HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-Development Services
ORIGINAL
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From:
Valerie C. Ross, Director
Subject:
Resolutions approving Project Baseline
Agreement No. C09021 with SANBAG and
Funding Agreement with the San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority for a Grade
Separation at Palm Avenue over the BNSF
Railroad (CIP Project No. SS04-53).
Dept:
Development Services
Date:
August 20, 2008
MCC Date: September 2, 2008
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
None.
Recommended Motion:
I. Adopt Resolutions; and
2. Authorize the Director of Finance to amend the FY 08-09 budget to transfer $250,000 from the Regional
Traffic Circulation Fee Fund (264) to CIP Project No. SS04-53 (Account No. 264-183-0000-7325).
~z-P
Contact Person: Robert Eisenbeisz City Engineer
Phone:
5203
Supporting data attached: Staff Report; Vicinity Map & Preliminary
Concept Plan, (2) Resolutions, Exhibits "A Ward:
& "B" (Agreements)
5&6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
$ 250,000
Source: (Acct. Nos)
264-183-000-7325
Acct. Description: Regional Traffic Circulation Fee Fund
Finance:
Council Notes: fit'J'.s 208-.-45/ l!t d}..<X)8-.B.s~
Agenda Item No.
-1b
1f'J.~()e
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
Subject:
Resolutions approving Project Baseline Agreement No. C09021 with SANBAG and Funding
Agreement with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for a Grade Separation at
Palm Avenue over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad (CIP Project No. SS04-53).
Background:
On April 10, 2008 the California Transportation Commission (CTC) earmarked $9,390,000 in
Trade Corridor Improvement Funds (TCIF) for the Palm Avenue Grade Separation over the BNSF
Railroad. SANBAG is currently working on the project and the estimated total cost is
$35,176,000, which is the total cost of the grade separation project. This grade separation project
will accommodate future widening of Palm Avenue and Cajon Boulevard from 2 lanes to 4 lanes
in the vicinity of the project.
SANBAG has approached the City to act as co-sponsor for the project in order to secure the
$9,390.000 in TCIF funding. Co-sponsoring the project will require the City to contribute a local
share of 14.6% percent of the total cost. If the City is unable to fund its share of the cost
SANBAG, at the discretion of its Board, may provide a loan of Measure I dollars to cover the local
share.
SANBAG is asking that two Agreements be approved by the City as follows:
1. Project Baseline Agreement No C09021 with various agencies including the CTC, Caltrans and
SANBAG. This Agreement commits the City to comply with the rules governing TCIF
funding.
2. Funding Agreement with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority. This
Agreement commits the City to fund 14.6% of the total project cost. This commitment is
necessary for SANBAG to obtain the TCIF funding.
The project is needed to reduce delays and congestion caused by high train volumes at the
crossing. Train traffic is expected to grow and this will cause additional delay and congestion.
The TCIF funding opportunity recently became available as a component of Proposition IB;
however, the funding requires timely delivery, and projects that are ready to proceed will be the
first in line for funding. Staff has been working with SANBAG to position this project to be one
of five others in the County to receive the first allocation of TCIF funding.
Financial Impact:
Staff is recommending that $250,000 be programmed for CIP Project No. SS04-53 in FY 08/09 to
fund San Bernardino's share of the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PAED). This
agreement commits the City to fund 14.6% percent of the total cost of the project, which is
currently estimated to be $35,176,000 for a cost to the City of approximately $5.14 million. This
amount will need to be programmed in the budgets for future fiscal years and is expected to come
from development fees. If future funding from development impact fees is not sufficiently
available, SANBAG may provide a loan of Measure I funding to cover the local share.
2 08/21/20083:35 PM
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT - Continued
Recommendation:
I. Adopt Resolutions; and
2. Authorize the Director of Finance to amend the FY 0809 budget to transfer $250,000 from the Regional
Traffic Circulation Fee Fund (264) to CIP Project No. 8804-53 (Account No. 264-183-0000-7325).
Attachments:
"1"- Vicinity Map
"2" - Preliminary Concept Plan
3
08/21/20083:35 PM
1m Ave .
Pa d Separation
Gra e
F.oNl:ANA
-
~ j
ONTARIO
-'
/
~---
/
. "- Ave
~P'!!...~e Separation
Gra _
'"
Glen Helen
Regional
Park
,./
t~
p
,/'
,
I
1 of 1
.' ~-: ~.' -. ...
ID ......,,~...
le ...~:~it,. "'f 4-.
, .
'. -. ~:t~""
.,
"\ -J'.
, ,
l ...,..;;' \.
.... . .".
.
~
'.
'.
~ .... ~~
,-~..... ~,
-...-
, .-
,illr.." \. ~ ::::.........
",..i:' . .
.....#""
-
...~
o
o
o
~
~
,
N
?
~
~
N
o
Z
~
<
-
.-
'.
o
o
o
~
~
,
N
?
w
ZW
~N
<0
.
.
~
,
a
;;; . ~..
.
w ~
" ,-
~ ,x
w
0
z
;: 0
0
~ w 0
z 0
~ ~
,
w ;;
a 0
~ ,
~ w
~ . w
~ N
0
%
~
<
---
~ -
... ~ ~
.. w
w
~
~ ,
,
w ,
.... " ,
~ , g
a;
~ ci
.
~~
~! ~
~
~
CCi~ ~ ! \
~~ g .
\
C'l~ " ,
;; ~~ ~
0
, 0
w w ).
W ~~~ "
N 0
0
% tJ u ~
~
< ~ "
~ ':l
]: li
~
,
\l.
~
~~
~g
JU .
~~ . .
~~ !'
""
.
0
~
.
.
"
z
o
"
~
>
~ S
_H-
.....J ~~
_~m
Im~
.-:~C')
:Eifjo~
I!''''ob
(f}<'N
N....""'
~~~
:J: ~~
Uo:\'!
NO:
N
>
~
%
~
o
u
a
w
0%
%0
~-
~
>u
~-
ao
W~
~-
oa
a~
~,
w
~ n g
LL at<) i
...J g; l'
~ I I !
o _ N
~ N
~
C
u
~
c
o
e
'"
.
~
c
=>
r
o
"
."
o
,..,
:~
~ ~
-i- ~
: !
z
""
0:
>-'
"'@j'
21
W
2
w
>
<l
'"
<i
ll.
o
N
"
0 0 0
;:: 0 '"
" .co
~ ..-c
o
"
co
o
co
'"
o
en
co
'"
"'.
o
'"
'"
N
,~'
~;-
:~
in
:~
'--'
0:
'~
o
<n
W
~
z
W
.>
<>:
::::ii
....J
<l
-0.
o
;::
o
'"
co
:~
:0:
'"
'"
:0
'co
'co
'>-'
" ~
" 0 :;
Z
jci ~
<lZ ~ ,
'" :
" ,
~ , g
II ci
"
I..
Q.
III
~
~~
Q
\j
~i ~ ;
g }.
~ ~
"
~I s
z ~
0 -
~ ~
8~ ~
> ...
u .oJ
. ~
'" ~
~ ~
0
0
N
~
~
o
'"
co
I
, , , , I
e~'l.69:~ i^iei3
. oa'a~+a. ld1
'\
\
\
\
I
~,
~\
;\
i-L
:0
."
.'"
:~
o
"
"
:~
~
.'"
.co,
;-O:(lJ
'..~>+-
__-'-_L--,-jQ~ __
IZU~
0-
-,'"
<;2:
'W'(/}
. ot'St;l1 ^i>j3chC-"-C~----~-C--C
Je'58+91 ld: '? J.9"H.9IMI:3,
00'05+91 :JA,3:
,
-T---
o
w
>
o
.
~
~
~
~
o
!
:
.,
: '
,
-j-
.1.
';---'0
,I,<c
't-,O
0:::'0::,
0' '
z'Z'
o
;Q)ipal-
,>:::>
<l>-,
:::!:;::
...J<n
<lz
."--
,
L..J._-'-
~
~
1,,'
I l:r:!
~~r:l;:
,~,.
0:0:3
IIJ')M.o,
'v'lIc'
:lIfrl"-'",
-:~r~~-
:
,
.'.-'.1
0:
~
'~9'<:dl~ ""13
0.0,0 51 ld
rdnif"-----
1;1 g';::i:
'W"<T'
o"'co
f 12~~:
.--,I-'-~~;--:-:--- ;
I 1Jli>,
e
.
o
01:
-,,:.....,
"
"
.
W'
Z
o
<l
~6
...IN
.... .
<M
"''''
co
.,~
r ......~
(,} I' I. I
,0, 'I' '
:~ ~
__~; , :1... _~~
:g~~: I :1
:o:gjr- I ..,~ I
:o:v:~'
I,N,IIa-., ," I ,
__ L_.J_...LllOto;;r__._---'-1-'-_L--"_-'__
--l,V'l, II
IV'l> ,I
0' .:~ 9~ Jl,8] 'I
00'01>+0 I :JA8
L
o
"
:g
"
,~
CD
'0
CD
CD
>
.
~
z
~
~
.
\J1;
,~
.,
.
.
>
...J ~ ~
...J I!!fi!
_Sl
-,,<
I~h
II:: w12~
JIl: ~~~
Nluuiri
:z:U
U~~
0'
-"....,
w
w '"
'" 0'"
. ~ o~
" ~ ro"
~ , ,
. 0 ~'1
0 u ~
.~ "
. "0
.~.~ ~ u
:J1:." ~
"
,...,... "
"'.. ':i:!':!o: e
'r,' '"
0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 '~. .
" ,.., N r:: 0 '" '" " co '" . , ~
... " ... " '" co '" cO '" "
~
...J
:h'
I I : . :.......
, ~ , lD
\' olD
'"
\ <!Q)
>+-
\ we::
\ 5u
,\ 0......
, I me::
\ :~~,
\ 9VJ;
j :~i
!c..>--'
$
>
<l
'"
...J
<l
""
,
,
,
\
I
,
,
,
g ','
LN
,
1
\
\
\
1:-
I
1
I
I
,
,
b
rc
,
-I-i-
- ---I"
~ iI'
"0 ;~ 'COla..
o O'-:::E'
'Ol"i
-- -- ~- rg:;i~; -
Iii '<;I;1I,co
~ ~j~1r
~>
o
'"
CD
'0
:,...;
CD
~-
N
N
o
q-
, W
NZ
~..
~
'"
, W
NZ
~..
~
"-
L ?c
.~ x ~
t -:O'~ T"-
O 0 -.J CD
<D~ "-
CP-'~ '"
+-l.O.,gf-
EN U ~
g ~.c=
o >>.",!:'o
UI-3:O:::
--
.
~a.
b ~ ~
0;-
<D ID
'" L
"- .
,"
u .~
"-'"
"-Z
....
u"-
>-'"
z"
W _
<D~
1-=-/1 I
t:> I J '- I
Z II I
~ I~ I-~----
:: . I ~ -=- ~ I
:;:: ~III I
~ III~ 1-----
B YI1-=-.:I I
~ II 1-_
W 1 \ 1
~ 11.=-;1 I
I- I r ~ -
~ ~ \ 1
III=~ 1._
= = =L--1--L!' _ .J
"
~
)
N-
O'l .~
,,;~
N-
~
..
oo
"-
o
--
'"
"-
'"
w~
"-
o
>-
'"
Z
~
::>
~
o
u
Z
..
"-
'"
~J 0
1- 1__
-~ I--~
_J I==~
...J 1
L _,= =::t
f- 1__
-, ,- - ~
=, ,= = ~
__...J 1
L _1= =::t
1-""_ _
=' ,- - ~
-.! ,= = ~
_...J 1__
L _1- -::t
"-
I
;"
"-
'" "''''
1>-
N ..-
L 0
0 W<D f
> >- -- "-oo
>-=> ~
N >-u N
co
CO '6
'"
0 CO N "-
~- - L >- L ~Z--"
- 0 0 L ..>-
> 0 >- 0 0---"
;" > -
> >-" - - - -
'" N WOO
,,; '6 ~O
'"
'"
CO
N
L >-
0 0 Z
> >- -- W
~ ~~
N W
>
..
"-
U
..
;"
o
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
'"
1 0
Y
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
w
::::)
Z
W
>
ce
:E
....I
ce
A.
I
Zw
--"
OJ
_ '"
I- 0
>-
<J>-
wg
o
W
CJ
C
-
a:
a:I
....I
ce
<J
-
A.
>-
I-
'" ~
0 ~
Z 8 ~
id I
..Z " ~
oo i ~
" ~
I I ~
~ I .;
~I . .
ci ~
.
~I ).
~
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
....
~e g \I.
w it
~I "
>
.
0
6~ w
~
0
>
"
"
~ ~
~
0
0
N
J
~
~~
~g ~
0 ""
w ~8 ..
> . c
0 c. >
~ "'~ '" c i
~ c. z W
~ z:t; !:' c
4 mi;<! 13 w c
"
.
c
.
"
"
.
~
~
o
~
.
s
.
. z
. z
s ~
...J ~-
...J ",S
_"lll
=>,s
I~~~
::E ~~~
N~:g:ii
::c iK1
U~~
Zc
~a:
I-
<JZ
wO
0-
I-
>-::::)
ce!::
~I-'j
C0j
_Z~
-->-
0'->-
a:Wg
>
....Ice
ce
<J:E
-....I
A.ce
~A.
W
w n
oo
0 "- on
" o~
~ roV
0 ~ 1 I
0 C2 _N
., N
" v
In "0
u
~
c
0
e
~
"
~
c
::>
11= '1 I
<:> , c
~ II 1-....._______
~ 1 ~ r I
C) II = \oJ I
: ~\: (\ ~ -- - - - - - - -
U , II::: r I
~ I ( ,j I
t:Q I~ ~_________
Ii! ',= J '
2 I t I
'" e ,---------
"- ,\ r i
111 = J
~~=L--'d)
,,0-,9
'"
~ ~",-" l:l
"'~~
ct:Cl-.JLu ,,~
~~<:~ ' ' vi'
",11: ~
~~\-. :51- Q..
'" " ::;j
t--.:l.O::tl.) "'~ " 8
lut\l(.,):<:: '" "
'" ~ "''''
~~~;::!~ ~Ol \-.
8t~~1- ,,!!; ~
"-<:>
Ol
~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
>- '" '"
~ ~ ~ ~~
cc I- ~ ~~
~ c.., Q -", "",
~ ~ ii! 1s~ 1s~
'" '" ~ \;,:~ \;,:~
~ 8 it::J it~
0: 0: Ii! (j (j
ctl ~ i2 i;]">! i;]">!
\;,: \;,: (j 15!< 15!<
"" "" /ill;; ~~ ~~
~ a..: 0.. Q;::.. Q:::=,.
~
~ 8ee~ EB
c,
"
Ol
..
c,
"
~
?~
, "
~..,
~
"
"
..,
~
""- -
c,,,,
b ,I <:
,I C\J "'t
'" -..,
c(
~,
~,
::t:Q:1
9L,)
OlC (jl;;'
C'" ~51
c' Ol""
"'c ~ , ~8
+~ ,
~- \)
'"
'" ,,' ..
15 ,,~ \-.
.. "'''' , J-.' '" Ol
'" C
I u:, " +
'"
'"
G 310N 335
111:! 1113~
NIff "J t -,~Z
c,
"
c
'"
-r -,
-L Ji
.,
\-.
~
c,
"
~
.,
X:!~1I1
311mnl
117:! 1111A
NIff ,,9-/~
c
c
+
<0
'"
I 110N 115,
117:! 1111A
NIIf "Ot-,~
~
c
,
c,
.,
Lu -
~
'" ~
'" "<( c,
'" 0::", ,I
(j"- l'..:l.., c
", " ..
o~ Lu~ ., '"
C<o ~~ "
Co ~
"', l1.. ..
~c
, a
0::
~ 0..
'"
, ~
, .......
1--'
, c
, ~Jt
, Lu-
, -.I
, c Lu
~'"
-r -, ..\-.
-L Ji "'"
~
111:! 1111~
Nlff "f-,8
~
~
<:> '
"-
"
<:>
0
,
, c
c
, +
.,
, '"
,
,
,
, ~
-,
5' c ..,
"" c '"
", .,; ~
'"
, '" '"
, " i2
, '"
, ..,
'"
, 3
, "
, "
Ol
c,
"
o
.,
'"
0", '"
0..
'" o a;)
.. "0
+~
.,; c_
'"
,,'
,,~
"''''
..,
~
~
~
"-
i2
~
~..:
y~ ,,"-
// ~~
"'"
~EJ
Ol..,
~~~
"gs....
_l,
- -, J
, ^
--""L_-"
" ~
"' 0 ~
Z w
3:0 "
~
<tZ " ,
'" w ,
" w ,
" ,
~ ,
~ ~I
~I Vl
Vl
3 <0
0-< Z
~~ a:: 0 <C
"'a:: ...J
>- >---' a..
~~ 0-
~ <
~ ",a:: ...J
~~ :;) <C
Zu. c:
- ",Vl W
~ ~~ >z Z
... <lD W
..s ~~ 21- <:l
~ ---,<
Si <
cr. 0-
Ue;;
~J
!Q !Q
~ ~G
~~
I ~~
",,8
"'0:
~ ",'"
~li!
'"
! tjs
~"-
~!;,
~~
(j"
~~ ~~
h ~~
"", ,,"-
~'" '"
~I :~ ~~
oj
;
~
0
~
~
w
"
.
0
~
.
>
.
- - 1- - -,
, ~
- - ~ --"
<:
a
i::
<..l
Lu,
\1)0
Ii
-.I':...
~
.......
~
I--
~
..,
'"
"-"
o
~
~ ~..
~
o
o
N
__-r-,
, I
^
_ J_ _ ~
~
Vi
~
"-
i2
5311J11~
~
..,
'"
~
~
"
w
>
"
~
~
~
~
-...-,
, I
^
- J_ _ JI
;61 S3IW~
,g
--y:r-
~j
o
o
.;'"
0",
+ ,
<D"
"'-
~
,,-
"'
",,,
'"
~Gj
~
o
"
;;
w
.
~
"-
~
~
'"
"- '5
~ ~
~ ~
\-.
'"
8
M/II 1111 ~5NfJ
<
.
.
,
_~ ,..-F:.,,_,..-F:. _ _
.~~. ..
S>'" C>
~Si 0
+
<0 ~
'"
,+, ~
~ "
<0 ~
'"
..,
," ~ ~
<0 ""
'"
,"
<0
...J ~-
...J w ~
_1::<
I~~~
:E ~~~
~~~
1-0...:-
N~~~
:J: ~o;
""
CJiil~
~Ci:
-tp",
~"
<:,
"<(~
-.J -'1
0..;'"
M/IJ 1111 l5NfJ
c
c
+
~~-..-A
!\J~.J..-~\.
~
'"
~
'"
~.._._-
.-..-.. n_n_.._.._.._
0
0
+
-..-..-..-..-
'"
~1 ~
..,
'"
~
w
'" W 1'0
2 "to ~ on
0 "- ,,~
'" ~ "'....
~ , ,
!:"'\ 0 0 ~::::
u >-
--y:r- .~ ....
~ 0 '0
'" U
."
~ ~ Vi ~i c
0
~ e
,r e'
0
"- ."
;61 ;61 ,g i2 c
=>
.of
_U_ _ _U_U(U_"_u
~~
"'''
, "
c'"
~~
'"
~"
~t5
h:'"
..,~
"'~
~
c
c
.;'"
"'''
+ .
"'''' '"
"'- "-
~ c
,,- ..,
"' '"
"'"
"'''-
"'.., 0
COL.u 0.. i
2
~.,
.z:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 III
13 11/
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
CC(Q)~)f
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING FUNDING
AGREEMENT FOR PALM AVENUEIBNSF GRADE SEPARATION WITH THE SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of
the City the Funding Agreement between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
and the City of San Bernardino for Rail-Highway Grade Separation Project at Palm Ave BNSF,
attached and incorporated herein as Attachment "I."
SECTION 2. The authorization to execute the above-referenced Agreement is rescinded
if it is not executed within sixty (60) days of the passage of this resolution.
- I -
RESOLUTION ... APPROVING FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR PALM
1 AVENUEIBNSF GRADE SEPARATION WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Ch 2 TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.
3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
4 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held
5 on the day of , 2008, by the following vote, to wit:
6 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
7 ESTRADA
8
.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.
BAXTER
BRINKER
DERRY
KELLEY
JOHNSON
MC CAMMACK
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day of , 2008.
Approved as to form:
Patrick J. Morris, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
By:
- 2 -
~!O\
'11:/
.
.
Attachment "1"
FUNDING AGREEMENT NO.
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FOR
Rail-Highway Grade Separation Projeet at Palm Ave BNSF
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of by
and between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred to
as "SANBAG") and City of San Bernardino (hereinafter referred to as "CITY").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, on April 10, 2008 the California Transportation Commission (CTe)
approved $9,390,000 in Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (TCIF) for this project; and
WHEREAS, the estimated total cost of the Palm Ave. Railroad Grade Separation Project
(hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT")is $35,176,000, which includes construction
of a grade separation (highway over rail) and widening of Palm Ave and Cajon Blvd
from 2 to 4 lanes; and
WHEREAS, SANBAG and the CITY are the co-sponsors of the project; and
WHEREAS, in order to secure the $9,390,000 in TCIF funding, the sponsoring agencies
will need to identify all project funding as being committed and available; and
WHEREAS, if the CITY and SANBAG cannot provide the identified share of the project
cost at the time of project construction, the TCIF funds will be lost;
NOW, THEREFORE, SANBAG and the CITY agree to the following:
I. Local share is defined as the development contribution portion of the PROJECT cost
established in the SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study. This portion is
established as 14.6% Percent for all phases of the PROJECT and is estimated in the
PROJECT Programming Request form (Attachment A) which maybe be updated from
time to time to reflect current conditions
2. TCIF funds are considered as part of the public share funding and the local share is not
reduced by the TCIF contribution.
Page I
Ilk;
.f'
.
.
3. The CITY agrees to commit a minimum of 14.6% Percent of the total PROJECT cost
as its share of the funding of the PROJECT. The CITY agrees that this funding will come
from development contributions but that the CITY may borrow from other accounts to
provide this funding, if provision is made to reimburse such accounts with development
contribution as they become available.
4. If at the time the funds are required the CITY is not able to provide the required 14.6%
Percent local share of the PROJECT cost as estimated on the most current Project
Programming Request form (Attachment A), SANBAG may provide a loan of Measure I
dollars to cover the CITY local share at the discretion of the SANBAG Board.
Repayment of such a loan by development contributions would occur in accordance with
the provision of a loan agreement between SANBAG and the CITY. Loan agreement will
be established through the strategic plan process, which will result in specific policies and
procedures governing these loans.
5. No commitment to loan Measure I funds for the PROJECT can be made until the
SANBAG Board has approved a loan agreement containing the specific terms and
conditions for the PROJECT.
San Bernardino County
Transportation Autboritv
Citv of San Bernardino
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
PROCEDURE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
By:
Jean-Rene Basle
SANBAG County Counsel
James F. Penman
City Attorney
Date:
Date:
Page 2
,.
~--
2008 Project Programming Request
(Project Information)
Attachment "A"
.
[2] New Project o Amendment (Existing Project) I Dale: 07/10/08
Caltrln. DlltrIcl .. . II:A PPNO MPOID TCRP No.
08 200850 N/A
County R~cln1dor PrO ec:t AMnlorILead Aileney ~ Element
SBD SAN BAG SCAG MT
Prolect TItII . '.
Palm Ave Railroad Grade Separation
PM Bk ~ ProJICI ontIct one I:-mall Add.....
Gilbert Betancourt 909-886-3971 gbetancourt@sanbag.ca.gov
LOCItIOn~ect Limns. on 0"" ork. atlve Delerl on:, .
In the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bemardino, from 1000' east of at-grade on Palm Ave and
1000' north and south of grade on Cajon Blvd, construct grade separation (likely highway over rail) and widen
Palm and Cajon from 2 to 4 lanes
. ComDOnent < ... . ImDleme na Aaen""- I.ItI8r Of I o P,.ludlce
PA&ED SANBAG
PS&E SAN BAG
Riaht of Wav SANBAG
construetiW:NBAG : ..... .' ....., ..,
IlIlYe.j',' .>. ."..' . ..' . . '.
AssemblY: 63 I Senate: 132
conare88~ .
Puraoeean I. . . . '. . ... .
Palm Ave is a major east-west arterial that carries approximately 5,300 vehicles per day. The estimated 94
freight and two passenger trains that cross Palm Ave every day create substantial traffic delays and disrupt
access to a developing industriallwarehouse area nearby. Separating the railroad crossing from Palm Ave will
mitigate community impacts of goods movement and provide more reliable access to warehouse and truck
facilities.
PrGlect n ..:.', . ';.' ":,,c".:- i.',:. .' ::.... '.<..y ,.' .,. , :; ..
Railroad grade separations increase travel reliability on major roadways for both the community and truck
traffic, improve air quality, and eliminate potential conflicts between vehicular and train traffic, which all act to
mitigate the impact of freight movement on communities. This grade separation will eliminate gate down time
of 6.6 hours per day in 2030 and is estimated to reduce 105 daily vehicle hours of delay in 2030.
~..ton."',',,',,'.. . ..-.c . .' '. --aile
PrOlect Study Report Approved N1A
Beain Environmental (PA&EDl Phase IDocumentJi2!:i N/A 07/01/08
Circulate Draft Environmental Document CEOA SE
Draft Proiect Reoort 06/30/09
End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone) 12/30/09
Beain Desian (PS&E) Phase 01/01110
End Desion Phase (Readv to List for Advertisement Milestone) 06130/12
Beain Riaht of Way Phase 07/01/10
End Richt of Way Phase (Richt of Way Certification Milestone) 06/30/12
Beain Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone) 07/01/12
End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceotance Milestone) 12/30/13
Beain Closeout Phase 01/01114
End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report) 06/30/14
General Instructions
.
.
FOI1lJ Version Date: 1011/07
.
.
.
IMww
2008 Project Programming Request
(Funding Information)
(dollars in thousands and escalated to the programmed year)
,V,
"::/'1
i.'"
County i CT_ . PPNO . TCflP_ No. . IA
SaD I 08 I 0 I N/A I 0
project 'I1tIe: IPalm Ave Railroad Grado Separation
Dete: 07/10/08
Exl.llng TaIIl Projoct Coot
Component Prior 08109 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13114+ Total ImP/.menUng Ag.ncy
E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0
PS&E ..... . ---~_..- ---- -
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- . __n_.. -- - .. u
R/WSUPJCTj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~--- -------. ---------
CQ.N ~~P JCT) 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0
----.------. . -- ------- ....-
RIW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
----.._~-- .-----
CON 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0
Propoud TaIIl Project Coot
~&P (PA&ED) '. 7eo . 0 0 0 0 0 0 7eo
PS&E 0 . 0 2.000 0 0 0 0 .c:. 2.000
RIW SUP ICT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0
CON SUP ICT) .'. 0 . o ..... ..0 0 0 . 0 0 ,:,. 0
RIW '. 0 . '0 ""'1.1. .... <0 . 0 0 .' 0 '.' (,121
CON '. 0 0 0' 0 31.300 0 0 '.1.3110
TOTAL 7GO 0 3.121 0 31.300 o . 0 1IG.17\1
Fund No. 1: I Program Code
Exlollng Fund"'"
Component Prior 08109 09110 10/11 11/12 12/13 13114+ Total FundIntI Agency
E&P IPA&ED) '. 0 . 0 0 0 0 . .'. t
PS&E . 0 0 0 . . . . tI' . .
RIW SUP (CT) " c.. " C .,. ,. '" ..' ..' . '. " . .. .'. , . " .. .."'" .
CON SUP ICT) 'i.f' ..".......0 L. '.;;" . '-0 . .. :" . . .
RIW /, . .'. . .. 0 , . .. "', .: " .
CON .. .. ..' C 0 0 . 'o' . o' ' .
TOTAL 0 .... .' 0 .' .. . . . .'.,' . . .... .
PI'OpOHd Funding -
E&P IPA&ED) o Proposed TCIF
PS&E .c;, 0
RIW SUP (CT) '.': 0
CON SUP ICT) .'. . I
RIW I
CON S.390 UIO
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 .,- 0 0 '.3llO
F_ No. Z: 1 Progmn C_
-", FundIntI
Component Prior 08109 09110 10111 11/12 12/13 13/14+ Total FuncItng Agency
E&P (PA&ED) 0 L . .' . 0 0 I ..... .
PS&E . .... . " . '.'0 . ' . . ....' 0 -, ...
---------
R1Y" SUi'JCT) . ..' . .~.' , . 0 .. . .... . . .. .
CON SUP (CT) . . . . . 0 . .
RIW . . . 0 . . . .
CON . . 0 . 0 . . .
TOTAL . . . 0 . . 0 .
Propoold Funding Not..
E&P (PA&ED) ... . ----- o Developer Impact Fees
PS&E . .
.
RIW SUP eCT) 0
CON SUP eCT) 0
RfW 0
CON 5.136 $,130
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 8,1:18 0 0 0,1:18
Form Version Dele: 1011107
1012
.
.
..
.....
2008 Project Programming Request
(Funding Information)
(dollars in thousands and escalated to the programmed year)
Date: 07/10/08
#J'I
.~,
County I CTD_ I PPNO I TCRP ~No. I I!A
SSD ~ 08 I 0 I N/A I 0
Project 11tIe: IPalm Ave Railroad Grade Separation
Fund No, 3: I Program Code
EJdolJng Funding
Component Prior 08109 09110 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14+ Total Funding Agency
~P (P",&ED) . . . . . . . I
PS&E . . . 0 . . . .
--_. -.--
RIW SUP (Cl) . . . . . . . .
'C~N~SUF' (Cl) . . . . .. . . . .
RIW . . . . .. . . . .
-------
CON . . . . . . . .
TOTAL . . . 0 . . . .
Proposed Funding Not..
E&P (PA&ED) 750 7SO San Bernardino County
PS&E 1--- 2,000 2,000 Measure I
RIW SUP (CT) 0
CON SUP (Cl) .
RIW 1,126 1,121
CON 18,774 1.,774
TOTAL . 7SO .. 0 1.121 .. 0 .774 0 0 20,_
Fund No. 4: I Progl'llm Cod.
ExIaIIng Funding
Component Prior 08109 09110 10111 11/12 12/13 13114+ TOIaI Funding Aoonc:Y
E&P (PA&ED) . , . . .'. 0 0 . . 0 I
PS&E .' "" ,.,' . >> '"~I " . ",; .. . . ., .',. .
RIW SUP (Cl) " . . , . : '. ' .. , . ,,:' . . : I
CON SUP (Cl) . . .. , .. " . .. ,.' '. 0 .
RIW . . " . . '. .. ,f-: '. . " 0
CON . . - 0 '. . -'-' '. - 0 0 I
TOTAL . 0 . o . 0 . 0 0 .
Propoeed Funding N.....
E&P (PA&ED) " , .
PS&E 0
RIW SUP (Cl) ". .0
CON SUP (Cl) 0
RIW ". .
CON . . .
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fund No, I: I Program C_
Exlotlng Funding
Component Prior 0810. 09110 10111 11/12 12/13 13/14+ TOIaI Funding Aoonc:Y
E&F>JP,A&ED) , . . 0 . c, 0 0 ,
PS&E . 0 ',' . ".' . .' . . . 0
--- -- ---_.._--
RIW SUP (Cl) 0 . . . . . . 0
---- --
CON SUP (Cl) 0 . . . . . . . . .
RJW . . . . 0 . 0 0
CON . 0 . 0 0 0 . 0
TOTAL . . . 0 0 . . 0
Propoaed Funding N.....
E&P (PA&ED) -- . .
.. , -
PS&E 0
RJW SUP (Cl) .
CON SUP (Cl) . ,
RJW 0
CON 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Form Version Dele: lIY1107
2012
c
c
o
t(O)~V
RESOLUTION NO.
1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING FUNDING
2 AGREEMENT FOR PALM AVENUEIBNSF GRADE SEPARATION WITH THE SAN
3 BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.
4
5
6
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of
the City the Funding Agreement between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
7
8
and the City of San Bernardino for Rail-Highway Grade Separation Project at Palm Ave BNSF,
9 attached and incorporated herein as Attachment" I."
10
11
12 /II
13 //I
SECTION 2. The authorization to execute the above-referenced Agreement is rescinded
ifit is not executed within sixty (60) days of the. passage of this resolution.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/~
~,J -r? j>
c
c
o
-
.
RESOLUTION ::. APPROVING FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR PALM
1 AVENUEIBNSF GRADE SEPARATION WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
2 TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
4 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held
5 on the day of , 2008, by the following vote, to wit:
6 Council Members:
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ABSTAIN ABSENT
NAYS
AYES
ESTRADA
BAXTER
BRINKER
DERRY
KELLEY
JOHNSON
14 MC CAMMACK
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day of , 2008.
Patrick J. Morris, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to form:
JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
-2-
Attachment" 1 "
c
FUNDING AGREEMENT NO.
BETWEEN
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FOR
Rail-Highway Grade Separation Project at Palm Ave BNSF
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of by
and between the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred to
as "SANBAG") and City of San Bernardino (hereinafter referred to as "CITY").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, on April 10, 2008 the California Transportation Commission (CTC)
approved $9,390,000 in Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (TCIF) for this project; and
c
WHEREAS, the estimated total cost of the Palm Ave. Railroad Grade Separation Project
(hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT")is $35,176,000, which includes construction
of a grade separation (highway over rail) and widening of Palm Ave and Cajon Blvd
from 2 to 4 lanes; and
WHEREAS, SANBAG and the CITY are the co-sponsors of the project; and
WHEREAS, in order to secure the $9,390,000 in TCIF funding, the sponsoring agencies
will need to identify all project funding as being committed and available; and
WHEREAS, if the CITY and SANBAG cannot provide the identified share of the project
cost at the time of project construction, the TCIF funds will be lost;
NOW, THEREFORE, SANBAG and the CITY agree to the following:
I. Local share is defined as the development contribution portion of the PROJECT cost
established in the SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study. This portion is
established as 14.6% Percent for all phases of the PROJECT and is estimated in the
PROJECT Progranuning Request form (Attachment A) which maybe be updated from
time to time to reflect current conditions
o
2. TCIF funds are considered as part of the public share funding and the local share is not
reduced by the TCIF contribution.
Page I
c
3. The CITY agrees to commit a minimum of 14.6% Percent of the total PROJECT cost
as its share of the funding of the PROJECT. The CITY agrees that this funding will come
from development contributions but that the CITY may borrow from other accounts to
provide this funding, if provision is made to reimburse such accounts with development
contribution as they become available.
4. If at the time the funds are required the CITY is not able to provide the required 14.6%
Percent local share of the PROJECT cost as estimated on the most current Project
Programming Request form (Attachment A), SANBAG may provide a loan of Measure I
dollars to cover the CITY local share at the discretion of the SANBAG Board.
Repayment of such a loan by development contributions would occur in accordance with
the provision of a loan agreement between SANBAG and the CITY. Loan agreement will
be established through the strategic plan process, which will result in specific policies and
procedures governing these loans.
5. No commitment to loan Measure I funds for the PROJECT can be made until the
SANBAG Board has approved a loan agreement containing the specific terms and
conditions for the PROJECT.
San Bernardino County
Transportation Authoritv
City of San Bernardino
c
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
PROCEDURE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Jean-Rene Basle
SANBAG County Counsel
Date:
Date: ~ Z ~ ~oo I'
o
Page 2
c
c
o
.,
~-
2008 Project Programming Request
(Project Information)
Attachment "A"
Genera/lnslructions
o New Project o Amendment (Existing Project) I '""Date: I 07/10/08
Caltrana District EA PPNO MPOID TCRPNo.
08 200850 N/A
County Route/Corrldor Pro ect SDOn8or/Lead Agency MPO EI81118nt
SBD SANBAG SCAG MT
I"roJectTltle . .
Palm Ave Railroad Grade Separation
PMBk PM Ahd Prolect Mar/Contact Phone E"",all Add"'a
Gilbert Betancourt 909-886-3971 9betancourt@sanbag.ca.gov
Location. ProJect Limite. DeacrlDtlon. Scope of Work. Leolalatlva Deacrlotlon .
In the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino. from 1000' east of at-grade on Palm Ave and
1000' north and south of grade on Cajon Blvd, construct grade separation (likely highway over rail) and widen
Palm and Cajon from 2 to 4 lanes
ComDOnent ImDlementlng Agency AB 3090 Lettar of No Pl'8ludlCe
PA&ED SAN BAG
PS&E SAN BAG
Riaht of Way SANBAG
conatructio=NBAG , .. . ,.;". '~>+ ' ".:":
L8lIlal8tlve D . .
Asaembly: 63 I Senate:132
Congreaalonal: 143
Plirooaa andNMd .- ". . .', . :.,"," ,.~.... .C
Palm Ave is a major east-west arterial that carries approximately 5.300 vehicles per day. The estimated 94
freight and two passenger trains that cross Palm Ave every day create substantial traffic delays and disrupt
access to a developing industriallwarehouse area nearby. Separating the railroad crossing from Palm Ave will
mitigate community impacts of goods movement and provide more reliable access to warehouse and truck
facilities.
ProJect Benlflta "~- .. ."" . ..5:- '.'"
Railroad grade separations increase travel reliability on major roadways for both the community and truck
traffic, improve air quality, and eliminate potential conflicts between vehicular and train traffic, which all act to
mitigate the impact of freight movement on communities. This grade separation will eliminate gate down time
of 6.6 hours per day in 2030 and is estimated to reduce 105 daily vehicle hours of delay in 2030.
I"l'olectMI!m9)lj. . "'''; .... " ....'. " . - """> '.0801\..
Proiect Study Report Approved N1A
Beoin Environmental IPA&EDl Phase 07/01/08
Circulate Draft Environmental Document IDOCUlh8l1t!ii!!:) N/A CEQA SE
Draft Proiect Report 06130/09
End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone) 12/30/09
Begin Design (PS&E) Phase 01101/10
End Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone) 06130/12
Beain Riaht of Wav Phase 07/01/10
End Right of Way Phase (Riaht of Way Certification Milestone) 06130/12
Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone) 07/01/12
End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone) 12/30113
Begin Closeout Phase 01/01/14
End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report) 06/30/14
Form Version Date: 10/1/07
c
o
o
.
.....
2008 Project Programming Request
(Funding Information)
(dollars in thousands and escatated to the programmed year)
Dolo' 07/10108
county I CT Dtotrtct PPNO I TCRP p........ No. I EA
SBD I 08 I 0 I N1A I 0
ProIect TItle: IPalm Ave Railroad Grade Separation
Existing Total Project Coot
Component Prior 08108 09110 10111 11/12 12/13 13/14+ Total ImDlementlna Auencv
~~~. (PA&ED) . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.- ~ .-
~S~. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- ~ -
~ SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-. ~
CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
.,..,.. . ..-- _._._~
fWJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ . .-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Proposed Total Project Cost
ESP (PASED) 750 0 0 0 0 0 0 715O
P$&E" 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000
~SUP (CT) 0 0 0 " 0 0 0" . o' 0
CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0
.,.,--- 0 1,128 0 0 0 0 .' 1,128
fWJ 0
CON O. 0 0 0 31,300 0 . 0 o 31,300
TOTAL 715O 0 3,128 I 0 31,300 0 0 35,178
Fund No.1: I Program COde
ExIolIng Funding
Component Prior 08108 08/10 10111 11/12 12/13 13114+ Total Funding Agency
ESP (PASED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0
PSSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0
fWJ SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 . 0' . 0
CON SU~ (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. " 0
~ 0 0 0 0 .0 0 o . 0
CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0
TOTAL . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Proposed Funding N_
ESP (PA&ED) .' "0 Proposed TCIF
~- -~-- -. .0
-
fWJ SUP (CT) .- ---. 0
CON SUP (CT) 0
... -- --
fWJ 0
CON 8,380 B,380
TOTAL ,0 ., 0 0 0 B._ 0 0 .., B._
Fund No.2: I Program Code
ExIetIng Fundlng
Component Prior 08108 08110 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14+ Total Funding Agency
ESP (PASED) 0 0 0 0 . 0 . . 0 0
PSSE . 0 . , 0 0 " 0 . 0
fWJ SUP (CT) . '0 : ..' . . . o .... . 0 0 . 0
CON SUP (CT) ... o . . Ii . . 0 ,u. . ". 0 ". 0
fWJ 0 0 . - 0 . Ii . . 0
CON 0 0 . 0 . . 0 0 0
TOTAL 0" .. '.0 . 0 ", 0 . 0
Propaoed Funding Notaa
ESP (PA&ED) .:.:-.0 Developer Impact Fees
-
PSSE 0
. ---- c/'';'
fWJ SUP (CT) ... 0
..- .
CON SUP (CT) '0
. -- -
fWJ '0
- .....
CON 5,138 . '0. J;1.
TOTAL o. 0 o .' 0 .. 8.1M . 0 '0 'c,6,ll1ll
Form Version Date: 1011/07
10f2
c
o
o
.
llIt'IIN'
2008 Project Programming Request
(Funding Information)
(dollars in thousands and escalated to the programmed year)
DMe: 07/10108
County I CTOlttrtct I PPNO I TCRP ProIoct No. EA
SeD I De I 0 I N/A I 0
Proltct TItle: I Palm Ave Railroad Grade Separation
Fund No.3: I Program Code
e.ltUng Funding
Component Prior 08109 09/10 10111 11/12 12/13 13114+ Total Funding Agency
E&P (PA&EO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-c-_~ 0 0 0
PS&E 0 0 0 0 0
~~UP (eT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~. 0 0 0 0 0 0
RfW 0 0
CoN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pl'Opooed Funding -
~PA&EO.L 750 750 San Bernardino County
~-- -~ .- - Measure I
~- 2,000 2,000
--- -- f-------
~~UP (CT) 0
.--- f-------. ---- 1------
COt.! SUP (C2) ..- _. 0
- - I--- - - .
~-- --- f-- - 1.126 1,128
CON 16.774 10,774
TOTAL 750 0 3,128 0 18.774 0 0 20,850
Fund No.4: I Program Cod.
ExltUng Funding
Component Prior 08109 09110 10111 11/12 12/13 13114+ Total Funding Agonc:y
E&P (PA&EO) 0 0 0 0 0, i. .0 O. 0
~- 0 0 0 0 ... '" ;.-, 0 0 0
RfW SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0" .. 0 . . 0
CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0
RfW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CoN~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pl'OJlOOod Funding -
E&P (PMED) 0
PS&E 0
-- n__
RfW SUP (CT) 0
---.-
CON SUP (CT) 0
.
RfW -- f-- 0
CON . 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 o. 0 0 0
Fund No.5: I Program Code
ExltUng Funding
Component Prior 08109 09/10 10111 11112 12113 13114+ Total Funding ~y
E&P (PA&EO) 0 0 0 '. . 0 '. 0 0
PS&E 0 0 . -"~ - , " O. .- . .. . 0
RfW SUP (CT) . . . I;;" . o ",c.,' . " .
CON SUP (CT) 0 . 0.. 0 O' 0 0 0
RfW . 0 . . 0 . 0 0
CON 0 0 . . . " o .... 0
TOTAL . . . . . . 0 0
Pl'Opooed Funding Notn
E&P (PA&ED) 0
PS&E '0
RfW SUP (CT) . '0
_.---
CON SUP (CT) 0
RfW .;.. "0
CON - f--~
0
TOTAL 0 0 .... .01, 0 .0 ;" 0 0 ';0
Fonn VersIOn Date. 1011107
2of2
c
c
",.
t
t~[PV
RESOLUTION NO.
1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING PROJECT
ASELlNE AGREEMENT FOR PALM AVENUEIBNSF GRADE SEPARATION WITH
3 THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (CTC), THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CAL TRANS) AND THE SAN BERNARDINO
4 ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG).
5
2
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
6
7
8 the 'City, the Project Baseline Agreement, SANBAG Agreement No. C0902I Trade Corridors
9
10
11
12
13
SECTION I. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of
Improvement Fund, between the California Transportation Commission, the California
Department of Transportation, San Bernardino Associated Governments, and the City of San
Bernardino, attached and incorporated herein as Attachment "1."
SECTION 2. The authorization to execute the above-referenced Agreement is rescinded
if it is not executed within sixty (60) days of the passage of this resolution.
14
III
15
16 11/
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
0 26
27
28
- 1 -
c
o
o
RESOLUTION ... APPROVING PROJECT BASELINE AGREEMENT FOR
1 PALM AVENUEIBNSF GRADE SEPARATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA
2 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (CTC), THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) AND THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED
3 GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG).
4
5
6
7
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held
on the
day of
, 2008, by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members:
AYES
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
8
ESTRADA
9
10
11 BRINKER
12
13
14
15
BAXTER
DERRY
KELLEY
JOHNSON
MC CAMMACK
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 Approved as to form:
23
24
25
26
27
28
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day of , 2008.
Patrick J. Morris, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
~
-2-
c
1.
1.1
2.
2.1
o
Attachment "1"
SAN BAG Agreement No. C09021
TRADE CORRIDORS IMPROVEMENT FUND
PROJECT BASELINE AGREEMENT
PARTIES AND DATE
This Project Baseline Agreement (Agreement) for the Palm Ave Grade
Seoaration. effective on September 1, 2008, is made by and between the
California Transportation Commission (Commission), the California Department
of Transportation (Caltrans), and the San Bernardino Associated Governments
(SANBAG) and the City of San Bernardino(Project Sponsors), sometimes
collectively referred to as the "Parties".
RECITAL
Whereas at its April 10, 2008 Meeting the California Transportation Commission
programmed the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund and included in this program
of projects the Palm Ave Grade Seoaration, the parties are entering into this
Project Baseline Agreement to document the project cost, schedule, scope and
benefits, as detailed on the Project Programming Request Form attached hereto as
Exhibit A, the Draft Proiect Studv Reoort or Eouivalent attached hereto as Exhibit
B, and the Project Benefits Form attached hereto as Exhibit C, as the baseline for
project monitoring by the California Transportation Commission and its Project
Delivery Council. The undersigned Project Sponsor certifies that the funding
sources cited are committed and expected to be available; the estimated costs
represent full project funding; and the scope and description of benefits is the best
estimate possible.
3. GENERAL PROVISIONS
The Project Sponsor and Caltrans agree to abide by the following provisions:
3.1 To meet the requirements of Government Code Section 8879.23(c)(I), as added
by Proposition IB, and of Government Code Section 8879.50, as enacted through
implementing legislation in 2007 (Senate Bill 88 and Assembly Bill 193).
3.2 To adhere to the provisions of the California Transportation Commission
Resolution TCIP-P-0708-01, "Adoption of Program of Projects for the Trade
Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF)," dated April I 0, 2008.
3.3 To adhere to the California Transportation Commission's Trade Corridors
Improvement Fund Guidelines.
3.4 To adhere to the California Transportation Commission's Accountability
Implementation Plan and Policies, and program and baseline amendment
processes.
3.5 The Sponsoring Agency agrees to secure funds for any additional costs of the
project. Any change to the funding commitments outline in this agreement
requires an amendment.
o
Page lof3
C09023
o
3.6 To report to the California Transportation Commission on a quarterly basis on the
progress made toward the implementation of the project, including scope, cost
and schedule.
3.7 To report to the California Transportation Commission on the progress, on a
quarterly basis, and outcomes, at the end of the environmental phase, of the
environmental process with regard to air quality impacts due to emissions from
diesel or other particulates and related mitigation strategies. Whereas the Bond
Act mandates that the Commission shall allocate TCIF for trade infrastructure
improvements in a manner that places emphasis on projects that improve trade
corridor mobility while reducing emissions of diesel particulate and other
pollutant emissions, the Department of Transportation, the Sponsoring Agency,
and the Corridor Coalition understand and agree that the California Transportation
Commission will only allocate TCIF to projects that can demonstrate compliance
with applicable environmental requirements. If environmental clearance is
conditioned to the implementation of mitigation measures, the sponsoring agency
must commit, in writing, to the implementation of those mitigation measures.
3.8 To maintain and make available to the California Transportation Commission
and/or its designated representative, all work related documents, including
engineering and financial data, during the course of the project and retain. those
records for four years from the date of the final closeout of the project. Financial
records will be maintained in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
3.9 The California Transportation Commission and/or its designated representative,
has the right to audit the project records, including technical and financial data, of
the Department of Transportation, the Sponsoring Agency, and any
subconsultants at any time during the course of the project and for four years from
the date of the final closeout of the project. Audits will be conducted in
accordance with Generally Accepted Govemment Auditing Standards.
c
4. SPECIFIC PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS
4.1 Project Sehedule and Cost
See Project Programming Request Form, attached as Exhibit A.
4.2 Project Scone
See Project Study ReportJProject Study Report Equivalent, attached as Exhibit B.
4.3 Project Scone
See Project Benefits Form, attached as Exhibit C.
4.4 Other Project Snecific Provisions and Conditions
Not applicable.
o
Page 2 of 3
C09023
c
c
o
Gary C. Ovitt
President
San Bernardino Associated Governments
DATE
City Manager
City of San Bernardino
DATE
Will Kempton
Director
California Department of Transportation
DATE
John F Barna, Jr.
Executive Director
California Transportation Commission
DATE
Approved as to Form by:
Jean-Rene Basle
SANBAG County Counsel
DATE
roved as to Form by:
J es F. Penman
ity Attorney
City of San Bernardino
2- ".1"
Page 3 00
C09023
,.
AA_""
2008 Project Programming Request
(Project Information)
Exhibit" A"
General Instructions
o
o New Project o Amendment (Existing Project) I Date: 0711 0/08
Caltrana Dlatrlet EA PPNO MPOID . TCRP No.
08 200850 N/A
County Route/Corridor Pro eet Snonaorllead Aaenev MPO Element
SBD SAN BAG SCAG MT
Prolect Title .
Palm Ave Railroad Grade Separation
PMBk PM Ahd Project MarfContllct Phone E-mail Add.....
Gilbert Betancourt 909-886-3971 gbetancourt@sanbag.ca.gov
Location. Prolect Llmlta. DeeerlDtlon. Seciii8 of Work Lealalatlve Deecfllit10n
In the City of San Bemardino and the County of San Bemardino, from 1000' east of at-grade on Palm Ave and
1000' north and south of grade on Cajon Blvd, construct grade separation (likely highway over rail) and widen
Palm and Cajon from 2 to 4 lanes
ComDonent ImDlementln" A"enev AB 3090 Letter of No Praludlee
PA&EO SAN BAG
PS&E SAN BAG
Rlaht of Wav SAN BAG
Construction SANBAG
ILealslative Olatrlctll .
AsaemblY: 63 I Senate: 132
Conareaalonal: 43
PUrDOM and Need
Palm Ave is a major east-west arterial that carries approximately 5,300 vehicles per day. The estimated 94
freight and two passenger trains that cross Palm Ave every day create substantial traffic delays and disrupt
access to a developing industriallwarehouse area nearby. Separating the railroad crossing from Palm Ave will
mitigate community impacts of goods movement and provide more reliable access to warehouse and truck
facilities.
ProIect Beneflta r
Railroad grade separations increase travel reliability on major roadways for both the community and truck
traffic, improve air quality, and eliminate potential conflicts between vehicular and train traffic, which all act to
mitigate the impact of freight movement on communities. This grade separation will eliminate gate down time
of 6.6 hours per day in 2030 and is estimated to reduce 105 daily vehicle ho~rs of delay in 2030.
proIeetMlllIlItOne .' : .Dete
Proiect Studv Reoort Approved N1A
~n Environmental (PA&EDI Phase IDoCumentJm! N/A 07/01/08
Circulate Draft Environmental Document CECA SE
Draft Proiect Reoort 06130/09
End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone\ 12/30/09
IBeein Desian (PS&E) Phase 01/01/10
End Desion Phase (Readv to List for Advertisement Milestone I 06/30/12
Beain Riaht of Way Phase 07/01/10
End Riaht of Wav Phase (Rioht of Wav Certification Milestone) 06/30/12
Beain Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone) 07/01/12
End Construction Phase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestonel 12/30/13
Beoin Closeout Phase 01/01/14
End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report) 06/30/14
c
c
Fonn Version Date: 1011107
c
c
o
<'J!"
.
.....
2008 Project Programming Request
. (Funding Information)
(dollars inthOusands and escalated to the programmed year)
Date" 07/10108
COunty T CT_ I PPNO I TCRP _No. I EA
SaD I 08 I 0 I N1A T 0
Prolect 11tIIi: IPalm Ave Railroad Grade Separation
Existing Total Project Cost
Component Prior 08/08 09/10 10111 11/12 12/13 13/14+ Total Im"l.menll.... Aaenc'I
E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PS&E 0 0 Ii 0 0 0 0 0
RIW SUP (CT] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON SUP (CT] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-- --------
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,~ __n
CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PI'ClpClSOd Total Project Cool
E&P (PA&ED) 750 0 0 0 0 0 0 750
PS&E 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000
.
"!iW SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON SUP (c:1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RIW 0 0 1,128 0 0 0 0 1,128
CoN .,
0 0 0 0 31,300 0 0 31,300
TOTAL 750 0 3,128 0 31,300 0 0 35,178
Fund No.1: I Program COde
.,
ExIetlng Funding
Component Prior 08109 09/10 10111 11/12 12/13 13/14+ Total Funding AeencY
E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RIW SUP (CT] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON SUP (CT] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RIW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Propoeed Funding Notee
E&P (PA&ED) 0 Proposed TCIF
-,
PS&E ,~ ~- 0
RIW SUP (CT] 0
-' -
CON SUP (CT] 0
RIW 0
CON 9,390 9,391
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 ',3110 0 0 ',3110
Fund No.2: I Program Code
ExIetlng Funding
Component PrlOf 08109 08/10 10111 11/12 12113 13/14+ Total Funding AeencY
E&P (PA&ED) . 0 0 0 0 0 , . 0
PS&E 0 . . . . '0 " , . 0
RIW SUP (CT] ,0 0 . .. . 0 O:~, . .
CON SUP (CT] 0 00' C. '0 , . 0 . .
RIW 0 0 .0 0 " 0 0 . ,. .' .
CON 0 0 ---;c 0 . 0 . . 0
TOTAL 0 0,"'" i,.. . ' :,.0 .... 0 . 0
Proposed Funding Notee
E&P (PA&ED) , . .0 Developer Impact Fees
PS&E 0
RIW SUP (CT] .'.
CON SUP (CT] '., 0
RIW . :0
CON 5,136 "1M
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 6.111I '. 0 0 5;1.
Form Version Dete: lIY1/07
10f2
c
c
o
,.
IIitttN
2008 Project Programming Request
(Funding Information)
(dollars in thousands and escalated to the programmed year)
Dolo- 07110108
County 1 CT DIotrlcl I PPNO 1 -rCRP P_ No. I EA
SaD I 08 I 0 T NlA I 0
PI'OIect TItle: IPalm Ave Railroad Gracie Separation
Fund No.3: I Program Code
Exlotlng Funding
Component Prior 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12113 13/14+ Total Funding Agoncy
~A&ED). 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R1W SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R1W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Proposed Funding NoleS
E&P (PA&ED) 750 750 San Bernardino County
~_. -- -- --
PS&E ---- ~---- .n 2,000 -~- 2,000 Measure I
- -.-
!lfW SUP (CT) -- -.-- 0
CON SUP (CT) ---- 0
R1W 1,126 1,126
----
CON 16.774 18,n4
TOTAL 750 0 3,128 0 18,n4 0 0 20,_
Fund No. .: I Program Code
ExIotlng Funding
Component Prior 08/09 09110 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14+ Total Fund.lng Agency
E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
PS&E O. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R1W SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R1W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Proposed Funding Not..
E&P (PA&ED) 0
- ----- _. -.--
PS&E --- 0
-.- -- -
R1W SUP (CT) 0
----- .. -----
CON SUP (CT) 1------ '-_____. 0
-. ---
R1W 0
CON 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fund No. 8: I Program Cod.
ExIotJng Funding
Component Prior 08109 09110 10/11 11/12 12113 13/14+ Total FundlngAgoncy .
E&P (PA&ED) 0 . . 0 0 0 '. 0 C
PS&E . . . . .. . 0 . 0
R1W SUP (CT) 0 . . . 0 0 . 0
CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0
~ 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0
CON . . .,. 0 . . c . 0 -. 0 < 0
TOTAL 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0
P~ed Funding NoleS
E&P (PA&ED) 0
PS&E .' ,. 0
R1W SUP (CT) h.' 0
~UP (CT) ---- ----- 0
R1W . 0
-
CON 0
TOTAL 0 . . 0 '0 a 0 0 01- C'.- a
Fonn Version Date: 1011107
2012
c
c
o
"
EXHIBIT "B"
DRAFT Project Study Report
Palm Avenue Grade Separation
of the BNSF Railroad
Prepared for
San Bernardino Associated Governments
(SANBAG)
July 2008
Governments
" CH2MHILL
... 2280 Market Street, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92501
SAN BAG
Working Together
PALMA VEEAAL VT ASKPSAJUL V2008DAAFTV2.00c
c
c
o
,
Foreword
The objective of this document is to clearly define the design concepts and the scope and
cost of the proposed Project. This report will be utilized during preparation of the final
project report, Statutory Exemption (SE), permitting, final plans, specifications, and
estimates (P5&E) that will be used to construct the Project.
PALMA VEEARL YT ASKPSRJUl Y20Q8DRAFTV2.00c
c
Contents
Section
Page
o
1.0 Project Introduction ..............................................................................................................1
1,1 Project Location,................., ..............,.. ........, ...... ,.. ....,..,...., ,.....,....., ..., ,.... ,..,........,.... 1
1.2 Project Background .....,.,..",.,....,..,..,.,..........,.....,...,.,........"...,..,....,..,.".,.,........."..".1
2.0 Proj ect Build Alternatives ....... ....... ......... ............................................................................. 2
2.1.1 Alternative 1: .................,.........,.......................................,.....,....................................2
Pahn A venue Roadwav Overcrossing .,.....................,..................,.................,........,........... 2
2.1.2 Geometries ....,..,.,...............,....,.,......,......,......,..,......,................,..............,........,...,...".... 3
Horizontal Alignment ........,....................,.......................,.,.......................,..,............ 3
Vertical Alignment ....,...............................................................................................3
2.1.3 Structures...........,.......".............,...............................,..... ....................,....,...................... 4
2.1.4 Grading and Drainage .............................................................,.............,......................4
2.1.5 Stage Construction........................,........ ,....................................................................... 4
2.1.6 Utilities......................................... ................................................................................... 4
2.1.7 Right-of-Way.................... .............................................................................................. 5
2.2.1 Alternative 2: ... ..................................................................................... ...................... 5
Pahn A venue Roadwav Undercrossing & Railroad Bride:e .............................................5
2.2.2 Geometries .....,...........................,..............,............,......................,..,.. ..............,.,........... 5
Horizontal Alignment...........~........................................,...................... ,................... 5
Vertical Alignment................... ...........,... ......................,........................,........~......... 6
2.2.3 Structures....................................................................................,................................... 6
2.2.4 Grading and Drainage ......,....................................................................,...,..................6
2.2.5 Stage Construction....................................,................................,............................. ......6
2.2.6 Utilities..,.....,..............................,....................................... ..................:.......,.................. 7
2.2.7 Right-of-Way ..............................,...................,.......,....................................................... 7
2.3.1 Alternative 3: ........................................,............................................. ,....., ,............... 7
Pahn Avenue Roadway Overcrossine & Railroad Trench ...............................,............... 7
2.3.2 Geometries...........,...........,....................,.............,.....................,....,....................,........... 7
Horizontal Alignment .,..,....,..........,..........................................................................7
Vertical Alignment ...............,........... .......,..,..............,.......,...........' ........ ..,................ 8
2.3.3 Structures.,.,..,........,.......,..,............................,....................,..,........................................ 8
2.3.4 Grading and Drainage .......,.....,...,..........................................,..,..................................8
2.3.5 Stage Construction.............................,...................,...,.......,...........................,............... 8
2.3.6 Utilities...................,.,..............,..,...,......,.,.....,.........................,......,.............,.,................ 9
2.3,7 Right-of- Way......................,.,..".......,....,..,....,.....,..,...........,."..,......,.......................,....,. 9
2.4.1 Alternative 4: ..........,.........................................................,............... ,.,...,.....,...,......... 9
Pahn A venue Roadway Undercrossine: & Elevated Railroad,......................................... 9
2.4.2 Geometries...",.................................,............,.................,..,..,...........".".,...,....".."..,...... 9
Horizontal Alignment .......,............................,............ ........,.................,.....,............. 9
Vertical Alignment ..,........:...... .............. .....,..,......... .............. .....,........ ....,...............10
2.4.3 Structures............,........,..,..........,.,......,'......".........,..,...,..,.......,..........,."....,..,...... ......... 10
c
xxxx
COt'HENTZ
3.0
4.0
2.4.4 Grading and Drainage ................................................................................................10
2.4.5 Stage Construction....................................................................................................... 10
2.4.6 Utilities ....... ..... ....... ........ ....... ....... ..................... ............ ... ... ....... .... ........ ........ ..... .......... 11
2.4.7 Right-of-Way.. ................. ..... ......... ....... ....... ........ ............... ................ ......... .................11
T raffk...... ........ ............. ......................... .............. .................. ............. ......... ........:.................. 11
Geotechnical.........................................................................................................................12
c
5.0 Environment .........................................................................................................................12
6.0 Cooperative Agreements ....................................................................................................12
7.0 Railroad ........... ....... ......... ........ .... ......... ............................ ................................ ................ ..... 12
8.0 Rejected Alternatives ...........................................................................................................13
9.0 Cost......................................................................................................................................... 13
10.0 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................13
Appendixes
c
A
B
C
D
Vicinity and Location Maps
City of San Bernardino General Plan
Alternative 1 Conceptual Roadway Plan/Profile/Typical Section
Alternative 1 Conceptual Bridge General Plan
o
T012oo5OO 1 SCOiflAlMA VEEARl YT ASKPSRJ Ul Y20080RAFTV2_00C/OSOO6oo01
1\1
c
c
o
.e::.>
.
.
1.0 Project Introduction
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), acting on behalf of the City of San
Bernardino (City) and San Bernardino County (County) and in cooperation with BNSF
(Burlington Northern Santa Fe), is proposing the construction of the Palm Avenue Grade
Separation Project (Project). The project consists of a new structure, approach embankments,
and associated roadway improvements to grade separate Palm A venue from the BNSF
railroad tracks. The construction of a grade separation at this location is needed to remove
the conflicts between vehicular and railroad traffic that are increasing due to the increasing
volume of goods movement through San Bernardino County. The location of the Project is
identified on the location map and vicinity map presented in Appendix A.
1.1 Project Location
The proposed Project is located in southwestern San Bernardino County along the
northwestern jurisdiction of the City of San Bernardino and unincorporated San Bernardino
County. The Project is generally located between Interstate 215 and Cajon Wash. The limits
of the Project will occur from near Industrial Parkway (625 feet south of the 1-215/Palm
Avenue interchange) to the Union Pacific Railroad R/W that parallel Cajon Wash. Palm
A venue currently exists as a four-lane paved street south across the at-grade signalized
BNSF railroad crossing immediately adjacent to Cajon Boulevard where it terminates at the
stop controlled intersection with Institution Road and Cajon Boulevard.
1.2 Project Background
SANBAG proposes a grade separation at the at-grade crossing of Palm A venue with the
BNSF Railroad. The rail facility, with three existing tracks, and one future line proposed,
carries BNSF freight service and passenger service through Amtrak.
. Several alternatives have been identified to access potential configuration for the grade
separation project:
. Palm Avenue roadway overcrossing
. Palm Avenue roadway undercrossing and BNSF railroad bridge
. BNSF trench by lowering the tracks and Palm Avenue overcrossing
. BNSF elevated by raising the tracks and Palm A venue undercrossing and BNSF railroad
bridge
. "No Build" (no change, therefore not discussed)
In review of these alternatives, the City of San Bernardino General Plan presented in
Appendix B must to be considered. The City of San Bernardino General Plan identifies Palm
A venue as a Secondary Arterial and Cajon Boulevard as a Major Arterial. One goal of the
project is to account for ultimate expansion considerations in the development of the grade
separation and adopt a design that is compatible with future development and both
T012005001 $CQ/P ALMA VEEARl YT ASKPSRJUl Y200BDRAFTV2 .DoClOSOO6000 1
5-,
c
.
.
.
.
.
.
c
o
roadway and railroad expansion. All build alternatives will require acquisition of new right-
of-way.
The immediate benefits of the Project include air quality improvements and reduced delays
associated with the existing at-grade crossing. Emergency vehicle response times will be
improved. Future phases of the Project will include final design, right of way acquisition,
public outreach and community involvement to provide insight to the project footprint,
cost, and funding sources to be utilized for the grade separation.
Eligible facilities for Trade Corridors Improvement Fund(TCIF) allocations are those major
grade crossings that will provide a regional benefit and that are shown on the Circulation
Element of the City, County, and Regional General Plans. The Project meets these selection
criterion and the local agencies involved want to deliver this improvement to the local
community to meet these key objectives:
Eliminate the signalized at-grade crossing between the railroad and Palm A venue.
Provide unimpeded access for emergency vehicles to cross the tracks.
Reduce traffic congestion and improve LOS of roadways and intersections near the
project.
Improve air quality by eliminating idle vehicles at the existing crossing.
Complete a preliminary study to guide the final engineering and environmental
clearance phase.
Assess potential alternatives previously identified based on physical and economical
constraints to develop a preferred alternative.
2.0 Project Build Alternatives
Four conceptual build alternatives will be discussed in this section to assess the physical and
economical impacts associated with the Palm A venue Grade Separation. Based on an
understanding of constraints and economic factors for each alternative, a ranking system
can be established to compare the alternatives based on the primary project.
2.1.1
Alternative 1:
Palm Avenue Roadwav Overcrossinq
This alternative proposes a new centerline for Palm A venue between Industrial Parkway
and the connection with Institution Road. As illustrated in Appendix A the centerline
meanders northerly to provide a purely transverse crossing of the BNSF R/W. The off
alignment modifications to the centerline under Alternative I are proposed to incorporate
basic design standards and address local access requirements for the roadway and local
circulation needs. Palm Avenue, at "ultimate buildout", will include a total of four travel
PALMA VEEARl YT ASKP$RJUl Y2008DRAFTV2.DOC
c
lanes. Two basic typical sections will be utilized under Alternative 1 as illustrated in
Appendix A. Cut-and-fill slopes outside the roadway prism will be sloped at a ratio of 1
vertical to 2 horizontal. Where topography requires slope construction outside the basic
roadway right-of-way (R/W), the City and County may opt to acquire an additional slope
easement (variable in width). The Project aerial, roadway alignment, and basic grading fill
limits are all presented on the layout plan shown in Appendix C.
For all alternatives paved roadway surfaces will consist of layers of asphalt concrete,
aggregate base, and aggregate subbase placed on top of graded native and imported
material. Concrete sidewalks will be constructed adjacent the east curb and gutter at
appropriate locations where they are warranted by pedestrian traffic. In addition, drainage
pipes or other drainage features will be constructed to maintain the existing flow of water in
the project area. Major drainages near Cajon Wash will not be impacted or altered with
Project improvements. Curb and gutter will be constructed on both sides of Palm A venue to
capture drainage from the roadway surfaces and convey it to an appropriate outlet.
Storrnwater pollution prevention techniques will be considered and implemented as
appropriate to allow for treatment of roadway runoff prior to it being discharged.
2.1.2 Geometries
c
Horizontal Alignment
This alternative proposes to construct a roadway overcrossing above BNSF tracks in an off
existing alignment just north of existing Palm Avenue at grade crossing. See Appendix C for
the concept plan for this alternative. The Project will require new right-of-way on.both the
north as south side of the BNSF corridor to accommodate the fill approach slopes to the
abutments and a connection from the grade separation back to the intersection of Institution
Road and Cajon Boulevard. Retaining walls could be considered to further reduce fill slope
limits and the overall footprint for the alternative.
Vertical Alignment
Vertical clearance requirements for a railroad range from 23.5 to 26.0 feet. This alternative
maintains a clearance greater than 23.5 feet as illustrated on the concept profile attached in
Appendix C. The portrayed profile and span lengths accommodates future widening of
Cajon Boulevard to its ultimate section width and allows for a future track additions in the
BNSF right-of-way. This type of roadway overcrossing and connection will reduce direct
impacts to Historic Route 66 (Cajon Boulevard) by isolating improvements to the existing
intersection connection.
o
Profile elements for Palm Avenue in this concept alternative will accommodate current and
future user needs. The design accommodates pedestrian access on the approach slopes with
meandering sidewalks. The meandering sidewalk is utilized due to a sustained profile
grades steeper the 5.0%. The implementation of the meandering sidewalk will maintain
acceptable grades under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) for connection to
adjacent driveways and roadways. By maintaining a steeper roadway profile and through
the use of the meandering sidewalk as noted above, a reduced roadway improvement limit
PALMA VEEARl YT ASKP$RJUL Y2008DRAFTV2 DOC
c
c
o
can be maintained along Palm A venue and Institution Road. This approach minimized local
business impacts, construction costs, and R/W needs.
2.1.3 Structures
Structural selection is a key factor in design of this facility due to the need to maintain active
rail lines on the BNSF corridor during construction. Alternative 1 will require a three span
roadway structure to cross the BNSF right-of-way which includes three existing tracks and
one future track. The overall layout and bent configuration illustrated in the attached
Conceptual Bridge General Plan, presented in Appendix D, meets horizontal and vertical
requirements in addition the accommodation of a future track and maintenance road inside
the BNSF corridor. The use of a pre-cast girder structure is proposed under this alternative
to limit construction exposure time to the BNSF facilities for crews and equipment and
eliminate the need for false work.
Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation Projects were followed in the grade separation
structure design illustrated in the Palm A venue Conceptual Bridge General Plan attached in
Appendix D. In addition to this standard, the latest Caltrans' design manuals and standards
for roadway structures related to this overcrossing alternative have been followed to
illustrate the concept General Plan for the Alternative 1.
2.1.4 Grading and Drainage
Grading and drainage are not a concern with this alternative based on the fact all facilities
will be above existing grade and convey roadway runoff away from the site through
convention gravity pipe or surface flow to local storm drain systems. Cajon Wash which is
adjacent to the south limits of the project will continue to receive runoff from the Project.
Without the need for significant excavation the potential to encounter local ground water is
very low for this alternative and the impact to adjacent monitoring wells is considered
negligible. This alternative will not utilize any pumping facilities for removal of on or off
site runoff and will further study treatment opportunities as required for the improvement
area.
2.1.5 Stage Construction
The bulk of the construction work under Alternative 1 is off alignment work and will allow
for the local streets and at-grade crossing to remain active during construction of the grade
separation. The construction will not require local access closures on Palm A venue and will
not require any shoofly to manage rail and passenger operations on the BNSF lines.
2.1.6 Utilities
In the off alignment location and fill conditions encountered for Alternative 1 there virtually
no potential to encounter a local ground water contamination plume and the local
monitoring wells. In addition, all the existing undergroimd utilities in the general project
area could remain beneath the local paved streets and railroad at-grade crossing which will
PALMA VEEARl YT ASKP$RJUL V.2008DRAFTV2.DOC
c
be removed or abandoned in place. Relocation of overhead electric and telephone lines
along the south side of Cajon Boulevard will be necessary to accorrunodate the overcrossing
structure and fill slopes. Eliminating impact to all existing underground utilities with a
"protect-in-place" approach will be of significant cost savings in both the design and
construction phases of the project.
2.1.7 Right-of-Way
This concept alternative as shown in Appendix C is proposed to be constructed as an
interim two-lane secondard facility south of Industrial Parkway to preserve construction
dollars. The decision to consider a interim section width is based on local service needs and
is compatible with ultimate city sections under the City of San Bernardino General Plan. All
right-of-way for the ultimate section width will be encompassed by the fill slopes of the
current project. Any excess property acquired on adjacent parcels for the grade separation
could be sold after construction at the discretion of the City and SANBAG.
2.2.1
Alternative 2:
c
Palm Avenue Roadway Undererossing & Railroad BridQ.!
This alternative proposes to construct a roadway undercrossing below the BNSF tracks on a
railroad bridge. This configuration creates a depressed intersection at Cajon Boulevard on
the existing alignment to maintain intersection connections in the project area. The Project
will require new right-oi-way on both the north as south side of the BNSF corridor to
accorrunodate retaining walls and to maintain local street connections.
Palm A venue in this alternative will include a total of four travel lanes. Roadway specific
typical sections as illustrated in the City of San Bernardino General Plan will be utilized
under Alternative 2 to detennine retaining wall locations to retain cut slope location along
Palm Avenue, Institution Road, and Cajon Boulevard. Cut slopes outside the roadway
prism will be sloped at a ratio of 1 vertical to 2 horizontal to reduce the need for walls where
deemed feasible. Where topography requires slope construction outside the basic roadway
right-oi-way (R/W) under the City General Plan, the City may opt to acquire an additional
slope easement (variable in width) to reduce the need for full take considerations for the
Project.
2.2.2 Geometries
o
Horizontal Alignment
The alignment of the existing roadways will be maintained and a depressed signalized
intersection will be created at Cajon Boulevard with connection to Palm A venue and
Institution Road by bounding the roadway R/W's with retaining walls.
PALMA VEEARl YT ASKPSRJUl Y200SDRAFTV2_00c
c
Vertical Alignment
Vertical clearance requirements for a roadway are less than for a railroad, ranging from ]5.0
to ]6.5 feet. This alternative requires less of a profile change on Palm Avenue than
Alternative] due to the reduced vertical clearance required for the facility. The limits of
work will end up being much longer along Cajon Boulevard and Institution Road due to the
depression needs on of these roadbeds and need for retaining walls to transition to a cut
sections. This type of roadway grading and re-profiling will be classified as direct impact to
Historic Route 66 (Cajon Boulevard). Profile design attributes will address pedestrian and
bicycle needs within the facility improvements and recognize the need to accommodate
suitable access on the approach slopes and adjacent roadways.
2.2.3 Structures
c
Structural selection is a key factor in design of this facility due to the need to maintain active
rail lines on the BNSF corridor during construction. Alternative 2 will require a railroad
structure to cross Palm A venue as well as temporary rail structures or trestles to lower Palm
A venue while maintaining three active rail lines. The overall layout and bent configuration
must meet horizontal and vertical requirements in addition to the accommodation in width
for future track on the railroad structure. Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation Projects will
be followed in the rail bridge designs which include the American Railway Engineers
Association (AREA) and American Railway Engineering and Maintenance (AREMA)
requirements for this roadway undercrossing alternative.
2.2.4 Grading and Drainage
Grading and drainage are a concern with this alternative based on the creation of a sump
condition by lowering the roadbeds with retaining walls. A storm drain pump.system to
convey roadway runoff will be needed for this alternative. Pump station elements will
increase project cost in design, construction, and long term maintenance. One other concern
with this type of excavation and lowering of the roadbed is the potential to encounter local
ground water which has been identified as contaminated and currently being monitored to
identify contamination levels and plume limits.
2.2.5 Stage Construction
The primary concern related to staging for this alternative is the detour of local traffic on
surrounding surface streets during the on alignment construction and the need to construct
three railroad shoofly's to meet BNSF stage construction requirements. The construction of
this alternative will require a full closure and detour of the existing at-grade crossing or
reduced capacity in local roadway traffic with lane reductions if the grade separation were
built in halves. The shoofly requirements add to the cost since these are temporary facilities
for construction purposes and increase all project cost, coordination effort, and the duration
of construction.
o
PALMA VEEARl YT ASKPSRJUl Y2008DRAFTV2.DOC
c
c
o
~,.
.
2.2.6 Utilities
In the on alignment location for Alternative 2 there is a potential to encounter a local ground
water contamination plume and its local monitoring wells, Existing underground utilities
inside the general project area are beneath the local paved streets and railroad right-of-way,
Multiple facility relocations will be required based on roadway profile changes associated
with the depression of multiple roadbeds, Relocation of overhead electric and telephone
lines along the south side of Cajon Boulevard will be necessary to accommodate the
retaining walls or cut slopes, Impact to all existing underground utilities will be a significant
cost and risk to the project in both the design and construction phases of the project.
2.2.7 Right-of-Way
All right-of-way for the ultimate section width will be required to be purchased due to the
significant investment in retaining walls proposed to be built for the depressed roadway
option under Alternative 2, Under this alternative it is not anticipated excess property will
remain to be sold off at the discretion of the City and SANBAG.
2.3.1
Alternative 3:
Palm Avenue Roadwav OvererossinQ & Railroad Trench
This alternative proposes to construct a roadway overcrossing above a depressed railroad
trench to carry BNSF tracks or as a design variation could consider a slightly elevated
roadway intersection at Cajon Boulevard with Palm A venue and Institution ~oad, The
existing roadway alignments will be held in place to maintain intersection connections in
the project area, The Project will not require new right-of-way since retaining walls will be
confined to both the north as south side of the BNSF corridor,
2.3.2 Geometries
Horizontal Alignment
The alignment of the existing roadways will be maintained and a signalized intersection will
be created at Cajon Boulevard with connections to Palm A venue and Institution Road, At
the existing intersection a slightly elevated mound or crest will be constructed, The crest or
mound as it is referred to will serve as a fill pad for the roadways to be placed on to allow
for a at grade intersection to be constructed slightly above the surrounding and existing
ground elevations,
PALMA VEEARl YT A$KP$RJ UL Y2008DRAFTV2.DOC
c
Vertical Alignment
Vertical clearance requirements for a railroad are more than a roadway, ranging from 23.5 to
26.0 feet. This alternative requires less of a profile change on Palm A venue than Alternative
1 due to the depressed railroad. Any roadway grading and re-profiling under the design
variation with a partially elevated intersection will be classified as direct impact to Historic
Route 66 (Cajon Boulevard). Profile attributes will be required to address pedestrian and
bicycle needs with the facility improvements and the need to accommodate suitable access
on the approach slopes and adjacent roadways.
Re-profiling of the existing railroad will be required. The existing track grade of 2.25%nms
northward toward Cajon Pass. With this existing, and already steep rail profile grade, an
additional change in grade of the tracks is not considered a reasonable option due to the
long reaching affect this will have on the track re-profiling. Significant impact to adjacent
crossings and side tracks in the area will occur as a result of this alternative. In addition,
there is concern related to physical limitation of freight and passenger service on a steeper
grade which will be introduced on existing BNSF lines. This major track adjustment will
significantly change the rail profile and adversely affect rail service on the BNSF line.
2.3.3 Structures
o
Structural selection is a key factor in the design of this facility due to the need to maintain
active rail lines on the BNSF corridor during construction. Alternative 3 will require a
roadway structure to cross the BNSF right-of-way as well as temporary rail lines while
newly depressed mainline tracks are constructed. The overall layout and bent configuration
will need to meet horizontal and vertical requirements in addition the accommodation of a
future track and maintenance road in the trench. Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation
Projects will need tobe followed in the grade separation structure design in addition to the
latest Caltrans' design manuals and standards for roadway structures related to this
overcrossing alternative.
2.3.4 Grading and Drainage
Grading'and drainage are a concern with this alternative based on the creation of a sump
condition by lowering the rail line. A storm drain pump system to convey railway trench
nmoff will be need for this alternative. One other concern with this type of excavation and
lowering of the railroad is the potential to encounter local ground water which has been
identified as contaminated and currently being monitored to identify contamination levels
and plume limits. In this condition a pump system will have to be designed, installed, and
maintained. Ownership and the maintenance of the pump system will not be acceptable to
BNSF.
2.3.5 Stage Construction
o
This alternative requires staging of local traffic on surface streets during the on alignment
construction and the need to construct three temporary railroad trestles and shoofly's to
meet BNSF stage construction requirements to maintain all existing lines during
PALMA VEEARl YT ASKPSAJUl Y,OOO DRAFTV2.DOC
c
o
c
construction. The construction will require a full closure and detour of the existing at-grade
crossing or reduced capacity in local roadway traffic with lane reductions if the grade
separation were built in halves relative to the street centerlines and beneath temporary
trestles.
2.3.6 Utilities
In the on alignment location for Alternative 3 improvements there is a potential to
encounter a local ground water contamination plume and its local monitoring wells. In
addition, conflicts with all the existing underground utilities in the general project area will
be encountered since all facilities are beneath the local streets and railroad right-of-way.
With the depression of the BNSF tracks and maintenance road this trench feature will severe
all longitudinal facilities in Palm A venue. Relocation of overhead electric and telephone
lines along the south side of Cajon Boulevard will be necessary if the design variation to this
alternative were considered. Impact to all existing underground utilities and railroad
infrastructure will be a significant cost and risk to the project in both the design and
construction phases of the project. Added coordination will also be required under this
alternative due to the large number of BNSF infrastructure elements impacted in the
reconfiguration of tracks over a substantial distance both north and south of Palm Avenue.
2.3.7 Right-of-Way
No right-of-way will be required to be purchased due to the significant investment in
retaining walls proposed to be built at the existing railroad R/W to create the depressed
railroad trench for Alternative 3.
2.4.1
Alternative 4:
Palm Avenue Roadwav Undererossing & Elevated Railroad
This alternative proposes to construct a roadway undercrossing below a partially elevated
railroad line and create a slightly depressed intersection at Cajon Boulevard on the existing
alignment to maintain intersection connections in the. project area. The Project will require
new right-of-way on both the north as south side of the BNSF corridor to accommodate
retaining walls and to maintain local street connections.
2.4.2 Geometries
Horizontal Alignment
The alignment of the existing roadways will be maintained and a signalized intersection will
be created at Cajon Boulevard with connections to Palm A venue and Institution Road. At
PAlMAVEEARl YTASKPSRJUL Y2008DRAFTV2DOC
c
the existing intersection a slightly depressed intersection or sag will be constructed for the
roadways to be placed on to allow for an at grade intersection slightly below the existing
ground elevation.
Vertical Alignment
Vertical clearance requirements for a roadway are less than a railroad, ranging from 15.0 to
16.5 feet. This alternative requires less of a profile change on Palm A venue than Alternative
1 due to the partially elevated railroad. Similar to Alternative 3, the limits of work will end
up being much longer along Cajon Boulevard and Institution Road due to the depressed
approach slopes for the three independent roadbeds. This type of roadway grading and re-
profiling will be classified as direct impact to Historic Route 66 (Cajon Boulevard). Profile
design elements will address pedestrian and bicycle needs with the facility improvements
and the need to accommodate suitable access on the approach slopes and adjacent
roadways.
Similar to the rail constraints noted in Alternative 3, and as noted above, re-profiling of the
existing railroad will be required on a segment of the BNSF Line which has an existing track
grade of 2.25% running northward toward Cajon Pass. Adjustment of the existing steep
railroad profile is not practical for rail operations.
2.4.3 Structures
o
Structural selection for this alternative is similar to Alternative 2 and will require a railroad
structure to cross Palm A venue as well as temporary rail structures to partially lower Palm
Avenue. The overall layout and bent configuration must meet horizontal and vertical
requirements in addition the accommodation of a future track. Guidelines for Railroad Grade
Separation Projects will be followed in the rail bridge designs which include the American
Railway Engineers Association (AREA) and American Railway Engineering and
Maintenance (AREMA) requirements for this roadway undercrossing and elevated railroad
alternative.
2.4.4 Grading and Drainage
Grading and drainage are a concern with this alternative based on the creation of a sump
condition by partially lowering the surrounding roadbeds. A storm drain pump system to
convey roadway runoff will be need for this alternative. One other concern with this type of
excavation and lowering of the roadway is the potential to encounter local ground water
which has been identified as contaminated and currently being monitored to identify
contamination levels and plume limits..
2.4.5 Stage Construction
o
This alternative, from a stage construction and traffic handling standpoint is similar to
Alternative 2. The constrained work area requires staging and detouring of local traffic on
surface streets during the on alignment construction. Alternative 2 requires the need to
erect three temporary railroad shoofly's and temporary trestles to meet BNSF stage
PALMA VEEARl YT A$KPSRJ Ul Y2008DRA:FTV2.DOC
c
constmction requirements. BNSF requirements state all active lines will remain open during
all stages of constmction. The construction will require a full closure and detour of the
existing at-grade crossing traffic or reduced capacity with lane reductions if the grade
separation were built in halves.
2.4.6 Utilities
In the on alignment location for Alternative 4 there is a potential to encounter a local ground
water contamination plume and its local monitoring wells. Existing underground utilities in
the general project area are beneath the local streets and railroad right-of-way. Conflicts are
certain with the partial depression of multiple roadbeds and intersections and the elevated
BNSF corridor. Relocation of overhead electric and telephone lines along the south side of
Cajon Boulevard and the west side of Institution Road will be necessary to accommodate the
retaining walls or cut slopes. Impact to all existing underground utilities and railroad
infrastructure will be a significant cost to the project in both the design and construction
phases of the project. Added coordination will also be required under this alternative due to
the large number of BNSF infrastructure elements impacted in the reconfiguration of tracks
over a substantial distance reaching well north and south of the existing at grade crossing
for PaIm Avenue.
2.4.7 Right-ot-Way
o
All right-of-way for the ultimate section width will be required to be purchased due to the
significant investment in retaining walls proposed to be built for the three partially elevated
roadbed options under Alternative 4. Under this alternative it is not anticipated excess
property will remain to be sold off at the discretion of the City and SANBAG.
3.0 Traffic
The purpose of the traffic study under the project report phase will be to assess local
capacity and level of service of the preferred alternative. Obtaining detailed traffic
information related to current local conditions will be the primary initial focus. Forecasted
traffic demands have been developed by SANBAG b.ased on land use models, zoning, and
anticipated development in the area of the grade separation project. Growth factors and the
land use models will be reviewed to identify the design life capacity of the preferred
alternative. Further analysis and review of the data will aid the project team in identifying
necessary lane numbers and turn pocket lengths for intersections within the project limits to
maintain appropriate levels of service.
o
PALMAVEEARlYT ASKP$RJUl Y200aDRAFTV2 DOC
c
c
10
I
,
I
I
,
I
,
4.0 Geotechnical
Existing maps and documents will be collected and reviewed for the geotechnical task
under of the project report phase. Field borings and a geotechnical report will be completed
in the project report phase to document project site soils, suggest foundation selection
criteria, slope requirements, and pavement section determinations for the preferred
alternative.
5.0 Environment
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), railroad grade separations
projects are Statutory Exempt from the need for an et;\vironmental CEQAdocument
providing no requirements cause the project to produce a higher level environmental
document. Under the project report phase of work, it is anticipated that the SE will be
pursued and no additional environmental permitting will be accomplished for the project.
6.0 Cooperative Agreements
Several agreements will be required based on the location of the Palm Avenue Grade
Separation Project. These include and are not limited to the following:
. Cooperative Agreement between the County and City of San Bernardino
. Cooperative Agreement between the City of San Bernardino and SANBAG
. BNSF Construction and Maintenance Agreement
. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Construction Agreement
7.0 Railroad
A meeting was held with BNSF, SANBAG, City, and County representatives to discuss the
Project. Operational impacts to the BNSF Line near Palm A venue as related to the Project
PALMAVEEARl YTASKPSRJUl Y20080RAFTV2.DOC
",.
.
c
were discussed along with the build alternatives. BNSF representatives received copies of
the concept alternative to discuss and review internally for clearance requirements and
overall accommodations for future track additions.
BNSF representatives stated all existing rail lines at the time of construction will have to be
maintained and remain open to rail traffic. Final cost share allocations are currently
forecasted by SANBAG at 10% for the BNSF share of the project.
8.0 Rejected Alternatives
c
No alternatives, including the "No Build" Alternative, have been rejected at this point. Only
the roadway over rail concept was drawn in this early assessment phase based on the fact it
utilizes a new alignment concept and the illustration adds substantial clarity to the
alternative orientation. The three remaining build alternatives to be considered have not
been drawn at this time but will be further considered in the project report phase.
The need for track profile adjustments near Palm Avenue appear to make Alternatives 3 and
4 unfeasible based on the fact that an already steep track profile grade (2.25%) exists on the
BNSF Line. Understandably the existing steep grade and long reaching connection lengths
north and south along the BNSF Line make track profile adjustments impractical and
expensive.
9.0 Cost
The estimated construction cost for Alternative 1 as illustrated in the appendix is
approximately $15 million. This cost includes R/W, roadway, structures, and utility
relocation costs.
10.0
Purpose of Report
o
This report documents and presents the preliminary engineering done in conjunction with
the preparation of Concept General Plan for theJ'roject. This preliminary engineering
information will be utilized during preparation of the final project report, environmental
clearance under a Statutory Exemption (SE), final plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E)
that will be used to construct the Project.
PALMAVEEARL YTASKPSRJUL Y2OOaDRAFTV2.DOC
c
This report presents the following:
. A description of the Project area
. An estimate of Project impacts
. Figures identifying the regional Project area and the local Project
. Typical cross sections of the Palm A venue alignment
. Preliminary General Plan of one bridge location, including plan view drawings and
anticipated clearances at the BNSF ROWand related tracks
. Description of physical design limitation on potential alternatives
. Photographs of the general site location
c
o
PALMAVEEARl YT ASKPSRJUl Y200aORAFTV2.DOC
c
c
o
Appendix A
Vicinity Map and Location Map
PALMAVEEAAL YT ASKPSRJUl Y2008DRAFTV2.DOC
c
~
'.
..
""
""
<;;
..
! ~
~
'"
<,
'""
",
<;;
~
'"
<=
-a \,
'"
en
c
.~ @
'"
; ,
c
-0
u.-
Gl~
.-u
eo
1l..J
c
..
E
ii
v
. ~.,
.
~;.
,', "\; ."
~ "',- \.- . -~...... ~-"\..
'oj 'i ~ \t~: '.: 0,
l~ <..~ ~'\f
.....:.}t;_" c
,.;......
'J.. -~,-"-
'~,. -" I~<,
...... '"
T;,-'r__~:\,
a,;,:.. ..,'....
..~ '. .', ~.'
. , J. .
I" ",.~ "',
~ .......
.. .~-
o
,---~"~
" ""'-".
. ...,. ,..,."
:1;.
! Ql .
~ 5'" ~~
c:'~
~
~
q
~...
~
"
:g,
G
~
..
co
o
i
~
.
~
]~~ ~
.f j
E
.9
..
,..
@
.,
l
.
.,
t!,
o
l5
z
~
~
""
i
o '"
~ "E
:;:;
'"
-e
o
'~;,:-;';' "
~;-
~I..
Cl..
<(
:::E
~
Z
-
u
>
.J
.J
:E:
:&
N
:J:
(J
c
c
:S
",'"
~
~
'.-
P -t'"
#
,
~
clE::Cf
<:,01
8
"'"
,,~
- '"
E:
~~
/.>q,,<>-< 3:
't,
..
~
~; ~
t. ~'
:~' i~
t,-'....;
'.J .'
HlUgdLt.'
Dr
~
<t'!>"'~"t>A
'l)..J>
"....
"\ -0 . ,'~~
-'~ ""
.~ wE:
to\.\":",c,'l _4"
o~ ~
~C
~"& 1.
"\. ~ <.;.~~.
...",-~ ,., "I... ~
~, "''l ...
~ -'f<,
-f- ",}f., ~~
<:'h'i>tophe'!.l .b~ -t> fmf"'v'
....." ',o,..~
,~ ~ ~ 6~
;:. -,- ... '" ~ .~.." ~ q,e:%,
"''1' ,~ ~ \\~~O'I P ~ ~~
~.-..- '.f<:S' o~"- (.\ ~ <!',....
~'f: '4.CI iJ 'g,.- @ -,~"'f
.J ...;- "I.."...,..,..:L"'
b S> ....."0.6..
....'...'" -""<v
~.... -/
ijo ....." ,,} ....
-'>..::t'j'/b ~O ~ I",>} '$'-' ~.'
.... '\f.)"~J ~ ~ Il '"
.....,,:#-' "" ~
~"'" "'~ ~~' ./
tS "Q -+
,i' ~4,""o' ....
'S, "€ ~
"'''.)'~ ,;.!f'
~ "d'
~
,.,6
1'\")'00
.Jt\sc.e
(If'
'"'
"'~/"
"9
"1
'b,,_-$' It!
V"-"
,
.;..'~
~
v:'
<41'0
-0<>-
<...,;
"19%
" :)
'0.... } OIo,lrSgr
'UO"""
o
t)So/of.!"J
.'
! CD
l
p...
<(
::E
z
S
<(
9
..J
..J
i
~
N
::E:
o
c
c:
o
Appendix B
City of San Bernardino General Plan
PALMA VEEARl'iT ASKPSRJUl V2008DRAFTV2.DOC
HIGHWAYS
I
c
b-~
t
'!/.9'
17T1'I
S4'~
MAJOR DIVlDEDHlGHWAYS
t
, 19,.0' '. I-
i::1-S~~H'4Crt
MAJOR ItGHWAY
II.
tr- ..'e.. V
......~Ifo...
SECONDMY HIGlMlY
o
t
f-=..1..:..... :s ......J-u.91
L:..c: zl'--;- zz:::J-...!
COlWTY SEOOfOIlRY HIGHWAY
.. _011_ nIlU1l OP"'_
_nOlI. _ TO...... __....,..
II.
i:J-1d-...~SO'II~4-
SECONDMY HIGHWAY
"'..011..._ ___'-"011__
....._~~....... ..--
'Rl flllPaT_~_OPTW. _11111_
"'_~lflll_lII_"'.___
UWl'NOUTIIMN TMn'IC II AIIT'.-, aDJ
.,... &LLnIl
~ b ~-J
~ STAIIOARD ClIOII, acTIOII
I~~_A
. I PUll WtII
~'1
1i . N
,
-- _ A~U
I PUll VllWI
~l
tMS!
ITA_ CUT - C_I
!PUll VII.'
.l'}~
LOCAL STREET
HILLSIDE STREETS
t &
1 10' ~ <I
10' -t---40'------rIO'
~I""'" t--zo'-t-fO'-i ---I' t~ 21'
~ s'..J1-
COl.LETOR STREET unLITT PRIMARY HILLSIDE
,~ uti: IN __IIL1 tT~II1l,.-r COLLECTOR STREET
I_ AND _~'AL _....
t
~+~
CONTINUOUS STREET
"_ ANDIM.TIl'LI
~~AL _A40-_
- WITIllo-_ _.....
AND PULL wnmt _ALII "'ALL
.--
~~~
~'I'T~
NONOONTNIOUS STREET
IlAY"~ CIL'OI-uc,L_
lT1IU1IAND__ITMna
.... ".1:1 r II AWD HnIIIUL PEIIDTRWI
I'fITIIl II _D TMI_ 011_
"01 _ K IllDUCID 'Rl '-'IET.
ACCESS ROADVA'
CCNlIT10NAL
lUITD1II4 DlIIL~
...na__~..xl
(NO flIIRKING eont SIDES)
STANDARD STREET CONDITIONS
I. _ ___IIT_LL__ 'Rl T. IT_ ITMn
~_...... OIl,... _KT.
C IT Y Of' SAN eERNARDlNO - PU8L1c. I.IORK$ IlEPt
TYPICAL STREET seCTION
APPROVED
~..:~~;~~}
IlY ENGINEE.R
STANPARP
PLAN
100