The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About31-Council Office COUNCIL ACTION CORRESPONDENCE To Ray Schweitzer City Administrator Subject School Impaction Fee Program Date September 30, 1986 Meeting Date September 22 and 23, 1986 Agenda Item No. 23 (6) Action The Mayor and Common Council directed that the program which is now in effect with the San Bernardino City Unified School District concerning developer school impaction fees, be continued until the first meeting of the Mayor and Common Council in January, 1987. SC/ps .., cc: Ralph Prince, City Attorney Jim Robbins, Supt. of Building & Safety /dltf7A6 ~AUNA CLARK City Clerk 3/ <, meet with area owners/developers and return to Committee with recommendations within thirty days. 6. REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEVELOPER FEE PROGRAM - SAN BERNARDINO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT - The Committee recom- mended and San Bernardino School District personnel concurred that due to pending state legislation, the present fees and policy would remain the same until the first meeting in January. . 7. EXEMPTION OF SCHOOL IMPACTION FEES BY LAND TECH. INC. - ATTY. GARY W. SMITH - The Committee referred the item back to Council for a review of new information and a deter- mination on whether to hear the issue and if so, set date and time certain for said hearing. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, 6db./~ o~cilman Jack Strickler 1i i rman Legislative Review Committee JS:ej C\J \\}~~ 9- /1 - It COUNCIL ACTION COf'RESPONDENCE To Council Hember Jack Strickler, Chairman, Legislative Review Committee Date September 12, 1986 Subject Request to continue developer fee program in City for coming year to mitigate conditions of over- crowding in S. B. Unified School District !,.f. Meeting Date September 8. 1986 Agenda Item No. 20 Action The matter regarding the request of the San Bernardino Unified School District to continue developer fee program in the City of San Bernardino for the coroming year to mitigate conditions of overcrowding in the School District, was referred to the Legislative Review Committee. The Council agreed that-the assessmentIs to continue at the same -rate' as presently provided for until such time that the report from the Legislative Review Committee comes back to the Council. SC:pa Mayor Wilcox cc: City Administrator City Attorney SHAUNA CLARK City Clerk CIT~ OF SAN BERNARDI....J - REQUE_r FOR COUNCIL AC..ON Date: September 2, 1986 Subject: Request to continue developer fee program in the City of San Bernardino for coming ~ear to mitiga~e conditions of overcrowding ln San Bernardlno Wnified School District. From: Raymond D. Schweitzer Acting City Administrator Dept: Synopsis of Previous Council action: August 21, 1985 -- Council approved Resolution #85-337 establishing a requirement for payment of fees by developers of new residential development to mitigate impacts of such development on local schools, and prescribing a procedure for such payment. Recommended motion: That the request of the San Bernardino City Unified School District to continue the developer fee program in the City of San Bernardino for the coming year to mitigate conditions of overcrowding in the San Bernardino City Unified School District be referred to the Legislative Review Committee. Contact person: John Wi 1 son , Deputv Ci tv Attorney I I I Supporting data attached: yes Phone: 5162 Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Sou rce: Finance: Council NeTes: An~n(h I t~m I\ln- .~ ~tn Bernardino City Unified School District You, Pubb, Scbool, . . . " There's No Better Place To Learn E. Neal Roberts, Ed.D., Superintendent Harold L. Boring, Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent, Administrative Services August 20, 1986 The Honorable Evlyn Wilcox, Mayor Members of the Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Dear Mayor Wilcox and Council Members: Pursuant to the requirements of City Resolution #85-337, the attached report, documentation of a public hearing, and Board of Education resolutions are submitted for your review. The Board of Education requests that the developer f~e program in the City of San Bernardino continue during the coming year in order to mitigate the conditions of overcrowding in the school district. The District is seeking a flat fee of $1748 per single family home and $1373 per multiple family unit in the City and County areas of the San Bernardino City Unified School District. Any questions regarding the attached documents may be directed to this office at 381-1179. Please notify this office when the report is scheduled to be heard before a Council Committee and/or the Common Council. Sincerely, /-\ /1 _/ /}\ .--1// /;1\.. / /.. 77- ... / , - \ \. ' I ,J' I I , ...________. \. J r. ,. R. Scott Shira Manager, Planning and Development RSS:ej :> Enclosures . ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION 777 North F Street · San Bernardino, CA 92410 · (714) 381-1179 Condition of Continued Overcrowding in the San Bernardino Cit Unified School District Prepared by Administrative Services Division) At the meeting of the Board of Education on August 5, 1986, the Board adopted a Notice of Public Hearing on the Condition of Overcrowding in the San Bernardino City Unified School District. This report to the Board of Education shall be submitted to the ~1ayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino as required by City Resolution No. 85-337 and County Ordinance #2409. CURRENT CONDITIONS Conditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School District which will impair the normal functioning of the educational program. The reason for this overcrowding is the construction and habitation of new residential housing which generates increased student enrollment. Projected 4-86 Enrollment 10-86 Enrollment Elementary 19,644 20,703 Intermediate 4,417 4,670 High School 7,058 7,767 Special Schools 212 466 District Totals 31,331 33,606 Functional* Maximum Capacity (FMC) 19,383-21,830 6,162 8,170 500 34,215-36,662 *See Attachment 1 for definition of Functional Maximum Capacity (FMC) and a listing of District Schools. PUPIL YIELD FACTORS In 1985, the District employed a consultant to determine student population yield factors. Ms. Gloria Burbank Okuda and the ED-FAC Partnership conducted a detailed study to determine the number of preschool and school-age children residing in the typical single-family and multiply-family home. Within the District, the consultant contacted 1,754 dwelling units by telephone and a door-to-door canvas. The residences were located in the following study areas or IIgrids": 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,10,12,60,61,62,65,82,191,192,193, 194, 195, 196, 203, 207, 208, 212, 216, 235, 236, 240, 243, 245, 250, 251, 252, 253,255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 268,269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 277, 278, 302, 303, 304, 306, 307, 308, 331, 332, 333, 349, 350, and 351. Y/~c/f& -1- In addition to this survey, the consultant contacted realtors, bankers, escrow officers, and mortgage lenders to determine the family size of those purchasing and renting homes within the San Bernardino City Unified School District. The results of the study revealed the following pupil yield factors on a District-~/ide basis: Single-Family Mul ti ply-Fami ly PRESCHOOL (Ages 3 & 4) .142 .121 ELEMENTARY .468 .397 SECONDARY .231 .169 ADULT EDUCATION .272 .314 The pupil-yield factor for all residences surveyed for K-12 students (including three and four year old children) was as follows: Single-Family .841 Multiple-Family .687 After additional study and discussions with City and County officials, the pupil-yield factor was adjusted as follows: Single-Family .70 Multiple-Family .55 During the Fall of 1986, the District intends to conduct another study to update this data. Until that survey is completed and analyzed, the pupil-yield factors, as previously submitted to the City and County, shall be deemed the current and accurate District-wide, pupil-yield factors. . BIRTH RATES There is evidence to suggest that local pupil-yield factors may increase in future years. The following chart shows that the number of births nationwide has steadily increased since 1975. Prior to 1975, the number of births had been declining since 1957. The recent upturn in births has been termed the "baby boom echo." This terminology means that the current birth rate increase is directly connected to the post-World War II "baby boom" children who are now adults of child-bearing age. According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, the "baby boom echo" will peak in 1988. This phenomenon means that increased K-12 enrollments, on a nationwide basis, will continue through the year 2000. NUMBER OF U.S. BIRTHS (in ~li1lions)* YEAR 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1988(Projected) y};2 u /J~? -2- TOTAL 3,144 3,168 3,329 3,333 3,494 3,598 3,646 3,704 3,741 3,787 3,825 3,879 This national trend is likely to impact the San Bernardino area because of the growth of the area. As new families move into the area, the increasing birth rates will cause an increased demand for public school classroom space. The growth, predicted at 19.9% between 1983-1987 by Chase Manhattan Bank, will result in San Bernardino being the fastest growing large county in California. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT The largest amount of undeveloped land suitable for residential construction is located in the northwestern quadrant of the District. This area, known as Verdemont, is currently being transformed into a new residential community. Between September 1985 and July 1986, in excess of 1,800 building permits have been issued. The City of San Bernardino Planning Department'estimates that the Verdemont area will represent 15% of the total city growth per year. The development of this area is expected to continue beyond the year 2000. The chart below represents the activity expected to occur in the Verdemont area from 1987 to 1991: VERDEMONT RESIDENTIAL GROWTH NEW DWELLING # OF NEW YEAR UNITS STUDENTS* 1987 250 156 1988 250 156 1989 250 156 1990 250 156 1991 290 181 TOTAL 1,290 805 *Assumes an equal number of single family units and multiple family units. Consequently, the pupil-yield factor equals as follows: K-12 = .625 (.7 + .55 + 2) The City of San Bernardino, as a whole, is projected to grow from 55,242 dwelling units in 1986 to 63,762 dwelling units in 1991. This increase of 8,520 residences represents an increase of 15.4% in the total housing stock. ~Jith the exception of the Verdemont area, the new residences are expected to be located throughout the City where vacant and properly zoned land is located. The chart which follows reveals the impact of residential growth on the San Bernardino City Unified School District. ,'\ J~ /"/ (J rC)/i/ f,:.~ -3- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO RESIDENTIAL GROWTH NEW DWELLING UNITS YEAR # OF NEW STUDENTS* 1987 1988 1989 . 1990 1991 TOTAL 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,920 8,520 1,031 1,031 1,031 1,031 1,200 5,323 *Assumes an equal number of single family units and multiple family units. Consequently, the pupil-yield factor equals as follows: K-12 = .625 (.7 + .55 t 2) In the County of San Bernardino, the major area of growth is expected to be in the Devore and Highland areas. Dwelling units in the County are expected to be built at a rate of 400 per year, with 100 units in the Devore area. The remainder of the units will be distributed throughout the unincorporated areas of the San Bernardino City Unified School District. The following chart indicates the impact of this growth on the District: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RESIDENTIAL GROWTH NEW DWELLING # OF NEW YEAR UN ITS STUDENTS* 1987 400 250 1988 400 250 1989 400 250 1990 400 250 1991 400 250 TOTAL 2,000 1,250 *Approved by the County of San Bernardino ?);J (;)/)"'-0 -4- PROPOSED RESIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT with in the SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY NUMBER ATTENDANCE AREA TRACT/CUP OF UN ITS TYPE (**) BARTON 83-28* 20 MF Pumalo/Arden* 328 MF BELVEDERE 13329 53 SF 12949 19 SF 11857-60 113 SF 11884 71 SF BURBANK 12626 15 MF EMMERTON LSH 85-0095* 108 MF KENDALL 10600 68 SF 10648-50 135 SF 12451 247 SF 12220 152 MF 12824 516 r~F 12896 254 MF KIMBARK 10182 60 SF 10183 32 SF 10184-85 45 SF 11038 24 SF 11291-96 222 SF 11391 44 SF 11739 162 MHP 11843-45 116 SF 11881 9 SF 12146-48 258 MF 12150-51 . 318 SF 12629 48 SF 12674 5 SF 12756 120 SF 13029 46 SF 13036 56 SF 13172 452 SF LANKERSHIM 10772* 224 MF LYTLE CREEK 10296 12 SF *Approved by the County of San Bernardino **MF = Multiple Family; SF = Single Family; MHP = Mobile Home Park p)2 c) /i~(.~ -5- ELEMENTARY NUMBER ATTENDANCE AREA TRACT/CUP OF UNITS TYPE(**) MUSCOY 13274 289 SF NEWMARK 12759 6 SF 84-76* 24 MF 12955-58 312 MF NORTH PARK 11741-11757 362 MF 98 SF 11407 196 MF 11745 89 SF 11921 75 MF 12411 69 MF 12481 41 MF 12872 121 SF OEHL 86-51* 594 ~iF 12639 39 SF 11922 750 MF RIO VISTA 13296 18 SF THOMPSON 10358* 185 SF 12735* 188 SF 13237* 36 SF WARM SPRINGS 11308 108 SF 12813 135 SF WARM SPRINGS Base Line/Sterling* 168 MF (con't.) 12468* 104 MF 84-69* 168 MF 84-38* 160 MF E257-74/LSH* *Approved by the County of San Bernardino **MF = Multiple Family; SF = Single Family; MHP = Mobile Home Park n) //"./ () !dt.:)/I V -6- FIVE-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS (Regular and Special Education Students) 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 FMC Elementary 20,703 22,448 23,802 25,035 26,289 19,383-21,830 Intermediate 4,670 4,892 5,201 5,793 6,213 6,162 High School 7,767 8,106 8,365 8,555 9,083 8,170 Special Schools 466 485 504 524 545 500 District Totals 33,606 35,931 37,872 39,907 42,130 34,215-36,662 ;;/20/c'? -7- MITIGATION All reasonable methods for mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated and implemented, as appropriate. No other feasible methods for reducing overcrowded conditions exist. Resolution No. 85-337 and Ordinance #2409 require the review of the following mitigating measures: 1. agreements between a developer and the affected school district whereby temporary use buildings will be leased to or for the benefit of the school district or, an agreement for the temporary use of buildings owned by the developer for the benefit of the district; As of August 15, 1986, no developer has agreed to such an arrangement. 2. the use of relocatable structures and temporary use buildings owned by the district; Students are currently housed at all grade levels with relocatable structures owned by the School District. 3. the use of available tax, bond, and other revenue procedures, to the extent authorized by law; With the exception of developer fees, no other local funds are available to provide classroom space. 4. the use of funds available from any other sources; The use of funds from the General Fund would impair the normal functioning of the educational program. 5. the use of other schools in the district not having overcrowded conditions; The District routinely assigns students to schools with available space when the neighborhood school no longer has the capacity to educate attendance-area residents. Additionally, the court-ordered Desegregation/ Integration program of the District attempts to place the appropriate ethnic category of students in schools with available space whenever possible. 6. the use or sale of discontinued facilities; All District facilities, with the exception of Pacific High School, are in use and providing educational services to the community. The District intends to reopen Pacific high School in the near future. Extensive rehabilitation of the school will be required before the reopening. /;)~()/I'r; -8- - 7. continuous school programs as authorized by Education Code Sections 37600 eta seq.; On July 1, 1986, a continuous school program at Lincoln Elementary School was initiated because of overcrowded conditions. The Year Round Program is already in effect at Ramona-Alessandro Elementary and Hunt Elementary Schools. 8. the filing of appropriate notices of overcrowding with the City/County within attendance areas subject to overcrowding. The San Bernardino City Unified School District filed appropriate notices of overcrowding with the County of San Bernardino on May 8, 1985, and 'August 5, 1985. Subsequently, the County approved the collec- tion of developer fees by the School District in the unincorporated areas within the District subject to overcrowding. A similar notice of overcrowding was filed with the City of San Bernardino. The City adopted Resolution 85-337 on August 19, 1985, to mitigate conditions of overcrowding. In addition to these mitigating measures, the Board of Education approved numerous attendance boundary changes for the 1986-87 school year, reopened the Highland- Pacific Elementary School to ease overcrowding, employed an architect to develop plans for a new elementary school in the Verdemont area, and leased the following number of relocatable classrooms: SCHOOL NO. OF RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS Highland-Pacific Elementary 7 Hunt Elementary 1 Kendall Elementary 1 Kimbark Elementary 2 Monterey Elementary 2 Mt. Vernon Elementary 1 Muscoy Elementary 2 Urbita Elementary 1 Sierra High School 4 Finally, the District applied for new school construction funds pursuant to the Leroy F. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976. The District is not eligible for funding at this time. In addition, the District applied for funds to rehabilitate Pacific High School so that the facility may be made available to ease overcrowded conditions. The State approved this application and authorized a total estimated cost of $3,645,030. The District estimates the cost at in excess of $5,000,000. J~b c)/!\? -9- Despite this difference, significant reconstruction work with State funds will be accomplished. Local funds will be needed to complete the project. CLASSROOt-'l COST 1. Five-Year Lease of Modular Classrooms (Actual low quote from Steelgard, Inc. as of May 29, 1986) TOTAL $11 ,500 7,500 4,000 7,500 7,500 $38,000 1st Year Lease 2nd Year Lease 3rd Year Lease 4th Year Lease 5th Year Lease 2. Site Preparation and Utilities for Classrooms Plumbing Electrical: For electrical, Fire Alarm, Intercom--$25 per linear foot (minimum 150 ft.) plus $125 for Breaker and Enclosure Site Preparation: Paving and Walkway, Leveling and Grading, Sprinkler Repair/removing and replacing fence $ 2,800 3,875 TOTAL 3,500 $10,175 3. Fees and Services for Classrooms Architect I S Fee (7% of the total cost) OSA Plan Check Inspection Tests TOTAL $ 3,652 1,000 1,500 1,500 $ 7,652 $ 6,500 4. Furniture and Equipment ?!av/P? -10- 5. Five-Year Lease of Rest Rooms (Telephone quote from Steelgard, Inc.) 1st Year Lease 2nd Year Lease 3rd Year Lease 4th Year Lease 5th Year Lease TOTAL $12,285 12,285 12,285 12,838 13 ,415 $63,108 One rest room will be required for each nine (9) classrooms. 6. Site Preparation and Utilities for Rest Rooms Water, Sewer, Plumbing Electrical Grading and Paving TOTAL $ 6,000 1,500 2,000 $ 9,500 7. Fees and Services for Rest Rooms Architect I S Fee (7% of Total Cost) OSA Plan Check Inspection Tests TOTAL $ 5,293 1,000 1,000 1,000 $ 8,293 8. Summary of Classroom Costs Classrooms Site Preparation, Utilities, Fees Furniture and Equipment 1/9 Rest Room 1/9 Site Preparation, Utilities, Fees Contingencies SUBTOTAL $38,000 17,827 6,500 7,012 . 1,977 1,000 $72,316 2,169 $74,485 3% Inflation TOTAL This estimated cost is realistic and consistent with other local District costs. A memorandum from Mr. Robert Prosse, Associate Planner for the County of San Bernardino, dated July 28, 1986, states: liThe average total relocatable classroom costs of all overcrowded school districts in the San Bernardino Valley taken from last iY2v/!'? -11- year1s impaction reports was $72,726. Using the 3% index to adjust the cost, an average relocatable cost of $74,908 will be used to review the 1986-87 School Impaction Reports.1I In order to develop an equitable fee for residential units, the following formula was utilized: P "1 Y' ld F t X Cost of Classroom Upl - le ac or 30 Students per Classroom Single-Family Unit .70 X $743608 = $1,748 Multiple-Family Unit .55 X $743608 = $1,373 The amount of the fee requested will provide for leased modular classrooms and furniture. Auxiliary facilities, such as the multipurpose room, kitchen facilities, administration, and teachers work room area are not included in the fee. The cost of land for future school sites is not included in the calculation. FINANCIAL INFORMATION As of June 30, 1986 FUNDS RECEIVED TOTAL $1,809,522.00 83,548.00 6,727.15 $1,899,827.15 Developers Fees - City Developers Fees - County Interest FUNDS EXPENDED (City) Materials Contracts Leases Furniture & Equipment (4590-88-710-100-0) (5610-88-710-100-0) (5620-88-710-100-0) (6490-88-710-100-0) TOTAL $ 9,850.31 77,560.00 204,060.00* 16,378.74 $ 230,289.05 *First year payment of a five-year lease for classrooms. ;~~)/i't -12- FUNDS EXPENDED (County) Materials Contracts Leases Furniture & Equipment (4590-88-710-100-0) (5610-88-710-100-0) (5620-88-710-100-0) (6490-88-710-100-0) TOTAL $ 14t755.84 262.00 69,000.00* -0-. ** $ 84,017.84 *First year payment of a five-year lease for classrooms. **Furniture and Equipment had not been received by June 30t 1986. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 1. The lease costs of classrooms reflect the actual first year lease costs. Lease payments for the next four years are not included as an expenditure as of June 30, 1986. 2. The Board of Education approved an agreement for architectural services on July 15t 1986, to develop plans and specifications for a new elementary school in the Verdemont area of San Bernardino. The preliminary estimate of costs for construction is $4tOOOtOOO. The architectural fees for the project are estimated at $250tOOO. This project will be funded with developer fees collected within the City of San Bernardino. CONCLUS ION The San Bernardino City Unified School District currently collects a uniform District-wide fee within the City of San Bernardino ($lt725 single family/$lt353 multiple family) and a variable attendance area fee in the County of San Bernardino ($287-$lt725 single family/$173-$lt353 multiple family). In the interest of equity to the building industrYt the School District requests that a uniform fee structure be established on a District-wide basis. This type of structure is in effect in the City of San Bernardino. The complexities of the School District allow for the same fee format in the County of San Bernardino. In the October 28, 1985, Minutes of the Board of Supervisors meetingt Mr. John Jaquess, Director of the EPWA Land Management Departmentt stated that, "County Ordinance requires a determination of impaction and fee calculation based on each separate school attendance area within the District." Essential to this interpretation is the concept of "attendance area" as defined by Section 813.0105 of the San Bernardino County Code. "Attendance area" means that portion of a school district with identifiable boundaries determined by the school board, from which children residing within these boundaries would normally be assigned to attend a specified school in the district" (emphasis added). ('~)}c;,~ '? -13- The San Bernardino City Unified School District is currently under a court-ordered Desegregation/Integration Program. The definition of attendance area is not con- sistent with the implementation of this court-ordered program. Over 20 elementary schools offer magnet programs to attract students from outside the school attendance area. These programs are offered to ethnically balance the schools. At the inter- mediate school level, a "controlled open enrollment" program has been implemented to achieve ethnic balance. As with the elementary schools, youngsters may attend schools outside of their assigned attendance areas. Because of the significant num- ber of pupils transferred in and out of District Schools for ethnic balance reasons, the attendance area definition used in connection with County Ordinance #2409 should not be applied to the San Bernardino City Unified School District. A significant number of the actual attendance area population may not normally be assigned to a particular specified school. Additionally, students residing outside the identified attendance area may be assigned to the school. The County's attendance area definition and the development of an impaction fee schedule for new residential construction is appropriate when a school district implements a strict IIneighborhood schoolll attendance area concept in which students of a particular geographical area normally attend a designated school in the neighborhood. The Board of Education respectfully requests that the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino concur with the findings of this report: 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School District which will impair the functioning of the educational program. The reasons for this overcrowding is the construction and habitation of new __,residential housing which generates increased student enrollment. 2. All reasonable methods for mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated and implemented, as appropriate. No other feasible methods for reducing overcrowded conditions exist. 3. The fee to mitigate conditions of overcrowding on a District-wide basis shall be established as follows: Single-Family Unit Multiple-Family Unit $1,748 $1,373 ~~~{ -14- ATTACHMENT #1 SCHOOL CAPACITY The San Bernardino City Unified School District is aware that the Office of Local Assistance and the State Allocations Board have developed guidelines'for determining a school's capacity in relation to the Leroy F. Greene State School Building Lease-Purchase Law. In an effort to meet the unique needs of this District and recognize the requirements of the Greene Act, the "Functional Maximum Capacity" concept was developed. 1. Functional Maximum Capacity: Elementary Level Guidelines and Room Assignments: a. Kindergarten classroom utilizations will be back-to-back with the exception of all-day kindergarten classes (33 students). b. One classroom will be assigned for each 1Q students in grades 1 through 6. c. Special Education - Special Day Classes can function with less than a full classroom, if modified for SDC needs. Resource Specialists will use less than one-half a room, if modified. If the Resource Specialist is in one school all day-and has a maximum of 28 students, a full room will be allocated. d. Support Rooms - all D & I and ESAA programs will be allocated rooms as needed and as determined by the D & I Director and Administrative Services. Each school will have a library and a staff room (not necessarily a classroom). Each building will be given two support rooms (MU Room will count as one room). e. Categorical schools with more than 500 students and one or more resource teachers will be allocated one additional classroom. f. Other requests for classrooms will be given consideration ~ as available. 2. Secondary Schools The intermediate school and high school levels also have unique characteristics because of shop, physical education, categorical program, and special program needs. Subcommittee personnel from each level developed similar but unique formulas for calculating the Functional Maximum Capacities of each school. a. High Schools The guidelines were developed for assessing each school including per pupil allocation for each type of room but each was then adjusted according to special needs. It was decided that since special program room needs vary so much between schools, allocation adjustments would be based on existing programs only. These adjustments can be revised if programs change. ~1J/~ D/j~ Functional Maximum Capacity - Senior High Level Guidelines: (1) All regular classrooms will be filled to the teacher contract maximum of 40 students minus 10% adjustment for scheduling discrepancies (36 students). (2) Art and home economics rooms will be filled to the contract maximum of 32 students minus the 10% adjustment (30 students). (3) Typing rooms will be filled to the contract maximum of 45 students minus the 10% adjustment (40 students). (4) Labs will be filled based on the average number of stations (35) minus the 10% adjustment (31). (5) Shops will be filled to the contract maximum of 32 students minus a 25% adjustment for scheduling discrepanciesjcredentialing constraints (24 students). (6) Each senior high school will be allotted two student support classrooms with an estimated enrollment of 20 students each. (7) Each school will be allotted one additional room for the On Campus Supervision Program. (8) Each band room is estimated to serve an average of 24 students per period. (9) Special Education Special Day Classrooms will be assumed to be filled to the contract maximum of 20 students and will use rooms which are smaller than regular classrooms whenever feasible. (10) Special Education Resource Specialists will use less than one-half a room, if modified. (11) All rooms allocated to Categorical pull-out programs (Comp. Ed., Bilingual, etc.), requiring a full room, will not be counted in the school's room utilization allotment. (12) Physical Education projections assume that current graduation requirements and enrollment patterns will continue as the schools approach maximum room utilization. The following formula was used to establish projected Maximum PE enrollment: maximum room utilization Current PE enrollment X current room utilization ~~ b. Intermediate Schools Similar to the high SChOD1, the intermediate school formula provides a capacity for each type of program and makes adjustments for special programs: Functional Maximum Capacity - Intermediate Level Guidelines: (1) All regular classrooms will be filled to the teacher contract maximum of 36 students minus a 10% adjustment for scheduling discrepancies (32 students). (2) Art and home economics rooms will be filled to contract maximum of 32 students minus the 10% adjustment (29 students). (3) Typing rooms will be filled to the contract maximum of 40 students minus the 10% adjustment (36 students). (4) Shops will be filled to capacity by actual stations minus a 25% adjustment for scheduling discrepanciesjcredentialing constraints. (5) Each regular intermediate school will be allotted one additional room for Opportunity Class. (6) Special Education Resource Specialists will use less than one-half a room if modified. (7) Special Education Special Day Classrooms will be assumed to be filled to the contract maximum of 20 students and will use rooms which are smaller than regular classrooms whenever feasible. (8) Each band Room is estimated to serve an average of 20 students per period. (9) All rooms allocated to Categorical pull-out programs (Comp Ed, Bilingual, etc.), requiring a full room, will not be counted in the school IS room utilization allotment. (10) Physical Education enrollment must be limited by the total number of students which can be housed in all other rooms since each student is required to take one period of PEe The resulting formula: 90% of the maximum room enrollment = 6 projected maximum per period PE enrollment ph/h~ SCHOOLS IN THE SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: ALESSANDRO ARROWHEAD BARTON BEL VEDERE BRADLEY BURBANK CALIFORNIA COLE CYPRESS DAVIDSON DEL ROSA EMMERTON HIGHLAND HUNT KENDALL KIMBARK KING LANKERSHIM LINCOLN LYTLE CREEK t~ARSHALL MONTEREY MT. VERNON MUSCOY NE\~MARK NORTH PARK OEHL PARKSIDE RILEY RIO VISTA ROOSEVELT THOMPSON URBITA VERMONT WARM SPRINGS vJI LSON INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS: ARROWVIEW CURTI S GOLDEN VALLEY MIDDLE RICHARDSON PREP HI SERRANO SHANDIN HILLS HIGH SCHOOLS: CAJON SAN ANDREAS SAN BERNARDINO SAN GORGONIO SIERRA nJ..2c~~ Public Hearing It is in order at this time to call upon the public for comments about the conditions of continued overcrowding and the collection of fees from housing builders and developers, as reported above. HOLD PUBLIC HEARING Resolution Following the Public Hearing, if the Board of Education concurs with the report, then a Resolution of Condition of Continued Overcrowding is in order by adoption of the following resolutions: SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONDITIONS OF CONTINUED OVERCROWDING WHEREAS student enrollment is increasing within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified School District, located in the City of San Bernardino and certain unincorporated areas of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS a substantial portion of the increased student enrollment is a result of the construction, sale, and habitation of new residential dwelling units; and WHEREAS the projected student enrollment growth will tax the capacity of the District's normal housing ability on a District-wide basis; and WHEREAS in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions or dedications of land from the developers of such new residential developments, this District would not have the financial resources available to provide adequate housing; and .. WHEREAS Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970; added to Statutes of 1977, Chapter 955) Division 1, Title VIr of the Government Code, makes provision for financial or other assistance by developers to a school district if the governing board of the school district has made a finding that conditions of overcrowding exist in one or more attendance areas of the district and if such finding includes the additional information specified in Government Code Section 65971. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to Government Code Section 65971 and related ordinances of jurisdiction in which the District is located, this Governing Board makes the following findings: 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School District which will impair the normal functioning of the )pc//b educational program. The reason for this overcrowding is the construction, sale, and habitation of new residential housing units. 2. All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated and no feasible method of reducing such conditions exists. 3. The fee to mitigate conditions of overcrowding on a District-wide basis shall be established as follows: Single-Family ~iulti pl e-Family $1,748 Sl,373 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of this Board deliver certified copies of this resolution to the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino. I 1/ ~h/;I . ' SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIS'l'RICl' CONDITIONS OF CONTH-JJED OVERCRCJ.IDING RESOLUTION \'JHERE/\.S, student enrollment is increasing within th::;- r,;Qw1cbries of- th::;- San Bernardir'n City Unified School District, located in the City of San Bernardino cmd certain nnincorporatcd areas of the Connty of San Bernardino; and WfIEPElIS, a suf.Jstantial portion of the in::reased student enrollr1Pl1t is a resul t of the constl.uction, sale, and lktbi tatioi'} of new residential dvelling nnits; and hm~l::Z1S, the projected s,tudc::J.t enrollment gro.~.th \vill ta.'{ the cal".JCl.~ity of the District IS nonral housing ability on Cl district-\'lide basis; ar J WHEREl\S, in the absence of assistance in the fom of fina..'1clal contributions or dedications of land from the cY2'.relop2rs of such DeN residential develoflnents, this District woald not have finnncial resources available to provide adequate hoasing; and h'HEPJTJ\S, Chapter 4.7 (carrrencing with Section 65970, added to Statutes of 1977, Chapter 955) Division 1, 'l'itle VII to the Goverrurent Coje, makes provision for financiu.l or oth2I' assistance by developers to a scho:)l district if the governing board ot the school district has nude a finding that conditions of overcra,,-(hng exist in one or nore attendance areas of the district, and if such finding includes th2 additional information specific~d in Coverl'ul'ent Code Section 65971; THEREf'Or\E, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to Coven1nc::J.t CcYJe Section 65971 cmd relat.ed ordinances of jurisdi.ction i:1 which the District is located, this Governing OOill.-d ma.kes the follo.ving findings: 1. C'.onditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School Di~;trict which will impair the nonnal fW1ctioning of the educational prCXjrarn. '1'he reason for this overcroVv'cling is the construction, sale, cU1d hubi tat ion of new residential hou:::.ing l1.'1its. ~A.-- ~{, 2. 1\11 re.:1sonable m:c~thods of mitigating conditions of overcrO\.,uing have been evaluated, and no fl.~asible m::!thod of reducing such conditions exists. 3. The fee to mitigate cor,ditions of overcrodding on a District-'i'lide basis shall be established as follo.<1s: Single-Family Multiple-Family $1,748 $1,373 Head and adopted at San Bernardino, California, on this 19th day of .I'.Ugl..lSt, 1986 14/// /fJ1;j / ,....'""/;..;:--: :,:' -L'-e.v /;.i( -ft--..{/I44<< /""" . cf',~. 4;/ /." ~.r---- r -" ,/-~-~7", ..r;.~h /' i-(/_J'<<-<_.lA--=~-> ~ /, . Yice-prejident /-:-?/~ (~Lj /,-/,6 rc_...t<',/;-?~~.~' ~---- - t.:;; :f -,.., :// -. j' ;- (' l"errber !Q ~;{A/(t" /11 //\ ~-'it:? / t7 President I-12lrber Menber Iv1enber H2Irber ;r/2(..,j;; SAN BERNAP "10 CITY UNIFIED SCHr DISTRICT CERTIFiCATiON OF Mli~UTES The Board met in regu 1 a r session on the 19th meeting place thereof. The meeting was called to order at 5: 30 day of P\ugust o'clock p. m. . 19 86 ,at the usual Memberspres~nt: H. Brown, Christie, Diaz, Obershavl Members absent: t1. Brown, Gras sma n, Ne i ge 1 The adoption of the following resolution and order was moved by Member Obershaw . and seconded by Member H. Brown . and a vote being taken, the said resolution and ordE:r was adopted by the following votes of members pres~nt at that time. AYES: Members H. Brown, Christie, Diaz, Obersha\'1 NOES: Members None ABSTENTIONS: Members None THEREFORE DE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to Government Code Section 65971 and related ordinances of jurisdiction in which the District is located, this Governing Board makes the following findings: 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School District which will impair the normal functioning of the educa- tional program. The reason for this overcrowding is the construction, sale, and habitation of new residential housing units. 2. All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated and no feasible method of reducing such conditions exists. 3. The fee to mitigate co~ditions of overcrowding on a District-wide basis shall be established as follows: Single-Family ~lultiple-Family $1,748 $1,373 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretat'y of this Board deliver certified copies of this resolution to the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino. I, LORN E l3Af"(G['lANN, f\s s is ta n t Secretary of the Governing Board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly made, adopteG c::nd entered in the Board minutes of the Governing Board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District on the 19th day of AU(lust ,19 86. ;:J Dated: August 20, 1936 ~ ~V~ " ~- a,.tL-(.....vt A./ >fI, \;.L'/V..-;;!1-vL. (y...t--'... '_d- ~ Secret~y~ Board of Education Agenda Item 1 ] SU-12 ("le'_ 10/83) San Bernardino City Unified School District Resolution And Notice Of Public Hearing On School Impaction And The Continued Implementation Of Land Dedication Or Developers' Fees ~tlEREAS. for some time past there has been a continuing and substantial increase in population within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified School District. located in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County. to the extent that the school facilities of this district have become overcrowded; and ~~EREAS. that population growth has manifested itself in an increase in student population of the schools of the San Bernardino City Unified School District; and ~~EREAS. thousands of additional housing plans have been approved or are in the planning stages. which would also bring additional students into the school district. and ~nEREAS. the San Bernardino City Unified School District has limited space available to house the increased numbers of students in a suitable educational environment. THEREFORE. the Board of Education of the San Bernardino City linified School District of the County of San Bernardino. intends to 1. determine whether or not overcrowding. which will impair the normal functioning of educational programs. will continue to exist in one or more attendance areas within the district. and 2. assess reasonable methods of mitigating the conditions of over- crowding if overcrowding continues to exist. ;) An ~;Fl 2. Assess reasonable nethods of mitigating the conditions of overcrOY.Uing, if overcro,.lO.ing continues to exist. BE IT RESCLVED tJmt a public hph.,...ing will be held on 'August 19, 1986, at 5: 30 p.rJ. at the Board of Education Building Corrcnunity Room, 777 l\'orth F Street, San BernaIdi."1O, California, to determine whether or not overcrOY.Uing CQ.'"1ditio.'1S cont:L'"1ue to exist or will continue to exist, evaluate whether feasible rrethods for reducing such conditions exist, and dete....Yffiine whether or not fees or dedication of land shall be imp:>sed on developers. BE IT FURIHER RESOLVED that Notice of this intent to continue the inplerrentation of land dedication, or developer fees, shall be posted ll1 three public places, not less than ten (10) days prior to the public hearil1g, and shall be published not less than once a wee.'< for 'Dt."O successive weeks prior to the public hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published within the County, and The Sun is hereby designated as the newspaper in which 5uch Notice shall be published as aforesaid. IN vIT'l'NESS of the passage of the foregoing resolutions and order in the fom and nanner prescribed by law, we, . the rrerrbers of said Board, prese."'1t and voting thereon, have hereunto set our hands this 5th day of Augtlst, 1986. Herr~Js of the Gcroerning Board San Bern.a:..--dL'10 Ci t}-"tU::1.ified SCDCf.)l Dis-....rict 777 No=th F Stre2t SaIl BernarO.LT1O, Ct". 92410 )/204t . . ., :~;~::+3:~::.:;;;:::.:+:+X"::f.:c.r.+:c..::.::"::+:*::';C+::K+~:"<:(dG':';(.::.:iji:..:+:)!o:€"ti:::+::...:c.+::.::"":"':.:.~:..X.::i!o::.:.::a3.::.::it::.~..:..::.::,,:'tX.:::.:KK+::"':.::t.::t~. ~ ~ R ~ ". 0 0 -1-. . It- Cfi ,'j ::::;:J Vi .... ~ r '_. r :.; CD y-"':::;CD - ~<': --= Y' CD en ',-,: ~ g'.g'~ a 6~~ "" 2.~ en : ~eng. . (J) n 0 e= S". g- ~ ~ ~~(.I) 5 c:c (.I) a. c:: ~o: g ~. - '" ',,; " -II: -,." ~ - - '" ~ 3 3 '" '" a. 0.. Q) _. .., Q),< c;;en Cl) ("') ("') :J :JO o 2. o '" Vl ;-C- ,~-. 'l~: I~ il~ ... ~i~ d /\~ ..;,~,/ I ",' .;; /r ~ .. (,' ! /1 I I: " " I . I ~1" ',) ;''1i1 i ~ i~i' ~:;} ./ I' I, I ~ s ~ !of ~ .;" I ~ ",. li; . a 0 I I ,~ ;~ ~, : II ~~- -t--I i ~ '~ 11 I'. d ~: 31 ' ';~ ~ '~~ ,- , , ~ 1 l fJ. ;~ " ~~ or ."'-r'" ---. \j.i .... r-"'-'.#--""'\o. '.- ; I :: -'-'--i'"'" ~ I / r~ '~ ~ ~ ,I ,,1 f ~ · . j-r~-I :.". ; 5"" r i ~ ._~. 1t'"\ rlh 1f1"\'~. I / g~!, rf~ '. V41-~-l;0t~ I :;t ~: & .: I: 2 ~I r ~ ~.-".-".-.L".-".-".-,,_.-,,_ " s: '.;.; ~ II V~'~~"~'~.A l,.-.&- ~"'-""l n n -..-..- ,.\ ~ r,-I c>n l i! r H I ~ g"~'; \:= I I ---~;' r \ I ~,.-,j r- i:" 'tl", ',\l 't :. r,.-,.-J i I / /"{/~l s --.-".--i4 i 11/, 1 ii i a' ~ 1 , ~a.1 = s i I \ 5 r'-r-'-i J \\ L_/_J-i'~ L,,-r- r-- I I: ~1 I ~ i Ii \ 1 ! Jt:"1l' i: -".--.......... .....___~_.....-A ~--/-- ".--"" . .j..-i....---l It" ~ i \ ~ ~ ~ , _.......~..........,.,.~'...,.A . ~ ~ s ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ t'-....."O';...;.,~1- --I ........~ l.~-~~~....r;M~1.-.-s~.Ui'" ArU"'I-.~ :~ ~ .; ,;, "~ "' :, " .~ " ,', ;": .~ :,; .~ '. Ii! ;; ~ .'" ~...- v~...,.~~~,~,~ '" < ~ >{. "... :~..f.>/::~... ....{....i' ..-"~':.:~"';'::~.:>.<'~:: t:..>, ,,!, , ,I' ;l!; .",.