HomeMy WebLinkAbout35-Planning Department
C" , OF SAN "RNARD. 10 - RI!QUL.. JT FOR COUNCIL AC, .'ON
Michael W. Loehr
from: Interim Director of Planning
Subject: Change of Zone No. 87-21
Dept: Planning
Date: October 10, 1988
Mayor and Council Meeting of
October 24, 1988, 2.00 p.m~
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
The Mayor and Council Approved of Change of Zone No. 87-21 on
June 6, 1988.
Recommended motion:
That further reading of said ordinance be waived and said ordinance
be laid over for final passage.
~/..A/I
Ignature
Michael W. Loehr
Contact person:
Michael W. Loehr
Phone:
384-5057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report with Ordinance
Ward:
3
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. DescriDtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
15-0262
Agenda Item No.
~3~
"
CIWl I OF SAN BIIRNARDl ~O - RIIQU. T FOR COUNCIL AC.~ ..ON
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Change of Zone No. 87-21
Mayor and Council Meeting of October 24, 1988
REQUEST
To change the land use zoning district from M-1A Limited
Light Industrial to C-M Commercial-Manufacturing.
BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting the above zone change for about
20.5 acres located on the north side of Commercial Drive,
south of the railroad right-of-way between Hunts Lane and
Waterman Avenue. The purpose of this zone change was to
allow the development of more commercial uses in this area.
Change of Zone No. 87-21
Council on June 6, 1988.
been adopted.
The land use designation on the Preferred Land Use Alterna-
tiveMap of the Interim Policy Document (IPD) is MU-1, south
pointe Mixed Use. This Mixed Use land use designation allows
the uses listed as permitted in the C-1, C-2, C-3, C-3A, C-4,
A-P, C-M, M-1 and M-1A zone districts. These districts are
the underlying zone districts consistent with the MU-1
designation. Therefore, Change of Zone No. 87-21, which is a
request for C-M Commercial-Manufacturing zone designation, is
consistent with the IPD.
was approved by the Mayor and
However, no final ordinance has
RECOMMENDATION
That the Mayor and Council adopt the attached ordinance.
Prepared by: John Montgomery, Principal Planner
For: Michael W. Loehr, Interim Director of Planning
Attachment A: Change of Zone No. 87-21 Ordinance
B: Map
mkf10/10/88
M&CCAGENDA:CZ8721
7').0264
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 ORDINANCE NO.
2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REZONING A CERTAIN
PARCEL OF LAND, AMENDING THE LAND USE ZONING MAP, WHICH IS
3 INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN SECTION 19.06.020 OF THE SAN
BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (PETITION NO. 87-21 LOCATED ON THE
4 NORTH SIDE OF COMMERCIAL DRIVE, SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY BETWEEN HUNTS LANE AND WATERMAN AVENUE), AND ADOPTING THE
5 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
6 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
7
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Chapter 19.06 of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code, the following described parcel of real property,
approximately 20.5 acres located on the north side of Commercial
Drive, south of the railroad right-of-way between Hunts Lane and
Waterman Avenue, is rezoned from M-lA, Limited Light Industrial,
to C-M, Commercial Manufacturing:
All that real property situated in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, described as follows:
Lot 1 of Tract No. 11414, in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, as per plat recorded in Book 151 of Maps,
Pages 41 through 44, inclusive, records of said
county.
(PETITION NO. 87-21)
SECTION 2.
The zoning map, which is incorporated by
reference in Section 19.06.020 of the San Bernardino Municipal
Code, is amended to reflect the change of zone set forth in this
ordinance.
SECTION 3.
The negative declaration for environmental
review, as adopted by the Environmental Review Committee,
attached hereto, marked Exhibit" A", and incorporated herein by
reference, is hereby approved and adopted.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly
HE/dys
October 12, 1988
1
9
10
11
12
1 ORDINANCE... REZONING A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND, AMENDING THE
LAND USE ZONING MAP, . (PETITION NO. 87-21 LOCATED ON THE
2 NORTH SIDE OF COMMERCIAL DRIVE, SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY BETWEEN HUNTS LANE AND WATERMAN AVENUE), AND ADOPTING THE
3 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
4
adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
5
6
Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held on the
7
day of
, 1988, by the following vote,
to wit:
8
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
13
14
City Clerk
15
The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this
day
16
of
, 1988.
17
18
19
20
EVLYN WILCOX, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
21
Approved as to form
an? Legal Content:
)
I ./
. /;1~'in-.', 7 Il~/, ~p~~,.,.?~., I"~.'
C~ty At'torn~y .. J. ~
22
23
/
24
25
26
27
28
HE/dys
October 12, 1988
2
EXHIBIT A
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
"'
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
~ ~
A. BACKGROUND
Application Number:
CA 87-21 I CUP 87-58
project Description: to change the zone from H1-A to C-H to
subdivide one parcel into ten and construct a 59,380 square foot
mini stora2e facility.
Location: north side of Commercial Drive between Hunts Lane and
Waterman Avenue, mini storage will be at the northeast corner of
Commercial and Hunts Lane.
Redevelopment Area, Enterprise Zone or other Special District: --
None
General Plan Designation:
General Industrial
Zoning Designation: "-lA, Limited Light Industrial
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
..
1. Earth Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more?
x
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15'
natural. grade?
c. Development within the'
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone? Seismic
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
x
x
REVISED 10'87
PAGE 1 OF 8
e. Soil erosion on or off the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
g. Development within an area
subject
to landslides, mudslides,
liquefaction or other similar
hazarCSS?
h. Other?
2. AIR RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area?
3.
Will
the
WATER RESOURCES:
proposal result in?
a. Changes. in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
b. Changes in the cours. or flow
of flood waters?
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change. in the quantity or
quality of. ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
Yes
No
Maybe
x
x
x
x
x
X'
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
REVISED 10/81
PAGE 2 OF 8
Yes
4.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
Could the
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
c. Other?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
s. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
c. Other?
6.
LAND USE:
result in:
Will the
proposal
...
a. A change .in the land use as
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Development within an Airport
District?
c. Development within -Greenbelt-
Zone A,B, or C?
d. Development within a high fire
hazard ,zone?
e. Other?
No
x
x
x
x
x
X
Maybe
X
X
x
X
X
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 3 OF 8
Yes
No
Maybe
7.
MAN-MADE HAj~~:
project:
Will
the
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or ~oxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
x
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
y
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
x
d. Other?
y
8. HOUSING: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
b. Other?
x
y
9. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An incr,ase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
x
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
x
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation .systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
x
x
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
x
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE ~ OF .
g.
h.
Yes
No
Maybe
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
Other?
of
x
X
10. PUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
X
a. Pire protection?
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
x
Police protection?
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
x
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
y
Medical aid?
x
Solid waste?
x
Other?
x
11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
1. Natural gas?
y
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
x
x
4. Sewer?
x
5. Other?
X
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
y
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
X
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 5 OF 8
12. AESTHETI~SI
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
13.
Could the
tY~TURAL RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
b.
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
c. Other?
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental
Quality Act~tates that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
Yes
No
x
X
X
X
X
X
Maybe
REVISEO 10/87 PAGE 6 OF 8
Yes
No
Maybe
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future. )
x
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects OQ human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
K
x
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
l.c-A geology report is requried due to the Alquist-Priolo
epeei.l et~Quea zaRe the site li~s in (San Jacinto)
l.g-A liquefaction report will be required.
6. d-d d'dll~C Lu d C-M ~ulle wuuld upen l;.he duur ~o cuuuuercial
t e land uses which contrar to the General Plan
eSlgna on 0 enera n ustr a .
9.a-an introduction of commercial uses in~o ~his AreA wnnld
increase traffic counts compared to that of industrial uses.
~alng tbat tb.; project is just R8rta Gf a ..41ua 48R.ity
residential Planned Development with an adopted EtR a
traffie st~ay/amendment to th6 EtR ~hould be ~~~~G~cd Lu
mitigate traffic impacts. \,
,. d-Cuuat,e:n;lal U8e8 couU1 1mpac~ nunt:s L.ane and wat:erman Avenue.
as well as the traffic atterns throu h "Sou ,.
anne eSl entla eve opment
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
D. DETERMINATI2B Change of Zone No. 87-21
On the basis of this initial evaluation,
r-A The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
L;::J environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation. measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
o
o
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
~ III It" IIJIt1 ~!1tL. l'bjl16JV t tJ # M I rf'i;fiC
Name and Title
gt/L ~ { /f,.w
Signature
Date:
I'. . 71/.a
//:f.,~cf./ /, . v:;>
...
REVISED 10/81
PAGE 8 OF 8
a @1
~ :
@
~
if y:::a
.
(0
r ~
00
n ~ i:
~ it
~ I.
I;
I!
0- U
cx: d il
:::E to
~ lYYI u
ct 1: -I
-I II
0- t) J ct
H
W 0-- I-
0 ~ ~tl 0\ z
z -:!! 3: l.LJ
ct ;.: 0
-r ~ 1.1 H
U ii-I .(/')
~ :JI l.LJ
W - 1- 0:::
i I:,;
z n.
0 i '01
N . ;~i
~
>
c:=
~
f?=a
~
IY1B
~
\\
~L
I-
z
...-\5
lex:
~ >
.,.
tt!
..~
-
-I I
~ I~ ~ ..
l ,ii:; i=:
_ ~- I!ht.
a~i~ill. h
till )fl,i'
J II;I~I 'Ill
hlll"~ II
"111):1::
d.,!I..,tn I
,.:.I ..Ah
QM8e eee.e
~E1-l-Zl4-
..
Ii
n! ':li ,0: 0
:00 _: I:':
I: i: 1.1: I: ~'I: i i: ~I
w !H; h~~ !i:l~ ..~i Ii:;; Iii!!. ·
i= !d~ Ilii litH i!ii ;hi! I;;lli I
1:1: :g 5hi~ dH tlai€ lnii~ ~1Il
! i I ,"
I. !
en
w
!~
iib~
.i~1
hI
Ish
! !
c 0
; i
hi
lih
II'
i!i
. ....
.10
,. I
I~
111
I ,~,
u it
.
I
\0
o
I
....
N(1)
I"\Cl
leU
:;~
....u
~ex:
-1(1)
W.o.,)
uco
o:::e
ct.....
(LX
(/')8
- a.
a::: a.
~ex:
(/')1"\
WlI'\
(/').
(/')0
ctN