Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR05-Economic Development Agency o o o . - .ij1 L - - . o o ECOKOMIC DEVELOPMEIIr AGEIICY OF TIlE CITY OF SAIl BERlWmIKO REOUEST FOR COIKrSSIOB/COmrCIL ACTIOB From: TIMOTHY C. STEINHAUS Agency Administrator Subject: PERFORMIIIG ARTS CEllTER FEASIBILITY STUDY Date: September 10, 1991 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SvnoDsis of Previous Commission/Conncil/Committee Action(s): The Community Development Commission previously appropriated $25,000 for a Performing Arts Center feasibility study. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Motion(s): (Co..unitv Deve]onMPnt Commission) That the Community Development Commission review the attached proposal for a performing arts center feasibility study and take appropriate action based upon said review. TI . STEIIIIWJS, Adainistrator Economic Develo~ent Aaenc:y ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact person(s): Tim Steinhaus/John Wood Phone: 5081 Project Area(s): CC: CCN Ward(s) : One (1) Supporting Data Attached: Staff ReDort: ProDosal FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $ 13.500.00 Tax Increment Source: Budget Authority: Closed Session CDC Action ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commission/Council Botes: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TCS:JMW:kak:4220H COIKrSSIOB AGEllDA Meeting Date: 09/16/1991 Aaenda Item Bo: -~ o o o Jl ~ - -- - o o ECOBOMIC DBVELOPImIIr AGDCY OF THE CITY OF SAIl BBRBARDIBO STAFF IlBPORT Performing Arts Center Feasibi1itv Studv Attached is a proposal from Richard Caplan & Associates to prepare a feasibility study of a Performing Arts Center for the City of San Bernardino. The proposed study would consist of two (2) phases: the first is a market analysis, including a survey of existing local and regional facilities, projections of support and programming and analysis of area demographics and sites; the second is an implementation strategy, including recommendations on management and operational programs, a preliminary time-line and an analysis of funding sources and strategies. Staff has investigated the qualifications of Richard Caplan & Associates and is sstisfied that they possess the background and experience to perform a study of this kind. Recently, they completed a feasibility study for the City of Redlands Redevelopment Agency and are currently assisting the City of Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency in the preparation of another such study. The consultant proposes to complete both phases of the study within sixty (60) days of authorization to proceed, at a cost of $13,500. They are requesting that an up-front retainer fee of $3,375 be remitted with the authorization to proceed. The Community Development Commission previously appropriated $25,000 for a Performing Arts Center feasibility study, so ample funding is available for this research. Sta~~ends adoption of the form motion. ~--~ TIMOTHY C. STBIlUIAUS, Adllinistrator Economic Deve101Blent Agency ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TCS:JMW:kak:4220H COMMISSIOW AGDDA Meeting Date: 09/16/1991 Agenda Itea Ro: s - - - 71'"1 QdlroZ<[J, , " " J " RICH(j-D CAPLAN B ASSO<()\TES ......~> , c:> City of San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency Attn: Councilmember Esther Estrada, Chair Ways and Means Committee 300 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 July 5, 1991 '...~ /~ /' '/ Re: Performing Arts Center Feasibility Study Dear Council Members: We appreciated the opportunity to meet with Councilmembers Estrada, Miller, as well as Susan Feller and Tim Steinhaus on July 1, 1991 to discuss the city's need to obtain an independent feasibility study for the proposed Performing Arts Center in San Bernardino. This letter will summarize our presentation and outline the proposed services, our firm's qualifications to perform this study, the timing and fees associated with this exciting project. The purpose of this study is to provide the City, the Inland Empire Symphony Association and other appropriate groups with the objective data and professional assistance necessary to objectively evaluate the needs, use and benefits of this important potential project. o SCOPE OP WORK In order to perform this study, we will undertake this project in two phases performing the following tasks: PHASE I. MARKET ANALYSIS TASK 1. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS - A comprehensive analysis of the regional and local demographic setting will be performed including population trends, age, income, employment and related conditions impacting local and regional growth trends. TASK 2. INTERVIEWS OF LOCAL ARTS GROUPS - Confidential interviews with no less than 25 key individuals, as well as all existing performing arts groups which may be use of the facility will be conducted. TASK 3. SURVEY OF EXISTING FACILITIES - We will visit other comparably sized and potentially competitive facilities and collect relevant data on their attendance, funding, programming, operations and related information as it may impact a new facility in San Bernardino. o CALIFORNIA OFFICE MIDWEST OFFICE 3320 Clinton Parkway Ct. Suite 220 C"" Lawrence, KS 66047 .::; ."'~." O.A~ .7'4 &:1: .. t...... 01'1/ ~A1.n1?7 3147 Blythe Street Highland. CA 92346 ~.. 4 , tt",A ~o....,,' o o o Proposal for "perfoQng Arts FeasibQty 2 study" Page Center TASK 4. SURVEY OF OTHER REGIONAL FACILITIES - Similar data collected in task 3 will be gathered for regional facilities in order to be ascertain how a new facility will potentially "fit" into the performing arts marketplace in Southern California, in general, and the Inland Empire, in particular. TASK 5. SITE LOCATION ANALYSIS - An objective evaluation of the three alternative sites will be performed considering access, parking, acquisition cost, etc. leading to a summary of the pros and cons of each site and a formal recommendation. TASK 6. PROJECTED SUPPORT AND PROGRAMMING - Based on the interviews, assessment of potential needs and the place for such a facility in the regional arts market, we will project the expected support, in terms of a performance forecast and audience attendance, and recommend the most appropriate program area(s) most able to contribute to the success of a new facility. TASK 7. INTERIM REPORT - At the end of Task 6, we will summarize our data, analysis and interviews into a written Phase I Report. We will meet with you to discuss our findings to date and assist and determining the potential overall timing for the facility. PHASE II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ---------------------------------- TASK 1. FUNDING SOURCES AND STRATEGIES - Based on preliminary cost estimates which the City will assist in providing, we will describe the public, private and not-for-profit funding alternatives which are most suitable for the facility and recommend financing strategies to pursue these objectives. TASK 2. RECOMMENDED MANAGEMENT / OPERATIONAL PROGRAM - As a result of the information collected and analyzed from Phase I and the expected funding for the proposed facility, a recommended management and operational plan will be developed. This plan will consider the role of professional service contracts, local public agencies and other successful strategies currently in use by comparably sized facilities in Southern California. TASK 3. PRELIMINARY TIME-LINE - Based on the overall need, potential funding, the site selected and other factors, we will prepare a time-line for the next steps and appropriate schedule for the planning and development of the facility. TASK 4. FINAL REPORT - The final results, findings, conclusions and recommendations from both phases will be presented and bound into a Final Report for the City, the Inland Empire Symphony Association and other appropriate community interests. After presentation of the report, we are also be available, as needed, to provide additional services related to the actual implementation of this project. 5 o o o - proposal for "perfO~ng Feasibi9ty 3 Study" Page Arts Center QUALIFICATIONS Our firm is uniquely well qualified to assist San Bernardino with this important project as a result of our experience is performing similar feasibility studies in the past, our expertise in working as professional administrators in the performing arts and our recent work performing needs analysis in the area for other communities in the Inland Empire. * * * Richard Caplan - has been performing feasibility studies for government and business since 1984, including similar performing arts projects in Napa and Concord, California, and Colorado. Recently, a feasibility study was completed for the Redlands Redevelopment Agency and the firm is currently assisting the City of Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency with a feasibility study. We have also served on the Board of Directors of several arts organizations over the past 15 years. * * * Sonia Baker - has more than 10 years experience as a professional arts administrator for regional groups including planning for the development and programming of a $12 million performing arts center in Lawrence, Kansas, and a cultutal needs assessment for La Crosse, Wisconsin Her educational background includes a Master degree in Urban Planning. Resumes and a firm description are attached to this proposal. Also enclosed in this packet are copies of two other studies, a feasibility study for the city of Redlands Redevelopment Agency and a draft copy of a market analysis on behalf of the proposed Napa valley Opera House project. TIllING AND FEES We are prepared to begin our services immediately upon authorization to proceed. The total time to complete the entire study WILL NOT EXCEED 60 DAYS. A written Interim Report summarizing our findings and analysis to date will be provided to you at the end of Phase I, to be completed as follows: PHASE 1. MARKET ANALYSIS 5 - 6 Weeks PHASE II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 2 - 3 Weeks ------- TOTAL: Not to exceed 60 DAYS The TOTAL fees associated with this study, including all expenses and 12 bound copies of the "Pinal Report", will be $13,.500. A 25 percent retainer, or $3,375., is required upon authorization to proceed. Thereafter, you will be invoiced as the work proceeds. 5 o o o ill) _ Proposal for "perfoQ,nq Feasibfrlty 4 Study" paqe Center Arts To indicate you approval of these services, please authorize the exe- cution of a copy of this aqreement which will serve as a contract for these professional services. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on behalf of the citi- zens of San Bernardino and look forward to assistinq you with this excitinq project. "7(;::';;' Richard Caplan RICHARD CAPLAN & ASSOCIATES ACCEPTED : for the city of San Bernardino date 5' I J 1 ~ J. - o o RICHARD CAPLAN 8 ASSOCIATES o .B.1~J:IAB.D CAPLA~ & ASSOCIA TES is a consulting firm offering a wide range of professional services including market studies. economic and strategic development assistance. The firm is committed to the highest quality and timely assistance leading to informed decision-making for public officals. development companies. small businesses and lenders. Our advisory services include o -site selection -timing and sequence of development -public/private partnersh ips -project approval/permit assistance -highest and best use determination -selection and liaison with other consultants; Feasi.b.\.Wv Analyses -definition, identification and evaluation of potential market support -analysis of supply and demand factors -estimates of sales based upon project characteristics -economic and fiscal impact analyses -project sizing and timing; Econom\sLDevel.$lpment Servm -economic-based studies -economic development strategies -alternative revenue sources -sources of public funding -socioeconomic analyses -renewal site evaluation and planning. o 5 o () o 11 - - - .' R1C'ORD CAPLAN 8 ASS<O:IATES Richard Caplan, Principal, has 16 years of business and public sector experience with a variety of private and public projects throughout the midwest and western United States. His firm has successfully assisted cities, not-for-profit corporations, small businesses, lenders and development companies with services ranging from market studies, economic impact analyses, business development strategies and land development. Clients have ranged from small municipalities to a national company developing a 3,300 acre new community. Prior to establishing his own firm, Mr. Caplan was a manager for Laventhol & Horwath, a national management consulting and public accounting firm. His role included client responsibilities with national firms including Chevron Land & Development Company, The Rouse Company and major hotel chains, as well as small cities and independent business persons. The diversity of projects he managed included renovation of small retail centers to financing alternatives for a $15 million civic center. Mr. Caplan served as city manager of Vail, Colorado for five years. As city manager, the community successfully initiated and completed several major public and private projects leading to expansion and diversification of the city's economy. In addition to routine m~nagement responsibilities, several innovative public/private partnerships were established leading to successful results for both the city and the private sector. Prior to Vail, he was assistant city manager/director of economic development of a rapidly growing suburban city in California. During that time, his role included budget administration and leading the city's efforts to expand and diversify its commercial and employment base. Mr. Caplan received his B.A. degree and Masters of Public Administration from the University of California, Berkeley. He has been an instructor and guest lecturer at the University of Southern California and U.C. Santa Barbara. He has served on the Board of Directors of several statewide professional associations, as well as the Board of Directors of two Development Corporations. CALIFORNIA OFFICE MIDWEST OFFICE 3320 Clinton Parkway Ct. Suite 220 r Lawrence, KS 66047::; 3147 Blythe Street Highland, CA 92346 . o o o - - w o o Sonia E, Baker PROFILE Effective combination of interpersona~ analytical and organizational skills. Strengths include (1) program design, development, and direction, (2) management of marketing and promotions. (3) coordination with existing loca~ area and regional arts and cultural organizations, (4) design of policies and procedures. (5) budget preparation and administration, (6) grant-writing, fundraising and development, (7) public speaking and community outreach, (8) leadership of volunteer and support organizations. Experienced motivator, coordinator and catalyst. Can focus the efforts of diverse groups onto common goals. Able to access key decision-makers and benefactors. build effective networks. and create synergistic relationship.;. Systematic in approach, ..Teating information nows, alliances. and operating procedures that endure. Highly energetic. EDUCATION School of Business Administration, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona M.S., Urban Planning, 1979 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon BA, General Arts & Letters, 1957 Renton High Schoo~ Renton, Washington Diploma, Valedictorian EXPERIENCE University of Kansas. School of Fine Arts, Lawrence. Kansas, 9/87-9/90 Education/Membership Coordinator, Office of Concert, Chamber Music, New Directions Series Developed programs to promote and enhance audience appreciation. Targeted community "market segments" and develOped promotioaal and educational activitiesl events to reach them. Initiated and built relationships with area arts organizations. MaJrim;7ed "reach" through effective use of resources. Promoted and managed volunteer supporters. Located and developed corporate sponsorship. Promoted and facilitated the Swarthout Society (auxiliary member organization). Special projects: V.I.P. host to Resident Artists; created the Young People's Performance events; developed the F'"1ve- Year EducatioaaI Long-Range Plan to expand programs and coordinate with opening of the Ued Center for Performing Arts in 1992; produced annual Swarthout Society Membership Brochures, as weD as the regular publication of the Swarthout Society Newsletter. Concurrent with this full-time position, maintained community service efforts: Chamber of Commerce, Cultural Affairs Committee (Arts Calendar of Events, Business and the Arts Awards); Downtown Lawrence Business Association ("Main Street' Program of Events); and City of Lawrence (Arts in Public Places Program). Western Wisconsin Regional Arts, La Crosse, Wisconsin, 11/80-6/87 Arts Adminidrator Provided leadership, direction and daily management of a seven-county, tri-state Regioaal Arts Council Reported to the Board of Directors; coordinated all working committees; interpreted and implemented Board policies; established daily operating procedures; supervised all staff and volunteers; managed the organization's central facility, a federally designated Historical Landmark building housing arts organization offices, visual and performing arts events, classes and community events. Developed and controDed $100,000 operating budget, including monics Crom grants, fundraising activities, corporate donors and private beneCactors. 5 o o o -~ - JIjI .' Initiated and mQ:' ed close relationships with member orgaf"'\tions; ensured positive press and public relations the larger community; served as liaison lw(:ity Hall. Executive Coordinator of all services to member organizations, scbools, and regional communities. HigbIigbts: Won 17 foundation and government grant awards; founded and served on Executive Committee for United Fund for the Arts & Humanities; organized the Coordinating Committee of Arts Organizations Representalives; initiated and found funding for a successful building restoration project for organization beadquarters, including historic preservation funds; increased visibility for tbe arts through marketing techniques, including extensive use of free media exposure and public speaking. University of Wisconsin. La Crosse, Wisconsin, 1980 LTB Research Associate, Center for Regional Studies Conducted a pilot research project on the impact to and requirements of older adults living in a rural regioa. Made key contributions to project desiga. Made contacts, conducted interviews, provided evaluation for potential of P.O.E. (Post Occupancy Evaluation) for a behavior assessment tool. Developed the written summation. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development, Tucson, Arizona, 1978-1979 HUD Intern, City Planning Department, City of Tucson Designed and establisbed a Plan Monitoring System to give planning staff more precise information and access to resources for use in neigbborbood-by-neighborhood planning. Organized the project, conducted original research; wrote, tested and emplaced the system. Wrote guidelines for maintenance and evolution of tbe system. Also provided related grant research for programs oriented toward families. CONSULTANCY Wyoming Volunteer Assistance Corporation, 1989 Seminar Leader, Tune Management/Avoiding Burnout Lied Center for Performing Arts, Lawrence, Kansas, 1987-1989 Space/Design Consultant Downtown La Cross Business Association, 1984-1985 Year 2000 Plan Eastbank Artists, 1984 Retreat Leader, Organization/Board Development La Cross Tribune Readers' PaneL 1983-1984 Panelist and Advisor Wisconsin Arts Board, 1983-1987 Peer Panelist (also: budget testimony to House/Senate Budget Committee) General Public Speaking, 1975-Present Arts Administration, Oty Planning, Organizational Development (also: media relatioas and representation/tcstimony/lobbying to government agencies at city/stale/regionallcvels) 5'