HomeMy WebLinkAbout48-Planning
'CI'O OF SAN BERNARDr '0 - REQUF""T FOR COUNCIL AC)ON
....,.,4 ..-
From:
R. Ann Siracusa
Director of Planning
Subject:
Change of Zone No. 87-19 ~~
Dept:
Planning
Mayor and Council Meeting of
September 21, 1987, 2:00 p.m.
Date:
september 21, 1987
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Previous planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on September 8, 1987, the
following action was taken:
The Planning Commission recommended adoption of the Negative
Declaration for environmental impact and approval of Change of Zone
No. 87-19.
Vote: 6-0, 1 abstention, 1 absent.
Recommended motion:
To approve the responses to comments and to adopt the Negative
Declaration for environmental impact which has been reviewed and
considered, and
To approve, modify or reject the findings and the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and direct the City Attorney to pre-
pare the necessary amendments to the zoning Code.
( I,
.. !I
~ / i J
\--' i \ ,. I' '
. Iv \I'-1\A}j )/\ yr.--
Signature R. Ann Siracusa
Contact person:
R. Ann siracusa
Phone:
184-51'>7
6
Supporting data attached:
Staff Report
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
,.".n.,,,,,
Agenda Item No.4?'
c ;''''' "
'-' "'
--' -)
r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT""
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
it4
OJ//j//j/
6
~
lo.c
CHANGE OF ZONE 87-19
APPLICANT: Redevelopment Agency
of the City of S.B.
300 North D Street
OWNER: San Bernardino, CA 92418
(same)
l&J
~
o
Applicant requests approval to change the zone from "T"
Transitional, and R-1-72QO! Single Family Residential, to a
C-3A Limited General Commercial Zone.
~
l&J
:)
o
III
a:
.....
4
IIJ
a:
4
Subject property is approximately 10.0 acres in size and located
generally at the northeast corner of Baseline Street and Medical
Center Drive.
~
PROPERTY
Subject
North
East
South
West
EXISTING
LAND USE
ZONING
"T"R-1-7200
R-l-72QO
C-3A,T,R-1-7200
C-3A
C-3A,T,R-1-7200
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION
Vacant, S.F Resid.
S.F. Residential
Vacant, SF Resid.
Vacant, Commercial
Retail, School
General Commercial
S.F. Res.4-7 du/ac
S.F. Res.4-7 du/ac
MF Resid.1S-24du/ac
MF Resid. Public
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC }!]I YES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A C JQg YES )
HAZARD ZONE ONO ZONE oNO OZONE B SEWERS 0 NO
HIGH FIRE DYES AIRPORT NOISE / DYES REDEVELOPMENT ~YES
HAZARD ZONE DiNO CRASH ZONE UNo PROJECT AREA ONO
..J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z a APPROVAL
~ APPLICABLE E FFE CTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - 0
ZCl) MEASURES NO E.I.R. Ii CONDITIONS
I&I(!) o EXEMPT o E.I.R, REQUIRED BUT NO 11.0 0
::Ez II.Ci DENIAL
z- SIGN IFICANT EFFECTS
00 ~::E
a:Z WITH MITIGATING 0 CONTINUANCE TO
MEASURES CI)::E
:;:ii: 0
z UNO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 0
l&J SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E,R. C, 1&1
EFFECTS MINUTES It:
~~~. ".. RlVISEO JULY ,n.
ceo ~
"'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CAS~ COZ 87-19
OBSERVATIONS
91~/87
2
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
r
1 . REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval to change the
zoning from "T" Transitional and R-1-7200 (Single Family
Residential) to C-3A (Limited General Commercial) on a
10.0 acre parcel located generally at the northeast
corner of Baseline Street and Medical Center Drive
(Exhibit "A").
2. BACKGROUND
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino,
the applicant, has purchased the subject property for
the purposes of land assembly for the eventual develop-
ment of the site into a large shopping center.
3. EXISTING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN
The subject property consists of rear portions of
properties fronting on the north side of Baseline Street
commencing approximately 185 feet east of the northeast
corner of Baseline Street and Medical Center Drive. The
frontage along Baseline Street comprises approximately
1000 feet. (See Exhibit "B").
The existing zoning of the property in question consists
of 100 foot deep "T", Transitional Zone in the southern-
most portion. The remainder portion of the property to
the north is zoned R-1-7200, Single Family Residential.
The General Plan Land Use Designation for the property
is General Commercial. Said designation was established
under General Plan Amendment 82-2 adopted June 21, 1982,
(See Exhibit "C").
The proposed zone change to C-3A (Limited General
Commercial) is consistent with the General Plan Land Use
Designation of General Commercial.
4.
SURROUNDING LA~ USEL ZON~~G AND GENERAL PLAN
~,
To the north of the subject property is a Single Family
Residential neighborhood with R-1-7200 zoning and a
General Plan Designation of medium-low density residen-
tial 4-7 du/ac. (See Exhibit "C".)
c
1"'",.
'-'
o
:)
r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
, CASE COZ 87.19
OBSERVATIONS
I
'"
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING D~,!,~
PAr.E
'4
9/8/87
1
To the immediate west of the subject property is zoned
and developed property also designated for Commercial
Land Use in the General Plan. Further to the west
across Medical Center Drive is commercially developed
and zoned property and the Martin Luther King Elementary
School. The school property has a General Plan Designa-
tion of Public/Quasi Public use. The commercial
property at the northwest corner of Baseline Street and
Medical Center Drive has a General Plan Designation of
medium density residential (8-14 du/acl.
~
To the south of the subject property is commercially
zoned and developed property on the north and south
sides of Baseline Street. Properties on the south side
of Baseline Street have a General Plan Designation for
medium-high density residential (15-24 du/acl.
To the east of the subject property lies similarly zoned
and commerically designated property fronting onto the
north side of Baseline Street.
5.
~RAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
Access to the subject property will be achieved from the
existing 1000 foot commercial footage along the Baseline
Street and the 500 foot frontage along the east side of
Medical Center Drive. Details of traffic and circula-
tion will be developed at the time of submission of the
precise development plan.
6. ~GENCY COMMENT
The San Bernardino City Police Department has stated
some concerns relative to the future type of commercial
usage. The closeness of the elementary school with over
700 students and the nearby residential areas would
cause the department to oppose future sales of alcoholic
beverages. (See Exhibit -0-. l
7.
~mrIRONMENTA!- CLEARANCE
Environmental issues such as traffic and the potential
liquefaction were discussed at several Environmental
Review Committee hearings. Traffic and circulation
concerns have been addressed on a broad basis under the
Northwest Redevelopment Project EIR which included an
analysis for General Plan Amendment No. 82-2 referenced
previously. Future development on-site will require
""
ceo ~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE COZ 87.19
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM {1.~
HEARING DATE 9/:/87
PAGE
that a detailed traffic analysis be conducted (Exhibit
"E") .
""
c
c
"'"
v
-.J
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE C02 8hl9
OBSERVATIONS
/14
9/8/87
'i
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
The subject property is located in an area having a moderate
liquefaction susceptibility for a Ms=8.0 earthquake on the
San Andreas Fault or a Ms=7.0 earthquake on the San Jacinto
Fault. The site has a moderate to low liquefaction suscepti-
bility for a Ms=6.75 earthquake on the Cucamonga Fault.
A detailed liquefaction
be necessary for the
specific placement of
determined. Subsequent
liquefaction report.
study, however, was not determined to
change of zone proposal since the
future buildings has not yet to be
development proposals will need a
The residents in the existing single family residential
structure fronting Baseline Street in existing commercially
zoned property will eventually need to be relocated. The
Redevelopment Agency is presently developing a relocation
plan for assisting those individuals or families that will
need relocation.
~.
At their regularly scheduled meeting on August
Environmental Review Committee recommended that
Declaration be adopted for the proposal (Exhibit
6, 1987, the
a Negative
"E") .
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the observations contained herein, staff recommends
approval of Change of Zone No. 87-19.
Respectfully submitted,
RAn
Di to
Ro ala
Senior
.c.
o
EXHIBIT Qt,
J
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ""
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
... ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
',.
A. BACKGROUND
l. Case Number (s) : CHANGE OF ZONE 87-19 Date: 7/9/87
2. Project Description: Change of zone from t-fTlI. Transitional, and
R-1-7200, Single Family Residential to C-3A, Limited General
Commercial on a 10.0 acre site.
3. General Location: Northeast corner of Baseline Street and
Medical Center Drive
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
YES MAYBE NO
-
l. Could project change proposed uses of land, as indi-
cated on the General Plan, either on project site or
within general area? x
- - -
2. Would significant increases in either noise levels,
dust odors, fumes, vibration or radiation be gener-
ated from project area, either during construction
or from completed project other than those result-
ing from normal construction activity? X
- - -
3. Will project involve application, use or disposal
of hazardous or toxic materials? x
- - -
4. Will any deviation from any established environ-
mental standards (air, water, noise, light, etc.)
and/or adopted plans be requested in connection
with project? X
- - -
5. Will the project require the use of significant
amounts of energy which could be reduced by the
use of appropriate mitigation measures? X
- - -
6. Could the project create a traffic hazard or
congestion? -
- -
7. Could project result in any substantial change in
quality, quantity, or accessibility of any portion
of region's air or surface and ground water re-
sources? x
- - -
... ~
. " "
MAY I'
EXHIBIT E
EAt. '01:11 A
PAGE I Of S
c
'~
'~
.. '---
_'11
(")
8. Will project involve construction of facilities in
an area which could be flooded during an inter-
mediate regional or localized flood?
9. Will project involve construction of facilities or
services beyond those presently available or pro-
posed in near future?
10. Could the project result in the displacement of
community residents?
11. Are there any natural or man-made features in pro-
ject area unique or rare (i.8. not normally
found in other parts of country or regions)?
12. Are there any known historical or archaelogical
sites in vicinity of project area which could be
affected by project?
13. Could the project affect the use of a recrea-
tional area or area of important aesthetic value
or reduce or restrict access to public lands or
parks?
14. Are there any known rare or endangered plant
species in the project area?
15. Does project area serve as habitat, food source,
nesting place, source of water, migratory path,
etc., for any rare or endangered wildlife or fish
species?
16. Will project be located in immediate area of any
adverse geologic nature such as slide prone areas,
highly erosible soils, earthquake faults, etc.?
17. Could project substantially affect potential use
or conservation of a non-renewable natural
resource?
18. Will any grading or excavation be required in
connection with project which could alter any
existing prominent surface land form, i.e., hill-
side, canyons, drainage courses, etc?
19. Will any effects of the subject project together
or in conjunction with effects of other projects
cause a cumulative significant adverse impact on
the environment?
:m.
x
MAYBE
a"')..
-
NO
-2.
-2.
x
-2.
-2.
x
-2.
x
x
x
x
~
uc. FOItM A
~AlE t OF .
('; 1'"'"\ l...
~ -""'Ill
C. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
If any of the findings of fact have been answered YES or MAYBE, then a brief
clarification of potential impact shall be included as well as a discussion
of any cumulative effects (attach additional sheets if needed).
(See Attached,}
D. MITIGATION MEASURES
Describe type and anticipated effect of any measures proposed to mitigate or
eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts:
(See Attached.)
E. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation,
0 We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 We find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
o We find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
(Secretary)
DATE:
.... '~
,
~
~
MAY 81
ElIC FOllIIl A
._50'5
c
o
o
~
Environmental Review Checklist
Change of Zone 87-19
C. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
10. Ultimate commercialization of the subject property
and its environs may cause existing single family
residential structures to become nonconforming
thereby unsuitable for residential use with poten-
tially requiring relocation of residents.
16. Subject property is located in an area having a
moderate liquefaction susceptibility for a Ms=8.0
earthquake on the San Andreas Fault or a Ms=7.0
earthquake on the San Jacinto Fault. The site has
a moderate to low liquefaction susceptibility for
an Ms=6.75 earthquake on the Cucamonga Fault.
D. MITIGATION MEASURES
10. Provision of relocation benefits as prescribed by
State Law.
16. Performance of liquefaction potential analysis in
order to determine necessary mitigation at the time
of submission of precise plan of development.
c-
o EXHIB.IT "!)" ()
Pbhu.' ~""'....; (. Moa<oL
.:J
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
300 NORTH "0" STREET S. B., CA. 9241B (114) 3B3- 5051
AGENCY COMMENT SHEET
ATTACHED IS A COpy OF: c...k""")L .... .,..- '€l1- l"l
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~..
......I t- 00 oW.. ""~
~;:.",:"':i\ ,,:::,,~.. ..~-;"~:;Wb'~1 . ~, "D~,....l~~ ~M..,ll, ..t-
I...~-L'I-IO. ".11..15. " ll,'2...D Z.l. 2~ 2....... '2,.C; 'V....t*A...1 (\ ~~
.A,P.N, (siQnoture)
"'-\0-81
(dote)
THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ANO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLEASE REVIEW THE EN-
CLOSED MAPS AND RETURN THIS SHEET WITH YOUR COMMENTS AND/OR
RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE THE E. R.C. DATE. IF DISAPPROVED, PLEASE STATE
REASONS, KEEP THE ATTACHMENT FOR YOUR FILES IF YOU SO DESIRE.
E.R.C, DATE: 7-~-A1 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE'
THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS APPLY TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM(S):
------8 APPROVAL 0 DENIAL
.
;x<t'YtUU!W+ (lfl.n~.u'_IAPt# ().b~(11 ~7j)-e, 1, (IfimfllMMCI {
MJ. . --rlll,C) 0 ,yo", ><l o_d th> .":/.u ),hk1 AAo d 1~1 e
Ji~ ..", l d I ;: ~ d () Q..;/I__h:! ./ a-tv.1 11Jr ld_~ J/) & ,fl 1c Xl -
~ fQ.JL~O o.o>-C'~'\A""'" Q __ (1) ( 'br, & .{.{.,! 'j t/Oo 6f;tlcO [<{.Ie j
d C~.> (~~Olfl~/), J9!) 0<t^ e Ai --f-4t _tJ()hSf..aI ~l~e..s
~~~~~ I->k'Yf/::/ ; <"'~~;:"J
_J
~QM-Jq"., fu.~
(siQnoture)
.5APi'l
(oQency)
7/$/ K-1
'(dote)
OCT. 'II "Y
Exhibit "0"
ERe FORM IC
_,. I ~-:-::l~ Ji
. _ 'I * .. ~'-'k-:;:;-~
-". u,. ]'~I'" J
, " .' ,!-
:.t:~lfil~ it _I~ '
_.' . .n ". 'bAllD M.,
"" ',~ ;."--"1' -=:l! ':-11'
_ ,i:-a ~I~-:-lr I, -; :
'I " -,- - -L ----1L
1- ~r-~l; ----,~
t -,--.i.__
\ i ~i'r ~B~- ~ :-El
J \I~A:: I-u
'm""". )il'tj~ '
~,,....;'U ' J~
\ \ ' ~.jr-:-_ tI:rtrTd I
'" ::1-{J[
H1[
'!,Hil
'"I,J"I[
'r
It
" ~ r
......... .' I,
.eo eo- ." ..:.:.:.:..:. _ 8ASEUHEJ!sJl
~'. it---fl'l
/<f~..r I,
~: " ;' " - - ;'
. --1 ,__.Ji
I,t--il ., "Il
;" i'~ri "]1
,,' ! I: '
.. '. I. , J'TH $TJI
. c ,j].='.LJ' !111: 'I, 1i ",r
. \_Jj[;2~:~l' -~14J~tujjj , : h~j: {",IClt-~; '1'1 1![
'ILtlll1;lr.c-~)-L""l-lt]Jt ~.f.".'rt'.'."..;.::JAl..tt.'~..JI 1.[.,1.,1][
11-'1' I ill r'lr4rj[J fC~" ::;,"I'".,. J ~ '.~'---.; 'l[
I ] I II I' I" _.,.)-.,...~Jt...~_~1 .,0-:-.
_ I I,.. ... I I! LLlJl"il lr' -,1 .,..,~]E;;.: .,,:eF ~._..k"urJ
~/-' ---- ------'T T---- __w -, -, -... ~--.---- _H -"-------<or
.
c
o Exhibit .C. ()
L N~
L_____1_~ l!\ - ~~ \
[ r r"~ i
__I. _Ji ~ Jl
r-~-ll- i---l .,
l I J.
\ -'I I[ ~--]l ~-\
\ ~ - r~-
, 1 -~
-_ -...,,=-.:.::.-n"'c.:..;.';
,
\
'\
\~
"
\~<\
\
".
"
~
1&1+*';
:~G~~D~V:ELDPMENT PRD,Et n~~1i
1".:,',.:,.,::1 S.F. LOW DENSlTvIO.3dv/ael - "'~/il.:
f-.,..;:,:...;.:.:! S.F. MED.-LOW DENSITY (4.7d.. K:~~;
EIm MOBILE HOME PARK(4-1c1u/oel
~::::::~::~:~ M,f" MEa. DENSITYIS-144u/oc)
~ ".F.: MED,-HIGH DEN. (IS'Z4du,AK:)
,
_ COMMERCIAL. '
~ PAOR:SSIONAL-OFFICE
~ COMMERClAL- INDUSTRIAL
~ INOUSTRIAl
m:EEi PUBLIC/QUASI. PUBLIC
~ PARKS 8 RECREATION
~ FL.OOD CONTROL
== PROPOSED STATE. HIGHWAY
~, m~
r:_.V_...-
NORTH SCALE IN FEET
7
"""
,
:)
l
<cO'
ebu
PROJECT AREA B
PROJECT AREA A
',~, \
\',
G.P.A. #82-2
\Nl(Q)~lf!K1~~~lf ~~ID)~~lL(Q)~[lli\}~lNlu ~lR1(Q)J~(clf
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
c
~xhibit "8"
.'\
-'
,-.,
v
AGENDA
ITEM #
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
"- HEARING DATE
tEJ' -1 Qj)
I l. . . . .. .. . .. . . .. ..
I ..
.,- I . . . . . . . . . . .
f-1-
. . 0 . . . . . . ..
.. . .. ., .. .. .. .. .. D
. . ., . . .. . .. ..
. . . . . . e . .
'-'-
I
i C!) f) G) e . ID.e I) f)
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. " ..
----
..
.....
'If-I " .
~.
!i.....
~ j
.
--
..;
C::.,. t.
I ~z/.N'r
.....
.,..
.
- i-t+ -- I
l' I.
.. -
~ liD . e ..
i . ~ , . . . I '^
.. .. ClI1I 1\1'
. - .~ .. . ~
.. . e I. ... I.
I . ~ .
. (i) ,. .. G). '0 0
G)~ !..e '.
ID~ '. 0
'" .,.
.
CASE
C02 87-19
9/8/87
4
. . . , . . . :~:
. G) G) f) ID f) e
" -
..
. . . e . . 8 . .
., .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
. .1.. D .. .. .. .. ..
. e ell!) f) e e I) Q)
SITE' -
e .
. ..
~
.
.
""~'d... ..... ,'.
--,--"..,. ......:.~ ..,...
;
.'. .. .. - -
e J
;! " "
. .. .. . . . ,
;- Ii) .' . a)':' lD CD ,
. <!l :.i.
.. e ;'
.. E> ,
. e . ~f'~
;
.. 4.'l .... . .
:::::::::::::::::::;:
imF:mmF:mm1 R-1-7200 SINGlE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
I::::::::::::::::::::
.....................
.....................
~ TRANSITIONAL
c
Ohibit · /J\
o
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE COZ 87-19
HEARING DATE ~(e/81
4
~
~; I = 1 . ~I.)
T.
11-1
".1 r/R-I A-P R-I
R-I R-I ~ R.I I ~
ii'". ,""iT" ,,"'- "i&io T
- CI
,R.I '1 '" "" ,..-- - IL.-::::: ,... 1"= 800' -
~'Z ~ R'I I It-!
",1 "'I~S R-I I'i'"
It-I It~ '"'-
" S R-I 1.
. L....- 11-1 R-I R-I
",1 It. I I Ii ~
R'I
~ I R-I It
It-1 ~:
"- ,,-, ~ It~ R-I 11
l~ R-I IH I[
",1 . - '-- J R-I
r"-I II I
... It'1 ",1 SITE 1\
-
",1 I kI
I~ "'1 ",1
I R-I
,,-I ,,~ "'111 ,,~ ?W
"-I ...... ~L
.... R'I
" -
".' ~ . C-3A R-I II
. "-I T "T C:s
. .0. T ///// T7/
, . ,~I T T
. c-M C:.. C:'1IA c:-..... EJiI ~
.'
1C-3A 0:01& c.,. I H S!::,r;;;;;;: 1ii1lij! C:cr C-3A c
-r T I T I-! I-'- ~ tl- f-!- .,L T f-L T
. . ,
, -. .......... "'"
. . .
M-" R-I 11.2 R-2 R-Z It<< R-2 "-Z "'1 "" .
"
, ",1' p.R.O. '= -'--
"0. IZ_ L I[
\; II~ I:I~:I El "z ,,~ ~I
. --- - [
- It-I ~I) r I
. .0. It.1 1I-2t r-.... ffil "'Z R-I
-
. It....~ ;Zl~ II-Z '/ ....-
.
r "-I
\,\ 11-2 --,~ I R-2 "
"-I R-I ',-
"0. R-2 R-I
II" I R-2 ( R-Z
~ ",Z - GB Ef]~ R-I I~' 11-1
.0. r.\-. I~ EEl
o. "-I Jl 11-'
r"\ / I II"
I II 11-'
R-I \\ R.Z W"'I II "-I R-I R-' R'I I( II-I
g--- R-I ( ( I( 11-'
"-Z R-I "., I( I.t
TTM or. TTM n
I ns'1 .... I 1111 U I ,r