The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-Planning , CIlC) OF SAN BERNARDIO>> - REQUEQ- FOR COUNCIL AC(hN Frank A. Schuma From: P1 anni ng Di rector Dept: Planning Date: December, 17, 1984 Subject: Appeal of Tentative Tract 10182 Mayor and Council Meeting of January 7, 1985, 9:00 a.m. Synopsis of Previous Council action: Previous Planning Commission Action: At the meeting of the Planning Commission on December 4, 1984, the following action was taken: The application for Tentative Tract No. 10182 was unanimously approved based on findings of fact contained in the staff report dated December 4, 1984 and subject to the conditions and standard requirements listed therein. The Negative Declaration for environmental review was also approved. Recommended motion: That the hearing on the appeal be closed and the decision of the Planning Commission be affiremed, modified or rejected. Q"'..IL~ Signature Frank A. Schuma Supporting data attached: Yes, Staff Report Ward: 383-5057 5 Contact person: Frank A. Schuma Phone: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Source: Finance: Council Notes: 75-0262 Agenda Item No ."."" - ~ , . . o o o o December 13, 1984 Frank Schuma Planning Director City of San Bernardino 300 No. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Attn: Ron Running Dear Mr. Schuma: It has come to my attention that Tentative Tract No. 10182 is also involved with Tentative Tract Nos. 12150 and 12151. It is my intention to appeal the Planning Commission's approval of this tract as well. The reasons for my appeal are the same as those listed in my letter also dated December 13, 1984. Thank you for your assistance. Yours truly, '--~ ~~berts 3766 Belmont Ave. San Bernardino, CA 92407 00 Ir~ (i~ ;"r.: II , ',' l" " ~ \:; :.: \,.. \:P L.:~ r f~1 '1' , t:~1 DE.e 1.:~ 1884 _ .....,,_. '. ....-..... ..... -.fl.~~ll-\ CITY 1'1",:,,,,:",, ',.:,:C,' '1...1. St,~i C cf.~'; 1 !~~': <-.~L', r:J . o o o " ,0 ([)l P- frJ ' fjij ~ ~ fE 0 ~7 @ [ff] 0[[:'131984 CITY PLANNING ""D ~AN EjERNAR"D~: ARTMENT, "va., CA. December I), 1984 ?rank Schuma Planning Director City of San Bernardino )00 No. "n" Street San Berna~dino, Ca. 92418 Attn. Ron Running Dear I.ir. SchumR S I protest approval of the following project: Tentative Tract Nos. 12150 and 12151 and Tentative Tract No. 10182. ~ Owner: Associated Engineers 165 W. Hospitality Lane, #15 San Bernardino, Ca 92408 Shadow Hills, Ltd, 245 Fischer, Suite B4 Costa Mesa, Ca 92626 Applicant: Subject propert~' is an irregularly-:::haped parcel of land consisting of approximately 2).2 acres located at the northwest corner of" Kendall Drive and Pine Avenue and having a, "rontage of approximately 1,876 feet on the north side of K0ndall Drive and having a frontage of 61) feet on the west side of Pine Avenue and being located adjacent to the east sid! of 8sble Creek Channel. It has come to my atten:ion that incl'ded in thicl lJr:)posal is the follow- ings (from San B2rnard.i.no Pl8.nning Dp.IJ:lrtment Summary) ".. the existing hill:'lide extending '~~,:)ilg the norther'ly boundal'y of the ni:e, located west of the rr,etropolitan '!later District rlght-of-,';ay will be regraded and lowered in height between fi'!e and thirty feet in order to provide addi- tional building pad area." The project site is not being "regraded", it is being nearly demoliahed! The grading standards include.j in the 'ferdemont fJtudy sta':e that in the developmen', or the area, cuts and fill~hould be minir.:ized to prevent ~:ea.rTirlg o~ the hills ides. A ma:dmUl1 cut and fill of 15 fee t in runs of 200 feet with pro\risions for' slope Rnd soil stability will be per- mitted. Proposed cuts or fills tha~ exceed this will require a specific review and approval of eta grading pl8.n by the City Planning Director Oi' the Ci ty Engineer. Natural dr'iinage .Jourse'" nho:J.ld be re3pected and proposed e!1ange3 should insure that erocli()i1 Get tling and down-course :Jrain,,-ge problems will be minimized. To insurf' Lhis, a drainage analysis shall be prcpa~ed for developments involving more than four dwelling units and lor. pB.r(~cls. . '0 o o o ':'he model,); this project demonstrates that not onlJ are the hills being lowered, bu t also the natural ou tcroPl)ings rer:oved to ace orrloclate building pads. }'urther, a portion of the project i,' in a :nood zone. Shouldril'l be placed where water once drained, whi'~'~ does the ',.,ater drain excep': to another area. In accommodatIng the qJplicant, we run the risk of ha~ing established existing homes. The Planning Depart- ment is aware of the concerns 0:' the residents of'.h," area, espe'~ially thos,," who have lived in the ar-ea for 10 years or ~l:O"i' and who have had experience with the effect of land alteration as r(;lL,tes to flooding. The Gomprehe:lsi'le Storm Drain is repeatedly mentioned in the Ve:.'demont Study; h.)'oVever, it is not yet in place. As develop:;:2nt has occurred in the area affecting natural drainage courses, prob'1.ems with erosion ha':e been on the increase. I am sure the City Strec': Department could substantiate that claim. As for the aesthetics of this project, I refer to Section 4 of the Draft Environmental IMpact Report of the Verdemont J\rea Plan, specific- ally: 4.:3.6 "Visual & Natural Features": ". . . . natural features vlill be preserved through development standards and land use controls. Those IVould include the Kendall Drive Foothills, th", Meyers Road Bluff area and o-;;her creek valleys and ridges." I am reasonably certain that if those homeowners ~ho were notified of this proposal were aware of the land alterati,on 2nvolved, you would be hearing additional protests. AIRO,:r. am QUI'2E c:"rtaln you woul.i 'respond to those concerns with the same unbiasedt objective considera- tionyou have given other concerns we have brGught '~J you. In conclusion, this project is not consistent with the goals as set forth in the standards for the llerdemont Area Plan which include I To improve and enhance the visual image of the Verd~mont area by re- inforcing existing assets; to develop an urban form over time which preserves a balanced mixture of land uses and open spaces; to utilize architecture, landscape, and open space to help rein:orce the identity and image of the area and to create a visually plca:oi.ng and .functional built environment; to protect and improve the saenil) quality of the Verdemont area; to maintain, protect, and preserve t'le natural envir-on- ment as a major element in the development of t:'1e c.~'C>i'l; to pra::;erve as much as possible the existing land form found in the area. Please ad',ise if a more formal appeal is required or if initiating a petition IVould be helpful. Your guidance will be '"cry much apprecia- ted. ~1:~ narbara J. Rober:s 3766 Belmont Ave. , San Bernardino, ~a 92407 o o o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 3OONORTH"O"STREET.SANBERNAROINO.CALlFORNIA 92418 W.R. "BOB" HOLCOMB Mayor Members of the Common Council Robert A. Cutlineda . .. .. . . . . . . First Ward Jack Reilly..... .. . . . . . . . . . . Second Ward Rllph Hernandez . . . . . .. . . .. . . Third Ward Stew. Marks ....... ...... . ~ Fourth Ward Gordon Quia....... .. ......... FlfthW.rd OanFrlZle'.................. .SlxthW.,d Jack Strickler .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. . .seventh Ward December 7, 1984 Dominion-Sunflower Properties 4740 Von Karman Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Sir or Madame: At the meeting of the Planning Commission on December 4, 1984, the following , action was taken: The applications for Tentative Tract No. 10182 and Lot Line Adjustment No., 84-11, to establish a 60 unit single-family subdivi,sion in the R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential zone and to adjust the lot lines between two parcels to conform with tract boundaries on property consisting of approx- imately 14.8 acres having a frontage of approximately 200 feet on the east side of Olive Avenue and being located approximately 488 feet south of the centerline of Irvington Avenue, were approved based on findings of fact contained in the staff report dated December 4, 1984 and subject to the con- ditionsand standard requirements listed therein, with the following addi- tion: Conditions: 9. Garages on Lots 11 and 30 of Tentative Tract No. 10182 shall be located nearest the lot line opposite the rear lot line which forms the key lot. According to the San 8ernardino Municipal Code, Chapter 18.20.130., the following applies to the filing of a tentative tract map: (This provision would also apply to a lot line adjustment.) "The decision of the Commission shall be final unless appealed to the Mayor and Common Council, in writing. The written appeal shall be submitted to the office of the City Clerk within ten days from the date of the meeting." If no appeal is filed pursuant to the above provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, the action of the Commission shall be final. R~speCtfUl1Y, 1"1 II ~~/J '-1.i:,~ FRANK r.sz.;;AA Planning Director mf cc: Building and Safety Dept. Engineering Division cc: Shadow Meadows 4740 Von Karman N~~port Beach, CA 92660 -- ...' ITY OF SAN BERN~DINO PL~NING DEPARTMEN SUMi\~ARY AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD 14 12-04-84 5 UJ fI) <t o Tentative Tract No. 10182 , Amended #1 & Lot Line Adjustment No. 84-11 APPLICANT: Domlnion-Sunflower Properties 4740 Von Karman Newport 8each, CA 92660 OWNER: Shadow Meadows 4740 Von Karman Newport Beach, CA 92660 t; LLI :::l o W 0: " <t UJ a:: <t Subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 14.8 acres having a frontage of approximately 200 feet on the east side of Olive Avenue and being located approximately 488 feet south of the centerline of Irvington Avenue. The proposal is to estab- lish a 60 unit single family subdivision in the R-I-7200, Single-Family Residential Zone and to adjust the lot lines between two parcels to conform with tract boundaries. PROPERTY Subject North South East West EXISTING LAND USE Vacant Vacant S.B.C.F.C.D. Channel Sing.-Fam. Dwellings Vacant GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Resid. 4-7 du/ac Resid. 4-7 du/ac Open Space Resid. 4-7 du/ac Resid. 8-14 du/ac ZONING R-I-7200 R-I-7200 Open Space R-I-7200 PRD 12.5 u/ac GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOO HAZARD [XJ YES OZONE A ( SEWERS [) YES ) HAZARO ZONE rnNO ZONE DNO IXlZONE 8 DNO HIGH FIRE lX]YES AIRPORT NOISE / tJ YES REDEVELOPMENT DYES HAZARD ZONE ONO CRASH ZONE [Xl NO PROJECT AREA fJI NO .J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNI FICANT Z g APPROVAL ~ APPLICA8LE EFFECTS 0 WITH MITIGATING - KX Z(I) MEASURES NO E,I.R, t:c CONDITIONS LL1(!) o EXEMPT o E,I,R. REQUIRED BUT NO 1.1..0 0 DENIAL :':z 1.1..2 2- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS UJ 00 WITH MITIGATING ~~ 0 CONTINUANCE TO a::Z MEASURES (I):;;: S;LL 0 :z gNO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 0 LLI SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E, R. C, UJ EFFE CTS MINUTES a:: NOV. 1981 REVISED JULY 1982 SKY " " /. , ' : "'"" . L "Vi I I VI VI'\! '\l L{ i 11 '\lrU IViI '~'V I, h-/;..I. \ll \JH Y VlI.._1 "~I 111\11'-1'11 I .., ~ V C...SE IT i~? 10182,' & 0 -, r::')) [~ F'" '") , .,... '. r L1A ,-P. 84-11 f)\ ~~S' ~';\ r~~~ fk>> \\ .n 10' j't" n f\J] S AGENDA ITEM 14 , ~j) I~~ '<::::;;/ lhw I["\) 'U IF~ U U U \ ~.f1 HEARING DATE 12-4-04 PAGE 2 !. The applicant requests approval of Tentative Tract No. 10182 Amended #1, to subdivide 14.93 acres into 60 parcels and Lot Line Adjustment No. 84-11, to adjus~ the perimeter lot lines to conform to the project boundaries. The subject property is located on the west side of Olive 'Avenue, northerly of the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel, and southerly of Irvington Avenue. 2. Tentative Tract No. 10182 Amended #1, is a refiling of Tract 10182 which was approved in 1978 and has subsequently expired. The sub- division currently proposed is substantially different innumber of lots and configuration than that which was originally approved. 3. The subject property is zoned R-I-7200. The City of San Bernardino General Plan designates the property for residential uses at 4-7 dwelling units per acre. The current proposal will divide the 14.93 acres into 60 parcels. Each parcel created will contain a minimum area of 7,200 square feet and will conform to the San Bernardino Municipal Code requirements in terms of lot area, frontage and depth. The tract map will create an overall density'of 4.1 dwelling units per acre which will be in conformance ~th the General Plan and consistent with the requirements of the R-1-7200 Zone. 4. The proposed single-family subdivision is compatible ~th the sur- ,roiJndi ng area development and zoni ng . The property to th e north and east is zoned R-I-7200 and developed with single-family dwellings to the east and is vacant to the north. The vacant property to the north is planned for development with single-family dwellings. The property to the west is currently vacant and zoned PRD-12 u/ac. The property to the west is planned for development with apartments. 5~ To the south of the subject site is the Cable Creek Flood Control Channel. The channel currently has interim improvements which are not consi dered adequate to ~ thstand a major flood. Miti gati on of the flood hazard will be provided by a 100-foot structural setback, ele- vated building pads and other requirements of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and the City Engineer. 6. Tentative Tract No. 10182 Amended #1 represents one phase of a larger .development plan which includes Tracts 10182-10185 encompassing 32.59 acres to be divided into a total of 137 parcels. Tracts 10184 and 10185 are recorded. Tract 10182 has expired and is being refiled through the subject applicant. Tract 10183, however, ,has been pre- viously amended and is currently pending further revisions. Recorded Parcel Map No. 6755 divided 'the entire 32 acre site into the 4 parcels which were used to establish the boundaries for each indivi- dual tract. However, when Tract 10183 was originally amended, the boundaries of the tract changed and Lot Line Adjustment 83-22 was re- corded to amend the lot lines of Parcel Map 6755. ''VI I I "-" 'V"""'" ,...,.. ,......... """' I, I-'A'J' '"", '-'1-'. r,'" I 'If'''-I'J I o ~' \,.I CASE IT 1.01.&2 Amend. fi'O , W)) '''r= ,B)' '., """,;0 , (r"Y>. \ r ("'':I Il.. Adiust .~. 04-11 'O),t)\~~'~ n,lo,\\ \\Ofr) , II {)JJ)1~y. AGENDA ITEM 14 ~!) Il.a ,,-d/ U"",.. u ~'j I/';~ (J ~ I \J ~ HEARING DATE 12-4-04 PAGE 3 ...-----...- '- .;.. --- -- ........-....-...- 7. At this time, the additional amendment of Tract 10183 and the refiling of Tract 10182 have required further amendments to original lot lines as established through Lot Line Adjustment 83-22. Hense, the applicant has filed Lot Line Adjustment 84-11 to make the necessary changes to the recorded lot lines to bring the parcels established through the original Parcel Map 6755 into conformance with the amended tract map boundaries. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment 84-11 will slightly adjust the south and east tract map boundaries of Tract 10183. The southern lot line will be relocated approximately 40 feet northerly and the eastern lot line will be relocated approximately 30 feet easterly. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be dedicated and improved to meet City standards. /' -- 8. In several locations throughout the tract, the lot configuration is such that key lots will be created. A key lot is a parcel which has 2 or more rear lot lines of adjoining parcels forming its side boundary. San Bernardino Municipal Code Title 18, Section 18.40.300 indicates that the creation of key lots should be avoided whenever possible. Establishment of key lots encourages the individual lot owners to put up fences to provide privacy to their lot. To avoid this situation, Staff will require, through the conditions of approval, the applicant to construct 6-foot high block walls on the rear lot lines where key lots are proposed. In the event the Planning Commission approves the tentative subdivision map as submitted with key lots, the Planning Commission should condition those lots to have the garages placed on the property line proposed of the key lots. This is to insure visibility when backing out onto the street from the garage. A condition to this effect has been attached. 9. Approval of the tentative tract map and development of the property will' result in a major alteration of a prominent landform in the Verdemont area. The southeastern corner of the subject tract map encompasses 400 feet of the northwestern flank of a small raQge of foothills which is approximately 35 feet high in this location. The range extends approximately 1,350 feet easterly and reaches a maximum height of 65 feet. The foothills are,promi- nent features in the Verdemont area because they run parallel to the 215 Freeway and are located in the lower portion of the valley. The hills also provide valuable visual and noise screening between the existing single- ' family developments and the elevated freeway. In the development proposed through Tract 10182 Amended #1, tHe applicant plans to almost entirely grade down the eastern flank of the hill within the tract boundaries. After grading the hill, the remaining flat area will be utilized for a cul-de-sac and 4 parcels. A portion of the hill which will remain at a lower elevation after contour grading, wi 11 be left unde- veloped with landscaping. This area is shown as Lot "AU on the tentative map. Mai ntenance and landscapi ng of Lot "A" wi 11 be the responsi bi lity of J ~vll Y VI Of-\i\l 9'-,rU~nUii\1V (""L/A\1I\iJl'J' Cj UCk-I-\n l\Vi:C.\! ... 'V V '.....5E 1T 101&2 Ainend. It tf))nLJ;:~~':~[E[~x'V<.,l1jj)""'u':"[I((Jh\n~ AGENDA ITn~US14'~' -J. ~;/ ~ ~ __." U u \h:~ ",J) U '\J ~1J HEARING DATE 12-4-tlli PAGE 4 - r /' the proposed apartment project planned for the 23 acres located to the southeast of the subject property. The apartment project planned for deve- lopment by the same. applicant will ,result in the grading of the remaining 1,300 feet of foothills. These hills will be graded down approximately 30 'feet or 1/2 their original height. The remaining hills will be contoured graded to retain a natural appearance. Mai ntenance and 1 and scapi ng of Lot "A" wi 11 be the responsi bi li ty of the apartment project because its continued single ownership and the respon- sibility of that owner for maintenance and upkeep of the grounds. The single-family development, on the other hand, will be divided into indivi- dual ownership with no mechanism for maintenance of common open space areas. " Due to the natural slope of the land, grading will also occur between par- cels. In conformance with the San Bernardino Municipal Code, all graded slopes in excess of 3 feet wide will be located on the down hill parcel. 10. The applicant is also planning to locate a 24-foot paved access road at the ,bulb of the cul-de-sac which will provide secondary access to the adjoining apartment project. 11. The Environmental Review Committee found that Tract 10182 Amended #1 and tot Line Adjustment 84-11 will not create a significant effect on the environment nor, will it be subject to significant adverse environmental hazards. The Environmental Review Committee recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract 10182 Amended #1 and Lot Line Adjustment 84-11. The Committee noted that the project is located in a high wind and high fire hazard areil. Adequate public access is provided to the site to mitigate the potential hazard. The Committee recommended that contour grading be employed to lessen the impact caused by grading. The Committee additionally recommended that flood protection be provided as required by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and the City, Engineer. . ..-. .;..... -.. ....------.-- "Vf~T""'" ~ __~__ "";c&I~__ PLOi~'\H~',10 DEPANTMErO CASE 1'1' 10lbl A;.,1end. i;1 & Ff"" /7;, ,if". ~, "'l,"'" _LL A<). just LID. lS4-11 rt"'A\.v U AGENDA ITEM 1', HEARING DATE 12-4-04 PAGE, 5 ITY OF SAN Blt:ji~F~[H~JO "'''''''~~'~'D' RIA' nG~'~ po ~~ . ' '.' ~ H l',~ '.' -\.. _50 ",1lI It'' '~ \ ~ ) tJ lr~ . "'i"~ O~ Jlf':.F '3::Phr.I~~'''~l::aq lOlilTlf ~ 'In r FINDINGS OF FACT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10182 AMENDED #1 ;o.'ftf"oiM;.~ ':M..~ ~"'''''h .~ -- I. Tentative Tract 10182, Amended #1 is consistent with the San Bernardino Municipal code requirements for development in the R-l~7200 zone. 2. Tentative Tract 10182 Amended #1 is consistent with the City of San Bernardino General Plan designation of Residential 4-7 dwelling units per acre. , , 3. The single-family development proposed will be compatible with the existing and proposed surrounding development. 4. Tentative Tract 10182 Amended #1 is in compliance with Title 18 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. 5. Contour grading and landscaping will be utilized to mitigate the effect of grading on the existing foothills. 6. ,Subject to compliance with the standard requirements and conditions attached herein, Tentative Tract 10182 Amended #1 will not create a signi- ficant impact on the environment. Flood protection will be provided through compliance with the requirements of the San Bernardino County Flood' Control District and the City Engineer. ~ , FINDINGS OF FACT FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-11 1. Lot Line Adjustment No. 84-11 is consistent with the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino. 2. Lot Line Adjustment No. 84-11 is in conformance with Titles 18 and 19 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code and State Subdivision Map Act. 3. Subject to compliance with the standard requirements and conditions of approval listed herein, the lot line adjustment should not be detrimental to the general welfare of the citizens of the City of San Bernardino. ' \.. --- - ~ NOV. 1900 , CITY OF SAN BER ARDINO Pi.: CONDITIONS NNING 1Dl !='PAz ~Tl\1r:~" CASE LUlu krehe'f.;t '" lL Adiust do. b4-11 AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE 12-4-84 PAGE 6 'r .., CONDITIONS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10182 AMENDED #1 ,. 1. a) A 6-foot high decorative block wall shall be constructed at the rear of all lots which form key lots. A 6-foot high block wall shall be installed on the rear lot line of parcels: 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, and 22. b) A solid decorative wall of not less than 6 feet in height and land- scaped parkway area shall be constructed and maintained along the west and east property line. The block wall shall be constructed at the side lot line of parcels 29, 17, 44 and 1. The block wall shall be reduced to three feet in height when located within the required front or street side yard setback. 2. The development shall be designed in accordance with 8uilding and Safety Department's high wind and high fire standards. 3~ The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District as stated in their letter dated October 2, 1984. 4. The applicant is subject to the rules and regulations of the Water Department in effect at the time application for service is made. 5. An assessment district shall be established for the perpetual maintenance and upkeep of any perimeter landscaping and perimeter block walls. The applicant shall have the option of going to an assessment district or a homeowner's association as outline in Standard Requirement #2. 6. The homeowner's association or assessment district shall have respon- si bi 11 ty for 1andscapi ng mai ntenance and upkeep of Lot "A" as shown in Tentative Tract 10182 Amended #1, if the responsibility for landscaping and mai ntenance of sai d Lot "A" is not speci fi ca lly transferred to the apart- ment project locatd to the southwest of Tract 10182. 7. Lot "A" shall be landscaped and perpetually maintained in good condition. 8. A six-foot high decorative block wall shall be constructed adjacent to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District right-of-way. ' Add---- 9. Garages on Lots 11 and 30 of Tentative Tract No. 10182 shall be located nearest the lot line opposite the rear lot line which forms the key lot. ~ ~ . CITY OF SAN BER~Di;\!O~" P~~~NII\~G nh-.,'I:'~t,\t.iT~.1E.O , CASE T'f .LV1G.. J\I\lenu. 1f1 <:< C' 0,. f4\!l [F\\ n T. no, ,., [~~ (f:':"'" AGEND~\~~ust .~~4 C>4-lJ. , U \j L!..JJ U U' U \J ~ ' HEARING DATE 12-4-04 PAGE 7 .. ~'.....".__ A. _ --'l'!'IIi.~T- ~F .1l.~,;r:IiJf 7.'-"~"~'It:.~ .. .-..-~,.,....~ \ , CONDITIONS FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-11 1. A certificate of compliance for the lot line adjustment shall be required. -- -,..11 RECOM1\lENDATl ON: Based upon the observations and findings of fact above, Staff recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of Tentative Tract 10182 Amended II and Lot Line Adjustment 84-11, subject to compliance with the stan- dard requirements and conditions listed herein. Respectfully submitted, FRANK A. SCHUMA Planning Director (fn.A,~J, 'K f\ .. /, J..,;J- ,sfrtoJ( KNECHT Associate Planner . , - ...1.(,..... Of SPaN B "JNA!F~[)~N _.,,- \\ ~"lr'\\ 1M. fI'YJ~ ~ U ii.l~a'i.J~C"'j)'b""\liLv REQUJlFRfEr!JLENTS CASE TT 10182 Amend. #1 & II ^djll~t No 114-11 AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE 1 ~-04-84 PAGE w '"' RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT -- TT No. 10182 Amn. #1 shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department. HOI'/ever, if no map has been recorded at the end of the 24 -month time period the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planning Commission upon request of the applicant prior to expira- tion of the 24-month time period. Expiration Date: December 4, 1986 --Z-- COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D. --L . a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC&R's shall also include a statement that no radi 0 frequency antenna shall be included withi n the complex except for central antenna systems. b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a cor- poration, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evi- dence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not ,apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. c., Every 'owner of a dwe 11i ng unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the com- mon areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. d. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC&R's. e. The CC&R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside of the speci fi ed common areas. , \.. MAY'G4 ..J 8.R. fORM A PAGE I OF 5 . i TI lIl1\"4._4 I ., , SA~-~~~-JlJ\\~~)~ti'3 .-- CITY O~-:- CASE TT 10182 Amend. #1 & LL...Adjust. No 84::..1.1 AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE 1 ?-04-84_ PAGE 9 51'" ANDAfJD bqrEQl1J~[~!E~YJENTS -ur." . 1 . .iIn"'-'-'" ,. 1"J12lll ...~~ ~ 'l -.:lI!lilIJt . PARKING: a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of parking spaces. b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway. c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parki ng area physi cally from the resi denti ally zoned pro- perty, provi ded such wall shall be three feet in hei ght Imen located within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such Nall shall be three feet in height when located within ten feet of the street line. Said wall shall be located on the north . south . east . ~Iest or peri phera 1 property 1 i ne~- -- d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equiva- lent landscaped berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining resi- dential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure' the required front setback landscaping. Said Nall shall be located on the north , south . east , west , or peripheral property lines. All parking areas and 'vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours of darkness for security and protection. Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least a six-foot high decorative wall Nith screened gates. There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or other specifi ca 11 y desi gnated area, a loft or other us ab 1 e 'storage area with a minimum of 150 cubie feet in addition to standard utility storage. Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to the City Traffic Engineer's approval. 3 A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on Standard Drawing No. 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to the development. Location and design shall be subject to approval of the Engineering Division. ~ , ~ . s..,. fORM A. 'AGE t Of 5 MAY 84 u . CiTY OfF I ' SM~!l\jt~!F-lir}9~]< STb~NDA~D ~g:!t~,} n~[Y)ft:T\!r.r,:'U'),n-n"'~ ~"'a~~.~util\ik...~"Jth'- '\J U ~ CASE TT 10182 Amend. #1 & LL Adjust. No. 84~11 AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE 12-04-84 PAG E J.U . "...,'.~ Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to . the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the Planning Department. -L All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall. Location, size, type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Division of Public Services S4perintendent. Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local require- ments. -L LANDSCAPING: . a. Three copies of a master landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department/ Park and Recreation Department for review and approval. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the followi ng: 1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed. 2) Irrigation plan. 3) Such other alternate plants, materi als and desi gn concepts as may be proposed. 4) Erosion control plans. b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior to planting by the Director of the Park and Recreation Department or hiS/her designee. A minimum number of one-inch caliper/15 gallon, multibranched trees shall be planted within the parkway for each of the following type~ of lots, as per the City's specifications: 1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree; 2) Interior lot -- two trees; 3) Corner lot -- three trees. c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, sur- faces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with gr?ss or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical he1ght shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten ... MAY 84 .J Sft. fORM "A. - PAC[ SOl" . ( . OF SAL'\j BlE~IMA~b)DNO Sii AND,~~RD R[E(QU~R!Eli~iE[J\jTS " . -L ,-1- 8 -L '- MAl' 84 CASE TT 10182 Amend. #1 & LL AdJust. No. ~4-11 AGENDA ITEM 14 ' HEARING DATE 12-04-~4 , PAGE n .a 17 1 ;.~ -- " Teet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on centers; or a combination'of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10%, 15 gallon; 40%, 5 gallon; 50%, 1 gallon. Shrubs 20%, 5 gallon; 80%, 1 gallon. Ground cover 100% coverage. Three copies of the landscaping plan reflecting the above requirements and placement of street trees (if required) shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department and the Park 'and Recreation Department. d. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an irrigation system approved by the Park and Recreation Department. e; The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership. f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, sha 11 be donei n accordance wi th a gradi ng p1 an approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. All 'lots shall have a minimum area of]Z.QP square feet, a minimum depth of 100 feet, and a minimum width of 60 feet, (66 feet on corner lots). In addition, each lot on a cul-de-saeor on a curved street where the side lot, lines thereof are diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 60 feet measured at the building setback line as delineated on the tract map. Where lots occur on the bulb of the Cul-de-sac, a minimum lot depth ofl.OlL feet will be permitted. If the proposed depth is less than 100 feet, a PTOt plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possjb1e and to justify the lesser depth. ' Variable front building setback lines of at least 20 feet and averaging 25 feet, and side street building setback lines l~eet shall be delineated on-the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of 18 feet. Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features sUch as tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. ..J a.M. FORM A PAGE . Of $ . CDTV OF SAN rQRNA~iOD'~ STANDARD REQU~RE~~~ENTS CASE LL Adjust. No. 84-11 AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE ~ PAGE " , """I " 10 Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required (if applicable). Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site plan. ' ~ During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a , portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control. R- 14 15 16 \.. MAY 84 No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building unless screened as specifically approved by the Planning Department (except for solar collection panels). Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the maximum height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20 feet unless the Commission determines that due to unusual topographical or other features, such restrictive height is not practical. All utility lines shall be installed underground subject to exceptions approved by the Planning 'Department and the City Engineer. No certifi cate of occupancy shall be issued pri or to compli ance wi th these Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. ' ~ S,R, fOIl" A 'PAGE SOl'S. CITV OF S~..J (SERNARDRts> STANDARD REQUuRiEbVJEU\~TS - - -. CASE TT 10182 AmenctOl & LL Adjust. No. 84-11 AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE 12:194-84 PAGE 13 liI~~....,..c.os.'ll"r.r..r.v.w. 1'1. b<I.~-" QiI&.""'T III IlI"-. _...~~'n'......_-~~--...._~. ~...'-CoDa~~ " 17. Drainage and Flopd Control: 'a. , , ' I All necessary drainage and flood control measures sh~ll be sub- ject to the the recommendations of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (reference their1etter dated 12/13/84) for Tract 10183 and the re'quirements of the City Engi.ne-er. The developer's Engineer shall furnish a.11 necessary d<<ta re- lating to drainage and fl?Dd, control. ., '. ~ ,. b. Portions of the dev,elopment are'loc'ated wi.thin a Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps;, therefore, all building pads shall be raised ab.ove'the surr.ounding area as approved bY.the City, Engineer. c. 'Proper facilities for disposing of spring water from known ~ources or if discovered during constructton shalT be pro- vided to protect proposed building foundations. d. All drainage 'from the development sh~ll be directed'%o a public ,dedicated street. alley, or drainage facility. If this is not feasible, proper drainage facilities and ease- ments shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City' Engineer. ~~' 18. Fees to be paid to the City Engineer prior to recordation of the Final r~ap: a. An electrical energy fee for street lights for a period of 48 months. b. The ~eve10pment will use Pine Street for access; therefore, a fee for the proportionate share of the cost, of th~future project to extend Pine Street.to Kendall Drive tlill be required. The fee will be '$165 per lot. c. tach ,lot shall be assessed a Traffic Signal Construction Fee of $7.00. 19. Street Improvements and Dedications: a. All publ ic streets wi thin and adjacent to the development .shall be improveB to include combination ~urb and gutter, paving, ornamental street ligHts, and appurtenances as required by the City Engineer. .........A,.~...~~_ U -Ioo.D-"~~Iil'''-,.t.~'r.'>t_'''_''~............._...~4. I":IIS_..._ NOV. ,'Ul) .- -~~ .,."".,.,. . .-.. --. -. , , CITY OF SAflJ ~RNARIOBO REQUaRfEbVdE~.rrS CASE TT 10182 Amend. 1 & LL Adiust" No. 84-11 AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE 12-04-84 PAGE 111 f.or.u.....:.,.... L .1 ..e..t~ .... ,,',u:- ........... ...=-.U"'-. - --'"_.:a-..'- -.- ,- 1._ _.II~' " ,. b. The structural section for all streets shall be designed and submitted to the City Engineer for approval using a TI 'I assigned by ~he City Enginee~ and an R value obtained on the subgrade after rough grading"by a recognized soils testing lab. All streets shall have a minimum AC thickness of 2-1/2 inches. c. All driveway approaches shall be' constructed to City standards or as may be approved by t.he City Engineer. . I '. d. Street signs and other regulatory signs sball be installed at the developer's expense as ~equired by the City Engineer. . . .. e. The following one-half width streetCs) shall have a minimum paved width of 28 feet: All. f. Curb returns and corresponding property line returni shall be , provided a~ the intersectionCs) C20~foot radius for all streets g. For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-9f-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from'street ' centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to line of the street centerline shall be as follows (for the streets marked * the existing improvements shall be removed and replaced to the dimensions noted): I', I I I , S tree t Name Olive Stree't Stephanie Ave'nl!e A, D and E B, C and F R.W.(ft.) .32 ,30 30 25 C.l.(ft.) , 20 18 18 18 20. Grading: a. All gradi n,g sha 11 be done i ri compl i ance wi th Ti tle 15 of ,the Municipal code and the requirements of the City Engineer. b.'"Each parcel shall be graded to drain to a public dedicated street, alley, or drainage facility. If this is not ' feasible. proper dra~nage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. -.......,. ..,~::.~.._.,.."~...".....,,,---~-~.........-....__...--v. .....l-. "OY. "00 ..... ...., .... ~--...- " c) CITY OF STANDARD SA." I(;ANARD,DNO RlEQU~RE~~lENTS CASE TT 10182 Amend. 0 & LL Adjust. No. 84-11 AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE 12-04-84, PAGE ~ ~.....:art:l..... *'V~,~'i_ ._"";>>'IIlIa , --~- .I:D.~~' :t~~",,- - ~'C''"" " . e. All slopes shall bE!' contained ,within the lower parcels af- fected by the slope. In, some instances. this require- ment will necessitate the us~ of retaining w.11s or slope easements on adjacent property. d. Slope p1~nting with an irrigation system to prevent erosion shall be provided as specified by the City Engin~er. . ' 21. Util Hies: a. Each parcel shall be ,provided' wit'h separate water and sewer facilities so it can be served by t~e City. . b. 'A sewer backflow prevention device is required for all par- ce1s with building finished floors,lower than the nearest up stream manhole rim of the serving sewer main. ' c. Sewer main extensions required to'serve the site shall be constructed at the developer's expense. d. ,The existing sewer main within Stephanie Avenue shall be re10- ~ated as necessary and a~ approved by the City Engineer. e, Utility services shall be placed underground and ease- ments provided as required. . f. All existing overhead util i ties shall be phced underground in accordance with Section 18.40.380 of the City Code and shall be so indicated upon the improvement plans for the streets. 22. If the project is to be deve1ope.d 'in phases, each individual - phase shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, conveni- ence for public service vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. ~n order to meet thi$ requirement. the following will be re~uired prior to finalization of any phase: ' a. Completion of the improvement plans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond the phase boundary to ferify the fe~~i~ bi1ity of the design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b. A plan shall be ~ubmit'ed for,review,and approval by the Eng1- neer1rrg Division, Fire. and Planning Departments indicating what improvements will be constructed with the given phase, subject t the foll owing: . ...~._.. "~r .--~...~~ <4"tJl~...~ 11.....4..____..........._ ___._ -~~~~....!--~.. NOv. 14)UO . , '. CITY Of SAN ts:RNArRDIb'Q CASE TT 10182 Amend. 1 & LL Adjust. No. 84-11 REQUURlEMENTS AGENDA ITEM 14 HEARING DATE 12-04-84' PAGE 1/i . .I'.'W"lI- ___1 p- _':i , q~ - --:arV- -lI'1l~~ " (1) dead-end street shall be provided with a minimum 32-foot radius paved turnaround area. (2) half-width streets shall have a minimum 28-foot paved wid~~, (3) street improvements beyon:d t~e phase boundaries. as ne'ces- sary to provide .secondary ac~es~. (4) drainage faciliti~s, such as storm dra~ns. channels. eart~ ,ber~s, and block ~a11s, as necessa~y, to protect, the deve!op 'ment from off~site flows. . (5) a properly designed water system capable of provid- ing required fire flow, perhaps looping or extending beyond the phase boundaries, (6) easements for any of the above and the installation of nec- essary utilities, and . (7) phase boundaries shall correspond to the lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 23. In addition to the phasing requirements stated above, a ~edi- cated and improved secondary access roadway shall be provided , for the total project. The minimum roadway section shall consist of a 24 foot AC ~aved width (2 inc~,AC thic~ness) with. 6 foot wide graded shoulder on each side. The pavement shall be de-' signed and constructed in such a manner that it can be utilized in the ultimate structural section of a future street. The pavemeht shall be designed t~ accept a 1 inch Overlay to be placed at the time that the re~irider of the street pavement is constructed. . Prior to the recordafi'on of the Final M'aps. a lot line..adjust-' ~ent shall be completed to adjust the lot lines of Parcel Map No. .6755 to correspond t!l the boundaries of the proposed tracts and eliminate the remainder p4rce1s shown on the tentative map. ' .. .~-..a--VK . - ....... 140V.I!lOti ,......... "'I"'" .. _t.:lo npp-=-~_' ~_ 1;1' -...,..__._..-_,.. M y '. . t'. _.._...._.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION' FLOOC>CONTROL/AIRPOC.S 0 0 , "",,',' "'",?"",., ___"'...."'" '.. '". ,"'L,', . '. '<".. . ;. ,v," t."Z,t~ nNIW.-i:JMIINI,~t'.'~"~.f).:".' . ~~.' .. " <~j.~/''; ~:'~-j."i:" 825 East Third Street . San Bernardino. CA 92415'()835 . (7141383. 2388 " COUNTY Of SAN ..tl<~........ ENVIRONMENT.l" PUBLIC WORKS AG!')=- _~~''-f;.~:-t~"..:./,ic:. ;:;-_"_':';~~~' .!;~11!t October 2, 1984 File: 2-309/1.00 ~ ~~ "\1 ",7 ~ {ill' l~ "" [r, I \'J L:; Ill' I . :. . ... City of San Bernardino Planning Department 300 North no" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 OCT t) 5 1981t ell\' PLM\lNi~G OEPAnTM~NT sm BER~JARDINO. CA Attention: Ms. Ann Larson Re: Zone 2, Cable Creek Channel Tentative Tract 10182 " I II II t., Gentlemen: By your transmittal received on September 7, 1984, this office was requestec to review and comment on the subject tract located on the east side 0: Olive Avenue, and approximately 318 feet south of Irvington Avenue, in the northwest portion of the City of San Bernardino. The tract. in general, lies downstream of several mountainous drainage areas. Drainage flows outlet these areas through several natural drainage courses, including Bailey and Meechem Canyons. In the event of a major flood, drainage flows could overflow the drainage courses upstream of ,the tract and traverse portions of the tract. In addition, the tract is traverse<:. ,by drainage flows originating from a combined tributary drainage area 0: approximately 430 acres to the north. Also, the southwesterly portio," of Tract 10182 is located adjacent to the Flood Control District's Cabl~ Creek Channel. Cable Creek Channel has interim improvements consisting of an earth-graded channel with rail and wire bank protection. This facility. although able to handle runoff from most small floods, is not considere= adequate to withstand a major flood. Cable Canyon Channel has a large mountainous, tributary drainage area of approximately 9 1/2 square miles to the northwest. Serious erosion and overflow did occur along Cable Cree~ during the 1969 flood. As the area, continues to "buildout" the erosio," problem(s) will continue to worsen unless mitigation measures and/or upgradi~~ of the facility are accomplished. Therefore, in our opinion, portions of the tract are subject to infreque~~ flood hazards due to overflow, erosion and debris deposition from tributarj drainage from the north and could be subject to infrequent flood hazar=~ due to overflow, erosion and debris deposition from Meechem and Bai:e1 Canyons in the event of a major flood and breakout of flows upstrear.. The southwesterly portion of Tract 10182, adjacent to Cable Creek Channe:~ is subject to infrequent flood hazards by reasons of overflow, erostc~; and debris deposition until permanent channel and debris retention facilitte:!-' have been provided. ~.. +-- o L'_--- ".- - . () Letter to the City October 2, 1984 Page 2 ( 0'1' San Oard ino o ( o Our recommendations are as follows: " 1. It is recommended that a 10Q-foot minimum, as shown on the tentati.e map be established from the existing Flood Control District Cab:= Creek Channel right-of-way. The recommendation has been follo"oJe:: on the tentative map accompanying the request. Proposed Lot 1. does not appear to have an adequate building site. 2. That area adjacent to Cable Creek Channel should be raised t~ an, elevation equal to the top of the channel levee. All bulldi::g padS shall be adequately elevated to preclude Cable Creek overflc_ from damaging proposed ,structures and to con from to the Federa: Insurance Administration requirements. 3. That adequate provisions shall be provided to intercept and conduc~ the tributary drainage flows from the north and west plus possib:= overflow from Bailey and Meechem Canyons around or through t~= site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstrea:: properties.Watercarrying streets with elevated lots, maso::r-:' block walls, or a combination of methods could be utilized. 4. A permit will be required for any encroachment onto Flood Contr-~: District right-of-way, and a minimum of six (6) weeks process:::f time should be allowed. As the area develops, the existing and proposed streets may become subjec~ to excessive street flows. It is recommended a separate report be obtaine~ from the City Engineer in this regard. The proposed subdivision is i= the upper reaohof Comprehensive Storm Drain Project No. 7-E8 and the Ci~: Engineer should be contaoted with respect to the subject of looal draina~= problems, oonstruction scheduling, and financial mechani sms required :;: alleviate the local drainage problem. ' If this office can provide any further assistance, please contact the under-- signed at the above telephone number. V/J I.t:U1Y YOU;ty.. .1h~ - - tu.,lt4....rY' ~~.i'4[~~ ALLAN J. K~HOLD, Chief Water Resources Division AJK:H'''S:mjs 00: City Engineer FCD Permits . o (0 0 ( Southern California E~ison compa,ill ,. ;,.,,0 ~ :: t . , ,'. L.~ P.O. BOX .'0 100 LONG BEACH BLVD. SEP 281984 LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90801 CITY PlANNE:G OE;:hf,;:.~ENT SAt~ BERNARQINO. CA C. J. LOWERISON. JR. MANAGER o. ..HilMi OF WAY AND LAND / Honorable City Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 September 21, 1984 Gentlemen I SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map No. 1018~ Please be advised that the division and development of the property shown on Tentative Tract Map No. 10182 will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by Southern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said tentative tract map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights, title and interest in and to said easement(s), nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any of the provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of any costs for relocation of affected facilities. In the event that the development requires relocation of facil- ities, if any, on the subject property by right of easement or otherwise, the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost of such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the relocation. If additional information is required in connection with the above mentioned subject, please call me at (213) 491-2648. /J I ,.: U .'Y>'-A.< rv-{)c:~, A. KNUDSEN Supervisor, Land Administration rK"-' ;.-e' - ~~~-_. It.,:.~, ',rt I -'- ....... Very truly yours, 629l(2)/gr c, " d,] 1;,: .:;".\1. ." \i,v. r.: ': cc: R. C, Schaefer ~,1. ;: f~ :.... R ,: ~.t( ~ ,.. _h ,.,),.. \\ .... r:IL~_ . I -'=tf-~~(vc_t!~v{/~ _~~{V I LEGAl DESCRIPTION: BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL I . 2, PARCEL IlAP 110. 6155, AS RECORDED IN IIODlt 66, PAGE 44, RECORDS OF SAIl BERIlARDINO COUltTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA o , I\~rv~&;..{ I I I rJ I ' I ! ,1-.--------- 'c -_._'-\ I ' \ I .". I \ 'f ' " I '. , ,'... r-----. J t lhafO' ~ ' . " , ....-- "J....~+J.SJ. ___lIIl,___ ___.1 ,'----f-.....:.. "'-liO.'-"-i~""" (~.:~~' \~:u.o' <'':''~s.l l I'" ('4-7,/S" '909,1 I -r-"'" '-r- I I I I 1=.'1" ;. I I. "'I I f. tl I'" .. L_-, .. '. I'" I _ -V.,o I I It-A<- '315' '~; ~1..,"7"''''i'~'2D' I ( If:" A&' . I L.'3'.fJ' ot ", I'...... .. ~~~'I .1 "': s", . ~ I ~~ I L.~"J.'f' M TENOIT/VE TRACT JIg 10182 : o,~LI(, a~~'l.~' 3' ". \.".f" , . I ~J ~I I I#(.().67' "'''1.5' I -- _.- -- -+ - __l:J _ ""./), - - "I-..1!7.;.1.!'.J 0lIIER: SllAIlOII MEADOlIS 4140 YON lWIWl NEVP T BEACH, CA 92_ ' IRV/IoICTOII -r-/.- i\ I -r~ I ,,:/1/ /_ -r,.. 'Ir-,. ,-' . '( /"'\ '.' , /' /',," " I,,:<~ , -, ...., , ~ li I I -,-'" ^,"-,. I . /-(:-\\J/ , In '''-::z: r' /t..!'CJ-. ~ ~ 2..' /t./.,.,_ -1..--- aN ,.1" 101 ~'- - - - \ v Associated Engineers lIS W. HOSPITALITY LANE. SUITE 15 SAN BERNARDINO. CA. 12401 (714) III-CNt'I A I~'~.L.~ : .1.~/-'4- R.C.E No. 28 DAft, . . o SUBDIVIDER: DOMINION-SUNflOWER PROPERTIES 4740 VON KARIWl NEIIPORT BEACH, CA 92660 AVENuE ... - -,-r-/l '-r' , /::. \/ /. -, -I; 1\ ('-r ,,'\,'""\......, //"/8 r:- I ,,/, ~., " -,-,.. " "-r Iliti~_! Oj/al ! L., ,) PtroPOSE"/) Loi LINE ~"'AN'FS . VI(..IN ITY M":;; -. ---. '.. . Q.. .. , ': I :: 1 ! . I ':! f ,i I ! I i I I & . ! !II ~ ; .. .. , ',HI il Ii f i 01 ~. 0' to !l .; i ~ hi I! 'i '=1'; ,i II ci; 1.01 Pail 'I'J.,I,II'~I;I ~l GirtH 'li~l!a~lIni.l U! I! ,! :'IJf:tI,le. il i , i ,~ I !iih! lit /U'ill I II t .1 I II I I i I I .iI '.,. III .,.1 ail 0,.., ii' I I ' ,. I 1111' il.JPI'! 'It"l '. ) 0-. . " I ., i o .' . ,j I -l .'" i~ !~ ,'" E~ I~ !-l . 1- IQ Ql N -' ) , ( o o o Q ( \. ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT' " , AGENC":' " ITEM ;;= LOCATION CASE ~.T. #101b2 & L.L.A. /fb4-11 14 HEARING DATE 12104/134 ... , ~ .... ~ " /~ ,.. f"V"" , '-' 'M): " ft.,,: , ~ R-I-IACRE '''=800' R-I-72ClO "'-2