HomeMy WebLinkAbout56-Planning
& . . .
CITY OF SAN BERORDINO - REQUEST CPR COUNCIL ACTION
From:
R. ANN SIRACUSA
Subject:
Status Report on
Permit 86-44
conditiona~
Council M~
2:00 p.m.
Dept:
Planning
"_~ _ ,~- ..~ ',,; OFF.
;.. ',' -.;. .............
Date:
May 19, 1988
.. ...,'")'; "\ 10: 41
I,," L.
Mayor and Common
of June 6, 1988,
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
On November 5, 1986, Conditional Use Permit 86-44 was approved, subject
to conditions by the Planning Commission.
On April 21, 1987, the Planning Commission denied a requested amendment
to conditions.
On May 18, 1987, the Mayor and Common Council continued the appeal of
that decision to November 17, 1987.
On November 17, 1987, the Mayor and Common Council continued the appeal
decision to February 15, 1988.
On February 15, 1988 the Mayor and Common Council continued the appeal
decision to June 6, 1988.
Recommended motion:
Authorize expenditure of the $1,200 cash deposit and have the City
complete the required improvements.
Contact person:
R. ANN SIRACUSA
Phone:
384-5357
Supporting data Bttached: Staff Report
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount:
~Pr
Source: (Acct, No.!
(Acct, DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
75.0262
SP/csj
Agenda Item No. ...s-6
CITY OF SANCBERNARDINO
-
<:MEMORANDUM
To Mayor and Common Council
From R. ANN SIRACUSA
Director of Planning
Date June 6, 1988, 2:00 p.m.
Su~ect Status Report - Conditional Use Permit
No. 86-44
Approved
Date
PURPOSE
This status report has been prepared pursuant to direction
given to staff by the City Council on February 15,1987" to
monitor the implementation of the conditions imposed on
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44 and to report back to the
Council in three months.
BACKGRQt!~
Request
Conditional Use Permit 86-44 was a request by Robert L.
Fisher, Sr. to establish an indoor shooting gallery retail
store and training facility at 766 South Lugo in the C-M,
Commercial Manufacturing Zone. The proposal was to convert
an existing warehouse-type structure into an indoor shooting
range.
!..9~ation
The subject site is located on the west side of Lugo Street,
north of Central Street at 766 S. Lugo. The site is not
within any Redevelopment Project Area. It is located within
Airport District v.
History
The application for CUP 86-44 was received by the Planning
Department on September 16, 1986. On October 2, 1986, the
Environmental Review Committee recommended a Negative
Declaration be issued for the Conditional Use Permit.
November 5, 1986, the item appeared on the Planning Commi.s-
sion Agenda. With agreement from the applicant, CUP 86-44
was approved on the consent agenda, subject to Conditions and
Standard Requirements contained in the staff report. Includ-
ed in the approval letter is a standard statement, -The
decision of the Commission shall be final unless appealed in
writing to the Mayor and Common Council. The written appeal
shall be submitted to the office of the City Clerk within 15
days of the decision.- However, Mr. Fisher elected not to
appeal the Planning commission decision.
Mr. Fisher proceeded
modifications.
with
interior
alterations
and
i;f;
'~'. ' , (.:~
,.... '_ ..It
,b;.; !t~;, ;ii
:.,~\,,>
,
.
o
o
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 6, 1988
Status Report - Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
Appeal of Conditions
Page 2
January 26, 1987, Mr. Fisher requested by letter amendments
to the following Conditions:
1. 10. r;,e.locll.te tbJL.E.H,e.J2.f, ,t.be.,bAnqj.PAlLPflrking space. The
applicant requested to relocate the stall to the north
property line. This would require maneuvering across
the drive aisle by a handicapped individual.
2. Delete theplanteL.Qn the nor.tb, a.ide ,of...the.. parcel. San
Bernardino Municipal Code Section 19.56.120.A.5 requires
landscaping in open parking lots be a minimum of 5' of
the paved area. The landscaping shall include one tree
for every ten spaces or fraction thereof. Landscaping
shall be approved through submission of landscape plans
to the Engineering Department for approval. Staff
required landscaping of the north and south property
lines in an attempt to meet this standard requirement.
After reevaluation, staff proposed landscaping be
relocated from the south property line to the north
building elevation.
3. T~A~h.e~clo~u~~"x~19~ation. The applicant requested
approval to relocate the refuse enclosure 10 feet to the
east of the previously approved site. The requested
location did not interfere with circulation nor parking.
4. Southerly", d~jveway cloBure. As required by the
Engineering Department, the southerly driveway was to be
removed and replaced with standard curb and gutter.
5. Parking lo~.atLlping. Staff required restriping in the
rear of the building to allow circulation, primarily for
refuse trucks which will be required to drive the full
length of the property to reach the refuse enclosure.
To enable the large trucks to continue in forward motion
and eliminate backing, deletion of six parking spaces is
necessary.
6. Landscaping in. the fr;p~t,~etback area. In an attempt to
improve the elevation of the existing structure, staff
required landscaping adjacent to the building on the
east elevation. This was to extend to the width of the
porch plus the width of a four foot sidewalk, or nine
feet. The existing asphalt abuts the base of the
building creating a stark appearance. Once the
elevation is improved with the required planter area,
and once the required ten foot setback from the east
property line area is landscaped, a 10 foot strip of
asphalt would bisect the two areas. Staff included a
condition which required the 10 foot strip of asphalt to
be removed and replaced in landscaping to create a
.
o
o
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 6, 1988
Status Report - Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
Appeal of Conditions
Page 3
cohesive landscape area and
elevation.
an attractive street
January 27, 1987, a cash deposit was received by the City to
guarantee installment of the refuse enclosure, and the
required front setback and parking lot landscaping. Mr.
Fisher was given 90 days to complete the required work with
the understanding the City would use the funds to complete
the work if it was not done within the 90 days. No deposit
was received for the removal of the driveway and installment
of the curb as required by the Engineering Department.
February 24, 1987, Mr. Fisher paid the fee required for an
amendment to Conditions and the request began processing
through appropriate channels. It was subsequently placed on
the Planning Commission agenda for April 21, 1987.
April 20, 1987, a letter was hand-delivered by the applicant
requesting a continuance of the item from the meeting of
April 21, 1987 based on reasons of health. By the time the
letter was delivered, staffs report and recommendation had
been prepared, printed, and delivered to the Commissioners.
April 21, 1987, the amendment to condition request
on the Planning Commission agenda. The action
Commission was as follows, taken from the minutes
meeting:
"Edward Gundy presented comments, noting the
request for the applicant and location of the site.
Mr. Gundy stated that the cost of improvements
should not be considered a reason for waiver of
conditions. He noted that the applicant has posted
a cash deposit in lieu of completion of improve-
ments. He also noted that the applicant has
installed signage on the east and west elevations
without proper permits or approval.
appeared
of the
of the
Mr. Gundy noted staff's recommendation for
modification to conditions regarding the location
of a landscaped strip and the location of the
refuse enclosure. He stated that staff also
recommends that all signage be installed per Code
requirements.
Mr. Anderson stated that staff had received a
request from the applicant for continuance of the
item. Mr. Anderson read the applicant's submitted
letter requesting continuance of the item.
The public hearing was closed.
L'
.
o
o
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 6, 1988
Status Report - Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
Appeal of Conditions
Page 4
Commissioner Knowles stated that he recalled that
this item was on the Consent Agenda when it was
originally approved and the applicant voiced no
concerns regarding conditions. He stated that he
concurred with staff's report.
Commissioner Knowles made a motion to approve the
recommendation of staff, as contained in the
memorandum to the Planning Commission dated April
21, 1987, for modification (as follows) to condi-
tions I 5 and I 7, with no further modifications to
conditions.
"Conditions:
5. Refulle ellclQ$\)~,~ ,to, PEl_ulocat~q, .1.0 feet
.to, tp~__east. ~er si te ~lan markeq A-3. and
date.d ,~pJ:_i~ ,.21. 1987." (Attachment "A",
Site Plan)
7. "R.l~Jl~ElJ;. . ,area .C!dja,qEll)t., ,t;Q,..thfL.. south
property l.i.ne. s~U,.~e.. U.lQCa,t,ed.to the
north side of the e~i.stin9-buil41ng. ~er
the site plan mC!rke<'l A-~.c!l)<3. ~,Clte13 At>ril
Zl.. 1987."
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lightburn
and carried unanimously."
April 30, 1987, the applicant appealed the Commissioner's
decision in a letter received by the City Clerk. The letter
cited "difficult hardship to health, business, and emotional
stress" as the basis of the appeal.
May 18, 1987, the item appeared on the Council agenda. Action
at that meeting was as follows, based on the minutes of the
meeting:
"Mr. Fisher explained that meeting all the condi-
tions as imposed by the Planning Department would
pose a financial hardship on him, and felt that
many of the conditions were not necessary. He
referred to the general run-down condition of the
general area in which his business is located.
Mr. Fisher also explained that the parking require-
ment of 32 parking spaces is excessive, as most of
his customers are there at night when adjacent
businesses are closed.
.
o
o
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 6, 1988
Status Report - Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
Appeal of Conditions
Page 5
Mr. Fisher explained what he had already accomp-
lished with street improvements and landscaping. He
had conferred with Mr. Anaya of Parks, Recreation
and Community Services regarding the landscaping,
but did not have a plan prepared.
Vince Bautista, Principal Planner, stated that all
of the conditions being requested as part of the
CUP are standard conditions placed on other similar
applications. He stated that the $1,200 bond is in
for the landscaping, not for street improvements.
Council Member Quiel made a motion, seconded by
Council Member Reilly and unanimously carried, that
the matter concerning CUP No. 86-44 be continued to
November 16, 1987, that the conditions recommended
by the Planning Commission remain the same, but
that applicant Mr. Fisher be given a year in which
to perform and complete those conditions, giving
priority first to the handicapped parking and
removal of the drive approach in front of the
facility and then meeting the other conditions
within 12 months from today's hearing. Within the
next six months, staff will inspect the site, with
a report back to the Council on November 16, 1987,
as to the conditions and status of progress in
meeting those conditions."
At the Mayor and Common Council meeting of November 16, 1987,
a status report was presented. There had very little progress
at the site and the item was continued three months to
February 15, 1988. At the February 15, 1988 meeting,
considerable progress toward compliance was reported. However,
several problems were still evident. The item was continued
and the applicant was given until May 18, 1988 to comply with
conditions of approval.
1. The handicap parking stall had been appropriately
relocated. However, the wheel-stop required by code has
not been installed, nor had the Handicap sign required by
State law been installed.
2. Neither the planter which was changed from the south
property line to the north elevation of the building, nor
the planter on the north property line had been
installed. Instead, wheel-stops had been installed.
3. The refuse enclosure had been constructed. However, in a
memo from Steve Enna, April 17, 1987, it was noted to the
Planning Department, "The trash enclosure does not comply
.
,
o
o
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 6, 1988
Status Report - Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
Appeal of Conditions
Page 6
with City Standard 1508 and was not inspected."
4. The curb and gutter had been installed.
5. The portion of the parking lot adjacent to the building
had beennot restriped and accommodates approximately 12
cars. The parking area behind the building has not been
striped. A fence and gate were relocated from the front
of the building. The gate is locked and prevented access
for vehicles or the refuse truck. The areas where the
fence posts were originally located were hazardous. The
posts were cut off. Jagged edges of the posts remained
above ground. The posts were not filled in and there
were two inches diameter holes in the parking lot.
6. The front setback had been planted in lawn with 4 small
palm trees. There is no documentation that landscape
plans were processed appropriately by the City.
7. A sign review was performed on November 20, 1987 for one
(1) sign. However, there were three (3) signs located on
the building, two (2) on the east elevation and one (1)
on the south elevation. The roof sign had been removed,
but the large bull's-eye remained propped against the
building's west elevation. Council continued the items
to June 6, 1988 to allow Mr. Fisher adequate time to
complete improvements imposed as Conditions of Approval.
ANALY~~
The applicant, Mr. Fisher, on May 10, 1988, called the
Planning Department stating all conditions had been met and
the site was ready for inspection. As a result of that phone
call, City staff visited the site on Friday, May 13, 1988 (see
Attachment "B", Memo). The following is an update of the
problems noted on February 8, 1988.
1. The handicap sign required by State law to be posted has
n.ot been posted.
2. The planter on the north building elevation has been
installed. No landscape and irrigation plans were
received by the City, and no inspections of the
irrigation system were made. Landscape plans submitted
earlier in the year were rejected as inadequate by the
Parks Department and no revisions were submitted. On
Friday, May 13, 1988, a hose from the building to the
planter was being used to water the ivy planted.
3. The landscape planter required on the north property line
has not been installed. Wheel stops remain along the
.
o
o
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 6, 1988
Status Report - Conditional Use permit No. 86-44
Appeal of Conditions
Page 7
chainlink fence.
4. The refuse enclosure does not comply with City Standard
1508. The wood-slatted chainlink gate has not been
replaced with the required steel gate. The construction
on the block enclosure was not inspected and it is
unknown if appropriate reinforcement is included.
The area adjacent to the refuse enclosure remains a weed-
filled hole in the asphalt.
5.
The twelve parking stalls adjacent to
remain. The additional 20 parking stalls
Code have not been striped. Area to the
fence is available for the parking stalls.
6. The lawn planted in the front setback is growing and
appears to be maintained.
the building
required by
rear of the
7. There is no evidence sign permits were obtained for two
of the three signs installed on the building. The large
plywood bullseye that was propped against the rear of the
building is lying face down in the parking area.
In addition, an A-frame portable sign, prohibited by Code
is now located on the lawn between the building and the
street.
8. The fence post holes have not been filled with concrete.
(See Attachment .C., xerox of pictures.)
~YOR AND~OUNc~~,Q~TIONS
By previous Council action, the applicant has until May 18,
1988 to implement all Conditions of Approval.
The Mayor and Council may:
1. Uphold the appeal and delete the conditions not met.
2. Continue the item to allow more time to complete the
improvements.
3. Deny the appeal and revoke the Conditional Use Permit
since conditions are not met.
4. Authorize expenditure of the $1,200 deposited with the
City and complete the improvements.
.
, .
o
o
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 6, 1988
Status Report - Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
Appeal of Conditions
Page 8
CONCLUSION
At the time of staff inspection, it was noted that little
progress has been made since February toward meeting the
conditions of approval. There is still a considerable amount
of work that remains to be done. That work includes:
1. Locate a wheel-stop and install a sign in front of
the handicap stall. Remove the wheel stops installed
where the setback lawn abuts the parking lot and
install the required 6 inch curb.
2.
Install the 3-foot wide landscaped
6-inch curb to separate the planter
along the north property line.
planter and the
from the parking
3.
and irrigatin plans
to the Engineering
Submit the required landscape
with the $50.00 plancheck fee
Department.
4. Install the refuse enclosure in compliance with City
Standard No. 508.
5. Restripe the parking area to the rear of the build-
ing in accordance with the approved plan.
6.
permits for all signs installed on
Remove the large bull's-eye that
the rear parking area. Remove
A-frame sign.
the
is
the
Obtain sign
bu ild ing .
laying in
prohibited
The City has $1,200 cash deposited to guarantee installation
of the required improvements,
m:CO~NDATION
It is recommended that
expenditure of the $1,200
the required improvements.
and Council authorized
with the City to install
the Mayor
deposited
Prepared by: Sandra Paulsen, Senior Planner
Attachment "A" - Site Plan
Attachment "B" - Memo from Engineering
Attachment "C" - Photographs
SP:lmc:cms
M&CCAGENDA.CUP8644
5/23/88
~r;
._1 _ ,1/:'
.:.. '. ~
;r-.;" t-
-.t' -: ,I ..
~.=,'. . r k-
.J~~ . It ~-
.,. .-:..
-7i: [ ..
. .0: 9f~.
~;:o.... .-
~. .-.
... .. . ~
. - 'lI ..
. .
.
-.
... .
....
. -.
'J~'
aliI I
,. - ~ Z'
~:iJi ~;
.," ..
~~,.i r-
.1;lfo,'i"" .
~ ~....
--. ... ",.
,.-f'. .
.
.
.
.
. .
-
..-
..
-..
"c
=,-
I Z. C'
(','
- Ii
....
"@)
. ,1 MoJ;. .'~d .
~ STr'.f.r\:~
~,-for- .) .
A...l/llfWu ~'W i l.t\.~ro"Ve.J.
LItISnltJ...&b FMr ..-
ON tV1JJ..Jv c., (' c..\.C.l iC\-t\ ot\.
.
"
..
>
~
~ \
: 1 "
:-- ~" I. " .~, '....... .
~,)_"......."..1I'.:_..
'_ l!'_
'~[(:b"
"oJ t. ~
rGT~~'i
,... ,..\,6
A lo.....~-J....,
. tF - 1.~~.
J ~.
o
'1; .... ..
:- ... .- .."
o
.
..
L.-:'
r
lit I
~
.
- 19-~
:,. ,
.
~
;
.........
..,.;
~
. ~.1 AIt1E'NbMB'1JT s AS pt.ofJ()seli. BY STAFF
~
.t r- -Ii. of 1.J,JC::IO ,,-VE:tJUE=. A-IdA.dt' '--'1 A:-~
.. ' f\" ~'-. , men . ..,
;0.; ''I ~ =--~:--i ..;- '" ..PJ,/!-nninq COlNllission Approved 4/21 f
. I
I
.
;
.
"
i..
.
: 11) ':
".,
i~
Att;achment "An
-' .
. :=t r
- - '-... .....
.~
. .A-;i. 4
'/:. . :L
r.:; -
'. '~", (~1t.~,b~"i '-"
'. ' :r 1,)\ .,j)> I I
. -.,. . I .,' .
. . ':"'_.:.,. . 1
. ,'.Jt " '. ....
" '---fi-.. - "'~' ,
eo- ...1' -":,",,:, ~ .J.i-::
-
"-
'.
. '
~
. .
':.
/f
..
...'
~
.. ."
~.
~
IE'. :
~,
~
.,
.'
J
~
-
.
"
.
.
-'.. .-
~
-
. .
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Attachment "B"
o
MEMORANDUM
-
SANDRA PAULSEN. Associate Planner
To
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE. Dir.
From Public Works/City Eng.
Date May 16. 1988
File No. 9.05, CUP 86-44
Subject 766 S. Lugo Street
Approved
Date
Reference: Memo of 4117/88
Our inspection of 766 S. Lugo was made on Monday. May 16. 1988. Items
still incomplete as of this date are as follows:
1) The handicap parking stall is finished. but the handicap sign as per
Title 24 is not complete.
2) The trash enclosure has a ~in link fence gate which is not per City
Standard.
3) Fence posts have been cut at ground level in lieu of removal of the
pole base as is required.
4) Fence posts are slightly protruding above ground level and have jagged
edges.
5) On the Northwest side of the parking lDt next to the trash enclDsure.
a hole exists which needs to be compacted and patched with asphalt,
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
2L VVltl-<i
RICHARD MORALES
CDnstruction Inspector
RM:pa
.
~ ..""
. >,~,
, ;
., ; 'I
~"'"t"y?
.......,ir":,
.
~
.c ,j
"'"
....0
'S "
>.
Cl,C
00
....'"
OJ CU
...
8:<:
......
".c
..... 0
.::: ~
,C
"
'"
"'"
cu
: "
"'....
'"
cu cr
" cu
cu "
'S OJ
....
OJ
Cl.Cl
o 0
.......
OJ ...
..
.... "
cu cu
cu Cl.
'S :l
cu
"
'" "
OJ ..
o cu
.... "
"
Cl cu
cu.c
...
cu
OJ Cl
"'....
.....
CU.c
" "
"'CI~~
" Cl."
~"'CI UI
Cl CU 00
.. CU Cl
...;0....
OJ .loI
.0"'"
,,~ c: qS
.. .. Cl.
~
o
Attachment "Cn
o
I
I
..- "'?
"...~..~.""'-<....;....
.. , . ^o
.. ,
;~. .
~;~,..
:1tf
.','U:
.;.#a
..
..
"
..
.. ..
>'Cl
......
""
'" "
.... ..
....Cl.
'"
.0 "
..
'" OJ
o "
o
~~
....
Cl.'"
..
.. ...
....
" "
.. 0
........
t:
o "
.... OJ
......
.. ..
> ;0
Cl ..
0.... 0
.....
'"
OJ ..'"
..... s:: Q)
Cl:I'~ tI.l
U'" '"
0....-1
,..of oM Q)
'" '"
~..o 0 >.
OJ .c >
....c ....
t:.....,.c
(U 1-I.j,.IQJ
~ 0 ......c
0. s:: ):.u
.
.
o 71-:30-8 7
-/~- C1 $~' ~ ~
~~,k- ,A ~Zl-~/'~~
~ "~~,,~
~~~ ~ .z,.7
c (/ rtlt..../f 'f'
o
--<4'
'~~
~.
S4v ;3jF,^,A/~i/uvo ~176,u{/,G?/~C~
"l66Souif' L U00 ~ .
StfA..--13~ ;v/f-~j)"".:/ t/ (' /'l ~
. .,. ?/tr:-,.5'c?C/-sS'?y,
-!t, ..~
I'. <:
, g:
-..-~
-
.. -<
... .. --N. .~
I m
.." _....._~ .,~ .
CI+V OF SAN ct.:RNARDINO
-
~,EMORANOUM
3"z
,.' .
To Planning Commission
Subject Amendments to Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
From Planning Department
Date Apr i1 21, 1987
Approved, ..
=i1q...1 Ita", Mg.]. Wlrd Ng. ]
Date
Owner: Majestic Realty Co., &
Patrician Assoc., Inc.
3200 Crossroads Park, '400
City of Industry, CA 91746
Applicant: Robert L. Fisher, Sr.
12391 Sampson, Ste, 10
Riverside, CA 92503
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44. to establish an indoor shooting gallery at
766 South Lugo Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on ,
November 4, 1986. Said approval was subject to conditions and standard
requirements as attached.
The applicant requests to amend the following conditions (See attached letter):
1.
2. Delete the lanter on the north side of the arcel.
an ernar 1no un c pa 0 e ect on . . ..5 requires
landscaping in open parking lots be a minimum of 5S of the paved
area. The landscaping shall include one tree for every ten spa-
ces or fraction thereof. Landscaping shall be approved through
submission of landscape plans to the Planning Department for
approval. Staff required landscaping of the north and south
property lines in an attempt to meet this standard requirement.
After reevaluation, staff proposes landscaping be relocated from
the south property line to the north building elevation.
3. Trash enclosure relocation. The applicant requests approval to
relocate the refuse enclosure 10 feet to the east of the pre-
viously approved site. The requested location will not inter-
fere with circulation nor parking.
e.ry Oil rH.=aloa
.
o
o
Planning CQRRission
Amendments to Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
April 21, 1987
-2-
4. Southerly driveway closure. As required by the Engineering
Department, the southerly driveway was to be reDOved and
replaced with standard curb and gutter. The applicant requests
this standard requirement be deleted due to an attempt to secure
reciprocal access agreements with the property owner to the
south. This agreement has not been produced. Retaining the
driveway would serve no purpose. A field inspection reveals a
red curb constructed on the property line with the driveway
apron remaining. This creates a hazardous and liable situation
for the City, and a very unsightly condition.
5. Parking lot striping. Staff required restriping in the rear of
the bul1ding to allow circulation, primarl1y for refuse trucks
which will be required to drive the full length of the property'
to reach the refuse enclosure. To enable the large trucks to
continue in forward motion and eliminate backing, deletion of
six parking spaces is necessary.
6. landscaping in the front setback area. In an attempt to improve
the elevation of the existing structure staff required land-
scaping adjacent to the building on the east elevation. This
was to extend to the width of the porch plus the width of a four
foot sidewalk, or nine feet. The existing asphalt abuts the
base of the building creating a stark appearance. Once the ele-
vation is improved with the required planter area, and once the
required ten foot setback from the east property line. area is
landscaped, a 10 foot strip of asphalt would bisect the two
areas. Staff included the 10 foot strip of asphalt to be
removed and replaced in landscaping to create a cohesive
landscape area and an attractive street elevation.
The applicant requests these amendments to avoid additional costs. All con-
ditions imposed are in an effort to upgrade the site, and in most instances to
meet minimum standards as set forth by code. The cost of improve.ents should
not be a consideration as a tradeoff for the aesthetic value of a development.
The applicant has secured a Certificate of Occupancy through a cash deposit
with the City in the amount of Sl,200.oo. The business is in operation.
Disposition of the deposit is pending the action of the Planning Commission.
A field visit of the site reveals signage installed without permits or appro-
val. The sign on the west elevation consists of a large bulls eye target and
spray painted letters which read "Indoor Range", The combined total area does
not appear to meet code, Signage is also installed on the east elevation.
,
o
o
Planning Commission
Amendments to Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
Apri 1 21, 1987
-3-
Based on the facts presented in this memo, staff makes the following reconmen-
dations (See attachments Ai, A2, and A3):
1. Staff recommends maintaining the handicap parking stall adjacent
to the building which would provide the most convenient accessi-
bility for a handicapped individual.
2. Staff recommends modifing this condition to permit the reloca-
tion of the planter area adjacent to the south property line to
the north side of the existing building as indicated in
Attachment "A". All other landscaping to remain and to Include
approved landscape plan.
3. Staff recommends approval of the requested relocation of the
refuse enclosure 10 feet to the east.
4. Staff recommends the original condition not be modified which
required that the driveway be removed and the standard curb and
gutter be installed as required by the City Engineer.
5. Staff recommends parking lot striping as originally reqUired.
6. Staff recommends the front area between the building and pro-
perty line be landscaped as required. The area shall be
included on the landscape plans required to be submitted to the
Planning Department, and all original requirements of the Parks
Department be met. Those conditions Included:
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department Conditions.
7, The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irri-
gation plan for the entire development to the Director of Parks
and Recreation for review and approval. Upon approval, 3 (three)
copies of the final landscape plan shall be submitted to the .
Planning Department. Design shall include, but not be limited
to the following:
1. The landscape plan shall meet the standards and require-
ments set forth by the Department of Parks and Recreation.
2. Street trees shall be planted 35 feet on center spacing.
Varieties and locations shall be determined by the
Department of Parks and Recreation prior to planting (15
gallon minimum, prefer 24 inch box specimens).
o
o
Planning Commission
Amendments to Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
April 21, 1981
-4-
3. Planters shall be enclosed with concrete curbing.
4. Street trees shall be WASHINTONIA ROBUSTA.
Staff further recommends emphasis be placed on the standard requirement which
requires all signs be erected by permit in conformance with the sign code.
Respectfully submitted,
DAVID H. ANDERSON
Acting Planning Director
SAN~~'--
Associate Planner
I
o
. '.
. . . .
...~_..-:......;.........;-
.
o
0,
'.:~;';~I:'H;,;,;\
"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 3OONORTH"D"STREET,SANBERNARDINO.CALlFORNIA \12418
"
.,
'....
EVLYN WilCOX
Mayor
April 24, 1987
Members o' the Common Council
Esther E,tr~.. . . . . . . . . . . . . Firs' W.rd
Jack Reilly.. ... ..... . ., . Second W.rd
Ralph Hernandez. . . . . . . . . . . Third W.rd
St.". Markl . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth W.rd
GOrdon Qul.l . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fifth W.rd
o.n Frilzler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sixth W.rd
Jack Strickler . . . . . . . . . . . .S.".nth W.rd
Mr. Robert L. Fisher
12391 Sampson, Suite 0
Riverside, CA 92503
Dear /1r. Fisher:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on April 21, 1987,
the following action was taken:
The request to modify conditions of approval for previously
approved Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44, which permitted an
indoor shooting range, retail store and training facility on
approximately .69 acre located at 766 South Lugo Street in
the C-M Commercial-Manufacturing zone, was reviewed. The
Commission approved staff's recommendation, as contained in
the memorandum dated April 21, 1987, for modification to
conditions 15 and 17, with no further modifications to
conditions.
Modifications were approved as follows:
5. Refuse enclo~.!.U'e to -P~_!~lQcated 10 f~~t tiL-lM
easlL,p'~,Lti!.H&,pJp!LmaIkecL A-.,Lpnd dat~!L-.AE!j,Ul.l
19J1l..,
7. Pla!lULjH~,L "gj~Q!U!L.!:JL_.ih.e, ~pyt.b__P!QI?jH:tL_line
~bgl1--~--I~cated to t~DQIth s~_-2f the
~2\i~t,in!L_!;H!.H91D9..__P!U _ fJj,t~_,_pJpn_l!Ierk.gsL..J\- 3 and
ilil,ted lmllL2l,.LJ987.
According to the San Bernardino
19.78.070., the following applies
tional use permit:
Munictpal Code, Section
to the filing of a condi-
,;,:'..'J
.. .
o
o
Mr. Robert L.Fisher
. April 14, 1987
Page 2
liThe decision of the Commission shall be final unless appeal-
ed in writing to the Mayor and Common Council, The written
appeal shall be submitted. to the office of the City Clerk
within ten days from the date of the Commission's decision.
The Common Council, after receipt of the appeal, shall
conduct a public hearing and may either approve, modify or
reject the decision of the Planning Commission.-
If no appeal is filed
provisions of the San
of the Commission shall
pursuant to the previously mentioned
Bernardino Municipal Code, the action
be final.
Sincerely,
a~/&~
DAVID ANDERSON
Acting Planning Director
r
mkf
CCI Building and Safety Dept.
Engineering Division
Majestic Realty Co. and
Patrician Assoc., Inc.
3200 Crossroads Park, Suite 400
City of Industry, CA 91746
CITY OF SANtl~RNARDINO
-
Q.EMORANDUM
To Planning Commission
Subject Amendments to Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
From Planning Department
Date April 21, 1987
Approved AgaRd, It.~ NI. l, Ward NI. ]
Date
Owner: Majestic Realty Co., &
Patrician Assoc., Inc.
3200 Crossroads Park, 1400
City of Industry, CA 91746
Applicant: Robert L. Fisher, Sr.
12391 Sampson. Ste. 10
Riverside, CA 92503
Conditional Use Permit No, 86-44, to establish an indoor shooting gallery at
766 South Lugo Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on
November 4, 1986. Said approval was subject to conditions and standard
requirements as attached.
The applicant requests to amend the following conditions (See attached letter):
1.
by a han-
2. Delete the lanter on the north side of the arcel.
an ernar 1no un c pa 0 e ect on . . ..5 requires
landscaping in open parking lots be a minimum of 5% of the paved
area. The landscaping shall include one tree for every ten spa-
ces or fraction thereof. Landscaping shall be approved through
submission of landscape plans to the Planning Department for
approval. Staff required landscaping of the north and south
property lines in an attempt to meet this standard requirement.
After reevaluation, staff proposes landscaping be relocated from
the south property line to the north building elevation.
3. Trash enclosure relocation. The applicant requests approval to
relocate the refuse enclosure 10 feet to the east of the pre-
viously approved site, The requested location will not inter-
fere with circulation nor parking.
c,ry Oil rHI.Oft
" .
.j, <.
0"
,
o
Planning ConIission
Amendments to Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
April 21, 1987
-2-
4. Southerly driveway closure. As required by the Engineering
Department, the southerly driveway was to be removed and
replaced with standard curb and gutter. The applicant requests
this standard requirement be deleted due to an attempt to secure
reciprocal access agreements with the property owner to the
south. This agreement has not been produced. Retaining the
driveway would serve no purpose. A field inspection reveals a
red curb constructed on the property line with the driveway
apron remaining. This creates a hazardous and liable situation
for the City, and a very unsightly condition.
5. Parking lot striping. Staff required restriping in the rear of
the building to allow circulation, primarily for refuse trucks
which will be required to drive the full length of the property.
to reach the refuse enclosure. To enable the large trucks to
continue in forward motion and eliminate backing, deletion of
six parking spaces is necessary.
6, Landscaping in the front setback area. In an attempt to improve
the elevation of the existing structure staff required land-
scaping adjacent to the building on the east elevation. This
was to extend to the width of the porch plus the width ofa four
foot sidewalk, or nine feet. The existing asphalt abuts the
base of the building creating a stark appearance. Once the ele-
vation is improved with the required planter area, and once the
required ten foot setback from the east property line area is
landscaped, a 10 foot strip of asphalt would bisect the two
areas. Staff included the 10 foot strip of asphalt to be
removed and replaced in landscaping to create a cohesive
landscape area and an attractive street elevation.
The applicant requests these amendments to avoid additional costs. All con-
ditions imposed are in an effort to upgrade the site, and in most instances to
meet minimum standards as set forth by code. The cost of improve~nts should
not be a consideration as a tradeoff for the aesthetic value of a development.
The applicant has secured a Certificate of Occupancy through a cash deposit
with the City in the amount of $1,200.00. The business is in operation.
Disposition of the deposit is pending the action of the Planning Commission.
A field visit of the site reveals signage installed without permits or appro-
val. The sign on the west elevation consists of a large bulls eye target and
spray painted letters which read "Indoor Range". The combined total area does
not appear to meet code. Signage is also installed on the east elevation.
.
~ :.
o
o
Planning Commission
Amendments to Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
April 21, 1987
-3-
Based on the facts presented in this memo, staff makes the following reCOMmen-
dations (See attachments A1, A2, and A3):
1. Staff recommends maintaining the handicap parking stall adjacent
to the building which would provide the most convenient accessi-
bility for a handicapped individual.
2. Staff recommends modifing this condition to permit the reloca-
tion of the planter area adjacent to the south property line to
the north side of the existing building as indicated in
Attachment "A". All other landscaping to remain and to include
approved landscape plan.
3. Staff recommends approval of the requested relocation of the
refuse enclosure 10 feet to the east.
4. Staff recommends the original condition not be modified which
required that the driveway be removed and the standard curb and
gutter be installed as required by the City Engineer.
5. Staff recommends parking lot striping as originally required.
6. Staff recommends the front area between the building and pro-
perty line be landscaped as required. The area shall be
included on the landscape plans required to be submitted to the
Planning Department, and all original requirements of the Parks
Department be met, Those conditions included:
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department Conditions.
7. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irri-
gation plan for the entire development to the Director of Parks
and Recreation for review and approval. Upon approval, 3 (three)
copies of the final landscape plan shall be submitted to the '
Planning Department. Design shall include, but not be limited
to the following:
1. The landscape plan shall meet the standards and require-
ments set forth by the Department of Parks and Recreation.
2. Street trees shall be planted 35 feet on center spacing.
Varieties and locations shall be determined by the
Department of Parks and Recreation prior to planting (15
gallon minimum, prefer 24 inch box specimens).
.
." o.
o
o
Planning Commission
Amendments to Conditions of Approval
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44
April 21, 1987
-4-
3. Planters shall be enclosed with concrete curbing,
4. Street trees shall be WASHINTONIA ROBUSTA.
Staff further recommends emphasis be placed on the standard requirement which
requires all signs be erected by permit in conformance with the sign code.
Respectfully submitted,
DAVID H. ANDERSON
Acting Planning Director
~~
SAN
Associate Planner
,
"
oi.
(-
o
January 26, 1987
To: Sandy Paulson
City ~f San Bernardino Pl~nnin~ Dep~rtment
Re:Conditional Use Fermit
No. 86-44
..
:i:
Dear Ms. Pnulson:
-" 'tn is requested thq,t the f'ollowinp: ~onrl i tions be Amended to enable
the applicant to obtain the Certificate of Occul'F1ncy immediFltely.
Attatched is a Cashiecs Check for t1200.00 which represents the
amount required to do the work as required pel'.' attatchment. A or
until the following amendment is approved.
1. Handicapped Parking
The planninf department indicated thAt the hadic~pped parkinr ~t~ll
be located adjacent to the buildin~. That area is where a fence
gate is presently located~ The applicant proposes that the handi-
capped pFlrking be placed in the north side per the new site plan.
This will 8.l10w for easy access for the hRndic"!pped I'ln<i enable the
applicant to utilize the security provided by the fp.ncA. It w~uld
also avoid ~dditional costs to remove FInd relocate the fence.
,,'
2. 3' planter alonl1' north fln1 sOl1th side of fenced ~rei!
'1'he <l-pr1 ic"'nt proposes that only a pl~nter be lcc.')tert em the soutr.
side per the amended site plan. The 3' plf'mter \"cul.I' :1erve n~
purpose :).nel cost the Applic'?nt uncess:;l'ry eX'Pen:;;e. Th'~ nr~;' is
clJrr~ntl:r ,?OrrTplAtely "':"::nt;e'l and the te1~Antfi O~i e~ '7.~;t::i' ~~i!'1t~ ;"t:!.'"~
E~~I.'it.:t~.i' nl:~~uf::::ctur LYJf. :'hiz. ~-::.~~;';;rr.~1l"t3 1" :J:1 ~)el..:':l .~ ~ ;:~... :~Sf.:": ~r:;~
verbally approved with Mr. Anaya of the Parks and Recreation
Department.
3. Trash Enclosure
The trash enclosure shall be in the north east area p-s pre posed
but will be located inward 10' from the east fence areA. This ch~n~e
was made at the owners request to allow for expansion. This chanve
will not 3ffect the parkin~ area as there is already artequate '
parking.
4. Southerly Briveway Closure
The ap~licant is presp.ntly securinp a neclAr~tion of ~eciproc31
U~e Rights for this driveway.
::;.
"
.
,
oc
-2-
r
o
,,'
5. ~odifie1 stripinp for improved circul~tt~n
It is the ::1.[lTllic~ntn' r.ontention that thf! parkin!, ::t.l'lnnper I.ht'
amended site plM are ~rlequate. P.eviserj strippinp per "menriment ,~.
would only increase expense for the a'Pplicant and there is no
need to improve the circulation of traffic.
6. Landscapin~ of entrMce area.
Staff recommends that additional landscapin~ be aone to the
entrance area since it deems that only a 4' si~ewaik is
necessary and that the a.pproximately 13' of pavinF!' ic unusable.
It is the applicants' contention that the sidewalk doe~ not
Deed to be limited to only 4'. 'It is the applicants' contention
tho.t the mir:i:nun: 1(;' ~~Olliren~9n-t "te met :.In:"1 t.l~(-: rr.;~!- .....~.. t:h~
asphalt r€:Il','4in "IS i:3 to :1110':/ .for mor.e c1rcula:!;ion of t"e out!di,le:
area hy the public. The additional landscapinF is only an
additional expense to the applicant and serves no ~Jrpose.
The request for the 8hove amennments is made in gooti f?itl1 1'\v the
applicants to expedite securinf the ~ertificate of Accupancy and
still meet t~e conditions set forth by the planning department.
We believe that mMY of the conditions are the res'Ponnibllity of
the landlord, however, we do have a sif'Tled le~se ob1.iF~tinF!' us tC'
perform once the Conditional Use Permit is approven. ~s you are
aware we were not able to ottain a Condition81 Use .Fcrmit without
a signed lease. Therefore, we find ourselves in n ~:ntch=:>2
si tuation unless we 'lXe a.llowed to open our business and begin
generating some income.
C:~.dill~ '"
~ .~
Robert T... Fis her
7J~ J. ~,
w~tI ]'isher
;:
~
-..
.
.. ",
o
o
.."...........,
/'~\ ~!"!'~";,..,
/ ":..."~ :, .~. . _f~' .\..
CIT~,.;~~!SA. ,".~,~~ERN ARDIN 0 30lI NOIlTH "0" STIlEET. SAN .IlNAIIOlNO, CALlFOfINIA 82411
~"H:" I\" "'/
Ol-~';' : ,"_. \ ,"
......\~~!(.i 1.\ ,"
EVLYN WILCOX
Moyor
Member. or the Common Coundl
E'tt'llf E,lrR'. . . . . . . . . . . . . Flr.t Ward
Jack RtlUy. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..econdW....
Aalph Hern.nnl . . . . . . . . . . . Third WitCl
..,..Mark.. ......... .. . P'ourthW.,d
QordonQulel............. FUU.Ward
Dan "...., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51.t.. W...d
Jack Strlckl., . . . . . . . . . . . .Sevlfttlt Wetd
November 10, 1986
Mr. Robert L. Fisher
12391 Bampson, Suite 0
Riverside, CA 92503
Dear Mr. Fisherl
At .the meeting of the Planning Commission on November 5,
1986, the following action was takenl
The application for Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44, to
permit an indoor shooting range, retail store and training
facility on approximately .69 acre located at 766 South Lugo
street in the C-M Commercial-Manufacturing zone, was approved
based upon findings of fact contained in the staff report
dated November 4, 1986 and subject to the conditions and
standard requirements listed therein.
According to the San Bernardino
19.78.070., the following applies
tional use permitl
"The decision of the Commission shall be final unless appeal-
ed in writing to the Mayor and' Common Council. The written
appeal shall be submitted to the office of the City Clerk
within ten days from the date of the Commission's decision.
The Common Council, after receipt of the appeal, shall
conduct a public hearing and may either approve, modify or
reject the decision of the Planning Co.-ission."
Municipal Code, Section
to the filing of a condl-
.
;.
..dI"II'"' ".
.~""" ~~~.' ,"
-, dr'"
,-' ,I
",
l
'I" ,';
.
.
o
Mr. Robert L. Fisher
November 10, 1986
Page 2
0-,
If no appeal is filed pursuant
provisions of the San Bernardino
of the Commission shall be final.
to the previously mentioned
Municipal Code, the action
Respectfully,
~,~
FRANK A. SCHUMA
Planning Director
mkf
CCI Building and Safety Dept.
Engineering Division
Majestic Realty Co. and
Patrician Assoc., Inc.
3200 Crossroads Park, Suite 400
City of Industry, CA 91746
. . :).
o
o
CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM 3
HEARING DATE _11/4/66_
WA I
APPLICANT:
o ert . s er, r.
12391 Sampson, Ste,', #0
Riverside CA 92503
Ra)estic Realty Co" &
Patrician Assoc, , Inc.
3200 Crossroads Pk., #400
1&1
B
Conditional Use Permit
No. 86-44
OWNER:
6
I
a:
....
~
i
Applicant requests to establish an indoor shooting range, retail
store, and training facility in the C-M, Commercial Manufacturing
zone, in an existing building.
The subject site is located at 766 South Lugo Street,
PROPERTY
Subject
North
South
East
West
EXISTING
LAND USE
Vacant Ind, Bldng,
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
lndustrial & Flood
Control Channel
GErERAL PLAN
DESI.TION
General Industrial
General Industrial
General Industrial
General Industrial
ZONING
M-l
M-l
M-l
M-l
M-l & 0
General Industrial.
GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC fLOOO HAZARD DyES OZONE A (SEWERS IX) YES )
HAZARD ZONE ZONE I! NO OZONE B 0110
HIGH fiRE mYES AIRPORT NOISE I Il!JYES REDEVELOPMENT DYES
HAZARD ZONE DNO CRASH ZONI DNO PItO~ECT MEA Cho
~ o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z iii APPROVAL
APPLICABLE EFflCTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - iii
Z(I) MEASURES NO E,I,R, tc CONDITIONS
I&ICI) o EXEMPT o E.I,R, REQUIRED BUT NO Ita 0 DENIAL
2z i!1
Z- SIGNifiCANT EFfECTS
oa WITH MITIGATING 0 CONTINUANCE TO
ct:Z MEASURES (1)2
-- 0
~....
Z 121 NO o SIGNifiCANT EFfECTS ~
1&1 SIGNifiCANT SEE ATTACHED I, R. C,
EFfECTS MINUTES a:
Il!IV,IMI IIVII.. oIU~ ....
'KY
.
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP NO. 86-44
o
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM '\
HEARING DATE -UL41116_
PAGE "
1. The applicant requests approval of a conditional use
permit under authority of San Bernardino Municipal Code
Section 19.78.020 (20) to establish an indoor shooting
range with an incidental retail shop and a classroom for
education and training, in the C-M, Commercial
Manufacturing zone. The subject site is located on the
west side of Lugo Street, north of Central Avenue at 766
South Lugo Street.
At the site exists a concrete tilt-up building, 80 x
100, or 8,000 square feet. Of the total area, the usage
break down will be as follows: 6,000 square foot
shooting gallery range, and targets, 875 square foot
retail sales, and 625 square foot classroom.
2.
3.
Surrounding land use and
following: north, south,
buildings and warehouses
Manufacturing; west is vacant
control channel.
zoning consist of the
and east are industrial
zoned C-M, Commercial
land zoned C-M and a flood
4.
The proposed facility is best suited within an
industrial area, as proposed, given the potential for
noise, safety and general method of operation.
In the absence of a specific code reference to the
proposed use, parking requirements were calculated to be
34 spaces, based on the following ratios:
1 space for each shooters' booth
1 space for each 250 square feet retail GFA
10 spaces for the classroom
Total
= 20
= 4
= 10
= 34
.
The applicant based the required parking at total retail
of 1 space per 250 square feet GPA which yield.ed 32
required spaces. The site plan shows 49 spaces provided
at the north side of the building.
5. The site plan indicates two driveways onto the property.
The northerly driveway is proposed to be narrowed from
50 feet in width to 26 feet in width. The southerly
driveway shows no proposed changes. A condition is
attached requiring the southerly driveway be clOsed and
the area between the building and the street be
landscaped except where traversed by sidewalks. The
minimum landscape requirement in the C-M zone is 10 feet
from property line. However, to landscape a ten foot
. .., .' .~'.
o
0,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP NO. 86-44
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM ' 3
HEARING DATE -1JJ.!!/G6
PAG
strip and provide a 4 foot sidewalk would leave approxi-
mately 13 feet of unusable paving. Staff recommends
landscaping as opposed to asphalt in this area. (See
exhibit A)
6. The subject site is located in the AD V, Airport
district five. The district is defined as an area
characteristic of high noise levels. San Bernardino
Municipal Code Section 19.64.110 Airport Flight Zone
requires an interior noise level reduction of twenty
decibels. This requirement would apply to the retail
area, the classroom and the office area and not to the
range. A condition is attached reflecting said require-
ments.
.
7. The range area will be required to reduce noise levels
to within 56 decibels from interior to exterior so as
not to impact adjoining land uses. The Building and
Safety Department will require sound attenuation
measures be attached and shown on all construction plans
submitted. A condition is attached regarding this
Building and Safety requirement'.
The City police Department was consulted on the
operation and safety of the proposed facility and
concluded that the following criteria should be
incorporated into the design of the facility:
8.
a. The smoke generated by the repeated firing of
weapons indoors shall be cleared from the range
through fans mounted along the side walls of the
facility.
b. Stray bullets shall be deflected to the target area
by baffles on the ceiling, Said deflector shields
to be mounted the full length of the ceiling from
the shooters' booths to the target area at an angle
of 45 degrees.
c.
A range
shall be
facility
master
on the
is open.
to assist and monitor activities
range at all times that the
d. No high powered ammunition will be allowed in the
facility.
9. The applicant has indicated that the shooting range will
.. : I .... ".
c
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARD1NO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE r.1IP Nn Rf.,-t.t.
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM ' 3
HEARING DATE -1!(I.{~~,"-
PAGE I.
r
be sound proofed between the range frame, the retail
store office, and the classroom.
10. A similar facility, owned and operated by the applicant,
exists in the City of Riverside. The Riverside Planning
Department and Police Department monitored the facility
for a one-year period. After the year expired, it was
determined that no adverse effects such as increase in
exterior noise levels, crime, safety concerns, parking
or traffic congestion had occurred due to the facility.
11. At present time, the only shooting range in the City of
San Bernardino is at Perris Hill Park. Police Depart-
ment reports no problems due to the existence of that
facility.
12. No refuse enclosure was noted on the site plan. It is
recommended that a refuse enclosure be located to the
rear of the lot and the parking stripes be modified to
allow for improved on-site circulation. (See attachment
A) A condition is included to reflect said
modification.
13.
At their regularly scheduled meeting of
the Environmental Review Committee
negative declaration be issued for
Permit No. 86-44.
October 2, 1986,
recommended a
Conditional Use
.
.
o
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP NO. 86-44
FINDINGS of FACT
AGENDA ITEM ~7.'"'7irr
HEARING DATE~~
PAGE .,
1. The proposed use conforms to
General Plan, which shows this area to
been determined tbat this proposed
industrial areas.
the objectives of
be industrial. It
use best suits
the
has
the
2. The proposed use,
not adversely affect
area.
if constructed as conditioned, should
adjoining uses or development in the.
3. The size
adequate size
detrimental
welfare.
and area of the site are fully developed and of
to accommodate the use in a manner which is not
to the safety, peace, health and general
4. Traffic generated by the use, which has been determined
to be low intensity, will not pose an undue burden on the
streets, and parking is ample and adequate.
5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44 will
not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety or general
welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the observations and findings of fact contained
herein and subject to the conditions and standard
requirements attached hereto, Staff recommends approval of
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-44 and adoption of the
recommended negative declaration.
Respectfully Submitted,
FRANK A. SCRUMA,
Planning Director
.
0,
CITY OF SAN Bl:ANARDINO PLANNINt2 DEPARTMENT
. CASE ('Ill> NO Sg 'I~I
.CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM . 3
HEARING DATE ll/4l3L
P E
1. The classroom, retail space and office area shall comply
with the requirements of San Bernardino Municipal Code
'Section 19.64.110 relative to reduction of interior
noise levels with1n the Airport District v.
2. The range area shall be required to comply with the
recommended conditions of Building and Safety Department
which include:
1. Protection of exterior and interior walls from
projectiles must be shown on plans.
2. Sound attenuation of interior and exterior walls
not to exceed 56 decibels.
3. All concerns of the Police Department shall be addressed
as follows:
1. Fans shall be installed along the side walls to
facilitate ventilation.
2. Deflector shield shall be installed at a 45 degree
angle on the ceiling from the firing area to the
target area.
3. A range master shall be present in the gallery area
during all hours of operation.
4. No h1gh powered ammunition shall be fired at the
facility.
4. The front setback shall be redesigned as shown in
attachment A.
Modif ed----~.---^-~~~-eneros~L~-~h~rr~-roeatecr-rrr--rhe-rear-"t_rrre
4/21/ 7 btti-.!:ding' --~ -~ -- :ro=t:-i-otT -app['"C7V'ecr- -by-_rrre -"'?ramrrrrq-srrd'
Re-ftt_-frep~L"tmelob... Refuse enclosure to be relocated 10
feet to the east, per site ~lan marked A-3 and dated Apri121, 1987.
6. A new site plan shall be subm:..tted showing required
alterations prior to issuance of bU11ding permits.
Parks. Recreation
Conditions
and
.QQlllIDill1 i t y
Serv1ces
Department
7.
The developer is to
and irrigation plan
Director of Parks
.
submit a complete master landscape
for the entire development to the
and Recreation for review' and
\..
..
A. ....
o 0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. CASE CUP NO. 86-44
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM ~
HEARING DATE .-JltAlt6
PAG
~
approval. Upon approval, 3 (three) coples
landscape plan shall be submitted to
Department, Design shall include, but not
the following:
of the hna.L
the Planning
be .Limited to
1.
2.
Added -----------5.
r 4/21/ 7
\..
The landscape plan shall meet
requirements set forth by the
and Recreation.
the standards and
Department of Parks
3.
4.
Street trees shall be planted 35 feet on center
spacing. Varieties and locations shall be
determined by the Department of Parks and
Recreation prior to planting (15 gallon minimum,
prefe.- 24 inch box specimens).
Planters shall be enclosed with concrete curbinq.
street Trees shall be Washintonia Robusta.
Planter area adjacent to the south proper tv line
shall be relocated to the north s1de of the exist-
ing building, per site pl~n marked A-3 and dated
April 21, 1987.
.
.". :;; ;,-.
o
o
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE CUP NO. 86-44
""
""
-'
AGENDA ITEM __. 3 . _....
HEARING DATE .l.l/4~C.6 .' '.
PAGE'
~,
"'l
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL
.-l.. CUP NO. 86-44 shall be in effect for a period of 12 IIOnths
from the date of approval. However, if no development has been initiated at
the end of the 12-month period, the application shall expire. Additional
time may be approved upon request of the applicant prior to expiration of
the 12-month period. Expiration Date: November 5. 1986.
~ PARKING:
a. This developlllent shall be required to maintain a m1niRlUII of 34 stan-
dard off-street parking spaces.
b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two 'nches of AC
over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer.
Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least
three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway.
c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley
from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in
height shall be erected and maintained along the property llneso as to
separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned pro-
perty provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located
within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front
or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in
height when located within ten feet of the street line.
d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from
property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equiva-
lent landscape berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected
and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the
street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential
area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure the
required front setback landscaping.
REFUSE ENCLOSURES:
3
Whenever refuse bins are located within or adjacent to a parking area used
by the public, they shall be enclosed by a decorative wall six feet in
height along the rear and sides and screened gate(s) six feet in height
along the front. The enclosure shall not be placed within the required
front or street side yard setback area. Exact location and size of refuse
enclosures are to be determined by the Planning Department and Division of
Public Services Superintendent. '
""
......
~
M.'PU ..
, ,.., ~".
o
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
...,
I.
CASE CUP NO. 86-44
AGENDA ITEM 3.
HEARING DATE':" u/4Tf;O
PAGE !I
~
...,
WALLS:
a. Six-foot high solid decorative walls shall be required on the north
,south . east ,and west or peripheral property
Trnes. (Onry-those marked with .xu-or check mark appTY7>
b. Chain-link fencing may be used, subject to approval by the Planning
Department.
4
LAtlDSCAPING:
.
The intent and purpose of this section is to prevent trees and other
landscaping from damaging public improvements.
a. Street trees must be installed at annnimum of 30 feet on center.
Varieties and exact location shall be deternnned by the Director of
Park and Recreation.
b, All required setbacks abutting a public right-of-way shall be
landscaped (except for wal~s and driveways which bisect or encroach
upon the required landscape area).
c. Three copies of a landscape plan (including plant material
specifications) shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Park
and Recreation Department for review and approval.
d. All required landscaping shall be protected from parking areas and
shall be provided with automatic sprinkler facilities which shall be
maintained in an operative condition.
e. Interior planting shall be required and maintained equal to at least
five percent of the open surfaced parking area excluding the area of
landscaping strip required by subsection .bU and shall include at least
one tree for every five spaces or major fraction thereof. Measurements
shall be computed from the inside of perimeter walls or setback lines.
f. The requi red setback( s) from the north, south . east X ,
west property line shall be densely landscaped with mature trees.
shrubs, and groundcover. A -foot landscaped earthen berm shall be
erected and maintained within the setback along the above indicated
property 11 ne.
1 LLUMI NA 11 ON:
5
a. All lighting fixtures in the parking areas shall be directed away frOll
adjacent properties and the public right-of-way,
.....
~
:
.
o
o
r- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
\..
CASE CUP NO 8(l-44
.
AGENDA ITEM 3
HEARING ~~11 /I'~
~
---6... MEDlANI CAL EQUI PMENT :
a. Air conditioning and vent ducts shall be directed away from any adja-
cent residential uses.
b. All mechanical equipment located on the roof shall be screened and
located away from adjoining residential uses. Screening design shall
be approved by the Planning Department,
Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required
(If applicable).
Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer
in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation.
During construction, the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a
portion of the periphery of the site to minimize wind and debris damage to
adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City
Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust
control.
Within 75 feet of any Single-family residential district, the maxi.um
height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20 feet unless the
Commission determines that due to unusual topographical or other features.
such restrictive height is not practical.
All utility lines shall be installed underground subject to exceptions
approved by the Planning Department and the City Engineer.
~ No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these
Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino
Muni cipal Code.
--8. SIGNS:
All signs shall be in conformance with San Bernardino Municipal Code
Section 19.60. Three copies of a plot plan and elevation of the sign drawn
to scale shall be submitted to the Planning Department for revieW and
approval prior to issuance of the sign permit from the Building and Safety
Department.
a. Monument-type signs shall not be located within the required setback
for the zoning district in which the sign is located. The monument
sign shall be located a minimum of 5 feet from the property line. If
the monument sign is located within the setback, it shall not exceed
an overall height of 3 feet.
b. All freestanding signs must have 8 feet of clearance between average
ground level and the bottom of the si gn.
Milt
,
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE CUP NO. 86-44
AGENDA ITEM . 3
HEARING ~~ n/t{:;6-
'"
U&IIEEIII& DIVISlOI
Project Description: C.U.P. 186-44 Indoor
shooting range at 766 South lUgo Street
Oa te : lU-~tI-tsb
Prepared By: ~
Page 1 Of
Reviewed By: ~~
3 pages ·
.
Owner/Appl icant: Robert Fisher
"
NOTE TO APPLlCAlT: II here separa te
Engheering plans are required. the
applicant is responsible for
subllitting the Engineering plans
directly to the Engineering Dhhioil.
They .ay be subMitted prior to
subll1ttal of Building Plans.
STAIDARD REQUIREMENTS
9. Payment of all applicable Engineering fees. Contact Engineering
Division for schedule of fees.
10. Submittal of a grading/drainage plan conforming to all require-
...nts of Title 15 of the Municipal Code. including sUbMUtal of
a satisfactory soils investigation containing recoMMendaUons
for grad1ng, prior to issuance of a grading or build1llg per-
mit,
11. All dra1nage frOM the developAlent shall be directed to an
approved public dra1nage facility. If not feasible, proper
drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the
sati sfaction of the Ci ty Engineer.
12. Design and construction of all public utilities to serve the
si te in accordance wi th Ci ty Code, Ci ty Standards and require-
ments of the serving utility.
...
..j
.
.
CITY
o
OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE CUP NO. ~fi-44
STANDARD
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
3
11/4/8.6-
.1.~
"
1IIJIlJJ1N' DIYISION
Projec t Descri pti on: C.U. P. 186~44 ..~
shooting range at 766 South Lu!lO Strellt
r ,
Da te : \r12818~
Prepared y: G
Page 2 0
Reviewed BY:~RK
3 pages
13. Design and construction of all required public h1proveaents to
con fora to the u1ti ma te planned cross sec t1 on (such as street
widening. curb and gutter, sidewalk. street lights. h'lndicap
ramps. and others) in accordance with the Municipal Code, City
Standards and the requirements of the City Engineer,
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Grading:
14. The site/plot/grading and drainage plan submitted 'for a
building permit shall contain sufficient ground elevations
(both existing and proposed), building pad and finished floor
elevations, grade slopes. and gradients to define the aMount of
grading to be done (if any) and the lIeans of draining the site,
Uttl ities:
.
15, All existing overhead service lateral to the site shall be
relocated underground,
Street Improvements:
16. a) Existing driveway approaches which are not part of the
approved plan shall be removed and replaced with full-
height curb. gutter and sidewalk per City Standards.
17. b) New driveway approaches shall be constructed per Standard
No. 204.
18. c) Construct 6"-wide sidewalk adjacent to curb per City
Standard No. 202. '.
'"
~
,
.
CITY
o
SAN BERNARDINO
o
,
""'IIi
OF
CASE
~n'P Nn Rf.._h..b
STANDARD
REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM 3
HEARING DATE. '11/4/36,
PAGE . 1]
...
~
1!i1!IER1K' DIVISIOK
"
Project Descri pti on: C.y.P. ~86"4~ Ip90Qr
~hoot;na ranae at 766 South LuQO Street
.e........... Da te: ~6
Prepared By:~ ev ewed By: GRK
Page 3 ~3 pages
~
19. d) Reciprocal use rights for the COAlIIOn driveway at the
Southeast corner shall be established, or the driveways
shall be reconstructed to provide m1n1Alum width of 24' each
with minimum 2' of full curb between property line and top
of x. ~
20~ Requjred Engineering Permits:
a) Construction permit for on-site improve.ents (except
building - see Building and Safety).
b) Construction permit for off-site improvements.
21' Applicable Engineering Fees:
a) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site hprovement
(except building - see Building and Safety).
bl Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements.
... ~
.... Uy
. it~, '., '.'1. Iii
11' .. :..-.
,:J . ~.
-. ... ... .-e,
..;:.. 'f. t~
:. .......:.
.".!" -: I..
. i:?~, . r l'
.r _ .... -\:._
~.f" Uo.tr4 ~.
.: ~: ,!,
~~
... ..'"
..t
.... .....~.:
. -
,
,
, .
.
. .
~ "
,. .
. .
. .~.
~n"n i.
~".!1! t: ,
!~:ain 1': -
~~f' ~ ,- '.
.. ';'f;Jt 1,8
-. ~l ---
, t.
, ..1;...1-
19' '
. - f' .c. .
. z. .....
-. - ".
,..:-.
i'"
,
o
-
f
.
.
--
&
-..
~c
i.i
'..~
- y-
.E
t
: III ':
'-~
it_\
"
~
,"
,j j
. .
i.
'0'
0,
1 r.
~
.
o \ '....... I
.. ~. ..'
'J ..' .
"! ~. ..
I . __ "-.
. .
....
t Mo~i "ed
= S+.....,p;n.j .
~ -For' ..
i l....pro'VeJ.
c., rc.L4, I...L' ,
~"ol'\. .
. ' .
'...'. ~....'.,' ,:1:,- ,.~
.,;....... . ""-.,, ..:
. .... '.,J .
A'frsKO l/Eb
-~ elf WJ~ -,Vi: ,..sUE;.
N ::"",
~... ,,-. ~
. . -'l .. :-
.
( . p;
. t'
r
"'4s.~ f I
. ~c:losl1~
....
-4
"-
'.
.- -
.. --
.. '"
.
"'-")..
: f
./f 0
.. .
.. t
~
~ .. j.
.' .:
@)~ .
~ :
,
i- ..
~
/
, ,. ~-
-
. .'
H
.
..
.
-,
T
'~
..
..
~
.
I
~t
.
..
.
.
.
.
.,
, .
~rrE ~LAN
Af:l:A.dc:m e n-t
A-I
f" ...
-'" ..
-
. ' >
. "IP -.' "'1'1 :
.' . I
'. ... '~:
:..1 .:,
_0 ;~. ~
" 0 I ~
..:~-:-: I J
, ~,=,', 0 r k-
.Y ~~ It -\;..-
.;.r If- i"
'.. ~: ,"
..~ -
.' ..'
.. ~ ;"
. _.. .
. .
.
. .
.. ..
.'.
o 0
'-'~':
i Rilt' ~
, .. .-il I'
!;:in \'.
:!if' ~ ;-
.';'f~t 1,8
-. fl -.-
, . "
. .,l".i
'-If" .c.
o %. ~ ~
.- ....
..
,.~,
..
i'-
o
r, ......: I
,,~. ..'
:1 :-: '.
~ .. -- .....
.:
, JIr--
.{,~. .. t
-
: ',J
': -'0 . ~
- -.
. . -. .
...'
...
, t MoA. ;ed
:= S+......f;~j .
"t efo r ,.
r i..... p r o'V eJ.
f c..'r~L\ 1",,-41on. :
,;
.,
, ('1)
\9-; 1'1IT;4+I-
-l.. 'I/f
.~
&.AN)S(N"
SIfJ)-'CIt " -r, '
- . ..... ........
. . :~
( . R;
1 .
r
i.-
.-
. -4-
-
'_'?l.
H
,. .
.
,
T
.
~
L...:-
..
..
..
~
....
"
...
.
..
.
.
i
:.......
. .
, it_~ AME"1JbMENTS
~ -1!:
. :' of L.&J~
,I I
I, N. ."
'0 ... '. '
'o_~ ~
I '
,
-is 'REI(UESTQ By '-'f'fuctfrlJ7.
...Vi:r-JU~ AitAeAWlen-t . -A~Z
...... -.., ~
..... :u"
.. . ~
i r-
...
-'.
-
.' '. ..
'~"" ~. ....~.. . ,.."--
o
o
AGENDA
ITEM#:
CITY OF SAN BERNAR[)t.jO
PLAtftNG DEPARTMENT
LOCATION
CASE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
86-44
HEARING DATE 11/1./llL
3
11-2
II-I
[''''''/ /
w)
,"=800'
C-II
~
~~ :: ,
11-\
C-II
II-I
C-II
C'II 11'\
II-I
M-I
M-I
AI".
..
11-2
II-I
ILL
C-II
.'0"
C-II
11'1
11-2
C.II C,II
.0. .0.
. C-II
.0. .:'0" t.1I
,CiI
1
., '0.
.(/' 11-1 CoM
II-I .0. II-I M.I II-I II-I C-II