HomeMy WebLinkAboutR08-Economic Development Agency
W H'.
.~
-
--
/
o
. SAN BERNARDINO
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
DISTRICT
441 West 8th Street. San Bernardino. CA 92401.1007. Ph. (714) 884-2533
,.
o
CRAFCON~
billS
coUEl;E
(I)
September 10, 1991
W. E. Leonard
Post Office Box 1367
San Bernardino, CA 92402
\()
.....
:::0
rn
n
r:!!
<
'T.
o
,
-,
~
.....
0\
.."
~
~
o
-<
'~J
,-
fT]
-;:"J
c<;
As a follow-up to our telephone conversation of September 5, 1991 regarding the
encroachment problem of the Pacific Savings Building on to our property, I
believe that your survey and our survey are in agreement and, although I have not
measured the actual inches, I will accept S/lOths of a foot as the actual
building encroachment.
As I told you on the phone, there is a further complication to the encroachment
problem which I discussed with the Board two years ago. I also had follow-up
conversations by telephone and written corre~pondence with several people at
Pacific Savings Headquarters in Costa Mesa. They failed to respond to our
letters so we have just placed the matter on hold knowing that future sale of the
property would cause the encroachment problem to be resolved at that time.
The problem to which I refer is one that we encountered when we cut doors and
windows on to the former Miles property from our current building. We were
informed, after an inspection by the Fire Department, that doors and/or windows
which open on to a property line require a 10 foot non-buildable easement as per
San Bernardino City Fire Code. Since there are both doors and windows on the
eastern end of the Pacific Savings Building, that same fire code applies to the
building and adds 10 feet to the encroachment for the nonbuildable easement along
the full eastern width of the building.
The Board did discuss the problem and did discuss the fact that we are willing
to sell enough property to provide the easement on the condition that the ease-
ment language provide access over it to our district. I am sure the Board will
be happy to discuss terms and conditions with you or through their agent to
resolve this problem. The only alternative I can see is to move the building or
remove 10 feet of the eastern end of the building and that does not appear to be
an acceptable alternative.
t"J114 /l/~~d c::...c</M?
wr ''1JI
..
AI _
~
.;
~
o
o
..
Easements
September 10, 1991
Page 2
I hope this provides you with the information you need. I believe the person at
the Fire Deparblent with who. we discussed the requirements was Chief Park or
Parks. If you need further infonnation, please feel free to call me at any time.
~ I (. J '0<
I trhflaH' It/ -L\n~.rrv
oman D. Smith
Director
Planning/Research
NDS:djb
cc: Dr. Bundy
Jack Sheman