HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-Planning
C,,",V OF SAN BERNAR~O - REQUST FOR COUNCIL AJION
Brad L. Kilger
From: Director of Planning
REC'O.-AO~,*!ee'F. General Plan Adoption
Dept: Planning
1939 HAY -I AH 8 5S'layor and Council Meeting of
May 6, 1989
Date: May 6, 1989
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
None
Recommended motion:
That the Mayor and Common Council approve in concept
Chapter 2, Infrastructure and Community Services, as
recommended by the Planning Commission, subject to the
Mayor and Common Council's final review of the Draft
General Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Report.
Brad
Contact person: Brad L. Kilqer
Phone: 385-5057
Supporting data attached: Distributed separately
Ward: Ci ty-wide
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source: (Acct. No.)
IAcct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
"7"'_n.,~?
Aaenda Item No
I
,
\
,"",.>,'
(
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 8, 1989
Index
Consultant's Presentation, Chapter 2, Section 6,
Circulation Element
Staff's Presentation, Chapter 2, section
6, Circulation
Consultant's Presentation Chapter 2,
section 9, Parks and Recreation
Staff's Presentation, Chapter 2, section
9, Parks and Recreation
Staff's Presentation on Chapter 2, Section 7,
Utilities
Public Comments
Consultant's Presentation on Chapter 2, section
8, Police
Staff's Presentation on Chapter 2, Section 8,
Police
staff's Presentation on Chapter 2, section 8,
Fire
staff's Presentation on Chapter 2, section 8,
Civic Institutions and CUltural Facilities
\
~
1
1
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
8
,,-
(
City of San Bernardino
Planning commission Meeting Minutes
April 8, 1989
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Nierman at 9:16 a.m.
in the Council Chambers, City Hall. The following commissioners
were present: Lopez, Corona, Lindseth, Sharp, and Brown. Staff
present: Kilger, Bautista, and Ross. Consultants present:
Tescher, Meyer, and De Gano. City employees present: Hardgrave,
Klatt, Ramos, Stejskal, Kersey, and Richardson.
All those who intended
their right hand to be
the oath.
to testify were asked to stand and raise
sworn in. vincent A. Bautista administered
Consultant Presentation
Consultant, Michael Meyer, gave a brief presentation concerning
Chapter 2: Infrastructure and Community Services, Section 6,
Circulation. Meyer mentioned the five different alternatives that
were evaluated. He also discussed a series of 30
implementation programs that the city will implement to achieve
the goals and policies of the Circulation Element.
staff Presentation
Mr. Bautista presented the staff's recommendations for changes to
the text, goals, objectives, policies, and implementation programs
dealing with Chapter 2, Section 6, Circulation, starting on Pg.
316 of the General Plan.
Chairman Neirman suggested that the following sentence should be
placed at the end of Policy 6.8.1 P. 331. "This review shall be
at least once every five years."
Motion No. 17
Commissioner Corona made a motion that Policy 6.8.1 be adopted as
revised. It was seconded by Lindseth. The motion was unamiously
carried.
Public Comments
Jim Richardson, Deputy city Administrator, made some comments
concerning I6.22. He felt this function should be the
responsibility of Omnitrans and the city should operate a shuttle
system in cooperation with that agency.
Motion No. 18
commissioner Lindseth made a motion that Omnitrans would operate a
shuttle system in cooperation with the cityThis is to be included
in I6.22. It was seconded by Lopez. It carried unamiously.
"-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING COMMISSION MEE~NG MINUTES OF ~RIL 8, 1989
PAGE 2
/
(
Public Comments
Bob Ray, Attorney, residing at 795 E. 39th Street, San Bernardino,
with practice in Redlands. He was concerned about the potential
impacts which could be caused by the the proposed Harrison
Freeway. He opposed the construction of the freeway. Discussion
followed.
Motion No. 19
Commissioner Lindseth made a motion that the commission add the
extension of Pepper Linden to the Circulation Plan. It was
seconded by Commissioner Sharp. Those in favor were: Commissioner
Lindseth and Commissioner Sharp. Those against: Commissioner
Brown, Commissioner Lopez, Commissioner Corona, and Chairman
Neirman.
Motion No 0
commissio made a motion to not add the Pepper Linden
extension rom Cal State Campus to Waterman Avenue to the General
Plan Circulation Element. It was seconded by Commissioner Brown.
Those in favor: Chairman Neirman, Commissioner Brown,
Commissioner Lopez, Commissioner Corona, and Commissioner
Lindseth. One opposed: Commissioner Sharp.
on Freewa N toR 0
commission own moved that the General Plan Circulation Element
should not include an extension of the Harrison Freeway north of
State Route 30 on the Circulation Element. Second by
Commissioner Lopez. Passed unanimously.
on F eewa South of Route 0
The Harris
Motion No 22
commissione rown moved that a future specific plan for the
Norton Air Force Base area should establish additional north/south
access between I-IO and SR 30; it (a specific route) should not be
included in the General Plan Circulation Element at this time. It
was second by commissioner Lopez. Passed unaniously.
Motion No. 23
commissioner Lindseth made a motion for the approval of the staff
recommendations for Chapter 2, section 6, Circulation, contained
in the Staff Recommendations with modifications.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Corona, and carried
unanimously.
\.
'-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ('~
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETTNG
PAGE 3
MINUTES OF ~RIL 8, 1989
(
Motion No. 24
Commissioner
2, Section
Commissioner
Lindseth made a motion of intent to approve Chapter
6, Circulation, contained in the General Plan.
Corona second the motion which passed unanimously.
Consultant's Presentation
Consultant Tescher gave a presentation on the seven basic areas
concerning parks and recreation. He discussed the continuation and
confirmation of the standards that have been used by the city. He
also commented on the definition of an objective to add a total of
a minimum of 507 acres of parks to reflect the build out of the
plan. He also discussed the priorities for the development of new
park land in the northwest and eastern portion of the city, and
the means of funding for the park lands in the city over time.
Staff's Presentation
Valerie Ross presented the staff recommendations on Chapter 2,
Section 9, Parks and Recreation.
Mr. Tescher recommended retaining Issue F as contained in
General Plan, Pg. 428. He stated that Issue F is referenced
the policies and the programs. The policy in which Issue
referenced is 9.3.2.on P. 433 of the General Plan. Staff
there was no problem with retaining Issue F in the Plan.
the
in
F is
stated
Motion No. 25
Commissioner
Section 9 of
seconded it.
Lindseth made a motion that Issue F on P. 428 of
the General Plan be retained. Commissioner Corona
The motion was carried unanimously.
Public Comments
Annie Ramos, Director of Parks, Recreation
made a comment relating to I9.8, P. 438
felt if this implementation comes up for
that the Parks Planner position be the
concurred with the staff recommendations.
and Community Services,
and I 9.11, P.439. She
a final consideration
one to consider. She
Motion No. 26
Commissioner Brown made a motion
Parks and Recreation as revised.
Corona, and passed unanimously.
to accept Chapter 2, Section 9,
It was seconded by Commissioner
"
CITV' OF SA~ERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
j
r
"
REQUEST TO SPEAK
DATE OF HEARING Htfi {, /9 n
SPEAKER'S NAME J/fnC:S i /y>VtJ-3
ADDRESS //0 0 j~ .5 r ri/ OU-/ ~-;-,
PHONE
;7>- ,FZ, 77
ZIP q 5J.A-IC Y
ORGANIZATION
/ /f/..P ((./ i .) v f-rL-
Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes.
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED
rid,vefSe:./' j4U-'C'-Gu'ffY G)CTE7U-~ CIl) MiC./TI-,
J:::>
ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
Yes ;.// No
Staff Only Below This Line
Request Received: Phone ~ In Person ~ Written ____ By
Date: 5 / b / 8ft"'! Time q Q P.M.
position on Agenda
PC
MCC
/
\..
~
I
CITY' OF SAN'''BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
REQUEST TO SPEAK
DATE OF HEARING
~.IJ,
::~ 15USE
PHONE
Jlz- 4JtlL
SPEAKER'S NAME
ADDRESS
ZIP
Note: Individuals
inutes, Organizations
5 minutes.
ORGANIZATION
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED
) ,
ARE YOU
PLANNING TO
SUBMIT WRITTEN /COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
Yes ~ No
Staff Only Below This Line
Request Received: Phone ~ In Person ~ written By
Date:
5 / C:7 / 8ft"!
Time
q
Q P.M.
position on Agenda
PC
MCC /
2-
,
CITY OF SAN''''BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
,
"""
REQUEST TO SPEAK
DATE OF HEARING S - <;;: - ($ 9
SPEAKER '5 NAME ~..~ C Sw~ J: PRONE ?Ii" - 'i<;\f 3- -:;5&::
ADDRESS 3Cf:;l 5 ~ (J.'A- B~ c:= "S~ ~- ZIP .3 ::J..'-jDY
ORGANIZATION HERB CLr:1VI?.J../S-t\I1) RiE,'IIl-tf\l
. I
Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, organizations - Max 5 minutes.
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED L ~E.E~JAJ/~/ - 1)/,4.$))-
u/#91 BA-~~
ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
Yes ~ No
Staff Only Below This Line
Request Received: Phone ____ In Person ~ Written ____ By
Date: 6 / b / 8i~ Time "1 @' P.M.
position on Agenda
PC
MCC ./
\.
~
.3
--
,
\" ,
...........' /
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
,
""'"
REQUEST TO SPEAK
-!? ~ --?1
SPEAKER'S NAME ,7. jo... S'^^--<> ~r
ADDRESS LJ"i~ 4 M'I...-r;?~ 'Or-. s:\1
ORGANIZATION ?D C I ~ rY{ ~"\.
DATE OF HEARING
PHONE
If <...{ ~ - 2'29'1./
q~~clt(, ZIP 9l.. 'f.O'+
Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes.
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED ~r-I S <!l '-- -C..,...,. -' .. ~1
ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
Yes ...!- No
Staff Only Below This Line
Request Received: Phone
Date: 5 / b / 8,1
In Person ~ Written ____ By
Time q G P.M.
position on Agenda
PC
MCC
./
'"
~
4-
"
CITY'" OF SAN "BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
,
"'"
REQUEST TO SPEAK
DATE OF HEARING J~ /J7/-r1.<! '1
, r" i
SPEAKER'S NAME .:.jp-r J/IF'I ~f:
ADDRESS u 7 J./" /)O,j'l r/ ajO-u
" !
ORGANIZATION
PHONE
0'7:;>
/, (, '..)
. .
- It( 7 j
0") C ~c!
f.-x. -
ZIP
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED
orga?izations - Max
Nr7. rr 1 Su/1r/
,
5 minutes.
)':f- ~~~? tI/r2-U:
/
../
Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes,
ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
Yes No
Staff Only Below This Line
Date:
6 / h / 8,8"7
In Person ~ Written ____ By
Time q g P.M.
Request Received: Phone
position on Agenda
MCC
v"
PC
\.
~
6~
r
"
CITY' OF SAN'--'BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
, ~
REQUEST TO SPEAK
L()OVl...- D L; ~V 50 5 f,[ t)-)C
LFr5'\ ~
(II(; 7 }?1
l?o fJ f( A-..J
ADDRESS ~S .l... 3T~ ~.
,
ORGANIZATION C' '("I\'(1'\1.l Nl~,,\
DATE OF HEARING
PHONE
ls&-2. ,-&"Y 3l.
ZIP ? 2 V (j l)
SPEAKER'S NAME
5. 3~
(Y\ ~~ I6~Q
Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, organizations - Max 5 minutes.
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED
Q CQ.. c.\J \ f\~
ARE YOU
PLANNING TO
SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
Yes X No
Cf)/VL"
fe-t-."}" ,...j
Staff only Below This Line
Request Received:
Date: 5 / 6
Phone ____ In Person ~ Written ____ By
/ ~1 Time CJ Q P.M.
position on Agenda
PC
MCC ./
\.. ~
7 iff
('
"
CITY-OF SAN~ERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
,
"""
REQUEST TO SPEAK
DATE OF HEARING s- t -/9'-
SPEAKER'S NAME \. J; rI e.~.f ~ 'n to r-r
ADDRESS 3~/~ S~" Cr:t.b r / e.. ( S'r
PHONE
1'13-1-3'1<1
ZIP <1"< f(J 'I
ORGANIZATION
Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes.
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED Inln:t.rtrlAc.frA,..e
ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN OQMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
Yes v No
Staff Only Below This Line
Request Received: Phone In Person ./' Written By
Date: 5/ 6 / 8i1 ~me '1 Q P.M. -
position on Agenda
PC
MCC /
\.
~
o
. . '"
/"-
''''
CIT'f'OF SANiJERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
REQUEST TO SPEAK #!~/I- ^
(j1) CI-tA. cre; ~ (Y(t/iG
,.. 1<./"'"
{]J FC,1 (; -z-
()
DATE OF HEARING<-~ )77/: <f /-,
7 l'-; .
, , ' , ,
SPEAKER'S NH"'" . '. .-" .~- I
l'U.u;,- . l,,_~~ './(,.-'rj,--"-~',-1
'f~
PHONE
c c.? ,- cf ,- ~
.J I~' ) -c.> -' '..-' ,.'
ADDRESS
r-'-;--:-" ,"-
'0 ~
.-i~."':?' .~ ,F
r:. -I"~ ,....,.
........ . :,c>-tc:'--L..ft-1'
;
-'~ -; ~,..
{-; "
~"\::j.:i!.-.;
ZIP
~.!~"'" C.'c' If:
ORGANIZATION
>1
,_~J. <. C
Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes.
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED
/-i ...,t.-.
:.~_I<.-<:..~./l )/ }t."'-~ r c.('--;~';/7)-[C'-1<_.~1.-~__ ~/
r ,
" _Ii jl ,
rc.,..-"/- /7 ~~-U'..';"-;- ~(:.
~/~:/
! 17 '" ., !
;J.1:-'.7_P..f.-{.?~--, tf?:.. ,7"';//.
Ii ;,/ ~ ,.,'
',r , ./ , .~'#
""__ i., ,f-,'" .--It'~. ,L.._ f ,. .,
/ ,/
,./',. ,
4-'.'A .
i-I'.-l:~_,'-:._
-.
? ,I, ;~,
/( l';:j J" tft./,-:' -.(j;. / ~
;,/ /.
"
(,'L< <:-.-~' .
ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
,
., Yes No
Staff Only Below This Line
Request Received: Phone In Person -.i.. Written -L- By
Date: 5 / f:, / 81' Time 1 @ P.M.
Position on Agenda PC MCC V
c
CITrOF SAN13ERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
,
"'"
REQUEST TO SPEAK
DATE OF HEARING :.5~~ L,.
SPEAKER'S NAME /.', lJ." , .~--
.
:.? /' _ .J /.~ -
ADDRESS . / j (/ , i i . . .' .
ORGANIZATION
\/
o I
111'<;-
tL//st';"\
1 ;;;;{l lfilC0-
MC~?-
C c:: I J.-, ""-- c:-
,) i'l .0 ~ ! .~' .. 'j
PHONE
ZIP ,::( J <l,) "
Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, organizations - Max 5 minutes.
ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED
ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING?
Yes No
Staff Only Below This Line
In Person ~ written
Time q 8' P.M.
PC
By
Request Received: Phone
Date:
6 / b / af1
position on Agenda
MCC I
~
'"
.g
'I..-
,'._h . "\:.."_' '
'"". '!~,>!o'_' :.:~_,:. :"_:,t~-- <jE:1..~:,_ <:;. ",' :_~ .. ~":t,}; ':i:":_'1"'i1~'T
"..,v';:'~' --'. 'c....;.~"'~"liy;t\f:J'I'-~"'O';'..-i.. ~.."t.!'iJ.~f; ',<"""'~~"
.. ....'......: ,:. -', ,','.,/
:\,"":,,,.;:- ,:~"'~:I~:"_";' '.;~'
(jj)
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
---/ /
, . 6 3"/./ / 6
PETITION ~..<-Z. < / ~/ J 7
1.
NAME
~r~1<~ ·
1.J.'-d-I-J. &.
\"'H-tl &,
TELEPHONE NO.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8:
9.
12.
13. 3)~
14. 31 &--7
15. S-
16.
17.
18.
20.
21.
22.
23..
24.
,5. o;)L~
\ __ 1 .....
:-~)---. .' -~
~/~f~ ~ 6t3~1'1
'.)'.-. .
,~
"
.r
~
;s.
,~,
{;
'{
"
,
Ii I
, .
':' I
...-... '
c
',. ':,;",<:::>:'.:V~\"""!\;~~,.;<:~,~r'ii:;"lO',\,;~~""..,.,,
~' '
-:~,~.- ,.: "-,
,;~ ",' '_ l, ~ , :.
~,',}-- ""\,. ,- '~-..;'
PETITION
~/
// --",-. 02/
V'J-~~' /-!>
@)
.1'7
We, the undersigned residents of the ValenciajHarrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
/
ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO.
.<~ </ ,,3cJ/'$ J~~ Z-~__c5. '',ij/j?$'6
~~~
7/~ ~~. ",$05
~~.;L/~
5.
6. :,;y'
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
- <Q~
.r".lo/ ,~
? 2::L3.j-t't
1. 9Ji-~lf
i~
f3!lj -f7gtb'7 ';
I r.
15.
~o '.F ~
.Q. ~ 3"" (r:, 5...<Y'A-^'Ylr~ <] Jt/ %' 'if), -1 \ ?-i-f
'poH::( :5;"J'l'~~. ~97f., {'~;t?~.~~ &'8'3-5><f;)...d--..,
];;;i~':/:;:rt ~ ::<
. ~ -(JOt),
6 (,. h2,u'l']C 4.!i II U/L ~ ~/- J~'fD
Y-;UAk'7t(cAJJ{rIr )d. ~~ ~ ( /J1 'fO
~~4?~"~
%--Zlaf/? <r- <! L-G
'!J !jP_;Jk~ (~
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
"
";';
, l'
; ~",\, <",
~'fo.:'h, ,
.re.>,;)'
. ,'"
\",'
,'4.:
,
"
~
.
,~
.
; .;':,$;' ~:;
-;
;~J
. '\:'.""~
.,.;'-', "
. .,~ ~,:',;<.. ,. ,~
I.
~i
i1
H
~(
;~.
iF
,
;..
c
OETI T ION
"'"'
--I
"\
J
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison ~
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there ~V/
has been no need shown for such roadway.
NAME
ADDRESS
05 ~ad ;/fl!1
TELEPHONE NO.
?fd. d03
?(d 'g-.7--
5 -J.j5 'Mi,
:~:t:,tJ;:~;;:-v;-t'l r; 1ftJ!, ~~-~11
i
@. C;~~G~ +1)(Z.bo'/"~ S+\.I..",...-r) 39~E Sa.'; GI/~te.'Et..1 S B 8!fb-41~ Y Ii)
9. ~,..f..,..u 1,(.'/",-,- .17" ~ /i4" 12.. k S6 gO H 0 '.
10. ~~ ~~ 3SC,( ~ G,""t>>QIE 1_ -S~. ~<t~-;(O<OO
11. ~..J ~ .r'7y.f. ~ <;,(f l?'J'J'-b,/()7
12. ~mt/.vel {fJ~~ 7 iP1 ,5~..,Y-(O . 8"<1:1- J<( 7 (
13. S 2 77/
14. 73/ ~,{ZI)L S./d fiff'.5-zf-d...3.3
15. 73/ creJlC)~ J:'. ecf3-6'd33
16. '5/1 8'3' -53a;7
!f-S30~
yc7x/l " ff7/7}/
1jr-3. F I(O-fA 58 gtJ3--0913
,[: 40 't-A ~ S& 5-05<; -'5
;jf ~t:k a/3 836,887/
7'i S- ~~.3 't~.. S. (S. 5"rr.3 ~f ~ 2.
a>1.
,
H:
:~:
\l
'.
~r
t
1:
'j
.1
18
:i
19.
20.
21.
23..
I ,
..~
i
i
ll"
1','
"
~l:
;i;
ii
i~~
s::
~p
22.
24.
.
25.
C OETITION ::.
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
"./
@
1. -/6;2.7
2. ,./, ~7
<l1;r,JS""JCo
c9B( - ~2.~
5. e'i? 6 - 3~6 Y
6. g9.<1)49 ~
7. t j' ~V-U> r-
8. J a. 73 JlJ
9. ~~-,).73yr
,.. 3!)~
11. /l... 'L"
12. . ~C'/'L2-?
13. iib- -Z:Z..4il<<f
14. p'r6'- 22
"
s/f ?/6f f)
'06 ?7.1
g"
17. -'",1-TJ / 7 711'
""12 ~ ,() ew PCJf+ l~.
Pi" j-tj?~ (c .:~:
18. W
~ll
19. ~ . -~.~~ >.J. f?8~ "lID '!i Ii
:~~
~~ Ave. fh. - tf/77 Ii
ilf-&' II
"
-- .n
3/<JC: IV t((lj'&/rCl.ti ,4 vI!. 8'g-~ -.s6 y~ :.ii
;:
. rr .z. -9 ff'1
:~i:
~~Oet~tM~ ~2.'ifiB/ (
23 W
/II(~Jtf~p ffl i' .Jlf. L.
--.- "
. 25.
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
c
CPETITION:) rt:::1>
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wa~
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
, )
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
1
4.
5
6.
7.
8.
9
W
i.
"
"
16.
f.
li
,>
'!
- ~N
Z'~-31tS
%~3 -,-/.1<1'-/
I,
't
21.
n'
il;
~tl
~lj
+
II
}l
i'
:!
l~
22.
,:l
23.
hi
24.
.
25.
c
C PET I TION
p,
....,J
, ;
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San @
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison ~
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
~ME ADDRESS. TELEPHONE NO.
l.~u-',IJi~ (('-IV ~~ ~.S.t! rl,)-72~
:~~"/d";;~~
4'.'-#~7 k.,~. if I( "
S. ~h' J (~ ~.., ':'~ /t'fs. E Y/ ,/ ) f
6. _~JL (J. <J/A: II rJ.r e,ii~
II"
ffYDT?
'"'
8.
P,?1-727Y
f7~-:J ~~-7
Yf2..- ~.P. <'<f
: !
. ,
I
! I
,
I'
I
"9
I'
:!
i
l
1 I'
I
1 'J"'JC V c..,.. ;. 1- ~or 1
1St=:- k~~' ~31 .AI j.JI/7~? '.
16. . - ~ 4 s: l,o ~^ Gu.~t'.f?1 t;'f 1!'31-~qJ( I
17. ~~~d' y?y,~, J?'S""tJ ~ ?8"6 I "r.:l. 0 i
@18. ? C/ ~ PtJ!'~-".U~A &-"}~7--dff+ ~...j?, ,~~~~ i,
~9.b/7, ~ h-J.M. ~ .:f~?:.?!)k~ '~~8:Jo.f7J
::t~;~';~~~(.- ~ti~3:~.~:~7:!
&22~- r~/P:/~>7~./ 3!J1!7~<,~"'~C7~ ~&-Z-76~/~'
~fi~~_ft'!!Z-:~ ~!~~:;;: ~:~B.
~2A~.u--.__u .1' .~J:;..... ~
r
~
c
--- PETITION --, \
""" u___ __ '-" ~..)
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San ~3~1
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison .
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
E.~~ ~ .Dr. -"}.~ 8~.11 ,..2cJO$t
20 :.f.. ,I-:.' ~ .e:~.t!.1fI?6$!'
@>l.llI..Vo\~~\tl>> l...k.'rI~ . .. ~_~. .,,,J~ 8&""1Jl!
(;)2.;i//,.~~ I/P/~~,-: ~s,~ SO(!J~/ ~/"r6SqJ0:5!J
23..Jtnw:. ~. _ s.rJQJ~~,,_5r 1J~a..-4&F ?6Yf
24?J1~~~ . l'flg <e.-.i.f.t-hf--- ,. 'jjf'''7't2~
25~':"~' ~?~~-C~...//"~Jh.-.or~
~ TELEPHONE. NO.
- 7/, /- 7 ~ .1./ Tf ~
'?!~DYf-
.f<l;).9'S1-
1
II
"
'1
13.
14.
8"'JI2-7~
...... ... :z. -"7.:a... 7
iI.y-y~ [Jn~;..J Wa..~8-./8'Y?
I' ,,0..
i.Av-er .s.&.8t'l-ov-v
(. \
11.
12.
..
: I
."
C ~ETITION '
'-" -....-I .....<er.;
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash ~
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San ~
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
NAME
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
~1.
~2.
3.
4.
5.
-
6.
8.
.~
:.:
)1:
r
17.
8~i-~
J'Ji_ fss"4.....
~ eft). fl'.!-?JSZ-
, . ..:w88 ~. l1'" 5"6",
4~~ ~~,y~-t:k=~S~ or~~~p
. . . ff3-// /5
.~~.~.~~
t'" ~t~ RJ. SA. YIo-~
~<4-"lD-Y ~{l 8?~- ::ll6S""
'IJ'ol./ D"v"d_LJ~~B. g~~ ..sq~
::
:.
y
,,1
Ii
.,
15
"
,',
20.
21.
':'
.
24.
25.~ ~JTW
:Y
" C
",\",' "
"
. '~,' :: '}:~tNil*.,.;,.~:';;,:;::,,'-,~--..i:~';.,;~.tr.;.i~;;,l~~~,~t~1.... .~-i..,,;..:;. ::,...~ ?~~~~. "". ~~~,-,_;#., ,"
-..,..I," ;...'" "--"
PETITION ..J2..L'i...~. %'~
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
~ , ADDRESS l' TELEPHONE NO.
'~'<<L<3~' -1= '/d" Eff13 -967"1
,:~- ~~ ~.:/ "G'34A,:.,. O;.is:rcJ.1?'
.3 . '-11 Ff'/HtU"" / ~~L&-- ~.j';2 Clz./kJ ""'-<"/"" i If' ,;) ':.s<f elf
L /. ~.A;
4. a
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
hi:l- 770'
~y")-cdl ?
@
.
......'.
,Ok,
,
;;
'~1;.ii
':,~.;.,~-.;.:.'
;:{::...~;, '.;;
""....~.. '- ".'
..",,-;-
("I.
"
.);
;~::; ~
"".,;" , ~
'~- ~ \:.~~~
.:,~.~j;~~';:, :..~
" ',"
",
i1
;\~:
;j: !
'-
^
"-' PETITION :.) ~:I.')
We, the undersigned residents of the VAlenciA/Harrison wash ~
Area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General PlAn Any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
f? E?' ;;J.;J / .s~
8 ~ ;:).02 I.s/"")
!!~. 3:;;'Y;'
8&J- J.s os
~~83Y~
'f/tIttf.) #r-. f If 3 - 21 C?" 0
'4-pu );i(.../9~C)
.t.f7fl.(.ul ~ f/- S-f ~
~. P~z. 6~"7-
'PI( ::; i/-Z. ~ p " -"t./
:s ~~ 73
_ 7973
rJ
IIfo."---__iu(Vu ~tJLtu . PI- - if '7~-
F' f).
CJ.c.u'1 eM... 'llfdJ I{ )1(1bt, _"UI. ~ ~1'3 - 5"17 r
11' F
15. ,~._.,. 17!!t, ~ Z>., 11'8' / .]037
16JJt'~~ J10: ~. ~"...,,-;,~ .(J,.,., , ?t& - 3' </.1-
~7.~-,-_ ~/~ 11~_d.e-. ._- Ft3-//IJ
18. /(()Gf3YL LJf./f/11/I-7 3'7J.-J JAr! G14~t:,'k...J'~. rf3-61S'-
19.J/fn-IY JtnUTdl//T ,-1,"},,)/ ~/~f~ tt'J-/'7JJ,
20.~~ ~b~ O{J~ ~./JtI/~LI ~_____ ;J8;J-7-S7'o-
:~:~ ~~ J ..--~{;~ Vn~!PI ~~ ~::~~~r
:: '~~ti:~iaK/~ct~ 'Wif:?
~F}~ 'if t ((2----- ~ ..uP .------
~ ADDRESS
:.--~::~ ;,;/~~- ~~~.
4.
5.
6.
7.
@8.
9.
11.
12.
13.
14.
TELEPHONE NO.
It
i
I
I
'I
i
,
:1
,.
J
i
I'
I[
.
.
c
PETITION
,....,
criJ
\"."I
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
'-"
. ~ TE~EPHONE NO.
.. ~Z'-'i~P (
.~11----'p-r.:J.. 1i'!~ (33)
,
'eI.SL-t)t'". ~~.:z~t)~~1
~lU. &r0-4ttf}
~;i/
lei I'; J /
/ '.
:<.,.../-.'
I>;(Y i0'; .F {" ('d v ri' .~.;.c/Cfl
~-:'Z ~J::~~~'{~'t
-<.. 'H~ ~ ~,,;./ W7- .c fl. ~jtp ~
- II.
,.- ~ 1/
. d
/
. ,
/(': .,-",'
9.
11.,
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. I
I
19. I
20.
2l.
22.
23.
24.
25.
~
c
--
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
"-" PoETI TI ON
-
...,.I
C!J
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
I'
'- ........, PETITION ../ (/[)
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wa~
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
TELEPHONE NO.
vt/) J"!6-0J't;,/
xY3 -~6 jL"-2-
~:
~~fJIJI/tUJ"~'P/(. y~2..t'd 7?
~;~
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
2l.
22.
23.
24.
. 25.
T
"
'i
I
!
I
~
g~
)~
;:
\~
l
:'1
':
',.
h
Ii
'l'i
'11
'Ii
I,!
,~\
:m
::i::
m
c
PETITION
'-'
r"
'-'
,
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
NAME
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
2.
~o.Ait ~ ~~~~~C
~,,~, .27
r;;; - 'c:3 Y$L
8"ff' J -i-(:? 11
7.$..3 ~ 001
If<, ?v"- ~ ~~"6\1j~
.?09i-?n~~r: ~JtS P;3>-hrcY"
~7'.5 c .39<< k~.kJ
~?Q I.? cj0 cSf, ,:5, L3 '
;~
.
~~
):'
!
;
~~
if? 2 J.CJ.zcJ>
27.;J -..j<r.'L:i!
12 . \;;
13 . '.
,.
;.'
14.
:;}
15 ,",
. <;
~,
16. Ii
17 . ~
k
t
18. ,/I
'I'
19 1!
-_._.__.~~- T
20. II
21 II
_._-~--~. :ll
22 11:
:H
23 .. m
il'
"
24. }
. 25.
---.--.-
C ,,-., PETITION
'-" >.,.,,;I '. .I
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
'.NAME
\ \
1 :'1""1 \
... ,\ '/"'"'
,
,
I /
.\ '\' I ;.' .\. '.
/,f/ L !, i. f " "'-; 1,) -," ,.r;'1,! 'r .u-:'rij ,f. )/~.~.
. i{I/. f' t--:/A fj '-( iI.Af'!, (t~(l Pro
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
,_' ,1
I'~:J i -- ~ j -} ,/J--
\' "
',,) l~' r-.-
').-
3'.
T'I" .! Ii,'
ir', ~ i: />", I /,
,_ .~ . I
., '~~.' l /
.... I'I"~
!- "-'; -:; _ ;"'l L /.j
4.
'->:-<.: ~ , ----. (.
/,' r. . ", /;:)')
L(
5.
6.
() \) r" ,
,\v (f
7.
8.
10.
c
OETITION
~-
/
&,
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
NAME
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ll.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
2l.
22.
23..
24.
. 25.
'1.[1
~ \'
~'t'\'\'(f\l~t""
[, .' I
. _ ~<-""~.-<-Cl-
WAf.! v.
.22 '!
v':,./Ld /-:/ia.o'_
-f) I /
I!/~'v{ {OJ
j?~/
~s,-~()e I
'? f3 -'/~-J'f
~ -I./SS(
F> :~r.;;; Yd-J
d'?3 7? 73
v
r
~:
~~:
,.
f
(~
II,
,"
ii'
,-
W
'.'1'1
'i
,I
II
I,
i!
it
i!
:l~
:.:
it
::li
ih
W
;;:
:i~
C
!-,/
---
PETITION
________.__n..____
....."
.....,-1
We, V1e undersigned resiclent.s of the Valencia/HarriBon wash
area, wis..., to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct t.he Harri son
Expresswai/Freeway. The basis ior our opposition is th"t there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
. ~A] 2 ~ ADDRESS 1 TELEPHONE NO.
1. lv. ~' c to.~ ;2Vi.f3~ ((CN-{~ H'b-1~___~_'3J]2~.?>2~
~. ~'-::_u_,j
2_-.~". ~a;J'~n~/?'...". ~1-~~..T ~ >f~~ f-"~.7
3. ~/ 1/. b .4-t~ 3:<5;Z_~~TXj'-"_2'.7~ 5'
4Zt ~: :s.<1cp:u_li- ....--
6 ~ ~~ ~"~'M,7" #~~g4'd.- <~~dU
8._~.. ' .I1L~ . .4-Lf.g,j !Jet. i1~:___ Vfr.
l7~':: / ~1 /') J ~ F r / Pf!tC!.j.~h
9 '_~_~ . ~~2..f-__=c)_':1j /-~-{t"'~:''7-_li_~!'..v v .
10 ._~~__~ ~a.4ZLRa;;c~~(jf./L,____fff:..-~: 7/7 7
~ , d ~ . ~~
11.~~~~________.;z.37.:J., /'~_ .__, ___ ....%:.Jt.Y:1 -
::~. &~u~~'7:AY~rhn_-,"'HI ~~!
.,.. - 4.. -. __n~C~ k\'j-(p-cL---------~----'+
14._iP~.JA /{ ~--J.f1A..-zt..- ,0 __ ~-1'7..YcJ
~~~~ ~ '
15 ..2?2A4!!!.Jt/-'~ ~~____.d!Lt/5;JJ?(JXJuw;--/I. ___'-1J1R.3,)3~
16.
17.
....
_________ _____0'_- ._.'____
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
~.<.~..*,'
C
1.[
OPETITION
......~
/
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
:~
.
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NO.
1,.
4.
5.
6. i:
7
:,
8.
9.
1
q3~57
eJ? 3-9' tf ..-7y
~- -pif
? V.,;:L G ~ ~:2:--
l:
"
19.
. (; E. ~S1H
. ~tfl7 )ic/t", Iv 2~ -0t11 /
c~ l ~) E :D~5+- q{,3 -Z'!09
3j-/0 2??3-'f1G/
. 5)'L-t1 OJ '3 Lfj6 I
_ elf!] i2.r= 01+: iN j ~ 35-fk g:-,r -)- 77/5
1"1,;) ('.~J- ?!- :2. 77/(J
/) -~.li: ffj-l-l()1
..
,.
~
l~:
ili
il'!
!I
r
j
Ii
r
.I
-1)
20.
22
-H:
23..
":;:
W
;i:
24.
:~~
1/3/
Me
OETITION
-.
......,;
We, the undersigned residents of the Valencia/Harrison wash
area, wish to express our opposition to the inclusion in the San
Bernardino General Plan any proposal to construct the Harrison
Expressway/Freeway. The basis for our opposition is that there
has been no need shown for such roadway.
NAME
ADDRESS
//:J.OC
TELEPHONE NO.
)
4.
5.
6.
rid -3 :3/ Y
rY7;;,P5'P'7
,,~.? If)? 7
7.
8.
9.
10. ~~C~ jP...5?-2.dG,__",~~L~
,
11. --4. .I i .LY- ~J /Ati, //t:,r; F=" ..3,5 iJ'I'- ;a-r
12; 1f~ ~ KtAb /tjlf $- ;;:#4-
13. . I
9?7--:L? 7< 0
/(,yt..- '7/79
yY'6-1/:;' C/
... /
.~-I .55
''3
14.
.
C
)f;,\/\-
~!2
t> c Ie:;--. .
17. \~V
. ) , ,
18. Ht"lf!6cc /J'J""GA-'" 05 .~S'"7"i /l/f"lrn~dA K,5f2-<-;c;2-7
19. -jy;qi/A/ ~ .1/1- ~11 // ~ 0 f. ~)j'O 51)! J., b9~
20.~(i~~_ ~_ (1'3o ~ ~,Q. W, f-f.J-,OG?P
21.~' 'uL.o,,)\\-V 'i3~A..-o(H,4
22. i'~ <M'd~ - ti,l \.
23. /J f-.e:<-- 11'/ D'~ X 6;),0 tf'5'(f
;~5 '\). D e \ Qe' ~ \)L.- IJ ~S;"2, - 3:) bif,
357).... tJ.-&., ~/0A ~:S-3~(PP
15.
:> / )
88578
'iSD ~ q). 7
16
i .~~
:::~~}~~:ti' ~
. )
r
"
;:'
'~
j:
;:,
)'
::
:i:
r
:l~
.1
.1
/./', ,
--7'1..(//
c
C I T Y
OFQAN BERN~DINO
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8905-1901
TO:
The Mayor and Common Council
Planning Department
FROM:
SUBJECT: Caltran Comments and Staff Response on Harrison
Freeway (SR 18)
DATE:
May 5, 1989
COPIES:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Comment from Caltrans
"The adopted routing for Route 18 between Route 30 and
Waterman Canyon Road shall be reflected in the General Plan
as per Division 1, Chapter 1, Article 2 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the California Transportation Commission."
Response
Staff has researched this matter and found that section 75.9
of the Code Division, Chapter and Article cited does, in
fact, require the so-called Harrison Freeway to be addressed
in the Circulation Element. Staff proposes three (3)
options:
1) Show SR 18 north of SR 30 to Waterman Canyon as a
dashed line on the Circulation Plan, but take the
opportunity to direct staff to proceed under
section 72 "Abandonment of Highways" of Division 1,
Chapter 1, Article 2 of the Streets and Highways
Code to delete the route as a State Highway.
2) Show SR 18 north of SR 30 to Waterman Canyon as a
dashed line on the Circulation Plan, but state in
the text that the City has no means or anticipation
of funding, but would not oppose state acquisition,
funding and construction. It has been determined
that buildout under the Land Use Element is not
contingent upon construction of that facility.
3)
Show SR 18 north of SR 30
dashed line and add text
availability of funding
eventual development.
to Waterman Canyon
or policy to study
sources to proceed
as a
the
with
'/ /-"
/
STS;:OF CALlFORNI:-BUSIN:SS. TRANSPORTATION AND QSING AGENCY
o
J
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gowemor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT B. P.O. BOX 231
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92.co2
TOO (7") 383.ol609
~.'
~
May 3, 1989
08-SBd-Var-Var
SCH #89621308
'".-~"
~rn
MAY I} 3 1989
"', .
J ',.~
. ,
Mr. vincent Bautista
City of San Bernardino
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
'"
r'iT
Dear Mr. Bautista:
,\',.
,''',,,,;:
.. "-"'IH:"r
" " C:","~II""'.
n- ",. 'fll.J'Nll CA
!.:H:K:.,'-'.l' I',
We have received both the General Plan for the city of
San Bernardino and the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the
General Plan and have the following comments concerning the
circulation element of these documents.
The first area of concern is the traffic study on which both of
these documents were based. We can not fully analyze this
General Plan until the following points are clarified and/or
corrected:
o On Table 11, it would be helpful to have a list of the
assumptions used so that a more complete analysis can
be performed.
o On Table 13, the percentages appear to have been
miscalculated and it is unclear where the 1.6 million
retail trips have been generated from.
o Total build-out of Regional Statistical Area 29 is
stated as 7.1 million trips which is more than all of
Orange County at present. This seems improbable and we
would like to see clarification of how this was
calculated.
o On Page 4-100 of the Draft Environmental Impact Report,
the future volumes for Interstates 10 and 215 are less
than current Ca1trans counts.
o Throughout both documents the words "trip end" and
"trip" are used interchangeably which is incorrect.
This may have falsely inflated the total number of
trips.
o Table 13 adds the different land use types which double
counts the trips that are made between different land
uses.
c
~,
o
~~
~
Mr. vincent Bautista
Page 2
May 3, 1989
o On page 3.2.1 of the Land Use Alternatives, the segment
of Interstate 10 west of Interstate 215 will not be
adequate and will require 10 lanes. The segment of
Interstate 215 north of the proposed Route 30
Interchange should be 4 existing and will require 8
lanes in the year 2010.
The development of facilities for the state Highway System and
local roads in San Bernardino City are critical to the success of
the circulation element of this General Plan. In response to
these facilities we have the following comments:
o The General Plan shall identify truck routes which
shall have 50 foot curb radius at ramp entrances and
interchanges.
o All bus routes should require turnouts and m~n~mum 30-
foot curb radius with prohibition of parking.
o Each project along Interstates 10 and 215 should have
land dedication for future expansion and if
residential, there should be noise attenuation.
o A Ramp Metering Policy for interchanges in the city
should be formed and closely coordinated with the
Department of Transportation.
o The adopted routing for Route 18 between Route 30 and
Waterman Canyon Road shall be reflected in the General
Plan as per Division 1, Chapter 1, Article 2, of the
Streets and Highways Code of the California
Transportation Commission.
o Route 66 should be developed as a possible 6-lane
facility with restricted parking.
o Route 330 should have no access points other than ramps
or interchanges.
In addition to facility management, a circulation element must
contain strategies in reference to demand mitigations and
job/housing ratio to be effective. In reference to Demand
Management strategies we have the following comments:
c
~
'-'
~~
~
Mr. Vincent Bautista
Page 3
May 3, 1989
o Page 4-111 of the General Plan, mentions a
Transportation Management Demand System which is a term
we are not familiar with. If this is a corollary to a
Transportation System Management (TSM) plan, we concur
with that policy because it will efficiently manage
large concentrations of traffic.
o Page 4-94 of the General Plan states that bike trails
are an important part of the city; however, the Draft
Environmental Impact Report totally discounts their
effect. We would like clarification of how the City
will use bike trails.
o The General Plan states the importance of transit in
policies 6.4.9, 6.4.10, and 6.4.11, which is contrary
to the Draft Environmental Impact Report. The Draft
Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan fails
to consider transit in the overall circulation plan of
the city. These inconsistencies should be corrected.
o All transport of hazardous waste in Policy 6.3.5 of the
General Plan should be made during off peak hours and
each carrier should have a plan in case of spillage.
o Neither document states any specific policy on
ridesharing or demand reduction.
o Both documents omit any analysis of how developers will
participate in the funding of Park and Ride lots.
o Given the large volume of traffic being generated, it
will be necessary to examine which arterials will be
updated to the status of alternate corridors to relieve
congestion and/or reliance on the State highway.
As mentioned earlier, demand management will be an important part
of the Circulation Plan, in addition facilities management which
will effectively manage the traffic in the city.
c
,....
o
i
"'-4
'-'
Mr. Vincent Bautista
Page 4
May 3, 1989
Each jurisdiction should effectively manage/reduce traffic
generated. Another aspect of demand strategy is job/housing
balance. We would like to see some analysis of jobs created in
the city in relation to those who commute. In addition, it would
be beneficial if an analysis of the interrelationship between the
Economic Development Element and Circulation were included.
This last section will pertain to funding mechanisms for
transportation facilities:
o If policies such as 6.1.11 and 6.1.14 in the General
Plan are needed to maintain an acceptable Level of
Service, then why does the Draft Environmental Impact
Report state how unattainable they are? If this is
true, the city should adopt a policy to fund the
maintenance an acceptable Level of Service.
o Policies 6.1.3 and Implementation 16.3 shall include
State highways with local streets and roads.
o All new development that significantly effects traffic
should be reviewed by the City as stated in Policy
6.2.7 of the General Plan. Caltrans shall also review
all developments that have a significant effect on
traffic.
We have appreciated the opportunity to review the General Plan of
San Bernardino City and look forward to future communication.
If you have any questions, please call Richard Malacoff at
383-4550.
Very truly yo rs,
0a1vcf
HARVEY SAWYER
Chief, Transportation Planning
Branch B
cc: G smith, DOTP
J Keen, State Clearinghouse
--,
c '-"
~ :>:
....
ll! ;}
0 0
2- '" "
:l , .
0 '" I
,..
.. .. "
III 3 ~ ~
r z ... '"
.. ." ...
.l: Q Q( at
0 ~ II. u. ....1
u
In J 2. 2 w
, 0 . ~
,. ~ ~ <
<t "2 Cl! ~ O! i>l
3 N ... ll! It
2. a.. at
a !'I a.. 'l: .-
2. '" <[ J:
II: ~ a.. :t:
0 .. - r ;
ex: '1, '" I . I
\I.. >- I . t
0
0 OIl . I
(\I I . \- ,
III 0 i I ~
... VI I .
.... I .
"" 2.
~ .... 0 ~ ~ ~
W III - ili
r 0/ t- ~
0 0
" co [ a::
III It i
\r) eel
0
u
:E Pi
0
So! ~!
>
z
III
o
~
<
.
sJ:'
>
--~"
~". t
I
li
'I'
i!li ~ ~
d .l~
I i 1111
o
c
ZiSCD
<~m
...J eo "C
c.Ea.
Z CD:::>>
oalc
-ceo
b eo a:
......(/)-
...J't-~
~ 0 CD
U ~c
a:~CD
00e)
c
...."~
C I T Y
o F
San l)ernardino
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 27, 1989
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE CITY-WIDE GENERAL PLAN
TO INTERESTED PERSONS:
The City of San Bernardino Planning Department
agency for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
comprehensive city-wide General Plan. The study
General Plan is City-wide, and the city's
influence.
is the
on the
area for
sphere
lead
new
the
of
Notice is hereby given that the Draft Environmental Impact
Report is available for public review and comment. The
review period is for 45 days. All comments must be received
by our office on or before May 12, 1989. For your conven-
ience we have included a copy of the Draft Environmental
Impact Report for your review. Please address your comments
to Vincent Bautista, Principal Planner, San Bernardino City
Planning Department, 300 North "0" street, San Bernardino,
California 92418.
We would appreciate your cooperation in meeting the May 12th
deadline, as we are on a tight schedule and we want to ensure
an adequate response.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
B L. Kilger
Director of Planning
jnmg
300 NORTH D STREET SAN BERNARDINO,
CALIFORNIA 92418.0001 714/384-5057
PRIDE ~
~~RESS
c
c
C I T Y 0 F~ A N B E R ~ R DIN 0
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8903-2312
TO: Distribution List
FROM: Brad L. Kilger, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: Revisions to the Administrative Draft General Plan
DATE: March 28, 1989
COPIES:
-------------------------------------------------------------
During the review of the Administrative Draft General Plan,
the Planning Department envisioned being able to send to you
a set of approximately 30 pages containing corrections or
changes which could be used to "delete and replace." However,
the consultant has made additional modifications which have
resulted in changes to well over 200 pages, plus a complete
repagination of the document. In view of this, we have had
no choice but to issue a completely new Draft General Plan
entitled "Public Hearing Draft."
Attached is a list provided by the consultant of the "sub-
stantive" revisions they have made. I regret any inconven-
ience this may have caused. If you have any questions,
please contact me or vincent Bautista at 384-5057.
- ~L-//
~~
Director of lanning
mkf
attachment
Distribution List
Mayor's Office
Councilmembers
Citizen Advisory Committee
Department Heads
Planning Commission
c
30 March. 1989
---
'-'
~
'-'
The following indicates the revisions to the Administrative Draft General
Plan for the City of San Bernardino which were incorporated into the final
Public Hearing Draft. These only include substantive revisions to the
Plan's goals, objectives, policies, and programs and exlude typographical
errors and data/issues changes.
Jtem/AOO~ P8Qe
Obj. 1.1. P. 48
Pol. 1.1.6, P.50
Pol. 1.15.34 "b", P. 75
Pol. 1.16.33, P. 79
Pol. 1.20.33, P. 85
Pol. 1.21.32, P. 86
Pol. 1.24.33, P. 91
Pol. 1.34.11. P.104
Pol. 1.45.1, P.114
Page 114
Pol. 1.45.7{now 1.45.8),
Page 114
Pol. 1.45.8{now 1.45.9),
Page 114
1.46.3
Imp. prog., P. 134
Obj. 2.1, P.171
Imp. Prog.12.1, P. 177
Imp. Progs. 12.2, 12.3, and
12.4. p.1n
Imp. Prog.12.7, P. 178
Imp. Prog. 12.20, P. 181
Imp. Prog.12.29, P. 183-4
Imp. Prog.12.30, P. 184
Prog. "C' 5 Yr., P. 185-6
Table 10(now 11), P. 187
Imp. Prog.13.2, P. 226
Imp. Prog. 13.8. P. 227
B~ision
Text: population number
Text: number of acres
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
New policy 1.45.2 and renumbering of all
subsequent policies (1.45.2-1.45.3, 1.45.3-
1.45.4, 1.45.4=1.45.5, 1.45.5-1.45.6, 1.45.6-
1.45.7.1.45.7=1.45.8, 1.45.8-1.45.9, and 1.45.9
-1.45.10)
Text
Text
Text
New implementation program
Text: number of residential units
Text: number of residential units
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text, 2nd paragraph (number of units) and
table of affordable units
Table
Text
Text
c
,-.,
Imp. Prog.13.13, P. 228 V
Pol. 5.4.14, P. 302
Obj. 7.14, P. 334
Obj. 7.16, P. 335
Obj. 7.17, P. 336
Imp. Prog.18.4, P. 354
Pol. 8.3.4, P. 362
Pol. 8.4.1, P. 363
Pol. 8.5.2, P. 363
Pol. 8.7.2, P. 377
Pol. 8.7.3, P. 377
Imp. Prog.18.20, P. 379
Imp. Prog. 18.21, P. 379
P. 386-389
Imp. Prog.18.31, P. 390
Imp. Prog. 18.32, P. 390
Imp. Prog.18.34, P. 390
Imp. Prog.18.35, P. 391
Imp. Prog. 18.43, P. 392
Imp. Prog. 18.47. P. 392
Imp. Prog.18.48, P. 392
Page 404
Page 404+
Imp. Prog. 19.1, P.410
Imp. Prog.19.10, P.412,
Imp. Prog. 110.3, P. 428-9
Imp. Prog. 111.1, P. 463
Pol. 14.1.3
Pages 539-544
Text '-'.
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Delete
Text
Text
Text
Text
All policy references to programs are revised
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
New Policy 9.1.9 and renumber remaining
pOlicies (9.1.9-9.1.10, 9.1.10-9.1.11, 9.1.11..
9.1.12,9.1.12-9.1.13, and 9.1.13-9.1.14)
New figure (Conceptual Equestrian Trails)
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text
Policy references to implementation programs
have been revised for: 14.1.4, 14.2.1, 14.3.3.
14.3.4,14.3.5,14.3.6,14.3.7,14.3.8,14.3.9,
14.6.1,14.6.2,14.6.3,14.6.4,14.6.5.14.7.1,
14.7.2,14.7.3,14.8.1,14.8.2,14.10.1, and
14.10.2)
The following indicates the substantive revisions to the background and
policy overview sections of the Plan:
Land Use Policy Overview,
P.41
Housing Needs Analysis,
P.165
Housing Issues, P. 170
Additional text describing open space
resources contained in the plan.
Additional text regarding SCAG 5 year
projections.
Additional text
c
Economic Development
Issues, P. 248
Public Services, Police,
Issues. P. 349
AirOuaJity. P. 441-449
Noise Element
"...... "'"'"
'-'-'
Revision of first issue
"
Revision of text
Text revisions to comply with SCAOMD
requirements and standards.
Insertion of existing and future noise contour
maps.
c
C I T Y
o F n A N B ERN ,)R DIN 0
INTE~FFICE MEMORAN~
8905-2306
"""1
-"
/.---
........
TO:
Mayor and Council and Affected Departments
FROM:
Brad L. Kilger, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: Inserts to the Strike-Out/Underline Version of the
Draft General Plan
DATE:
May 5, 1989
COPIES:
-------------------------------------------------------------
The attached pages are to be inserted into the Draft General
Plan in the strike-out/underline version.
Table 1A should replace page 6 in the Introduction section.
The original table is incorrect and should be removed.
Section 2.0, Housing, should be inserted before page 143.
This contains the Planning Commission recommendations to the
Housing Element.
C(/ ffs4
BRAD L. KI ER
Director of Planning
mkf
attachments
'-'"
........
,-'"
.
,....
'-
"""
-...I
\
....J
'-
.-"
TABLEIA
'-
Relationship to Other Plans and Documents
IncOl:porated
Title of Document by Reference Superseded Comments
General Plan EIR Q To be certified May. 1989 and
updated as needed.
Technical Background Q Published February. 1988. To
Report be updated as needed.
Development Code Q Not yet adopted.
Interim Policy Q Published May. 1988.
Document
General Plan Q Published May. 1988.
State College Area Q Published 1964. Various
Plan amendments.
- Highland Area Plan Q Published 1976. Various
amendments.
Verdemont Area Plan Q Q Published 1986. Section V
(portion) (portion) "Standards" pp. 95-156 incor-
porated by reference. Balance
is superseded.
Highland Hills Q
Specific Plan
Central City South Q
Overlay District
Redevelopment Plans Q Various Plans adopted from
1958 to 1986. General Plan
supersedes redevelopment
plans where land uses or
development guidelines are
inconsistent.
,..--
'-
t,
c
,-.
Chapter 1 'Community De~pment
2.0 Housing
~
'-'
1
"-
The following are the Planning Commission's recommended
changes to the text, goals, objectives, policies and
implementation measures for this section.
Leaal Reauirements. P. 143
Revise the last sentence of the second paragraph as
follows.
"state law requires preparation of a housing element as
part of a jurisdiction's general plan (Government Code
Section 65302(c). The element is to consist of an
identification and analysis of existing and projected
housing' needs, and a statement of goals, policies,
quantified objectives and scheduled programs for the
preservation, improvement, and development of housing.
It is also required to identify sites for housing and to
make adequate provision for the existing and projected
needs of all economic segments of the community (Govern-
ment Code section 65583). The most recent amendments to
housing element law (1981 1986, Section 65583 (~)(~)
(c) (1)) require site identification based on local need
for emergency shelters and transitional housing."
B. Housina Characteristics. 4. Housina Value and Costs.
P. 159
~
Revise the first paragraph as follows.
"In 1980 the median price of a home in the City of San
Bernardino was $51,925. By 1988 the median house price
based on Multiple Listina data , had risen 76.2 percent
to $91,500. County house prices rose a little more from
$63,400 in 1980 to $113,220 in 1988, a change of 78.6
percent. However, changes in housing prices in the City
and County are modest compared to what happened
statewide between 1980 and 1988. In 1980 the median
price of a house statewide was $84,745, by ~ 1988 it
had more than doubled, rising 106.9 Percent to
$175,295."
C. Potential Residential Development. P. 163
Add a new paragraph between the fifth and sixth
paragraphs to read as follows.
"Figure 4, Existing Land Use, shows the distribution of
residential uses in the City by single family and
multiple family densities. Figure 6, Generalized Land
Use Concept, includes vacant lands that are designated
for residential uses and existing residential areas
where higher densities are permitted."
'-
Insert Figures 4 and 6 after page 165.
C. Potential Residential Development. P. 166
c
...-
'-'
CHAPTER 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2.0 HOUSING
PAGE 2
.......
>.../.
"
J
'-'
Move the second paragraph through the remainder of the
page to section E. Constraints on Housing Development,
b. Infrastructure, page 182. Merge the fourth paragraph
of this section with the second paragraph. Add a new
paragraph before the last paragraph on the page.
"Generally, the policies and programs of the Utilities
Element of the General Plan provide that the
infrastructure supporting new housing development will
be expanded concurrent with development. The City Water
Department indicates that it has sufficient capacity to
accommodate the demands attributrable to the Plan's
housing buildout. It will be necessary to extend water
distribution lines, boosters and water storaae
facilities for -t,e. new housing tracts on the periphery
of existing development. Costs for such improvements
will be borne by the developers. However, the Water
De~artmeRt Citv is unable to mandate that service be
extended by individual water purveyors within the City.
This could affect the timing and location of
development.
-
The Municipal Water Department has initiated a program
to expand its wastewater treatment capacity. Present
design capacity is 28 mgd of primary and secondary
treatment, and three mgd of tertiary treatment. The
expansion will add 30 mgd of primary treatment capacity,
15 mgd of secondary treatment capacity, UP to 10.5 mgd
of tertiary treatment capacity, and 15 mgd of solids
handling facilities. The treatment plant capacity will
be expanded in either 7.5 mgd or 15 mgd modules
depending on growth within the service area.
Additionallv. the Water Department has entered into a
reaional pro;ect aareement to provide tertiarv treatment
for all existina capacity .
Disposal of the additional sewage resulting from General
Plan residential buildout will require the construction
of new and/or upgraded water treatment and collection
facilities within the City pursuant to the roettsed
Faeilit.ies !faBt.er rlaR aRa the City's Sewer System
Master Plan.
,-
Not all of the area designated for new residential is
served by sanitary sewers. The California Regional
Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region permits the
use of septic systems pursuant to City policies. The
major septic tank areas iRsluae Rartawest af Litt.le
Lea~ae Drive, pertisR5 af the ~cracmen~ area wi~h
parQgls larger than eRa 3sre, cajen 8sy!evard aRe JURe
street area, aRa Rart.Wn"est af t.he Il'l'tcrBt.at.e 215/J8
IRterehaR~e. is located in the northwestern part of the
citv in the Verdemont area .
I".,... .
c
,-.
'-'
CHAPTER 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2.0 HOUSING
PAGE 3
~
'-.;.";'/
~..
.........
In accordance with Chapter 2 of the General Plan.
section 7.0. utilities. the city will be undertakinq a
comprehensive survey of the wastewater collection
facilities to determine deficiencies in the facilities
as well as capacity. Based on this survey. the city
will prepare and adopt an improvement proqram which
establishes how and when improvements will take place."
(No change to the last paragraph)
D. Housinq Needs. 1. Current Housinq Needs a.
Affordabilitv of Housinq. P. 169
Insert the following two paragraphs before the paragraph
that begins "An analysis..."
'-'
"Another explanation is the relativelY hiqh number of
~service sector >>a.ifts ;obs in San Bernardino. The
increase in service sector emploYment opportunities in
the local economy mirrors similar increase at the state
and national levels. In view of the fact service sector
;obs pav less than ;obs in manufacturinq and qovernment
sectors. the affordabilitv of housinq becomes less
important than the waqes paid to employees in this
sector .
Because of the hiqh number of households livinq at or
below the area median income. it is important to
recoqnize that the creation of hiqher pavinq ;obs in the
local economy can have a siqnificant impact on the
abi1itv of a household to afford housinq current Iv
available in San Bernardino. The qoals. ob;ectives and
policies set forth in the Land Use and Economic Develop-
ment elements must be developed to address this aspect
of the affordable housinq equation. "
D. Housinq Needs. 1. Current Housinq Needs. b. Special
Needs Households. P. 172
Revise the last paragraph on this page under (b)
Potential Solutions and Resources, as follows.
--
"The programs section contains several ongoing or
proposed several programs for the rehabilitation and/or
new construction of affordable rental housing in San
Bernardino and the policy section requires (Policy
2.6.3) that a portion of units built with City
assistance be designed with three or more bedrooms to
accommodate large households. Examples of programs that
could benefit large households are the Rental
Rehabilitation Program (12.11), and the proposed
~rehasc and Rehab Freqram (12.27).
Acquisition/Rehabilitation/Resale Proqram (12.221 ."
c
,...-..., .......-.
.,
-.J
.
'-' ~
CHAPTER 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2.0 HOUSING
PAGE 4
!"""
'-
D. Housinq Needs. 2. Future Housinq Needs. a. New Units.
P. 178
Add the following to the end of the first paragraph, to
read as follows.
"The Cit~ ~s required by law to remove constraints to
the prov~s~on of additional housing units insofar as
these constrains are within the City's power to affect.
However, the State recognizes that housing construction
depends on market forces that, for the most part, are
beyond the City's power to affect, and therefore the
goal set by the regional planning agency may not be met.
In addition. other environmental factors mav constrain
the citv's ability to achieve the housinq qoal. These
constraints are discussed in the followinq section. E.
Constraints on Housinq Develooment ."
'-
D. Housinq Needs. 2. Future Housinq Needs. a. New
Units. P. 178
Move the last two paragraphs from this section to page
182 under a new subsection 4. Constraints -Environmental
in section E. Constraints on Housing Development.
Housinq Needs. 2. Future Housinq Needs
Delete Community Development Department from the last
sentence of the last paragraph on this page as follows.
"... A list of these buildings may be obtained from the
City's CommtiRity DcvclopmcRt Dcpartmcftt or fram thc the
California Coalition for Rural Housing in Sacramento."
E. Constraints on Housinq Develooment. 2. Governmental
Constraints - Local. b. Infrastructure. P. 182
Insert wording from page 166 in this section.
E. Constraints on Housinq Develooment. 2.
Constraints - Local. c. Buildinq Codes and
P. 182
Governmental
Enforcement.
Add the following paragraph to this section.
---
"The city's code enforcement orocess does not undulY
oenalize older residential structures based on the aqe
factor. structures are not demolished unless they
threaten the oublic's health. safety and welfare.
Prooertv owners are notified and qiven the oooortunitv
to brinq their structures uo to code orior to any
aooroved demolitions "
c
I""" '"'"
'"'" ...)
CHAPTER 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2.0 HOUSING
PAGE 5
,
j
,
.......
E. Constraints on Housina Develooment. 4.0 Constraints -
Environmental P. 182
Move the last two paragraphs from page 178, D. Housing
Needs, 2. Future Housing Needs, a. New Units to this
section.
Prooosed New Proaram. P. 189f.
Add a new program as follows.
"Redevelopment Activities
I2.17a Redevelooment Aaencv particioation CHousina
Activities
Continus to facilitate the revitalization/develop-
ment of deteriorated neighborhoods through develop-
ment entitlements and other pre-development
activities.
Responsible
Timeframe:
Funding:
Department:
Ongoing
Tax Increment
Redevelopment
Agency
Financing."
'-
Housing Programs
12.8 provision for Soecial Needs Housina. P. 189c
Add CG-2 to this program as follows.
"The CR-2 (located downtown), CO-l, CO-2, CG-2 , and the
RU,RM, RMH and RH designations permit the development of
senior citizen and congregate care housing."
12.18 Buildina and Safetv Insoection. P. 189f
Revise the Responsible Department as follows.
"Responsible Department: Del'lIity AGlIIillistrater
Devclopmcnt Serviees Office of the citv Administrator -
Develooment Services.
12.19 Densitv Bonus. P. 189f
Add CG-2 to the second paragraph as follows.
-
"In addition, the city shall incorporate in the
Development Code provisions which permit the development
of senior citizen and congregate care units at an
increased density of fifty (50) percent ~bove the
permissible density in all mUlti-family designated
areas, and CG-2, one hundred (100) percent in the
--
c
r-
~
CHAPTER 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2.0 HOUSING
PAGE 6
. .
.....,
....)
.,j
--
downtown area (72 units per net acre), and 54 units per
acre in commercial-office designated areas."
I2.25 "Truth in Sale" Ordinance. P. 189h
Replace a word as follows.
"This program proposes a "Truth in Sale" ordinance that
would require information concerning code violations,
zoning status, and property taxes to be provided ~ to
the buyer."
I2.27. Purchase and Rehab. P. 189 :
Delete this program; it duplicates I 2.22, Acquistition/
Rehabilitation/Resale Program.
Proposed New Proqram. P. 189k
Add a new program as follows.
"'-
"I2.35 Analvsis of Impediments to Equal Housinq .
Opportunitv
Conduct an analysis of local housing marketing to
determine any and all impediments to equal housing
opportunities. Future fair housing activities will
be targeted toward the findings, conclusions and
recommendations of this analysis.
Responsible Department: Community Development
Timeframe: July 1, 1989 - June 30, 1990
Funding: Community Development Block Grants."
C. Five - Year Housinq Goals. P. 189k
Revise the text as follows.
"The City believes that over the next five years it will
Reea ~e should produce aeeH~ approximate Iv 5,800 6.280
housing units to contribute to its fHlfil1 its fair
share of regional housing needs. These are distributed
as follows based on the percentaqes established bv the
SCAG RHNA. The rationale for the production of these
units is more fullv addressed in section E. Constraints
on Housinq Development. "
'-
,--
'-
,-~"'"
---
..~
- I
CHAPTER TWO
INFRASTRUCTURE AND
COMMUNITY SERVICES
c
-.
'-'
.....,
,...)
--,
-"
CHAPTER 2 INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
6.0 Circulation
The Planning commission recommendations included here are
changes to the goals, objectives, policies and implementation
measures. Recommended revisions to the text are listed
below, but in most cases, have not been written yet. Prior
to revising the text, the Mayor and Common Council should
review and concur with the proposed revisions and determine
if additional revisions are necessary.
Planning commission recommended changes to text.
Paqe 316
The portion of
italics should
follows.
Government Code Section 65302 (b) quoted in
be quoted verbatim rather than paraphrased as
"A circulation element consisting of the general location and
extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, trans-
portation routes, terminals and other local public utilities
and facilities, all correlated with the land use element of
the plan."
Paqe 316
The two lists (A through F) on this page should be deleted.
The first is not outlined in the General Plan Guidelines as
noted, and the second is inconsistent with the actual
"components of the circulation system" in the element.
Paqe 318
Figure 28 should be deleted since it is included in the
Technical Background Report. Reference to this figure in the
last sentence of paragraph 2, Page 317 should be changed to
read, "Figure 32 on Pages 3-12 of the Technical Background
Report illustrates the roadway standards utilized in 1988.
See current City standards for present design criteria.
Paqe 319. oaraqraoh 5
Reference to Table 3.1-3 should be changed to Table 42.
Paqe 320. oaraqraoh 1
Reference to Table 3.1-3 should be changed to Table 42. Add
the following sentences to. paragraph 1.
The table reflects roadways that were operating at level of
service C or lower based on daily capacities derived by DKS
Associates and the City Traffic Engineering staff, utilizing
level of service definitions established by the Citizen
Advisory Committee which reflect regional driver's percep-
tions of traffic conditions. Level of service C waS "accep-
table" as a volume-to-capacity ratio up to 0.69. Generally,
the upper limit of level of service C is defined by traffic
c
'"
\...
engineers to be a volume-to-capacity
'-"
ratio of 0.79.
Paae 320. oaraaraoh 2
Modify the last sentence to read:
"For example, capacity deficiencies (V/C ratios worse than
0.69) are currently experienced on Highland Avenue, Baseline
street and Redlands Boulevard near I-215, on Mill street east
of Waterman Avenue, on Waterman Avenue near Hospitality Lane,
40th street between Sierra and Mountain View, Sierra Way
between 40th and 5th streets, Del Rosa Drive near Route 30,
9th Street between Tippecanoe and Palm, and on "E" Street
near its southern end."
Paae 322. Section G. Future Conditions
Insert the following new paragraph between paragraphs 1 and
2:
"In order to forecast future traffic conditions and evaluate
alternative land use and circulation systems, a travel demand
forecasting model was developed. The microcomputer model was
developed using the TRANPLAN software and was based on the
regional model developed by caltrans for the Route 30 Freeway
EIR.It, therefore, includes the regional growth and pro-
grammed regional transportation improvements (e.g., Route 30
Freeway) forecast by SCAG and Caltrans for the year 2010. The
focus of the model is on the city of San Bernardino and areas
immediately surrounding the city. It includes 130 traffic
analysis zones (TAZ's) of which 75 are within the City of San
Bernardino. An additional 33 zones were identified to
represent trips to/from locations further outside the study
.area."
Insert the following new paragraphs between paragraphs 3 and
4 :
"Each of the alternatives evaluated, including the Draft Land
Use Element, were first evaluated by assigning the traffic to
the transportation network associated with the previous
Circulation Element. This was done to identify areas of the
City where additional facilities above and beyond those
included in the previous circulation Element should be added
or areas where the travel demands associated with the Draft
Land Use Element don't warrant the construction of new
facilities. In all cases, it was assumed that the facilities
shown on the Circulation Element would be built out to the
roadway standards for that classification of roadway (e,g.,
majorhighways would be fully built out with 100 feet of
right-of-way and 72-80 feet of pavement).
The primary locations where significant capacity deficiencies
were forecast were in the areas south of the downtown area
along "E" street and Waterman Avenue. For that reason, the
Circulation Element recommends construction of a new north-
south roadway from the Tri-City area north connecting to Lena
Road. A limited amount of demand (approximately 2,500
vehicles per day) was forecast for the previously proposed
east-west roadway connecting the CSUSB area to Waterman
c
--
'-'"
....,./
Avenue, so the Draft Circulation Element proposes deleting
this unbuilt roadway
Insert at end of section G:
"ISSUES"
The following issues regarding circulation were identified:
1. A system of roadways must be implemented that provides
adequate capacity to accommodate traffic generated by
land uses in the city at an acceptable level of service
to the community.
2. The impact of traffic on adjacent land uses should be
minimized.
3. The impacts of truck traffic should be minimized,
particularly in residential areas.
4. Alternate modes of transportation should be encouraged
to reduce automobile traffic and to provide options for
both commute and recreational travel by alternate modes.
5. The impact of transmission lines and pipelines on
adjacent land uses should be minimized.
6. Railroad services for the movement of people and goods
should be available to the citizens of San Bernardino
but their impact on adjacent land uses should be mini-
mized.
7. The citizens of San Bernardino need to have access to
air transportation services but the impacts of air
service on the City should be minimized.
8. An adequate supply of parking is necessary to accom-
modate the demands of developments in the city.
9. The availability of parking in some areas is limited.
c
c
""'"'
'-'
\
...,I
GOALS. OBJECfIVES AND POLICIES
The following presents the goals, objectives and policies for circulation in the City of
San Bernardino. At the end of each policy is listed in parenthesis a capital "I" and
number which corresponds to its implementation program presented in the subsequent
section of this element.
~
It shall be the goal of the City of San Bernardino to:
6A Achieve an integrated, balanced, safe and efficient transportation system
that accommodates the demand for movement of people, goods and
services throughout the City generated by the Land Use Element.
Objective
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.1 Provide a transportation system through the design and construction of
individual improvement projects that provides the capacity necessary to
accommodate the levels and types of traffic forecast to be generated by the
land use plan.
Policies
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.1.1 Review annually the functioning of the street system as part of the Capital
Improvement Program to identify problems and shall actively pursue
implementation of improvements identified as needed in a timely manner
(16.1).
6.1.2 Require that all City streets be constructed in accordance with the
Circulation Elemeftt FI:Hleti6ftal Classifieaa6R Map Plan (Figure 29) and
the construction standards established by the. Director of Public
Works/City Engineer (16.2, 16.11). . .
6.1.3 Require appropriate right-of-way dedications of all new developments to
facilitate construction of roadways shown. on the Circulation ElemeRt
Fl:1Retienal Classifieati6R Map Plan (Figure 29), including protection of
right-of-way for future roadways not yet constructed (16.3,16.11).
6.1.4 Reserve the rights-of-way required for highways designated in the arterial
highway and prohibit land uses and development that could preclude the
timely acquisition of these lands for roadway purposes (16.3).
323
c
....-.,
....I
<
a:
....I w
I-
< a:
a: <
w >- a:
I-
a: a: 0
>- <
< < C I-
(,)
~ a: z w
w 0 0 ....I
W ., (,) ....I
a: < w 0
II.. ~ en (,)
I I .
.
.
.
.
. -
-~
0
-8
n
-0
"\jz
<:
0
;:::
~
0
&
0
(j
~
., . (j
5>
~ a5
;;
.
~
.
.
.
.
'"
z
<
....I
Q.
Z
o
j:
<
....I
~
(,)
!!:
(,)
r-l
,
ui "
r---' I
I I
I 1..-'
I "(
I "
I
ell
C\I
W
a:
~
~
II..
I
I
,____J
,
1__...
I
,
'I
,~
,-----t\.I.-"'!:'!
, .. --~.;
I .,L-L --
, ,I'i""~
: , n r
,--
, . ..
r-----...........--.......JI e-6_~
: 1- omu",'I'"''
, '- - LJ-
: r-,-- --..;_
I 1,,'_1_1
r-------- ..,:...../ ii;
,
,
r
c
"'
, ,
,
I
I
,--- 1-. ---,
L_ I -.I I
: I I
I..' I
,I
,,-
I
,
, ,...,
-, .:".~..\
l....
- ~
1--(:'
I .'
\ .'
I .'
,..., '"''''
'\ -..../
~,
,-
e
)
IA~Olf'U'H
.
-I'
"
""'1"11'"'"1111
,1
, ,
---,~\..., If"l""'''.
-
....;IIIIQ 111111.......
: .
'line :
""'
IIIfI
IS " 'et
1"" "~!.!"I1.III1I1..
:..................
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....--...
.'
<I'!t.:.....
.........
~-.....
.....'.
...
.... ...
. "
324
c
6.1.5
6.1.6
6.1.7
6.1.8
6.1.9
6.1.10
6.1.11
6.1.12
6.1.13
-
-...,./
Direct the Public Works Department to be responsible for developing and
enforcing access standards regarding new driveways and other
encroachments to arterial highways so as to minimize side frictions that
are detrimental to safe and efficient functioning of arterials (16.4).
Assign priority to safety over other factors in the engineering design
standards for major and minor arterial highways (16.2).
Provide one-quarter mile minimum spacing between traffic signals. where
possible. to optimize interconnection, signalize only warranted locations,
and strive to implement signal timing that will result in fuel conservation
(16.5).
Prohibit, where feasible, left-turn movements to and from any driveway
within 250 feet of an existing or planned signalized intersection (16.4). .
Use international symbol signing for all regulatory, warning, and guide
signing communication with travelers (16.6).
Install on-street reflectorized raised pavement markers for lane
delineation on major and secondary arterials where appropriate (16.2).
Correlate approvals of new development with roadway improvements
that would be necessary to either maintain a "C" level of service (a
volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.79 or less) and other performance
characteristics applicable to the classification of the affected roadways or
reduce the development's impact to below City established levels of
significance, and that development not be authorized until measures are
in place to construct any necessary improvements, provided that the
development is guaranteed an equitable reimbursement for improvements
provide above and beyond those solely necessary to accommodate that
development's traffic (16.7,16.8).
Require that cumulative and downstream impacts of new development on
the circulation system Ci~ wise be evaluated and adequately mitigated
concurrent with development where practical, provided that the
development is guaranteed an equitable reimbursement for improvements
provided above and beyond those solely necessary to accommodate that
development's traffic (6.7, 16.8. 16.13).
Require that the burden of costs of roadway improvements including
traffic signal installations be equitably distributed among property
owners/developers benefiting from new development and highway users
(16.7,16.8).
325
c
c
....,./
-j
6.1.14
link the funding and construction of circulation improvements to
development, provided that the development is guaranteed an equitable
reimbursement for improvements provided above and beyond those
solely necessary to accommodate that development's traffic, and
development shall be regulated by intensity, type, location and.
phasing/timing to ensure the provision of an a"lei'age peak hour level of
service (LOS) "C" operation e....t:r a 21 flaW' peria8 (16.7, 16.8).
Objective
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.2 Minimize the impact of existing and future highways on adjacent land
uses and ensure compatibility between land uses and highway facilities to
the extent possible. .
Policies
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.2.1 Work with Caltrans to insure that construction of new freeways (Route 30)
and/or widening of existing freeways (1-215, 1-10) include appropriate
sound walls or other mitigating noise barriers to reduce noise impacts on
adjacentJand uses (16.9,16.11).
6.2.2 Locate noise sensitive land uses (e.g., schools, hospitals) away from
heavily traveled highway facilities, if practical, consistent with the policies
of the Land Use and Noise Elements (16.10).
6.2.3 Requires wherever possible, a buffer zone between residential land uses
and highway facilities (16.10).
6.2.4 Continue to participate in forums involving the various governmental
agencies such as Caltrans, SanBAG, SCAG, and the County which are
intended to evaluate and propose solutions to regional transportation
problems as it relates to the City (16.11).
6.2.5 Provide for the development of mixed-use residential-commercial-office
developments to eaptl:ire aeffiaREl. tfiat wel:ilEl. 81:fterwise tra>r:e1 te iHl8ther
area (Le., increase opportunities to work and shop dose to home and to
conduct errands dose to work (16.12).
6.2.6 Provide for the development of multi-family residential areas near job
centers to maximize opportunities for people to live and work in close
proximity to one another (16.12).
326
c
-".'
......".;
--
6.2.7 Require that a traffic impact study be prepared and submitted to the City
for review and approval for all new developments or substantial
improvement to existing developments which will result in significant
increased trip generation so that an adequate evaluation of potential
significant traffic impacts associated with proposed new developments is
obtained prior to project approval and shall require the implementation of
appropriate mitigation measures prior to or in conjunction with project
development (16.13).
6.2.8 Require that adequate access be provided to all developments in the City
including, where feasible, secondary access, to facilitate, at a minimum,
emergency access and egress for the development (16.4, 16.14).
Objective
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.3 Develop a transportation system that provides adequate facilities for
heavy vehicle traffic and reduces the impact of such traffic and through
traffic on local circulation and residential environments.
Policies
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.3.1 Implement a preferred truck route network and sign and enforce truck
weight restrictions accordingly, except in the case of local deliveries (16.15,
16.17). .
6.3.2 Regulate on-street parking of trucks where necessary to discourage truck
parking on primarily residential streets or in other locations where they
are incompatible with adjacent land uses (16.15,16.16).
6.3.3 Prepare neighborhood protection plans for areas of the City where
diversions of heavy vehicle traffic from the preferred truck route network
to local residential streets becomes a significant enforcement problem
(16.16).
6.3.4 Calculate traffic indices on the basis of estimated percent of truck traffic
and forecast average daily traffic (16.15).
6.3.5 Restriet ~e Regulate the issuance of permits to transport of hazardous
waste materials through San Bernardino te ~e freeways afte! V.'atefft\ftR
.^.veRl:Ie ane! MY SlieR and require that any waste generated within the
City must be transported to the nearest freeway via the shortest route
using arterial streets, never local streets (16.17).
327
c
Objective
.--
........
1.....,1
1.....,1
.J
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.4 Accommodate alternative modes of transportation to the private
automobile in the City, including non-motorized transportation (bicycle
and pedestrian), and public transportation and recreational trails.
Policies
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.4.1 Develop and promote interconnected pedestrian facilities and alternate
modes of transportation (16.1, 16.18, 16.20).
6.4.2 Work cooperatively with appropriate regional agencies to facilitate
development of recreational trails, including an equestrian trail system,
that tie into other facilities such as the Santa Ana River Trail system and
provide facilities along the base of the foothills, as well as connections
between these facilities (16.1,16.19,16.20).
6.4.3 Accommodate the needs of bicyclists by developing a plan for safe bicycle
facilities not on arterial highways (16.1,16.20,16.21).
6.4.4
6.4.5
6.4.6
6.4.7
6.4.8
. 6.4.9
Paint pedestrian crosswalks only at signalized intersection locations or
where deemed necessary by the City Traffic En~neer (16.2, 16.18).
;/
Encourage direct pedestrian connections between commercial uses and
adjacent residential development through the site plan review process
(16.18).
Require the provision of adequate pedestrian access for new development
projects through its standard site plan review process (16.18).
Require the installation of handicapped ramps on all new sidewalks
unless precluded by physical constraint or where drainage problems
would be created (16.18).
Encourage the installation of sidewalks and wheelchair ramps in existing
neighborhoods, where appropriate (16.1, 16.18).
Coordinate with SanBAG, Omnitrans and other transit providers, to
ensure that transit services are available to the transit dependent either via
fixed-route transit service or paratransit (16.11).
328
c
c
:)
,
~.,./
6.4.10
Coordinate with Omnitrans on the continuing development of a
comprehensive City-wide public transit system, including opportunities
for convenient transfer locations in downtown San Bernardino (16.11).
6.4.11
Pursue implementation of a shuttle service connecting regional
commercial and employment centers in the downtown and Tri-City areas
(16.22).
6.4.12
Encourage measures which will reduce the number of vehicle-miles
traveled during peak periods, including the following examples of these
types of measures:
a. Incentives for car-pooling and van-pooling.
b. Preferential parking for car-pools and van-pools.
c. Conveniently located bus stops, with shelters (16.22).
6.4.13
Promote the use of car-pools and van-pools by providing safe, convenient
park-and-ride facilities (16.22).
Objective
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.5 Provide for the development of major transmission lines/pipelines
throughout the City while not adversely impacting adjacent land uses.
Policies
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.5.1 Require in new developments that utilities be provided underground.
within public rights-of-way, consistent with the long-range infrastructure
needs of the City, as approved by the City Engineer (16.23).
6.5.2 Require th.at new developments size their improvements to service the
upstream needs of future developments, consistent with the long-range
infrastructure needs of the City, as approved by the City Engineer (16.23).
Objective
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to: .
6.6 Encourage the railroads and other public agencies to develop and
maintain adequate railway facilities within the City to adequately serve
existing and future needs for transport of goods and people,. while
minimizing the impacts on adjacent land uses.
329
c
c
"'"
v
Policies
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.6.1 Coordinate with SanBAG, SCAG, the County and other regional, state or
federal agencies and the railroads regarding plans for the provision of
passenger, commuter and high speed rail service within the City and
linking the City to adjacent cities and counties (16.11).
6.6.2 Encourage the provision of a buffer between residential land uses and
railway facilities and encourage the construction of sound walls or other
mitigating noise barriers between railway facilities and adjacent land uses
(16.10).
6.6.3 Identify existing and future high volume at-grade railroad crossings and
pursue available sources of funding (e.g., California Public Utilities
Commission) to implement grade separations where appropriate (16.24).
Objective
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.7 . Ensure that air transportation services are available to residents and
businesses in San Bernardino but that the provision of such services does
not significantly negatively impact the City.
Policies
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.7.1 Coordinate with regional agencies to ensure that access is maintained and
enhanced between the City of San Bernardino and commercial airports in
nearby cities, such as Ontario (16.11).
6.7.2 Evaluate accessibility to Norton Air Force Base consistent with the policies
requiring review and approval of mitigation measures to accommodate
trips generated by new developments such as the potential joint use of
Norton Air Force Base for military and commercial aviation (l6.25).
.'
330
c
c
-
--
jilll
It shall be the goal of the City of San Bernardino to:
6B Achieve a balance between parking supply and demand in every area of
the City so that an adequate supply of parking is provided to meet the
parking demands generated by the Land Use Element.
Objective
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.8 Ensure that developments provide an adequate supply of parking to meet
the needs, on-site or within close proximity to the developments
generating the demand for parking.
Policies .
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.8.1 Periodically review Fie less thaR eHee e.;ElFY five years and update the
City's development code to ensure that parking requirements for new
developments accurately reflect the demand for parking generated by..
each land use within the City, conducting this review at least once each
five years (16.26).
6.8.2 Require that all new developments provide adequate parking to meet
their parking demands on-site or in consolidated parking facilities within
close proximity to their site, except for developments within the Central
City Parking District (16.27, 16.28).
6.8.3 Continue to expand the supply of public parking in off-street parking
facilities in downtown San Bernardino (16.27, 16.28).
6.8.4 Continue to provide an in-lieu parking fee option for developments in the
downtown area to satisfy all or part of their parking requirement through
the payment of an in-lieu fee which will be utilized to provide parking in
consolidated public parking facilities (16.29).
6.8.5 Require that new developments submit a parking demand analysis to the
City Engineer for review and approval whenever a proposal is made to
provide less than the full code requirement of parking for each individual
land use on-site at the proposed development (16.30).
331
c
".K....
-.,
'-"
-
--'
6.8.6 Consider all concepts relatin~ to ioint use. shared parkin~ and off peak de-
mand to maximize the utilization of existing and proposed parking in the
Central Business District (16.27).
Objective
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.9 Ensure that adequate parking is available in residential neighborhoods of
the City to meet the needs of residents and their visitors.
Polic:y
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
6.9:1 Develop parking and traffic control plans for those neighborhoods which
are adversely impacted by spillover parking and traffic (16.16, 16.26).
332
c
-
~
""....
'-'
-..I
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS
The following indicates the programs which shall be carried out by the City of San
Bernardino to implement the goals, objectives, policies and standards of the Crculation
Element. Each program is preceded by a capital "I" and a number which is referenced
by the pertinent policy which it implements in the preceding section.
16.1 Prepare Annual Five-Year Capital Improvement Pro~am
The Cty shall prepare an annual update to its Five-Year Capital
Improvement Program. This shall include the list of infrastructure
improvements intended to be implemented by the City over the next five-
year period, a priority ranking of those projects, and identification of the
available sources of funding to finance implementation of each
improvement project.
16.2 CeRSHlieH6R Design Standards
The Cty shall develop and publish eefts8'1ieaeR design standards for each
type of roadway facility shown on the Circulation Element PiHl:etieMl
Clll!lsiiieafteR Map Plan. These standards shall stipulate the required
right-of-way dedication, pavement width, pavement cross-section,
parkway treatment, median design where appropriate, maximum
allowable grades and radius of curvature, as determined appropriate by
the Director of Public Works/Cty Engineer. The Director of Public
Works/City Engineer shall, to the best of his ability, develop standards for
roadways in the City of San Bernardino which are compatible with the
standards established by adjacent jurisdictions and the County of San
Bernardino, and which take into consideration the recommended
standards published by the American Public Works Association, Institute
of Transportation Engineers, and State of California Department of
Transportation. These standards shall also take into consideration the
objectives and policies of the Urban Design Element regarding the
appropriate locations of median islands. At a minimum, these standards
shall be reviewed and updated once every five years.
16.3 Right-of-Way Dedication
Through the Site Plan Review process, the Cty shall require the
dedication of appropriate rights-of-way to allow for the construction of
roadways shown on the Circulation ElemeRt FtiRetieniH ClassifieaaeR
~ Plan in accordance with the roadway standards established by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
333
c
-
'-
.--.,
....)
...,....;
16.4 Access Standards
The City shall develop access standard guidelines for use in the Site Plan
Review process which specify appropriate locations for driveways in
relation to adjacent intersections and driveways, the minimum number
and size of driveways per site based on the level of intensity of
development, and appropriate locations for median openings to provide
left turns int%ut of driveways. These guidelines shall be developed by
the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and reviewed and updated at
least once every five years.
16.5 Traffic Signal Timinl: and Installation
As part of its annual Capital Improvement Program, the City shall review
the need for installation of additional traffic signals. The City shall also
allocate or seek funding (e.g., from the State of California Fuel Efficient
Traffic Signal Improvement Program) for the periodic evaluation of signal
timing in the City so as to maintain efficient signal phasing and timing
responsive to the current traffic volumes being experienced in the City.
16.6 Signal:e Standards
The City shall maintain signage standards compatible with those
published by the Federal Highway Administration in the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the State of California Department of
Transportation Traffic Manual. These standards shall also take into
consideration the objectives and policies of the Urban Design Element.
16.7 Infrastructure Cost Allocation IReimbursement Pro~ram
The City shall develop a program for the equitable allocation of costs of
infrastructure improvements amongst developments which generate the
need for said improvements and shall establish a program to reimburse
developers who pay more than their pro rata share of said costs at the
time of their project's development when additional funds are contributed
to the City by subsequent developers.
16.8 Traffic Systems Fee
The City of San Bernardino Municipal Code (Chapter 3.26) requires that
all new development and any substantial improvement which results in a
net increase in the number of vehicle trips generated by a development
pay a Traffic Systems Fee to the City to assist in financing improvements
to the City's traffic network. The City shall annually review the Traffic
Systems Fee to determine that it adequately reflects the current cost of
financing the traffic network improvements necessary to accommodate
334
c
~
v
--
~
j
the traffic generated by new developments and that it not exceed the pro
rata share of said developments for the cost of traffic system
improvements to which the fee will be applied.
16.9 Noise Barriers
The City shall develop a master plan of noise barriers identifying the
locations along existing and proposed freeways where sound walls are
desired by the City. The City shall negotiate with Caltrans for inclusion of
sound walls in future freeway improvement projects, consistent with the
master plan, and shall propose inclusion of San Bernardino sound wall
construction projects in the State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP). In addition, as part of the site plan review process for new
developments adjacent to existing or proposed freeway rights-of-way, the
City shall require the developer to construct appropriate sound walls. The
Oty shall consider including sound wall construction projects as part of
the City's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program.
16.10 Buffer Sensitive Land Use
As part of the site plan review process, the City shall encourage
developers to locate noise sensitive land uses away from heavily traveled
roadways through the provision of landscaped buffers between such uses
and the roadways.
16.11 Inter-Agency Coordination
City staff shall participate in meetings with other governmental agencies,
where practical, whenever program or policy discussions relating to
transportation facilities that would affect the City of San Bernardino are
being discussed.
16.12 Implement Land Use Element
The City shall implement the General Plan land use policies through
mechanisms such as revisions to the San Bernardino Municipal Code,
including revisions to the zoning map and zoning classifications and
adoption of development standards for various types of land uses,
including commercial and residential land uses.
16.13 Traffic Impact Analysis Standards
The Oty shall establish guidelines for the preparation of traffic impact
studies related to new developments in the City of San Bernardino. These
guidelines shall include, at a minimum, the methodology for calculating
trips generation by land use category, the methodology for calculating
335
c
~
'""'.
........
-..i
'owl
peak hour level of service, the approach to development of project trip
distribution assumptions and cumulative traffic projections. The
guidelines shall also establish the definition of a significant traffic impact
inc1udin~ downstream impacts and shall provide for the review and
approval by the City Engineer of all key assumptions to be utilized in the
traffic impact analysis prior to its completion.
16.14 Secondary Access Guidelines
The Director of Public Works/City Engineer shall develop guidelines for
use in the site plan review process which specify the requirements for
multiple access routes to development projects. These guidelines shall
include the maximum allowable length of a cul-de-sac (simple access
street) and the maximum number of dwelling units to be accommodated
by a single access route. These guidelines shall also establish the
parameters for design and use of emergency-access-only secondary access
routes.
16.15 Truck Routes
16.16
16.17
The City shall develop a truck route plan identifying which roadways will
be posted as designated truck routes and which roadways will be posted
with weight limit restrictions to discourage their use by heavy vehicles.
The truck route plan shall be reviewed and updated at least once every .
five years to respond to the changing pattern of development in the City.
Nei~hborhood Protection Plans
The City shall develop neighborhood protection plans for residential areas
of the City where traffic and parking intrusion from adjacent commercial
areas results in a significant negative impact on the residential character of
the neighborhood. Such plans shall be formulated with citizen input to
incorporate the desires of residents and shall address the following types
of mechanisms which might be appropriate for certain areas of the City:
traffic diverters, street closures, etc. The City shall adopt a procedure to:
(1) to define the boundaries of each neighborhood protection plan area, (2)
determine when such a pan is warranted, and (3) ascertain community
consensus amongst residents as to the specific proposals included in the
plan. __
^VY' cd.L<-u-A?
Hazardous Waste Ordinance
, Vi........ .:t ,:,<)
i'f- i.l.~""'- ' -
The City shall adopt an ordinance regulating the transportation of
hazardous waSte within the City. This ordinance shall defme materials
considered hazardous and/or toxic and designate the specific roadways
on which the transport of such materials is permitted as well as those on
336
c
c
::>
""\
....,I
which it is prohibited, either at all times or during certain hours of the
day. The hazardous waste- ordinance shall be consistent with the truck
route plan adopted by the City. r -
16.18 Pedestrian Master Plan
The City shall develop a master plan for pedestrian facilities in the City
which will address the needs for off-street pedestrian trails, locations
where sidewalks need to be improved (e.g., handicap ramps installed) or
constructed, areas of high pedestrian activity, and prioritize the locations
where improved pedestrian facilities are desired. The Pedestrian Master
Plan shall be consistent with the policies of the Land Use, Urban Design,
Parks and Recreation Elements of the Master Plan and shall be reviewed
annually as a source of input to the City's Five-Year Capital Improvement.
Program.
16.19 Equestrian Trail Master Plan
The City shall develop a Master Plan for equestrian trails which identifies
the appropriate locations for interconnected equestrian trail facilities. The
City will work with the National Forest Service, Army Corps of Engineers,
County Flood Control District, the State. of California, adjacent
jurisdictions, and private property owners to develop a master pllin which
links trails along the Santa Ana River, other flood control channels (where
feasible), and the foothills of the San Bernardino Mountains. The
Equestrian Trail Master Plan shall include procedures for dedication of
rights-of-way and for protection of rights-of-way until such time as they
are dedicated or purchased by the City or other public or private entity for
dedication.
16.20 Recreational Trails Committee
The City shall establish a recreational trails committee, whose members
shall be appointed by the Mayor and Council, to advise the Council in the
development of recreational trail facilities, including not only equestrian
trails, but also pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
16.21 Bicycle Master Plan
The City shall develop a master plan for bicycle facilities indicating where
bicycle routes, lanes and/or paths will be developed in the City. The plan
shall be developed to promote a safe bicycling environment and therefore
shall not encourage bicycle routes along major arterials but rather along
collector and local streets. The bicycle master plan shall be reviewed
annually as a source of input to the City's Five-Year Capital Improvement
Program.
337
c
,,-...,
\-I
o
..J
16.22 Transportation Demand Mana~ement Plan and Ordinance
In order to implement the numerous transportation demand management
policies included in the Circulation Element which are intended to reduce
the quantity of vehicular trips and trip length, the Oty shall develop a
Transportation Demand Management Plan and Ordinance containing
specific programs for implementation by the City as well as specific
requirements to be imposed on private developments as conditions of
project approval. The Plan and Ordinance shall be consistent with
regional policies of SCAG, SanBAG and the Air Quality Maintenance
Board. Measures to be considered during the preparation of the Plan and
Ordinance include, but are not limited to, the following:
. Retaining a Oty Transportation Coordinator to monitor, promote
and coordinate tranSit/ride-sharing programs and other
transportation demand management (TOM) programs among
employees (particularly those with less than 100 employees) and
residents.
. Requiring developers of commercial developments to prepare and
submit TOM plans to the Oty as a condition of approval.
. Specify goals for the reduction of single-occupant automobile trips
generated by developments, consistent with the regulations of the
Air Quality Maintenance District, and establish performance
criteria and penalties for non-attainment of said goals.
. Incorporate transportation demand management objectives into the
site plan review process, such as preferential parking or ride-share
vehicles, locations for transit, car-pool/van-pool passenger loading
areas, bicycle storage facilities, etc.
. Establishment of a dedicated shuttle system to connect the Tri-
Oty/Commerce Center area to the downtown and provide
connections to the regional commercial centers along the E Street
corridor and commercial office developments along Waterman
Avenue. This will be the responsibility of Omnitrans with coopera-
tion by the City.
. Locate park-and-ride facilities in the Oty either on public property
(e.g., Caltrans right-of-way at freeway interchanges) or on private
property (e.g., shopping center parking lots) where agreements can
be negotiated with the property owner for temporary use of the
parking for a park-and-ride facility.
338
c
,-'
-"
.'-'
.....;
'-"
~ Utility PlaR RweWy-iev;
The Direeter of Paslie V.Tarl~s/City lZagiaeer shall reW;ie,\. aE;~:elepmeftt
prepoaa1s as part sf t:he sHe plan review;l profess 8ftB. &fJprave ~e plM\3 fur
l;laliBes, iR leans of 1ileir laeatioR Me si:2e, prier ~ isstlaftoc af a building
pefmit.
16.24 Railroad Grade Crossing Separations
The City shall annually review operations of at-grade railroad crossings,
in terms of number of daily railroad operation, average daily traffic
volume on the roadway, and accident history during the past year, to
determine which crossings warrant consideration for grade separation.
The City shall submit applications to the State for funding of such
crossings when appropriate and shall consider the inclusion of railroad
grade separations as candidate projects for the City's Five-Year Capital
Improvement Program.
16.25 Norton Air Base Access Study
Should it be proposed that Norton Air Base be operated as a joint-use
military and commercial aviation facility, the City shall require that a
ground access study be prepared by the project proponents to
demonstrate that adequate access can be provided to the airport site and
to provide a mechanism for financing the improvements necessary to
provide such access.
16.26 . Development Code Parking Requirements
The City shall review the parking requirements included in the City's
Development Code for all land use categories, at least once every five
years, to either confirm that they adequately reflect current demands or
adjust them to reflect current demand. Empirical data shall be utilized
where available to determine current parking demands by land use type
in the City of San Bernardino. Otherwise, the City Traffic Engineer shaln
conduct a review of the parking requirements currently in force in at least I.
20 other California cities comparable to San Bernardino to determine the !
current standards of practice in the State regarding parking requirements.
The City's parking requirements shall be established as no lower than the
average of the requirements of the 20 cities surveyed.
16.27 Parking Standards
The Director of Public Works/City Engineer shall develop and publish
parking facility design standards to which all new developments in the
City must conform in the design of their parking facilities. These
339
c
c
-
....,)
"'j
.....r!
standards shall at a minimum include minimum stall, aisle and driveway
dimensions for alternative parking configurations, specify the allowable
percentage of compact car spaces, address the minimum requirements for
landscaping of surface parking lots, specify the maximum allowable
grades and minimum widths of ramps between floors in parking
structures, and specify the dimensions for non-standards car spaces (e.g.,
handicapped, compact, ride-share).
16.28 Parkin~ Districts
The City shall maintain the existing Central City Parking District and shall
periodically review the need to expand the District or create additional
parking districts in areas of the City where either adequate off-street
parking has not been provided by developments approved in previous
years under prior development codes, or in areas where the City desires to
encourage consolidated parking facilities rather than parking facilities at
each individual development. The City shall consider alternative
mechanisms for the financing of parking district facilities, including but
not limited to Parking Revenue Bonds, Capital Improvement Program
funding, Special Assessment Districts, Redevelopment Tax increment
financing, General Obligation Bonds, or in-lieu fee programs.
16.29 Parking In-lieu Fee Pro~am
The City shall continue to provide an in-lieu fee option for developments
located in City Parking Districts. The City shall annually review the
program to set the appropriate level of the in-lieu fee based upon the
current cost of providing parking facilities and the specific plans for new
parking facilities in the District.
16.30 Parking Demand Analysis
The City shall. establish an ordinance requiring that whenever a proposal
is made to provide less than the full code requirement of parking for each
individual land use on the proposed development site that a parking
demand analysis be submitted to the City Traffic Engineer for review and
approval by the proponent of the development. The parking demand
analysis must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by
the City Traffic Engineer as part of the site plan approval process prior to
issuance of a building permit. The City Traffic Engineer shall develop and
publish guidelines for the content of the parking demand. analysis
stipulating the acceptable methodology to be utilized in its preparation.
340