HomeMy WebLinkAbout46-Community Development
~ITY OF SAN BER~)RbINO - REQUEST COR COUNCIL ACTION
From:
R. Ann Siracusa, Director of Planning
Subject:
Request to Establish Procedure for
Amending the Interim Policy Document
Dept:
Planning
Date:
July 5, 1988
Mayor and Common Council Meetin~.c
July 5. 1988. 2:00 p.m. ~
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
On May 23, 1988, the Mayor and Common Council adopted an Interim Policy Document to
be submitted to the State Office of Planning and Research.
On June 6, 1988, the Mayor and Common Council adopted revisions to the Interim Policy
Document.
On June 20, 1988, the Mayor and Common Council referred the request to establish a
procedure for amending the Interim Policy Document to the Legistlative Review Committee.
On June 23, 1988, the Legislative Review Committee considered the request, gave direc-
tion to staff for revisions to the proposal, and set a meeting to review for June 29, 1988
On June 29, 1988, the Legislative Review Committee reviewed the revisions and moved to
recommend the policv changes to the Mayor and Common Council on July 5. 1988.
Recommended motion:
1. That the prov~s~ons for grandfathering and amending the Interim Policy Document
be adopted as shown in Attachment A.
2. That the policy regarding the multi-family housing projects be adopted as shown
in Attachment B.
Contact person:
R. Ann Siracusa
Phone:
Ext. 5357
Supporting data attached:
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
75.0262
Age';,da Item No_ijj)-
.
r-.
CITY OF SAN BERNH"RDINO -
(')
REQUEST ""R COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
Subject:
Procedure to Amend the Interim Policy Document
Mayor and Common Council Meeting, July 5, 1988
REOUEST
On June 20, 1988, the Planning staff presented to the Mayor
and Common Council a request to establish a procedure for the
amendment of the Interim Policy Document approved on May 23,
1988, and revised on June 6, 1988.
J3ACKGROUND
At the meeting of June 20, 1988, the Mayor and Common Council
referred the request to the Legislative Review Committee. The
Legislative Review Committee considered the request on June
23, 1988, and directed staff to make changes in the proposed
procedure and to draft additional policies.
These revisions were reviewed by the Legislative Review.
Committee on June 28, 1988, and are being forwarded to the
Mayor and Common Council for consideration.
R~C911MENDATION
It is recommended that the Mayor and Common Council adopt
Attachments A and B.
Prepared by: R. Ann Siracusa, Director of Planning
Attachments: Attachment A - Amendment and. Grandfathering
provisions for Commercial and
Industrial Projects
Attachment B -
Policy
Housing
Areas
Density
Regarding Multi-Family
of a Lesser Density in
Designated for High
Multi-Family Projects
csj/6-27-88
DOC:M&CCAGENDA
IPD
75-0264
o
o
ATTACHMENT A
AMENDMENT AND GRANDFATHERING PROVISIONS
FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS
Under the provisions of the Interim Policy Document as
approved by the State Office of Planning and Research, all
projects which are consistent with the IPD may be processed.
This policy addresses commercial and industrial projects
which are NOT consistent with the IPD as approved on June 9,
1988.
I. GRANDFATHERING PROVISIONS
The following commercial and industrial development
projects shall be grandfathered and may be processed
subject to applicable conditions of approval, standard
requirements, rules, ordinances, resolutions, and OPR
restrictions in effect on May 23, 1988:
a. Commercial and industrial development projects
which received approval of a conditional use permit
or review of plans prior to May 23, 1988, and which
are still within the time period of activation of
those planning permits~ or
b. Commercial and industrial development projects for
which applications for conditional use permit or
review of plans were submitted and deemed complete
pursuant to Section 65943 of the Government Code
prior to May 23, 1988.
The planning permit must be activated by the issuance of
a Building Permit within the time specified in the
Conditional Use Permit or Review of Plans in order to be
grandfathered under these rules. No Extensions of Time
will be permitted for projects grandfathered under this
provision.
II. AMENDMENT PROVISIONS
Amendments to the Interim Policy Document to accommodate
commercial and industrial development projects which are
not inconsistent with the adopted IPD and which are not
grandfathered may be considered by the City on a case by
case basis pursuant to the following procedure:
A. PREAPP~I CAJ'J_QtL C_Qr!~~R~J!CE
It is required that the
proposal with a member of
Division of the Planning
applicant discuss his
the Future Planning
Department prior to
'(
AMENDMENT
INDUSTRIAL
Attachment
Page 2
o
o
AND GRANDFATHERING PROVISIONS FOR COMMERCIAL
PROJECTS
A
AND
filing. This discussion should cover in detail the
applicant's request and the procedural steps
required.
B. Flt.JXCLJillQUIREMENTS
1. AppliG~tion Form
Two copies of the application for Amendment to
the Interim Policy Document shall be filled
out and signed by the ~~cord ~ owner are to
be submitted. All applications shall
contain the signature of the legal property
owner(s) or a notarized letter signed by the
legalowner(s) authorizing a third party to
represent vested interests. This applies even
though specific property is in a contingency
escrow to be sold on agreement between
involved parties.
2. M.~p_Qi.~~operty
If a change or clarification is proposed in
the Preferred Land Use Alternative, a map of
the area proposed for the change is to
accompany the application, and is to include
enough of the surrounding area as is
appropriate to adequately study the impact of
the proposal. The size of the study area and
scale of the map shall be determined at the
preapplication conference. An 8 1/2" xlI"
transparency of the study area shall be
provided.
3. Proposed T~~t_CbAQ~
If a change is proposed in the text of the
Interim Policy Document, an exact wording
proposal is to accompany the application. This
proposal shall reference the existing document
change by location, page, and item number.
4. Mailin.9-~b_e_ls
Three sets of mailing
property owners within
required.
labels including all
500 feet will be
o
o
AMENDMENT AND GRANDFATHERING PROVISIONS FOR COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS
Attachment A
Page 3
5. Optiona~Da~a
Any other data which might be helpful in
understanding and evaluating the application.
Other data required will be determined at the
preapplication conference.
C. PROCESSING
Applications for Amendments to the Interim
Document will be analyzed by Planning staff
staff report with recommendation prepared.
Policy
and a
Such applications will be considered at a noticed
public hearing by the Planning Commission at its
second regular meeting every other month, beginning
in August 1988 and including August, October and
December of 1988, and February, April and June
1989. The Planning Commission will make
recommendations to the Mayor and Common Council.
Property owners within 500 feet will be noticed.
The recommendations of the Planning Commission will
be considered at a noticed public hearing by the
Mayor and Common Council at their second regular
meeting every other month, beginning in September
1988 and including September, November, 1988, and
January, March, May, and July of 1989. Property
owners within 500 feet will be noticed.
Members of the General Plan Citizens Advisory
Committee will be notified of the applications for
Amendments to the Interim Policy Document to be
considered by the Planning Commission and by the
Mayor and Common Council.
A cumulative listing of any amendments to the
Interim Policy Document approved by the Mayor and
Common Council will be available within ten working
days of the second Council meeting of the month.
A request for an amendment to the Interim
Document which has been considered by the
and denied shall not be refiled prior
adoption of the General Plan.
Policy
Council
to the
AMENDMENT
INDUSTRIAL
Attachment
Page 4
o
AND GRANDFATHERING
PROJECTS
A
D. FILING FEE
o
PROVISIONS FOR COMMERCIAL
AND
The filing fee for an application for Amendment to
the Interim Policy Document shall be $300.
o
o
.
ATTACHMENT B
POLICY REGARDING MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
OF A LESSER DENSITY IN AREAS DESIGNATED FOR
HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS
Add to the Interim Policy Document the following policy:
Multi-family housing projects of a lesser density, but no
less than 4.6 dwelling units per net acre, may be permitted
in the RH, RMH, and RM land use designations subject to the
standards of the underlying zone district (either PRO or R-3
standards) .
csj/6-27-88
DOC:M&CCAGENDA
IPD