HomeMy WebLinkAboutR09-Public Works
,......,
--
r'
\,."...
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
..
'...
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION/COUNCIL ACTION
From:
Roger G. Hardgrave, Dir. Subject:
of Public Works/City Engr.
Renovation - Savings
& Loan Buildings for
Police Station --
701 N. "E" Street
Date:
9-15-92
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Synopsis of Previous Commission/Council/Committee Action:
04-09-92
Oral report on results of Police Department Space
Study presented to RDA Committee.
Resolution No. 5333 adopted authorizing the execu-
tion of an Agreement for Professional Services with
Leach Mounce Architects.
06-15-92
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended Motion:
1, That the original direction to renovate the two savings and
loan buildings, at 701 North "E" Street, for use as a Central
Police Station, be affirmed.
OR
,
\""
2. That the Design Development Team be directed to proceed with
renovation of Building A and construction of a new wing (with
an area of approximately 31,612 sq. ft.) to the savings and
loan building at the northeast corner of "E" Street and 7th
Street, for use as a Central Police Stat'
Ro . Hardgrav ,
cc: ~
S. Clark
------------------~~_:~~~:~:_~::~~~-~:~-~~:~::_~~~~~:::~:~:_---
Contact Person: Roqer G. Hardqrave Phone: 5025
Project Area:
Central City North
Ward(s):
1
Supporting Data Attached:
Staff Report
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: $
N/A
Source:
Budget Authority:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Commission/Council Notes:
(;"
;,
Agenda Item No.: q
,''''....,
..-
..
\...........
'.....".
Page 1 of 2
<""
{... '
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
STAFF REPORT
Renovation of Savings & Loan Buildings
at 701 North wEw Street
for Police Station
The Architect for renovation of the savings and loan buildings,
at 701 North "E" Street, has been meeting regularly with the
Design Development Team, At the meeting of 9-9-92, the Archi-
tect passed out a schematic cost estimate,
Five (5) alternates were presented in this schematic estimate,
ranging from $2,106,104 to $6,586,171. The lowest priced
alternate, designated A, includes the renovation of the office
spaces and restrooms. No cost is included in this alternate for
structural upgrading to meet current earthquake criteria.
Alternate B is in the amount of $3,629,309, and includes the
renovation in the first alternate, plus $1,523,205 for structural
upgrade.
Addition of 3,748 square feet to the lobby and mezzanine floors
" in Building A, electrical and mechanical upgrades, addition of
","", two elevators and site work is included in the estimate of
$5,008,369 for Alternate C.
Alternate D is the same as Alternate C, except that a 8,083
square foot addition is included to bring the total available
space up to the programmed value. The estimated cost of this
alternate is $5,816,669.
The Architect reviewed the site to determine the potential for
future expansion. A footprint for a 13,000 square foot addition
to Building A was developed. This footprint would accommodate a
3 or 4 story building to be constructed, and fits in well with
the site conditions and Building A.
Due to the cost associated with renovating Building B, the Archi-
tect developed Alternate E as a comparison of the cost of this
renovation with construction of the new addition to Building A.
The cost for Alternate E is $6,586,171, which is $1,577,802
higher than Alternate C, and $769,502 higher than Alternate D.
Building B also presents some operational problems for the Police
Department, due to it being separated from Building A.
("'"
,.,.'
q
1____ 1__",.
.~'-
~
\_'
..
'''"''''
.
...
(o..
Page 2 of 2
The Structural Engineer for this project located a set of prints
and soil tests for the original building in the files of the
Structural Engineer for that project. Finding these prints and
tests will eliminate the need for most, if not all, of the
$28,000 in extra work discussed at the last meeting of your
Committee. A bill in the approximate amount of $1,600 will be
submitted for reproduction costs.
An amount of $1,523,205 is included in these alternates (except
for the first one) for structural upgrade, to meet current earth-
quake requirements, This amount is very preliminary, and will
probably change significantly. Any change in the cost for
structural upgrading for Building B will affect the difference in
cost, between renovation and construction of an addition to
Building A. The Structural Engineer indicated that more, precise
estimates will be available for the next meeting with the Design
Development Team on 9-30-92.
It should be emphasized that the schematic cost estimates are a
first draft, and are subject to extensive revision.
The Design Development Team would appreciate an affirmation to
[f'''' proceed with preparation of plans for renovation of Buildings A
'"" and B, or for renovation of Building A and construction of a new
addition,
r
\.,"
9-15-92
q