Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-Public Works From: c.'iv OF SAN BERNARD~ - REQU~NFOFrCOUNC'L ACT.JN REC'D. - AD Milt c?;' . Subject: ReJect10n of Bid -- Provi sion of L~7 ':r; -~; f'~a!\tdj,cap Accessibility for Perris Hill and Blair Parks, per Plan No. 7226 -- REDLANDS PAVING ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Dept: Public Works/Engineering Date: 11-02-87 Synopsis of Previous Council action: ~~ 6-01-87 Allocation of $44,050 from the 1986/87 CDBG Program, approved for Phase I of handicap accessibility at City Parks. . Plans approved and authorization granted to advertise for bids. June, 1986 10-05-87 Finding made that provision of handicap accessibility needed for health & safety reasons. Recommended motion: That the bid received on 10-22-87, for handicap accessibility for Perris Hill and Blair Parks, be rejected, and the Director of Public Works/City Engineer authorized to advertise for bids. cc: Ray Schweitzer Warren Knudson Ken Henderson Annie Ramos ~f~~/-- SlY atllle Contact parson: Roqer G. HardQravp Staff Report, Report of Bids & Resolution Phonal 5Q25 Supporting data attached: Ward: f)... /5 . ? FUNDING REOUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (ACCT. NO,) 121-544-57522 (ACCT. DESCRIPTION) Handicap Accessibilitv at City Parks Finance: Council Notes: 75-0161 Agenda Item No. 7. , CIC OF SAN BERNARDI~'-o - REQUe.!I!',T FOR COUNCIL AC"'.ON 75-0264 STAFF REPORT Bids for this project were opened at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 10-27-87. Only one bid was received, in the amount of $61,733,50. The low bid of $61,733.50 is 60.7% over the Engineer's Estimate of $38,424.00. Seven Contractors took out plans and specifications for bidding purposes. However, only 3 attended the mandatory pre- bid field review, and only one of those submitted a bid. We feel the one bid received does not represent a competitive pricing situation. After discussing the bid received with the Department of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, we have concluded that it would not be advisable to attempt to identify the necessary supplemental funds to finance the total project cost, based upon the bid price. Therefore, we recommend that the bid be rejected and authorization granted to re-advertise for bids. 22-02-87 c ~ '} 0 !'o.: z '\\ 0 "" ~ c z "" ~ .... CIl ~ Z c U '" fJ. It. 0 ~ I '" tj !;t 0 c.? Z Z '" CI- 0 0 m , ~) I ! I i 1 ,. I V\ I <: :<: \ 'V\ "I:: C'-- ~ \2.1 .~ \~ !~' \ . ~"J" \...... <> "" o'~ ~ ~V~ ~ It. ':i, ~ \0 ..,<:::. ,~~ !Z ~~I (.) \ , , ::l ~ "I " 10 ~.~ \ , :! I ' Y'\I I IC\~ ~: ~ '" ~1 .;::" ~~'\I!,. , p \ I \ "" ~\ '" ~ ~1 "'.....:.. , '", '" \ v "'. .~ ~i '^" '" t:...!' ''f"\ '::c ~I.."" . ~!\ m: I ~', t-, <:,. u: , < I .~ ~ c;:, " .~ ! 1 ~ 'Jli \ I ".\' i 'jl i ['..., I : \ I 0: \~ I '" i 0: 0 ~I i '" 0 \ i m Cll .::1 I ::;: , ;:) ... ~ I Z 0 I I 1 z "': I ::;:' i <( <(I I -' '" I CI- z: '::::. I I 0: i -, I , i \ 0 ~\ , \ z I I o. -, >UI \ .... , <( I !\lj ~I ) I ~I N M V .., '" "I co en 0 .... N M v ~\ i \ .... .... .... .... .... CI- ! <JJ. I '" '::.L 4i "- '""- '>- k \J \ I' -r '" z z ... "- o 9 CIl -' .... u > "- z j:: ::> - " o l;j u"""- z~2: occo ::;:a:u ::;:....... o!!!o u!:.... 02:"" zoo <(ell; o:~"" 0- .. >-u.... o:x: ..~ ::;:::;:'"'> ..om oa::;:) .......<JJ '.J ~ .~ ~ " - ~ '""" V N , '-.I "" vO I>' v --,. <- ~ z o ~ Cl- a:: u <JJ '" o o m , ",I \ ~\ , ~I 1 \ >-i i ~ ...! z 1 ;:) _, 0 ) ::;: <( 0 j ;;.: m m ~ 0 '" 0 0 ..J a:: I- ::;: 0 Cl Z <( U z '" ~ '" Z 0: a:: J: <( 2: <JJ t) Cl- 0: 0 a: CI- L;: :> <( m .. c c a: z w C -' C Cl J ... z w :IE ... a: " .. w \ c " '" ... "- z ....i oJ ii: >- <( .~ w m m -' 0 Ii I .. '" m c 0: U ..:J: iii <( z 'I Cl- .' '" '" -S! >- a:: Z a: Cl- ;:) ~ " z , " vI t) '- , I Co. ;;.: z m 0 ~I 0 >= " '" a: ,,~ U ... Z !!! ~ i ;:) Z I 0 :Ii .... I z c <( I z " ::;: <( w ~ I 0 ... lfl Z :;: '" <( ~ , c.? ci 0 z z '" Z z C 0: .... '" ;:: '" '" z CI- :> Z ;:) 0 co 0 lfl a: c.? U 0 ... z u V> w <( ill a