HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-072
..
~ ,
-(
.t., .
1
RESOLUTION NO.
88-72
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF A TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH THE OFFICE
3 OF TRAFFIC SAFETY RELATING TO A TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE INVENTORY.
4
5
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Administrator, Director of Finance,
6
and Director of Public Works/City Engineer of the City of San
7
Bernardino are hereby authorized and directed to execute, on
8
behalf of said City, an agreement with the State of California,
9
Office of Traffic Safety, relating to the provision of funds to
10
finance the preparation of a Traffic Control Device Inventory,
11
\'Jhich agreement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit IIAII and
12
incorporated herein by reference as fully as though set forth at
13
length.
14
SECTION 2. The agreement shall not take effect until
15
fully signed and executed by both parties. The City shall not be
16
obligated hereunder unless and until the agreement is fully
17
executed and no oral agreement relating thereto shall be implied
18
or authorized.
19
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was
20
duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
21
Be r n a r din 0 a t a _3e gul ~___._ me e tin 9 the reo f, h e 1 don the 7 t h
March , 1988, by the following vote, to-wit:
22 day of
23
24
25
26
27
28
1/25/88
AYES: Council r1embers _Estrad~ Flores, Mandsl~y, _
_.l1 iI!_Q.!:"-L- Mi lIe r
NAYS:
_~on_~____.______.________..______.___
A B S EN T: __C oun c U--.l1ember s_Re..iJ..lL. -Enp_e: T ,1]0 1 n ITL_________
~J
-------. ~//~ 1 ~.&b
T-city C erk
;,-
...,
. '... .
traffic Safety Project Agreement
1
2
3
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this f!~day of
March
, 1988.
()'
/: I ~/} .~< ..
LP A,V~..(fit - < // ". ^--~y
~1 a y 0 r 0 f t ~ C 1 t y/ 0 f I S a n B e r na r din 0
4
5
6 Approved as to form and
legal content:
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1/25/88
- 2 -
EX H I 8 I 'I M'
f>?-72--
. .
ars USE CNt Y
State of California PROJEC~ ~ER
Business, Transportation, Housing Agency PSP 00..
OFFICE or TRAFFIC SAFETY
REVISION NUMBER
DATE
TRAFFIC SAFETY E'ROJECT AGREEMENT
PROJECT EUI:GET ESTIMATE
Fiscal Yr. Amount
PAGE 1 (To be Comleted
. PROJECT TITLE
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE INVENTORY
s
s
s
s
2. NAME OF ~PLICANT AGENCY.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Total S
AGENCY CNIT ro HANDLE PROJECT
Public Works Department/Engineering
From:
PROJECT PERlOD
Month -' Cay
3 1
7 1
- Year
88
91
4.
To
~. ?RCJECT CESCRI?TICN \ Swrmarize che 9roposed ?roject ?lan covering the cojeai ves, metJ'lod
of ?rocedure, evaluation and end ?roduct in a~proximately 100 words) ~
With the aid of a co~sultant, an inventor~ of all traffic control devices in the City will
be completed.. A vld~o log and c~mputerlzed record system will be developed and maintain
ed by the Traff~c Sectlon for use ln analysis of traffic concerns, generation of work
orders for repalr and/or replacement of deficient signs throughout the City. Also to be \
used by the Traffic Section for surveillance programs and monitoring the effective~ess
of the system, City-wide.
Signat"..lre
Title
r..:NDER THIS ~GREEM.ENT SHALL NOr EXCEED S
_ ~he ?rovlsicns en ~~e ceverse sice r.ereoi ccnsc~t~ce a ;a~
of this aareement
I 3. ACTECRIZnK; CFF!C:AL CF .;PPL:~~T ';G2-~CI
(714) 384-5025
~hone : :tame :
Address:
(714) _~g4-S05l
Evlyn Wilcox :,..one:
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
. ~ A
~ t j) 0t~
Signature ,.1 .t.{//v/ /' /1/ /
Title Mayor e3-'?- pr
6. ?EDERAL :C~IDS ~LCCATED
I. ACCE~~~ CF CCNDITICNS
..\. ?~C;E~ :rREC'XR
~ame: Roger G. Hardgrave
..\ddress: 300 N.
San B
....
-.
?!SCAL :R ~C:CL~ING CFFIC:AL
J. CFFICE ~L~CRI:~ :": ?-EC~:~fE ? .~~~s
~: Warren Knudson
:~:
Finance Department
:itle: Director of Finance
Address: 300 N. II D II Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
?hcne:
;.. T:'ACEM~ITS
?ro:ec~ :escri~tion
Adm. 3upport & Contributicn
~t.ailed 3udget Sstirrat.e
3udcet ::acra ti ve
3Cliedule A
Schedule A-l
.schedule 8
Schedule 3-1
Initial ::va.ll.2 t:..cn Ca c.a :crm 3c.~ecu:..e-
Certificac.ion, California
Traffic Safety ?~~rarn (C1:'S-33)
~S-38 (?~V JI=6)
/ ..
~ t
.
i
! .
0 t
J
.
2<
o z
- ~
I- 0
~ ~.
I- ~
20
lU ~
_ 0
IE ~
o ~
w
..I CD
( ~
2 en
o ~
_ 0
,'(9 ~
W ~
IE g
.",.
u)
ex:
~
~
-'
u..
. .
......--
o
o
o
.
.....,
(1)3
I-
Z
l&.J
C
-
U
U
~
u..2
o
a::
l.LJ
CD
:E
=:)
z
TRAFFIC
ACCIDENTS
4926
5
~.
~9
4065
397S 3949 r-'"
I '
I I
I
I I
0
I UJ I
I ~ I
I.U
I ~ ,
0
, a': ,
a..
1 I
I I
2710
p;.....-
..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J
<[ <[ <[ <[ <( <[
t- t- t- t- t- .rnS t- 1998
0 0 0 0 0 0 --I
.... .... .... t- t- .... ~I
~I
~I
0
1382 ~I
1264 ~ lli..7 1332
----
-
1028
-
>- >- >- >- >- >-
a: Q: Q: a:: Q: Q:
::) ~ :) :) :) :J
..., .., ., .., .., ...,
Z Z Z Z Z Z
- - - - - -
4
I
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
(8 Mas)
FIGURE 2
S-..-- . - ""
\..,:-'.:....;~...:. r-\
?age 1 of J.
-
.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
.
General:
The City of San Berna.dino is located approximately 60 miles east of ~os Angeles
and is the J.acgest City in the County of San Bernardino. It is the County Seat as
well. It has a population of 140,000 and a total area of 57 squace miles. Located
in the foothills to the San Bernardino mountains at an elevation of 1100 feet, it
is the hub of the interstate freeway and rail system, with the :ntersection of
Interstate 10 and Interstate 215 at the southwest corner of the City.
Streets and Highways:
Route 30 and 330 serving the resort communities of Lake Arrowhead and Big Bear pass
through the City. With the completion of sections of Route 30 and 330 to link them
and provide interchanges with 10 and 215, the City will be circled by freeways much
in the manner of eastern beltways. The City has a total of 550 miles of streets to
maintain and appcoximately 27 mi~.es of state coutes and freeways within the City
limits. Presently, there ace 178 signalized intersections, approximately 6500
tcaffic signs, 2500 pavement legends and over 100 miles of striped streets.
Operating Departments:
Within the Department of Public Woeks, the Traffic Section, headed by the Traffic
Engineer, has the responsibility for the review, analysis and establishment of
traffic control devices, speed J.imits and all matters related to traffic. The City
uses a Traffic Safety Committee as an advisory body to the Mayor and Common Council
and the Tcaffic Engineer is the chief staff member for this cO~Jittee. The Section
is staffed by fouc persons -- the Traffic Engineer, the Assistant Traffic Engineec,
an Engineecing Techrlician II, and an Engineecing Technician I. The staff and
equipment required for installation of signs and stri~ir~ ace now under the Public
Services De~actment, and while the ~caffic Engineec prepares the wock ordecs for
signing and striping, the \lork is pecformed by another Department. The tcansfer of
this cesponsibiJ.ity to the Traffic Section is in progress. ~1aintenance of the
tcaffic siCJna~_s:s accomplished by a 5-man section in the Pub::.ic ~'Jocks Depactment
and \Jock c."'c.osely \Ji th the Traff ic Eng ineec.
pcobler.l:
Present;.y, theee is no compJ.ete and accur-ate cecocd of the ~_ocation, nurabee, tlpe
and authocization for the insta:~_ation of traffic contro~ devices :n the city.
there is no program for surveillance of the existing controls, rnonitor-ing the
effectiveness and suitability of the in-place contcols or any progran foe the :e-
pair and/or replacement of substandard or defective devices. Repairs and/or re-
placement is accomplished by citizen reports of missing dev:.ces and no records are
rnade of the nur;1ber of t irnes cep~.aced, oc cond: tion of the devices. Accident
investigations cequiee enocmous amounts of tirne and reseacch to determine where
the s~gn is to be p:aced, :f it was authorized, if it was indeed installed, and
when it \Jas ~ast checked. Work ordecs ace sent to the cequired depactrnent foe
action, but no cecocd is made of the comp::'etion date or any subsequent cepaic
dates.
In a study completed by the Institute of Transportation Studies, U.C. Berkley, it
was reported that the traffic signs in the City \lere among the ~oorest the team had
observed in over 100 cities surveyed. Accidents in the City are detailed in 2iguce
OTS-38b (R.v 5/82)
S~~~~~~~ A
?age 2 of j
. .
-
.
PROJECT DISCRIPTIOM
.
2 and reflect an accident rate 52% above the state~wide averages. In this ~ame
report, it was stated that the Ci~y.of San Bernardlno ranked 30th on the llst of
high accident cities of the 450 cltles rated.
Attempts to Solve the Problem:
In the past, attempts to require the Public Services Department to complete a sign
inventory have not been successful. Lack of manpower and the enormity of the pro-
ject, as well as the lack of technically oriented staff or a means to accomplish
the program, have prevented them from even attempting a solution. Traffic Section
staff, limited to four members, is unable to provide the required time or manpower
to assist.
Each budget year, manpower and funds are requested for this work but budget con-
straints prevent this work from being budgeted. Tracking of the work orders is
complete in the Public Works Department but there is no comparable tracking in the
Public Services Department (the department performing the work)
Project Objective:
1. To complete an inventory of all traffic control devices in the City within a
one-year period.
2. To have this list available on a centralized computer record that will allow
the periodic inspection, management and reporting of the condition of the
inventory and to have this system operational and on line within 2 years.
3. To be able to review the existing inventory, evaluate the installations and
improve those that are substandard or do not provide the level of protection
desired.
4. Improve the traffic safety record by reducing the number of accidents or injury
accidents in the City.
5. To reduce liability by having current information on the installation date,
authorization for installation and conditions of the signs/striping available
and in acceptable form for court documents.
6. To upgrade deficient signs and striping discovered.
7. Improvements to the system, reduction of accidents, ongoing inspection and
evaluation are long term goals to be immediately implemented and continued
for the project life.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
SCHSDULE: A
Page 3 of 5
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Method of Procedure:
PHASE I
The City proposes to hire a selected consultant firm to prepare a video log of the
existing street system, to complete an inventory in an acceptable computer format
to be run on an IBM PC or compatible system and to provide a City selected computer
system, video equipment, software and completed inventory. The City would monitor
the system, update and maintain the inventory and update the video using the provided
equipment and existing section vehicles and staff. Programs for reporting, work
order development and maintenance scheduling will be developed and implemented.
PHASE II
Maintain records system with monthly updates
PHASE III
Implement improvements to traffic control devices inventory.
Work would be proposed to be phased a~ follows:
ESTIMATED CALENDAR DATES
TASK
S ta rt
Complete
1. Send letters of interest to list of 03-01-88
consultants for services (4 weeks)
04~01-88
2. Screen letters of interest and prepare 04-01-88
request for proposals for no more than
five (5) consultants. (4 weeks)
05-01-38
3. Interview and select consultant. 05-01-88
(2 weeks)
05 -15-88
4. Consultant to prepare video log of signing 06-01-88
and striping existing in the City system.
Provide a duplicate set to the City for
immediate use. (9 months)
5. Secure the computer system for the 05-15-88
inventory and investigate the mainten-
ance and reporting programs (2 months)
03-01-89
07-15-38
6. Load the inventory onto the computer 03-01-89
system in implementing the completed
system. ( 6 weeks)
04-15-89
7. Maintain records of before and after
accident rates and new improvements.
(ongoing)
04-15-89
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
S~~::'~'-J~::' f4.
Page 4 0 f J
.
pROJECT DISCRIPTIO'
.
8. Prepare priority list of deficient
installation and establish program
for replacement/repair to bring present
stock into legal compliance.
9. Complete quarterly and yearly reports
of effectiveness, accomplishment of
upgrades and litigation defenses.
10. Secure staff to maintain system.
04-15-39
07-15-89
10-15-90
07-10-91
Method of Evaluation
The evaluation of the project will be measured by its compliance with the tasks
defined in the project objective section, that is:
1. Is an inventory for all traffic control devices in the City completed within one
year":
2. Is a computer system operational that will give details on the date of installa-
tion and authority to install devices and provide a useful tool for management
within the City within the two years proposed.
3. With the inventory in place, be able to identify deficient devices and evaluate
existing conditions.
4. Obtain a measurably reduction in the accident rate as it can be related to
control devices and their installation.
5. To obtain an improvement in the condition of the striping and signing in the
community and reduce the number of complaints.
6. Obtain an improvement in the perception of the citizenry as to effectiveness
and usefulness of the control devices and striping. To be measured by reduced
complaints and greater respect of the control devices.
.7. Determine the Consultant's compliance with the intent of the contract documents
and his performance of the tasks to be listed within it.
8. To secure a more responsive Traffic Section and increase staff to meet the needs
of the growing community.
'~easures of the effectiveness of the system will be by the increase or the
anticipated decrease in the accident rates, the reduction in complaints and a higher
rating on both accident rate and sign legal conformance by rating agencies. The
number of deficient signs repaired or replaced yearly will be available. Additionally,
the Traffic Section will have an ongoing monitoring system and will be able to coor-
dinate the high accident locations with the sign inventory. The evaluation by the
Traffic Section will be measured by the effectiveness of new signing, the modifications
or upgrades to current signing and an over-all improvement in traffic safety within
the City.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE: A
. 5 Page 5 of -
.'
.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
.
Evaluation will be performed by the Assistant City Engineer and the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer for this project. The responsibility for the control of
the consultant, operations of the Traffic Section and the reporting on the effective-
ness shall reside with these individuals. They are in a position that allows the
direction of the activities and the approval of payment for services rendered.
STATEMENT OF INTENT
The City intends to:
1. Provide the contract administration for the consultant portion of the work.
2. Set the goals and program parameters.
3. Provide the necessary staff to support the program once established.
4. Update of the video log of signs and striping and the computer records.
5. Monitoring of the system and the evaluation of the effectiveness will be the
responsibility of the Traffic Section.
6. The City will perform the signing and striping with the intent to consolidate
the responsibility for the work in the Traffic Section.
7. The City has and will maintain the vehicle for the video log updating and will
maintain this equipment and attempt to upgrade staffing to meet future needs.
8. Allocate sufficient man hours of work to maintain the system and City intends
to provide for this in the yearly budget for the section.
9. Intends to complete the project in a timely manner and complete all tasks
identified within the project.
OTS-38b (R8v 5/82)
. \.
SCHEDULE A-l
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT STATEMENT - Explain what type of priority this
project has in your jurisdiction.
On May 7, 1987, the project preliminary proposal was presented to
the May 0 ran d Com; non C ') u r! C i 1, was a p pro' v e d by the Leg i s ra t i v e bod y ,
and staff was authorized to proceed with the request. The final
agreement will be presented to this body for approval. The Public
Works Department is the originating source of the request and is
fully supportive. The traffic division of th~ police Department has
referred to the ITS study report and has been supportive of all
efforts to reduce the accident and injury accident rate in the
community. The project is recognized as important and necessary but
no specific priority has been assigned. Present budget constraints
prevent the assignment of this project to existing staff. The Mayor's
Traffic Safety Committee is also aware and supportive of this pro-
gram or any program that would promote traffic safety and could
potentially reduce accidents in the City.
AGE~CY CONTRIBUTIO~ - Explain what services or funds are being contrib-
uted by your agency in support of this project.
The City will provide the coordination, supervision and administration
for this project and all required staff work for the ongoing operation
and maintenance of the system. It is estimated that the following
will be the salary contribution during the project period.
Triffic Engineer -
Supervision and Coordination
5~ of yearly salary and fringes
Assistant Traffic Engineer -
Supervision and Coordination
30% of yearly salary and. fringes
Ongoing Costs for Maintenance and Opera-
tion of the system, support staff of
Tech I and II
Finance - Accounting and Payroll
Contract Administration, 1st year only
. Vehicle Maintenance & Operation
Aerial photos
* 1st Year
Succeeding Years
S 3,500.00
per y~ar
$ 12,700.00
per year
$ 8,OaO.00
per year
$ 1,000.00 per year
.$ 12,000.00
S 500.00 per year
$ 30,000.00 1 s t Year
$ 67,700.00
S 25,700.00
OTS-38c (Rev 5/82)
*There will be no program income generated as a
result of this program.
ADDENDUM
Project No.
This project is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. Personnel funded under this project shall be
dedicated in total to traffic law enforcement.
EXCEPT:
a. In the case of a criminal offense committed
in the officer's presence.
b. In the case of response to an officer in
distress.
c. In the case of a riot where all available
personnel must be committed.
2. Equipment funded under this project is subject
to same requirements as '1 above.
3. Fiscal year funding will be at the level shown
under Project Budget Estimate and Schedule B,
Detailed Budget Estimate, provided that project
activities and personnel are maintained at the
same level during the total term of the project.
OTS-23 (Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE B
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE
Page T
FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES TOTAL COST
COST CATEGORY FY-l r -PY - 2 FY-~ I FY-4 TO PROJECT
:>-q.-tli1 to lU-l":89 to lU-l-~U to
A. PERSONNEL COSTS Q-30-RQ Q_~n-Qn 9-1-ql
Positions
and Salaries
I
Employee Benefits
,
Total
.Personnel Costs 0
B. TRAVEL EXPENSE
\
~
:
Total
Travel Ex~ense .0
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Consultant Service $30,000 $35,000
Total Contractual
Services $30,000 $35,000 $65,000
OTS-38d (Rev 5/82)
SC~C:DULE: 8
DETAILED BUDGET.ESTIMATE
- paqeL,
FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES I TOTAL COS'
COST CATEGORY FY-l FY-2 FY-3 I FY-4 TO PROJEC'
D. NON-EXPENDABLE 5-1-83 to 10-1-89 10-1-90
PROPERTY 9-30-89 9-30--90 7-1-91
Computer System 3,500
Printer 1,500
Video Camera 1,200
Playback unit 1,200
To ta 1
Non-Expendable 4,700 2,700 7,400
Procertv
E. OTHER DIRECT
COSTS
Software 2,000
Total
Other Direct Costs 2,000 2,000
F. INDIRECT COSTS
Total
Indirect Costs - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - .. 0 -
TOTAL BUDGET ESTI:-1ATE
All Cateaories 34,700 I 39,700 74,400
OTS-38e (Rev 10/84)
SCHEnULE B-1
BUDGET NARRA~IVE
Personnel Costs
All personnel costs are part of the City's participation in this project.
Consultant Services
Depending on the timing of the program, it is possible that the consultant may complete
the project in one fiscal year, however, the costs have been split into two fiscal year
programs to allow for the time lag in processing. Cost is estimated on the basis of the
area of the City, the miles of roads arrd streets and the estimated number of devices to
be inventoried.
Non-Expendable Property
Costs for an IBM compatible system, software, video recorder, playback unit and support
software have been estimated in the budget. Aerial photos are a part of the City's
contribution.
Other Direct Costs
An estimate has been made for software for various aspects of the project not included
in the consultants portion.
OTS-38f (Rev 5/82)
.'. ...
CJ
~
::)
Q
11II
::
~
i
2
.. ..
,.,
~
8 u
G
Q
..c::>>
,.,
:>.
.. -;~
! I "'rX
.,G\ ..0
...
~ ,.,
...
.. G
~~
C'"
.. ..
,.,
=
" '"
'" ~
.. ..
,.,
~
8 u
c!
..c::>>
,.,
} :>.
-;~
C I '" G
en
,,~
... ..c::>>
>e ,.,
...
N .. G
'" =
Co::l
C..,
- ..
,.,
=
" '"
.., "
z
.. - I
,.,
~
8 u
G I
0
-0
,.,
~ >.
c -;~
C I .., >>
en
,,~
G- -0
)II ,.,
...
,., - G
'" =
Co::l
C..,
.. - I
,., I
=
" '"
'" "
Z
at
=
0 ~
...
~
.. fa " lC :J
;. ~ ~ ~ ."
'" ra ~ ... c '"
.... 0 11 en CJ 0
= = .. Q.I ... ~
0 15 .. .. ."
~ C .. '" ~ ."
g. ... " ~ ~ " ~ ;j
~ ::i ... e- N -
<II Q~ ~ g" <II e -
Co. Co. I! Co. at Q ~ :: 11 0
.CJ .. CJ 101 <II (J ",' I - ~ I U w
Q, ~ Q, 11 o g. ~ z .... ... ~
(4 Z J: ~CllZ ~ CJ ~ 0 C ."
'" ~ =.... 0 c = w .... Q"
'" ." 0 .J '."'0- ~ " 0 .J Q.I C - lZl Q.I ~ C
~ C ~~ :: ~ w c B ... IV B ." ~ ....
.T~ ~ &~.... e- IV ~ Co. ~ IV g. >< 0
41..:2- "'" . 8 c e- o 8 ~ 0 u .. tJ
~ woe e- e- '" g. ." \00 U en
.... .. = w 0 w 0 C Q.I
tJ Co. ~ g. .... Q.I .... ~ -
tJ C :> c ...
c III C III C 2:
0 Z .J >- 0 Z ..J >-
a. e-tn
0:2- .. Q,~(IJ ~ClI:CZ~tn ~ ClI: C Z ~ ~ ClI: .c: z e-
o :2...
Q = ... Q, ~ tn
c
..
!
!
~
..
c
3
-<
~
oJ
C
~
..
~
:z
~
I~
..J
o
=
o
~
1:1
en
t
G
III
w
G
>
G
ClI:
=
o
III
c:
o
....
~
tJ
::l
\00
.w
(4
c:
...
N
~
"
II'
>
~
~
~
CD
~
I
tn
e-
:,)
.
CERTIFICATION
CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ASSURANCE
Pursuant to the requirements of Title VI provisions of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, the certifying applicant acting through its
chief administrative officer, desiring to avail itself of the
benefits of Chapter 1, Title 23, United States Code, and as a
condition to obtaining the approval of the Secretary of Transpor-
tation and Governor of California of any highway safety projects
as provided for in Title 23, United States Code, Section l05{a),
hereby gives its assurance that all provisions of Equal Oppor-
tunity Assurance with regard to the Highway Safety Program will
be complied with fully.
MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
(l) "Policy. It is the policy of the Office of Traffic Safety
and the certifying applicant that minority business enter-
prises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum
opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this
agreement. Consequently, the MBE requirements of 49 CFR
Part 23 apply to this agreement."
(2) "MBE Obligation. The certifying applicant or its contractor
agrees to ensure that minority business enterprises as
defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to
participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided
under this agreement. In this regard the certifying appli-
cant and a~l contractors shall take all necessary and
reasonable steps in accordance with 49 eFR Part 23 to ensure
that minority business enterprises have the maximum oppor-
tunity to.compete for and perform contracts. The certifying
applicant and its contractors shall not discriminate on the
basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award
and performance of DOT-assisted contracts."
OTS-33 (Rev 5/82)
(over)
CERTIFICATION
CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ASSURANCE
Pursuant to the requirements of Title VI provisions of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, the certifying applicant acting through its
chief administrative officer, desiring to avail itself of the
benefits of Chapter 1, Title 23, United States Code, and as a
condition to obtaining the approval of the Secretary of Transpor-
tation and Governor of California of any highway safety projects
as provided for in Title 23, United States Code, Section 105(a),
hereby gives its assurance that all provisions of Equal Oppor-
tunity Assurance with regard to the Highway Safety Program will
. be complied with fully.
MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
(1) "policy. It is the policy of the Office of Traffic Safety
and the certifying applicant that minority business enter-
prises as defined in 49 CFa Part 23 shall have the maximum
opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this
agreement. Consequently, the MBE requirements of 49 CFR
Part 23 apply to this agreement."
(2) "MBE Obligation. The certifying applicant or its contractor
agrees to ensure that minority business enterprises as
defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to
participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided
under this agreement. In this regard the certifying appli-
cant and all contractors shall take all necessary and
reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to. ensure
that minority business enterprises hav~ the maximum oppor-
tunity to compete for and perform contracts. The certifying
applicant and its contractors shall not discriminate on the
basis of race, color, national origin, or se~ in the award
and performance of DOT-assisted contracts."
OTS-33 (Rev 5/82)
(over)