HomeMy WebLinkAbout48-Public Works
-
nIL.
.tb
-
o
CITY OF MN._RNARDINO
Orom:
File Roq'.667
- .R.QuaST FOR .
ACTION
Dept:
Authorization to Execute Agree-
REC'D.-AOMlItl_. ment for Professional Design
Services - Rehabilitation of
Public Works/Engineering l!I89 KAY 32 11M II: 16Waterman Avenue, from Mill Street
to 5th'Street - A.S.L. Consulting
5-25-89 Engineers
fl-
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Date:
Syhopsis of Previous Council action:
June, 1988 -- 1988-89 Street Construction Fund Budget adopted
appropriating $100,000 (FAU Funds - $86,000 &
City Funds $14,000) for preliminary
engineering.
Recommehded motion:
c:J Adopt resolution.
cc: Jim Robbins
Jim Richardson
Jim Penman
Andy Green
Contact person:
Gene R. Klatt
Staff Report,
Resolution & Aqreement
Phone:
5125
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: $111.229.99
Ward:
\bO.400
.
1
SuppOrting date attached:
Source: (Acct. No.1
242-362-57667
to 5th Street.
Finance:
Avenue
rJvJ-J
Mill
1JJ.IL
Street
(Acct. DescriDtion) Waterman
Oouncil Notes:
75.0262
Agenda Item No-1~
. CITY of sAN'8dMlADINO- RIIQUBST FQ COUNCIL ACTION
o
o
o
.,"'_tlo.AA
STAFF REPORT
~
Page 1 01; 2
Federal-Aid Urban Funds were allocated on a priority
basis for reg-ional projeatsnominated by dcaqe.ncies in the East
Valley area.
The rehabilitation of Waterman Avenue, from Mill street
to Fifth Street, rec~'i1ved a suffioiently' hi'g11 ratih~"'t6'he
eligible for Federal-Aid Urban Funds to fina.nce'86% of the tot;al
estimated cost of $1~'25jll,000.'"
Requests for letters of interest were sent; on 9-8-88 to
21 civil e"1g~n,eering firms, in the City of San Bernardino and
vicinity."~ requests were for professional engineering
se1:vices,~ piepa,r'e" it;h~ necessary plans, specifications and
estimate",' "C_' , ;.
, , . r /
Te~"-rett~rs of' interest were received in response to
this request. These tetters were reviewed on 10-04;"99 by a
committee comprised of the following:
1. Ken Miller - Director of Transportation/Flood
Control ,
2. Richard Bennecke - Executive Assistant to Mayor
3. Phil Arviso - Executive Assistant to Council
4. Fred Wilson - Assistant to the Ci ty Adtninistt~t!or' 'i'
5. Gene Klatt - Assistant; City Engineer "','
6. Roger Hardgrave - Director of Public Works
After carefully reviewing the letters of interest, the
committee selected the following firms to receive' ReqUests for
Proposals:
1. Willdan Associates
2. DMJM
3. ASL Consulting Engineering
4. CM Engineering Associates
The proposals from ,these four 'firms were reviewed on 1-
5-89, by a committee comprised of 'the followin<;r:'"
. ,J(ll',:ll fl:JUli\<; .',,'..
1. Councilwoman Esther Estrada
2.' Lou Gamache , County of San Bernardino'
3. Fred WillllG)Jl"r,A$sistant; to the City Adtninistrator,
4; I, Gene Klatt
5 . 'Roger Ha:rdgra.ve ' .' ,"
The committee concltldeibafter a. -'careful,,~valu.ati:on ,o.f
thesef~rms' " experienoe' and capabilities, that:t:he, firrnof
A.S.L., Consulting Engineers was the best qualified to provide
W d~M~tOOf~n~a~ mtlOWCNlI!III NIfS :.10 ,A
~', ""',l// \ i : J(.. '!
5-25''': a',f.v
- CITY OF SAN BBRrAlDINO - R.QUIIST .Q,. COUNCIL ACTION
c
STAFF REPORT
Page 2 of 2
All Agreement for Professional Services was accordingly
negotiated with the selected firm. The agreement provides, in
general, that. A.S.L. Consulting Enqineers will prepare the
plans, specifications and estimate required to construct the
project. This document has been reviewed and approved by
Caltrans, as required for Federal-Aid Urban Funds.
Under terms of this agreement, the Consultant would
receive a fee not to exceed $111,228.00.
An amount of $100,000 has been allocated, under Account
No. 242-362-57667, to finance preliminary engineering costS.
Supplemental funds in the amount of $11,228 will be included in
the 1989-90 Street Construction Fund Budget.
We recommend that the agreement be approved.
o
c
5-25-89
75.0264
o
o
o
15
16
17
18
19
20
2]
22
23
24
25
26
27
5/25/89 28
o
o
]
RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO' AUTflORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SE:R,VICES WITH. A.S.L.
3 CONSULTING ENGItlEERS RELATING TO THE ENGINEE:R.XNG DESIGN FOR
REHABILITATION OF WATERMAN AVENUE, FROM MILL ST:R.EET TO FIFTH
4 STREET.
5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
6
7
8
9
10
11
SECTJ:ON 1. The Mayor of the City of San Bernardino is
hereby authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of said
City, an agreement with A.S.L. Consulting Engineers, relating to
the engineering design
for rehabilitation of Waterman Avenue,
from Mill Street to 5th Street, a copy of which agreement is
attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by
12
reference as fully as. though set forth at length.
13
14
SECTION 2.
The agreement shall not take effect until
fully signed and executed by both parties. The City shall not be
obligated hereunder unless and until the. agreement is fully
xecuted and no oral agreement relating thereto shall be implied
r authorized.
.
SECTION 3. This resolution is rescinded if the parties
o the agreement fail to execute it within sixty (60) days of the
assage of this resolution.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing re,solution was duly
dopted by. the Mayor and Common Council of. the City of San
ernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the
ay of , 1989, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Council Members
NAYS:
o
o
o
ABSENT:
o
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
, 1989.
9
. 10 Approved as to form
and leqalcontent:
11
James F. Penman
12 City Attorney
:: BY~'l..-j.~,
U'
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
.25
26
27
5/25/89 28
15
16
- 2 -
w. R. aolcomb, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
o
o
c
WHEREAS, City desires to obtain professional services to prepare plans,
specifications, and estimates, to construct improvements and to rehabilitate
Waterman Avenue between Mi 11 Street and Fi fth Street. The project wi 11
provide for improvements to the existing roadway, removal of median islands
and signals, widening of the west side of Waterman Avenue between. Third Street
and Fourth Street to provide for 3-1anes of traffic in each direction. The
. project will also include the upgrade of signals to provide left-turn phase
and possible interconnection, widening of the Warm Creek Bridge channel
crossing, providing for double left-turn lanes, relocation or adjustment of"
e~isttng utilities, pavement rehabilitation Or reconstruction, signing and
striping; and,
!
o WHEREAS, in order to develop such plans,specifications and estimates,
it is necessary to retain the professional services of a qualified engineering
and consulting firm; and
WHEREAS, Engineer is qualified to provide said professional services;
and
WHEREAS, San BernardinO City ClIuncil has elected tll engage the services
of Engineer upon the terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed, as follows;
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Engineer shall perform those services specified in, "Scope of Services" ,
a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "I" and incorpQratedas though
set forth in full.
o
2. TERM OF ~GREEMENT
The services of Engineer are to comence within thirty (30) days after
the City has authorized work to start by issuance of a Notice to Proceed. The
scheduled completion dates specifically set forth in.Exhibit "2" attached
hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, will be adjusted
by Engineer as the City.authorizes the wllrk. Such adjustments shall require
City approval prior to commeneement of performance lIfeach phase. ,This
Agreement shall expire as specified by the Exhibit "2" schedule, unless
extended by written Agreellll!nt of the parties. . .
I , ."
,\
I
o
o
o
,~~~ 3. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE
Engineer shall complete all work product and design in conformance with
Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Drawings, City of San
Bernardino's Standard Drawings and San Bernardino County Flood Control
District Standards.
4. CHANGES/EXTRA SERVICES
A. Performance of the work specified in the "Scope of Services" is made
an obligation of Engineer under this Agreement, subject to any changes made
sUbsequently upon mutual agreement of the parties. All such changes shall be
incorporated by written alnendments to this Agreement and shall in.clude any
increase or decrease 1n the amount of compensation due Engineer for the change
in scope. Any change which has not been so incorporated shall not be binding
on either party.
B. No extra services shall be rendered by Engineer under this Agreement
unless such extra serVices are authorized, in writing, by City prior to
performante of such work. Authorized extra services shall be invoiced based'
on Engineer's "Schedule. of Hourly Rates. dated 1989, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "7" and incorporated herein as though set forth in
full. .
5. COMPENSATION
o
c
A. The City shall reimburse the Engineer for actual costs (including
labor costs, employee benefits, overhead, profit, other direct and indirect
costs) incurred by the Engineer in performance of the work, in III amount not
to exceed $111,228.00, as set forth in Exhibit "3", attached hereto,
consisting of actual costs of $98,615.46 togetherwitha.fixed. fee .of
$12,612.54. Actual costs shall not exceed the estimated wage rates and other
costs as set forth in Exhibits "4", "5" and "6" attached hereto and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full. .
B. . Said compl!nsation shall not be altered unless there is. significant
alteration in. the scope, complexity or character of the work to be performed.
Any such significant aaeration shall be agreed upon in writing by City and
Engineer before commencement of performance of such signifit'ant alteratIon by
Engineer. .
Any adjustment of the total cost of Services w1ll only be permitted when
the Engineer establishes and City has agreed, in writing, that there has been,
or is to be, a significant change in:
1. Scope, complexity, or character of the services to be
performed; or
2.
Conditions under which the work is required to. be performed;
or .
2
o
o
c
o
o
3. Duration of work if the change from the time period
specified in the Agreement for completion of the work
warrants such adjustment.
C. Federal Acquisition Regulation, Title 4aCFR, Chapter I, Subpart 31
shall control allowable elements of cost for contracts with commercial
organ 1 zations.
D. The Engineer is required to comply with all Federal, State and
local laws and ordinances app1 icab1e to the work. . The Engineer is required to
comply with prevailing wage rates in accordance with California Labor Code
Section 1775.
6. PAYMENT B~ CITY
A. The billings for all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement
shall be submitted mOnthly by Engineer to City and shall be paid by City
within twenty (20) days after receipt of same, excepting any ainOunts disputed
by City. Dispute over any invoiced amount shall be noticed to the Ellgineer.
within five (5) days of billing and a meet and confer meeting for purposes of
resolution of such dispute shall be initiated by the City within fiVe (5) days
of notice of such dispute. Interest of 1-1/2 percent per month (but not
exceeding the maximum rate allowable by law) wmbe payable on any ,amounts
not in dispute and not Paid within ,thirty (30) days of the billing date,
payment thereafter to be applied first to accrued interest and then to the
principal unpaid amount. On disputed amounts, interest shall accrue from
thirty (30) days of the invoice date if the amount in dispute is resolved in
favor of the Engineer. All tasks as specified in Exhibit "1" shall be
completed prior to final payment.
B. Should 1 itigation be necessary to enforce any term or provision of
this Agreement, or to collect any portion of th.e amount payable under this
Agreement, then all litigation and collection expenses, witness. fees, and
court costs, and attorney's fees shall be paid to the prevail ingparty.
7. SUPERVISION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SERVIC~S
The Director of Public Works of City, or his designee, shall havE! the
right of general supervision over ,all work performed by Engineer and shall be
City's agent with respect to obtaining Engineer's compliance hereunder. No
payment for any services rendered under this Agreement shall be made without
Prior approval of the Director of Public Works or his designee. .
a.COMPLIANCE WITH ~IVIL RIGHTS LAWS
. .. Engineer hereby certifies that it will not discriminate against any
emplOyee or applicant fqr employment because of race,co10r, religion, sex,
marital status or national origin. Engineer shall promote affirmative action
in its hiring practices. and employee pol icies for minorities .and other
designatedc1 asses in accordanc,e with Federal, State and 10ca.l laws. Such
action shall include, but not belim.ited to, the following: Recruitlllentind
recruitment advertising, employment upgrading, and promotion. .Inaddition,
3
o
o
o
o
Engineer shall not exclude from participation under thhAgreement any
employee or applicant for employment on the basis of age, handicap or rel igion
in cOMpliance with State and Federal laws.
9. TERMlNATION OF AGREEMENT
A. This agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30)
days' written notice in the event of substantial failure of the other party to
perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Each party shall have
twenty (20) days following date of such notice within which to correct the
substantial failure giving rise to such notice. In the event of termination
of'this Agreement, City shall within thirty (30) days pay Engineer for all the
fees, charges and services performed to City's satisfaction by Engineer, which
finding of satisfaction shall not be unreasonably withheld. Engineer hereby
covenants and agrees that upon termination of this Agreement for any reason,
Engineer will preserve and make immediately available to City, or its
designated representatives, maps, notes, correspondence, or records ,related to
work paid for by the City and required for its timely completion, and to fully
cooperate with City so that the ,",ork to be accomplished under th,isAgreement
may continue within forty-five (45) days of termination. Any subsequent use'
of such incomplete documents shall be at the sole risk of the City and the
City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Engineer from any claims, losses..
costs, including Attorney's fees, and 1 iabil ity arising out of such use:
Engineer shall be compensated for such services in accordance with Exhibit
"7".
B. This agreement may be terminated for the convenience of the City
upon thirty (30) days written notice to E~gineer. Upon suchnotice,Engineer
shall provide work product tp City and Cltyshall compensate Engineer in the
manner set forth above.
C. Following the effective date of termination of this,Agreement
pursuant to this section, the Agreement shall continue until all obligations
arising from such termination are satisfied.
10. CONTINGENCIES
In the event that, due to causes beyond the control of and without'the
faultornegl igence of Engineer, Engineer fail sto meet any of its obligations
under this Agreement, and such failure shall not constitute, a default in
performance, and the City may grant to Engineer such extens.ions of time and
make other arrangements or additions, excepting any increase il! payment, as
may be reasonable under the circulllstances. Increases in payment shall be made
only under the .changes. provision of this Agreement. Engineer shall notify
City within ten (10) days in writing when it becomes aware of any event or
circumstance for which it claims or may claim an extension.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
c
A. Engineer shall act as an independent contractor in the performance
of the services provided fQr under this Agreement. Engineer shall furnish
such services in its own manner and in no respect shall it be considered an
agent or employee of City.
4
o
o
o
B. Any document or written report prepared for or under the direction
of a state or local agency, whiCh is prepared in whole or in part by
nonemployees of such agency, shall contain the numbers and dollar amounts of
all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of such document or
written report; provided, however, that the total cost for work performed by
nonemployees of the agency exceeds five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). The
contract and subcontract numbers and dollar amounts. shall be contained in a
separate section of such document or written report.
12.. ASSIGNf1ENT OR SUBCONTRACTING
Neither this Agreement, nor any portion thereof, may be assigned by
Engineer without the written consent of City. Any attempt by Engineer to
assign or subcontract any performance of this Agreement without the written
consent of the City shall be null and void and shall constitute a breach of
this agreement. All subcontracts exceeding $10,000, shall contain all
provisions of this contract.
13. NOTICES
All official notices relative to this Agreement shall be in writing and
addressed to the following representatives of Engineer and City:. :
o
ENGINEER
Mr. William D. Lewis,
President
ASL Consulting Engineers
10350 Commerce Center Drive,
Suite 180
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
illY
Jolr. Roger C. Hardgrave,
Director of Public Works,
City Engineer
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA ~2418
c
14. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTIES
A. The Engineer may reasonably rely upon the accuracy Of data provided
through the City or its agents without independent evaluation.
B.All tracings, survey notes, and other original documents are
instruments of service and shall remain the property of Engilleer except where
by law,precedent, or agreement these documents become public property. All
such documents or records shall be. made accessible to the City. T.he engineer
shall maintain all records for inspection by. the City, State, or their duly
autborized representatives for a period of three (3) years after final
payment. . The Engineer shall stamp and s'ign all. specifications, estimates,
plans and engineering data furnished, and, where appropriate, indicate
registration number.
15. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
A. Any opinion of the Construction Cost prepared by Engineer represents
his judgment as a.. design professional and is supplied for the general guidance
of the City. Since Engineer has no control over the cost of 1 abor and
5
o
o
o
mlterill, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Engineer does not
gUlrantee the accuracy of such opinions as compared to contractor bids or
actual cost to the City.
B. If a Construction Cost limit is established by written agreement
between City and Engineer and is specifically set forth in a mutullly agreed
addendum to this Agreement, the following will apply:
1. The acceptance by City at any time during the services of a
revised opinion of Construction Cost in excess of the then
established cost limit will constitute a corresponding revision in
the Construction Cost limit to the extent indicated in such
revised opinion.
2. Any Construction Cost 1 imit so establ ished will include a
contingency of ten percent (10%) unless another amount is agreed
upon in writi~g.
3. Engineer will be permitted to determine what types of materials,
equipment and component systems are to be included in the Drawings.
and Speci ficat ions and to make reasonabl e adjustments in the
general scope, extent and character of the project to bring i~
within the cost limit. .
If the bidding or negotiating phase hlS not commenced within six
(6) months after completion of the final Design Phase, the
established Construction Cost limit will not be binding on
Engineer, and City shall consent to an adjustment in suthcost
limit cOlllllensurlte with any applicable change in the general .level
of prices in the construction industry between the date of
completion of the Final Design Phase and the date on which
proposals or bids are sought.
o
4.
c
5.
If the lowest bona fide proposal or bid exceeds the established
Engineer's Construction Cost Estimate by twenty percent (20%)or
more, City shall (1) give written approval to increase such cost
1 imits, (2) authorize negotiating or rebidding th.e Project within
a - reasonable time, or (3) cooperate in revising the Pr.oject's
general scope, extent or character to the _extentcc)nsistent with
the Project's requirements and with sound-engineering practice.
In the case of (3), Engineer shall modify the Contract Documents
as necessary to bring the Construction Cost within the cost limit.
In lieu of other compensation for services in making such
modifications, City shall pay Engineer, Engineer's cost of such
services, all overhead expenseS lnd reimbursable expenses
reasonably related thereto, but not includina Drofit, olr account
of such services. The providing of such Service will _be the limit
of Engineer's responsibility in this regard and, having done so,
Engineer shall be entitled to payment for services inaccordlnce
with this Agreement and will not otherwise be liable for damages
attributable to the lowest bona fide proposal or bid exceeding the
established Construction Cost.
6
o
o
c
o
o
I.
1
,
16. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEE
1
Engineer warrants that no person or selling agency has been em~loyed or
retained to sol icit or secure this Agreement upon an agreement or
understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee,
excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercialor,sel1ing
agencies maintained by the engineer for the purpose of securing busin~ss. For
breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the tight to
terminate this Agreement in accordance with the clause permitting termination
for cause and, at its sole discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or
consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission,
percentage, brokerage or contingent fee.
17. HOLD HARMLESS CLA~SE
Engineer hereby agrees to hold City, its elective and appointive boards,
officerS, and employees, harmless from liability for damage or claims for
damage for personal injury including death, as well as from claims for
property damage, which mayari se from Engineer's negl igent acts, errors or
omissions under this Agreement.
18. INDEM~ITV
~
Engineer agrees to indemnify, pay for cost of defense and hold'harmless
City from and against claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments,
losses, damages, injuries, penalties, costs, expenses and li~bilities, which
arise solely from Engineer's negligent performance of services under this
Agreement. Engineer shall not be responSible for, and City shallipdemnify,
defend and hold harmless Engineer from and against, any and all .claims,
demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments, losses, damages, injuries,
penalties, costs, expenses and liabilities of, by or with respect to third
parties, which arise solely from the City's negligence. Wi.th respect to
claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments, losses,!damages,
injuries, penalties, costs, expenses and 1 iabll ities, which .ll'ise from the
joint or concurrent negligence of Engineer and City, each party shall assume
responsibil ity in proportion to the degree of its respective fauH. .
I
19.
LIABlLITV/INSURAN~E
A. Engineers' liability to the City for injury or damage to persons or
property arising out of work performed by the City and for which legal
liabil ity may be found to rest upon Engineer other thanfo.rprofessional
errors and omissions, will be limited to $1,000,000. . For any damage on
account of any error, C)mi ss i on or other profess i ona 1 negl igence. Ergi neer' s
liability, will be limited to a sum not to exceed $50,000 or Engineer's fee,
whichever is lessor. .
B. The City will require the Engineer to provide Workers Compensation
and comprehens i vegenera 1 1 iabili ty insurance, i ncl udi ngcompleted operations
and contractual 11 abil ity, with coverage sufficient to insure the Engineer's
indemnity, as above requir!ld; ~nd, such insurance ~ill include the ,City, the
Engineer, their consultants, and each of th!lirofficers, agents and employees
as additional insureds.
7
c
o
c
o
o
C. Engineer shall provide evidence of insurance in. the form of a
certificate of insurance, in which the City is named as an additional named
insured to the extent of the coverage required by this Agreement. This
requirement does not apply to p~ofessional liability coverage.
.20. VALIDITY
Should any provision herein be found or deemed to be invalid, this
Agreement shall be construed as not containing such provision,and all other
J)rovisions which are otherwise lawful shall remain in full force and effect,
and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are declared to be severable.
21. ENTIR~ AGREEMENT
This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between
the parties hereto and supercedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations,
representations, understandings and agreements, whether written or oral, with
respect to the subject matter thereof. This Agreement may be amended only by
written instrument signed by both parties. .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed on the date written above by their duly authorized officers on their
behalf.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
a municipal corporation
ATTEST:
BY:
W. R. Holcomb, Mayor
City Clerk
ASl Consulting Engineers
BY:
William D. lewis, President
Approved as to form
and legal content:
8
o
o
o
o
o
EXHIBIT 1
SCOPE OF WORK
A multi-task work program has been developed to accomplish the Project
objectives. Each task describes a work element required for the preparation
of the final contract plans, specifications and estimates and is described in
more deta i 1 in the fo 11 owing sect ions.
Task 1 - Data Assembly
Initial data collection and preliminary studies required for the design will
be developed concurrently. The data will be used for roadway design, bridge
design, traffic analysis and for the hydrology/hydraulic analysis. A detailed
description of the work elements included in Task 1 - Data Assembly, are
described below.
A. Data Collection - Available data, plans and information pertaining to
the project will be collected and reviewed. Existing maps, the as-buil~
. improvement plans for Waterman Avenue, The Town Creek Channel and'
Bridge, adjacent street plans, survey records, existing traffic studies,
soils and foundation reports, utility information, tract maps, property
records, and other information and reports in City files will be
collected.
B. Project Coordination -
1. A meeting will be held with City staff, Caltrans Project
Development, San Bernardino County Flood Control District, (Flo04
Control) and other affected agencies. The purpose of the meeting
will be to review the project, identify procedures to lie followed
in the processing of the project documents through Caltrans, Flood
Control, and to finalize the Project Schedule. '
2. A field site review will be made with City Staff to identify
specific problems.
C'. Field Surveys - Field surveys will be performed. Field surveys will be
tied to existing control south of Mill Street to assure full
compatibility of the designs.
1. A records search wi 11 be made to assembl e existing survey and
monumentation data from the City of San Bernardino and Flood
Control files.
o
o
c
EXHIBIT 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Cont.)
2. Site benchmarks will be located and ground control points will be
established.
D.
,
I
3. Centerline controls and stationing will be established for
Waterman Avenue, Town Creek Channel and ties to all cross streets.
4. Cross-sections, topography and elevations will be provided, as
necessary, to verify existing drainage and utility interferences.
Pavement and bridge structure join lines will be precisely defined
to record the condition of the project site prior to construction.
5. The survey notes will fully describe all reference pOints and the
bench marks used will be referenced.
6. A complete set of all survey notes will be submitted to the City.
Aerial Topographic Surveys - Aerial surveys will be obtained within the
project limits. The aerial survey will consist of controlled aerial
topographic strip mapping along Waterman Avenue. Mylar base sheets wil~
be developed and a Cad compatible disk will be furnished for use in
preparation of the contract plans.
E. Soils Investigation - A soils and foundation investigation will be made.
The soils investigation for the design south of Mill Street will be
reviewed. The foundation investigation will supplement the previous
investigation and will include testing and evaluation of soils in
connection with the design of the roadway improvements, pavement
structure design, embankment fill construction and for the bridge
foundation.
o
1. The existing soil and pavements will be tested and evaluated to
'determine recommendations for pavement structural sections and for
embankment construction.
2. The previous soil s report and bori ng logs for ,the, Town Creek
Bridge will be reviewed. Supplemental borings and foundation
investigations will be made to develop foundation recommendations
for the Bridge widening. '
3. The soils report, which includes the soils and bridge foundation
recommendations, will be submitted to the City, Caltrans and Flood
Control for review and approval.
Field Traffic Counts - Field counts, reports and graphs will be prepared
for the four intersections between Mill Street and Fifth, Street for A.M.
F.
o
o
c
c
o
o
EXHIBIT 1 .
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Cont.)
and P.M. peak hour turning movements. Pedestrian counts will be taken
at 15 minute intervals for volume and movements. Special studies will
be conducted to provide for speedproflles, and on-street parking
surveys.
G. Utility Coordination - Utility research will be conducted. Coordination
will be maintained with each utility owner to determine the requirements
for utilities in the project area, identify conflicts and to develop
recommendations for the protection, relocation, or undergrounding of
each affected utility.
Task 2 - Design Criteria Report
A Design Criteria Report will be prepared and submitted for .review and
comment. The report will include a summary of the initial studies and"
findings. The report will include the preliminary alignment plan, proposed
street typical section and pavement structural section, the bridge typ~
selection study and loading requirements.
A. A geometric alignment plan will be prepared. The geometric plan will
show alignments, cross-sections and other geometric characteristics of
the street and bridge improvements. The geometric plan will be
submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and Flood Control on the
major geometric concept.
B. Abridge/type selection study and loading summary will be prepared to
establish the most appropriate bridge widening alternative within the
parameters of economy, practicality, and aesthetics.
A conceptual plan and section will be prepared showing the recommended
bridge widening. The plan and section will be included in the Design
Criteria Report for submittal to Caltrans, Office of Structures Design,
and Flood Control.
C. An initial traffic analysis will be made to establ.ish A.~. and P.M. peak
hour traffic volumes and turning movements. The purpose of the analysis
will be to assess the need for double left-turn lanes and storage
requirements. The analysis will also serve to establ ish a foundation
for the ultimate intersection and signal design.
c
o
o
EXHIBIT 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Cont.)
D. Area hydrology will be reviewed to establish drainage flows tributary
to various collection points along the existing roadway. The drainage
analysis will provide a basis for designing necessary drainage
facil ities to intercept and conduct the existing and ultimate drainage
flows to an adequate discharge outlet.
E. The "Design Criteria Report" will be submitted to Caltrans, Flood
Control, and the City for review and conrnent. Revi sions will be made,
as necessary, within the intended scope, until the Design Criteria
Report is acceptable.
Task 3 - Preli.inary Design
The data and survey information assembled during the preparation of the Design.
Criteria Report will be utilized to compile the necessary database required
for the design of the Waterman Avenue widening project.
o
A.
o
Preliminary drawings will be prepared showing plan view and. details of
the proposed improvemen.ts for the total project based on the concepts
and criteria approved in the. "Design Criteria Report". Typical sections
will be prepared showing pavement widths, structural sections, sidewalks
and slopes, for both the street and for the bridge widening. Channel
water surface profiles will be developed, showing structure. interim and
final underclearances. Existing util ity locations will bepl otted and
conflicts will be noted as well as requirements for relocation,
adjustments and modifications. Hydrology/hydraulic calculations will be
developed. A preliminary estimate of quantities will be made and a
construction cost estimate will be developed, based on anticipated unit
prices. These plans and design documents will be submitted to the City,
Caltrans and Flood Control for concurrence along with all pertinent
des i gn correspondence i ncl udi ng responses from ut il it ies and other
affected agencies.
The preliminary plans will be submitted to
companies for verification of their hcil ities.
letters will be forwarded to the City.
C. A traffic control study will be conducted to determine requirements for
detours, prior notice signing, barricades and delineators. Temporary
rea 1 ignment pl ans will be prepared for Waterman Avenue. The traffi c
control study will be submitted for City and Caltrans review and
comment.
B.
all affected utility
Copies of transmittal
o
o
o
EXHIBIT I
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Cont.)
D. Traffic signing, striping and stage construction plans will be prepared.
The stage construction plan will show how existing traffic will be
handled on Waterman Avenue during falsework erection and during street
construction to minimize impacts.
Task 4 - Final Design
Final design and contract plan preparation will be undertaken upon approval of
the concept and geometric studies, the conceptual bridge plan; and traffic
plans undertaken in the preliminary design phase. Contract plans and
specifications will be prepared in accordance with the Caltrans Highway Design
Manual and Standard Specifications. City standards and Flood Control
standards and requirements will be incorporated, as appropriate.
A.
o
c
The final roadway design and pavement rehabil itation includes widening
of Waterman Avenue to three (3) traveled lanes in each direction, median.
island mod Hi cat ions and roadway pavement rehabil i tat i on or
reconstruction. The roadway design will include the hori.zontal and
vertical control, street geom~tric design, drainage facU ities and
related roadway facH ities including adjustment to valve boxes and
manholes. . The design effort will include the following:
1. Finalize the geometric design.
2. Establish necessary drainage facilities.
3. Complete preparation of the contract Plans.
4. Develop and finalize the street cross-sections.
B. Final designs will be developed for traffic control in accordance with
the Caltrans Traffic Manual. Design effort will include the following
work elements:
1. Traffic handl ing plans to provide for traffic flow on Waterman
Avenue during construction.
2. Final signing and striping plans for Waterman Avenue. Existing
signs, to be relocated or removed, will be identified.
3.
Traffic signal plans will be prepared for the relocation or
replacement of signal standards, lights and arms, detection and
interconnect ion equi pment. Contract Pl ans wi 11 provide for new
controllers, if necessary.
c
o
c
o
o
EXHIBIT 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Cont.)
C. Final design will be developed for the bridge widening and channel
lining replacement, if required, and will conform to Caltrans and Flood
Control design requirements. The final design will incorporate agency
review comments from the prel imi nary design phase. Structural
calculations will be prepared. An analysis will be made to match
deflections between the existing and proposed structure.
D. Notices and copies of final plans win be submitted to affected
utilities to identify the magnitude of required relocations and to
schedule further coordination requirements.
E. Construction drawings based on the final design efforts will result in
the following summary of plan sheets. The precise number, titles, and
content of sheets may vary slightly due to unforeseen conditions
identified in the design process.
Title sheet
Standard Plans list
Typical Cross-Sections
Plan & Profile Sheets
Contour Grading Plan
Miscellaneous Details
Stage Construction Plans
Pavement Delineation & Signing Plans
Signal Plans
Structure Plans
1
1
1
6
1
1
3
4
~
,
3.
ESTIMATED SHEET TOTAL 29
I.
o
o
o
EXHIBIT 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Cont.)
J. The final Plans, four (4) copies of the final Specifications document,
and Cost Estimate, will be submitted to the City, Flood Control, and
Caltrans.
K. Revisions will. be made to the Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate,
within the approved concept, until final approval is obtained from the
City, Flood Control, and Caltrans.
L. Notices and approved project plans will be submitted to affected utility
agencies prior to project bidding. The notice will request immediate
relocation or relocation/coordination compatibility with the
construction schedule, as necessary.
M. Contact will be maintained with Caltrans and Flood Control, as
necessary, to assist the City in expediting the review and approval
process for the construction bidding.
N.
Final Plans, Specifications
the City for advertising.
items listed below:
and related documents will be submitted to
Final document submittal will include tht
o
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
All geometric and structural calculations.
A final itemized construction cost estimate and all back-up
and supporting materials.
Work copies of all profiles and cross-sections;
Hydrology/hydraulic design calculations.
All design correspondence and correspondence. with utilities
and other affected agencies.
Task 5 - Easement Acquisition
A. Property Ownerships will be shown on the plan and profile sheets based
on. information available from the City and County of San Bernardino
records. Properties affected by the construction will be determined and
included as necessary.
B. Legal descriptions and property sketches, for slope, drainage, util ity
and for construction easement areas, if required for the project, will
be prepared for execution by the City.
C. Engineering consultation will be provided to the City during the
easement acquisition process, as necessary.
o
J
c
o
o
EXHIBIT 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Cont.)
Task 6 - Coordination and Permits
1. CITY STAFF. MEETINGS. Bi-weekly meetings will be held to review project
status, task completion, concerns and upcoming deadlines. Special topic
meetings will be held, as necessary, to review and discuss special
issues on an as needed basis.
2. CALTRANS. Contact will be made with staff at key milestones to determine
design and plan requirements. Preliminary and final plans and
specifications will be submitted for comment and approval.
3. FLOOD CONTROL. Contact will be made with staff to determine design and
plan requirements related to the Town Creek. Channel and lining
modifications, storm drain access and for the bridge widening.
4.
o
c
UTILITY NOTIFICATIONS. Utilities will be informed of the project and
potential conflicts and impacts on their facilities. Four utility
notices will serve to advise them of the project, identify conflicts~
handle coordination requirements and to keep them informed of project
schedules and facility requirements. Prior to project bidding, notices
and approved project plans will be transmitted to all affected agencies
requesting immediate relocation, installation or coordination
compatibility with the proposed construction schedule.
S. TOWN CREEK PERMIT. A storm drain access and channel modification permit
will be prepared for submission to Flood Control. The. permit is
required for the bridge widening and for storm drain connection
requirements.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION. The environmental review will serve
to identify potential environmental liabilities and. to recommend
measures for mitigating adverse impacts. A request for a FONSI will be
prepared and sent to the City for further processing.
7. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT MEETING. A meeting will be held for all interested
parties to provide input to the project prior to the preparation of the
preliminary plans. The meeting will be focused on specifics related to
design and access issues.
PROJECT STATUS MEETING. An informal meeting will be he)d to provide
property owners and interested parties wUh the opportunUy to review
the project plans. The meeting will be held on a mutually acceptable
date near the time of completion of the final design when the proposed
improvements are well defined.
8.
o
o
o
EXHIBIT 1
SCOPE OF SERVICES (Cont.)
The Scope of Services listed above is based on the following assumptions:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
0
7.
c
1. The City will provide reproducible copies of all available mapping,
reports, studies, aerial photos, plans and other documents in its files
which may assist in the preparation of the various reports and plans.
Attendance at a bridge-type selection review meeting, in Sacramento,
will not be required.
New or additional right-of-way and property acquisitions will not be
required.
Flood Control will process the permit for Corps of Engineers approval.
Environmental findings and conclusions will be suitable for inclusion as
a part of a request for a finding of no significant impacts. {FONSI).
The preparation and processing of environmental assessments and
documentation will be handled by the City.
All work will be completed prior to January 31, 1990.
o
o
o
EXHIBIT 2
SCHEDULE OF COMPLUIOH ~TES
Task 1 ~OatlAss..1I1Y will be completed within 60calendal; days after Notice
to Proceed.
Task Z - ,Oesigll< C"t~rh Report will be completed within 21 calendar days
after completion of the Task 1 - Data Assembly submittals.
,
Task 3 ~'i'PNlU.inary Designs will be completed within 66 calendar days after
submittal of the Design Criteria Report.
Task 4 - Final Design will be completed within 92 calendar days after
submittaleftlte 'Eask ,3 .Ilnel iminary Design Reports.
Task 5 - Easement Acquisition will be carried out coincidentally, on an as
needed 'basts, with the other items of work.
:
<:) Task 6 - Coordination and Permits will be carried out coincidentally with the
other items of wrk. .
Based on timely reviews by all parties ,a tentative schedule will be as
follows:
Notice to Proceed and Audit ---------- March 21, 1989
Task 1 completion -------------------- May 20, 1989.
Task 2 completion -------------------- June 10, 1989.
Agency Review completion ------------ June 21, 1989
Task 3 completion -------------------- August 29, 1989.
Agency Review completion ------------ September 12, 1989.
Task 4 completion -------------------- December 13, 1989.'
Agency Review completion ------------ January 13, 1990.
<:)
c
o
o
....d.
o
EXHIBIT 3
ENGJNEERING SERVICE FEES
Task 1 - Data Asselbly
Task 2 - Design Criteria Report
Task 3 - Preli.inary Design
Task 4 - Final Design
Task 5 - Easelent Acquisition
Task 6 - Coordination and Per.its
GRAND TOTAL:
o
$ 19,412.00
$ 4,263.00
$ 11,789.00
$ 65,663.00
$ 3,072.00
$ 7,029.00
-----------
$111,228.00
:
o
o
o
o
o
EXHIBIT 4
WATERMAN AVENUE STREET WIDENING
Task 1 - Data Assembly
COST PRICE PROPOSAL
!imlM BAll
DIRECT LABOR
Principal
Managing Engineer
Project Engineer
Transportation Engineer
Registered Engineer
Designer
Draftsperson
Junior Engineer
Word processor
Survey, 3-man crew
o
6
2
2
o
6
o
12
3
32
$ 47.00
32.00
27.00
23.00
20.00
17.00
14.50
11.00
12.00
55.70
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR:
lNDIRECT COSTS (Overhead)
Overhead Rate:
14B.53%
DIRECT COSTS (Except Labor)
A. Automobile Travel
B. Reproduction Expenses
C. Communications
D. CClIIlputer Expense
E. Outside Consultants:
1. Converse Consultants
2. Inland Aerial Surveys
3. Traffic Counts, Inc.
F. Other (Insurance, Surcharge,
Finance charges, and
Processing)
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS:
FEE (profit)
TOTAL COST TASK 1:
$ 15.00
$ 20.00
$ 20.00
$ - 0 -
$ 6,500.00
$ 3,500.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 1,656.48
TOTAL
$ -0-
192.00
54.00
46.00
-0-
102.00
-0-
132.00
36.00
1,782.40
$2,344.40
,
$3,482.14
$12,711.48
$ 873.98
$19,412.00
o
o
c
o
o
EXHIBIT 4
WATERMAN AVENUE STREET WIDENING
Task 2 - Desion Criteria ReDort
COST PRICE PRO~OSAL
HQllM Bm
DIRECT LABOR
Principal
Managing Engineer
Project Engineer
Registered Engineer
Designer
Draftsperson
Wordprocessor
I
12
24
2
16
4
4
$ 47.00
32.00
27.00
20.00
17.00
14.50
12.00
mAL
$ 47.00
348.00
648.00
-0-
272.00
58.00
48.00
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR: $ 1,457.00
---------
INDIRECT COSTS (Overhead)
Overhead Rate:
148.53'
~IRECT COSTS (Except Labor)
A. Automobile Travel
B. Reproduction Expenses
C. COIIlIIIWlications
D. COIIputer Expense
F. Other (Insurance, Surcharge,
Finance charges, and
Processing)
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS:
FEE (prOfit)
TOTAL COST TASK 2
$ 15.00
$ 50.00
$ 10.00
$ 10.00
$ 13.76
$ 2,164.08
,
$ 98.00
$ 543.16
.-----------
$ 4,263.00
o
o
o
1m
o
o
EXHIBIT 4
WATERMAN AVENUE STREET WIDENING
"IRECT LABOR
Principal
Managing Engineer
Project Engineer
Transportation-Engineer
Registered Engineer
Designer
Draftsperson
Word processor
INDIRECT COSTS (Overhead)
Overhead Rate:
148;53%
Task 3 - Preliminary Destgn
DETAILm COST
~ BAll mAL
1 $ 47.00 $ 47.00
22 32.00 704.00
32 27.00 864.00
16 23.00 368.00
0 20.00 -0-
72 17.00 1,224.00
52 14.50 754.00
5 12.00 60.00
---------
TOTAL DIRECT lABOR: $4,021.00
,
$5.972.39
DIRECT COSTS (Except Labor)
A. Automobile Travel
B. Reproduct i on Expenses
C. COIIIIIUnications
D. Computer Expense
F. Other (Insurance, Surcharge,
Finance charges, and
Processing)
$ 30.00
$100.00
$ 30.00
$100.00
$ 36.60
------------
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS:
FEE (prOfit)
TOTAL COST TASK 3:
$ 296.60
$ 1.499.01
----------
$11.789.00
o
o
o
-
o
DIRECT LABOR
Principal
Kanaging Engineer
Project Engineer
.TransportaUon Engineer
Registered Engineer
Designer
Draftsperson
WOrd Processor
Junior Engineer
INDIRECT COSTS (Overhead)
Overhead Rate:
148.5~
o
EXHIBIT 4
WATERMAN AVENUE STREET WIDENING
Tisk 4 - Final Desian
DETAILED COST
HmIBl 8m rnm
24 $ 47.00 $1,128.00
176 32.00 5,632.00
80 27.00 2,160.00
40 23.00 920.00
8 20.00 160.00
180 17.00 3,060.00
600 14.50 8,700.00
32 12.00 384.00
40 11.00 440.00
----------
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR: $22,584.00
:
$33,544.02
DIRECT COSTS (Except Labor)
A. Automobile Travel
B. Reproduction Expenses
C. Communications
D. COIIlputer Expense
F. Other (Insurance, Surcharge,
. Finance charges, and
Processing)
$ 60.00
$775.00
$ 60.00
$ 75.00
$145.78
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS:
FEE (profit)
TOTAL COST TASK 4:
$ 1,115.78
$ 8,419.20
---.----...----
$65,633.00
o
o
o
EXHIBIT 4
WATERMAN AVENUE STREET WIDENING
Task 5 - Easement ACQuisition
DETAllED COST
DIRECT LABOR
Principal
Managing Engineer
Project Engineer
Registered Engineer
Designer
Draftsperson
Word Processor
~ 8m mAl.
-0- $ 47.00 $ -0-
13 32.00 4Ui.00
-0- 27.00 -0-
2 20.00 40.00
22 17.00 374.00
8 14.50 116.00
8 12.00 96.00
--------.-
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR: $1.042.00
INDIRECT COSTS (Overhead}
Overhead Rate:
148.53'
$1,547.68
!
c:> DIRECT COSTS (Except labor)
A. Automobile Travel
B. Reproduction Expenses
C. Communications
D. Computer Expense
F. Other (Insurance, Surcharge,
Finance charges, and
Processing)
$ 10.00
$ 15.00
$ 10.00
$ 50.00
$ 8.87
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS:
FEE (profit)
TOTAL COST TASK 5:
$ 93.87
$ 388.45
$ 3,072.00
o
o
o
c
EXHIBIT 4
WATERMAN AVENUE STREET WIDENING
risk 6 - Coordjnation and Penltts
DETAIL~ COST
DIRECT LABOR Hm!M 8m IiIAL
P1'incipal 3 $ 47.00 $ 141.00
Managing En?ineer 48 32.00 1,536.00
Project Eng neer 8 27.00 216.00
Transportation Engineer 8 23.00 184.00
Designer 8 17.00 136.00
Draftsperson 6 14.50 87.00
Word Processor 7 12.00 84.00
------..--
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR: $2,384.00
INDIRECT COSTS (Overhead)
OVerhead Rate:
148.53%
$3,540.96
~
c:> QIRECT COSTS (Except Labor)
A. AutODDbile Travel
B. Reproduction Expenses
C. COImUnications
D. Computer Expense
F. other (Insurance, Surcharge,
Finance charges, and
Processing)
$ 40.00
$120.00
$ 25.00
$ -0-
$ 30.30
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS:
FEE (profit)
TOTAL COST TASK 6:
$ 215.30
$ 888.74
$ 7,029.00
o
o
o
o
o
EXHIBITS
ltOURL Y RATE SCHEDULE
$47.00
32.00
27.00
23.00
20.00
18.00
17.50
19.00
17.00
18.00
16.75
14.50
11.00
12.00
8.00
16.00
23.70
Principal
Managing Engineer
Proj~tEngi,,"r
Tran$~rtatjon Engineer
Regi$terJd Engineer
Engineer Level II
Engineer Level I
Senior Designer
Designer
CAD Operator
Designer/Drafts~$on
Draftspe.rson
Junior Engineer
Wordprocessor
Technician
* Survey Chainman
* Survey Party Chief
* RATES ARE EFFECTIVE TO AUGUST 1. 1989.
o
!
o
o
c
EXHIBIT 6
Payroll Taxes
BREAKDOWN OF INDIRECT COSTS (Overhead)
14.0%
Vacation,. Holidays and Sick Leave
e.ployee Insurance
ESOP 1 T
Depreciation Expenses
Administration and Time, not-assignable
19.0%
8.0%
10.0%
3.6%
5.6%
16.1%
11.1%
6.2%
2.0%
2.4%
0.2%
3.5%
0.6%
0.03%
1.5%
5.5%
39.2%
------
TOTAL: 148.53%
!
,
Professional Services
Telephone 1 Telegraph, not-assignable
Occupancy
Printing, Stationary, and Supplies
c:> Business Insurance
Meetings, Conferences
Personnel
Training
Travel, not-assignable
Library
Proposal Cost
Business Taxes
c
c
o
c
o
o
EXHIBIT 7
19B9
HOURLY CHARGE RATE AND
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE
.
$125.00
$100.00
$ 90.00
$ 80.00
$ 75.00
$ 75.00
$ 65.00
$ 72.00
$ 66.00
$ 60.00
$ 55.00
$ 64.00
$ 52.00
$ 50.00
$ 48.00
$ 48.00
$ 65.00
$ 36.00
$ 35.00
$ 25.00
$125.00
$ 60.00
$ 30.00
:
'Senior Principal ..........
Principal in Charge of Project . . .
Managing Engineer/Project Manager . .
Project Engineer/Project Coordinator.
Traffic Engineer. . . . . .
Transportation Engineer . .
SurveY Coordinator . . . .
Senior Registered Engineer.
Registered Engineer
Engineer Level II . .
Engineer Level I. . .
Senior Designer . . .
Designer . . . . . .
Designer/Draftsperson
Construction Inspector
Draftsperson .....
CAD Operator . . . . . . . . . . . .
Junior Engineer/Designer/Draftsperson
Wordprocessor . . . . . . . . . . .
Technician ......... . . . .
Two-HanSurvey Party . . . . . . . .
Survey Travel Time . . . . .. . . .
Survey Vehicle Allowance (per day) .....
Three-Han Survey Party Rates Quoted on Request
Reproduction, special photography, printing and any other services performed
l>y subcontractor, subject to prior approval by the Client, will be billed at
cost plus 15'.
Reimbursable In-house Costs:
Photo Copies . . . . . . .. ......
81 uepri nts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PQshge, Delivery Service, Express Hail
Out of Area Telephone Calls . . . . . .
ComputerTime . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$0.20/Each
$0.30/sq.ft.
At Cost
At Cost
$20.00/hollr
Vehicle mi'leage, between engineer's office and project site and/or Cl ient
offices, will be billed at $0.30 per mile.
Court Appearance, Expert Witness Testimony,
Depositions, and Preparation of Testimony. $150.00*
*Minimum $600.00 for half day plus expenses
NOTE: All rates are effective through January I, 1990, except survey rates
which are effective to August 1, 1989.
c
o
o
o
o
CERTIFICATION OF LOCAL AGENCY
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the and duly
authorized representative of the Local Agency of City of San Bernardino, and
that the above consulting firm or his representative has not been required,
directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with
obtaining or carrying out this Agreement to:
(a) employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person;
or
(b) pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, organization or person any fee,
contribution, donation or consideration of any kind for;
except as here expressly stated (if any):
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the State
Department of Transportation in connection with this Agreement involving
participation of Federal Aid Highway Funds," and is subject to applicable State
and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
(Date)
(Signature)
o
c
except as here expressly stated (if any):
o
,
o I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the State
Department of Transportation in connection with this Agreement involving
participation of Federal Aid Highway Funds, and is subject to applicable State
and Federal Laws, both criminal and civil.
(Date)
c
(Signature)
c
c
c
o
o
TIT~E 49, CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS. PART 29
DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION
The prime Consultant and sub-Consultant under penalty of perjury, certifies
that, except as noted below, he/she or any person associated therew;th in the
capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, manager:
is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or
determination of ineligibil ity by any federal agency;
has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded or determined
ineligible by any federal agency within the past 3 years;
does not have proposed debarment pending; and
has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered
against it by a court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving
fraud or official misconduct within the past 3 years.
If there are any exceptions to this certification, insert the exception~
in the following space.
Exceptions will not necessarily result in denial of award, but will be
considered in determining Consultant responsibil ity. For any except ion
noted above, indicate below to. whom ;t applies, initiating agency, and
dates of action.
Note: Providing false information may result in criminal. prosecution or
administrative sanctions.
The above certification is part of the Proposal. Signing this
Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall constitute
signature of this Certification.
(Signature of Consultant(s)