HomeMy WebLinkAbout61-Planning
CI1CJ OF SAN BIRNARDIQ - REQUEO' FOR COUNCIL ACTO'N
. ".' ff fi)
David Anderson /I '
From: Acting Planning Director:::'C'O._ADMIM~a\!f~' Change of Zone No. 87-1
Dept: Planning.~Si l-i~R \ 2 PM 2:.4 '3 ::~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~i~: ~~e~:~: of
Dau: March 9, 1987
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Previous Planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on March 5, 1987, the
following recommendation was made:
The application for Change of Zone No. 87-1 was unanimously
recommended for approval of R-3-3000 zoning.
The Negative Declaration for environmental impact was also
recommended for approval.
Recommended motion:
To approve the responses to comments and to adopt the Negative
Declaration for environmental impact which has been reviewed and
considered.
To approve, modify or reject the findings and the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and to direct the City Attorney to
prepare the necessary amendments to the Municipal Code.
~r/~/
Signature David Anderson
Supporting data attached:
Staff Report
Ward:
383-5057
4
Contact person:
David Anderson
Phone:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. ~ (I
'C
o
o
:P-/~~/17
o
p~; ~-t, ~
lJ.h 14 L ;,., ft.-'<"1- ek-f~j .j{. W we>..>-
~? t..,t;.~+ r--- ~- 2- +0 11.- 3-1 Sou.
~ lr- )
~ 14 ,Yo
00 rn@rn~wrnIID
MAR 0 4 1987
$r.~FF
Fif.J,.; /uVG
F.IIS._#
O.t.. _.
V.D. __
A.l.
0..'.==
I:.r.
(,.fi.===
K.M....__
Id.l!. .._
M.....___
1.1.;:....-
n.r:
c.!:;. ~...~.-
Vil ...-
CI'''' l'l.p"P\"
. i ;."";''; DEPARTMENT
~Al. lJEfl:~ARDlNO. CA
o
o
o
0-'
CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SUBJBCT: APPLICATIOR PORCHAHGB OP ZONB NO. 87-1
Dear Sir: We the undersigned property owners and residents
of Block 2 Shady Heights subdivision object to the change in
the land use and zoning from R-2 to R-3-l899 Multiple
Family. Because it would not be compatible within this
block of single family homes, would cause more congestion in
the highly congested area of this location. Also, it would
be hazardous to the numerous children and residents living
in this area, Furthermore, the requested change would
decrease the value of the single family homes in this block.
NAME'
DATE
ADDRESS
, ~
~
"J
.,
cr~
-V
-~
o
o
o
--;ti-
fL! J E.
r
;;z. C.
. -.-.-
--'- -
ILl I - l:1o of. 6
ILl I E . 4 S HL ,\-1. ~ B .
--~. -
-
o
CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
11
1/')/87
4
l&.I
~ Change of Zone No. 87-1
U
OWNER:
an ra
East 50th Street
San Bdno., CA 92404
ame as a ove
~
l&.I
j
fJ
a:
.....
cr
l&.I
a:
cr
The applicant requests approval to change the zone from R-2, Two
Family Residential Distric4 to R-3-l800, Multiple Family Residen-
tial District on one parcel consisting of approximately .25 acre.
The project is located on the north side of 44th Street, approxi-
mately 153 feet east of Sierra Way.
PROPERTY
Subject
,>iorth
Soutn
East
West
EXISTING
LAND USE
Vacant
Single-Fam. Res.
Multiple-Fam. Res.
Single-Fam. Res.
Multiple-Fam. Res.
ZONING
R-2
"T"& R-1-7200
"T" & R-3-l200
R-1-7200
R-3-l200
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION
Res. 15-36 du/ac
Res. 15-36 du/ac
Res. 15-36 du/ac
Res. 15-36 du/ac
Gen. Commercial
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A ( SEWERS ~VES )
HAZARD ZONE IKI NO ZONE !KI NO OZONE B NO
HIGH FIRE oVES AIRPORT NOISE / oVES REDEVELOPMENT DYES
HAZARD ZONE I&l NO CRASH ZONE ~NO PROJECT AREA . iii NO
.J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z m APPROVAL
t! APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - 0
Z(I) MEASURES NO E.I.R. ~ CONDITIONS
l&.IC!) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO IL.Q 0
2Z IL.ffi DENIAL
Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
OQ WITH MITIGATING ;!:IE 0 CONTINUANCE TO
a:Z MEASURES (1)2
:;i&: 0
2. 119 NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS U
l&.I SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E. R. C. l&.I
EFFECTS MINUTES a:
NOV. "" RlV'aEO ~ULY .eel
IKY
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE rom: NO A 7 - 1
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
11-
3/5/87
2
1. The applicant is requesting a change of zone from R-2, Two
Family Residential District to R-3-l800, Multiple Family
Residential District on one parcel totalling approximately .25
acre.
2.
The site under review is
Street, approximately 153
is currently vacant.
located on the north side of 44th
feet east of Sierra Way. The parcel
3. The requested Change of Zone is being filed in order to
facilitate the construction of a multiple family residential
complex on said property. The measurement of the parcel under
review is approximately 79.8 with 136 feet in depth and having
frontage on 44th Street. Thus, due to the limited size of the
parcel, 10,838 square feet, the proposed development will be
somewhat restricted, in addition, the City of San Bernardino
has just implemented a new R-3 zoning Ordinance which could
further limit the size of the proposed development.
4. Existing land use and zoning is varied within the immediate
area. To the north and east of the site, single family
residential units are witnessed with accompanying R-1-7200,
Single Family Residential and "T", Transitional zoning. To the
immediate south and west, multiple family residential units
with R-3-l200, Multiple Family Residential and "T",
Transitional zoning is designated. The newer development
within the immediate area is of a multiple family nature which
reflects the City of San Bernardino General Plan designation of
Res.idential 15-36 dwellings per acre. In addition, field
investigation by staff witnessed multiple family residential
units on the easterly side of Sierra Way from 44th to 46th
Streets near the project. The single family residential units
appear to be approximately 1945-1955 vintage in construction.
As noted by the surrounding zoning and land uses, the
transition from single family residential to multiple family
residential development along 44th between Sierra Way and
Sepulveda Avenue and the area to the south of 44th Street has
been established. The proposed change of zone would be
consistent with that trend. It is, however, recommended that a
less intense zoning designation of R-3-3000, which provides a
density of 14 units per acre, would be more compatible with the
size and dimensions of the lot and the existing single family
residences to the north and east.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE C.07 NO R7 -1
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
11
J.'5/~7
5. The project is located on 44th Street which is classified as a
wlocalw, inaddition, an alley to the immediate west of the
project gives the developer additional vehicular access to 44th
and 45th streets. The existing road width and improvement are
adequate to accommodate the additional density as proposed by
the requested change of zone.
7.
The Environmental Review Committee reviewed
87-1, at their regularly scheduled meeting
1897. The Committee's recommendation
favorable for the issuance of a negative
above referenced Change of Zone.
Change of Zone No.
held on February 4 ,
at that time was
declaration on the
RECOMMENDATIOll
Based upon
adoption of
of Zone No.
districts.
the observations contained herein,
the proposed negative declaration and
87-1 with the change of zone from R-2
Staff recommends
approval of Change
to R-3-3000 zoning
Respectfully Submitted,
DAVID ANDERSON,
Acting Planning Director
Planner
Q
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
..... , ""l
A. BACKGROUND I
1. Case Number (s) :Ch..ngp nf 7.nnp. Nn R7-1 Date:l/22187
2. Project Description: To change the zone from R-2. Two Familv
Residential on a .25 acre site to R-3-l800. Multiple Family
Residential.
3. General Location: North side of 44th Street. approximately 153
feet east of Sierra Way.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
YES MAYBE NO
-
1. Could project change proposed uses of land, as indi-
cated on the General Plan, either on project site or
within general area? X
- -
2. Would significant increases in either noise levels,
dust odors, fumes, vibration or radiation be gener-
ated from project area, either during construction
or from completed project other than those result- X
ing from normal construction activity? - -
3. Will project involve application, use or disposal
of hazardous or toxic materials? X
- -
4. Will any deviation from any established environ-
mental standards (air, water, noise, light, etc.)
and/or adopted plans be requested in connection X
with project? - -
5. Will the project require the use of significant
amounts of energy which could be reduced by the X
use of appropriate mitigation measures? - -
6. Could the project create a traffic hazard or
congestion? X
- -
7. Could project result in any substantial change in
quality, quantity, or accessibility of any portion
of region's air or surface and ground water re- X
sources?
lo..
.
MAY I'
lAC. '0IlII A
_I I Of' 3
~ Change of Zone No. 87-1
IIAY'II
C Mtng. 3/5/8
8. Will project involve construction of facilities in
an area which could be flooded during an.inter-
mediate regional or localized flood?
9. Will project involve construction of facilities or
services beyond those presently available or pro-
posed in near future?
10. Could the project result in the displacement of
community residents?
11. Are there any natural or man-made features in pro- .
ject ares unique or rare (i.e. not normally
found in other parts of country or regions)?
12. Are there any known historical or archaelogical
sites in vicinity of project area which could be
affected by project?
13. Could the project affect the use of a recrea-
tional area or area of important aesthetic value
or reduce or restrict access to public lands or
parks?
14. Are there any known rare or endangered plant
species in the project area?
15. Does project area serve as habitat, food source,
nesting place, source of water, migratory path,
etc., for any rare or endangered wildlife or fish
species?
16. Will project be located in immediate area of any
adverse geologic nature such as slide prone areas,
highly erosible soils, earthquake faults, etc.?
17. Could project substantially affect potential use
or conservation of a non-renewable natural
resource?
~r.
18. Will any grading or excavation be required in
connection with project which could alter any
existing prominent surface land form, i.e., hill-
side, canyons, drainage courses, etc?
19. Will any effects of the subject project together
or in conjunction with effects of other projects
cause a cumulative significant adverse impact on
the environment?
!M
MAYBE
NO
II
x
x
x
.x..
.x..
II
II
lL
II
II
x
Uc. foil.. A
PAlE t 01' 5
Change of Zone No. 87-1,
Mtng. 3/5/87
C. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
If any of the findings of fact have been answered YES or MAYBE, then a brief
clarification of potential impact shall be included as well as a discussion
of any cumulative effects (attach additional sheets if needed).
D. MITIGATION MEASURES
Describe type and anticipated effect of any measures proposed to mitigate or
eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts:
E. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation,
ug We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECIJUtATION will be prepared.
[] We find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPA.~ED.
[] We find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ita, '.':C ( /1-;,<;)
(Secretary)VAU1Ut; C. RU~~, Ass~stant Planner
DATE:
.ir.:v'.. . ", '/.
,
":';
.
MAY -..
DC. 'OMI ..
._sews
o
r.'~ . .' ,
~R.fil
H.
.......
..-,)
, 0
.
J...:L
........ - -~-
~t: ,t
o. il
~ ~= ..
(Ill
.
~:
@
~.
'.:l.~'., ", ..' ',.0.".'
. ~r .'"
..;.;.,:,.;.,. 0
. .(!)
. ,
.... "-. -. '.,...
': .--~j~l':
J -9 "
.
,
l
..(9
~.
...:~..
,lr .
,
. . ....
.
.
iI
.
-
-
.11
II
.11
II
"
..J
.. <:
"''>>
'.. ..
~~
pHi
",'
~jI
~8
,.' .'
..
<II: .e
-e
-Q
.(il
~. @)
.
.. =
S "II
I) ..
I.
,.;",
.t
. e>
; I , i)a
.
IG r:;'"
..,.::*
.
h~.,.--. Cia
~
l jJ~
q
(t ~. <i
;; . .
I <Ii
I i @
__L_
a _.1
r~r I ~ 0 1
: .: .J.. ~.tt, .
....-..-,- i i ~ ~
e,!
ell
@)l!:
=:@)
@)!I!
"
..
~
..
.
o
o
o
:)
LOCATION
CASE C02 NO. 87-1
HEARING DATE 3/5/87
AGENDA
ITEM #:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
11
R'I
~
R-t
R-I-'ac
R-I R-I
R-I lUll. R-I
....... R-I
R-I ~ .
R-' R-I
R-I R-I
I R- .... . . R-'
R -I R-I . . L ..~:::"'
...
T 0
j [] :....: R-I
~.' '~-';' .....
R.I R-I R-'
R-I
"'3
"0"
S,TE
"0"
I-I
~.,
~ ~..
"
t
~~;;;:::~;~: ~.
:'~7~~:';;. ".~"'"
~., ,~, ....'
b.~;Jii:,-~~ ,.
F,E,~':"~' .,'
m::"u,"',;",
~-l1Si~';,~
l;t~..,_. .
r;.:.t"...
~:_tf.'
,X'i-;:. ~..
Ita - .
l. .,
~~:i ;~':c
P':'!"_c
""~ .. :'.' , '"
'-;i:;~",' .
;-,,::-'....,: .
~~.-:..-~
~ -. !
~i:':,:".
r~~~:i~"
:,::~~,~:\
: .-i~;.~':
. ._,;:~;:~-:-.-"
":(
'oM'
'!)
'"
,-.',
'.'
"
c
~ CITY OF
o 0 .-
SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
...-
o
DEPARTMENT ""l
APPLICATION FOR
CHANGE OF ZONE NO.
\...-
.;,....<1.
. OWNElt:' ,.l'aw.A~,. &S8.ndra: :;r..,: "
ADDRE;S' 'Marzullo'
APPLICANT :
ADDRESS:
..
.m
..!......~ -
.lj~ ".'P
248 E. 50th Street
san Berr.ardino. CA. -. 9240 . TEL:
>(114) 881-1922.. . . c'
same as OWnEr
';,-,
. '1:;'ii PUJTlNG ZONE':: T
;.~ -:;'~-:~f'l~ a:' ~;_-.,~;: -:<~~:;~r;-,tZ;:?~_.
~; '" Pfi<JlI'OSf:~ 10,." '..
'.' a' ", .,.., ~.,.,o~. ". '."".:"."".'." ....,...
"".,', _ ,..0 .-......,.......",..,.....
'.-~ .. ~ ,'_~~.........:',l;toI..:\..- "~!
',0 GOIEIIAl. MIl DESIGtt.A1I011:' "
"MY:ltl,tf~I!'~"~~.L.L~ pnlt
81-1
;~
"
.
,
lEG..L DESCRIPTIOfI 01" PftOPUTY, (ATTACH ADOtTIO..AI. SHEETS IF NECESSARY)'
ASSESSOlt'S PARCEL, ~ #0154-19'3-14 '.-> . ...... '. ' .
pfUoc.l No.'~. i)f~rcel~pN~. )'77'1. fit. the. County of San Bernardino.
Stat. of CalUorn~a. a-,,'per Map recorded in Book JIt- of Farcel Maps, .'. .
Pap. ?1.. in tb,eOffice .ef..theC()unl;Y. R.eorde~ of.Sai-4'<COWlty. . ..
.'-' ',..., ~ -. - ~"""'- .,'.. -" -- '-,. '.. .-' ,'-- .. . -', -. ;' ,...:
..:_... ""!_ _'<, __:;-~-"_",.",":' :..... -.,-,,- '''l'
'. ," ... ~.
:l;
cJ':
REASON. FOil CH....GI 01' ZOHR REOUl!sr:
,';P.
Would l.ike to build<~*.Muit1.";P'll~lY,DWell~ng units.
SUBMITTALS:
o APPLICATION (3 COPIES)
PItELIMINAItY TIl\.R REPOlIr Olt GRAN'!' DEED
o 500 FT. PROPERTY OWIIIII's MAP (EXHIIIT A)
o MAP OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (10 COPIES, FOLDED 0 LETTER 01" CERTIFICATllla (NOTARIZED)
TO a VZ"XII")
o PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTIO,. 0 LETTER 01" AUTHORIZATllla (NOTARIZED)
FORM
o GUMMED LABELS (2 SETS) 0 TIWISPAREHCY OF MAP
SIGNATURE OF
LEGAL OWNER (S)
DATE'
DATE'
DATE'
DATE APPLICATlDN RECEIYED' ~
DATI APPLICATION ACCEPTED:
1!.1lC. MUTINe
. C. ...u,...
MI'l.C. MUTIN.
( OAPPROVED
)
ODENIED
MAACN '... ."
~z._..
0-- 0
.
o
March 10, 1987
ua .~ ~ n " \~ -ffi ill)
. ~~R l:i 1{98tf
"'y ;P"'AN1{l~GQIiPAR~MiNT
tit,. . "'''';~..aDIiIIIl'I 'r.&.
~~...
Dave Anderson
Acting Planning Director
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92410
Dear Mr. Anderson,
I am writing you regarding my application for a change of zone (#87-1) from
R-2 to R-3-1800.
I would like you to reconsider the Planning Department's recommendation of a
zone change from R-2 to R-3-3000 instead of the requested change to R-3-1800.
The square footage of my property is 10,838 square feet. The Planning
Department's recommendation would enable me to build 3.6 units. As you know,
a .6 unit is not feasible. 1 would, therefore, appreciate your consideration
of our application as proposed. I feel that with the current building
ordinances (set-backs, parking requirements, etc.), I would be able to build
a maximum of {41 units.
My wife and I intend to occupy one of the units when completed. We currently
own and occupy a multi-family dwelling located approximately 50 feet from the
subject property. We allow a maximum of three persons per 2-bedroom unit and
wi 11 be requi ri ng the same 1 imits for the new uni ts. The property we res ide'
in is approximately half the size of the subject property. We house four
2-bedrooms units, .four enclosed garages, four additional parking spaces and
one refuse bin. The units are well-kept and show pride of ownership.
The units we are planning to build on the subject property would be archi-
tecturally designed to be a definite improvement to the area. Although the
subject property is properly maintained, it is a vacant lot and a terrible
eyesore. The residential properties in the area were built in the 1950's
and have reached their maximum value (see attached letter). The new units
would not have a negative effect on the area population or property values.
(Approximately 12-15 people would reside on the premises.)
Because my proposed development will have the necessary space to include two
enclosed parking spaces plus one additional on-site guest space per unit,
this action will not have a negative impact on the parking or. traffic flow
situation in the alley or surface streets.
It is my hope that you will take the above information. into favorable consi-
deration at the City Council meeting at which this request will be discussed.
Thank you for your help in this regard.
Si ncere ly,
aa49iJ-
~f-tl!dfJdtJ
Sandra L. Marzullo
Paul A. Marzullo
IF
RourlNG
fA">. ..,.,...,\.
Ok ~
V.B._
A.L._
O.'1~._
E.:j. _,_
G.t:.___
""_F.
~,t.;. .
I!.F.
ttL :~. . .._~_
~
f' ~'...,__
s. ;.,'.. ..__
vn
(;;) .
o
.
l
PonOrosa InvesOents
P.o. Box 22099
San Bernardino, California 92406
(714) 882-0707
Appraisals
Commercial Loans
Paul Marzullo
248 East 50th Street
San Bernardino, CA 92404
Dear Mr. Marzullo,
In my opinion your proposed four-pIex will have no effect on the value of the
single family properties In the area surrounding your proposed project.
In our appraisal process we would not take a single four-plex Into our overall
evaluation of the surrolUldlng properties.
,
---
James L. Lorenz
Certified Real Estate Appraiser 111876
Certified Review Appraiser
Mortgage Lenderwrltier
-
~
o
Jamee L Lorenz
Owner/Broker
DlIIcow1t Trost Deeds
o
. .
o
o
o
PICTURE::;
CHANGE OF ZONE
#87-1
1. SUBJECT PROPERTY. View looking south to 44th Street.
2. SUBJECT PROPERTY. View looking north to 45th Street.
5.
4485 N. SIERRA WAY. The Marzullo residence.
mately 50 feet from the subject property.
4485 N. SIERRA WAY. The ~arzullo residence.
ing eastward. Residence is on the corner of
and Sierra Way.
Alley Way (Between 44th and 45Th Street). View looking
north. Alley way is located on the west border of the
subject property.
Approxi-
J.
4.
view look-
45th Street
6. House located on the east border of the subject property.
7. Typical late 1950's home located in the area.
.,.-