HomeMy WebLinkAboutR07-Redevelopment Agency
/ftF".
"0
r"
o
0'
,
~
Cl'1'lr or SIN III!:RNAllDDO
"'&/Pfm ~""""'iL'~. ~
o
FraIl: RERIeDI J. ~
Executive Director
SUbject: PIB'.r JR1TTnnft
Date: J)A. _.1 -er 6, 1990
B)'''"P"'f. of PDPIiouII n.-f -.iaVOlIImc:d.l/OcIIttee k:ticD:
On August 6, 1990, the I'hml1"ity Devel..........Jt t'hmli"",icn, in closed sessicn, authorized
the pm::tlase of the Platt 8.1ildin;J.
On NoIIeDtler 20, 1990, the Redevel..........d. Qmaittee autharized the preparaticn of a Re-
quest for Pl.. V:-,.. (RFP) for the p1. servaticn am adaptive re-use of the Platt 8.1ild-
in;r.
On Dec:-.i.er 10, 1990, the matter regardi.n;J the Platt Rni1din;J was ocntinued to JaJ'lUaIy
7, 1990.
paw, _ft.."-! IIot:I.aDz
("..-_fty ~ 1. .L n.-.f_f....)
'DIAT mB IlB9BUJHIBR1' 1BPARDIBIfl' JIB ~.__h_. m __ mB _.LUlII a. QOaLII'IBD CXIf-
AllTII'QJ1'8 m 1'RBPARB A 1'D0I'n0ft''''l'lr 8'l'ODr Pfm mB 1lBlm:Ila!rICIr IIlD aDU'1'1VB Rl-UBB or mE
PLI/1"r JR1TTnnft.
.......m~, Bac:lUtiw Director
D8n1 ~ .-..t, DIpIIrtaIiIat
O:ntact E'el::SCfI:
Ken ~J.la1m ~
Hlc.ne:
5065: 5081
One (1)
Project Area:
CbIL.a.al Ci1:v North
Wlm1(s) :
SIn> ...Lin;r Data Attac.bed:
FtlNDDI; RQJIREHI!mS:
stc..ff Va oOll: Site Plan
J\nDmt: $ 15.000 (est.)
8.ldget Authority:
",..,.f -i.cm,lnrw~ 1 Notes:
~~J"~ '7i'
/~?/
,
t-
cS-:J lab:4159
.~ Ita 19D:
~_~*?"V"":"-'__ =..'~'
'0
6>
.....
'-1- .
6'
' KlH:GW:lab:4159
1 .
.1.
-
asu:::: ~rmcr
o
Plat:t: IIId ,..41...
'!be DeIIel"'t"'""'/l DePartment has ft<<:lqI1i""tld the 46,000 square foot Platt J!nildin;r al
the scut:heast ............. of Fifth an:i "E" SLL--=ts. '!he bnilding was r1i"'("r-ed at
the NcM!IItler 21, 1990 Redevel"'t"'""'/l o:mnittee DBet::iJJ) an:i staff was authorize:!
to retain Milford WIlyne Dcnaldsa1, an experienced historical uddtect, to
_illJt in the prepmrtia1 of a p.,q.-t for p.,. 'i":-O'" (RFP). '!be primary dJjec-
tive of the RFP ~. .:; 1oIaJl.d be to identify a developer capMle of restorin;J
the structure an:i mtmnin;J it to use in the Oi!ntral. llJsiness District. Mr.
Dc:naldsat is a......d.ly c:x:n3uctin.J the City's Historical. survey an:i has extensive
expmience in the renc:IYlltial an:i revitalizatial of historicallmlllS, such as the
9"''"'''''P qJ2II'ter in San Diego.
DeYel"'t"'""'Jt DepIrtment staff, together with Planning an:i ad.1ding services De-
pa..Luo../l staff, bIMl Et: with Mr. Dalal.dscn. It was Mr. Dcnaldsa1's c:pinial
that to issue a RFP 1d1id1 does not provide detailed inf0DBtial1llltUl.d result in
no qualified bict:Jers respcuUD1. D.1rin;J this DBet::iJJ), Mr. Dcnaldsa1 provided
infmmatial in .....II-..tica with the City of ClarEIIa1t's rece.il. experience in
disseminatin;J fi~ (500) RFP doct""""'lts in the absence of a feasibility
stu:ly an:i legislative decisials rel.at.inj to land use an:i City finarcla1
participatial. '!be City of Clal.duOa/l received ally five (5) respelIlSBS to its
RFP, three (3) of 1d1id1 8'll1ooaqoJel1t1y c:h.~ cut of the ilL" . Prior to
.......1irY:J a RFP, Mr. Dcnaldsa1 feels, an:i staff cxn:urs, that decisials JIIJSt be
JIIIde by the n-."1ity DeIIel"'t"'""'Jt I'hmli....ial, Mayar an:i (\.....11'\ Ch1nci1, am,Ior
Plamin;J I'hmli-im, as ~"i"-iate, mgardin;J land an:i adaptive re-use i""",_,
including pIIridJJ1 i__. Mditiallll.1y, decisicns rel.at.inj to the City's
financial per1:iclpatial an:i the devel"'t"'""'Jt of at least the entire mrtheJ:n half
of the block ~ by "E" , 5th, "D" an:i CbJrt SLL-ts JIIlSt be IIlIlde prepara-
tory to the devel"'t"'""'IL an:i iDpleaent:atia1 of a restoratial an:i adaptive re-use
plan.
Mr. Dalal.dscn's primary ClCllOe1.u is the theatre partial of the bni1din;J. He
feels that it is -- _IUal the Department be in a pcsitial to dElllc....LLate to
potential develc:pers that there is a demani for the J:elDYllted theatre, or to
Elpe('ify feasible altemative uses. 'lO a lesser dl:.p....., Mr. Dcnaldsa1 has the
- OCIlIC8tllS abcut the mt:ai1 an:i office porticns of the b1i1ding. It is
staff's c:pinial that i_1aJICIe of a RFP with the a........lt 1'1- of unIcrlcM1
elements 1IIItUl.d result in a failure to attract cpll.ified develc:pers. It walld be
'"I"tJL"i"-1ate to first prepare a feasibility study that analyzes the potential of
existin;J an:i altemative uses for the h'il<lliq.
staff has invited Mr. Dcnal.dscn to attelld the [loo. -...er 10, 1990 t'mm1l'li.ty neve-
l"'i'"""'/l l'hmli....ialllllet:in;J to adih. ~, as "M'L"i"-iate, i...._ and CXD:lenlS the
n-wm.i....i.al my have.
I I>eoJo ........,'0 -Vial of the fCltm JlDtial.
~~_..-
Dllntl.." -,L
~ --..:.....
JIIetlDq Date. 12/10/1990
~'~"'=""":
j
-
o
o
c5
..
.,. . .. . , ell'!." .'._
.... ''',.. .; ":1::' .,.....~-.'...,..., ~'.. ",
t'..... ':!".':~',....' :~~?~fl..' ...~.
"0' .. ..... ........,,~ o,! ..r~..ot.... ._ ......
. ... .....~':.. .. ",'. 1" ,..1.,~. ,-.. .......
,'0 . . :-~.'" ..... .. .
. I.,
.J'
::.. ..
'~
I
6\'
-"-,.
,
~ .r"#Tlr,
e
t5'T4 lID.!."",..}
,dN
o
~
.
H\
. .,
. I.
t
.
I I r ,.
.:.~l.~ J
. . . .
. . ..
,11 0-
, Q
'l r.
. .
.. , ~.
..1 ... . .
()I
, ,':.0
. r
,
... IS
t
I . Co',
L .~
- -,
.
",
.
, .1
'."JJ~
, " 1,
. .
.,... . t
I
..... "."-0 ~"'"" ..
..... I. ,....... I.'. .. '.. _.." ..
" .. ," .......... ... 'I" . ,'. I' "., ";
.. .... '0 ,_. ...... .. ....
','" ;.:
'.- ......
....
~,e~~"_"~- _.
o
NILRlID WIYNIIlONAUlION
A'CHITECT
.
-'0 FIFrI. '\~'lf. ~l:rrE 1,1,'
'SA:\. CUtC,'" '\Llf"tK'I.\ ":1",..
HISIORJC GASL.-.MP QUARrER
! TELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
I ........ _ID !II -.omo ..... to. ....../1..- 1st. "3 ffiP .
. i IAIII FAI TEL. JIJ~t/15
I
I
"
: .'.~
'11IIS '1'EIJXX)PI IS BIllIG SI!II'1' BY.
IAMI.
HWD FAI 110. (619) 234-6286
KWD PlOJICr JIJ..2.o~n
IlIIBD OF PACES LJ:) IICLUDIIC SHEET
D AI! SQP!IG YOU ~ ~I.JJJ t. _.
IF tou 110 JOT UCEm ALL PAGIS, PLEASE CALL AS SOON AS JIOSSIBLI, 'DIE
ItIGlEI IS (619) 239-7
OPElATCa OMB.
CFor'PP!aWI
CForJ'llUl'_
~nq......
C .... .... .... IOIIItMIIt
C I'OR lIDS our
ItIMARICS
D AppIV.1d . IlIbmItttcI
D App!Wld II IIIItId
D RIlurnId far corrlCtlo.lI
D
C RtlUllmlt ...... for IIIPIOVII
D lullmlt___ for lIltrIIlulIon
D Rltum_COfNCtId JIrIntI
1.
D PRINTS RETURNED AnER LOAN TO US
COPr TO
IlGNED: .
l'tlf.PJk"=l ~I~.Z"'._
FAC~IMIU ~1"'Z""&llo
~"'.~=o._'''~.,_:
. .
'0
0"
c5
6)
o
o
o
TASK SCHEDULE
PLATT BUILDING
car Of 8M BerM'dlno
DecImbtr I, 1110
A.
:~~~~EL~ COMuITTEE FOR AGENCY ARCf.IITECTlIAAI CONSULTANT AND
PROJECT DEVElOPER _ _
1. City ~. ChImbIr of Commtrce and EoonomIc DM/opment CommIttee
IICOIIlmIIlcl membelllo Red"'eIopn*1t Aoenc, 8oInt.
2. RedlWlopment Agency 808I'Cf IppOlnll Board member Md IIIIIceI OIlIer RevIew
Commlttte 1ppO/ntmenta. .
3. RevIew CornmIIIIe meel810 cII8cuss lite markellng Itrateot IIId RFP for f'.lIlbIIIty Study.
8.
:~::~:. ~ FOR FEAS'SlLlTVsruDYFOR ECON()UIC DEVELOPMENT OF
THE SITE ANn PLATT SUILDlNq
1. PrepIrdon of RFP.
2. AdYtrUeement period.
3. Submlalon of propoelll by ConsuI1ants.
4. Staff lWl/Iew of propoe....
5. RevIew Committee reviews propoeals.
e. RevIew CommIttee "*'lIIews proponenll and reoommenda ConeuItInt 10 Agency.
7. Agency I8IICII Feasibility Consultant
C. FEASIBILITV sruDX
1.
ConeuIIInt ooncIucIIlIId compI.... FlISIlInty Study.
Staff rlVlewa IFld rtCllIInII18nd8 F-*nty Study for review.
RevIew CommIttae revIewIand aoctpll FellllUlty Study.
2-
3.
__~"'M~~-:-,..-
.
'0
o'
0-
CJ
o
o
0-
TASK SCHEouI.E
PLATT 8UILDtNO
Decemb..r 5. ,_
Page 2
C. fEASIBILITY snJD'( (ConUnued)
4. Agency dlIlrIlu.. F"'b111ty ReporIIO CIty CommIuIona. ChImber of Commerce.
economic DevelGpmenI Comrnlltee for review Md OOIMlInL
5. Staff prlJplr8llUnunay report on the FeaslblllIy Study wIIh IIClOIIlIIlend. for Requeel
for CuaJmcauoIll for a 0eveI0per with gUidelines for deve/opmenI of lie tilt.
8. 8!aIr 1'ICOIllInendal.... rotwarded to CIty.CouncIIIor review.
7. CIty CouncIl IICCIf>Ilt Starr AICCllMlendaIJo IIld d1recll Starr 10 pl'lJ)lre RFQ -for
. d.'IIapmenI of ,lie aile.
e. CIIy CouncIII'IYIewI 8/1d 1ICC8p1ll pI'OpOIaI for ~ hillOrlcll elgnlflclnce"Of lie "
PIalI8W1dIng.
D.
DeTERMINATlON OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PlATT BUIlDINtlI
1. Staff pI1pIreI8/1d IUbmIll AdverIIeemenI for Study 8/1d prepntJon of nomination of Itle
PIa1l Bullcl'ng .. a h/sIoIJcaI resource.
2. Review of AdverIIHrnent by ~ CommJlleellld InIereIted par1/IIe.g. San BernardIno
HiItotIcaJ SocIeI,.
3. RevIew of IUbrnIlllon 8/1d IIfllCllon of ConauIIlInL
<t. Colllulllnt COmpl_1Iudy and delermlnes e/IgIbIIIty.
S. ConeuIIInt determines COrnplJance with JlI'OIlO8ed H111or1c1J SIteI 0rdInIn0e.
8 Staff reviews study 8/1d deIet mines If an EIR report II required under tile C8IIfomJa
EnvIronmenIal Quality Act, SecIlon '06 (If Federal funcla .,.10 be used) Md Olher IocIJ
lIIlVInlnmenIaJ prollCllon ordinances.
7. 8tafI'a recommendallolll are forwarded 10 CIIy CouncIJ for revfew.
e. CIty CouncIl l'IVIewa IIld IICCepIa SIaff'a recommenda1lon and dIrecIa 8Iaff 10 Include
Informauon In !he RFQ for !he development of the tilt.
E. REQUEST FOR QUAI 'FICA TIONS _ DEVElOP~ij
1.
2.
PrIpIrdon IIld IUbmJesIOn of draft RFQ to StaIr for NVIew.
Pr8pIraIIon of Advettisement.
~~~~""~~~"
. "0
o
o
o
o
TASK SCHEDULE
PLATT BUlLDING
DIoehh S. tHO
PIIgU
E. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS - DEVElOPER (ContInued)
3. SIafII'IVIew of draft RFQ.
4. Redl"ielopnl8o'll Agency SUbcommlllee (Review Commllt88) I'IVIew of draft RFQ,
S. ' CCOIIOIllIc DMIopment CommIIIee NVIew of draft RFQ.
e. Ch8mberIMerchant AI8ocIIIIon review 01 draft RFQ.
7. FIn8I draft RFQ ClI)qlI8I8cl.
8. BIde and !II*' ~ prlnllllg prepered, 1IeU8d and bid 8W8Id1d.
I. AedeveIopment Agency IIIlPtUVII of RFQ.
10. PtInIIno of RFQ.
11. AdverIIsement period.
6 12. InIonnatIonal MeelIng/DIIblnement of Form ellClullve Negot/don AgreemenL
13. Developer IUbmIItll period.
t4. SIafII'IVIew of prllpOIlI8 and ptlIpIrlllon of matrix IIlcllUmllllly or P'!POIIII.
16. RevIew of proposals by Commlllee.
fe. ,PrePntIOn of IpprOprIalelnl8rvl8W qUlllIona for CommIaee.
t7. CommIttee InterYlews I8I1ll-ftnaIJsts IIlcl t8COIllIIl8IldIlNIIelI to Redevelopment AQent:y
Board.
18. R8dlVllapment Agency r8VIew8 proposals of InIlI8ll.
fl. Agency Study Session wI1h finalists.
20. Agency '''ICI/on of Developer.
F. SITE ClFARA~
t.
InIhI SludylNegallve DecIaraIIon 1ppfOYId.
ReIoe8IIon of ExIItIng BuIInesstI.
BIdlIIId IIP8CI fDr lOIIIIenvIronmentll -...nent fDr peroeI.
^,':\,.
vJ'
2-
3.
,.
\
:0
r-'
o
6-'
6)
.., ... ..
..-.,.,. -, .
o
o
.)
TASK SCHEDULE
. PLATT BUI.DING
December I, 1_
PIge 4
F. SITE ClEARANCE (ContInued)
4. AwMl of'bId for IOIl11env1ronmenl8l ....1III1Ilt for PIfCII.
I. BIdI and,,*, for ctemoIllIon of buildings ptpar'" andluueel; propoelll reviewed by
8111f.
e. AWlI'd of bid for dInioIItIon of. buildings.
,
G. DEVELOPER NEGOTIATIONS. PlAN PREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION PERIOD .
1. Prtpll'l1IOn I/ld prtHl'llI1IOn of Ed_lYe NegoIIIlIon AQrIImInI.
2. ~n of Deve/opment Agreemenl for IWIIIIltI/IOn to AgencyiClly
CouncI. '. . . .
3.
Preplrltlon of RIIOIutlonI, and 8IIlf Reporl8.
Advertise NlIIc HearIng.
CIty CounciIIAgency HearIng.
Agency and Developer open Escrow.
4.
5.
8.
7. ArcIlI1eclurll CommIeIton MIecIIon of Archlteclurll Subcommittee to revIIw cIMIopment
pin.
eo PreparatIon and Iubmlllton 01 Design Conc:eptn ConIIructIon DrawInge.
to ArcIlItecturIl SUbCommltlee r8VIewe deve/opmIIlt plIne.
100 Comrnllllon IIlCl CIty Council cleve/opment pIIn IIJPrOVII proc... compllled.
11. Deve/opeI ftRlnClng COIIlIIlllmen1811CUr8C111llPfOVed by Agency.
12. BuIIcIng permIl8l1CUr8C1.
13. &crow cIoIed.
14. Commencement of conetrucIIon.
15. Agency COIll1rUcl8 oll-IlIe ~ 10 IIIV8 pnlfIct.
1 e. Agency COIll1nlcl8 PIrkIng S1rucIure wllIl cooperltlon from Developer.
17. Co"",etIon of construclIon.