HomeMy WebLinkAbout21-City Manager
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Lori Sassoon, Assistant City
Manager
Subject: Set a public hearing for
Monday, April 6, 2009, at 4:00 p.m. in
the City Hall Council Chambers to
discuss the adjustment of various user
fees and the establishment of new user
fees.
Dept: City Manager's Office
Date: March 11, 2009
Meeting Date:
March 16, 2009
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
March 4 & March 11, 2009 - Reviewed by Ways and Means Committee and
recommended for approval
Recommended motion:
That a public hearing be set for Monday, April 6, 2009 at 4:00 pm in the City Hall
Council Chambers to discuss the adjustment and establishment of various user fees.
.j;v ~b- Lrl-s
Sig6a'ture
Contact person: Lori Sassoon
Phone: 384-5122
Supporting data attached: Staff report & worksheets
Ward: All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Net additional revenue of approx. $770,000 in
FY 09-10
Source: (Acct. No.) Various
(Acct. Description) General Fund
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item
.::tt (f I
03~/Co~cP1
STAFF REPORT
Subiect:
Set a public hearing for Monday, April 6, 2009, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers to
discuss the adjustment of various user fees and the establishment of new user fees.
Backt!:round:
Fees for service, otherwise called user fees, are calculated by determining the actual cost of the
services being provided. Since the late 1990's, the Mayor and Common Council has approved
numerous comprehensive user fee updates, usually in the spring of each year. The last of such updates
were approved in May and June of2008.
As part of the City's budget reduction measures to close the projected budget deficit, each department
was asked to re-evaluate fees and look into the possibility of new fees. The result of the department's
analysis is approximately $770,000 in additional revenue for FY 09-10. The majority of the proposed
fees were included as part of the budget discussions during the budget meetings on February 2 and
February 17, 2009. Departments submitting new and increased fees for analysis by the Ways and
Means Committee meeting include Animal Control, City Clerk, Code Enforcement, Development
Services, Facilities, Fire, Public Services, and Police.
Attachment A contains a summary of fees to be considered for establishment and/or revision at this
time. For each new and revised fee included in Attachment A, departments have completed cost
analysis worksheets with information regarding each service for which a fee is charged, including the
classifications of any employees involved, the amount of staff time involved in providing the service,
and other related costs for materials, supplies, equipment, utilities, etc. Information regarding hourly
salary and benefit rates is also included in the worksheets. Generally, each department's recommended
fees are based on this service cost; certain charges, such as fmes, are not required to be based on the
cost of service. Staff has also gathered information concerning comparable fees in neighboring
jurisdictions, and that information is included on the worksheets.
Key changes to the fee schedule include the following:
. Animal Control is proposing to increase fees related to the boarding and apprehension of
animals. Many of these fees have not been updated for several years. The proposed fees would
eliminate the two tier apprehension fee for altered and unaltered pets. The new fees would set a
single fee of$IOO for the first apprehension, $200 for the second apprehension, and $350 for
the third and subsequent apprehensions.
. Fee Adjustments for Animal Control would also eliminate a two tiered adoption fee for dogs
and cats ($25) versus puppies and kittens ($40) by establishing a single fee of $30. The change
in fee structure will not result in the loss of money for Animal Control.
. Code Enforcement is proposing two fee increases related to weed abatement. One fee is for
staff time for inspection of the vacant lots, notices, billing and coordination of the contractors
for the actual abatement. The other fee is for staff time involved in lien process, when
applicable, and includes the hearing with the Hearing Officer and the BBC. Neither of these
fees has been increased since 1996. Not only has the volume of work increased since that time,
3/12/2009
I
but staff costs have also increased. Total estimated revenue from the fee changes is
approximately $196,000.
. Code Enforcement has also proposed to update administrative fees for costs incurred on
abatements of private property, buildings, abandoned vehicles and weeds. The seven fees on
the resolution were consolidated into four fees, with an estimated revenue increase of
approximately $180,000. The majority of the proposed increase is attributed to the
consolidation of the administrative fees associated with the creation of a demand letters and for
each line item on the demand letter. Updating these fees would bring the combined fee to $65
for the creation of a demand letter.
. Development Services has proposed a nwnber of new fees to recoup personnel costs for
multiple plan re-checks, revisions to approved plans, and citizen requested stop signs and red
curbs. The proposed fees include the creation of a combo permit, which combines the
excavation ($45) and lane closure ($45) permits that contractors typically request at the same
time; the cost of the combined permit would be $55. The new combo permit would allow the
contractors to pull one permit, creating efficiencies for both the City and the contractor.
Development Services staff estimates there is a proposed revenue loss of $10,900, which will
be offset by gains in efficiency.
. Development Services is requesting the addition of a NPDES inspection fee to offset the costs
of the City's NPDES inspection program. Once an inspection is completed, the costs of the
inspection will be added to the following year's business registration renewal. This process
will ensure the City will only collect fees on inspections that are actually completed, and will
reduce the General Fund's net cost for these federally-mandated reviews.
. The Facilities Department is proposing to increase all parking fees by $5 to comply with SB
1407, which has increased the State Courthouse Construction Penalty from $1.50 to $4.50 per
citation. Increasing the parking penalty covers the state penalty increase and collection costs as
allowed by CVC Section 40200.4(f). Estimated total revenue increase, net of the Courthouse
Construction Penalty increase which benefits the state, is $30,000.
. The Police Department is proposing to increase the fees charged for non-permitted false
robberylburglary alarms. Also included are increases to the tow release fee and various photo,
tape and video reproduction fees.
. The Fire Department proposes to reduce its apartment inspection fees by 5% for compliant
property owners that have met two criteria: 1) All fire code violations noted during the initial
inspection must be corrected when the first re-inspection is conducted; and 2) payment of the
first invoice that is sent to the property owner must be postmarked by the due date indicated on
the invoice. Several Councilmembers had previously expressed an interest in establishing such
an incentive program. Estimated revenue loss for a 5% reduction will equal $28,840. However,
Fire expects to generate revenue in excess of FY 08-09 budgeted amounts to offset this
reduction.
Proposed new and amended ordinances are typically reviewed by the Legislative Review Committee
before being recommended to the Mayor and Council for approval. However, two new fees brought
before the Committee will require enabling ordinances, so those ordinances were presented to the
Ways and Means Committee:
3/12/2009
2
. Code Enforcement is proposing a new fee for the removal of unauthorized signs. The fee will
require an ordinance adding Section 16.18, Unauthorized Signs, to the City's Municipal Code.
The new ordinance will define the responsible party as the owner or lessee of property used for
the illegally advertised activity or event. The ordinance will also provide a defmition for an
unauthorized sign and will designate the Code Enforcement Department as the responsible
party for the enforcement of the unauthorized signs. Most importantly, the new ordinance
would allow for the infraction amount to be set by the Master Fee Resolution based on the cost
to the City for administering the program.
Code Enforcement does not suggest repealing Section 8.15.130, Posting Notices Prohibited.
This is essentially an anti-littering ordinance which can be used if someone is actually caught in
the act of placing illegal signs. See Attachment B for a copy of the proposed ordinance.
. Code Enforcement and the City Clerk's Office have worked together to propose a new yard
sale permit fee that will provide better regulation of yard sales. Currently, the City allows for
two yard sales each year, but does not have a system to track the number held each year at a
given property. An ordinance amendment would allow for the yard sales to be tracked in the
City Clerk's Office through a permit process, and enforced by Code Enforcement through the
issuance of administrative citations pursuant to Chapter 9.92 of the City's Municipal Code.
The yard sale permit fee would take affect 90 days from the effective date of the ordinance.
See Attachment C for a copy of the proposed ordinance.
Wavs and Means Committee Review:
On March 4 and II, the Ways and Means Committee reviewed the proposed fee adjustments and new
fees. Based on the Committee's feedback, the following modifications have been made to staff's
original proposal:
. Investigation fees for requested stop signs, no parking signs and permit parking signs have been
removed.
. The new yard sale permit fee will take effect ninety (90) days after the enactment of the
enabling ordinance.
. New Development Services fees for more than 3 plan checks and more then 3 WQMP reviews
will only be assessed upon the authorization of the Director or Deputy Director of Development
Services.
Next Steos
Staff recommends the following timeline for implementation of the new fee schedule. It is
recommended that the Mayor and Council act quickly so as to maximize the additional revenue to be
realized as a result of these changes:
Apri/6 - Public Hearing and first reading of two (2) new enabling ordinances. At the conclusion of the
public hearing, the Mayor and Common Council may adopt the fee resolution. Most fees become
effective upon adoption of the resolution.
June 6 - Development fees will become effective
3/12/2009
3
Financial Imnact:
The new and adjusted fees are projected to provide $770,000 in estimated additional annual revenue in
FY 2009-10.
Recommendation:
Set a public hearing for Monday, April 6, 2009, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers to
discuss the adjustment of various user fees and the establishment of new user fees.
3/12/2009
4
<(
-
..
..
E
....
"
co
-
-
<(
o
oc. 1U:5
S=.::I0
III Q ::I = "1:1"
.!;5 1:1 ~
-=~.:!cu
ro1~ ~....
'"
-.....
-co t'j 0
....- e N
.. i:-
~~a
'"
-
..
..
e
e
..
u
0-;;
g e
:: :5
e
....
.....go
rI.l=""';~
co.. '"
f.. N
...... -
..~
"O~~EAEA
00
00
viM
'" '0
10\0':
o-
N _
EAEA~~
0000
e ~o~~
e~~d~lIi
B ~ ~
,::!
EAEAEA~
-
..
f ..
.. ..
"r:>.
U
0000
oOOC!
..,..;viviM
-!::!.-
EAEA4009fA
.....!'i:'~'Il:t'__
w.l._OOO'lo\
~~~~~~~
o
o
o.
-
..
<ll
"
.9
'"
=
..
-ii
..
c..
g.
..
.!l
-
o
~
,.g
-
'"
~
=
:~
~
tag
.5 o.
='"
's N
....
o
o
o
o
-
00
'" 0
r...:ci
'0
....
........
'0
o
.;
""
-
N ..
..,. '"
r'...o
N'O
-
....
........
o
o
o
'"
-
00
00
dd
NO
-
....
........
o
o
o
'"
....
00
"'0
NO
- ..,.
........
'"
o
o
N
'" ..,.
00
00
NN
I~ ~
.5 Z '
~J~ g
d) s:: -5 ~ ...n
... .. .. i:!1
.!l ]d!i~ 5 ~
i:! ...;:: > 1;1 0 .~ .0_'" 0
t""""u2.:a'Q...... Q.)
cu~-cQ)c.2 ..s:::::oa::lg
cuQ)O(!)~~ e~~~
~~~~-a Q.. 8c
Q.) d) -~ UJ ..."......,..9' a ~ 0
.~.~ g 3 E-- S ........c 0,) ';)
...:1...:1 Cl) ~~.::: ~f-l.:: 15
"o"og,~....~o........:l..c
e e c' c o~ "i ~ ~ ~" e
(!)Q):=:O ._~G)~Q.
.::: J:: 11).~ :;...... ~ Q.,
<<O....lO.........lO....l<
.fl
os
"Cl
Co
;:l
..
..
roo.
..
..
'"
;:l
1
'"
~
Co
e
~
..
00'00
~..~~~~
_0000
-uuuu
"a'ii'ii'ii
.5.5.5.5
= = c c
<<<<
-NM"lt
~
o
U
-;;
.5
~
~~
o 0
uu
<<i"i
.5.5
~~
'"
'0 .....
~
"
-5
'"
"
t;j
=
:~
~
1010 I
00
00
'" -
"
<ll
=
o
.~
o
il
<;;
z
.;
....."
o ...
~'E
o "
... '"
" ~
-5 .-
.. 1;1
~ '2
8~d
0>....
... "O.~
]~g
e~5
... 0 >
~ 0 e
'0 '
o
o
'"
.2
-
....
EA ~Vt EA
........ ....
00
00
ON
N
00600
~~o~o
V'llOo'Of"i
N C
EAEAEAfAEAfAEA
00 0 ('I") lIi lIi 0
M-I:"--NN-.
..o<o::fN...o...o~
\ONIO~"':t"N
-
VtEAEAEAfA~-e.4
0000000
ooooo~o
OOOdOV')N
O_lIiMf<"'l__
-
EAVtEAVt~VtVt
0000000
0000000,
ooci.nviddd
00 NN"':t"--
Vtitl't""'EAVtEAEA
"':t"'l::t\O"l:t"':t"-\O
000000'\0
000000'\0
NNNNN-N
c
~
'"' .- .to
~~ en
U"'" 0
] ~1~
3 ~ a:~ 5
~ g 8 ~. ~, r= .~
~._--r;o;SC
5 '0 t: g g Cl '5
'riila~~~~~
!ioE-55'':>
i ~ ~';;2';;2 ~ rJ
a61;ooa:o
g.<<S._'O'O:;Ir;o;S
<0...<<,--,,,.:
'000'00'0'0
~~HH!~~
0000000
uuuuuuu
]]]]]]]
~~~~~~~
ooO'\~
- N
- -
o
o
o
-c
'"
....
o
o
".;
N
....
..,.
r-:
-
N
-
....
o
o
o
N
-
....
o
q
'"
""
....
'0
""
""
-
f
go
~~o.
.::: 5 r;o;S
... e t::
c..,,=
... ~ "a
cS~gp
"
~ gr 5
~:.a~
',= r= <<S
g.E .s
.!a ~ gf
.5 Q)'=
e c..-
'Oe~
<( 0.. e
"
"'"
o
U
'"
-
o
o
N
N
'"
....
o
'"
o
..
....
..
.....
N
o
-
....
o
o
o
o
-
....
o
'"
.,,;
-
....
'0
""
""
-
o
o
'"
...
..,.
-
00
00
00
",r-:-
N
~
"'"
~"
~<ll
"8"';
= 5
:3 .=
.~ :.a
.~ ""g
!3 .s :0-
..,.~~
~ ~ fa
or--:..c
~(,09C)
- d 5
'c C en
:3.9.5
..c .~ r;o;S
~ '0 e
~""ge
o
o
-0
..
....
o
'"
r-:
""
-
....
o
o
o
..
-
....
o
o
.;
""
....
'0
""
""
-
" "
'0 ~ ~
"'" ~ 1;- 1;-
~ ~ ~.g .g
-- --~ 5 5 5
Q) ~ 5 ~ P-4 ~
e? .., .-; ..... ..... .....
~ ~_oo 0_
..c ..c tt-. Q) Q) _ Q) ~
u u 0 "'.~ Iii'.~ 0
v ven5o"co~
.::: "",.::: ~"'il Z ::s Z
~~~rI5"'tt-.~tt-.-g
.;;v.;;.vo O<<s
.- e .- T1 v cS v ~
.~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'c::s
'O.D '0 - ~1> tf'o1>
<<<jo".:2".:~
" "
"'" "'"
o 0
U .U
..,.
-
....
........
o
o
o
""
00
00
01.0
- ..
....
..
.....
o
o
-
........
..,.0
'" '"
or--:
'" ""
-
....
........
o
o
o
o
-
00
00
00
'" ..
-
....
........
o
o
o
-
00
00
o-.:i-
N ""
........
....
'0
""
""
-
'0 '0
"" ""
"" ""
- -
" "
"'" "'"
o 0
uu
'"
-
'0 .....
- -
"
"'"
o
U
o
o
o
...
'0
-
....
o
q
'"
'0
-
....
o
..,.
r-:
.....
N
....
o
q
'"
.....
N
....
o
o
o
-
-
....
'0
""
""
-
"'"
"
"
~:l
...3
o
....~
" ...
" ..
....>
"
> =
.~ ~
~ 5
'c e
's ~
"'" .0
<<
~
'"
tg
o
::Et!
~~
"
"'"
o
U
..
-
<(
...
..
..
e
....
..
i:!
<(
u
~ >
~
.. ~
..
e ~
e t)
.. ~
u ~
..
<2
~
:.>2
!
:;;:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
... ;; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.. 0 0 0 ".,
.. .. ;; "., 0 0 ..... 00 0 '" ..... - ~ M '" "'-
~ .. M 0 "., "., ..". '"
.. .51 .. .. "., - e t:: - a- '" -
E .1:: .. .. a- '"
':'0= ;.
fI)"l:J<~
101< Ill: "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
~i 0 0 0 0 <.; <.; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"! 0 0 0 "! "! "., "., 0 "., "l "., "! 0 "l 0 "l "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "! "! 0
.. .."., .,,; on on "., "., .0 .. .,; .. - M - on - M - "., "., "., "., "., "., "., "., "., "., "., "., "., "., "., on
I: 1:'" 0 - "., :! :! ..... 00 a- ~ '0 ~ 0 ~ '0 '0 ~
- - - - ".,
.. ..
.!le "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
~ - 0 '0 a- 00 ..... - ..... '" 0 ~ a- '" ~ -
M a- 0 ~ "., 00 '" ..... ~ a- "1 ~ ~ 0 "l
- e oa M ,..; .0 "., .0 .. .,; .. - M - "., - M -
.l!.- S ~ 0 - "., ..... 00 a- ~ '0 ~ 0 ~ '0 '0 ~
~ i:: ~ '" - - - - ".,
.. ..
"'U ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" l: l: l: l: l: l:
E 0 0 0 0 , , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 "., "., 0 "., "l "., "! "! "l 0 "l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E .. .,,; .,,; on on .0 .. .,; .. - M - "., - M - .,,; .,,; .,,; .,,; .,,; .,,; .,,; on .,,; .,,; on .,,; .,,; .,,; .,,; .,,;
.. .. ~ 0 - "., ..... 00 a- ~ '0 ~ 0 ~ '0 '0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. f;I;, '" - - - - ".,
~ "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.. 0 . . , 0 0 , , , , . , , , , , ,
I: .. "! "! "! "! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "!
... .. "., "., "., "., on on on on on on .,,; on on .,,; on on on on ".,
.. f;I;, - ~ ~ M M M M M M M ~ M M ~ M M M M M
U '" "" "" ... ... ... ... ... "" ... ... "" "" "" "" "" ""
"" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
.....1-c 00 ~ ~ ~ '0 '0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
fI) 1ii . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~t 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" z z z '" '" z z z z z z z z z z '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
-g :;;
~ !3 I:;; '"
~ 0 il ~ l'l
.. Ql '" "
.~ '" ... ... !3 ~ ..
" .. .. a "" " 1 til ~ ..
'" 'S: .9 0 ~ ..9 " .;;;
'" :>
" ... ... ~ i 'fj ii: ""' 1;; ~ .. .. .~
" .!! ] .. u 0 a I] g
..!! "" " ~ ... .9 ~ " .. " :g ~ t) '"
~ ~ ... " "" ~ ~ !3 dog e '" 2 " 2 " ;., ~
E=: i " "" u ~ oS " g ~ " " til ..!! ..
<Il oS 0 ~ ~y .'" ~ .. ~ ~ 0 0
.. " ~ ~ ~ ;; u
.. ..!! ~ 0 ] '" ~ ~ 0 .. E- '€ ~ " ~ ~ .. tln ....
.. ~ .'" '" 0 ~ 0 ! ~
.. .~ ~ g u .. ... :.>2 '"
f;I;, .~ " "" <( .;;; ... " .. ~ ~ .. " .= .. .....
~ :> e ~ M M .;;; '" ""' .. ..s u- 1;; :.>2 g 1;; ~ " :.>2 ...
18 ~ g 0 .;: ~ .. ;; :.>2
""' " " ~i g ~ :.>2 ~ .~ g a ~
0 0 " ;;: .. c a a 0 ~ >< c " ~ 0 .5 c ~
E- o Ql '" " 0 ~ N ~ "" 0
..!l "" ..9 - ~ .9 " of: ... .~
;; 'i .... .... c ~ "" e ~ :.>2 ~ '" .~ ~
" ;. .. 0 u i E- E- '" 0 " ~ " ~ c "il " " ..!l ...
U '" 1;; ~ .$l ';;; "" .~ " ~ 8.~ '€ ~ :e ... c U 2 .~
0 -e e e 'S: " 'ii :g . 's " t) :.>2 :.>2
:fi e ] " Q :g 'S: .~ " " ~ ~ ~ :g
a " ~- e " " c ...
0 0 "" ;. 0 0 0 a 0 ~ a a
~ 0 " ii'.i ::E ::E ~ " ~~ i:i5 " " ::E ii'.i ~ 0 0 ~ "
> >- U 0-1 ~ Z "" u "" E-O 0 Z "" 0-1 Z '" "" > 0-1 "" "" "" "
... ~
... b
" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
~ u " " " " " " " " " " " " " " '"
" I.~ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " ii
Q .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .!i::E
>2 " " " " " " " " " " .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" :5 ::= :3 :5 :3 :: :3 :5 ::= ::= ::= ::= :: ::= :: ==t;
-8 -8 -8 :> ~ :> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 ~ ~ ~ '0 ~ ~ '0 .~ .~ 'g 'g .~ .~ .~
0 0 0 " " .. .. ..
u u U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ""
"" a- 0 - '" M ~ "., '0 ..... 00 a- 0 - '" M
- '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" M M M M
N
..
...
eo
"0
=>.
>;;l
..
..
~
...
..
'"
>;;l
'i
'"
o
=>.
e
j:l.,
..
'"
0:0
0:0
C!
08
M
-<
..
..
..
e
....
...
~
-<
...;;
~ c:I "i ~
.!!!w.2 = !
= 1:1 ~
.......
"'...<~
~<
'"
..
..
..
e
e
o
u
_'4)'00000000000000
QI;;oC!~~~C!C!ooooC!oC!
"'" GIS.,.) """"""""v) "".,.;.,..;.,).,..; "".,.;""
..
f ..
... ...
.. Q"
..
O~~~~~~~~~Ei9~64~~
..
- t oa
:! .- is
~ i:; '"
~ .. 0
tIlU~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1oo'~'COO
f'-I . .0
.",~O
...:i~~N
..
...
<=
"C
Q.
~
..
..
f;lo,
..
..
'"
~
"C
..
'"
Q
Q.
E
ll.
'It
e gggggggggggggg
Suoc:iooooooocidciovi
OQ,)'II:t''o:t''o:t'''I:t'r'--''I:t''l:l'-.:t''l:t''l:t''l:f"oo:t''l:tVl
...r.. -
~
~~~fi009~fiI7fi17~{A.{A.{04{04{A.""
..
"
.. ..
.. ..
;r..
U
00000000000000
00000000000000
vi"";"";vi.,.j"';"';"';"";"";"';"';"";d
MM~M"CMMMMMf""lMMVl
-
fOoI'7{A.{A.fiI7{04{04{04fi17{A.{A.{A.f04{A.f04
00000000000000000000000000
0000000000000
0000000000000
NNNNNNNNNNNNN
u =
g ~ e~ l!.l-g
_u - CUQ::.=:.E2..9~
..!! .~g ~ ~ ~ Jl ] ] ~ l!.l '~Ii
- frJ; ~ =5 lZl_O;:s'-
E:u::E u..!!"'''';l%lIl-;jJ,;:
.. I I,.. c..~-g-g..~,b 5 "';:
r: 2! ~'a a ii > i; ~ c ~ ;,. .8 t:
.5 .51"i~:;;; > g =,:::;;; 0 il "ii18
"" "" .. !a ... "8 e' c !a ".:: > 0
il il ~ Q., l! ._ ';: :;;; Q.';; !!! 0 Z
--",,,,o";:lta"'-'''!l! I
's.~t).~i~ e~'~~'E:!"C]
Ii iU:.5""<(B 0~.5 s,g ta~.;
Q.,Q.,tIl...:i ...U......:i~""Q.,...~
~
Q
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.~.!2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2 .2
:3:3:5:3~:3:3:3:3=~=:::E
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~.~ .~.~.~
1L.1L.1L.~~IL.~l..I.tlL.lL.lL.~1L.1L.
0000000
C!C!C!~C!~C!
V'lv)v")V'lIOIOI.t1
&4 &4 &4&4 {oII;t &4ii1':t
..
1;j
..
r/)
....
-
'ii
...
... 0
o I;
~""
S 8 E
u "
e c .!
is] '"
>. .s :5 rIi
.Dc Os
as .6 ] '_g
:-s! 0 ~ .s ='
~ ~ ~ "d 01)
......c ';::"" 0 0
(:l. "..... 01)....
ofl.lfl.lC"d
~ .2 c td a
c ,.. 0 ....
:::l -.- 0 fI.I
'...'0 :a u..2
~~'0~2
o '
o
o
0'
'"
""
<<S td cQ cQ cQ cQ cQ cQ
""""""""
0000000
ooo~~oo
OOOll")lI")OO~
"::t"-.:t "::t" 00 000\0\ 0
~ ~ '5
~~~~~~~>
OOOOOOOfl.l
OOOOOOO='
. . . . . . . 0
V"lll") V"l 0 0 V"l V"l._
~~~~~oo'OOa
~~it4it4it4it4~>
0000000000000000
00000000
00000000
NNNNNNNN
'"
fa
I-
00
~
:;J
~ ~
.~ ~
,- "" .. "
b 9 '" 0
fG 0.;;;1 ~
- ~ "" ~
.~'C:~~.;
Ui c <.t:: c 0
o 0 Q:C:
:I: .;:; .. ~ ~
!i]~ 8.:0
r:;~-s].~
ooe~~
~ ~ o.~ S
Q.,Q.,::ECll%l
E
~
u
~
0.
'"
:0
S
-
o
"
'"
"
o'bj)
:::!,,,
fI.I~
on i5 ta
_'';:: (:l.
"'-
.s"O .~
-s .- u
.- > ~
~ 00 8
- " e
o ~ ~ 8
5"12 Q., "
;:i..c_'"O
uu.!.E
.!::.!:: 0 g
~ ~.....-
fI.I fI.I fI.I fI.I fI.I fI.I fI.I fI.I
.~ .~ .2 .~ .~ .2 .~ .~
~:5:5:5:3:5:E:E
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~
~~~~~~~~
""
~
00
"l
-
'"
~
""
o
o
o
on
""
00
"l
-
...
-
""
00
o
o
N
~
o
'"
~ bl) ~
a..c u
" .~ "0
!a" [ij
uu ...
~;::l !a
o~ ~
B]_~
~ -:5'~
~ is'';:: 5
~:9~:S~
a:E ~ fG ;;a-
...:lU~er:::c.e
i!!
;;:
...
'"
"
1;j
-
r/)
-s
'ii
E
.!
'"
"
o .;
u "
o.!2
""1;j
Sa
... 0;
~..
2"0
.... [ij
u '"
ll..!!
~ 2
""
~
00
"l
-
'"
~
""
o
o
o
on
""
00
"l
-
...
-
""
00
o
o
N
"
~
;;:
on
'"
"
u
... 2 !l
-!a ~
a....2_~
Q.) U c 1:0
a e.9..2
Uli:~~
~- '" "
......td(;;'_
CI E .s ,~
~ C Q.) +5
.- <( u>
~';;"[ij...
~ u 5 c
o .... ... ='
00:;;.5 2
ta:a '" "
....l u::E a
-~
b
OIl
"''''
~8
""I::!
uc~
~UM
o
0..
.;
~
..
~
o
.~
]-
o
u
~
<S
"
.2
tl
"
"0
"
~
..
;e
'"
'"
o
0..
!i
r/)
-s
'ii
E
B
.~
'"
"
o
u "
" 0
..c .~
.s-;;
"'00
~ e
0"0
~ [ij
~ '"
" "
~2
~
o
o
'"
00
N
~
""
""
'"
"
'5
>
~
00
"l
-
...
-
~
""
'"
"
o
'5
>
~
o
'5
>
""
00
"l
-
...
-
""
~
~
z
00
o
o
N
:;J'
.~
o
:I:
..Q
.~
~
~
..
~
"
~
;;:
"
~
;;:
...
o
on
N
~
on
""
o
C!
on
N
""
on
...,
-
...
N
""
o
o
o
...
N
""
o
o
,,;
-
N
""
00
o
o
N
'"
'"
-<
...
"
'"
e;
...
"
~
-<
]=.~
."." ~ ,," Ii
;;.. ~
-=-=~u
rol~ ,:.:
.:l
"
'"
e
e;
'"
u
13 ~ ~~
~~~ ~"ii 1::
"'O~~ "OlI,)~lI,)
0-.... l1,) tIl_::S
;:l -"" ;:l -.; <IS C-
._ +:i ~ ._ ~ ~
E ,5" E .;; 1: .g
o s:: ~ (1) ~ ._ t/)
9--ib ~ c..'r,t) C "0
C ::s _ ~ "0..0 C
O"'V 0,,00"
" .s;j "" g .;;
'€ .;; "E<@!=ijS
"-",, "._-=~,^
__C;::CI)_O~~r:-'M
c.;:::''''' ~ tr} I.t=i +:i..~
..c~... ..1:"--..0,....::66'-
bl)--- bOO' > 0' VJ
:SIOO~::::sOQ.)M~
OI:"--O\-oNtfj~
...~~'U;'...~ ..'-'
.;:;--_..c-_rIl";;
E~~~id~L~
ii:";;"iit;li:"ii~'ii~
o
o
a-
..
N
";<<i==<<i
e; e e e e
:s :s :s :s :s
e e e e e
...
'G)-;g 0 0 0 0 0 0
'^ '^ q q q 0
.... . 0 0 0
,," - ,., '^ '^
'" '" N 0
.. .. -
... "
" '"
-Q
CVt""'{ol;~VtVt ...
....... ,., '^ '^ 0 N 0
u'. N ,., 00 - 00 '^ ,.,
;; c.I c r--: 0 ..; -0 vi -0 0
... .. $: N ,., ,., '0 00 a- N
'" i: .. N
f-< '" 0
"'U
~VtVtE.4Vt{A. ...
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 '" 0 q 0 0
e '" ,..: 0 ,., -0 '^ vi 0
'" " N ,., ,., '0 00 '" 0
" lo. N
'"
,:.: Vt 64 EA {A. {A. {A. ...
...
" 0'0'0'0'0'0' 0
'" '" Ol/"'lOOOO 0
.. '" ...oo\MMdd 0
..
" lo. NNM\OOOV'l 0
U -
E.4 {A. {A. Vt "* (A. ...
_]'i:\Gl '0 '0 '0 '0 .... ....
l'#.l llII I:IlI 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0
""'8."0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"';;J,~N N N N N N N
~
os
"0
Cl.
OJ
t
...
..
'"
'"
OJ
"0
~
<=
Cl.
<=
..
ll..
""
..
"
.52
l5 '0
,- "
.!! en t) '"0 e
r:;~~~.g~.s
","ij.i~fr~-<
r:j~~~g~
OO-"~~""
... ... p.. OJ ....
p.. p.. - f-<'" "
V")r-..::;o~~
>< >< >< ~ ~.M
('f')trlOo>O:
~
:;;:
c:-
"
.c
.c
~
"
..
OJ
'"
~
'"
Q
Q.) Q.) lI,) Q.) Q.) G,)
] ~ ~ ~ .!:! ~
000000
p..p..p..p..p..p..
"
.\!
"0
p..
r---OOQ'lO-N
t"")("I1M"o:t"'=t"o:t
,.,
....
...
, 0 0 0
0 0 ltl
- - ltl
,., N ..:
'"
'"
...
...... ...
0 0 0 .e-
O 0 0
0 0 0 ;;
N '^ '^ "
,., "
"
"
......... "
"
"
.... .... '0 "
00 .... co e
N .. vi
N a- N ;=
a- -
"
"
-
......... :l
'"
0 0 0 f-<
0 0 0
0 0 0
N '^ 0
co -
.........
, 00
00
od
o '^
'^
.........
~ '0 '0
0 0
1<1 0 0
Z N N
..
II ,,OJ
'" " ..
11::"'''
o ~1ii
~ "...
J!'~ ~
"U '"
0_'"
.- "'.....
i fi 0
.- 'OJ "
u ....l.52 ~
u ..."
IS t 8..'s.
f! ;= .. !il
E-t~~U
8
IS
o
.. ..
" "
u u
'E 'E
'" "
'" '"
" u u
u__
:':.,c..Q
o " "
p..p..p..
.... '^ '0
............
..
-g,
"'",
ijo
::o~
a~
UM
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rlmentlOlvlslon
Animal Control
User Fee Descrl Ion
Altered License Fee
Date
212012009
DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
The fee to license an aliered dog for 1 year will be increased from $15to $20. Licenses for 2 years ($25) and 3 years ($35) will
stay the same.
Personnel Costs
StralghtTIIll8
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
Dept. or DiY.
Overhead
TotaIBun:lened
Labor Cost/Hr.
H.... by
Posllion per Unit
0.2
0.5
Total La
Cost
6.50
6.33
0.00
0.00
Position
Animal License Su rvisor
License Checker
20.79
11
8.75 29.54
0.50 11.50
2.954
1.15
o
o
o
o
o
32.49
12.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
12.82
Material & Rental Costs
00_ Cost Each O_R_ Unit Cost
License Tao 0.35 1 0.35
Door Hanaer 0.1 1 0.1
Cash Receipt 0.1 1 0.1
Postaoe 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.89
Other Costs (Equipment, faclllt rental, part-time labor wlo benefltsl
D._ Cost Each Quantity Requi'ed Unit Cost
Comouter EQuioment & Software 4.00 1 4.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 4.00
ComDllrlsons to ProDOSed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino CountY
Moreno Valley
Riverside Countv
More lLessl than SIB. TotalSefv\oeOlfectco.t 18.71
Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae City-VllideGen. & Admin.
15.00 15.00 -33.33% Rtlte010.75% 2.01
10.00 10.00 -100.0% TotlIl SeMee Cost/Unit 20.73
8.00 (12.00 -150.0%
Recommended Fee 20.00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.73
Current F.. Amount 15.00
Fee lnerellse (Decruse) 5.00
001
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeparbnentIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Animal Control 124 4320 Altered License Fee Refund 2/20/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
This increases the refund amount from $25 to $50 that an pet owner can be refunded for spaying or neutering their
dog within 60 days of purchasing an unaltered pet license.
Personnel Costs
Position
StraightTme
Labo
Fringe 0181 Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
Dept. or DIY.
Overhead
otaI Burdened Hours by
Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit
Total La
Costpe
NA
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
NA
Other Costs IEauiamenl faclll~ rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
edF
I
!
.~
~
~.
~
j
.~
I
j
ompansons to Propos ee
More ILess than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentage
This is not an additional fee but a reduction
Total ServIce Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
RateG10.75%
TotalServiceCost/Unit
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
002
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Animal Control Department 124 4430 Delinauencv Penaltv (Licensina) 212012009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the penalty fee added to the cost to the pet license fee for failure to license from $15 to $20
Pel'8onnel Costs
Position
Animal License Su ervisor
License Checker
2.954
1.15
o
o
o
o
o
Labor CostlHr.
32.49
12.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Position per Un"
0.4
0.4
Total Lebo
costpe
13.00
5.06
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unn of SelVice: 18.06
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Cash ReceiDt 0.1 1 0.1
Posta!:!e 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unn of SelVice: 1.44
Other Costs (Equipment, facllll1 rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to PraDosed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino County
Moreno Vallev
Riverside County
Fee Der Unit
15.00
18.00
8.00
More (L_l than SIB.
Dollal'8 Percenta~e
(5.00 -33.33%
12.00 -11.1%
112.00 -150.0%
003
Total ServIce Direct Cost 18.90
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate CD 10.75% 2.03
Total Service Co8tlUnit '093
Recommended Fee '000
Recommended Fee SUbsidy 093
Current Fee Amount 1500
Fee InallS88 (Decrease) 500
",. -~
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentIDlvlalon
Animal Control
User Fee Deserl on
Re lacement &Transfer Ta
Description of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
Increases Ihe "additional lag issued 10 replace a losl, slolen misplaced or damaged lag" from $310 $5
Increases Ihe "transfer of ownership of a licensed dog 10 a new owner in lieu of a fee for new license" from $3 10 $5
Increases Ihe ''transfer of a currenllicense from another jurisdiction" from $3 10 $5
Personnel Costs
Oepl.orDiv,
Overhead Labor CoslIHr.
2.954 32.49
1.15 12.65
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 9,03
Position
Animal License Su rvisor
License Checker
F Ol8IDIrect
Benefits Labo< Cost
8.75 29.54
0.50 11.50
20.79
11
Material & Rentel Costs
Hours by
PosiIionperUn'
0.2
0.2
Total La
Cost
6.50
2.53
0.00
0.00
Desa'iptlon Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
License Tag 0.25 1 0.25
Door Hanoer 0.1 1 0.1
Cash Receiol 0.1 1 0.1
Poslage 0.41 2 0.82
Cilation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.77
Other Costs IEaulDment, faclllt rentel, Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl
0__ Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omoansons to Prooosed Fee
More ILess than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee OAr Unit Dollars Percentene
San Bernardino County 5.00 - 0.00%
Moreno Vallev 3.00 12.00 -66.7%
Riverside County 2.00 13.00 -150.0%
004
Totel ServiCe Direct COst 10.80
C~'Mde Gen, & Mnin.
Rate@10.75% 1.16
Total SefvieeCoetlUnil 11 QA
Recommended Fee fino
Recommended Fee Subtldy 696
Current Fee Amount 300
Feelncrelse(DecreaIMlI ?nn
User Fee Detennination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
OepartmenUDlvlalon Fund Account Uaer Fee Description Date
LivestocK ApprenenSlon I-ee - ureater I nan
Animal Control 124 4759 500lbs 212012009
Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other commente:
This increases the livestock (over 5001bs) apprehension fee from $50 to $150
Personnel Coste
Dept.orOtv.
Labor Cost Overhead labor Cost/Hr.
9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57
7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83
6.85 24.02 2.402 26.42
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 55.23
..... by
Position per u
0.4
1
0.4
PoslUon
Animal Control Su rvisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re 101 s
26.32
18.95
17.17
Material & Rentel Coste
T....La
Coot
15.83
28.83
10.57
0.00
Desal_ Coot Each QuantllyReqtjred UnIlCost
Vehicle/FuellMaintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EauipmenllMaintenance 5 1 5.00
Soecialized Haulino EouiDment 100 1 100.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 120.00
Other Coste (Eaulpment, faclllt rental, Dart-Ume labor wlo benefitsl
Desal_ Cost Each Quantity Requred UnilCost
Total other costs per Unit of Service:
c
rI
P
dF
omD8 80n8 to roDOS8 ee
More (Less I than SIB.
JurlsdlcUon Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 100.00 50.00 -50.00%
Moreno Valley 75.00 75.00 -100.0%
Riverside CDuntv 90.00 60.00 -86.7%
Total8ervlce Direct COlt
CIly-WIde Gen. &Admln.
RIIl&G10.75%
Total ServlceCollllUnll
Recommended Fee
ReeommencMd Fee Subaldy
Current Fee Amount
F.. IncrgH {Decre...j
005
175.23
18.84
1QA.nA
15000
4406
5000
10nnn
~
User Fee Detennination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentlDlvlslon
Animal Control
User Fee Descrl on
Lar e Livestock Board
DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
This increases the large livestock daily board fee from $12.50 to $20.00
Personnel Costs
21.47
16.25
Dept. Of Div.
Beneflts Labor Cost Overtle8d labor CostIHr.
8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43
6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unitaf Service: 16,76
Houno by
Position per U
0.2
0.4
Total
Cost
6.69
10.07
0.00
0.00
Position
Animal Shetter Kennel Su erviso
Animal Shetter Attendant
Material & Rental Costs
Desc:rl_ Cool Eaoh Quantity Required unn Cost
Animal Care 8 1 8.00
8.00
Other Costs IEaulDment, facllit rental. oart-tlmelabor wlo bsneflts'
Desc:rl_ Cost Each QuanllIyR_ Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comoarlsons to Pro Dosed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino County
Moreno Valley
Riverside County
Fee Der Unit
15.00
11.00
15.00
More lLessl than SIB.
Dollars Pereentaoe
5.00 -33.33%
9.00 -81.8%
5.00 -33.3%
lollll Service onct COlt 24.76
Clly-Wlde Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 10.75% 2.66
TotIIt Servlee COlt/Unit ?74?
Recommended Fee ?nnn
Recommended Fee Subsidy 742
Current Fee Amount 1250
Fee lnere... (Deere...) 7 fin
006
~.
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
A rehension Fee
Date
212012009
DescrlpUon of service, demand, subsidy, and other commente:
This eliminates the two tier Apprehension Fee for aKered and unaltered pets and establishes a single fee of $1 00 for the first
apprehension, $200 for the second and $350 for the third
Pe..onnel Costs
straight Time
Fringe ot8lO1rect
Benefits Labor Cost
9.65 35.97
7.26 26.21
6.85 24.02
3.597
2.621
2.402
o
o
o
o
Dept. or DIY.
PoslUon
Animal Control Su ervisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re /Oi s
vertlead
26.32
18.95
17.17
0181 Burdened
Labor Cost/Hr.
HoII'sby
Position per Unl
0.4
1
0.4
Total Labo
Cost pe
15.83
28.83
10.57
0.00
39.57
28.83
26.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
55.23
Material & Rental Costs
_on Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle/FueVMaintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EQuipmentlMaintenance 5 1 5.00
Animal Care/Oisoosal 75 1 75.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 95.00
Other Costs /EQulpment, facilit rental, part-Ume labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More /Les s) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dolls.. Percentage
San Bernardino County 80.00 20.00 -25.00%
Moreno Valley 50.00 50.00 -100.0%
Riverside County 35.00 65.00 -185.7%
007
ToI8I Service DiAlCl: Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
R81e@10.75%
TotaI$ervlceCoetJUnit
150.23
16.15
166.38
Recommended Fee
varies
66.38
80.00
20.00
Recommended Fee StbBldy
CurrwrtF..Amounl
F881~(~)
-,
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtrnentlOlvlslon
Animal Control
User Fee Descri tlon
Board Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the daily board fee from $8,00 to $10.00
Personnel Costs
Dept. Of Div.
Overhead Labor CostIHr.
30.39 3.039 33.43
22.89 2.289 25.18
o 0,00
o 0.00
o 0,00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Position
Animal SheKer Kennel Su erviso
Animal SheKer Attendant
21.47
16.25
8.92
6,64
Material & Rental Costs
HOl.lrsby
Position per Unit
0.2
0.4
Total Labor
Cost per
6.69
10.07
0.00
0.00
a._ Cost Each QuartityRequired Unncost
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.00
Other Costa (Equipment, facilit rental. Dart-time labor wlo benefltal
Descrl_ Cool E"'" OuanlllyReqUrecI Unit Cost
Total other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More ILeas than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 9.00 11.00 -11.11%
Moreno Vallev 6.00 14.00 -66.7%
Riverside Countv 15.00 5.00 33.3%
008
Total Setvice Dired Colt 21.76
Cily-WIde Gen. & Admin.
RateQ10.75% 2.34
Total8erviceCosllUnil 7.41n
Recommended Fee 1nnn
Recommended F.. Subsidy 1410
Current Fee Amount 800
Fee Increase (Deaease) ?nn
_.--
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmenllOlvlslon
Animal Control
User Fee Descrl on
Pick-U Service Char e
DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
This increases the fee charged for pick-up services from $25.00 to $50.00
Personnel Costa
Positlon
Animal Control Su rvisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re Di s
26.32
18.95
17.17
Fringe Total onct Dept. or DIY. otaI Burdened Hours by Total
BenefIts Labor Cost 0Vemead labor CoItIHr. Position per Un Coot
9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57 0.2 7.91
7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83 0.5 14.42
6.85 24.02 2.402 26.42 0.2 5.28
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 27.61
S_Tlme
Material & Rentel Costa
Desaiption Cost Eadl QuantilyRequk'ed Unit Cost
Vehicle/FueVMaintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EauiDment/Maintenance 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.00
Other Coats IEaulll/1lent, faclllt1 rental, Dart-time labor wlo bsnefltal
Desaiption Coot Each a_R_ Unn Cost
Total other costs per Unit of Service:
ComD8r sons to Pro Dosed Fee
More ILessI than SIB.
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino County
Moreno Vallev
Riverside Countv
Fee Der Unit
varies
varies
varies
Dollars
varies
varies
varies
Percentaae
varies
varies
varies
Total Service DiNct COlt 47.61
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 10.75% 5.12
Total Service ColltnJnil 5? 73
Recommended Fee !ill 00
Recommended Fee Sulnldy 273
CUlRlntFeeAmount 2500
Feelncre..e{OeCNI"> ?500
009
~,
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentlDlvislon
Animal Control
User Fee Oeseri Ion
Ado tion Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This creates a single adoption fee of $30,00
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $25 to $30 for each dog or cat
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $40 to $30 for each puppy or kitten
Personnel Costs
21.47
16,25
Frtnge otaIDIrect
BenefiIs l.abor Cost OVerhead
8.92 30.39
6,64 22,89
T......
Labor CosIIHr.
3.039 33.43
2.289 25.18
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Hours by
Position per u
0.2
0.4
T... La
Cost
6.69
10.07
0.00
0.00
Position
Animal Sheller Kennel Su erviso
Animal Sheller Attendant
Material & Rentsl Costs
""'"-' CostEacll QuanlilyRequlred UrilCost
Animal Care 5 5 25.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 25.00
O1her Coats (Eauloment faclll~ rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl
~ Cost Each QuanlityRequi'ed Unit Cost
Total other costs per Unit of Service:
Comoarlsons to ProDosed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino County
Moreno Valley
Riverside Countv
Fee per Unit
20.00
30.00
75.00
More (Less) than SIB.
Dollars Percentage
(10.00 -50.00%
- 0.0%
45.00 60.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@10.75'llo
Total Servlce Cost/Untt
41.76
4.49
4675
Recommended Fee ::\0 no
Recommended Fee Subsidy 16 25
Current Fee Arno~ 40 00
'''_''''''''I_I (10 om
010
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Oe rbnentIDlvlslon
Animal Control
User Fee Oescrl tlon
Quarantine Dail Board
Description of servlcs, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the quarantine daily board fee from $10.00 to $15.00
Personnel Costs
Position per u
0.2
0.4
6.69
10.07
0.00
0.00
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Su erviso
Animal Shelter Attendant
21.47
16.25
0tlPl orDiv.
Benef1t8 Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr.
8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43
6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unlt of Service: 16.76
Ho<n by
Total
Cost
Material & Rental Costs
~ Cost Each QuantilyR8(JJired UnIl Cost
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total other costs per Unit of Service: 5.00
Other Costs (Eaulpment, facUIt rental, part-time labor wlo benefita)
llescriplion Cost Each a.......ReqUred Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Le.. ) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 9.00 1.00 11.11%
Moreno Valley 6.00 4.00 66.7%
Riverside County 15.00 (5.00 -33.3%
Toc.lSeMeeOlredCm 21.76
CIly-WIdeGen.&Admln.
Rme 0 10.75'111 2.34
TolIl5ervlceCOlt/UnIl '.4 10
Recommended Fee 1 ~ nn
Recommended Fee SublIcty 9 10
CurrentF..Amount 1000
FeelllCnl."{DecreaIe) Ron
011
User Fee Detennination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentJDlvlelon
Animal Control
User Fee Deacrlptlon
Rabies Vaccination De
Oeacrlptlon ot aerYlca, damand, aubaldv, and other commenta:
The rabies vaccination will be increased by $2 to cover the cost the contracted veterinarians charge to the City.
Personnel Coata
Poaitlon
NA
Material & Rental Coata
llescrlpllon
c.... Each
Hours by Total La
Position perU coat
Quantity Required
Urlt Cost
Other Coata (Equipment, tacll"" rental Dart-time labor wlo benefltal
llescrlpllon Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comoarlaona to Propoaed Fee
More (Leaa than SIB.
Jurladlctlon Fee oer Unit Dollars PercentaDa
THIS IS A DEPOSIT ONLY
012
Total8ervlceDlIWCtCOSl 0.00
CIty.Willll Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 10.75% 0.00
TolIlServIeeCOlt/Unll nnn
Recommended Fee nnn
Recommended Fee SUbsidy 000
Current Fee Amount nOD
Fee lncre... (Decreue) nnn
-
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De artmentlOlvlslon
Fund
Code Enforcement
001
Date
2/23/2009
Description ofservlce, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
I nlS :!Ill:> aamlnlstrative Tee IS aaaea 10 me total amount of the heanng costs when these costs have not been paid In the time given
to the property owner and the hearing order is processed. The total amount is then placed as a lien against the property. The
proposed fee modification is to reflect increases in salaries and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has
not been undated in accordance with increases in salaries and materials since 1996.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Stra~tHIm. Fring. ~otaIo..... Dept. or DIY. ToIaIBlJ"denad Hauls by Total Labor
Position Labol - Labor Cool Owrhoad Labor CostIl-Ir. Position per UriI: Coot -
Administrative Assistant $24.09 $7.23 $31.32 $3.13 $34.45 3 $103.35
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $103.35
Material & Rental Costs
""""- Coot Each Ouan!ly Reqund UritCost
Mailinas $0.42 2 $0.84
Printinalcooieslrecelotslreaortl $0.10 7 $0.70
fax cover sheet/County Recorde rl
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.54
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefltsl
OelI<:rlpOoo Cost Each Quartlly Required Unt Coot
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
ComDarlsons to Prooosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee DBr Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 120.00
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
013
Tolal Service Direct Cost 10489
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@16.07% 16.86
Tolal Service CostlUnlt 17174
Recommended Fee 17nnn
~m..-.cMdF..Sl.t*dy 174
Current Fee Amount 9500
Feetncrease(Oecrease) ?finn
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement
Code Enforcement 001 4815 liens on vacant lots 3/112009
Description of service, c1eman ,subsldv, and other comments:
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement liens a9ainst properties whose owners have failed to pay the abatement costs for
vacant lots. There has been no fee increase since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries, and other
administrative costs associated with this orocess.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
StralgttTlme Fri..... Total Direct Dept. or Div. T etal Burdened H.... by Total Labor
Position La"'" - Labor Cost Ov_ Labor CostIHr. Posmon"... u.. Cost"...
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 92.81
d
Material & Rental Costs
DeocriplIon Cost Each Quartlty Requred Unit Cost
Mailinas 0.42 3 1.26
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.26
Other Costs (Equipment, faclll '!/ rental. D rt-tlme lebor wlo benefits \
~ Cost Each aua"lv Req","", Unil:Cost
0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
C
t P
dF
ompar sons 0 ropose ee
More (Lass) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nla nla
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total S8fVlce Direct Cost 9281
Clty-WllSe Gen. & Aclmln.
R8te@16.07% 9.98
TotelServlceCostlUnlt in? 7R
Recommended Fee inn nn
R8cc1mm....t.d Fee &aldy 278
Current Fee ....mount 1950
Feelncre8S&(Oecreese) Rn~n
014
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
OeoartmentlOlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Oescrlotlon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733 Reauest for demand letter 2/2312009
Description of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
When Code enforcement places a lien on a property, they file a Notice of Pendency with the County Audnor-Controller Recorder
(ACR). When an individual or company tries to buy, sell, refinance, etc they may be noticed by the ACR's Office the property may
show a lien. A demand letter is typically requested from an escrow company during the saleltransfer/refinance of property, which
details total amount owed to the City for liens, administrative citations or other charges pending against a property. Currently, the
City collects a $10 administrative fee for preparing a demand letter and $5 for each additional line item fee that includes abatement
costs, existing citations and hearing orders that have not yet been Iiened and a calculation of any interest owed on each of the debts.
Based on the average demand letter containing 5 addnionalline items ($5 for each item), for a total of approximately $35 per
demand letter. Updating these fees for personnel costs would bring the combined fee to $65 for the creation of a demand letter (no
charges for addilionallines).
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
StraighlTime F.nge Total Drect Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Houno by Total La""
Position La"'" - Labor Cost Ovorhead Labor CostIHr. Position per UnI: Cost~
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.13 34.45 2.5 86.13
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 86.13
Material & Rental Costs
Descr<>tioo Cost Each ' a......1v Required Unit Cost
Printing lcopieslfax $0.10 7 $0.70
cover sheell
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.7
Other Costs (Equipment, faclll y rental, oart-tlme labor wlo benefitsl
Des_ Cost Each Quartlty Required UnI Cost
Total other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
ComD8rlsons to ProDOsed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee OAr Unit Dollars Percenta"e
Other luslsdlctlons do not ore are demand letters.
Total SeMc:e Direct Cost 86 83
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
R8te@16.07%
Total Servlce CosttUnIt
13.95
inn 7R
Current Fee Amount
innnn
078
1000
Recommended Fee
R.commenclBd F_ &aidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
015
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Descriotion Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733" Duolicate Release of Lien fee 2/2312009
Description of service, idemand, subsidv, and other comments:
The $20 fee is an administrative fee for producing a Duplicate Release of Lien. This occurs when our department previously
complied with a request for a demand letter, the lien was paid through escrow, and a release was issued that was not recorded by
the party receiving the original release. The request must also be researched for additional fees owing and interest re-calculated.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe otalOi<ect Dept. or DiY. Total Burdened Hours by T otallabor
Position ,..... - labor Cost Ovemead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per urWt Cost pe
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.1317 34.45 0.75 25.84
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 25.84
Material & Rental Costs
De_ Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Printin~ IcoDiesJfax $0.10 3 $0.30
coversheell
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.3
Other Costs (Eauipment, facili :v rental. . art-time labor wlo benefits'
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino 30.00 0
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
. Account No. 001-000-4733 is used for building abatement fees
Account No. 001-000-4411 is used for administrative citation fees
016
TotaI8ervice Dired Cost 2614
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 16.07% 4.20
Total Service costIUnil :l0 :14
Recommended Fee :loon
RecommendeclFee SUbskly 034
Current Fee Amount 2000
Fee Increase (OecrHse) 1000
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4735 Release of Notice of Pendencv Fee 2/2312009
Description of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
A Notice of Pendency is a document that is recorded with the County Recorder's office to notify any potential buyer andlor lender
that there is some type of administrative action pending against the property and/or there is a lien against the property. This is an
administrative fee for releasing a notice of pendency for costs incurred. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries,
and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has not been updated in accordance with increases in salaries
and materials since 1996.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
s..~.. T"'" Fmoo Total Direct Dept. or DIY. Total Bu'dened """"'by To1a~:I
Position l.aboI - labor Cost Overhead labor CostIHr. Poslion per Unit CosI
Code Compliance Officer II $34.15 $10.25 $44.40 $4.44 $48.83 2 $97.67
Code Compliance Proc. Ass!. $20.74 $6.22 $26.96 $2.70 $29.66 2 $59.32
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $156.99
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quanlity Reql.ked UnI Cost
Mailings $0.42 2 $0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.84
Other Costs (Eaulpment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefltsl
000_ Cost Each Oua""" Reqund Unit Cost
County Recorder Fee $13.00 1 $13.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 13.00
C
t P
dF
ompansons 0 roDOse ee
More (Lass) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
Not available
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
017
Total Sefv\ce Dlnlct Cost 16999
City-WIde Gen. & Admin.
Rats@16.07% 27.32
TOIBI Service ColltlUnlt 1Q7~n
Recommended Fee 1M nn
Reoommended Fee SulMidy 1730
Current Fee Amount 9400
Fee Increase (Oecnlese) RRnn
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeDartment/Dlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Administrative fee for weed abatement on vacant
Code Enforcement 001 4815 lots 3/112009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Administrative fee for weed abatement incurred costs and staff time for processing abatements. There has been no fee increase
since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time salaries and other administrative costs associated with this nrocess.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
s..~.. Uno Fmge Total Dnct: Dept. or DIY. Total BU"dened HoIn by ToIaILabo<
Position La"'" - Labor Cost Ovemead Labor CostIHr. Postion per UriI: Cost per
Code Compliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 190.48
Material & Rental Costs
Descrlption Cost Each Qua....,. Roo..... Unt Cost
Mailinos 0.42 5 2.1
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2.1
Other Costs IEouiDmenl faclll", rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl
DescrlpIIon Cost Each Oua"" ROO..... Unil:CosI
Vehicle Exaense 30 30.00 2.00 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 60.00
CDmparlsons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nla nla
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total S8IYIce oQct Coet
C!ty-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@16.07%
Total Serv\c8 CostlUnlt
250 48
26.93
777 4n
RecommendldFellSubakly
77~ nn
240
11000
1Rfinn
Recommended Fee
Current Fee Amount
Feelncreese(Decrease)
018
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Descriotlon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4743 Vehicle Tow Release Fees 21912009
Deecrl on of service, demand, subsid ,and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. This fee was first adopted by Code Enforcement in 2008 to mirror the fee charged by
the Police Department for the same service. CVC 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as GTA are
not char ed and can obtain a release 7 da s a week 8am-7 m. All other releases can be obtained M-F 7:30-5:30 m. The current
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
StraIght TIme F..... Total Direct Dept. or DiY. TotalBl.I'dened H.... by Total La'"
Position Labo< Benefits labor Cost Ovemead Labor eosUHr. Positlon oer Unit Cost per
Code Comoliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Sr.lSuD Officer 57.03 17.11 74.14 7.4139 81.55 0.25 20.39
Code Enf. Processina Asst 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 1 29.66
Admin. SVCS. SUDer. 34.15 10.245 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.25 $12.21
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 159.92
Material & Rental Costs
De_ Cost Each Quantitv Reauired Unit Cost
Photos $2.00 4 $8.00
Reaular Mailinas 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 8.84
Other Costs IEouipment, facili :v rental, Dart-tlme labor wlo benefltsl
IDescrioUon Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle EXDense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 40.00
c
rI
toP
dF
omD8 sons roDOse ee
More (Lass) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nta nta
018
Total8eMce Direct Cost 208 76
Cily-WIde Gen. & Admin.
R8teCl16.07% 33.55
Tol8l8ervioeCostlllnll ?.4? ~1
Recommended Fee ?4n nn
R..,.,."...- F_ Subsidy 231
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) ?.4nnn
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/DIvision Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4411 Removal of Unauthorized Signs (New Fee) 2/912009
escr p on se ce, eman , au S ::IY, an er commen :
Direct costs incurred for removal of unauthorized signs. Recommended fee is for removal per sign. If an ordinance amendment is
approved to remove the certified mail requirement, costs would be reduced by $5.21, but the $100 fee per sign would still be
'ustified.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fn..... Total Direct Oept.orDIv. Total~ HDIn by TotalLabol
Position l.allor Benoflts Labor Cost 0.- Labor Co6t1Hr. Position per UnI Cos."",
Code Comoliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.4 19.53
Sr.lSuD Officer 43.87 13.16 57.03 5.7031 62.73 0.2 12.55
Code Enf. Processino Ass! 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 0.5 14.83
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 46.91
o
ItI of rvI d
ts
d bid
doth
Material & Rental Costs
DescrlpIIon Cost Each Quanlly Required Unit Cost
Certified Mailinos 5.21 1 5.21
Reaular Mailinas 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 6.05
Other Costs (Equipment, faclm Iy rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Des_ Cost Each QuanIly Req...... u... Cost
Vehicle Expense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 40.00
C
omparlsons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino nla nla
Riverside 100.00 0.00 0.0%
Corona 80.00 (20.00 -20.0%
020
Total ServIce Direct Cost 9296
City-WIde Gen. & Admin.
Rate@16.07% 14.94
Total SeMce CostIUnlt 1n7!ln
Recommended Fee 1nnnn
ReoommendedFeeSlbaldy 790
Current Fee Amount
FeelnCRIase(Decrease) 1nn nn
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentIDivlslon Fund Account User Fee Descriotion Date
City Clerk 001 4901 Yard Sale Permit Fee (New Fee> 3/112009
Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
Nominal fee for issuance of yard sale permn
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
SlralghtL=I Fringe otalDlrect Dept. or D1v. rr etal Burdened Hours by TotalL_
Position BenefitS labor Cost Ovemead labor CostIHr. Posltloo per Unit Cost..
Business Rea. ReDresentative 20.72 6.22 26.94 2.6936 29.63 0.467 13.84
0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 13.84
Material & Rental Costs
DescrlDllon Cost Each QuantJ\y Required UnilCost
0
0
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (EauiPment. facili v rental, part-time labor wlo benefitsl
Description Cost Each Ql81tIly Required UnltCost
0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Permit Fee Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino n/a nla
Redlands 2.50 (12.50 -83.3%
Ontario 3.00 (12.00 -80.0%
Fontana 8.00 (7.00 -46.7%
Yucaipa 2.50 (12.50 -83.3%
021
Total8eMce Dlred Coat 1384
Cily-WIde Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 16.07% 2.22
Total service COst/unit 111M
Recommended Fee 1snn
R-"m~F..SUbtlr:ly 106
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decnllse) 1Snn
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
IDepartmentTDMslon T Fund Account User Fee Description Dele
rDeveloDment Services I 184 4351 Blanket/Combo Permit (New Feel 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidv, and other comments:
A combo permit would combine the excavation permn ($45) and lane closure permit ($45) that contractors typically pull together.
The cost of the combined permit would be $55. The combo permit would allow the contractors to pull one permit saving the City
and contractors time. Develonment Services staff estimates there is a nrooosed revenue loss of $1(} 900.
Dept. or DiY.
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostIHr.
7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16
7.97 34.55 7.60188 42.16
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 44.48
Personnel Costs
Position
Develo ment Services Tech.
En ineerin Assistant 1
Material & Rental Costs
HOLnI by
Position per Urit
1
15%
Total La
Cost ..
38.16
6.32
0.00
0.00
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs IEnuinment, facUn rental, part-time labor w/o benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarlsons to ProDosed Fee
More ILessl than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee er Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 55.00 nla nla
Corona $ 80.00 $ 25.00 45%
Ontario $ 85.00 $ 30.00 55%
Redlands $ 216.00 $ 161.00 293%
Temecula $ 338.00 Annual $ 283.00 515%
Temecula $ 39.00 Monthlv $ 116.00 -29%
Chino $ 177.00 $ 122.00 222%
022
Total Sel'vlce Direct Cost $ 44.48
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate GI 25.86% $ 11.50
TotalServiceCostlUnlt S !;!; !l9
Recommended Fee S !;!;no
Recommended Fee Subsidy S 099
Current Fee Amount S;
Fee Increase (Decrease) S !;!;no
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 184 Account Blanket Inspection Fee ( New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to utility companies to inspect the work covered under the blanket permit, 16 square fee. The recommended
fee is $76.50. This is based on one hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II and .18 hours of a Construction
ISurvey Manager's time. Not all cities have adopted a separate fee, it is included in the permit.
Personnel Costs
Total Burdened
Labor CostlHr.
8.82882 48.96
11.90904 66.04
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Un~ of Service: 60.85
Hours by
Position per Un
1
0.18
Total La
Cost
48.96
11.89
0.00
0.00
Material & Rentsl Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Posta!le
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facllltJ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service:
C omparlsons to P ropose dF ee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost $ 60.85
Jurisdiction Fee [ er Unit Dollars Percentaae City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
San Bernardino $ 76.50 N/A N/A Rate CD 25.86% $ 15.74
Corona Full Cost N/A N/A Total Service Cost/Unit $ 7658
Moreno Vallev $ 15.00 Per Location $ 161.50\i -0.80392157
Ontario Included in )ermit fee N/A N/A Recommended Fee $ 7650
Temecula $ 194.00 $ 117.50 154% Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.08
Chino $ 177.00 $ 100.50 131% Current Fee Amount $
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 7650
O~~
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
DeveloDment Services 183 Various More than 3 Plan Checks (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, or public safety. The recommended fee is $88.50 per hour. This represents review
time for an Engineering Assistant III, the Senior Civil Engineer, the City Engineer, and the Development Services Tech.
The account will vary based on the type of plan being checked.
Personnel Costs
SlralghtTlm
La
24.06
34.11
48.36
62.06
7.22
10.23
14.51
18.62
Oept.orDiv.
OVerhead Labor CostIHr.
31.28 6.88116 38.16
44.34 9.75546 54.10
62.87 13.83096 76.70
80.68 17.74916 98.43
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit D' Service: 70.51
Hours by
Position per Un
0.1
1
0.1
0.05
Total La
Cost pe
3.82
54.10
7.67
4.92
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaae
Total Other costs per Unn a' Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilil' rental, part-time labor w/o benefitsl
DesorIptlon Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unn D' Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Lessl than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost $ 70.51
Jurisdiction Fee ~ er Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
San Bernardino $ 88.50 Per Hour N/A N/A Rate C 25.86% $ 18.23
Temecula $ 93.00 Per Sheet $ 4.50 $ 0.05 Total Service CosUUnlt S 8874
Moreno Valley (Maps) $ 190.00 Per Sheet $ 101.50 $ 1.15
Moreno Vallev Ilmorovementsl $ 248.00 Per Sheet $ 159.50 $ 1.80 Recommended Fee S 8850
Moreno Vallev (Gradingl $ 207.00 Per Sheet $ 118.50 $ 1.34 Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.24
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) S SS 50
024
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Deecrlption Date
DeveloDment Services 188 4780 More than 3 WQMP Reviews (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, public safety, or adequate water quality best practices. The recommended fee is
$99.00 per hour. This represents review time for the NPDES Coordinator, the City Engineer, and the NPDES Customer
Service Rep.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time Frtn Total Clrect Total Burdened Hours by Total La
Position La Benefits Labor Cost Labor CostIHr. Position per Un" Cost pe
NPDES Customer Service Re 17.84 5.35 23.19 5.10224 28.29 0.5 14.15
NPDES Coordinator 37.68 11.30 48.98 10.77648 59.76 1 59.76
Ci En ineer 62.06 18.62 80.68 17.74916 98.43 0.05 4.92
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Un~ of Service: 78.83
Material & Rental Costs
Description CostEaeh Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facm., rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service:
Com par sons to Proposed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Moreno Vallev Preliminarv)
Moreno Valley Basic Final)
Moreno Valley Standard Final)
Moreno Vallev IComclex Final)
More (Less) than S.B.
Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
$ 99.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
$ 321.00 3rd Review $ 221.79 224%
$ 750.00 3rd Review $ 650.79 656%
$1,440.00 3rd Review $ 1,340.79 1351%
$1,824.00 3rd Review $ 1,724.79 1739%
I
I
Total Service Direct Cost $
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
RateG25.86'l6 $
Tolal Service CosUUnlt m
78.83
20.39
QQ 00
Recommended Fee S
Recommended Fee SUbsidy S
QQ?1
(Q 21)
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) 5;
QQ?1
025
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentIDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
DeveloDment Services 188 Account NPDES Business InsDection (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
As required by the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS-4) staff is required inspect all businesses to
insure they are in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The recommended fee is
$148.50. This represents .40 hours of documentation time for the NPDES Customer Service Rep, 2 hours of inspection time for
the NPDES Inspector and .15 hours of review time by the NPDES Coordinator. The permit is a federal requirement and
regulated at the State and regional level.
Personnel Costs
Dept or Div. Hours by Total Labo
Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Un' Cost pe
23.19 5.10224 28.29 0.4 $ 11.32
40.13 8.82882 48.96 2 $ 97.92
0 0.00 $
37.68 11.30 48.98 10.77648 59.76 0.15 $ 8.96
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Un" DI Service: $ 118.20
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Un" 01 Service: $ -
Other Costs IEQulpment, facllit rental, part-tirne labor wlo benefits)
Descriptlon Cost Eadl Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Un" 01 Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
Averaae
Averaae
More (Less) than S.B.
Dollars Percentaae
N/A N/A
$ 22.50 15%
$ 115.16 78%
$ (77.50 -52%
$ 302.50 204%
$ 162.50 109%
, $ 122.50 82%
Total Service Direct Cost $
Clty.Wlde Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 25.86% $
Total Service Cost/Unit $
118.20
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Ontario (Commercial)
Ontario (Industrial)
Redlands
Moreno Valley Industrial)
Moreno Vallev Commercial)
Moreno Valley Restaurant)
Fee per Unit
$ 148.50
$ 171.00
$ 263.66
$ 71.00
$ 451.00
$311.00
$ 271.00
30.57
14877
Recommended Fee 9;
Recommended Fee Subsidy S
148 50
0.27
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Deaease) $
14850
()1J{)
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Description Date
DeveloDment Services 184 Various Public Works Re-Inspection (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The current fee covers one inspection and there are many times when the inspector is called to a site by the contractor and
the contractor is not there or the site is not ready for inspection and then is requested to revis~ the site. The original
inspection fee is based on a percentage of the cost estimate. The recommended fee is $61.50. This represents one hour of
inspection time for a Construction Inspector II. Moreno Valley based their fee on a 4 hour minimum. Not all cities have
established this fee. The account will vary based on the type of inspection being performed.
Personnel Costs
Position
Construction Ins ector II
Dept. or Div. Hours by
Labor Cost Overhead l.IIbor COltIHr. Position per Unit
40.13 8.82882 48.96 1
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Untt of Service:
Material & Rental Costs
Total Labo
Cost pe
48.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
48.96
OesaIptIon Cost Each Quantity Required U nit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Untt of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facllil rental, part-time labor w/o benefits
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Moreno Valley
More (Less) than S.B.
Dollars Percentage
N/A NIA
Each $ 370.50 602%
Total Service Direct Cost $
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rale C 25.86% $
Total Service CostlUnil S
Fee per Unit
$ 61.50
$ 432.00
Recommended Fee 9;
Recommended Fee Subsidy S
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Deaease) !Ii
027
48.96
12.66
61.62
61.50
0.12
6150
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 Various Revisions to Approved Plans (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who request changes to their plans after the plans have been through the
plan check process and have signed mylars. The recommended fee is $142.50 per sheet. This fee represents review time
for a Senior Civil Engineer, a Construction/Survey Manager and documentation time for a Development Services Tech.
Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a consultant.
Pel1lonnel Costs
Straight Tim
Labo
48.36
24.06
41.64
14.51
7.22
12.49
Dept.orDiv.
Overhead
62.87 13.83096
31.28 6.88116
54.13 11.90904
o
o
o
o
Labor C08t1Hr.
76.70
38.16
66.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Position per Un'
1
0.1
0.5
T otalLebo
Cost pe
76.70
3.82
33.02
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unn of Service:
113.54
Material & Rentsl Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaoe
Total Other costs per Unn of Service: 0
Other Coats IEauiDment, facUit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unn of Service:
C
omDarlsons to Proposed Fee
More ILess) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollal1l Percentage
San Bernardino $ 142.50 Per Sheet N/A N/A
Corona $ 625.00 Per Sheet $ 624.60 438%
Temecula $ 241.00 Per Sheet $ 98.50 69%
Chino $ 614.00 $ 471.50 331%
Moreno Vallev (Minor) $ 261.00 Per Sheet $ 118.50 83%
Moreno Valley (Major) $ 269.00 Per Sheet $ 126.50 89%
028
Total Service Direct Cost $ 113.54
Clty.Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate C 25.86% $ 29.36
Total Service CoSWnit !G 147 90
Recommended Fee 9: 14750
Recorrmended Fee Subsidy 9: 040
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) 9: 14750
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentIDlvision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 4782 Certificate of Correction (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who have non-substantive changes to their tract/parcel maps after the maps
have been signed and recorded. The recommended fee is $101.00, minimum one hour. This represent 1 hour of review
time for a Senior Civil Engineer. Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a
consultant. .
Personnel Costs
Position
Senior Civil En ineer
Develo ment Services Tech.
14.51
7.22
62.87
31.28
13.83096
6.88116
o
o
o
o
o
labor CosVHr.
Hours by
Position per Un"
1
0.1
T otallabo
Cost pe
76.70
3.82
0.00
0.00
76.70
38.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per UnK of Service: 80.51
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postace
Total Other costs per UnK of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to Proposed Fee
More ILess) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 101.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
Corona $ 735.00 $ 634.00 628%
Temecula $ 651.00 $ 550.00 545%
Moreno Vallev $ 496.00 $ 395.00 391%
Ontario $ 334.00 $ 233.00 231%
029
Total Service Direct Cost $ 80.51
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate C 25.86% $ 20.82
Total Service COBtIUnit !; 1n1 :14
Recommended Fee !; 101 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 034
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Oecrease) !; 1n1 nO
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
OepartmentIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 4352 Permit Extension (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
There are circumstances when a contractor needs to extend the penn it time frame; staff enters the extension request into
Penn it Plus and verifies with the Construction Manager that the extension is warranted. The recommended fee is $45.00.
This is based on 0.2 hours of review time by the Construction Manager and documentation time by staff.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time
Lebo
24.06
26.58
41.64
7.22
7.97
12.49
DeplorDiv.
Ove"'...
31.28 6.88116
34.55 7.60188
54.13 11.90904
o
o
o
o
Labor Cost/Hr.
38.16
42.16
66.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Position per Un.
0.55
0.05
0.2
Total La
Cost po
20.99
2.11
13.21
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Un~ of Service: 36.30
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaae
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitJ rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Fee per Unit
$ 45.00
More ILess) than S.B.
Dollars Percentaae
Total Service Direct Cost $ 36.30
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate C 25.86% $ 9.39
Total Service CosUUnit !G 4569
Recommended Fee !G 45 nO
Recommended Fee Subsidy S 069
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) S 45 nO
030
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New Inspection for a TUP/CUP Bond Release
Development Services 183 Account (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This is an inspection fee charged to applicants who requested a Temporary Use Permit or a Conditional use Permit. The
inspection is required before the applicant's cash bond can be returned. The recommended fee is $61.50. This represents
1 hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II.
No other cities have established this fee as it is included in the application fee.
Personnel Costs
Position
Construction Ins ector II
Dept. or Div.
Overhead
40.13 8.82882
o
o
o
o
o
o
48.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Position per Un'
1
Total LBbo
Costpe
48.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Un" of Service:
48.96
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total other costs per Un" of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits
Desalptlon Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total other costs per Un" of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More ILessl than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars PercentaQe
San Bernardino 61.50 N/A N/A
031
Total Service Direct Cosl $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 25.86% $ 12.66
Total Service CostlUnit $ R1 R2
Recommended Fee $ R150
Reconvnended Fee Subsidy $ 0.12
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ R150
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentlDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
DeveloDment Services 184 Account Billina Fee (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently staff provide a service to the utility companies by billing them a monthly invoice for permits as no charge. The
recommended fee is $62.04 per invoice. This represents 1.5 hours of review time for an Administrative Assistant.
No other cities have established this fee.
Personnel Costs
Position
Administrative Assistant
Dept. or Dlv.
Overhead
26.94 5.92592
o
o
o
o
o
o
6.22
Hours by
Position per Un
1.5
Total Lebo
Cost
49.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
Labor Cost/Hr.
32.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unn of Service:
49.29
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total other costs per Unn of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitJ rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Desaiption Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Fee per Unit
$ 62.04
More (Less} than S.B.
Dollars Percentaae
N/A N/A
032
Total Service Direct Cost $ 49.29
City.Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rete 0: 25.86% $ 12.75
Total SelVice Cost/Unlt S 6' 04
Recommended Fee S 6'00
Recommended F S8 Subsidy S 004
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increa8e (Decrease) S 6'00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentlDivlslon Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 183 Account TeD InsDection (New Feel 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subeidv, and other comments:
Fee charged to an applicant who is requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant is required to post
a bond to insure all outstanding work is finished. The recommended fee amount is $541.50. This fee is based 2.5 hours
of field review time by the ConstructionlSurvey Manager, 2.5 hours of review time by the City Engineer and 0.5 hours of
documentation time by the Director. No other Cities have established this fee because it is not alwavs standard practice.
Personnel Costs
Position
Construction/Surve Mana er
Ci En ineer
Oevelo ment Services Tech.
Straight Time
lobo
41.64
62.06
24.06
11.90904
17.74916
6.88116
o
o
o
o
12.49
18.62
7.22
54.13
80.68
31.28
Labor CostIHr.
Hours by
Position per Un'
2.5
2.5
0.5
T etal Labo
Costpe
165.10
246.07
19.08
66.04
98.43
38.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
430.25
Material & Rental Costs
Description Coat Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs IEauipment, facillt rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Uniteost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
t P
dF
omparlsons 0 ropose ee
More ILess ) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Oollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 541.50 N/A N/A
033
Total Service Direct Cosl $ 430.25
City-WIde Gen. & Admin.
Rate CD 25.86% $ 111.26
Total Service CostlUnil S 54151
Recommended Fee S 54150
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 001
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) S 54150
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeDartmentIDlvlslDn Fund Account User Fee Descrlotlon Date
Large Family Day Care (9-14 Children> - Initial
Fire 001 4336 Licensino Pre-Insoection Fee. 3/1/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permit. Fee was established in 2008. To remain ODmpliant with State
reaulations has DroOOSed to modliv'insoection fees for care facilities
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fri,go otalDirect Dept.orOiv. 0181 Burdened Hours by ToIalLebo<
Position Lebo - Labor Cost 0._ Labar CostIHr. Position per unit Cost po
Fire Prevention Officer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Material & Rental Costs
DescrIptio' Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
SUDDlies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.60
Other Costs (Eaulpment, faclllt rentel, Dart-time labor wlo benefits!
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnnCost
Vehicle 40.00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der UnIt Dollars Percentaae
N/A
Total SerlIoe OlrectCoet
Cil)'-WId8 GwI. & Acinln.
Rate@14.55%
Total S8fVice CoetlUnit
12360
17.98
141 RR
Recommended Fee
Recommlll'decl F.. Subtldy
Current Fee Amount
Feel~(O_)
Rnnn
9158
14158
.Q1 ~A
034
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Fire 001 4336 Residential - Board and Care 6 or fewer 3/1/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permit. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State
reoulations has DroDosed to modify. insDection fees for care facilities
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
StralghtTlme Fri'go Total Direct Dept.OI"Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Lebo<
Position Lebo< ........ Labor Cost Ovemeed Labor CosIIHr. Position per Unit Cost-
Fire Prevention Officer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Matsrlal & Rental Costs
DescrIption Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
SUDDlies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.60
Other Costs IEQuipment, faclllt rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits I
DescrIption Cost Each Quantity Required UnltCost
Vehicle 40.00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
c
rI
P
dF
omDa sons to roDo.e ee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fse oar Unit Dollars Percentaoe
N/A
Total Service DlrectCost 12360
City-Wide Gen. & AcM1ln.
ReteCl14.55% 17.98
Total Servloe Co.tlUnlt 141 AA
Recommended Fee finnn
Recommended FeeSubsldy 9158
Cumll'ltFeeAmount 14158
Feelncreall8(OecreaIle) -!l1 fiR
035
User Fee Detennination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Police 001 4743 Tow Release 1/612009
Descriotion of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. CVC 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as
GTA are not charged, and can obtain a release 7 days a week. 8am-7pm. All other release can be obtained M-F, 8am-4pm.
The current fee is $215.00.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
StraightL::I F..... Total Direct Dept. or DIv. otal 8uRIened Hours by T'" ,_
Position BeneIIls ~Cos1 DYe"""'" laborCostlHr. Position per Unit Cost-
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.25 7.10
DisDatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.25 9.84
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.33 88.29
Community Service Officer II 21.77 8.95 30.72 3.07 33.79 1.25 42.24
Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 188.47
Material & Rental Costs
De_ Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Police Reoort Fee 0.15 5 0.75
Certified Postaae 3.94 2 7.88
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.88
Other Costs IEQulpment, facllltl rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefitsl
De_ Cost Eaoh QuantilyRequired Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bemardlno 215.00 nta nta
Ontario PD 125.00 (115.00 -47.9%
Corona PD 155.00 185.00 -35.4%
Redlands PD 175.00 (65.00 -27.1%
Pomona PD 100.00 (140.00 -58.3%
Riverside 205.00 110.00 -4.2%
ToIaI Serville DiI1lClColll
209 35
Cily-WkIe Gen. & Amnin.
Rn <<I 15.48%
TotlIl Servk:e C~tlUnlt
32.41
?4175
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
Feelnerelse(Oea'ease)
'4000
175
21500
?5on
036
User Fee Determination
Cost AnalysIs Worksheet
De artment/Dlvlslon
Police
User Fee Descrl tlon
Police Photo raphs 3" x 5"
Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing pollee crime scene photographs, Including the cost of film, film developing. printing
and staff time to process requests. Comparisons with other cnies are difficult because of the services provided
are different. There has not been a fee Increase since 2006.
Personnel Costs I Labor Rates
Straight TIme Fr1nge TotalDlroct Oept.orDIv. Total Burdened H.... by T~~
Position IAbo< Benefits lllborCost 0verIleacl Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Forensic Soecialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32
Material & Rental Costs
De_ I Cost Eoch QuantlIyRequlred Unit Cost
Film develoDina & printina 0.27 1 0.27
=
Total other costs per Unit of Service: 0.27
Other Costs fEauloment, facllltv rental. Dart-time labor wlo benents)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
c
ri
P
dF
omDa sons to roDose ee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bemardino 26.00 I nla nla
San Bernardino Sheriff 2.00 I 25.00 -92.6%
Riverside PD 9.00 CD no reDrints 18.00 -66.7%
Ontario PO 15.00 CD no reDrints 12.00 -44.4%
Fontana PD 32.00 CD no reDrints 5.00 18.5%
Chino PD 35.00 CO + 25 cents Der 8.00 29.6%
I
TotlllSflrviceDirectCOlt 23.59
Cil)<-WIde Gen. & Admin.
Rite 0 15.-45% 3.65
Total Serviee COlt/Unit " '4
Recommended Fee ?7nn
RecornmendlldFeeSublidy 024
Current fee Amount 2600
FeelnCAllle(OeereaH) 1 nn
037
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtment/Dlvlslon
Police
User Fee Descrl tlon
Police Photographs 5" x 7"
Descrlotion of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, including the cost of film, film developing, printing
and staff time to process requests. City comparisons are difficuR because of different services provided
There has not been a fee increase since 2006.
Personnel Costs I Labor Kates
StraighlT1me Fmge oIalOi<ect Dept. or DIv otaI Burdened H.... by TotalLaboo'
Position ..- ....... Labor Cost 0_ Labor CostIHr. Position per Unn Cost oer
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Forensic Specialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32
Material & Rental Costs
Descrlption Icosl Each QuantltyReq"'" Unit Cost
Film develoDina & Drinting 2.95 1 2.95
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2.95
Other Costs IEQulpment facilitv rental, part-time labor wlo benefitsl
De_ Cost Each Quant!ty ROQ~red UnllCost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
P
dF
ompansons to roD0S81 ee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino I 29.50 nla nla
San Bemardino Sheriff 6.00 24.00 -80.0%
Riverside PD 9.00 CD 21.00 -70.0%
Ontario PD 15.00 CD 15.00 -50.0%
Fontana PD 32.00 CD 2.00 6.7%
Chino PD 35.00 CD 5.00 16.7%
ToIlllSllrviceDirectCOlt 26.27
CIl)'-WIde Gen. & AdmIn.
RMe CD 15.48% 4.07
TotlllSflrvicecostlUnit :In:l:l
Recommended Fee :lnon
~F..Subo.kly 033
Current F.. Amount 2950
FeelncreIM(Deere..e) nfin
038
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Descrlotion Date
Police 001 4741 Police Photographs 8" x 10" 3/1712008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, including the cost of film, film developing, printing
and staff time to process requests. There has not been a fee increase since 2006.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe hootsl Direct Oept.orDIv. 0181 Burdened Hours by T...' Labar
Position Labar - Labor Cost Ovemead Labor ColtlHr. Position per Unit Coot,,",
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Forensic Specialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32
Material & Rental Costs
Description ICost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Film developinQ & printino 6.00 1 6.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 6.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental part-time labor w/o benefits)
Desa1ptlon COlt Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other oosts per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bemardino 33.00 nla nla
San Semardino Sheriff 6.00 27.50 -82.1%
Riverside PD 9.00 CD 24.50 -73.1%
Ontario PD 15.00 CD 18.50 -55.2%
Fontana PD 32.00 CD (1.50 -4.5%
Chino PD 35.00 CD 1.50 4.5%
TotelServIceDlrectCoat 2932
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rete G 15.48% 4.54
Total SarviceCostlUnit 3385
Recommended Fee :l:l5n
Recornmencied Fee SubMty 035
Current Fee Amount 3300
Feelncrea,. (DecreaH) n 5n
039
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtment/Dlvlslon
Police
Descriotion of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
For reproduction of video cassette tapes (VHS).
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
-~~:1 Fringe otatDlred Dept. or Div. 0181 BlIdened Holftby TolalLabor
Position - L.aborCost ~ Labor CostIHr. P08it1on per Unit CostDOl'
Police Detective 45.67 21.02 66.69 6.67 73.36 0.5 36.68
Police Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.25 20.60
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 57.28
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefttsl
DescrIption Coat Each Quontlty Requlnod Unit Colt
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
C
P
edF
ompansons to ropos ee
More (Less) than S.1l
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 17.50 48.50 -73.5%
Riverside 50.00 110minl $1.75 add'l 16.00 -24.2%
Ontario 25.00 41.00 -62.1%
Fontana 32.00 34.00 -51.5%
TotIil SeMce DIrect Cost 57.28
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 15.48% 8.87
Total service COst/Unit l1li15
Recommended Fee 66nn
R~F-.SUbslcly 015
CUl1'entF..Amount 6300
F.. IneAle.. (Deer....) :1 nn
040
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentlDivlsion
Police
Description of service, demand, subsidv, and other comments:
Fee for reproducin9 Police Dispatch logs and CAD printouts
The fees have not bsen increased since 2006.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe otaI Direct Dept. orDlv. Total Burdened H.....by Totallabo
Position Lab" Beneflts Labor Cost Ovemead LaborCostlHr. Position per Uni Costpe
DisDatch Suoervisor 30.87 12.27 43.14 4.31 47.45 1.25 59.32
Police Communications Mgr 35.65 14.98 50.83 5.06 55.91 0.25 13.98
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 73.30
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each QUBntity Required Unit Coat
Audio Tape 1.00 1 1.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.00
Other Costs (Eaulpment, facllltv rental, Dart-time labor wlo bsnefltal
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Coat
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Lass) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino 80.00 nta nta
Riverside PD 300.00 215.00 253%
TCUl5en/IceDlredCOlt 7430
City-WIde Gen. & Admin.
~O15.-48% 11.50
TCUl SeMce CoIWnlt R~Rn
Recommended Fee R~nn
_....-FM~ 08n
CummI Fee Amount 8000
F..IIICIeaH(OeeMlIae) ~nn
041
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De artment/Dlvislon
Police
Description of service, demand, subsidv, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false burglary alarm calls. Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines incurred for permitted
locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1st to 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th.9th false alann will be $90 and the 10th and subseauent false alann $175.
Fees have not been increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fri'GO otalDlrect Dept. or Dlv. otaI Bl.I'dened Hours by Total La"'"
Position Labo Benefitll Labor Coot Ovemead Labor CostIHr. Position per Unit Coot...
Disnatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.5 19.28
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 0.5 33.19
Semeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.25 20.60
Senior Office Assistant 19.84 7.96 27.80 2.78 30.58 0.33 10.09
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 83.16
Material & Rental Costs
Descrlplfon Coot Each Oua"">' Required Unit Cost
Postane 0.42 1 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.42
Other Costs IEauloment, facilil rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to ProDosed Fee
Fee D8I' Unit More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Dollars Percente<
SBPD 75.00 nla nla
Riverside PD Fine #5 75.00 0.00 0.0%
Pomona PD #5 220.00 145.00 193.3%
NewDort Beach PD - Fine #5 125.00 50.00 66.7%
Irvine PD #5 150.00 75.00 100.0%
Ontario #5 150.00 75.00 100.0%
Huntinnton Beach #5 200 125.00 166.7%
e
042
TotalServiceOirectCosl 83.58
City-WIde Gen. & Admin.
Rate@15.48% 12.94
Total $ervlceCostlUnlt AIHi?
Recommended Fee 7!inn
Recommended Fee Subsidy 2152
Current Fee Amoool 50.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) ?!inn
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Acc:ount User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4747 False Robbery Alarm Fines 1/6/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false robbery alarm calls. Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines incurred for permitted
locations until frfth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1st to 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th-6th false alann will be $250. 7th-9th will be $300 and the 10th and
subsequent false alarm $350. Fees have not been increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct DepL or Div. Total Burden.. Hours by Total Labo
Position Lobo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Un Cost po
OisDatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.75 28.92
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.67 110.86
Sergeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20
Senior Office Assistant 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 190.35
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each antlty Required Unit Cost
Postaae 0.42 0.42
Total Other oosts per Unit of Service: 0.42
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefitsl
Description Cost Each antily Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percenta~
SBPD 175.00 nla n/a
Riverside PO Fine #5 300.00 100.00 50.0%
Newoort PO #5 125.00 (75.00 -37.5%
Irvine #5 150.00 (50.00 -25.0%
Ontario #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
Huntington Beach #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
04~j
e
T etal Service Direct Cost 190.77
C1ty.Wlde Gen. & Admin.
Rate@15.48% 29.53
Total Service CosVUnlt ??o 30
Recommended Fee ?On 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 2030
Current Fee Amount 125.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) 7500
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeoartmentlDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Descrlotlon Date
Police 001 4743 Traffic Citation Sian-off fees 3/3/2009
Descrl tlon of service, demand, subsl , and other comments:
Police Officers issue traffic citations to the motoring public who operate vehicles with mechanical violations. These violations
must be corrected and signed off by police officers prior to the public contacting the court. Currently the Police Department
does not cha e a fee for ersonnel to ins ct vehicles, veri corrections have been made and si n off the citation.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe otalDlrecl Oepl or Div. .....- Hours by Total La""
Position Lobo< ........ La"" Cost eve..... Labor CostlHr. Position per Un' Cost per
Community Service Officer I 22.74 9.13 31.87 1.75 33.62 0.33 11.09
Lieutenant - Watch Commander 62.8673 27.68 90.55 4.75 95.30 0.1 9.53
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 20.62
Material & Rental Costs
Descrlption Cost Each Quantity Required Uniteost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs IEouioment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
De_ Cost Each Quantity Required uniteost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
P
omoansons to rooosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino nla nla
Ontario PD 0.0%
Corona PD 20.00 -100.0%
Redlands PD 20.00 -100.0%
Pomona PD 20.00 -100.0%
Total 5ervic8 Dir8cl:Cod 2062
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
R.w CD 10.75% 2.22
TotaISerYil;eeo.tlUnit ??R4
Recommended Fee ?nnn
Recommended Fee Subsidy 284
Current Fee Amount nnn
Feelncrelse (0ectuIe) ?nnn
04'1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Public Services 132 4820 Sewer Lateral Capping Fee 2/25/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently, staff charges an applicant who is requesting sewer lateral capping services $500, the cost of the contractor only.
To recover the costs of City personnel needed to inspect the sewer lateral capping services, Public Services is proposing to
increase the fee by $350.
Personnel Costs
30.97
100
17
Frlnge TotalOlrect
Be Labor Cost
10.84 41.81
35.00 135.00
5.95 22.95
Oept. or Dlv.
Overhead
4.18095
13.5
2.295
o
o
o
o
Labor CostIHr.
45.99
148.50
25.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Position per Un
2
1
0.25
Total Labo
Cost pe
91.98
148.50
6.31
Position
Sewer Maintenance Su ervisor
Ins ector Costs
IW Customer Service Re .
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
246.79
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Juantlty Required Unit Cost
Total Other cosls per Unit Df Service:
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitv rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefitsl
Description Cost Each ::tuantily Required Unit Cost
Contractor Cost 500.00 1 500
Fleet Charoes Vehicle 539 15.5 3 46.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 546.50
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost $ 793.29
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
San Bernardino N/A N/A N/A Rate @25.86% $ 205.15
Riverside InsDection onlv $300 $148.50 N/A Total Service CostlUnit !Ii 998 44
Rialto Inspection only $157 $148.50 N/A
Redlands InsDection onlv $282 $148.50 N/A Recommended Fee !Ii 85n nn
Loma Linda N/A N/A N/A Recorrmended Fee Subsidy !Ii 14844
Moreno Valley N/A N/A N/A Current Fee Amount !Ii 500.00
Ontario N/A N/A N/A Fee Increase (Decrease) !Ii 350 00
045
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeoartrnentlDivislon Fund Account User Fee Description Dete
Public Services 132 4820 Sewer LaterallnsDection Fee 2/24/2009
Description of service, demand, sUbsidv, and other comments:
Currently, staff charges $50.00 for sewer lateral inspection services. Staff recommends that the fee be increased by
an additional $50.00 for a total of $100.00 per inspection.
Personnel Costs
Hours by
Labor CostIHr. osition per Un
o 0.00 1
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
Position
Ins ector Costs
Material & Rental Costs
Total Labo
Costpe
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
Description Cost Each entity Required Unit Cost
Total Other ODSts per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs IEnulnment, facilit rental, Dart.tlme labor w/o benefitsl
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarlsons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino N/A N/A N/A
Riverside N/A N/A N/A
Rlalto N/A N/A N/A
Corona N/A N/A N/A
Loma Linda N/A N/A N/A
Moreno VaUev N/A N/A N/A
Ontario N/A N/A N/A
046
Total Service Direct Cost $ 100.00
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@ 25.86% $ 25.86
Tolal Service CosWnit $ 1?!illfl
Recommended Fee $ 1nnnn
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 2586
Current Fee Amount $ 5000
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ !i000
Attachment B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 16.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
1 WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has an ongoing and serious problem of
businesses posting signs on public property creating a public nuisance and blight
2 throughout the City; and
3
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino find that it
is necessary to hold owners and/or businesses that Rrofit from these unauthorized
signs responsible for the cost of removal of these una ized signs.
4
5
6
NOW THERFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMM
BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
7
Section 1.
8
9
10
16.18.010
11 16.18.020
12 16.18.030
16.18.040
13 16.18.050
14
15
16
Forth
and
The
inten
applicab
the plural
mean feminin
erwise apparent from context, words
meanings hereinafter designated.
eference purposes only and are not
f definitions set forth in federal, state or other
s used in this chapter in the singular may include
he singular. Use of the masculine shall also
17
18
19
20
21
A.
ernardino Municipal Code.
22
B. "Development Code" means Title 19 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code.
23
C. "Director" means the Director of Code Enforcement or his/her designee.
24
25
D. "Responsible party" means the owner or lessee of property used for a
commercial activity or event; or the sponsor or promoter of a sporting event,
concert, theatrical performance, or similar activity or event. Any information
that appears on a sign that is removed may be used to establish that the
26
27
28
1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 16.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
1 person or venue listed on the sign is the actual responsible party including, but
not limited to, information identifying a person or corporate identity.
2
3
E. "Unauthorized sign" means any notice, writing of letters, words or numerals,
pictorial presentation, illustrations or decorations, emblems or devices, symbols
or trademarks, flags, banners or pennants, graphic announcement, posters,
pictures or any item used to advertise in any er businesses, services or
events at some location other than that upo the sign is located.
4
5
6
7
16.18.020 Prohibitions.
8
r maintain or cause
any unauthorized
rights-of-ways,
or property
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ity employees and/or City contractors
esponsible party. The cost of removal
ayor and Common Council.
16
17
18
t to the City and subject to all remedies for debt
19
20
21
y be enforced or punished in any manner prescribed by
law, including but not Ii ited to issuance of administrative citations pursuant to
Chapter 9.92, through issuance of administrative civil penalties pursuant to Chapter
9.93, or through any other process or procedure established or allowed by this code or
applicable law.
22
23
24
25
Section 2. In the event that any provision of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or
26 any application thereof to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be
27
28
2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 16.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
1
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or ineffective by any court of competent
jurisdiction on its face or as applied, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or any application thereof
to any person or circumstance or of said provision as applied to any other person or
circumstance. It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent of the City that this
Ordinance would have been adopted had such unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective
provision not been included herein.
2
3
4
5
6 1/1
1/1
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 16.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
1
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the _ day of ,2009, by the following vote, to wit
2
3 COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES
4
ESTRADA
5
6 BAXTER
7 BRINKER
8 VACANT
9 KELLEY
10
JOHNSON
11
MC CAMMACK
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 JAMES F. PENM
21 City Attorney
22
23 By:
24
25
26
27
28
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
,2009.
PATRICK J. MORRIS, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
4
Attachment C
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 5.68 OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING YARD
SALES.
1
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino finds that there is a proliferation of
unregulated yard sales which create a public nuisance and blight throughout the City;
and
2
3
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino find that it
is necessary to require permits for those resident desiring to hold a yard sale in order
to facilitate regulation of such sales.
4
5
6
NOW THERFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMM
BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
7
8
Section 1.
Chapter 5.68 of Title 5 i
9
10
5.68.010 Definitions.
11 5.68.020 Permit required.
12 5.68.030 Permit Fee.
5.68.040 Permit -
13 5.68.050 Frequ
5.68.060 Dis
14 5.68.070 SIgns.
15 5.68.080 mpti
5.68.0
16
17
18
19
A. "Yar
premis
of person
or called "g
es, open to the public, conducted from or on a
ial or obile home zone for the purpose of disposing
uding, but not limited to, all sales entitled, advertised
"yard," "porch," "flea market" or "rummage" sale.
20
21
22
B. "Personal prope eans property which is owned, utilized or maintained by
an individual or members of a residence or family and acquired in the normal
course of living in or maintaining a residence. It does not include merchandise
which was purchased for resale or obtained on consignment.
23
24
5.68.020 Permit required.
25
26
It is unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to conduct or carry on a yard sale
within the city without having first obtained a permit from the City's City Clerk.
27
28
1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 5.68 OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING YARD
SALES.
1
5.68.030 Permit Fee.
2
The fee for such permit shall be set by separate resolution of the Mayor and Common
Council.
3
4
5.68.040 Permit - Posting.
5
It is unlawful for any permittee to conduct a ya
unless a valid permit is posted in a prominent, v'
all times that the sale is in progress.
as provided in this chapter
cation on the premises during
6
7
5.68.050 Frequency and Hours.
8
9
An individual or household shall be Ii
each sale shall be limited to three cons
sales. Yard sales may be co cted only
eight (8) p.m.
lendar year and
o consecutive
7) a.m. and
10
11
12
13 Sale goods may
arranged so th
14 at all times dun
15 between the hours
16
17 Three
18 advertisl
sale. The
19 Such sign m
removed imme
20
21 5.68.080 Exemption
d all sale goods shall be
e access for inspection
layed on the days of and
ermitted n exceeding four square feet in area
shall be displayed only during the period of the
on the property where such sale is located.
r (24) hours prior to the sale and must be
22
The provisions of this c apter shall not apply to the following:
23
A. Any bona fide charitable, educational or cultural institution or organization,
when the proceeds from the sale are used directly for charitable,
educational or cultural purposes; or
24
25
B. Persons selling goods pursuant to the order of any court of competent
26 jurisdiction.
27
28
2
A violation of this chapter may be enforced or punished in any manner prescribed by
law, including but not limited to issuance of administrative citations pursuant to
Chapter 9.92, through issuance of administrative civil enalties pursuant to Chapter
9.93, or through any other process or procedure esta d or allowed by this code or
applicable law.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 5.68 OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING YARD
SALES.
1
2
5.68.090 Violation - Penalty.
3
4
5
6
Section 2. In the event that any provision of
7 any application thereof to any person or .
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid
8 jurisdiction on its face or as applied,
9 remaining provisions of this Ordinance,
to any person or circumstance or of sai
10 circumstance. It is hereby d red to be
Ordinance would have been a had suc
11 provision not been included her
nce, or any part thereof, or
r any reason held to be
court of competent
the validity of the
plication thereof
ther person or
ity that th is
ineffective
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 5.68 OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING YARD
SALES.
1
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the _ day of , 2009, by the following vote, to wit:
2
3
COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES
4
ESTRADA
5
6 BAXTER
7 BRINKER
8 VACANT
9 KELLEY
10
JOHNSON
11
MC CAMMACK
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
JAMES F. PENMAN
21 City Attorney
22
23 By:
24
25
26
27
28
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
,2009.
PATRICK J. MORRIS, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
4