HomeMy WebLinkAbout24- City Manager
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR couNcQ~!~~L
Date: May 12, 2009
Subject: Resolutions establishing
certain fees for services furnished by
the City of San Bernardino, and an
ordinance clarifying the City's
authority to charge for certain fees.
From: Lori Sassoon, Acting City Manager
Dept: City Manager's Office
Meeting Date:
May 18, 2009
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
May 4,2009 - Item continued until May 18, 2009
April 20, 2009 - Item continued until May 4, 2009
April 6, 2009 - Item continued until April 20, 2009
March 16, 2009 - Mayor and Common Council set a public hearing for April 6, 2009
,March 4 & March 11, 2009 - Reviewed by Ways and Means Committee and recommended for
approval
Recommended motion:
Adopt resolutions, lay clarifying ordinance over for final adoption, and send draft ordinances
regarding illegal signs and yard sales to the Legislative Revie'( co~tee for discussion and
review. ../,,;Jl'\
I i!J . ;;
( /,1 _---
Signature
Contact person:
Lori Sassoon
Phone: 384-5122
Supporting data attached:
Staff report, worksheets,
resolutions and ordinance
Ward: All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Net additional revenue ofapprox.
$740,000 in FY 09-10
Source: (Acct. No.) Various
(Acct. Description) General Fund
Finance:
Council Notes: ~4~~ S;11~/00 dt;2o
Agenda Item #- 'd- L(
o -- 1-' Or
ST AFF REPORT
Subiect:
Resolutions establishing certain fees for services furnished by the City of San Bernardino, and an
ordinance clarifying the City's authority to charge for certain fees.
Back2:round:
Fees for service, otherwise called user fees, are calculated by determining the actual cost of the
services being provided. Since the late 1990's, the Mayor and Common Council has approved
numerous comprehensive user fee updates, usually in the spring of each year. The last of such updates
were approved in May and June of 2008.
As part of the City's budget reduction measures to close the projected budget deficit, each department
was asked to re-evaluate fees and look into the possibility of new fees. The result of the department's
analysis is approximately $740,000 in additional revenue for FY 09-10. The majority of the proposed
fees were included as part of the budget discussions during the budget meetings on February 2 and
February 17, 2009. Departments submitting new and increased fees include Animal Control, City
Clerk, Code Enforcement, Development Services, Facilities, Fire, Public Services, and Police.
Attachment A contains a summary of fees to be considered for establishment and/or revision at this
time. For each new and revised fee included in Attachment A, departments have completed cost
analysis worksheets with information regarding each service for which a fee is charged, including the
job titles of any employees involved, the amount of staff time involved in providing the service, and
other related costs for materials, supplies, equipment, utilities, etc. Information regarding hourly salary
and benefit rates is also included in the worksheets. Generally, each department's recommended fees
are based on this service cost; certain charges, such as fines, are not required to be based on the cost of
service. Staff has also gathered information concerning comparable fees in neighboring jurisdictions,
and that information is included on the worksheets.
Key changes to the fee schedule include the following:
. Animal Control is proposing to increase fees related to the boarding and apprehension of
animals. Many of these fees have not been updated for several years. The proposed fees would
eliminate the two tier apprehension fee for altered and unaltered pets. The new fees would set a
single fee of $100 for the first apprehension, $200 for the second apprehension, and $350 for
the third and subsequent apprehensions.
. Fee Adjustments for Animal Control would also eliminate a two tiered adoption fee for dogs
and cats ($25) versus puppies and kittens ($40) by establishing a single fee of $30. The change
in fee structure will not result in the loss of money for Animal Control.
. Code Enforcement is proposing two fee increases related to weed abatement. One fee is for
staff time for inspection of the vacant lots, notices, billing and coordination of the contractors
for the actual abatement. The other fee is for staff time involved in the lien process, when
applicable, and includes the hearing with the Hearing Officer and the BBC. Neither of these
fees has been increased since 1996. Not only has the volume of work increased since that time,
5/14/2009
1
but staff costs have also increased. Total estimated revenue from the fee changes IS
approximately $196,000.
. Code Enforcement has also proposed to update administrative fees for costs incurred on
abatements of private property, buildings, abandoned vehicles and weeds. The seven fees on
the resolution were consolidated into four fees, with an estimated revenue increase of
approximately $170,000. The majority of the proposed increase is attributed to the
consolidation of the administrative fees associated with the creation of demand letters and for
each line item on the demand letter. Updating these fees would bring the combined fee to $95
for the creation of a demand letter.
. Development Services has proposed a number of new fees to recoup personnel costs for
multiple plan re-checks, revisions to approved plans, and citizen requested stop signs and red
curbs. The proposed fees include the creation of a combo permit, which combines the
excavation ($45) and lane closure ($45) permits that contractors typically request at the same
time; the cost of the combined permit would be $53. The new combo permit would allow the
contractors to pull one permit, creating efficiencies for both the City and the contractor.
Development Services staff estimates there is a proposed revenue loss of $10,900, which will
be offset by gains in efficiency.
. Development Services is requesting the addition of a NPDES inspection fee to offset the costs
of the City's NPDES inspection program. Once an inspection is completed, the costs of the
inspection will be added to the following year's business registration renewal. This process
will ensure the City will only collect fees on inspections that are actually completed, and will
reduce the General Fund's net cost for these federally-mandated reviews.
. The Facilities Department is proposing to increase all parking fees by $5 to comply with SB
1407, which has increased the State Courthouse Construction Penalty from $1.50 to $4.50 per
citation. Increasing the parking penalty covers the state penalty increase and collection costs as
allowed by CVC Section 40200.4(f). Estimated total revenue increase, net of the Courthouse
Construction Penalty increase which benefits the state, is $30,000.
. The Facilities Department has increased the commercial parking fee from $65 to $260. An
associated ordinance amending Chapter 10.16 of the City's Municipal Code was passed by the
Mayor and Common Council on April 20, 2009. The fee will not become effective on May 21,
2009.
. The Police Department is proposing to increase the fees charged for non-permitted false
robbery/burglary alarms. In addition, the tow release fee is being increased from $215 to $230.
. The Fire Department proposes to reduce its apartment inspection fees by 5% for compliant
property owners that have met two criteria: 1) All fire code violations noted during the initial
inspection must be corrected when the first re-inspection is conducted; and 2) payment of the
first invoice that is sent to the property owner must be postmarked by the due date indicated on
the invoice. Several Councilmembers had previously expressed an interest in establishing such
an incentive program. Estimated revenue loss for a 5% reduction will equal $28,840. However,
Fire expects to generate revenue in excess of FY 08-09 budgeted amounts to offset this
reduction.
5/14/2009
2
At the March 6th Mayor and Common Council meeting, Councilmember McCammack states
that owners of problem rental properties should be penalized for their lack of compliance with
the City's ordinances. Staff notes that non-compliant apartment owners are cited and subject to
fines, through the issuance of administrative citations, pursuant to Chapter 9.92 of the City's
Municipal Code. In FY 08-09 the Fire Department projects that $100,000 in citations will be
issued for Fire Code related violations.
Proposed new and amended ordinances are typically reviewed by the Legislative Review Committee
before being recommended to the Mayor and Council for approval. However, two new fees brought
before the Ways and Means Committee will require enabling ordinances, and draft versions of these
ordinances were presented to the Ways and Means Committee. At the request of the City Attorney's
Office, the City Manager's Office will request these draft ordinances be sent to the Legislative Review
Committee for review and possible modifications, before being brought back the Mayor and Common
Council for final approval.
. Code Enforcement is proposing a new fee for the removal of unauthorized signs. A new
ordinance would define the responsible party, provide a definition for an unauthorized sign, and
would designate the Code Enforcement Department as the responsible party for the
enforcement. Based on the cost to the City for administering the program, the new ordinance
could allow for the infraction amount to be set at $100 by the Master Fee Resolution. This fee
for service could be in addition to any administrative citations that may be issued pursuant to
Chapter 9.92 of the City's Municipal Code.
. Code Enforcement and the City Clerk's Office have worked together to propose a new yard
sale permit fee that will provide better regulation of yard sales. Currently, the City allows for
two yard sales each year, but does not have a system to track the number held each year at a
given property. An ordinance amendment could allow for the yard sales to be tracked by the
City Clerk's Office through a permit process, and enforced by Code Enforcement through the
issuance of administrative citations pursuant to Chapter 9.92 ofthe City's Municipal Code.
Most of the adjusted and new fees, with the exception of the unauthorized sign fee, yard sale permit
fee, and commercial parking fee, will be effective immediately upon the adoption of the resolution.
The California Government Code requires that all development related fees take effect no sooner than
60 days after their adoption, which would make those fees effective on July 18,2009.
The proposed master fee resolution incorporates the proposed and revised fees discussed in this staff
report. For the last several years, staff has been attempting to identify and repeal outdated fee
resolutions, and incorporate those fees into this master fee resolution as fees are modified, so that over
time most fees can be consolidated into a single document. For that reason, the master fee resolution
includes many other fees that remain unchanged. In order to help readily identify the fees that are
being modified or added, the changes are identified in strikethrough/italics. All other fees remain
unchanged.
5/1412009
3
Ways and Means Committee Review:
On March 4th and 11th, the Ways and Means Committee reviewed the proposed fee adjustments and
new fees. Based on the Committee's feedback, the following modifications have been made to staffs
original proposal:
. Investigation fees for requested stop signs, no parking signs and permit parking signs have been
removed.
. The new yard sale permit fee will take effect ninety (90) days after the enactment of the
enabling ordinance.
. New Development Services fees for more than 3 plan checks and more than 3 WQMP reviews
will only be assessed upon the authorization of the Director or Deputy Director of Development
Services.
Meetings with the Utility Companies:
On April 2nd and April 23rd, the representatives from the City Manager's Office and Development
Services met with Southern California Edison, AT&T, Verizon, and Southern California Gas Company
to discuss the City's proposed fees, specifically the blanket inspection fee and billing fee.
As a result of the meetings, the City has agreed to develop a dual permit system to avoid billing
confusion between the utility companies and their sub contractors. In addition, the City will also
define what work will or will not be subject to a blanket permit inspection fee for each utility
company. In general, the City will not charge a blanket permit inspection fee, as long as a lane closure
is not required.
On April 28th, the City sent letters to the utility companies summarizing the meetings.
Review by the City Attorney's Office:
After a preliminary review of the Master Fee Resolution by the City Attorney's Office, the City
Attorney's Office has drafted a clarifying ordinance to accompany the Master Fee Resolution. The
proposed ordinance will clarify the process for obtaining a permit to consume alcoholic beverages in a
park, and define those fees relative to the processing of information concerning liens.
Next Steps
Staff recommends the following time line for implementation of the new fee schedule. It is
recommended that the Mayor and Council act quickly so as to maximize the additional revenue to be
realized as a result of these changes:
May 18 - Public Hearing and first reading of one clarifying ordinance. At the conclusion of the public
hearing, the Mayor and Common Council may adopt the fee resolution. Most fees become effective
upon adoption of the resolution.
July 18 - Development fees will become effective
5/14/2009
4
Financial Impact:
The new and adjusted fees are projected to provide $740,000 in estimated additional annual revenue in
FY 2009-10.
Recommendation:
Adopt resolutions, lay clarifying ordinance over for final adoption, and send draft ordinances regarding
illegal signs and yard sales to the Legislative Review Committee for discussion and review.
5/14/2009
5
<
.....
=
~
e
-=
u
~
.....
<
0")
rn
'-
<8
o
'1"
V'l
"0
'" s::
== <Il
~ Q)
= ~
~ o~
U
'Co; ~
~=o;==
~ 0 == =
.5 :; = ~
~'C~~
~~ =:V'l
__.--0
~ ~ c:
'" ~ V)
~ ~
~ J.
J. ""
"" ~
.s~
'-' V'l
0\
~~:
-; CJ ,.......,
..... .;: 2 N
OJ......
Eo-< ~ '"
V1 0
U
= 8
= ~ 0
i3~N
~
=:
-
= 0
~ ~ 0
;~~
U
'C.__
.......~-~
'" ~ ~ 0
~'C~o
...:lC....N
~'-'
~
.....
~
"0
c..
~
~
~
~
l.
~
'"
~
"0
~
'"
o
c..
o
l.
~
~
-
E=: ~
~"'"
~ (1)
r- ~
Q)
u
::i
"0
(1)
'-
Q)
......
~
o
~.=
~ s::
~8
(;
E
02
<e:
:tt::
'-
rn
Q)
;>-',u
N [fJ
<Il ~
cB .~
o ~
~~
o
o
o
o.
'1"
o <Il
8 E
0" 02
...... 'E
V'l
'--00
8c:c:
v)V)N
N
'-'
V'l V'l V'l
0\ 0")
I~C""'!
...... N
N ......
V'l
V'l V'l V'l
800
oC:C:
00V)
I~N
V'l
V'l V'l V'l
ISo 0
OOC:
v) v) 0")
N ......
'-'
V'l V'l V'l
V'l
'1"............
00\0\
00\0\
N...... ......
~~
'r;; Z '-
s:: .....r Q)
(1) s::...s:::
,~ E 0
"2cQ)S::
<2.:eg;:
Q) (; i5.. '-
~ s:: Q) ~
1;l~~~
~~Vl~
o~ g ~ f-
....l(1)"",o(!
"0 ::!. Q) '-
~ l:: ~ Q)
B;::: ~ E
- Q) ,- ;>
<e:O....lO
000
'- '- '-
Ec"E
000
uuu
(;(;(;
E E E
'2 '2 02
<e:<e:<e:
N 0") '1"
o
o
o.
......
o
Z
(1)
...s:::
......
Vl
(1)
t;J
s::
:g
~
(;8
E o.
'2 V)
'E N
V'l
o
c:
o
o
......
00
V)C:
r'0
\0
V'l
V'l V'l
r-
<<:
00
0\
......
M r-
C:C:
00 0
N r-
......
V'l
V'l V'l
o
c:
o
V)
......
00
c:c:
00
NO
......
V'l
V'l V'l
o
c:
o
V)
V'l
00
V) 0
NO
...... '1"
V'l V'l
M
o
o
N
0") '1"
00
00
NN
I
Q)
Q) "0
"'" gf ~
5 :.a~
'r;; Vl ~ <
~:9 0 I
...s:::0C!l(1)
Q)o..;<: Q)
l5.. V) u "'"
,-,0.s::.85
s:: <e: rn Vl 'r;;
,9 ..;<: 15 ~ s::
,2 B ~ ::i ~
"0 Vl t;J 2:>, '-
.~ ~ Q) l::" 0.
5 .- '- rn 0.
-.....lCl....l<e:
o 00
'- '- '-
c co
000
U uu
(; (;(;
E E E
'2 '2'2
<e: <e:<e:
V)
\Or-
Q)
~
s::
o
'r;;
s::
Q)
...s:::
Q)
'-
0.
0.
rn
'-
Q)
'';:::
......
Q)
Z
Q)
~
s::
o
.~
o
"0
rn
'-
.~
......
o
~
......
Q)
...s:::
......
Vl
Q)
t;J
s::
:g
~
Vl
4-< Q)
o u
Vl .;:
...... '-
Vl Q)
o Vl
u s::
Q) o~
...s::: '-
...... rn
~ s::
:> 'C
o Q)
u~o
0:>V'l
.; ~ .~
Q) ...... Q)
Vl U ~
~ ~ s::
'- ...... Q)
us:::>
..s8~
'00
00
o. o.
V) ......
I '0
o
o.
V)
V'l
V'l V'l
V'l
V'l
V'l V'l
V'l
000
c:c:c:
ON V)
N N
oSOO
00C:C:
V)OV)N
:::::
V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l
r-0")0r-r-0")
C:~~(".j(".j~1
o '1" 0") r-r-'1"
r- N V) '1" '1" N
......
V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l
0000000
C:0C:C:C:C:C:
OOOOOV)N
O.........lIlMM..................
......
V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l
00
Oc:
V) V)
N N
V'l V'l V'l V'l
000
Oc:c:
000
'1" ...... ......
V'l V'l V'l
00
c:c:
o 00
00
'1"'1"\0'1"'1"......\0
000000\0
000000\0
NNNNN......N
"2
Q)
"0 t::
~ c ~'J ......
(1.) ~ ~ 'r:;;
...... U"O 0
~ "O~"Efr
:::J ~~~O
~ gfQ~g
Q) r"\ ~ .c .-
.... ~ .~ e e:: ~ ~
5 "0 c: ~ ~ 0 '<:)
'r;; ~ ~........ ~ g
~ 0 ~ 5 5 '';::: >
...s::: C!l .=: ,- .- s:: Vl
Q);;.,>-' ~ ~ rn (1)
C5.::":::::00~:O
Cl. rn .~ "0 "0 ~, rn
<e:o~<e:<e:v~
0000000
;..., ;..., l--o l--o l- '- l--o
ccc:cccc
o 0 0 0 000
uuuuuuu
(;(;(;(;(;(;(;
E E E E E E E
'2 '2 '2 '2 '2 '2 '2
<e:<e:<e:<e:<e:<e:<e:
000\;:
...... N
...... ......
0000
0000
00000
'1". ...... o. r-.
...... V) N
V'l V'l V'l V'l
0000
C:C:C:C:
V) V)O \0
......... ......... 0 00
......
V'l V'l V'l V'l
0\'1"00")
~V).........V)
l/l.........MOO
......... M 0 00
N...... ......
V'l V'l V'l V'l
0000
c:oc:c:
V)OOO
...... M 0 00
N...... ......
V'l V'l V'l V'l
10 10
c: c:
V) '1"
...... 0\
N
V'l V'l V'l V'l
~oo~\O
>.Ll8>.Llg::
ZNZ......
Q) Q)
~ ~
o~ G- G-
'r;; ~ ~
(1)"0"0 "0
Q) ~ ~ ~
.....c ~ ~
(1) 0 4-< 4-<
Q)Vl...s:::O 0
~rn......
.~ ~ ~ 8 ~ .(1)_u
E ^" S::'';::: ......
'- ..... :::J 0'2 0
~~4-<Z~Z
.....004-<'-4-<
Q)f- o~o
(;<1)rn<1)<8Q)
Vlu6~o~
"E:.aE~:::~
<Il Q) Q) Q) ::l Q)
>->~~'-'~
..;<:
'-
Q)
[)
.f'
u
--
Q) (1) Q) (1) Q)
"O"O'C"O "0
o 0 0 0 0
uuuu u
0") '1" V) \0
......... -................
(1)
'-
o
E
...s:::
......
.~
~ .8 '2
-"O~
0.(1)-
E 0/) rn
o s:: 5
U <Il._
fJfJ::a
rn(1)"O
Q) .0 rn
'- ...s:::
<8 o~ g
(1) (1)
<B .~ ;...,
(1) s:: <8
Vl ~ (1)
2'1"~
(1) s:: (1)
...s:::<Il...s:::
f- -S f- .~
o
o
\0
00
V'l
M
V)
00
00
......
V'l
o
c:
o
00
......
V'l
o
o
'1"
0\
V'l
\0
0\
0\
......
,-,
V)
0"':
oor-
......V'l
V'l::'
,-,
(1)
:>
o
~
"0
s::
rn
Vl
......
'2
~
V)
'-'
"0
Q)
0/)
s::
rn
...s:::
U
s::
~
s::
'(;l
E
(1)
'-
o
o
00
00.
N
V'l
o
c:
o
N
V'l
0")
<<:
\0
......
......
V'l
o
c:
V)
......
......
V'l
o
c:
V)
0\
V'l
\0
0\
0\
......
e
(1)
0.
o
~~Q..
:> ~ rn
'C E ......
0.Q)~
.... ~.~
<8.0 0/)
Q) rn rn
~ gf ~
~:.a:;
.~ ::J ~
.j:: .0 .-
.~ ;>, gf
s:: t:: ._
.- Q) ~
E 0."5
"0 0 Vl
<e: l5.. ~
(1)
"0
o
U
r-
o
o
,')
.,;
"1"
......
V'l
o
o
V)
00
V'l
o
<<:
\0
0\
V'l
o
c:
V)
0\
V'l
o
c:
o
......
V'l
\0
0\
0\
......
"0
s::
<Il
E
Q)
0,-,
'-' Vl
Il) I::
0/)<1)
a:.J
...s:::4-<
U 0
Q) Vl
:> ~
.~ !S
.j::VJ
Vl I
'2 ~
'E (1)
'Ct::
<e:~
Il)
u
IE
o
_<fJ
....
Il)
~
80"-
~g
>-.~
~"1"
0;n
Q)
"0
o
U
00
......
<
.....
=
Q,l
E
..c
c.J
~
.....
<
'0 -= Il.l
~ C -= =
~ 0 = c
,5 ;e c ~
~'O~1l.l
~~ p::
eJ', M
.-:: 0; 0'1
-=~CooN
..... 'S: e N 0
o .......... .......
Eo-< Il.l '"
rJJ 0
u
'0___
......~I.\O\O
:.g~~~
...:l c..... - -
;;l"-'
'"
.....
C
Il.l
C
C
o
U
00
00
'<t"~
N N
M
V'l V'l
...........-...00
Il.l~~tr)
"'~ooo
~ Il.l 00
~ l-
.... ....
C Il.l
.....Q
"-' V'l V'l
V'l V'l
s ~~
Cll.looO
8~N:=
Il.l
p::
V'l V'l
.....
coo
Il.l Il.l ~ tr)
l- Il.l
;~~:::;
U V'lV'l
o
o
o
'<t"
\0
-
0'0 0
tr)0tr)
l'-~M
-
I::::
V'l
0000
0000
\000-
~N"'N""-
eJ',
V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l
o
~
tr)
\0
-
0000000
~~~~~~~
eJ',MMtr)MeJ',O
eJ',tr)'<tool'-tr)N
tr)
V'l
V'l V'l V'l V'l V'l GA GA
o
00
l'-
l'-
N
GA
o
~
tr)
l'-
N
GA
o
~
o
-
-
GA
\0
eJ',
eJ',
-
OMMNMtr)tr)
~ooo;<':~C"!~
eJ',MMtr)MeJ',O
eJ',tr)'<tool'-tr)N
tr)
GA GA GA GA GA GA GA
0000000
~~~~~~~
eJ',MMtr)MeJ',O
eJ',tr)'<tOOl'-tr)N
tr)
V'l GA V'l V'l GA GA GA
I , I I I I I
GA GA GA GA GA GA GA
~~~~~~~
'-"l'-"l'-"l'-"l'-"l'-"l'-"l
zzzzzzz
o
tr)
N
0000
tr)ooo
\0-00
l'-" N
N
GA
GA V'l V'l GA
U
>
U
E
.....
Q)
en
en
Q)
~
~
:.g
.....
~
~
o
~
eJ',
tr)
00000000000000000
~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~
l'-l'-MeJ',tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)
MeJ','<ttr)
- -
GA
GAV'lGAGAGAGAGAGAGAV'lGAGAGAGAGAGAGA
tr)
C"!
eJ',
tr)
eJ', M '<t tr)
<':""':~~
l'-l'-MeJ',
MeJ','<ttr)
- -
GA
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
V'lGAV'lGA=============
o
~
eJ',
tr)
00000000000000000
~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~
l'-l'-MeJ',ooooooOtr)oOtr)oo
MeJ','<ttr)'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t
- -
I I I
V'lGAV'lV'lV'lV'lGAV'lGAV'lGAGAGAGAGAGAGA
GA
0000000000000
'~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)tr)0tr)tr)0tr)tr)
MMMMMMM'<tMM'<tMM
GAGAGAGAV'lGAGAGAGAGAGAGAV'lGAV'lGAGA
GA
~
'-"l
Z
~~~~oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"0 "0
Q) ~ Cl)
~~ Cl)
,~~ ~
~ bJ) 0
.- <+-0..... ~
Eo-<o1J Cl)
~ ~ U ~
~ ~ Cl) Cl)
Q) ~ ,.-",~
~ 'tti ~ ~
Q)~a3~
,~:5 ~:5
a.E~E
;:l "0..0 "0..0
o<r:<r:<r:<r:
en
~
Cl)
en 'S:
"0 Q)
.....l p::: '~
..... e... t::
~ ~ Cl)
u~e...
~~
15M
..... C
c ro
Cl)...c
Ef-<
Cl) Cl)
~ ~
::E
"0
C
o
~ en
en 15 e... ~ 15
~Cl)'~'oC~ ~15l
O~~~'B~ ~'~.5
CC"'t;::Cl)f-< ~""'l::O
~ c .$.,8 (1) '- ~ ~
~O" "p:::t::enro ""UCl)
'00 ~ V ~ c ~ ~ C
] C M ;; ~ U - 0 <+-0 'C;;
- Cl) C ~..... ~~ B 0 ;:l
~t<roCOCuC ~~~
-... '-"l ...c :: ~ e ~ ,!2 Cl) .... W rJJ
f-< ~ ~ 8. i5. t) en ,!2 ~ '-"l
~ ] ..0 ~ 8 ~] '~ ':e ~
::E~~f-<OE~~uZ
QJ
.....
~
'"0
Q..
~
QJ
QJ
~
""
QJ
rIl
~
'"0
QJ
rIl
o
Q..
o
""
~
:ti:
~
Il.l
Q
Q) Cl)
"0 "0
o 0
uu
eJ', 0
- N
Cl)
"0
o
U
-
N
o .....
..0 E
E .....
o Cl)
Ue...
r./') tI) tI'l tr.I Ui tI) rn
Q) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl)
u u u u u u u
'S: 'S; 'S; 'S: 'S; 'S: ';;
"'"" "'"" l-o ;.... "'"" .... ....
Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl)
rJJr./:JrJJrJJr./:Jr./:Jr./:J
;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;;
Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl)
OOOClOClO
NM'<ttr)\Ol'-oo
NNNNNNN
:D
.....
en a>G:D ~
~ ~ ~~ 5 :2
-5 ~ 1;;0 u ~
2Cl)Cl) ~j, [;Cl) .....~"
roE~ ~-"'Cl)~,15 ~>.
B ,- '0 Cl),~ g ~ N .t:: ~
Cl) ':' ~ C...c i5. OJ: ,- en 0;
u~ro O~enc~ C I
~ ~ ~ bfl e.. "0 ,- .;t::' 0 OIl
~ ~ ~ ~.5 v 3 ~ ~ .= .5
Cl) : 'I: ,:: ~ C ;g g..o ~ ~
~ C C ;? ~ ~ ~ .~ Cl) C Cl) ro
~ Cl) 0 ,_ OJ. ro _ ~ ,- ..... ,- ..0 ..... c..
OJ: E OJ: ~ ,5 0. Q) C ~ ~ OJ: 5 Cl)"O
C ':e ,5 g ~ ~ = ,- "9 ,- ,5 U U 2 .....
:.= Cl) > g ~ ro -g C E ~ "0 :.a 'E ~
:-= > .g 0 _ C ~ 0 0 0 ~ Q) Q) ,_ .....
~O"",Z~<r:e.......lZNe...P:::>....l1;;
en
Cl)
U
';;
.....
Cl)
r./:J
;;;
Q)
Cl
CI) V'J en rJj
Cl) Q) Cl) Cl)
u u u u
';; ';; ';; ';;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ .~ ~ .~ ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 'g '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0
OOOO~~~~~~~~~~~~~
eJ',
N
O-NM
M M M M
N
00
~~
tr) tr)
V'l V'l
ro ro
==
00
~~
00
'<t'<t
V'l V'l
00
~~
tr) tr)
M M
V'l V'l
00 00
00
00
N N
en
...
;:l
o
...c
2~
- ...
ro Q)
C >
,_ 0
~ ~
:.g:.g
..... .....
ro ro
e...e...
Q)
u
15
o
en en
Cl) Q)
;g;g
'0 '0
ro ro
~~
en
-....
Q)
bJl
'"
@O\
~g
;>,~
5~
<
-
=
Q,j
=
-=
<:J
~
-
<
a:l '; Q,l
- = ~ ::I
~ 0 ::I =
.=- ;::: = Q,l
.- = >
~::g<Q,l
~< ~
__ ~O
Q,l ~ ~
~ ~ V)
Q,l Q,l 0\
100 100 ......
... ...
= Q,l
....~
'-' V7
;::
'; ~ =
-';: e
o 100 _
Eo-< Q,l '"
rJJ 0
U ~
-c
"1:l~
_ Q,l 100 00
'" ~ ~ 0
~"1:lQ,l0
...J Q..;;" N
~'-'
'"
-
=
Q,l
e
e
o
u
e ~
e Q,l 0
o Q,l \0
...ro.N
Q,l
~
-
= 0
Q,l Q,l ~
100 Q,l V)
:: ro. \0
U V7
000000000000000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O
V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V)
V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c
000000000000000
~~~~OO~~~O~~~~O
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOV)
'i"'i"'i"'i"'i"t-'i"'i"'i"'i"'i"'i"'i"'i"V)
......
V7
V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7
000000000000000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O
V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V)V)V)V)O
MMMMM\OMMMMMMMMV)
......
V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7V7
000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000
000000000000000
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
""t:1 ~ 'U
v v =
13 5 ::I
.- 'm 0
..<:: CIl-U Q)
o .- 0 $::; en
~o: E;5.~ 5
~~ ~8~ 8
~ ~ ~.~. I I:)J CI
ro. > ~ ~ ~.:: .::
<tl J2 J2 J2 'g ~
.- ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
~ ~8.~~~
E~___CIl"
c:: ._ ._ ._ ~ ~
E J2 E E = v .-
o ~ ~ ~ ti ~ .5
UQ...Q...Q...Q...CI:J...:I
Q,j
-
~
"0
Q..
~
Q,j
Q,j
~
;..
Q,j
'"
~
"0
Q,j
'"
o
Q..
o
;..
p..
::t:l:
-a
Q,l
~ CIl
:€
'(3
~
"'"
cf1 en C/'} r./) en cn tJ:I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :€
'(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
<tl
:8
CIl
~
E-<
CIl
E~ .l!]"O2:l
CIl ::I.::: 0 ~.....
~~::;:a~ =~1::
~~~E8..l!]5~~
.....::1 CI:J _ 0 :8 .- ::;
v ~ CIloo(:O V7. 1"0 u
u"O"O'i"CI:J~~CIl->,
.;:: v v d) k. CIl .- g E ~
- > > > C I+-< ~ .- ..... -
v 0 0 0 ,_ 4-< ..... - ~ 0-
> S. 0. ~ ~ 0 g d) .....~
"2EE=~=->o"O
= ,_ .- J2 -'- ~ 0 z 0
o = :5 ..... "0 ~ ,!: 0( I ~
-g::J g:.~ ~ ,~ .:: \0 S
~ vi E> E..... 5~\O::
..0 (1) 0 ,_ 0 "'" ~ :::; ~
<~U~...:I"",~Q........"'"
CIl CIl
(1) (1)
:-2 ~
'u '0
~ ~
""''''''
en U') r./) cn V) en
(1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
:-8 ;g ;g :-2 :-8 ;g
'(3 'u 'u 'u u '(3
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
""''''''''''''''''''''''''''
(1)
~
Ci5
..<::
-
'~
4-0
o
4-0 .....
o v
.......0
.8 E 1::
U::l (1)
V = ....
....._ CIl
is E 'm
>,0 5vi
..o~ u=
"2 0 ~ .~
:9"2 c 03
6~~:;;CIl
0.. ..0. . 5iJ ~ ~
(1) ~ CIl ="0
(;j ,- = ~ =
E'';:: 0 "'5 ~
'';:: '0 ~ OJ ~
~ ~ '13 ~ "2
o I
o
O.
o
M
V7
0000000
~~~~~~~
V) V) V) V) V) V) V)
V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-c-c-c-c-c-c-c-c
00000
~~o~~
000V)V)
'i"'i"'i"oooo
M M
00
~~
00 CIl
0\0\5
'C
~
>
V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7
000
~~~
V) V) V)
M M M
V7 '-'" V7
OOOOCll
~~~~5
o 0 V) V) 'C
;'g;'g0000~
V7'-"'V7V7>
0000000000000000
00000000
00000000
NNNNNNNN
CIl
=
.g
.~
;::
CIl
<tl ~
.~ '0
CIl =
o 0
::c: .~
~o
Ci5>
= =
o 0
:t::::t:::
~ ~
Q...Q...
~
J2
.....
g
..0 b! =
::; = ~
u'- $-.0
~ g
E ~
o _"0
<.t::=~
Oo~~
- ~.~
= ...."0
] "2 ~
~ -'-
(1)..o~
..... ~ U
o CIl 0
:8iSi:O
CIl
=
V) 0
~ .~
]]
,';:: >
~ OIl
1:: .::
(1) ~ ~
~~8:
...:1..<::
~ ~ .s
._ ._ 0
"",,,,,,E-<
cn tI') cn (/) cn en C/) cn
Q) Q) 0) (1) .~ .~ Q) d)
:-2 ;g ;g ;g ~ ;E ~ ;g
'(3 '0 '0 '0 '0 'u '(3 '0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
""''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
.....
o
\0
(1)
.....
- ~
0., gp U
(1) 'm "0
~ ~ ~
Uu "0
12 :.J ~
o~ ai
~.-::: I
:: =
Ee-"2<tl
~ ~ .g '-@
$-.0 u OJ -
~:9~:9~E
~:.aCll~~~
...:Iu.5~<2~
V7
~
M
~
N
\0
......
'-'
V7
o
~
o
V)
V7
M
~
N
..-
N
V7
00
o
o
N
'i"
v
.....
~
'i"
M
(1)
~
....
CI:J
..<::
-
.~
CIl
.....
(1)
=
~
o
-
=
~
0-
E
o
U
.....
<8
=
o
'';:::
U
::I
"0
(1)
.....
(1)
::0
'm
CIl
o
Q...
M
-
=
2
CIl
'm
=
o vi
U =
(1) 0
..o'~
0-
.... 2,
"0 Qj
~.....
="0
~ =
..<:: ~
U CIl
(1) V
(1)3
"'" .....
I
~
o
o
0\.
00
N
'-'
V7
V7
~
M
~
N
\0
......
'-'
CIl
(1)
'f;3
>
V7
o
~
o
V)
CIl
::I
o
'C
~
>
V7
M
o
N
......
N
V7
CIl
::I
o
'C
~
>
00
o
o
N
~
~
Z
CIl
,::
CIl
::I
o
::c:
b
'E
~
"'"
(1)
.....
~
(1)
.....
~
<>
u
E
o
CIl
.....
<>
00
(\l
~g;
::Eo
c!:::l
u~
V)
M
-<
-
=
ClI
e
-=
~
eo:
-
~
I!)
~
.....
VJ
..c
....
.~
"E
'" B
- '"
= .u)
QJ C
S 0
S u c
o I!) 0
U .D '.g
B~
-0 Ci)
I!) I!)
;> ....
0-0
E C
I!) o:l
.... '"
I!) I!)
I!) 3
>.1-. ....
I
"'0 -; QJ
~=-;=
eo: 0 = =
.5 :; = ~
~ "'0 ~ QJ .~
~~ ~~
.--.
QJ~~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ :!
C.J~~
.5t::1
'-" "'"
-
~ ~.c
-'S: e
o ~ _
~ QJ '"
rn8
e
e QJ
o QJ
...~
QJ
~
"'"
-
= 00
~II)V)
~QJ-
=~'1"
U ~
"'0.-.
......~I.OO
"'';eo:o
eo: "'0 11)0
...J c..... N
;;;;J'-"
000
V) 0 0
v;,r-r-
V)
M
"'" "'" "'"
000
~~o
V)r-M
_ '1" V)
"'" "'" "'"
- '1" 0\
O\V)-
O'1"M
M - V)
N
"'" "'" "'"
000
~oo
Or--:M
M '1" V)
N
"'" "'" "'"
o
~
V)
-
N
"'" "'" "'"
oo~~
OL.l.lL.l.l
~zz
___ .D
I!) o:l
u ......l
= I!) Ci)
'1" o:l I!) .5
_ a ~ Jo-.4
I Q) Q) .;
~i~~] ~
...... u .= '..- Q)
~ >>>.1-. ~~oo
II) o:l"@ t;2UU
~ 0 =:l .5 .~ c c
>>21!)..c00
:-;:<t:u>~~
E'-"= e.c.8
o:lc~-oo:l~c
>.1-.l!)l!)cbCi)o:l
Q);""+-i='oot:)
Ci)::s!.5 ~ .... .... .-
.....- o:l '=" 0 0 '"
jO:E]ff~
ClI
-
~
"0
Q..
~
ClI
ClI
~
;..
ClI
'"
~
"0
ClI
'"
o
Q..
o
;..
~
~
II)
t::I
=1t:
I!)
.=
>.1-.
I!) I!) I!)
~ ~.~
o 00
~~~
\0 r- 00
M M M
'0
o
r-
"'"
00
~~
o 0\
N -
"'" "'"
V) V)
r-o;
N 0\
N -
"'" "'"
00
~~
o 0\
N -
"'" "'"
"'" "'"
~~
L.I.lL.l.l
ZZ
'"
I!)
I!)
>.1-.
~
o
I
.~
VJ
c
.9
~
.....
iJ
u
~
"-
o:l
....
E--<
I!) I!) I!) E
V".J {j'J IJJ &3
~~~ ~~~~
Q) Q) .~_ .!E. ~ CT
.~] g. E ~ ..c .2
aJ c ~ aJ x.5 =
c...c =:l 0..'- C '"
f b.OU'J I r/l..s::"O
c =:l-o c-o Ci)S
o 0 C 0 C 'v
c..2o:l Co:l5-;S
..c-..c ..c..c....C.-.
t..c...... "'g~-;S~~
g~~.-.O>.1-...cr"M
<;::;>.1-.E--<~<;::; ."E;:::S~
..c . ._..col!)~
~G)o"'" ~o ~;; E
Or-O\'-"ONVJ""'....
l:ee3~e^~~
:::EEc:::EoE
~iiliil~~iil~iil~
~"@"@"@~"@~"@;zj
o
o
0\.
00
N
"'"
"'"
o
~
V)
N
o
~
o
o
"'"
"'"
0\
-
'<:!;
o
-
N
N
0\
"'"
"'"
o
~
V)
r-
o
~
o
o
N
"'"
"'"
I I
o
~
o
V)
"'"
o
o
o
o
-
"'"
'1"
o
o
N
'1"
o
o
N
C
o
I!)
u
C
I!)
-0
.;;
L.I.l
I!)
;>
.~
.~
'"
I!)
;>
.5
-0
I!)
-0
....
o
~o
~U
E
....
o:l
<
C
o:l
co
....
=
~
I!)
'"
"@
>.1-.
E
o:l
<
C
I!)
.D
.D
o
~
I!)
'"
"@
>.1-.
I!) I!)
.~ .~
00
~~
0\ 0
M '1"
I!)
.~
o
~
I!)
.~
o
~
N
'1"
-
'1"
00
00
N. -
N N
"'" "'"
00
~~
V) 0
_ V)
N
"'" "'"
V) N
oo~
V) -
.- -
r- -
"'" "'"
00
~~
V) 0
- 0
r- -
"'" "'"
00
00
00
o V)
V)
"'" "'"
\0 \0
00
00
NN
I!)"@
I!) ....
>.1-. I!)
~~
C ......l
.~ ~
~~
o:l'-
.... 0
B C
j .9 0(
...... C
.... u .~_
I!) I!)
::: ~ o:l
~.5u
'" '"
I!) I!)
u u
.;; .;;
.... ....
I!) I!)
VJVJ
~ .~
.D::i3
= =:l
~~
M '1"
'1"'1"
<1'
o
""
o
Q
.....
r-
Vi
b
-;
=
=
=
~
II)
=
=
II)
>
QJ
~
~
QJ
=
-;
-
o
~
I!)
u
tE
o
C/l
-....
I!)
on
cO
[;ig;
:::80
;>-,!::::,
5~
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Altered License Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Date
4/21/2009
The fee to license an altered dog for 1 year will be increased from $15 to $20. Licenses for 2 years will be increased from $25 to
$30 and licenses for 3 years will be increased from $35 to $40.
Personnel Costs ..\'.., Ji.... ....... ..,i' ,:.<': ...!~t._.9.{;if,... :.X." . fit.."... ;....',..
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Animal License Supervisor 20.79 8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.2 6.50
License Checker 11 0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.5 6.33
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 12.82
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
License T aa 0.35 1 0.35
Door HanQer 0.1 1 0.1
Cash Receiot 0.1 1 0.1
Postaae 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.89
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Computer Eauipment & Software 4.00 1 4.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 4.00
C
t P
dF
ompansons 0 ropose ee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 15.00 (5.00 -33.33%
Moreno Valley 10.00 - (10.00 -100.0%
Riverside County 8.00 (12.00 -150.0%
OOJ
Total Service Direct Cost 18.71
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@13,21% 2.47
Total Service CosVUnit 21.19
Recommended Fee 20.00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 1.19
Current Fee Amount 15.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) 5.00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Account
4320
User Fee Description
Altered License Fee Refund
Date
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the refund amount from $25 to $50 that an pet owner can be refunded for spaying or neutering their
dog within 60 days of purchasing an unaltered pet license.
Personnel Costs ~":'f.:')."''. .,<'),;i;':/>;".
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Pos~ion per Un~ Cost per
NA
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quanmy Required Un~ Cost
NA
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit\ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quant~y Required Un~ Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
This is not an additional fee but a reduction
T alai Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rale@13.21%
T alai Service CosVUnit
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
OOL
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Animal Control Department 124 4430 Delinquency Penalty (Licensing) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the penalty added to the cost of the pet license for failure to license from $15 to $20
Personnel Costs :.:;"f\{i/:">'(' ..,".,.} .'Q .."..,,:,'~
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Animal License Supervisor 20.79 8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.4 13.00
License Checker 11 0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.4 5.06
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 18.06
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Cash Receipt 0.1 1 0.1
Postage 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.44
ther osts (EQuipment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
o C
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 15.00 (5.00) -33.33%
Moreno Valley 18.00 (2.00) -11.1%
Riverside County 8.00 (12.00) -150.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
18.90
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 13.21%
Total Service CosVUnit
2.50
21 39
Fee Increase (Decrease)
2000
1.39
15.00
500
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
00:)
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Replacement &Transfer Ta
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Increases the "additional tag issued to replace a lost, stolen misplaced or damaged tag" from $3 to $5
Increases the "transfer of ownership of a licensed dog to a new owner in lieu of a fee for new license" from $3 to $5
Increases the "transfer of a current license from another jurisdiction" from $3 to $5
Personnel Costs IW:i'~'!\/<(<4[' ~"""s' ," .;.:y;;,,'
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Animal License Supervisor 20.79 8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.2 6.50
License Checker 11 0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.2 2.53
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 9.03
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
License Tag 0.25 1 0.25
Door Hanger 0.1 1 0.1
Cash Receipt 0.1 1 0.1
Postage 0.41 2 0.82
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.77
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 5.00 - 0.00%
Moreno Vallev 3.00 (2.00) -66.7%
Riverside County 2.00 (3.00) -150.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
10.80
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 13.21%
Total Service Cost/Unit
1.43
1/23
Fee Increase (Decrease)
500
723
300
? 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
004
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Fund
Date
Animal Control
124
4759
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the livestock (over 5001bs) apprehension fee from $50 to $150
Position
Animal Control Supervisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re IDips
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labo
Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost pe
26.32 9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57 0.4 15.83
18.95 7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83 1 28.83
17.17 6.85 24.02 2.402 26.42 0.4 10.57
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 55.23
Personnel Costs
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
VehiclelF uel/Maintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio Equipment/Maintenance 5 1 5.00
Specialized HaulinQ Eauipment 100 1 100.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 120.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 100.00 (50.00) -50.00%
Moreno Valley 75.00 (75.00' -100.0%
Riverside County 90.00 (60.00) -66.7%
,
Total Service Direct Cost
175.23
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 13.21%
Total Service CosVUnit
23.15
198 37
Fee Increase (Decrease)
1 fiO 00
4837
5000
1 00 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
005
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Lar e Livestock Board
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the large livestock daily board fee from $12.50 to $20.00
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Su erviso
Animal Shelter Attendant
Straight Time
Labor
21.47
16.25
Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43 0.2 6.69
6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18 0.4 10.07
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 8 1 8.00
8.00
Other Costs IEauiDment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 15.00 5.00 -33.33%
Moreno Vallev 11.00 9.00 -81.8%
Riverside County 15.00 5.00 -33.3%
Total Service Direct Cost 24.76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 13.21% 3.27
Total Service CosVUnit ?R O:l
Recommended Fee ?O 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 803
Current Fee Amount 1250
Fee Increase (Decrease) 750
006
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Apprehension Fee
Date
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This eliminates the two tier Apprehension Fee for altered and unaltered pets and establishes a single fee of $100 for the first
apprehension, $200 for the second and $350 for the third
Personnel Costs :X'<" "" :;;'\")L"',tI~1 i
Straight Time Fringe T olal Direct Dept or Div, Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor!
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost perl
Animal Control Supervisor 26.32 9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57 0.4 15.83
Animal Control Officer 18.95 7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83 1 28.83
Customer Service Rep/Dips 17.17 6,85 24.02 2.402 26.42 0.4 10.57
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 55.23
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Un~ Cost
Veh icle/F uel/Maintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio Equioment/Maintenance 5 1 5.00
Animal Care/Disposal 75 1 75.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 95.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitl rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 80.00 (20.00) -25.00%
Moreno Vallev 50.00 (50.00 -100.0%
Riverside County 35.00 (65.00 -185.7%
Total Service Direct Cost 150.23
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 13,21% 19.84
Total Service CosUUnit 170.07
Recommended Fee 100.00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 70.07
Current Fee Amount varies
Fee Increase (Decrease) varies
001
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Board Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the daily board fee from $8.00 to $10.00
Personnel Costs ''': ';:".:;(, ,;' '''''''::''+'",',
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dep\. or Div, Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr, Position per Un~ Cost per
Animal Shelter Kennel Supervisor 21.47 8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43 0.2 6.69
Animal Shelter Attendant 16.25 6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18 0.4 10.07
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.00
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
P
omparlsons to roposed Fee
More (Less ) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 9.00 (1.00) -11.11%
Moreno Vallev 6.00 (4.00) -66.7%
Riverside County 15.00 5.00 33.3%
Total Service Direct Cost
21.76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 13.21 %
Total Service CosUUnit
2.87
'4 63
Fee Increase (Decrease)
1000
1463
800
'00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
aop
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Pick-U Service Char
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the fee charged for pick-up services from $25.00 to $50.00
Personnel Costs .", _rei ','l;:";~">.'.;.
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Animal Control Supervisor 26.32 9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57 0.2 7.91
Animal Control Officer 18.95 7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83 0.5 14.42
Customer Service ReplDips 17.17 6.85 24.02 2.402 26.42 0.2 5.28
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 27.61
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle/Fuel/Maintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio Eauipment/Maintenance 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.00
Other Costs (EQuipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Total Service Direct Cost
47.61
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino County
Moreno Vallev
Riverside County
Fee Der Unit
varies
varies
varies
Dollars
varies
varies
varies
Percentage
varies
varies
varies
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 13.21%
Total Service CosVUnit
6.29
!'i~ 90
Current Fee Amount
!'i000
390
2500
?!'i00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
OO~j
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Ado tion Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This creates a single adoption fee of $30.00
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $25 to $30 for each dog or cat
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $40 to $30 for each puppy or kitten
Personnel Costs ',(', Ul.~~' . > ,', ,".,t>:idJ ~"(~;
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosIIHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Animal Shelter Kennel Supervisor 21.47 8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43 0.2 6.69
Animal Shelter Attendant 16.25 6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18 0.4 10.07
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 5 25.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 25.00
Other Costs (Eauicment, facilit rental, cart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comcarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less ) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 20.00 (10.00 -50.00%
Moreno Vallev 30.00 - 0.0%
Riverside Countv 75.00 45.00 60.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
41.76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 13.21%
Total Service CosVUnit
5.52
47 ?7
Current Fee Amount
:moo
1727
varies
V::lriAS
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
010
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Quarantine Dail Board
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the quarantine daily board fee from $10.00 to $15.00
Personnel Costs ,(, <J ,-/;,::1,':: ,i.i; ','<iI. ';':,he:,'!" .i,.
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div, Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Uni Cost per
Animal Shelter Kennel Superviso 21.47 8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43 0.2 6.69
Animal Shelter Attendant 16.25 6.64 22,89 2.289 25.18 0.4 10.07
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5,00
Other Costs (EauiDment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to ProDosed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino CountY
Moreno Vallev
Riverside County
Fee per Unit
9.00
6.00
15.00
More (Less) than SIB.
Dollars Percentage
1.00 11.11%
4.00 66.7%
(5.00) -33.3%
Total Service Direct Cost 21.76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 13,21% 2.87
Total Service CosVUnlt 74 63
Recommended Fee 1500
Recommended Fee Subsidy 963
Current Fee Amount 1000
Fee Increase (Decrease) 500
011
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Rabies Vaccination Deposit
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The rabies vaccination will be increased by $2 to cover the cost the contracted veterinarians charge to the City.
Personnel Costs .A/"t's "i.':, ,;.,,' },'",..'".' "",,~,,'!';.
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total l.abor
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
NA
Material & Rental Costs
Description
Cost Each
Quantity Required
Unit Cost
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
THIS IS A DEPOSIT ONLY
,
012
Total Service Direct Cost 0.00
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@ 13.21% 0.00
Total Service CostlUnit 000
Recommended Fee 000
Recommended Fee Subsidy 000
Current Fee Amount 000
Fee Increase (Decrease) 000
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
City Clerk 001 4901 Yard Sale Permit Fee (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Nominal fee for issuance of yard sale permit
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benems Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Business Reg. Reoresentative 20.72 6.22 26.94 2.6936 29.63 0.467 13.84
0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 13.84
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
0
0
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comparisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Permit Fee Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino n/a nla
Redlands 2.50 (12.50 -83.3%
Ontario 3.00 (12.00 -80.0%
Fontana 8.00 (7.00 -46.7%
Yucaioa 2.50 (12.50 -83.3%
o 1 ~.~
T ota! Service Direct Cost 1384
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 11.93% 1.65
Total Service Cost/Unit 1!'i 49
Recommended Fee 1!'i 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 049
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) 1!'i 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Code Enforcement 001 4743 Vehicle Tow Release Fees 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. This fee was first adopted by Code Enforcement in 2008 to mirror the fee charged by
the Police Department for the same service. CVC 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as GTA are
not charaed and can obtain a release 7 days a week 8am-7om. All other releases can be obtained M-F 7:30-5:30 om. The current
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Code Comoliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Sr.lSuo Officer 57.03 17.11 74.14 7.4139 81.55 0.25 20.39
Code Enf. Processina Asst 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 1 29.66
Admin. Svcs. Super. 34.15 10.245 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.25 $12.21
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 159.92
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Photos $2.00 4 $8.00
Reaular Mailinas 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 8.84
Other Costs lEauiDment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle Exoense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 40.00
Comparisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino n/a n/a
Total Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.91%
Total Service CosVUnit
208 76
22.78
?:l1 !'i4
Current Fee Amount
?:l000
1 !'i4
21500
1!'i 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
OllJ
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Deoartment/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Code Enforcement 001 4411 Removal of Unauthorized Signs (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Direct costs incurred for removal of unauthorized signs. Recommended fee is for removal per sign. If an ordinance amendment is
approved to remove the certified mail requirement, costs would be reduced by $5.21, but the $100 fee per sign would still be
liustified.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Code Compliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.4 19.53
Sr.lSup Officer 43.87 13.16 57.03 5.7031 62.73 0.2 12.55
Code Enf. Processina Asst 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 0.5 14.83
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 46.91
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Certified Mailings 5.21 1 5.21
Reaular Mailinas 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 6.05
Other Costs (Equipment, facili tv rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle Expense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 40.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino n/a n/a
Riverside 100.00 0.00 0.0%
Corona 80.00 (20.00) -20.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
9296
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.91%
Total Service Cost/Unit
10.14
1 OCl1 0
Recommended Fee Subsidy
10000
310
Recommended Fee
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
10000
01;::,
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Code Enforcement 001 4735 Release of Notice of Pendency Fee 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
A Notice of Pendency is a document that is recorded with the County Recorder's office to notify any potential buyer and/or lender
that there is some type of administrative action pending against the property and/or there is a lien against the property. This is an
administrative fee for releasing a notice of pendency for costs incurred. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries,
and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has not been updated in accordance with increases in salaries
and materials since 1996.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Code Compliance Officer II $34.15 $10.25 $44.40 $4.44 $48.83 2 $97.67
Code Compliance Proc. Asst. $20.74 $6.22 $26.96 $2.70 $29.66 2 $59.32
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $156.99
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
MailinQs $0.42 2 $0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.84
Other Costs (Equipment, facili tv rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
County Recorder Fee $13.00 1 $13.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 13.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
Not available
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
169 99
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.91%
Total Service CosUUnit
18.55
1 fIfI 53
Current Fee Amount
1 flO no
8.53
9400
fin no
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
016
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee DescriDtion Date
Administrative fee for private property building
Code Enforcement 001 4733 abatements resultinQ in a lien aQainst a property 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This $95 administrative fee is added to the total amount of the heanng costs when these costs have not been paid in the time given
to the property owner and the hearing order is processed. The total amount is then placed as a lien against the property. The
proposed fee modification is to reflect increases in salaries and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has
not been uodated in accordance with increases in salaries and materials since 1996.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe T olal Direcl Dept. or Div. T olal Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cosl Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Administrative Assistant $24.09 $7.23 $31.32 $3.13 $34.45 3 $103.35
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $103.35
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Mailings $0.42 2 $0.84
Printing/copies/receipts/reportl $0.10 7 $0.70
fax cover sheet/County Recorder)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.54
Other Costs (Eauipment, facili tv rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
C
P
omparlsons to roposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 120.00
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.91%
Total Service Cost/Unit
104 89
11.44
116 ~~
Current Fee Amount
11 fi 00
133
9500
2000
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
01'(
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733 Administrative fee for request for demand letter 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
When Code enforcement places a lien on a property, they file a Notice of Pendency with the County Auditor-Controller Recorder
(ACR). When an individual or company tries to buy, sell, refinance, etc they may be noticed by the ACR's Office the property may
show a lien. A demand letter is typically requested from an escrow company during the sale/transferlrefinance of property, which
details total amount owed to the City for liens, administrative citations or other charges pending against a property. Currently, the
City collects a $10 administrative fee for preparing a demand letter and $5 for each additional line item fee that includes abatement
costs, existing citations and hearing orders that have not yet been liened and a calculation of any interest owed on each of the debts.
Based on the average demand letter containing 5 additional line items ($5 for each item), for a total of approximately $35 per
demand letter. Updating these fees for personnel costs would bring the combined fee to $100 for the creation of a demand letter (no
charges for additional lines).
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.13 34 .45 2.5 86.13
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 86.13
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
PrintinQ Icopies/fax $0.10 7 $0.70
cover sheet)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.7
Other Costs (Eauipment, facili tv rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comparisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
Other jurisdictions do not Drel are demand letters.
Total Service Direct Cost
8683
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 10.91%
Total Service CosUUnit
9.47
9R::l0
Current Fee Amount
9!'i00
130
1000
R!'i 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
OlB
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733* Duplicate Release of Lien fee 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The $20 fee is an administrative fee for producing a Duplicate Release of Lien. This occurs when our department previously
complied with a request for a demand letter, the lien was paid through escrow, and a release was issued that was not recorded by
the party receiving the original release. The request must also be researched for additional fees owing and interest re-calculated.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Ovemead Labor CostIHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.1317 34.45 0.75 25.84
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 25.84
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
PrintinQ /copies/fax $0.10 -, 3 $0.30
cover sheet)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.3
Other Costs (Eauipment, facili v rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 30.00 0
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
2614
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 10.91%
Total Service CosUUnit
2.85
?fl 99
Current Fee Amount
?fl 00
099
2000
fl 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
* Account No. 001-000-4733 is used for building abatement fees
Account No. 001-000-4411 is used for administrative citation fees
GIS
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement
Code Enforcement 001 4815 liens on vacant lots 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement liens against properties whose owners have failed to pay the abatement costs for
vacant lots. There has been no fee increase since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries, and other
administrative costs associated with this nrocess.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 92.81
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Mailings 0.42 3 1.26
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.26
Other Costs (Eauipment, facili v rental, part-time labor wfo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino nfa nla
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
9281
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 10.91%
Total Service Cost/Unit
10.13
1 O? 93
Current Fee Amount
10000
293
1950
RO !'i0
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
02(:
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Administrative fee for weed abatement on vacant
Code Enforcement 001 4815 lots 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Administrative fee for weed abatement incurred costs and staff time for processing abatements. There has been no fee increase
since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time salaries, and other administrative costs associated with this process.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Laborl
Position Labor Benefrts Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Code Compliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 190.48
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Mailinas 0.42 5 2.1
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2.1
Other Costs (Equipment, facili ~ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle Expense 30 30.00 2.00 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 60.00
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nla nla
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.91%
250 48
Total Service Cost/Unit
27.33
?77 Rn
Current Fee Amount
?75 nn
280
11000
165 nn
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
OC") 1.
r..
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 188 4780 More than 3 WQMP Reviews (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, public safety, or adequate water quality best practices. The recommended fee is
$99.00 per hour. This represents review time for the NPDES Coordinator, the City Engineer, and the NPDES Customer
Service Rep.
Personnel Costs ....-,..,..""........ '/,.:."'"'!' if.."', ',j .;. "..<irl]
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div, Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
NPDES Customer Service Rep, 17.84 5.35 23.19 5.10224 28.29 0.5 14.15
NPDES Coordinator 37.68 11.30 48.98 10.77648 59.76 1 59.76
City Engineer 62.06 18.62 80.68 17.74916 98.43 0.05 4.92
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 78.83
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 99.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
Moreno Valley Preliminary) $ 321.00 3rd Review $ 222.00 224%
Moreno Valley Basic Final) $ 750.00 3rd Review $ 651.00 658%
Moreno Valley Standard Final) $1,440.00 3rd Review $ 1,341.00 1355%
Moreno Valley I Complex Final) $1,824.00 3rd Review $ 1,725.00 1742%
I
T
02~!
Total Service Direct Cost $ 78.83
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@21.01% $ 16.56
Total Service Cost/Unit 9) 9900
Recommended Fee 9) 9900
Recommended Fee Subsidy $
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) 9) 9900
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Development Services
Account
4351
User Fee Description
Blanket/Combo Permit (New Fee)
Date
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
A combo permit would combine the excavation permit ($45) and lane closure permit ($45) that contractors typically pull together.
The cost of the combined permit would be $53. The combo permit would allow the contractors to pull one permit saving the City
and contractors time. Development Services staff estimates there is a proposed revenue loss of $10.900. The blanket permit can
be issued to public utilities and combines the lane closure permit and the excavation permit into one permit. This fee covers the
time it takes counter personnel to enter the information into the computer and create the permit. A blanket permit may be issued
pursuant to Section 12.03.070(8) of the City Municipal Code for minor work and emergency work. That same section defines
minor work and emergency work. A blanket permit cannot be issued for work within arterial or collector roads. Minor andfor
emeraency work under a blanket permit may not exceed 16 sauare feet and is valid for 12 months from date of issuance.
Personnel Costs o,'.r:,.':v.> .........;.,y;.~ IiiI ......V.:'2:::!i.. i,'. "';,';t;,;;;\;
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 1 38.16
Engineering Assistant 1 26.58 7.97 34.55 7.60188 42.16 15% 6.32
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 44.48
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilitl rental, part-time labor wfo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less ) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee er Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 53.00 nfa nfa
Corona $ 80.00 $ 27.00 51%
Ontario $ 85.00 $ 32.00 60%
Redlands $ 216.00 $ 163.00 308%
Temecula $ 338.00 Annual $ 285.00 538%
Temecula $ 39.00 Monthly $ (14.00) -26%
Chino $ 177.00 $ 124.00 234%
02~)
Total Service Direct Cost $ 44.48
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@21.01% $ 9.35
Total Service CosVUnit $ 5383
Recommended Fee $ 5300
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 083
Current Fee Amount $
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 5300
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 4352 Permit Extension (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
There are circumstances when a contractor needs to extend the permit time frame; staff enters the extension request into
Permit Plus and verifies with the Construction Manager that the extension is warranted. The recommended fee is $43.00.
This is based on 0.2 hours of review time by the Construction Manager and documentation time by staff.
Personnel Costs I,,'" >Y'", )'";,"','?,?">" ;,'; "",i/,"',,' 'n L),']:
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.55 20.99
Engineering Assistant 1 26.58 7.97 34.55 7.60188 42.16 0.05 2.11
Construction/Survey Manaaer 41.64 12.49 54.13 11.90904 66.04 0.2 13.21
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 36.30
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit' rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
P
omparlsons to roposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 43.00
021}
Total Service Direct Cost $ 36.30
City-Wide Gen, & Admin.
Rate@21,01% $ 7.63
Total Service CosVUnit $ 4393
Recommended Fee $ 4300
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.93
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 4300
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 Various More than 3 Plan Checks (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, or public safety. The recommended fee is $85.00 per hour. This represents review
time for an Engineering Assistant III, the Senior Civil Engineer, the City Engineer, and the Development Services Tech.
The account will vary based on the type of plan being checked.
Personnel Costs I'>;; ',' <.'c'c.r.};; .,:....X.it~_ x'C'/ '.<1
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlH r. Position per Unit Cost per
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.1 3.82
EngineerinQ Assistant III 34.11 10.23 44.34 9.75546 54.10 1 54.10
Senior Civil Engineer 48.36 14.51 62.87 13.83096 76.70 0.1 7.67
City Engineer 62.06 18.62 80.68 17.74916 98.43 0.05 4.92
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 70.51
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (EQuipment, facilit' rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 85.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
Temecula $ 93.00 Per Sheet $ 8.00 $ 0.09
Moreno Valley (Maps) $ 190.00 Per Sheet $ 105.00 $ 1.24
Moreno Valley (Improvements) $ 248.00 Per Sheet $ 163.00 $ 1.92
Moreno Valley (Grading) $ 207.00 Per Sheet $ 122.00 $ 1.44
025
Total Service Direct Cost $ 70.51
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@21.01% $ 14.81
Total Service CosUUnit $ 8532
Recommended Fee $ 8500
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.32
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 8500
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 184 Account Blanket Inspection Fee ( New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to utility companies to inspect the work covered under the blanket permit, 16 square fee. The recommended
fee is $73.00. This is based on one hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II and .18 hours of a Construction
/Survey Manager's time. Not all cities have adopted a separate fee, it is included in the permit. The inspection typically
includes a morning inspection and an afternoon inspection
Personnel Costs <'s;"> - c,< . (ii""
,^,;
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Construction Inspector II 30.87 9.26 40.13 8.82882 48.96 1 48.96
Construction/Survey Manager 41.64 12.49 54.13 11.90904 66.04 0.18 11.89
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 60.85
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit' rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
t P
dF
omparlsons 0 ropose ee
More (Less ) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 73.00 N/A N/A
Corona Full Cost N/A N/A
Moreno Valley $ 15.00 Per Location $ (58.00) -0.79452055
Ontario Included in permit fee N/A N/A
Temecula $ 194.00 $ 121.00 166%
Chino $ 177.00 I $ 104.00 142%
02b
Total Service Direct Cost $ 60.85
City-Wide Gen, & Admin,
Rate@21.01% $ 12.78
Total Service CosUUnit $ 7363
Recommended Fee $ 7300
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.63
Current Fee Amount $
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 7300
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Datel
Development Services 184 Various Public Works Re-Inspection (New Fee) 4/21/20091
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The current fee covers one inspection and there are many times when the inspector is called to a site by the contractor and
the contractor is not there or the site is not ready for inspection and then is requested to revisit the site. The original
inspection fee is based on a percentage of the cost estimate. The recommended fee is $59.00. This represents one hour of
inspection time for a Construction Inspector II. Moreno Valley based their fee on a 4 hour minimum. Not all cities have
established this fee. The account will vary based on the type of inspection being performed.
Personnel Costs I't":;.,;!....,/.. ~.;>.
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Construction Insoector II 30.87 9.26 40.13 8.82882 48.96 1 48.96
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 48.96
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 59.00 N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev $ 432.00 Each $ 373.00 632%
O. .' to) ""
f...- (
Total Service Direct Cost $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @21.01% $ 10.29
Total Service CosVUnit $ 59.25
Recommended Fee $ 59.00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.25
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 59.00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 183 Account TCO Inspection (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to an applicant who is requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant is required to post
a bond to insure all outstanding work is finished. The recommended fee amount is $520.00. This fee is based 2.5 hours
of field review time by the Construction/Survey Manager, 2.5 hours of review time by the City Engineer and 0.5 hours of
documentation time by the Director. No other Cities have established this fee because it is not always standard practice.
Personnel Costs ~,;, :}\.;,c',/:/,)')~ ':/i'i;';"', ',:,
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labo~
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlH r. Position per Unit Cost per
Construction/Survey Manaqer 41.64 12.49 54.13 11.90904 66.04 2.5 165.10
City Enaineer 62.06 18.62 80.68 17.74916 98.43 2.5 246.07
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.5 19.08
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 430.25
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaqe
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilil1 rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other 'costs per Unit of Service:
C
d
omDarlsons to Propose Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 520.00 N/A N/A
028
Total Service Direct Cost $ 430.25
City-Wide Gen, & Admin,
Rale@21,01% $ 90.40
Total Service CosUUnit ~ 5'0 65
Recommended Fee ~ 5'0 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.65
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) ~ 520 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New Inspection for a TUP/CUP Bond Release
Development Services 183 Account (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This is an inspection fee charged to applicants who requested a Temporary Use Permit or a Conditional use Permit. The
inspection is required before the applicant's cash bond can be returned. The recommended fee is $59.00. This represents
1 hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II. No other cities have established this fee as it is included in the
application fee.
Personnel Costs I,;i,/'?\\ ',"';" ~'-"Fi"> ","",
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Uni Cost per
Construction Inspector II 30.87 9.26 40.13 8.82882 48.96 1 48.96
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 48.96
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (LesS) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino 59.00 N/A N/A
O I"J \
r-d
Total Service Direct Cost $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 21.01% $ 10.29
Total Service CosUUnit $ 5925
Recommended Fee $ 5900
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.25
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ S900
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Datel
Development Services 183 Various Revisions to Approved Plans (New Fee) 4/21/20091
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who request changes to their plans after the plans have been through the
plan check process and have signed mylars. The recommended fee is $137.00 per sheet. This fee represents review time
for a Senior Civil Engineer, a Construction/Survey Manager and documentation time for a Development Services Tech.
Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a consultant.
Personnel Costs I;':'" ",x ;Y,< ,i, - ,'iii,,:; ,1':',\Sl)~~:)r
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened H ours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Senior Civil Enoineer 48.36 .< 14.51 62.87 13.83096 76.70 1 76.70
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.1 3.82
Construction/Survey Manaoer 41.64 12.49 54.13 11.90904 66.04 0.5 33.02
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 113.54
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (EauiDment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 137.00 Per Sheet N/A N1A
Corona $ 625.00 Per Sheet $ 624.61 456%
Temecula $ 241.00 Per Sheet $ 104.00 76%
Chino $ 614.00 $ 477.00 348%
Moreno Valley (Minor) $ 261.00 Per Sheet $ 124.00 91%
Moreno Valley (Maior) $ 269.00 Per Sheet $ 132.00 96%
03U
Total Service Direct Cost $ 113.54
City-Wide Gen, & Admin,
Rate@21,01% $ 23.85
Total Service CosVUnit $ 137 39
Recommended Fee $ 137 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.39
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 137 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 4782 Certificate of Correction (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who have non-substantive changes to their tracUparcel maps after the maps
have been signed and recorded. The recommended fee is $97.00, minimum one hour. This represent 1 hour of review
time for a Senior Civil Engineer. Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a
consultant.
Personnel Costs 1<"\\.."'" ,,:,' ,....i.</.,...,,' !Ii ','J/";.,;., ;.......j."..X<
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Senior Civil EnQineer 48.36 14.51 62.87 13.83096 76.70 1 76.70
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.1 3.82
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 80.51
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C omparlsons to P rODose dF ee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost $ 80.51
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
San Bernardino $ 97.00 Per Hour N/A N/A Rate@21.01% $ 16.92
Corona $ 735.00 $ 638.00 658% Total Service CosUUnit $ 9743
Temecula $ 651.00 $ 554.00 571%
Moreno Valley $ 496.00 $ 399.00 411% Recommended Fee $ 9700
Ontario $ 334.00 $ 237.00 244% Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.43
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 9700
03J
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 188 Account NPDES Business Inspection (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
As required by the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS-4) staff is required inspect all businesses to
insure they are in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The recommended fee is
$143.00. This represents .40 hours of documentation time for the NPDES Customer Service Rep, 2 hours of inspection time for
the NPDES Inspector and .15 hours of review time by the NPDES Coordinator. The permit is a federal requirement and
regulated at the State and regional level.
Personnel Costs ,:;/P'i/i' (0, "",. iX,' i'.", '" ',',x>; ,c,):: "".: : ,*'i,;;;:.
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div, Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr, Position per Uni Cost per
NPDES Customer Service Rep. 17.84 5.35 23.19 5.10224 28.29 0.4 $ 11.32
NPDES Inspector (Construction 30.87 9.26 40.13 8.82882 48.96 2 $ 97.92
Inspector II) 0 0.00 $ -
NPDES Coordinator 37.68 11.30 48.98 10.77648 59.76 0.15 $ 8.96
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $ 118.20
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
PostaQe
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: $ -
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilitll rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 143.00 N/A N/A
Ontario (Commercial) $171.00 Average $ 28.00 20%
Ontario (Industrial) $ 263.66 Averaae $ 120.66 84%
Redlands $ 71.00 $ (72.00) -50%
Moreno Valley (Industrial) $ 451.00 $ 308.00 215%
Moreno Valley (Commercial) $ 311.00 $ 168.00 117%
Moreno Valley (Restaurant) $ 271.00 $ 128.00 90%
03~
Total Service Direct Cost $ 118.20
City-Wide Gen, & Admin,
Rate@21,01% $ 24.83
Total Service CosVUnit $ 143 04
Recommended Fee $ 143 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.04
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 143 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 184 Accou nt Billing Fee (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently staff provide a service to the utility companies by billing them a monthly invoice for permits as no charge. The
recommended fee is $59.00 per invoice. This represents 1.5 hours of review time for an Administrative Assistant.
No other cities have established this fee. When a utility requests monthly billing, this fee will be applied to cover the cost
of preparing the monthly invoice.
Personnel Costs \,,;Z> ,.' ',:: \;(\', <'i, . Ai};:; , 'f'"
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Administrative Assistant 20.72 6.22 26.94 5.92592 32.86 1.5 49.29
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 49.29
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
PostaQe
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit\ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
P
d
omparlsons to ropose Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 59.00 N/A N/A
03 ~~
Total Service Direct Cost $ 49.29
City-Wide Gen, & Admin.
Rate@21,01% $ 10.36
Total Service Cost/Unit 5) 5965
Recommended Fee 5) 5900
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.65
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) 5) 5900
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Large Family Day Care (9-14 Children) - Initial
Fire 001 4336 LicensinQ Pre-Inspection Fee. 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permit. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State
reaulations, has proposed to modifv insDection fees for care facilities
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Fire Prevention Officer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Supolies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.60
Other Costs (Eauipment, facili~ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle 40.00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
N/A
Total Service Direct Cost
123.60
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 9.31%
Total Service Cost/Unit
11.51
1:\!'i 10
Current Fee Amount
!'i0 00
85.10
21203
-1 fi? 0:\
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
03/1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Fire 001 4336 Residential - Board and Care 6 or fewer 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permit. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State
reQulations, has orooosed to modify inspection fees for care facilities
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dep!. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Fire Prevention Officer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Supplies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.60
Other Costs CEquiDment, facilit>t rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle 40.00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
N/A
Total Service Direct Cost
123.60
City~Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 9.31%
Total Service Cost/Unit
11.51
1::\fi 10
Fee Increase (Decrease)
fiOOO
8510
21203
-16? 03
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
03~)
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4743 Tow Release 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. CVC 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as
GTA are not charged, and can obtain a release 7 days a week, 8am-7pm. All other release can be obtained M-F, 8am-4pm.
The current fee is $215.00.
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.25 7.10
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.25 9.64
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.33 88.29
Community Service Officer II 21.77 8.95 30.72 3.07 33.79 1.25 42.24
Sergeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 188.47
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Police Report Fee 0.15 5 0.75
Certified Postage 3.94 2 7.88
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.88
Other Costs (EQuipment, facilit' rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino 215.00 n/a nla
Ontario PO 125.00 (105.00 -45.7%
Corona PO 155.00 (75.00 -32.6%
Redlands PO 175.00 (55.00 -23.9%
Pomona PO 100.00 (130.00 -56.5%
Riverside 205.00 (10.00 -4.3%
Total Service Direct Cost
209.35
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.30%
Total Service Cost/Unit
21.56
n091
Fee Increase (Decrease)
no 00
091
21500
1500
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
036 .
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4741 Police Photographs on CO 4f30/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for providing Police photos on a CD (in-house photos)
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Forensic Soecialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 1 42.27
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 42.27
Material & Rental Costs
Description ICost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
blank CD 0.50 1 0.50
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.50
Other Costs (Eauioment, facility rental, part-time labor wfo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Prooosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino Sheriff $2.00 per image nfa nfa
Riverside PO 9.00 CD 38.00 -80.9%
Ontario PO 15.00 CD 32.00 -68.1%
Fontana PO 32.00 CD 15.00 -31.9%
Chino PO 35.00 CD 12.00 -25.5%
Total Service Direct Cost
4277
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 10.30%
Total Service CosUUnit
4.41
4718
Current Fee Amount
4700
0.18
000
4700
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
03';
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4741 Police Photographs on CD Requiring Lab Assistance 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for transferring Police photo negatives to CD. This process requires the use of an outside lab and employee time to
transport and pick up requested work. Lab prices are $5.95 for first roll of film, $3.95 for each additional.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Forensic Specialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 1.00 42.27
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 42.27
Material & Rental Costs
Description I Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (Eauipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Lab Fee first roll of film 5.95 5.95
lab fee additional rolls 3.95
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.95
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino Sheriff $2.00 per imaae nla nla
Riverside PD 9.00 CD 44.00 -83.0%
Ontario PD 15.00 CD 38.00 -71.7%
Fontana PD 32.00 CD 21.00 -39.6%
Chino PD 35.00 CD 18.00 -34.0%
Total Service Direct Cost 48.22
Clty.Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 10.30% 4.97
Total Service Cost/Unit 5319
Recommended Fee 5300
Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.19
Current Fee Amount 0.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) 5300
03F
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4743 Traffic Citation Sign-off fees 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Police Officers issue traffic citations to the motoring public who operate vehicles with mechanical violations. These violations
must be corrected and signed off by police officers prior to the public contacting the court. Currently the Police Department
does not charge a fee for personnel to inspect vehicles, verify corrections have been made and sign off the citation.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Oirect Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Community Service Officer I 22.74 9.13 31.87 1.75 33.62 0.33 11.09
Lieutenant - Watch Commander 62.8673 27.68 90.55 4.75 95.30 0.1 9.53
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 20.62
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (Eauipment, facili~1 rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino nla nla
Ontario PD 0.0%
Corona PD (20.00 -100.0%
Redlands PD (20.00) -100.0%
Pomona PD (20.00) -100.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
20.62
City. Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.30%
Total Service CosUUnit
2.12
77 7fi
Fee Increase (Decrease)
7000
275
0.00
7000
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
03H
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Descriotion Date
Police 001 4741 Recorded Investigative Evidence on CD 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing recorded investigative evidence (interviews, taped info) to CD.
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Police Detective 45.67 18.27 63.94 6.39 70.33 0.25 17.58
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 17.58
Material & Rental Costs
Description Icost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Blank CD 0.50 1 0.50
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.50
Other Costs (Eauioment, facilitv rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Prooosed Fee
More (less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 19.00 n/a nfa
Riverside PD 9.00 CD (10.00) -52.6%
Ontario PD 15.00 CD (4.00) -21.1 %
Fontana PD 32.00 CD 13.00 68.4%
Chino PD 35.00 CD 16.00 84.2%
Total Service Direct Cost
18.08
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 10.30%
Total Service CosUUnit
1.86
1995
Current Fee Amount
HI 00
0.95
0.00
1900
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
040
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
User Fee Descri tion
False Burgla Alarm Fines
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false burglary alarm calls. Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines incurred for permitted
locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1 st to 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th-9th false alarm will be $90 and the 10th and subseauent false alarm $175.
Fees have not been increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.5 19.28
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 0.5 33.19
Seraeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.25 20.60
Senior Office Assistant 19.84 7.96 27.80 2.78 30.58 0.33 10.09
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 83.16
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaae 0.42 1 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.42
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentag
SBPD 75.00 nla nla
Riverside PO Fine #5 75.00 0.00 0.0%
Pomona PO #5 220.00 145.00 193.3%
Newport Beach PO - Fine #5 125.00 50.00 66.7%
Irvine PO #5 150.00 75.00 100.0%
Ontario #5 150.00 75.00 100.0%
Huntinaton Beach #5 200 125.00 166.7%
Total Service Direct Cost
83.58
e
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 10.30%
Total Service CosUUnit
8.61
9219
Fee Increase (Decrease)
7500
17.19
50.00
2500
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
041
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Police
User Fee Description
False Robbery Alarm Fines
Date
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false robbery alarm calls. Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines incurred for permitted
locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1st to 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th-6th false alarm will be $250. 7th-9th will be $300 and the 10th and
subsequent false alarm $350. Fees have not been increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. osition per Uni Cost per
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.75 28.92
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.67 110.86
SerQeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20
Senior Office Assistant 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 190.35
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Postaae 0.42 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.42
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o bene its)
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
f
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentag
SBPD 175.00 nla nla
Riverside PD Fine #5 300.00 100.00 50.0%
Newport PD #5 125.00 (75.00) -37.5%
Irvine #5 150.00 (50.00) -25.0%
Ontario #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
HuntinQton Beach #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
e City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.30%
Total Service CosUUnit
190.77
19.65
21041
Fee Increase (Decrease)
200 00
10.41
100.00
100 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
042
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Public Services 132 4820 Sewer Lateral Capping Fee (City Crew) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently, staff charges an applicant who is requesting sewer lateral capping services $500, the cost of the contractor who
performs the work. To recover the costs of City personnel and administrative overhead needed to inspect the sewer lateral
capping services performed by the contractor, Public Services is proposing to increase the fee by $300.
Personnel Costs '''C .",,";' ::3X,~" .... ',> ,c,." ;..;r
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Sewer Maintenance Supervisor 30.97 10.84 41.81 4.18095 45.99 2 91.98
IW Customer Service Rep. 17 5.95 22.95 2.295 25.25 0.25 6.31
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 98.29
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each buantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Contractor Cost 500.00 1 500
Fleet Charaes Vehicle 539 15.5 3 46.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 546.50
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino N/A N/A N/A
Riverside Inspection only $300 $148.50 N/A
Rialto Inspection only $157 $148.50 N/A
Redlands Inspection only $282 $148.50 N/A
Loma Linda N/A N/A N/A
Moreno Valley N/A N/A N/A
Ontario N/A N/A N/A
043
Total Service Direct Cost $ 644.79
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 11.02% $ 71.06
Total Service CosVUnit $ 715 85
Recommended Fee $ 715 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.85
Current Fee Amount $ 500.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 215 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Sewer Lateral Inspection Fee ( Private
Public Services 132 4820 Contractor) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently, staff charges $50.00 for sewer lateral inspection services performed by a private contractor. Staff recommends
that the fee be increased by an additional $50.00, to recoup the $100 cost to the City for these services. Contractor
charges the City $100.00 per inspection.
Personnel Costs
Position
Inspector Costs
Straight Time
Labo
100
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
Dept. or Div.
Overhead
0.00 0.00
Total Burdened Hours by
Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit
Total Labo
Cost per
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
100.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
ompansons to Proposed Fee
\ More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino N/A N/A N/A
Riverside N/A N/A N/A
Rialto N/A N/A N/A
Corona N/A N/A N/A
Loma Linda N/A N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev N/A N/A N/A
Ontario N/A N/A N/A
01/1
Total Service Direct Cost $ 100.00
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 11.02% $ 11.02
Total Service CosUUnit $ 111 02
Recommended Fee $ 100 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 11.02
Current Fee Amount $ 50.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 5000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO.
(C(Q)fPlf
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C)
THROUGH (F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN A PARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEES RELATIVE TO
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
WHEREAS, there is in place a Master Fee Resolution setting forth the amounts of the
various fees to be assessed by the departments of the City as determined by the Mayor and
Common Council in the exercise of their authority to set the amount of such fees; and
WHEREAS, it is the finding of the Mayor and Common Council that certain of the
language contained in the Master Fee Resolution would better serve its intended purpose if
placed in the appropriate place in the Municipal Code: and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Mayor and Common Council to amend the Master
Fee Resolution to add fees and to amend the fees set forth therein and pursuant thereto, it is
necessary to amend the Municipal Code to provide appropriate authority for such addition and
amendment.
THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Section 8.27.100 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is amended to
read as follows:
The Code Compliance Director shall forthwith initiate proceedings before the Board of
Building Commissioners for determination and collection of the assessment for cost of
abatement.
A. The Code Compliance Director shall, upon completion of the abatement, itemize the
costs thereof including all incidental expenses and administrative costs.
5-/ g-o<1
:::# ~() C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C)
THROUGH. (F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN A PARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEES RELATIVE TO
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
B. The costs and expenses determined under subsection (A) shall, if unpaid, be assessed
against and become a lien upon the property on which the nuisance was abated to be collected
at the time and in the manner of the real property taxes by the Tax Collector, pursuant to the
procedure set forth in Chapter 3.68.
C. Fees for processing of demands for information regarding liens imposed under this
chapter shall apply in an amount set by resolution of the Mayor and Common Council.
Section 2.
Section 8.30.130 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is amended to
read as follows:
The confirmed cost of abatement of a nuisance upon any lot or parcel of land shall constitute a
special assessment against the respective lot or parcel of land to which it relates; and, after it
recording, as thus made and confirmed, the same shall constitute a lien upon the property in the
amount of the assessment.
A. After the confirmation of the Report, a copy thereof shall be transmitted to the Code
Compliance Division, whereupon the amounts of the assessment or assessments shall be totaled
and added as a lien against the respective lots and parcels for municipal purposes in such
manner that thereafter the amounts shall be collected at the same time and under the same
procedures as for property taxes, and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same
procedures for foreclosure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for property taxes.
B. Fees for processing of demands for information regarding liens imposed under this
chapter shall apply in an amount set by resolution of the Mayor and Common Council.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C)
THROUGH (F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN A PARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEES RELATIVE TO
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
Section 3.
Section 8.36.070 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is amended to
read as follows:
The Mayor and Common Council shall from time to time determine and fix an amount to be
assessed as administrative fees under this Chapter including fees for response to demands for
information regarding liens imposed hereunder.
Section 4.
Section 12.64.020 of the San Bernardino Municipal code IS hereby
amended to read as follows:
A. No person shall use any public or private property, facility or residence for the purpose
of taking commercial motion pictures or television pictures or commercial still photography
without first applying for and receiving a permit from the City Manager.
B. No permit shall issue before such time as the applicant has completed a proper
application and paid the applicable fee. The City Manager, or his/her designee, is authorized to
issue a filming and/or still photography permit to any applicant fulfilling the requirements of
this Chapter.
Section 5.
Section 15.28.150 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is amended to
read as follows;
A. The same procedures provided in Section 15.28.140 for abating nuisances through
securing from entry any structure which is determined by the Building Official to be
immediately dangerous or hazardous may be used by the Building Official in connection with
the summary abatement of all other nuisances upon private property which the Building
3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C)
THROUGH (F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN A PARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEES RELATIVE TO
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 B.
Official determines in his discretion to constitute an immediately dangerous or hazardous
condition.
The Building Official or his representative may summarily abate conditions found to be
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
a nuisance under subsection (A) in his discretion in the most appropriate manner under the
circumstances.
1. The manner of abatement may include, but is not limited to, the following methods:
fencing, draining water from swimming pools and filling with appropriate ballast, removing the
fire hazards, filling or covering open holes and grading or strengthening landfills or
excavations.
2. Although the manner and method used by the Building Official shall be at his
discretion, he shall, in making his determinations, seek the most economical method and
endeavor not to place an undue economic hardship upon the owners of the property, using only
those measures which will eliminate the dangerous and hazardous conditions.
C. The Building Official shall immediately after such abatement action mail notice to the
owners as provided in Section 15.28.140. The notice shall include:
(1) a description of the action he has taken;
23 (2)
the cost thereby incurred by the City, including all administrative costs;
24
25
26
27
28
(3) the reasons why he has taken the action;
(4) that an appeal may be taken within ten days to the Board of Building Commissioners as
provided in Section 15.28.140; and
4
1
2
3
4
5
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C)
THROUGH (F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN A P ARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEES RELATIVE TO
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
(5)
that if this action is not annulled by the Board of Building Commissioners, the cost of
6 abating the nuisance on the property shall become a special assessment and lien on the property
7 unless the cost is paid to the City within thirty days of the mailing of the notice.
8 D.
9
10
11
12
Fees for processing of demands for information regarding liens imposed under this
chapter shall apply in an amount set by resolution of the Mayor and Common Council.
E. The procedures hereunder for appeal, hearing, and any other actions shall be as
provided in Chapter 3.68 for determination and collection of the assessment for costs of
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
abatement.
Section 6. Section 12.80.055 is hereby added to the San Bernardino Municipal Code to
read as follows:
12.80.055 Consumption of Alcohol in a Public Park - Permit required
A. The drinking or consumption and/or the offering, giving, or furnishing of alcoholic
beverages may be authorized by written permit from the City Manager or his designee in any
building or park fot special events, meetings, conferences or conventions. Such permit shall be
requested in writing. The permit, if granted, shall be subject to conditions set forth therein and
to all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City and the general law. Any permit granted
hereunder may be modified or summarily revoked at any time by the Mayor, Common Council,
City Manager or Chief of Police without prior notice or hearing.
1. Any person, firm, corporation, society or organization applying for a permit under this
section shall file an application for same with the Director pursuant to the procedures set forth
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C)
THROUGH (F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN A PARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEES RELATIVE TO
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
in Section 12.80.060, and shall in addition, clearly set forth in the application at a minimum;
(1) the intent to offer, give or furnish alcoholic beverages during the event described in the
application for permit, (2) the quantity of alcohol proposed to be distributed, and (3) the
manner for control of the distribution of alcohol at the event, and (4) such additional
information as may be required by the City Manager or his designee.
2. Separate and apart, any permit issued hereunder shall be subject to such processing and
regulation as required by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
3. Any use permitted hereunder shall be limited to the consumption of beer and wine.
Section 7.
Subsection 12.80.100 (C) through (F) are hereby added to the San
Bernardino Municipal Code to read as follows:
C. Waivers and Exemptions:
1. The following groups shall pay no fees for a permit:
a. Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department sponsored activities.
b.
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department co-sponsored activities.
c.
The Mayor or his designee may exempt non-profit associations and corporations
organized primarily for patriotic, civic betterment or charitable purposes or any local civic or
charitable organization from the requirement to pay a fee for the use of park and recreation
buildings and facilities upon a finding that the fee would create a financial hardship
jeopardizing the activity or event planned for such use and that the activity or event will be of
unusual benefit to the residents of the City and should be supported with public funds.
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTION 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C) THROUGH
(F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE LANGUAGE
CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY THE PROCESS
FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TON CONSUME ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE IN A
PARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEE RELATIVE TO PROCESSING OF
INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
(1). The word 'local as used herein is defined to mean an organization whose membership is
comprise of fifty-one percent (51 %) of city residents.
(2). As a condition of exemption, the association, corporation, organization or goup seeking
exemption may be required to perform services or provide labor beneficial to the City or its
residents.
2. The following groups shall pay reduced fees in the amount as specified:
a. The san Bernardino City Unified School District shall pay fifty percent (50% of the
established rates.
b. Non-profit, youth-serving organization located permanently in and serving the City of San
Bernardino are those organizations whose principal purpose is to provide a service or program
to participants, generally under the age of 18, of which at least 51 percent (51%) reside in the
City of San Bernardino. Groups in this classification shall pay not fee for use of outdoor
athletic facilities.
D. Refundable damage bonds and clean-up deposits
Refundable damage bonds and clean-up deposits shall be required for all special events, athletic
events, fundraisers and other events which warrant such bonds and deposits based on specific
number of people and uses of facilities and equipment.
E. Refundable deposits
Refundable deposits held pursuant to this ordinance may be refunded in full or in part within
fourteen (14) days after completion of the use period. No refund shall be made until using
party
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C)
THROUGH (F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN A PARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEES RELATIVE TO
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
or groups has secured a signed inspection and release form from the appropriate facility
manager, and delivered this executed release form to the Parks, Recreation and Community
Services Department. Deductions for any damage to the facility or for clean up and repairs
shall be made from the said deposit by City.
F. Utilization of City Employees.
During any event when a City employee or employees are required to be present for the
purposes of clean up, monitoring, etc., a fee shall be paid equivalent to the total cost of said
employees.
II I
II I
II I
8
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS
8.27.100, 8.30.130, 8.36.070, 12.64.020, AND 15.28.150 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 12.80.055 AND 12.80.100(C)
THROUGH (F) THERETO TO INCORPORATE INTO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE MASTER FEE RESOLUTION, TO CLARIFY
THE PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A PERMIT TO CONSUME ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN A PARK, AND TO AUTHORIZE FEES RELATIVE TO
PROCESSING OF INFORMATION CONCERNING LIENS.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held on the
7 _day of
, 2009, by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members:
AYES
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
ESTRADA
BAXTER
BRINKER
SHORETT
KELLEY
JOHNSON
MCCAMMACK
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day of
2009.
Patrick J. Morris, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to form:
JAMES F. PENMAN,
26 City Attorney
27 BY:~ 1- /~
28 {J
9
<I::
....
c
CJ
E
.c
u
..::
-
<I::
~ ~ ~
-;~~=
E:: c ~
...."Cc~
r:J~<~".,
....~
-; ~ .c _
_'~ ~ N
o '" _
Eo- ~ III
~8
-~'i:'=t
~ 1; : 0
..J"C.......O
~c:N
CJ
-
eo:
"0
c..
;:;J
~
~
~
I.
~
rIJ
;:;J
"0
~
rIJ
o
c..
o
I.
~
'It
M
0::1
....
..2
o
.".
".,
,:;2
- ~
.. Q)
= ~
~ .~
U-
...... ,-.. 0
~ ~ 0
~~V'l
.. ~
'" '"
U U
C ..
-c
-".,
E g
E ~ 0
i3 ~ N
~
~
-
C 0
~ ~ ~
;~~
U
.!!
-
1= ~
~....
.. Q)
roo. III
I:
CU
(,)
:.:i
"C
CU
...
~
<I::
o
~.:::
G:i C
c8
-;
E
'c
<I::
....
C<:l
Q)
;>"Q)
N en
0::1 ~
;.. .::!
..2-
o ~
~ ~
o
o
o
o
'=t
o CC
g E
o' :E
- E
".,
0'00
o~~
v)V'lN
~
Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
0\ M
I~C'!
- N
N -
Eo';
Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
0'00
O~~
OOVl
~N
Eo';
Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
0'00
OO~
v)v)M
~-
Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
Eo';
'=t--
00\0\
00\0\
N --
o
o
O.
o
Z
Q)
-5
Vl
~
CC
-
E
~
C<:lg
.5 o.
.= Vl
EN
Eo';
o
e::
o
o
00
V'le::
r- 0
'-0
Eo';
r-
~
00
0\
Eo'; Eo';
M r-
~~
co 0
N r-
Eo';
Eo'; Eo';
o
~
o
V'l
-
00
00
00
NO
-
Eo';
Eo'; Eo';
o
o
o
V'l
00
Vl 0
NO
- '=t
Eo'; Eo';
Eo';
M
o
o
N
M '=t
00
00
N N
~ ~
'Vi Z... I
C..;"CU ~ "C
8ii-5 .... ~~
.- E 0 C .: CU
"geCUC 0 "C:::
'f ~ ~ -:: '~:9 ~ ~
a::: ~ fr.!! .co CXl ~
CU CUa::: '" ~~~....
~Q.,';;'~ g;C.sC
~~Q)'::c<l::C<:l"'O
.::: C CU r- 0 .c Q)'Vi
...J CU .... a'd '';:; ~ t .~ ii
"C ~ ~ .... .S:! .s CU - .c
~CI:Q)"C",""~CU
~ ~ .~ ~.~ .~ ~ ~ ~
<l::O...JO-....JCi...J<I::
000
~ ~ ~
000
UUU
~-;~
.5.5.5
C I: l:
<<<
N M""
o
l::
l:
o
U
~
E
'c
<
E E
CC
o 0
uu
~-;
E E
'c 'c
<<
Vl
'-0 r-
Q)
<E
=
.:;2
Vl
I:
~
~
....
0.
0.
C<:l
....
Q)
'00
00
q o.
V'l -
Eo';
Eo';
000
o~~
ONV'l
N N
Eo'; Eo';
Q)
<E
=
.2
E
o
"C
cc
....
Q)
....
o
Z
Q)
-5
en
Q)
e;
=
.5
@
I '0
o
q
V'l
Eo'; Eo';
Eo';
010' 00
~o~~
VlOV'lN
I:::
Vl
'- Q)
o .:::
~ ~
en Q)
o Vl
u
-=~ ~
.;::
.... 0::1
~ .;::
o Q)
UQ:)o
.s:>Eo';
"C ~ .~
~ u ~
a3 e c
] ~ ~
I
Eo';
Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
r-MOr-r-M
O\C!~NN\C!'
O'=tMr--:r--:'=t
r-NVl"<t~N
Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
0000000
~~ooo~e::
OOOOOV'lN
O-lr}MM--
-
Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
o
~
V'l
N
Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
00
o~
oco
co
0000
e::~o~
V'l000
N ~ --
Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
'=t'=t'-O"<t'=t-'-O
000000\0
000000\"0
NNNNN-N
c
Q)
~ I~.E
... e; ~ ....
~ U"C ~
~ "C ~ "C 0.
::; ~~~o
Q) ~ 9 CXl .9
~ ~ .~Iel~ ~ e;
.~ ~ t J! ~ 0 .~
c~(f)ccgg
CU 0 .Co 0 0 '';:; :>
i3CXl:::>..;:;',;:;~",
5.~~~~a:E
c: C<:l ._ "C "C I ~ 0::1
<OQ.,<I::<IUcG
0"00
EE~
000
uuu
0000
'-'-1-_
CCCC
o 0 0 0
uuuu
-;-;-;~~-;-;
EEEEEEE
'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c
<<<1::<<<<
coO\:::
- N
;)
z
0000
0000
OCOOO
"<t' Olr-.:'
- V'lN
Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
0000
e::~e::~
V'l V'l 0 '-0
--000
-
Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
O\'=tOM
~V)--:V")
V)-MOO
-MOCO
N --
Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
0000
e::ooe::
VlOOO
-MOOO
N --
Eo'; Eo'; Eo'; Eo';
o
'e::
Vl
-
N
Eo'; Eo';
,0
~
~
0\
Eo'; Eo';
~co~'-O
~g{.l.lg::
;ZNZ-
Q)
<E
'"
~ ~
'Vi ii
cu"C"C
Q) CU l:
.... N Q)
.;:: Q.,
CU 0....
~~.co
::~~8,;;>
E a::: :5 ''5 .~
~~......;Z::l
.... 0 0...... ...
cur--::O::l
-; cu ,~ Q) <S
cn~~~o
"E.cEQ)~
o::ICUCU4)=
>-:>a:::a:::-=:
..:.:
...
CU
D
.~
~
CU CU CU Q)
"0 "C "C "0
o 0 0 0
uuuu
M ~ V'l '-0
Q)
.....
o ;;;-
~o;:
_co
.~ ;;; ~
~ .s 'c
-"C::l
o.Q)_
E OJ) C<:l
01:25
u ~"Z "'0
"5u:OCU
~ f1) "'0 ~
Q).oC<:l~
.... _ .c
,P ""Q ~
~.~ a:s 5
~ .~ '-.5
Q)!:i<SC<:l
en _ Q) s::
2"<t~~
~~~:::
r--5r-~
o
q
\0
co
Eo';
l""'\
on
00
co
-
Eo';
o
o
o
co
-
Eo';
o
q
..,.
0\
{A
\0
0\
0\
--'
CU
~
:>.
u
I:
o
-0
C
o
c...
.....
o
CU
.S:!
(5
;Z
.....
o
CU
'"
ell
CU
"1)
a:::
---.
o
>
o
.0
ell
-0
C
C<:l
'"
.t:
I:
::l
Vl
---
o
-0
o
U
o
o
co.
co
N
Eo';
o
o
o
N
Eo';
M
~
'-0
-
--'
Eo';
o
o
V'l
-
-
Eo';
o
q
on
0\
{A
'-0
0\
0\
-
E-
CU
0.
o
B ~ a.
~ c co
._ 0
... E""
C.o~
""" ~ "(;
<S.o OJ)
CU 0::1 CU
~gfii
'-~ ~ ::
._ CU
CU ::l C
l:: .0 .-
.~ "'"' gf
I: 1:: ._
.- Q) ....
E 0.=
-0 0 '"
<( a ~
o
-0
o
U
r-
o
o
<'l
'=t
'=t
Eo';
o
o
V'l
00
Eo';
o
M
-.c
0\
Eo';
o
~
V'l
0\
Eo';
o
~
o
-
Eo';
'-0
0\
0\
-
-0
I:
C<:l
E
cu
0---.
- en
cu I:
OJ).2
a...J
.c......
U 0
Q) '"
.~ i
0::1 -
l::(f)
'" I
'c ~
'e Q)
"Ct::
<I::~
Q)
u
,;::
(5
'"
...
~
o:l
~g
o~_
UVl
CU
"0
o
U
00
-(
-
=
Q,l
-
-
-
~
.;;
-
-(
'tl C':
~ =
C': ,_52
.E
_:0
"''tl
'""<
4.l .-::
e.; =
;S "- e
~ t-
Eo< QI '"
I:na
-]-':\0\0
;~~g:g:
..:ltC--
::;
=
Cl,j
S
S
Q
U
- Clol
C': =
= =
= Clol
= >
-("
00
00
~C't
N N
......
o
o
o
..,;
\0
000
lrlOon
r--~......
I:::
~~
.....-.00
~~c:on
C':Cl:ClOO
Clol QI 00
I- l-
e.; e.;
= Clol
-A
-~~
0', ......
~O',
ClO N
NO
~~
5 ~g
SClolooO
8~N;::
QI
==
~~
-
= 00
ClolQlOon
l:Clolo'"
=r..N-
U
~~
~
0000
0000
\0 0 0
-"NN
0',
GI;~~GI;GI;GI;~
o
c:
lrl
\0
0000000
C:C:C:C:C:C:C:
O',............lrlMO',O
0', V"l ""'" ClO r-- V"l N
V)
~
GI;~~GI;~~GI;
o
ClO
r--
r--
N
O......MNMonV)
C:OC~""'~N\O
0',"""""" lrlM "'0
0', V) ""'" ClO r-- on N
V)
GI;
~GI;~GI;GI;~~
o
c:
V"l
r--
N
0000000
OC:C:C:C:OO
o\M......lrlMo\O
0', V"l ""'" ClO r-- V) N
V)
~
~~~GI;GI;GI;~
o
o
o
t I f I I I I
-
-
GI;
GI; ~ GI; GI; GI; ~ ~
\0
0',
0',
-
~~~~~~~
LLl UU.Ll LLl UJ UJ LLl
ZZZZZZZ
"0 '"
<I) "0 ~
<I) <I) <I) <I)
~ ~ ~ "">
ce:, ::>OtU......
_Clol.~ <I) ......l et:: E
bIl 0.......
-....... ~c:;;Q)
i= oll Q) ~I~Q..
Clol Q) U Q) Cl:1~ - =
~ ~ Q) ~ > ~ ~ .~
~.~-;;.~ 5M] 5
~~cecaco~
.....tnut:iQ)..c'""~
.~:5 5 :5 S Eo< ..8 -E
-::::E~E~~E...
::"O.c"O~00
O-(-<<<~U~
~
-
~
~
Q.
;:I
~
~
~
I-
~
'"
o
~
~
'"
Q
C.
o
I-
Q.,
:;t
c.
Clol
Q
11.) 11.)
"0 "0
o 0
uu
0\ 0
- N
u
>
u
E
Q)
rJl
rJl
11.)
~
.5
~
...
~
-<
o
lrl
N
0000
V)ooo
\0-00
r--:"N'
N
~
~ GI; ~ GI;
o
o
0\
V"l
00000000000000000
C:OC:C:C:OOC:C:C:C:C:C:C:C:C:C:
~~MO\lrlV"llrlv)lrllrlV"lV"lV"lV"lv)V"lv)
...... 0\ ""'" V)
- -
~
~GI;GI;GI;~~GI;~~GI;~~~~~~~
V)
N
0\
lrl
O',M"","V)
......"":c:~
~r--MO\
"""0',,,,,," V)
- -
~
~~~~~~~~~~Cl:~~
~~GI;GI;cccccccC=Cl:C=
o
c:
0\
lrl
00000000000000000
C:OC:C:C:OOOC:OOC:OOC:C:O
r--~MO',OOOOOOOlrlOOv)oo
......0',""'"V"l""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"""'"
- -
~
~~~~GI;~~~~~~~~~GI;~GI;
~
0000000000
'C:ooooooooo
V)"';"';"';"';"';"';o"';"';
MMMMM......M""'"..........,
~~GI;~GI;~GI;~~~~GI;~~
~
Ul
Z
000
oc:c:
o V) V)
""'"...., M
GI;~~
~~~~ClOClOOCClOOCooooooOCOOClOOCOO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"0 Z
C ...
~ '" ti B IZ
C ... ~ C ~::!: ~~ 5
o - t'd 0 .c Cl: tio u
~ ~.... ~ ~c~ 0 ~ ~- C
~Q)~oc~ "Oo~ aQ)~ t'd~ ~~
.c Q) ~ 11.) 0 Q)'':; ~ E 'Vi ~ -C Q) 1=_ 0
~ "'c ~ .- Q.. > u '" 0"" Q) u ,~ N
U = _ u t) ~ 0 Q) .5 - .... ~ 11):::: 5!!1"'::;;
C I to: Q) Eo< :s. "'0'" '" ~ ~c (;j _5;; ~ ~c 'g
~ ,9 Q) ,: Q.< c. U '" g(ii - ~ ~, E""_ _ ,- ~
Q..t)et::trJlCl: II) 'WQ)~~CI-~~~
..... VJ Q) C '- C tI) ..... > - ... -.
M 9- ~ U - 0 0 '0 'Vi Cl: '- C ~ ~ ~ t'd =
a 1a 0 C ~ ~ ;; Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ -5 :g ~ s .~ e ~
.c - ~ Cl: C 0 C ~ ~ II) 0 .- ~ Cl: _ ..,'- .... '-
r-- ti 0 5!! '':; Q) .9 u rn ~ E ~ ~ C Q. ~ C ~ ~ ~
Q) ":':.!:! Q. :: ~ ~ '" ~ Ul C '-2 .5 5!! ~ ~ = .- '9 ,- .5
... c:c E u Q. ~ "> t Q.- II) > - u ~ Cl: ~ C E ~
o~=Q)u"'II)Q)Q)Q.. >oo.2c"'oo ...
~COQ..r--O.5et::~UZCOO~zco<~...lZ~~
VJ en fJ) VJ U} Cf.l tI)
<I) <I) <I) Q) Q) <I) Q)
u u u u u u u
'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E 'E
<I) <I) <I) Q) Q) <I) Q)
I:nrnrnrnrnl:nrn
> > > > > > >
<I) Q) <I) Q) Q) <I) <I)
QQQOQQO
<I)
"0
o
U
N
NM"","V)\Or--ClO
NNNNNNN
'"
Q)
u
';;
...
II)
rn
>
11.)
Q
'(3 '(3
Cl: t'd
~~
'" '"
,'-~- Q)
:E
'(3 '(3
Cl: Cl:
~~
VJ VJ (J'.) VJ VJ rI)
:E :E :E :~ :E :E
'(3 '(3 'u '(3 'u '(3
t'd t'd (Q Cl: Cl: Cl:
~~~~~~
0\
N
0- N <")
(""f""l M M ('f")
00
c:c:
V) lrl
~ GI;
Cl: Cl:
l:l:
00
00
00
""'"""'"
~ GI;
00
c:c:
V) V)
M ....,
~ GI;
00 00
00
00
N N
~
o
...
...
t'd
C
t) rn
-~>. ~
~ =
'" (;j 0
C , ..c
~gp ~~
'~ :g (;j ~
.c e il .5 ~
5~1S ~~
~]'~~:g:g
~~:.:i~~~
'" '"
:E :~
'(3 '(3
Cl: Cl:
~~
N
.,
<)
IE
o
III
-...
II)
c.o
'"
fa~
~o
c~
u~
<
u
..;:
-
<
-
=
l
~
-
~
=
=
o
U
"C C'l ~
~ ~ : ~
=; = ~
-"C=t
"'''C<~
~<
__ ,-. 0
~ ~ ~
~ C'l I/")
~ ~ 0\
~ ~-
... ...
= ~
-Q
-~
-
"; ~ '=
- ';> e
'= ~-
Eo-< ~ '"
~8~
e ~
5 ~ 0
O~\C
...r..N
~
~
-
= 0
~ ~ ~
~ ~ I/")
;r..\C
U ~
_ ~ 'i:' 00
'" C'l = 0
="C,~~o
.Jc. N
~
000000000000000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I/") I/") IJ")I/") I/") I/") I/")IJ")I/")I/")I/")IJ")IJ") 1/")1/")
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~.!:~~~~~~~~~
= = = = = = = = = = = = c = =
000000000000000
oo~~o~oo~o~oo~~
000000000000001/")
""""""",,"""""""""""""""""""1/")
~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
000000000000000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IJ")IJ")IJ")IJ")I/")IJ")IJ")IJ")IJ")IJ")IJ")IJ")IJ")IJ")O
MMMMM\CMMMMMMMMIJ")
-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000
000000000000000
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
"C ~ '(3
B g c -;
:E .9 g ::E
:.a ~-U -
o ._ 0';::; U
~ Q: E 52 e ~
-U E:::i:O 0
E="U ou::E au
~:.a U U"t)
~U I I I Ol:~:.a
r.. > gf gf b.l c .5 U
_ ._._.5'~ ~ >
.:': ~ ~ ~ t a as
~ ~~~~Q..c
E gf.-:: .-:: .<;:: .: as .g
E~=E=U'-::=
o !o E ~ 5 ~ .E 15
UQ..Q..Q..Q..rn....:l<
~
-
~
"0
Q.
:;;;J
~
~
~
I...
~
<Il
':;;i
,
~
<Il
Q
Q.
Q
I...
~
~
~
Q '"
U
:.;
'(3
'"
~
"It
'"
.J:J
'"
Eo-<
E~ tj)-c~
u8~~~ ~~'=
~~gs~"'S9.fi
5 5 ..c r.n .... '0 :E .~ ~
"'rIlOO~Uk,'''CO
"C"C~rn~;:~->.
U ~ U ~ '" .- = E '"
1; 0 1;.5 l:l:: ~.- U c..
= g. k' ~ 0 ~ ~ Q..!!J
~5c"'c_>0"C
.: 'i:; ~ c..;; ~ 0 z .s
c ;:) ... "C - .= ~ I U
~ ~ B ~ .~ .5 \C ...
<Ii E 's... 5 ~ \0 .E
U 0 > ._ 0 ..... '" ....'{U
~U~....:l~,..:;p..~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:E :-8 :E :E ~ :E :.e :.2 ~ :E :.2 :E :E :.e :-2
.~ .~ '~ '~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~.~ ~.~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0000000
~c:~c:c:~c:
I/") I/") I/") I/") I/") I/") IJ")
~~~~~~~
Cl)
ce
V5
'-
o
~ ~ -
o ~_Cl)_ .~
t) -
to) E B
.:: .~
0] ~
..s.8 oui
c 0 c
as 0 ~ .2
"C"C '011
;> ~ c .... ::l
oO::~"CQ.{)
Q. ..0.- 'Sc ~ ~
Cl)~rIlc"C
ce'- C '" c
E ,-=: 0 -B '"
.... '"
.~ 'u s ~.E
w ~ '(3 ~ 2
o I
o
o
o
M
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
l:l:Cl:l:Cl:l:
00000
~~~c:~
0001/") I/")
..,. <<t..,. 0000
M M
~~~~~~~
00
~c:
00'"
O\O\g
';:
'"
>
0000000'"
~c:~oo~c:g
IJ") I/") IJ") 001/") IJ") .;:
MMM~~OOOO",
~~~~~~~>
0000000000000000
00000000
00000000
NNNNNNNN
-;
.~
'"
o
::c
U
ce
V5
c
o
t:
'"
p..
gf
~ ~
.9 ~
t) ....
.;: .J:J ~ C
1;) :; C ~
Q) U'- .....
... ~ 9i?
'- E ~ ....
00..."C
g<t:c'!!
.= Co ~ ~
'" ... '"
o-;;g~
>~'Egf
c....:o~
o e '" 0
t: 0 '" 0
~::Ei5CQ
'"
~~ c
~ .g
'"
~]
.-:: >
~ Q.{)
C .5
U r: ~
;~~
....:l..:::
~ ~ .!
._._ 0
~~E-
tI) tI) U':I U') tI'J VJ VJ tI)
:E :E :E ~ :€ :~ ~ :€
'(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3 '(3
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
~~~~~~~""'
~
~
,-.
M
~
N
\C
-
'-'
~
o
~
o
I/")
~
M
~
N
-
N
~
00
o
o
N
...
o
\C
<<t ~
- '"
0.. gfl U
Cl) '(i; "C
a fi C
U 0 '"
i;':.:3 ~
0-; ciS
~:.e ,
'-E ..5 - -
-c'"
~ fi.g 'E
U ... 0 U
e.n;g 9. ~
"'..::: '" U
....:lu..5~
U U
... ...
~ ~
<<t
M
Cl)
ie
V5
~
<l)
=
~
o
..,
'~
C
.::
Q.
c
C
u
....
o
en
'(i;
= ...
80<.2
U ._2 =
.J:J 0
B ~ t5
:::'r ::l
"C a::;- "C
~.... ~
; -g <l)
..:::tt::-e
u '" '"
t,!! cg
~2o...
I _
o
o
0\.
00
N
-
~
~
-
M
c:
N
\C
-
-
'"
U
.;:
'"
>
~
o
o
o
II')
'"
:l
o
.;:
'"
>
~
M
~
N
-
N
~
'"
:l
o
.;:
'"
>
00
o
o
N
~
u.l
Z
Q.{)
=
'(i;
:l
o
::c
.b
's
'"
~
...-;
U -
~ fi
~~
.,
(j
!B
o
U
....
~
-~
.,
1>0
'"
CO\
"'0
~o
cC::!
u~
V'l
l""l
-<
.::
.c::
""
..s
-
<
"0 ~
~ c
C'l 0
e::::
_"0
"'''0
l.oJ<
.~
~ ~ 5
"0 -E rs
Eo- ~ '"
00 0
u
]":,,,
........-00
'" C'l C'lo
C'l"O~0
...;l c.> N
;::;J'-'
Q)
ce
Vi
:E
~
-
en E
_ t/)
C 'ijj
4.l =:
e 0
e U :::
o Q).52
U~]
"0 en
Q) IU
;;> ....
000
e :::
Ci) <':l
.... t/)
Q)~
Q) ::l
.... ....
4.l
C'l =
= =
= 4.l
= ...
<=:~
~~oo
",,,,v)
C'lC'l_
::::~
",,,,-
==~'-'
-Q
'-' ~
E
e <Ii
o ~
",r-
<Ii
=:
~
000
V) 0 0
'" r- r-
v-\
,...,
~~~
000
o~~
V) r- ,...,
- """ V)
~~~
- ~ 0\
O\V)-
6~,...,
,..., - V)
N
~~~
000
OO~
6r-:,...,
,..., ~ V)
N
~~~
o
o
'"
-
N
~~~
QC~~
8uJuJ
NZZ
'0
o
r-
~
00
~~
o 0\
N -
~~
V) '"
t-:~
N 0\
N -
~~
00
~~
o 0\
N -
~~
~~
~~
uJuJ
;z;z
...... ~
CI.l C<l
u ....l
= Q) OIl
~e Q) =
C<l .... 'i:
0... ~,...., ~ 'S
oU=C<l go
~ 1<i ~ ,52 ~ ~
E=u~g~QCl
<Ii ~ca ~ oUU
~Qg..5]55
:>'=0
=-=<uo",,,,
e,-,=>~-ao
C<l=t':"O(6"t':U
.... 0 = = l::: ... =
CI.l":: ~ ::s 0 ~~
00":::: C 2 - - ,_
....- 'cc .... 0 0 en
jO:E.5ff.<
c
o
o
u
'" c
II) II)
11)"0
.... 'S;:
!t::uJ
o ~
.~ .~
oo.~
C en
o 0
-.::: >
S.:
D13
u"O
If 5
e ~ Cl
Eo-~U
~
-
co:
"'C
Q.
;;;J
~
~
~
~
~
ell
-;)
~
~
ell
o
Q.
o
~
~
'1:l:
-
C QC
::~"'l
I.~-
=r-"""
U
~
~
~
Q
CI.l
...
~
CI.l CI.l CI.l
.~ .~.~
'0'0'0
~~~
\0 r- 00
,..., ,..., ,...,
o CI.l
,~ .~
'0'0
~~
0\ 0
...... ~
a..l 0) (1) E
tJ:l ~ CI) ttS
~~~ ~ca C
"O~c 00Q)~~
.E - g. .E ~ ~ g-
~.E C1) E - .g
5c~ a:5x-rJJ
C. -=::l :::..'- ==
fOOCl) .c.r.l_-O
C ="'0 c"'C~~
g 0 = $2 ro _ _
.5~ --=~co
"g~~~~:-=~~
-....f-"'.... -,..::..fA
-= . .r--="'::"~o'-'
00""""""- 000 ;;> 0 t/)
::lV)OfA::lO CI.ll"'l e
Or-O\'-'ONCI:I~t:
l:ee3.=~.-::";'~
-EEe-EOE
't;;..._t:t)...V)...~
.:: ~ ~ ~ .:: ...::! ~ ~
.... t': C<l C<l.... C<l~ C<l~
o
o
0\.
00
N
~
(A
o
~
V)
N
o
~
o
o
-
~
~
0\
-
~
6
-
N
N
0\
(A
~
o
~
V)
r-
o
~
o
o
N
(A
(A
I ,
o
~
o
V)
o
o
6
o
-
~
(A
"""
o
o
N
~
o
o
N
E
...
C<l
<c
c
C<l
"'6'0
...
::l
!Xl
Q)
'"
ca
....
E
C<l
<c
c
CI.l
~
~
o
a.:
Q)
'"
~
....
CI.l
.;!
'0
~
I-
I"""
CI.l
.;!
"0
~
I
IN
i..".
00
00
N.
N N
fA ~
00
c:c:
"'0
- V)
N
~~
'" N
QC~
'" -
- -
r- -
fA ~
00
c:c:
'" 0
- 0
r- -
~ (A
00
C:~
00
o V)
V)
fA ~
\0\0
00
00
N N
CI.lca
Q) ...
.... CI.l
~j
.~ ~
U~
ca'-
t 0
ce =
....l .52 OJ;
- =
t g,'~
~ en C':l
CI:I":U
rIl '"
II) CI.l
() ()
'S;: 'E
Iii
I~ :;
..".
o
lI'l
o
=
..,.
r-
~
:f'
C'l
=
==
==
C'l
~
=
C
~
;;>
~
...
~
~
==
C;
-=
Eo-
Q)
OJ
IE
o
en
-...
<<>
CO
C<l
lijg
~O
C~
U~
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Altered License Fee
Date
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee to license an altered dog for 1 year will be increased from $15 to $20. Licenses for 2 years will be increased from $25 to
$30 and licenses for 3 years will be increased from $35 to $40.
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal License Supervisor
License Checker
Straight TIIT18
Labo
20.79
11
Depl. or Div.
Overhead
T olal Burdened
Labor CosVHr.
2.954 32.49
1.15 12.65
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Fringe T olal Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
8.75 29.54
0.50 11.50
Hours by
Position per Un
0.2
0.5
T OIal Labo
Costpe
6.50
6.33
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
12.82
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
License T aQ 0.35 1 0.35
Door Hanaer 0.1 1 0.1
Cash Receiot 0.1 1 0.1
Postaae 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.89
Other Costs (EquiDment, facilill rental. part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Computer Eauipment & Software 4.00 1 4.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 4.00
C
omparisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Les s) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 15.00 (5.00 -33.33%
Mareno Vallev 10.00 (10.00 -100.0%
Riverside County 8.00 (12.00 -150.0%
OOJ.
Total Service Direct Cost 18.71
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rete @ 13.21';' 2.47
Total Service CostlUnit 21.19
Recommended Fee 20.00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 1.19
CUlTent Fee Amount 15.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) 5.00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Account
4320
User Fee Description
Altered License Fee Refund
Date
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the refund amount from $25 to $50 that an pet owner can be refunded for spaying or neutering their
dog within 60 days of purchasing an unaltered pet license.
Position
~.. ~'o'...' ..f#l_~l~i .
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct
Labo Benefits Labor Cost
Personnel Costs
Dept. or Div.
Overhead
Total Burdened Hours by
Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit
Total Labor
Cost pe
NA
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
NA
Other Costs (EouiDment, facill~ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to Proposed Fee
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit
This is not an additional fee but a reduction
More (Less) than SIB.
Dollars Percentage
Total Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 13.21%
T DIal Service CostlUnit
Recommended Fee
I
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
GOl.
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Accou nt User Fee Description Date
Animal Control Department 124 4430 Delinquency Penalty (Licensing) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the penalty added to the cost of the pet license for failure to license from $15 to $20
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal License Supervisor
License Checker
8.75
0.50
29.54
11.50
2.954
1.15
o
o
o
o
o
Labor Cost/Hr.
Hours by
Position per Un'
Total Labo
32.49
12.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
18.06
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Cash Receipt 0.1 1 0.1
PostaQe 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.44
Other Costs (EQuipment, facilib rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparlsons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 15.00 (5.00) -33.33%
Moreno Vallev 18.00 (2.00) -11.1%
Riverside County 8.00 (12.00) -150.0%
00:3
Total Service Direct Cost 18.90
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 13.21% 2.50
Total Service CosVUnit 21 39
Recommended Fee 2000
Recommended Fee Subsidy 1 39
Current Fee Amount 15.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) 500
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentIDivision
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Replacement &Transfer Ta
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Increases the "additional tag issued to replace a lost, stolen misplaced or damaged tag" from $3 to $5
Increases the "transfer of ownership of a licensed dog to a new owner in lieu of a fee for new license" from $3 to $5
Increases the "transfer of a current license from another jurisdiction" from $3 to $5
Personnel Costs
I
Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labo
Benefits Labor Cost Ovemead Labor CostlHr. Position per U Cost pe
8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.2 6.50
0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.2 2.53
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 9.03
'..;:1...
'"' ,~:_L~!q'f.':f'1 ....
Position
Animal License Supervisor
License Checker
Straight Time
Labo
20.79
11
"'a18rial & Rental Costs
.ascription Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
License Tag 0.25 1 0.25
Door Hanaer 0.1 1 0.1
Cash Receipt 0.1 1 0.1
Postage 0.41 2 0.82
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.77
Other Costs (Equipment, facilltJ rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C ri
ompa sons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 5.00 - 0.00%
Moreno Vallev 3.00 (2.00 -66.7%
Riverside County 2.00 (3.00 -150.0%
004
Total Servtce Drrect Cos1 10.80
Ctty-Wide Gen. & Admin.
R.le ~ 13.21% 1.43
Total Service CaSVUnit l' n
Recommended Fee !'i 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 723
Current Fee Amount 300
Fee Increase (Decrease) '00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
I livestock Apprehension Fee - Greater Than
Animal Control 124 4759 500lbs 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the livestock (over 5001bs) apprehension fee from $50 to $150
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Control Supervisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Rep/Dips
Depl. or Oiv.
Overtlead
3.597
2.621
2.402
o
o
o
o
9.65
7.26
6.85
35.97
26.21
24.02
39.57
.28.83
26.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Position per Un
0.4
1
0.4
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
55.23
aterial & Rental Costs
Desaiption Cost Eaell Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle/Fuel/Maintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EquiomentlMaintenance 5 1 5.00
Specialized Haulina Eauipment 100 1 100.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 120.00
Other Costs (EQuiDment, faclllt rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Oesaiption Cost Eaell Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omDansons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 100.00 (50.00) -50.00%
Moreno Vallev 75.00 (75.00) -100.0%
Riverside County 90.00 (60.00) -66.7%
,
005
Totll Service Direct COlt
175.23
CIty.Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate G! 13.21%
Total service CostlUnlt
23.15
1 QR ~7
Recommended Fee
1~O 00
4837
5000
10000
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
Fee lnc;re8le (Oecre...)
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Lar e Livestock Board
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the large livestock daily board fee from $12.50 to $20.00
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Su erviso
Animal Shelter Attendant
Dept. or Div.
Overhead
3.039
2.289
o
o
o
o
o
8.92
6.64
30.39
22.89
Hours by
Position per Unit
0.2
0.4
Total Lebo
Cost pe
6.69
10.07
0.00
0.00
Labor CosllHr.
33.43
25.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
16.76
"aterial & Rental Costs
Alscription Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 8 1 8.00
8.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Les s than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 15.00 5.00 -33.33%
Moreno Valley 11.00 9.00 -81.8%
Riverside County 15.00 5.00 -33.3%
006
Total Servtce Direct Cost 24.76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rete 0 13.21% 3.27
T otel Service CosVUnil ?R 03
Recommended Fee ?O 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 803
Current Fee Amount 1250
Fee Increase (Decrease) 750
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Apprehension Fee
Date
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This eliminates the two tier Apprehension Fee for altered and unaltered pets and establishes a single fee of $100 for the first
apprehension, $200 for the second and $350 for the third
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Control Supervisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re /Dips
9.65
7.26
6.85
35.97
26.21
24.02
3.597
2.621
2.402
o
o
o
o
Labor CosllHr.
Hours by
Position per Un'
0.4
1
0.4
Total La
Cost
15.83
28.83
10.57
0.00
39.57
28.83
26.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
55.23
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Ouanllly Required Unit Cost
Vehicle/FuellMaintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EquipmentlMaintenance 5 1 5.00
Animal Care/Disposal 75 1 75.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 95.00
Other Costs (Equipment, faclllt1 rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Desaiption Cost Each Ouanllly Required UnK Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Les s) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 80.00 (20.00 -25.00%
Moreno Vallev 50.00 (50.00 -100.0%
Riverside County 35.00 (65.00 -185.7%
001
Tota, Service Direct Cost 150.23
Clly-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rite ~ 1321% 19.84
TOUII Service COS1/Un" 170.07
Recommended Fee 100.00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 70.07
Current Fee Amount varies
Fee Increase (Oecre.se) varies
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Board Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the daily board fee from $8.00 to $10.00
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Su
Animal Shelter Attendant
8.92
6.64
30.39
22.89
3.039
2.289
o
o
o
o
o
Hours by
PositiOn per Un
0.2
0.4
Total UIbo
Cost pe
6.69
10.07
0.00
0.00
33.43
25.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
16.76
,terial & Rental Costs
.scription Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facllltJ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Desaiption Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 9.00 (1.00) -11.11%
Moreno Valley 6.00 (4.00) -66.7%
Riverside County 15.00 5.00 33.3%
OaR
Tolal Service Direct co.t 21.76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Role CI! 13.21% 2.87
TOIaI Service CoIl/Unit ?4R~
Recommended Fee 1000
Recommended Fee Substcl)' 1463
Current Fee Amount 800
Fee "'ere..e (DecreaR) ? nn
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentlDivision
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Pick-U Service Char
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the fee charged for pick-up services from $25.00 to $50.00
Personnel Costs
~~~'~~~i4:1i!f~~~
Position
Animal Control Supervisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Rep/Dips
StrBighl Time
Lebo!
26.32
18.95
17.17
Fringe Total DIrecl
Benefits Labor Cost
Total Burdened
Labor CostlHr.
3.597 39.57
2.621 28.83
2.402 26.42
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Oepl. or Div.
Overhead
9.65 35.97
7.26 26.21
6.85 24.02
Hours by
Position per Unij
0.2
0.5
0.2
Total Labor
Cost per
7.91
14.42
5.28
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 27.61
laterial & Rental Costs
L.lesaiption Cost Each Quantity Required Un~ Cost
Vehicle/FueVMaintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio Equipment/Maintenance 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facUIt rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
P
omparlsons to rODosed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County varies varies varies
Moreno Valley varies varies varies
Riverside County varies varies varies
OO~j
Tolal Service Direct COst 47.61
City..Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @! 13.21% 6.29
Total Service CosVUnit !'i~ 90
Recommended Fee !'iOOO
Recommended Fee Subsidy 390
Current Fee Amount 2500
Fe. Increase (Decrease) ?!'iOO
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Ado tion Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This creates a single adoption fee of $30.00
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $25 to $30 for each dog or cat
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $40 to $30 for each puppy or kitten
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Su
Animal Shelter Attendant
8.92
6.64
30.39
22.89
3.039
2.289
o
o
o
o
o
33.43
25.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
16.76
'aterial & Rental Costs
.Jesaiption Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 5 25.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 25.00
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit1 rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Desaiplion Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
c
rl
P
F
ompa sons to roposed ee
More (Less I than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 20.00 (10.00) -50.00%
Moreno Vallev 30.00 - 0.0%
Riverside County 75.00 45.00 60.0%
010
T otel Service Direct Cosl 41.76
City.WKie Gen. & Admin.
Rlte@ 1321% 5.52
Total Service CosVUnit 4727
Recommended Fee 3000
Recommended Fee Subsidy 1727
Current Fee Amount varies
Fee Ine..... (Deer....) Vl'IriFlS
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentIDivision
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Quarantine Dai! Board
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the quarantine daily board fee from $10.00 to $15.00
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Superviso
Animal Shelter Attendant
8.92
6.64
30.39
22.89
3.039
2.289
o
o
o
o
o
Labor CDsVHr.
33.43
25.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Iftaterial & Rental Costs
JscriptiDn Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.00
Other Costs (Eaulpment, faclJlt rental, Dart.time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omDansons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 9.00 1.00 11.11%
Moreno Vallev 6.00 4.00 66.7%
Riverside County 15.00 (5.00) -33.3%
011
Totol ServiCe Dl'oct Cost 21.76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rote G 1321% 2.87
Total Servtce CostlUntt 7463
Recommended Fee 1~ 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 963
Current Fee Amount 1000
Fee Increase (Dec:rease) ~oo
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentlDivision
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Rabies Vaccination Deposit
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The rabies vaccination will be increased by $2 to cover the cost the contracted veterinarians charge to the City.
't
Personnel Costs
'~~:, '~;~lji;~.'
Position
Straight Tme
Lab
Fringe Total Oiled
Benefits Labor Cost
Oept. or Div.
Overhead
Total Burdened
Labor CostlHr.
NA
~1~terial & Rental Costs
.cription
Cost Each
QuanUty Required
Unit Cost
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part~time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Requtred Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
THIS IS A DEPOSIT ONLY
012
Total Service Direct COst 0.00
cny-W1do Gon. & Admin
R8Io Cll 13.21% 0.00
Total ServiCe CostlUnn nOD
Recommended Fee nOD
Rocommonclod Foe Sullslay 000
Current Fee Amount 000
Fee I"cruse (Decrease) nOD
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
epartmentlDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
City Clerk 001 4901 Yard Sale Permit Fee (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Nominal fee for issuance of yard sale permit
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe T 0181 m"ect Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by I T 0181 Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Posttion per Unit Cost per
Business Reg. Representative 20.72 6.22 26.94 2.6936 29.63 0.467 13.84
0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 13.84
Material & Rental Costs
I Description Cost Each Quamty Required Unit Cost
0
0
I
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facili y rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quanttty Required Unit Cost
0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
C
P
dF
ompansons to ropose ee
More (Less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Permit Fee Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino nla nla
Redlands 2.50 (12.50 -83.3%
Ontario 3.00 (12.00 -80.0%
Fontana 8.00 (7.00 -46.7%
Yucaipa 2.50 (12.50 -83.3%
01 ~~
T 0181 Service OIrect CosI 1384
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
RaleO 11.93% 1.65
T aiel Service CostlUntt Hi 4Q
Recommended Fee 1!; on
Reoomm8l'\CMd Fee Subeidy 049
Cummt Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) 1!; on
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Descriotion Date
.
Code Enforcement 001 4743 Vehicle Tow Release Fees 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. This fee was first adopted by Code Enforcement in 2008 to mirror the fee charged by
the Police Department for the same service. CVC 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as GTA are
not charaed and can obtain a release 7 davs a week 8am-7om. All other releases can be obtained M-F 7:30-5:30 om. The current
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by T olal Labor
Position Labor Banefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Un; Cost per
Code Comoliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Sr.lSuD Officer 57.03 17.11 74.14 7.4139 81.55 0.25 20.39
Code Enf. Processina Asst 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 1 29.66
Admin. Svcs. SUDer. 34.15 10.245 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.25 $12.21
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 159.92
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Photos $2.00 4 $8.00
Reaular Mailinas 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 8.84
Other Costs (Eauioment, faclll tv rental, part-time labor w/o benefits) .
Description Cost Each Quanlily Required Unit Cost
Vehicle ExPense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 40.00
Comparisons to Prooosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino n/a nla
lollll Service Direct COlt 208 76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rete C!! 10.91% 22.78
Totll Service ColWnIt '~1 1;4
Recommended Fee ,~O 00
Recommended FR SubIiDr 154
Current Fee Amount 21500
Fee Inete8.e (Decrea.e) Hi 00
011
User Fee Oetennination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Code Enforcement 001 4411 Removal of Unauthorized Signs (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Direct costs incurred for removal of unauthorized signs. Recommended fee is for removal per sign. If an ordinance amendment is
approved to remove the certified mail requirement, costs would be reduced by $5.21, but the $100 fee per sign would still be
'ustified.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Oept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefrts Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosllHr. Position per UnJ1 Cost per
Code Comoliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.4 19.53
Sr.lSuo Officer 43.87 13.16 57.03 5.7031 62.73 0.2 12.55
Code Enf. Processina Asst 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 0.5 14.83
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 46.91
Material & Rental Costs
I
I Description Cost Each Quantity Required Un" Cost
-;ertified Mailings 5.21 1 5.21
.~eaular Mailinas 0.42 2 0.84
I
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 6.05
Other Costs (EauiDment, Jacili tv rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
I Desaip\ion Cost Each Quantlty Required Unit Cost
Vehicle Exoense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 40.00
C
omDarisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nla nla
Riverside 100.00 0.00 0.0%
Corona 80.00 (20.00) -20.0%
01~
Total Service onct Cool 9296
CIty.Wlde Gen. & Admin.
Rite 0 10.91" 10.14
T olal Service eosUUnH 10~ 10
Recommended Fee 10000
Recommended F.. SubI6dy 310
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) 10000
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
..-epartment/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Code Enforcement 001 4735 Release of Notice of Pendency Fee 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
A Notice of Pendency is a document that is recorded with the County Recorder's office to notify any potential buyer and/or lender
that there is some type of administrative action pending against the property and/or there is a lien against the property. This is an
administrative fee for releasing a notice of pendency for costs incurred. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries,
and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has not been updated in accordance with increases in salaries
and materials since 1996.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Slraight Time Fringe T olal Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by T olal Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cosl Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cosl per
Code Compliance Officer II $34.15 $10.25 $44.40 $4.44 $48.83 2 $97.67
Code Compliance Proc. Asst. $20.74 $6.22 $26.96 $2.70 $29.66 2 $59.32
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $156.99
Material & Rental Costs
'saiption Cost Each Quantity Required Unll Cost
lailinQs $0.42 2 $0.84
I
I
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.84
Other Costs IEauioment, facirtv rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
DeScription Cost Each Quantity RequinKI Unit Cost
County Recorder Fee $13.00 1 $13.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 13.00
Comparisons to Prooosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentage
Not available
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Tot.1 Service OiJ"ecl eo.t
169 99
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
R.te @ 10.91%
Tot.1 Service eolUUnK
18.55
1 REI fi~
Cunent Fee Amount
1 RO 00
853
94.00
RFl 00
Recommended Fee
Recommen~ Fee SUbsidy
Fe. Inere... (Deere...)
016
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
.JepamnentlDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Administrative fee for private property building
Code Enforcement 001 4733 abatements resulting in a lien against a property 4/2112009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This $95 administrative fee IS added to the total amount of the hearing costs when these costs have not been paid in the time given
to the property owner and the hearing order is processed. The total amount is then placed as a lien against the property. The
proposed fee modification is to reflect increases in salaries and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has
not been uodated in accordance with increases in salaries and materials since 1996.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or ON. Total Burdened Hours by Total L.aboI
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostIHr. Posftlon per Unit Cost pe
Administrative Assistant $24.09 $7.23 $31.32 $3.13 $34.45 3 $103.35
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $103.35
Material & Rental Costs
I Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
'ailinas $0.42 2 $0.84
rinting/copies/receipts/reoortl $0.10 7 $0.70
Ifax cover sheet/County Recorder)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.54
Other Costs (Equipment, facili tv rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each I Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
c
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino 120.00 .
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
Total SenriC4l Oirect eol'
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate G 10.91%
Total Service COlt/Unit
104 89
11.44
11fi 33
Recommenoed Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
11500
133
9500
:moo
Recommended Fee
01/
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee DescriDtion Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733 Administrative fee for request for demand letter 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
When Code enforcement places a lien on a property, they file a Notice of Pendency with the County Auditor-Controller Recorder
(ACR). When an individual or company tries to buy, sell, refinance, etc they may be noticed by the ACR's Office the property may
show a lien. A demand letter is typically requested from an escrow company during the sale/transfer/refinance of property, which
details total amount owed to the City for liens, administrative citations or other charges pending against a property. Currently, the
City collects a $10 administrative fee for preparing a demand letter and $5 for each additional line item fee that includes abatement
costs, existing citations and hearing orders that have not yet been liened and a calculation of any interest owed on each of the debts.
Based on the average demand letter containing 5 additional line items ($5 for each item), for a total of approximately $35 per
demand letter. Updating these fees for personnel costs would bring the combined fee to $100 for the creation of a demand letter (no
charges for additional lines).
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe T alai Oirect Oept. or Dlv. T alai Burdened Houn; by Total Labo
Position Labol Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost pel
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.13 34.45 2.5 86.13
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 86.13
Material & Rental Costs
Desaiption Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Printing /copieslfax $0.10 7 $0.70
cover sheet)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.7
Other Costs (Eauipment, facill tV rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
c
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
Other jurisdictions do not prel are demand letters.
018
T olal Service Direct eoll 8683
Clly-WICIe Gen. & Admin.
Rate G 10.91% 9.47
Total Service eostlUnK Qfi ~O
Recommended Fee Q~nO
RKOmmended F" sublkiy 130
Curren1 Fee Amount 1000
Fee InereBse (Deere.le) 8~nO
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
.JepartmentlDivision Fund Account User Fee DescriDtion Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733* Duplicate Release of Lien fee 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The $20 fee is an administrative fee for producing a Duplicate Release of Lien. This occurs when our department previously
complied with a request for a demand letter, the lien was paid through escrow, and a release was issued that was not recorded by
the party receiving the original release. The request must also be researched for additional fees owing and interest re-calculated.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by T alaI Labor
Position Lebo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost pel
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.1317 34.45 0.75 25.84
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 25.84
Material & Rental Costs
criplion Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
I' finting /copieslfax $0.10 3 $0.30
IcoversheeO
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.3
Other Costs (Equipment, facili tv rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
C
omDarisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino 30.00 0
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
· Account No. 001-0004733 is used for building abatement fees
Account No. 001-000-4411 is used for administrative citation fees
D1rt
Total Service Olrect Cost 2614
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rote Illi 10.91% 2.85
T 0181 Service Cost/Unit ?RQs:l
Recommended Fee ?ROO
Recommended F.. SUbsldy 099
Current fee Amount 2000
Fee Increase {Decr..se} ROO
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
uepartmentlDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement
Code Enforcement 001 4815 liens on vacant lots 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement liens against properties whose owners have failed to pay the abatement costs for
vacant lots. There has been no fee increase since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries, and other
administrative costs associated with this orocess.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead LabOr CosllHr. PosKion per UnK Cost per
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 92.81
Material & Rental Costs
Desaiption Cost Each Quantity Required UnK Cost
Mailinas 0.42 3 1.26
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.26
Other Costs fEauiDment, facili tv rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Co51
0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
ComDarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino nla nfa
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
T atal Service Di..ct Cost 92 81
CJty-Wode Gen. & Admin.
Rote C 10.91%
T ot.1 Service CostlUnlt
10.13
1 O? Q~
Recommended F.. SUbaldy
Current Fee Amount
10n nn
293
1950
Rn5n
Recommended Fee
Fee InCI'1I8se (Deere..e)
O l) ,"'
r..:... '
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeparbnentlDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Administrative fee for weed abatement on vacant
Code Enforcement 001 4815 lots 4/2112009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Administrative fee for weed abatement incurred costs and staff time for processing abatements. There has been no fee increase
since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries, and other administrative costs associated with this process.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Code Compliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 190.48
Material & Rental Costs
I Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
I Mailinas 0.42 5 2.1
I
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2.1
Other Costs (Equipment, facir I:v rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Desaiption Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle Expense 30 30.00 2.00 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 60.00
C
P
dF
ompansons to ropose ee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nla nla
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
TOla' Service Direct eoll
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate lID 10.91%
Totll Service Cost/Unit
250 48
27.33
277 Rn
Recommended Fee Subaldy
275 no
280
11000
165 nn
Recommended Fee
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Deere.,e)
021
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 188 4780 More than 3 WQMP Reviews (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, public safety, or adequate water quality best practices. The recommended fee is
$99.00 per hour. This represents review time for the NPDES Coordinator, the City Engineer, and the NPDES Customer
Service Rep.
Personnel Costs
Position
NPDES Customer Service Rep.
NPDES Coordinator
Ci En ineer
23.19
48.98
80.68
5.10224
10.77648
17.74916
Hours by
Position per Un
0.5
1
0.05
Total Labo
Cost pe
14.15
59.76
4.92
28.29
59.76
98.43
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 78.83
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaae
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs CEauiDment, facllltJ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 99.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev Preliminary) $ 321.00 3rd Review $ 222.00 224%
Moreno Valley Basic Final) $ 750.00 3rd Review $ 651.00 658%
Moreno Valley Standard Final) $1,440.00 3rd Review $ 1,341.00 1355%
~oreno Valley. Complex Final) $1,824.00 3rd Review $ 1,725.00 1742%
I
I T
02~:
Total Service Direct Cost $ 78.83
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@21.01% $ 16.56
Total Service CosVUnil $ 9900
Recommended Fee $ 9900
Recommended Fee Subsidy $
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 9900
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepamnentlDivision
Development Services
Account
4351
User Fee Description
Blanket/Combo Permit (New Fee)
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
A combo permit would combine the excavation permit ($45) and lane closure permit ($45) that contractors typically pull together.
The cost of the combined permit would be $53. The combo permit would allow the contractors to pull one permit saving the City
and contractors time. Development Services staff estimates there is a proposed revenue loss of $10,900. The blanket permit can
be issued to public utilities and combines the lane closure permit and the excavation permit into one permit. This fee covers the
time it takes counter personnel to enter the information into the computer and create the permit. A blanket permit may be issued
pursuant to Section 12.03.070(8) of the City Municipal Code for minor work and emergency work. That same section defines
minor work and emergency work. A blanket permit cannot be issued for work within arterial or collector roads. Minor and/or
emeraencv work under a blanket Dermit may not exceed 16 square feet and is valid for 12 months from date of issuance.
Personnel Costs
'".fi~
Dept. or DiY.
Overhead Labor CostlHr.
31.28 6.88116 38.16
34.55 7.60188 42.16
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 44.48
Hours by
Position per Un~
1
15%
T0I81
Cost
38.16
6.32
0.00
0.00
Material & Rental Costs
Desctlption Cost Each Quantity Required UnIICost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Desaiption Cost e8ch Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B. To'" Service Dired eo'l $ 44.48
Jurisdiction Fee er Unit Dollars Percentage City.Wide Gen. II Admin.
San Bernardino $ 53.00 n1a n1a R.te Ci 21.01% $ 9.35
Corona $ 80.00 $ 27.00 51% T atal Service CaIVUnit $ 5~ R3
Ontario $ 85.00 $ 32.00 60%
Redlands $ 216.00 $ 163.00 308% Recommended Fee $ 5~OO
;emecula $ 338.00 Annual $ 285.00 538% Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 083
ITemecula $ 39.00 MonthlY $ (14.00) -26% Cu....' Fee Amount $
Chino $ 177.00 $ 124.00 234% Foe Inere..e (Decre..e) S; 5300
02;~
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 4352 Permit Extension (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
There are circumstances when a contractor needs to extend the permit time frame; staff enters the extension request into
Permit Plus and verifies with the Construction Manager that the extension is warranted. The recommended fee is $43.00.
This is based on 0.2 hours of review time by the Construction Manager and documentation time by staff.
Personnel Costs
7.22
7.97
12.49
31.28
34.55
54.13
6.88116
7.60188
11.90904
o
o
o
o
38.16
42.16
66.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Position per Un'
0.55
0.05
0.2
T etaf Labo
Costpe
20.99
2.11
13.21
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
36.30
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
c
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 43.00
-
02~
Total Service Direct Cost $ 36.30
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate 021.01% $ 7.63
Total Service CosVUnlt $ 4393
Recommended Fee $ 4300
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.93
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 4300
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 Various More than 3 Plan Checks (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, or public safety. The recommended fee is $85.00 per hour. This represents review
time for an Engineering Assistant III, the Senior Civil Engineer, the City Engineer, and the Developmen.t Services Tech.
The account will vary based on the type of plan being checked.
Personnel Costs
7.22
10.23
14.51
18.62
31.28
44.34
62.87
80.68
6.88116
9.75546
13.83096
17.74916
o
o
o
Labor Cost/Hr.
Hours by
Position per Un'
0.1
1
0.1
0.05
Total Labo
Cost pe
3.82
54.10
7.67
4.92
38.16
54.10
76.70
98.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 70.51
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (EauiDment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omDarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ~ er Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 85.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
Temecula $ 93.00 Per Sheet $ 8.00 $ 0.09
Moreno Valley (Maps) $ 190.00 Per Sheet $ 105.00 $ 1.24
Moreno Vallev (Improvements) $ 248.00 Per Sheet $ 163.00 $ 1.92
Moreno Valley (Grading) $ 207.00 Per Sheet $ 122.00 $ 1.44
025
Total Service Direct Cost $ 70.51
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate C!! 21.01... $ 14.81
Total Service CosUUnit $ 8532
Recommended Fee $ 8500
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.32
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 8500
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 184 Account Blanket Inspection Fee ( New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to utility companies to inspect the work covered under the blanket permit, 16 square fee. The recommended
fee is $73.00. This is based on one hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II and .18 hours of a Construction
ISurvey Manager's time. Not all cities have adopted a separate fee, it is included in the permit. The inspection typically
I includes a morning inspection and an afternoon inspection
Personnel Costs
9.26
12.49
40.13
54.13
8.82882
11.90904
o
o
o
o
o
Labor CostlHr.
Hours by
Position per Un'
1
0.18
Total Labo
Cost pe
48.96
11.89
0.00
0.00
48.96
66.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 60.85
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
PostaQe
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs IEauiDment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omDansons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee s: er Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 73.00 N/A N/A
Corona Full Cost N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev $ 15.00 Per Location $ (58.00l -0.79452055
Ontario Included in perm it fee N/A N/A
~ula $ 194.00 $ 121.00 166%
Lt...,..) $ 177.00 $ 104.00 142%
02b
Tolel Service Direct Cosl $ 60.85
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rale C!l21.01% $ 12.78
T olal Service CostlUnil 5) 7363
Recommended Fee 5) 7300
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.63
Current Fee Amount $
Fea Increase (Decrease) 5) 7300
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 184 Various Public Works Re-Inspection (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The current fee covers one inspection and there are many times when the inspector is called to a site by the contractor and
the contractor is not there or the site is not ready for inspection and then is requested to revisit the site. The original
inspection fee is based on a percentage of the cost estimate. The recommended fee is $59.00. This represents one hour of
inspection time for a Construction Inspector II. Moreno Valley based their fee on a 4 hour minimum. Not all cities have
established this fee. The account will vary based on the type of inspection being performed.
Dept. or Div. Hours by
Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit
40.13 8.82882 48.96 1
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
Personnel Costs
Position
Construction Inspector II
9.26
Material & Rental Costs
48.96
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaae
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
c
t P
dF
ompansons 0 ropose ee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 59.00 N/A N/A
Moreno Valley $ 432.00 Each $ 373.00 632%
r
09""'"
'- ,
Tol81 Service Direct Coat $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rale ~21.01% $ 10.29
Total Service CoslNnll $ 59.25
Recommended Fee $ 59.00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.25
Currenl Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 59.00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 183 Account TCO Inspection (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to an applicant who is requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant is required to post
a bond to insure all outstanding work is finished. The recommended fee amount is $520.00. This fee is based 2.5 hours
of field review time by the Construction/Survey Manager, 2.5 hours of review time by the City Engineer and 0.5 hours of
documentation time by the Director. No other Cities have established this fee because it is not always standard practice.
Personnel Costs
54.13
80.68
31.28
11.90904
17.74916
6.88116
o
o
o
o
12.49
18.62
7.22
Total Labo
Cost pe
165.10
246.07
19.08
Labor CostlHr.
Hours by
Position per Un
2.5
2.5
0.5
66.04
98.43
38.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
430.25
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each QUllntity Required Unit Cost
Postaae
Total other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs lEauiDment, facillt rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Elich Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other 'Costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
MorelLess) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 520.00 N/A N/A
f-
028
Total Service Direct Cost $ 430.25
C"y-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate C 21.01% $ 90.40
T Olal Service CosllUM ~ fi'O 65
Recommended Fee ~ fi'O 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.65
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Oecrease) ~ fi,n 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New Inspection for a TUP/CUP Bond Release
Development Services 183 Account (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This is an inspection fee charged to applicants who requested a Temporary Use Permit or a Conditional use Permit. The
inspection is required before the applicant's cash bond can be returned. The recommended fee is $59.00. This represents
1 hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II. No other cities have established this fee as it is included in .the
application fee.
Personnel Costs
_" _~~.~. .,;1.,. tl..~ifii.i.~~lir~~'
Position
Construction Inspector II
40.13
8.82882
o
o
o
o
o
o
9.26
Total Burde
Labor Cost/Hr.
Hours by
Position per Un
48.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
48.96
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
ompansons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 59.00 N/A N/A
I
028
Total Service Oirec\ Cost $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rale G 21.01 % $ 10.29
Total Service CostlUnit $ 5925
Recommended Fee $ fi9 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.25
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increese (Oecreese) $ 5900
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 Various Revisions to Approved Plans (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who request changes to their plans after the plans have been through the
plan check process and have signed mylars. The recommended fee is $137.00 per sheet. This fee represents review time
for a Senior Civil Engineer, a Construction/Survey Manager and documentation time for a Development Services Tech.
Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a consultant.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time
La
48.36
24.06
41.64
Labor CostlHr.
Hours by
Position per Un'
14.51
7.22
12.49
62.87
31.28
54.13
13.83096
6.88116
11.90904
o
o
o
o
76.70
38.16
66.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
113.54
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs fEauiDment, facllit 1I rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost $ 113.54
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
San Bernardino $ 137.00 Per Sheet N/A NtA Rate 0 21 .01..l. $ 23.85
Corona $ 625.00 Per Sheet $ 624.61 456% Total Service CostlUnll $ 13739
T emecula $ 241.00 Per Sheet $ 104.00 76%
Chino $ 614.00 $ 477.00 348% Recommended Fee $ 137 00
~A~reno Valley (MinorY $ 261.00 Per Sheet $ 124.00 91% Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.39
r 10 Valley (Maior) $ 269.00 Per Sheet $ 132.00 96% Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) S 137 00
03(1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepilrtmentlDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 4782 Certificate of Correction (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who have non-substantive changes to their tract/parcel maps after the maps
have been signed and recorded. The recommended fee is $97.00, minimum one hour. This represent 1 hour of review
time for a Senior Civil Engineer. Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a
consultant.
Personnel Costs
;t'.r~k. ~
....~ -.
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
~.,,.,..,~...,..,~._;.,,,. . ""'!'.'~"
, , ..~.,..' '~.Y.' _.' - - ,...~'~.- fr" 7";
. ':......, "'~'* .. ".' -> :~ '&
Depl or Div. Total Burdened
Overhead Labor CoSVHr.
Hours by
Position per Un'
1
0.1
Total Lebo
Cost pe
76.70
3.82
0.00
0.00
48.36 14.51 62.87 13.83096 76.70
24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 80.51
~al & Rental Costs
Oe"....."oon Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaae
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (EauiDment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C omDarlsons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost $ 80.51
Jurisdiction Fee ~ er Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
San Bernardino $ 97.00 Per Hour N/A N/A Rete ~ 21.01% $ 16.92
Corona $ 735.00 $ 638.00 658% Total Service CosVUnit $ 9743
Temecula $ 651.00 $ 554.00 571%
Moreno Vallev $ 496.00 $ 399.00 411% Recommended Fee $ 9700
Ontario $ 334.00 $ 237.00 244% Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.43
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decreese) $ 9700
03J
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 188 Account NPDES Business Inspection (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
As required by the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS-4) staff is required inspect all businesses to
insure they are in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The recommended fee is
$143.00. This represents .40 hours of documentation time for the NPDES Customer Service Rep, 2 hours of inspection time for
the NPDES I.nspector and .15 hours of review time by the NPDES Coordinator. The permit is a federal requirement and
regulated at the State and regional level.
Personnel Costs
Depl or Div. Hours by Total Labo
Overtlead Position per Un' Cost pe
5.35 23.19 5.10224 28.29 0.4 $ 11.32
9.26 40.13 8.82882 48.96 2 $ 97.92
0 0.00 $
37.68 11.30 48.98 10.77648 59.76 0.15 $ 8.96
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $ 118.20
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
.
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: $ -
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit I rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
c
omparlsons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 143.00 N/A N/A
Ontario (Commercial) $ 171.00 Average $ 28.00 20%
Ontario (Industrial) $ 263.66 Average $ 120.66 84%
,... ~Iands $ 71.00 $ (72.00) -50%
\0 Valley (Industrial) $ 451.00 $ 308.00 215%
Moreno Valley (Commercial) $311.00 $ 168.00 117%
Moreno Valley (Restaurant) $ 271.00 $ 128.00 90%
n~>
Total Service Direct Cost $ 118.20
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate ~ 21.01% $ 24.83
Total Service CosUUnlt $ 143 04
Recommended Fee $ 14300
Recommended Fee SubSidy $ 0.04
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 14300
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 184 Account Billing Fee (New Fee) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently staff provide a service to the utility companies by billing them a monthly invoice for permits as no charge. The
recommended fee is $59.00 per invoice. This represents 1.5 hours of review time for an Administrative Assistant.
No other cities have established this fee. When a utility requests monthly billing, this fee will be applied to cover the cost
of preparing the monthly invoice.
Personnel Costs
tL~"',"~, ~.
Straight Time
La
20.72
Position
Administrative Assistant
Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labo
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Un' Costpe
6.22 26.94 5.92592 32.86 1.5 49.29
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
49.29
Material & Rental Costs
Desaiption Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
PostaQe
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (EauiDment, facllitJ rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
t P
dF
omparlsons 0 ropose ee
More (Less ) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 59.00 N/A N/A
Total Service Direct Cost $ 49.29
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rete@21,01% $ 10.36
Total Service CosllUnlt $ 5965
Recommended Fee $ 5900
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.65
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decreese) $ 5900
03~)
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee DescriDtion Date
Large Family Day Care (9-14 Children) -Initial
Fire 001 4336 LicensinQ Pre-Inspection Fee. 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up. issuance of permit. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State
requlations, has orooosed to modify insoection fees for care facilities
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Djv. ~ etal Burdened Hours by Total labOr
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Fire Prevention Officer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Supplies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.60
Other Costs CEQulDment, faclllt rental, Dart.tlme labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle 40.00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarlsons to Proposed Fee
More (less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
N/A
Total Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
ReI. @ 9.31"
Total Service CoetfUntt
123.60
11.51
13510
F""lncre... (Dea...e)
5000
8510
21203
-16'03
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Cumlnt Fee Amount
0311
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Fire 001 4336 Residential - Board and Care 6 or fewer 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permit. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State
reaulations, has proposed to modify insoection fees for care facilities
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor 8enerrts Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unij Cost per
Fire Prevention Officer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost EaCh Quantity Required Unit Cost
Supplies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.60
Other Costs (Equipment, facili~ rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost EaCh Quantity Required Unij Cost
Vehicle 40.00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
ompansons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
N/A
Total Service Direct Cost
Ctty-Wide Gen, & Admin.
Ral. @ 9.31%
Total Service CoaVUnit
123.60
11.51
1:1!'i 10
Fee Increase (Decrease)
5000
8510
21203
-16' 0:1
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
CUlTonf Fee Amount
03 ~)
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4743 Tow Release 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. CVC 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as
GTA are not charged. and can obtain a release 7 days a week, 8am-7pm. All other release can be obtained M-F. 8am-4pm.
The current fee is $215.00.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.25 7.10
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.25 9.64
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.33 88.29
Community Service Officer II 21.77 8.95 30.72 3.07 33.79 1.25 42.24
SerQeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 188.47
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Requinad Unit Cost
Police ReDort Fee 0.15 5 0.75
Certified PostaQe 3.94 2 7.88
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.88
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
c
omparlsons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino 215.00 nla nla
Ontario PD 125.00 (105.00 -45.7%
Corona PD 155.00 (75.00 -32.6%
Redlands PD 175.00 (55.00 -23.9%
Pomona PD 100.00 (130.00 -56.5%
Riverside 205.00 (10.00 -4.3%
Total Service Direct Coat
209.35
City-Wid. Gen. & Admin.
Rot.@ 10.30%
Totel Service CostlUrit
21.56
?~O 9:1
Fee Inor..M (09'C;fOBH)
nonn
0.91
21500
1" nn
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
CurTtlnt Fee Amount
036
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4741 Police Photographs on CD 4/30/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for providing Police photos on a CD (in-house photos)
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Forensic Specialist" 27.94 1 0.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 1 42.27
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 42.27
Material & Rental Costs
Description leost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
blank CD 0.50 1 0.50
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.50
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, Dart-time labor wfo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
c
t P
dF
ompartsons 0 ropose ee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino Sheriff $2.00 per image nfa nfa
Riverside PO 9.00 CD 38.00 -80.9%
Ontario PO 15.00 CD 32.00 -68.1%
Fontana PD 32.00 CD 15.00 -31.9%
Chino PD 35.00 CD 12.00 -25.5%
I
Total Service Direct Cost 4277
City-WIde Gen & Admin.
Rate@ 10.30% 4.41
Total Service CosWnrt 471R
Recommended Fee 47 on
RClXImmendcd Fee subl~y 0.18
Current Fe. Amount 000
Fee Increase (Decrease) 47 nn
037
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4741 Police Photographs on CD Requiring Lab Assistance 4f21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for transferring Police photo negatives to CD. This process requires the use of an outside lab and employee time to
transport and pick up requested work. Lab prices are $5.95 for first roll of film, $3.95 for each additional.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Dlv. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Forensic Specialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 1.00 42.27
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 42.27
Material & Rental Costs
Description ICost Each Quantity Required UnltCosl
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Lab Fee first roll of film 5.95 5.95
lab fee additional rolls 3.95
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.95
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino Sheriff $2.00 per image nla nla
Riverside PD 9.00 CD 44.00 -83.0%
Ontario PD 15.00 CD 38.00 -71.7%
Fontana PO 32.00 CD 21.00 -39.6%
Chino PD 35.00 CD 18.00 -34.0%
I
Total Service Direct Cost
48.22
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ to.30%
Total Service CostlUntt
4.97
5~ 1Q
Rec;ommendttd F.. Subaidy
5300
0.19
0.00
5~OO
Recommended Fee
CUlT8nt Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
03k
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4743 Traffic Citation Sign-off fees 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Police Officers issue traffic citations to the motoring public who operate vehicles with mechanical violations. These violations
must be corrected and signed off by police officers prior to the public contacting the court. Currently the Police Department
does not charge a fee for personnel to inspect vehicles, verify corrections have been made and sign off the citation.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Tune Fringe Total DIrect Depl. or Oiv. Total Burdened Hours by T alai Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CoslIHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Community Service Officer I 22.74 9.13 31.87 1.75 33.62 0.33 11.09
Lieutenant - Watch Commander 62.8673 27.68 90.55 4.75 95.30 0.1 9.53
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 20.62
Material & Rental Costs
Desaiplion Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (EQuiDment, faclllt rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Desaiption Cost Each Quantity Required Unft Cosl
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C rI
omDa sons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino nla nla
Ontario PO 0.0%
Corona PO (20.00 -100.0%
Redlands PO (20.00 -100.0%
Pomona PO (20.00 -100.0%
Total Service Direct COlt 2062
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Ral. \!!I 10.30% 2.12
lotll Service COSVUnit ?? 7~
Recommended Fee '0 no
Recommended Fee Substdy 275
Current Fee Amount 000
FI'e Increue (DcI;re8sc) '000
03C
,t
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4741 Recorded Investigative Evidence on CD 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing recorded investigative evidence (interviews, taped info) to CD.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. T alai Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefrts Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Police Detective 45.67 18.27 63.94 6.39 70.33 0.25 17.58
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 17.58
Material & Rental Costs
Description ICost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Blank CO 0.50 1 0.50
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.50
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part.time labor wfo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
t P
dF
ompansons 0 ropose ee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino 19.00 nfa nfa
Riverside PO 9.00 CO (10.00) -52.6%
Ontario PO 15.00 CD (4.00) -21.1%
Fontana PO 32.00 CO 13.00 68.4%
Chino PO 35.00 CO 16.00 84.2%
Total Service Direct Cost 1808
City-Wide Gen & Admin.
Rale@ 10.30% 1.86
Total Service CosVUnit 19 Qi'i
Recommended Fee 1900
Recommended Fee Subsidy 095
Current Fee Amount 000
Fee Increase (Decrease) 1900
040
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false burglary alarm calls. Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines incurred for permitted
locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1 st to 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th-9th false alarm will be $90 and the 10th and subseauent false alarm $175.
Fees have not been increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Oept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total labor
Position labor Benefits labor Cost Overhead labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Disoatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.5 19.28
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 0.5 33.19
Seraeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.25 20.60
Senior Office Assistant 19.84 7.96 27.80 2.78 30.58 0.33 10.09
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 83.16
Material & Rental Costs
Oesaiption Cost Eaell Quantity Required UnltCoSI
Postaae 0.42 1 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.42
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilitl rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Desaiption Cost Eaell Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omDarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentag
SBPD 75.00 nla nla
Riverside PD Fine #5 75.00 0.00 0.0%
Pomona PD #5 220.00 145.00 193.3%
Newport Beach PD - Fine #5 125.00 50.00 66.7%
Irvine PD #5 150.00 75.00 100.0%
Ontario #5 150.00 75.00 100.0%
HuntinQton Beach #5 200 125.00 166.7%
Total Service Direct Cost 83.58
e
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 10.30% 8.61
Total Service Cost/Un<< 9' 1 9
Recommended Fee 7500
Recommended Fee Subsidy 17. 19
Currant Fee Amount 50 00
Fe. Increa.e (Decrease) 25 00
041
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Police
Fund
001
User Fee Description
False Robbery Alarm Fines
Date
4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false robbery alarm calls. Unit cost for each false alarm. No tines incurred for permitted
locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1st to 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th-6th false alarm will be $250. 7th-9th will be $300 and the 10th and
subsequent false alarm $350. Fees have not been increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per UnH Cost per
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.75 28.92
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.67 110.86
Sergeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20
Senior Office Assistant 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 190.35
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Eech antity Required Unit Cost
Postage 0.42 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.42
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
DeScription Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparlsons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentac
SBPD 175.00 nla nla
Riverside PO Fine #5 300.00 100.00 50.0%
Newport PO #5 125.00 (75.00) -37.5%
Irvine #5 150.00 (50.00) -25.0%
Ontario #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
Huntington Beach #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
T alai Service Direct Cosl
e City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate @ 10.30%
Tolal Service CosVUnit
190.77
19.65
21041
Recommended Fee SubSIdy
Currenl Fee Amount
200 00
10.41
100.00
100 00
Recommended Fee
Fee Increase (Decrease)
042
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Public Services 132 4820 Sewer Lateral Capping Fee (City Crew) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently, staff charges an applicant who is requesting sewer lateral capping services $500, the cost of the contractor who
performs the work. To recover the costs of City personnel and administrative overhead needed to inspect the sewer lateral
capping services performed by the contractor, Public Services is proposing to increase the fee by $300.
Personnel Costs
~.
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
10.84 41.81
5.95 22.95
Depl or Div.
Overhead
Total Burdened
Labor CostfHr.
Hours by
Position per Unl
2
0.25
Position
Sewer Maintenance Supervisor
IW Customer Service Rep.
Straight Time
Labo
30.97
17
4.18095
2.295
o
o
o
o
45.99
25.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
98.29
-trial & Rental Costs
....--
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitv rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Iauantity Required Unit Cost
Contractor Cost 500.00 1 500
Fleet Charoes Vehicle 539 15.5 3 46.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 546.50
C ompansons to P rODose d Fee
More (Less) than S.~. Total Service Direct Cost $ 644.79
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
San Bernardino N/A N/A N/A Rale @ 11.02% $ 71.06
Riverside Insoection only $300 $148.50 N/A T olal Service CosVUnit $ 715 85
Rialto Inspection only $157 $148.50 N/A
Redlands Inspection only $282 $148.50 N/A Recommended Fee $ 715 00
Lorna Linda N/A N/A N/A Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.85
Moreno Valley N/A N/A N/A Current Fee Amount $ 500.00
''2rio N/A N/A N/A Fee Increase (Decrease) $ '15 00
043
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Sewer Lateral Inspection Fee ( Private
Public Services 132 4820 Contractor) 4/21/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently, staff 'charges $50.00 for sewer lateral inspection services performed by a private contractor. Staff recommends
that the fee be increased by an additional $50.00, to recoup the $100 cost to the City for these services. Contractor
charges the City $100.00 per inspection.
Personnel Costs
Position
Inspector Costs
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Labor CostlHr. osition per Un'
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0.00 1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
100.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each antlty Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to ProDosed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Riverside
Rialto
,forona
, Linda
l\" _ . 10 Vallev
Ontario
More (Less) than S.B.
Dollars Percentaae
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
Fee per Unit
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
04/1
T atal Service Direct Cost $ 1 00.00
City-Wide Gen, & Admin,
Rate@ ",02% $ 11.02
Total Service Cost/Unit $ 111 02
Recommended Fee $ 100 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 11.02
Current Fee Amount $ 50.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 50 00