HomeMy WebLinkAbout67-Planning
A .
u
-
- 4.
4
..
0119 OF SAN BERNARDIIQ - REQUIOr FOR COUNCIL ACOoN
, From:
Brad L. Kilger
Director of Planning
Subject:
Appeal of Planning Commission
Denial of Conditional Use Permit
No. 89-l6
Dept: Planning
Date: July l2, 1989
Mayor and Council Meeting of
July l7, 1989, 2:00 p.m.
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Continued from July 5, 1989 Council meeting to July l7, 1989 Council
meeting.
Racommended motion:
That the hearing be closed; and that the Mayor and Council deny the
appeal and deny Conditional Use Permit No. 89-l6. (Supports the
Planning Commission's action.)
or
That the hearing be closed; that the Mayor and Council uphold the appeal
and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-l6 with parking variance sub-
ject to revised Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval (Attachment
"A"); and, adopt the Finding of General Plan Consistency.
.((5B~ ~
Brad L. Kilger, Director of Plannincr..hone'.
Contact person: 1"
384-5057
Supporting data attached:
Staff Report
Ward:
1
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
n/a
Source: (Acct, No,)
(Acct, DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
I 75.0262
Agenda Item NO.-U~
-
4 ~
L
-
- -
...
~
CITC)OF SAN BERNARDlrG - REQUQr FOR COUNCIL AcohbN
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Conditional
Use Permit No. 89-l6
Mayor and Council Meeting of July l7, 1989
This appeal was continued from the July 5, 1989 Council meeting to
the July l7, 1989 Council meeting so that Findings for the variance
could be developed. These revised Findings are based on evidence
presented by the applicant which was not available to staff prior
to the Planning Commission meeting of June 6, 1989, when the Com-
mission voted to deny the appeal. The attached revised Findings
(Attachment "A") are based on that supplied evidence. (See original
Council Action Request Staff Report.)
75-0264
_ Ll
Jl
..JI.
-4S
~
~
o
o
o
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 89-l6
FINDINGS of FACT
\...
r
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE 7/l7/89
PAGE
variance Findinas
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property involved which do not apply
~o other property in the same district and neighborhood
~n that the layout for the parking lot prevents the
strict compliance with the parking ordinance provisions.
2. The variance is necessary for the preservation of a
substantial property right of the applicant in that the
development of the upgrading of the facilities would be
prevented because of a loss of structural enhancements
due to the inability of providing the required three
parking spaces.
3. The granting of the requested variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or injur-
ious to property and improvements in the district and
neighborhood in which the property is located in that
there will be adequate provisions for public access to
serve the subject variance proposal with two proposed
means of ingress and egress and provisions for adequate
on site circulation.
4. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the
objectives of the General Plan in that adequate parking
is provided for the proposed development.
Conditional Use Permit Findinas
5. See variance Finding No.4.
6. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which it is proposed to be located in that it is com-
patible with existing commercial uses in the vicinity.
7. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow for the full development of the
proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the partic-
ular area nor the peace, health, safety and general
welfare in that the number of parking spaces provided is
adequate for the proposed development.
8.
The traffic generated by the proposed use
impose an undue burden upon the streets and
designed and improved to carry the traffic in
and that adequate parking is provided.
will not
highways
the area,
--
.!1.
jIo,
.~
.
x
....I..
,
000 0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 89-l6
FINDINGS of FACT
\..
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE 7/l7/89
PAGE
9. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the peace,
health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of
the City of San Bernardino in that the spirit and intent
of the parking code is being met.
M&CCAGENDA:CUP89l6
L1
1
/~
CIO OF SAN' BERNARDIOD ,- REQuOsT FOR COUNCIL AOION
From: Brad K. Kilger
Director of Planning
Dept: Planning
!l8g~l'dflQF PLANNING COMMISSION I S
~~:-~V~NrAL OF CONDITIONAL USE
l.'-~ ..,.,)~f~TJ Q-,9'-16
I."''''''' J..'c-.
.,,"."
Date: June 21, 1989
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
July 13, 1989, 2:00 p.m.
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
No previous Council action.
Recommended motion:
That the hearing be closed; and that the Mayor and Council
deny the appeal and deny Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16.
(Supports the Planning Commission's action.)
OR
~
That the hearing be closed; that the Mayor and Council uphold
the appeal and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16 with
parking variance subject to revised Findings of Fact and
Conditions of Approval; and, adopt the Finding of General Plan
Consistency contained in Attachment "0".
~ f'~i3 C).L ~
Brad L. ilg Sj9f1ature ~
Contact person:
Brad L. Kilger
Phone: (714) 384-5057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report
Ward:
1
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: N/A
Source: (Acct, No,)
(Acct, Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
75-0262
A!lenda Item No
~7
-
-
-
ClTOoF SAN BERNARDI to - REQUEOr FOR COUNCIL AC"Q)N
STAFF REPORT
,.
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-16 KENTUCKY FRIED
CHICKEN ADDITION AT 477 SOUTH "E" STREET
REOUEST
The applicant, Carlson Design and Construction Company
representing Collins Food International, requests that the
Mayor and Council reconsider and approve the application for
the construction of an addition to an existing drive-through
restaurant (Kentucky Fired Chicken) with a variance regarding
the required parking.
BACKGROUND
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16 is an application to con-
struct a 418 square foot addition to an existing l,500 square
foot drive-through restaurant and approval of a variance from
Code sections 19.56.020 regarding required parking.
The restaurant is located on the east side of "E" Street
north of Mill Street at 477 South "E" Street.
The proposal
June 2, 1989,
is allowed
Designation.
provisions of
(CEQA) .
is consistent with the General Plan adopted on
in that the use of a drive-through restaurant
in the CG-l, General Commercial-One Land Use
The proposed addition is exempt from the
the California Environmental Quality Act
The site is located on "E" Street about 100 feet north of
Mill Street. These are both well traveled streets with "E"
Street having over 18,000 trips per day and Mill Street
having over 21,000 trips per day. There is nothing ex-
ceptional ~bout the size, shape, topography or circumstances
of the site which is not applicable to other parcels in the
vicinity. At the Development Review Committee meeting of May
4, 1989, there was discussion of the potential for on-sight
traffic congestion resulting from inadequate parking. The
proposal provides the 29 spaces which is three short of the
required minimum.
The applicant is basing their
City's parking requirements for
too high. Their evidence is
appeal on the fact that the
drive-through restaurants is
a sampling of other cities
75.0264
4..
...L
,J..
.
0' 0 0
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITOINAL USE
PERMIT 89-16 - KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN ADDITION AT 477 SOUTH
"E" STREET
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEETING - July 3, 1989
PAGE 2
o
city's parking requirements for drive-through restaurants is
too high. Their evidence is a sampling of other cities
requirements in Southern California, which generally have a
requirement of one parking space for every 100 square feet of
gross floor area. The city of San Bernardino's requirement
is one space for every 60 square feet of gross floor area. In
addition, they have provided evidence that the peak parking
needs of the Kentucky Fried Chicken with the new addition
would only be around seven spaces.
The general policy behind parking standard requirements is to
provide a sufficient number of parking spaces to accommodate
the number of vehicles that ordinarily are likely to be
attracted to the development in question. It is not desired
to have a development with inadequate parking area or parking
area, far in excess of its needs. The former situation may
lead to traffic congestion or parking violations on adjacent
streets. The latter situation wastes money as well as space
that could more desirably be used for valuable development or
landscaping. In this case evidence has been presented to
indicate that the City'S standard is erroneous, and that the
intent of the standard has been achieved. This evidence was
not available to the Planning Commission on June 6, 1989,
when they voted 5 to 0 to deny the Conditional Use Permit
and variance request.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OPTIONS:
The Mayor and Council may deny the appeal and deny
Conditional Use Permit 89-l6 with variance as per Planning
commission's recommendation; or uphold the appeal and approve
Conditional Use Permit 89-l6 with variance, subject to the
appropriate revisions of Findings of Fact, Conditional Use
Permit findings and variance findings.
Prepared by: John Montgomery, AICP
Principal Planner
for Brad L. Kilger, Director of Planning
Attachments: A
B
Letter of Appeal to the Mayor and Council
statement of Official Planning Commission
Actfon '
Public Hearing Notice
General Plan Consistency Finding
C
D
PCAGENDA:CUP89-l6APPEAL
~
AOCHMENT "A" 0
o
CRRLSON OESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CO.
p, 0, box 819. anaheim. ca 92815-0819 state license no,261205 8-1
2301 e,winston rd..anaheim ca 92806-5542 phone(714) 776-3104
June 8, 1989
.,~~~" ,-. "..
i\t,-_<' '-
T: J'.:", i 3 F ~ :~':~
City Clerk
City of San Bernardino
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Gentlemen:
Conditional Use Permit 89-16
Kentucky Fried Chicken
477 S. "E" Street
We hereby appeal the decision of the Planning Commission rendered on 6/6/89 for
the above-referenced project. Our check for the amount of $75 is enclosed. Our
appeal is based upon the following:
1. Parking requirements for the project are 1 space per 60 sq.ft. of gross floor area
(1882 f 60 = 31.36 or 32 spaces). This code has been in place prior to the pro-
liferation of drive-thru restaurants. The code was originally created for drive-
in restaurants where customers park and are served food in their cars for con-
sumption on the premises. Cars could be on the premises from 30-60 minutes or
longer and, as such, parking requirements were high. Drive-thru restaurants are a
different type of business. They are a convenience for customers who do not
wish or are unable to leave their cars to purchase food for consumption off
premises.
We have enclosed a random sampling of parking requirements for other cities
located in Southern California. This sampling suggests that many other cities
have updated their requirements for drive-thru restaurants to reflect the fact that
restaurants with drive-thru facilities derive approximately 5096 of their total sales
from the drive-thru, and, as such, their onsite parking needs are far less than
that of a conventional restaurant without a drive-thru.
2. We have enclosed a letter from Collins Foods International who is the operator of
this store and three other KFC units in the city of San Bernardino. This letter
provides information on this store and the KFC operation in general. The exhibits
at the end of the letter indicate current sales per day, projected sales per day,
and the incremental increase per day. Sales are indicated on an hourly basis and
the type of sale. The sales charts clearly indicate that with the anticipated 16%
increase in revenue, a total of 123 cars per day would park onsite over a 10-
hour period--assuming that all customers arrive in an automobile. During the
busiest single hour of the day (5-6 pm), the maximum number of cars on the lot
at anyone time would be 7.
3. The primary purpose of the proposed remodel is to upgrade a facility which has
operated for 11 years since its last facelift. The intent is to upgrade the
exterior of the building with a new color theme, add a considerable amount of
landscaping, and renew the customer areas of the interior including the addition
of new rest rooms which meet all handicap requirements.
GENERAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL ANO REFRIGERATION CONTRACTORS
.
c.
o
o
o
City of San Bernardino
June 8, 1989
Page 2
Referencing to the random sampling of various cities' parking requirements, we feel
that the city of San Bernardino's code is too stringent--especially as applies to a
KFC. Based upon actual studies conducted by CFI and KFC of more than 200
KFC's in Southern California, we submit that we have a minimum of twice the
number of parking spaces that will be utilized for the projected increase in business.
We would ask that the Mayor and City Council give this project and analysis consid-
era tion.
Sincerely,
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
RWM:jm
enclosures Check 1144882 $75
Parking Codes (per city)
Collins Foods letter dated 6/5/89
.
ce 8, 1989
CITY
ORANGE COUNTY
Buena Park
Anaheim
Orange
Tustin
Fullerton
Costa Mesa
Irvine
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Artesia
Carson
Commerce
Culver City
Los Angeles
Santa Fe Springs
Santa Monica
Long Beach
San Fernando
Torrance
Manhattan Beach
Long Beach
Temple City
Whittier
Duarte
DESERT CITIES
Cathedral City
Coachella
Desert Hot Springs
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Escondido
National City
Oceanside
poway
Santee
OTHER COUNTIES
Simi Valley
Chino
Hemet
Loma Linda
Ojai
Victorville
Napa
Upland
PA!!~DE:3 (Per O!.
o
CODES
REQUIRED SPACES
(Based Upon 2200 sq.ft.)
10 Per 1000 sq.ft. of gross floor area
10
10
1
1
1
1
22
,22
22
18
22
22
22
Per 1000 sq. ft.
Minimum or 1 per 100 sq.ft.
For every 3 seats
Per 100 sq.ft. gross area
Per 100 sq.ft. gross area
Per 100 sq.ft. gross area
gross
1 Per 3~ fixed seats or 1 every 35 sq.ft.
plus 1 per employee on peak shift
10 Minimum, 1 per 100 sq.ft. gross
1 Per 4 fixed seats
13 Per thousand
1 Per 500 sq.ft. gross area
1 Per 35 sq.ft. of public area,
1 Per 75 sq.ft. gross
5 Plus 1 for each 3 seats
1 Per 100 sq. ft. gross
1 Per 100 sq. ft. gross
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross floor area
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross floor area
1 Per 100 sq. ft. gross floor area
of seating area,
20
22
14
29
5
restrooms excluded, 10 minimum 18
30
23
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
1 Per every 45 sq.ft. of serving area or every 5 seats,
whichever is greatest
1 For each 5 fixed seats, plus 1 per each 35 sq.ft. non-
fixed seating plus 1 per each 2 employees at peak
1 For each 5 seats or 1 per 35sq.ft. seating area
15
21
19
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross area
10 Minimum or 1 per 100 sq.ft. gross area
15 Minimum, 1 for each 3 seats or 1 for each 45 'sq.ft dining,
whichever is greatest
1 Per 7 seats, plus 1 per employee
1 Per 100 sq.ft. of gross floor area
22
22
18
12
22
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross 22
1 Per 100 sq.ft. of gross floor area, plus 1 per each 2 employees 22
1 Per 100 sq.ft. of gross floor area 22
25 Spaces 25
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross 22
1 Per 100 sq. ft. gross 22
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross 22
1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross 15
.
c.
o
0,
P,.2/5
o
oJ......,....""" OJ' ...,...,
c:p
COLLIN. ..000. INT.ANATIONAL., INC.
June 5, 1989
Mr. Bob Merriam
Carlson Design & Construction Co.
2301 E. Winston Road
Anaheim, CA 92806-5542
Subject: Parking Needs and Traffic Circulation Study
KFC ,236 - Mill , 'E' Street
Dear Mr. Merriam:
This letter is provided to share some of the knowledge which has been
,accumulated by Collins Foods International, Inc. (CFI) concerning the
parking circulation impact for its Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFe)
restaurant concept. ClI i. the largest international franchisee for
the Kentucky Fried Chicken concept with 207 KFC restaurants. With over
twenty years of experience, CFI has gathered a significant amount of data
on all aspects of its restaurant concepts. This information specifically
pertains to the parking issues you appear concerned with as voiced to our
construction department.
We expect the information contained herein will allow you to more properly
understand the on-site circulation and parking issues for'the proposed re-
build of our KFC restaurant at the property located at 477 S. 'E' Street
in So. San Bernardino, California.
KFC, monitoring the sales statistics of its restaurants through the use
of computers, is able to assemble data establishing actual parking require-
ments, number of cars on the property, and average time spent on site by
each customer. Each sale is recorded at the time of the transaction,
indicating when the customer ate at the restaurant, used the drive-thru
facility, or carried the product out.
This data indicates that the average service time to receive an order,
either going into the restaurant or through the drive-thru, is approxi-
mately 2.5 minutes. In servicing a drive-thru customer the time spent
looking at the menu and deciding on their order averages closer to 3.5
minutes, this indicates that l7.l4 drive-thru customers can be processed
per hour with no more than one or two car stacking occuring at any time,
and the maximum amount of time a drive-thru customer will be on the site
should be no more than 6 minutes. Customers who walk in and carry meals
out should not spend more than 10 minutes on our site. Our experience
shows that the typical dine in customer consists ot a party of 2 or more
patrons and the Average time spent on site as a sit-down customer is 24
minutes.
ax.CUTlVII__
1 88S., w... ....".,....... 1!!I0000evat'G.l.o. AntIal... Calif 01""" .ooSS ra 1 3.J 827.2300
MAIL ACC"&&8: ",Q."x .;20... u......... C_.. ..oce.
T"." .?4sal!l COl.UN6 UiA "AX ",,:11 aa.S?l!l1!l
. ....-'""
. JO 5, 1989 0
Mr. Bob Merriam
Carlson Design & Construction Co.
Page 2
o
o
Tne restaurant is located on South 'E' Street. As the typical traveller
frequenting KFC is on their way home, ne or sne'will enter the site off
of South 'E'Street, either go througn the drive-thru, or into restaurant
and exit.
To determine the potential traffic impact at this site it is important to
consider the information on our existing restaurant prior to a rebuild.
This current data establishes the existing traffic impact. The existing
KFC restaurant is a free-standing pad having 29 parking spaces, drive-thru
and 22 seating. The existing store has a sales volume of almost a half
million dollars annually.
Using the existing store as a base indicator and our twenty year plus
experience with the Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant concept, we have
projected an increase in weekly transactions of 220 or a 16\ increase in
sales. We have projected as shown in Exhibit I the ,amount of incremental
traffic to be generated when the new KFC restaurant is completed. The
ratio of customer types are divided by the following proporations: 45\
for drive-thru, 26\ for carry-out, and 29' for dine-in customer. This
equates to 99 drive-thru, 57 carry-out, and 64 dine-in customers daily.
Exhibit I pertains to the rebuilt restaurant with respect to the increase
in traffic circulation while on the site. What's significant is the total
projected cars during the peak hours of service occupying the site at any
one time. Exhibit I shows a maximum of 7 ears from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m.
What is important to keep in mind about KFC is that our customers are
predominantly adults who frequent the drive-thru facility to purchase a
feast for their family or acquaintances. Most,tranaactions are purchased
for groups of four or more, thus, the reason for less parking needs when
compared to other fast food concepts due to our higher ticket per customer
averages. Additionally, the KFC concept itself doe. not cater to teenagers
who are more inclined to linger on the site fraternizing with one another.
Due to this, KFC enjoys a low requirement for parking and the, resulting
traffic impact is light while generating a substantial sales volume. Con-
sequently, the KFC concept is attractive for most developers and communities
alike.
We hope this information assists you in evaluating our submission. If there
is any other information that we can provide you in order to make your
decision do not hesitate to let us know.
Sincerely,
C%:Wf6S. ~;;;;;;;;;;;~
Chris B. Planders
Real Estate Manaqer
CBP/pm
~c: J. Henson
W. Scarpino
.0'
o
o
FOOTNOT~1 _ The averaqe transaction for a drive-thru customer occurs
every 3.5 minutes.
_ The averaqe time spent on site for a earry-out customer
is 10 minutes.
_ The average time spent on site as a dine-in customer is
24 minutes.
o
J'-" __ Q;) ............
r-..c.""'"
o.
o
o
o
C(/I2fl..P/T' S4c..d:.) ,P~)Z ~4Y
EXHIBIT I
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN . 236
------------------------------------------------------
T1.. Tran.-
a:! Day ac~:l.an.
To~.l
Drive
Thru
Carry
Ou~
Dine
In
193.0 4:5.0 " 26.0 " 29.0 "
10. cae 1.0X 1.9 0.9 0.:5 0.6
11.00 7.0X 13.:5 6.1 3,:5 3.9
12.00 14.0X 27.0 12.2 7.0 7.8
13.00 5.0" 9.7 4.3 2.:5 2.8
14.00 :5.0X 9.7 4.3 2.5 2.8
1:5.00 6.0" 11.6 :5.2 3.0 3.4
16.00 9.0X 17.4 7.8 4.:5 5.0
17.00 19.0X 36.7 16.5 9.5 10.6
18.00 16.0X 30.9 13.9 8.0 9.0
19.00 11.0" 21.2 9.6 :5.5 6.2
20.00 6.0X 11.6 :5.2 3.0 3.4
21.00 1.0X 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.6
100.0X To~al 86.9 50.2 56.0
Dr:l.ve Carry Dine Ta~al
T:I._ Thru Ou~ In Park:l.ng
01 Day Parking Parking Park1ng
------------------------------------------------------------------------
17.1/Hour 15/Hour 2.5/Hollr
10.00 0.0:5 0.03 0.22 0
11.00 0.36 0.23 1.:57 2
12.00 0.11 0.47 3.13 4
13. cae 0.25 0.11 1.12 2
14. cae 0.2:5 0.17 1.12 2
1:5.00 0.30 l/l.20 1.34 2
16.00 0.46 0.30 2.01 3
17.0.0 0.97 0.64 4.2:5 6
18.00 0.81 0.54 3.58 :5
19.00 0.56 0.37 2.46 3
20.00 0.30 0.20 1.34 2
21.00 0.05 0.03 0.22 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To~.l
AVERAGE
5.1
0.46
3.3
0.30
22.4
2.l/l4
31
3
.;...... __ C::II':;lI .........
,....~/4
.
0'
o
o
o
fdD:rI!~~i) -'\9' 4~ Is.~ j)JIIY
EXHIBIT II
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN . 236
Time Trana- Drive Carry Din..
~ Day ac:1.icma Total. Thru Out. In
------------------------------------------------------
224. a 45.0 " 26.a " 29.0 "
10.00 1.0" 2.2 1.0 0.6 11I.6
11.00 7.0" 15.7 7.1 4.1 4.5
12.00 14.ax 31." 14.1 8.2 9.'1
13. alii 5.0% 11.2, 5.0 2.9 3.2
14.00 5.0% 11.2 5.11I 2.9 3.2
15.00 6.0X 13.4 6.0 3.5 3;9
16.00 9.0X 20.2 9.1 5.2 5.8
17.00 19.0X 42.6 19.2 11.1 12.3
la.llla 16.0X 35.8 16.1 9.3 la."
19.00 11.0" 24.6 11.1 6.4 7.1
20.00 6.0" 13.4 6.0 3.:5 3.9
21.0a 1.0% 2.2 1.a 0.6 0.6
100.0" Tot.al 100.8 58.2 65.0
Drive e.rry Dine To1.a.1.
Tille Tbru Out. In Park:l.n~
01 Day Park:l.ng Parkin~ 'arking
------------------------------------------------------------------------
17.1/Hour 15/Hour 2.5/Hour
10.00 0.06 0.04 a.26 0
11.00 0.41 0.27 1.82 3
12.00 0.83 0.54 3.64 5
13.00 0.29 0.19 1.30 2
14.00 0.29 0.19 i.30 2
15.00 0.35 0.23 1.56 2
16.00 a.53 0.3:5 2.34 3
17.00 1.12 0.74 4.94 7
18.00 0.94 0.62 4.16 6
19.a0 a.65 0.43 2.86 4
20.00 0.35 0.23 1.56 2
21.00 a.a6 0.04 0.26 0
------------------------------------------------------------------~-----
Tot.al
AVERAGE
:5.9
a.54
3.9
a.3:5
26.0
2.36
36
3
,~
,
o.
o
o
o
1~"""eN'J?l!J~ IV~09Sc.
EXHIBIT III
KEHTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN " 236
1:1.. 1ran.- Dr1ve Carry Din.
01 Day ac:t.:1on. Tot.al T!lru Out. In
------------------------------------------------------
31.0 45.0 X 26.0 X 29.0 X
10.00 1.0" 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1
11.00 7.0X 2.2 1.0 0.6 0.6
12.00 14.0X 4.3 2.0 1.1 1.3
13.00 S.0X 1.6 e.1 0.4 e.4
14,00 15.0" 1.6 0.7 0.4 0.4
15.00 6.0X 1.9 0.8 0.5 0.5
16.00 9.0" 2.8 1.3 0.7 0.8
17.00 19.0" 5.9 2.7 1.5 1.7
18.00 16.0" 5.0 2.2 1.3 1.4
19.00 11.0X 3.4 1.5 0.9 1.0
20.00 6.0X 1.9 e.8 0.5 0.S
21.00 1.0" 0.3 0.1 e.l 0.1
100.0" Tot.al 14.0 8.1 9.e
Drive Carry Din. Tot.a.1
I Ti.. T!lru Out. In Parlc1ng
I 01 Day Parking Parking Parlc:&.ng
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 17.1/Hour 15/Hour 2. 51 Hour
I
I
I UI.00 0.01 0.01 0.814 81
11.00 0.06 0.04 0.25 0
I 12.00 0.11 0.e8 0.150 1
I 13.00 0.814 ..03 0.18 81
I 14.00 ..04 0.03 0.18 0
I 15..0 0.05 0.03 0.22 .
I 16.00 0.01 0.05 0.32 0
I 17.00 0.16 ..10 0.68 1
I 18.01l1 0.13 1lI.llI9 0.58 1
I 19.01l1 Ill. 09 0.06 0.40 1
21l1.00 0.05 0.03 0.22 0
I 21.00 0.01 0.01 e.04 0
I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tot.al 0.8 0.5 3.6 5
AVERAGE 0.e7 0.05 0.33 0
J
1
-
~
c~
.0 0
c~ty of San Bernard~no
o
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
PROJECT
Number:
Conditional Use Permit 89-16
Applicant:
ACTION
Carlson Design
Meeting Date: June 6, 1989
x
Approved Adoption of Negative Declaration and
Request Subject to the Following Findings of
Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard
Requirements.
Denied.
Other.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property involved which do not apply
to other property in the same district and neighborhood
in that the 0.42 acre parcel is flat and rectangularly
shaped rather than irregularly shaped.
2. The variance is not necessary for ,the preservation of a
substantial property right of the applicant in that the
property may still be used in a manner which is on a par
with uses allowed to other property owners in the
vicinity.
3. The granting of the requested variance could be detri-
mental to the public welfare in that it could cause
circulation problems and traffic hazards.
4. The granting of the variance would be contrary to the
General Plan objective of ensuring that developments
provide adequate parking, either on-site or in con-
solidated parking facilities.
b.
-
.
c.
CITY OF SAN BERNAl ":NO r'i
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL P~ING
Conditional Use Permit 89-16
Page 2
COMMISS~N ACTION
o
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS:
5. See Variance Finding No.4.
6. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which it is proposed to be located in that it is
compatible with existing commercial uses in the vicinity
7. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
not adequate to allow the full development of the
proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare in that the site cannot accommodate the
required number of parking spaces for the proposed
amount of gross floor area.
8. The proposed site plan does not provide adequate parking
in that it does not satisfy the Municipal Code parking
requirement for drive-through restaurants.
9. The granting of this Conditional Use Permit would be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino in that the
inadequate amount of parking could cause circulation
problems and traffic hazards.
VOTE
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
Brown, Lopez, Nierman, Sharp, Stone
None
None
Cole, Corona, Lindseth
I, hereby,
accurately
Commission
certify that
reflects the
of the City of
this Statement of Official Action
final determination of the Planning
San Bernardino.
Director of Planning
Name
cc: Project Property Owner
Project Applicant '
Building and Safety Dept.
Engineering Division
.
o.
A~HMENT "C"
o
Public Hearing Notice
A notice of the appeal hearing was sent to the applicant and
property owners within 500 feet of the subject property at
least 10 days prior to the hearing as per Municipal Code
Section 19.81.020. A copy of this notice is attached.
o
..
c.
o
o
o
OFFI'CIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE CITY OF SAN' BERNARDINO
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
APPEAL OF Conditional Us~ Permit 89-16
THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THE FOLLOWING ITEM HAS BEEN APPEALED TO THE
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL BY the applicant
,SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16 with Variance WARD #
of Parking Standard. 1
PROPERTY
LOCATION : 477 South liE" Street
PROPOSAL: To construct 'a 418 square foot addition to the Kentucky
Fried Chicken drive-through restaurant and to construct
a 29 space parking lot, 3 less than required 32
minimum spaces.
PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 NORTH "0" STREET
SAN BERNARDINO, CA,92418
\.. HEARING DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, July 5, 1989, 2:00 p.m.
'A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT CITY
HALL, IF YOU WOULD LIKE FlJRTHER INFDRMATION ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC
HEARING, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN PERSON OR BY PHONING
(714) 384-,5057.
THANK YOU,
i., 1"4 "Y
.4
.
Ul
..
c- 6TACHMENT -0"0
r- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
CASE
FACT AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
o
DEPARTMENT "'I
FINDINGS of
...
'"
r-
General Plan Consistency Findinq
The Planning Department has investigated Conditional
Use Permit No. 89-16 and has determined that the
proposed addition is consistent with the General
Plan adopted by the Mayor and Council on June 2, 1989.
'"
~
NOV. 1'80
. .
~
CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
5
6-6~89
1
l&J
~
(,')
APPLICANT Collins
1800 W.
Orange,
OWNER, Carlson
P.O. Box
Anaheim,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-16
Foods International
Katella Avenue
CA 92667
Design
819
CA 92805
~
l&J
~
a
III
a:
....
ct
l&J
a:
ct
The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use ~ermit
under the authority of Code Section 19.26.010(B9) to con-
structa 418 square foot addition to an existing drive through
restaurant and a variance from Code Section 19.56.020 (f)
regarding required parking.
The 0.42 acre site is located at 477 South "E" Street.
EXISTING
LAND USE
Drive throuh rest.
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
I.P.D.
DESIGNATION
CG
CG
CG
CG
CG
PROPERTY
Subject
North
East
South
, West
ZONING
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A ( [3 YES )
HAZAJ!D ZONE UlNO ZONE Gel NO OZONE B SEWERS oNO
HIGH FIRE DYES AIR PORT NOISE I DYES REDEVELOPMENT, Gd YES
HAZARD ZONE liJ NO CRASH ZONE EilNO PROJECT ARE^ oNO
..J oNOT o POTENTIAL SIGN I FICANT Z 0 APPROVAL
ct APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
~ WITH MITIGATING ij 0 CONDITIONS
Zen MEASURES NO E,LR,
l&JC!) f] EXEMPT o E,LR REQUIRED BUT NO ....0 !9
2Z ....i5 DENIAL
Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
00 WITH MITIGATING ~2 0 CONTINUANCE TO
a::Z MEASURES (1)2
:;ii: 0
Z ONO o SIGNIFIC'ANT EFFECTS (,')
l&J SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E,R C, l&J
EFFECTS MINUTES a::
NOV. 1981 IUVISED "ULY 1'12
SKY
-
-
1
.
QA
o
o
o
.CITY OF SA~ BERNARDINO PLANNIN~EO~tWJ~ENT
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA I'1'ViI
HEARING DATE
PAG~ .
1. REOUEST
The applicant requests approval under the authority of Code
Section 19.26.020(B.9) to construct a 418 square. foot
addition to an existing 1,500 square foot drive through
restaurant and approval of a variance from Code section
19.56.020 (F) regarding required parking. The Municipal Code
requires 32 parking spaces for the proposed total square
footage. The site plan provides 29 spaces (See Attachment
C) .
2. SITE LOCATION
The 0.42 acre site is located on the east side
north of Mill Street and is further described
"E" Street (See Location Map; Attachment D).
of "E" Street
as 477 South
3. MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Except for the requested variance, the proposed project is
consistent with the Municipal Code and in conformance with
the General Plan as shown in Attachment A, The proposed
addition does not meet the required setback of 20 feet from
curb face of the Central City South Redevelopment Project
Area, but it is a continuation of an existing building.
frontage.
4. CEO A STATUS
The proposed addition is exempt
California Environmental Quality
1 (e).
5 ~ BACKGROUND
from
Act per
the provisions of the .
Section 15301 Class
Conditional Development Permit 879, an application for
approval to enlarge the existing restaurant at 477 South "E"
Street and to provide drive-through service, was approved by
the Planning Commission on August 15, 1978. The approved
.
Q'
o
o
o
.CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. . . CASE CUP89-l6
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING 0A'n
E
5
gross floor area was 1,464 square feet. and the required
number of parking spaces was 25. The parking requirement for
drive-through restaurants was the same at that time as it is
now: 1 space per 60 square feet of gross floor area.
On May 4,
approval
requested
1989, the Development Review Committee recommended
of the site plan subject to approval of the
variance by the Planning Commission.
6. ANALYSIS
Traffic Volumes on "E" Street and Mill Street
The existing traffic volume on the portion of "E" Street
where the site is located is 18,000 trips per day. The
traffic volume on the nearby portion of Mill Street is 21,000
trips per day. (Source: Technical Backaround Report:
February, 1988.)
At the Development Review Committee meeting of May 4, 1989,
the Police Department expressed a concern that a. tight
parking situation at this site could cause on-site traffic
congestion and traffic backing up at the entrance from "E"
Street. There are four (4) parallel parking spaces beside a
one-way drive aisle 16 feet and 7 inches in width at the rear
(east) .side of the site. Cars pulling into these spaces
could contribute to on-site traffic congestion. Traffic
backing up on to a heavily traveled street 115 feet from a
busy intersection has the potential to cause serious
problems.
size. Shape and Topoaraphv of the site
The 0.42 acre site is a flat, rectangular parcel of land.
There is nothing exceptional about size, shape, topography,
or circumstances .of the site which is not applicable to other
parcels in the vicinity.
Straiahtenina of the "E" Street Curb
The "E" street curb in front of the site is not straight.
Eventually, the street will be widened in order to provide a
uniform distance from the curb to the street centerline. The
proposed site plan accounts for the eventual street widening.
.J
.
o! 0 0 0
.CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. CASE CUP89-16
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
5
6-6-89
4
No parking spaces. are located within the setback from the
ultimate curb face.
CONCLUSION
The site is located on south "E" street approximately 100
feet north of the intersection of "E" and Mill Streets, a
very busy intersection of two well traveled streets. Approval
of the proposed site plan and the requested parking variance
could cause on~site traffic congestion during peak use hours,
leading to traffic backing up onto "E" Street and, thereby,
constituting a traffic hazard. There is nothing exceptional
about the size, shape, topography or circumstances of the
property in question to support approving the requested
variance.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff
tional
Fact.
recommends that the Planning Commission deny Condi-
Use Permit 89-16 subject to the following Findings Qf
.
oS ~4f W/LA-rpt
Scott Wright
Planner II
ATTACHMENT A - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance
ATTACHMENT B - Findings of Fact
ATTACHMENT C - Site Plan
ATTACHMENT D - Location Map
PCAGENDA:CUP89-160
CITY OF SAN BERNA
CONDITIONS
1
x
2
x
3
x
4
x
5
x
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
If Building Permits for the project described by this
approval have not been issued prior to adoption of the
General Plan, and the project described by this approval
is inconsistent with the adopted General Plan, then the
approval of this project shall be null and void.
Minor amendments to the plan shall be subject to
approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of
more than 10 percent of the square footage or a signi-
ficant change in the approved concept shall be subject
to (Planning commission) (Development Review Committee)
review and approval. Construction shall be in sub-
stantial conformance with the plans approved by the
Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or
Director of Planning.
Four.sets of Landscape Plans, along with the appropriate
fee, shall be submitted to the Enoineerina Department
for processing. No grading permits will be issued prior
to approval of landscape plans.
At all times the business will be operated in a manner
which does not produce obnoxious noise, vibration, odor,
dust, smoke, glare, or other nuisance.
Subject to the Conditions of the Department of Parks and
Recreation (attached).
In the event that this approval is legally challenged,
the city will promptly notify the applicant of any claim
or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the
matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City its officers,
agents and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The
applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any
costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required
by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his
obligation under this condition.
PCAGENDA
CUP89-16C
-
c.
ATT,orENT "B"
o
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FINDINGS of FACT
CASE rll1>IlQ_l h
AGENDA ITEM 5
HEARING DATE 6-6-89
PAGE _ b.
VARIANCE FINDINGS:
1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property involved which do not apply
to other property in the same district and neighborhood
in that the 0.42 acre parcel is flat and rectangularly
shaped rather than irregularly shaped.
2. The variance is not necessary for the preservation of a
substantial property right of the applicant in that the
property may still be used in a manner which is on a par
with uses allowed to other property owners in the
vicinity.
3. The granting of the requested variance could be detri-
mental to the public welfare in that it could cause
circulation problems and traffic hazards.
4. The granting of the variance would be contrary to the
General Plan objective of ensuring that developments
provide adequate parking, either on-site or in con-
solidated parking facilities.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS:
1.
See Variance Finding No.4.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
.land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which it ~s proposed to be located in that it is
compatible with existing commercial uses in the vicinity
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
not adequate to allow the full development of the
proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare in that the site cannot accommodate the
required number of parking spaces for the proposed
amount of gross floor area.
'\..
C' 0 0 0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 89-l6
FINDINGS of FACT~~~~?~'6~~E 6-6-:Q
PAGE 7
,
4. The proposed site plan does not provide adequate parking
in that it does not satisfy the Municipal Code parking
requirement for drive-through restaurants.
5. The granting of this Conditional Use Permit would be
. detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino in that the
. inadequate amount of parking could cause circulation
problems and traffic hazards.
PCAGENDA:CUP89-16F
lio...
NOV 1.80
.
c~
CITY
OF
SAN
BERNARDINO
CASE CUP 89-l6
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
5
0-0-89
8
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
""""l
COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL
1
x
Conditional Use Permit 89-l6 .shall be in effect fora
period of 12 months from the date of approval. However, if no
development has been initiated at the end of the 12 month
period, the application shall expire. Additional time may be
approved upon request of the applicant prior to expiration of
the 12-month period. Expiration Date: June 6, 1990.
2
x
PARKING:
a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of
29 standard off-street parking spaces.
b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two
inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as. approved
by the City Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and
have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any
building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway.
c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or
across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid
decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and
maintained along the property line so as to separate the
parking area physically from the residentially zoned
property provided such wall shall be three feet in height
when located within the required front or street side yard
setback. Where no front or street side yard is required,
such wall shall be three feet in height when located within
ten feet of the street line.
d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the
street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid
decorative wall or equivalent landscape berm not less than
three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along
the street side of the lot not closer to the street than
the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential
area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall
obscure the required front setback landscaping.
3
x
REFUSE ENCLOSURES:
Whenever refuse bins are located within or adjacent to a parking
area used by the public, they shall be enclosed by a decorative
wall six feet in height along the rear and sides and screened
gate(s) six feet in height along the front. The enclosure shall
.not be placed within the required front or street side yard
I...
~
..., Illy
"
.
C.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE CUP 89-l6
STANDARD
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
5
6-6-89
':J
setback area. Exact location and
to be determined by the Planning
Public Services Superintendent.
size of refuse enclosures
.Department and Division
...,
are
of
WALLS:
a.
Six~foot high solid decorative walls shall be
the north , south , east , and
peripheral ==== property lines. (Only those
"X" or check mark apply).
required on
west or
markedWith
4
x
LANQSCAPING:
The intent and purpose of this section is to prevent trees and
other landscaping from damaging public improvements.
a. Street trees must be installed at a minimum of 30 feet on
center. varieties and exact location shall be determined
by the Director of Parks and Recreation.
b. All required setbacks abutting a public right-of-way shall
be landscaped (except for walks and driveways which bisect
or encroach upon the required landscape area).
c.
d.
e.
lIo..
Four (4) copies of a landscape
material specifications) shall
Engineering Division for review and
plan (including
be submitted to
approval.
plant
the
All required landscaping shall be protected from parking
areas and shall be provided with automatic sprinkler
facilities which shall be maintained. in an operative
condition.
Interior planting shall be required and maintained equal to
at least five percent or ten percent of the open surfaced
parking area excluding the area of landscaping strip
required by subsection "b" and shall include at least one
tree for every five spaces ormajor fraction thereof.
Measurements shall be computed from the inside of perimeter
walls or setback lines.
f.
The required setback(s) from the north , south, ____,
east ____, west -X-- property line shall be densely
landscaped with mature trees, shrubs, and groundcover. A
____ -foot landscaped earthen berm shall be erected and
maintained within the setback along the above indicated
property line.
~
I..' Ik,
O.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
REQUIREMENTS
CASE CUP 89-16
5
6-f'-RQ
HI
STANDARD
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
,
5
x
ILLUMINATION:
a.
All lighting
directed away
right-of-way.
fixtures in
from adjacent
the parking
properties
areas shall be
and the public
6
x
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT:
a. Air conditioning and vent ducts shall be directed away from
any adjacent residential uses, and all sides of the
building shall be free of any external vents and mechanical
equipment including, but not limited to, conduits and
ducts.
b. All building-supported mechanical equipment (including roof
equipment, ladders and air conditioning and vent ducts)
shall be enclosed within the building's primary
architectural elements; independent screening devices shall
not be permitted.
c. All ground-supported equipment such as transformers and air
conditioners shall be located within the building and/or in
underground vaults.
d.
All utility service
shall be painted to
they are located.
boxes, connections and service lines
match the building exterior on which
e. All existing overhead utility services and wiring shall be
relocated underground.
f. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone.
water, sewer and Cable TV shall be provided for
underground, with easements provided as required, and
designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and
the utility provider. Telephone, Cable TV and/or security
systems shall be pre-wired in the structures.
Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall
be required (if applicable).
7
x
Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required
Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil
precipitation.
by the City
exposed to
8
x
During construction, the City Engineer may require
around all or a portion of the periphery of the site to
wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The
a fence
minimize
type of
\..
,
I." Illy
.
C'
CITY
r
-
OF
o 0
BERNARDINO
o
SAN
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
\...
r
CASE 89-l6
AGENDA ITEM 5
HEARING DATE 6-6-8Q
FOAGE 11
~
"'I
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
. .
9.
x
,0.
x
.1.
x
.2.
x
3.
4.
x
5.
I
x
16.
x
7.
x
\..
Submit plans prepared by a Registered
Architect or civil or Structural Engineer.
Submit a complete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a
Registered civil or Structural Engineer or Architect.
Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Fo~s
for non-residential buildings
including a signed compliance statement;
Submit calculations and structural
Registered Civil Structural Engineer
following items: TRUSSES
drawings, prepared
or Architect, for
by a
the
Submit floor plan of existing structure. Label all uses and
existing materials of construction.
x
Submit four complete sets of construction plans including:
a. Copy of conditions.
b.
Soils and
liquefaction report.
c. Energy Calculations.
d. Structural calculation.
Submit a preliminary
liquefaction
do so.
(soils.and geology with
report) prepared by a person licensed to
Submit a single line drawing of
all equipment, conduit and wire
service ground size. and grounding
the electrical service.
sizes and types. Show
.electrode.
Sho....
the
Submit panel schedule(s) and electrical plans.
Permit required for demolition of existing building(s) on site.
Submit a
system.
equipment
plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning
(Clearly identify the location and rating of the
and the sizes and material of all ducts, registers and
.J
I"S ...,
O.
CITY
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
'"
.
,
OF
o 0
BERNARDINO
o
....
SAN
CASE CUP 89-l6
AGENDA ITEM 5
HEARING DATE6-6-89
PAGE 12
~
18.
x
19.
x
20.
x
21.
x
22.
x
23. v
124. X
25. X
1
126. X
27. X
128. X
'"
..,
the location of all fire dampers). Show means of providing
mechanical ventilation as required by the 1982 Uniform Building
Code.
Submit gas pipe loads, sizing calculations and isometrics.
Provide a plot plan showing the location of the proposed seWer
system.
Submit a letter clearly indicating the intended use of all areas
of the building. List the materials to be used and the projects
produced giving the amount of each kept in the building. If the
building is used for more than one purpose, list all other uses.
Stibmit isometric plans of the cold and hot water and drain-waste
and vent systems.
Show compliance with Title 24 for the physically handicapped in
the following: REST ROOMS, EXIT RAMPS.
Submit plans approved by the County Health Department;
Indicate methods of compliance for sound attenuation (exterior,
interior party walls, floor/ceiling aSsembly, ceiling) as per
study, U.B.C., local or State Law.
Show compliance with requirements of high fire areas.
For structures located within high wind areas:
a. Design structure, including roof covering, using 20 p.s.f.
wind load.
City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's
Compensation Insurance.
Assessor's Parcel Number. l36-l91-04,24
Contractor's City license.
Contractor's State license.
Sewer capacity rights from Water Department, 384-5093, Neil
Thomsen.
School fees from Unified School District, 381-1179.
~
I"S ..y
. o.
o
o
o
,.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
""""l
CASE CUP 89-16
"
AGENDA ITEM 5
HEARING DATE. b-b-!l~
PAGE 13
""""l
other:
29.
x
DEPOSIT: $l60 PLAN CHECK
csjj8-3-88
DOC:PCAGENDA
DOCUMENTS. 2
"""
.-J
1.., .-,.
.
0'
.L.
o
o
o
,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
""""l
CASE CUP 89-l6
AGENDA ITEM 5
HEARING DATE 6-6-89
PAGE t 4
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
\...
~
"'l
,
30. ---1L
31.
x
32.
x
33.
x
34.
x
35.
x
36. X
l-
POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS
SECURI TY LI GHTI NG
Lighting levels on the exterior of building is to provide a minimum of one
(1) foot candle of "maintained" illumination on the parking surface from
dusk until the termination of business each operating day.
All exterior doors to building shall be equipped with an illumination
device capable of providing a minimum of one (1) foot candle of maintained
illumination at ground level during hours of darkness.
All exterior lighting devices are to be inaccessible to common reach or
climbing shall be protected by weather and vandalism-resistant and be
va1da1 resistant. All exterior lighting shall be projected so as not to
cast light onto adjoining properties.
A 11 roof openi ng s gi vi ng access to the buil di ng sh all be secured with
either iron bars, metal gates, stamped metal or shall be alarmed and meet
with approval of the Police Department.
Interior night lighting shall be maintained in those areas that are visible
from the street (ground floor only).
DOORS, LOCKS, AND WI NDOWS
S~nging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, solid
wood or metal doors shall be constructed or protected as follows:
a. Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness
of 1 3/4 inches.
b. Hollow metal doors shall be constructed of a minimum equivalent to six-
teen U. S. guage steel and have sufficient reenforcement to. maintain
the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is installed
such as reenforcement being able to restrict collapsing of the door
around the locking device.
c. Except when double cylinder dead bolts are utilized, any glazing uti-
lized within 40' of any door locking mechanism shall be constructed or
protected as follows: Fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant
gl azi ng or iron or steel gri 11 s of at 1 east 1/8" metal wi th the maxi mum
2" mesh secured. on the inside of the glazing may be utilized or the
glazing shall be covered with iron or steel bars of at least 1/2" round
or 1" x 1/4" flat metal, space not more than 5" apart and secured on
the inside of the glazing.
All swinging exterior wood and steel doors shall be equipped as follows:
~AY '84
S.H. FORM C
'AGE I 0' 1$
.
c.
o
o
o
,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE CUP 89-l6
AGENDA ITEM 5
HEARING DATE 6-6-89
PAGE 15
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
'-
r
.
"\
37.
x
a. A si ng 1 e or doub 1 e door sh all be equi pped wi th a double or si ng 1 Po
cylinder dead bolt. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of 1" and
be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack.
. b. The dead bolt shall have an embedment of at least 3/4" into the strike
receiving the projected bolt. The Cylinder shall have a cylinder
guard, a mi ni mum of fi ve pi n tumblers and shall be connected to the
inner portion of the lock by connecting screws of at least 1/4" in
diameter. The recommendation does not apply when panic hardware is
required or an equivalent device is approved by the Building Code.
Double doors shall be equipped as follows:
a. The active leaf of double doors shall be equipped with metal flush
bolts havi ng a mi ni mum embedment of 5/8" into the head and threshho1d
of the door frame. Double doors shall have an astraga1 constructed of
s tee 1, a mi ni mum of .125" thi ck whi ch wi 11 cover the openi ng between
the doors. Thi s astraga1 shall be a minimum of 2" wide and extended a
mi ni mum of 1" beyond the edge of the door to whi ch it is attached. The
astraga1 shall be attached to the outside of the active door by means
of we1di ng or wi th nonremovable bolts spaced apart on not more than 10"
centers. Hinges for outswinging doors shall be equipped with nonremo-
vab1e hinge pins or a mechanical inner lock to preclude removal of the
door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. Strike plates shall
be a mi ni mum of 3!" in 1 ength and secured to the jamb wi th screws a
minimum of 2!" in length.
Wi ndows:
38. --..X..-
a. All moveable windows shall be equipped with a locking device and shall
be constructed in a fashion to restrict them from being lifted out of
its track when in closed position. .
Garage type doors; rolling overhead, sOlid overhead, swinging, sliding or
accordion style.
a. The above-described doors shall conform to the following standards:
(1) Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of five-sixteenths (5/16)
inch in thickness with the locking hardware being attached to the
support framing.
(2) Aluminum doors shall be a mlnlmum thickness of .0215 inches and
riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18) inches on center along
the outside seams. There shall be a full width horizontal beam
attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot, or
pedestrian access, door framing within three (3) inches of the
strike area of the pilot or pedestrian access door.
~ ~
MAY '84 S,R. 'aRM C
PAGE Z 011&
-
0' 0 0 0
r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR.
CASE CUP 89-16
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.
AGENDA ITEM , 5
HEARING DA~~ 6-6-89
. PAG'" 16
'\..
39.
x
Open parking lots and carports shall be provided with a
maintained minimum of one Il) footcandle of light on the
parking surface during the hours of darkness. Lighting
devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism
resistant covers.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERN
DINO PU
Ie WORKS/ENGR.
CASE CUP 89-l6
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
5
6-6-89
17
Project
87,
15005;=
ON
Date: 5-3-89
Page ~ of ~ pages
Prepared By: ~GV&-Reviewed By:
A pp 1 i ca n t: C,If1(!5o/,/ P3/GN
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required,
t e app lcant 1S responsible for submitting the Engineering plans
directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior
to submittal of Building Plans.
Draina e and Flood Control
All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be
subject to requirements of the City Engineer; which may be bas.ed
in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood
Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all
necessary data relating to drainage and flood control.
A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any
drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to
mitigate downstream imp.acts or protect the development shall be
desi gned and constructed. at the developer 0 s expense, and
right-of-way dedicated as necessary.
_ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance
Rate. Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued
by the City Engineer shall be required.
_ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance
Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the
surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer.
_Comprehensi.ve storm drain Project No. is master planned in
the vicinity of your development. Th1S drain shall be designed
and constructed by your project unl ess your Engineer can
conclusively s.how that the drain is not needed to protect your
development or mitigate downstream impacts.
40.
LAll drainage from the development
approved public drainage facility.
drainage facilities and easements
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
shall be
I f not
shall be
directed
feasible,
provided
to an
proper
to the
JI1
C'O 0 0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/1NQIl
. . CASE CUP 89=-l6
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
F\
5
6-6-89
Project Description: c,v;:J 8t:1-/" 418 '3.r. ADD/7iolJ 7b 15"a:; 5'~
tl!J;1'lhdANr 0;-.1 e/~ 'e' Sr Alo.t!.l"H Pr 11/~ Sr.
Date: !2--.rBil Prepared By: Ilu-fr- Reviewed By;
Page ~ or ~ ~ages
41.
Gra.di ng
X--If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/
grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil
Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan
shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading
Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings".
unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance.
If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading
bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in
. accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code.
42.}<. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must
-be s.ubmi tted and approved pri or to issuance of a gradi ng permi t.
Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction
report shall be incorporated in the grading plan.
43. ,X_An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where
feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan
and shall conform to all requirements of Section lS.04-167 of the
Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The
on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
44.
X--^ r"ipraeal !l1semc"t
.if3.tlf"e'~'a 1 i r res; ~rQcil
pr-9fJesed ta crass lot
recorded to remove the
,hall be pee~"d'a pr;nr tn graeiAg plait
~F'a i nag!. dccess, ~t::wer. Glld/or park i fig is
li",~, :. a lot line adjustment shall be
interior lot lines.
45. x_the project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Ci ty Engi neer pri or to issuance of a gradi ng permi t. Submit 4
copies to the Engineering Division for checking.
46. ~An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with
the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical.
Utilities:
47.
X--Desi gn and construct all
accordance with City Code,
serving utility, including
and cable TV.
public utilities to serve the site in
City Standards and requirements of the
gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer
.
J
.J.
c. 0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR.
CASE CUP 89-16
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
o
AGENDA ITEM 5
HEARING DATE 6-6-~Q
PAGE 1
Project Description:
r.AJJ7 I1q-/~
.
Date: ~~;~
Page ~ of pages
Prepared By: nuJG---' Revi ewed By:
Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer
----facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing
such services in the area.
Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be
----constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer
Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings.
48. X
Utili.ty services shall be placed underground and easements
provided as required.
All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site.
----on either side of. the street shall be undergrounded in accordance
with Ordinance No. MC-601 (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 8B-65
(Non-subdivisions);
49. L-Existingutilities which interfere with new construction shall be
relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City
Engineer.
Sewers wi thi n pri vate streets or pri vate park ing lots will not be
maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to
City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction
Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can
be incorporated in the grading plan. where practical.
.
0'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/INQJI.
CASE cUP 89-l6
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAG
o-i-tl!:l
20
Project Descri pti on: CuP 84f-{ b
Date.: 7-3~fYI
Page -4- of 5"" jlages
Prepared By: I1uf:r- Revi elled By: _
Mapping
A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey ~i11 be required.
.
Improvement Completion
Street. se\~er, and drainage improvement plans for the entire
project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map.
If the required improvements are not completed
recordation of the Final/Parcel Ma;>. an improvement
accompanied by an agreement executed by the -developer
City.wil1 be required.
prior to
security
and the
If the required improvements are not completed prior to reCord-
ation of the Parcel Map, an improvement certificate shall be
placed upon the Map stating that they ~1i11 be completed upon
development. Applicable to parcel maps consisting of less than
5 lots only.
Required Engineering Permits:
50. X
51. X
Grading permit (if applicable).
On~siteimproyements construction permit (except buildings - see
Building and Safety).
Off-site improvements construction permit.
IL
C.
CITY. OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/DIQfl
CASE CUP 89-16-
STANDARD REQlIREMENTS ~~?N~I~~E 6-6:89
PAG
Project Descri pti on: WP aq-/f..
Prepared By: i'MG--Revi e\~ed By:
Da te; 5"- 3-8tf
Page ~ of &; pages
Applicable Engineering Fees:-
Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map.
Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements.
f'Ay If FeG TO THG CrTy /0 u,~ rvTi/1Zc= CoST 0;:= CJlDENIJI{,
''c'/ .5r~1' to phI/IDE /} lJI51/TNcE F:t!!.om -<f To ~= 43~
~:;II1rL.(_$ff ~ tJ,<l Liry'.5 5r.l1Ja'~ UNI/ J?Rtct:S.
~ rees ~ Sv!3.J€c., To CH1'fN6€ tvlntcvr Nonce'.
52. X
53. X
54.
x
55.
x
x
56.
57.
x
Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except
buildings; see Building and Safety).
Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required).
Bridge improvement fee in amount of S
Drainage fee. Exact amount of fee shall be determined by
Department of Building and Safety at time of application for
building permit.
Landscape Plan Revie~ Fee S 65.00
Traffic System Fee of S 12.35 per ~ehicle trip for City-wide
traffic mitigation. The total amount of the Traffic System Fee
shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer .at time of
application for building permit.
Street Light Energy Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a
period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map
recording.
A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to
maintain landscaping within the folloying areas:
.)
c'
SAN BERNARDINO CITY WATER DEPARTMENT'S
STAO'RD REQUIREMOS
o
Review of Plans: # t!f!t.V~ ~... L <;0
,~..
Location: 4-"'1 '1. ~.. VfC:; . "!lor}
Type of Construction: 416 ::At,pl:p~,( or... -t:::'II.l"lS 1'lfAJ ~~ """"J
Dwner/DeveloperC- J 111~ Fel!:lO~ ~rl"""'JJQtY'1
ENGINEERING: Na~~ X~j~":u- _J
58. ~.S.1. -.J~4l' "P~ I
59.r::;:K....Size of Main Adjacentto the Project J z," lu It ~I\ ~... - -1
60. })(. Pressure Regulator Suggested on Customer's Side on the Meter.
o Comments:
Date:
Approved:
Denied:
Continued:
Date:A\ ~\-=t
4/lfJe!f{
I '
o Subject to the rules.& regulations of the Water Department in effect at the time of application for water service.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name: ~i=1 Mn~
61. )(
o
o
Date: 4 ~
R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.
Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.
Air Gap Required at Service Connection.
o No 8ackflow Device Required.
Date: 1 J ~(~
(
Breakdown of ,Estimated Gallons Per Day:
J-i."11'f'y
And/or:
64..;.i!-- Proof of Purchase Must Be Submitted to the Water Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit.
o This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees Will Be Determined by Their Department.
;2'6 5/85
0',
.......-...................
,_, ,.... -. ....--
......~;.=;;;;;;
_.... _I." _...... ...,
'.' . '.h" ..
. '". . .....~ ,...... ... ,_ e. .., ".... ...... ..
:. :.:' ..,,," :.:.~,:;:;;"'.:.:.-;..":..;..:;..:';';;::.~-i~:-;:.:...;~:;:::~
._ '.'0" ...... ....., "...~_ ......_..........,.__..."
".... -...,.............---.-.. ....,....~ -,....
_,,'M ...........___ ................._,._~
.., ......' 1_...... _......,._ '-'..,...... ...___..
...... """ ''''' ..._._,',_" -.. __, ._.......,)0..
:~,';.'..:,.'::.';":.::..::::::....::....::..':..':':"::o;.-..:.'" ':'.:::.~
.. .........-.........-. ..-.-.-..-.......,
........ .-...... "-'. .. ...... .... - ...- ......
,....--.. .-........-,....--....----
..._ _. ,__ .....roo- _....... ._..._.._.
1.1.....'5..0.5:........ ...0 3~'~O"
,
I I I 1 ..
! r .1 '. J
i! II! ! i ,
.
iiOi ~
. #.1 j' ...-
:: : ~ !
-................-...-..... -..---...
_.......__..." ..._... ".Ift" ___"
'0:1 "OI13ft11&.SNO:3 , N!)IS~O NOS'.":I
i
~-
I
I j
I
I
, i
,
!
I
!
: ~
..,
,
I
-.'
.U t .1 ~ ..1
II =
..I
)
,,~
~-
~: ~ecS.~
I ~ ~
....=1' ~ ~
~ .-'(.
:. \ f
.. ""( 1_i
--;+- ...' .....,
. ~ tOE ~
f<-:.--!--T e' , I" -:-:_1-~r'- 1 i
:c--i ,! }--J~'?i~tl~~ Jl: I I L
I '~-~:~!,-~~.:Il' I; Jr;:~~.Bl:fL-:i.-{:-+-::;.-t ~I
.f :~ i -~: -€: e.. -I'", fl' ;r! fl li : - .. ~;; J!
I '1-"'''-'_ vr' f. _.~. ;. I. -- ~
---., :1 :: i . ~
I :, I ~. e- r :.. I :: I -~ 1(..-.. :. :i
! -.'~-0 ~1. ~!.~~ ~:~.I -iu;: '! .~:.,:il i .
I ~- ~ 1 - :Xi: ~~ e ,:
- I 1---"\ J;... i::" I
I' i ~~ g.:;:.D" ~ _i. !
! ~;_ ,::: -,! ___ .J ;; j , ..r: ::: . . '"' r==--;
1:! !.o-.--r..:- ~~;i! ..~, :'~\
, ,j> 'I \.
I ..~ · . .
" I - " . L__._ \!
1;=:"8-j"-='-"".-' -:-"J
'.r'T t3 jl
I'. '1 ~;;; -::::.=-=
I r~' ~
I ,--.-'
L----
.(;l
~
1':!.13
I i3
'e
~9
:3
:~
o
---':J
r
i
,
!.,
. .
i':i
I
I
,
.J
-. _oj
i
-: - ...--==-~
...
UllI"'S .1. .S -
<)z
L.
C
.
~
~
f
..
;:
rl--I -,
~~
r
~
!!
it
_.v
:!;
'e'
:::
Ii I,' i.
::
i! ! i
i' !'. i
:= I
!: i
i r
r I
,
:: :
;~
.
.... i
II
n
.
.
!
;,
I
J
i
I
...!
..:,",
()Zj
L.
..
~
;;
!
. .
v.
Z ~;
o
~ ...
L ;;
iH
.... I ~
~ e:i
~ 1:
!i
. .
. .
! i
i
.
,
, I
"j
. ;:i
.-- ~H1
;;',Ij'
~ I;)
0:::1
z nil
",.
ni!
c.
OACHMENT "0" 0
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PlANNING DEPARTMENT.
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE
CUP89-16
5
6-6-AQ
HEARING DATE
I...... I' I
I~ iii
..., 0
~
.
%
'" "~I
%
... ~
..
.. . "-I
..
'"
0:
... .
..
~ . M-I "
~
. .
M.I
M-2
L...J L-.J I
/I
M-2
...
.
C.-M
C... C'M CoM
.ffiB CoM C.M
0
C-..
. CoM M-' M-I
. .,
M-I CoM
C'M
-{-
M-I
~~ M-' CoM CoM M" M-'
.,.
Ie
CI C-' c.! c-,
6"0" 9 ...2 M-2 M-
N "-2
M'2
M-'
CoM
c-"
"0"
"0"
"0" ."0'.
"0" 0
..
... .0.
J ~. :z: M-I
!C
+~ CoM 0
c,'" 0: .0"
"..+0+( CoM ~ M.'
,+
C-M M-'