HomeMy WebLinkAboutRS01-Economic Development Agency
o
o
r
DBVBLOPIIB.r DBPARrIlB.r
OF rm: CIn OF SAIl _lVDIRO
DOUBsr FOR CCRlISSIo./COlIIICIL ACTIOK
From:
KENNETH J. HENDERSON
Executive Director
Subject: CLOSIlIG OF rm: BCOllOMIC
AGDCY IlIIRIIIG rm: WEEK
OF CBRIS1'IIAS
Date:
November I, 1991
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SvnoDsis of Previous r~issionlCnnnpil/C~ittee Actionls):
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReC~Pnded IIotionls):
lC.-...ftv Develo...ent C~iasion)
IIMIO.:
That the Community Development Commission approve the closing.
of the Economic Development Agency/DeVelopment Department to
facilitate the installation of firesprinklers and accomplish
certain operational savings.
Admi<:Jf:.tor
J. ERSOK
J:zecutive Director
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact Person(s):
ICen Henderson
Phone:
5081
Project Area(s):
NIA
Ward(s):
NIA
Supporting Data Attached:
Staff ReDort
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: * NIA
Source:
NIA
Budget Authority:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C~issionlCouncil Kotes:
ICJH:lmp:0253F
COIlMISSIO. IlEETIKG AGENDA
lIeeting Date: 12/16/1991
Agenda Item Bomber: f5..:....L.
,",.~
o
o
IlBVBLOPIIIIT DBP.utn..nr
STAFF RIPORr
CIO.4ft. of ~h. .le.ftft,...4 Ie. D.....l".......t bl!Dl!9
Darf",. the Weelt of .I!h.i......
On July 29, 1991, Mary Fifield, Administrative Intern for the City of San
Bernardino aubmitted a report to Shauna Clark, City Administrator
reaardiq the c10siq of City Hall dUr1q the week of Christmas. In the
report Ma. Fifield detailed some of the cost saviqs to the City such as
buildina operations and payroll. For valid reasons not related to the
merits of Ms. Fifield's findiqs the City chose not to endorse this plan
for the fo110wiq reasons:
1. This is a lUUldatory meet and confer item with the City's baraainina
units.
2. The City offers yar10us services on a twenty-four (24) hour basis and
must continue to do so.
The Bconomic DeveloPlllent Alency is, in function, and implementation a
workiq arm of the City, coordinstiq closely with it in the areas of
economic develoPlllent, develoPlllent, housiq and c_ity develoPlllent.
However, the Alency is technically a separate entity from the City, has no
baraainiq unit and essentially provides task/discipline oriented services
to the public which do not require twenty-four (24) hour or even daily
continuance or continuni ty .
ExIdlg Office SchecUe,
1992
~ed Office SchecUe
1991
1991
1992
I ,."
..,.".
1 2 3 ~ 5 I 7
I I 18 11 12 13 I~
IS 1I~" 20 21
2213 .V.
alii
-
'.'~'"
1 2 3 ~
.17 llOll
12 II 1~ 15 II 17 II
1120212213205
.V..lII31
- 'III
,.,.,"
123~'17
I I 10 II 12 131~
IS II 17 JlJU!l21
IM~.
-
'.'~'"
I 2 3 ~
.1711011
12 13 I~ 1111 17 II
1120212213205
.V..lII31
0- Office clcised
KJH:XMC:1aa:0311B
COIIIISSIOB IIBB1'IlIG AGDDA
KeetiD& Date: 12/16/1991
Alenda Item Bo: is -I
o
o
DEVELOPIIDr DBP~.c STAFF IBPORT
Closiq Bc~c Development qency
Duriq Christaall Week
December 16, 1991
Page llullber -2-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the Agency is authorized to close Tuesday, December 24,
Wednesday, December 25, and the foUowiq week Tuesday, December 31, 1991
and Wednesday, January I, 1992. It is proposed that the qency offices
close from December 25, 1991 through January I, 1992. The Agency would be
open tueSday, December 24, 1991 and closed for the next six (6) days.
Four (4) of the six (6) days are paid holidays, leaVing two (2) days in
which the employees would have the option of usiq vacation, floating
holidays, or 1Dlpaid leave for these days.
The closing of Agency offices for two (2) additional days, would result in
a saviqs of approximately $3,567.00. More specifically, $675.00 of this
am01Dlt is attributed to reduced buildiq operationa overhead. Because
part-time employees would not let paid for these two (2) days, the Agency
would save an additional $392.00 in salaries. The Agency is also having
sprinklers inatalled during that week. Adoption of the form motion would.
allow the workers to use non-overtime hours and days to install the
sprinklers duriq the week, thus enabliq the Agency to save approximately
$2,500.00. Actual saviqs could be even more when employee's leave
without pay requests are calculated in the new saviqs to the Agency.
This is normally a slow time fo the year for public requests of the
Agency, and it would not cause any additional inconvenience to the
public. For example, in specific rather than general user services, it is
rare for a client to rehabiliate their home during the Christmas holidays,
and businesses that the Agency works with have adopted their own or
similar employee release plans.
On December 12, 1991, the subject item was reviewed and discussed by the
Redevelopment CODlDittee. The cODlDittee endorsed the form motion and
1Dlderscored the appropriateness of the revised schedule to facilitate and
accommodate inatallation of the fire sprinklers. The avoidance of
overtime and disruption to the workplace will result in dollar savings to
the Agency. Such action would tend to even mitigate change orders due to
1Dlexpected problems and still allow the construction to be completed
within the approved budget. Full confidence in this capability would be
questionable without the reschedUling of office hours.
KJH:KMC:lag:03llE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COIMISSIO. MEETIlIG AGDDA
Meetiq Date: 12/16/1991c
qeuda Itea .0: R.~ - J
.
o
DBVBLOPIIEII1' DBP.Aa.um..l STAFF IlBPORr
Clos1D& Bccmc.ic DeYeloIa8Dt Aa~
Dur1D& Christ11a8 Week
December 16, 1991
Pase ~er -3-
o
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff recommends adoption of the form motion.
.........:1:11 J. OK, BD!cutive Director
Deyelopeent De taent
KJH:KMC:lag:0311E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COIMISSIOK IIBBTIlIG AGDDA
Meeting Date: 12/16/1991
Aaenda It_ Ko:
(.'5 - ]
.