HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-01-2008 Minutes
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Website: www.sbcity.org
Mayor Patrick J. Morris
Council Members:
Esther Estroikl
Dennis J. Baxter
Tobin Brinker
4h Ward -VacatU
Chas Kelley
Rikke Van Johnson
Wem!Y McCommack
~
MINUTES
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 1, 2008
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The joint regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council and Community
Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino was called to order by
Mayor/Chairman Morris at 1:37 p.m., Monday, December 1, 2008, in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
Roll Call
Present: Mayor/Chairman Morris; Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Baxter,
Johnson, McCammack; City Attorney Penman, Interim City Manager
Weinberg, City Clerk Clark.
Absent: Council Members/Commissioners Brinker, Kelley.
Vacant: Fourth Ward
Council Member/Commissioner Kelley arrived at 2:03 p.m.
Council Member/Commissioner Brinker arrived at 3:18 p.m.
1
12/011200S
1. Closed Session
Pursuant to Government Code Section(s):
A. Conference with legal counsel - eXlstmg litigation - pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a):
Marl!;aret Spears v. City of San Bernardino, et al. - San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. CIVSS 802927;
Desrochers, Michael & Lowes, Steve v. City, et al. - San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. CIVSS 708367 and United States District Court
Case No. EDCV 06-1408 VAP (JCRx).
B. Conference with legal counsel - anticipated litigation - significant
exposure to litigation - pursuant to subdivision (b) (1), (2), (3) (A-F) of
Government Code Section 54956.9:
Public Counsel Law Center/Human Potential Community LLC v. City of
San Bernardino
Inland Communities Corp. v. City of San Bernardino (Paradise Hills)
Two (2) cases
California Aviation Services, Inc. v. City of San Bernardino
City v. Gage Canal
C. Conference with legal counsel - anticipated litigation - initiation of
litigation - pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code Section
54956.9:
City of San Bernardino v. California State University
D. Closed Session - personnel - pursuant to Government Code Section
54957:
Director of Code Compliance
E. Closed session with Chief of Police on matters posing a threat to the
security of public buildings or threat to the public's right of access to
public services or public facilities - pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.
F. Conference with labor negotiator - pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6.
2
12/0 I/200S
G. Conference with real property negotiator - pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8:
1.
Property Address:
450 North "E" Street
APN: 0134-121-24
Negotiating Parties:
Emil A. Marzullo, Interim Executive
Director, on behalf of the
Redevelopment Agency, Scott Bailey
on behalf of CinemaStar Luxury
Theaters, Inc.
Under Negotiation:
Terms and conditions of lease and
occupancy arrangements.
2.
Property Address:
450 North "E" Street
APN: 0134-121-24
Negotiating Parties:
Emil A. Marzullo, Interim Executive
Director, on behalf of the
Redevelopment Agency, and
Moctesuma Esparza, CEO and
Founder on behalf of Maya Cinemas.
Under Negotiation:
Purchase price, terms and conditions.
City Attorney Penman announced that Agenda Item No. 1G would be continued
to December 15, 2008, to be discussed in both closed and open sessions, and that
the following additional cases would be discussed in closed session:
Under Agenda Item No. lA, existing litigation:
Richard "Scott" Moss, et aI. v. City of San Bernardino, et al. - United
States District Court Case No. EDCV 07-01027 SGL (Opx);
Under Agenda Item No. 1B, significant exposure to litigation, the Legislative
Review Committee Agenda for December 2,2008.
Reading of Resolutions & Ordinances
Deputy City Clerk Sutherland read into the record the titles of all the resolutions and
ordinances on the regular agenda of the Mayor and Common Council and Community
Development Commission.
3
12/0112008
Moment of Silence
Mayor Morris extended condolences to the families and requested a moment of silence in
memory of Alfred Navor, Robert "Bob" Clark, Josh C. Carter, Jr., Tula Davis, and
Russ Lackner.
Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance
The invocation was given by Reverend Arul lrudayaraj, Chaplain at San Bernardino
Community Hospital. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Aliyah Sanchez, a fifth grade
student at Ramona Alessandro School.
2. Appointments
There were no commission appointments.
3. Presentations
There were no presentations.
4. Announcements
Announcements were made by the Mayor, members of the Common Council,
elected officials, and a representative from the Chamber of Commerce regarding
various civic, community, and chamber events and activities.
5. Waive Full Reading of Resolutions & Ordinances
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that full reading of the resolutions and ordinances
on the regular agenda of the Mayor and Common Council and Community
Development Commission, be waived. The motion carried unanimously with
the Fourth Ward vacant.
6. Council Minutes
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that the minutes of the following meeting(s) of
the Mayor and Common Council/Community Development Commission of the
City of San Bernardino be approved as submitted in typewritten form:
November 3,2008. The motion carried unanimously with the Fourth Ward
vacant.
4
1210112008
7. Claims & Payroll
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that the claims and payroll and the authorization
to issue warrants as listed in the memorandum dated November 19, 2008, from
Barbara Pachon, Director of Finance, be approved. The motion carried
unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
8. Personnel Actions
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that the personnel actions, as submitted by the
Chief Examiner, dated November 21, 2008, in accordance with Civil Service
rules and Personnel policies adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the
City of San Bernardino, be approved and ratified. The motion carried
unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
9. RES. 2008-438 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino accepting the resignation of Fourth Ward Council
Member, Neil Derry; calling a special election in the Fourth Ward of the City
for March 17, 2009 to fill the vacant council seat in said ward, calling the
special election to be conducted wholly by mail ballots; and other related
matters.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No.
2008-438 was adopted unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
10. Request for waiver of fees - YMCA Children's Christmas Parade -
December 6, 2008
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that the request for a waiver of fees in the amount
of $7,145 for department, personnel and equipment costs associated with the 31"
Annual YMCA Children's Christmas Parade scheduled for December 6, 2008 be
approved; and that $7,145 be transferred from the Civic and Promotion Fund into
various City departmental accounts as listed in the staff report from the City
Manager, dated November 5, 2008, to recover the costs incurred in assisting with
the parade. The motion carried unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
5
12101/2008
11. ORD. MC-1291 - An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino amending
Chapter 19.10 (Special Purpose Districts) of the San Bernardino Municipal
Code (Development Code) related to the University Hills Specific Plan.
FINAL READING (Continued from November 17,2008)
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that said ordinance be adopted. Ordinance No.
MC-I291 was adopted unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
12. RES. 2008-439 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino awarding a contract to AK Engineering for traffic signal
modifications at Waterman Avenue and Parkdale Drive (TC05-07) per
Project Plan No. 11628.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No.
2008-439 was adopted unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
13. RES. 2008-440 - A Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino declaring its intention to authorize the annexation of
territory generally located between Palm Avenue and Olive Avenue
southwesterly of Belmont Avenue (Annexation No. 7) to Community Facilities
District No. 1033, and adopting an annexation map showing the territory of
Annexation No.7.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that the Director of Development Services and
the City Clerk be authorized to proceed under Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2,
Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, as amended, with
Community Facilities District No. 1033 Annexation No.7 for property consisting
of a commercial development (CUP No. 07-31, First Assembly of God Church),
located on the southwesterly side of Belmont A venue southeasterly of Palm
Avenue (APN 0261-151-07); and that said resolution be adopted. The motion
carried and Resolution No. 2008-440 was adopted unanimously with the
Fourth Ward vacant.
14. RES. 2008-441 - Resolution of the City of San Bernardino canceling a
Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act Contract) for property
located at 783 North Mountain View Avenue.
City Attorney Penman abstained because the subject property is owned by the San
Bernardino City Unified School District and his wife is a member of the Board of
Trustees. He advised that Mr. Sabo had reviewed and signed the resolution.
6
12/01/2008
Council Member/Commissioner McCarnmack abstained due to the fact that the
school district is one of her business clients.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No.
2008-441 was adopted. Ayes: Estrada, Baxter, Brinker, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Abstentions: McCammack. Vacant: Fourth Ward.
15. 2008 and 2009 Holiday Closure Days
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that the Mayor and Common Council authorize
the closure of City Hall on Friday, December 26, 2008 and Friday, January 2,
2009 and require affected employees to take off those days, using their own
accrued leave. The motion carried unanimously with the Fourth Ward
vacant.
16. RES. 2008-442 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino authorizing the City Manager to submit the Juvenile
Accountability Block Grant (JABG) Program Gang Intervention Grant and
execute the Grant Agreement with the Corrections Standards Authority.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No.
2008-442 was adopted unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
17. RES. 2008-443 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City
of San Bernardino ratifying the submittal of two FY 2007-08 COPS
Technology Grant applications and authorizing the Police Department to
administer the awarded grant funds in accordance with the grant expenditure
plans.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No.
2008-443 was adopted unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
18. RES. 2008-444 - Resolution of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the
purchase of digital voice recorders and supporting hardware and software for
the Police Department.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No.
2008-444 was adopted unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
7
12/01/2008
19. RES. 2008-445 - A Resolution authorizing the execution of an agreement and
issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $73,248.61 to Cook Equipment
Company pursuant to Section 3.04.0IO-B3 of the Municipal Code for a JCB
3CX14 4WD backhoe/loader to be utilized by the Public Services Department
Street Division Sewer Maintenance crew.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Baxter, that said resolution be adopted; and that the
Director of Finance be authorized to amend the FY 2008/09 Budget by
transferring $73,300 from Account No. 132-431-5704 (Miscellaneous
Equipment), to Account No. 132-431-5701 (Motor Vehicles). The motion
carried and Resolution No. 2008-445 was adopted unanimously with the
Fourth Ward vacant.
20. Appeal hearing - Variance No. 08-01 (Appeal No. 08-03) - An appeal of the
Planning Commission's denial of a variance to permit construction of one
double-face illuminated pole sign for the business located at 285 East 9th
Street at the southwest comer of 9th Street and Waterman Avenue in the
CG-l, Commercial General, land use district.
Mayor/Chairman Morris opened the hearing.
Terry Rahhal, Deputy Director/City Planner, Development Services Department,
stated that this request was for an additional free-standing pole sign at the
southwest corner of 9th Street and Waterman Avenue. She stated that the project
site is the Warehouse Shoe Sale store and noted that additional site photos and an
aerial view had been distributed to the Council.
Warehouse Shoe Sale occupied the site and obtained sign permits and installed
signage on the building in the summer of 2007. At that time, they also proposed
installation of the new free-standing pole sign directly on the corner to identify
Warehouse Shoe Sale. That particular sign was not permitted based on the fact
that the site is part of a shopping center that is located on the southwest corner of
9th Street and Waterman Avenue, anchored by Fiesta Foods.
The shopping center has two free-standing shopping center identification signs-
one on Waterman Avenue and one on 9th Street. The Fiesta Foods shopping
center development plans were approved in 1981 and included the site directly at
the corner of 9th and Waterman where plans were approved separately for a 7,920
square foot shoe store in 1982.
Ms. Rahhal stated that the plans for this building, which is currently occupied by
Warehouse Shoe Sale, specifically identified the building as part of the greater
8
12/0 I/2008
shopping center and acknowledged the reciprocal parking and access easements as
it was one of three parcels comprising the existing shopping center.
San Pedro Sign Company is the applicant in this case and applied on behalf of
Warehouse Shoe Sale for a variance from the shopping center sign regulations in
order to request an additional free-standing sign to identify Warehouse Shoe Sale.
The variance was requested on the basis that Warehouse Shoe Sale is not
affiliated with Fiesta Foods and is on a separate parcel, not under the same
ownership, and also is not part of the Fiesta Foods Management.
Ms. Rahhal stated that the Planning Commission considered the variance on June
17, 2008, and first made recommendations to the applicant to seek identification
on the existing shopping center signs. The applicant at that time stated that either
the space would not be made available to them or that it would not suit the needs
of Warehouse Shoe Sale. The findings that were made by the Planning
Commission on a unanimous vote did not support approval of the variance and
they denied Variance No. 08-01, based on the fact that there were no unique
circumstances at this site or characteristics about the project site that would
warrant granting a variance as requested.
Since the action of the Planning Commission, some additional small signs have
been added to the building and some wall panels depicting sports and/or sporting
events have been added also that do a good job of attracting attention to the
building. However, the applicant still seeks approval of a variance to install a 25
foot pole sign in addition to this signage on the southwest corner of 9th Street and
Waterman Avenue.
Ms. Rahhal stated that it was staff's recommendation that the Mayor and
Common Council deny this appeal and uphold the action of the Planning
Commission to deny Variance No. 08-01, based on the Findings of Fact
contained in the Planning Commission staff report.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2000-279, City Clerk Clark administered an oath to
the following individual that he would provide true and honest testimony:
Gus Navarro, President of San Pedro Electric Sign Company, 701 Lakme
Avenue, Wilmington, CA, stated that this lot is independent from the shopping
center, which has three separate parcels and three different owners. He stated
that this parcel has more than enough frontage to qualify for a pole sign. The
owners signed the lease and upon applying for the permit from the City of San
Bernardino they were denied the permit because they were told that it was part of
the shopping center. Mr. Navarro stated that he went to the County of San
Bernardino and there are no records indicating that it was part of the shopping
center-it's a totally separate parcel. Under the City of San Bernardino's
9
12/0 I/200S
Municipal Code, a pole sign is allowed because they have the proper amount of
frontages and there is enough area to install a pole sign.
Deputy City Attorney Empefio stated that this parcel was part of the project in
1981 and was reviewed again in 1982, wherein the specific development of this
parcel was proposed and was approved in a review of plans with applications for
signage, which included the wall signs that could be placed on the building. He
stated that the existing pole signs were abandoned from the site as a whole in
1981.
Mr. Empefio stated that this parcel could not stand alone in a separate application
for the pole sign that is being requested. He advised the Mayor and Common
Council that under Section 19.72.050 of the City's Municipal Code, six findings
have to be made to support the variance. He cited one finding in particular that
needed to be made by the Council that states: "There are special circumstances
applicable to the property including size, shape, topography, location, or
surroundings, the strict application of this Development Code deprives such
property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under
identical land use district classifications. "
Mr. Empefio stated that as noted on page 4 of the Planning Commission staff
report dated June 17, 2008, "There are no special circumstances applicable to this
property looking at the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings. The
subject site is flat, rectangular, fully developed and located at a major
intersection. The building is located on the corner, with excellent visibility from
Waterman Avenue and 9th Street. There are no disadvantages associated with the
site that would require additional signage to have the same exposure as other
businesses in the vicinity or in the CG-l land use district." Mr. Empefio added
that it was staff's belief that the findings could not be made to support this
variance.
Council Member/Commissioner McCarnmack asked staff to explain why this
parcel is not being considered a stand-alone parcel.
Ms. Rahhal stated that the sign code addresses two circumstances. One would be
a shopping center with multiple buildings or a large multi-tenant building and
typically those centers are approved under a conditional use permit, or a similar
process, and it involves making sure there is adequate parking, access, and
signage, and many time those are shared. She stated that a stand-alone building is
one that is on its own, on a separate parcel, for which they have separate sign
codes that would apply. This parcel is a separate parcel; however, that is not
unusual because very often in a shopping center there are several parcels where
the ownership is split up several ways and there may even be pads reserved for
future purchase and development, but the overall shopping center plan would
10
12/OI/200S
already be approved for those separate pads, which is what happened in 1981.
There was an overall plan for the shopping center that included several parcels
and this particular parcel was called out as a pad that would support the certain
size of building that would come in for separate plans, but would need to be
consistent with the shopping center plan, and that is what happened in 1982.
Mr. Navarro stated that he researched this at the County of San Bernardino and
this has always been a separate parcel and there were no covenants and
agreements. Usually when a center gives up its rights on something, there are
usually covenants and agreements or some kind of affidavit that is notarized and
filed with the County in case it comes up in the future. He stated that he has
never seen any documentation that has given up the sign rights for this corner
building. He stated that under the City's Municipal Code, they have two
frontages, one on Waterman and one on 9th Street, that qualifies them to have a
pole sign.
Mr. Empefio stated that often there are recorded documents-reciprocal parking
easements as well as reciprocal access easements for this shopping center. He
stated that he has also seen recorded documents by way of recorded agreements
where signage is also agreed to and certain signs on the property have display
rights vested with property owners of certain parcels. If that didn't occur here,
then that was the property owner's choice at that time of not recording that
document. But, for any business owner who comes into a shopping center, those
reciprocal parking and access agreements are very important, as well as signage
agreements. This property may be able to try to assert a right by contract to the
other parcel owner in terms of using that existing pole sign in the spaces that are
advertised on it, but that is something a business owner should research prior to
entering into an interest in the property.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2000-279, City Clerk Clark administered an oath to
the following individual that she would provide true and honest testimony:
Cynthia Patience Summers, 868 E. Rialto Avenue, San Bernardino, CA, asked
why anyone would want to stand in the way of a business prospering in the City
of San Bernardino given the current economy. She urged the Council to allow
the applicant to erect a sign.
Council Member/Commissioner McCarnmack asked if there were covenants
related to reciprocal parking agreements on these parcels.
Ms. Rahhal stated that reciprocal parking and access were required at the time of
development of the project site and those were defmitely confirmed by staff in the
early 1980s. She stated that there was no requirement to have covenants on
signage and staff does not have anything in their files regarding the covenants on
II
12/011200S
the property. She stated that the reciprocal parking agreements may be recorded
as easements as separate instruments. Ms. Rahhal stated that they have not
reviewed the original covenants on the property in detail other than what was
required through the Planning process. She stated that they may exist, but she
didn't know.
City Attorney Penman stated that the issue before the Council today is a variance.
He stated that Mr. Navarro could file an appeal claiming that staff is incorrect in
their interpretation of documents and whether or not they are entitled to have a
sign, which is separate from the variance. What he is appealing is the denial of a
variance, and the Council, sitting in a quasi-judicial capacity, is limited to making
a determination whether or not a variance is permissible.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack asked why the applicant was
counseled by someone to even file for a variance.
Ms. Rahhal stated that this sign application and the appeal that followed and the
variance that was filed has taken many months, and she could recall being
involved in several e-mails going back and forth trying to explain the situation
and actually trying to dissuade the applicant from filing a variance application,
but ultimately saying that it was his right if he chose to do so.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Brinker, that the hearing be closed; and that the Mayor
and Common Council deny Appeal No. 08-03 and uphold the Planning
Commission's denial of Variance No. 08-01, based upon the Findings of Fact
contained in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 17, 2008. The
motion carried. Ayes: Estrada, Brinker, Johnson, McCammack. Nays:
Baxter, Kelley. Vacant: Fourth Ward.
21. Norton Space and Aeronautics Academy - Reimbursement Agreement for
waiver/reimbursement of fees (Continued from August 4, 2(08)
Council Member/Commissioner McCarnmack made a motion, seconded by
Council Member/Commissioner Baxter, that the Mayor and Common Council
continue consideration of a reimbursement agreement to the Council/Commission
meeting of March 16, 2009. The motion carried unanimously with the Fourth
Ward vacant.
12
12/01/2008
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Present: Mayor/Chairman Morris; Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Baxter,
Brinker, Kelley, Johnson, McCarnmack; City Attorney Penman, Economic
Development Agency Interim Executive Director Marzullo, City Clerk Clark.
Absent: None.
Vacant: Fourth Ward
R22. RES. CDC/2008-45 - Resolntion of the Community Development Commission
of the City of San Bernardino approving and authorizing the Interim
Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San
Bernardino ("Agency") to execute a Professional Services Agreement by and
between the Agency and MAPCO Corporation for professional consulting
and engineering services of the Agency owned properties in the North Arden
Guthrie Area (IVDA Redevelopment Project Area).
City Attorney Penman stated that his office had received an e-mail inquiry from a
member of the public asking whether or not there is a conflict because David
Mlynarski, one of the principal officers of MAPCO Corporation, is a member of
the Planning Commission.
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack stated that Mr. Mlynarski is on two
commissions-the Bureau of Franchises and the Board of Building
Commissioners.
Mr. Penman stated that neither commission was directly related to this matter,
therefore, he did not believe there was a conflict.
Council Member/Commissioner Baxter made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Estrada, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No.
CDC/2008-45 was adopted unanimously with the Fourth Ward vacant.
23. Public Comments
C. Patience Summers, 868 E. Rialto Avenue, San Bernardino, CA, stated that
Vice President Dick Cheney has been indicted on charges where he was invested
in a private prison and used his position to stop an investigation on it much the
same way as our CPS judges are invested in adoption agencies and are profiting
from it.
13
12/0 I/200S
David McCammack, 634 E. Parkdale Drive, San Bernardino, CA, stated that it
is getting tough to do business in San Bernardino. He stated that last weekend
when they were gone, they returned to find out that their $7,000 trailer had been
stolen. He stated that he has had glass broken out of cars, radios stolen out of
cars, air-conditioners stolen off buildings, murders across the street and up and
down Highland Avenue. He asked what the Mayor was going to do about it-that
we help everybody on welfare, but what was the Mayor going to do for the
business people.
24. Adjournment
At 5:14 p.m., the meeting adjourned. The next joint regular meeting of the
Mayor and Common Council/Community Development Commission is scheduled
for Monday, December 15,2008.
RACHEL G. CLARK
City Clerk
By~1~tJj
Linda Sutherland
Deputy City Clerk
14
12/0112008