Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout23-Public Works 'C' o o ~ Resolution No. 81-295 was adopted by the followIng vote: Ayes: Council Members estrada, Reilly, FLores, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam, Miller. Noes: None. .a.b- sent: None. RES. 87-206 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO IMPOSING LIENS ON CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE COSTS OF THE ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE. (HJ93 W.. FIFTH STREET, 1494 N. COLORADO, 1456 N. COLORADO, 45" E. HOLDEN, 1327 W. KINGMAN, 2691 No PENNSYLVANIA, 2478 W. ST. ELHO).. (33) Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Flores and unanimously carried, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No. 87-206 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Flores, Maudsley, Minor, pope-Ludlam, Miller. Noes: None. ~b- sent: None. READING AND WAIVING OF ORDINANCES ON THE AGENDA City Clerk Clark read the titles of the ordinances on the Council Agenda. Council Member Pope-Ludlam made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada and unanimously carried, that fur- ther reading of the ordinances be waived. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROVIDING ZONING DESIGNATION C-M, COMMER- CIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT, FOR CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY (PREZONE 86-11, BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY TIPPECANOE AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY THE 1-10 FREEWAY, ON THE WEST BY ORCHARD DRIVE AND ON THE NORTH BY THE EXISTING CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY), AND ADOPT- ING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ENVIRON- MENTAL REVIEW. (34) City Attorney Penman stated that the proposed zone change is under the Phase 3 Extension from the Office of Planning and Research and, therefore, is under court order. City Clerk Clark answered questions regarding time limits between first and final readings of ordinances. City Attorney Penman stated that there is a minimum time limit between first and final readings of ordinances, but that it is unclear if there is a maximum time limit regulation. Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Flores and unanimously carried, that the ordinance be continued to the July 6, 1987, meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, because this ordinance is subject to Phase 3 of the OPR extension, and for clarification. ORD. MC-603 - ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTION 8.27.100 OF THE 3AN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAIN- ING TO COSTS INCURRED BY CITY FOR WEED! DEBRIS REMOVAL FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND REPEALING SECTIONS 8.27.1U. 8.27.12~ AND 8.27.13~. (35 ) 14 6/15/97 c2c3. ,,-..., \"".i o .~ ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF TilE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROVIDING ZONING DESIGNATION C-M, CO~1ERCIAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT, FOR CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY (PREZONE 86-11, BOUNDED or: THE B.r..ST BY TIPPECANOE AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY THE 1-10 FREEWAY, ON THE WEST BY ORCHARD DRIVE AND ON THE NORTH BY THE EXISTING CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY), AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIE~oJ . THE MAYOR AND COM~ON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN EERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Prezoninq of Certain Territory. The following described property, bounded on the east by Tippecanoe Avenue, on the south by the 1-10 freeway, on the west by Orchard Drive and on the north by the existing City limit boundary, is declared to be in the C-M, Commercial ~anufacturing District, effective on the effective date of annexation of the property to the City of San Bernardino. The land herein referred to as being annexed to the City of San Bernardino is more particularly described as follows, to wit: All of Tract 2743 as per plat recorded in Book 38 of Maps, page 47 records of the county Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California and that portion of Lot 5, Block 72 Rancho San Bernardino recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 2 records of said County together with the adjoining streets described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of 'i:.he Northwesterly right-of-way line for 1-10 (Redlands) Freeway and the center line of Tippecanoe Avenue, said point being also Point "A"; thence Course "A" Southwesterly along said Northeasterly prolongation and said Northwest right-of-way line a distance of 1400 feet, more or less, to an angle point on the City Limit Line for the City of San Bernardino, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence North along said City Limit Lin~ 1100 feet, more or less, to an angle point in said City Limit Line; thence East along said City Limit Line 1375 feet, more or less, to an angle point in said City Limit Line said point being also the center line of said Tippecanoe Avenue, thence leaving said City Limit 5/13/87 C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 --. V o ~ Line South along said center line 775 feet, more or less, to said Point "A"; thence Course "A" 1440 feet, more or less, to the True Point of Beginninc. Containing 30 acres more or less. SECTION 2. The negative declaration for environmental review, as adopted by the Environmental Review Committee, attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved and adopted. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members NAYS: ABSENT: City Clerk The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this day of , 1987. Mayor of the City of Bernardino Approved as to form: ~~~ City Att rney 5/13/87 ITV OF SAN eiRN 01 NO PL NI~G OEPARTMEN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE NOTICE OF DETERMINATION , ,........., ""lI ,........., SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES D 1416 NINTH STREET, ROOM 1311 2 CITY OF SAN BERNAROINO SACRAMENTO, CA. 95814 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 0 a: 300 NORTH D ST REET, 31'd FLOOR t- CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ... SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92418 1X1175 WEST 5th STREET '---" SAN BERNARDINO, CA, 92415 '---" ( PROJECT NAME: Change of Zone No. 86-11 ) PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: A City initiated proposal for Annexation No. 339 to zone the area C-M, Commercial- Manufacturing. '!'he 29.4 acre site is bounded on the east by Tippecanoe Avenue, on the south by the 1-10 freeway, on the west by Orchard Drive, and on the north by the existing City limit boundary..... - _..' ":-::::1 :_...: -. - .. .- rv ~ -" .- ',. :::; . .'~ THIS IS TO ADVISE THAT THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO HAS MADE THE FOLLOWING DETERMlrit ION REGARDING THE PROJECT DESCRIBED ABOVE: I. THE PROJECT HAS BEEN IXlAPPROVED, DDENIED. 2. THE PROJECT OWILL, [jWILL NOT, HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, 3, DAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CEOA. IX) A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS PREPAREO FOR THIS PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CEOA, A COPY OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS AVAILABLE FOR PU8LIC REVIEW IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY HALL, 300 NORTH "D" STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92814. 4. A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS DWAS, ~WAS NOT, ADOPTED FOR THIS PROJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~JeA-Uc. ?d#-- (714) 383 -5057 SECRETAR'\TALER1E C. ROSS, Assistant PlannlPfio Retei~ed for Fi line) TELEPHONE \.. ~ MAY '01 sky ERC. fORM E EXHiCilf ;\ It ~..... ,--fleD' /' c " I ~ ,z4 ~~ "_Ol.-AL.I~ e\..VD. _ \,...' ..", t" ..~.:_,: .... . .'-. . '1 ~ )\ "~ , I .~t>. J:-I0 F/CE~W^Y ~ ~I.' 'If I, I: LOGA"'IDN ...-.:.' \, MAP . ~;:."..:'.- ....... ..-, . ..,~- . __0 " _.'. H ~~ ~A' 5~.:1 AClDf'T15P' ,. 7/.''; .",_TN6_' 0 , A_A: o.D44J -.:::I.MaL." ._b"IItV"M'~~'1'I/III 1111111/111 ".,.",.D lfY': ""tc:l-lAl!'\... C\JeLll::T"" t::,.__ rr" I..OU !dD:k1b. 11116T.: 3-IC-b<.lo FIL€ Ala lZ.O\-~\t:. :If '!5~ ell'( of ~N~RDINO PU&lJG NlII(JtW _ttTM~ D1~"'f!'.~.'14r DI~/~OAi /tf5AL. ,.,."..1rtY fll5G7'10,J LOCATION: J,/~-nI '" ,fEDi.a.lp~ F'<<UJAY Wt!~.,. O~ /iP/'I6C.NIOI6 AVE: At-ltolEO:)<AlION €?<Ulerr ''ef