Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBook 08 01/13/69 - 07/31/69 1028 [ MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1969, AT THE MASONIC TEMPLE, FOURTH AND ARROWHEAD, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, 8:00 A.M. Mayor Al C. Ballard called the Meeting to order at 8:25 a.m. and declared that this meeting has been called jointly by the Redevelopment Agency and the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, for the purposes as shall be set forth below. Mayor Ballard presented Warner W. Hodgdon, Chairman. Mr. Hodgdon lead the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, and recited the Invocation. Mr. Hodgdon reported that this Special Meeting was held pursuant to a duly dated and signed Notice of Special Meeting which was mailed to each and every member in due time, form and manner as required by law. Said Notice was read as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA [ NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Rede- velopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at the Masonic Temple, Fourth and Arrowhead (Second Floor), in the City of San Bernar- dino, at 8:00 a.m., on the 13th day of January, 1969, for the following purposes: 1. To consider bids and award contract for excavation and site preparation of the public mall, commercial area, and parking lot. 2. To consider and authorize publication of invitation for bids for construction of the public mall. 3. Election of Officers 4. Public review of Redevelopment matters with the Mayor and Common Council, including: a. Central City Project b. Meadowbrook Project c. Propose projects DATED this 9th day of January, 1969. SIP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Executive Director 2. CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY o I. P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 9th day of January, 1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting on each 1029 and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL WITNESS my hand this 9th day of January, 1969. ] sIP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Executive Director Secretary Roll Call showed the following Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mayor Al C. Ballard; and the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino AWARD OF CONTRACT, UNIT NO.3, PHASE II, EXCAVATION & SITE PREPARATION, CALIF R-79: Bids for Unit No.3, Phase II (excavation and site preparation of the public mall, commercial area and parking lot) were opened December 31, 1968, at 4:00 p.m. Said bids are as follows: E. L. Yeager, Riverside Fontana Paving, Fontana Griggs-Norwood, Inc., Long Beach G. T. S. Co., Long Beach $216,000 222,222 207,500 256,300 , tIttIIIII The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 915 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CON- TRACT WITH GRIGGS-NORWOOD, INC., FOR SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO.3, PHASE II, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency has invited competitive sealed bids for Site Preparation, Unit No.3, Phase II, Calif. R-79, for the site preparation of certain areas in the project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Bernar- dino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino on the 12th and 19th day of December, 1968, and an Affidavit showing ~ .....ttil 1030 [ Such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m., on the 30th day of December, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Griggs-Norwood, Inc., in the sum of $207,500; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Griggs-Norwood, Inc., is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that sub}ect to approval of Contractor and bid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Griggs-Norwood, Inc., for the sum of $207,500, be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Unit No.3, Phase II, Site Preparation, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: l-le-69 [ Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 915 awarding the Contract for Unit No.3, Phase II, to the low bidder - Griggs-Norwood, Inc. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLIC MALL: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to publish the Invitation for Bids for the construction of the Public Mall. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 916 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NAaDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF INVITATION FOR BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLIC MALL, UNIT NO.2, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency Members do desire to let bids for Unit No.2, Calif. R-79, for the construction of the public mall, Central City Project, Calif. R-79 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to publish an Invitation for Bids for the Construction of the Public Mall, Unit No.2, Calif. R-79. Adopted: 1-13-69 [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 916, authorizing the inviting of bids for the construction of the Public Mall. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1031 ELECTION OF OFFICERS: J Mr. Hodgdon declared that this was the time and place designated for the ~xection of Officers for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. Mr. Wilson stated that he regreted that Mr. Hodgdon would not be with the Agency for the entire year of 1969. Mr. Wilson then nominated Mr. Hodgdon for Chairman. Mr. Wein seconded the nomination. Mr. Austin moved that the nominations for Chairman be closed; Mr. Webster seconded the motion. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein appointing Mr. Hodgdon as Chairman. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Hodgdon Absent: None The Chairman declared nominations open for Vice Chairman. Mr. Wein nominated Mr. Wilson for office of Vice Chairman. Mr. Webster seconded the nomination Mr. Austin moved the nominations for Vice Chairman be closed. Mr. Webster seconded the motion. Motion was made by We in and seconded by Webster appointing Mr. Wilson as Vice Chairman. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wilson Absent: None The Chairman declared the nominations open for the appointive offive of Secretary- Treasurer. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster appointing Mr. Quinn Secretary-Treasurer. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon NOes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLIC REVIEW OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MATTERS: J Mr. Hodgdon declared the election of Officers closed. Mr. Hodgdon stated that this is the time and place so designated for a public review of Agency matters by the Mayor and Common Council and all interested citizens. A transcript of the meeting was made and is on file in the Agency Records, and by this reference is hereby made a part of these minutes. There was much discussion regarding all aspects of Redevelopment; including - the Central City Project, the Meadowbrook Project, financing of said projects, the proposed Cultural Center and City Hall, the West End study area of R-79, and Conflict of Interest Charges. Mr. Hodgdon spoke on all aspects and answered questions. 12:30 p.m. - Mr. Webster was excused from the meeting 12:40 p.m. - Mr. Wilson was excused from the meeting At the close of all discussion, the Council expressed their appreciation for the joint meeting and stated that it had cleared up certain matters which has been questioned. It was determined that another meeting might be set for the near future to clear other matters which were not resolved or that should come up. , I -J 1032 [ ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Austin and seconded by We in to adjourn the meeting at 1:15 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Wilson. [ [ 1033 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ] The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 19, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 19, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Wilson, Austin, Wein, WEbster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Minutes of the Special Meeting of January 13, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein approving the Minutes of the Special Meeting of January 13, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None J EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the Month of December, 1968, were presented to the Members for approval. After review, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein approving the Expenditures for the month of December, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he had nothing to report at this time. Mr. Gresham, Condemnation Counsel R-79, reported as follows: a) Art Parlas ( Blk 7, Par 5 & 15): Set for trial February 3, 1969 b) Hiram Smith (Blk 7, Par 17 & 18): Trial set February 10, 1969. Gresham be- lieves everybody is in agreement and that we should have no difficulty acquiring the property. c) Mabel Aucutt (Blk 9, Par 1, 2, 3, & 11): Trial set for March 31, 1969. , I d) Joe Rose (Blk 20, Par 11): When we proceed to trial is up to the Board. ....J 1034 [ e) Jordan et. ale (Blk 3, Par 7, Markells): Findings of Fact were forwarded to the court 1-15-69. An approximate date of possession, if all proceeds well, is the middle of February. We would then be able to demolish build- ing upon vacation of premises by tenants. f) Masonic Temple (Blk 4, Par 23): Trial date to be set middle of February 1969. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Mr. Varner explained that the By-Laws of the Agency require that the Election of Officers take place at the first Regular Meeting each year. Therefore, it is necessary to ratify the Election of Officers which took place at the Special Meeting of January 13, 1969. The Chairman declared the monimations open for Chairman. Mr. Wein nominated Mr. Warner Hodgdon for Chairman. Mr. Austin seconded the nomination. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin to close the nominations. Mr. Hodgdon was then elected Chairman of the Agency for the year 1969, by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: Hodgdon Absent: None [ The Chairman declared the nominations open for Vice Chairman. Mr. Austin nominated Mr. Ray Wilson for Vice Chairman. Mr. Webster seconded the nomination. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster closing the nominations. Mr. Wilson was then elected Vice Chairman of the Agency for the year 1969, by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wilson Absent: None The Chairman declared the nominations open for Secretary-Treasurer. Mr. Wein nominated Mr. Pete Quinn for Secretary-Treasurer. Mr. Webster seconded the nomination. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster appointing Mr. Quinn, Secretary Treasurer of the Agency. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Hodgdon declared the Election of Officers closed. J. E. BONADIMAN & ASSOCIATES, CONTRACT AMENDMENT, R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to amend contract with J. E. Bonadiman & Associates by increasing the upset figure of the Contract $5,000. This will cover all engineering work to be accomplished in the Meadowbrook Project. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 917 c RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO CONTRACT WITH JOSEPH E. BONADIMAN & ASSOCIATES, FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has 1035 entered into a Contract with Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates for Engineering Services for the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO, dated August 22, 1960; and , -J WHEREAS, Contract Amendment No.1 was executed May 7, 1964; Contract Amend- ment No. 2 executed November 8, 1966; Contract Amendment No. 3 executed May 19, 1967; Contract Amendment No.4 executed June 19, 1967; Contract Amendment No. 5 executed December 12, 1967; and Contract Amendment No. 6 executed January 5, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the compensation of the Contractor to include all additional engineering work to be accomplished for the remainder of the Meadowbrook Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute Contract Amendment No. 7 with Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates increasing their contract compensation by $5,000 for all additional engineering services required for the Meadowbrook Project. Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption Resolution No. 917. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None of Ayes: EXPENDITURE TO CLEAR TITLE TO REUSE PARCEL 62, R-IO: ] Mr. Hodgdon explained that in order to deliver clear title of Reuse Parcel No. 62 to Greenwood Uniforms, developer for said parcel, it is found necessary to eliminate a concrete overrun of foundation from REuse Parcel 63. Authorization was requested to have this concrete removed, not to exceed the sum of $400. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 918 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN $400 TO CLEAR TITLE TO REUSE PARCEL 62, R-IO WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency have determined it necessary to eliminate a concrete footing spillover from the adjacent Reuse Parcel 62, R-IO, which encumbers a private driveway which the owners of Reuse Parcel 63 are con- structing; and WHEREAS, it is a requirement that the Agency deliver to a redeveloper free and clear property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than $400 to remove said concrete footing is hereby approved. ...... Adopted: 1-16-69 ..... 1036 [ Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 918. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR FREE RENT, VAUGHN~S CLEANERS, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 13, R-79: A request was presented for free rent for the mo.ths of a portion of September, all of October, November, and December, 1968, and January 1969, from Vaughn's Cleaners. Mr. Besoyan is scheduled to move into his new location within the next week. The rent for this period is approximately $150.00. After review of the circumstances, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 919 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FREE RENT FOR VAUGHN'S CLEANERS, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 13, R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has entered into a Rental Agreement of Block 4, parcel 13, R-79, with Vaughn's Cleaners as tenants; and [ WHEREAS, said Vaughn's Cleaners has requested free rent for a portion of September, 1968, all of October, November, and December, 1968 and all of Jan- uary 1969; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting held the 16th day of January, 1969, the Members reviewed the circumstances and determined that said request was propert. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to write off rent owed the Agency from Vaughn's Cleaners under rental agreement, for a portion of September, 1968, all of October, November, and December, 1968 and all of January 1969. Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 919. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None LAVINA WILLIAMSEN, CLAIM, R-79: [ A Claim was presented to the Members from Mrs. Lavina Williamsen, tosether with a letter opinion from Bruce Varner stating that the claim is without merit and accordingly it should be denied by the Members of the Agency. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein denying the Claim of Lavina Williamsen and directing Agency Counsel, Bruce Varner, to transmit a letter to Mrs. Williamsen advising her of the Board's decision. The motion was car- ried by the fOllowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Weln, Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1037 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, SUNSET HOTEL: ~ I 1 -J A request for extension of time on Rental Agreement until March 15, 1969, was presented to the Board from the Sunset Hotel. Mr. Hodgdon explained that Mr. Wein has agreed to move before the March 15, 1969 extension, should the tenants contiguous to his hotel so do. After review, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 920 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREE- MENT WITH SUNSET HOTEL UNTIL MARCH 15, 1969 WHEREAS, the Sunset Hotel has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Sunset Hotel has requested an extension of time on their Rental Agreement until March 15, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Members have reviewed the~circumstances involved and believe that such an extension is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Rental Agreement of the Sunset Hotel is hereby extended until March 15, 1969. , -" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Sunset Hotel shall move before March 15, 1969, if the tenants contiguous to the hotel so do. Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Weister and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 920 authorizing the extension of Rental Agreement until March 15, 1969 for the Sunset Hotel. Said extension shall stipulate that Mr. Wein will move earlier than March 15, 1969, if the tenants contiluouS to his hotel 80 do. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL 89, CLIFF BANGSUND: An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel 89 was presented to the Board. POC, Inc. Pro- poses to build Republic Van & Storage on said Lot. The parcel was pointed out on the map and the plan explained. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 921 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL 89, R-IO, TO POC, INC. .., ......; 1038 [ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8, and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of the Agency held January 16, 1969, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase submitted by POC, Inc. herein- after called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain parcel of real property described as: REUSE PARCEL NO. 89 [ BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block "D" of the Peppers,Subdivision, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, page 8 Records of said County, said point also being in the East line of Stoddard Avenue, 60.00 feet wide; thence South 164.9 feet along the East line of said Stoddard Avenue to a point in the North line of Congress Street, 60.00 feet wide; thence North 890 59' 21" East 282.78 feet along said North line of Congress Street to a point on a tangent curve concave to the North with a radius of 20.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 000 00' 39" West; thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 640 59' 21", an arc distance of 22.69 feet to a tangent line; thence North 250 00' 00" East, 71.88 feet along said tangent line to a point on a tangent curve concave to the West with a radius of 208.75 feet and a radial bearing of North 650 00' 00" West;.thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 250 00' 00", an arc distance of 91.08 feet to a point on the South line of the A.T. & S.F. Railroad, 50.00 feet wide; thence South 890 59' 25" West 350.83 feet along said South line of Railroad right-of-way to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 54403 square feet more or less. WHEREAS, at said Regular Meeting, held January 16, 1969, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land are in order and in conformance with the rules and regulations as esta- blished by the Department of Housing and Urban development for the disposition of project lands. c NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper is satisfactory; that negotiation is the appropriate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redeveloper pos- sesses the qualifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price, THIRTY SIX THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($36,850.00) is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and is not less than the resale price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1039 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted, subject to receipt from the developer of all necessary documents. Pursuant to the Agency's approval of all necessary documents, the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale and all other documents necessary to carry out the terms of the Agreement. ....., -..II Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 921. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.6, ED VADNAIS CONTRACT, CALIF. R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to execute Change Order No. 6 with Ed Vadnais, for Calif. R-IO. The changes were explained to the Members. After review, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 922 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.6 TO CONTRACT WITH EDMOND J. VADNAIS, UNIT NO. IB, R-IO .., ~ ......J WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Edmond J. Vadnais dated May 22, 1968 for Site Preparation, Unit No. IB, Calif. R-IO; and WHEREAS, the Agency entered into Change Order No. 1 the 21st day of June, 1968, Change Order No. 2 the 12th day of August, 1968, Change Order No.3, the 18th day of October, 1968, Change Order No. 4 the 7th day of November, 1968, and Change Order No. 5 was authorized November 21, 1968 by Resolution No. 884; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Contractor as shall be set forth in said Change Order NO.6. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Edmond J. Vadnais, to increase the services of the Contractor for an amount not to exceed $4,040.00. Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 922. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None ....., Absent: None ....,.; 1040 [ MARSTELLER, INC., ADDITIONAL BROCHURES: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization for a cost of $3,100 to the Agency. of these brochures was explained. introduced: to have an additional 5,000 brochures printed The division of expense for the purchase After review, the following resolution was RESOLUTION NO. 923 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT WITH MARSTELLER INC. FOR ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT BROCHURES OF SAN BERNARDINO REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California has by Resolution No. 877, executed contract with Marsteller Inc. for develop- ment brochures of San Bernardino Redevelopment Program; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to amend said Contract to include an additional 5,000 brochures, to be funded by the Agency, not to exceed $3,100.00. [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and 'Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to contract with Marsteller Inc. for an additional 5,000 brochures, to be funded by the Agency, not to exceed $3,100. Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 923. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.4, (GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY) STORM DRAIN DESIGN, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to enter into Change Order No.4 with contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy for Storm Drain Design. Said change will increase the contract price by $1,468. The changes were explained and reviewed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 924 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 4 WITH GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY, FOR STORM DRAIN DESIGN, CALIF. R-79 [ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a Contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas, and Troy for Storm Drain Design for the Central City Project, dated April 27, 1967; and 1041 WHEREAS, the Agency has entered into Contract Amendment No.1 on May 19, 1967, Contract Amendment No.2 on May 17, 1968; and Contract Amendment No.3 on October 3, 1968; and ..... 'f: .....J WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Agency to aaend said Contract to increase the services as set forth in Contract Amendment No.4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 4 to Contract by and between the Agency and Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy for Storm Drain Design, to increase the services for an amount not to exceed $1,468. Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 924. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.3 (GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY) STREET DESIGN, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon further requested that Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy's contract for Street Design be changed to include additional services amounting to $1,236. The., changes were explained and reviewed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 925 .., l ~ ..... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 3 WITH GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY, FOR STREET DESIGN, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a Contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas, and Troy for Street Design for the Central City Project, dated June 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, the Agency entered into Contract Amendment No. 1 on the 17th day of May, 1968, and Contract Amendment No. 2 on the 3rd day of October, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to Amend said Contract to increase the services as set forth in Contract Amendment No.3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 3 to Contract by and between the Agency and Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy for Street Design, to increase the services for an amount not to exceed $1,236. Adopted: 1-16-69 .., Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 925. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None --' [ [ [ -+-- 1042 EXTENSION OF TIME, REUSE PARCEL 82, R-IO, ELECTRIC AIR: Mr. Hodgdon explained that Electric Air has requested an extension of escrow and time of construction, due to a revision in elevations and an increase in building square footage. The extension was explained and discussed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 926 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF TIME ON AGREE- MENT OF SALE FOR REUSE PARCEL NO. 82, R-IO, ELECTRIC AIR WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 860, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 82, R-IO, to Electric Air; and WHEREAS, Electric Air has requested an extension of time on their Agreement due to a revision in elevation and an increase in building square footage; and WHEREAS, the Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that said extension is proper. ",- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, as follows: 1. It is understood and agreed between the parties hereto that Paragraph (l)(b) is hereby amended to read that the escrow shall be closed no later than April 1, 1969. All other provisions of said Paragraph (1) (b) remain in full force and effective. 2. Paragraph 3(a) is hereby amended to read that construction will be commenced no later than April 15, 1969. All other provisions of said Paragraph 3(a) remain in full force and effect. Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 926. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ANNUAL REPORT: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to publish an Annual Report in the Sun Telegram and Free Press on February 10, 1969 to inform the public of the pro- gress of the Meadowbrook and Central City Projects. All Members believed that such an Annual Report was needed and very informative to the public. The following resolution was introduced: 1043 ~ RESOLUTION NO. 927 l' .....i RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS TO PUBLISH AN ANNUAL REPORT IN LOCAL PAPERS WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to publish in the Sun Telegram and Free Press an Annual Report to inform the public of the Agency's progress of the Central City Project and the Meadowbrook Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of funds to publish an Annual Report in the Sun Telegram and Free Press is hereby approved, not to exceed the amount of $5,750.00. Adopted: 1-16-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 927. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.1, FONTANA PAVING, UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to execute Change Order No. 1 with contract with Fontana Paving, Unit No.4, R-79. The reasons for the requested change were explained to the Members. Said change will increase the contract by $7,260 and add an additional 10 days to completion date. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: ] RESOLUTION NO. 928 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 WITH FONTANA PAVING, UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Calfiornia, has entered into a Contract for Site Preparation of Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, with Fontana Paving dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor, not to exceed the sum of $7,260, and to add an additional 10 days for time of comple- tion to his contract; and WHEREAS, said increase in services shall be outlined in Change Order No.1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute Change Order No. 1 with Fontana Paving, Unit No.4, R-79, for an amount not to exceed $7,260. -, I i --' Adopted: 1-16-69 1044 [ Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 928. The motion was carried by the following votes to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: A letter was presented to the Members from Mr. David Jordan regarding a claim of water rights under property located at 560 Third Streets along with a letter from Mr. Varner stating that he is reviewing said matter and will report to the Board on same. Mr. Varner reported that he should have a recommendation by the next Regular Meeting on Mr. Jordan's claim. Mr. Quinn stated that Desert Provisions has closed escrow today and construction should start shortly. Bank of America has also closed escrow and construction should start by April 1, 1969. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 5:00 p.m. The motion was carried by the following votes to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilsons Weins Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None [ [ t 1045 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA --, J The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following; Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Wilson, Wein, Austin and Webster Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 16, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster ap- proving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 16, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he had nothing to report at this time. RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTIONS: J The following resolutions were introduced to satisfy audit findings: RESOLUTION NO. 929 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RETROACTIVELY RATIFYING TRAVEL TO LOS ANGELES AND BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA, NOVEMBER 3, 4, & 7, 1966, BY F. JAMES ARAGON, FORMER REAL ESTATE MANAGER OF AGENCY WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found essential to the continuing conduct of Agency business that former Agency employee, F. James Aragon, Real Estate Manager, travel to Los Angeles and Bakersfield, California, on November 3, 4, and 7, 1966; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino that the travel mentioned in preceeding paragraph was essential and expenses incurred in the amount of $63.00 are approved and retroactively ratified. .., -..II Adopted: 2-6-69 1046 [ Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 929. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 930 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RETROACTIVELY RATIFYING TRAVEL TO WASHINGTON, D. C. ON OCTOBER 10, 1967, BY THE CHAIRMAN OF AgENCY WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside the City of San Bernardino be specifi- cally authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found essential to the continuing conduct of Agency business that the Chairman travel to Washington D. C. to discuss the Central City Pro- ject progress with congressional and HUD representatives on October 10, 1967. [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that the travel mentioned in preceding paragraph was essential and expenses incurred in the amount of $320.78 are approved and retroactively retified. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 930. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 931 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 504 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN SCHEDULES ON THE AGENCY'S TENANT RENTAL POLICY WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 504 the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, established certain schedules in the said Agency's approved and adopted Tenant Rental Policy; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that said Agency's Tenant Rental Policy adopted by Resolution No. 504, requires amendment to conform with policies and procedures as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and [ WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting of the Agency held February 6, 1969, the Agency's Members approved and adopted an amendment to Agency's Tenant Rental Policy as outlined in attachment hereto and made a part hereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said amended Agency's Tenant Rental Policy is hereby approved and adopted by the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of 1047 the City of San Bernardino, to establish fair and equitable rents, taking into consideration the condition of the property, the condition of the project area, and the terms and conditions of occupancy. --, ~ ] ...... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Executive Director will be given the authority and charged with the responsibility for the establishment of fair and equitable. rents. Adopted: 2-6-69 REVISED FEBRUARY 6, 1969 AGENCY TENANT RENTAL POLICY When applicable, Rental Agreements will be executed and rental periods shall commence upon the day after the date the Agency acquires title and the right to possession of the property. Rental rates will be commensurate with the fair market value of the property which the tenant occupies in accordance with the terms of the Rental Agreement which is to be a month to month basis. All rents will be due and payable on the first day of each month, pursuant to the terms of the Rental Agreement. The delinquent rental notice and eviction actions will be in accordance with Tenant H.U.D. procedures as contained in Urban Renewal Manual and Letter provisions. A fair rental rate, at the time of acquisition, shall be established by the ] Executive Director or his designated representatives. Using the economic or ... reported rent as a basis, a fair and equitable rent will be established, . taking into consideration the condition of the property, the condition of the project area, and the terms and conditions of occupancy. Additional adjustments in rent must be requested in writing with full justification. Such requests will be reviewed by the Agency Board of Governors who will make the final decision. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 931. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None R-IO TAX ALLOCATION BOND SAVINGS ACCOUNT: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 932 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING BANK ACCOUNT WITH BANK OF CALIFORNIA TO BE DESIGNATED "MEADOWBROOK PROJECT AREA NO.1, TAX ALLOCATION BOND SAVINGS ACCOUNT" WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has been successful in selling its Tax Allocation Bonds for the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO; and ] 1048 [ WHEREAS, said Agency has received from Blyth & Company $4,750,000, and is desirous of temporarily investing said monies until such time as allocation of monies are made to the paying agent, and to the Project Expenditures Account of R-IO; and WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable to open a new account and such account shall be a savings account. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized on behalf of the Agency to open a new account with the Bank of California, to be designated "Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Tax Allocation Bond Savings Account". Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 932. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None MISSION HOTEL WRITE-OFF: A request was presented from the Mission Hotel for write-off of rent in the amount of $260. The following resolution was introduced: [ RESOLUTION NO. 933 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE WRITE-OFF OF RENT FROM THE MISSION HOTEL IN THE AMOUNT OF $260 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, executed Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Mr. Gus Piercy, dba Mission HOtel, the 16th day of December, 1967; and WHEREAS, due to misunderstanding, tenant continued paying rent to previous landlord after execution of Rental Agreement; and WHEREAS, legal proceedings were initiated in an effect to arrive at a compro- mise; and during said litigation, the back rent, in the amount of $260 was determined to be paid the Agency from the previous landlord; and WHEREAS, to date said back rent has not been collected. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the back rent of $260 is hereby determined un- collectable and authorized to be written off of the Agency's records. [ Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 933. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1049 DAVID EARL JORDAN, CLAIM OF WATER RIGHTS: This ITem tabled until later on the Agenda, because of the absence of Mr. Jordan CHANGE ORDER NO.1, DAKENO, UNIT NO. 23, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that Broadway Street from "H" West 250 ft., and Main from "H" approximate 125 feet should be removed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 934 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO.1 WITH DAKENO, INC., DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 23, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Dakeno Inc., for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 23, Calif. R-79, on the 20th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contracto~ to include the removal of Broadway Street from "H" west approximately 250 feet and the removal of Main Street from "H" Street west approximately 125 feet. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order NO.1 with Dakeno Inc., Unit No. 23, Calif. R-79, increasing the services of the contractor, not to exceed the sum of $2,661. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 934. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.2, DAKENO, UNIT NO. 22, R-79: Due to a party wall liability that exists between 548-554 and 560-566 West Third Street, the Chairman requested execution of Change Order No.2 giving Dakeno an additional 14 days on the contract completion time. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 935 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO.2 WITH DAKENO, INC., DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE UNIT NO. 22, CALIF. R-79 ...., J J ] 1050 r f '"- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California entered into a Contract with Dakeno Inc., for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 22, Calif. R-79, on the 20th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed on the 20th day of December, 1968 increasing the services of said Contract; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to execute Change Order No. 2 with Dakeno, Inc. for an extension of time due to a party wall liability that exists between 548-554 and 560~566 West Third Streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 2 with Dakeno Inc. for Unit No. 22, R-79, giving the Contractor 14 calendar days to complete demolition after the above men- tioned items has been restored. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 935. The motion was carried by the following vote,to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,... I ...... CHANGE ORDER NO.7, ED VADNAIS, UNIT NO. lB, R-lO: Due to adverse weather conditions, 21 days were requested to be added to Vadnais Contract. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 936 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 7 TO CONTRACT WITH EDMOND J. VADNAIS, UNIT NO. lB, R-lO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Edmond J. Vadnais dated May 22, 1968 for Site Preparation Unit No. lB, Calif. R-lO; and WHEREAS, the Agency entered into Change Order No.1 the 21st day of June, 1968; Change Order No. 2 the 12th day of August, 1968; Change Order No. 3 the 18th day of October, 1968; Change Order No. 4 the 7th day of November, 1968; Change Order No. 5 the 22nd day of November, 1968; and authorized Change Order No. 6 the 16th day of January, 1969 by Resolution No. 922; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to enter into Change Order No. 7 with Ed Vadnais allowing an additional 21 days to their contract due to adverse weather conditions; r- v ..... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby-authorized to execute Change Order No.7 with Edmond J. Vadnais, Unit No. lB, R-lO, allowing an additional 21 days to their contract completion date. Adopted: 2-6-69 1051 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 936. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .., ...J CHANGE ORDER NO.9, FONTANA PAVING, UNIT NO.3, PHASE I, R-79: Due to adverse weather conditions, 10 days. were requested to be added to con- tract with Fontana Paving. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 937 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 WITH FONTANA PAVING SITE PREPARA- TION UNIT NO.3, PHASE I, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving dated September 17, 1968 for Site Preparation Unit No.3, Phase I, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency executed Change Order No.1 the 20th day of September 1968; Change Order No. 2 the 4th day of October 1968; Change Order No. 3 the 17th day of October 1968; Change Order No. 4 the 25th day of October 1968; Change Order No. 5 the 8th day of November 1968; Change Order No. 6 the 22nd day of November, 1968; Change Order No. 7 the 6th day of December, 1968; and Change Order No. ___ 8 the 20th day of December 1968; and ..." WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to extend the contract completion date by 10 calendar days due to adverse weather conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 9 with Fontana Paving to increase the contract completion date by ten calendar days. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 937. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.1, FONTANA PAVING, UNIT NO. lC, R-IO A request was presented for an addition of 10 days on contract completion date for Fontana Paving, Unit lC, R-IO, due to adverse weather conditions. Mr. Hodgdon also stated that it is necessary to provide sewer laterals on Reuse Parcels 80 and 89, for an amount of $650.00 to be added to Fontana's contract price. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: ,...... - 1052 ~ j! i '-- RESOLUTION NO. 938 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WITH FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARA- TION UNIT NO. lC, Calif. R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving for Site Preparation of Unit No. lC, Calif. R-IO, dated the 2nd day of January, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to extend the contract completion date by 10 calendar days due to adverse weather conditions. WHEREAS, it is also the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Contractor to provide sewer laterals on Reuse Parcels 80 and 89, Calif. R-IO not to exceed the amount of $650.00. r I I i.- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California , that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 1 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No. lC, Calif. R-IO, increasing the contract completion date by 10 days due to adverse weather conditions, and increasing the contract price not to exceed the amount of $650.00 for additional services. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 938. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.2, Fontana Paving, Unit No.4, R-79: The Chairman requested authorization to execute Change Order No. 2 with Fontana Paving, Unit No.4, R-79. The changes were explained. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 939 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 WITH FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARA- TION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Dakeno Inc., for Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and r- WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed the 17th day of January, 1969 in- creasing the services of the contract; and " I' \..- 1053 WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the con- tractor for the addition of the ribbon and new concrete island nose as per Arrowhead Engineering's Drawing No. M-1-268, for the sum of $490, plus 2 additional days for said services; and 1 ~ -" WHEREAS, it is also the desire to increase the Contract an additional 40 days due to ten days of rain and the additional thirty days to allow the ground to dry. WHEREAS, due to said adverse weather conditions, emergency measures were required to preserve the work under construction and to protect surrounding property. Said work was done in accordance with Section 120, Care of Work, of the General Conditions of the Contract, and for the sum of $729.08. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 2 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No. 4, R-79, not to exceed the sum of $1,219.08, and increasing the contract completion date by 42 calendar days. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 939. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ..... FREE RENT, PET MOTEL, BLOCK 7, PARCEL 17: ..... Due to a decrease in business because of Agency construction within the area of his business, Mr. Stuart, dba The Pet Motel, requested free rent for the period of his occupancy. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 940 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FREE RENT FOR THE PET MOTEL, BLOCK 7, PARCEL 17, R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into Rental Agreement with Mr. David Stuart, dba the Pet Motel, for Block 7, Parcel 17, in the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stuart has requested free rent for his period of occupancy due to construction within the area of his business; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances and have determined that such a request is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that free rent for the Pet Motel, Block 7, Parcel 17, is hereby approved and authorized by the Agency Board. ..... -..J Adopted: 2-6-69 1054 r- ; '-- Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 940. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None FREE RENT, JACK'S BAR, BLOCK 7, PARCEL 17, R-79: Due to a decrease in business because of Agency construction with the area of his business, Mr. John Terando, dba, Jack's Bar, requested free rent for the period of his occupancy. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 941 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING FREE RENT FOR JACK'S BAR, BLOCK 7, PARCEL 17, R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Age~cy of the City of San Bernardino, California has entered into a Rental Agreement with Mr. John Terando, dba Jack's Bar, for Block 7, Parcel 17, in the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, Mr. Terando has requested free rent for his period of occupancy due to construction within the area of his business; and [ WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances and have determined that such a request is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that free rent for Jack's Bar, Block 7, Parcel 17, R-79, is hereby approved and authorized by the Agency Board. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made bylAustin and seconded by Wilson authorizing Resolution No. 941. The motion was carried by the following Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None None Absent: None the adoption of vote to wit: Abstention: OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL 81, R-IO: An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel No. 81, R-IO was presented to the Members from Everett and Mary Cisco, dba San Bernardino Glass and Mirror. The parcel was pointed out on the map and explained. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 942 ,... ~ ~ '-- RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO. 81. TO EVERETT AND MARY CISCO, CALIF. R-lO 1055 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and ..., ,-J WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8, and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of the Agency held February 6, 1969, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase submitted by Everett and Mary Cisco hereinafter called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain parcel of real property described as: REUSE PARCEL NO. 81 A portion of Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, Block "D", the Peppers, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, page 8, records of said County, des- cribed as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the South line of the North half of said Lot 9 and the East right-of-way line of "D" Street, (82.5 feet wide) established by Grant Deed to the City of San Bernardino recorded November 9, 1966, in Book 6726, page 490, official records of said County; thence North 89059'15" East, 283.07 feet along the south.line of the North half of said Lot 9 and said Lot 18 to a point; thence North 224.905 feet to its intersection with the North line of Lot 22 of said Subdivision; thence South 89059'21" West, 272.306 feet along said North line of said Lot 22 and said Lot 5 to its intersection with a non-tangent curve concave to the East with a radius of 258.75 feet and a radial bearing South 73024'35" East; thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 16035'25" an arc distance of 74.92 feet to a point in a tan- gent line; thence South 151.03 feet along said tangent line to the POINT OF BEGINNING ~ ...... Containing 63,404 square feet more or less. WHEREAS, at said Regular Meeting, held February 6, 1969, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land are in order and in conformance with the rules and regulations as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the disposition of project lands. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper is satisfactory; that negotiation is the appropriate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redeveloper possesses the qualifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price, THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED & FIFTY ($31,750) is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and is not less than the reuse price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. ...., .......J 1056 r"" i \- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted, subject to receipt from the developer of all necessary documents. Pursuant to the Agency's approval of all necessary documents, the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale and all other documents necessary to carry out the terms of the Agreement. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by/Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 942. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RECLASSIFICATION OF POSITION: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to amend the adopted Salary Schedule to delete the position of Architectural & Engineering Assistant and to add the position of Assistant Operations Officer, at $708 per month effective February 1, 1968. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 943 r- I L RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED SALARY SCHEDULE ADOPTED JUNE 15, 1967, TO DELETE THE POSITION OF ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING ASSISTANT AND ADD THE POSITION OF ASSISTANT OPERATIONS OFFICER WHEREAS, the Agency Members at a Regular Meeting held June 15, 1967, adopted the official Salary Schedule for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members desire to delete the position of Architectural and Engineering Assistant and replace it with the position of Assistant Operations Officer, Under Range 38 - Step A to be $708 per month. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the position of Architectural & Engineering Assistant is hereby deleted from the adopted Salary Schedule and the position of Assistant Operations Officer to hereby added to said Salary Schedule adopted June 15, 1967, and shall have a range scale of No. 38 - Step A to be $708 per month, effective February 1, 1969. Adopted: 2-6-69 ,.... 11. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing Resolution No. 943. The motion was carried by the following Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Absent: None the adoption of vote, to wit: Abstention: None f ~ - 1057 EXTENSION OF ESCROW REUSE PARCEL NO. 33, R-10: -. Mr. H~don stated that Hyman & George Shane have requested an extension of ex crow until March 1, 1969 in order that their Lessee could approve the pre- liminary plans. 'After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: ...... RESOLUTION NO. 944 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF EXCROW FOR REUSE PARCEL 33, R-IO, UNTIL MARCH 1, 1969 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 883, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel 33, Calif. R-IO, to Hyman and George Shane; and WHEREAS, escrow was opened for 60 days, the 12th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, a request has been submitted for an extension of escrow until March 1, 1969 in order for the lessee to approve the preliminary plans; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that such a request is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the extension of escrow on Reuse Parcel 33, R-IO, is hereby approved until March 1, 1969. ...... WIllI Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 944. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTION: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to Amend Resolution No. 909 to include Jim Lim's travel to New York with him on December 1y, 1968. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. ,..945 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 909 TO INCLUDE MR. JIM LIM'S TRAVEL TO NEW YORK, CINCINNATI, AND CHICAGO WHEREAS"Resolution No. 909 authorized the travel of Agency Chairman to New York on December 17, 1968; and ~ - 1058 r f ~ '-- WHEREAS, Mr. Jim Lim from Victor Gruen Associates, accompanied the Chairman on said trip to discuss the Penney Building with representatives from the Penney Company. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Resolution No. 909 is hereby amended to include the travel of Mr. Jim Lim of Victor Gruen Associates to New York, Cincinnati, and Chicago, and his travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. 302, Travel Policy, of the Agency. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 945. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO.1, WATER DEPARTMENT, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to amend contract with Water Department to provide water laterals to the three west parcels of the project. The amount of this change will be $2,500. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: ,-. I L RESOLUTION NO. 946 RESOLUTION OF THE RIDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT WITH SAN BERNARDINO WATER DEPART- MENT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California entered into a Contract with the City of San Bernardino Water Department for the construction and relocation of water facilities in the Central City Project, dated the 20th day of August, 1968; and WHEREAS, in order to provide water laterals to the three west parcels of the project, it is the desire of the Agency to amend said contract to include these parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Age~ to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 with the City of San Bernardino, Water Department for increase in services, for a sum not to exceed $2,500. Adopted: 2-6-69 r ........ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 946. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1059 OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCELS 76 & 77, R-lO: ~ An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcels 76 & 77, R-lO, was presented to the Members from Hanford Foundry Company. The proposed use was explained and the parcels pointed out on the map. The following resolution was then introduced: ..... RESOLUTION NO. 947 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO. 76 & 77 TO HANFORD FOUNDRY, COMPANY, CALIF. R-lO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on December 9, 10, 11, 12 & 13, and December 23, 24, 25, 26, i 27, 1968; and WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of the Agency held February 6, 1969, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase submitted by Hanford Foundry Company hereinafter called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain parcels of real property described as: ~ REUSE PARCELS 76 & 77 Lots 1, 2, and 3 and a portion of the vacated alley adjacent to and Southerly of said Lots 1, 2 and 3 all in Block 4 of J. W. Water's Jr. Subdivision per map recorded in Book 7 of Maps, Page 38, in the Office of the Recorder of said County and a portion of Boyd Avenue 60 feet wide, as vacated by City of San Bernardino Resolution No. 7811, recorded August 6, 1965 in Book 6448, Page 115, Official Records of said County, described as follows: ......, o Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 3; thence South 0 01'12" West along the East line of said Lot 3 and its Southerly prolongation, 145.00 feet to a line parallel with and distant 10.00 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the North line of Lot 7 in said Block '; thence South 89048'50" West along said parallel line, 162.89 feet to the center line of said vacated Boyd Avenue; thence North 0003'50" East along said center line, 145.00 feet to the Westerly prolongation of the North line of said Lots 1, 2 and 3; thence North 89048'50Y East along said Westerly prolongation and along said North line, 162.78 feet to the Point of Beginning. WHEREAS, at said Regular Meeting, held February 6, 1969, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land are in order and in conformance with the rules and regulations as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the dispo- sition of project lands. . ...., .....J 1060 [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper is satisfactory; that negotiation is the appropriate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redwveloper possesses the qualifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price, FIFTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($55,000) is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and is not less than the reuse price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted, subject to receipt from the developer of all necessary documents. Pursuant to the Agency's approval of all necessary documents, the:ehairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale and all other documents necessary to carry out the terms of the Agreement. Adopted: 2-6-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 947. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None [ DaVID E. JORDAN, CLAIM OF WATER RIGHTS, 560 THIRD STREET: Mr. David Earle Jordan was presented to the Board. Mr. Jordan stated that he and his mother are in possession of the water and pipeline easements and right-of-way rights of pSDperty located at 560 Third Street since the year 1886. Mr. Hodgdon explained to Mr. Jordan that a legal determination must be met before the Board can be in a position to do anything about his claim. After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein instruction the Agency Counsel, Bruce D. Varner, to meet with Mr. Jordan and determine the legal steps necessary to bring this claim to ramification, and to report his findings at the next Board Meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: The following was reported: Freeman Foster Meat Company - Closed escrow and are now in the process of receiving bids for construction Bank of Amer iea - Closed escrow. Construction to start April 1, 1969. r ...... Glaser Brothers - Under construction Hymann & George Shane - Escrow extended until March 1, 1969 1061 Reliable Bearing - Closed escrow Burcks Pringint - Closed escrow and are now in the process of receiving bids for construction. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 4:40 p.m. The aotion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,., ""'-'" .., I .~ ....,; -., ......., 1062 [ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA'" The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Wein, Austin and Webster Agency Members Absent: Wilson Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes for the meeting of February 6, 1969, were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Webster requested that the words REVISED FEBRUARY 6, 1969 be typed at the top of the revised Agency Tenant Rental Policy, revised by Resolution No. 931. Mr. Quinn stated that this would be done. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein approving the Minutes of February 6, 1969 as revised. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster Wein, Austin and Hodgdon. Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson [ EXPENDITURES: The expenditures for the Month of January, 1969 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the expenditures for the month of January, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson The expenditures for the month of January, 1969 for the Delmann Heights Project were submitted for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the Delmann Heights Expenditures for the month of January, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson CHANGE ORDER NO.7, SALATA CONSTRUCTION UNIT NO.1, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that a deletion of 60 lineal feet of 10 inch sewer lateral should be deleted for Salata's contract. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 948 [ RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO. 7 WITH PETER SALATA CONSTRUCTION INC., UN!T NO.1, CALIF. R-79 1063 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Peter Salata Construction Inc., dated May 2, 1968 for Site Preparation Unit No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency has entered into Change Order No. 1 the 26th day of August 1969; Change Order No. 2 the 4th day of October 1968; Change Order No. 3 the 17th day of October, 1968; Change Order No. 4 the 18th day of October, 1968; Change Order No. 5 the 8th day of November, 1968; and Change trder No. 6 the 20th day of December'll968; and WHEREAS,it is the desire of the Agency to delete the 60 lineal feet of 10 inch sewer lateral to be constructed in the intersection of Fourth and "E" Street due to interfering utility lines. Said deletion to be fa the amount of $600.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.7 with Salata Construction Co., decreasing the con- tract price by $600.00. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 948. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGIONAL ANNUAL CONFERENCE: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 949 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STAFF & BOARD MEMBERS TO TRAVEL TO SAN FRANCISCO TO ATTEND PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGIONAL ANNUAL CONFERENCE, MAY 18-20, 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found essential that certain Staff and Agency Board Hembers travel to San Francisco to attend the Pacific Southwest Regional Annual Conference to be held Hay 18-20, 1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that certain Staff and Agency Members are hereby authorized to travel to San Francisco, California, to attend the Pacific Southwest Regional Annual Conference, Hay 18-20, 1969, and their expenses are hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. 302 of the Agency. Adopted: 2-20-69 J J 1 -" 1064 r l.... Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 949. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson TYPEWRITER PURCHASE: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to purchase two electric IBM typewriters for the Agency. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 950 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN $760 lOll TWO NEW IBM TYPEWRITERS, MODEL 715 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency is in possession of two electric typewriters over five (5) years old; and WHEREAS, maintenance requirements on these typewriters is becoming more frequent and more expensive; and WHEREAS, HUD's table of useful life of this type equipment is five years. r- ~ ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than $760 for two IBM Electric Typewriters, Model 715, is hereby approved. '-- Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 950. The motion was carried by the fo~lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Abseilt: Wilson WRITE-OFF OF UNPAYABLE RENT: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agency has been unable to locate Mr. Truitt T. Davis and therefor is unable to pay him the $7.45 unused rent refund. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 951 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE WRITE-OFF OF RENT OWNED TO TRUITT T. DAVIS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $7.45 r ,,- ~ ...... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, on May 13, 1968 acquired property known as Block 16, Parcel 14, ada, 770 West Second Street; and _...'._"'M._..M.._._.!.......~ 1065 WHEREAS, claimant, Truitt T. Davis, moved from project area on or about June 7, 1968 leaving a $7.45 unused rent refund due; and ..., 1 ..... WHEREAS, all means to locate said claimant have been exhausted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the unused rent refund due to Truitt T. Davis ($7.45) is hereby authorized to be written off the Agency's Books as not payable as claimant cannot be located. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Austin and .econded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 951. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson CHANGE ORDER NO.1, GRIGGS-NORWOOD, UNIT NO.3, PHASE II, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to execute Change Order No. 1 with Griggs- Norwood Unit No.3, Phase II, R-79. The Change would be for fill dirt on parcels 80 and 89 in the Meadowbrook Project. Griggs-Norwood is now doing excavation work through their Unit No. 3 Contract, and they would empty the dirt they remove directly on parcels 80 and 89. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: . .... RESOLUTION NO. 952 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRE- TARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.1, TO CONTRACT WITH GRIGGS- NORWOOD, INC., UNIT NO.3, PHASE II, CALIF. R-79 ...., WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a contract with Griggs-Norwood, Inc., for the Site Preparation of Unit No.3 Phase II, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Contractor to include additional fill material on parcels 80 and 89 in the Meadowbrook Project; and WHEREAS, contractor has agreed to perform said services with excess material from excavation of Unit No.3, Phase II Contract, R-79, for the sum of $1,981.50. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change 8rder No.1 to contract with Griggs-Norwood Inc., Unit No.3, Phase II, R-79, not to exceed the amount of $1,981.50. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion .as made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso. ~ No. 952. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstenti.on: None Absent: Wilson ...... 1066 [ CHANGE ORDER NO.2, FONTANA PAVING UNIT NO. lC, R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon stated that it is the Agency's responsibility to finish grade and pave the remainder of the parking area of Reuse Parcel 69, R-IO, sold to Ken Bussey, to compensate Mr. Bussey for the difficulties encountered because of the design of Warm Creek Channel and City grading ordinances. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 953 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 WITH FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO. lC, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving for Site Preparation of Unit No. lC, Calif. R-IO, dated the 2nd day of January, 1969; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 was executed on the 7th day of February, 1969 for additional services; and ,... I L WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Contractor to finish grade and pave with 2" asphalt the remainder of the parking area of Reuse 69, of approximately 20,000 sq. ft., to compensate Mr. Ken Bussey, developer of Reuse Parcel 69, for the difficulties encountered because of the design of Warm Creek Channel, and city grading ordinances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 2 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation, Unit No. lC, R-IO, not to exceed the amount of $2,475.00. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 953. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, and Hodgdon Noes: Austin Abstention: None Absent: Wilson CHANGE ORDER NO.2, DEMOLITION & SITE CLEARANCE UNIT NO. 23, DAKENO, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to execute Change Order No. 2 with Dakeno Inc. Said change will be for the inclusion of Bloci 4, Parcels 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 21 (350-366 "F" Street). The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 954 r \.... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 WITH CONTRACT DAKENO, INC., DEMO,., AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 23, R-79 1067 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Contract with Dakeno, Inc., for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 23, Calif. R-79, on the 20th day of December, 1968; and ..., ...J WHEREAS, the Agency executed Change Order No. 1 the 7th day of February, 1969 for additional services; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to enter into Change Order No. 2 with Dakeno Inc. for the inclusion of Block 4, Parcels 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 21 (350- 366 "E" Street) for the amount of $15,000.00, and 20 additional days added to their contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hlR'ebJ authorized to execute Change Order 2 with Dakeno, Inc., Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 23, R-79, not to exceed the amount of $15,000.00, and adding 20 additional days to contract for said services. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 954. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT, PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH, REUSE 51, R-79: ., ~ ~ ...." The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 955 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, CALIF. R-79, REUSE PARCEL 51 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan fOr the Central City Proj ect, Calif. R-79, per- mits owner participation as to certain parcels of real property therein, in accordance with Sections 33701 and 33745 of the California Health and Safety Code; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Redevelopment Agency to retro-actively approve the execution of Owner Participation Agreement with Pacific Telephone and Tele- graph Company, Reuse Parcel 51, Calif. R-79, for the necessary construction and installation of site improvements for the project area as required in the Redeve- lopment Plan, and as set forth in the hereinafter referred to Owner Participation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Owner Participation Agreement executed February 12, 1969, by and between the Agency and Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company is hereby approved. ..., f ,~ , .....J Adopted: 2-20-69 1068 [ Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 955. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH, REUSE 51, R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 956 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF OWNER PARTICIPANTS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, CALIF. R-79 - REUSE PARCEL 51 WHEREAS, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a corporation, hereinafter called the Owner Participant, has entered into an Agreement with the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, hereinafter called the Agency; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated February 12, 1969, and recorded on February 21, 1969, in Book 7186, on Page 356, in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino, S~ate of California; and [ WHEREAS, in Section 5 of said Agreement, Owner Participant agrees to build upon and improve said land and such construction and improvements shall be carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code requirement of the City of San Bernardino, California and the State of California Bnd the provisions of the Plan and the Declaration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and specifications approved by the Agency on the hereinafter des- cribed real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agree- ment. Said real property is described as follows: PARCEL NO. 1 All that portion of Lot 5, in Block 4, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 1, records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the North line of said Lot 157 feet East of the North- west corner thereof;tthence South 9 rods; thence East to the West line of Stoddard Avenue, formerly Livingston; thence North along the west line of Stoddard Avenue 9 rods to Second Street; thence West to the point of beginning. PARCEL NO. 2 [ Tha t portion of Lot 5, Block 4, CITV OF. .SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Ber- nardino County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Haps, page 1, records of said County described as follows: 1069 BEGINNING at a point on the South line of Second Street 107 feet East of the North- west corner of said Lot 5; thence East along said South line 50 feet; thence South to the South line of said Lot 5; thence West along the South line of said Lot 5, 50 feet; thence North to the point of beginning. -, ....J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies, and gives notice that the Owner Participant has fully satisfied, ter- minated, and completed, for itself, its successors, and assigns, all covenants and agreements with respect to the Obligation of Owner Participant for the building upon and improvements to said land carried out in;conformity with the fire, health, and building code requirement of the City of San Bernardino, California, and the state of California and the provisions of the Plan and the Declaration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and specifications approved by the Agency and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement upon the hereinabove described real property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 956. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson .., I ...J ADOPTION OF SITE PLAN, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agency has come to an Agreement with J. C. Penney Company and Montgomery Ward Company. Penney's have agreed to build a 225,000 sq. ft. building, together with a 2~,000 sq. ft. Tire, Battery & Accessory Plant, and Montgomery Ward has agreed to build a 140,000 sq. ft. building, together with a 27,000 sq. ft. Tire, Battery, and Accessory Plant. Said companies have agreed to build eontigent upon the construction of a three level parking structure providing parking for approximately 4:1 cars per retail.les area of the mall. The Plans were shown to the Members and explained. After discussion, the fol- lowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 957 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OVERALL PLAN FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, INCLUDING J. C. PENNEY AND MONTGOMERY WARD IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER WITH PARKING STRUCTURE WHEREAS, for successful completion of the Central City Project appropriate major anchor tenants are required for the _11 complex; and ,., ! ....,J 1070 [ WHEREAS, the J. C. Penney Company and the Montgomery Ward Company have agreed to participate as major anchor tenants in the commercial portion of the Mall Complex; and WHEREAS, the Agreement of said companies to participate in said commercial por- tion of the Mall Complex has been made contigent upon the construction of a three level parking structure to provide parking for approximately four cars per every 1,000 sq. ft. of retail sales area of the commercial area, which parking structure will be located in the Northeast quadrant of the mall complex; and WHEREAS, in order to enable said companies to proceed with final architectural renderings and plans for the construction of their respective improvements an assurance regarding the construction of said parking structure is required by each of such companies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the location of the J. C. Penney Company, containing approximately 225,000 sq. ft., and the Montgomery Ward Company, containing approx- imately 140,000 sq. ft., contiguous to the Mall as set forth on the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit "All, is hereby approved; and r I L- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there will be an adjunctive 24,000 sq. ft. Tire, Battery & Accessory Service Center for the J. C. Penney Company, and an ad- junctive 27,999 sq. ft. Tire, Battery & Accessory Service Center for the Montgomery Ward Company as set forth on the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in giving said approval, the Agency recognizes the requirement to provide the parking structure hereinabove referred to; and BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agency will endeavor to construct said parking facilities in conjunction with the construction of the private commercial sector of the mall complex in order to insure simultane~us completion of all work involved. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the ado~tion of Resolution No. 957. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson Mr. Quinn was instructed to send copies of said Resolution to Mr. William Brown, Vice President of the John S. Griffith Company for his review and forwarding to Penney's and Montgomery Wards. CONTRACT VICTOR GRUEN, PLAN J. C. PENNEY AND MONTGOMERY WARD IMPROVEMENTS: [ Mr. Hodgdon explained that it is necessary to have plans drawn for the Penney and Montgomery Ward improvements. These plans are necessary in order that we have something to start working drawings from. The plans will include cross sections-levels-grades-etc. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: 1071 RESOLUTION NO. 958 ., i ....., RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR PLAN REFLECTING J. C. PENNEY AND MONTGOMERY WARD IMPROVE- MENTS, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency, has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No. I, Calif. R-79, with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and all amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the planning and execution of its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and . WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the services of a contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with a Plan reflecting the J. C. Penney Company and Montgomery Ward Company improvements, Central City, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting of the Agency held the 20th day of February, 1969, the Members found and determined that Victor Gruen Associates, Inc. was best qualified to perform the services so desired by the Agency. J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract with Vietor Gruen Associates for a Plan reflecting the J. C. Penney Company and Montgomery Ward Company Improvements, for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79, not to exceed the sum of $3,500. Adopted: 2-20-69 CONTRACT VICTOR GRUEN, DESIGN OF PARKING STRUCTURE, R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 959 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency, has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central Cfty Project Area No. I, Calif. R-79, with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the ..... Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and l all amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and I -J WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking 1072 [ certain activities necessary for the planning and execution of its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to enga&e the services of a contractor to render ceatain technical advice and asaistance in connection with the design of a three level parking structure for the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting of the Agency held the 20th day of February, 1969, the Members found and determined that Victor Gruen Associates Inc. was best qualified to perform the services so desired by the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract with Victor Gruen Associates for design of a three level parking structure, not to exceed the sum of $70,500. This fee covers complete architectural and engineering services with the exception of construction administration which is not included, and exclusive of $9,500 for exploratory design, which has been completed by contract of August 1, 1967. Adopted: 2-20-69 r ~ ~ Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution 959. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson APPLICATION FOR AMENDATORY LOAN AND GRANT CONTRACT, R-IO AND R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Economic Development Administration, Washington, D. C., has designated the County of San Bernardino as an Overall Economic Development Program (OEDP) area. This enables the Agency to amend the Loan and Grant Contracts from 2/3:1/3 participation to 3/4:1/4 participation. After discussion, the following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 960 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDATORY LOAN AND GRANT CONTRACT, CONVERTING PROJECT NO. R-IO FR~M 2/3:1/3 TO 3/4:1/4 PARTICIPATION WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, avail itself of the financial assistance provided by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, to carry out the urban renewal project described as Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO; and r i I '-- WHEREAS, on the 20th day of February, 1968, by Resolution No. 50, and amended by Resolution No. 63 on August 22, 1958, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorized the filing of the Application for Loan and Grant Contract for Proj ect No. Calif. R-IO; and 1073 ...., WHEREAS, it is recognized that the Federal Contract for such financial assistance pursuant to said Title I will impose certain obligations and responsibilities upon the Local Public Agency and will require among other things (1) the provision of local grants-in-aid; (2) a feasible method for the relocation of families displaced from the project area; and (3) other local obligations and responsibili- ties in connection with the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects; and 1. Ai -" WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino has been notified by letter dated June 28, 1968 from the Economic Development Administration, Washington, D. C., that said County has been designated as a Redevelopment Area under the provisions of Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965; and WHEREAS, said designation authDrizes Urban Renewal Loan and Grant Contract Amenda- tories from 2/3:1/3 participation to 3/4:1/4 participation; and WHEREAS, it is necessary in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino avail itself of the financial assistance provided by Title IV designation; and WHEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the regulations of the De- partment of Housing and Urban Development effectuating that Title, provided that no person shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discriaination in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects assisted under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and ., ~ ...., WHEREAS, the objectives of the Urban Renewal Plan cannot be achieved through rehabilitation of the Project irea: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that an Application for Amendatory Loan and Grant Contract, Calif. R-10 be submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development to convert the financial participation to 3/4:1/4. 1. That the United States of America and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, with regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 2. That an amendatory application on,behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an Amendatory to the existing Loan and Grant Contract with the Federal Government, dated October 23, 1958, as amended for a Total project capital grant substantially in the amount of $2,159,325 (an increase of -0-) and a total Project Temporary Loan through direct or private financing under the existing Loan and Grant Contract of $4,949,365 (an increase of -0-), for undertaking and financing the Project is hereby approved, and the Executive Diredctor iSAherleibY aiuthoriihzedhandD directed tOf eHxecuite andd utobafilDe SUClb an t .., Amen atorypp cat on w t t e epartment 0 ous ng an r neve opment 0 i provide such additional information and to furnish such documents as may be re- ..J quired on behalf of the Agency, and to act as the authorized correspondent of the f.-..----.- 1074 r L Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 960. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson RESOLUTION NO. 961 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION- FOR AMENDATORY LOAN AND GRANT CONTRACT, CONVERTING PROJECT NO. R-79 FROM 2/3:1/3 TO 3/4:1/4 PARTICIPATION WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, avail itself of the financial assis- tance provided by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, to carry out the urban renewal project described as Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and r L WHEREAS, it is recognized that the Federal Contract for such financial assistance pursuant to said Title I will impose certain obligations and responsibilities upon the Local Public Agency and will require among other things (1) the provision of local grants-in-aid; (2) a feasible method for the relocation of families dis- placed from the project area; and (3) other local obligations and responsibilities in connection with the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects; and WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino has been notified by letter dated June 28, 1968 from the Economic Development Administration, Washington, D. C., that said County has been designated as a Redevelopment Area under the 'lprovisions of Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965; and WHEREAS, said designation authorizes Urban Renewal Loan and Grant Contract Amendatories from 2/3:1/3 participation to 3/4:1/4 participation; and WHEREAS, it is necessary in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino avail itself of the financial assistance provided by Title IV designation; and WHEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating that Title, provided that no person shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be ex- cluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to dis- crimination in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects assisted under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and r L- WHEREAS, the objectives of the Urban Renewal Plan cannot be achieved through rehabilitation of the Project Area: 1075 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that an Application for Amendatory Loan and Grant Contract, Calif. R-79, be submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development to convert the financial participation to 3/4:1/4. --, " ii Jl ....,j 1. That the United States of America and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, with regu- lations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 2. That an amendatory application on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an Amendatory to the existing Loan and Grant Contract with the Federal Government, dated March 21, 1967, as amended for a total project capital grant substantially in the amount of $21,087 (an increase of $5,863,143), and a total Project Temporary Loan through direct or private financing under the existing Loan and Grant Contract of $33,705,767 ( an increase of $5,863,143) for undertaking and financing the Project is hereby approved, and the Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to file such an Amendatory Application with the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment to provide such additional information and to furnish such documents as may be required on behalf of the Agency, and to act as the authorized correspondent of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Adopted: 2-20-69 ., i ...J Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 961. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES EAST OF "E" STREET, CALIF. R-79 Hr. Hodgdon explained that it now is important for the Agency to start acquiring the property east of "E" Street. After discussion, the fOllowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTIO~ NO. 962 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES EAST OF "E" STREET, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 665, adopted April 18, 1968, resolved that the acquisition of property in the Central City Project, easterly of "E" Street must be authorized by Board approval; and WHEREAS, it is now determined that said acquisition of property east of "E" Street is now feasible. .... t -J 1076 "... ! L... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the acquisition of property in the Central City Project, easterly of "E" Street is hereby authorized by the Agency Board. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 962. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson CONDEMNATION, BLOCK 1, PARCELS 4, 5, I 6 (Wright), R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 963 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 1, CALIF. R-79 IBlock 1, Parcels 4, 5., C 6 Wright) [ BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of exist- ing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other streetimprovements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 1, Parcels 4, 5, and 6 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 2-20-69 1071 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 963. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson 1 ...I OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Wein inquired whether or not the Agency would be constructing a portion of the parking lot on the property north of Third Street and West of "E" Street, after demolition. Mr. Hodgdon stated that we would not construct the parking lot at that portion of the project area until construction of the mall itself. We have ample parking downtown now, and construction of the mall should be started within 180 days. Mr. Austin asked what tenants still remained in the mall area. Mr. Quinn stated that tenants remain at the Masonic Temple, the Aucott property and the Hartfield building . Mr. Terrill Spoor was introduced to the Members. Mr. Spoor has been nominated to the City Council to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Hodgdon upon his accepted resignation by the Council. Mr. Spoor's appointment will be placed on the Council Ag'enda for next Monday, February 24, 1969. Mr. Hodgdon stated that there are several resolutions he would like to have con- sidered before he leaves the Agency Chairmanship. They are~as follows: Contract, Victor Gruen, San Bernardino Core Area: , ..J Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 with Victor Gruen Associates Contract for Planning Study of the San Bernardino Core Area. Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Central City Committee along with the Agency would like to increase the services of Victor Gruen to include 800 copies of the Central City North Report and 800 copies of the Central City South Report, not to exceed the sum of $1.700, to be reimbursed to the Agency by the Central City Committee, as so set forth in the Contract. The fOllowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 964 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY Tef EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR PLANNING STUDY OF THE SAN BERHABDINO CORE AREA WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 758, adopted July 2, 1968, authorized the execution of a contract with Victor Gruen Associates for a Planning Study of the San Bernardino Core Area, said contract dated the 23rd day of July, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Central City Committee has agreed to reimburse the Agency for said administrative contract with Victor Gruen Associates; and ~ ....... 1078 [ WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency and the Central City Committee to in- crease the services of the Contractor to include 800 copies of the Central City North Report and 800 copies of the Central City South Report, not to exceed the sum of $1,700, to be reimbursed to the Agency by said Central City Committee.' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to contract with Victor Gruen Associates increasing the contract price not to exceed $1,700.00, for 800 copies of the Central City South Report and 800 copies of the Central City North Report. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said increase in contract price shall be reimbursed to the Agency from the Central City Committee. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 964. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson [ Contract, Victor Gruen, San Bernardino State College Area: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to execute Contract Amendment No.1 with Victor Gruen Contract for Planning SUBVey in connection with the San Bernardino State College Area. He explained that Inland Action Inc. along with the Agency desire to increase the services of the Contractor to include the College Area Report and College Area Model, not to exceed the sum of $2,500, to be reimbursed to the Agency by Inland Action, as so stated in their contract. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 965 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR PLANNING SURVEY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAN BER- NARDINO STATE COLLEGE AREA WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a Contract dated the 11th day of September, 1968, with Victor Gruen Associates for a Planning Survey in connection with the San Bernardino State College Area; and WHEREAS, Inland Action Inc. has agreed to reimburse the Agency for said adminis- trative contract with Victor Gruen Associates; and [ WHEREAS, the Agency and Inland Action Inc. desire to increase the services of the Contractor to include the College Area Report and College Area Model, not to exceed the sum of $2,500, to be reimbursed to the Agency from Inland Action. 1079 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San 1 Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized ., ... to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to contract with Victor Gruen Associates ... increasing the services of the Contractor for an amount not to exceed $2,500.00, which sum shall be reimbursed to the Agency from Inland Action Inc. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 965. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson Contract, Victor Gruen, Hall Design: Authorization was requested to execute Contract Amendment with Victor Gruen Con- tract for Mall design to include 6,000 colored illustrative copies of the overall San Bernardino area for promotional data. After discussion, the following reso- lution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 966 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR HALL DESIGN ... ~ .."J WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, under date of March 22, 1967, entered into a contract with Victor Gruen Asso- ciates for engineering services for the Mall Design, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to &atain from Victor Gruen 6,000 colored illus- trative copies of the overall San Bernardino area for promotional data. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract Amendment with Victor Gruen Associates for Hall Design, to include 6,000 colored illustrative copies of the overall San Bernardino area for promotional data, not to exceed the sum of $3,500. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 966. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson Contract, Victor Gruen, Mall Model: Authorization was requested to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 with Victor Gruen Associates for Contract for the Hall Model, to increase the contract price, not to exceed $2,000, for reconstructing portions of the present model, ,., j " ...J 1080 r '-- wherein some buildings which now appear as simple wood block will be reconstructed to take on the appearance of their actual form and character. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 967 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES, FOR THE MALL MODEL WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Victor Gruen Associates for the construction of a Mall Model of the Central City Project, dated the 26th day of September, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the contract price, not to exceed $2,000, for reconstructing portions of the present model, wherein some buildings which now appear as simple wood blocks will be reconstructed to take on the appearance of their actual form and character. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute Contract Amendment No. 1 to contract with Victor Gruen Associates, for the Mall Model, not to exceed the sum of $2,000. [ Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 967.i The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: ,None Absent: Wilson Modification of Canvas Cover Mall Model: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 968 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF $10.60 TO PROVIDE EOR A MODIFICATION OF THE CANVAS COVER FOR THE MALL MODEL WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency Board to provide for a modified canvas cover for the Mall Model of the Central City Project, for the sum of $10.60. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of $10.60 is hereby approved, to provide for a new canvas cover for the San Bernardino Central City Mall Model. [ Adopted: 2-20-69 1081 Motion was made by We in and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of resolution No. 968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None ~',Absent: Wilson Photographs of Mall Model: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to purchase photographs of the reconstructed Mall Model for promotional data. The importance of these photographs were ex- plained to the Members. After discussion, the following ~esolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 969 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN $1,500.00 FOR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE HALL MODEL WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency Board to purchase photographs of the re- constructed Mall Model for promotional data. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than $1,500 is hereby authorized for the purchase of new photographs of the reconstructed Mall Model of the Central City Project. Adopted: 2-20-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adopt&in of Resolution No. 969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, and Hodgdon Noes: Austin Abstention: None Absent: Wilson ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein to adjourn the meeting at 5:20 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson ] .., J --. J 1082 D MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOP~ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA The Vice Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:06 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Wilson, Wein and Webster Agency Members Absent: Austin Also Present: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; and Mrs. Register, Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes Members for the Minutes was carried Noes: None of the Regular Meeting of February 20, 1969 were presented to the approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving of the Regular Meeting of February 20, 1969 as submitted. The motion by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein and Webster Abstention: None Absent: Austin REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: [ Mr. Varner stated that he had nothing to report at this time. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, GEORGE AND HYMAN SHANE, REUSE PARCEL 35, CALIF. R-10: The following resolution was intr04uced: RESOLUTION NO. 970 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO GEORGE SHANE AND HYMAN SHANE WHEREAS, George Shane and Hyman Shane, hereinafter called the Redevelopers, have entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; arid ~4" WHEREAS~ said Agreement, dated March 8, 1968, was recorded on May 23, 1968, in Book 7031 on page 211 and said Grant Deed, dated March 8, 1968, was recorded on May 23, 1968, in Book 7031 en page 204, both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and [ WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redevelopers covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and 1083 WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Deed to furnish the Redevelopers with an instrument certifying completion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof; and ~ ! ..J WHEREAS, said real property is described as: Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, in Block 3, BEDFORD BROS. SUBDIVISION, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per~plat recorded in Book 8 of Maps, page 30, records of said County, together with the North!1/2 of the 15 foot alley adjoining said lots on the South, as vacated by Resolution No. 6146 of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on November 6, 1961, a certIfied copy of such Resolution being recorded in Book 5586, page 234, Official Records. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED in accordance with Section 4 of said Agreement and Section 4 of said Grant Deed, that the Agency does hereby conclusively certify and give notice that the Redevelopers have fully satisfied, terminated, and com- pleted, for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agreements with respect to the obligation of Redevelopers for the construction of improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinafter described real property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute aDd have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". ..... i ~ .....J Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster .uthorizi.g the adoption of Resolution No. 970. The motion was carried by the following vo*e to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin Mr. Austin arrived at 4:10 p.m. Wilson read letter from Warner W. Hodgdon, announcing his resignation as Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency Board to Mayor and Common Council. Mr. Hodgdon's resignation was accepted February 24, 1969 at 8:00 a.m. by Mayor Al C. Ballard. Wilson requested that a copy of this letter be attached to the minutes of this meeting for public ~ecord. Hr. Wilson stated that although the Agency Bylaws required an election of Agency Officers to fill the unexpired term of the Chairman, he recommended that this election be held in abeyance until the next regularly scheduled meeting on March 20, 1969, in order to give the Mayor an opportunity of selecting a new member of the Agency Board of Directors to fill Mr. Hodgdon's unexpired term on the Agency Board. Mr. Varner stated that in accordance with the Agency Bylaws, the Vice Chairman assumes the position as Chairman in the absence of the elected Chairman ~ or in the event the Chairman resigns his position. i .....J 1084 [ Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein setting March 20, 1969, as the date for Agency election of officials to fill the unexpired term of Chairman of the Agency Board of Directors. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Wilson directed the Secretary to indicate in the Agency's records that Mr. Hodgdon's resignation was effective February 24, 1969. WITNESS SERVICES, MR. ROBERT HILL, CONDEMNATION ACTION, BLOCK 11, PARCELS 1 THROUGH 5 AND BLOCK 12, PARCELS 1, 2 AND 3: Mr. Quinn requested authorization to enter into a contract with Mr. Robert Hill to assist the Agency in forthcoming condemnation trial actions. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 971 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ENTERING INTO OF A CONTRACT WITH ROBERT G. HILL, FOR WITNESS SERVICES INVOLVED IN THE CONDEMNATION ACTION OF BLOCK 11, PARCELS 1 THROUGH 5 AND BLOCK 12, PARCELS 1, 2 & 3 (ROBERT & JOSEPHINE LEWIS) ,... . ! ..... WHEREAS, it has been resolved by Resolutions No. 718 and 719 of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Real Property hereinafter described as Block'll, Parcels 1 through 5, and Baock 12, Parcels 1, 2 and 3, is necessary for the public uses and purposes of said Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, Eminent Domain proceedings has been instituted regarding said property; and WHEREAS, Robert G. Hill is a qualified Appraiser and is qualified as an expert witness in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Agency desires to utilize the services of said Robert G. Hill as an expert witness in the above mentioned Eminent Domain proceeding. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Executive Director, P. W. Quinn, Jr., and the Vice Chairman of said Agency, Ray M. Wilson, be authorized to enter into a contract with said Robert G. Hill providing for his services as an expert witness in connection with said Eminent Domamn Proceeding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that compensation to be paid to said Robert G. Hill, will not exceed $150.00 per day or $75.00 per half day. [ Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 971. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ..L 1085 FONTANA PAVING COMPANY, UNIT NO. lC, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-lO: .... ~, J ~ Authority was requested to execute Change Order No. 3 to contract with Fontana Paving Company to provide for a temporary drive approach due to re- moval of "D" Street and to provide for driveway approaches for Reuse Parcels 80 and 89. The following resolution was introduced: ..... RESOLUTION NO. 972 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO CONTRACT WITH FONTANA PAVING, UNIT NO. lC, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Ca14fornia, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving for Site Preparation of Unit No. lC, Calif. R-lO dated the 2nd day of January, 1969; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed on the 7th day of February, 1969 for additional services; and Change Order No. 2 was authorized the 20th day of February, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Change Order No.3, providing for a temporary drive approach, due to the removal of "D" Street; and also pro- viding for driveway approaches for Reuse Parcels 80 and 89, for a sum not to exceed $816.23; and ~ I -J WHEREAS, due to adverse weather conditions, it is recognized by the Agency Board that an additional 15 days should be added to Fontana Paving contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 3 iith Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No. lC, R-lO, not to exceed the amount of $816.23, and increasing the time of completion 15 days. Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 972. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DISPOSITION AGREEMENT, HENRY HENSCHEL, REUSE PARCELS 23 THROUGH 32, CALIF. R-IO: Mr. Henschel appeared before the Agency Board to state that he had received a proposed disposition agreement for Reuse Parcels 23 through 3' in Meadowbrook Project. Mr. Henschel discussed the financing through FHA of his proposed develop~ent. He stated that at the present time, Federal financial assistance was being held in abeyance; however, that he was Number 1 and 2 on the financial allotment when federal funds were released. He further felt these funds would be released in the very near future. Mr. Henschel stated that his project con- sisted of two projects: one for senior citizens and one for low rise family walk-ups. The Agency suggested that Mr. Henschel consider his projects in a two phase concept. One phase was to have construction started on or before December 31, 1969 and the other to be started prior to the first Agency meeting ..... - ..".,..... ~ 1086 r-- L in April, 1970, or forfeit interest in that parcel. Mr. Henschel agreed to these proposals and the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 973 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP_ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO DISPOSITION CONTRACT FOR MEADOW- BROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-lO, REUSE PARCELS 23 THROUGH 32 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino at its Regular Board Meeting on March 7, 1968 adopted Resolution No. 628 authorizing the sale of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32 to Henry S. Henschel and Robert J. Erwin. WHEREAS, the Redevelopers of the subject parcels are necessitated by the re- quirements of the Federal Housing Administration and the Department of Housing and Urban Development to develop the parcels under two distinct separate sections of the housing code, namely 221 and 236. WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that it is in the best interest of said Agency and the City of San Bernardino that these selections be separated to facilitate the immediate development of the parcels. '-' BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino hereby authorizes the redeveloper to construct the improvements upon the subject::.parcels in separate stages. The first stage shall have construction started on or before December 31, 1969 and the other shall have construction startedpprior to the first Agency meeting in April, 1970, or the Re~eveloper shall forfeit their interest in that parcel. ~ 1l . \1 i) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Vice Chairman and the Secretary of the Agency be authorized to enter into an appropriate disposition contract with said redevelopers as approved by the Agency's legal counsel. Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 973. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES, PARKING DESIGN AND SITE WORK, R-79: Mr. Dan Branigan, Victor Gruen Associates appeared before the Agency Board and gave a brief run-down on activities Victor Gruen is undertaking for the Agency. Mr. Branigan also discussed the J. C. Penney Company and Montgomery Wards pos- sible entry into the project. As a result, additional site work and design is required. The following resolution was introduced: r i \.....- 1087 RESOLUTION NO. 974 ,..... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO VICTOR GRUEN'S CONTRACT FOR PARKING DESIGN TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL SERVICES --* WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has entered into a contract dated the 8th day of December 1967 with Victor Gruen Associates for Parking Design for the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, said Contract was amended by Contract Amendment No.1, dated the 1st day of May, 1968, Contract Amendment .No. 2 dated the 16th day of September, 1968; and Contract Ameddment No. 3 dated the 19th day of November, 1968; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Contract Amendment No.4, increasing the services of the Contractor as set forth in their letter of February 28, 1969 and as shall be incorporated in said Contract Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Vice Chait'lllan and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 4 with Victor Gruen Associates, increasing the service of contractor as set forth in said letter dated February 28, 1969. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an equitable adjustment of the contract price, not to exceed $11,500.00 for this Contract Amendment No. 4 shall be incorporated in said Contract Amendment. ~ ......., Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 974. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER, FONTANA PAVING, UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 975 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 WITH FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving, ~or Site Preparation Unit NO.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and ~ WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed the 17th day of January, 1969 and Change Order No. 2 was executed the 7th day of February, 1969; and - 1088 ~ f L WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the con- tractor for the excavation of soil that has turned into silt and replacing it with class 2 base material; and WHEREAS, the contractor has agreed to share the additional expenses to impDDt the base material, of which the estimated cost of $3,863 would be $1,931.50 for the Agency's share. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 3 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit NO.4, R-79, for additional services in an aaount estimated to be the sum of $1,931.50. Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 975. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REIMBURSEMENT OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS OF "D" STREET BETWEEN RIALTO AND ATHOL STREETS: The following resolution was introduced: [ RESOLUTION NO. 976 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO REIMBURSE THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AT "D" STREET BETWEEN RIALTO AND ATHOL STREET WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has entered into a contract with Fontana Paving Inc. for site preparation unit lC, Meadow- brook Project Calif. R-lO, in order to reconstruct "D" Street on both sides of the Santa Fe right-of-way, WHEREAS, the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California under application #50146 authoiized a crossing of the railroad property on behalf of the City of San Bernardino and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, WHEREAS, under decision #74515 the Public Utilities Commission ruled that the applicant must pay for the improvements which the Santa Fe R.R. Co. will under- take and has estimated to cost $31,852.00. [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to reimburse the City of San Bernardino for the improvements installed by the Santa Fe R.R. Co. at the "D" Street crossing between Athol Street and Rialto Avenue. That upon completion of the work to be done by Santa Fe as specified in an agreement with the City, Santa Fe will render the City of San Bernardino 1089 a bill for the actual aosts thereof upon which the Agency will promptly reimburse the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the Agency will reimburse the City for the actual cost as submitted and verified by the Santa Fe Railroad Company now estimated to cost $31.852.00. ~ --' Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 976. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Wein. Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER. EDMOND J. VADNAIS. UNIT NO. lB. R-IO: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 977 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 TO CONTRACT WITH EDMOND J. VADNAIS. UNIT NO. lB. R-IO ~ WHEREAS. the Redevelopment AgBncy of the City of San Bernardino. California entered into a contract with Edmond J. Vadnais dated May 22. 1968 for Site Preparation Unit No. lB. Calif. R-IO; and --' WHEREAS. the Agency entered into Change Order No.1 the 21st day of June. 1968; Change Order No. 2 the 12th day of August. 1968; Change Order No. 3 the 18th day of October. 1968; Change Order No. 4 the 7th day of November. 1968; Change Order No. 5 the 22nd day of November. 1968; Change Order No. 6 the 16th day of January. 1969; and authorized Change Order No. 7 the 7th of February. 1969 by Resolution No. 936; and WHEREAS. it is the desire of the Agency to enter into Change Order No. 8 with Edmond J. Vadnais allowing an additional 21 days to their contract due to adverse weather conditions; NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED. by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.8 with Edmond J. Vadnais. Unit No. lB. R-IO allowing an additional 21 days to their contract completion date. Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 977. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Wein. Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ ....- 1090 [ AMENDATORY APPLICATION, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Austin brought up in discussion that Resolution No. 961 which was approved by the Board on February 20, 1969 did not specifically authorize the Secretary to submit an Amendatory Application for R-79 which dealt with pooling credits from R-IO and increase the budget line item pertaining to interest in R-79. Mr. Austin recommended that Resolution No. 961 be rescinded and a new resolution embodying not only the conversion to 3/4:1/4 participation, but also include the above two additional items. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 978 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLI- CATION FOR AMENDATORY LOAN AND GRANT CONTRACT, CONVERTING PROJECT NO. R-79 FROM 2/3:1/3 TO 3/4:1/4 PAR~ICIPATION WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, avail~itself of the financial assist- ance provided by Title I of the Housing Act of J949, as amended, to carry out the urban renewal project described as Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and [ WHEREAS, it is recognized that the Federal Contract for such financial assistance pursuant to said Title I will impose certain obligations and responsibilities upon the Local Public Agency and will require among other things (1) the provision of local grants-in-aid; (2) a feasible method for the relocation of families displaced from the project area; and (3) other local obligations and responsibili. ties in connection with the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal pro- jects; and WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino has been notified by letter dated June 28, 1968 from the Economic Development Administration, Washington, D. C., that said County has been designated as a Redevelopment Area under the provisions of Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965; and WHEREAS, said designation authorizes Urban Renewal Loan and Grant Contract Amendatories from 2/3:1/3 participation to 3/4:1/4 participation; and WHEREAS, it is necessary in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino avail itself of the financial assistance provided by Title IV designation; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency now desires to take advantage of the pooling credits from Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO for Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and [ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency now desires to increase projected interest costs as a budget item from $627,564 to $3,553,164 for an increase of $2,925,600 to assist in providing for adequate project financing. 1091 WHEREAS. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. and the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating that Title. provided that no person shall. on the ground of race. color. or national origin. be excluded from participation in. be denied the benefits of. or be subject to discrimination in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects assisted under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949. as amended; and ~ -i WHEREAS. the objectives of the Urban ReDBwal Plan cannot be achieved through rehabilitation of the Project Area: NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. that an Application for Amendatory Loan and Grant Con- tract. Calif. R-79. be submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development to convert the financial participation to 3/4:1/4. 1. That the United States of America and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary be. and they hereby are. assured of full compliance by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. with regu- lations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 2. That an amendatory application on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an Amendatory to the existing Loan and Grant Contract with the Federal Government, dated March 21, 1967, as amended for a total project capital grant substantially in the amount of $21,087,827 (an increase of $5,863,143), and a total Project Temporary Loan through direct or private financing under the existing Loan and Grant Contract of $33,705,767 (an increase of $5,863,143) for undertaking and financing the Project is hereby approved, and the Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to file such an Amendatory Application with the Department of Housing and Urban Development to provide such additional information and to furnish such documents as may be required on behalf of the Agency, and to act as the authorized correspondent of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. ., fi . ~ ...J Adopted: 3-6-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 978. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE IN NAME OF REDEVELOPER, REUSE PARCEL 89, CALIF. R-10: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 979 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING A CHANGE OF NAME FOR THE PURCHASERS OF REUSE 89, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-10 ~ --' 1092 [ WHEREAS, on the 16th day of January, 1969, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino adopted Resolution No. 921 authorizing the sale of Reuse Parcel 89, Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10 to POC, Inc. WHEREAS, POC, Inc. now desires to take title to said Reuse Parcel in the name of Inland Warehouse Company, a partnership. WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting held March 6, 1969, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by Inland Warehouse Company are in order and in conformance with the rules and regulations as established by the Department of Housing,and Urban Development for the disposition of project lands. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Agency does hereby determine that Inland Warehouse Company possesses the qualifieations and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the change of name of the Redeveloper from POC, Inc. to Inland Warehouse Company, a partnership is authorized, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in Resolution 921 adopted January 16, 1969 by said Agency, and the Vice Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized to execute necessary amendments to said contract to effect said change of name. r i \ l} ..... Adopted: 3/6/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 979. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin to adjourn the meeting at 5:55 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None [ 1093 D n~ D Si U f7 rr (1) ?) [1 T~ ~\J r:-l~ i.l. ('.' T~.11] tfi. W l' ~ i:1,'.j il, ;:. "'j , I!:'; r: 1,\ i;11 1',\ r, ~. t:"1 li:l 'u' l: I ;J ~w ~ :-,i .:.....i L' ~;..L4..J ~ L.w. J.l.J. 1~ lL J.~ ~i ~ V.ll. ~,::2Q . ~~F(,~I-':':<..r~'0. _ L~"'.' .., ~ '_\ :",,>h,..,i . ~~: ilfJjJ Of l~f Cll~ Of SRn BfRnRRDlnO, CRLlfORniR~ MEMSERS \\lAR:-~E:R VI. HO:>GDON. CHA:RMAN RAY M. VllLSO~. VICE-CHAIRMAN AL. M. AUSTIN E. GEORGE W=:8STER SANFORD H. WEIN 323 Ccu~j' STREi::T -'" SAN SERNARDINO, CAL.Il'ORNIA llE401 PHONE TURNER 3-1:;11 P. O. SOX 1557 . PETER W. QUINN, JR. ExeCUTIvE DIHCCiO~ S~CRET^RY.~R~^SURER February 18, i 969 The Honorable Mayor and Common Council City Hall San Bernardino, California Gentlemen: As you know, on December 16, 1968, because of the personal financial drain, I acknowledged my interl'cion to step down as Chairman and c Board Member of the Redevelopment Agency after serving two years in this capacity. At this time, Mayor Boilard requested that I remain for an additional thirty days, during which time his appointed Committee could submit to him, by January i5, !969, an indiv- idual to fill my forthcom: ng vacancy. ...., I ......J Mr. Verne Potter, Chairman of the Mayor's Committee, informed me on February i7, 1969, that Mr. Terrill Spoor had been recommended and would accept appointment to the Agency Soard. I have met and spent many hours' with Mr. Spoor, giving what knowledge 1 might have pertaining to our Renewal Projects, and I consider him a qualified and dedicated choice. Mr. Spoor will now have the distinct opportunity and privilege, as I have nad, to associate with my fellow Boed tv\embers, HUD representatives, Asency Staff and others, all of who:n I will be accessible to at any time in the future if the occassion should arise. Therefore, please accept my resignation from the responsibilities I have loved so deeply, for my personal f.inances precl ude participation in the Fruition that is so near. Respectfully yours, C/~y/>>t/ 6'~L;:i~~ dt;x;// WARNER W. HODGDON"~ ;;r f/./J ~ -r-:- /J u / yr. /. 0 c r' Member or cv-r~,/;M ~!;ez:". ;;z f : 1/,7 0., ~, ~\-<)I,pa:"cl:,,% I u.. '21/ .. () 0 If/~ ! I c.~ % $c:t;.,r - c::vc P ( '; L:.iu ~ / .,., ="" ~. ~.p ~Yj-J^,,.<\,.~ 0 4",1'..'\. "'" ....J 1094 ,..... ~ l.. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA The Vice Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Wilson, Webster and Austin Agency Members Absent: Wein Also Present: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; and Mrs. Register, Secretary. MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 6, 1969 were present~d to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 6, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and-Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein "..... REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he had nothing to report at this time. ..... ELECTION OF OFFICERS. Motion was made by Webster that the election of officers be held in abeyance until the next regularly scheduled meeting on April 3, 1969 in order to give the Mayor additional time in selecting a new member for the Agency Board of Directors to fill Mr. Hodgdon's unexpired term. Motion was seconded by Austin. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein DAMAGE CLAIMS, KATHERINE BRAZIL: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin that this matter be referred to our Agency Counsel for review and report back at the next regularly scheduled Board Meeting on April 3, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vete, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO APPOINT ADDITIONAL SIGNER FOR AGENCY CHECKS AND VOUCHERS. The following resolution was introduced: r L- ~- . 1095 ~ RESOLUTION NO. 980 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING MR. AL M. AUSTIN, AS SIGNER FOR AGENCY CHECKS AND VOUCHERS -..I WHEREAS, Section 4 of Article II of the Bylaws of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorizes the Treasurer to sign all others and checks for the payment of money; and WHEREAS, said Agency by Resolution No. 308, adopted February 6, 1964, Amen'ed said Bylaws so as to permit the Treasurer to countersign checks and one of two other designated persons to sign all such orders and checks; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to designate two sigpers for Agency checks: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Mr. A1 M. Austin be designated as signer for checks and orders for the payment of money of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately. This Resolution rescinds Resolution No. 481. Adopted: 3/20/69 ~ Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 980. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster Noes: None Abstention: Austin Absent: Wein (Because of Austin being the one appointed to sign agency checks and vouchers, he was not able to vote, therefore, the meeting was turned over to him to carry out the duties of the Vice Chairman while this resolution was being vote~ upon.) --- CONDEMNATION ACTION, LOUIS D. & PAULINE C. CAVALLETTO, BLOCK 22, PARCEL 3, CALIF. R-79. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 981 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (BLOCK 22, mRCEL 3, LOUIS D. & PAULINE C. CAVALLETTO) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the ~ -- '.. _.....~. ._,,, ,...., _~"...... _~___,_"__,~__,>,,,_>c'~""-l'9:"\m;[~i'ii~.~~~~_ ..4!\4,,__ _~~'_' ..- .... .-. [ [ [ 1096 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of exist- ing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is desig- nated as Block 22 Parcel 3 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 3/20/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 981. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein AUTHORIZATION TO SEND ONE OR MORE STAFF MEMBERS TO A SEMINAR ON rHE 1968 HOUSING ACT, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 982 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ONE OR MORE STAFF MEM- BERS TO TRAVEL TO STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, TO ATTEND A SEMINAR ON THE 1968 HOUSING ACT, MARCH 24-25, 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found essential that one or more Staff Members travel to Stockton, California to attend a seminar on the 1968 Housing Act to be held March 24~25, 1969. ."". ""~~~~?"l'i';~~., . _ __ ~ p, __ _..,._~.~~.1l-._:!'iiJl\I':rlll!L~___.. 1097 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that certain Staff Members are hereby authorized to travel to Stockton, California, to attend a seminar on the 1968 Housing Act March 24-25, 1969, and their expenses are hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. 302 of the Agency. ~ -.J Adopted: 3/20/69 Motion was .ade by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 982. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: AYes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein CHANGE ORDER NO.4, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, FONTANA PAVING, R-79: Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster to table this matter until the next regularly scheduled Agency Board Meeting on April 3, 1969 ~ give Mr. Quinn a chance to talk with Jess Ross of the City Electrical Department. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, ROBERT R. & MARILYN BUSTER; ROBERT D. & CLARISSA J. CLOUD; MORRISON AND HILL; GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY, REUSE PARCEL 42. The following resolution was introduced: ..-.- RESOLUTION NO. 983 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO ROBERT R. BUSTER AND MARILYN BUSTER; ROBERT D. CLOUD AND CLARISSA J. CLOUD; MORRISON AND HILL; GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS AND TROY ......J WHEREAS, Robert R. Buster and Marilyn Buster; Robert D. Cloud and Clarissa J. Cloud; Morrison and Hill; Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy, hereinafter called the Redevelopers, have entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernaddino; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated October 16, 1967, was recorded on October 24, 1967, in Book 6912 on page 73 and said Grant Deed, dated October 24, 1967, was recorded on October 24, 1967, in Book 6912 on page 98, both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of Calif- ornia; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redevelopers covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain i.provements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Deed to furnish the Redevelopers with an instrument certifying completion ....... - 1098 "... of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeve10perts completion thereof; and WHEREAS, said real property is described as: The Northerly 176 feet of Lot 7, Block 3, excepting therefrom the West 15 feet and the Northerly 176 feet of Lot 8, Block 3 excepting therefrom the East 144 feet of the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 1, records of said County. NOTE: Said land is also shown on Record of Surveys, Book 24, pages 51 to 54, inclusive, records of said County. ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED in accordance with Section 4 of said Agreement and Section 4 of said Grant Deed, that the Agency does hereby conclusively certify and give notice that the Redevelopers have fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agree- ments with respect to the obligation of Redevelopers for the construction of improvements and ~ates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinafter described real property. r- IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, bhat the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded With the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a IICertificate of Compliancell. ..... Adopted: 3/20/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 983. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND $1,100.00 FOR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES IN NAHRO. The Vice Chairman requested authorization to pay the NAHRO Membership dues for the year ending April, 1970. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the payment of NAHRO Membership Dues for the year ending April, 1970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein RESOLUTION COMMENDING WARNER W. HODGDON AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENC~: r ! ..... Mr. Wilson requested that a committee be formed to draw up an apprppriate resolution commending Warner W. Hodgdon for his services. He nominated Mr. Webster as Chairman and Mr. Austin, Mr. Quinn and Mr. Varner to the committee. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin that a committee be formed to prepare an appropriate resolution for Warner W. Hodgdon. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ~s: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein 1099 EXPENDITURES: ..... The Expenditures for the month of February, 1969, were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin approving the Expenditures as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein ..... ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin to adjourn the meeting at 4:50 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein. ~ - ~ - 1100 '-- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ,..,.. The Vice Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; and Mrs. Register, Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 20, 1969, were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 20, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: r Mr. Varner stated that he had nothing to report at this time. Mr. Webster brought up the question about the damage claims against the Agency by Katherine Brazil. Counsel stated that Mr. Press had been in touch with claimant and the repairs had been made. Mr. Varner stated that claimant was to be queried as to whether they were going to withdraw claims against the Agency. Mr. Webster requested that Counsel report further on the matter at the next meeting. .... RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTIONS: ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin that the election of officers be held in abeyance until the next regularly scheduled meeting in order to give the Mayor and Common Council more time to select a new member for the Agency Board to fill Mr. Hodgdon's unexpired term. Vice ChairmaR, Ray M. Wilson and the remaining Members of the Board directed Mr. Quinn to write a letter to the Mayor and Common Council requesting the early appointment of such a replacement member in order that the Agency might hold an election of officers at its next regular meeting. In the event a replacement member has not been appointed by that time, the Agency Board indicated its intention to hold its election of officers at that meeting notwithstanding the absence of such appointment by the Mayor and Common Council, [ PUBLIC HEARING - R-10 LAND DISPOSITION: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin opening the Public Hearing 1101 on all R-10 Disposition Parcels. There being no objection to disposal of properties to redevelopers as advertised in the Free Press on March 19 and April 2, 1969, the Public Hearing was closed and motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing disposal of properties, and amendment of all disposition contracts to indicate the correct dates of the public hearings. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ - EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION ON SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, R-10, BLOCK 8, PARCEL 6 AND BLOCK 3, PARCELS 8, 9 and 13: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 984 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-10 (Block 8, Parcel 6 and Block 3, Parcels 8, 9 and 13) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as fo1Jows: To . develop the area known as Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on July 21, 1958 by Ordinance No. 2233, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street ar.eas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, str~et installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of Ca1 ifornia, in and for the County(;of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-10, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 8, Parcel 6 and Block 3, Parcels 8, 9 and 13 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American ~ Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. -, ~ ...., Adopted: 4/3/69 - 1102 [ Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 984. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DISPOSAL OF R-79 PROPERTY BY FIXED PRICE COMPETITION METHOD AND ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF REDEVELOPERS. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin to table this matter until the next regularly scheduled Agenc,-Board Meeting to give this item more study. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ESTABLISHING MINIMUM PRICE FOR R-79 LAND: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin to table this matter until the next regularly scheduled Agency Board Meeting to give this item more study. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLICATION OF INVITATION FOR PROPSALS FOR LAND IN CENTRAL CITY PROJECT: ",,- I Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin to table this matter until the next regularly scheduled Agency Board Meeting to give this item more study. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ...... ADVERTISEMENTS IN NATIONAL MEDIA RE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NOT TO EXCEED $10,000: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin to table this matter until the next regularly scheduled Agency Board Meeting to give this item more study. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF ESCROW TIME TO MAY 7, 1969, REUSE PARCELS 76, 77 AND PORTION OF 78, HANFORD FOUNDRY COMPANY: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 986 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENTION OF EXCROW FOR REUSE PARCELS 76, 77 AND PORTION OF 78, R-10, UNTIL MAY 7, 1969 r- ; WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 947, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcels 76, 77 and Portion of 78, Calif. R-10, to Hanford Foundry Company; and '- 1 .::"-........."'._1",.,:; 1103 WHEREAS, escrow was opened for 60 days, the 7th day of February, 1969; and WHEREAS, a request has been submitted for an extension of escrow until May 7, 1969 in order for the purchaser to make final financial arrangements for purchase; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that such a request is proper. ..... ...J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the extension of escrow on Reuse Parcels 76, 77 and Portion of 78, R-10, is hereby approved until May 7, 1969. Adopted: 4/3/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 985. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: Wilson Abstention: Nbne Absent: None CONDEMNATION WITNESS, PAT McDERMOTT, R-79, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 23, MASONIC BUILDING: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 986 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ENTERING INTO OF A CONTRACT WITH PAT McDERMOTT, FOR WITNESS SERVICES INVOLVED IN THE CONDEMNATION ACTION OF BLOCK 4, PARCEL 23 (MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION) ..... " ....... WHEREAS, it has been resolved by Resolution No. 774 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Real Property hereinafter described as Block 4, Parcel 23, is necessary for the public uses and purposes of said Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, Eminent Domain proceedings has been instituted regarding said property; and WHEREAS, Pat McDermott is qualified as an expert witness in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the eounty of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Agency desires to utilize the services of said Pat McDermott as an expert witness in the above mentioned Eminent Domain proceeding. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Executive Director, p. W. Quinn, Jr., and the Vice Chairman of said Agency, Ray M. Wilson, be authorized to enter into a contract with said Pat McDermott providing for his services as an expert witness in con- nection with said Eminent Domain proceeding. ..... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that compensation to be paid to said Pat McDermott, will not exceed $150.00 per day or $75.00 per half day. Adopted: 4/3/69 ....... 1104 r- L Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 986. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.4, FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO.4, CALIF R-79 : Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster to table this matter until the next regularly scheduled Agency Board Meeting in order to determine the area of responsibility of both the Agency and the City. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Wein was excused from the meeting at 4:55 p.m. AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT TO OBTAIN APPROPRIATE CREDIT REPORTS AS ACCEPTABLE BY H.U.D. REGULATION: The following resolution was introduced: ",.- RESOLUTION NO. 987 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT TO OB~AIN APPROPRIATE CREDIT REPORTS AS ACCEPTABLE BY H.U.D. REGULATION '-- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California is actively marketing land in the Central City, Calif. R-79 Project Area; and WHEREAS, Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 4, requires the Agency to determine that the proposed redeveloper possesses the quali- fication and financial resources to acquire and develop the land in accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan and the proposed Disposition Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency wishes to utilize all means possible to assure itself that no ineligible redevelopers are involved in a disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Vice Chairman and Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino are authorized to execute a contract with an appropriate credit bureau acceptable to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, for the obtaining of credit reports covering proposed redevelopers. Adopted: 4/3/69 r , '- Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 987. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Wein returned to the meeting at 4:59 p.m. 1105 AUTHORIZATION TO INSTALL A BOARD FENCE ALONG THE DEMOLITION AREAS ON IIEII STREET: ~ The following resolution was introduced: - RESOLUTION NO. 988 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING THE SAN BERNARDINO DOWN- TOWN ASSOCIATION TO UTILIZE BOARD FENCE ALONG IIEII STREET DEMOLITION AREA FOR ART PURPOSES WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Downtown Association has requested that the Redevelop- ment Agency install a board fence along the demolition and construction area of IIEII Street between Third and Fourth Streets in the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Downtown Association would like to sponsor an art contest using the board fence for said purpose; and WHEREAS, the Agency's contractor for Unit 3, Phase II Contract will install a board fence along the area in question. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the San Bernardino Downtown Association be allowed to conduct an art contest on the board fence as mentioned above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the San Bernardino Downtown Association shall be respon- sible for the content for the art posted or drawn on the fence and shall imme- diately remove any items deemed to be offensive by the Redevelopment Agency or the City of San Bernardino. ..... - Adopted: 4/3/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 988j The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.5, FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 989 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 WITH FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARA- TION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving, for Site Preparation Unit No.4 Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and fIIIlIIIIt - 1106 "... I, ..... WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed the 17th day of January, 1969; Change Order No.2 was executed the 7th day of February, 1969; Change Order No.3 was executed the 7th day of March, 1969; and Change Order No.4 was tabled for further consideration; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to Amend said Contract to increase the services as set forth in Change Order No.5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.5 to Contract with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, to increase the services for an amount not to exceed $12,427.65. Adopted: 4/3/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 989. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, and Austin Noes: Wein Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.9, EDMOND J. VADNAIS, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO. lb, CALIF R-l 0: The following resolution was introduced: ,...... -- RESOLUTION NO. 990 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO CONTRACT WITH EDMOND J. VADNAIS, UNIT NO. lB, R-10 "... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Edmond J. Vadnais dated May 22, 1968 for Site Preparation Unit No. lB, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, the Agency entered into Change Order No. 1 the 21st day of June, 1968; Change Order No.2 the 12th day of August, 1968; Change Order No.3 the 18th day of October, 1968; Change Order No.4 the 7th day of November, 1968; Change Order No.5 the 22nd day of November, 1968; Change Order No.6 the 16th day of January, 1969; Change Order No.7 the 7th day of February, 1969; and authorized Change Order No.8 the 6th day of March, 1969 by Resolution No. 977; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to enter into Change Order No. 9 with Edmond J. Vadnais to authorize installation of additional outlets at Reliable Bearing, Cooley Hardware and Western Title; and to increase the upset figure by no more than $900.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.9 with Edmond J. Vadnais, Unit No. lB, ""- 1107 R-10, to authorize installation of additional outlets at Reliable Bearing, Cooley Hardware and Western Title; and to increase the upset figure by no more than $900.00. ...... Adopted: 4/3/69 - Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 990. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 967 TO INCREASE UPSET FIGURE TO APPROXIMATELY $2,500. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 991 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT TO CON- TRACT AMENDMENT NO.1, TO CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES, FOR THE MALL MODEL WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Victor Gruen Associates for the construction of a Mall Model of the Central City Project, dated the 26th day of September, 1968; and .. WHEREAS, the Agency desires to now amend Contract Amendment No. 1 to increase the contract price originally estimated to cost $2,000, for reconstructing portions of the present model, wherein some buildings which now appear as simple wood blocks will be reconstructed to take on the appearance of their actual form and character. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to amend Contract Amendment No. 1, to increase the upset figure not to exceed $2,500 and to execute such Amendment of the Contract with Victor Gruen Associates. Adopted: 4/3/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 991. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin and Wein Noes: Webster Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.3, DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 22, CALIF. R-79 DAKENO, INC.: The following resolution was introduced: ~ - 1108 ,.... L RESOLUTION NO. 992 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO.3, WITH DAKENO INC., DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE UNIT NO. 22, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San,'Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Dakeno, Inc., for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 22, Calif. R-79, on the 20th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 was executed on the 20th day of December, 1968 increasing the services of said Contract and Change Order No.2 was executed on the 6th day of February, 1969 for an extension of time due to a party wall liability that exists between 548-554 and 560-566 W. Third Street; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to execute Change Order No.3 with Dakeno, Inc. to remove concrete island, sidewalks, and intersection at Third and "H" Streets. "...... 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.3 with Dakeno, Inc., for Unit No. 22, R-79, to remove concrete island, sidewalks, and intersection at Third and "H" Streets. The cost of said additional work not to exceed the amount of $500.00. ...... Adopted: 4/3/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 992. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE IN DATE OF REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1969: Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein that the Regular Scheduled Board Meeting of April 17, 1969 be scheduled for April 18, 1969 due to Mr. Wilson being out of town on April 17, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH WOOD AND ASSOCIATES FOR WEED ABATEMENT, R-10: The following resolution was introduced: ",.. ,~ RESOLUTION NO. 993 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AUTHORIZING THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH WOOD AND ASSOCIATES FOR WEED ABATEMENT, R-10 i~ ..... 1109 ~ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino is responsible for controlling the growth of weeds upon properties owned by said Agency within the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Agency to have Weed Control performed by a Contractor; and - WHEREAS, Wood and Associates has satisfactorily performed this contract in the past; and WHEREAS, Wood and Associates' work has encompassed all items set forth as requirements of this Agency; and WHEREAS, the price is not a major deviation from the Agency's estimate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Vice Chairman and Secretary are hereby directed to execute a contract for Weed abatement, R-10, by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, and Wood and Associates, not to exceed the amount of $1,012.00. Adopted: 4/3/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 993. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ..., RESOLUTION COMMENDING WARNER W. HODGDON AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: ~ 'j -...i The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 994 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING MR. WARNER W. HODGDON WHEREAS, Mr. Warner W. Hodgdon was appointed as a Member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by the Honorable Al C. Ballard, Mayor of the City of San Bernardino, on March 6, 1967, and elected to the position of Chairman by his fellow members on April 6, 1967, which position he continuously and commendably filled to the date of his resignation as a member, and as Chairman, of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino; and WHEREAS, Mr. Warner W. Hodgdon, has in fulfillment of his responsibilities as Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, unselfishly contributed substantial amounts of his pe~sonal time, efforts, and resources, ___ to the aims, goals, and achievements of the Redevelopment Agency; and - 1110 ".... i, I; ~ WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency and the staff of said Agency desire to express their appreciation and gratitude to Mr. Warner W. Hodgdon for his tireless efforts and devotion to duTy as Chairman of said Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that it express to Mr. Warner W. Hodgdon, and it hereby does so express, its appreciation and gratitude for his outstanding ability, devotion to duty, and leadership as Chairman of said Agency. Adopted: 4/3/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 994. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Rein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Agency Board Members decided that this resolution would be set up in parchment and would be properly presented to Mr. Hodgdon. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE AND INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE ALONG NORTH SIDE OF PARKING LOT, CALIF. R-79: ,,- RESOLUTION NO. 995 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH ALBRITE FENCE COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CHAIN LINK FENCE, CALIF, R-79 L r L. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has, under date of March 21,1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pur- suant to that Contract, the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage a Contractor for the installation of chain link fence in the Central City Project;and WHEREAS, bids were received for said services, and the Agency haviQg reviewed the bids found and determined that the bid of Albrite Fence Company appears to be in the best interest of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOlVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the bid of A1brite Fence Company is here- by accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are authorized to enter into a contract for said installation of chain link fence, not to exceed the sum of $788.00. Adopted: 4/3/69 ~ ~" 1111 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster that this matter be referred to Legal Counsel and Executive Director to ascertain if award to Albrite was legal and if an award to Albrite was not legal and in accordance with labor regulations, then award to next low bidder if he was a legally conform- ing contractor. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Webster, and Wein Noes: Wilson Abstention: Austin Absent: None ~ j , i .......; Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin that the Agency Counsel give a report on the study and recommendation for review procedures on finder's fees. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Webster stated that the Board Members used to receive a statement at each meeting as to fiscal condition of Agency, monies from allocation bonds, what monies Agency had and where they were. He stated that he would like to again receive a fiscal progress report. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein to adjourn the meeting at 5:45 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstestion: None Absent: None -, .J ~ ........ 1112 ~ i' n ~ ~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 18TH DAY OF APRIL 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALI FORNIA The Vice Chairman called the Meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Webster, Wilson, Austin and Wein Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, Mr. Quinn, Executive Director, and Mrs. Contr~ras, Secretary MINUTES: ",.-. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 3, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Austin brought it to the Members attention that Resolution No. 991, last paragraph should read lIupset figure not to exceed $2,50011. This being the only correction, motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 3, 1969, as revised. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None II.... EXPEND ITURES: The expenditures for the month of March, 1969, were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Wein requested that Mr. Quinn submit to the Board Members a breakdown of IIRobert Hill - appraisal services - in the amount of $2,10011. Mr. Wilson requested that the expenditure pages be numbered. These being the only items in question, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the expenditures for the month of March, 1969, with the exception of the Robert Hill item. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Quinn was asked to submit a report on the finding of quarters for the Site Office needs. This report will be submitted at the next Regular Meeting. REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner reported on the following: Katherine Brazil: Mr. Varner contacted Mr. Bedford, counsel for Mrs. Brazil, and advised him that the contractor had taken care of the problem involved, and the claim should be withdrawn. The claim will not have to be acted upon by the Members at this time. r- L .~."" -':rr-~~-~ '.:if--:'~~~:+'~;;";"':~""~;-':"';/~"":; ~':_-:;:';;~~:"'"i!""'" 1113 Masonic Lodge: This case has not been resolved. Trial date for condemnation will be June 16, 1969. Mr. Varner and Mr. Quinn will meet with Mr. Bierschbach prior to trial and try to negotiate settlement of the case. IlIIIl!Il ...... Western Union: A report will be given to the Members at the next Regular Meeting. In reference to Mr. Wilson1s query of progress on schedule for acquisition of property, Mr. Varner stated that Agency was ahead of schedule for acquisition of property. Mr. Wein proposed a motion before the Board, that a policy for Finder's Fee be established that the Executive Director would not pay any Finder's Fee until it has been examined and approved by the Board, and that documentation referring to Finder's Fee will state the approval of the Agency1s Board. Motion was seconded by Webster and carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ELECTION OF OFFICERS: As indicated at the last regular meeting of the Agency, it was strongly recom- mended that the vacancy of the Chairman be filled at this time. Mr. Wein nominated Mr. Al M. Austin for Chairman. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster electing Mr. Al M. Austin as Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, to fill the unexpired term of Warner W. Hodgdon, re- signed. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein and Wilson Noes: None ,... ! .. Mr. Austin abstained from voting; however, at the request of the Board Members, he voted. The motion was carried unanimously. The meeting was turned over by the Vice Chairman to Mr. Al M. Austin, Chairman. Mr. Austin addressed the Board as the new Chairman. He extended his appreciation and gratitude to the Members on his selection as Chairman and stated that with their help he would try his best to meet his responsibilities and to push the Agency towards its goals with great speed. ....J METHOD OF DISPOSAL FOR R-79 PROPERTY: Mr. Quinn informed the Members that HUD required the setting up of a method for disposition of property. There are five methods, but of these five, the first two were recommended for use by the Agency for disposition of R-79 property. Mr. Wein expressed his opinion that the area West of the Mall Complex should not be chopped up, and that a criteria for disposition of R-79 property should be established. He also asked if a study had been made as to the business use of this area. Mr. Wilson suggested that Method # 1 Fixed-Price Competition, should be used for the West end of area, and a cut-off of 30 days be set up. Mr. Wein debated the cut off time. He felt that an arbitrary cut-off date might result in the elimination of prospective developers based on an inability to meet an arbitrary time criteria. Mr. Varner stated that Fixed-Price Competition Method did not seem to indicate that a specific cut-off date had to be used. After much discussion, it was decided that the Fixed-Price Competition Method with no cut-off date would be exercised if legal, and if not a 30 day cut-off period with the right to extend such cut-off date for a period not to exceed one year. ~ .... 1114 r (\ '- Legal advertising was approved for Project Calif. R-79, excluding that portion South of Court, North of Second, East of "E" and West of "0" Streets. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 996 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR DISPOSAL OF LAND IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-79, UTILIZING THE fIXED PRICE COMPETITION METHOD, AND ESTABLISHING THE CRI- TERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF REDEVELOPERS UNDER SAID METHOD WHEREAS, the United States Government, Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment, Urban Renewal Handbook, RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 1, provides for a disposal method of offering by public notices and advertisements of the availability of land in a redevelopment project area; and WHEREAS, RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2 of said Urban Renewal Handbook rew quires the establishment of the criteria for selection of Redevelopers; namely, design of proposed development, qualifications and experience of the Redeveloper and his associates, and anticipated tax revenues; and r WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino to dispose of all land in Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79 as expeditiously as possible to qualified redevelopers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, dispose of the land described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto, in the Central City Project Area, No.1 Calif. R-79, through the Fixed Price Competition Method, to qualified redevelopers, the selection of which will be based on a combination of the following criteria; a) Design of proposed development; b) Qualification and experience of the Redeveloper and his associates; c) Anticipated tax revenues, as provided for in said Urban Renewal Handbook. '"'- BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that said Fixed Price Competition Method for the dis- posal of such land shall be in accordance with the provisions of said Urban Renewal Handbook governing said Fixed Price Competition Method. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster adopting Resolution NO. 996. Motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None r L. 1115 EXHI BIT IIA 11 tIIIIII\ CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO. 1 CALIF. R-79 REUSE PARCELS PARCEL 2b 4 5 6 7 8 9 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 45 46 47 48 49 50 52 53 ....J , ~ ..." ESTABLISHING MINIMUM PRICE FOR R-79 LAND: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 997 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE MINIMUM DISPOSI- TION PRICE FOR LAND IN CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1 CALIF. R-79 AND ESTABLISHING THAT SAID PRICES ARE NOT LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79; and ..., ...... 1116 [ WHEREAS~ the Agency desires to comply with the provisions of the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1~ Chapter 4, Section 1; and WHEREAS~ the Agency desires to establish disposal prices for certain Reuse Parcels as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and as hereinafter set forth: PARCEL PRICE 2b $ 67~100 4 133~000 5 120~ 100 6 181,200 7 178~800 8 126,600 9 135,700 25 217,600 26 119,200 27 126,300 28 123,100 29 162,000 30 114,500 31 140,900 32 197,300 ",.... 33 170,800 34 267,900 .... 35 175,900 45 294,000 46 340,300 47 349,500 48 327,500 49 124,300 50 207,400 52 34,400 53 31,700 WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that these respective disposal prices are not less than the fair value of the respective parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that disposal prices herein set forth are approved and that the prices as approved are not less than the fair market value for the respective parcels. Adopted: 4/18/69 ,... f, ... Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 997. Motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1117 PUBLICATION OF INVITATION FOR PROPOSALS FOR L~ND IN CENTRAL CITY PROJECT: .~ The following resolution was introduced: - RESOLUTION NO. 998 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION FOR INVI- TATIONS FOR PROPOSALS ON LAND IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1 CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 996, approved the method ~f disposing of cert~in parce1s.of . land in the Central City Project No.1, Ca11f. R-79, and determlned the crlterla for the selection of Redevelopers for said land; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 997, approved the respective prices of each parcel of said land and determined that said cost of said prices was not less than the fair market value therefore; and WHEREAS, RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2 requires that the Agency make public the notice of the offering of land in an Urban Renewal Area by publishing a notice in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the locality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino hereby approve the offering of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79, and hereby authorize the publication of the notice of the offering of said land in said Project Area as required by said Urban Renewal Handbook; said land is known by Agency Reuse Parcels 2b, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 52 and 53. 1-' , I i 1 --- BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Agency hereby establishes a cut-off date of 30 days from the first date of publication of said notice for the receipt of pro- posals, provided that the Agency, in its discretion, may extend the cut-off da te . Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 998. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Wein made a motion and seconded by Mr. Wilson that the Execut,ve Director and the Agency Counsel submit a letter to the Mayor and Common Council before the next City Council Meeting, requesting that the Mayor and Common Council consider the adoption of the Cultural Center in that area so proposed by the Agency so that their decision may be available to the Board Members by the next Regular Meet- ing of the Agency, May 1, 1969. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None r. Absent: None . L- 1118 [ ADVERTISEMENTS IN NATIONAL MEDIA RE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT: Mr. Wein suggested that this advertisement include all of Project Calif. R-79. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 999 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENTS IN NATIONALLY CIRCULATION MEDIA ON THE AWAIL- ABILITY OF LAND FOR REDEVELOPMENT IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California will have land available for redevelopment in its Central City Project, Calif. R-79 within a reasonable amount of time; and WHEREAS, the Agency has recently received many inquiries from developers re- garding the availability of land in the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to expose said property to as many developers as possible utilizing nationally circulated media such as the Wall Street Journal, the National Real Estate Investor and other national publica- tions. ,.- - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that an amount not to exceed $10,000 be ex- pended for advertisements of the availability of property for redevelopment in the Central City Project in nationally circulated media as determined by the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency to be in the best interest of said Agency. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 999. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.4, FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Austin requested authorization to execute Change Order No. 4 with Fontana Paving Calif. R-79. The changes were explained to the Members. After review, the following resolution was introduced: "... RESOLUTION NO. 1000 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.4, WITH FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARA- TION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 ""-' 1119 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving, for Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 was executed the 17th day of January, 1969; Change Order No.2 was executed the 7th day of February, 1969 and Change Order No. 3 was executed on the 14th day of March, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the con- tractor for installation of pull boxes for the street electrical system for an amount not to exceed $3,072.50. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.4 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No. 4, R-79, increasing the contractor's services for an amount not to exceed $3,072.50. Adopted: 4/18/69 ~ -- Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1000. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ., AMENDATORY ON INCLUSION OF PARKING STRUCTURE, R-79: -- The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1001 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN AMENDATORY APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT FOR PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, avail itself of the financial assistance provided by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, to carry out the urban renewal project described as Central City No.1, Calif. R-79 and bounded generally by 4th Street on the North, 2nd Street on the South, Freeway (U.S. 395) on the West, and Arrowhead Avenue on the East hereinafter referred to as the "Project": and WHEREAS, it is recognized that the Federal Contract for such financial assistance pursuant to said Title I will impose certain obligations and responsibilities upon the Local Public Agency and will require among other things (1) the pro- vision of local grants-in-aid; (2) a feasible method for the relocation of families displaced from the project area; and (3) Other local obligations and responsibilities in connection with the undertaking and carrying out of ~ urban renewal projects; and - 1120 "..- L WHEREAS, Title VI of the'Civi1 Rights Act of 1964, and the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating that Title, provide that no person shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects assisted under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and WHEREAS, the objectives of the Urban Renewal Plan cannot be achieved through rehabilitation of the Project Area: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE AGENCY MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA "..... 1. That the United States of America and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California with regu- lations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 2. That an Amendatory Application on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an Amendatory to the existing Loan and Grant Contract with the Federal Government, dated March 21,1967, as amended, for a total project capital grant substantially in the amount of $19,099,042 (an increase of -0-), and a total Project Temporary Loan through direct or private financing under the existing Loan and Grant Contract of $31,716,982 (an increase of -0-), and to increase the Gross Project Cost from $35,437,623 to $37,428,623 (an increase in Item 2 costs substantially in the amount of $1,991,000) for undertaking and financing a three (3) level parking structure in the Project is hereby approved, and the Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to file such an Amendatory Application with the Department of Housing and Urban Development to provide such additional information and to furnish such documents as may be required on behalf of the Agency, and to act as authorized correspondent of the Rede- velopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. -..... Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1001. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wilson and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADVERTISING FOR CONSTRUCTION PUBLIC PORTION OF MALL: The following resolution was introduced: r , , ....... RESOLUTION NO. 1002 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SECRETARY TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLIC MALL 1121 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, is desirous to accelerate the completion of the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, the Agency has entered into Unit No.3, Phase II Contract with Griggs-Norwood, Inc., for the grading of the public mall and the remaining parki ng area, ~ ......; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Secretary be instructed to advertise for bids for the construction of the public mall. The opening of bids and the actual commencement of work to coincide with the conclusion of Unit 3, Phase II Contract. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1002. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and ~i1son Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXECUTION OF FOURTH AMENDATORY CONTRACT AMENDING LOAN AND GRANT CONTRACT NO. CALIF. R-10(LG): The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1003 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION OF A FOURTH AMENDATORY CONTRACT AMENDING LOAN AND GRANT CONTRACT NO. CALIF. R-10(LG), BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ., :~ -- BE IT RESOLVED By the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The pendin9 proposed Fourth Amendatory Contract (herein called the IIAmendatory Contractll), to amend that certain Loan and Grant Contract No. Calif. R-10(LG), dated October 23, 1958 by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, (herein called the "Loca1 Public Agencyll), and the United States of America (herein called the IIGovernmentll), is hereby in all respects approved. SECTION 2. The Chairman is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendatory Contract in two counterparts on behalf of the Local Public Agency, and the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to impress and attest the official seal of the Local Public Agency on each such counterpart and to forward such counterparts to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for execution on behalf of the Government, together with such other documents relative to the approval and execution of such counterparts as may be required by the Government. ..... ........ 1122 ,... t 11 ..... SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted: April 18, 1969 P. W. Quinn, Jr. Secretary Al M. Austin Chairman Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1003. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein,Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN PROJECT TEMPORARY LOAN NOTE CALIF. R-10(LG): The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1004 RESOLUTION FURTHER AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN PROJECT TEMPORARY LOAN NOTES IN CONNECTION WITH URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-10 AND PROVIDING FOR THE SECURITY FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES ""..... ....... WHEREAS, The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, (herein sometimes called the "Local Public Agencyll), is duly authorized and is undertaking and carrying out a certain urban renewal or redevelopment project of the character authorized by law with financial aid by the United States of America (herein sometimes called the "Government"), in the form of a Project Temporary Loan under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1450, et seq.), which may be made by the Government to the Local Public Agency with respect to the project and in accordance with Contract No. Calif. R-10(LG) dated October 23, 1958, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency did on the 24th day of October, 1958, adopt Resolution No. 71 entitled "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF CER- TAIN PROJECT TH1PORARY t.OAN NOTES IN CONNECTION WITH URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-10(LG) and PROVIDING FOR THE SECURITY FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES II (herein called the "Existing Basic Note Resolution") which Existing Basic Note Resolution, as amended among other things, authorizes the Local Public Agency to issue from time to time its Project Temporary Loan Notes in an aggregate amount outstanding at anyone time of not to exceed THREE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED TWELVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($3,812,425), and r-' ~. ..... WHEREAS, the Project Temporary Loan in the amount of THREE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED TWELVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($3,812,425) provided in Contract No. Calif. R-10(LG) effected on the 24th day of October, 1958, by and between the Local Public Agency and the Government was increased SIX HUNDRED FORTY-SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($646,900) by an Offer of the United States of America to amend said Contract No. Calif. R-10(LG), which 1123 Offer to Amend was duly accepted by the Local Public Agency by Resolution No. 264, dated February 7, 1963, making a total Project Temporary Loan in the in the amount of FOUR MILLION FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($4,459,325) which may be made by the Government to the Local Public Agency under said Loan and Grant Contract; and WHEREAS, the Project Temporary Loan in the amount of FOUR MILLION, FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($4,459,325) provided for in Contract No. Calif. R-10(LG) dated October 23, 1958, as amended, by and between the Local Public Agency and the Government was increased an additional FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000) by a Third Amendatory Contract by and between the Local Public Agency and the Government which Third Amendatory Contract was authorized by Resolution No. 379, dated August 5, 1965, making a total Project Temporary Loan in the amount of FOUR MILLION FIVE HUNDRED NINE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($4,509,325), which may be made to the Local Public Agency under said Loan and Grant Contract, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency and the Government are now further amending Contract No. Calif. R-10(LG) to provide for a total loan of not to exceed FOUR MILLION NINE HUNDRED FORTY-NINE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($4,949,365) and it now appears that the Existing Basic Note Resolution should be further amended: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, as follows: Section 1. That the Existing Basic Note Resolution, as heretofore amended, be, and is hereby further amended as follows: By deleting in Section 1 thereof, the amount of FOUR MILLION FIVE HUNDRED AND NINE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($4,509,325) and inserting in lieu thereof, the amount of FOUR MILLION NINE HUNDRED FORTY- NINE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($4,949,365). Section 2. That this resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted: April 18, 1969 A. M. Austin Chairman ATTEST: P. W. Quinn, Jr. Secretary Motion was by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 1004. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None """""" - ... .... """""" - 1124 r L ALLEN GRESHAM CONTRACT FOR CONDEMNATION SERVICES, R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1005 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ALLEN B. GRESHAM FOR CONDEMNATION, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, R-79 "...- WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 493, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino designated Allen B. Gresham as Condemnation Counsel for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Chairman and Secretary executed a written Contract with Allen B. Gresham dated May 4, 1967 for said services, as set forth in said Contract in an amount not to exceed the aggregate sum of Ten Thousand Do11oars ($10,000) and WHEREAS, Contract Amendment No.2 increased said aggregate sum from $10,000 to $20,000; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 810 increased said aggregate sum from $20,000 to $40,000; and ""'- WHEREAS, it is now necessary to increase the total amount of said Contract by $20,000 to provide for legal services for the length of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 3 is amended to read: "3. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. The Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed the amount of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000), which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be pa i d as f 011 ows : (a) Time spent in court -- $200 per day, or $100 for one half day or less. (b) Time spent outside of court and preparation fer trial $35 per hour. r- , '- Payment of all amounts due in every case will be subject to an invoice for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under the Contract in conformance with the Contract and that he is entitled to re- ceive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. 1125 In addition to the compensation provided aboves the Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from Agency's principle place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Agency. The limitations on cost of transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which currently prevail for staff members of the Agency. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the total compensa- tion and reimbursement if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the maximum sum of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,OOO) for all the services required. ...... - Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1005, amending the Contract with Allen B. Gresham by increasing his upset figure of the contract to $60,000. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wilson and Wein Noes: NOne Abstention: None Absent: None REDEVELOPMENT AREA, COLLEGE PARK PROJECT NO.4: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1006 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING A CERTAIN DESCRIBED AREA AS A REDEVELOPMENT AREA ..... .... WHEREAS, there are survey areas within the City of San Bernardino requiring preliminary studies to determine the feasibility of particular redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 9340, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, on August 12, 1968, designated a certain described area as a survey area and found that said area requires study to determine if a redevelop- ment project is feasible; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, in compliance with the above mentioned Resolution No. 9340, of the City of San Bernardino, California, did prepare a preliminary plan report of a certain described area; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to designate a certain described area as a Redevelopment Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the certain described area as generally described on Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, which is hereby referred to and made a part hereof, is recommended as a Redevelopment Area, and for future reference should be referred to as "State College Area, Project No. 4"S of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. ~ - 1126 [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution shall be forwarded to the Mayor and Common Council and the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1006, recommending a certain described area as a Redevelopment Area, College Park, No.4. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING - REUSE 3, R-79, BANK OF AMERICA: Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson opening the Public Hearing on Reuse 3, R-79, Bank of America. There being no objection to disposal of this property to redeveloper as advertised in the Free Press on April 4 and 11, 1969, the Public Hearing was closed and motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing disposal of property. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None INTENTION TO SELL REUSE 72 TO NATHAN ROSE & AUTHORIZATION TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: r- L The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1007 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT NATHAN H. AND DORIS ROSE ARE REDEVELOPERS WHO ARE QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP REUSE PARCEL NO. 72 AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER'S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ,... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcel No. 72 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1 Chapter 4, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the only proposal submitted was that of Nathan H. and Doris Rose, who are qualified to develop the property; and WHEREAS, because of the size and location of the parcel, the best use of the parcel would be to sell it to the adjacenti1andowners, who are Nathan H. and Doris Rose, ...... 1127 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San .., Bernardino declares its intention to sell Reuse Parcel NO. 72 to Nathan H. and Doris Rose, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and ..J Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said Parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the IJRedeve1oper's Statement for Public Disc1osurelJ, and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held the 15th day of May, 1969. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1007. Motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REFUND OF DEPOSIT, REUSE 82, ELECTRIC AIR, R-10: Mr. Quinn read a letter from Electric Air, dated April 18, 1969, requesting the refunding of their deposit in the amount of $1,590. Mr. Kuechler, representative for Electric Air, further justified the contents of this letter by explaining their financial pressures. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: ~ RESOLUTION NO. 1008 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF ESCROW ON REUSE 82, CALIF. R-10 .....J WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 860 adopted November 7, 1968, authorized the Chairman and Secretary to enter into an agreement with Electric Air for the sale of Reuse 82, Meadowbrook Project No.1, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California by Resolution No. 926, adopted January 16, 1969, extended the closing date of escrow for Reuse 82, R-10, to no later than April 1,1969; and WHEREAS, On April 18, 1969, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, was informed by Electric Air that they were unable to finance their proposed project and consequently, would not be able to close escrow. The Agency was further requested by Electric Air to consider refunding their deposit of $1,590. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereby authorizes the cancellation of the escrow on Reuse 82, Calif. R-10 with Electric Air, and directs the Agency to refund Electric Air's deposit of $1,590 less $45.00 for advertising expenses. ...... .... Adopted: 4/18/69 1128 ,.... !: t... Motion was made by Mr. Wein and seconded by Mr. Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1008, refunding the deposit to Electric Air of $1,590.00 less costs incurred by the Agency for advertising. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.6, UNIT NO.4, FONTANA PAVING, INC. R-79: Mr. Austin requested authorization to execute Change Order No. 6 with Fontana Paving. The changes were explained to the Members. After review, the fol- lowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1009 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 WITH FON- TANA PAVING, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 "..... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving for Site Preparation Unit NO.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1, was executed the 17th day of January, 1969; Change Order No.2 was executed the 7th day of February, 1969; Change Order No.3 was executed the 7th day of March, 1969; Change Order No.4 was executed the 18th day of April, 1969; and Change Order No.5, was executed the 4th day of April 1969; and ... WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the con- tractor for the removal and reinstallation of adequate base for traffic signal for the sum not to exceed $400.00; plus two additional days for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.6 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No.4, R-79, increasing the services of the contractor for an amount not to exceed $400.00. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1009, for the reinstallation of adequate base for traffic signal, plus two additional days for said services. Motion was carried by the following, vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.4, UNIT lC, R-10, FONTANA PAVING, INC: ,.. The following resolution was introduced: .... ,....!'W:;,_"~i-<i,;.'.,"".".,."'..-..:.~..",.,;.-;._...."~ 1129 RESOLUTION NO. 1010 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 WITH FONTANA PAVING SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO. lC, Calif. R-10 ~ - WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving for Site Preparation of Unit No. lC, Calif. R-10, dated the 2nd day of January, 1969; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 was executed on the 7th day of February, 1969; Change Order No.2 was executed on the 21st day of February, 1969 and Change Order No.3 was executed on the 7th day of March, 1969; and . - WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Con- tractor to reinstall street lighting electrical system for an amount not to exceed $255.00; and WHEREAS, due to adverse weather conditions, it is recognized by the Agency Board that an additional fifteen (15) calendar days be added to Fontana Paving's Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change order No. 4 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No. lC, Calif. R-10, increasing the contract price not to exceed the amount of $255.00 for additional services, and increasing the time of completion fifteen (15) days, with new completion date of May 1, 1969. ---- -..j Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution NO. 1010, increasing the services of the contractor, and allowing 15 additional days for completion of contract. Motion was carried by the follow- ing vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.3, DEMO & SITE CLEARANCE UNIT NO. 23, DAKENO, INC: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1011 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO.3, TO CONTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC., DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 23, R-79 ~ - 1130 "... ; !' ~ ..... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San ~ernardino, entered into Contract with Dakeno, Inc., for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 23, Calif. R-79, on the 20th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Agency executed Change Order NO.1 the 7th day of February, 1969, and Change Order No.2 was executed on the 21st day of February, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to enter into Change Order No. 3 with Dakeno, Inc., for the inclusion of Block 9, Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 11 (368-390 IIW Street) for the amount not to exceed $2,440.00, and contract ex- tended additional 7 days for completion of demolition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.3 with Dakeno, Inc., Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 23, R-79, not to exceed the amount of $2,440.00, and adding 7 days to contract for said services. Adopted: 4/18/69 r- Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1011, increasing the services of the contractor, and contract extended 7 additional days for completion of demolition. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None '-- CONTRACTS, ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING, R-79 & R-10: The Real Estate Department has, in the past, requested Arrowhead Engineering to provide the Agency with legal descriptions and surveys on properties located in the project areas. This work has been charged against the Engineering Department's Contract with Arrowhead Engineering, causing confusion in allocating expenses to the appropriate budget items. The Real Estate Department has, therefore, requested authority to enter into contract with Arrowhead Engineering for Real Estate Services, Calif R-79 and Calif. R~lO. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1012 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND EXECU- TIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING FOR REAL ESTATE SURVEY SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL CITY RPOJECT, CALIF. R-79 ,... WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, with the United States of America providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1945, as amended by all amendatory acts, including the Housing Act of 1968; and \- 1131 WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with Real Estate Survey Services for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79. ~ - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Chairman and Executive Director are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with Arrowhead Engineering to provide for the Real Estate Survey Services needed for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79. Total compensation under said Contract not to exceed $20,000. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1012. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 1013 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND EXECU- TIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING FOR REAL ESTATE SURVEY SERVICES FOR THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-10 ... WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of October 23, 1958, entered ... into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Meadowbrook Project Area, Calif. R-10, with the United States of America providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1945, as amended by all amendatory acts, including the Housing Act of 1968 as amended; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with Real Estate Survey Services for the Meadowbrook Project Area, Calif. R-10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and EKecutive Director are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with Arrowhead Engineerigg to provide for the Real Estate Survey Services needed for the Meadowbrook Project Area, Calif. R-10. Total compensation under said Contract not to exceed $10,000. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1013. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ ........ 1132 r I ....... CHANGE ORDER NO. 10, UNIT 3, PHASE I, FONTANA PAVING, INC: Unit 3, Phase I Contract has been completed for two months. Due to some storm damages and since the revised plans for that area will require additional modifications, the contractor will not be required to complete certain repairs. Therefore, it was the recommendation of the Agency that the Board Members concur with the deduction of $750 from the contract. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1014 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO. 10, WITH FONTANA PAVING SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO.3, PHASE I, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving dated September 17, 1968 for Site Preparation Unit No.3, Phase I, Calif. R-79; and ~ WHEREAS, the Agency executed Change Order No. 1 the 20th day of September, 1968; Change Order No. 2 the 4th day of October, 1968; Change Order No. 3 the 17th day of October, 1968; Change Order No.4 the 25th day of October, 1968; Change Order No. 5 the 8th day of November, 1968; Change Order No. 6 the 22nd day of November, 1968; Change Order No. 7 the 6th day of December, 1968; Change Order No.8 the 20th day of December, 1968; and Change Order No.9 the 7th day of February, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to finalize the contract and to deduct $750 from the final payment for repairs not made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order NO. 10 with Fontana Paving to finalize the contract and to deduct $750 from the final payment for repairs not made. ",.-. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1014, to deduct $7~Q from the final payment for repairs not made by the Contractor. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE EASEMENT DEED FOR PORTION OF REALIGNED "0" STREET SOUTH OF AT&SF RAILROAD TRACKS TO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO: The following resolution was introduced: ~ RESOLUTION NO. 1015 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DEDICATION OF A PORTION OF "0" STREET TO THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,..... , 1133 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for Meadowbrook Project No.1, as amended, provides for the realignment of "0" Street in the vicinity of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Tracks; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has requested that the Agency execute an easement to the City of San Bernardino for street and highway purposes for the realignment of "0" Street. ...... ....J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute said easement to the City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1015. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AERIAL PHOTO COVERAGE OF R-79 AND R-10: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1016 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AERIAL PHOTO COVERAGE OF R-79 and R-10, NOT TO EXCEED $500 ,.. .... WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, to maintain a pictorial coverage of the current Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, prospective redevelopers require current aerial photos of the Project Areas; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California is authorized to expend no more than $500 for complete aerial photo coverage of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 and the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10. Adopted: 4/18/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1016. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ...... REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, ALLIED PROPERTIES, BLOCK 3, PARCEL 14, CALIF. R-79: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein to table this matter until the next regularly scheduled. Agency Board Meeting. Motion was carried by the ....... 1134 ".... following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: '-- Mr. Wilson proposed a motion before the Board, that arrangements be made for all Board Members, Executive Director, Legal Counsel and the Mayor of the City, to make a trip to Washington, D. C., at the earliest possible date. The purpose of this trip os so that Agency representatives will have a personal interview with HUD Officials and Congressman, in an attempt to expedite matters of great importance to the Agency. It is felt that such a personal appearance would help extremely in moving the project forward. This appearance should also have resolution support from the Central City Committee. The date of the week of May 12, 1969, was proposed. This motion was seconded by Wein. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None """-' Mr. Wein requested an executive session be held right after the adjournment of the regular meeting. Mr. Webster asked on the progress of the resolution commending Mr. Warner W. Hodgdon. Mr. Quinn informed the members that the parchment has been inked and was ready for Members' signature. Mr. Austin then recommended that this resolution be presented to Mr. Warner W. Hodgdon at the ground breaking of the public mall. He felt that commendation of Mr. Hodgdon at that time would be justified. """- ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 6:25 p.m. Motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: NOne Abstention:None Absent: None r- , '-- 1135 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 1969, 323 COURT STREET, ROOM 305, SAN BERNARDINU, CALIFORNIA ~ - The Chairman reported that this Special Meeting was held pursuant to a duly dated and signed Notice of Special Meeting which was mailed to each and every Member in due time, form and manner as required by law. Said notice is as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Rede- velopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California will be held at the offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 Court Street, Room 305, in the City of San Bernardino, the regular meeting place thereof, at 4:00 p.m., on the 24th day of April, 1968, to award design contract, public courts and malls, for the Central City Project, R-79. DATED this 22nd day of April, 1969. SIP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Executive Director .... -"" 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 22nd day mf April, 1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting on each and every Member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL WITNESS my hand this 22nd day of April, 1969. sIP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Executive Director The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members present: Austin, Webster and Wilson Agency Members Absent: Wein Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Bruce Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Register, Secretary . ..... --- 1136 ,...... ..... AGENCY ACTION: AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD DESIGN CONTRACT, PUBLIC COURTS AND MALLS, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Dan Branigan of the firm Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Associates, Inc., a joint venture gave a brief summary of the scope and work proposed. He stated the contract will include planning, engineering and architecture from explana- tory stages to preparing bid specifications and inspecting the work. He stated that landscaping will be included in the professional services rendered. He pointed out that if landscaping services of another firm was obtained, that the fee would be incurred by Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Associates, Inc., a joint venture. He further stated graphic programs would not be included in their contract. ~-'..... Mr. Branigan stated timing that the joint venture proposed to the Agency would be six months and in three phases. First step - 3 months - Schematic Design Second step - 3 months - Design Development Third step - 6 months - Construction Documents Mr. Branigan stated that compensation for the construction of public areas in the Civic-Cultural Complex would be a lump sum fee of $76,000. He stated this fee would be reduced by $4,000 if their firm has received authority from the City to proceed with design of the Exhibit Hall 90 days prior to the completion date set for the design development. Mr. Quinn stated that 40% of the Central City property Easterly of "E" Street had been acquired to date. Mr. Jerry Armstrong took the floor and stated that the firm of Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Associates, Inc., a joint venture, was a local firm and mentioned some of the j.obs his firm had performed. Mr. Webster gave Mr. Armstrong a good recommen- dation. ~ Mr. Austin is to contact City Administration in reference to their parking for the new City Hall and see if they would like to participate in the cost of a parking structure or just what their intentions are. He is to report back his findings at the Regular Meeting on May 1,1969. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1017 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO AWARD AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES "... i' ...... WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 9777, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, on April 21, 1969, designated sites for the City of San Bernardino City Hall, and Cultural Center; and further designated 1137 ,.... Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Associates, Inc., a joint venture, as architects for the City Hall and Cultural Center; and WHEREAS, the planning sites as selected by the Mayor and Common Council pursuant to said Resolution lie within the Urban Renewal Project Area desig- nated Calif. R-79; and ..... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino desires to avail itself of the professional knowledge of Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Asso- ciates, Inc., a joint venture, and to contract with the above joint venture for professional services regarding design contracts for public courts and malls in connection with the City Hall - Civic-Cultural Center Complex. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Executive Director are hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Asso- ciates, Inc., a joint venture, for the design of public courts and malls in the Civic-Cultural Complex, Project No. Calif. R-79, with total compensation under said contract not to exceed $76,000. Adopted: 4/24/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster adopting Resolution No. 1017. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein ... OTHER BUSINESS: AUTHORIZATION TO EXCAVATE AND IMPORT CLASS 2 BASE MATERIAL ON SECOND STREET. CHANGE ORDER NO.7, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, FONTANA PAVING, CALIF. R-79: ...... The following resolution was'introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1018 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.7, WITH FONTANA PAVING, INC., SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a contract with Fontana Paving, Inc., for Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed the 17th day of January, 1969; Change Order No.2 was executed the 7th day of February, 1969; Change Order No.3 was executed the 7th day of March, 1969; Change order No.4 was executed the 18th day of April, 1969; Change Order No.5 was executed the 4th day of April, 1969; and Change Order No. 6 was executed April 21, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the con- tractor for the excavation of an area on Second Street between F and H Streets, ...... - 1138 "...... , , ~ specifically 1,000 feet long, 9 feet wide and 1 foot in depth, and fill and compact same area with Class 2 Aggregate Base for the sum of $2,750.00 plus four additional days for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.7 with Fontana Paving, Inc., Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, increasing the services of the contractor for an amount not to exceed $2,750.00. Adopted: 4/24/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster adopting Resolution No. 1018. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 4:55 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein ",.- , ...... ,... 11 R ... 1139 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 1ST DAY OF MAY, 1969 IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA .... ....... The Chairman called the Meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Wilson, Austin, Webster and Wein Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director and Mrs. Contreras, Secretary Absent: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 18, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Webster asked if item "Method of Disposal for R-79 Property" should be changed to reflect a cut-off date. Mr. Quinn stated that Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, had investigated HUD regulations for Methods of Disposal of property, and they did indicate that a cut-off date had to be established. Mr. Webster was informed that the Minutes indicated that if the no cut-off date method was not legal, a 30 day cut-off period with the right to extend such cut-off date would be exercised. At Mr. Webster's request, this item was left opened for Mr. Varner's clarification. ... Mr. Wilson stated that on item "E1ection of Officers" the motion did not carry him as an "Ayell. These being the only corrections, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 18, 1969, as revised. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein, and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Minutes of the Special Meeting of April 24, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. There being no corrections, motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson approving the Minutes of the Special Meeting of April 24, 1969. Motion was carried by the following votes, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None -- Due to Mr. Varner's absence, the Report of Agency Counsel was postponed. EXTENSION OF ESCROW, REUSE PARCEL 33, GEORGE & HYMAN SHANE, R-10: Mr. Quinn stated that the letter from the Shanes stated the reason for their request for an extension. Mr. Quinn asked Messrs. Shane if the Texaco Company had approved their plan. Mr. G1assock, Real Estate Manager for the Agency, informed the Members that the District Manager for the Texaco Company had visited Mr. G1assock, to assure the Agency that the District Office had recommended the plan for approval. Mr. Wein asked if this was the Shanes' first request for extension of escrow, whereby he was informed that it was their second. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: ~ - 1140 r I L- RESOLUTION NO. 1019 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF ESCROW FOR REUSE PARCEL 33, R-10, UNTIL JUNE 1, 1969 , WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 883, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel 33, Calif. R-10, to George and Hyman Shane; and WHEREAS, escrow was opened for 60 days, the 12th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, a request has been submitted for an extension of escrow until May 17, 1969 in order for the lessee to approve the preliminary plans; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that such a request is proper; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members feel May 17, 1969 may be too early a date for the developers to expect a reply from the New York based lessee. NOW, TA6REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the extension of escrow on Reuse Parcel 33, R-10, is hereby approved to no later than June 1, 1969. ,... '.... Adopted: 5/1/69 I...- Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of Resolution No. 1019, for extension of escrow for Reuse Parcel 33, R-10, until June 1, 1969. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, arrived at 4:10 p.m. Mr. Varner stated that he had nothing to report at this time. Mr. Varner was asked to clarify the procedure for establishing a cut-off period on the Method for Disposal of R-79 property. He informed the Board Members that 30-day cut-off period had been established and so indicated in the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 18, 1969; therefore, it was not necessary to establish it again. PRELIMINARY DESIGN CIVIC-CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE: "..... ~ l ~ L..., Mr. Dan Branigan appointed spokesman for the Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen, Associates, Inc., a joint Venture, awarded the contract for Preliminary Design of the Civic- Cultural Center Parking Structure, explained a letter that was sent to the Agency from Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Associates, Inc., dated April 30, 1969. This letter contained the proposal for professional services in oonnection with the above mentioned parking structure. The proposal contained a completion date of 45 days from the date the Joint Venture is authorized to proceed with the work. Because it is important to the Agency that this study be completed at the earliest 1141 ~ possible date, Mr. Branigan was asked if he could complete the study within 30 days. Mr. Branigan agreed to the 30 days. The following resolution was introduced: -.lflii RESOLUTION NO. 1020 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO AWARD AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WHEREAS, the City 'of San Bernardino has designated a site for the Civic- Cultural Center Complex; and WHEREAS, the construction of the Civic-Cultural Center and development of surrounding commercial properties will require sufficient offstreet auto- mobile parking; and WHEREAS, Victor Gruen Associates has made a study of the proposed development of the Civic-Cultural Center Complex and recommend that a parking structure would be necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Associates, a joint venture,for the exploratory planning and design of a parking structure in the Civic-Cultural Complex with total compensation under said contract not to exceed $13,500.00 to be completed within 30 days, with a completion date of June 2, 1969. ... :s l~ ...." Adopted: 5/1/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1020, authorizing the execution of contract with Armstrong- Ulmer, Gruen Associates, Inc. a Joint Venture, for professional services. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT WITH LOCAL ADVERTISING FIRM REGARDING NATIONAL MEDIA ADVERTISING, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT: There are three companies that have submitted proposals for advertising. They are: 1) Norman Rogers Advertising; 2) Coordinated Communications; and 3) Pigeon Associates. The proposals for advertising from these three firms were not received by the Agency within sufficient time for thorough review by Agency Personnel. Due to this situation, Mr. Wein made a motion and seconded by Webster that this item be tabled until the next meeting. A Special Meeting will be held on May 8, 1969, to vote on this item, and it was requested that a representative from each firm mentioned be present to explain his proposal. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,...... - 1142 r L, PUBLIC HEARING, REUSE PARCEL 72, NATHAN & DORIS ROSE, CALIF. R-10: The Chairman declared this was the time and place for a Public Hearing on R-10, Reuse Parcel 72, for the disposal of that parcel to Nathan H. and Doris Rose. There being no objection to the disposal of this property to the redeveloper as advertised in the San Bernardino Sun on April 26 and May 1, 1969, the Public Hearing was closed. DISPOSITION OF REUSE PARCEL 72 TO NATHAN & DORIS ROSE, CALIF. R-10: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1021 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF A PORTION OF REUSE PARCEL NO. 72 TO NATHAN H. ROSE ~ND DORIS ROSE, R-10 "..- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California declared its intention to dispose of a portion of Reuse Parcel No. 72 to Nathan H. Rose and Doris Rose by Resolution No. 1007; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and ........ WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held on May 1, 1969 in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap, 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined that it has no objection to sale of said parcel to said Redeveloper; and WHEREAS, the fair market value for the property has been determined to be $8,000.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement for the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 72 to Nathan H. Rose and Doris Rose for the amount stated above, subject to HUD approval. Adopted: 5/1/69 ,...... I L Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1021, authorizing the disposal of Reuse Parcel 72 to Nathan & Doris Rose, Calif. R-10. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin. Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~--~_._..-.~...._-_..._--- 1143 AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE R-79 REUSE PROPERTIES IN CIVIC-CULTURAL CENTER AREA: ~ The following resolution was introduced: - RESOLUTION NO. 1022 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF INVITATIONS FOR PROPOSALS FOR LAND IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 996, approved the method of disposing of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project No.1, Calif, R~79 and determined the criteria for the selection of Redevelopers for said land; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 997, approved the respective prices of each parcel of said land and determined that said cost of said prices was not less than the fair market value therefore; and WHEREAS, RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2, requires that the Agency make public the notice of the offering of land in an Urban Renewal Area by publishing a Notice in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the locality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, hereby approve the offering of certain par- cels of land in the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79, and hereby authorize the publication of the notice of the offering of said land in said Project Area as required by said Urban Renewal Handbook; said land is known by Agency Reuse Parcels 4, 5, 6 and portions of 7,8, 9, 45, 46, 47, 48 and 50. .. .... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Agency hereby establishes a cut-off date of 30 days from the first date of publication of said notice for the receipt of proposals, provided that the Agency, in its discretion, may extend the cut-off date. Adopted: 5/1/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the approval of Resolution No. 1022. Motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACTS WITH FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, SECURITY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY AND WESTERN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR TItLE AND ESCROW CHARGES FOR THE DISPOSITION OF R-79 PROPERTIES: The following resolution was introduced: ..... ....... 1144 r ~, ...... RESOLUTION NO. 1023 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR DISPOSITION TITLE SERVICES AND ESCROW SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No.1, California R-79, with the United States of America, providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by All Amendatory Acts, including the Housing Act of 1968; and ""- WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services for the Cen- tral City Project Area No.1, Calif., R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with First American Title Company, a California Corporation to provide for Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services, needed for the Central City Project Area No.1, California R-79. Total compensation under said Contract not to exceed the sum of $14,850. ,I"H....... Adopted: 5/1/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1023. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1024 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH SECURITY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION FOR DISPOSITION TITLE SERVICES AND ESCROW SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT CALIF. R-79 ..... WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of March 21,1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No.1, California R-79, with the United States of America, providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts, including the Housing Act of 1968; and -- 1145 WHERAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif., R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman end Secretary are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with Security Title Insurance Company, a California corporation to provide for Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services, needed for the Central City Project Area No.1, California R-79. Total Compensation under said Contract not to exceed the sum of $14,850. Adopted: 5/1/69 ~ - Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1024. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin and Webster Noes: None Anstention: None Absent: None The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1025 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION FOR DISPOSITION TITLE SERVICES AND ESCROW SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT CALIF. R-79 .... ..... WHEREAS, the Local PUblic Agency has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No.1, California R-79, with the United States of America, providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts, including the Housing Act of 1968; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with Title Insurance and Trust Company, a California corporation to provide for Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services, needed for the Central City Project Area NO.1, California R-79. Total compensation under said Contract not to exceed the sum of $14,850. Adopted: 5/1/69 ......... ........ 1146 ,... ~ j '-- Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1025. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1026 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH WESTERN TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION FOR DISPOSITION TITLE SERVICES AND ESCROW SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of March 21,1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No.1, California R-79, with the United States of America, providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts, including the Housing Act of 1968; and ".- WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with Western Title Guaranty Company, a California corporation to provtde for Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services, needed for the Central City Project Area No.1, California R-79. Total compensation under said Contract not to exceed the sum of $14,850. ~ Adopted: 5/1/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 1026. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Wein specified that when tRe contractor had no preference to title company, then selection would be made by the Agency on a rotating basis. r L.. AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH NEW POSITION AS OPERATIONS ASSISTANT, WAGE RATE AT RANGE 33, STEP "A", SALARY $565: Mr. Wein explained to the Members that he believed that if a man did work not under his classification, he should be given a title justifiable to such work, as in the case of Mr. Amador Estevene, Engineer's Aid. Mr. Wein made a motion and was seconded by Mr. Webster, establishing this new position of Operations Assistant. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1147 AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE FINANCE OFFICER WAGE RATE FROM RANGE 38 (STARTING SALARY $708) TO RANGE 44 (STARTING SALARY $929): ~ Mr. Wein stated that two candidates for the position of Finance Officer have been interviewed. Mr. Wein also stated that he felt that the starting salary of $708 was not appropriate for a Finance Officer because of the responsibilities that are assumed by such a person. Mr. Wein. therefore, recommended to the Board and made a motion increasing the starting salary to $929. Motion was seconded by Mr. Wilson. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Wein. Wilson, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ....... CHANGE ORDER NO.5. UNIT lC. CALIF. R-10, FONTANA PAVING INC.: The Chairman requested authorization to execute Change Order No. 6 with Fontana Paving. The changes were explained to the Members. After review, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1027 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 WITH FONTANA PAVING. SITE PREPARATION. UNIT NO. 1C, CALIF. R-10 ~ ;, WHEREAS. the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving for Site Preparation of Unit No. lC, Calif. R-10, dated the 2nd day of January. 1969; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed on the 7th day of February, 1969; Change Order No.2 was executed on the 21st day of February. 1969; Change Order No.3 was executed on the 7th day of March, 1969; and Change Order No. 4 was executed on the 18th day of April, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to delete one inch of pavement from the Contract area and install two additional driveways in the work area; and WHEREAS. it is also the desire of the Agency to increase 4 additional days to Fontana Paving1s Contract in order to complete the above work. n ,.." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.5 with Fontana Paving. Site Preparation Unit No. 1C. Calif. R-10, decreasing the contract price in the amount of $950.95, and increasing the completion time 4 additional days, with a new completion date of May 5, 1969. Adopted: 5/1/69 ...... Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1027. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ...... 1148 [ Mr. Wein stated that since the utility companies have been slow in completing certain work required in the Project, it is his recommendation that the Secre- tary be directed to write a letter to the Public Utilities Commission, so that the utility companies can accord the Agency better cooperation. AUTHORIZATION TO PAY 5% COMMISSION, BOB PARKER REALTOR, SALE OF REUSE 89, R-10: Mr. Wein felt that the payment of bonified finder's fee was of great help to the Agency in the disposal of property. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1028 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF A COM- MISSION TO BOB PARKER, REALTOR, FOR THE SALE OF REUSE 89, R-10 "...- WHEREAS, on August 20, 1968, Mr. Bob Parker, Realtor introduced Inland Warehouse Company to the Agency and deposited the Offer to Purchase, a 5% deposit and other related documents; and WHEREAS, the sale of Reuse 89, Meadowbrook Project R-10 to Inland Warehouse Company was approved on January 16, 1969; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 1969 the escrow on said parcel closed;and WHEREAS, the Agency is satisfied the terms and conditions of the Notice to Realtors and Redevelopers has been satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency is authorized to disburse to Bob Parker, Realtor the sum of $1,842.50 representing a 5% Finder's Fee ~---- Reuse 89, Meadowbrook Project California R-10. ~ Adopted: 5/1/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1028. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.8, UNIT NO.1, R-79 SALATA INC: The Chairman requested authorization to execute Change Order No.8 with Salata Inc. The changes were explained to the Members. After review, the following resolution was introduced: IfII""'II "-' 1149 RESOLUTION NO. 1029 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 WITH PETER SALATA CONSTRUCTION INC., UNIT NO.1, CALIF. R-79 ~ - WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Peter Salata Construction Inc., dated May 2, 1968 for Site Preparation Unit No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency has entered into Change Order No. 1 the 26th day of August, 1968; Change Order No.2 the 4th day of October 1968; Change Order No.3 the 17th day of October, 1968; Change Order No.4 the 18th day of October, 1968; Change Order No.5 the 8th day of November, 1968; Change Order No.6 the 20th day of December, 1968; and Change Order No.7 the 20th day of February, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to delete the two sewer laterals to San Bernardino Motor Parts located at the corner of IIFII and Second Streets. Said deletion to be in the amount of $600.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.8 with Salata Construction Co., decreasing the contract price by $600.00. ., II ...JJ Adopted: 5/1/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1029. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.8, UNIT NO.4, FONTANA PAVING, INC. CALIF. R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1030 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 WITH FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving for Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1, was executed the 17th day of January, 1969; Change ~ Order No. 2 was executed the 7th day of February, 1969; Change Order No.3 was executed the 7th day of March, 1969; Change Order No.4 was executed the 18th - 1150 ,... ~ ~ ..... day of April, 1969; Change Order No.5, was executed the 4th day of April, 1969; Change Order No.6 was executed on the 18th day of April, 1969; and Change Order No.7 was executed on the 24th day of April, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Contractor to connect the two sewer laterals to San Bernardino Motor Parts Company on Second Street which were deleted from the Salata Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.8 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No. 4, R-79, increasing the services of the contractor for an amount not to exceed $600.00. Adopted: 5/1/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1030. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, ALLIED PROPERTIES, BLOCK 3, PARCEL 14, CALIF. R-79: ........ Mr. Quinn explained a letter from Allied Properties, informing the Agency that they would not consider entering into an owner participation agreement, and requested that the Agency purchase the property. Mr. Quinn informed the Members that the Agency was not budgeted to purchase this property; therefore, their request cannot be considered. Mr. Varner stated that there were two alternatives to this situation: 1) get the parties to negotiate some acceptable owner participation agreement; and i) the City would cooperate with the Agency under Coope~ation Agreement, and it would enforce the Building Codes, and require that the building be brought up to the code requirements. The following resolu- tion was introduced: "...... RESOLUTION NO. 1031 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, REFUSING THE REQUEST OF ALLIED PROPERTIES TO PURCHASE BLOCK 3, PARCEL 14, ANDRESON BUILD- ING, CALIF. R-79 .... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 was adopted by City Ordinance No. 2649 on February 24, 1965 after the appropriate public hearings as required by the California Health and Safety Code; and WHEREAS, a Loan and Grant Contract was entered into by and between the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino on March 21, 1967; and WHEREAS, said Andreson Building was designated as an Owner Participant; and WHEREAS, as a result of the aforesaid prohibition, no funds were budgeted for the purchase of said Block 3, Parcel 14, Andreson Building; and ..... 1151 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino and the Department of Housing and Urban Development have considered said Block 3, Parcel 14, Andreson Building to be a structurally sound building requiring modifica- tion only for the health and safety for the tenants of said building; and WHEREAS, the owner of the subject property, Allied Properties, have formally requested the Agency to make an offer to acquire their property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said request be refused and the Agency Counsel is instructed to inform Allied Properties of this action. III!IIIIIll ......... Adopted: 5/1/59 ~10tion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 1031, denying the request of Allied Properties. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Varner requested and was granted authority to meet with counsel for Allied Properties. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Austin told the Board Members that he had been asked to check with the City to see how they would participate in the construction of the parking structure for the Civic-Cultural Center. He stated that the City was very concerned that the fastest actions be taken. This has been initiated by awarding the preliminary study to Armstrong-Ulmer, Gruen Associates, Inc. In discussing the financial aspect of it, the City has no immediate means of participating in it. They are giving us their full cooperation and will endorse it. completely. They feel the Agency is in a better position to pay for it. Mr. Varner stated that there were no problems as to the Agency owning the property; however, it qjd not have the financial capacity to maintain the parking structure. He felt that now was the time to meet with City Officials to discuss and plan a concept for the payment of the parking structure. Mr. Austin, Mr. Quinn and Mr. Varner will meet with City Officials. The Members were supplied with a Balance Sheet for the month of March, 1969. Mr. Webster felt that this was very helpful because they could better under- stand the expenditures and remaining balance of Agency Funds. He recommended Mr. Quinn to supply the Members with this type of a Report once a month. The Chairman announced that a Special Meeting would be held on May 8, 1969. Mr. Wein was given a breakdown for the Item "Robert Hill, Appraiser", as re- quested in the Meeting of April 18, 1969. He felt that it was useless to review and approve expenditures that had already been paid, if there was some doubt as to the amount paid. Mr. Austin asked Mr. Wein, Mr. Webster and Mr. Quinn to work up a system by which such expenditures can be screened before payment. It was requested that such a system be presented to the Members at the next Regular Meeting and a policy established. ..... .... """'l1lI - 1152 ,... f;; Ii ..... Mr. Austin read a letter from Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes stating their interest in our forthcoming Central City Project R-79. Mr. Quinn stated that the Agency was getting indications of support for Bond Issues from local financial institutions, i.e. Bank of California, Crocker Citizens Bank, Bank of America, etc. Mr. Austin announced that barricade opening of the cross-streets between 2nd and 4th Streets would be on Friday, May 2, 1969, at 4:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the Meeting at 5:45 p.m. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ",.- '-- ,.... l' ..... ........ - THIS PAGE NOT USED .., ..... ....... - 1153 ,...... L MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 8TH DAY OF MAY, 1969, 323 COURT STREET, ROOM 305, SAN BERNARDINO, CALI FORNIA The Chairman reported that this Special Meeting was held pursuant to a duly dated and signed Notice of Special Meeting which was mailed to each and every member in due time, form and manner as required by law. Said notice is as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at the offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 Court Street, Room 305, in the City of San Bernardino, the regular meeting place thereof, at 4:00 p.m., on the 8th day of May, 1969, for the following purposes: ".... 1. To review proposals and enter into contract with local advertising firm regarding National Media Advertising, Central City Project. 2. To consider bids and award contract for Demolition and Site Clear- ance Unit No. 24, Calif. R-79. '-- DATED this 5th day of May, 1969. siP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, dr. Executive Director 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 5th day of May, 1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL WITNESS my hand this 5th day of May, 1969. siP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: [ Agency Members present: Webster, Austin & Wein Agency Members absent: Wilson Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Register, Secretary 1154 AG ENC Y ACT! ON: .... REVIEW PROPOSALS AND ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH LOCAL ADVERTISING FIRM REGARDING NATIONAL MEDIA ADVERTISING, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT. , ~ -.J Mr. Wilson arrived at the meeting at 4:08. Mr. Norman Rogers of the Norman Rogers Advertising firm was the first to give his proposal on the subject of national advertising media for our Central City Project. He gave a brief resume' of his personal interests. Mr. Rogers re- commended that we concentrate on the Wall Street Journal first and then National Real Estate Investor, Fortune Magazine and L. A. Times. He suggested an ad every Friday for four weeks in four sections of the country. Suggested budget for Wall Street Journal $4,000 ($1,000 per week). He stated the contract would contain proof of performance and affidavits. Mr. Don Blazer spoke for Co-ordinated Communications, Inc. He stated that his firm was mainly a public relations firm. Their first objective is not to sell, but create an interest and then sell. Mr. Blazer displayed a general concept for an advertising article. He suggested that we place ads in the Wall Street Journal, Pacific Coast edition and then National Real Estate Investor. He stated that the advertising firm receives a 15% commission from the medias in which they advertise. Mr. Pigeon of Pigeon and Associates submitted a proposal for an ad. Mr. Pigeon suggested that we mainly advertise in the National Real Estate Investor and then perhaps Wall Street Journal. He suggested a course of six months. He stated that an ad in the National Real Estate Investor would be a full page. The ad for the Wall Street Journal would be 4"wide 6" deep (2 columns). He suggested no illustration in Wall Street Journal, only ad. He stated that we stick with the Pacific edition. He suggested for the small amount of money that is available for advertising, that we advertise only in the National Real Estate Investor. Mr. Pigeon suggested that our ad request the interested developer to write on his own letterhead for a Redeveloper's packet. Mr. Wein suggested that we coordinate also with John S. Griffith/Curci-Turner Company regarding the ads since they are developers for the mall. Mr. Wilson suggested that we go with Wall Street Journal nationwide on a 30-day basis. .... '::,j 11 .~ ..... After much discussion the Members decided to accept the proposal of Normal Rogers Advertising. Mr. Quinn and Mr. Varner are to review proposal for approval. The following Resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1032 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CON- TRACT WITH NORMAL ROGERS ADVERTISING FOR ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 -. ........ 1155 -.... WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, with the United States of America, providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1968; and ,..... WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with advertising services for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Executive Director are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with Norman Rogers Advertising to provide for advertising services needed for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79. Total compensation under said contract not to exceed the sum of $10,000. Adopted: 5/8/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson adopting Resolution No. 1032. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None "..- AWARD CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE UNIT NO. 24, CALIF. R-79 TO DAKENO, INC. il..- Mr. Varner stated that he had reviewed all the bids that were received and that the bids were all in proper legal form. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1033 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 4, PARCEL 4, UNIT NO. 24, WITH DAKENO, INC., PROJECT NO CALIF. R-79 r L WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of 3-21-67, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a contract for demolition and site clearnace in the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Dakeno, Inc. is the low bidder on said Unit No. 24 and qualified to accomplish the work involved; it is in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid of $13,400.00. 1156 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that said bid of Dakeno, Inc., in the sum of $13,400.00, be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 24 on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 5/8/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster adopting Resolution No. 1033. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 5:25. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None lIIIIlI -i ., ~ ....-l ...... -...II 1157 [ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the Meeting to order at 4:10 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Wilson, Austin, Webster and Wein Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, and Mrs. Contreras, Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 1, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 1, 1969, as submitted. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None f""- The Minutes of the Special Meeting of May 8, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of the Special Meeting of May 8, 1969, as submitted. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None i '-- EXPEND ITURES: The expenditures for the month of April, 1969, were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson approving the expenditures for the month of April, 1969, as submitted. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: L. Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, stated that he had nothing to report at this time. Mr. Varner stated that the Chairman should give a report on the Board Members' trip to Washington. Mr. Austin mentioned that the newspaper had done a good job on the handling of their trip to Washington. Mr. Austin stated that they had met with Mr. Herrod, Assistant to Mr. Romney, and Mr. Haas, Central Office Administrator, to inform them on both the Central City and Civic-Cultural Center Parking Structures. He stated that the meeting with Congressman Pettis and his assistants had been very enlightening, and it was gratifying to know that Congressman Pettis was on the City of San Bernardino's side, and that he was doing everything possible to keep the project going on an accelerated basis. He felt that the trip to Washington was so successful, that it was just a matter of getting the amendatory documents to HUD for approval. ,... n 1158 Mr. Wilson stated that the trip's results justified such a trip. He pointed out that a personal appearance was the best way to express the need for an additional amendatory for the parking structure. He stated that he was im- pressed by the knowledge the two HUD Officials had of the Agency's Projects. He commended the Chairman for doing a beautiful job in presenting the projects and explaining to HUD what the needs were. He also stated that the Mayor had given great support. Mr. Wilson felt that as a result of this trip and the support of HUD Officials in Washington, that the delivery of this project would be sooner than anticipated. Mr. Wein stated that this trip had been very worthwhile. He feels that a per- sonal presentation is the best means of communication to explain problems and get better results, and that this should be done in the future when the need arises. JIIIIIIIl - Mr. Varner stated that Washington Officials had given them a tremendous recep- tion. He feels that San Bernardino can be held as an example for other rede- velopment agencies across the Country. VICTOR GRUEN STUDY WEST-END RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: Dan Branigan of Victor Gruen, Associates, gave a report on the West-End Study. He explained the land uses that were proposed by the Victor Gruen Study for the West-End. Two 202 High Rises were proposed along with a convalescent hospital, motel, restaurant, two services stations and a medical building. He estimated this project at 10 million dollars. He also suggested that this project should be a one package deal, instead of piecemeal. The two 202 High Rise buildings would be 12 stories high, with a total of approximately 600 apartments. He explained that the best use for these High Rise would be for low income elderly. He estimated the rental for these High Rises to be approximately $68.50 to $114.00 per month. These figures were comparable to a 202 High Rise in Santa Monica. ~ )~ ~ ....;j Mr. Joe Baker, Sun-Telegram, queried Mr. Branigan, as to why he thought elderly people were better suited for these High Rise; didn't they (the elderly) already have a living place; and how did they know if the apartments would fill up soon? Mr. Branigan informed Mr. Baker that 1) there were 16,000 elderly people living in San Bernardino; 2) true, they have a place to live, but maybe they are not happy or their living standards are not adequate, and 3) from past experience with other 202 High Rises, there are waiting lists ten months in advance. Mr. Quinn stated that the Agency has received calls from elderly people wanting information for application for the 202 High Rise being constructed in Meadow- Brook Project. RESOLUTION OF COMPLIANCE - JACK GREENWOOD, REUSE PARCEL 63, CALIF. R-10: ~ - 1159 r- t ! L... The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1034 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO JACK GREENWOOD WHEREAS, Jack Greenwood, hereinafter called the Redeveloper, has entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated June 15, 1967, was recorded on September 13, 1968, in Book 7093 on page 13 and said Grant Deed, dated June 15, 1967, was recorded on September 13, 1968, in Book 7093 on page 38, both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redeveloper covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and --- WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Deed to furnish the Redeveloper with an instrument certifying completion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof; and WHEREAS, said real property is described as: Lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Block "A", F. J. HALLS SUBDIVISION, in the City of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps, page 45, records of said County. Together with the west half of the alley closed, adjoining on the East, by Resolution of Mayor and Common Council of said City on January 10, 1927, recorded January 5, 1946, in Book 1851 of Official Records, page 385. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED in accordance with Section 4 of said Agreement and Section 4 of said Grant Deed, that the Agency does hereby conclusively certify and give notice that the Redeveloper has fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agreements with respect to the obligation of Redevelopers for the construction of improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinafter described real property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". "....- ,.. i ~ Adopted: 5/22/69 ..... 1160 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1034. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ...... ..... AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 847 REGARDING REMOVAL OF PALM TREES IN MEADOWBROOK PROJECT R-10: Mr. Quinn explained to the Members that an error had been made in Resolution No. 847 whereby Project R-19 had been designated instead of Meadowbrook Project R-10. To correct this error the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1035 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS FOR REMOVAL OF PALM TREES, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has, under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project No.1; and ... WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage a contractor for the removal of palm -.J trees in the Meadowbrook Project; and WHEREAS, bids were received for said services, and the Agency having reviewed the bids found and determined that the bid of Pres co Building Materials appears to be in the best interest of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Bid of Presco Building Materials is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are authorized to enter into a Contract for said removal of Palm Trees, not to exceed the sum of $1,675~00. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 847. Adopted: 5/22/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1035. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT WITH KRUEPER ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF RIALTO & "E" SIGNAL SYSTEM: ...... - 1161 ,... ..... Mr. Wein asked what the cost for the installation of these signal system would be. Mr. Desrochers, Agency Operation Officer, stated it would cost in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $25,000. Mr. Desrochers stated this would include the cost of connecting into the Central City Traffic Signalization System. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1036 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR- MAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH KRUEPER ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of October 24, 1958 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, the Agency has engaged the services of Krueper Engineering and Asso- ciates to perform a traffic study for the Central City Project and surround- ing area; and "..- --- WHEREAS, the Agency desires the services of Krueper Engineering and Associates to design a Master-Interconnect Traffic Signalization System at Ria1to and E Street to be compatible with the Central City Traffic System. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Krueper Engineering and Associates for the design of a Traffic Signal System at Ria1to and E Streets at a cost not to exceed $900.00. Adopted: 5/22/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1036. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AMENDMENT NO.3, CONTRACT WITH ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING, FOR SURVEY SERVICES R-79, INCREASING UPSET FIGURE TO $45,000: ,.... Mr. Quinn explained that because Real Estate had been using the Arrowhead Engineering services for real estate purposes, that the funds had been exhausted, therefore, it was necessary to increase the upset figure by $10,000 for a con- tract total of $45,000. The following resolution was introduced: ...... 1062 RESOLUTION NO. 1037 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 3 WITH ARROW- HEAD ENGINEERING FOR SURVEY SERVICES, CALIF. R-79 ..... ..... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, entered into a Contract with Arrowhead Engineering for Survey Services for the Central City Project dated the 15th day of November, 1967; and WHEREAS, the Agency executed Contract Amendment No.1 the 6th day of August, 1968, and Amendment No.2 the 19th day of November, 1968, and WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Agency to enter into Contract Amendment No.3 increasing the upset figure of the Contract by $10,000, in light of future work which the Contractor will be doing for the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No.3 with Arrowhead Engineering for Survey Services Contract increasing the upset figure to $45,000. Adopted: 5/22/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1037. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .... ....... CHANGE ORDER NO.9, UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79, FONTANA PAVING, INC: Mr. Wein asked how many more light bases there were. Mr. Desrochers informed him that these were the last ones. He stated that old bases had been success- fully used in approximately 30 locations. That this was the second or third new base used out of thirty. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1038 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.9 WITH FON- TANA PAVING, INC., SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving, Inc., for Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed the 17th day of January, 1969; Change Order No. 2 was executed the 7th day of February, 1969; Change Order No.3 was executed the 7th day of March, 1969; Change Order No.4 was executed the 18th day of April, 1969; Change Order No.5 was executed the 4th day of April, 1969; Change Order No.6 was executed on'the l8th day of April, 1969; Change Order No.7 was executed on the 24th day of April, 1969; and Change Order No.8 was executed on the 2nd day of May, 1969; and ~ ......, 1063 '- WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Contractor to install two light pole bases at 2nd and G and 2nd and F for the sum of $800, and to increase the contract completion date by two additional days. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.9 with Fontana Paving, Inc., Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, increasing the services of the contractor for an amount not to exceed $800. ,.....- Adopted: 5/22/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1038. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.2, UNIT 3, PHASE II, GRIGGS-NORWOOD INC: Mr. Austin said he had received an anonymous letter regarding the errors and money being spent by the Agency because of not knowing what is being done. He stated he was glad of the decrease in contract price. Mr. Desrochers stated that contractor would be out of the site area by July 15, 1969. If the Western Union property has not been released by that date, it will most likely be deleted from the contract. The following resolution was introduced: ~ ....... RESOLUTION NO. 1039 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 WITH GRIGGS-NORWOOD, INC., UNIT 3, PHASE II, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a contract with Griggs-Norwood, Inc., for the Site Preparation Unit No.3, Phase II, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed the 21st day of February, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to require the Contractor to revise the scope of work to include the revisions in the gradlng and storm drain plans of Gruen Associates, Inc., No. 4658, pages CE 1B dated May 6, 1969; SO 1C, 2C, and 3C dated April 21, 1969. WHEREAS, the Contractor has agreed to perform said services according tb the revisions as mentioned above for a decrease in the Contract of $1,981.50. "..,. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.2 to contract with Griggs-Norwood, Inc., Unit No. 3, Phase II, Calif. R-79, to decrease contract payment in the amount of $1 ,981 .50. Adopted: 5/22/69 ... 1064 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1039. Motion was Carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .... n ..." RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE, ISSUANCE AND DELIVERY OF PROJECT NOTES AND THE EXECUTION OF REQUISITION AGREEMENTS: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1040 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE, ISSUANCE AND DELIVERY OF PROJECT NOTES AND THE EXECUTION OF REQUISITION AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California (herein called the "Local Issuing Agenci') is undertaking the development and/or operation of one or more urban renewal, low-rent housing or redevelop- ment projects and may engage in such undertakings in respect to additional projects all pursuant to the terms of one or more contracts (which contracts and any contract in substitution thereof, together with any supplements thereto or amendments or waivers of any provisions thereof, are herein called the "Contract") with the United States of America (herein called the "Government") providing for a loan by the Government to the Local Issuing Agency for financing the urban renewal, low-rent housing or redevelopment project(s) described in the Contract and herein called the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Local Issuing Agency proposes to obtain loans from others than the Government in anticipation of the delivery of notes to the Government, which loans shall be evidenced by negotiable short-term notes of the Local Issuing Agency (herein called "Project Notes"); and WHEREAS, the Local Issuing Agency proposes to issue Project Notes as hereinafter provided: ~ ...., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Local Issuing Agency as Follows: Section 1. For the purpose of providing funds to pay expenses incurred or to be incurred pursuant to the Contract or to refund, renew or extend its out- standing Notes issued in connection therewith, the Local Issuing Agency hereby determines to issue its Project Notes for purchase by the public from time to time in amounts which shall not exceed the aggregate loan amount or the Actual Development Cost specified in the Contract, as the case may be. Such Project Notes shall be in such principal amounts, bear such interest rates, be dated and mature, all as prescribed in this Resolution. Section 2. a. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to advertise from time to time the public sale of Project Notes of the Local Issuing Agency by causing the publication of a Notice of Sale thereof in a newspaper pursuant to State Law, if required, and in The Daily Bond Buyer, a financial newspaper published in the City of New York, New York. The Notice ~ - 1065 "....... of Sale for publication locally shall be substantially in the form of HUD-9001, which is incorporated herein by reference. The Notice of Sale to be published in the Daily Bond Buyer may be included in a consolidated Notice of Sale. Each Notice of Sale shall be published at intervals in accordance with a schedule of advertising arranged in cooperation with the Government. Each separate issue of Project Notes advertised for sale shall be numbered in consecutive series. b. Each proposal submitted for all or a part of any series of Pro- ject Notes shall be in substantially the form of HUD-9002, which is incorporated herein by reference, and is hereby approved by the Local Issuing Agency. Section 3. a. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed on each date specified in a duly published advertisement of the Notice of Sale for a series of Project Notes and at the time and place mentioned therein to receive, open and review all proposals received for the purchase of Project Notes. Upon completion of the review, the contents of all proposals shall be communicated by telephone to the Government with a recommendation for award. b. The Executive Director after receiving Government appro- val of a recommended award is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Local Issuing Agency to award the Project Notes at the lowest interest rate or rates not in excess of the percentage rate per annum specified in the Contract or under State Law offered in the proposals without reference to premiums; Provided however, that as among proposals specifying the same lowest interest rate, awards shall be made on the basis of the highest premium per dollar principal amount of the Notes specified in such proposals. The Executive Director shall promptly notify each successful bidder by telegram of the principal amount of Project Notes so awarded to such bidder. Section 4. Each of the Project Notes of the Local Issuing Agency shall be in sub- s tanti ally the form of HUD-901 0, whi ch is i ncorpora ted herei n by reference. Each series of Project Notes shall bear a date not later than the date on which they are to be delivered to the purchaser and shall mature within a term of not to exceed 18 months from their date. Each series of Project Notes shall bear interest at the rate or rates per annum fixed in the proposal or proposals accepted for the purchase of such Notes, shall be issued in such denominations, and both principal and interest thereof shall be payable at such incorporated bank having trust powers or incorporated trust company as the purchaser designates in his proposal, and shall be secured by a "Requisition Agreement" in substantially the form of HUD-9003, which is incorporated herein by reference, to be entered into between the Local Issuing Agency and the Government. Section 5. Each of the Project Notes issued in a series which has been awarded shall be executed in the name of the Local Issuing Agency by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Secretary is authorized and directed to date and to cause the seal of the Local Issuing Agency to be impressed, imprinted or reproduced thereon and to attest such sealing, and the aforesaid officers shall take all other actions necessary to complete delivery of any Project Notes which have been awarded. Section 6. Each RequiSition Agreement securing one or more series of Project Notes shall be executed in the name of the Local Issuing Agency by ,.... '-- --- "... ! i .... 1066 the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Secretary is authorized and directed to cause the seal of the Local Issuing Agency to be impressed, imprinted or reproduced thereon and to attest the same. Section 7. The Executive Director is authorized and directed to deliver the Project Notes by signing and promptly sending after acceptance of each proposal a letter to each paying agent for such Project Notes in substantially the form of HUD-9004, which is incorporated herein by reference, and to transmit therewith (a) the Project Notes for which the addressee is the paying agent for delivery and payment and (b) a signature certificate and receipt, in accor- dance with the terms of the letter, and to take such other actions as may be re- quired to complete the delivery transaction in accordance with the terms of the letter to the paying agent. Section 8. The Chairman and Secretary are authorized to take all actions as may be required to validate and complete delivery of the Project Notes herein authorized to be issued from time to time. Section 9. For the punctual payment of the principal of and interest on each series of Project Notes, the Local Issuing Agency expressly and irrevocably promises to pay any sums which may be received from the Government pursuant to the Requisition Agreement relating to such series of Project Notes and each such Requisition Agreement when executed by the Government is declared to be and is hereby assigned by the Local Issuing Agency for the benefit of the holder or holders from time to time of such series of Project Notes. All contributions funds and amounts authorized or required by the Contract to be applied to the payment of Project Loan Notes (referred to in the Contract as IIProject Tem- porary Loan Obligations,1I IIAdvance Notesll or IIPermanent Notesll) as issued in connection with the Project are irrevocably pledged to secure the payment of the principal of and interest to maturity on each series of Project Notes. Such pledge and the lien created thereby shall cease and terminate as to any series of Project Notes when monies or investment securities convertible into cash not later than the maturity date of such Notes, sufficient and for the purpose of paying the principal and interest to maturity on such Notes, are deposited with the paying agent or agents for such Notes. Section 10. The Executive Director is authorized and directed to pay (a) to the Government such amount of such funds of the Local Issuing Agency as may be available for such purpose and as may be necessary to pay the principal of and interest on obligations of the Local Issuing Agency then held by the Govern- ment which may be refunded in part by anyone or more series of Project Notes, and (b) to the paying agent or agents of any then outstanding series of Project Notes, or to the Government for transmittal to said paying agent or agents, such amount of funds of the Local Issuing Agency as may be available for such pur- pose and as may be necessary to pay the principal of and interest on such Project Notes which are refunded in part by succeeding issues of Project Notes. Section 11. The Local Issuing Agency hereby covenants with the holders from time to time of any Project Notes issued under this resolution that it will not amend this resolution in any way which would limit or alter the rights of such holders under Section 9 hereof or otherwise impair the rights and remedies of such holders until such Project Notes, together with interest thereon, and ...... - ..... .... ..... - 1067 [ all costs, expenses and damages in connection with any action or proceedings by or on behalf of such holders are fully met and discharged. Section 12. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted: 5/22/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1040. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF PROJECT LOAN NOTES IN CONNECTION WITH URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-10: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1041 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF PROJECT LOAN NOTES IN CONNECTION WITH URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-10 ,...... WHEREAS the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California (herein called the "Loca1 Public Agency") is duly authorized and proposes to undertake and carry out a certain urban renewal or redevelopment project (designated Project No. Calif. R-10) of the character authorized by law with financial aid by the United States of America (herein called the "Government"), in the form of a Project Temporary Loan under T1t1e I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1450 et seq.), which maybe made by the Government to the Local Public Agency with respect to said Project in accordance with a certain Loan and Grant Contract (herein called the "Contract"), by and between the Local Public Agency and the Government; and """""" WHEREAS, in order to enable the Local Public Agency to obtain such financial aid, it is necessary for the Local Public Agency to authorize and, from time to time, issue certain obligations in the form of Project Loan Notes, as here- inafter provided: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Local Public Agency as follows: [ Section 1. Whenever the following terms, or any of them, are used in this Resolution the same, unless the context shall indicate another or different meaning or intent, shall be construed, are used, and are intended to have mean- i ng s as f 011 ows : (1) The term "Resolution" shall mean this Resolution. (2) All other terms used in this Resolution and which are defined in the Contract shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Contract. Section 2. The Contract entered into between the Local Public Agency and the Government for the above identified Project is hereby declared to be a 1863 part of this Resolution and all applicable provlslons thereof shall be deemed incorporated herein to the same extent as if the provisions thereof were expressly set forth in full herein. ---. - Section 3. In order to evidence payments made by the Government on account of the Project Temporary Loan pursuant to the Contract with respect to the Project and to refund, renew, extend or substitute for any Note by this Reso- lution authorized to be issued (or any such Note by any other resolution authorized to be issued and which is outstanding, or on deposit for delivery pending payment therefor, as of the date this Resolution becomes effective), there are hereby authorized to be issued, from time to time, Project Loan Notes of the Local Public Agency in an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time (whether authorized by this Resolution or any other resolution authorizing the issuance of Project Loan Notes) not in excess of the amount of the Project Temporary Loan available under the Contract. Section 4. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to file with the Government from time to time as funds are required, requisitions, together with the necessary supporting documents, requesting payments to be made on account of the Project Temporary Loan available under the Contract, and the proper officers of the Local Public Agency shall prepare, execute and deliver to the Government Notes hereinafter authorized and shall accept payment therefor from the Government in the form of cash or other Notes issued by the Local Public Agency, and such officers are authorized to do and perform all other things and acts required to be done or performed in order to obtain such payments. Cash proceeds from the issuance of all Project Loan Notes shall be deposited and disbursed only in accordance with the provisions of the Contract. Section 5. Each Project Loan Note shall bear interest and be payable in the form and manner prescribed by the Contract and this Resolution; shall be signed in the name of the Local Public Agency by the Chairman or Vice Chairman attested by the Secretary; and shall otherwise be in substantially the form of HUD-9107 which is incorporated herein by reference. Section 6. This Resolution shall supersede all previous resolutions authorizing Project Temporary Loan Notes, and the Project Loan Notes authorized by this Resolution shall be exchanged for any Project Temporary Loan Notes heretofore issued pursuant to any previous resolution. ..... ...." Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted: 5/22/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1041. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO. 10, UNIT NO.4, FONTANA PAVING, INC: This Change Order consists of the replacing of bad soil with Class 2 aggregate base. Mr. Webster suggested that when contract for Civic-Cultural Center is drawn up, would it not be better to include in the contract the bringing in ...... - 1069 r ~ of additional base if necessary. Mr. Quinn stated that this would only tend to increase the overall cost of the contract because contractor would have to make provisions in case this happened. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1042 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 WITH FONTANA PAVING. INC. SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.4. CALIF. R-79 '""-' WHEREAS. the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving. Inc. .fbr Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December. 1968; and WHEREAS. Change Order No.1 was executed the 17th day of January, 1969; Change Order No.2 was executed the 7th day of February. 1969; Change Order No.3 was executed the 7th day of March, 1969; Change Order No.4 was executed the 18th day of April. 1969; Change Order No.5 was executed the 4th day of April 1969; Change Order No.6 was executed on the 18th day of April. 1969; Change Order No.7 was executed on the 24th day of April 1969; Change Order No. 8 was executed on the 2nd day of May. 1969; and Change Order No.9 is pending execution; and WHEREAS. it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Contractor by excavating the soil in the area of 4th and IIGII Streets and replacing same with Class 2 aggregate Base for the sum of $963.97. and to increase the contract completion date by two additional days. ,.-- NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 10 with Fontana Paving Inc.. Site Preparation Unit No.4 Calif. R-79. increasing the services of the contractor for an amount not to exceed $963.97. Adopted: 5-22-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1042. Motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wein. Wilson. Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: ,... ~ ~... " ...... Letters were presented to the Members regarding any possible conflict of interest pertaining to former Chairman of the Board. Warner W. Hodgdon. participating as a developer in an Urban Renewal Area. Said letters are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. After review and discussion, motion was made and seconded reconfirming the Agency's past policy regarding any possible conflicts of interest. determining that each individual case would be considered by the Agency Board seperate1y on its own merits. The motion was unanimously carried. 1070 Mr. Austin brought it to the Members attention that he had been contacted by a major developer who was interested in the development of the west-end. He stated that the developer was not willing to go into preliminary planning and would not spend any money for such planning until he was assured the possibility of a one package deal. Mr. Wilson said he was of the opinion that the west-end should not be considered for piecemeal disposition. He said that developers interested should be assured that this would be a package offer. He also stated that he would not support any move for piecemeal disposition. ..... - Mr. Wein suggested that the developer should at least spend a few thousand dollars and present a plot plan. After all the Members stated their support for a package deal for the west-end, the Chairman announced that the developer interested was Mr. Robert Curci, of Curci-Turner Company. Mr. Webster asked how many proposals have been submitted for the construction of the Mall. Mr. Quinn informed him that bids were usually not submitted until minutes before opening of the bids, and that Bid opening would be June 2, 1969. Mr. Quinn informed the Members that Curci-Turner, John S. Griffith Company had been changed to "Centra1 City Corporation". Mr. Webster asked about the status of the Masonic Building. Mr. Varner informed nim that trial date was June 16, 1969. ..... Western Union - will be moved out the last part of July. Present problem is about eligibility of payment. ...... Bank of America - award of contract will be end of June Winstead Property - They have until November to commence construction. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Motion was carried ~y the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absen' one ...., ....... ,.- I ~. \...;. ~~:-'~/i~~~ij~ ~\ ....'.* U'I......1 * 0 ~. ,'.ll~! : lk '-"I: .. ~a.;,jU.. ..f!> ~>> .... '\ I OEPARnllcNT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT .:ill 'GOL!,I~N GA"l E A Ve:., P.O. BOX 36086, SAN FRANCISCO, CA L.IF.. 1l4\ 02 REGION VI AfLic€"ofResi ona 1 CUt' n::: c 1 I fQ) ~[~ C.;} E. . ~ ,'& .ft '1"'17;1;~" Uu I IN REPL.Y REFER TO. , '." 2 . . ' 6 . .., 0.' .. I 'I~t"'''l .J .,.:'.. :. .~;O~l -- GL "-Bruce'- D.Varner ,,,,., .licm:ergan ,,;ford.em [,. Gr e shman k:torney;sat Law ',.;398 f1est Fourth St-r:f'0't ':\:SaJ1Be"rnardino, C;cJifornia r.C'f:cr.S/~f1. fORD;';'; :I? r:"1';:('''''~'MAY 2' 0 1969 . . . -.. l.: \~vi ~:ti';: 92401 .J)earMr. Varner: '. ,Subject: l\~xlevelopmeDt .Agency of the City of San Bernardino Que~tion on Conflict of Interest .....:,:;::.:Bli'C..u. :i.n"t'-e:f~'~1'.'C:t tc'~y'CU'rhtter of April 23, 1969 asking us for any ....~ederal rules. regulations or policies covering the situation where the /,%,Q.rmer Chairman .of the Redevelopment Agency, who served through February, '.:1969, may -act as ar-ed.;:veloper in. one or more of the Redevelopment pro- jects in San ~ernaiQino. We assume he is no longer a member of the "aoverning .body ..of..tileligency. You say there is no state la,.j to prohibit him from acting as such a redeveloper. . <; r- . : Your attention is directed to Stiga11'vs City of Taft, 375 p2 289, which Ueld that even;though a city council member who held an interest in a -...-' t.. ,'plmnbing company resigned just prior to acceptance. of plumbing company's ,~ow bid, the contract was invalid under conflict of interest statutes, n"':we-re the resigning councilman had participated in preliminary discussions, ..comprises, drawing of plans and specifications and solicitation of bids ~rior to his resignation. This case serves to point out, at best, that Tesignation or expiration of ~ members term does not per se clear a transaction from a possible conflict of 'interest situation in the event ',tite A~~-stroult3subsequemly deal with a former member. r r ! .;.:: r ~. -.' :~. -,'," (. 'The Department with respect to certain other Federal Aid Programs has adopted a policy to the effect that the recipient body may n?t enter into -. any contract or arrangement in connection with any Project or' any property ,included or planned t.o b.e.i.ncluded in any Proj~ct in ,.}hich any member, officer or employee of the local body during his tenure or for one year .:.ti1er~~er luls .any interest , direct or indirect. ""..- -::"'. ',;,.::rhe :rea.son .a-nd''P~tT'?of'~.~for',thisPQlicy would appear to be equally app1ic- -?"_h''i'nyeuT~i;culo<)..t' situation. In view of the aforesaid it may be "ceemedra.a.sonably ~dv.i:'.S-ab1e for the Agency not to enter into transactions ~;~'mth.a :::f'ormermemh'er:for at least a year thereby foreclosing a possible " -.." 4 ~ , ...... '., ,., '~'-"''''', ~._---.-_._.-.---:-:---.-------;.__....--_.._.~._.-::.,.,'~~; ';".-,'" ""-.-." .' ." -;-- '. . " , .. l'i' .. :. ~.. I . . :'. ~ '-'0'. . . :. WARNER W. HODGDON '. 323 COURT STREET - SUITE 304 SAN 8ERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92401 ..... TURNIZ:R 5-4726 May 5, 1969 4 1 ....., Mr. Bruce D. Varner, Atty. Lonergan Jordan & Gresham 398 W. 4th Street Son Bernardino, California 92401 Dear Bruce: I received your letter dated April 24, 1969 (Encl. No.1) along with your letter of April 23, 1969 (Encl. No.2) to Mr. William N()rth, Regional Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development I 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San FrC?ncisco, California 94102. ~ As you know, after receiving the above correspondence, I discussed . this matter wi~n you by telephone. My first concern being any repercus- sion on the part of Mr. Boyce Harper's letter (Encl. No .3), in that it was possibly construed as a quasi legal opinion. .... -if .... The initiation of my inquiry to Boyce at~ the time was based on two prime considerations: The first being that Pete h.ad taken a few days off . for 0 well deserved rest, the second; Boyce as Deputy Director, has many .yecrs of seniority and experience with HUD Operations on which to dra'w on. Th.erefore,in sincerely assisting to the best of his knowledge he answ'ered my inquiry by letter. I con readily understand, under the circumstances, that you believe 'my inquiry appears to be a I egal matter, and I certainly concur with ::"':"your analogy of requesting HUD clarification. I returned the original letter to Boyce and thanked him for substantiating my understanding. I also am unaware of any provisions in the HUD Manual that prohibits former members of a non-salaried agency, appointed by the Mayor and Common Counsel under State law, from acquiring property and developing some in accordance with the terms, conditions, plans, and specifications which meet the standards end qual ificatiQns for same. . .... ........ ~ : May 5, 1969 '. ,.... '- Page 2 It would be 0 sincere disappointment in the final analysis to be the subiect of the penalty of freely giving two.years of concentrated effort, with its. great financial burden, and then culminate this with a restriction on my htsto rico I livelihood . As you know, prior to accepting the time consu...ning responsibilities of Chairman, I owned and developed major structures within the central area of the Ci ty. . Coupled with the above, rhave a responsible desire to personally initiate investment wHhin the project areas, over and above the possible economic return attainable, through the course of recognized business 'standards. This is to support the strength of the convictions, that I as well . os the Agency Boardprojected for the previous two years, by injecting · personal economic faith in our decisions and confidence toward the future of the projects. "..- . This in my belief has a more fqr reaching foundation to build on, thon to retain such small vision os to 0 pathetic conclusion that there is an advantage in the hard earned knowledge of what at 011 time is complete public information. Along with the known fact the execution and extension of some requires further individual Agency Board acceptance, unprejudiced HUD concurrence and additional pub.lic advertisement. .... I...- I might add that in May 1965, I entered into on agreement for purchase of Reuse Parcels 41 and 42 in the Me:Idowbrook R-10 Project Area. This was accepted by the Agency at that time along with 0 deposit of $3,100, hbwever I I was unable to complete the transaction and therefore did not request return of said deposite, os so many have, for it was given in good . faith'. I have apprised you of this transaction only to exemplify the longevity of my fair practices in the projects. I believe the Agency is on 0 firm basis and to my knowledge, its physical ;. end economical potential will soon be realized. I know the Agency Boord end yourself has given me complete support in the past and ( appreciate )'Our confidence in any future participation, os noted by the Agency letter doted April 25, 1969. (Encl. No.4) . There will likewise be continued support from myself in either event, sho~ld the forthcoming lesal decision by HUDimp'~se an additional liability with my post position. Sincerely yours, ".... t L. c//~ -Vk~r W. Hodgdon WWH:djs Enclosures (4) .... - -,..,... --~. C;a... Oictrihufinn lid . . .. DISTRIB UTI ON Redevel<?prnent Agency Board Members: Messrs. AI M. Austin, Chairman ,Ray M. Wilson, Vice Chairman E. George Webster Sanford H. Wein Peter W. Quinn, J r" Executive Director ~ Boyce Harper, Deputy Di rector . Mayor At C. Ballard City of San Bernardi no . Mr. William North Regional Counsel Department of Housing and Urban Development ~50 Golden Gate Ave, Son Francisco, Calif. 94102 , . Me. James Richardson Assistant Regional Administrator Department of Housing and Urban Development 450 Golden Gate Ave, San Francisco, Cal if. 94102 ... \ ~ lIIIIlIII I , I ....., ... :i L . . ....", ..., -- [ ~ ".'"'.... '-- r- , '-- I>ONALD W. JORDAN .JOHN S. LONERGAN ALLEN S. GRESHAM BRUCE D. VARNER PATRICK J. MORRIS PHILIP M. SAVAGE, m atAlO S. JORDAN LAW OFFlCES LONERGA....""" JORD.A....1\f & GRE SILUI 39B WEST f"OURTH STREET SAN BER.'1ARDIXO, CALlFom.u. 92401 TELEPHONE: (714) eS4-Z"171 , April 24, 1969 ~ Mr. Warner Hodgdon 323 W. Court Street Suito 308 San Bernardino, Cnlifornin Dear ilarner: I have been furnished \-~:!. th ll. copy of a letter dated April 1, 1969, addressod to you and signed by B. J. }tarp~r, Jr., indicating that, in his opinion, there is no problem under state 1m! vith rezpcct to your acting as a rcdovclop~r in any rcdcvclop~cnt project under the jurisdiction of the City of San Bernardino. Since this appoars to D3 a legal ~ntter, it haa been referred to m3 for review. ..i, ~ I h~ve revie~~ed your request, ~nd it appo~rs that the problem--if ~ny problem c:~dsts--W'ould arise under federal laws, rcgulntions ~nd policies, rather than st~te law. Accordingly, 1 have \y~itten to the Regional Counsel of the. Depart-;nent of. Hcuni~g and Urb<:m Dc".elcpr.'\~nt. requesting . their opinion. 1 Gm enclosing for your records a copy of my lettor. . In view of the feet that Mr. ~arperrn letter did not mention the federal lnws or poliCies, you ~ay dis- regard his let-ter, and I \-1111 furnish you tri th a formal opinion when we have heard fro~ the office of Regional CounDol of the . Department of Housing and Urbirn Development. If you hnvc ~ny questions concerning this n~tter, ~ please do not hesitate to contact me. Very trJly yours, ~?,~;J J ,/J4,..AlU/ ~~~e-1J. Varner Counsel for the ~edevelvp~ent Agency of San Eernardino ~. SOV:ja co: P. W. Quinn, Jr. . " ....._~, ~_..... ~ , DONALD W. JORDAN dOHN B. LONERGAN ALLEN B. GRESHAM BRUCE D. VARNER PATRICK J. MORRIS PHILIP H. SAVAGE, m CRAlO S. JORDAN LA....' OFFICES LONERGAN, JORD.A.l.~ & GRE S:I:LUI 39B weST F"OURTH STREET 8A.,( BER....ARDP.iO. CALIFOR.'HA 02.101 TUEPtiONE (714\ 884-2171 , Apx-i.l 23, 19(;9 Mr. William North Regional Counsel Dcparf...m~nt of Housing and Urbnn Oevelol'l:'len t 450 Golden Gate Avenue San FrancitJcc, Californ!n 94102 De.:tr }lr. North ~ ,.' Mr. tl.arnor Hod0dO!l # fOrI!ler Chzdrf'1an of the San Bcrnardi110 Redevclopnont Agency, has indicated an interest in acting a~ :l redeveloper in one Ol' mort') or the redevolopment projects ~Jrr(~ntly under tho jurisdic- tion of tt~e n.e~ovt::l!')p~~ent 1\gency of the Ci t:r of San nernardino. From our rcvie~'1 of thl}:! nat-te::: I .!.t appears there are no atato l~.<ln that would prohibit !'jr.. Hocqdon fro,] acting as ~uch i'\ r~dcvolor'o::. F.o"!"'ev~r, \'te ,!otilc1 apprec1nte your opinion a~ to ~met~cr thcr0 ere any federal rules, regulations or policies cO',ering thin f.::atter. For ~rour 1nfonr:~t.1onJ Nr. Hodgdon sa'l:vod ~$ Chain"lan of the San 'Bernardino Ecdevelcpm9nt Agency from April, 1967 through February, 19G9. We would appreciate hearin7 fro~ you at your earliest convenienco. Very truly yours# '" ~~~~ J ~41.e.<....J obrUCG U; Varrl~r CoUnsel for the Redaveloprnent Agency of San Bernardino 8DV:js eel P. W. Quinn, Jr. Warner Hodgdon .. ; l' .., I -..J ~ .... .';: J' ~ ...J -, ..... . '. . . . ' : r....REID~W~L@Pb]~illT &~~m~w Of THE CITY Of SRn BfRnHROlnO, 'CRLlfORnIR " ~ . " ...... I , . I i' j. I MEMBERS WARNER W. HODGDON. CHAIRMAN RAY M. WII.SON, VICE.CHAlnMAN AI- M. AUSTIN E. GEORGE WEBSTER SANFORD H. WEIN , . "lITER VI. QUINN. JR. EXEO::UTIVE DIRECTOR SE:CRETARY.TREAlJURER ; , 323 COURT STRC:ET SAN ElERNAROINO, CAL.ll"ORNIA e:UOI PHONE TURN:;:R a-1311 P. O. SOX 1557 , " . . . . -.; , , . "... . . 1 April. 1969 -- ;, '. : 'i .. i i I l .' I ; !' . ,." Mr. Warner Hodgdon '323 Court Street · San Bernardino. California , '. :., ~ '.: ./ ..... " ,. .. \. ". ;. ", Dear Mr. Hodgdon: .I :: ' i; I' ; , ' . i :"..-. ' , ; ! i" i I'i- - I ' - I I have revie~'/ed the -California CO:JJ11:mity R-=development law and. in mY opinion. ther~ is no language contained in this Law that '.~ ,prohibits a form~r Board Ne:TIbei~ of a Red~velopm~nt Agency frcra becoming a developer in an Urban Renewal Project Area. ':. In my opinion, there are no provisions in the Department or Housing and Urban Deve10pilient rules and policies that would prohibit a former Board Member from becoming a developer within a project area uncler the jUr1sdict.ion Qf the. Redevalcp-":. ment ~gency i~ question. t .'-/."': .:':' ,\ I -i i I I i . .' :-"",.-', ;..:... , ." :... ., .\ .~. - . , .. ::.."V~{;~fl~~q .. ft;ttJft/pe7. 'Sr2Ji' . .Deputy Dire.ctor -~ .... . :, !" '. . '::"".1,. . , . 8JH:nm .., :1 ,'. ':. ............; .. ". I I ir- , ~". ..." .. ..-:.~:. . . ," ....... . '. -.-.. " ... " '. \ . I " : I ..... . ,. 'I. I ... ~,~ Member of ~.;:,._~c..f.i.~TlC'i' ....'* i!!f ~ ~ l:: ~ ~. ~; \\:. ". "" " .. '-.... . " ." ~ :- f .' ~ I '-P -.,,1 ...,~."..; ..... ........ ..., :B ~1 ..... ...... - 1071 ~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA [II1II""" The Chairman called the Meeting to order at 4:10 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Webster and Wein Agency Members Absent: Wilson Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 22, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the Minutes of May 22, 1969 as submitted. The Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson REPORT, DELMANN HEIGHTS PROGRAM E-5: ",..-.. Mayor A1 Ballard was welcomed to the Meeting. Mr. Gary Van Osde1, Director of the De1mann Heights Program, submitted to the Members a written progress report outlining his Case Load, both dwelling and business; Available Funds; Projected Applications; and Remaining Cases. The report was discussed in detail and the duties of his office were explained. The prime concern of all was the continued vandalism of vacant homes in the project area. The vacancy factor has decreased somewhat since the inception of the project, but because of the vandalism the selling market is slow Mr. Van Osde1 explained that the homeowners have organized a youth police facility in the area, but unless the area is patrolled 24 hrs a day the vandalism will con- trenue. The hiring of a private police patrol was suggested by Mr. Austin. Mr. Wein felt that a meeting should be scheduled between the Agency, E-5 Staff, VA, FHA, private financing agencies, and concerned community people, for the resolution of this problem. The Members discussed the responsibility of the Agency regarding E-5 program. Mr. Varner explained that we are responsible for the administration of the program. Mr. Wein stated that by administering the program, we also will be charged with the success or failure of it. All Members agreed that the vandalism must be stopped if the program is to be a success, and instructed Mr. Quinn~and Mr. Van Osde1 to meet and discuss the problem in length to determine a solution. ....... REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: r:: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. 1072 OFFER TO PURCHASE, REUSE 4, R-10 and REUSE 2b, R-79: Mr. Austin explained that the Agency has received two Offers to Purchase on this property, and it is our duty to determine which development is best for the City of San Bernardino ..... ......... 4:35 - Mr. Wilson arrived at the meeting. Mr. Hyman Shane was presented to the Members to discuss his development of the property. Mr. Shane stated that he proposes to develop a two story professional office building, with approximately 10,000 sq. ft. The rendering and plot p1a~ were shown. With the land, the development value is approximately $275,000. Mr. Shane stated that he was not aware that another proposal had been submitted for this property until today. Mr. Wein requested that in the future, any developer submitting a proposal, should be apprized in writing, if another proposal has been submitted on the same parcel. Mr. Quinn stated that this would be done. Mr. William Winstead was then presented to the Members to discuss his proposed development of the parcels. Mr. Winstead stated that he originally proposed a two story office building on Reuse Parcels 2 & 3, R-10, which is now in escrow. He now desires to increase the size of this proposed office building, to a four story building; and therefore, desires to purchase Reuse 4, R-10 and Reuse 2b, R-79 for the required additional parking. The original proposal was for a 18,000 sq. ft. building; the four story building will increase the square footage to 36,000 sq. ft. The estimated value for the four story building is $1,300,000. The rendering and plot plan were shown. The Agency has an eminent domain action filed on Reuse 2b, R-79, and will not be able to deliver clear title to this property until approximately the end of September or first of October. This would not delay the Winstead development, if accepted, because tha~ particular parcel would be designated for the parking lot. Mr. Wein stated that if we accept the proposal of Messrs Shane, the Winstead de- velopment on Reuse 2 & 3 would have to remain a two story building, due to lack of adequate parking. As such, both developments would have an estimated value of less than $1,000,000. Whereby, if the proposal of Messrs Winstead was accepted, the estimated value would be over $1,300,000. ..... J1 ij m ..... After further discussion, the Members expressed their appreciation to Mr. Shane for his proposal but stated that the proposal of the Winsteads was best for the interest of San Bernardino. If possible, they would like to work with Mr. Shane for the purchase of another parcel. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1043 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT WILLIAM P. WINSTEAD, JR. AND JEROME T. WINSTEAD, ARE REDEVELOPERS WHO ARE QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-10, REUSE PARCEL 4 AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER IS STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ..... .....", -1---.. 1073 [ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Age~cy of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelop- ment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcel No.4 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1 Chapter 4, Sec. 2; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering; and WHEREAS, the offer of the subject parcel is contingent upon the acceptance of the Redevelopment Agency of the offer on Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79, Reuse Parcel 2b; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its intention to sell Reuse Parcel No.4 to William P. Winstead Jr. & Jerome T. Winstead, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said Parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing, Said Public Hearing to be held the 19th day of June, 1969. ~"~ Adopted: 6-5-69 "-- Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1043. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 1044 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT WILLIAM P. WINSTEAD, JR. and JEROME T. WINSTEAD, ARE THE MOST QUALIFIED REDEVEL- OPERS TO REDEVELOP CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-79, REUSE PARCEL 2b, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDE- VELOPERS STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79, to qualified Redevelopers; and WHEREAS, said parcels were duly advertised for sale in the San Bernardino Sun on April 25, 1969 and May 1, 1969; and [ WHEREAS, the Agency has offered certain parcels of land for sale under the fixed price competition method setting forth criteria by which proposals to redevelop the offered parcel would be evaluated; said offering was advertised in the San Bernardino Sun on April 25, 1969 and May 1, 1969; and 1074 WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering; and ~ WHEREAS, the offer of the subject parcel is contingent upon the acceptance of the Redevelopment Agency of the offer of Meadowbrook Project No.1, Calif. R-10, Reuse Parcel 4, -..tI NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, has determined that the proposal of William P. Winstead Jr. and Jerome T. Winstead, subject to approval by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment, is in the best interest of the Central City Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeve1oper's Statement for Public Disc1osure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held the 19th day of June, 1969 Adopted: 6-5-69 :,...-. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 1044. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ESTENSION OF ESCROW, REUSE PARCEL 33, R-10, SHANE: Mr. Hyman Shane requested a 60 day extension of his escrow on Reuse Parcel 33, R-10, in order that his tenant, Texaco, can give their final approval. The Members determined that such a request was proper, in that Texaco's main office is in New York and approval must go through channels to New York and back. The fo110w~ ing resolution was introduced: .... ...... RESOLUTION NO. 1045 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF ESCROW FOR REUSE PARCEL 33, R-10, UNTIL AUGUST 1, 1969 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 883, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 33, Calif. R-10, to George and Hyman Shane; and WHEREAS, escrow was opened for 60 days, the 12th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1019, adopted May 1,1969 extended the closing date of the escrow to no later than June 1, 1969; and WHEREAS, a request has been submitted for a further extension of 60 days, awaiting final approval from the tenant; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have de- termined that such a request is proper. ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the extension of escrow on Reuse Parcel 33, R-10, is hereby approved to no later than August 1, 1969 -..tI Adopted: 6-5-69 1075 ".... L Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1045. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AWARD OF CONTRACT, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.2, R-79: Mr. Austin stated that bids for the construction of the public mall, Site Pre- paration Unit No.2, were opened June 2, 1969. The low bid was received from J. D. Diffenbaugh in the amount of $2,720,871. Mr. Diffenbaugh was presented to the Board. Mr. Wilson stated that he is pleased that Diffenbaugh was the low bidder because of the fine work that they do. He further stated that he has heard that Western State Stone Company might be a subcontractor for this job. Western State Stone has not signed a union contract. Mr. Diffenbaugh assured Mr. Wilson that he,; would not use the firm of Western State Stone as a subcontractor if they did not sign a union contract, but they might be used as a supplier only. However, if necessary, he would request authority from the architect to use a similar material rather than that supplied by Western State. Mr. Diffenbaugh further stated that he would make every effort possible to move the construction rapidly. The Contract completion date is one calendar year from execution. ~- The following resolution was introduced: L-- RESOLUTION NO. 1046 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH J. D. DIFFENBAUGH FOR SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.2, PUBLIC MALL CONSTRUCTION, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency -is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Site Preparation, Unit No.2, for the Construction of the Central City Public Mall, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and r- !~ WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on May 1, 8, 15 and 22, 1969, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and .... WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m., on the 2nd day of June, 1969, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and 1076 WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by J. D. Diffenbaugh in the amount of $2,720,871; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said J. D. Diffenbaugh is qualified to be awarded the Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid. ..., ....... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of J. D. Diffenbaugh for the sum of $2,720,871, is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Site Preparation, Unit No.2, Mall Con- struction, Calif. R-79, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 1046. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DEMOLITION, BLOCK 22, PARCEL 3, CHANGE ORDER NO.4, DAKENO, UNIT NO. 23: Authority was requested to increase the services of Dakeno, Inc. on Unit No. 23, to include Block 22, Parcel 3. Mr. Wein was concerned with the slow procedure in demolishing the Montgomery Ward Building. He believed that there is entirely too much time spent on this building. It is bad for public relations to see this --. building coming down so slowly. Mr. Dakeno stated that he has been pulled off this building many times and instructed to demolish another building fir~. Mr. ~ Wein calculated that 81 days have been spent on the Ward building. After further discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein instructing the Executive Director to submit this parcel to bid. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EMINENT DOMAIN ACTIONS, R-79: Authority was requested to adopt resolutions of eminent domain on all remaining parcels east of IIEII Street. This does not necessarily mean that we will initia~e action on all parties, but that if settlement cannot be made, Mr. Quinn will already have the authority to so act. The following resolutions were introduced: ....... - [ ,..- i i \...- [ .. ,""'l--- -_ ~ i i t RESOLUTION NO. 1047 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPrlliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF S&~ BERNARDINO~ CALIFORNIA) AUTHORIZING THE CONDEHNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Bessie Del Taro, C. A. Love, Leslie F. Love and R. C. Ringholtz) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino) California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1) in the City of San Bernardino) California)pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24) 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649) and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vaca~ion and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening) stre~t installation or other street improvements) re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLV~D thab Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr.) be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California) in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.and the Community Development Law of the State.of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1) Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino) County of San Bern~rdino, State of California, and is designated as Block2, Parcels 2 and 3 being more particularly described in the title searcbes furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Ad.opted{ 6~5...,69. "~,_..._--+--- --~--~---~-----,,- 1078 RESOLUTION NO. J 048 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~ffiNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFOfu~IA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (James K. Barnum and Harold Barnum) .'.. _,.I BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follmvs: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No. I, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. ., .~ -J BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that-Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter ~.v. Quinn, Jr'., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino. in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Lmv of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Berna~dino, State of California, and is designated as Block 2, Parcel 4 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Ad~pted: 6-5-69 .... ....J ,.... I-. ""''' ... """-- ,.... ....., 1079 RESOLUTXON NO. 1049 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDENNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PEO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Barnum & Flagg, a corporation) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follmvs: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California,pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, stre~t installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its ExecutIve Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of . . San Bernar9ino, State of California, and is designated as Block 2, Parcel 5 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6~5~69 1080 . RESOLUTION NO. 1 n~o RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDE~mATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Amy D. Phillips) ..... ....... BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance vJith said Redevelopment Plan and in Qrder to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that.Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., pe and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino'in the name of this Ag~ncy, 'for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development LmV' of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. \.. ' , .,. . .. -.. - .. . , .... .... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within theboundari~s of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 2, :::-Parcels 7,8, 9, 10. and 11 being more particularly described ~n the title searches furnished by First American Title Company pow on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6 ""S...,fi9 ~ - "...... '-- fII"""'''''IIfI "'"'-- ",.. i ~ ! .-..... 1081 RESOLUTION NO. lOSl RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDE~mATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (~1ary B. Winstead, William Winstead~ William P. Winstead & Jerome Winstead) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Cornmon Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino. in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Berna~dino, State of California, and is designated as Block 2, Parcel 14 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adppted: 6-5-69 1082 RESOLUTION NO. 1052 .., RESOLUTION OF 1~E REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUIBORIZING THE CONDE~rnATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Earnest and Althea Martin) .... BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plcn, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. ..... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tha~ Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. .......I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bern?~dino, State of California, and is designated as Block 2, Parcels 16,17,18 and 19 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 ~ -- ",- ""'-' IIIIi"""'" 100..- ,... l [ ..... 1083. RESOLUTION NO. 1053 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFOfu~IA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDE~mATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO. 1,CALIF. R-79 (City of San Bernardino) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California,pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino. in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Berna~dino, State of California, and is designated as Block2, Parcels 20, 21 and 22 being more particularly described . in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 _._^;.~."_._-'"-_."+~._------~- 1084 RESOLUTION NO. 1054 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 ( Kathryn Brazil) eO' .", .,,"'; BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Cornmon Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the :preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said :Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus 'acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. "IIII! ~BE ,IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen :B. ,Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., ;be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain ~proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, ;~n a~d for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this ;Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this :Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil ~rocedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. -"" :BE -IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is lo'cared within :theboundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project 2No. 'Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 2, ~ - ' Parcel 28 being more particularly described rin the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 ...... -...i ,.... l- r I..- [ ., r.n ,- ....~:. .) RESOLUTION NO. J0!15 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELopr1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BEP!~ARDINO, CALI FORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEr1iIATI 0'1 OF CERTAIN PJ\RCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. I, CALIF. R-79, ( Block 21. Parcel 1. Kwock Company). BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of theCity of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follO\'Js: To develoD the area knOl.,rn as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear porti ons of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacati.on and abandonment of some interior street area and the demol- ition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance \'Jith said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the rea'l property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. (1resham and it's Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of C?liforn;a, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance \\lith the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Develooment La\.t of the State of Californi a for the uses and purposes sped fi ed above. ' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real nropertv is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No. I, Project flo. Calif. R-79, and in the City of SanSernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 21, Parcel 1. being more particularly described in the title searchs~; furntshed by Pirst American Title Company, now on file in the records of the Agency. .Adopted: 6-5-69 .. ~-------- ~086 RESOLUTI ON NO......! 056 _ lIIII~ RESOLUTIO~t OF THE REDEVElopr'1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SNl BERrgRDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CorlDHI~IATIO:'l OF CERTAI~1 PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. I, CALIF. R-79. ( Block 21, Parcel 4, r'1attheH J. Bogatin. et al. ) ..... BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the" public uses and purpoaes of the Redevelopment Agency of the Cit' of San Bernardino. California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develon the area knotln as Central City Project Area No.1. in the City of San Bernardino, California. pursuan t to the Rede'le 1 opment Pl an adopted by the Common Council of th e Ci ty of San Bernardino on February 24. 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demoliton or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street area and the de~ol- ition of other areas for street widening. street installation or other street fmprovements, re-narcel;zat;on of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preoaration of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopnent Plan, and to convey the real property thus aCfluired in accordance \'lith said Redevelopment Plan and in orde r to carry out the provi s ions of the Redeve 1 opmen t Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. !';resham and it's .., Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to ~ institute eminent domain proceedings ;n the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San nernardino in the name of thi s Agency. for the nuroose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance \.,ith the nrovisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Communitv Development lat.' of the State of Califomi a for the uses and purposes sped fi ed above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property ;s located \'Iithin the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No. I, Project No. Calif. R-79. and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 21, Parcel 4. being more particularly described in the title searchs furnished by Fir?t American Title Company, nov, .on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 ...... ..-I 1087 RESOlUTIml NO. 1057 ".... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~'ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERi/ARDINO. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZn:G THE CONDH~IATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS ()F REAL ~ PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO.1. CALIF. R-79. ( Block 21, Parcel 5, William L. Albertson and Blanche Albertson ). ,,-.. BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purooses of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. Said oublic uses and purnoses are as follm'/s: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area tlo. 1. in the City of San Bernardino, California. . pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adonted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649. and to clear portions of said area by aemo1ition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street area and the demol- ition of other areas for street widening. street installation or other street improvements. re-parcelization of the area. rough grading of the acquired land. installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan. and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance \.tith said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel. Allen B. Gresham and it's Executive Director. Peter H. Quinn. Jr.. be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California. in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency. for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. \- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No. I, Project No. .Calif. R-79. and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California. and is designated as Block 21, Parcel 5J being more particularly described in the title searchs furnished by ~;rst American Title Company. na~ on file in the records of the Agency. . Adopted: 6~5..,fi9 ...... -- 1088 RESOLUTION NO. 1058 -- ..... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP'1ENT AGnlCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNAROINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDP1NATION OF CERTAIN P^.RCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. I, CALIF. R-79, ( GlOCK 21. Parcel 9, W. B. Du Bose and Hattie L. Du Bose) , ......, BE IT RESOLVED t'1at the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public u~es and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area knO'!m as Central City Project Area No. I, in the City of San Bernardino, California. pursuant to the 'Redeve 1 opmcnt Pl an adopted by the Common Ccunei 1 of the City of San Bernardino on February 24. 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to cl~ar portions of said area by demoliton or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street area and the demol- ition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for the use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real 9roperty thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham and it's Executive Director. Peter H. Qu;nn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to ... institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of Californiil in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the pur~ose ..; of acquiring said property for thls Agency in accordance \'lith the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located vlithin the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No. I, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 21, Parcel 9, being more particularly described in the title searchs furnished by First American Title Comnany, na~ on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 ~ - . . ~. ~- - jII""- - ",.. f' '" k ...... 1089 RESOLUTION NO. 1059 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDE~mATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (William T. Winstead, William Perry Winstead, Jr., William Perry Winstead, Mary B. Winstead and Jerome T. . Winstead) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California,purs~ant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the .provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, . in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this : Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this : Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil . Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 21, Parcel 10 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 l'"\'J (\ \...J..... RESOLUTION NO. 1060 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFOfu~IA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Morris L. Shane, Tillie Shane, Hyman Shane, Dorothy Shane, George Shane and Annette Shane) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California,pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, .1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said ,Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus ~acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in ~order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. I ..' . . ~BE_ IT FURTHER RESOLVED tha~ Agency condemnation counsel, Allen ~B.' Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., :b~and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain lproceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, tin. .and for the County of San Bernardino- in the name of this :Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this (~gency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil ;Procedure and the Community Development La..v of the State of ~alifornia for the uses an~ purposes specified above. I.. _ ~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of ,San Berna~dino, State of California, and is designated as Block - .'. Parcel 11 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. AdopteD: 6-5-69 ..... ..... .. ...... 21 , ....... - ...-- """- "...- "-- r L.. - _.___ I 1091 RESOLUTION NO. 1 061 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Citizens National Company) BE IT- RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, _State of California, and is designated as Block 21, Parcels 12, 15, 16 and 18 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 1092 RESOLUTION NO. 1062 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPrlliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (6730 H. P. Corp.) ,."~ '."."'" BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment . Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Cornmon Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the ~reparation of bu~lding sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in ~rd~r to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. ...... . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain ~roceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency,' for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Ag~ncy in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of ~~l~fornia for the uses and purposes, specified above. > -..iJ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block21, ". - . 'Parcel 22 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company n~l on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 ...... ~ ....... ...- ",-. . -- ",.. ..... 1093 RESOLUTION NO. 1063 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPrlliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFO&~IA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDE~mATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Garner Properties) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parce1- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tha~ Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino. in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Berna~dino, State of California, and is designated as B1ock21, . Parcel 24 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Ad6~te.d; 6.",,5--159.- _.~ 1094 RESOLUTION NO. ]064 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDE~mATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Pearl N. t'lartin) ... .....; BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, ~installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the 'preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said :RedevelopmentPlan, and to convey the real property thus ~acquiredin accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in corder ,to carry ,out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. (-,: .. ~~ .' - .' '. - . .BE.IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen :B. :Gresham, and its Executive Director, PeterW. Quinn, Jr., !be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain ])roceedings .in the Superior Court of the State of California, ~inandfor the.County of .SanBernardino in the name of this :Agency ; for the purpose oE acquiring said property for this ~Agency .in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil :Procedure 'and the Community Development Law of the State of ~~~~i~~rnia .for the .uses and .purposes specified above. .BE.ITFURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within :the.boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project ,'No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of :San .Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 21, ::,. . Parcel 25 - . being more particularly described ~~n.thetitle searches furnished by First American Title Company -now on .file in the records of the Agency. ...... .....,.; Ad<?pted: 6-5-69 ..... -- 1095 '"- RESOLUTION NO. 1065 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~lliNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO:. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEHNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Ludowyn Ruggles and Almon Burton . Ruggles) ,.... f "....... BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California,pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Cornmon Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan:. and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. "'-- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that' Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79:. and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block2l, Parcel 13 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: 6-5-69 ,,- ....., -_.~-_.__.._.--l------ 1096 RESOLUTION NO. 1066 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~ffiNT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDE~lliATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1 CALIF. R-79 (William T. Winstead, Mary B. Winstead, William P. Winstead, Jr., Jerome T. Winstead and William P. Winstead) ~ -i i .....J BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public .. uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcel- ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in .... order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino. in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this ---Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. WIIIIfiI BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block21, Parcel 14 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. ..... Adopted; 6."5,,,,69 - 1097 ~ L Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving Resolutions 1047 through 1066. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PAYMENT OF UTILITY RELOCATION: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1067 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RETRO-ACTIVELY APPROVING THE AGENCY'S ACTIONS OF 9-24-68 AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION OF CABLE ON 4TH STREET TO ALLOW FOR PASSAGE OF SEWER LINES, AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREOF WHEREAS, due to passage of sewer lines, it.was necessary for the Agency to obtain the services of the Southern California Edison Company to relocate the cable on 4th Street approximately 150 feet West of "E" Street; and WHEREAS, said service has been completed by the Edison Company, and a bill in the amount of $2,535.93 has been submitted. ",- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby retro-actively approve the Agency's actions of 9-24-68, authorizing the relocation of said cable allowing for the passage of sewer lines. L BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the payment for said services to the Southern California Edison Company is hereby approved, for an amount not to exceed $2,535.93. Adopted: 6-5-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1067. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None FONTANA PAVING, UNIT NO.4, CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 R-79: Because of the flood damage it was necessary to have Fontana Paving repair certain areas. The following resolution was introduced: [ RESOLUTION NO. 1068 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 WITH FONTANA PAVING INC, SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving, Inc., for Site Preparation Unit No.4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and 1098 WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed on January 17, 1969; Change Order No.2 on February 7, 1969; Change Order No.3 on March 7, 1969; Change Order No.4 on ... April 18, 1969; Change Order No.5 on April 4, 1969; Change Order No.6 on v April 18, 1969; Change Order No.7 on April 24, 1969; Change Order No.8 on ~ May 2, 1969; Change Order No. 9 on May 23, 1969; and Change Order No. 10 on May 23, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase amount of Contract by $910.56 for emergency flood repair NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 11 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation No.4, Calif. R-79, increasing the contract compensation by an amount not to exceed $910.56 due to emergency flood repair. Adopted: 6-5-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein approving the adoption of Resolution No. 1068. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS Bank of America A letter was presented to the Members from Mr. Floyd T. Marker, of the Continental ,.. Service Company, advising the Board that they expect to start construction of the Bank of America building by August 1, 1969, with construction completed by .., October 13, 1970. Mr. Quinn was instructed to direct a letter to Mr. Marker stating that the Board publicly read his letter regarding construction date of Bank of America, and we are most anxious to see construction start on or before August 1, 1969. Ground Breaking Ceremony Mr. Austin stated that he would like for Mr. Quinn to arrange a Ground Breaking Ceremony for the start of Mall Construction. All Members agreed. Investment Report The Investment Report was presented to the Members. The Investments were discussed and distribution explained. Code Enforcement Program Mr. Webster asked Mr. Varner to further explain the Agency's responsibilities regarding the Delmann Heights E-5 program. Mr. Varner stated that the Agency has been contracted to administer the project, and in so doing we are responsible for the success or failure of it. After further discussion regarding the vandalism in the project area, all Members desired that a letter be drawn, directed to the City Council, forwarding a Formal Report of the Project. The letter should set forth the Agency's concern regarding the vandalism and state that the Agency welcomes any suggestion the Council can give regarding resolution. ..... ........ 1099 [ Purchase of Renderings, R-79 Mr. Quinn requested authorization to purchase 15 more sets of the renderings of the Central City Model. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1069 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN $1,050 FOR THE PURCHASE OF 15 SETS OF RENDERINGS OF THE CENTRAL CITY MALL MODEL WHEREAS, It is the desire of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, to purchase 15 additional sets of colored renderings of the Central City Mall Model for promotional data. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino,Ca1ifornia, that the expenditure of not more than $1,050 is hereby approved for the purchase of 15 additional sets of renderings of the Central City Mall Model. Adopted: 6-5-69 ,.,~,,"'llIII Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1069. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ---- ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein adjourning the meeting at 6:00 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,... ..... . ... -. - -- ------ +- ----.---- --- 11 00 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ~ - The Meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following. Agency Members Present: Austin, Webster, Wein and Wilson Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and ~1rs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 5, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of June ~~ 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: W'lson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of May, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Expenditures for the month of May, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .... --:J REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time, but will answer any questions. Mr. Varner was asked to report on the status of the Masonic Building condemnation action. He stated that the Masonic Building is trailing, and the case should be brought to court soon. Mr. Wilson asked about the status of the Railroad right-of-way, which runs through various parcels in the Meadowbrook Project. Mr. Quinn stated that we have a condemnation action filed regarding this right-of-way. We are presently working with HUD to get a concurrance on this property. The Railroad Company themselves are not working to rapidly on the matter. Mr. Wilson stated that he would like to know if there is anything the Agency Board can do to speed up this action. Mr. Varner stated that he would speak to Mr. Gresham, condemnation counsel, and then report to the Board the reason for the holdup in this matter. Condemnation action is filed on the Western Union property. Trial date is set for August. They will be out of the property the end of July, in order that the Agency may meet their time table. ..... - '1"1 v. ".... HARTFORDt CONNECTICUTt TRIP: l I '-- Mr. Varner reported on his and Mr. Quinn's trip to Hartfordt Connecticutt June 11 and 12t 1969. The reason for the trip was to meet with representatives from John S. Griffith and Connecticut General regarding financing of the Griffith/Curci- Turner Disposition Agreement. Escrow is to close 120 days after the Agency gives Griffith/Curci-Turner Company notice that the property may be delivered. Mr. Varner stated that the close of escrow and the start of construction will virtually be simultaneous. Their presentation to Connecticut General was very well receivedt and they left with the understanding that Connecticut General will go along with the financing for Griffith/Curci-Turner. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1070 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEV.ELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOt CALIFORNIAt RETROACTIVELY AUTHORIZING THE SEC- RETARY AND AGENCY COUNSEL TO TRAVEL TO HARTFORDt CONN.t JUNE 11 & 12 t 1969 -- WHEREASt Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dinot Ca1iforniat requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREASt it was found essential that the Secretary and Agency Counsel travel to Hartfordt Conn.t June 11 and 12t and meet with Uohn S. Griffith Co.t re- garding pending disposition of R-79 properties. 1""""'" NOWt THEREFOREt BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardinot Ca1iforniat that the Agency does hereby retroactively approve of the Secretary and Agency Counsel traveling to Hartfordt Conn.t June 11 & 12t 1969t to discuss pending disposition of R-79 properties. Adopted: 6/19/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1070. The motion was carried by the following votet to wit: Ayes: Webstert Wi1sont Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Wein requested the status of the Harris Company. Mr. Quinn explained that Harris Company has indicated that they will be in a position to let contract for bids by the end of this year. The preliminary plan should be ready in about 90 days. January 15t 1970 is their goal for start of construction. Mr. Quinn further stated that we have a condemnation action filed on the Rose parcel. He has been served and an answer should be forthcoming. r- ! 1 ~ AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR INSPECTION SERVICES AND TESTING SERVICES FOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF THE CENTRAL CITY ~1ALL: The Members were presented with proposals for the inspection services and pro- posals for the testing services for the construction of the mall. All but one 1102 firm submitted separate proposals, either for inspection or testing. San Bernardino Testing & Inspection Company submitted a proposal for the combined services. The letter inviting proposals asked for separate proposals. Mr. Wilson requested that the matter be tabled in order that they may have time to properly review and study the proposals. Mr. Quinn apologized for not having the proposals ready for submission earlier, but explained that they had just come in. He further explained that Diffenbaugh, construction contractor for the mall, will commence his preliminary work next week, and the Agency should have, at that time, a contracted Inspector and Testor. ~ ...." Mr. Austin stated that these are proposals for professional services and the Agency does not have to accept the low proposal, but must decide which firm is the most deserving and to the best interest of the City and the Project. Three firms were present at the meeting. Mr. Kenneth Kienow, from San Bernardino Testing & Inspection Company, was pre- sented to the Board. He stated that it is their belief that one organization doing both the testing and inspecting would be to the advantage of the Agency. They would have a testing lab on the site, and an engineer on the job full time. Mr. Robert MacKay, from Western Consultants, was then presented. Mr. MacKay stated he has submitted a proposal for the inspection services only. Their job would really be one of construction coordination. They would be concerned with the esthetics of the project. They would supervise the testing and evaluate the progress of the job. Their firm is from Los Angeles, but they would have a San Bernardino resident construction coordinator on the job. .... , ..." Mr. J. L. Riddell from CHJ Laboratories was presented. Mr. Riddell stated that they are familiar with the project, in that they have done various work on the project in the past. Their office is near the project area, and they would be available at all times. He further stated that his proposal is for the testing services, but if the Board desires a combined proposal, he would appreciate the opportunity to be able to submit one. Mr. Desrochers, Operations Officer, stated that CHJ did ask if they might submit a combined proposal, but he informed them not to, in that Victor Gruen Associates, recommended that the services be separated in order to prevent possible conflicts of interest. Mr. Desrochers further stated that he also advised San Bernardino Testing & Inspection to submit separate proposals, but they stated that they wished to submit one for combined services. Mr. We;n stated that he believed separate proposals would be best, in that he could see where conflict of interest might arise. The Members asked Mr. Varner if a bond or Errors and Omission Insurance could be provided the Agency for a contract of this type. Mr. Varner stated that our Contract could reflect that an Errors and Omissions Insurance must be furnished the Agency. After further discussion, Mr. Wilson moved that the Agency accept the proposal of San Bernardino Testing & Inspection Company, for the combined services of inspection and testing, and that the contract shall provide that the Agency be furnished with Errors and Omissions Insurance. The motion died for lack of second. .., .,...Jj 1103 r- L Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster to table the matter until the next regular meeting, and call for new proposals. The motion was denied by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein and Webster Noes: Wilson and Austin Abstention: None Absent: None The Members discussed the importance of execution of this contract/contracts, in that Diffenbaugh will be commencing his preliminary work next week. A Special Meeting was discussed. Mr. Wilson again moved that the Agency accept the proposal of San Bernardino Testing & Inspection Company for the combined services of inspection and testing and that the contract shall provide that the Agency be furnished with Errors and Omissions Insurance. Mr. Austin asked Mr. Webster to assume the Chairmanship in order that he may be able to second Mr. Wilson's motion. Mr. Webster assumed the Chair~ Mr. Austin seconded Mr. Wi1son1s motion to accept the proposal of San Bernardino Testing & Inspection Company. The motion was denied by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson and Austin Noes: Webster and Wein Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Austin reassumed the Chairmanship. "".... f<1r. Wilson stated that he would be available for a Special Meeting, Thursday, the 26th day of June. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster to postpone the matter of award of contract/contracts for Inspection services and Testing services until June 26, 1969, at a Special Meeting. The motion further stated that all firms be notified that they may either submit a joint proposal for both testing and inspection, leave their proposal as is, or resubmit their pro- posals with maximum fees for their services. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ""- Mr. Quinn was instructed to schedule said SpeciAl Meeting. C & J ENTERPRISES, R-10, REUSE PARCEL 88: A request was presented for an extension of time to commence construction, R-10, Reuse Parcel 88, from C & J Enterprises. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1071 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION ON REUSE PARCEL 88, R-10, TO NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 6, 1969 ~ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 653 authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel 88, Calif. R-10 to C AND J ENTER- PRISES: and -- 1104 WHEREAS, the Agreement entered into on April 16, 1968, by and between the Redevelopment Agency and C and J Enterprises called for an excrow of 30 days duration and construction to commence within 12 months from the date of conveyance of said Reuse Parcel; and ..... ..." WHEREAS, the escrow closed on June 6, 1968 thereby setting the date of cons- truction to no later than June 6, 1969; and WHEREAS, C and J Enterprises has made exhaustive unsuccessful attempts to locate a tenant for their improvement to be constructed on the subject pro- perty, and WHEREAS, C and J Enterprises has requested an additional 90 days to locate a suitable tenant and commence construction; and WHEREAS, C and J Enterprises has offered, should their attempts to obtain a suitable tenant in the 90 day extension period be unsuccessful, to sell said Reuse Parcel 88 back to the Agency at their purchase price of $17,000; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that the request is necessary and in the best interest of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the extension of time to commence construction of Reuse Parcel 88, Calif. R-10 is hereby approved to no later than September 6, 1969 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should said C and J Enterprises fail to commence construction by September 6, 1969 that the Agency will purchase said parcel from Redeveloper at a purchase price of $17,000. .... ..... Adopted: 6/19/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1071. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None HENRY S. HENSCHEL R-10 REUSE PARCELS 23 THROUGH 32: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1072 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT TO APPROPRIATE AND ALLOCATE MORTGAGE FUNDS TO HENRY S. HENSCHEL, ET AL, DEVELOPERS OF MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, R-10, REUSE PARCELS 23 THROUGH 32 UNDER FHA PROGRAMS 22ld3 AND 236 ... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino and Henry S. ..... 1105 ,.... ~. ? '-- Henschel, Robert J. Erwin and M. H. Golden Construction Company have entered into an Agreement for the disposal and redevelopment of Meadowbrook Reuse Parcels 23 through 32; and WHEREAS, said redevelopment is to be accomplished through the use of mortgage financing made available for Sections 221d3 and 236 of the National Housing Act; and WHEREAS, it is the firm belief of the Agency that the Development proposed by Mr. Henschel, et a1, is necessary to accomplish the stated housing goals of the Federal Government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency urges the Congress of the United States of America and the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment to pass, allocate and fund the necessary funds to complete the redevelop- ment of these parcels at the earliest possible moment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Director is directed to mail copies of this Resolution to Senator Allen Cranston, Senator George Murphy, Congress- men Richard Hanna, Jerry Pettis and John Tunney. Adopted: 6/19/69 ,..... , ; : L.... Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1072. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASE, R-10, REUSE PARCEL 82, WALTER R. DU BOSE: An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel 82, R-10, was presented from Walter R. DuBose. The rendering and plot plan were shown, for a 14,000 sq. ft. office building. No finders fee is claimed on this proposal. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1073 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT WALTER R. DUBOSE A REDEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-10, REUSE PARCEL NO. 82 AND AUTHO- RIZING PUBLICATION OF THE IIREDEVELOPER I S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE II AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING r L.. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcel No. 82 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2; and 1106 WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its intention to sell Reuse Parcel No. 82 to Walter R. DuBose, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. ...... - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said parcel to said rede- veloper is in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project and the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the IlRedeveloper1s Statement for Public Disc10surell and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held the 3rd day of July, 1969. Adopted: 6/19/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1073. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Web~ter and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent; None CHANGE ORDER NO.3, GRIGGS-NORWOOD CONTRACT, R-79: A request for execution of Change Order No. 3 to contract with Griggs-Norwood Unit No.3, Phase II, Calif. R-79 was presented. The change was explained to the Members. All members felt that said Change Order was warranted. The following resolution was introduced: .... .... RESOLUTION NO. 1074 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO.3 WITH GRIGGS-NORWOOD INC., UNIT NO. 3, PHASE II, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Griggs-Norwood, Inc., for the Site Preparation Unit No.3, Phase II, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed the 21st day of February, 1969 and Change Order No.2 was executed on the 23rd day of May, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Con- tractor as shall be set forth in Change Order No.3. Said increase shall not exceed the sum of $4,630.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No.3 to contract with Griggs-Norwood Inc., Unit No.3, Phase II, Calif. R-79, not to exceed the sum of $4,630.00. ~ - Adopted: 6/19/69 1107 "... L Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1074. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: The Chairman declared that this is the time and place for the public hearing on the sale of Reuse Parcel 2b, Calif. R-79, to William P. Winstead Jr., and Jerome Taylor Winstead. The documents are available in the office of the Agency for inspection. There being no objections to said sale the Public Hearing for Reuse Parcel 2 b, Calif. R-79 was closed. The Chairman declared that this is the time and place for the public hearing on the sale of Reuse Parcel 4, Calif. R-10, to William P. Winstead Jr. and Jerome Taylor Winstead. The documents are available in the office of the Agency for inspection. There being no objections to said sale the Public Hearing for Reuse Parcel 4, Calif. R-10 was closed. DISPOSAL OF LAND, R-10 and R-79: The following resolutions were introduced: [ RESOLUTION NO. 1075 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO. 2b, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1 TO WILLIAM P. WINSTEAD, JR., AND JEROME TAYLOR WINSTEAD WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcel No. 2b to William P. Winstead, Jr. and Jerome Taylor Winstead by Resolution No. 1044; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel ,to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held on June 19,1969 in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined that it has no objection to sale of said parcel to said Redeveloper. ,.... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement for the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 2b, Central City Project No.1 to William P. Winstead, Jr. and Jerome Taylor Winstead. ..... Adopted: 6/19/69 1108 RESOLUTION NO. 1076 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO.4, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT NO.1, TO WILLIAM P. WINSTEAD, JR. AND JEROME TAYLOR WINSTEAD. .... ....J WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcel No.4 to William P. Winstead, Jr. and Jerome Taylor Winstead by Resolution No. 1043; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held on June 19, 1969 in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined that it has no objection to sale of said parcel to said Redeveloper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement for the sale of Reuse Parcel No.4, Meadowbrook Project No.1, to William P. Winstead, Jr. and Jerome Taylor Winstead. ..... ..J Adopted: 6/19/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolutions No. 1075 and 1076. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DELMANN HEIGHTS, E-5, REPORT: t4r. Gary Van Osde1, t1anager of the Delma,nn Heights Program, was presented to the Members. Mr. Van Osde1 stated a meeting is scheduled Monday afternoon with leaders of the area to discuss a method of disposing of the vandalism at Delmann Heights. He further stated that he contacted VA and FHA officials to see if they could participate in the financing of a patrol in the project to stop the vandalism. He was informed that perhaps they could if a written proposal was submitted to their head office, with a suggested means of resolving the problem. Mr. Wilson sated that vandalism of this type is happening allover the country, and is not unique to San Bernardino Delmann Heights alone, and therefore, we should not be too critical of the management and carrying out of this project. He further stated that we must try our best to resolve the problem, and in his opinion the best means of solution must come from within the project itself. All Members agreed that a resolution must be made by the citizens of De1mann Heights, for without their help the Agency cannot solve the problem. .... ....... 11 09 ,..... STATEMENT FOR TOOLS, ELMER COLE: L A statement for tools, broken and rental of tools was presented to the Members as submitted by Elmer Cole, former Maintenance Mechanic for the Agency. Mr. Quinn stated that there was no commitment on the part of the Agency to rent the tools from Mr. Cole. His broken tools were replaced by the Agency. Mr. Varner stated that it is his opinion that the statement has no merit. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster denying the claim of Elmer Cole. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT FOR JANITOR SERVICE, R-79: Mr. Quinn stated that three tenants are remalnlng in the Katz Building located at 315 North "E" Street, Calif. R-79. Until these tenants are relocated it is the desire of the Agency to enter into contract with Harris Building and r'1ain- tenance for Janitorial Service for this Building. Harris Building and Maintenance were the contracted janitorial serVlce for the building at the time the Agency took possession. The following resolution was introduced: ",.- RESOLUTION NO. 1.077 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CONTRACT WITH HARRIS BUILDING AND MAINTENANCE \0..... WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21,1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency has acquired the property known as the Katz Building, located at 315 North "E" Street, in said Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of Harris Building and Mainte- nance for the purpose of Janitor Service to be performed at said Katz Building, beginning the 2nd day of June, 1969 and ending when there are no occupants remaining on the second, third, and fourth floor of the building, for the sum of $100.00 per month. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute contract with Harris Building and Maintenance for janitor services for the Katz Building for the sum of $100.00 per month. ".... Adopted: 6/19/69 --- 1110 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1077. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,...... ...." FONTANA PAVING, CHANGE ORDER NO. 12, UNIT NO.4, R-79: A deletion of $2,060.98 from the contract price to Fontana Paving was requested. This deletion is for the deletion of the interconnect conduit to the City Hall. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1078 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 WITH FONTANA PAVING, INC., SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving Inc., for Site Preparation Unit No. 4, Calif. R-79, dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No.1 was executed on January 17, 1969; Change Order No. 2 on February 7, 1969; Change Order No.3 on March 7, 1969; Change Order No.4 on April 18, 1969; Change Order No.5 on April 4, 1969; Change Order No.6 on April 18, 1969; Change Order No.7 on April 24, 1969; Change Order No.8 on May 2, 1969; Change Order No.9 on May 23, 1969; Change Order No. 10 on May 23, 1969; and Change Order No. 11 was authorized by Resolution No. 1068 adopted June 5, 1969; and ~ .... WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to delete from Fontana Paving's Contract the interconnect conduit to San Bernardino City Hall and install an interconnect overhead system to the City Hall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 12 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No. 4, Calif. R-79, deleting the interconnect conduit to San Bernardino City Hall, and decreasing their contract by $2,060.98. Adopted: 6/19/69 r'1otion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1077. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None APPRAISAL CONTRACT, REUSE PARCEL 62, R-10: Mr. Quinn requested authorization to enter into a contract to obtain appraisal for "E" Street Right-of-Way, R-10, Reuse Parcel 62. This appraisal is necessary .... - 1111 r I L inasmuch as the Agency has been unsuccessful in obtaining the necessary right- of-way for the widening of "E" Street from the owners of Reuse Parcel 62. All other owners have donated the right-of-way. Three proposals were received, as follows: 1 . A 1 Kno rr 2. Ray Hastings 3. Edward Hill $600 500 600 Delivery date - July 7, 1969 Delivery date - July 18, 1969 Delivery date - July 11,1969 Inasmuch as the need for this appraisal as soon as possible is necessary, the Members determined that Al Knorr should be awarded the contract. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1079 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH AL KNORR FOR APPRAISAL OF RIGHT-OF-WAY, R-10, REUSE PARCEL 62 --- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino in executing the Central City Redevelopment Plan has determined that the widening of "E" Street through the Meadowbrook Project area to Atho1 Street is necessary; and WHEREAS, the Agency has been successful in obtaining donations of the necessary right-of-way for said widening from all owners of property along "E" Street in the Meadowbrook Project area except the owners of Reuse Parcel 62, R-10; and WHEREAS, the Construction on the widening of "E" Street is imminent. Conse- quently, the necessary right-of-way is an immediate necessity. ",.-.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and Executive Director are hereby authorized to enter into a contract with A1 Knorr Appraiser for the necessary right-of-way appraisal; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the amount for said appraisal shall not exceed $600.00. Adopted: 6/19/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1079. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: ",.... Reappraisal of the Mall Parking Area, Civic Center Parking Area and TBA Areas Mr. Quinn stated that since the adoption of the original Redevelopment Plan, ...... 1112 substantial changes in the usage of the land in the Central City Project has occurred. The previous reuse values for the parking areas did not take into cons i dera ti on the 'concept of free parki ng . It is necessary to have the fvla 11 parking area, the Civic Center parking area and the T. B. A. Areas reappraised. HUD has recommended the use of David Ashton for this reappraisal service. The following resolution was introduced: ~ -J RESOLUTION NO. 1080 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH DAVID ASHTON FOR THE REAPPRAISAL OF THE MALL PARKING AREA, CIVIC CENTER PARKING AREA AND T. B. A. AREAS WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino is actively pursuing the completion of the Central City Project No.1, and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the original Redevelopment Plan, substantial changes in the usage of land in the Central City PRoject has changed, and WHEREAS, the reuse values previously set by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the parking areas surrounding the mall and in the Civic-Cultural Center area did not take into consideration the concept of free public parking; and ...... WHEREAS, the land necessary for the TBAs in the Northwest Quadrant of the Mall parking area was previously appraised for parking usage; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency requires that the aforesaid changes in concept reflect the need for appraisals of the property as now designed; and WHEREAS, Mr. David Ashton is a qualified Reuse Appraiser familiar with these new concepts; and -- WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, by letter dated June 16, 1969 has approved Mr. Ashton as the Reuse Appraiser for the subject parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and Executive Director are authorized to enter into a contract, not to exceed $1500 for the services of Mr. David Ashton for the appraisal of the mall parking area, the Civic- Cultural Center parking area and the TBA area. Delivery of the appraisal report is to be no later than August 1,1969. Adopted: 6/19/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1080. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: none Absent: None ...... --- 1113 San Francisco Directors Conference ".... I...... The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1081 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO TRAVEL TO SAN FRANCISCO, JUNE 24, 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found essential that the Executive Director travel to San Francisco to attend a conference of California Redevelopment Directors to be held June 24, 1969 at the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby authorize the Executive Director to travel to San Francisco to attend the conference of California Redevelopment Directors, June 24, 1969, and his travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 302. I/!If!"'''''' Adopted: 6/19/69 -- Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1081. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None' Ground Breaking Ceremony Mr. Quinn asked the Members if they have any names they would like to add to the list the Agency will be sending invitations to for the ground breaking ceremony. The Members indicated that they would like invitations sent to the original board of the Agency. Mr. Quinn stated that this would be done. ADJOURN~lENT : ~lotion was made by Webster and seconded by ~Ji1son to adjourn the meeting at 5:55 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,....... ........ 1114 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ...... - The Meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency fvlembers Present: Wein, Vlebster, Wilson and Austin Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary The Chairman reported that this Special Meeting was called pursuant to a duly served Notice of Special Meeting sent to each Member. Said Notice is as fo 11 ows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at the office of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 Court Street, Room 305, in the City of San Bernardino, the regular meeting place thereof, at 4:00 p.m., the 26th day of June, 1969, for the purpose of awarding Contract/Contracts for Inspection Services and Testing Services for the Construc- tion of the Central City Mall. Dated this 23rd day of June, 1969. ..... - sIP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director Secretary-Treasurer 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 23rd day of June, 1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special M~eting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner; BY UNITED STATES MAIL Witness my hand this 23 rd day of June, 1969. sIP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director Secretary-Treasurer ..... ..... 1115 ,... INSPECTION AND TESTING SERVICES, R-79: L... The Chairman stated that all ~lembers have been supplied with copies of the pro- posals submitted. Representatives from all firms submitting proposals were present. Presentations were given as follows: San Bernardino Inspection and Testing: Stated that they have not changed their original proposal. They do feel that the Agency will have better control over a joint contract of Inspection and Testing, as they propose to furnish. They further stated that the City Engineer has indicated to them that he would prefer a contract for the combined services. fIII"""'o CHJ Materials Laboratory: Stated that they have submitted two proposals -- one for the combined services and the other for the testing alone. Pacific Laboratory: Stated that they too have submitted two proposals -- one for the combined services and the other for the testing only. Further stated that they have complete testing facilities in their lab. Krueper Engineering: Stated that they are interested in the inspection work only. He further stated that it is his opinion that separate contracts would be best. This method provides a system of checks and balances. Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy: Stated that they have submitted a proposal for the inspection servi ces only. They have done work for the Highway Department and are familiar with both the use of separate contracts and combined contracts. - Bonadiman and Associates: Stated that they have submitted a proposal for the inspection services only. Further stated that they feel that better work is supplied if it is specialized. Western Consultants: Stated that their proposal is for the Inspection, or construction coordination services. They have done work under Victor Gruen in the past. Further stated that in his proposal he suggested that a representative from Victor Gruen be present to assist the Board in evaluating the proposals. Mr. Austin stated that he was aware of Western Consultants suggestion, but did not feel that it was necessary. Mr. Wilson asked Mr. Varner if it would weaken the Agency's liability to have two separate contracts. Mr. Varner stated that he could see no legal problem as far as either method was concerned. Possible conflict of interest was discussed regarding the combined services. r'lr. Austin stated that Mr. Quinn had the opportunity, since our Regular rvleeting of June 19th, to speak to HUD Officials regarding their preference of separate or combined contracts. Mr. Quinn stated that they have no preference regarding the services. They have seen it work just as well both ways. The Members evaluated the methods of both the combined contract and separate contracts. After much consideration, motion was made by Wein that the Agency only consider those proposals for separate services. The motion was seconded by Webster. The motion was denied by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: ....... ......... 1116 Wein and Webster Noes: Wilson and Austin Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Austin stated that he voted No because he is not sure just yet which method would be the best for the Agency and City. Mr. Austin further stated that he is certain all firms are well qualified to perform the services. His concern was with the best method. He then asked all firms which method has been used the most, in their experience. Upon polling all firms, the separate contract method was used the most. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster that the Agency only consider those proposals for separate services. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: Wilson Abstention: None Absent: None ..... .... Mr. Wein stated that in view of the presentations and proposals received, he believes that all firms are very qualified to perform the Inspection Services, and on this basis he believes that the contract should be awarded to the low proposal of Krueper Engineering, for the maximum sum of $27,208. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1082 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CENTRAL CITY r~ALL TO KRUEPER EN- GINEERING ...... WHEREAS, the Agency has, under da te of r~arch 21, 1967 entered. into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title 1 of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of a Contractor to render professional services in connection with building inspections for the construc- tion of the Central City Mall; and WHEREAS, a number of proposals were received by the Agency for said services; and ....... WHEREAS, the Members of said Agency have reviewed the proposals submitted, at their Regular Meeting of June 19, 1969, and have determined that the proposal of Krueper Engineering be accepted, in that said proposal appears to be in the best interest of the Agency and the City of San Bernardino. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute contract with Krueper Engineering for Inspection Services for the construction of the Central City Mall. Said contract not to exceed the sum of $27,208. Adopted: 6/26/69 IIIIIIIII ....... 1117 ..... Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1082. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None "",... On the same basis, the following resolution was introduced for the Testing Services: RESOLUTION NO. 1083 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOP~ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAn AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR TESTING SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CENTRAL CITY HALL TO CHJ ~1ATERIAL LABORATORIES ",..,. WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage a Contractor, to render certain profes- sional services in connection with testing services for the construction of the Central City Mall; and """- WHEREAS, proposals were received by the Agency for said services; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency have reviewed the proposals submitted, at their Regular Meeting of June 19, 1969, and have determined that the proposal of CHJ Material Laboratories be accepted, in that said proposal appears to be in the best interest of the Agency and the City of San Bernardino. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute contract with CHJ Material Laboratories for testing services for the construction of the Central City r'1all. Said contract not to exceed the sum of $27,208. Adopted: 6/26/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1083. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,... All firms expressed their appreciation fot the Agency's time and much concern that was given to their decision. Mr. Austin informed the Members that our advertising time in the Wall Street Journal has run out, and the Agency has not received any proposals for the land in the West End except from Griffith Co. Griffith Company is interested in t '- -I- . 1118 ',- " this land and desires to purchase it, but they will not start their plans unless they have some assurance that the Agency will not sell the land from under them while they are preparing their plans. Mr. Austin suggested that the Agency give Griffith a 60 day assurance period so that they can prepare thei r plans for submi ss i on. A $5,000 depos it was sugges ted. Mr. Wil son stated that he would be in favor of notifying Griffith and any other per- spective developers who might express a desire for the property, that all proposals will be reviewed and considered by the Agency, 60 days from a given date. No deposit would then be required. This would assure Griffith that we would not sell from under them, and also would not limit the Agency from considering any other proposals. All Members felt that this would be an advisable method. Mr. Quinn was instructed to place this item on the Agenda for the next Regular Meeting for formal action. ...... - ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 5:15 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ..... -- ..... - 1119 .... MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ..... The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:15 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency r~embers Present: \oJebster, Austin, Vlein and Wilson Agency Members Absent; None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary rvlINUTES: The ~1inutes of the Regular ~leeting of June 19, 1969 were presented to the f'lembers for approval. Mr. Wilson noted that on Page 8, the motion adopting Resolution No. 1081 was incomplete, in that all votes were not noted. All Members voted aye on the adoption of this Resolution. Mr. Quinn stated that the minutes would be so corrected. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 19, 1969 as corrected. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None "..- - The Minutes of the Special Meeting of June 26, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of the Special Meeting of June 26, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: The Members requested the status of the railroad property. Mr. Varner stated that Mr. Gresham, Condemnation Attorney, should have a full report for the Members at the next regular meeting. He further stated that the Agency has arranged with the railroad for Southern Pacific to accept service. We have forwarded a letter regarding the necessity of acquiring this property immediately. We will be pushing for as early a trial as possible. The r'Jasonic Building is set for trial 11 :45 a.m., July 7, 1969. Fifteen days is estimated for trial time. Settlement is the real issue involved, but the tenants are also pushing for a delay. f'1r. Wilson stated that he would like the Agency to do everything possible to acquire this property rapidly. And if a special meeting is necessary for any action, the Agency should be ready to call one. Mr. Varner assured Mr. Wilson that now that trial is set, the case can move as rapidly as can be expected. r-' OFFER TO PURCHASE, R-10, REUSE PARCELS 15, 16 and portion of 13b and 17, SOUTH- LAND NATIONAL BANK: ..... An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcels 15, 16 and portion of 13b and 17, SOUTHLAND 1120 NATIONAL BANK, R-10, was presented to the Members. This property is located at the northeast corner of 2nd and 11011 Streets. ~1r. Cecil Nays, representative from Southland National, explained his rendering and plot plan to the Members. They propose a five story structure, the first floor being the Southland National Bank. The remaining floors will be used for offices. Two major tenants have already designated space for two floors of the building, leaving two floors rema in i ng to be occup i ed. f'1r. Ivlays exp 1 a i ned to the ~1embers, tha t Southland National desires the right to refuse purchase of the property in the event the Comptroller of Currency does not authorize location of a branch bank on this property. The building will be approximately 50,000 sq. ft. and construction can start in 3 to 4 months. A 60 day escrow is desired. Mr. David D. Whitson is the real estate broker for this sale. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: ~ -- RESOLUTION NO. 1084 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK IS THE REDEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-10, REUSE PARCELS 15, 16 and portion of 13b and 17, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER'S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelop- ment Plan thereof; and ..... ........ WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcels 15, 16 and portion of 13b and 17 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its' intention to sell Reuse Parcels 15, 16 and portion of 13b~and 17 to Southland National Bank, subject to the concurrence of the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held the 17th day of July, 1969. Adopted: 7/3/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1084. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None IIIIIIIIlII ....... 1121 ",.... "'- r~r. Jack Bryant, real estate representative of Security Pacific Bank, was pre- sented to the Members. Mr. Austin explained to the Members that Security Pacific Bank is interested in the property directly across the street from the property to be purchased by Southland National Bank--the southwest corner of 3rd and "0".' Security Pacific is in our Central City Project and will have to be relocated in the near future. Mr. Austin stated that the Agency would like to keep them in the project area if possible, and the Board would do everything possible to find them a suitable location. Mr. Bryant explained that he is unable to submit an Offer to Purchase this property at this time. They are concerned as to whether the City could support another 3-5 story office building. The first floor being the bank, and the remainder to be rented as office space. The area which they desire for this building is now projected on our Master Plan to be used for a 12 story building. The property immediately contingent to this area is projected for a 4-5 story building. Mr. Austin asked Mr. Bryant if this parcel would be suitable for his needs. Mr. Bryant stated that he could not make any definite proposal or decision because he and his asso- ciates are still concerned as to whether they would be able to rent a building of this size. Mr. Austin assured Mr. Bryant that the Agency would work with him in finding a suitable location, and that we would very ,much like to see him develop property in our Central City Area. - PUBLJC HEARING, REUSE PARCEL 82, R-10, WALTER R. DU BOSE: Mr. Austin stated that this is the time and place so designated for the Public Hearing of the sale of Reuse Parcel 82, R-10, to Walter R. DuBose. No,finders fee is involved in this sale. The form of contract is available for examination by any interested party. There being no objection to the sale of said property, the Public Hearing was closed. "...- SALE OF REUSE PARCEL 82, R-10: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1085 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO. 82, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT NO. 1 TO WALTER DUBOSE I""""'l' WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcel No. 82 to Walter DuBose by Resolution No. 1073; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency.s intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held on July 3,1969 in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec. 4; and -..- , , "'" Lt. HHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined that it has no objection to sale of said parcel to said Redeveloper. flOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement for the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 82, Meadowbrook Project No.1, to Walter DuBose. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the escrow on Reuse Parcel 82, R-10 be closed within 60 days from the date of this resolution and construction commence within 60 days after the close of the escrow. Adopted: 6/3/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1085. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO.5, VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES, PARKING DESIGN: Mr. Austin requested authorization to enter into Contract Amendment No. 5 to contract for Parking Design, with Victor Gruen. This amendment would be for a temporary parking area to relieve a critical parking situation for appro- ximately 100,000 sq. ft. along 4th Street. Permanent parking is not contemplated since curbs, gutters, planting areas, light standards, under- ground electrical and irrigation have yet to be installed. This temporary parking area has been requested by the City and some merchants of the City, to help the parking situation during the busy season. The members were concerned as to how the parking lot would be maintained. Mr. Austin informed them that it would be a free parking lot. Mr. Wilson stated that he did not feel the Agency could justify this free lot, when we were under lease to Harris Company for the lot on 2nd Street. This would cause unfair competition for parking lots in the area of 4th Street. After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to table this matter, until it could be studied thoroughly by the Agency Counsel and Executive Director. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None CPA SERVICES, R-10: Mr. Austin requested authorization to invite proposals for CPA services, for the R-10 bonds, as required under the terms of the Bond issue. It was explained that invitations for proposals will be sent to all CPA1s in San Bernardino listed in the phone book. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the Executive Director to invite proposals for CPA services in con- nection with Meadowbrook bonds. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ... ...... lIIIIIII .... .... - 1123 ....... DISPOSITION OF WEST END. CALIF. R-79: i..- Mr. Austin stated that as informally discussed at the Special Meeting of June 26th, Griffith Company would like some assurance that the Agency would not sell the West End property within 60 days, so that they may prepare their plans. Mr. Wilson suggested that the Agency notify Griffith and any other perspective developers who might express a desire for the property, that all proposals will be reviewed and considered by the Agency at the first Regular Meeting in Sep- tember. All Members felt that this would be the best method of disposition. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1086 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING TIME FOR CONSIDERING PROPOSALS FOR DISPOSITION OF LAND COM- PRISING THE WEST END OF THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT ~ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California by Resolution No. 996, approved the method of disposing of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project No.1, Calif., R-79, and determined the criteria for the selection of Redevelopers for said land; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California by Resolution No. 997, approved the respective prices of each parcel of said land and determined that said cost of said parcels was not less than the fair market value therefore; and -- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 998, established a cut-off date of May 26, 1969, for proposals for disposition of those parcels of land comprising the West End of the Central City Project (which parcels are listed in said Resolution No. 998), and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, deems it to be in the best public interest to extend the date for receipt of such proposals to and including 12:00 noon, September 4, 1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the ~1embers of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereby extend the date for receipt of proposals for disposition of said parcels of land comprising the West End of the Central City Project to and including 12:00 noon, September 4, 1969. RESOLVE FURTHER, that no action will be taken by the Agency on any proposals for disposition of any of such parcels of land until on or after 12:00 noon, September 4, 1969. RESOLVE FURTHER, that first consideration will be given to any proposal con- stituting an offer to purchase and develop all of said parcels comprising the West End of the Central City Project. ,..... Adopted: 7/3/69 ....... 1124 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1086. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ... - "E" ST.REET WIDENING, SANTA FE AGREH1ENT: Mr. Austin stated that the City has informed us that Santa Fe Railway has reviewed the plans for "E" Street widening and has agreed to the proposal. They have surveyed the crossing and estimate the cost to modify their main line and spur tracks and communication facilities would be $11,630, the cost of which must be borne by the City and in-turn the Agency. The railway will share on a 50-50 basis the cost of installing automatic gate crossings, the total cost estimated to be $19,689. The total cost to the City would be $21,474.50. The ~lembers asked why there must be a gate crossing on "E" Street. Mr. Desrochers stated that the Public Utility Commission requires that all renovated grade crossings on a major thoroughfare have gate crossings. This crossing will be on IIE" Street between Athol and Rialto Avenue. All Members felt that a gate crossing would lessen the beauty of the street. One of our main responsibilities as an Agency is to beautify the City. Mr. Wilson moved that the matter be tabled until the Agency has time to study the situation, and suggest alternative methods for this railway crossing. The motion was seconded by Wein. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .... GRANT DEED ESTABLISHING PERIMETER DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC ~~LL: Authority was requested for the Chairman and Secretary to execute Grant Deed establishing perimeter description of the public mall, in order to establish a description of record for description writing purposes, for disposition parcels surrounding the public mall area, for John Griffith/Curci-Turner Company. The following resolution was introduced: ........ RESOLUTION NO. 1087 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE GRANT DEED ESTABLISHING PERIMETER DESCRIPTION OF THE PUBLIC MALL WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in executing the adopted Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project Area No. 1, Calif. R-79, has made provision for an area to be known as the "Pub1ic Mal1"; and WHEREAS, construction of the two-story covered public mall is eminent; and WHEREAS, the legal descriptions of the land to be privately developed surrounding the public mall are to utilize the legal description of the public mall as a point of beginning; and ..... --- 1125 ""'- WHEREAS, it is therefore necessary to establish the legal description of the public mall of record. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary be authorized to execute a Grant Deed establishing a perimeter legal description of the public mall and cause said Grant Deed to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Bernardino. ....... Adopted: 7/3/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1087. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: "..,... Mr. Austin stated that he would like to express the Agency's appreciation for the dedication and interest Mr. Joe Baker, Sun Telegram, and Mrs. Cecil Willoughby, League of Women Voters, have given the Agency. He further stated that he would like Mr. Baker and Mrs. Willoughby to sit at the head table at the luncheon following the ground breaking ceremony. Mr. Baker and Mrs. Willoughby expressed their appreciation, and stated that they would attend the ground breaking and luncheon, but would prefer to sit in the audience. Mr. Wilson stated that per- haps the Agency could consider a motion or resolution commending Mr. Baker and Mrs. Willoughby for their dedication and efforts for the betterment of San Bernardino. """'- ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 5:15 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,..... ~. , ......, 1126 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA HELD THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ... -.II The meeting was called to order at 4:10 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wein, Webster and Wilson Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mr. Gresham, Condemnation Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary Mr. Austin introduced the Board to the audience. MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 3, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 3, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: IIIIIIIl The Expenditures for the month of June, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. After review and discussion, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the approval of the Expenditures for the month of June, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ..... INVESTMENTS: The Investments for the month of June, 1969 were presented to the Members for ap- proval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson approving the Investments for the month of June, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Allen Gresham reported as follows: Western Union Property --- The Agency has title to the property. They indicate that they will move between the 1st and 15th of August. There is a dispute con- /cerning the value of their off-site improvements, and whether they are entitled to any compensation for them. Trial is set for August 4th, to determine the lease hold interest of Western Union. It appears that we are progressing on schedule. ..... Aucutt Property --- The building has been demolished and set for trial October ___ 20, 1969. ,.t. ,;"._._;...~ ." _ ~f"~E_1'. .-, 1127 r L Rose Property --- Located at 2nd and "E" Streets. The answer has been filed. They have been notified that we will accommodate their wishes as to when to go to trial. Southern Pacific Right-of-Way --- Real Estate Department has indicated that a mutual settlement has been offered. They have been informed of the great urgency of acquiring this right-af-way. They have accepted service of the Summons and Complaint. Pep Boys Property --- Mr. Gresham stated that he believes this action will be settled in 30 days. Amy Philips Property --- Located at the southeast corner of Court and "E" Streets. Has been filed. The tenant, Harris and Frank and the owner were served on June 30th and July 1st. It is believed that it will be scheduled for trial within six months. Actions have been filed on all properties south side of Third Street, between "0" and liE", and the south side of Court Street between "0" and "E". Dixon Wheel --- Set for trial October 27th. ,.....- Masonic Building --- The Judge has ruled that there is a public need for this building. We should receive a verdict from the jury tomorrow. Mr. Wein asked Mr. Quinn about the progress of the Third Amendatory, R-79. Mr. Quinn stated that he spoke to Mike Savage in HUD. He stated that the Amendatory is being processed, but no significant problems have been raised yet. DPC REQUEST FOR LEAVE WITH PAY, OSCAR BOWEN: --- Mr. Quinn stated that Oscar Bowen, E-5 Building Inspector Supervisor, has re- quested leave with pay for the trip he made to Jackson, Mississippi, to attend a DPC Conference. (June 30th, July 1,2 and 3) Mr. Wein stated that he felt this should be approved because the Agency will receive substantial benefit from Mr. Bowen's attendance. The following resolution was introduced: ,....... RESOLUTION NO. 1089 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING LEAVE WITH PAY FOR OSCAR BOWEN, E-5 BUILDING INSPECTOR SUPERVISOR, FOR JUNE 30TH, JULY 1st, 2nd and 3rd, 1969 WHEREAS, a DPC Conference was held in Jackson, Mississippi, and was attended by Oscar Bowen, E-5 Building In~pector Supervisor; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have determined that the leave of Oscar Bowen, for the days of June 30, July 1, 2, and 3, to attend said DPC Conference, will be for substantial benefit to the Agency. -- 1128 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the leave of Oscar Bowen, E-5 Building Inspector Supervisor, for the days of June 30, July 1, 2 and 3, 1969, is hereby approved, and the Agency Members do hereby authorize Oscar Bowen leave with pay for the days so mentioned for the attendance of a DPC Conference in Jackson, Mississippi. .... ..." Adopted: 7-17-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1089. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING, REUSE 15, 16 and PORTION OF 13b and 17, SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK, R-10: Mr. Austin stated that this is the time and place so designated for the Public Hearing of the sale of Reuse Parcels 15, 16 and portion of 13b and 17, to Southland National Bank, R-10. Mr. Varner stated that the form of Agreement is on hand for inspection if so desired. There being no objection to said sale, the Public Hearing was closed. PURCHASE OF REUSE 15, 16 and POITION OF 13b and 17, SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK; R-10: ..... The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1088 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 15, 16 AND A PORTION OF 13b and 17, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT NO. 1 TO SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION. ... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcels 15, 16 and a portion of 13b and 17, by Resolution No. 1084 to Southland National Bank, a national banking corp, and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel of said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held July 17,1969 in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 15, 16 and a portion of 13b and 17, Meadowbrook Project No.1 to Southland ..... ....... 1129 '- National Bank, a national banking corp, subject to approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and approval of a charter for Southland National Bank by the Comptroller of Currency. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon the close of escrow, a commission in the amount of $5,500 will be paid to David D. Wiitson, a licensed real estate broker, pursuant to the IINotice to Realtors and Redevelopersll dated June 30, 1969. Adopted: 7/17/69 r- ~ Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1088, authorizing the sale of Reuse Parcels 15, 16 and portion of 13b and 17, to Southland National Bank, R-10, and designating Mr. David D. Whitson as realtor. The commission for this sale is $5,500. OFFERS TO PURCHASE 11011 STREET PARCELS: "..,.- Mr. Austin stated that the Agency has received two offers to purchase the 11011 Street Parcels, R-79. They are as follows: Arrowhead Development, Nicolay-Hodgdon, Joint Venture, proposes to purchase Reuse Parcels 4, 9, 45 and 50, R-79 and Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, R-10. Mr. Warner Hodgdon, one of the joint venturers, presented his rendering to the Members. The proposed development is for a three story office build- ing of approximately 30,000 sq. ft. with a parking area of 35 cars on parcels 4 and 9, R-79 and a 12 story office building of approximately 120,000 sq. ft. with a parking area of 45 cars on parcels 45 and 50, R-79. They also propose to purchase Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47 in Meadowbrook, for a public parking lot. Mr. Hodgdon stressed the need in San Bernardino for additional private public parking. The approximate value of the 3 story building is $1,000,000 and will take about one year to construct. The approximate value of the 12 story building is $4,000,000 and will take about two years to con- struct. The purchase of these parcels is based on the following contingencies. 1) That the Agency acquire clear title to the property; 2) that a parking structure be constructed in the super block area, adjacent to their proposed development; and 3) That the Agency approve the purchase of R-10 property for private parking area. Mr. Hodgdon stated that he would like to lease the first floor of the 12 story~office building to a major bank, but that no firm commitments have been established. - "...... Suburban Associates, Ltd, proposes to purchase Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, R-79 for the development of a 12 story office building. Mr. Art Hayton presented their rendering to tbe Members. Mr. Hayton stated that their proposal is based upon the Redevelopment Plan for the Super Block. The Redevelopment Plan specifies that a twelve story building be constructed on parcels 45 and 50, R-79. He further stated that the approximate value of his proposed development is $3,500,000, and will take approximately 12 months to construct. The Rendering designates 50 parking spaces for the building, but if this is not adequate, Suburban Associates would consider underground parking which would increase the parking to about 150 cars. Mr. Hayton further stated that he has a commitment from a Bajor bank to lease the ground floor plus an additional 30,000 sq. ft. He has been negotiating with large insurance firms for leases, and a major restaurant has requested occupancy of a portion of the 12th floor. ........ -~~'P"""'~,",,~ 1130 The plan also has provisions for a roof heliport. The offer is based upon the contingency that the Agency guarantee the construction of the Parking Structure adjacent to their development, and that we guarantee adequate designated parking for tenants and users of their proposed development. Mr. Wein summarized as follows: The proposed development of Suburban Associates is valued at approximately $3,000,000 to $3,500,000. The totil proposed development of Arrowhead Development is valued at approximately $5,500,000; without the R-10 private public parking it is valued at approxi- mately $5,800,000; with th~ 12 story building alone, it is valued at appro- ximately $4,000,000. ~ ..... The Members were concerned regarding the parking situation of the Suburban proposal. All Members felt that additional time was needed to study and discuss with the architectural engineer the parking situation. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein that the Offers to Purchase the IIDII Street Parcels be tabled until July 31, 1969, at a Special Meeting in order that the Members may consult the Staff and Architectural Engineer regarding these developments. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR REDUCTION IN RENT, DIAMOND LOAN AND JEWELRY CO: Mr. Austin stated that we have received a letter from Diamond Loan and Jewelry Company requesting that their rent be reduced from $250.00 per month to $125.00 per month. Mr. Quinn explained that $250.00 was their original rent before the Agency purchased the property, and the Rental agreement established $250.00 as their rental to the Agency. They have received their 90 day letter to relocate. Mr. Webster stated that he is in favor of this reduction for a set period of time. All Members agreed. It was established that Diamond Loan and Jewelry should be allowed a reduction in rent from $250.00 to $125.00 per month for the months of August, September, and October. If they still remain in their present location after the month of October, 1969, said rent will be raised to $250.00 per month as-originally established. The following resolution was introduced: ...... .... RESOLUTION NO. 1090 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A REDUCTION OF RENT FOR DIAMOND LOAN AND JEWELRY CO., BLOCK 2, PARCEL 12 WHEREAS, Diamond Loan and Jewelry Company has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino for a rental fee of $250.00 per month; and WHEREAS, tenant has requested a 50% reduction of rental fee; and WHEREAS, tenant has been given a 90 day notice that they must relocate; and WHEREAS, after review by the Agency Members, it has been determined that said reduction of rent is proper for a fixed period of time -- starting August 1, 1969 and ending November 1, 1969. ..... ....... . ?J--. 1131 ..... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Diamond Loan and Jewelry Company's rent shall be reduced to $125.00 per month, for the months of August, September and October, 1969. r- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should Diamond Loan and Jewelry Company still remain at their location after the month of October, 1969, said rent will be raised to $250.00 per month, as originally established. Adopted: 7/17/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1090. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF ESCROW, REUSE PARCEL 82, R-10, WALTER DU BOSE: r- Mr. Austin explained that we are in receipt of a letter request from Walter Du Bose regarding an extension of his escrow. Mr. Larry Glassock, Real Estate Manager, stated that the request is wanted in order that Mr. DuBose may obtain a Small Business Loan. Mr. DuBose has stated that if he is un- successful in obtaining a loan by November 7, 1969, he will use his own money to close the escrow. All Members felt that said extension was warranted. The following resolution was introduced: - RESOLUTION NO. 1091 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE ESCROW ON R-10, REUSE PARCEL 82 TO NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 7,1969, WITH CONSTRUC- TION TO BEGIN NO LATER THAN JANUARY 7, 1970 WHEREAS, Walter R. DuBose has submitted an acceptable proposal to develop Meadowbrook Project No.1, R-10, Reuse Parcel 82; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1085 adopted on July 3, 1969, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino authorized the Chairman and Secretary to execute the necessary documents to complete the sale of Reuse Parcel 82 to Walter R. DuBose; and WHEREAS, Walter R. DuBose is making application to the Small Business Ad- ministration for the necessary funds to complete the development of Reuse Parcel 82; and r- WHEREAS, the time involved in obtaining funding from the Small Business Administration is in excess of the normal 60 day escrow period required by the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the escrow on Reuse Parcel 82 be extended to close no later than 11-7-69 and construction on the subject parcel to commence no later than 1-7-70 ...... Adopted: 7/17/69 r- -.,;'"".....l 1132 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1091. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .... ... VICTOR GRUEN CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO.5, TEMPORARY PARKING AREA, R-79: Mr. Austin stated that he contacted the City regarding the necessity for a temporary parking area on 4th Street. He was informed by Mayor Ballard that the City is very much in need of this area. After discussion the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1092 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 5 WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSO. CONTRACT FOR PARKING DESIGN, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has entered into a Contract dated the 8th day of December, 1967, with Victor G"uen Asso- ciates for Parking Design for the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, said Contract was amended by Contract Amendment No.1, the 1st day of May, 1968; Contract Amendment No.2 the 16th day of September, 1968; Contract Amendment No. 3 the 19th day of November, 1968 and Contract Amendment No.4 the 5th day of March, 1969; and ...., , WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Contract Amendment No.5 in creasing the services of the Contractor consisting of preparing complete working drawings and specifications in connection with a temporary parking area on 4th Street. ..... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 5 with Victor Gruen Associates for contract for Parking Design to include additional services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an equitable adjustment of the contract price, not to exceed $800.00 for this Contract Amendment No.5, shall be incorporated in said Contract Amendment. Adopted: 7/17/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1092. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None VICTOR GRUEN BILLINGS - CENTRAL CITY COMMITTEE & INLAND ACTION: ...... Billings were presented to the Members from Victor Gruen Associates in con- nection with study made for the Central City Committee and a study made for Inland Action. ...." '~"'-"'" ~~:;-$'~"'""'~l"""""'~~~)' .~:~~-tf.i-\'ll-r1il'?J~:~~-"._~,~,~~,~.~~1;_':'1'~"~;"~"!_"'~1:"'.{t~~~-.-~,~?~.."..,~_~~~~...4t:~.~~'"-<'_____. 1133 [ There is an outstanding amount of $723.84 due Victor Gruen for work done for the Central City Committee. There is also an amount of $3,170.74 due Victor Gruen for work done for Inland Action. Inland Action did not receive all the contributions they had anticipated; consequently, they are short $2,500 from their initial declaration of pledge. It is the Agency's understanding that payment will be made, but we have no definite date as to when. Upon receipt of the $2,500, there will still be an outstanding amount of $670.74 due Victor Gruen from work done for Inland Action. Mr. Varner stated that he has reviewed the matter and it is his opinion that the charges must be paid by the Central City Committee and Inland Action. The Agency cannot legally pay the charges. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein denying the payment of billings from Victor Gruen Associates in con- nection with studies made for the Central City Committee and Inland Action. The motion further instructed the Executive Director to so notify Central City Committee, Inland Action, and Victor Gruen of the Board's decision. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION, UNIT NO. 25, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Austin stated that bids for Demolition Unit No. 25, Calif. R-79, were opened June 8, 1969. The low bidder is Dakeno, Inc. fDr the amount of $9,780. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: "".- RESOLUTION NO. 1093 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC., FOR DEMO- LITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 25, CALIF. R-79 L WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21,1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 25, for the demolition and clearance of certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun-telegram a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on June 20, and 27, 1969, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and ~ ! ~ '1 ....., WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m., on the 8th day of July, 1969, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and 1134 WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud; and ..., J WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Dakeno, Inc., is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Dakeno, Inc. for the sum of $9,780.00, is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 25, Calif. R-79, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 7/17/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1093. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, R-10, REUSE 69a, BUSSEY & HUDSON: RESOLUTION NO. 1094 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO LINDLEY O. HUDSON, LOUISE M. HUDSON, KENNETHC. BUSSEV AND KATflARYN BUSSEY ..... -" WHEREAS, Lindley O. Hudson, Louise M. Hudson, Kenneth C. Bussey and Katharyn Bussey, hereinafter called the Redevelopers, have entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated February 1,1968, was recorded on April 3,1968, in Book 7002 on page 532 and said Grant Deed, dated February 1,1968, was recorded on April 3, 1968, in Book 7002 on page 524, both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of Calif- orni a; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed, Redevelopers covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in section 4 of said Deed to furnish the Redevelopers with an instrument certifying completion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redevelopers completion thereof; and WHEREAS, said real property is described as: .., -'" 1135 L All that real property in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as: ,...- .~ All that portion of Lot 1, Block 10, RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, per Map recorded in Book 7, Page 2 of Maps, in the office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: ".,..... Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Lot 1 with the North line of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Right of Way, 50.00 feet wide; thence North along said East line, 304.00 feet to the beginning ofa tangent curve concave Southwesterly with a radius of 20.00 feet, said curve is also tangent to the North line of said Lot 1; thence Northwesterly along said tangent curve through a central angle of 900 011 35" a distance of 31.43 feet to the last mentioned North line; thence South 89058125" West, along said last mentioned North line, 138.72 feet; thence South eOOl135" East, 3.95 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Westerly with a radius of 315.00 feet; thence Southerly along said tangent curve through a central angle of 2201014711 a distance of 121.94 feet; thence South 22009112" West, 114.35 feet to the beginning a tangent curve concave Southeasterly with a radius of 585.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said tangent curve through a central angle of 7037126" a distance of 77.84 feet to the West line of the East two (2) acres of said Lot 1; thence South along said West line 21.36 feet to the first mentioned North line; thence North 89059125" East 249.58 feet to the Point of Beginning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED in accordance with Section 4 of said Agreement and Section 4 of said Grant Deed, that the Agency does hereby conclusively certify and give notice that the Redevelopers have fully satisfied'5terminated and completed, for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agree- ments with respect to the obligation of Redevelopers for the construction of improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinafter described real property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". I.....- Adopted: 7/17/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 1094. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None TRIP TO SACRAMENTO, JULY 14-15, QUINN-VARNER-WEBSTER: "...... Mr. Webster reported to the Members the results of the trip to Sacramento, July 14-15. He stated that the purpose of the trip was to obtain a more favorable position for Redevelopment Agencies in the sale of their Redevelopment Bonds. As they arrived at the State Capital, Assemblyman Knox was about to present to the Assembly, Assembly Bill 2056, whereby the interest rates for bonds would be increased from 7% to 8~%. Mr. Webster stated that they suggested to Assemblyman Knox that the Bill would develop more interest if the interest ....., 1136 rate remained the same, and the Bonds could be sold at a discount. The Bill was presented to the Assembly and the amendment suggested by the Agency set forth. This amendment seemed a more acceptable.. one; O'Melvenyand Myers are now in the process of amending the Bill. The Amended Assembly Bill No. 2056 should be presented to the Assembly next week. The following resolution was introduced: -, '.~j ..." RESOLUTION NO. 1095 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AGENCY COUNSEL, AND AGENCY MEMBER, GEORGE WEBSTER, TO TRAVEL TO SACRAMENTO, JULY 14-15, 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found essential that the Executive Director, the Agency Counsel, and Agency Member, George Webster, travel to Sacramento to meet with State Senators and Assemblymen at the State Capital, on July 15,1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino does hereby approve of the trip made to the State Capital in Sacramento, July 14-15, 1969, by the Executive Director, Agency Counsel and Agency Member George Webster, and their travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 302. ..... ;..> ~ Adopted: 7/17/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1095. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Webster Absent: None IIEII STREET CROSSING: Mr. Austin stated that Paul Desrochers, Operations Officer, has contacted the City Engineering Office regarding the substitution of flashing lights for automatic gates at the IIEII Street Railroad crossing. The City contacted the Santa Fe Railway Company and they in turn contacted Public Utilities Commission. Mr. Desrochers reported that there is a chance that they might allow us to use flashing lights. It will be necessary to request Santa Fe to prepare a revised Agreement providing for the installation of flashing lights without automatic gates. Obtaining the approval of this revised Agreement from PUC would take approximately 90 days. All Members agreed that we should request this revision. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein instructing the Executive Director to request a revised Agreement with Santa Fe, substituting Flashing Lights for automatic gates at the IIEII Street rai 1 road crossi ng. The moti on was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ ...... 1137 ",.. i L DIFFENBAUGH CHANGE ORDER NO.1, R-79: Mr. Quinn stated that because of an error in the plans prepared by Victor Gruen Asso. the Southwest and Southeast Arcades, at their terminus with the upper level of the completed parking area, have been found to conflict. Authority was requested to execute Change Order No.1 with J.D.Diffenbaugh's contract, due to a revision of retaining walls and ramps, the relocation of the temporary electrical panel box and the excavation of some of the parking area. The Change Order will not exceed the sum of $2,000. The Members stated that the responsible party should be responsible for this increase in contract price. Mr. Varner suggested that we should authorize the Change Order to Diffenbaugh's Contract for whatever cost involved, but seek reimbursement from the responsible party (which should be determined after thorough investigation). The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 1096 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CONTRACT WITH J. D. DIFFENBAUGH FOR PUBLIC MALL CONSTRUCTION, R-79 --- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, executed Contract with J. D. Diffenbaugh, Site Preparation Unit No.2, Public Mall Construction, R-79, dated the 27th day of June, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to have the Contractor alter their construction plans per the forthcoming revisions of Gruen Associates with regards to the Southeast and Southwest Arcades; f"""" NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute Change Order No.1 to contract with J. D. Diffenbaugh, Unit No.2, Calif. R-79, for whatever amount is involved. Adopted: 7/17/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 1096. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein instructing the Executive Director to thoroughly investigate the matter to determine the responsible party for the Diffenbaugh Change Order, and to seek reimbursement from said responsible party. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: none Absent: None ,......., --- 1138 OTHER BUSINESS: ... CPA Proposals: Morse Topper, Finance Officer, stated that he sent invitations for proposals for CPA services, for R-10 bonds, to 24 CPA's in San Bernardino. Only one firm examined the Agency's records. He stated that he could not give a firm proposal, because he did not know how many hours would be required to perform this service. Mr. Topper stated that he contacted other agencies, and they have run into the same problem. He requested authorization from the Members to resubmit the invitations, requesting proposals on an hourly basis. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the invitation of proposals for CPA services in connection with R-10 bonds, on an hourly basis instead of a fixed proposal. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None I1 ....J Prospective Developer: Mr. Austin stated that Glaser Brothers has expressed an interest in erecting a candy factory on the old Water Department property. This property is a portion of Arrowhead Development's proposed offer. If Glaser Brothers submits a formal Offer to Purchase this property, they too will be involved in the Special Meeting to be held July 31st. Harri s Company: ..... Mr. Quinn stated that the architect for the Harris Company will be in a position ... to advertise for bids shortly. PostponemenLofRegu1ar Meeting: Mr. Wilson stated that he will be out of twon for the next Regular Meeting scheduled for August 7, 1969. He will be available Friday, August 8th. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster postponing the Regular Meeting of August 7, 1969 to August 8, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention; none Absent: none Sped a 1 Meeti ng : Mr. Wein requested that a Personnel Session also be scheduled for the Special Meeting of July 31st. Mr. Quinn stated that it would be noted on the Notice of Special Meeting. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster adjourning the meeting at 6:45 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: ., Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: none Abstention: none Absen~ ... ........ 1139 ~.. L MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA r- The Chairman reported that this Special Meeting was duly called in accordance with law. The Notice of Special Meeting is as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at the office of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California 323 Court Street, Room 305, in the City of San Bernardino, the regular meeting place thereof at 4:00 p.m., the 31st day of July, 1969, for the following purposes: 1. To select the most desirable developer for the purchase of "0" Street parcels R-10/R-79 2. Personnel Session 3. Resolution approving & providing for the execution If the Fifth Amendatory Contract Calif. R-10 "..... DATED this 29th day of July, 1969. iIoo..- sIP. W. ~uinn, Jr. P. W. Qu nn, Jr. Secretary-Treasurer 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I. P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 29th day of July, 1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Califor- nia, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL WITNESS my hand this 29th day of July, 1969. sIP. W. quinn, Jr. P. W. QUlnn, Jr. Secretary-Treasurer "..... The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:10 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson, Wein and Webster Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quing, Executive Director, and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary "- 1140 Mr. Austin informed all present that the tape recorder will be used for the entire meeting. He further stated that the use of the recorder was re- quested by some of the parties in attendance. 4:10 p.m. - Bruce Varner, Agency Counsel, arrived at the meeting. ,., 11 1'i .... DEVELOPER FOR "0" STREET PARCELS: Mr. Austin stated that this item was originally on the Agenda at the last Regular Meeting, held July 17, 1969. By motion, the matter was tabled to todays Special Meeting, in order that the Members could consult with Staff and Architectural Engineer regarding the two proposals. Presentations were given as follows: Arrowhead Development, Nicolay-Hodgdon, Joint Venture: Mr. Hodgdon stated that Arrowhead Development proposes to purchase Reuse Parcels 4, 9, 45 and 50, R-79 and Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46, and 47, R-10. They desire to build a series of buildings. He stated that they have the experience and background to complete this development on time, which is an economic must. The new plot plan was presented to the Members. Mr. Hodgdon stated that in their judgment, the parking available is not adequate. For this reason, their original pro- posal specified also the purchase of Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47 in R-10 for a private parking area. Mr. Hodgdon stated that they have revised their proposal for R-10 to include two structures --- a two story building of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. and a one story building, of approximately 30,000 sq ft. The remainder of said R-10 parcels will be used for parking. A three story office building of 30,000 sq. ft. will be developed on Parcels 4 & 9, R-79 and a twelve story office building of 120,000 sq. ft. will be developed on parcels 45 and 50, R-79. The total square footage for the entire development is 220,000 sq. ft. The total investment is approximately $7,000,000. Mr. Hodgdon stated that the Offer to Purchase is for the total package of R-10 and R-79 properties. Mr. Hodgdon stated his time schedule as follows: R-79, Three story building --- Start construction within 12 months R-79, Twelve story building --- Pay for the ground no later than 90 days from the start of construction of the parking garage. Construction to start within 90 days thereafter. 12 months for completion. R-10, One and Two story buildings --- Whenever the Agency can deliver title, Arrowhead Development is ready to open escrow and follow regular Agency Dis- position procedures regarding closing escrow and starting construction. Mr. Wilson was concerned regarding the Agency's assurance that all of the develop- ment so proposed would be accomplished. Mr. Hodgdon stated that it is Arrow- head Developments intention to comply with Agency procedure of forfeiture of their Option Deposit if they do not comply. The Members asked Mr. Quinn how acquisition of the Water Department property (Reuse 44, 45, 46 and 47 R-10) was proceeding. Mr. Quinn stated that the --.. -..l !lllIIIII ..... 1141 ",..... Agency has not yet received concurrence from HUD for this property. but that it should be received in two weeks. this acquisition will take condemnation action because of their charter provisions. Mr. Varner stated that the Agency can file action immediately upon receipt of HUD Concurrence. The only real holdup of this property would be the relocation of the Water Department. If the action is not contested it should only take a matter of 30 days to acquire title. If contested. 6 to 8 months are involved. Mr. Hodgdon stated that upon the Agency's acquisition of the Water Department property and clearance of land. Arrowhead Development could start construction of their one story building and parking area. while the administration office of the Water Department is waiting for relocation. After their relocation they could start construction of the two story building. The Members asked Mr. Varner how the acquisition of the property needed for the parking structure was proceeding. Mr. Varner stated that all property is under condemnation. We are anticipating title in 8 to 10 months. Mr. Branigan of Victor Gruen Associates stated that they would need four months to proceed with their plans. It was determined that the Agency could actually start construction of the parking garage within twelve months. Mr. Wilson asked Mr. Hodgdon if they have any committed finance. Mr. Hodgdon introduced Mr. Nicolay to the Board. Mr. Nicolay stated that they would have no difficulty whatsoever in borrowing the money to finance this project. and that the total assets of parties involved was over $7.000.000. Suburban Associates. Ltd: Mr. Art Hayton presented his associates to the Members of the Board. Mr. Hayton stated that Suburban Associates is offering to purchase Reuse Parcels 45 and 60. R-79. for the development of a twelve story office structure of approximately 120.000 sq. ft.. and value of approximately $3.500.000. He further stated that it is their opinion that the primary use of this parcel may determine the success or failure of the "Super Block" area. Mr. Hayton stated that he and his associates have made a study of the parking situation. and have determined that the parking concept as set forth by Victor Gruen Associates is adequate for their building. Charts setting forth their survey were shown and explained to the Members. After evaluating the situation, they have determined that a building of this si2e would employ 547 employees, instead of the 800 originally quoted. Mr. Hayton clarified that the heliport provisions on top of the building would not be for commercial use. Mr. Hayton stated that their proposal is definite. It is not based upon any contingencies. The tax structure is dependent upon what is definite, and what can be produced in tax revenue. He stated that they are in a position to start construction 90 days after the close of escrow. Mr. Hayton further stated that they have inquired into the availability of money, and that they have several letters of interest from financial institutions. He further stated that they have received several commitments of tenancy. Security Pacific National Bank has stated that they desire to occupy 20.000 sq. ft. or possibly as much as 30,000 sq. ft. A major restaurant has indicated their desire to occupy the 12th floor. They also have an indication from a major law firm that they desire to lease the 10th floor. r- t .... "..- - ........ 1142 Mr. Hayton stated that Suburban Associates is made up of sound men with experience in this type of development. He stated that they would use local construction products and local labor. Mr. Wilson asked Mr. Hayton if Suburban.s proposal is contingent upon the parking structure. Mr. Hayton stated that they would have to be assured that the parking structure would be built. Mr. Hayton stated that they have been in contact with Mr. John Pruitt, who re- presents a family trust. Mr. Pruitt is desirous of developing the entire "Super B10ck" area. ... ....... Mr. John Pruitt was introduced to the Board. Mr. Pruitt stated that he spoke to Mr. Quinn over the past few days regarding the development of the entire "Super Blockllarea, and was informed that two offers have already been presented for the purchase of a portion of this area. Due to the fact that they would not have adequate time to negotiate and prepare plans in time for the Special Meeting, they spoke to Suburban Associates regarding their desire to obtain an equity position in the 12 story building, if Suburban Associates 1s the successful purchaser. Mr. Wilson asked Mr. Pruitt if they would be willing to negotiate with either of the developers, depending on who was awarded the disposition agreement. Mr. Pruitt stated that he has only discussed the matter with Suburban Associates, but he would be willing to discuss it with Arrowhead Development if tbey are the successful purchaser. Mr. Wilson asked Mr. Hodgdon if Arrowhead Development ~ would be willing to negotiate with Mr. Pruitt if they were the successful purchaser. Mr. Hodgdon stated that if an equity position was obtained between ___ Mr. Pruitt and the successful developer, there would have to be a public hearing on this matter and authorization granted by the Board. Mr. Pruitt further stated that if he is able to obtain an equity position in the 12 story building from the successful purchaser, he then will desire to negotiate with the Agency for the purchase and development of the remainder of the IISuper Block" area. Mr. Wilson asked Mr. Dan Branigan, of Gruen Associates, if either prGposa1 represents any problem as for as Gruen.s concept for the IISuper B10ckll area. Mr. Branigan stated that both proposals are within the concept. Mr. Austin stated that Security Pacific National Bank has this afternoon p~esented a letter to the Agency. Mr. Austin read the letter in full to the Members. (A copy of the letter is attached to the Minutes of this meeting). The 1et~er stated Security Pacific.s interest in Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, Calif. R-79. They stated that they are prepared to acquire the property and construct a 30,000 sq. ft. office building. The letter set forth the long negotiations between Security Pacific and the Agency for this property since 1967. A letter from Mr.Jerome Sears, former Executive Director, and a letter from Warner Hodgdon, former Chairman, were attached to Security Pacific.s letter. These letters set forth the Agency.s negotiations with Security Pacific for this property. A Proposed Disposition Agreement, executed by the Agency, but not by the Security Pacific, was also attached to their letter. Mr. Austin explained to the Members that at the time of initial negotiations with Security Pacific for this property, the concept was not for a 12 story office building on this location. A three story office building at this time ..... ..... 1143 - would not comply to the Agency's concept for this "Super B10ck" area. Mr. Austin asked Mr. Eugene Johnson, Vice President of Security Pacific if the bank feels that the Agency should be held to these early negotiations. Mr. Johnson stated that this is the intent of the letter. Mr. Johnson stated that they have worked with the Agency since 1966 toward the purchase of this pro- perty, so that they may be relocated in the Central City area. He stated that the bank did not execute the Proposed Disposition Agreement because the Agency was not able to convey the land to them in 1967. Mr. Hodgdon stated that the intent of his letter of 1967 to Security Pacific was that of further negotiations with them for this property. The "Super B10ck" concept had not been prepared at that time. Mr. Austin asked Mr. Johnson if the bank is going to hold the Agency to any commitment to the purchase of this property. Mr. Johnson stated that the bank can only build a three story building on this property. They do verbally submit an Offer to Purchase for this property to the Board at this time. The Members asked the opinion of Mr. Varner concerning the Agency's obligation to Security Pacific. Mr. Varner stated that as a disp1acee in the Central City P.roject, Security Pacific should be given first preference for property within the projectrarea. Mr. Varner further stated that the Agency has been negotiating with Securitl Pacific since 1967, which shows the Agency's interest in them. The Agency also last month invited Security Pacific to submit a proposal for this property, but they declined to do so because they were concerned with the tenancy problem. The concept as adopted by the Agency specifies that a 12 story building be built on this parcel of land. Security Pacific desire only to build a three story structure. Mr. Varner stated that he knows of no formal action taken by the Board reserving this parcel of land for the bank. He further stated that if the Agency determines that the verbal Offer to Purchase submitted by Security Pacific should be denied, the Agency still has the obligation to see that the successful developer negotiate with Security Pacific for first choice of tenancy. Mr. Wein asked Arrowhead and Suburban if they would be willing to give Security Pacific first preference of tenancy, should they be the successful developer. Both firms indicated that they would. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson denying the proposal of Security Pacific National Bank for the purchase of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, R-79, for the development of the three story structure, because, while considering the preference, their proposal lis not within the Agency's policy of highest and best use of the property, and in view of the fact that the Agency has received two other proposals for said land for better and higher use. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster & Austin Noes: None Abstention: None ",.... ........ ,...,"".... ,...... I I I Ii..- The Members discussed the proposal of Arrowhead Development concerning the three story building to be built on Reuse 4 and 9, R-79. The concept specifies that a four story building should be built on this parcel. All members agreed that a three story building would really be more practical in that there will only be parking for 35 cars. After thorough consideration, the following resolutions were introduced: 1144 RESOLUTION NO. 1097 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT ARROWHEAD CORPORATION AND TED R. NICOLAY AND ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE, IS THE REDEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-79 REUSE PARCELS 4 and 9, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER'S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING --. ....... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelop- ment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcels 4 and 9 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its' intention to sell Reuse Parcels 4 and 9 to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay and Associates, a Joint Venture, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Central City Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the IIRedeve1oper's Statement for Public Disc1osure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held the 21st day of August, 1969. Adopted: 7/31/69 ...... ...... RESOLUTION NO. 1098 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT ARROWHEAD CORPORATION AND TED R. NICOLAY AND ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE IS THE REDEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-79 REUSE PARCELS 45 AND 50, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER'S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Central City PrOject to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2; and l ...., 1145 [ WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its' intention to sell Reuse Parcels 45 and 50 to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay and Associates, a Joint Venture, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Disposition of said parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Central City Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeve1oper's Statement for Public Disc1osure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held the 21st day of August, 1969. Adopted: 7/31/69 ,...... RESOLUTION NO. 1099 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT ARROWHEAD CORPORATION AND TED R. NICOLAY AND ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE, IS THE REDEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-10 REUSE PARCELS 44, 45, 46 and 47, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER'S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING '"'- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelop- ment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offeri ng . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its' intention to sell Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47 to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay and Associates, a Joint Venture subject to 'he concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeve1oper's Statement for Public Disc1osure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held the 21st day of August, 1969. Adopted: 7/31/69 r L 1146 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolutions No. 1097, 1098 and 1099, determining that the proposal of Arrowhead Corporation and Ted. R. Nicolay and Associates, a Joint Venture, for the pur- chase of Reuse Parcels 4, 9, 45 and 50, R-79 and Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, R-10, is the highest and best proposal offered for said parcels. The Members thanked Suburban Associates for their interest in our project and their offer to purchase. Mr. Austin explained that the Agency must accept the proposal that they feel is the highest and best use of the land for the City of San Bernardino. -... ~i :f~ i1 -J Mr. Hodgdon thanked the Members for their acceptance of Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay and Associates, a Joint Venture, proposal and stated that if the Members desire, they can alter their proposal somewhat to include an extra 10,000 sq. ft. in the 12 story building, to make up for the loss of 10,000 sq. ft. on Parcels 4 and 9, R-79, due to the construction of a three story building instead of the four story building as set forth in Gruen Associates' concept. In this way the ultimate obligation will be met by Arrowhead Corporation. FIFTH AMENDATORY, R-10: The following resolution was introduced by Mr. A. M. Austin, explained and con- sidered: RESOLUTION NO. 2000 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION OF A FIFTH AMENDATORY CONTRACT AMENDING LOAN AND GRANT CONTRACT NO. CALIF. R-10 (LG) BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS: ., .... SECTION 1. The pending proposed Fifth Amendatory Contract (herein called the "Amendatory Contract), to amend that certain Loan and Grant Contract No. Calif. R-10 (LG), effected October 24, 1958, by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California (herein called the "Local Public Agency") and the United States of America (herein called the "Government"), is hereby in all respects approved. SECTION 2. The Chairman is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendatory Contract in two counterparts on behalf of the Local Public Agency, and the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to impress and attest the official seal of the Local Public Agency on each such counterpart and to fo~- ward such counterparts to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, for execution on behalf of the government, together with such other documents relative to the approval and execution of such counterparts as may be required by the Government. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted: 7/31/69 ~ ...... 1147 '-' Mr. E. George Webster moved that the foregoing resolution be adopted as intro- duced and considered, which motion was seconded by Mr. Sanford H. Wein, and upon roll call the "Ayes" and "Nays" were as follows: ,...-- AYES NAYS - E. George Webster Sanford H. Wein Ray M. Wi 1 son A. M. Austin None The Chairman, A. M. Austin, thereupon declared said motion carried and said Resolution adopted. Mr. Varner stated that the Agency should have title to the Masonic Building by Monday, and he therefore suggests that the Board instruct the Executive Director to give official notice to John S. Griffith/Curci-Turner Company, so that their escrow on the mall property can close escrow 120 days after said official notice. The Members so instructed the Executive Director. PERSONNEL SESSION: r-- Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to table the personnel session until the next Regular Meeting. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None II....". ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 6:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ",..... I '- 1148 THIS SIDE NOT USED. --- '1 ...." .... ...... ... j ~ j~ ....J ".... ~ ! \- r"'- "'- "...... ."-' 1149 . F~~-:j (.~ ~"ij SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK INLAND DIVISION HEADQUARTERS, 3800 MAIN STREET, RIVERSIDE. PHONE (714) 686.0100 MAILING ADDRESS: POST OFFICE BOX 712, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 July 31, 1969 Hr. Feter W. Quinn, Director Redevelopment Agency City of San Bernardino, California De4r Mr. Quinn: Reference: Third and "D" Streets, San Bernardino . As you know, through our Citizens National Company, we own prop- erty at the southeast corner of Third and "E" Streets and operate our San Bernardino Main Office from this location. Inasmuch as this prop- erty is within the redevelopment project and is being acquired by the Agency, it is our understanding that, under Sections 33339, 33339.5, and 33380 of the California Health and Safety Code, we are entitled to preference as a participating property owner in the redevelopment project. Our interest in rehousing our San Bernardino Office goes back to 1967, when we first opened discussions with the Agency. We have worked with the Agency in good faith and have relied on certain representations that were made to us by members of the Redevelopment Agency. In April, 1967, Mr. Jerome F. Sears, Jr., who was then the Executive Director of the Agency, advised that, within thirty days, the Agency would be in a position to enter into a fi~al disposition agreement in the area in which Security Pacific National Bank desired to locate. Sub~equently, on July 1, 1967, Mr. Warner W. Hodgdon, then Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency, confirmed the Redevelopment Agency of San Bernardino would hold the south- west corner of Third and "D" for us. Copies of both Mr. Hodgdon's and Hr. Sears' letters are attached hereto for reference purposes. Since that time, in reliance on the representations cited above, we bave been in continuous discussions with the Agency, discussing alter- natives by which Security Pacific National Bank would be able to acquire property and construct new banking quarters. Our needs are most urgent, and we are very anxious to move forward with a redevelopment program. The delay is working a hardship on the Bank. 1150 Mr. Peter W. Quinn, Director July 31, 1969 Page Two The purpose of this letter is to be sure there'is no misunderstand- ing of what Security Pacific National Bank/Citizens National Company is prepared to do. As we previously advised the Board, we are prepared to move forward with the acquisition of real estate and the immediate con- struction of a 30,000 square foot office building of which the Bank would occupy approximately 20,000 square feet. If we are able to complete lease. negotiations currently being carried on with several major prospective tenants, we will expand the building from the committed 30,000 square feet to accommodate such lessees. We believe this is a realistic program and one which would be of benefit to the City of San Bernardino. We are aware that the Agency has indicated a preference for the development of a l2-story office building on the site with the Bank as the ground floor tenant. We have discussed such a project with three different developers whom we believe to be knowledgeable and have been unable to encourage them to commit to the development of such an office building. We are aware also that a proposal is being ma~e by Suburban Investors to erect a 12-story building on the same site. We have indicated to them our preference to be owner/occupant of a 30,000 square foot building but have assured them, also, of our willingness to finalize lease negotiations for 20,000 square feet if they are successful in their efforts to develop a l2-story building. We again restate our desire to proceed immediately to consumate the development as presented by the Agency through Messrs. Sears and Hodgdon. We would encourage the Redevelopment Agency to give serious consideration to the feasibility and probability of accomplishment of all proposals. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, /~L .' /{/ / /'(b~~~ " a Senior Vice Pres~dent Enclosures ., ~ ....J .... ~ .~ .... ..".