HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-Planning
CIR OF SAN BERNARD~ - REQU.Qr FOR COUNCIL AC~ON
Frank A. Schuma
From: Planning Director
Subject:
Declaration of Impaction - Levying
of Developer Fees for the
San Bernardino Unified School
District
Dept: Planning
Date: May 13, 1985
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
None
Recommended motion:
That the request to establish interim school facilities financing
ordinance be referred to the Legislative Review Committee.
WA~
Signature Frank A. Schuma
Contact person:
Frank A. Schuma
Phone:
383-5057
Supporting data attached:
Yes, Staff Report
Ward:
City-wide
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
LI
CIR OF SAN BERNARDlio - REQUaT FOR COUNCIL AC~ON
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Declaration of Impaction - Levying of Developer
Fees for the San Bernardino Unified School District
On April 16, 1985 the San Bernardino Unified School District
adopted a declaration of impaction for school facilities
located within the City of San Bernardino and surrounding
unincorporated properties and is requesting that the Mayor
and Council concur with the District's findings of impaction
and require the collection of a fee in the amount of $1,827
per single-family unit and a fee of $1,663 for each multiple
family unit.
The City of San Bernardino, in the past, has worked in
cooperation with the school districts in implementing the
school impaction fees in the following manner prior to
issuance of building permits. The developer must pay the
respective school district the amount determined for reso-
lution of school impaction. The school district then issues
a receipt to the developer which is submitted to the City at
the time building permits are issued. In no case has the
City ever collected any money from developers on behalf of a
school district.
,.0 00
San Bernardino City Unified School District
E, Neal Roberts, EdD., Superintendent
Harold L. Boring, EdD., Assistant Superintendent, Administrative UC:".D. - ADMIN. OFF.
1985 HAY -8 PM 3: 56
o
y-_....... H"
There's No Better Place To Learn
'l11e Honorable W. R. (Bob) HolClCllb, Mayor, and
~s of the San Bernardino City Camcil, and
City 1Idmini.strator
City of San Bernardino, CA 92418
SUB:JEX:T: Declaration of Impaction
May 7, 1985
'l11e Notification of Conditions of OIrercr<:M:ting of the San Bernardino City
Unified School District is suDnitted to you for your cq:proval.
Every effort has been made to validate the construction data with the San
Bernardino City Planning DepartDent.
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Declaration of Inpaction and Certification
of Minutes fran the Board Ireeting of April 16, 1985, with attacllllents.
Please notify this office when this item will be on your agenda.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
J ~'\ ~/ /: Ij~v~;j
~ L. IlORIOO, Pd. D.U
Assistant Superintendent'
1Idmini.strative Services
H!B:rh
Enclosures
e
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION (714) 1il llH
777 North F Street . San Bernardino. CA 92410 . (714)
o
SAN SERNONO CITY UNIFIED SCHO DISTRICT
CEFlTIFlCATION OF l'JINUTES
o
The Board met in regular session on the 15th dayof
meeting place thereof. The meeting was called to order at 5: 30 o'clock
P.pri 1
p. m.
, 19 85 . at the usual
Members present: H. UrOlm, M. Brown, Fa\~ke, Grossman, Neiqel, Obershal.~
Members absent: Di az
The adoption of the following resolution and order was moved by Member Fa,:/ke . . and
seconded by Member r,1. Brown . and a vote being taken, the said resolution and order was adopted
by the following votes of members present at that time.
AYES: Members H. Brown, M,. Brown, Fa\1ke, Srossman, Neigel, Obersha\.!
NOES: Members None
ABSTENTIONS: Members None
SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
DECLARATION OF IMPACT
WHEREAS, for some time past there has been a continuing and substantial.
increase in population within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified
School District, located in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County,
to the extent that the school facilities of this district have become over-
crowded; and
WHEREAS, that population growth has manifested itself in an increase in student
population of the schools of the San Bernardino City Unified School District;
and
WHEREAS, the student popul ation has exceeded the capacity of the school s I
normal housing ability; and ~
WHEREAS, in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions or
dedications of land from the developers of such new residential developments,
this district would not have financial resources adequate to provide proper
educational facilities for all the children residing in this district; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970; added to Statutes of 1977,
Chapter 955) Division 1, Title 7 to the Government Code, makes: provision for
financial or other assistance by developers to a school diStrict if the
governing board of the school district has made a finding that conditions of
overcrowding exist in one or more attendance areas of the district and if such
finding includes the additional information specified in Government Code
Sect ion 65971;
o
o
o
o
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that, pursuant to Government Code
Section 65971 an<! related oi'ciinanccs of jurisdiction in ~Ihich the District is
located, this Governing Uoal~ makes the following finding~:
1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in many of the schools in the San
Bernardino City Unified School District; the capacities and enroll-
ments by grade 1 eve 1 s are descri bed in Table 1, and the attendance
areas are depicted on the maps included as Table 6.
2, The facts underlying this Board's conclusion that conditions of
overcrOl~ding exist in the above-mentioned attendance areas include
the fo 11 owi ng:
a. For the purpose of this finding, this Board assumes that
scheduling and classroom allocation will be done in such a way
as to make the most efficient use of classrooms and related
facilities, which will be available over such period, consistent
with the district's standards for classroom loading, needs for
special use facilities and special education,
b, The maximum number of pupils. that could be enrolled in the
schools without a substantial reduction in the quality of the
program is indicated as the Functional Maximum Capacity in Table
1. For the purposes of. this finding, this Board.makes the same
assumption which it made for the purposes of the finding in
subparagraph a above.
3. All reasonable methods of mitigating the overcrowding have been
evaluated and subject to the conditions set forth in Table 4, and no
feasible method for reducing such conditions exist.
4. The finding set forth in Section 3 above is subject to[the condition
that, if a responsible developer enters into an agreement with the
district by executing an agreement and providing such security for
the performance of such agreement as the district may require, then
such agreement shall be deemed by thi s Governing Board to be a
feasible method of mitigating conditions of overcrowding caused by
the specific development to which such agreement relates for so long
as such agreement rema ins in effect.
. .
5. The construction of additional, permanent school facilities (in-
cluding, in addition to classrooms, facilities to house administra-
tive, recreational and other functions necessary and desirable to
support and supplement classroom operations) is the only long term
solution to conditions of overcrowding in the District's schools.
Financial or other support from developers supplied pursuant either
to agreements of the type mentioned in Section 4 above or to the
above mentioned provisions of the. Government Code and City of San
Bernardino and County of San Bernardino Ordinances can, at best,
provide only temporary and partial relief from conditions of over-
o
o
o
o
,
crowding caused by new residential development. Until additional,
permanent school facilities are constructed, conditions of over-
crowding will continue to exist, notwithstanding partial relief from
such developer support, and such conditions will worsen in time due
to the temporary nature of the relief provided by developer support.
6, The San Bernardino City Unified School District hereby requests the
City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino to concur
with the District's findings of impaction and require the collection
of fees from builders/developers.
7. Tables 1 through 6 are presented as a part of the findings of
impaction,
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Secretary of this Board deliver
certified copies of this resolution to the City of San Bernardino and the
County of San Bernardino.
I, E, NEAL ROBERTS. Secretary of the Governing Board of the San Bernardino
City Unified School District hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly msde,
adopted and entered In the Bosrd minutes of the Governing Board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District on
the 16th dsy of ,A,pri 1 ,19 85.
Dated:
April 17 , 1985
n.~.llli./-
~U-12 (R.... 10183)
Secretary, Board of Education
Adenda Item
4,1
.,0-.
o
o
o
.
.
\
I :
School Impaction and Implementation of land
Dedication or Developers' Fees
(Prepared by Administrative Services Division)
The housing boom" in numerous a~~s within the. School DistriCt boundaries has
caused the actual and projected enrollment to exceed the functional maximum
capacity in certain school attendance areas. The February 19, 1985 report to
.the Board of Education showed more than 14 schools were at, or had surpassed, .
their functional capacity. On March 19, 1985. a Student Generation Report '
indicated that .the average new house was producing .78 students and multi-
residences were providing an average of .71 students each.
It is in order at this time for'the Board of Education to: .
4.1
'.
6:30p;m.
1. determine whether or not overcrowding, which will impair the normal
functioning of educational programs, exists or will exist in one or
more attendance areas within the district, and
2. assess reasonable methods of mitigating the conditions of over-
crowding if overcrowding does or will exist.'
-3..
. .
," ,
.,
i',
:0
o
o
;0
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
After a series of reports by the District Administration, including studies
and surveys of housing developments, a notification of condition of over-
crowding is hereby proposed pursuant to Government Code Section 65971.
Following a Public Hearing on this matter, and if the Board of Education
concurs with the Administration's report, a declaration of school impaction
is in order. A Notification of Condition of Overcrowding will then be
submitted to the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino.
Impacted Schools
The recommendation to file this Notification of Condition of Overcrowding is
based on infonRation contained in Table 1. Maps of school boundaries are
shown as Table 6. .
TABLE 1
IMPACTED SCHOOLS
Overcrowding will exist due to the occupation of newly constructed dwelling
.units creating enrollment in excess of the capacity in many of the schools of
the District. .
Functional
Maximum
Schoo I Capaci~
Barton 399-432
Bradley 699-930
California 426-492
Del Rosa 789-888
Emnerton 606-672
*Kenda 11 336-369
Kimbark 276-342
*Lincoln 636-702
*Lytle Creek 516-582
*Monterey 639-738
*Mt. Vernon 516-582
Muscoy 576-642
NNllIrk 519-618
11/2/84
Enrollment
1985-86
Prel iminary
Projec!l~n
Student Preliminary
Growth Per Projections &
Housing Plans Housing Plans
***
301 316
736 738
426 487
869 851
589 607
277 309
281 288
706 811
550 563
629 695
544 602
552 601
465 475
177 493
14 752
59 546
232 1,083
305 912
950 1,259
1,001 1,289
18 829
6569
229 924
602
601
550 1,025
-4-
.c' 0 0
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
North Park 546-579 554 589
*Oehl 606-672 447 453
*R 11 ey 606-672 624 692
*Roosevelt 729-762 813 863
Thompson 576-609 543 572
*Urbita 273 278 314
Wann Springs 543-774 581 641
Shandin H11ls 964 872 959
Cajon 2,476 1,925 1,883
S8HS 2,331 2,201 2,373
SGHS 2,918 2,605 2,530
o
383
852
836
695
863
175 747
3
263
Plus housing plans at non-impacted schools
74 388
235 876
. 673 .1,632
713 2,596
52 2,427
375 2,905
850
*
School attendance area totally in City
** This capacity excludes. space set aside for libraries, cafetoriums/multiuse rooms,
spe~ial education.programs, bilingual education, ~sic, chapter 1 and 2 programs,
school improvement programs, and desegregation and inte~ration programs.
*** As of 4/4/85
Student Generation
In the opinion of the San. Bernardino City Unified School District and based
upon current data as presented in Table 2, each new dwelling unit produces a
student yield of .78 for single family.units and .71 for multi family unit.
TABLE 2
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
Elementary Intermediate High School
Student
Generation Factor
Single
Family Unit
0.47
0.13
0.18
0.78
-5-
o
o
o
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
Multi
Family Unit
0.51
0.11
0.09
0.71
Generation by School
Student generation worksheets of newly constructed and/or proposed housing
units identifying potential student enrollments are an Appendix to this
report. Table 3, Student Growth Per Housing Plans, summarizes the develop-
ments and proposed student enrollments per school attendance area. The
figures indicated are based upon housing information collected through March,
1985. The detailed analysis for each development is. found in the Appendix.
TABLE 3
STUDENT GROWTH PER HOUSING PLANS
Column 2 of this table gives the total number of known housing developments
.under construction, ready for occupancy or proposed. Column 4 shows the
Student Generation Yield based upon the type of dwelling.
School
Attendance
Area
Number of
Developments
Number of
Lots/Units
Type
SF=Single Family
MF=Mul ti-Family
Student
Generation
Yield
El ementary
Ba rton
2 348 MF 177
2 28 MF 14
1 115 MF 59
5 455 MF 232
5 598 MF 305
4 1,098 MF 560
6 830 SF 390
4 1,034 MF 527
13 1,004 SF 472
2 36 MF 18
2 11 MF 6
6 452 MF 6.
Bradley
California
Del Rosa
Emmerton
Kenda 11
Kenda 11.
Kimbark
Kimbark
L1 ncol n
Lytle Creek
Monterey
-6-
. 0
0 0 0
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
NeljQJark 4 726 MF 370
NeljQJark 4 383 SF 180
North Park 5 481 MF 245
North Park 1 41 SF 19
Oehl 1 750 MF 383
Riley 1 6 MF 3
Thompson 2 373 SF 175
Urbita 2 146 MF 74
Warm Springs 3 432 MF 220
Warm Springs 1 29 SF 14
Intermediate
Shandin Hills 18 3,454 MF 381
Shandin Hills 24 2,258 SF 292
High School
Cajon 17 3,339 MF 301
Cajon 24 2,258 SF 404
SBHS 12 577 MF 52
SGHS 29 3,385 MF 301
SGHS 3 402 SF 72
TOTAL 6,252
. .
Within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified School District, there
are approximately 944 single family units, 1,003 multi-family units ready for
occupancy and approx1mately.2,938 units in various stages of construct1on. In
addition, there are 5,076 un1ts wh1ch have rece1ved tentat1ve map approvals
from the C1tyand County of San Bernard1no.
-7-
.
o
o
o
o
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
Mitigation
In attempting to alleviate the problem created by student growth, the District
has considered reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding as
indicated in Table 4.
TABLE 4
Overcrowding Mitigations
A statement of .a possible mitigating condition is presented followed
by a response in our attempt to meet that condition.
1. Agreements between a developer and the affected school district whereby
temporary buildings will be leased to the District for an interim period,
or whereby temporary buildings owned by the School District will be used.
Response: No agreements currently exist between developers and the
District for buildings to be leased to the District and the
District does not have temporary buildings that are not currently
in use.
2. Availability of funds, the use of which would not impair the normal
functioning of educational programs.
Response: There are no District funds available which would not impair the
normal functioning of educational programs.
3. Use of funds which could be made available from the sale of surplus
property.
Response: The District does not have surplus real property to sell. The
sale of surplus personal property generates income that is
earmarked for replacement of obsolete equipment.
4. Use of School District Property for temporary buildings.
Response: The District has property that can be used for placement of
temporary buildings but has no funds to lease additional
temporary classrooms.
5. Use of other schools in the District where overcrowding does not exist.
Response: Attendance boundary changes have been accomplished. School
capacities have been studied and increased to a maximum
capacity designated as the functional maximum. .A closed
intermediate school has'been reopened at great expense as an
elementary school site. Two sites are currently under lease to
the County Schools Office for special programs. These students
~-
.
o
o
o
o
Board of Education Meeting
Apri 1 16, 1985
would otherwise be served by the District. The District also has
a closed high school site. Extensive restoration and repair must
take place prior to reopening this site. It is estimated that
this project would involve a two year process and cost
$2,500,000.00.
6. Double or staggered sessions.
SB 813 has mandated a longer instructional day per year for the
current and next two years. Double or staggered sessions would
require a reduction in the amount of time the student spends in
class. Teachers would be unable to prepare special instructional
materials before class because of the daily move. These circum-
stances would cause the educational level provided students to be
greatly reduced. Additionally, a reduction of instructional time
now would result in loss of funds. Students would be on the
streets during predawn and afterdark hours in order to attend
double or staggered sessions. Funds are not available to provide
additional transportation.
Double or staggered sessions would additionally overload existing
facilities, i.e. cafeteria, restrooms and workrooms.
7. Continuous school programs as authorized by Education Code Sections 37600
et. seq.
Response:
The San Bernardino City Unified School District currently
operates two continuous (year round) school programs at the
elementary level. In order to mandate additional year round
schools, the District must comply with all legal requirements
which could delay the availability of classrooms under the
process for up to two years. In the meantime, students would not
be housed. Additional costs would be incurred for food service,
transportation, utilities, administrative staff and other support
staff such as school nurses, counseling staff, attendance office
personnel, library staff, speech therapists, school
psychologists, clerks and custodians.
8. Use of available bond revenues to the extent authorized by law.
Response:
Response: There are no new bond revenues available at this time.
Proposition 13 has removed bonding ability from school districts.
9. Use of facilities in other districts.
Response: Facilities are not available in the districts bordering the San
Bernardino City Unified School District.
10. Use of interdistrict attendance agreements.
-9-
.
o
o
o
o
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
Res~onse: The San Bernardino City Unified School District had
interdistrict agreements affecting 92 students coming into and
149 students going out of the District during the 1983-84 school
year. We anticipate a similar number for the current year;
however, these a9reements are generally for specific reasons and
would not be practical for most students.
11. Filing of appropriate notices of overcrowding with the appropriate agencies
within the attendance areas subject to overcrowding.
Response: Upon Board adoption of a Resolution to Declare a Condition of
Overcrowding, Notices will be filed with the City and County of
San Bernardino.
Classroom Cost
In considering reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding, the
District concludes that there is no feasible method for reducing the conditions
of overcrowding except additional temporary classrooms. Table 5 shows the basic
installation cost of portable classrooms.
TABLE 5
Estimated Cost to Install Temporary Classrooms
1. Modular Classrooms. Telephone Quotations March, 1985
Annual Rent - 1st Year
Annual Rent.. 2nd Year
Annual Rent - 3rd Year
Delivery/Setup
Annual Rent - 4th Year
(plus est. CPI 4.5%)
Annual Rent. 5th Year
(plus est. CPI 4.5%)
Removal Charge
Misc. . Skirt, Ramp, Earthquake
TOTAL
Insco
(24 x 40t
$7,200.00
7,200.00
7,200.00
1,400.00
7,524.00
7,863.00
800.00
2,300.00
$41,487.00
2. Restroom Facilities
Annual Rent. 1st Year
Annual Rent - 2nd Year
Annual Rent - 3rd Year
Steelgard
(12 x 48) est. only
$12,285.00
12,285.00
12,285.00
-10-
.
o
o
o
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
Delivery/Setup
Annual Rent - 4th Year
Annual Rent - 5th Year
Removal Charge
Misc. - Skirt/Ramp
TOTAL
o
-0-
12,838.00
13,415.00
-0-
-0-
$63, 108 .00
3. Classrooms: Utilities, Site Preparation
a. Electrical: For electrical, Fire
Alarm, Intercom - $25.00
per linear foot (minimum
150 ft.) plus $125.00 for
Breaker and Enclosure $ 3,875.00
b. Site Preparation:
(1) Paving and Walkway
(2) Leveling and Grading
(3) Sprinkler Repair/removing and
replacing fence
Minimum Expense/Classroom
4. Restroom: Utilities, site development
(one per nine classrooms)
Water, sewer, plumbing
Electrical
Architect Fees
State Fee/Plan Check
Inspection Fee
TOTAL
Classroom Cost Summary
Temporary Classroom
1/9 Temporary Restroom
Utilities/Site Preparation
Classroom
1/9 Utilities/Site Prepara-
tion Restroom
Architect Fees
State Fees
Inspection Fees
Furniture/Carpeting
Subtotal
-11-
2,500.00
6,375.00
5,500.00
1,000.00
2,300.00
480.00
800.00
$10,080.00
$ 41,487.00
7,012.00
6,375.00
1,120.00
2,300.00
480.00
800.00
7,350.00
$ 66,924.00
o
o
o
o
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
Inflationary Fa~tor 5.0%
TOTAL
3,346.00
$ 70,270.00
Using the formula established by County Ordinance No. 2409, Section 61.065 of
L X C = fee per dwelling unit;
~
where L equals the number of students generated by each dwelling unit, C equals
the cost of leasing one temporary classroom (including utilities, furnishings,
and restroom facilities not constructed with permanent foundations) for a
period of five years, and S equals the number of students per classroom, which
shall be thirty, unless information provided by the school district indicates
otherwise.
Single family units
.78 X 703270 = $1,827
o
.71 X 703~70 = $1,663
Multi-family units
Public Hearing
It is in order at this time to call upon the public for comments about the
conditions of overcrowding, The Declaration of Impaction and the collection of
fees from housing builders and developers, as reported above.
Resolution
Following the Public Hearing, if the Board of Education concurs with the
report, then a Declaration of School Impaction is in order by adoption of the
following resolution:
-12-
o
o
o
o
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
DECLARATION OF IMPACT
WHEREAS, for some time past there has been a continuing and substantial
increase in population within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified
School District, located in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County,
to the extent that the school facilities of this district have become over-
crowded; and
WHEREAS, that population growth has manifested itself in an increase in student
population of the schools of the San Bernardino City Unified School District;
and
WHEREAS, the student population has exceeded the capacity of the schools'
normal housing ability; and .
WHEREAS, in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions or
dedications of land from the developers of such new residential developments,
this district would not have financial resources adequate to provide proper
educational facilities for all the children residing in this district; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970; added to Statutes of 1977,
Chapter 955) Division 1, Title 7 to the Government Code, makes provision for
financial or other assistance by developers to a school district if the
governing board of the school district has made a,finding that conditions of
overcrowding exist in one or more attendance areas of the district and if such
finding includes the additional information specified in Government Code
Section 65971;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND DETERMINED that, pursuant to Government Code
Section 65971 and related ordinances of jurisdiction in which the District is
located, this Governing Board makes the following findings:
1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in many of the schools in the San
Bernardino City Unified School District; the capacities and enroll-
ments by grade levels are described in Table 1, and the attendance
areas are depicted on the maps included as Table 6.
2. The facts underlying this Board's conclusion that conditions of
overcrowding exist in the above-mentioned attendance areas include
the following:
a. For the purpose of this finding, this Board assumes that
scheduling and classroom allocation will be done in such a way
as to make the most.efficient use of classrooms and related
facilities, which will be available over such period, consistent
with the district's standards for classroom loading, needs for
special use facilities and special education,
-13-
o
o
o
o
Board of Education Meeting
April 16, 1985
b. The maximum number of pupils that could be enrolled in the
schools without a substantial reduction in the quality of the
program is indicated as the Functional Maximum Capacity in Table
1. For the purposes of this finding, this Board makes the same
assumption which it made for the purposes of the finding in
subparagraph a above.
3. All reasonable methods of mitigating the overcrowding have been
evaluated and subject to the conditions set forth in Table 4, and no
feasible method for reducing such conditions exist.
4. The finding set forth in Section 3 above is subject to the condition
that, if a responsible developer enters into an agreement with the
district by executing an agreement and providing such security for
the performance of such agreement as the district may require, then
such agreement shall be deemed by this Governing Board to be a
feasible method of mitigating conditions of overcrowding caused by
the specific development to which such agreement relates for so long
as such agreement remains in effect.
5. The construction of additional, permanent school facilities (in-
cluding, in addition to classrooms, facilities to house administra-
tive, recreational and other functions necessary and desirable to
support and supplement classroom operations) is the only long term
solution to conditions of overcrowding in the District's schools.
Financial or other support from developers supplied pursuant either
to agreements of the type mentioned in Section 4 above or to the
above mentioned provisions of the Government Code and City of San
Bernardino and County of San Bernardino Ordinances can, at best,
provide only temporary and partial relief from conditions of over-
crowding caused by new residential development. Until additional,
permanent school facilities are constructed, conditions of over-
crowding will continue to exist, notwithstanding. partial relief from
such developer support, and such conditions will worsen in time due
to the temporary nature of the relief provided by develoPer support.
6. The San Bernardino City Unified School District hereby requests the
City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino to concur
with.the District's findings of impaction and require the collection
of fees from builders/developers.
7. Tables 1 through 6 are presented as a part of the findings of
impaction.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Secretary of this Board deliver
certified copies of this resolution to the City of San Bernardino and the
County of San Bernardino.
-"-
o
o
o
o
APPENDIX
STUDENT GENERATION WORKSHEETS
SCHOOL IMPACTION AND IMPLEMENTATION
OF LAND DEDICATION OR DEVELOPER'S FEE
Administrative Services
April 16, 1985
Report to the Board of Education
April 16, 1985
o
SAN BERNARnINOQ-Y lTNl"IF,n SCHOrOI<:T~JCT
STrDE~T r,E~EP.ATION ~ACTOR
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA:
(1) Barton
TRACT/C.U.P.
83-28
Pumalo/Arden
Serrano Int.
83-28
Pumalo/Arden
(I) San GorRonio
83-28
Pumalo/Arden
.*SF - Single Family
~rr. 1',,1 ti Fa!D11v
LOTS/UNITS
20
328
IT\ _ T_ft.~paA ~~~nn'
Student enrollments proiected from the
following generation factors:
~*
51'
M1'
E
0.47
0.51
TYPE
MF
MF
I
0.13
0.11
S
0.18
0.09
Total
. 0.78
0.71
Page 1 0
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
10
167
E
I
2
36
.
S
2
30
o
SAN BERNARnINO()rv lTNIFIEn SCHOOI~~IcT
STUDENT r.ENEFATION l'ACTOR
Page 2 0
~CHOOL ATTENDANCE AREA:
(1) Bradley
TRACT/C.U.P.
83-105
84-22
Curtis Int.
19-105
84-22
(I) San GorRonio
83-105
84-22
LOTS/UNITS
Student enrollments pro~ected from the
following generation factors:
~* E I S Total
S~ 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
E I S
TYPE
.*SF - Single Family
MF - nulti Family
7
14
MF
14
7
M1'
2
2
1
1
o
SAN BERNARnIN
TY UNUn:n :;CHll
J J.:-'11< J.l~ J.
Page J 0
STUDENT r.ENERATION l'ACTOR
TRACT/C.U.P.
LOTS/UNITS
Student enrollments pro~ected from the
following generation factors:
Tvpe* E I S Total
-
SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
MF 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
E I S
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA:
(1) California
TYPE
California/19th
115
MF
59
(I)Shandin Hills
California/19th
13
(I)Cajon HS
California/19th 10
.0. SF _ Single Family
MF - 1',,1 t1 Fmil,.
(T _ TmnA~~.A ~~~nnl
o
SAN BERNARnINO
STUDENT r.ENEllATtON l>ACTOR
.!.:"'1~ J..l.J.
SCHOOL ATTE~'IlANCE A~EA:
(1) Del Rosa
TRACT/C.U.P.
83-119
83-84
83-92
83-67
83-32
Golden Valley
83-119
83-84
83-92
83-67
83-32
(1) San Bernardino HS
83-119
83-84
83-92
83-67
83- 32
.*SF - Single F811111y
MF - ~'nlti F_11y
UN lk'lt:Jl ~t:t!(I(
rage "0
LOTS /UNITS
64
328
14
24
25
Student enrollments pro~ected from the
following generation factors:
~* E I S Total
SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
MY 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
TYPE E I S
!ofF 33
MF 167
MF 7
!ofF 12
MF 13
7
36
2
3
3
6
30
1
2
2
c
lTNP'tF,n SCHOO
SAN BERNARnINO
sTtmENT r.E~F.RATION ~ACTOR
SCHOOL ATTE~~ANCF. A~EA:
(Ii Emmerton
TRACT/C.U.P.
Base Line/
Sterling/
McKinley
West of School
83-30
Arden south of
Highland across
from school
84-21
Curtis Int
Base Line/
Sterling/
McKinley
West of School
83-30
Arden south of
Highland across
from school
84-21
,"SF _ Single Family
}IF - !'1I1 ti Family
!~T"l: ll~T
rage J 0
Student enrollments proiected from the
following Reneration factors:
~* E I S Total
Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
LOTS /UNITS
168
TYPE
MF
30
MF
192
MF
100
MF
108
MF
E
I
S
86
15
98
51
55
18
.
o
SAN BERNARnINO ~ lTNUIEn RcHOOI~~ICT
RTllDENT r.ESEFATION l'ACTOR
Page 60
SCHOOL ATTENnANCF. A~EA:
Student enrollments pro1ected from the
following generation factors:
T\"'Oe* E I S Total
-
Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION ltELD
(I) Emmerton
TRACT/C.U.P.
LOTS/UNITS
TYPE
E
I
S
(1) San Gor2on1o H.S.
Base Line/ 168 ' MF 15
Sterling/
McKinley
West of School 30 MF 3
83-30 192 MF 17
Arden south of 100 /. MF 9
Highland across
fran school
84-21 198 MF 10
*SF - Single Family
~!F - 11\11 ti Family
o
SAN BERNARDINOOn' lTNIFIETl SCHOOISTIUl;1'
STUDENT GENEIlATtON l'ACTOR
.l.CI.~C '0
(I) Shandin Hills Int
12824 57
11396 28
10644 19
12130 14
10649 6
11921 8
12051 32
(I) Ca10n H.S.
12824 46
11396 23
10644 26
12130 20
10649 8
11921 7
12051 44'
,..." - "'____....._...1
o
SAN BERNARnINo()TY 1TNF1EJ1 SCHOOI1STIl!l;,[
STUDENT r.ENEllAT10N ~ACTOR
Page to
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA:
Student enrollments proiected from the
following generation factors:
~* E I S "'ota1
Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
MF 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
(1) Kendall
TRACT/C.U.P.
12896
LOTS/UNITS
254
TYPE
MF
E
I
S
130
Washington &
Pine
161
SF
75
12872
121
SF
57
(I) Shandin Hills Int.
12896
28
.
Washington &
Pine
21
12872
16
(I) Cajon H.S.
12896
23
Washington &
Pine
.
29
12872
22
*SF - Sing1a Family
MF" 1',,1 ti 1'8IIIily
IT\ _ T____._~ ~_L__.
-L
o
SAN B~;RNAKl)lN
TY UN!"l!".1I :"ll.~\J IJJ.:"J PI, J.\.J
rage 0
STUDE~T r,ENERATtON "'ACTOR
Student enrollments oroiected from the
following generation factors:
SCHOOL ATTENn~~CF. AREA: Tvpe* E I S Total
-
Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
(I) Kimbark M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE E I S
10182 60 SF 28
10183 33 SF 16
10184-85 45 SF 21
12629 48 SF 23
12150-51 318 MF 162
11842/11845 147 SF 69
10455-56 191 Sl' 90
11038 23 SF 11
11842 27 SF 13
10600 34 SF 16
11291-96 222 SF 104
11977-81 168 MF 86
10439-40 28 SF 13
10457-58 97 SF 46
10983 49 SF 23
12146 248 MF 127
84-30 300 >W 153
.i'SF _ Single Family
liF - ",,1 t1 Fail)'
o
,*SF - Single Family
}IF - 1',,1 ti Family
SAN BERNARnINO 'l llNFU:" :'''t!\J1 ,~!~!",.
STUDENT r.ENEFATION ~ACTOR
rage .LO
o
SAN BERNAllnINOOrr lTNP'lE" SCt!()(O!.~.J' l~J.
STlmENT r.E~ERATION vACTOR
Page 10
Student enrollments pro;ected from the
following generation factors:
SCHOOL ATTENnANCE A~EA: ~* E I S Total
Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
(0 Kimbark ~f1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE E I S
(I) Caion H.S.
10182 60 SF 11
10183 33 SF 6
10184-85 45 SF 8
12629 48 SF 9
12150-51 318 MF 29
11842/11845 147 SF 26
10455-56 191 SF 34
11038 23 SF 4
11842 27 SF 5
10600 34 SF 6
11291-96 222 SF 40
11977-81 168 MF 15'
10439""40 28 SF 5
10457-58 97 SF 17
10983 49 SF 9
12146 248 MF 22
84- 30 300 MF . 27
*SF - Single Family
~IF '" 11111 ti Family
.
c
SAN ISt.KNAKlllN
"11 UN t.. .Lr.JI. i'>>l.nu
IJ.!........."\J.\,.I,.
l'age
o
STlmENT r.E~1F.FAT10N l'ACTOR
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA:
Student enrollments pro~ected from the
following generation factors:
!!E.!:,* E I S Total
Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
HI' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
(n Lincoln
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
TRACT/C.U.P.
LOTS/UNITS
TYPE
E
I
S
83-40
24
MF
12
84-106
12
MF
6
Arrowview Int.
83-40
1
84-106
1
(I) San Bernardino
83-40
2
84-106
1
.*SF - Single Fam~ly
HF - 1'"1ti l'am1:v
IT' _ T____~_~ ~_~__.
.
o
SAN BERNARnINOTY IlN1"U:n SCH(OIl!~T~ H;)
SnIDENT r.ENEIlATION ~ACTOR
Page 0
Student enrollments oroiected from the
following generation factors:
~* E I S Total
Sl' 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
M1' 0.51 o.li 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AREA:
(I) Lytle Creek
TRACT/C.U.P.
LOTS/UNITS
I
S
TYPE
E
84-62
84-85
Curtis Int.
84-62
84-85
(1) San Gorgonio B.S.
84-62
84-85
.*SF - Sir'lle Family
MF - 1',,".:i Family
6
MF
3
5
3
MF
1
1
o
SAN BERNARnINO Or lTNIFIEn ScHOOOSTlllCT
STUDENT r.ENEIlATION l'ACTOR
. ~..- - 0
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AREA:
(I) Montere.y
TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS
83-71 28
83"-49 12
83-122 12
83-13 48
84- 72 48
84-99 304
Curtis Int.
83-71
83-49
83-122
83-13
84-72
84-99
(I) San r.oro:onio as
83- 71
83-49
83-122
83-13
84-72
84-99
,*SF - Single Family
HF - 1',,1 ti Family'
Student enrollments ~rojected from the
following generation factors:
~* E I ! Total.
. SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
MF 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
TYPE E I S
"l1' 14
MF 6
MF 6
MF 24
MF 24
MF 155
3
1
1
5
5
33
3
1
1
4
"
27
o
SAN BERNARIlINOC)ry lTNIFIEIl SCHO(Oll~T~ 1~.1
STUDENT ~ENEJlATtON l'ACTOR
l'aSiB 0
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA:
( 1) Newmark
,
TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS
12955 95
129,56 119
12958 118
12957 51
84-78 580
83-47 8
84-57 114
84-76 24 .
(I) Shandin Hills Int.
12955
12956
12958
12957
84-78
84-47
84-57
84- 76
( I) Cafon H.S.
12955
12956
12958
12957
84-78
84-47
84-57
84-76
.SF _ Single Family
MFa J~\1lt1 Family
'T - ~---_...._...1 ,,"_L _ _.
Student enrollments proiected from the
following generation factors:
~* E I S Total
SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
M1' 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
TYPE E I S
SF 45
SF 56
SF 55
SF 24
MF 296
MP 4
MF 58
MF 12
,
12
15
15
7
64
1
13,
3
17
21
21
9
52
10
2
o
SAN BERNARnINOTY lTNI~IF.TJ ScHcOlJ!ST~l(;T
~T1TDENT r.E~~ATION l'ACTOR
SCHOOL ATTr.\~ANCE AREA:
(ll North Park
TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS
12481 41
12411 122
11407 204
11921 75
11026 44
84-91 36
(1) Shandin Hills
.12481
12411
11407
11921
11026
84-91
(I) Caion HS
12481
12411
11407
11921
11026
84-91
,*SF - Single Family
HF - 1"111t1 1'aml1~'
Student enrollments proiected from the
following generation factors:
~*
Sl'
M1'
E
0.47
0.51
TYPE
I S
- -
0.13 0.18
0.11 0.09
Total
0.7/l
0.71
Page 0
STUDE~'T GENERATION YIELD
E 1 S
(1) - ImDacted
J,
SF
M1'
MF
}IF
~"'
MF
lq
62
104
38
22
18
5
13
22,
8'
5
4
7
11
18
7
4
1
o
SAN BERNARnINO Ov lTNl~IF.Jl SCH()(Ol~T~ !l;'J'
STUDENT r.ENEFATION l'ACTOR
Student enrollments projected from the
following generation factors:
SCilOOL ATTENDANCE AREA:
~*
0) Oeh1
TRACT/C.U.P.
Sl'
M1'
LOTS/UNITS
E I
0.47 0.13
0.51 0.11
TYPE
S
0.18
0.09
Total
0,78
0.71
Page 10
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
E I S
11922
SerrElno Int.
11922
(I)
San GorRonio
11922
-*SF - Single Family
MF - ~"lti Family
750
(I) - Impacted Scho 1
m'
383
83
67
o
SAN Jlt:KNAKII1N
'l'Y UN1....!!';.. :;\,.;tHJ 1I1.:"I.1'<.L"'1
o
- .-g-
STUDENT GENEJlATtON l'ACTOR
{l) Riley
Student enrollments projected from the
following generation factors:
Tvpe* E I S Total
-
SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
XV 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
SCHOOL ATTE!mANCE AREA:
TRACT/C.U.P.
LOTS/UNITS
TYPE
E
1
S
83-91
6
"fl'
3
Arrowview Int.
83-91
1
.
(I) San Bernardino HS
83-91
o
,*SF. Single FlIIIIily
MF - J1111ti Family
,
o
SAN BERNARnlNO lJN~. U"" ""nu"
STUDENT GENEllATION 'FACTOR
...,.a.......v...
Page 0
TRACT/C.U.P.
LOTS/UNITS
Student enrollments proiected from the
following generation factors:
I!E!,* E I S Total
.SF 0.470.130.18 0.78
~ 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
E I S
TYPE
CHOOL ATTENIlANCE AREA:
(I) Thompson
10358
185
SF
87
12735
188
SF
88
Serrano Int.
10358
24
12735
24
(1) San GorRonio HS
10358
33
12735
34
,*SF _ Single Family
MF. !'u1 ti Family
c
SAN BERNARnINO<:)ty lJNIFIEP ScHO~lST~lCT
STUDENT GENEIlATtON l'ACTOR
Page 0
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA:
(1) Urbita
TRACT/C.U.P.
85-9
12915
Curtis Int
85-9
12915
( 1) San Gorgonio
85-9
12915
.SF - Single Family
~lF" 1~111 t1 Familr
Student enrollments pro1ected from the
following generation factors:
Tvoe* E I S Total
-
SF 0.47 0.13 0.18 0.78
KF 0.51 0.11 0.09 0.71
STUDENT GENERATION YIELD
TYPE E I S
MF 60
MF 14
LOTS/UNITS
118
28
, , _ .____~_~ ft_~__.
13
3
11
2
, ,
,
o
SAN BERNARnINU n UNp.U:lI ~l;l!\Jl
STUDENT r,ENEJlATION l'ACTOR
t~l'( l\~J.
Student enrollments oroiected from the
following generation factors:
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE A~EA:
Tvpe*
-
E
0.47
0.51
(I) Warm Springs
Sl'
M1'
TRACT/C.U.P. LOTS/UNITS TYPE
12468 104 ~
84-69 168 ~fF
12813 29 SF
84-38 160 '{F'
Curtis Int.
12468
84-69
12813
84- 38
(1) San GorRonio
12468
84-69
12813
84-38
*SF .
Single Family
~',,1 ti Family
_ y______~ ~_L__.
NF lZ
IT'
I
0.13
0.11
S
0.18
0.09
Total
0.78
0.71
rage 0
E
STUl'E!\'T GENERATION YIELD
S
53
1\6
14
82
1
11
18
4
18
9
15
5.
14