HomeMy WebLinkAbout49-Planning
c.4), OF SAN BI!RNARDd:b -
RI!QUI!g. FOR COUNCIL ACT~
t?1"~
Su~~t: Change of Zone No. 86-29
David Anderson
From: Acting Planning Director
Dept: Planning
Mayor and Council Meeting of
March 9, 1987, 2:00 p.m.
OM': February 25, 1987
Synopsis of Previous Couneil action: Mayor and Council continued from February 16, 1987.
Previous Planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on February 3, 1987, the
following recommendation was made:
The application for Change of Zone No. 86-29 was recommended for
approval, with the exception of Lot No.1 of Tract No. 12674.
The Negative Declaration for environmental impact was also
recommended for approval.
Vote: 5-2, 1 abstention, 1 absent.
R~ommended motion:
To approve the responses to comments and to adopt the Negative
Declaration for environmental impact which has been reviewed and
considered.
To approve, modify or reject the findings and the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and to direct the City Attorney to
prepare the necessary amendments to the Zoning Ordinance,
and
To direct the Planning Department staff to initiate a zone change
for Parcel No.1 of Tract No. 12674.
/0d//
Signature
David Anderson
Contact person:
David Anderson
Phone:
383-5057
Supporting data attached:
Staff Report
Ward:
5
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Sou ree:
Finance:
Council Notes:
75.0262
Agenda Item No, 49.
,
Q
o
o
'--,
~.
1635 Kendall Drive
San Bernardino, CA 92407
January 30, 1987
Planning Department
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Subject: Change of Zone No. 86-29
We a~e residents of 1635 Kendall Drive, San Bernardino, CA.
We are against the proposal to change the land use from R-3
to C-l. It should never have been changed from R-l.
The reason we are against the change to commercial use is
because it will increase the rate of accidents on Kendall
Drive.
1. There is a bus stop on the south side of Kendall
Drive a few feet east of the signal at University
and Kendall Drive (site area).
2. People drive very fast going north on University
Parkway while making a right turn (east) onto
Kendall Drive. This corner is very dangerous,
because of the way it sticks out causing people
to have to make an awkward, sharp right (east)
turn onto Kendall Drive. The people who must
make a left t.urn (south) from Kendall Drive onto
University Parkway, are in a very dangerous posi-
tion. We have almost been hit a couple of times
by those speeding around that corner. What will
happen when people try to avoid cars that are
parked on Kendall Drive as well as those in the
left turn lane?
Sincerely. ~ .
'7Y?~m. u-rb
Margaret M. Smith
Jim O. Smith
Si:JFF
RC!JTif:a
f.^-':;.__._
O,A. ".__
V.I\. __'__
A,L, __ ___
D.':'::. _'_
E.r;. '~'_n_
c.n. .._.._
K.P. ._____
M.~~. "_.__
M.F. ____._
M,f.'.____
n.:"J.
S. \
V.fC
Attachment
oom@~~~qrn[ID
FES 021987
CITY PlM!,.."" L~I'AFnMENT
SAN BERNARDINO, CA
FILE_
o
CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
e
--
1&.1
~
--
o
o
o
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WAR
Change Of Zone No, 86-29
OWNER:
e v ngton, et,a
5696 Arden Avenue
Highland, CA 92346
trnlversity Square
c/o Dennis Stafford
647 N, Main St., #2A
~
i
a:
"
CZ
1&.1
~
The applicant requests to change the land use zoning district
from R-3, Multiple Family Residential to C-l, Neighborhood
Commercial,
Subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 1,63 acres having a frontage of
approximately 177 feet on the south side of Kendall Drive and
located approximately 170 feet east of the centerline of
University Parkway,
PROPERTY
Subject
North
South
East
\olest
EXISTING
LAND USE
Vacant
Vacant
Single-Fam. Res.
Single-Fam. Res.
Vacant
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION
Res. Multi-Family
Res. Multi-Family
Res, Multi-Family
Res. Multi-Family
Res. Multi-Family
ZONING
R-3-3000
"0" & R-3-3000
R-1-7200
R-1-7200
R-3-3000
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A ( SEWERS 119 YES )
HAZARD ZONE 1X1 NO ZONE ~NO OZONE 8 oNO
HIGH FIRE DYES AIRPORT NOISE / DYES REDEVELOPMENT GilyES
HAZARO ZONE IXI NO CRASH ZONE KINO PROJECT AREA oNO
~ o NOT oPOTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z all APPROVAL
APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - 0
Z0 MEASURES NO E,I. R, ti CONDITIONS
1&.Ie!) o EXEMPT o E.l.R, REQUIRED BUT NO ...0 0 DENIAL
2Z ...~
Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
00 WITH MITIGATING ~2 0 CONTINUANCE TO
a:Z MEASURES 02
~ ;iL 0
Z gg NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ~
1&1 SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E,R, C.
EFFECTS MINUTES Ai:
NQY, lall nY'a D ~UL' I".
..,
.
o
o
o
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE r:m: NO RF.~?q
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
11
?/'3/87
. f"!l'
1. Reauest and Site
The request is to change the
Multiple Family ReSidential, to
Commercial on property consisting
located at the southeast corner
Street.
present zoning of R-3-3000,
that of C-l, Neighborhood
of approximat~ly 1.63 acres
of Kendall Drive and State
2. Backaround
The site
approved
establish
consists of lots 2 through 5 of Tract No. 12674
on May 8, 1984 by the Planning Commission to
a 5 lot multiple family residential subdivision.
3. Analvsis
~
The State College General Plan designates the site for
residential uses at 8-14 units per acre, however, the State
College Area General Plan provides that convenience centers
may be established in areas not designated for Commercial land
uses provided the site meets certain policy criteria. In
part, this criteria states:
1. The site (entire commercial, parking and landscaped area)
should not exceed two acres in size and only those
independent commercial services and retail uses intended
to serve the local neighborhood should be permitted.
2. The landscaping, architecture, signs, vehicular access,
parking areas, yards and setbacks should conform to the
residential character of the neighborhood. In order to
insure conformity for these isolated facilities, it is
recommended that all development be reviewed by the
Commission and conditions of approval be required.
3.
should be located at
generally serves the
-
Commercial facilities at this scale
a principal street or highway that
residential neighborhood.
The proposed site is 1.63 acres in size which complies with
the policy referencing maximum site area of 2.0 acres.
4.
o
o
o
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE (:07. NO R,,_?q
~
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM , <l
HEARING DATE 2')'137
PAGE' ;,
5. The Development Review Committee (DRC) now reviews all
commercial development proposals rather than the Commission,
as mentioned in the second policy. The procedures of the DRC
is to assure compatibility of a project with is surroundings.
The proposed C-l, Neighborhood Commercial zone includes
additional standards relative to setbacks, building height and
signage to help insure compatibility.
6.
7.
'-'
~
zone change does conform to the third policy, as
Kendall Drive which is classified as a State
The proposed
it fronts on
Highway.
There are no neighborhood commercial centers which exist in
the State College or Verdemont areas to serve the growing
population base for this region of the City. There are,
however, two large commercial sites presently zoned for
commercial uses which have not been constructed. One of the
major sites is located on Kendall Drive, immediately opposite
40th Street and University Parkway bounded by College Avenue
and varsity Drive.
8.
Lot No. 1 of Tract No. 12674 located on the east side of the
terminus of State Street, consisting of .5 acre is not
included with the requested zone change. Lot No. 1 is
presently owned by the City Water Department. Surface rights
for parking purposes may be granted to a commercial developer
of the proposed site following the approval of the City Water
Board. However, the Water Departments parcel would also need
to be rezoned from the existing R-3-3000 designation to the
requested C-l zone to accommodate any surface uses for a
commercial development of the subject site.
The site has frontages on three dedicated streets; ,Kendall
Drive, State Street and Sheridan Avenue. Kendall Drive has
restricted access except for the eastern most 86 feet of the
site. Any access from State Street and Sheridan Avenue would
draw an increased amount of traffic through the residential
area to the new commercial center. Vehicular impact would be
considered at the development proposal level and not at the
change of zone level.
9.
10.
Summarv
The subject site conforms with the intent of the State College
General Plan. The site will maintain adequate access of 86
feet on Kendall Drive and will provide access to the
residences to the south of the subject site without having to
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE C02 NO, 86-29
OBSERVATIONS
13
2&3/87 ,
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
further impact Kendall. Drive by having access onto state
Street and Sheridan Avenue. A commercial center of this type
is one which is needed within this area and with its
visib~lity from University parkway and Kendall Drive and with
the existing and expected population growth within the area,
the subject site should be viable for any commercial endeavor.
RECOMMENDb1JPIl
Based upon the observations and its consistency with the intent of
the State College General Plan', Staff recommends approval of Change
of Zone No. 86-29. Further, Staff would recommend that lot No.1,
Tract No. 12674 not be included in the Change of Zone.
Respectfully Submitted,
FRANK A. SCHUMA,
P1'71:;"
EDWARD GUNDY, Seni
r- CITY OF SAN BERNARDI NO PLANNING DEPARTMENT -...
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
10.
, -..,
A. BACKGROUND
l. Case Number (s) : Change of Zone No, 86-29 Date: 1/8/87
2. Project Description:
3. General Location:
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
YES ~ NO
l. Could project change proposed uses of land, as indi-
cated on the General Plan, either on project site or
within general area? .JL - -
2. Would significant increases in either noise levels,
dust odors, fumes, vibration or radiation be gener-
ated from project area. either during construction
or from completed project other than those result-
ing from normal construction activity? - - II
3. Will project involve application, use or disposal
of hazardous or toxic materials? - X
-
4, Will any deviation from any established environ-
mental standards (air, water, noise, light, etc.)
and/or adopted plans be requested in connection
with project? - - ..x
5. Will the project require the use of significant
amounts of energy which could be reduced by the
use of appropriate mitigation measures? - - ..x
6. Could the project create a traffic hazard or
congestion? - ----L -
7. Could project result in any substantial change in
quality, quantity, or accessibility of any portion
of region's air or surface and ground water re-
sources?
- - -
~
i ,
~-O
o
o
~
~
MAy'lI
o
lAC. ,_ A
....E I 01' .
,.
.
C. S1JMMA1lY OF FINDINGS AND CUKIlLATIVE EFFECTS
.
If any of the findings of fact have been answered YES or MAYBE, then a brief
clarification of potential impact shall be included as well as a discussion
of any cumulative effects (attach additional sheets if needed).
4/1 ~n'I'I"lftIoO"(,"'i1 5itelil of 2.0 .QI''I'"~~ ~,..g, P,:lo?m; H-:&-1 hy po' of ("y
#6 If Ca.lt-T'$lnR wi 11 nnr g,....Ant- SlIn g,,,,,,....,...nD,,,,hmonr plCl"l'"m-lt on to
K..nd" 11 n,. t-..."ffi,.. m11at' h~ ,..nnt-on .Alnng 't"'eiiAontial itrgets.
This will not create an unsafe condition, however it is a
compat: tv issue,
D. MITIGATION MEASURES
Describe type and anticipated effect of any measures proposed to mitigate or
eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts:
E. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation,
Ga We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] We find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
[] We find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMElf.rAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
J:JhUvu.ll#
(SecretarY)VALERIE C, ROSS, Assistant Planner
DATE: ~I ~./qf}7
()
II.. '~
.
'.
,0
o
COZ NO. 86-29 PC Mtng of 2/3/87
o
~
'-
'-
MAY II
o
uc._"
_SOl'S
.
o
o
o
o
.
....,. . .. . ...n.
,; ,
III TIlE CITY 0'''11 .&.....1..
TRACT NO."12674
. I, . '
1&1111 A ..DIYIIIOII Of' Lon.. TIll'" " TIlACT 110. lilT, AI .." PUT
Il&COIllllD III IOOll .', PAU to. A. LOT' 1 TIlIII .. TIUlI:T ..... AI
'Ill PUT IlleGlle.. III .1001 41, PAM '.,IlICC!llD' 0' Mil UMAllDIIIO COUIITY,
. . . 'TATE Of' CALIPO..IA
CllAI. '...TiI.CIYILI..."&.Ii...OLO...1T ,. .UIII, .I~
," '. -r".:.... ".
~
. '.: .~_I.~.. ..... '.
" ...
.....,
.' ~';L"
':":'".. I.
"
,.... c1r,""-
~~:~~.I
.'~"~.' -:_'
III
>
, -I-
. .. D'''va : ,iA"'...
_..' -. . ~ ~'. , .
.--;-~-~-~".-
..1, I'
. .
~', .
~
.
I
I !I
13
I:'~~'
1 , I
I
I
I
I
I
" I
i !
i I
t 77.!
I
Q
o
,0
.
III
1&
C
....
i
I ~
,,~
III.,,-,nol#t"~-....-.
~ ~
:='~~.."
~........
MALI
.. . I"
5
IU.A.. tlI ....1_
........., ,.. f'I/IIIII ..,~",
................,...,.......,.
=~=:t--::.~
1."'IlIIIU.W.....".,.. .
.,t".
.....,
......
.....'
-,.
..
II2I.U.
. Mr"""''''''''' ,..... .c.~......
._.,....AI......... .
CA.'.." ,..,UN_ .........,..........., . ,
,,... ...,.. . - .
....M..,...."rn~.;.;",;.... .
.......P'. ',..~."
....4.. .,,..,..,,..- .....,.,. ........
~_. ',.10. '.....
, ....... -- ,."......~,.
""..-.."."........., '
..,... lI~r .~
CIaIIU. ...',."" ..... .
..,...",.-.... ..
"""'''~ANlr. . ':. - \::
".
-
'\.... :~',.)'.~. ':)'" . ....
..;.... .,' .
. ":"
~."" ..
.;. ..'
.'
.!
.,
.: ."
r ..
"'.' .
. :--. . .~.
..".\;;...... :'.'
...,
. ,'.-
....,
. .'.~: ......: ;1~.
~
.
Q
o
o
o
,..-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
....
AGENDA ....
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE C02 NO. 86-29
HEARING DATE
2/3/87
13
to...
'-
.0.
SAN BERNARDINO STATE COLLEGE
.0.
7.
'17
PRD
&u/ao
110"
R-I
_7 PAll"
'-
H
PRD
14u/GC
R-I
R.I
/
If-IA
,
c
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR
CHANGE OF ZONE NO. f!itc?~2(i
OWNER: J.lA.ZOL.P v. 'E't..1I/~To,.j d-~.
ADDRESS: 5W'\c- ~ /WIC..
H'''~., I CA. "lZ.3'W.
TEL (114 ) 71" - Z-lc-4
\Jr.)\IIOf.!>IT'j SQv E
APPLlCANT% t:EN~'/~ S"TN"FLiZ.o
ADDRESS: (P41 ,.,L. ""AI..,) lST. <flU
~'\I€lZ!>'pt, CA.. "ll..9>1
TEL: ,'4--l!..U..- S'30,
EXISTING ZONE:
12--3
PROPOSED ZONE: GENERAl. PI.AN DESIGNATION:
C-I 1Z.€S-Cj,-I+ 'DlJ/ A-c.
I.EGAI. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (ATTACH ADDITIONAl. SHEETS IF NECESSARY)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEl. NO, 2/,(, -1"11 - I ,'Z.,5 i S'-ll'
L-O~ "Z -s .) T~T /2'-14-: i't:la- M. e. '!>3') i"&. 35-37
REASON FOR CHANGE OF ZONE REQUEST:
TO Au_o...,) T\.\~ ~o...'l OF- '" ~Et6H~0Cl0
ce..I~
Cc:a.lAot az.:..,\<..
SUBMITTALS: 0 PREI.IMINARY TITI.E REPORT OR GRANT DEED
o APPI.ICATION (3 COPIES) 0500 FT, PROPERTY OWNER'S MAP (EXHIBIT A)
o MAP OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (10 COPIES, FOI.DED 0 !.ETTER OF CERTIFICATION (NOTARIZED)
TO 8 V2"XII")
o PREI.IMINARY ENVIRONMENTAl. OESCRIPTlON OI.ETTER OF AUTHORIZATION (NOTARIZED)
FORM
o GUMMED I.ABEI.S (Z SETS) 0 TRANSPARENCY OF MAP
"-
SIGNATURE OF 101
..
I.EGAI. OWNER (S) ,....
..
&-DlIITE:
DATE:
ATE:
\\. --""..>?ole
/{-,;Lon
//- It.. .i(
DATE APPI.ICATION RECEIVED: /~/.o</-P6
DATE APPI.ICATION ACCEPTED:
( OAPPROVED
ODENIED
)
E,RC, MEETING
P. C, MEETING
M/C,C. MEETING
MARCH '14 ."r
c.z. Fait.. A