Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout37-Development Services ,. . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: MICHAEL E. HAYS, Director Subject: Set Workshop for December 6, 1999 at 12:00 noon regarding the proposed Route 30 Improvement Project. Dept: Development Services Date: October 18,1999 ORIGINAL File No. 7.01-39 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None MCC Date: November 1,1999 . Recommended Motion: That a luncheon workshop be set for Monday, Dec:ember 6, 1999,.12:00.... in the Economic Development Agency Bo4idlOOlJitO reeeiw i4foIn ..... fl. .. I the proposed Route 30 improvement project.: ~1~&Y' Contact person: Anwar Wagdy Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Map Phone: 5213 Ward: N/A FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) N/A (A"d n..""rirtinn) N/ A Finance: Agenda Item No. " 1f-37 1~)~)tJ91 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subiect: Set Workshop for December 6, 1999 at 12:00 noon regarding the proposed Route 30 Improvement Project. Backl!Touud: San Bernardino County commuters face daily traffic problems, which require innovative and long-range solutions. The Foothill Freeway (Route 30) was first conceived in 1948, but remained unfunded until 1989 when the voters of San Bernardino County approved the Measure I initiative. Since that time, San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and Caltrans have worked together with affected City staffto plan, design and construct Route 30 through San Bernardino County in phases. The portion of Route 30 east of the 1-215 Freeway was constructed in 1993. SANBAG and Caltrans then started on the westerly edge of the County in 1997 and are progressing toward the 1-215 Freeway with recent phases of construction. The final phase of the project, known as Segment 11, connects the Route 30 Freeway with the 1-215 Freeway in the City of San Bernardino. It is anticipated that Segment 11 will be completed within 3-5 years. Staff feels it is important at this critical juncture of the design process for SANBAG and Caltrans, through their consultant team, to address the Mayor and Common Council regarding the status of the project and discuss the issues which may have an impact on the City's local circulation elements. Therefore, we are recommending this workshop in order to update the Mayor and Common Council on this proj ect. Financial Imoact: None Recommendation: Staff recommends that a workshop be set for 12:00 P.M. December 6, 1999 at the Economic Development boardroom to receive information regarding the proposed Route 30-improvement project. . Route 30 Improvement Project Route 30 Improvement Project (Segment 11) .') ..' CI:rY OF S~ BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Councilwoman Betty Dean Anderson o Council Office Date: October 7, 1999 Subject: State Street Project ~(Q)[?>W Synopsis of Previous Coundl Action: Recommended Motion: To adopt a plan to provide funding for the State Street Project. o ~~C&J~."J Signature Contact Person: Councilwoman Anderson Phone: 5378 Supporting Data Attached: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Ward: Amount: Source: (.&IY"f'_ No.1 (a..... n.cr.;otion 1 Finance: Coundl Notes: o Agenda Item No. ttf1~ JOjll/'19 I. . . FOURTH STREET ROCK CRUSHER ~H 0, ST, -:~.. ,..'" : . "<IS"IE.O October 11, 1999 H. NORMAN JOHNSON, JR. PRESIDENT City of San Bernardino 300 N. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 Dear Madam Mayor and Council Members: At your last Council meeting, I raised the longstanding issue of the State Street extension. I am convinced that an appropriately phased improvement of State Street between 16'" Street and Foothill Boulevard could be the most cost effective and mutually beneficial course of action for the City, the School District, the landowners, and the general public. My Civil Engineer (Associated Engineers) has prepared a preliminary alignment stUdy, which is enclosed. This preliminary study was presented to the City Engineer, Mr. Raymond Casey and his associate, Mr. Thaipejr, during a recent meeting. At that meeting, financing issues were also discussed. I request that the Council direct Staff to review and consider the feasibility of the following proposal: I. An appropriately phased, privately financed design and construction of State Street from 16'" Street to the 5'" Street "cut-off" (as shown on the alignment study), to be completed and dedicated to public use; 2. An appropriate "reimbursement" and/or "construction credit" mechanism be identified and established to eventually reimburse the private design and construction financing; and 3. Any and all existing City public works accounts, funds, etc. which are now designated for State Street (or appurtenant improvements) be identified and applied to this proposal. Thank you for your consideration of this request. I trust you agree that the idea merits further analysis by staff. Very truly yours, sr ~~~~~ H. Norman Johnson, Jr. President P.O. BOX 6490 . 1945 W. FOURTH STREET SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92412 (909) 885-6866 FAX (909) 888-9851 '. Q o o . . ',lrf'kr ~ 2..<" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTEROmCE MEMORANDUM Entmrlloto Record at I e/; ! / q ., To: Michael Hays, Development Services Dir~~~rc::;:.'7:i;;,>"r:m~ Mtg: From: Raymond Casey, City Engineer '!-' . Subject: STATE STREET PROJECT "I Date: 4-'/: "'--"?,..-/',.- / ' . .~ October 14, 1999 Copies: ::I~'::, '-"':'; .~Ji;; Fred Wilson, City Adm;ni~trator Please consider this memorandum a status report for the State Street project pursuant to your request. The current Fiscal Year Capital Improvement Budget includes $712,000 for the State Street Project, of which $342,887 has been encumbered for the engineering and appraisal process. I have reviewed the current budget levels and expenditures on the project. They are as follows: 1) Tom Dodson: Biological Survey 2) Realco (encumbrance): Appraisal Services 3) Ty Lin: Engineering Services (Bridge Plan Review) 4) HTNB: Design Services $ 313 $ 17,250 $ 29,110 $301.460 $348,133 * Total *A portion was encumbered/expended in previous fiscal year(s). (Does not include staff design costs) The City's adopted five-year Capital Improvement Budget (see Attachment" A") provides for no additional funding for this project beyond the current fiscal year. Consequently, any proposed reimbursement would require reprioritizing other project(s) currently identified in the five-year plan. Attachment" A" - Excerpts from FY 1999/2000 Capital Improvement Budget Attachment "B" - 1999/2000 Budget Summ~rjes IF ~c... . /t>/li 177 . . lil~IIJ~llllllglllll~!IIIIIBIIIIII!11111 ~ - CD ~ .... N N "N OOOO~~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOii i ~~ S~i~ ..: .... .NG +> ..... .0 _ oooo~loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooillooo~ ~ 88 . si:e8:e >< ....... ;-S_N f') rz:I : .: N OOOO~IOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOIIIIIOOOOOOI si8 - :e8sisi:e 8 i'i_ -....VSMN N ~ ~ OiooiloaooooooooooOOOOOOOO~IIIOOOOOOOOOOOI - si 88 g::!sig::! - M N_ .... CIS N : .: f? -~~i~i~~~~~~ii~~~i~~~~~iiiiOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~ - S~~i8g~~sim8gsi~;g8R~gtt~esisi ~ - ~ --.... ~~--~ _N_ No-~55 I .:.: 0 .: NN N - .. i "- i ~ ~ ~ ~ j ! i J i! i! ; " ! s i"; s,j l!i C J!I .a l!i jJ a ! I .J ,11- ~ i J II i ! j. j! J I Ii ijl~;.i'i ~ ~li! itii! b! I-Ii -,IJlfl!Jj;jJ I( .j_ ail. ~~~j~~I! tlti .wsll.~~~ Js -sf fll!' tffl!f!!f lillf; liffij!!fJfii~!i~J. .lJimfifilHillmllliUuibllMfd!li .:., ft. '" wi':" Ii ~ ~ Ii.c ~ III ....: _..;: ...: N" .I".. ..!....:...:..2 -' -z -Z..4 ~ __ ~ ~ ~ . ~ 'CItY Of Sari BeniucInO Capltallrnprovememprogrvn 10 Streets and Street Lighting Capital Project Deacrfptlona J PROJECT DESCRlPOON FUNDING COST i - *1. Waterman Ave and Widen northbound and Local Partnership 198,300 Hospitality Ln westbound approaches SB 300 Fund i *2. Pepper-Linden Dr Construct 24' street from Kendall Gas Tax Fund 18,700 to Northpark Blvd I 3. 40th St Widen street from Aae Lane to 112~ Sales Tax Fund 1,525,000 Electric Avenue I 4, Various Locations Repair deficiencies to bridges as Gas Tax Fund 49,700 identified by CaJtrans' annual inspection 1 5. Various Locations Rehabilitate pavement Gas Tax Fund 1,100,000 550,000 1 112~ Sales Tax Fund 550.000 10 6. Various Locations Disabled access ramps COBG** 120,000 *7. State St Design and rights-of-way 112~ Sales Tax Fund 712.000 t acquisition for street from Rancho Ave to Hanford St i *8. Piedmont Dr Street improvement at Baldridge 112~ Sales Tax Fund 72,700 Creek *9. MtVemon Bridge Grade ~tion over BNSF HBRR 10.950,000 I yards 7.200.000 SeismIc Retrofit 3.000.000 I City 750,000 1 *10. VICtoria Ave Rehabilitale pavement from Indian Bingo Fund 389,900 Highland Ave to Indian Reservation I. 11. Palm Ave RehablIlUliIllle pavement from 112~ SaIelI Tax Fund 100.000 Base Line Ave to 20th St t 0 Exhibit "B" t I -Carryover from fY 1....1... "*Subject to AppnwaI of OutsIde Fundlna o z 0 - en z I- W III III I- a: >< I- 0 W :z: l- I- IQ ... 0 W OZ W 1-- e a: ...a: 11I0( I- ZZ Za: Q en 0(11I :z:1II W "Z ...0( I- 00 <C a: I&. ~O I- 0>- en "l- e " C 0 0 W ... I&. en ~ 0 0 Q. a: I&. 0 a: Q. o " tl , I I, I!!!!!ll I 11111I1:: . ,--"1&&. ,~ iii -. I~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I, I: ii ! :- + i l ", 'i 'I ~ - ,I.., ~-,-: "I' ,\~,!"",'rl"ll;I';'i1 . . I '~I I ..." I ' 'r <~__-,~l,-':' '__n I :...;~. 'ill1<' ':1' ['.' I'" ....' " . ,I" I '\" .., '~, _ i: h j .1 " .t.! i ~- " ',1"".',"""1'.' .E i~"j ~I' - ~ ;':1 ,.1 l"!.;I'II~:1 .~ -~ ,:. !,}_ I ~i . '. . "'.'" 'Ii. ' ,,;! I ! ,,';":' I ' I , ,I. '-1 ,,: ",:' 'I : , I' ",. ~., ;'.' , . '~"'. i ," <- ',.' ,.1: Ii, ',!,.,,~I . '::!b""'}:~;;"~ II':; l ,.-., '.: I,j' I " '~~1'::':':,)ll'lll dHhlii I ....:.,,,~,,~IUI ,..' I f1Lli,! ", 1',,1 'I :' ", ; .' I':"~:" ~ " ".1 ~ i: .. ::,n - I /. - - j ~ I'!' " " " I ""1 " . I{i""i' ,,', ,. ,~:,~r~d~ni,I'11~1 '" .' 0','." " 'I ," ,':,"_'.',"11, . . ""\'ij" I"'" :\' ,:.~", l:, 'i'I'1 ..., ' ;,,' .f', ~~ i.... .,. ,~, ~j "I ,I ,1 ,! , .u 'I~." ," ,-, ,-c. J'''','_ ) :"1:1'1.11:'1 "\'I,,,,"'l" ""'\',>;1"''':;'']:';'] ! 'l.[.TI'~'..~}..W1IE'I' " r "'i""'I'" ;!~ :: ~ "~:',~:i~1'.:E ", 'nr"~'''1 , ',i:I!I'<':':~ ~:' ie ,,;\H~ .:::111'; ," ,. ..I"... .,., ,., '. . ~ .., 1'- 'H j ~~ \!~'~~'(I:';i \" I.! 1 r~llj _._:"!""'" "',""....,,_. \ "..-.u "",......,_... "1 'I~ , . ":1""" 'f\" "I': H ',.... ,..,: ", '.1. ' l I;" i ': 1'>';':~i~~"S',: ;"" .,~ .~ 'I' ~ ". \., ...., , , " 1IIIIiil"j'l:llllll!ltillll\IIIII;...IIIII-I!IIII"jl.I!Ii'"' f' ,II " I ' , I" fi ' I I,: ~ r,; ';' , , I I I I ,- ..11 ~ ~ 1'1 // 'I! ii 11\ I~ II '\ ) Ii..,,""" I, ., ;' v: \'111111\< " ,\11, 1;1;.,,1 I'!.. r I ' I li" ' I !.' i 1 i u . c Z L t . . . c Z L . u . c Z L . u . c Z L ~!' <3""'-Llil ~ ~~ ~~o.~! "6 -.:::::.. jO "'! ~ a .11;, ..., -'Iii .. .;I~: .. 5a~: ~ a: ... z: ... => a: U :00:: U o a: .... ... ... a: .... ... z: .... a: => o II- (,':,:\