The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About41-Planning & Building CITY OF SAN BER~IRDINO - REQUEST~OR COUNCIL ACTION From: Al Bouqhey, Director Subject: Tentative Tract No. 15228 Dept: Planning & Building Services Mayor and Common Council Meeting June 15, 1992 Date: June 4 , 19 9 2 Synopsis of Previous Council action: On June 1, 1992, the P4ayor and Common Council continued this item to June 15, 1992. On May 4, 1992, the Mayor and Common Council continued this item to June 1, 1992. On April 20, 1992, the Mayor and Common Council continued this item to May 4, 1992. On P4arch 3, 1992, the Planning Commission motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 15228 did not carry, and the application was forwarded to the Mayor and Common Council for final determination. Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council appro•~e Tentative Tract No. 15228; or That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council deny Tentative Tract No. 15228. lure Al Boughey Al Boughey 384-5357 Contact person: Phone• Staff Report 5 Supporting data attached: Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.l 1Acct. Descriation) Finance• Council Notes• • ''~w-••.. _...:'~13~MIIIIIIIII f111111111M11M1M - _ -.u __._.___-. CITY OF SAN BERN~iDINO -REQUEST ~R COUNCIL ACTION y STAFF REPORT Subject: Final determination for Tentative Tract No. 15228, a request to establish an 18-lot single family subdivision. Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 15, 1992 REQUEST Pursuant to Development Code Section 19.66.070, the applicants request approval of Tentative Tract No. 15228, to subdivide a parcel into 18 single-family residential lots. The request is before the Mayor and Common Council because a motion by the Planning Commission to deny the project failed by a tie vote. The subject property consists of 5.71 acres located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue in the RL, Residential Low, land use district. BACKGROUND November 19, 1991 The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on Tentative Tract No. 15228 (See Exhibit 1, Certificate of Mailing and Proof of Publication). After staff's presentation of the staff report, the Commission was advised that Staff received comments by telephone from Ms. Pat Smith, 3288 Meyers Road, on the day of the hearing. Ms. Smith stated that her property abuts the subject property and expressed concerns regarding the removal of trees, the lack of sewers and asked if it would still be legal to stable her stallions if the proposed subdivision is approved and occupied. After the opening of the public hearing, Donald and Jean Hanson, 180 W. Fiesta Green, Port Hueneme, spoke in favor of the application. Mr. Hanson stated that he and his wife own approximately 10 acres across the street from the subject property and they feel that the proposed subdivision would have a positive effect. Gary Smith, 3288 Meyers Road, then spoke in opposition to the request. He stated that the proposed lot sizes and density are incompatible with the existing development in the area, citing his and three other one-acre residential properties abutting the subject property to the south, which are the result of a four-lot subdivision approved in 1980. According to Mr. Smith, the recently approved smaller lot, higher density developments are destroying the quiet, low density character of the area. Mr. Smith also 75.026a ~ O Tentative Tract No. 15228 Request for Final Determination Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 15, 1992 Page 2 claimed that the arborist report prepared for the subject property was false. June Reeves, 3414 Belmont Avenue, spoke in opposition to the proposed subdivision, citing a lack of sewer service on Belmont Avenue and drainage concerns on Magnolia Avenue. Steven Levy, 1398 Meyers Road expressed opposition to the application, also citing drainage concerns. Sam Zayed, 3308 Meyers Road, spoke in opposition to proposal. He stated that he recently moved into the area and has invested in improvements to his property under the impression that the area would continue to be comprised of one-acre lots. Eugene Ehe, civil engineer for the project, then responded to the drainage and sewer issues. He stated that proper drainage could be carried to Belmont Avenue; however, due to the lay of the land, a drainage easement would be required along the neighboring property to the east (A.P.N. 261-071-2, 3, 9). The proposed conditions of approval require that the subdivider obtain the easement prior to recordation of the final map, but the neighboring property owner is unwilling to negotiate at this time. He also stated that all trees removed as a result of the development of the subdivision shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio, as indicated in the proposed conditions of approval. A motion then carried to continue the hearing to December 10, 1991 so that a representative from the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department could be present to answer questions regarding drainage issues, the proposed street design, and policies and procedures for the filing of final maps. December 10, 1991 A quorum of the Planning Commissioners who originally heard the item on November 19, 1991 was not present, and the item was continued to January 7, 1992. January 7, 1992 The Planning Commission continued the item to March 3, 1992 at the request of the Planning Director. The purpose of the continuance request was to allow the applicant to make a final attempt to negotiate for an off-site drainage easement through the neighboring property to the east prior to taking action on the tentative map. This request was made because, pursuant to Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, if the City imposes a condition of approval Tentative Tract No. 15228 requiring the subdivider to obtain an ~ o Tentative Tract No. 15228 Request for Final Determination Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 15, 1992 Page 3 easement for offsite improvements, and the subdivider is unable to obtain the drainage easement by the time that the final map is filed, the City will be compelled to acquire the easement through eminent domain; in turn, the City would require the subdivider to pay the cost of acquiring the easement. March 3, 1992 Staff advised the Planning Commission that the owners of the neighboring property are still unwilling to grant off-site drainage easement rights to the applicant, so the proposed conditions of approval will require the subdivider to obtain the easement prior to recordation of the final map (Standard Requirement No. 18, Exhibit 4, Attachment D), potentially compelling the City to condemn the property. Commissioner Stone then asked staff if the proposed temporary dead end at the eastern end of the subject property would obligate the owner of the neighboring property to the east to continue the street if the adjacent parcels are ever developed. Staff responded that the neighboring property owner would be obligated to continue the street. Commissioner Stone then expressed concern that the neighboring, larger property would be "held hostage" by the subject property. A motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 15228 then failed by a tied 3- 3 vote. As a result of the failed motion, the application was forwarded to the Mayor and Common Council for final determination. April 20, 1992 The item was continued by the Mayor and Common Council to May 4, 1992. May 4, 1992 The Mayor and Common Council continued this item to June 1, 1992 to enable the applicant to redesign the subdivision to eliminate the need for a drainage easement. May 14, 1992 The Director of Public Works/City Engineer submitted a memorandum to the Planning Division which evaluates the revised plan. The memorandum indicates that the modified drainage design "eliminates the need for any off-site easements and is acceptable to the Director of Public Works/City Engineer." The memorandum also contains amended language to Standard Requirements nos. 9 and 18 so that they correspond to the revised subdivision map. The amended Q Tentative Tract No. 15228 Request for Final Determination Mayor and Common Council Meeting of June 15, 1992 Page 4 language has been incorporated into the revised Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements (Exhibit 3) June 1, 1992 At the request of staff, the Mayor and Common Council continued this item to June 15, 1992 to allow Planning Division staff to review the revised plan and to prepare revised findings and conditions, which are contained in Exhibits 6 and 7, respectively. These revised findings and conditions supersede the original findings and conditions contained in Exhibit 4. oPT70NS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL The Mayor and Common Council may approve Tentative Tract No. 15228. OR The Mayor and Common Council may deny Tentative Tract No. 15228. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of Staff that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration; and 2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 15228 based upon the attached revised Findings of Fact (Exhibit 6), and subject to the attached revised Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements (Exhibit 7). Prepared by: Gregory S. Gubman Assistant Planner for Al Boughey, AICP Director of Planning and Building Services Exhibits: 1 - Revised Findings of Fact 2 - Revised Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements 3 - Revised Tentative Tract Map 4 - Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated March 3, 1992 Q CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT " AGENDA ITEM FINDINGS OF FACT HEARING DATE 6-15-92 PAGE 5 Findings of Fact 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, in that the purpose of the map is to provide for the development of single-family homes at a density of 3.1 dwelling units per acre, as permitted within the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use district. 2. The design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan in that the minimum proposed lot size is 10,800 square feet, as required in the RL land use district. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed: the tentative map conforms to the subdivision design standards of the Development Code; the proposed street complies with the minimum standards of the Public Works Department; the two routes of access can be improved to meet City standards; water and sewer service can connected to the existing system in Magnolia Avenue; drainage can be directed to an approved public drainage facility via Magnolia Avenue. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the subdivision design complies with all lot area and dimensional standards, as well as required public improvements standards. 5. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, in that mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and conditions of approval to protect, relocate and replace the existing trees on site. 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that environmental health concerns are addressed and mitigated through the design and construction standards of all public services and public and private structures. 7. The design oP the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for . access or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, in that no such easements traverse the subject property. u°'~'inw°n«""wn~oa ?W1~08 PKiE f OG t IK0) 0..4.:1. { } T ~-_-- ® Q CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE - -92 PAGE 1. No tree shall be removed, replaced or relocated prior to the issuance of a Tree Removal Permit. The removal, replacement or relocation of any tree shall be subject to the provisions established by the mitigation measures contained in the Initial Study for Tentative Tract No. 15228. 2• Walls and Fences: a. The perimeter walls adjacent to Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue shall be constructed of either slumpstone, split- faced block or stuccoed block with decorative caps. The walls shall have articulated planes, by providing at a minimum for every 100 feet of continuous wall, an 18- inch deep by 8-foot long landscaped recession. Pilasters shall be provided at every change in direction, every 5- foot difference in elevation and at a minimum of every 25 feet of continuous wall. b. All wood fences used within the tract shall be treated with heavy body stains or paints. 3. The final map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. Specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the II.S.P.S., the Public Works Department and the Planning Division. q• Building permits and utility clearances shall be issued in full compliance with Resolution No. 89-116, Resolution No. 90-02 and Ordinance No. MC-690. 5- No home shall be constructed, or building permit issued, without formal design review and approval of a Development Permit by the review bodies empowered by the City to approve or deny Development Permits for i8-unit single-family residential developments. PUN.Iq(1 PILE 1 OF 1 1~1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE Tf 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA fTEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE PAGE 7 6 Construction shall he in suhatantial conformance with the plan~s~ aDOroved by the Uirector. Development Review Committee. Planning Commission or Mayor and Common Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be subject to aDProval by the Director through a minor modification permit process. Anv modification which exceeds IUX of the following allowable weasurable design/site considerations shall require the refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if applicable. 1. On-aite circulation and parking, loading and landscaping; 2. Placewent and/or height of walls, fences and structures: 3. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of finished waterials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme: and, 4. A reduction in density or intensity of a developwent Dtoject. Within one year of developwent approval. cowmencewent of conatructiom shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall becowe null and void. In addition, if after cowwencesemt of construction. work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the permit/approval shall becowe null and void. Projects way be built in phases if preapproved Dv the review authority. If a project is Duilt in preapproved phases. each subsequent phase shall have one year from the previous phase's date of construction cowmencement to the next phase's date of construction comwencement to have occurred or the permit/aDProval shall becowe null and void. Project:-------------------- --------------------- Expiration Date: --------------------------------- m , ~,I,~q rwa~no nom, ov i ~~+m ~ 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE -I -9 PAGE 8 ____~_'___ The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause. grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code provisions. 8. In the event tAat this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the natter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City. its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required • by a court to Day as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. No vacant, relocated. altered, repaired oc hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use of land or structure~s~ shall be inaugurated, or no new business commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy nay be issued by the Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deoosit is filed with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The deoosit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terns, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the landowner shall file a maintenance agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain shall ensure that if the landowner, or subsequent owners). fails to maintain the required/installed site improvements. the Citv will be able to file an appropriate lien(s) against the property in order to accomplish the required ¦aintenance. ~,~ PIANiLO PAGE IOGI µf0 ~, ~ _ _ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 6-15-92 PAGE 9 __9______ This Dermit or approval is subject to the attached conditions oz requirements of the following Cit~• Departments or Divisions: ___X___ _ Fire Department X Parks. Recreation & Community Services Department Buildin¢ Services Division of the Planning and BuildinII Services Department Police Department Public Services tRefuae) Department ___x______ Public Korks sEngineering) Department X stater Department °~,°.. Puwaw v~ , oo ~ ~4am CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT gGENDA REM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 6-15-92 PAGE in ___10.____ This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction aad grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air pollution; glare control; exterior Lighting design and control; noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street parking a¢d off-street loading; and, vibration control. Scree¢ing and sign i regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer because they xill delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied xith. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility traasforsers, boxes. ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by xall or structural element. blending xith the building design aad include landscaping xhen on the ground. A sign program for all nex commercial, office and industrial centers of three or more te¢ant spaces shall be approved by the Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This requireme¢t also includes any applicable Land Use District Development Standards for residential. commercial and industrial developsents regarding minimus lot area. minimum lot depth and width. ¦inimum setbacks. maximum height. maximum lot coverage. etc. This development shall he required to maintain a ¦inimum of standard off-street oarking spaces as shorn on the approved plants) on file. a°Ai,M, "" °1"O° vlA/Nml PKiE 1 OF 1 (4Ym --mow CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 6-15-92 PAGE 11 __1i_---- A Composite Development Plan :CDP1 shall be filed with the Public Works and Planning and Building Services Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processing by the City. The CDP shall provide additional survey and map information including. but not limited to, building criteria (i.e. setbacks), flood control criteria, seismic and geological criteria. environmental criteria and easements of record. The CDP shall be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan", and contain a section entitled "CDP Notes" The applicant shall have listed under the CDP notes section the following conditions or mitigating measures required for the development of the subject property: 12. Within txo years of this approval, the filing of the final sap or parcel map xith the Council shall have occurred or the approval shall become null and void. Expiration of a tentative •ap shall terminate all proceedings and no final ¦ap or percel ¦ap shall be filed xithout first processing a new tentative map. The City Engineer ¦ust accept the final sap or parcel ¦ap documents as adequate for approval by Council prior to forxarding them to the City Clerk. The date tAe map shall be deemed filed with the Council is the date on which tAe City Clerk receives the sap. The review authority may, upon application filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause, grant an extension to the expiration date pursuant to Section 19.66.170 of the Development Code and the State Map Act. Project:__ Tentative Tract No. 15228 Expiration Date: June 15, 1994 .i m°nw~w s° PI,11N~07 PAnE t OF t µi0 ~F..`c? CITY OF SAN ERNARDINO PUBLI WORKS/EMOR. CASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ~ AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE 6-15-92 PAGE '' NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the app scant ~s responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainage and Flood Control All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer, which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. 1. _y_ A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to miti- gate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right- ~ of-way dedicated as necessary. The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. ~s rain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclu- sively show that the drain is not needed to protect your develop- ment or mitigate downstream impacts. 2. All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drain age facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfac- tion of the City Engineer. 3, Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge suffi- ciently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit requirements. Erosion Control 4. ~ An Erosion Control Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to grading plan approval. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. . CITY OF SA BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/EMOR. ~g TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AcEN~A ITEM HEARING DATE 6-15-92 PAG i Gradin 5, X If more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. 5, X If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. 7, X An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. PJhere feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is proposed to cross lot lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines. g, X The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. 9• X Standard Requirement No. 9 revised to read: "A Landscape Maintenance District shall ba established to maintain landscaping within the followlnq areas: a) Parkway area and landscape casement along south side of Ohio Avenue; b) Slome and drainage structure along back of lots 10 throuoh 16. A landscape easement shall ba dedicated to the City over this dome and a 6-foot combination wrouoht iron/block fence shall be constructed at the ton of slona• 10. X Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided Lor the landscape Maintenance District. CITY OF S/40 3ERNARDINO PUBIS? WO~RKa/ENOR. GASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE -1~- PAGE ~- Utilities 11. ~ Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City code, City Standard and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV. 12. Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer faci- lities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. 13. X Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be con- structed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. 14. X Utility services shall be placed underground and easements pro- vided as required. 15. X A11 existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in actor dance with Section 19.20.030 (non subdivisions) or 19.30.110 (subdivisions) of the Development Code. 16. X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A privata sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engin- eer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where practical. 17, A communication Conduit shall be installed in all streets with- in and adjacent to this project. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernar- dino. 18. X Standard Requirement No. 18 shall be amended to read as follows: "The City has constructed a drv sewer in Maano~ ~ a Avenue ~}g subdivider shall extend the line to Ohio Ave*+++~ and ~n Blackh wk Road. and constn+ct the miss~na oort+~*+s along Irvington Avenue and Magnolia Avenue from Chestnut Avenue to Be~mont Avenue unless this work ~s completed by others vrior to issuance of Build'na Pe~-++++*~ " CITY OF SAQ SERNARDINO PUBIQ~ WORKS/ENOiR. CASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE G-15-9~ ' PAGE 1S Ma in 19. X A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. 20. X All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. 21. X Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and set- backs, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-592. Improvement Completions 22. X Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire pro- ject shall be zompleted, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. 23. X If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ' ation of the Final/Parcel Map, an improvement security accom- panied by agreement executed by the developer and the City will be required. If the required improvements are not proposed to be completed prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, a deferred improvement agreement in accordance with Section 19.30.160 of the Development Code will be required. If the agreement is approved, an improvement certificate shall be placed on the Parcel Map stating that the required improvements will be completed upon develop- ment. Applicable to Parcel Maps consisting of 4 or less parcels only. 24. X Street light energy fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. 25. X A11 rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from the following streets: Ohio Avenue -- - --- qTY OF SAI~gERNARDINO PUBL~ WORtCa/E!lOA. CASE TR 1S9~A STANDARD REQI~IREMENTS . AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE F-~5-92 PAGE ' Street Improvement and Dedications: 26, X A11 public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 27. X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-Nay (Ft.) Curb Line (Ft.) Ohio Avenue ~ 30' 20' Magnolia Avenue 32' 18' Blackhawk Road 30' 18' 28. X A temporary turn-around shall be constructed at the Easterly terminus of Blackhawk Road. t 29 X Curb return radius shall be 25'. j 30. X Construct handicap ramp per Std. No. 205 at Southeasterly corner ofd Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue, and on both corners of they intersection of Blackhawk Road and Magnolia Avenue. 31. X Two means of access to this subdivision shall be provided conforming to Section 19.30.200 of the Development Code. Each ! access shall be at least 24' wide paved and dedicated unless i parking is allowed, in which case the access shall be at least 28' ~ paved width. Additional dedicated width may be required for drainage control. CITY OF $A BERNARDINO PUB~7~: WORKa/EMOR. ~E TR 15228 _ STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE6 PAG Required Engineering Permits: 3P, X Grading permit (if applicable.). 33, X On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), includes landscaping. 34. X Off-site improvements construction permit. _Applicable Engineering fees (Fees subject to change without notice) 35. X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map - E1,000.00 plus 530.00 per lot or parcel. 36. X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 3% and 2.5%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of off-site improvements. I' 37. X Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 1~ and 13, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of on-site improvements, including landscaping. 3g, X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required) - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. 39, X Drainage fee in the amount of E0.113/SF 52,205.48/Lot Max. 40. X Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of 5132.40/House Exact amount shall be determined by the City Tra ~c ng~neer at time of application for Building Permit. 41. X Sewer connection fee in the amount.. of 5235.43/Bedroom 42. X Sewer inspection fee E15.84 per connection *Estimated construction cost is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engineer. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. ,CASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM ~_1_~ HEARING DATE PAGE 1 S ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS - VERDEMONT AREA PROJECTS 43. X This development will be required to pay Infrastructure Development Fees prior to issuance of building permits in the amount of 56,976.00 per single family residence. 44. X This single family residential project lies within the Chestnut Storm Drain Fee boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of E0.133 per square foot shall be paid'(not to exceed E2 ,050.00 per lot) to the City prior to approval of building permits. This commercial, industrial, or multiple residential project lies within the Chestnut Storm Drain Fee boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of 50.138 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of building area, paving or other impervious area, and E0.046 per square foot in excess of 3,000 square feet, shall be paid to the City prior to approval of building permits. 45. X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Traffic Signal Fee area; therefore, a fee as approved by the Mayor and Common Council shall be paid to the City prior to approval of building permits. 46. X A 10' wide easement for landscape purposes shall be dedicated to the City along the South side of Ohio Avenue. the easement and parkway area shall be landscaped, including trees of a size, spacing and type suitable to the Department of Parks and Recreation as replacements for th existing trees being removed. The easement parkway area shalt be maintained by a landscape maintenance district. _- CITY OF SA~BERNARDIWO PUBIS WORKS/ENQR. GASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE 6-15-92 PAGE ~ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS - GENERAL 47. X A landscape maintenance easement shall be dedicated over the setback areas of each lot adjacent to public streets and a landscape maintenance district formed over these areas to maintain the landscaping in case of owner neglect. 48. X If this project is approved after December 1, 1991, it may be subject to requirements of the State mandated Congestion Management Program (CMP). Under the CMP, new projects which are heavy traffic generators will be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) addressing impacts from the site, and requiring mitigations. Threshold levels at which projects will be required to prepare a TIA have not been finalized. Status information and details of the CMP can be obtained from the City Traffic Engineer at 384-5213. ~.L..~. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO casE /s'~2~' STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING DATE :~•~- REVIEWED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS GENERAL ,2EQL'IRE`.IENTS: ( 1 Provide one extra set oP construction plans to Building atM Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check. 49 Contact Fire Department for specific or detailed requirements -IMPORTANT. The developer shall provide Cor adequate Fire Flow as computetl by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Fire Flow shall be based on square Coo[ege. construction features end exposure information as supplied Dy the developer and may be taken Prom two hydrants. ACCESS: ( ] Provide t:vo different routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, aB-weather. [ ] Provide an access roadway to each buildin¢ Cor Cire apparaT•s. Access roadway shall have an ell-weather driving surface of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width. [ ] Extend roadway to within I50-feet o[ all portions of the exterior yells of all single-story buildings. I 1 Extend roadway to within 50-feet of the exterior wells o[ ell multiple-story buildings. [ 1 Provide "No PARKING" signs whenever perking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of eceess roadways to less than the required witlth. Signs ere to read "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" (All caps). "M.C. Sec. 15.16". ( ] Deed-end streets shall not exceed 500-feet in lettgth and shall have a minimum 95-toot radius turnaround. 5~. ~ The names o[ any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. SITE: [ ] All access roads and streets ere to be constrocted antl usable prior to combustible cattstroctioe. ' ( ] Private fire hydrants shell be imiaLLed to protect each Duiltlittg located more than 150-feet tram the curb line. No fire hydrent should be within 10-feet o[ any erteriW wall. The hvdrent8 shell De Wet Barrel type, with ate 2~-inch and one 4-inch outlet, end approved by the Fire Department. Fire hytlrents arc to De protected from damage by providittg suitable [raffle Decriers. The area arountl the fire hydrant shell be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by peintittg en 8-inch wide, rcd stripe for t5-feet in each direction in front o[ the hydrant in such a manner that it wiB not De blocketl by parked vehicles. Suitable "NO PARKING" signs are required. Sl. ~ Public fire hydrants shell be ptovidea alatg streets at ~Oo-feet intervals for commercial and multi-residential areas eM at 500-feet intervals for residential areas. Instsllation shell conform to City speci[icatlons and be installed prior to combustible construction or storage. BUILDING: [ ) The address of the structure, in siz inch numerals, shW be installed on the buUding or in other approved loption in such s manner as to Oe visible from the frontage street. The color of the numbers shall control with color of the background. ( ] Identity each gas end electric meter with the number of the unit which it services. [ ] Fire extinguishers must De installed prior to the builtlittg being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher {s 2A IO B/C. }tinimum distribution of fire extimjuishets must De such that no interior part of the builditq) ri over 75-feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher. ( ] All buildings, other than residential over 5,000 square tee4 shall be provitled with en automatic [ire sprinkler system, designed to NFPA standards. [ ] Submit plans [or the fire protection system [o the Eire Department prior to beginning construction do the system. [ ] Tenant improvements in ell sprinklere0 buildings are to De approved Dy the Fire Department prior to constroctiat. ( ] Provide an automatic fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must De approved by the F[re Department, prior to installation. [ 1 Fire Department cennection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shW De required st curb Ilne. ecee-- _---:~zs=:~--~_ ~ = _~-- - r _ VOTE: The applicant must request. in writing, any change in these ur other requirements. ADDITIONAL [NFORSIATION: FPB >.~o ~;ay .~~,-. © .c sygL ig ~ ~n Bernardino City Water Departrtlli.t ' STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Review of Plans: # Tr. 1/15228 Date: Location: S.E. cor. of Magnolia & Ohio Aves. Approved: Type of Construction: To subdivide acres into 18 single resid. lots. Denied: Owner/Developer: Continued: ENGINEERING: Name: ~ ~ /I! 1114sN~ Oate: 52. P.S. I. ~y -~o ft,S/ 53. 2ZSize of Main Adjacent to the Project /~ ~ 1tl4TF_1P t~9id LR2 .~19/.~~n/_GEl ~ . 54. 2Z Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. 55 • $ Off-site Water Facilities Required to Meet Peak Flow Demand. 56. ,~ Comments: /~ - ~ s - SubjecttotheRules&RegulationsoftheWaterDepartmentineffectatthetimeofApplicationforWaterService. _ This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees/Conditions will be Determined by their Engineering Department. WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name:~.~~ L~s~rc Date: 9' a~Fj ' R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. = Air Gap Required at Service Connection. _ No Backflow Device Required. °'~~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name: L~A9~I Date: G/ '-~5 'g~ _ Industrial Waste Permit Required by Environmental Control Officer. _ Grease Trap Required by Environmerrcal Control Officer. = Pre-treatment Required by Environmental Control Officer. _ No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed Without Prior Approval. Approved by Environmental Control Officer. J ~ -rte SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: Fr/e'~<L ~/Yar~l'~!4 Date: 9' '~5 ' 9/ No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. 57 , ~LSewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the City Water Department for the Amount of F7i Of~~i Gallons Per Day. Equivalent Dwelling Units: 1~% _ Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. 58• ~ProofofPaymentMustbeSubmittedtotheBuilding&SafetyDepartmentPriortolssuanceoftheBuildingPermit. Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: .I16 7901 WATRSW isMnW r~m.n~4Oa ~ ©l7 1522 g crrsc ~ s~ B~u?~nao ~ea~o-rrrs o~ ~a,FUCS, ~c~,zzaa arm oorrsn~rrsr s~cFs pL~TIIJG DF~AErII'gNf YAOCE~URE A@ID PCII.ICY PCldt 7A~1D9CAPING APID IRRIGATION ASSFS9+ffNP DI~'!'RICPS JANi~C, 1988 , Asstssr~rr~i~sl~crs - nuucax~ort a c~aKPa~rns _ uuuca~'zua . 1. Separate water meter for the irrigation shall be required. 2. Separate electric meter for the irrigation controllers shall be required, 3. Valo~I M.P.C. controllers, with water miser feature, shall be used. Said controllers shall be enclosed in a "ia Max" enclosure fzntn the Valoon ~Y• 4. "Rain Guard" units fron the Hydro Visor Co~aany shall tie installed at each controller. 5. Valoon Hi-Flow series, rarote oontml valves, in angle pattern shall be used. 6. All irrigation sprinklers in planter areas and snail turf areas shall be Pain Bird 1800 series with M.P.R., 8-12 nozzles (Q-H-F), 7. All irrigati~ sprinklers in medium areas shall be 7bro, Super ?00 C. 8. All irrigation sprinklers in large turf areas shall be meson heads with rubber corers. 9. All sprinklers used shall be "pop-~~p" type. 10. All irrigation sprinklers strati be an triple swing joints. 11. All pipe 2" and lazger shall be class 315 P.V.C., all pipe 1~" and smaller shall be P.V.C. skdi. 40. 12. Rain Bird 3/4" quick coupler valves shall be installed every 100' in rrnmd plastic valve hooter. LANDSCAPE 1. Specific information on street trees a~ plant material will depend on project location. Contact City Parks Division for further infozmation. 2. Minimm plant sizes shall be as follows: ZYees: A. Open recreation areas - 24" box B. Street trees - All 24" txtt Stuvbs: . A. ~n oombinatian of 15 gallon and 5 gallon sizes ~ Zisfgrass: A. Setback areas shall be sod B. Open recreation areas shall be hydmseeded _ ~ Q~ rage at maturity slant sizes are to complete a dense and this project shall be maintained imiendations shall be regssired. Sample Y~ fran the date of written call be ors the landscape plans and shall ~s)' ,es of said sample reports shall be ape plans. not to exceed 3:1 slope. Said beradrsg a?til all elements of the project uxi form. :contract docsa~sts. Projects :ann of four feet (4') wide. ;established prior tiD the a all planter areas. =Paste all turf areas fs:rm shrub areas. shall not begin until after the turf shall not be mowed until :paste assessment district fran private :hes. Mow at ls5 rods height 3 Properly stsarpersed blade. ative 24 hours prior to this L1 be listed in the sheet index and shall ardsitect and the City must be a separate sheet. the maurter>at» ~~' Said i Division and shall be ors file. Ligation section for Assessment Districts. i carstisnsos>~lly meet ~ aessneJSt Districts Maintenance Period. the maintenance period will be it contractor has oorre~.~ted all is in the amount agreed upon with ms. Said monies are tso guarantee :ficiencies in the irrigation, end of the one (1) year (365 days) ~s--built drawings whirls shall be iucible and two (Z) blue lirse made to the City's represesstative. irrigation, larsd.4cape and hard 1 be the sole deciding party, regazding maintenarsoe period. ontact City's representative cos issq the arse (1) year (365 days) be by telephone or oth~s means ct is to review the status of the . project, ~ district portions aailyR' It shall also be the responsibility of the contractor and/or designee to leave a business address and telephone numbPx with the City's representative. 2. During the maintenance period provide all watering, weeding. fertiliz- ing, cultivating and spraying necessary to keep the plants and turf in a healthy growing condition and to keen the planted areas neat, edged and attractive. All trees and shrubs shall be pinched and pruned as necessary to encourage new growth and to eliminate rank sucker growth. Old wilted fla+ers an3 dead foliage shall be immediately pinched or cut off. Do no major tree pruning without Proper approval of the City. 3. After planting and during the maintenance period, in the event that trees e>atibit iron chlarosis sympbans, apply FE 138 Geigy or equivalent at manufacturer's reoanmended rates. 4. During the maintenance period, should the appeazanoe of any plant , indicate weakness, that plant shall be replaced im~riediately with a new healthy plant. At the end of the maintenance period, all plant materials shall be in a healthy, growisxJ coalition and spaced as irxiicated on the plans. 5. Iawns shall be rotary mowed at a l~s inch cut, minimum weekly. 1Yimming and edging shall be donE in "now" days. 6. Damage to planting areas shall. be repaired immediately and throughout the maintenance period. 7. Any Planting areas that do not show a prompt establishment of plant material shall be replanted at 10-day intervals until accepted by the City's representative. 8. Miscellaneous Maintenance hens: A. Depressions caused by vehicles, bicycles or foot traffic shall be filled and leveled. Replant damaged areas. B. ~*P*n+;*+ate gophers. squisYels and moles, and repair damage as above. C. 'lt~e postpl.ant fertilizing will oonsi.st primarily of a nitrogen wily fertilizer prograa. Beginniux3 approucimately 30 days after planting, ammonium sulfate shall be applied at the rate of 5 pounds per 1,000 square feet ari a monthly basis. D. Irrigati,ar: shall considers soil, exposure, day and night ten~era- tures and sprinkler output. Consesvati~ of water is a must. 9. Debris and trash shall be re~mved from the site weekly at a mininam. 10. Zhroughout the maintenance peri.ad, all plants shall be maintained in a disease and pest free oandition. A licence pest control operator shall be reatined by the contractor to apply all pesticides. Pesticide recam~endations shall be nude by a licensed pest control advisor. . .., ; C. Zed of Maintenanoe® 1. On completion of the one (1) year (365 days) maintenance period the City's representative will inspect the project. Notify the ' City's representative 24 hours prior th said inspection. ltie contractor and/or designee shall be present during inspection. 2. Confianation that the City has received all submittals and turn- over items shall be made. 3. Deficiencies noted during the in.~pection shall exte~ the maintenance period until all are corrected. 4. City's representative shall be the sole deciding party regaztling all end of maintenance items. 5. F2sd of maintenance period shall. occur only on written acceptance by the City. Said letter shall be on file in the Parks, Recreation , and Camunity Services Depart~.nt. 6. ~e Parks Division shall notify the ~gineeri~ DeparUmnt/Subdivision in writing of said a~eptance of project for bond/cash release. i api3 m ~Z~ ~dq~Q~ ~ +'/~ wPr 2 ti 6 `3 n ~p v 'd^ ~ ft9 L ~ • n ?Y I~ C e bE o ~~y'E ~'+ s~id3 > ih ~ :~•7 ~ ~~F.< ~ p~ a :F$ ~ ~ x i~s~~4v r°i ~'s ~~g'd~R~_~~ ,~ l~. ~ a^~ ~ .R ~ Y~R4 g Y qR a s~a - n 'g4W4W Z 4~ ~R<a~ ~~.r e ~ ~ _ _ q D a~4~v QQ X a ~ Z ~L~~~ s'e ~~Ps 3 r <" a : i Rs Rn It ~ D 4 e~ S n ~' ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ , ~ -tg - AG OLI~ A1VE~U ~ ~ --- /r N o .-, ; _ ' 7 ,i ~ ~ -~ I . n 1 1 ~ s~ ° ~ ~D i '< P t y • _ A N F '~ -.- 1 i , ~s r a ~ [T7 ° ~ z eC2Z~ei..e` E , n R ~ y1Q10002~o i . s ~ 1'IN222m 9'1'1 y N ~<~g°~_ y 1 Ol'f0 "='S ~ ~ Y >' O y.. " ~ T 1~~ L2. R~~ - 3 alb` $o K ~ "~ 5 ~ r ~ e y ~ _ ' ~ r _ J.~Ir. R . ~I a~t~~+t s _ i-t i i ~ 1 i P ems' ¦¦i W . ~~- . ~ , 1 v~ j!Xiq}~~Z["j+1Z .~C Sys ^Z r 1~~~~~~; F 1 i` Exhibit 3 CITY OF SAI~'~~RNARDINO - ~'..cMORANDUM To Planning Commission .From Al Bdughey, Director Planning & Building Svr Subject Tentative Tract No. 15228 Date February 14, 1992 Approved Item No. 1 Date March 3, 1992 BACKGROUND The above referenced application was heard by the Planning Commission on November 19, 1991. The hearing was continued to December 10, 1991 so that a representative from the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department could be present to answer questions regarding drainage issues, the proposed street design, and policies and procedures for the filing of final maps. At the Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1991, a quorum of the Planning Commissioners who originally heard the item on November 19, 1991 was not present, and the item was continued to January 7, 1992. At the Planning Commission meeting of January 7, 1992, the Planning Commission continued the item to March 3, 1992 at the request of the Director of Planning & Building Services. The purpose of the continuance request was to allow the applicant to make a final attempt to negotiate for an off-site drainage easement through the neighboring property to the east prior to approval of the tentative map. The owners of neighboring property are still unwilling to grant the easement, so conditions of approval will require that the developer obtain the easement prior to recordation of the final map (see Standard Requirement No. 18, Attachment D). Pursuant to Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, if the subdivider is unable to obtain the drainage easement by the time that the final map is filed, the City will be compelled to acquire the easement through eminent domain. In turn, the City shall require the subdivider to pay the cost of acquiring the easement. Enclosure: Staff report and attachments 7 C•r= _ Y.. j._. . ~-~•' -'~'~ ' Exhibit 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA'ITEM 3 SUMMARY HEARING DATE 11-19-91 WARD 5 APPLICANT: James STancl i ff William Hauser W 744 Creekland Circle a TEi~TATIVE TRACT h0. 15228 owNER: San Jose, CA 95133-1545 V SAFiE ~ The applicant request to create an 18-lot single family subdivision with a N ninimum parcel size of 10,800 square feet. W Q Subject property consists of 5.71 acres located at the southeast corner of W Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue in the RL, Residential Loly, General Plan land use district. Q W ft Q EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY t eN_n Lls_c_ DESIGNATION Subject Vacant RL Residential Low tlorth Vacant RL' Residential Low South Single Family Residential P.L Residential Low East Vacant P.L P,esidnetial Low Mast Vacant RL Residential Low GEOLOGIC /SEISMIC ? YES Fl OOD HAZARD ? YES ? ZOtiE A SEWERS: ? YES HAZARD ZONE: ? NO ZONE: ~ NO ? ZONE B $] NO HIGH FIRE ? YES AIRPORT NOISE/ ? YES REDEVELOPMENT ~ YES HAZARD ZONE: ~ NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA: ~I NO ~ NO Q ~ NOT ~ POTENTIAL SIGNIFlCANT Z Q$ AppROVAL APPLICABLE EFFECTS MATH O ~ MITIGATING MEASURES ~ Z N NO EI.R. Q ~ CONDITIONS ~ Z ~ EXEMPT ~ EI.R REQUIRED BUT NO IWL Z ~ DENIAL Z ~ SIGNIFlCANT EFFECTS Q W WITH MITIGATING f' ~ Q ~ MEASURES N C ? CONTINUANCE TO 2 ®NO SIGNIFlCANT ~ SIGNIFlCANT EFFECTS V W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. W MINUTES ~ Sri: nc PLA119A2 VASE 1 OF 1 N->bl ~ Imilirill~l/MM~~11~11 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE PAGE REQUEST Pursuant to Development Code Section 19.66.070, the applicants request approval of Tentative Tract No. 15228, to establish 18 single-family lots in an area that is designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. SITE LOCATION The subject property is a rectangular parcel consisting of approximately 5.7 acres located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Ohio Avenues (Please see Attachment F, Tentative Map and Attachment G, Location Map). DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY Tentative Tract No. 15228 is consistent with the standards and guidelines of the Development Code and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan, as shown in Attachment A. SUBDIVISION MAP ACT Tentative Tract No. 15228 was submitted in compliance with Section 66426 of the Subdivision Map Act. The subdivider has agreed to comply with the provisions imposed by the City under the authority of Chapter 4 of the Map Act. CEOA STATUS An Initial Study was prepared by Staff and presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 26, 1991. The ERC determined that no significant impacts would result from the project and recommended a Negative Declaration. The proposed Negative Declaration was advertised and available for public review and comment from October 3, 1991 to October 23, 1991. As of this writing, no comments have been received from the public. BACKGROUND The application for Tentative Tract No. 15228 was submitted on February 19, 1991. The application was deemed incomplete on March 18, 1991 pending the submittal of an arborist report, a biological report and an archaeological review fee. On May 22, 1991, all of the requested information was received and the application was deemed complete on June 18, 1991. vW.aene PAGE1OFt pJ701 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE - - PAGE ANALYSIS Sits Charaatariatics The 5.71 acre site is located within the boundaries of the Verdemont area. The property slopes slightly Prom north to south at an approximate natural grade of 8.5&. A row of eucalyptus trees is located adjacent to the north property frontage along Ohio Avenue and a row of olive trees is located to adjacent to the Magnolia Avenue frontage on the west. The surrounding area is characterized by vacant residential properties Project Characteristics Lot Design The proposed 18 lots range in size from 10,800 square feet to 12,250 square feet. The design of the lots are essentially rectangular in shape. The southward natural gradation of the property has resulted in the southern tract boundary to be located at the toe of a slope. The presence of a downward slope within a rear yard, depending on the steepness. may lead to maintence and usability problems. The elimination of the slope would require the construction of a 10- foot retaining wall facing the exterior of the tract, which could be visually imposing and obstruct scenic views currently enjoyed by adjacent properties. Based on the circumstances, it is Staff's recommendation that a maximum 3:1 slope be allowed, which would reduce maintenance problems and eliminate the need for a retaining wall. Access and Circu~at+on Access to all parcels will be from Magnolia Avenue by means of a new 767-foot street which will terminate at a temporary cul-de- sac. The intent of the temporary turnaround is to allow the subdivider to maximize the number of lots while facilitating the future extension of the street if the adjacent parcel to the east is ever developed. a ,...e..~ ~^"^M°d1°~ PuN.yy9 PAGE f OF 1 N+7% CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REM OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 3 Section 19.30.200(6) of the Development Code requires a tentative tract map to provide for at least two different standard routes for ingress and egress. A standard route is a road which is dedicated to the City and has a minimum paved width of 24 feet. The two standard means of access for the subject property shall be provided by Magnolia and Ohio Avenues. As a condition of approval, the subdivider shall be required to improve Magnolia and Ohio so that they become standard routes; that is, they shall be required to be widened and paved from the tract entry to the point where they tie into a standard street system. 8etrera aad Draiaage The site is currently isolated from development, and sewer service does not reach the subject property. The nearest sewer line is located in Chestnut Avenue, and terminates south of Belmont Avenue --approximately 1,200 feet south of the subject property. The sewer cannot be extended north along Chestnut due to a large dip in Belmont. Hence, until contiguous development reaches the adjoinq parcels, the only way to provide sewer service to this subdivision would be through securing an easement from the adjoining property to the south or east. Additionally, the property drains to the east and a drainage easement will be required. At this time, the property owners to the east are not willing to negotiate for easement rights. Therefore, conditions of approval shall make final recordation of the map contingent upon the acquisition of an easement for sewer and drainage purposes from the easterly terminus of the subject property southerly to Belmont Avenue. The easement shall be 15 feet wide. Sewer and drainage improvements shall be installed in the easement to serve the development as approved by the City Engineer. Additional sewer and/or drainage improvements may be required to reach an adequate outlet. Traffic Impacts The City Traffic Engineer has determined that additional trips from the proposed project are not sufficient to cause a significant impact on the adjacent street system. Total traffic volume will be less than the street design capacity. However, a traffic systems fee, estimated in the amount of S2,383 shall be collected prior to the final recordation of the map. a~.ndw y~ ~ P~AN.IpB P110E 1 OF t µ+70( CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 11-I9-91 PAGE 4 Biological Resources (ezcludinq trees) The site is located within the Biological Resources Management Overlay (BRMO), as identified in Section 10, Figure 41, Resources of the City's General Plan. A biological assessment was conducted by John Wear and Timothy J. Wade of the Lilburn Corporation on April 19, 1991. The consultants concluded that no significant biological resources occur on the site; thus, no mitigation was recommended. Trees on site There are currently 48 standing trees on the subject property, primarily consisting of a wind row of 34 eucalyptus trees along Ohio Avenue and a row of 13 olive trees adjacent to Magnolia Avenue. The subdivision has been designed to preserve these trees as much as possible; however, construction of the new street (Blackhawk Road) and right-of-way dedications will displace several of the olive trees. A California Certified Arborist report was prepared on April 26, 1991 by James F. Bridges (I.S.A. Certificate No. 386). The trees were identified and catalogued in the report and plotted on a map, which is on file with the Planning Division. The report concluded that only 14 of the 48 trees were sufficiently viable to be saved in place or transplanted. The report identified the remaining trees as diseased or dead and recommended their removal. The report and recommendations have been reviewed by Planning and Parks and Recreation staff. Additionally, Parks and Recreation staff physically inspected the trees on site and concluded that of the trees on site are sufficiently viable to be retained in place, relocated or replaced. Based upon these analyses, if the project is approved, Staff recommends the following mitigation measures: 1. All trees not affected by construction shall be retained in place; and 2. All trees affected by construction shall be transplanted or replaced with 36-inch box native trees at a two-to-one replacement ratio. These trees shall be planted on-site or on public lands in accordance with the recommendations and requirements oP the Parks and Recreation Department. ~~p~ PLAN-aAB PKaE 1 Of 1 (a.90) a!nr~ rrvwirrrwr _ a CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE n 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 5 Enforcement of these mitigation measures shall be accomplished through the Tree Removal Permit process established by the City. Cultural Resources The subject property is located within an area of concern for archaeological resources, as identified in the Historical Element of the City's General Plan (Section 3.0, Figure 8). A preliminary cultural resources review was conducted by Lester Ross, coordinator at the Archaeological Information Center of the San Bernardino County Museum. Mr. Ross determined that the potential for the presence of cultural resources within the project area is low. As a result of the negative findings, a field reconnaisance for cultural resources was not undertaken. COMMENTS RECEIVED Area Residents No comments have been received as of the writing of this staff report. councilman Tom xinor (ward s) In comments submitted to Staff, Councilman Minor stated that his support is strictly contingent upon the project making adequate provisions for infrastructure. It is the opinion of Staff that the conditions of approval and standard requirements fully address these issues. sac Beraardino IInilied school District The project will be subject to school impact fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Qnited states Postal service The Postal Service requests that the final map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. A condition of approval has been proposed for the inclusion of such easements. The specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the Postal Service and Public Works Department. yN ~ PWI.BLB PAGE 1 OF 1 MAUI CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REM 3 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 6 CONCLUSION Tentative Tract No. 15228 complies with all of the development standards of the Development Code and is consistent with the General Plan. Tentative Tract No. 15228 is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act. To address potential environmental impacts and infrastructure deficiencies, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and conditions of approval. It is the conclusion of Staff that, based upon the project design and proposed conditions of approval, the project will not pose a detriment to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration; and 2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 15228 based upon the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment B), and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attacheent D). Respectfull submitted, ~i n N' Al Boughey, AICP Director of Planning and Building Services Gregory S. Gubman Assistant Planner Attachments: A - Development Code and General Plan Consistency B - Findings of Fact C - Conditions of Approval D - Standard Requirements E - Initial Study F - Tentative Tract Map G - Location Map P{µiAB PAGE 1 OF 1 n i i H~nritn 1 „ ' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE - - PAGE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY Development Category Proposal Code General Plan IIse Single- family homes Permitted Permitted Min. Lot 10,800 sq. 10,800 sq. 10,800 sq. Size ft. ft. ft. No. of Lots 18 18 max. 18 max. Min. Lot 80 ft. 80 ft. N/A Width Min. Corner 88 ft. 88 ft. N/A Lot width Min. Lot 135 ft. 100 ft. N/A Depth Frontage All Lots All Lots N/A on Dedicated Streets Standard Two: Maq- Two min. N/A Means of nolia and Access and Ohio ~~.nu°~rwnwaa~°Ow.ns PW~4BDB PAfiE I OF t µJ701 ATTACHMtNT B y CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM FINDINGS OF FACT HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 8 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, in that the purpose of the map is to provide for the development of single-Family homes at a density of 3.1 dwelling units per acre, as permitted within the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use district. 2. The design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan in that the minimum proposed lot size is 10,800 square feet, as required in the RL land use district. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, in that the tentative map conforms to the subdivision design standards of the Development Code, the proposed street complies with the minimum standards of the Public Works Department, the two routes of access can be improved to meet City standards and water and sewer service can be accomplished through the acquisition of easement rights through adjacent properties. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the subdivision design complies with all lot area and dimensional standards, as well as required public improvements standards. 5. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, in that mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and conditions of approval to protect, relocate and replace the existing trees on site. 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that environmental health concerns are addressed and mitigated through the design and construction standards of all public services and public and private structures. 7. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, in that no such easements traverse the subject property. vwae.as v,~ne , of i aAm nlln~nrluvl ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 9 1. No tree shall be removed, replaced or relocated prior to the issuance of a Tree Removal Permit. The removal, replacement or relocation of any tree shall be subject to the provisions established by the mitigation measures contained in the Initial Study for Tentative Tract No. 15228. 2. Downward facing slopes abutting the southerly subdivision boundary shall not exceed 3:1. Perimeter walls or fences shall be located at the bottom of said slopes, abutting the subdivision boundary. 3. Walls and Fences: a. The perimeter walls adjacent to Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue shall be constructed of either slumpstone, split- taced block or stuccoed block with decorative caps. The walls shall have articulated planes, by providing at a minimum for every 100 fast of continuous wall, an 18- inch deep by 8-foot long landscaped recession. Pilasters shall be provided at every change in direction, every 5- foot difference in elevation and at a minimum of every 25 feet of continuous wall. b. All wood fences used within the tract shall be treated with heavy body stains or paints. 4. The final map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. Specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the U.S.P.S., the Public Works Department and the Planning Division. 5. Building permits and utility clearances shall be issued in full compliance with Resolution No. 89-116, Resolution No. 90-02 and Ordinance No. MC-690. 6. No home shall be constructed, or building permit issued, without formal design review and approval of a Development Permit by the review bodies empowered by the City to approve or deny Development Permits for 18-unit single-family residential developments. PW/.~p PKiE 1 OF 1 149p) ~ nu ¦N~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENOA.ITEM 3 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE - PAGE Construction shall be in suhstantial conformance with the Dlan~s~ aDOroved by the Director. Development Review Committee. Planning Commission or Mayor and Common Council. Minor modification to the olan(sl shall be subject to approval by the Director through a minor modification permit process. Anv modification which exceeds IUZ of the folloxing allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if aDPlicable. 1. On-site circulation and parking. loading and landscaping; 2. Placement and/or height of walls. fences and structures: 3. Reconfiguration of architectural features. including colors. and/or ¦odification of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme: and. 4. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project. Aithin one year of development aDProval. commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition. if after commencement of construction. work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the permit/aporoval shall become null and void. Projects say be built in phases if preapproved by the review authority. If a project is built in preapproved phases. each subsequent phase shall have one year from the previons phase's date of construction cosnencesent to the next phase's date of construction commencement to have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. Project:------------------------------------------ Expiration Date:________________________________ Page 1 of 7 A CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA1TEM 3 CONDfTtONS HEARING DATE ' " PAGE 8• The review authority nay, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and far good cause. grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review authority shall ensure that the project coaplies with all current Developaent Code provisions. g• In the event that this approval is legally challenged. the City will Dromptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully is the defense of the natter. Once notified. the applicant agrees to defend, indeanifv. and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees fro¦ any claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reiaburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City aav be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. No vacant, relocated. altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use of land or structure~s~ shall be inaugurated. or no new business consented as authorized by this persit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Departaent. A teaporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Departaent subject to the conditions iaposed on the use. provided that a deposit is filed with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The deposit or. security shall guarantee the faithful performance and coapletion of all terse. conditions and performance standards iaposed on the intended use by tfiia persit. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the landowner shall file a maintenance agreesent or covenant and easement to enter and aaintain. subject to tfie approval of the City Attorney. The agreesent or covenant and easement to enter and ¦aintain shall ensure that if the landowner. or subsequent owners), fails to ¦aintain the required/installed site iaDrovenents. khe City wilt be able to file an appropriate lien(s> against the property in order to accosolish the required maintenance. ~." ~ w~w+ao vws~oo+ p.oai Yage ~ of 7' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 12 10.___ This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the followinY Cit~• Departments or Divisions: ___X___ _ Fire Department X Parka. Recreation & Cosmunity Services Department Building Services Division of the Plannins and Building Services Department Police Department Public Services Refuse) Department ___X______ Public Korka IEnIIineering) Departsent ___X______ Water Department nwwao na¢,ov, paq Page 4 of 7 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT gGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE - - PAGE ____11____ This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the tine of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property Development Standards. and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and YradinY activities; emission control of fuses. vapors. ;axes and other forms of air pollution; Ylare control; exterior liYhtinY desiYn and control; noise control; odor control; acreeninY; siYns, off-street parkinY and off-street loadinY; and. vibration control. Screening and siYn reYUlations compliance are important considerations to the developer because they xill delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior structural equipment. or utility transformers. boxes, ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by xall or structural element. blendinY with the buildinY desiYn and include landscapinY when on the Yround. A siYn proYra¦ for all nex commercial. office and industrial centers of three or more tenant spaces shall be approved Dy the Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This requirement also includes any applicable Land Use District Development Standards for residential. commercial and industrial developments reYardinY minimum lot area. minimum lot depth sad width. sinimum setbacks. maximum heiYht. maximum Lot coveraYe. etc. This development shall he required to maintain a • sinimum of standard off-street oarkinY spaces as shown on the approved plan~s> on file. $w".r°.w~... PIAKw vAGF ~ OF t ~~1 Pace 5 of 7 A CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING ¢ASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDAiTEM CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 14 ___12____ A Composite Development Plan ICDPI shall be filed with the Public works and Planning and Building Services Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processing by the City. The CDP shall provide additional survey and nap information including, but not limited to, building criteria (i.e. setbacks), flood control criteria, seismic and geological criteria, environmental criteria and easements of record. The CDP shall be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan". and contain a section entitled "CDP Notes" The applicant shall have listed under the CDP notes section the following conditions or mitigating measures required for the development of the subject property: ____13_N Within two years of this approval, the filing of the final sap or parcel ¦aD with the Council shall have occurred or the aDProval shall become null and void. Expiration of a tentative sap shall terminate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map shall be filed without first processing a new tentative map. The City Engineer moat accept the final map or parcel map documents as adequate for approval by Council prior to forwarding them to the City Clerk. The date the nap shall be deemed filed with the Council is the date on which the City Clerk receives the map. The review authority say, uDOn application filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause. grant an extension to the expiration date pursuant to Section 19.66.170 of the Development Code and the State Map Act. Project:___ Tentative Tract No. 15228 Expiration Date: November 19, 1993 PIIWddi PIaE t OF 1 (µp) Page 6 of 7 CITY OF SAN RNARDINO PUBLI rUORKS/ENOR. ~E TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTSAGENDA ITEM NEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAG NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the app scant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainage and Flood Control All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer, which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. 1. A local drainage study mill be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to miti- gate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right- of-way dedicated as necessary. The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. is rain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclu- sively show that the drain is not needed to protect your develop- ment or mitigate downstream impacts. 2. ~ All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drain age facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfac- tion of the City Engineer. 3. Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge. suffi- ciently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit requirements. Erosion Control i. An Erosion Control Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to grading plan approval. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. ['~ CITY OF SAh BERNARDINO FIJBLh. WORKS/ENOR, ~E TR 15228 • STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE ~~- PAGE ~- Gradin 5, X If more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. 6. X If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. 7, X An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is proposed to cross lot lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines. g, X The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. g, X A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain landscaping within the following areas: Parkway area and landscape easement along the South side of Ohio Avenue. 10. X Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided for the Landscape Maintenance District. CITY OF SA~Q 3ERNARDINO PUBIQ WORKa/EMOR. CASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM . HEARING DATE Utilities' 11. Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City code, City Standard and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV. 12, Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer faci- lities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. 13. Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be con- structed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. 14. X Utility services shall be placed underground and easements pro- vided as required. 15. X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in actor dance with Section 19.20.030 (non-subdivisions) or 19.30.110 (subdivisions) of the Development Code. 16. X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A privata sewer plan designed Dy the Developer's Engin- eer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where practical. 17. A "communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets with- in and adjacent to this project. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernar- dino. 18. X An easement for sewer and drainage purposes shall be acquired from the Easterly terminus of Blackhawk Road Southerly to Belmont Avenue. The easement shall be at least 15' wide. Sewer and drainage improvements shall be installed in the easement to serve the development as approved by the City Engineer. Additional sewer and/or drainage improvements may be required to reach an adequate outlet. CITY OF SA~OBERNARDINO PUBL~ WORKa/EMQR. ~E TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE ' PAGE ~- Ma in 19. X A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. 20. X All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. 21. X Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and set- backs, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-592. Improvement Completions 22. X Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire pro- ject shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. 23. X If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Final/Parcel Map. an improvement security accom- panied by agreement executed by the developer and the City will be required. If the required improvements are not proposed to be completed prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, a deferred improvement agreement in accordance with Section 19.30.160 of the Development Code will be required. If the agreement is approved, an improvement certificate shall be placed on the Parcel Map stating that the required improvements will be completed upon develop- ment. Applicable to Parcel Maps consisting of 4 or less parcels only. 24. X Street light energy fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. 25. X All rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from the following streets: Ohio Avenue qTY OF SAl~4ERNARDINO PU6LIs WORKa/EMOA, ,A$g TR 15~9A STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ,AGENDA ITEM 3 NEARING DATE ~1-1_, 9~ . PAG Street Improvement and Dedications: 26. X A11 public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. A11 design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 27. X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-May (Ft.) Curb Line (Ft.) Ohio Avenue 30' 2p' Magnolia Avenue 32' lg' Blackhawk Road 30' lg' 28 X A temporary turn-around shall be constructed at the Easterly terminus of Blackhawk Road. c 29. X Curb return radius shall be 25'. 30. X Construct handicap ramp per Std. No. 205 at Southeasterly ccrner of, Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue, and on both corners of they intersection of Blackhawk ;load and Magnolia Avenue. 31. X Two means of access to this subdivision shall be provided { conforming to Section 19.30.200 of the Development Code. Each ~ access shall be at least 24' wide paved and dedicated unless parking is allowed, in which case the access shall be at least 28' paved width. Additional dedicated width may be required for drainage control. qTY OF SAS ~ BERNARDiNO PUBL. ~ WORKs/ENOR, - ~E TR 15228 . STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE ~T PAG Required Engineering Permits: 32. X Grading permit (if applicable.). 33. X On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), includes landscaping. 34, X Off-site improvements construction permit. ~plicable Engineering Fees (Fees subject to change without notice) 35. X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map - 31,000.00 plus E30.00 per lot ar parcel. 36. X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 3% and 2.5%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of off-site improvements. 37, X Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 1% and 1%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of on-site improvements, including landscaping. 38, X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required) - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. 39. X Drainage fee in the amount of 50.113/SF 52,205.48/Lot Max. 40, X Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of 5132.40/House Exact amount shall be determined by the City Tra is ngineer at time of application for Building Permit. 41. X Sewer connection fee in the amount-. of 5235.43/Bedroom 42. X Sewer inspection fee 515.84 per connection *Estimated construction cast is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engineer. © ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. CASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 3 N EARIN6 DATE i1-19=91 PAGE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS - VERDEMONT AREA PROJECTS 43. X This development will be required to pay Infrastructure Development Fees prior to issuance of building permits in the amount of 56,976.00 per single family residence. 44. X This single family residential project lies within the Chestnut Storm Drain Fee boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of 50.133 per square foot shall be paid'(not to exceed 52,050.00 per tot) to the City prior to approval of building permits. This commercial, industrial, or multiple residential project lies within the Chestnut Storm Drain Fee boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of 50.138 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of building area, paving or other impervious area, and 50.046 per square foot in excess of 3,000 square feet. shall be paid to the City prior to approval of building permits. 45. X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Traffic Signal Fee area; therefore, a fee as approved by the Mayor and Common Council shall be paid to the City prior to approval of building permits. 46. X A 10' wide easement for landscape purposes shall be dedicated to the City along the South side of Ohio Avenue. the easement and parkway area shall be landscaped, including trees of a size, spacing and type suitable to the Department of Parks and Recreation as replacements for th existing trees being removed. ( The easement parkway area shall be maintained by a landscape maintenance district. CITY OF SA~OBERNARDINO PURL WORKS 522EMGR. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE~~ PAG ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS - GENERAL 47. X A landscape maintenance easement shall be dedicated over the setback areas of each lot adjacent to public streets and a landscape maintenance district formed over these areas to maintain the landscaping in case of owner neglect. 48. X If this project is approved after December 1, 1991, it may be subject to requirements of the State mandated Congestion Management Program (CMP). Under the CMP, new projects which are heavy traffic generators will be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) addressing impacts from the site, and requiring mitigations. Threshold levels at which projects will be required to prepare a TIA have not been finalized. Status information and details of the CMP can be obtained from the City Traffic Engineer at 384-5213. O " CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CASE ~rzz ~' HEARING DATE .T~' 'STANDARD REQUIREMENTS REVIEWED BY PIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS GENERAL REQCIRE\tENTS: f 1 Provide one extra set o[ construction plans to Building and Safety for F(re Depsrtmant use at time of plan check. 49 ( 1 Contact Fire Department [or specific or detailed requirements -IMPORTANT. The developer shall provide [or adequate Fire Flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Fire Flow shall be based on square Cao[age, construction features and exposure information as supplied Dy the developer and may De taken from two hvdrants. ACCESS: I I Provide two different routes o[ ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shell be paved, all-weather. [ ] Provide an access roadway to esch buildin¢ for [ire apparat•~s. access roadway shall have an aLL-weather driving surface of not less than ?0-feet of unaDStructed width. 1 Extend roadway to within 150-feet o[ all portions of the exterior vaLLs of sE single-story buildings. [ ] Extend roadway to within 50-feet of Me exterior walls of W muL'iple-story builditgs. ( ] Provide "No PARKING" signs whenever perking o[ vehicles woWd possibly reduce the clearance o[ access roadways to less than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" (All caps). "SI.C. Sec. 15.18". [ ] Deatl-end streets shall not exceed 500-feet in length end shall hsve a minimum ~5-foot radius turnaround. 5~. ~ The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Firc Department for approval. 5lTE: I 1 All access roads sod sweets are to be constructed and usable prior to rnmbusttble contraction. ( ] Private fire hydrants shW be irotaAed to protect each DuAditg lotutted more than 150-feet from Me curb IGN No fln hydrant should De wiMtn 10-feet of soy exterior waA. The hvdrants dull be Wet Rarrel type, witD one 2}finch and one A-incD outlet, and approved D,v the Firc Department. Fire hydrants arc to be protected from damage Dy providing sWteWa traffic Wrrian. The area aroutM the fin hydrant shall De designated as a "NO PARKING" sane by paiatitg an 0-inch wide, red stripe for IS-feet in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that tt will not be Godced by parked vehicles. Suita~e "NO PARKING" signs ere required 51. ~ Public fin hydrants shag De provided along streets at 100-feet intervals for commercisl eM multi-eesidentfal areas end et 500-feet intervals for residential areas. Installation shall conform to City speci[idtions and De instaAed prior to comburtible constnction or stooge. BUILDING: [ ] The address of the stracturc. in six inch numerals, shell De instaAed on the Winding or in other approved locstion to wch e manner as to De visible from the footage street The color of the numbers shaA eaatrast with color of the ttackgrourtd [ ] Identity each gas and ateMric meth wiM the number of the unit which it services. 1 Fire extinguisher must Oe instaLLed prior to the OWldittg being occupied The minimum rating for any fin eitiryfuisher is ?A IO B/C. }linimum distribution of frc a:tinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over TS-feet rove! distance from a tin extinguisher. I 1 all buildings, other tram residential over 5,000 square feet shall be provided with an automatic tlrc sprinkler system, Designed to NFPA standards. ( ] Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to begitmin6 construction an the system. [ 1 Tenant improvements in ell sprinklered buildings en to be ebprovM by the Firc Department prior to cotistructioa [ 1 Protnde an automatic fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must De approved by the Firc Department. prior to instaLLetioa [ ] Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shell be required at eacD line. a:sv.cecevv.eeseexas ==oar-.-r------s:ae:e:-r_xve:- ~~e NOTE: The applicant must request. in writing, any change in these other rcquinments. ADDITIONAL INFOR}fAT[ON: =P8 170 7;09 .G ~JL /.e} ©an Bsrnardioo City Watsr Dapartm~. " STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ' Review of Plans: # Tr. A15228 Date: Location: S.E. cor. of Magnolia & Ohio Aves. Approved: Type of Construction: To subdivide acres into 18 single resid. lots. Denied: Owner/Developer. Continued: ENGINEERING: Name:~5, L.'// L114~15 Date: 52. P.S.I. `-+ -Mo f.'S'/ 53. Size of Main Adjacent to the Project 1t1st7F~ ~9irl s~2 .~l,f/~~~% 54. 2Z Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. 55 • '$ Off-site Water Facilities R,eq+uired to Meet Peak Flow Demand. 56. ~' Comments: A ~ M4~ u ~C.T= L1~-~t3t~ ~E~sZ71F3~?~ t r1 ~%N~10 JDI.~~ Subject to the Rules&RegulationsoftheWaterDepartmentineffectatthetimeofApplicationforWaterService. This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees/Conditions will be Determined by their Engineering Department. WATER OUALtTY CONTROL OEPARTIYIENT: Name:~~.,r/~~ C~ Date: 9 • ~6 ' 9/ = R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. Air Gap Required at Service Connection. No Backflow Device Required. ""~~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name: ~ 64'+'i4~ ~A?~.tl Date: '-25 "~/ _ Industrial Waste Permit Required by Environmental Control Officer. Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer. = Pre-treatment Required by Environmental Control Officer. = No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed Without Prior Approval. Approved by Environmental Control Offieer. JJ SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: /.k~7L ~>/'/~'?~1 Date: ~5 ' ~j~ = No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. 57, ~iSewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the City Water Department forthe Amount of ~.Of-.?i Gallons Per Day. Equivalent Dwelling Units: Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. 58• RProofofPaymentMustbeSubmittedtotheBuilding&SafetyDepartmentPriortolssuanceoftheBuildingPermit. Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: .zie ~3~w~ ww7Raa ':":u"..: ~.u""v.'"0"DUa ~'. '• ~ n~T 1522$ ciTr a~ saN HnaO DEPAti~ffNPS ~ PAIaCB, RR(gtE'ATICN AbID CONMDl1TY SIIt~TlCFS pl,AtaIING DEPAR'IIgNf ' PPOC~IRE AND PCII+IQ! FOR ~1p6Q?PII4G AND IRRIGATIQJ - ASSES3~S1T DISTRICPS JANUAia[, 1988 '. A.ssFSSruxr©~~'Ricrs - »Iaa z rANOSCa~ ~arma~rns zluucASloN . 1. Separate water meter for the irrigation shall be required. 2. Separate electric meter for the irrigation controllers shall be required. 3. Valoon~I M.P.C. oontmllers, with water miser feature, shall be used. Said ooaitrollers shall be enclosed in a "Ia Mex" enclosure fnrn~ the Valaon ~?Y. 4. "Fain Gard" units fmrt the Hydro Visor Company shall be installed dt each controller. 5. Valoon Hi-Flan series, reacts control valves, in angle pattern shall be used. ' 6. All irrigation sprinkler in planter areas and snal.l turf areas shall be Rain Bird 1600 series with M.P.R., 8-12 nozzles (Q-H-F). 7. All irrigation sprinklers in medium areas shall be 7bro, Super 700 C. 8. All irrigation sprinklers in .large turf areas shall be Zl~son heads with zvlaber covers. 9. All sprinklers used shall be "pop-up" type. . 10. All irrigation sprinklers shall be on triple swing joints. 11. All pipe 2" and larger shall be class 3I5 P.V.C., all pipe 1~" and smaller shall be P.V.C. soh. 40. 12. Rain Bird 3/4" quids ooupl.Pr valves shall be installed every 100' in zrnu~d plastic valve boxes. 7.A6IDSCAPE 1. Specific information on street trees and plant material will depend on Project location. Contact City Parks Division for further information. 2. Mini:nm pant sizes shall be as follows: 7Y+ees: A. Open recreation arses - 24" box B. Street trees -All 24" box Shrubs: . A. Even combination of 15 gallon and 5 galla~n sizes ~ 3lirfgrass: A. Setback areas shall be sod B. Open recreation areas shall be hydroseeded © Q A. Intent shall be total coverage at maturity ' MORE; Intent and puapose of said plant sizes are to oomglete a dense and mature appearing landscape. 3. A oanpleYx soil test with reoamw~dations shall be required. SanQle results and reoonmerdati.ons shall be on the landscape plans and shall be adhered to. RYn^ee (3) copies of said sample reports shall be provided with the final landscape plans. 4. Setback areas shall be bernied not to exceed 3:1 slope. Said beaming shall be o~tinuws in shape a~ foam. 5. Planter areas shall be a minimimt of four feet (4') wide. 6. concrete curbing shall enclose all planter areas. ' 7. 6" concrete mowstrips shall separate all turf areas fzan shrub areas. 8. 6" wncrete mowstrips shall separate assessment district fmn private la~scaping. ORSiER 1. Tl:e following infa~nnaticn shall be listed in the sheet index and shall be refeapnoed in the Plans on a separate sheet. A. City of San ~*^~~'+~ irrigation section for Assessment Districts. B. City of San Beaa~ardino Assessrent Districts l+liintenance Period. i !' AS,~.,t~'ffNP DISTRICTS - I9~11NifSANCE I" !W l94II~'PFS1A1Jf~ . All areas landscaped by the contractor under this project shall be maintained by him for a period of mt less than one (1) year fmn the date of written acceptance for start of maintenance, (365 days). A. Start of Maintenance Period 1. Maintenaz~ce period shall not start until all elements of the project are ca~leted in aocordanoe with the contract dxvmnts. Projects will not be segmented into phases. 2. Power to remote controllers shall be established prior to the beginning of the maintenance period. 3. 41ie maintenance period for the job sha12 not begin until after the first mowing of the turf area. New turf shall not be mowed until alto; a miniman height of l~s inches. Mow at lit inch height using a mtary mower equipped with a ProPps'lY a~,pe~ Notify the Parks Division representative 24 hours prior to this mowing, who wi21 make an inspectican. 4. Written aooeptanoe of the landscape architect and the City must be obtained prior to the beginning of the maintenance period. Said letters shall be given to the Parks Division and shall be on file. 5. If the pmject mairrtenanoe fails to ocntisnnously meet sta[dards required for start of maintenance. the maintenance period will be suspended and will not oontinaie until contractor has corrected all deficiencies. 6. Contractor shall post a bond or cash in the amamt agreed upon with the Fl~gineerirg Division/Slnbdivisions. Said monies are to guarantee the repair or replaoa~nt of any deficiencies in the irrigation, landscape and hard surfaces at the end of the one (2) year {365 days) maantenance period. 7. Contractor sha12 submit cxirQleted as-built draiwiigs w(sids shall be in the form of one (1) mylar repr+cducible and two (2) blue line copies. Actual submittal shall be made to the City's representative. Said drawings shall enoongaass all irrigation, landscape atd hard surfaces. 8. Parks Divisi~ representative shall be the sole deciding party, regarding all acroeptanoe items, far start of maintenance period. 8. During Maintenance Period 1. Contractor and/or designee shall contact City's representative an the first Monday of each month during the one (1) year (365 days) maintenance period. Contact shall be by telephone az other means if pre-arranged. Repose of contact is to review the status of the protect, bna+0 amnoe district portions an1yT It otall also be the responsibility of the oohttactor and/ar designee ~ leave a business address and telephone nimber with the City's representative. ' 2. During the maintenance period provide all watering, weeding, fertiliz- ing, cultivating and spraying necessary tv keep the plants and turf in a healthy growing cnrditiar and to keep the planted areas neat, edged and attractive. All trees and shrubs shall be pinched and pruned as necessary t+o encourage new growth and to eliminate rank sucker gsvwth. Old wilted flowers ant dead foliage shall be immediately pinched or cut off. Do no major tree pruning without proper approval of the City. 3. After planting and during the maintP~ance period, in the event that trees e~ibit iron chlorosis slmgta?~s, apply FE 138 Geigy or equivalent at manufacturer's reonmiended rates. 4. During the maintenance period, should the appearance of any plant ~ indicate weakness, that plant shall be replaced i~miediately with a new healthy plant. At the end of the maintenance period, all plant materials shall be in a healthy, growing wndition and spaced as indicated on the plans. 5. Lawns shall be rotary maed at a 1~ inch cut, mininnan weekly. Trimming aid edging shall be done ill 'ymow~ days. 5. Dan?age to planting areas shall be repaired i:miediately and tluoughout the maintenance period. 7. Any planting areas that do rot show a pranpt establishns+nt of plant msterial shall be replanted at 10-day intervals wail accepted by r the City's representative. B. MiscellaT~eotLS Maintenance hens: A. Depressions caused by vehicles, bicycles ar foot traffic shall be filled and leveled. Replant damaged areas. B. F~cteani.nate gophers, squirrels atd moles, and repair damage as above. C. 1l~e postplant fertilizing will oonsi.st primarily of a nitrogen only fertilizer pzogram. Beginning apprnocimately 30 days after planti~, ammonium sulfate shall be applied at the rate of 5 pounis per 1,000 square feet on a monthly basis. _ D. Irrigation shall oonsidere soil, exposure, day and night tempera- tures and sprinkler output. C«csesvation of Water is a must. 9, Debris and trash shall be removed from the site weekly at a miniman. 10. lhroughout the maintenance period, all plants shall be maintained in a disease and pest free oonditian. A licensed pest aontml operator ah~i21 be zeatined by the contractor to apply all pesticides. Pesticide recammrdations shall be made by a licensed pest o~tml advisor. Q ATTACHEMENT E O INITIAL STUDY FUR: Tentative Tract >fao 15?28 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: The subdivision of approximately ~.7 acres into IS single family residential lots. Located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Ohio Avenues. SEPTEMBER 18, 1991 PREPARED FOR: Eaviroasental RiAh Tech c/o Janes Stanclift 8 4illiam Bauser 3272 North °E" Street. Suite A San Bernardino. CA 92+95 PRBPARED BY: Edalia Olivo-Onmez associate Planner City of San Bernardino Planning DePartaent 30O V. "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92+18 . o 0 • Project Summary • This Initial Study Involves the subdivision of approximately 5.71 vacant acres into 18 single family residential lots. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Ohio avenues in the RL - Residential Low General Plan land use desiYnation. The subject site is relatively flat with natural slopes ranging up approximately 8.5X. a row of eucalyptus trees is located to the nor*_h along Ohio a:•enue and a row of olive trees is located to the wes~ along Magnolia avenue. The surrounding a-ea is characterized by ~•acant residential properties. . , ~ --~ ~ - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING. AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPART(NENT ' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND ApplieationNumber. Tentative Tract Mac 15228 ProjeaDeseriptbn• To subdivide 5.71 acres intc 18 single family residential lcts. Lomtbrt: southeast .corner o: Magnolia and Ohio Avenues. tt EnvironmentalConstraimsAreas: Biological Resources Management Overlay (BRM) High Wind; high Fire, Zone C; and Archeological Sensitive Area. General Plan Despnaticn: ~ - Residential Low ZarinpDesgnation: RL - Residenital Low B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, whero appropriate, on a separate a0adfed sheet 1. Earth Rewurdes VIfiB the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe - i Earth mowmerd (art arM/ar frT) of 10.000 cubic yards or more? 0. Developmen andhr gradirq an a sbpe gnaw / than 15% naaad grade? ~/ c Owebpmen within the Aquist-Priob Special Studies Zorn as defined in Seaiorr 120 - Geobgie / E Seismic, Fpwe 47, of the City's General Plan? V d. Modifiption of arty unigw geologic or physial roatwe? e. Owebpmem within areas defined for high potential for waur or wind eroabo as identified in Section 120 - Geobgb 6 SeiprriG Fgun 53. of the City's Gemnl plan? t. Moddigtion of a channel, seek or rivet! ~°~w°u~t~'~O°e° OrMFie~ PMatOF_ I1 t.00r © n as ~ of new or expanabn of existing industrial. Yes No Maybs • other uses whidr generate noise lewb on ng housing, xhoob. health care laeBRies - ~ :ive uses above an Ldn of tS d8(A) exterior / S d8(A) irrlergR V / ~ proposal result in: = ~-• • land use as desgnated on the _!L ~ Airport District as identified in th. Compatible Uae Zone (AICUZ) Report and ~ :Doing Distret Map1 ritftirr Fcarthifi Fn Zone A b 8, or C as / s Land tJse Zoning Diaries Map? V w0 the project: _-~ isport or dispose d hazardous or -~ ~ (indudrng but trot fim4ed to oil, miesb or radiation)? ~ d hazardous substances? _s~ to the paterrtlal heatltlaafely hazards? ~G ? waposat . / g housing or erean a demand rwtatlam Could tM proposal, in Cireuladon Plan as identified in Section re Citl/s General Plan, result in: . . •agic tttst is greater than the land- on 1M General Plan? / _ or demand for new. parldrg es? ~9 P~ ~ _ / :end paaems of dnadation? Y sir trafife7 hawrds ro vehicles, birydiats at en of roadway improwmems? _i~L-- in tnf<x: volumes an the roadways / n,w.sn v.os:a_ m+a owww .wsooc_ r+~-as . o 14. 1lattdateuy Flndtngs of slgnHkana (S`idion 15065) _ The Calilomia Erwironmental Cualily Ad atrrtu that if any d the following can be ansrwred yu ar maybe, tM projers may haw a sgndieara eBeet on the ernironmem and an Erwironmemal Impact Report shalt be prepared. Yu No Maybe a. you the project have the potental m degrade the quality d ~e environment substantially nduu the habitat d a fish or wddBh spedu. ewu a fish or wik: to population to drop below set sustaining Iwea. threaten to eliminate a plant or animal eommuniry, redtra the rwmbar or natriU the rangy d a rare or endargend pam or animal or Niminate important eisampas d 1M mapr periods d l,atifaoma history / ar pnhittory? ? b. Does the propel have tM potential m adtieve sfwrt- Urm. t0 the daadvamage d bng-term, emrironmemal goals? (A short-term impact on 1M ernironmem is one which occurs in a.relatiwy brat. defirritive period d time whr7e bng-term impacts wiG endure weq into tiffs futon.) . c Dou the project haw impacts which an individually fut+ked, but amwlativey considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate ruowces when 1M impact on udt resource a nlativay ama9, brrt when tM elhet d the total d theta impacts on the env6onmem a aigrdfieartt.) d Doa tits project haw ertviratmarital eMeets which wit etaaw substantial adwne eMeets an laartan beigs, either dingy or irtdGaetyT a t~sa~o~t t>R u evAwAnoN AND ro'ncAnoN e~nsuREs (Attach sheeK u naeuaary-) See Attached ~, ;,,,+r,:$ vwrm vusa soc,_ n,.oor o t0. Publle Servkes: Nrtn the proposal impact thi folbwbg Yes No Maybe beyond ttre capability to provide adequab lewb d servial a. Fn protection? ~/' b. PoYa protedbnl ~/ e. 3dtoob (l.e„ attendanu, boundaries. overbad, etc.)1 JL d. Pads or ether recreational faei6tiesl e. Medial aid? f. Solid Wasb1 an.n 11. tJtllltba: Win the proposaL• a. Impact the rolbwing beyond the apabnny b provide adequate levels d service or roquiro the eorotns:tion d new fadntiea7 1., Natural pas? 2 Eleariatyl ' 3. WrteR 4. Sewell ~ OtltM b. Recall h a drspinted pattern d rrtlily estemiorrs7 ~ c Require the mnstruetion d newfaal>Ws1 12 Aeatlretles: a. ~~1hN~pmposal result in tM abstrrsdion d any Q b the visual ~?the project be detrimerrbl _ - sunoundirg c OtMr1 tl Qrttural Resources: Could the propad result in: a. The aiteradon or destruction d a prohisbrie ar hbsorie ard+aeobgial site by dewlopmers within an arehaeologial aensiwe arw as identifbd in Section 3.0 - His0onal, Figuro 8, d trre City's General tslanl b. Atterotbn or destruction d a hia0odal sib, strraxure or object as listed in the Cily's Niaoorie Reaouross Recormaissana Survey? ? ~ OtMr? ruwaa rw+s.ec_ n+~wr c 0 C. DISCCTSSIOA QF EYVIRO?VMENTIL EVALUATION aV,D MITIGATION *SEaSC~RES - 1. EARTH RESOURCES a) The proposal will result in earth movement of aaproximately 29.199 cubic wards of rut and 23.597 cubic yards of fill balance due to shrinka3e factor). Grading in this quantity ma?- potentially result in various impacts related to soil erosion and dust. However, compliance with Public corks/ Engineering stan_'ard requirements for grading shail serve to reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Specifically, if any development is scheduled to be done bet::een October 15th and April 15th the Engineer shall submit a detailed erosion control plan including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or controi measures. or both, as may be necessary to protect adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such development. In addition, dust will be controlled by frequent watering of soil as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works/Engineering. ~ b) The proposed project will not result in development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15X natural grade. The I subject site has a natural grade up to approximately 8.5X. 2. AIR RESOL'Rr.£S e) The site is located in a high wind hazard area as identified in the City's General Plan. Standard requirements and conditions of approval pertaining to building construction will be placed at the Development permit stage. 3. S:dTcR RESO)~RCES a) Drainage Development of the vacant site xill reduce the amount of impermeable top soil which will increase surface water runoff. Th13 surface runof` is considered to Se insiZnifi_aat and mill be carried Sy off-3ite improvements into existing story drains as requirad Sy the Department of Public t±orks/ Engineering. • Initial Study Tentative Tract Nap 15228 • - September 18. 1??1 a. BIOLOGICAL RESOI:RCES a~ The subject site is located in t1? 9iological Resour^?s `lanagement Orerlay District as a resul*_ a biological su:-~-e~- was r_onducted on the subject sit? by John +ear. °iologicsl Resource Specialist. The biologist concluded that no significant biological resourc?s occur on the site and the removal of the existing c:eed~• ~•eoeta~ion is ~~t c~nsid?red significant. b.c.d? An arborist report ~reoa:?d by .lames 3rid:es identi__°ied w8 trees on site and 16 trees on adjacent land. A row of eucalyptus trees are situated along Ohio Avenue and a row of olive trees are located along Magnolia Avenue. The Tract has been designed to preser~•e these trees as much as possible. however some disturbance is necessary to accommodate Blackhawk Road. The current condition of most trees is good to dead. Seven trees are recommended for preservation in place or transplanting and the remaining trees are recommended .or removal due to damage or future liability of failure or death. The Parks and Recreation Department had evaluated the arborist report and the trees. The Parks and Recreation Department's recommendations are to preserve all trees not affected by construction in place and to transplant trees affected by ronstructien or replace the removed trees with 36" box native trees at a 2:1 ratio. These trees shall be planted on-site or on public lands in accordance with recommendations and requirements of the Parks and Recreation Department. ~omDliaace with the recommendations of the Parks and Re^r?3tion Department shall serve to reduce all impacts to a le~-el of insignificance. 6. LA\'D CSE c% ?he protect site is local?d within '~~othi:l Fir' gone C. Construction is not proposed at this tine. hos?~-er prop•;s~d construction shall be in compiianc? ::i*_h c~~•litions in ?f _`?.t at the time of aDDro~-al. 9. TRASSPfiRTATION/CIRCGLATIOY f.h` The Cit:•'s Traffic engineer has determined that the project will not result in inrrease•i safety- hazards to •:ehici?s. bicyclists or pe•iestrians and t,yat tie ?ro+ecr .ill not resulr_ in a significant increase in traffic •:olumes on the roa~lwa•:s. ., p O Initial Study - Tentative Tract Nap 15229 • September 18. 1??1 10 & 11. PUBLIC SERCICES 3 CTILZTIES a,b,c.d.e.f> all applicable publir_ service agencies have been given the opportunity to comment an the proposal. Comments have not been received indicating that they will not be able to provide adequate 1eveLs f service. 22. AESTHETICS a.b~ The proposal does not include the construction of anc single family homes at this time. The site is relativel;• flat. therefore development will not result in the obstruction of anv scenic view. Furthermore. Development Review Committee review and approval of elevations and Parks and Recreation Department landscaping requirements till serve to reduce an>• potential visual impacts to a level of insignificance. 13. CLZTGR~L RESOGRCES a.b~ The proposal is located in a potential prehistoric or historic archaeological site as identified in Section 3.0. figure A, pate 3-~ of the General Plan. d cultural resource review by the archaeological Information Center concluded that na cultural resources are knoKn to exist within or adjacent to the project area. Rovever. if during grading or construction such materials are encountered grading/constrvction shall be temporarily stopped. The Planniag Department shall be notified, the material shall be evaluated by a qualified archeologist. and appropriate data recovery/protection measures shall be implemented. - o. oereRwaw?noN - - . On the heals of thi initlal study. - ' - ~ TM propwed poject COULD NOT haw a aignili<ant eMect on the environmerd and a NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION wdl be prepared. The proposed project could haw a signiflnnt eflaet on the environmerd, ahhough than will not ba a signifipnt eRaa in thb caw baeauw the mrogatpn maaswes described above haw been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION witl ba prepared. Tha proposed project MAY haw a signilipnt affect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA Name and Title / - 1 r ~ ~C..~.~' Signature ~ Date: ..~~J~C.~ ~l? _ ~Q~~ I ~ ATTACHMENT F r "~ a~ z. ag Z m=wg s ,~ 2 c s Y ZmZ ~ ~U f ~s. ~ ID ~=VYY"~1 6 a. ~ ~ J ~ I~ - I u uU W < .Z b~ ` is I R {~~a'.t~ ~ ,,A' -~. 1 HaCrO +IJ.=.~QOWONW m~zo~zz.- aaao~ r .d 1 ' IIr~ , 1 i F v@ ~ a ~ ~Y'4. I~ ~ .A 'R.i~ +ar~ F a ' 1I'~ m SO 1 O _ i ~a ~ } ~ ~ \,t~ lI ~y~~l r~ ; is I s ~ I - ;, ~ ' .L i ., I ~ IQ ' ~ rc ~~F ~35~ Ij y y .K :'" «2 YEA "d"' ~~"' _ _ ,a `^~i r~`~~ d 1~J ~a ~ ? ~ .a o 6 ~ 1 f F- Y 1~ Y Z y v ,.r ¢ ~ wl. , r b ~ .Y qQY > ~ a_aY ' ii~*44 n r3~Sga °°<b a '~~ W ~ ~ e as ° ..=,3 ~ ~ s~ x~' yy ~ b~bb 2 a 3 S Y S k R ~ °gy x `_'=~~-y:~4~'4 ~ ~at~st: U ~Y #Y ~~g: ~~3r R y `o Sa~ ~EYy"aY~aR Y~ U Y~ / •- ~YqR"" tyWW~I~a ~ 3 W a >~~ie~; w bpi">r3 ~ .J. tJ YYt?~ N 555~dd3• ~ bt~~ ; bY~~ J " m YY~ ~ Ytil~ W 3644 .4YY Y~ ~ _Y=.~-ya 7 u ~71a~C 4V 9:YS J 3Y~C ~ ~%.~~ .W- ea u ~~~^", n ~ "~Aw+ w.~uw "" ¢ `R~blf~ a V ~bYtYt a - ~ ATTACHMEtdT G '~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA ITEM # AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TT 15228 CASE LOCATION - - 3 HEARING DATE _ / ;, ,- ~, ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ "r ~ Q- l ~ j ,'1~ ~/` / ~ //' ~/ '/, ~~, ~ / ; ~ o ~ ~ ~ ti r SITE "'~~~:~,/O ,` ti 4 ', ~ ?, ,' cc~ ' v / L ' / - -- -' YF y` ti ,~ ~ ` ~ Ei ~ ~,. ,; \ f ., , VERDEI~ONT N ' ~ '4 ~- ~'`• v Wes- ~ PWI.B.11 PAGE 1 OF 1 IK0) CI~PY OF SAN BER~RDINO - REQUEST ~OR COUNCIL ACTION Al Boughey, Director Subject: Tentative Tract No. 15228 Dept: Planning and Building Services Mayer and Common Council Meeting April 20, 1992 Date: April 9, 1992 Synopsis of Previous Council action: No previous action by the Mayor and Common Council. Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council approve Tentative Tract No. 15228; or That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council deny Tentative Tract No. 15228. ignature Al B Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached• Staff Report Ward• 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Description) Finance: ~ncil Notes: I~ilw~'wt41~. ~1-Zo-g2 ~3p' y~ -~ 1CI~X OF SAN BERI~RDINO -REQUEST ~R COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject: Final determination for Tentative Tract No. 15228, a request to establish an 18-lot single family subdivision. Mayor and Common Council Meeting of April 20, 1992 REQUEST Pursuant to Development Code Section 19.66.070, the applicants request approval of Tentative Tract No. 15228, to subdivide a parcel into 18 single-family residential lots. The request is before the Mayor and Common Council because a motion by the Planning Commission to deny the project failed by a tie vote. The subject property consists of 5.71 acres located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue in the RL, Residential Low, land use district. SACItGROUND lTovember 19, 1991 The Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on Tentative Tract No. 15228 (See Exhibit 1, Certificate of Mailing and Proof of Publication). After staff's presentation of the staff report, the Commission was advised that Staff received comments by telephone from Ms. Pat Smith, 3288 Meyers Road, on the day of the hearing. Ms. Smith stated that her property abuts the subject property and expressed concerns regarding the removal of trees, the lack of sewers and asked if it would still be legal to stable her stallions if the proposed subdivision is approved and occupied. After the opening of the public hearing, Donald and Jean Hanson, 180 W. Fiesta Green, Port Hueneme, spoke in Pavor of the application. Mr. Hanson stated that he and his wife own approximately 10 acres across the street from the subject property and they feel that the proposed subdivision would have a positive effect. Gary Smith, 3288 Meyers Road, then spoke in opposition to the request. He stated that the proposed lot sizes and density are incompatible with the existing development in the area, citing his and three other one-acre residential properties abutting the subject property to the south, which are the result of a four-lot subdivision approved in 1980. According to Mr. Smith, the recently approved smaller lot, higher density developments are destroying the quiet, low density character of the area. Mr. Smith also p O Tentative Tract No. 15228 Request for Final Determination Mayor and Common Council Meeting of April 20, 1992 Page 2 claimed that the arborist report prepared for the subject property was false. June Reeves, 3414 Belmont Avenue, spoke in opposition to the proposed subdivision, citing a lack of sewer service on Belmont Avenue and drainage concerns on Magnolia Avenue. Steven bevy, 1398 Meyers Road expressed opposition to the application, also citing drainage concerns. Sam Zayed, 3308 Meyers Road, spoke in opposition to proposal. He stated that he recently moved into the area and has invested in improvements to his property under the impression that the area would continue to be comprised of one-acre lots. Eugene Ehe, civil engineer for the project, then responded to the drainage and sewer issues. He stated that proper drainage could be ' carried to Belmont Avenue; however, due to the lay of the land, a drainage easement would be required along the neighboring property to the east (A.P.N. 261-071-2, 3, 9). The proposed conditions of approval require that the subdivider obtain the easement prior to recordation of the final map, but the neighboring property owner is unwilling to negotiate at this time. He also stated that all trees removed as a result of the development of the subdivision shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio, as indicated in the proposed conditions of approval. A motion then carried to continue the hearing to December 10, 1991 so that a representative from the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department could be present to answer questions regarding drainage issues, the proposed street design, and policies and procedures for the filing of final maps. Deaember 10, 1991 A quorum of the Planning Commissioners who originally heard the item on November 19, 1991 was not present, and the item was continued to January 7, 1992. January 7, 1992 The Planning Commission continued the item to March 3, 1992 at the request of the Planning Director. The purpose of the continuance request was to allow the applicant to make a final attempt to negotiate for an off-site drainage easement through the neighboring property to the east prior to taking action on the tentative map. This request was made because, pursuant to Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, if the City imposes a condition of approval _ p 4 Tentative Tract No. 15228 Request for Final Determination Mayor and Common Council Meeting of April 20, 1992 Page 3 requiring the subdivider to obtain an easement for offsite improvements, and the subdivider is unable to obtain the drainage easement by the time that the final map is filed, the City will be compelled to acquire the easement through eminent domain; in turn, the City would require the subdivider to pay the cost of acquiring the easement. xarah 3, 1994 Staff advised the Planning Commission that the owners of the neighboring property are still unwilling to grant off-site drainage easement rights to the applicant, so the proposed conditions of approval will require the subdivider to obtain the easement prior to recordation of the final map (Standard Requirement No. 18, Exhibit 4, Attachment D), potentially compelling the City to condemn the property. Commissioner Stone then asked staff if the proposed temporary dead end at the eastern end of the subject property would obligate the owner of the neighboring property to the east to continue the street if the adjacent parcels are ever developed. Staff responded that the neighboring property owner would be obligated to continue the street. Commissioner Stone then expressed concern that the neighboring, larger property would be "held hostage" by the subject property. A motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 15228 then failed by a tied 3- 3 vote. As a result of the failed motion, the application was forwarded to the Mayor and Common Council for final determination. OPTIONS AVAIL•~BL TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL• The Mayor and Common Council may approve Tentative Tract No. 15228. OR The Mayor and Common Council may deny Tentative Tract No. 15228. ~ 4 Tentative Tract No. 15228 Request for Final Determination Mayor and Common Council Meeting of April 20, 1992 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of Staff that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration; and 2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 15228 based upon the attached Findings of Fact (Exhibit 4, Attachment B), and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit 4, Attachement C) and Standard Requirements (Exhibit 4, Attachment D). Prepared by: Gregory S. Gubman Assistant Planner for Al Boughey, AICP Director of Planning and Building Services Exhibits: 1 - Certificate of Mailing and Proof of Publication for Planning Commission Hearing 2 - Statement of Planning Commission Action 3 - Official Notice of Public Hearing before the Mayor and Common Council 4 - Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated November 19, 1991 © CZTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CruTrFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that at 11.00 on ~,'hursdav. November 7. I caused to be deposited in the United States Mail at the San Bernardino City Hall letters giving notice of a public hearing to be conducted by the Director of Planning and Building Services, as follows: Variance NO. 91-13 6 Review of Plans No. 91-24 Tentative Tract No. 15228 Conditional Use Permit No. 90-61 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: November 19, 1991 The above described letters were sent by =i_st-class mail, postage prepaid and addressed as per attached list. n DATE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF Subscribed and sworn to before me L%~,,/~ This ~~L-- day of /'Z%'.'~:i~! ~,~? ~ , 1941 i.~ - CITY CLERK / • ~ `'~ /, /' ~ • Exhibit 1 ta.,.«.r.._~,.---I po.ae brw tr ttlllq lttaq alltry Proof of Publication -_, _ ~ : . = - . CITY CF aAN gERNAROINO "I PLANNING JZVISION CITY C- CLi : '" 1 OP P1a1l.IC /1/~~IN6 NO}t~ t~ ~p , iM TMAT TMEf ~rl AN E NAR$p, INO STA?E OF CALIFORYIA. } ss• ~I~ Na"""EAII~ ON 6 Y. NOv County of San Bernardino, w Ir, IMI ATAr rm P 'he undersigned hereby certifies u Follows: ~fNOp~p l~Y~pp~ I am a eitiun of the railed States, o+•er the age of twenty-one years, and not a ~ ~' party to nor interested in the abo+•e-entitled matter; 1 am the principal clerk of the n~rt~tus_E PeR printer of a newspaper, to wit, The Sun; the same wu at all lima herein mentioned a u~ ~ a newspaper of general circulation printed and published daily, including Sunday, in the p~ a1 ~ City of San .3ernardino, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California; said ~~'E~ newspaper so published every day of the year u and under the name of The Sun, said er a -e- newsoaper u been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior ~, saes Court of the state of California, in and for thr County of San Bernardino, by a judg- er. A""'•••~•,",o av ment of said Superior Court duly m..de, filed and rntered on June, 1952, in the irt:alwr td"r~wn~a~n records and files of said Superior Court in that ttrtain proceeding entitled In the Nat- T°• •OPtaka"tra~'r` ter of the:tscertainment and Establishment of The iun as a \ewspaper of General Cit- ~~oa~IVeMS.'~'~rio~n culation, numbered ;3084 in the rernrds of civil proceedings in said Superior Cotut Ices a a.rrrw an •,_ and by judgment modih•ing the same, alw made, filed and entered in said proceeding; °•^'i°" •na rvnloau a :he not Y or other prxess or document hrreinafter mentioned wu set, printed and ~ v' published in type not smaller than nonpareil and was preceded with words printed in ~1in0~ µ bluk (att type not smailer than nonpareil describing and expressing in general terms waPM I~ir: Naroinv the purpcr: or charaMer of the notitt intended to be given; std the v~sia txn n_u ANo suelac7 arovanv OFFZC'_AL NCTICE OF PUBLIC HEARZNG n~w ~ Pty ~' • acralroularlY-+nawa wnai a lane ranraraq a assn verso sauara Iaal rrva,a • rraaaw a aaau 90-61, 1-'4, 15228 s$-~.irws~na - - M aawl! 111 Isar rarln a er anNrelr a 1111 s•vu of which the annexed u a true printed copy, was published in each edition and issue of i ~„I~~ ~'0i0~ said newspaper of general circulation, and not in any supplement thereof, on each of ~, IA the following dates, to wit: v..~ w~+t• as ~vya. »xosass a .wvlirl nl/O-MaY COTT1ICia eIN,aIrM 11W ix 10 Nal +riaal rM Rarialr a Na 11-at. wlaar NOVEMBER 8, 1991 0 te~0°0.~ao~t a IAM sour foal. rarnilr ro}Iaance rata - ~WIM1iM1 M aK4~ ,n INIraI Pqn boe~- ~~S naWra I certify under penalty of prriun~ that thr foregoing is true and correct. vyar~ ~r~ a~wr~ ~~i~_v. ~L„~,, e--r~~ a racranvuiarir-+nawa I IlorcM a lane eawu,n• a atlsul 3.71 avaa Ialalw u Executed on the 8 day of :iCVEMHER rw sauelaau corner or. l9 .41 ,at ataoAWnY1 "u°'w-~ t4 AYNMIe N a IroM- San Bernardino, in satd County and State. ••a °I ~ p.r °nL rlle aalMl ac Aw-I teo.a Illla anew ava.st14;; ~aoll°^slw wn a~W la~ N eY sn: ~ja ~t,ytan Y^n~: // 'I City of San Bernardino STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT Number: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15228 Applicant: James Stancliff, William Hauser Owner: Same ACTION Meeting Date: March 3, 1992 X A motion was made to deny the project; however, the motion did not carry with a tie vote: (The project is considered to be denied and will be placed on the Mayor and Council agenda for final determination.) VOTE Ayes: Lopez, Ortega, Romero Nays: Cole, Dinges, Stone Abstain:' None Absent: ~ Clemensen, Vallee, Jordan i, hereby, certify that this Statement of Official Action accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning ~ Commission of the Cit/y of San Bernardino. Signa re Date L. E. Reed, Assistant Director of Planning & Building services Name and Title cc: Project Applicant Pro j ect Property Owner Plan Check Engineering Division yCase File PLANNINGCOMSN/AIG7 Exhibit 2 ` ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION SUBJECT: WARD # TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15228 3 PROPERTY LOCATION: Subject property is arectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of about 5.71 acres located at the southeast corner of Ohio Avenue and tagnolia Avenue having a frontage of about 735.5 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a frontage of 336.5 feet on the east side of Magnolia Avenue. PROPOSAL: To establish an 18 lot single-family residential subdivision in the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation. PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL '~- COUNCIL CHAMBERS ~ ~ ~ ' `' ~' ~ ~ • 300 NORTH 'D' STREET ~L ~ , ; '' ~ ~' , SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418 ~~/~~ ,;'l, , , i Q/ /i j ~/; ;' , ~/ -i - I HEARING DATE AND TIME: N ^v /; i, / // Tuesday, Nov. 19, 1991 7:00 p.m. ,- '•; /,~ AOa.W0Y7rtlpW7alMpaPeWY7b1YNIMPYmYgr7l6,Y7Yp8.NNYtl ~ 1 ' Otltlbraa~w.pptlar~tlbiu7.Ykn~ICnambrawaWPttlrtlur S~ ~,/Q ~1` wbb ~c PY7wanWt71tlPY7WytY7CYW0Yq tbtt.a opwitla ntbttm orey ptlwq 0tp 7wlm. ~ lltl PW Wi0 OswatlYn Y wWwYq /w P.PY4.~~ ~ pu N unW tl ~~'.r .OMk,yoYinyWllMlr,tllna.~~tbba~efaaNeFpe.YbnblMpapnatllM ~ v / Q SbM. p.n ~M.tltlY0. C.Ileni.~l~iL ~ fm BMnnCYtl OIIP MW ]00 HwN ~' ~ ~ ,~ o.a+Ye.antlPrwoeann..Y,..Awmts+n.wwwrv,m~,~..co. ~RL~ ~'C/Q~ `' euatr w Pw7aY. atltl. a P(w. Ttl77rM 7777a IIR..ta VrYts., t.+tl. ~ .ppntldblM tlNp71n0071a.i Ap7b.Ybb YAYtn m00aPitlII1W aP~O.Y _ / whip. toaY7pMptatltbatttl+ipa.tla b71M Y..aniYMtlbGly Clwk aetq ~~'' abtn.Aa.nw~Y.w~Yw.taa.aetlaaYY.p..ar.aPwrww.na ~ lij /`v r¦wrY. rtla wtt+ti ~ N / ~ 5/ . 7A77. atryr or.r PYr, M7r7s7witl ra Amr7tln.a b 7M MuYAPY C00. wa.onr~raY,..waaetltl~a.acaPpxb,mraatln. ~u~~ prewatliw~awww.aaw.tanrPw.tYpcamrrenYmw.ram.r ((n~~ r` W Ynibtl b7aaep7M?tY7M Ynws puOf 77,btlMtl.Y.tlWA lptl peYelrYO Ortlp0Y11iYnWS,aYwltlmm~wPSMtlsNYw.ObtltlCMyPY7bYgOYYYn \ ' a,rP7Yr7awPa+YUrYp. VERDENONT N© ' - Q+•: pmp4 PWFODI PARE 1 OF 7 (a.pp) 0!r:QER OF RECORD " J;: !1.~ '~.~..~~lr~ a .`.t t.~.i ,;ARSE AND ADDRE55~-~ C• IL\USfai, TRU~TCL ~ COUNTER CHRN 0 G?0 Lobos Street Dbnterey, CA 9.+940 SIIEET ~~OF~~ T'RESENTATIVE [\1'IRO\.'IE?dT:1L IIICIITF.CH APFLZCANT ' NAT1E 6 ADDRESS ..A.ME AND ADDRESS J:LV IVOLF JAMES R. STANCLIFT 32^ V. C Street - 620 Lobos St. San Bernar~ino, CA Monterey, CA 93940 SPIEGEL E.~TERPRISES ALFRED $ PATRTCIA.COOPER PACIFIC LAND $ DEVELOPHE!!T 2050 S. Bundy Drive Ste 225 6;i 76 Magnolia Ave. PRID10 DEVELOPMENT CO. Los Angeles, CA 90025 San Bernardino, CA 924 9849 Flower St. Ste D 261-032-02 261-062-20 Bellflower, CA 90706 261-032-OS • ~- DONALD $ JEAN HANSON OHIO PARTNERS BRENTON f, NICKIE RHOADES 180 W. Fiesta Green 378 S. Euclid Ste A 3230 Belmont Ave. ~ . ~t Hueneme, CA 93041 Upland, CA 91786 Sati6n Bernardino,-_CA~ 924t 261-031-01 261-032-06 Zb}-0~~-873 261-031-02 RONALD COLLETTE HENRY KURT?. !VAYNE BRINDLEY JANE FIKE 9433 Apricot Ave. A720 Woodley Ave. ate 20. Alta Loma. CA 91701 Sepulveda, CA •91343 261-062-16 261-071-OS NICK $ JANIE LITRAS BREN7Y)N $ NICKIE RHOADEC,_: 3455 Meyers Road 3230 Belmont Ave. San Bernardino, CA 92407 San Bernardino, CA 924 261-071-08 261-062-17 AHSAN HABIB MD PHILIP f, PATRICIA CURREY lfOHAMED RAFIQULLAH KHAN 6804 Magnolia Ave. 766 E. Norbert St. San Bernardino. CA ~ 92~ CA 92404 261-071-12 San Bernardino, • 261-062-18 DAVID $ PM1 SIMPSON BRENT HOLlfES 3395 lfeyers Road 3308 Meyers San Berrardino, CA 92407 San Bernardino, CA 924 261-062-19 261-071-13 . GARY $ PATRICIA SMITH STEVEN M. LEVY ' 444 N. Arrowhead Ave. M204 3298 Meyers Road San Bernardino, CA 92401 San Bernardino, 'CA 924 261-071-15 261-071-14 E~~' . J ~7~~7~~ CITY OF SANP~3ERNARDINO -°.~EMORANDUM To Planning Commission From Al Boughey, Director Planning & Building Sv: ..~+bject Tentative Tract No. 15228 - Date February 14, 1992 Approved Item No. 1 Data March 3, 1992 BACKGROUND The above referenced application was heard by the Planning Commission on November 19, 1991. The hearing was continued to December 10, 1991 so that a representative from the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department could be present to answer questions regarding drainage issues, the proposed street design, and policies and procedures for the filing of final maps. At the Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1991, a quorum of the Planning Commissioners who originally heard the item on November 19, 1991 was not present, and the item was continued to January 7, 1992. At the Planning Commission meeting of January 7, 1992, the Planning Commission continued the item to March 3, 1992 at the request of i the Director of Planning & Building Services. The purpose of the continuance request was to allow the applicant to make a final attempt to negotiate for an off-site drainage easement through the neighboring property to the east prior to approval of the tentative map. The owners of neighboring property are still unwilling to grant the easement, so conditions of approval will require that the developer obtain the easement prior to recordation of the final map (see Standard Requirement No. 18, Attachment D). Pursuant to Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, if the subdivider is unable to obtain the drainage easement by the time that the final map is Piled, the City will be compelled to acquire the easement through eminent domain. In turn, the City shall require the subdivider to pay the cost of acquiring the easement. Enclosure: Staff report and attachments _ Exhibit 4 n CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 SUMMARY _ HEARING DATE 11-19-91 WARD 5 APPLICANT: James STancliff William Hauser W 744 Creekland Circle TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 15228 owNER: San Jose, CA 95133-1545 V SAhIE ~ The applicant request to create an 18-lot single family subdivision with a W minimum parcel size of 10,800 square feet. ~ Subject property consists of 5.71 acres located at the southeast corner of htagnolia i;venue and Ohio Avenue in the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use district. W i Q EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY ~ j~$E Z~G DESIGNATION Subject Vacant RL Residential Low (forth Vacant RL' Residential Low South Single Family Residential RL Residential Low East Vacant ~ P.L Residnetial Low (lest Vacant RL Residential Low GEOLOGIC /SEISMIC ? YES FLOOD HAZARD ? YES ? ZONE A SEWERS: ? YES HAZARD ZONE: ? NO ZONE: NO ? ZONE B ®NO HIGH FIRE ? YES AIRPORT NOISE/ ? YES REDEVELOPMENT ? YES HAZARD ZONE: ~ NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA: ~ ~ ~ Q ? NOT ? POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z ~ _ APPROVAL APPLICABLE EFFECTS WITH O N MITIGATING MEASURES NO E.I.R. Q ®CONDITIONS ~ Z ? EXEMPT ? E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO W Z ? DENIAL SGNIFICANT EFFECTS a W Z MATH MITIGATING ~ ~ ~ MEASURES ~ ? CONTINUANCE TO Z ®NO SIGNIFlCAN7 ? 31GNIFlCANT EFFECTS V W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. W MINUTES f~ e-.m„~e w.~„~snso PLNiaD2 vKiE t OF t CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT gGENDA ITEM O~@Cp~/ /~ T~OIVS _ HEARING DATE ~~77GG11'"'ll YY /1 1~1~7 PAGE REQUEST Pursuant to Development Code Section 19.66.070, the applicants request approval of Tentative Tract No. 15228, to establish 18 single-family lots in an area that is designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. SITE LOCATION The subject property is a rectangular parcel consisting of approximately 5.7 acres located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Ohio Avenues (Please see Attachment F, Tentative Map and Attachment G, Location Map). DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL P CONSISTENCY Tentative Tract No. 15228 is consistent with the standards and guidelines of the Development Code and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan, as shown in Attachment A. SUBDIVISION ItLaP ACT Tentative Tract No. 15228 was submitted in compliance with Section 66426 of the Subdivision Map Act. The subdivider has agreed to comply with the provisions imposed by the City under the authority of Chapter 4 of the Map Act. CEOA STATUS An Initial Study was prepared by Staff and presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 26, 1991. The ERC determined that no significant impacts would result from the project and recommended a Negative Declaration. The proposed Negative Declaration was advertised and available for public review and comment from October 3, 1991 to October 23, 1991. As of this writing, no comments have been received from the public. BACKGROUND The application for Tentative Tract No. 15228 was submitted on February 19, 1991. The application was deemed incomplete on March 18, 1991 pending the submittal of an arborist report, a biological report and an archaeological review fee. On May 22, 1991, all of the requested information was received and the application was deemed complete on June 18, 1991. PWNDB PKiE t OF 1 laml . p O CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REM O~ce~\/ /~ T'O~c _ HEARING DATE - - V ` Y f'1 V PAGE ANALYSIS Bits Charaateristias The 5.71 acre site is located within the boundaries of the verdemont area. The property slopes slightly from north to south at an approximate natural grade of 8.53. A row of eucalyptus trees is located adjacent to the north property frontage along Ohio Avenue and a row of olive trees is located to adjacent to the Magnolia Avenue frontage on the west. The surrounding area is characterized by vacant residential properties Project Charaateristias Lot Design The proposed 18 lots range in size Prom 10,800 square feet to 12,250 square feet. The design of the lots are essentially rectangular in shape. The southward natural gradation of the property has resulted in the southern tract boundary to be located at the toe of a slope. The presence of a downward slope within a rear yard, depending on the steepness, may lead to maintence and usability problems. The elimination of the slope would require the construction of a 10- foot retaining wall facing the exterior of the tract, which could be visually imposing and obstruct scenic views currently enjoyed by adjacent properties. Based on the circumstances, it is Staffs recommendation that a maximum 3:1 slope be allowed, which would reduce maintenance problems and eliminate the need for a retaining wall. Access and Circulation Access to all parcels will be Prom Magnolia Avenue by means of a new 767-foot street which will terminate at a temporary cul-de- sac. The intent of the temporary turnaround is to allow the subdivider to maximize the number of lots while facilitating the future extension of the street if the adjacent parcel to the east is ever developed. .w PLAlLOD9 PAGE 1 OF 1 14 W1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM OBSERVATIONS _ HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 3 Section 19.30.200(6) of the Development Code requires a tentative tract map to provide for at least two different standard routes !or ingress and egress. A standard route is a road which is dedicated to the City and has a minimum paved width of 24 feet. The two standard means of access for the subject property shall be provided by Magnolia and Ohio Avenues. As a condition of approval, the subdivider shall be required to improve Magnolia and Ohio so that they become standard routes; that is, they shall be required to ba widened and paved from the tract entry to the point where they tie into a standard street system. Sellers and Drainage The site is currently isolated from development, and sewer service does not reach the subject property. The nearest sewer line is located in Chestnut Avenue, and terminates south of Belmont Avenue --approximately 1,200 feet south of the subject property. The sewer cannot be extended north along Chestnut due to a large dip in Belmont. Hence, until contiguous development reaches the adjoinq parcels, the only way to provide sewer service to this subdivision would be through securing an easement from the adjoining property to the south or east. Additionally, the property drains to the east and a drainage easement will be required. At this time, the property owners to the east are not willing to negotiate for easement rights. Therefore, conditions of approval shall make final recordation of the map contingent upon the acquisition of an easement for sewer and drainage purposes from the easterly terminus of the subject property southerly to Belmont Avenue. The easement shall be 15 feet wide. Sewer and drainage improvements shall be installed in the easement to serve the development as approved by the City Engineer. Additional sewer and/or drainage improvements may be required to reach an adequate outlet. Traffic impacts The City Traffic Engineer has determined that additional trips from the proposed project are not sufficient to cause a significant impact on the adjacent street system. Total traffic volume will be less than the street design capacity. However, a traffic systems fee, estimated in the amount o! S2,383 shall be collected prior to the final recordation o! the map. 4~° PV1N.ly9 PAGE 7 OF 1 (4WD CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 OBSERVATIONS - HEARING DATE 11-I9-91 PAGE 4 Bioiogiaai assourass tezoiuainq trees) The site is located within the Biological Resources Management Overlay (BRMO), as identified in Section 10, Figure 41, Resources of the City's General Plan. A biological assessment was conducted by John Wear and Timothy J. Wade of the Lilburn Corporation on April 19, 1991. The consultants concluded that no significant biological resources occur on the site; thus, no mitigation was recommended. Trsas oa sits There are currently 48 standing trees on the subject property, primarily consisting of a wind row of 34 eucalyptus trees along Ohio Avenue and a row of 13 olive trees adjacent to Magnolia Avenue. The subdivision has been designed to preserve these trees as much as possible; however, construction of the new street (Blackhawk Road) and right-of-way dedications will displace several of the olive trees. A California Certified Arborist report was prepared on April 26, 1991 by James F. Bridges (T.S.A. Certificate No. 386). The trees were identified and catalogued in the report and plotted on a map, which is on file with the Planning Division. The report concluded that only 14 of the 48 trees were sufficiently viable to be saved in place or transplanted. The report identified the remaining trees as diseased or dead and recommended their removal. The report and recommendations have bean reviewed by Planning and Parks and Recreation staff. Additionally, Parks and Recreation staff physically inspected the trees on site and concluded that All of the trees on site are sufficiently viable to be retained in place, relocated or replaced. Based upon these analyses, if the project is approved, Staff recommends the following mitigation measures: 1. All trees not affected by construction shall be retained in place; and 2. All trees affected by construction shall be transplanted or replaced with 36-inch box native trees at a two-to-one replacement ratio. These trees shall be planted on-site or on public lands in accordance with the recommendations and requirements of the Parka and Recreation Department. Q ~ PL~N~ILB PAGE 1 OF 1 µAO) 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE Ti 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 OBSERVATIONS - HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 5 Enforcement of these mitigation measures shall be accomplished through the Traa Removal Permit process established by the City. Cultural Resources The subject property is located within an area of concern for archaeological resources, as identified in the Historical Element of the City's General Plan (Section 3.0, Figure 8). A preliminary cultural resources review was conducted by Lester Ross, coordinator at the Archaeological Information Center o! the San Bernardino County Museum. Mr. Ross determined that the potential for the presence of cultural resources within the project area is low. ]1s a result of the negative findings, a field reconnaisance for cultural resources was not undertaken. COMMENTS RECEIVED Area Residents No comments have been received as of the writing of this staff report. Councilman Tom ![inor (hard 5) In comments submitted to Staff, Councilman Minor stated that his support is strictly contingent upon the project making adequate provisions for infrastructure. It is the opinion of Staff that the conditions of approval and standard requirements fully address these issues. San Bernardino Onified 8ahool District The project will be subject to school impact fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance. IIaited States Postal Service The Postal Service requests that the final map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centrals-zed mail delivery units. A condition of approval has been proposed for the inclusion of such easements. The specific locations for such unite shall be to the satisfaction of the Postal Service and Public Works Department. °«~°..~.~, vuw.on v~ i oc i i..9m p 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 OBSERVATIONS - HEARING DATE 11-29-91 PAGE 6 CONCLUSION Tentative Tract No. 15228 complies with all of the development standards of the Development Code and is consistent with the Ganera2 Plan. Tentative Tract No. 15228 is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act. To address potential environmental impacts and infrastructure deficiencies, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and conditions of approval. It is the conclusion of Staff that, based upon the project design and proposed conditions of approval, the project will not pose a detriment to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration; and 2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 15228 based upon the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment Bj, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachemnt D). Re//s~~pectfull .submitted, (X/~, Al Boughey, AICP Director of Planning and Building Services Gregory S. Gutman Assistant Planner Attachments: A - Development Code and General Plan Consistency B - Findings of Fact C - Conditions of Approval D - Standard Requirements E - Initial Study F - Tentative Tract Map G - Location Map z.^,.,~..w .P._.~~ PLANJLB PME 1 OF 1 LL.9m n~ ~n~,(lf~Lin n CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM O~~GR Y /~ T1ONC _ HEARING DATE ' Gll Y /y ~7 PAGE DEVELOPMENT CODE ]1ND GENER7IL YL11E CONSISTENCY Dav~lopaont Cat~gorp Yroposai Coda Gaaarai Ylaa Use Single- family homes Permitted Permitted Min. Lot 10,800 sq. 10,800 sq. 10,800 sq. Site ft. ft. ft. No. of Lots 18 18 max. 18 max. Min. Lot 80 ft. 80 ft. N/A width Min. Corner 88 ft. 88 ft. N/A Lot width Min. Lot 135 ft. 100 ft. N/A Depth Frontage All Lots All Lots N/A on Dedicated streets Standard Two: Maq- Two min. N/A Means of nolia and Access and Ohio rwMin~e- PLANJD! PILiE 1 OF 1 (~-9% ATTACHMENT 6© CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT C AGENDA ITEM FINDINGS OF I ACT - HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 8 1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, in that the purpose of the map is to provide for the development of single-family homes at a density o! 3.1 dwelling units per acre, as permitted within the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use district. 2. The design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan in that the minimum proposed lot size is 10,800 square feet, as required in the RL land use district. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type oP development proposed, in that the tentative map conforms to the subdivision design standards of the Development Code, the proposed street complies with the minimum standards of the Public Works Department, the two routes of access can be improved to meet City standards and water and sewer service can be accomplished through the acquisition of easement rights through adjacent properties. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the subdivision design complies with all lot area and dimensional standards, as well as required public improvements standards. 5. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause Substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, in that mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and conditions of approval to protect, relocate and replace the existing trees on site. 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that environmental health concerns are addressed and mitigated through the design and construction standards of all public services and public and private structures. 7. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, in that no such easements traverse the subject property. Q . e /w~i!oS4 PL11N~Y,OB PILE 10F 1 14901 ® ATTACHMENT C O CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS - HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 9 1. No tree shall be removed, replaced or relocated prior to the issuance of a Tree Removal Permit. The removal, replacement or relocation of any tree shall be subject to the provisions established by the mitigation measures contained in the Initial Study for Tentative Tract No. 15228. 2. Downward facing slopes abutting the southerly subdivision boundary shall not exceed 3:1. Perimeter walls or fences shall be located at the bottom of said slopes, abutting the subdivision boundary. 3. Walls and Fences: a. The perimeter walls adjacent to Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue shall be constructed of either slumpstone, split- faced block or stuccoed block with decorative caps. The walls shall have articulated planes, by providing at a minimum for every 100 feat of continuous wall, an 18- inch deep by 8-foot long landscaped recession. Pilasters shall be provided at avert' change in direction, every 5- foot difference in elevation and at a minimum of every 25 feet of continuous wall. b. All wood fences used within the tract shall be treated with heavy body stains or paints. 4. The final map shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. Specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the U.S.P.S., the Public Works Department and the Planning Division. 5. Building permits and utility clearances shall be issued in full compliance with Resolution No. 89-116, Resolution No. 90-02 and Ordinance No. MC-690. 6. No home shall be constructed, or building permit issued, without formal design review and approval of a Development Permit by the review bodies empowered by the City to approve or deny Development Permits for 18-unit single-family residential developments. e•~~-~~ ....°-- -------- -- o ' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 CONDITIONS _ HEARING DATE - - PAGE Construction shall De in substantial contornance - with the P1anIS1 approved by the Director. Developnent Review Connittee. Plannin¢ Connisaion or Mayor and Connon Council. Minor nodification to the plan(s) shall be subject to approval by the Director through a ninor nodification pernit process. Anv nodification which exceeds 1UZ of the followin¢ allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refilin¢ of the • ori¢inal aDPlication and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearin¢ review authority if applicable. 1. On-site circulation and parkin. loadin¢ and landacapin¢: 2. Placement and/or hei¢ht of walls, fences and structures: 3. Reconfi¢uration of architectural features. includin¢ colors. and/or nodification of finished materials that do not alter. or coapromise the previously aDProved tfiene: and. w. A reduction in density or intenaitc of a development Droject. Within one year of developnent approval. comnencesent of construction shall have occurred or the pernit/approval shall becone null and void. In addition. if after commencement of construction. work is discontinued for a period of one year. then the pernit/approval shall becone null and void. Projects nay be Duilt in phases if preapproved by the review authority. If a project is built in preapproved phases, each subsequent phase shall have one year from the previous phase's date of coastruction commencement to the next phase's date of construction commencement to have occurred or the pernit/approval shall becone null and void. Project:------------------------------------------ Expiration Date:_--------------------------------- p 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 3 PAGE CONDITIONS - "E`iR1NGDA~ - - 8• The review authority say, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause. grant one tine extension not to exceed 12 months. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code provisions. 9• In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the natter. Once notified, the applicent agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to Dav as a result of such action. but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. No vacant, relocated. altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use of land or structure~s~ shall be inaugurated, or no new business commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued Dv the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed with the Department of Public ilorka prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the landowner shall file a ¦aintenance agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain shall ensure that if the landowner, or subsequent owners), fails to saintain the required/installed site improvements. the Citv will be able to file an appropriate lienls~ against the property in order to accomplish the required ¦aintenance. gr._ ~ nw~aa~ r~~oai wai ' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REM CONDITIONS _ HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE 12 10.___ Phis perwit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirewents of the following Cit~• Departments or Divisions: ___X___ _ Fire Department X Parka, Recreation & Comnunitr• Services Departwent BuildinII Services Division of the Planning and BuildinY Services ~ Depart went Police Department Public Services !Refuse) Department ___X______ Public Works /EnQineerin~) Department X Water Departwent a~ s ....i"~° PUNMp nAOfe ~ OF ~ Wpl 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REM CON~~T~ONS _ HEARING DATE - - PAGE ____11____ This permit or approval is subject to all the aDPlicaDle provisions of the Development Code in effect at the tine of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property Development Standards. and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and grading activities; emission control of fumes. vapors. gases and other forma of air pollution; glare control; exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control. Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior structural equipsent, or utility transformers. boxes, ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground. A sign program for all new commercial. office and industrial centers of three or more tenant spaces shall be approved by the Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This requirement also includes any applicable Land Uae District Development Standards for residential, commercial and industrial developments regarding sinimu¦ lot area, minimum lot depth and width, ¦inimus setbacks, ¦aximus height, maximum lot coverage, etc. This development shell he required to maintain a minimum of _ _ standard off-street narking spaces as shown on the approved plan~sl on file. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 15228 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT gGENDA ITEM CONDITIONS _ HEAAINGDATE 11-19-91 PAGE 14 12. A Composite Development Plan :CDP shall be filed xith the Public Works and Planning and Building Services Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processin¢ by the City. The CDP shall Drovide additional survey and ¦ap inforwation includin¢, but not limited to. buildin¢ criteria (i.e. setDacka>, flood control criteria. seismic and ¢eolo¢ical criteria. environmental criteria and easements of record. The CDP shall be labeled xith the title "Cowposite Development Plan". and contain a section entitled "CDP Notes" The applicant shall have listed under the CDP notes section the folloxin¢ conditions or ¦iti¢atin¢ weasurea ' required for the development of the subject property: 13. Within txo years of this approval, the filin¢ of the final sap or parcel ¦ap with the Council shall have occurred or the approval shall become null and void. Expiration of a tentative wap shall terminate all proceedin¢s and no final ¦ap or parcel sap shall be filed xithout first processin¢ a nex tentative ¦ap. The City En¢ineer ¦uat accept the final ¦ap or parcel ¦ap documents as adequate for approval by Council prior to forxardin¢ then to the City Clerk. The date the sap shall be deewed filed xith the Council is the date on xhich the City Clerk receives the sap. The review authority may, upon application filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for ¢ood cause. ¢rant an extension to the expiration date pursuant to Section 19.66.170 of the Developnent Code and the State Map Act. Tentative Tract No. 15228 Project:------------------------------------------ Expiration Date:____November 19, 1993 :.'~°s nwwo wr~r Via, :4am ATTACHMENT D ~-~-- CITY .OF SA ERNARDINO PURL WORKa/EN011. CASE TR 15228 STANDARD. REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM s _ HEARING DATE 11-19-9 PAG NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the app scant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainage and Flood Control All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer, which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. i. A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to miti- gate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right- of-way dedicated as necessary. The development is located within Zone A on the federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. is rain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclu- sively show that the drain is not needed to protect your develop- ment or mitigate downstream impacts. 2. All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drain age facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfac- tion of the City Engineer. 3. Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge suffi- ciently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit requirements. Erosion Control 4. An Erosion Control Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to grading plan approval. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. ~ , ' '. ~ • CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBI.lC WORKS/EN~Oit. ~g TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM - HEARING DATE Grading ' 5. X If more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage. plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit wiil De required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. 6. X If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section T012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report sha1T be incorporated in the grading plan. ' X An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. ilhere feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and Shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if reciprocal` drainage, access, sewer. and/or parking is proposed to cross lot lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines. g, X The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. g. X A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain landscaping within the following areas: Parkwav area and landscape easement along the South side of Ohio Avenue. X Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided for the Landscape Maintenance District. CaTY OF S 3ERNARDINO ~ WOfiKs/ElIQR" CASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE ~~- PAG ~ Utilities 11. Design and construct ali public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City code, City Standard and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV. 12. Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer faci- 1 i ti es so i t can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. 13. Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be con- structed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. 14. X Utility services shall be placed underground and easements pro- vided as required. 1S. X A11 existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in actor dance with Section 19.20.030 (non-subdivisions) or 19.30.110 (subdivisions) of the Development Code. 16. X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engin- eer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where practical. 17. A "communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets with- in and adjacent to this project. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernar- dino. 18. X An easement for sewer and drainage purposes shall be acquired from the Easterly terminus of Blackhawk Road Southerly to Belmont Avenue. The easement shall be at least 15' wide. Sewer and drainage improvements shall be installed in the easement to serve the development as approved by the City Engineer. Additional sewer and/or drainage improvements may be required to reach an adequate outlet. CaTY OF .$ ~BERNARDINO PUB WORKS 522E~IGR- CASE STANDARQ REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 3 NEARING ~TE~~ Ma in 19. X A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. 20. X A11 street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. 21. X Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones. seismic lines and set- backs, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-592. Improvement Coopletions 22. X Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for~the entire pro- ject shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the final/Parcel Map. 23. X If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Final/Parcel Map, an improvement security accom- panied by agreement executed by the developer and the City will ~ be required. If the required improvements are not proposed to be completed prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. a deferred improvement agreement in accordance with Section 19.30.160 of the Development Code will be required. If the agreement is approved, an improvement certificate shall be placed on the Parcel Map stating that the required improvements will be completed upon develop- ment. Applicable to Parcel Maps consisting of 4 or less parcels only. 24. X Street light energy fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. 25. X A11 rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from the following streets: Ohio Avenue qTY OF SAI~ERNARDINO PUBLC3 WORtCa/EMOA. CASE TR 1~99A STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 11-19-91 PAGE Street Improvement and Dedications: 26, X A11 public streets within and adjacent to ,the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting sftall De shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 27. X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-Nay (Ft.) Curb Line (Ft.) Ohio Avenue 30' 20' Magnolia Avenue 32' 18' 8lackhawk Road 30' 16' 28. X A temporary turnaround shall be constructed at the Easterly terminus of 8lackhawk Road. 29. X Curb return radius shall be 25'. 30. X Construct handicap ramp per Std. No. 205 at Southeasterly corner of Ohio Avenue and Magnolia Avenue, and on both corners of the intersection of 8lackhawk Road and Magnolia Avenue. 31. X Two means of access to this subdivision shall be provided conforming to Section 19.30.200 of the Development Code. Each access shall be at least 24' wide paved and dedicated unless ~ parking is allowed, in which case the access shall be at least 28' paved width. Additional dedicated width may be required for drainage control. • A qTY OF SAh BERNARDINO PUBLk: WORKs/EtiQR. ~E TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA STEM 3 _ HEARING DATE ~ Required Engineering Persits: 32. X Grading permit (if applicable.). 33. X On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), includes landscaping. 34. X Off-site improvements construction permit. Applicable Engineering Fees (Fees subject to change rithout notice) 35. X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map - 51,000.00 plus 530.00 per lot or parcel. 36. Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 3Y and 2.5f, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of off-site improvements. 37. X Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 1S and 1X, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of on-site 1 improvements. including landscaping. 38, X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required) - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. gg, X Drainage fee in the amount of ~0.113/SF 52,205.48/Lot Max. 40. X Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of 5132.40/House Exact amount shall be determined by the City Tra is ngineer at time of application for Building Permit. 41. X Sewer connection fee in the amount-. of 5235.43/Bedroom 42. X Sewer inspection fee 515.84 per connection *Estimated construction cost is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engineer. 4~ 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PI~LIC WORKS/ENGR. CASE TR 15228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 3 1iEARING DATE i1-19=91 PAGE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS - VERDEMONT AREA PROJECTS 43. X This development will be required to pay Infrastructure Development Fees prior to issuance of building permits in the amount of 56,976.00 per single family residence. 44. X This single family residential project lies within the Chestnut Storm Drain Fee boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of E0.133 per square foot shall be paid'(not to exceed 52,050.00 per lot) to the City prior to approval of building permits. This commercial, industrial. or multiple residential project lies within the Chestnut Storm Drain fee boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of 50.138 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of building area, paving or other impervious area. and 50.046 per square foot in excess of 3,000 square feet. shall be paid to the City prior to approval of building permits. X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Traffic Signal Fee area; therefore, a fee as approved by the Mayor and Common Council shall be paid to the City prior to approval of building permits. 46. X A 10' wide easement for landscape purposes shall be dedicated to the City along the South side of Ohio Avenue. the easement and parkway area shall be landscaped. including trees of a size, spacing and type suitable to the Department of Parks and Recreation as replacements for th existing trees being removed. The easement parkway area shall be maintained by a landscape maintenance district. • qTY OF SA BERNARDI~10 PUBI _ WORKa/EIIO_R, CASE TR 11228 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ~ ~ MME - P E ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS - GENERAL 47. X A landscape maintenance easement shall be dedicated over the setback areas of each Tat adjacent to public streets and a landscape maintenance district formed aver these areas to maintain the landscaping in case of owner neglect. ~- X If this project is approved after December 1, 1991, it may be subject to requirements of the State mandated Congestion Management Program (CMP). Under the CMP, new projects which are heavy traffic generators will be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) addressing impacts from the site.. and requiring mitigations. Threshold levels at which projects will be required to prepare a TIA have not been finalized. Status information and details of the CMP can be obtained from the City Traffic Engineer at 384-fi213. Q~_ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CASE ~s"z2~' STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING DATE s~- REVIEWED BY PIXE DEPARTMBNT REQOtRENBNTS GENERAL REQClRE>1EN73s [ 1 Provide one extra xt of cautractton pleas to Building and Safety tw Fin Department use et time of plan check. 49. [ ] Contact Fire Department for specific a detaRed requirements -IMPORTANT. The developer shall provide !or sdagwte Fire Flaw u computedted bin Prevention Bureau. Fin Flow shag be Awed on square footage, eoutroction feature and exposure information u supplied by the developer end may be taken from two hydrents. ACCFSSr [ ] Provide two different route o[ ingress/egnss to the property entrance. The route shell De pevM, all-weather. [ 1 Provide an accau roadway to eaM building for fire apperst~s. Access rwdwey shall have en aD-weedror driving surface of not less then 20-teat of unobstrocted width. [ ] Extend roadway to within 150-feet of all portioro of the exterior vaDs o[ ell single-story DuRdings. [ ] ExterM roadway to within SO-feet o[ the exterior wess of all multiple-story buGdings. [ 1 Provide "NO PARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicle would ponibly redutt the clearance of acttss roadways to less then the required width. Sigu en to red "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" (AD ceps). "M.C. See. 15.16". I 1 Desd-end streets shag not exceed 500-fact in length aM shall have a minimum ~5-toot ndiu tutturound. 50. ~ The name of any new streets (public or private) shell be submitted to the Pin Department for epprovaL SITE: [ 1 All access roads and streets are to be eaetncted and usable prior to combedble construction. [ ] Private fin hydnnta shW be iutallad to protect each Uuilding lasted more then 150-feet from the curb line. No fire hydrant sAOUId be within 40-feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall ba Wet Barrel type, wiM one 2i-inch and one hirre3r outlet. and approved Dy the Fin Department Fire Hydraab an to be protected from damage by providing witabla traffic Darriara. TAe area around the fln hydrant s1Wl be duignated u • "NO PARKING" sane by painting an 8-inch wide, red stripe tae IS-feet in ach dieectlon in front of the Hydrant in wNr • manner that it will not be blocked by parked veldelu. suitable "NO PARKING" signs aro required. 51. ~,~r+` Public fin hydrants a1W1 De peoWdad along streets at 700-feet intervata for ttmmercial and multi-rasidantlal anu and at 500-feet intervab far residential areas. WtaWtiaa sAaB conform to City specifiudoro arut be installed prior to ttmbuetible CpMtNCtien ar storage. BUILDINGt [ The adMess of the stnctun, in sit incH mrmenls, sha8 be ietaLLad on the buRding or in other approved locadan in sucA e manner sa to be visible from the traataga street THe coloe of the numbers shell contrast witH catM of the Wckgrorstd. [ ] Identify each gas and electric meter with the rumbar of tM unit which it services. [ ] Fin eztinguishera must be iutWeO prior to the building being oecr4ied. The minimum rating for any fin extinguisher is 2A 30 B/C. Minimum distribution of fin extinguishers met De wch that no interior part of the building u over 75-tact travel distentt from a tiro extinguisher. [ ] AD buildings, other than rasidentiel over 5,000 square feet, sHaB be provided with en automadc firo sprinkler system, designed t0 NPPA standards. [ 1 Submit plus [or the On protection system to the Fin Department prior to txginning ttrutrucdan an the system. [ 1 Tenant improvements in all aprirrklered buildings arc to be aoprove0 Dy the Ftn Department prior to cawtrucdon. [ 1 Provide en sutomatic fire Wrm (required throughouU. Plan must De approved Dy the Fin Department, priov to instalLdon. [ ] Fin Department connecdan to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shell be required st cueA Rne. NOTE: The applicant must requet, in writing, any eHange in thex or other requirements. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: FPB ]70 7/89 . , ~ ~--. ~ ~ ®.san BemaMino City Water Depargni..t STANDARD REQUIREMENTS review of Plans: # Tr. ?15228 Date: Location: S.E. cor. of MaSnolia S Ohio Aves. Approved: Type of Construction: To subdivide acres into 18 sin¢le resid. lots. Denied: OwnedDeveloper. Corrtinued• ENGINEERING: Name: ~ S l1~S Date: Size of Main Adjacent to the Project /a ~ /~ J~ .~1G~A L!~ 53. 54, ~Z Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. 55. '$ Off-site Water Facilities Required to Meet Peak Fiow Demand. 56. ,~ Comments: 'mil ' ~S~C~ ' ~i~~ 1 Subject to the Rules & Regulations of the Water Department in effect atthe time ofApplication for Water Service. ? This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees/Conditions will be Determined by their Engineering Department WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name:~ ~ /~'b~ Date: 9' ~6 ' g~ ? R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. ? Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. ? Air Gap Required at Service Connection. ? No Backflow Device Required. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name: Date: ~ '-~s 'g~ Industrial Waste Permit Required by Environmental Control Officer. '= Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer. Pre-treatment Required by Environmental Control Offieer. No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed Without Prior Approval. Approved by Environmental Control Officer. SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: ~>L ~t~.~T4 Date: 9~ '~'~ ' 9~ No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. 57, Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the City Water Department for the Amount of ~.OfnPs Gallons Per Day. Equivalent Dwelling Units: ~Q7 Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit ~ 58• ~ProofofPaymentMustbeSubmittedtotheBuilding&SafetyDepartmentPriortolssuanceoftheBuiidingPemtit Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: - IQLc~~~j 'E ~s.^'t~.-~- ~~tt~ ' Y 2~ j - ~,G'e.$ .:~s ~ssm w~rn•~.u C 0 ~t1 ts2z ~ p~acs, x~+TTaa Arw oorrs~rrr somas ~nac ~r~gxr Kauac raNOSC~?Pnac n~ ~ucr?x~a~ . assFSS~rrr nisrxicrs J~Ua+tar, 19ea . ~ - M,_ © ©- • AS.Sf53g2Jf DISl'RICPS - ]ZtRIC+ATION i IANDSC~4Pn 0ON~ST15 IRRIC~ITICN 1. Separate water meter for the irrigation shall be required. Z. Separate electric meter for the irrigation owttrollers shall be required. 3. ValoonlYI M.P.C. oontmllers, with water miser feature, shall be used. Said controllers shall be enclosed fn a "Ia Max" enclosure fran the Valowt CarQany. 4. "Rain turd" traits Eton the Hydro Visar Conoany shall be installed at each oontmller. 5. Valaon Hi-Flaw series, tarots ocmtrol valves, in angle pattern shall be tLSed. ' 6. All irrigation sprinklers in planter areas and small turf areas shall be Rain Bird 1800 series with M.P.R., 8-12 nozzles (Q-H-F). 7. All izrigatia~n sprinklers in median areas shall be 7bro, Super 700 C. B. All irrigation sprinklers in large turf areas shall be 2ltq~son heads with rubber covers. 9. All sprinklers used shall be "pop-tip" type. 10. All irrigation sprinklers shall be cn triple swing joints. 11. All pipe 2" a~ largeS shall be class 315 P.V.C., all pipe lk" and sinaltor shall be P.V.C. sch. 40. 12. Rain Bird 3/4" quick m?~ler valves shall be installed every 100' in raurl plastic valve boxes. LAt~D6CA?E 1. Specific infamnatioui o:s street trees and pant material will depend en project location. Contact City Parks Division far further infaamaticn. 2, Min;n."" p]~,ant sizes shall be a3 follows: TYees: - A. Open recreation areas - 24" box 8. Street trees -All 24" box Shrubs: A. ~ aaibination of 15 gal.lan and 5 gallon sizes f 11:rfgrass: A. Setback areas shall be sod 8. Open st:creaition arena shall be hydroseaded . , ,. Ch:+aa~doover: A. Tntent shall be total coverage at maturity NOTE: Intent and purpose of said plant sizes are to oo:nplete a dense and mature aPP~r~J - 3. A complete soil test with recumiendations shall be required. SanQle results and reoamendatiaais sha12 be an the landscape plans and shall be adhezed to. Three (3) copies of said sample reports shall be provided with the final landscape plans. 4. Setback areas shall be beanad not to exceed 3:1 slope. Said beaming shall be continuous in shape and form. 5. Planter areas shall be a miniml¢ of four feet (4') wide. 6. Ooncsete curbing shall enclose all planter areas. ~ 7. 6" concrete mvwstrips shall separate all turf areas from shrub areas. 8. 6" concrete mowstrips shall separate assessment district from private landscaping. OTS~R 1. ~e following infonnaticn shall be listed in the sheet index and shall be referenced in the plans on a separate sheet. A. City of San Bernardino irrigation section for Assessment Districts. B. City oaf San Bernardino Assessnet:t Districts Maintenance Period. . ~ . A~~xr nisTxrcrs - r~?n~rrrr~,NCE~~,mD rQ+u~rFrtArx~ Ali areas landscaped by the contractor under this project shall be maintained by him for a period of not less than one (1) year from the date of written acceptance for start of maintenance, (365 days). A. Start of Maintenance Period 1. Maintessanae period shah not start until all elements of the project are completed in acaoo:danoe with the contract docztnents. Projects will not be segmented into phases. 2. Foker to rerote controllers shall be established prior 4o the beginning of the neintenanoe period. 3. Zhe maintenance period for the job shall not begin until after the first mowing of the tanrf area. New turf shalt not be mowed until attaining a mininaaa height of lit inches. Man at 2~ inch height using a rotazy mower equipped with a Properly sharpened blade. Notify the Parks Division representative 24 hours prior to this mowirxJ, who wilt make an inspection. 4. Ah~itten aooeptanwe of the landscape architect and the City must be obtained prior to the beginning of the ~ period. Said letters shalt be given to the Parks Division and shalt be on file. 5. If the project maintenanne fails m oontira~ously meet standards Yequired for start of mainta~ance, the mefnbe:nanoe period will bt suspended and will not oontixane until contractor has oon~ected all deficiencies. 6. Contractor shall post a hoed air cash in the amount agreed upon with the Engineering Divisian/~1>tdivisians. Said monies are to guarantee the repaiz os replaoaaent of any deficiencies in the irrigation, landscape and hard surfaces at the end of the one (1) year {365 days) miintenanoe period. 7. ~trac-tar shall sutmit oa~leted as-built dzawfrxJs wh{d~ shall be in the form of one (1) mylar reproducible annd two (2) blue line copies. Actual submittal shall be made to the City's representative. Said drawings shall enoa~ass all irrigation, landscape and hard surfaces. • 8. Parks Division representative shall be the sole deciding party, regarding all acoeptan?oe items, far start of maintenance period. 8. During Maintenance Period 1. Oontractar a~/or designee shalt contact City's represesntative on the first Monday of each month during the one (1) year {365 days) maintenance period. Contact shall be by teieptnne or other means if pre-arranged. Purpose of contact is to review the stata~s of the i ~ ~ ~ project, ~ district portions only). It shall also be the responsibility' of the contractor and/or designee to leave a business address and teleptnne ntmber with the City's representative. 2. During the maintenance period provide all watering, weeding, fertiliz- ing, cultivating and spraying necessary to keep the plants and turf in a healthy growing oa~diticn and to keep the planted areas neat, edged and attrackive. All t=ees and shrubs shall be pincs~ed and pruned as necessary to encourage new growth and to eliminate rank sucker gsvwth. Old wilted flowers and dead foliage shall be imred,iately pinc3~ed or cut off. Do no major tree pruning without proper approval of the City. 3. After Planting and duri:g the maintenance Period, ir? the evert that trees exhibit itnn c3~lorosis syaQtans, apply Flr 136 Geigy or equivalent at manufacturrs's reoomneided rates. 4. During the maintenance period, should the ~nop~.m..,.. of any Plant ~ indicate wealmess, that plant shall be replaced 3mnediately with a new healthy Plant. At the end of the maintenance period, all plant materials shall. be in a healthy, growitxJ condition and spaced as indicated on the plans. 5. Lawns shall be zotary maned at a 1~ inch cut, minimwa weekly. RY]nmunxJ and edgn.ng shall be done in 'Scow` Bays. 6. Damage to Planting areas shall be zepaired immediately and throughout the maintenance Period. 7. Any Planting areas that do not show a pxrnpt establishment of plant material shall be replanted at l0~ay intervals until aooeptad by the City's representative. 8. Miscellaneous Maintenance Items: A. Depressions caused by vehicles. bicycles or foot traffic shall be filled and leveled. Replant damaged areas. g, ~+-ena; *+ate gophers, squitz~els a~ moles, and repair dataage as above. C. ~e p75tplant fertilizing wilt consist primarily of a nitrogen only fertilises progran. Beginning appreocimately 30 days after Planting, ammoniun sulfate shall be applied at the rate of 5 pounds per 2,000 square feet an a monthly basis. _ D. Irrigation shall oonsidere soil, exposure, day and night tertgera- tures and sprinkler output. Conservation of water is a must. 9. Debris and trash sha7.1 be ie?oved frem the site weekly at a minimum. 10. ~uoughout the mair?tenanoe period, all plants shall be maintained in a disease a~ pest free oonditi.on. A licensed pest control cppsator shall be reatined by the oontract~ to apply all pesticides. IIesticide reoemnadations shall be made by a licensed pest control advisor. . . • Q '+~ • C. Fwd of Maintenance 1. Otr? ooupletian of the one (1) year (365 days) raai.ntenanee period the City's representative will inspect the project. Notify the City's representative 2d hours prior m said inspectioi. The aontracta~r and/air designee shall be present during inspection. 2. Confianation that the City has received all submittals and turn- over itensz shall be made. 3. Deficiencies noted durisrg the inspection shall extend the maintenance period wail all are oorr+ected. 4. City's representative shall be the sole deciding party regarding all e~ of maintenance ftens. 5. F~~d of maintenance period shall occur only an written aooEpt<inoe by the City. Said letter shall be on file in the Parks. Recreation and Camiunity Services Department. 6. The Parks Division shall notify the Engineering Department/SVbdivision in writing of said aooeptarne of project far bard/cash release. Q ATTACHEMENT E Q INITIAL STUDY FOR: ~•-~=~` Tentative Tract Mao 1228 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: The subdivision of approxiwately 5.7 acres into 18 single fawily residential lots. Located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Ohio Arenues. SEPTEMBER 18, 1991 PREPARED FOR: Environwental Hish Tech c/o Jaaes Stanclilt d Xilliaw Hauset 3272 North "E" Street. Suite A Saa Bcrnardino, CA 9250$ PREPARED BY: Edalia Olivo-Oowe2 Associate Planner City of San Bernardino Planniag Departwent 300 "D" Street Saa Bernardino, CA 92118 Q. O Project Summary This Initial Study Involves the subdivision of aporoximately i.71 vacant acres into 18 single family residential lots. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Ohio avenues in the RL - Residential Lox General Plan land use designation. The subject site is relatively flat rikh natural slopes ranging up approximately B..iZ. ~ roc of eucalyptus trees is located to the north along Ohio avenue and a ror of olive trees is located to the rest along Magnolia avenue. The surrounding area is characterized Dy vacant residential properties. CRY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND ' ApptigdonNtrmbar. Tentative Tract Map 15228 p~pascrip<bn- To subdivide 5.71 acres i.ntc 18 single family residential lots. Lomtbn. southeast .corner of Magnolia and Ohio Avenues. ~, EnvironmantalConatrainbAraas• Biological Resources Management Overlay (BRM) High Wind; High Fire, Zone C; and Archeblegical Sensitive Area. ~~PlanDasipnauat: RL -Residential Low ZoningDasignatlorG RL - Residenital Low 8. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain arorwn, wham appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. Earth Reaoureea Yrlq the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe . a. Earth nrewntent (art artdlbr ff~ d 10,000 cabin yards ar mon9 b. Developmera arrd/er grading on a sbpe greater than f57L natural grade9 c Owebpment within the Alquisl-Prbb Spacial Studies 2orre as dNirred in Seedorr 120 - Geobgie _ / 3 Seismic, FrOrrre t7, of the Ciry's General PIan1 v d Modifs~tiorr d arty unigw geobgie or physical teatUref e. Dwabpmam wilfwt areas deleted far high potargfd for water ar wind arwion as idemifed in Section 120 - Geobgie 6 Seismid, Fgure 33. of the CRy's General PIan1 L Modification of a charurel, creek or riwR ~L ruwea •.oarov_ n*~w • _ ~"+-- f.s Pb ~yb. a nw ar.xpsnsien a .:istiny industrial, Y.s No AAayp. • other w.s vNridf g.Il.rs$. Troia. I.v.ls on Iq bowing, aalools. h.agh ear. faei8tl.s - ~ dw w.s above an Ldn a B5 d8(a).mrior ? s de(A) iM•r~or+ tproposal muRin: • land ua. as d.sgrnbd on th. vitrrirr an Airport District as id.rRil'wd in th. i~ Compasbl. Us. Zon. {AICUZ) R.pon and :oneg District Maps jjj Ii1M Footrri9 Fin Zon.a A d H, or C as a Land Ua. Zonig DisRrie Map1 s: 1AIiC th. proj.c -,~ ? report or difpos. d hazardous or mieab arO? raOiadOnBTd.O Oo Oa ,~/ ~a.. a hazardow subatanc.s9 _a~ b th. pet.rltial h.aYh/safaty hazards? y g lousing a er.tl. a d.marld reYlatl.n: Could tM proposal, in Cherdsdon Plan as id.llUfi.d in S.eden / » ci?rs c«I«al Pon. molt ire aflte d,at a gnt.r Man n,. rrd- -~ on dt. c«I.ral Plar? _ ~~d.Illand for n.w, parkhq not pm.rrls a einalladon7 ? u traMieT ~,~ hazards o whid.s, bieyeGsts or ,/ rm a nad.rar impovm.ms9 III b71fC Ytrlllln.a ell tll. IosdYrayf rlwr.n ?rasaac_ p,~l rwrso. rnraas_ a,-a © 4 14. wattd.mry rutddbty. of 3lpniflearraa (~.aiat tSOt~ . 7ha Caltomia Enviionmamd ~1! Aa xatn that ~ any d tha fouoarirg oan ba arnwara! ys or ~ aw a spndir~eR7Maec on tlr anvi~onmN+t and an Environm~ai lmpacti Yac IVO ~,tyb. a Dop tM projaet haw tM pataaial b daprada tM quadly d 9fa anvaonrrrart, subatanOaYy ndua tha habitat d er flatr a width apadas, earga a Hdt a wik:ta population to drop baiow d auataadip swats. thraa[atr to sininata a ptaM a aaird oomnaariry, nduoa lha rgmbar err rpbiet tlrs tanpa d a rw or ardarrQaad pfaa a animal a simimta impataot ~ a major Periods d Caliomn hitmry b. Dop 1M prejsA haw tIN potarWal b atdirsva short- tana, b tl» d'sadvantapa d Iorrp~Yns, ~ poaY7 N short-tam impact on 1M awirennNrd h Doer whidr oaaxa in snlaiwh brill. dsirwtw period tldds~fidun~. a ~ ~ allots wa1 into ~/ o. Doan the projaU haw impaels whidr errs irrdhriduapp limited. but mmulattiMy mmida~bla? (A projsC may impact of two a ntara aaparah rsawreaa whaa 1M lmPset oo stir rasaaeas ralMMayr small but wham the atlas d the total d ttrosa Ynpaa. as tits -~ «w6orarwnt is sib) d. Dos firs projaet haw awiionmarrW aMsas which wi nuaa ai6stantial adwraa allapaon human bsinps. ailhar dtra~ly or indiaaly? a oaa~oN of arNtnort~xra. EViYdJAnON AttD tont3t?ntx~ Il~?sunEs (AKadr shoals as naewaeyd fee Attached ~eW are RAl/i0• /11aa lOF~ pf.q ' Q~. • C. DISCUSSIOY QF EVS'IROY`IENTAL ELALUaTIOY ,1~D YITIGaTIO'i 1lEaSORES 1. EARTH RESOI:RCES a) The proposal will result in earth movement of ..approximately 29,199 cubic wards of cut and 23.597 cubic yards of fill balance due to shrinkage factor). Grading in this quantity may potentially result in various impacts related to soli erosion and dust. Rowever. compliance with Public Forks/ EnYineerinY stan3ard requirements for gradinY shall serve to reduce potential impacts to a level of insiYnificance. Specifically, if any development is scheduled to be done between October 15th and April 15th the Engineer shall submit a detailed erosion control plan includinY desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be necessary to protect adjoininY public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding or the deposition of mud or debris which maF originate from the site or result from such development. In addition, dust will be controlled by frequent watering of soil as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Forks/EnYineerinY. b) The proposed project will not result in development and/or Yrading on a elope greater than 151 natural grade. The subject site has a natural grade up to approximately 8.51. 2. dIR RESOCRCES e> The~site is located in a high wind hazard area as identified in the City's General Plan. Standard requirements and conditions of approval pertaining to building construction will be placed at the Development permit stage. 3. FaTER RESOIiRCES a) Drainage Development of the vacant site xill reduce the amount o! impermeable top soil which will increase surface water runofl. Thies surface runoff is considered to be iasi;nificant and will be carried by off-site imDroveme~ts into existing storm drains as required by the Department of Public Aorks/ EnYineerinY. . ~ Q C). ~ Initial Study Tentative Tract ?lap 1528 September 18. 1??i BIOLOGICAL RESOtiRCES ai The subject site is located in the Biological Resources `lanagenent OverlaS District as a result a biological su*:•e~ was conducted on the subject site b~ John rear. Biological Resource Specialist. She biologist concluded that no significant biological resources occur on the site and the removal of the existing weedt• vegetation is got r_~nsidered significant. b,c,d) an arborist report prepared by .lames Brid,Ies identified 48 trees on site and 16 trees on adjacent land. a row of eucalyptus trees ere situated along Ohio avenue and a rov of olive trees are located along ~[agnolia avenue. The Tract has been designed to preserve these trees as such as possible, however some disturbance is necessary to accommodate Blackhaxk Road. The current condition of most trees is rood to dead. Seven trees are recommended for preservation in place or transplanting and the remaiaiaY trees are recommended for removal due to dama>ze or future liability of failure or death. The Parks and Recreation Department had evaluated the arborist report and the trees. The Parka and Recreation Department's recommendations are to preserve all trees not affected by construction in place and to transplant trees affected by construction or replace the removed trees with 36" box native trees at a 2:1 ratio. These trees shall be planted on-site or on public lands in accordance with recommendations and requirements of the Parks and Recreation Department. Compliance with the recommendations oC the Parks and Recreation Department shall serve to reduce all impacts to a level of inaizaificance. 6. La\D I;SE ci The project site is located within Foothill Firs Zone C. Construction is not ptopos~d at this time. however proposed construction shall be in compliance with conditions in ef[ect at the time of approval. 9. TRA~SPORTATIO\':CIRCCLATIOY E.h~ The City's Traffir. Ea>Zineer has determined that the project will not result in increased safet~~ hazards to vehicles. bicyr.lists or pedestrians and that the project will not result in a siznifi~ant increase in traffic volumes on the roadwacs. ~--~, ~ . ~ Q a Initial Study Tentative Tract tap 15228 September 18. 1941 10 8 11. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 UTILITIES a,S,c.d.e,f) all applicable public serr•ice agencies have been given the oDportunit? to comment on the proposal. Comments hate not been received indicating that they will not be able to provide adequate levels ~f service. 12. AESTHETICS a,b) The proposal does not include the construction of anc single family homes at this time. The site is relatively flat. therefore development will not result in the obstruction of any scenic view. Furthermore. Development Review Committee review and approval of elevations and Parks and Recreation Department landacapinY requirements will serve to reduce any potential visual impacts to a level of insignificance. 13. CULTCRaL RESOURCES a,bl The proposal is located in a potential prehistoric or historic archaeoloYical site as identified in Section 3.0, figure 8. pate 3-~ of the General Plan. A cultnral resource review by the archaeoloYical Information Center concluded that no cultural resources are known to exist within or adjacent to the project area. However, if during YradinY or construction such materials are encountered YradinY/construction shall be temporarily stopped. The Planning Department aball be notified, the material shall be evaluated by a qualified archeologist. and appropriate data recovery/protection measures shall be implemented. ~, :n, , _ C7- r• 0. OETERIi0NAT10N ' ' - On tla basis d this irdtlal study, ~, ~t The proposed pojsct COULD NOT haw a sgnilieanta(het on the snvira~mun and a NEGATIVE DECLARA- ~1 TION wiU be pnpred. The proposed project mould haw a sipnEnM effect on tlfe emrironmerd, altlrough there wig not be a sipnilfesnt eMerx in this we beatae tM mmga?iorr measwes described above have taco added ro the project A NEGATIVE DECLARATgN wiY be prepared. TM proposed project MAY haw a siprt~oM eHeG an the emironmerrt, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regtdred. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BEFINARDINO, CALIFORNIA Name and TdN rr Sipnadrce oaa: ~~6 _ /~lY~ ;,.~~ nwwa rsas_as_ mo -- A'fTACt~1EN't F < x ~1 y $t ,' S . m OYUIS~q_S & r i~'. ~ W 'zy ~{i r io Se. G?' i~ ~t s < W .t y g ` ` 'C ~i` 1~ 1 ^ Yf1g r1 1 1 f~1~ ~/ ' ~ i M ~ w~ • 1 , rt~ ~ 1 ! ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1_" ~ ~ w ~ WW a 1 ^ ~, + Y ~ ~ ~ ,• •Y 1 N O a S \ m ~ ~ r " ' 4 ~ ss .J 'ti ~ 31 ~Q o#' '+ -}past ~ ; ," :a+~ . ~ ` "~ ~ s. Y ~ ,} a ~ Q ~ - ~-• It ` ~ ,r- ~ ~ fir' r s t~ a £ 3~ ~ ~~'s'~ Y ~ ~ 1 g 7 ~ 1 -' Q T 3'~ 1 r~:~ .a a a - .3 ~ '- J s3- Y I` 1\ 1 1 ~ . ti's m 1 ~',°~-~_"'.' _t - '~ } 1 ~ r ~ sa~i#~. ¢' i~~i a~ ~ 3~ i~ i a3.eea s 6 ~aS F. M S O M s j s~ ~ ~ 3 c ~' s s ,~ ~y s a~~~~~~~~~ '~^y a33 ~a ~ Z N 33 '~ ~y{ > ~'r'+ ~ P ~~da~~ x u y ~ S ri~s~ r~ ~ 3 Y i ~~~5 ~ G a N~3~3e r a. ~ ~ ~ ~iiE' 4 ~Oi~~ ~ a ATTACHMENT G .r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT rrEl~ # CASE TT 15228 LOCATION HEARING DATE ' ' s ~// !/~ ,/ ~- 1 ~ ti ~- / ,~ ,~,~ -~ / ,, at. ~ .~~6 ~ / ~ / ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~' SITE ~ y/O Y ~ '~ ~ (r j . ^ ~ ' ~, :- /~~ / . ~ r ~/ iE, a ---- ~ -~ - ~// /` ~/ ~,, - ., ,; Q ~ ~ ~ .:- ~ /\ ~ VERDEA,~ONT N ' " ~ ~..''. ~ ,~ ~s w wriso PW/.l/l PMiE 1 OF 1 (4Yq