HomeMy WebLinkAboutR06-Redevelopment Agency
"
,
l(
(
.
,0 0
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - REQUEST FOR COMMISSION/COUNCIL ACTION
.Qlli:.
FEBRUARY 14, 1989
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO OPPOSE ASSEMBLY BILL-160
SynoDsls of Previous Commission/COuncil/Committee Action:
NONE
Recommended Action:
Mayor and Common COuncil
That the Mayor and Common COuncil of the City of San Bernardino
formally oppose Assembly BIll-160 (Mountjoy) and authorize the
Mayor to take the necessary steps to communicate this opposition to
the appropriate State officials.
Community DeveloDment Commission
That the Community Development COmmission of the City of San
Bernardino formally oppose Assembly B111-160 (Mountjoy) and
authorize the Chairman to take the necessary steps to communicate
this opposition to the appropriate State officials.
Contact Person: STEVEN H. DUKETT
Phone:
384-5081
ALL
ALL
SUDDortlna data attached: YES
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $
Hard:
Protect:
Date: FEBRUARY 20, 1989
Agenda'Item NO.~
1 673R/JLV/mv
02120/87
.
aCENDA ITEM INFOIlMATION ItlMMAAyO.
o "
.'
G~EAAl. INFOIlMATIONa
DrmA COMMITTEE ~COHMISSION 0 COUNCIL
Author ~ L I:xt.
Iif> - /!,,; ()
Budget
Filing date
Subject
Meeting date
Ward
Funding requirements
~
CLEARANCES:
Z-I )" -Jj
Date
Yes
N/A
~ounting
o
o Q/"RDA Committee
CITY DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
J)ept
By
Date
J)ept
By
Date
XNFORMATIONAL DATA FORWARDED TO CITY DEPARTMENTS/COUNCIL OFFICES:
Supplied To
By
llayor's office
COuncil Ward
Council Ward
COuncil Ward
Council Ward
J)epartDent
J)epartDent
Date
Date
Date
d-IS" -1'1
Date
%-1$-"
Date
Date
COMMENTS/CONCERNS. Include pertinent comments and concerns of offices and persons clearing
the summary, such as controversial issue., ti~e constraints and funding complications.
Indicate dates when action .Ult be taken.
~\P-
IItl
llA
--
-
, -
Q
S T ~ F R E P 0 R T
(
The League of California Cities, In their February 3, 1989 Legislative
Bulletin, has brought to our attention the need to strongly oppose
Assembly BIII-160 (AB-I60) (Mountjoy). The Agency received the bulletin on
February 13, 1989 and given the time constraints Imposed by the Assembly
Housing and Community Development Committee It was not possible to submit
this Item to the Redevelopment Committee first.
In summary, AB-160 would prohibit a redevelopment agency from acquiring any
real property without the consent of the owner for any purpose other than
publlcly-owned public facilities or Improvements, unless the property
constitutes a pUblic nuisance or Is maintained In violation of zoning
ordinances, buIldIng or housIng codes, or other health and spfety laws.
AB-160 would apply to projects for which a redevelopment plan Is adopted
after January I, 1990, or areas added by plan amendment after that date.
The bill Is a clear attempt to halt what the author perceives as unwarranted
use of emInent domain authority by redevelopment agencies for "private" or
commercial-Industrial redevelopment purposes. The effect of AB-160 would be
devastatIng on redevelopment agenCies.
It Is our understandIng that the author wants to hear thIs legIslation as
soon as possible. The first hearing of the Assembly Housing and CommunIty
Development CommIttee may be as early as February IS, 1989, but no later
than March I, 1989.
This legislation, If passed would have a drastIc Impact on our development
enticement actlvltes for amended plans In existIng projects as well as new
project areas.
It Is, therefore, recommended that the CIty/CommissIon formally oppose
AB-160 and authorize the Mayor/ChaIrman to ta~e the necessary steps to
communicate this oppositIon to the approprIate State officials.
~(
(
1 673R/JLV/mv
02120/87