HomeMy WebLinkAbout35-Development Services
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: James Funk, Director ..1'.":" ,', '.." ,.", Subject: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
W j I. 1.1... , , . /.L to establish a facility for Central City
Dept: Development Services . .. J' Lutheran Mission at the SWC Virginia and
"G" Streets.
Date: September 28,2001
MCC Date: October 1, 2001
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
September 4, and 17,2001. The Mayor and Common Council received input on the application
and continued to October 1,2001.
Recommended Motion:
That the Public Hearing be closed, the Negative Declaration be adopted, and Conditional Use
Permit No. 00-11 be approved, based on the Findings of Fact, subject to the Conditions of
Approval (Revised) and Standard Requirements.
Ylmiv C.RJ-u {..Hv vr:-
James Funk r
Contact person:
Valerie C. Ross
Phone:
384.5057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report
Ward:
2
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
Source: (Acc!. No.)
(Acc!. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No.
35
/0/ /0'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Mayor and Common Council meeting of September 17, 2001
CUP Applicant:
Pastor David Kalke
Central City Lutheran Mission
1354 N. "G" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92405
909.381.6921
BACKGROUND
At the September 4, 2001 Mayor and Common Council meeting, the Council considered Central
City Lutheran Mission's request to obtain a Conditional Use Permit to establish a social service
facility at the southwest corner of"G" Street and Virginia Street - an expansion of their existing
facility. Area residents raised concerns, and the public hearing was continued to September 17,
2001 to enable the Mission and the residents to discuss the concerns. At the September 17, 2001
Council meeting, the item was continued to October 1, 2001.
On September 8, 2001, Central City Lutheran Mission hosted a neighborhood meeting to explain
their proposal to area residents, and to address concerns from the residents. A subsequent
meeting was held on September 11, 2001. Councilwoman Susan Lien attended both meetings. At
the September 11 th meeting, Councilwoman Lien discussed additional conditions of approval
with representatives from the Mission and area residents. The revised conditions (Condition Nos.
7-15) are included as Exhibit 1.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None; the applicant paid all Conditional Use Permit application fees.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council close the public hearing, adopt the
Negative Declaration, and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11 based on the Findings of
Fact, subject to the Conditions of Approval (Revised) and Standard Requirements.
Exhibits:
I
Revised Conditions of Approval
EXHIBIT 1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-11
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - REVISED
1. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction shall have
occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after
commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the
permit/approval shall become null and void. Phasing of project
construction/development shall be as follows:
Expiration Date: Two years following the Mayor and Common Council Decision
2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration
date and for good cause, grant a one-time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review
authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code
proVtSlons.
3. In the event this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense of this
matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
City of San Bernardino (City), the Economic Development Agency of the City of San
Bernardino (EDA), any departments, agencies, divisions, boards or commission of either
the City or EDA as well as predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, elected
officials, officers, employees, representatives and attorneys of either the City or EDA
from any claim, action or proceeding against any of the foregoing persons or entities.
The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which
the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition.
The costs, salaries, and expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office shall
be considered as "attorneys fees'"for the purpose of this condition.
As part of the consideration for issuing this permit, this condition shall remain in effect if
this Conditional Use Permit is rescinded or revoked, whether or not at the request of
applicant.
4. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plants) approved by the
Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and
Common Council. Minor modification to the planes) shall be subject to approval by the
Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds
10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the
refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing
review authority if applicable:
Agenda Item No. 35
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: October 1, 2001
a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping;
b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures;
c. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of
finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme; and,
d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project.
5. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or
no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business
commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the
Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed
with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate, if necessary.
The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all
terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit.
6. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development
Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property
Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and
grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air
pollution; glare control; exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor control;
screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control.
Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are
complied with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or
meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending
with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground.
:. /..11 Hsas aftae faeility sliall13e GSFlaHetea. eSlHfJletely ~."itRiH an 0RGlesea stnl6hlfe, eUGeJ3t
fer taese aetiyities 8eH81:16tea ia tRe ~A.Jl=JJJkitReater. Tae aeti.:ities e8Bs.l::16tea in tae
AIHf)kitkeater sRall Be limited t8 tRe a8HFs ef8:QQ am t8 R:QQ fnR.
7. All uses shall be conducted within an enclosed structure, except for the
amphitheater.
a, Special events in the amphitheater shall require that notification be provided
one week in advance, to all properties within 100 feet.
b. All activities in the amphitheater shall be limited to the hours of 10:00 a,m. to
8:00 p,m,
8. Music related to ongoing, daily activities shall not be audible at the property line,
9. Music related to special events shall not exceed 65 decibels at the property line,
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: October 1,2001
10. The perimeter wall shall be increased to 8 feet along the back yards of the
residential lots that front on Virginia Street, "G" Street, and 13th Street, The entire
perimeter wall shall be installed with the first phase of development. A net shall be
placed on/along the fence in the vicinity of the basketball court to keep balls out of
adjacent properties,
11. Central City Lutheran Mission shall establish a "hot line" for use by area residents.
12. Central City Lutheran Mission shall hold/host two neighborhood meetings per year,
CCLM shall notify all properties within 100 feet, the City Council Office, and
Planuing Division, The purpose of the meetings is to exchange information and
ensure that Central City Lutheran Mission is a "good neighbor."
13. No activities may occur along or in the front yard areas along Virginia Street, "G"
Street, and "H" Street, Central.City Lutheran Mission is responsible for ensuring
that loitering and/or "hanging out" does not occur in these areas,
14, CCLM shall take photos of site graffiti, notify the Police Department, and remove
graffiti within 24 hours of any and all occurrences,
15. If public pay phones are installed, they shall be placed within a building and set-up
for outgoing calls only,
16. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the
following City Departments or Divisions:
a. Public Works Division
b. Plan Check Division
c. Fire Department
d. Public Services Department
e. Parks Recreation & Community Services Department
f. Municipal Water Department
g. Water Reclamation
7 - n 0 ~ il;) i
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
RAcHEL G. CLARK, CM.C. - CITY CLERK
3M
P.O. Box 1318. San Bernardino. CA 92402
300 North "D" Slreet. San Bernardino. CA 92418-0001
909.384.5002. Fax: 909.384.5158
Business Registration Division: 909.384.5302
Passport Acceptance Facility: 909.384.5128
www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us
September 19, 2001
Pastor David Kalke
Central City Lutheran Mission
1354 North "G" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92405
Dear Pastor Kalke:
At the meeting of the Mayor and Common Council held on September 17, 2001, the
following action was taken regarding the public hearing relative to Development Code
Amendment No. 00-01, to establish Social Service Uses/Centers as conditionally
permitted uses and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11, to establish a facility for Central
City Lutheran Mission at the southwest corner of Virginia and "G" Streets:
The public hearing for Development Code Amendment No. 00-01 was
closed; the Negative Declaration was adopted; the first reading of the
ordinance was waived and the ordinance was laid over for final
adoption; and the public hearing for Conditional use Permit No. 00-11
was continued to the Mayor and Council meeting of October 1, 2001.
If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
~~h~
Rachel G. Clark, CMC
City Clerk
RC:lh
cc: Development Services
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ADOPTED SHARED VALUES: Integrity. Accountability. Respect for Human Dignity. Honesty
0,... . ,". "/
./.,
ri.~ ~di. a, I...
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: James Funk, Director
Subject: Development Code Amendment
No. 00-01 - To establish Social Service
Uses/Centers as a conditionally permitted
uses and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
to establish a facility for Central City
-.. '''nn;nn ,t the SWC Virginia and
Dept: Development Services
Date: September 13, 2001
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
ll(
. 17, 2001
September 4, 2001. The Mayor and Common (_
continued to September 17, 200 I.
lpplications and
Recommended Motion:
That the Public Hearing be closed, the Negative Declaration be adopted, the first reading be
waived, and the ordinance be laid over for final adoption.
That the Public Hearing for Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11 be continued until October I,
2001.
~r;. ~ ~JF
James Funk
Contact person:
Valerie C. Ross
Phone:
384.5057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report
Ward:
2
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
Source: (Accl. No.)
(Accl. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
R'V.vlo.UQ~
9 /11/01, t-f d4
9N(al' -:f"J3
I
Agenda Item No.
;lJ3s
J()/Io;
I'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Development Code Amendment No. OO-Oland Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Mayor and Common Council meeting of September 17, 2001
DCA Applicant:
City of San Bernardino
CUP Applicant:
Pastor David Kalke
Central City Lutheran Mission
1354 N. "G" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92405
909.381.6921
BACKGROUND
At the September 4,2001 Mayor and Common Council meeting, the Council considered the
Development Code Amendment that would establish Social Service Uses/Centers as
conditionally permitted uses in the multi-family land use districts, and Central City Lutheran
Mission's request to obtain a Conditional Use Permit to establish a social service facility at the
southwest comer of"G" Street and Virginia Street - an expansion of their existing facility. Area
residents raised concerns, and the public hearing was continued to September 17,2001 to enable
the Mission and the residents to discuss the concerns.
On September 8, 2001, Central City Lutheran Mission hosted a neighborhood meeting to explain
their proposal to area residents, and to address concerns from the residents. A subsequent
meeting was held on September II, 200 I. However, not all of the issues have been addressed at
this time, and Councilwoman Susan Lien has requested that the Development Code Amendment
be considered for approval and the Conditional Use Permit be continued for two weeks.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None; the applicant paid all Conditional Use Permit application fees. The Development Code
Amendment is City-initiated.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council:
. Close the public hearing, adopt the Negative Declaration, and adopt the Ordinance
approving Development Code Amendment No. 00-01.
. Continue the public hearing for Conditional Use Permit No. OO-lluntil October I, 2001.
EXHIBIT 1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-11
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - REVISED
1. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction shall have
occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after
commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the
permit/approval shall become null and void. Phasing of project
construction/development shall be as follows:
Expiration Date: Two years following the Mayor and Common Council Decision
2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration
date and for good cause, grant a one-time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review
authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code
provISIons.
3. In the event this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense of this
matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnifY and hold harmless the
City of San Bernardino (City), the Economic Development Agency of the City of San
Bernardino (EDA), any departments, agencies, divisions, boards or commission of either
the City or EDA as well as predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, elected
officials, officers, employees, representatives and attorneys of either the City or EDA
from any claim, action or proceeding against any of the foregoing persons or entities.
The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which
the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition.
The costs, salaries, and expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office shall
be considered as "attorneys fees" for the purpose of this condition.
As part of the consideration for issuing this permit, this condition shall remain in effect if
this Conditional Use Permit is rescinded or revoked, whether or not at the request of
applicant.
4. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the planes) approved by the
Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and
Common Council. Minor modification to the planes) shall be subject to approval by the
Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds
10% of the following allowable measurable design/site consjderations shall require the
refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing
review authority if applicable:
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping;
b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures;
c. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of
finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme; and,
d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project.
5. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or
no change of use ofland or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business
commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the
Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed
with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate, if necessary.
The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all
terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit.
6. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development
Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property
Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and
grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air
pollution; glare control; exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor control;
screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control.
Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are
complied with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or
meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending
with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground.
'7. }Jll::lses sf t.He faBility SHall 98 e8BaHstea eSBlflletely .,,'itJtiR 8.fl 8aelesea stmetm:s, 81C6ept
fer taese aElti~/ities eSBeh:lsteEl iFl tRe ~A..lBJlRitlieater. THe aeti.:ities 8SR(:hlstea if! tae
~^..FBfJRitReat0r shall se liffiitea 18 t.fie Rears sf &:99 am t8 &:00 fUB.
7. All uses shall be conducted within an enclosed structure, except for the
amphitheater.
a. Special events in the amphitheater shall require that notification be provided
one week in advance, to all properties within 100 feet.
b. All activities in the amphitheater shall be limited to the hours of 10:00 a,m. to
8:00 p.m.
8. Music related to ongoing, daily activities shall not be audible at the property line,
9. Music related to special events shall not exceed 6S decibels at the property line.
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-/ /
Meeting Date: August 7, 200/
10. Tbe perimeter wall sball be increased to 8 feet along tbe back yards of tbe
residential lots tbat front on Virginia Street, "G" Street, and 13lh Street, Tbe entire
perimeter wall sball be installed witb the first phase of development. A net shall be
placed on/along the fence in the vicinity ofthe basketball court to keep balls out of
adjacent properties.
11. Central City Lutheran Mission shall establish a "hot line" for use by area residents.
12, Central City Lutheran Mission shall hold/host two neighborhood meetings per year,
CCLM shall notify all properties within 100 feet, the City Council Office, and
Planning Division. The purpose of the meetings is to exchange information and
ensure that Central City Lutheran Mission is a "good neighbor,"
13. No activities may occur along or in the front yard areas along Virginia Street, "G"
Street, and "H" Street. Central City Lutheran Mission is responsible for ensuring
that loitering and/or "banging out" does not occur in these areas.
14. CCLM shall take photos of site graffiti, notify the Police Department, and remove
graffiti witbin 24 hours of any and all occurrences.
15. If public pay phones are installed, they shall be placed within a building and set-up
for outgoing calls only,
16. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the
following City Departments or Divisions:
a. Public Works Division
b. Plan Check Division
c. Fire Department
d. Public Services Department
e. Parks Recreation & Community Services Department
f. Municipal Water Department
g. Water Reclamation
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: James Funk, Director
Subject: Development Code Amendment
No. 00-01 - To establish Social Service
Uses/Centers as a conditionally permitted
uses and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
to establish a facility for Central City
Lutheran Mission at the SWC Virginia and
"G" Streets.
Dept: Development Services
Date: August 13, 2001
MCC Date: September 4, 2001
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
None
Recommended Motion:
That the Public Hearing be closed, the Negative Declaration be adopted, the first reading be
waived, the ordinance be laid over for final adoption, and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11 be
approved, based on the Findings of Fact, subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard
Requirements.
k"~
Contact person:
Valerie C. Ross
Phone:
384.5057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Ordinance
Ward:
2
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No.
ff3S
/a /1 ) {jf
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Development Code Amendment No. 00-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Mayor and Common Council meeting of September 4, 2001
DCA Applicant:
City of San Bernardino
CUP Applicant:
Pastor David Kalke
Central City Lutheran Mission
1354 N. "G" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92405
909.381.6921
REQUEST
The Development Code Amendment will establish Social Service Uses/Centers as conditionally
permitted uses in the multi-family land use districts. It includes a definition of Social Service
Uses/Centers that may include a mix of community serving uses including food service,
childcare facilities, job training and after school programs, medical clinics, recovery facilities,
and related residential components, operated by nonprofit agencies.
The Conditional Use Permit is to allow the Central City Lutheran Mission to establish a social
service facility at the southwest comer of"G" Street and Virginia Street, in conjunction with
their existing facility. The new uses include a clinic, dormitory facility for interns, classrooms,
and a multi-purpose facility.
At their meeting of August 7, 2001, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Development Code Amendment and Conditional Use Permit. The vote was 6-0, with
Commissioners Coute, Derry, Durr, Enciso, Garcia, and Thrasher present.
Refer to the Planning Commission staff reports for additional information.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None; the applicant paid all Conditional Use Permit application fees. The Development Code
Amendment is City-initiated.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council close the public hearing, adopt the
Negative Declaration, adopt the Ordinance, and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11 based
on the Findings of Fact, subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements.
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: DCA 00-01 &
PLANNING DIVISION CUP 00-11
LOCATION MAP
LAND USE DISTRICTS HEARING DATE: 9/4/01
u
NORTH
~
"J"~ ?~I.' ,
'U:T ~ "''f' il ... .
I I ( "_tltl4tl= . _VJ I~-
... 'c: ,
.".... "i .
~ ~1~I.l
I. 'T.'~1 I~
~... I ~ l-.ifl
~ t:l t~,.t. ," I ~ ~ I I
\II~~ t- ~ :T,J~
\V';.. i ' ~
'$ ~,inia Ave ....JI. .. I 1 Lt f--~
;; in . I {2..\ - t. r', c;or
J: Qj ,13th streill ~.. ~ .
. '~l!! , i :l r '111 ~1rL'
rIll ~ 1lt.,HZ :11 I 4f z: I eft""
I II ~.I:;,.!I ~i=- I
.. -d]::=.;.:....:-t"'I 'l.r9l...st ....c
.J r. I cd r p. ~/---'~,
l . I -l--r.",. I-I _ ::;11 ~ 'I
I '"~~. ! ===d I ~;r.L.........I' i
J....'2Jc::;J ~ I::' ~II
. I!I l1': I'
~ i', II
. 6:J II' II c(m ~
i i~ ~~ -! v ILllJlj
~J- ~I' ." " 1l~~
LJII I I.Q iJ I
...]1 _ I~!-~
~
~ i~. z
UJ[]
I TllElfTONI ~ ~,,:l
_"' =:i
.
,
, ,
,
G:;J....... .., ur;::
IGJD~
I-.-..~ I
" ./:i ~ ~
. 1- ~
N ~~ -- ~~
~ I.... It)
! ~ r.:~...I;
"'~.
~
Iv
f'
'!i
&!!!
=
~
-
lL
~ll; ,-
.... Sf
-
-
!
i .. ~
;
..
T
={ . ~~ ,-
~ Ill.l, ~d I
~ tJ ..
t [[[]~, ~
rltu~~Finn, '.
r
'-
r
'-
c
EXHIBIT 2
SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION
CASE:
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01
AGENDA ITEM:
HEARING DATE:
WARD:
3
August 7, 2001
Citywide
APPLICANT:
City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
REQUEST/LOCATION: A request to amend the Development Code to establish Social
Service Uses/Centers as conditionally permitted uses in the multi-family land use districts.
CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS:
Ii!l None
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS:
o Not Applicable
o Exempt, Section
Ii!l No Significant Effects
o Potential Effects, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Ii!l Approval
o Conditions
o Denial
o Continuance to:
r
"-
r
'-
c
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 2 of6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01 is a City-initiated amendment to establish social
service uses/centers as conditionally permitted uses in the multi-family land use districts. The
proposed Development Code language is included in Attachment A.
BACKGROUND
The City has many organizations providing a wide range of social services dispersed throughout the
City in residential and commercial areas. Mary's Mercy Center, the Central City Lutheran Mission,
and the Salvation Army are three of the organizations providing services in the City.
Mary's Mercy Center is located between 6th and 7th Streets at Roberds Street and Victoria Avenue
in the former Guadalupe Church and School facilities. The uses are nonconforming in the RS,
Residential Suburban land use district. Mary's Mercy Center is comprised of Veronica's Home of
Mercy, a residential facility for women in the former convent and Mary's Table, which provides
meals for homeless persons in the former school. This building also has shower facilities for
homeless persons. Future uses include a new residential structure for battered women and a modular
unit to house a clinic, and to provide a mailing address and telephone message service for homeless
persons. None of the anticipated, future uses are pennitted.
The Central City Lutheran Mission occupies a former church at the southwest comer of"G" Street
and Virginia Avenue in the RU-I, Residential Urban and RM, Residential Medium land use
districts. After school programs are currently provided. Central City Lutheran Mission owns two
adjacent single family homes that operate as residential care facilities (6 or fewer). Proposed uses
include a dormitory facility for intems and a 4,000 square foot classroom facility in the RU land use
district, and a 3,200 square foot multi-purpose building and a 7,400 square foot clinic in the RM,
Residential Medium land use district. The residential and classroom facilities could be interpreted to
be permitted, subject to a Conditional Use Permit. However, the clinic and multi-purpose facilities
are not permitted.
The Salvation Army purchased an existing commercial/industrial structure located on Spruce Street
in the CR-2, Commercial Regional land use district and received Development Review Committee
approval to establish a residential/training facility (mixed use) for its Path to Prosperity Program.
Mixed uses are permitted subject to a Development Permit.
Development Code Permitted Uses
Commercial Districts
. Social Service Centers are permitted in the CO-I and 2, CG-l through 5, CR-2, and CR-3 land
use districts subject to a Development Pennit. (Social Service Centers are not defined.)
. Health Clinics/Outpatient Surgery Facilities are permitted in the COol and 2, CG-l through 5,
CR-2, and CR-3 land use districts subject to a DP.
. Emergency Shelters are permitted in the CR-2 land use district subject to a Conditional Use
Permit.
"-
r-
\.-
r
"-'
Development Code Amendment No. 00-0/
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 3 of6
. Outpatient Treatment Programs are pennitted in the CO-l and 2, CG-l, 2, and 5 land use
districts subject to a CUP.
. Mixed Uses (two or more land uses such as residential, office, manufacturing, retail, public, or
entertaimnent) are pennitted in the CR-21and use district subject to a Development Pennit.
Residential Districts
. Homeless Facilities are permitted in the RM and higher land use districts subject to a CUP.
. DormitorieslFratemity/Sorority Houses are permitted in the RM and higher land use districts
subject to a CUP.
. Churches and Private Schools are permitted in all residential land use districts subject to a
CUP.
. Community Care Facilities (state licensed facilities of six or fewer) are permitted in all
residential land use districts.
The City's Legislative Review Committee considered social service uses/centers and
recommended that the Mayor and Common Council initiate an amendment to the Development
Code. The Mayor an,d Common Council directed staff to prepare the amendment.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC REVIEW
An Initial Study was prepared to address potential impacts related to the proposed amendment.
The Initial Study concluded that there would be no negative impacts that could not be mitigated
through application of the development standards. (Attachment B.) A Negative Declaration is
proposed for the amendment.
The following public review opportunities were provided:
. June 7, 2001. The D/ERC recommended that a Negative Declaration be prepared.
. June 13,2001. Notice ofIntent published in The Sun and posted with the County Clerk.
. June 14 - July 4,2001. Public review period. No comments were received.
. July 5, 2001. D/ERC moved the amendment to Planning Commission and recommended that
the Negative Declaration be adopted.
ANALYSIS
Many organizations provide social services throughout the City in residential and commercial
areas. Staff has received several inquiries from social service providers regarding the provision
of services and establishment of related facilities in residential land use districts. Social service
providers locate where they are best able to serve their clients, and often select residential areas.
Most of the uses are not permitted in the residential land use districts. Staff believes that some
uses may be appropriate in certain neighborhoods, but not in others. Through a Conditional Use
Permit, the Planning Commission can evaluate social service uses/facilities requests at noticed
public hearings. The Planning Commission can approve requests, or deny if the use is not
appropriate at a given location. Through a Conditional Use Permit, conditions of approval can be
included, as necessary.
c- DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FINDINGS
1. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the City's General Plan?
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 4 0[6
General Plan Goal I G states:
"Achieve a pattern and distribution of land uses which
a. allow for the infill and recycling of areas at their prevailing scale and
character;
b. provide for the revitalization, adaptive reuse, and upgrade of deteriorated
neighborhoods and districts;
h. provide a diversity of areas characterized by differing functional activity
and scales and intensity of uses."
General Plan Objective 1.8 states:
r
\,..,
"Provide lands to accommodate housing units which meet the diverse economic and
social needs ofthe residents; locating development to
a. retain the scale and character of existing residential neighborhood;
b. facilitate the upgrade and intensification of declining and mixed-density
residential neighborhoods; and
c. allow expansion into vacant and low-intensity use lands within
infrastructure and environmental constraints."
Yes, the proposed amendment includes standards that require the developing social
service use/center be compatible with adjacent residential uses in terms of density and
intensity. The requirement for a conditional use permit gives the discretion to apply
appropriate standards to ensure compatibility or to not approve a social service use/center
ifit would impact adjacent uses.
2. Will the proposed amendment be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City?
No, As discussed previously, an Initial Study was prepared and no impacts were
identified that could not be mitigated to a less than significant level. A Negative
Declaration is proposed.
CONCLUSION
The requested amendment to establish social service uses/centers as conditionally permitted uses
in the multi-family land use districts is consistent with the General Plan and meets all necessary
Findings of Fact for approval.
r
'-
,--,
'-
/""'"'.
\.-
c
RECOMMENDATION
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 5 oJ6
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Common Council
adopt the Negative Declaration and approve Development Code Amendment No. 00-01.
Respectfully Submitted,
~r~
James Funk
Director of Development Services
VtlwiJ e,.:guy
Valerie Ross
City Planner
Attachments
A Social Service Uses/Centers - Proposed Language
B Initial Study
.---
f
'-
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 60f6
ATTACHMENT A
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO, 00-01
SOCIAL SERVICE USES/CENTERS
Social Service Uses/Centers. A building or buildings used for recreational, educational, cultural,
or religious activities operated by nonprofit groups or agencies that are open to the public.
Related uses may include food service, childcare facilities, job training programs, after school
programs, medical clinics, and other similar uses or activities. Residential facilities may be
established as part of the use. Drug and alcohol recovery facilities (outpatient or residential) may
be a component of the social service use. The following provisions are applicable to social
service uses/centers:
I.
2.
3.
C 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
14.
15.
The density of residential uses shall be consistent with the underlying land use designation.
The intensity of non-residential uses shall be compatible with the underlying land use
designation.
The underlying land use district standards are applicable (i.e. setbacks, building height, lot
coverage, design guidelines, etc.).
Parking shall be provided for each component, although shared parking is permitted.
Landscaping shall be provided consistent with the provisions in Chapter 19.28.
The hours of operation may be limited in order to ensure there are no adverse impacts with
adjacent uses.
The site shall have direct frontage along a major, secondary, or collector arterial.
Vehicular access shall be provided from a major, secondary, or collector arterial.
The minimum lot area in residential land use districts shall be one acre.
All on-site signage shall comply with the provisions of the underlying land use district.
A 6- foot high decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along all interior property lines.
All uses must occur within fully enclosed structures unless the review authority approves
exceptions.
The review authority may require management and security plans.
State licensing may be required.
Single Room Occupancy facilities, boarding houses, parolee facilities, and
detention/correctional facilities are not included in the definition of Social Service Use.
Social Service Uses/Centers may be established in multi-family land use districts, subject to a
Conditional Use Permit.
Social Service Uses/Centers may be established in cornrnercialland use districts, subject to a
Development Permit. Social Service Uses/Centers with a residential component located in
,I""'"'" cornrnercialland use districts shall require a Conditional Use Pennit.
\.-.
fM-
\.-
r'
\..-
c
ATTACHMENT "B"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
INITIAL STUDY FOR
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: Development Code Amendment No. OO-Olis a
request to establish Social Service Uses as conditionally permitted uses in the multi-family land
use districts.
DATE: June 7, 2001
PREPARED BY
City of San Bernardino
Development Service Department
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
(909) 384-5057
.........
c
r
'-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a
proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from
CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from
CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
must be prepared.
1. Project Title:
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01
2. Lead Agency Name:
Address:
City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
3. Contact Person:
Phone Number:
Valerie C, Ross
909.384.5057
4. Project Location (Address/Nearest cross-streets): N/A
5. Project Sponsor:
Address:
City of San Bernardino
300 N, "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92401
6, General Plan Designation: N/A
7. Description of Project: See attached.
8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Various ~rban development
9, Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, finance approval, or participation
agreement): N/A
IS 1
/"""
\.-
c
,,-..
"'-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
D Land Use and Planning
D Population and Housing
D Earth Resources
D Water
D Air Quality
DTransportation/Circulation
D Biological Resources
D Energy and Mineral Resources
D Hazards
D Noise
D Mandatory Findings of
Significance
D Public Services
D Utilities and Service Systems
D Aesthetics
D Cultural Resources
D Recreation
Determination.
On the basis of this Initial" Study, the City of San Bernardino, Environmental Review Committee finds:
That the proposed project COULD NOT have significant effect on the environment, [gJ
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
That although the proposed proj ect could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o
That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
That although the proposed proj ect could have a significant effect on the 0
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
(aJtW;(i,w
Ob/07/0 I
Date
Signature
VfJ(/)tf,J. ~ G. RosS
Printed Name
IS 2
\,....-
".-
L
r"
L
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Will the
proposal result in:
a) A conflict with the land use as 0 0 0 ~
designated based on the review of the
General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning
Districts Map?
b) Development within an Airport District 0 0 0 ~
as identified in the Air Installation
Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Report
and the Land Use Zoning District
Map?
c) Development within Foothill Fire 0 0 0 ~
Zones A & B, or C as identified on the
Land Use Districts Zoning Map?
d) Other? 0 0 0 0
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Will the
proposal:
a) Remove existing housing (including 0 0 0 ~
affordable housing) as verified by a
site survey/evaluation?
b) Create a significant demand for 0 0 0 ~
additional housing based on the
proposed use and evaluation of project
size?
c) Induce substantial growth in an area 0 0 0 ~
either directly or indirectly (e.g.,
through projects in an undeveloped
area or an extension of major
infrastructure)?
d) Other? 0 0 0 0
IS 3
'-
c
,-...
\.-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
III. EARTH RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a) Earth movement (cut and/or fill) on D D D ~
slopes of 15% or more based on
infonnation contained in the
Preliminary Project Description Form
No.D?
b) Development and/or grading on a slope D D D ~
greater than 15% natural grade based
on review of General Plan HMOD
map?
c) Erosion, dust or unstable soii D D D ~
conditions from excavation, grading or
fill?
d) Development within the Alquist-Priolo D D D ~
Special Studies Zone as defined in
Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic,
Figure 47, of the City's General Plan?
e) Modification of any unique geologic or D D D ~
physical feature based on field review?
f) Development within areas defined as D D ~ D
having high potential for water or wind
erosion as identified in Section 12.0,
Geologic & Seismic, Figure 53, of the
City's General Plan?
g) Modification of a channel, creek or D D D ~
river based on a field review or review
of USGS Topographic Map ?
h) Development within an area subject to D D ~ D
landslides, mudslides, subsidence or
other similar hazards as identified in
Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic,
Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the City's
General Plan?
IS 4
'-
,r
'--
,-
'-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
i) Development within an area subject to 0 0 [8J 0
liquefaction as shown in Section 12.0,
Geologic & Seismic, Figure 48, of the
City's General Plan?
j) Other? 0 0 0 0
IV. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage 0 0 0 [8J
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff due to impermeable
surfaces that cannot be mitigated by
Public Works Standard Requirements
to contain and convey runoff to
approved storm drain based on review
of the proposed site plan?
.
b) Significant alteration in the course or 0 0 0 [8J
flow of flood waters based on
consultation with Public Works staff?
c) Discharge into surface waters or any 0 0 0 [8J
alteration of surface water quality
based on requirements of Public Works
to have runoff directed to approved
storm drains?
d) Changes in the quantity or quality of 0 0 0 [8J
ground water?
e) Exposure of people or property to 0 0 0 [8J
flood hazards as identified in the
Federal Emergency Management
Agency's Flood insurance Rate Map,
Community Panel Number ,
and Section 16.0, Flooding, Figure 62,
of the City's General Plan? .
f) Other? 0 0 0 0
IS 5
'-
c
.-..
,
"-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
V. AIR QUALITY. Will the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or D D D ~
contribute to an existing or projected
air quality violation based on the
thresholds in the SCAQMD's "CEQA
Air Quality Handbook"?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to D D D ~
pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or D D D ~
temperature, or cause any change in
climate?
d) Create objectionable odors based on D D D ~
information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form?
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. D D D D
Could the proposal result in:
a) A significant increase in traffic D D D ~
volumes on the roadways or
intersections or an increase that is
significantly greater than the land use
designated on the General Plan?
b) Alteration of present patterns of D D D ~
circulation?
c) A disjointed pattern of roadway D D D ~
improvements?
d) Impact to rail or air traffic? D D D ~
e) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or D D D ~
off-site based on the requirements in
Chapter 19.24 of the Development
Code?
t) Increased safety hazards to vehicles, D D D ~
bicyclists or pedestrians?
IS 6
,~'^
\....-
c
r
\-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
0 0 0 [gJ .
g) Conflict with adopted policies
supporting alternative transportation?
h) Inadequate emergency access or access 0 0 0 [gJ
to nearby uses?
i) Other? 0 0 0 0
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Could the
proposal result in:
a) Development within the Biological 0 0 0 [gJ
Resources Management Overlay, as
identified in Section 10.0, Natural
Resources, Figure 41, of the City's
General Plan?
b) Impacts to endangered, threatened or 0 0 0 [gJ
rare species or their habitat (including,
but not limited to, plants, mammals,
fish, insects and birds)?
c) Impacts to the wildlife disbursal or 0 0 0 [gJ
migration corridors?
d) Impacts to wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, 0 0 0 [gJ
riparian and vernal pool)?
e) Removal of viable, mature trees based 0 0 [gJ 0
on information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form and verified by site
survey/evaluation (6" or greater trunk
diameter at 4' above the ground)?
t) Other? 0 0 0 0
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL
RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy 0 0 0 [gJ
conservation plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a 0 0 0 [gJ
wasteful and inefficient manner?
IS 7
'-
c
\.....-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
c) Result in the loss of availability of a 0 0 0 [8J
known mineral resource that would be
of future value to. the region and the
residents of the State?
IX. HAZARDS. Will the proposal:
a) Use, store, transport or dispose of 0 0 [8J 0
hazardous or toxic materials based on
information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form No. G(J) and G(2) (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b) Involve the release of hazardous 0 0 0 [8J
substances?
c) Expose people to the potential 0 0 0 [8J
health/safety hazards?
d) Other? 0 0 0 0
x. NOISE. Could the proposal result in:
a) Development of housing, health care 0 0 0 [8J
facilities, schools, libraries, religious
facilities or other noise sensitive uses
in areas where existing or future noise
levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A)
exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A)
interior as identified in Section 14.0,
Noise, Figures 57 and 58, ofthe City's
General Plan?
IS 8
"~...""",-
""-
r
\.......
r
\...,.,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
b) Development of new or expansion of 0 0 0 [8J
existing industrial, commercial or other
uses which generate noise levels above
an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn
of 45 dB(A) interior that may affect
areas containing housing, schools,
health care facilities or other sensitive
uses based on information in the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form No. G(l) and evaluation of
surrounding land uses No. C, and
verified by site survey/evaluation?
c) Other? 0 0 0 0
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal
have an effect upon, or result in a need for
new or altered government services in any
of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 0 [8J 0
b) Medical aid? 0 0 [8J 0
c) Police protection? 0 0 [8J 0
d) Schools? 0 0 0 [8J
e) Parks or other recreational facilities? 0 0 [8J 0
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 [8J
g) Maintenance of public facilities, 0 0 0 [8J
including roads?
h) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 [8J
XII. UTILITIES. Will the proposal, based on 0 0 0 0
the responses ofthe responsible Agencies,
Departments, or Utility Company, impact
the following beyond the capability to
provide adequate levels of service or
require the construction of new facilities?
a) Natural gas? 0 0 0 [8J
IS 9
'-
,,--
\.-
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
b) Electricity? 0 0 0 [8J
c) Communications systems? 0 0 0 [8J
d) Water distribution? 0 0 0 [8J
e) Water treatment or sewer? 0 0 0 [8J
f) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 [8J
g) Result in a disjointed pattern of utility 0 0 0 [8J
extensions based on review of existing
patterns and proposed extensions?
h) Other? 0 0 0 0
XIII. AESTHETICS.
a) Could the proposal result in the 0 0 0 [8J
obstruction of any significant or
important scenic view based on
evaluation of the view shed verified by
site survey/evaluation?
b) Will the visual impact of the project 0 0 0 [8J
create aesthetically offensive changes
in the existing visual setting based on a
site survey and evaluation of the
proposed elevations?
c) Create significant light or glare that 0 0 0 ~
could impact sensitive receptors?
d) Other? 0 0 0 0
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Could the
proposal result in:
a) Development in a sensitive 0 0 [8J 0
archaeological area as identified in
Section 3.0, Historical, Figure 8, of the
City's General Plan?
IS JO
'-
c
r-
'-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
b) The alteration or destruction of a 0 0 ~ 0
prehistoric or historic archaeological
site by development within an
archaeological sensitive area as
identified in Section 3.0, Historical,
Figure 8, of the City's General Plan?
c) Alteration or destruction of a historical 0 0 [8J 0
site, structure or object as listed in the
City's Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey?
d) Other? 0 0 0 0
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood 0 0 0 ~
or regional parks or other recreational
facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational 0 0 0 [8J
opportunities?
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 [8J
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 ~
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
of long-term, environmental goals?
IS 11
/......-
,
~.
r-
'-
-
I
\..,.,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 ~
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental 0 0 0 ~
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
IS 12
'-
c
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
REFERENCES. The following references cited in the Initial Study are on file in the Development
Services Department.
I. City of San Bernardino General Plan.
2. City of San Bernardino General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Districts Map.
3. City of San Bernardino Development Code (Title 19 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code).
4. City of San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey.
5. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones Map.
6. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
8. Public Works Standard Requirements~water.
9. Public Works Standard Requirements-grading.
DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIED CHECKLIST RESPONSES.
III. Earth Resources.
f, h, i. Proposed social service uses/centers will be evaluated on an individual basis and case-by-
case mitigation measures identified, if applicable, for development in areas with potential for
erosion, landslides, mudslides, subsidence, liquefaction, or similar hazards.
VII. Biological Resources.
e. Social service uses/centers may be proposed in areas with mature stands of trees. Prior to
removal of any trees, an arborist's report will be required to identify mitigation measures, if
applicable.
IX. Hazards.
a. Social service uses/centers with clinics will use, store, transport, and dispose of hazardous or
toxic materials. Each project will be evaluated "On an individual basis and mitigation measures
identified, as applicable.
IX. Public Services.
a, b, c, e, h. Social service uses/centers may result in the need for new or altered government
services. Each project will be evaluated on an individual basis and mitigation measures identified,
as applicable.
XIII. Aesthetics.
e. Social service uses/centers will result in the new sources oflight, based on the components of
the proposed use. Appropriate mitigation measures, as applicable, will ensure that light or glare
does not negatively impact adjacent uses.
XIV. Cultural Resources.
a, b, c. Social service uses/centers may be proposed in areas with potential historical,
archaeological, or cultural resources. Each project will be evaluated on an individual basis and
mitigation measures identified, as applicable.
IS 13
.F_O_"'"
""-
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 00-01
SOCIAL SERVICE USES/CENTERS
Social Service Uses/Centers. A building or buildings used for recreational, educational,
cultural, or religious activities operated by nonprofit groups or agencies that are open to
the public. Related uses may include food service, childcare facilities, job training
programs, after school programs, medical clinics, and other similar uses or activities.
Residential facilities may be establishe.d as part of the use. Drug and alcohol recovery
facilities (outpatient or residential) may be a component of the social service use. The
following provisions are applicable to social service uses/centers:
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
6.
C 7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
14.
15.
The density ofresidential uses shall be consistent with the underlying land use
designation.
The intensity of non-residential uses shall be compatible with the underlying land
use designation.
The underlying land use district standards are applicable (i.e. setbacks, building
height, lot coverage, design guidelines, etc.).
Parking shall be provided for each component, although shared parking is
permitted.
Landscaping shall be provided consistent with the provisions in Chapter 19.28.
The hours of operation may be limited in order to ensure there are no adverse
impacts with adjacent uses.
The site shall have direct frontage along a major, secondary, or collector arterial.
Vehicular access shall be provided from a major, secondary, or collector arterial.
The minimum lot area in residential land use districts shall be one acre.
All on-site signage shall comply with the provisions of the underlying land use
district.
A 6-foot high decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along all interior
property lines.
All uses must occur within fully enclosed structures unless the review authority
approves exceptions.
The review authority may require management and security plans.
State licensing may be required.
Single Room Occupancy facilities, boarding houses, parolee facilities, and
detention/correctional facilities are not included in the definition of Social Service
Use.
Social Service Uses/Centers may be established in multi-family land use districts, subject
to a Conditional Use Permit.
Social Service Uses/Centers may be established in commercial land use districts, subject
to a Development Permit. Social Service Uses/Centers with a residential component
located in commercial land use districts shall require a Conditional Use Permit.
c
~-
.
"-
c
EXHIBIT 3
SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION
CASE:
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
AGENDA ITEM:
HEARING DATE:
WARD:
4
August 7, 2001
2
OWNER:
Pastor David Kalke
Central City Lutheran Mission
1354 No. 'G' Street
San Bernardino CA 92405
(909) 381-6921
APPLICANT:
Doug Andresen
Andresen Architects
1771 S. Arrow Blvd.
Fontana CA 92335
(909) 355-6688
REQUEST/LOCATION:
A request to establish a social service center and to construct four new buildings totaling 16,305
square feet on the premises of the Central City Lutheran Mission. The proposed buildings will
include a Multi-Purpose Facility, Classrooms, residence/offices, a clinic and 102 off-street
shared parking spaces. The 2.8-acre site is located at 1354 N. 'G' Street in the RU-2, Residential
Urban and RM, Residential Medium land use districts.
CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS:
None
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS:
o Not Applicable
o Exempt
. No Significant Effects, Proposed Negative Declaration
o Potential Effects, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
. Approval
. Conditions
o Denial
r- 0 Continuance to:
\.....
,,#-
\-
c
c
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A request to establish a social service center and to construct four new buildings totaling 16,305
square feet on the premises of the Central City Lutheran Mission (CCLM). The proposed
buildings will include a Multi-Purpose Facility, Classrooms, residence/offices, a clinic and 102
off-street shared parking spaces (Attachment B). The proposed project is located in the RU-2,
Residential Urban and RM, Residential Medium land use districts (Attachment A).
SETTING/SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The site is flat and partially developed with the church and single family homes. The portion of
the site that is proposed for the new development is vacant. The surrounding land uses include to
the north and east, multi-family apartments in the RU-2, Residential Urban land use district, to
the south, single-family homes in the RU-2, Residential Urban land use district, to the west are
single-family homes in the IL, Industrial Light land use district on the west side of'H' Street.
EXPANDED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project has been designed to be a project in a cornmunity, for the community, with
the community. The majority of the participants in the CCLM programs are within walking
distance to the site. The following is a detailed description of the new facilities and proposed
uses:
Multi-Purpose Facility: A recreational and community center (3,240 square feet) will offer a
meeting room for up to 250 persons, indoor basketball and showering facilities for participants.
The facility will be open for neighborhood cultural events, dinners and activities. The center will
be open Monday - Friday from 3:00 pm to 9:00 pm, Saturdays from 10:00 am to 9:00 pm and
Sundays from 10:00 am - 9:00 pm, providing supervised recreational activities during non-
traditional hours for teens and pre-teens.
Communications Center (Classrooms): This educational unit (4,028 square feet) will serve
two functions. The first function will be the addition of four classrooms expanding the space
available for Central City Lutheran Mission's (CCLM) after school program. The second
function will be a state-of-the-art computer laboratory that will include an apprenticeship
program for older teens with training in desktop publishing, internet skills, computer hardware
and software and the use of a web press. The educational unit will be open Monday - Friday
8:30 am to 6:00 pm. The apprenticeship program will incorporate adolescents and young adults
in a supervised training program. The training program will involve six to ten students at a time,
operating until 5:30 pm. Additionally, the center will serve as a site for an after school program
serving neighborhood youth ages 5 - 12 from 3:30 pm to 6:00 pm. The estimated average
attendance is 50 children in the program.
Residence/Office for Interns: The residence facility (1,662 square feet) will house graduate
students and interns from schools of social work, public health and theology. Up to six students
will be housed for year-long internships while they work in the Mission's urban programs.
'-
r-
\-
{
"--
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 3
Facilities for shorter term clerical sabbaticals will also be available. Up to six adult graduate
students/interns will be housed for the CCLM's urban programs in this unit at a time. This area
will be their private residential facility while on staff with Central City Lutheran Mission. Each
staff person will be assigned a room, with kitchen, dining and living spaces being shared.
Medical Clinic: The Community Oriented Primary Care Facility (6,384 square feet) is designed
to serve the uninsured and the underinsured in the immediate neighborhood. Owned by CCLM,
the clinic will be operated by a professional health care facility which will partner its efforts to
provide health care and health education. The services will be provide by trained professionals
and will be open Monday - Friday, 8:30 am to 6:00 pm. This primary care facility will not
house an internal pharmacy; however, vaccines and medications used by the primary care
physicians in their day to day treatment of the community will be safely secured in the facility)
and will not be used for the dispensation of medications.
Amphitheater: The proposed project also includes an amphitheater and courtyard for outdoor
activities. Some of the activities that may occur in the amphitheater include weddings, plays,
classes and barbecues. Condition of Approval No.7 has been added to limit the outdoor
activities from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm so as to not disturb the residential uses surrounding the site.
The Development Cod~ does not allow all of the proposed uses in residential land use
districts. A Development Code Amendment is proposed concurrently by the City (DCA-
00-01) to change the Development Code to establish social service users/centers with
approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, although all of the proposed functions
of the social service center do not currently conform to the definitions and standards
included in the Development Code, the proposed DCA will provide the standards that the
proposed project will meet.
BACKGROUND
The Development/Environmental Review Committee (D/ERe) conducted a preliminary review
of the project on June 8, 2000. The D/ERC recommended revisions to the project and the
preparation of an Initial Study. The D/ERC reviewed the revisions to the project and the Initial
Study on June 7,2001. The Initial Study for a proposed Negative Declaration was circulated for
a 20-day public review period, beginning on June 14,2001 and ending on July 3,2001
(Attachment F). No comments were received during the review period and on July 5, 2001 the
D/ERC moved the project to the Planning Commission.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1.
Is the proposed use conditionally permitted within, and would not impair the integrity
and character of the subject land use district, and does it comply with all of the
applicable provisions of this Development Code?
'-
c
I"'"'
I
"-
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 4
Yes, the proposed project complies with all of the development standards proposed in
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01 for Social Service Uses/Centers. If the
Conditional Use Permit is approved the proposed uses will comply with all applicable
provisions. of the Development Code and General Plan as shown in Table A below,
except for the parking requirements:
TABLE A - Development Code/General Plan Conformance
CATEGORY PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN
CODE
Permitted Use Social Services Center Permitted subj ect to N/A
approval of DCA 00-01
Height 26 foot maximum height 2.5 story 2.5-story
35-feet 35-feet
Setbacks
- Front 26 feet 25 feet N/A
- Rear 20.75 feet 10 feet N/A
Landscaping 42.5%--39,386 square feet 15% of the surface parking N/A
area
Lot Coverage 23.7% 40% N/A
Parking
- Standard 96 spaces* 186 spaces N/A
- Handicap 6 spaces 6 spaces
*
The applicant has submitted a parking analysis of similar projects to justify the reduced parking
requirement. See discussion under Finding No: 5 and Attachment E.
2.
Is the proposed use consistent with the General Plan?
Yes, General Plan Goal lA states, that it is the goal of the City of San Bernardino to:
"Provide for the continuation and development of sufficient land use to serve the
housing, commercial, educational, cultural, recreational, and social needs of
existing residents and population growth" .
The proposed project will provide social, educational, medical, and religious services that
are not currently available to the residents in that area. It will also provide a focal point
for the community.
"'-
"".-
\-.-
./"""-
'--
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 5
3. Is the approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use in
compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code?
Yes, an Initial Study was prepared, as was described in the background of the report. No
public comments were received and a Negative Declaration is proposed for this project.
4. Are there potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality
and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored?
No, all impacts were review through the Initial Study and none were identified as having
the potential for negative impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is
proposed for this project (Attachment F).
5.
Are the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use
compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in
which the proposed use is to be located and will it create significant noise,
traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental
to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience, or welfare of the City?
Yes, the applicant proposes to establish a social service center and to construct four new
buildings, totaling 16,305 square feet on the premises of the Central City Lutheran
Mission, which is on 2.8 acres. The buildings include a Multi-Purpose Facility,
Classrooms, residence, a clinic and I02 off-street shared parking spaces.
The proposed project complies with the development standards proposed for social
Service Uses/Centers and the Development Code/General Plan Conformance Standards
as defined in Table A except for the number of parking spaces required.
The proposed project includes a total of8 buildings. The existing 4 building and the
proposed 4 new buildings. The buildings and parking requirements are:
Church Sanctuary
Multi-Purpose Center
Classrooms/Comm Ctr
Clinic
Residence/office
Homeless shelter
Aids shelter
House
1,890 square feet
2,326 square feet
six classrooms
6,384 square feet
6 rooms
1,831 square feet
903 square feet
54 parking spaces
67 parking spaces
12 parking spaces
45 parking spaces
6 parking spaces
o parking spaces
o parking spaces
2 parking spaces
Total parking required
Total parking proposed
I 86 parking spaces
102 parking spaces
,,--.
\..,.,
c
c
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 6
The applicant has submitted a parking analysis including two similar projects to justify
the reduced parking requirement (Attachment E). In each case there were vacant parking
spaces. This project is providing 51 % of the required parking. The 51% is more than is
provided at other similar projects, and all ofthe projects have unused parking spaces.
The adjustment is based on the fact that the majority of the people that utilize this facility
don't have cars and live in the neighborhood and can easily walk to the site.
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01 provision No.4 allows for shared parking. It
is assumed that not all of the uses on the site would be going on at the same time and that
parking can be shared depending on the event-taking place at the time.
The project will not create significant noise, traffic, or other conditions or situations
that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or
adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The
project will result in less residential density, exceeds the landscaping requirements and
will have a solid six foot fence around the portions of the property that abut residential
uses.
6.
Is the subject site physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use
being proposed?
Yes, the site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being
proposed as evidenced by project compliance with all applicable Development Code
Standards as noted above in Table A except for the parking. Development Code S
19.24.030 (6) allows for use not specifically listed to be determined by the Director based
on the requirements for comparable uses and the particular characteristics of the use. The
amount of parking proposed exceeds the requirements of similar uses.
7.
Are there adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public
utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to
public health and safety?
Yes, all agencies responsible for reviewing access, and providing water, sanitation and
other public services have all had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none have
indicated an inability to serve the project. The proposal will not be detrimental to the
public health and safety in that all applicable Codes will apply to the construction of this
project.
r
~
c
c
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 7
CONCLUSION
The proposal meets all necessary Findings of Fact for approval of Conditional Use Permit No.
00-11.
RECOMMENDA TION
Staffrecommends the Planning Commission recornmend that the Mayor and Common Council;
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration and;
2. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11, based upon the Findings of Fact contained in
this Staff RepOrl and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard
Requirements (Attachment D).
Respectfully Submitted,
J~(;'~r;;r
Director of Development Services
A. /3~#r~'.
~andi
Senior Planner
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Attachment D
Attachment E
Attachment F
Location Map
Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plans
Conditions of Approval
Standard Requirements
Applicants parking analysis
Initial Study
ATTACHMENT A
~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: CUP 00-11
PLANNING DIVISION
LOCATION MAP
LAND USE DISTRICTS HEARING DATE: 8/7/01
u
NORTH
..
~ U r\T ~ -- IL ~.~ 1~~
Iv - I ~ i~ . I
f'
UJ[J , ..S!. "Tj' ~'f '": !" I .
~ I ~l "....~ ;';: ... 'Ig
I I. ",.;
~rq~- !~
_'~ . = :i ,u i~I". ~ I I
. , ,-~ 'I~JU
. ~ I IT. .
I"~ ' .
, G;]~ ""ur:~. ~ I 11/P'
I.hlll(~' l~lI
:: ICJ~l..J r:2'./P' .
~ Ir.--~~ I ,'1' ';'t}- I r- ! ~'I II
W '. ~ ,I ,;!r.:r...
~~ H ro ~~ V""'.A~ r{. -" l f' ~"I
' ,- ~ ~~ ~-I ~ , r', ~()C~
N =: - ~l!!
.. u.. .....:I: Gi ,13th Street 1- ~ IOf A r- .
i ~ ~ ~ ie ~u I n 4,~i!' ,",~d
! ~ '~
51 ..
~. r ~ rl (!)~. I :\! ;'. il
l~iH~ ,,' -l~- .. .d]:=J' , , -L.J I
.....- ..... UII ~
I r-:,f 11 I "'! '~
IL. ..I!. ""..... ... i' -J~". If ";:;1 ~ II
-, ~II~ , ~ ---' ::: ~i ...i ~ i
ii.. '
. ~ 01.'\/1: r ,_ ~=I ~~ .
, .c _ i
~,M. ,.; :.;! "
~ =~ . 01 ll'",
i~J:j- 1I1v~rn0
f ~I ~8~ I
~JtI~ 'It.e 1]Q
D~D
= I ·
t ~ ___ II-~ ~
l~J nnrJn . . I - : ,~!il" -- ~
: ..J
.....
.id '!
'5 !. I!
oS !J'Jfl
~ ~. -I
,ls 1~5h
~ )UH
"-l
:e .d~1
.... 1m
o~
~ I ~
~~ ~:?
_ I ~'N
~ I Q:;~
o:;:::a 1:-
~ l~ ~ -
'0 q :~
Il ! ::;
I
'i
i
__...._...___.._.._-_................._.__._..._.--~..._---_......__......-------___(3'
11
--
.11>-.'- -.- r'
l e
i i
~1 l
I
C.
,
,.
t
t
c
e
1
Vi 0 C'f:)
. . ~ I
.. !. 1~ ~
li
- elli!1 t
~ " :1 \0 Ebo
... IJ~b "*' :l;
.~ ~ J Q;::
mu Q'~
\, .!1 ~ ...'1:1
.l:l . w):';:
:s l~ "'-
] .d!J ... 10 I tl~
fl' li -lXl
u
I'- lUJ .s ~
---.------..-...---
'~G
....:2: :
:::: -:T:~
........,..... ~:=.
.tt~ 1
-I=-{
.. :: ~
..... ..J =-
~
,
o
i
t ce ce
i ;1
i t f .; ;~
~
(, l
,...-
'-
~ 0 ~ I',
0; . . ~ I !
ti g. h ~
.1:
. Jl ~h~' I
t ~ ~
"- md ~ ."'~
C> roo !
li mu 1:..
"- - :s "",
.. t~ "-
l<l .; .....
tllll I:Q
. ] l:Q 10 n ....:x:
fl' t ·
I- dUo 5 .
--.....-----..-....---...-.........--.-,..-......-..------.-------.-----..-....-"" !
(3
I
c (3
..
~
.. ILl
,
I
~
r
;j
;j
i
I
,j
'1
I
I
l
'...
r
\.. s.- .
...? .
........ "::':1:-:::
....(' z'
~~ ~~I)~l
~~~
"'-.: ~o
.., -:;
.... ..I ;-
/ <
Jj 0 In f
. . ~ I
'" ;. h ~
'E I
- ~J' 11 I
~ 00
uhl . I
.. f:<' I
<> J ...
"ti )UU '- 'N 1
- :!:! ;::
... '- . 'N
lI.l :s l'"' -
d CQ i!> U
- 10 II
.~ {1 ~
F-< tud .5 .
----...-------...---...-...---"----...----...--- -_._--------------~
I J ~ ~;
.
,
4; ~
c
e
e ~ i
I i
r- c
\... I
,. ~; 4; ~
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 10
""'-'"
ATTACHMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
for
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
I. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction shall have
occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after
commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the
permit/approval shall become null and void. Phasing of project
construction/development shall be as follows:
Expiration Date: August 7, 2003
2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration
date and for good cause, grant a one-time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review
authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code
provIsIOns.
3.
In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notifY the
applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter.
Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnifY, and hold harmless the City, the
Economic Development Agency, their affiliates officers, agents and employees from any
claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further
agrees to reimburse the City and the Economic Development Agency of any costs and
attorneys' fees which the City or the Economic Development Agency may be required by
a court to pay as a result of such action, but sl!ch participation shall not relieve applicant
of his or her obligation under this condition.
c
4. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan(s) approved by the
Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and
Common Council. Minor modification to the planes) shall be subject to approval by the
Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds
10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the
refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing
review authority if applicable:
a.
b.
c.
/~'
'- d.
On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping;
Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures;
Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of
finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme; and,
A reduction in density or intensity of a development project.
-",--
\.-
c
c
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 11
S. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or
no change of use ofland or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business
commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the
Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed
with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate, if necessary.
The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all
terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit.
6.
This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development
Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property
Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and
grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air
pollution; glare control; exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor control;
screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control.
Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are
complied with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or
meter cabinets &hall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending
with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground.
7.
All uses of the facility shall be conducted completely within an enclosed structure, except
for those activities conducted in the Amphitheater. The activities conducted in the
Amphitheater shall be limited to the hours of8:00 am to 8:00 pm.
8. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the
following City Departments or Divisions:
a. Public Works Division
b. Plan Check Division
c. Fire Department
d. Public Services Department
e. Parks Recreation & Community Services Department
f. Municipal Water Department
g. Water Reclamation
--
\.-.-
c
,"'""
\.-
ATIACIlMENT "D"
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
. NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the applicant is
responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They
may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans.
1. Drainaae and Flood Control
a) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public
drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
b)
If site drainage is to be outletted into the public street, the drainage shall
be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with
City Standard No. 400. Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway
approaches will not be permitted.
c)
Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to
maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge
Permit Requirements. A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the
State Water Quality Control Board for construction disturbing 5 acres of
more ofland.
d)
The City Engineer, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an
Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due
to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of
construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be
immediately built upon.
Page 1 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
-
l..
c
c
ST ANDARD REQUI~EMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U,P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
2. Gradina and LandscaDina
a) If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and
drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a
grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in
strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and
the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
b)
If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit
conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the Development
Code shall be obtained from the Department of Development Services-
Planning Division prior to issuance of any grading or site development
permits.
c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond
will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with
Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code.
d) If more than 1,000 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets
then a special hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer.
Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls,
bonding, covering of loads, street cleaning, etc. may be required by the
City Engineer.
e) A liquefaction evaluation is required for the site. This evaluation must be
submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any
grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction
evaluation shall be incorpor~ted .in the grading plan.
Page 2 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
\.......
r-
\.-
r'
\......
ST AtiDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P, NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
f) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible,
this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to
all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See
"Grading Policies and Procedures").
g) A refuse enclosure constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing
No. 508. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15
feet, unless the Public Services Department, Refuse Division, approves a
smaller size, in writing.
h)
Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and
detailed on the On-site Improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the
On-site Improvement permit issued by the City Engineer.
i) The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting,
including light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design,
conduit location and size, and the number and size of conductors.
Photometry calculations shall be provided which show that the proposed
on-site lighting design will provide 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly
distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation
and 0.25 foot-candles security lighting during all other hours.
j) The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all
requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to
handicap parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing'
building access points for handicap accessibility, if applicable.
k) A handicap accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way
to the building entrance. All pathways shall be concrete paved and shall
provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the
pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6 feet.
Page 3 of 9 Pages
7/912001
'-
c
~.
'-
S,TANPARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
I) Where the handicap accessible path of travel crosses drive aisles, it shall
be delineated by striping or textured/colored concrete pavement.
m) A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if
reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is proposed to cross
lot lines, or a lot merger shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines.
n) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the
Engineering Division for Checking.
0)
The public right-of-way, between the property line and top of curb (also
known as .parkway") along adjoining streets shall be landscaped by the
developer and maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. Details of
the parkway landscaping shall be included in the project's on-site
landscape plan.
p) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to
allow the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of
owner neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property
owner and shall ensure that, if the property owner or subsequent owner(s)
fail to properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file
appropriate liens against the property in order to accomplish the required
landscape maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of
$200.00 shall be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing
costs. The property owner, prior to plan approval, shall execute this
easement and covenant unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer.
Page 4 of 9 Pages
7/912001
,..,,.........
"-
c
(
'-
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICESIPUBLlC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
3. Utilities
a) Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with
City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility,
including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV
optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses).
b) Backflow preventers shall be installed for any building with the finished
floor elevation below the rim elevation of the nearest upstream manhole.
c)
This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of
San Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and
Procedures" and City Standard Drawings.
d) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as
required.
e) A street cut permit, from the City Engineer, will be required for utility cuts
into existing streets where the street is not being repaved as part of the
required improvements. .
f) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either
side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Section
19.20.030 (non-subdivisions of the Development Code.
g)
Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at
the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except
overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be
undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030 (non-
subdivisions).
Page 5 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
I~
l..
r
'-'
,..--"
!
'-'
5T ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C,U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
h) As an alternative to undergrounding required by Section 19.20.030 (non-
subdivision) of the Development Code, the developer will provide a letter
of agreement for participation in an assessment district, if one is formed,
to fulfill the requirement for undergrounding utilities. Prior to recordation
of a map or issuance of building permit subdivider/developer shall have
the letter of agreement recorded with the deed.
i)
Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained
by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and
inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan
designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer
will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where
practical.
4. Street Imorovement and Dedications
a) All public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be
improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps,
street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to
traffic signals, traffic signal modifications, relocation of public or private
facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, shall be
accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street
Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting
Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street
improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
Page 6 of 9 Pages
71912001
.,""""'....
,
\.....-
c
c
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
b) . For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of way
(R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and
placement of the curb line(C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be
as follows:
Street Name Right of Way(ft.) Curb Line(ft)
"G" STREET 41.25' (EXISTING) 25.75' (EXISTING)
"H" STREET 30' (EXISTING) 20' (EXISTING)
VIRGINIA AVENUE 30.0' (EXISTING) 20' (EXISTING)
c) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
No. 202, Case "AU (6' wide adjacent to curb).
d) Construct Handicap Ramps in accordance with City Standard No. 205 at
all curb returns within and adjacent to the project site. Dedicate sufficient
right-of-way at the corner to accommodate the ramp.
e) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type II,
including Handicap by-pass. Remove existing driveway approaches that
are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter
and sidewalk. .
f) Install Street Lights adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
Nos. SL-1 and SL-2.
Page 7 of 9 Pages
71912001
--.....
"-'
C'
.........
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICESIPUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
5. Reauired Engineerina Permits
a) Grading permit (If applicable.).
b) On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see
Development Services-Building Division), including landscaping.
c) Off-site improvements construction permit.
6.
ADDlicable Enaineerina Fees!
a) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 4% and 4%,
respectively, of the estimated construction cosf of the off-site
improvements.
b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings
- See Development Services-Building Division) - 2% and 3%, respectively,
of the estimated construction cost' of the on-site improvements, including
landscaping.
c) Plan check and inspection fees for grading (If permit required) - Fee
Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter.
I All Fees are subject to change without notice.
'Estimated Construction Cost for Off-Site Improvements Is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with
the Public Works Division.
3 Estimated Construction Cost for On-Site Improvements Is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with
the Public Works Division.
Page 8 of 9 Pages
71912001
"'~..."..
.,-
r-
'-
,.,....-
/
'-
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount as follows based on $0.429 per
square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area (estimated
as 85% of the net lot area), then $0.147 per square foot of remaining
impervious lot area or fraction thereof: $10,614.30
e) Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of J5.285.75 . Based on
309 trips per day @ $17.106 per new trip generated by the project. The
City Traffic Engineer shall determine exact amount at time of application
for Building Permit.
f)
Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount as follows based on
$242.91 per 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof: $1,457.46
g) Sewer inspection fee in the estimated amount as follows based on $20.48
per connection: $20.48
Page 9 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
/
__ City of San Bernardino
'-' STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Development Services/Plan Check Division
Date:I-10-0 I
Property address 13 t? 4- t'.J ~ ~ zr
1. Submit 4 sets of plans, minimum size 18" x 24", drawn to scale. If plan check is for
expeditious review, submit 5 sets. The plans shall include (if applicable):
a, site plan (include address & assessors parcel number)
b. foundation plan
c. floor plan (label use of all areas)
d. elevations
e. electrical, mechanical, & plumbing plans
f. detail sheets (structural)
g. cross section details
h. show compliance with Title 24/Accessibility (disabled access)
i. a plan check deposit fee will be required npon submittal of plans.
Call Development Services (plan check) 909-384-5071 for amount.
2.
The title sheet of the plans must specify the occupancy classification, type of construction, if
the building has sprinklers, & the current applicable codes.
c
3.
The person who prepares them must sign the plans. Also, provide the address & phone
number of that person. Some types of occupancies require that the plans are prepared,
stamped, and signed by an architect, engineer, or other person licensed by the State of
California.
4. For structures that must include an engineers design, provide 2 sets of stamped/wet signed
calculations prepared by a licensed architect/engineer.
5. Provide 2 sets of Title 24/Energy compliance forms and calculations. Some compliance
forms are required to be printed on the plans.
6. Submit grading, site, and/or landscape plans to Public Works/Engineering for plan check
approval and permits. For more information, phone 909-384-5111.
7. Fire sprinkler plans, fires suppression system plans, etc., shall be submitted to the Fire
Department for plan check approval and permits. For information, phone 909-384-5388.
8. Signs require a separate submittal to the Planning Division for plan check approval and
permits. For information, phone 909-384-5057.
c
9.
Restaurants, food preparation facilities, and some health related occupancies will reqnire
clearances and approved plans from San Bernardino County Health Department. For
information, phone 909-387-3043.
10. Occupancies that include restaurants, car washes, automotive repair/auto body, dentist
offices, food preparation facilities or processing plants, etc. may require approvals and
"""-" permits from San Bernardino Water Reclamation. For information, phone 909-384-5141.
11, An air quality permit may be required. Contact South Coast Air Quality Management
Division for information, phone 909-396-2000.
12. State of California Business & Professions Code/Contractors License Law requires that
permits can be issued to licensed contractors or owner-builders (that are doing the work).
Contractors must provide their State license number, a city business registration, and
workers compensation policy carrier & policy number. Owner-builders must provide
proof of ownership.
NOTE: PLAN CHECK TIME ON THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS IS APPROXIMATELY 3-4
WEEKS FOR 1ST CORRECTIONS. EXPEDITIOUS REVIEW IS APPROXIMATELY 10
WORKING DAYS. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS IS NOT THE BUILDING
PLAN CHECK AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE DESIGN AS SUBMITTED WILL BE
APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
c
c
~
-"'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: cVI"- O()-/j'
(! U" /, ,~v-<- J. Data: 0 - 1 v" /
. / 3 5 Y ;J . '(:; /, Reviewed By: c3.:J
GEllERAL REQUIREMENTS: , '.
~ Plovlde one oddltlonalllOt of constructlon ,...,. to Building end Sefoty for Fire Deportment uoo et time of p1en chock.
o Contect tho CIty of Sen Bornorellno Fire Deportment et 19091 394-6388 for epoclflc detailed requiremento.
o The dovolopw _ provide for odoquoto fire flow el ""'!'PIlted 'rt tho Fire Prevention Bureeu. Minimum fire !'Ow requlreme~ _be_d
on oquere ~, conotruction footurel, end exposure ,nformetiOn supplied by tho developet endllllll be Ivlileble IIIIlK to piecing _otible
materials on site.
,>J.'-
WATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION:
o The fire protection Wltor """,Ice for the eree of this project II provided by:
o Sen Bemerdino Municipel Weter Depertment - Engineering 19091 384-5391
DEist VIIIIY Weter District. Engineering 19091 888-8986
o Other Wster PIIrveyor:
Phone:
'f-
PUBLIC FIRE PROTEcnON FACILITIES:
~ Public fA hydr.u .... required Ilong streets at Imervals not to exceed 300 feM for commercial and multi-residential ar... and at intwv'" not
A exceed 500 feet for residential areaa.
[]"""" Fire hydrant minimum flow rat.. of 1 ,600 gpm at 8 20 psi minimum residual pr...ure ar. required for commercial and mutti-re.identlal ....
Minimum fh hydrant flow rat.. of 1,000 gpm at a 20 psi minimum re8idual preuur. are required for reaidentilll .r....
o Rre flow requiremente mey be met Irom the combinod flow of two edjecent fire hydrentl. Rre flow requlrementl mey be edjusted, es deemed
/opproprlete by tho Fire Depertment, besed on Indlvlduellite spoclflc conditions end IVeileble mitlgetlons.
[!I" Rre hydrent typo oncI specific Iacetion shell be jointly determined by the City of Sen Bemerellno Fire Deportment in conjunction with tho weter
. .JI"'Purveyor. Fire hydrant materials and installation shall conform to the standards and specifications of the water purveyor.
[]""'"" Public fir. hydrant., fir. lervices. and public water facilities nece...ry to meet Fire Department requirement. are the developer'. financial
responaibiUty and shaH be instlllled by the water purveyor or by the developer It the water purveyor's discretion. Contact the water purveyor
indicated above for additional information.
ACCESS:
ct: Provide two separate, dedicated routes of ingress/egre.. to the property entrance. The rout.. shall be paved, all weather.
~ Provide an acceu road to Mdt building for fire apparatus. Acces. roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of OPt less than 20 f..t
of unobstructed width. .
Extend roedWlY to within 150 feet of sll portions of the exterior well of ell single story buildings.
. Extend roodwey to within 50 feet of the extorior well of ell multiple-story buildings.
Provide -NO PARKING- IignI whenever parking of vehicle. would poSSibly reduce the cl..rance of acc'ss roadways to Ie.. than the required
, width. SIgns ore to reed "fiRE LANE . NO PARKING . M.C. See 16.1'.. .
o Dead1nd Itreetl ahall not exceed 600 f..t in length and shall have II minimum :40 foot radius turnaround.
o The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval.
Sm:: ' .
~ All acce.. rolds end street. .re to be constructed and u8.ble prior to combustible construction.
I!r ~ hydrente ohell be Instellod to protect eech building loceted more thon 150 foot from tho CUlb line. No fire hydrento should be within
~f eny exterior we.. The hydrento shell be Wet _ typo, with one 2'I,lnch end 4 Inch outlet. end epprovod by tho Fire Department.
Are hydrents sh.1I be designeted .s e "NO PARKING. zone by peintlng en 8 In!ll> Wid!" rod stripe for 15 feltl in lech di~lon in Iront of the
hydrant in such. m8nner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicle.. - C u'" .fit. '-- ,j ;-, ,~_.!.J-;-."7 fr' / /.. (...4 ~
BUILDINGS:
[j'" Adcb8a 1'lUmW'. ahall be.installed on the building at the front or other approved location in such. manner .. to be visible from the fronblge
street. Commercial and multi family addr... numerals .hall be 6 Inche. tall. single family address numerals shall be 4 inches yO. The color
../ of the numorels shsll contrest with tho color of the beckground.
rJ!./ klantify NCh V" end electric meter with the number of the unit it aery...
I!"'" Fire ExtinguiItWra must be Installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fir. extinguilher is 2A 108JC. Minimum
distribution of fire extinguilhera mud be such that no interior part of the building i. over 76 f..t trlvel dlmnce from I fire extinguisher.
o Apertmont __ with 18 or mare units, hotels lmotels) with 20 or mare units, or eportmonts or hotels lmotele) tt.-ee stories or more In hoIght
shell be equipped with automatic fir. sprinkler. aligned to NFPA lI'landard.. '
o All buildinge. other thsn reoldentiel. over 5.000 squer. '~~II "" equipped with en sutometlc fir. sprinkler system designed to NFPA
........stonclsrds. This Includes existing building. vecent over'36S days.
!f Submit plane for the fir. protection _ystem to the Fire Oepann;ent prior to beginning construction of the system.
1;1 ~ Tenent Improvemento In elllprlnklored buildings ere to be epproved by the Fire Depertment prior to stert of construction.
r Provide fwe alarm (required ttv'oughout). Plan must be approved by the Fir. Department prior to Itan of installation.
o Fir. Department connection to Isprlnkler system/standpipe system) shan be required at Fir. Department Ipproved location.
Note: The applicant must request. In writina, any changes to Fir. Department requirements. j'! Jf-
c-T /1. . ,-" 7 d.u. /
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: > ;;,.. ,,.. /LL-'- J . p:: l.o . ~ J ~". ~~..-t..c L,e - ~/"'7 - ..J r -- f1."
I) _jr,,,ec. / '"'~(' JJ I- ild/J 6 <s- t,- z./ t..v "-"-'
,;l) jJu..", h' (.i_ '. /-,__1_-:"(:,.,. ,I.~ ?..~ _< '"
LV<
/I)
~)
C)
U~.I-
Jy-
. .v
/-:r-"-
--<.. i- ,cly,. If
.......
,,-'-'--'-- L..fL'#
,
_::!}
...A-./ (AA. """
,
;.o1..~J-
,
/,'.. .
tC:~1
),~f.J
-../
/'" . '- ")
Jv.:.:,U--.~ ("v.j:....-M ,~(
"
.
,
I..-.~., ~
J,,"'-
l..(
-/
-I.
FP8170 (11-141
vi
~xf r
r:' --,-
, :~cI
-;
J.
/"'(..(011-1
.r /.~
""''-
r'
(
L-"'--t.L-
J., J' ~ '"1.
(I' , . ..... . "" , _
.11/,'
,.J ,'..
....., "..,-
{
y
_I ._.
-1,. JC.I
I'"
..\J._:::::J-:..'f.
i~""'~~~-
._.~",,---Z,,/...
~r-'_,~,~'1I~ ...-;
:,~.- ".."1'-"
.' 'c'~'"
~. .~_" 0.'
-./' - --,
,.:Y.~j" ,....-~. 19
1~''l::--~''''"'''' ;.:V..
v)~ -.r..'--
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PUBUC SERVICES DEPARTMENT - REFUSE & RECYCUNG DMSlON
STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
300 North D Street - 4th Floor CA 92418-0001
909-384-5335
---
Project Number C. L \. \' C ('- 'i \
Project DescripllonlBusiness Name
Project Location/Address \ '7,,;-
Reviewed By )'. , . -7" .L
[Office Use Only: City Service Application No.
COMMERCIAL
1. Establi8h 4? commercial refuse enclosure{s) according to CIty Pubic Works Standard 508 wilh a width of
._ and a length of -. LocatIon and orlo".1iuil of encIosure{s), gates, and compactor unli(s) shaI
be shown on Site Plans, labeled wilh clmenslons and spedIIcalIoIl8 to meet PubIc Works StIIndard 508, g& \:7t',~.
..IJ)i:::: 2. Locate refuse encIosure(s) and compactor unil(s) to be safely acceelible for selVice vehicles and without
obstruction to drive aisles, driveways, Ioacing ZOMS, parking, or handicap access. EncIosII"e must be at Ieaat 5'
from combustible wals, eave Ines, or openk1gs [98 CA F.-e Code 1103.2.2]. Minimum radii of 40' for aI drive turns
along 1he main ingress to and egress from enclosures and compactor pads.
3. Instal _ compactor unil(s) wilh a minimum capacity of _ cubic yards for each lII1il Roll-off box W1il(s)
ahal meet Pubic Works Standard 510.
4. Refuse and recycling selVice to litis location shal be provided by 1he City of San Bernarcino unless otherwise
noted. New ac:counts require a completed Service Application wilh a fuI deposit returned tt the CIty of San
Bernardino Refuse & Recyclng Division prior to issuance of1he final Certificate of Occupancy. ft~~ ~40A-
5. City front-load collection services shaD be established at 1he foIowing minimum levels:
REF\JSE SERVICE
BIN DAYS/WEEK
1-2CY
3CY
4CY
BCY
6, Sealed compactor unil(s) shaI be instaled wilh a recommended minimum 30 cubic yard rol-off box:
unil(s) for refuse, unil(s) for commingled dly recydables, and unil(s) for organics.
7. AppIcant shal submit a completed Integrated Waste Management Survey to 1he Pubic SeNices Department
Refuse and Recycling Division a minimum of 5 CIty work days for approval prior to issuance of any City permlls.
Contact 909-384-5549.. phone or 909-384-5190 fax.
...NA:-
-Y.-
C-x
~
.~
Project Planner --=- ----,::- . -\" \ \ I
. -), _ '( . (k/\.~,',
'O'_--"L:/ -...
J
/
(-
-\ ,:"',.,<.-:r-
Review Date " I I 00
Date Completed Application Returned _~--1
RECYCLING SERVICE
QTY BIN DAYS/WEEK
'7_ 1-2CY I
I 3CY "/
4CY
BCY
ORGAMCS SERVICE
QTY BIN DAYS/WEEK
1-2CY
3CY
4CY
BCY
RESIDENTIAL
1, Residenlial refuse and recycling services are to be provided by 1he City of San Bernardino Refuse & Recycling
Division. The City shaI provide one set of a blue, green, and black 96 or 64-ga1on automated selVice carts to each l\ \
single family unit OR one set to every two-unit multiple family dweIing up to six unils. ,.. ~ ~W\iWU4
2. Residential unils shal have a minimum 3 feet by 9 feet concrete pad located out of view of pubic right-of-way .
for storage of each set of three automated carts. Minimum gate openings ahal be 3 feet, and the path of 1ravel
from 1he storage pad to curb shal be continuously paved.
3. A minimum 12-foot space along 1he curb on the street must be dear for residential automated service carts,
Including a minimum 2-foot setback of al structures, fences, and raised landscaping.
4. Day of automated cart service ahan be: M @ W Th
X-
L
~
C ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OR NOTES
I. C!-\:V\tt.; e.<'\,l~......4 ~'"{ ~~ Ii, MIoI. \-\0-: f'AAI"f('!- t!AA("1~ _ <1,1){ '1, 1'1, /. I
~~~-"~,;:. ~;:'~t. p~6.." . -J..'~
1WhJ#a.4.......wt' rv_nnlnnllPfnk_RoIIIse & RfJCllcImJ /CSRsJJ /G~RC FIe] Re_ 3.8.2000
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PARKS, RECRIA'l'ION & COMMUNJ:TY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
.''''"'''''"'-
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
"-"
I '3:,:0-f
N
G-
5;:-'
case~C<....I' 00-//
Date: /- ~ -0 I
Reviewed By: :sr~ r:?v-vflb~
GBHBRAL RBQUJ:RBIIBNTS:
I ~mmercial Industrial' and Hulti-Unit
I ] Assessmant District
I ] Residential
I ]~rpose, Guidelines and submittal procedure
1-1r Irrigation and Landscaping Plans.
I ] Contact the City of San Bernardino Parks,Recreation and COJIIIIlI1I1ity Services
Department at (909) 384-5217 or 384-5314 for specific detailed
requirements.
SPBCIFIC
RBQUJ:RBIIBNTS:
I ~nte~ance of landscape areas
I ~Planter Areas
I I ~terior Planter Areas
I~ Irrigation Systams
I ] Setback Areas
I ] Slope Areas
I ] Ground Cover and Bedding Haterial
I ] Brosion Control
I ] Weed Control
C'
PLUIT MATERIALS
I / ~ list and climatic conditions
I ~treet Trees
I~ Plant Material Size Requirements and Ratios
INSPECTION AND OTHER RBQtJIRBIIBNTS
I ~igation System
I~Landscaping
I ]~ardscape Items
I -1r Street tree Specification.
I I Arborist Report
I I Removal or destruction of tree.
I ] Screening Requirement (City. Dev.Code)
Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to the Parks, Recreation and
Community Services requiramants, Additional information
A-(U( ~ A.AY
(/IV-~,,..'I',4..
/3~r
'9- /.,..-v'/
/
5/.2.<"
IV! /<;;.<:;/_ y c::::.rr.J'..,....
/ ..., , /'-"
...a.. UP t.../ / "rl--, "'" z..
//.-, ~ c::....
i3.v
.
.4Z/<P"7
<;; ,,:z. .p
r- r I/A "<..
\"""-r;. L-
L/<./~
- ^"! I/""r/~ 7'-<- ,- ..,f-..
/
(/\.111 I J~'" r:)."'/4f~/I
rD-j- 4:: fY/A-fJ{
A ;t/j/ h'1r~<;r--....7'.
t.A../ / r~, ::1 4 //
r-r""~ c;:
HS:jj
t:=:.'y?,-s"?-(-v 1
A;/
/ ry-, f~r{' ~
,<.r/,...,..",c._j'
Sysrt'M--"? "
,--; /A/~.s.
,
7- rJ
APN I4-S-I'l3~C>I) Dg) 10) 2.2-
erN 1-(X)O- 03;l...
SAN BERNARDINO MUNlCb>AL WATER DEPARTMENT
.......,,,-
(
!
"-JII'"
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Review of Plans: (' .t:JNOI-rIONAL I J"E: PEe..mIT Nil M-II Date Compiled:
~A/'IORESEI-J
OwnerlDeveloper: UNTk'fl. fl:J~u.rntER"N N11:5S({JlJ. AfJf..H/7JD:::TW.~ompiled By:
c.6NSr. Ot:" . TarM.lN& II.. 3C5 . 6Ill A. .
Type of Project: ::I. I? ACRE. SITE. f'LA5S1lOlJNl.S.I.fl!Js/N', .. "6"rwtT~ Number of Uruts:
, , <</'" ' , t: /i'L.
Location: /3~'f litJNTH "A /' :; ,IfFF-T. 6F CI'J1i'1eR . .
WATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING: F "b" VI-f'IHIA
Contact: BILL &~M:'" Phone: 3<6l{-5/07 Fax: .3K/f -SS32
Note: All Water Services are Subject to the Rules & Regulations of tho Water Depertment.
)( 1/1 r \I', "~,L 8' . . 'I ~ I 'I U M II ."....
Size of Main Adjacent the Project: I~ Lw VOl G 5f. I/. MT'N l:sm. CJIlotlIIll H. , n 1'6 T II( yIR<;,I""'T
I '
'i Approximate Water Pressure: -SD -1..r:!:(I Elevation of Water Storage: / G;l '1'1' Hydrant Flow@ 20 psi:
XType, SIze, Location, and Distance to earest Fire Hydrant: lOA, H s:"f1?E.€"T "AO-r7Y [H: II Jl!6/A/1I+-
5/% n /YIe.~
o Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter.
o Off.sile Water Facilities Required.
o Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department.
W'
-
" Conunents:
C~.;:.- ~.. "tt' ..
. . ATE; OU~LITY~ONTR;:
Contact: ('.tJlJ ~~IE.rrA Phone: 18i1- 5/39
! R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. C".. \'1\::;(""' \\::. ~~\C C<:., ")
'It Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service connection'~-\.~4""'c' 0 ~~: ~ ')
o Backtlow Device to be Inspected Before Water Service can be Activated. ... \
Fax: ~~4 -5532.
o No Backtlow Device Required at This Time.
ENVIRONMENT AL CONTROLIINDUSTRIAL WASTE:
Contact: DI6N C.ASTRO
Phone: ::3& If - 53 g.3
Fax: 38q-~25g
Note: No Brine Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed, Unless Holding and Hauling is Provided for the Brine. Allloterceplors
will be a 1200 Gallon Capacity with a Sample Box Included.
o Industrial Waste Pennit Required.
o Grease Interceptor Required.
o Pre-treRtment Required.
o Sand/Oil Interceptor Required.
o No Issues at tlus Time.
SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION:
Contact: _N lEt- "'nltJMS~N
Phone: 3~4-5oq3 Fax: 3<6/f-12//
Note: Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building & Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit.
o No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. 1-0 ~ dc,~~\"..l
r . (Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the Water Department for + Gallons Per Day, Equivalent Dwelling Units:
"-?(subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Pennit.
Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day:
<nT\1tl'nrl1t"DU,"'IO"l,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
300 NORTH "D" STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418 . (909) 384-5057
.:.
.:.
.:.
PROJECT REVIEW ROUTING
PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Revised Initial Study
TO: Valerie C. Ross - ERCIDRC Chair Jim Geodos . Parks & Recreation
Joe Lease - Plan Check Wes Farmer - Police Department
Geri Franske - Fire Department Michelle Dyck- Turner - Public Services Department
Youn Kim - Public Works Division Sue Morales - Economic Development Agency
Anwar Wagdy - Traffic Division Councilperson Lien - City Council Ward 2
James Dye - Water Department J:m. u:..t..vd - Water Reclamation Plant
ylrf-tl ~-r~~
FROM: Joe Bellandi, Senior Planner
DATE: June 18, 2001
E/DRC MEETING DATE: July 5, 2001
~
DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A request to establish a social service center at 1354 North "G" Street.
.- OWNER/APPLICANT: Central City Lutheran Mission
GEN. PLAN/ZONING: RU-2, Residential Urban
APN: Various
CEQA STATUS: Subject to CEQA
COMMENTS: (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY)
I
SURVEYIPERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED ~
SANDIOIL INTERCEPTOR REQUIRED 1200 GAL 0
GREASE INTERCEPTOR REQUIRED 1200 GAL 0
NO REQUIREMENTS 0
COMMENTS~~~ ~tPlI\5Si:'
M~ ~ R6 - /~ &..r~ Afp.
a... ,KO ,
APPROVED 0 D:tt~D
DATE Co - 2-D - ()l
SAN BERNARDINO WATER DEPT - ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
r-
,
CENTl.IL
CITY
).UTIEl.IN
,-JllION
W LS \!:? I.:l U \J L.:::II0
I ..8 1 6 2001
r.x I'
ATfACHMENT "E"
CITY OF SAN BERNAROINO
OEVELOPMENT SERVtCES
A Nefgh'bolnood Development ProjectEmpowerhg People
l354 North G SI1Ht San 8emaniIo, CA 93f05 PfIone: 909-11l1-6!I2l fill: 909-884 5IU e-mU: ccft.....~
'B' , The Word
~Creatbl Of
Commtrity.
r-
'-
c
-
Parking Spaces for the Proposed
Central City Lutheran Mission
Conditional Use Permit
1. There are special circumstances applicable to the property because oflocation and
surroundings that would advocate for a variance for the number of required parking
spaces from the strict application of this Development Code related to number of
parking spaces:
a. The location of the proposed building site - which is designed to be a
neighborhood service center operating at various times of the day - is in an area
of the City where only 35% to 40"/0 of the residents possess cars.
b. The experience of our location in offering programs is that the majority of persons
seeking services walk to our site for services. On Friday and Saturday evenings,
for example, we have a Narcotics Anonymous meeting that regularly enjoys the
participation of 100 to 125 persons. Yet on a given night, there are probably no
more than IS to 20 cars present. The majority of the persons walk.
c. On Sunday morning, there are probably 5 to 7 cars present during moming
worship hours, with attendance between 25-35. The majority of the persons walk.
d. On Tuesday morning, when we serve food to 48 local households, there are
probably no more than 10 to 15 vehicles present. The majority of the persons
walk.
e. On Christmas 'Eve, when we had 175 persons for worship, there were less than
20 cars in our parking lot. The majority of the persons walk.
2. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces is in keeping with the practice and
experience of similar service sites in our area.
a. Mary's Table, located on 641 Roberds Avenue in our neighborhood, serves 7,000
hot lunches between II :30 AM and 1 :30 PM, Monday through Friday, every
month. Their on-site parking spaces number less than 25. Once again, the
participants in the program are poor persons with no automobiles and walk for
services.
b. The Christian Center, located on uG" and 16th Street, also in our neighborhood, as
an After School Program and Teen Program that serves approximately the same
number of youth that we serve, about 80 per month. They have less than 10 on-
site parking spaces. Once again, given the age of the participants, all walk to the
site and parking is not a problem.
"- 3. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces will not be materially detrimental to
the public health, safety or welcome in our neighborhood. Rather, the granting of this
variance enabling the speedy processing ofa conditional use permit will improve our
neighborhood residents' access to recreational facilities, educational facilities and
health care facilities. Parking as required for use of these facilities is more than
adequate with our existing parking lot and the proposed addition of 92 spaces,
meaning that cars will be parked on site and street side parking will not be required
during any program time.
4. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces does not constitute a special
privilege inconsistent with the practices and procedures of similar non-profit
organizations providing services in this neighborhood. As mentioned above, non-
profit religious organizations operating in our area have fewer parking spaces than
what we are proposing in our building plans, and in some cases, are serving more
persons that we are projecting to serve given the planned usage of our building
complex. Hence, the granting of this variance does not constitute any special
privilege but is cognizant of present neighborhood practices and needs.
c
S. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces does not allow unauthorized
activities from taking place at our site, which is seen as a site for the promotion of
education, health and safety in our neighborhood. The granting of the variance for
parking spaces is a part ofa package Conditional Use Permit application which would
permit the functions on the property for which persons would be coming to the
facilities and therefore parking their cars. The educational building, health care
facility, recreational center and intern residency are being permitted through the
Conditional Use Permit, thereby assuring that parking by recipients of these services
are using the parking spaces for authorized purposes.
6. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces is not inconsistent with the General
Plan as outlined in our Conditional Use Permit application.
02113/01
,..........
"-
/""'-
~
c
c
ATfACIIMENf "F" .
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
INITIAL STUDY FOR
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A request to construct four new buildings,
totaling 16,305 square feet on the premises of the Central City Lutheran Mission, which
is on 2.8 acres. Buildings will include a Multi-Purpose Facility, Classrooms, residences,
a clinic and 102 off-street shared parking spaces. The facilities and proposed uses are a
Multi-Purpose Facility for a recreation and community center (3,240 square feet) will
offer a meeting room for up to 250 persons, recreational activities during non-traditional
hours. A Communications Center with classrooms. An educational unit (4,028 square
feet) for the addition of four classrooms. A Residence/Office for Interns. The residence
facility (1,662 square feet) will house graduate students and interns. A Medical Clinic.
A Community Oriented Primary Care Facility (6,384 square feet) is designed to serve the
uninsured and the underinsured.
DATE: June 7, 2001
PREPARED FOR
Central City Lutheran Mission
1354 N. 'G' Street
San Bernardino CA 92405
PREPARED BY
AEI-CASC Companies
937 South Via Lata, Suite 500
Colton CA 92507
REVIEWED BY
Environmental/Development Review
Committee on June 7,2001, pursuant to Section 21082
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
City of San Bernardino
Development Service Department
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
(909) 384-5057
,.......-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
"'-"
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a
proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from
CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from
CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
must be prepared.
1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 00-11, Central City Lutheran Mission
2. Lead Agency Name: City of San Bernardino
Address: 300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
3. Contact Person: Joe Bellandi
Phone Number: (909) 384-5057
4. Project Location (Address/Nearest cross-streets):
Southwest Comer ofG Street and Virginia Avenue (1354 North G Street)
c
5, Project Sponsor: Pastor David Kalke
Address: 1354 North G Street
San Bernardino, CA 92405
6. General Plan Designation: RM - Residential Medium & RU-2 - Residential Urban
7. Description of Project (Describe the whole action involved, including, but not limited to, later
phases of the project and any secondary, support, or off-site feature necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary):
A request to construct four new buildings, totaling 16,305 square feet on the premises of the
Central City Lutheran Mission, which is on 2.8 acres. Buildings will include a Multi-Purpose
Facility, Classrooms, residences, a clinic and 102 off-street shared parking spaces. The following
is a detailed description of the facilities (new buildings) proposed uses:
Multi-Purpose Facility: A recreational and community center (3,240 square feet) will offer a
meeting room for up to 250 persons, indoor basketball and showering facilities for participants.
The facility will be open for neighborhood cultural events, dinners and activities. The center will
be open Monday - Friday from 3:00 pm to 9:00 pm, Saturdays from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm and
Sundays from 2:00 pm - 6:00 pm, providing supervised recreational activities during non-
traditional hours for teens and pre-teens.
Commnnications Center (Classrooms): This educational unit (4,028 square feet) will serve two
I""""' functions. The first function will be the addition of four classrooms expanding the space available
'- for Central City Lutheran Mission's (CCLM) after school program. The second function will be a
state-of-the-art computer laboratory which will include an apprenticeship program for older teens
training them in desktop publishing, internet skills, computer hardware and software and the use of
IS 1
,....-
l
\.....-
c
/,-.
\-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
a web press. The educational unit will be open Monday - Friday 8:30 am to 6:00 pm. The
apprenticeship program will incorporate adolescents and young adults in a supervised training
program. The training program will involve six to ten students at a time, operating until 5:30 pm.
Additionally, the center will serve as a site for an after school program serving neighborhood youth
ages 5 - 12 from 3:30 pm to 6:00 pm. The estimated average attendance is 50 children in the
program.
Residence/Office for Interns: The residence facility (1,662 square feet) will house graduate
students and interns from schools of social work, public health and theology. Up to six students
will be housed for year-long internships while they work in the Mission's urban programs.
Facilities for shorter term clerical sabbaticals will also be available. Up to six adult graduate
students/interns will be housed for the CCLM's urban programs in this unit at a time. This area
will be their private residential facility while on staff with Central City Lutheran Mission. Each
staff person will be assigned a room, with kitchen, dining and living spaces being shared.
Medical Clinic: The Community Oriented Primary Care Facility (6,384 square feet) is designed to
serve the uninsured and the underinsured in the community (around CCLM). Owned by CCLM,
the clinic will be operated by a professional health care facility which will partner its efforts to
provide health care and health education.. The facility will provide quality health care by trained
professionals and will be open Monday - Friday, 8:30 am to 6:00 pm. This primary care facility
will not house an internal pharmacy (prescriptions will not be filled for the public; no narcotics nor
prescription-only medications will be housed on site; however, vaccines and medications used by
the primary care physicians in their day to day treatment of the community will be safely secured
in the facility) and will not be used for the dispensation of medications.
The proposed project has been designed to be a project in a community, for the community, with
the community. The majority of the participants in the CCLM programs are within walking
distance to the site.
8, Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
North: RU-2/Multi - Family Residential (apartments)
South: RU-2/Single Family Residential
East: RM/MuIti - Family Residential (apartments)
West: RU-2 & IL/Single Family Residential & Light Industrial (West side of"H" street)
9. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, finance approval, or participation
agreement):
IS 2
r
'-'
c
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL F ACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
o Land Use and Planning
o Population and Housing
o Earth Resources
o Water
o Air Quality
DTransportation/Circulation
o Biological Resources
o Energy and Mineral Resources
o Hazards
o Noise
o Mandatory Findings of
Significance
o Public Services
o Utilities and Service Systems
D Aesthetics
D Cultural Resources
o Recreation
Determination.
On the basis of this Initial Study, the City of San Bernardino, Environmental Review Committee finds:
That the proposed project COULD NOT have significant effect on the environment, [8J
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o
That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier ErR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
e &a- tIJ.:,
Ignatu
_'/?/Ol
Date ' {
Joe Bellandi
Printed Name
IS 3
-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
...........
c
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imoact Incorporated Imoact No Imoact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Will the
orooosal result in:
a) A conflict with the land use as 0 0 [8J 0
designated based on the review of the
General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning
Districts Map?
b) Development within an Airport District 0 0 0 [8J
as identified in the Air Installation
Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Report
and the Land Use Zoning District
Map?
c) Development within Foothill Fire 0 0 0 [8J
Zones A & B, or C as identified on the
Land Use Districts Zoning Map?
.
d) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Will the
proposal:
a) Remove eXlstmg housing (including 0 0 0 [8J
affordable housing) as verified by a
site survey/evaluation?
b) Create a significant demand for 0 0 0 [8J
additional housing based on the
proposed use and evaluation of project
size?
c) Induce substantial growth in an area 0 0 0 ~
either directly or indirectly (e.g.,
through projects in an undeveloped
area or an extension of major
infrastructure)?
d) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
r-
L
IS 4
"''''h
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
I"
\..-
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imoact Incomorated Imoact No Imoact
III. EARTH RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a) Earth movement (cut and/or fill) on 0 0 0 [8J
slopes of 15% or more based on
information contained In the
Preliminary Project Description Form
No.D?
b) Development and/or grading on a slope 0 0 0 [8J
greater than 15% natural grade based
on review of General Plan HMOD
map?
c) Erosion, dust or unstable soil 0 0 0 [8J
conditions from excavation, grading or
fill?
d) Development within the Alquist-Priolo 0 0 0 [8J
Special Studies Zone as defined in
Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic,
Figure 47, of the City's General Plan?
e) Modification of any unique geologic or 0 0 0 [8J
physical feature based on field review?
f) Development within areas defined as 0 0 0 [8J
having high potential for water or wind
erosion as identified in Section 12.0,
Geologic & Seismic, Figure 53, of the
City's General Plan?
g) Modification of a channel, creek or 0 0 0 ~
river based on a field review or review
of USGS Topographic Map ?
h) Development within an area subject to 0 0 [8J 0
landslides, mudslides, subsidence or
other similar hazards as identified in
Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic,
Figures 48,51,52 and 53 of the City's
General Plan?
c
r
'-
IS 5
(-'
\..,....
c
i
\",...-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imoact Incorcorated Im"act No Imnact
i) Development within an area subject to 0 0 [8J 0
liquefaction as shown in Section 12.0,
Geologic & Seismic, Figure 48, of the
City's General Plan?
j) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
IV. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage 0 0 [8J 0
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff due to impermeable
surfaces that cannot be mitigated by
Public Works Standard Requirements
to contain and convey runoff to
approved storm drain based on review
of the proposed site plan?
b) Significant alteration in the course or 0 0 0 [8J
flow of flood waters based on
consultation with Public Works staff?
c) Discharge into surface waters or any 0 0 0 [8J
alteration of surface water quality
based on requirements of Public Works
to have runoff directed to approved
storm drains?
d) Changes in the quantity or quality of 0 0 0 [8J
ground water?
e) Exposure of people or property to 0 0 0 ~
flood hazards as identified in the
Federal Emergency Management
Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map,
Community Panel Number ,
and Section 16.0, Flooding, Figure 62,
of the City's General Plan?
f) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
--
IS 6
i~"'-"
,
"-
c
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Sigrtificant
Imoact Incornorated Im"act No Imoact
V. AIR QUALITY. Will the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or 0 0 [8J 0
contribute to an existing or projected
air quality violation based on the
thresholds in the SCAQMD's "CEQA
Air Quality Handbook"?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to 0 0 [8J 0
pollutants?
c) Alter au movement, moisture, or 0 0 0 [8J
temperature, or cause any change in
climate?
d) Create objectionable odors based on 0 0 0 [8J
information contained m the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form?
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. 0 0 0 [8J
Could the proposal result in:
a) A significant mcrease in traffic 0 0 [8J 0
volumes on the roadways or
intersections . or an increase that is
significantly greater than the land use
designated on the General Plan?
b) Alteration of present patterns of 0 0 0 [8J
circulation?
c) A disjointed pattern of roadway 0 0 0 [8J
improvements?
d) Impact to rail or air traffic? 0 0 0 ~
e) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or 0 0 0 [8J
off-site based on the requirements in
Chapter 19.24 of the Development
Code?
f) Increased safety hazards to vehicles, 0 0 0 [8J
bicyclists or pedestrians?
IS 7
.r-
\-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
c
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Irnoact Incoroorated Imoact No Imoact
g) Conflict with adopted policies 0 0 0 (gI
supporting alternative transportation?
h) Inadequate emergency access or access 0 0 0 [8J
to nearby uses?
i) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Could the
proposal result in:
a) Development within the Biological 0 0 0 [8J
Resources Management Overlay, as
identified in Section 10.0, Natural
Resources, Figure 41, of the City's
General Plan?
b) Impacts to endangered, threatened or 0 0 0 [8J
rare species or their habitat (including,
but not limited to, plants, mammals,
fish, insects and birds)?
c) Impacts to the wildlife dispersal or 0 0 0 [8J
migration corridors?
d) Impacts to wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, 0 0 0 [8J
riparian and vernal pool)?
e) Removal of viable, mature trees based 0 0 [8J 0
on information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form and verified by site
survey/evaluation (6" or greater trunk
diameter at 4' above the ground)?
f) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL
RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy 0 0 0 [8J
conservation plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a 0 0 0 [8J
wasteful and inefficient manner?
c
IS 8
(-
'-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
c
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
ImDact Incoroorated lmDact No lmDact
c) Result in the loss of availability of a 0 0 0 [8J
known mineral resource that would be
of future value to the region and the
residents of the State?
IX. HAZARDS. Will the proposal:
a) Use, store, transport or dispose of 0 0 [8J 0
hazardous or toxic materials based on
information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form No. G(J) and G(2) (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b) Involve the release of hazardous 0 0 0 ~
substances?
c) Expose people to the potential 0 0 0 [8J
health/safety hazards?
d) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
X. NOISE. Could the proposal result in:
a) Development of housing, health care 0 0 0 [8J
facilities, schools, libraries, religious
facilities or other noise sensitive uses
in areas where existing or future noise
levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A)
exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A)
interior as identified in Section 14.0,
Noise, Figures 57 and 58, of the City's
General Plan?
{~
\..-
IS 9
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
c
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imoact Incorporated Imoact No Imoact
b) Development of new or expansion of 0 0 0 [8J
existing industrial, commercial or other
uses which generate noise levels above
an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn
of 45 dB(A) interior that may affect
areas containing housing, schools,
health care facilities or other sensitive
uses based on information in the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form No. G(l) and evaluation of
surrounding land uses No. C, and
verified by site survey/evaluation?
c) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal
have an effect upon, or result in a need for
new or altered government services in any
of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 0 [8J 0
b) Medical aid? 0 0 [8J D
c) Police protection? 0 0 [8J 0
d) Schools? 0 0 0 [8J
e) Parks or other recreational facilities? 0 0 D [8J
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 [8J 0
g) Maintenance of public facilities, 0 0 [8J 0
including roads?
h) Other governmental services? 0 0 ~ 0
XII. UTILmES. Will the proposal, based on
the responses of the responsible Agencies,
Departments, or Utility Company, impact
the following beyond the capability to
provide adequate levels of service or
require the construction of new facilities?
a) Natural gas? 0 0 [8J 0
c
IS 10
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
c
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imnact Incomorated imnact No Imnact
b) Electricity? 0 0 [8J 0
c) Communications systems? 0 0 0 [8J
d) Water distribution? 0 0 [8J 0
e) Water treatment or sewer? 0 0 [8J 0
f) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 [8J
g) Result in a disjointed pattem of utility 0 0 0 [8J
extensions based on review of existing
pattems and proposed extensions?
h) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
XIII. AESTHETICS.
a) Could the proposal result in the 0 0 0 [8J
obstruction of any significant or
important scenic view based on
evaluation of the view shed verified by
site survey/evaluation?
b) Will the visual impact of the project 0 0 0 [8J
create aesthetically offensive changes
in the existing visual setting based on a
site survey and evaluation of the
proposed elevations?
c) Create significant light or glare that 0 0 0 [8J
could impact sensitive receptors?
d) Other? 0 0 0 ~
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Could the
proposal result in:
a) Development in a sensitive 0 0 [8J 0
archaeological area as identified in
Section 3.0, Historical, Figure 8, of the
City's General Plan?
c
IS 11
c
.",...-
l...
/""'-
\.-.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Tmnact Incoroorated Imnact No Imnact
b) The alteration or destruction of a 0 0 D [8J
prehistoric or historic archaeological
site by development within an
archaeological sensitive area as
identified in Section 3.0, Historical,
Figure 8, of the City's General Plan?
c) Alteration or destruction of a historical 0 0 D [8J
site, structure or object as listed in the
City's Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey?
d) Other? 0 0 D [8J
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood 0 0 0 [8J
or regional parks or other recreational
facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational 0 D D [8J
opportunities?
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 [8J
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 D [8J
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
of long-term, environmental goals?
IS 12
c
c
c
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imnact Incomorated Imnact No Imnact
c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 [8J 0
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental 0 0 0 [8J
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
IS 13
c
r-
'-
r
'-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
REFERENCES. The following references cited in the Initial Study are on file in the Development
Services Department.
1. City of San Bernardino General Plan.
2. City of San Bernardino Development Code (Title 19 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code).
3. City of San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey.
4. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones Map.
S. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
6. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
7. Public Works Standard Requirements-water.
8. Public Works Standard Requirements-grading.
DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIED CHECKLIST RESPONSES.
No items on the checklist require discussion.
IS 14
SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION
CASE:
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
AGENDA ITEM:
HEARING DATE:
WARD:
4
August 7, 2001
2
OWNER:
Pastor David Kalke
Central City Lutheran Mission
1354 No. 'G' Street
San Bernardino CA 92405
(909) 381-6921
APPLICANT:
Doug Andresen
Andresen Architects
1771 S. Arrow Blvd.
Fontana CA 92335
(909) 355-6688
REQUEST/LOCA TlON:
A request to establish a social service center and to construct four new buildings totaling 16,305
square feet on the premises of the Central City Lutheran Mission. The proposed buildings will
include a Multi-Purpose Facility, Classrooms, residence/offices, a clinic and 102 off-street
shared parking spaces. The 2.8-acre site is located at 1354 N. 'G' Street in the RU-2, Residential
Urban and RM, Residential Medium land use districts.
CONSTRAINTS/OVERLA YS:
None
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS:
o Not Applicable
o Exempt
. No Significant Effects, Proposed Negative Declaration
o Potential Effects, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
. Approval
. Conditions
o Denial
o . Continuance to:
1f3~
ID-f-ol
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A request to establish a social service center and to construct four new buildings totaling 16,305
square feet on the premises of the Central City Lutheran Mission (CCLM). The proposed
buildings will include a Multi-Purpose Facility, Classrooms, residence/offices, a clinic and 102
off-street shared parking spaces (Attachment B). The proposed project is located in the RU-2,
Residential Urban and RM, Residential Medium land use districts (Attachment A).
SETTING/SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The site is flat and partially developed with the church and single family homes. The portion of
the site that is proposed for the new development is vacant. The surrounding land uses include to
the north and east, multi-family apartments in the RU-2, Residential Urban land use district, to
the south, single-family homes in the RU-2, Residential Urban land use district, to the west are
single-family homes in the IL, Industrial Light land use district on the west side of 'H' Street.
EXPANDED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project has been designed to be a project in a community, for the community, with
the community. The majority of the participants in the CCLM programs are within walking
distance to the site. The following is a detailed description of the new facilities and proposed
uses:
Multi-Purpose Facility: A recreational and community center (3,240 square feet) will offer a
meeting room for up to 250 persons, indoor basketball and showering facilities for participants.
The facility will be open for neighborhood cultural events, dinners and activities. The center will
be open Monday - Friday from 3:00 pm to 9:00 pm, Saturdays from 10:00 am to 9:00 pm and
Sundays from 10:00 am - 9:00 pm, providing supervised recreational activities during non-
traditional hours for teens and pre-teens.
Commnnications Center (Classrooms): This educational unit (4,028 square feet) will serve
two functions. The first function will be the addition of four classrooms expanding the space
available for Central City Lutheran Mission's (CCLM) after school program. The second
function will be a state-of-the-art computer laboratory that will include an apprenticeship
program for older teens with training in desktop publishing, internet skills, computer hardware
and software and the use of a web press. The educational unit will be open Monday - Friday
8:30 am to 6:00 pm. The apprenticeship program will incorporate adolescents and young adults
in a supervised training program. The training program will involve six to ten students at a time,
operating until 5 :30 pm. Additionally, the center will serve as a site for an after school program
serving neighborhood youth ages 5 - 12 from 3:30 pm to 6:00 pm. The estimated average
attendance is 50 children in the program.
Residence/Office for Interns: The residence facility (1,662 square feet) will house graduate
students and interns from schools of social work, public health and theology. Up to six students
will be housed for year-long internships while they work in the Mission's urban programs.
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 3
Facilities for shorter term clerical sabbaticals will also be available. Up to six adult graduate
students/interns will be housed for the CCLM's urban programs in this unit at a time. This area
will be their private residential facility while on staff with Central City Lutheran Mission. Each
staff person will be assigned a room, with kitchen, dining and living spaces being shared.
Medical Clinic: The Community Oriented Primary Care Facility (6,384 square feet) is designed
to serve the uninsured and the underinsured in the immediate neighborhood. Owned by CCLM,
the clinic will be operated by a professional health care facility which will partner its efforts to
provide health care and health education. The services will be provide by trained professionals
and will be open Monday - Friday, 8:30 am to 6:00 pm. This primary care facility will not
house an internal pharmacy; however, vaccines and medications used by the primary care
physicians in their day to day treatment of the community will be safely secured in the facility)
and will not be used for the dispensation of medications.
Amphitheater: The proposed project also includes an amphitheater and courtyard for outdoor
activities. Some of the activities that may occur in the amphitheater include weddings, plays,
classes and barbecues. Condition of Approval NO.7 has been added to limit the outdoor
activities from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm so as to not disturb the residential uses surrounding the site.
The Development Code does not allow all of the proposed uses in residential land use
districts. A Development Code Amendment is proposed concurrently by the City (DCA-
00-01) to change the Development Code to establish social service users/centers with
approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, although all of the proposed functions
of the social service center do not currently conform to the definitions and standards
included in the Development Code, the proposed DCA will provide the standards that the
proposed project will meet.
BACKGROUND
The Development/Environmental Review Committee (D/ERC) conducted a preliminary review
of the project on June 8, 2000. The D/ERC recommended revisions to the project and the
preparation of an Initial Study. The D/ERC reviewed the revisions to the project and the Initial
Study on June 7, 2001. The Initial Study for a proposed Negative Declaration was circulated for
a 20-day public review period, beginning on June 14,2001 and ending on July 3, 2001
(Attachment F). No comments were received during the review period and on July 5,2001 the
D/ERC moved the project to the Planning Commission.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1. Is the proposed use conditionally permitted within, and would not impair the integrity
and character of the subject land use district, and does it comply with all of the
applicable"provisions of this Development Code?
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 4
Yes, the proposed project complies with all of the development standards proposed in
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01 for Social Service Uses/Centers. If the
Conditional Use Permit is approved the proposed uses will comply with all applicable
provisions of the Development Code and General Plan as shown in Table A below,
except for the parking requirements:
TABLE A - Develooment Code/General Plan Conformance
CATEGORY PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN
CODE
Permitted Use Social Services Center Permitted subject to N/A
annrova1 of DCA 00-01
Height 26 foot maximum height 2.5 story 2.5-story
35-feet 35-feet
Setbacks
- Front 26 feet 25 feet N/A
- Rear 20.75 feet 10 feet N/A
Landscaping 42.5%--39,386 square feet 15% of the surface parking N/A
area
Lot Coverage 23.7% 40% N/A
Parking
- Standard 96 spaces' 186 spaces N/A
- Handicap 6 spaces 6 spaces
*
The applicant has submitted a parking analysis of similar projects to justify the reduced parking
requirement. See discussion under Finding No.5 and Attachment E.
2.
Is the proposed use consistent with the General Plan?
Yes, General Plan GoallA states, that it is the goal of the City of San Bernardino to:
"Provide for the continuation and development of sufficient land use to serve the
housing, commercial, educational, cultural, recreational, and social needs of
existing residents and population growth" .
The proposed project will provide social, educational, medical, and religious services that
are not currently available to the residents in that area. It will also provide a focal point
for the community.
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 5
3. Is the approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use in
compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code?
Yes, an Initial Study was prepared, as was described in the background of the report. No
public comments were received and a Negative Declaration is proposed for this project.
4. Are there potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality
and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored?
No, all impacts were review through the Initial Study and none were identified as having
the potential for negative impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is
proposed for this project (Attachment F).
5. Are the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use
compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in
which the proposed use is to be located and will it create significant noise,
traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental
to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience, or welfare of the City?
Yes, the applicant proposes to establish a social service center and to construct four new
buildings, totaling 16,305 square feet on the premises of the Central City Lutheran
Mission, which is on 2.8 acres. The buildings include a Multi-Purpose Facility,
Classrooms, residence, a clinic and 102 off-street shared parking spaces.
The proposed project complies with the development standards proposed for social
Service Uses/Centers and the Development Code/General Plan Conformance Standards
as defined in Table A except for the number of parking spaces required.
The proposed project includes a total of 8 buildings. The existing 4 building and the
proposed 4 new buildings. The buildings and parking requirements are:
Church Sanctuary
Multi-Purpose Center
Classrooms/Comm Ctr
Clinic
Residence/office
Homeless shelter
Aids shelter
House
Total parking required
Total parking proposed
1,890 square feet
2,326 square feet
six classrooms
6,384 square feet
6 rooms
1,831 square feet
903 square feet
54 parking spaces
67 parking spaces
12 parking spaces
45 parking spaces
6 parking spaces
o parking spaces
o parking spaces
2 parking spaces
186 parking spaces
102 parking spaces
Conditional Use Pennit No. DO-II
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 6
The applicant has submitted a parking analysis including two similar projects to justify
the reduced parking requirement (Attachment E). In each case there were vacant parking
spaces. This project is providing 51% of the required parking. The 51 % is more than is
provided at other similar projects, and all of the projects have unused parking spaces.
The adjustment is based on the fact that the majority of the people that utilize this facility
don't have cars and live in the neighborhood and can easily walk to the site.
Development Code Amendment No. 00-01 provision No.4 allows for shared parking. It
is assumed that not all of the uses on the site would be going on at the same time and that
parking can be shared depending on the event-taking place at the time.
The project will not create significant noise, traffic, or other conditions or situations
that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or
adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The
project will result in less residential density, exceeds the landscaping requirements and
will have a solid six foot fence around the portions of the property that abut residential
uses.
6. Is the subject site physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use
being proposed?
Yes, the site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being
proposed as evidenced by project compliance with all applicable Development Code
Standards as noted above in Table A except for the parking. Development Code ~
19.24.030 (6) allows for use not specifically listed to be determined by the Director based
on the requirements for comparable uses and the particular characteristics of the use. The
amount of parking proposed exceeds the requirements of similar uses.
7. Are there adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public
utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to
public health and safety?
Yes, all agencies responsible for reviewing access, and providing water, sanitation and
other public services have all had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none have
indicated an inability to serve the project. The proposal will not be detrimental to the
public health and safety in that all applicable Codes will apply to the construction of this
project.
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 7
CONCLUSION
The proposal meets all necessary Findings of Fact for approval of Conditional Use Permit No.
00-11.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Cornmon Council;
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration and;
2. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11, based upon the Findings of Fact contained in
this Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard
Requirements (Attachment D).
Respectfully Submitted,
J~(;/~r:JP
Director of Development Services
~ ,8~.._#1,.
~andi
Senior Planner
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Attachment D
Attachment E
Attachment F
Location Map
Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plans
Conditions of Approval
Standard Requirements
Applicants parking analysis
Initial Study
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: CUP 00-11
PLANNING DIVISION
LOCATION MAP
LAND USE DISTRICTS HEARING DATE: 8/7/01
u
NORTH
~. '"-"'" ?=:f "~I I
I ~ ~ . I
l(J~ . :," .
I H_DO'=~ ";: ,{L.- "\
:Q ,y. .
... j[ ~..1--.L I " ~II
I. 'T.' ......~"" ~ '...'D~
'-:'" I I r · ~'
,.. L.t ,."
ICJeJ G2 rr,. 1 ~ ta...., .'. ~ I~
L ._~~ IG:: ~,r~j~ r- ~! ,"~'! II
~ /' H ~ ~ ~ - virginia Ave ~i .. I I 1:l~rr- od~ I
~ ~ ~ - lIll ''''---"- 'lJ 1....J ),. ..
~ N ~ 1'...... ~ ~ - c7> I r- . r. ~O
~ I~ J.1lIlI I~~ J: q;113thStreetr1-~I..~ r"".
I~- ~~ -,I...J N "~lI?'-rlJ;I!r g~(II.1
T ! 1:111...... - ' rIll ~ ~UtZ~ ,i: I 4f ~1l {!X1,.,
. ~I; ,- l~"''''' .j I II ~.. I;,! ~L.Ji I
~~. _ _ .. R~ .., eM ~ "Il~,--,
IL Sf M ""..., I I ~ _L r'l J ji
! I 2..M! · .. ~ -',t'lt tI _:r; ~ jl
T -! I:r-~
...J A /-7<>"V' II ,. .'ZJ.. . ~ ~':-.JI
~ l- "-.Vj l:J1 J: I , !i
~ 1t:1 -~~" I CJ::~- JI..I~~m0
t J[[3I..'u JW~ 1,.~IDlJ
LAA~Z ~ nrJ n - .: .J I -; ,":':- It...l- ~
~j ~. Lit ~Iv
fi]eJ
[mllTONI ~ ~"...
I _'~ . Iii =
J . :' l\
,G;J - -,
I
..
,...
.TT
I .. I
l~
~
'i :
~
v
..
o~
:1
::0 l::
J ~
l~ ...
!O I a :::
I]. ~ i: Vl
S .
n~ !I!l: :
!. ! I ~i I ' ~fi, ii . iiiilii! l.Uil i i: j. ,: i: i: i1 I' :;
j, Iii .!l!! ! , it ' I I ,I r.' I' ! II II "I 'I II Ii ,I .1
~i'l Iii ,i!< fiG , , " . . . ;. 'ill.!!.' I.. U I.: I.. ....I.:.I.! "
!i . i' "l '1 '.1
; I . I ' i".'
100Ii Ii ,:11 .-, !,
.!111I ,II ." I .li.! I.'.. .
i.1 - I- "L I ; 1 i I
i II ~ il illlili iimil! Iii 1Illliiulilliiuli,llilllllllllli
--.......-....---..-----.......-.....----.-...-.---......-- --.-,.,...-......-...-..-----...-",
,-;T"fTTn
1 €I Ul..JJJ €)
I I @l ~.--1
~~lL~1=.~ ~,
l~.~ t F' ~ i
'-1 ~. ..
i~- i_=1
t.."l._L::j
i I
I . I p
I I
I I
...l..-L_.
'.
:1
~
, :i
,'.
/1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
i
i
1!
:~l
:~;
:-SI
:1
l,ii
/:i
I:i
,:.
~ : I
\Ii
:~
ri
~j
'.
:1
1i
\i:i
:'
:1
,ii
:1
:,
Ii i
e It: i
.' _' I I :j
. ..... 0_' . .
'I. ,. f. . \; ,. i i
-. -~-. -l!r.-.5.-.-----.-..:~-.-.-~.~;Uit.-JIl.:il.---.-.-.-.l!-.it;--
ill; r 1 ;!!l r
,
i
I'
1
1
i
i
i
1
.
>
<,
<.
!\
:.
>
'"
1
Ii
11:1,
i
i
i
i
.i
I
1
i
i
1
1
1
1
IIi
'i
e
.
€)
.
~
.
e
.
e
.
.'
I,
~
.
,.
0 ~ "
;,; '! I
:0: 8. h
l:
.!! fl. gC I
~ r.H ... !.
"- '" !
... J~~n 'It Qb<)
.c ~ J 1:-::
l:
.!! mu ~ ::I'"
>< '- f:! Q.,:!:!
lJ..l ::t -.a--
!IHj Cl:l IS I
~ -;:
III ~ ;:CXl
~ 1m S' . ~
__.....~_____.._..___........-........_.__._..._.___.._--- __......,___..___..______.(31
t1
-
>>. >>.. ('
I e
\, , i
\
e
~
.~ 0
~2
......-:r:.
..........r-..:r:.
0~
-~?;
~
'- ...I ~
~
,
i .. . ~
'1: i. h
~ ~li~l
.~ 1~~~J
~ mU
'"
] ~d!J
!'- lIU,
o
'" i
.. ~
::0 I
:s -ll
'" t~
"l f'~' ~ i
,5" .
Ebo
CJ::
C'-
..'1:1
V):;:
Vl_
0::1-
-ll:l
U
~
I
~
__...._____.._""_.__ ...-........ ...__._..._.__........__ __......'______.___,___~_f5\
l
t e e
i i
. t ! ~; ;)
t ~
II->
t
~. ..!i . . ~ 0
.. !. h
'1:
. ~ ~Ji~l
. j
1 ~ ~
. .. 1M! :l;
. <> f!' E
~ 'S mu
- ~ ..
... .
UJ ';; l~
] !dll I:Q I~' } ~
f-. !U! ~ .
I:;
~!
,,,,~
E'M
~'"
....::
;:c:l
.....:x:
--~~-----.........._-_...._........-...__._...._......_......._--_.-......-.._--....-.---..-""""-..;. I
e I
I
,
i
i .,
i
I
z
e
~o(
...
~
~
i
.i
'1
I
I
f' Vi , . ~ @
:<: !. I~
I:
~ e!,it II
~ ""
.. I .,
.. iMi r?
Q I
'1:
~ HW :s!
... '" d
LIJ d CCl
~ !iJ Ii
II ·
f'.o hul .s :
'-(' ~?
.--- ;:g1~ I
'. L') "
"'- .....,.:;
'~ " .; {
- .., -:;
-. .::. .J":::-
/ ~
to
I
U
'M
;:
'M
-
U
__......._..._____"_.__....~...___.__.._...._.___,......___ __._.._.._.....___...._______rt
,
,
--
'"
,
\
r
.
.
~i ~; \
r
4; ~ .
.
,
t
,
. e
,
.
e j~ i
t
~j ~j j~
-
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7. 2001
Page 10
ATTACHMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
for
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
1. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction shall have
occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after
commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the
permit/approval shall become nul1 and void. Phasing of project
construction/development shall be as follows:
Expiration Date: August 7, 2003
2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration
date and for good cause, grant a one-time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review
authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code
provisions.
3. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter.
Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, the
Economic Development Agency, their affiliates officers, agents and employees from any
claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further
agrees to reimburse the City and the Economic Development Agency of any costs and
attorneys' fees which the City or the Economic Development Agency may be required by
a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant
of his or her obligation under this condition.
4. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the planes) approved by the
Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and
Common Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be subject to approval by the
Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds
10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the
refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing
review authority if applicable:
a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping;
b. Placement and/or height ofwal1s, fences and structures;
c. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of
finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme; and,
d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project.
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Meeting Date: August 7, 2001
Page 11
S. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shal1 be occupied or
no change of use ofland or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business
commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the
Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed
with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate, if necessary.
The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all
terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit.
6. This permit or approval is subject to al1 the applicable provisions of the Development
Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property
Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and
grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air
pollution; glare control; exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor control;
screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control.
Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are
complied with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or
meter cabinets shal1 be architectural1y screened by wal1 or structural element, blending
with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground.
7. Al1 uses of the facility shall be conducted completely within an enclosed structure, except
for those activities conducted in the Amphitheater. The activities conducted in the
Amphitheater shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 am to 8:00 pm.
8. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the
following City Departments or Divisions:
a. Public Works Division
b. Plan Check Division
c. Fire Department
d. Public Services Department
e. Parks Recreation & Community Services Department
f. Municipal Water Department
g. Water Reclamation
ATTACHMENf "D"
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF uG"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
. NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the applicant is
responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They
may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans.
1. Drainaae and Flood Control
a) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public
drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
b) If site drainage is to be outletted into the public street, the drainage shall
be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with
City Standard No. 400. Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway
approaches will not be permitted.
c) Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to
maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge
Permit Requirements. A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the
State Water Quality Control Board for construction disturbing 5 acres of
more of land.
d) The City Engineer, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an
Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due
to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of
construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be
immediately built upon.
Page 1 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
ST AN.DARD REQUIR~MENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
2. Grading and LandscaDina
a) If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and
drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a
grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in
strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and
the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
b) If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit
conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the Development
Code shall be obtained from the Department of Development Services-
Planning Division prior to issuance of any grading or site development
permits.
c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond
will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with
Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code.
d) If more than 1,000 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets
then a special hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer.
Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls,
bonding, covering of loads, street cleaning, etc. may be required by the
City Engineer.
e) A liquefaction evaluation is required for the site. This evaluation must be
submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any
grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction
evaluation shall be incorpor~ted .in the grading plan.
Page 2 of 9 Pages
7/912001
STA~DARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
f) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible,
this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to
all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See
"Grading Policies and Procedures").
g) A refuse enclosure constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing
No. 508. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15
feet, unless the Public Services Department, Refuse Division, approves a
smaller size, in writing.
h) Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and
detailed on the On-site Improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the
On-site Improvement permit issued by the City Engineer.
i) The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting,
including light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design,
conduit location and size, and the number and size of conductors.
Photometry calculations shall be provided which show that the proposed
on-site lighting design will provide 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly
distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation
and 0.25 foot-candles security lighting during all other hours.
j) The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all
requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to
handicap parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing
building access points for handicap accessibility, if applicable.
k) A handicap accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way
to the building entrance. All pathways shall be concrete paved and shall
provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the
pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6 feet.
Page 3 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
51 ANDARD REQUI~EMEN1S
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICESIPUBLlC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
I) Where the handicap accessible path of travel crosses drive aisles, it shall
be delineated by striping or textured/colored concrete pavement.
m) A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if
reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, andlor parking is proposed to cross
lot lines, or a lot merger shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines.
n) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the
Engineering Division for Checking.
0) The public right-of-way, between the property line and top of curb (also
known as "parkway") along adjoining streets shall be landscaped by the
developer and maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. Details of
the parkway landscaping shall be included in the project's on-site
landscape plan.
p) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to
allow the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of
owner neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property
owner and shall ensure that, if the property owner or subsequent owner(s)
fail to properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file
appropriate liens against the property in order to accomplish the required
landscape maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of
$200.00 shall be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing
costs. The property owner, prior to plan approval, shall execute this
easement and covenant unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer.
Page 4 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
3. Utilities
a) Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with
City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility,
including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV
optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses).
b) Backflow preventers shall be installed for any building with the finished
floor elevation below the rim elevation of the nearest upstream manhole.
c) This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of
San Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's .Sewer Policy and
Procedures" and City Standard Drawings.
d) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as
required.
e) A street cut permit, from the City Engineer, will be required for utility cuts
into existing streets where the street is not being repaved as part of the
required improvements. .
f) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either
side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Section
19.20.030 (non-subdivisions of the Development Code.
g) Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at
the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except
overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be
undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030 (non-
subdivisions). .
Page 5 of 9 Pages
71912001
STANPARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P, NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
h) As an alternative to undergrounding required by Section 19.20.030 (non-
subdivision) of the Development Code, the developer will provide a letter
of agreement for participation in an assessment district, if one is formed,
to fulfill the requirement for undergrounding utilities. Prior to recordation
of a map or issuance of building permit subdivider/developer shall have
the letter of agreement recorded with the deed.
i) Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained
by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and
inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan
designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer
will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where
practical.
4. Street ImDrovement and Dedications
a) All public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be
improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps,
street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to
traffic signals, traffic signal modifications, relocation of public or private
facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, shall be
accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street
Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting
Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street
improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
Page 6 of 9 Pages
7/912001
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
b) For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of way
(R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and
placement of the curb line(C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be
as follows:
Street Name Right of Wav(ft.) Curb Linelft)
"G" STREET 41.25' (EXISTING) 25.75' (EXISTING)
"H" STREET 30' (EXISTING) 20' (EXISTING)
VIRGINIA AVENUE 30.0' (EXISTING) 20' (EXISTING)
c) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb).
d) Construct Handicap Ramps in accordance with City Standard No. 205 at
all curb retums within and adjacent to the project site. Dedicate sufficient
right-of-way at the corner to accommodate the ramp.
e) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type II,
including Handicap by-pass. Remove existing driveway approaches that
are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter
and sidewalk. .
f) Install Street Lights adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
Nos. SL-1 and SL-2.
Page 7 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U,P. NO, 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
5. Reauired Enaineerina Permits
a) Grading permit (If applicable.).
b) On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see
Development Services-Building Division), including landscaping.
c) Off-site improvements construction permit.
6. Applicable Enaineerina Fees1
a) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 4% and 4%,
respectively, of the estimated construction cost2 of the off-site
improvements.
b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings
- See Development Services-Building Division) - 2% and 3%, respectively,
of the estimated construction cose of the on-site improvements, including
landscaping.
c) Plan check and inspection fees for grading (If permit required) - Fee
Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter.
I All Fees are subject to change without notice.
'Est/mated Construct/on Cost for Off-Site Improvements Is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with
the Public Works Division.
, Est/mated Construct/on Cost for On-Site Improvements Is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with
the Public Works Division.
Page 8 of 9 Pages
7/912001
~TANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CASE NO: C.U.P. NO. 00-11 DESCRIPTION: ESTABLISH A SOCIAL
SERVICES CENTER
APPLICANT: CENTRAL LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF "G"
CITY LUTHERAN CHURCH STREET AND VIRGINIA AVENUE
d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount as follows based on $0.429 per
square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area (estimated
as 85% of the net lot area), then $0.147 per square foot of remaining
impervious lot area or fraction thereof: $10,614.30
e) Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of -.$5.285.75 . Based on
309 trips per day @ $17.106 per new trip generated by the project. The
City Traffic Engineer shall determine exact amount at time of application
for Building Permit.
f) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount as follows based on
$242.91 per 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof: $1,457.46
g) Sewer inspection fee in the estimated amount as follows based on $20.48
per connection: $20.48
Page 9 of 9 Pages
7/9/2001
/'
City of San Bernardino
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Development Services/Plan Check Division
Date:I-10 -0 I
Property address /3 t? 4- t-.J ~ ~ zf
1. Submit 4 sets of plans, minimum size 18" x 24", drawn to scale. If plan check is for
expeditious review, submit 5 sets. The plans shall include (if applicable):
a, site plan (include address & assessors parcel number)
b. foundation plan
c. floor plan (label use ofall areas)
d, elevations
e, electrical, mechanical, & plumbing plans
f. detail sheets (structural)
g, cross section details
h, show compliance with Title 24/Accessibility (disabled access)
1. a plan check deposit fee will be required upon submittal of plans.
Call Development Services (plan check) 909-384-5071 for amount.
2. The title sheet of the plans must specify the occupancy classification, type of construction, if
the building has sprinklers, & the current applicable codes.
3. The person who prepares them must sign the plans. Also, provide the address & phone
number ofthat person. Some types of occupancies require that the plans are prepared,
stamped, and signed by an architect, engineer, or other person licensed by the State of
California.
4, For structures that must include an engineers design, provide 2 sets of stamped/wet signed
calculations prepared by a licensed architect/engineer.
5. Provide 2 sets of Title 24/Energy compliance forms and calculations. Some compliance
forms are required to be printed on the plans.
6. Submit grading, site, and/or landscape plans to Public Works/Engineering for plan check
approval and permits, For more information, phone 909-384-5111.
7, Fire sprinkler plans, fires suppression system plans, etc., shall be submitted to the Fire
Department for plan check approval and permits. For information, phone 909-384-5388.
8. Signs require a separate submittal to the Planning Division for plan check approval and
permits. For information, phone 909-384-5057,
9. Restaurants, food preparation facilities, and some health related occupancies will require
clearances and approved plans from San Bernardino County Health Department. For
information, phone 909-387-3043.
10. Occupancies that include restaurants, car washes, automotive repair/auto body, dentist
offices, food preparation facilities or processing plants, etc. may require approvals and
permits from San Bernardino Water Reclamation. For information, phone 909-384-5141.
11. An air quality permit may be required. Contact South Coast Air Quality Management
Division for information, phone 909-396-2000.
12, State of California Business & Professions Code/Contractors License Law reqnires that
permits can be issued to licensed contractors or owner-builders (that are doing the work).
Contractors must provide their State license number, a city business registration, and
workers compensation policy carrier & policy number. Owner-builders must provide
proof of ownership.
NOTE: PLAN CHECK TIME ON THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS IS APPROXIMATELY 3-4
WEEKS FOR 1ST CORRECTIONS. EXPEDITIOUS REVIEW IS APPROXIMATELY 10
WORKING DAYS. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS IS NOT THE BUILDING
PLAN CHECK AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE DESIGN AS SUBMITTED WILL BE
APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
. . ~.'
CITY OF ",AN BERNARDINO FIRE D~"'ARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Casa: ~?<~- O()-//
C:-, n /., .', v--'- .{ Data: C; - / v ~ '/
- -/3 sy ;J. 1(:;; // Reviewad By: 2>!J
GEllERAL REQUIREMENTS: .
lY'" Provide one eddltlonellOt of construction "ene to Building and Safety for Fire Depanment uaa at time of plan check. .
o Contact the City of San Bomardlno Fire Department at (9091 384-5388 for .pecific detailed requirement..
o The developer .heD provIcfa for adequate fire flow II computed by the fire Prevantlon Bure.u. Minimum fire flow r=rementa _be_d
on square footage. conatructlon teeturea. and exposure infonnetlon supplied by the devel_ and IIIIIIl be evaneble to placing _otible
materials on site.
WATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION:
o The fire protection water service for the ar.a of this project Is provided by:
o San Bernardino Municipal Wet" Department. Engineering /9091 394-5391
o Ea.t Valley Wet.. District. Engineering (909) 888-8986
o Other Water Purveyor:
Phone:
't'
PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES:
~ Public fire hydrwn .. required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 fMt for commercial and multi-residential area. and at intervals not
-A6 exceed 500 flet for residenti.1 .r....
(]"'"" FIre hydrant minimum flow rat.. of 1.500 gpm at . 20 p.i minimum re.ldua' preaaura are raqulred for commercial and multl-re.ldantlal or....
Minimum fh hydrant flow rates of 1,000 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pre....re are required for residentl.1 area..
o Fwe flow requirementa mey be met from the combined flow of two adjacent fire hydranta. Fire flow raqulrementa may be edjusted. es deemed
......appropri.te by the Fire Department. besed on Individual site apeclflc conditJone and .vailable mltlgatlone.
[!"" Fire hydrant typo and specific location shaD be jointly determined by the City of San ~rnardino Fire Dep.rtment in conjunction with the watar
. Jl'""Purveyor. Fire hydrant materials and installation shall conform to the standard. and specifications of the water purveyor.
~ Public fire hydrant., fire .ervices, and public water facilitie. necel8ary to meet Fire Department requirements are the developer's financial
responsibility and shall be Installed by the water purveyor or by the developer at the water purveyor', discretion. Contact the water purveyor
indicated above for additional information.
-,
ACCESS:
3': Provide two separate, dedicated routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance; The rout.. ahan be paved, all weather.
~ Provide an 8Cceu road to HCh buNding for fire apparatus. Access roadway shali have an all-weather driving surface of nc:tt less than 20 f.et
../ of unobstructed width.
cr Extend ro.dway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wan of all .ingle story buildings.
I::J/ Extend roadway to within 50 faet of the extarlor wall of all multiple-story buildings.
I::r Provide -NO PARKWQ- aigna whenever parking of vahicle. would pos.ibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to leu than the required
width. Sign. are to reed "FIRE LANE - NO PARKINO - M.C. Sac 16.111". .
o Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500 f8.t in length and shan_ have a minimum :40 foot radius turnaround.
o The names of any new streets (public or private) .hall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval.
,
S[tE: . .
~ All acee.. raids and street. are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction.
l!I" ~ hydranta ahall be installed to protect aach building located more than 150 leet from the curb line. No lira hydrants should be within
~ any exterior waB. The hydrants shall be Wet BarnI type, with one 2'/z inch and 4 inch outlet, and approved by the Fir. Oepanment.
Flra hydrant. shall be daslgneted as a "NO PARKINO" zone by painting an 8 In!;/1 Wid,. red stripe fa. r 15 t.et! in each di~lon In front of the
hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicfes. - C v ~ I,. o.:.....t Ii , ;;.... . _,~~, 7' /1 r ;/' /.. (....L. ~
BUIlDINGS:
[j' Addreta numerals shall be instIlled on the building It the front or other approved location in ..uch a manner as to be visible from the frontage
street. Commercial and multi family address numerals shall be 6 Inches tall, single family address numerals shall be 4 inches tall. The color
. ...... of the numer.l. .hall contrast with the color of the background.
r![./ Identify each gn and electric meter with the number of the unit it lIf'Ve..
[!""" m ExtinguiIhera must be Installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 1GB/C. Minimum
distribution of fire axtinguisher. must be such that no interior part of the building II over 76 feet travel distance from a fire .xtinguisher.
o Apartment-hOuses with 16 or more units, hotels (motels) with 20 or more units, or apartments or hotels (motels) tIT.. stories or more In height
shall be equipped with automatic fire .prinkle... ..igned to NFPA standards.
o All buildings. other than residential, over 5.000 squ8re_f'~.lllbe equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA
../ standard.. This includes existing buildings vacant over' 365 days.
I!J"" Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction of the system.
o __Tenant Improvement. in all sprlnklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Oeplrtment prior to start of construction.
r Provide fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fir. Depanment prior to start of installation.
o Rre Oepanment connection to Isprinkler system/standpipe .yltem} .hall be required at Fire Depanment approved location.
Note: The applicant must request, in writin~. any change. to Fire Department requirements.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 5// r ,,' fL.::"'-. J . F.J, ... ' ,..-~.j <~ .-,.....-v '-
... I /1' 6'" /
_ '.),- fit' ( c.,_ - / '-"' '- <- ' J J ,'" b. c:/ i j - .s- / bt.
, '-"
,; .- '. ;,:', \ .__' (_;II.-_ I. "-_
Ij
.))
f"(
l...,/
<::
,~ ~
S- 1 7 (/"~ ,.(
t,J <L....-
<.....
/)~{.....
h
;l)
/i)
c)
i~
".-(:. d
C/.,,--
-<.
r "J,. - If
---
LAL/'
,("", "
) ''''';9
-../
/v. '- .,'.}
1;),_'7V-""-'"<.-
h'
,
_\v.?' "..
(
j .J"
'/
.
/~"r'';''''
'-u_ i--<--.
~-.'c..-"-""""
:-p l,. .....1 - <!-'/~ i:
,
I ",__.l.--<..._ .i~
J. ::.-....
Ie (
-I
:j
(-" .'
. -.' " ,,' ,....<. '-
j., ~' i~ -...
~'
t.;.
;' . . ~~ '.....-.. -./
/,'.
.- )
J.
/"c...-l.M
.r /.)..
-1.
j.i,.
y.
~-," 'r-!.L. -
FP8170 111.14)
----fI;::. ..."
~/ /
~;.'I
r
~ :-.....c1
CI^-'L (
,? "7'!,.
\."
.../--:::...;;{'.,'!,'
,~~~~~-
.~~::.. -- ~~-"...
~r~",~. ~'-'.~
~,~-~.."...,...
.'. ~~....~,,"
~.,< ~~ J9
..-;."-.Jh\'rt-.......~..
''7:; )~i'.r>.\~:.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PUBUC SERVICES DEPARTMENT - REFUSE & RECYCUNG DMSION
STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
300 North D Street - 4th Floor CA 92418-0001
909-384-5335
..............
Project Number ,~., \,\' (i- <, \
Project DescriplionlBusiness Name ("" ~. 7, \ I,' , '-, I __' ,'+ ",_ ~', ,
Project Location/Address \'. -' I ~ t .:
Reviewed By A \ , ___.
[Office Use Only: City SefVice Application No.
COMMERCIAL
L 1. Establish '? commercial refuse enc:Io8ure(s) according to City Pubic Works Standard 508 with a width of
.- and a IengIh of -. Location and ollenlatIon of enc:Io8ure(a). gates, and compac:tor unlt(a) shal
, be shown on Site Plana, labeled with dimensions and specilicalionII to meet I'ImIic Works Standard 508. g& ~~\ov..t.
.JJi::::" 2, Locate refuse encIosure(s) and compactor unit(s) to be safely acceesible for service vehicles and without
obslruclion to drive ai81e8, driveways, loading zones, parldng, or handicap access. EncIoIue must be at least 5'
from combu8lible _Is, eave lines, or openings (98 CA F.-e Code 1103.2.2]. Minimum radi of 40' for al drive IIm8
along the main ingress to and egress from enc:Io8ure8 and compactor pads.
3. Instal_ compactor unit(s) with a minimum capacity of _ cubic yards for each unit. Rol-off box unil(s)
shaH meet Public Works Standard 510.
4, Refuse and recycling service to this location ahal be provided by the City of San Bernardino unless otherwise
noted. New accounls requi"e a completed Senrice Application with a fuI deposit returned ty the City of San
Bernardino Refuse & Recycling Division prior to issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. i\~...rt"' ~40.A-
5. City front-load colection services ahal be eslllblished at the following minimum levels:
REFUSE SERVICE
BIN DAYS / WEEK
'-2CY
3CY
4CY
8CY
6. Sealed compactor unit(s) shal be instaled with a recommended minimum 30 cubic yard rol-off box:
unit(s) for refuse, unil(s) for commingled dry recyclables, and unit(s) for organics.
7. Applicant shal submit a completed Integrated Waste Management Survey to the Public Services Department
Refuse and Recyclng Division a minimum of 5 City work days for approval prior to issuance of any City permits.
Conlacl 909-384-55491# phone or 909-384-5190 fax.
RESIDENTIAL
1, Residential refuse and recyclng services are to be provided by the City of San Bernardino Refuse & Recycling
DIvIsion. The City shal provide one set of a blue, green, and black 96 or 64-gaBon automated seMce carts to each fl \
single family unit OR one set to every two-unit multiple family dwelIng up to six units. ,.. ~ ~W\i~
2. Residential units shal have a minimum 3 feet by 9 feet concrete pad located out of view of public right-of__y .
for storage of each set of three automated carts. Minimum gate openings shal be 3 feet, and the path of travel
from the storage pad to CtI1I shaN be continuously paved.
3, A minimum 12-foot space along the CtI1I on the street must be clear for residential automated service carts,
including a minimum 2-foot setback of al s1rucIures, fences, and raised landscaping.
4. Day of automated cart service shaH be: M @ W Th
~
.$..
1
...M!r
~
x
-'-
L
Project Planner
'.
\1",
\ .
,,'
" '.;
r'
",~ '00
Date Completed Application Retumed _ L-I---1
Review Date
RECYCLING SERVICE
QTY BIN DAYS tWEEK
~ '.2CY ,
'F 3CY /
4CY
8CY
ORGANICIIERVICE
QTY BIN DAYS/WEEK
'-2CY
3CY
4ey
8CY
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OR NOTES
I. C,\:V\rt... ~l~w-4 _ <b 4( q,'<{, Ii. Mil \H f'AM'f,..t.L eu~. ~'.,( 1, 1'1, 1'1
~~~~d!:'::" ~~~~t-_ p...\y..." . .-to~
~ADDlcMltJ /Y~ [Pink-Refuse & Rocycln1/ (CSRa)] [G~RC FIe] R._ 3.8.2000
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
/ '.:'::>5-'-/
1'/
G-
~~-
case/v_ [' 00-//
Date: "/-.-;- -0 I
Reviewed BY:~5
GENERAL REQUl:RBMBHTS:
[ ~mmercial Indu.trial and MUlti-unit
[ ] A.....ment Di.trict
[ ] Re.idential
[ ]~o.e, Guidelin.s and submittal procedure
[-1r Irrigation and Landscaping Plans.
[ I Contact the City of San Bernardino Parks,Recreation and CODIIIlUI1ity Services
Department at (909) 384-5217 or 384-5314 for specific detailed
r.quirlllll8nts.
SPECIFIC REQUl:REMBRTS:
[~ntenance of landscape are.s
[ ~ Planter Areas
[ ] ~terior Planter Area.
[~ Irrigation Systlllll8
[ ] Setback Area.
[ ] Slope Areas
[ ] Ground Cov.r and Bedding Mat.rial
[ ] Brosion Control
[ ] We.d Control
PLANT MATERIALS
[~~ list and climetic conditions
[ ~treet Tree.
[~ Plant Material Size Requirements and Ratio.
INSPECTION AND U',UU5K RBQ1JIREMBRTS
[~igation System
[~Landscaping
[ ]~ardscape Items
[-1r Street tree Specification.
[ ] Arboriat Report
[ ] Removal or destruction of tree.
[ ] Screening Requirement (City, Dev,Code)
Not.: The applicant must r.qu.st. in writing, any chang.. to the Parks, R.cr.ation and
Community Services requirem.nts. Additional information
rt"j~( . Ah;V
I
(/, V'V" ,,) /.....
/51Jr
<9 /"'''"'..,.
/
5/ .:2.C'
/Vf/c:;.c;/,"/ c::,7'/"""j..;--
4- VP '^-' ( .,. /-, .;;? '-/ d
~,.-c:::...
(' t/A A'<
/-
(;..2.'-
L(c/ f
- A<! /,./' ,,- /.a
f
:'_<_ 0;;;.
. .........
A A/;/ /"Y'7/t;:t:;/__",/
CA...I / r/, :::i f..-/ r/
,
rr"-" S; ,4/07
/s.v <;;/z-P
.
U\...I,II
I~-' r-:-$"'/A /' ~,j
f-(l A fI~ A A/-,r
/ "~yo, /~rl' ~J
;(//r, C:C:_j'
~"rr"'~ ~
"'-R /.~/,.....s.
,
7- ,-)
('r.)~ t.r:;:
MS:jj
t:::.,Y?/S""/~ 1
API'l 14-5-lq3~c;'J D~) 10, 22..-
erN UlOO-03;t.
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Review of Plans: C'.oNOI-rtONAL I1<;E PEUV\IT I'lD M-II Date Compiled:
~ANORESEI-J
OwnerlDeveJoper: c.e.NT~ fl~~UlTIteR"'N NII:5S/{)N. W.H'711!Cf'f~ll:.omPiled By:
c.6I\1Sr. () . Tar/'lI-I/,(f, /4. 305 .61( A.
Type of Project: ::l.ll ACRe SITE .t'LASsRCIJH\S.fM'/JsIN'. ..DUTWlT'l!'"' Number of Units:
. , , , c:::: JiIC-
Location: /3!f"'f /'II'JIlTH 1/ '" /. :5 r~€"F-T. 1:1 Ct'"JRttER _.
WATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING: F lib" 1V1/f'IH/A
Contact: /311_L &tl!>c,.j Phone: 3'il{-S/07 Fax: 3g/f -SS"32
Note: All Water Services are Subject to the Rules & Resulations of the Water Department.
X In r II " I/~.L 8' . '" I II ull II.,'
SizeofMainAdjacenttheProject:/n~wwG Sf. 'I MJIN bro. CJMr/Ill H.~ 0 -taT III v/tr:;INIIt-
I ,
'yf Approximate Water Pressure: '50 -/";;:<1 Elevation of Water Storage: / ~ '1-'1' Hydrant Flow@ 20 psi:
XType, Size, Location, and Distance to earest Fire Hydrant: lJ^1 1-1 s;"I1?E.l!T '\ MrI"IY fH: ilIA! (, IAI JtIr-
Sl % n f(I e-.{..u--
o Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter.
o Otf.site Water Facilities Required.
o Area Not Served by San Bernardino Mllnicipal Water Department.
)Ii Comments: . -:"y.;7\ ~
, /' .~...., .j .
" /-./ o~-'--:"~-
~I=--
WATER OUALlTY CONTROL:
Contact: (l,0}J fW~lE.rrA Phone: ::1,8"-5/39 Fax: <l:.<it1l-553:z..
;f R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. (:....~ \:1~,:"""" ~ _~\t. \~ \:::; ')
'!{ Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. P-L~, .::..:4""'- '0' rJ ~I iC.-;;'" ')
o Backflow Device to be Inspected Before Water Service can be Activated. ... \
o No Backflow Device Required at This Time.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL/INDUSTRIAL WASTE:
Contact: D/6N CASTRO
Phone: 3"& If - .5 3 g.3
Fax: 38q-~z 5Il
Note: No Brine Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed, Unless Holding and Hauling is Provided for tbe Brine. All Intercepto...
will be a 1200 Gallon Capacity with a Sanlple Box Included.
o Industrial Waste Pennit Required.
o Grease Interceptor Required.
o Pre-treatment Required.
o Sand/Oil Interceptor Required.
o No Issues at tillS Time.
SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION:
Contact: _NlE:.L IHbN\SEN
Phone: 3&4-5olf3 Fax: 3'i5/f -12./1_
Note: Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building & Safely Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit.
o No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. -tc be- dc,kf';,,,t.l
.xSewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the Water Department for A Gallons Per Day, Equivalent Dwelling Units:
)(Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building P.'~t.
Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day:
'I:'TTHII'OIIl'I'IIU'''/Q"J,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
300 NORTH "D" STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418 . (909) 384-5057
.:.
.:.
.:.
PROJECT REVIEW ROUTING
PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
Revised Initial Study
TO: Valerie C. Ross - ERC/DRC Chair Jim Gondos - Parks & Recreation
Joe Lease - Plan Check Wes Farmer - Police Department
Geri Franske - Fire Department Michelle Dyck-Turner - Public Services Department
Youo Kim - Public Works Division Sue Morales - Economic Development Agency
Anwar Wagdy - Traffic Division Councilperson Lien - City Council Ward 2
James Dye - Water Department Jim Y,'..l.Nd - Water Reclamation PI am
yAf-t/ ~....;.~
FROM: Joe Bellandi, Senior Planner -
DATE: June 18, 2001
EIDRC MEETING DATE: July 5,2001
DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A request to establish a social service center at 1354 North "G" Street.
OWNER/APPLICANT: Central City Lutheran Mission
GEN. PLAN/ZONING: RU-2, Residential Urban
APN: Various
CEQA STATUS: Subject to CEQA
COMMENTS: (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY)
SURVEYIPERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED u;a/'
SANDIOIL INTERCEPTOR REQUIRED 1200 GAL 0
GREASE INTERCEPTOR REQUIRED 1200 GAL 0
NO REQUIREMENTS 0
COMMENTS~U~~ ~tP"'6'J",
Mi>n{ be {2t5c::<...,KO /:!Js..Jo &.r~ Afp.
I
APPROVED 0 DltrJl;pD
DATE ro - 2..0 - C>\
SAN BERNARDINO WATER DEPT - ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
CENT&IL
CITY
LUTHERAN
MISSION
I ~<LS~i.:lU W L.::Il0
tru ~B 1 6 2001
rl)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
A NetgnDOrnood Development ProjectEmpoweri'1g People
ATTACHMENT "E"
'Brhg;JgThe ~
TIroughCreationOf
Commllity'
l354 North G Street San 8emaniJo, CA 93405 PIrone: 909..l8l-692.I Fax: 909,884 51D4 ..mal: cdn@.........iw.arm
Parking Spaces for the Proposed
Central City Lutheran Mission
Conditional Use Permit
1. There are special circumstances applicable to the property because oflocation and
surroundings that would advocate for a variance for the number of required parking
spaces from the strict application of this Development Code related to number of
parking spaces:
a. The location of the proposed building site - which is designed to be a
neighborhood service center operating at various times of the day - is in an area
of the City where only 35% to 40"10 of the residents possess cars.
b. The experience of our location in offering programs is that the majority of persons
seeking services walk to our site for services. On Friday and Saturday evenings,
for example, we have a Narcotics Anonymous meeting that regularly enjoys the
participation of 100 to 125 persons. Yet on a given night, there are probably no
more than 15 to 20 cars present. The majority of the persons walk.
c. On Sunday morning, there are probably 5 to 7 cars present during moming
worship hours, with attendance between 25-35. The majority of the persons walk.
d. On Tuesday morning, when we serve food to 48 local households, there are
probably no more than 10 to 15 vehicles present. The majority of the persons
walk.
e. On Christmas 'Eve, when we had 175 persons for worship, there were less than
20 cars in our parking lot. The majority of the persons walk.
2. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces is in keeping with the practice and
experience of similar service sites in our area.
a. Mary's Table, located on 641 Roberds Avenue in our neighborhood, serves 7,000
hot lunches between II :30 AM and 1 :30 PM, Monday through Friday, every
month. Their on-site parking spaces number less than 25. Once again, the
participants in the program are poor persons with no automobiles and walk for
services.
b. The Christian Center, located on "G" and 161h Street, also in our neighborhood, as
an After School Program and Teen Program that serves approximately the same
number of youth that we serve, about 80 per month. They have less than 10 on-
site parking spaces. Once again, given the age of the participants, all walk to the
site and parking is not a problem.
3. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces will not be materially detrimental to
the public health, safety or welcome in our neighborhood. Rather, the granting of this
variance enabling the speedy processing ofa conditional use permit will improve our
neighborhood residents' access to recreational facilities, educational facilities and
health care facilities. Parking as required for use of these facilities is more than
adequate with our existing parking lot and the proposed addition of 92 spaces,
meaning that cars will be parked on site and street side parking will not be required
during any program time.
4. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces does not constitute a special
privilege inconsistent with the practices and procedures of similar non-profit
organizations providing services in this neighborhood. As mentioned above, non-
profit religious organizations operating in our area have fewer parking spaces than
what we are proposing in our building plans, and in some cases, are serving more
persons that we are projecting to serve given the planned usage of our building
complex. Hence, the granting of this variance does not constitute any special
privilege but is cognizant of present neighborhood practices and needs.
S. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces does not allow unauthorized
activities from taking place at our site, which is seen as a site for the promotion of
education, health and safety in our neighborhood. The granting of the variance for
parking spaces is a part of a package Conditional Use Permit application which would
permit the functions on the property for which persons would be coming to the
facilities and therefore parking their cars. The educational building, health care
facility, recreational center and intern residency are being permitted through the
Conditional Use Permit, thereby assuring that parking by recipients of these services
are using the parking spaces for authorized purposes.
6. The granting of this Variance for parking spaces is not inconsistent with the General
Plan as outlined in our Conditional Use Permit application.
02113/01
ATTACHMENf "F"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
INITIAL STUDY FOR
Conditional Use Permit No. 00-11
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A request to construct four new buildings,
totaling 16,305 square feet on the premises of the Central City Lutheran Mission, which
is on 2.8 acres. Buildings will include a Multi-Purpose Facility, Classrooms, residences,
a clinic and 102 off-street shared parking spaces. The facilities and proposed uses are a
Multi-Purpose Facility for a recreation and community center (3,240 square feet) will
offer a meeting room for up to 250 persons, recreational activities during non-traditional
hours. A Communications Center with classrooms. An educational unit (4,028 square
feet) for the addition of four classrooms. A Residence/Office for Interns. The residence
facility (1,662 square feet) will house graduate students and interns. A Medical Clinic.
A Community Oriented Primary Care Facility (6,384 square feet) is designed to serve the
uninsured and the underinsured.
DATE: June 7,2001
PREPARED FOR
Central City Lutheran Mission
1354 N. 'G' Street
San Bernardino CA 92405
PREPARED BY
AEI-CASC Companies
937 South Via Lata, Suite 500
Colton CA 92507
REVIEWED BY
Environmental/Development Review
Committee on June 7, 200 1, pursuant to Section 21082
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
City of San Bernardino
Development Service Department
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
(909) 384-5057
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a
proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from
CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from
CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
must be prepared.
1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit 00-11, Central City Lutheran Mission
2. Lead Agency Name: City of San Bernardino
Address: 300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
3. Contact Person: Joe Bellandi
Phone Number: (909) 384-5057
4. Project Location (Address/Nearest cross-streets):
Southwest Comer ofG Street and Virginia Avenue (1354 North G Street)
5. Project Sponsor: Pastor David Kalke
Address: 1354 North G Street
San Bernardino, CA 92405
6. General Plan Designation: RM - Residential Medium & RU-2 - Residential Urban
7. Description of Project (Describe the whole action involved, including, but not limited to, later
phases of the project and any secondary, support, or off-site feature necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary):
A request to construct four new buildings, totaling 16,305 square feet on the premises of the
Central City Lutheran Mission, which is on 2.8 acres. Buildings will include a Multi-Purpose
Facility, Classrooms, residences, a clinic and 102 off-street shared parking spaces. The following
is a detailed description of the facilities (new buildings) proposed uses:
Multi-Purpose Facility: A recreational and cornmunity center (3,240 square feet) will offer a
meeting room for up to 250 persons, indoor basketball and showering facilities for participants.
The facility will be open for neighborhood cultural events, dinners and activities. The center will
be open Monday - Friday from 3:00 pm to 9:00 pm, Saturdays from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm and
Sundays from 2:00 pm - 6:00 pm, providing supervised recreational activities during non-
traditional hours for teens and pre-teens.
Communications Center (Classrooms): This educational unit (4,028 square feet) will serve two
functions. The first function will be the addition of four classrooms expanding the space available
for Central City Lutheran Mission's (CCLM) after school program. The second function will be a
state-of-the-art computer laboratory which will include an apprenticeship program for older teens
training them in desktop publishing, intemet skills, computer hardware and software and the use of
IS 1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
a web press. The educational unit will be open Monday - Friday 8:30 am to 6:00 pm. The
apprenticeship program will incorporate adolescents and young adults in a supervised training
program. The training program will involve six to ten students at a time, operating until 5:30 pm.
Additionally, the center will serve as a site for an after school program serving neighborhood youth
ages 5 - 12 from 3:30 pm to 6:00 pm. The estimated average attendance is 50 children in the
program.
Residence/Office for Interns: The residence facility (1,662 square feet) will house graduate
students and interns from schools of social work, public health and theology. Up to six students
will be housed for year-long internships while they work in the Mission's urban programs.
Facilities for shorter term clerical sabbaticals will also be available. Up to six adult graduate
students/interns will be housed for the CCLM's urban programs in this unit at a time. This area
will be their private residential facility while on staff with Central City Lutheran Mission. Each
staff person will be assigned a room, with kitchen, dining and living spaces being shared.
Medical Clinic: The Community Oriented Primary Care Facility (6,384 square feet) is designed to
serve the uninsured and the underinsured in the community (around CCLM). Owned by CCLM,
the clinic will be operated by a professional health care facility which will partner its efforts to
provide health care and health education. The facility will provide quality health care by trained
professionals and will be open Monday - Friday, 8:30 am to 6:00 pm. This primary care facility
will not house an intemal pharmacy (prescriptions will not be filled for the public; no narcotics nor
prescription-only medications will be housed on site; however, vaccines and medications used by
the primary care physicians in their day to day treatment of the community will be safely secured
in the facility) and will not be used for the dispensation of medications.
The proposed project has been designed to be a project in a community, for the community, with
the community. The majority of the participants in the CCLM programs are within walking
distance to the site.
8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
North: RU-2/Multi - Family Residential (apartments)
South: RU-2/Single Family Residential
East: RM/Multi - Family Residential(apartments)
West: RU-2 & IL/Single Family Residential & Light Industrial (West side of"H" street)
9. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, finance approval, or participation
agreement):
IS 2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
D Land Use and Planning
D Population and Housing
D Earth Resources
D Water
D Air Quality
DTransportation/Circulation
D Biological Resources
D Energy and Mineral Resources
D Hazards
D Noise
D Mandatory Findings of
Significance
D Public Services
D Utilities and Service Systems
D Aesthetics
D Cultural Resources
D Recreation
Determination.
On the basis of this Initial Study, the City of San Bernardino, Environmental Review Committee finds:
That the proposed project COULD NOT have significant effect on the environment, [8J
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
e- /J,d,- Jk
Ignatu
_'/'1/01
Date' I
Joe Bellandi
Printed Name
IS 3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imoact Incomorated Im"act No Imoact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Will the
orooosal result in:
a) A conflict with the land use as 0 0 [8J 0
designated based on the review of the
General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning
Districts Map?
b) Development within an Airport District 0 0 0 [8J
as identified in the Air Installation
Compatible Use Zone (AlCUZ) Report
and the Land Use Zoning District
Map?
c) Development within Foothill Fire 0 0 0 [8J
Zones A & B, or C as identified on the
Land Use Districts Zoning Map?
d) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Will the
proposal:
a) Remove existing housing (including 0 0 0 [8J
affordable housing) as verified by a
site survey/evaluation?
b) Create a significant demand for 0 0 0 [8J
additional housing based on the
proposed use and evaluation of project
size?
c) Induce substantial growth in an area 0 0 0 ~
either directly or indirectly (e.g.,
through projects in an undeveloped
area or an extension of major
infrastructure)?
d) Other? 0 0 0 IZI
IS 4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
ImDact Incoroorated Imnact No Imnact
III. EARTH RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a) Earth movement (cut and/or fill) on 0 0 0 [8J
slopes of 15% or more based on
information contained in the
Preliminary Project Description Form
No.D?
b) Development and/or grading on a slope 0 0 0 [8J
greater than 15% natural grade based
on review of General Plan HMOD
map?
c) Erosion, dust or unstable soil 0 0 0 [8J
conditions from excavation, grading or
fill?
d) Development within the Alquist-Priolo 0 0 0 [8J
Special Studies Zone as defined in
Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic,
Figure 47, of the City's General Plan?
e) Modification of any unique geologic or 0 0 0 [8J
physical feature based on field review?
f) Development within areas defined as 0 0 0 [8J
having high potential for water or wind
erosion as identified in Section 12.0,
Geologic & Seismic, Figure 53, of the
City's General Plan?
g) Modification of a channel, creek or 0 0 0 ~
river based on a field review or review
of USGS Topographic Map ?
h) Development within an area subject to 0 0 [8J 0
landslides, mudslides, subsidence or
other similar hazards as identified in
Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic,
Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the City's
General Plan?
IS 5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imoact Incomorated Imoact No Imoact
i) Development within an area subject to D 0 [8J D
liquefaction as shown in Section 12.0,
Geologic & Seismic, Figure 48, of the
City's General Plan?
j) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
IV. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage 0 0 [8J 0
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff due to impermeable
surfaces that cannot be mitigated by
Public Works Standard Requirements
to contain and convey runoff to
approved storm drain based on review
of the proposed site plan?
b) Significant alteration in the course or 0 0 0 [8J
flow of flood waters based on
consultation with Public Works staff?
c) Discharge into surface waters or any D 0 D [8J
alteration of surface water quality
based on requirements of Public Works
to have runoff directed to approved
storm drains?
d) Changes in the quantity or quality of 0 0 0 [8J
ground water?
e) Exposure of people or property to 0 0 0 ~
flood hazards as identified In the
Federal Emergency Management
Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map,
Community Panel Number ,
and Section 16.0, Flooding, Figure 62,
of the City's General Plan?
f) Other? 0 0 D [8J
IS 6
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imoact Incomorated Imoact No Imoact
V. AIR QUALITY. Will the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or 0 0 [8J 0
contribute to an existing or projected
air quality violation based on the
thresholds in the SCAQMD's "CEQA
Air Quality Handbook"?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to 0 0 [8J 0
pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or 0 0 0 [8J
temperature, or cause any change In
climate?
d) Create objectionable odors based on 0 0 0 [8J
information contained In the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form?
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. 0 0 0 [8J
Could the proposal result in:
a) A significant Increase in traffic 0 0 [8J 0
volumes on the roadways or
intersections or an increase that is
significantly greater than the land use
designated on the General Plan?
b) Alteration of present patterns of 0 0 0 [8J
circulation?
c) A disjointed pattern of roadway 0 0 0 [8J
improvements?
d) Impact to rail or air traffic? 0 0 0 [8J
e) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or 0 0 0 [8J
off-site based on the requirements in
Chapter 19.24 of the Development
Code?
f) Increased safety hazards to vehicles, 0 0 0 [8J
bicyclists or pedestrians?
IS 7
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incomorated Impact No Impact
g) Conflict with adopted policies 0 0 D [8J
supporting altemative transportation?
h) Inadequate emergency access or access 0 0 D I2SI
to nearby uses?
i) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Could the
proposal result in:
a) Development within the Biological 0 0 D [8J
Resources Management Overlay, as
identified In Section 10.0, Natural
Resources, Figure 41, of the City's
General Plan?
b) Impacts to endangered, threatened or 0 0 0 [8J
rare species or their habitat (including,
but not limited to, plants, mammals,
fish, insects and birds)?
c) Impacts to the wildlife dispersal or 0 0 D [8J
migration corridors?
d) Impacts to wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, 0 0 D [8J
riparian and vemal pool)?
e) Removal of viable, mature trees based 0 0 [8J 0
on information contained In the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form and verified by site
survey/evaluation (6" or greater trunk
diameter at 4' above the ground)?
f) Other? 0 0 D [8J
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL
RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy 0 0 D [8J
conservation plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources In a 0 0 D [8J
wasteful and inefficient manner?
IS 8
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact
c) Result in the loss of availability of a 0 0 0 [8J
known mineral resource that would be
of future value to the region and the
residents of the State?
IX. HAZARDS. Will the proposal:
a) Use, store, transport or dispose of 0 0 [8J 0
hazardous or toxic materials based on
information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form No. G(l) and G(2) (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b) Involve the release of hazardous 0 0 0 [8J
substances?
c) Expose people to the potential 0 0 D [8J
health/safety hazards?
d) Other? 0 0 D [8J
X. NOISE. Could the proposal result in:
a) Development of housing, health care 0 0 0 [8J
facilities, schools, libraries, religious
facilities or other noise sensitive uses
in areas where existing or future noise
levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A)
exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A)
interior as identified in Section 14.0,
Noise, Figures 57 and 58, of the City's
General Plan?
IS 9
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated ImDact No ImDact
b) Development of new or expansion of 0 0 0 [8J
existing industrial, commercial or other
uses which generate noise levels above
an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn
of 45 dB(A) interior that may affect
areas containing housing, schools,
health care facilities or other sensitive
uses based on information In the
Preliminary Environmental Description
Form No. G(J) and evaluation of
surrounding land uses No. C, and
verified by site survey/evaluation?
c) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal
have an effect upon, or result in a need for
new or altered government services in any
of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? D 0 [8J 0
b) Medical aid? 0 0 [8J 0
c) Police protection? 0 0 [8J 0
d) Schools? 0 0 0 [8J
e) Parks or other recreational facilities? 0 0 0 [8J
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 [8J 0
g) Maintenance of public facilities, D 0 [8J 0
including roads?
h) Other governmental services? 0 0 ~ 0
XII. UTILITIES. Will the proposal, based on
the responses of the responsible Agencies,
Departments, or Utility Company, impact
the following beyond the capability to
provide adequate levels of service or
require the construction of new facilities?
a) Natural gas? 0 0 ~ 0
IS 10
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incomorated Imoact No Imoact
b) Electricity? 0 0 [8J 0
c) Communications systems? 0 0 0 [8J
d) Water distribution? 0 0 [8J 0
e) Water treatment or sewer? 0 0 [8J 0
f) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 [8J
g) Result in a disjointed pattern of utility 0 0 0 [8J
extensions based on review of existing
patterns and proposed extensions?
h) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
XIII. AESTHETICS.
a) Could the proposal result In the 0 0 0 [8J
obstruction of any significant or
important scenic view based on
evaluation of the view shed verified by
site survey/evaluation?
b) Will the visual impact of the project 0 0 0 [8J
create aesthetically offensive changes
in the existing visual setting based on a
site survey and evaluation of the
proposed elevations?
c) Create significant light or glare that 0 0 0 [8J
could impact sensitive receptors?
d) Other? 0 0 0 [8J
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Could the
proposal result in:
a) Development in a sensitive 0 0 [8J 0
archaeological area as identified in
Section 3.0, Historical, Figure 8, of the
City's General Plan?
IS 11
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporated Imoact No Impact
b) The alteration or destruction of a D D D ~
prehistoric or historic archaeological
site by development within an
archaeological sensitive area as
identified in Section 3.0, Historical,
Figure 8, of the City's General Plan?
c) Alteration or destruction of a historical D D D ~
site, structure or object as listed in the
City's Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey?
d) Other? D D D ~
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood D D D ~
or regional parks or other recreational
facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational D D D ~
opportunities?
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to D D D ~
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to D D D ~
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
oflong-term, environmental goals?
IS 12
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Imoact Incoroorated Impact No Imoact
c) Does the project have impacts that are D D IZI D
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental D D D ~
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
IS 13
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
REFERENCES. The following references cited in the Initial Study are on file in the Development
Services Department.
1. City of San Bernardino General Plan.
2. City of San Bernardino Development Code (Title 19 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code).
3. City of San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey.
4. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones Map.
5. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
6. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
7. Public Works Standard Requirements-water.
8. Public Works Standard Requirements-grading.
DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIED CHECKLIST RESPONSES.
No items on the checklist require discussion.
IS 14
Page I of 7 Pages
Good morning Mayor Valles and members of City Council:
After meeting with all parties concerned on both September 8th as well as September 11th, our group
contends that our issues cannot be resolved in part by development of stipulations to a proposed Continuance
of Use Permit. We are representative ofa growing number of residents local to this project who believe that
it and its extension programs will create a phenomenal adverse impact on our neighborhood as well as the
welfare of its residents if it's currently proposed program is permitted to be implemented.
Title 14, California Code of Regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act, paragraph 15332. In-
Fill Development Projects, sub paragraph (d) specifically addresses traffic, noise, air quality, and water
quality as necessary considerations in approving in fill projects. Under those provisions we contend that:
· This project would cause an excessive increase in hazardous emissions of vehicle exhaust fumes, which
would have an adverse impact on the children attending a school within one-quarter rnile of its proposed
location,
· This project would contribute to additional sources of polluted runoff water, with the expansion of'"the
project's asphalt parking lot as well as excessively employed curbside parking, which would cause an
even greater demand on already inadequately performing local storm water drainage systems.
· This project would create a substantial periodic increase in ambient noise levels, noise levels in excess of
the noise ordinance as well as excessive ground-borne noise levels produced by randomly blasting
vehicle horns, discharging vehicle alarm systems, playing excessively loud vehicle sound systems, and
exhibiting altered vehicle muffler systems in a focal point geographical area Also an existing echoing
effect produced by surrounding structures would enhance noise produced by use of the amplification
sound system to be used in the proposed outdoor amphitheater regardless of its compliance with
established ordinance disciple levels.
· This project would cause an increase in immediate area traffic, which would be substantial in relationship
to the existing traffic load, as well as add to already heavy congestion in key intersections. The 2000
Census Report identifies the population of the three key ZIP Code areas that this project proposes to
support as being a total of 55,747 people. Using what we believe to be a below average projection of
30% of that total population to establish a formula of use for this project, along with the established
demographic standard of 5 persons per household ratio and a demographic given of 1 vehicle per
household, we arrived at a total of 3,345 vehicles becoming subject to be added to our immediate
neighborhood. This number is contended to be present on a regular basis and the variable is anywhere
from a once weekly to once monthly occurrence. Presently we are impacted by excessive vehicular
. accident risks twice daily, year round as a result of parents double parking, blocking intersections, and
not being attentive to moving traffic when arriving or leaving to drop off and pick up their children at the
4f-;;:::
lo-/-of
Page 2 of 7 Pages
nearby elementary school. Also the increased traffic load would excel the current breakdown of G
Street's surface, which is already in drastic need of major repair services.
· This project would result in inadequate parking capacity in both the project's provided spaces as well as
surrounding area curbside spaces, depending on the time of day, the time of the month and/or the amount
of time required to receive satisfactory services. This could result in local residents having their private
driveways repeatedly blocked, loss of curbside parking space for family and guests, as well as increase
the amount of litter already being deposited on nearby properties as a result of loitering.
Additional provisions of Title 14, California Code of Regulations of the California Environmental Quality
Act also allows for considerations in that:
· This project would substantially degrade the existing visual character of the surrounding area as well as
physically divide an established community by the fact that a full time business would be made
operational in the midst of an established core residential area I apologize for not being able to site the
specific reference but in support of this a recent amendment to County Plans cites that the Board of
Supervisors strongly discourages promoting what they refer to as checker boarding, which is explained as
building new commercial buildings in the midst of established residential areas and vise versa.
· This project would cause a substantial adver!le change in at least one potential historical resource in that
Mrs. Hargrave-Gates has received information that her home very possibly has historical significance.
Time has not allowed promoting a review by the National Historical Society as of yet. However, placing
a permanent elevated fence with added safety net on top of that along the entire post abutting area to
permanently protect her property from physical use impact from this project's participants, as has been
suggested doing, would definitely create a major flaw in the property's appearance as well as add to an
un-programmed future maintenance expense.
· This project would result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new
governmental facilities in the form of social services and health care, of which their construction could
cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, as well as allow
for timely response of emergency medical services and/or enhanced police presence which would be
expected performance objectives related to this project's category of services.
· This project would cause the proposed recreational facility to exhibit an adverse physical effect on the
environment in that assurance can't be provided that participants using it would be properly supervised
so as to not lend to them either intentionally or unintentionally causing damage to any immediate
surrounding residents' properties. Also lacks of prevention of excessive noise from competitive sports
. engagement and resulting damage to surrounding properties from possible physical conflicts are
concerns.
Page 3 of 7 Pages
· This project would result in producing environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings both directly and indirectly in that this project's continued public promotions equal to
"a safe place where troubled children from low income families can come to work, play and learn"
implies that its location is in an economically depressed neighborhood. According to the 2000 Census
Report the 92405 ZIP Code area has a 19"10 higher median household income than 92411 and 41 % higher
than 92401. It has a 27% higher average home.value than 92411 and 26% higher than 92401. It has a
21% higher average rent than 92411 and 17% higher than 92401. This project's persistence in
continuing to use a false ploy to draw a targeted audience to its services is casting a negative social
stigma on the residents and their properties in my neighborhood that we believe that we don't deserve. In
the previous 8 months three residents on G Street who are within 100 feet of this project have suffered
graffiti on their property for the first time in over a l7-year period. Several other property owners on
Virginia who are also within 100 feet of this project have also been impacted by graffiti within the
previous year and for the first time. The project's using this propaganda to promote a cause is pulling an
element into our neighborhood that they are refusing to accept responsibility for causing to be there.
Promoting increasing the quantity of that element even on a temporary occupancy basis is not only going
to escalate the potential of danger to residen'ts and damage to property but it also is going to negate any
future success of the environmental health of the entire community.
Some unresolved confusion has risen as to if this project's CUP is inclusive of current and proposed multiple
shelters. Since the shelter that is identified as St Martin's House has been heavily promoted through various
media sources as one of the project's viable programs we were of the contention that all of the future shelters
should also be a part of the proposed CUP in that they would be a direct support element to both the social
services and health care provisions.
o in reviewing the public records for these properties we have discovered that they are deeded solly
to one individual, an . out mention of them being a part of the corporation of the project.
caused additional concerns in that the 1 . 'dual who is }le!formin ces as well as
paid a salary from the Mis' s funds has been 0 novating one or more of these private properties.
of misappropriation of taxpayer-based funds. . ce monies distributed to faith-
based ini' ves are proposed to be limited to taxpayer based federal grants, we have a co
mo . s may be used to pay for property taxes, property insurance, and mortgage payments for a p .
operty holder.
In addition to the confusion generated in their regulation of existence, there is also a commensurate amount
of concern as to their propriety of intended use. These properties that are scattered throughout the immediate
neighborhood have already been designated as temporary shelters, exclusively for HIV+ homeless persons.
Page 4 of 7 Pages
Dedication to programs to support decreasing the numbers of homeless individuals seems to be one priority
that a faith based iuitiative would target. However, even in light of the fact that the provisions of the Fair
Housing Act automatically exempts all shelter operators from falling subject to charges of practicing
discrimination in any form, we fmd this elected choice of action highly immoral in content. We also contend
that this project was not properly thought out so as to ensure the best interest for its program participants or
the residents in the neighborhood.
The National Resource Center on Homelessness and Mental Illness states that, "20 - 25% of homeless
individuals have a serious mental illness". They also add "There are up to 200,000 people with serious
mental illness living on the streets or in shelters". The American Civil Liberties Union reports that the
factors that heighten the risk of HIV infection among the homeless frequently occurs in combination with
substance abuse, unsafe sexual behavior, and/or chronic mental illness. Certainly it can be considered that
persons having one or more of these classes of serious mental illness could become a candidate for housing
in one or more of these shelters. We contend that these proposed shelters are not capable of providing the
security elements necessary to protect the safety of their occupants or residents of the neighborhood. Too,
we have serious concerns that incidents directly related to serious mental illness episodes could become a
common occurrence in and around the expansion"project.
The American Civil Liberties Union has promoted enactment of federal laws to protect the privacy of all
HIV stricken persons. They stand firm on the fact of proof that public disclosure of persons having H1V is a
breech of civil rights and a detriment to the welfare of the persons stricken because of the social stigma that
the general public associates with the disease. We contend that the Mission has shown no consideration for
the rights or welfare of these people by the fact that wide spread self-generated as well as public media
sources have been repeatedly used to identify a specific location where these people are being sheltered.
This in turn has created concerns for local residents with respect to the proposed shelters in that we contend
that continued public promotions of these shelters could subject us to indirect and unprotected physical harm
or subject our properties to damage in the event that social stigma related retaliatory actions were brought
against these shelters' occupants. Also general knowledge of the location of these shelters could result in
wide spread neighborhood property values decreasing drastically because of evident social stigmas giving it
an undesirable reflection as well as the high level of quick turnover ratio of their occupants, which depicts an
unstable neighborhood.
In consideration of the Mission's current and proposed future contributions to the community we have
adopted established variables of what a community should provide in order to be considered healthy. Those
being:
· Housing that is safe and affordable
Page 5 of? Pages
· A diverse economy with jobs that offer a living wage
. Health care services for all stages of the life cycle and quality medical care
· Excellent education opportunities, responsible child-care, accessible public transportation and
recreational facilities
· Respect for natural resources and the community's historical and cultural roots
· Public processes that give all residents a voice in decisions affecting their community
· Active engagement among people of all races, cultures and religions
In conclusion to all considerations we are in full agreement that after five years of establishment that the
Mission has failed to satisfactorily contribute to any of the variables that constitute a healthy community. In
that the Mission has not evidenced good faith acts on our behalf, we are also in full agreement that if the
Mission is permitted to continue with its presently established proposed plan that not only will the health of
the commuuity remain in jeopardy but also eventual serious detriment to the very survival of the commuuity
will manifest.
However, in looking at all of the parts of the equation it appears to me that the Mission has been made a
victim of a political system that has forced it to come to believe that it must forfeit even its morals in order to
survive.
"
As President Bush concluded that private and charitable community groups, including religious ones, should
have the fullest opportunity to compete on a level playing field with government agencies, he implemented
the Executive Order: Establishment of White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, which
was birthed on January 29, 2001. Within the established policy it states that the paramount goal of these
private and charitable community groups will be to achieve compassionate results. However, after spending
innumerable hours stumbling through tons of minutia, while attempting to logically decipher the expected
role of faith based charitable organizations in relationship to achieving compassionate results, I made a very
startling discovery.
Although the Executive Order's policy promotes faith-based initiatives competing on a level playing field no
new money has been made available for this initiative at the federal level. As a result, funding for faith-
based initiatives can only be made available by taking dollars away from agencies already involved in social
services. So in effect, faith based initiatives are being forced into a form of prostitution in order to meet the
Executive Order's directive to deliver results oriented social services by achieving valid public purposes,
such as curbing crime, conquering addiction, strengthening families and neighborhoods, and overcoming
poverty in order to be permitted to continue to survive.
I am left with little doubt that the motivation behind this legislative action was not to help religious
organizations care for the poor but to help the state get its hands on federal funds. It is perfectly clear to me
Page 6 of 7 Pages
that what has taken place within the concept of this project's proposed plan of expansion is exactly that.
Maybe that also explains why the Mission's School District Funded Community Based Homework Center
does not evidence its participants going into or away from the program carrying any pens, pencils, paper,
books, or backpacks, yet Riley Elementary School's recent test scores show their students came in 24%
below the County and 30% below the State in basic reading skills as well as 13% below the County and 18%
below the State in basic math skills.
My conclusions give me all the more reason to continue to oppose this project's expansion, as it is evident
that the events of September 11th, coupled with the proposed long term federal actions to appease that event's
tragedy will leave taxpayers' dollars in a rarer state of continued availability for many federal programs that
are currently taken for granted. It also will definitely leave the new faith-based kids on the federal block
hoping for luck to have any opportunity remaining for them to be considered to even receive handouts.
Central City Lutheran Mission's choice to play the game of providing social services by using government
funds has already created a great expense for them. Their electing to participate on that level playing field
establishes unbendable laws that force them:
· To incorporate separately from their sponsoring religious institution
· To refrain from religious activities as wlill as inducing others to convert to their faith during a
government-funded program
· To provide an environment that is free from religious symbols and doctrine where they operate their
social service.
I have serious concerns about those rules. We have allowed the government to strip God out of our schools,
our organized athletics, all other public events, and now they have duped us into promoting that he be ripped
out of faith-based charitable organization, were he is the very heart of the meaning of faith. I can't find the
level playing field in that thinking and I would challenge anyone else to be able to do so also.
It seems reasonable at this point that the Mission needs to think about how much farther they are willing to
go and how much more they have left remaining to forfeit to satisfy the government at the continued risk of
the welfare of the people. There are established and successful programs out there that don't permit
government programs to rnilk faith-based charitable initiatives of their right to participate on what remains of
a playing field.
Rev. Eugene Rivers in Boston is leading the best of the 8 nationally recognized faith-based institutions. His
adopted Ten Point Coalition has produced the top rated street outreach program currently in national
existence. He has used community leaders, volunteer groups, law enforcement officials, and members of the
juvenile justice system as the players to ensure winning that success and recognition.
Page 7 of 7 Pages
I believe that it is time for Central City Lutheran Mission to rethink their game plan, gather strategic players
who will volunteer for heart and not greed for money, and go for the touchdown for their own team's glory
and not for the opponents.
I am fully convinced that this Mission deserves the right to claim their playing field on their own merit and I
believe that they have the capability of doing just that. We the people of San Bernardino deserve to have
something that will give us the opportunity to win positive national recognition. Putting up a $2M site that is
going to have its health care staffed by student nurses, it social services staffed by Interns, and its computer
training school void of a credentialed instructors is going to earn us a reputation alright, but it won't be a
good one.
The plan that the project currently has proposed will escalate crime which will give our police officers job
security that they don't need, use persons addicted to dmgs as a test base for professional students of health
care and social services to study, destroy a neighborhood that is already evidencing fractures from early
exposure to it, and endorse poverty by continuing to promote its people remaining dependent instead of
supporting their becorning independent.
In closing, the only advise I have for Central City Lutheran Mission is to forget about religion, forget about
the government but don't continue to forsake. the people who need your help, and don't forget that
everything that is good is possible when God is on your side.
Thank you all for your time and interest to this matter. I am more than willing to provide requested copies of
this transcript to anyone who feels that it would be beneficial for future reference.
c~./. ~
Section 2725.3 of the Business and Professions Code and Section 1276.4 of the Health and Safety Code
(Licensing Requirements for Treating Nurses). General acute care hospitals, acute care psychiatric hospitals,
and special hospitals (health facilities with governing bodies and which provide inpatient or outpatient medical
or dental treatment) are prohibited from assigning unlicensed persons, instead of registered nurses, to perform
nursing functions or from allowing unlicensed personnel, even under the direct supervision of a registered nurse,
to perform acts that require substantial technical or scientific skills, including but not limited to:
(I) administration of medication;
(2) venipuncture or intravenous therapy;
(3) parenteral or tube feedings;
(4) invasive procedures;
(5) assessment of patient condition;
(6) education of patient and family regarding the patient's condition; and
(7) moderately complex laboratory tests.
It also requires the Department of Health Services to adopt regnlations establishing the minimum, specific, and
numerical licensed nurse-to-patient ratios in licensed general acute care hospitals, acute care psychiatric
hospitals or skilled nursing facilities by January 1.2001.
Attachment 2 to ENCLOSURE I to Reference: Continuance of Use Permit for Central City Lutheran Mission
(CCLM)
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 107, Supplement 3, June 1999 states that
Pesticides and Inner-City Children: Exposures, Risks, and Prevention
Philip J. Landrigan, 1,2 Luz Claudio, 1.2 Steven B. Markowitz, , Gertrud S. Berkowitz, 1,2 Barbara L. Brenner, 1 Harry
Romero, ' James G. Wetmur,3 Thomas D. Matte, 6 Andrea C. Gore, 4 James H. Godbold, , and Mary S. Wolff'. 2
'Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, 2Center for Children's Health and the Environment, 'Department
of Microbiology, 'Fishberg Center for Neurobiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York USA;
4Borikuen Neighborhood Health Center, New York, New York USA; 6Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies of the
New York Academy of Medicine, New York, New York USA; 3Center for Biology of Natural Systems, Queens
College, City University of New York, New York, New York USA
Ahstract
Six million children live in poverty in America's inner cities. These children are at high risk of exposure to pesticides
that are used extensively in urban schools, homes, and day-care centers for control of roaches, rats, and other vermin.
The organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos and certain pyrethroids are the registered pesticides most heavily applied
in cities. Illegal street pesticides are also in use, including Ires pasitos (a carbamate), tiza china, and methyl parathion.
In New York State in 1997, the heaviest use of pesticides in all counties statewide was in the urban boroughs of
Manhattan and Brooklyn. Children are highly vulnerable to pesticides. Because of their play close to the ground, their
hand-to-mouth behavior, and their unique dietary patterns, children absorb more pesticides from their environment
than adults. The long persistence of semivolatile pesticides such as chlorpyrifos on rugs, furniture, stuffed toys, and
other absorbent surfaces within closed apartments further enhances urban children's exposures. Compounding these
risks of heavy exposures are children's decreased ability to detoxify and excrete pesticides and the rapid growth,
development, and differentiation of their vital organ !$ystems. These developmental immaturities create early windows
of great vulnerability. Recent experimental data suggest, for example, that chlorpyrifos may be a developmental
neurotoxicant and that exposure in utero may cause biochemical and functional aberrations in fetal neurons as well as
deficits in the number of neurons. Certain pyrethroids exert hormonal activity that may alter early neurologic and
reproductive development. Assays currently used for assessment of the toxicity of pesticides are insensitive and cannot
accurately predict effects to children exposed in utero or in early postnatal life. Protection of American children, and
particularly of inner~ity children, against the developmental hazards of pesticides requires a comprehensive strategy
that monitors patterns of pesticide use on a continuing basis, assesses children's actual exposures to pesticides, uses
state-of-the-art developmental toxicity testing, and establishes societal targets for reduction of pesticide use.
Key words: children's environmental health, chlorpyrifos, environmental justice, neurodevelopmental impairment,
organophosphates, pesticides, and pyrethroids. - Environ Health Perspect 107(suppI3): 431-437 (1999).
Attachment 1 to ENCLOSURE I to Reference: Continuance of Use Permit for Central City Lutheran Mission
(CCLM)
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 97, No.6 - June 1996 states that:
There has been recent news from the National Institutes of Health that cockroaches are a leading cause of asthma
among urban children.
It has been known for many years that cockroaches cause allergies, food poisoning, diarrhea, salmonella,
gastroenteritis and other infections. This latest finding confirms that cockroaches pose a very serious health hazard and
urban residents should take appropriate action to control America's No. I household pest. Now is the time to act
because cockroach activity escalates early in the summer, peaking in July and August.
The National Cooperative Inner City Asthma Study, a five-year, $17 million study sponsored by the National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has concluded that cockroaches are the leading cause of asthma among children in
seven U. S. cities according to an Associated Press story. The study found that cockroach "antigens" are the most
powerful of all possible asthma-provoking materials that children encounter in inner-city homes. An antigen is a
substance that causes children to wheeze - the most common symptom of asthma.
In 1991, a team of researchers set out to identify the antigens in low-income children's asthma. They expected to find
that dust mites and cats are the culprits because they are the leading causes of asthma in suburban areas. But after
testing, 1,528 children under age 10 and visiting half of their homes, the researchers discovered that the leading
antigen comes from droppings and carcasses produced by German cockroaches.
Asthma: Growing Problem
While asthma is a serious problem in urban areas, it is the most common chronic illness of childhood and appears to be
increasing everywhere, even though outdoor and indoor air-quality levels have improved. The proportion of Americans
who say they have asthma has risen 45 percent in the past decade. Some 12 million Americans - a third of them under
age 18 - suffer from asthma.
~~I'-1F: ~'~
..0 pocod M /1/11(> J
- :>.<Jrj:-; '\!1t~r _
HE-irn
3S
~:~;:.;,,,o1.;y ~
,t'i~':Jl :';;jH d,;:iHc(!:mlO
,".n"''' .
SPEAKERS' REQUEST TO ADDRESS
MAYOR & COMMON COUNCIL
REGARDING ITEM ON AGENDA
~'~ (!<4M-~ C;.f..r btt..'f!1VI1t Mssio,
Agenda Item No. 55
Date ID~/-t)(.
I ,AI
Name . lYIM-'fM- ~E- W&s
Address 7~7 ~d:eU/~ $
Sfht ~/io . GJt(
./
"%;t~~
SUPPORT APPROVAL OF ITEM
SUPPORT DENIAL OF ITEM ~
SPEAKERS' REQUEST TO ADDRESS
MAYOR & COMMON COUNCIL
REGARDING ITEM ON AGENDA
Agenda Item No. ~ 35
Date / (),J($)/UA ) r-JOO/
..... 6f,..'P-" S. C".-~
Address /_~ y~ ~ .aA:.:tk ~r-
~1f~tU~o
SUPPORT APPROVAL OF ITEM
SUPPORT DENIAL OF ITEM V'
Speaker's Request To Addressv.
Mayor and Common Council I
Regarding Item on Agenda
.~~
Date
Name
Support ADDroval of Item
Support Denial of Item
CNQ..2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No.
"?5
Om. 3Jl ~
Name ' )<< ~//bJ
Address 7 ~f3 {J .()/ry "'1~; ~ 51
>~>~~ ~:<-C/cJ~
Support Denial of Item
7
Support ADDroval of Item
CNCl.2.01
~/r5/~, WoUld
k~ 7/ 0 ~ A511~
SPEAKERS' REQUEST TO ADDRESS
MAYOR & COMMON COUNCIL
REGARDING ITEM ON AGENDA
v
Agenda Item No. 3.5
Due \
Name ?1t WfL -nJ U/ui /~
Address 57 J t.J. {c{ K'T-
~ ~nD-'1~
,
(! k, 9;!J. 6t::;_
SUPPORT APPROVAL OF ITEM d
SUPPORT DENIAL OF ITEM
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
/
Agenda Item No. 4t: J ;;;
Date , (j! I ( 0 I
Name -K -(> <I I ( ..pA/1 c:; e-t/~ V'~
Address "3 ~ 5 7 5"" VeiCW" do iL2.k:--
VIA t"Ct ~/?~ C pj C12-~qq
Support Aooroval of Item---4-
Support Denial of Item
CNCL-2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No. + -s S-
Date JDIt /0/
Name ErvJ,n IJ . 13U$t'__h;oer
Address ,JQ,06 Po-h-li C)'" R).
,Yu ca/;~( CA q~3f 7
Support Aooroval of Item
Support Denial of Item
CNCL-2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
. Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No.
:55
Date 101 I I()/
Name rdWIVI \.~ofnM c5dV"\
Address \36(; [; n CYt-ree+
~t 3 ~ ~1V}t1 CA-
q'2-~Ov/
Support ADDroval of Item
~.
Support Denial of Item
CNCl-2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No. '35
Date /0 II / () )
Name {7fz1Jab fI}..J U~
Address ~~ )t'..k'f7f<'1 u-J
Ytl..CAif~ ~ q't.?/7
Support ADDroval of Item )(
Support Denial of Item
CNCl.2.0l
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No.
Date /ey{,I/~ /
NamgZ~, J /~ . jJ-e~ ~
.0 "5.-7 7
Address I ~J ,'x .;:2-;/
;:J;"v/Y/,'P/ I L# 9~:2':<-<S
/
15
Support ADDroval of Item
~
Support Denial of Item
CNCl.2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No.
~5
Date (Jell. ;z. c> (? I
Name Oc, I? ...:(.;~ . 5~ LA. C. I e;r~
(J
Address ~c>1c> 'Bt...yrr/z;::.- 4t1~
H/6#"./...A-/IIP.C~ ~2*
,
Support ADDroval of Item
Support Denial of Item
CNCl-2.01
~.~-~...~~.,., ",. ".~'-'""._--.....,~,_.,~.~.,-~ . .
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
d5 _
Agenda Item No. CtL JV1 &(f~
Date fIJI'IO(
Name J) D ro--thAf ~/Yl-;l;~VI/Ci.rc(p!\D
J / c, - 7.. twO
Address 7 1'::J I II t1to Pus", ~
S~ /bcrMl=c!A /to ; (~ ~7 l '!Dc.j
f..!1Q,Sb.-k U~I" ,CV.fl,!yr(V"rt~i)
:Deff JO 1k.JfJl i('llJu.s;^'i~
Support Aooroval of Item V---
Support Denial of Item
CNCl-2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No.
I
15
Support ADDroval of Item
Support Denial of Item
CNCl-2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No. '3 ~
Date It))~ _ -+
Name D '1'R..k~ 'f:" (hN ~a^J
Address 3(;, ~ W\51Nl.\..oe-IL b~
""'::> . ~ , Cf 246 ~
Support ADDroval of Itemp
Support Denial of Item
CNCL-2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No. 3.5
Date ()c..+, I/:L Do I
Name <?~ ~ u..c...~ ~~ ~ I
(:I
Address /3 ~~ N. c:, :St-,
5 D..N-\ 6~ n u....r ~ 1') , C.-A-
o
'1 'J...-'-+o 5
Support ADDroval of Item
/
Support Denial of Item
CNCL-2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No. 3--5
Date () C7\ . d \ . 2 do \
Name ~M\\J~ N\::UJC\AeV\.
Address Cl,2(J \\l '.?C\ -\"IA -cr.
Support Aooroval of Item ~
Support Denial of Item
CNCl-2.01
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
Agenda Item No. S5
:::e ~;~ j~-E-O (~
T:.... ( I
(fi,
Address ./ ~5 S 7' AI
r .-
r;
cT
Support ADDroval of Item
~
Support Denial of Item
CNCl.2.01
SPEAKERS' REQUEST TO ADDRESS
MAYOR & COMMON COUNCIL
REGARDING ITEM ON AGENDA
Agenda Item No. Q5
Date If) - 0/-0 J.
Name ho;/k,mJI?Cl J...{)/J f z.,.
Address ~ Jj/ rJ. ;/"sl- ~J.8
OCU7 f.JJ e.rr'Jm,dlJc) cPc;
1 ;;1.111 {}
SUPPORT APPROVAL OF ITEM
SUPPORT DENIAL OF ITEM .
,
Speaker's Request To Address
Mayor and Common Council
Regarding Item on Agenda
.
Date
,:).c)
Name
Address
Support ApDroval of Item
Support Denial of Item
CNa.-2.o1