HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-Development Services
,.""'....,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
~
From: Valerie C. Ross, Director
Subject: Resolution approving Amendment
No. 1 to Agreement with LAN Engineering
Corporation for civil engineering design
services and project management services
for State Street from 16th Street to Foothill
Boulevard - extend and construct (4) lanes
of roadway (1.5 miles) to connect State
Street to Rancho Avenue (SS04-09).
Dept: Development Services
Date: July 15,2009
File No. 1.7245 MCC Date:
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
August 3, 2009
06/18/01 Resolution approving Contract No. 01-082 with San Bernardino Associated Governments for
the State Street Extension Project.
02/04/02 Adopted Resolution No. 2002-36 approving Agreement with Lilburn Corporation for
preparation of environmental documents for the extension of State Street.
03/19/07 Adopted Resolution No. 2007-94 approving Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with Lilburn
Corporation for preparation of environmental documents for the extension of State Street.
07/21/08 Adopted Resolution No. 2008-281 approving Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation
for civil engineering design services and project management services for State Street from
16th Street to Foothill Boulevard - extend and construct (4) lanes of roadway (1.5 miles) to
connect Stale Street to Rancho Avenue (SS04-09).
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution.
Jilwj;C:j(~
Valerie C. Ross
Contact person:
Robert Eisenbeisz. City Engineer
Phone:
5203
Supporting data attached: StafIReport, Reso. & Amend. No.1 Ward: 6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $ 800,000
Source: (Acct. Nos.) 264-484-5504-7245
Acct. Description:
SS04-09 State Street construction from 5th
Street to 16th Street.
Finance:
Council Notes:
-
Agenda Item No. / :3
i>-3-ott
-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
Subied:
Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation for
civil engineering design services and project management services for State Street from 16th
Street to Foothill Boulevard - extend and construct (4) lanes of roadway (1.5 miles) to connect
State Street to Rancho Avenue (SS04-09).
Back2round:
On June 18,2001, the City executed a contract with SANBAG to utilize $2,005,000 of Federal
Highway Surface Transportation Project (STP) funds for the extension of State Street between
5th Street and 16th Street. Because federal funding is involved, the City is required to comply
with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA compliance for the project is
subject to both Caltrans and Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) approval.
'-
On February 4, 2002, an Agreement was executed with Lilburn Corporation in the amount of
$61,174 for the preparation of environmental documents needed for compliance with NEPA.
Lilburn subsequently completed a draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the City's submittal
to Caltrans. The environmental process throughCaltrans Local Assistance was not completed as
a result of: I) Caltrans requesting additional information; 2) Caltrans change in guidelines; and
3) numerous delays, primarily due to changes in Caltrans personnel assigned to the project.
Therefore, the environmental document has become outdated and in need of revision based on
Caltrans guidelines.
On March 19,2007, Amendment No. I in the amount of $25,000 to Lilburn's Agreement was
approved establishing a new scope of work to address the revisions necessary to prepare a new
EA.
Shortly after approval of Amendment No.1 to Lilburn's Agreement, Caltrans announced that it
was revising the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) form and that the old form would no
longer be accepted. This resulted in a requirement to essentially restart the environmental
process, although the previous studies can be reused subject to being updated and/or
supplemented.
When the new PES form was released in January of 2008, it became apparent that considerable
engineering design work would be needed to complete the new PES form. This engineering
design work was not in the scope of Lilburn's services and not within its area of expertise.
On July 21, 2008, the City entered into a contract in the amount of $827,385 with LAN
Engineering to provide detailed engineering work to support the environmental consultant. The
scope of services for the contract consisted of project management, records and utility research,
alignment study and survey, topographic mapping, bridge structure review, geotechnical
--
2
""'-"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT (Continued)
investigation, hydrology and hydraulic report, traffic report review, preliminary engineering
design and right-of-way needs identification.
Unfortunately, managing separate environmental and design consultants proved inefficient and
not in the best interest of the project. City staff requested a proposal from LAN Engineering to
add to its scope of services processing the environmental document through Caltrans, redesign of
the Lytle Creek bridges to meet current standards, supplemental geotechnical studies for the
bridge work, updated traffic impact analysis, V alue Analysis including technical staffing, and
public presentation graphics. Much of the work done by Lilbum can be reused in the
environmental documents to be prepared by LAN Engineering.
LAN Engineering's proposal in the not-to-exceed amount of $800,000 for FY 2009/2010 for the
additional work was submitted on July 6, 2009, and is attached to Amendment No. 1 as
Attachment "A". LAN Engineer has agreed to participate in the City's 5% discount program.
Therefore, 5% will be deducted from each of the Consultant's invoices associated with this
Amendment.
The following is a surrunary of costs incurred to date as a result of this Agreement for Services
with LAN Engineering Corporation:
"-'
Totals
Amount
$ 827,385.00
$ 800,000.00
$1627,385.00
Although the cost of Amendment No. 1 seems large, these costs must be incurred in order to
properly complete environmental clearance through Caltrans and obtain obligation of federal
funds. LAN Engineering Corporation is a large, multi-disciplinary engineering firm with a
proven track record for efficiently processing complex projects through the Caltrans process.
An additional amount of approximately $488,670 will be needed in FY 2010/2011 to complete
the environmental clearance and final design of the project. This amount will be recommended
in the FY 2010/2011 Capital Improvement Program budget.
A separate Amendment to the Agreement with LAN Engineering will be submitted in July of
2010, recommending that the additional amount be authorized. If approved, the additional
Amendment will authorize LAN Engineering to complete all aspects of design and
environmental clearance and enable the City to obligate federal funds for right-of-way
acquisition and construction. Right-of-way acquisition, construction management and the
construction contract will be accomplished by separate contracts.
-
3
'-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT (Continued)
Estimated project costs are as follows:
ITEM OF WORK COST FUNDING SOURCE
1. Environmental Clearance $ 900,000 Measure I and Regional
Circulation Fund
2. a) PS&E Engineering $ 1,100,000 Measure I and Regional
Circulation Fund
b) R/W Engineering $ 100,000 Measure I and Regional
Circulation Fund
3. R/W Acauisition $ 2,200,000 Federal Aid & Local Match
4. Construction Cost $13,900,000 Federal Aid & Local Match
TOTAL $18,200,000
~
Approximately $2,000,000 in federal funds is authorized for right-of-way acqUisItIon and
construction, subject to a reimbursement rate of 88.53%. Additionally, federal omnibus funding
has been requested through the offices of Jerry Lewis and Joe Baca in the amount of $14,560,000
of which 80% will be reimbursable to the City. Even though federal funds are authorized for
specific projects, it is required that the City finance the projects with its own funds and apply for
reimbursement of the federal amount through Caltrans.
This project is also eligible for regional arterial funding under the Measure I extension, which
requires a 32% match from the Regional Circulation System Fee Fund. This funding source will
be used for right-of-way and construction if sufficient funds are not made available from federal
sources.
Although the complex process of environmental and design reviews through Caltrans that are
required to obligate federal funds will require several years to complete, staff believes that LAN
Engineering is the most knowledgeable and dependable firm to push this project through the
process and ready it for construction.
While the project is underfunded, staff is diligently pursuing federal funding for the project as
noted previously. Based on current estimates, funding for right-of-way acquisition will be
needed in 2013 and construction funding will be needed in 2014. Construction of the project
could begin in 2014 and be completed by 2016.
Financial Imoact:
-
Sufficient funding for costs associated with this Amendment No. I in the amount of $800,000 is
available in the FY 2009/10 budget. All costs will be charged to Acct. No. 264-484-5504-7245
"SS04-09 State Street construction from 5th Street to 16th Street". The Consultant has agreed to
discount invoices by 5%. That discount will be used to offset staff costs.
4
'-
'-
-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT (Continued)
The right-of-way cost and a portion of the construction cost for this project will be eligible for
federal reimbursement at the rate of 88.53% and the City's share will be 11.47%, based on
currently authorized federal funding. If federal omnibus funding is obtained, it will be subject to
a reimbursement rate of 80% and the City's share will be 20%. Where matching funds are
required, it will be necessary for the City to budget local road funds, such as Measure I, Gas Tax,
Prop 42, etc., in the fiscal year in which the federal funds are used.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution.
5
1
2
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE
3 EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO.1 TO AGREEMENT WITH LAN ENGINEERING
CORPORATION TO PROVIDE CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES AND
4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR STATE STREET FROM 16TH STREET
TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - EXTEND AND CONSTRUCT ~) LANES OF
5 ROADWAY (1.5 MILES) TO CONNECT STATE STREET TO RANCHO AVENUE
6 (SS04-09).
7
8
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
9
SECTION I. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute Amendment
10 No. I to Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation to Provide Civil Engineering Design
11 Services and Project Management Services for State Street from 16th Street to Foothill Boulevard
12 - Extend and Construct (5) Lanes of Roadway (1.5 miles) to Connect State Street to Rancho
13
Avenue (SS04-09), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
14
reference as fully as though set forth at length.
15
16
17 by the parties, and no party shall be obligated hereunder until the time of such full execution. No
18
19
20
SECTION 2. This Amendment shall not take effect until it is fully signed and executed
oral contracts, amendments, modifications or waivers are intended or authorized and shall not be
implied from any act or course of conduct of any party.
SECTION 3. This resolution is rescinded ifthe parties to the Agreement fail to
21
execute it within sixty (60) days ofthe passage of the resolution.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/1/
fJ - ~n7~
zHl~
1 RESOLUTION... AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO.1 TO
AGREEMENT WITH LAN ENGINEERING CORPORATION TO PROVIDE CIVIL
2 ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
3 FOR STATE STREET FROM 16TH STREET TO FOOTIDLL BOULEVARD -
EXTEND AND CONSTRUCT (4) LANES OF ROADWAY (1.5 MILES) TO CONNECT
4 STATE STREET TO RANCHO AVENUE (SS04-09).
5
6 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
7
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was dilly adopted by the Mayor and
meeting thereof,
held on the
day of
, 2009, by the following vote, to-wit:
8
9 Council Members: A YES
10 ESTRADA
11 BAXTER
12 BRINKER
13 SHORETT
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
14 KELLEY
15
16
OHNSON
MC CAMMACK
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this _day of
,2009.
Patrick J. Morris, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
pproved as to form:
ames F. Penman
26 ity Attorney
27
28
~
2
EXHIBIT "A"
AMENDMENT NO.1
TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This AMENDMENT is made and entered into this day of
2009, by and between the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, California, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and LAN ENGINEERING
CORPORATION, hereinafter referred to as "Consu1tant."
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, on Ju1y 21,2008 the Mayor and Common Council adopted
Resolution No. 2008-281 approving an Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation
for civil engineering design services and project management services for State Street
from 16th Street to Foothill Boulevard - extend and construct (4) lanes of roadway (1.5
miles) to connect State Street to Rancho Avenue (SS04-09) hereinafter referred to as
"Project"; and
B. WHEREAS, At the request of the City, Consultant has provided a
proposal dated July I, 2009 to expand the scope of services and requesting additional
compensation to provide additional environmental, investigation and design services; and
c. WHEREAS, staff concurs that the work for which the additional
compensation is requested was not included in the original Agreement for Professional
Services as amended; and
D. WHEREAS, based on the original scope of services, the time of
performance of the Agreement was established as 12 months after the approval date of
July 21,2008; and
E. WHEREAS, the services of Consultant will be needed past the current
expiration date of the original Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. Section I "Scope of Services" of said Agreement for Professional Services IS
amended to add the following:
· Redesign of the State Street Bridge of the East Branch of Lytle Creek
· Extension of the State Street RCB and replacement of the Foothill Blvd Bridge
· Realignment of Foothill Blvd from Rancho Avenue to 4th Street as result of
Foothill Blvd bridge replacement
-1-
Amendmenl No. I 10 Agreement for Professional Services with LAN Engineering Corporation.
· Supplemental geotechnical studies as result of above bridge work
. Environmental services for NEP NCEQA
. Traffic impact analysis
. Value analysis
. Providing technical staffing for V A study
. Public presentation graphics
The "Scope of Services" for the additional work is described in detail in the attached
proposal from Consultant dated July 1,2009, attached hereto and incorporated herein
as Attachment "A".
2. Section 5 "Compensation" of said Agreement for Professional Services is amended to
add the following:
A. The City shall compensate the Consu1tant for actual costs (including labor costs,
employee benefits, overhead, profit, other direct and indirect costs) incurred by
the Consultant in the performance of work authorized by this Amendment No. I
in the additional not-to-exceed amount of $800,000.00 as indicated in the
Consu1tant's Fee Proposal dated July 6,2009 per Attachment "B" and subject to
a 5% discount as indicated in Attachment "c" both attachments of which are
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
B. The total not-to-exceed compensation to date for this Consultant Agreement is as
follows:
Totals
Amount
$ 827,385.00
$ 800,000.00
$1 627385.00
-2-
Amendment No. I to Agreement for Professional Services with LAN Engineering Corporation.
3. Section 4.1 "Term" of said Agreement for Professional Services is hereby amended to
extend the term of this Agreement to July 31, 2010, unless terminated sooner as
provided herein.
4. All other terms and conditions of said Agreement for Professional approved by
Resolution No. 2008-281 shall remain unchanged.
III
III
-3-
Amendment No. I to Agreement for Professional Services with LAN Engineering Corporation.
AMENDMENT NO.1
TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on
the date first shown above.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
LAN ENGINEERING
CORPORATION
by:
by:
Charles E. McNeely, City Manager
Signature
Print NamelTitle
ATTEST:
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
James F. Penman
City Attorney
By:
?,f
III
III
-4-
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES
FOR
THE EXTENSION OF STATE STREET
FROM SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BLVD. TO 16TH STREET
(Revised 7/1/09)
In accordance with discussions with the City, additional services are needed to complete the
project and are not currently covered by the existing contract.
The previous bridge design the bridge over the East Branch of Lytle Creek was found to no
longer meet the current bridge structural design standard, the Caltrans plan format, and
pedestrian protection standards. Current standards and technologies also potentially provide
for newer alternatives for reducing the structural depth and cost savings.
Foothill Boulevard is of insufficient width to accommodate the necessary lanes at the new
intersection with State Street. Additional services are needed to extend the State Street
Reinforced Box Culvert (RCB) to Foothill Boulevard, including replacing the existing bridge.
The Foothill Boulevard roadway will be widened and realigned from Rancho Avenue to the 4th
Street intersection.
The bridge redesign and RCB extension requires supplemental geotechnical investigations.
The prior environmental work was not completed and has expired and may not meet current
CEQA and NEPA requirements. Environmental services were not part of LAN's scope of
services. The proposed environmental services will prepare the final environmental documents
needed to get environmental clearance for the project.
The traffic impact analysis will supplement prior traffic studies to cover the proposed alternatives
and provide the traffic data necessary for design and completion of the environmental studies.
The current project cost approaches the limit which triggers the need for a Value Analysis
according to Caltrans Federal Funded projects guidelines.
The proposed scope of services includes:
. Design of the bridge to meet current design standards
. Extend State Street RCB to Foothill Blvd. and replace existing bridge, including street
realignment design
. Supplemental geotechnical investigations in support of the bridge redesign and RCB
extension
. Preparation of Public Affairs Presentation Materials
. Preparation of CEQA and NEPA environmental documents
. Preparation of Traffic Impact Analysis
. Value Analysis
ATTACHMENT A
A BRIDGE DESIGN
Bridge Structure Review - This project has two structures 1) State Street Bridge over existing
Lytle Creek Spillway and 2) State Street Box Culvert over Lytle Creek (West Branch). The State
Street Bridge is a brand new structure, and State Street Box Culvert consists of lengthening of
existing structure. The PS&E on these two projects are already complete. We have carefully
reviewed GPs for the both structures, and have noted the following.
a) The plans are currently in Metric. Prior to project going to bid, plans have to be
converted to English Units or Dual Units (with Caltrans Concurrence), and Project
Standard Special Provisions to be updated to be consistent with English Units.
b) The structure design was based on Load Factor Design. Effective October 2006,
Caltrans has required that new structures be designed per Load Resistance Factor
Design.
c) There are changes to Seismic Design Criteria since the time of original design.
The City has requested LAN Engineering to incorporate new LRFD Criteria and Seismic Design
Criteria in to the structure design for these two structures.
A third structure that is now impacted by the project is the existing Foothill Blvd Bridge over
Lytle Creek (West Branch) which must be widened to accommodate widening of Foothill Blvd
and construction of the improved intersection with the State Street Extension. Because of the
very close proximity between the Foothill Blvd Bridge and the proposed State Street Box
Culvert, it is recommended that the existing bridge be replaced and combined with the State
Street structure into a single box culvert.
The following tasks incorporate PS&E updates needed for the State Street Bridge over the Lytle
Creek Spillway and PS&E for one box culvert structure to replace the existing Foothill Blvd
Bridge and carry the State Street Extension over Lytle Creek (West Branch):
1. LAN will review the PS&E package for compliance with latest applicable and relevant
Caltrans Standards and update accordingly.
2. Incorporate AASHTO LRFD Criteria with California Amendments
3. Incorporate latest Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria
4. Convert Plan as applicable to English Units
5. Coordinate with Caltrans regarding replacement of the Foothill Blvd Bridge.
6. Develop Plans for a single culvert to accommodate the Lytle Creek crossing for State
Street and Foothill Blvd.
7. Incorporate latest Caltrans SSPs
8. Update quantities and estimates and provide cost certification
The following are anticipated tasks:
ATTACHMENT A
A. Design
1. LAN shall perform structural analysis and design for the City/Client approved strategy.
Consultant shall adhere as necessary to the requirements of the City and other agencies.
2. Calculations shall conform to Caltrans' criteria, policies, procedures and standards.
Calculations shall be neat and legible with appropriate referencing to published material
used. When computer software is used for performing analysis or design, it shall be clearly
identified with a problem statement, reason for used of the software and how results are
used. Computer output shall be placed in an appendix, pages numbered and relevant input
and output referenced in the main body of the calculations.
3. Calculations shall bear the State of California Registered Professional Engineer
registration seal with the signature, license number and registration certificate expiration
date of the Engineer who is in responsible charge for developing the design.
4. Prepare PS&E for the Bridge Structure and Culvert Structures.
B. Plans
1. Construction details shall be prepared on Caltrans format plan sheets. Caltrans
standard drawings and standard plans shall be incorporated into the contract plans where
applicable.
2. Each plan shall bear the State of California Registered Profession Engineer registration
seal with the signature, license number and registration certificate expiration date of the
Engineer who is in responsible charge for developing the plans.
3. The registered Engineer who prepared the design under the project engineer block shall
sign each plan.
C. Independent Check
1. A qualified engineer who is registered in the State of California shall independently
perform the check of the PS&E package and signoff.
D. Specifications
1. The Consultant shall reference the recently released Caltrans Standard specifications.
2. The Consultant shall edit the Standard Special Provisions (SSPs) specific to this project.
The SSPs shall be prepared in accordance with Caltrans RTL Guide.
3. Specifications shall bear the State of California Registered Professional Engineer
registration seal with the signature, license number and registration certificate expiration
date of the Engineer who is in responsible charge for the development of the SSPs.
ATTACHMENT A
4. A list of contract pay items with item descriptions and item codes, but without quantity
values, shall be included in the front of the special provisions.
E. Estimates / Quantities
1. The Consultant shall prepare quantity calculations for items which are applicable to this
project.
2. Quantities for all contract pay items shall be substantiated by calculations.
Quantity calculations shall be neat and orderly and shall shown all sketches, diagrams
and dimensions necessary to allow them to be independently used by field inspectors
during construction.
3. All quantity calculations shall be independently reviewed. No separate
independent calculations shall be required.
F. Final PS&E
The Consultant shall incorporate comments by the City, other agencies into the PS&E, and
prepare RE pending file and submit the final PS&E.
B STREET DESIGN
Develop additional street realignment design along Foothill Boulevard (SR-66) from Rancho
Avenue to the 4the Street intersection to accommodate widened Foothill Boulevard Bridge.
Foothill Boulevard is within Caltrans right-of-way and will require additional coordination and
review with Caltrans for work within their right-of-way. The current alignment of Foothill
Boulvard/5th Street and 4th Street conflicts with the new State Street intersection and may not be
able to operate safely with the new intersection. The street and intersection must be realigned
to accommodate the new State Street intersection to assure safe movements between State
Street and 4th Street.
C ENVIRONMENTAL QAlQC
The Environmental Manager will provide Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QC/QA) review
prior to documents being submitted to Caltrans. The type of QC/QA review that the
Environmental Manager would provide would be comparable to that of a Caltrans reviewer,
which would ultimately expedite the review process through Caltrans. The Environmental
Manager would ensure that the submittal would be complete and uses appropriate Caltrans
format. The Environmental Manager will attend 12 monthly PDT meetings, with action and
follow up on tasks, through a two year period that is assumed for the environmental process.
D PUBLIC AFFAIRS SUPPORT
Prepare presentation graphics and mount on display boards. Presentation graphics shall
represent plan and typical section views of the proposed street improvements. Sections shall
also show typical section at the bridge crossings and at-grade street sections.
ATTACHMENT A
E GEOTECHNICAL
This proposal is for geotechnical services for the proposed bridge crossing the existing Lytle
Creek Spillway located near the intersection of State Street and Foothill Boulevard and for the
extension of the State Street RCB and replacement of the Foothill Boulevard Bridge.
A previous geotechnical investigation was performed for the subject project by Earth Mechanics,
Inc. (EMI) in 1997. Only the log of test borings (LOTBs) is currently available. The scope of the
investigation performed by EMI is currently not known.
The project lies within the northwest-southeast trending San Jacinto fault zone, which is
identified as a Califomia Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. When a site lies within an
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, an extensive geologic investigation is required. We
propose to perform the geologic investigation in a phased approach with the first phase
described in the below "Geotechnical Tasks." If the investigations determine that additional fault
rupture studies are needed, then the services listed under "Optional Fault Investigations" may
be invoked. The extent of the fault rupture investigations, if needed, is difficult to ascertain until
the initial investigations below are complete. Therefore, the fee in the fee proposal does not
cover the "Optional Fault Investigations." A separate fee proposal will be developed if it is
determined that the "Optional Fault Investigations" are required and the specific scope of
services required is determined.
Geotechnical Tasks
Task 1 - Data Review & Underground Service Alert (USA) Notification
Review geotechnical, project, and underground utility information provided. Assist in obtaining
encroachment permits. Mark proposed boring location in the field and contact USA.
Task 2 - Preliminary Geological Survey
Research to locate suitable aerial photographs; viewing the photographs stereoscopically and
plotting any features that may be related to active faulting (e.g., surface scarps, vegetation
alignments, linear tonal contrasts, etc.) on overlays, transfer the mapped features onto a client-
furnished base map, and preparing a brief letter report describing the study methods and results.
Task 3 - Subsurface Investigation
Drill one boring approximately 80 feet deep near the State Street Bridge over existing Lytle
Creek Spillway and drill one boring approximately 80 feet deep near the State Street Box
Culvert over Lytle Creek (West Branch). Backfill the borings with cement bentonite slurry.
Patch the surface to match existing surrounding.
Task 4 - Laboratory Testing
Perform six (6) moisture content/dry density, six (6) particle size analysis - #200 sieve, Atterberg
limits, four (4) shear strength, one (1) consolidation, one (1) compaction, and two (2) corrosion
tests near the State Street Bridge over existing Lytle Creek Spillway.
ATTACHMENT A
Perform six (6) moisture content/dry density, six (6) particle size analysis - #200 sieve, Atterberg
limits, four (4) shear strength, one (1) consolidation, one (1) compaction, and two (2) corrosion
tests near the State Street Box Culvert over Lytle Creek (West Branch).
Task 5 - Analysis and Reporting
Provide a report with conclusions and recommendations regarding: seismic hazards based on
published maps, earthwork/grading, deep foundation capacity and settlement, lateral earth
pressures, and corrosion potential.
The scope of services specifically excludes any investigation needed to evaluate the presence
or absence of hazardous or toxic materials, including mold, at the site in the soil, surface water,
or groundwater. This scope of work does not include construction services.
The scope of work and fee for geotechnical services are based on the following assumptions:
. Encroachment permits obtained by DY A with the assistance of LAN Engineering
. No-fee access to the site is provided (permit costs paid by others)
. All underground utilities are shown correctly on one set of plans described in Task 1. Note
that sewer and storm drains are not included in the USA inventory
. The site is accessible to truck-mounted field equipment during non-overtime hours.
Prevailing wage rules apply to DY A's subcontractor's field work
. Soil and groundwater are not contaminated
. The boring is backfilled with cement bentonite grout
. Surfaces are patched with rapid set concrete.
. Investigation derived waste (IDW) is spread onsite
. Acceleration Response Spectra (ARS) can be based on typical Caltrans procedures
. A draft report is provided in electronic pdf format.
. The final report will be provided in pdf format. One original and five copies of the report
will be provided upon request.
ODtional Fault Investiaations
If the investigations determine that additional fault rupture studies are needed, then the services
listed under "Optional Fault Investigations" may be invoked. This proposed bridge site lies
within the northwest-southeast trending active San Jacinto fault zone, which is zoned as an
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (APEFZ). The APEFZ is about 1500-feet wide at this
location. Active faults are defined as having displaced geologic units determined to be less than
10,000 to 12,000 years old.
Perform a fault investigation/engineering geologic analysis to determine the location of faults
within the APEFZ and to assess the potential fault displacements associated with these faults.
The overall study has five tasks described briefly below. These are:
1. Review Existing Geologic/Geotechnical/Geophysical Data and Aerial Photographs
2. Perform Site Reconnaissance Field Activities
3. Conduct Site Fault Investigation
4. Prepare Engineering Geology and Fault Report
5. Assess Seismic Fault Rupture Potential
ATTACHMENT A
Task 1: Review Existing Geologic/Geotechnical Data and Aerial Photographs
Geologic and geotechnical data for the site would be reviewed and evaluated. In addition an
aerial photographic analysis of the area around the proposed State Street Bridge would be
performed to identify surface manifestations of past fault movements along individual faults
within the San Jacinto fault APEFZ at this location. The area considered will be within and near
the APEFZ approximately 2000 feet northwest and southeast of the proposed bridge location.
This task would include: (a) research to locate geologic and geotechnical data from readily
available sources, (b) research suitable aerial photographs (as many before human
development as possible) and to purchase up to 3 stereo pairs; (c) viewing the photographs
stereoscopically and plotting any features that may be related to active faulting (e.g., surface
scarps, vegetation alignments, linear tonal contrasts, etc.) on overlays, (d) transferring the
mapped features onto a client-furnished base map, and (e) preparing a brief letter report
describing the study methods and results of the geologic and aerial photograph analysis.
Task 2: Perform Site Reconnaissance Field Activities
Ultimate definition of faults within the bridge area will depend upon the nature of the geologic
deposits and one's ability to define subsurface geologic (or geophysical) unit contacts across
the fault zone in order to assess fault disruption. Before expending a great deal of time and
resources on detailed study, we believe it is necessary to do a reconnaissance-level evaluation
of the bridge area subsurface conditions in order to properly plan the Task 3 Site Fault
Investigation. This reconnaissance would consist of observation in available excavations
(mining operations), up to 2 days of "pothole" excavations at using an excavator to dig to 20+
feet in selected locations, and up to 2 days of seismic refraction and magnetometer profiling.
Seismic would to assess subsurface p-wave seismic velocities and layering across portions of
the site, and the magnetometer could define fault locations (not depths) if basement rocks of
different magnetic susceptibility underlie each side of the fault zone (e.g., Pelon a schist and
Cretaceous rocks). Analysis of this information would allow (a) preliminary geologic and
geotechnical information useful for bridge design and (b) preparation of a preliminary geologic
cross-section within the APEFZ as a basis for selecting the appropriate Task 3 investigation
methods.
Task 3: Conduct Site Fault Investigation
The fault investigation requires the identification of geologic/soil layering and a means to
determine the "age" of the layers in order that fault movement can be identified and recency of
movement can be assessed. The bridge site has young and very young (Holocene-less than
10,000 to 12,000 years old) surface "wash" deposits in an active erosional/depositional
environment (map symbol Qw). Also the layering in these poorly consolidated shallow deposits
is likely indistinct and may not retain evidence of fault lateral fault offset. An objective is to
located deeper, older layers that can be accessed by available investigative methods. Some
such units in the general area are older deposits Qya3, Qya1, Qyes3, Qoed34, and Qoes3
(middle Holocene to late Pleistocene-greater than 10,000 to 12,000 years old).
The appropriate investigation techniques and parameters would be determined after Task 2.
We believe some combination of (a) deep test pits, (b) geotechnical borings, (c) seismic
refraction and seismic reflection geophysical profiles, (d) deep, semi-continuous fault
investigation trenches, and (e) soil/radiometric age determinations would be used. Due to the
presence of the existing concrete channel and spillway it will be necessary to investigate within
ATTACHMENT A
areas where the bridge is proposed, and in areas outside the proposed bridge location to the
northwest and southeast along the trend of the APEFZ. This will involve using these techniques
across nearly the full width of the APEFZ.
Task 4: Prepare Engineering Geology and Fault Report
Following Task 3 a full report of findings and conclusions regarding fault location(s) and possible
age of fault movements will be prepared. This report would include any engineering geology
information and analysis related to geotechnical design studies that have proceeded along with
the previous tasks.
Task 5: Assess Seismic Fault Rupture Potential
In accordance with the process normally applied by Caltrans, a seismic fault rupture
assessment would be made for the San Jacinto fault to determine:
. Earthquake magnitude
. Slip rates and recurrence (return period)
. Type offault (e.g., strike slip, normal)
. Horizontal and vertical components of offset
. Style of faulting (primary or secondary)
. Fault orientation
. Probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis
. Deterministic fault displacement hazard analysis
. Risk analysis
. Design fault rupture movements (horizontal and vertical)
. Concurrence of design fault rupture movements and design ground motions
An appropriate report would be prepared to document these activities. DY A's specialty geologic
consultants will conduct/manage and oversee, respectively, the proposed task efforts.
The extent of these optional Fault Investigation services varies depending on the findings in the
initial geotechnical study. A precise fee estimate can be developed only after the initial findings
are completed.
F ENVIRONMENTAL
The environmental work is for preparation of the CEQA and NEPA environmental documents for
environmental clearance of the project. The project will involve review and approvals by the
City and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans will be the Lead
Agency for the project for preparation of the environmental technical studies and for preparation
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental document. The Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) delegated its responsibilities under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) to Caltrans on July 1, 2007. Therefore, Caltrans will also be the Lead Agency
for compliance with the NEPA. The City will be a Responsible Agency under CEQA.
The tasks identified below outline the work program for environmental clearance of the project
under both CEQA and NEPA. The level of effort is based on (1) preparation of an Initial Study/
Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) leading to a Mitigated Negative Declaration/Finding of No
Significant Impact (MND/FONSI), (2) a schedule of up to 18 months to complete the project, and
ATTACHMENT A
(3) evaluation of up three Build Alternatives and the No Build condition. Should circumstances
arise that indicate the need for a higher-level environmental document (i.e., an Environmental
Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement [EIRlEIS]) or an extension of the project
schedule beyond 18 months, the scope of work and budget would need to be revised
accordingly. The level of effort is also based on preparing the technical analyses listed below in
support of the IS/EA. All documentation will be prepared pursuant to the Caltrans Project
Development Procedures and Workflow Tasks Manuals (including the PR Guidelines), the
Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (SER) Web page, and the City's guidelines for
implementing CEQA. If, after the first drafts of these documents are completed, substantial
effort is required to comply with new revisions to Caltrans guidelines for the technical studies or
the IS/EA, the scope and budget may need to be modified accordingly.
The following items will be required prior to preparation of the technical studies and the
preliminary Draft IS/EA:
. Project plans (digital files) suitable for use as a base for preparation of the Area of Potential
Effects (APE) map for the project. These plans should be on a topo or aerial photo base and
must clearly show the existing and proposed right-of-way and the proposed project
improvements.
. 11" x 17" Caltrans format concept plans (clean PDF file or clean hard copy) for the build
alternatives suitable as an attachment to the technical studies. These plans must clearly
show the existing and proposed right-of-way and the proposed project improvements. The
plans will be required prior to submittal of the first draft technical studies to Caltrans for
review.
. Topographical mapping (digital files) showing existing and proposed right-of-way and
existing and proposed elevations for the entire project site, including all areas within the
APE.
. Rights of entry to all public and private properties.
Task 1: Project Management/Meetings
In addition to project management, this task includes ongoing project team coordination and
attendance at up to 18 Project Development Team (PDT) meetings (assuming LSA will not be
required to attend every monthly PDT meeting for the 18-month schedule) or other meetings.
Two additional meetings are also included: (1) a project kickoff meeting, and (2) an initial field
investigation meeting with the City and Caltrans (these are optional since it is not know at this
time whether these 2 meetings will be required).
Task 2: Project Initiation
This task includes research and investigation activities necessary to develop an understanding
of the proposed project and potential environmental issues. The task may include conducting a
preliminary site survey, gathering preliminary data, and developing a draft project description
and preliminary mapping to define the project footprint of disturbance.
ATTACHMENT A
Task 3: Field Review Meeting and Preliminary Environmental Study (PES)
LSA will discuss with City staff, the consultant project engineer, and Caltrans the project
description and schedule and to develop a mutual understanding of the issues and impacts of
the project. During this task, LSA will review existing information and participate in a field review
of the project site with the consultant project engineer, the City, and Caltrans, For this task, LSA
will prepare a draft Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) form (using the standard Caltrans
form) prior to the site meeting with the consultant project engineer, the City, and Caltrans. The
draft PES will be reviewed and revised if needed, per discussions at the field meeting. The PES
will then be submitted to Caltrans for signature and distribution to the project team. LSA
technical staff (including an archaeologist and biologist) will attend one field meeting (site visit),
as required by Caltrans Local Assistance to discuss possible environmental issues with Caltrans
staff.
Task 4: Environmental Technical Studies
Technical studies for air quality, noise, noise abatement decision report (NADR), water quality,
biology (natural environment study report), paleontological resources, and cultural resources will
be prepared to provide the basis for the conclusions in the IS/EA. The scope of work includes
technical studies as optional items to include a visual resources impact analysis, a community
impact analysis and a relocation study. Optional subtasks under biological resources are
provided for small mammal trapping, Endangered Species Act Consultation, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and Califomia Department of Fish and Game jurisdictional delineation, and
jurisdictional waters permitting. The technical studies listed below will be used as resource
documents for preparation of the IS/EA. The technical studies will evaluate the potential
environmental impact of up to three Build Alternatives and the No Build condition.
This scope and budget are based on three rounds of Caltrans review for the draft technical
studies. The first round of review is for major comments, and the second and third rounds are
for minor cleanup comments (no new comments requiring substantial revisions). If the concept
plans for the project are revised after the analysis for the technical studies is complete, new
analysis based on the revised plans may be required, and the scope and budget may need to
be modified accordingly.
Task 4.1: Air Quality Analysis. LSA will prepare an Air Quality Analysis for the project in
accordance with the Caltrans Transportation Project Level Carbon Monoxide (CO) Protocol, the
EPA's fugitive dust conformity rule, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) CEQA Handbook air quality guidelines. LSA will conduct the screening analyses
specified in the CO protocol and, if required, conduct CALlNE4 modeling for CO hot spots for up
to 20 receptor locations for the Existing, Future No Build, and each of the Build Alternatives.
LSA will evaluate the proposed project's impacts to long-term particulate matter concentrations
(PM2s and PM,.) and mobile source air toxics (MSAT) using the Transportation Conformity
Guidance for Qualitative Hot-spot Analysis in PM2s and PM,. Nonattainment and Maintenance
Areas (EPA, March 2006) and the Interim Guidelines on Air Toxic Ana/ysis in NEPA Documents
(FHWA, February 2006). In addition, the proposed project's impact on global warming and
climate change will be discussed.
In addition to the air quality analysis, LSA will prepare the "Conformity Analysis Documentation
for Project-Level Conformity Determinations in Metropolitan NonattainmentlMaintenance Areas"
required for NEPA delegation.
ATTACHMENT A
Task 4.2: Noise Analysis. LSA will prepare a noise impact analysis consistent with the
Caltrans Noise Analysis Protocol (August 2006) and Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS) to
address traffic noise impacts on noise-sensitive uses, such as existing and approved future
residential areas located adjacent to the proposed project. Noise standards regulating noise
impacts, including the Noise Abatement Criteria (NAG) and applicable local noise ordinances,
will be discussed for land uses located adjacent to the project. The areas with potential future
traffic noise impacts will be identified using land use information, aerial photographs, and field
reconnaissance. A discussion of any existing sensitive uses and approved future residences in
the project vicinity will be included.
Ambient noise level measurements will be conducted to establish the existing noise
environment at representative noise-sensitive land uses along State Street within the project
area. Short-term (15-minute) noise level measurements will be made at up to 9 locations with
concurrent traffic counts to document the existing noise environment and to calibrate the traffic
noise model. In addition, one classroom building will be evaluated with one interior and exterior
noise level measurement. Observations of other noise sources, barriers, terrains, building
heights, and other site specific information will be noted during each measurement period.
Short-term noise impacts from construction sources will be analyzed based on the equipment
expected to be used, length of a specific construction task, equipment power type (gasoline or
diesel engine), horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended noise emission levels will be used for
the construction equipment. The construction noise impact will be evaluated in terms of
maximum levels (Lmax) and the frequency of occurrence at adjacent noise-sensitive locations.
Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of the area and the City's Noise
Ordinance specifications.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Model (TNM) version 2.5 will be
used to evaluate the traffic noise levels associated with the Existing, Future No Build, and
Future Build. Model input data include peak hour traffic volumes, vehicle mix among autos,
medium and heavy trucks, vehicle speeds, ground attenuation factors, and roadway
configurations. Existing roadway traffic noise will be calculated as baseline conditions, using
concurrent traffic counts obtained during ambient noise level measurement. The future traffic
conditions will assume either the worst-case traffic condition or the projected traffic volumes
provided in the traffic study.
Noise abatement measures (sound barriers) designed to reduce long-term traffic noise impacts
by 5 dBA or more, as required to be feasible, will be evaluated. A reasonable allowance per
residence and total reasonable allowance per residence will be calculated for each sound
barrier.
Task 4.3: Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR). If feasible sound barriers were
identified in the Noise Study Report (NSR), LSA will prepare a NADR, as defined in the Caltrans
Noise Analysis Protocol (August 2006) upon receipt of the estimated sound barrier construction
cost and non-acoustical information related to feasibility from the project engineer. The report
will summarize the preliminary reasonableness determination from the noise study report,
present the engineer's cost estimate for the evaluated abatement, evaluation of non-acoustical
factors related to feasibility, preliminary noise abatement decision, and secondary effects of
abatement (impacts on cultural resources, scenic views, hazardous materials, and biology). LSA
will prepare the NADR consistent with the District report guidelines with the best information
available.
ATTACHMENT A
Task 4.3.1 Introduction. LSA will include a brief description of noise abatement
assessment requirements, the purpose of the NADR, a brief description of the project
alternatives, and the identification of affected land uses. The general land uses within
the project area will be discussed, including existing uses and uses that are planned,
designed, and programmed as defined in the Protocol. The report will also identify noise-
sensitive land uses associated with outdoor frequent human use areas, consistent with
the Noise Analysis.
Task 4.3.2 Results of the Noise Analysis. The report will summarize key information
presented in the Noise Analysis. This key information will include the identification of
locations where noise impacts are predicted to occur, identification of locations for which
noise abatement was evaluated, a description of evaluated noise abatement, and a table
summarizing acoustical feasibility, along with the number of benefited receivers and
reasonable allowances.
Task 4.3.3 Preliminary Noise Abatement Decision. The NADR will present a
summary of the key information to be used in making the preliminary noise abatement
decision, which includes acoustical feasibility, number of benefited residences, total
reasonableness allowance, the engineer's cost estimate for the abatement, and a
comparison of cost versus allowance. Nonacoustical factors will also be evaluated under
the preliminary noise abatement decision. These factors include geometric standards
(minimum sight distances), safety, maintenance, security, geotechnical considerations,
and utility relocations.
Task 4.3.4 Preliminary Recommendation and Decision. The recommended barrier
selected by the PDT will be presented in the report. Several factors considering the
recommendation include breaking the line-of-sight between the receiver and the 11.5-
foot- (ft) high truck exhaust stack, the absolute noise level, the number of benefited
receivers, the cost per benefited receiver, the degree of noise reduction, and a 15-year
minimum life cycle.
Task 4.3.5 Secondary Effects of Abatement. Secondary effects on cultural resources,
scenic views, hazardous materials, biology, and other resources will be discussed and
addressed in the NADR. The best information available will be compiled from relevant
environmental studies and technical specialists to address secondary effects on cultural
resources, scenic views, hazardous materials, biology, and other resources.
Task 4.3.6 Report Preparation and Response to Comments. LSA will prepare a
NADR for the proposed project. Also, LSA will respond to review comments and revise
the report accordingly. It is anticipated that the report will require up to two rounds of
review.
Task 4.3.7 Meetings/Public Hearings. It is anticipated that LSA noise staff will not be
required to attend any team meetings andlor public hearings related to processing the
proposed project. The cost of attending such meetings is therefore not included in this
proposal. If requested, meeting attendance will be provided on a time-and-materials
basis.
ATTACHMENT A
Task 4.4: Water Quality Assessment Report.
Task 4.4.1 Research. LSA will conduct research on design pollution prevention best
management practices (BMPs), construction site BMPs, and treatment BMPs that are
applicable to the project alternatives per the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks
Project Planning and Design Guide. Information from the Storm Water Data Report
(SWDR), to be provided by the project engineer, will be incorporated into the WQAR.
Information to be obtained from the SWDR includes, but is not limited to, proposed
BMPs, the disturbed soil area, and new impervious surface area.
Task 4.4.2 Report Preparation. LSA will prepare a Water Quality Assessment Report
(WQAR) for the project that discusses watershed characteristics, groundwater hydrology,
regulatory requirements, pollutants of concern, and receiving waters conditions,
objectives, and beneficial uses. The project's potential impact on water quality will be
evaluated and mitigation measures necessary to prevent adverse water quality impacts
will be identified.
Upon the completion of the WQAR described above, LSA will prepare and submit a Draft
WQAR for the City's review and comments. LSA will make the necessary revisions to
the Draft WQAR and will prepare the WQAR for Caltrans review. LSA will provide a
preprint version of the WQAR to the City for a limited final review prior to submitting it to
Caltrans for review and comment. The purpose of this review will be to verify that the
City is satisfied with the new and revised text per its comments. At this point, no
substantive changes to technical analyses or conclusions are provided in order to
maintain the schedule and/or budget.
LSA will reproduce up to six hard copies of the WQAR for Caltrans review. This scope
and budget assumes no more than two rounds of Caltrans review and no more than
sixteen hours of revision time will be required. LSA will reproduce up to six hard copies
of the WQAR for each Caltrans review.
Task 4.4.3 Consultation and Coordination. Consultation and coordination may be
required with the applicant, project team, and involved regulatory agencies. We have
assumed this coordination will take place primarily by telephone, fax, and mail. The
proposed schedule and cost estimate do not include attendance at any meetings.
Task 4.5: (Biological) Natural Environment Study (NES)
Task 4.5.1: Literature and Database Search. LSA will determine the existence or
potential occurrence of sensitive plant and animal species within and in the vicinity of the
project area (where such species could be affected by project activities or where
protocol surveys need to be extended within limits agreed upon by any regulatory
agency). LSA will accomplish this by conducting a review of federal and state lists of
sensitive species and current database records, including the California Natural Diversity
Data Base (California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG), 2008), the California
Native Plant Society's E/ectronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of
California (Skinner et al. 2004), and other environmental reports (if found).
Task 4.5.2: USFWS ListedlSensitive Species Coordination Letter. In accordance
with Caltrans guidelines, LSA will submit a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) requesting a list of threatened and endangered species known from the
ATTACHMENT A
project area. The results of the records search will be summarized in a table and
included in the NES including any critical habitats that have the potential to be affected
by the proposed project.
Task 4.5.3: Prepare NES Report. LSA will prepare an NES report suitable for use in
NEPA and CEQA review. The report will be prepared in accordance with the modified
(October 2005) version of the Caltrans Style Guide for Environmental Documents or a
more current revision for projects subject to review by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA). The NES will contain the following detail:
. A preliminary list of sensitive elements that may be affected by the project. The list
will be developed from literature sources (i.e., California Natural Diversity Data Base,
California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants
of California, and other environmental reports) and through coordination with
resource agencies.
. A list of species and critical habitats potentially affected by the project based on a
request letter to the USFWS.
. Assessment of habitat conditions to determine if focused burrowing owl surveys will
be required.
. Biological inventory, description of biological resources, habitat and sensitive species
location maps, assessment of migration corridors, survey methodologies, results of
presence/absence surveys, potential wetlandslwaters of the U.S.lstreambeds of the
CDFG, maps, tables, photographs, and appendices.
. Determine project impacts to biological resources and potential mitigation measures
for project team's review using the results of the literature review, field surveys, and
agency coordination. LSA will coordinate with the project development team to
identify appropriate mitigation measures.
. LSA will coordinate with the project team to identify appropriate mitigation measures.
Mitigation requirements shall be pre-approved by the project team prior to
incorporating such mitigation into the draft and final NES.
. An LSA senior biologist will be available to attend a total of four staff/coordination
meetings.
The proposed scope of services includes preparation of a draft NES to be reviewed by
the City of San Bernardino (City) and Caltrans. LSA will prepare and distribute up to six
copies of the NES for two review cycles and will respond to comments and update the
NES as needed for completion of each cycle.
Task 4.5.4: Sensitive Species Habitat Assessment
Based on a preliminary database search, the following federal and state listed and
CDFG species of special concern surveys are likely to be required. LSA will conduct a
habitat assessment to determine the need for additional surveys for the listed and
sensitive species below.
. San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys meniami parvus) (Federal Endangered
Species);
. Slender-horned spineflower (DoeJecahema leptoceras) (Federal and State
Endangered Species);
ATTACHMENT A
. Santa Ana River woollystar (Eriast/1/m densifolium ssp. sancto/1/m) (Federal and
State Endangered Species); and
. Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) (State Species of Special Concern).
If it is determined that additional surveys are necessary, LSA will notify the City once the
determination is made. Only focused surveys for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat
(SBKR) are included in this scope of services (as an optional task). If needed, LSA is
available to conduct additional focused species surveys at an additional cost.
Task 4.5.5: Small Mammal Trapping (Optional)
The proposed project is located outside the designated critical habitat for the SBKR
(finalized October 18, 2008). LSA will conduct small mammal trapping within suitable
habitat within the project area, especially adjacent to Lytle Creek Wash near Baseline
Road, in order to determine if threatened or endangered small mammal species,
including SBKR, are present on the site. LSA will document the survey results in a
technical report that will be suitable for use by the USFWS and the CDFG (if necessary).
The focused survey will consist of a small mammal trapping survey and preparation of a
focused survey report. The survey will determine whether the SBKR is present or absent
on the project site. The trapping effort will consist of five consecutive nights of trapping
and will be conducted in accordance with all permit conditions. The SBKR is an
endangered species as listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act. As part of the
assessment, all captured small mammals will be identified and released unharmed; LSA
will also note other observed plants and animals. Per permit conditions, inclement
weather or nighttime temperatures below 50 degrees Fahrenheit may extend the
trapping beyond the five-night period.
The small mammal trapping survey will be performed by an LSA biologist who is
permitted by the USFWS to capture the SBKR. Traps will be set up at dusk and checked
at midnight and dawn. LSA has previously experienced vandalism with traps in this
vicinity along Lytle Creek. Therefore, traps will be set up each evening and taken down
each morning to reduce the potential for vandalism. Additionally, due to the high-risk
location of the project and the high-risk time of day for conducting the trapping, a team of
two or three biologists will work together at all times on site. It is assumed that trapping
efforts will be conducted in one five-night trapping session. If inclement weather arises or
the USFWS requires additional traps that cannot be accommodated during the five-night
trapping efforts, additional budget may be required.
Pursuant to the permit requirements, LSA must provide the following information to the
USFWS:
. In advance of the trapping survey, details regarding the site location that will be
trapped;
. Authorization (or denial) from the properly owner for the USFWS to enter the
properly during trapping activities;
. Notification within 48 hours of the capture of any threatened or endangered species;
. A trapping survey report within 30 days of completion of the surveys; and
. A summary of trapping results as part of the biological assessment report.
ATTACHMENT A
Upon completion of the focused survey, LSA will prepare a draft letter report
documenting the survey results and will include graphics showing the site location in a
USGS 7.5' Quadrangle and photographs of the existing site conditions. One draft letter
report will be submitted to the City for review and comment. Comments will be
incorporated into a final letter report and copies will be submitted to the City and the
USFWS.
Consultation and coordination may be required with the applicant, project team, and
involved regulatory agencies. We have assumed this coordination will take place by
telephone, fax, and mail. The proposed scope and bUdget does not include attendance
at any meetings.
Task 4.5.6: Endangered Species Act Consultation (Optional)
This task is not expected to be required due to the disturbed condition of the vegetation
and soils within the project site but is included as background information only. Federal
Endangered Species Act (FESA) Section 7 Consultation requires federal agencies to
consult with the USFWS on proposed actions that may affect threatened or endangered
species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat. Section 7
also requires federal agencies to confer with the USFWS if the agency determines that
the action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitat. This
consultation may take place in two steps:
. Informal consultation is a process that includes all discussions, correspondence, etc.
between the USFWS and the federal agency or a designated non-federal
representative. Informal consultation is designed to assist the involved agencies in
determining whether an action may affect a listed species. If the USFWS concurs
that an action is not likely to adversely affect a listed species, Section 7 consultation
ends. During informal consultation, the USFWS may suggest modifications to the
action that the federal agency and/or permittee could make to avoid the likelihood of
adverse effect.
. If the project is likely to adversely affect a listed species, formal consultation between
the USFWS and the federal agency is initiated. During formal consultation, the
USFWS evaluates information relating to potential project effects on the listed
species. At the conclusion of this evaluation, the USFWS formulates a Biological
Opinion (BO) as to whether the project is likely to jeopardize the continued existence
of the listed species. If a "jeopardy opinion" is issued, the USFWS is to include
reasonable and prudent alternatives to the federal action. In the case of a "no
jeopardy opinion" (or with the implementation of reasonable and prudent
alternatives), the USFWS may also issue an "incidental take" statement, which
allows the incidental take of a listed species in accordance with terms and conditions
specified in the BO.
. LSA recommends that the initial report be used as a basis for initial coordination
between the project team and the USFWS to obtain tentative concurrence on key
FESA issues as they relate to the proposed project. The issues to be addressed will
be the identification of the action area, project description, potential effects of
proposed project on subject species, and appropriate conservation (mitigation)
measures. LSA will coordinate the meeting, prepare the agenda, distribute relevant
ATTACHMENT A
information in advance of the meeting, and prepare minutes documenting the
meeting results. It is expected that the staff from the City of San Bernardino,
Caltrans, the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA), and LSA will participate in
the initial coordination.
LSA will prepare a Biological Assessment (BA) in accordance with USFWS guidelines.
The BA will be based on the results of the initial coordination and will incorporate
relevant information from the literature review. The BA will follow standard Caltrans
formatting for such documents and will include:
. A description of the action being considered and identification of the action area.
. A description of any listed species or critical habitat that may be directly or indirectly
affected by the action.
. An evaluation of direct, indirect, and cumulative project effects on any listed species
or critical habitat.
. Identification of efforts to avoid or minimize project effects.
. A description of compensatory mitigation measures that have been approved by the
PM/PDT members and the FHWA. If such measures have not been approved by all
parties, a memorandum describing recommended measures will be attached to the
BA.
Graphics will be included in the report, showing the site location, vegetation and habitat
distribution, and any sensitive species sightings. In addition, relevant reports, including
any environmental documents, biological reports, and any other relevant studies or other
information available on the action, the affected listed species, or critical habitat will be
appended to the report.
LSA will prepare a "screencheck" version of the BA for review. Upon receipt of
comments, LSA will make revisions as needed and prepare a draft BA for submittal to
Caltrans and the FHWA. Upon receipt of comments from the FHWA, LSA will prepare a
final BA suitable for the FHWA to submit to the USFWS. LSA will await receipt of
comments from all respective participants before completing revisions to any of the
report versions.
This proposal does not include preparation of the Environmental Assessment (EA) that
is required as part of a Section 7 Consultation. It is standard practice for the USFWS to
prepare the required EA and we anticipate that such practice will be followed for the
project.
For dual listed species, the project must also obtain a California Endangered Species
Act (CESA) permit. This process is completed after the USFWS has issued the FESA
permit (BO). Typically, this is a review by the CDFG for compliance with the state
regulations.
Task 4.5.7: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and California Department of Fish and
Game Jurisdictional Delineation (Optional)
Under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) , the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (ACOE) regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the
ATTACHMENT A
United States, including wetlands. Waters of the United States include essentially any
drainage course with defined banks or other evidence of flow of water. The CDFG,
through provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, is empowered to issue
agreements for any alteration of a river, stream, or lake. Streams (and rivers) are defined
by the presence of a channel bed and banks, and at least an intermittent flow of surface
or sub-surface water.
The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) must issue a Water Quality
Certification (pursuant to the CWA Section 401) for any project, which is also subject to
ACOE jurisdiction under CWA Section 404.
Wetlands are afforded special emphasis under both the state and federal programs.
Wetlands are considered by the ACOE and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to be "special aquatic sites." Both EPA and ACOE have strict policies regarding
mitigation of wetland areas. Because of the significance of this issue, a precise and
accurate jurisdictional determination is critical.
A focused wetland delineation will be completed according to the September 2008
Regiona/ Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West
Region (Version 2.0), the currently accepted methodology. We anticipate that a routine
delineation, tailored to the site characteristics, will be adequate. A jurisdictional "waters
of the U.S." determination will also be completed according to the current ACOE
standards. Finally, the extent of any streambed and associated riparian areas subject to
review by CDFG under Section 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and Game Code will
be determined.
The results of the delineation will be presented in a detailed report that will include
mapping of any wetland and jurisdictional areas. Please note the results of the
determination are subject to verification by the ACOE, RWQCB, and CDFG.
This report will define the project constraints associated with non-wetland waters,
wetlands, and riparian habitat. Our approach will be to provide appropriate technical
documentation for use in any required regulatory compliance procedure. The respective
agencies require that a wetland delineation be submitted along with the permit
applications required to obtain authorization for work in waters of the U.S.lstreambeds of
the CDFG.
A completed jurisdictional delineation and grading plan would be necessary to properly
scope and estimate the cost of permitting services for the project.
Task 4.5.8: Jurisdictional Waters Permitting (Optional)
This scope of work assumes that the project will fall within the criteria for a Nationwide
Permit and not require an Individual CWA Section 404 permit. The permits listed below
may be required for construction of the proposed project:
. Section 404 CWA permit from the ACOE for dredge or fill material. (The project sites
will likely be eligible for a nationwide permit.)
. Section 401 CWA certification from the RWQCB.
. Section 1600 et seq. Fish and Game Code agreement from the CDFG.
ATTACHMENT A
A conceptual and final Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) may be needed
and is included in this scope. The scope of services for the permits listed above is
described in further detail below.
Task 4.5.8.1: Section 404 (Optional). Obtaining authorization under Section 404 of the
CWA requires that the applicant prepare a notification requesting authorization for fill of
jurisdictional waters. This proposal is based on one or more nationwide permits that may
be required for the construction activities associated with the project. LSA will prepare
and submit a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) to the ACOE that includes the
following information and attachments:
. Introductory cover letter.
. A detailed project description, including project background.
. A discussion, with supporting figures, of existing and/or potential biological
resources, project impacts to ACOE jurisdictional areas, and mitigation measures to
compensate for proposed impacts.
. A detailed description of impact minimization measures.
. A discussion of cultural resource documentation and requirements.
. Conceptual mitigation options based on ACOE guidelines and available information.
(These options will include conceptual information on how on-site impacts may be
mitigated to replace jurisdictional areas that will be lost. A final mitigation and
monitoring plan is included in this scope of work.)
. A complete set of project site construction plans/drawings.
. A copy of the jurisdictional delineation report.
. A copy of the Section 401 and 1600 et seq. permit applications.
Task 4.5.8.2: Section 401 Certification (Optional). In order to issue authorization for
fill of waters under Section 404 of the CWA, the ACOE is required to ensure that the
RWQCB has issued a certification of water quality or waste discharge requirements in
compliance with Section 401 of the CWA. LSA will prepare and submit a request for
Water Quality Certification to the RWQCB. The request letter will include the following
information and attachments:
. Introductory cover letter.
. A completed Section 401 Water Quality Certification Form, including the required
supplemental text and figures.
. An assessment of water quality impacts addressing types of fill material to be
discharged, impacts to beneficial uses of the water body, and any expected water
diversions.
. Conceptual mitigation options based on ACOE guidelines and available information.
. A complete set of project site construction plans/drawings.
. A copy ofthe Jurisdictional Delineation Report.
. A copy of the Section 404 and 1602 permit applications.
ATTACHMENT A
Task 4.5.8.3: Streambed Alteration Agreement (Optional). The CDFG is empowered
to issue agreements for any alteration of a river, stream, or lake where fish or wildlife
resources may be adversely affected. In order to obtain a Streambed Alteration
Agreement (SAA), LSA will prepare and submit a Notification of Streambed Alteration to
the CDFG. The notification letter will include the following information and attachments:
. Introductory cover letter.
. A discussion (with supporting figures) of existing and/or potential biological
resources, project impacts to the CDFG jurisdictional area, and mitigation measures
to compensate for proposed impacts.
. A completed Notification Form.
. Conceptual mitigation options based on ACOE guidelines and available information.
A complete set of project site construction plans/drawings.
. A copy of the Jurisdictional Delineation Report.
. A copy of the Section 404 and 401 permit applications.
Task 4.5.8.4: Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (Optional). The HMMP will be
suitable for submittal to the CDFG, ACOE, and RWQCB to satisfy permit requirements.
LSA will prepare an HMMP that will address proposed mitigation and habitat restoration
in the project sites. The HMMP will include sections addressing Restoration Project
Description, Goal of Mitigation, Success Criteria, Proposed Mitigation Sites,
Implementation Plan, Monitoring Plan, Maintenance Plan, Completion of Mitigation and
Dedication of Conservation Easement, Long-Term Management and Maintenance, and
Contingency Measures.
Task 4.5.8.5: Project Team Review/Revisions (Optional). One draft copy of each
permit application package will be provided to the City for review. Upon approval by the
City, LSA will send the final permit application packages to the ACOE, RWQCB, and
CDFG. Two copies of the final permit application packages also will be provided to the
City.
Task 4.5.8.6: Follow-Up Coordination (Optional). Consultation and coordination may
be required with the City, Caltrans, and the involved regulatory agencies during review of
application materials. Following submittal of the applications, LSA will coordinate with
the involved regulatory agencies to respond to agency questions and submit any
additional information that may be requested. We have assumed that coordination will
take place primarily by telephone, fax, and mail.
During this process, LSA will coordinate closely with the City with regard to any agency
concerns, questions, or request for additional materials that may arise.
Typically, the resource agencies request at least one meeting on site during
implementation of the permitting process. If the jurisdictional delineation of waters has
not been approved by the agencies, the site meeting should include a determination of
jurisdiction by the agencies. During the negotiation process, it is critical that there is
general consensus that the mitigation measures to be proposed will be acceptable to the
resource agencies, the City, and Caltrans.
ATTACHMENT A
Based upon LSA's current knowledge of the project, up to one field meeting with agency
personnel is anticipated. Additionally, this proposal includes coordination of the meeting
and telephone conversations with agency personnel during the mitigation measures and
ratio negotiations process.
Permit Processing Times. Anticipated agency processing time following submittal of
complete applications is approximately:
. RWQCB 6 to 8 months.
. CDFG 6 to 8 months.
. ACOE 8 to 12 months.
Task 4.6 Cultural Resources. All cultural resource efforts will be completed in compliance with
CEQA and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and will follow the
requirements set forth in the Caltrans Environmenta/ Handbook Volume II, Cultural Resources
and the Programmatic Agreement among the Federal Highway Administration, the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the
California Department of Transportation Regarding Compliance with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act, as it Pertains to the Administration of the Federa/-aid Highway
Program in California (Programmatic Agreement). The scope of this proposal stipulates that:
. the APE Map will be prepared by LAN with collaboration between LSA, the City of San
Bernardino, and Caltrans;
. no more than 11 cultural resources will be will be identified, documented, and evaluated (10
historical resources and one archaeological site);
. there is no historic district within the indirect or direct APE; and
. there will be no archaeological Extended Phase I, Phase II Test Excavation (archaeological
evaluation) or a finding of effect (FOE) document prepared for this project.
Task 4.6.1 Caltrans APE Map Coordination. LSA will coordinate the production of the
project Study Area and/or area of potential effects (APE) map with Caltrans and the
engineering team. However, the engineering team will be responsible for preparing the APE
Map. This scope of work does not include the preparation of an APE map by LSA. This
proposal stipulates that an APE map will be submitted and there will be one round of
response to comments.
Task 4.6.2 Research. A cultural resource records search will be conducted at the San
Bernardino Archaeological Information Center (SBAIC), located at the San Bernardino
County Museum, Redlands. The SBAIC is the state-designated repository for records
concerning cultural resources in San Bernardino County. The records search will provide
information on known cultural resources and on previous cultural resources investigations
within a one-mile radius of the project area. Data sources that will be consulted at the
SBAIC include archaeological site and artifact records, historic maps, reports from previous
studies, and the state's Historic Resource Inventory (HRI) for San Bernardino County, which
contains listings for National Register of Historic Places (National Register), California
Register of Historical Resources (California Register), California Historical Landmarks (CHL),
and California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI).
ATTACHMENT A
LSA will complete research at various repositories and archives for the properties within the
Area of Potential Effects (APE) to determine built dates for any buildings and structures. In
addition, LSA will conduct research that will lead to the preparation of a historic context and
recommendation of eligibility for the National and California Registers. Local historical
societies and similar groups will also be consulted as part of this process. LSA stipulates
that research will be conducted for up to 11 cultural resources. This is based on preliminary
map review and research. If additional cultural resources are identified within the APE,
additional research may be required that is not included here.
Task 4.6.3 Coordination/Consultation with Client, City, Caltrans, Native Americans
and Other Parties. LSA will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).
The NAHC will provide a list of Native American groups to contact regarding this project.
LSA will coordinate with Caltrans to consult with the tribes. LSA will also consult with other
interested parties, including non-federally recognized Native American groups and local
historical and archaeological societies. With Caltrans' approval LSA will contact up to 15
groups. LSA will contact each group via certified mail. After 30 days LSA will follow up with
those groups that have not commented, via telephone. LSA will attempt to contact each
group up to 2 times. LSA will document all efforts to consult with each group. Additional
budget may be required to address issues or concerns raised by any tribes.
In addition LSA will plan to attend one meeting with the project team. Additional coordination
will be via telephone and electronic mail.
Task 4.6.4 Field Survey/DPR Forms. LSA will conduct a systematic field survey of
portions of the APE that are not obscured by asphalt/concrete. The ground surface will be
visually examined by an archaeologist for evidence of prehistoric (Native American) or
historic (non-Native American) archaeological materials. An architectural historian will
survey the project built environment historic resources (e.g., buildings, bridges, power lines,
railroads, mines, or canals). To meet state standards, any previously unrecorded resources
identified during the survey will be recorded on State of California DPR 523 forms. A
maximum of 11 DPR 523 forms will be completed by LSA; any additional DPR 523 forms will
require additional bUdget.
Task 4.6.5 Report. LSA will prepare a Caltrans format Historic Properly Survey Report
(HPSR) Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER), and an Archaeological Survey
Report (ASR) according to Caltrans specifications. The reports will describe: 1) the results of
Native American Consultation, 2) research and field methods used in identifying cultural
resources, 3) the archaeological and historic resources identified in the project vicinity, 4)
the historic contexts based on the types of cultural resources identified, and 5) the potential
of the project to adversely impact any archaeological or historic resources. If any prehistoric
or historic archaeological resources are located within the APE, additional tasks may be
required. If recommendations for further studies are warranted, LSA will contact LAN
immediately to discuss the issue. This scope of work allows for one round of client comment
and one round of Caltrans comments.
Deliverables. LSA will provide the LAN with up to ten (10) copies of Draft HPSR, Draft
HRER, and Draft ASR, and five (5) copies of the Final HPSR, Final HRER, and Final ASR.
ATTACHMENT A
Task 4.7 Paleontological Resources.
The Paleontological Study will be completed based on the Caltrans Standard Environmental
Reference (SER) and recent experience with District 8.
Task 4.7.1 Research. Paleontological resource record searches will be requested from
the San Bernardino County Museum, Division of Earth Science, Redlands; the Los
Angeles County Museum of natural History, and the Riverside Metropolitan Museum,
California. The records search may provide information on known paleontological
resources within a one-mile radius of the project area. The paleontological resource
literature review will be conducted with available maps and references to determine if
significant nonrenewable fossil specimens are known from sediments on or around the
project parcels.
LSA will review both geologic mapping in the project area and results of the geotechnical
report for the project. This geologic data may be used in the paleontological evaluation
report to indicate the potential for subsurface paleontological resources.
Task 4.7.2 Field Survey/Locality Forms. LSA will conduct a systematic paleontological
field survey of portions of the project that are not obscured by asphalt or concrete. The
ground surface will be visually examined for evidence of paleontological resources, or
outcrops of sedimentary formations that the research indicates have potential to contain
significant, nonrenewable paleontological resources. Paleontological resources will be
recorded on fossil locality forms. For the purpose of this proposal, LSA stipulates that no
resources will be identified. If resources are identified, additional budget will be required
for their documentation.
Task 4.7.3 Report. LSA will also prepare a combined Paleontological Identification
Report (PIR), and a Paleontological Evaluation Report (PER) for paleontological
resources according to Caltrans specifications. If any paleontological resources are
located within the project, additional tasks may be required. If recommendations for
further studies are warranted, LSA will contact the client immediately. This scope of work
allows for response to one round of client comments and one round of Caltrans
comments.
Deliverables. LSA will provide the client with up to six (6) copies of Draft PIR/PER; and
six (6) copies of the Final PIR/PER.
Task 4.8: Visua"mpact Assessment (optional)
LSA will prepare a visual resources report that evaluates the visual impact of the project
improvements from several nearby viewpoints. This assessment shall describe the existing
visual characteristics of the area involving the State Street realignment and vicinity, and any
significant visual resources. The potential visual impacts from project construction and use of
the new bridge will be evaluated through the use of ground level photographs from viewpoints
near the project site and up to three view simulations of the project improvements. The
improvements to be shown in the view simulations will be determined by LSA in coordination
with LAN and the City. View simulations will be reviewed and approved by the PDT prior to
preparation of the Draft VIA. Visual conditions and project impacts will be discussed from a
ATTACHMENT A
qualitative perspective. Mitigation measures shall be recommended, if necessary, to reduce any
significant visual impacts.
Deliverables. LSA will provide the client with up to eight (8) copies of the Draft VIA; and eight
(8) copies of the Final VIA.
Task 4.9: Community Impact Assessment (optional)
LSA will prepare a Community Impact Assessment (CIA) in accordance with the guidelines
found in the FHWA Technical Advisory T6640.8A and Caltrans Community Impact Assessment
Handbook (1997). The CIA will evaluate the proposed project's socioeconomic impacts utilizing
current demographics and current assessor parcel information and complying with guidelines
provided in the Caltrans Community Impact Assessment Handbook (June 1997).
LSA will perform the following tasks to assess the socioeconomic impacts resulting from the
project within the City of San Bernardino:
1. The discussion of the social characteristics will include existing and projected population
and the relevant demographic characteristics of the project area, including the following:
. Ethnic group
. Age
. Income (U.S. Census 1990)
. Low-mobility status (i.e., elderly and/or handicapped)
This information will be drawn from the latest available demographic and socioeconomic
information from federal, State, regional, and local sources (e.g., U.S. Census 2000 and
current SCAG projections). Income projections will be taken from 1990 census data.
2. Impacts associated with the following topics will be addressed in the socioeconomic
report:
. Defined communities (communities recognized by name and practice) and
immediate neighborhoods in the area affected by the grade separation.
. Facilities in the immediate neighborhoods that are available to the young, elderly,
and handicapped will be identified and mapped because of the restricted mobility of
such groups.
. Community and neighborhood cohesion.
. Any current substantial population changes that have occurred in ethnic, elderly,
poor, or other demographic groups within the area affected by the project.
. Population grow1h policies of the local jurisdictions.
. The percentage of the population groups will be compared to the characteristics for
subregional areas of San Bernardino County.
. Properties that may become restricted in access or landlocked.
. Availability of parking facilities and any lots or parking spaces that would be affected
by the project.
ATTACHMENT A
. Impacts to minority populations and low-income populations will be evaluated in
compliance with Executive Order 12898, Environmental Justice for Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations.
. Impacts on the local economy, including the effects of the widening on development,
local property and sales tax revenues, City expenditures, job opportunities,
accessibility, and retail sales.
. Results of discussions with local officials, including the Finance Department,
Community Development Department, City Manager, and Chamber of Commerce.
. Summary of any local studies prepared by the City regarding the widening impacts.
. The number, occupational type, length of employment, and demographic
characteristics of employees of firms within the area affected by the widening.
. Impacts on the economic vitality of existing freeway-related uses and the resultant
impact, if any, on the City's local economy.
. The significance of the impacts to the City and whether the economic impacts would
be temporary or permanent.
. Potential impacts on property values of businesses and commercial facilities will be
estimated.
3. Measures to mitigate impacts on community and neighborhood cohesion, economic
impacts, and other identified impacts will be identified.
Deliverables. LSA will provide the client with up to eight (8) copies of the Draft CIA; and eight
(8) copies of the Final CIA.
Task 4.10: Relocation Impact Study (optional)
The proposed project may include displacements of nonresidential properties located within the
proposed right-of-way. Therefore, a Draft Relocation Impact Study (DR IS) will need to be
prepared in accordance with Chapter 602, Relocation Impact Documents, of the Caltrans
Relocation Assistance and Housing Procedures Manual. The DRIS will include the following
items:
. Estimated number, size, and type of nonresidential displacements and approximate
number of employees;
. Current and anticipated availability of relocation resources;
. A discussion of any relocation problems specific to this project, along with suggested
solutions to those problems;
. Relocation needs of those persons who are to be displaced;
. Replacement housing for those residents displaced by the proposed project;
. Relocation difficulties and recommendations for orderly relocation; and
. Consideration of any special relocation advisory services.
This report will provide the City of San Bernardino, Caltrans, and the general public with
information regarding nonresidential displacements that would result from implementation of the
proposed project. This task includes a site visit, research, and preparation of a DRIS by LSA
ATTACHMENT A
staff. Once a final alignment is selected by the City, LSA staff will prepare a Final Relocation
Impact Study (FRIS) in accordance with Chapter 602, Relocation Impact Documents, of the
Caltrans Relocation Assistance and Housing Procedures Manual. It is estimated that there will
be approximately 3 nonresidential properties impacted and evaluated in the report. This scope
of work covers up to 5 nonresidential and no residential properties.
LSA will obtain Metroscan data that itemize the structure type, structure value, and parcel value
of affected properties. LSA will also be responsible for estimating the number of employees
displaced by the proposed project based on standard formulas used for calculating the number
of employees for certain types of businesses (based on the square footage occupied by a
business). This scope of work does not include interviewing the affected owners and tenants of
the displaced properties.
Deliverables. LSA will provide the client with up to eight (8) copies of the DRIM; and eight (8)
copies of the FRIS.
Task 5: Prepare Administrative Draft IS/EA
The results of the technical studies will be presented in a DraftIS/EA prepared pursuant to the
IS/EA Annotated Outline on the Caltrans SER Web site (December 2008). LSA will prepare an
administrative DraftIS/EA incorporating the findings of the technical studies for submittal to the
engineer, the City, and Caltrans for review (up to 18 copies).
Task 6: Prepare Second Administrative Draft IS/EA
LSA will revise the DraftIS/EA based on comments received from the engineer, the City, and
Caltrans and will submit the revised Draft IS/EA to the engineer, the City, and Caltrans for
review (up to 18 copies).
Task 7: Prepare Draft IS/EA for Approval to Circulate (One Copy for Signature)
LSA will revise the DraftlS/EA per comments received from Caltrans and will prepare the Draft
IS/EA for Caltrans signature for approval to circulate the document for public review (up to 18
copies).
Task 8: Public Review
LSA will prepare a draft public distribution list per input from the City and Caltrans. The Draft
IS/EA will be circulated for public review and submitted to the Office of Planning and Research
(OPR) (up to 50 copies; CDs of the IS/EA may be used instead of hard copies as appropriate)
per the distribution list, once the list has been approved by the City and Caltrans. LSA will
prepare a Notice of Availability (NOA) and Opportunity for Public Hearing to be published in a
local newspaper by LAN Engineering or the City. This task includes up to $500 for translating
the public notice into Spanish, if required by Caltrans. LSA will attend a public information
meeting during the public review period or a public hearing to be coordinated and conducted by
others, if Caltrans determines that a public hearing is required.
ATTACHMENT A
Task 9: Prepare Draft Response to Comments
The Draft Response to Comments will be prepared for submittal to the PDT (engineer, the City,
and Caltrans) (up to 18 copies) for review and comment. The Draft Response to Comments will
be revised per the PDT's comments and submitted to Caltrans for approval. LSA will prepare
responses for its areas of responsibility and will coordinate with LAN Engineering, the City, and
Caltrans to prepare responses for their respective areas of responsibility. The level of effort to
prepare the responses to comments is based on no more than 100 LSA staff hours.
Task 10: Prepare Draft MND/FONSI
LSA will prepare a Draft MNDIFONSI, including revisions based on responses to comments
received during the public review period, for submittal to LAN Engineering, the City, and
Caltrans for review (18 copies).
Task 11: Prepare Final MND/FONSI
A Final MND/FONSI will be prepared for submittal to Caltrans for review and approval. As part
of the process for the Final MND/FONSI, LSA will prepare response letters to agencies that
submitted comments on the Draft IS/EA and prepare and file a Notice of Determination (NOD).
The City is responsible for the CDFG NOD filing fee, and any County filing fees. LSA will
prepare a Notice of Availability of the Final MNDIFONSI to be published by LAN Engineering or
the City. LSA will provide up to 20 copies of the approved MND/FONSI.
Task 12: Environmental Commitments Record
LSA will prepare a draft and a final Environmental Commitments Record (ECR) in accordance
with the guidelines on the SER Web site (December 2008) for use in ensuring implementation of
the mitigation measures for the project. The ECR will be used in the design and construction of
the proposed project for the selected alternative. The ECR will incorporate the mitigation
measures from the environmental document. For each mitigation measure, the ECR will include
a list of the following items: a description of the mitigation measure, the timing of implementation,
the performance objectives, the requirements for verification of compliance, and the party
responsible for verifying compliance. The draft ECR will be submitted to the engineer, the City,
and Caltrans for review and comment, and the final ECR will be provided to Caltrans along with
the Final IS/EA for approval.
G TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
The traffic impact analysis will consist of preparing an objective report suitable for submission to
the reviewing agency. The report will be prepared in accordance with accepted professional
transportation engineering standards. The final illustrated report will summarize the traffic
impact analysis findings, methodology, and supportive data. It will quantify existing traffic
conditions, traffic conditions upon project completion, and recommend mitigation measures.
Specifically, the traffic impact analysis will consist of (1) obtaining the latest State Street
alignment (Alternative 1); (2) conducting a field survey; (3) documenting existing traffic
conditions; (4) obtaining the East Valley Traffic Model Year 2035 traffic volumes with Medical
Center Drive as a 4 lane roadway and a 2 lane roadway; (5) mitigating the impacts; and (6)
ATTACHMENT A
preparing a written report. Mitigation measures will include roadway sizing recommendations,
intersection controls, and special treatments such as left turn pockets and right turn lanes as
might be required by the project.
The traffic impact analysis will include calculation of intersection delay utilizing the Highway
Capacity Manual methodology at the following study area intersections:
State Street (NS) at:
SR-210 Freeway WB Ramps (EW)
SR-21 0 Freeway EB Ramps (EW)
16th Street (EW)
Baseline Road (EW)
9th Street (EW)
Foothill Boulevard - SR-66 (EW)
In addition, the average daily traffic volumes will be obtained at the following locations:
Pepper Avenue, south of Highland Avenue
Pepper Avenue, north of Baseline Road
Pepper Avenue, south of Baseline Road
Pepper Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - SR-66
Pepper Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard - SR-66
State Street, north of SR-210 Freeway
State Street, south of SR-210 Freeway
State Street, north of Baseline Road
State Street, south of Baseline Road
State Street, north of Foothill Boulevard - SR-66
State Street, south of Foothill Boulevard - SR-66
California Street, south of Highland Avenue
California Street, north of Baseline Road
Medical Center Drive, south of Highland Avenue
Medical Center Drive, north of Baseline Road
Medical Center Drive, south of Baseline Road
Medical Center Drive, north of 5th Street - SR-66
Responses To Comments
Review one set of governmental agency comments, whether verbal or written, and revise draft
traffic impact analysis (if necessary).
Meeting Attendance
The proposed fee does not include attendance at publiC hearings/meetings, which may be
required to secure approval of the project. If these are required and requested, attendance at
follow-up meetings or hearings will be billed on a time-and-material basis.
Copies Of Report
Four copies (three bound and one PDF for the client's use) of the traffic impact analysis will be
prepared and submitted to the client.
ATTACHMENT A
H VALUE ANALYSIS
I. Team Authority and Coordination:
VA Study to comply with NHS VE mandate and follow the Caltrans VA methodology
as outlined in the Chapter 19, "Value Analysis" of the Project Development
Procedures Manual (PDPM) and detailed in the Caltrans VA Team Guide and Report
Guide - Third Editions, April 2003. VA studies identify and evaluate alternative
project solutions and provide recommendations to decision-makers.
Study Coordination:
R. Terry Hays, Program Manager, Value Management Strategies, Inc.
Team Leader, TBD, Value Management Strategies, Inc.
Ed Ng, LAN Engineering
City of San Bernardino
D-8 Caltrans
II. Study Participants and Schedule
The VA Study is to follow the activities as defined in the Caltrans VA Activity Chart.
The list of VA Study participants will be developed by Caltrans. The study will be
three and half days (with an option for five days). A pre-study meeting will be
scheduled no later than the week prior to the start of the study. Once the Draft report
has been reviewed the project stakeholders, and implementation meeting will be
conducted to resolve the disposition of the VA Alternatives presented in the report.
III. Period of Performance
LAN Engineering shall provide the Contractor with written approval prior to
commencement of any work.
IV. Scope of Services
The required services are to lead a VA study of the above-described project. The scope
of the work shall include but is not limited to the following:
. Provide a qualified, independent Certified Value Specialist (CVS) team leader to
lead a VA study in accordance with Caltrans value methodology.
. Provide VA study documentation in accordance with the Caltrans VA
Report Guide and this task order.
. Conference rooms will be provided by City of San Bernardino.
. Ensure that applicable data and correspondence, any other relevant information
necessary for the VA study is collected, developed and distributed.
. Facilitate VA Team Meetings.
V. VA Deliverables
The VA Team Leaders are responsible for the following:
. Develop the draft VA study charter (Attachments A, Band C per the Caltrans
Team Guide.
ATTACHMENT A
. Leading VA Study. Participants should include representatives of; City of San
Bernardino including the Project Manager, Caltrans and LAN Engineering, project
development team staff, and key outside project stakeholders (local transportation
agencies, local govemment, and permitting agencies).
. Complete the Preliminary VA Report with input/review of VA Team and technical
reviewers in accordance with the VA Report Guide - Third Edition and with the
following items:
. A distribution list for the VA reports must be developed with the Project
Manager.
. Submit Preliminary VA Report in electronic format; no more than 2-weeks
following Initial VA Presentation, as specified in the report distribution list.
. Coordinate with LAN Engineering, Caltrans and City of San Bernardino on the
project stakeholders' responses to the preliminary VA report and prepare for an
implementation meeting to resolve the disposition of the VA alternatives, finalize
the VA study reportables (costs, performance and value indices).
. Submit Final VA Report as specified in Caltrans VA Report Guide - Third Edition.
Report should be submitted no more than 3 weeks following VA Final
Presentation. Final VA report will be in an electronic copy in PDF format of the
entire report and a separate file in excel format of the VA study summary report.
. Submit electronic copies of the updated VA study summary reports and updated
Executive Summary as needed to document the resolution of conditionally
approved alternatives as specified in the Final VA Report.
VI. Reports and/or Meetings
The Contractor shall submit progress reports, and meet with LAN Engineering, as
needed, to discuss progress on the study.
The Contractor shall schedule and facilitate an implementation meeting at a date and
time to be determined by the LAN Engineering, and the Project Manager.
PROVIDE TECHNICAL STAFF FOR VALUE ANALYSIS (Optional}
The Value Analysis requires technical staff for the review, evaluation, and development of
alternatives and strategies to affect cost savings and project benefits. The City and agencies
may furnish technical staff to participate in the value analysis. If the City does not have staff
available to be committed to the value analysis for the duration of the value analysis, LAN can
furnish technical staff for the value analysis. It is anticipated that technical staff in the disciplines
of civil engineering design, structural engineering, environmental, construction management,
and utilities engineering will be required. LAN can provide staff for the three and half days value
analysis with an option for five days. The staff provided will be independent and have had no
significant involvement in the development of the project prior to the value analysis.
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CCO # 1 ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR
STATE STREET -16th STREET TO FOOTHILL BLVD
Rev. 0
lhIuf.09
L1M & NASCIMENTO ENG. CORP.
1887 Business Center Drive, Suite 6
San Bernardino, CA 92408
(909) 890-0477
ATTACHMENT B
0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
g g 0 ~ u q . u ~
~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~
~ c !l
~ .
it .; ~ . :i
~ if ~ II ~ . :i Ii
~ :I ;; . .
.
z z
c 0
u u
. .
~ ~
.. . ~ ~ .
0 ~ ~
... 0 g .. .. c 0
8 ~ . ~
.. 0 ~ ~ . 0
~ ~ "
W ~. 0 0 ~
() ~ ~ ~
0 ~ :l X :i ;t il ~
z .
is w ;;
.. ..
~ Z ~ ~
Cl . .
U; t j 0
W W ~ .
lD Q 8 8 g 0 ~ ~ .
~ . . ~
Z ..J ~ ~ m N
C ~ 0 . S ~ ~ 0 ~ g
.. ! :i li ::i ~ . .
0 i
... 0 . <I . . ::t :i !
0 ;:: .,; ~ a
~ is a = ;
U Q
C
~ ~
.. c
0 I .
() i
() . ~ .. ;;
<i . 0-
" ili " ~ z
~ ~ r ~ w
.. " .. ~ "
::; w lj w , lj
~ <; ~ <; . ~ .. ~
w w ~ . ;!
z ~ ~
r .. w
f!! .. ~ f!! .. ~
u ~ ~
. w Z .. 0 g z "
w Iii u . ;! a . u ~ a
~ ~ z z ~ .
!2. w -' 0- w ~ Ii
.. g .. . .. . ..
0- ~ w w ::> z 0- w w z ::>
z ~ ~ ~ .. ;! z ~ ~ il .. ~
~ z ~ z
< ~ u ~ -' ~ 0
~ ~ ~ ::> ~ ~ ::>
::> 0 .. ::> ~ 0 ..
~ w Z w > Z
.. < ~ ::> 0 .. ~ ~ ::> 0
z ~ ~ .. z ~ ~ ..
0 ~ 0 0 0
~ ~ 0 -' w '1 0 -' w
;! .. "' ~ " ;;
::> 0 ii! ::> ii! ~
.. 0- .. .. ..
8 ~ ~ 8
:. ~ il ~ Ii
~ c ~
it .; . ~ ~
~ <I <I .
.
8 8 8 ~ 0 . 8 ~
. ~
~ ~ " ~ !! ~ ~.
0 8 c
it ~ . if :;j ~ .; :i . !
a II .
. II .
o
.
:i
~
II
8
~
.
:I
~
g
~
I
a
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CCO # 1 ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR
STATE STREET. 16th STREET TO FOOTHILL BLVD
[!m
DIRECT LABOR
Classification Name Hours Hourly Rate Total
Project Manager Mohan Char I Edward Ng 420 @ $170.00 $ 71,400.00
Sr. Project Engineer Robert Price I Todd Dudley 282 @ $160.00 $ 45,120.00
Project Engineer Dong Kim I Abila Sivathasan 1,010 @ $115.00 $ 116,150.00
Associate Engineer Kimberly Gee 1,078 @ $95.00 $ 102,410.00
Assistant Engineer David Saretsky 704 @ $70.00 $ 49,280.00
Sr. CAD Ray Andrasek 1,590 @ $95.00 $ 151,050.00
Clericall Administrative Kristina Clark I Nairobi Mathis 56 @ $75.00 $ 4,200.00
Environmental Manager Alicia Colburn 416 @ $115.00 $ 47,840.00
Enviromnental VA TBD O@ $170.00 $ 0.00
I ,I II t )11 q I I Ii " ( , ,(~ " .;;;:\- ~':;;11111I
OTHER COSTS
Copying I Binding
Plotting
Express Mail
Mileage
Potholing
$
$
$
$
$
2,500.00
800.00
500.00
300.00
0.00
I 1,1 (11'lll Illlld ( ,,,(... .... I]IIP II1I
SUBTOTAL OF COST DIRECT LABOR S. ODC IOPflONAL SERVICES)
DIRECT LABOR
Classification
Project Manager
Sr. Project Engineer
Project Engineer
Associate Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Sr. CAD
ClericaV Administrative
Environmental Manager
Enviromnental VA
Name
Mohan Char I Edward Ng
Robert Price I Todd Dudley
Dong Kim I Abila Sivathasan
Kimberly Gee, Heng Chow, Nelly Lo
David Saretsky
Ray Andrasek
Kristina Clark I Nairobi Mathis
Alicia Colburn
TBD
Hours
96 @
40@
48 @
O@
O@
O@
O@
8@
40 @
Hourly Rate
$170.00
$160.00
$115.00
$95.00
$70.00
$95.00
$75.00
$115.00
$170.00
[!m
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total
16,320.00
6,400.00
5,520.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
920.00
6,800.00
I : I lllt, 11 il" t' .,1, '\ '':;; "111111
Date:
71612009
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CCO . 1 ADDITIONAl. DESIGN SERVICe:S FOR
STATE S1REeT -1M1l STREET TO FOOna..L"VO
ATTACHMENT B
rnJ
, , , . , . , . . ,..... ,...
TASKS & SUBTASKS ,. '" " "'00 .... ",^" ..~ ,~. r EnvM r "w. CosI
no ,~ '" ~ " ~ " '" no
Tuk1_Ty.-Seleo:tlon
, ProjedCoordlnaUon " " 14.010
OWQC . . S/.3&I
TyjleSeIec&n(St8teStSpltMIyBridge) . . " " " ~.7<1O
. T'yp_s~.._cti!>nJ~~!WF<><)IhICu"'-rtl , " " " 14.120
Sublol. " . . " " '" ."
TulIZ-lnlll"PS&E
ProJedCoord.l.nltiDn .. .. U.llIO
. ... OWQC " ,.. " SG,120
oe.jg~_[~nIitS"i~.Y!l~_dg.l ~ ,.. "" = "",!l(I(I
Plenl{S!ltlStSpillwayBridge) ". '" '" $97,310
{)Qlgn{~WF~IICulvlrl} " " '" '" S27,200
" Plsnl {Stets StlFODtII"Cul'ie<l) " = S3ll.100
" Ol:II!ftSPec:ill..tionl " " ,,-
" 65"Submibl . " . , .. .""
" l~d~~r1.d~Il!_.C~~Hs~._.S1.8P!lI'>'ol'y.l;lrlo:l!lll " ~ 1:g.__1.80 ... . .. ." H1.5QO
1~- IndspendentChllCk{Slets8t/FDDlhiIBI'idCuh-srtJ " " ,.. S/~04O.
" """"""" " '" ~ SanD
" au....Wft/EItimllt. . ~ .. $M20
,-- '" ". '" ." ". ".. "" "'"
Ts,k3-FIIlllIPS&E
" ProjllClCoordlneliDn " . '. " $5.3110
" FinelPS&E " " " ~ .. ". S31,8lIO
"""'- " " " " ~ '" '" '"
Tuk4-BIdSlt
:: ProjeclCoordineliDn . ""
.Cs'!ll.reRlldy . " .. . ._llO ". $/~380
,-- . . " .. ~ ,,, "
Tnk.5-COlIItrIIctlonSuptlOlt..
;; ProjeclCoon:Iinetion.. , " $2.720
BldSUpport.. . " " ,,-
;; RFI'slShopOnrNingl- " " " " $UlIO
. A&-Bulls- . " .. " _ ~5,320
,-- " '" " " " ". $1.1
.._TobebU....ettlrne&metwt.... .
:: CoordlneliDnwith csnrsns " . " $5,000
MHtingi--n- " . " ."..
, OevIlopConClptullAlgnmenll . " " .. $4,5110
;: DeVllopGAO'srorClllrenlApp<OVIII " " " " " .. U,620
Prep..sPreUmlneryCClIEstimet.. . . . " ,,-
;; Prep..e~illn~ptionlrorC,nranl " " " . " S6,l60
, ProjedRsport . " " " SMOO
, PrIAA'e~"F:'ll:&E " " " " '" $10."'"
Preparsgs"Pll:&E " " " " ". $16,000
Prepare100"A._PS&E . . " " ~ S5.560
PreplfeS'MlR . " " . .. S6,200
PreplfeFinIIBkI.Oocume.nll. " " " " " S7,8OO
, Addlllot\,IPro~I;tM'nlgemenl " " $4.010
Sublol. '" " '" '" ". " " ." .."
, _..u
it- '" . '" " S2.t60
. Tlchnlcelstudiel " "" ". S2~720
, "'''''' . " .. ..'"
, FinslEA . " .. $5.280
, Meetings. ..__ . .. .. ~.260
, ProjllCtMlnegement . " .. $7.580
"""'- " .~ ." ...,
: PUBLIC rfA1RSS;_Ui>_POl\T
<<.. prl.snt"l>onBosrdl " " " ",~
Sublet. " " " ..
I
- VALUE fLYS'S (LAN _3.5 DIY" " " " .. $ll,.uo
5 Oelllln T..m Partlclpelkm
,_. .. " " .. .."
. .......
TOTAL lIASl!. ... .., 1010 ,WO "" ,'" .. ". '''' ...,
OPTIONAL SERVICES
)
o..ll:i~TII.rl1_F:'_lrlIapl1ion " . . " 14,560
SublDtsl " . . " ..
. .
)
, T",,~.ni!"l.~~ " .. .. .. . . . .. '" ~J,l16O
Sublotll " " .. .. '" ."
. TllChnicalSll11 " " " " ~ S~.420
8ubtotel " " " " ~ ..
TOTAL OPTIONAl RlMC .. .. .. . .. '" 35,_.
'"' '"'
'"'' 1tv11+
H,IWJ
S/.3&I
"'..
S4,1M
$15300
S6.111O
$G,120
".mom ,,","
Sg7,3la
S7.500 SII,700
S36,100
",-
..."
141,600
S/6,Of/)
SIf.no
$<<620
"',no .... ,
..'"
S31,16O
'"
""
S/5,360
".
,,""
$;::460
....
....... tM~
'"
~5QO $1,!j(XI
".. $1.140
$4,580
..'"
,,-
$6,760
"...
. $10,"'"
$18,000
"'"
....
S7,600
U,,",
.n ""
$1,600 $1,380
$/5,000 $lli.720
U," .'"
$~21lO
F,500 n,'"
U,_ ",,"
,,'... ""
,,~
..
$g,.uo
.. ..
.
$141400 ....
1:4._560 .
..
$21."'"
121MO
$~m
.....
..
.,,'"
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CCO # 1 ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR
STATE STREET -16th STREET TO FOOTHILL BLVD
OTHEf~ DIRECT COSTS
[!m
DESCRIPTIONS
Copying I Binding
Plotting
Express Mail
Mileage
Pol holing
TOTAL
$2,500.00
$800.00
$500.00
$300.00
Date:
71612009
ATTACHMENT "c"
Um And N_lmento 1Ing1....,.... Corpol'lltlon
~
July 8, 2009
Mr. Mike Grubbs, P.E.
City of San Bernardino Public Works Department
300 N. "D" Street, 3'" Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001
Re: State Street - Foothill Blvd to 16th Street
Project Budget Cost Reduction
Dear Mike,
The City of San Bernardino's City Manager sent a letter dated 12/16/09 requesting cost
reduction by contractors and vendors as a part of the City's strategy to cope with the fiscal
crisis. LAN Engineering has enjoyed a mutually beneficial relationship with the City and
understands the difficulties facing municipalities in these times.
In this spirit, LAN Engineering will agree to a 5% reduction for each invoice. The 5% reduction
will be applied to invoices issued commencing with the next invoice. The cost reduction will
apply to amounts invoiced against the remainder of the original contract as well as the recently
submitted CCO#1. We will apply this cost reduction until the expiration of the contract which is
scheduled for July 31, 2010.
Sincerely,
Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation
~ <-- <-,
Edward Ng, P.E
Project Manager
618 N. Diamond Bar Blvd.
Diamond Bar. CA 91765
(909) 89~20
Fax (909) 860-1306
1 RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE
3 EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH LAN ENGINEERING
CORPORATION TO PROVIDE CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES AND
4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR STATE STREET FROM 16TH STREET
TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD — EXTEND AND CONSTRUCT (4) LANES OF
5 ROADWAY (1.5 MILES) TO CONNECT STATE STREET TO RANCHO AVENUE
6 (SSO4-09).
7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
8
9 SECTION 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute Amendment
10 No. I to Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation to Provide Civil Engineering Design
11 Services and Project Management Services for State Street from 16`x' Street to Foothill Boulevard
12 — Extend and Construct (4) Lanes of Roadway (1.5 miles) to Connect State Street to Rancho
13 Avenue (SSO4-09), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
14
reference as fully as though set forth at length.
15
16 SECTION 2. This Amendment shall not take effect until it is fully signed and executed
17 by the parties, and no party shall be obligated hereunder until the time of such full execution. No
18 oral contracts, amendments, modifications or waivers are intended or authorized and shall not be
19 implied from any act or course of conduct of any party.
20 SECTION 3. This resolution is rescinded if the parties to the Agreement fail to
21
execute it within sixty(60) days of the passage of the resolution.
22
23
24
25
26
27 /
28 � c�
1 RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE
3 EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT WITH LAN ENGINEERING
CORPORATION TO PROVIDE CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES AND
4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR STATE STREET FROM 16TH STREET
TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD — EXTEND AND CONSTRUCT (4) LANES OF
5 ROADWAY (1.5 MILES) TO CONNECT STATE STREET TO RANCHO AVENUE
6 (SSO4-09).
7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
8
9 SECTION 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute Amendment
10 No. 1 to Agreement with LAN Engineering Corporation to Provide Civil Engineering Design
11 Services and Project Management Services for State Street from 16`" Street to Foothill Boulevard
12 — Extend and Construct (4) Lanes of Roadway (1.5 miles) to Connect State Street to Rancho
13 Avenue (SSO4-09), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
14
reference as fully as though set forth at length.
15
SECTION 2. This Amendment shall not take effect until it is fully signed and executed
16
17 by the parties, and no party shall be obligated hereunder until the time of such full execution. No
18 oral contracts, amendments, modifications or waivers are intended or authorized and shall not be
19 implied from any act or course of conduct of any party.
20 SECTION 3. This resolution is rescinded if the parties to the Agreement fail to
21
execute it within sixty(60) days of the passage of the resolution.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28