HomeMy WebLinkAbout61-Planning
~I~ OF SAN BERNARD~O - REQU.QT FOR COUNCIL ~c'jON'
From:
David Anderson
Acting Planning Director
Dept:
Planning
REC'D,~~. of,f.ange of Zone No. 87-5
l~a7 KAY 21
PM 4:Milyor and Council Meeting of
.:f1fue 1, 1987, 2:00 p.m.
Date: May 12, 1987
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Previous Planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on May 6, 1987, the
following recommendation was made:
The application for Change of Zone No. 87-5 was unanimously
recommended for approval.
The Negative Declaration for environmental impact was also
recommended for approval.
RecommentJed motion:
To approve, modify or reject the findings and the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and to direct the City Attorney to
prepare the necessary amendments to the zoning Code.
To approve the responses to comments and to adopt the Negative
Declaration for environmental impact which has been reviewed and
considered.
/a:~/ d,::/.' '
Signature David Anderson
David Anderson
Phone:
383-5057
Contact person:
Ward:
7
Supporting 1ata attached:_
Staff Report
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
~nClnrl<::l ''tern r\ln
(Pt--
c
, CiTY OF
C 0
BERNARDINO PLANNING
o
DEPARTMENT ~
SAN
SUMMARY
""
lIJ
(I)
<(
o
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
')
')/6/87
7
~
APPLICANT: orma 0 er
7073 Buchanan Avenue
San Bdno.. CA 92404
Pauline Knox
380 Antelope Drive
Sedona. Arizona 86336
Change of Zone No. 87-5
PROPERTY
Subject
East
West"
North
South
OWNER,
EXISTING
LAND USE
Vacant
Single-Fam. Res.
3 sm. single-family
detached homes
Single-Fam. Res.
Vacant
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC
HAZARD ZONE
Applicant requests approval to change the zoning designation
from R-l, Single Family Residential to R-3, Multiple Family
Residential on a .45 acre site.
ti
lIJ
::)
a
'"
a:
"
<(
lIJ
a:
<(
Subject property is located on the south side of Marshall Blvd. .
approximately 251 feet west of the centerline of Del Rosa Avenue
and further described as 1571 East Marshall Blvd.
HIGH FIRE
HAZARD ZONE
..J
~
Z (I) I
I.IJ(!)
~Z
Z-
OO
a::Z
:::LL:
Z
I.IJ
DNOT
APPLICABLE
D EXEMPT
rn NO
SIGNIFICANT
EFFECTS
NOV, 1181 REVISED ~ULV 1.'2
SKV
oVES
~NO
ZONING
R-l-/200
R-3-2000
R-3-1200
PRD-14
R-1-7200
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION
Med.Den. Res.
Med.Den. Res.
Med.Den. Res,
Med.Den. Res.
Med.Den. Res.
FLOOD HAZARD
ZONE
m YES OZONE A
o NO ijiZONE B
SEWERS
~YES
oNO
DYES
00 NO
DVES
~NO
AIRPORT NOISE / 0 YES
CRASH ZONE DaNO
D POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT
EFFECTS
WITH MITIGATING
MEASURES NO E.I, R,
D E,IR, REQUIRED BUT NO
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
WITH MITIGATING
MEASURES
D SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
SEE ATTACHED E,R C,
MINUTES
Z
o
-
t(
11.0
II.ffi
~2
(1)2
o
o
I.IJ
a::
REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT ARE^
[)!I APPROVAL
D CONDITIONS
D DENIAL
o CONTINUANCE TO
c
o
o
:>
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE COZ NO. 87 -5
OBSERVATIONS
5
",/6/R7
7
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
1. The parcel to the west contains three small detached single
family dwellings which share a common garage structure. The
parcel to the south is vacant. To the south of the vacant
parcel is a single family residential neighborhood. There are
single family residences to the east and north and a condominium
project on the opposite side of Marshall Boulevard a few hundred
feet to the west.
2. zoning to the south is R-1-7200, the parcel on the west is R-3-
1200, the three parcels to the east are R-3-1200, and a large
area across Marshall Boulevard to the north is zoned PRD-14
(Planned Residential Development at 14 units per acre).
3. The General Plan designation for the property in question and
the surrounding area is Medium Density Residential at 8-14
dwelling units per acre. An R-3-3000 zoning district would be
consistent with the Medium Density Residential designation.
4. The proposed zone change would not adversely affect traffic
circulation in the area.
5. The parcel exceeds the minimum standards for size and shape of
multiple family development sites.
6. At their regularly scheduled meeting on April 9, 1987, the
Environmental Review Committee recommended adoption of a
negative Declaration for Change of Zone No. 87-5.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon
adoption of
No. 87-5.
the observations contained herein, Staff recommends
the negative declaration and approval of Change of Zone
Respectfully Submitted,
DAVID ANDERSON,
Acting Planning Director
5~__lV "'
SCOTT WRIGHT, ~
Aide
c
~"'I
"-'
:>
0,
~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT""'
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
A. BACKGROUND
1. Case Number (s): Change of Zone No. 87-5
Date: 4/9/87
2. Project Description: To "h''"gl'' the zoning des] gnation from
R-l, ~inglp F~mily RpRinpnti~l to R-1, Multiple Family Resi
Mpnr;~l nn ~ ~s ~r~p ~irp
3.
South S'de of Marshall Blvd., 251' west of
Ceneral Location: .:.
the centerline of Del Rosa
-, '~." ...~ ,to M~"'Rh"ll RhTn ,
Ave., further described as
L
....
B.
~;NV IRONMENT AL IMP ACTS
MAYBE
YES
1. Could project change
cated on the General
within general area?
proposed uses of land, as indi-
Plan, either on project site or
..x..
2. Would significant increases in either noise levels,
dust odors, fumes, vibration or radiation be gener-
ated from project area, either during construction
or from completed project other than those result-
ing from normal construction activity?
3. Will project involve application, use or disposal
of hazardous or toxic materials?
4. Will any deviaLion from any established environ-
mental standards (air, water, noise, light, etc.)
and/or adopted plans be requested in connection
with project?
5. Will the project require the use of significant
amounts of energy which could be reduced by the
use of appropriate mitigation measures?
6. Could the project create a traffic hazard or
congestion?
7. Could project result in any substantial change in
quality, quantity, or accessibility of any portion
of region's air or surface and ground water re-
sources?
~l
I
x
x
x
x
x
x
~
E.Re. FORM A
c
COZ NO. 87-5
o
o
J
~
. ------- ~_.._._._------
8. Will project involve construction of facilities in
an area which could be flooded during an inter-
mediate regional or localized flood?
9. Will project involve construction of facilities or
services beyond those presently available or pro-
posed in near future?
10. Could the project result in the displacement of
community residents?
11. Are there any natural or man-made features in pro-
ject area unique or rare (i.e. not normally
found in other parts of country or regions)?
12. Are there any known historical or archaelogical
sites in vicinity of project area which could be
affected by project?
13. Could the project affect Lhe use of a recrea-
tional area or area of important aesthetic value
or reduce or restrict access to public lands or
parks?
14. Are there any known rare or endangered plant
species in the project area?
15. Does project area serve as habitat, food source,
nesting place, source of water, migratory path,
etc., for any rare or endangered wildlife or fish
species?
16. Will project be l.ocated in immediate area of any
adverse geologic nature such as slide prone areas,
highly erosible soils, earthquake faults, etc.?
17. Could project substantially affect potential use
or conservation of a non-renewable natural
resource?
18. Will any grading or excavation be required in
connection with project which could alter any
existing prominent surface land form, i.e., hill-
side, canyons, drainage courses, ete?
19. Will any effects of the subject project together
or in conjunction with effects of other projects
cause a cumulative significant adverse impact on
the environment?
l
...
MAY '81
YES
MAYBE
-:l
.x.
-X
...z
~
--.X
.x
x
x
x
x
x
x
'~
EAC. FORM A
.
,
c
o
o
:;
COZ NO R7-"
~ .. ""'I
C. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
If any of the findings of (act have been answered YES or MAYBE, then a brief
clarification of potential impact shall be included as well as a discussion
of any cumulative effects (attach additional sheets if needed).
D. MITIGATION MEASURES
Describe type and anticipated effect of any measures proposed to miti,gate or
eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts:
~-
.-- J
-_._-_.~- --.------ .~--' ~
E. DETERMINATION
On the has is of this initial evaluation,
fX) We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
envIronment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I
!
0 We fInd that although the proposed project could have a significant
\ effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached shee t
havl' been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPA~ED.
0 We find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
~~f/ - -6r ,&IL
(Secretary) VALERIE C. ROSS, Assistant Planner
, ~-.3O-87
DATE:
"'-'
ERe. FORM A
1,
,
..,
>
i
..
.......
"
.~
~ .r
t
~N..I'
._1f:..
-.
':: io.~
'I N' .'
"
(n.
~.i...:;..:.-_. - - I
-' .I(~.- __.
~ ~
~ "
,.~ ~ ~
" ~'
~... -.: t
." ~
~. ....
~
~
~ q~
~ ~~~
q<i ,..,
,
f' " "
Iq
~~ 'II
~
q~
<ll' 'b
'"'"
.\
MA'1.HALL .r
, .
~
:-.: '
"'--
"';BOULEVARD
..-
I'" -. I .... ~'"
- --)..-;-~,~.--trx...
il
IN'
I
.~
,<l'1
'/)
..11-..
,1:.
<I~~..~X
~a~ ~~Ip
~'l}
q~
. 0J'b
"
"
.I' e,. L.
"" fI"lJt
o~
~
-
.
~]) ; i
~
,
..
"
;..
\ i
,
1/-1
.~
<<
~
q~~
~ .~~
~
~
~
~ ~
~; \'
~~~
1-
i)
dllJlIt1~: IftUItIlV~~ tf 11ft
.J~I.;f/l,~" P/:1vtJ
'IA Mil. 11_
/if)) IN- Q'
IM,.,~ ItJI'fIfII #181;": 1M -111- #
"fW: 15, #1 t 1f1/l1/'t1 'IeIr/I ~1If
)fZ ~~iJ~=~_' t.,~ M1.I
.lie ';fjl;gW tltIJlYt/. 6}Ili 17
~/h1 . 5L"~~
(1M) ,Z,g-I.l1I
...
:::>>
z
i
c
Ii
..J
...-
a
r
I
~,.,<~ J- ?...r...~,.
0' ,"
.? I - :.'
.
c
o
o
:>
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE
COZ NO. 87-5
5
HEARING DATE 5/61 H 7
\..
}\ ~""g[;.-~'~;,r: ~ -=!'~""ml!_ ..." QJ~~R I rf l.
~1 i jit!'~o'~r~\ "~ ., ,,"'.~~! '(""L..-R"
1 .0. OJ :, .~), Ii.,h ~ C ; jD.t; ~d ~ . "~i~'O p"
. / ~ ..'f,;.... R-l r;:;j. R.'" o~
~ I '-1'..' -II ,'IfR-gC ~.. . tf..
j 11 _'~~IQ3J ~~. l!j\::~:,"..~:-,,-~~~"" 7 R'I" l"~' ",,~ f '
Ii, . ..-=n I I~"'-' C r ~ \ '
! .......g;,\! . _ i -- , ~ $" LM. rR-~ ..
10; m U .'.. '; . - ." -~. ~
"- I ,.IS-,~ -a :' '1~1::-@ p~[J,: . ~~ 1f!ii,~,V ., ".'00 :
'0' 1 ~~' l~~~[ ,-,~rJ~~fln Jr;;:;,:.]. I"~'~'- R ~' ,
'\1 ~ If! . .,tt~tE I, .... ,JjlJjlJUU; f :>9'.=, ..(~51' ' ·
~ "0" ....~ . ~, :j.,. 141t1l"'" ~ 'n H~~. ~ Ii' 6. ~' ,,:,11..- !\: 72
__ I .\ ..,' - "'I' 11f>'il~:. - :!~,~ 6..",,--,,)~: i...Jj'~
~g'J "';40- ! i<1 I\') - - - !~rn''''''~']~! _.'...J ~ ~"1r~I"'\1 ~'-I lk'\rr~~~r~~
.~) it ~!r<n.~ R.2~' ~ I ~Il . R ~ ~ [::.!Ilr.l G r-m ,~~ J' ~J t:i~l
",'dO; R'I R-'.;\f-r R->~\"AC:. \':~ ~- 'I ~ l :Ii .OO~, .. ~ L!J\J:\,rd III "1 :~~'tiiI, r
___ ~r l~ l..:!, ' , ' = a;;.., ~ro:
~r !\rrm" ~~E - ~' -. III ;"\t;7,;?;~ 'I; Thf "n)J'niUO"" ~ "IL~
'~ " ~'_'L.J' OCT'- .. 'g",!: ." ! pi -~, 'lill - Ul rlLd"'- ,- wI ~c.,:-
~, 0 :" ~F~;:2 "11 J .~ ~ ~(O-~~ \if ~~li~i 1.1 q~~:::.~, 3 1
oj ~~BI'-', RI ,-"" u f:1t~-,- ~~iL-,J~ ....... ~ lIDrJl!R'.!~' ::
;~flt~'R"Ut."<I~F:""".'" ,;~ ;~3l',~ ,~~\ "J. ~i f., "\1
'J ~U n~""' :.-- 1'1 1" g'.E-J ~', w '~~~llii")' "--- R_-;J~,
J;~t ;~f\I' RI 411" ~" -.)-, a_\",., Jr.iR-~,:;~~
_~.. . ~I~ii'h' -l;:!~,f-'"'''''' ;::,C.. "l C'>A C'>A ~OO :,F___~OOO_!I,:N.',:-...
I ,"" ~~~, j--!.... C3A~.I~ C:U, II T ~ C-lA -""J i." ~
.=' '" '"'"', r r.- - ' :;, -~ MQf,-
" _'''''_.: ,-,. ~~._~~ C'''l~''~~l:'~~~':~~ .~~.~:AF ,~I~~~' ~~;{~:'8f'1~11\'
1 0 L--~ :. ~\ . C' fI (;n!.y l "1\ .~. I
~ -. ~,,' R-' ~::: .,.,.~~'. ~~~~ ~f(" 'r",.:~OO ~ ':.~: ~::& "1 in.) ;911
_, "',..........p!~ " ~ wc;j i~~l!~~~ ~_,' ~ I~' .,:LlliJ1r=.l1
"_I \~ t, ~ .:' i~/F= 0 " . ~fl~ej . ~~\3@@] " _r-! :~L,
~'.:t J 0 : I .~. 0 U~EJ' 0 III ..,. ~~\ [Jili]~~ot:.. ., J; .~,~,flll,
}e- ~. 0 0 t 0 ~.. .. "1 ~ . ,,= ~Btl 0
_I 'lj ; I 0.; II: . _0 .' ._____;:1 ft-, Cl'
_; ~ cr. _ , I~ 0.- ':' ~. ' .. u~;> R-I ,
~~ \ ::. I...' ! ! ~ q j Q~:nj 1,1 1 I G;l ...~:.:<;:.......,,--- 1..- !l,o:" [\\:
:?J <", " " '. .'.....1 , .' ."L-lJ~ BASC liNE ST, ~::o ,', A - ~
~~#A/,c.:.1Q""h.-::l ~~r- rMI~}Jl1foliii=C'3)IJr--lr:::lqr::-l1 -jnll:-
R~I~1200
~.
\
j