HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-303
1
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-303
2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING
MENDMENT NO. 6 TO SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ICF JONES & STOKES
FOR PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE
4 DESIGN OF THE MT. VERNON AVE. VIADUCT OVER THE BNSF RAILROAD.
3
5
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
. .
6 OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
7 SECTION 1. That the City Manager is authorized to execute Amendment No.6 to the
8 Services Agreement with rCF Jones & Stokes for provision of professional environmental
9 services for the design of Mt. Vernon Ave. Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad (attached and
10
11
12
13
incorporated herein as Exhibit "A").
SECTION 2. This Amendment No.6 shall not take effect or become operative until
fully signed'and executed by the parties and no party shall be obligated hereunder until the time
14 of such full execution. No oral agreements, amendments, modifications or waivers are intended
15 or authorized and shall not be implied from any act or course of conduct of any party.
16
SECTION 3. The authorization to execute Amendment No.6 is rescinded if the parties
17
to the contract fail to execute it within sixty (60) days of passage of the resolution.
18
III
19
20 III
21 III
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 1 -
2010-303
1
2
3
4
5
6
RESOLUTION ... APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO SERVICES
GREEMENT WITH ICF JONES & STOKES FOR PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL
NVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF THE MT. VERNON AVE.
IADUCT OVER THE BNSF RAILROAD.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
omr~lOn Council of the City of San Bernardino at a joint. regular
meeting thereof, held
day of September
, 2010, by the following vote, to wit:
7
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
8
MARQUEZ X
9 -
10 DESJARDINS X
11 BRINKER X
12 SHORETT X
13 KELLEY X
14 X
JOHNSON
15 X
MC CAMMACK
16
17 ~};.~
18
19 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this q~ day of September, 2010.
20
21
22
Approved as to form:
23
24 JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
25
26
27
28
IL
- 2 -
2010-303
Exhibit" A"
AMENDMENT NO.6 TO SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this ---.Z.t.L day of Septp.mher ,2010, between ICF
Jones & Stokes formerly known as Jones & Stokes, formerly known as Myra L. Frank/Jones &
Stokes, and also formerly known as Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc. ("Contractor") and the
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ("City)".
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, on December 1, 2003, the Mayor and Common Council of City
adopted Resolution No. 2003-326, approving a Services Agreement with Contractor for
Professional Environmental Services for the design of the Mt. V emon Avenue Viaduct over the
BNSF Railroad; and,
B. WHEREAS, on December 20, 2004, the Mayor and Common Council of City
adopted Resolution No. 2004-400, approving Amendment No.1 to Services Agreement with
Contractor for Professional Environmental Services for the design of the Mt. V emon Avenue
Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad; and,
C. WHEREAS, on January 8, 2007, the Mayor and Common Council of City
adopted. Resolution .No. 2007-13, approving Amendment No.2 to Services Agreement. with
Contractor for Professional Environmental Services for the design of the Mt. V emon Avenue
Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad; and,
D. WHEREAS, on September 4, 2007, the Mayor and Common Council of City
adopted Resolution No. 2007-368, approving Amendment No.3 to Services Agreement with
Contractor for Professional Environmental Services for the design of the Mt. V emon Avenue
Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad; and,
E. WHEREAS, on February 17, 2009, the Mayor and Common Council of City
adopted Resolution No. 2009-31, approving Amendment No.4 to Services Agreement with
Contractor for Professional Environmental Services for the design of the Mt. Vernon Avenue
Viaduct over the BNSF Railroad; and,
F. WHEREAS, on July 6, 2010, the Mayor and Common Council of City adopted
Resolution No. 2010-235, approving Amendment No.5 to Services Agreement with Contractor
for Professional Environmental Services for the design of the Mt. V emon Avenue Viaduct over
the BNSF Railroad; and,
G. WHEREAS, the said Services Agreement, as amended, is valid until December
31,2010; and
H. WHEREAS, Contractor, by letter dated August 5, 2010 (Attachment "A"), has
requested a sixth amendment to increase the not-to-exceed fee and to extend the term of the
Agreement due to delays beyond the control of the Contractor or City; and
2010-303
Exhibit" A"
Amendment No.6 to Services Agreement -ICF Jones & Stokes
Page 2 of3
I. WHEREAS, City anticipates that the services of Contractor will be needed
through June of 20 11.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Section 2 of said Services Agreement is amended to read as follows: Over the term of this
Amendment No.6, Contractor shall be paid an additional amount of $92,258.00 for
Amendment No.6 as indicated in Attachment B for a not-to-exceed total compensation of
$463,102.00 for all work contemplated under the terms of this Agreement as Amended as
follows:
a) Services Agreement approved per Reso. No. 2003-326 . . . . .. $ 123,524.00
b) Amendment No.1, per Reso. No. 2004-400 . . . . . . . . . . .... . . 45,375.00
c) Amendment No.2, per Reso. No. 2007-13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000.00
d) Amendment No.3, per Reso. No. 2007-368. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". 83,925.00
e) Amendment No.4, per Reso. No. 2009-31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98,020.00
f) Amendment No.5, per Reso No. 2010-235 ...................... 0.00
g) Amendment No.6 (this request) ..................................... 92.258.00
Total not-to-exceed amount. . . . . . . . .. .$ 463,102.00
2. Section 4 of said Services Agreement shall be amended as follows: The term of this
Agreement shall end on June 30, 2011, unless further extended by written agreement of the
parties.
3. All other terms and conditions of said Services Agreement approved by Resolution No.
2003-326, Resolution No. 2004-400, Resolution No. 2007-13, Resolution No. 2007-368,
Resolution No. 2009-31 and Resolution No. 2010-235 shall remain unchanged.
III
III
2
2010-303
Exhibit" A"
Amendment No.6 to Services Agreement -ICF Jones & Stokes
Page 3 of3
AMENDMENT NO.6 TO SERVICES AGREEMENT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date shown
below.
Date:~
rCF JONES & STOKES
~
by:
Signature
~Sr\\\\.l , J\W Pf\l\b~
Print Name/Title
CITY OF SAN BERNARD 0
Date:
q - / L/---/ (j
by:
~ harles E. McNeely
I City Manager
ATTEST:
C?~ h.~
Rac~ Clark, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
James F. Penman
City Attorney
By:
3
2010-303
ATTACHMENT A .
-
ICF
INTERNATIONAL
August 5, 2010
Mr. Robert Eisenbeisz
City Engineer
City of San Bernardino
300 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001
SUBJECT:
Request for Amendment No.6
Mt. Vernon Ave. .Bridge Service Agreement
Dear Mr. Eisenbeisz:
This is a request for Amendment No. 6 to our existing Service Agreement with the City of San
Bernardino for the Mt. Vernon Avenue Bridge project.
SCOPE OF WORK
Our scope of work comprises the following activities associated with the preparation and
processing of environmental documentation for the Mt. Vernon Avenue Bridge project:
Technical Studies
Community Impact Assessment (CIA)
Previous Amendment No.4 assumes one round of review of the CIA. The CIA was resubmitted in
December 2009 per May 2009 Caltrans comment, completing the one round of review. (The
delay in submittal was due to the lack of completed traffic numbers required to fully address
Caltrans comments.) Additional Caltrans comments to the CIA are pending. We will respond to
pending comments and submit the CIA for one additional round of review by AECOM and
Caltrans. The cost estimate has been updated to include this additional round of review and the
final copies.
Additionally, the cost estimate includes the following tasks not previously scoped: (1) CIA
submittal in March 2010 based on February 2010 Caltrans comments (2) CIA submittal in June
. .
9715 BusilestlNlrk Avenue, Suit. 200 - s"n Diego, CA 92Ut - 8~.518.8964 _ 851.511.0573 fa. _ icfi.<om
2010-303
Mr. Robert Eisenbeisz
. August 5,. 2010
Page 2
2010 based on May 2010 Caltrans comments (3) Revisions of property acquisition/construction
easement figure previously prepared by LAN Engineering based on May 2010 Caltrans
comments and (4) Revisions per AECOM comments received in November/December 2009 and
twice in February 2010.
. Section 4(f)
Previous Amendment No. 4 assumes two rounds of Caltrans review and approval and no new
comments beyond those identified in Caltrans letter dated 11/25/08. The Section 4(f) study has
was resubmitted in March 2009 and December 2009, completing the two rounds of review
assumed in Amendment No.4. This scope assumes that no additional revisions to the Section
4(f) analysis will be required.
The cost estimate includes the following tasks not previously scoped: (1) May 2010 Section 4(f)
revision per comments received from Christie Hammond (submittal to Caltrans pending) and (2)
Revisions per AECOM comments.
Noise Study Report (NSR)
PreviQUs Amendr:nent No.4 assumes an update .of the NSR. In Iie.u pf the update, a technical.
opinion was provided by ICF to address Caltrans comments dated 11/25/2008. The technical
opinion was submitted for one round of review by AECOM. New comments regarding the NSR
were received in May 2010. This scope assumes that a June 2010 technical memorandum
sufficiently addresses the recent comments and a revised NSR is not warranted.
The cost estimate includes the following tasks not previously scoped: (1) Technical
memorandum prepared June 2010 per May 2010 Caltrans comment which has been submitted
to both AECOM and Caltrans.
Initial Site Assessment (ISA)/Asbestos Containing Materials/lead Based Paint (ACM/lBP)
Previous Amendment No. 4 assumes the ISA would be submitted for one round of review,
without revisions to the ACM/lBP report. The October 2009 ISA was revised and resubmitted in
January 2010 for one round of review per Amendment No.4. This scope assumes no additional
revisions to the ISA or ACM/lBP Report.
The cost estimate includes the following tasks not previously seoped: (1) Revision of ACM/lBP
report.
Scoping Summary Report
The original contract and amendments do not include a scope for the preparation of a Seoping
Summary Report. This report was initially prepared by Myra Frank and Associates and
subsequently finalized/submitted in Spring 2010 by ICF. This scope assumes no additional
revisions to the Seoping Summary Report are required.
-
ICF
INttltfU.TIONAl
2010-303
Mr. Robert Eisenbeisz
August ~, 2010.
Page 3
The cost estimate includes the following tasks not previously scoped: (1) Preparation and
submittal of Scoping Summary Report.
Other Technical Studies
With the exception of the CIA, we understand that all technical studies have been approved by
Caltrans and that no further revisions will be required. The cost estimate assumes that updates,
or preparation of new technical studies will not be required for issue areas such as: (1) Water
Quality (2) Location Hydraulics (3) Geotechnical Report (4) Air Quality (5) Relocation Impacts and
(6) Traffic.
Draft Environmental Assessment (EA)
Previous Amendment No.4 assumes two rounds of review and that submittal #1 (March 2009)
and submittal #2 (December 2009) would address both Caltrans environmental project
management review and Caltrans NEPA Delegation QC review. The EA is currently in NEPA
Delegation QC review and this scope assumes 2 additional rounds of review prior to submitting
final documents to Caltrans.
The.cost estimate has been updated to include:
· Submittal #4 of the EA (submittal pending, in response to Caltrans May 2010
comments),
. Submittal #5 of the EA for review, and
. Submittal #6 of the final Draft EA requiring no subsequent revisions.
Additionally, the cost estimate includes the following tasks not included in the original scope of
work: (1) March 2010 submittal #3 of the EA (2) Five additional copies of the EA for submittal #1
(3) Revisions per AECOM review prior to Caltrans submittals #1, #2, and #3 and (4) Complete
document reformat due to changing Caltrans guidance on Cumulative Impacts.
Draft Environmental Document Circulation
Public Meeting Attendance
The original contract assumes attendance at one public meeting during Draft Environmental
Document Circulation only and attendance at a 2004 public scoping meeting was not scoped.
The cost estimate includes the following tasks not included in the original scope of work: (1)
Attendance at 2004 public scoping meeting and (2) Public meeting attendance by one additional
lead planner, upon request by City or AECOM.
NOTE: Only a Notice of Opportunity for public hearing is required for NEPA compliance;
however, based on recent experience with Caltrans District 8, it is assumed an open forum
informal public hearing will be required and the meeting would be attended by two ICF lead
planners and llCF Principal Architectural Historian.
iCi=
INTrANATIONAL
2010-303
Mr. Robert Eisenbeisz
August 5, 2010
Page 4
Public Meeting Logistics
The original contract assumes City will reserve the meeting location and provide any other items
required for the hearing (e.g., tables and chairs, court reporter [if required], and audio/visual
equipment). It is assumed this scope remains unchanged.
Document Distribution
The original contract assumed only one CD during DED distribution. Based on recent experience
with Caltrans District 8, distribution of CD's (containing electronic copies of the environmental
document) may be required to property owners directly affected by acquisition or temporary
construction easement. The cost estimate has been updated to include CD distribution to a
maximum of 20 property owners.
The original contract does not include payment of newspaper notices, sufficient reproduction of
the combined Notice of Availability (NOA)/Notice of Public Hearing (or Notice of Opportunity for
Public Hearing), postage for the NOA, postage for DED distribution, or preparation of an
electronic copy of the Draft EA for posting on the Caltrans District 8 and/or City website. The
scope assumes the NOA will be distributed to property owners and tenants within a 0.25 mile
radius of the project area. The cost estimate has been updated to include these items.
The original contract assumes the City would be responsible for distributing the document to
the 90 addresses on the distribution list and State Clearinghouse, along with the NOA (to
approximately 1000 addresses within * mile radius of the project area) and assumes only 50
copies would be provided for distribution. The cost estimate has been updated to include
reproduction and distribution of the 105 copies of the DED and approximately 1000 copies of
the NOA.
The cost estimate also includes the following tasks not previously scoped: (1) Previous
coordination of cost estimates for newspaper articles and (2) Materials for DED distribution.
Additionally, per Caltrans request, a full distribution list, including property owner addresses,
was provided per November 2008 and May 2009 Caltrans comment. At the time of the
upcoming scheduled DED distribution, this distribution list will be outdated and will require
updates. The cost estimate has been updated to include an updated distribution list with
current property owner addresses.
Record of Public Hearing
The original contract does not include a scope for preparation of a Record of Public Hearing.
Based on recent experience with Caltrans District 8, a Record of Public Hearing would be
required. The cost estimate has been updated to include preparation and submittal of the
Record of Public Hearing. It is assumed that this document will be submitted for one round of
review prior to submitting final copies.
-
ICF
INn.NATlONAl
2010-303
Mr. Robert Eisenbeisz
August 5, 2010
Page 5
Final Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact (Final EAlFONSI)
The original scope assumes one review cycle of the Final EA/FONSI and deliverables would be
limited to only 1 hardcopy and 1 electronic copy of the Final EA. The cost estimate has been
updated to include:
. 2 additional rounds of review, ~ncluding 3 rounds for internal AECOM review
. 12 copies of the Final EA/FONSI with each submittal
. preparation of an electronic copy of the Final EA/FONSI for posting on the Caltrans
District 8 and/or City website
The original scope did not identify preparation of response letters in reply to comments
received during public circulation, should formal letters be required by Caltrans District 8. The
estimate has been updated to include a maximum of 20 response letters (up to two pages in
length) per comments received during public circulation. Responses will be coordinated
between the City, AECOM and Caltrans.
PDT Meeting Attendance
previous Amendment No. ~ did include atten.dance at monthly .PDT meetings. The cost ~stimate
has been updated to include:
. Nine monthly PDT meetings attended by Project Director Brian Calvert through March
2011.
Additionally, the cost estimate includes the following meetings not included in the original scope
of work: five PDT meetings attended by Project Director Brian Calvert through June 30, 2010
Deliverables
Community Impact Assessment (CIA)
. 1 Copy - CIA (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans submittal, in response to
pending Caltrans comments
. 5 Copies - CIA for Caltrans review, in response to pending Caltrans comments; includes
City and AECOM copies
. 1 Copy - CIA (final)(electronic), for AECOM review
. 5 Copies - CIA (final), with no subsequent revisions; includes City and AECOM copies
Caltrans EA Submittal #4
Environmental Document only
. 1 Copy - EA (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans submittal, in response to
Caltrans May 2010 comments
. 5 Copies - EA for Caltrans review, in response to Caltrans May 2010 comments; includes
City and AECOM copies
reF
INtUNATlONAl
2010-303
Mr. Robert Eisenbeisz
~ugust 5, 2010
Page 6
Caltrans EA Submittal #5
Environmental Document only
. 1 Copy - EA (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans submittal
. 5 Copies - EA for Caltrans review; includes City and AECOM copies
Caltrans EA Submittal #6 for approval to circulate
Full final submittal EA and Technical Reports, with no subsequent revisions
. 1 Copy - EA (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans submittal
. 12 Copies - Environmental Document; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Historic Property Survey Report; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Finding of Effect; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Memorandum of Agreement; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Natural Environment Study; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Noise; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Community Impact Assessment; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Section 4(f) - within Environmental Document; includes City and AECOM
copie~
. 7 Copies - Visual Impact Assessment; includes City and AECOM copies
. 7 Copies - Paleontological Identification Report (PIR) and Paleontological Evaluation
Report (PER) ; includes City and AECOM copies
Circulation Documents
. 20 CD's for property owners affected by temporary construction easement or property
acquisition
. Notice of Availability (NOA)
. Newspaper Articles formatted for three different publications
. Electronic copy of the Draft EA for posting on the Caltrans District 8 and/or City website
Record of Public Hearing
. 1 Copy - Record of Public Hearing (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans
submittal
. 5 Copies - Record of Public Hearing for Caltrans review; includes City and AECOM copies
. 1 Copy - Final Record of Public Hearing (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans
submittal
. 5 Copies - Final Record of Public Hearing, with no subsequent revisions; includes City
and AECOM copies
Caltrans FINAL EAlFONSI Submittal #1
. 1 Copy - Final EA/FONSI (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans submittal
. 12 copies of the Final EA/FONSI for Caltrans review; includes City and AECOM copies
NOTE: labor associated with Final EA/FONSI submittal #1 was included in the original contract.
---
ICF
INtlaHATIONAl
2010-303
Mr. Robert Eisenbeisz
August 5, 2010
Page 7
Caltrans FINAL EAIFONSI Submittal #2
. 1 Copy - Final EA/FONSI (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans submittal
. 12 copies of the Final EA/FONSI for Caltrans review; includes City and AECOM copies
Caltrans FINAL EAIFONSI Submittal #3
. 1 Copy - Final EA/FONSI (electronic), for AECOM review prior to Caltrans submittal
. 12 copies of the Final EA/FONSI, with no subsequent revisions; includes City and AECOM
copies
STAFFING
The ICF Jones & Stokes contact person for this scope of services described above is Jean
lafontaine, at (619) 602-8685.
COST ESTIMATE
ICF Jones & Stokes proposes to provide the attached services on a time and materials basis for
$92,258. The attached spreadsheet provides the details of our estimated cost. Upon approval
of this amendment, our agreement with the City of San Bernardino will be amended as follows:
Services Agreement approved per Reso. No. 2003-326
$123,524
45,375
Amendment No.1, dated 12/20/2004
Amendment No.2, dated 1/8/2007
Amendment No.3, dated 9/12/2007
Amendment No.4, dated 2/19/2009
Amendment No.5, dated 7/6/2010 (contract extension only)
Subtotal:
20,000
83,925
98,020
o
$370,844
Amendment No.6 (Proposed)
Total (Revised)
$ 92.258
$463,102
Should you need additional information, please call Jean Lafontaine at (619) 602-8685.
Sincerely,
Charles Smith, AICP
Vice President
reF
,"TUNAlIONAt
=
Eo-
Z
~
~
=
u
<
r-o
r-o
<
2010-303
..
o
z
C
~
..,
~
0(
1>
..
"f
Q.
..
'"
..,
'C
III
..
~
c
~
0(
c
o
E
~
c
~
o
::E
.~ I
~
"i
6
.I-
j
~
~
~
~
i H jj
i U jj
. )i i
J I j-
t II j
ill
~
i
.2
..
...
.5
...
w
...
o
U
..
:;;
{!
I
~
i
,
l
2010-303
.~
i
[.
~
~ llilli2ia!lli~lii!.1l1~!il!lll!
i lli lli lli Ii lli lli lli~: lli lli lli ~ti
" :., ,., ,., ~~ ~
&~ ............ ~~.
U.......t~t......,..r~r.lT!~jn ~ ~ ~ ~
I"""~."", ~
W ! i ! ! i ! i i 1 ! 1 l !
~
I
I
1
!
ij I : : : ~
Illlll:~alll!~iiia,lli~li'rl
. , .. , . , . .....
. , .. , . , . ..,.,
I \ II \Ni \ :N:
~u~
u
..
.;
z
C
~
" s
~ .
~
<I: ~
.. i
..
'[
0..
..
'"
"
.~
III
..
,
~
~
<I:
~
0
E
~
~
,
0
::IE
.2
!
~
..
w
..
0
0
..
:a
..
....
I~ H J]
ill l
i It J]
1 U J]
Jut
C I I J 1 "1"1'.1..t.t~(>"'''i''~''i''1'' ~! $
I ""."""." ::l
Ii: : : : : ! i 1 i : :
i H j :111111,111:11 ~ ! ~ 2
i . j :: ..Ld.LU..'n'.ti.....ln : : i :
~ ]i r . . . . . . . . . . .. ~N
. ~ i ~ ..1..Lt.H"I~,..'nl"1~...L ~ ~
II] ] i \ i i i : : ::: i i ~ ~ ..
2 ..~..~u+.t..r..~..~..~..!..!..~..~.. 10 ;!.
I .11 ~'i ' , , , , , , : , , , , .. ~ S N
c!i~:E8l~1ll~ii!li! :taN
I ! 1 ! nr1~nn:inn'1"nl ~ ~ ! ~
!II :rrj\li"lllf:;:
{ I i
f . ~
w i
S
" ~ ~
..;;:...:
:5: X m. S
:::;~m~
"2'"
Nt-. If.
.~ .
1 . :I
:_,' Ji. :~::
:~;i i :~:i
!~!~ iiit !~~
.<.~. 'l<'~' 'i.l
if~ i f, ~it i!il
'~'i: ']'j'i' '1,li
:Ij~ ijilf ,rr
Il~f !iH .~!~l~l
; 4~; !Ul i'l!~~
,',~,~, : ,,~,~, ",":":
&i!i! i~!tt !~!lil!
: g:~.~ : o:~:~ : o:i:t
i~tll! :~tit' lUll
a :~:;:;: i~;!iI: i~i H
;!~jIJI~!~Jiji;l~:! :1
!'1"'!';!'1"';!"''l+
!itig!g!!! t!g, g,!i!\g: gi
~i~ ~i~i~: ~~:~: ~:~~\~:
~'~'~'.' ~'~'.'.' ~'~'~'.'
~i~l ~:~: ~l ~:~i ~i ~:!i ~j ~i
i' "I'~i' "1I.' '.iil'
3i~~~i3:~~'~~I~~'~
~
~
~:i~n~~~.-
il
~
i
"
"'
,
Jj
!'
~,
"
l
1
~:
~.
I
I .
I .
~p
1 ""!
~Hh
I-'- ~ JllL is
~
i
8
~
Ii !
P I
-q: ~
Hht
~o ~ .
~lh~l
ii~~
''!~!l
~nh
I~!~~
hhtj ~
~.'ii 'D 8:1.a ~.
. .. . "1 "
hUil ·
38U1SS8 iii
s~~ss~ ~~