HomeMy WebLinkAbout42-Planning Department
CIT. OF SAN BERNARDlh~ - REQUI!~r FOR COUNCIL AC\ .4N
From:
Michael W. Loehr,
Interim Director of Planning
Planning Director
Subject:
Appeal of Planning Commission's
Denial of Conditional Use Permit
No. 88-2
Mayor & Common
of November 7,
Council Meeting
1988 - 2:00 p.m.
~
Dept:
Date:
November 7, 1988
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Planning Commission voted 6-0 to deny Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2 to
establish a 64 unit motel on Highland Avenue. at their meeting of 10/4/88
Council approved a Change of Zone (No. 88-1) on May 16, 1988 from T,
Transitional to C-3, General Commercial
Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed; and, that the Mayor and Council
deny the appeal and deny Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2 (Planning Commission's
action) .
or
That the hearing be closed; that the Mayor and Council uphold the appeal and
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2 subject to the Findings of Fact,
Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the October 4,
1988 staff report; and, that the Mayor and Council adopt a Negative Declaration
for the Project. (Original staff recommendation.) /' '.'~ I
, /
rIAl ;1 , / ~/ j
I fI u/A"'/,;V "'--_ J-.._
, Signature
Michael W. Loehr
Supporting data attached:
Michael W. Loehr
Staff Report
Phone:
384-5057
7
Contact person:
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
~~
~1, \.. ~,
~. .~,
t~ 0. .~..",,,,
.~~ 77Z
Aaenda Item No. 7-'.
CIT~ OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEIt t FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Appeal of Planning commission's
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
Denial
of
Reauest
The applicant, Patrick Chiu & Associates, is appealing the
denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2 by the Planning
Commission. The applicant is requesting that the Mayor and
Council uphold the appeal and approve of Conditional Use
Permit No. 88-2 for the establishment of a 64 unit motel in
the CG - General Commercial land use designation.
Backqround
The site of the proposed 64 unit motel is a 1.03 acre site,
with 150 feet frontage on the south side of 23rd Street and
150 feet frontage on the north side of Highland Avenue, 100
feet west of Mountain view.
A Negative Declaration was recommended by the Environmental
Review Committee on March 24, 1988. The motel site plan was
recommended for approval by the Development Review Committee
on April 21, 1988.
Change of Zone Application No. 88-1 was submitted in
conjunction with the Conditional Use Permit application. The
northern half of the site, adjacent to 23rd Street, was zoned
T, Transitional and was approved for C-3, General Commercial
zoning by the Council on June 20, 1988.
The proposed Travelodge Motel was designed in a Spanish
architectural style and met all City Codes with regard to
parking, landscaping and circulation. The surrounding land
uses are commercial on the south, east and west, with
residential to the north along 23rd Street. No access was
proposed from 23rd Street.
The project was considered at the October 4, 1988 Planning
commission meeting, after being originally scheduled for July
19, 1988. At that earlier meeting the project was continued
so that the developer could meet with the surrounding
property owners. Such a meeting was held on September 27,
1988 in the Feldheym Library. The issues raised at that
meeting were:
Access to 23rd Street.
Crime in the area.
Distance from the freeway.
"'
To: Mayor & Common Council
Re: Appeal of Denial of CUP 88-2
November 7, 1988
Page 2
Maintenance of the facility.
Land use compatibility.
These same issues were raised at the Planning Commission
public hearing of October 4, 1988. A petition and protest
letters of about 200 persons were received. A side issue of
the City-Lites "teen night club" was raised. This "club"
caused a lot of concerns over the increase of crime incidents
in the neighborhood. The closure of this facility helped to
reduce the number of crime incidents and a concern was
expressed that the potential re-opening in combination with a
motel would reverse the present lower crime situation. The
police report reflected the history of the area and
recommended certain conditions of approval which were
incorporated into the Planning Department's recommendation of
conditional approval.
The issue of land use compatibility is largely a subjective
issue in this case. The neighbors, including some commercial
neighbors, do not want a motel to be in this area. The
developers feel by expanding into this local neighborhood,
they would be serving the needs of residents with visiting
family and friends, and would, more specifically, be serving
several local hospitals, advance business travel and mountain
traffic. Highway 18 is about eight blocks to the east of the
proposed motel site.
The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to deny the Conditional Use
Permit application on October 4, 1988.
options Available to the Mayor and Council
Uphold the appeal and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval,
Standard Conditions and Standard Requirements contained in
the October 4, 1988 staff report: and, adopt a negative
declaration for the project.
or
Deny the appeal and deny Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2.
...
To: Mayor & Common Council
Re: Appeal of Denial of CUP 88-2
November 7, 1988
Page 3
Recommendation
The staff's recommendation is for conditional approval. The
Planning Commission's decision was 6-0 for denial, due to the
neighborhood' strong concerns of inappropriate land use at
this particular site.
Prepared by: John Montgomery, AICP
Principal Planner
Prepared for: Michael W. Loehr,
Interim Director of Planning
Attachments:
"A" Letter of Appeal
"B" statement of Official Planning Commission
Action
"C" Protest Letters
"0" October 4, 1988, Staff Report
JM:cms
M&CC.cup882denial
10/24/88
...
ATTACHMENT "A"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
October 18, 1988
Ms. Vivian Stevens
Planning Department
City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
101
~j
~ r~ ;~: ~; ..: ! ~~ ~.'~.'~l
lS ; ~J L:: .' ... ~.; i
;..__0'
OCT 1 D i98a
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT 88-2
APPEAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
ClTY PlP};i~:;';2 :~;'7;".:';aH
~;;~.~ :~:'~:::~~;'.:>~' ';'l, C',~
Dear Ms. Stevens:
This letter is accompanied with a check in the amount of $75 and
together are submitted in conformance with your requirements for
an appeal filed on an action taken by the Planning Commission. In
particular, the Planning Commission denied the application for
Conditional Use Permit 88-2 for the construction and operation of
a Travelodge Motel facility to be located at 220 W. Highland
Avenue.
The reasons for the appeal are as follows:
1. The Planning Commission closed the public hearir.g before the
applicant had the opportunity to respond to issues raised by
the City Attorney.
2. Testimony offered to and received by the Planning Commission
from local residents on matters related to prostitution,
drugs, ands crime was vague, undocumented and is not sup-
pcrted by information available from the Police Department.
Local residents indicate that the neighborhood has the worst
crime in the City. However, the San Bernardino Police
Department testified that this area does not have "below
average" incidents of crime.
3. The staff report to the Planning Commission documented all
of the relevant facts surrounding the developmenc of the
site, the characteristics of the neighborhood, traffic con-
ditions and other issues. The recommendation to the Planning
Commission from staff was to approve the request because the
facts supporting the necessary findings for the issuance ot
a Conditional Use Permit are evident and included in the
record.
4. In early 1988, the City of San Bernardino approved Change of
Zone 88-1 which provided the necessary zoning for the
proposed motel use. At the time of the zone change the ap-
plicant clearly stated the purpose of the zone change was
for the motel project. This was presented at public hearings
before the Planning Commission and the City Council - and
approved.
1867 Fern Hollow Drive. Diamond Bar. CA 91765
5. At the Planning Commission hearing, the Police Department
indicated that they did not initially realize that the
proposed motel would be a national name brand facility.
However, when the Police Department learned that the
facility will be a Travelodge, the representative suggested
that the Police Department felt more comfortable with the
use.
6. The Planning Commission considered the potential opening of
a "teen night club" as a negative factor that, coupled with
a motel, would breed crime. It is my contention that the
motel will be a secured facility properly managed well
within the provisions of the law. Our proposal should not be
denied on the basis of another speculative use.
In summary: the site is properly zoned for a motel; the neigh-
borhood is subject to high volume commercial traffic; the
development proposal complies with every aspect of the zoning and
development code; vehicular and pedestrian access to 23rd Street
is shown on the plans to be precluded and if approved will be
built accordingly; the site is not adequate for more commercial
retail businesses as evidenced by the many vacant (and
deteriorating) storefronts now located in the neighborhood.
The proposed project represents a substantial new investment in a
commercial area that is in very obvious need of improvements. The
Travelodge Motel will provide a secure facility offering needed
motel rooms for the traveling public and the community. We
respectfully request the City Council's favorable response to our
appeal of the Planning Commission's action.
Sincerely,
~ITY DZVELOPMENT CONSUL~ING SERVICES
Ga~~~~
attachmen~ Appeal fee of $75.00
"TT AClW'~NT "B "
City of San Bernardino
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
PROJECT
Number:
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
Applicant:
Patrick Chiu
ACTION
Meeting Date: October 4, 1988
Approved Adoption of Negative Declaration and
Request Subject to the following Findings of
Fact and Conditions and Standard Requirements
(Attachment A).
x
Denied.
Other.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposed use conforms to the objectives of the
Interim Policy Document adopted by the Mayor and Common
Council on May 23, 1988, amended on June 6, 1988, and
approved by the state Office of Planning and Research on
June 9, 1988 in that the document and map designate this
area for General Commercial uses which include motels.
2. The proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which it is to be located in that it is not compatible
with the existing commercial development in the immed-
iate vicinity primarily the adult movie arcade and a bar
which has .been approved for reopening, and impacts to
adjacent residential uses due to the probability of
increased criminal activity.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use are
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed
use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area
nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare in
that the site can accommodate the proposed motel and
satisfy all requirements for setbacks, landscaping,
parking and access.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways
designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area,
City of San Bernardino
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
Page 2
and adequate on-site parking is provided in that the 24
foot driveway provides access to Highland Avenue which
is a major arterial with signals at both Mountain View
and Sierra Way and 66 parking spaces are required and
provided.
5. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed will be detrimental to the peace,
health and safety and general welfare of the citizens of
the city of San Bernardino in that there is a potential
for cumulative negative affects to the adjacent residen-
tial uses relative to increase in crime, the nature of
the business (a motel) and the lengthy distance from a
freeway coupled with the possible reopening of a bar
approximately four parcels to the west.
VOTE
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
Brown, Corona, Lindseth, Nierman, Sharp, Stone
None
None
Cole, Gomez, Lopez
I, hereby, certify that this Statement of Official Action
accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning
Commission of the City of San Bernardino.
th1JJ.A~AL
Signature
ID / 1'2 I f :(
Date
Michael W. Lowhr, Interim Director of Planning
Name and Title
/mkf
PCAGENDA:
PCACTION
r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT"
SUMMARY
\...
AGENDA ITEM _ 9
HEARING DATE 10/4/88__
WARD 7 ~
&&J
(/)
<(
(,)
Conditional Use Permit 88A-2
APPLICANT: Patrick Chiu & Associates
13523 Francisquito Ave.#B
Baldwin Park, CA
OWNER: Great Western Development
15270 Los Altos Drive
Hacienda Heights, CA 9174
; The applicant requests approval under authority of Code
&&J Section 19.28.020(C)15 of a Conditional Use Permit to
5 establish a 64 unit motel in the C-3, General Commercial
1&1 District.
a:
......
c:r
&&J Subject Site is a 1.03 parcel on the north side of Highland
~ AVenue, the south side of 23rd Street, approximately 100 feet
west of Mt. View.
EXISTING IPD
PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION
Subject Rest. & Pkng. Lot C-3 CG
North Apts./Sngle.Fam. R-3 RS
South Bank C-3 CG
East Comm./Pkng. Lot C-3 CG
West Bank/Pkng. Lot C-3 CG
GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC DVES FLOOD HAZARD DVES OZONE A C SEWE.S ElYES )
HAZARD ZONE DNa ZONE X! NO OZONE B DNa
HIGH FIRE DYES AIRPORT NOISE I DYES REDEVELOPMENT fiVES
HAZARD ZONE 6aNo CRASH ZONE GO NO PROJECT AREA ONO
..J o NOT D POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z !XI APPROVAL
;! APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - !XI
Z(I) MEASURES NO E.!.R. ~ CONDITIONS
UJ.C!) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO ILO 0
2Z I&.Z DENIAL
z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ~
00 WITH MITIGATING ~2 0 CONTINUANCE
a:Z MEASURES 02 TO
>ii: ikNo 0
z o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ()
&&.I SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.R. C. ~
EFFE CTS MINUTES G:
NOV. I." ItIV.ltD .lULY ....
SKY
ATTACHMENT "c"
Paull. Crapo
Senior Master Agent
Resistered Representative
256 W. Hiahland Ave., Ste. 4
P.O. Box 2056
San Bernardino, CA 92406
714-886-4726
,..- f" ..~
. . o' . o ' 0'
, 1 I I.
i i --: \ , I .1 I.
i I
. :
. . . .
SEP 27
.(t) Cc
, " 11r:-
' t.
~ I' ~
, /:..
\-..'"
THEEQw~>>!c~
1988
September 21, 1988
f'-:-".
...,.. ,_' ,,: ~~:J;" ..~.~;..:1...4~::tIT
:2 I~.:J :: ~~~'~;1mr\WA !i
~ ~I
~I
. -
wl1
Ot
-
Councilman Michael Maudsley
City Hall
300 No. D Street
San Bernardino, CA
Re:
Conditional Use Permit 88-2
Property Location - 226 W. Highland Ave.
San Bernardino, Cl
Dear Councilman Maudsley:
Upon returning from a summer vacation I have been confronted by my
neighbors in the proposed out of town developer who is asking for
approval to build a 64-unit',. motel on this site between Arrowhead and
Mt. View. I am asking you to oppose this proposed motel unit in view
of what could happen to this thriving business area, such as vice,
narcotics and prostitution. Certainly it is not a desirable area for
a motel.
We have maintained our offices in the Highland Ave. area, primarily on
Highland Ave. in the present location for some 41 years. I have been
very pleased with the foresight in allowing permits along Highland Ave.
such as the developments in recent years on the NW corner of Sepulveda
and Highland Ave., the SE corner of D street and Highland Ave., the
SW corner of E Street and Highland Ave., as well as numerous other
stores and facilities who have improved their frontal property.
Having been the original partner with the TraveLodge Corporation in
developing the two downtown TraveLodges and operating them through the
50's and 60's, I know what goes on in the motel business and how hard
it 1s to maintain a respectable and desirable clientele. With thi' and
the above information, and knowing that 90~ of the people in a mile
radius of this area are opposed to this motel, I would ask that you be
very strongly opposed to it.
Sincerely yours,
(t&!l~
~ReplesencatM
THE EQUITABlE Uff ASWRANCE 5(X]m
Of THE UNITED STATES
1285 Averued the Americas
NewYoric. N.Y. 10019
Individwl ~nd Group Life ~nd HeaIlh
Insurance ~ Annuities
Agent
EQUITABlE VAItIAIIlf Uff INSURANCE
COMPANY (EVlJCO)-
1285 Awnue d the Americas
NewYoric. N.Y. 10019
Variable I.ife Insurance, life Account
~ Single Premium Delened Annuities
Registered Rep.""""Glive
EQUICO SECURITIES, INC.-
looWest52ndSl., NewYoric. N.Y. 10019
A Securities 8toked[)eaIer, distribulord
MuluaI Funds ~ Olher Securities
. A wblidiAry 01 TIw EquitAble
At\..achment "B"
JACK JR. WIDMEYEJR
:::
INSURANCE
-REAL ESTATE DIVISION
13a1 EAST HIGHLAND AVENUE
SAN BERNARDINO. CA .a.o.
PHONE 71.-..&-17.'
Ms. Myra E. Elder
2350 N. Arrowhead Ave.
San Bernardino. Ca. 92405
September 2. 1988
San Bernardino Planning Department
Ms. Vivian Stevens
300 North 'D' Street
San Bernardino. Ca. 92418
iDJ
I ,~ ....
.' I
\. ~ I . ~
j'i= i ~ f"2 r'
l~.! ".-
L..;
;.... "',
~: FP o:~ 1388
Re: 64 unit motel - proposed. Highland Ave.
c.~p B8-do I ~ 51 9/iI/l(
Dear Ms. Stevens.
I am opposed to the development of subject property for the following reasons:
1) Traffic would increase at intersection of Highland and Arrowhead Avenues.
This corner is already extremly dangerous (see attached article from San
Bernardino Sun)
2) I am fearful of the type of persons that a motel may attract to our neigh-
borhood. We have an ongoing problem with prowlers. burglaries. vandalism,
graffiti and murders within a few blocks of the site and feel that these
incidents may increase if transients are encouraged. Many of the area
residents are senior citizens and some are confined to wheelchairs. Much
of their shopping and recreation is limited to the immediate area of
this proposed project. Their saiety would be threatened if crime increases.
3) Property values would decline dramatic1y if "undesirables" patronized the
motel. I have spent a great deal of time driving by motels in this city.
With few exceptions. the surrounding neighborhoods have become decayed and
pitiful. Surely we have enough blight already in our community I
I am a lifetime resident of this area and was raised only a few blocks from
my current residence. I own a home on Arrowhead Ave. and have two rental properties.
all of which are maintained in excellent condition. All are only a few hundred
feet from the site in question. consequently both my safety and income would be
threatened if the area suffered from negative impact.
During the last few months, I have spoken with Seargent Tull and Detective
Cartony of San Bernardino Police Department Vice and Narcotics. as well as Irma
Castellanos and Dan Hernandez with San Bernardino Crime Prevention Program. They
were not able to furnish printed statistics or data that was releavent, but all
agreea~th my concerns - and all agreed that they would not want this project near
their homes, due to the potential increase in traffic and crime.
~~:t'Ul~ :u~
V4'~T E~r
~~~~Bank
Bank Properties
I.~ I; Bou~hlon Drive. Bakersfield. (Jlif"r:~ l'.l~5\'S · i' (I Box ;';00. Bakersfield. California q.~~H~
~O;-~hl-4i;.;
July 20, 1988
Mr. Michael Laehr
City Of San Bernardino
Planning Department
Planning Director
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, California 92418
Dear Mr. Laehr: RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-2
HEARING DATE: 7/19/88 AT 7:00 P.M.
American National Bank at 296 West Highland, San Bernardino, 92405, was not included
in the notification of the above referenced hearing.
I am requesting on the behalf of American National Bank additional information
regarding the conditional use permit app1icationt
It is our understanding that the use permit is for a 64 unit motel to be located
at 220-226 Highland Avenue. It would be most helpful to know if the motel will
be one of a chain or privately owned.
Please forward to:
American National Bank
Peggy Wilson
Bank Property Management
P.O. Box 85500
Bakersfield, California 93380-5500
Sincerely,
/'J 1~7 , . .'
//-'1 ::?-'t/)\ /~' --:::::~.:}./h-.-/
'~I ' f l
Peggy W'i 1 son
Property Manager
PW:mr
cc: American National Bank
Gloria Forget-Branch Manager
296 Highland Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92405
~r-;::::\
I~ ~ '\ "". \ .. .~.; ,
..~
~: :'~
-....
\ ~-', '.
\:. '
.-~
'\ .:,'~'~ ~)
.' '\
JU-
I" .
. .'
IRA'r ~IGr!T I~.
INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL BUREAU
278.WEST HIGHlAND AVENUE. SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92405
Telephone (714) 882.3312
June 15, 1933
Fla~.ir~ Dept. Director
Cit~. f.al1
:300 No. D ST.
San Berna~'dino, CA 92401
OJ ...., (~
.;~ i ..*
-- .....
~ ! ~.
j:"'\
. j. ,
-- :_.J
J !..':!., ~ ,')
1(:'~ '":'
; ~~ oJ "..
r,....
"l. .
,.. . . . ,. .,~.' A - ..
.l'l...."tenu1.on I'.;T. ,:.J.C!l!~e.:.. ~0e~"T
,. .
t." , ~-.~ .
. iT
2.e: Conditianel tise Penit 28-2 ;.'or 64 Unit Motel
Gentla::Jen:
:L most Gt!"o~lY LU'!<e ~ha~ vou refuse above subject ':-er'!lit.
7:1::2 :):'Q~osa 1 ~~'::' :~ : 'C'~,~:' I; t :11i3 !.ocetion border:: up.:m t~e lud:.c!"ous.
:r~~ iactions ~il: inc!"easc.
It :"5 !lot within the tour-cari,:::> of necessity.
It i~ not ~cnd~~ive to th~ n3iG~borhood.
It is not a fair proposition tc either the r95identi~1 ;n' business property
o\'mel's.
It will O;:l1.~. 3erve to Gepr~ciate property values.
9usir..e.5s p!"ope::-ty renter:J .,.d11 seek other locations thus furtr..er 19terior3-
tion of a neig~b0r~lood already beset ~ith fading attr~:tiven~ss.
Respectfully yours,
~~~-_..
R' C .,.~
. . !\L:lo:,:l..
propert? owner
278 '.'I. HighlanJ Ave.
. "': 4.
San Bernardino Office
245 West Highland Avenue
San Bernardino. California 92405.4063
(714) 883-8691 Savings
(714) 883-8695 Loans
COAST
'SAVINGS
AND LOAN
July 14;' 1988,
Planning Department
San Ber.nardlno City Hall ..
300 North "011 Street
San Bernardino, California 92418
Planning Director
RE: CUP 88-2
Michael Loehr
As the manager of the San Bernardino office of Coast Savings and Loan I
must voice my objections to the proposal to permit a 64 unit motel to be
built on the north side of Highland Avenue, (directly accross from my
office), discribed as 220-226 Highland.
, A~ a business person I see no reason for a motel in this area. All it
wili do is attract undesirables and cause more traffic problems.
..
S:incerely,
'.' . ~ .
"~':~\ \, '--,"0,~
~..... - -
." .,..-....,'~..."
. -..c"" "
Helene Lare
BraneR Vi,ce President and' ~n~ger'.
. ;"
- p ~. -:
.- ~f7
.-
.....Gt
;i~.-.
. ! ,! '
! " /
"w.<
:_i:.. ~
If : I
'.I ~...~. ..'
~ -..., ...... ("'I
,~':.'J
Ci ;','
:;.j7
<rt,.". .. ..
, ,'"
. i '.:1 L/~
Your Savings Federally Insured to $100,000
2.:J2 W. 25th
~an Bernardino, CA 92405
September 6, 1988
.t'lanning Cornr::ission
vity ~lanning ~epartm~nt
~oo N. J.) ute
~an 6ernardino, vA 92401
uommission members:
As a long-tim~ homo-owner and resident of th~ rvsiden~ial
noighborhood near the proposed motel si ~o on __ighland avenue,
~ wish to r~inforco my ~trong oppo~ition as ~xplain~d in my
phone call.
~his resid~ntial neighborhood i~ no~ an appropriate location
for a mo~.:;l. ~usiness pt:opl... and ~o1ll'i....li::S would no~ find i~
conveniont, ~o tho typ~ of p~opld i~ would attract are no~ th~
typ... Wt;;; wan~ in om' ar~a.
~ want to be ablo to continutI taking care of my busin...:.o:::J and
shopping ne~d::s on ~ighl~~d with9ut added appreht;;;n~ion.
~ours very t~~ly,
-:~/-eZ4/rfZV?~~ z!tiY~
France~ ~ane ..itofel
~ITY OF SAN -,ER~~AR~OI~bu - t"'EMORANDUlV
To Planning Commission
.Jubject Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
From Planning Department
D~e October 4, 1988
Approved Agenda Item #: 9
Date
APPLICANT
Patrick Chiu & Associates
13523 Francisquito Avenue #B
Baldwin Park, CA
OWNER
Great Western Development
15270 Los Altos Drive
Hacienda Heights, CA 91745
REQUEST
The request is for approval of a Conditional Use Permit under
authority of Section 19.28.020(C)15 of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code to establish a 64 unit motel in the C-3,
General Commercial Zoning District.
LOCATION
The subject site is a 45,000 square foot rectangularly-shaped
parcel, with 150 feet frontage on both 23rd Street and
Highland Avenue, 100 feet west of Mountain View.
BACKGROUND
The hearing on this application was originally scheduled for
July 19, 1988. It has been continued to give the applicant
time to meet with the surrounding property owners who have
objected to the motel. That meeting was held Tuesday,
September 27, 1988 in the Feldheym Library.
ANALYSIS
Nine people attended the meeting held in the main library.
The issues they raised were:
1. Access to 23rd Street.
2. Crime in the area.
3. Distance from the freeway.
. '
"- ',1
( TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
RE: CUP #88-2
PAGE 2
4. Maintenance of facility.
5. Future of the area.
The site plans were on display and fully explained to the
residents attending the meeting. The motel will have no
access to 23rd Street. The rear of the building facing 23rd
Street is well-lit and landscaped. The building has been
designed to have no windows opening onto 23rd Street.
However, the elevations show an architectural treatment to
the wall.
The citizens were very concerned that the police report said
the area was a low crime area. One resident's home insurance
was cancelled because of the number of burglaries in the
neighborhood. The police report based the crime rate on a
comparison of criminal activity city-wide.
The area does have a relatively low rate of crime. It has
the second lowest rate for burglaries in the City. The crime
rate has fallen in the last several years with the Closing of
a neighborhood bar and a teen dance studio. Many problems
with nuisance crimes were mentioned. For example, Coast
savings Bank was forced to close off an outdoor access
because vagrants used the area for sleeping and as a urinal.
Trash bins in the entire area are used for bedrooms.
The applicant pointed out that those activities occur without
a motel. These problems exist in many areas. The additional
lighting and increased activity resulting from the new motel
in the area will make the area less appealing to vagrants.
Close cooperation with the local police will help prevent
these problems from growing
The project is conditioned to keep the premises clean and
neat. An additional condition of approval will be added
requiring the owner to remove any graffiti immediately should
graffiti displays occur.
The citizens wanted to know who would be using the motel as
it is far from the freeway. The applicant stated that Travel
Lodge is expanding its market into the local neighborhoods to
serve the needs of residents with visiting family and
friends. The motel would be the first motel for people going
to several local hospitals from the freeway. Business travel
with advance bookings and mountain traffic are also major
markets.
TO: pLANNING COMMISSION
RE: CUP t88-2
PAGE 3
The neighbors were concerned that in a few years the upkeep
of the motel would go downhill and create the same type of
problems the city has in the downtown area.
Maintenance of the Motel is included in the conditions of
approval. The owner is required to keep the exterior and
interior of the building clean and in good repair at all
times. The police report was discussed concerning the
identification required of guests and the fact that no
hourly, weekly or monthly rentals would be allowed. These
conditions were added by the police to prevent the motel from
being used for other purposes. The residents were told that
these requirements give the City the authority to review the
Conditional Use Permit should it not be operated in
accordance with the conditions of approval.
CONCLUSION
The questions raised by the residents are the concerns
addressed by the police in their staff report and in the
Planning Staff Report. The plans reflect that there is no
access to 23rd Street. The conditions of approval address
the issues of crime and maintenance of the facility. To help
prevent misuse of the rooms the police added the requirement
for identification of all guests.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission
hearing and evaluate the project based on
and information contained in the staff
recommends that the Planning Commission:
hold the public
the public input
report. Staff
1. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2; and
2. Adopt the Negative Declaration.
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
RE: CUP '88-2
PAGE 4
Respectfully submitted,
MICHAEL W. LOEHR
Interim Director of Planning
~~'V/I'~ g~~
Vivian stevens ~
Planner II
VS : ems
Attachment "A" - staff Report
Attachment "B" - Neighbor'S Letter
pca.cup8820
9/29/88
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM _ 9
HEARING DATE 10/4/88__
WARD 7
~
~ Conditional Use Permit 88A-2
U
AP~I~NT: Patrick Chiu & Associates
13523 Francisquito Ave.#B
Baldwin Park, CA
OWNER: Great Western Development
15270 Los Altos Drive
Hacienda Heights, CA 9174
tn
~
~
o
&1.1
a:
'"
c:r
I&J
a:
ex
The applicant requests approval under authority of Code
Section 19.28.020(C)15 of a Conditional Use Permit to
establish a 64 unit motel in the C-3, General Commercial
District.
Subject Site is a 1.03 parcel on the north side of Highland
AVenue, the south side of 23rd Street, approximately 100 feet
west of Mt. View.
EXISTING IPD
PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION
Subject Rest. & Pkng. Lot C-3 CG
North Apts./Sng1e.Fam. R-3 RS
South Bank C-3 CG
East Comm./Pkng. Lot C-3 CG
West Bank/Pkng. Lot C-3 CG
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DVES FLOOD HAZARD DVES o ZONE A ( eVES )
HAZARD ZONE ONo ZONE DNO OZONE B SEWERS DNO
HIGH FIRE DVES AIRPORT NOISE / OVES REDEVELOPMENT fiVES
HAZARD ZONE ~O CRASH ZONE GaNO PROJECT AREA ONO
-' o NOT D POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z IX! APPROVAL
~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - [XJ
ZU) MEASURES NO E.I.R. ti CONDITIONS
""<:) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO ILO 0
2Z II..ffi DENIAL
z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
00 j!:E
a:z WITH MITIGATING 0 CONTINUANCE TO
MEASURES U):E
S;i&: 6EkNo 0
z o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS U
"" SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.R. C. ""
EFFE CTS MINUTES a:
NOV. I'" REVIlED JULY I'.'
SICY
(
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE cUP 88-2
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM _ 9
HEARING DA~ _l._OL~/88
PAGE 2
,
"""III
1. REOUEST
The applicant request~ approval of
Permit under authority of Section
establish a 64 unit motel in the C-3,
District.
a Conditional Use
19.28.020(C)15 to
General Commercial
2. ~ATION
The subject site
parcel, with 150
Street and 150
Highland Avenue,
Attachment "J".
is a 1.03 acre rectangularly-shaped
feet frontage on the south side of 23rd
feet frontage on the north side of
100 feet w~st of Mountain View. See
3 . z.mRIJ;.1 ~ ~J.._ Cm'-F~ _~~p_ _<i~t~f..RPr.L _ Pl~N _C.PJifQ RMA NCE
Approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit is
consistent with the Municipal Code as shown in
Attachment "A". It is aJso consistent with t~e Jnt~15~,
Pol i cy Docunl~J'lt ac1ortec1 by the Mo~ or ano ("OTl:nlon COl1r.c ~ J
on May 23, 1988, and amended on June 6, 1988, and
approved by the State Office of Planning and Research on
June 9, 1988. See Attachment "A", Municipal Code &
General Plan Conformance.
4 . ~_E-.O.~_ .sTATUS
An InitiaJ Study was prepared by staff and preseJ'lted to
the EJ'lvironrl1ental Review Conlfldttee at the !-Tarch 24, 19~8
me~ting. A negative declaration was recommended. The
initial study was made available for public review and
comment from March 31, 1988 to April 13, 1988. No
comments .were received. See Attachment "B", Initial
Study.
5. BAC1<GROQ~P
A Change (If
conjunction
Originally,
adjacent to
7.0J'l~ (CZ e8-1) Apf-1icat.ioJ'l wcf: f'I:t-.r.:itt€'o iJ'l
witb t.his Ce.nditIonaJ USf' Ferndt.
the northern half of the site, that which is
23rd Street, was zoned T, Transitional. The
""
(
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 88-2
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM__ 9 __
HEARING DATE _lP...L 4 /88
PAGE 3
,.
Planning Commission approved the Change of Zone on April
19, 1988. On May 16, 1988, the Mayor and Common Coun~;J
copt j nued t h~' Change of Zone Appl icf.l t:i (in for tl"l i r tl'
days, requesting infoIOlcltion on tbe n,ot"E.J ownen:; CirIC~
crime stati~tjcs for the area. The police and staff
report were prepared and submitted to the Council. See
Attachment "F", Police Report. After review of the
additional information, the Council approved the Change
of Zone on June 20, 1988. The motel site plan wa~
recon.menc1ed for approvCl.l b~ the Development Rev i ew
Conmd ttee on Apr il 21, ] 988. The ~edeveJ opment Agency
has indicated approval of the proposed elevations.
6. ANALYSIS
1AA._~ro~osal
The proposed 64 unit motel will have Spanish
architecture. The south elevation fronting Highland
Aventie features a covered driveway into the complex. Tt~
plans depj('t a blljJdipg ~jtt, it t5Je J:(}(.f ,<nd stuccCo
wallR trimmed with wood and tile. The two story motEl
will have four, two room suites. The Police Department
has conditioned its approval on quality construction
designed to enhance the neighborhood. See Attachment
"H", Floor Plans.
The north elevation fronts 23rd Street. The plClns Sh0~
tl'iat tl"l€' b1l5JdjpS; \oilJ] h~. c1esisnE'c1 f(; I'tE.-sent c;n
blchjte~tDraJ}l interesting face to this residential
street. This rear wall of the motel will have window~
op the second floor but there is no outlet onto 23rd
Street. See Attachment "G", Elevations.
~P_qE;. R~.qlJ'irS!ments
The project meets all City Codes w~th Iesard to parkjp~;
::and~capin9, Clnd cir('lIJation. ThE'If' ,'iff- F.6 f'crlc.ir'<J
8pa~e~ p~opo~ed. There is 2,500 ~quatP feet of
landscaping and a twenty-four foot dIj~P Clisle within
the courtyard.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 88-2
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM _ ".2
HEARING DATE 1.9.14/88
PAGE 4
,.
""l1lI
The proposed motel is located in the Uptown
Redevelopment Project Area. The proposal meets the
design standards for that area's plan. The plans show a
10 foot lanoscaped setback on both 23rd Street and
Highland Av<-mue. J'ngress and eglf:'s~: cue. I'l(;,..ideo t.y a
74 f00t C1jlVE'\O''''1 cr, f:igh:<.fnc1 ~vf:I"ll)f'. 'Jr,€' inter'io;:.
C'onfigeration and twenty-four foot drive aisle allow
adequate circulation for fire equipment and refuse
trucks. The building will be equipped with sprinklers
and there is a fire hydrant located in the parking lot.
See Attachment "I", Site Plans.
Con'~atiQi)J_~
The land uses slJrlollnc1:;ng tt,e Pl(JpOf'e(~ III()t(..~ ()1('
C'(lntnlerci,d (In thp f;Olltt., ec:~t c.n(1 \.f'~:1. rcSnkr. i r f.
located to the east and across Highland to the south of
the proposed site. A commercial strip fronts Highland
to the east of the proposal. The motel land use will
continue the existing commercial land uses along
Highland Avenue.
The exist ing land use aJ ong 23rd Street :; f; a nd). of
rrulti-family residential, sjng]e-f~miJy resjdentj~l; and
parkin~ lots. Impact to the IeRid~rtial area 58
minimized by the solid real wall of the motel behind ten
feet of landscaping, including trees, along 23rd Street.
Traffic
Traffic was addressed in the initial study. Motel
tlilffic commonJy does not irupact peak hour traffic. The
City Engineering Department reports that Highland Avenue
:'f; c1ef5c:.rH1 i (I C(jl1."1 aI"lj' ac1dHjc,nal tlC1ffic the rilot:eJ
~:('"Jt Sf'n(::.:,~(. t-::'(; r.('~, I;.;,f("(o ('(Irt.i.(;~f' \1(lU]C te nE:'edE~d
a~ traffic control signals are already in rJ~ce at th~
intersections of Highland and Mt. View and Highland and
Arrowhead.
~9J Lee Repor t
The attached police
j~ located in a
pr~vent potentibJ
f(I~JcwJI'l~;
report gtates that the proposed site
very low crime area. In order to
pl (,bJ E?'Il:~; r H.e r oJ :: Cf' j f'llld i (~ tl.,(-
""
~
(
.{
I
9
AGENDA ITEM _ - - _
HEARING DATE _ .1014/..a.L
PAGE 5
,
'. Ql1a] ity COI'lstlucf Jon fl1o.tetials be lJ~ed to enhance
the neighborhooo.
2. Adequate ~ighting be provided on the north side of
the complex.
3. No access from 23rd Street.
4. Proper records be kept of tenants including drivers
license and vehicle license plate numbers.
5. No hourly, weekly or monthly rentals.
(,. The grollnc1s, park ~.I'l9 lot, aI'ld thE- ; ntet i or Clrd
e}(teriot elf ti,e btdlding be well n1cdnl.ajned.
'rhE'se cOl"1oitJoI'ls bave beeI'l Cldded a~~ C(lJ~oitiofls of
Approval. S~e Attachment "F".
7 . COM!o'ENTlLHf:r;,;: J VED
All City Departments reviewed the applicatiofl during the
Development Review process. Their Standard Requirements
and Conditjofls are attached.
8. CONCLUS_:tQ.N
The proposed 64 unit motel is compatible with the area
Qrl(~ t~e ('-3; C:f~I'le!:Cl.J COIIIIllelcial zonirc;. TtJe proro~aJ
I..€f>tr. (;jJ= (';t~ ('(.de~ fOl c1e\,'f,)opl1.ent if\chleing parking,
landscaping, circulation and traffic. The Police
Department has conditioned approval of the motel to
insure the proposal will not impact the nearby
residential area.
9. RF.COMME~Q~~~Q~
It is recommended that the Planing ('omIDis~ior:
J~ "Il[JIC'J(- t-t:e:' ~~E~~t1t3~€~ r:f;\~JCiloti.on; Ctl'c1
1-ppCH- ('"(II1e~it.;(Jrl,,~ FH" Ffl'nl;t. No. 8~;-2 subj€.ct tel
the folJowing Findings of Fact (AftClchment "E");
and ConditioI'ls of Approval and Standard Conditions
(Attachment "en) , and Standard Requirements
(attachment "0").
""
~
(
AGENDA ITEM _.2 _
HEARING OATE -10/4/~8_
PAGE --0
Respectfully submitted
MICHAEL W. LOEHR
Interim Director of Planning
~~
Vivian Stevens
Planner TT
VS:cms
Attachwent "~" - ~unicjp&J Co~~ & GpneraJ PJap COnfO[IDa~Cf
Attachment "B" - FindingF of Fact
AttacI-:nlE.!nt "e" - Cor.c1it:.oru:: of ApptovaJ. f. Standard Condit~.oPs
Attachment "D" - Standard Requirements
Attachment "E" - Initial Study
Attachment "F" - Police Report
Attachment "G" - Elevations
~ttachment "H" - Interior Elevations
Attachment "I" - Site ~ap
Attachment "J" - Location Map
doc.pcagenda.
cup88:?O
7/12/88
"'-
~
Attachment "},
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 88-2
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM _.~ _
HEARING DATE _10/4/88
PAGE 7
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Category Project Municipal Code IPD
Permitted Motel CUP Required Yes, CUP required
Use
Height 28 feet 45 feet Yes, defer to
Municipal Code
Setbacks 10 feet 5 feet Yes, defer to
(Front) Municipal Code
Lot Size/ ISO' X 300' No Minimum Defer to Muni Code
Dimensions
Lot Coverage 1.03 acres No Maximum Defer to Muni Code
39%
Parking 66 66 Defer to Muni Code
\...
~
Attachment "i.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 88-2
FINDINGS of FACT
AGENDA ITEM_9
HEARING DATE..1 Oi ~18..L
PAGE 8
1. The proposed use conforms to the objectives of the
rrter inl Po1 icy IiOClln1ent adopted by the Mayor and Common
CourcjJ Dr ~ay ~3, 19~r, End ~~erded on JDr~ 6, 1~8rl
and approved by the St~t~ Office of PJanning are
Fe~earch on June 9, 1988 in that the document and map
designate this area for General Commercial uses which
includes motels.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
J anc1 Uf;e~ anel the gr Q\'Ith arel cevelopmeI"t of the area in
",hicll :it jf; to t,E' ]occd.pc1 :ir" 1bcd _~1 :if; C'('l1fctjbJe ",j1-},
H~e e>-.i8tjns COlllfi,Ercjcl) Cl(~v(:'J(:rnIE'nt :iT. H,t:, iIJ:nIE.c1;:c:u,
v:iciri.ty anc1 inlpact~ to acljacent resic.entia1 uses havE'
been minimizec.
3. The size and shape of the ~ite proposed for the use are
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed
use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area
NIL to the [l::C'<ce; heoJ tb,- !,()fet~l and genereJ welfare in
11'c.t U,e !.5 tf' can acc:olllmooate the propo~ed Inotel ar.d
~atisfy aJ] reqldrewents fOl setback~, Jondscaping,
ralking ~no access.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways
designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area,
and adequate on-si.te parking is provided in that the 24
foot driveway provjde~ occe~s to Figh]~nd Avenue which
it- ~ w~jor art~IiaJ ~ith sisn~}s at batt Mt. Vje~ erf
f.ifllc1 ~~('i' erc; ff. rclll<5n~ Fpaces ell€' i(,(~ll;lf-(1 ()N~
prov1der1.
5. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the peace,
health and safety and general welfare of the citizens of
the city of 8an aelnardino in that there is no access to
tbe reE',5de~f)t)c::: ~tlfoet fIOIi; ttle pr(J[lo~E'c1 0E-v(;.J(lPIi;(-rt C:,T!C~
c' J:: j €.qld 1 fli,E,'rd f' of t toE Pc,]:: ("(: o[lc1 F hE rEf';'l LrllE:r.t ~ t,c'\'f
~~fn roet 51" b0fit;0n to al] Municipal code requirements
for development.
doc.pcagenda
cup882F
7/12/88
.J
""
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CASE CUP 88-2
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 10/4/88
PAGE q
"'"
1. The building shall be constructed of quality materials.
2. Applicant shall maintain adequate lighting on north side
of complex.
3. There shall be no access permitted on 23rd Street.
4. Operator shall maintain proper and accurate records of
tenants' driver's license and vehicle license plate
number.
5. There shall be no hourly, weekly or monthly room rentals
6. The building interior, exterior and grounds shall be
properly maintained.
7. Owner shall remove any graffiti immediately.
doc.pcagenda
cup882C
9/29/88
\...
""
lo..
r
-
AGENOA ITEM _ . ~ _ _
HEARING OATE --l 0 /4/8],.
PAGE 10
"""l
7.
x
Minor amendments to the plan shall be subject to
approval by the Director of Planning. An increase
of more than 10 percent of the square footage or
a significant change in the approved concept
shall be subject to (Planning Commission)
~xx~xx~ee~ review and
approval. Construction shall be in substantial
conformance with the plans approved by the
Development Review Committee, Planning Commission
or Director of Planning.
-
8.
x
Three sets of Landscape Plans, along with the
appropriate fee, shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department for processing. No
grading permits will be issued prior to approval
of landscape plans.
9.
x
At all times the business will be operated in a
manner which does not produce obnoxious noise,
vibration, odor, dust, smoke, glare, or oth~r
nuisance.
10.
x
Subject to the Conditions of the Department of
Parks and Recreation (attached).
11.
x
In the event that this approval is legally
challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim or action and will
cooperate fully in the defense of the matter.
Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its
officers, agents and employees from any claim,
action, or proceeding against the City of San
Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to
reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys'
fees which the City may be required by a court
to pay as a result of such action, but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his
obligation under this condition.
A sign program for the multi-tenant commercial/
ind~str ial center shall- be approved by the
Planning Department prior to issuance of Certifi
cate of Occupancy.
SP:lmc
PCAGENDA
ST~DCONDITIONS
~
".
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 88-2
"
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM 9 _,_
HEARING DATE _}. 0 / 4l!.~
PAG E 11
"
fARKS, RE~REATION, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
12.
X The developer is to submit a complete master
landscape and irrigation plan (4 copies) for the
Engin. entire development to the ~nnd~ngnDepartment for
approval, upon approval the landscape plans will be
forwarded to the Director of Parks, Recrp.ation, and
Community Services for review and approval. (Note:
the issuance of a building permit, by the Depart-
ment of Building and Safety of the City of San
Bernardino, does NOT waive these requirements/
conditions.
The design shall include, but not be limited to the
following:
.....J.
x
Street trees shall be planted on 35 foot
center spacing unless otherwise
indicated by the Department of Parks,
Recreation, and Community Services. The
Department shall determine the varieties
and loca tions prior to planting. 25%
of the trees shall be 24" box specimens.
Trees are to be inspected by a Park
Division representative Drior to
planting.
14.
x
Planters shall be enclosec with concrete
curbing.
Setback shall be bermed at a maximum 3:1
slope and shall be planted with a tall
fescue type turfgrass.
Landscape buffer zone to be installed
between facilities and street.
\ttachment "D'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE
CUP 88-2
,
AGENDA ITEM _.-9
HEARING DATE .l.Q/ 4/~L
PAGE 12
"
COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL
1.
x
Conditional Use Permii NO. 88-2 shall be in effect for a
period of 12 months from the date of approval. However, if no
development has been initiated at the end of the l2-month
period, the application shall expire. Additional time may be
approved upon request of the applicant prior to expiration of
the 12-month period. Expiration Date: -Ocit6ber 4, 1989.
2.
x
PARKING:
a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of
66 standard off-street parking spaces.
b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two
inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved
by the City Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and
have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any
building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway.
c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across
an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative
wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained
along the property line so as to separate the parking area
physically from the residentially zoned property provided
such wall shall be three feet in height when located within
the required front or street side yard setback. Where no
front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be
three feet in height when located within ten feet of the
street line.
d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the
street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid
decorative wall or equivalent landscape berm not less than
three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along
the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the
required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential
area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall
obscure the required front setback landscaping.
3.
x
REFUSE ENCLOSURES:
l
Whenever refuse bins are located within or adjacent to a parking
area used by the public, they shall be enclosed by a decorative
wall six feet in height along the rear and sides and screened
gate(s) six feet in height along the front. The enclosure shall
~
1.15 Illy
,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
"'"
CASE
CUP 88-2
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
"--
r
AGENDA ITEM _. ~
HEARING DATE 1.0/ 4L88
PAGE 1 3
~
""
not be placed within the required front or street side yard
setback area. Exact location and size of refuse enclosures are
to be determined by the Planning Department and Division of
Public Services Superintendent.
WALLS:
a.
Six-foot high solid decorative walls shall
the north ____, south ____, east ____, and
peripheral ____ property lines. (Only those
or check mark apply).
be required on
west XX- or
marked with "X"
4.
x
LANDSCAPING:
The intent and purpose of this section is to prevent trees and
other landscaping from damaging public improvements.
a. Street trees must be installed at a minimum of 30 feet on
center. Varieties and exact location shall be determined by
the Director of Parks and Recreation.
b. All required setbacks abutting a public right-of-way shall
be landscaped (except for walks and driveways which bisect
or encroach upon the required landscape area).
c.
Four (4) copies of a landscape plan (including
material specifications) shall be submitted to
Engineering Division for review and approval.
plant
the
d. All required landscaping shall be protected from parking
areas and shall be provided with automatic sprinkler
facilities which shall be maintained in an operative
condition.
e. Interior planting shall be required and maintained equal to
at least five percent or ten percent of the open surfaced
parking area excluding the area of landscaping strip
required by subsection "b" and shall include at least one
tree for every five spaces or major fraction thereof.
Measurements shall be computed from the inside of perimeter
walls or setback lines.
f.
The required setback(s) from the north ~, south, ~,
east ____, west property line shall be densely
landscaped with mature trees, shrubs, and groundcover. A
____ -foot landscaped earthen berm shall be erected and
maintained within the setback along the above indicated
property line.
~
l
..., sky
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE CUP 88-2
AGENDA ITEM _!}--
HEARING DATE .J.0/4/8L
PAGE , 4
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
s.
x
6.
x
7 .
x
8
x
9.
x
10.
x
11.
12.
ILLUMINATION:
a. All lighting fixtures in the parking areas shall be directed
away from adjacent properties and the public right-of-way.
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT:
a. Air conditioning and vent ducts shall be directed away from
any adjacent residential uses.
b. All mechanical equipment located on the roof shall be
screened and located away from adjoining land uses.
Screening design shall be approved by the Planning
Department.
Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall
be required (if applicable).
Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City
Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to
precipitation.
During construction, the City Engineer may require a fence
around all or a portion of the periphery of the site to minimize
wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of
fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure
adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control.
x
Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the
maximum height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20
feet unless the Commission determines that due to unusual
topographical or other features, such restrictive height is not
practical.
No Certif ica-te of Occupancy shall be issued pr ior to compliance
with these Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of
the San Bernardino Municipal Code.
x
SIGNS:
All signs shall be in conformance with San Bernardino Municipal
Code Section 19.60. Three (3) copies of a plot plan and
elevation of the sign drawn to scale shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of
the sign permit from the Building and Safety Department.
a. Monument-type signs shall not be located within the required
..., sllY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE
AGENDA ITEM _. 9 . _
HEARING DATE..LO /4/ CL
PAGE 15
CUP 88-2
setback for the zoning district in which the sign is
located. The monument sign shall be located a minimum of 5
feet from the property line. If the monument sign is
located within the setback, it shall not exceed an overall
height of three (3) feet.
b. All freestanding signs must have eight (8) feet of clearance
between average ground level and the bottom of the sign.
csj/S-4-88/6-23-88 Rev.
DOC:PCAGENDA
DOCUMENTS
,,., sRy
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE
CUP 88-2
AGENDA ITEM 0_ 9
HEARING DATE -1.Q / 4 / 8 L
PAGE 16
~
"
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
x
13.
14.
x
15.
x
16.
x
..
x
18.
x
19.
x
20.
x
21.
x
22.
x
\..
Submit plans prepared by a Registered B~K,~t;osr, Architect or
Civil or Structural Engineer.
Submit a complete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a
Registered Civil or Structural Engineer or Architect.
Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Forms
for residential,~~~~ buildings including a signed compliance
statement.
Submit calculations and structural drawings, prepared by a Registered
Civil Structural Engineer or Architect, for the following items:
Submit floor plan of existing structure. Label all uses and existing
materials of construction.
Submit three complete sets of construction plans including;
a. Copy of conditions.
b. Soils and/or t~x~ report.
c. Energy calculations.
d. Structural calculation.
Submi t a pre 1 i mi nary (soi 1 s) KgeoXI:~x~~xm}ggR~)tk~~oHc~~Rx
~~~~~~ report prepared by a person licensed to do so.
Submit a single line drawing of the electrical service. Show all equip-
ment, conduit and wire sizes and types. Show the service ground size and
grounding electrode.
Submit panel schedu1e(s) and electrical plans.
Permit required for demolition of existing building(s) on site.
Submit a plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning system.
(Clearly identify the location and rating of the equipment and the sizes
and material of all ducts, registers and the location of all fire
dampers.) Show means of providing mechanical ventilation as required by
the 1982 Uniform Building Code.
Submit gas pipe loads, sizing calculations and isometrics.
---JI
,.., sky
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
,
23.
24.
x
25.
x
26.
x
27.
x
28.
x
29.
x
30.
x
31.
x
32.
x
l
CASE CUP 88-2
AGENDA ITEM _ .9 _
HEARING DATE _~ 0 14'78L
PAG E , 7
x
""'"
Provide a plot plan showing the location of the proposed sewer system.
Submit a letter clearly indicating the intended use of all areas of the
building. List the materials to be used and the projects produced giving
the amount of each kept in the bUilding. If the building is used for
more than one purpose, list all other uses.
Submit isometric plans of the cold and hot water and drain-waste and vent
systems.
Show compliance with Title 24 for the physically handicapped in the
following: Rest room, Exit ramp
Submit plans approved by the County Health Department.
Indicate methods of compliance for sound attenuation (exterior, interior
party walls, floor/ceiling assembly, ceiling) as per study, U.B.C., local
or State Law.
Show compliance with requirements of high fire areas.
For structures located within high wind areas:
a. Design structure, including roof covering, using 20 p.s.f. wind load.
City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's
Compensation Insurance.
Assessor's Parcel Number. 150-201-08, 38, 40
Contractor's city license.
Contractor's state license.
Sewer capacity rights from Water Department, 384-5093, Neil Thomsen.
School fees from Unified School District, 381-1179.
Other:
DEPOSIT $3,170 plancheck
~
.... Ity
[ ;
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE CUP 88-2
AGENDA ITEM _ 9 ---=
HEARING DATE.JJl1 ffi 8 _
PAGE 18
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
,
33. --X-.
34. X
35.
X
36. X
37. .1L-
38
-X.-.
POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS
SECURITY lIGHTING
""
lighting levels on the exterior of building is to provide a minimum of one
(1) foot candl e of "mai ntai ned/l ill umi nati on on the parki ng surface from
dusk until the termination of business each operating day.
All exterior doors to building shall be equipped with an illumination
device capable of providing a minimum of one (1) foot candle of maintained
illumination at ground level during hours of darkness.
All exterior lighting devices are to be inaccessible to common reach or
climbing shall be protected by weather and vandalism-resistant and be
valdal resistant. All exterior lighting shall be projected so as not to
cast light onto adjoining properties.
All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with
either iron bars, metal gates, stamped metal or shall be alarmed and meet
with approval of the Police Department.
Interior night lighting shall be maintained in those areas that are visible
from the street (ground floor only).
DOORS, LOCKS, AND WINDOWS
Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, solid
wood or metal doors shall be constructed or protected as follows:
a. Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness
of 1 3/4 inches.
b. Hollow metal doors shall be constructed of a minimum equivalent to six-
teen U. S. guage steel and have sufficient reenforcement to maintain
the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is installed
such as reenforcement being able to restrict COllapsing of the door
around the locking device.
c. Except when double cylinder dead bolts are utilized, any glazing uti-
lized within 40' of any door locking mechanism shall be constructed or
protected as follows: Fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant
glazing or iron or steel grills of at least 1/8/1 metal with the maximum
2" mesh secured' on the i nsi de of the ghzi ng may be utilized or the
glazing shall be covered with iron or steel bars of at least 1/211 round
or 111 x 1/4" flat metal, space not more than 5/1 apart and secured on
the inside of the glazing.
~9 I ~ . All Swinging exterior wood and steel doors ~all be equipped as follows:
~ ~
MAY '84
SA. fORM C
'AGE I 0' 15
r
CUP 88-2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
-.,
CASE
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
\...
,
40. X
41.
X
42.
X
\...
MAY '84
AGENDA ITEM _ 9
HEARING DATE 10/4/88
PAGE 19
~
"'Ill
a. A single or double door shall be equipped with a double or single
cylinder dead bolt. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of I" and
be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack.
b. The dead bolt shall have an embedment of at least 3/4" into the strike
receiving the projected bolt. The Cylinder shall have a cylinder
guard, a mnimum of five pin tumblers and shall be connected to the
inner portion of the lock by connecting screws of at least 1/4" in
diameter. The recommendation does not apply when panic hardware is
required or an equivalent device is approved by the Building Code.
Double doors shall be equipped as follows:
a. The active leaf of double doors shall be equipped with metal flush
bolts having a minimum embedment of 5/8" into the head and threshhold
of the door frame. Double doors shall have an astragal constructed of
steel, a minimum of .125" thick which will cover the opening between
the doors. This astragal shall be a minimum of 2" wide and extended a
mi ni mum of 111 beyond the edge of the door to whi ch it is attached. The
astragal shall be attached to the outside of the active door by means
of weldi ng or wi th nonremovable bolts spaced apart on not more than 10"
centers. Hinges for outswinging doors shall be equipped with nonremo-
vable hinge pins or a mechanical inner lock to preclude removal of the
door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. Strike plates shall
be a mi ni mum of 3i II in 1 ength and secured to the jamb wi th screws a
minimum of 2i" in length.
Windows:
a. All moveable windows shall be equipped with a locking device and shall
be constructed in a fashion to restrict them from being lifted out of
its track when in closed position.
Garage type doors; rolling overhead, solid overhead, swinging, sliding or
accordion style..
a. The above-described doors shall conform to the following standards:
(1) Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of five-sixteenths (5/16)
inch in thickness with the locking hardware being attached to the
support framing.
(2) Aluminum doors shall be a minimum thickness of .0215 inches and
riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18) inches on center along
the outside seams. There shall be a full width horizontal beam
attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot, or
pedestrian access, door framing within three (3) inches of the
strike area of the pi lot or pedestrian access door.
,
1
t.
<
~
s'R. I'ORM C
PAGE 2 Of 'S
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE
CUP 88-2
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM __ 9 _
HEARING DATE 10/4/88_
PAGE 20
(3) Fiberglass doors shall have panels a minimum density of six (6)
ounces per square foot from the bottom of the door to a height of
seven (7) feet and panels in residential structures shall have a
denSity of not less than five (5) ounces per square foot.
b. Where sliding or accordion doors are utilized, they shall be equipped
with guide tracks which shall be designed so that the door cannot be
removed from the track when in the closed and locked position.
c. Doors that exceed sixteen (16) feet in width shall have two (2) lock
receiving points; or, if the door does not exceed nineteen (19) feet, a
single bolt may be used if placed in the center of the door with the
locking point located either in the floor or door frame header.
d. Overhead doors shall be equipped with slide bolts which shall be
capable of utilizing padlocks ~th a minimum nine-thirty-seconds (9/32)
inch shackle.
(1) Slide bolt assemblies shall have a frame a minimum of .120 inches
in thickness, a bolt diameter a minimum of one-half (i) inch and
protrude at least one and one-half (Ii) inches into the receiving
guide. A bolt diameter of three-eights (3/8) inch may be used in a
residential building.
(2) Slide bolt assemblies shall be attached to the door with bolts
which are nonremovable from the exterior. Rivets shall not be used
to attach such assemblies.
e. Padlocks used with exterior mounted slide bolts shall have a hardened
steel shackle a minimum of nine-thirty-seconds (9/32) inch in diameter
with heel and toe locking and a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation.
The key shall be nonremovable when in an unlocked operation.
f. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pin
tumbler operation with the bolt or locking bar extending into the
receiving guide a minimum of one inch.
43.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
x
Roof top address numbers shall be provided. They shall be a minimum of
three (3) feet in length and two (2) feet in ~dth and of contrasting color
to background. Numbers shall be placed parallel to street address as
ass i g n ed .
At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project
shall be erected with valdal-resistant cover. The directory shall not to
contain names of tenants but only address numbers, street names, and their
locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so indicated.
MAY '84
SJI. FO RM C
PAGE S OF IS
,
CASE
STANDARD
\...
44. r-x-
/
45. X
\...
MAV '84
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
"'"
CUP 88-2
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM __.9 _
HEARING DATE -1..0/4/88_
PAGE 21
~
,.,
Each building in the complex shall display street address numbers placed in
a prominent location as near the street as practical. Numbers shall be a
minimum of ~x (6) inches in height and a contrasting color to the
background.
All individual offices and buildings within the complex shall be clearly
identified by numbers, letters, or a combination thereof.
The exterior business walls shall be posted with Municipal Code
Section 9.52.070 relative to trespass.
The interior cashier/sales counter shall be located so it is visible from
the building exterior. The floor area inside the counter shall be elevated
a minimum of six (6) inches above the floor of the business.
Access Controls
An access control override device shall be provided for use by Police
Department personnel to gain immediate access.
Common walls shall be as sound proof as possible.
Lockable cold beverage (beer) cases shall be locked at 2:00 a.m.
A pre-set gas monitoring system that allows for prepayment of gasoline
shall be installed to reduce petty theft attempts.
A photo-electric beam across entry door which will audibly notify or ring
when customers enter the store shall be installed.
Ice machines shall not be installed in front of store windows.
Utilization of outside intercom speakers is prohibited.
The placement of outside public telephones shall be restricted to an area
immediately adjacent to the front door of the store.
There shall be a minimum of twenty (20) foot candles of illumination per
square foot of surface area adjacent to gas pumps.
Any display of light should take into account adequate positioning of fix-
tures in order that "stray" light does not affect adjoining property
owners.
Perimeter fencing or cross fencing to prevent criminal movement or acti-
vity shall be installed.
Reflective wall-mounted mirrors shall be installed to discourage
shoplifting.
The placement of machinery (compressor equipment) shall be away from resi-
dential areas to abate the intensity of noise.
~
SR, FORM C
PAGE .. Of III
,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
"
CASE
CUP 88-2
STANDARD
~
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM _ 9 _ .
HEARING DATE .l,Q/j/88 _
PAG E 22
~
46. Open parking lots, and access thereto, providing more than ten (10)
parking spaces and for use by the general public, shall be provided
with a maintained minimum of one (1) footcandle of light on the
parking surface from dusk until the termination of business every
operating day.
47. 1800 field of vision door viewer in all doors of hotel.
48. Accurate roster of people staying at hotel (including license plate
numbers) .
ItlS Illy
.;.
49.
50.
5!.
: ~::.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
- 57':
-;.$9,
._~9 ~
1
CITY
OF
SAN BERNARDINO
CASE CUP 88-2
A~ENOA ITEM _3.
HEARING OATE-1.Q.l4/88-=
REVIEWED BY
PAGE
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
23
PIllB DEPARTMENT REQutREME.NTS
OENERAL. REQUIREMENTS:
(}O Provide one extra set o( construction plans to Buil~ and Satety (or FiM! D~ment use at time o( plan check.
(}4 Contact Fire D~ment (or SCNlCific or detailed requirements - rMPORTAlfT.
(}4 The devetopel' shaU provide (or adequate Fire Flow u computed by tne Fire Prevention Bureau. FIM! Flow shall be based
on square (ooc.qe. construction (eacures and e~ information U sl.q)plied by tJ'Ie devetoper and may be taken (rom two
hydrants.
ACCESS:
[) Provide two diC!erent routes o( irurress/etp'eSS to tne Pf'0ge"Y entrance. The routes shall be paved. all-weatJ'ler.
(J Provide an acc:ea roadway to each buildtnsr Cor tlre ~bIS. Access roadway sI1a1l-have an all-weatJ'ler c1riving surface
ot not less than Zo-teet o( unoostructed wldtJ'l.
(J Extend roadway to within 15~Ceet ot all portions ot tile exterior waUl ot all single-story buildinlp.
() Extend roadway to within 5~(..t ot tJ'Ie exterior waUl ot all muitipte-story buildings.
(}(I Provide "No PARKINO" signs whenever paricinc ot vehides would possibty reduce tJ'Ie durance ot access roadways to less
than tJ'Ie required widtJ'l. Signs are to read '"FIRE LABE - NO PARKINO" (AU caps). "M.C. See. 15.16".
(I Dead-end streets shall not exceed 50~C..t in lefll1h and sI1all have a minimum 35-Coot radius turnaround.
(I The nama ot any new streets (public or private) sI1all be submitted to tJ'Ie Fire Department (or approvaL
SITE:
[J All access roadS and streets are to be constructed and usaJ)le prior to combustibte construction.
(}(I P1-ivate fire hyc:trancs sl1a1l be instaUed to protect each bui1~ 10000ted mOM! than ISo-leet (rom the c:uro line. No fire hydraDt
should be within 4o-t..t oC any exterior wall. The Irydrants sI1a1l be Wet BarreJ. type. with on. ti-inch. and one +-inCh outler.
and approved by tJ'Ie Plre ~ent. Fire hydrants are to be protected Crom clamace by providlnlr suitable tratttc barriers.
The area at'OUftd tJ'Ie fire hydrant sI1a1l be desilJDatea as a "NO PARKINO" ~on. by paintinc an &-;neft wide. red stripe Cor 15-teet
in eacft direc:t1on in Cront ot the hy<!nnt in sueft a manner that it wiu not be btocked by partced. vel1ides. Suitable "YO
PARKING" sips are required.
(J Puollc fire hydrurs shaI.l be pcoovided alOftII' streets at 30o-teet int.....a1s tor commercial and llluiti-t'esidential U'e8S and at
SOo-c..~ int..... Cor f'8ics-tial.,... Inst.aUaCioD shaJ1 c:ontona to City ~cat1ons and be installed prior to combust:ible
cawtruction or stor'III'&.
S1J1LDING:
[jO Tbe adclress oC the srn:c:ture. in six inch num...us.. sb&Il be InstaUed oft the bui1.dInc or in other approved location in sueD a
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUEJLIC WORKS/ENGR~
CASE CUP 88-2
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM ~_
HEARING DATE ~!.4/8a-'-
PAG 24
'"
Project Description: C.U.P. No. 88-2: Construct 6y-Unit Mnt~l
north side of Highland between Arrowhead and Mt. View.
.:7_
. -- J
Da te: 03-28-88
Page -1- of ~ pages
Prepared By: ~ Reviewed By: GRK
Applicant: Great Western Development
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the
applicant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly
to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal
of Building Plans.
Drainage and Flood Control
All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be
----subject to requirements of the City Engineer, which may be based
in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood
Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all
necessary data relating to drainage and flood control.
A 1 oca 1 dra i nage study wi 11 be requ i red for the project. Any
drainage improvements. structures or storm drains needed to
mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be
designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and
right-of-way dedicated as necessary.
The development is 10cated within Zone A on the Federal Insurance
Rate Maps; therefore. a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued
by the City Engineer shall be required.
The development is located within Zone 8 on the Federal Insurance
-Ra te Map s; th~refore. all bu i 1 ding pads sha 11 be ra i sed above the
surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer.
60. 2-Comprehensive storm drain Project No. 7-P7 is master planned in
the viCinity of your development. ThlS drain shall be designed
and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can
conclusively show that the drain is not needed to protect your
development or mitigate downstream impacts.
61.
1---All drainage from the development
approved public drainage faCility.
drainage facilities and easements
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
shall be
If not
shall be
directed
feasible,
provided
to an
proper
to the
'\.
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/E~GR.
CASE cUP 88-2
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM . _ 9
HEARING DATE lO/4{88
P 5
"""'IiI
,-
Project Description:
nnrth cd ti~ nf \.Ii 91:1 hR<;1 bet'rJeeR .'\rretJReae aAe Mt. Vi e'.~.
r II p. Ne. QQ 2: CeAstf'Y&t i4 blAit t1et~1
-..- . ;:.~.~ .
62.
Da te: n~-2~-eS
Page ~ of --1- pages
Gradinq
If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plotl
+--grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil
Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The g~ading plan
shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading
policies and proceduresH and the City's HStandard Drawings",
unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance.
Prepared By: ~
Reviewed By:
CRt(
63.
If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a
~grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised
in accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code.
64.
~If more than 5,000 cubic yardS of earthwork is proposed, a
grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised
in accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code.
A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must
-be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Any grading reQuirements recommended by the approved liquefaction
report shall be incorporated in the grading plan.
66.
.x...-An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where
feasible. this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan
and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the
Municipal Code (See "Grading policies and ?rocedures"l. The
on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan
approval if reciprocal drainage, access. sewer, and/or parking is
proposed to cross lot lines. or a lot line adjustment shall be
recorded to remove the interior lot lines.
x
65.
Utilities:
67. X Design and construct all publiC utilities to serve the site in
----accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the
serving utility. including gas. electric. telephone. water, sewer
and cable TV.
Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer
----facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency
providing such services in the area.
(
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR.
CASE CUP 88-2
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ~~~I~~E li4~
,
"""'lli
PrJlject D,s.criDtion: C.U.P. No. 88-2: Construct 6!4-'Unit Motel
nOr'tTl STCfe 0 Hl 9n" ana between Arrowheaa ana Mt. Vl ew.
lIf;
. .. ~~.
......
Da te: 03-28-88
Page --1 of -2-- pages
Prepared By: "''''G Rev; ewed By: GRK
.'-
68.
x
Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be
constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be
des i g n e d and constructed i n accordance wi t h the City' s "Sewer
PO~icy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings.
X Utility services shall be placed underground and easements
----provided as required.
69.
70. X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the
----site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in
accordance with Ordinance No. MC-601 (Subdivisions) or Resolution
No. 87-189 (Non-subdivisions).
72.
X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be
----relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City
Engineer.
X____Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be
maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to
Ci ty Standards and inspected under a Ci ty On-Si te Construction
Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer will be required.
This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where
practical.
7
Street Improvement and Dedications:
All pUblic streets within and adjacent to the development shall
be improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving,
handicap ramps. street lights. sidewalks and appurtenances.
including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal
modification, relocation of public or private facilties which
interfere with new construction, stiping, signing, pavement
marking and markers, and street name signing. All design and
construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of
San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard
Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
Street lighting, when required, shall be designed and constructed
in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting policies and
Pro c e d u res " . S t r e e t 1 i g h tin g 5 h all b e s how non 5 t r e e t
improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
\.
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGA.
CASE CUP 88-2
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM 9 _
HEARING DATE ..lD/4j8o
~ 'Z
PrQject Oescor.iotion: C.U.P. No. 88-2: Construct 6 -Unit Motpl
nor~ slije ot Hlghland be~ween Arrownead and Mt. View."
Oa te: 03-28-88
Page ":::...J. of .5.. ~._ pages
Prepared By: ~ Rev i ewed By: GRK
(5) A properly designed water system capable of providing
required fire flow. perhaps looping or extending beyond
the phase boundaries.
(6) E a s em en t s for any 0 f the a b 0 v e and the ins tOa 11 at; 0 n 0 f
necessary utilities. and
(7) Phase boundari es sha 11 correspond to the lot 1 i nes shown
on the approved tentative map.
Mapping
A Final Map based upon field survey will be required.
All street names shall be subject to approval of the City
----Engineer prior to Map approval.
Improvement Completion
Street. sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire
project shall be completed. subject to the approval of the City
EngJneer. prior to the recordation of the Final Map.
If the reQuired improvements are not completed prior to
----recordation of the Final Map. an improvement security accompanied
by an agreement executed by the developer and the City wi 11 be
reQuired.
If the required improvements are not completed prior to record-
-ation of the Map. an improvement certificate shall be placed upon
the Map stating that they will be completed upon development.
Applicable to parcel map only less than 5 lots.
73.
ReQuired Engineering Permits:
~Grading permit (if applicable).
X On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see
----Building and Safety)
~Off-Site improvements construction permit
74.
75.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC C:OR~~{~~GR.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM . 9. _
H~ARING OATE -1Q.l4188
'"' 28-
Project Description: C.U.P. No RR-?' rnnC't"IIf"T ii.y,.IIRit Metel
north side of HiQhland between Arrowhp~rl ~nn MT Vipw
-<-'..: '---Q~~
Da te: 03-28-88 Prepared By: ~ Rev i ewed By: CRK
Page ..:;2 of :- .:.2.. pages
Applicable Engineering Fees:
Plan check fee for Final Map.
76. X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements.
77.
--*-,Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except
buildings; see Building and Safety).
78. ~Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required).
Traffic signal participation fee in the amount of $10.00 per
----vehicle trip based on AOT.
Tota 1 amount of fee = S
____Bridge improvement fee in amount of S
79.
Drainage fee based on S
-Total fee = S
X Landscape plan review fee
per acre.
$50.00
80.
X
Four copies of the project Landscape plan shall be submitted to the City
Engineer for review and approval.
An .on-site ~ighting plan :or the project shall be approved by the City
Englneer. ThlS plan can be lncorporated in the grading plan, if practical.
81.
X
,
.
BERNk..JINO CITY WATER Di:. t1RTMt S
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
( "iew of Plans: # 6?/,r::' ~8 - 2
Location:d.l"y-' s;~ ~ /~~..o ~. ~~ #r J1t6~
Typo of Conllruction~ 86'~. Al:;TJi!: ::...'!:!_~. _
owner/Developer:~7 y~ O~_ ~
ENGINEERING: Name:~//~~_ Uh~PA.;'_rJ
g. P.S.J. t?O
)H. Size of Main Adjacent to the Project lid" ,,4. .w'0iJU.;:It:> AV // &:::///1.</ -0/
~ Pressure Regulator Suggested on Customer's Side on the Meter.
o Comments:
Date:
Approved:
Denied:
Continued:
r Iv/ /813
Date: ,-;~~~
~~
o Subject to the rules & regulations of the Water Department in effect at the time of application for water service.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Namo: ~--T ~ Oato: ~z.:k
~ R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.
..;:>( Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. ro.t!!. ,;J::i?~4/,I2:)/
o Air Gap Required at Service Connection.
o No Backflow Device Required.
--
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name: \. )A'h?~
htr-J
Oato: ~p h
I /
A Industrial Waste Permit May Be Required by Environmental Control Officer.
~ Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer.
~ No Regenerative Water Softeners May Be Installed Without Prior Approval of the Environmental Control Officer.
o Approved by Environmental Control Officer.
SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: L/,/p4-
o
~~/ Date: y~~
, /
No Sewer Capacity Charge ApPI~cable at This Time. '?,t3>. hLf,eA ~IT
Sewer Capacity Right Must Be Purchased from the Redevelopment Agency or the MilY(1r/~ nffir.A in the Amount
of Gallons Per Day. Sewer Capacity Rights
C~'o~~~ o..~\\Q.bl\~)
LI'~O
<~ ~ ~"'~~.
. h /1rl
Break~~of Estimated Gallons Per Day:
~ '<t'"\~", E>.> \.~ ~ ~ g I
.".,
,nd/ae
.:::Rt- Proof of Purchase Must Be Submitted to the Water Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit.
o This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees Will Be Determined by Their Department.
#216 5/85
A... J.'ACHMENT "E"
--
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Initial Study
For
Environmental Review
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 88-1
and
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-2
--
To change the zone on the 1.03 acre
site located 100' west of
Mountian View.-. on W. 23rd Street
in order to~: ts{:mstruct a 64 un it motel
Prepared by:
Vivian Stevens
Planning Department
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
('114) 384-5057
Prepared for:
Patrick Chiu
13523 Francisquito Avenue fB
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report is provided by the City of San Bernardino as
-- an Initial Study for the Change of Zone No. 88-1 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2 to change the zone from
property zoned RTR to C-3A in order to build a 64 unit
motel on a 1.03 acre lot located 100' west of Mountain
View on Highland Avenue.
As stated in Section 15063 of the State of California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the
purposes of an Initial Study are to:
1. Provide the Lead Agency with information to use as
the basis for deciding whether to prepare an EIR or
a Negative Declaration.
2.
Enable an applicant or Lead Agency
project, mitigating adverse impacts
is prepared, thereby, enabling the
qualify for a Negative Declaration.
to modify a
before an EIR
project to
3. Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is re-
quired by:
a. Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to
be significant.
~
b.
Identifying the effects determined not to be
significant.
c. Explaining the reasons for determining that
potentially significant effects would not be
significant.
4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the
design of a project.
5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the
finding in a Negative Declaration that a project
will not have a significant effect on the environ-
ment.
6. Eliminate unnecessary EIR's.
7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could
be used with the project.
1-1
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Change of Zone No. 88-1 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
Motel - 100'W of Mt. View on Highland Ave.
March 8, 1988
(
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1 Proposed Project
The purpose of the Conditional Use Permit is to
construct a 64 unit motel on a 45,000 square foot site
that presently has two zones. Half of the property
borders Highland Avenue and is zoned C-3, General
Commercial. The adjacent half borders 23rd Street and
is zoned ftT., Transitional. The request is for
approval under authority of Section 19.06.07 to change
the zone from the existing ftT., Transitional to C-3,
General Commercial on a 22,500 square foot site
located on the south side of West 23rd Street 100 feet
west of Mountain View Avenue.
~
2.2 Project Impacts
Impacts identified in the attached checklist include:
6.a. the possibility that the change in the land use
as designated in the General Plan is different
than that being proposed.
9.a. that the increased traffic will be greater than
the land use designated on the General Plan.
9.b. that there will be a demand for new parking
facilities.
~
2-1
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Change of Zone No. 88-1 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
Motel - 100'W of Mt. View on Highland Ave.
March 8, 1988
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 Location
The
Area
feet
foot
project
on the
west of
area is
is located in the Uptown Redevelopment
North side of West Highland Avenue 100
Mountain View Avenue. The 45,000 square
bounded by 23rd Street on the North.
3.2 Site and Project Characteristics
3.2.1 Existing Conditions
The site is a rectangularly shaped 45,000 square foot
parcel. There is a vacant restaurant on the southern
end of the property on Highland Avenue and the parking
lot extends to 23rd Street.
'--'
The site is surrounded by a mix of land uses. To the
west the Bank of America faces Highland Avenue and its
parking lot extends back to 23rd Street. To the east
is a duplex on 23rd Street and a Commercial develop-
ment on Highland Avenue. There is Commercial develop-
ment to the south, east and west of the property with
a mix of multi-family and single family to the north.
The property zoned Transitional on 23rd Street is near
the middle of the block half way between Mountain View
and Arrowhead Avenues. Property along those two
North/South Streets is zoned C-3, General Commercial.
Within the block three parking lots for the commercial
zones on Highland use 23rd Street for egress and
ingress.
'--'
3-1
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DBPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Change of Zone No. 88-1 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
Motel - 100'W of Mt. View on Highland Ave.
March 8, 1988
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
4.1 Environmental Setting
The 1.03 acre site is bordered by Highland Avenue to
the South, 23rd Street on the North and is 100 feet
west of Mountain View Avenue.
4.2 Environmental Effects
The environmental checklist identifies four areas of
potential concern. Each item checked .maybe. or.yes.
on the checklist is identified below and followed by a
recommended mitigation measure.
6.a. Will the proposal result in a change in the land
use as designated on the General Plan?
'-'
The proposal is consistent with the purpose of
the updated general plan provisions in that the
new plan will incorporate the existing Redevelop-
ment Area plans. This project is consistent with
the Uptown Redevelopment Area Plan.
9.a. Could the proposal result in an increase in
traffic that is greater than the land use desig-
nated on the General Plan?
The change of zone could increase the traffic
demand on the surrounding streets however, it is
used presently by the business on Highland
Avenue. The City Engineering Department stated
that motels do not create peak hour traffic
problems. The exit onto Highland Avenue will
prevent traffic from interfering with the resi-
dential area to the north. Highland Avenue is
designed to carry the traffic in this commercial
area. Any other project considered on this site
would have to be evaluated for its traffic
demand. The proposed motel will not have any
traffic impacts on the residential area as the
only exit is on Highland Avenue.
4-1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Change of Zone No. 88-1 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2
Motel - 100'w of Mt. View on Highland Ave.
March 8, 1988
9.b. Could the proposal result in an increase in the
demand for new parking facilities?
The change of zone would not necessarily increase
the demand for parking however, the project under
consideration will require 66 parking spaces.
The plan presently has adequate on-site parking.
'--'
'--
4-2
CZ 88-1 & CUP 88-2
D. DETERMI~A~lQ~
On the basis of this initial study,
r-1The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
~ environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
o
D The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment; and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
'ljV;i:.:.lf/.)Oi,7-... ~1/,PJ tCl"'JJlrT~F
Name and Title
1 /. " -)
i,IJ/ J" ." J. "./,',
,~_"A..o<..... 1'...........-
Signature
'2. /-,/"J.
./',- /"~:.'
Date:
REVISE.D 12187
PAGE 8 OF 8
J '
At~~NDIX B
t
: I
I I
I t
I
(
-
- . .... ~ ...............!I' "",..".,..... fI ~
----.
~ i
, !
r I
I
0,0
! . II! -eo-
. "
s.
'11111 r; . .
I, ' I ~ r . ·
~~~IJ --,
21: I! g I -4- 0
1;;111 0 ,,],
III, II I' ,
II~ IP, ,---'
II' 'I I . ill
I~'I I I q)~
II. .
~
~ - ~*
,- .
~ !j
'-' t
J
( I
.1
I '"J
I) r
~ ..
-
'I
I I '
.$ "'~_tU:4-
I l
I 1~' ~~ etTj&~i9''''
..
..
ll~
"
, :'" .
=rt[
I
I ;
i I
:s
o
z
=
l
..l~1
"
: ; I
I .
I I
I
I "11 III I
II r E
I I . ~
.. C !III 'II .
I ! till- I
II .1111
. ~ I I
It
iI
. jllll
.; - II
.'pu 51
:1 .111
. I
tl .. I! 'I
II · J
!, .i.,.
I.' !
.. :,:,,1
6-10
-'
....04U...~ .. - \MT ....
-.-.-- 'ao-a.. ... ~8NIJ" AVI.
--..--. -
.... ~- CA
... ' . 0' .. ,.. . .,. - ' .,
.
f
: t
I
( I
-'
. i-
I.
0
I .
. ' "
I i
G ~
~ :t
i i
.- f"
I. ...
t
I.
UI
, .
",
- ..I~
~ .,.;. r- ---
A.. ~achment' " ~H"
-.J U
6-11
(=:~ ~! M--' _
~~:.-~: ...-... "_. ~ Aft.
... _ L" tI~ CA
, ,
I
..~.._-_.- - ~:. .:.. - .-. - .. -."
-
I
" "
....
,
! t
II . .
; l
I
..-- '
I
!
I
. I
j'
I
I
"ee
,
APPENDIX D
I ; I I ~.
I ~': , ; ; I S r
. '.' ~ .
i " :t ..
; i i
t t i' i'"
I. lL
.-,
.
,. -
--
I
II
6-12
~ _tbl_
M1IW:IC ~... ~_ II - UNIT IMXtIL
==-.:=~=r.1 ..~ - IU .. ~ AV"
~'" ~MQ. GA
.
.PPENDIX E
~
'"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
'-"
LOCATION
CASE
CZ 88-1 & CUP 88-2
HEARING. DATE
-
:"ll
.- - - - -r.;:.... ......... ~ . , L........I"I-...',m;J t;;E)'L.:n::J 1...1. ~ ta -0- (
Qij ~ '1ij "':;.j ... ,_ - U r "j~
"., t]]eB" 00 :jhf~L0l.::~~ rC:I:7:":, I;~- ,.,'~
..., ,., ,., ..., ,. ,.,,, r.:lr.:ll OM r ~ ,. '~~"" ... ..II;~u. .. b~
W Ii n:.L " , ":. 11_' "'0" I If-I;.. .0.
:m:::::: lID -I- TI. r - !i Cl
"I R~ I R-I ID[YJ R-I R', 001 ,,-, I~ ~ EE r-
EB-I UlJJ ___ ~ DOl R.t IG@ R-' ~... R., ~
!:_~ .--- ,.....- - ~- --l
-.:0=- .0. R-I R-' ., II. 9
'ji"":I R-I : R'I R-I R-I ill" 11'1 ~ .. ( .. :a -= .. ,
~I ~ ~: :~:a;~ R'I'] :.!I! u' R.I "'1 ",1"'''' :~\. : .1 II.' "i"
~ "jj':-;'"" .O~ ...1\. . ;
~ CEJ. &\ R 'I ,... ~ ~ ...::.;a. c."~ ~, ., R-, i
~aCEJ ! R~3 11-3"'3 .o. ~ R.3 ~ ir.1 R-' c.O~"', i R-' !:! j
!.- ,.....-;-"1n~n:r: tI: t! I:Ir I ~ C-' ) R- 4' T b:
:-1 SIT E: L2..][JU ~ ~ 3. ~ L..:.:.!.. N C-SA I C.SA llOA r c-,...
Uiir": ,...,.- _ -:::-.1 r-- - MI. ~-
n C-J P: ~ ~ ~ ~: C" C" ~-~~. .":':';;..
I~I~I ... C," ,. "~.:r~ ~ ..!...r-utF .....p
I ~..,.. ,.. ~~tt- r%i~OH ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ...\~ ~ ~
I r 11-1 I&~ .'1 10 11-' itH III 1-1 11-';: 1\ ,..... B
.l....1 ~ .... 11-' 11-' .. I.c:;-'-- ~ U "_I "., ,,-I R-I
~ i1I ,..., i"'~~ 8 .., Jiiii t-., c:I "., I. ""
I II'. !if 11-, II ~II" ~~"'IIii~ B "..=r!:O "-Z lAP
, m ~ m M Cf(aB ~-: -: ~.., ..':- ~-:~ ~~
, ~ ~ .:: ~ ~. :~, [E" ~ i ~ ,., l~ W ,., I ,., ,.,
: ~. ~.~ tr~.' ., m., It-, f5 11-' ,&.1: ~., :: ~ R-I R-, 1~-1
"P,...,.. , _II' 0 ~ ~ 11-' R.,.r
....~ , .."i1 = = l=;....-
.,!"'S R-J .--
~.. R-4 1t-4 R-4 It-4 It-,... ,,-. 0 ...~..., ;:.cr 1=....,. "'
· ~Ii ,.. ,., ,. ,.. =~ :e~ ld !: I"'! -: ""'': ,., I
....,. nIT R-4 ".~..., .....~ n [ R-I R~ R..
~ ~ It-4 "I ,,-, .., I., "-J ~ ~ ,;.J Il'n'I 1 L "-I
"pI, It.4 ~I ".4 ~ ".4 ,; -;-.. .. ./ ~
. '-'-- :JIii :II - - -...... ,,-,./ "., R~ !
. ~1~.... ~~. .. ~ ~~: ...., 1.1] C., C.,: r ~ ..,
I t ~11 C-J I I. lh. C" ~C~ c' I:: - =:1:1:'
"- . I I . ~'I ,U =.! ~ ~ ~ ...! CJ C",. C., = C-'~'! Co,
Jg
"0.
-
.0. /1
J
.0.
"-I
~
,,-,
"-I
R-I
.
c...,,.
....1'".."
R-, ~~
= .;;;.;;;
'-'"
R-I -..:= I~_
R'I
,
c-, . L.. c.,
Attachment "F"
~ITY OF SAN dEn.~ARDINO
-
MEMORANDUI\.
To Planning Department - Vivian Stevens
Subject Change of Zone No. 88-1
From Lieutenant L. Neigel
Police Department
Date 27-May-88 "',.,,,.-
rD1 ~ ~ ~ U \~ \~ fij\
~ :~. 1 L:"/
Date
Approved 4 ~
i ..... ,- ....
I ""'I ('I , ..:t;;.,
.... ,.:... ~.. ..
PROBLEM: C:;'/. ".-: ~~;~.~;~~.~,:~.;~~:n~~E;n
Mr. Patrick Chiu & Associates has submitted a Change of Zone NO':;'8a:-f;~'Whtdl' .
would change a parcel (22,500 Sq.Ft.) located on Highland ave between
Arrowhead and Mt.View from a T (Transitional) to a C-3 (General Commercial).
The intended use is for a 64 unit motel complex. The City Council continued
the matter for 30 days to fur.ther study the impacts on the area as it relates
to crime.
RecolTll1enda ti ons:
A study should be conducted through the Crime Analysis Unit and the Vice
Detail in order to determine the crime trends as they relate to the area
in question, otherwise identified as Reporting District (RD) #690. The
specific areas of concern should be crimes related to vice and narcotic
offenses.
Fi ndi ngs :
When the matter first came before us our main concern was that the motel
is planned for an area which does not have the typical transient traffic
through the ci ty as does the freeways, therefore it waul d tend to serve
a local clientele. This type of motel generally has proven to be a law
enforcement problem because they will rent rooms by the hour, week or month.
This type of motel generally draws problems associated with public drunks,
prostitution and narcotic use/sales.
Another initial concern is that less than one block away is a nightclub
building which has been closed since 1987 and is pending a permit request
to reopen as a nightclub which will sell alcohol. When the club originally
opened as a teen night club we experienced an increase of crime in the
immediate area even though the club did not sell alcoholic beverages.
Most of the offenses were alcohol related and drug related.
In 1986 the crime statistics showed a 22% increase in the average crime
rate within the city for that Reportinq District. After the 1987 closing
of the club the reporting district showed a -9% reduction in reported crimes.
We found no prostitution activity in the reporting district during the
same period. We certainly cannot precict that such activity will exist
merely because of the close proximity between t~e motel and the proposed
nightclub, however, if there is a laxity of enforcement in the area we
can certainly project that the offenses related to vice activity will
inCrease dramatically,
Nemorandum
27-r.1ay-88
Change of Zone No. 88-1
At this point our concerns for the area and the impact of the placement
of the 64 unit motel at the proposed site are as follows:
* Increase of traffic related oroblems.
* Increase of transient customers without permanent residency.
* Increase of noise due to traffic and loiterers particularly at nighttime.
* Additional problems due to the motel nightclub proximity.
* Increase of demands for police service due to complaints from
permanent residents about transient residents.
I have submitted my concerns previously to the planning department
through Ms. Debbie Shuker in our crime prevention bureau. I believe that
if we can require certain items from the developers, we may be able to
control the potential problems. Some of those requirements are listed:
* Quality construction which would enhance the neighborhood.
* Quality landscaping which is consistant with our city's beautification
efforts. (This would include trees along the 23rd street parkway).
* Adequate lighting on the north side of the complex near 23rd street.
* No access from 23rd street into or out of the complex.
* Keeping proper and accurate records of tenants' drivers license and
vehicle license plate numbers.
* No hourly, weekly or monthly rentals.
* Quality maintenance of grounds, parkina lot, exterior and interior
of the building.
Currently there are no significant crime problems related to reporting
district #690. Because the property in .question currently houses two
vacant buildings there is little activity reported.
The construction would certainly improve the lot which currently is
stagnant and commercially non-productive.
I would strongly recommend that during the construction phase, the
developer provide for security during the nighttime hours to diminish
crime related to construction site theft and vandalism.
Submitted for your consideration,
rr:~. ~
L. Neigel, Lieutenant
Area Commander - Area "0"
'.
~ITY OF SAN lEP"IARDINO
-
.1EMORANDU' III
To Lt. Larry Neigel
Subject Vice & Narcotics Activity in RD 690
From Joseph Kranyac I I I
O.te May 31 t 1988
Approved
h,/'
Date .s: J 1- i'r'
As per your request I have performed an analysis to determine the level of
vice and narcotics activity in RD 690 and those RD's adjacent to it. The
analysis is for the period of 6/1/87 - 5/31/88.
Reporting District Prostitution Sex Crimes Narcotics Total
630 2 1 8 11
650 0 0 7 7
680 9 4 8 21
690 0 3 8 11
700 0 0 3 3
710 0 0 2 2
1020 0 2 4 6
1550 0 4 5 9
Total 11 14 45 70
~TTACHMENT A
I.rorte Hotels International. Inc..
Nonlr A",.rictlll subsidUlry of Trrullroru. Fon. PLC. 0". O/IIr. worlds LG"ulllol.' GIld ctlMri", co"'ptllli.s willr 01Jf!f' 7501l01.'s wo,ldl1l:id..
JERE M. HOOPER
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
FRANCHISE
June 2, 1988
Hr. TiJrothy Lee
C.'OMPU'l'E.RLAND UPLANIJ
916 NorthM:>untain Avenue #H
Upland, California 91789
A!: 64 Unit M:>tel Developtent, Highland Avenue, San Bernardino, California
Dear Hr. Lee:
Forte fi:)tels International, Inc. is pleased to be in receipt of your application
for the 64 unit rrDtel develaptent on Highland Avenue in San Bernardino. Forte
fi:)tels approves the site and the preliminary plans: however, final approval is
always subject to the results of our credit check. Our Credit Department is in
the process of c::crrpleting a credit check on the application which usually taJ<es
atxJut three weeks.
W! look forward to -.orking with you in San Bernardino on this exciting project.
Sincerely,
~.~~&-
Franchise
JMi/js .
cc: ~vian StevenS (Express Mail)
Patrick Chiu (With Enclosures)
Gene I<brdoban
1973 Fnendship Drive. EI Cijon. Cilifomii 92020 (619) 448-1884 Telecopier (619) ~48-8J96 Telex 69-5429