collector streets and not the existing residential street access. Basin maintenance and debris removal could take place with less disruption to area residents. Since the access to the basin could now be on non-residential streets, the possibility for traffic accidents will be decreased. Also, because of the above stated problems, the District has been unable to dispose of debris offsite and we are running out of room to stockpile it onsite. If the District can be of any additional assistance in this matter please feel free to contact Kenneth D. Guidry of my staff at (909) 387-2515 or me at (909) 387-2623. Sincerely, LL/ KEN A. MILLER Flood Control Engineer KAM:KDG:kdg/STERLING cc: Ken Guidry FIRE PREVENTION MAY 1 1 1993 MEMORANDUM CITY OF SAN BEBNARDIND OEPAR7MENT OF PLANNING BUICJING St:mVICES TO: Al Boughey, Director Planning & Building Services FROM: E. Guy Burdick, Fire Marshal CZ46 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 14112 (Sterling Heights) DATE: May 10, 1993 tat-/ It is the opinion of the Fire Department that Sterling Avenue above Foothill should be retained as a public right-of-way. This right- of-way would allow emergency vehicles that respond on these streets to rapidly respond into this area. Our experience has shown that small and winding residential streets like those proposed for the Sterling Heights Tract are highly restrictive and can be very congested in emergencies. These response vehicles would include fire engines, ambulances, water tenders, tractor trailer rigs hauling dozers, task force teams and numerous other related agency vehicles. The response time in the foothill areas is presently delayed due to the uphill grade and when this type of construction continues it will extend emergency response times because of the narrow and winding streets. when these streets are residential, the response time can only increase more because of children playing in or near the street and vehicles parked curb-side or backing out of driveways. For the above reasons, Sterling Avenue is the recommended main route for access into the Sterling Heights area. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 300 NORTH"D-'STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92418 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROGER G.IAROGRAVE Diewtm f PWIic W.*, May 27, 1992 File: TR 15185 Warner W. Hodgdon Heart Bar Ranch, Arrowhead Springs P. 0. Box 2146 San Bernardino, CA 92406 SUBJECT: Woodland Heights Specific Plan/EIR - Adequacy of Tunnel as Primary Access Dear Mr. Hodgdon: On May 1, 1992, we received a document entitled "Woodland Heights - Primary and Secondary Road Access, " depicting two means of access for the subject project, the primary one being a 360 ' long tunnel with a 24 '- 9" roadbed with a minimum clearance above the roadbed of 14'- 6" . A 4 ' wide sidewalk is shown on one side and the tunnel is on an 8.58 grade. Although we have not yet been presented design details, such as lighting, ventilation system, structural adequacy, drainage, etc. , we can state that the proposed tunnel dimensions meet the minimum criteria for a private access road and can provide adequate primary traffic access for the proposed project. We are providing this letter in response to your verbal request on May 26, 1992. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (714) 384-5179. ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Director of Public Works/City Engineer MICHAEL W. GR B S Senior Civil Engineer cc: Al Boughey, Director of Planning & Building Service Will Wright, Fire Chief PRIDE IN PROGR SS 17141384-5111 — 384-5112 ��� •� � iii � ;�/ ,P c"�a�`� �. �MAN cy �, /�� j-+• I~ fir~•V�• , n � u o� A RTy. I . I s ��L 'mac * •�.\,.` LMDO^.An TRFA7MEM7 AT PRNMY E!MMY GM SMELM3 DOOM BECTON-•V' J. 2 3 + 4' FA 41? l N s naNNa ons ,Dh �. a° • '� s , SMR0.DR7¢a AVENUE 6AWMC,%M C®RFd6M •--.ad..,a. ••••w,auw SECnON-TW EAST®Afi.E9 CAM OM RAID LMDSCARIE TRIEATmSE V o- w 6ELTIX1.'CC p� 1-. A .Q 2. ENNJYICOEYFLC/YFNIIGEM7___ _,-_a. ur�m.-.-.�.. �nr....• STERLING AVENUE AREA PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ACCESS IMPROVEMENT S MAINTENANCE DISTRICTt w a I T T SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPEIMITIGATION PLAN -- --- MA� dfs •. 42• . ,�� \fir• rZ�:... NU. F 1221, • Gv F Lit ••R' t e .a.�,, .••fit ,y,. ,• .A • X 3ii�c�i b/ �ari� r�ti�•t "4 } I ! I I� � y V All ; =W 3 � tttttttttt `, � F Mkli N �7 IF N .,tl I TvIt I f Fs IT n (� WARNER W. HODGDON S ��ulnJI N eu WX 2 AaaowHUD sruNCs SAN tERNARDINO.CAIIFORMA 939D6 1]14)991.150 TEIJ:ODPY: (Tlgttf-99fi April 5, 1994 Chief William Wright City of San Bernardino 200 East Third Street San Bernardino, California 92410 RE: Stubblefield East/West Rt. 330 City Sub-Standard Access April 4, 1994 Council/Planning Agenda Items 35 and 36 City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements Report dated April 4, 1994 East/West Rt. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police,Fire,Emergency, Recreation Trails (Walking,Jogging, Bicycle,Equestrian) Dear Chief Wright: Enclosed is my February 20, 1994 letter to you regarding the related February 8, 1994 Planning Commission meeting. Aaron and I had not delivered same to you as Planning Director Boughey held-up the initial represented February 21, 1994 Council Meeting consideration until April 4, 1994. I briefly spoke with you at the Council Chambers April 4, 1994 following Aaron and my City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements presentation, i.e.: East/West Rt. 330 City Creek Full-Standard Access Roads, Police, Fire, Emergency, Recreation Trails (walking,jogging, bicycle, equestrian). At that time I had submitted for the Public Record and relative thereto my February 18 and 20 and April 4, 1994 letters to Director Boughey. In addition, I submitted my applicable April 4, 1994 letter to the Mayor and Common Council. In addition we had prepared an April 4, 1994 75 page City Creek Scenic Highway Report titled the same as our presentation referenced above paragraph two. Enclosed herewith are copies of my April 4, 1994 letter to the Mayor and Council with Report. (See enclosed Warner Hodgdon April 4, 1994 letter and Report to Mayor and Council RE: East/West Rt. 330 Sub- Standard Access) As you know, we cannot support City Sub-Standards for public Health and Safety, let alone for the City Creek Scenic Highway, the Gateway to the East Valley. Never-the-less Stubblefield's has the right to process any Development under the current City Full-Standards covering their east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20± acre property. The General Plan/FEIR designation is Residential Suburban (RS) 4.5 DU's per gross area HERBAGE OF THE MOUNTADIS AND VA Y REGAN 891950 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFHCE t0%2196.ARROWHEAD SPR20M.SW tERHARDEiO.CAIJFORNIA 92905 RESIDENCE MAR ;3295 RROADMOOR WMVARD,SAN IERNARDDiO,CAILORNIA 92909,(719)tea-0153 WW A OARMA V.HOMG FA Y GO AN n Page 2 and this represents a Stubblefield density of up to 90 DU's. The Stubblefield property, including the contiguous land exchange received from Caltrans total 20± acres. The April 4, 1994 Report includes the City Full-Standards I outlined to the Planning Director and Planning Commission on February 8, 1994. You and Fire Marshall Guy Burdick attended that meeting and gave testimony. The Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and construction cost estimates therein confirm that there are Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard(s) Routes for east/west Rt. 330 Primary/Secondary access. Thee City Full-Standards negate the East/West Rt 330/City Creek Canyon sub- standard emergency access procedure liability under the proposed Stubblefield Sub- Standard Variances and 25-99=124 year Sub-Standard Development Agreement recommended by the Planning Director. To keep you fully apprised and as committed to you on April 4, 1994, Aaron and I will call your office to ascertain a time to meet with you and Fire Marshal Guy Burdick for review. The Constructive Solution is simply a City-Full Standard Width and Height Multi-Plate underpass north connector to east/west Rt. 330 City Full-Standard frontage roads. As you know from the 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Public Road May 24, 1993 Planning/City re-confirmation, City Full-Standard(s)Multi-Plate Primary/Secondary Emergency Access is not a new phenomenon. This multi-plate construction procedure is also acceptable to Caltrans. This is ratified by the fact that Caltrans recently completed the new east/west Rt. 330 narrow 10 foot minimum width multi-plate equestrian tunnel to the south. We respect your professionalism and efforts to be flexible to unusual City circumstances. We are professionals also and realize that City sub-standards have helped result in 38% Welfare and 17% unemployment. This greatly curtails the City economic ability to afford needed Health and Safety. San Bernardino deserves City Full-Standards Streets ... Too. Thank you, GfG��a�urXl��4� Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Guy Burdick,Fire Marshall Paul Allaire,Fire Inspector HEMAGE OFT MOUMA AND VALLEY BEGAN W 1850 ({5 OHEADQUARTERS:IOSr OFFICE BO%21",ARROmHEAD 9HUNG5,S EERNARDUiO,CALOORMA 929 R ENCE MABSNG:5195 BROADMOM BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDDIO,GVII+OMIIA 12909,r119)88"155 A WAM'EB V.XODCDON FMMY 4l"ARIlIATB • WARNER W. HODGDON HEART RAE RANCH,ARROWHEAD SPRINGS POST OmCE BOX 2116 SAN BERNARDINO.CALIFORNIA 92106 (711)$41.1547 TELECOM (711)996-9962 April 19, 1994 Fire Marshall Guy Burdick City of San Bernardino 200 East Third Street San Bernardino, California 92410 RE: April 4, 1994 Report City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements East/west Rt. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police,Fire,Emergency,Recreation Trails (Walking,Jogging,Bicycle,Equestrian) Stubblefield 25-99 Year Sub-Standard Development Agreement,and April 4. 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) for: Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s) Dear Fire Marshall Burdick: Thank you for meeting with Aaron and me on Friday, April 15, 1994 regarding the above and our applicable February 20, 1994 and April 5, 1994 letters to Chief Will Wright. I reconfirmed my sincere concern for City Full-Standard(s) with no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. As Chief Wright was out of town when we met, Aaron and I are available at his earliest convenience to briefly review the April 4, 1994 Report confirming Public Health and Safety documentation with him. The Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimates(s) depict that there are Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s) for the East/West Rt. 330 Primary/Secondary Frontage Roads. (For Reference; See attached April 4, 1994 Front Cover and limited Map(s)Schematic Engineering Plan(s)photologs) The Planning Public Notice confirmed the Stubblefield property to be 19.17 acres and the July 3, 1989 Updated city General Plan land use RS 4.5 DU's per acre. This equates to a total of 86.265 ± DU's. According to Planning's July 14, 1992 letter to Stubblefield, the Rt. 330 Sub- Standard unpaved minimum 10 foot width Equestrian Tunnel (Pipe Arch Culvert) was built to Fire Department width and height specifications. I know this is not true and gratified that Fire did not write such a letter. The Equestrian Tunnel east entry is located at the end of the 1300± foot long east Rt. 330 Cul-de-Sac. The Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property to the north is then severed by the 1300 ± foot long Cul-de-Sac road. When we met, the April 4, 1994 Report provided you had by Velo Binding error omitted the first section covering the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement east/west Rt. 330 Stubblefield Sub-Standard Recommendation(s) to the Mayor and Common Council on April 4, 1994. Aaron exchanged the prior Report provided you with one of complete context at your office on April 18, 1994. HERITAGE OF THE MOUNTAINS AND VAI2EY BEGAN IN 1950 T OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 2116,ARROWHEAD SFR .SAN BERNARDRiO,CALDORMA 92106 RESIDENCE MAILING:5295 BROADMOOR BOUIEVARD,BAN BERNARDINO.CAl2FORNIA 924M,(711)9950155 s A WARNER V.HOGApH 1--MiIIIAIE Page 2 According to the April 4, 1994 Planning Department Staff Report for the Stubblefield Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment, the key points included. Ouote: 19.30.200(6), A tentative map may be exempted from providing two standard means of access, if the Fire Chief. Planning_Director and City Engineer find that • There is no feasible alternative to providing two standard access routes As you know, we outlined the Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s) for the Stubblefield east Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property to the Planning Director and Planning Commission on February 8, 1994. The Planning Department had not investigated the east/west Rt. 330 Sub-Standard Frontage Roads to City Full-Standards liability cost and as Directed by the Mayor and Common Council on March 22, 1993 for the City/Caltrans/Stubblefield 50 year Special Development Agreement. Therefore. I understand that my February 8 1994 outline was given subsequent to Chief Wright's February 1 1994 Interoffice Memorandum: Ouote: "Based on the information available, there does not seem to be a Feasible way to provide a standard secondary access". In addition, the April 4, 1994 Planning Department Staff Report represents that the 25-99 (124 year) Stubblefield Development Agreement is based on the adoption of City Special Sub- Standard City Development Code Amendment No. 93-05 and the use of a (Rt. 330) Pipe Arch Culvert as an emergency access route and Equestrian Trail. This 10 foot minimum width sub- standard Pipe Arch Culvert is located at the end of a 1300 foot long east Rt. 330 Cul-de-Sac leading to Stubblefield 20 acre property. As you can ascertain from the Caltrans Rt. 330 AS-BUILT PLANS found in our April 4, 1994 Report, the existing Equestrian Trail Pipe Arch Culvert underpass referred to by Planning is an unpaved Equestrian/Recreation underpass with a 10 foot minimum width only to provide emergency vehicle access. This Sub-Standard emergency access is at the end of Planning's recommended 32 foot curb to curb paved road width for the 1300 foot long east Rt. 330 Cul- De-Sac. Constructing the east/west Rt. 330 Connector to provide Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Routes, via a Multi-Plate Underpass (24 foot minimum or more) to the north is in accordance with April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimates therefore. This will honestly fulfill Planning's represented objectives in their Staff Report, "to provide the generaI health. safety and welfare of the Citizens of the City" (Police • Fire • Emergency Recreation Trails). A City Full-Standard width Multi-Plate Underpass is not unusual or a mystery to the Department of Planning, Building Safety and Code Enforcement, City Fire or the Engineering Department. On June 4 and 16, 1992 Aaron and I outlined the dedicated January 22, 1986 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area primary/secondary access with City Full Standard 28 foot multi-plate underpass (pipe arch culvert) serving RSA Secret Hollow Ranch (Woodland Heights) to City Planning, Fire and the City Engineer. City Planning, Fire and City Engineering preferred the January 22, 1986 Dedicated 60 foot R/W with 40 foot curb to curb paved Dedicated Sterling Avenue Primary Access and north therefrom the two Different Feasible paved City Full- HER1rAGE O l MOWTAD95 AND VALLEY BEGAN M 1850 OHEADQUARTERS:1QSY O CE 80R 2146,ARROWHEAD 59RMG5,SAN BERNARDMO.CALDORNIA f2406 RESIDENCE MMMG:5295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDMO,CAl2RDRNSA 92409,1714)98 - 153 ♦V4RHER V.HOIXAON 9M16Y GROUT 4411141E • Page 3 Standard 24 foot Primary/Secondary Access road(s) separated by one access having a City Full- Standard Multi-Plate Underpass (24 foot minimum). The City Foothill Recreation Trails(s) alignment was also recognized. There was no concern by the City, City Planning, City Fire and City Engineering as to how much the Cijy Full-Standard width and height multi-plate underpass (Pipe Arch Culvert) would cost RSA for Public Health and Safety. In addition, RSA volunteered to share $400 thousand of the 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area primary/secondary access Improvement/Maintenance District cost. The Dedicated January 22, 1986 City Full-Standard Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Public Roads and access was then re-evaluated, re-confirmed, established and approved by the City DERC, Planning Commission, Mayor and Council by May 24, 1993, with Improvement/Maintenance District(s), the effective date of the State Office of Planning and Research being July 3, 1993. Aaron and I then met with you and Fire Inspector Paul Allaire to assure that we handled the Secondary Access Gate(s) to Fire required specifications; i.e.: automatic gates with manual provision and back-side entry KNOX LOCKS. City Pre-Mediated Sub-Standard Emergency Access Procedure Liability: To be frank, I cannot understand the City and Stubblefield spending the years described trying to perfect east Rt. 330 Sub-Standard access when Two Different City Full-Standard(s) Development Code Route(s) are feasible. The exposure to the City for the pre-meditated sub- standard emergency access procedure liability alone is not worth it to the City or Stubblefield; i.e., Stop Rt. 330 Freeway traffic at a point of high degree bank super and 7% ± grade, cut the Rt. 330 non-access six foot chain link fence down, pull up the post and then drive emergency vehicles down a 1200 foot unpaved 7% ± grade road. And in the Back-Up alternative expose the City even more to another pre-meditated sub-standard emergency access procedure liability of a minimum 10 foot wide unpaved equestrian multi-plate tunnel at the end of the 1300 foot± long 32 foot wide east Rt. 330 Road Cul-De-Sac. Thank you and Chief Wright for your time and consideration. Please call us if Chief Wright is available to meet for review or further clarification. We believe, San Bernardino Deserves City Full-Standard Access Street(s) ... Too. Sincerely, ir�/• cJ Warner Warner W. Hodgdon CC: Fire Chief Will Wright Paul Allaire,Fire Inspector Mayor and Common Council Roger Hardgrave,City Engineer Imes F. Penman Shauna Clark,City Administrator AI Boughey,Director of Planning,Building Services and Code Enforcement HERBAGE OF THE MOUNTAMS AND VALLEY BEGAN M 1950 �$ OHEADQUARTERS:MVr OFHCE BOX 11M.ARROWHEAD SHtMGS.SAN BERNARDMO,CAILORMA 91106 [�7 RESIDENCE AfAIt.MG:519$BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDMO,CAILORNIA 91N1,()11)B9SUISl A VAR.a V.HOM.N FA my GROUP A9flI n dw oo Ln ° o Wd F ono o O I oM Con C cn CA >" z wUO� � ' F U uw � ON 'w w �. as vi �W cn y, v m Zd V � M r7 Sri, 'n < I y i • �'. (.3 0S. U V El E 0 El Qa W) © iA . Fez tot R �0. d F�■) t J� 16 z ►aa MV"[vzai sag Ho 9 / t I ►a VJ C m C"� ww� L C S 7 loos Z \ 6-�-6 .mss�, 7�awo an�' w°°a°.ue ._f wU CJ .q wFp w .• G rT, Gc� y g7Z,: av i 9.w WAR �iz .9 m NN-Li Ily \\ On I �pQ61w 1\ tn lz 4 03 T 1 c 40 � d � w � \ •'11 /\ i'z \\\ V t VJ N Ci�1 •�I (� �/ G��G R \\� w • E o — ^4 C m =0 0 saa: m t c C • � w � z sw - e a adz �r w a , W• U O 0.t • � W ' m W .y • F'�I e Mrrilll � ' oz 4 — O � a 9 ENO ` z • E W Z Q� O ENO � A W � � U � � � � w � E� A • � a as W � x Ao A —m fr g �.■.{ r31 A�a» S a a EFcmmm EO 1 V y E i wppm a W y l d 1�1 fiNi EE - w 8N �) rr � n co ME r Uri N Ch 7'C. 2a P}f$@ $q E G- z3,a )a�zt I'L o +a m W N oMLM y E v M OAR N oco N � E _ HE cow J. 'aY i F✓•I I1� � , fir °�. .57, urYE _�. m- 9n Nvm^E�,Ery 'tio o °a°`� ..}3ac o ._vE cm rW S"m v E .�° m ro W EV Hi N t . ¢ 1R�3 w mu.ft E 3 `n gg `� H! M g '� ' ' •f1A1 tip' 00 JC e 01" I .enli IU I ? Alt! all i t a ! 1 _ g :e: J Z � ;IAAAi IAiI A nij: 1 i ii i 3s u' ! g I Ae •'Y I � � 3.EIF p-F a �Riiill IId 111111 i 1 � �� li i , I I III 111 ! 411M w l000�0 Y 0 000 ! ° \111 ° 31 F4 '':F51 1 t = E: iii�lli b 4 .r'1 6s •lr rl i ili V/ ? [ 3 �s5�"Y_G.$ i N i cs lii�°f [ , • e 1,�y iljl�i Mil., R !g illg i,IP tlglil 9 � 1 c �E_ Alm /� !3 3 eI €tiE ` el♦ :1 :• el : 1�.1 Vii:,,R�l.g �/ t� I y .;G•+; g ` 1 z 1 A!' `' ! 1�1! i 3 R iii I11 j' Ril�il�+ilRllli111R11i11 W; E liln:rlin I, IR �' li I I I h'Iilll'14 e �+: a l :} � '/ C1 /4 2 1 � , III•'11111131 ( OW 1 I r .�� A 1 °�♦ � fIR � s! i i1 d111pIlIDl�iuilllga'3'I s, 7i Wz 8 � _' A ' � Ian C ; Ilgw lil tJl 't ri< ! a t i1 i , ; I I ! dLIi1511113 IId3,ill,rrJ }� € V I f s QO i� �113� 1 i ;• y/ i ' e Ili le� � dill lilill ,ii I �� �1 LC J 1 " u is 4 1 sS _ V)II 1118 11 R- i R' w< i (71 {Y eA;i i,i ce i) I I RRt+ ,VIII ,, �I !� 30 ilRgsl �Ijlr1 1i11�°° A.e e., z< z< I t t ! _• ! grY l ' fill •t`_ III `: „i Al 1 1 +g ES1 i lBE.it Iili t 1 R, 1 ) tI is E ':d°siil li?1111 �i.�lii c O N � N • • A W m •,°; NCO H eon, d q `° a cl g61cc' a Aa+ E z W t6 'C d «°D p aA uc u � cc u � d a O U A a o uN o « fix oQ u 3 °° UN ° C a ° N V A A b ° � L° « cu > O WW L y L R -1 ' z o� u � c c u2w � h cn cW � � Za 6,,oa o c ca C ww o 'c- bDd H c > cua F r 1 Q m Urr 7 j O dd OaA dN Ci ° W FPM q L U o onr n c c v� o a,, a Q. m c u � ° a •,/ FF-�i + Q [�r " UCc d cove c ° u �Cc O n « E c y h doEU a° 0 - 5t E- u ti . « E0 ,05 Er-),? o Z cca U U > WU ca dr en c 1�1 Aa dcu ` 'E AEa A ` « d o W V�' 52 „ acc a, ace cc a W c a � R Ldc ? FFa 3 FFv, a L « c u GL V] V] Pa fn S K a § 0 1 E fII | § k _ , , ! z \ \ _ ; § k » | ! a eJ \ k ( � R/ � z § � ( 9 00 �fL R / � Lw0o , � ! � = • E�= : � ; fo *q R| G . � k gyg / R § z { ( {g/» 2/ ) � ` } + ; 2yG ws • a 72 ; ` / ; ) \ � \ Gya �9R \ ! \/ . l2w | ) § 2 r k § \ \ § $ Q� (LL ( � ` h / q � ®� � ° / h/w § Irz ! ! 'lm4 � . ; li `o Ali p I F1,11 y � 952�_�pg Biz 3�8 �. �•� _ ,� � " a � � .� 2$' C 3.� d 6 pp�pp 9• E � g �o �`.3 a .. 0$� � ` p pp aC �AAn 8���.�p� 15 . <1 a gE5 ¢ $' S ti C3 Iva SK U � 'c Fa� EEa� �GBB� F�H � �9� • • � �$e �E� �.��s U eg 1Q} ��jj Oa F C Fa z e L i< U1 jSjJJ [b13 pS � ym x m x � E o <3 n KKee i ° g u' xzo3 �� Ali � � m- A O3YE'p .9 �•a 90 O� y< x o o B tl g n$ aEd ' ` ! f | \ • ` « «! ! } . lu , '800 k a f! /} [ § • WO \ { w , (! fZ ;lZ0 ! k � e . ® E ` () ! £ { . o : ! ,_ ! 0 > r / k ` _ ' | i0 \! [= ra { 0 k\}\ ` ® ! / ! § { r— r ® ! " ! . § § ® | ! )| !� § ( 0. &)_ !k / _ k !=| : ® \ \ \ / \ $ " \ _ - § !0. 00 f| / \ | e ) \�§i § ƒ ! ƒ o ; ! o ■ . ! - ` § i ( \ ° 2 " ; § 2 | [ § ) f { ) �■ ! \ \/ R k k k \ \ \ k§ ) ;- - w , ){k ) E S \} ! t: ! k > a - : .2 - - ) f ! i §�) } o � ` 2 $ \ ))CO t �_� � k� \ �) 22 M. / / . ) / )\ � � � o } } k�) k! ]! / 0 0E 0 fDa , rte E | I ; | ! ! ! r f § \ c � \) /\ § \ -6\ ot \ � / ( § - ! : 2! !) } ` ` 2 c f ° ! :2 '5 ; ! § \ _LI:\{/ ( D k | f` . < i kE} § . 2 . , � . �, ' !§ _ ! , 1 YIpI O " G✓ Y I Uq U 1 ✓ UF oT Mp U gp%. ~ 09 LO L N4 y 0'N V T9009 L0 O I1 Y pYMw Ptl 4yi IM •G G •j I dMC ✓4,NN OA9 bMSMP ✓p Qd y� c •�•� •yam td eu p q � 1 4Aq MdN � N4N .AI✓ O4 yW +� 'I 0.✓ y 0.'4 d ,� S „✓j A N M 0 F y. 'J O ✓ E ✓ L « 4 M C N f'Q m 0. I by4 AC✓ .n LL9 NryiY�N NF L P 1 fi y d w 0 x V w F'y+l .•� �0 G M C y I Pw� Yob i✓ U ✓ 4a O✓ 9U bytj A O S I 4q✓ dY ✓✓ O F✓ N4T MG m S W U Y C 1 M C U V U O 'd N "1 G q✓ d U 0 G FF ,AT M✓ A gY.igC .�✓ z O G i U i dU0 u M aFw m,ylwfiA V'u o R a i N q u A V"Iw 9 d o M q b0 ✓ W M 1 V > Nx' OxY Ml Lww ✓ 0 Y' O i yY O P YOp 0'u A0' 4 'V FU R� M Y N I p✓ OUV >,06 AGMYM Eq 0.FF p Y q4' O 1 W GPP 0.A tl. 4A pA GURNV .04 0~ Y 'I I A+t Y 9 Ypp N M r1 N r 1 q'•1 O V 9 A 9 O 0.o A F A y Y M > y UFY •0.G 4G S•n U' U' C Y M 0 Y✓ 6•A� V e C Y O Mp tl W > F O Kw L A z l Y4Ny4 W6L N✓ d OP00U yy am�F U' Y 4 .V1 I gaL•q .V4 x gtiytl gAMy FA edti N N 1 S�✓ O L'� Y AUL✓e g06"NIC 4~i �^^ .4q✓ Y ✓Lq FHYY m ✓M 06xA U VS . ✓ q✓ Oo FYVYF o YYM YYlI •• Mw q Y L0 w xM0 b 0 0 N 4w M4 N ox0 OAU 0 4w YOC j yy' W •• 001 i » Yq o Fwd 0 4W9A0. 44F I q U C YM O Fm v C Oa 0 W Ya o m Yb d0 pY qH Vp ✓ G R A R V' uo V T A 6 N U 9 C 9 9M dQFY A d Y W GO Y C 4 G O U V iw Yu 4 9 P AN OV > W V V cR A d ✓ ✓ A piq U S T W✓ 9 R M M ✓ ❑ A 4SU 4 Y =CY 0 NG4 Y C � oo> p 4e YY 4✓ N pGM PP Ym OU y q" p gN U3w_ C1� O MA ✓ pO 0 '. F Yry I fLq q 1j R O PdMN ry GU „ CO U' O O Q A I O F A •N Sp U M %AM W 4 S •i✓ d A a N0.6 0.p K & § (\ § / \ ) 0u 2 \ ƒ I U) / 2 | 7 \; / . � _ c z i § G � � uZ3 > . ` | m z \ LU e R /t/ \ a — | tI ; C33 /9/ ( m § // e's ~ �� ) EE /aa : � z IFi �, � . \ ACC 6// ) �� Z § / CLo Cya -E!F Z g/ ¥ � � ® / ut § §� \/ ± l ( � `- § § § \\ § / ƒ [ ®§} / / {! )Q, ��|r �■l §� 2 R m ){� �dm]r` l\ kk 2gWig� �'$b Ew9 ! ! ! | z ! §! § Q[ | Z O Q H-111 4 p U p LL E w S's � 9� y$ = � a9 <$ s s�" i ypE p N EU Q Q Zak ,5 •p,y � 95 0 p0�p ay °E f C Eh �,C 'y LU Z V LL X78 �, ? z?:, 5 cE E g <°' 0 0 0 O U o a s go .5 4 0 o S B -a o gp�• 5 a as E rya S p e�p d q$ 'rn7 OY BOO g 6 22 q C sZ lq,E i5 SI a Xp•X5 a R' b ZG R< . E EE o 'I y 5 O t o s a ZO � 3Es z � 3 � E p[ c�g 'CC elf gg�� o 9 2 ' V E ^.9 E ZO 8y O yyu�` jj pppy d y yg$ � 9'� S gg 5 JI ZO —� Eo d E q � g5 E3o � d6a A o E •gan 56 €p€ a M ° 58 SS e � 8 z oZ �e r� 53 3S' � baba �08� e g gb XX LCC • • � S s � — r .n � �� �C � vai — r E • A O , wi a� m a C � E F � • f yb S Yy G Q' C F�1 3 • FBI � � � a,. t `�' 4.. > � a y c a ^nV YFi�/ 5x" +H tCC G l^ • wev. kl •c W I .S t � }I � a V • U • E� W M � y� U � w � 09 u` a • W MH � V � � w • • 1. z a IN F A � M 0� tn� u a V .0 4as7 h N M a = C C Q Q C ti 7 L C h � " �w O O " " " �w M'� w W, o o o0 en •o M 3 F, w �•�`• O M A G O � 1 a EW �/ • o = aN �' =o xw 14 _ a eay ^ W M y M Cq �4 x !� V av aw a a sW H WW WiL � v� UQ w� III - I V I VIII III , I ► i.I I���II - Lou��e4lt';�o;�' { ��• r•/�I i�elf►�.a INIILLLQ/T//bY �\ Il •�{ri by••1 eke Y:A J 1\.S3c�_ �r • r.1 IIO _ F t G1LZ�� `. .II/IILIIIIII� • II '' / / III4� I � � - ���p0+4r11111� IILYS.aW 1■■111\I-� �' �- �����..�p4n1o• _ - le . �.�••;.YAqule4;� C:C•viY•.nn=. ��r ►11 :•a.�1 - ���"�i1���Gi11111��1„111 �� nlll lO � 0ii/1111� _ S i5 p�•!C.�r r.11 ��N'� I LnNi'��iS+.,-1��/� �►���r, .. CIF, - - nN^C? '� ��t'.. �'�SFr• ` � Ir��`�`'�� �/,'pi's � � p - • _ ��ti.� ■I � © �� E a� �t�E€lIIIIIIIIIIInum su "7nal Awl F �111111N11� A All o � lie fir . OK /d a O Z M pt 4 a CA 0 0 y Z V u u w o � 4z H 3 � 0 s U w M I W U ,� F � cn a goo a 1 � lul If iQ, IF !® h� "� : / it I kill •j. //// , � VJ ,Yi V O �•,i1 �., / R�' � � ' it � � f' �( p �6 mow•<�� -, b�' i �� Ll �i \1 M± 1 Ut CIO I 1 J ' Ca � Ma I"'►r{ '\ I . � ; ,.', r t+ ;t �- 1. /! %1,' � r�/ w if Tr AM I "�rN PG ` Va zo u \\ U \Y U> a � Z U � p T y W W z r, 0 h � owo a ,� o ��t CRS < W e a a" \ V a CZ OF w � .Ana m''•,�� 3� \ � `/ ��� �a Egg f W C � rr O h 9I \ U U O py 1 � o 3 a " Z a A s �� W � GGGiii G�F • V] F y G F U xC4 w > U o � � •_ O w w � t « c « y E w co Eve co c Z r, W e = uoM o c a w O cq EN f, eq qw o > a rU � N UW v w R. " W ° U 9 WW N � W A 5w 3a d' '00 .0. w E U E ENO Gq a E u zZ is - c vE o uE Q ` � w y w Q •3 pp� u � d °CU c � v° flR O G o cl ,��^> E � d .0 Via, a Eo > C4 7 u u u a C Z a end « aA w o oA � a o MU C� 0/ cb d — U a y ._ a w U Z en dM W z J d o6nE y � C4 u •fl � w r, .4 CO d E , d O i� w cn W w W a .E.rA E u =- uF CV w en MM AF = en _ `nA a E a eq M 4 u a m a a 64U L y y rLGG OQ' , ' a =a U A 0�, Z w� .� �� r m • � �z � � A z w M W W' Q., C7 • ' < . vii' tai ��\ �., c p., p a Q.� ,,e. • c W O � Doo W uWaE I • �aa� I�I +' p I�JI� I.r � � O • 060 ��q ✓ q9Y �OV �✓ 0� btlb m '" °�'y as �ayry5p�a � P�yy> M 0 MM.I yGGGGGG .p{�gL N Nq g+i O H N,9 a � Amq$ �°o. paC U 0 . 15�� Ytl qg ✓p q9 O 'E.y °8 0 1y TA.{AO 4ud O 9✓ Mgp OyyY.F1 U M Mpg{ ,Rl P 3I.MMi a VVU ^I a ' �+✓L 7i � q�p0 .y�W .� ptlptl ^q my 0tl 'Oy�, MgQa ✓OqP A � A'u+�tlp u � Y C)L fad by^�y�q +IG tlQtlnY ytNOU GC Lyw ° aN,,yyA 4� AYay.Ei Ui PS9 g ° N�A p n D9 M C dN 9¢'� tlPm gd.i� .. .�✓O o^ 0�✓M y°+ tl08 W yN 4M {�N V� ]✓M yO000NBMS Y ✓ a66 OH-0 ° � a igOM 9C�py�ry w � wa p�y ppp@ ✓� n1� yCV � xyyy 0. lit �p�H.fp�Y�17 �A i� m�.✓i3S5p "o d "u.�b ° 's� m m0 � ,�yiy p inp am� G � y�.�°0 9p0 Mom ✓pw � °OC �y Fo GW T OGQ �Sep P yM gLg�yyy udy o q $'m 9 m:WuR9q M ym.�1U qOe a i°p ° OaGpm aP'y�uNeAi um� AWuA M< �N✓49�UH iN Ssm00����u� N �W .1Im oo ° m 5 o s 8 Yy m N q T 809 �s.5 Asa Pa ✓ m z $ a uq� a '� � ggq9� mm✓✓✓gm aMeO MMMp a 8 0 WOm .� 0 p5�� H ~0YYYM� OA q O�L U0�T OMy ��� Y � •�•�i� $° 8�✓ q.9Npi�y� �a �' �A °a � k.. y 9g A g �w •�A � m oy G Ja Q° qm Oq�� no0 �0t O q Li�o y � 8 Y m SSeN A�y @^� g.qTpI W !� ✓ y.Y n �Y9� C � P a ¢ y y p gp i � o $$ ..{{ ® q�q� Iv,t � r W2r � 0❑�b.r� r19 9 .1 „.i�L( y� MyGSM 22 Oa pq y9Cm1, WO tmPn��� Fm� FT � 0500 aCgp�9D� ��m� 1�� �M�O� q� CR�R U✓C� d URO G�� Mi�i � w� m ii 6 SS yY b6 0 o m S OU+1wN W U T p Y1 10 h 0 O b� n 0yg°1 �9 �g�gg fL 0 J � o ,o • i„ ... � t. � � �® I� � � t ° is �^'r ® � r y• I 4 9d QD • �� T� a�.°�ie �• � �.Ti�� .bi N� q°o�~ 9 4 ° 'OPOmN N U P O •� w O �n NP pd IiP xYJM Ny ONM 6a OOU > m� N PI.1 UN L✓ • $uAN °qA "5 �gw '� uG op "v p°'c� '�5 �, o '^Yye1 N 5 5O N ° 0 F m i yppSmS dMq qpY � q. V�r014 ''UV V �y `p Cyyq qq . ,y ° q0✓U pNx9 yiy9 Y � C' qOq pCxY {oHoa{ 0m Y Yyok YO YpN .iAw �9yyY 5q 4 IXg u 5S 0 U 0 dC wppa0q gOUO 0iD00C8p p�q � M 9 > y5yp Ay L yYQ 8 ti� 0U •Vp�a�w gC�gO a tl U y � C Z y 6YSc yyyp vo ry ° Odd °Upq V 0+V01 '0 � QoU �O g �Y o 98in "d5°" a 5�d u ;°°yN N; �� a" �u� haw °O� 40w c AD mE jig ° s�ti Pawl •�� Y °� 6608s pOUA < 4 O M � WWNN pp yy�O pM SO &V5C� '%,005 T; Nynd NYyy OUZy 4 °Yia ww O'OSM U "�Y� ��.� �C�°u� ° �° °O2 p 5 5ye�y5 �a 55 n4 Two 0 OYpAN NCA A WC 0 g0 Nq OM 0 a wPa ✓� ° ° B V5 xYq i�4�45 a aoO�GNCJ N � Y UUU mp0 d "'�^ tlM ON �ONaN�� F UY KVYN"Y U~ g w q Y Oqy R- YU pt @e Kq N L L� C'4C NT myypapaa [a+."pim'o &a°SC"qqyyyy �4i��i os� qx Ay > tpd�� oa N •. 00YO� pT0 � F1� 9 � qq✓✓ O Y a q UUUV q Na yyyN Yq i A.G Lrmi❑J M 45Sx p F5•-•NM U N .. Y °rl C m L' N N C CC �p y 1� y Dg 5 °9 ti NUY U M .IU OgYtlgA N OV �MF � YAi Y �C• gg p �• Cy1 y q 5 5 q 8p d Yyyy 00 U ry 8 N �M - Uv YyJJgdff 03G3yyyMU d'yy$ Y tlrTiA •yy° " 'SQ pyv OppY0 q Y �tyy a U ONG 111pgq'q 4Y CYYNtlM "Y p tlL � m Oq✓ yd N spOnoV O m aSS� NYY ��yM~ Y .9 gg qq Cy y ym AYp Oq w ..Oi OA 0 O Om ,OyW Y 9✓NgYyS0 0G L O OLO ow F '0 > 4 o VA ✓ r1 y L•�p '•� qM ° m1M L M wY TO Y ° 0 $�n55 Y u U ovoy -Y a ° °i cY ✓ Y ,� p° o` ..tix by gjY OY 5 � 0 YM Y N5G °Y•y A 9nLY m � OLC ���••• yAgY�pO 09 0 °ral g0 � CA 5 g 5 a9Y Y0�G > NPVU Y� Y' 8 O > AC MO g tl 0 WY 0y .. pp A✓ N m" Y N S p,ZH 9 � SCUD Y Nr S °B° 5 ' 9 ✓y 5 ° yI ' ll , Yp0 +1 � Y � G Y Y OY U ✓ > C °F Nn yV ✓ MO � ydq t� 60Q .4 A WDgg 5 y U rpi O tlY"F� NN.p • iG Gy � aVx Eqq M^'1 90 tl N g 5 0M pp pA�yy p.Di.i SONNY OUq GMG yee � m a.OiO Cqy 6G y q G aV� SO O�gp ..>j ■Y NELL SO✓C GU~i m pCga 9Yw � 9�.Yi •'� pR. om5 � � g E�Rg pp i --1M ; E� y g9 u�9mwm 9r �ga Y S yLyq A q gCC pLpqq YC SU N yyq M>y YOU NM y Nqq yyyyyyNf p Y n,/y� S�1jU 'Q 0 y��p ACCdYO pYy 0.� AU ✓q 4d=OYyp ym 9 yN S =d= p m� .0 0 W NU99 [d3Vti ONY 41Y NLW ygyA6S� yE N W.Oia UY✓ I� 9 4m' UCC �.. � G�_ Z O1 OuV CCgqC qyyG✓gw�FxauuO Q« qV5 yY+"i agPNp C .o Nd Y E La 'IO Rv 017 Yz 'pY Yp�' Y pi'••'�y✓�"� A ✓j � qU x > OM S ~ N O ~yy 'aC ✓ d oFdp OWC a yN °5 a pn5✓ Y d6 ,"jwNy°Lp• y^ pA N � 0 Od rl � Y N4 N � HYl '\ MO xy�y✓ Td x 0 Cp° YVpC m ✓ a N �{'. 0 ••1 a i 4;; NV NO ° dOYM gY� mA .y mYSm°-' MP ✓ YT ,g 4Y g d4 a U U°ym S° NOG9 9 Y U MG'J GGM Y N F ° ✓p 0 yUN Mx Np.3 U qqq'N My 0 Y yg6 myM ry pOupN Z V a > O A M� d'°„Y� m+1 3GMm �+m VM.�Ly yA .4yPN Fy Y Y Y tl 0� N Y •� pS$' 'O p Y mq UC�"a Y G Y yyy p Y qY O 0 N& �[p� % a tlno YNOmyO {J �N xt Gtl Y MAwG 0 ..1 a9G■ Y MYm 11 to qY�O OOM mN IF+ Y 0. M A m O✓ Y ° Z9054 M09A5 L M UO"iSMUto Sx c m � ✓ o � m$ ~ m b9 N W M, m.°i NN�M,II p 0' y S Gu U V 0� gygy S m ZdiM � ° ✓ m•i ho °a u S ° o o pu TV CO Ytl0 PCY Y AYYC b0 Y Vd w0 CM9 V9 3.8 BAY BUS gg5 CPd °� �Y "A5 58 °w � 0 AO CUtl uVG .. GUN 2 ALN Uu �.°iY U � NU mu CU wd 9 l� a4 ud m o✓w a � y d u ° a 9 M U V d A,., tl u - a a � 11p ° .. q✓ ✓m 63G q .. fifty dm a 'Jv Rm a> �A >y ,N dV ha G Yq Yy UN oy Y T U NNV 9ya MN°L..1 N° d q6 PT2 Lyry . G PpYx p .• PV N Om� 90y LLyqy ,w Egg(y. G.� YU U ptln C ° M'Od �` T MO Y° 4NU ` HN Gx ; � C90 U A b O U �j .a tl 9 U G ✓q GPti 4 m>y. N d.M pp q M G m ✓ � ° M ..°i 9•.IL Sy N q•tl ✓ �U MG MW PY9 °Nm PYa N 'J T 0a0t T . . yw0 MY' U yC.,� !ryG¢!�a� yeGeb O+tig� d � 0. dyV yy`o���8p 3' �Nh•yGwLLU N wq M aYpWP a MNTy gGM��pA�✓ 0 d ypuyV>.Yw l�O y0i� UV a m�LyI1 w Pa FY y p... w U+q�✓YT0. ^tlV G>ICC O d V. O V a > a Y 0 O t o. N ✓TR 0 1 m ^ � 0 a F�( UU N 0 O. ' Cq d 0✓ q SOM Y0 ° ° A Yw U 1 H0 C 0yy G YYM Y dM u 'J ✓ Nm CpN y® TY tl0Uq 'JYL OI• d '� aa 'VJ GdN✓q C A4 y � G iL q. uN0 I < y A P y p N M 9 ✓ 4 l P 4aa.0 ✓utlY 0 AAA Y� �ppHV7�a aa - 4u�g ano. yc .9M teyuw 0010, Sy° 5me a5 3g .m ✓ up ' y0 pG•"C 0uA Ym^m Wp O✓< 0 ~ Y✓ G M �Ya yC~.P ° p U ° U. AI o CS pm tipp yO VV My yM d4 ' OCU GN m Mw T'^ ym ■M mYPY ° YO 09m: yy Cy tlCY d V •. .>iti dgG 0 u U p 0 V .. Oq"� 0 G O A A y d q N m;•`;�Y YNPP+M M mqqN 0<Owtiq A YP V ✓qV YUU 4Y✓GOP+ ✓PYY 0 M y A0'GW�✓u N ■0NyO N P oO > ✓! N 0V 0O ° M.Y1 t tl N d YAN Y6m Yr1Ya < P 0 u � aa a o v a a w d>N GM �� � � �� T ` }J�j1(jy/f� f � ra r�„q !i £ ��i e a j ,,. �; at r .d ,� � ��'� 1 1 � `�� � �' � � `b' � r `� .. � � '�,��, '� � � -v��, � , � a , .� 7�'� t h t� � �� �r �� 6 r `1 s w� {{I • Y+�j �i�. �N+i s �� � Ny 2' a Irfe ��� �0� � e �` A f ��t 111 ��. e n Y w ��; ,� � 0 s 4 � A,5 '� r � f� � � "� � �"�t k +�' o ^,. 1 � ' a a `tr , ��, � 1 ���" e �"v � �„ � w �r;a o � ; t � � �� s '� � � �l � ,�, .�S E G fi ..44� 4 o k. q ' r i r � r s i fsTA � � � s y I. U" f �'. sa ' �� � �� a,W i 1 � �g c t � � � �� �j o � r �t �, III'q t '` . .l I p� � 1+ � �Z � 1 � �' � '� ° � � ; rQ � �a��, M— r` � t � v � a� it�,�' R"' �k e � s, �. J � �' �„� a o � i., t✓ "9$��e� t . � � � �' {t a ❑ i +`' � � �} �l _ .9 j 1 �� � £ �+� �S� 5�` 9 7 1 :C J� � b .� � � ��^ �� f W G21 l 5 M-#4 iP � Y,y Len l � yy 1�� 1 X�e7 rj u ���,: i �t ��A<,_, a� k f 1 �W?� r m p .r� .� m �� .s � r �1 $e,l�� ��� r L s4 e x t ii;�� �� '� ��B t �° t, � e� 4 � � � � ��� � y � � � ` < ' � � , L � , �. r r � 1 �"�'��t 1 t�' � ' :�,q, r TAP �. � a: �� a3 1 1N1�'� �}�yt, ,� ��� t �� tt. � 1{�{�ii�44 $ j. stn G C � t A l u`JY a om �b t Ak 0 go 1;O ft' x � Ir G a f �9 a e � \ )� \�f �§ < < wty«« . gj e ! �! . f ! ! )� )}) }!: . k\/ =UA e + a • • N P T� • � u N � r+N O v j K x 1 L • :J v n� - U 9 ' on eMn c • 3Mfisy:sx s `ri � m y T d � d yCO li ILiY' Q 4 e. m �s Sri == 9 y� m 3 z s, • i Nq T r�4 G � >C �O A � L00� uu t,d Ut0 9 a� 4.n ? d� L"� yr9 4 ,2 yn 1�. F ru 25 r y i E EE � W ,n a� �L J.. __ \\ Mm ® }/ • • M� �r2 y � �1 AF v yHl � .» is •" V•o m it • x 14)1 •. i F a�"i� • � h/ V Vn•e $ � �L41�. � ^l G1 °� �1w �� � ,4i1 � ��• � yy s Ey a �'�3 r� b• �f� 9 V � v 1 yy i i a 11 . iaw 4 ! w :s J 4 k �Y 1�•,♦. Y� 4 'fib:• �'. � V �p.� M �a • ^' EE e yr{i1 r a t� � i X44 �,"��ar 'a �� �►o a p '4 � >• Iy, rt � f Iy � µ� 5 t Nit �! a r zw u S t F t y � Y } z 1 E � A v i az z�s ' ti &u. e— x r �0. � • r'r.� �'G.� t C d > v G • Y N, C R � d� y, C � mB . �9 �Or S' G w_iWw. C G 9 a� o� �U 4 w b ,ro a 0 ti x, S IM t i w^ i L ron a v 1 ti l 9 i a 4a �, `x U v Y 1 � �f �iwF�z 4 aah Pt iA6°.. N TMa � p y •�, kY Y A �ts i , +/ b ly �1 E n t .P w a Ne v c F � z d W CCQ aS p � � OA c d � x AoU F h OZ 9 a y W arc ayo � > .7 — Rc Y w' v d h+� 0 r � a � Its F 5 U ❑ = d ' d �-1 h U z _° r U ° a U Isl U '= a —m W 9a k a Lo E-4 AZ a a h C4 0 .0 .0 O cn c ��//�� Q d' •c 9 U c =� v a F W Z c � 'o c •o $ ti A A O � p W C4 U C4 v�U`o V a R gg g8H �,q;; a§ y�5� spa g�s5 K � 3IF �'�p4� IS 3 as 3 4u= sg tiP. 85 si8 �8e s_° W `°u"+>r, 95 c 55 „ °g agtu e5 'e>", 35E S. I ' SE ib},�ff may XS.+cc a4,� 'yQ§,S"ea`E ES g- °� e'xx55asag1S x q •= xa$s; _. rs;ti: 7, W ` •�� yq.. ¢F E>' O eic."35Q�cst r n5 gF nc°s'u'"_ x� s5_s°�3 tSx3gsaefg3It?g<„ ■c� m. 9uY�gY , -'E oc8a°xm 5s°5 e9.`4' -'c .`Y'£u is % % X % % K % K % ¢ F Y % K % E O 9 3� s' s a z y LL a u € e a x 8 � u z S 3' z7 a d� S 8 3 u ,E 4 & 3 d S 8 e i ! i , S < +7 6 HIS, � 4 Y I Ei3 ��s y I1 --tea ' y At Tp R J s- . ! ! � � \ { ! !| # � § § . � � ■ § N � � / � � \\ �l . . ,,.■ !. ; . | { ME :137A27PN Ii 25 O 0 Y ip 1.1 T !� Q �C (• $R�6 1:. f�•I�i:�b•• y P qi g ry �� v,rpnl� E •� X555 B SE ° � GG y DIli n v gg iIC3pV O .p LL s C CC M � q €c q >® y 089 E! � 3 q•$�22 �9 x �g�gN n .i A Ne � 00 � � � '� � 5 o "I "I � u• e A00d�S �Q. a< 3<��8 " � .: N � : n � � � p y Y a o. E q u UU V.a0 8 S E $ E ' i E 3= 9 `0 3 95 �`g °•� 'S E z ao IS 0 5 °pi E.^`. F� U S SP E� aEGcU � o � . < Z n fY C N wn. CM O°� SSW EpC A ♦i/V �Cy ryJry C {m{CC a,OCpT r8 Oa pp 1 V °U x =.g >uaS.L3_ E °.1,. i• V rt/ W W f7i P: Y !. � N .2 G Gq.y' � � � < 91\11 JJ V • Al FJ f♦ ��. - 4 9 ;rV t fi d F r o ♦g. 'Jn7 'i��1 r Ni e ; ■ - , , , � } - / �| `k§ ) , � | %09§ \ . . k■©■ ! {. | � §� | 1 | § \ j k q: |w$ _ e / ■ \ | �k = X22 2 P | XS / ! | @ 1222 o� | / N =rr k I o §§ k © # \ _ lit \} \ ! | « ; \� ! # \ | ! . | }\ � | ti ImYO � q � M OM s � nl . YGB Ya Y gSSS Y udeoG Lu '� «✓yy p pC MAYMy � ,`9a O@ 3- F Y Y Ytl W 60CYC PYY Y a T qA A- bpd G q q✓ P q .M � Up OY�LY Y9e9 YM Y UP SO O^ '0'9'1 gTmV iM N • Y 'YYW Pg C4 YA P W I V' C+p1Ap yPWy '�Y n a C .yi�yl d G 9 9 U O' ✓ W _ AY p 9 +1 P S VYOUCSpGs ✓ AO U✓ pOCY r Z ~ q' OS �@y iYCCT mY V C 1 yy M � .Wj � m y.l.H a✓✓ A a 01 �.. P G n UU OUaeX GWONS wA� Iq A 3 y� a a A4 q 'pA LBpW OO yYm y Ww /y tl tl Y O•OYM V N6Ya y C ` O.YI Q A O Y d iN0 .3ql d e' M UM «G� NL (x L n PfUI Y VFW Th aAa .-d, of X «U O P V 4 Y N nd O 0 W )•� O S o Y d M y Y 0 i, MAO•V••. O M A ; ✓ 3 y„ q m d •M d 4 4 q A d C a '0 «y'k C U G � •• 30 M0! A dAg O N Y 4 ' W w O A. C Uy Y >"IL aM Y NL tlC TL q g M �m Yj .mi •O CSC 8i' qP PPr41 LW, 'YrvU ^ � j•+ P w 9Nrvq iA 0 r.9L1 •u' U > 0V iPY 4W U .1 JS Q iL .P- H F' •Upf• Ca '1 yWU N.IC m0 > 0 K N [ A lY •• A O Sw N� SAOG •� ry C LP q Y• �V N U 0 tl N [y 1111 ii�1 V I q P C •rl U ,q U' 0 ri d r N d U E TML A: a�IGYM Y>, Y ✓ N 43 O n •• d✓ •Cl % q ✓ C 0✓ q Yw M m C U `l •� 0 ry E Lrv0 LL UYV A q NY \t\"pJ 4Aj T ti MiEOC m A M✓ MP •.110 TYU' Y UC q 4+ Y M M Y qq ri GG M d U 2>:aN N D Oaw 30+1 4'13 UM SEa a0 EN V U � a ... --------- -- - ------- ----- - - - -- cy i 1 V z��' �y[I{♦ 1 ca W W I --- I •may � �E , 1 � "e �. OA YI AY�A. PI. MM�Cgo ~ pi✓Y nA [� �� Sw M~�N•' MiUyP � O p,GY Y ct Cw YY0 )M8M0A aC � 000 k�'�Vt4 "• 7 b 0 Q 4-1 M LL^, G oie .1 4 H b � S p, ti g GO Y oOUti OU ° � m H U d N O \ k ✓ O O Y 0, O A✓ Y 0 O y G ° L y WWW Y Y Y N N M M q q N H V gLYd Ui G dCAYgS .°i ..tlu L V W Y Y X Y N y y N U Y H t N Y p YL i Y Y LH.iNpY ,O 'I wyLWUL •JM OP H ~ H &A O' °TNY J0 A 'hYYNU 4P komAm KOM L 5 CrAL MOy°yp ^IpVOM pX y•� ❑'J .NqM YF )N ON N d°� y dH Y y LV m'J Y> n ✓O MeMF dP L UN m YL0 A W 5 g 0 G V ° Y P09Y" 0 LZvu c ZOOG. C N qOG � fFY V . Y C Y > q H.Ai u d N GAOGPpda. ° yR U NN 4 L 4l F S A 0 L.Hi 6ti✓;. > 1 ON 'JT ¢~..GjO C� yYOd p' LqH 0- 0 GPY CEO b tl C M > Y O F ..VgCY PY bL PaYA w U .� i.d •IN ° GN U YdVGUY ) V W .. N�• A q N.i Y M pl M✓ ) y N N P Y N N .i'O Y i Y p K 4 .'Y 0 w00✓ OMg, LYH+�, k 00 OYb% Uk4 > F� ) ) �9 0. Y i y Y'VIY ) 0 O •H G 6 M� O wV OY N Mp °O yY � YP � Gq�909 tlY 33a .�SZ y y�:1 W n C%0.O%O as pyy u Ty yt�M q 0 .~m�i�Frv✓Y GO�'O tl C y qgY A C�C pp gNM0.1.0.Y1 0 1 0 q P. a—M V H M ° 'ny M0 Ogy -0 00 I Np�n 06y U` N4E p>{I. A N 0.0. LY )H q„✓�Y 60w •°�'Oti9 ° A'� 1 0. U 0 ✓.15 u y.l qY NGyti ) NA{j O SY Y Oy MO�.N °•0 ° yy �9 1 ;.Yy„ Y o:0- oQQ0 rye 0 LY FO� O 000b0Wv.. .✓VY 0 0 O n . MO >�CP "'� UQ~QAMgqqq✓ gw C°yNCCV non ZCe % �4 MQ Oo � OOC y�ey Yamw Y>M Y � y OM Op OG U0q v�P A O . °0 q G M H 0YHp po N q .M0 CHG✓ H U. C pn P My% 0 q0 N$ YYwAY Mw 0H6d .1 wGI.yY.I✓OYY0d0Y U 0NO .Ui MY ° OL q - 0 _•. {Fn]%0 A p 09. w . Oq U HU ~ \E G V 00 h �. G O d {{ �•l qY � q ✓y y p rt. Q W .} ry OOw N M 4 NY 9 °yOC V O IVY C.i� gpY1� OMM nl J O (� C F•, D . ry t 00 2 S w N tLY PV ) tititiq N YN O dY Og 00 HY N Y > R K N '! d ° dN.-1 q Y 0q Om t 0 Y b O 0 p 9A 1 U 8 Y HYOG q MO'O d 00 AY % Y%G. O CL HOY0A + 9 Oka. Y ' 0Y O wH0n% .G 1 H U fA Fi Z i Q al F P C F > `� d w n o J$ o Om• d '��y � m q ¢i F O n n N J � O gta� �cm a3g� m m d 3 c m � v . ZS�onN _ 8cm5 a .o E a 0 C f1 ?_ _ anU p gi da m a = C 0 $ _ (0 _h wig c o •• $3 E � S aN a gc - cc a gm_'H c n g0 o 0 0 U °LL an$'m d w wm m o r m E c f `° �ry3 d E } 5'E • y. II n m E > an d E G OU C fi $ Aa W -a Q NUmE3 J r Oz N 41 Omi t woo. p�C$ d LL N 6 N O r F S p Q O m F P (4 O $ N a OI N & m p 9 H2 O O W E Cy v o�C V E m x g$ Q > O ZC O L C E d 6 W N O d d J d m H O3 mm t3 E A m$qq � dUOdCb hW m '_E 3; k� CO IEO C 6 o $ N O'm 6 d td INS, N C C_ IL N N° a dr c"W ry `a K r°d W n o W W g'E $ n € E c 0 q (n O m c_ag? `o ON3 a pE�_ �qp t m._n wr fA `� E •' � t 9 � �v92� y N 02•j.QZ : U'm01.9n UO� of 3 d c c d c o m W c n m$.O$ °o, E E 3 m70 m20E og �V a'n£ "gam L �0 3: � m3w c m* ab m. .MoU p M a m .9 Ew fi 5�5 33 E oI R L S E c- pp '� Iz Q N m U �s ��9 �p n � � ,�-� W U � A•% d V o ww $ `� m We q� Z5 gggO W Br fi m c E - pp C T W n � ° mvtm gEE8am m �U� .°E'�'9mm ° CSmE o ° £ '2fi n'- d fiEmE a� m3 c; TL $8 °d '$my.E g w _ w W m 2a Safi $ 7pnn ' EtL$ @.- g£�'o w m LL f^ QL .Ns.Hm .- A Q O e N ° a 5{ _ E o c eJ n m Bifi m QF i.�vmaE @gcd .g,"mgg� Fm >9 ip m ul (9 ro_ m n r mnw nn JEd�Fn'Q5 $ z O °z EE im mnO1fimoE £5 E.C � � mnm 0 3 P Q C Q � ijr s brc Occrn go M-E �Cd "u ¢ F• `Z C(�SC (ip t� O w u5 0. m LL e p 4 O 7 d w E E n�c W $ E O q� g a O 28cva am .9 E' afiHI $O C W • � TaS[ � @m 0 3G q•^x TT .Ca « ymUv xs S 5n 'gyp • j O Y �C U �C P n4� N Q c OI C am@ Fa-a d O =a n m c d n aj m O m O N Q � Eu°`�aO1 _ Eo` dma _ oc ai0 op Q$°r3 mp�QEd�= m �� � 2 O C 2`m ` m N i fy R wo 'U j m m C m l E� m 31 Z S N m L C pC� N Cg pp T r R Q E 8 a O> p> o>�C d'C gig (p m .� q @ dm ALQ � 0Y �.00 V6 2 w m d C d N a v ;G m C red d « ¢ y N O C 'm N O j o Cy p N� m O N x p➢Y N r N pp(� m O m a aU U C C 3l UO a C m y C m 75° , p c D?UmE m - vmm n.n Bi m� cN c d IV az CmD.L 6d dma.ym > LL 1 N C O v 2 L 8 3 =5 C7 E cm a 3 o a cm _ c n c o s Z o d a m ~ in i m s n pc 3 OZ= � Ti @ 3 t = c a o 0 3 0 ° c y C « r L C 08 Tmm 2 d L_ � E oaJ2oq°�� 3L _ �n M o gC_g��p ; p O ✓I q 4 C C 5 d m 0 3 m 0 2 N � mm cd pZam"s E �' O cE T try' .4 O OR 6"'9 d V d C T — OI C a O O -� 3g 0.4 Q°;c` sm 'gym n `u E N y c m 4 ° K c c E > E vS? cv,2b dp >m ' m o m m m m N 'm v m p p L m N d d S L a L W N �s a • C 0.V < N V C d rWE B " Y% L y o n 3 e O. oe�O� ey %..y •+mi M •fOi �V V GWp OY O E V W r - ¢ L OOy � WO V CY ,F�yM G .W" W � i VYi V� Y •Ww L =v • < � L' y Y 9 C y 9 V i 6 •Vn V \ O = P b Y V m < V 0 AT y9✓ ><i TT 9 • i yr 9 L C. " w N L _.� Y Vu V pLp yL q ¢y1 i W u L N L N V V W L O q Cq S Y y, 2 0 o N i a ��11�_-�� .� ape Lymm 4 {, � -i •� > yV u Y � •iN Y y nY e 6 e E aL O C W W N 7 Y O Ay0NNU y �� Kp .00 00 0 A Y Q SUM uCOO y y bao� m"£ 0 up m m y .UCUO RU2X .,IAN G y N U U ••�� '0 •j U Yw b m W Vyu❑ROC m0.i A 3 Y O O Tyu 'O ypo r N o d w N Nu pN'1CN� .i mmu a C1Y - C � NV NpLU TGpO u d u G > C y nml G A w Cw p �0, CyYm ua NU o _ OI�_I"Iqq puuT GY pM :Y� y AYUNy A y w q>' m8— p ' N �////\mi�lf £ A w qg Y em p o r1" • ry Yo N wgp GI y N� u , U V O Y y ./^ -• S O 1 O Y y.Ti O U 2'N❑ O W 'O U aC T U 'utl Nm Y uri NO A YMF 4 L m !t 2 \.111gNW W m Nq O Vp °4 >� � C< M NIIA y ESL y £ yUyyp Ay '� 4 Mm4 Y +mlG yqqO LMMO Uy N p1 w p .yqa < < ` T � C A AYYmuE C C Uu W l - W A LA m uAWy AmO MO .N +I U V fu's � YW ¢ u £ £WN ❑ 4S YN imS U N CU k V Wu nu_ • r ,' t x'!!1.1 , .., v ////17 �,I/� �/•�•":i "�:1:vy fit'.♦ ilia k MIN NOJ �/ �� ? ,�wf.�ivd rye i�� • •� ' Q� i •z; a• o II /,\ zs EIRA � s Y L.AOdWCAPE 4RIEAMER4 A4 11DRD ARV ER MY FOR R4(EM.M MDR7H SECTION-•M' i ,r '� � .rte+• 'i °s �"-- Q4- WERO.ONG AVENUE LANDSCAPE COMROD®R SECTION-reB' ,,, ... LEAST ODMM DAPVOW RDAD O,AHBWAPE VMAMEN7 SECTION-•CC' ' 19 G3 Ciryd.Ln ELONOIOCOEYELLOM O WEMA 6ENCY STERLIpNG AV ENUESAREA ENT 6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT^ . vrcEEeo ouanns .Al 11 rfT1Deptrrfr SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE/MITIGATION PLAN "-m`�=�="-..rte }� q. • r .deh'�''• /� � t r h '�.•. �-•'jrel�_ A`� / • e•g°ri°e a •) 1w . G�Y". L;•�`aN��,(9 n1Y i�rS •1°♦�"•0' iNg�•��f p .��•n T r,1, l SSSSSS i i`..�fl r°f 1✓',���L. ., _ II11 i a 0 a 00 gHa dE 1 O — � 4 — r "o Z 0 00 i A g g W e vw saavws I- Z Z W OMZW H U y=p U Sa LY � 1 ZN ~ �OZ aI"J z z u<r— jl m ¢=NCO cc 011. O ZZ I-.O . 0 LL LL1wa-w¢. .OLL O n a f- U) Z O N Z $ AI \\ Z Z Qa¢F-FW UA 6 (--Na wm :_ CL F mwoo O C zf W . _ N rte rW]iTn C. LL 8 e 011 e e _ � 4 5 i s a_ r;. a $x vii` �A ° i ii�i'deyp.eA�4y4�yA E�E�yyy�yyy# hh � vrs:nss C�Y,i�y 3�3gOg�Y yS��BGS� $6 Yi Y$�S E S yt' 15 .1 a d LCr R r ;:; ,Fla � .'• �`. • FUIWARNER W. HODGDON MART BAR RANQ1,ARROWHEAD SPRINGS POST OFFICE BOX 2116 SAN BERNARDMO.GAI WU 92b (214)$91-150 (714)294-9962 April 20, 1994 Ms. Shauna Clark City Administrator City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418-0001 RE: City Creek Canyon Scenic Highway April 4, 1994 Public Health and Safety Report City Special Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment City East/West Rt. 330 Sub-Standard Access Road(s), and Stubblefield 25-99(124)year Sub-Standard Development Agreement, for East Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property and access • April 4, 1994 City Council Planning Agenda Item(s)35 and 36 Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) Dear City Administrator Clark: Thank you for your constructive attitude given when briefly speaking with you • during the April 4, 1994 Council Planning Agenda meeting. I reconfirmed my sincere concern for Equal City Full-Standards) with no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. At that time I had just received and provided you with a copy of our Public Health and Safety April 4, 1994 Report For Discussion Purposes Only and titled: City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements East/West Rt. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police • Fire • Emergency • Recreation Trails Walking • Jogging • Bicycle • Equestrian Subsequently, I addressed the Council and submitted my letter(s), documentation, Report, Schematic Engineering Map(s), cost estimates and other data applicable to Planning Agenda Items 35 and 36; i.e.: Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Application(s) for: (1) Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment, (2) Sub-Standard Access Variance, and (3) 25-99 (124) year Development • Agreement. Attached hereto is the City Clerks office April 11, 1994 letter confirming my submittals for the Public Record. (See attached April 11, 1994 City Clerk's Office continuing letter Re:Warner Hodgdon submittals to the Public Record April 4, 1994) (For Convenience:See attached April 4, 1994 City Creek Scenic Highway Report RE:Partial Contents) • HERBAGE OF THE MOUNTAINS AND VA Y BEGAN M 1850 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 21".ARROSPHEAp SPRMGS,SAN BERNARDMO,CALffO 92 0 RESIDENCE MADSNG+3295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDMO,CAllFORNU 92101,(714)983O153 A mA.K m.N.IX N FAMLLY-0-AFFl11ATE a Page 2 In being given only limited time to overview the Schematic Engineering Plan(s), Cost Estimates and Illustrative Map(s) I also pointed out my valid concerns depicted thereon of the DOWNSTREAM HAZARDS. This was caused by Stubblefield unpermitted Massive Grading and Bulldozing over the Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property and removing therefrom thousands of Boulders, debris, tons of material, large trees and stumps by dumping them over the cliffs directly into the City Creek Streambed by June 1992. Pointed out was the fact that I had previously submitted to the Mayor and Common Council my concerns and Code Enforcement complaint of these DOWNSTREAM HAZARDS. This included the east/west Rt. 330 Sub-Standard City liability cost to City Full-Standards and related City/Caltrans/Stubblefield 50 year Development Agreement and Maintenance. This had been submitted by comment and by my written letter of complaint dated March 22, 1993 with back-up documentation and photologs, including, but not limited to, the July 15, 1991 Council Directive to the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement to process the City Initiated Amendment for 766% Density Increase covering Stubblefield 283 acres cast/west Rt. 330 property. Council then Directed the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement to process Environmental Review and to investigate the sub-standard east/west Rt. 330 Sub-Standard cost to City Full-Standards liability cost. Accordingly, I resubmitted my March 22, 1993 letter and documentation to the DERC on August 26, 1993 regarding Planning's process of the applicable Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Rt. 330 Sub-Standard Application(s). During my April 4, 1994 limited presentation you and stood near the podium to clarify your knowledge of the Stubblefield un-permitted activity. I appreciated your first voicing for the record that I had previously mentioned various related accumulative concerns to you several months previous.This included, but not limited to,the April 2, 1991 Stubblefield$11.5 Million Damages against the City with Sworn Testimony/Declaration as to Rt. 330 Fill Material Sale (Borrow Site Fill-Material for Mobil Home lots), removal of the Historic canal with the Stubblefield Massive Grading, Bulldozing Removal of large trees and stump(s) therefrom and dumped into the City Creek Streambed by June 1992 and subsequent Sterling Heights access mishandling by Planning . These Stubblefield un-permitted actions caused City Creek Downstream Hazards were all documented again by photolog in my City Creek Scenic Drive Enviroscape and Improvements April 4, 1994 Public Health and Safety Report. (See attached State Maps B and C Rt.330101d City Creek Road and 1884 tHstroic irrigation Canals 4(f)property) You further clarified that the next day after meeting with me that you requested the City Engineering Department to do an ON-SITE review of the Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property and now under their March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s). The Engineering Department immediately reported back to you that they could observe no evidence of ON-SITE Massive Grading, Bulldozing and removal of large trees and stumps on the Stubblefield property. My believing that your testimony honestly related what had been reported to you from others and the Engineering Department, I was not disturbed that it publicly conflicted with my prior representations to the Mayor and Common Council immediately before. I had already provided the Council my April 4, 1994 Report prior to and as part of my comments. As I personally pointed out to you thereafter and within the context of the Report, the April Wltff E OF THE M tttt7t d AND VAtIEr BEGAN W ra50 OHEADQUARTERS:POS'OFTifE BO%5316.ARROmHL3D SPRW(S.$AN BERNARDO30.CAIaORtQA 91166 RESIDENCE MAaJNG:3295 RROADMOOR WO ARD,SAN BERNAROQ30,CA160RPQA 921M,(711)111-003 WWW A VA0.NE0.V.XOML F.WRY__AFnLAiE Page 3 4, 1994 Report contained the On-the-Scene photolog(s) of the actual Stubblefield D-9 Bulldozer and Heavy Loader in the action of Massive Grading and Bulldozing large trees and stumps, etc. into the City Creek streambed by June 1992. Importantly, I described to you that I understood why the Engineering Department had reported back to you in early 1994 that they observed no un-permitted activity on the east Rt. 330 Stubblefield 20 acre property. The result of their conclusion was simple, there was nothing left to see by June 1992. Stubblefield had completed the un-permitted Massive Grading and Bulldozing of all terrace retaining walls, irrigation canals, boulders, debris, and Eucalyptus grove area large trees and stumps, etc.; thus having graded the entire 20 acre property to be like the carpet on the City Hall floor. It would be illogical to now fault the Engineering Department over two years later for not observing the Stubblefield Activity completed by June 1992. The un-permitted Stubblefield Massive Grading and bulldozing activity had been planned concurrently to coincide with the contiguous Rt. 330 Freeway construction by Caltrans/Contractor. Stubblefield then simultaneously Bulldozed everything OFF-SITE of their 20 acre property and dumped it over the cliffs into the City Creek Streambed 100± feet or more below. Two years of growth has further disguised this hidden unpermitted activity from ON-SITE view by the Department of Engineering. No one let alone the Engineering eering Department. would ever perceive of the concealed political boldness of this act. On Monday, April 11, 1994 I scheduled a meeting with the City Engineer and upon review provided him a copy of my April 4, 1994, City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements Report. I also conveyed my April 4, 1994 discussion with you regarding the Stubblefield un-permitted massive grading and the logical Engineering Department O N- SITE observations of the Stubblefield east Rt. 330 20 acre property. The City Engineer was completely unaware of and had never been informed of the Stubblefield prior east/west Rt. 330 un-permitted action(s) when I spoke to him on April 11, 1994 and had never seen the applicable Photolog(s) which included the Stubblefield caused serious City Creek DOWNSTREAM HAZARD. Accordingly, I further provided the City Engineer the extensive photolog(s) in color of the east/west Rt. 330 area submitted to the Mayor and Common Council on March 22, 1993 and directed to the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement at that time. These were then re-submitted by me to the DERC/Planning Department August 26, 1993 regarding the Stubblefield Rt. 330 march 26, 1993 application(s). The photolog covered, but not limited to, Stubblefield City Creek Canyon and Small Canyon development areas (A,B,C,D,E and F) under the July 15, 1991 City Attorney recommended Stubblefield Settlement Agreement and applicable City Initiated Amendments to the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR. I personally reviewed these important March 22 1993 documented issues with the Planning Staff and Director of Planning. Building Services and Code Enforcement following the March 26. 1993 Stubblefield Application(s). Enclosed for your purview is my March 22, 1993 letter of complaint, documentation and photolog submitted at that time to the Mayor and Common Council, Deputy City Attorney, City Attorney and City Clerk for the official City Record. This also covered, but not limited to, the July 15, 1991 Mayor and Council Meeting Directive to the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement for a City Initiated Amendment to the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR covering Stubblefield 283 acre 766% Density HERBAGE OF p MOD AM AND VM y BEGAN IN 13" {� OHEADQUARRRS:905F OFNQ BOX 11K,ARROWHEAD S9RD .SAN BERNA WO,CAILORNIA 91906 W RESIDENCE MANNG:1195 BROADMOOR WMVARD,SAN BERNAR W%CMJ OR 9190{,(114)!&1015] 1111���� • ♦m90.NER m_HOOGOON FAM6Y G0.01R ANIWi£ Page 4 Increase, including 480 High Density Apartments for the east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property. I made comment and re-submitted my March 22, 1993 letter of complaint, documentation and photolog to the DERC and Planning Staff on August 26, 1993 as part of Planning's process of the Stubblefield March 26, 1993 application(s). (See Enclosed March 22, 1993 Warner Hodgdon letters to Mayor/Common Council RE:Stubblefield tensity,RL 330 Sub-Standard access and Massive Grading City Creek) The July 15, 1991 and March 22, 1993 Council Directives given to the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement, Certified Minutes thereof and Stubblefield 766% Density Increase compilations are again found in my April 4, 1994 Report. The confirming Density Map of the proposed Settlement Agreement Areas (A,B,C,D,E and F) for Stubblefield, Highland Avenue Improvements, Borrow Site sale of Fill-Material to Rt. 330 Caltrans/Contractor, Development Fee Relief, Apartments and Mobil Home Lots, were given to me by the Deputy City Attorney on August 2, 1991. As you know, the Schematic Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) were prepared by W. J. McKeever Engineering who is also Stubblefield's Mountain Shadows Engineer. Like the Stubblefield's, I consider them honest, honorable and very capable. City Full-Standard with a Multi-Plate underpass is not unusual or a mystery to the Department of Planning Building Cervices and Code Enforcement City Fire or Engineering Department On June 4 and 16, 1992 Aaron and I outlined the dedicated January 22, 1986 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area primary/secondary access with City Full Standard 28 foot multi-plate underpass (pipe arch culvert) serving RSA Secret Hollow Ranch (Woodland Heights) to City Planning, Fire and the City Engineer. City Planning, Fire and City Engineering preferred the January 22, 1986 Dedicated 60 foot R/W with 40 foot curb to curb paved Dedicated Sterling Avenue Primary Access and north therefrom the two paved City Full-Standard 24 foot Primary/Secondary Access road(s) separated by one access having a multi-plate underpass (24 foot minimum). There was no concern by the City. City Planning. City Fire and Engineering Department as to how much the City Full-Standard width and height multi-plate underpass (Arch Pipe Culvert) would cost RSA for Public Health and Safety. In addition, RSA volunteered to share $400 thousand of the 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area City Full-Standard Primary/Secondary Public Road(s) Improvement/Maintenance District Cost. Aaron and I have worked ourselves to death trying to do things right. Not having the time to address everything at once, attached is my January 26, 1994 letter to you forwarding applicable deliverables to our prior meeting referenced on April 4, 1994. Thank you for your April 4, 1994 offer to be available to meet with Aaron and I to review these important City matters. San Bernardino Deserves City Full-Standard Street(s) ...Too. Respectfully, Warner W. Hodgdon W]UTAGE OF THE MOUWI AND VA Y BEGAN W 1838 HEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 3116,ARROWH&ID SPRBJGS.SAN BERNARDWO,GV.DORI9IA 92106 RESIDENCE MAILING:3195 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDWO,GU6O 92111,(711)883-0133 A.A.V.NOIX:DON __GAOII,MFp _ con Q W a o�°QO " >o >u I "' o Wd pn. 0 \\ WW o �� 3 I CW9 � OI � V ti � w �, ; .. Aw . :. h+■M F w 1� Nods s» s� ;/'1 a W Q Q W I\ �u- , e aoev e► r 0 I 1 / f�r , arry i�s 0.0 1 w // / . .• p� s I� ,� � � � �� gel■■'' �+ w � �� ■ l 01 aav tv MENA. q i P c 0.0 CIS l go V T •i L .' OFC y '" 7�. • �� S o� 1 1 y9 Y Y vG i .1 z �\ / { L� S 90 O maw ol •i� /ql II � f� � e c �•.j. wf l�: oo \� 1 T S U9� w � I W roc a s owq a E ^_ z A con �1 cc o a iIVM� KYXXYI� ?x ' � ;Q Fiy 7 • V � cc m ,�1 3 OW Ono ✓'`,. tea : _ � W • � W 0 � 9 C �e S .'7 c am e !y, E°o v c ^ r E d A rl O � � A � � Z W � � W � w S" �y ■ E s op 11 firs sr asm pto Ln 0 $a €�Su"�do ms's w�£ �: zqs o��a�� Eo L���g��sz s a U)V1 � ��$5j'o o ^ 7 \ N NSm M�imi CL O Es`S `o gsgag€Rs Z ry� �e y�gsw C E Ea�a��S EV F„j.� ■ � Y J{ 1 � C 1 A�- j tl„ o 'Cu la +* r a E E ^e p�+r tt r 3 3 S E q� 3 akh" x s'w O 3 Awn. t i x 4 ix W ? Li.I M WHO E If F+I k'nt ���iii ffit y .� O 3 Ez € ur CEO h1 cma w r n C c �5 pp r UJ }Y x SSS` E O o o ../ � ::J:.{ P f. r U � �° ro MM N .x g2� SIT N a E3 i1 0 ISE � r Y w n, 54 f d4mE w a rVnuS5 @ 9 Ev f2g.1215013 arts pisti can g.. £ My U ss Ap gg; `o 4 g A $°3 ; r ar ',.. 8 a P $ S lx3 ESE i 512- zg, �. E N �rn q E t� fic� ;O. v.!. 61.14 g a36 "AND E� 3 3 ry ? �. u. way ¢ $008. �� Qov �rc bE�'o grc} z @¢ 2 332c°yYEt.3S So q 0...6 . c VN YWa3 ~V�6N cz`o2 3 OS'x�rn � 3� �£v«�n � � � ::::: is 1 EIS, i I e t!{ I { s`•. 3' g ' � lilt N I � I r key OV fill i }}};i, fId F } un } { al ; i !} „ i } I `1i {I V °•yi I{ 1 { ?§'fit SI 14 � ® tl , �g9�e�g tsMRS � yo � : , - ! ..�N,' P II II . ll llr C ra ° �4•'S'� a o x F ' IfFfli ° 4 .r"•� Cr{ II:iE 'ii 2 s tee,Epl<`• w o ee K 1 l Iliyle i tiyi! O ! CF_ �r_ Hie it { ■ a Sl ..l� ♦ � � y a, �'k a 3pb29g�y tr ♦ .. 1� ' it �fsrT � F] � a e FS g L I �} �, ,; 0 \ � +!1EIai' i o t j �✓` F I � .p/ I ' 1 1 1 � � 8 iZ r i II {E vJl-e. 1�rl o lE {I4!::III II II IIIj{ hi b6 II II pI {Itl i l�}tlli Ililiilli'l 111 - '• rv; �� { + 1 i sI't }; {f !! { r - �€ I {IpSII•! }III ait sf Inu.lu a �' t EE � I II� III�I,eI II!FII II i i P�+� ow }.e r ��� F �.♦ ; �ej �_ e! `. ,.'llN IF{I{{{I'liill;lill!I' § �{ Ci< I i€ a a I a C 3 ,Ilt�i w l It I! py I i �y.0 iab i li I 7 I;I } ej � } 1!t!IiIIl16l4r1b i �, i sf ♦ .-, \ �. y ! r i � 'Il t11II1 II ! :!!il VI � it ♦!I. 11 4 j. q� i 9 {I r In � UI{ iii ii ,liillii i � e iC 1 I � 3 e QQQ .r �.. s 171 li.l a 1 CI xi i —` i Gdl r I _ 41 f, I� �' se• ' 1 €� � r ,! �`�� Iillil` 1 � aCil �� F } IfP�e I )li I !Ii � ,]. p jJ yl a .. Y• m ,jll {4. ... i F! '} Ei(I I'I 1 ! 7r II �IIIIIr;IS it it 5 +'+iE.t a $ N; o0 1 ;i LI ux y i I!t :: +III i:( !I{' + I, � IrIrEE 11EIFil! ill{�Ei Su `� ! *E Z-i I �; I� � • Es '.� � I�Irlll IIFIIe!!!V{� ;I II c�l ,ta{ItI I}I!;tll :EhiilB .� O N V1 F �c� F—i W W d yv> > en d Q Zt d h •cN y h b � � Wz 'C Ay Z >, yaC+ Zy A a o a z Qu t Awe Z ~ UO Q rz 0 u E O OA a� oaq ° `oo > C E OU � W .+ ..+ W •O b � W M t0 a a o d � x o � U " w Z w 10 V E Q y N N ay 7 " O > 'ON C VA A VC ° " t « `° u > rn Q Q z � u � W p vt'u) G o C R O V "" c= nuc"iocui eodh N wo Ln a dd WAI � � c UA c 3 A � en^ v� d " U y U o V ' � U � wino E ' ` ' emu r. ; 3 E r- C aU z CE0/ - CE W C- PC u C EU co _ q >, WU R t yM �, •C .. M.y v AA U Na E ° cCaE .s ° Wk w A � � a q � .°. W W a+ w w a W ° IT .0 9 ? FFa 3 FFv� a n u W En o ° •£ a : ! § 0 E , 2 ) } < cc } ! ! � . ` § k S.2 LC mx \ LJJ § w 0 }\/ ( \ ) \ | . !z cc z 200 SZL 555 /�/\ ) S ez2 //\ oz 2 ) ; k /� | CL 2 e | § § § . � 2m ! � ( § �#/ § \\ � | \~ .��` k -j J | � �| � � § � ! !y ! �� ! ! | /a §lM � ! | [ U. 0 ® b�"s ! ! ° ° § h99 § /\ / r ) } `;§ Hill 0 U ➢ LU i A $ yy o tl S o8 g= 8 ,,.5 S . a $ oy5i$gE-ft pg2^17 Q 5 A ippp8a�� 6 � � p ➢ € a �a � g ul ➢ R„p w 35 ����S U �4 z _ ; 6 ibu� g 8y'S « 9m �pbasp � ysm 6 p y z z s ° att pO.� $ p m� 8. y g G5 56 8 g 6 c m > cap m 3 Em Wo °c t � um°n --- o U m m n m O ° c y c a 2 d 9 v m t g ai o c D y° °n w in °nu n umi ~ �_° ogto °o n m oumc - EAnam w Z m E v C d E Y m w ¢ a ac' m QE pZ- mn Emad - E m 0 W m t a u w a w v D ° « aWia p LL c m p o o rn c o rn E n o E o a i wE \ E as Uc °u n5 < rn« nod p v a _ rn a m « EO 10d3L Eat «o Z LL o m Q y Ey nd y m = one `o ° u m d a n i o q u a >d N W '� m u > o m m m 2 H ii Q w D `¢ W C yZ'Y O ; Ld uWio m m Q V Om- o O L O V 9 c U ; J m « ° O a W C m u E ° am c ° _ c O W N C D0 ° « ` u a; f0 N p a N J O U O m m « o' O m v W O p O r > T m O g m N d O a N m pW C �'+ m3Yna N Q QNmFaN QN 0O E H 6 J u O O > E N m m n O LL N a U L f) N m m N C6 U T C 0 _ N m T U m O w E- And nn E� m oa t Dm c m W _p '� m E c « m m .. mo u' n ° ° U m ° m u N o m m E y D ` Z o u «L, E'c m m L > - o m mm 2• m a ms Uv m U N .L. N u dL >c W E - C. O N o q a ` p o a a o n o m n m p J m N _ 0 LL m 6« C p O Nu ° w a n Wos c y W U y E N U F N U y a W u m m ° m E2.E - E m m a°' m m a N E " m m a o ; 1 .9 v D > n o € a J N W q N ; C m is a ° ; C m H H H • N H C O 6 U C m ° O O N Q mm Em E mo aEc " a p ° p ° u m e -° y c m p u y v rn m m u , U � ep° ma °U WDE J v' Ei a°y - 4 Z c a 3 n J ° w x o ° c°- ° m ^ m $ o c w N E o a a g u LL u y ¢ ; y m N h N n 6 W y a D c N 6 N O d J E m m N Q ¢ W N N Q 6 a J C o E 'm JyA ai of Uc E V � ✓ UC N„ go ON I T QQ q yA 0'• G 1 DPM C� PP ° .r9 L 0 y dq a0 ° 0 VNW 1 4y > low qG .L Y I Ply AN yyY yy go VW P O 1 $ L yLU p 9 w �' y0 ly ,°� S I OW y E°E O b ti L TL N M a M yE 0 U I M9V MAY glMy Ay 0 LM Ay4 ° •� Z m SNq nOY ° 4 G pM+tL n .LW 0. i EuV 1L0 4 m ~wO0 .biA P i M 0 N 1 Yw$ b,ti,� L ° GtlYwP CG 0 L ppy 1 4,OU L P tW� y Y °•w+� Oy WS L M 1 45C PEda > yq' ✓ A ~yY q,yq A ° 04 U yV d L• ..1p z ° GU ` ME4 aC.°rl i..YjwfiA °iY N M U ° 0 pj P a 1 NAd V q U W YyC•-dIWW q W�°• U T W U' OC i Y C M Y Y M 0•• 1 I I I OYi tl y 6 iA. VO p tl P O b A W 6O OQ 4 °b p 'ry r N y O po N 'AO L U tl y° •Jy q y°{GQ,•ti q M O Cyo O9 jP4 Y w V.4 d4, n 9A UCY N . 0v 000 U C f a 9 > F pO x F pA Z I My4y p4 wdu Pyd OP° 0 % qy 01 fWp� T � M V 1 °•Ltl bV A `9 Y LAy r' A dN U 4 ONb S 4 e qC Y Nq L^' S •n i >u"ylm bNp Nu.diG m OCya.0 P i au cN j I d.tf O > y 9M O A . , d I 4W q o Y 4 D AML ry P > U+a N M.1 I YaM Y 9.0 km gwLAw O KPN000 W >Lq 0 4V95 1 A C n n O 1 .Mm NL L' 1 qU L V O PN L pL 0 0 pa 0 � •Ajb MO b A'M Upp y 0. P tl y7 b .1 9y CL Y qE I° u A d W 0° S d L M O^I U C yw U � Y b A O q > W Uy qAy U p y L b Q w ii y tl) p Y 04A ds0 4 E i Q u L+t 1 S M! Um 4yM pM Pm pOp O C.1 59�y ' 4.q4 6q er'M Ca '. NYNI O•q Ay• 0 W.1 9 W TN O Y N O M Y OD•-biN l N Lu „ CO U O W L M tl r0•1 F A .1 S C U 4 •]Yb q N _ U 4 4N6.p CW G § § \/ 6 @ 7 - � . • ! !\ ® B ; ■ k 0 _ . ® _ � z -{5 � ! : ! /} } �z ; Elz .z ! � 1- k {9 ( /w § 00 zm � ) $ k ) / ® � z tom § 2g » § LLB ~ d\/ ) ; § D 22 ƒ ] ) $ - � k � y2 6/} ; C/ , ! q § ] ( ;!�! . § k § k / � © � HR ��l � = z , „ ! |:!! « ` ' , ! 2 § » j §S9$ /Swf6a ■ t || ]) | fG� § Eb B . Sa/ | ; � | , o � . WAH § \/2 �! ! i 4 Q[ | ] wo 44 Z O_ e g o3 U F O . e E 9`d as . o a pr o s LL $,� X05 vo a o ox F g€ ° U 21 Et ° � p � 5r b V 5 E s e e e LLI a e� 3FFpp$PE9 �� g.a s 'y ILL N o Q Z Ev ,S � S o$ pav CC° s - m 03 - g 5 > Z r2�a € E^ SEtis �vE LL pp. yy q 7 U v ZEs `w °saes< C�a . U 5 ° 5 Q o S 8 O 'EE N d 0 y P ; = 8 E Illl�iii a $ uu US X UE E w aU �• `d X vp� E 5a u 06 6 cg zo E - x 3 p' �j 95s C 'p9•. gyp! qy _ vyG x U gp S o z O >` §'9 § g 8 Z �^8 2 E O oyE Q H 8 a E 11 !3 9 u7 f O s•� � � y ,O D O gy�a1 .9 •n `� El E o - � > a O C e„5 S � � °� Z u � h ➢ • • � 8� S - r r, a ��^C � vbi - r F Q � � � w � � v, rd/ $ rf,� F+'y � , m ~ E w W E� C �+r v v • � r� UZ � , � xr I� O d" � � Oh-1 3 r� :., � u o. A � � ! t 2 4� � T > � � � � �� a���� �� �I I�'� � ��� �I � 5q0 a O �� o Y z a � � N ICI � � � � _ � � � '^ • U 6 'O vl rn f M�r� F+i a U ' „ A m � ,it � � � V 7 ������ r F-1 W V � �' �� � W � L. � � . ! e. �. a vl � v 9 J" �Yio 1 > ° n .. re � "�' c W U � � � _ _ 7 @ 5`,r � W G Ws � o � M 3 � a � �i,�<< u a LET\I �I TT �� 4y.� V S 1�1 � �W.y � �"q � t �/� p e m V1 � d • € ` a O � W � � W F� � Cj F�1 �` � W 7 a x as W C p w ° " W W W U •� vwi e� e•i F� w ad a d p a ono c c �a PW�1 C C C N 1 cc m "a7 0, "� r, d o U dl F eMn ca F $ 2 u� • U Av z E w x 1�1 E u eca W o a = ►-.� W Fil M a M C p v] .: o .:'eu U U c ' C4U C4Wa] v rw R c III � A Ili � Illi. d - III • _ A �IAI �IIq/ n • � • py1�I�. u �f v III ( t J � I r♦\ Imo . -^ �9Jr1 ='=fi • 11 °:l / u11u� ��ii r� C,.►ITV �rF�l��l�t'y,Q� � � �� 1! - �� - e Ian• .m �� 'i",7F� = O��C-.►•nom ��'�� : : POT SEEN i - .��♦�� -1 1.114�l,uij I -. IN .2 life 1111� - w �►'�i.�i A! 7\g11 n�. �. .ull iu G7�i%111 ra _► � © I' /� fie, �I Q���E� �1 • �.. � r��i��.'�t�s-G••':�,R �� `•i. Ea11-� 'rte'- - .�...� ,.�r�� - • •4 ter._,_ -� j Wz o wu ti U < 0 • A Q .� �� � Ye1j�M i H QE'iz a Wad } = s 0 cn �� W Qum � I VU uw M+I v� - I - till All � ,'fllll%7M) � �, Wag A ���, F omm W h k4, G � • ti /I It en 1J 11 / � z • I 1 Ind — ot MA o r. .. �� v�'�� '1r I ,`i ••�� Itstn ��';l�/!>r�l: ' l rf 'µ V V 'a O' p� � � O� 1, 1• � it U`�m€� x� s� rr gg 5r O ZU lz � hy7 chi 16 �� ot a Rfw " U p - s m az3 V W z zV � 0 W ow m � w z Q � O s Ota p ' o a of CZ waU s V �< � } § | § |2( § -t§§ § � k � 7 o 0 � 191 § § %|# d §B z ) r. 7§\ E \ ■ 2 � 2 . . V1 U � ° F ad C - ,. y •o u fi U xC4 ..• > U o •n � O W aF n vU a r E 4 FW m aCi aE `oU E v c W y E eM Ev, 7 en [� C W .2 p C 3 a U 3 ewe a C4 0 d o a u U C- a a c W � � p e o 3a c •_°o o a Q E S ._ y c y WU fl = N o°o m `y zz Q � Q y •y � .3 end a� Q u Utn a E � � � 6u Eo > O a' 9 d y '� > E. '� � ca 6 d � •yam _ �� � � y Q tiH d w d F V19A � (\ C T V7 . • M • UO � Sys .�'.+ .0 L .r N zW eq w w U N O C b y p a , i1 y M L zz r R d on rT l a+ a MCI 1� qz ° a - .° � G '" o� E a l iwi W � Q w ;T. .0 a ° en c vn � \30 C C a � �� � '� / •° �E LL Q ' p 1 W > N Aa Z4 It wz um W W \ �Wx . NL� ' • I �~ =v " • o � .a0 > ~ go ye _° le tz g a W �1 iiii' p �$ I I� I \\1• • � � n, O 4D s7 •• a O •• t 1 � y o y q o m o yq a$mpM� C pip.. w �N U rags 99d A�am M bq 00 w 0 Y N �pyp n1 y�9 yCg q�� g0nm ; &C hw hro9 � M ^p yd0 Gup y �ff�j hA YU Cy ° p roiA �Oyd� pyp] 0 I q 0 OmA Ila �0 .0 q�q 8o 3 0 ^ Y°Y+�9 y p @F,a e� pNp o ..s AwU � aF ro.1PA gyy dqq�ggi�,q�j r+ 0y . ^ O.VYm NL� w�OqQ HHa 3 hd � o y ���$�w SON �W am9 S� ��P$yN�je FC ~� y,9yw wq"� 9;o5� .°�aroa YN N u sA � Y � uH mw em or � m m$ ��,o � m wro• �' ro� m n°u "e .Za roc�awPmw p p�Y.40N�Mppy 9� y Y C � m y m a ES !GGygf} w Yapp...yq Ya u c 'J� S 5 > e A,MA ON 121.11 p {� 9 $ � yA �° 6aJ y � A .-IYNmptl9 °ib � �L?t yya 3. . iA x ri^g� �H ,w++a1l .iZy FnCp peY � 9 7 g 'J° a 9 ��yq GC 0s Uj�ympGj q {ilggpp�� h�Om 3AUA U4�gry ype UA atlV � �n N� • it a�9 ifl 9Y U_ r N IA Y N b n W P O r m 3 0 � r Y T q � G r �oo gp �8 � � 7 a•ffiyp6 �p �,� �a qqa� R F 3 < w u � S t7RC7 &o < .1 • � VV U � a' C Ell low .9e � � a;y L }F. � �`� li .�t 1 9 � ` • I t i• 9 ozf/ r•::' r • to (� . _��• :_ ®• � t ►�l � �� • Y a ppyy 99yy tltl pr�ryy{{ a ymy Ep.raj �� CO O� tlAY ��A Y�N� S J�ppti 5 ,sz d�NES gyz yyvu � ZPWG Y� EW y� O�. O NY6 pp.i 'y N� N Pn pC� eVp�7! yyyyd E�W MNdYM H UN• Z O¢N U n P'fi yr®�p f.i Bpp C y YW�U U ppp 5^A Opp�.m i M 'S EL0 gm IW V N qq0 j.H NjUA Ay Y>>l..�.a��p?p�p 0qq tli y u�°H Y y~LH qTqIC T�.q ii.8 y0 J 1 H.UE 0.i NN�U�V L'fU y U5•QJ•.bLy.d.��'1 p Y U 4.H A q. gG• 0�yp{.Za W ZY(G�'U�$�[NWYN�I .F�1j NB V M n4 uW YO°°i NiA>q yy tlEq5 tm NE 0 S 0 J VNNNNNN YY 0 Y�11C O P . YyygqU{Y���1�Y EoW Up M6 E L O°y qq✓�✓5�Y0 4A 0 U ~ N U0 0006 0 y✓° - N O 0 0 ka [ C CSN 1 ✓N G O° qg p N�LL�GyA�C M[w°� rv�UUUS V ..y�56^ii qtppaA f)�QQ�yAdN���C H,Uq C•y BX�S Ayy Y mae�H dddy M yyO Oyytl Um O O U y 0- E9Y y A y C UySpNp H">>...W 3.✓•>1. O kA Z Y O Y y��Fy�pa...OF 9000j Z°OQU 0.O[G�U nZ O oC .✓4 i5 i ILL y O f °;q mH YaCp"H M✓°Aq�ySGE .Y iqpHCCi l Y G 0 i y 0 Y -°E IN ;N~pG� HtlN��N~NDs+N�1 UUYroYr°iH0 H•,�m ANU✓■pO� TppVL dyy g.MU{A�Y V y M0!0�✓WMG EC LG HN � A z✓ AHA 0° Cp �✓ NNC WO ° y SHM ■�.q1 OMV Nti y, F UY J(V YN^Y UH H A`m ° 8 A d 0ny i-1 ri "'uI K.E NC H SCHC NT yy p- l§G TAN 4H NO p oSq y ryµ' p[.� Y AG Ay 1Y q N Fy0 O NpU {�1�Z KK� Q.QWI F WN GyN LU ✓qq qYq H09 Y , .. O WNOU 080.q0 .i �qqN 0 MtltlgUY !T1 l0 bG �N� 8Fn NLKF A FL•�0. U w ti c Y°H 5 5 .. UY Y Y H rvU5 U H NJHO HOUaT p N5Aqq p v tteG H0y C O ol 0�_o gg 0 MQ4q rg°i.°9 A i �U�p C 9M"�B5q m S°c 4'�H Y y yY°5 Y mo.p N 1 V 5 dy'o5 u✓O H S."6. q CH e yy CY Y�G 5yy BA NS s✓"ddqq�Y 0 q AY J.rvm'G E Ann✓,MWQA"'logo�Pe W w 03 ° fi L!C'Um•✓0O"N"d✓'m!?>o c✓8 Od{/yp°CNJ�am�HE�qd$V Y>diq GE'Y V Y E r ° OY O 1 0 W W 5 Y H U � m 0 uC'O A O O �i A r9 dBq 6 Y9t�Y. i Y 5 So V.0✓m H 5 5 p4 m AYp� p WSU Y✓ > AG ✓�O O a A ' 00 'w AO 12 k Y y 910 9✓ 1C C pp y■ O U Z yy�� tl tl 9q 4 ° F uq N U 4 5� 5 � �YT A ■ YGNL N O gG0 W ■gWUHmNI tl Y �_ z y pp y Y yyyNNq B y GG NN app! Q gg✓ggA H M H . �� 4C YM;..Oi�AbS OiqY / AMU �91C L� m95 ON ymd E m nY8 �yr1u E.G°N Y�CCNSV� �6� � �°O �n10 °�Bw dE 3y� C C0 H.H.IF 0 nav yAN y�VOOq� ACI aMXZQyNYUq � qa F > off F N .0 Y ✓ m °'� oc � N 5 B�5 Y tlHHw 5� o HY m ups 1'ppJQ 115 ✓ [yN {'JN� V L � {Hp� O CtlMi s rC pp9m °SOU,N AP VYN U G Nq '�IN JH U� 0.A Ay YY4�Jm y0.F•n Ntl MpeHVFYOuY✓yy y^ H ° 'ARYq Nd 33H 4 q_q 'W`.yN 0 Obi � Y MN 6I! FIL Q� Hd .JS WN�H�q�Y{1Y YEMYV�WQW 50 JV` C MYON mN U Y OG HY OH EO N UA r� O � U C'9Nd H.•mj MY ✓M0 VP UMH " A .N OOPN H L L Il✓ Y Y 'N MME&gyJU..°iN 50wWSmpc mr�cty"o•Epe� n.Yi H A m0 y 07ym ^p ✓ gqOLe I Ia� OYGmg11 " NFN UYHi Y.°i�.iH F LL 0 >�A S 4 9N . U �C M M Y p yq� mm H m0 0 qS owy�� X C w' H 0. 00 k Y YNj S Y MM >U Xy U Ys� S S Y N a p N pC W 0 N� 0 %80 yyGG 0 M O "j p Ygg N N N N N N N r1Y +IS4 ��l✓ SMM Y NLI� OH CY}¢��!pAq YY 0M SHyO AS. YC LYU SpN 0 fLYY O� {q�U G1U Y H YYY ✓ O q•�.. yyO � pYV� "IpY O✓yW C YY Ypy pqY A0 YN dY0 Um Y M m Y vb" 0 d ail a Mgt Y uq■ o"-I 5 01m R"YAb�H "w 2 N O W. E . U MO M qOV > M ° u " Nm> c✓� Y y LgqS H.1 HCC0N Y( NY0u Uy0 9 ti Ltl q■ Oa8W030uG 5>y G° aY�.H eu e� m N C ✓ umM�W�$$�S7qC ✓G 0 y 0{1I $0 N w U+9y 0 �> 0 gms A O N VHN OU ✓+ at OH G5 A �� . yyaU y 0 O 0 YYW �U N y {Y� pY UA U W U Y M " {H{ '+.✓ 0 y O t.. r"� N WY ypq� aY G >. N mm YCY WT� Om1Y ✓Yp G9G.y CYC "HL P� H d yHyN ✓ LN 0 NOttl Om CUii.�OO ¢� 'Y Np SCS^ 0 Mpp pupp AO ud tl N oeyoagN 9Nq YYUy� Ylmi S 1�N SY Y Hp H C■ ppY A .. Y " Sp Up Od^ YV� > SdY+YCi yaN 9YY.✓i YCO ° i q � SM �M❑ AV IM Ul y'm U•��[y�I Y■A WHNM 0 0 yY 0 O^S qq 0 MNC p`yN Y 4 w O ipGSY o.yp Yl 4 V •. YijS✓O VC12Y�YC Q Y 0 �c pgP A Y U p n~Y YM � 11�H Uj .. wO qipS"T�N N 0 'UO✓m q CCCy 0 YqSMq YNNy `• Y N POVII aOa RriH ■Mi^(1 YNU" N P ✓PY A��U ✓NY P iM M d P ✓Y N OHYH OH.�p ppyJO OOU�oG y Od O a OH�• •• N ••✓ V.W. YMNi SU MMY GN YGU' S d ✓ qN YdN YrIYN q Y5 � P M U O Y W b G '•I I+ Y r1 >rl 83 • is '1 y t t ; ; f 41 F 4 RI 3 • qqq � i 16i } m J a J � T it GZ • ���,t `� t v c ccl i tie e t. � � l'_, a4,d e°?" �;• ,fit. r g v1 a� t. } v, AA �o a ern IV �4St I 1 d b w p \ 41. , y ,#- 1, , i a m. a S io e r a �' tlii yw 0I �z vq z 10 M N a f CC in $ C S' I Xw M fj e kS m OR ` HAI YNT p t�Y r r � � E W V W w� i <• F • w"F �zxi. m xz �3-^z cm c •W'C r' oyE 411 u « U �9 �a °o U « a e �m 7 C�•E d rA v h ' i U TO a N P � i 7 50 c Ai lab �n v rn q P a� d� d= a; % d � w Q= ti 'C: E3 NO q.i 9 hall e c A » •ti n i % MIT"I '� �t�•"t. Y'.. t' h S 4 . afta` � 15.x Y. �kfj t .t b y•ti. � I fl�4i V QP L4 9 G w b- G `° ' F. `o J U > n +, a k- .ssd a E o` c E Y to . 1 , \4Y � 4F AL Q a �H Y S = 9g�r 2 S C ® 1� t"1 • • N T H T A Y 4a O d `� :: y u E«. i Q .,�Y,»:.az Q�C v W S" • �` i °Z` C v ...x:m4" t"� Y'v U t0 oa � 3 �� u a, C� �ti ��y �� � in:W rp§t ci•n, vi �..z.,;•.,, a.. ro� y.� �� 4 C :p'" p, a � �a C � v EwEe C � `0aa C� .�� a v dL A� m" + x:� o°., a. � �U A a 8 h i y .g ## a','txr: Titer 1 11114111 11 r k f p a [ y p 'j i ^n' %Y� 1y a u t r. x g t Co `i � Yl *g ✓�� �'� n }�'x' to •('o-1? S ' AFT ���°+� a I;All i s t A�• N�: J + Y r + 4b � J lie two y N �Y\ ¢.+ tW arse 44 fikx yr ' 9 t t �yry t eMt�, of t x � a MY" u 1R Y � Lti ° � m 4 �a � Lti r >� � A u �rF+ xl � r°�y�-•px yS� � � f 'O • ji' r tii kya�t,� Sup �rle � a - law! tX � i� X t 4p, ti O� C m N G h Q. t t S • Oil- YA } 66N Zan A� Oq 6 �• M� ti u O G �n L_T • b Y b • 14 C A oa 'o v • mu N` v " q }`r } a t s t a c '* r z }} ..� ��, ' � •.! �� � z, �v � gig. L � .Lt R: � iii J k Xt. *g }r b L z a d � 0 4 a / 1 b V L s v d 9 J ` 4 W y W Nca � W z 9 H WFi 000 x a ►,a c u e O w dR Qrd o.o U d W :Rcav cn a 9 b � 9d Wes h h Oz x w Ica tuE u c a � a v FW � 9 a R NSF r W y u U `� R w a - rn QQ o U c c paF Qj h dO a Len d Lon � a9 0 3 > > h `�' Ln � � Pa u a v8U`o V Q W 64 .r, m RC 8 E 32F �s3o° p§ pee � r5°a9�5 � � =d�m z�s2�5m�2jYa's 9 `5 Z5'se�i�a YOy47 VE 41 i °O�aV$6C ilEp�ec°+ ,_l - E l3cJyY,EVgES as EeE appa Essuutt&s;s5<>�j sgg63 S2 4�ea`O:yB$ ax�8�38� a5 W •my 6 a�>i5 65°� 35�e� 'a�J ��"as �ap i5° 8 i4m1 S� 4� �5..rr di E-.�yJ.y°e2Ep� E°c a�9 g fill - eg 5 S • 9 a$A As � spe^"� °E°pc -� s° 'BgYa° ,figa 5; =3 W S N.1 9..e Spy Yiy y°_. s.<E ei °2 u •"Tob qNC mL 4 p3Gy9 .0 E�—Sp�eiy 3rd°��Ea°ms as esa ' e95'yOn ev cs u � �° E�mF°39=fig • � � ag X % % X % % X K % % X % X % % X tj is O a .. 5 LL J 88 u z° c 3 z° otl 88 3 8u iE 3� 8 8 S w� NI Fl B ,I. 1 G1waRV ormFf91M ' tl . .��,' se ilia loll r 9 , I I v � r-'I' •1. i '1 HI -- ' .A.? 1 �iti��'�� P�����► '� r yam 'o ^ tit, z i �►".4t� .� yq �✓✓ vi-- � � ��y��'33'j% f/�� ��i �1� 'I`ili�1��nt p'I'ro r��'y' j���r`+}� '1► i t+ 1 9 4 law- � . ' III !:�9y-v9�► § ' iol. lot, . | # M ® .§ . � \ / | ! � . . „;■ ! ; . £ a 1HE a pa :»3 6f9 27 fll I: 25 aV 3 V Y M . �• .:.. �i�l' b b � •� a�.."a 8 1 � � " t 8 OVSyN a m e s e iah �5 C 2 B y�y8 mill � � .a E 'S S 5 5 s •y � y o g 9§¢s �b z � � •u yq�y� $� e �"'$�qaq�y7, tdi�lq m � . e � b �a � Y. 5 = C T V ED Cq a gS E ua 9 Y tt m c z Cr _ U. = - n & = bRRih E3 x55 (C.x • Q u 6wS5 vE=.q U „ 7� • ° q$ c .4 DUp 60 SCDr' h E= >✓J" W $j Z�p q=c (tl yo8�D', -y E I U °N' *V/iV\� • s � b� � d S 0 D i 'y^D • Ogg � tl ° o S T In r a •��i���\�a^\ -� J• � D7�r7. C d � � �ES � Na 8 � ^�dp -E' cc • �I A • � a vs 1rT,I r 1 a � tf 13 � o u se k ' F C w a PC hO.,,r'1 V F� ;L4 y d *1 S C � V1 ry • r> r� W CC A > a • w U • L ' a I •02 e � €o a <y `SI u ! ! 71 /✓ j Q v � � O O d T m _-__ 3 � 'pp t0J �• f OCp W ! e A N C < 'E / j F E eo $ c o Ln_ V pp • � ^Q I' tC y C_ :J `n + j s i e ho =W o<sm 4 O YN< \ Y � N �. j 9 YYY 2o<WW \ /I • Qe�� d fA36<6 j \ ( 7 � ! 1 : \ � � k A§ / | 2§ |L=u§ §zov§ 2 Z , ! -J,_! � \ � 0 N 0 '| 0 \(j e / ( Z \\ � o ! \ | \} . \ | ) 1 ji , \ � � • % | � t .. • Y C N � YY r- MOY MY CYBa ! Q j P 3 w Y•' OC Yy POy NM O C ,NYq NMLA qy d s sO •I.�i O 9 N yAYO OUCy p9 P q q PUY •.P1 (4�.Oi0 O P w W 1 Y C•.yr-IAQ a LT, N TY q 9 m C"• Y V d A d Y0 ) GM.. U {41 pC4 •• j 'O V P `yg � O• M�gp,�W OYppC4 , O d C I i4 P W � e�l••CIw O.MYgy bCPT.1 P C _ w U 94 aeli r` tl9 MS MqN N A n y U 9 A S 0 a 0 a a Y A 4 B a , O Ipsl LLYY•• oOIY a ^ V V , tl Y 9Y •.V 4 pMa 4pa, 0 ML 1a•1 4 40 00 VK.) O Tpa9a .Yj ON Y 4U sp Ui VTmud GCYY T 0 0 dw y� N m miI 4g09y 00495 ..1 4 S d H.„ fy M Y gYtl ) Y O4 N Mw q Y .•la �i C'� U G A •• ) OaM• A d AgMO Ny iM •OI y - W � N P E P •4 yL n1M O `Y U• fP F4 A0. aw O q'p mC TL (� m TUmOW V Ny PR 9 , •4 U 'J hl bP V 9NU CM1 L .1 w C f C ? m N U Y N Y m tl 4 U•I P M •' SCnq A L' •-1Cpj m ) d4MU m0 > OS iLP C Y % q • US •. V C F 9 a •U Y U } m m m w M y iiII 1 A P A G M U U' O ri •1 w � Z N Y U � S T4F A: .'1•.ICMM .ry0 4 M RS O • dl C40m w y g 4 C OYOOw 4 , % V pg1O F.10 .SF U4w A 9 W d �5+1 p T M A C m 9 Y 4 P M A i.Y ti M U C O q AY 9 p Y qM Onlw , NMOMN Yq N 0+1 MY U S, SQL a ZSay y O Oaw ) OM S.•1 ) U4 SF. a KD Sy U U 2 UY m , ! I 1 V I I'VpA I I 1 f 1 �V I Q l � 1 „d•u �h I V - O 0 1 Q�pI .`'• n II ' W cr n W m W W 1 _ e I F I , O >NY 9 tl tlP M•yM� dE 0 "I [$°$[ pp G9 �S 9•PI Y~ 4iUNP 'J p q �GMp S at Cw Y40 �48N4q 9G9000 q iS G dGbN�d C.Ny q✓ 'T O 'I"• tl� C pO Q 'a=tl .Pi KFLOOUpMN aUYYCY 9 E � Y P' •✓G0 SYM 'O GL .MU � we g q m O ' 4 A M ° ti d aV Y d ✓N 0 OY O 'm 0 u 'y Oq G 0 A✓ y . % YM 0 YY NjOy U p�OA E ' M M 9 Y A v L..Ply yjfMdgN gOUN'.lq Y O A i M .Ni ✓ HL LMiNOd ,B i1WdUM O" FZ u Z .i N.+✓0 m 4 %O G n O d o- 0 tl i ZqG 4y Y ✓7.di ol. NYG W d..tl1Y Y U '9 P a G qw• O£ UMA4.•.tli O Y'M Z F S W 1- 00,00 .$0•M. P NYq Y v d Ad qNm 9 y Nd Y C i ' LFSd 5Lm.SG dM✓ 0,0 UM Y q . 0Y OyOgtl CC y q w G N M y q N Y PC 0 M .; yNYM U'^ Gy mTCou Co O.M T ✓ ti Y d C d Ay U A U❑❑d q 9 C V M O H Y~ 4 F PypO P - moo d 3 Y C .Gi 4L W F £ GA OyOC q' dgY YpH U m ..Oi'ON 0'.'1F y Y A tl N.N q go NG3A^'T' Y.j.G1M'1 G4 gdH MG Tmi d Yp 9V- Ovt. ~Go P . GO ONLO y 1h y LM CA " R kU0 d N 09' mPtl N d N9Y p C4.. N F R C 40.W 1 g✓d ptlt d NG9 YN H 4y W U SS,S 00» OY 0. 40 O W M ¢ b V it O 4 W9 ✓'YYS 9ytlmgw G m9 4•+ ✓ G gCWFau OY MYYNA4 00 d RSOOO HU O tlY 0 ry U 0Y TM gmtlG mmg 9 LpOyLyYAAd14 Y.�I ° G9gNIdi� UO YN WY C✓ p 91 YM 00 a1 HO m 0 .0 0 v CCGN O.H 0 N dO G.10 O6 A W m Ho y4 ..uuup � EEI NW5 OUY 90G ❑tl q0 Vtl� y i 45 UN. riWg{� G Y112 G0 2✓YM m •� O tiHL9 m0 Y O 9 m 0.� �� m� Y�Y mQM egOw Y q 1„ UC £ Y6g tl O °�p� m,09AC Go FO T" 224 °.m{ m u0 oH.Ui Wp .H0 AU UMti-O p G4mmO g., ✓0 J rZ�. 444��� pYp'yNy .0 Q3 C G LL °✓ o V yNO pN iL FFW.T00. Y0✓ �i �cx% . O 0d m W G P -4101 «O CL • YA Z . 04tl o 09Tt�y Q v 1 0 8;.ffl pM S 2I%Y� o b N ro✓ Y G tlNOC p Y uU u� $p n ou �w °i e a � � d' NNyO P m0 99✓'1 Pi - av 000.° R, ut . qW Z w qW GiV u HW Y�Y {O{I�L qqq d AYOOrY1 ✓MN yt�� 0 OQ { ^ 509Ly 4C y S GP 06GG9 MIYNUAYSy ti mtl0 � NY 'O 11 QW uS N V OW N 4 u mY9 0 NN49 NY�YYH O m NG.ay mA✓ U 0M.1 Y J ICV tYt�� % yy yy tl d7 .1.1w9 ✓ tl tltlm M q p( Q n NU °.'°{10 ~ tl 0.Mti9 09✓ iYd MM aamn Y i <� % Q 9grIC� CgO0 , 01m ym1 U p M MMO 9 .� O 099 tl -ImCMm Or G O_ t 40UnN y AYH MHO Om O W.4m O K F H q M 9 N 9.4 ✓ d H N m H M q n y E ty U � Gi Z Q g i M . P E P l� C C a C J O O 8 tOii C m ^ N n C 10 E =' E� o— Bm m S n 7d w EN �EcaD n 'g y,a`' 0 C mmcAm(J m v8 3 w a o` N nSA a.Em'S t°. 8uE CL U) a N8ON2.F `o n._ WnWc c u E4 mv '^ t cv « 00 '❑ L'o � C � 4n E E s Eu 2 tl A m tltl O0 : ££y m OU -O � m E'S ERn y C� �3 EE N N m m m p � t0 O m t mWS mc� m N N � w" r v A w 2•c & •OdZ O A ECO B❑ E� c A -o h 1 UA I IOL f a �mn � vv J m H °H -- � 9 y 2 o>v E n �$ +v "u $ ° cA �aPmUEppE � $ E On m L' O m R C 6 r N 9 6 dN 6"1 N C V C Cp Ea tca m v3cd r' `m `0 5' •S� A .- om 10 g'E8 N . AEG"o o $ co;r7.erg a— E `o �N9 `0 '- E_ �t E.G E N ; v;'E5 �gm" A N Es � ngB o `ov u8 fn E .E�F� °o i= m0O Sa FF5 N N ❑ :h1 Q Z d ° U'n0 cT U❑� N � ^' E $' � y Typn@ cr6� 8.2m 3zi8mFd � m �EE ❑ x OQSN � Bg� E89 e$m� g li g cg 8t 16 ts wpN $ g� 1.00 E0m CI > Orm W m m L A m E O yy A r N 2S w 6 LL3 E :�ypE.'$ t 'jP°jag� �'8 G EE A I EE@@ 19 a� p''pnm'�$ c kk c N 9 m gE E E$Ey o a 4 E y ma E m U w a mmz C; g2 t 'c 'e� w U Lg' c a E g -6 n Ei 2 o 8 Fc w4 c-g 0£ NmF E' a F Z m e m „E 9 1Q 3 9 ay 3 w$ v' 8 a m C - Q t o c A m 5 � O F � T N o y a a (EQ 5 c c mz g�S rQC1 v N b vF�j g c� m ss N •`OF C m [$ O y� a q0 g n N E L 4 A z m $ 6 3 ti ❑ >$Y wp KZ E2 m Mg Pe9E —NUen A_ Y❑ 3 een� Z ¢ � ¢ �i8 ° v4 .@r0 8 �c� � � i^SSE S En O' W-S oB , nEnE m ❑ cecTo 0 1- Ecm °O�' �d d� 4N w lil ow� } wQnE' 0 �gm8 " a v^ E A £ O m E W s „ 52 si0 $§ m N acs US E a m AL � C � .O `= CIE= d� m•_ C_ 6 p n c £ $ E n '2 @mom ° $ d o C R N 3 N 0� m .4 d � d L CCCC y i •u ry dm 0= LE d $Dm � �$ m Scn ` dry $ NNa £ m W Q eS n'n@ CN9 �� F P N m m L L✓ y °.0�. °C m q C ° � �gg o o m°mWp mc �.yZ gUOmU � kpm � .fi e z d£ °ENd c 'E u.. 1mm° c£ oo coN i A LL c Q N _ >0 > ..O. G .Y mo_2ax Nz'd w my � $ $ L Y� SSE B v�'m= p£ gQ dim �°>� mNp € c dnv SA 8�g� 3KE Kc3 la-° $. IIc L @d ?F °U � mc aF .. E c i� `m m R 3ain C O E2Z >'oi $3 �5 (mJEmg W N EE d F a ¢ y n n d 6� yc�EaE d da R~ y� jd $ S ° UQ✓ -0 > 0 L O d $ d N 2.0 T c c r„ y s° ;_ s � m d O YO 0 a m 6 c O .a d o m Y U O g N C Q > a 0q 9'L� O Q°1 ; L C N to ca onA � c�i $ c 0 Qn ;�sF� uEi `o m m a m 0 m o Q ai m cycc c O Y N = d 6 A W H 7W C `Vq OE p GOA 61 u swE M m ° Y yLY NV ' O O NL pT Y YN _ i 9ZL 9% V•'1 Lb ri�llI Yyy Y_ •V •M Y V Y • ° o : ° E ° v ° S � 9 e j� _ w ¢o Vi Lry9 E8 EL Y 9 yO0 YY T 60 Yygygyq� M 1 < Oiu Zm " aL O A Ye YQ ;Y Y 1; <V A •O 1�•i' I,.�J1,�$..%%�,� ', o • `dY$� aL �y y. `J" � yyu L° � (�a�j (%yy(Mpmx q 1.I�� ,� � m ¢ O OSWN C G f99 YG H0. N MC�J% V Y nY \•�� VVV y pp CC O y Opq UM i00 NACTy �N Um0 J p°� m swE��Zy m � kx W.. mE� rn Y UJJ�RSC NOC�a d 5 _ .0 go 0g d mdmd Uu;a O> Y wO CC 00 0. 9 U Y W '•� Y O _ C--i kdCti ViCd � OnyYp� y my °n N d pp bd N n �/•� y a =40 d Wg w O d A G 0 L - ¢ - ° y W Y q y L N i V U m < m y,JO �a,:m 'U--'Q C ' 'yV U 0.d.� Y E•°j M F1 d M 2 pNp ppN 2 yMER �p q ow,Y CL m.Y N _ _ i RNi°• W . ~ MfOC E W aWq£ dOm VJ w U d U E Yaww °'9M [L+ 6'O8 V MtiU ¢ eA ° '� U ry 5 al yNL^I ° mV SJ T m ¢ O M d N M l� .. - W R NN yd Jq�0YA0V 000 .00 dw U U dWd I� 3° ¢ u £ £Wfm O 4mdN TM£ U N ¢U K U • Y •v . ' u�r•�� i 741� .�� 1• ij 1 18, � R y� r �� ��_JIB . ',,�1��w �:y�•` •���� � ,`4'. 0 0 ° a�"S `•p r• �I f �� a• 0 11. S �y < OAR7=AIPIE 4RTA7XEN7 AT FMXAWM fEMMY FCR 87EHLOM KOM SECTION-'M' Y sue, y"c,r' A-......I.. � STERLING AVENUE LANDWAPE CWRODOR SECTON-TS` u•.c.n r..r FAST DAM 2)APUYDN ROAD dAMDWAPfE 7R€AMEN7 A: w SECTION-`CC` p� _ N'. � _�.( I�r xwx•. a .n V .r.....,r.r ........ EC W OMOMCD"U EYFLOGMFMAGEHCY na.s,s. rii'w~.ux....un•rn nix,.r mrrerm mmerunr,w•stixx.ur wxrra. ,u�.u.„„uur STERLING SE AVENUE SIMREA ENT S MAINTENANCE DISTRICT m mro eistoartt SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE/MITIGATION PLAN lu=lop�ft t t t mmr�m�T� . . . ,.��,z��• fig, �*''3-� n ' ��j9(T, ��5��y.AC t�,�• ;T,oal K°bj e 77 r M�i n rt , �•t t ��� 9,, ��;/igl qsd �f•��,r� _� • l t� fi L r A S n •X •+i i101 Nm 1���I•�A� �ro II11 � � „ w adz �FOn alb e m WF� z � _ o a m �r Z m g^ Z coo W O Z w :wm OWZW v ¢zaa > Z o uo OO �Z Oe¢ z :. ad. F' aoo <Fa M0z `� �v<F— x M 0 =0=Woc? 8 LL Q Z(7¢Hx u F— cr =¢,O,!Zo l'J o la. O zz ox 1 U) zowz N Z Z Q Z O H W. II T j � Z=�OJ r nw m CL Cl) ¢ Q¢ y5y5 i � m It H mWOO a C 2 b } :— ^ CL W C z_0 LL N / • r1. __ ri is — _ _i. $ e51= oil ! a `•Lu oil e c2 t, W Fa,a pp� _ '” aka e a�� Ye+iSeS�a.!! h"a �Y� / I qq L T .� �• � J"r' t_ 1, / •� r, 6 VIA"T �71 , • � -r _ yea •II".'.. y � qq 4 WARNER W. HODGDON HEART BAR RANGE,ARROWHEAD SPRINGS FM POSE N BOO.116 SAN BERERNARAR DINO. 821.15 7 91106 P14)Beuso TELECO". January 26, 1994 trulBBC-sec: Ms. Shauna Clark City Administrator City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418-0001 RE: 1/22/86 Full Standard Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Access, and Highland Avenue/Rt.330/City Creek-Cook Canyon Area as related to: Rancho San Andreas-Secret Hollow Ranch and RSA-Highland Hills Dear Ms. Clark: This letter is to thank you in advance for any time allowed to us regarding the above; Aaron and I appreciate the burdens of your duties. The applicable Deliverables to you are submitted concurrently with this letter and are listed on the attached Index thereof. I have made an effort to describe our constructive purpose herein. (See attached Index of Correspondence,Documentation and Photologs forwarded to Shauna Clark,City Administrator) Though our lifetime of commitment to the City continues; every effort, time, hard work and capital is being wasted away by indifference to meaningful accomplishment within the City process and WITH NO productive accountability. This internal shuffle of responsibility has grown beyond anyone's capacity to deal with and that of others. I feel this emulates mainly from lack of knowledgeable experience in transforming the paper process into productivity. Thus needed sound investment to build the City is curtailed, and all consuming sub-standard long term agreements that syphon away the City's future stability are promoted by the City process as progress. My fear, and that of others, comes from the eroding of existing resources and diminishing new resources generated being unable to keep up with the discharge. We understand your charge is to administer these varying actions and not the initiated underlying consequences caused by others. Accordingly, I know you well grasp the City structure and which you must work within. As you know, my concerns are of rampant deteriorating neighborhoods at all levels, and firm convictions that they have the number one effect on the depreciation of the long term City (East Valley) revenue resource base. Every citizen's equity in their homes and combined mortgages are by far the largest Multi-Billion Capital Investment in the City. These 4 are depreciating rapidly and recent data points to a 24% percent value decrease in the 1993 residential base alone. This depreciation is even more applicable to Retail, Commercial and Industrial. When all direct and indirect revenue resources are considered, the importance of economically viable existing neighborhoods and new neighborhoods to support viable i HERITAGE OF THE MOUNTAMS AND VArtET BEGAN M 1850 ((�� OHEADQUARTERS:PORT OFHCE BOO 21a6,ARROWHEAD WRMGS,SAN BERNARDMO,CALR3RNIA 93106 RESIDENCE M MG:3295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN RERNARI)M.CALWORN1A 93101,(111)083 4153 A TAMER V.NOp4'pON FA yGBOV ARRIAT6 Page 2 growth is validated in ratio to their overall generated source of City Revenues, i.e.: Ad Valorem tax, Utility tax, Incremental Project Area Tax, City Service Charges, (water, sewer, trash, etc.). This is compounded with the socio/economic fact that homes are the riP mart' footings to reinforce existing Job Retention, induce New Jobs, source of Sales Tax and other direct and indirect City Revenues, Fees, etc. In effect the present result of the broad deteriorating neighborhood base is more than triple jeopardy. Commercial/retail/office/private enterprise investment values and revenues are in serious decline. Thus jobs leave and related public revenues decline progressively thereafter, while welfare, unemployment and the cost of crime increase. In proof, 60% of the City's Budget is Public Safety Cost for Police 42%± and Fire 18%±. Acting Police Chief Wayne Harp called this a "Poor Portrait" of the City in the recent Sun January 10, 1994 article, "S.B. grant would add 23 officers". The referenced 1992 FBI Report also pointed out that the City is first in the State and 13th in the Nation for crime. Negative facts qualified the City for a $1.9 Million grant with matching local funds of $2.8 Million; the facts also point out that the City tax base could not support any increased cost of Public Safety. (See attached January 10, 1994 article:"S.B.grant would add 23 officers") • I have addressed these diminishing returns and imprudent costs for both our future personal meeting and to the City itself in my January 8, 1994 letter to City Attorney Penman (page 4, para. 5 and 6). My letter to him was copied you for your purview; this addressed, but not limited to, the City cost of Crime/Public Safety, Neighborhood Deterioration, Multi- Million Legal Damages against the City and legal cost for Violation of Rights and No Due Process. • (For reference see previously forwarded January 8,1994 Wamer Hodgdon letter to James Penman,City Attorney) I recently viewed the Council discussions on October 21, 1993 and November 1, 1993 regarding the City/EDA funding of: Rogers Bindery $500 thousand± relocation assistance inducement, John Dukes $4 Million± residential interim construction loan, Community • Hospital $8.5 Million Professional Building Loan Guarantee. Also included are the Wal-Mart Development Agreement provisions, but not limited to, for Highland Avenue Area resulting Multi-Million Windfall Profits being made by interim out-of-town land owners and others , from City/EDA/IVDA impact cost/loss of up to $5.4 Million. I have viewed these in comparison to equal treatment between local and out of town participating parties. I will address the Council by letter for the record regarding the inconsistent handling of these • matters and "Windfall Profits" at a later date. Few realize that the City Attorney's Office is legal advisor to the City/EDA and scrutinizes all of these dealings for result. The City has dedicated staff. and I enclose my January 20. 1994 like letters to those in Planning and the Department of Public Works keeping them apprised and thanking them for their efforts and honesty. The Index of Deliverable Correspondence, Documentation, • Photologs forwarded to them is included with each separate letter. Accordingly, my letter to them also includes my January 4 and January 5, 1994 letters to Mr. Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services regarding the Sterling Avenue Area and Highland Avenue/Rt. 330/City Creek-Cook Canyon Area. For your purview and awareness we are providing you applicable Deliverables and the Index thereof is attached hereto. • HERMAGE OF THE MOUNTA AND VAII.EY BEGAN N 1850 r}� OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFH¢BOX 2116,ARROWF�AD SPRDIGS,SAN BERNA Wo,CALn'OR 92b W READEN�MAn.MG:5295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDR40,CANE .9210!,()11)1950155 ���yyyy • A 9A0. X V.XOOGDON FAMLLY G0.0UP A- 1 Page 3 (See enclosed January 20, 1994 Warner Hodgdon letter to Valerie Ross and Staff RE: Sterling Avenue Area and RL 330/City Creek Area with Index of Related Correspondence,Documentation and Photologs) (See enclosed January 4 and 5, 1994 Warner Hodgdon letters to Al Boughey RE:Sterling Avenue and Rt.3301City Creek Area with Index of Related Correspondence,DOcurnentation and Photologs) Background: Aaron and his brothers acquired RSA-Secret Hollow Ranch on September 19, 1991 with the Titled 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Access. This Titled access included the 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Public Road(s) with Engineering Plans approved for construction by the City, Recorded and Faithful Performance Bond. The curtailment cost to RSA is over $1 Million just to reconfirm these previously recorded 1/22/86 Dedicated Public Road(s) through Planning/City Attorney and completed July 3, 1993. This also included a Supplemental EIR with DFG concurrence. The related RSA impact cost/loss could reach several million more. Beginning February 1988, RSA worked with the City, City/EDA and neighborhood homeowners for the Highland Hills Specific Plan area. The homeowners had filed a legal action against the City, Mayor and Council, DERC and Highland Hills Properties, a Limited Partnership, on January 14, 1988. RSA had been requested by Highland Hills Properties to consider acquisition, and by the City Attorney to Defend the City, Mayor and Council and DERC process. Mr. William E. Leonard is the Highland Hills Lid. Partners General Partner, William Smith (deceased) was a General Partner. Limited partners are: Jeffrey and Marvin Reimer, (Former Sun Publisher), Glen L. Davis, D.D.S., Carl Hendricks, MD., Dr. Wilbur and Henrietta Eich, C. L and Leona Bangsund, Martin and Margaret Match, Dr. Philip and Janet Pope, and Dr. Elmer Hansen A City/Highland Hills Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement was approved by the City on May 16, 1989 and effective only concurrently with the June 2, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR. The Legal Actions were dismissed with RSA paying all related costs. There was No Cost and No Loss to the City. As provided therein, the RSA North Plans of Development with Golf Course (Highland Hills Specific Plan as amended) were considered and designated the Preferred Land Use, grandfathered and incorporated into the June 2, 1989 Updated General Plan/FEIR. Both the City/Homeowners Settlement Agreement and the Updated City General Plan/FEIR became effective July 3, 1989. The State Office of Planning and Research effective date was July 3, 1989 and the Superior Court approved the City/Homeowners Agreement on that date. There was a July 3, 1989 Save San Bernardino legal action against the City, Mayor, Council and DERC regarding the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR process. This had nothing to do with RSA, however, the City Attorney requested RSA to Defend the City, Mayor/Council and DERC. By January 1991 the Dismissal of the action was filed with the Court. RSA again paid all related costs. There was No Cost and No Loss to the City. " The curtailments to RSA-Highland Hills Golf Course and Resort have been on-going. Never-the-less, starting April 27, 1993 it required until July 1, 1993 for RSA to finally meet, by my firm persistence, with Planning/City Attorney for the Rancho San Andreas (RSA)- North/South Overall Enhanced Resource Management Plan and project Implementation. We were then informed by them of a Planning/City Attorney/Consultant internal Conflict of Interest with RSA-Highland Hills to other unnamed City Applications. Planning then HERBAGE OF THE MOUIvt iS MD VAUET BEGAN IN 1850 0 HEADQUARTERS:P05T OFFICE BOX 1118,ARROW1ffAD SPRINGS,S BERNARDDVO.CAIhORMA 95108 RESIDENCE MARJNG:5195 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAM BERNARO..CA FoaM 95101,(n1)8830151 WW A VARNER V.HODLBON iAMLLYCROU9 NtR1RTE Page 4 requested RSA to meet on July 14, 1993 and confirmed the City caused June 4, 1993 specific internal conflict of interest with their consultant. At that time Planning committed to confirm the RSA suggested alternate consultant as acceptable to Planning/City Attomey/DFG/DAG and with no internal conflict of interest. Planning then wrote RSA by it's August 13, 1993 letter that RSA could not implement Highland Hills Golf Resort under the CUP(s) process as provided in the July 3, 1989 City/Highland Hills Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement and concurrent Updated City General Plan. The acceptable non-conflict consultant confirmation was omitted. (See attached August 13, 1993 letter by At Boughey, DPBS to Warner Hodgdon/RSA RE: Non-implementation of Highland Hills) This Planning position was given to RSA on July 14, 1993 by Al Boughey, DPBS, after he admitted only brief review and understanding of the July 3, 1989 City/Homeowners Agreement. Such on-going accumulative curtailments have caused a RSA-Highland Hills Area impact Cost/Loss reaching $50 Million. RSA's major decision to acquire Highland Hills in March 1990 was due to the City approval of the July 3, 1989 City/Highland Hills Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement and Updated City General Plan and FEIR. After RSA repeated requests for Mr. Boughey's committed July 14, 1993 letter, Warner Hodgdon/RSA received, six months later, an incomplete January 14, 1994 letter as to an alternate consultants acceptability. I have responded by my applicable January 25, 1993 letter to Mr. Boughey. Mr. Empefio, DCA as advisor to the City, Planning Department, Planning Commission and DERC was copied Mr. Boughey's letters to RSA. (For response to At Boughey letter dated January 14, 1994 see previously forwarded Warner Hodgdon letter dated January 25, 1994) We do need your help, wisdom and direction to constructively cope with this from an internal City perspective. During other difficult times in the City everyone has honestly worked together to help each another with no special interest or hidden agenda(s). This resulted in being able to continue giving to the City and it's Citizen's for the Communities future betterment. A workable consensus is required immediately to implement existing and future constructive endeavors to off-set the deteriorating neighborhoods and growing unreplaced Job Losses (Norton 1988-1994 27,000 direct and indirect jobs). Be assured we will give are best. There is no one with deeper years of sincere respect for you. Thank you. Sincerely, /' QZVG�r� 11 Warner W. Hodgdo CC: Aaron W.Hodgdon HERBAGE OF THE MOUNrA AND VAUEY BEGAN Dl 1830 1J HEADQUMTERS:POST OFHCE BOX 1146,MROwHEAD SRRDiGS,SAN BERNARDINO.CAIIFORNU y2406 XT RESIDENCE MAB G:3295 BROADMOOR BOUI£VARD,SAN BERNARDM,CAIab 92484,(1141 8 8 3-01 3J WW A mA0.NER V.MMWN FAMM1Y G0.pN AiilllATE January 26, 1994 Index of Previously Forwarded Correspondence to Shauna Clark, City Administrator I. January 4, 1994 Mr.Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bemardino Planning Department RE: January 4, 1993 Planning Director Al Boughey meeting with Warner Hodgdon and Aaron Hodgdon,RSA (1) Related 127/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area (2) Related RL 330 and Highland Avenue Area II. January 5, 1994 Mr.Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bernardino Planning Department RE: January 4, 1993 Director of Planning and Building Services,At Boughey meeting with Warner Hodgdon and Aaron Hodgdon,RSA (1) Related 122/86 and 7/3/93 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area (2) Related 7/3/89 RL 330 and Highland Avenue Area III. January 8, 1994 Mr.James F.Penman City Attorney City of San Bernardino RE: Warner Hodgdon December 11, 1993 letter to James F.Penman,City Anomey RE: Stubblefield$11.537 Million Damages Awarded Against the City April 2, 1991 for. Violation of Rights to Build 492 Low and Moderate income Apartments City and Superior Court Approved July 3, 1993 City/Highland Hills Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement City/DFG February 5, 1993 Allegations served; Warner Hodgdon/Rancho San Andreas Company(RSA)for, The Sterling Avenue Area and Highland Hills RE: James F.Penman Civic Center Motel DA Campaign Photographs December 23, 1993 IV. January 20, 1994 Ms.Valerie C.Ross Acting Principle Planner City of San Bemardino RE: 122/86 Full Standard Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Access,and Highland Avenue/RL 330/City Creek-Cook Canyon Area as related to: RSA-Secret Hollow Ranch and RSA-Highland Hills V. January 25, 1994 Mr.Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bernardino Planning Department RE: Planning Confirmation letter of acceptability and internal non-conflict with: Planning,City Attorney,Department of Fish and Game and Deputy Attorney General for Lilbum Corporation,RSA-Highland Hills North/South ERMP and Implementation Page 1 of 1 Index of Related Correspondence Forwarded to At Boughey, Director of Planning, and Shauna Clark, San Bernardino City Administrator The following is s being delivered to you as a letter,bound document or included as an attachment. I. February 15, 1993 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino RE: City Supplemental Agenda Items S-1 and S-3,February 15, 1993: Appropriate$200,000 from General Fund Reserve to City Attorney Budget RE:Outside Attomey(s) City/Stubblefield Agreement Rt.330 Primary/Secondary Access H. March 22, 1993 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino RE: City/Stubblefield Agreement Primary/Secondary Access Rt.330 Council Agenda Item 39 III. April 19, 1993 Mr. Henry Empebo Deputy City Attorney City of San Bernardino RE: ERC/DRC Meeting April 15, 1993 Agenda Item 3,Tentative Tract 14112 Henry Empefto misleading comments and misrepresentation IV. May 20, 1993 Mr. Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services Mr. Greg Gubman, Associate Planner City of San Bernardino Planning Department RE: The Sterling Avenue Area May 17, 1993 Planning Pre-Meeting For: Planning Commission Meeting May 18, 1993 and Council Action May 24, 1993 Subject: Sterling Heights Supplemental EIR Stubblefield Rt.330 Initial Study,September 11, 1992 Borrow Site and Grading Plan for Rt.330 Freeway Fill Material (City Consultant:Tom Dodson&Associates) DFG/RSA Meeting April 27, 1993-Highland Hills Enhanced Resource Plan Empeno Conflict with Stubblefield Rt. 330 480 Apartment Site V. May 21, 1993 Mr. Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services May 18, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Item 9,Supplemental EIR(City Consultant Tom Dodson&Associates) Index of Forwarded Correspondence for Shauna Clark, City Administrator Page 1 of 4 Sterling HeighL%%e Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Access 1/22/86 Reconfirmation "City Hypocrisy" Sterling Heights Legal Counsel letter of May 17, 1993 Stubblefield vs The City of San Bernardino Tom Dodson& Associates Conflict to RSA Highland Hills as City Consultant For Stubblefield 50 year Development Agreement RL 330 Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary Access to 480 High Density Apartments VI. May 24, 1993 Mr. Henry EmpetSo Deputy City Attorney City of San Bernardino RE: Mark Urban,DAG/Henry Empefio,Esq. Tuesday,April 27, 1993 Joint Meeting a Attendees:Dan McKinney,Esq.,Reid&Hellyer,Warner Hodgdon and Aaron Hodgdon,RSA Purpose:Fish and Game Resolve,Captain McBride and Mike Giusti,Biologist Dedicated Sterling Avenue and Highland Hills Ranch,Cook Canyon VII. July 12, 1993 Mr. Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bernardino Planning Department (1) Special Council Meeting,June 28, 1993: Rancon/City 25 year Development Agreement under. 2 Miltion sq.ft.,300 thousand sp ft Density Transfer Shift.8 high rise buildings Increase from 4 stories to 20 stories(280-300 Feet High)CUP and Code Amendment Initial Environmental Study(IES)and Negative Declaration Tiered on 1983 General Industrial Redevelopment Project Area FEIR for (2) Planning Meeting for Clarification and Direction to RSA-Highland Hills, July 1, 1993: City Environmental(Biologist)Consultant Conflict of Interest(Tom Dodson&Associates) Sterling Heights-The Sterling Avenue Area-Stubblefield-Highland Hills Pu=se•Rancho San Andreas North Plan(s)of Development(RSA)Implementation and DFG/Citv1RSA Ba Data and Highland Hills Overall Enhanced Resource Management Plan Attendees: At Boughey,Planning Director, Valerie Ross,Acting Principle Planner;Henry Empefio,Deputy City Attorney;and Tom Dodson,Environmental Consultant;Warner Hodgdon and Aaron Hodgdon,RSA (3) DFG/City/Lilbum Corporation/RSA Base Data For and With: DFG/City/RSA-Highland Hills Enhanced Resource Management Plan Includes:DFG/City Alleged issues and any Settlement Process (4) DFG Biologist Mike Giusti Scheduled a Meeting on Friday,July 9, 1993 For:Joint Review of RSA Overall Highland Hills for Monday,July 19, 1993,8:30 AM Canceled by DFG Patrol Captain Mike McBride Friday.July 9. 1993 (S) July 9, 1993 City Planning Request to Meet with RSA-Highland Hills VIII. July 23, 1993 Mr. Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bernardino Planning Department Index of Forwarded Correspondence for Shauna Clark, City Administrator Page 2 of 4 D RE: (1)Planning meeting,Wednesday,July 14, 1993: Rancho San Andreas North Plans of Development(RSA)Implementation RSA-Highland Hills Specific Plan 82-1 as amended,Considered and Designated the Preferred land Use Grandfatheied and Incorporated into the June 2, 1989 Updated City General Plan and FEIR under the:City Approved May 16, 1989 and Superior Court Approved July 3, 1989 City/Highland Hills Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement Attendees: AI Boughey,Director,Valerie Ross,Acting Principle Planner Sandy Paulsen,Senior Planner and Warner-Aaron Hodgdon,RSA (2)Planning Meeting for Clarification and Direction to RSA-Highland Hills, July 1, 1993: City Environmental(Biologist)Consultant Conflict of Interest(Tom Dodson&Associates) Sterling Heights-The Sterling Avenue Area-Stubblefield-Highland Hills Purpose*Ranchg San Andreas North Plan(s)of Development(RSA)Implementation and DFG/Citv/RSA Base Data and Highland Hills Overall Enhanced Resource Management Plan IX. September 3, 1993 Mr. Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bernardino Planning Department RE: City Development and Environmental Review Committee, Final Agenda Items 4 and 5 August 26, 1993(attached) Stubblefield Construction Company Planning Applications, East Route 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre Site: (1) March 26, 1993 Variance Application VAR 93-07 (2) March 26, 1993 Development Code Amendment Application DCA 93-05 (3) March 26, 1993 Development Agreement Application DA 93-01 per, March 22,1993 Unsigned 50 year Development Agreement and Attached July 14,1992 Planning Support letter (4) August 1993 Tom Dodson&Associates Initial Environmental Study(IES)and Recommended Negative Declaration for: Amendment toCity Development Code Subdivision Regulations/Access(19.30.200) (5) August 1993 Tom Dodson&Associates Initial Environmental Study(IFS)and, Recommended Negative Declaration for: Stubblefield/City 50 year Development Agreement 93-01 X. October 25, 1993 Mr. Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bernardino Planning Department RE: Planning Director Non-Response to RSA Request, July 14, 1993,August 19, 1993 and October 20, 1993 i.e.Written Response Confirming DFG/City Attorney and Planning acceptability of Lilbum Corporation For: Highland Hills Enhanced Resource Management Plan Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Application(s): East Rt.330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property . (1) Variance (2) Development Code Amendment (3) 50 year Development Agreement for. Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary Access and Maintenance Index of Forwarded Correspondence for Shauna Clark, City Administrator Page 3 of 4 July 15, 1991 City Attorney Recommendations For. (Agenda Item 39) City Initiated Amendment to the June 2, 1989 Updated City General Plan and FEIR For:Stubblefield 283 acre east/west RL 330 Property(766%Density Increase) XI. October 28, 1993 Mr. John Stubblefield Stubblefield Construction Company RE: Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s)For. (1)Variance,(2)Development Code Amendment,and(3)50 Year Development Agreement Development and Environmental Review Committee(DERC) Stubblefield East Rt.330/City Creek Canyon 20 Acre Property DERC September 23, 1993 Final Agenda Item 3 City Development Code Amendment XH. November 7, 1993 Mr. Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services City of San Bernardino Planning Department RE: Planning Director Non-Response to RSA as committed July 14, 1993 and, Respectfully Requests of July 14, 1993,August 19, 1993 and October 20, 1993 re: Written Response confirming DFG/City Attorney and Planning acceptability For. Lilburn Corporation(Environmental Biologist) DFG/City/RSA-Highland Hills Enhanced resolute Management Plan (Joint cooperation with DFG Biologist Mike Giusti to assemble Data Base etc. XDL January 9, 1994 Mr. John Stubblefield Stubblefield Construction Co. RE: John Stubblefield Comments on September 23, 1993 regarding Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary Access east RL 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Related Chronology I. Draft July 6, 1993 For Discussion Purposes Only THE STERLING AVENUE AREA CHRONOLOGY and BACKGROUND ACTIONS FUNDING STRUCTURE and TENTATIVE ACTION SCHEDULE THE STERLING AVENUE AREA PRIMARY/SECONDARY ACCESS IMPLEMENTATION with LANDSCAPE/MITIGATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION The Participating parties are: Sterling Heights,City/EDA Little Sand Canyon and RSA-Secret Hollow Ranch Sterling Avenue Area Acquisition Improvement District(s)/Ordinance and Maintenance District(s) Index of Forwarded Correspondence for Shauna Clark, City Administrator Page 4 of 4 • Catharine Hamm The S"n Asst.Managing Section B Editor/Metro Monday (909)386-3874 January 10, 1994 Fax(909)885-8741 Metro Final S. B. g-1 cant would add 23 Officers ,, ■ The Police Department POLICE applies for$1.9 million of a ing 174 fugitives. program t0 fight crime. Some 42 percent of the city's eneral fund goes to the Police By RICHARD BROOKS g Sun Staff Writer Department and its 256 officers. "Despite the fact that most of High crime rates and the lin- our personnel are deployed in pa- Bernd dino snag a may mill San on commontfor our calls for service federal grant that would put 23 to back up 30 to 40 calls on the • new police officers on the street weekends because of the violent "In the FBI Crime Report of crime within our city. 1992,San Bernardino was ranked "In some extreme cases -... ; first in the state and 13th in the patrol officers have handled over nation with respect to crime 50 calls for service each during rates,"says the 54-page grant ap- one 10-hour shift." plication."During the first half of The city's tax base can't sup- 1993, San Bernardino had the port a major increase in the po- highest murder rate in the state." lice budget,the report suggests. Cities throughout the nation "San Bernardino has experi- we competing for a share of the enced several major business clo- $150 million program. sures within the last.-.year and Fontana recently won a half. Our current unemploy- 00,000 to hire five officers. A more rate is 1t percent. Even $5 more telling is the fact that our decision on San Bernardino's ap- unemployment rate has been ap- plication is expected this month. proximately twice the national . San Bernardino's new officers average for each of the past five would be hired and -trained in years . .. (and) 34 percent of the three groups, with the earliest population is on welfare." graduates hitting the streets in It amounts to a bleak portrait, November. The city's three-year but that's what is needed to win cost would be$2.8 million.At the federal help, said Acting Police end of that period, the officers Chief Wayne Harp. would be incorporated into the Increased street patrols are a department budget. fundamental factor in lowering The grant is needed because crime rates,he said. city government has done all it "About a third of (officers') can to control the crime problem, time should be available for ran- the application says. -"Our in- door patrol. Our last study crease to crime over the last de- showed that less than 10 percent cade has been attributed to an _ probably about 5 percent — exodus of gang members and oth- was available,"Harp said. er criminals from the city of Los The crime rate seems to be Angeles,"police wrote. leveling off statewide, but that More than 2,100 gang mem- doesn't change the bottom line, bers belong to 10 major gangs Harp said. "There's probably within the city,they said.And 874 going to be very few cities more parolees were believed to be liv- deserving of federal assistance ing in San Bernardino—includ- than San Bernardino." NA2D�Ho Sp C I T Y O F O J fic 2 0 IN an Bernardino FOG'YDED DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES A L B O U G H E Y . A I C P D I R E C T O R August 13 , 1993 Mr. Warner Hodgdon Heart Bar Ranch Post Office Box 2146 San Bernardino, CA 92406 Dear Warner: This letter is a follow-up of our meeting of July 14, 1993. At the meeting we discussed the Highland Hills Specific Plan and the settlement agreement. As noted during the meeting, we believe it will be necessary to amend the Specific Plan to incorporate provisions of the settlement agreement, including the proposed golf course and associated facilities. The amendment would also be necessary if you wish to revise the project. Amending a Specific Plan is a project as defined by state law, and therefore is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).. It will be necessary to do a subsequent or supplement Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to update the EIR originally prepared for the project. Under CEQA, the environmental process must address the project in its entirety; i.e. , any planned expansion. This could be a substantial effort. Provisions of the Congestion Management Plan, adopted in 1992, will also apply to your project. The process to amend a Specific Plan is the same as submitting a new Specific Plan. I have enclosed a copy of Chapter 19.64 of the Development Code, which explains the requirements for filing a Specific Plan or an amendment to a Specific Plan. Generally, you will need to: 1) Contact Planning staff to schedule a pre- application conference; and 2) Submit a pre-submittal application and fee with the Department. PRIDE IN PROGRESS 3 0 0 N 0 R T H . 0 S T fl E E T $ N B E fl N A D I N O I C A L I F O R N A 9 2 < 1 8 1 0 0 0 1 (T 1 < 1 3 8A-5 0] 1 /1 5 0 5 ] Warner Hodgdon Page 2 Following these basic steps, a scoping meeting will be held to identify any possible impacts. If a subsequent or supplement EIR is required, please be advised that the Specific Plan Amendment and environmental document must be prepared by different consultants. Warner, at the point you wish to move forward and submit the appropriate applications, we will need to get together to discuss the details of processing your project to best meet your needs. Please call if you have questions or comments. Sincerely, (01 Al Boughey Director of Planning and Building Services cc: Henry Empeno, Deputy City Attorney SPEC LLAC.MANS-19.64 CHAPTER 19.64 SPECIFIC PLANS 19.64.010 PURPOSE The purpose of this Chapter is to establish uniform procedures for the adoption and im- plementation of Specific Plans for the coordination of future development within the City,consistent with Section 19.10.010 (2)(E) (SP [Specific Plan] District) and pursuant to Government Code Section 65450 et&q. 19.64.020 PRE-SUBMITTAL AND PREPARATION OF SPECIFIC PLANS 1. A pre-submittal application and fee are required prior to filing a formal Specific Plan application. A pre-application conference with Department representatives is required prior to the filing of the formal specific plan application. 2. The Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR),if required,shall not be prepared by the same consulting firm. 3. Consultants and/or the applicant shall be responsible for preparation and advertisement of the Notice of Preparation(NOP) and the Notice of Completion (NOC) for the EIR,if an EIR is required. 4. Prior to the preparation of a Specific Plan or EIR the applicant shall hold a public scoping meeting to identify potential community impacts and concerns about the project. Public notice of the scoping meeting is required. Noticing ProOe- dures shall be defined by the Department at the pre-application conference. 19.64.030 CONTENT OF SPECIFIC PLAN A Specific Plan application shall include a text and a diagrams) which contain all of the provisions outlined in Government Code Sections 65451 and 65452,in addition to all data and related exhibits required by the Department. 19.64.040 HEARINGS AND NOTICE Upon receipt in proper form of a Specific Plan application,or direction of the Council, and following Department review,hearings shall be set before the Commission and Council. Notice of the hearings shall be given pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.52(Hearings and Appeals). tv_ss 5191 SPECIFIC PLANS-19.64 19.64.050 COMMISSION ACTION ON SPECIFIC PLANS The Commission shall make a written recommendation on the proposed Specific Plan whether to approve, approve in modified form or disapprove,based upon the findings contained in Section 19.64.070. Commission action recommending that the proposed Specific Plan be approved, ap- proved in modified form,or denied shall be considered by the Council following Com- mission action. 19.64.060 COUNCIL ACTION ON SPECIFIC PLANS Upon receipt of the Commission's recommendation, the Council may approve,approve with modifications, or disapprove the proposed Specific Plan based upon the findings contained in Section 19.64.070. Prior to Council action,all land within the scope of the Specific Plan shall be incorporated within the City. 19.64.070 FINDINGS A Specific Plan may be adopted only if all of the following findings are made: 1. The proposed plan is consistent with the General Plan; 2 The proposed plan would not be detrimental to the public interest,health, safety, convenience,or welfare of the City; 3. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested,land use designa- tion(s) and the anticipated land use development(s); 4. The proposed plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neigh- borhood; and 5. The proposed plan will contribute to a balance of land uses so that local residents may work and shop in the community in which they live. 19.64.080 SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY No public works project, tentative map or parcel map,or other land use entitlement may be approved, adopted or amended within an area covered by a Specific Plan,un- less found consistent with the adopted Specific Plan. N-56 5191 n n WARNER W. I�LJItJILJI�� HO G H R R ROW A SM NGS O OFFICE BOX 2W SN BEMA pINO.C A 92W (714)ee1a1547 T}]P.COPY: (T 14)ttf-9961 April 21, 1994 Mr. Roger Hardgrave Director of Public Works and City Engineer City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418-0001 RE: City Planning Agenda April 4, 1994 Stubblefield Items 35 and 36 City Creek Canyon Scenic Highway April 4, 1994 Report by RSA, For: Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Route(s) (Access Road) Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property, and Stubblefield un-permitted Massive Grading and Bulldozing of Large Trees and Stumps therefrom and dumped into the City Creek Streambed(causing Downstream Hazard) City Administrator Shauna Clark's Clarification of Department of Engineering Response to: Stubblefield un-permitted City Development Code Violations 20 acre property/City Creek Canyon Dear Mr. Hardgrave: Thank you for your time with me on Monday April 11, 1994 relative to review of my Public Health and Safety April 4, 1994 Report which was submitted to the Mayor and Common Council on April 4, 1994 and titled: City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements East/West Rt. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police • Fire • Emergency • Recreation Trails Walking - Jogging - Bicycle - Equestrian (For Reference: See attached April 4, 1994 Report Front Cover and Partial contents of: Planning Director Recommendations,Schematic Engineering Plan(s),City Creek Massive Grading/Bulldozing) The Report included, but not limited to, Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) for east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon Stubblefield 20 acre property Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Routes (Access Roads), Photolog of Stubblefield un-permitted massive grading and bulldozing of boulders, debris, material, large trees and stumps directly into the City Creek Streambed by June 1992. This has caused a serious DOWNSTREAM HAZARD to Public/Private facilities, i.e.: SBCT&FCG, EVWD, Caltrans, RSA and existing homes east of the City Creek levy. HERITAGE OF THE MOUNTABVS AND VALLEY BEGAN W IR50 (� OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 2W.AiIAOWHEAD SPRCVGS,SAN BERNARDBJO.CALWRNIA 92M RESIDENCE MAM NG-3295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERN WO,CAIRORNIA 92I ,(714)1111M A V ABNEB V.NOMWN QD iAMLLY C0.pN ANRIATE r Page 2 Stubblefield Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Road(s): Public Health and Safety: Enclosed is my April 19, 1994 letter to Mr. Guy Burdick, Fire Marshall which fully addressed the April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) covering the East/West Rt. 330 Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Roads (Access roads) to serve Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon Property. This would through a Multi-Plate underpass for: Police, Fire, Emergency, Recreation Trails (walking,jogging, bicycle, equestrian). (For Reference:See April 19,1994 Warner Hodgdon letter to Guy Burdick,Fire Marshall RE:Stubblefield Two Different Feasible Full-Standard Road(s)) Multi-Plate Underpass for: Police • Fire • Emergency • Recreation Trails As you know, the Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) were prepared for the April 4, 1994 Report by W.J. McKeever Engineering who is also Stubblefield's Mountain Shadows Engineer. A City Full-Standard width Multi-Plate Underpass is not unusual or a mystery to the Department of Planning. Building Safety and Code Enforcement City Fire or the Engineering Department. The Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement, Fire and Department of Engineering preferred this for RSA-Secret Hollow Ranch (Woodland Heights), via 122/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue(60' R/W and 40' paving). The 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary access was re-evaluated, re- confirmed, established and approved by the DERC, Planning Commission and City Council by May 24, 1993. The State office of Planning and Research effective date thereof was July 3, 1993. There was no concern by the City. Planning. Fire or Engineering as to how much the City Full Standard Width and Hecht Multi-Plate Underpass (Arch Ptpe Culvert) would cost RSA for Public Health and Safety. In addition, RSA volunteered to share $400 thousand of the 1/22/86 Dedicated Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Improvement/Maintenance District Cost. Stubblefield un-permitted City Creek Downstream Hazards caused by: Massive Grading/Bulldozing, large trees and stumps and dumped into the Streambed: At our meeting I provided you the applicable comprehensive full photolog of the Stubblefield massive grading, bulldozing and infrastructure construction (Small Canyon pipeline/roads) covering the east/west Rt. 330 City Creek and Small Canyon area(s) by June 1992. These had been submitted to the Mayor and Common Council on March 22, ,y 1993 and again re-submitted to the DERC/Planning staff on August 26, 1993 regarding the July 15, 1991 Stubblefield: (1) 283 acre City Initiated Amendment to the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan, (2) Rt. 330 Fill-Material sale to Caltrans/Contractor, (3) March 22, 1993 50 year Development Agreement and (4) March 26, 1993 Planning Applications. • HERBAGE OF THE MOUNTARS AND VAIJEY BEGAN Q!1650 OFIEADQUA0.TEIl5:POST OFFICE BOX 21".ARROWHEAD SERD -SAN BEMN WO,GllFOR 91 08 RESIDENCE MAFMG:5295 BROADMOOR BOUIEVARD,SAN BERNARDWO,cAUFO...(9141883-0153 WW A V/.RNEA<.MOOT . 1—__AFiIIIAiE Page 3 On July 15, 1991 the Council Directed the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement to process the City Initiated Amendment to the July 3, 1989 updated City General Plan/FEIR for Stubblefield property 766%± Density Increase. On March 22, 1993 the Council Directed the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement to process environmental review of the east/west Rt. 330 City/Stubblefield/Caltrans 50 year Development Agreement and to investigate the east/west Rt. 330 Sub-Standard access City liability cost to City Full-Standard(s). City Engineering Department Not-Informed of Stubblefield un-permitted action(s): When we met you were completely unaware and not informed of, but not limited to, the east/west Rt. 330 Stubblefield OFF-SITE Massive Grading/Bulldozing, etc., removal of large trees and stumps ON-SITE and the dumping thereof over the cliffs into ` the City Creek Streambed. You had never previously seen the On-the-Scene photologs taken through June 1992 and previously provided on March 22, 1993 and August 26, 1993 to the Mayor/Council, City Attorney's Office and Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement. The photolog of the Stubblefield on- boulders, debric large trees and stumps dumped into City Creek identified the exisfing_DOWNSTREAM HAZARDS we discussed. City Administrator April 4, 1994 clarification to the Mayor/Council RE: Stubblefield un-permitted Massive Grading/Bulldozing, Large trees and stumps removal and Downstream Hazards: Following my comments to the Council and Staff on April 4, 1994 City Administrator Shauna Clark commented to the Council as to her knowledge of the east Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Stubblefield un-permitted Massive Grading and Bulldozing. She ratified to the Council that I had addressed this to her several months previously and that she had requested the Engineering Department to do an ON-SITE review of the east Rt. 330 Stubblefield 20 acre property. Ms. Clark stated that the Engineering Department reported back that they observing no Massive Grading, Bulldozing,removal of large trees and stumps etc. I was not disturbed at Ms. Clark's remarks as I believed she was relating what she had been informed before and then by others, However, at the end of the Stubblefield Agenda Item(s) 35 and 36 public comment period I provided the Administrator a copy of my applicable April 4, 1994 Report I had just previously submitted to the Mayor and Council, Director of Planning and Building Services and Code Enforcement, Deputy City Attorney and City Clerk. I then pointed out to Ms. Clark her therein the On-the- Scene photologs in which the Stubblefield D-9 Bulldozer and Heavy Loader were actually in the act of causing the Downstream Hazards by massive grading and bulldozing directly into the City Creek Streambed. I clarified to Administrator Clark that Stubblefield had left nothing ON-SITE to be observed as the 20 acre property had been completely re-graded by June 1992 like the carpet on the City Hall floor. HERITAGE OF THE MOUNT AND VALLEY BEGAN 861950 (� OHEADQUARTERS:9 OF BO%3116,ARROWHEAD S9RPIGS.SAN BERNA WO.CAIhCMFRA 93106 W R DENQ MA G:3395 RROADMOOR BOULEVARD.SAN RERNARDDIO.G5IRORNIA 93106,(T11 SSM153 WW y AmARNEA m.NO.N F. yQ01 Ai F4 n Page 4 Concealed Political Boldness: Therefore, I further clarified to Ms. Clark that after two years later it was logical that the Department of Engineering in early 1994 would observe no such un-permitted activity left ON-SITE. The Stubblefield Massive Grading and Bulldozing had been timed in approximately May 1992 to coincide with the contiguous Rt. 330 Freeway construction by Caltrans/Contractor and the Wal-Mart Development. Stubblefield then simultaneously bulldozed everything OFF-SITE of their 20 acre property and dumped it over the cliffs into the City Creek Streambed 100± feet below. Two years of growth has further disguised this hidden un-permitted activity from ON-SITE review of the Department of Engineering. No one let alone the Engineering, Department, would ever perceive of the concealed political boldness of this act. The City and EDA has recently paid $1.3 Million for Wal-Mart/Stubblefreld Highland Avenue Improvements. This included, providing the Small Canyon Storm Drain with curb/gutter/paving ($400 ± thousand) fronting Stubblefield Highland Avenue property. Even the City of Highland refused to participate in the Small Canyon Storm Drain cost through their jurisdiction or by Reimbursement Agreement to the City of San Bernardino. As they believe it was the responsibility of the upstream development(s) (Stubblefield). I understand there is now an added current issue for another CiIyJEDA $160± thousand to underground Wal-Mart/Stubblefield Highland Avenue Power Lines. Certainly the Wal-Mart Development Agreement as structured and dealt with is an interesting document as to City/EDA/IVDA Impact Cost/Loss. My concern has no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. The City is facing rampant blight and decay and we strongly believe in equal Public Health and Welfare with City Development Code Full-Standards for the longterm socio/economic benefit of the Citizenry. San Bernardino deserves City Full-Standard Streets ... Too. Respectfully, -u� tw '4J Warner W. Hodgdon HEWAGE OF THE MOUNFA MD VALLEY BEGAN W 1850 OHEADQUARTERS:POSE OFFICE BOX n",ARROMSEAD SPRD -SAN BERNA Wo,CALD'ORNIA 92b IT RESIDENCE MAR3NG:3"S BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNA NO,CAIJ£ORNIA 92 W,(714)8810153 A VAR Rm.110IXAON QD iA _—AiFIIIAIE ��■. i W W Q w 0000 ° c we F ? o i �' a � M A in ' w �z W w cy a wQOI aE-+ V uo in in a Oy � w w W �� ,.. ,Q V1 C4v 4 3 n Wl N ao ` , 7, u � ' aH Uw o S o 5 o A IZ en w f� us 6» 6A us y W rl rn I • �q w F .w.l 7y UU _ !� A U M st t6-Z-►�g MIV'IVINI S3'1 No sn� 1 I ' f " C wW 6 Lzl �[O�,�,a++�•i"�NOLI.VNV'S Q\N M- 13{331 _ i O `•.I O ,, M � az { a I1 , � �w-62arvi�sw OP was � I �►'-" 3P l� � � � c�, � FBI QWa w' U � SAC o� ; ••. 8+� CZ � \ 1 ~~ i > 3 cm Orlo 1' • � �'oa a II�„yII _ h UU D • 1i r t A G t � ¢ • � � tS x (n c ,^ k ' { S Fly � W 0 u H � �/w� 00 w R (�r\� ° M • 3 Y"�µ � W {f WU ha � w w U O d C ENO 8 8 i 4 W V1 0 E ° a C Gn LnaC �. w e A w LL r G : Tn O A � � A � � w 1� ee a 4- W v Oq � s V �H�pm ��sg�g=�.goAo r N pp 2 $ O Q Z y 0 iNA»�qa � �im2= F�1 � € O 0 Esfi � gs� RR U ? U G 2H a1'a SBa' $3g8�" erm3 t U�g� leg' n �•«N � � � 2gE S—C Eu° IA m T/1 "Sao � fx s` :blL_ r x e N u a m V J Wi V t V#m m= E c NL a <Y q Ea �9E uj cr �y Emil o5P ffi� q t F Q c � u a _ c y :• 3m o N x £ o E C� z l S U A x'F �Syg E^� r' yy £# m ICI U 3 .:,t 3 .. W 4 e c E¢T.p ro O Tn Zoe° vg u� E gE a aS$ I IIi e f : 10 1 I / , ,.fFai !di It - iiil a ! I 1 y 40 e O F / � iiaial iiii i a alai a i l i2 : , i �i I i 1 � � . • _ '! �� � ••yi it I �{ ( ��'% gp�F a ° � 1 '� � I � � � 111i ' ,�ti "♦ �4 I N YI ?€ �SE;j�6� ¢ r= iic II III1 111111 1 1 1 � . ? I. a ¢ X1i1 ! II � ' � � �I � � � 111 ! ! li � •. �r •,."s ��pl� � pc @r2q�gi / ¢ w / JOOR©o ' © o0o w a p F f4• J! Ile i o f s4_ �i7 a u P55 / i = E ri ij'i _ .r•r 3� -�� i:;l^i I I o a ryl ,i li;wl w � e I {'• / °ES lylaf iii!1 !;!:I;! 'T•'• t ; � 5 .1't I� L, , i r�pa R' to ial4 fi fi iE s °O C i '-� �61Z � ' �e K i li aIFE T4E ltiji � I I izyciv. �nilSiE�! /IWo� r F { m `i ` o,•�' t? pi4.t:lrir I If! V 'vim � I f! a 5! ?F !\, S 4a+,E w° .� .' �� 'I r •�dI CF. 19 ; r I 566 �/I � Ly € ]��G���� F 5 f I! • ��� ti , � :r I! 1,.'�r I I 17 ntl. •I_.�pa �r9 ..i? I. ;E ��,��3� +1. , � , }I SJ ti � �:�. �� � �•. I 9 ii�ia Lt�l rl "I @I 4 i i �\ n�: it V 5i a a ' /, IR �(�� • . ni . I �aJIWS " z®° 9 p'' t o &i f l ,r!! f ti:✓ 7 i I Y' � I i !' I,1 T> -jf rfl , I it I I i 1 111 I I Oa ms l ' i '�''i " �F „ ' fi .Ir.•E.:!III II'11 rnl b • 1 ip i E fSSl i:i{{i.t p a \' E I m i_ilip'l i f h I IIi 11 f l ! . I I 1 •ilii�,PI I ti l r a• Ow s 1 I, � �• \ f t ? a ib i r fl 3 , �.I illi ll. il'',pf�lll�I K 'ai me f 1�� — 1 °�♦ r � � �! � *` r'.II Igl�i;�!���I,!f I�I�lal`I I 1 �, I �pQ . +�� ' ff1 I ?., 1� i � I� I z ;S bIIP'Ifmu;ipgril;lill �• F Vi fE I W I �� f r , �/ c{ 11 II eilirlll'�r93 f I Cll���t��� ! i E 4i , . � � i I W : 4 rill a !— C.i tiz i �I , w Iig�4 f , f .I f�i 711 111(- J. 1 = -)) •'EI-} � 1°'�;ll yt I.�1; � • , ' ' ii � rll� - „ �II f[I f!I� y.,.! ur..n. �' !/ '- ' g f li i vi m� i -� ,� Ift .�E 4 E IEI ...111,1 C I I II�� .11 .•.I a,! I It�1 .ilil! 6aap'�' E � di ss OI z i • i, f I •_ !..I I E i f I .I! isi ;f I II �! i :9, u I. a=i -.. '1 i!i ii I6.tf � iI : i ! � LUES iiE l•1 {il , SL a W' s� ' y N a a z y cA a" Z z tt do "y e W W , d � hoti EEO " d q ' d F, nA hMVy h W z r v 2 > u d o d N A O a *= ca �7 H UiL r.? C4 . 1G r C .o aj q =4) W F a m � � W ; ^• c E � �« , •� o W u c WE y C p u > d O ra � h9 `c E or c «04 OU > Woe _° Wen A a U _ Z y A 0 U � 3o UN E W O N s 0. V �'.7 � CN h V A A `u � M t c u> con w ca _ oc ° — W 'mil y N C L. c t• y y. 9 °' o as onuou 'CO. _ _ � @ , o L r d N U � a o0 o aU � �U A `• ` d 0 ;5 a c q A `o o- a :y c ecr q a�.t ;v ac• H W .0 cc Eq C ON ° U c r u ctj4 o Mc `" Oeyo ° O c a U z u o � 3 •o F F U N -• � EU 'DO EU ° A E m A U m EM c cwro `...� do E deaQ j uc 11,14 'u- U � � w L 7 W V] V] Ci C/1 7 Q •-� N •� a \ A. m A /! A. f LL § \ \ 8{ . ! 0 m ! � � ! z § § t 9 ` z � k LL. | ƒ � ( ° k § � ( § 2§ >, mk ; fu 22 ® vK =q g\ k (} « | g \ • , 4 \ � 2 §�§ = r! !, eb0 / bag § | §) R ' • | , . � Z � \/ \ # J � � / E & ® ®/ ` \ ! % � � 0 o` $55q5q � Z && A a a �, 88B 09g� mS '� � $a 5 9imu9dvc cc O LL W m� R @v W °yg ge29 ° .2tr1 E t 3 ga �Y } JR'" gyp " < a $ adLL n`pp ay Q 6 s u '4G - cc y Z > k�< F. .r t7 �8{ �55 ¢$$y'yp 84G < �S a¢9yw5y$Q fjSy LL {n fi9 " g� ag O .�6 15 S5 So6p ^ BE glgv� pl6 O Sq+ 8`o'� 29 W Ep 8C Ey. U pp. E a� g0 g$bh a4 z RIO 56E T Z O z a ogSs6 z gg n 6u S< gm 5 5 E r 12 1 g d R «c777 8 ) ; . | {! ka 0 | § ! ) ( , E_ - ) 2 ! E 0 0 , : - ® ! . : \ \ ): /a \¥) \\ r a{)) § ( :2 m ai ) ) (\ w >)d ( � j )c _ \/ 'i/ - ! `\ ` ! _k � * jk } j - \ƒ\/! _ - ! § ; e § ; k2 ! , E � - f - § 2 • � | " } ) \ \ {k / �} / f ) \ , 0W a y 0 , ; A § kf\ k ( | f ) \k \\ }§ § ( k k \ \ \ Mu } ; ) ` \ {. Z \ �- } �| ) ! { !$ ` ! § \ - - } E ({ ) \ 0 J § ! ` ! 7 c- m . - - - r ` ){ - _ Zf $ ! ! [ § jf ! Mw- - OE (k ! ® • � \ §) i ! » f ) !% | t{ ! !§ §! \¥ 0 ] { : ' W" ! | 4 0 ) k ) ( c ® 0 9 \ G \ - - {� E � k ( {/ [ $ { ( | \ ,k =G m ! \ ; � , | , ; 2 ! ,i! !, ! ; k /® k /{ f ` ! 2t - „ \ �/ ( \` k ) / \ &® ` k kk � \ ` � � E � . ` §k) 1 y 1 1 O 9G04 40 V, ••O Y Y 1 000 OY 44 y■Y YN qC Ntl •VN 1 TV C A •�. '•1 6 C✓ O a '� ` 1 AxM � 'qj �p0 Tq Obq a0 O N Y 1 Y~W Q•m H V i xY9 OpMY O a lyl C SO I "IY MNY OA9 P.aiSM � 00 1 00 m O m Y O ^I O M M M qi1 �L q EM p N ti I 6L� fudm „ NY MC UY am F. 1 u y W Y ~ Y g T M O •� O G 1 M E Y L 'Si YMC b 4> P a I d~4 qCY Ya NMY� b NO � a Zp C W 1 YW'Qd (V ln� wYY YW OH~ ~ y p' C O Y M L'•Iw .4,44 Y40'WN OV O G M C W I TOU Y y L U W •AI Y T 1 4gal 0 M U YYw Cy N4 T Y 4• m A Y ..01 1 CwY qLY 0, 0 tiL'0YA .0 W W M MY I V x F 'dY yqN •4Y yM O a 9 I 5m O q b YYM aC p � d I WU'1 O u '4' w �N m,_Iwey ad Say 4 S I OU q Y"IW xq Y0+1 q NO Y y • I O .0 Y N 1 i S C Y N S Y p Y P P N o•• 1 1 1 I w Yi Y AS '"N N YH b G S UM,xd tlg N q M 'm M L C rLL O p a UU 0 a CY 1 W0 AN aM PO a U bH q 0. C y p M Y M 9 C Y EGG EU O C 1 A yT C Y N F 1 N „ .pQ^y w T9 4• a Y q'O L P 0 Y 0 woo "0 s H U U C Y N 0 I Y y 6 A Y .ei C lj p ; W E p0 KIT A O y 1 My W aV YO• RPAOm AH O•CY d tl `N�yV• d q Y M r' q Ye N UQ(A 4 GU N! 1 W 1 y mY O pC"Im q Vya 'pp p'•1 O _ y s 9 m 1 YVLU 4 'JmY qH Iq Y41 40 U iYtip .0, A Vrwe oaotl Y 3 1 Y.n = o p M qM O CYYUC o My,M S i •• M W 9 O d N O m M F 1 00 H N 40 OYW N YgYUO YOC W •• Imp-1 i pp Yq Fwa SWLO o 4. n 4S0 C^' of po y LJ 1 q V C YM 0 mN e $Lp w 09 O N a Oh N-O OR yq Y O Y+1 m a U a m T q a m U q C q ay e ° qe yyg 4 d M660E Y C 4 O U 4 MW 4iY � WmM C q A O.O p W UY byM T H q O go U WM4 w Y 00 0> q V � ! pM Y 0y0' 2 CY U O.00 O y1 U 4. Uo 4YGN '!.1 S0 m OpN 0 OOCi a T0 rv1 ay 0B B. 10 9 W TN ry Y q p M DMgI Ftl MM.S VOY M b OyG 'J O Cy o § §/ • 3 . ! 5 ; Us 0 � . .3 § � Us ! .2 \ @ § } § ) ; | \ § © } £ ` 0 \ )k G Q/ /\ 4; a e G 22E \ — § ( )§ _/ /G > j � k zz j � z � Q| / � § \ q 9 ; 4 » �S2 9®`! = z ■ Dix Sawa ! § | 2 ; } Jy« J» sb V LL 0 03 § q ! ( pyap § § mw zo § 00-w E55 ` R ^ =/! 2 ■ f ! � � § | � § Z2 k \2/! // / : ) /\ \ : /l ` 44 ®® ! 3 � 0 0 } 9 © X § \ (ƒƒ ! S /� §6d/ § z O py gg U N I Q 5 J 9 84 9 B H A' S 'S o; , z �y39' n' CG Sao g c U cr z; o. a S e y &a � = d w o a 55 _ y 0 EI Em W ¢ b � -R E° 9 g'� 3 o E DDD Q yE p 9 9 9 d N > �p7 U Sp g O Ef O cc a iS E �j`=c e aq 5e g bw cr W 1a AEA ?o.R� 0 Ay Ma t a D n b 7 a 5 6 c `J co !A F v � � pG —u = 9 a w. LL h a F.�S 8aE5 � m � 5 � 25 �Sa �a Y U ' ggCO `o E 'a A E °a °ne E tlD o n 5 ° E .sn O E < I n 9 '^ o z % E �LG 5 a S S E < m E E n a r 00 < E y O z a u7 r 3 E yE 2 S q si py E n O Sy �o u5E �' � e�' eppgY f aj R •� 9 0 n- g'x OU °o O Cg O e pyt}ea S pp < < • A W e d � v `e r N r/!1 w � a a � wj Zd • A 7 Z � u ►'�1 W � 0 QI _ G 1'I W Imo' 8 z o c C Wa 2 h z � zb M 00 a v Q iS. 0�0 t � r W x � � a d v M d M (4f, p� W W o x M .� M d i M C M 7� a � 0 � a � ww wa F-� VIII. III N r _ - �Vj - ��m ,is I 7 V pl � ttt r•Ees.� I ({.�iis p �i t • 11 1111 j • 11 Idb�-4 IM y 1j Ism 1111��i•viii I _ - ' ;��►�i/iii �\110 _ .1111111 �iI/IIII� f�,,�1 C yea�r � " 1 `i. �I ����� •��� _ OPMV Hem IF -11 W41 Ell u A ° C U z c y" u m 0 Cd IRE u 02 wu sae ljL '111)".4 1. _ (! _ rv� 7�f' '�1�3f� r � - �� •� � 4 4j �q{ � W lea ib 4, C 5 O AOIig a � a C7 �r r TTT 4 ,1: i /r r - a ;xi l � a wW ' r � • a All. r _ , 1, 1 .. �� 1 I Kt r C4a FL �• .S ai OR z t J U b � � U ��1 w 03 r Y. z W J Id U AZ jig o g W �< � Z y o w � U ° a 3 a a10 �o \ § | § (}( U�W \ § §§ / u lu B � � z § E { ) 22))§ k 191® ! § E R ). ' f { W5 K) u k |� � jrA cm§ / O§ \ --n § k( § E 2°) . § * - 7§I gal 22 . law F Ln ci E T d � a`oa � e E u a ' s u E O M� rzj az E � 6U FR o vi r~ E t: co EEA w 7 3 as o •`- � = % da°, c u U N pT. v o• �, • Uw eoa a wO ZV o � Q V Ev ° N ° m a E d on w AA yR � . v of c aE C zz '+rA U w C U y W y u O4 C !:, y T •h d y Cn V A M ..� .a „ � , do Ln ^� yy U 3r y ca y ? o u ° v a M w � W o� u z 3 z � R h d � E 9y � a MCI F p as E d o E H W W wa "M E ° A .. dF U E a = a y W z pU0 >M c cw » U AE" zW v, x a, _ .,v,U .,w w N Q W UA •� �� �Q' /� i a H d A s rn v� o dz Ao�. Ez � w � e Aa W QC7 nE 1l� w t W �dco ¢ a yAU � 1 } , o Q e. •Y e• G �, +Z o � v7po rte. L� 3 • '~ I EW u E I : v�i � e� 0.1UFw4 j ' /_ ly 0 =wa wA ? / d • > I � aU �nw • / D i .{ yyYY yy yypp.....11111 CCCCC pppppp Apo �� py� ° gym q� qy a 5a N � ms0 .6 H � qyG q6 �PJ.�a9! aMY y0NvY frpg tlSNp .I N •�n �p@tl ��� �M�44u Vyyy1[p. p� Mggqmq SIN a�J.�.iia qC p +l AaA �H N., q UO�0.MM �mVI Wp �^ 9�MgQw Od O Lup Ap V iN yyyqyy9$Nmi �Ip A e upmmG pp 00 q MF^ m`� 0 ;^Y L•i ' �O 4yy���rgq q�pY yGm .1� qP� _ y N� a A� Cy�U 6 9'i mq9 yH�o•. * ° ppyyF..H Ym qO q9 �qq 'y iiJyll J� y ym �yH{ gYML {yyy� W �Hg Cy M ^p QE .� {pN� ids O y9 yC0 �^�]pymM pW 'gtlqq� pYry MW NpqYyy+yl pg YY�Np� �CUW y`5 . 19�q• 0 �9y �Dt $$�UO�.Oi.1b�Ab 0 �'p p �WMV��✓ 3'G°° 5�u9.�iy spyp SSgo�o3ymSaB u£ m yy� pppgSpp$ �pL � H pOp..'q C'G pap ri A'r.� hh�inA ~ pNp�Yp � blm9�Vd qy mm 89 ?� pOASOM umm G0.UA 4��NY.H-�9�U' M Sm �AO�H�N �W � 9 �3 °ioH.mi� °y' a �y55g55 9 � y2 2 ° app o °°tm ��]��.Pi u° q yC Om $Z M Oq p O . 90, uo ° yu'� y11 �,yS �5y�y� � pu L'$1j Yi0 tl � _ q M HY qO p.2jj:5L fJ �I[yp� M 0W5 �j Y � � y¶96 �VI Ma 5a Ye q H o $ 1 Yq ° mU pMWWpp pa e �^iAl3� �^g Y OpYBp � MIN H'.tym$MX W pY FUY S m m g� MM'27q� U m mgm ,� C�° ,�° rA �� '" rya 8Yd 9p 'aayo OM 9 0 S U' yq Yp �At '.i U� M¢ [ppp� pN� � i�i � ��� � •a kYf ; N . 8Ya � � g9t�p1OnMApHq tlgC dCpC tl�.. �M BM ppp11 {y� 9� eVAUVp �AAp O � 4.. CAUA UAi�� UAO �jmU n�� �y ��n m P O • d n S A Z G Y q � n d t7 C57 Q�3� • °how A �� ® � '�. �• � .. �- .t.... ' J •. vV I � i � a a Q 093 E in PH 11 H �N � � � `✓� ... i t! f i1 4 - i G � yyTY OCM� A AM ✓ vld 9 ASS5" J wp N MY 4q L^yy� Y 3C pp�� m -.q 0 p 9q� N q�. .Jj CUU AZ p H .Z°NyMYO yC Yq p C NN nP 0 MOYH NO ONY dd q °N X U✓ H Pv V6'UiGN ✓ LY Y "uq 5mM °yY9 3w o X5 5 "A0 i Y 0 ° d m �i m 'm ° 0nm ilw5 o q.$ � .�'o » pW _ 9�m i. VyOMNO L'qN SC QyQ M.Ni pyUp�U qyqUy N yy ° yYy��p�p4 YCy U �OCU 4�yy.00 YV M u �L2L G a YGgdC4W M H �A ydp tY H WU9Ny YY M � °y d0 U n L,T Y pN"N'��U$J M3d yyyUU C8O555^O4p q'�M°88yy3 0 90 N ✓Am 0Y,wYYOCT°i Y P A 0N�0'`piY..9 NXy jO..i qNq g <g m u pWp.�P����n�p&€iSpC�O[¢gZyj yM6 U O n oo y N q TC UI y N 4Cq(CO>'~o Oqq Y MN yyq 9A.YdQ0CFi A G N N q qy �✓Y; Y O U Im UM GG °Uqn w SS TO Kj0 A • 0 0 H qH Y d a z °50 AAilON ° 20 0 U Y •O b �1 Y° �am�.Y fqqY°pp p 1�QQYa Y P m n i X•.,V YCO9 9 Y�TOr■iw j f b HNEyY Mtl Up;m yqNq;'y✓vn i �ua�NYPO Fy iNAyR�NU�GY q L u% �NUNUWl 2W e oN YYp tgU�J'A �VYm�M5OJ5qL tl p✓Ny�C 9 Mi YUmv qIQoN sG a o U pU OS Gg OLOGN O a °y OFmN" q N �X ° 0 � W°N �MC N GY O U A Z 0 pN M9ql° G Y T� U CyZ y O p ppp ° M M � O✓ C J� WY9 A UpO O A 'a 0 UL U Y Y gq J A p p MOGY Y gM i Y NU ]N V N .5'GYd^VNN Y ° N� YOU ✓ T✓ V �S 2 N gYNA oc " T 9 �� a YmuA N:7 °Mp YJPoQ■Aqq pY.✓9 G..�OO,�.�O M.m1 I.N S gm m 1 O Jq y✓pU!y M gY M m O d yC Y✓�pmOp{J09 p{9p���_N p�nnZu4aa�°0 C Y G mq i u°✓Vti Y VN N pp N9mYp tl OY Oyy2y Y ACC O0°pM✓e U oM 6 Y pp g ®J NA�q3Y4TY'�p�✓A ipp G>'., ..q U.°i� TY.00°gAI N✓t Y5g M C ON yY NC"dH°y N N gy.M�p UOi Gq U MU YA�A g M�ic°p'^V�1 tl;A(Q Y Y}y' N Omm a P NNQ0✓YmN9 WU✓stl°p�A YS�YsYU 'V°YEYEm vb1YA H c 04 NOV y .aNy Y5 0 yoON YNOC yU�YY C$9�~q 0ANq'y 3y8 AY�y Y!�9YM�tlYypOY Nd j a m°A Y 0.6A YY u_w Y'i C O YEq .�y N.9 O.. �N y0 v U Y ✓ Ye2Y C �dZ AN F. i i 0 C S ! CNOpY ✓ C o y M029 Zv o 0 W AY✓ y4 C N p 0 wO % O S N C y mo , Y0A ryNp Y m HN EgS S 12 g 9g. ' %8l 21woZ go MOM Y C". TT �_, �%%ttt��NqM A> mCOS F mpyy0.N i i4.% N U N Y W NVN aC0�gp 1 yYT°'V.N°N i yOCN�Y CA!�{ �y99g;H m S�CT NLAYO9Am Y�0 Y 0.Q yyCC N UU yM .00. WOTOd F ✓LAyy yN 0 SNYiti S m>>yy tl 5A 10 JYA`0 NO�0 Ja Y"lA�.HO�At9O C Y u c0 A V S A AqUdN mVA` N U U 0 % NVO' C m� 0 Y nV l ?~ upM ~G9eS ✓ �0yp 9 yUN NUwymyY Z °y qq 5 0YY0.Ayy BYE gqYY5 YNH OVX m P 0 U M m 9 pmA n ° Y°OS 0 Z T � YO GY 'JM MO UA m > O �'N 6 ✓ �Yw gVYY� P ON Yy9QAyPM GGYm (((yyy y "�+�✓ 3 m �+P U �•+ O P F Y N �aY �✓ m d Y S OtlM �yy� tlm 5 ° OYm tlCg �m� �q;m °yyyyypp, o� W .pNp Y9 NyN M Y uw✓m ONn01U0q0MICA YM_ WN A W009 a ° %YYYY m10�Af�A 4 woo IB WMNv%d6 A9 U U O 0 m MO W 1 w MNM) n CN' q qW O OWpN U y wtl GU U O mY YYYa tlCm y 0. ss..y Nry yH m Y 2 N ° M N•1 0 °° 0 Voo ee d w +e.t0-0 y qys .a. Pco N d Yg N qa✓q ;W vo O CU YY a m +O Y�qq✓m wm �� E G V" �Y yOU°i .VOG cI•..U0"IiU O y C qOL q 0 ✓ . a -0 a d90 mo Ny O a o m 9 m n A ya, NUY UGEE C; MUC Ym+1Y N rGV 9i d a m . q 0 N C 2 q Y.OIl�m y N A 4 jy g ,�tl O Oym � UN 4RPV� 4 O4 p q qP�p U >q�Y I Z�0 O t m C ✓ +w0✓O M J` O yO a�®y.V yC0a�^j q.Y p pp q 0 M tlYM Y OM w.lJ TNYUjUIN000 YYN Y O m tl✓C YGG fi'ti '9Ca C� .8L MVq✓<U u C 0m ✓ C >y.. ON ly•J� P.my�g,Oy.aF y i O mqU YC Y ~l MGU V2'Y+MgO E 1M�h A a A mUU O N 0 Y p .m4 OV .0 - 2 s ✓SO ; ✓ ✓0 0°� 0 0 . 00 p M V C tl d O C p C .y q 00 0 .0 ✓U O 0 w O 0 p 0 T ON Nm G yN.yy d O L a a A V I qm I �y V NI �P:mq:.~V 0m 1 YG'PIbNN +aAqq�V Ggg.yG0 i1"Q>U qq, i Y Y.L 1 Na."Yi� N C =L�Am�yU'J.M✓tl lm• a PY OC UO m CP U NC Y O0'0 0 C m dA OGG m )O 4 ❑Y m�dv P ti $M~~Ay i n m O 4cU tl.r0PI 1 HtyO�q.N c.o N I ✓VO Yqm, 0 O G0 N.UP w OM q YO N qN F.• V.v tl m mC m K<�3 q A U 9 m w P tl .1 ry OMGp >'I Ew • x Fa u. d ti4 Fw 1 �. A xi , ao z i w ` or sA, w �r � r ilill r r r c k a A YMy yy wV '4 � G . �M `� d�• Y1. .t j. •i\ � }. � 'j" .Y .�. i Y �4 ar^ y S a ryy 4 Yak Y. b ?. � ys� ,r�,• ark 'r 'j �} �.1�'} �,. i*. a �" $ r p \ C3 \ t t ggg !V u.. 4 ♦ .z c I k� � ) r x � ... y� �• [� �A 4 p M�s{'M,�y l��e ^t�} E 'L'� .E ,mss;• s � �v Il. Yy�,H� rA ^ F 1 • i'e y � u� jz TH • 'n i r � .y S a C 3 Mmk ' �9 ma I e r r ' • y4'# ,�, � .' Q V • E a l V L d ri y A E w u w � oq Q $U • o u u � d V m • ° W ;,u V L�Q w u y o ° E a, 1 v m W O • 'e �m M�h a Wy die pyM C CM w'c fx C w 94 MQa ag- �Sro w par . AUy o h C v L d a A r • tlZE R V SR t � o x i ` U � # n c u h o. c r9itf, �z °ij a� a �c ac PI IWO w�a za f xz ^ « ii yV imum. a 5 2 R. it £, _ • • �� A W • � N O 9.NJ F C .L. R p��+ • � L U� y+'tia+ Ut° 9 O� >>�i� • V ti M V T Q� Lti am s hw a � � �� �� o' A � w`� 6�' C W „ E �_� � a c E E¢ � � a� C�, Ty v 'd V A'O N F00� x+�� y � =U w d a s , .,..:. , �,r�.;� . .. . r .. .,.. � � .$ �� � , � r � [ i{�`�' p C i Y.. .., �✓� � .... r y tai .. r ,�- ...... ,. . . .. p... . .. a a T W V� ❑ Y 5{ Q a G W � app4 y yn •��: EC7 r w Va j% �oi V T L h �F y++ • r1;s s� is ch m E L � N i E 0 �y dw .T. v � y u Q 9 N aD0 ut p T L W c a 8 1 s't• I k x� , 44 S , �a t A 4P t f p 4 y 5r r� is # t y 3�z k. wrY�}sr P'3aS� �2a "f, st4 m bi r E ues 'a v x �iA qy y, J N i yr r # r J b k"in T r+ H y r e wW d 7 b' �' �t r d' 4 w .�>♦ q{ N 0A 4 Y ` ;, y 7t Y+ b 'M1 ku ry d qg�+ u 1 9 w 4f, dt ?w J., e e :r � . » % .� { e � � � � / ® � � \^ \\ � e � 2 � . / \ � � � /�� \ � � � � � � � � � \ \\ . < � ■ ! § } | \) !! ' . \\ � � )\ e � - . ±y. : \ 2�\«� � � e � � y �� ° �, � \ � , • d 7 � t -• M F h a v it d C • 4 W 4 W n n l VL O �M1a`ft r., h O � • a I � v .. A s a 0 i 4 t , tt w a Nc M � � w a AOU W zF U w W c a W ° .. r� a a CG a R o OA d z y w moo ° h o ;cue ° cc Va W W a a' u H � R 61 cl �1 d r u R7 \4 U w w �Dw k w '°'d O Az c h x oaf R _ z �w w eq G Fd b U c a > aE� w ° _ U _ Eo rl v1 a R � � vi Z Q 9 O w c x m co B R A w U o � v a�a8 Sgie E 3SE X��E!=i 2� dg523§:e3 gg2 Ydu n=;ad3� R nagt& x y, e§aaLi W uD.r ° i tlE•s5 &au 21H. 6�'�y'gS e�S"EgES E°cT V 0 hn¢ SS td`@ g5r 5 E3 �oY�gB°."-g 3,y VEVa2 ge�`3=ae= E alESE g5 „.._E:.EemF�33❑ �JTfS� • ..-�`- J 6 e p p % % x % X x x x % k k k 1t 15 d] k % x X % f y � % X k E O o R a � � � s M E $ 3 se s 8 Fw d o 'a i s b � X383 m ' t I r. � AX All� Y 1 d > > I1-j n r �i tm Nel FIC RM �• �.1� m iiiarltu 'tea n | § ■ | P § ` ƒ z�/ - \ M I § ( / 6 41 § } \ ) � § ! \ - � ; \ / f T � « ! ) ! i \2 a j ::;3!F!i 27 Pw I; 25 a � • J� 4 Qj' T 4 8 r 8v� ,a tY(, 222gg bfi � �6 � 3 c° ` C � o du8y�p3,a�� 6 yb ey �6E 8 _ C m a E O• ~ s 8^O��j 1 pC y S < U Sc Y$ 1 C..yyi 2 V r y ED Li 8 tc g n E y a S u S E c i i 5 cv a E p� gU E` .� a. 1Y U Z d o E � e a S S o oR 3 � i.< • f � <� � c3 � 9E °c� 0 �� EO $. m a ep 1. 0 � 3�� ::t y 8 9 D r9n `o }}E F=o a8 cp(g =g ''en.n4 ` o. ivi < w vai a PK C. N o , aN Yj • - ^�d�,yJt• k�" �' {° a,� try.i �' - - r _ - kk d'beI 1h 3 — �' a7 $t3 ar. E� s a t h[r.�r �N+�rv�l..�s• �"Gyy 33 t i a� a uGsPl E ppI u C C � , / a • y V • 6 � •� Ia iu- 2z �J � € \ � b �l | � \ i � . / , $ | , / h jTr | r � z§ / | \ !w( � I- / ■ � | �k = � R /\\ \ _ )0}\/ o-s: \ /)u # / { ' 91 }\ \ � ! . ] ) / � || § | ƒt I ;O�� �� SAM as <oaj ,o� 'C mNYMW m 8d 7E O p Y Y P W xOOLY �YCN N.mj yqY SyAge PU CM ,VO N R V P.0 q .w �,•0, > pY C •°y CNyOp ; Pm „C TY Si W m N W G A p V O p6 d u m F w ✓.0 V'4 0 S A^ Y woo m ob y om4Tvg` t CYV UM ipCy YJ + y Z � 09MGY ey YPP C w � Q •E� O+i Y •�U G Y E ., U 'YU 6q X, dNVYO Mq! x p S M Y O N NC gRLLS LEpAYO YY,mr Y Ww z Y M 0 N > YY q mm Y<N_10 NN WL� ML n' Y LU >iGy j• dV d N V OV N m A Jn Y M w 0 P U p,y y Y y tl 0 Q O Y 6 MrL9 CLPC �. 0 4 VY y M xT Mg pq_1 OOYAY t Y 3 V Mw N S M A = Y f•'•r > M W A Y 4 r'Y CR V CgA SpdM• A ww , Yo '' p .R1'•Ur 'n 0 �1 O r-i hq Y ry N VxOiN� A M�m C P P0„Ly,I f,O >-I dw m 0 P0 YPO sLa CeC >- au 00 1 0 N W U A' M E (KO4�3m W 1 m V•N C' L«'JG 3•Pi 0 G x O i O i NKq �Amry,q W A N O Sw mN U] F S YO C C LP A s8_ mNN 1� >rV IA PC dU 00 A N.1 [[, O �an - M V � S hNV A• 'JM � YM Y„ Y M M RS O it n V Y x yq � C O<r Y M N m x U J yq.0, ` dl _Y, CNO q M qV A Y CNO-IWA NNYNN Vqq N OM Y U F yii8 S W Sx«N N o Omrw T0+1 R•YSUM SLd ao IN u Ij U 2Y m I 4 r r r � , I r , , r WW C s� r W qF I y �` �mlm/ Y/� I • � w Ouu a O4o PU Y.✓i fa iC o ti 9 yj q•PiM 4' 4 > U4P •� O de✓ p o SYtt[ �[wyy. � d40iM8ti 4p9m 90000 Y CJ l�f L dLNOP NCNyq gQGt~ C fg 66 d O C:1J = Ca 5 CTCG09 N 9C✓.y TA U pi tiA O p d9� 0Y .Teti A.grA H � O .Pi N ?� C m V U•C C U O✓ 6 N Y H U 0 aw O >L M 0 x H m 0 y 0 y 0 ✓G d V O G q %9'q .0� U G V ✓ 4 q .Xj Y n 4 Lg U N N q O F F F� v x a:+uo % NpmG ° omgo � >= N ZqO NV . V�•di . ON4 C q �LN✓ O •AP p� C Uti W Z 0.A� d✓ PmY % N✓hgYgX tiN O L N p ti O' .l N 9 ✓ O n Ay F G 9 A "I..%1 C % O A N Y 9 WL 00 A mA mq HSy O 0v 0,0 . W ✓ M n M9 U'�Y imi % pm ✓b W TJ N H N P WCN� dAOpU Ny {Yj LY Op mG L P i m H tl POVydUN M qL •�Y firl .M OOI T ✓ UtmP� OM 00 U M " Nyti . Hd 'lX .,0jCd3dY me p N P A p q > A w 4W 41 H S GA.O.IOGNY9✓ 00 0 G9 N % '�.'Oi'� N9L Y p ✓ q 1✓� A pqd ttYG N U u.H,IT0.A.0i0 tlG•tll d P.d CU bi Cu m A q•y N m •ri U M 7 M Y ✓ m y K w5iNHcPOH+� .y9Y > ✓ p H OI gmCN•JL pm tY rlG6mM 4 •J WC b O HWOM 9mbUML d> FY SS✓�9 WN a � aV app Fa o W N9 ✓'m✓ 0 mYm •N G N•+ Mm C CLO N G mLMpg9 ymy8 Yw W H ✓ C u 4✓CN✓CmL4 ✓m [ o mY rbT .Uq 009dY0 6V �i u N 0 Hn •� 9mw L 0 q o n. A ry T4 .GO0 0 Mw �• q✓ o q 4 Y Oy> ✓ 9CA pO CUCY U ok C. i✓. fl W O yAy ty �FO we 0G GqU R 1 I mO� NYA MOUq qm qCq✓ OSO 4O .�H Oy ✓ q p6 Nqw LB gF0t G0,. q.OgULq OQC ✓ 9 E5 >� •mm�.i YO ✓ UHCY M A ry CC M� bogoG•a O.I✓~LOm Z VV � q 4 O 'S M Oti U M? UJ V rv� � " 9m 4tiH•H✓OA C X6Y k0 Y ry Z 'o ON cool 524.'✓0p.M'y%ai�✓O•oCp•l.G 0 r1 2�U✓j0U`oa N UI . 9 0 " .6 > » No q . a✓' 'N I u pMp Oq _ V Y000✓ UNq F O4SOA ".IM9U0. G~ •.�N H G 9 H ANC q A y Y % O FQ•• O Q a W H H H SVN�NOO+mMA O yZ�l 4 q�• S N ~Om.✓P OI.A� ~q 4 M9gC{N1H O Jytll O MC.OU I�0 Y�gp U y pYOH•(�S1 OM.my O>. � ,pM 1]•'C U M G 00 y6tl 0 X U u V y tl Z .i uq '040 "�•'Iti q ✓ . OOm 4 C K RI M % O0. y✓.�9 Oq✓ > YO .y✓ Qmry Y .0 OKL f � q 0.H C� o p O U Y O� Y y A 1 U Q 5 N p�N✓O �• q ., O OqA O tiA Oh C •• 0. O NOq ry y yYN ✓9YdO Ao E NHm (Z.� yq• U dQ v S KOUnb K O FN6 HpM 6r1 FMdEMS'. Hqn b KW K U Q nm q^ M t N O ` a m ,O C C N 0 nm C•EO Oi u O J D —dn bq r6y °.cma m $ ym 79 0 M m _ m 00] j mm$ S` c�mU nr � v m m 1 vi Z; n O dU7 N •V `o m.anc c u E mwm am c • vo m o to ££g u2S w m oUv � ° m a Ery ny cSm Ea �" m m m y m m m S o vc m n m E H OW N Qm O Q ET�CJmC 9 �L` WO' T A q V L Om C g C O W pp EE O a = p MM m o � 3°£ m m O o5Q ° ° m�� mUtz " = gm"3m �v m c o yl3 cE At« `m K sJimg mm ° € d °rn- gw CL m c 'a mgmp ° m_ m � m 91 AE = ° E N O d � °JL 6m A cc R YE6g' g II -> y y o'• ¢zE Uw O' E E$�n E g Eg—°c � a �tt c.61 °m 3.{Gamros $ amm $ Mm.0 'me '� g g s- E9a a s gL$o ° �p °s sg � m �v 8 am 6� S ° q m • °m���2222 �9 5m g'>yY° mcE �i ES m_ -6 �mmg g 9 m m m mw 5 6 2� ° yZ � e yEm9 3ESi Q Zc�y 9 p¢�°q1}q2g, n E �n•g�Bn n.4 Yn°m�_m �9 m mo g m m flm n n ng p i 3 E m m z 42 $S ES o06 � m R ° O U Wa � °m LLtt�nk 0 n$ g_a 'gg n H c m m ' > � � FF nm y p g E A o O C 2 h 88 Cm °m�YmE' n���!� n� �� K W 5 0 9 aa v 8 co V one m $8° yyE — EH Ti �zEgnmA -3 =gib Alb`�6 $ ❑ b o 3 ig0�c_ d i0 0mc 9c� A � oc�m E WLSS En pyCyC wLL N �� WO� m)m=ALdT .OE d � 0 d �g� H m $O= %Ni0'nty Er 3stc v �E �� cm & W 16 3 3' m o 8° 0v Et£ix=a� iadc..c°Ev `= � d � °c a a c �nc mm .cd. � $ iO_c9 nv ^'EA A p 8 d.y-y9 W ❑ yy m C_ C ❑� �e 3 ° d � � €a � m �E a „ = Emm LL nom Bi ° Ar6 c'h d£ nm�� q c2 N A O N W d £R ° g nq 6 m m C y m w3. gqy�C LiJ Sam m O Z �L U:; OS U E Wa 3 m S] d ° n J "m° r c E m c o m 2 Q y A d d W ~ d n y n N n oiL� Ev E m d a W~ m O m $ n vW m o U L z°_ m 2 C\ t N 00,S0023:2 C N � ce ; WaEa&r, •N 3° m n; c m a E� .2 3 a 3 L m o c 'mP Na .. °im8ic A m W ° rE -o " Q n m m m d d m t E » E n E $ m � W Wa« mci �. =N O OfY n"'9Nm U � E g O'S �d.2 a m a =°• E 1° ffi > $y A o m n m v v �❑ LW ' any AL ° s K W IV 8 N O YL CC 0.Y9 Pm C Y LWL p ,t8 Y e 9 i t. •e°T q �n ��.• b u w �°a �oa i' V ,,,���yyy ° V V �f � �2 •°w� • pObp Y� V SNV �N •O G �.I • 8 U \ qYp CO fY O x H C U Y V O a T Y Y >•n T 9 V py.w uY � p y O xCti Y.�11�::I li ��..:.. . • Oe Y�mm 6P = V ; :� > Y Y by K % RU° AHU V F¢ •:y�1 ypy lof u.ap£V U Ytt CEO M y Oa CUU�N N{ u�w d N 2v, pooOAH HYG U T ZMUAUZ� 4, 00 0 _ u N U Y o C R O ,£ y A 9 Y Yw b Y A mQ p N N Uuu°RN ° YON . A Z o 2-,,o > > M u'0 Q p j U m u o E u .. 0 0 C °HK N C< EeY >uO wE C Y a b UuroO �aCp° uAOT A w wy NAUN CqR AUU C+ jMSOyu8 Z . AY U'.Y. A y £^y Op NBC ua 'a p eV'w , F o L v 1 U P ZN•° O yT Y > >� O YN+°IM x0 w VGONI H L 2 yN ERU A UHL C1^ � OC :,;Am mH.= NOmup Au rTi e'J{ UU H N G A 0 L M ti O U u to N °SM FWN6 U HJ NU C u 00, i V . IbV S m £ y N 3I N A A U .'U u n U (�� A H A uAAUAOy MO \ �` A U U O • £ £dU) O R£ Ym 3W£ V N Ku V: C V we • N Jt L 10 ALU nf. Sew -�--: /.� W/U& IA irk •ff f � '�,'`;•%!ice ii � ' �, � e „S.• Asa •� ' b / o!� it � i'ri� �«'"��+1, :�4;• • ,, • < , r, I sEcnoNcnoN Ols - CIE 4WIEQ4V9WR7V Q4 CaWOP9QWtl IERNWSY IF®W �41EWO.OR7® RY®W449 -•.u• J a c ..onw.rant i- un unoa.nre, 'iruv' ex SSECnON- Q°StEp1UD@ ILQAR7D�6,°QI�fE �WWOD®W " SFCTON-9G• EAMDIRM ¢°aQLY1 ONW®QD LAN=QWIE TRE&TmEwy BECTON-•CC f/u ' p ECONJMC DEYF1OpYEHIAGENCY •O•J'•"•`•w" . mar .,°�',`.`''•"'^'�, '^"ww �' STERLING AVENUE AREA PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ACCESS IMPROVEMENT S MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ♦f♦PODf Y t t T SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE/MITIGATION PLAN trKrsGrRrrN I4d tt • A �, i 3•.,t� lam!' f�' •�'• IMF\. ■ t IF Rvi F��i ��ae eye I+R`I�• r ,. . aaNr f , II | I / ) C � ��&m ©` • • ,/�/( 4 ■ | | 4&x12» - & 3 : .�� \" § \ ,= r — � e ,o ® 2 4, - M 2 = <'zoom' .. ! o = <#DZW< ° § V) 2j�W,k� i I I ( | ( 8 �-@2-! ! |, ` r _ $ ! ± 2 LUE`E®§ ® © -,O� 0 § z <=Be&` , /! ) ) V ,Z>OE - y e \ ;o; , � 8 2 04 -- 2 - - . L x ƒ ! «)/y _ §2§§§ ))§ \ - 4.Rw ■ a , Ra | _ §� ` | | l!�, |���!l,,;,[ ! . |!! }( • - sir i .1�� t _ )•% `a _ r _'J•! "� .A. ` : � � •I `.t� y S �,`off � / �� ,� is /�� � • B F?;_ � ' 9 s_. I � �� � •i"a Sad v'd �-� 1 / BCAB B• 8 t� ; e6s4� IN \ � I � • ® fiWfl5i3 WARNER W. HODGDON IIILJII^JIL IIII HEART BAR RANCH.ARROWHEAD SPR NGS t0$T SAN BOX BERNAR DR0,CARMA 92M 111)221-I547 (714)886.9942 April 29, 1994 Mr. Roger Hardgrave Director of Public Works and City Engineer City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418-0001 RE: Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) May 2, 1994 Council Planning Agenda Item 27 Stubblefield un-permitted Massive Grading/Bulldozing, and caused Downstream Hazards by June 1992 Dear Mr. Hardgrave: S Thank you for briefly speaking with me by phone on Friday, April 29, 1994. It is my understanding that the Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property Variance and 25-99 year (124) year Development Agreement regarding City Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary is on the May 2, 1994 Planning Agenda. This mater was unanimously continued by the Council on April 4, 1994 to May 2, 1994. • I subsequently met with you relative to same on Monday, April 11, 1994. At that time you had informally met with Mr. Al Boughey, Director of Planning. Building Services and Code Enforcement regarding the Stubblefield matter as documented and presented to the Council on April 4, 1994. Following our April 11, 1994 meeting you were going to again communicate further with Mr. Boughey as to his intent to set a time to have all related persons meet for common purpose to discuss east/west Rt. 330 Two Different feasible City Full-Standard Access Routes(s) and Code Enforcement of Stubblefield caused Downstream Hazards, etc. Accordingly, I wrote you my April 21, 1994 letter regarding our April 11, 1994 meeting. (For Reference: See April 21, 1994 Warner Hodgdon letter to Roger Hudgrave, City Engineer RE: Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Planning Applicadon(s)) You were later requested to meet with City Administrator, Shauna Clark and Mr. Boughey regarding the April 4, 1994 Stubblefield Application(s) for east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property, and the City Council unanimous continuance thereof to May 2, 1994. Mr. Boughey's determination was not to meet with the related parties as the Council had given no specific direction for him to do anything over the period of their unanimous 28 day of their unanimous 28 day continuance�riod from Apri14, 1994 to May 2. 1994from April 4. 1994 to May 2. 1994. The Council gave Mr. Boughey specific Directives as to Stubblefield on July 15, 1991 and March 22, 1993, and he chose to stonewall them and not respond on these also. HERBAGE OF THE MOUNTAWS AND VA Y BEGAN W 1910 {� OHEADQUARTERS.POST OMCE BOX 21K.ARROWHEAD SPRD .SAN BERNARDWO,CAIhORNIA 92b W RESIDENCE MAn2NG:329S BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDNO,CALIFORNIA 92A09,o14)993L113 WW A VARNER V.NOOL MARRY GROIR AiF _ Page 2 The April 4, 1994 Stubblefield Special Development Code Amendment Planning Staff Report prepared for Director Al Boughey states: "This Amendment proposes a set of criteria that could be used by the City to consider the approval of subdivisions which cannot feasibly provide two standard access Key Points: "A tentative map may be exempted from providing two standard means of access, 1930200(6), if the Fire Chief,Planning Director and City Engineer find that:" There is no husible fusible alternative to providing two standard access route(,) "If a tentative map is located within a Foothill Fire Zone, and the above in2(s) can be made, the map must still provide nonstandard secondary access to accommodate emerged vehicle(s)in accordance with the minimum width and local requirements of article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code(20 feet). A non standard access route is an access road that does not meet one or both of the criteria stated at the beginning Qf this section. Clearly the Special Development Code Amendment, the April 4, 1994 Planning Staff Report, the Department of Public Works/City Engineer February 2, 1994 Memorandum and the Fire Chiefs February 1, 1994, Inter-Office Memorandum addresses the PHYSICAL FEASIBILITY of two City Full-Standard access Route(s) for Public Health and Safety. The Code Amendment clearly does not provide for exempting Public Health and Safetv two Different Feasible City Full Standard Access ROU[e(SI under the hidden gorse of FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY. • The City Administration, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement, the Fire Chief and the Department of Public Works voiced no consideration of concern as to FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY for City Full-Standard to Rancho San Andreas (Hodgdon son's) Sterling Avenue Area property through December 19, 1991-July 3, 1993. Never-the-less Rancho San Andreas Company volunteered two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Development Code Public Health and Safety access routes) at a proportionate cost of $700± thousand. The Sterling Avenue Primary dedicated access was a 60 feet R/W 40 foot curb to curb paying, sidewalk. streetlights, trails) landscape trees irrigation and internal 24 foot curb to curb paved Secondary Access and Primary Access with 28 foot 16 foot high Multi Plate Underpass. I realize that you knew nothing prior to April 4, 1994 of the Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property un-permitted Massive Grading/Bulldozing of debris, thousands of boulders, tons of material, removal of large trees and stumps all dumped over the cliffs into the City Creek Streamed by June 1992. This was documented by On-The-Scene and In-The-Act Stubblefield D-9 Dozer and Heavy Loader photolog(s) submitted to the Council and Deputy City Attorney Henry Empefio, on March 22, 1993. The Council on March 22, 1993 directed the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement to investigate and process the environmental review of related Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 MMFAGE OF l MOUNFAB95 AND VALLEY BEGAN W ISSO ONEADQUMnM;9 OFFICE W%11".MBOWHE.AD QBDiGS,SAN BEBNAM)p10,CAI1FOIlN1A 91M6 RESIDENCE MArtJNG:5195 BROMMOOB WULLVARD,SAN BEMW MO,CAS➢O 92A .M4)ISMIS5 WW A.AR R t.HOOC.00H FA MY LR"AR n Page 3 acre property, sub-standard to Full-Standard access roads including cost thereof, 50 year Development Agreement and the un-permitted actions of Massive Grading, Bulldozing, removal of large trees and stumps. Accordingly, this Council actions forced Stubblefield to then have to properly submit three days later, their applicable March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s). We have not heard from the City Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement as to the April 4, 1994 unanimous Council vote to continue the Stubblefield matter until May 2, 1994. Certainly the Council did not intend Mr. Boughey to continue non-communication with the related parties, including the Hiehland Hills Homeowners Association. Never-the-less the City Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement is responsible for the proper handling of the Stubblefield March 26, 1993 Application(s), but not limited to, their un- permitted Development Code Violation activity(s). Please feel free for yourself, the City Administrator and the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement to call or meet with us at any time. Aaron and I have worked hard and will not bend for City Sub-Standard(s) Public/Health and Safety. Respectfully, ` n Warner W. Hodg dgdon CC: Mayor and Common Council Shauna Clark,City Administrator At Boughey,Director of Planning,Building Services and Code Enforcement Henry Empeflo,Deputy City Attorney HERBAGE OF TFIE MOU?rF Q AND VALLEY REGAN W 1150 (� OHEADQUARTERS:9O5T OFF[ E BOX 1 116,ARROWMAD SMV4M.SAN IFANARDWO,ULINR 92106 (�7 RENDENCE MM G:3295 RROADMOOR SOUS MD,SAN RERNARDWO,CAI6O 921D1,(111)353 4153 A WAMER V.NOOLOON iA601.Y M"ANI1 n WARNER W. HODGDON HEART BAR RANGH,ARROWHEADSNG6 POST OFHCT:BOX 3146 SAN BERNARDWO.GALffOR 92906 (719)881-150 TF3fLhPY: (TIQ9E6-9963 May 1, 1994 Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino Mr. Al Boughey, Director Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 RE: Stubblefield Public Hearing May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. March 26, 1993 Planning Application(s) West/East Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property (1) Stubblefield Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment (2) Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access Variance (3) Stubblefield Sub-Standard 25-99(124)year Development Agreement (4) Initial Environmental Study and Negative Declaration(IES-ND) Council/Planning Agenda Item 27 Dear Mayor, Common Council and Mr. Boughey: The following is submitted for the Public record regarding the above, but not limited to, related issues: 1. The City and Superior Court approved the May 16, 1989 City/Highland Hills Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement and effective concurrently with the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR. The Homeowners January 14, 1988 Legal Action(s) against the Mayor, Common Council, City Development and Environmental Review Committee (DERC) were Dismissed as part of the Settlement Agreement. The City of Highland had appeared with the Highland Hills Homeowners Association as Amicus Curaie. Other parties to the Settlement Agreement were William E. Leonard, President, San Gorgonio Development Company; William G. Smith (deceased); Rancho San Andreas Company (RSA); Warner Hodgdon and Highland Hills Properties,a Limited Partnership seller by William E. Leonard,General Partner. William a arg.a is r 'll Ud. Partners Gencwl Partner. William Smith(deceased)was a General Partner. Limited partners are:Jeff y and Marvin Reimer. (Former Sun Publisher). Glen L. Davis.D.D.S.. Carl Hendricks,MD.,Dr. Wilbur and Henrietta Eich. C L and Leona Banesund.Martin and Margaret Match Dr. Philip and Janet&12e.and Dr.Elmer Hansen 2, The Highland Hills Homeowners Association, President, Mr. James Nunn, Captain S.B. County Sheriffs Department, appeared before the Mayor and Common Council at the applicable April 4, 1994 Public Hearing and voiced concerns for the Public Record as to the HERITAGE OF THE MOUNFANS AND VAUPV BEGAN N 1850 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 21M.ARROWHEAD SBRNGS,SAN BER2rARDN0.CAIIfORN1A 92406 RESIDENCE MA%WG:5295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERHARDNO,GAEDVRNIA 92M4,M4)9830151 WWW A V..B m.H ... ---GROUP-ATE Page 2 City/Homeowners Association Settlement Agreement under the July 3, 1989 City updated General Plan/Development Code. Mr. Nunn conveyed that the City was now going back on that Agreement. Accordingly, Mr. Nunn informed the City of Highland, Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino of the, (1) Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Scenic Highway Sub-Standard Primary/Secondary Access, (2) Special Code Amendment (3) Variance, and (4) 124 year Development Agreement, June 1992 caused City Creek Downstream Hazards, etc. This matter was discussed on the City of Highland Agenda at the meeting of Tuesday, April 26, 1994. The Highland City Manager requested all related documents from the City of San Bernardino Planning Department. 3. Warner Hodgdon appeared before the Mayor and Common Council at the April 4, 1994 Public Hearing, voiced concerns with solution(s) and submitted various Documentation, City Certified Minutes of July 15, 1991 and March 22, 1993 Council Directives and Photologs, etc. for the record The City Clerk's Office April 11, 1994 letter ratifies that which was submitted for the Record by Mr. Hodgdon. (See attached April 11, 1994 City Clerk's Office letter RE:Warner Hodgdm submitted documentation) 4. W.J. McKeever Engineering is both engineers for the contiguous Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 "Mountain Shadows' and Rancho San Andreas Company Highland Hills (Forest Creek Country Club and Resort). The W.J. McKeever April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) submitted to the City document the east/west Rt. 330 existing Sub-Standard to City Full- Standard Costs, and that Two Different City Full-Standard Access Route(s) are Physically and Economically Feasible. (For Reference: See April 4, 1994 City Creek Scenic Drive Enviroscape and Improvements Report, Schematic Engineers Plan(s),Cost Estimates)and Illustrative Cost Map) 5. On April 4, 1994 the Mayor and Common Council unanimously continued the applicable Stubblefield Agenda Item 36 and Public Hearing for the intent of further City Planning Staff review with the related party(s), i.e.: Stubblefield, RSA, Highland Homeowners Association, City of Highland, etc. Ample time was allowed for this City purpose by the continuance from April 4, 1994 to the Mayor and Common Council meeting of May 2, 1994, 2 P.M. 6. On April 4, 1994 the Mayor and Common Council approved Agenda Item 35, Special Sub-Standard Access Development Code Amendment and IES-ND. The Mayor and Common Council then approved the required Second Reading at their meeting of April 18, 1994. The effective date is 30 days from City Planning properly filing the Notice of Determination with S.B. County and the State Office of Planning and Research. 7. The April 4, 1994 Stubblefield Special Development Code Amendment Planing Staff Report prepared for Al Boughey, Director of Planning Building Services and Code Enforcement states: "This Amendment proposes a set of criteria that could be used by the City to consider the approval of subdivisions which ca Not feasibly provide two standard access routels). Key Points: HERBAGE OF 731E MOUNTAINS AND VAUEY BEGAN IN 1830 OH,DQUARnas:W OFHCE WX 2116.ARROWHP 1D SIRN S.SMt BERNARDINO,CA[trORNIA 92W RESn)ENCE MAKING:3295 BROADMOOR BOUISVARD,SAN BE1tNA W%CAILORNIA 92/ .(714)8834153 A VAANER P.HODGDON FAMLLY GROVF AFFaIAiE Page 3 "A tentative map may be exempted from providing two standard means of access, 79.30.200(6), if the Fire Chief, Planning Director and City Engineer find that:" _here is no feasible alternative to amvidine two standard asses rowe(s) "If a tentative map is located within a Foothill Fire Zone,and the above ine(s) can be made, the map must still provide nonstandard secondary access to accommodate e�H<rgencv vehicle/cl in accordance with the minimum width and local requirements of article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code(20 feet). rot_te i an access road that nec t meet one nr both of the criteria rated ai the beginning of this. Clearly the Special Development Code Amendment, the April 4, 1994 Planning Staff Report, the Department of Public Works/City Engineer February 2, 1994 Interoffice Memorandum and the Fire Chiefs February 1, 1994, Inter-Office Memorandum addresses the PHYSICAL FEASIBILITY of two City Full-Standard access Route(s) for Public Health and Safety. The Special Development Code Amendment clearly DOES NOT provide for exempting Public Health and Safety two Different Feasible City Full Standard Access Route(s) under the hidden guise of FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY. 8. The City Administration, Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement, the Fire Chief and the Department of Public Works voiced no consideration of concern as to FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY for City Full-Standards to Rancho San Andreas (Hodgdon son's) Sterling Avenue Area property through December 19, 1991 to July 3, 1993. Never-the-less Rancho San Andreas Company volunteered two Different Feasible City Full- Standard Development Code Public Health and Safety access route(s) at a proportionate cost of$700—+ thousand The Sterling Avenue Pnmary dedicated access is a 60 feet RIW 40 foot curb to curb paving sidewalk streetlights. trail(s). landscape_ trees. irrigation and internal 24 foot curb to curb paved Secondary Access and Primary Access with 28 foot-16 foot high Multi-Plate Underpass. 9. Per the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommendations, the April 4, 1994 adopted Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code is applicable only for City consideration of Subdivisions which cannot feasibly provide two Full-Standard Access Route(s). May 2, 1994 Stubblefield Sub-Standard Access roads Variance and 124 year Development Agreement 10. Per the April 4, 1994 Planning Staff Report, the February 1, 1994 Fire Chiefs and February 2, 1994 City Engineers FINDINGS by Inter-Office Memorandum(s), the Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommended the Stubblefield Sub- Standard Access Route(s) Variance and 124 year Stubblefield Development Agreement covering the east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property. A. Fire Chiefs February 1, 1994 FINDINGS and partial Quote: "Based on the information available, there does not Seen to be a feasible way W provide a standard secondary access." B. City Engineer's February 2, 1994 FINDINGS and partial Quote: HERBAGE OF iliE MOUMAWS AND VALIJ:Y BEGAN IN 1858 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFHCE BOX 21".ARROWHEAD SMWOS,SAN BERNARDINO.CAIIFORNU 92406 IT RESIDENCE MAKING:5295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNA WO,CAOFOR 93404,(714)9634153 WWW A VAKNk V,HODGDON QD FAM4Y GRON AfiM1IAiE Page 4 "The Stubblefield's purpose to use the east Frontage Road is for their primary access. There is no feasible way to provide a standard secondary access to the site." C. The Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement has not provided his written FINDINGS along with that of the Fire Chief and City Engineer that there is no feasible way to provide a standard, secondary access to the site. This is as required under the newly adopted Special City Sub-Standard Access Development Code. 11. The Stubblefields "Mountain Shadows"/Rancho San Andreas Highland Hills mutual Engineer, W.J. McKeever s April 4, 1994 Schematic Engineering Plan(s) and Cost Estimate(s) submitted to the City documents the east/west Rt. 330 existing Sub-Standard Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standard Liability Cost, and that Two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Route(s) for Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property are physically and economically Feasible. Variance and Development Agreement "Moot": Therefore the Stubblefield east Rt 330/City Creek Canyon Sub-Standard Access Variance No. 93-07 and the 124 Year Development Agreement No 93-01 are Moot and not needed as handled and recommended by the Director of Planning. Building Services and Code Enforcement. 12. At the April 4, 1994 Mayor and City Council Public Hearing the Deputy City Attorney, Henry Empeno stated the City Attorney's Office position. Accordingly, the City Attorney's office does not approve the Resolution(s) for the Stubblefield Variance and Development Agreement due to: (1) the 124 year term under page 4 and paragraph 5 is uncontionable, and more important, (2) the Development Agreement is not in compliance with the City Code Ordinance(s) or State Law. The Development Agreement must set forth the Land Use and Plan. 124 year City/Stubblefield Development Agreement IFS-ND: The Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement recommended that the Mayor and Common Council approve the Stubblefield east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property 124 year Development Agreement IE -ND. The Initial Environmental Study-Negative Declaration (IES-ND) and Variance is INADEQUATE and the City Consultant/Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement did not address the following future Accumulative Impacts including, but not limited to: 1. The April 15, 1991 Mayor and Common Council Directive to the Department of Planning to process the City Initiated Amendment to the July 3, 1989 Updated City General Plan/FEIR RE: Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 766% Density Increase, including 480 High Density Apartments (24 DU's per acre) east Rt. 330/City Creek Canyon 20 acre property). The purpose was for the Proposed Settlement Agreement regarding the Stubblefield $11.5 Million. WWAGE OF THE MOUNTA AND VA 1 y BEGAN W 1850 Jm{{�$�1}} OHEADQUARTERS:POST OMN BOX 2W,ARROWHEAD SeRWGS,SAN BERNA WO.OM21DR 92W Y RESIDENCE WMWG:3295 BROADMOOR WMVARD.SAN BERNA WO,CAl2FOR 92� ,(714)883-0153 W A vAR RV.NOIX:DON FW.0 O0 A"RI Page 5 2. Caltrans/Federal Highway Administration constructed a 178 foot protection/retaining wall along east Rt. 330 to preserve the Historic 1884 City Creek Canal east of the old City Creek road. The Environmental re-evaluation was under the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Final Section 4(f) evaluation (Historic Properties eligible for inclusion to the National Register of Historic Places), National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC 470F) and California State Historic Preservation 36 CFR Part 800, National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). The measures to minimize harm to the Historic City Creek Canal (City of San Bernardino) were discussed with the Highland/East Highlands Historical Society, the Executive Director of Cultural and International Affairs for the City of San Bernardino, Historic Preservation Task Force, the City of San Bernardino Historic Society and the San Bernardino County Historian. This was in compliance with 36 CFR 800.1 (c) (2), public participation in the Section 10b review process. By June 1992 Stubblefield had bulldozed out the Caltrans/FHWA preserved Historic 1884 City Creek canal east of Rt. 330 and the old City Creek Road, the City Full-Standards) width (Minimum 24 feet or more) of the east Rt. 330 Frontage secondary emergency road extension can now be widened under the Caltrans/City MOU to the 124 year City/Stubblefield Development Agreement. This access width then also allows the construction of the north east/west Rt. 330 two Different Feasible City Full-Standard Access Road(s) Multi-Plate underpass (Minimum 24 feet or more). FHWA July 1990 Final Section 4(F) Evaluation: Historic 1884 City Creek Canal Measures and Minimize Harm: Page 6, Para(s),Quote: "As discussed above, there are no feasible and prudent alternatives which avoid the use of Section 4(/) land. The preferred alternative is a feasible and prudent alternative,which,after consideration of mitigation, will result in minimal harm to the City Creek Ditch. The following design measures were developed to minimize the harm to the City Creek Ditch." A 178 foot long retaining wall would be constructed at the base of the embankment where the East Frontage Road crosses the City Creek Ditch (see Maps C and D). In so doing, the proposed frontage road would use an existing crossing of the canal. This measure would avoid using any part of the canal east of existing City Creek Road. It is the parts of the canal east of City Creek Road and west of existing SR-330 that retain the highest degree of nt r " (For Reference: See July 1990 FHWA Evaluation Exhibit Topo Map B and Topo Map C of the Historic 1884 City Creek Canal,Eucalyptus Grove large trees) (For Reference: See attached July 1990 FHWA Final Section 4(F)Evaluation for: Rte. 30/330 Freeway Re: 1884 Historic City Creek Ditch) 3. The July 17, 1992 Director of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement Interoffice Memorandum recommended processing the Stubblefield 44 acre west Rt. 330 Borrow Site,Fill Material Sale to Rt. 330 Caltrans/Contractor, underlying 80 Mobil Homes lots, Primary Access and Draft September 11, 1992 City Consultant IES-ND. The July 17, 1992 Interoffice Memorandum includes, as attached thereto, the July 14, 1992 Planning Department letter to Stubblefield, i.e.: east/west Rt. 330 Frontage Road(s) Connector Underpass built by s HERITAGE OF r MOUNrA AND VA Y BEGAN W 1150 O ._..DQUA nM 9 01A BOX 21".ARROmLR'.AD 6PRDiGS,SAN BERNAllDINO,CAIhORN1A 92b RESIDENCE MARHIG:3293 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,3AN BERNARDD.O.CAI3FORNIA BUM.()1/)883 4133 WW A WARNER W.HOOGOON FAM6T G0.0UI.1FiWATE Page 6 Caltrans to City Fire Department Health and Safety Width Specification(s) (Minimum 10 foot wide unpaved Equestrian Trail(s) tunnel). By October 23, 1990 Stubblefield Sworn Declarations, under Penalty of Perjury for the Trial, they represented Agreements to sell Rt. 330 Fill Material from the Mountain Shadows 492 low income Apartment Site and west Rt. 330 Borrow Site to Caltrans Contractor. In April 1989 RSA-Highladn Hills committed to Caltrans/Contractor to provide the Rt. 330 Fill Material at no cost. 4. The March 22, 1993 Mayor and Council Directive to the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement was to process the related Environmental Review of the Stubblefield east/west Rt. 330 City Creek Canyon 20 acre property April 15, 1991 Density Increase, City/Caltrans/Stubblefield three party 50 year Development Agreement, investigate the existing east/west Rt. 330 Frontage Road(s) Sub-Standard to City Full- Standard City liability cost of improvements/maintenance and un-permitted violations of Code Enforcement per Warner Hodgdon March 22, 1993 letter, documentation and photolog(s). 5. The Stubblefield un-permiteed City Development Code Violations and Downstream Hazards caused by June 1992 from Massive Grading/Bulldozing of thousands of boulders, debris, tons of foreign material, removal of complete Eucalyptus Grove large trees and stumps, etc. by dumping over the cliffs into the City Creek streambed. Downstream Hazards,but not limited to, impact the SBCT&FCG,EV WD,Caltrans,RSA and existing Homes east of the City Creek Levy in the City of Highland. 6. Caltrans designed the Rt. 330 Freeway to accommodate the City Improvement of the east/west Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standards Primary Access width, i.e.: 40 foot curb to curb paved section. This is the width Re-evaluated, Re-confirmed, established and approved by Planning, City Fire and City Engineer for the Sterling Avenue Area Primary/Secondary Access effective July 3, 1993. 7. The exposure to the City or Stubblefield for this premeditated sub-standard emergency access procedure liability, i.e.: Stop Rt. 330 Freeway Traffic at a point of high degree curve bank super and 7% grade, cut the Rt. 330 Fence down, pull up the post and then drive emergency vehicles down a 1200 foot 7%t grade unpaved road is not acceptable. And in the back-up alternative, expose the City even more to another premeditated sub-standard emergency access procedure liability of a minimum 10 foot wide unpaved equestrian multi- plate tunnel at the end of the 1300± foot long 32 foot wide east Rt. 330 Road Cul-de-Sac. 8. The City Full-Standard Improvement of the Sub-Standard west Rt. 330 Frontage Road would require the west extension of the existing Equestrian/Emergency access minimum 10 foot wide unpaved tunnel. The extension required by the City Full-Standard street width would cause IMPRACTICAL, if not impossible, emergency vehicle egress and/or ingress. (40 foot curb to curb paved section plus sidewalk, landscape, irrigation, trees, recreation trail(s) and rail(s), streetlights,drainage,etc.). a 9. The improper drainage for the existing west Rt. 330 Frontage Road at the west ingress/egress of the equestrian/emergency Tunnel (Arch Pipe Culvert) has caused the failing of the slope bank(s) and which are sliding into the lower Mobil Home(s). The 3/4 to 1 Cut Slope Bank(s) to the north are also failing from Springs and Instability. This is impacting the Health and Safety of the above Mobil Homes and the City Development Code allows a HERBAGE OF l MOUNTA AND VAi3EY BEGAN 811850 OHEADQUARTERS:POST OFFICE BOX 2116,ARROwHF.SD SPRPIGS,SAN BERNARDMO.CAiITORNIA 92b RESIDENCE MAN :329S BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNA WO.CAiJFOR 921M,rA1)8834153 9 A9A0. m.NOM FAM6T__ATFlI _ Page 7 maximum 1.5 to 1 Cut Slope Banks only. There is on-going evidence of high potential City Liability. { Adopting Resolution: Authorizing and Directing the Mayor to Execute Stubblefield Development Agreement No. 93-01: With sincere knowledge and experience I strongly recommend that the Mayor and Common Council not approve or execute the Draft Resolution or 124 year Stubblefield '$ Development Agreement as prepared and apparently mis-handled The Draft Resolution is written adverse to the Public Health Safety and Welfare of the Citizenry. but not limited to, and is inconsistent to the facts under Section 3 Recitals Section 4 Negative Declaration, Section 6 Findings Section 8 Notice of Determination and Section 9 Recordation. The 124 year Stubblefield Development Agreement and the Department of Planning, Building Services and Code Enforcement process therefore is unclear as to: (1) City Sub- Standard Access Procedure Liability, (2) the existing east/west Rt. 330 Sub-Standard Frontage Road(s) to City Full-Standards Improvements/Maintenance City Cost Liability and responsibility ($1.5± Million), and (3) the City liability for City blatant non-response to known Stubblefield un-permitted Development Code Violations by June 1992, including Massive Grading/Bulldozing, removal of the 1884 Historic City Creek Canal, removal of complete Eucalyptus Grove large trees and stumps, debris, thousands of boulders and tons of foreign material dumped over the cliffs into the City Creek Streambed causing serious Downstream Hazards to Public/Private Facilities, i.e.: SBCI'&FCG, EVWD, Caltrans, RSA and existing Homes east of the City Creek Levy, in the City of Highland. I reconfirm our April 4, 1994 Public Position and concern for City Full-Standard(s) with no personal motivation as to the Stubblefields. RSA-Highland Hills will participate in the proportionate east Rt. 330 Frontage Road Improvement(s)/Maintenance District(s) cost, including like consideration for Rt. 330 City Creek Scenic Highway Landscape. Thank you for your time and consideration. We believe the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland Deserve City Full-Standard Streets ... Too. Respectfully, Warner W. Hodgdon on CC: Shauna Clark,City Administrator Al Boughey,Director, Planning,Building services and Cade Enforcement Roger Hardgrave,City Engineer Will Wright, Fire Chief WMAGE OF 1HE MOUNFAMS AND VALLEY BEGAN N 1850 OHEADQUARTERS:POST Of lu=(2W,ARROW SPRD 'SAN BERNARDDiO,CALDORNIA 9M86 RESIDENQ MAnSNG:3295 BROADMOOR BOULEVARD,SAN BERNARDDJO,GUSFORNM 9210{,(111)8 8 3-0153 WW A VAR RP.HOOGOJH I--'---AfF TC P�eFttNARM^,o C' S 7` _ - C C I T Y O F Y Z D ED jr, an Bernardino R A C H E L C L A R K C I T Y C L E R K April 11, 1994 Warner W. Hodgdon Heart Bar Ranch, Arrowhead Springs P.O. Box 2146 San Bernardino, CA 92406 Dear Mr. Hodgdon: This is to acknowledge receipt of the documents you submitted during the Mayor and Council meeting held on April 4, 1994 relative to Development Code Amendment No. 93-05, Agenda Item 35, and Development Code Amendment No. 93-01 and Variance No. 93-07 Agenda Item 36 as follows: Letters dated February 18, February 20, and April 4, 1994, directed to Al Boughey, Director of Planning, Building services and Code Enforcement; Letter dated February 8, 1994, directed to Robert Stone, Chairman of the Planning Commission; Letter dated April 4, 1994, directed to the Mayor and Common Council; Report Book, Schematic Engineering Plans and Cost Estimates entitled "City Creek Scenic Highway Enviroscape and Improvements east/West Rte. 330 City Full-Standard Access Roads Police - Fire- Emergency - Recreation Trails" prepared by Aaron Hodgdon and Warner Hodgdon dated April 4, 1994. The Mayor and Common Council voted to continue the matter to May 2, 1994 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North I'D" Street, San Bernardino, California. sincerely, Diane Jones Daputy Oxlty t el erk o x 1 31 9 , S A N B E R NA 11 0 1 N1 . CALIFORNIA 92402 3 0 0 N O R T H 0 S T R E E T 6 A N B E R N A R D I N O PRIDE c AL1FORNIA 924 , 9 - 000 , (909) 394 - 5002 IN PROGRESS (9 0 0 ) 3 8 4 - 6 1 0 2 F A X -(9 0 9 ) 3 8 4 -6 4 6 9 �� v M H � w w e I o M con 09, N z a � z �n ^ d c w U V " W U � VU � � � Q � � x oNO a pU � w w �qq W w v� vi In v, z M I • U w W w � u E El 0 E 0 a MOiLL N S,I5�3l o'J�� NO x II- '2a • h��;s ' J�� ' O a U LITtltlgi oos FI Ga o J� �" �• •� ,. L['� r Q zd� Z o cn W a O 8 Q W¢u p o �Q Eon a3o ■ �� m � Fowa y ,. ` ••• y •. ,., Ln r fA vi on Dz■ ♦i ■ ♦ 8 � � • a Ln .O♦�.• �I $ 1 gz- rr r` y^�tid z � a� � . h� —c,. g z� �\� % � � L� ao C 0.Q a WZ W° W x°x 0 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FINAL SECTION 4 (f) EVALUATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STATE ROUTE 30 FROM ARDEN AVENUE TO FIFTH STREET . AND ROUTE 330 FROM ROUTE 30 TO 0.7 MILE NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE 08-SBd-30-R26.7/R30. 3 08-SBd-330-28.7/30. 3 08201-157901 Prepared by: Department of Transportation - District 8 San Bernardino, California JULY 1990 m a CL it w 4 co cc . ti t 6 O -- o -•r._.F.�:i_�;�"cif? ��;i�; � 5 o d -- M ♦ y �Olnv O Y om O m� Z Vo=� u�u�� ZEN :•O � J ' (.0 Lo H SDNIydS OryIH W i �. Z O W O1 �r� ' '•. II O M a O a CD •^ Z M /9 / U30•Y106 M W dy z s AV s Z F' W 0W1 :D Q 4. F W =) IA m U 0 oc� z D `l 0 cr tu D cr o W 0 A „ W V H S H�tlf1HO � ZOOCIZ >• O I . c� nr a a. fJ) O Z Z = z G Ual- Y' � Z g O = W O U' ; AlVd Q I Z C7 F' LL ` U 1�.. a L I LJ = N M O U Cr- —0 O LL C U. {. M La 0 U W LL c ,V. 117 t fD o O o Z Y W � H QQD1— F.W m a nv r ao t� Z CL WSJ e M • W YZ E" NG > o - - s cr �. fD Wop a a Q V Z cc U... 0 W Na --.> w ViHOIOIA c) Z cc Q. W wP 1 Z!� r P .0. O 00 0 � � � � � p 0 C U O �AI P+ m nz � ° � o2in7i � � 3 n7 u � So O P a " NWmN• OD 2 C3 Q Ct W W N �k Z� 'n a ONI WUS y > y N a j }( a 00 { W l $ yl°"'�j F ^V' 3AV s u M w 4 = H 6 0 R R W R t C „but 0 con 0 iE Lc O m y F o00 R ° O V h 0 ° O m m YL- 0 vii • OYM3_ 5 FM..P ll. O)••wI NYfM 1 • 1 1 sky `- •. � c — i s OW 41 PYC�Z co IN � y l('ill .... . ,::�. •�•..;;\\ � � � � .L ♦r � � � '� W� \ � ..: ; � , � •`s R ■`; � .. o.o `--L�r- 177 �, � • j / W , z I l( `/ Il.� !' j�' •�Jr, �a ll - N - �. { - �.._ � ' . � ;•� �,� �--• < � . ^ ^ : did -L :'i.: l• 1'�II�,�,JI! II �I ��\, Y^ � � %'i / •�■¢' ���-� 0] � � C 7 8 A � A v vl.l. '..l 1 _.�:'"•.. � '''`—:' (�s I}.. I��I(11�\f`c�\�v _ , „`. � C g CYO� ° R F o R 1� F ,wu • ��r �^' v .?:� .. �• ``� � v ?• '^ \� ^ y_-/,dam/ vttp�.---T�� � ' u.. � 'p� g• r ' /, _ 1. / /� { ' ,r.•1�y�,1 ���, .$, �' \ 4`1\✓'/� l� �'VC�:� - _mot « L ?-•,,• } ,�",r,.•/ ...:..rte.--_T'-'.'i,. .�_.�-'1 I ,