Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR16-Redevelopment Agency - RECJVELOPMENT AGENCY-IOlJEST FOR ~ISSION/COUHCIL A~ION From: Glenda Saul, Executive Director Subject: TO ACCEPT OR NOT ACCEPT NEW INDUCEMENTS FOR PROJECTS SEEKING MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS ,,-... I........ It: Redevelopment Agency Date: December 10, 1985 Synopsis of Previous Commission/Council ection: 1984 & 1985 Council has induced $219,539,983 of Multifamily Bonds, totaling 4,610 units. Racommendad motion: (MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL) c A) Motion of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino declaring a moratorium on any new applications for Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds. or B) Motion of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino to continue to accept applications for Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds for approval on a case-by-case basis by the Mayor and Common Council; ,~A.~ Signatu re Contact person: G:ICluta Saul Phone: 383-5081 Supporting data attached: YEE Ward: X/A FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $ N/... Project: >>1.\ No adverse Impact on City: Date: l71G/EB 12 16 85 BLL~mb~r 1&, 1985 Council Notes: C Agenda Item No,R- / b - - .- CIO OF SAN BERNARDIQ) - REQU~T FOR COUNCIL ACWON r- ~ STAFF REPORT Staff is seeking direction in policy for multifamily mortgage revenue bonds. If the current Tax Reform Act pending in the congreas passes, it will severely limit the city's ability to issue private activity bonds. Pending legislation would put IDB' s, Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonda and Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds under the same allocation cap. In other words, the city would have approximately a $7,000,000 allocation to do these types of bonds - which would limit the city to one issue. Transfers of allocation would be much more difficult to obtain because although other citiea may not be issuing industrial development bonds,many do issue hOUSing bonds and will need their allocation for these housing issues. The status of multifamily mortgage revenue bonds is as follows: Pending TEFRA Induced Closed Closing in 85 Hearing Held No TEFRA $ amt 219,539,983 45,175,000 33,000,000 46,400,000 94,964,983 'units 4,610 1,140 873 1,071 1,526 Reported to State C 160,575,000 45,175,000 33,000,000 40,900,000 41,500,000 (3,883 (1,140 (873 units) (1,000 units) (870 units) units) units) c 75.0264 As you can see, the city has approximately $175,000,000 of multifamily mortgage revenue bon< induced. Staff is still receiving requests from developers to induce this type of financing. Currently, there is no way to call whether or not the Congress will pass the legislation. It will probably not be passed in 1985, but the effective date of the legislation would remain January 1, 1986, if passed in early 1986. Staff recommends a moratorium on new inducements for multifamily mortgage revenue bonds. l71G/EB 12-16-85