The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About41-Planning and Building c,.,,"~"':; ":-;,_.c.^ CITY' OF SAN BERN~DINO - REQUEST ~ COUNCIL ACTION From: Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director Dept: Planning and Building Services Date: September 30, 1991 Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 90-09, Parcel Map No. 14067 and Conditional Permit No. 91-07 Use Mayor and Common Council Meeting of October 21, 1991, 2:00 p.m. Synopsis of Previous Council action: The northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "I" Street was designated IL, Industrial Light upon adoption of the General Plan on June 2, 1989. At their meeting of September 17, 1991, the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 90-09, Parcel Map No. 14067 (with Conditions) and Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 (with Conditions) and denial of the request for sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption. Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed and that: 1) the resolution for General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 be adopted; 2) the Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 14067 and Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 be adopted; 3) Parcel Map No. 14067 be approved (with Conditions); 4) Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 be approved (with Conditions) and that the request for sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption be denied. r&/ Signature Asst. Di rector Supporting data attached: Staff Reoort Ward: 384-5357 3 Contact person: Larrv E. Reed Phone: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Descriotion) Finance: Council Notes: /11 o o General Plan amendment No. 90-09, parcel No. 14067 and conditional Use permit NO. October 21, 1991 paqe 2 Map 91-07 14067). In both instances, a Negative Declaration was recommended. No comments were received during the repective public review periods. PLM1NING COMMI:SSI:ON R!!t!nMMEHD~TI:ON The Planning commission considered GPA 90-09, CUP 90-07 and Parcel Map 14067 at their meeting of september 17, 1991. Their recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council regarding GPA 90- 09 is to adopt the Negative Declaration and the amendment request to change the land use designation to CG-1, commercial General. Regarding CUP 91-07 and Parcel Map No. 14067, the planning commission recommended that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Negative Declaration, approve Parcel Map No. 14067 (with Conditions), approve CUP 91-07 (with Conditions) and deny the request for sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The planning commission recommended denial of the request for the off-site sale of alcohol for the following reasons: 1.) overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licenses in the ABC census tract: 2.) the potential of the off-sale alcohol license to bring additional crime to the area: 3.) the close proximity of the facility to an elementary school (Urbita Elementary is approximately 81 feet to the northwest): and, 4.) the close proximity of another off-sale establishment (#1 store, located 119 feet to the south across I:nland Center Drive). The applicant did not oppose this recommendation at the September 17, 1991 Planning commission meeting, MAYOR AND COMMON comrCI:L OPTI:ONS 1. The Mayor and Common Council may adopt the Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 based on the findings in the resolution and adopt the Negative Declaration and approve Parcel Map No. 14067 (with Conditions) and Conditional Use permit No. 91-07 (with conditions) and deny the request for sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption. 2. The Mayor and Common Council may adopt the Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 based on the findings in the resolution and/or adopt the Negative Declaration and approve Parcel Map No. 14067 (with Conditions) and deny Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07. . . o o General Plan Amendment No. 90-09, Parcel Map No. 14067 and conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 october 21, 1991 paqe 3 3. The Mayor and Common Council may continue General Plan Amendment No. 90-09, Parcel Map No. 14067 and Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 and direct staff to address alternative land use desiqnations or other modifications to the combined projects. 4. The Mayor and Common Council may deny General Plan Amendment No. 90-09, Parcel Map No. 14067 and Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07. RBCOIlMENDATI:ONS Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt the resolution, copy attached, which adopts the Negative Declaration and approve General Plan ~endment No. 90-09 as presented: and, 2. Adopt the Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 14067 and Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07, approve Parcel Map No. 14067 (with Conditions), approve Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 (with Conditions) and deny the request for the sale of wine and beer for off-site consumption. Prepared by: Deborah Woldruff, Associate Planner and Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner for Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director Planning And Building Services Department Attachment 1: Memorandum to the Planning Commission Attachment A: Planning Commission Staff Report for GPA 90-09 September 17, 1991 Attachment 2: Planning Commission Staff Report for Parcel Map No. 14067 and CUP 91-07 September 17, 1991 Attachment 3: Resolution Attachment A: Locaton Map Attachment B: Legal Description CITY OF SAN BERN"'INO - REQUEST Fa) COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJBCT General Plan Amendment No. 90-09, Parcel Map No. 14067 and Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 Mayor and Common council Meeting of October 21, 1991 DOUBS'.f General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 90-09 is a request to change the land use designation from IL, Industrial Light to CG-1, Commercial General on nine contiguous parcels comprising approximately 2.8 acres. This request is being processed concurrently with Parcel Map No. 14067 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 91-07 (as referenced). CUP 91-07 is a development proposal to construct a 24-hour self-service gas station/mini-market with the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption, a 5 bay car wash and a 12,800 square foot lease building for auto related uses. The parcel map is to consolidate the nine, substandard parcels into one. The site is located at the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "I" street. (See Attachment 1, the Planning Commission Staff Report for GPA 90-09, Attachment A , Exhibit C - refer to last map for location. ) The Planning commission Staff Reports for GPA 90-09 and CUP 91-07 (inclUdes Parcel Map 14067) are included as Attachments 1 and 2, respectively. BACKGROUND Prior to adoption of the General Plan, the amendment site was bisected by two zone districts (M-1, Light Manufacturing and C-M, Commercial Manufacturing). Upon adoption of the General Plan, the site was designated IL, Industrial Light. The commercial service uses proposed in CUP 91-07 are not permitted in the IL designation. As such, the applicant submitted It request for a general plan amendment to change the land use designation to CG-1 to be processed concurrently. It should be noted that if GPA 90-09 is denied, the conditional use permit must also be denied. ENVIROHMENTAL At different meetings, the Environmental Review Committee reviewed the initial studies for GPA 90-09 and CUP 91-07 (with Parcel Map CITY OF SAN BCRNARDINO - IVOMORANDUM To Planning Commission From Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director of Planning and Building Services September 17, 1991 _.Jbject General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 (Revised) Date Approved Item No. 3 Date OWNERS Claud Merrihew and Rick Fritts 8000 Auto Plaza Drive Riverside, CA 92504 APPLrCANT Nick Tavaglione construction 3545 Central Avenue, suite 200 Riverside, CA 92506 BACKGROUND General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 90-09 was continued from the Planning Commission meeting held on October 9, 1990 in error to November 6, 1990, Election Day. To correct this error, the item was placed on the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting held on October 16, 1990 and continued to the correct date of November 7, 1990. At the Planning commission meeting of November 7, 1990, the item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 11, 1990 and also to the meeting of January 22, 1991. The applicant then requested that GPA 90-09 l::Ie continued until the related development application, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 91-07, was processed to the Planning commission level. Both items are on the planning commission Agenda for september 17, 1991. rt should l::Ie noted that while GPA 90-09 was scheduled for and continued from several Planning commission meetings, the case has never l::Ieen presented to the Planning Commission. . .... ~ ".- - ..... ~ . '--. ~ " nr"~. o o Planning commission Meeting September 17, 1991 GPA NO. 90-09 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Since the staff report for this case was prepared (October 9, 1990)~ conditions in the project area have changed. As a result, staff has reevaluated the case and revised the staff report to recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 based on the findings in the staff report dated September 17, 1991. Respectfully, laX E~. ~ Di~ctor Planning And Building Services (JeW-A~t W~ :utlf- ~~borah Woldruff Associate Planner Attachment: Staff Report to Planning Commission (September 17, 1991) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 9-17-91 WARD 3 r /'""'.. r rAPPLICANT: Nick Tavaglione Constructl' W GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 3545 C~ntral Ave.6 #200 Rivers~de, CA 925 6 tn NO. 90-09 C REVISED OWNER: Claud Merrihew & Riik Frit 0 3545 Central Ave., 200 Riverside, CA 92506 \. '" F'"". r t) To change the land use designation from IL, Industrial W Light to CG-1, Commercial General on nine contiguous :) 0 parcels comprising 2.077 acres. This project is located W at the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and"I" a: Street. - C W a: C I....J '" r EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION Subject Vacant IL Industrial Light North Residential, Commercial, IL Industrial Light Industrial & Vacant Land South Commercial CG-l&RM Commerci~l Gene~al & Resident~al Med~urn East 1-215 & Commercial CCS&CR-1 central.clt~ SQuth & Commerc~a eg~onal Nest Residential, Commercial RS Residential Suburban GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC }CI:YES ( FLOOD HAZARD 0 YES 0 ZONE A Ie SEWERS: ~YES ) HAZARD ZONE: o NO \. ZONE: }Ct NO 0 ZONE B o NO o YES ..... JCC YES ( HIGH FIRE DYES AIRPORT NOISE! [ REDEVELOPMENT ) HAZARD ZONE: >>2 NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA: JCC NO \. o NO - - r ..I o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIACANT Z J<<XIX APPROVAL j! APPLICABLE EFFECTS WITH 0 MmGATlNG MEASURES - Ztn NO HR. !C 0 CONDITIONS WCJ 1I.C1 ::IZ o EXEMPT o HR. REQUIRED BUT NO II.Z 0 DENIAL Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CW OCl WITH MITIGATING t)::1 a:~ MEASURES ~ 0 CONTINUANCE TO -II. > n NO SIGNIFICANT o SlGNIACANT EFFECTS Z fd W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. - MINUTES ) a: ,...'-./ --- ..,j ClT'f' (II ... ........, --- pLAN-1m PAGE' OF 1 (.-10) . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 90-09 revised OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 9-17-91 2 ...... r- lU!lOUEST AND LOCATl:ON The applicant requests to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan to change the desiqnation from IL, Industrial Light to CG-1, commercial General for a site located at the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "I" street. Exhibit C of the Initial study shows the proposed amendment site. AREA CBARACTERl:STl:CS The amendment site is undeveloped and contains of land comprising approximately 2.077 gross acres. level and roughly rectanqular in shape. The parcels immediately north of the amendment site are vacant and designated IL. The IL land use desiqnation extends north for several blocks. North and beyond the vacant parcels are two single-family residences fronting on "I" Street and a restaurant and a moving and storage operation fronting on Jefferson street. East of the site is 1-215 with the Central City South area and the Inland Center Mall located beyond. The site is bounded by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company right-of-way and Inland Center Drive on the south. South of Inland Center Drive are commercial uses in an area designated CG-1, Commercial General and RM, Residential Medium. West of the site and across "I" Street is an area designated RS, Residential Suburban. That area is developed with single-family residences and a vacant plant nursery. Northwest of the site is Urbita Elementary School in an area designated PF, Public Facility. (See Exhibits Band C of the Initial study) nine parcels of The property is BACKGROUND Prior to adoption of the General Plan, the amendment site was bisected by two zone districts. That portion of the site immediately adjacent to the Southern Pacific Transportation company right-of-way was zoned M-l, Light Manufacturing. The remainder of the site was zoned C-M, Commercial Manufacturing. Upon adoption of the General Plan, the land use designation was changed to IL, Industrial Light. .... ...,j ~~~= PLAN-UI pN:]E 1 OF 1 14-101 . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 90-09 revised OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 9-17-91 3 ,.. ""I MUHICIPAL CODB Not applicable. CALIFORNIA BNVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOAl STATUS The qeneral plan amendment is subject to CEQA. The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application on Auqust 9, 1990 and determined that the proposed amendment would not have an adverse impact on the environment and a Neqative Declaration was recommended. The public review period for the Initial study and the proposed Neqative Declaration beqan on Auqust 16, 1990 and ended on September 5, 1990. While conditions in the area have chanqed since September 1990, the potential environmental impacts related to the amendment have not chanqed substantially. As such, the proposed Neqative Declaration is still valid and adequately addresses concerns. COMMENTS RECEIVED No comments were received. ANALYSIS BXISTING ~ USB DBSIGNATION The IL, Industrial Liqht land use desiqnation permits low intensity industrial uses and a small percentaqe of supportinq service uses. All uses permitted in the IL are characterized by the location of their predominant activities in enclosed buildinqs. The purpose of the IL desiqnation is to meet the City's objective as follows: "Retain, enhance, and intensify existinq and provide for the new development of liqht industrial uses alonq major vehicular, rail, and air transportation routes servinq the city. .." (General Plan Objective 1.32) The amendment site is located in proximity to 1-215 which qualifies as a major vehicular transportation route. .. =:.:..:::.r..9l j PLAN-UI PMIE' OF 1 t..eDl . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 90-09 revised OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE .j 9-17-91 4 ,. PROPOSBD LAHD USB DBSIG~TION The CG-1, commercial General land use desiqnation permits a diversity of community-servinq retail and service uses, entertainment uses, and professional and financial offices. The purpose of the CG-1 desiqnation is to meet the city's objective, as follows: "Provide for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, entertainment, office and related commercial uses alonq major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of the residents: reinforcinq existinq commercial corridors and centers and establishinq new locations as new residential qrowth occurs." (General Plan Objective 1.19) As a result of this objective, larqe areas east of I-215 and some areas south of the site were desiqnated as commercial districts. The "E" street corridor, located east of the site is desiqnated CG-1. Part of this district fronts on Inland Center Drive east of Inland Center Mall and another small CG-1 district occurs just south of the site on Inland Center Drive. "E" street and Inland Center Drive both are classified as major arterials on the Circulation Plan map and can be considered major transportation corridors. LAHD USB COMPATIBILITY AND GBNERAL PUN CONSISTENCY If the site were developed for commercial uses, impacts on surroundinq land uses would be minimal and not much more intense than impacts related to industrial development. The movinq and storage operation located on the northeast corner of the block is permitted in the IL desiqnation and would not be adversely affected by a commercial development nearby. The facility and its yard are oriented toward the north and access is provided off of Jefferson street. The restaurant located north of the site also has access off of Jefferson street and would not be adversely affected by a commercial development. The two single-family residences, located north of the site and fronting on I" street, and the restaurant are nonconforming uses in the IL designation. Any development on the site would need to buffer the residential uses with a wall and adequate landscaping. .... .. Pl,AN-1JII PM'JE 1 OF 1 (4.gQ) ~~u~ - . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 90-09 revised j 9-17-91 5 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ~ A number of single-family residences, located west of the site and across "I" street, face east and view the site. other than viewshed considerations, these residential uses are buffered from either industrial or commercial development on the site by "I" street, a four lane, secondary arterial. The land south/southwest of Inland Center Drive is designated CG-1, Commercial General and RM, Residential Medium. The RM contains several nonconforming commercial service uses. Similar to "I" street, Inland Center Drive provides a buffer area for any future multi-family uses south of the site. While the area appears to have sufficient commercial land available for development, it should be noted that the two, large commercial districts nearest to the site, the Central City South Plan Area and the Inland Center Mall, differ somewhat from typical commercial districts. The Central City South Plan, adopted on April 15, 1991, establishes three types of land use designations. The commercial land use designation, CCS-1, limits the commercial uses permitted as compared to those uses permitted in the CG-1 designation. Similarly, the Inland Center Mall is designated CR-1, Commercial Regional which permits region-serving commercial uses such as department stores and major retail outlets. The CG-1 districts located east of I-215 and south of the site are too far away to provide convenient commercial services to this wests ide neighborhood. The CG-1 district located south and across Inland Center Drive is too small to provide the neighborhood with adequate commercial services. Adding the acreage of the amendment site to this CG-1 district would provide the neighborhood with more land for the development of conveniently located commercial services. Redesignating the site CG-1 would have little effect on the adjacent IL district due to the relatively small size of the site and its location at the southern tip of the district. The amendment site is in proximity to I-215, a major transportation route and located on Inland Center Drive, a major transportation corridor. As such, the site could be designated as either IL or CG-1 and be consistent with the policies in the General Plan. TRAFFIC AND CIRCOLATION According to the City's Traffic Division, the impacts relating to traffic generated by either commercial or industrial development on site would have no measurable effect on the circulation in the area as far as the total number of trips generated vs. the capacity of "I" Street or Inland Center Drive. ...j .. PLAN-UI PAGE t OF 1 14<<)) ~"=I~-;;; ~~ . ' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 90-09 revised OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 9-17-91 6 ~ """Ill A significant number of vehicles travel on Inland Center Drive, turn north onto "I" street and then, west onto Grant street at Urbita Elementary School. This appears to be a well established traffic pattern in the area. Vehicles slowing or stopping to enter or exit this site could cause interruptions to existing circulation which, in turn, could create safety hazards to vehicles and pedestrians. It should be noted that pedestrian traffic in the area includes school age children traveling to and from Urbita Elementary School. The Inland Center Drive side of the site is bounded by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company right-of-way. As such, access may be limited to "I" street, a secondary arterial, if the railroad doe,s not grant the property owner easements. However, proj ect specific impacts relating to circulation and access are addressed at the development proposal stage for either commercial or industrial development on the site. The developer will be required to submit a traffic study and to provide any traffic control devices deemed necessary by the City's Traffic Engineer. CONCLUSIONS The proposed General Plan Amendment is in conformance with the goals, objectives and policies in the General Plan. The proposed amendment will increase the existing CG-l, commercial General district located south of the amendment site. The result is that the neighborhood will have more land available for the development of commercial services. The effect of the amendment on the adjacent IL district will be minimal due the small size of the site and its location at the southern end of the district. PINDINGS The proposed CG-l, Commercial General land use designation will change the General Plan Land Use Plan and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. The proposed amendment is not detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the city as addressed in this report. ... CITl' 01' ... ......." CItmW.~ u.n_. Pl.AN4.D8 PAGE 1 Of 1 (4-10) _1i2>...' ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE r.PII tlO-Otl r,m; "",n OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 9-17-91 7 ~ .... Designating the site as CG-1, commercial General will increase the commercial by 2.077 acres in an neighborhood lacking in convenient commercial services. The deletion of this acreage from the IL, Industrial Light designation will have a minimal effect on the balance of land uses within the city. The amendment site is physically suitable for the CG-1, Commercial General land use designation. All public services are available to the proposed amendment site. Any future development permissible under the proposed designation would not impact on such services. RECOMMENDATION Staff reco~ends that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council that: 1. A Negative Declaration be adopted in accordance with Section 21080.1 of CEQA. 2. The General Plan Land Use Plan be changed from IL, Industrial Light to CG-1, commercial General for the site shown on Exhibit A of the Initial Study. Respectfully submitted, ~t=:; ~'-- '-'l~ La . Reed, Ass ant Director Planning and Building Services ~/.~~~ W~:LJ..k.L l~orah Woldruff (!' ,.... Associate Planner /dw Attachment: A - Initial Study Exhibit A Proposed Amendment and Land Use Designations Exhibit B Existing Land Use Exhibit C Location and Land Use Designations ... ...,j ~.c..:r :~~ Pl.AN-1.OI PAGE 1 OF 1 C~ -- - - , ATTACHMENT "A" o 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PlANNING DEPARTMENT . . INITIAL STUDY General Plan Aaendment .0. 90-9 Proiect DescriDtion: To chanoe the land use desionation from IL. Industrial Lioht to CG-l. Commercial General on nine contiouous parcels comprisino 2.077 oross acres. Proiect Location: This project is located at the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "I" Street. Date. July 30. 1990 ADDlicantls) .... and Address. Nick Tavaolione Construction 3545 Central Avenue. Suite 200 Riverside. CA 92506 Prooertv OWnerls) Rame and Address. Claud Merrihew ~d Rick Fritts 3545 Central Avenue. Suite 200 Riverside. CA 92506 Initial Study PreDared bv. Deborah Woldruff Associate Planner City of San BernarcUno Depar~nt of Plannino and BuilcUno Services 300 Korth -D- Street San Bernardino. CA 92418 ..L _ o 0 INITIAL STUDY FOR GPA 90-9 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report is provided by the City of San Bernardino as an Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 90-9 which proposes to chanqe the land use designation from IL, Industrial Liqht to CG-1. Commercial General on nine contiquous parcels comprising approximately 2.077 acres. located at the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "I" Street. As stated in Section Environmental Quality Act Initial Study are to. 15063 of the California guidelines, the purposes of an 1. Provide the Lead Agency with information to use as .the basis for decidinq whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or a Negative Declaration: 2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a project., mi tiqatinq adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared, thereby enablinq the project to qualify for Negative Declaration: 3. Assist the preparation of an EIR. if one is required, by: {Al Focusinq the EIR on the effects determined to be siqnificant. (B) Identify the effects determined not to be siqnificant. and (e) Explaining the reasons for determininq that potentially significant effects would not be significant. 4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the desiqn of a project: 5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the findinq in a Neqative Declaration that a project will not have a significant effect on the environment: t. - - . . . ' o o INITIAL STUDY FOR GPA 90-6 6. Eliminate unnecessary EIRs: 7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the proiect. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant's request is to amend the City's General Plan Land Use Plan to change the land use desianation from IL. Industrial Light to CG-1. Commercial General for a site located at the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "I" Street. (See Exhibit A) The site is comprised of nine parcels of land. roughly pie shaped. consistino of approximate 1 y 2.077 acres combined (Assessor Parcel Nos. 141-192-12 through 20). (See Exhibi t C) The IL designation permits low intensity industrial and manufacturing uses and a small percentaae of service related uses. The CG-1 designation permits a diversity of community-serving retail and service uses. entertainment uses, and professional and financial offices. (See Exhibit B for Existing Land Uses) 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.1 Environmental Setting The site is roughly triangular in shape with the point oriented to the south. The property is level and. although it has been rough graded within the last year, some vegetation exists on the northern hal f. The vegetation primarilY consists of unidentified weeds and scrubbrush. The site is located in an area having high liquefaction susceptibility and potential ground subsidence. A high pressure. six inch pipeline carrying JP4 jet fuel to Norton Air Force Base runs along the southeast boundary of the site. - - . " () o INITIAL STUDY FOR GPA 90-9 North of the site is designated IL. Industrial Light with single family residences fronting on "I" Street and a restaurant and a storage facility adiacent to the offramp. East of the site is I-21S with Central City South area and the Inland Center Mallon the other side. The site is bounded by Inland Center Drive on the south with commercial serving uses to the south of it in an area designated CG-l, Commercial General and RH. Residential Medium. West of the site is designated RS. Residential Suburban and is developed with single family residences and a vacant plant nursery. Northwest of the site is Urbita Elementary School in an area designated PF, Public Facility. - . . . . cOt OF SAN BERNACDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACRGROYlID Application Number: G...J\(Ilra..l..f.( /'l" O-m."...d m to 1\ t..9 0 - q ~ f11W\t~~.~.ac.cs.. Location: ~~ flLrrll\H nf..Xa14ad ~~.,.jv.. I'.twl "X" ~~ 'I//-/9-"-/:l.-I1A.rlJ ).0) Environmental Constraints Areas: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: ~ B. ~~BQ6B~~~PACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. ~I.th Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? )( b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15' natural grade? c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x -L L REVISED 12/87 PAGE 1 OF 8 . . . . Maybe e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? h. Other? 2.- 6lB_~QY~: Will the proposal result in: a. air upon emissions or ambient air Substantial an effect quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Development within a high wind hazard area? 3. Will the ~~E___RESOURCES: proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? ()Lea ~ No x 'i . x x x x " 'i. x: x )(. )( REVISED 12/87 PAGE 2 OF 8 , . o 4. BIOLOGIC6Uj:~~i: propo..l result in: Could the a. Change unique, species habitat trees? b. Change unique, species habitat? c. Other? in the number of any rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: o-s a. Increases in existing noise X levels? - Exposure of people to noise levels over 65 interior noise levels dB? exterior dB or over 45 b. c. Other? 6. ~_...Yn: result in: Will the proposal a. A change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? b. Development within an Airport District? c. Development within "Greenbelt" Zone A,B, or C? d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? e. Other? 't.. x . No y. )( 'I. x x X X )( Maybe REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8 . . o 7. Will the MAN-MADE HAjh~$: project: a. Ose, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b. Involve the release hazardous substances? c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? d. Other? B. HQY~: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? b. Other? 9. rMl:!~fQRTA'1'IOrug~A'1'ION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? c. Impact upon existing public, transpolt~tion systems? d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? REVISED 10/87 of cJes x y.. )( )( No x x X ~ "-" Maybe '" x . x . )( )( PAGE ~ OF 8 ~ Maybe . . o g. A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? Other? of h. 10. fYBL1~ SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? Police protection? Schools (Le. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? b. c. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? g. Other? 11. QIlLITIES: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? b. disjointed utility aes No x )( )( X X. -L )( -L 'X x X -4- X X J( -L """'\ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 5 OF 8 Result in a pattern of extensions? c. Require the construction of new facilities? . ' . . o o Yes Maybe 12. AES'1'HE'1'I~: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. CP~1~~~~PURCES: proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Could the b. c. Adverse impacts historic object? Other? physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate No x )( x )( )( x REVISED 10/87 PAGE 6 OF 8 '" r o Os """'Ill No Maybe b. important example. of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant ;) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? )( . ... }{. c. x d. x c. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) ~t8,. a~ \... ~ REVISEO 10/87 PAGE 7 OF 8 #{~'7'-"-^ . . o o INITIAL STUDY FOR GPA 90-9 3.2 Environmental Impacts 3.2.1 Earth Resources 1. g. The amendment site is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies zone but is located in an area susceptible to hiqh liquefaction and potential ground subsidence. A report addressing the liquefaction and subsidence issues will be required at the time of development. 3.2.2 Air Resources 2.a. The site is not developed and has no substantial impact on the air quality in the area. However. intensive commercial or industrial development could affect air quality as a.result of increased air emissions in an area already impacted by automobile traffic on 1-215. 3.2.2 Water Resources 3.a. Commercial or industrial development on the site will require the construction of impermeable surfaces to facilitate the land use and on-site circulation and parkinq. As a result. absorption rates would be decreased thereby increasinq surface runoff. 3.d. As discussed in 3.a.. either industrial or commerci.al development would involve the construction of impermeable surfaces such as asphalt or concrete. Enqine fluids. residue from automobile tires. solid exhaust particulates and other air emissions as well as chemical pollutants indigenous to industrial or commercial land uses tend to collect on impermeable surfaces to be washed into the qroundwater as runoff. If required. mitigation will be determined at the project specific staqe. - ~".~ - .' 0 o INITIAL STUDY FOR GPA 90-9 3.2.4. Noise 5.a. ,b. Because of proximity to I-215. existing noise levels at the site are at 70 dBa. For industrial or commercial land uses. such noise levels are conditionally acceptable provided that a detailed analysis of noise reduction requirements is made pr ior to construction. In addition. Standard Requirements and Conditions of Approval imposed upon site specific development permits will reduce the potential impacts from noise resul ting from construction. Industrial or commercial development proposals for the site should be carefully evaluated to ensure that th~ specific project does not create nc-ise levels that exceed 65 dBa. In addition, new development should not significantly add tc- already existing noise levels. 3.2.5 Land Use 6.a. The proposed amendment will change the General Plan land use designtion. 3.2.6 Man-made Hazards 7.a. Commercial or industrial uses on the site could result in the storage. sale and use of toxic materials on the site. Toxic materials could include a diversity of products such as paints. dry cleaning solvents, detergents. engine fluids, fertilizers and pesticides not normally found in quantity in less intensive land use categories. 7.d. A high pressure, six inch pipeline carrying JP4 jet fuel to Norton Air Force Base runs along the east-southeast boundary of the site. Any development plans for the site will need to include the location of the pipeline on the site plan. Related safety issues will need to be addressed at the project specific stage. J . . !!IL J1 o o INITIAL STUDY FOR GPA 90-9 3.2.7 3.2.8 Transportation/Circulation 9.a. The project site is located on Inland Center Drive at the northwest corner of "I" Street. The Circulation Element in the General Plan classifies Inland Center Drive as a four lane major arterial and "I" Street as a four lane secondary arterial. The City's Traffic Engineer calculates that approximatelY 800 Average Daily Trips (ADT) would result from a commercial development on the site. Because the existing ADT for Inland Center Drive is 13.200 and 5.000 for "I" Street. the addition Df 800 ADTs would not significantly increase traffic in the area. 9. d. . f. A significant number of the vehicles travel on Inland Center Drive. turn north onto "I" Street and then. west onto Grant Street at Urbita Elementary School. Upon close observation. this appears to be a well established traffic pattern in the area. Access to the pro~ect site probably will be limited to "I" Street since access off of Inland Center Drive is blocked by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company right-of-way. The addition of vehicles in the area traveling to and from the project site could cause interuptions to the existing circulation and perhaps. create safety hazards to vehicles and pedestrians. It should be noted that the area's pedestrian traffic includes many school age children from Urbita Elementary School. Aesthetics 12.b. Development plans will be reviewed for site and building. landscaping and irrigation at the project specific stage to ensure compatibility and quality design. .L - 1:3 1.. "" "~ D. DE'1'ERMI~l. 0 0 On the ba.i. of this initial .tudy, r7I' The propo.ed project COULD NO'1' have a siqnif1cant effect on tb L:J environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a siqnificant effect on th O environment, althouqh there will not be a significant effect i this case because the mitiqation measure. de.cribed above hay been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will b, prepared. The proposed project MAY have a siqnificant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENrAL IMPACT REPORT is required. o ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY or SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ':;;PAJ tf,u7',"'~~r. /i:/UCII'Al ti-~ Name and Title I ~ur~ Date: r - ~ -'To REVISED 12117 PAGE 8 OF 8 - ~'""" .' CITYCDF SAN BER~RDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. (GPA) 90-9 TITLE Proposed Amendment and Larxi Use Designations N.W.Cor. l..ot.:o& , ee.,tra Ci~: , ""+h r" U:. J ~; I XL . i lol~ I..~ ~ I.. 1 M t-9AgELL ~I p:.:~'" ~::-. ~ . "' :. ~::" , .,.. , It' IZ JI..: IA ::;) : I-lIS .\ EXHIBIT A .' CITYQ)F SAN BER~RDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. (GPA) 90-9 TITLE EKistinq Land Use r....2.C~---. .. ......~.... ...... ..... .....:.:.:.:.:.:. ................. :.:.:............ ................ ................ :.:..:.:.:.:.:.: .............. I -"-__Il.~ .. :: " 1% 11&, '" I ':J I-2IS .' .... :::::: ........ .......... ............ .:::::::::::::: ................ ................ ................:.:. .................. ..:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:::: 0.:::::::::::::::::::::: .:::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::... S F Res VA Coo.nt Corrmercial , ,:. It ......,."" , ., ~ . ' . ' '. , .' ...' ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..... ......................... ..::~~~~~~;~~~m~~m~ ...........:.... :::::::::::::: ........... ::::::::::: ::::::::::: .::::::::::: .:::::::::::: .............. .:::~:~:~:~:~:~:~ .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .................... ...................... ..:::::::::::::::::::::: .::::::::::::::::::::::::: \ ~~;~i~.i: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ............. .......................... ......................... .::::::::::::::::::::::: .::::::::::::::::::::: .................... .................... ................... .::::::::::::::::: ............... .~.::::::::::::: ...... .::~~\\\\\ , , , , , , . . . . \ ) EXHIBIT B - - !lItl Ii ..." CITY d)F SAN BER~RDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. (GPA) 90-9 TITLE IQcAtion and Land Use Designation i l" IT COUf.r 'pf ....: ..~~ "' .... .. ," ..:....:.... ,. .... . ." ..' ~ ......... :. . .. . .. .. . .~:)V.:.~~~. ~ ) .\: ; ,. . ; ': c.tHTU j ::' :" .. , . . . ~ l& DII. .. -\ EXHIBIT C , . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT w rn c o ~ ffi ::) o w a: - c w a: c SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD 4 9-17-91 3 PARCEL MAP NO. 14067 and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-07 APPUCANT.Nick Tavaglione Constructi ~545 Central, SU1te 200 Riverside, CA 92506 OWNER: R.E. Fritts and C. Merrihe 8000 Auto Drive Riverside, CA 92504 A Conditional Use Permit to construct a 24-hour self-serve gas station/mini-market with the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption, a 24-hour 5 bay car wash and a 12,800 square foot lease building for auto related uses and a parcel map to combine the 8 parcels comprising the 2.0+ acre site. Located on the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "J" Street. EXISTING LAND lJSE PROPERTV Subject North South East 'lest ..I :! zrn we ~z z- OC a:i: -II. > Z W ~~~~ ZONING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Industrial Light Industrial Light Commercial General Industrial Light n ( SEWERS: DYES ) jQcNO REDEVELOPMENT DYES PROJECT AREA: ~NO Vacant IL Single-Family Residential IL and ~roving Company Convenience Store, Air Conditioning Sales & CG-l Vacant Warefiouse Vacant IL HIGH FIRE 0 YES HAZARD ZONE: XX NO o NOT APPLICABLE o EXEMPT JlO{NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ) FLOOD HAZARD 0 YES 0 ZONE A ZONE: jgrNO 0 ZONE B (GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC 0 YES _ HAZARD ZONE: Xk NO ( ) AIRPORT NOISE! 0 YES CRASH ZONE: ~NO o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z XX APPROVAL EFFECTS WITH 0 MmGATING MEASURES ~ U NOE.I.R. CONDITIONS II.C o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO II.Z 0 DENIAL SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CW WITH MITIGATING ~~ MEASURES ~ 0 CONTINUANCE TO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS fd SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. MINUTES a: PLAN-I.D2 PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-110) Ilop....II.,............... ~ - . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 140E;7/CTTP q 1 -07 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 2 r' ..., Rlr.nUJr.RT The applicant requests the approval of a Conditional Use Permit under the authority of Municipal Code Sections 19.83.300 and 19.83.500, to construct a 24-hour self-service gasoline station/ mini-market, with the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption, a 24-hour self-service 5-bay car wash and a 12,800 square foot lease building for automotive related services. The request includes a parcel map to combine the 8 parcels comprising the 2.08 acre site into a single parcel. SITE LOCATION The site is located at the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "I" Street in the IL, Industrial Light land use designation. MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Conditional Use Permit The Conditional Use Permit proposal is not consistent with the General Plan. General Plan Policies 1.32.10 and 1.32.11 enumerate the general categories of uses permitted in the Industrial Light General Plan land use designation. Pursuant to Policy 1.32.11, supporting retail and personal service commercial uses (restaurants, newsstands, florists, tobacco shops, etc.) are permitted provided that they constitute no more than 15 percent of the total building square footage. The proposal is retail in nature and exceeds the 15 percent total. Hence the inconsistency of the proposal with the General Plan. The applicant has filed a General Plan Amendment Application (General Plan Amendment No. 90-09) to change the land use designation to CG-l, Commercial General. The CG-1 land use designation permits the uses included in the proposal. Assuming that General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 is approved and the site is redesignated as CG-1, the proposal would be consistent with the General Plan and in Conformance with the Municipal Code as shown in Attachment "A". Parcel Hap The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan and is in conformance with the Municipal Code as shown in Attachment "An. .. Clr"af....~ ClEfdM,.Moor II .GU PLAN-IJI8 PAGE' OF 1 I....,) - - J - 1. . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/C'lTP Ql-07 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 3 , ..... ~Ar,IFORNT A ENVTRONHF.NTAr. OUALITY ACT STATUS Staff prepared an Initial study for the proposal and presented it to the Environmental Review Committee on June 20, 1991. The Committee recommended a Negative Declaration. The project was made available for public review and comment from June 27, 1991 to July 17, 1991. No comments were received. BACKGROUND As noted, the site is presently designated IL, which does not permit the proposed facility. The applicant has filed General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 to amend the General Plan land use designation to CG-l which would permit the proposed facility, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Should General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 be denied, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 must also be denied since it would then be inconsistent with the General Plan. The actions available to the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 are therefore somewhat different from those available on other Conditional Use Permit applications. The Planning Commission may after reviewing staff's analysis of the proposal and hearing public input, either deny the application, or recommend approval of the application to the Mayor and Common Council. Since the Mayor and Council will take final action on General Plan Amendment No. 90-09, they will also implicitly take action on Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 since its General Plan Consistency will hinge on the final approval of the General Plan Amendment. ANALYSIS Assumpt10ns The analysis section of this staff report is written with the underlying assumption that the General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 will be approved and that the land use desiqnation of the project site is CG-l, Commercial General. The sole purpose of this assumption is to enable the analysis of the proposed facility under the CG-1 land use standards. Nothinq else is implied by the assumption. Site and Area Character1st1cs The irregularly shaped site is relatively flat with little or no vegetation, showing signs of having been disced for weed ... ...01 ClfYCI"'~ ..............- m. I.' PLAN-UB PME 1 OF 1 (4-80) . . o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/ CUP 91-07 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 4 ,. ..... abatement. The property is bordered on the west by "I" street, and on the south by Inland Center Drive and a rail spur, owned by Southern Pacific Transportation company. A buried 6-inch fuel pipeline parallels the rail spur, and carries JP-4 jet fuel to Norton Air Force Base. Interstate 215 is located just east of the site. surrounding land uses include Single-family homes across "I" Street on the west, single-family homes and a moving company to the north, vacant industrial designated land to the east, and mixed commercial and industrial land uses across Inland Center Drive to the south. Urbita Elementary School is located across "I" street, approximately 81 feet to the northwest. proposal The applicant proposes to construct station and mini-market with off-site 24-hour self-serve 5-bay car wash and building for auto related services. The proposal also includes a parcel map to combine the 8 parcels comprising the site into a single 2.077 acre parcel. No minimum lot size is specified by the Code for either the CG-1 or IL General Plan land use designations. a 24-hour self serve gas sale of beer and wine, a a 12,800 square foot lease Permitted Use Pursuant to Code Section 19.83.300, the self-serve gasoline station/ mini-market and 5-bay self serve car was are permitted uses in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Pursuant to Code Section 19.83.500, the off-site sale of beer and wine is also a permitted use in the CG-1 land use district subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Applicability of Ordinance HC-770 The Convenience Store Regulation, HC-770 became effective on April 10, 1991 (Attachment "G"l. The ordinance applies to any convenience store applications deemed complete between April 10, 1991 and the effective date of the Development Code on June 3, 1991. Since the Conditional Use Permit application was deemed complete on Hay 22, 1991, HC-770 applies. Hc-770 defines a convenience store as any establishment providing for the retail sale of groceries, staples, sundry items and/or alcoholic beverages within structures of less than 5,000 square ... on 0' IIiJIIII .....-.0 ...-........1!IWlClU ~ PA6EtOF1 C4-ClO1 - ~ - ..L .b. - . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 5 .... feet of gross floor area. The ordinance also restricts convenience stores from being located less than 1,000 feet from an existing or previously approved convenience store, or an existing elementary, junior high school, or high school as measured from the nearest distance from one property line to another. The proposal does not technically meet the definition of a convenience store under HC-770. The mini-market has approximately 3,100 square feet of retail area and is located within a 5,100 square foot structure. The size constraint was placed in the definition to differentiate larger grocery markets from convenience stores. It was intended that the definition of convenience stores include those stores with a gross floor area of 5,000 square feet or less, not stores contained in buildings of 5,000 square feet or less. The Development Code implemented June 3, 1991, clearly reflects this intent. The Development Code defines a convenience store as the retail sales of groceries, staples, sundry items and/or alcoholic beverages where the gross floor area is less than 5,000 square feet. Were the application subject to the Development Code, the proposed use would be classified as a convenience store and would be restricted from locating within 1,000 feet of any school or another convenience store. The proposed mini-market is located 81 feet from Urbita Elementary School, across "I" street, and 119 feet from another convenience store, across Inland Center Drive. Police Investigation The proposal is located within reporting district SC317 which has crime statistics 19 percent above the average for reporting districts in San Bernardino. Of the Part II arrests for this district during the past 90 days, 33 percent were alcohol related. Part II arrests include all alcohol, narcotics and weapons infractions. The site is also located within Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) census tract SO. The tract has a population of 1,532 people. According to ABC records, there are two on-sale licensed premises with two allowed within this census tract, and five off-sale licensed premises with two allowed within this census tract. The nearest on-sale licensed location is The Skylark, located approximately 210 feet from the proposal. The nearest off-sale licensed location is the 81 Store, located 119 feet from the proposed mini-market. The nearest school is Urbita Elementary School located South "J" Street, approximately 81 feet to the northwest at 771 of the ClrTY (IF .. ......... --- PLM-8.08 PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-110) Q:ll ...... .. o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 4 9-17-91 6 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ..... proposal. The nearest church is st. prophez Elis Greek Orthodox Church at 1035 Inland Center Drive, approximately 1,056 feet from the proposed site. Based upon the proximity of School and the .1 store, the of Conditional Use Permit Attachment "F"l. the proposed mini-market to Urbita Police Department recommends denial No. 91-07 (See Police Report, Area ResIdents During their investigation, the Police Department attempted contact with 6 residents living in the immediate vicinity of the project, but were only able to contact 4. Of the 4 contacted, 2 were opposed to the proposal, and 2 had no opposition. The 2 residents opposed based their opposition on fears of increased vandalism, violence and graffiti the felt the use would bring to the area. TraffIc and CIrculatIon A traffic study of the proposed Shopping center J. F. Davidson Associates, Incorporated and was City Traffic Engineer. To reduce potential resulting from the proposal, the Engineering included several Standard Requirements concerning was prepared by reviewed by the traffic impacts Department has the following: 1. The improvement of Inland Center Drive to provide a westbound acceleration and deceleration lane from the easterly most boundary to "I" Street (subject to right-of- way availability adjacent to the Southern Pacific Rail Road (S.P.R.Rl tracks; 2. The restriping of Inland Center Drive between Scenic Drive and "I" Street to provide one lane each direction and a two- way turn lane; 3. The installation of "NO PARKING" signs on the north side of Inland Center Drive from "I" Street to the easterly project boundary; 4. The contribution of $20,000.00 toward the future signalization of the intersection of Inland Center Drive and "I" street; and, ... ~.=:.= ~- ...,j PLAN-I.D8 PAGE 1 Of: 1 (4-10) ]J- JIll . . o o ,... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 4 9-17-91 7 ... OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE r """'l payment of a traffic system fee in the approximate amount of $60,000 (exact amount to be determined by the city Traffic Engineer at time of application for building permit). Normal vehicular ingress/egress to the project site across the Southern Pacific Transportation Company rail spur from Inland Center drive may conflict with rail traffic using the spur. The project has been conditioned to obtain encroachment permits from the Southern Pacific Transportation company or show proof of any existing access easement(s), prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Access to the site across the rail spur will be subject to any requirements or conditions specified by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company in granting an encroachment permit or property easement. 5. Internal CIrculatIon The applicant proposes two sets of self-service gasoline pumps, eight islands total. Given the number of pumps proposed and the proposed configuration, large vehicles using the pumps could result in drive aisle blockage, hindering internal circulation. The western most set of pumps conflict with the two driveways at the western most corner of the site, along "I" Street, and with the three compact parking stalls located near the same area. To improve circulation, and reduce potential traffic and pedestrian hazards, the set of pumps nearest "I" Street should be deleted from the plan and remaining pump location and drive aisle design revised to comply with the minimum Code Development Standards. The applicant was informed of the potential circulation conflicts caused by the extra set of pumps at the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting of June 20, 1991. The applicant elected not to revise his plans to comply with staff's recommendation and requests instead that the Planning Commission to consider allowing him to retain the pump islands nearest "I" Street. All other drive aisles meet the minimum Municipal Code Standards of 24 feet for a two-way drive aisle. parkIng The 88 parking stall shown on the site plan meet the minimum Municipal Code requirement of 86 parking stalls for the project. However, only 30 percent of the total required parking may be compact (27 stalls). The applicant proposes 38 compact parking stalls. The project has therefore been conditioned to convert 11 of the proposed compact stalls into standard stalls and maintain a minimum of 59 standard size parking stalls at the site. ... PLAN-U8 pAGE 10F 1 (AOIO) ~~.~ ("'- r . . o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 ""I 4 9-17-91 8 t OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ..... .. Internal Landscaping and Planting The proposed internal planting and landscaping of the project exceeds the Municipal Code landscaping requirements of 5 percent. The project proposed landscape areas are equal to 9 percent of the total paved parking area. Liquefaction The site is located within an area identified as having high liquefaction potential. To reduce potential hazards, the Engineering Department has added Standard Requirements concerning compliance with the provisions of the city's liquefaction ordinance, MC-676. Ground Subsidence The project is located in an area subject to potential ground subsidence. According to the General Plan, potential subsidence within this area may be as great as 5 to 8 feet if groundwater is depleted from the Bunker Hill-San Timoteo Basin. Since 1972, the San Bernardino Municipal Water District has maintained groundwater levels from recharge to percolation basins which, in turn filters back into the alluvial groundwater deposits. Project Conditions of Approval requiring the above mentioned liquefaction report to also address ground subsidence, and incorporate any grading/ building requirements recommended by the report concerning subsidence into the grading/building plans have been included. Fuel Pipeline As noted previously, the site is bordered on the south by a 6- inch high pressure fuel pipeline which carries JP-4 jet fuel to Norton Air Force Base. A rupture of the jet fuel pipeline and any ensuing fire could result in the potential exposure of people to fire safety hazards. Since the pipeline parallels the Southern Pacific rail spur, the most likely cause of pipeline rupture would be a train derailment. The rail spur leads to the warehouse distribution facilities north of Inland Center Drive less than a one half mile to the east. Trains using the rail are therefore likely to be traveling at an extremely slow speed. The rail in the vicinity of the project is straight for several thousand feet both to the east and west. Derailment is therefore considered unlikely. The project has been conditioned to maintain a setback of 100 feet for all structures intended for occupancy to reduce potential fire hazards. .. ~Cw.o~= PLAN-I.DB PAGE' OF 1 C4olO) , . . o Q CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT OBSERVATIONS CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 """"'l 4 9-17-91 9 I AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ,.. """"'l Underground Gasoline storage Tanks All underground fuel storage tanks, fuel lines, and gasoline dispensers are required to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and County Environmental Health Services Regulations regarding air quality control, soil and ground water protection, and fire prevention. Water Qual! ty operation of the carwash could result in the release of toxins or other hazardous materials in the form of grease, oil, other insolubles/pollutants during vehicle washing into the sewer system, which could affect water quality. To preclude the release of any hazardous substances, on-site drains have been in=luded in the pro::lect design. The drains are des1gned to contain ~ny runoff created in the course of normal operation. The City Water Department has also included several Standard requirements concerning the handling of runoff contained by the dra1n system to preserve water qua11ty. COMMENTS RECEIVED Development Review Committee The proposal was reviewed at the Development Review Comm1ttee (DRC) meeting on June 20, 1991. The ORe cleared the s1te plans, floor plans and elevations for hearing by the Planning Comm1ssion. The Building and safety, Police, Fire, Public Works/Engineering, and Water Departments have provided Standard Requirements for the proposal (see Standard Requ1rements, Attachment "0"). Police Department The Police Department is opposed to the request for sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption at the facility. The reasons for their opposition are discussed above in the analysis section of th1s staff report and are contained in the Police Report (Attachment "F"). Councilman Ward 3 Former Councilman Flores The application was routed to the Council Office for review while Councilman Flores was still in office. The Councilman ob::lected to the pro::lect, noting that the property was designated IL, ... .. W"...&.=.I1"Mt:L. PLAN-I.08 PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-110) ,>>, . . o .Q. r- OBSERVATIONS CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE ~-.l/-~.l PAGE 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ~ Industrial Light under the General plan, and that the proposal was not allowable under that land use designation. He had concerns over the compatibility of the proposal with the residences located across "I" street and the proximity of the proposal to Urbita Elementary School. councilman Hernandez Councilman Hernandez did not forward any formal comments on the proposal. However, in discussions with staff he did indicated that he was not opposed to it. However, he did express some concern about the proposed sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption at the facility given the proximity to Urbita Elementary School and the convenience store located across Inland Center Drive. California Department of Transportation The California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), noted that the proposed project would affect the Interstate 215 ramp traffic and volumes along Inland Center Drive. They recommended that a traffic study be prepared to address traffic impacts with suggested mitigation. As noted elsewhere in this staff report, a traffic study was prepared and the mitigation measures suggested included as Engineering standard Requirements. San Bernardino Unified School District The School District requests that the buildings, site, accruements, present and future, not obstruct or impede conduct of stUdent/pedestrian or vehicular traffic to the local area schools. and all the safe and from CONCLUSION The site is presently designated IL, Industrial Light by the General Plan. General Plan policy 1.32.11 limits retail uses in the IL land use designation to supporting retail and personal service commercial uses (restaurants, newsstands, florists, tobacco shops, etc.) not to exceed more than 15 percent of the building square footage. Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 is retail in nature and exceeds the 15 percent total. As long as the underlying land use designation remains IL, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 will be inconsistent with the General Plan. .. c:nv ClI' ... .-..c> --- PLAN-1.D8 pAGE' OF , ~ , ' o o r CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 11 t. OBSERVATIONS ,.. The applicant has filed a General Plan Amendment (GPA 90-09) to change the land use designation of the site to CG-l, Commercial General, which would permit the uses proposed under Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07. Should the General Plan Amendment be denied, then Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 must also be denied since it 'would remain inconsistent with the General Plan. However, for the purposes of analysis of the proposal, it was assumed that the underlying land use designation of the site was changed to CG-l. Under the CG-l land use designation, the uses proposed by conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 are permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. circulation on the site is hindered by the set of pumps at the western end of 2the site, near "I" Street. The applicant would like the Planning Commission to consider allowing the western most set of pumps to remain, however, staff recommends their deletion to improve circulation and hence, reduce the potential hazards to traffic and pedestrians using the site. The 88 parking stalls shown on the site plan are adequate to serve the site, but the number of compact parking stalls shown on the site plan exceed the maximum permissible number of compact stall allowed by the Code by 11. A Condition of Approval has been added requiring the applicant to convert these 11 stalls to standard stalls. The proposal otherwise conforms to the development standards specified by the Municipal Code for the CG-l land use designation with respect to landscaping, setbacks, and lot coverage. All potential traffic and environmental hazards can be mitigated through the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements attached hereto. The Police Department is opposed to the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption at the facility and has recommended denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 for that reason. As evident from the Police Report, there is an overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licences in the ABC census tract; there are 5 existing off-sale establishments, whereas only 2 are allowed. Since the application was deemed complete on May 22, 1991, it is not subject to the Development Code. Under the Development Code, the mini-market with off-site sale of beer and wine would be considered a convenience store and would not be allowed because it is located within 1,000 feet of an elementary school and another convenience store; it is located 81 feet from Urbita Elementary School and 119 feet from 11 store, a convenience store located across Inland Center Drive. The application is subject to the Convenience Store Ordinance, HC-770, which was in effect at the time the applications were deemed complete. HC-770 also restricts convenience stores from locating within 1,000 feet of schools or other convenience stores. However, the application is "" """"Il ..., . PLAIH.III PAGE 1 OF , (4-10) ~.=.&~~c: o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 ""I 4 9-17-91 l;l OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ""I ~ in technical compliance with HC-770, because the proposal does not meet the definition contained in that ordinance for convenience stores; although the mini-market has approximately 3,100 square feet of proposed retail area, it is located within a structure larger than 5,000 square feet. The intent of the definition of convenience stores in HC-770 was to differentiate larger grocery market from convenience stores. The proposal, therefore, does not conform to the intent of HC-770. The request for off-site sale of alcohol in the mini-market should therefore be denied. Parcel Hap No. 14067 meets all standards of the Hunicipal Code and is consistent state Law and the General Plan, in that the resultant parcel will meet all applicable Hunicipal Code standards. No minimum lot size, width or depth is specified by the code. RECOMHENDATION staff recommends, contingent upon the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval for General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 be approval, that the Planning Commission: 1. Recommend the adoption the Negative Declaration to the Hayor and Council; and 2. Recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 and Parcel Hap No. 14067 to the Hayor and Council, with the deletion of the western most set of gasoline pumps to improve internal circulation, and the conversion of 11 compact parking stalls to standard parking stalls, and subject to the attached Finding of Fact (Attachment "B"), Conditions of Approval (Attachment "C"), and standard Requirements (Attachment "0"). 3. Denial of the request for off-site sales of alcohol at the proposed establishemt subject to the attached Findings of Fact for Alcoholic Beverage Sales (Attachment liB") ~~1~ ... PLAN-8.08 PAGE 1 OF 1 14-9D1 . . o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP ql 07 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-ql 13 """l r Respectfully submitted, ,/?'... ,.--./<' /' / .. I/.~t.:c/, . /-< L ../ Larry./E. Reed, Assistant Director Planning and Building Services ~~W: K ~ Michael R. Finn Associate Planner Attachment "A" - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance Attachment "B" - Findings of Fact Attachment "c" - Conditions of Approval Attachment "0" - Standard Requirements Attachment "E" - Initial Study Attachment "F" - Police Report Attachment "G" - Parcel Map, Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations Attachment "H" - Location Map ... ~..=.!J_:~ pt,M-1.D8 PAGE 1 OF 1 (4oSIO) r . . Otachment "A" a CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 4 9-17-91 14 l OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE """'l ATTACHMENT "A" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Cat@Qorv Municipal Prono~al Code General Plan Permitted Use Gas Station/Mini- Subject to market with off-site a CUP sale of beer and wine, 5-bay self serve car wash and auto related lease building N/A Height 28.5 feet 2 ~tories or 30 feet N/A Setbacks Inland Ctr. Dr. 10 feet 5 feet N/A "I" Street 5 feet 5 feet N/A Lot Coverage 22\ 70\ N/A Landscaping 9\ 5\ N/A (5,646;!:. ft2) (3,002 ft2) Parking 88'" 862 N/A '" 47 Standard Stalls, 4 Handicapped Stalls and 38 Compact Stalls. Only 30 percent of total required parking may be compact or 27 stalls; project is conditioned to convert 11 compact stalls into standard stalls. 2 Mini-Market 20 spaces (5,100 ft2 lease building 69 spaces (12,800 ft2 @ 5 percent of required total may be compact @ 1/250); Auto related + 1/200). Maximum of 30 or 27 compact spaces. ..oil CIT'I' OF 1M .....-0 --- PLAN-lJ18 PAGE' OF , (4.80) r . . o Attachment "A" o ..... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CllP Ql-07 4 9-17-91 15 .... ... OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE r ATTACHMENT "A" PARCEl. MAP MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Lot width 265 feet:!'. 230 feet:!'. Municipal General Code Plan Permitted N/A No Minimum NIA No Minimum NIA No Minimum N/A cateaory Proposal Permitted Use Parcel Map 2.077 acres Lot Size Lot Depth Frontage on dedicated streets All lots front on Title 18 NIA dedicated streets requires all lots front on dedicated streets pLAN-.a PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-901 ClTYCIf.............., --...... . . o Attachment "B" o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 """II ~ 4 9-17-91 16 FINDINGS OF FACT AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE """II FINDINGS OF FACT FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. The proposed 24-hour self-service gasoline station with mini-market, 24-hour self service 5-bay car wash and 12,800 square foot lease building for auto related services does not conforms to the objectives of the city's General Plan, in that it is a permitted use in the CG-1, Commercial General, General Plan land use designation, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which the project is located in that it is compatible with the nearby moving and storage on the north and the commercial land uses across Inland Center Drive to the south and is sufficiently distant from the nearest residences to preclude any adverse impacts. 3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare, in that the site can accommodate the proposed facility with the deletion of the western most set of pump islands and with the conversion of 11 compact parking stalls to standard parking stalls, in conformance with all applicable standards regarding setbacks, landscaping, parking, and internal circulation. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose any undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area, in that a traffic study was prepared for the proposal and reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer. Traffic mitigation has been included as Engineering Standard Requirements. 5. Based upon the above given Findings, the granting of this Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the peace, health and safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of San Bernardino. to.. ern CIF ... ......-0 --- PLAN-8.D8 PAGE 1 OF 1 (..eo) , ' o Attachment "B" o ~ ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 I FINDINGS OF FACT AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 17 ~ FINDINGS OF FACT FOR PARCEL MAP 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent Code and the General Plan, in that the the development standards specified for General land use designation. 2. All lots conform to the lot requirements of the Municipal Code in that the Code does not specify any minimum lot size, width or depth for lots in the CG-1 land use designation. The resultant parcel is large enough and suitable to accommodate the proposed facility in compliance with all applicable Municipal Code standards. with the Municipal proposal conforms to the CG-1, Commercial 3. The design of the parcel map and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that subdivisicn will occur according to the conditions of approval and standard requirements contained in this staff report. 4. All lots created abut upon a dedicated street of a width, namely "I" Street and Inland.Center Drive. The merging of the 8 lots into I lot will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 5. The legal owner of record has offered to make all required dedications as mandated by the City Public Works/Engineering Department and associated City Agencies. 6. Parcel Map No. 14067 is consistent with the provisions of both Title 18 and the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California in its conformance with Municipal Code standards, street frontage, and proposed usage. .. PLAN-I.D6 PAGE 10F , (4-10) 2!W!: ~ ..,.,,~ o Attachment "B" o F' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 4 9-17-91 18 I FINDINGS OF FACT AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ..... ALCOHOL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS 1. The introduction of alcoholic beverage sales at the proposed location will pose significant impacts to the surrounding land uses, in that the site is located within 81 feet of an existing elementary school, and could bring increased crime into an area that is already experiencing crime 19 percent above the average for other crime reporting districts in the City of San Bernardino. 2. The introduction of alcoholic beverage sales at the proposed location will not create an adverse impact on the surrounding traffic pattern nor will parking congestion be generated, in that removal of the eastern most gasoline pumps will improve on-site circulation and reduce the potential for congestion. 3. The proposed sale of alcoholic beverages will be within a development which is consistent with the objectives of the City's General Plan in that the proposed facility is permitted in the CG-1 land use district sUbject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 4. The proposal will contribute to an undue concentration of off-sale alcohol establishments in the area, in that the ABC census tract in which the proposal is located already has 5 existing off-sale establishments whereas only 2 are allowed. 5. There will be a detrimental effect on nearby residentially zoned neighborhoods considering the distance of the proposal to Urbita Elementary School (81 feet), to st. prophez Elis Greek Orthodox Church (approximately 1,056 feet) and from another off-sale establishment (11 store, 119 feet). .. ~~.~:x; PLAN-8.O& pAGE 1 OF 1 (4-10) . . o Attachment "c" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 9-17-91 PAGE 19 ... CONDITIONS ,.. to. S'l'AlmARD COIIDZ'l'ZOIlS 1. Minor modifications to the plan shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase or more than 10 percent of the square footage or a significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to (Planning commission and Development Review Committee) review and approval. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the 'Plans approved by the Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Director of Planning and Building Services. 2. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (4 copies) for the entire development to the Engineering Department with the required fee for approval, the landscape plans will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services and the Planning Department for review and approval. (Note: the issuance of a building permit by the Department of Building and Safety of the City of San Bernardino, does BQ:I waive these requirements/conditions.) No grading permits will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The design shall include, but not be limited to the following: X Street trees shall be planted on 30 foot center spacing unless otherwise indicated by the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services. The Parks Department shall determine the varieties and locations prior to planting. All trees shall be 24" box specimens. Trees are to be inspected by a Park Division representative Drior to planting. Planters shall be enclosed with concrete curbing. X The setbacks from the north , south , east ____, west ____ property line sharr-be bermed at a maximum 3: 1 slope and shall be planted with a tall fescue type turfgrass. A Landscape buffer zone shall be installed between facilities and street. X The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department) . ... PLAN-I.CII PaGE 1 OF 1 (...eo) ~.=..:== , . o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 20 ~ """'Ill 3. 4. 5. Subject to the Conditions of the Department of Parks and Recreation (attached). Trees, shrubs and qroundcover of a type and quality qenerally consistent or compatible with that characterizinq sinqle-family homes shall be provided in the front yard and that portion of the side yards which are visible from the street. All landscaped areas must be provided with an automatic irriqation system adequate to insure their viability. The landscape and irriqation plans shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. At all times the business will be operated in a manner which does not produce obnoxious noise, vibration, odor, dust, smoke, qlare, or other nuisance. A siqn proqram for the multi-tenant commercial/industrial center shall be approved by the Planninq Department prior to issuance of certificate of Occupancy. In the event that this approval is leqally challenqed, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant aqrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, aqents and employees from any claim, action, or proceedinq aqainst the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further aqrees to reimburse the city of any costs and attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obliqation under this condition. ... PLAN-8.111 PAGE 1 OF 1 C4-lO) elm' GO ... .--c --- o o r' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 4 9-17-91 21 .... CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAr. 6. A maximum of 27 of the total 89 required parking spaces (30 percent) may be compact parking stalls. A minimum of 62 standard parking stalls shall therefore be maintained. Five copies of a revised site plan reflecting the required parking shall be submitted and is subject to review and approval of the Planning Division. 7. The applicant pump islands circulation. shall delete the western most set of gasoline shown on the site plan to improve internal 8. The applicant/developer shall submit 5 sets of revised plans to the Planning Division showing the deletion of the western most set of gasoline pumps islands and the conversion of 11 of the compact parking stalls to standard parking stalls. The revised plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the Engineering Department and the Planning Division. 9. A minimum 100 foot setback from the 6-inch jet fuel pipeline shall be maintained for all structures intended for occupancy. 10. All underground fuel storage tanks, fuel lines, and gasoline lines shall comply with the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and County Environmental Health Services Regulations concerning air quality control, soil and ground water protection and fire protection. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits in these regards from the Fire Department and the San Bernardino Department of Environmental Health Services. 11. The liquefaction report required for the project by HC-676 shall also address ground subsidence. Said report shall be subject to review and approval by the Building and Safety Division and the Engineering Department. The project design shall incorporate any grading/ building requirements recommended by the report concerning subsidence into the grading/building plans for the project. 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/ developer shall obtain encroachment permits from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company or show proof of any existing access easement(s). Access to the site across the anCll''''~ ---- ....oil f'I.AM.I.IlO PAGE 1 OF 1 lUll) , ' o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM l4067/CUP 91-07 4 9-17-Q' ?? CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ... .... rail spur shall be subject to any requirements or conditions specified by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company in granting an encroachment permit or property easement. 13. A decorative block wall or wrought iron fence with dense landscaping shall be provided along the northern property line in open areas where buildings are not proposed. .. ::..:..~ ---, PlNH.lIIl PMiE' OF , (4<<l) - Attachment "D" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP Ql-07 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE q STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 9-17-91 23 ,. COMMERCYAL. YNDUSTRYAL 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 shall be in effect for a period of 12 months from the date of approval. However, if no development has been initiated at the end of the 12 month period, the application shall expire. Additional time may be approved upon request of the applicant prior to expiration of the 12-month period. Expiration. Date: September 17,1992. 2. ~ PARKING: c. d. ~ :ft't~__ ~~ - a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of 86 standard off-street parking spaces. (30% of which may De compact parking spaces). All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two indles of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned property provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in height when located within ten feet of the street line. b. Whenever an off-street.parking area is located across the street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equivalent landscape berm not less than thr.e feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure the required front setback landscaping. .... JlLAN.l.10 PAGE 1 OF , fMa) -. , . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 9-17-91 PAGE 24 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ~ 3 . REFUSE ENCLOSURES: 4. b. c. d. e. Ii... .,. _ ... ---.0 - . Whenever refuse bins are located within or adjacent to a parkinq area used by the public, they shall be enclosed by a decorative wall six feet in heiqht alonq the rear and sides and screened qate(s) six feet in heiqht alonq the front. Tbe enclosure shall not be placed within the required front or street side yard setback area. Exact location and size of refuse enclosures are to be determined by the Planninq Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent. WALLS: " a. Six-foot hiqh solid decorative walls shal~ be required on the north _, south _, east _, and west _ or peripheral _ property lines. (Only those marked with "X" or check mark apply). LANDSCAPING: Tbe intent and purpose of this section is to prevent trees and other landscapinq f%'OJll damaqinq public improvements. a. Street trees must be installed at a minimum of 30 feet on center. Varieti_ and exact location shall be determined by the Director of Parks and Recreetion. All required setbacks abuttinq a public riqht-of-way shall be landscaped (except for Walks and driveways which bisect or encroach upon the required landscape area). Four (4) copies of a landscape plan (includin'1 plant material specifications) shall be subIIlitted to the Enqineerin'1 Division for review and approval. All required landscapinq shall be protected frOlll parkinq areas and shall be provided with automatic sprinkler facilities which shall be maintained in an operative condition. Interior plantinq shall be required and maintained equal to at least five percent or ten percent of the open surfaced parkinq area excludinq the area of landscapinq strip required by subsection lib" and shall include at least one tree for every five spaces or major fraction thereof. Xeasure.ents shall be camputed f%'OJll the inside of perimeter Walls or .etback line.. ...,j ...........'0 PAGE 1 OF I 1440l , . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 .J STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 9-17-91 25 , """l f. The required setback(s) from the no~ _, soutb, _, east _, west ____ property l~ne shall be densely landscaped with mature trees, shrubs, and qroundcover. A -foot landscaped earthen berm shall be erected and maintained within the setback along the above indicated property line. 5. ILLOMINATION: a. All lighting directed away right-of-way. fixtures in from adjacent the parking ar_s shall be properties and the public " 6. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: a. Air conditioning and vent ducts shall be directed away from any adjacent residential uses, and all sides of the building shall be free of any external vents and mechanical equipment including, but not limited to, conduits and ducts. All building-supported roof equipment, ladders ducts) shall be enclosed architectural elements: shall not be permitted. c. All qround-supported equipment such as transformers and air conditioners shall be located wi thin the building, in underqround vaults, and/or behind approved landscaping AmI masonry walls. b. _chanica! equipment (including and air conditioning and vent within the building's primary independent screening devices All utility service boxes, shall be painted to match they are located. e. All existing overhead utility services and wiring shall be relocated underqround. d. connections and service lines the building exterior on which L f. All utility systems inCluding gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV shall be provided for underqround, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the structures. compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required (if applicable). ....,,----- - - PL.tNoI.l0 'AGE 1 OF 1 ,...0) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 26 7. Grading and revegetation shall be staged City Engineer in order to reduce the exposed to precipitation. s. During construction, the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control. as required by the amount of bare soil Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district; the maximum height of any building shall not exceed one story or 20 feet unless the Commission determines that due to unusual topographical or other features, such restrictive height is not practical. 9. No Certificate compliance wita provisions of the of Occupancy shall be issued prior to these Standard Requirements as well as all San Bernardino Municipal Code. 10. SIGNS: All signs shall be in conformance with San Bernardino Municipal Code Section 19.60. Four (4) copies of a plot plan and elevation of the sign drawn to scale shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the sign permit from the Building and Safety Department. ""CIJ"'~ ...~. 1 Pl..NM.10 PAGE1OJ, t4<<') . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 ~-11-91 27 ,.. ~ COMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11. A COIIIposite Development Plan (COP) shall be filed with the Enqineerinq, Planninq, and Buildinq and Safety Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processinq by the City pursuant to Ordinance No. MC-592. The COP shall provide additional survey and map information inclucUnq, but not limited to, buildinq criteria (e.q. setbacks), flood control criteria, seismic and qeoloqical criteria, environmental criteria and easements of record. The COP shall be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan", and contain a section entitled "Composite Development Plan Notes". The applicant shall have listed under the COP Notes section the followinq conditions or mitiqatinq measures required for the development of the . subj ect property: The property owner shall siqn a covenant runninq with the land aqreeinq that if the required landscapinq is not maintained, the city may enter on the the property and install and main- tain the required landscapinq and may lien the property for the costs. The covenant shall be siqned and recorded with the ~ounty of San Bernardino Recorder's Office prior to the J.ssuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. In addition, a landscape maintenance easement shall be filed with the Recor- der's Office, which qiv_ the City the riqht to enter the property and perform maintenance to the required landscapinq. 12. Parcel Hap No. 14067 shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission. However, if the final map has not been filed with the County Recorders Office at the end of the 24 month time period, the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planning Commission upon written request of the applicant if made 30 days prior to the expiration of the 24 month time period. Expiration Date: September 17, 1993 .. "'at...- - ..... PlMrNI.1D PAGE 1 OF 1 f6olOl - .J. - J3- ~ - - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/cup Q]-07 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 28 13. 14. 15. 16. sUbmit plana prepared by a Reqistered Building Designer, Architect or civil or structural Engineer. Submit a coaplete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a Registered Civil or structural Enqineer or Architect. Submit State ot calitornia Title 24 Energy calculation Forms tor )i:IlII.l:idtInCI~ non-residential buildinq8 including a signed compliance statement. Submit calculations and structural drawings, prepared by a Registered civil Structural Engineer or Architect, tor the tollowing items: CanODV Submit tloor plan of existing structure. Label all uses and existing materials of construction. 17. Submit five (5) complete sets of construction plans including: a. 3 Copy ot conditions. b. 3 Soils and/or liquetaction report. . 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. ...- c. 3 Energy calculations. d. 3 Structural calculation. . Submit a ~ (soils) (geology) (soils and geology With' liquetaction analysis) report prepared by a penon licenaed to do ao. Submit a aingle line drawiDq ot the electrical service. Show 811 equipment, conduit and wire siz_ lUld types. Show the aervice ground size and grounding electrode. Submit panel achedule(s) and electrical plana. Permit required for demolition of existiDq building(s) on site. Subai t a plan ot the heating, ventilating or air condi tion1nq ~_. (Clearly identify the location and rating ot the equi~t and the siz_ .. _tadal of all ducta, reqiaten and the location of all fire ".~). Show.una of providing -('banical ventilation as required by tile 1912 Unifora Building COda. ~lO _.w. _ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 4067/CUP 91-07 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 4 9-17-91 29 ,. ~ 23. SUbait gas pipe l_ds, siziDq calcu.latiorw &rid 18_tries. 1;4. ProVide a plot plan showinq the location of the propo.ed HVer .,..t_. submit a letter clearly incIicatinq the int.nded use of all area. of the builcUnq. Li.t the ..terial. to be u.ed and the proj.cts proc:lucecl qivinq the amount of each kept in the buildiDq. If the builcUnq 18 u.e! for .ore than one purpo.e, li.t all other u.... 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. \. Subait i.ometric plans of the cole! ane! hot vat.r and c!rain va.te ane! vent .yst.... Show compliance with Title 24 for the phywically handicavoed submit plarw approvee! by the County Beal th Departaent. Inc!icate ..thoc:ls of coapliance (exterior, interior party valla, c.ilinq) _ per atue!y, C.B.C., local for .ounc! attenuation floor/ceilinq _..ably, or State Law. Show coapliance with requi~nta' of hiqh fire area.. lor .tructures located within hiqh wincl area.: a. Deaiqn structure, incluc!iDq roof covariDq, aainq 20 p...f. wind loae!. City of San Bernarc!ino na,..oS a. certificate bole!er for Worker'. Coapeneation Inaurance. Aa....or'. Parcel Number. Contractor'. City license. Contractor'. State licens.. S.w.r capacity r1qhta froJl Water Departaent, 314-5093, ..il ~en. ... c::.: - ~_'CIl'I _ !l JIll - . . . CrTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT STANDARD .REQUIREMENTS CASE PM 14067/CUP 91-07 .&.UP IDA ITBo4 4 HEARING DATE 9-17-91 PAGE in ,... ..... 32. 33. SChool f... fro. Unified Scbool Dt.trict, 381-1179. ~er: Traffic fee from Traffic Deot. Anwar Waqdv. 384-5226 34. DEPOSIT: TnT' pl;:l1n t"!h,:.~k Mini Market 5,100 sq. ft. Canopy 4,644 sq. ft. Car Wash 1,900 sq. ft. Lease Bldg 12,800 sq. ft. = $856.00 = $560.50 = $505.00 =$2,323.00 Total : $ 4,244.50 , =-=. - ~ ~1O _.., _ o o DRC/ERC DATE t,-.? -71 CASE 9/-07 POL.J:CE DEPT C.J:TY OF SAN BERNARD.J:NO STANDARD REQU.J:REMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS i. SECURITY LIGHTING: / ). v 7. / l. ./' I. ./ ). /. , ,. ,/ ! . ./ Lighting levels on the exterior of the building are to pro- vide a minimum of ~ foot candle of minimum maintained il- lumination, evenly distributed, on the ground level from dusk until the termination of business each operating day. All exterior doors to buildings shall be equipped with an illumination device capable of providing a minimum of ' one foot candle of maintained illuminated at ground level during hours of darkness. Aisles, passageways, and recesses related to and within the project~omplex shall be illuminated with an intensity of.a~,. least ~ foot candles at the ground level during the hours of darkness. ~. Open parking lots and carports shall be provided with a m~n~mum .aintained ~ foot candle of light evenly distrib- uted on the parking surface during the hours of darkness. All exterior lighting devices are to be inaccessible to common reach or cli.bing and shall be protected by weather and vandalism resistant covers. All exterior lighting shall be projected so as to not cast light onto adjoining prop- erties. Interior night lighting shall be maintained in those areas that are visible from the street (ground floor only). There shall be a minimum of 20 foot candles of illumination per square foot of surface area adjacent to gas pumps. Parking lot poles will be shake proof so that lights cannot be damaged by shaking the pole. Light fixtures shall be positioned in such a manner so that "stray" light does not affect adjoining property owners. Interior night lighting shall be maintained in those areas that are visible from the street (ground floor only). I. ./ JOORS, LOCKS, AND WINDOWS: Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, solid wood or metal doors shall be constructed or protected as follows: . . o o DRC/ERC DATE CASE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD REQUIREMENTS / . I POLICE DEPT B) Hollow metal doors shall be constructed a minimum equivalent to sixteen U.S. gauge steel and have suf- ficient reinforcement to maintain the designed thick- ness of the door when an~ locking device is installed such as reinforcement being able to restrict collapsing of the door around the locking device. C) The above doors shall contain a 190 degree view angle door viewer. Except when double cylinder deadbolts are utilized, an~ glass utilized within 40" of any door locking mechanism shall consist of laminated glass, tempered glass, wired glass or plastics. All swinging exterior wood and steel doors shall be equipped as follows: - ...... A) A single or double door shall be equipped with a double or single deadbolt. The bolt shall have a minimu. pro- jection of 1" and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack. No double c~linder deadbolt locks shall be installed on the front door. B) The deadbolt shall have an embedment of at least 1" into the strike receiving the projected bolt. The c~linder shall have a c~linder guard, a minimum of five pin tumblers, and shall be connected to the inner por- tion of the lock b~ connecting screws of at least 1/4" in diameter. The recoaaendation does not appl~ when panic hardware is required or an equivalent device is approved b~ the Building Code. C) The strike plate shall be a minimum of 3" in height and shall be secured to the jamb with a minimum of four 2-1/2" screws. Double doors shall be equipped as follows: A) The active leaf of double doors shall be equipped with metal flush bolts hav'.:lg a minimum embedment of 5/8" into the head and thr'1 ::nold of the door frame. Double doors shall have an a~:ragal constructed of steel, a minimum of .125" thic~. which will cover the opening between :he doors. This astragal shall be a minimum of 2" wide and extended a minimum of 1" be~ond the edge of the door to which it is attached. The astragal shall be attached to the outside of the active door by means of welding or with nonremovable bolts spaced apart on not more than 10" centers. o o DRC/ERC DATE CASE POLICE DEPT CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD REQUXREMENTS '. ./ .; I. ./ All exterior hinged doors are to open/swing outward. Hinges for out-swinging doors shall be equipped with non-' removeable hinge pins or a mechanical inner lock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. Windows A) All moveable windows shall be equipped with a locking device and shall be constructed in a fashion to re strict them from being lifted out of their tracks when in the closed position. ,-' B) All moveable windows shall also be equipped with an auxiliary locking device which prevents the window from being slid open (either vertically or horizon- tally) open while in the closed position. - ..... " Garage type doors: (rolling overhead, solid overhead, swinging, sliding, or accordion style) A) The above described doors shall conform to the follow- ing standards: 1. Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of 5/16" in thickness with the locking hardware being at- tached to the support fraaing. 2. Aluminum doors shall be a minimum thickness of .0215" and rivet together a'minimum of 18" on cen- ter along the outside seaas. There shall be a full width horizontal beaa attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot or pedestrian access door framing within 3" of the strike area of the pilot or pedestrian access door. 3. Fiberglass doors shall have panels a minimum den- sity of 6 ounces per square foot from the bottom of the door to a height of 7' and panels in residential structures shall have a density of not less than 5 ounces per square foot. B) Where sliding or accordion doors are utilized, they shall be equipped with guide tracks which shall be de- signed so that the door cannot be removed from the track when in the closed and locked position. C) Doors that exceed 16' in width shall have 2 lock _~__":....:__ __":_4._.. ..:~ +\...- ~............ A....ae ......t- av....aa..-f lQ'_ o o DRC/ERC DATE CASE POLICE DEPT CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD REQUIREMENTS I. ./ ADDRESS I. ./ / a single bolt may be used if placed in the center of the door with the locking point located either in the floor or in the door frame header. D) Overhead doors shall be equipped with slide bolts which shall be capable of utilizing padlocks with a minimum 9/32" shackle. 1. Slide bolt assemblies shall have a frame a minimum of .120" in thickness, a bolt diameter a minimum of 1/2", and protrude at least 1 1/2" into the re- ceiving guide. A bolt diameter of 3/8" maY~be used in a residential building. 2. Slide bolt assemblies shall be attached to the door with bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior. Rivets shall not be used to attach such assemblies. ,. . -. ;." E) Padlocks used with exterior mounted slide bolts shall have a hardened steel shackle a minimum of 9/32" in diameter with heel and toe locking and a minimum 5 pin tumbler operation. The key shall be nonremovable when in an unlocked operation. F) Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum of five pin tumbler operation with the bolt or locking bar extendinl into the receiving guide a minimum of 1". Common walls shall be as sound proof as possible. All roof open in,s givin, access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates. stamped metal or shall be alarmed and meet with the approval of the police department. NUMBERS Roof top address numbers shall be provided. They shall be a minimum of 3' in len,th and 2' in width and of contrasting color to the back,round. Numbers shall be placed parallel to the street address as assigned. The project shall display street address numbers placed in a prominent position as near the street as practical. Numbers shall be a minimum of 6" in height and of a contrasting color to the back,round. All individual units shall be clearly identified by numbers, letters, or a combination thereof. These numbers and o o DRC/ERC DATE CASE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD REQUIREMENTS POLICE DEPT -'" - letters shall be a minimum of 6" in height and of a contras- ting color to the background. All numbering of units shall be in a sequential, logical order. ACCESS CONTROLS: 2. ./ / 3. An access control override device shall be provided for use by police department personnel to gain i..ediate access. " Perimeter fencing or cross fencing shall be installed to prevent criminal movement or activity. The exterior business walls shall be posted with Municipal Code Section 9.52.070 relative to trespassing. . " The placement of outside public telephones shall be re~' stricted to an area i..ediately adjacent to the front of the store/ ~ , 4. RETAIL/CONVENIENCE STORES ./ 5. / 5. ./- ./ / / Lockable cold beverage (beer) cases shall be locked at 2:00 a.m. No alcoholic beverages shall be displayed or stored in the front 2/3 of the custoaer area. Ice machines shall not be installed in front of store win- dows. The interior cashier/sales counter shall is visible from the building exterior. i:iJs,ide,;J;.he cOlln~halJ. beel_atee! a tm;"""bod-;;-~th_ bU}l~e)ll: ''---'' -- be located so T~ JI~r..Jar.ea. .. f r ~ it . Windows and counter/cash register area will not contain dis- plays/advertisements that block the visibility of the cashier from the outside of the store. A photo-electric be.. across the entry door shall be installed to audibly notify or ring when customers enter the store. Utilization of outside intercom speakers is prohibited. _0_ o CrTY OF SAN BERNARDrNO DRC/ERC DATE CASE POLrCE DEPT STANDARD REQUrREMENTS o. ALARM SYSTEMS / If the units are alarmed or wired for an alarm system, the buyer is to be notified to contact the Police Department for an alarm permit. OTHER REQUIREMENTS , The placement of machinery (compressor eqUipment) shall be away from residential areas to abate the intensity of noise. .-. ..... ;.' o o CXTY OF SAN BERNARDXNO DRC/ERC DATE CASE STANDARD REQUXREMENTS POLXCE DEPT 1. ADDITIONAL REQUIRlKENTS: ,/' C.O po"?' ..ec~-;:-:;c . :.~L 0;1:-J - ~~ ~t::':-""'- S~.;~4.lE t1~/{.. Pv~r' s~~~ /~"""A"::: ",~....-z. ~ ~/:/~ "..... - , ".K-/v<:r ~"r_ ~AC.c...S "/ /AlL"'""/~ tC!&;-""'e-""/~ /A'LC- EfJ':= ;- ~ . / crt!!.... . , - ,. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO c c.I CASE t?/-O~ HEARING DATE 6-,2t')-rJ REVIEWED BY ~ STANDARD REQUIREMENTS PIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS GWERAL REQUIREMENTS: ..,..)< Provide one extra set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check. (] Contact Fire Depllrtment for specific or detailed requirements - I.PORTAlIT. ~ The developer shall provide for adequate Fire Flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Fire Flow shall be based ,....... on square footage, construction features and exposure information as supplied by the developer and may be taken from two hydrants. I~t) t;/1/ Yt'7)/,e'//P' $Y <<J#-"7d ptFrZ' ACCESS: ) (] Provide two different routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, all-weather. [1 Provide an access roadway to each buildinlZ for fire apparel"!'. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 2o-feet of unobstructed width. I] Extend roadway to within lSD-feet of all portions of the exterior valls of all single-story buildings. [] Extend roadway to within 50-feet of the exterior walls of all mul;.iple-story buildings. [J Provide "No PARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" (All caps). "M.C. Sec. 15.16". [J Dead-end streets shall not exceed SOo-feet in length and shall have a minimum 35-foot radius turnaround. t] The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. SITE: l] All acress roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction. [J Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than ISO-feet from the curb line. No fire hydrant should be within 40-feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Barrel type, with one 2,-inch and one 4-inch outlet. and aporoved by the Fire Departmpnt. Fire hydrants are to be protected from damage by providing suitable traffic barriers. The area around the fire hydrant shall be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by painting an 8-inch wide, red stripe for 15-feet in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles. Suitable "NO PARKING" signs are required. ~ Public fire hydrants shall be provided along streets at~feet intervals for commercial and multi-residential areas and at /""-.. 50o-feet intervals for residential areas. Installation shDI'Conform to City specifications and be installed prior to combustible construction or storage. ,. l. BUILDING: [J The address of the structure, in six inch numerals, shall be installed on the building or in other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage street. The color of the numbers shall contrast with color of the background. (] Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit which it services. (] Fire extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 10 B/C. Minimum distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75-feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher. ~ All buildings, other than residential over 5,000 square feet, shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system, designed /'..... to NFPA standards. Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction on the system. Tenant improvements in all sprinkJered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to construction. ....L" Provide an automatic fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department, prior to installation. ,r __ Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shall be required at curb line. =================================================================================================================--=== ). T. I. NOTE: The applicant must requ~ in writing, any change in these or other requirements. ADDlTIONALINFORMATION:U/.~$t't SUAH/7" ~~.r ;:t; /'l,;rl'" PGP?: ,P;;(! :;:";VS7')I;1U"A'77i),A) OF Nfl. .s-~'/(AtI=~ ~Jj. OKrA'/AJ J?rlf)u/~ELJ &.;:r5. @?#E FHE~U:'tF1CI{"y nEt'. ,IN'vr-eJF' $"t:(J/r~N SA/Ala: Jl!:"E ,4~-97'"C-P OAJ r#F 4u,lrJ/,Or t:Jr 7"#tr Jrq/~P/AI~ AAJP Ct!" /AlflFP ~A.lP y;~;~(.t!' ~/? ~"c rqr~ Pts;;'F.uf/~{:. rr~p.r.. FPB 170 7/&9 , . CITY OF SAN ARDINO PUBLIC CASE .1..... r.IIP Q]-07 STANDARD REQUREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAG q q-H-ql ,. NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the appllcant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Oivision. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainage and Flood Control All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer; which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. A 1 oca 1 dra i nage study will be requ i red for the pro ject. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mi t i ga te downs tream i mpac ts or protect the deve 1 opment sha 11 be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. _ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. _ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. _ Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. ThlS drain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclusively .show that the drain is not needed to protect your development or mitigate downstream impacts. -:L. All dra i nage from the deve 1 opmen t approved public drainage facility. drainage facilities and easements satisfaction of the City Engineer. X Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to maintain compliance with the City's NPOES Storm Water Discharge Permit requirements. shall be If not shall be directed feasible, provided to an proper to the t o 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKI/INQR. CASE CUP 91-07 - , . STANDARD REQlIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE R 4 9-17-91 Grading X If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engi neer and a gradi ng permi t wi 11 be requi red. The gradi ng plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. X , '. X .. X I. X '. X 5,000 cubi c yards of earthwork is proposed, a will be required and the grading shall be accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform If more than grading bond supervi sed in Building Code. A 1 i quefacti on report is requi red for the si te. Thi s report must be submi tted and approved pri or to issuance of a gradi ng permi t. Any gradi ng requi rements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approva 1 if reci proca 1 dra i nage, acces s, sewer. and/ or park i ng is proposed to cross lot lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines. The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grad i ng plan. or on- site improvement plan, if practical. A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain landscaping within the following areas: Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided for the Landscape Maintenance District. .. CITY OF SAN ARDINO PUBLIC CASE 1/1DIGIl CUP 91-07 - STANDARD REQUREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE 4 9-17-91 Utilities: X Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in -accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV. Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer -facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be -constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. X Utility services shall be placed underground and easements -provided as required. X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site ---on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-601 (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65 (Non-subdivisions). X Existing utiHties which interfere with new construction shall be -relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. X Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be -maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where practical. X A "Communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets within and adjacent to this project. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City and its pri mary use sha 11 be for Cable TV i nsta 11 ed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernardino. L r: CITY OF SAN BE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS I/DIQIl CUP 91-07 - AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAG 4 9-H-91 Street Improvement and Dedications: X All public streets within and adjacent to ,the development shall be -improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance ~ith the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street -right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-Way (Ft.) "I" STREET 44' Curb Li ne (Ft.) 32' 40' (MINIMUM) INLAND CENTER DRIVE 50' (MINIMUM) X Driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Std. No. 204, Type II. Westerly drive approach on "I" Street shall be 36' wide. x An Encroachment Permi t wi 11 be requi red from the SPRR for work within the railroad right-of-way. Proof of crossing rights at driveway will be required. X Restripe Inland Center Drive from Senic Drive to "I" Street to provide one lane each direction and a 2-way turn lane. X Improve Inland Center Drive to provide an acceleration and deceleration lane as approved by the City Engineer. X Install "NO PARKING" signs on the North side of Inland Center Drive from "I" Street to the Easterly project boundary. . - 11> o 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/_. CASE CUP 91-07 STANDARD REOlIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 9-17-91 F\ ReQuired Engineering Permits: O. x Grading permit (if applicable). On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), includes landscaping. 1. x 2. x Off-site improvements construction permit. Applicable Engineering Fees (Fees subject to change without notice) Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map - $1,000.00 plus $30.00 per lot or parcel. Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 3% and 2.5%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of off-site improvements. 4. X Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 1:t and 1:t, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of on-site improvements, including landscaping. 3. X 5. X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit reQuired) - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. 6. X Dra i nage fee. Exact amount of fee sha 11 be determi ned by Department of Planning and Building Services at time of application for building permit - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. 7. X Traffic system fee in the approximate amount of $60.000.00 Exact amount shall be determined by the City Trafflc Englneer at time of application for building permit. 8. X Contribute $20,000.00 toward future signalization of the intersection of Inland Center Drive and "I" Street. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 9. X A parcel map shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines. *Estimated construction cost is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engineer. JI. ti J sa.onardino City Water Department 0 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 3w of rlans: # ~ U r \..\". q I .- 01 Date: I ."'\"" /"-~ .I.,lo _._ .ocation: Iole. r~ U.c'lt... .l.....d\ ...1.'t? ( ~ v- - ~ ~ Approved: rypeOfconstruction:CAI~. ~,.~~- ~r .oC"~.~ ~ ~tD,,1 Denied: )wner/Developer:t:-~. ~!7.lI-r:? "\ Ci.A.:~ \"-\<3-'t" .~......) Continued: ENGINEERING: Name:~ JII.{~~',,^~ Date:~ I.'~ P.S.I. efb -~ -~ ;:,..\ _. ~ Size of Main Adjacent to the Project It'" 1[1. IIJ" ~ 1 ,..It.;i. /'Z'4 &rt. '1"'fo'lI ^ ~ c"Jl.. ~ ! . JX Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. o Off-site Water Facilities Required to Meet Peak Flow Demand. ~ _ t I. =- Comments: ~#...- ~ .".~~<... "'::-'A" (J~ ~hlP .-' 'Z ~ ~I o Subject to the Rules & Regulations of the Water Department in effect at the time of Application for Water Service. o This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees/Conditions will be Determined by their Engineering Department. WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name: ~ Date: ~ ~R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. ~ ~1lV LAoltlD<.u:- ..,; ~.~ - LJ Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. :-l Air Gap Required at Service Connection. LJ No Backflow Device Required. I ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name:~"" "- \J~ ~...A Date:~ '. ~ Industrial Waste Permit Required by Environmental Control Officer. ,.~ Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer. '. ~Pre-treatment Required by Environmental Control Officer. '. jZ. No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed Without Prior Approval. C Approved by Environmental Control Officer\ SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name:~\... \~~ Date:~"J [] No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. "&"Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the City Water Department for the Amount of Gallons Per Day. Equivalent Dwelling Units: __ Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. . .x. Proof of Payment Must be Submitted tothe Building & Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit. 'reakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: -?A \bz.. ,."", 1{: ------...~ {- '" f-" ~1\oO ,~ \...h~,-~~~ ~_~e;("~ r~ ~ 1 .", '\"t-J~~~.~Tt?~~It.D.>:: WATA-3.OC t"'OISAN.~ ClNTfIAl._'IOGSfIWlCES, IIJ. - ~ . ........ .. u CITY. OF SAN 8 ARDINO PUBLIC CASE 1/1NGIl PM 140{.7 - STAND4RD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAG 4 9-17-91 45 Utilities 1. X Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City code, City Standard and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV. Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer faci- lities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the a~ea. Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be con- structed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. X Utility services shall be placed underground and easements pro- vided as required. X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accor dance with Section 19.20.030 (non-subdivisions) or 19.30.110 (SUbdivisions) of the Development Code. X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engin- eer and approved by the Ci ty Engi neer wi 11 be requi red. Thi s plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where practical. L5. X A .communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets with- in and adjacent to this project. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernar- dino. .2. ~ .4. l .t1 ... J - . CITY OF SAN ARDINO PUBLIC ORKI/IENGIR. CASE f?n /4Cb7 - STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE A 4 Q-17-c}1 Mapping X A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. )( Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and set- backs, geologic mapping and arCheological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-592. I.prove.ent Co.pletions ~ Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire pro- ject sha 11 be comp 1 eted, subject to the approva 1 of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. If the requi red improvements are not comp 1 eted pri or to record- ation of the Final/Parcel Map, an improvement secLlrity accom- panied by agreement executed by the developer and the City will be required. 9. X I f the requ ired improvements are not proposed to be comp 1eted prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, a deferred improvement agreement in accordance with Section 19.30.160 of the Development Code will be required. If the agreement is approved, an improvement certificate shall be placed on the Parcel Map stating that the requi red improvements wi 11 be comp 1 eted upon develop- ment. Applicable to Parcel Maps consisting of 4 or less parcels only. 6. 7. 8. o. X Street light energy fee to pay .cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. All rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from the following streets: .1 - . . CITY OF SAN HONARDINO PUBLIC c~'l~ STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 4 . . HEARING DATE ~ Street Improvement and Dedications: XAll public streets within and adjacent to ~he development shall be ----improved to include combination-curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights. sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. ~ For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street ----right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-Way (Ft.) 44' Curb Line (Ft.) . .. I 5 "TAEeT INLJIJND ~~. S'o' 32' 4C' '. ~ CcNST1Wcr IJ IIItNDJCltp !?/lmp 117 me NtJlZ.THE'I95i 41AN8t.. II .. "1= .$~I.AN[) ceJJre1e DlaVl? AND .r ~T AND JJet>lt:A7E' SUrF/ClAlT .If?t61ff-1lp- wRy 7D 11eetJn1P'1~7'E 71If; ~. l - ~ "CITY.OF SAN STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ORK./...... CASE p.m, /4067 AGENDA ITEM 4 HEARING DATE 9-17-91 lltl Required Engineering Per.its: Grading permit (if applicabl,.). On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), includes landscaping. XOff-site improvements construction permit. Applicable Engineering Fees (Fees SUbject to change without notice) X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map - $1,000.00 plus $30.00 per lot or parcel. 26. X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 3S and 2.5S, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of off-site improvements. 24. 25. Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - IS and IS, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of on-site improvements, including landscaping. Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required) - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. Drainage fee in the amount of Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of Exact amount shall be determined by the City Trafflc time of application for Building Permit. Sewer connection fee in the amount_of Eng1 neer at *Estimated construction cost is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engineer. \. ^ Attachment "E" 1"\ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ""lI INITIAL STUDY ... ,. Initial study for Environmental Impacts For Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 Project Description/Location: To construct a 24-hour self-service gasoline station with mini-market, a 24 hour self-service 5-bay car wash and a 12,800 square foot lease building for automotive related services. Located on 2.1 acres at the northeast intersection of Inland Center Drive and "1" Street. Date June 20, 1991 Prepared for: Nicholas Tavag1ione 3545 central, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92506 Prepared by: Michael R. Finn Associate Planner City of San Bernardino Planning Department 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 ~"=I!rL=--= ... PLAN-8.07 PAGE 1 Ol' 1 (4-10) , . o o INITIAL STUDY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-07 Introduction This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07. It contains an evaluation of potential adverse impacts that can occur if the project is developed. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a project must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and it is not exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a project not exempt from CEQA qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared. The following components constitute the Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07: Initial Study for 1- 2. 3. 4. Project Description Ervironmental Setting Environmental Impact Checklist Discussion of Environmental Measures Technical Reports prepared for Conclusion Evaluation and Mitigation 5. 6. the proposed project Combined, these components constitute the complete Initial Study for Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07. Pro;ect Descrintion Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 is a request to construct a 24 hour self-service gasoline station with mini-market, 24-hour self-service 5 bay car wash and a building with 12,800 square feet of auto related lease space. The site is roughly triangular in shape, consisting of 9 parcels totalling 2.077 acres. The site is presently designated IL, Industrial Light, which would not allow the proposed use; the designation permits manufacturing and low intensity industrial uses with a modest percentage (15\) of service related uses. However, the applicant has also filed a request to amend the General Plan land use designation of the site to CG-1, Commercial General. The CG-1 land use designation permits a wide range of commercial and retail services, including the uses proposed under Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07. It is assumed that the General Plan Land Use Designation of the project site is CG-1 to allow processing of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 as requested by the applicant. . . o o Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 Initial study June 20, 1991 Environmental Bettina The property is relatively flat and is devoid of vegetation, showing signs of recent discing for weed abatement. The site is bordered on the west by "I" street, and on the south by Inland Center Drive and a rail spur owned by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company. Interstate 215 is located just east of the site. Adjoining land uses include single-family homes fronting on "I" Street and a restaurant and storage facility adjacent to the offramp on the north, mixed industrial and commercial land uses across Inland Center Drive on the south, and single-family homes across "I" Street on the west. Urbita Elementary School is located across "I" Street to the northwest. The site is located in an area of potential ground subsidence and high liquefaction susceptibility. A six-inch high pressure fuel pipeline, carrying JP-4 jet fuel to Norton Air Force Base, runs along the southern boundary of the site, approximately 10 feet north of the centerline of the rail spur. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ~ A. BACKGROUND Application Number: COl'luliirJr{Al.. v.~ ?ERNlr r4C. C\\-C' ProjlldOescription: TO col'i~';tR.W;;T A ~t.{ - HOI..lR '5at=-seRVf C.~s..~iN€. s\,A-"T\Ol'l. A 2'-1 -Ho..tR 5- 8-4" 5~Lr=-se~\le eM<. w~H ,l.1..fu A , 10, ~OO 5~€. Fc~\ l...e;)6i" Bill....i)trJ& FOR AtlTD Pa.f1ff.D uses. . Location: ~ot:m'l E;A5\ c.c;R.~...K 6((" ,lJL....\:r,\ ~ ~rre.R UIl.\V~ A", 'c . " _I €;{R.~l Environmental Constreints Areas: \- \ Q v. €.r ~,l DI'i .. 6W3~i Oe;Nc.C I "" - , ~0l-+ ht~-L V\f("-i-i N.':"" General Plan Designation: i L. INv,~.S\R\Ai...- i-i~i+i (~~5i.-v 1"0 . 6e AYV..W~D '\0 C6--\ LuMM&Q.C,,,,,--(,.E.Nf:RAi..- 6'1 &~'W-oCj) , Zoning Designation: Ii-, 1~D\)..!:;\~HA;L L\b--\4T(~e\)'\o Be AMENL:lO 10 CC..-l C.ornI'\1.62.CiAL ~ei2At- B--/ G-PA qO-Dtll ~ . B. ENVIRONMENTAL.MPACTS Explain enswelS, wherellpplOpriate. on a separate attached sheet. No Maybe ';( X X )< 1. Earth Re80UICH Will the proposaJ resutt in: a. Earth movement (cut and/or fUI) 01 10,000 cubic yards Dr mora? Ves b. Development and/or grading on a slope glllal8r than 15% natural grade? c. Development within the A1quist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0 - Geologic & Seismic, Figure 47. of the City's General Plan? d. ModHication of any unique geologic Dr physical feature? e. Development within areas defined for high potential lor water Dr wind erosion as identHied in SlIdion 12.0. Geologic & Seismic, Figura 53, of the City's General Plan? x X f. ModHication of a chennel, creek Dr river? .. ~&.:r== PUlNoU6 PAGE 1 OF _ 111-10) JJ .L !II - - , . g. Development wnhin an area subject to landslides, Yes No Maybe mudslides, liquefaction or other similar hazards as identified in Section 12.0 - Geologic & Seismic, )( Figures 48, 52 and 53 01 the cny's General Plan? h. OIher? ~&tJT\~ ~t> ~\~ x: 2. Air "-Urcu: Will the proposal resu~ in: a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient X air qualny as defined by AQMD? b. The creation 01 objectionable odors? )( c. Development wnhin a high wind hazard area as Identffied in Section 15.0 - Wind & Fire, Figure 59, 01 the cny's X General Plan? 3. Water Rnourcea: Will the proposal resu~ in: a. Changes in absoI'ption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount 01 surface runoll due to '><' mnperme~surfaces? b. Changes in the course or IIow 0I11ood waters? X' c. Discharge Into surface waters or any a~eration )( 01 surface water qualny? d. Change in the quantny 01 qualny ul ground water? 'X e. Exposure 01 people or property to Ilood hazards as identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map, Communny Panel Number 060281 - _ , and Section 16.0 - >< Flooding, Figure 62, ollhe cny's General Plan? I. Other? X 4. Biological Rnourcn: Could the proposal r8Su~ in: a. Development wnhin the Biological ResoUR:8S Management Overlay, . identffied in SectIon 10.0 . Natural R8IOUR:8S, FlIlure 41, oIlhe cny's X General Plan? b. Change In 1he number 01 any unique, rare or endangered species 01 plants or their habitat including i- stands 01 trees? c. Change in the number 01 any unique, rare or X endangered species 01 animals or their habnat? d. Removal 01 viable, maluretrees? (6. or greater) )( e. OIher? 'f... 5. No"': Could the proposal resutt in: a. Development 01 housing, hntth care facilities, schools, Ubraries, religious faclltties or other "noise. Nnattive UNS in are. where existing or future nolle levels excnd &rI Ldn 01 65 dB(A) estarior &rid &rI Ldn 01 45 dB(A) interior as identified in Section 14.0. Noise, FlIlures 14-6 and 'X 14-13 oIlhe Ctty's General Plan? =n:~.~.:it.ti PJ..AH.I.G8 PAGE2OF_ (11"') ^ 1"\ ,. .... 10. Public ServlcH: Will the proposallmpacl the following Ves No Maybe beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X c. Schools (i.e., attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? '>< d. Parks or other recreational facil~ies? X e. Medical aid? X f. Solid Waste? X g. Other? X 11. Utllltlea: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adeqU8le levels of seIVica or require the construction of new facil~ies? 1. Natural gas? y 2. Electricity? Y 3. Water? X 4. Sewer? "l- S. Other? Y. b. Resu. in a disjointed pattem of utility extensions? Y' c. Require the construction of new facil.? X 1 2. Aeethetlca: a. Could the proposal ruu. in the obstruction of any y scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be datrimental X to the surrounding arn? c. Other? ,~ . 13. CUltural Reaourcea: Could the proposal resu. in: a. The alteration or deetruction of a p,rahistoric or historic archaeological .~e by development ~hin an lIIChaeoIogical ..nsitive area as identified In Section y 3.0 - Historical, FllIure 8, of the City's General Plan? b. Alteration or deatruction of a historical an, atructure X or object as listed In the CIty'. Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? c. Other? Y... ro::..s:.-==== PI.AN-8.08 PAGE. OF _ (l1-l1O) - .. ' . 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Ad Slates that n any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a signnicant eIIect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Yes No Maybe a. Does the projec:l have the potential to degrade the quality 01 the environment, substantially reduce the habbt 01 a fiah or wildllle species, cause a fish or wildllle population to drop below se_ sustaining levels, th""en to ellminale a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range 01 a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples 01 the major periods d California history or prehistory? b. Does the projec:l have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage 01 long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on 1he environment is one which lICCUIS in a rellllively brief, definitive period 01 time while long-term Impacts will endure well into the future.) >< x c. Does the project heve impacts which are individually limftad, but cumulatively considerable? (A projec:l may impact on two or more seperete rIlSOurcas where the Impact on each resource Is relatively small, but where the eIIect 01 the total 01 those impllClS on the environment Is sign_icanl) d. Does the project have environmental eIIects which will cause .ubelantlal adverse eIIl1C1S on human beings, efther directly or indirectly? x ~ C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUAtiON AND MITIGAtiON MEASURES (Altach sheels as neellsary.) ~~E: ATlAGrl€.b. crrrCIJ~_~ f'lNl.8.Oll PAGUOF _ (l1.oD) II L 1 o o Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 June 20, 1991 C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Earth Resources g. The proposed project is located within an area of high liquefaction potential. The composition of underlying soils in combination with high water table may present conditions favorable for liquefaction given a major seismic event. Potential impacts include near surface or surface ground failure resulting in property damage and/or structural failure. Engineering Department Standard Requirements concerning the submission of an approved liquefaction report for the site prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, and the incorporation of any grading/ building requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report into the grading/ building plans, will reduce potential impacts resulting from liquefaction to an insignificant level. h. The project is located in an subject to potential ground subsidence. According to the General Plan, potential subsidence within this area may be as great as 5 to 8 feet in groundwater is depleted from the Bunker Hill-San Timoteo Basin. Since 1972, the San Bernardino Municipal Water District has maintained groundwater levels from recharge to percolation basins which, in turn filters back into the alluvial groundwater deposits. Project Conditions of Approval requiring the above mentioned liquefaction report to also address ground subsidence, and incorporate any grading/ building requirements recommended by the report concerning subsidence into the grading/building plans will reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 3. Water Resources a. The proposed development will cause an increase in impermeability and the rate and amount of surface water runoff. Engineering Department Standard Requirements concerning the conveyance of drainage and runoff to approved public drainage facilities will apply. 6. Land Use a. The proposal will result in a change in the land use as designated under the General Plan. The site is presently designated IL, Industrial Light, which does not permit the proposed facility; the IL designation permits manufacturing and low intensity industrial uses with only a small percentage (15\) of supporting retail and personal service commercial uses. As previously mention,) the applicant has filed a request to amend the General Plan land use - D ~ o o Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 June 20, 1991 C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES designation of the site to CG-1, Commercial General. The CG-1 land use designation permits a wide range of commercial and retail services, including the uses proposed under the present conditional use permit application. Potential impacts resulting from the change in land use from IL to CG-1 will be addressed under the application for General Plan Amendment (GPA No. 90-09). 7. Man-Made Hazards a. The facility will store and dispense gasoline. All underground fuel storage tanks, fuel lines, and gasoline dispensers are required to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and County Environmental Health Services regulations regarding air quality control, soil and ground water protection, and fire prevention. Potential uses of the lease building could involve the transport, storage and use of hazardous materials in the form of oil, solvents, etc., normally associated with automotive type uses. Conditions of Approval requiring the lease. holders transporting, storing or using hazardous materials to obtain a hazardous material handler permit and hazardous waste generator permit from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services will reduce potential impacts to an insignificant level. b. Operation of the carwash may result in the release of toxins or hazardous materials contained in wash soaps or from the vehicles being washed. To preclude the release of any hazardous substances or toxins, Conditions of Approval have been added requiring the installation of on-site drains. These drains shall be designed to contain any runoff created by the carwash in the course normal operation. Any release of hazardous substances into the sewer systems will be handled by the Environmental Officer at the San Bernardino City Water Department. The following City of San Bernardino Water Department Standard Requirements are applicable and will reduce potential hazards: 1. An industrial waste permit shall be required if any type of hazardous materials are to be released. 2. A Grease Trap (Sand Trap) shall be installed. 3. No Regenerative Water without prior approval Officer. Softeners may be installed of the Environmental Control o o Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 June 20, 1991 C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES To safeguard water quality in existing mains, an R.P.P. Backflow Device shall be water service connection per City of San Department standard Requirements. d. The site is bordered on the south by a 6-inch high pressure fuel pipeline which carries JP-4 jet fuel to Norton Air Force Base. A rupture of the jet fuel pipeline and any ensuing fire could result in the exposure of people to potential safety hazards. Since the pipeline parallels the Southern Pacific rail spur, the most likely cause of pipeline rupture would be a train derailment. The rail spur leads to the warehouse distribution facilities north of Inland Center Drive less than a one half mile to the east. Trains using the rail are therefore likely to be traveling at an extremely slow speed. The rail in the vicinity of the project is straight for several thousand feet both to the east and west. Derailment is therefore considered unlikely. Project Conditions of Approval requiring a setback of 100 feet for all structures intended for occupancy will help to reduce potential hazards to an insignificant level. water pipes and required at the Bernardino Water 9. Transportation/Circulation d. The proposal will alter the present patterns of area traffic circulation. A traffic impact report prepared for the project by J. F. Davidson and Associates and was reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer. The following Engineering Conditions of Approval will reduce potential impacts to an insignificant level: 1. Improve Inland Center Drive to provide a westbound acceleration and deceleration lane from the easterly most boundary to "I" Street. This condition shall be subject to right-of-way availability adjacent to the Southern Pacific Rail Road (S.P.R.R.1 tracks; 2. Re-stripe Inland Center Drive between Scenic Drive and "I" Street to provide a two-way left-turn lane and one through lane in each direction to match the existing lane configuration west of "I" Street and east of Scenic Drive; 3. Install "No Parking Any Time" signs on the north side of Inland Center Drive from "I" Street to the easterly most project boundary; and, 4. contribute $20,000 "fair share" amount toward a future signal at Inland Center Drive and "I" Street. ~ M - - o o Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07 June 20, 1991 C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES e. Normal vehicular ingress/egress to the project site across the Southern Pacific Transportation Company rail spur from Inland Center drive may conflict with rail traffic using the spur. Prior to project approval, the applicant must obtain encroachment permits from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company or show proof of any existing access easement(s). Access to the site across the rail spur will be subject to any requirements or conditions specified by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company in granting an encroachment permit or property easement. - o o TRAFFIC IMPACI' STUDY AUTO SERVICE CENTER PROJECI' SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA APRIL,1991 Prepared for: NICK TA V AGLlONE CONSTRUCTION 3S4S Central A venue, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92506 ~ Prepared by: J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Municipal Engineerina Division 290 North "D" Street San Bcnwdino, CA 92401 (714) 383-0370 4 W.O. #9112418 REPORTS:AM9 G 0 ~ - .... - ~ ~-at::l ;g ;c:::""", ~~.t.4 w .......... o ~...z E...... ~ ~.,$5: :iC ~ ;,:..0:".'2:' N :~~,> . =-' ;; N 52 w ... 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 o o t:'- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUC'IlON................................................................................. 1 1 1 5 5 . '1' i -;; '" ~ t 'i- ~ ..:-i ~ 7 9 9 10 10 15 16 17 17 17 18 STIJDY ldE1HOOOLOGY.................................................................. EXISTING CONDmONS.................................................................... 3.1 Existing Traffic V olumcs................................................................ 3.2 InlC1'SCCtion Analysis....................................................................... BACKGROtJND 1RAF'F'Ic................................................................... 4.1 DescIiption...................................................................................... 4.2 InlC1'SCCtion Analysis....................................................................... 5.0 PROJECT IMPACTS............................................................................ 5.1 PIoject Trip Gencration..........:........................................................ 5.2 PIoject Traffic Disuibution............................................................. 5.3 Intersection Analysis....................................................................... 6.0 SITE ACCESS AND CRCULATION...........;..................................... 7.0 8.0 9.0 6.1 Impacts on School Pedestrian Access............................................. 6.2 Driveway Crossing of Railroad Spur.............................................. TRAFFIC SIGN~............................................................................. CONQ..USIONS.................................................................................... RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................... APPENDICES - - o 0 TABLE OF FIGURES Page or', FJ;GURE 1 - VICINITY MAP........................................................................... FIGURE 2 . SI'I"E MAP..................................................................................... FIGURE 3 . EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUldES............................................... FIGURE 4 - BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUldES..................................... FIGURE 5 - PROJECT DISTRIBUTION......................................................... FIGURE 6 - PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUl\ES................................................ FIGURE 7 - EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUldES.................. FIGURE 8 - TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUldES.................................................... LIST OF TABLES Page TABLE 1 - EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND I..EVEl.S OF SER.'VICE................................................................... 5 TABLE 2 . BACKGROUND TRAFFIC INTERSECTION CAPACITY U1ILIZATION AND LEVEl.S OF SERVICE......................................... 7 TABLE 3 - TRIP GENERATION TABULATION.......................................... 10 TABLE 4 - EXISTING PLUS PROJECT VOLUMES CAPACITY U1ILIZA TION AND LEVEl.S OF SERVICE......................................... 15 TABLE 5 . EXISTING PLUS BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT . CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND LEVEl.S OF SERVICE.................... 15 o o LO INTRODUCI'ION This traffic study was conducted in order to determine the impacts of a proposed retaillcoIJUDerCial development in the City of San Bernardino. The site is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Inland Center Drive and South "I" Street. Figure I shows the general vicinity of the project site. The proposed development will provide a total of'appronmlltely 19,500 gross square feet (OSF) of commercial area. The site is proposed to contain a convenience market with gasoline pumps. a car wash and auto related retail space. The site map is included as Figure 2. On-site parking will be provided to meet City code requirements with access from Inland Center Drive and from South "I" Sttcet. The site is currcndy undeveloped. Site development will be to City standards. The site plan is currently under review by City staff including a number of site adjustments and modifications which have been proposed by City staff. 2.0 METHODOLOGY t 'Il Discussions with the City Traffic Engineering staff resulted in the required scope of the study. The primary concerns expressed by the City staff related to impact on the adjacent intcrscction; site access and circulation; impacts on safety of school pedestrian routes and the rail spur crossing. The City has also required that a traffic signal wmant study be completed for the adjacent study intersection. '" Manual turning movement and directional machine counts were conducted by the consultant in onIcr to quantify the existing conditions. The directional mll"h;ne counts were utilized for the traffic signal warrant study. Traffic signal warrants are those which have been established by the State of California (Caltrans). The intersection capacity at the intersection of Inland Center Drive and South "I" Street was evaluated utilizing 1985 Highway Capacity Manual methodology. The capacity evaluation was conducted for existing, existing plus project. background and background plus project traffic conditions. 3.0 EXISTING CONDmONS The existing conditions around the project sites have been identified in onIcr to provide a conditions base and a point of reference for analysis of the impact of the development. The existing conditions include the current peak hour and 24-hour traffic volumes at the intcrscction of In1and Center Drive and South "I" SttccL The existing conditions also include the existing roadway geometrics and traffic controls for the adjacent public streets. I L - .. o 0 ~ ~ ~ 13 z :J: 0:: 0: t:) 0 ~ 0- s: VI 0 ~ i2 ~ :z: ~ 00:: ~ W Z ::::; ~ 0:: (.) W .... z 0 - ~ en 0 (.) 0 O~ 0:: 0 - ~ ~ ,zO ~ O~rs S5 ~ z . . ~ ::::l (.) 0 :J: (.) ~O 0 - . I/lIr '10 '!f)f z- 2 o VI 00 S S 0:: o m~ 0::...1 fi~o o << w ~o 93 ~~ ~o:: ot:)~ 00 ~ z A. ~ _::I w> cr:!:: :::>>~ Cl'U i!> , !! i-t o 1- :t~IL . i 1- " I.' . '., 'f ; t", I "I' ;fll 1\. . ' I ,.... I In, i!-'J '{ ~.1 i , .. J : .! ~ I.,i: 'f', 1 "',', I..., '1-: ; .' . , ., If OJ ; Ij" , I.oj, /'" , r.i'I' ("~ n. , '. I , I ~ I I' . ~..' I. , ~'\ . , I , I " ' , , , , Z NC 111..1 a: a. ::Ie! <:1_ ii:co ~= ~w. ~IIIII - , 0 O. Inland Center Drive within the project area is a 40':!: to SO':!: wide fom-lane roadway which runs from southwest to northeast. InJalltj Center Drive begins in the City of San Bernardino at the intersection of Inland Center Drive, South "E" Street and Mill Street and extends southwesterly past the project site into the City of Colton. At the Colton city limits, the roadway becomes Colton Avenue which terminates at 10th Street in the City of Colton. A Southern Pacific Transportation Company railroad spur parallels the roadway along the northwest side from Mill Street southwesterly past the project site. Inland Center Drive aCcesses the 1-215 freeway immediately to the east of the site with full access ramps provided for north and southbound freeway traffic. The only marked pedeStrian crossing in the project area is at the South "I" Street intersection adjacent to the site. The sigT'IIU7.ed intersection at the southbound 1-215 ramp does not provide for any pedestrian crossings of Inland Center Drive. South "I" Street is a SO':!: wide north-south roadway which provides two lanes oftrave1 in each direction in the project area and terminates at Inland Center Drive. "I" Street continues north from Inland Center Drive to a short distance north of Third Street. At that point the roadway forms the southbound off-ramp from the 1-215 Freeway. The roadway is discontinuous at that point until it picks up again at 13th Street. From that point north, "I" Street consists of fairly short segments which are broken up by major roadways and other freeway crossings. The intersection of South "I" Street and Tn111M Center Drive is controlled by Stop signs with South ''I'' Street stopping for In1and Center Drive. ! Hillcrest A venue is a 20':!: wide, two-lane, local collector roadway which extends westerlj from the intersection of Inland Center Drive at South "I" Street to "K" Street. Hillcrest Avenue is parallel and immediately adjacent to the railroad spur and separated from Inland Center Drive by the railroad right-of-way. Hillcrest Avenue acts as a collector to provide access to Inland Center Drive for the residential area to the north. The roadway is Stop- controlled at its intersection with South "I" Street. Its proximity to the Inland Center Drive/South "I" Street intersection effectively makes it a part of that intersection. Scenic Drive is a local roadway which extends from Inland Center Drive opposite the project site southward to serve a small residential area west of the freeway. The roadway provides for two lanes and parking on both sides with no pavement markings or centerline. No pedeStrian crossings are marked across Inland ~nter Drive. Scenic Drive is Stop-controlled at Inland Center Drive. ~ 1.115 Freeway provides regional north-south access to the site area. The 1-215 Freeway extends from its intersection with the 1-15 Freeway north of San BemaIdino to its intersection with the 1-15 Freeway in the Temecula area to the south. It also connects with the SR-30 Freeway (Crosstown Freeway) to provide access to northeast San Bernardino and the mountain resort areas to the north. The intersections of the freeway ramps with Inland Center Drive are controlled by fully actuated traffic signals with left-turD phasing and indications for left-turDS onto the freeway. ! . ~ 4 4- - o 3.1 Existing Traffic Volumes o Manual turning movement and twenty-four hour machine counts were conducted by the consultant at the study interSeCtions. The manual tlm1ing movement counts were conducted during the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The twenty-four hour machine counts were taken to provide data for the traffic signal warrant study. Figure 3 shows the existing traffic volumes at the adjacent study interSeCtion. Copies of the traffic count snmmary sheets are included in the Appendix for reference purposes. 3.2 Intersection Analysis The study intersections were evaluated under existing conditions using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology. Copies of the computer print-outs for the capacity calculations are included in the Appendix. The existing Levels of Service will serve as the base of comparison between existing and future (project) conditions. Further information on the HCM methodology is provided in Appendix A for those not fAmmar with the process. The results of the evaluation are shown in Table 1. TAJIU I EDSTING TRAFFIC VOWIIES INTERSECTION CA/'AClTf U1'll.lZATlON AND UIVEU OF SBRVlCB I t .; " :e A.M. r/lAX BOUll r.Jl.r/lAX BOUR INTERSECTION DBLAf LD.s. DBLAf L.t1.s. 11IIMdc.."DriNO s..-rSlrul_ HiIJt:ralA_. 3.6 A 4A A As shown in Table I, the intersection is operating at acceptable levels of service under existing traffic conditions. 4.0 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 4.1 Description The background traffic results from the inclusion of one area related project and the addition of a 5CJ& growth factor to the existing traffic volumes. The related project was specified by City staff and consists of a 58 unit single family project south of lnl.Jld Center Drive. The 5 , . ~ o o : : SITE j t .. .. H\\.\.CRESi ~ "ENUE 1- .... '1~ J'~~ JFD LEGEND AM~EAK PM~ FIGURE 3 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6 o o project is expected to be accessed by existing Scenic Drive and a proposed additional access to Inland Center Drive located to the west of South "I" Street. That access is currently identified as "A" Street. Anticipated related project traffic volumes are based on data provided as part of the traffic study which was completed for that projcct. The background traffic projects the volumes expected to be on the roadway system by the evaluation year 1993 without the addition of the project traffic. The growth factor accounts for typical area growth within the project area. Large single developments within the general area of the project would normally be considered separately from the area growth. Figure 4 shows the background traffic volumes at the study interscction which would result from the addition of the related project ttaffic and the 5% growth factor applied to the existing traffic volumes. 4.2 Intersection Analysis The study intersection was evaluated under background traffic conditions by the 1985 HCM method. Table 2 shows the results of the intersection capacity evaluations. ! . TABU: 2 IlAQGROUND TRAFFIC VOUlllllS INI'BIlSECT10N cqAcrn UI7LlZAJ1ON AND lZVIlLS OF SERVICE A.M. PEAJ: BOUR P.JI.PEAJ: BOUR INTBllSECTION DJU.ly l.D.s. DELAY l.D..$. loIII1td eet" Drive II Sat. "[" SIrulIJlld HilJaaI A_ 3.8 A 40J A As shown in the table, with the application of the growth factor to the existing ttaffic volumes, the intersection continues to operate at acceptable levels of service (Level of Service D or better). 7 .~ o o : : SITE t . .' .. H\LLCRESi ,\ \'EtlUE ..,~ ~~~ N 'Ii JfD LEGEND AM ~EAK PM~ FIGURE .. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8 o o 5.0 PROJECT IMPACTS 5.1 Project Trip Generation Traffic for this proposed development was generated using Trip GeMrtzlion, Third Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and a special trip generation study which was reported in the ITE Journal, which is also published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip GenmItion is the compilation of extenSive studies conducted and tabulated by the Institute indicating the the trip generating characteristics for specific types of land uses, including those proposed on the stUdy site. The factors upl;7ed for convenience markets in Trip GeMrtzlion were based on a limited number of studies and did not include any consideration of the inclusion of gasoline pump service. The special study referred to above ITE Joumtzlwas featured in the January, 1991,issue. The same subject was also treated in the July, 1987, issue. However, that Study did not seem as applicable nor did it contain nearly as many study sites (five versus eighteen). Also, missing in that study was any established rdationship between trip rates and number of gasoline pumps. That same small number of studies (also five versus eighteen) is one of the reasons for substituting the Joumtll data for that found in Trip GeMration, 4th. Edition which is also published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Nor does Trip'!; GeMrtllion provide any data to relate trips to number of gas pumps. Their data is strictly: based on square footage of floor area. A review of previous studies and a comparison with: the cited work indicates that the data utilized was more pertinent to our area and the type of project proposed. The articles have been excerpted and are included in the Appendix for reference purposes. The procedure and data was reviewed with City staff prior to uril;7J1rion in onier to assure that the methodology was acceptable. Some trip generation studies have also included surveys addressing pass-by traffic and in1mlaltraffic. Studies conducted for pass-by traffic have suggested that a percentage of the traffic generated by a proposed project will originate from the existing flow, therefore, the project does not necessarily introduce all new traffic to the road netwolk. Pass-by traffic varies relative to the specific land.uses -Under consideration. Some studies have also varied; however, the ITE publication Trausportation and Land Development, by Virgil G. Stover and Frank J. Koepke. has combined these studies to suggest uniform rates. These rates range from 8% for hardware stores to 6()CJ, for shopping centers with gross lease area less than 100,000 square feet. Service station and fast food restaurants also exhibit high pass-by rates of S8% and 45%, respectively. The July, 1987 JOUT1IIJl reference indicates that a pass-by rate of over 6()CJ, was found while Trip Generation indicates that a 4S% pass-by rate was found in the limited number of sites (four) tested for pass-by rates. With the preceding in mind, a conservative figure of 25% pass-by traffic was utilized for this stUdy. Table 3 shows the trip genetation tabulation for the project site. 9 - o o TAlIU 3 TRIP GENUATION TABVLA770N UIwnu AM Pod; B_ PM Pod; B_ ~V.. Slr.r V_ I. Old I. Old C.......... MItz. 4100 GSF 3"0 146 146 lS3 lS3 wilIt,.._wlI6___ Ctlr W... SIIJJlI> 540 IS IS 12 12 AlllD RIUJud 19S3 36 IS IDS 109 RIlIIU S.,.,., 6303 In 17f 210 274 R_ft>r P-.byTripr (ZO'I>) lS76 49 44 68 69 1'''''' m7 148 132 zoz %OS 5.2 Project Traffic Distribution i Figure 5 presents the trip distribution based on existing traffic patterns, street networf, systems, relationship to freeway access, land-use types and anticipated traffic demand patterns for the proposed prOjecL The percentages shown reflect the primary desire lines anticipated for the projecL The actual individual traffic assignments will vary somewhat depending on driveway locations and ease of access to the desired direction of travel. The proposed distribution of project traffic was reviewed with City staff prior to plocccding with the actual calculations. The project traffic volumes were distributed to the street system according to the project disuibution patternS. Figure 6 shows the project volumes distributed to the adjacent roadway system. Figure 7 shows the existing plus project volumes on the adjacent street network. Figure 8 shows those same project volumes added to the background (existing plus growth) traffic. 5.3 Intersection Analysis .. The intersections were then evaluated under background plus project traffic conditions. Table 4 shows the results of the addition of the project traffic to the existing traffic volumes. Table 5 shows the results of the addition of the project traffic to the background traffic conditions. 10 - .4 .. - o o : : ~ o .. SITE t r\\LLCRES1 /t.VEtlUE /~'f ~ ~ J'~~ NOT TO SCALE JFD LEGEND xxx ('NY) EHl'ERING EX/TlNG FIGURE & PROJECT DISTRIBUTION 1 1 - _ l$I _ 1 z El a CII o o ~ . . H\\..\..CRESl ~VENUE -f~ ~<'~ NOT TO SCALE JFD LEGEND ~~ PM~ FIGURE 8 PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 12 , . z ~ d HILLCRESi J\:v El'l U E o o : : SITE ..' -1~ . ~<' ~ NOT TO SCALE JFD LEGEND xxx (YYY) ~ PEAK PM PEAK FIGURE 7 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 13 z 51 o o ~ : : ~; SITE i! ::- t\\LLCRESl ~VENUE ..,~ V'<- ~ jiB LEGEND AN ~EAI( P"~ FIGURE 8 TOT AL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 14 o o TAJJUU EXISTING PWS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOWMES INTERSEC7'10N CAPACITI' UTIUZATION AND U!VELS OF SERVICE A.M. PEA/{ HOUR P./II.PEA/{ HOUR INTERSECTION DElAY L.O,s, DElAY L.O,s. lriIIIIIlc.-Driw4P s.. 'T' S,,", iIII/J H_A_ 3.4 A 4.2 A TABU S EXISTING PWS BAaGROVNI} PWS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOWMES IN'l'ERSEC7'10N CAPACITI' UTIL1ZATION AND U!VELS OF SERVICE A.M. PEA/{ HOUR P./II.P~ HOUR ;! ; INTERSEC7'ION DElAY L.O,s, DBl.tY L.O,s. lri11111lc.-Driw@ s.. .r SIrNI iIII/J H_A_ 3.7 A 4.2 A With the addition of the project traffic to existing and background traffic the intersection is projected to continue at acceptable (Level of Service D or better) levels of service. 6.0 SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION Site access is provided by standard commercial driveway approaches from Inland Center Drive and South "I" Street. The Inland Center Drive access requires the crossing of the Southern Pacific spur line. Encroachment Permits will be required from Southern Pacific Transportation Company to allow that crossing. The specific access location is a result of negotiations with City staff in order to provide the best location. The access proposed will line up with the centerline of existing Scenic Drive on the south side of Inland Center Drive. The driveway therefore becomes a part of a standard intersection and is more easily controlled. - 15 o o The access from South "I" Street has been reviewed by City staff and that review has resulted in some adjustments to the initial site plans. Those adjustments have resulted in the relocation of the driveway northward to provide a more acceptable separation distance between the driveway and the intersection. The revision also takes into account any anticipated queuing of entering vehicles. That queuing consideration is important in order to m;n;m;7l'! conflicts between entry queues and on-street traffic flows. Parking is provided on-site to meet the code requirements of the City of San Bernardino. The on-site parking in the vicinity of the Inland Center Drive access (opposite Scenic Drive) has been revised somewhat from the initial proposed site layout to allow for reduced conflict between entering traffic" and parking maneuvers. 6.1 Impacts on School Pedestrian Access The impact of the proposed site development on school pedestrian routes has been reviewed as a part of this study. As a part of that review, the Urbita p.1ementary School was contacted to determine the area of influence of the school which is located to the north on "1" Street between Grant A venue and Hazel Avenue. The students passing the site would primarily ~ those living in the subdivision served by Scenic Drive. A yellow school pedestrian crossw~ is located at the intersection of Inland Center Drive and South "I" Street The crosswalk location would indicate that the intended crossing location for students living on the south side of Inland Center Drive is across the west leg of the Inland Center DrivelSouth "I" Street intersection. However, the school principal indicates that no "safer route to school" route has been identified. Therefore, it must be assumed that at least some of the students may cross at the Scenic Drive intersection and thus traverse along the project frontage or across the site. The only other school in the ;mmediate area is located west of the site in the City of Colton. Since that school is located in a different jurisdiction and does not generate school traffic in the site area, it was not considered a part of the concerns of this study. The primaIy site impacts which would affect the school age pedestrian would be those which involve the provision of a safe and visible walking area. The site development has been reviewed to assure that sidewalks along the site frontage will not only provide for pedestrians, but would do so safely. School pedestrian safety would include provisions for adequate visibility at driveway intersections with the public streets. Particular attention will be directed toWard those landscape and structmal features which would conceal a small child from the driver's view. The same review of site features should extend into the site proper since some children may choose to cut through the site. Additionally, the site developer and subsequent management should work with the school to discourage site crossings as much as possible due to the potential hazards of small children crossing an auto oriented site. 16 - - .b.. o 6.2 Driveway Crossing of Railroad Spur The developer will be required to obtain an encroachment permit from the Southern Pacific Transponation Company to allow the construction of the Inland Center Drive access across. the railroad right-of-way. The crossing would be similar to that utilized to serve the Levitz Furniture site on Inland Center Drive to the northeast of the freeway. The primary concern will probably be the obtaining of the necessary permits since the frequency of train trips on this spur is very low and sbould not create a particular hazard. The one design feature of the railroad crossing which should be included is the assurance of good visibility in both directions along the railroad right-of-way: Appropriate signing of the crossing will be required in order to advise that the spur is active and caution is required. The signing and pavement marking plan will be subject to the requirements of both the City of San Bernardino and Southern Pacific Transportation Company. City staff has indicated that there has been some discussion of the abandonment of the spur. In that case, the safety requirements stated above would no longer be a concern. (:) 7.0 TRAFFlC SIGNALS The intersection of Inland Center Drive and South "I" Street has been evaluated for satisfaction of standard traffic signal wmants. The wmants utilized an: those established bi Caltrans and accepted by the City of San Bernardino. Under both the existing and projected background traffic conditions, both the Minimum Vehicular Volume Warrant and the Interruption of Traffic Warrant arc already met. The addition of proposed project traffic volumes is cxpcctcd to increase the justification for traffic signals at the intersection. The traffic signal warrant worksheets arc included in the Appendix. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS The development of the proposed project will result in a cumulative impact on the adjacent street network. However, the cumulative traffic impacts at the study intersection result in acceptable levels of service (Level of Service D, or better). In fact, the traffic projections result in projected levels of service JP.fI'lA;n;'lg at "A". Typical off-site improvements for the project will be required as a part of the plot approval process. Those improvements should include curb, gutter and sidewalk modifications and improvements to meet the site requirements. The primary Inland Center Drive access sbould be full COlDwC1Gdl width with its centerline aligned with the centerline of Scenic Drive. 17 - - o 0 The Inland Center Drive driveways will cross the Southern Pacific Transponation Company tracks and right-of-way. An encroachJ;Dent permit will be required from the railroad. Standard crossing signs will be required in order to advise of the crossing and the need to not stop on the tracks. The Inland Center Drive frontage of the site will need to have design . restrictions to avoid sight obstructions along the railroad spur in both directions. Traffic signal warrants are met under existing conditions without the addition of project traffic and therefore should already be under consideration for the installation of traffic signals. The addition of background traffic volumes and project volumes adds to the satisfaction of wmants rather than creating that condition. 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following improvements are recommended as a result of this study: o The principal Inland Center Drive access should be a commercial driveway with its centerline aligned with the centerline of Scenic Drive. o If the railroad right-of-way allows for sufficient right-of-way width along Inland Center Drive, the off-site improvements should include a westbound right-turri' lane to serve the westbound traffic entering the driveway from Inland Center: Drive. o In1and Center Drive will be re-striped to provide a through lane in each direction to match the number of through lanes existing from the South "I" Street intersection, west. A two-way left-turn lane will be provided between South "I" Street and approximately Scenic Drive. Design details and striping plan requirements will be determined in discussions with City staff. If railroad right- of-way allows for sufficient width, a westbound right-turn lane will be provided at the "I" Street intersection. o Sidewalks shall be provided along both frontages of the site and shall show specific consideration for school pedestrian safety. Such considerations shall include specific attention to vehicu1ar/pedcstrian visibility at all driveways. o A joint effort between the developer and Urbita F.leme'ltary School to discourage use of the site as a school access route due to the auto oriented nature of the development ~ o An encroachment permit will be required from the Southern Pacific Transponation company for the proposed Inland Center Drive access. Driveway design, signing and marking will meet the requirements of the railroad company in addition to any required by the City on Inland Center Drive. 18 o 0 o It is expected that the City will require contribution by the developer towards the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Inland Center Drive and South "I" Street. The percentage of participation should be negotiated between the developer and the City. ~ ~ . . 19 o , , 1- 4a:. .b. o ~ APPENDIX . o o APPENDIX A INTERSECTION CAPACITY EVALUATION INFORMATION AND COMPUI'ER PRINT-OUTS .~ J. J.L. ~ ~ - o () ***********************************"'*****"'************"'**"''''*** ... ... '" PROJECT NAME: NICK TAVAGLIONE CONSTRUCTION +. * * '" JOB NUMBER: 9112412 ... '" ... +. ANALYST: RJL ... ... * * DATE: APRIL, 1991 ... +. * ************************************************************** +-------------------------------------------------------------------* YEAR OF COUNTS: 1991 PROJECTED YEAR: 1993 ANNUAL GROWTH RATE: 5.00% COMPOUNDED GROWTH: 10.3% BACKGROUND PROJECTION AND TRIP GENERATION DATA *-------------------------------------------------------------------* LAND USE 1 TRIPS RELATED' PROJ. 58 D.U. RELATED PROJ. TRIPS 2 RELATED PF:OJ. TRIPS 3 AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM ENTER: EXIT: 197 176 270 274 21 37 -- ';;'1 o o o l1! lZl l1! l1! o 21 0% 0% 0% INTERNAL: PASSBY: 0"1- 25% 0% 0% "'., "".. , \. \.'. *-------------------------------------------------------------------* -, o o GENERATED TRAFFIC ADJUSTMENTS ----------------------------- *-------------------------------------------------------------------* LAND USE 1 RELATED "'F:OJ. RELATED PF:OJ. RELATED F'F:OJ.: TRIPS TRIPS 1 TRIPS 2 TRIPS ~ AM PM AM PM AM PM AM F-M ENTER: 148 2~3 21 37 0 121 121 121 EXIT: 132 21216 37 21 0 121 121 121 +-------------------------------------------------------------------* TOTAL TRAFFIC MINUS PASS-BY & INTERNAL TRIPS *-------------------------------------------------------------------* LAND USE 1 RELATED PROJ. RELATED PROJ. RELATED PROJ. : TRIPS TRIPS 1 TRIPS 2 TRIPS 3 ! AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM ENTER: EXIT: 121 121 o o o 121 121 121 121 121 121 o 121 iZJ 121 121 *-------------------------------------------------------------------* I NTEF:NAL TR I PS +-------------------------------------------------------------------* LAND USE 1 RELATED PROJ. RELATED PROJ. RELATED PROJ. : TRIPS TRIPS 1 TRIPS 2 TRIPS 3 AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM ENTER: EXIT: 49 44 68 69 121 121 121 l2l 121 121 121 11I 121 11I 121 121 *-------------~-----------------------------------------------------* PASS-BY TRIPS - - .Jlh . ~ --------------------------------------~--------------------I I-----------------~----------------------------------------- .. .. : INTERSECTION: INLAND CENTER DRIVE ~ S H 'I' STREET : : EIIST .+PROJ. BACK&R. +PRO~. 1---------------------------------------------------------------1 All P" All P" A H LAND USE 1 RElATED PRO~. RElATED PROJ. RElATED PROJ. I---------------------------------------------------~- P 0 DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTIDN : PERCENT PROJECT IMPACT: 8.81 8.91 7.BI 7.9% P V : PERCENT PROJECT INCREASE: 9.7% 9.81 B.n B.6I R E E E E E 1--------------------------------------------------------_. D M N E . E N E N E EXlsTlNS PRDJECT BACKSRDUND TDTAL A E T I T I T I T I TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC C N E I E I E I E I H T R T R T R T R T AH PH AH Pn All PH All PH N8 L II II II II II n ex 81 I I , I I I I I T II 81 II 81 II aI B% II I e I . I I I I R II II II II II II It 8% I I I I I I I I 5B L II 181 II 81 II 81 II II 73 186 13 21 81 117 94 m T II II 81 II II II II II I I I I I I I I R II 51 II II n II II n 21 51 7 II 22 55 29 65 EB L 51 II II II II 81 II n 25 41 . II 2B 45 35 55 I T In II 51 51% II 8% II II 222 271 15 21 265 311 279 331 R II 81 81 II II 1% II II I I I . I I I I MB L II II II n II n II II I I I I I . or I I T n 181 51% 5% II n II n 211 342 13 21 233 397 ? 246 418 ,. R III II II II II II II II 182 237 15 21 211 261 " 215 282 SUH 251 251 56I 561 II 1% II II 722 1146 71 182 B28 1186 . 898 12B9 1----------------------- ----------1 1------------------ --------. : INTERSECTION: INLAND CENTER DRIVE ~ 'A' STREET EIIST . +PRDJ. BACK6R. +PROJ . .---------------------- -------------------1 --All PH All PN A N LAND USE 1 RElATED PROJ. RELATED PROJ. RElATED PROJ. .------------------------------------------------------------1 P 0 DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRI8UTlON DISTRiBUTION : PERCENT PROJECT IHPACT: 5.9% 7.31 5.11 6.31 P V : PERCENT PRO~ECT INCREASE: 6.3% 7.8% 5.41 6.7% R E E E E E 1-----------------------------------------------. D N N E N E N E N E ElIST1NS PROJECT 8ACK6RDUND TOTAL A E T I T I T I T I TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC C N E I E I E I E I H T R T R T R T R T AN - . PN AH PH All PH AN PN .--'> ~B L II 81 II 341 II n II n . I I I 13 7 13 i T II II n II II II II II I I I I I I I I R II II II 51% II II II II I . I I 19 11 19 11 ~ 58 L II II II II II II II II I . I I I I I . T II II II II II II II II I . I I . . . I R II II n II II II II II I I I I I I I . E8 L II II . II II II II II II I I I I I e I I T 151 II II II II II II II 245 22. 22 3. 271 243 292 273 R II II m II II II II II I I I I 7 13 7 13 HB L II II 51% II II II II II I I I I 11 19 11 19 T II 151 II II II II II II 421 561 21 31 463 619 483 649 R n II II II II n II II I I I . I I I I SUN 151 151 est 851 II II II II 665 781 42 61 782 911 824 m - HCM: SIGNALIZED INt;LSECTION SUMMARV <:) J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES. INC. ====__==_==_c=s_====___=__-=________________c===s____===_==-=-----===-= Streets: (E-W) INLAND CENTER DRIVE Analyst: RJL Area Type. Other Comment: EXISTING CONDITIONS (N-S) SOUTH I STREET File Name: INLIEAM.SIG 4-17-91 AM PEAK ===_==_=____===-====_==__==-__===-==__===-c__=====-==_==========--=---= Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound : L T R Southbound : L T R ---- --:---- --1---- No. Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols > 1 25 222 12.0 2 < 200 182: 12.0 : 1 1 20 12.0 o 73 :12.0 o 0l -------------------------- Si gnal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left * N8 Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds W8 Left * S8 Left * Thru * Thru Right * Right * Peds * Peds * N8 Right E8 Right S8 Right .we Right * Gr_n 40A lGreen 10A Vellow/A-R 5 lVellcw/A-R 5 Lost Time 3.0 :Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 60 sees Phase combination order: 4U- .5 7 8 1 . ----------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat vIe g/e Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- ---- --- --- -- -- EB LT 1711 1198 0.27 0.70 2.2 A 2.2 A W8 TR 3276 2293 0.21 0.70 2.1 A 2.1 A S8 L 1472 294 0.28 0.20 15.6 C 15.0 8 R 1472 294 0.07 0.20 12.6 8 Intersection Delay - 3.6 (see/veh) Intersection LOS '" A -------------------------------------------------------- HCM: SIGNALIZED IN~SECTION SUMMARY <:> J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ___ __===_=====s==========-===----=====----=---====-~--==s============ Streets: (E-W) INLAND CENTER DRIVE Analyst: RJL Area Type: Other Comment: EXISTING CONDITIONS (N-S) SOUTH I STREET File Name: INLIEPM.SIG 4-17-91 PM PEAK --=-------===--===========-=======-==-===--==----==-=---==-=--=-------= Eastbound Westbound Northbound: Southbound L T R: L T R: L T R I L T R --- ---- ----1--- --- --1-- --~-- No. Lan_ > 1 2 < . 1 . Volumes 41 270 342 2371 , 111I6 , Lane Width 12.0 12.0 :12.0 RTOR Vols 01 11I1 1 :50 12.0 o -------------------- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left * INB Left Thru * . Thru , Right * . Right , Peds * . Peds . WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right * Gr_n 3BA Green 12A Yellow/A-R 5 Yellow/A-R :5 Lost Time 3.0 Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 60 secs Phase combinatlon order: 4U 4t5 7 8 t ~ t. . ~ ---------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat vlc glc Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- ----- --- -- --- --- EB LT 1612 107:5 11I.34 11I.67 2.9 A 2.9. A WB TR 3319 2213 0.2B 0.67 2.7 A 2.7 A SB L 1472 343 0.3:5 0.23 14.9 B 13.9 B R 1472 343 0.17 0.23 11.9 B Intersection Delay = 4.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A --------------------------------------------------- . SI8NALIZED IN~RSECTION SUMMARY <:> J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. HCM: ==__==_c.a_=_=-=_===-==---==----=-=-=--~=----===-===--=--=-=---==s--8C= Streets: (E-W) INLAND CENTER DRIVE Analyst: RJL Area Type: Other Comment: EXISTIN8 + PROJECT CONDITIONS (N-S) SOUTH I STREET File Name: INLIEPAM.SI8 4-17-91 AM PEAK =====_===__s=~=_=_-=_=________=_-=-=_========_=_====_=__====_====~ Eastbound : L T R Westbound L T R Northbound : L T R Southbound : L T R 1-- ---1--- --1--- No. Lanes Volu_s Lane Width RTOR Vols : 1 1 32 237 :12.0 12.0 1 213 12.0 1 197: 12.0: 01 : 1 86 :12.0 1 27 12. III o 1/1 --------- ----- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru Right * Right * i Peds * Peds * NB Right IEB Right SB Right :WB Right * 8reen 38A tBreen 12A Yellow/A-R 5 IYellow/A-R 5 Lost Time 3.1/1 :Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 61/1 secs Phase combination order: *1 *5 7 8 ------------------------------------------ Intersection Performance Summary Lane 8roup: Adj Sat vlc glc Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ---- ----- -- --- -- EB L 865 577 1/1.07 0.67 2.7 A 2.6 A T 1782 1188 1/1.26 Ill. 67 2.6 A we T 1782 118B 0.23 0.67 2.6 A 1.4 A R 14B3 1335 0.19 0.9lZl lZl.2 A SB L 1472 343 lZl.2B lZl.23 14.5 B 13.B e R 1472 343 lZl.lZl9 lZl.23 11.6 e Intersection Delay = 3.4 (sec/v.h) Intersection LOS = A --------------------------------------------------- HCM: SIGNALIZED IN~SECTION SUMMARY <:> J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~=s===_=~_==_===========____s==__====s==----===-~===-=-==_==____===a=== (N-S) SOUTH I STREET File Name: INLIEPPM.SIG 4-17-91 PM PEAK Streets: (E-W) INLAND CENTER DRIVE Analyst: RJL Area Types Other Comment: EXISTING + PROJECT CONDITIONS =====__=__.c=-========_==_S=_==-=======--===--========================= Eastbound Westbound Northbound: Southbound L T R: L T R I L T R: L T R ---1---- ---1---- ---1---- No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 . . 1 . . Volum.s 51 290 363 257: . 127 . Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0: :12.0 RTOR Vols 0: 01 1 61ll 12. III III -------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right .WB Right * Green 37A I Green 13A Yello",/A-R 5 :Yello",/A-R 5 Lost Time 3.0 lLost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 60 sees Phase combination order: #1 #5 7 8 " -------------------------------------------------------- I nters.ct 1 on Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat vie glc Approach: Mvmts Cap Flo", Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- EB L 680 442 0.14 0.65 3.1 A 3.0 A T 1782 1158 0.29 0.65 3.0 A WB T 1782 1158 0.34 0.65 3.1 A 1.9 A R 1484 1336 0.21 0.90 0.2 A SB L 1472 368 0.39 0.25 14.6 B 13.6 B R 1472 368 0.18 0.25 11.5 B Intersection Delay .. 4.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS .. A -------------------------------------------------------------- - HCI'I: SIGNALIZED IN~SECTION SUMMARY <:) J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. _--=a_____====___=_==_______~---===-----------.-=---==----------==----- Streets: (E-W) INLAND CENTER DRIVE Analyst: RolL Area Type: Other Comment: 8ACKGROUND CONDITIONS (1993) (N-S) SOUTH I STREET File Name: INLI8AM.SIG 4-17-91 AM PEAK __==__==___-=______====___==__=======_=====m2____==-=-__=_-=-- ___-==-_ Phase combination 1 E8 Left Thru Right Peds W8 Left Thru Right Peds N8 Right S8 Right Green Yellow/A-R Lost Time Cycle Length: No. Lanes Volu..es Lane Width RTOR Vols Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound I L T R SClUthbound : L T R --- ----1- -- ;--- > 1 28 26:5 12.0 2 < 233 2011 12.0 I 1 1 22 12.0 o 80 112.0 o 01 ------------ * * * * * * * * Signal Operations :2 :5 4 I IN8 Left Thru Right Peds 58 Left * Thru Right * Peds * E8 Right W8 Right * Green llA IYellaw/A-R 5 ILost Time 3.0 Phase combination order: tt1--.5 " ~ 5 6 7 8 39A :5 3.0 60 secs ------------------------------------------------ Intersecti'on Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat vlc g/c Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- --- --- --- --- -- E8 LT 1724 1178 0.28 0.68 2.4 A 2.4 A- W8 TR 3288 2247 0.21 0.68 2.3 A 2.3 A 58 L 1472 319 0.28 _ ~.22 15.0 C 14.4 8 R 1472 319 0.08 - 0.22 12.1 8 Intersection Delay .. 3.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS .. A -------------------------------------------------- HC/'I: SIGNALIZED INQRSECTION SUMMARY 0 J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. _=:s~a_=__=_==___==_=_==-___~==-=_.S_===-==--==--=---==-=-==-__c=___~ (N-S) SOUTH I STREET File Name: INLI8PM.SIG 4-17-91 PM PEAK Streets: (E-W) INLAND CENTER DRIVE Analyst: RJL Area Type: Other Cemment: BACKGROUND CONDITIONS (1993) -======-=-----=---====--=-------==--===========-=-=---===-===---=--- -- ___ ____ ----1---- ---- ----1---- Eastbeund L T R Westbeund I L T R Nerthbeund : L T R Seuthbeund : L T R --: --- Ne. Lanes Velumes Lane Width RTOR Vels > 1 45 310 12.0 2 < 397 261 : 12.0 I 1 1 117 112.0 1 s:5 12. III o 01 0: ------ ----------------- Si gnal Operatiens Phase combinatien 1 2 3 4 , 5 6 , E8 Left * :NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * S8 Left * Thru * Thru Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right E8 Right S8 Right W8 Right * Gr_n 38A Green 12A Yellcw/A-R 5 Yellew/A-R 5 Lest Time 3.0 Lest Time 3.lZl Cycle Length: 60 sees Pha.e cembinatlen erder: 4U *5 7 B ~ ,. , ------------------------------------------------ Inter.ectien Perfermance Summary Lane Greup: Adj Sat vie glc Appreach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratie Ratie Delay LOS Delay LOS ---- --- -- --- -- EB LT 1560 104111 0.38 0.67 3.0 A 3.0 A W8 TR 3325 2217 0.33 Ill. 67 2.8 A 2.8 A S8 L 1472 343 0.38 0.23 15.0 C 14.1lI 8 R 1472 343 Ill. 18 0.23 11.9 B Intersection Delay .. 4.5 (sec/veh) Intersectien LOS ... A ----------------------------------- ..- ------------ - . HCI'I: SIGNALIZED IN~SECTION SUMMARY <:> J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~==_========-z==-===========~==___m==~====-___=_-=__a=_==-======-----=- Streets: (E-W) INLAND CENTER DRIVE Analyst: RJL Area Type: Other Comment: BACKGROUND + PROJECT (N-S) SOUTH I STREET File Name: INLIBPAM.5IG 4-17-91 AM PEAK COND IT IONS =-=_z==-==_=-==s========__==_======_============__==============------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R ----:---- ----:-- --l--- No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 . 1 . Volumes 35 279 246 2151 94 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.01 ; 12.m RTOR Vols 01 01 1 29 12.0 o --------------------------- Si gnal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 EB Le-ft * INB Le-ft Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds we Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru Right * Right * Peds * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right * Green 37A Green 13A Yellow/A-R 5 Yellow/A-R 5 Lost Time 3.0 Last Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 60 sees Phase combinat1co order: 4U-- 4t5 7 8 f < ; . ------------------------------------------------ Lane Group: Mvmts Cap Inter..ction Performance Adj Sat vIe glc Flow Ratio Ratio -- -- 568 0.07 0.65 1158 0.27 0.65 1158 0.24 0.65 1336 0.18 0.90 368 0.28 0.25 368 0.09 0.25 3.7 (sec/veh) Summary Approach: Delay LOS Delay LOS --- ---- 2.9 A 2.9. A 2.9 A 2.8 A 1.6 A 0.2 A 13.9 e 13.3 B 11.1 B Intersection LOS .. A EB L 874 T 1782 WB T 1782 R 1484 SB L 1472 R 1472 Intersection Delay .. ------------------------------------------------------------ . - _ J ~ L Jib HCM: SIGNALIZED IN~SECTION SUMMARY <:> J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. . , =-===-~____s_==______=====_=________=__=____&=&=-_===________====___~= Streets: (E-W) INLAND CENTER DRIVE Analyst: RJL Area Type: Other Comment: BACKGROUND + PROJECT (N-S) SOUTH I STREET File Name: INLIBPPM.SIG 4-17-91 PM PEAK CONDITIONS ==~====--___c____==__-===-====__======_=========__==__=========c_===sc Eastbound I L T R Westbound : L T R Northbound I L T R Southbound I L T R :- ---1--- --- ----1---- ---: --- No. Lanes , 1 1 1 1 . 1 . . Volumes 55 331ll 418 282: . 137 . Lane Width I 12. III 12. III 12. III 12.1ll1 : 12.B RTOR Vols Ill: Ill: 1 65 12. III III ---------------------------- Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 :5 6 EB Left * :NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds * Peds WB Left * :SB Left * Thru * Thru Right * Ri ght . * Pe.js * Peds * NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right * Green 37A Green 13A Yellow/A-R 5 Yellow/A-R :5 Lost Time 3. III Lost Time 3.1ll Cycle Length: 61ll secs Phase combinatIon order: 4U-#:5 7 8 t ------------------------------------------------- EB L T WB T R SB L R Intersection 547 1782 1782 1484 1472 1472 Delay Intersecti'on Performance Summary Adj Sat v/c g/c Approach: Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- -- -- --- ---- 356 Ill. 17 Ill. 65 3.2 A 3.1 A US8 Ill. 32 Ill. 65 3. III A US8 1ll.41ll Ill. 65 3.3 A 2.1 A 1336 Ill. 23 1ll.91ll Ill. 3 A 368 Ill. 41 Ill. 25 14.7 B 13.7 B 368 1ll.21ll Ill. 25 11.5 B . 4.2 (_c/veh) Intersection LOS = A Lane Mvmts Group: Cap -------------------------------------------- - -- c - - - APPENDIX B TRAFFIC COUNT DATA ?~ o .. L Site Code : 0'11Z418 '-1 srlm: I 1f\I'WJ CUrD DIll 0 . I~' srun: IlL crl DI n\.ILLClISr llAno : sum .OJ....tl by: PrilarJ o PAR: I 'ILl: smcu --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--------.-.-------- D&1'I: 3/Zl/ll PI1. PIIIOD lIlUSIS POI rll PIIIOD: I: 00 AI - 9: DO AI DIlICfIOI nAlr '101 PIlI 100 Pili n ........... 'OLDIES II......... ...." PDCaTS ....... PAcrol PIDI lie~t nru Left rot&! PIDS lieU r~n Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lorU lilt SOIU lilt I:U AI I:U AI 1:30 AI I:'D AI 'orU lilt SOIU Wut f:U AI [PEDS] 1 ------------------* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . ------------------ ~ ------------------* [PEDS ] ~ '.12 D.18 '.11 D.U D D Z4 68 92 D 114 18 ZDD m I III Z2 3 zn D D 18 1 19 IDtire IDterlectiol 1 0 ID 58 II D 164 18 100 m I III Z2 3 zn 3 D 15 . 15 D.l9 D.II D.I& D.U I ST ...... , .,. . , I . . . I .,. . , I...... II.... , I........... . I I . . . . . . . . . . . . :.. 186 ... 58 :............ o 20 78 HILLCREST o 15 15 INL CTR DR w15 . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . I .. 220 ...: I . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .. .. ...: . INLAND CENTER DR IB ...: ------------------~----- o 247 3 , 22 I I I , I I I , I 3 222 o Z& 14 U 5 51 .0 t 1 . 15 5 . 2& 14 U 5 51 to I 1 . 1m . N W-+-E S t ~. . !- o [PEDS ] *------------------ 164 ------------------ 382 18 ------------------ 200 . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *------------------ 2 [PEDS ] lit. Cod. : .,11141. I-I ITIIITI I IrIIJWD cam 0111 1-1 srulT: m CTI 01 O\IILLCUST IUrall : CLam o vvual~ U.~!111.u .ef....te b,: Prit&r, JII. o UR: 1 'ILl: lII1eN --.....----------------------------------------------.-----------------------------------------------------------........--------- 11ft: SlU/Il PIlI PIIIOO mLYSU POI TIE PIIIOO: I : 00 PI - 6: 00 P. DIUC!IOI nor !TD! PIlI 100 PUI II PlCTOI ........... YOLDIS ..,........ PIDI lirbt Un L.ft !etal ...... PIICIITI ......t PIDS IirU Un Left --------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------- InU lilt "It. ..It 4:00 PI 5:00 PI 4:15 PI 5:00 P. lofU lilt Io.U ,"t 5:00 PI [PEDS] 2 ------------------* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . .. ":" NL CTR '. 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.68 0.18 0.13 0.85 0.68 IS'!" I I 55 101 158 3 lot II 341 m I 30' 33 3 m 0 10 I 0 11 latir. I.t.n.ctio. I 4 40 IT 141 3 20t II 341 m 3 no 31 , 311 0 10 1 0 11 :- ~,-. ~ .~-l=' ~ ZB ------------------------ HILLCREST I I . . . . . . . . . . . . , I . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . , " , I I . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 4 40 97 141 ... ----------------------- ------------------ ~ ------------------* [PEDS ] 10 o 9 19 , . . . . , ... . , ... . 1 35 64 31 5 51 II It 1 53 n I 3 28 It 31 5 51 IT 11 I 53 n 0 N W-+-E S t .. * i ". " , 3 [PEDS ] *------------------ 209 ------------------ 579 28 . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 392 ...: I . . . . . . . . . . . . I , . . . . . . . . . . . . I I . . . . . . . . . . . . I , . . . I I ... . ...: ------------------~----- o ------------------ 342 ------------------ , , , . ';.:,-,:. :.Es:r INL CTR DR WB , , , ----------------------- 311 7 , 34 , , I , I , , , , : 270 I I I I I I I. I S!.INLAND CENTER DR EB , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 376 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *------------------ 3 [PEDS ] ro'11241. : S" 111I110110 fILl: SIIIICIS mm : I IrI.Olfl Of UWO CUfll JlIIllo 0 uslum.: NORTHBOUND V SOUTHBOUND om: 3/11/11 --....-.------------.-----.-..-------------------------_.._---.._.-----_.__._------------_._------~---.-.-----.----.-----.-...---- rI.1 ------- 1110 ---.... .....~. IIID ...---- ....- COIBIIID ..... DAJ: JIDIIO.J IIllU .. PI .. PI .. PI -------------------.-.-.---.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 1:10 1:15 1:30 1:45 2:11 Z:15 2:31 .. 2:45 3:" 3:15 3:30 3:45 4:'0 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 1:'0 1:15 1:30 1:45 7:0' 7:15 7:31 7:45 ':00 ':15 ':31 ':45 1:10 1:15 1:30 1:41 10:01 10:15 10:30 11:45 11:01 11:15 11:30 11:45 1 4 o o 5 1 o o o 1 2 1 1 o 4 o 1 o 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 3 1 I 11 I 11 I 13 31 11 35 51 10 115 31 31 45 12 m 35 27 31 41 no 27 21 U 35 114 21 21 11 U 113 35 32 31 50 41 31 21 11 21 27 27 41 31 34 42 57 32 35 41 45 53 44 if 81 35 35 27 11 11 17 11 I 11 11 14 U 13 13 7 4 4 4 2 . . 3 1 3 153 111 122 111 153 240 113 u 57 n 11 12 1 4 4 3 2 1 o 4 3 o o 2 o o o o 1 3 o 2 3 2 3 1 3 3 12 I 11 11 11 U 21 11 22 n 25 21 18 U 44 11 34 50 32 40 31 55 /6 12 :2- 7 5 ~ o ,8 ,4- I 4~ 27 !07 Ii lit .. 117 U5 159 141 iii 111 41 31 41 51 112 n 44 30 31 110 34 31 31 41 152 4t 30 30 3f UI U U U 32 111 U 34 34 34 131 U 11 21 21 122 U 34 18 32 125 U 23 21 Sf IU 22 ZO Ii 21 II 14 13 11 3 4t 3 3 1 2 I 2 . 4 3 17 3 1 o 4 . 5 1 1 2 I o 1 o 1 2 2 4 1 3 11 4 5 4 7 20 I 14 21 2Z II 35 U II 113 no 51 51 If lit 311 10 48 15 12 Z55 n 44 70 15 no 11 It If II 2U .1 70 14 100 .. 75 51 if 11 II 5. II 71 14 7Z U m .1 71 n n .. " II IZI 11 53 51 '41 II 51 41 4t 41 31 40 U 35 U 32 Ii 11 17 12 11 . I 2 5 m m m 311, . .. m 235 111 111 125 51 21 ----........-------...---.......---.......----.................................................................................... 'GTill .41 1253 U yoml 1014 SPLIT I 55.' 41.' PUI 10UI YOLUlI P.U. 7:30 m 0.15 5:00 240 0.70 115 1112 1017 '4.2 53.2 11:10 U5 o.n 11:31 111 ...4 1581 4111 ':15 m 0.13 zm 5:00 m 0.71 . ..l .... ..-- . ........ IOtIIZ41. : S!. BIII!lDlJO . nLl: SBICml "'"' . ; IIWD emu Dt\IOUTI or I C 0 . Dlft: 1/ZI1tI UD\IIfIl: EASTBOUND WESTBOUND -.-..-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--------------------------.-. rID ....... nlD ....... ....... ..10 ....... ..... COIBIIID ..... Dll: muDll 'BOIl 11 PI 11 PI 11 PI --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------- 11:00 I .. . III II III 11:15 4 14 I 107 U UI 11:11 Z &I II 101 U III m1 11:45 I II II m 6 l4 105 U4 15 51 III 1:00 I TT 4 III I '101 1:15 Z II Z II 4 141 1:10 I II 6 14 U 110 ~ 1:45 I 14 14 Z68 5 II II 311 I II US IS! 1:00 3 84 4 III I 114 2:15 I 14 3 18 4 m 1:30 I II 3 81 4 151 /' ~ 2:45 4 I It m I II m US 5 It m m I:" I n I III 4 114 3:15 5 It I m 6 Z11 1:11 I II 2 115 5 111 z. 3:45 3 U TT m 3 I In HI I U III 101 4:00 I t1 1 1U I lIS 4:15 I II 1 1U 10 UI 4:30 II 61 I 111 II 114 4:45 15 U 14 104 6 15 In 503 U 51 In mIl 5'~ 14 J 3 "~ 11 1tt 5:15 U II ~ '],D I 141 ? b \ II 5:ID II 51 U m. It m ." 5:45 . 45 111 50 no 11 II 14 ill 51 HI It III 6:00 14 51 14 It 41 111 6:15 51 31 U 1U n 141 6:30 II It n II II 101 6:45 II U2 35 150 41 105 IS m m m 111 m 1:00 U II U IS 14 101 1:15 U II II II 111 111 ""1 12 34 l~ 51 "}~ II 1:45 54 III ~ 31 m 1~~ m 1t'lP 51 no 1t4 513 II m 1:00 II ~A 3Z 51 151 II 1:15 12 3Z II U 145 II 8:11 U I U III IUf &I 1:15 14 111 IS 111 us m if 100 III " no 1:00 15 II II if I4T 10 1:15 51 15 II 41 1U II 1:11 51 15 II n IU 12 1:45 II Z5l 14 II U 311 It 111 154 m u Z4I ID:OO II II 14 11 us II ~ 10:15 II I II 11 141 II ID:II U I 14 II Iff 10 11:45 II m I 31 IS 311 11 n In 5If If 101 11:" 10 I f3 II 153 II 11:15 15 I II II 144 II 11:30 n 5 II 11 150 m? 15 11:45 10 III 4 ZD liS m I 13 115 11 13 1- .....---......................----.---------------------------------------------------------.----------------------.-----------.-. '"OrlLI 1145 1151 1155 31U noD U1I , U TOTlloI 4004 ilOI IIU ~ SPLIT I 41.1' n.1 51.1 13.1 PllllOUt 11:10 1:45 1:11 5:11 1:10 1:15 fOLOI m m no 511 III 131 p.8.r. 0.15 0.1f 0.15 0.11 0.14 0.13 ~ VOill1411 : SjM 88iNjiDlMO I,U.J.. UA'uUJl .ram : IILLCUSf\IISf or I nun 0 0 14II\IlfJi: Dift: HUII1 ----------------~-------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------.----------..------------------- fIll fBUUDU -21 nuu-II UmDU -U Dub i..r.,. BIGI. II PI II .PI II PI II PI .---------------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12:0' 1 . 1 I I I r . 12:15 1 . 1 I I I . 12:31 I 3 1 I I I 1 t. 3 I~ 12:U 0 1 . I I I o . 2 1:00 1 3 1 I I I 1E -;;. 1:15 1 & 1 , , I 1:31 1 1 1 I I I 1 '::>. 1 1:15 1 . 1 I I , :J --+-- 1:0' 0 1 0 I I , 1:15 0 . . , , , o 0 . 1:31 0 11 0 , I I o 11 ~O 1:15 0 . 0 I I I o 4 3:0' 0 3 0 I , I 1)5 r-"- 3:15 4 1 4 I , I 1 ,,? 3:30 1 . 1 I , , 4 3:15 . 5 . , , , 5 4:'0 . 1 0 I , I T-'--- 4:15 0 4 0 I I , i~--l- ' 4:31 1 1 1 I , I 4:15 1 1 1 I I I 5:00 1 1 1 I , , 5:15 1 . 1 , , , I} _ " 5:3' 1 1 1 , , , ~ ~:~ 5:15 1 I 1 I I , &:00 1 3 1 , , I -f--- - .- 1:15 . 5 . , I , 4l \(, : \ \ 1:3' 5 1 I , I I I 1 I:U I 2 5 , I I 5 2 1:0' 3 i 3 I , I }. 5 1:15 1 2 1 , , I 2. \'? 1:31 5 . I , I , 5 ;/ 4. 1:15 1 2 1 , , I 1 1 1:0' 1 . 1 I , , '} . 1:15 5 2 5 I , I 5 \A- 1 \~ 1:3' 3 1 3 I I I 3 1 1:15 5 3 5 . I I I 3 ':'0 3 ,- 3 , I , '} , ':Ii Z I Z I I I : \1, ~ ? ':31 5 1 i I , I ':15 Z 2 2 I , , 22. 11:10 . 2 . I , , Ffb 11:15 I 1 I , I , 1':30 f 0 . I , , 11:15 i Z i , , I l} -: 11:10 . I I , I I 11:15 1 0 , , , I Z n 0 11:30 . 1 , I . I : \ :,- 1 '2r 11:45 1 1 I I . , 1 ---..------------...-----.-------------....-----.....---------....--........-.....-------------------.----------------............ mAL' 110 151 211 II I If . , -2 110 151 1 1111011 1:01 2:30 7:00 I I , 1:00 1:30 toLIII 12. 25 12 I , I 12 Z5 p.l.r. O. ft 0.51 I.n , , , I.n 0.51 . ..... I , I. 1" . - o o APPENDIX C TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT WORKSHEETS 1 f 24 iJ 11 .u JL o o SISNAl MARRANT ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: INLAND CEMTER DRIVE . 'I' STREET EllSTIMS CONDITIONS TRAFFIC VOlUIIES -------- l--------I---------I---------:----------1---------; , MORTH , SOUTH . . MESi , EAST , . . , , , , HOOR , BDUIlIl . BOIIllD , BOUND , BOUND , . . . . , , t----I----- ;------- :----: : 24-1 8 16 1 34 : 18 : 1-2 . 12 : 17 : 14 t 2-3 8 5 : 111 9 : 3-.\ I 5 : 8 : 13 : ~-5 I 8 : 1- . 42 : J . 5-6 I 14 ' 35 116 : 6-7 I ~3 185 232 : t 7-B I 117 363 211 : . 8-9 I 112 418 261 .. :: 9-11 I 117 3IB 252 . : 11-11 8 159 315 292 , 11-12 I 177 336 316 12-13 I 195 434 295 13-14 , I 181 , 369 26a 14-15 I 172 : 396 316 15-16 I . 155 : 471 331 16-17 . 167 : 513 314 17-18 I m: 561 221 , 18-19 I 133: 348 151 : 19-21 I 148 : m: 129 : 21-21 i! 128 : 211 : III: 21-22 I 'ill 166 : 81 : 22-23 8 46: 72 : 36 : 23-24 . 11: 63 : 21 : I------I---------l--------:----------~--------: ~ JJ UiTERSECTlOll: INLAIlD CEIITElQYE . 'I' STREET 0 EIISTIN6 CONDITIONS JOB 1IlIIl8EIl: 9Il241B PEOS PERIlOUR FOR B HOURS: I BATE: 14123/91 SCHOOL CROSSING IYES/Nol: NO B5TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 45 SYSTEM IYES/NOI: NO POPIlI.AtlOII: 511,nl NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS: I ..... PEAK HOUR DELAY IYEH-HRI: I NURBER OF LANES ON NAIN STREET: 2 NUIlBER OF LANES 011 MINOR STREET: 2 11---------:---------1---------:---------1---------: " , INTER- : COKBI- : , PEAK . " . , . 1--1--1---:----1 :-------:---1---11 YOLUME : RUPTlIlIl : NATION 1 4-l1l1ll : HlRIR , , , MIN : PERCENT : PERCEIIl :: MINOR : PERCENT : PERCENT 11----...:----1 -1---: -' , . , STREET : OF OF " STREET : OF , OF :: NARRANT : MARRANT : NAP.RANT : NARRAIIT 1 MARRANT : , .. . , HOUR , YOLIJIIE : KARRANT I: NARRANTIl : : yoLUME :NARRANT I:NARRANTII:: I iI . VIII IX II , , , :--I---t _t____::____:_____I___II____\____I___t___:__1 : 24-1 52 : 121: BX! J 16 m: 2n:: NO NO NO NO NO 1-2 31 : 71: 5"1. 12 m In:: NO NO NO NO . 10 ... 2-3 21: 51: ~%l : 5 41: n" NO NO NO NO NO " 3-4 21 : 51: 3"111 5 4%1 n" NO 10 NO NO 10 ." " 4-5 57: 141: 91" B 61: 11111 NO NO NO NO NO " 5-6 141 . 3411 22%1 : 14 I Ill: 21111 NO NO NO NO 10 6-7 337 Bll: 5311 I 43 : 311: 61%~ : NO NO NO IlO 10 7-8 563 1341: 8911 : 117 : 161: Imn NO NO NO NO 10 B-9 669 1591: lint: 112 : BIX: 1611:: NO YES YES NO 1 10 9-11 511 1361: 91%1 : 111: B41: unit NO : YES/llO . YES NO NO II-II 597 1421: 951: I 159 1141: 22n" YES : YESINO YES NO NO " ,. ~ : IH2 642 1531: 11211 : 117 1261: ~nt: YES YES YES YES" 10 : 12-13 729 1741: 1161: : 195 1391: 279%11 YES YES YES YES NO : 13-14 637 1521: 1111: : ISI 1291: 2Sn:l Y"" YES YES YES 10 ,~;) : 14-15 712 1111: 1131: : 172 I23X: 2"'lll YES YES YES YES IlO , 15-16 SI2 1911: 127%1 t 155 1111: 221111 v.... YES YES YES 10 ,:'::1 16-11 817 1921: 12S1 :: 167 1 11911 23m:: YtS YES YES . YES NO 17-IS 7S1 IS61: 1241: : 167 t, 1191: 2391:: YES YES YES YES NO 1B-19 498 . 119%: 79111 133 1 95X: 19111: YESiNO NO NO NO NO 19-21 399 1 951: 6311 : 14B : 1161: 2111::' YESINO NO NO NO 10 21-21 311 : 741: 4911 : 12B : 91%1 1831: ~ NO NO NO NO NO 21-22 246 : 59%: 39111 91 1 651: 13111 : NO NO NO NO 10 22-23 lIB : 261: 1711 f 46 I 331: 66%1 : NO NO NO NO NO I 23-24 B3 : 211: l~ln II: 81: 16m NO Nil NO NO NO 1--...--.------1 1-----: 1-----1-------1--1 :-----:--...---- 1------.----...1---1 SUlIIlARY: IARRANTS I REDUCED I NARRANT OBTAINEO? - --- I. NlllIlUN VOLlIIlE: YES II. INTERUPTlON: YES III. NINlftUN PEDESTRIAN: NO IY. SCIIOOL CROSSIN6: NO Y. PRD6. IlOYEIIENT: NO YI. ACCIDENT UPER: IlO VII. SYSTEIIS: IlO VIII. COMBINATION: YES IX. FOIll-HOUR: YES X. PiAK HOUR DELAY: 10 XI. PEAK HOUR VOL.: 10 )=911 I OF HOURS I OF HOlliS ------- -- S 2 8 2 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA II NIA 7 NIA NIA NIA I NIA 4- o - o SI6NAL MARRANT ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: INLAND CEIlTER DRIVE. 'I' STREET EIISTINS + PROJECT CONDITIONS TRAFFIC YDL~ES ------ :--------:--------:--------~:----------:---------j , NaRTH , SOUTH , MEST , EAST , , , , , , , HOUR , BOUIID , BOUIID , BDUND , BOUND , , , , , , , :----'----l--:---~---: : 24-1 I : 16 : 34 : IB 1-2 I : 12 : 17 ' 14 2-3 I : 5 : 11 9 3-4 I : 5 : B 13 4-5 I : B : 15 42 5-6 I : 14 : 35 116 6-7 I : 43 : 115 232 t 7-B I : 122 : 383 215 .; 8-9 I 13B 442 2B7 9-11 I 143 353 278 . : 11-11 I 215 366 33B : 11-12 I 216 375 335 : 12-13 I 235 487 , m : 13-14 I 214 415 312 14-15 I 2t4 . m 348 15-16 I 188 : 515 364- 16-17 I 215 : 553 342 17-18 I ' 214 : 611 257 . 18-19 I 172 I 411 189 : 19-21 I m: 319 158 : , 21-21 I 147 : 225 129: : 21"'22 I 116 : 186 95 : : 22-23 I 52: 81 42 : : 23-24 I 11: 63 21 : 1--------,---------1---------1----------1---------1 , . J , . . .d1 w".;lAr._ n,.... ,.".._.w._ INTERSEtTlDll: INlAND CEIlTER AE l 'I' STREET 0 EXISTIN6 + PROJECT CONDITIONS JOB NUMBER: 911241B PEDS PER IIOUR FOR 8 HDIIRS: I DATE: 14/23191 SCHOOL CROSSIN6 (YES/NOI: NO 85TH PERCENTILE SPED: 45 SYSTEM IYES/NOI: NO POPUlATlOII: 5H,"1 NUMBER OF ACCIDEIlTS: I PEAK HOUR DELAY IYEH-IlRI: I NUNBEI OF LANES 011 MIN STREET: 2 NUNlER OF LANES ON MINOR STREET: 2 : 1-----:------:------:-----1 " , INTER- : COMBI- : PEAl " , :___1____:___:____11___1_____1___:; VOLUME : RUPTlDN : NATlOII : 4-1lDUR : HOUR MAIN : PERCENT : PERCENT :: MINOR : PEJlCENT : PERCENT :: -------: ----: -l-----l--~ , SiREEi I OF OF " STREET : OF OF :: "ARRANT : "ARRANT : "ARRANT : MARRANT : NARRAIIT : , " HOUR , YllLUME : KARRANT I: KARRANTII: : YOlUME : "ARRAh' I: NARRANTI III I II YIII IX XI , ,____j____i__;___ll____i____I___::_____1 1--1 24-1 52 : 12%.: 81: : 16 I III: 232.:: NO NO NO NO NO 1-2 31 : 71i SIll 12 : 911 In:: NO NO NO . NO NO 2-3 28 : 51: 3%: : 5 : 41: 7%11 NO 110 NO NO NO 3-4 21 : 51: 3%1 : 5 : 41: 7111 NO NO NO NO NO 4-5 51 141: 911 : B : 61: 11%11 NO NO NO NO NO 5-6 141 341: 22'11 14: 111: 211:: NO NO NO NO NO ... 6-7 337 881: 531: : 43 : 311: 61%1: NO NO NO NO 110 7-8 59B 1421: 95%: : 122 : 871: 17411 I NO : YES/NO YES NO lID B-9 729 1m: 116%11 138 : 9'11: 1971:: YES/NO YES YES. YES ", lID '-II 631 1511: 1111: : 143 : IB21: 2142,:: YES YES YES NO 1: lID . It-II 714 1681: 1121: : 2B5 : 1461: 2m:: YES YES YES YES :;; 110 . 11-12 711 1m: 1131tl 216 : 1m: 294m YES YES YES YES NO 12-13 822 1961: 131111 235 : 1681: 3361:: YES YES YES YES YES 13-14 717 1711: 114111 214 : 1531: 316%:: YES YES YES YES NO 14-15 787 1871: 12511 t 284 : 1461: 2911:: y~;. YES YES YES NO 15-16 &79 2191: 1411:: 188 : 13m 2m:: YES YES _.: YES \ YES YES 16-17 895 2131: 14211 : 215 : 1461: 2m:: YES YES YES . , YES YES . 17-18 867 21611 138111 214 :. 1461: 2911:: YES YES YES . VES YES . . 18-19 589 1411: 9311 : 172: 1231: 24611: YES : YES/NO YES NO NO : 19-<1 467 . 1111: 74111 m: 1261: 25311 : YES NO NO NO NO : 28-21 354 : 841: 56111 147 : 1851: 2111:: NO NO NO NO NO : 21-22 281 : 671: 45111 116 1 761: 1511:: NO NO NO NO NO : 22-23 123 : 291: 2111 : 52 : m: 74111 NO NO NO NO NO : 23-24 83 : 2111 13111 II: 81: 161:: NO NO NO NO NO ;-----1-----:----:---; :------l----l-----; :-------:---...:-----1------:---: SUMARY: --- f REDUCED f "ARRANT >'''1 WARRANTS OBTAINED? . OF HOURS . OF HOURS ----- ---- ...----- ------- I. MININUM YOlIlE: YES II I II. INTERUPTlOIl: YES 18 . . III. MININUM PEDESTRIAN: NO NIA NIA IY. SCHDOl CROSSlN6: NO N/A N/A Y. PROB. 1lDYEIIENT: NO MIA N/A YI. ACCIDENT EIPER: NO NIA NIA YII. SYSTENS: NO N/A NIA VIII. CONlINATlOIl: YES 12 NIA IX. FOIlR-IlDUR: YES 9 N/A 1. PEAK HOUR DELAY: NO N/A NIA 11. PEAK HOUR VOl.: YES 4 NIA - o o SI6NAL IARRANT ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: INLAND tENTER DRIVE' '" STREET BACKSROUND CDNDITIONS TRAfFIC VOLUIlES ----------- : ---.. ~ -----: ------: ------- ~ -----: NORTH , SOUTH , NEST ; EASi , , , , , HOUR , BOUNll , BOUND , BOUND , BOUND , , , , , , , :--' l--......:---l---l : 24-1 I : 18 : 41 : ", ! .. , 1-2 I : 13 : 28 : 16 I 2-3 I : 6 ' 13: 11: 3-4 I : 6 11 : 15 J 4-5 I : 9 171 47 5-0 I : 15 42 121 6-7 I : 47 125 265 t N I : liB 421 241 . B-9 I : 124 465 013 ; ~ 9-11 129 361 2B8 : II-II , 175 345 331 : 11-12 195 381 347 : 12-13 215 : 488 334 . : 13-14 199 : 410 315 : : 14-15 191 : "6 : 358 : : 15-16 171 : 528 : 373 '1 : 16-17 184 : 565 : 345 : : 17-IB 184 I 631 : ~5 : .. : 18-19 147 : 399 : IBI : : 19-21 163 I 311 : 154 : : 21-21 141 : 231 : 131 : : 21-22 III : 191: 95 : : 22-23 51 : 85 : 46 : : 23-24 12 : 75 : 28 : :-----,----,---1----1---: ~ ~ - . . INTERsECTION: INLAND CENTER Q . 'I' STREET O. BAClC6RDUND CONDITIONS JOB NUIlBER: 9112418 PEDS PER HOUR FOP. a HDlJRS: I DATE: 14/23191 SCHOOL CROSSIN6 (YES/NOI: NO 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED: 45 SYSTEM IYES/NOI: NO POPULATION: 511,111 NUM8ER OF ACCIDENTS: I PEAK HOUR DELAY lVEH-HRI: I NUHBER OF LANES ON HAIN STREET: 2 NUMBER OF LANES ON UNlIR STREET: 2 II---------I---------I---------!---------:---------I " , INTER- : CONBI- : , PEAK . " , . . l--------l--~I--~I---------l!---------:---------:---------:l VOLUME : RUPTION : tlATlON : 4-HOIII : HOUR , , MAIN : PERCENT : PERCENT : I HlNOR : PERCENT I PERCENT ll--.....-..!----:...-------l-...----I -' , , STREET t OF , OF " 3TREEi : OF OF :: NARRANT : HARRANT : NARRANT : HARRANT : HARRANT : , . " , H!lUil , VOLUME :HARRANT I:WARRANTII:: YOLUKE lHARRANT I :HARRANTII:: I II , VIII II II . , , :---:--------;----1---11 l---l-----f 1----:--------1---1--1 : 24-1 62 : 1m 1111' 18 131: 26%11 NO NO NO NO NO 1-2 36 1 m 6" 13 n: 191: : NO NO NO NO NO .. N 24 : 611 411 6 41: '11" NO NO NO NO NO " 3-4 25 : 61: 41: 6 4" 911 I NO NO NO NO NO .. 4-5 64 I 151: 111: 9 61: 13%: : NO NO NO NO NO 5-6 162 : 391: 261: 15 m: 211: : NO NO NO NO NO 6-7 391 : '131: 621: 47 341: 67111 NO NO NO NO NO 7-ll 661 : 15711 1151: 118 841: 16'1: I NO YES YES NO NO 8-9 768 : 1831: 1221: 124 891l 177%:l NO YES YES YES .Il NO .' 9-11 649 15m 1831: 129 . 921: IB41:: YES/NO YES YES NO ~I NO : II-II 676 lUX: 11711. 175 : 1251: 2511:: YES YES YES YES "t I NO : 11-12 727 1731: 1151: : 195 : 1391: 2791:: YES YES YES YES ~: NO : 12-13 822 19m 1311:: 215 : 1m: 317111 YES YES YES YES , YES . . : 13-14 i2I 17211 11m: 199 : 1m: 28m: v.' YES YES YES NO .!:.:. : 14-15 814 1911: 12811: 198 : 13611 271m \':'~ YES YES YES NO '.. ; 15-16 . 911 2151: 1431:: 171 : 122%: 2m:: YES YES _: YES YES NO : 16-17 918 2m: 14411 : 184 : 1311: 2631:1 YES YES , YES YES YES , : 17-IS 886 . 2m: 1m:: 184 :! 1311: 2mn YES YES YES YES YES : 18-19 579 1381: 921: I 147 : 11511 211111 yr- I YESINO YES NO NO _0 : 19-21 464 11m 74111 163 : 1161: 233111 YES NO NO NO NO : 21-21 36. 861: 57111 141: 1111: 2m:: NO NO NO NO NO : 21-22 285 6811 45tll Inl m: 14nll NO NO NO NO NO : 22-23 13I 311: 2111: 51 : 301: 7311 : NO NO NO NO NO : 23-24 113 251: 16111 12 : ~11 In:: NO NO NO NO NO :----:--------,------1--..--: l---i---.....;-----..: :______:_____..._:_____:______:____1 SUMARY: --- I REDUCED I WARRANT >=911 WARRANTS OBTAINED? I OF IIlIURS I OF HOlliS ~ ------ ---- --- ---- I. MINIMUM YOLUIIE: YES II I II. INTERUPTION: YES II I 1.11. NINIIlUH PEDESTRIAN: NO NIA NIA IV. SCHOOL CROSSIN6: NO NIA N/A V. PRD6. HOVEIlEIIT: NO N/A NIA VI. ACCIDENT EIPER: NO NIA N/A VII. SYSTEMS: NO NIA N/A VIII. COMBINATION: YES 12 NIA II. FOUR-HDUR: YES 9 NIA 1. PEAK HOUR DELAY: NO NIA NIA II. PEAK HOUR YOL.: YES 3 NIA o o SI6NAl MARRANT ANALYSIS INiERSEtTIOMI INLAIID CENTER ORIYE . '!' 5iF.EET BACK&ROUND + PROJECT CONDITIONS TRAFFIC YDLUlIES 1-- :------:---:-------: ------1 , NORTH , SOUTH : WEST , EAST , . . , , . HOUR . BOUllD . BOIIID . BOUND , SOUND . . . . . . . 1__1___1_____:____..: : 24-1 I 18 : 48 : ,., I -- . 1-2 I 13: 21 : 1b J 2-3 I 6 : 13 : 11 ' 3-4 I 6 : II : 15 4-5 I 9 : 17 : 47 H I 15 1 42 : 121 6-7 1 62 : 145 : 2BI 1 . 7-8 1 144 : 454 : 267 8-9 I 151 I SlIm : m ~ . 9-11 I 175 : 422 I 334 I . r 11-11 1 , 2M; :\84 : 361 : 11-12 I : 235 : 4n : 3B7 : 12-13 1 : 249 : 534 : JoB : IJ-!4 1 : 231 : 459 : 337: . 14-15 1 : 223 : 491 : 391 : 15-16 I : 219 ' 578 : 411' : 16-17 I . 221 614 : J82 : 17-18 I 223 683 : 294 : IB-19 1 m UB : 219 : 19-21 1 182 335 : 173: 21-21 1 156 251 : 145 : 21-22 I 116 199 : III : 22-23 1 51 85 : 46 : 23-24 I 12 75 : 28 I 1--------1---------,--------,----------;---------1 J . . INTERSECTION: INLAND mYER QE t 'I' STREET BACY.GRaUND + PROJECT CONDITIONS JOB NU~ER: 911Z4!S DATE: e~;~3m e5in PERCE~TILE SPEED: ~S PQPULATION: S8e,Ple o PEDS PER HJUR FOR e HOURS: SeHGOL CROSSING iYES/NOl: SVSTEr-: ~YEStN[\}: e NO NO N~~aE~ OF AC::L~Ta: e t PEAr. HDUP. DE:..AY ;VEfoi-HF:): Hur.BE~ OF LANES ON ~A!N STREET: NU~ER OF LANES Uh ~INQ? SiP!:!: " ---------.---------:---------.---------,---------: ;--------:--------- ---------;---------: ;--------- ----~----.--------- !NTER- i ~Qr!I- ~ VOLJ~E : Rup,lnK: NATION: ~-nO"R: rEAr : HOUR : ~h!K : ?:R:~~; ; ?:R::~;;; ~INO~ F:P.:ENT ; PERCEN: . . ---------;---------;---------;--------- ---------~ H~~R ~!Q:..ur.; 'wARF.HN7 :. .A?;;rlt;;~: i . ::~E::T; ~ JF ~~~U~E ',A~~kK~ :;.~RHNT!: . ~4F.F;Ar.;T .ARRANT : WARRANT i ~ARr.A~T : WARRANT i~ YIl! IX Y.! : : 11::':'1 ~ :~ ----- _......---- -......------ .....----....- --------- --- -------- ------- --------;---------1---------'--------: :~-1 ~: ,e... ~ 1e: ~ ~ :E ,-.' , 10:; : NO NO NO ~o NO ..... ~... ! ~:; ..,: " 9:: i"'", NO NO NO NO NO . - .. :Olio, ; ~w .':lioll . . 24 e~! 'r~i : ~ 41: ;-: ~ I Ne NO NO NO NO ,-4 . e:i ,., ~ ' , Ul '11: i NO NO NO NO NO ,;.... 't.l I 4,5 " ~:i.; ~IIi ~ ~ b1l l~t: : NO NO NO NO NO '" 5-b '.L." ~l:"il ;j,'f II 15 I'''' 21:: : NO NO NO NO NO ... ".iol .._'011 Hili t...? 4~S le:'Zl 67,,: i b2 44:: BV%ll NO NO NO NO NO i-S 72! 172l: 114,: l 144 1131: 21611 : m YES YES YES NO S-9 B29 197:: 1~""111 158 Ie7%: 214'1: : YES YES ytS Y:~ , 10 ~.,;~.I i .. 111 H! m 1811.: 12!:l: 17S 125:: 251%: : YES YES YES YES .~ : NO ;1-11 744 1"''''''1 , ~ r::~ I I 214 1461: 291%: I YES YES YES YES " NO 1'..1 ..._11 .,.. 11-12 a21 i95l: 131:: ; m , 163%1 "-'II' I YES v.' v.' YE: " YES , .1..,110;'1 i .:.~ .:.= ; 1:-13 m ~'1 =-"i I 143ll: 249 17811 ~56Z: : YES Y"tS YES YES YES ......., ... " 796 1911, .......l ... 165:: nE:: I ,.-.. v.' v.. YES YES .,;.-~, ..';;'0.... . --. .. .:." l4-lS SBt 2le4~ lU:;':i :~3 1591: :n:!l YES yo. YES yo. ... c. t. l5-1:. m :15%; ~!71: ; 209 14'1; 2991: : \":; YES YES YES YES '-' ::-17 990 ~3'l! ~saz: ; 221 ~5El: 31b%t! ~'E; YOO YES YES YES t.: 17-~3 ;T! :::!l ~SSl: : ~3 ;.' lS'?%1 319%it v...... YES YES YES YES '-' 13-19 ;47 154l: :B3Il: m 126:: 251:: : y-'" v.. YES YES NO .t: t. 1;"2' S!G p1~1 fi'IIIII' 182 1311: 2e": : YES NO Y;:S NO NO -.... ..61011 Z2-21 m 941: '~"II 156 1111: ',,!,!~II YES/NO NO tf'l NO NO Q""II ........II 21-~2 311 il:: 481: I 116 761: lC::l~ II NO NO NO lJ:" hJ ..,:,..11 22-23 nl 31':C 21%1 i 51 3"'" 1"'''11 Nil ~D NO NO NO C,IO: ....:.11 :J-24 183 25:: In:l 12 m 1n:: N~ NO NO tfl Nr. :__...._..__~---------:--..----..-:---------l :---------i..-------..;---------~:---------:---------;---------\---------;---------; S:';P11\ARYt -..------ . REDUCED . WARRANT }=91: WARRANTS "mINEO' , Dr HOURS , OF ijOL~S ~ ---..---- -------- --------- --------- I. ftlNiftUft VOLUlIE: YES 13 II. INTERUPTION: Y'. I' I t. .. HI. NINlllUft PEDESTRIAli: NO NIA NIA IV. SCHOOL CROSSING: NO NIA NIA V. PROG. IlDVEIlENi: NO NIA NIA VI. ACCIDENT EXPER: NO NIA NIA YII. SYSTEftS: NO NIA NIA VIII. COKBlNATION: YES 13 NIA II. FOiiF.-l!OUR: YES 12 NIA I. PEAK HOUR DELAY: NO NIA NIA XI. PEAK HOUR VOL.: YES 7 NIA CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE LOCATION HEARING DATE " Sf C.OLLtGt Oil. .VNIO. pp'" ~ 1 . . I. m&~~ AGENDA """"l ITEM # I '~ . Iv '~ '4- I (j . . , .,~. .' ~' , ' Of ' '. .,}' I PLANoI.11 PAGE 1 OF 1 fWD) ,.~ ...".......-. IIUNi:) i:)IAlliS ...... I .. ..... _.... ...... ONlallYNlli8 NYI ~1 ,Ii I ,. '1- . I' ill i. I !ifl;i I! I' 1 fill. If I M rllf t~! Ii ;'J~I! :1 I I i "d!~ fi411~ ';!J!r' :f I I I ! H~2~ ! Ilfnl ~i~J:1I ~j: ~ ~ , . ~~:~ ~~ i ~. !!! i I I ii i , . . . :: J I, i! H..i.. Ii. H~I~' . 'l'~' i~~ , , 'J':: lif l'fr,'f~Jlf!f I~! 1::'I.~~n UI" ... : if .. Ji~ m In ... J ~~ m I Iii; Ijii i diJ 1111 . ~. '" ., ~ i . .' .,. .. ~> ~., ' " . .~.'." .. . . ".. . . '''' 1t'-_,~",.-_ 0;. ... ~. .- . . ~--~. -.... .~ ~~I('~" -~ ~. b : :~ ~.... '::.;::,;~ ;.~'- j,hol;" . ~. '.~~.w ".-~~:. .-,> Jm .. .. o AGENDA ITEM # ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE LOCATION o HEARING DATE crf't'CI_"-' - I r i . . I ._ .,~ . .' ll:' , . <If . " .~. I PLM4i." PAGE 1 OF 1 1.a.lO) r; - D. DETERMlNAnON On the basis 01 this in.ial study. GZ1 The proposed ptOject COULD NOT have a signHicant ellect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARA. TION will be prepared. O The proposed project could have a signHicant ellect on the environment. dhough there will not be a signijicant ellect in this case because the m~igation measures described above have been added to the ptOject. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o The proposed project MAY have a algnHicant eIIect on the environment. and an ENVIRONMENTAl IMPACT REPORT is required. ' ENVIRONMENTAl REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CAliFORNIA _"C.t Hwr~~r . IiM!/ifl~ I1....tAl<< Name and Tille ' ~~ Date: tf;"f,1 . ( ( ~.=.=:u ...oil ~ PAGE_OF_ ("<<11 l:Ill 01 .t~"c"l:.acnment .r ~n~Y OF SAN f6RNARDINO - re:MORANDUM To SGT. E.L. TULL From R. HARPS. CSR II l~ect CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #91-07 Date 08/06/91 Approved Date BRUNO SCHERRER 00 rn@rn~wrn ill) AUG 1 5 1991 OWNER: INVESTIGATION: CITY OF SAN BERNAAOINO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & I was assigned to investigate the Conditional Use ~~~mr~E~ff~07 submitted for the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and I Street. This de- velopment is to construct a 24 hour self service gasoline station/mini market with beer and wine sales, 24 hour five bay self serve car wash and lease .building for auto related services. The proposed site is located within reporting district SC317 which has crime stats 19 percent above the average for reporting districts in San Bernardino. Fifty-two percent of the Part II arrests for this district were alcohol related. During the past 90 day stats, 33 percent of the Part II arrests were alcohol related. The proposed site is located wi thin ABC census tract 50. The census tract has a population of 1,532 people. According to ABC records, there are two on-sale licensed premises with two allowed within this census tract. There are also five off-sale licensed premises with two allowed within this census tract as well as one wholesale licensed premise. The nearest on-sale licensed locations are The Skylark located 210' from the proposed site and Tudy's Tavern located 6/10 mile from the proposed site. The nearest off-sale licensed premise is the #1 Store located 119' from the proposed site. The nearest residences are approximately 81' across the street. The ad- dresses for these residences are 864. 840. three new homes under con-. struction. 818 and 812 S. I St'reet. The residence of 835 S. I Street is directly north or property line to property line of the proposed site. The nearest school is Urbita Elementary School located at 771 S. J Street. which is approximately 81' across the street from the proposed location. The Alice Burney School located at 1050 Olive. Colton. is ap- proximately 5/10 mile from the proposed site. The Saint Prophez Elis Greek Orthodox Church located at 1035 Inland Center Drive is approxi- mately 2/10 mile from the proposed site. The Lytle Creek Park is ap- proximately 9/10 mile from the proposed site. COMMENTS FROM AREA RES I DENTS: Diaz and I attempted contact with residents who live in - . . o o CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #91-07 PAGE 2 the area of the proposed site. The results are as follows. 864 S. I Street. Mary Chapman dalism in the area now. She mini market in the area. Leins said she thinks there is enough van- does not think it is a good idea to have a 840 S. I Street. Lupe Aragon was not opposed to the project. There were three houses currently under construction. 818 S. I Street. Richard Rivera is opposed to the convenience store. He feels that it brings violence into the area as well as graffiti. 812 S. I Street. no answer. 802 S. I Street. no answer. 835 S. I Street. Efren Ramos was not opposed to the project. This mini market development would fall under San Bernardino Municipal Code 19.23 which regulates the construction and operation of convenience stores. The spirit of this Municipal Code is to regulate convenience stores with less than 5.000 square feet of retail space. According to the plan submitted for the mini market. the retail space is approximately 3.100 square feet. This Municipal Code. under Section D. also says. "No convenience store shall be located less then 1.000' from an existing or previously approved convenience store or an existing elementary. junior high or high school as measured from the nearest distance from one prop- erty line to another." As previously mentioned. there is an existing mini market located at 841 S. Inland Center Drive. The #1 Store. whose property line is located ap- proximately 119' from the property line of the proposed site. Urbita Elementary School's property line is approximately 81' from the property line of the proposed site. This proposed development of a mini market falls under the spirit of the convenience store regulation of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. The proposed site is located less than 1.000' from an existing mini market and an existing elementary school. Due to these facts. the San Bernardino Police Department recommends denial of this Conditional Use Permit #91- 07. ..L . . . o o June 27, 1991 To: DET. SGT. Tull, Vice Detail, Police Department From: Mike Finn, Planning Department RE: Conditional Use Permit No. 91-07; To construct a 24 hour self-service gasoline station/ mini-market with beer and wine sales, a 24 hour 5-bay self-serve car wash and lease building for auto related services at the northeast corner of Inland Center Drive and "I" Street. The above referenced project was reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on June 20, 1991. At that meeting, the applicant indicated intent to include beer and wine sales at the mini-market. Attached is a copy of the plans for your investigation, review, and comment. As presently proposed, the mini-market is subject to MC-770, the City's Ordinance governing construction and operation of convenience stores. The reason that the proposal is subject to the ordinance is that the application was submitted prior to June 3, 1991 and was also complete prior to that date (May 22, 1991). The applicant intends to modify the plans, either increasing the floor area of the mini-market over the 5,000 square feet or attaching the mini-market to the lease building. Either would exempt the proposed project from the applicability of the ordinance. As background, there is a school north of the site across "I" Street, and another convenience store across Inland Center Drive. Hence, the applicant's desire to revise/modify his plans so that he is not subject to the thresholds of HC-770. Please complete your review and report as soon as Scheduling of the project for Planning Commission is upon the receipt of your report. If you have any please call me at X3331 or X5057 to leave a message. possible. dependent questions, Thank you for your cooperation. AJIO;. Tth/4WWt-- ..2 7S--CS~- ~~ Associate Planner ...L Attachment "G" , . .. HI If ;i: !; ii !i I !;~1111~1 :;i? ;;I?! ;:...- ....-.. i i'ii; :Ii! -: h!i: !:~. ..i WI! . '::':lil! gil ~;i i, ~~; ~i; i~! :~~ ! -::-'iiU i. . :! E~! It'::: ~'i :1: j ~,! i!; ;; ~i'i!111i ~.ql I! !i; ,:: II HE 7;= IE: ;H i:::.. Ii; : .:1: iii !~i ,-,I :I;: -~- jjli:i .......;" I "bEg iiiii~1 " . . ! ~ i ! i . :1 i _.;~ !ii ; -,'I! - "" ' ,'-- 1,,"- , !;, . 2i i :i!~ i.i11 ~~ l ~~ i ~ i I --"'";~ .---- -I I,~>~ I ~ E- --~t.a --- . _I i , >7 \ 'I" ..,-;;;; , ;~ I :i~~!f-'-:- ~ . , ~1 __ ), : I ,~; - \..------ ,', -I !oJ -....... \3-- J\L....: ..... --- J / .p : :~~=-=_ ",f'",j 1 ~l , ~I -- , '" l= f-- / ,/' / ,1 , . ".-' l I I , " '. ~~ " .. ~ ,.' , ...L. o o ~. '':i.~~~.:.-~~_, ". ,'.50...._____,,_ :..JBI ;~.~........-_.-- ~ ........--- --... I> ~ ~ ;~ ~ ,ii ,ii ~ tBJ.N30 DJ\H3S Olmf ONCRIVNY3S NVS ... ,. ...", '1 ..., iii. :u IUp: ..: ~~~ ~ :;:1: "" "'I" j ~~ ~;: ~ J. L: ~ ;;; . ~~~ ~ II H 1.... ~~:~! ~~ ~ i; :: i !Jij!!: i !oj js i(!l j liilli iil!;l~~ I 51111- Ili;;l;; 111 Ii i-- - !:; JI; i ,- ii-! d! !Il' ml f J 1:~ 'j ':d ~ : 11 , . '1 I! I: " ,I . .:1 ffi , . . ! ~i Uf ! "-J, b 11;.. I, t'. I i,,,,,,,. It _ ::. r -r 'J'I ~: ..~ I !Ilri, I" 3 ! -'::;':1 i - r j; ! :Jl~!i li I i!! Ji -I lJ'ii ? ;1-. ;I! l! II! Iii - 1.11Ia" ,I I I!l!~i ,l1!U ': lili! ',; II ;'!!i i ~I~~i i;~:! !i '!; I i ~ Il~:n ~ I~ m !inki ~i; ~ 1-" I'" === lin , . . " ,II , , ~: !! , i ~ ,. ii . i: . ~, Ii II \, \ ~ @ z c K! I!:!! ii, ~ ffiIlru I . . . illITD -- i I I > .. ,- '. ~, " , , , I ' l ; , . I, '-. p: , I , I 'I I, I I o -- -..-- II -------- -----.- .,....-- --.--'-r'," ." .' .~ ,. . " i" , I ., -":1 it,.. ,I [ l ! -, , ' -, ~ -, .. I I ", .. I It 0" I .h o '.,:1 _.......... 1-"1 I .. ...... ...... .-,111 HUta:) 3:)IAHilS oJ.ny ONIOHYNOS NYS I: "' z c ~ ~l ~ I. ~ ! / I 'I I i G"1~~1' II 1!Y' , , ~;... . i, :1 " !. ! , ,II 'II: I.... l ~ I' I! ., ~.! L J. ii . -I l' , ~-' r , :===1 - ~i ~; .... ~. ..I ~..- (" :1 "'- I i , I ,I 'I 0 -. It! , . Ii" '{ I. ~ 0 '-- ~m ; ~ ~ - .~ . . . o o I --- ---- II --------- '. ----.- ~. t tl CII, I ..~ .............. ...,.. I .. ...,. .....0 ...... I H3J.tGI:) lI:)IAlIlIS OJony ONIGlIYNlIlI8 NYS' I I . J C . I " 0 0 i .~ I I'! ~ " '. 'Ii Ii I ;!'l , 'I I , , 0 0 --- .~,. , ~ I. .:- . \.~ ~.." "',' "- . . t5~ 1__: ""0 I 0 zd ! 4" ~.~ ~ WI I I....,! lI,' '---' i 0 ~'0 :0 lU II ,- /----- 'I&. ; .t, t .... I ' 1-' - '---....-/ i III L ";" =0 - i e ~ ./-......., -~ , I l l ~... '. " i '=' - i I e I ,j ~ I , I " ! '-, .' ~. -::::!: ~,. : ~. I ....:2 I] -=- I 5 r. . , , Ii - .. " : !' :: III I -.. il i; , ,.-...-- f...:_~_ ... ....- ..- t,. ~f':~, ,- I"~_. ,. I t5 I i . . o t. --. .. ~m ~:I. ; . ..., ~ .....-~, '-"':'..~'~7". _.~:-:!'..':'. ~ o .~~. '-""..-.--.' . .... w. , , I i 'III !i ". ., n . . ~ . . ;;'''''''' ~ l ~ ,u II /:llii /1 ~ / :----, ( r~ It ;u !!'- .~ '" 1 d II ~ I ~ ,I, It q ~-., ~ I i .:~ I .. I . J "-'r- ~ - . 7- ", . , -.;.-........ -."; ,-, -.;. j'k;,~.. ~~.\...,,' ~~"...'.OI~~(;..U~!..~r- <(. j~- ..~JJ....I . . C. ,-', . II il [ ~;1 ~~ /l) t i ~ i ., ;: I t I i " ! ~ t;~ S ~ . C' t:E jii ~ ., ~ttachment "H" 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE PM 14067/CUP91-07 ""I ,.. ,.. AGENDA ITEM # LOCATION 4 HEARING DATE ~-1 7-91 to.. I IT C.OLLtGt D~. ~VNIO. p~E'E i . r-' 'i- 'ly . .~ '.t , Ii . !w . . I _ .,~. .' ~' . . 't . .. ,~. - i I ~J:' _ PLAN-1.'1 PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-10) , . o o Resolution No. 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE 2 DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-09 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN 3 BERNARDINO. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 5 6 7 SECTION 1. Recitals (a) The General Plan for the City of San Bernardino was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-159 8 on June 2, 1989. 9 (b) General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 to the General Plan of 10 the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning commis- 11 sion on September 17, 1991, after a noticed public hearing, and 12 13 the Planning commission I s recommendation of approval has been considered by the Mayor and Common Council. 14 (c) An Initial Study was prepared on July 30, 1990 and re- 15 viewed by the Environmental Review Committee and the Planning 16 Commission who both determined that General Plan Amendment No. 90- 17 09 would not have a significant effect on the environment and 18 therefore, recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted. 19 20 public review period from August 16, 1990 through September 5, 1990 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (d) The proposed Negative Declaration received a 21 day and all comments relative thereto have been reviewed by the Planning commission and the Mayor and Common Council in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local regulations. IIII IIII IIII 28 IIII 1 . . o o 1 (e) The Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public 2 hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General Plan 3 Amendment No. 90-09 and the Planning Division Staff Report on 4 October 21, 1991- 5 (f) The adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 is 6 deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City and 7 is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the 8 existing General Plan. 9 SECTION 2. Neaative Declaration 10 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the 11 Mayor and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General 12 Plan of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect 13 on the environment, and the Negative Declaration heretofore 14 prepared by the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of 15 this proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. 16 SECTION 3. Findinas 17 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the 18 City of San Bernardino that: 19 A. The change of designation from IL, Industrial Light to CG-l; 20 commercial General on 2.077 acres located at the northeast 21 corner of Inland center Drive and "I" Street for the proposed 22 amendment will change the land use map only and is not in 23 conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the 24 General Plan. 25 IIII 26 IIII 27 IIII 28 IIII 2 . . . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 B. C. D. 9 10 11 12 E. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 A. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IIII 28 IIII o o The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. All public services are available to the study area. Any development permissible under the CG-l, Commercial General designation proposed by this amendment would not impact on such services. The proposed amendment is to redesignate 2.077 acres to CG- 1, Commercial General. The deletion of this acreage from the IL, Industrial Light designation will have a minimal effect on the balance of land uses within the City and no housing stock will be affected. The amendment site is physically suitable for the requested land use designation. Anticipated future land uses have been analyzed in the Initial study and it has been determined that project specific mitigation measures will be sufficient to eliminate any environmental impacts. SECTION 4. Amendment BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino is amended by changing approximately 2.077 acres from IL, Industrial Light to CG-l, Commercial General. This amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 and its location is outlined on the maps entitled Attachment A, and is more specifically described in the legal description entitled Attachment B, copies of which are attached and incorporated herein by reference. 3 . . o o 1 B. General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 shall be effective 2 immediately upon adoption of this resolution. 3 SECTION 5. MaD Notation 4 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be 5 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously 6 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are 7 on file in the office of the city Clerk. 8 SECTION 6. Notice of Determination 9 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of 10 Determination with the County Clerk of the county of San Bernardino 11 certifying the City's compliance with CEQA in preparing the Negative Declaration. 12 13 I I I I 14 IIII 15 I I I I 16 I I I I 17 I I I I 18 I I I I 19 I I I I 20 IIII 21 I I I I 22 IIII 23 IIII 24 IIII 25 IIII 26 IIII 27 IIII 28 IIII 4 . . o o 1 RESOLUTION.. .ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF IMPACT AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2 GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 3 ENVIRONMENTAL 90-09 TO THE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by 4 the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a 5 6 7 meeting therefore, day of held on the , 1991, by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: ~ ~ ABSTAIN ABSENT 8 ESTRADA 9 REILLY 10 HERNANDEZ 11 MAUDSLEY 12 13 14 15 MINOR POPE-LUDLAM MILLER 16 17 18 19 of 20 21 22 Approved as to 23 form and legal content: 24 JAMES F. PENMAN, 25 Ci~y~A rney _ 26 BY..__.~ / 27 28 City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day , 1991. W.R. Holcomb, Mayor City of San Bernardino 5 . . o LOCATION MAP o General Plan Amendment No. 90-09 ~ - FlARCEL MERGER ,,~ l i~ . A"ea,or. m., t:~-- (!'M~ ~-- % L. '%nclu+... \ Li~ht +. ~.I. C ..........ci..' &e.....1 ATTACHMENT A . . CITY F SAN BERN RDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-09 TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL MAP 14067 DESCRIPTION Lot 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 10, Urbita, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 3, Page 54 of maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. Also that portion of alley lying between Lots 6 through 14, abandoned by resolution from the City of San Bernardino, recorded April 25, 1988 as Instrument No. 88-122560 of official records. NOTE: An Assessor Parcel Number has yet to be assigned by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office. Prior to consolidation of parcels by Parcel Map No. 14067, Assessor Parcel Numbers were 141-192-12 through 20. ATTACHMENT B j