Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout31-Water Department l . C11~ SAN BERNARDINO - REQUE~ FOR COUNCIL ACTON From: Bernard C. Kersey, Secretary Subject: AMENDMENTS TO WATER DEPARTMENT RULES AND REGULATIONS NOS. 5 AND 20 Dept: Board of Water Commissioners Date: December 27, 1990 Synopsis of Previous Council action: 11/01/89 -- Mayor and Common Council approved increases in Acquisition of Service Charges established by the Board of Water Commissioners by means of Resolution No. 89-419. 12/18/90 -- Public Hearing held to receive comments. on the proposed increases; no comments or protests received. Recommended motion: Adopt Resolution S ignatu re Contact person: Bernard C. Kersey Phone: 384-5091 Supporting data attached: Yes Ward: All FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.! IAcct. DescriPtion) Finance: Council Notes: 75-0262 Agenda Item No 3/ . CIT~F SAN BERNARDltO - REQUEO FOR COUNCIL ACTON STAFF REPORT The Board of Water Commissioners has adopted Resolution No. 412 increasing the acquisition of service charges (Water Department Rule 20) applicable to all new water service applications, and Resolution No. 413 increasing the water meter installation costs (Water Department Rule 5). The Water Department has an established acquisition of service charge of $1400 for a 5/8" X 3/4" meter serving a single dwelling unit. Multiple dwelling units are charged one-half of the base charge for each unit. Charges for other classes of service are established based upon meter size. Revenue from this charge is used to pay the cost of serving new development. Analyses have been performed which indicate that this charge is not sufficient to cover the incremental additional charge of providing for expansion to serve new growth. Required capital improvements to meet future demand were derived from the 1990 Water System Master Plan Update. A total 5-year capital improvement project cost was determined based on 1990 dollars. The total cost of all projects are $67.5 million (a copy of the schedule is attached to the Board resolution). The projects were then allocated as projects necessary for existing customers, and projects necessary to expand the water system to, meet new demand. All of the 5-year capital improvement projects are bond- sale financed. An analysis was conducted to determine historical rates of growth and anticipated growth rates for the next five years. This analysis shows that we have added approximately 1,000 equivalent residential units per year to the water system since 1980. ' The results of the analysis indicate that the acquisition of service charge should be established at $2700 for 5/8" X 3/4" meter serving a single dwelling unit. The charge for larger meters is then established based upon a capacity factor for each meter size in relationship to the capacity factor of the 5/8" X 3/4" meter size. The increased acquisition of service charge is a result of the Department's updated master plan of water system improvements. This master plan update is a requirement of the City's General Plan. A survey of surrounding area water agencies was conducted to determine what costs they have established for acquisition of service and meter installation charges. A copy of the survey information is attached. The results indicated that the increased charges, approved by the Board of Water Commissioners, are mid- range and in line with surrounding water agencies. 75-0264 - -- - . CITPOF SAN BERNARDltO - REQUEO FOR COUNCIL ACTON STAFF REPORT Additional changes were made to Water Department Rule No. 20 which breaks down the cost of water mains installed by the Water Department by various main sizes. The rule was also amended to approve engineering plan check fees, engineering evaluation fees, and allows for developers to install and dedicate main installa- tions. A complete analysis of changes to Rule and Regulation No. 20 is attached. Costs to install domestic water meters and fire services set forth in Rule and Regulation No.5 were increased for the 1-1/2", 2", and 3" services due to the cost of materials and labor to install the services. Large services, from 4" and up, and all fire services will be done on a cost plus 10% basis, whereby the applicant posts a deposit and will be reimbursed or charged based upon the actual cost to install. The Board of Water Commissioners conducted a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed increases and amendments on December 18, 1990, and no comments or protests were received. The Board adopted Resolutions No. 412 and 413 to become effective February 1, 1991. .,.,,_n""4 ..l - "0 0 0 0 .~ C COHPARISOI OF ACQUISITION/SERVICE CONNECT lOR FEES SIZE OF WEST S.B. CITY OF SERVICE RIVERSIDE YUCAIPA C.W.D. RIALTO S.B. 5/8" $ 1,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,650 $ $ 2,700 3/4" 1,500 2,500 2,650 2,969 4,050 1" 3,380 5,000 4,505 4,750 5,400 1-1/2" 6,380 10,000 9,275 9,797 13,500 2" 9,600 16,000 17,755 15,735 24,300 3" 16,880 32,500 39,750 34,400 35,100 4" 26,250 55,000 71,550 59,380 48,600 6" 48,750 112,500 159,000 135,980 * 8" 72,000 * 238,500 234,847 * 10" * * * * * C. . - 12" * * * * * *To be determined depending upon production capacity, storage, and transmission available in the pressure zone where service is being requested. ~ l I " () . C I '1' Y 09 S ARB E RQ A R D MORICIPAL WATER DEPAR'l'MENT IR'l'EROFFICE MEMORARDUM I R 0 o PROPOSED REVISION OF WATER DEPAR'l'MENT RULE AND REGULATION NO. 20 We have revised the Water Department's Rule and Regulation No. 20 (Application for Main Extension) as follows: 1. New Reauests for Service - Existing Section (a) Proposed Section (a) No Change. 2. Plan Check Fee - ADoroval or Dis8DDroval of Reauest For Main Extension - Existing Section (b) Proposed Section (b) The current Rule and Regulation No. 20 has a provision for approval of requests. We are proposing that all requests for main extension pay a plan check fee of $500.00 or $.25 per lineal foot whichever is greater to cover our engineering cost to design and plan check the proposed main installation. 3. Main Line Installed IBv Water DeDartmentl- Existing Section (c) Proposed Section (b) (1) Based on an analysis of construction orders closed out during the past 18 months, we recommend that the current 'per lineal foot cost to install water mains be increased as follows: FROM: 6" - 12" Larger Than 12" $20.15 Per Lineal Foot Time and Material + Adsorption Charges TO: 4" 6" 8" 12" Larger Than 12" $14.00 Per Lineal Foot $16.00 Per Lineal Foot $22.00 Per Lineal Foot $32.00 Per Lineal Foot Time and Material + Adsorption Charges 4. Main Line Installation (~v DeveloDer/Contractorl - Proposed Section (b) (2) The current Rule and Regulation No. 20 does not have a provision for developer/contractor-installed water mains. We have included this provision to enable the Department to balance our workload by requiring the developer, when determined necessary, to install water mains within dedicated public right of ways under our inspection using only materials approved by the Water Department. The developer/contractor installing water mains will use only a licensed contractor approved by the Water Department and shall be required to enter into a standard legal agreement which shall cover exact terms, legal conditions, and developer Icontractor respon- sibilities prior to approval to proceed. .c 0 5. Main Line construc~n Facilities Installed Section (b) (3) InsD8~tion ~posit for Mains bv Develooer/Contractor and Water Proposed o The current Rule and Regulation No. 20 does not have this provlslon. The Water Department shall require an inspection deposit of $350.00 or $1.00 per lineal foot of pipeline whichever is greater for all main line approved by the Department for installation by developer/contractor. The actual construction inspection may be conducted by Water Department engineering personnel and/or through contract inspection with a local engineering firm. The cost of inspection will vary depending upon the complexity of the installation and/or the competence of the pipeline contractor, and shall be billed or refunded for the actual cost plus 10%. 6. Extraordinarv Facilitv Charae - Existing Section (b) (1) Proposed Section (b) (4) The current Rule and Regulation No. 20 has a provision for extraordinary facility charges; however, it is too broad in scope and tried to cover more than it was intended to, i.e., costs of new reservoirs, wells, etc.. We have eliminated additional facilities from this rule and limited the language to cover only extraordinary construction costs incurred in main line installations. 7. Enaineerina Evaluation Fee - Proposed Section (b) (5) The current Rule and Regulation No. 20 does not have this provision. The Water Department shall require a water facility engineering evaluation fee deposit of $1,000.00 for request for service in new service areas and/or request for service that may require the installation of new reservoirs, boosters, transmission mains, and wells. The Department or its consulting engineer will perform the required engineering analysis to determine exactly what facilities are required to comply to the Department' s water system master plan. The Department will refund or bill the developer/contractor the actual engineering costs plus 10%. 8. Footage Charae for Service from Water Denartment Financed Main Extensions - Existing Section (e) Proposed Section (b) (6) No change. 9. Main Line Extension Aareement - Existing Section (d) Proposed Section (c) The current Rule and Regulation No. 20 has this provision; however, we have added the following subsection: In no instance shall the applicant be reim- bursed for more than the amount applicable in Section (b) (1) cost of main line installation bv Water Deoartment of this Rule and Regulation in effect at the time of installation for the reimbursable portion of the main extension. "0' We have added thisC(ubsection to ~arifY that reimbursement () for either Water Department or developer/contractor-installed water mains shall be based on the Water Department cost to install mains in effect at the time of installation. 10. Dead-End Lines - Existing Section (f) Proposed Section (d) No Change. 11. Corner Parcels - Existing Section (g) Proposed Section (e) No Change. 12. Acauisition of Service Charae - Existing Section (h) Proposed Section (f) The current acquisition of service charge in effect in Rule and Regulation No. 20 has been increased as follows: METER SIZE CURRENT CHARGE 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" x 3/4" 1" 1-1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" $ 1,400.00 1,400.00 1,400.00 5,650.00 8,480.00 14,130.00 19,700.00 45,770.00 To Be Determined To Be Determined PROPOSED CHARGE $ 2,700.00 4,050.00 5,400.00 13,500.00 24,300.00 35,100.00 48,600.00 To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined The acquisition of service charge for the base domestic meter (5/8" X 3/4" 20 gpm maximum capacity) was established at $2,700.00 in the Bartle Wells City of San Bernardino Water Department Capital Improvement Financing Plan completed in November, 1990. The acquisition of service charge for the larger size meters is based on their maximum flow capacity, divided by 20 gpm, times the based domestic meter cost of $2,700.00. The attached survey of acquisi- tion of service charges indicates that our proposed costs are in line with what the surrounding communities are charging. , .~. "0 o o o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO RULE AND REGULATION NO. 20 AND 5, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS, INCLUDING INCREASES TO THE ACQUISITION OF SERVICE CHARGE AND NEW SERVICE INSTALLATION CHARGES. WHEREAS, Article IX, Section 163 of the City Charter, in part, empowers the Board of Water Commissioners to establish all water rates, collect all rentals from water bearing lands and generally 11 regulate, control, manage, renew, repair and extend the entire 12 water system of the City; and 13 WHEREAS, Acquisition of Service Charges and New Service 14 Installation Charges for all new water services, and charges and 15 procedures for Main Line Installations are set forth in the rules 16 and regulations of the Board of Water Commissioners; and 17 18 No.5 for New Service Installation Charges, and Rule and Regulation 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the current charges set forth in Rule 'and Regulation No. 20, for Main Line Installations and Acquisition of Service Charges are not sufficient to cover the costs to install services and mains, and the costs to finance sources of supply, storage, transmission, treatment, conservation and distribution facilities of the water system; and WHEREAS, studies have been conducted and increases in the New Service Installation Charge, Acquisition of Service Charge, and Main Line Installation Charge have been prepared, and a Public Hearing was held by the Board of Water Commissioners to receive comments from the public on proposed charges on December 18, 1990, 12/27/90 .' 0 o o o 1 and no comments or protests w~re received; and 2 WHEREAS, the Board of Water Commissioners adopted Resolution 3 No. 412 on December 18, 1990, approving amendments to Rule and 4 Regulation No. 20, increasing and modifying Main Line Installation 5 Charges, Plan Check Charges, providing for developer-installed and 6 dedicated mains, and increasing the Acquisition of Service Charge, 7 to become effective February 1, 1991; and 8 WHEREAS, the Board of Water Commissioners adopted Resolution 9 No. 413 on December 18, 1990, approving amendments to Rule and 10 Regulation No.5, increasing the New Service Installation Charges 11 of 1-1/2 inch, 2 inch, and 3 inch domestic water meters, and 12 requiring a deposit for all domestic services larger than 3 inches, 13 and for all fire services, to become effective February 1, 1991. 14 WHEREAS, Main Line Installation Charges, Acquisition of 15 Service Charges, New Service Installation Charges, and rules and 16 regulations established by the Board of Water Commissioners, 17 pursuant to Charter Section 163, may be approved by resolution of 18 the Mayor and Common Council pursuant to Chapter 2.28, Subsection 19 4, of the Municipal Code. 20 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL 21 OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 22 SECTION ONE: That the City of San Bernardino hereby approves 23 increases and amendments to the Main Line Installation Charges and 24 procedures, and an increase in rates for Acquisition of Service 25 Charges for all new water service applications established by 26 Resolution No. 412 of the Board of Water Commissioners, a copy of 27 which is attached hereto, marked "Exhibit 1" and is hereby referred 28 to and made a part hereof as fully as though set forth at length 12/27/90 -2- "0 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS AND INCREASES TO RULE AND REGULATION NOS. 5 AND 20 OF THE BOARD OeATER COMMISSIONO 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 herein. SECTION TWO: That the City of San Bernardino hereby approves increases to the New Service Installation Charges for all new water service applications established by Resolution No. 413 of the Board of Water Commissioners, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked "Exhibit 2" and is hereby referred to and made a part hereof as fully as though set forth at length herein. SECTION THREE: That the charges and amendments approved herein shall become effective February 1, 1991. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 11 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 12 Bernardino at a 13 on the meeting thereof, held day of , 19_, by the 14 following vote to wit: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Council Members: AIIB. ~ ABSTAIN ESTRADA REILLY FLORES HAUDSLEY MINOR POPE-LUDLAM MILLER CITY CLERK / / / / / / / / / / / / 12/27{90 -3- "0' RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS AND INCREASES TO RULE AND REGULATION NOS. S AND 20 OF THE BOARD ~ATER COMMISSIO~. c:> 1 2 3 of 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day , 19_ W.R. HOLCOMB, MAYOR City of San Bernardino APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT: JAMES F. PENMAN City Attorney By: ( - ,,~~? i't//;"",...... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12/27/90 -4- . "0' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 o o o RESOLUTION NO. J1l A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AMENDING RULE AND REGULATION NO. 20 TO INCREASE THE ACQUISITION OF SERVICE CHARGE, ADD A PLAN CHECK FEE, CHANGE THE COSTS FOR HAINS INSTALLED BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT, ADD AN ENGINEERING EVALUATION FEE, ADD A PROVISION TO ALLOW DEVELOPERS TO INSTALL WATER HAINS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS, AND AN INSPECTION FEE FOR HAINS INSTALLED BY DEVELOPERS FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE SERVICE AREA OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, Article IX, Section 163 of the City Charter, in part, empowers the Board of Water Commissioners to establish all water rates; and WHEREAS, these charges are set forth in the rules and regulations of said Board of Water Commissioners, and it is the duty of the Mayor and Common Council to pass ordinances as may be necessary to enforce saia rules; and WHEREAS, the current rates set forth in Rule and Regulation No. 20 are not sufficient to cover the costs to expand, improve and upgrade the water system; and WHEREAS, a proposed revision of Rule and Regulation No. 20 has been prepared and a public hearing was held to receive comments from the public on the proposed revisions on December 18, 1990, and no comments or protests were received; and WHEREAS, a Water System Master Plan and a financial analysis were conducted to evaluate the impacts of current water usage and contemplated future development on the Water Department's existing facilities in the entire service area, along with an analysis of new, improved or expanded pUblic facilities and improvements required or appropriate to serve new development, and said studies set forth the relationship between new development, those services or facilities, and the estimated costs of those improvements. The "C'VUT'DT", 11111 "Q 1 2 3 . 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t( 15 16 17 18 19 I 20 I I 21 I 22 I I i 23 I I 24 , I , I I 25 I I i 26 I 27 , 28 L o o o studies are entitled the "Water System Master Plan Update, September 1990", Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and "City of San Bernardino Sewer and Water Financing Plan", Exhibit "B" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, these studies were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing and notice was given in compliance with Government Code Section 54992; and WHEREAS, a public hearing, noticed pursuant to and in compliance with Government Code Sections 54944.1 and 6062a, was held at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Water Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Board of Water Commissioners finds as follows: A.) The purpose of'Rule and Regulation No; 20 is to finance source of supply, storage, transmission, treatment, conservation and distribution facilities to reduce the impacts upon the capacities and capabilities of existing facilities through increased demand caused by new development, within the entire service area of the San Bernardino Municipal Water Department as it exists in 1990. B.) The acquisition of service charges collected by Rule and Regulation No. 20 pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance the pUblic water facilities described or identified in Exhibits "A" and liB" attached hereto. C.) After considering the study analyses prepared and listed hereinabove, and the testimony received at this public hearing, the Board approved said studies and incorporates such herein, and further finds that the new development in the service area will create additional needs of sources of supply, reservoirs, transmis- "0 o o o 1 sion and distribution system upgrades and improvements, water 2 treatment facilities and conservation facilities within the 3 impacted area as described in the map attached hereto on Exhibit 4 "e", and will contribute to the degradation of water system 5 facilities in that area. 6 D.) It is appropriate or necessary in this described impact 7 area to provide for sources of supply, storage, transmission and 8 distribution systems, water treatment and conservation facilities 9 which have not been constructed or have been constructed, but new 10 development has not contributed its fair share towards the cost of 11 these new facilities. 12 E.) The facts and evidence presented establish that there is 13 a reasonable relationship between the need for the described pUblic 14 facilities and the impacts of the types of development described 15 in Section 2 below for which the corresponding fee is charged, and 16 there is a reasonable relationship between the fees use and the 17 type of development for which the fee is charged, as these 18 reasonable relationships or nexus are in more detail described in 19 the study referenced above. 20 F.) The cost estimates set forth in Exhibits "A" and "B" are 21 reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and 22 the fees expected to be generated by new development will not 23 exceed the total of these costs. 24 NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Water Commissioners, City of San 25 Bernardino, does hereby resolve as follows: 26 SECTION 1. 27 A revised Rule and Regulation No. 20 as set forth in Exhibit "D" 28 attached hereto, incorporated herein by reference as though set "0' 1 2 S 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 o o o forth at length herein is hereby approved. All charges shall be paid prior to any water service connection, and shall be in addition to all other charges imposed by the Water Department (fire service excluded). SECTION 2. The fees collected through Rule and Regulation No. 20 shall be used to pay for the described public facilities to be constructed by the Water Department and for reimbursing the ~ater Department for the development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the Water Department. SECTION 3. Any judicial action or proceed to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days. SECTION 4. This resolution shall become effective on February 1, 1991. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1RTh day of December , 1990, by the following vote to-wit: AYES: Commissioners Chandler, Willis, Urata, Bivens & Garcia NAYS: None ABSENT: None e ERNARD C. KERSEY, & Ex-Officio Secre eputy City Clerk ary " "0' -. . ,.. ,- f : l. l l. r .. CbHIBIT "A" 0 o Water System Master Plan Update for the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water .Department September 1990 ....~ . - -. - ...... '. 'b~~ B~li ... , ~ . 4- ,0 ~~"" ~..,~ . ~", .~ ~: .~ Z '0 0 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. " . t "0' , I r I r I, r I r r r r l f. I [ [ L [: [ U o o o Water System Master Plan Update for the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department . September 1990 Prepared by Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Ontario and Walnut Creek California "cr , I- r- r. I. [ [ F r~ r- r. t. r . L r [ [ [ L [ o o o EllECI1l'IVE StIlMMY The City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (City) has provided reliable and cost-effective water service to its customers for many years. In 1981, a water system master plan was prepared to identify necessary water system improvements for the City's service area. A continued rapid growth in the number of the City's customers, combined with expansion of the City's service area and significant changes in available ~ter supply, have made it necessary to prepare this update to the 1981 Water System Master Plan. This update looks at a planning horizon to year 2010. SERVICE AIlFA The service area of the San Bernardino Municipal Water Department is bounded on the north by the san Bernardino National Forest, and on the east by the East valley Water District, Norton Air Force Base, Victoria Farms Mutual Water Company, and the South San Bernardino County Water District. It is bounded on the south by the cities of Lama Linda and Colton and on the west by the West San Bernardino County Water District, the City of Rialto, and the Muscoy Mutual Water Company. The service area of approximately 45 square miles is divided into 18 pressure zones, which range in ground elevation from approximately 1,000 to 2,500 feet. For this study, new pressure zone boundaries were defined for the 2100, 2300, and 2500 zones in the rapidly developing upper northwest portion of the service area. WATER DEMl\NDS The Municipal Water Department has many years of record of water production and water use. However, because of limited information regarding time and place of water use, representative unit water use factors by land use category were used in order to allocate the demands geographically throughout the pressure zones. In addition, the unit water use factors were used wi th future land use information to estimate and allocate future demands. The water demands were determined for each pressure zone as a whole; and were then distributed throughout each zone. The total existing E-l CAMP DRESSER & McKEE lNC " i ~ I L r r . ! r [" r r I I L L: L E L r . > o o o maxillRllD day demand in 1989-90 was approximately 61,000 gallons per minute (gpm); while the projected future maximum day demand in year 2010 was estimated to be approximately 93,000 gpm. WATER SUPPLY 'I1le City currently obtains most of its water from groundwater wells. A small amount of surface water (approximately 800 gpm) is currently treated at the Devil Canyon Filter Plant and used in the 1720 Zone. No State Water Project (SWP) water has ever been used directly by the City. However, in recent years the spreading of SWP water has placed some water into the groundwater basin, and undoubtedly a small portion of the groundwater pumped by the City is SWP water. 'I1le City is currently having to rely on its existing storage capacity and supplemental imported SWP water through the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, in order to meet the existing maximum day demands. During the summer, the northwest portion of the service area can marginally meet existing maximum day demand, and does not have sufficient production capacity to meet future maximum day demand. 'I1le Upper Zone has major problems for existing and future conditions due to production restrictions on wells with trace pollutants. 'I1le Lower Zone region has some excess production capacity under existing conditions; however, present production levels cannot meet the projected future demand. 'I1le total future shortfall in well production capacity in year 2010 is anticipated to be approximately 53.0 mgd for the entire system. Several water supply alternatives were developed to meet the City'S illl1ll!diate and long-term needs, including: new wells; wellhead treatment to remove trace organic compounds from affected wells; and surface water fran the proposed Devil canyon Treatment Plant. A cCllllbination of the alternatives was determined to be the most feasible due to the City's illl1ll!diate needs, the large projected shortfall, and the need to maintain a reliable water supply. E-2 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC . r --. . .' C? . I I r.- ! . , rt , . o o o EXISTD<<; WATER SYSTE2t FACILITIES 'l1le majority of the system's water is supplied from wells. While some of these wells pump water directly into the distribution system, most wells are part of a complex (referred to as plants) that consist of one or more wells that supply water to a ground level tank. Separate high efficiency booster pumps draw water from the ground level tank and pump it into the distribution system. Gravity storage is provided for every pressure zone. 'l1le City currently has 24 water storage reservoirs in operation (89 million gallons of storage capacity) and 2 reservoirs under design (6.5 million gallons of storage capacity). All the reservoirs are at ground level. Some reservoirs are of reinforced concrete construction, while the remainder are steel tanks. Most of the City's booster pumps draw water from the well complex tanks and pump it throughout the distribution system into the storage reservoirs. Other booster pumps are independent of the well plants, and are located in the distribution system itself. 'l1leyare used to lift water from a low pressure zone to a higher pressure zone, and pump directly from a pipeline or storage reservoir. During the SUIIIIIl!r, water is transferred from the lower zones to the higher elevation zones by means of booster pumps since adequate water supply is not available in the higher zones. During winter, months, water in excess of the local demand may be available in the high elevation zones and is transferred to lower zones by means of pressure reducing valves, which are kept closed during the SUIIIIIl!r except under emergency conditions. 'l1le City's transmission and distribution pipelines vary in diameter frc. 30 inches down to 4 inches. The backbone pipelines of the existing system generally run north-south in the vicinity of Waterman Avenue and Highway 215, and east-west in the vicinity of Baseline Street. E-3 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE 'NC .' 0 r' . I" f.' . ' . [ f' f I If' I L [ L r: l L o o o MATER SYSTEJt ANlU.YSIS The water system analysis was performed with the assistance of a computer simulation model for each pressure zone and for the system as a whole under existing and future conditions. The computer model used for this purpose was the Water Distribution Network Analysis Program developed by the University of Kentucky (the Kentucky Model). Generally, pipes 8 inches and larger in dillllleter were included in the pressure zone models, along with some smaller pipes where necessary for a realistic representation of the actual flow pattern in the water system. A planning level model was developed of the major water system facilities in order to evaluate interzone water transfers. The model included only sources, reservoirs, major transmission pipes, major booster pumps, and major pressure reducing stations. The model was used to investigate the adequacy of existing and/or proposed main transmission facilities to convey water throughout the system, particularly from the lower elevation zones to the higher elevation zones. The major overall system deficiencies were found to be the inadequacy of the existing pumping capability and transmission mains to move water from the lower elevation zones to the higher elevation zones. Most of the existing well production is in the Lower Zone, while I\I)st future development is in the 1720 and higher zones. Also, several of the Upper Zone's existing production wells may exceed the action levels of some regulated organic pollutants in the near future. Based on the identified deficiencies, an overall system alternative was defined for the City's water system, which consists of the following major new facili ties: A new Lower Zone reservoir in the vicinity of the intersection of Freeway 215 and Highway 30. A new pump station (1900 HP ultimate capacity) at the new Lower Zone reservoir site to convey water to the Upper Zone. New 36-inch transmission main along Kt. Vernon Avenue to the new Lower Zone reservoir site. E-4 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE ONe I", ~~-- ! I r I I L [ f- I- r: r' l I I [' L [ [ L L r o o oj I i New 36-inch transmission main to convey water north-south from Lower Zone to Devil Canyon Treatment Plan. New 36-inch transmission main to convey water east-west across the City system in the vicinity of Baseline Street in the Lowe r Zone. A new Upper Zone reservoir (8.0 million gallons Electric Drive Reservoir replacement) on the southwest side of the Shandin Hills. A new booster pump station (1500 HP) at the new Upper Zone reservoir site to pump water to the 1720 and higher elevation zones. Booster station improvements (400 HP) at Newmark to pump to Sycamore Zone. Several new wells (new wells located throughout the system). Wellhead treatment facilities at the E Street, 27th Street and 19th Street plants. The storage requirements for the water system were evaluated separately for each pressure zone, and included operational, emergency, and fire storage components. The overall available existing storage is generally adequate for the system as a whole under existing conditions. However, there are widespread discrepancies between required and available storage within the individual pressure zones. In addition, there will be a significant need for additional storage capacity in the future. Approximately 45.0 million gallons of additional storage capacity will be needed throughOUt the system by year 2010. The analysis of the booster pumping capability of the City's system considered the two major functions of the booster pumps: to lift water fran the well(s) to the reservoir(s) within a pressure zone; and to boost water fran lower elevation to higher elevation zones. The booster pumping requirements were determined as the capacity needed .to meet the maxi_ day demand for the zone plus the maximum day demand for water transferred fran that zone to higher elevation zones; and to replenish fire storage within eight hours. Existing pumping capacities are adequate for existing conditions; however, substantial increases in pumping capability are needed under future conditions to lift water to higher elevation zones. E-5 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC ~. - .lh. 1 - - . '" 0 . 0 0 '.' '. .- . (~. I' I f. I r I' i. r . r . L L L i I L I I [:. I I L I I !: I o The City's network of transmission .and distribution piping was evaluated to ensure that the water system would be capable of providing adequate pressure and flow throughout the City during periods of fire flow with consumption at maximum day demand. Piping deficiencies within each pressure zone and for the system as a whole were identified; and required pipeline improvements were determined. alSTS AND ST1oGD<<; OF JlECCIoIMnmED IMPRO\ImIIEm'S The water system plan includes construction cost estimates and a program for staging construction of the recoJlUllended water system improvements to correct existing deficiencies and to provide orderly expansion of the water system to meet future demands. A detailed Capital Improvement program (CIP) was developed for the major supply, storage, pumping and transmission main improvements needed for the City's overall system during the 1991 to 1995 timeframe. Costs and staging were also developed for the required storage, pumping, and pipeline improvements for each pressure zone at five (5) year increments between 1995 and year 2010. A cost summary of the proposed water system improvements for the first phase to be constructed throughout the 1991 to 1995 timeframe is shown on the following page. An allowance of 15 percent for engineering and 20 percent for contingencies was added to the construction costs to determine total capital costs. The costs include an inflation factor of 4 percent per year. In addition, a cost SUI\IIIll.ry of all the proposed water system improvements through the year 2010 is shown on the following page. These costs include the first stage from 1991 to 1995 and all other proposed improvements through year 2010. E-6 CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC - iI.J 1 .' ~T---- o o o CXlST fUlMARY FCm WATER SYSTE2t IMPIWJIImU'Nl'S PkJlu;rv FCm 'DIE FIRST ~YFAR PERIa) (1991 '10 1995) Construction Enqineering Total Iqlrovement Type Cost and Contin~ncies ca~ital Cost ($ million) ($ mill on) ( lllillion) -, Storage Facilities 17.6 6.1 23.7 Puqling Stations 4.0 1.4 5.4 Pipelines 16.6 5.8 22.4 SUpply Sources 9.7 3.4 13.1 SUbtotal 47.8 16.8 64.6 Land Acquisition 2.4 "..' - 'roTAL FOR 'DIE FIRST ~YEl\R_ PERIOD (1991-1995): $67.0 r-' CXlST &IDmRY FCm ALL NM'ER Sz:nUl DIPKI\II!III!Nl P1a..It'\lbrv 1'IE 'DIE I!Nl'IllE 2G-YFAR mm PERIOD (1991 '10 2010) Construction Enqineering IqIrovement Type Cost and Conti~eies ($ mil11on) ($ 1111 on) Storage Facilities 41.6 17.0 Puqling Stations 14.2 6.0 Pipelines 49.2 20.4 SUpply SOUrces 40.2 7.6 SUbtotal 145.2 50.9 Land Acquisition Total fUital Cost 1I1111on) ~ 58.6 20.2 69.6 47.8 196.2 2.4 r IL.- I i i. i' i I I i i i i I I I I - 'roTAL FOR 'DIE 2G-YFAR PERIOD (1991-2010): $198.6 E-7 CAMP :>j:!ESS~Q !. ~.':II:::: l~C .' o~ --- _.. - o o o r II m~t~~GG~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ i --- - .,.s r fil~ 5~~!i!~!~ m !!!5~~~~!!! I e_ ... ..... - tii OJ p r: Ef !!!!~~!!! III ~~~!!!!!!!! ! p .,; r w I " I e r .!!f! I! g.., !g!!~~~s~ ! ..~fifi!~~I!~ ! I ig ". Eo p 00000 ooCII CII r ~ ~! :::) .. .. e Q.O C EE II 'l5 'l5 ~:E ill III . In . llllll i ilIilI......IUlil ~ , (: Q. Cle CD_ CD ~ >-CD 1D'lij 11 If' CD 'E :is I!i ! iliI2::E::E2::E2::E ::E212221iUill ~ -w i~ [ ~i ul~ulu ~ l111n d ~l ~i J U iI~ ~~ ( )1) illl L.. 11111111 u.... W 1<< ~!. [ I1I111I11 I!!!))III [ E~E d~ IJ In- iiiiiiiii 111;},,!1 t [ j 1!1'li!11 . . . . . . . . . h Ii li1.!i~11i s 111111111 l I 111111":.11 11111111111 ii!illiii [ ~~:!~~:n~~:: !~!!ul~I:i:!~ U 7-6 [ C':' 'I'=' DRESSER & McKEE INC -, 0:- ----... - . --.- - 0 0 0 I , I I ' . I 1.1: r' II .~~~~~~ i "IS fiJ~ ~~..Il 0 I r - ~ __0000 ID f: Ef ~lfiU!~ ~ ! cioocicici - - r w oil c: r Sf I~ ILIIl !!~~i~ 8. .. 1:= - II! -8 .. ~ - E'O " ~! r' GI r~ :::l ! c: Q.O 1: E5 II .. 0 ';:~ lilJUlllllll ~ ~ 2- III c: r GI_ CD ~ >GI U)1ij _ . E "8 ~1I22:::E2 :is ~- ! .1 r ~ "Em & 1Il'lij. i8 I" r ~1 ii-lIli me 111!1! 11i 'OIL . , ~I 11..li_ -ji I 0.... JlillJ 1 1 [ :l:l:l:l:l:l hll II , I . . "I Illljlj i I . iilJii II t~ i I I i I I Ill'I~~ I 1[" I ~ ss.s~. 111111111111 u1iJ'1 P I I 111111 Il HhiU It t~~t~t [ ~ irHn ~ Efi f!;~~i: a::~2 [ 7-7 L CAVP DR::SSER &. Mc'<IEE 1"1:"; .' 0' c:>EXHIBIT NB- c:> CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO WATER DEPARTMENT SEWER AND WATER FINANCING PLAN o BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS Margaret H. Chandler, President Robert Bivens Emilia Garcia James H. Urata Harold W. Willis Bernard C. Kersey, Genml Mll1IflgeT Duane B. Norton, Director of Water R6e1amation Joseph F. Stejskal, Director of Engineering, Const1UCtion, and Maintenance Ir ! November 1990 BARTLE WELLS ASSOCIATES Independent Public Finance Advisors 1636 Bush Street San Francisco CA 94109 Tel. 415/775-3113 I:. I .' .' 0: r ( ( ! (. (' ( . " , . o o o . ..' SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL CHARGES . SewerSystem . . '. Sewer user charges have' not increased since October 1983. ~ . . . The fj,nSlnrillg plan can be funded by: . . ...... ......... ............ .... .... ............................ . ......................... ..... '. A $2,800 connection Charge effective JanuaJy 1; .1991 or sooner, . .... .' .. ....... ....i.....:r=o;n=ta~Jf~~~.in the past)in~~:..i> ..... . Pull Growth: An annual capital charge of $30 ~Jan;;~ ". ..' ary 1.1991. increased tO$?<'iIl:~~8I99. '." ...... ,.::.....::.~ . ...... . Slow GnJwth: An annual capital c:barge Of $36 beginn;nIJaJlli~." ':.:: .... ..................... . ary It.l9?l~ .~.~ ..l:?.~.~~in 1996~~:,.....:.:'........:.:>':....h;:.:......:;;;ZI:m . CaS~ balarices shoUld be used to furld the higbest-~~rif:Yc:a~t..r: .' 'm' .' .' .....I)l't)1.~ ........ ,. ..... ............,.,..:.,.:.....'m~......:.::,..:;'.::...,....... ...... ...,..::.::..,..,....:.::..:..;.<::.;:'..;;.',:.."'...,,:"'..::.:.....:....::.::...:,.....'...........""."'.., .............:~~~~dJli~~~aDd both~Si(maJ!~~!!-;ii#~...t.... .........~~!~1.~..~....~.....:........:'.....:........:....;l'i..~...st~t~..l~~:.i........ .':.,:..;n..i;;;;;;;;:~;~;;n2:;,':,':U . othetptOj~ shoUld be fUtta;;d by a series of four bOnd~fi,l8n~".';::\::' .. ...wl::s::t: meet.::ject=T-7c~o~ ::~es:.;;m..~;:!;i!'fil;.lt:.g;;;#:i.:ii~ !~c~~E~'~.III,; '. ....TitefinancingpJariiDcludescaPital projects ffOln'tbi!im iiri~:::"'c\ .'. .>\ ment plan as weJ1&1S.1!J?evil Canypntreattneirt PlaJ1t."The~~D$@dr: . ...... .'. ..........:....~ furideci ~y; ../}.?}...;.:.:...:.;::?,,; ..'.....:........ :.., ..:.........:..;::,... .......,../.......................i:::;:;.n;..::?....: ..:. :. .. : ::~: ":::.:-:.:"::::.: .:.:.;.:.;.::-:: ". . '...: ;':::. ;. ':-:::':. ".:.:.::.:.:-:.:.:.::: :-:.:.::::. .::.:.:.;:::.:~.:.:.::.:.:.::~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:;.:.;:.:;:;;:. ;'. .: ':..: '.:.: .::. ,:,:,.:;;;,: ::.: ;';:':':':':~':;;:':':'. :::. .;;:.:.:::. :-:.:.:.:-:: .:.:.:.:.:.~:.:-:.:.:.:.::.:.:.;:.:.;.:.:.::.::.::.:.: :':':':':':':.:':' . ;;I;lIfI;;I~T~~~~~~~~~-~;,t~~I!t;;.!~t~JIi~i!.ilflWt~ !!,!!"t,.~.ti~~."lI.tl .........................~.....U~..;~~h.~.n~~tc:l.ftihdj~~;11;;i990..hn~~;;;i...p.h;i~.::::.:::;:; ::::::{:::::"::::::"::':':::':'::':':':::"':" : :.:.. ::'.::.:..: '::'. :...:.:::.\....: :'. .:.... ;..::;:.;.:.:'.::.:. ::::.;:.;:....::.:::.. ....::.;... ..:.:. ..:". ... :-:....:.::. :':::::'::':':". :::::.~.:;....:.;;;..~.:~:::::::::::.::::::/:::::::::::::.::;':::::::::::" i.i~~~~f=~le~f;~d~~tians~i~~~~Ef~:;II:~';:: . ......... .... ........... ... .... . .. . .. ......... ..... .. .... ........ ... ~. Ii Use bOnd-financed leases to finance the remaining piojects~.:.TbeJPA\ . . ........ cOUld be used for this purpose. ...... .'. . .......... . . ..... .... ".i' ..... . ...,..:.., " o~ r , . .... ( fo r ( I I I I I ( to L Q o o o WAlER SYSTEM CUrrent and Future Capacity , Table 1 shows 49,400 (rounded) water ERU's as of July I, 1990. The financial plan shows both full.growth (1,000 ERU's/year) and slow-growth (BOO ERU's1year) scenarios. Lack of rainfall in the past four years reduced the ~ of groundwater aquifers from 'Yhich 9S percent of the system water supply 15 derived. Conse. quently, production capacity had been reduced from 81.6 mgd in 1986 to 46.7 mgd in August 1989. Expenses were recently incurred to complete capital projects necessary to increase production capacity to 87 mgd. An engineering master plan study was recently completed which evaluated capacity and reconunended a 5 year cafital improvement plan. See the sub- sequent section titled "Capital Projects. Rates and Charges . Table 13 shows water rates and charges currently in effect. These rates be- came effective in November 1989, fofiowing a rate study by the department in September 1989 and pre1iminaIy financial plan data from Bartle wellS Associates. Rate adjustments were required at that time to forestall a revenue shortfall projected for 1989/90. TABLE 13 . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO WATER UTILITY RATES AND CHARGES' Meter Size 5/8" 3/4" I" 1-1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" CapaCity Factor MinillUll Monthly Charge $ 5.50 7.35 8.80 15.75 22.00 37.40 63.55 114.40 171.60 214.50 256.40 Conswaption Allowance (hef) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Consumption Charge For Acguisition- ~s Of-Service (per hcf) Charge $0.60 . $ 1,400 0.60 1,400 0.60 1,400 0.60 5,650 0.60 8,480 0.60 14,130 0.60 19,700 0.60 45,77~ 0.60 -- 0.60 __I 0.60 __I 4.0 6.0 10.0 14.0 35.0 SO.O 60.0 1 - Based on revised dates adopted November 1989 for single-family, COlD- mercial, and industrial users (except Del.-nn Heights). Multiple- falrily dwelling unit rates are as follows. Minimum monthly charge: First unit shall be the same as A, each additional unit served by meter shall be $2.20 per unit per month. Cubic foot allowance: First unit shall be the same as A, each additional unit served by llIl!ter shall be 200 cubic feet per month. All usage in excess of allowance per IOftth shall be $0.60 per 100 cubic feet. 2 - To be determined. 19 ~o~ 0 0 0 Delmann Heights users pay a minimum monthly charge be2inning at $4.50 for a sIr. 3/"" meter, but pay a usage charge of $0.70 per hcf for the mt 3 hcf aud $0.844 for each bd thereafter. Income and ~n. History Table 14 shows a five.,. history of income and expenses for the water utility through JuDe 30, 1989. The water utility enterpnse incurred both a net operatiDg and a net loss for the &seal years 1986 through 1988. The water utility's primary source of incoll"'" is water sales to metered customers, fire service, contractors, and other agencies. OJleratiDg income has iDcftased about 70 percent from $5.7 million to $9.7 million over the last live years. Operating expenses con- sist of water production, distribution 0BcM (operation and maintenance) costs, BeneraI adJl1in- istration and overhead, depreciation and genelal services. The municipal water department is committed, by ordinance, to tranSfer to the City of San Bernardino 10 percent of its collec- tions on gross water sales, as adjusted for water sales to the city. TABLE 14 . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO WATER UTILITY HISTORY OF INCOME AND EXPENSES . 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 , Operati:y IIIC3e $ 5,693,625 $ 5,952,650 $ 6,379,018 $ 7,429,901 $ 9,669,052 Water sa es Service charges 21.081 23.899 25.396 28.792 30.956 Total operating incCllll! $ 5,714,706 $ 5,976,549 $ 6,404,414 $ 7,458,693 $ 9,700,008 Operating Costs $ 1,097,930 $ 1,659,586 $ 1,896,271 $ 2,013.320 $ 2,313,880 Water production expense Purchased water 24,991 25,007 24,991 69,51B 69,313 Other plant expenses 272,480 204,924 189,661 205,415 262,786 Di stri buti on system DIM 575,298 566,037 545,144 702,031 930,714 General achinistration and overhead 1,415,910 1,860,407 2,121,875 2,249,735 2,347,501 Depreei ati on 760,220 973,695 979,914 1,106,68B 1,183,954 Portion capitalized (310,946) (277,906) (285,629) (385,285) (452,287) in construction General services 1.612.891 1.&10.390 1.994.401 2.214.014 2.518.242 Total operating costs $ 5,448,774 $ 6,842,140 $ 7,466,628 $ 8,175,436 $ 9,184,103 Excess operating incCllll! $ $ (865,591) $(1,062,214) $ (1oss) 265,932 (716,743) $ 515,905 IonOperating I~ $ 264,978 $ 174,844 $ Interest incClllll! 111,280 $ 53,596 $ 113,575 Reilllbursement 181,353 217,814 136,733 417,031 498,399 1~ transfer to city (~::! (58~:=) (::~) (684,447) Jm:~l Other 367.174 Net income (1oss) $ 120,194 $(1,058,292) $(1,000,676) $ (563,389) $ 74,772 Source: Prepared by Bartle Wells Associates from audited financial statements of the water fund. 20 -' ~ .' 0 r r r r r 'r, ( [ (; c e o o o Olpital ProjectS In 1981, a water system master plan was prepared to identify necessary water system improvements for the city's service area. Continued rapid growth in the number of customers, combined with expansion of the service area and signifi- cant changes in available water system, made it necessary to update the 1981 Water System Master PIon. Camp, lAllSJer &: McKee (COM) completed a master plan update in September 1990. This update uses a planning horizon of 2010 and provides cost and phasing information for the firSt five years. Service Area: The service area of the San Bernardino municipal water depart- ment is bounded on the north !?' the San Bernardino National Forest and on the east by East Valley Water District, Norton Air Force Base, Victoria Farms Mutual Water Company, and South San Bernardino County Water District. It is bounded on the south ~ the cities of Loma Linda and Colton, and on the west by West San Bemardino County Water District, the City of Rialto, and the Muscoy Mutual Water Company. The service area of approximately 45 ~ miles is divided into 18 pressure zones, which range in ground elevation approximately 1,000 to 2,500 feet. Water o-m....&:: The total existing maximum day demand in 1989/90 was approximately 61,000 gallons per minute (gpm), while the projected future maximum day demand in 2010 was estimated at 93,000 gpm. Water Supply: The city currently obtains most of its water from groundwater wells. A 5ina11 amount of surface water (approximately 800 gpm) is currently treated at the Devil Canyon filter plant and Used in the 1720 Zone. No State Water Project (SWP) water has ever been used directly by the city. The city must rely on ~ts existing storage C:lljlBcity and supplemental SWP water imported through San Bernardino VIWef Municipal Water District for groundwater recharge in order to meet the exiSting mmmnm day tI,.",..,dll. During the SUJ1ID1er', the northwestem portion 0 the service area can margiDally meet existing m..'W'imum day d,.",..ntI. liDd does not have suMmont production capacity to meet future m..'W'imum day demand. The Upper Zone bas major problems for existing and future conditions due to production restrictions on wells with trace pollutants. The Lower Zone region bas some excess produc- tion capacity under existing conditions; however, present production levels cannot meet the projected future demand. - Water ~ ADalysis: The water system analysis was performed by COM. The analysis found that the major oVerall system deficiencies were the inade- quacy of the. existing pumping capability and trsftcmiccion mains to move water from the 1ower.:elevation zones to the high~-e1evation zones. Also, several of the Upper Zone's existing production wells may exceed the action levels of some regulated organic: pollutants in the near future. Based on the identified deficiencies, an overall system alternative was dl'fin..d for the city's water system. The resultant backbone system is shown graphic:- ally on the system map (page 22). Five-Year Costs and 5tslgi"l of Rew...n.......ed ImproVeIDeDII: The water sys. tem plan includes construction cost estimates and" a program for staging con. struction of the recommended water system improvements to correct existing 21 , ., 0' o o o deficiencies and provide orderly expansion of the water system to meet future demands. A detiiled capital im~t p~ was developed for the major supply, storage, pumping, and ttanSmiSSlon main improvements needed for the ary's overall system during the period from 1991 to 1995. A cost summary of the proposed water system improvements for the first phase to be constrUcted throughout 1991-1995 totals $61.0 million and is shown in Table 15. An allowance of 15 percent for engineering and 20 percent for con- tingencies was added to the construction costs to determine total capital costs. The costs are based on a Los Angeles ENR Construction Cost Index of S800 and include an inflation factor of 4 percent per year to the recommended start-of-constrUction date. TABLE 15 . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIVE-YEAR 1990 IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PROJECT SUMMARY ($000) . Tran~ission Lines 128 lines 168 lines 208 lines 248 lines 308 lines 368 lines Total transmission Land Acquisition Upper Zone Lower Zone Elevated Zone 1913' Zone 2500' Zone Total land acquisition Storage 9 Reservoirs (30.9 HG) - various locations ~ Stations Lower tank site (future) Upper tank site (future) 40th Street. Sepulveda Foothill Boulevard' 4th Street Myers Canyon 2300' tank site (future) Total pUlllpi:ng Supply 9 Wells - various locations Well-head treatment - 19th Street plant Well-head treatment - 25th & 27th Streets plant Supply - Lytle Creek Total supply Grand total $ 538 431 6,390 3,403 2,267 12l:1~ r- " $ 1,050 440 270 220 n:tI $23,679 $ 1,460 1,519 964 393 505 l s,lU $ 2,801 3,424 3,986 . $66,967 . Source: COM September 1990 ~ster Plan update. 23 . , ( <" 0 I r r: (1 ~. r ( Co' . " CJ o o o Devil ~ The water department has projected requirements for a water treatment facility in the Devil CInyon area including. feeder tiDe to the dis- nibution system. 'l'be plant woukl be developed in twO stages. The department estimates that such faCWties would cost $28.0 million in 1990 dol1ars. The department plans to begin construction after completion of improvement plan projects, with the first phase beginning in 1996197. Inflated costs total $38.7 million and it Is estimated that 7S pen:ent of such costs are related to growth. Cash Plow Projection: Table 16 shows a ten-year cash flow projection for the period eNl;...., 1999/00, with total inflated costs of: Five-year 1990 improvelent plan Devil Canyon Total $ 67.0 .1111on ~ The table also shows the portion of costs related to growth based on estimates by COM and the department. 1990/91 CoDstruction Pmgnm: The department has made some additions, substitutions, and deletions to the first-year (1990/91) projects ~ by COM, but project costs still total $9.6 million. The department IS fund;..., these projects from its $11,463,000 share of the $18,600,000 West End Water Development, Treatment, and Conservation Joint Powers Authority certificates of parocipation, sold on August 7, 1990. Specific projects as shown in Table 17. Annual certificate inst-llmPnt paymeIlIS are allocated based on each joint powers authority participant's share of facility costs. Inst..llmE'l1t payment shares are as follows: City of San Bernardino West District City of Rialto 61.63% 20.71 17.66 Average annual fnstSIllments for the water department are $1.1 million. The Devil Canyon capital F,Oject is included for capital ~J~~n;:! P,Ul'- poses. It represents ap~tely 36 percent of the total cap ~1IIl m- duded in the fi_MAl plan. HCJWeWlr, the project is DOt sc:beclWed 1996/97. Therefore, the capital cost and rate impact of this project could be mitigated by a number of future events and contingencies before the F'?ject is approved and implemented. Such events could include, but are not limited to: . Availability of deliveries from the State Water Project . Local capacity . Engineering estimates 24 ',' ,... p f'; "" (' ( c G . . o { ... .. .. ... - u C> ... ... ... .. .. - ...- ...- ..- >> - - ... ...... .. ... ..u ...- - - - 1:2 - .. ::a~ !;~ .. =- == >> C> a::: ;;;~ ..... ... C> - .. =- - - ... - - -... co .. .. ;1== --... .. u >> - M - o .. .. .. - - - - - .. .. - - - .. - - .. - ... .. .. - ... .. , - ... - - - ; - - ~ ... ... .. - - ... u ~=~..Q: ...____ I .. .. ... .. .. I ----- . - - - I .,. . - .. - ~ .. .. - ~ .. - - - - - - .... - ~ .. .... - ~ .. - - .. - - - - - - .. - - - .. - - .. .. - - u .. ~ o .. ... - .. - .. ... .,. --- .. - -~ ~ .. - - - ~ .,. ...-- --- --- .."~ -- ... - - .,. --- ~-... -:.~~ ~-- -- - ~ - .,. --~ --- ~-- - .... _........, ___r-_ ":.-:.-:.~.n ---- ... - - ~ ... - C> - E:!= 15;:5: ..... ... :.~~II- -- ... _aCt__ _.c=~= ..=wcn_ .. - - ... . C> - !C .. ... ~ ... - '" ... ... ... - ... - ~-~ --- --- ~..;...; - - .. - .. .. ~- -- - .. . . -- - .. - - ~ .. - ~ - - ~ - - ~ ~ - - - ~ - - - .. ... ~ - ..~_C>> -..-- coO..... c.> .. .. .. --- ...- - ... - - = ;; = ... ... .... ... ... co - ~=..... .~== - ..... =>>..:I~'O --..- = ... A5~ ... ...-- .. ..-.. - ""'-- ~ .. - - .,. .,. ~ - - ... - - ... - ... ... - ~ - - .. - ... ~... -- - .~ :!;:... .,. - - - - - .,. .. ... .,. ... ... ... - .... ~ .; - ... -...- .......... ""':.-"":. -....- - - ... ... ... _....- --... ~ .- .... ..- ~ - ... ... ... ~....~ ...~- - ~ .~ ~~- - ... ... ... --~ ~~- ~ .~ .- . -...- - ... ... ... ...-- ~-- ~ .- .~ . -~... - ... ... ... --- ...... - ~ .- .- --- ... ... ... .. - - - ... ~ . - '" ... E _ C> ~~ ~~ ~! =~ .. ... ...- ...... --::1; E....e o ;I: - 1= . .0- lie . . , . . . . , . , . . , . . . . . , . . , . , , , , , , . . , , . , . . , . , , . . , , . , .. ... E- ...D ~... -2 Ill_ ...- -.... .. .. ... _u... Iit=.... ..-.. ... .. ....- -- c::.=:: C> ........ C> .. ~Iill:! ... ... ...- -- ... .. - :lei 8=CJ ...-- 1;:1:::: _i!_ - ::: - "0 .. . 0 0 0 TABLE 17 . CITY OF SAN BERHARDINO 1990/91 BOND-FINANCED WATER fACILITIES Start comgletion Project Date ate Cost Transmssion Syst. Jan 1991 Jun 1991 $ Maynolia Avenue - 24" 5,000' 725,000 .. 2 00 pressure zone - ,ers C'yn May 1990 Nov 1990 189,000 Meridian Avenue - 16" ,600 Terrace ~ressure zone 10th . J treets May 1990 Nov 1990 85,000 12".16"-20" 3,500' s~camore transmission main Feb 1991 Aug 1991 516,400 0" 8,321' $1,515,400 Total trans.ission system Land Acquisition Oct 1990 $1,146,800 Lower pressure zone tank - 8 acres Nt. Vernon site - 13.5 MG Acacia Street site Nov 1990 100,000 Future wellhead treatment srI ant " u~per pressure zone tank - acres Dec 1990 636,800 rofosed site - 8.0 MG Tota land acquisition $1,883,600 StoT 4.5 reservoir - 1,580 HWL Aug 1990 Jun 1991 2,430,000 ~ New Sycamore '2 tank 2.0 MG reservoir - 2,100 HWL Aug 1990 Aug 1991 1,755,000 New Myers Canyon tank l4,185,OOO Total storage SugUY $ 2, -gpm well on 40th Street Sep 1990 May 1991 378,000 Del Rosa s~st. 650-gr we I at Devore tank Sep 1990 May 1991 . 378,000 2 1 pressure zone well 3,6OO-1~ replacelent well Dec 1990 Jun 1991 320,000 17th Sierra Way . uccer intenaediate zone 4 O-gpm - 10th. J well Feb 1990 Mar 1991 200,000 f tower pressure zone well 2,500-gpll - Olive' Gardner well Mar 1990 Apr 1991 200,000 Lower pressure zone well $1,476,000 Total supply ~ng Stations $ 1,6 -YVT ~umping station Nay 1990 Sep 1991 220,000 (I Footh I Pennsylvania, f~ lower zone to terrace zone 2,ooo-ypm ~umping station Mar 1991 Nov 1991 150,000 Basel ne Can1on, f~ lower zone to lntermediate zone 5~000.gpm pumping station - Newmark May 1990 Mar 1991 140,000 (.. ~ upper zone to SycallOre zone l 510,060 Total pumping stations Grand total $9,570,000 0 28 "Of r. c. ~ ( f l c c' Q o o o The fjl'lIncing plan which follows will provide funding for the project based on available infOrmation, but should be ~uated in approximately five years, or sooner depending on project approval. ~~ =ur 1989 review of capital rates allocation of future capital costs, the department prepared a rate study and proposed increases in bOth the quantity rate and capital charges. This study and ll!COD1l'1"....d~tions were adopted by the board in October and became effective in November 1989. Capital charges were increased as follows: Former Rate New Rate Increase Monthly meter charge . Acquisition-of-service charge $4.50 $707 $5.50 $1,400 $1.00 $693 Additional capital costs resulting from the June 1990 improvement plan will require further increases in both capital charges. Punds from the increase in the monthly service charge increase should be used for capital costs benefiting existing users. punds from the increase in the acquisition-of-service charge should be used to finance the growth-related portion of the capital project financing plan. Capital Resem!S . The department estimates capital improvement funds available for all projects on July 1,1990 at $500,000. pinJlnMng Plan The financing plans which follow provide a ten-year projection of water utility revenues and eXpenditures based on the analysis. cost Bnd growth estimates de- veloped above. The plan includes Dt!W capital charges eft'ec:tive November 1989 and includes interest earnings on available hAll1......... at 1 percent per year. The plans recom""",,d a ""IA........ pros;ram of finAn,.;"r using pay-as-YOU-JO (cash-balance) finA..,.;nr when av8i1able and bond fiftllnM"r for the pmA,nt!er: Cash ""IA"e-<' could be used for all pum$jects shown in the five-year ~ plan and also the 1991/92 'project. All other bnprove- ment plan projects and the Devil c:an,on Would be fiftllft.....! widi bonds. The plan is d~ to equate gmwth_plAtM revenues (i.e., ('()t..-:tion charges) with growth-related capital expenses. DuriDg the ten-year period shown, Such revenues have been allocated 58 percent to irowth-related ~ and 42 percent to existing customers (user charges) in the CuD-growth scenario. The plan assumes the following capital rates will be revised as necessary to fund capital expenses. . User capital charges . Connection charges 27 .. 0 ; ~ .- " 1- , ~ - o o o The financing plan shows a total of $105.6 million in capital project costs. Bond princiPlillJllounts and cash expenses required to implement this plan are summarized" below. Year AIIount 1990/91 San Bernardino share (JPA COP's) 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1996/97 1999/00 Total bond principal amount Cash-financed projects Grand total capital expense $ 11,463,000 14,650,000 17,510,000 15,560,000 12,280,000 25,950,000 18'm'~00 1116, ,00 5.676.000 1121,979,000 FuJI Grow1h: Table 18A shows the full~ (1,000 ERl1s per year) fimmring plan required to fund proposed capital unprovements shown in Table 15. This assumption can be funded by: . lncreasing the acquisition-of-service (connection) charge to $2,700 as soon as possible and 10 percent annually thereafter. . Increasing the monthly meter charge (annual capital charge) from the current annual rate of $24 to $36 as soon as posslole, $48 in 1992/93, $60 in 1994/95, and $72 in 1996/97. . This plan will still provide an _"i"g lull""!:e of approximately $2.6 million for future debt service payments and future projects. Slow Growth: Table 188 shows the slow-growth (800 ERl1s per year) fimnuoing . C~ to fund the SIJIle capital improVeltlents. This assumption can be . Increasing the acquisition-of-service (connection) charge to $2,700 as soon as poss1'ble and 10 pereent annually thereafter. . Incn'"d"i the monthly meter c:harge (annual capital charge) from the current annual rate of $24 to $42 as soon as possl'ble, $66 in 1992/93, $78 in 1994/95, and $96 in 1996/91. This plan will still provide an ('T>"i"i balll~ of appro~mately $2.8 million for future debt service payments and future projects. Financing Methods The city bas the SIJI1e local borrowing method available for water capital proj- . ects as previously identified in the SBWI!Il sm1!M section of this repon. Further, the city is a participant in the West End Water Development. Treatment, and Conservation Joint Powers Authority. The city participated in the authority's first issue of certificates of participation in August 1990, and could participate in future such issues for water projects. 28 ., o , ( (-' ( ( ( c (; o i! - !!i_ -- -- -- i~ ~i! .. - - .. -- -- ~II -- ~II "iii e. ~i !r:; -- :.. -= 11_ -. - -... ==e -. .0 :a~2 0-" ..... . I !I - - - ~ -- -- ""- - - - - :- - =: -- -- -- .; - - ~ ~ - =: -- -- -- - - ~ - - - - =: -- -- -- .; - - - - - - =: -- -- -- - - - 5 - =: -- -- -- ..: - - - - - - =: -- -- -- :::: - ~ - - =: - - ::: - =: - - - - - =: - - - = =: .. =- ! - .. m E = ~-1;; ! .- t:. =~.1 i -- -- ~- - - -- -- -- .; - -- -- -- = -- - = ..: - === :-~ : - " li - - - .; - " -- :..- r.-~ :: - :: 5 " : : " " " E " !! " : :: " " !~ i' - = .; - - - :; - - - - - - - - :i - :: .. - - " -- ": -- -~ E - : " " - - ~ :::: - - ~ - - - - .; - : " " " ::: .,-... : .. " - " . . . . " " : " " . . " . " 5 . = 5 -- -- -- .; - -- -- -- - - -- ~- -- - - -- ~- -- - - -- -~ -~ - -- -~ -- ..: - -- -- -- ..; - _1 ~\ :=. !:' :;1 ... ~! II -- -Q-- - -- - -- w __... - --- : :;~- - - - :i - ..: - --- --- --- w:..... --- ~-;.- -- - - ~ - - :: - --- --- -:.-:.-:. --- --- --:c:.- -- - - - ..: ::: - - --- --- c:.-:.-:. --~ --- ~~- -- - - ~ - - - - --- --- --- ..-" --- --- -- - - - - ::: ti --- --- a:.-:-:. --- --- --- ...;..; - - ~ - -:. - - --- --- ~~~ "'":.r:- -- - - - ..: - ~ --- --- --- .....: --~ ~-- ..... - - - 5 - - --- --- -:'-:'-:' --- --- --:.--:- -- - - - 1! i i ! i i , --- --- --- ~-.; --- ~::- ; . i .! .. .. i -- - 0- E :::- -. 00 I "'r , 0 .. :... .. rl iIi:ii ___ e 'C1!! ~;;. nH! :;r:; ...- - --- - - - .; - - = - -- -- -- -- = - - - - - - :: - -- ~,== -- - =: = == ~5~:: :;: = - - - - - ~ "" - - ~- -- -- -- =: - - - = ~ : -- -- -- ,,-- - =: - - ~ - - - .; - -- -- -- -- - =: - - - - = - - " -- -- -- -- - =: - - :; - ::: - -- -- -- -- - =: - - - ::: ~ - -- -- -- -- - =: - = .; - - - - -- -- -- -- - =: -- -- -- -- - - - -I 11 o ... E - I ~~ .!.! . ~ . ~ .. Ii I e E . - ... :: 0= = ; - - - ..: ::: - - ~ - = - - - .; ::: - - - ~ - ::: - - ~ - = - - - - .; = - - - .., :=: - --- --- --- ....;.: --- -~::: - - - ..: :: - - - -' - - - - - - .., - - - - - ; - - - - .., - ~ - - - .., - .. - - - - .., = - --- --- -=.-:'-:' --- --- :::~~ - - ~ ~ - ==-== -:.-:.~-:.-:. ....-....-- .....--- -:--:'-:'-P;. --- - - - :; - :: ---- ---- ---- i:s;= --:.--:.-:.- --- - - - - "" ---- ---- -:.-:.-:.-:. ....-....- po... ...- -:--:.-:.- --- - - ~ - "': ---- ---- ---- ~..~. .....-- "'":."':.-:.- --- - - - ..: - "" - -- -- -- ..;.. ~- :::: - - ~ - - :: -- -- -=.-:. -- -- --:.--:. -- --- --- -:.-:.~ --- --~ ~"'":."'":. --- 5'15151555== ;"'rJ"'JJJJI ... iE ~~~~~~~~~~~ ====1:=====- w:."':.~"'":.-:'~"'":."l"'":.~=: ----..------ - - --- - ~;:~~;;:~~~~;=~ ~;..; ..;;.. - . -------. . .= =-1=-1=-1= I<;:!~. "'1' tI ~ -::.:: _ ! ~ I. ~ I. ~ I. ~ E - - Ijjjjjljjl;! ~ ..--.........-........--- ....-..........--c-- :- . - - - - - . aU III - . & --....-.....-...---- ----------- = - ~ - - - - - ,.: - .. .., - - - ~ - =: .., - - - ~ - ~ - - - - ~ - - - .. - = - .; - - .. - i .; ::: - - - - - .., ~ - .; - = ~ - - ~ - - , - :: :..: , - , - i- i' - ~ - ~ - :: - II i iii e a .. fi - - - ~ = ..; - o - = .; = .. - - - - .. ~ - ..: - - - - .; - - .. - - - - ..: ::; .; - - - - .; - .. ..: - - - ~ ::: ..: - - - ~ - -:. .. - - - - ..: - ~ - - - - .; .. - .; - - :: ~ o ;:. , :: .. - o :: i - - . ~ = : . : } .'l'l '::'P ~... ill . .=== ! Ii --- =!:!::: .. - " j ". en UI if c c B III C UI cz: C UI U :; III cz: C\I UI en I ~ '" ; I I I L_ OX lIT "e" o :1 -- . Eel .~I .lIIe gC:. .-0. .en- o_c go. C\l~ ,gO :.~~ ..S .ll !-2j !~l , - 1_ I, , , _J ,~ I I,' ., f' I f............... . , . , , , , II II o .' -It -I I -t: --j ~z, . : I I gi ~' ~! o u ~I ~ .; ~' l4.ii I : .. .. . I ..' c' Ii <I 1:' ,I .. I !': Ii ul ---' . L. b. "01 o EXHIBIT -n- 0 o San Bernardino Municipal Water Department 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California APPLICATION FOR MAIN EXTENSIONS RULE & REGULATION NO. 20 (a) New Reauests for Service To provide water service to any parcel of land requiring an extension of the existing water pipeline system, the develop- er/contractor shall submit to the Water Department a request for service. The Department shall require the following: 1. A complete legal description of the parcel requiring service. 2. A plat map showing the proposed water service location. 3. Additional information as may be required.. (b) Plan Check Fee - Accroval or Disaccroval of Reauest For Main Extension Upon application for a main extension, the developer /con- tractor shall pay a plan check fee of $500.00 or $.25 per lineal foot of pipeline whichever is greater. Upon receipt of said fee and three (3) engineered copies of the proposed development map (1" = 40 I scale), the Water Department shall analyze the availability of supply, the adequacy of the supporting pressure zone, and determine the facilities required for the proposed development. The results of the investigation and the request for service will be submitted to the General Manager for consideration, approval or disapproval. The Water Department engineering staff shall assist (plan check) the developer/contractor' s engineer in the design of the required water facilities (shall apply to both Water Department and developer/contractor installed facili- ties) . If the request for a main extension installation is approved, the developer/contractor shall pay the Water Department, as applicable, according to the following: (1) Main Line Installation (Bv Water DeDartmentl When a main extension is necessary to provide water service to a customer, the developer/contractor shall pay all applicable charges and fees for water service as required by ;< 0 j o o o the Department. The Water Department shall not install any water mains until all applicable charges and fees have been paid. The Water Department will only install water mains in dedicated, accepted, and graded public right-of-way. a. 4" $14.00 Per Lineal Foot b. 6" $16.00 Per Lineal Foot c. 8" $22.00 Per LIneal Foot d. 12" $32.00 Per Lineal Foot e. Larger Than 12" Time and Material + Absorption Charges (2) Main Line Installation IBv DeveloDer/Contractorl Based on Water Department workload and/or adverse site conditions, the Department may require the applicant for a new main extension to use a licensed pipeline or Class A contrac- tor to install new mains, hydrants and service laterals for the proposed development. The pipeline contractor shall be licensed by the state of California and acceptable to the Water Department. The contractor shall use only xittings and materials as specified by the Water Department. Service laterals installed by the developer/contractor shall terminate at the service angle valve. The developer/contractor shall enter into a main line installation agreement which shall stipulate the exact terms, conditions, and legal obligations of the applicant. The Department shall provide the develop- er/contractor with Water Department approved standard drawings to facilitate the design, installation, and inspection of all required water facilities. The Water Department will only authorize the installation of water mains in dedicated, accepted, pUblic right-of-way. (3) Main Line Construction Insoection DeDosit for Mains and Water Facilities Installed Bv Develoner/Contractor The developer/contractor installed water facilities shall be inspected by the Department and/or a professional construction inspection consultant retained by the Department on an as- needed basis. The developer/contractor shall pay for inspection services based on actual cost. An inspection deposit of $350.00 or $1.00 per lineal foot of pipeline (whichever is greater) shall be collected prior to the final Department approval of the water main installation map. The developer/contractor shall provide the Department with three (3) engineered and approved by the Water Department copies of the proposed water main installation map (1" = 40' scale). Upon completion of construction inspection, the Water Department shall bill or refund for the actual inspection costs plus 10%. .. 01 o o o (4) Extraordinarv Facilitv Charge An extraordinary charge may be required for water main installations by the Water Department that incur extraordinary cost to install, i. e.. have poor soil conditions which requires imported fill materials, have extremely rocky conditions which require importing fill and large equipment rental, require boring under roadways and/or site conditions that would increase the cost of the main line installation above the per foot cost stated in (b) (1) of this Rule and Regulation. The Water Department shall determine whether unusual site conditions exist upon receipt of a request for service from the property owner or his authorized agent. The Water Department will make a complete investigation as set forth in (b) plan check fee for review and approval of the project. The developer/contractor shall deposit prior to the start of construction, the estimated extraordinary costs. At the completion of the project, the Water Department will bill or refund the actual extraordinary cost plus 10%. ( 5) Enaineerina Evaluation Fee - Reauest for Service New ~~~:~~~ ~~:~ ~~U~B~ for servi~e ~hat Mav Reauire the e f ddit10nal Transm1SS10n. storaae. and/or Production Facilities A water facility engineering evaluation fee of $1,000.00 will be deposited for service applications that require the installation of new pressure zones, additional storage reservoirs, boosters, wells, transmission mains, pressure reducing stations, and/or other facilities as a condition of service which may impact the Department's water distribution system. The Department or its engineer will perform the system engineering study to ensure that an adequate water supply at an acceptable pressure will be available. The actual cost to perform the engineering study will be borne by the developer. Refunds or billings will be made depending upon the actual engineering costs plus 10%. (6) Footaae Charae for Service from Water DeDartment Financed Main Extensions All applicants for water service from a water main installed and financed by the Water Department on or after June 1, 1977 where no mains were previously in service shall pay all applicable charges and fees for water service and one-half (1/2) of the per lineal foot charge in effect as of the time of application as described in (b) (1) across the frontage of the parcel. Should the parcel front both sides of the main, the applicant for service shall pay the full charge in effect as of the time of application as described in (b) (1) above. 0; o o o (c) Main Line Extension Aareement If the developer/contractor is not the owner of all property fronting the proposed main extension installation, then a contract may be entered into by the developer/contractor and the Board setting forth the following: 1. The official number and legal description of the tract or property to be served, and a plat showing the various parcels included therein. 2. The location and description of the proposed main extension and total amount of the water main construction charge to be paid in advance by said applicant to the City. 3. Designation of the parcels of property in said applica- tion not owned by the applicant that will be benefited by the main installation which are to be sUbject to Water Department rules, and charged a per front foot charge prior to and in addition to water service installation charges. 4. A provision that over a period of ten (10) years from the date of installation, the Water Department will refund semi-annually to the applicant, or his assignee, the water main extension charges that are collected from other consumers requiring service from the applicant's water main extension paid for by the applicant. Any balance remaining on deposit at the expiration of the said ten-year period shall become the property of the Municipal Water Department of the City of San Bernardino. 5. All extensions thus provided for, in accordance with these regulations, shall be and remain the property of the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department. 6. In no instance shall the applicant be reimbursed for more than the amount applicable in Section (b) (1) cost of main line installation by Water Department of this Rule and Regulation in effect at the time of installation for the reimbursable portion of the main extension. (d) Dead-End Mains No dead-end mains shall be permitted, except at the discretion of the General Manager of the Water Department, and in cases where circulation lines are necessary, they shall be designed and installed by the Water Department or the contractor as stipulated in Sections (b) (1) and/or (b) (2) of this Rule and Regulation, at the applicant's expense, including any necessary easements, and in addition to other charges properly applicable, as elsewhere set forth. "0' o o o (e) Corner Parcels All individual parcels requesting service requlrlng a main line installation that are bordered by dedicated right-of-ways on more than one side shall make payment to the Water Department based on the total of the dedicated right-of-way footages. (f) Acquisition of Service Charae The acquisition of service charge will apply to all new service applications, and is based upon the demand that each service size imposes on the municipal water system. USE/METER SIZE CAPACITY FACTOR AMOUNT 5/8" X 3/4" 3/4" X 3/4" 1" 1-1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 1.0 1.5 2.0 5.0 9.0 13.0 18.0 $ 2,700 4,050 5,400 13,500 24,300 35,100 48,600 *To Be' Determined *To Be Determined *To Be Determined *The acquisition of service charge for 6" and larger meter services shall be determined based on the availability of production, storage, and transmission facilities in the particular pressure zone where application for service is being made. Multiple Family dwelling units, including Motels and Mobile Home Parks, shall be charged $1400.00 per dwelling unit or by meter size, whichever is the greater amount. The acquisition of service charge shall be paid prior to any water service connection, and shall be in addition to all other charges imposed by the Water Department. (Fire Service excluded) . All applicants for new water service in the City shall pay an acquisition of service charge in accordance with the schedule in Section (f) hereof. The charge shall be paid prior to -any water service connection, and shall be in addition to all other charges imposed by the Water Department. (Fire Service excluded) . APPROVED: December 18, 1990 EFFECTIVE: February 1, 1991 '~o ~ 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2& 25 26 t:1 28 o o o RESOLUTION NO. ill A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AMENDING RULE AND REGULATION 110. 5 '1'0 INCREASE THE COST OF NEW DOMESTIC METER AND PIRE SERVICE INSTALLATIOI FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE SERVICE AREA OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, Article IX, Section 163 'of the City Charter, in part, empowers the Board of Water Commissioners to establish all water rates; and WHEREAS, these charges are set forth in the rules and regulations of said Board of Water Commissioners, and it is the duty of the Hayor and Common Council to pass ordinances as may be necessary to enforce said rules; and WHEREAS, the current rates set fortb in Rule and Regulation No. 5 are not sufficient in some meter sizes to cover the costs of installation; and WHEREAS, a proposed revision of Rule and Regulation No. 5 has been prepared, and a public hearing was held to receive comments from the public on the proposed revisions on December 18, 1990, and no comments or protests were received; and WHEREAS, an analysis of Department costs to install domestic services for the past two (2) 'fears and fire services for the past four (.) 'fe~~s was conducted and identified as Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, this study was available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing, and notice was given in compliance with Government Code Section 54992; and WHEREAS, a public hearing, noticed pursuant to and in compliance with Government Code Sections 54944.1 and 6062a, was VVUT'DT'" ""'111 .. 0' o o o 1 held at a regularly .cheduled ..eeting of the Board of Water 2 Commissioners; and 8 WHEREAS, the Board of Water Commis.ioners finds as follows: 4 A.) The purpose of Rule and Regulation 10. 5 is to fully 6 cover the cost of installing domestic water and fire services 6 within the entire serVice area of the San Bernardino Municipal 7 Water Department. 8 B.) The new service installation charges collected by Rule 9 and Regulation No.5, pursuant to this resolution, shall be used 10 to finance domestic and fire services described or identified in 11 Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 12 C.) After considering the study analysis prepared and listed 13 hereinabove, the testimony received at this pUblic hearing, the 14 Board approved said study and incorporates such herein, and further 15 finds that the new service installation charges, identified as 16 Exhibit "Bn attached hereto, will not exceed the total of these 17 costs. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Water Commissioners, City of San 19 Bernardino, does hereby resolve as follows: 20 SECTION 1. 21 A revised Rule and Regulation Ro. 5 (new .ervice installation 22 charge.) shall be set forth as Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and 23 shall be Charged upon all new water .ervice application., shall be :u paid prior to any water service connection, and shall be in 25 addition to all other charge. imposed by the Water Department. 26 SECTION 2. 27 The fees collected through Rule and Regulation No. 5 shall be used 28 to pay for the cost of installing domestic water and fire service. .< 0 1 o o o 1 2 a 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 r1 28 SIC'rION 3. Any jUdicial action or proceed to attack, review, .et a.ide, void, or annul this resolution shall bed brought within 120 day.. SECTION 4. This resolution shall become effective on February 1, 1991. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof' held on the 18th day of December , 1990, by the fOllowing vote, to-wit: AYES: Commissioners Chandler, Willis, Urata, Bivens' Garcia NAYS: None ABSENT: None L ERNARD C. KERSEY, De ty City Clerk . Ex-Officio Secretar ., 0 l o EXHIBIT -A-O o CIty or SA. BIR.AIDI.O MUlICIPAL WAtER DIPARThART II'1'EROrrICI MEMOJWU)UM PROPOSED REVISIO. or WAtER DIPAR'l'MD'l' RULI AD IEGOLAtIo. 110. 5 ,Based upon a two (2) year analysis of cost to install domestic meter services and a four (4) year analysis of cost to install fire services, we have revised the Water Department's Rule and Regulation No.5 (New Service Installation Charge.) a. follows: CURRENT INSTALLATION COST SIZE OF SERVICE 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" x 314" 1" 1-1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" COST DEPOSIT REOUIRED *UNIMPROVED STREIT (5/8" TO 1" ONLY . 520.00 545.00 585.00 800.00 1,840.00 3,275.00 3,950.00 COlt + 101 . 380.00 400.00 450.00 FIRE SERVICE 2" Fire 4" Fire 6" Fire COST COlt COlt Cost DEPOSIT REOOIRED + 101 + 101 + 101 PROPOSED IBSTALLATIOB COST SIZE or snVI~E COST DEPOSIT REOOIRE!) *UNIMPllOVD S'tllD! U/8" IfO 1- OIILY 5/8" x 314" 314" x 314" 1" 1-1/2" 2" 3" . 520.00 545.00 585.00 1,200.00 1,870.00 4,615.00 . 380.00 400.00 450.00 .' 0 t 0 0 0 *UNIMPROVED SIZE OF DEPOSIT STREET (5/8" SERVICE COS'!' ,REOUIRED '1'0 1" ONLY 4" Cost + 10' . 6,000.00 6" Cost + 10' 7,500.00 8" Cost + 10' 15,000.00 10" Cost + 10' 20,000.00 DEPOSIT FIRE SERVICE COS'!' REOUIRED 2" Fire Cost + 10' . 2,000.00 4" Fire Cost + 10' 6,000.00 6" Fire Cost + 10' 7,500.00 8" Fire Cost + 10' 15,000.00 10" Fire Cost + 10' 20,000.00 *Unimproved street cost is defined as meter service installations in new unpaved subdivisions when the Department is installing mains and services. .. C t C J t. fJo r . A. .q I . A . D I . 0 IIDJIJCIPAL WAUl DDAlr-t JII'fIIOrrJCI IIIItOIAROII o to: 'aul DoUer noli: Ihirle, Ci.lIOv.lti DAti: Septeaber 20, 1990 IUBJICf: III'tD IIStALLltIOI COlt 8U1VU COPIII: Joseph r. Itej.ltal (w/attacb) ---------------------------------------------------------------- tbe attached list of .ervices raDge from 1-1/2" to a. ..ter installations. AI stated before in tbe .ellO of Januar, 17, 1990, tber reflect quite a range of actual labor, .ateria1s and equipaent rental; bence, tbe total co.t r.fl.cts the.. variation.. the percentage. of 10s. vary from 5' to 1951. Tb. cost of installations of tb. various service. is a. follows: II-HooaK I'rIJDY CUUIIt -'- I1JI DEI LOW COSt' RIGII COSt' AVlUGI C08t' UCOlOlDDD C08t' * 51 *12 *12 **12 6 9 1-1/2" Doll. 2" Doll. 3" Doll. ." Doll. 6" Doll. a" Doll. . 570.67 '2,850.1a '1,217.01' 800.00 '1,320.55 '2,562.71 '1,870..0 'l,a.O.Oo '2,601.3. '7,360.82 '.,615.90 '3,275.00 - Depoait OIllr - - Deposit OIllr - - Depo.it OIlI, - 11,200.00 11,870.00 .. 615.00 Co.t + 10' Co.t + 101 Coat + 101 tb. surve, of tbe surrounding ala ci Ue. could not . utlli&ed iD our stud, a. tbeir costs varied to include a facUity, acqubit1OD, or other cbarge witb a "..ter-.et" charge, plus tbe developer cODDects into the ..ill an4 tie. into tbe aeter. · the .tUllr includes services instaUe4 anel bUled witbiD a two-,ear . periocS: ** Tbe ." s.rvices vere fire service.. there have .en'DO .. dOllest1c .ervice. installed in tbe past four ,ean. lincerel, , #~~Z~ Shir1e, I'JCbaovsU Water O~llit, !D9iDeer lLe:e9 Attachments (9) "Of o 0 EXHIBIT -B- o San Bernardino Municipal Water Department 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California NEW SERVICE INSTALLATION CHARGES RULE AND REGULATION NO. 5 Water services will be installed to the property line of property located within the confines of the City of San Bernardino served by this Department, upon application to the Departlllent by the property owner, or his authorized agent, and the subsequent paYlllent in advance of the established charges, providing that said property to be served fronts on or is adjacent to a pUblic roadway or right- of-way wherein the Department maintains a standard domestic water line of sufficient size and capacity, and further provided that said service shall conform to all rules and regulations established by the Department. Where a regular charge has been fixed for the type of service connection desired, such regular charge shall be paid in advance by the applicant. Where there is no regular charge, the applicant shall deposit an amount equal to the estimated cost of such service connection at the time of application. The schedule of regular service connection charges is as follows: INSTALLATION COST *mrIMPROVZD SIZE OF DEPOSIT STREET 15/8" SERVICE ~ REOUIRED 'l'O 1" on y 5/8" I 3/4" I 520.00 I 380.00 3/4" I 3/4" 545.00 400.00 1" 585.00 450.00 1-1/2" 1,200.00 2" 1,870.00 3" 4,615.00 4" Cost + 10' I 6,000.00 6" Cost + 10' 7,500.00 8" Cost + 10' 15,000.00 10" Cost + 10' 20,000.00 DEPOSIT FIRE SERVICE .~ REOUIRED 2" Fire Cost + 10' I 2,000.00 4" Fire Cost + 10' 6,000.00 6" Fire Coat + 10' 7,500.00 8" Fire Cost + 10' 15,000.00 10" Fire Cost + 10' 20,000.00 .. 0 f o o o * Unimproved street cost is defined as meter service installations in new unpaved subdivisions when the Department is installing mains and services. Domestic, commercial, and industrial services larger than 3" shall require a deposit and will be installed at cost plus lOt. Fire service connections shall require a deposit and will be installed at cost plus lOt. In addition to the above charges for the installation of new service and fire connections, each applicant for service shall first comply with the provisions set forth and make payment in accordance with Rule and Regulation No. 20. APPROVED: December 18, 1990 EFFECTIVE: February 1, 1991