Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout53-Development Services Arturo Delgado, Ed.D. Superintendent March 14,2008 Valerie Ross, Director Development Services San Bernardino City Planning Commission 300 North "0" Street, 3rd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92418 Dear Valerie: It is our understanding that the Planning Commission will be making a recommendation to the City Council relative to the Wilson II Project, and we would like an opportunity to prepare our rationale for the great need for this school to proceed in this area. In order to do this we are requesting an extension of the timeframe for the City Council to respond to our letter of February 8, 2008 written by Mr. Wael Elatar relative to this project. We also respectfully request a continuance of the City Council meeting of April 7. Thank you for your consideration. 0;0 ARTURO DELG Superintendent AD:mbg Cc: Mayor Patrick Morris -Re-ucAuL p~ #3) 03-/7-D8 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT 777 North F Street. San Bernardino. CA 92410' (909) 381-1240 . fax (909) 885-6392 . O=?II+I Ot? Vlt-- arturo.delgado@sbcusd.kI2.ca.us c CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO-REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Dept: Valerie C. Ross, Director Development Services Subject: Request from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for a determination of consistency with the City General Plan for development of the site proposed for Wilson II Elementary School. Date: March 6, 2008 MCC Date: March 17,2008 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: August 1, 2005 - The Mayor and Common Council considered the sites proposed for development of Monterey II, Alessandro II, Burbank II and Wilson II Elementary Schools. The Mayor and Council determined that development of Wilson II Elementary School as proposed would not be consistent with the General Plan. The other school sites were determined to be consistent with the General Plan. Recommended Motion: That the Mayor and Common Council find that land acquisition and development of the site ,- proposed for Wilson II Elementary School would not be consistent with the General Plan. \,..... c y~t.'R~ Valerie C. Ross Contact person: Terri Rahha1. City Planner Phone: 384-5057 Supporting data attached: StaffRenort Warcl(s): 7 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Descritltion) Finance: Council Notes: _I_~~ ", . ~ Page 2 of2 c CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Request from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for a detenninationof consistency with the City General Plan for development of the site proposed for Wilson II Elementary School. Applicant: San Bernardino City Unified School District 777 N. "F" Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 909-381-1100 BACKGROUND: The site proposed by the San Bernardino City Unified School District (District) for development of Wilson II Elementary School is bO\U1ded by 26th Street on the north, Arrowview Middle School on the south, "F" Street on the east and "G" Street on the west. In 2005, the Mayor and Council determined that development of Wilson II Elementary School at this location would not be consistent with the General Plan. Since then, the District has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In a letter dated February 8, 2008, the District submitted another request for a finding of consistency with the City General Plan. The item was presented to the Planning Commission on March 4, 2008. All pertinent background information and analysis is attached in the March 4, 2008 staff report to the Planning Commission as Exhibit 1. The District's Draft EIR for Wilson II Elementary School is appended on a compact disk as Exhibit 2. On March 4, 2008, the Planning Commission referred this item to the Mayor and Council with a recommendation that the Mayor and Council determine that development of Wilson II Elementary School at the site proposed by the District would not be consistent with the General Plan. The vote of the Planning Commission was unanimous, with Commissioners Coute, Dailey, Heasley, Mulvihill and Sauerbrun present. Commissioners Hawkins, Longville, Muiioz and Rawls were absent. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION That the Mayor and Common Council find that land acquisition and development of the site proposed for Wilson II Elementary School would not be consistent with the General Plan. EXlllBITS: 1 March 4, 2008 Planning Commission Staff Report 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report for Wilson II Elementary School (CD) ,~ ,,~;, ~ ~r EXHIBIT 1 C SUMMARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DMSION o c CASE: General Plan Consistency Determination for the Proposed Wilson II Elementary School 3 March 4, 2008 7 AGENDA ITEM: HEARING DATE: WARD: OWNER: Various APPLICANT: San Bernardino City Unified School District 777 N. "F" Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 909-381-1 JOO REQUESTILOCATION: A request from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for a determination that land acquisition and development of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School would be consistent with the City General Plan. The site is approximately 8.5 acres, bounded by "F" Street on the east, "G" Street on the west, 26th Street on the north and Arrowview Middle School on the south, in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district. CONSTRAlNTS/OVERLA YS: None ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: Ii1I Not Applicable o Exempt, Previously approved Negative Declaration o No Significant Effects o Potential Effects, Mitigation Measures and Mitigation MonitoringIReporting Plan STAFF. RECOMMENDATION: o Approval o Conditions Ii1I Denial Recommendation to MCC o Continuance to: c c c General Plan Consistency Determination Wilson II Elementary School Site Planning Commission Hearing Date: 314108 Page 2 REQUEST ~ LOCATION The San Bernardino City Unified School District (District) has requested a determination from the Planning Commission that land acquisition and development of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School would be consistent with the City General Plan (Attachment A). The subject 8.5-acre site is located at the southeast corner of 26th Street and "G" Street, adjacent to the northern boundary of Arrowview Middle School in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district. SETTING AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site proposed for development of Wilson II Elementary School is located in an existing single-family residential neighborhood. There are 40 single family residences on the site, built mainly in the 1920's and the 1930's. 29 of the homes have been identified as potentially significant historic structures. Land uses surrounding the site include: North: Residential uses in the RS district. South: Arrowview Middle School East: Residential uses in the RS district. West: Residential uses in the RS district. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) The determination of consistency with the City General Plan is not a project subject to CEQA. The District is the lead agency for the proposed project of land acquisition and development of the Wilson II school site. The District has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Wilson II project (Attachment B). Staffhas reviewed the DEIR and submitted a comment letter (Attachment C). BACKGROUND State Law requires a local school district contemplating acquisition and development of a new school site to request a determination from the planning agency with jurisdiction that development of a school at the proposed site would be consistent with the local agency's General Plan. If the planning agency finds that the proposed school project would not be consistent with the General Plan, the district may overrule the finding and go forward with the school development project with a 2/3 majority vote of its governing board. The District submitted a General Plan Consistency Determination request to the City for the proposed Wilson II site in 2005. The Planning Commission tabled the item and the Mayor and Common Council found that development of Wilson II Elementary School as proposed would not be consistent with the General Plan. Staff reports to the Planning Commission and Mayor and Common Council and other materials related to the 2005 General Plan Consistency Determination are compiled in Attachment D. General Plan Consistency Determination Wilson II Elementary School Site Planning Commission Hearing Date: 3/4/08 Page 3 c ANALYSIS/CONCLUSION In the request for a new determination of General Plan Consistency (Attachment A) the District calls attention to the new information presented in the DEIR (Attachment B). Staff does not find any new information in the DEIR that would change the analysis and recommendations concerning the Wilson II Elementary School project as presented in the staff reports prepared in 2005 (Attachment D). In fact, the DEIR acknowledges that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan, and concludes that this conflict with the General Plan constitutes a significant enviromnental impact with no feasible mitigation, requiring the School Board to adopt overriding considerations in order to approve the project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward the request for a General Plan Consistency Determination for the Wilson II Elementary School site to the Mayor and Common Council, with a recommendation to fmd the proposed school site is not consistent with the General Plan. Respectfully submitted, C VditNv &?>>v' Valerie C. Ross Director of Development Services 7/JL/ Terri Rahhal Deputy Director/City Planner Attachment D Letter dated February 8, 2008 from the San Bernardino City Unified School District, requesting a General Plan Consistency Determination Draft Enviromnental Impact Report (OEIR) for the proposed Wilson II Elementary School (CD) City Comment Letter dated February 14, 2008, regarding the Wilson II Elementary School DEIR. Background Documents concerning the General Plan Consistency Determination of 2005. Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C c c c ATTACHMENT A ..~ ..,.~_,,_4+ SAN BERNARDINO CIlY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Arturo Delgado, Ed.D. Superintendent John A. Peukert, Assistant Superintendent, Facilities/Operations February 8, 2008 Valerie Ross, Director Development Services Department City of San Bemardino 300 North "0" Street, 3'" Floor San Bemardino, Califomia 92418 Re: Request for Planning Commission Interpretation Request for General Plan Conformity Finding based on Additional Technical Reports The San Bemardino City Unified School District (SBCUSD) is formally resubmitting the proposed Wilson II Elementary School to the Planning Commission having jurisdiction where the proposed school is to be located. We include supplemental information to our June 9, 2005 previous Notice and to the subsequent hearing held on July 19, 2005. As you are probably aware, the District conducted a Scoping Session with the City in early 2007 and held a formally noticed Scoping Meeting at Arrowview Middle School on February 8, 2007. Comments were received and considered in preparation of the Draft EIR enclosed herewith. Further, a formally noticed Draft EIR Public Hearing was held at Arrowview Middle School on January 31, 2008. We are requesting that the Planning Commission provide written findings to the District stating the site is in conformity with the jurisdiction's adopted General Plan. The proposed project site is bounded by 26'" Street to the north, F Street to the east, G Street to the west and Arrowview Middle School to the south in the City of San Bemardino. The approximately 8.5 acre project site includes 40 existing single family residential units and an approximately 31,000 square foot vacant lot. The jurisdiction's General Plan designates the subject site as Residential Suburban (RS). The enclosed Final Draft Environmental Impact Report includes additional reports including a Traffic Report and Parking Study that includes a number of mitigation measures for circulation. These reports also document that parking will be sufficient for the new school and not overlap with demands from the neighboring Arrowview Middle School. Additionally, the District will modify enrollment at the Arrowview Middle School by relocating all 6'" grade students to their home schools and the new Wilson II campus. This will further mitigate traffic impacts in the vicinity due to relocation of approximately 300 students at Arrowview Middle School. Your prompt attention to this request for review and recommendation is appreciated. If there are any questions or need for further information, please contact me at (909) 381-1238. ®RAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WILSON II E~EMENTARIr SCHOOL CITY OF SAN ~ERNAR®INo SCH 2OD6`I 11 ~D5 -~,. . SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 777 North F Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 Contact: Jorge Mendez Project Manager 909-381-1238 ext. 4193 Prepared by: I~LEINFELDER 1220 Research Drive, Suite B Redlands, CA 92374 Cor<tact: John Westermeier 909-3?6-4fi17" December 200? Wilsan ff Elementary School DraftEnvironmental Impact Report December, 2007 TALE ®F C®NTENTS 5~ctions Page; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 1. INTRODUGTION .............................................................................1--1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE----• .............................................................1-1 1.2 INTENDED USE OF EIR ...............................................................................1-1 1.3 ORGANIZATION AND SCOPE ......................•----------------=---..........................1-2 1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS .................................•--.--.....----.----.1-3 1.5 IMPACT TERMINOLOGY-------------•----••--•.......................................................1-4 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......--•---------------•-------------------...........................................2-1 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION ........................................................•---•-----.................2-1 2.2 LOCAL AND REGIONAL SETTING ..............................................................2-1 2.3 OBJECTIVES AND THE PLANNING PROCESS ..........................................2-3 2.4 DESGRIPTION OF PROPOSED FACILITY ..................................................2-4 2.5 REC~UIRED DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS, PERMITS AND APPROVALS ....---~---------• .....................................................2-7 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS .3-1 3.1 AESTHETICS ................................................................................................3-1 3.2 AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................-•---...3-1 3.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................................................3-10 3.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES .........................................~------------------------........3-11 3.5 GEOLOGY AND SO(LS .........................................•----------------.....................3-13 3.6 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIAL .................................................3-16 3.7 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .......................................................3-20 3.8 LAND USE AND PLANNING ..................................................................•----3-21 3.9 MINERAL. RESOURCES .--------•--------------~---------•---.......................................3-22 3.10 NOISE .................................................................................~----------.............3-22 3.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING -•------• ..........................................................3-28 3.12 PUBLIC SERVICES .............................................................~-•------------------...3-28 3.13 PUBLIC UTILITIES ......................................................................................3-29 3.14 RECREATION ..................................•----------~----------.....................................3-30 3.15 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION ......................................................:....3-31 4. ALTERNTIVE ANALYSIS ..................................................................................•-----.4-1 4.1 AESTHETICS ...............................................................~-----------.....................4-1 4.2 AIR QUALITY .................................................................................•--~-----------4-2 4.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .........................................................................4--8 4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES ..........................................................................4-10 4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS---~-----------~----------• ....................................................4-14 4.6 HAZARDS AND MATERIALS ......................................................................4-17 4.7 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .......................................................4-20 4.8 LAND USE AND PLANNING ..................................~-•------•---------------............4-23 4.9 MINERAL RESOURCES ------------..4-26 4.10 NOISE -------------------------------------------------•----...................................................4-27 4.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING ...................................................................4-30 Page i of iii Wilson I! Elementary Schoo! Draft ~'nvironmenta! Impact f:eport December, 207 TABLE OF CONTEfVTS (Continued) Sections pace 4.12 PUBLIC SERVICES ............................••--•--------------......................................4-31 4.'13 PUBLIC UTILITIES ......................................................................................4-33 4.14 RECREATION .............................................................................................4-36 4.15 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION ...........................................................4-37 5. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS .....5-'! 5.1 AESTHESTICS .....................................•-------------...:.......................................5-1 5.2 AIR QUALITY ..........................................................•---------------......................5-1 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .............................................................~-----------5-2 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................•------•---•------..............5-2 5.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS-------------------•........:.........................................--~--------5-2 5.6 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................5-3 5.7 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .........................................................5-3 5.8 LAND USE AND PLANNING ................................•-----------.............................5-4 5.9 MINERAL RESOURCES---• ...........................................................................5-4 5.1€~ POPULATION AND HOUSING .....................................................................5-4 5.11 PUBLIC SERVICES...._...----• ..............................................................•-----~-----5-5 5.12 NOISE .................................................•-••------------..........................................5-5 5.13 RECREATION ------~ ........................................................................................5-5 5.14 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION .............................................................5-6 5.15 UTiLIT1ES--------------------------•............................................---.....----------..._.........5-6 6. ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS ..........................................~------•-...................................6-1 6.1 INTRODUCTION ............................•------•------------........................................---6-1 . 6.2 NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ..........................•----------------.--......................6-1 G.3 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL SITES ...................................................................G-1 6.4 EXPANSION OF WILSON ISITE .................................................••-.-............6-4 6.5 COLLOCATION ON ARROWVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE .......................5-4 6.fi EXPANSION OF EXISTING SCHOOL S1TES ...............................................6-5 6.7 SMALLER PROJECT SITE --------------•------------..........--------...---------.............-----6-5 6.8 CHANGES 1N SCHOOL OPERATIONS ........................................................6-6 6.9 COMPARISON OF FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE ........................6-6 7. LONG TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROJECT ..................................................7-1 7.1 SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS............7-1 7.2 GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS OF PROPOSED PROJECT ......................7-1 7.3 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES WHICH WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED .................................................7-1 8. PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED ..................8-1 8.1 REPORT PREPARERS....._..----• ....................................................................8-1 8.2 ORGANIZATION AND PERSONS CONSULTED .........................................8-2 9. REFERENCES .........................................................................................................9-1 Page ii of iii Wilson !f Elementary Sclaoo! Draft Environments! impact Deport December, 207 - TABLE C)F CONTENTS {Continued} Sections Paae List of Tables Table 2.31 Projected Enrollment Wilson Elementary School Attendance Area ............2-4 Table 3.2-1 Ambient Air Quality Standards ....................................................................3-7 Table 3.2-2 San Bernardino Air Quality Date - 2001 through 2005 ...............................3-9 Table 3.2--3 Summary of Emissions by Major Source Category: 2002 Base Year, Average Annual Date {tons per day) ...............................................3-10 Table 3.fi-1 Summary of Results from Database Review .............................................3-16 Table 3.10-1 State of California General Plan Guidelines Community Noise Criteria for Land Use Compatibility .................................................3-26 Table 3.15--1 Level of Service Descriptions for Uninterrupted Traffic Flows ...................3-33 -Table 3.15-2 Level of Service Descriptions for Intersections .........................................3-34 Table 3.15-3 Intersection Analysis for Existing Conditions .............................................3-37 Table 4.2-1 Estimated Area Source and Operational Vehicular Emissions (Pounds per Day .:.......................................................................................4-4 Table 4.2-2 Estimated Construction Emissians ...........................:..................................4--8 Table 4.2-3 Estimated Construction Emissions with Implementation of Mitigation Measures ................................................................................4-7 -Table 4.15-1 Trip Generation ..................................•----------•-------------..............................4-39 Table 4.15-2 2010 Intersection Levels of Service (With and Without Project)----------------4-40 Table 4.15-3 2030 Intersection Levels of Service (With and Without Project) ................4-41 List of Figures Figure 2.1-1 Vicinity Map--------------------------------------------------~------................-----..........------...2-2 Figure 2.4-1 Plot Plan ......................................................................................................2-5 Figure 2.4-2 Project Elevations .......................•----------------------------------•---.........................2-6 Figure 3.1-1 Site Photagraph ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3-2 Figure 3.1-2 Site Photograph ..............................................~--------~----------........................3-3 Figure 3.10-1 Typical Noise Levels ...........................................................................•-----3--24 Figure 3.15-1 Existing Streets and Intersections .............................................................3-32 Figure 3.15-2 Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls ....................................3-35 Figure 3.15-3 Existing Average Daily Traffic in Study Area .............................................3-36 Figure 4.15-1 2010 Interim Year Without Project Average Daily Traffic ..........................3--40 Figure 4.15-2 2010 Interim Year With Project Average Daily Traffic ...............................3-41 Figure 4.15-3 2030 Interim Year Without Project Average Daily Traffic ..........................3-42 Figure 4.15-4 2030 Interim Year With Project Average Daily Traffic ..............................:3-43 Figure 6.3-1 Alternative Site Locations ............................................................................5-2 Page iii of iii Wilson Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 20p7 '[.°i Background and Purpoae This Environmental Impact Report {EIR) provides an analysis of the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed land acquisitian, demolition of existing structures and the construction of the Wilson II Elementary School in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County, California. The EIR analysis focuses nn potential impacts associated with construction and nperafion of the new high school. The EIR provides an analysis of potential impacts resulting from project implementation. In addition to site-specific impacts that relate fix development of the project itself, the EIR assn analyzes the cumulative effect of the project, when considered with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects in the surrounding area or region that create similar impacts. This EIR has been prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA) to evaluate the environmental effects of the proposed land acquisitian and construction of the new Wilson 11 Elementary School. San Bernardino City Unified School District (SBCUSD), acting as the lead agency, has prepared this Draft EIR to provide the public and responsible and trustee agencies with information about the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. As described in CEQA Guidelines Section 1512'1{a), "an EIR is an informational document which will inform public agency decision makers and the public generally of the significant environmental effects of the project, identify possible ways fio minimize the significant effects, and describe reasonable alternatives to the project. The public agency shall consider the information in the EIR along with other information which may be presented fio fihe agency. CEQA requires the preparation of an EIR prior to approving any "project" which may have a significant effect on the environment. Far the purposes of CEQA, the term "project" refers to the whole of an action, which has the potentia! far resulting in a direct physical change or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment {CEQA Guidelines Section (15378(x)). With respect to the proposed project, SBCUSD has defiermined the development is a "project" within the definition of CEQA, and that it has the potential to result in significant environmental effects. 1.2 Intended Use of EpR. This EIR will be used by the SBCUSD as CEQA Lead Agency to consider the environmental impacts of the proposed project prior to making a decision whether or not to approve the proposed project or an alternative to the proposed project including the No Project alternative. This document will be used by the California Department of Education {CDE) as a Responsible Agency to consider approval of the funding of the proposed school. 1 1 Wilson i1 Elementary School Drat Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 1.3 4rganiizati®n and scope This Draft EIR is organized as follows: Executive Summary- This section summarizes the conclusions of the EIR. Section fi.11- Infroducfion. Section 1.0 provides an introduction and overview describing the intended use of this EiR and the review and certification process. Section 2.0 -Project Description. This section provides a detailed description of the proposed project, including intended objectives, background information, and physical and technical characteristics of the proposed project. Section 3.0 --Existing Conditions. Section 3.0 contains an analysis of the existing environmental setting that serves as a baseline upon which to analyze environmental impacts. Section 4.0 -Environmental Analysis. This section examines project impacts and identifies mitigation measures for significant impacts. Section 5.0 _ Cumulafive Impacts Summary. This section examines impacts that are individually not significant, but become significant when combined with the effects of other projects or existing uses. Section &.0 -Alternatives Analysis. CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 requires that an EIR describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project that could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project and avoid and/or lessen the environmental effects of the project. This alternatives analysis provides a comparative analysis between the project and the selected alternatives. Alternatives considered but rejected are also identified and rationale for their elimination is provided. Section 7.0 -Long-Term Implications of the Projeef_ This section examines a variety of topics that are required by state law, including significant environmental effects, growth inducing impacts and secondary effect of growth, and significant irreversible environmental changes. Section 8.(1-Report Preparers. This section lists the authors and individuals consulted by name, title, and company or agency affiliation who assisted in the preparation of the report. Section 9.0 -References. Technical Appendices. Technical appendices to this report include technical studies that the impact analysis is based upon and other information. Technical appendices to this EIR include materials from the Notice of Preparation, the Traffic Study and the Parking Studies, a cultural resource appendix and air quality modeling results. 9-2 Wilson !l Elementary School Draft Environmenfal lmpacf Report December, 2007' 1.4 Enrrir®nmental Rerriew Pr®ces~ Nance of Preparation and lnitiai Study (Already Completed) In accordance with Section 15082 of the CEQA Guidelines, SBCUSD prepared a NOP for an EIR (which has already begun circulating far review by the public and other agencies). SBCUSD was identified as the lead agency for the proposed project. The NOP is shown in Appendix A. This notice was circulated to the public, local, State, and Federal agencies, and other interested parties to solicit comments on the proposed project. Draft EIR (This document) This document constitutes the Draft EIR (DEIR). The DEIR contains a description of the project, description of the environmental setting, identification of project impacts, and mitigation measures far impacts found to be significant, as well as an analysis of project alternatives... Upart completion of the DEIR, SBCUSD will file the Notice of Completion (NOC) with the State Office of Planning and Research and the San Bernardino County Clerk to begin the public review period (Public Resources Code, Section 21161). Public Notice/Public Reviev~r Concurrent with the NOC, SBCUSD will provide public native of the availability of the DEIR for public review, and invite comment from the general public, agencies, organizations, and other interested parties. The public review and comment period is 45 days. Public comment on the DEIR will be accepted in written farm. Although na public hearing to accept comments on the EIR are required by CEQA, all comments,or questions regarding the DEIR should be addressed to: Mr. Wael Elatar Facilities Management San Bernardino City Unified School District 777 North "F" Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 Response to Comments/Final E1R {Future step) Following the public review period, a Final EIR (FEIR) will be prepared. The FEIR will respond to written comments received during the public review period. The SBCUSD will review and consider the FEIR prior to deciding whether to certify the FEIR. Certification of the E1R/Praject Consideration (Future step) If SBCUSD finds that the FEIR is "adequate and complete", SBCUSD may certify the FEiR. The rule of adequacy generally holds that the EIR can be certified if 1) it shows a good faith effort at full disclosure of environmental information; and 2) provides sufficient analysis to allow decisions to be made regarding the project in contemplation of its environmental consequences. Upon review and consideration of the FEIR, SBCUSD may act upon the project. A decision to approve the project would be accompanied by written findings in accordance with CEQA Guidelines 'Section 15091 and, if applicable, Section 15093. SBCUSD would also adopt a 11/litigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), as described below, far mitigation measures that have been incorporated into or imposed upon the project to reduce or avoid significant effects on the environment. This MMRP will be designed to ensure that these measures are carried out during project implementation. 1-3 Wilson Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 Mifigation Monitoring (Future step) CEQA Section 2'1089.6(a) requires Eead agencies to adapt a MMRP to describe measures which have been adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects o~ the environment. The specific "reporting or monitoring" program required by CEQA is not required to be included in the EIR, however it will be presented to the SBCUSD Board for adoption. Throughout the EIR, however, mitigation measures have been clearly identified and presented in language that will facilitate establishment of a monitoring and reporting program. Any mitigation measures adopted by SBCUSD Board as conditions for approval of the project will be included in a MMRP to verify compliance. °f.5 Impact Terrain®~®9Y This Draft EIR uses the following terminology to describe environmental effects of the proposed project: Standards of Significance: A set of criteria used by the lead agency to determine at what level or "threshold"` an impact would be considered significant. Significance criteria used in the Draft EIR include the CEQA Guidelines, factual or scientific information, regulatory performance standards of local, state, and federal agencies, and applicable County goals, objectives, and policies. Significant lmpacf: A significant impact includes effects that exceed established or defined thresholds. l=or example, noise levels that exceed local noise level standards would be considered a significant adverse impact. Less than Significant Impact: A less than significant impact includes effects that are perceptible, but do not exceed established or defined thresholds. For example, alterations in the development intensity of a site would be noticeable but would not necessarily represent a significant change in land use compatibility, especially if the Proposed Project is consistent with Ivcal development standards. iVo Impact: A Proposed Project with no impact will have na perceptible effect on the resources in question. ~-~ Wilson Elementary School Drat Environmental Impact Report ©ecember, 2007 ~R~~~~~ 2.1 Pr®je~t Lacati®n The proposed project site is located in the City of San Bernardino. Figure 2.1-1 places the project site within a regional perspective and also further defines the site location. The project site consists of 41 (40 homes and one vacant lot) parcels and comprises approximately 370,260 square feet or 8.7 acres. The proposed project site is located adjacent to the existing Arrowview Middle School on the south. It is bounded by 26t~' Street on the north, "G" Street on the west, and "F°' Street on the east_ Berkeley Avenue traverses the center portion of the site in a north-south direction and 25th Street traverses southern portion of the site in an east-west direction. 2.2 Local and Regional betting 2.2.1 Regional Setting The proposed project is located within the northwestern portion of the City of San Bernardino. The site is located in the northern portion of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California near the boundary with the Transverse Ranges Province to the north_ The Peninsular Range Geomorphic Province is characterized by northwest trending mountains and geologic structures and lies in the San Bernardino Valley. Elevations in this area range up to about '1,100 feet above mean sea level. Interstate 215, State Route 66 and State Route 30 provide regional access to the site. Highland Avenue is the major east-west trending street in the area and Waterman Avenue is the major north-south sfireefi in the area. 2.2.2 Local Setting With the exception of the Arrowview Middle School to the south, primarily single-family residential units surround the proposed project site. The area is considered suburban residential in the City of San Bernardino Draft General Plan with Residential zoning. 2.2.3 Site Conditions The proposed project site cans'rsts of 41 parcels of land. This includes 40 single family residential units and an approximately 31,000 square foot vacant lot. Other uses on the approximately 8.7 acre site include portions of Berkeley Avenue and 25~'' Street. The site is considered a typical single-family residential area with large trees and generally well-kept properties. 2µ1 6awyayp 'wd0£:8'LOOZ ~sW bZ :O3llOld 6mP't-l-Z :3WHN 3lld LLbb9 'ON 103fO2id wo~~~apla;ula;N'miusn b'IN23OdI1V0'ONIOaVN2i38 NNS LO/£Z/£0 bZ£t-06£ ~606)'XHd 5££0-96£ X606) "Hd 1OR11S1O lOOHOS 431dINn AllO ONI023HN2339 NVS ~A8 O3hO2lddV ~31HO 59LL6 HO `~aB Puoweld IOOHOS J.2JV1N3W31311 NOS'lIM 2JBI9W2131S3M'f :A9 O3NOHH0 05 L a;ing `anup e}sln Eape/\ OL£ L A3N2)HVd ~O ~/.8 O3SI/\32i ddW Ajt~f~On ~j0s A3N21HYd 'O :A9 NMH23O aan~ld p ) T ,(^ 7l 3 V I tJ X ~ N r!f r~ f ~ I~ ~ Y- il~flp~~~ 1 ~ t j t ~ 'i~ 3 I~ ~1 ~ 1 I ~' JJ``~ 1 /1~ I ~ I ; ii J /~ l 1L ~h J a it _ ~ ~ q~( t I`~i~~ ~ L ~ W i ~ ~ ~, ~ ( ~r it ~I ~ I i A E lr I ¢I( ~ ~ - ~ i l ~ t ,z>~ ( z~( 1` t I less ads ~ s v I ~ E P t I-L^ ~ ea ere fi i or r 1. ~ J~ ~ ~f ~ ~ ' ~ NJJ ~ ~ 1~ 9 II ~1ik ~ 3-7 1~;~ ~ i ~ ~ r I' ~ ° i( 1~ ~ ~ r ~~r\ .=.,.1 ~ ~ %r'( ~1y1 a~n"1~ `}(n ',L+azry`fi i~ 1.. : 1 1'~~ r ~I- l~l m~~,- I ~ j~' ~~in t}~~a ~ I~ _1G ~ll%C ~ ~ ~ ~ i~v t~(~ 1l L~ ~il_&;_ c ~ '-~~ ' ~ ' h ) f =~I ~ l~ ~C`~lv __1(~ i'~ ~~~.'-`l~~`~j ``,~ ~ ~f fir ~" T.J ' t y9 .'~rf l~~~it9 , ~ 1@~ i'~ ~!C ~ _`v ~14ip~ ~_1 1 ~ ~ 3~ t~ ~ ; ~ o I ? ~ T` / C t ~~' ~ ~'~j~(~ t~A (t 1'a` ~f'C~1 i~ It_ ~1;~ } l+1 j~~~ ixs r IS~~ ~ a i I~ ( i ll ~ ~r - r ~ r f ~ ~ 1s ~ ~'ri s r ~ - - ~i ova ~, rr {tt ~ ~ /f~~-~{~r;1~~ " ~ w ~ I I ~ ~ = ~, ~ ~c x JJJ +1 ~~y ~ -~ v r"~.`~ o r t~~l ~7 1 ~ ~mw Olr ~ ;'.rte ~/i J. ~ . ry 5: y~t~ ~~~, m H:. i _~.`-~ { A J / /"-1 a vo ~ , it /ri~~ ~ 1, ~li~~ f ~ uy~%Ni~J, ~ ~)1}, j ;-'~~~,\ 1 ~ ~ ~ j ~~a~l ~ ~~i a ~ r ~ r Vii, ai n~ ~ i , o } ~ ~ ~ ~y( ~ ~ I /' r ~ S~'~, ~ t r ~r tI u t ~,i ~ ~ ~~,~ tiro-_i~j ~!r~l\r~ ~l ~ 1 J.=.1 (r ~lI ~~' .1 ~Ir`~ ' r t `r~ti` "~' '1 ~- --I ~ ~a /~/ ` '; " %' " r~1~ a ¦ j ° ` ~, ~ ~ '~~,?j~, ~,~ ,~~ "`. ~ ~ fig ~ _ ~i ? 7'~ ~w~ ~ ~ 7( o~ ~ Q ' „A.~,~~,..a.,.,~-,a-.f~~l. _.~-. .,r,~_. ,~v.~av Ipp, 7. 1L ..:-.k:~ °"E. t. ~,~ n _ ,.m R.~~~eE-~';R~ y ~~~4'Y;~ r`''ye. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ a m~Y~ ~r t ~`~L~Z'E v ~ ~ ,f ~ry ffi,r~~q ;~4 ;~'Q j i'~i".1 l 5 ~'`"^~.._ ~a ® ti,~{ry~l w~. ~vY ~ ~ ~4 ~3;ki ° - \ t ~ I ~ ~ ~~.;t-av ~'~ r 3 ~ ° _ ~ ~ 4 6 ~ \yl' ~ Yak" p 4 'N'. a "~, +E c3 ~ g`4.~ s~.s Jj, Q W6 'fit \,YIL ~,"; Z! Y~'4T5. ~pp ,~?T~ ~ v~R Q N ,~> ., ~i B~ S ti~ i' ' N Z ~ C 1 ~ y~, ~4 wt ) ~ ~uw~~'x~7 ~ ~ g m av gem ~ i~~~ r `y°s~"C'~~i 1 Ya § ~ - ai.> ~ i ~ .v 6 pi's o F t 8 J S' ~`'., y „ ~~Me gx ~ ~ ~t ~- ~,-,~ tai ~' _ , ( t 0 ~~,~'..~ ~, h ~ , R pM. ~ ~ ~ -; ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ Y m a ~ .-. ~ tom. 'V _ a~. nr '~~ V r._ _-~\:. '°z ~ a O LLx~I :1nOAHl \LLbb9\OOHO\LOOZ1:l :3lId OVO fO2Id90\500Z\a-ald :Sd32IX 03HOVlltl 6d(~~00 ~L0656LbZ80 sa6ewl 6dh L00 £5 L45 LbZ£0 sa6ewi :SBJVWI OBHOV1Ltl Wilson fl Elementary Schooi Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 2.3 C~b~ec~i~es end the Planning Process 2.3.1 Project Objective The objective of the proposed project is to construct a new elementary school within the current Wilson Elementary Schoo! attendance area. This new school is needed to relieve overcrowding of the existing Wilson School. The existing school is currently operating as a year-round school. The direction of the Board of Education is to construct sufficient schools to allow operation within a single track. Projections for the Wilson Elementary School attendance area indicate that enrollment will increase by &0 students in the next two years, further overcrowding the existing school. In the selection of a new Schaal site, a number of criteria are considered important: m Be located near the western portion of the current attendance area so that current and future students from the western portion of the attendance area can attend the new school. This will promote the concept of a neighborhood school Be located to avoid transporting all but special needs children to the Schaal Be located to avoid elementary students crossing major roadways Have sufficient acreage to allow physical education activities ® Comply with CDE School Siting Criteria ® if passible, select a site with some vacant land to reduce the taking of as few residential units as passible 2.3.2 Enrollment Projections and Need far Additional Schools The SBCUSD has an obligation to provide quality education to the existing and future students within the District. The District has an enrollment of 56,456 students as of October 2005. Projections indicate an enrollment decrease to 55,743 by 2010 and to 5.5,097 by 2015. This decrease is primarily due to migration out of the area. The Wilson Elementary attendance area is projected to increase from 1,071 students in 2006 to 1150 students in 2012. Table 2.31 illustrates this projected increase by year and grade level. These projections coupled with the Board of Education`s direction to convert schools with year round schedules such as Wilson to single track (all students attending at once} schedules will require the construction of an additional school in the attendance area. 2-3 Wilson 1! Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 Table 2.3-1 Projected Enrollment 1lllilson Elementary School Attendance Area ~ Grades ~ ~ ~ -~ . _ . ~_w.,., , ~.~, ~ ~ _,. ~,..~ - r ~~,~•r. ~c~ior~~ ~.B k~~ ~ K 1 2 3 4 5 B Total ar~, ~~~a~~p._~_ 2006-07 167 163 145 144 129 171 152 1071 200708 168 176 152 145 140 132 161 1074 2008-09 171 177 163 152 141 142 124 1070 2009-10 167 180 164 163 '147 144 134 1099 2010-11 167 176 168 164 158 150 '135 1118 2011-12 167 176 167 1'68 159 162 141 1140 2012-13 167 176 163 167 163 162 152 1150 2.4 Descripi®n of Proposed Facility 2.4.1 School Design The proposed project involves the construction of an approximately 42,380 square foot single story school an an approximately 8.7 acre parcel. The proposed project consists of 33 teaching stations with 30 stations for grades 1-5 (or grades 1-6) and three stations for kindergarten. The design includes administration areas, kitchen mechanical rooms, restrooms, a library, a multipurpose roam, a lunch shelter and a teacher workroom. The facility will include approximately 56 paved parking spaces and approximately 30,000 square feet of paved outdoor physics! education facilities including playground equipment basketball, volleyball courts and tetherball courts. Additionally, approximately 73,000 square feet of turF will be provided for athletic activities. Figure 2.4-1 includes a plat plan for the proposed project. Project elevations are shown in Figure 2.4-2. Implementation of the proposed project will require the abandonment of Berkeley Avenue and 25th Street on the project site by the City of San Bernardino. The proposed project will also require the abandonment or redesign of the water, sewer, storm water, power, natural gas, telephone and cable TV infrastructure in the area_ The facility will be landscaped with turf snd plants with low irrigation requirements. irrigation will be conducted using potable water. 2.4.2 Construction Construction of the proposed project will be conducted in several phases. The first phase will involve the demolition of 40 single--family residential units plus out buildings and other associated structures. Above- and below-ground utilities will either be abandoned and removed or rerouted. Streets, driveways, sidewalks, curbs and gutters would also be removed. It is anticipated that this phase of the project will require approximately 180 calendar days to complete. 2-4 Aawye;p 'wdg£:g'LOOZ ~eW bZ ~43llOld 6MP'L-b-Z :3WVN 3lld LLbb9 'ON 1O3fO?Jd woo'~apla;ulalN~,wunA VIN2IOdIlVO'ONIO21VN2i38 NVS LO!£Z1£0 bZ£L-96£ ~606)'Xbd 5££0-96£ X6061 'Hd lORl1SI0'IOOHOS Q31dINn AllO ONIO2iVN2138 NVS ~A8 O8RO21ddb ~31V~ ®y® 59L L6 VO `~e8 Puowelp ~OOHOS AMV1N3W313 II NOS"INA 21310W2Jd1SBM'f ~A9 O371O3H0 YV 05~aaing 'anpQ e)sy~l+alie/~OL£6 A3N23Hbd 'd ~A90dS1~d21 3 ~ ~ ' ~ Ned 3J-,S A3N2IHbd '4 A9 NMb'NQ ~an~id 5016Z/£0 4d1V0 `Sl~HlIHO21V OlM A8 a341AObd dVW 3Sb9 ~BDN32iBd3il I I ~ ~ g ' - ~ ~ sg ~~e~4~~~~~A m m! o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ " ~ ~ a a a a - d n 0 ~ s" g~ Z ~ N ~ t S ~e~~~~~~ k6 ~'^ ~ „ y n~ ~ " w gg ~9 S 9 yy p g~ g ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~, x x~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ .~~' g ~ ~ ~ s s ~ u $N= ~ ~ 6 a~ ~ a a a~ ~~$ ~ ~5~~1 ~c€ 9 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I a g~ ~e£°~G~~f ~ n ies ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ash $ a~~~g~ o ~ ~ e' '~ -. ~ ~6 ~~" ~I ~~a~l~~~®~~sA~~a$r,is~a~~e~i~~g~3~~~~~~~ ~eg;8g ( ~~§~~§'s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W 6 € psi z ////~~~~~~ QQ Sgg W ~a~~ g~ $~(4" C.7 N @ $ a ~ ~ € aQ a~~ ~ a' ____a_ LL ~ ® i ~ ~ ~ ~ i J332'!1S -- - ti\~ ~ \ \\r°_____~ ~ 7 ~ . _ ~ ~ S H19Z . ~~~" ~ ~ ~ . I t -}- ~ ~ ~ ~ to ~ I _ `i ~ ~ ~ ~ pew a ~ , f ~ ~ 13~211S H19Z ``A ' '' O f~no.(e~ :1nOAVl \LLbb9\QOVO~LOOZI"1 :3lid OVO fO2Id50~,00Z\:~-ald Sd321X 4BHOblltl 6di~ ~-b-Z sa6ewl :S3JVWI 43HOtllltl 6awye}p `wdgb:9 `LOOZ ~eW bZ ~O3llOld 6mp~Z-b-Z 3WHN 3lld LLbb9 'ON 1O8PO2id won~~apla;ulalN~~ VIN71OdI1V0'ONIO2iVN2i38 NyS LO!£Z/£0 bZE 6-96E (606)'XVd ,££0-96£ (606)'Hd 1O1b1SlO lOOHOS 031dINn AllO ONI@iVNii38 NbS :A8 O3AO2lddV :31Va Z®i® 59LL6V0'~eepuoweld IOOHOSA23V1N3W3lHIINOSIIM LI31HW2131SBM'f A8O3)iO3H0 V Og ~ ayng ~anud elslp 6alieA OLE l ~g A3N?JHNd'Q :A843SIA323 ® 7 ' ~ SN®SJ.d/~3,3 J.~~r®ad A3N21HNd'~ :A8 NMVNQ 32In`Jld 50t6Z!£0 a31H4 'S1O311HO2iN OlM As 4301~O2Jd dNW 3SV8 3ON3213d3?J cv co a; - ~-; ~ ~t ~W ~ g ~wffi ~ _ ~s~~ I s~ o b j r ~ -_ ~ W = ~~--- - ~7I - i fig` - a# ~ ~ ~# .-- o- - ®- --- ~S ~ i ~ a o- --- 5 o- ~ - o--- - - ~ r o o--- ', - ~ ~ ~ W J ~ = W w ~ W - - o-- _ ~ ~ e; s C?- ~ 1 i W ~ ~ ~x. o = a Z ~ ; ~ 4 ~ L/ - '~ of _ Lu ~b~~:J ---- ~ Q ~ W3~ ~ W } - _ ~j~j.. F. ~ +1 ~, ~ i ' - ~ ~ ~ ~-- I o--- ~ ~ ~ -- ~~-- O- o o- , - ~`a ~, >',. ~ ~ _ $ ---- as ~ o- #~- - - o-_- - v _ ~, ~ a' ~4 ~<E d_ N d T O~ Uno,fel :1nOAt(1 \LLbbs\QONOVLOOZ\:l :3lld OVA !'O2id90VSODZ\:l-ald :Sd32iX 03H~VllN 6dl`Z-b-Z sa6ewl :S3JNWI Q3HOVllV Wifson Elementary Schaal Draft Environments! Impact Report December, 20(37' Once demolition is complete, the site will be graded. Since the site is relatively level, grading will not be extensive and will be balanced on site. It is estimated that there will be 35,000 cubic yards of clean imported fill. The grading process is estimated to take up to 60 days. Truck traffic of the imported fill would average approximately 30 trucks per day. Truck routes will be designated once the site for the fill materials is determined. Truck traffic will be restricted to non--peak daytime hours_ Construction of the buildings, paving of parking lots and playground areas and landscaping will be the last stage of construction. This phase will also include the connection of the school to the existing utility infrastructure serving the area. This phase is expected to last up to 'I0 months. 2.4.3 Operation The proposed new elementary school will accommodate approximately 772 students on a single-track basis and up to 900 students on a year~round basis_ It is anticipated that the school would have 29 classified personnel and 30 certificated personnel. Normal school hours will be from 7:30 AM to 3:30 PM. It is likely that there would be before school and after school programs and occasions! nighttime meetings. It is anticipated that only two buses for the transportation of special needs students would be associated with the school operation. 2.4.4 Relocation of Current Residences Implementation of the proposed project will include the preparation of a relocation program for residents occupying homes at the proposed project site. The relocation plan will include; ® Payment to the landowner for their property at fair market value. Relocation payments far residents living on the proposed project site. ® Assistance in providing comparable housing within the areas. A detailed relocation plan will be available prior to the Board of Education taking action of the proposed project. 2.5 Required Discretionary Actions, Permits and Approvals Implementation of the proposed project will include the fallowing approvals: San Bernardino City Unified School District: Approval of acquisition of the proposed project site and approval of the construction of the school. City of San Bernardino: Approval for abandonment of 25~~' Street and Berkeley Avenue within the project area and approval for abandonment and/ar relocation of City owned utilities. q San Bernardino Municipal Water District: Connecting the project to water and wastewater systems and providing service. ® State of California, Ofl"ace of Public School Construction, Department of IEducation: Providing funding for site acquisition and school construction. State of Galifornia, Division of State Architect: Approval of school design. 2~7 Wilson lI Elementary Schaal Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 THIS? PAGE I~ INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAN~C z-s Wilson ff lemenfary 5chooi Drat Environmenfai lmpaef Reporf December 2007 3 EXISTING CGN®ITI®NS This section describes the existing environmental conditions for the proposed project. It addresses all issues in the lnitia! Study Checklist except for agricultural resources. The area is residential and not farmland and is not considered prime farmland or farmland of statewide importance. 3,'I Aesthetics 3.1.1 Existing Conditions The proposed project site is located within an urban area consisting of single family residential units with landscaping. Commercial areas are located to the south of the site. The area is relatively flat with little topographic or man-made features. Lighting in the area is generally limited to street lighting and other lighting associated with residential areas. Figures 3.1-1 and 3.1-2 provide site photos characteristic of the area. 3.1.2 Regulatory Setting Visual issues are normally under the oversight of the City of San Bernardino in terms of building codes and height regulations. In this instance, the SBCUSD in conjunction with the Office of State Architect will control the design. 3.2 Air Quality The project site is located in southwestern San Bernardino County within the northeastern portion of the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which encompasses Orange County, and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Riverside counties. -This section describes the existing overall condition of air resources in this basin, with a focus on the project area. The meteorology and climate conditions are discussed followed by a description of the air duality setting and existing air quality conditions. 3.2.1 Meteorology and Climate Regional Climate The climate of the SCAB is determined by its terrain and geographical location. The SCAB is a coastal plain with broad connecting valleys and low hills bounded to the west by the Pacific Ocean and by mountains on the other sides. The region lies in the semi- permanent high pressure zone of the eastern Pacific Ocean. l=or this reason, the climate is generally mild due to the influence of cool sea breezes. infrequently this mild climate pattern is interrupted by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, ar Santa Ana winds. ~-1 ~, ~ ws ~,,z , . I .t $ ~,~ ,: _ ~ ~ R ~ 5 '~ 4v Y / f' ~), J k A2, ri~r " ,y _ ` y a s" 7 . 3 h o r f a',.. Ilk y~ °".S"v ~,,,rz.~~.r,,. er,. VIEW _QF__Ti~lE_ SUB.! T SITE ,.~ ,. ,~ ,, , t, =" -r s' ~ iy %~ ~ F a~ ilk, y'- n 3 _ Y ' ~ Y . ~ f -'. d wI i' , i. ~ ti w }.,: y t ~~, ~ ~ ~ _ O ~ Z ~1' U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q i/i ~ N m ~ W LL "'~ O ~ V O LL z V1EW__UF THE SUBJECT SITE U U a~ m ~ BRAWN BY: D. FAHRNEY w~ SITE PH®T®CRAPHS DEVISED BY: D. FAHRNEY ~ u~'"i d 1370 Valley Visia Drive, Suite 150 ¢ ~ o CHECKED BY: JW ~ x ~ Diamond bar, CA 91765 ~ ° ~ PH. (909) 396-0335 FAX. (909) 396-1324 WILSON II ELEMENTARY 5CHOOL FIGURE U ~ ~°~, www.kleinfelder.com SAN BERNARI]INO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ¢ ¢ ~ SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ o DRAWN: 09!06107 APPROVED BX:.,~..,.~...., PROJECT NO. 69477 FILE NAME:3-1-1.dwg ~' ,~(, ,' ~'` r s, ~ x - t y. l ~ .a ". R.: ~ 4 y~"' iu ~, ~,, V W y~ ~ i ' u Y, A S` 1 y~ LLY.Y! L k ~ TT T s `a ~ ~p w ~"' "y O ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ Q ? Q ~ U ~ ~ ~ °o ~ J "_7 LLI ~ J O LL. ~ ¢ V1EW 0~ THE SUB,#ECT ,ATE ~ U G1 iii m ~ DRAWN BY: D. FAHRNEY SITE PWA'T'®C7RAPHS REVISED BY: D. FAHRNEY ~ w ~ 1370 Valley Vista prive, Suife 150 ¢ ~ C] CHECKED BY: JW ~ x ~ biamoRd bar, CA 977fi5 ~ ° ~ PH. {909) 396-0335 FAX. (909) 398-1324 WILSON II fmf.EMENTARY SCHOOL FIGURE ~U ~ www.kleinfelder.eom SAN BERNARDINO CITY UN[F1i=D SCHppL pISTRIC"f SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ~ ¦ ~ ~ ¢ ~ DRAWN: 09/06/07 APPROVED B~_ PROJECT' NO. 54477 FILE NAIVIE:3-1-2.dv~g Wilsnn 1! Elementary School Draft :Envrronmenta! Impact Report December 2007' Temperature The average annual temperature varies little throughout the SCAB with an overall average of fit°F. The eastern portion of the basin shows greater variability in annual minimum and maximum temperatures because there is a less pronounced oceanic influence. All portions ofi the basin have recorded temperatures in excess ofi 100°F during recent years. .January is typically the coldest month while July and August are usually the hottest. The climatological station closest to the project site is the San Bernardino station, which has an average maximum temperature of 80.1 °F and an average minimum of 49.3°F (Western Regional Climate Center 2007). Rainfall Almost all ofi the rainfall within the SCAB falls during the November-April period. Summer rainfall is limited to widely scattered thunderstorms that tend to be heavier in the eastern partinn of the basin. At the San Bernardino station, the average annual rainfiall is 16.07 inches, with February typically being the wettest month (Western Regional Climate Center 2007). Humidity The SCAB has asemi-arid climate that typically contains a marine layer that is present on moist days. The ocean effect is dominant except far days when off-share winds bring dry air into the basin. Occurrences of heavy fog are frequent and low stratus clouds are considered a characteristic climate feature. Annual relative humidity ranges from 70 percent at the coast to 57 percent in the eastern part of the basin. Vllind Because the basin's average winds are typically very light, there is very limited capability within the basin to disperse air contaminants horizontally_ In downtown L.os Angeles, wind speeds average 5.7 miles per hour with little seasonal variation. Summer wind speeds average slightly higher than winter wind speeds_ Inland wind speeds tend to be slightly higher than Los Angeles while coastal winds tend to be slightly higher in Las Angeles. The dominant wind pattern is a daytime sea breeze and nighttime land breeze, which is broken only by winter storms ar Santa Ana flows from the areas north of the basin. On mast spring and early summer days, pollution produced during a day is transported out of the basin either through mountain passes or lifted by convective currents produced from heating of the mountain slopes. From late summer through the winter, there is not as much transport of pollutants out of the basin because of lighter wind speeds and the appearance of off-shore winds. This allows pollutants #o accumulate during the night and the following morning resulting in stagnant conditions. Cloudiness Morning fag and Iaw stratus clouds are common in the basin due to persistent low inversions and cool coastal ocean water. On the average, there are 185 clear days, 106 partly cloudy days, and 74 cloudy days each year. The eastern portions of the basin tend to be slightly less cloudy while the coastal areas are 25 percent more cloudy. 3-4 W!lsan !I Elementary Schaa! Draft Enviranmenta! Impact Report December 2007 1nVersiordS Vertical dispersion of pollutants in the SCAB is hampered by the presence of a persistent temperature inversion in the surface layers of the atmosphere. Basin-wide, the average occurrence of inversions at the ground surface is 11 days per month, ranging from an average of 2 days in June to 22 days, in December. Low inversions combined with low wind speeds produce the greatest concentration of pollutants, in the winter, the greatest pollution problems are carbon monoxide (CO} and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) because of very low inversions and air stagnation during the night and morning hours and the lack of intense sunlight that is needed for photochemical reactions. In the summer, the longer daytime hours and the more intense sunlight cause the formation of photochemical smog from hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen. 3.2.2 Air Quality Regulatory Setting Air Quality Regulations Air quality management exists at the federal, state, and local government levels. Air quality planning programs have generally been developed in response to requirements established by the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA} and subsequent amendments to the act; however, the enactment of the California Clean Air Act (CCAA} of 1988 produced additional changes in the structure and administration of air quality management programs in California. Federal Air (duality 1Vlanagement. The FCAA, originally passed in 1963 by the U.S. Congress, has been amended several times, most recently in 7990. Under this statute, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for air pollutants that pose a threat to human health or welfare (refer to Table 8.2-1 If a standard is exceeded in an area (measured over athree-year period), the area is designated as being in nonattainment for that standard. A state implementation plan (SIP) must be prepared that demonstrates how the area will lac brought back into attainment. If a SIP is not prepared or is disapproved by the EPA, a federal implementation plan must be prepared. State Air C~uafity Nlar~agement. Under the CCAA, attainment is required at the earliest practicable date, and reasonable progress must be made each year. The California ambient air quality standards (CAAQS} were adopted under this act (Table 3.2-~1). The CCAA requires that state attainment plans be prepared for designated nonattainment areas with requirements depending an the nonattainment category. The first air quality management plan (AQMP) for the SCAB was prepared in 1979. From that time, the AQMP was revised twice, resulting in adoption of what was named the Final 1989 Air Quality Management Plan. The 1989 plan was the first AQMP to define a comprehensive control strategy, achievable attainment dates, and an aggressive ru[emaking schedule for implementation. Adoption of the 1990 amendments to the federal Clean Air Act and the 1985 California Clean Air Act resulted in adoption of a revised AQMP in 1991 that took into account the stricter requirements of the new laws. This plan proposed stricter control over industrial plant emissions; extended South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) air pollution regukations to include air toxics and global warming and ozone-depleting 3-5 Wilson 1! Eiemenfary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2007 gases, and established an attainment schedule to approach the state--required five percent per year emissions reduction. The AQMP was revised again in 1994 and 1997. The 1997 plan was a continuation of the 1994 plan and contained a greater focus on particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter (PM~~} because of a federal requirement to demonstrate attainment of the federal PM~© ambient air quality standards. The 1997 AQMP also demonstrated attainment far ozone and carbon monoxide, and included a maintenance plan for nitrogen dioxide because the SCAB qualified for attainment of the federal standard. The 1997 AQMP incorporated new scientific data consisting primarily of updated emissions inventories, ambient measurements, and new models_ The 1997 AQMP was amended in 1999 to revise the ozone portion of the plan in response to EPA's concerns with the ozone control strategy in the 1997 AQMP. On August 1, 2003, the SCAQMD Governing Board approved the 2003 AQMP. This plan updated the attainment demonstration for federal ozone standards for ozone and PM~o, updated the maintenance plan for NO2, replaced the attainment demonstration far CO, and provides the basis for a CO maintenance plan. This plan has not been approved by the EPA, but the SCAQMD is proceeding with plan implementation. {South Coast Air Quality Management District 2007a} The 2003 AQMP is currently under revision. The Draft 2007 AQMP focuses primarily on ozone and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM~.S}. This plan incorporates significant new ,data, emissions inventories, ambient measurements, control strategies, and air quality modeling. The draft plan was released for review and comment in Tate 2006 and is currently being finalized. {South Coast Air Quality Management District 2007b) Climate change and production of Greenhouse Gases are of a concern and are addressed in Assembly Bill 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act. AB 32 codifies the state's goal by requiring that global emissions be reduced to '1990 levels by 2020. In order to effectively implement the cap, AB 32 directs the California Air Resources Board to develop appropriate regulations and establish a mandatary reporting system to track and monitor global warming emission levels. local Air Quality liwllanagerxaent. The California Clean Air Act designates the SCAQMD as the agency responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the SCAB. The SCAQMD is responsible for reducing emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements, inspects emission sources, and enforces these measures through educational programs or through fines, if necessary. For construction activities, Rule 403 of the SCAQMD's rules and regulations would apply. The sfiafied purpose of this rote is to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (manmade) dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce, ar mitigate fugitive dust emissions. In general, this rule prohibits emissions of fugitive dust that are visible beyond the property line of the source and requires utilization of one or more of the best available control measures to minimize dust emissions. Specific PM1~ concentration thresholds are provided. Also, requirements for removing materials from paved public roadways are stated under this rule. (South Coasfi Air Quality Management District 2007c} 3-6 Wilson I! Efementary Schoo! Draft Environmental Jmpact Report December 2Q07 Rule "1403 applies specifically to asbestos emissions related to building demolition or renovation. The purpose of this rule is to specify work practice requirements to limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation activities, including the removal and associated disturbance of asbestos--containing materials. The requirements for demolition and renovation activities include asbestos surveying; notification; removal procedures and time schedules; handlirig and clean-up procedures; and storage, disposal, and landfillmg requirements for asbestos-containing waste materials (South Coast Air Quality Management District 2007d). Table 3.~-1 Ambient.4ir Quality Standards F ~ ~ ~L~ ~ ~ _,,, ~ ~ t ~ ~ a ~ l,"~deir~l tanrl~trds ' F'otluta~`~tt ~`::..,. ~ar~entrat~,o~~ ';~ . ~:~C~l~f~~r~~a~fanda~ds ~ 'r~ma;... ` '. Ozone v1~ hour 0.09 ppm (180 ~aglm } 0.12 ppm (235 ~zglm ) $-hour 0.070 ppm (137 0.08 ppm (167 uglm ) t~glm~) Respirable Particulate 24 hour 50 ~glm 150 ~g/m Matter (PM,o} Annual Arithmetic 20 ~glm NA Mean Fine Particulate 24 hour NA 36 ~a.glm Matter (PM~,S} Annual Arithmetic 12 ~glm 15 iaglm Mean Carbon Monoxide 8 hour 9.0 ppm (10 ~glm } 9 ppm (10 ~g/m } 1 hour 20 ppm (23 ~glm } 35 ppm (40 ~glm } 8 hour (Lake Tahoe) 6 ppm (7 ~g/m } NA Nitrogen Dioxide Annual Arithmetic NA 0.053 ppm (100 Mean ~xglm3) 1 hour 0.25 ppm (470 tzg/m) NA Sulfur Dioxide Annual Arithmetic NA 0.030 ppm (80 Mean tzglm~) 24 hour 0.04 ppm (105 ~glm } 0'.14 ppm (365 ~glm ) 1 hour 0.25 ppm (655 NA uglm~) Lead 30-day average 1.5 ~glm NA Calendar Quarter NA 1.5 ~glm Visibility reducing 8 hour l=xtinction coefficient NA Particles of 023 per kilometer- visibility of 10 miles ar more (0.07-30 miles or more for Lake Tahoe} due to particles when relative humidity is less than 7'0 percent. Sulfates 24 hour 25 ~glm NA Hydrogen Sulfide 1 Dour 0.03 ppm (42 ~glm } NA Vinyl Chloride 24 hour 0.{31 ppm (26 µglm) NA Notes: ppm-parts per million ~glm~-micrograms per cubic meter NA-not applicable Source: California Air Resources Board 2006 3-7 Wilson f! Elementary Schaal Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2007 x.2.3 Existing. Air Quality Existing Air Quality Conditions The SCAQMD operates a network of air quality monitoring stations located throughout the basin. These stations are used to regularly record concentrations of air pollutants for which federal and state agencies have established ambient air quality standards. Table 3.2-2 provides a summary of data for the San Bernardino--4t'~ Street monitoring station, which is the closest station to the project site. The primary pollutants of concern in the project vicinity are discussed below. Ozone, Ozone is not emitted directly into the air but is formed by the photochemical reaction in the atmosphere. Ozone precursors, which include reactive organic gases (ROG} and NOx, react in the atmosphere in the presence of sunlight to form ozone. Because photochemical reaction rates depend on the intensity of ultraviolet light and air temperature, ozone is primarily a summer air pollution problem. Ozone is a respiratory irritant and an oxidant #hat increases susceptibility to respiratory infections and causes substantial damage to vegetation and other materials. As indicated in Table 3.2-2, one-hour and eight-hour atone concentrations regularly exceed state standards in the project area. The SCAB is designated as an extreme nonattainment area for federal one-hour and eight-hour ozone standards. Carbon Monoxide. State and federal standards have been set for both 1-hour and 8W hour averaging times. Carbon monoxide is a public health concern because it combines readily with hemoglobin and thus reduces the amount of oxygen transported in the bloodstream. Motor vehicles are the dominant source of CO in most areas. Nigh CO levels develop primarily during winter when periods of light winds combine with the formation of ground level temperature inversions (typically from the evening through early morning). These conditions result in reduced dispersion of vehicle emissions. Mater vehicles also exhibit increased CO emission rates at low air temperatures. Carbon monoxide levels in the project vicinity are well below federal standards. The SCAB is designated as a serious nonattainment area for federal CO standards. PM~fl. Health concerns associated with suspended particulate matter focus on those particles small enough to reach the lungs when inhaled. PM~~ conditions in the SCAB result from a combination of sources, including vehicle traffic, industrial sources, agricultural activities, and secondary reactions in the atmosphere. In the project vicinity, PM~~ levels are typically below federal standards but above state standards. The SCAB is classified as serious nonattainment far federal PM~o standards. PM2.~, Like PM~~, PM~,~ also results from a combination of sources that include vehicle traffic, industrial sources, agricultural ac#ivities, and secondary reactions in the atmosphere. In the project vicinity, PMz.~ levels are occasionally exceeded. The SCAB is classified as nonattainment for federal PM~.~ standards. 3-8 w.f e „~3 CD N r O d' ~ Cam] ~ ch ~~o r rn '~.' m ~ o ~ ca ~ E ©o ~ c~ o ~-- ~ ~ ='~ ci ci ~ o ~ vrv~~rv O ~~~, C`~-.} -Q ~ ~ r 1~ c~r cA OS ~~y N' O Ca ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~~,w ~ ~ ~V C3 t+~ ~ ~ C37 -,p C~: ~ ~ 't""' ~ lt] o 'c}' Q p i C-j C] ~ C~ C'7 r ~ ~, . ; ,...~,; C? Aj o w .o ,m~rv ~ --Mm: M~,~ t. ~ ~ o q ~ M' rn o r ~ ~ = ems: c5 o ci o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :6~~: trs ~~' ~.., ~f ~-; ~ rt co 0 C L7 ~ CO d' CA O N d r ~ ~ ~ ~ r r r~ ,~ C7 O Cry r p o O o pp tf) ~ =''Cal` Q O ~ C] C7 r ti w ,~, ,ter ti P ..~;P'°~p; C ~ d mow, ~ t_S ~ c .:~tl~ '~ ~ © o a N o ~, ~ ~ '~=~0" c' ~ ffy ~ ~ ~ ~"" A s~ ~ - ~'~ = ~ ~ ~ N ~ m a ~ ~wrr~^,~ ~ m :M ~s C ~ ~ ~' ~ v v chi cAi U ~ ~~''' ~~`a~-~~~~' ~ w axi ~ axi axi 4XS ~ ° o "` ~,~ ~ w ~ ~;- m ~ ca r5s tts ~ =w~ ~ ~ cn css to c~ ~' ~ ~ v ti~w;~ a.. ~ a ~ iz ~ a_ ~ cx. ~ ~ i ~i ° ai ~ ~' ~ ~ ;w 4t1 ~ C~ C7l w.. t~ ~ N ~ f0 -p (0 3 0 .CS ,.~ ~ BSI A ~ CD ~ C]S LS N O CSy ~ CU ~ C ~ L'1 ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C@ t3 ~ CTS ~ N ~ N ¢ ~ c a~ Il. ~ ~ Ua ` ~ U) ~ U3 ~ Vl ~ CIS j, Q! ~ ~ O ~ O LO ~ ~ N =,~~~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ a ~ O ~ CO 'II O ~ Ca N O ° ° ~ y~`=tea'' ~ r ~ . oCl s... ~ t._ ~ ~ c.. ~ L ,~, i N ~ m ,~ ,c} ~:~';,~~~ C1} N aS 01 US tll N QS US ClJ ~ N r, fA (13 N ~ to fn N c2 ~ „sx_;.ee O O~ O O E Cll ~ N~ C 0 0~ 4 (U ~ QS N [V ~ ~ I~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ li ~E~2x,, Wilson l1.Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2fJ07 Existing Sources of Air Pollution The SCAQMD maintains an emissions inventory for the SCAB that is periodically updated. Table 3.2-3 shawl sources of air pollutant emissions within the basin for the 2002 base year. Table 3.2-3 Summary of Emissions by IVNajor Source Category: 2QQ2 Base Year; Average Annual Day (tons per day) riurc~~~fe a. ~...,~ ,...~" ~~9 ~ ~..,ar._~ ~ :.m~7t~~.., ;, ~ i~t'~x ._,...~~~3~_.~:.~ S~D~_ ~VT'1Vt~.s_.._.. Stationary Sources Fuel Combustion 7 35 52 2 6 Waste Disposal 8 2 1 0 0 Cleaning and SurFsce Castings 54 0 0 0 1 Petroleum Praductian and 35 D 9 7 1 Marketing industrial Pracesse5 22 D 2 D 5 Solvent f~vaporatian Cansurr~er Products 110 0 D D D Architectural Castings 49 D 0 0 0 Others 3 D D D D Miscellaneous Processes 16 27 62 D 47 RECI..AIM Sources 0 29 D 12 D "rota! Stations Sources 304 83 126 22 60 Mobile Sources On-Road Vehicles 455 642 41500 4 18 Off-Road Vehicles 216 36S 1114 28 23 Total Mobile Sources 671 1091 5264 32 41 TOTAL 875 1104 5380 54 109 Notes: VOC: volatile organic compounds RECLAIM: F2egional Clean Air Incentives hllarket Sox: sulfur oxides Source: South Coast Air Quality Nia~agement r7istrict 2DD7b Sensitive Receptors The project site is surrounded by land uses that would be particularly sensitive to air pollution emissions occurring during construction and operation of the facility. Arrawview Middle Schaal is located adjacent to the project site on the south side. Single family residential housing exists on the other three sides. 3.3 Biological Resources 3.3.'I Vegetation The proposed project site is typical of urban residential areas in southern California. Little native vegetation occurs in the area with most of the vegetation consisting of cultivated ornaments! plants associated with landscaping. Vacant areas within the 3-10 Wilson fl Elementary School Draft Environmental fmpact Report December 2007 project area generally contain nanµnative plant species of a more ruderal nature including grasses, escaped ornamentals and weedy species_ Because of the age of the community, the area contains a number of mature trees, primarily non--native species. Many of these trees are associated with parkways and similar uses. The trees, although mature, are not of the size or species to be considered heritage trees. 3.3.2 Wildlife Wildlife species within the project area are common species adapted to urban residential areas. These species include a wide number of bird species such as English sparrows, crows, wrens and similar species. Habitat far the species includes ornamental trees, landscape and turf. One vacant lot contains non-native grasses and other annual species. 3.3.3 Threatened and Endangered Species No federal or State of California listed threatened or endangered species would occur within the project area. The site is also not located within any adopted or proposed Habitat Conservation Planning areas. There is a potential that vacant land in the project area could support burrowing awls. These birds frequently nest within urban areas, although Wane were observed during surveys. The larger trees could support nesting species that may be considered migratory species. 3.3.4 Regulatory Framework Wildlife Species are under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The agencies enforce the California and Federal Endangered Species Acts respectively. Additionally, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service enforces the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. 3,4 Cultural Resvurce~ A cultural resources report {URS 2Qp5} was prepared to assess the proposed project site for historic and prehistoric resources. The information contained in this report is summarized below. A survey of the historical resources of the site was prepared by Kleinfelder for this report and is contained in the technical appendix {Appendix C) of this EiR. 3.4.1 Literature Review The Area of Potential Effect {APE} far this project was identified as an area bounded by 26t~ Street on the north, G Street on the west, Arrowview Middle Schaal on the south and F Street on the east. Within this APE, there are 40 single family residences and a vacant lot. 3-11 Wilson ff Elementary School ©raft Environmental Impact Report December 2007 A cultural resources records search was conducted at the San Bernardino County Museum Archaeological Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System on July 2004. The record search included the project APE and a'/- mile radius around the project site. The record search indicated that the project APE has not been surveyed previously. Within a '/~-mile radius, two previous surveys have occurred, resulting in three previously recorded resources; one prehistoric (archaeological resource} and two historic. 3.4.2 Historic Resources The proposed project site is a portion of the Bonita Gardens Tract. The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 1923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages: The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. As such, this tract (aka the APE) is associated with the Regional Cul#ure (1917-1945) historic context. The first home was completed in 1922 {lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the made) home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction tank place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25~~' Street. Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10} in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, fal[awed by three lots in 1932 {lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25}, two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11 }, and three in 1939 (lofts 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with tats 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed an similar Ints, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. This trac# exemplified the 1920s building boom, and its northward expansion. The neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages remains as a cohesive neighborhood of the style and type. As such, the Bonita Gardens tract appears to meet the California Register criteria far local significance as a historic district, with a period of significance from 1922-1941. As such, each dwelling constructed during this period was assessed for its historical integrity, and the dwellings determined to have experienced significant loss, were removed from inclusion. In summary, a total of 29 Names were determined to be contributors to this potential local historic district. CEQA requires evaluation of project impacts on historic resources, including properties "listed in, ar determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources [or] included in a local register of historical resources." in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, "a project, which causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment." Substantial adverse change in the significance of art historic resource is defined as the destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or of the immediate surroundings, such that the significance of an historic 3-'E2 Wllson 11 Elementary Schoaf Draft Enviranrrrenta! Impact Report December 2DD7 resource would be materially impaired. Thus, consideration must be made of potential historic properties in project planning. Avoidance of these resources "rs the preferred alternative. However, In the event that avoidance of a site cannot occur as a result of an action, the project development plans must be evaluated to determine whether the action would cause a "substantial adverse change" in the significance of the resource. If impacts to previously fisted or potentially listed resources are unavoidable, proper mitigation is rewired. 3.4.3 Archaeological Resources A records check of the APE did not identify any known archaeological resources on the proposed project site, although one site was recorded within '/~ mile of the site. The area has undergone substantial surface disruption associated with construction of homes and other activities. There is a potential that the area could contain subsurface resources that cannot be identified at this time. 3.4.4 Paleantalogical Resources The proposed project site is located within alluvium of Pleistocene age. Although the area is not known for containing paleontological resources, there is a potential that buried resources could be contained in the area. 3.4.5 Regulatory Framework Cultural resources are regulated by the California State Historic Preservation Office and locally by the City of San Bernardino. 3.5 Ge€~I®gy and Soils 3.5.1 Regional Setting The proposed 8.7-acre project site is located on the southwest corner of 26~h Street and F Street in the city of San Bernardino, California. The site is situated within the northern portion of the Perris Block, a large structural block of land that is part of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of Southern California. The Peninsular Ranges, which extend southward from the San Gabriel Mountains to several hundred miles into Baja California, are characterized by northwest-trending mountain ranges, and broad valleys bordered by strike slip faults that run in a northwest direction. The northern Perris Block is bordered by three major convergent fault systems- the northwest-trending San Andreas system, the east-trending faults of the Traverse Ranges, and the nar#heast- trending faults of the Whittier-Elsinore system. Quaternary alluvial deposits underlie the project site. 3-'f3 Wilson !i Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December 20Q7 3.5.2 Local Setting The discussion in this section is based on work conducted by URS 2004 and a geotechnical investigation of the site conducted by Converse Consultants (2000). Faults and Seismic Hazards The proposed project site is not currently located in a State of California Earthquake Fault ~- Rupture Hazard Zone (previously known as Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zane}, nor is any fault known to project through or toward the site based nn current geological information. The San .facinto fault is the closest active fault located 3.8 miles southwest of the site. The proposed site is located in a seismically active region, and local and distant faults will generate moderate to strong ground shaking over the lifetime of the project. The proposed project site is listed as a Seismic Zone 4 by the California Building Code {2001 a designation that denotes that the area has experienced quakes with a Richter magnitude greater than seven and high levels of recent seismicity. Major structural damage associated with quakes of intensity VIII (Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale} or greater can be expected in Seismic Zone 4. The seismic hazard for the proposed site is analogous to San Fernando Valley, as demonstrated in the 1971 San 1=ernandn and 1994 Northridge earthquakes. Between the years 1800 and 2005 there were 134 earthquakes within 100 km of the site with a moment magnitude of 5.0 or higher, with the largest quake in .luly 2005, with a M7.6 magnitude and a reported epicenter 2.7 miles away from the site. Surface Fault Rupture The proposed project site is not currently located in a State of California Earthquake f=ault -Rupture Hazard Zone (previously known as Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone), nor are any faults known to project through or towards the site based on current geological information. The potential for surface rupture as a result of movement of major nearby faults is not known with certainty but is estimated to be very low. Liquefaction Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon where saturated, granular soils experience a substantial loss of strength and deformation due to increased pore pressure ~s a result of increased cyclic shear stress caused by earthquakes. In this process, unconfined soil masses can become horizontally and vertically mobile. Soils most susceptible to liquefaction are saturated, (nose, relatively free of clay, relatively young and fine-grained sand deposits. Liquefaction requires the coexistence of susceptible soils, strong ground motions and shallow ground water. The ground water found on the site is 51.5 feet from the existing ground level and is not shallow enough to be considered susceptible to liquefaction. Lateral Spreading Seismically induced lateral spreading involves the sideways movement of earth materials, especially soils subject to liquefaction, due to seismic activity. Near vertical cracks and horizontal soil movement are evidence of lateral spreading. Lateral spreading differs from slope failure, a complete ground failure involving large earth soil 3-14 Wilson Elemenfary School Draft Environmental impact Report Oecem6er 20Q7 movement, because the degree of slope is less. Since the topography of the proposed site and adjacent areas is relatively flat, the potential for lateral spreading is considered very low. Landslides Landslides and other slope failures are common occurrences during or sawn after earthquakes. Since the topography of the proposed site and adjacent areas are relatively flat, the possibility of landslide is considered to be nil. 3.5.3 Other Oeofogic Hazards Earthqual~e Induced Flooding This type of flooding occurs when seismic events cause dams or other water retaining structures to rupture. The potential of earthquake-induced flooding of the proposed project site is very law. Tsunamis and Seiches Tsunamis are oceanic waves that are created by earthquakes, submarine volcanic eruptions or large submarine landslides. Tsunamis have very tang wavelengths (distance from crest to crest, or trough to trough) but are only a few feet high whin they are created in the open ocean, but as they near the shallow waters of the shore their velocity decreases and wave height increases. The waves that come ashore can be over 5Cl feet tall and highly destructive. Seiches are large waves that are created in enclosed bodies of water as a result of ground shaking. Based on the locafton of the site, tsunamis and Seiches do not pose a hazard. Expansive Soils Expansive soils are characterized by their ability to undergo significant volume change (shrink ar swell) due to variations ire moisture content. Changes in soil moisture content can result from rainfall, landscape irrigation, utility leakage, roof drainage, perched groundwater, draught, ar other factors that may cause unacceptable settlement or heave of structures, concrete slabs supported-on-grade, or pavements supported on these materials. The on-site soils are fine-grained and have "Very Low" expansion potential based on expansion index texts, although soils will become mixed during grading and the actual expansion potential should be verified at the completion of grading. 3.5.4 Subsurface Profile Nine exploratory borings, ranging from 11.5 to 51.5 feet below ground surface were taken on September 1 t, 2005. Additional borings were conducted in 2ag6. l~'ill and alluvial deposits were encountered at the project site up to the maximum depth of 51.5 feet. Between 2-3 feet of fill consisting of silty sand was encountered in borings taken from driveways and front yards of existing residences. The upper 5 feet of soil had unsatisfactory relative compaction and is considered unsuitable for support of any structure or additional fill. Some variation in subsurt'ace conditions is anticipated. 3-15 Wilson Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2007 3.5.5 Ground Water Ground water was not encountered in any of the borings up to a depth of 51.5 feet below ground surface. In March 2Q05, ground water was measured at a depth of 286 feet below ground surface at a well located approximately ~/ mile northeast of the site. Historically, ground water at the same well was found at a depth of 210 feet below ground surface in April 1999. It should be noted that ground water levels could vary based an ground water pumping activities and precipitation. 3.5.6 Regulatory Framework State of California Earthquake Fault- Rupture Hazard Zone The 1994 State of California Earthquake Fault -Rupture Hazard Zone {formerly known as the Alquist~Priolo Earthquake Faulting Zone Act) was passed into law to establish zoning laws and regulations that prohibit the location of developments and structures for human occupancy across the trace of an active fault. Because of this act, cities and counties require, prior to the approval of a project, a sufficiently detailed geologic report defining and delineating any hazard of surface fault rupture. The project site is not located within a State of California Earthquake Fault Rupture Hazard Zone, nor is any fault known to project through or towards the site. It should be noted that surface fault rupture is not restricted to areas within State of California Earthquake Fault- Rupture Hazard Zones. Seismic Hazards iVlapping Act The Seismic Hazards Mapping Act was developed to protect the public from the effects of strong ground shaking, liquefaction, seismically induced landslides, and other seismic hazards. The act requires the Sfiate Geologist to delineate various seismic hazard zones and require cities, counties, and other local permitting agencies fio regulate certain development projects within these zones. Before a devebpment permit is granted for a site within a seismic hazard zone, a geotechnical investigation of the site has to be conducted and appropriate mitigation measures incorporated into the project design. 3.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materis~s This section describes potential hazards and related issues that may be associated with the project vicinity. This section describes issues related to the potential presence of hazardous materials and waste in the project vicinity. This section also includes a review of the locations of airfields relative to the project site and potential wildfire hazards relevant to this project. In addition, Geologic hazards are discussed in Section 3.5, "Geology and Sails" of this EIR and flood hazard issues are discussed in 5ectian 3.7, "Hydrology and Water Quality". The information in this section was obtained from a review of existing information for the project vicinity. This includes a Phase l Environmental Site Assessment (ESA} that was previously prepared for this project (URS 2004}. The results of this study are summarized in this section. 3-16 Wilson II 'tementary School Draft Fnvironmentai Impact Report December 2007 3.6.1 Genera! Site Description The project site is located within an established residential community. Most of the 41 parcels comprising the site have been developed with single family residences and associated out bui}dings. Adjacent properties are primarily developed with similar residential uses. Arrawview Middle School is situated an adjacent property to the south. 3.6.2 Hazardous Materials and Waste A hazardous material is defined in the California Cade of Regulations {CCR) Title 22, Section 66260.10 as: ...a substance or combination of substances which, because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics, may either {1) cause, or significantly contribute to, an increase in mortality ar an increase in serious irreversible, ar incapacitating reversible illness; ar {2) pose a substantial present ar potential hazard to human heath ar environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of or otherwise managed. Factors that influence the potential for health effects due to exposure to hazardous materials include the dose to which a person is exposed, the exposure frequency, the exposure pathway, and individual sensitivity to the material. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (IJRS 2004) was previously conducted for the project site to identify any environmental conditions that might exist that could affect the suitability of the site for development of an elementary schoo}. This assessment reviewed historic and current land uses far the site, enviranrnental agency databases, and other sources of information. ®hsenred Field Conditions . The project site consists of 41 parcels that are mostly developed with single family residences. During a field review, the only storage and use of hazardous materials observed is that which is typically associated with the residential dwellings. Minor ground staining was noted that was associated with parked vehicles. The study determined that the site is not located in an area with significant occurrences of radon ar naturally occurring asbestos-containing materials. Because of the age of the neighborhood, the existing dwellings within the project site most likely contain asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint (t_BP). The study noted the presence of five electrical transformers along the property boundaries. These transformers have the potential to contain polychlorinated biphenyls. However, the study concluded that this potential is low based on available retards. There is no sign of leakage from the transformers. 3-17 Wilson If Elementary School Draft Enviranmenfal Impact Deport December 2D07 Regulat®ry Agency Database Review As part of the Phase 1 ESA, a search of available environmental databases was conducted to obtain information on documented environmental concerns on or near the site. Information available from these databases includes known releases of hazardous materials and sites that use, store, treat, generate, dispose of, or otherwise handle hazardous materials. Table 3.6-1 provides a summary of the results of the database search. Table 3.6-1 Summary of Results from Database Review ,~ r + ? ".-- ~" r s, y -1~8t~i7f'1w~P. a = t~ ' ~ ~ 'i k ~ sa ~" .tea: ' s'- r ~ ~ s r ~- ' -~ ' .-`r^.v - r~ ~ .z... U ,. ri~ -.Sate ~ ~ .:~-~ ..A~~dres~~_ , ~ z ~~s_ ~sti~ w?~bt~n~~~s,~ ~- ,~.~. ~ .,,. r~..-,. ....- ..., _ , , ...~, ~ ~ . , r -, ,...-,,.. Onsite results None Results for Ad'acent Pro ernes HUD Intown 708 West 25 HAZN~T Household waste sent to Properties Street transfer station for disposal Intown Properties 572 West 25 HAZNFT Household waste sent to Inc/HUD Street transfer station for disposal Results within < 918 mile HUD Intown 2364 North G HA~N~T Site of a closed spill, leak, Properties Street investigation or cleanup of TPH/VOCs' Results between 118 and'/~ mile Narm's Automotive 635 West RCRlS-5QG Small quantity hazardous Highland Avenue FINDS waste generator with no violations. Jose's Tire Shop 687 West SWFILI= Waste tire facility with no Highland Avenue reported violations Jiffy Lube #1066 567 West San Bernardino Listed as an active facility with Highland Avenue County Permit a special handler and special generator status l<ragen Parts #1732 555 West San Bernardino Facility is permitted as a Highland Avenue County Permit hazardous materials handler, specializing in used oiE collection Auto L.ab & Fuel 847 West USTISan Listed as a facility that Highland Avenue Bernardino operates a U5T2. No reported County Permit violations or releases. 1X West Highland 431 West Cleaners Listed as a facility involved in Cleaners Highland Avenue dry cleaning. No reported violations or releases. 'TPHNOCs: Total petroleum hydrocarbons/volatile organic compounds zUST: Underground staragetank Source: URS 2004. 3-18 Wilson Il Elementary Schaal Draft Environmental lmpacf Raport December 2Q07 The project site did not appear in any of the environmental agency databases reviewed for this project. The facilities listed above are mostly either located at lower elevations or located down gradient from the site, relative to groundwater flow. The exception is Intown PrapertieslHUD, which handles household waste and disposes of it at a transfer station. No violations have been reported far this site. Agency Records Review The following agencies were contacted for records pertaining to the project site: California Regional Water Quality Control Board California State 1=ire MarshaPs Office Department. of Toxic Substances Control ® South Coast Air Quality Management District ® San Bernardino County l=ire Department, Hazardous Materials Division ® City of San Bernardino Department of Public Works Although no formal responses were received, the nature of the information already obtained suggests that there is a remote potential far these agencies to provide information indicating any hazardous materials issues not already discussed in this section. Groundwater Contamination In the vicinity of the project site, there are two contaminant plumes in the groundwater that underlies the area, known as the Muscoy and Newmark Plumes. The project site appears to be located above the Newmark Groundwafier Contaminant Plume. This plume has been designated as a Superf'und site due to high levels of trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene. 3.6.3 Airfield Operations The California Department of Education (CDE) requires school districts to determine proximity of proposed sites to airport runways (Education Code Section 17215 and CCR 14011). If the proposed school site is within two miles of an existing airport runway or a potential runway included in an airport master plan, the school district must notify CDE. The project vicinity was reviewed for the presence of active airports and private airfields that may present potential safety hazards. The closest airport is San Bernardino International Airport, which is approximately 3'/ miles to the south. The project site is well outside the Airport Area of Influence far this airport as indicated in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (City of San Bernardino 2005). There are no other public or private airfields within the general vicinity of the project. In addition, there are no airport land use plans that are relevant to this area. 3-19 Wilson II Elementary School 1]raft Environmental Impact Report L7ecember 2007 3.6.4 Wildfires The City of San Bernardina has previously assessed fire hazard issues associated with wildfires along the foothill areas and in the San Bernardino Mountains generally to the north of the project site. Fire hazard areas have been identified in these areas but the project site is located well outside of these designated hazard areas. (City of San Bernardino 2005) 3.T Hydrology and Water Quality 3.7.1 Surface Water Qrasite Hydrol®gy The proposed project site is located within a residential neighborhood with a slight southwestern gradient. No streams, rivers, or enclosed bodies of water are on or adjacent to the proposed site, nor does the site cross a perennial ar intermittent stream. The closest streams to the proposed site are Lytle Creek, 2.4 miles west of the site, and East Twin Creek, approximately 1.6 miles east of the proposed site. Runoff from the proposed project site drains to a curb and gutter system and then to regional flood control channels leading to the Santa Ana River. Approximately 70°/p of the proposed project site contains impervious surfaces including streets, sidewalks, buildings, hardscapes and similar structures. The site would be expected to produce urban runoff related pollutants associated with residential units such as sediments, nitrates, viruslbacteria, pesticides, ail and grease. Flo®ding Federal Emergency Management (FEMA) designates areas that lie in 100--year and 500~year flood plains. Although same portions of the City of San Bernardino fall with the prescribed FEMA 100-year flood plain, the proposed site is oat located within a 100- year flood plain as mapped on Federal Flood Hazard Boundary ar Flood Insurance Rate maps. The project site is not in a designated inundation zone as defined by the City of San Bernardina General Plan Update (2005). Vilater Quality The U.S. EPA has set forth national water quality standards. In accordance with Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. EPA has also created regulations under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control direct storm water discharges. In California the State Water Quality Control Board {SWCQB} controls permitting programs and has authority over wasfie discharge requirements. The proposed project would be implemented in accordance with all necessary waste discharge and water quality regulations, which would ensure that the quantity and quality of surface water flowing from the surface of the proposed site would not be violated. In addition, the proposed project doesn't involve any point source discharge and will not discharge any hazardous materials into surface or subsurface waters. Construction activities will require the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention ~-Zo Wilson I! Elementary School f)raft Environmental impact Report December 2007 Pfan (SWPPP} and the operation of the facility will require preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan. 3.7.2 Groundwater Site Groundwater Hydrolfogy Ground water was not encountered in any of the nine borings done nn the proposed site, up to a depth of 51.5 feet below ground surface. In March 2005, ground water was measured at a depth of 2$6 feet below ground surface at a well located approximately 3/ mile northeast of the site. Historically, ground water at the same well was found at a depth of 210 feet below ground surface in April 1999. It should be Hated that ground water levels could vary based on ground water pumping activities and precipitation. The San Bernardino Municipal Water District provides water services to the propnsed~ site. The San Bernardino Municipal Water District's primary source of water is ground water taken from the Bunker Hill Groundwater Basin, Santa Ana River snow melt, and springs originating from the San Bernardino Mountains. The State Water Project supplies supplemental water as needed. Ground Water Quality As mentioned in Section 3.6, "Hazards and Hazardous Materials", in the vicinity of the project site, there are two contaminant plumes in the groundwater that underlies the area, known as the Muscay and Newmark Plumes. The project site appears to be located above the Newmark Groundwater Contaminant Plume. This plume has been designated as a Superfund site due to high levels of trichlaroethylene and perchloroethylene. 3.~ Land Use and Planning The proposed project site is a residential neighborhood consisting of 40 homes. The site is zoned R5, single family residential with a density of 4.5 dwelling units per acre. This zoning district is designed to foster the development of single family homes with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The City of San Bernardino General Plan states land zoned residential can also be used far public/institutional uses such as schools, parks, and child care centers if determined to be "compatible and oriented towards the needs of residential neighborhoods." Land surrounding the proposed project site to the north, east, and west are all zoned RS1, and to the south, property an Highland Avenue is zoned commercial CG-1. The City of San Bernardino General Plan and Developmental Code serve as policies used to protect and manage resources and generally direct new development. Planners also work in conjunction with the San Bernardino County General Plan where adjacent, unincorporated areas are concerned. Twa Strategic Policy Areas, Urban Conservation and Enhancement Areas and Strategic Areas, are outlined in the land use section of the City of San Bernardino General Plan and are intended to help preserve, create, ar revitalize distinct areas of the city. 3-21 Wilson it Elementary Schoo! Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2007 The proposed project site is labeled Urban Conservation and Enhancement Area, and the General Plan focuses on "preservation and enhancement of existing neighborhoods and where fundamental changes in the land use pattern are not anticipated or desired.,` A key planning goal in Urban Conservation and Enhancement Areas is improving the quality of existing uses. Policies in the General Plan and Neighborhood Improvement Program guide enhancement in these areas. San Bernardino Unified School District is not under San Bernardino City's jurisdiction, but is a separate sovereign entity that must plan for its own growth. SBUSD has the ability to create new schools. 3:9 iVlineral Resources The proposed project site is underlain by Quaternary Alluvial deposits that may have some potential for sand and gravel. Because.the site has been used for residential purposes and the area is [orated within an urbanized area; it is not considered suitable for sand and grave! extraction. The area is also not noted on the City of San Bernardino's General Plan as an area containing important miners[ resources. 3.'I® iVoise 3.10.1 Acoustic Fundamentals Noise is often defined as unwanted sound. Sound is s mechanical form of radiant energy transmitted by pressure waves in the air. It is characterized by two parameters: amplitude (loudness} and frequency (tone). l~mplifiude Amplitude is the difference between ambient air pressure and the peak pressure of the sound wave. Amplitude is measured in decibels (dB) on a Iogsrithmic stale. For example, a 10 dB sound is 10 times the pressure difference of a 0 dB sound; a 20 dB sound is 100 times the pressure difference of a 0 dB sound. Another feature of the decibel scale is the way in which sound amplitudes from multiple sources add together. A 65 dB source of sound, sorb as a truck, when joined by another 65 dB source results in a sound amplitude of 68 dB, not 130 dB (i.e., doubling the source strength increases the sound pressure by 3 dB}. Amplitude is interpreted by the ear as corresponding to different degrees of loudness. Laboratory measurements correlate a 10 dB increase in amplitude with a perceived doubling of loudness and establish a 3 dB change in amplitude as the minimum audible difference perceptible to the average person. Frequency Frequency is the number of fluctuations of the pressure wave per second. The unit of frequency is the Hertz (Hz). One Hz equals one cycle per second. The human ear is not equally sensitive to sound of different frequencies. Sound waves befow 16 Hz or above 20,000 Hz cannot be heard at all, and the ear is more sensitive to sound in the higher portion of this range than in the lower. To approximate this sensitivity, environments[ sound is usually measured in A-weighted decibels (dBA}, 4n this stale, 3-22 ~lsnn !f Elementary Scltnn! Draft Environments! impact Report December 20(17 the normal range of human hearing extends from about 10 dBA to about 140 dBA. Common noise levels are depicted in Figure 3.10-1. Noise ®escriptors The intensity of environmental noise fluctuates over time, and several descriptors of time-averaged noise levels are used. The three most commonly used descriptors are L~q, I_d~, and CNEI~. The energy-equivalent noise level, I...e~, is a measure of the average energy content {intensity) of noise over any given period. Many communities use 24- hour descriptors of noise levels to regulate noise. The day--night average noise level, L..d~,, is the 24-hour average of the noise intensify, with a 10-dBA "penalty" added for nighttime noise (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) to account for the greater sensitivity to noise during this period. CNEI_, the community equivalent noise level, is similar to L~,~ but adds an additional 5-dBA penalty for evening noise (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.). Noise analyses often depend on measurements of I_~~~, the maximum instantaneous noise level during a specific period of time (sometimes referred to as the "peak noise level"), and L~,;,,, the minimum instantaneous noise level during a specific period. Characteristics of Sound Propagation and Attenuation Noise can be generated by a number of sources, including mobile sources, such as automobiles, trucks and airplanes, and stationary sources, such as construction sites, machinery, and industrial operations. Noise generated by mobile sources typically attenuates st s rate between 3.0 to 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance. The rate depends on the ground surface and the number or type of objects between the noise source and the receiver. Hard and flat surfaces, such as concrete or asphalt, have an attenuation rate of 3.0 dBA per doubling of distance. Soft surfaces, such as uneven or vegetated terrain, have an attenuation rate of about 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance. Noise generated by stationary sources typically attenuates at a rate of 6.0 to 7.5 dBA per doubling of distance. Human Response to Noise The human response to environments! noise is subjective and varies considerably from individual to individual. Noise in the community has often been cited as a health problem, not in terms of actual physiological damage, such as hearing impairment, but in terms of inhibiting general well-being and contributing to undue stress and annoyance. The health effects of noise in the community arise frarn interference with human activities, including sleep, speech, recreation, and tasks that demsnd concentration or coordination. Hearing loss can occur st the highest noise intensity levels. When community noise interferes with human activities or contributes to stress, public annoyance with the noise source increases. The acceptability of noise and the threat to public well-being are the basis for land use planning policies preventing exposure to excessive community noise levels. Because construction activities typically are short term, the associated effects of construction-generated noise typically are limited to annoyance and interference with speech. In an exterior noise environment, noise levels in excess of 60 dBA are generally considered to have an appreciable degree of speech interference. The level at which speech interference occurs is based on an average sentence comprehension 3 - 23 Wilson iI Elementary Schooi Draft Environmental Impact Repart December 2007 Figure 3.10-~ Typical Noise Levels Perceived 1NDbORg R-tNeighted Loudness Relative pUTAaQRS C78cibels fo Bq dk3A 14D Threshold of Pain x256 Military Jet Takeoff with Afterburner (at 56 feet) 130 x12& r;:~ ? -,m: ~:m'. ,:;:m: 121) '~"~''° x64 Jet Takeoff at 2170 Feet ~, , V,, Rock Band .n 110 ~ '. x32 a_, ry-.:z:~t~= o;~ 747-1II0 Takeoff (4 Miles From Start of Rall) ;;ut~ [ Inside Subway Train, Mew York 3 10(3 x16 Power Lawnmower (at 50 Feet) Ambulance Siren {at 1 f1p Feet) Noisy Cocktail Bar 90 .~'„ xg 727-20Q Takeoff (4 Miles From Start of RoE!) ~-:: n ~"~"~ f)iasel Truck, 40 mph {ai 50 Fest) ~' -; Jet Aircraft Cabin, at Cruise °7< Shouting {at 3 Feet) 80 x4 Automobite, 65 mph {at 50 Feet) Ti Noisy Restaurant o Busy Street (at 50 Feat) a;t~;' y' ' x2 757-2011 Takeoff.(4 Miles From Start of Rolf) Vacuum Cloaner at3 Feet 7C1,~;? ms ` Autamabifs, 30 mph (at 5fl Feet} Large Business office v ;, 60 ' x1 Cessna 172 Landing (3,3110 Feet From Rwy End) Normal Conversation (at 3 Feet) ~,,a ,_, Quiet Office ~ '` >t~_,:r 50 ~ x112 `s';~'_ -td -- i>:ra;i~ 40 '"~ x114 Quiet Urban Area, Mightlime Quiet Library Quiet Suburban Area, Nighttime 30 ,~i'i x118 Quiet Rural Area, NighllimE Concert Hatl, Background file; ,d'd>;: 20 x1116 Recording Studio „a~;,'~; Leaves Rustling 10 ~='";i X1132 `.4t . ;a 3 ~:., ~;-; 0 Threshold of Hearing x1!64 Sauecas: Califnmia Department of Transportation, January 20Q2, California Airpon Land Use Planning Handbook, M. David Egan, McGraw Nill, 1972, Concepts in ArchifecfuralAcoustics; end V.S. Dapariment at Housing and Urban Development, Office of Community Planning and Development, The Noise Guidebook. 3-24 Wilson Elementary School ©raff Environmental Impact Report December 2007 rate of approximately 98% at 5 meters. Greater speaker-listener distances would be passible indoors at the same level of vocal effort and speech intelligibility because sound pressure levels diminish mare slowly than predicted by the inverse square law, which is typically used in the exterior environment (EPA 1971). Unfortunately, there is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise ar of the corresponding reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. This is primarily because of the wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance and habituation to noise over differing individual experiences with noise. Thus, an important way of determining a person's subjective .reaction to a new noise is the comparison of it to the existing environment to which one has adapted: the sa--called "ambient" environment. In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will be judged by the hearers. Regarding increases in A-weighted noise levels, knowledge of the following relationships {EPA 1971) will be helpful in understanding this analysis: • Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dB cannot be perceived by humans. ® Outside of the laboratory, a 3-dB change is considered ajust-perceivable difference. ~ A change in level of at least 5 dB is required before any noticeable change in community response would be expected. • A 10-dB change is subjectively heard as approximately a doubling in loudness and would almost certainly cause an adverse change in community response. 3.10.2 Regulatory Framework State of California General Plan Guidelines The State of California General Plan Guidelines (State of California 2002), published by the State Governor's Office of Planning and Research, provides guidance far the acceptability of projects within specific CNEUL~„ contours. Recommended noise criteria far various land uses are summarized in Table 3.10-1. As depicted, school uses are considered to be "normally acceptable" in areas where exterior noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA CNEULd,,. However, school uses should be considered "conditionally acceptable" in areas where exterior noise levels range from 60 to 70 dBA CNEL/Ldp,. A "conditionally acceptable" designation implies that new construe#ion or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction measures is made and needed noise insulation features incorporated. Incorporation of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems into the building design to facilitate the closure of windows is typically considered sufficient to mitigate in#eriar noise levels for sites located within "conditionally acceptable" noise regions. Development is typically considered "normally unacceptable"' in areas exceeding 70 dBA CNEL/Ldp,, The guidelines also present adjustment factors that may be used to arrive at noise acceptability standards that reflect the noise control goals of the community, the • particular community's sensitivity to noise, and the community`s assessment of the relative importance of noise pollution. 3 - 25 Wilson Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2pQ7 Table 3.'10- Mate of California General Plan Guidelines Community Noise Criteria for Land Use Compatibility P, ~'~~MM~~t1.~N4t.~~ ~P~fSURE, E.XTN~Rl.C3R ~1±tE~.,1Lld~,""~~~:. ~.ANN~ USN= '~.Normally ~csnd~tit~f~aN~ ~ G~neratly:, f.~~n€d~se~ , ; ,....}rte.-~ ~._r::.., ~w~ ,.. '.w .t1.~!~e tale , `74cce _table..... r~n~c~~ ..t~bl~... ~~s+~~ura ~:~..,~ Residential Low-Density Single Family, Duplex, <60 55 - 70 70 -- 75 >75 Mobile Haines Residential Multi-family <66 60 - 70 70 - 75 >75 Transient Lodging -Motels, <65 60 - 70 70 _ 80 >80 Hotels Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, <70 60 - 70 70 - 80 >80 Nursing Homes Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Nat Specified <70 Nat Specified >65 Amphitheaters Sports Arena, Outdoor Not Specified <75 Not Specified >70 Spectator Sports Playgrounds, Neighborhood <70 Not Specified 67.5 - 75 >72.5 Pa rEcs Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, <75 Not Specified 7D - 80 >$0 Cemeteries Office Buildings, Business Commercial and <70 67.5 - 77.5 >75 Not Specified Professional ]ndustriaf, Manufac#uring, <75 70 - 80 >75 Not Specified Utilities, Agriculture Normally Acceptablo: Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional constructinn, without any special noise insulation requirements. Cond'€tionalfy Acceptable: New construction yr development should be under#aken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is made and needed noise insulation €eatures included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems nr air conditioning will normally suffice, Generally Unacceptable: New construction nr development should generally be discouraged. If new vonstruction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis o€ the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed nnise insulation features included In the design. Land Use O"sscouraged: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. 5nurce: State of California 2D03. California ®apartment of Education Regulations The California Department of Education (CDE) requires a!I school districts to select school sites #hat support learning. Because the CDE recognizes that unwanted sound can be distracting and can present an obstacle to learning, CDE Regulations (CCR Title 5, Division 1, Chapter 13, Section 1~090(q)) require the school district to consider noise impacts during the site selection process. 3-26 Wilson 1! Elementary Schoo! Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2007 City of San Bernardino Section 19.20.030.15 of the San Bernardino Development Code specifies maximum acceptable levels of noise far residential uses in the City. Exterior noise levels at residential locations should not exceed 65 dBA. Interior levels should not exceed 45 dBA in any habitable room. Section 8.54.020 of the City's Municipal Cade states that between the hours of 1 D p.m. and 8 a.m., the operation and use of pile drivers; steam shovels; pneumatic hammers; derrick, steam or electric hoists; power driven saws, or any similar tools or apparatus is prohibited. In addition, Section 8.54.060 states that "Activities conducted on the grounds of any public ar private school during regular hours of operation" are exempted from the provisions of this chapter of the Municipal Code. The San Bernardino General Plan (City of San Bernardino 2005} contains a series of policies within the Noise Element designed to meet specific noise-related goals. Some of these policies, listed below are relevant to this project: Policy 94.1. ~ Minimize, reduce, ar prohibit, as may be required, the new development of housing, health care facilities, schools, libraries, religious facilities, and other noise sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A} exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB{A) interior if the noise cannot be reduced to these levels. Policy 94.3.9 Require that construction activities adjacent to residential units be limited as necessary to prevent adverse noise impacts. Policy 14.3.2 Require that construction activities employ feasible and practical techniques that minimize the noise impacts on adjacent uses. The San Bernardino General Plan uses the same land use compatibility guidelines described in Table 3.10-1 above. 3.10.3 Existing Noise-Sensitive Land Uses Noise-sensitive land uses generally include those uses where exposure to noise would result in adverse effects, as well as uses where quiet is an essential element of their intended purpose. The project site is located in a developed residential neighborhood. Single family residences are located adjacent to the project site on the west, north, and east sides Arrowview Middle School. Each of these land uses is considered naise- sensitive. 3.10.4 Existing Noise Environment A noise analysis was conducted for this project that included a survey to determine the ambient noise levels for the project vicinity (URS 2005x). The existing noise environment has not substantially changed since that time. Three short-term (1-hour or less) measurements and one long-term (24-hours or more) measurement were taken on-site and on adjacent areas. The tang-term measurement was taken near the intersection of G Street and 26~~' Street at the northwest carnet of the site and resulted 3-27 Wilson 11 'lementary School Draft Environmental Impact Repgrt December 2007 in a measurement of 64 dBA CNEL. The three short-term measurements ranged from 61.E to 65.0 L~~. 3.~1'~ Popu~ati®n and H®using According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the City of San Bernardino had an estimated population of over 201,000 persons. Approximately 35 percent of this population was 18 years old or younger. There were approximately 63,500 housing units in the City in 2000 with approximately 52.5 per cent owner occupied. Population in the houses would range from 200 to 250 people. The proposed site is bordered by "G" Street to the West, "F" Street to the East, 26th Street to the North and is directly adjacent to Arrow View Middle School to the South. The area is consists of 41 parcels and consists of approximately 370,260 square feet, yr approximately 8.7 acres. The subject site is currently occupied by forty single family homes and one vacant lot that is owned by the adjacent homeowner. Homes currently associated with the neighborhood were built in the1920s and 1930s and are examples of the Tudor Revival and Bungalow style 'of architecture_ The properties are well maintained and many have undergone recent improvements. Approximately seventy percent of the homes in question are owner occupied and many residents have lived in the neighborhood for many years. 3,'~2 Pt.l~?~IC SF:CV~C~S This section contains a description of public services that are relevant to the project vicinity, including fire and police protection, schools, and parks. This information was obtained from the City of San Bernardino General Plan (City of San Bernardino 2005) and the City of San Bernardino website (City of San Bernardino 2007). 3.12.1 Fire Protection Fire prevention, fire protection, and emergency medical service in the project vicinity are provided by the San Bernardino City Fire Department_ There are twelve fire stations in San Bernardino. The Fire Department maintains a response time of six minutes within the City. The Fire Department has mutual faint response agreements with the cities of Loma Linda, Cnltnn, Rialto; the Central Valley Fire District (Station #75, in Muscoy}; and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. In addition to local joint response, all fire departments in the State are signatory to a master mutual aid agreement to provide assistance for major incidents. 3.12.2 Police Protection Police services are provided by the City Police Department within the City limits, which has 312 sworn officers on its rolls (City of San Bernardino 2007}. The City Police Department operates under a mutual aid agreement with police agencies in the surrounding cities to increase the department's overall capabilities. The San Bernardino 3 - 28 Wilson !1 elementary 5choo! Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2DD7 Police Department maintains a ratio of approximately one sworn officer for every 625 residents. The County Sheriff operates from an office in the City of San Bernardino and provides mutual backup services upon request within bath the City and unincorporated areas. The California Highway Patrol operates in the San Bernardino area, providing traffic patrol an state highways and also an roads within the unincorporated areas of the County. The Highway Patrol also provides emergency response backup to the police department and the County Sheriff upon request. Police protection on the school sites are also provided by the SBCUSD District police. The department provides site security and routine police functions at the school site_ The Department coordinates closely with the City of San Bernardino Police Department. 3.12.3 Schaals San Bernardino City Unified Schaal District maintains public schools in the City of San Bernardino. The district has a total of 65 schools, including 41 elementary schools, eight middle schools, and seven high schools. Arrowview Middle School is adjacent to the project site. (San Bernardino City Unified School District 2007} 3.12.4 Parks The City of San Bernardino Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Department oversees 52 developed parks and recreational facilities in the City, including 19 neighborhood parks, 10 community parks, 17 mini-parks, 3 regional parks and three special facilities. The parks contain a broad range of facilities; including children's play equipment, tennis and volleyball courts, and athletic fields. The special facilities include community buildings and senior centers. The City utilizes a park acreage standard of five acres per 1,000 residents. This is one acre greater than the land required by the state's Quimby Act, which requires developers to provide land and/or fees foe new parks based on a standard of four acres per thousand residents. Based on the Gity's standard, '1,596.2 acres of total parkland are necessary to satisfy the projected population at buildout. (City of San Bernardino 2005} 3.13 F~ub[~c Utilities This section describes public utilities that exist within the project vicinity. The City of San Bernardino General Plan (City of San Bernardino, 2005} was the primary source for this information. 3.13.1 Water Service The San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD} provides domestic water for the City of San Bernardino and unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County as well as back-up to the City of Loma Linda. Groundwater from the Bunker Hill Basin is the primary source of water supply far the SBMWD. Other sources of water supply 3 - 29 Wilson 1l Elemenfary School Draft 'nvironmenfal Impact Report December 2Q07 include surface sources such as the State Water Project, the Santa Ana River, Mill Creek, and Lytle Creek. Water supply to the project site and adjacent neighborhood is provided by SBMWD. 3.13.2 Wastewater The City of San Bernardino Public Works Department is responsible for the design and construction of wastewater collection facilities in the City. Operation and maintenance of wastewater collection facilities is the responsibility of the Public Services Department. Wastewater collection facilities for the project site and adjacent neighborhood are owned and operated by the City of San Bernardino {Public Works and Public Services Departments}. 3.13.3 Solid Waste Solid waste collection within the City of San Bernardino, including the project site is provided by the City's Department of Public Services. Solid waste is collected and disposed of at landfills in Colton and Fontana owned and operated by the County of San Bernardino. When the Caftan and Mid Valley Landfill eventually close, solid waste generated in the City will be transported to the San Timateo Landfill, also owned and operated by the County of San Bernardino. 3.94 R~:creati®n The City of San Bernardina Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Department maintains 52 developed parks and recreational facilities within the city boundaries. This breaks dawn into nineteen neighborhood parks, ten community parks, seventeen mini- parks, three regional parks, and three special facilities (City of San Bernardina, 2005}. In addition, San Bernardino City Unified School District has 65 school sites within the city that each has playground areas, playing fields, and some with gymnasium facilities. Within the project vicinity, there are three recreation facilities of Hate. Adjacent to the project site is Arrowview Middle School, which has recreational facilities including a running track The City of San Bernardino maintains two recreational facilities near the project site. Campo Santo Memorial Park is a 5.5-acre mini-park located northeast of the project site at the southeast corner of the intersecfinn of North E Street and West 27rh Street. Perris Hill Senior Center is located south of the project site on Highland Avenue. The City of San Bernardina General Plan (City of San Bernardina, 2005} has a Parks, Recreation, and Trails Element that describes the City's planning vision for recreation within the city. One of the policies in this element pertains to public schools: Policy 8.9.10 Maintain and expand cooperative arrangements with the San Bernardino Unified Schaal District, City Municipal Water Department, Cal State San Bernardina and San Bernardino Valley College far after hour and summertime use of parks, pools, concert halls, and other facilities. 3-30 Wilson !1 Elementary School ©ratt Environmental Impact Report December 20(17 3.15 T'raff. is and T~ans~®~ation The trafl=tc and circulation analysis for this project was prepared by Urban Crossroads {Urban Crossroads 2007) and is incorporated into the following discussion of conditions in the project area. This study has been included with this EIR as Appendix B. 3.15.1 Traffic Analysis Methodology and Study Area The traffic analysis performed for this project used methodologies consistent with the San Bernardino Congestion Management 1?rogram Traffic Study Guidelines. In addition, the traffic study was developed in consultation with the City of San Bernardino. l=figure 3.15--1 shows the tentative school boundary for the new school and the locations of streets and intersections analyzed in the traffic study. The intersections included in the analysis include: ® H Street/l~lighland Avenue ® G Street128th Street • G StreetlCourtland Drive G Street126th Street (westerly) ® G Street/26th Street (easterly) ® G Streetl25th Street a G Street/24th Street p G Street/23rd Street ® G StreetlHighland Avenue Streetl26th Street E Streetl28th Street ® E Street/Highland Avenue 3-31 EXHIBIT 1-A L~C~'~I~~I MI~P i~ f i • 28TH ST. y.~ ~ N ~ N W N S C7 W ~ 27TH 57. ~ ~ . I COURTLAND DR. 26TH 5T. i 26TH ST. ?6TH 5T. '~ii'Siii? t~~~'j'IT~r~~ p:::.;,,-~.:.::~.i,:.._.:~_.,:=''I - 25TH ST. y ..:y a 24TH ST. asTHST. ~ J r A U 23ftD ST. {TO a¢ A6At7DONE91 HIGHLAND AV. r i L~GEPIQa -^ =POTENTIAL SCHOOL ~ I ~ ATTEN€3ANCE p ~ BOUNDARY Q .3 ~ ~ - = TO SE ABANOpNED ~ ® = INTERSECTipN 'i ANALYSIS LOCATION 1 S ~ 'I ' ~ ~ ~ r 75TH ST. ~ 1Li d i1. r p V1liL5pN li ELEMENTARY SCHOpL, San Berrtardirta, California - 03429: 01 tlRF3At~ ~ a 5,~e~~ m ~ DRAwN BY: D. FAIiRNEY E I LOCATION MAP Rf=VISEDBY: D. FAI~RNEY ~ ul n 1374 Valley Visfa Drive, Suite 150 CHECKED BY: JW ~X¢ Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ww~ PN. (909) 396-0335 FAX. (9Q9) 396-1324 WILSON II ELEMENTARY SChtOOL FIGURE wuvw.klelnfelder.com SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ~ ~ DRAWN: 03f23l07 APPROVED BY' PRO.lECT NO. &4477 FILE NAME:3-95-1.dwg O tsy KlelrEfelder fne„ 21107 Wilson 11 elementary School Draft ~nvlrenmentat Impacf Report December 2(107 To quantify existing conditions in the study area, traffic taunts were performed. Using this baseline firaffrc count data, a refined list of intersections fia be analyzed was developed and the PM peak hour was adjusted for local streets, such as G Street, to the period between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m., compared to the more heavily traveled streets that would have a more typical 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. PM peak period. Traffic conditions for the fallowing analysis years were evaluated in the traffic study: ® Existing Conditions - 2007 ® Interim Year - 2010 {Project fully implemented) Horizon Year - 2030 (L.ong Range General Plan Year) For the two future years, conditions were evaluated with and without implementation of the project. The level of service (LOS) definitions used in the traffic analysis is described in Tables 3.15-1 and 3.15-2 below. Table 3.15-1 }y Lev,¢el of Service Descriptions for tlniniterrupted Traffic Flows A Represents free flaw. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. B Within the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable_ Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver. C Within the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. D High-density but stable flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience_ E Operating conditions are at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a law, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow will cause breakdowns in traffic movement. F Forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point_ Queues form behind such locations. 3-33 Wilson 1! ~Iementary Schoaf .draft hvironmenta! impact Report December 2007 In interrupted flaw areas such as the project area, {flow restrained by traffic signals or other controls}, LOS definitions are slightly different depending on the type of trafFc control present. Table 3.'15-2 Level of Serviice Descriptions for intersections. E ~ ~ A~I~~A~IE~"T~T~LS ~-~~ ~ e ~-~. ~ DELA'I~~'EiR,~II~F~MC~L~ ~x~. m ~ 71 ~ 6 ~..~~Ir~.~~e~fl~y~ ~-~~.wJ~+l~~~l :-i' ~~' C"'[/'~G/y~.y~w1 "4.a.. S .(" a3 ~~fy~¦ "S{)~ ~.~5 [.,` p F~4~,~8~~VIY r :i`+~,rv.w ~~~~~~EAn~,l1w+~. ...e~~i...: c,~~~~~fl W~~1~~~~~ "w" A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.0'1 to 50.00 F 80.01 and up 50.01 and up 3.15.2 Existing Roadway System and Daily Traffic Volumes Figure 3.15-2 shows the existing lane configurations and traffic controls within the study area. Highland Avenue through the study area is a four lane divided roadway. E Street is a four lane undivided roadway north of Highland Avenue and a two lane undivided roadway south of Highland Avenue. All other roadways within the study area are two lane undivided roads: The City of San Bernardino General Plan shows Highland Avenue and E Street as Major Arterials. H and G Streets are shown as Secondary Arterials. Figure 3.15-3 depicts the existing average daily traffic {ADT) volumes in the study area. As illustrated, H"tghland Avenue carries up to 25,600 vehicles per day {VPD) within the study area. 28th Street carries up to 1,r^i00 VPD, while E Street carries a maximum ADT of 11,700. The remaining roadways within the study area carry less than 10,000 VPD. 3-34 EXHIBIT 3-A EXISTING NUNIHER ~F THROUGH LANES AN1~ INTERSECTI®N CC~NTRl~LS -~. ~I INSET A ~ a IN 0~ ~' ~ ' T ~ COllA7lAN0 ' I~ UR S+ +v 28TH $T. H' ~ 2U 2U 2U 2U 2bT11 ST. ! ~ y ~ F i 'I I ~ ~ N a i• N w ~ ! ~- 27fH ST. ~ 'SEEINSEr A^ ~~'~~' i 2sm sT. COI}RTL.4ND DEZ, j„ u 28TH 5T. - j ' ~ j 28TH 5T. 1 2y711 sr. -f ~I 25l'H 5T : * S ~.~I. ~' i~ ~ p .t ~ %:`. { ~T< : ~,::~) ~.17T.~.r:~~ 25Th 57. .,1 ~ y~~ rn ~I~ ' 1 1 1 f~ e~.s A 2aTt15T. t ,:; ta.. W a:o 25TH ST. ~~"~~i ~ Ic71i 5T. '~ ~ ~ _ F I ~ ,~ ~ . F ~ ~ 23RD ST ~ ,:' --1T09f A60.NFIONfo} ~ +3~ N ~ ~ 2380 57. r ~ N #iSGHLANDAV. F -~ ab aD . qD 4D ' ~ , ~ ~ N ~ ~ 1 i g T TRAFFIC SIGNAL CJ -~- ~ STOP SIGN 0 4 =NUMBER OF lANES b ~ bIV1I3ED ""1 U ~ UNDIVIbEp J Lam]. l,L nj W11.50N II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, Cal'rfornia - 03429w 12 ~~~~„A~ ~ U _ W _ .._~..,~.~.._ .-.. -__mw._._ a`~ rn ~ EXISTING NUMIBER OF flRAwN BY: p. FAHRNEY I THROUGH LANES aN© REVISE©BY: p. FAHRNEY ~~w~ 1374 Valley Visfa prive, Suife 150 INTERSECTI®N ~®NTRC)LS ~XV Diamond Bar, CA 91765 CHECK)MDBY: JW ~ ~ r~ PH. (909) 396-0335 FAX. (909} 396-132+3 WILSON II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FIGURE UC~3~ www.kteinfelder.com 5AN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIEp SCHOOL pISTRICT Q Q ~ BAN BERNARpINO, CALIFORNIA ~ ¦ ~ a ~ ~ DRAWN: 43/23/47 APPRQVE~p BY: PRO.tECT NO. 64477' FILE NANtE:3-15-2.dwg J © ny Klelnfesaer lnc., 200 EXHIBIT 3_g EXsrw~~ ~VER~~E ~LV rR~FFc ~~~r~ P 1 i~ ; r a 8 ~ 28TH ST. ?.5 7.6 7.6 1.4 j 1 ziTH sT. j r~i COiJRTLANb DR. ~ 0 0.7 i - 26TH ST. ~ 1 0.7 " p,3 26TH-I ST. a 1 - r, _ _ i ~' ~ 7 25TH ST. ~ ' ~ c Cs " ~ w 0.9 E ~IT'E.: i 25TH ST.. - s ~ 24TH ST. i _ ' ~;';~ ~ ~ i . ~ 0.5 • -- ~ ¢ U N 7 ~ ~ zs€~D sr. ~ ,n,, 1 N ~ 1 N r ' ~ Irj ~ ` HIGHLA{JD AV. ~ 24.6 25.6 23.4 22.5 1 ~ ~ - g 1 ~' ~ ! d U I.EGEN~c ~ 70.0 ~ VEHICLES PER DAY ('!000'5} CJ _1 Q WIL54N 11 ELEMENTARY SCHQOL, San Bernard€no, Cali€ornia ~ 03429: 2i ~ URBAN f/1 Ib ~ EXISTING AVERAGE DRAWN BY: D. FAMRNEY ~w ®AII_Y TRAFFIC REVISED F3Y: D: FAHRNEY ~ W 1374 Valley Vista Drive, Suite 150 CHECKED SY: JW ~X¢ Diamond Bat, CA 9'(785 PH. (9{19) 396-0335 FA)C. (989) 396-9324 WILSON II ELEMENTARY SChI00L FIGURE www.kleinfelder.com SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO, CAL11=0RNIA ~ ~ ~ n DRAWN: 031231{77 APPROVED BX;w.,_,._....~.. PROJECT NO. 64477 FILE NANtE:3-'15-3.dwg ® by Kfelnfetder Inc., 20pT Wilson I! Efementary Schoo! 17raft Envlronmenfal Impact Repot! ©ecember 2007 3.15.3 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Existing intersection level of service calculations are based upon manual A.M. and P.M. peak hour turning movement taunts. Peak period traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix "E". The A.M. peak hour traffic volumes were determined by Counting the two-hour period between 7 - 9 AM in the morning. Similarly, the P.M. peak hour traffic volumes were identified by Counting the two-hour period from 2 to 4 P.M. for 8 intersections and 4 fia 6 P.M. for four {4) intersections in the evening as discussed previously. 3.15.4 Existing Traffic Operations Existing peak hour traffic operations were evaluated for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours throughout the study area. The results of this analysis, along with the control devices at each analysis location, are summarized in Table 3.15-3. As indicated in the table, all of the study area intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service during the peak hours. Table 3.~5-3 Intersection Analysis for Exiisting Conditions ~~....~;ln't~r~~ct~on.~~,.„,~~f. ~7"ra~'tc~C-o~rt~ro~.~ ~:.~#Mj~.,.PIiM~.~~ .~~4A~..~f~'~ `~~1: H Street at Highland Avenue TS 18.8 11.0 B B G Street at 28 Street CSS 12.4 9.6 B A Caurtland Drive CSS 9.8 9.4 A A 26 Street West CSS 9.9 9.0 A A 26 Street East CSS 10.1 9.6 B A 25 Street GSS 9.7 9.7 A A 24 Street CSS 10.7 9.3 B A 23r Street CSS 10.2 9.5 B A Highland Avenue TS 16.3 10.6 6 B F Street at 26 Street East GSS 8.5 8.5 A A E Street at 28 Street CSS 21.1 19.8 C C Highland Avenue TS 28.9 30.5' C C TS~-#raffic signal CSS-crass street stop 3-37 Wilson If 'fementary 5choof Draft Fnviranmental Impact f~2epart December 2007 THIS PAGE IS INTEIdTIGNALLY LEFT 13LAN1~( 3-38 Wilson 1f Elemenfary Schoo! Draff Environmental fmpact Report December, 2p07 4.1.1 Significance Thresholds The proposed project impacts would have significant impacts to aesthetics if the project would: Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, ® Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway; ® Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site or its surroundings; or ® Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect nighttime or daytime views in the area. 4.1.2 I*ess Than Significant Impacts Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista The proposed project site and the surrounding area are relatively flat and do not contain scenic vistas. It is also net part of the viewshed for a scenic vista. Therefore, the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on a scenic vista. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway The proposed project is not located within a state scenic highway and therefore will not impact a scenic highway. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site or its surroundings The proposed project will result in the changing of the site from a residential area to an elementary school. Both areas will be landscaped. Although the use of the site will be changed, the- overall visual character as an urban residential community will net be substantially degraded. The proposed project will include landscaping with trees, turf and other landscaping plants. 1=urthermore the buildings will be designed to be compatible with the neighborhood. Therefore this impact is not considered significant. ~-~ Wilson 11 Elementary Schoa! Drat Environmental Impact Report December, 20Q7 4.1.3 Significant Impacts Create a new source of sulastantial light or glare which would adversely affect nighttime or daytime diews in the area Construction of the new school will introduce additional lighting far security and other uses to the area near the building area. Athletic fields will not be lighted. This may be of greater intensity than the street lighting and other lighting associated with the residential area. This is a potentially significant impact that could affect adjacent areas and residences. Implementation of mitigation will reduce this impact to a less-than- significant level. 4.1.4 Mitigation Measures 14~~114,'9-~: L.igh#ing at the school will be of low intensity and directed toward the facility (away from adjacen# properties) to minimize lighting impacts on adjacent properties. This shielding will reduce impacts from direct glare fio neighboring properties. 4.1.5 Significant and Unavoidable Impac#s No significant unavoidable impacts are an#icipafied involving aesfihetics. 4.2 Air Quality 4.2.'1 Significance Thresholds The SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook (South Coast Air Quality Management District '1993) provides specific guidance for conducting air quality analyses within the SCAB that are- based on the air quality management strategy being pursued by the district. The handbook provides a methodology for screening projects and quantifying project emissions. Specific quantitafiive significance thresholds are provided for projects within the SCAB. 1=or operational emissions, the SCAQMD has established the fallowing thresholds for project operations: ® Reactive organic compounds (ROC): 55 pounds per day m NOx: 55 pounds per day e CO: 550 pounds per day ® PM~o: 150 pounds per day ® PM~.~: 55 pounds per day • SOx: 150 pounds per day w State one-hour and eight-hour CO standard Projects with emissions exceeding these thresholds are considered to have a significant impact. ~-z WifsarT fl Fl~mentary Schaal Draft Envirar7mentaf impact Report L7ecem6er, 2007 The same process pertains to emissions associated with construction activities. Screening criteria are applied to determine whether additional quantification is necessary. if additional analysis is required, the following emissions have been established far praject construction activities: ® ROC: 2.5 tons per quarter (nat to exceed 75 pounds per individual day) ® NOx: 2.5 tons per quarter (not to exceed 100 pounds per individual day) CO: 24.75 tans per quarter (not to exceed 550 pounds per individual day) PM~o: f.75 tons per quarter (nat to exceed 150 paunds per individual day) ® PM2.5: 55 pounds per day SOx: 6.75 tans per quarter (not to exceed 150 pounds per individual day) Projects with construction emissions exceeding these thresholds are considered to have a significant impact. In addition to the above thresholds, a project would be considered to have a significant impact on air quality if the project c©uld: Interfere with the attainment of federal or state ambient air quality standards by either violating or contributing to an existing or projected air quality violation. a Result in population increases with the regional statistical area which would be in excess of that projected in the a'rr quality management plan and in other planned locations for the project's build-out year. Generate vehicle trips that cause a CC7 hot spot. Have the potential to create or be subjected to an objectionable odor that could impact sensitive receptors. ® Have hazardous materials on site and could result in an accidental release of air toxic emissions or acutely hazardous materials posing a threat to public health and safety. Emit an air toxic contaminant regulated by SCAQIVID rules or that is on a federal or state air toxic list. Involve burning of hazardous, medical, or municipal waste as waste-to- energy facilities. ® Be occupied by sensitive receptors within a quarter mile of an existing facility that emits air toxics identified in ®istrict Rule 9409 (New Source Review of carcinogenic air contaminants} or near CD hot spots. Emit carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants that individually or cumulafively exceed the maximum individual cancer risk of 90 in 9 million. 4-3 Wilson .Elementary Schoo! Draft E'nvlronmenta! Impact Report December, 2007 4.2.2 Less Than Significant Impacts Interfere with the attainment of federal or state ambient air quality standards by either violating or contributing to an existing or projected air quality violation. For this project, air emissions were estimated far bath the construction and operation of this praject. Ta calculate these emissions, the URBEMIS 2007 model was used {version 9.2.2}. This model was developed to estimate air emissians far land developments projects in California tailored to specific air basins in the state. The model can be used to estimate emissions associated with the construction, area sources, and operation of the project. The model also allows the user to apply mitigation measures to show quantifiable air emissians reductions. Operational vehicle emissions were calculated using standard model assumptions for the vehicle flea mix and travel conditions. Area source emissions were also estimated for activities such as the use of fuel far heating and landscape maintenance and architectural coatings. Appendix D provides the model results and assumptions generated by the >.RBEMIS model far this project. Table 4.2W1 shows the results of this analysis. The daily emissions shown are far worst case conditions. fable 4.2-1 Estimated Area S®urce and Operational Vehicular Emissions Pounds per Days Roc ~o~ co soy ~~,o r~M~.5 Area Source (Pounds per day) 0.28 0.41 1.94 O.D O.D D Operational Vehicular (Pounds per day} 6.84 1D.44 72.71 0.06 10.27 2.03 Total Operational ~rnissians 7.12 ~1D.85 74.65 D.D6 10.27 2.03 SCAQMD Daily Threshold (pounds per 55 55 550 15D 150 55 da As indicated in the table, total operational emissions are very minor compared to the thresholds set by SCAQMD. Operational emissions generated by this project are considered less than significant. IResult in population increases within the regional statistical area which would be in excess of that projected in the air quality management plan and in other planned locations for the project's build-out year The praject is being implemented to address an existing and future elementary school capacity shortfall in the local area. The praject would not generate any new population increases. This 'ts a less than significant impact. Generate vehicle trips that cause a CO hot spot Carbon monoxide hot spots result from congested traffic conditions in areas with stable meteorological canditians, which allow CO to build up in a localized area. As described in the traffic analysis for this project (Section 4.1 b}, the most congested intersection within the project study area is the E Street128f~' Street intersection. According to the traffic analysis, this intersection will experience level of service "F» canditians in the future with or without implementation of this project. 4-4 Wilson !i Elementary Sclraol Draft Environments! Impact Report December, 2D07 To analyze potential CO issues at this location, the project was reviewed using the SCAQMD screening methodology for estimating CO concentrations. Considering the expected LOS F condition that would occur in future years at this intersection (if not signalized}, the expected concentratian of CO at this intersection would be approximately 1.2 ppm. Concentrations of CO have been fairly consistent in the project area during recent years, with one-hour background concentrations of approximately 4.0 ppm. Therefore, the estimated worst case one-hour concentratian would be approximately 5.2 ppm, which is well below state and federal standards. If a persistence factor of 0.8 is applied to this concentration, an 8-hour concentration of 4.2 ppm would be expected. Again, this is well below state and federa! standards. This is a less than significant impact. Have the potential to create or be subjected to an objectionable odor that could impact sensitive receptors. The proposed Schaal would not generate significant objectionable odors that could impact sensitive receptors in the adjacent residential neighborhood. There may be short term odor impacts during construction such as during paving, but this impact is considered short term and less than significant. The new school would not be exposed to any odors generated within the vicinity of the school site. This is a less than significant impact. Have hazardous materials on site and could result in an accidental release of air toxic emissions or acutely hazardous materials posing a threat to public health and safety. As part of Schaal operations, chemicals for maintenance and operation of the facility will be used and stored on site. This could include cleaning chemicals, solvents and fuels. Minor amounts of chemicals may also be transported and used in conjunction with school operations. These materials will be transported, stored and handled in compliance with applicable regulations. This is a less than significant impact. Emit an air toxic contaminant regulated by SG/AQl1A® rules or that is on a federal or state air toxic list. Demolition of the existing residential structures has the potential to release asbestos- containing materials into the air. Based on the age of these structures, asbestos is assumed to be present, though this has not yet been verified. Demolition activities with asbestos present are regulated by the SCAQMD under Rule '[408. Under this regulation, SBCUSD is required to have a qualified contractor survey the structures to be demolished for the presence of asbestos. If asbestos is found, it must be removed from the structures prior to demolition activities. Specific guidelines are identified for removal, handling, and disposal of any asbestos-containing materals. This is a less than significant impact. Na additional mitigation is required. Involve burning of hazardous, medical, or municipal waste as waste-to-energy facilities. The proposed project would not involve any type of waste incinera#ion. No impacts related to waste-ta-energy facilities would result. 4-5 Wilson !i Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 20D7 Be occupied by sensitive receptors within a quarter mile of an existing facility that emits air toxics identified in District Rule 9401 (New Source Review of carcinogenic air contaminants) or near CO hot spots. The project is not Incated within a quarter mile of a facility that emits air toxics. The neighboring areas are developed with residential uses. This is a fens than significant impact. Emit carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants that individually or cumulatively exceed the maximum individual cancer risk of 90 in 9 million. This project does not have the potential to emit carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants because only very small amounts of these substances would be present in this facility. These materials would be handled in accordance with local regulations. The construction activ'~ties may also have a potential to emit diesel emissions. This is addressed under construction emissions under significant impacts. Emission of Greenhouse Gases Implementation of the proposed project will produce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas during the construction and operation of the project. The project type, a neighborhood school is not expected to significantly contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. Since it is a neighborhood school, it will promote walking rather than driving to the school. Furthermore, the project will reduce the requirement of busing to Wilson I ES. 4.2.3 Significant Environmental Impacts Interfere with the attainment of federal or state ambient air quality standards by either violating or contributing to an existing or projected air quality violation. The URBEMIS model was also used to calculate construction emissions associated with this project. This model tends to generate conservative estimates of construction emissions because the model assumes that construction equipment is operating simultaneously during a given phase. Emissions were estimated far three construction phases: demolition, site grading and site construction using specific assumptions for construction equipment to be used, scheduling, etc. Table 4.2-2 provides estimates of the worst case emissions far construction. The quarterly emissions are an extension of the daily worst case condition over athree- month construction period. Table 4.2-2 Estimated Construction Emissions ROC inl{3x CO SO2 ~'M,o ~~z.s Construction rr~issions Pounds per day 7'9.7'fl 89.30 43.94 0.01 48.55 13.64 Tans per quarter 2 38.'` ,~ErB 1.32 0.0003 1.46 - SCAQMD Dail Threshold aunds per da 75 100 550 150 150 55 SCAQMD Quarterly Threshnld 2.5 2.5 24.75 6.75 6.75 - (tnns per quarter) 4-6 Wilson li Elementary Schaa! Draft ~nvironmenfai impact Report f~ecember, 2007 As indicated by the highlighted numbers in the table, during construction, emissions of ROC and NOx would likely exceed SCAQMD's thresholds. For this reason, this is a potentially significant impact. Mitigation measure would reduce this impact to a less- than-significant level. 4.2.4 Mitigation Measures The fallowing mitigation measures are required to reduce emissions during construction activities. MM 4.2-1: Use aqueous diesel fuel far construction equipment. This will reduce the PM~-10 and PM-2.5 emissions. NllVl4.2-2: Use diesel particulate filters on construction equipment. This will also reduce the PM-9a and PM 2.5 emissions MM 4.2-3: Use cooled exhaust gas recirculation on construction vehicles. This will reduce SOx and NOx emissions. MM 4.2-4: Cover all stockpiles with tarps when not in use. This will reduce dust emissions. MM 4.2-5: Water exposed soil surFaces a minimum of two times daily..This will also reduce dust emissions MM 4,2-6: Use a shuttle far transporting construction personnel to and from lunch destinations. This will reduce emissions associates with workers vehicles ~1M 4.2-~: Apply SOLI Stabilizers to inaCtlVe areas. This Wlll redUCe dust emIS510r1S MM 4,2-8: Replace ground cover in disturbed areas. This will reduce dust emissions MM 4.2-9: Reduce speed nn unpaved roads to less than 15 miles per hour. This will reduce dust emissions from vehicles sturing up dust. MIS 4.2-1A When materials are transported aff-site, all material shall be covered, or effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, and at least 6 inches of freeboard space from the tap of the container shall be maintained. Table 4.2-3 shows the estimated air emissions that would result after implementation of the above mitigation. Table 4.2-3 Estimated Constrluction Emissions with implementation of l~litigation Nleasr,~~res ROC NOx CO S02 PFI~3a PM2.~ Pounds per day 72.13 65.32 43.94 0.0'1 3.56 1.09 Tons per quarter 2.'16 1.96 1.32 0.0003 0.71 - SCAQMD Dail _T_hreshofd (~aunds per day 75 10_0 550 150 150 55 SCAQM© Quarterly Threshold 2.5 2.5 24.75 6.75 ~ ~~- 6.76 - {tons per quarter) 4-7 Wilson f! Elementary Schoof Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 As indicated in this table, the mitigation measures will reduce construction-related emissions to a level below the SCAQMD's significance thresholds. 4.2.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no significant unavoidable air quality impacts associated with this project. 4.3 Bi®1®gical Res®urces 4.3.1 Significance Thresholds A biological impact is considered significant if implementation of the project would result in any of the following: A substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species; A substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community; ® A substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands; ® interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; ~ Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, or ® Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Pian (HCP), or Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP). 4.3.2 Less Than Significant Impact A substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community The proposed project is in a we11-established residential area and contains no riparian or any other sensitive habitats. Runoff from the site will enter into the existing storm drain system. Therefore, there will be no significant impact to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. A substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands The project site has no federally protected wetlands and therefore there will be no impact. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species The proposed project site contains non-native species typical of residential areas. Wildlife occurring in the area is typical of those species common to urban areas. The 4-8 Wilson 1! Efemenfary School Draff Environmental Impact Repay! December, 2007 new school will allow these species to occur within the school grounds and an impact to wildlife movement is considered less than significant since the praject site is not considered a migrafiian corridor. Conflicf with any local policies or ordinances profecfing biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance Although the residential area contains mature trees, these trees are primarily of carnman non-native varieties and are not considered heritage trees. Therefore, the impact is considered less than significant. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), or Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP}. The area is not within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan and therefore na impact will occur. 4.3.3 Significant Impact A substantial adverse effect, eifher directly or Through habitaf modifcafions, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species The proposed project site provides little habitat far candidate, sensitive or special status species. No burrowing owls were observed in the vacant lots on the praject site and it would be unlikely that they would be present on the site due to the primary presence of landscaping and substantial presence of people and domestic animals The larger trees could also serve for nesting of migratory bird species.. Grading and clearing of the site will take place during nan-nesting periods. There is a potential that burrowing owls could be present during the construction period. Additionally, the trees in the area could contain nesting birds that could be lost. This is a potentially significant impact. 4.3.4 Mitigation Measures MM 4.3-1 Prinr to site clearing and grading activities will start during the bird breeding season (February 15 to September 1 of each year), apre-construction tree nesting survey shall be conducted within 15 days prior to the initiation of clearing activities. During this survey, a qualified biologist shall inspect all potential nesting sites. If breeding birds and/or active nests are lfound, an avoidance area or construction-free buffer zone of at least 500 feet around the nest of raptors and 150 feet for other nes#ing birds shall be established around the nest and conspicuously flagged afF. The construction crew shall be instructed to avoid any activities in this zone until the bird nest is no longer occupied, per a subsequent survey by the biologist or until after the breeding season.,, 4.3.5 Significant Unavoidable Impacts No significant unavoidable impacts were identified. ~-9 Wilson 11 Elementary Sctraal Draft Environmental lmpact Report December, 2007 4.4 Cut~ural Resources The proposed action would require earthmoving activities, {i.e. excavation, trenching and grading} far the construction of the proposed project. These activities could result in the disturbance of an archeological site ar human remains, if present. 4.4.1 Significance Thresholds An impact to cultural resources is considered significant if it: Causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource; p Causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource; ® Directly or indirectly destroys a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature; or ® Disturbs any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. 4.4.2 Less Than Significant lmpact All cultural resource impacts were considered significant. 4.4.3 Significant Impact Causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource Although it is unlikely that the site would contain surface cultural resources, it is passible that the site could contain subsurface archaeological resources. Disturbance of these resources may constitute a significant impact. Causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource The proposed project will involve the removal of 4q single family homes. A Historic analysis report was prepared far the proposed project to evaluate the significance of these houses This report is contained in Appendix C. CEQA requires evaluation of project impacts on historic resources, including properties "listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources for] included in a local register of historical resources." A resource is eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources if it meets any of the fallowing criteria: . ASSOCIatlon Wlth events that have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. 4 - 1 I~ Wilson it elementary School ©raft Environmental Impact Report December, 2p07 2. Associations with the fives of persons important to local, California ar national history. 3. Embodiment afi the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction; or represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values. 4. Yielding or barring the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory ar history of the local area, California or the nation. The California Register may also include properties fisted in "local registers" of historic properties. A "focal register of historic resources" is broadly defined in §5g2t3.1 (k), as "a list of properties officially designated or recognized as historically significant by a local government pursuant to a lava! ordinance or resolution." Local registers of historic properties come essentially in two farms: {1) surveys of historic resources conducted by a local agency in accordance with Office of Historic Preservation pracedures and standards, adopted by the local agency and maintained as current, and (2) landmarks designated under local ordinances ar resolutions. (Public Resources Cade 5024.1, 21894.1, 15854.5) By definition, the California Register of Historical Resources also includes all "properties farmalfy determined eligible for, or listed in, the National Register of Historic Places,"' and certain specified State Historical Landmarks. The majority of "formal determinations" of NRHP eligibility occur when properties are evaluated by the State Office of Historic Preservation in connection with federal environmental review pracedures {Section 1afi afi the Natianal Historic Preservation Act afi 1966). Formal determinations of eligibility afro occur when properties are nominated to the NRHP, but are not listed due to the absence of owner consent. ,The criteria for determining eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) have been developed by the Natianal Park Service. A property may qualify far NRHP listing if it: 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; 2. Is Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or that represents the work of a master, or that possesses high artistic values, or that represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; ar 4. Has yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in the prehistory or history. According to the National Register of Historic Places guidelines, the "essential physical features" of a property must be present far it to convey its significance. Further, in order to qualify far the NRHP, a resource must retain its integrity, or "the ability of a property to convey its significance." The seven aspects of integrity are: 1. Location (the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred); 4-11 Wilson fl Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2QI17 2. Design {the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property); 3. Setting (the physical environment of a historic property); 4. Materials (the physical elements that were combined ar deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to farm a historic property); 5. Workmanship {the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period of history or prehistory}; 6. Feeling (a property's expression of the atheistic or the historic sense of a particular period of time); and 7. Association (the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property). The relevant aspects of integrity depend upon the Nations! Register criteria applied to a property. For example, a property nominated under Criterion A (events}, would be likely to convey its significance primarily through integrity of location, setting, and association. A property nominated solely under Criterion C (design) would usually rely primarily upon integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. The California Register procedures include similar language with regard to integrity. The minimum age criterion for the National Register of Historic Places {NRHP} and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR} is 50 years- Properties less than 50 years old may be eligible for fisting on the NRHP they can be regarded as "exceptional," as defined by the NRHP procedures,. or in terms of the CRHR, "if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance." (Chapter ~ 1, Title 14, §4842{d} (2}} The neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages remains as a cohesive neighborhood of the style and type. As such, the Bonita Gardens tract appears to meet the Galifornia Register criteria for local significance as a historic district, with a period of significance from 192--1941. As such, each dwelling constructed during this period was assessed far its historical integrity, and the dwellings determined to have experienced significant Toss, were removed from inclusion. In summary, a tots! of 29 homes were determined to be contributors to this potential local historic district. CEQA requires evaluation of project impacts on historic resources, including properties "listed in, ar determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (ar] included in a local register of historical resources." In accordance with Section '15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, "a project, which causes s substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource, is a project that may have a . significant effect on the environment." Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource is defined as the destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or of the immediate surroundings, such that the significance of an historic resource would be materially impaired. Thus, consideration must be made of potential historic properties in project planning. Avoidance of these resources is the preferred alternative- 4-12 Wilson !1 Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, ,2007 Implementation of the proposed project would result in the demolition of the 29 homes contributing fio a potential local historic district. This impact would be considered significant and potentially unavoidable. Directly or indirectly destroys a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature There is a remote potential that grading could disturb paleontological resources within the alluvium that under lays the site. This is a potentially significant impact. Disturbs any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries There is a remote potential that the site could contain buried human remains. The disturbance of these remains would be considered a significant environmental impact. 4.4.4 Mitigation Measures Ml~ 4.5-'l: The initial site grading will be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. In the event that subsurface archaeological sites or burials are encountered work will cease in the vicinity of the discovery. The site will be evaluated by the archaeologist and further testing and data recovery will be conducted if necessary. IVIM 4.5-2: In the event that potential paleanfialagical resources are encountered during grading, the work in the area shalt cease until the resource is evaluated. if required, the resources will be salvaged prior to continuation of grading. NIIVII 4.23 Prior to the implementation of the proposed project, a detailed analysis of each of the 29 structures will be conducted to dacumenfi the architectural features of the site and any additional historic context_ This will include exterior and interior features. M11A 4.2-4 The SBCUSD wi11 make the homes available to individuals ar groups far relocation of all or some of the homes to an alternaive site or sites to make a historic district. It is not known whether this mitigation measure is feasible due to the economics of the program and additional permitting requirements of a new site.. For purposes of this EIR, the impact is considered significant and unavoidable 4.4.5 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts Unless the homes can be relocated to form a new historic district, the impact is considered significant and unavoidable even with the documentation of the structures under mitigation measure 4.2-3. 4-13 W!lson !1 Elementary Scharr! Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 ~.5 ~e®®gy and S®I~S 4.5.1 Significance Thresholds The significance of the proposed project impacts were evaluated #aased on the following criteria: E~cpose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including o Rupture of a known earthquake fault as defined by the most recent State of California Earthquake Fault _ Rupture Hazard Zone IVlap {formerly known as the Alquist~-Priolo Earthquake Faulting Zone Act} o Strong seismic ground shaking © Seismic related ground failure including liquefaction © Land slides Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of top soil • Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project- and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence liquefaction or collapse g Be located on eupansive soil, as defned in the California Building Code (CBC, 2f101), creating substantial risks to life or property Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. 4.5.2 Less Than Significant Impacts Rupture of a known earthquake fault as defined by the most recent State of California Earthquake Fault ~- Rupture Hazard Zone ltllap The proposed project site is not located in a State of California earthquake fault rupture hazard zone (preciously known as Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone), nor are any faults known #o project through or towards the site based on current geological information. Therefore, no significant impacts associated with fault rupture are expected. Liquefaction Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon where saturated, granular soils experience a substantial loss of strength and deforms#ion due to increased pore pressure as a result of increased, cyclic shear stress caused by earthquakes. Liquefaction requires the coexistence of suscep#ible sails, strong ground motions and shallow ground water. The ground water found on the site is 51.5 feet from the existing ground level and is not shallow enough to be considered susceptible to liquefaction. Therefore, na significant impacts involving liquefaction impact are anticipated. ~-~~ Wilson !f Elemenfary School Draff Envirnnmenfai lmpacf Report December, 2007 Lateral Spreading Seismically induced lateral spreading involves the sideways movement of earth ma#erials, especially soils subject to liquefac#ion, due to seismic activity. Since the topography of the proposed site and adjacent areas are relatively flat, potential impacts from lateral spreading or landslides would not occur. Therefore, this impac# is considered less than significant. Ground dater Ground water was not encountered in any of the borings up to a depth of 51.5 feet below ground surface. Historically, groundwater a# the same well was found at a depth of 210 feet below ground surface in April 1999. It should be noted that ground water levels could ,vary based an ground wafer pumping activities and precipitation. Impacts due shallow ground water are considered less than significant. Landslides Landslides and other slope failures are common occurrences during or soon after earthquakes. Since the topography of the proposed site and adjacent areas are relatively flat, the impact associated with landslide is less than significant. Earthquake Induced Flooding This type of flooding occurs when seismic events cause dams or other water retaining structures to rupture. The impact of earthquake induced flooding is considered less than significant because the site is not within a designated inundation gone as indicated in the City of San Bernardino 2005 General Pian Update. Tsunamis and Seiches Tsunamis are oceanic waves that are created by earthquakes, submarine volcanic erup#ions or large submarine landslides. Belches are large waves that are created in enclosed bodies of water as a result of ground shaking. Based on the location of the site, tsunamis and seiches do not pose a significant impact. Have soils incapable; of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative; wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater. The proposed project site will be served by a city sewer system. 4.5.3 Significant Impacts Seismic Ground Shaking The proposed project site is located relatively near to large active faults, as described in Section 3.5.2. Earthquakes generated along these faults are likely to generate strong ground shaking which may have a significant impact on #his project. ~-~~ Wilson Elemenfary Schaal Draff Enviranrnenfa! lmpacf Report December, 2007 Expansive Soils Expansive soils are characterized by their ability fio undergo significant volume change (shrink or swell) due to variations in moisture content. Changes in soil moisture content may cause unacceptable settlement or heave of structures, concrete slabs supported- on-grade, or pavements supported on these materials. The on-site soils are fine- grained and have "Very Low" expansion potential based on expansion index texts, although soils will become mixed during grading ar the imported soils may be expansive in nature. There is however, a potentially significant impact associated with expansive sails fihat will require rnitigatian. Soil Co~rosivity The chloride content of the soil was 30 ppm and the pN was 8.6. Soils from the site are considered "Moderately Corrosive" to ferrous metals in. sail. Thin is a pafienfially significant, impact. Low Quality Su~ace Soils Fill and alluvial deposits were encountered at the project site up to the maximum depth of 51.5 feet. Between 2-3 feet of fill consisting of silty sand was encountered in borings taken from driveways and front yards of existing residences. The upper 5 feet of soli had unsatisfactory relative compaction and is considered unsuitable for support of any structure or additions[ fill. 4.5.4 ll/lifiigatian Measures MM 4.5.'l: Structures shall be designed in conformance with the 2Q01 California Building Cade, Seismic Zone 4. This design should be sufficient to prevent significant damage from ground shaking during seismic events and reduce impacts fio less than significant levels. MM 4.5-2; The imported soils will be substantially mixed during grading and the actual expansion potential should be verified at the completion of grading. The CBC (2Q01 } recommends design cansiderafiians for slabs for lots with an expansion index great than 2g, per CBC Section 1803A.2. This will reduce any impacts associated with expansive soils or other soils conditions. MM 4.5M3: A corrosion engineer shall be contacted for corrosion mitigation procedures. This will reduce the potential for corrosive sails impacting structures. Conventional corrosion mitigation measures may include the fallowing: ® All steel and wire concrete reinforcement shall be covered by at least three {3) inches of concrete where cast against sail, unformed. ® As a minimum, below grade ferrous metals shall be given a high quality protective coating such as 18-mil plastic tape, coal-tar enamel, Portland cement mortar, or extruded polyethylene. Below-grade metals shall be electrically isolated or insulated from above-grade metals by dielectric fittings in ferrous utilities andlor exposed metal structures breaking grade. 4-1E Wilsan fl Elementary Schaa! Draft 'nvlranmenfal lmpacf Report December, 2f107 N11V114.5-4: At least five (5) feet ofi existing soils are not considered suitable for supporting structures or additional fill, and must be removed or recompacted_ All laosa, disturbed or soft earth must be removed from the bottoms of excavations prior to addition of structural fill. 4.5.5 Significant Unavoidable Environmental Impacts No significant unavoidable environmental impacts have been identified..The mitigation measures will result in reducing the. potential impacts to less than significant levels. 4.6 Hlazards and Hazard®us i'~aterials This section describes the potential environmental impacts on this project related to hazards and hazardous materials and waste. A description is provided of the criteria used #o determine the level of significance for potential impacts. Mitigation measures are described for any impacts that are considered to be significant. Lastly, any significant impacts that cannot be mitigated #o a less than signifiicant level will be described. 4.6_'I Significance Thresholds The proposed project would have a signifiicant impact on the environment if the project will: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school o Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment W For a project located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard far people residing or working in the project area For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area a impair implementation of, or physically interFere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands 4-~7 Wilson !1 Elementary Schoo! Dra~f Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 4.6.2 Less Than Significant Impacts Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials. As part of school operations, chemicals for maintenance and operation of the facility will be used and stored on site. These materials will be transported, stored and handled in compliance with applicable regulations. This is a less than significant impact. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Lead-Based Paint Demolition of the existing residential structures on the project site has the potential to generate ACM and LBP that likely occur in these structures or, in the case of LBP, may have caused lead to be deposited in soils near the structures. DISC provides specific guidance for evaluating potential impacts to human health or the environment. CCR Title 22, Chapter 51.5, Section 69105, Sampling for Lead in Soil from Lead Based Paint, requires that prior to demolition of buildings or removal of foundations or slabs, or movement of soils on the proposed school site, pre-demolition sampling for lead in soil from LBP shall be implemented. DTSC's Interim Guidance for Evaluating Lead Based Paint and As6esfos~Confaining Materials at Proposed Schoo! Sites (July 23, 2001) recommends that surface soil samples be collected around the perimeter of painted structures, adjacent to areas with the highest likelihood of lead deposits. Soil and/or materials containing LBP must be handled and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. This is a less than significant impact. Asbestos-Containing Materials As summarized in DTSC's guidance, there are multiple statutes and regulations for ACM. Mitigation and management activities for ACM must be performed in accordance with established statutes and regulations (California Division of Occupational Safety and Health regulations in GCR Title 8 and South Coast Air Quality Management District regulations). Prior to demolition of structures, SBCUSD will retain a Certified Asbestos Consultant to conduct an asbestos survey. All ACM will be handled and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. This is a less than significant impact. Groundwater Contamination The Newmark Plume will not affect the project site because the contamination is well below the ground surface and would not be encounfiered during ground-disturbing activities associated with construction. Water supply is provided to the site by the City of San Bernardino. No wells would be constructed as park of this project. This impact is less than significant. 4-'f8 Wilson f! Efemenfary School Draft Environmentaf lmpacf Deport December, 20Q7 Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances nr waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. The proposed project is a school site and would not emit or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or wastes. This will not impact the adjacent intermediate school. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §G5962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The proposed project site is not included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. No impact will occur. For a project located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. The proposed project is not within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport. No impac# will occur. For a project within the vicinity cal a primate airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. The proposed project site is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impact will occur. Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The proposed project would not interfere with an adopted emergency plan ar evacuation plan. Emergency response services are provided to the site by the City of San Bernardino. After the school is constructed, minor changes to the neighborhood street system would occur when two public streets extending through the site are abandoned. However, this change would be minor and is not expected to have an adverse impact on emergency response times in the area. This is a less than significan# impact because these are short and not through streets. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involming wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands, The project site is located on level ground outside of the City of San Bernardino's fire hazard areas, which are associated with the foothill and mountain terrain within the city. Impacts related to wildland fires are considered less than significant. 4-19 Wilson !I Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 4.6.3 Significant Environmental Impacts There are no significant impacts associated with hazards anti hazardous materials. 4.6.4 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required 4.6.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are na significant and unavoidable impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials. 4.? Hydral®gy and V61a~er Quality 4.7.1 Significance Thresholds The project would have a significant impact on hydrology and water quaiity if the project would: Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements; s Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net defrcit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level ~e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses for which permits have been granted); Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the through the alteration of the course of a stream or river in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site. Substantially alter existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in flooding on or off-site; Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial addition sources of polluted runoff; ® otherwise substantially degrade water quality; Place housing within a 1Q0-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate flap or other flood hazard delineation map; ® Place within a 'lOD-year flood hazard area, structures that would impede or redirect flood flows; Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury ar death involving flooding, as a result of the failure of a levee or dam; or Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. 4-2Q Wilson !1 Elementary Schaa! Draft Enviranmentai Impact Report ©ecember, 2007 4.72 Less Than Significant Impacts Viiolate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The U.S. EPA has set forth national water quality standards. In accordance with Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. EPA has also created regulations under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control direct storm water discharges. In California NPDES the State Water Quality Control Board (SWCQB) controls permitting programs and has authority over waste discharge requirements. The proposed project would be implemented in accordance with all necessary waste discharge and water quality regulations, which would ensure that the quantity and quality of surface water flowing from the surface of the proposed site would not be violated. In addition, the proposed project doesn't involve any paint source discharge and will not discharge any hazardous materials into surface or subsurface waters. The impact the proposed site will have an water quality and waste discharge is considered less than significant. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundrrvater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. The San Bernardino Municipal Water District provides current water services to the proposed site. The San Bernardino Municipal Water District's primary source of water is ground water taken from the Bunker I--Iill Groundwater Basin, Santa Ana River snow melt, and springs originating from the San Bernardino Mountains. The State Water Project supplies supplemental water as needed. The proposed project would not directly withdraw ground water and affect groundwater supplies. In addition, the project would not increase the impermeable surface area, due to the construction of buildings and parking lots, compared to the current residential development. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to impact aquifer volume, the groundwater table level or interfere with groundwater recharge. This impact is considered less than significant. Substantially alter the existing discharge pattern of the site or area, including the through the alteration off the course of a stream or river in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site The proposed site is currently a residential neighborhood with a slight southwestern gradient. Na streams, rivers, or enclosed bodies of water are an or adjacent to the proposed site, nor does the site cross a perennial ar intermittent stream Substantially alter existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course ot" a stream or river, in a manner that would result in flooding on or off-site. The proposed site is currently a residential neighborhood with a slight southwestern gradient. No streams, rivers, ar enclosed bodies of water are an ar adjacent to the proposed site, nor does the site cross a perennial or intermittent stream. Therefore, grading, cut..and-fill, and excavation far the proposed site would not affect drainage patterns and flood protection strategies. Historically, sheet flow to a curb and gutter system, drains urban and storm water from the proposed project site. The proposed ~-z~ Wilson f! Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 project would not increase impermeable surface area causing an increase in surface runoff. The proposed project will not significanfily impact existing drainage or result in on of off-site flooding. Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial addition sources of polluted runoff Historically, sheet flow to a curb and gutter system drains urban and storm water from the proposed project site. Regional flood control channels leading to the Santa Ana River are used to direct runoff from within the City of San Bernardino. Increased sources of polluted runoff during wet weather conditions, including; trash, debris, rubber, grease, oil and other automotive products leaked an to paved parking surfaces, are not anticipated by the prapased project, and any prospective amount would be less than during the current residential build out. The proposed project would not increase impermeable surface area causing an increase in surface runoff. The proposed project would not exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems and this impact is considered less than significant. Place housing within a 1{~0-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood IHlazard Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. The proposed site is not located within a 100-year flood plain as mapped an Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate maps. In addition no housing will be placed with in the project. Na impact will occur. Place within a 1Q®-year flood hazard area, structures that would impede or redirect flood flows. The proposed site is not located within a 100-year or 500-year flood plain as mapped on Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood insurance Rate maps, therefore no impact wilt occur to the placement of structures. l=xpose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. The proposed project site is not located within the 100-year and 500-year flood hazard boundary. Therefore no impact to people from normal flooding is anticipated. The site is also not located within an inundation area in the event of a dam failure as indicated on the City of San Bernardino 2005 General Plan l.~pdate. Inundation by tsunami, seiche, or mudflow. The proposed project site is located in an area that could experience severe seismic shaking. The prapased project site is not located in a coastal area; therefore there is no potential for tsunami. The proposed project site is not located near a large enclosed body of water; therefore there is no potential far seiche. Because the site is generally flat surrounded by urban development and has na nearby hillsides, the site would not be prone to mudslides. This impact is considered less than significant. 4 - 22 Wilson f1 ~ler»entary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 4.7.3 Significant Environmental Impacts ®therwise substantially degrade water quality. Implementation of the proposed project has the potential to significantly degrade water quality during the construction and the operation of the project. Construction of the proposed school will create the potential for sedimentation and accidental release of fuels, fluids, solvents and other materials from the site. This impact is considered a significant impact. The proposed project has the potential to discharge pollutants associated with urban runoff from the school site. The pollutants will include sediments, trash, pesticides and fertilizers, virus and bacteria and oil and grease. Although the formal residential development released similar pollutants, this impact is considered significant. 4.7.4 Mitigation Measures MM 4.7-1: A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan {SWPPP} shall be prepared that will identify Besfi Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce impacts during construction. These BMPs will include methods to reduce sedimentation from the site as well as to prevent spills and provide methods for spill clean. up of materials associated with the construction operation. fltfM 4.7-2: A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP} shall be prepared far the proposed project. The WQMP shall identify both structural and non-structural BMPs to reduce the extent of pollutants. These measures may include trash control, restrictions on fertilizer use, and use of catch basins with fossil filters. 4.7.E Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There are no adverse significant unavoidable water quality impacts. The implementation of fihe plans to canfirol pollutants during construction and operation of the project will reduce significant water quality impacts. 4.8 Land Use and Planning 4.8.'1 Significance Thresholds The project would have a significant impact on land use and planning if the project: Physically divides an established community 4 Conflicts with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect Gonfl"act with any applicable habitat conversation plan or natural community conservation plan 4-23 Wilson Elementary School Draft Environments! Impact Report December, 2007 4.8.2 Less Than Significant impacts The proposed project physically dividds an established community The proposed project site is a residential neighborhood consisting of 40 homes. The site is zoned RS-1, single family residential with a density of 4.5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed site is surrounded by a large neighborhaad of residential units that have formed a neighborhood for over 50 years. The proposed project will eliminate the 40 homes from the area, but will retain the remainder of the homes in the area. The proposed school will became part of the neighborhood and add to the character of the community. The school will provide the residents of the community a focal education facility: It will not divide the area as would a freeway or similar praject. Conflict with any applicable habitat conversation plan or natural community conservation plan The proposed project site is not located within a habitat conservation plan area ar a natural community conservation plan area, therefore no impact will occur. 4.8.3 Significant Impacts Conflicts with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specifwc plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect The proposed site and areas immediately surrounding it are zoned RS-1, single family residential with a density of 4.5 dwelling units per acre. This zoning ailnws development of single family homes with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. Public Schools are an allowable use under this zoning. The City of San Bernardino General Plan allows for publiclinstitutional uses such as schools, parks, and child care centers if determined to be "compatible and oriented towards the needs of residential neighborhoods within residential areas." The proposed School meets the requirements outlined in the General Plan far placement of a school in a residential zone .The General Plan contains goals, policies and objectives to direct placement of future school sites. These objectives are addressed below: General Plan ®bjective 9.37 states: "It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to provide far the continuation of existing and development of new parks, schools, government administrative, police, fire social service, and other public. facilities and open spaces in proximity to and compatible with residential uses." The General Plan also has policies that stress the compatibility of the praject with surrounding land uses and the preservation of existing stable, cohesive neighborhoods. On August 1, 2005, the Mayor and Common Council determined that development of Wilson 11 Elementary School at the site currently proposed is not consistent with the City's General Plan. Their findings included: 4 - 24 Wilson 11 Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 "...the specific site proposed by the District for development of Wilson II is located in a very stable, well maintained and cohesive neighborhood. Demolition of 40 existing homes and vacation of a segment of 25t~ Street as proposed would impact the existing neighborhood adversely." General Plato ®bjective 1.6 states: "It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to control the development of land uses which may adversely impact the character of the City and quality of life of its residents." The Mayor and Common Council also determined that: "The site proposed for development of Wilson II Elementary School is part of a fully developed, stable and cohesive neighborhood, evidenced by the high level of owner occupancy. It is a fine example of a 70-year old neighborhood that has stood the test of time and continues to thrive. Intrusion into this neighborhood and the demolition of 40 homes would also eliminate numerous examples of Tudor Revival and California Bungalow architecture that currently enhance the character of the community." The General Plan lists the proposed project site as an Urban Conservation and Enhancement Area, and the General Plan focuses an "presentation and enhancement of existing neighborhoods and where fundamental changes in the land use pattern are not anticipated ar desired." The proposed project would not be consistent in this portion of the general plan and would cause a significant impact. Based on this finding by the City of San Bernardino, the proposed project in the City's opinion is not consistent with their General Plan and is therefore a significant impac#. Government Cade section 53094 allows a school district by atwo-thirds vote to render the City's land use and zoning ordinance inapplicable to classroom facilities except when the proposed use of the property by the school district is for non-classroom faculties. Recent court rulings have found that facilities such as athletic fields were a classroom facility. The San Bernardino Unified School District would proceed with facility construction with the current zoning and land use designations with a 213 vote of the school board. The San Bernardino Unified School District must follow the requirement of Public Resource Code Section 2115'1.2 CEQA through provision of notice in writing to the San Bernardino City Planning Department of the proposed site acquisition. The Planning Department shall investigate the site and within 3g days after receipt of the notice submit to the school board a written report of the investigation and its recommendations concerning acquisition of the site. The school board shall not acquire title to the site until the report of the Planning Department commission has been received. If the report does not favor the acquisition of the property for a school site, the school board shall not acquire title to the property anti! 30 days after the commission's report is received. 4.8.4 Mitigation Measures ether than adoption of an alternative site or implementation of the no project alternative, no feasible mitigation measures have been identified. 4 - 25 Wilson !l Elementary Schap! Draft Enviranmenta! Impact Report December, 20Q7 4.8.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Conflicts with an applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or coning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect Based on the City of San Bernardino's resolution on the propose project„ "The site proposed for development of 11Vilsan II Elementary School is part of a fully developed, stable and cohesive neighbarhaod, evidenced by the high level of owner occupancy. It is a fine example of a 7D-year ofd neighborhoad that has staod the test of time and continues to thrive. Intrusion into this neighborhood and the demolition of 40 homes would also eliminate numerous examples of Tudor Revival and California Bungalow architecture that currently enhance the character of the community.,' The General Plan lists the proposed project site as an Urban Conservation and Enhancement Area, and the General Plan focuses an "preservation and enhancement of existing neighborhoods and where fundamental changes in the land use pattern are not anticipated ar desired." The proposed project would not be consistent this portion of the general plan and would cause a significant impact between the San Bernardina City Unified School District proposal and the City of San Bernardina. This impact is considered significant and unavoidable. 4.~ 1V~ineral Resources 4.9.1 Significance Thresholds The project would have a significant impact on mineral resources if the project would: ® Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. ® Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral reso~rrce recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or ether land use plan. 4.9.2 Less Than Significant Impact Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. Although the site could contain sand and gravel resaurces of same commercial value, due to the location and land uses of the site, the impact of the proposed project fn mineral resources is considered less than significant- Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. The proposed project site is oat within an area designated as a locally important mineral resource recovery site and therefore no impact will occur. ~-26 Wilson Elementary Schoa! Draft nvrronmenta! Impact Report December, 2007 4.9.3 Significant Impacts No significant impacts have been identified. 4.9.4 Mitigation Measures Because no significan# impacts have been identified, no mitigation measures are required. 4.9.E Significant Unavoidable Impacts No significant unavoidable impacts have been identified. A noise analysis was prepared far this project to assess the potential noise and vibration impacts associated with implementation of this project (URS 2005a}. This analysis has been used in part to prepare this section. 4.10.1 Significance Thresholds Noise impact would be considered significant if implementation of the proposed project would result in any of the following based on the City of San Bernardin© noise element: Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of applicable noise standards (Table 3.1 a-1 Specifically, exterior noise levels in excess of ~5 dBA Ld„IGIVEL at existing residential land uses; m A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above Levels existing without the project; A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicirity above levels existing without the project; ® Expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where shcu as plan has not been adopted within to miles of a public airport or a public use airport would the proposed project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels ® For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip would the proposed project expose people residing in the project area to excessive noise levels. For purposes of this analysis, noticeable increases in ambient noise levels (i.e., 3 dBA or greater) where noise levels already exceed 65dB(A} would be considered #o have a potentially significant impact because this is the noise increase that is normally 4-27 Wilson II elementary School Draft Envrronmenta! Impact Report December, 2D07 perceptible to the human ear. This is not part of the City's Noise ordinance, but is generally accepted by acoustic analysis. 4.1 p.2 Less Than Significant Impacts Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of applicable noise standards. ®"~-Sike Traffic Noise A traffic study was completed far this project that evaluated the effects of the new school an local traffic patterns. This study estimated changes in traffic volumes that would result from implementation of the project. The changes in traffic volumes on the local roadway network were reviewed to determine whether increases in traffic attributable to the project would result in increased noise levels. Using a screening methodology used by the California Department of Transportation, existing and future traffic volumes were compared, assuming roadway geametrics will not substantially change {California Department of Transportation 1998). The minor increases in traffic are not sufficient to cause a 3 dBA ar greater change in noise levels an properties along any of the roadways within the project area. Three dBA is considered to be the threshold for the average person to perceive changes in noise. Therefore, this impact is considered less than significant. Student Drop-Off Area Noise There are two areas on the project site where students will be dropped off and picked up. A bus area is located on the north side of the project site; however, the SBCUSD anticipates that only two buses will be used. This analysis assumes this area is used for bus drop-off and pick-up and by half of the cars dropping off students (assumed to be 100 at this drop-off point). The FTA provides a methodology for evaluating noise associated with a transit center and noise from this area was evaluated using this methodology {U.S. Department of Transportation 2Ut}6). The estimated noise level is expected to be approximately 56.7 dB t_~q at a point 50 feet away. This is well within established noise standards. The other area is a parking lot on the west side of the project site. This -area was also analyzed using the same FTA methodology. Far this drop-off area, the noise level was estimated to be 52.4 L~q, which is also below established noise standards. Mechanical Equipment Noise Noise from mechanical equipment, such as motors, pumps, and fans will produce a .noise level of 80 dBA at a distance of three feet from the equipment. Assuming no acoustic shielding is present, a sound attenuation rate of about 6 dBA per doubling of distance from the source would result. Therefore, the estimated exterior raise levels in the rear yards of adjacent residences generated by this equipment would be less than 46 dBA. This is a less than significant impact. Recreational Activity Noise Noise from recreational activities in the playground area has the potential to expose adjacent residential properties to noise levels that exceed the City's standards. This 4-28 Wifson Elerrrenfary Schgo! Draft Envirpnmenta! fmpact Reppr# Decamber, 2407 area would include a hardcourt and turf playfield that would be used far typical playground sports and play activities. However, activities occurring on public and private Schaal rounds are considered exempt under the noise standards contained in fihe City's Development Cade; thus na further analysis is required. This is a less than significant impact A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. The day to day operation of the proposed elementary school wii! not substantially increase ambient noise levels in the project vicinity_ Although same aspects of the project will generate noise, as described above, the project will not include new sources of noise that would exceed land use compatibility guidelines for this neighborhood. This is a less than significant impact. Expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. An analysis of potential ground vibration impacts was conducted far this project as part of the noise analysis (URS 2005x). Using the 1=ederal Transit Authority (FTA} methodology (U.S. Department of Transpartatian 2000, the worst-case vibration level is expected to be 0.03 inches per second, assuming construction activities would occur at least 50 from the neighboring residential properties. The 1=TA's most stringent category for structural vibration sensitivity ("extremely fragile historic buildings"} is 0.12 inches per second. Therefore, vibration from construction activity is expected to be barely perceptible. This is a less than significant impact. Aircraft Noise The proposed project is not -near an aircraft flight path or has the potential to be subjected to any substantial aircraft noise. Therefore, the impact is not considered significant 4.10.3 Significant Environmental Impacts Exposure of persons t® or generation of noise levels in excess of applicable noise standards. A. substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; Construction Noise The 1=TA's methodology was used far estimating construction associated with this project (U.S. Department of Transpartatian 2006). Noise associated with construction activities such as demolition, site grading, and building constructed is typically variable in magnitude depending on the construction equipment in use at a given time and the location of active work within the project site. To estimate construction noise, reference ,noise levels for two items of equipment, a loader/dozer and a truck} were used. The equipment was assumed to operate at the 4-29 Wilson !I Elementary Schoo! CJraft Fnvironmentai impact Report ©ecember, 2007 same time and continuously during none-hour period. Worst-case noise levels were calculated at a point 200 feet from the equipment work area, which is the approximate distance to sensitive noise receptors next to the site. At 200 feet, a noise level of approximately 77.8 dBA L~q could potentially occur for a short period of time primarily during grading activities. This is a potentially significant short-term noise impact. Implementation of mitigation measures listed in Section 4.10.4 below is expected to reduce this impact to ales-than-significant level through lessening the intensity of noise and reducing the duration of this noise. 4.10.4 Mitigation Measures IVIM 4.70-1: No construction shall take place on Sundays or legal holidays or between the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. an other days. IVIM 4.70-2: All construction equipment shall have sound-control devices. No equipment shall have unmuffled exhaust. This shall be substantiated by the SBCUSD construction inspector. MM 4.10-3: Electrically-powered equipment shall be used where feasible instead of pneumatic equipment or equipment powered by internal combustion engines. IUIi1114.10-4: Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and maintenance areas shall be located as far as practical from noise-sensitive receptors. IVIM 4.10-5: Contact information for the onsite construction supervisor shall be prominently posted at the construction site fio provide adjacent residents with a point of contact for voicing complaints about noise. 4.10.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Construction noise even with incorporation of mitigation measures may exceed 60dBA and could remain significant and unavoidable on a short term basis during the construction period. 4.11 P®puda~i®n and Flousing 4.11.1 Significance Thresholds The significance of the project impacts were based on the following thresholds of 5lgnlficance: Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ~-30 Wilson Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 4.11.2 Less Than Significant Impacts Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and business} or indirectly alter example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure The proposed project has a law potential to induce growth either directly through new homes and/or businesses ar indirectly through the extension of roads or other infrastructure. The new elementary school is intended to provide facilities to meet an existing need and Js not expected to induce substantial population growth. Displace substant"ral numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Implementation of the proposed project will result in the loss of 40 existing housing units. The overall project involves the implementation of a relocation plan. It is anticipated that given the current market that the homes can be replaced in the existing housing stock without construction of new homes. Displace substantial numbers of people necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Implementation of the proposed project will require the loss of 40 homes that hawse from 200 to 250 residents. It is anticipated that these homes can be replaced though the existing housing stock. 4.11.3 Significant Impacts No significant impacts have been identified. 4.11.4 Mitigation Measures No Mitigation is required. 4.11.5 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts There are no significant unavoidable impacts identified. 4,12 Public Services 4.12.'1 Significance Thresholds The project would have a significant impact on public services if the project would result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provrs~on of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new ar physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: 4..3'1 Wilsnn !1 Elementary School E?raft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 ® Fire protection ® Police protection Schools Parks ® Other public facilities 4.'[2.2 f_ess Than Significant Impacts Fire Protection Implementation of this praject would convert the use of the project site from 40 developed residential properties to an elementary schaal at the same location. There would be no change in demand far fire protection services far the site. Response times would remain unchanged from current conditions. The proposed abandonment of portions of two minor residential streets would slightly alter access through the neighborhood, but this would be a very minor change in traffc circulation. Impacts involving fire pratectian services would be less than significant. Police Protection The conversion of the project site to an elementary schaal would have less than significant impacts an police pratectian services in this area because of the relatively small size of the praject. Contact with the San Bernardino Police Department has determined that elementary schools usually da not create major increases in police protection services. Additionally, the SBCUSD provides security with its own police farce that would reduce any additional need far police pratectian. No significant impacts to police response times are anticipated. Impacts involving police pratectian services would be less than significant. Schools The proposed praject would be implemented to address an existing shortfall in providing kindergarten through ern grade school facilities within this part of the SBCUSD's service area. This project waufd not induce any additional demand for schools. This is a less than significant impact. Parks Implementation of this project would not cause any increase in population that waufd generate additional demand far parks beyond existing levels. By creating a }Mayfield and hard court area, the praject will contribute to the availability of recreational areas in this neighborhood. Impacts to parks are less than significant. Other Public Services Implementation of the prapased project waufd not impact any other public services beyond thane already described above. The project would not induce any increases in population that would generate new demand far pubfic services. ~-32 Wilson 1! Elementary Schaal Drat Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 4.12.3 Significant Environmental Impacts There would be nn significant impacts to public services. 4.'12.4 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 4.12.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There would be nn significant and unavoidable impacts to public services. 4.13 Public Utilities 4.13.1 Significance Thresholds To determine the project would have a significant impact an ,public utilities, consideration was given as to whether the project would: Exceed wastewa#er treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? m Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 4 Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause siignif<cant environmental effects ® Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand, in addition to the provider's existing commitments ® Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal need ® Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste 4.13.2 Less Than Significant Impacts Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regiona! Water Quality Control Board? Implementation of this project would oat generate wastewater t'laws that would exceed any of the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The volume and 4-33 Wilson f! Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2(}07 duality of wastewater would be comparable to existing flows to wastewater treatment facilities currently serving the project area. This is a less than significant impact. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treafimenfi faciliifiies or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental efFecfis'? Using sewage generation rates for the existing and proposed uses for the project site {City of Los Angeles 2008}, a comparison can be made of wastewater flows under each scenario. The existing residences generate approximately 8,400 gallons per day of wastewater. The proposed elementary school would generate approximately 7,200 gallons per day of wastewater. Because the quantity of wastewater would be less than existing uses, this is a less than significant impact. No new wastewater treatment facilities or expanded facilities would be required. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause sign`rfican# environmental effects The quantity of storm drainage from the elementary school site would be comparable to the drainage from the existing residential uses. New drainage facilities will be constructed to address internal drainage on the school site and connection with the existing storm drainage system. However, this drainage work would be relatively minor in magnitude. This is a less than significant impact. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing enfrtlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed In Southern California, an acre-foot of water {325,829 gallons) is the approximate amount of water needed to support twa families. Applying this water demand rate for the 40 residences on the project site, an estimated 17,900 gallons per day is needed to support these residences. Using a water demand rate of eight gallons per student per day (Los Angeles Unified School District 2004}, the new elementary school would have an estimated water demand of 7,200 gallons per day, which is considerably less. Existing water supplies and facilities are sufficient to serve the proposed project. This is a less than significant impact. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serge the project's projected demand, in addition fio the pravider's existing commitments As described previously, the proposed project would likely generate a lower volume of wastewater compared to the existing land uses on the project site. For this reason, the City`s wastewater collection and treatment system would have adequate capacity to serve the proposed project without affecting other commitments. 4-34 Wilson 11 'Iementary Schoo! Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal need. Under existing conditions, solid waste is generated by the 40 residences within the project site. Using a residential solid waste generation rate of 12.23 pounds per household per day (City of Los Angeles 2006), the existing residential uses would generate approximately 490 pounds per day of solid waste, assuming no waste diversion. Far schools, estimated waste generation rates generally vary between 0.5 to 1.0 pounds per student per day {CIWMB 2007). This means that the new school would generate solid waste at a rate of between 4~0 to 900 pounds per day. The project site Is currently seNed by county~operated landfills including Mid Valley Landfill in Rialto and the San Timoteo Landfill in Redlands that have permitted capacity far handling .solid waste. The new school may generate slightly mare solid waste compared to the residences; but this would be a very small incremental contribution to the existing waste stream handfed by these facilities. The SBCUSD will recycle materials where feasible including recycling of green waste in conformance with city standards. This is a less than significant impact. Solid waste generated by demolition and other construction activities will be also diseased of in County landfills. This material wilt be recycled where feasible. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste The SBCUSD will comply with all statutes and regulations associated with solid waste. 4.13.3 Significant Environmental Impacts No significant impacts involving public utilities would result from construction -and operation of this project. 4.13.4 Mitigation Measures Na mitigation measures are required. 4.13.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No significant and unavoidable adverse impacts involving public utilities would result from this project. 4-35 Wilson Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Roport December, 2007 4.14.'! Significance Thresholds Recreation impacts would be considered significant if implementation of the proposed project would result in any of the following: eon increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. a The project would include recreational facilities, or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. 4.'14.2 Less Than Significant Impacts .A.n increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational fac"rlities such that substantial physical deterioration v# the facility would occur or be accelerated The proposed elementary school would not generate any increase in usage for recreational facilities in the adjoining neighborhood or the city as a whole. Students that come to this school will come from families that already live within the schools boundaries. This is a less than significant impact. The project would include recreational facilities, or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Tfie site plan for this project includes a recreational play area with a hard court and turf area. As described in Section 4.10, "Noise", this play area is located directly across the street from single family residences that would be impacted by noise associated with recreational activities at the school. These residences could potentially be impacted by noise levels. This noise is specifically exempted by the City's Development Code and therefore these impacts would lie at less than significanfi levels. 4.14.3 Significant Environmental Impacts No Significant Impacts have been identified. 4.14.4 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 4.'14.5 Significant Unavoidable Impacts There would be no significant and unavoidable recreation impacts. 4-36 Wilson ff 'fementary Schoof Draff Environmental impact Report December, 207 4.15 Tra~f~c and 1"ransp®rtatd®n As mentioned previously, Urban Crossroads prepared a traffic study for the proposed project that analyzes the impacts of the proposed school on the local roadway network (Urban Crossroads .2x07). This section incorporates the results of this s#udy, which is included with this EIR as Appendix B. 4.15.1 Significance Thresholds Project impacts on traffic and circulation would be considered significant if the project would: Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system {i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume-to-capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) • Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways • Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks • Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature {e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses {e.g., farm equipment) • Result in inadequate emergency access • Result in inadequate parking capacity • Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation {e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks} F'rorn the perspective of CEQA compliance, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (GMP) does not contain specific significance criteria. Projects within the County that are consistent with the program are presumed to not have a significant impact an traffic and circulation as long as the project contributes to funding roadway improvements on a fair-share basis. The City ofi San Bernardino considers an intersection to have a deficiency if it operates with an LOS of "E" or "~'" The CMP requires additional analysis of such deficiencies to satisfy CMP requirements, which includes: Evaluation of the mitigation measures required to restore traffic operations to an acceptable level ofi service with respect to CMP and local jurisdiction LOS standards. • Calculation of the project share of new traffic on the impacted CMP facility during peak hours of traffic. • Estimation of the cost required to implement the improvements required to restore traffic operations to an acceptable level of service as described above_ 4-37 Wilson IF Elementary School ©raft Environmental Impact f~epart December, 2007 4.15.2 less Than Significant Impacts Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks The proposed project does not involve any kind of airfield operations or air traffic. This is a less than significant impact. Result in inadequate emergency access The proposed project will be constructed with appropriate emergency access in accordance with local improvement standards. Emergency access will also be maintained throughout the construction period. This is a less fihan significant impact. Result in inadequate parking capacity A parking study was prepared by Urban Crossroads and is also contained in Appendix B. The parking study concluded that the proposed project provides a total of 68 on site parking spaces. This will provide the majority of the required parking. Peak parking (mornings and afternoons) will require additional on street parking spaces that can be accommodated along the streets surrounding the project sifie. An analysis was also conducted to determine any conflicts with parking at the Arrowview Middle School. In terms of parking conflicts with both schools, it was determined that parking would be adequate to accommodate both schools. Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative Transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) The proposed project will not conflict with any existing programs related to alternative transportation. The project is located ran local streets and will not affect bus routes or turnouts. Bike racks have been incorporated into the site plan for the project. This is a less than significant impact. 4.15.3 Significant Environmental Impacts Gause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume-To-capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at infersecfions) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways COnStrUCtlOn Construction activities will generate traffic including construction workers, materials delivery vehicles and similar uses. The proposed project will also require importation of fill materials. The source and location of this material cannot be determined at this fiime. It is estimated that 30 round trips per day will be generated during the construction process. Designated truck routes will be deuelaped and a circulation pattern will be 4-38 Wilson I! Elemenfary Sclaaa! Draft Environmental lmpacf Report December, 2007 development once the source of material is identified_during the construction phase of the praject. This is a potentially significant impact. School Operation The traffic study analyzed traffic impacts associated with this project for two future years. The year 20'10 was chosen as an analysis year because this is the expected date the project would be in ,full operation. The year 2030 was chosen because it aligns with long range general plan conditions. Project traffic volumes were estimated using the CMP guidelines. The trip generation calculation is based on the most recent Institute of Transportation En inq eers_Trip Generation Rates, 7th Edition. Project trip distribution was reviewed and approved by the City of San Bernardino staff. The project-only traffic forecasts have been generated by applying the trip generation, distribution and traffic assignment calculations. The mare conservative trip generation factor based on student enrollment was used in the traffic analysis. Table 4.15-1 shows a comparison of estimated trip for the proposed school and far existing residential uses. Table 4.15-1 Trip Generation ~~~, ~ ~ #~r e, er t w ~ ~ Elementary School 772 Students 324 216 108 996 School Bus 4 4 8 Single Family 40 Dwelling 30 Nominal 4Q 383 Residential Units Net Total with Pro'ect 298 220 0 621 As indicated, the elementary school will generate additional daily and peak hour traffic compared to the existing residential uses. It should be noted that the analysis includes two different PM fiimeframes. The timeframe far the PM peak of the generator (school) does not coincide with the PM peak of the adjacent (arterial) street traffic. The peak for the school occurs before the peak far fihe commuters. For major (arterial) streets, the commuters cause the hinges overall traffic, while the school becomes the dominant factor for the residential streets in close proximity to the school. During the peak of the school, trip generation The traffic used the traffic generation calculations as input into a traffic model used to predict future 2010 and 2030 conditions in the study area. Figures 4.15-1 through 4.15-4 show the without_project and with-project traffic volumes for the years 2010 and 2030. A comparison between the without-project and with-project volumes shows that the praject will have a relatively minor effect on traffic volumes in the study area. An analysis of traffic operations was also conducted for the intersections in the study area. Table 4.15-2 shows the LOS far each of the study intersections with and without the praject in the 2010 study year. As shown, the E 5treet/28~h Street intersection would be LOS F without installation of a traffic signal and would be considered a deficient intersection per the City of San Bernardino guidelines. 4-39 XH{BIT 4 A IIi1TER11V1 YEAR WITH®UT PRCIlECT AVERAGE ®~RtLY TRAFFIC {A®T} r+s~• rr- -~.~.~ ...,,,,...m r~rrw.: . F, ~.,~wrssww •v E 1 ~' - ,' [ ~ 2aTH sT. ~ ~' ?.a ?s 2.1 ?s I Jfr x C7 a ~ tt3 "_ _ 27TH ST. ] ri COURTf_AND DR. - 0 0.T 28TH ST. `n M ~ 0.2 r^ 0.3 26TH 5T. o ~ ci _i ~ ni lll3:'i~y ~ ¢ 25TH ST. M i ~ , i it ~ 0.9 E ~"j~'~" ~'i 25TH ST. - w r r~ o € ..,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o O 24TH ST. c ~ II ~ J - Q i U 06 i "' A ~- 23RD ST. ~ Y ~ ~, ~ ~ 1.T H m ~ j ~ ~ 1 I; ; HIGHLAND AV. ~ - 25.1 26.5 24.2 23.8 23.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( v "' ~ ~ LEGEf~D: 0 10,0 ~ VEHICLES PER DAY X100©'5) 0 .:.i ni ~ WILSON I1,E~EMENTARY SCHOOE, San Bernardino, Catifarnia_•034Z9: 23 ;URBAN .- t„7 DS ~ 200 1NTERINI YEAR DRAWN BY: D. FAHRNEY WITWOUiT PROJECT RI~1/1SE1~ 8Y: D. FAHRNEY ~~0 1370 Valley Vista Drive, Suite 150 AI/ERAt~E ®AiLY TRAF~~C ¢ ~ o CHECKED BY: JVV ~x~ Diamond Bar, CA 99765 FIGURE PH. (909) 396-0335 FAX. (909) 396-1324 VIALSON II ELI=MENTARY SCHOOL www.kleinfelder.cam SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ~ o DRAWN; 03/23/07 APPRpVED B~C;___,______ PROJECT Nq, 64477 FILE NAME:4-95-9.dwg ® by igelnTetdar 1nc., 20tf7 EXI~ifBl~' 4.g ~®~~31NTERIM YEAiR ~fTH PRi~~ECT ~~ER~~E ~~~Y T~AFF~c ~A~T~ '' ~ Y ......_.-..._~_~..~.-.-tea Y,~ y '~+44 ®' ~ ~ ~" 28TH $T, a.s 2.a 2.~ a.9 1 2 U' N - ~ ~ O g . 27TH sr. i M COUFtT#.AND DR. 9 H o.7 ~ ZsTH sT. "~ ----~ t a.2 ~ a.5 zsTH sr. 0 9 ~ _ ~ i~ 4 6"; a. l a 25TH ST. "' 'a Z ~ a 90 1 r SI?'IS`.. i 2sTH ST. _ 6 24TH ST. i__~~_u.~u__ J M ~ r -' ~ 1 a a.s Q.2 ¢ f 1 ,r, f ~ U p 23Rp ST. T I ~ 7.7 H N ua ~ i v.; h ~ 1 HIGHLAND AV. ~ 25.9 26.6 24.3 23.9 23.a " g ~ m H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U LEGEND: p 9a.a =VEHICLES PPR DAY {7fl00'S] _i J ~ Il.. ~ WILSON ll EE£MENi"AftY SCHOOL San Bernardino, California - 03429: 24_,__ _ 1J126AM ~ U in m rn ~ 20'10 INTERIM YEAR bnAwldsY; D.FAHRNEY WITH PROJECT REVISEp 8Y: D. FAHRNEY ~~~, AVERAGE DAILY TRAF1=iC w ~ 1370 Valley Vista Drive, Suite 150 CHECKEb BY: JW _ X v Diamond Bar, CA 91785 u~two PIi. (909) 398-0335 FAX. (909) 388-1324 WILSON II ELEMENTARY SGI~IOOL FIGURE ~~O www.klelnfetder.oom SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL bISTRICT SAN BERNARC31N0, CALIFORNIA Q ¢ Q bF2AWN: 031231€37 APPROVED 8Y: PROJECT NO. 64477 FILE NAIUIE:4-45-2,dWg ~ by IQeSnfesder r~~., zoa~ EXHIBIT ~-C Z®3~ WITHOUT PR®JECT VEI~ACE DAILY TRAFFIC (~L~T) ____~--. _ ~ _ ~' ~ .-. a 2aTC~ sT. i 4.0 3.8 4.7 4.6 1 %f y ~ nH,' ~ ~ ~ i p 1 27TH sr. ~ c+i CO€1RTLAND RR. 0.8 ' zer~t sT. "' N 0.3 M D,3 26TH ST. a (' 25TH ST. ri ~:-:::;}: "' ri n 9.4 i:~:::: ~;r~~ i 2bTli ST. ~ udi ~ r;. ~ ~ ~ r....;, .:...:::......:..:.:::r ~ ~ 24Ttf ST. r;~:~,~;N~~~ ~~:T :T _i N ¢ 0.6 -- ~ d v ~ - .- ! it ~ 23RD ST. " m J ~ h ~ ti j. h!!Gt€LANO Av. ~ 28.5 32.2 29.fi 25.2 26.5 " ~ cv m ~ ~ ~ i ~t ~ LEGi1wND: 0 10.0 = VEHlClE5 PER l~AY {7ppp'S) J J L[. ~ WILSON if ELEMENTARY 5CHOOL, San Bemardina, California • 03429: 25 ,~~ ~ ~FtBAN ~- U d~ cn 2©3© WITHOUT PROJECT DRAWN E3Y: Q. FAHRNI=Y AVERAGE fAILY TRAFFIC REVIS~DBY: p, FAHRNEY ~ a ~ 1370 Valley Vista Drive, Suite 150 CHEClCt=D BY: JW x ~ Diamond Bar, CA 91765 ~ ~ ~ PH. (909) 396-0335 F'AX. (909) 396-1324 WILSON 11 ELEMENTARY SC~fOOL FIGURE ~U ~ www.kleinfelder.com SAN BERNARD[NO CITY UNIFIED SCHggL bISTRiCT ~ ~ ,qa J SAN i3ERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 1[ Q ~ ~ DRAWN: 03!23107 APPROVED 8Y' PROJECT NO. 64477 FILE NAME:4-15-3.d+Ng 0 by K#elnfelder tnc„ 2pp'7 ~X~1161~' 4-p Z~~~ WTH ~~~~ECT AvERA~E ~~~L~ TR~F~c ~~®T> _~.~-_ -_.~_ ''~~ i d ~' ~ ~ /~ 4. ~ 1 B 28TH ST. ~ 4.1 3.8 4.8 4-8 ~f ~ ~ n ~ w .~- ~ ~ ~ 27TH ST. ~r C~URTLANC3 DR. ~ ep 0.8 ~ 26TH 5T. `"~ ~ 0.3 M p,g 28TH ST. c I 25TH ST. sh j~ b ~ Q 1.1 . ,,: ~.,:,.:..~ITE:;2;s';r 25TH sr. ~ h- c0 E`::i:-i: i'ri::ii:.{i~;'r?:~i:~;:d:~::~E it ya ~ 29TH ST. i;:iyuivu:~~u~~ ;:i ~ ~ ~ ~ D.7 0.2 ; a U ~ 2aRp sr. ~ ~ M J ~ ti ~ HIGHLAND AV. ~ ~ 29.0 32.3 29,7 29.3 26.6 ~ - Q ~ ~,, N d - ....ll ' ~ ~ tom-. If Q Q V II..~~7~N~}: 90.0 ~ VEHICLES PER E7AY (9000'S) nJ, J il.. ~ WILSON li ELEMENTARY SCWOOEt Sarr Bernardino, CaEifornia _03424; 26 _-_. _, _ U~BAN .~- U '~yy. G1 t71 ~ 2030 WITH PROJECT DRAWN BY: D. F'AHRNEY L L AVERAGE ©All~."Y" TRAFFIC REVISE© BY: D. F'AHRNEY ~11 0 1370 Valley Vista i]rive, Suife 150 CHECKEt} BY: JW ~U f)iarnond Bar, CA 91765 FEGURE ~ ? i; PH. {909) 396-0335 EAX. (909) 396-1324 WILSON II E1-1:.MENTARY SCH©OL UU~ www.klelnfelder.cpm SAN BERNARi71N0 CITY EJNIFIED SCHC1ClL DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ~~/, o PRAWN: 03!23107 APPROVED 13Y: PRQJECT NO. 64477 FILE NAIIAE:4-95-4.dwg ~i~r © by IQeinrsidsr Inc., 2007 Wilson Elementary Schaaf Draft Enviranmenfa! Impact Reparf December, 2D07 Table 4.1 ~-2 2U'It7 Intersectiorp Lovell of Service (With arsd Without Pr®~ec#) A~ ,~ ~ ~ ~;- r ~~~~rel of S~:n?il~e' LevQl of h- ~tth'x7U~ '.a~l'l~tC~ ~ `n T,,T~~C ~~"~ B'G~ W1'fii~ IP~~ ~`C~ ,~ ~,~ ~~lnte~s~ctr~n~ ....:., ,..:m..m contrail .m .w ~M... _ P,M _._._:~.ANi_.::.. P~..~W H.Street at Highland Avenue TS B i3 B B G Street at 28 Street CSS B A B A Caurtiand Drive C55 A A B A 26 5treef West CSS B A B A 26 Street East CSS B A B B 25 Street (without impraverr~ents) C55 A A B A 25 5treef {with improvements) CSS - - C B 24 Street C55 B A B B 23~ 5treef CSS B A B B Highland Avenue ~ TS B B B B F Street at 26 Street East C55 A A A A E Street at 28 Street (without improvements) CSS .......~'...... ' ~ . -~ F 28 Street (with improvements) TS C C C C Highland Avenue TS C C C C TS-traffic signal CSS---cross street stop Shaded cells indicate deficient intersection conditions Table 4.15.3 provides the same LOS information for the 2t)3~ model year. The changes in LOS levels reflect anticipated increase in traffic due to the proposed project. The "with improvement line entry also reflects the additional let added #o the intersection to provide access to the school. 4-44 Wilson 1! Elerrrenfary Schaal Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 Table 4.~~-3 2030 Intersection Levels of Service i<With and Without Project ~ . b T k iLeyel of s~xv~ce >,~..eve~af -~ ~ ~ . r ~~" ~ ~ ~ (1?lfrtii~o~t ~ ~Serv~~~ ~, . ~ _ ~Traffi~~ pro pct ~ ~ With P-iw"o pct ,~~.~. ,.~~1#~1'SeC~lOfl<a.,, ~ ~~~~[Q`I..:...., ~,~li~` ~" ,~~ ~,.-~_ _ .~,_ W _~,_. .a.., ~, ~ . H Street at Highland Avenue TS B A B A G Street at 28 Street CSS B. A B B Courtland Driue CSS A A B A 26 Street West CSS A A B A 26 Street East CSS B A B B 25 Street {without improvements) CSS A A B A 25 Street {with improvements) CSS - - B B 24 Street CSS B A B B 23` Street CSS B A B B Highland Avenue TS B A B A F Street at 26 Street East CSS A A A A E Street at 28 Street (without improvements) CSS = f=. ,. fi _ ~': E .,.::::. ~ ..::, 28 Street (with Improvements) TS C ~~_D C D Highland Avenue T5 C C C C TS-traffic signal CSS-Cr055 Street Stop Shaded cells indicate deficient intersection conditions Similar to the 2010 intersection analysis, the E Sfireet/28~~' Street intersection would be LOS ~' without installation of a traffic signal and would be considered a deficient infiersectian per the City of San Bernardino guidelines. This is a potentially significant impact. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment) The Payout of the proposed elemenfiary school presents certain circulatian~related issues that could cause hazardous traffic conditions. These issues include such things as the need for signage for pedestrian safety, sight distance considerations, and the locations of driveways relative to the lace! street layout. These deficiencies in the site plan are a potentially significant impact. A suggested Safe Routes to School Plan was prepared for this report and is contained in Appendix B. This plan suggests routes to school and makes recommendations on signage and ether design features. 4-45 Wilson Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 4.15.4 Mitigation Measures MM 4.15-1: Contribute to the cost of intersection/traffic signal improvements {up to 5.45 %) at the intersection of E street128th Street on a fair share basis. The 5.45°/a is approximately the proportion of traffic contributed by the proposed project. The costs of this traffic signal will be determined by the City of San Bernardino once the requirements and project design is completed. The casts for this type of installation may be in the $500.000 range. Construction of a traffic signal at this intersection will be needed to relieve an expected deficiency at this intersection in the future. This project would not cause this deficiency on its awn, but would contribute to the unacceptable SOS in bath the 2010 and 2030 study years. Implementation of-this measure would reduce the impact fio a Tess than significant level. MM 4.15-2: Current plans designate the proposed southerly driveway along G Street as inbound only and align with 24th Street to the west. MM 4.15-3: Current plans designate the proposed northerly driveway along G Street as outbound only and align with 25th Street to the west. install a stop sign at the proposed driveway. MM 4.15-4: Eliminate proposed parking along the south side of 26th Street due to the conflict with the propased drop-off area slang 26t~' Street. MM 4.15-5: install a stop sign at the drop-off outbound driveway along 26th Street. MM 4.15-6: Install signage for assisting pedestrians near the school site for safety purposes. Also construct sidewalks along 24th Street. MM 4.15-7 Routes for ingress and egress of trucks hauling fill materials to the s"rte will be designated in consultation wifih the City of San Bernardino. Haul times wilt 'be coordinated to avoid peak traffic hours. Construction schedules including delivery of materials will be coordinated to avoid peak hours where feasible. Implementation of Measures MM 4.15-2 through 7 wilt reduce the potential for safety issues and. circulation conflicts afi the Schaal site. In addition, the site plan must comply with local improvement standards for sight distance requirements. These measures will reduce the impacts described above to a less than significant level. 4.15.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to traffic and circulation would result from this project. 4 - 46 Wilson I! Elementary Schpp! flraft Environmental lmpacf Repprf 17ecember, 2007 5 ~~IV~LAT~VE I~V1~A~TS This sec#ion describes the cumulative impact of the construction of the prapased Wilson II Elementary Schaal when combined with other existing, approved, proposed, or reasonably foreseeable projects within the praject area. Consultation with the City of San Bernardino did not identify any projects in the vicinity of the proposed project; however the proposed development of the new schools within the SBCUSD as well as the operation of the Arrowview Middle School, which is located adjacent to-the prapased project site, are considered in #his analysis. 5,1 Ae~~h~:tics 5.1.1 Impact Implementation of the prapased praject will change the character of the project site from residential character to a more institu#ional character associated with a new school site. The proposed project together with the existing Arrawview Middle School will create a more institutional character for the area. Since the new and the existing- facilities are landscaped and not tall structures and are' not located near scenic highways, the cumulative impacts do not reach levels to be cumulatively considerable. 5.'1.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures for cumulative impacts are required. 5.2 Air Qualifiy 5.2.1 Impact Implementation of the proposed project will have the potential to crea#e significant impacts associated with canstructian, but will ,.not have significant impacts associated with operation of the facility. This includes those impacts associated with the traffic and other ac#ivities. Through mitigation, the construction impacts wilt be reduced to less than significant levels. The prapased praject will produce greenhouse related gases #hat are of consideration. However, the project does not require the expenditure of substantial energy nor does i# generate substantial traffic. By having an elementary school serving the local area, vehicle trips will be reduced by allowing students to wal[c to school and reduce the amount of required bussing. 5.2.2 Mitigation Measures The proposed project will mitigate its cumulative canstructian ac#ivities and no additional mitigations are required. 5-1 Wrlson Elementary Schoo! Draft 'nvironmental Impact Report December, 20{37 5.3 Biological Resources 5.3.1 Impact The proposed project will result in the loss of landscape plants including mature trees. There will also be some disruption of urban related wildlife habitat. Although this impact is adverse, it is not considered to be of a level to be cumulatively considerable. 5.3.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5.4 Cultural Resources 5.4.1 Impacts Implementation of the proposed project in the cumulative baseline will result in the loss of older homes in the region. The cultural resource analysis indicates that 29 homes may be significant historic resources. The loss of these homes is considered cumulatively considerable.. There is a remote potential that the proposed project and other projects in the cumulative baseline may have a remote potential to disrupt resources or paleontological resources. This impact is potentially cumulatively considerable but can be reduced to less than significant levels by mitigation. 5.4.2 Mitigation Measure No mitigation is available to reduce the impact to historic resources to less than significant levels. Monitoring of sites during grading shall be conducted for cultural and paleontological resources. In the event that potential resources are encountered, work shall be halted until the site is evaluated by a qualified archaeologist or paleontologist. The site should be tested and the resource recovered if necessary. 5.5 Ceology and Soils 5.5:1 Impact The proposed project site as well as the projects within the cumulative baseline may be subjected to severe seismic groundshaking and on a site specific basis subjected #o expansive soils or liquefaction. Assuming that each project would involve site specific 5-2 Wilson 11 Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2Q07 geotechnical evaluations and specific designs, this impact is not considered cumulatively considerable. 5.5.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5.fi Hazards and Hazardous [V,la#erials 5.6.1 Impact The proposed project will have a potential to use hazardous and toxic materials primarily during the construction period. Other projects in the area may also use these materials. Although there is a potential for release of these materials during the construction period, use of the spill prevention and contingency plans wilt reduce any impact to less than significant levels and this impact is therefore not cumulatively cans"rderable. 5.6.2 Mitigation Measures Na additional mitigation measures are required. 5.7" Hydrology and '41Va~er Qualify 5.7.1 Impact Implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to increase the amount of runoff from the site or contribute to additional urban runoff assuming the implementation of the water quality management plan. Criteria pollutants including nutrients, sediments, and bacteria/viruses are not expected to increase over current levels. Construction activities may create considerable sediments. Use of a storm water pollution prevention plan best management practices will reduce this impact to less than significant impact. Therefore the proposed project is not considered cumulatively considerable. 5.7.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5-3 Wilson l! Elementary School Draft Environments! Impact F;eport December, 2007 5.~ Land Use and !'[arming 5.8.1 Impact Implementation of the proposed project will eliminate 40 older homes located in a well established neighborhood. The City ofi San Bernardino has determined that the loss ofi this neighborhood and the construction ofi the new school are not consistent with the City's General Plan. Nn additional projects will result in creating inconsistencies with the General Plan. This impact is considered significant and cumulatively considerable. 5.8.2 Mitigation Measures Other than the adoption of a no project alternative or another site, no mitigation has been .identified. 5,9 Mineral Resources 5.9.1 Impact The proposed project and other projects in the cumulative baseline will not impact sand, gravel or other mineral resources. Na impact will occur. 5.9.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5.°i0 Popula~ior and Housing 5.10.1 Impact Implementation of the proposed project will result in the removal ofi 40 homes and displacement of approximately 200 persons. This will require relocation of the residents of the project area. The housing inventory in the San Bernardino area is sufficient to absorb this housing requirement without necessitating construction of new housing. The impact is considered less than significant and wilt not be cumulatively considerable. 5.10.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5-~ Wilson 11 Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 5.1°1 Public Ser~rices 5.11.1 Impact Implementation of the proposed project will require police, fire, paramedic and other services as will the other projects under cumulative consideration. Although the proposed project may require additional police services, this increase is considered small because elementary schools require little pnlice services and the SBCUSD has their own police force far security and police protection. its impact is considered to be less than significant and will not be cumulatively considerable. 5.11.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5.12 N®ise 5.12.1 Impact Implementation of the proposed project will create noise impacts associated with the construction acid operation of the school. There will also be an increased noise impact in the area associated with the adjacent Arrawview Middle School combined with the new school and other noise sources in the area. Based an the noise study prepared for this project, the noise levels will not exceed the noise standards identified, this impact is not considered cumulatively considerable. 5.12.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5.1 ~ Recreation 5.13.1 Impact The proposed project will not generate any additional demand for recreation services_ In fact, the playground area provided by the new school will increase recreation facilities in the area. 5.13.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5-5 Wilson I! Elementary Schaal ©raft Environmental Impact f?epart ©ecember, 2007 5.14 T~a~fic and Transportation 5.14.1 Impact The traffic analysis included in Appendix B of this EIR addresses the cumulative impact of the proposed project (future conditions with the proposed project) j.lntersections in the project area will operate at an acceptable level of service except for the intersection of E Street and 2$ Street. Without traffic improvements, the intersection will operate at a level of Service F. The proposed project traffic contributions range from 1.07 to 5.45 percent of this congestion based on the contribution of the proposed project trafl:tc. An analysis of the cumulative parking assoc"rated with the current operation of Arrowview Middle School and the proposed Wilson II ES has determined that there- is no significant cumulative impact associated with parking demands for both schools. 5.14.2 Mitigation Measures SBCUSD will contribute its fair share of the cost for the improvement of the interchange up #a 5.45 percent of the cost of the intersection improvements. 5.15 utilities 5.15.1 Impact The proposed project as well as other projects in the cumulative baseline will require water, sewer, and other public utilities. The amount is less than the utilities that would be required for the existing residential area. The proposed project would not create a significant impact to the utility infrastructure and is therefore not cumulatively considerable. 5.15.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5-6 Wilsan I! Elementary Schaal ©raff ,Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 6 ~L~~~~~T~~~ ~~~L~S~~ ~."~ IntrfaCit,YCtiOrl This section addresses the alternatives to the proposed development of the Wilson it Elementary Schoa) as currently proposed. The proposed project is intended to relieve current and future overcrowding at the existing Wilson Elementary school and other nearby elementary schools within the SBCUSD. The proposed school site is located within the western portion of the Wilsan Elementary attendance area and in this manner is intended to roughly split the existing area to facilitate students walking to the site from their homes. CEQA requires the EIR identify alternatives to the proposed project that will reduce or eliminate one or mare significant impacts. This analysis focuses on these alternatives. 6.2 No F'ro~ect Alternatives 6.2.1 Description of Alternative The No Project Alternative would result in na construction of Wilson II Elementary School at the proposed site or elsewhere within the attendance area. This alternative would not preclude construction of other planned elementary schools within the SBCUSD. 6.2.2 Impacts of the Alternative Implementation of the alternative would eliminate impacts associated with the construction and operation of the school. In particular, the alternative would not require the taking of homes and the resulting significant and unavoidable impacts to historic resources. Additionally, it would eliminate any traffic and parking impacts as well as significant and unavoidable land use impacts. Implementation of the No Project Alternative would have substantial impacts to the operations of the SBCUSD. The Wilson II attendance area would continue to be impacted, as it would continue to require year round operation and busing of students to other schools outside of the attendance area. This would place additional strain on the existing Wilson Elementary School and other schools in the area through increased capacity and continuation of year round schools. 6.3 Alternative School Sites This alternative would involve placement of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School at alternative locations. The SBCUSD identified two alternative school sites during its identification of the proposed site. These sites are in the southeastern portion of the attendance area and are shown in Figure 6.3--1. The impacts are described below. s-~ 3 afinl ~ -/~aisr I~ ' ~ i.. E~ i t,~ ci i'I x~~ ~~-,.~,. t -- - P' rcosatlOri-...._ ~~_., ~ ~`r? ,~,yy { I fpFppF a tn= 3 /~ 1 4i ~~-I CI ~' ~j{ ~~E ! ['~i~ jtl ~si a€ - it~,~`,...1(:~ .3 'Y~J if~ % ~I ~ i~~r-,"~`~er -~ I" ~~I ,i ~ t~.. ~I (~-ti ~I 13g~Rtk ; .'Q~~~ ,,. ? .# , { t ' ~ 1 P~'r;k I t ~ ' t ' s~ ->s }f5es!€'-ranee E ~ }"-_~ crk o~y € i ; ~ r t., ~ i~ ~ 4€ z t ? j a~4F 'L ~ - t it ~ f~ z~ ~ € ~ 1 ' € it C~ `'J A ~ ~ ~~..' ~ i '~`.'~.~--~?~"" --'-, ~ I I' _ F ~ t.----° ~ ~ i -. t W t (" G~ t(~ ry , .s; I \ *~.:~~"\~`r_. ~, r~i,~~ ~ i E r_,_.,3, ~ v4<ien Valley ~'."'_-W~, ~,~ ~ I a i ~yi r r t("~ cg's-1. - ? ~'~ t t1, ~ ~i a al "! +yl J J '~` ~ \\~, •/ I~ a ~",~ ; 6 .37ir~t ~ S I t3a6 r U ~- -. Fr , ~ ~ 11 ¢ ~u . ` F( ti f~ ~ ~ # I~ , I 3 t ~ YS'ateF ~ ~ ~3 ~,if /~; ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~, ~,~- ~I _ 3grrf ~ ~ i! jil ii -~~i I,6T~c '~~ ]E Tznk® 6,'~~ dt C..~ -I ~i ~ f 3 utff 1 j E}.- { ~rw ( li .A ~ ~3 O r f r t , ~ ti >f ~ ~ ~ f iii I ~1 ~ ~ ' l~ a EEl i '3 ~ Ir~ ..:...r.~-~--a I a - - I .B _ 4~ ' 2 -: Q 1 ~~--~' Cif € F ~ ~ ~,; F~..i ~h ~ f ii/rr~t ~ ,~ '€ 5 ~ I~ i ~ E BNgd 1 'il i € ,a €i fI . ~ [ S ~ ~r-/.-~- ' / ~, r fr ti r , _ " _.a(~ { _ . ~Y _l ~I ~--I a, U € ""~ ~ [ s ,,~ i.r. G f~,~„fti _r ~t a~ ~ 1 , w l4 ti i f E E ~ d , p c T ~ f pG/,'"~?F` r .Jt 41 l 3k~wx-i#_... Wi'~ { € i~~a~:~.s I ~L '- i. ~ 1' 3, ~~1 ., ill S~ '~~.jr~-i{~----*;'. -~~"~"~''''",-"""'', r~---"j 'x'Yai4~-ti' !r i. I--~ ~;='-1y}w'~"~(' I = . t, 1 '-'~. ~ ~yl 1 b" ~' a...!-°~"W"~1.1 ~~'^ . €1~~ h!{ } Qf " ?~il jj~ rLlf 3~~C 3F ~w~lld/ I. l !!S h ~ i _-.:~~` I~ 4~ #~ ~,, li I i u 6 ?I .S. IF #i .~,i ~ 'iia 1 ~ '3~~»~A~,p' p 1 ~, 1 1 '~."" ~.y-.I' i ] ,_~J r_ L ~.WW. SL zl 31.».,-~ul....~~.:~3 ik p~'~~ k ~ ~ ~476N1rA ®~~iw - I i 3 ~ '~ ~ j~ ~ ~ t,~_., ~~h .l ! Ipp~' AEI jl ~I' i'~~ ill- `e ~~i. I€' € u -g Y j l" ~'F~ . { I} ~ ire ~ 31 f Ism !c z ~ ~~C I - r / t ':r 7i~~ 7dk~5~rA~.f.,.-.9i di1..,... 1 ~(8L`~nii'~, i~ aNti i ~3~ ~ ~ f -. Ifr,~an5uA11 u-. ,'`~ Ir--=--'~'~~ ~ } ~ ~ , '~~ ~ tV~"~~ i~ W_eli , 'i-~ ~tC.:~...._.__i~ i ~ ~-. ~ r~I ~ 3 j~ t ~ -~}'. Ii.:.~.i ~i:'. ~~i~_9 f Qii ~' ~ i~~. ~ `H w E~ k!I ie„:.~Sl~ .~.`-~,~ ~ ~~~~~'t :w--, --~ "'~# _ s_.F i eservo~~"lLl~ ii s f~iit ~ ^~I ,i ~'."j~ ~ `II i f " ~ 3i A -Z~-. II j~. ~ ~ ~I ~~- \4 ~l!/J~TT.`r----- t i~~ 1 EE ,.a ~ ~ ~1 i t i 3 iB ~ 1 1 i{_.._ «ao -,tt~ - E .~I c.~~rvsro r --u '-,~, V'i~d`~la~p a f` ~I >~~i ~i ~12~9 i~ I E 6E~ ' ~ ;II~~ `"'~ r-~ i ~ ~ a 4'r T~ ~ - " ~ ~..__:...i~. F ~._~Lr. ~~t.-.~Y~ 'E..~,.ir'" w ~g~ g} I £I I ~ ~--- ~ I~.~.i ~Iu_ ~F ,,~..~ E ci €I n r i ~ i ~ ~~9v~ r'° F r 2...._ W.rra *oa i': { r. t2EP e.~ _ ~ ..ILr.Ee~....~E.~ x "-~--_ It~ i I{ . ~ '°~~ f ~'"i---- ai ~E tt I ~3 X14{ 1 ~ i~ ~Y tnn`~ ~"~ 1~I~ 111 o I~~ """--~I ~ ~ ...i .~-"r'_ ~ t~ € 2&rrs 'lr" ~'1s ~r~ ST~~::. - ' I~ c.~ ~ ~ _ ~ 4~' ~ ~t,...~~ ': t ~ L eFr&i,~~' 3 9PW [~~~aE t ', ~ li i[~„ a I.I,~~ ~ ~, (-`-~JJ } 'E~ Ii_~~.p.~t2P~ a ~ jF [ ~~'~' -r,k~ ,~}~.-~~ a" ~ i~ ~ ~ ~E._..».:11 $rF.:~E____{L-rte e ~ ~1 7.~-° 4L I'BDL~4AARY {`'_'_iP 3 ' ~M". T 13D~~ i _ 7+ a.i ~ ~ - J . I-- ~- wit- --'"~~ ---fv - I -.-r ~.~.~a ~ L._ . V:_._.~l ~,'t``., yr- ~ `~~' rC~Mt i ,~' ~ary,~~ ~ r ncz I -~-.... } -°' = Ij~~ i ~ { € 32iT5 --a i r ~ ~ ~,~ _ .~~.Eiot E R~ k I~ t !3 ~ I ~ ~''~ 3 ~~I ~i ~-u ~" i ~ ~ ~I ~ _ is--1i=3 118 ~~3'~ ~ ~'t-> ~i~kr~ ~3 ~ ~1~~~ ~~~-~ r ~ a -~3 - E ~ 5~ :z~ '~ ~~~._._._i~ - ,~ '.~......~I~ i >,, i- ; . v k } (~~, ; i} Q; ~k jl ~'i R li~,u1 {~arvwtir e L,::" E I~! I QI{ Fw E!'.15 n il" ~-~? UE Il ~ '. ._.=1 ~1~11 .R:°- ~6~1 ~ .~Q ~L.._i.~ ~ ~G 1 i~,.~. i ~ a` {E~' ~.-_ ~...,_.. ~.~_.ia~ Sul ~ ,1~ 1 i't_ f` t ~'i 1.,.,1 3- ''ii _ ~;lun€or~4rM ~ _ ~ E 1~~~ HJG ~WNl3 II -~ ,,c,_„.r~.. ,~ ~ .T,., .~.,,Ati~{1E-~-._.~. i~~:zs ('~ t ° rrFE ~~.M CiI~~~.~r E~~"y = 8Rt ` , y.. g ~i ~, ~Aerr :,,~ ~ s ==i~.........._., ,~.s" }~lFi7 I~ ~ I! :`.I{ f it '~rM:,a~~=w~..(c~i !S ,..y ~ € r .....t~--°'..]c ~ J ~ t ., i` _'a ~ ,..172 ~ Bernar4lrrFe. i' i/'~' ~ i I ~ N ~~"'.-,~.» ~ i,G tE I 2i.~Ta3[ ~9 I ~ ~1SrJ~ ~`ry5pit21 i~ ~''~~~mr~~`+''~l~y~J ~ 14 ~ ~~~"r t~ s / i ~j 1 ~ , ~ --.~'r` ~ ui E~.~ ~l "'mil ~' ~'° i'~~' ~~I~~ ~~-~I~[ ~~-` ! ~~J/~ ~"'"' li7.i55~ c~ ~ ~I' -~1~ t 3~ . I~ i#__.~~ J ~ E[ ~ ~€I~ €F. ~ ~,i~ ~ _.C~i.S c ,A ,€~ L.l ~ t"_"'"'"_', '~innE fan BeFr<arclriinlia~ ra7'r~ €t k is sr : ~ [ 'ti, ~ `y,'.~~..a C1 i ~ ~ HcghSr7~ ~a j€ f !f'v~l (I :la ti~~~ ~ ?' "°r~'-' ` _c_ 11 _ I>c ` III ~ ~ K E kl ,€t a 18~2~1138 ~{E ~ c.----~~~~~.~~~~. ~t r .f~ ~ `eCoE3r1 `i ~, qty F , t ~ ~ t~ © E~P7;Elk'q s _~i ~L tW, ~ 3i f8't^_.t~ lu..-."~ ~~Jt ~ SLJ .-.-. ..r. ~ aiR'vi" J~i°Id~'.QCtFf,~{ CS -~ r -..1" _._.....Sr ~ [ _ t"'-" j I pSpet2 I ~, j ,=2"-~°~." ~t I { 71€ ~-.~.,:_,~ I i .P €f '-~ i_ It_~ 3"=r 5t2ittonC ~ '~~ _ ~°.:~, ,~~ I ° ~ ~E 47 ~ ........__~1_~,[~~,; ~ rai_A~nrd~.rA ~ I ~il .aul~ ~ ~r rx~N . i Sr --IE t ~'Jel3 ~ yti_ "' ~ € II LLI ""~~ --- ~ I r ~-f -z I : ! I BN ri2iw x-~'a-ll-'tr=~1(~,~ ~ gI 11 ' I ' ...1 ~ _{~E~} ~ ~ i j i~~..~r rarar ~ l~sr 3 ~', -{~ fir?.' j~"`..~t -~--- ~ '_~! I { ~ fil e - ~ E it ~ ti I~~:. E ,- ~ ~~.>srh l,~~z.~i ii I= ,~ ~ W_~~1~~if~` ii ,, it '.,..~_(~ .I~~i~~'~ - ~ ~, . ~ If ~~1~ I`" ,. ';i M U ~ - -. CSI SOtJRGIm; ll.S.G.S. 7.5' Yopagrophic series, Son Bernordino North, Coiifarnia ~ FEAT 2,000 quodrongle dated 1967, photorevised 1988. sip r~ ~ BRAWN BY: b, FAHRNEY wrri r~AL,T~R~1I~,~'~'~~ REVISED BY: D. l~AHRNEY ~ w ~ 1370 Valley Vista Drive, Suite 150 CHECKED BY: ,fW ~X¢ biamond Bar, CA 99765 ? O ~ PH. (909) 398-0335 FAX. (909) 396-1324 lNILSON II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PLATE ~ ~ ° www.kieinf~lder.com SAN BERNARDINO CITY LJNIFIEC3 SCHOOL b15TF21CT y Q ~ SAN BERNARflINO, CALIFORNIA ~ ~ ~ Q ¢ n DRAWN: 03123/t37 APPROVED BY. PRO.IECT NO. 64477 FILE NAME:B-3-1.dwg ©by tQelnFe€der Inc., 2D07' Wilson I1 Elementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report . December; 2007 6.3.1 Alternative Site No. '1 Description of Alfernafive This alternative would involve the construction of a new school on an approximately 8 acre site on the northwestern corner of Lugo Avenue and Highland Avenue. The alternative site is bounded by Highland, Lugo, Sierra and a less defined location to the north. The project site would consist of commercial and residential properties. It is anticipated that a design similar to the proposed Wilson Il School would be prepared for the site. Environmental Impact Implementation of the alternative would involve loss of homes and some commercial establishments resulting in a potentially significant land use impact. Some of the homes may also be considered historically significant. It is further anticipated that traffic, noise and air quality impacts would be similar to the proposed project .because the same major roadways would be involved. There would also be construction related noise impacts. There would also be further impacts through the loss of commercial property associated with the proposed project. This alternative site is located within the southeastern portion of the Wilson attendance area and would not be a desirable location for the new school because the students that the new Wilson II School Would serve are located within the western portion of the attendance area. This location would require students to walk further and would have potential increased safety concerns due to crossing busy roadways. Based on the location of the alternative site and the similar level of impacts to the proposed project, this alternative was rejected. 6.3.2 Alternative Site No.2 Description of Alternative This alternative would involve the construction of a new elementary school on the southeast corner of Lugo Avenue and Highland Avenue. The alternative is on an approximately 9 acre site bounded by Lugo Avenue, Highland Avenue, North Wall Avenue and 215 Street. The project site involves commercial, residential and multi family dwellings. A school similar in design to the Wilson 11 School would be constructed on the site. Environmental Impact The alternative would have similar traffic, noise, air quality, and geotechnical issues to the proposed project. There would also be significant impacts to land use and housing due fio loss of homes as well as commercial buildings. Some of the homes in the area may also be considered significant from a historic perspective. The alternative would also create safety impacts associated with students from the Wilson Elementary School attendance area crossing Highland Avenue. 6-3 Wilsan 1! Elementary School Draft Enviranmenfa! Impact Report December, 2007 The location of the Schoo! site as with alternative site No. 1 would not be located within the portion of the Wilsan Elementary school attendance area where it is needed. This would require students to walk further and cross busy streets. For these reasons, the alternative was rejected. 6.4 Expansion of Vlril~on !Site 6.4.1 Description of Alternative This alternative would involve the physical expansion of the Existing Wilson I site to accommodate additional students. It is envisioned that the school would involve construction of additional classrooms and other expanded facilities such as a larger cafeterialauditorium and library facility. In order to keep the playground and other facilities of required size, the site would require expansion by approximately 4 acres. Additional existing homes surrounding the school would be required to be lost to gain this additional land. It is also likely that the expansion of the school would not be eligible for State of California funding due to the size of the school. 6.4.2 Environmentallmpacts Implementation of the alternative would result in less intense impacts than the proposed project. This would include impacts to land use and housing and traffic related impacts. Same of the pauses that would be lost may also be historically significant. The intensity of these impacts would be anticipated to be less than the proposed project. Although the alternative project would provide additional student capacity, it would not allow for provision of a school site in the western portion of the attendance area. The Schaal site would exceed ?IStrICt and California Department of Education maximums for elementary schools. For these reasons, the alternative was rejected. 6.5 Collocation on Arrowview Middle School Site 6.5.1 Description of Alternative This alternative would involve the collocation of the new Wilsan II Elementary School on the Arrowview Middle Schaal Site. The new school would be constructed on the athletic fields and would function as a separate entity from the Intermediate School. Because the amount of playground area would not meet state standards, it is likely that some of the current houses adjacent to the school would be required to be Iost to provide this area. The number of the houses that would be lost would be less than the proposed project. 6.5.2 Environmentallmpacts Implementation of this alternative would reduce the land use impact because it would result in the loss of fewer homes. This would reduce the number of historic homes that would be lost by approximately 50 percent. Traffic, air quality, noise and other related 6-4 ~fsan ff Elementary Schaof Draft Envfranmentaf lmpact Report December, 20D7 impacts would be expected to be at the same intensity as the proposed project. There may also be operational conflicts in the operation of the school at the same location this may include traffic issues associated with picking up and dropping off students from both schools. For these reasons, the alternative was rejected. 6.6 Expansion of Existing School Sites 6.6.1 Descr"rption of Alternative This alternative would involve the expansion of the existing school sites in the area to accommodate additional student capacity that would be provided by the new Wilson II Elementary School project. This would be in addition to other planned expansion in the area. 6.6.2 Enviranmentallmpact Implementation of this alternative wo~~ld result in incremental impacts associated with traffic and noise at other existing school sites. Depending upon the site, there may also be requirements for expansion of individual school sites. There may also not be state funding available for this type of project. These schools may not meet California Department of Education requirements and may require new site designs and new budgeting This alternative would not provide more school capacity within the Wilson attendance area and would also increase the need for busing. For these reasons, the alternative was rejected. 6.? SMA1l...I..ER P14®JEGT SITE 6.7.1 Description of Alternative This alternative would involve the construction of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School at the same location but reduced in size from 8 to 6 acres. This alternative could result in the retention of 5 to 10 homes depending on the design of the new site_ The school would not meet its requirements for playground land. It is possible that the shortfall could be accommodated by co-locating same playground activities at Arrovwiew Intermediate School. 6.7.2 Environmental lmpact This alternative would have similar impacts to the proposed project, but the land use impacts would be less intense, but still significant and unavoidable. The change in size may also require that the SBCUSD undergo a new approval and funding process with the California Department of Education. A smaller school site may also create significant impacts to area circulation through the creation of dead end streets or cul-de- sacs because same of the streets that would be stubbed off to serve the retained houses rather than being fully abandoned. Far -these resansf the alternative was rejected. B-5 Wilson 11 Elementary School Draft E'nvironmenta! Impact Report December, 2007 6.9 Chances in Sch®®I Operafii®ns 6.8.1 Description. of Alternative This alternative would involve the changes in operations of the elementary schools within SBCUSD to accommodate the anticipated enrollment of the Wilson ll Elementary School without construction of new facilities. This includes year round operations, increased busing and use of portable buildings. 6.8.2 Environmentallmpact This alternative would reduce the impacts of the new school and be similar in impacts to the No Project Alternative. Many of the operations described above are currently implemented to one degree or another by the SBCUSD. Additional changes in operation may not be feasible on lang~term basis. fi.9 Cc~rnparis®n ®f Feasible A[fiernatives and Idenfiificafi'r®n ®f fihe Envir®nmentally Superior e4lternative CEQA requires that an Environmentally Superior Alternative be identified. The Na Project Alternative would be the Environmentally Superior Alternative in that the impacts associated with the proposed project and other alternatives will not occur. This alternative would not result in the SBCUSD meeting its project objectives in providing another school within the Wilson Elementary School Attendance Area. Because the Na Project Alternative was considered to be envirantnentally superior, CEQA requires that another environmentally preferable alternative be identified. Each of the other alternatives identified would result in significant environmental impacts or not meet the project objectives. Of those alternatives, co--locating the new elementary school with the Arrrowview Middle 5chaoi would be environmentally preferable since this alternative would provide a project site within the desired location within the attendance area and would reduce the number of historic harnes that would be lost by school construction. The new site would need to be reviewed by and funded through the California Department of Education and it. is questionable whether approval would be granted. It is likely that additional land would be required and some homes would be lost with this alternative. Evan with these issues, the alternative is considered preferable to the other alternatives because it would place a school in the proper area of the attendance area far Wilson Elementary School and would result in Tess impact to the existing historically significant Names. ~-6 Wilson 1! Elemenfary Schaal Drat Envrranmental Impact Report December, 2007 ~" ~~NC3 TERM ~IVIF'LIC~T'~®NS ®F' `THE PR®JECT 7,°I Significant and Unaryoidable Environmental Effects Implementation of the proposed project will result in the following significant and unavoidable environmental effects: ® Inconsistency with the City of San Bernardi General Plan through the loss of Names within neighborhood that is approximately 50 years old,. ?.2 Grooavth Inducing Impacts of Proposed Project CEQA requires that the EIR addresses ways that the proposed project would foster population or economic growth, foster the development of additional housing ar remove other obstacles to growth. The proposed project will remove X10 homes and develop a new elementary school This new school will provide additional capacity that is currently needed and will relieve overcrowding afi existing schools and will allow pupils to attend their neighborhood school. Since the school capacity is not normally a major obstacle to growth such as water, sewer or roadway systems, the construction of the new school is not considered highly growth inducing. The proposed project will require 40 replacement houses. I~t is anticipated that the replacement houses will come from the existing pausing stock in the San Bernardino area and will not require construction of new houses. 7.3 Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would be Involved in the Proposed Project Should it be Implemented Implementation afi the proposed ,project will result in the loss ofi 4Q residential units. Twenty-nine of these units are considered historically significant and the loss ofi these units would lae considered irreversible. The proposed project will also result in the irreversible loss of several residential streets that will be abandoned as part of the proposed project. The proposed project will also use concrete, other construction material and energy in its construction. This use will also be considered irreversible. The new Schaal will result in new structures including buildings, foundations, hardscape and similar features. These features will stay in place and be considered an irreversible environmental change since they will be at that location for the foreseeable future. 7-1 Wilson 1I 'iementary School Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 20(17' TH[S PAGE 1S INTENTIONALLY LEST BLAND 7-2 Wilson I1 ,Elementary School Draft 'nvr"ronmental Impact Report December 2D~7 ~ ~R~PAR~R~ ~N~ ®~GI~1NZ~`Td®N~ ~IV® P~R~®N~ ®~~u~~~® ~.1 6~eport Preparers Kleinfiefder John F. Westermeier Project Manager Michael Langley Senior Analyst Sean Kinghorn Senior Planner Erie Monzon Environmental Planner Andrea Urbas Architectural Historian Bryan Deese Environmental Analyst Michele Goldman Word Processing Lolita Bredvold Word Processing Dean Fahrney DraftinglGraphics Urban Crossroads Carlton Waters, P.E. Supervising Principal Min Zhou, P.E. Project Manager San Bernardino Dit Unified School .District Michael Plunkett, AIA Preconstruction Manager Jorge Mendez, AIA Associate Project Manager Tim Deland Facilities Analyst Wael Elatar Facilities Administrator 8-1 Wilson 1! Eferrrentary Schppf Draft Fnvirpnmenta! Impact Report December 207 ~.2 Organiza~i®n ane! Persons ~®nsultet~ Valerie C. Ross, Deputy Director/City Planner, City of San Berrtardir~o Rabert Eisenbeisz, P.E., City of San Bernardino 8-2 Wilson 1i E'lementary School Draft 'nviranmental Impact Repotf December, 2007 9. REFEFiEN~E~ California Department of Transportation. 2002_ California airport land use planning handbook. January. Sacramento, GA. California Department of Transportation 1998. Traffic Noise Supplement, A Technical Supplement to fhe Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. October. Sacramento, CA. Califomia Department of Transportation 2002. Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. Sacramento, CA. California Integrated Waste Management Board. 2007. Estimated solid waste generation rates for institutions. htt JI222.ciwmb.ca. ©vNVasteCharMlasteGenRatesllnstitution.htm. Accessed February 19, 2007. City of Los Angeles. 2006. Las Angeles CF'QA Thresholds Guide. Los Angeles, California. City of San Bernardino. 2005_ San Semardino General Plan. November 1. Egan, M. David. 1972. Concepts in architectural acoustics_ 1972, New York, NY. Los Angeles Unified School District. 2004. New School Construction Program Draft EIR. March. Los Angeles, CA. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2006. Final-Methodology fo Calculafe Parficulafe Mater (PM) 2.5 and PM 2.5 Significance Thresholds. October_ Diamond Bar, CA. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2007a_ Air Quality Management Plans_ http:l/www.agmd.govlagmplAQMPintro.htm. Accessed February 2fi-27, 2007. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2007b. 2007 Air Quality Management Plan. Draft. http:/Iwww.agmd.gc~v/agmp/07agmp/07AQMP.htmLAccessed February 26-27, 2007. South Goast Air Quality Management District. 2007c. Rule 403. Rule 403, Fugitive Dust. htt :Ilwww.a md. ovlrules/re Ire 04/r403. df. Accessed February 27, 2007. State of California, Gnvernar's Office of Planning and Research. 2003. State of California General Plan Guidelines. Sacramento, CA. S-1 Wilson Elementary Schoo! Draft Enviranmentai Impact Report December, 2007 United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1985. The noise guidebook : a reference document for implementing the Department of Nausing and Urban Development's noise policy. Washingtan, D.C. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1971. Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Hame Appliances. Washingtan, D.C. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. May. Washingtan, D.C. URS 2005a Notice of Intent to Adapt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Wilson II Elementary Schaal. URS. 2005b. Noise Study for San Bernardino Unified School District, Wilson II Schaal Site. March 2005. Urban Crossroads. 2007. Vl/ilsan fl Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis. March 13. Irvine, C.A Western Regional Climate Center. 2007_ San Bernardino, California, Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary. http:flwww.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-binlcliRECtM.pl?ca7723. Accessed February 27, 2007. s-z TECHNICAL APPENDICES ®RAFT EN'I/IRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 1=0R THE CONSTRUCTI®N O1= VEIILSON I1 ELEMENTARY' SCHOOL GITY OF SAN BERNARDINO SCH 20051'1 ~ 105 SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIE© SCHOOL DISTRICT 777 North F Street San Bernardino, CA 9241Q Contact: Jorge Mendez Project Manager 9Q9-381-1238 ext. 4193 Prepared by Kleint'elder, Inc. 1220 Research Drive, Suite B Redlands, CA 92374 Contact: John Vllestermeier 909-376-4617 December 2007 Wilson !1 Elementary School Draft Environmental fmpacf Reporf December, 2007 I.~IST OF APPENDICES Appendix A ~- Notice of PreparationlScoping Meeting Responses Appendix B -- Traffic Report and Par6cing Study Appendix C -- Cultural Result Study Appendix D -- Alr Quality Il~odeling Results 1-1 Wilson Elementary School ©raft Environments! Impact Repart ©ecember, 2007 ~ppe~C~M~C ,~ (Notice of Preparativnl~cvping t~ieeting iZe~pvn~es D~v~~,arn~~rrr S~~v~c~s DEPAI2TM~N'I' ~,~ z~ ~ 7 h ~ . ~y ~ ~ ~ ,a ~ ; ~~.~~.~,~ ~ 300 North "D" Street ~ San Bernardino • CA 92415-0001 b~~' Planning & Building 909.384.5457 ~ Fax: 909.384.5080 ® C~ Public WorkslEngrneering 9UQ.384.5111 • Fax: 904.384.5155 ~,n ~i~~°1~~~~IIiQ www.sbcity.org $~~ . December 1 h, 2005 Wael Elatar Facilities Administrator San Ben~ardino City Unified School District 7'77 N. "F'" Street San Ben~ardinn, CA 92410 RE: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Tmpact Repnrl for the proposed Wilson II Elementary School Dear Mr. Elatar: Thank yoiz for the opportunity to review the Notice of l-'reparation (NOT'} of a Draff Environmental Impact Report (DETR) for the proposed Wilson II Elenrzentary School. However, I azn a bit confused. The NQI' includes tlae Initial Study that was prepared and circulated between August 11, 2005 and September 10, 2005, yet none of the environmental topics were checked as having a "patez~tially significant impact,,, but an EIR is being prepared. Tt is not clear why the San Bernardino City Unified School District would prepare a DEIR if there were no potentially significant impacts. Notwithstanding that, the City agrees that a DEIR is appropriate, as outlined in any letter dated September 9, 2005. I have attached a copy for your convenience. The N4P does not reference a scoping meeting as outlined in Section 21080.4 of the Public Resources Code, but we would be happy to meet with you to clarify any of otzr cozxtrnets. CJpon receipt of the DEIR, we will review it to ensure that all of the City's issues have been. adequately addressed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Valerie C. Doss Deputy Director/City T'laz~a~er ~~~I~ ~ ~-.°S_~.V i [P8. 551 Wilson II N©F December 16, 20D5 Fage 2 of 2 Attaclunents: September 9, 2005 letter cc: Mayor Judith. Vanes and z~embers of the Common Cotn~cil James Penman, City Attorney Fred Wilson, City Administrator Jarries 1~`unlc, Director, Develapmenfi Services Marianne Milligan, Seniar Deputy City Attarriey c' ,- ~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I?EPAIiTMIrNT _-., ~ sue" ~ ~ ~ r CtiF.~ ~~' • r~•w.~.•••-`"~~ ' 300 North "D" Street' San Bernardino • CA 92418-0001 w Planning & Building 909.3845057 • Fax: 909.384,5080 p~~,~~~ Public Works/Engineering 909.3$4.51I1 • Fax: 9093&3.5155 www.sbcity.org SM September 9, 2005 Mr. Wael Elatar, Facilities Administrator San Bernardino City Unified School District 777 North "F" Street San Bernardino, CA 42410 RE: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (DMND) far the praposed Wilson II Elementary School Dear Mr. Elatar: Thank you for providing notice and an opportunity to comment on the above referenced DMND to the City of San Bernardino, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA}. As the agency responsible for providing utilities, public services and infrastructure to support the proposed project, the City would expect to rely on the DMND prepared by the District for future permits or actions the City may be required to take as a Responsible Agency under CEQA. The City has several concerns about the adequacy of the DMND which we would urge the District to address and correct prior to taking any action on tlzs proposed Wilson lI Elementary Schaal project. Project Description: The proposed DMND contains an Initial Study that evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with land acquisition, abandonment of city streets, relocation of city residents and developrrzent of the praposed Wilson II Elementary School in the 8.5-acre area bounded by 2fi`~' Street to the north, "F" Street to the west, "G" Street to the east and Arrowview Middle School to the south. There are numerous discrepancies in the DMND concerning the number of students that would attend the proposed Wilson II Elementary School. The Notice of Availability and the project description on Page 2 of the DMND indicate that the school will be designed to accomrrzodate 900 students. However, the Traffic Analysis {Appendix F), the Air Quality Analysis (Appendix B), the Noise Analysis (Appendix D} and the corresponding sections of the DMND are all based on the assumption that the school will accommodate only 600 students. It appears, therefore, that the impacts of traffic and related noise and air emissions have been underestimated throughout the DMNT7. Transportation/Traffze: The City Public Works Traffic Division staff has reviewed the Traffic Analysis {Appendix F) and Section XV: Transportatian/Traffic of the DMNID_ The analysis is incomplete, contains erroneous discussion of the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan, does not address off- street parking demand and is apparently based on incorrect trip generation data. Please see the attached memo dated September R, 2005 ffom Robert Eisenbeisz, Senior Civi] Engineer far a detailed discussion of the traffic analysis, and revise the DMND accordingly. Wilson iI Elementary School L7MND Comment Letter September 9, 2~d5 Page 2 of 4 Air uali :The Air Quality Analysis in the DMND (Appendix B) identifies residents surrounding the project site, students at Arrowview Middle School and future students of Wilson II Elementary School as sensitive receptors of air emissions. Therefore, the analysis should be revised to include a health risk assessment of toxic air emissions from operation afdiesel-powered school buses, including on-site idling. Any revisions to trip generation data made in response to Goaxzments an the traffic analysis should also be incorporated in the air quality model input to update the air quality analysis accordingly. Hydrology and Water Quality: The DMND references compliance National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System requirements through the State Water Quality Control Board. Tt should be clarified that the Board has placed Water Quality Management Plan compliance on the City to enforce under our permit. The County of San Bernardino is a permittee, and the City of San Bernardino is a subpGrmittce under the County. Therefore, the City is a responsible agency under CEQA. The City requires an approved WQMP prior to issuance of a grading permit. Noise: Upon revisian/carnpletion of the traffic analysis, as requested, the noise analysis should also be revised, ar reGan#irmed, accordingly. in addition, the DMND does not discuss the disposal/rerraoval of demolition debris. Ora-site recycling {i.e. crushing, grinding, etc.) does create noise and air quality impacts. 'T'his needs to be clarified, and further analysis may be warranted. Mitigation measure #6 states that operations shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to $:DO p.m. far construction, grading, and excavation activities. The City of San Bernardino believes this measure is not adequate is proposed. Tn our experience, workers arriving at the site and the delivery of construction materiais and equipment often occur before and after the hours you have noted, resulting in noise impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. Po ulation/Housin :Since the discussion of displacement of residents from existing housing in the DMND refers to mitigation presented in the Land Use aiad Planning Section, our comments on this issue are included with comments on the T.and Use and Planning analysis. However, the City found no analysis to support the conclusion that the displacement of people would not require the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Land Use/Plannin~: The City disputes the conclusion in the DMND that Land UselPlanning impacts of the proposed project are less than significant. More specifically, contrary to the findings presented in the Initial Study component of the DMND, the following impacts are potentially significant: ' Caraflict with the City General Plan -The DMND cites several General Plan policies that encourage development of public facilities needed to serve the population of the City, including schools. General Plan policies do encourage development of schools and cooperation with the school district to plan for new schaoi sites. However, there are also policies in the General Plan that stress the importance of compatibility with surroundtng land uses and preservation of existing stable, cohesive neighborhoods. 4n August 1, 2005, the Mayor and Common Council determined that development of Wilson ii Elementary School at the site currently proposed by the District would net be consistent with the City General Plan. A record of this determination, including a detailed report an General Plan policy GOnfIaGYS, as attached. Wilse~n Il llementary School DMNI3 Cpzxument Letter Septerrzber 9, 20QS Page 3 pf 4 The DMD discussion states that the City's General Plan noted that the neighborhood to the immediate north was identified with at least ten "deteriorated" properties. I would like to clarify that that information was from a land use survey that was completed in 1986 and should not be relied upon far this discussion. o Physical division of an established cornrnzznity -The DMNI7 acknowledges that the proposed project would "physically alter the established community". However, it states with na substantiation that the alteration would not constitute a division. The attached August 1, 2(305 report to the Mayor and Common Council contains a dtseussian of potential impacts to thr: neighborhood where the District proposes to demolish 40 homes to construct Wilson II Elementary School. The neighborhood that would be affected by the proposal is particularly well maintained, improving and quite stable, with aver $0% owner occupancy*. Demolition of this block of homes would eliminate a model neighborhood and replace it with a school site that would he a physical barrier, detrimental to the integrity of the surrounding conununity. A memorandum from Garrett W. Zimmon, City of San I3ernardina Chief or Police is included in the August 1, 2005 report to the Mayor and Common Council. It cites numerous concerns about the site proposed far development of Wilson II Elementary School, including impacts to local circulation through the existing neighborhood and the potential for negative influences nn young children at the particular location proposed by the District. ~ (Nate: ~Ippertdix C of the DMND underestimates owner occupancy by assuming that any property with an owner address other than the site address is a rental. Property held irr trust, 7vith tax bills mailed to a trustee may be owner-occupied, as evidenced by a homeowner's tax exernption.J Public Services: The DMND states that the average Police response tinne to the area is approximately six minutes, then concludes that no impacts are anticipated. Average response tune is not a relevant factor when describing Police Department activities. Ct assumes that the Police officers are sitting in the Northern District Community Service Office "waiting" on calls for service. In reality, the City's Police officers are randomly patrolling in established geographic areas. As noted previously, the memorandurrt from the Chief of Police raises public safety concerns that could impact the Police Department. To cnnelude that the proposed school will not result in an increased demand on Police Department resources is erroneous. The Recreation discussion states that the proposed school will include "a turf playfield and hardcaurt, and would contribute to the park systerri for after school activities." The turf playfield runs from 24'~ Street to 26`x' Street, parallel to "F" Street. It seems highly probable that parents will park along "I~" Street for easy access to the playfield, yet there is no analysis of potential impacts in the Transportation/Traffic arPublic Services sections of the DMNU. Because "P" Street currently deadends at Arrowview Middle School, we have an existing awkward situation. Vacating 25`" Street cnuld compromise public health and safety. Utilities and Service Systems: The DMND cnncludes that there will be no impacts or less than significant impacts, with no supporting analysis or discussion. In particular, it is not clear to the City how the determination was made that the existing infrastructure is adequate to support the prnposed school. As acknowledged earlier in the DMND, the proposed siters in an older area of the City, which generally indicates that the infrastructure is of a tike age. Although the DMND does not address sidewalks, they are part of our infrastructure and sholtld be analyzed in the environmental document. Typically, the state only pays for limited infrastructure improvements, leaving local jurisdictions to fund and complete the remaining improvements. Since this area contains a stable residential neighborhood, the City has not Wilson lT l;lementary School DMND Comment Letter September 9, 2005 Page 4 of 4 included any infrastructure improvements in its Capital Improvement Plan. If infrastructure irnpravements are later identified, this will 'be a signiftcant impact to the City of San Bernardino. In conclusion, the potential significance of land use impacts warrant preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for a complete impact analysis and a more thorough evaluation of potential mitigation measures and project alterrtatives, including an alternative site analysis. The City would urge the District to propose an alternative site that would not have significant impacts on an existing neighborhood, so that the City could support a Mitigated Negative Declaration. If the District continues to pursue the site adjacent to Arrowview Middle Schaal, then at a minimum, the technical studies mentioned in this letter should be revised, the Initial Study should be revised as necessary to incorporate corrected teclurical data, and the entire revised document should be recirculated to allow rrieaningful review by responsible agencies pursuant to Section 15073.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, pursuant to Section 15064(f){ 1) of the CEQA Guidelines, the revised Initial Study should conclude that an Environmental Impact Report is rec{uired. Thank you again for the opportunity to review and comment on the DMND. Please submit a revised CEQA document for, further review prior to taking action on the proposed Wilson II Elementary School. If the District is still willing to consider alternative sites, City staff would be happy to assist with site selection and compilation of data for the CEQA analysis. Because of our concerns with the enviranrnental impacts from the proposed Wilson II Elementary School, we were not able to devote resources to complete our review of the environmental documents for the proposed Alessandro II and Burbanlt II Elementary Schools. However, we did observe that the DMNDs were similar in many respects to the DMND far the proposed Wilson Il Elementary School in that there were conclusions of nn impact without supporting azlal-ysis in the areas of Project Description, Transportation/Traffic, Air Quality, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Population/I~lousing, Land Use/I'lanning, Public Services, and Utilities and Service Systems. Sincerely, Valerie G. Ross _ City Planner/Deputy Director Attachments: September 9, 205 Memo froth Robert Eisenbeisz RE: Wilson II DMND Record of August 1, 2f105 Determination by Mayor and Common Council Cc: Robert Eisenbeisz, Senior Civil Engineer Marianne Milligan, Sr. Deputy City Attorney C.I~I'~ ®~' ~.A.~ ~EAINC) ~ntero~~ce ~Cemorandum To: Terri Rahhal, Principal Planner From: Robert Eisenbeisz, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: Review of Wilson 11 Elementary 5cttooi Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Date: September 9, 2005 Copies: Tirr~ Darter, Michael Grubbs, Valerie Ross, Terri Rahhal, File No.l3.~17 We have completed our review of the traffic portion of the Revised Initial Study (IS), dated August ll, 2005, and the attached Traffic Analysis (Appendix F), dated March 14, 2005 prepared by URS, relative to the development of an elementary schoal on 8.S acres adjacent to the north edge of Arrowview Middle Schaal. The project proposes to convert ~0 single-family dwelling units, one vacant lot and two public streets into an elementary schoal. We have the following comrr~ents. ® The discussion under Section XV Transpartation/Traffic, subsection a) on Page 36 of the Initial Study (TS) indicates that the Level of Service (LOS) standard for the CMP is "E". The City of San Bernardino has established the minimuzxz acceptable LOS standard to be "D" at intersections and "C" far roadway segments, in conformance with the City of San $ernardino General Plan and as reported to San Bernardino Associated Gavernfnents (SANBAG). ~ The IS cozrtains unsupported statements artcl conclusions regaz-ding traffic impacts associated with the project. The "traffic Analysis attached as Appendix F does not provide any existing traffic volume count data, future traffic valurrie forecast data, or level of service calculations far area roadways and intersections. Without the supporting information, the analysis does not satisfy the requirements of CEQA, the City of San Bernardino and/or SANBAG. Staff is unable to canfirn-~ or dispute the level of service results presented in the document in Appendix T? because the supporting data and calculations were not included in the document as required by the City and the CMP. s One statement in the IS indicates that there will be significant impacts associated with the project based upon the statement: "Neither the removal of existing streets nor the aperatioz~s of the Wilson II Elementary Schaal will taave an insignificant impact an the level of service in the I'raject area..." We assume that the statement meant to say that there will not be significant impacts, but it has been misstated using a do~~ble negative. Assuming it was meant to indicate that there will be no significant impacts, the referenced Figure 10, Ti°uf~c Arrulysis Summary, and Attachment A, Traffic Analysis Correspondence do not adequately substantiate this finding. The only information that bath Figure IO and Attachment A convey is the proximity and distance of the project relative to area freeways and that the project is not located within 500 feet afany "Freeway or other busy traffic corridors." Under CEQA, the City of San Bernardino guidelines, and SANBAG TIA guidelines, this would not provide a sufficient basis to conclude that the project will not have a significant irr~pact on levels of service in the area. Neither Figure 10 nor Attachment A provide any information about traffic impacts or levels of service. No factual basis has been provided Approved MOTION: That said resolution be adapted. Adopted 2005-259 12. Resolution of the Mayor and Con~on Council of the Gity of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of a Professional Services Agreement between Mundell, C3dlurrz & Haws and the City of San. Bernardino to represent the City in the case of Kinzherlyn Hearns v. City of San Bernardino. (See Attached) Approved MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. Adopted 2005-260 13. Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of a revised Professional Serviee~ Agreement between Gresharu, Savage, Nolan & Tilden and the City of San Bernardino to represent the City in the case of Deanna Helena Petrovna Adams v. City of San Bernarclina, a California Municipality, San Bernardino Palley Municipal Water District, a Public Entity -San Bernardino Superior Court Gase No. SCVSS 126708 and repealing Resolution No. 2005-i54. (Uacuanent and ResalutiAn not available at time of printing.) Approved MOTION. That said resolution be adapted. Adopted 2005-265 14. Resolution of the Mayor and Gorr~ncron Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of a revised Professional Services Agreerraent between Greslzarri, Savage, Nolan & Tilden anal the City ofSan Bernardino to represent the City in the case of Ghassan N. Abdullah, Lucy Ramerq, Steve [felaz, Felix Willa, Rosemary Lane, Diane Hayes, Nathaniel Grant, Kim Gagdstein, Rsgina Flares, S M. Alvarez v. City of San Bernardino, a California Municipality, San Bernardino Palley Municipal Water .District, a Public Entity -San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 126706 and repealing Resolution No. 2005-155. (Document and Resolution not available at time of printing.) {,Items Continued on Next Page) 14. Continued. Approved MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. Adopted 2005-269 9 0$101 /2005 XXXXXXX~:~XXXXX~XXXXXX~XXXX~~XX,XXXXXXX~CXXX~XX~XXX X City Clerk 1S. Review and take action regarding the need for continuing in effect tlae local emergency caused by the Old Waterrr~an Canyon Fire pursuant to Government Code Section 8b34 (c)(1). . Approved MOTION: That the Mayor and Common Council can~rxn the need. for continuing in effect the local emergency caused by the Old Waterman Canyon Fire. :XX~.XXXXX.XXXXXX~XXXXXX.XX~!;:~XXX~X~XXXXXX~XXXX X 16. Item Deleted. Devela rnent Services 17. Resolution of the Mayor and Can~xrtan Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the Mayor to execute an Agreement far Professional Transportation Modeling Services with Srinivasa S. Bhat. (See Attached} (No net cost to the City -Cast for services to be reimbursed by the Agencies and 1Developers requesting modeling services.} {Resolution not available at time of printing.} All Wards Approved MOT14N: That said resolution be adopted; and that the Director of Finance be authorized to issue a purchase order in the amount of $50,000 for requested modeling services in FY 2005/Ob per the proposed agreement and to authorize the Director of Finance to pay an additional $17,100 to the consultant far services rendered in FY 2004145, bringing the total authorized amount in FY 2004105 to $41,895. Adopted 2005-2G1 18. Resolution of the City of San Bernardino approving an agreemcnt with Frank R. Cortez and Irene D. Cortez, relating to property at 3008 Broadrttoar Boulevard, San Bernardino 92404-231 ~ (Waterman Avenue and 30`~ Street}. {See Attached) (Cast to khe City -- $73,150 [24,950 from ET3A, and $49,000 fronn. the Gas Tax fund.) (Resolution not available at time of printing.} Ward 7 (Tkem Continued on Nexk Page) 18. Continued. Approved ' MOTT©N: That said resolution be adapted; and that staff aslc the Cartezes to provide documentation that they are the current owners, to os~oi~zons Adopted 2045-270 19. Resolution of the City of San Berr~ardina declaring its intention to order the vacation of a portion of University Parkway, westerly of Narthpark Boulevard. (See Attached) (No cost to the City -- $1,200 fee paid by applicant.) (Resolution oat available at time of printing.) Ward S Approved MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. Adopted 2445-262 20. Authorization to proceed -proposed vacation of a portion of Garu~ett Parkway, formerly known as Campeau Drive, between Hallmark Parkway and Georgia Boulevard and plan approval. (See Attached} (No cost to the City -- $1,240 processing fee to be paid by EDA.) Ward 6 Approved MOTION: That the Director of Develaprnent Services and the City Clerk be authorized to proceed with the vacation of a portion of Gannett Parkway, formerly known as Campeau Drive, between Hallmark Parkway and Georgia Boulevard; and that Plan No. 10901, be approved. X.XXX7~.~XKXKX~XXX~!~X.XX~.~X7~7r:~X.XX XX~~~~r::~~~XXX 21. Resolution of the City of San Bernardino setting a public hearing relative to the formation of Underground Utility ~`~District No. 32, generally located along portions of Victoria Avenue. (See Attached) (No net cast to the City -- $730,D04 from Rule 20A funds, and $27'0,000 from the Public Improvement Fund.} Ward 4 No Action Taken N10TIOPl: That the Director of Development Services Director and the City Clerk be authorized to proceed with the formation of Underground Utility District No. 32, along portions of Victoria Avenue, north of Highland, pursuant to San Bernardino Municipal Code Section 13.26; and that said resolution be adopted. Approved IVIOTION: That the matter be continued to September 19, 2005. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX~CXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXXXXXXX?~XX X 22. Resolution of the City of San Bernardino establishing fair market value of certain real property located at the northeast corner of 2"d Street and Viaduct Boulevard, being a portion of real property commonly known as Assessor's Parcel Number 0138-263-02, relative to the extension of Giovanala Avenue. (See Attached) (Cost to the City -- $207,000 in AB 2928 Funds.) (1R.esolution not available at time of printing.} Ward 1 I 1 ~ D8I~112DD5 Appr©ved MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. Adopted. 2005-263 23. Resolution of the City of San Bernardino approving A,greerr~ent with the California Newspapers Partnership for deferral of sidewalk irnprove~nents on Georgia Boulevard. (See Attached) (N'o cost to the City.} (Resolution not available at time of printing.} Ward 6 Approved N,IOTI®N: That said resolution be adapted. Adopted 2005-271. XXXXXX%~XX~~~~'~i XXX.XXXXXX.XXXXXX.~.XXXXXXX~X~XXX~7~~~X 24. Authorization for the Director of Finance to exchange FY 2004/2005 AB 292$ Funds for FY 2004/2005 Gas Tax Funds far three-pavement rehabilitation projects. (See Attached.) Wards 1,3,5,6,7 No Action Taken MOTION: That the Mayor and Common Council authorize the Director of Finance to exchange $146,888 in FY 2004/2005 AB 2928 Funds far FY 2004/2005 Gas Tax Funds for three-pavement rehabilitation projects. Approved MOTION: That the matter be continued to August 15, 2005. X~.X~XXXXXX~XXXX~i; XX.XX~XXXXXXXXXXX7~~XXX~:.~X~.XXXXXX ~ 25. Reject all bids for cleaning sewer siphons at various locations (SWOS-13) per project Flan No. 113~40A and direct staff to revise the project and re-advertise. (See Attached} {N© cost to the City.) Wards 1.,Z&3 App~-aved MOTION: That the Mayor and Common Council reject all bids for cleaning sewer siphons at various locations (SW05-13) per project Plan No. 11340A and direct staff to revise the project and re-advertise. 26. Resolution of the City of San Bernardino amending Resolution. No. 655 entitled irz part, "A Resolution ...designating certain streets, or portions thereof as through highways ..." and establishing athree-way stag at Clae intersection of Crestview Avenue and lrighteenth Street. (See Attached} (Cast to the City - - $1,000 from tz nsiovzoo5 the General Fund.) (Resolution not available at tune of printing.) Ward 2 Approved MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. Adopted 2x05-264 Facilities Mana ement 27. Authorization to execu#e Change Order Na. Three to contract with Eberhardt Construction, loc., far changes in the scope of work at Fire Sta#ion #232. {See Attachedy (Cast to the City --- $59,273.$3 from the Fire Equipment Acquisition Fund.} Ward 5 Approved M:®TION: That the Director of Facilities Managerrtent be authorized to execute Change Order No. Three to the contract with Eberhardt Construction Iarac., for changes in the scope of work at lire Station #232 in the amount of $59,273.83. Fire 28. Resolution of the Mayor and Carrtrrton Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the City of San Bernardino Fire Department to extend the Agreement with the County of San Bernardino ~to provide fire protection and paramedic services to County unincorporated areas within the City of San Bernardino's sphere of influence frorrt rely 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. (See Attached} (Revenue to the City in FY 05106 -- $250,000.} {Resolu#ion not available at time of printing.) All Wards Approved 1VIGTION: That said resolution be adopted, with the caveat that. if a new higher rate is negotiated far future years, it will be retroactive to July 1, 2005. Adopted 2005-272 I'arlcs Recreation & Cnrn:ruuni Services 29. Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Sort Bernardino authorizing the Mayor or her designee to issue a purchase order to 5erviee Scope for landscape xxtaintenance service far Pioneer Memorial Cemetery, for a period of twelve {12} months in accordance with Bid Specifiea#ion F-O6-02. (See Attached} (Cyst to the City -- $44,796 from the Cemetery Fund.) Ward 1 Approved t ~ os~ov2oo5 MOTION: That said resalutian be adapted; and that the Director of Finance be authorized to arnend the l~X OS/06 adapted Cernetery budget and appropriate $1,800 from the Cemetery fund balance to Account No. 105-441 5506 (Landscape Contracts). Adopted 2005-265 30. Resolut"rnn of the Mayor and Caznmon Council of the City of San Bernardino awarding a purchase order to Service Scope far park lawn rrzowing .services at seven (7} park locations for a period of twelve (12} months in accordance with Bid Specification F-06-03; Al Guhin Park, Anne Shirrells Park, Blair Park, nelmann Heights Park, Hudson Park, Littlefield/Shultis Park, and Spiecher Park. (See Attached) (Cast to the City -, $44,592 from various funds.) Wards 4,5,6,7 Approved 11~I01`ION. That Said resalutian be adopted. Adapted 2005M266 31. Resolution of the Mayor and Cozx~rnon Council of the City of San Bernardino awarding purchase orders far landscape and irrigation maintenance services to Service Scope for downtown facilities, parking lots, north site facilities, south site fac~ltt~e5, Carousel Mall, rnedians;`~Arrowhead Credit Union Park, Library . facilities, acrd Seccombe Lake Park; R.P. Landscape for central facilities; and W. Woad & Associates far San Bernardino Soccer Canr~plex fnr a period of tryvelve {12) months in accordance with Bid Specification F06-04 A, B, & C. (See Attached) {Cast to the City -- X320,727.$0 fronrt the General Fund.) Wards 4,5,6&7 Approved MOTION: That said resalutian be adapted. Adopted 2005-267 14 08fQ 1.12005 Police 32. Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of an Agreement between. the City of San Bernardino and SANBAG for the lease of office space located in the Santa Fe Depot at 1170 West 3~d Street. {See Attached} (Cost io the City -- $25,000 t'rorn tlae General Fund.) {Resolution not available at tinne o#'pri~ntiug} Ward 1 Approved MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. Adapted 2005-274 Public Services 33. Resalut'ran of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of a purchase order to Crest Chevrolet fora 2006 4WD Tahoe command vehicle to be utilized by the Hire Department. {fee Attached) {No cost to tTae City -- $59,777.68 #'ram Federal and State Prograurs Fund.} All Wards Approved MOTION: That said resolution be adopted. Adapted 2005-275 END OF CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC I-IEARTNGS Ilevelop~ment Services CONTINUED FROM.IULY_18,_2tl0_S TO SE HEARD AT 4:00 P.Mi . 34. Public hearing -resolution ordering vacation -proposed vacation of tlae east/west street lying between "D" Street and Stoddard Avenue. (New Staff Report Attached) {Ilackup material distributed on July S, 2005, Item No. 23; item continued to ,Tiny 18, 2005, Item No. 39.) 'Ward 7_ Resolution of the City of San Bernardino ordering the vacation of the east/west street lying between "D" Street and Stoddard Avenue {Plan Na 11416A). Mayor to open the hearing . Appravcd MOTION #l :That Motion #3 approved an rune 6, 2005, authorizing the Director of Development Services to prepare and submit a variance application to the Planning Commission relative to the proposed vacation of the eastlwest street lying between "D" Street and Stoddard. Avenue, be rescinded; ar~d 34. Continued. is osro~izoos Approved MOTION #2: That the public hearing be closed and the Findings of Fact, as set forth in the staff report, dated July 18, 2005, from Jaynes Funk, Director of Development Services, as to why portions of the east/vvast street lying between "D" Street and Stoddard Avenue, is no longer necessary for public street purposes, be adopted; and Approved MOTION #3: That said resolution be adapted. Adopted 2005-273 ENI~ OF P~TI3LIC I-IEARIN~S - STAFF REPORTS XX%XXXXXXXXXXX~:~~:~CXXXXXXX XXXXXX7~XXXXXXXX X 35. Resolution of the Mayor and Cornanon Council of the City of San Bernardino adopting the 2005/2006 through 2409/2010 Capital Improvement Program. {I~ocament and Resolution not available at time of printing.] No Aetio~ Taken MOTION: That said resolution be adapted; and that the Director of Finance be authorized to arnerzd the FY 2005/2446 budget to incorporate the completed FY 2445/2006 Capital Impravernent Program {CIl') into the Final FY 2005/2046 Budget as documented on the attached spreadsheets. _ Approved MOTION: That the matter be continued to August 15, 2005. ~~XXXXX~~:~~:X.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XX7s;~~~X~XX.XX~XXXXXXXXX X i6 ogrot~aoa5 X~CXXXXX.~X~XXX%XXX%X~XX~X~~X:~~X~:~XXX~:X.~~r;~X:XXXXX X 3b_ Resolution of the City of San Ben-~ardinn adapting the Five-year Capital Improvement Program {2005-2010) for Measure "I" local expenditures. {See Attached} (No cost to the City for this action.) (Resolution not available at tirt~e of printing.) All Wards Approved MOTION: That the :matter be continued to August 1 S, 2005. X~:XXXXXXX.XXX.XXX~;~XX.XX ~XX~X.~C.XXX~CXX.X~CXXXXXX 37. Findings of consistency with the General Plan Conformity far Monterey II, Alessandro II, Burbank II, and Wilson II Elementary Schools far San Bemardizzo City Unified School District. (Docurrtent not available at time of printing.) Approved MEJTION #I: That the Mayor and Common Council make the findings that Manterey II Elementary School is consistent with the CCeneral Plan, and Approved, MOTION #2: That the Mayor and Cotmnon Council make the findings that Alessandro I.T Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan; and Approved MO'T'ION i~3: That the Mayor antl~ Common Council make the Endings that Burbank II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan; and Approved MOTION #4: That the Mayor and Common Council make the findings that Wilson II Elementary School is not consistent with the General Plan. ']END OF STAFF REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ~:~?~XXXX~~X~i:~~:1~X.XXX~.XX.X~iX X.XXXXXXX.Z~~S:XXXXXXXXX~CXXX~ X CONTINUED FROM JULY_18,_2005 TO BE BEARD AT 5:001P.M. R38. Public_ _ hearing - Disposition and Development Agreement - TELACU Development, LI.C (40€'' Street Redevelopment Project Area). (Item continued from .Iuly I8, 20115, Item No. IZ42, no backup material was distribrxted on July ~s, zoos.) I7 D8lDi/2D05 (l<tem Continued o~u Next Page) R38. Continued. A. Resolution of the Mayor and Carn~non Council of the City of San Bernardino approving the 2005 49th Street Single Family Residential Disposition and Development Agreement by and between. the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino ("Agency"} and TELACU Development, LLC ("Developer") (TELACU 49th Street New Harnes Project - 40th Street Redevelopment Project Area) (Resolution not available at time of printing.) B. Resolution of the Community Development Commission of tl~e City of San Bernardino approving and authorizing the Executive Director to execute the 2005 49th Street Single Family Residential Disposition and Developrn.ent Agreerr~ent by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino ("Agency"} and TELACU Development, LLC {"Developer") (TELACU 49`h Street New Hozn.es Project - 40th Street Redevelopment Project Area.} (Resolution not available at time oi' printing.) Mayor to open the hearing . Approved MOTiC)N: That the matter be continued to September 6, 2005. XXXXXX~XXX~~XXX~:~~.X.XXX~X.X~Su~~XXXX~iX~;XXXXXXXX.XXXKXXX X XXXXX.XX?CXXX.XXXXXXXXXX.X.XX7~~XX~XXXXXZaCXXX~XXXXXXXXXX X Recommended fora royal at the Redevelo meat Committee meetin on Jul 19 2005 ~- Committee Members Present: Estrada and McGinnis TO BE HEARID AT 5:00 P.M. R39. Public hearing -~ 2005 Disposition and Development Agreement with Watson- VVestridge, LLC - 143.72 acre residential development located north of Foothill Drive and east of Steriirig Avenue. (L~acument not available at time of printing.) A. Resolution of the Mayor and Co~nnnan Council of the City of San Bernardino approving that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between the City of San Bernardino ("City'°) and the Redevelaprnent Agency of the City of Sari Bernardino ("Agency") relating to the sale of ...City property located north of 1~aathill Drive, east of Sterling Avenue (135.60 ao"res APN 0155-361-25} in the City of San Bernardino. (Resolution not available at time of printing.} 18 O8/0 k 12005 (Item Continued fln Next Page) R39. Continued. B. Resolutian of the Mayor and Con~rnon Council of the City of San Bernardino approving the 2005 Disposition and Development Agree~rtent ("DDA") by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino ("Agency"} ar~d Watson-Westridge, LLC ("Developer") City and Agency property located north of Foothill Drive, east of Sterling Avenue (APN 0155-361-25, 0155-381-I 1 & 45 - 143.72 acres in the City of San Bernardino ("Froperty") and making certain Findings thereto related to the development of the property. (lEtesolution not available at tune of printing.) C. Resolutian. of the Camxxtunity Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino approving that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between the City of San Bearn:ardina ("City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino ("Agency") relating to the sale of City property located earth of Foothill Drive, east of Sterling Avenue (135.60 acres APN 0155-361-25) in the City of San Bernardino. (Resolution not available at tinne of printing.) D. Resolutian of the Cornmut~ity Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino approving _ the 2005 Disposition anal Develaptnent Agreement ("DDA") by and `between the Redevelopfnent Agency of the . City of San Bernardino ("Agericy") and Watson-Westridge, LLC ("Developer") and authorizing the Agency Executive Director to execute said DDA relating to the sale and development of certain City and Agency property located north of Foothill Drive, east of Sterling Avenue (APN 0155-3fi1-25, 0155-381-1 I & 45 - 143.72 acres in the. City of San Bernardino) ("Property") and making certain bndings thereto related to the development of the property. (Resolution not available a# time of printing.) Mayor to open floe fearing . Approved MOTION: That the matter be continued to August 15, 2005. X~;XXXXXXX~XXXX.XXXXXXXXXX~~~~~X.XX~S:~K~~.XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX X t9 os~ol~zoas (SAN I3ERNARDIN® CITE' HOUSII~IG AUTHORiT~ R40. Resolution of the San Bernardino City I-lousing Authority making certain ~r~dings _ with respect to the use of certain land far development of a new single family home in the Meadowbroak Neighborhood Restoration Area and rescinding Housing Authority Resolution No. SBHA 2005-2 adapted May l6, 2005, (land located at 123 North Sierra Way, San Bernardino, California, Al?N 0135-292-35} in the Inland Valley Development Ageney (NDA} Redevelopment Project Area. (See Attached) Approved M®TIUN; That said resolution be adopted. Adopted SBI-IAI2045-4 2~ os~olrzaas MAYOR AND COMM®N C®UNCZL AND THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION A1oIT) THE SAN BERNARDINO CITY HOIISZNG AUTHC3R..][TY OF THE CITY ®F SAN ~ERNARDINO RECONVENE MEETING MONDAY, AUGUS'T' 1, 8005 - 6:00 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PLANNING ITEMS XXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXX X TO BE ITEARD AT G:00 P.M. 4l. Puhlie hearing -~ Development Code Amendment No. 04-04 to amend Deveiopmen.t Code Section 19.20.030(8), Table 20.01 fa allow school uses (which legally existed prior to November 1, 2004) in residential land use districts to have six foot high decorative front yard security fencing. (See Attached] (Na cast to tl~e City.) Ali Wards An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino rnadifying Chapter 19.20 (Property Development Standards), Section 19.20A30($), Table 20.01 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code (Development Code) related to heights cif .fences for schools (established prior to November 1, 2004) in Residential Land Use Districts. FIRS'lr' READING Mayor to open t3~e l~~aring - Appraveci MOTION: That the hearing be closed; and that said ordinance be laid aver far final adoption. Vote: Unanimous. XX~'`X~CXXXXXXXXX7~X~;XX.X~:~~:X:XXXX~s:XXXXX7ti~~XXXXXXXXX7~XXXX X ENrI OF PLANNING ITEIVIS z ~ a8~o vzoos 42. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: Athree-rriinute l~znxtatlOn Shall apply to each zrzernber of the public Who Wishes to address the Mayor and Cornrnon CounciUCozx~rnunity Development Cornmissian an a matter not on the agenda_ No member of the public shall be permitted to "share" hi5fl~er three minutes with any other member of the public. (Usually any items heard under this heading are referred to staff for further study, research, completion andlar future CounciUCornrnission action.) ~3. Adjournment. Consensus M®T1<ON: That the meeting he adjourned to 5:00 p.m., Monday, August 8, 2005, in the Economic Developaxaent Agency Boardroom, far a General Plan Warkshap. NOTE» The next joint regular meeting of the Mayor and Comrrton CauncilJCommunity Development Carnzx~issian is scheduled for I:30 p.rn,, Monday, August I5, 2005, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. "` 22 O8I01 /Z005 Page i of 4 CITY OF ~Alri B~RNAI2DI1~~-It~QU~~'I' FAR COUNCIL ACTI~~ Frosn: .larrzes G. Funit, Director Subject: Requests from the San Bernardino City Unified 1Dept: Development Services School District for determinations of consistency with the City General Plan for developrnent, of four proposed elementary school sites. )date: .1uly 27, 2005 MCC Date: August 1, 20Q5 Synapsis of Previous Council 1~ctian: None i~eeorntnenderd Il4otian: That the Mayor and Cornrrtan Council rt~ake the fallowing findings: That Monterey II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan That Alessandro II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan That Burbank lI Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan That 'Wilson li l~lernentary School is not- consistent with the General flan ~.t.+~~ _ ~Y arnes G. Funk _ r Contact person: Terri Rahhal, Priu~cipal Planner Phone: 384-5457 Supporting data attached: Staff Report `Ward{s}: 7 FUI~IllI~iG ]1tFQUtiE2EMEN7f`5. Arnnunt: NIA - Spurce: Acct. No. Acct. Descri lion Finance• Caur~cil Notes• .~.._- Agenda Item Nn. /' Page ~ nf4 CITY OF SAN BERNARI~IId4 - RIa UIi;ST FOR COUI`ICIL AC'I['ION STAFF REP©RT SUBJECT: Requests froze, the San Bernardino City Unified School District for detezrnir?ations of consistency with the City Genera! Plan for development of four proposed elementary school sites. Applicant. lE~epreserRtatives: San Bernardino City URS Group, Ixic. LSA Associates Uzaified School District 10723 Bell Court 20 Executive Park Ste. 200 777 N. "F" Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Irvine, CA 92614-4731 Sari Bernardino, CA 92410 909-380-4004 949-S53-C)fi6& 909-381-110(} TIACKCROIJNI?» Section Z 1151.2 of the Public Resources Code requires the governing beard of a schoot district to provide written notice to the Planning Corrzmission with jurisdiction prior to acquiring property for expansion or development of a schapl. Section fi5402 or the Gnvernznent Code requires the .Planning Agency to respond within 40 days to the school district with a report vn consistency of tl7e proposed school facility with its Genera! Plan. 1~ailure to respond within 40 days is deemed a finding of consistency. if the Planning Agency finds that the proposed facility is not consistent with the General Plan, the governing body of the school district may overrule the finding and carry out its program. _ In late .Tune (June 24 and ,Tune 24), the San Bernardino City Unified Schaal District (District) submitted requests for findings of consistency with [he City General Plan for four proposed. elementary school sites: Monterey II Elementary School, proposed on the north side of Ninth Street, approximately 540 ft. east ofTippeearzoe Avenge; Alessandro 11 Elementary School, proposed at the southwest corner of Baseline Street and Herrington Avenue; Burbank II Elementary School, proposed at the southeast cozx~er of Rialto Avenge and Allen Street; Wilson lI Elementary School, bounded by 26`x' Street oz~ the north, Arrowview Middle School on the south, "F" Street on the east and "G" Street on the west. Staff prepared reports and recommended findings to present to the Planning Commission an July 19, 2005. The staff reports to the Planning Caznznission (Exhibits 1-4) contain full analyses of applicable General. Plan policies and objectives. Three of the scl3ool sites are recomrrtended for findings of consistency with the General Plan, as substantiated in the Planzzirzg Commission staff reports. Development ~of Wilson lI )rlerrzentary School at the site proposed by the District would conflict with General Plan objectives 1.37 and 1.6, which cite the importance of carnpatibility Page 3 of4 with surrounding residential areas, maintaining the character of the eornznunity and not adversely impacting the quality of life of City residents. Staff recommends a finding that development of Wilson II Elementary Schaal would -not be consistent with the General Plan, rased on the following concerns about the proposed site: ® The proposal would break up a stable rteighborhoad with SO% awrter occupancy, a modal the City is striving to replicate in other areas. The proposal would require vacation of a segment of 2S'h Street, making 26`h Street the first available east-west street north of Highland Avenue, in a neighborhood where local circulation is already impeded by Arrawview Middle Scht~ol. m The subject neighborhood is already impacted by traffic related- to dropping off and picking up students at Arrowview Middle School. Addition of another school site at the prope~sed location would worsen these impacts. o The location of Arrawview Middle Schaal cart a rrta,#ar thoroughfare (Highland Avenue) increases the potential far outside influences an the middle school students, including exposure to gangs. The Police Department recommends against introducing elementary school students adjacent to this particular middle school (Exhibit 5). As lead agency for school site develapmertt under the California Envirotxrrtental Quality Act (CEQA}, the District is responsible for environmental analysis of the proposed actions of site acquisition and development. CEQA requires the lead agency to provide notice and an opportunity to review and comment nn the draft analysis to all responsible agencies which will have permitting authority in the future. Responsible agencies typically rely an the CEQA analysis of the lead agency far their perrr~itting actions. The City will have permitting authority for right-ol=way improvements and extension ar<d- conrtectian to City water and sewer services for all of the proposed school sites in question. Therefore the City is a responsible agency with a substantial interest in the CEQA analysis far the school sites. City staff became aware that the District had circulated Initial Studies and proposed Mitigated Negative Declarations for three of the school sites for which consistency findings had been requested from the City. These CEQA documents were circulated to the State Clearinghouse in Sacratrtento, but they were not provided to the City, a respartsible agency, for review asSd corrtzrtent. The City Attorney obtained copies of the docunnents witty a Public Retards Aet request, just as the formal 30-day continent period was due to expire. lrt a letter dated July 1S, ~Ot?5 (Exhibit fi), staff requested that the corrtlx~ent pr;riad nn the subject CEQA dacurr~ents be extended, and that the District send notices and copies of proposed environmental determinations far all current and fu#ure projects to the City for review as a responsible agency. The District responded in a letter dated 7uly 18, 2005 (Exhibit 7) that the CEQA cornrrtent period would. be extended to August 18, '2005. On July l9, 2005, on recommendations from Development Services staff and the City Attorney's office, the Plarmirtg Commission tabled all four cansistertcy finding requests with. an indefinite continuance, pending further ~ireview of the District's development plans and environmental analysis. In order to meet the 40-day tirneframe as specified in the Gavet~€-unent Code, staff has scheduled the requested findings of General Plan consistency for action by the Mayor and ,Page 4 0£'4 Corrlmon Council. After completing a review of the enviror~rn:ental documents, staff ~viIl respond separately to the District within the extended review period agreed to by the District. FINANCCA~.. IMIIsACT None. RECOMMENDATION That the Mayor and Carnrnan Council make the f©13owittg findings: That Monterey II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan ® That Alessandro II Elementary School is consistent with. the General Plan That I3€~rbarfk Sf Elcmentary Schaal is consistent with the General Plan That Wilson II Elementary School is not consistent with the General Plan EXI$ISITS: 1 July 19, 2005 Planning Cotxtmission StaffReport far IvfQnterey ii Elementary Z July 19, 2005 Planning Comiznissiota Staff Report far Alessandro II Elementary 3 July 19, 2005 Planning Camrnission Staff Report for Burbar~lc II Elementary 4 July 19, 2005 planning Conxrnissian Staff Report far Wilson II Elementary 5 July 14, 24105 Memo from Police Chief Garrett irnmon regarding the proposed site for Wilson II Elementary School 6 Letter dated July 15, 2005 from Valerie Ross, Deputy DirectorlCity Planner to Wael Elatar, Facilities Administrator 7 Letter dated July 1$, 2005 from Wael Elafiar, Facilities Administrator to Valerie Ross, Deputy DirectorlCity Planner ~ lY~. C~T~~ OF SAIY BE~LIVARDIIV'O PLANNTi~iG D~~)tSION CASE: Genera] Plan Consistency Determination for the Proposed Wilson II Elementary School AGENDA ITEM: 9 I3EARl'iNG DATE: ,Iu1y 19, 2005 WARD: 7 OWNER; Various APPLICANT: San Bernardino City REPRESENTATIVE: Unified Sctaool District URS Grntzp, Inc. 777 N. "F"Street 10723 Bell Court San Bernardino, CA 924IQ Rancho Cucamonga; CA 921730 909-3 8 t - 1100 909-980-4000 R.Et~UESTfLOCATION: A request from the San Bernardino City Unified Schaal District for a determination that ]and acquisition and drvelapment of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School would be consistent with the City Genera] Plan. The site is approximately $.5 acres, bounded by "I+" Street on the east, "G" Street an the west, 26`x' Street an the north and Arrowvie~v Middle School on the south, located in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district. GONSTRAINT510VER.LAYS: None EI+IVIROIwiM)t1NTAL FINDINGS: d Nnt Applicable _ © Exernpt, P'reviausIy approved Negative Declaration © No Signi#icant Effects © Potential Effects, Mitigation Measures and Mitigatiar~ Monitariztg/Repnrti€Yg PIan STAFF RECUMMCENDATION: © Approval © Conditions ® Denial © Car~tinuatice to: General Plan Consistency Determination Wilson 11 Hlementary5ehaol Site Planning Cc~mxnission Hearing Da€e: 7I13I4~ Page 2 REQUEST AMID L®CA')1'IQN The San Bernardino City Unified School District (District) has requested a determination from the Planning Commission that land acquisition and development of the proposed Wilson Il Elementary School would be consistent with: the City General Plan (Attachment A). The subject $.5-acre site is located at the southeast corr€er of 261 Street and "G" Street, adjacent to the northern boundary of Arrowview Middle Schonl (Attachment B} in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district tAttachment C). The site is proposed far development of Wilson 1~T Elementary SchooE, a 32--classrot~m facility that wnuld accommodate 9Q0 students (Attachment D). SETTING ANI~ SITE CI-IARAC'~'ERISTICS The site proposed for development of Wilson TI Elementary School is appraxirrtately 8.5 acres in .area, located in an existing single-family residential neighborhood. There are 40 single fatnily residences on the proposed site, built primarily in the late 192C?'s and the 1930's. The properties are welE maintained and some of the homes have undergone major improvements recently. 80"/0 of the homes in this area are owner-occupied, and the only vacant lot in the area is owned by the adjacent harneowner. f.and uses surrounding the site include: North: Residential uses in the RS district. South: Arrowview Middle School East: Residential uses in the RS district. West: Residential uses in the RS district. CAI.aIFQRNIA ENVII20N1VIENTAL QUALITY ACT (C;IQA} The determination of consistency with the City General Plan is net a project subject to CEQA. The San Berrtardina City Unified School District would be the lead agency for the project of acquisition and development pf a sehoc~l site. SACICGRC9IJNI~ Section 21 f S 1.2 of the Public Resources Code requires the governing board of a sclsaal district to provide written notice to the Planning Commission with jt€risdictiart prior to acquiring property ;far expansion crr development of a school. SecCio!u 65402 of the Governrraent Coda requires the Plaru~ting Agency to respond within 40 days to the School District with a report on consistency oCthe proposed school facility with its General Plan. Failure to respond within 40 days is deemed a finding of consistency. l;f the Planning Agency finds that the proposed facility is not consistent with the General Plan, the governing body of the school district may overrule the fending and carry out its program. General Plan Consistency determination Watson dI Etemegtary Schoat Site • Planning Commission t-~earing Dates 7/t9lDS Page 3 Wilson lI is one of several sites under consideration by the District for land acquisition and deveioptnent of new schools to meet the growing derrtarxd for classroom space in tlae City of San Bernardino. Notification to the Planning Camtrrission far a determination of General Plan consistency will be required far each proposed school site. The District has infarrned the City of its facility needs assessment and has rnet with City representatives to discuss site selection alternatives an various occasions. Despite serious concerns and apposition expressed by the City, the District's planning process far the Wilson II facility has advanced to the final steps required prior try site acquisition. The District has commenced environmental review pursuant to CEQA, and is now seeking a determination of General Plan Consistency, FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS When the General Plan was adopted in 199, existing public schools were designated PF, Public 1~acilities, Potential school sites were not specifically identified, but addressed thraugir the goals: objectives, and policies in the General Plan. General Plan Objectivt; 1.37 states: "It shall be the objective of the City of Sat3 Bernardino to provide for the continuation of extst3ng and development of new parks, schools, government administrative, police, fire, social service, and other public facilities and open spaces in proximity to and eompatible.~rith residential uses-" In accordance with This objective, the San $emardino City Unified 5chaot District proposes to develop a new school sits to serve the needs of elementary school children residing in the area currently served by Wilson Elementary School, Unfortunately, the specific site prapased by the District for development of Wilson Yl is located in a very stable, well-maintained and cohesive neighborhood. Demolition of 40 existing homes and vacation of a segment of 25't' Street as proposed would impact the existing neighborhood adversely. This would not be compatible with the surrounding residential area, and therefore would conflict with General Flan Objective 1.37. General Plan Objective 1.6 states: "It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to eontzal the development of land uses which may adversely impact the character of the City and quality of life of its residents." Although it as often necessary to detnalish existing structures and displace residents and 1 businesses . fra~n existing neighborhoods to provide much-needed public facilities, development of the site prapased for Wilson II Elementary School would be detrimental to the character of the City and the quality of life of its residents. Mast of the sites proposed by the Distract for develaprnent of new schools require displacement of I Crenerat Plan Consistency Determination Wilsnnli t~lerraensary Schook Site Planning Commission Tearing Date: T/l91{35 Page 4 residents and other existing facilities. However, these other' sites generally exhibit a wide vaa~ety of building types and varying levels of property rriaintenance, interspersed with vacant parcels. The site proposed for development of Wilson Ii Elementary School is part of a fully developed, stable and cohesive neighborhood, evidenced by the high level of owner occupancy, It is a fine example of a 70-yr. old neighborhood that has stood the test of time and continues to thrive. Intntsion into this neighborhood with the demolition of 40 homes would also elirrainate numerous examples of Tudor Revival and Califamia Bungalow architecture that currently enhance the character of the cornrriunity. General Plan Policy 8.7.1 states: "lt slialI be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to monitor the residential growth of the City and wank with the local school districts to expand facilities and services to meet educational needs." The City has been a willing and active partner in site selection for various school facilities planned by the Sara Bernardino City Unified School District to meet the educational needs of the residents of San Bernardino. The site selected by the District for development of Wilson II is not consistent with General Plan Qbjectives 1.37 and 1.5. The City has proposed alternate locations for the District to consider, and the City is willing to continue working with the District to identify an appropriate alternative site, pursuant to Policy 8.7.1. CUI+ICL[JSION _ Tlie goals and policies crf the General Plant support development of scltoot facilities, as heeded to serve the eorrimunity. The site proposed by fire San Bernardino City Unified School District would serve the student enrollment demand front surrounding neighborhoods. However, it would have unacceptable irngacts an the neighborhood selected for acquisition, to the detriment of the surrounding carrtmunity. Staff is recommending a finding that development of Wilson II Elementary School, as proposed, would riot be consistent with the General Plan, based on the following concerns about the particular site under consideration: The proposal waasld break up a stable neighborhood with SO% awzter occupancy, sorraething the City of San Bernardino is striving to achieve in other areas. m The proposal would require vacation of 2S`a' Street, rxaakin~g 2b`h Street the first available east-west street between "l~" and "G" streets earth of Highland Avorttte_ Local circulation is already irrtpeded by Arrowview Diddle School. ~ The existing neighborhood is already impacted by traffic related to dropping off and picking up students at Arrawview Middle School. Addition ofanather school site at the propcas~d location will increase this traffic. The location of Arrawview Middle school an a major thoroughfare increases the potential for outside influences an the middle school students, including exposure to General Plan Consistency 'Determination Wilson Ii lrlementary 5ahool Site Planning Conunission Hearing Data: 7119105 t'age 5 gangs. The Police Department recommends against introducing elementary school students adjacent to this particular middle school. REC®1VI117EN)E1ATl:(ltl~t 5taffrecarramends that the Planning Commission make a finding that acquisition of the site prapgsed for develr~pment a~ Wilson lI Elementary School is not consistent with the City Cxeneral Plan. 17espectfully suhrr3itted, Jarrtes Funk Director of Development Services . Terri Rahhal Principal Planner Attachrtient A Letter received June 24, 20p5, requesting consistency determination an behalf of the San Bernardino City Unified School District Attachment B Location Map Attachment C General Plan Land LJse Map Attachment D Conceptual Site Flan . ATTAC~[I~;I:ENT A June 4, 2(}05 l~fr. James Funk, Director Development Services Department City of San Ben~ardinp 300 North "D" Street. 3`d Floor San Bernardino. Califomia 934k8 Subject: Notice of Prapnsecl Det%elop~Ttent of Three Schools anti Request for General Pkan Canfonnity Finding (Public Resources Code Section Z 1 I S l.2 and California Goverrttnen# Cade Section 6540?.a) Dear Planning Commission: URS Corporation (URS) is presently serving as the environmental consultant to the San Bernardino City Unified School District (the District) to assist in the District's commitment to t17e California Environmental Quality Act and the required environmental analysis, for the three proposed elementary schook sites: Alessandro II, Burbank Il, and Wilson Il. Pursuant to GavernrTxent Code Section fiS402.a, and Public Resources Code Section ? l l S l .2, the District is required to request of the Planning Commission having juri5d~ctxo[l where the prnposed schools are located, notice in writing of the school sites acquisition. Accordingly, this letter shakl serve as formal notice of the prnposed acquisitions, as well as a request that the Planning Ct>tT~n7ission provide written findings tutlie District that the sites are in conformity with the jurisdiction's adopted General Plan, within 40 days of this letter. 1. Alessandrp II: The Proposed Alessandro II Elementary School Site is located southwest of the intersection of Baseline Street and Herrington Avenue in the County of San Bernardino, California. The prnposed project consists of 40 parcels, artd comprises approximately 601,!28 square feet, or approximately 13.8 acres. The proposed elementary school will total 3Z classrooms and would provide education facilities for 900 students irr grades K-S. The jurisdiction's General Plan designates the subject site as Residential Suburban District (RS) and Commercial General District (Ct;'i-!). 2. Burbank II: The Proposed Burbank II Elementary School Site is located between -West IZialto,Avenue, South Alien Street, Valley Street, and Waterman Avenue in the County of San Bernardino, California. The proposed project consists of 43 parcels and comprises approximately 435,500 square feet, or approximately 10.0 acres. The proposed elementary 5clropl will total 20 classrooms and would provide education facilities for 600 students in grades K-6. The jurisdiction's General Plan desigrtates the subject site as Residential Law pistrict (It L} and Office Industrial Parke District (UIP)- d ~~RS 1fC~ifS, Inc. SD~23 9su Court ~'?! 7 Paixha Cu[~~ronga. CA 9173tl ~ VtF ~ '~ LU~~.';,~ ' Tel: 9D9.98D,a0gC5 Fax: 909,980.I393 C6TY p~ b'APJ EEFiiYis90iNJ t1E1/~E.r1PM~IslT 8~RVICES iIEPAFtT]NEN7 Mr. Jarrres Funk, Director Develaprnent Services Department City of San Bernardino June 9, 2005 Page 2 3. Wrlsor~ [I: ~'he I'ropased Wilson II Elementary Schaal Site is located northwest of the intersection of "F" and 2S`~' Streets in the County of San Be~~ardir~o, C:alifan~ia. The proposed project consists of ~ I parcels, and comprises appraxitnately 3'~0,2fit) square feet, ar approximately 8.5 acres. The proposed elementary school will total 32 classrooms and ~vauld provide education facilities far 900 students in grades K-6. The jurisdiction's General Plan designates the subject site as Residential Suburban (ItS). The attached figures show the location and conceptual site pions for each of the proposed projects. Maur prompt attention to this request f©r review is appreciated. [f there are a€ry questions or need far further information, please call me at (909} 980-40(10. Sincerely, URS Jeffry S. Rice, AICP ]Manager, Environmental and Planning - Attachments: Figure 1, Regional Vicinity Map -Alessandro II Figure 2, Project Location Map -Alessandro ll Figure 3, Project Land Use Map ~- Alessandro II Figure 1, Regional Vicinity Map - Burbardc II Figure 2, Pre~Ject LaCatlon Map -Burbank II Figure 3, Project i.~and Usa Map -Burbank II T Figure I, Regional Vicinity Map -Wilson II Figrtre 2, Project I.acatian Map ~- Wilson II Figure 3, Project band Use Map -Wilson !I Cc: Melinda Pure, Facilities Planning and l~evelaprnent, SBCUSD Wael Elatar, Facilities Administrator, SgCUSD Terry Gardner, TLG Real 1;statelFublic Finance ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -* ~v.^~ ~ ~ `,~ if t ~1~ ,> '~' `,;,, ~J' l~ ~ O •, ~f ~ ~ `~'' ` ` f ~ ~ ~ 1 . _ ~ R 1 ' t iii 1 t ~ iyY 6 . v t~ ~ ~ 3 ' ~ 1 ,. 1.~ e Y ~ ~ ( 1 1 ~ Y' t i [ 6 • ~ M I ~ } ~ • _ r. 41°~on R r 0 i ~ t ~ . Fr airy Scl+o~t ~' ~ ~ e_ - ! e c+. i ~ 1[ F 4 ~ ~ 1 ! t K' I A » _ - ~ ,~, 6 r 1 1 ~i 1 e I t ~' 1 ~ _1 ~ l Y .w 1 . E i ~ . R f { 1 t. ~ "" e ~ .1 ' Ir I ,,.,,, -! M 3 ey @~~ t R '~. ° y F ~ _ c e r ~ rl , ~ . A '~ I ` 1 1 .~f`. 1 X11 _ fKr f ~ i ~ •i a 1 1 ' w~ E I Y! 1 e I r 1 Ir _ r..r ~ ~ _ ~ , 1 1 e ~ 0. • I 'f • f . •f R ,~~ f Y. i~ '~ nIM W Elsrnentaiy Sd'lool ~' R Ir 1 Middle Sd~doi ' "' ~ Nigh School SchOt715 Fzailroact 1 Arrrnvtread E3erreentary ~ Ri}ay Elementary 2 mite radius ~ F'arkside Elementary ~ Abraham Liricalrt ~,famentary City oP San Bernard-uw 3 Marshatl Elema~tary ~ I3 Riley Elementary County of San sernard'~o 4 Davidson Elementary Y 4 tvlaunt verr}an Elementary -.'~..~ Panic UUllson Eigrnentary 'yam Golden Valley Middle ~# Howard Inghram Elementary Q~ ArrovMew Middle I~p05evett Elernerttar}I 1 szr San Bemardinn High ~ P~'tC}JE~~' ~,~~~TN~t~ ra. ~-. s. Wilson 11 EEt;mentary School Fi ure 2 ~ April2t)05 Sant Bernardino City 13rtitied School District ~ ~ G1't"9~ Gig A~ ~~1i~dARTliNt3 i'itb.~EG7: ~9Pilspn It ~'~.ANM9N~"s C~MIl~tS~~id Elementary L~~AT~~ ~ ~S~ ®~~'~`~~~`1r~ ~9lr~Rfl\lCa ~~TEc 7/~19lfDa aVt~f~t~"Fl ~ ~ ~ C~ ] ~®, ~ - ® i ~ r $`~~ 0. to 26th rah' i ; ~ .r. r a ~ C7 +, ~ .,. ~ ~ +a tJ i ~m $Ck $G Q Cfl. t17 ~ ` 1-IigMar~d Avenue j '~ a ea ~ i AR rn ~,Y , i~~r__L' ' ~ is ~ ,4CN001~ _ ~ v ,, : . 4= ~ ~r, a `a _ .~, mow. 1irr i -: s.~' I I i III r .y. . , s'~ s Ili I I f.y S.. 'I .H .t:w''. . f.-~•r a; ,t,; =;, r J'i" ;i, s i.~' ?n i ~ . 4 9: i a,• ~' : ~sL: .~sr.~ ,~ µs S''. 4 ~~I' 9 Lid ~ Sa~r~e: INLC Are itects, 2Q~~. "'" February 2~l F _ ~~~t PF~OPQS~I~ PR®J~G1' SITS PI..~?Id n sa 1 pp zaa Wilson 11 ~lernentary Sc~aol Ft ure ~ April 2fl©5 San Bernardino City Unified 5chaot C3istricl ~ i - --_ ~~H~SIT 5 ~'J City of Sou Beruar`dlna ~ • San )Bet-rlardino Police 1J?epalrtment ., :,r•-uinza Interoffice Memorandum _::,,•„cis Ta: Valerie Rass, Senior Planrter l~ rorra: Garrett W. Zirnmon, Chief of Police ' "_...,,,} Subject: Wilson II Proposed School Site Date: .tiny 14, 2005 Copies: llrlaryanne Milligan, City Attorney's Office I feel it is important that the Police Department share some cvncerris .this agency has aver the location selected for the proposed Vililsort 11 School. During a preYious meeting between City staFf and San Bemardizto City School District (SBC5D) sta#~', it was disclosed that the SBCSD was planning on constructing Wilson lI l~letnentary School north of the existing Arrowview Middle School, south of 26'~ Street, east of G Street and west of F Street. The Police Department has cortcems with the construction of a new elementary school in that area far the fallowing reasons: This will build a school next to the middle school, which is located vn a main street (Highland). That school, due to 1) its fronting Highland and 2) the age of the attendees, will attract gang tnetnbers and other snspects~who like to hang around schools. Needless to say, that issue could have an impact an the students attending the elementary school as well as additional public safety problems for the Police Department. This is predominately a residential area. Thus, the traffic patterns created in the neighborhoods by parents who pick up and drop of fcids will significantly impact khe neighborhood. That issue has become a major problem far neighborhoods throrzghout Southern California as it ieally impacts people wllo live in the surrounding colTtmunity. ~ Finally, it wilt close the eastlwest streets north of the existing Arrowview Middle Schoal- thereby causing residents and drivers to go several blaclrs before they can access some of the surrounding neighborhoods or streets. THE SBPD 35 CaMMITTED TO PROVIDING: PRQGI[1SSIVE QIJAG[TY PaLICE SERVICE; A SAFE ENV IftONMENT Ta IMPftaY>r THE QUAt.1TY C3F LIFE; A ftEI3UCTIGN 1N CR1ME THRpUG~t PROBLEM RJCOGNrriON A~i17 PItO$LEM SQLVIAtG ~~~I~.~T 6 ' D~'VTr~,pPM1~q~Iti'r SER~'iGES I3EP~RT!+t>"t~tT rte: • "~ 3Q01'~tcrth "D"Street • Sas2 Bernardino • CA 42418-t1t70] Planning & 8uitding 9t39.3&t.5©57 • Fax: 9Q4.384.508p ~r~~P ~eabtic works/Eagi~teering 9tt9.384.5]Il • Fax: 9(39.3$4.5155 www,s6city.org w sly } s, zoos 'C'IA F~.SCk;41CI.lE ANIB 1J.5< MIL i!~€r. V~'ack FIalar ~ . l:aci}hies Administrator San }3er>rtardrno Oily Unified Schap} District X77 North "F"Street San $ernardino, GA 9?4 } D Re: Proposed 5choo} Sites Dear ,`Vir. lvlatat. On June Z }, ?005, I sent you ~ letter requesting cctpies~of the enti•iranrnental dacumertts far tFie proposed Burbank ]1 and Alessandro lI elerrtematy schools. This }etter indicated tha! I believed chat the City t5 a respr~rtsible agettcy under CI~QA and as a responsible agency has bath the right and the duly under CEQA to revie~~~ and cctrnrnent ort the environmental docurrtents far these proposed school sites, To date, ! hai•e rtoi recei~•ed a respotzse to i~ty inquiry or the em iroruttenlal documents. } recerttl~° became a~4~are frar~ the CI~QArtet database thxaugh the Gtavernor'S Office af~Plartt~ing grid Research that the public review and corrtrnen€ period ends on ,}uly } ~, 2005 for the abo~. e two schools. !further noticed that the review period Cur €he proposed '4Vilsfln Il e}en~entary school is from ltrne ? }, ~Q45 through July 30, Z40S. Hnvt~ever, the City has not received a Notice oClstten! For any of these schools. ~~`iihaut the opportunity tc, review the etlviranmt;ntal documents and cnmrnent on potential environmental impacts and recarr€mertd tnitiga€ion measures, iCany, the City a5 a responsible agency, cartr€ct represent that s~•e cart pra~~ide serti•ices necessary to these sites. !rt addition to the abac~e, proceeding et-ith the environmental determination for th'ikson 1! is especially pral~lernatic. The City has repeatedly tole} the District that it Etas concerns v<~ith the SBC(r`S t7 t'roposed 5~ho~l Sites Ju14• t i. 2ti05 Pale 2 proposed location of this school. Presumably, the environmental document addresses tl3e vacation of 25`" Street and Berkeley Avenue to accarrtmadate €he school, "fhe City has repeatedly told the District that the City canr3ot support, and strongly apposes these street vacat'sons far nvtnerous reasons, including but not limited to the unrnitigable impact on trafhc on surrotar3dir3g streets as a result of these street closures. As it appears tl3at the f}istzit;t failed to follow proper procedures under CEQA by sending any envirortrr3ental documents to the City who is a responsible agency under C~QA, the City hereby reserves the right to raise any issues which it could have raised dut~ng the comment period in any future 3itigation that may be f led ot~ behalf a[ City andlor CiEy Municipal Water Department. Furtiter3nnre, as a responsible agency, the City is again requesting that the City be sent alI notices of intent or notices ofpreparatian ofan IrTR as 'well as any other enviranmer?tal dacurnents for any future school sites located in the City of San Bernardino. in closing, the City and City Municipal Water Department are formally opposed to the adoption of ~legative Declaratiarts far Burbank !!, Alessandro Il, and Wilson ele3x3er3tary schools anti are requesting that the District extend the review period far at least art additianat thirty (30) days to allow the City and Water .District to property respond to these environmental documents. Sincerely, _ ~ ~ ~ . ~,~ alerts C. Ross Deputy Di:rectorlCity Planner c: Members of the S B.C.U.S.D. Board of ]education Arturo Delgado, Superintendent, S.B.C.U.5.I7. .~udith Vallee, Mayor _ lames F. Penman, City A~ttgmey Fred ~Viisan, City Administrator lames Fu€tlc, Deti'elaprttetSt Ser~'iees Director Henry' Brr3~sena, Sr. Deputy CEIV Attorney A~lariattrie Milligan, Deputy City Atto3-3~3ey Stacey Aldstadt, General Manager, San Bernardino ivlunicipal Water Department ' ~%~~~~.~T 7 HI.1 ~~ly~Ll~lVa ~ ~ I Ul~li~!EQ ~CHQa~. DISTRICT Arturo Delgada, I=d.D. Su erlntendent: .loltn A. Peuker#, Assistant Superintendent, ~acifitieslOpesations July 18, 2005 Via Hand Delivery and a-mail Valerie C. Ross, Deputy DirectorlCity Planner Development Services Department City of San Bernardino 300 N. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418-OODI Subject: Ident~ed Schaal Sites Refer ta: City of San Bernardino Development Services Department letter, dated Iuly 15, 2045 Dear l1+fs. Ross, Maur letter, referenced above, was received at my nice via fax on .Iuly 15, 20(}5. In your letter, you refer to an earlier letter from. you to zra~e, dated June 2l, 2005. land my staff` were not aware of this letter. We have conducted a search of our files; cannot find your letter or a record of receiving this letter; and have not had the opportunity to address any request you made in this letter. In response to your current letter, we want yvu to know that the Districfi desires the City's engagerrrerat in such irnpartant matters as the current one. We are p4ea`sed to extend the review and comment period for the City far thirty days from the date ofyaur letter through Monday, August I5, 2Q05. We will assume that this extension is acceptable to #Ite City of San Berrnardino artless we !tear otherwise from you by the close of business on 7uly 215c Copies of the mitigated negative declaration reports far the Alessandro II,1~urbank lI and Wilson lI school sites are attached for your review arxd corntnent. We would like to suggest a meeting within two weeks to address any prelirni3tary issues nr concerns that the City ought have identified regarding these reports. Doe objective of that meeting would be to attempt to resolve most or all of the City's issues, if any, prior to the end of the review peribd: A second objective would be to esfiablish any necessary follow-up meetings within the review period. Please be assured that the School District has always tried fo kee the City involved in new school location and cons#ructian matters. In fact, as recently as June l6 ,the City Attorney's ace made various requests including a written request far the status an CEQA far two of the tiuee identified stew school sites that you referred to in your letter: Wilson ll and Alessandro II (copy attached}. As part of ' our response to that request, the District made available exclusively to ~e City originals of the entire negative mitigation reports, receipt of which was actcnowledged in writing by the City staff. As far as we know, these originals are still in possession of the City. It is apparent from your letter, however, that availability of these originals at the City rstight not have been brought to your artention_ FACILffTfWS MfINAGENtf;N'i- D~PAf~TM)~fVT 7%7 North F Street • San Berrsardirco, CA 9Z41q = (9q9) 381-1236 ~ Fax (9q9) 885-4218 wael.elatar~sixcsd. iclZ.ca.us Please alsr~ note that, in compliance with the law, the District also made copies available for review by t13e public at hnth the Board of Education building front counter at 777 F Street and the City of San Bernardino Public Library located at 555 West 6'~ 5treet. We also forwarded !Z copies of the documents to the State Clearing House for state-wide notification. Ourr actions obviously did not achieve the result desired by both the City and the Schaal District. In order to make this process more effective, the School District coirunits to involv:tng the City as early as practicable in each new school construction project. Also, we would like to extend our t~ffer to meet with #lxe City staff on a regular basis to inclatle all future new school land acquisitir~n and construction projects within the city limits. In order to expedite our response #o your letter, we are delivering this letter and the three negative deelaxation reports in bath electronic format (via e-rr~ail}and in hardcopy {via hand delivery}. Please feel free to use a-mail as well as hardcopy transmittals fox future requests and fallow-up acticaris. Also, l and my staff are available by telephone at {~09) 381-128 and by fax. at {909) 885-4218. l look forward to working with you nn this current matter and on all fixture rnattexs involving the City and the 5chno! District. Sincerely, Wael 111atar Facilities Administrator cc: Members of the SBCUSD fivard of Bducatian Arturo Delgado, Superintendent, SBCU5Z7 - Judith Vanes, Mayor, City of San Bernardino James F. Penman, City Attorney, City of San Bernardino pred Wilson, City Admnistrator, City of San Bernardino James Funk, Development Services Director, City of San Bernardino Henry Etnpefia, Sr Deputy City A~orney, City of San Berr~arclino - Mariaxtne Milligan, Deputy City Attorney, City of San $crrsaxdino Stacey Aldstadt, General Manager, San Bernardino Municipal Water L3epartment 12/08/20fl5 14:39 FR.T 91.8 657 539fl NAI~C ~ ©01 ^~Fd"rt= f]F (`.At dI~RAtta , 815 CAPfCOL UhAF..L„ RppM 364 SACRAMENTO, CA 9S8t4 t~,IS) s5~-ac~s~ (si8y ssr ~ - t3ecemlaer ~, 2406 Mr. Wael Elatar San Reerr=ardina C#ty Uni4ied Schoof i3lstrict 77'7 tVc>rttr F Street San 13emard#na, Ga 92410 Re. W#Isar: li lrlemeritary Scttoai . SCYtf# 240&111108 i7ear Mr. Etatar: Ttsk you sor the opportunity to cnmmem an the above-referenced ctc~uettenc in gddlt[nn to the records search and archaeotogiGat sul'u8y ptanneci ftrr ti7is re~art, the Commission reconttnends the fni#bwing adians be taken to fully assess the s-pac'~ic retate~d ~SrnjeGx ttt?paats on cultural resources: Confi{Ct the Native Arr3erican Heritage Cammissiari far a Sacred Lands Fie search of the project area and in€nrrnation an tri5ai Contacts in the project vicinity who may have add#fEonal cutt~€rai fiesnurce information. a Ptesse'prnv#de U•5.G~8, ioc~tion information for the project site, including C4uadrarrgte, Townstrip, Section, and Range. m We retaammertd that ynt~ contact a#I tribes listed on the contact kst to avoid the unarsttcipatr:d discovery 4f sensitive Nativ® American resatrrCES after the proj~ has b8gun, ® Lack of surface evidence of archealo}icai resources does not preciude their subsurfflce existence. Lead ageOGies shouid include in #treir mitigation plan provisions 9arttte identification and evaluation of aCCidernatty discovQred art:heotog'tcat resources, per Caiifpmia t<rsviranntelttal Quality,ACt (CEQA; ~15t}64.5 (fa. fn areas of identifu;d arcilae4krgic:at sensitivity, a certified sraisaeofGgest and a culturalty afitiliafed Native Ameticart, with ~novuledge iR cutturai resources, should trioni€af ail ground-dis4arhing activfttas. Lead a enci a evdance 2s defined its 5ectir~rs 1537'D ?fi' the C1= A Guidelin wh n si nifrcat,€ Guttural resources are That ccauid b~_~ttS:ci, e Lead agencies silruld include irr ttYelr` rxtitig8ltian pion provisions farthe riispositkan of net~vered ar4ifacts, In ex~nsuttstifsn with CUlturaliy affiliated Native Amer#c&ns. e Lead agencies should include prnvisiarts for discovery of l~fative American human remains arrci cerr~2teries in their mitigation plans. hlealth and Safety Code §7450.5. C1rLaA §'1548,5 (e), and PubkeG Re.SCUrces [;ode §&037.98 mandates the process to he ftsitawed in the event of an acc#derrtat discuvary of any tr€~r?an remains in g Nation cRher than a der~iCatBtt cemetery. STt1GLreiy, ~,; . Corot Gavlsatz f~rogrsrn Anatysi (916) 653-6251 CC: State Clearinghouse Septemfaer 9, 20D5 Wilson Il Ele:mentary School Page 2 that substantiates the clairtz that there will be no significant traffic impacts associated with this project. ~ The results presented in Appendix ~ are based upon several erroneous and/or unsubstantiated assumptions, outdated traffic volume information, inaccurate estimates and outdated reference sources. The dacumentrs flawed and deficient for several reasons, including, but not limited to: 1. The existing peak hour traffic volumes and turn movements at area intersections were estimated using outdated and unacceptable sources of average daily traff c volumes on area roadway segments. Actual vehicular turn movement counts obtained, during peak hours at study intersections must be used. The counts should be obtained on typical mid- week days. to be valid. The results of the analysis cannot be validated without actual traffic counts. This data is important to support claims made about existing traffic volumes and operating conditions (LOS) at study intersections and for area roadway segments. Outdated ADT information is not an acceptable source for existing traffic volumes without prior approval of the City Engineer. The ADT map qn the City's web site includes a Hate clearly indicating that the data presented is not to be used for study purposes without the written approval ofthe City Engineer. 2, The times of the existing peak fours of street and intersection traffic in the area were assumed to be between 4 p.nn. and 6 p.m. far the analysis indicating that these are the "standard" evening peak hours. Standard practice is to obtain 24-hour machine traffic counts on each lag of study intersections to determine the actual peak hours. The proposed sahaal operating hours were Hat identified in the document but it assurr~es that there are no trips associated with the school after 4 p.m. This assumption fails to recognize activities that often occur daily after school hours. These activities include after school programs, organized sports activities and other special events associated with the school that frequently occur at several other elementary schools in the area. Unless there is a caznat~itment Chat the project will not implement such activities at the new site, the afternoon/evening peak hour traffic conditions must be evaluated. There are several locations in San Bernardino where, because of the proximity of one or more sch©ols, the traffic 'volume peak actually occurs earlier in the clay; coinciding with the school peak. The off peak assumption must be verified, especially considering the close proximity of Arrowview Middle School.. 3. No trafftc distribution analysis was presented showing the project traffic estimated on area roadways during peak hours. The document generally describes assumed distribution and trip assignment scenarios for project traffic on area roadways and at area intersections with no basis far the assumptions. The City requires the distributiarz of project traffic to be based upor€ the results of a "select zone" analysis using the East Valley Traffic Model, unless other more appropriate methods can be demonstrated to better reflect actus.l conditions subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The document incorrectly estimates the width of 26'x' Street to be ZS feet wide, but the actual curb separation on 26`x' Street is 30 feet in width, which accommodates parking on both sides of the street. September 9, 2005 Wilson II Elementary School Page 3 5. The document estimates that the existing traffic on 26`h Street "is alzrxost zeta" although in Table 1 it indicates that there are 3$3 existing daily and 30 existing morning peak hour vehicular trips travelling to and from the project. The document further assumes that the existing traffic on 26`~ Street is related only to the existing residences located along that street. This fails to recognize the traffic using 26'~ Street as an east-west route between "G" Street and "E" Street. Our field observations indicate that the existing traffic an 26`~ Street is not solely generated by existing residences along that street segment inasmuch as vehicular traffic has been observed to base 26tr: Street as a pass- through route. 6. The document indicates that the 6'h Editian of Trip Generation, published by 1TE was used in the study, but that edition is old and outdated. The 7`~' Edition is the current edition and it contains significantly higher trip rates for this type of land use. The 7`~' Edition of Trip Generation indicates that the average rate for the morning peak hour 0.42 trips per student as compared to 0.29 trips get student presented in the document in Appendix F. Additionally, the 7'~' Edition of Trip Ge~reratiran no longer provides an estimate of the number of students using buses, citing a need for more data to provide reliable information. The outdated reference used is unreliable and is not acceptable to the City or SANBAG. The document in Appendix F assumes that 60 percent of the students will be bused based upon unreliable and outdated information. The estimate should he based upon substantiated local experience with specific information supplied by the district 7. The document uses the number of students and the ratan published in the 6'h Editian of Trip Generation to estimate the project traffzc. As previously stated this source is outdated and the 7`~` Edition should be used. In addition, the project traffic should be based upon the grass floor area instead of the number of students because student enrallz~nent can fluctuate and it is considered less reliable than actual building area. The maximum capacity c,f student enrollment is ultimately limited to available building area and thus it is a better variable to use for estimating the project traffic and potential far impacts. 8. There is no analysis of future conditions with ar without the project. Future traffic volume forecasts wore not provided using the East Valley Model and approved post- processingmethods as required by the City and SAN$AG. 9. There is no mention of the parking demand or off street parking that will be provided for the site, It is impassible to address parking impacts without identifying the demand anal the amount of parking that will be provided. Insufficient parking has been and continues to be a significant problem at several existing school sites within the City of San $ernardino, causing adverse impacts to surrounding streets and residents during school hours. The docurrient in Appendix F indicates that existing parking along "G" Street and along 2fi~' Street may need to be eliminated to accommodate tum lanes and bus maneuvering. Elimination of any parking clang 26`h Street clang "G" Street will likely have a signifzcartt impact to the residents an those streets. September 9, 2005 Wilson Il Elementary School Page 4 l0. Based upon the information provided, this project will likely meet the threshold requirements for a Traffic Impact Analysis {TTA), pursuant to the County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan {CMP). A TIA must be submitted to SANBAG for review and approval. The study area shall be determined based upon the criteria of the CMl', which requires all key intersections with 50 or more two~way peak hour project trips. II.Operational impacts regarding site access and bus traffic have not been adequately identified and addressed considering that the bus loading area shown an the site plan. does not appear to accommodate the estirr~ated 9 school buses. This could result in the excess buses queuing into 2b~" Street, reducing the capacity of that street and raising safety concerns. Tl?e buses must he converted to "passenger car equivalents" {PCE's) in estimating the traffic generated by the school The PCI;'s should be used in the LOS calculations. In surnznary, the analysis does oat comply with the requirerr~ents of the CMP or the City's guidelines, it is incomplete and inadequate. Tt fails is provide tl-te supporting data and analysis needed to evaluate the validity of the presented level of service results. ;rt fails to provide an 'accurate forecast of site generated traffic, and it fails to provide the data and analysis needed to identify future operating conditions. It is not passible to determine if there are any traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the incomplete information provided. The document contains many assurnptians and statements that cannot be validated without additional supporting data and analysis. tYfayor.Iuditl: Yraltes Cortetcll Me+nbers: r "~ ~ _ ~.ITY sf~N ~.~'.~NA.~r! Y ® ~'stlrer Estrada 300 N. `D "Scree( ,S[fSQl1 l.o7rgt.~tlle S'Qn Bernardino, CA 92418. Gordar: ,ilcGfrr,rls Neil De+vi~ (fig . Website: ~vwtiv.sbcity.org C."(aas Kelter L1lL~ Qernar loo Rihke {/arr JoGnsou 6Y'cnr(g, rl%fcCu»erxack su ~7 tJ MM1'AIR~ JOINT T~.EG~TLAT:~ MEETING MAC'®~ ANTI ~~1VI11Z~N ~~)UNCIL ANTI TTTT~, C~MMUNI'T~' TIT{~"VEL~DT'MENT ~®MMx~SX®N ANTI THE SAN T3ET2NAT2TI~.NQ CITY H®USTNG A[3TH~TZI'I'Y ®F T]KE CT'TY aF SAN BER.NAT~DINI~ M®NTIA'Y, AUGI7ST ~., zao~ - .~a ~.M. CC~LTNCIT~ C~IAl1~T3T~1TtS The City Clerk's Uffce provides this sumzz:ury as a courtesy zczitiC tTFe official rnizzutes are approved. I~z order to provide clarificatio?r, the language izz the offrcial rrzirzzstes mtty differ. (Coznirzurzr'ty Develop?nerzt Comzzrissio?z itejns are ozt pages .l7 ,20.J CALL TO ORDER: PRESENT: .A.BSENT: PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS A three-minute limitation shall apply to each member of the public who wishes to address the Mayor acid Cnmrnnn Council/Community Development Cnmmissrnn. Nn member of the public shall be permitted to "share" his/her three minutes with any other member of the public. CLOSED SESSY4N 1. Pursuant to Government Carle Sectian(s}; 1 {38/01120€35 Consensus M®'1<'l®N: That the Mayor and Carnrnan Cauracil and Community Develaprrient Commission recess to closed session far the following: A. Conference with legal counsel _ existing litigatian - pursuant to Government Cade Section 54956.9(a): Mohammed Fawzi Hassan. et al. v. Cit of San Bernardino et al. -United States District Court Case No. EDCV Q5-328 VAl' (SGLx}; San Bernardino HotelfMotsl Association v. Cit of San Bernardino - Pourth District Court of Appeals Case Na. 1;D37069; San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 46722; Asia Banks a minor b and thrau h her Guardian Ad Litem Michelle Moore, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al. -San Bernardino Superior Court Case Na. SCVSS 11$553. B. Conference with legal caunseI -~ anticipated litigatian - significant exposure to litigation -pursuant to subdivision (b) (1), (2}, (3) (A-l^) of Governzx~ent Code 5ectian 54956.9: Antoinette Clarke C. Conference with legal counsel -anticipated litigation -initiation of litigation _ pursuant to subdivision ©af Government Code Section 54956.9: City of San Ber~xardino v. San Bernardino Unified Schaal District SSS Hope ,Street APN~k 028015115 vacant Lot APN# 02$01511 d 595 Hope Street APN 028015114 - 8.34 Cleavenger Street APN# 025018144 D. Closed Session -personnel -- pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. B. Closed session with Chief of Police on matters posing a threat to the security of public buildings ar threat to the public's right of access to public services or public facilities _ pursuant to Governn-€ent Code Seetior] 54957. F. Gonference'with labor negotiator -pursuant to Government (ode Section 54957.6: 2 08101 005 Negotiator: Linn Livingston, Director ofHuman Resources Ern. to ee Or anization: San Bernardino City Professional Firefighters G. Conference with real Iaroperty negotiator -- pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8: 1. Pro e 247 West'I~hird Street Negntiatin Pg•_arties: 7udi#h Valles, Mayor, an behalf of the Redevelopment Agency, praperry owners, and Gerry Newcombe, Deputy Administrative Officer, nn behalf of the County of San Bemardinn Under Ne otiation: Purchase price, terms and conditions 2. Pro e That parcel consisting of approximately G7.7S acres identified as Parcel 1-2 at the San Bernardino Intematinnal Airport, and generally bounded by Harry Sheppard Boulevard, Del Rasa Drive, Paul Villasenor Bn€ilevard, and Memorial Drive Negntiatin~ Parties: ~~Don Rogers on behalf of the Inland Valley Development Agency. David Newsom on behalf of ~Hillwood/San Bernardino LLC. Bruce Varner an behalf of Stater Bros. Markets. 3ames F. Penman on behalf of the City of San Bernardino Under Negotiation: Terms and conditions 3. Pro joint Use Multipurpose Room/Gy~ririasium at the Cesar Chavez Middle Schaal, 5b50 Magnolia Court, San Bernardino, California Negotiatin P~ artier: Marianne Milligan, City Attorney's Office and Teri Baker, City Administrator's Office for the City of San Bernardino, licencee, Wael Plater, Facilities Administrakar, San Bernardino City Unified School District, as }property owner Under Ne ntg iatinn: Terms and conditions 4. Pro e Vacant land APN 0155-101-08 3 48/fl I/2t3flS Owner/Seller: Gary Van Osdel, Executive Director on behalf. of the Redevelaprnent Agency of the City of San Berrrardina, property owner(s) BB=fir: Denise Dee Whisler 5. Pro e Southwest carver of "J" Street and 17"~ Street APN0144-123-03, 0144-131-35; 0144-131-21, and 0144-123-416 Owner/Seller: Gary Van Osdel, Executive Directar, on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San $erriardino, property owner(s) Buyer: .inland Empire Concerned African American Churches ~V17A Redevela tncnt I'rcr'ect Area eadawbraak Honsin Pro'ect 6. Pro e 151 East 2°d Street APN 0135291-09 Neaatiatin~? Parties: Gary Van Osdel, Executive Directar, on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and/or San Bernardino City Hauling Authority, as buyer, and Ivan Miletich, property owner Under Negotiation: Purchase pnice, terms and canditians 7. Pro e -.,161 East 2'~a Street APN 0135-291-I1 Ne~otiatin~ Parties: Gary Van Osdel, Executive Director, an behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and/or San Bernardino City Housing Authority, as buyer, and Alberta )Malcan and Maria Garcia, property owners Under Negotiation: Purchase price, terms and conditions 8. Pro e 167 East 2~'~ Street APN 0135-291.-12 Ne~atiating_Par~ies: Gary Van Osde1, Executive Director, an behalf of the Redevelaprnent Agency and/or San I3err€ardino City Housing Authority, as buyer, and Pedro Medina 3r., property owner Under N~otiatian: Purchase price, terrrts ar~d canditians 9. Pro e : 155 East King Street APN 0 1 3 529 1-27 Ne og bating Parties: Gary Van Osdel, Executive Directar, on behalf of the Redevelopzr~ent Agency and/or San 4 0&/D 112x05 I3ernardina City Housing Authariry, as buyer, and Miguel Ramirez, property owner Undo Ne~atiation: Purchase price, terrns and conditions I0. Pro e .253 East Icing Street APN OI3S-302LL49 Negatiatin~ Parties: Gary Van Osdet, 'Executive Pirectar, or€ behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and/or San Bernardino City Housing Authority,. as buyer, and Victor Licon, property owner Under Negotiation: Purchase price, terrr~s and conditions Central City Nartlt Redevelop~xeni ~roiect Area t t. Pro e 745 West S'h Street APN O t 34-093-OS and A)?N O t 34-093-06 Negotiatin Pg artier: Gary Van Osdel, Executive Dixectar, an behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and Patrick A- Abitante Trust, property awner(s} Under Ne otiatian: Purchase price, terms, and conditions 12. Pro e Vacant Land APN 0 t 34-OS4-24 N~atiatin~ Parties: ~-Cxary Van Osdet, Executive Director, on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and book Sung Investrnent Ca. Ltd, property awner(s} UnderNe otiation: Purchase price, terms, and conditions 13. Pra e 740 West 4`~' Street APN 0134-093-19, 20, and 43 Ne~otiatingParties: Gary Van Osdel, Executive I7irectar,.on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency, and Penhun Ltd:/Expo I,td., property awner(s} Under Negotiation: Purchase price, terms, and conditions 14. Pro er 723-739 West S~' Street APN 0134-093-07 5 X8/01.'2005 Negotiating Parties: Gary Van Gsdel, Executive Director, on behalf of the Redevel©pment Agency and Walter L. B. Ammons, property owner(s) Under Negotiation: Purchase price, terms and conditions 15. Pro e 708, 720 West 4`" Street APN 0134-093-45 Ne otg lating Parties: Gary Van Osdel, Executive Director, on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and Chiya Lapham, property owner(s) Under Negotiation: Purchase price, terms and conditions 1V)(t. Vernon Cc?rrldar Redevela[~nnent ~'roject Area 1G. Pro e Vacant land APN 0139-291-60 and APN 0139-291-61 Negotiating Parties: Gary Van C}sdel, Executive Director, on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and Diana Enterprises/County of San Bernardino, property owner(s) Under_Ne~ntiation: Purchase price, terms and conditions City Attomey Peruman announced that the following additional case would be discussed in closed session under Agenda Iterri 1B, Signitacant exposure to litigation: Astrp Motel v. City of San Bernardino. City Attorney Penman announced that the following case had been discussed in closed session uztder Agenda ltern 1 A, Existing litigation: City & Economic Development Agency v. Valerie Pope Ludlartt,. Michael Beauregard, Eddie and Yolanda Negrete & At Steward -San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 108965. END ~F CLOSED SESSI®N ' 6 asio~rzaa5 RECONVENE MEETING - 3:Ob P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: INVOCATION: PLEL7GE: 2. Appointments. 3. Presentations. • Announcements by Mayan and Common Council. All Consent Calendar iterrzs listed are considered to be routine by the City Council and will 6e enacted by one rnotx"on. There will be rxa separate discussion of these items unless a Council rrtenxber or other interested persons so request, in whr'ch event ilie iterrt will be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered in its normal sequence orx tlxe agenda. Infarmatiorz concerning Consent Calendar iterrxs is available for publr"c review. C®NSEIVT CAL)~NDAR MOTS®N: Tlaat the motions indicated by consent calendar items 5 through 33, be adapted except for 13, l~l, 18, Zl, 23, 24, ?8, 32, and 33. S. Waive full reading of resolutions clad ordinances. Approved MO'TTON: That full reading of the .resolutions and ordinances on the regular, supplemental and addendum to the supplemental agendas of floe Mayor and Common Council/Community Development Corrlmissian, San Bernardino City Housing Authority, be waived. 6. Council Minutes. Approved MOTION: That the minutes of the fallowing meeting of the Mayor and Common Caulacil/Community Development Camisslon of the • City of San Bernardino be approved as subzrlitted in typewritten forn'1: .Dune 20, X005 (Distributed ©n 7126!05) 7. Claims and Payroll. (See Attached} 7 481©1/20Q5 Approved MOTION: That the claims and payroll and the authorization to issue warrants as listed an the memorandum dated July 26, 2005, fram Barbara Pachon, Director of Finance, be approved. 8. Personnel Actions. (See Attached) Appraved MOTION: That the personnel. actions, as submitted by the Chief Examiner, dated July 29, 2005 in accordance with Civil Service rules and Personnel policies adapted by the Mayor and Commax~ Council of the City of San Bernardino, be approved and ratified. Animal Control 9. Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council. of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the Mayor to execute an Animal Control Services Agreement ~y and between the City of San Bernardino and the City of Loma Linda far the period July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008. (See Attached) (Anticipated revenue to the City in FY 204512446 -- $74,440<) Appraved MOTION: That said resolution be adapted. .Adopted 2045-257 City Administrator 10. Resolution of the Mayor and Comxxzon Council of the City of Saz~ Bernardino authorizing execution of an agreerzx~nt with the City of San Berrtardina and Westexzx Regional Little League Baseball, Inc., for fixtaxxcial assistance from the FY OS/OG Civic and Proxnatian Fund, {See Attached) {Cast to the City -- 55,040 in direct funding from the General Fnnd and $39,4I5 ixx indirect funding fraxx3 various funds,) Ward 5 App roved MOTION: That said resolution be adopted; that direct funding in the amount of $5,000 from the FY 05/06 Civic and Promotion Fund be .approved; that indirect funding irx the amount of $39,415 be Crax~sferred from the FY 05/Ofi Civic and Promotion Fund to various City departmental accounts as listed in the attached staff report dated July 13, 2005, fram Fred Wilson, City Administrator, axad that a waiver of fees and use of City personnel and equipment be authorized in the conduct of their 2005 tournament season. Adopted 2045-258 Ci~.Attorney 11. Resolution of the Mayor and Caxnxnon Council of the City of San Bernardino approving the des#ructian of certain records no longer required to be maintained by the San 'Bernardino City Attorney's Office. {Closed Banknzptcy fries) (No cost to the City.) (See Attached) 8 ~ 0$/©IIZO€tS Wilson f! Elementary School Dra~f Environmental impact Report December, ~pQ7 ~1p~pendix ~ Trafi~ Red®rt and Parking Study ~FCCC:7SS'FiCaA1~S 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 !ruins, CA 92606 Prepared by: Carleton Waters, P.E. Min thou, P.E. Kyra Tao, E.LT. Jane ~Var~g, E.I.T. Prepared ~€or: 1V1r. John y'Vesterr~eier KLEINF'EL®ER, INC 7370 Valley Vista ®rive, Suite 150 ®iarrrond i3ar, CA 9'1765 V~"6L~®~ II ELEMENT~a~Y ~~H®®L gg'q~ 1°s FgFI~~ If1~~.ACT ANALYt~I~ ~ 1 ~6 ~I 1 ~ u7~l~d &~E~IV~~®1~~y ~1~~„,~F~~~1pi March 13, 2007 J N :03429-03 C'VIl: IVI~: ACT: J W: c ~ ~'AI3LE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Project Overview 1.2 -Study Area 1.3 Analysis Methodologies 1.3.1 Overall Analysis Methodology 1.3.2 Traffic Operations Analysis 1.4 Definition of Deficiency and Significant Impact 1.4.1 Definition of Deficiency 1.4.2 Definition of Significant Impact 2.0 PROJECT DESCRfPTIDN 2~1 2.1 Project Description 2.2 Project Traffic 2,2.1 Project Trip Generation 2.2.2 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 2.2.3 Baseline Traffic Count Data Analysis 2.2.4 Recommended Rnalysis Locations and Time Periods 3.0 EKfSTING CONDITIONS 3-1 3.1 Existing Roadway System and Daily Traffic Volumes 3.2 Existing Pear Hour Traffic Volumes 3.3 Existing Traffic Operations 3.4 Planned Transportation Improvements and Relationships to General Plan 4.0 FUTURE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDiTfONS 4-1 4.1 Future With and Without Project Traffic Gonditions 5.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS -1 5.9 Future interim Year Traffic Operations 5.1.1 2010 (Interim Year} Without Project Conditions 5.1.2 2010 (Interim Year} With Project Conditions 5.2 Future Horizon Year (2030) Traffic Operations 5.21 Horizon Year (2030} Without Project C©nditions 5.2.2 Horizon Year (2030) With Project Conditions 6.0 PROJECT FAIR SHARE CALCULATIONS fi-1 7.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7-1 7.1 Summary 7.1.1 The Project 7.1.2 Existing Study Area Conditions 7,1.3 Future Cand itions 7.2 Recommendations 7.2.1 On-site Improvements 7.2.2 O~rvsite Improvements 7.2.3 Parking Analysis APPENf~ICES CITY'S COMMENTS LETTER, DATED SEPTEMBER 9, 2005................................. A EVTM SELECT ZONE ANALYSIS B 24 HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT WORKSHEETS C PM PEAK PERIOD TRAFFIC TEMPORP.L ANALYSIS D fNTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTY WORKSHEETS E EXISTING CONDITION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS F SIGNAL WARRANT AN,~LYS15 WORKSHEETS G FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME REFfNEMENT WORKSHEETS H 2010 fNTER[M YEAR CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (WITHOUT AND WITH fMPROVEMENTS) 1 2010 fNTERIM YEAR CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WITH PROJECT (WITHOUT AND WITH IMPROVEMENTS} J . 2030 LONG RANGE CONDITIONS fNTERSECTION ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT (WITHOUT AND W#TH IMPROVEMENTS) K 2030 LONG RANGE CONDITIONS INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WITH PROJECT (WITHOUT AND WITH fMPROVEMENTS) L Lls~r oi= ExH1B1TS EXHIBIT PAGE 1~A LOCATION MAP - 1 2 - SITE PLAN 1 3 1~C 203D PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT PCE VOLUME REFINEMENT PROCESS 1-7 2-A INTERIM YEAR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 2-3 2-B AM (HIGHEST) PEAK HOUR PROJECT LINK VOLUMES 2-10 2-C BASELINE TRAFFIC COUNT PROGRAM RESULTS 2.11 2~D RECOMMENDS©1NTERSECTION LOCATIONS AND PM ANALYSIS TIME PERIODS 2-15 2-E PROJECT ONLY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) ~-17 2-F PROJECT ONLY AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 2-18 2-G PROJECT ONLY PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 2-19 3•-A EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS ........................................................................~~-~--~•---.................. 3-2 3-B EXISTING AVERAGE DAfLYTRAFFIC (ADT) 3-3 3~C EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 3~5 3-D EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR fNTERSECTION VOLUMES 3-6 3-E SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT 3-8 3-F SAN BERNARDiNO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSSwSECTIONS 3-9 3~G CITY OF SAN BERNARDiNO GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT .........................................•-......,............................ S-1d 3-H CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS 3-11 4-A 20'10 INTERIM YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT} 4-3 4-B 2010 INTERIM YEAR WITH PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 4-4 4-C 2030 WITHOUT PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC {ADT).... 4-5 4-D 2030 WITH PROJECT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC {ADT) ..........................e. 4-6 5-A 2010 INTERIM YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 5-2 5-B 2010 INTERIM YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 5-3 5-C 2010 INTERIM YEAF~ WITH PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 5-7 5-D 2010 INTERIM YEAR WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 5-8 5-E 2030 WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR f NTERSECTION VOLUMES 5-11 5-F 2030 WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 5-12 5-G 2030 WITH PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 5-13 5-H 2030 WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 5-14 7-A ON-SITE CIRCULATION RECOMMENDATIONS 7-4 LIST OE T/aBLES TABLE PAGE 2-1 TRIP GENERATION RATES (BASED ON STUDENT ENROLLMENT} 2--3 2-2 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY (BASED ON STUDENT ENROLLMENT).. 2-4 2-3 TRIP GENERATfON RATES (BASED ON PROPOSED BUILDING ' SQUARE FOOTAGES) 2-5 2-4 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY (BASED ON PROPOSED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGES} 2-6 3-1 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS 1=OR EXISTING CONDITIONS 3~7 5•~1 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR INTERIM YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS ...,........ 5-4 5-2 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR INTERIM YEAR WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS .............~-~--•----...............................................................---•------•- 5-5 5-3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR 2030 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS 5--9 5-4 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR 2030 WITH PROJECT GONDITfONS 5-15 6-1 PROJECT FAIR SHARE FOR IMPROVEMENTS 6-1 WILSON II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRAI=I~IC IMPACT .ANALYSIS CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 'I A INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the traffic impact analysis conducted to assess the potential impacts of the proposed Wilson 11 Elementary School an the roadway system in the study area. Exhibit 1-A depicts the location of the proposed project in relation to the existing roadway network. The site plan for the proposed Wilson lI Elementary School development is shown on Exhibit 1-B. The project is bounded by 26th Street to the north, F Street to the east, G Street to the west and Arrow View Middle School to the south in City of San Bernardino. The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to evaluate the development of the Wilson I1 Elementary School from a traffic circulation standpoint. In addition, the study is intended to address the City's comments dated September, 2005 regarding the previous traffic analysis conducted by URS ,(see Appendix "A„}- The introduction to this report presents an overview of the project and' provides a brief description of the study area. The analysis methodologies used to evaluate the impacts of the project are described and- the definitions of roadway system deficiencies and significant project impacts are _ presented in the context of the CMP and CEQA requirements. However, an actual CMP study is not required, as the project is a school development withdut specific funding sources from the County. Subsequent sections of the report will describe the project in detail and provide a complete description of existing and projected traffic conditions within the study area. 1w1 EXHIBIT ~-A „, .r~.rr,~r.....~,.~..._....... ~~`'`~~ ~ E ~ 28TH ST. p. ~ jj~ y¢V vi ~ ut-J ~ ~ i d S LI ~ W fL 27TH ST. r GOl3RTiANb flR. r 267H ST. 26TH ST. 5~(hirEri?:~! ~ d fi•;°)3iidirau ~i 25TH ST. :~:;':':::~F~~~~~:y "` ~ . .F :.:.:.:..:.::a 1:::::::-::..~~.:;;iii}iii::ci 25TH ST. r E?:?:;y:,:_w d:;~~:;~:::Y O 24TH ST. M ':""L;::": ~'~ ~ 25TH ST. ~ ~ U ~ ~ fTO 8E ABANUpNEA) 23Rb ST. HIGHL4Nb AV. POTENTIAL SCHOOL ~r.~.. ATTENDANCE ~ BOUNDARY ---~-- - TO BE ABANDdNEI] INTERSECTION ~ ANALY5i5 LOCATidN ~ ~ ~ ~=~oG~„ 16TH ST. .n<:,r ,rhw..~..r~ WILSON II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, San Sernarcfino, Caiifornia - 03429: Q1 ~JF~IBARE GriQSSROA05 ~-2 EXHIBIT ~-B ~ ~ 26TH STREET ,~ ~ ~ 25TH ;.,s~ ~ = _ - -. ~ ~ . ~ '~`. ~ m ro ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . x= I mg ~ ~1 ~~- ~~,\~~\`~`~~`~ `~`~~,\~\~ 25TH STREET 1- 't ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ` e~ F 24TFI ~ b ~ ~ °®e ~ ~ a ~®z® ~ iTREET ~ ~ A®~I 1/f~~U i~l~~DLE ~CH~®L CROSSp.pa.65 WILSOiV II ELI=MI=NTARY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, California - 03429: 02 1.1 Project Overview The project is bounded by 26th Street to the north, F Street to the east, G Street to the west and Arrow View Middle School to the south in City of San Bernardino (see Exhibit 1_g for project site plan}. The approximately 8.5 acre project site currently includes 40 existing single family residential units (to be eliminated) and an approximately 31,Q00 square foot vacant lot. The project would require that-25th Street between G Street and F Street and Berlteley Avenue between 25th Street and 26th Street be abandoned. As illustrated on Exhibit 1-B, access to fihe project site will be provided via G Street and 26th Street (student drop-ofF area). The internal circulation along G Street within the parking area along G Street will be configured as one way circulation and will be served by two driveways along G Street. The southerly driveway far inbound traffic will be aligned with the existing 24th Street and the northerly driveway for outbound traffic wil[ be aligned with the existing 25th Street. The exclusive student drop-off area will be provided along 26th Street. The drop-off circulation is also configured as one way flow. 1.2 Study Area The objective of the proposed Wilson 1l Elemental School is to relieve overcrowding of the existing Marshall Elementary School and Wilson I Elementary School. Exhibit 1-A shows the potential school boundary and .the proposed analysis locations. The analysis locations have been discussed with City of San Bernardino staff. Regional access to the site is provided by the State Route 30 (SR-30) and State Route 259 (SR-259) Freeway. ~.ocal access is provided by various arterial roadways and local roadways in the vicinity of the site_ The east-west roadways 1-~ which will be mast affected by the project include Nigh[and Avenue, 23rd Sfir~et, 24th Street, 25th Street, 26th Street, 27th Street, Caurtland Drive, and 28th Street. Nc~rkh-south roadways expected to provide local access include H Street, G Street, F Street and E Street. A series of scoping discussions were conducted with the City of San Bernardino {local agency required) to define the desired analysis locations far each future analysis year. As illustrated on Exhibit '1-A, the following intersections have been identified as study intersections: H Street (NS) at: Highland Avenue (EW) G Street (NS} at: 28th Street (EW) Courtland Drive (EW) ® 26th Street West (EW) ® 26th Street East (EW) ® 25th Street (EW) 2~th Street (EW) 23rd Street (EW) Highland Avenue (EW) F Street (NS) at: 26th Street East (EW) E Street (NS) at: 28th Street (EW) ~ Highland Avenue (EW) 1-5 ~ .3 Anal sis Methodolo ies This sectian of the report presents the methodologies used to perform the traffic analyses summarized in this report. The methodologies described are consistent with the San Bernardino Count Can estion Mana ement Pro ram Traffic Stud Guidelines. The fallowing analysis years are considered in this report: ® Existing Conditions - 2007 Interim. Year - 2010 (Project Full Occupancy Year) ® Horizon Year - 2030 (Long Range General Plan Year} The averail methodofogies used to develop future traffic volume forecasts, and the explicit traffic operations analysis methodologies are summarized herein. The primary sectian of interest to the non-technically oriented reviewer is Section 1.x.2 {Definition of Significant Impact}. 1.3.1 Overall Analysis Methodology As described previously, traffic conditions are evaluated in this report for both existing conditions and. two future horizon years. Urban Crossroads, Inc. conducted the actual traffic counts to quantify existing traffic conditions. Exhibit 1-C illustrates the overall 2030 peak hour'turning movement volume refinement process. The Horizon Year (2030) without project traffic volumes have been derived from the East Valley Traffic Model (EVTM) currently being used for long range planning for the City of San Bernardino. EVTM traffic model applies independently for the passenger car and truck model. There are several differences between the procedures for the passenger car model and the truck model. One difference is the factors used to determine the peak hour volumes from the EVTM traffic model peak period traffic assignments and the passenger car equivalent factors. The passenger car 1-6 w ~ ~ U tG~ ~ ~, ~, t~i UJ '~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~U zrd ~ oa ~ e ~ ~ z~ e Q w tt.~ 4~ r ..y ~tJ C"1 ~ ~ N Z. Z~ ~ CC ~ 2 ~ Zt- c~~ W~ 1-- ~ X ~ CL 4 ~ rA~ U3= O ~ W~ o 6 ~ ~ ~ tsl O a. W 2d ~[~i- F F" 7 ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ N~ ~,N - ~ ~ COY U 4 d ~ ~ ~ ~ w~ z~ ~...s t-u~ 'Z lA1 N d 111 o O r~t3~ ~iU o ~ ~O ~ `n o ~ M ~ ° ~ utis a ~ ~, ~ c°v ~ ~ o. J 0 °a ~'~ wx o~ ~ ~w cam o~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ x a 4 ~ ~ ~ w w v~ ~ 4 ° ~, ~o z d~ w 0 o~ model uses an AM peak period to peak hour factor of 0.38 and a PM peak period to peak hour factor of 0.28. The truck mode! uses an AM peak period to peak hour factor of 0.333 and a PM peak period to peak hour factor of 0.25. The passenger car model does not require a passenger car equivalent {PCE} factor {e.g., PCE factor is equal to 1.0), and the truck model uses a PCE factor of 1.5 for buses/recreational vehicles, 2.0 for 3 axle- units, and 3.0 for 4 or more axle units. The EVTM passenger car model has a base (validation] year of 2000 and a horizon {future forecasfi} year of 2030. The difference in model volumes {2030 - 2007} defines the growth in firaffc over the 23-year period. Since the existing conditions traffic count data was collected in 2007, the overall model growth must be adjusted to reflect only the growth from 2007 to 2030 {23 years instead of 30 years}. A factor of.0.76 has therefore been applied to the overall model growth to determine the incremental growth that was added to the existing count data to determine the refined 2030 roadway segment daily and peak hour approach and departure traffic volumes. The EVTM truck model has a base (validation} year of 1994 and a horizon (future forecast} year of 2020. However, SANBAG has directed that all analysis assume that the 1994 base year is fur~ctianally equivalent to 2000 canditiorts. The difference in mode[ volumes (2020 - 2000[1994Jj defines the growth in traffic aver the 20 year period to 2020 conditions. The growth is multiplied by a factor of 1.50 to extrapolate from 2020 conditions to 2030 conditions. Since the existing conditions traffic count data was collected in 2007, the overall model growth must be adjusted to reflect only the growth from 2007 to 2030 {23 years instead of 30 years]. A factor of 0.766 (23130] has therefore been applied fio the overall model growth to determine the incremental growth that was added to the existing count dafia to determine the refined 2030 roadway segment daily and peak hour approach and departure traffic volumes. 1-8 The refined future peak hour approach and departure volumes obtained from these calculations are then entered iota a spreadsheet program consistent with the National Cooperative Highway Research Program {NCNRP Report 2~5), along with initial estimates of turning movement proportions. A linear programming algorithm is used to calculate individual turning movements which match the known directional roadway segment forecast volumes computed in the previous step. This program computes a likely set of intersection turning movements from intersection approach counts and the initial turning proportions from each approach leg. The interim Year 201a without project traffic volumes are estimated by interpolating the 2007 existing traffic volumes and the 2030 long range traffic volumes. Project traffic volumes were estimated using the manual approach described in the CMP guidelines. The trip generation calculation is based on the most recent institute of Trans nrtation En ineers Tri Generation Rates, 7th Edition. Project trip distribution has been reviewed and approved by the City of San Bernardino staff. A select zone (trip distribution) analysis far the proposed Vllilson Il Elementary Schaal was performed using the EVTM model for both the Interim 2010 and 2030 Narizon. The project only traffic forecasts have been generated by applying the trip generation, distribution and traffic assignment calculations. Project traffic volumes were then added to the refined future year EVTM traffic model volumes and the interpolated 2010 volumes to represent the 2030 and 20101fVith Project traffic volumes respectively. Flow conservation checks and forecast adjustments were performed as necessary to ensure that all future Interim Year 2010 and 2030 traffic volume forecasts are reasonable. The result of this traffic forecasting procedure is a series of traffic volumes suitable for traffic operations analysis. 1-9 1.3.2 Traffic Operations Analysis The current technical guide to the evaluation of traffic operations is the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM} (Transportation Research Board Special Repack 209}. The HCM dunes level of service as a qualitative measure which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate 1_OS (Level of Service) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The definitions of level of service far uninterrupted flaw (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices} are: L05 "A" represents free flaw. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. LOS "B" is in the range ~ of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver. ® LOS "C" is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flaw in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. LOS "D" represents high-density but stable flaw. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. 1-10 LOS "E" represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow will cause breakdowns in traffic movement. ® LOS "F" is used to define forced ar breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amaunfi of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the paint. Queues form behind such locations. Uninterrupted flow is generally found only on limited access (freeway) facilities in urban areas. The definitions of level of service for interrupted traffic flaw (flow restrained by the existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices} differ slightly depending on the type of traffic control. The level of service is typically dependent an the duality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection contra!. The levels of service determined in this study are calculated using the HCM methodology. For signalized intersections, average fatal delay per vehicle for the overall intersection is used to determine level of service. Levels of service at signalized study intersections have been evaluated using an HCM intersection analysis program. For all way stop (AWS) controlled intersections; the ability of vehicles to enter the intersection is not controlled by the occurrence of gaps in the flaw of the main street. The AWS controlled intersection has been evaluated using the HCM methodology for this type of multi-way stop controlled 9T11 intersection canfigurafiion. The level of service for this- type of intersection analysis is also based on average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection. The study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop-control on the minor street have been only analyzed using the two-way stop- cantrolled unsignaiized intersection analysis methodology of the HCM. Far these intersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent an the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing fihe intersection configuration grad trafrl'ic volumes at these locations to calculate average intersection delay; the level of service has been calculated. The level of service crifieria far this type of intersection analysis is based on total delay per vehicle for the worst mirror street movement(s). The levels of service are defined in terms of average delay for the intersection analysis methodology as follows: AVERAGE TOTAL LEVEL ©F DELAY PER VEHICLE SERVICE (SEG©NDS) SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 #0 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 E 80.01 and up 50.01 and up Per CMP guidelines, signalized intersections are considered deficient (LQS "F") if the overall intersection critical volume to capacity (VICE ratio equals or exceeds 1.0, even if the level of service defined by the delay value '!-~2 is below the defined LOS standard. The V/C ratio is defined as the critical volumes divided by the intersection capacity. A V/C ratio greater than 9.0 implies an infinite queue. A level of service analysis must be conducted on all existing segments and intersections on the CMP network potentially impacted by the pra~ect or plan (as defined by the thresholds in Section 1 B of the 2003 San Bernardino CMP). Urban segments (i.e., segments on roadways that are generally signalized) do not require segment analysis: Segment requirements can normally be determined by the analysis of lane requirements at intersections. The L4S analysis far signalized intersections has been performed using optimized signal timing. This analysis has included an assumed last time of two seconds per phase in accordance with San Bernardino CMP recommended default values. Signal timing optimization has considered pedestrian safety and signal coordination requirements. Appropriate time for pedestrians have also been considered in the signalized intersection analysis. The fallowing formula has been used to calculate the pedestrian minimum times for all HCM runs: [(curb to curb distance) / feetlsecond)] ~- 5 seconds Saturation flow rates of 9,800 vehicles per hour of green (vphg) for through and right turn lanes and 9 ,700 vehicles for single left turn lanes, 9 ,600 vehicles per lane far dual left turn lanes and 9,500 vehicles per lane for triple left turn lanes have been assumed for all capacity analysis. These are the default values recommended by the CMP guidelines. As required by the San Bernardino CMP, the peak hour traffic volumes have been adjusted to peak 95-minute volumes far analysis purposes using the existing observed peak 95-minute to peak hour factors far all scenarios 9-93 analyzed. Where feasible improvements in accordance with the local jurisdiction`s General Plan and which result in acceptable operations cannot be identified, Elie 2030 and 2010 peak hour factor has been adjusted upwards to 0.95. This is specifically allowed by the San Bernardino CMP guidelines to account for the effects of congestion an peak spreading. Peak spreading refers to the tendency of traffic to spread more evenly across time as congestion increases. 1.4 Definition of Deficiency and Significant Impact The fallowing definitions of deficiencies and signifcant impacts have been developed in accordance with'the Cify of San Bernardino and County of San Bernardina CMP requirements. 1.4.1 Definition of Deficiency The definition of an intersection deficiency has been obtained from the City of San Bernardino General Plan. The General Plan states that peak hour intersection operations of LOS "D`" or better are generally acceptable. Therefore, any intersection operating at LOS "E" to "F" will be considered deficient. The identification of a CMP deficiency requires further analysis in satisfaction of CMP requirements, including: Evaluation of the mitigation measures required to restore traffc operations to an acceptable level of service with respect to CMP and local jurisdiction LOS standards. ® Calculation of the project share of new traffic an the impacted CMP facility during peak hours of traffic. 1--14 Estimation of the cost required to implement the improvements required to restore traffic operations to an acceptable level of service as described above. This study incorporates each of these aspects for all locations where a CMP deficiency is identified. x.4.2 Definition of Significant Impact The identification of significant impacts is a requirement of CEQA, and is not directly addressed in the CMP document. The County of San Bernardino General Plan and Circulation Element have been adopted in accordance with CEQA requirements, and any roadway improvements within the County of San Bernardino which are consistent with these documents are not considered a significant impact, so long as the project contributes its "fair share" funding for improvements. A traffic impact is considered significant and unmitigable if the project both: i) contributes measurable traffic to; and ii) substantially and adversely changes the level of service at any off-site location projected to experience deficient operations under foreseeable cumulative conditions, where feasible improvements consistent with the County of San Bemardino General Plan cannot be constructed. 1-15 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1-16 2.0 PROJECT f~ESCRIPTION This .section describes the .project Land -uses and traffic characteristics far each of the future horizon years analyzed. 2.1 _Pmject Description The project is bounded by 26th Street to the north, ~ Street to the east, G Street to the west and Arrow View Middle School to the south in City of San Bernardino (see Exhibit 1-A}. The approximately 8.5 acre project site includes 40 existing single family residential units (to be eliminated) and an approximately 31,ggq square foot vacant lot. The access to the project site will be provided via G Street and 26th Street (student drop-off' area). The internal circulation within the parking area along G Street will be configured as one way circulation and will be served by two driveways along G Street The southerly driveway for inbound traffic will be aligned with the existing 24th Street and the northerly driveway for outbound traffic will be aligned with the existing 25th Street . The exclusive student drop- off area will be provided along 26th Street. The drop-off circulation is also configured as one way flaw. 2:2 Project Traffic The traffic related to the project has been calculated in accordance with the following accepted procedural steps: ® Trip Generation ® Trip Distribution w Traffic Assignment 2-1 These steps are described in detail below. 2.2.1 Project Trip Generation For the propased school, the trip generation estimates based on the student enrollment as well as the building square footages have been evaluated. The trip generation calculation is based an the most recent institute of Trans ortation En ineers Tri Generation Rates 7'th Edition. In addition, both the PM peak hour of the generator and the trip generation during the PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic have been evaluated. The trip generation reduction that will result from demolishing the 40 existing homes is also accounted fnr in the trip generation calculations. Table 2-1 presents the trip generation rates based upon the number of students. Table 2~2 summarized the trip generation based on the student enrollment. As indicated in Table 2-2, the proposed development is anticipated to generate a net total of approximately 621 trip-ends per day with 298 vehicles per hour (VPH} during the AM peak hour, 220 vehicles per hour (VPH) during the PM peak hour of the generator and 68 VPH during the PM peak hour of the adjacent street. Table. 2-3 presents the trip generation rates for the proposed schaoE based upon the gross floor area. Table 2-~ summarizes the trip generation for the propased development based on the gross floor area trip rates. As shown on Table 2-4, the proposed development is anticipated to generate a net total of approximately 417 trip-ends per day, with 230 vehicles per hour (VPN} during the AM peak hour, 175 VPH during the PM peak hour of the generator and 29 VPH during the PM peak hour of the adjacent street. As indicated on both Table 2-2 and Table 2~, the 40 dwelling units of to-be~ abandoned residential uses will be subtracted from the school trip generation. The school bus passenger care equivalence (PCF) increase has been added 2-2 TABLE 2-9 ' TRiF~ GNEF2ATION RAT'ES' (BASE() ~N STUDENT ENROLLMENT) PCAK HOUR TRIP RATES ITE AM PM of Generat4r~ PM' t.ANb USE CODIW QUANTI UNITSZ IN OUT TOTAL 1N OtJT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL DAILY Elementa School 520 772 STU 0.23 0.19 0.42 0.13 0.15 0.2$ 0.06 0.08 0.14 1.29 Sin le Famil Residential 210 40 DU 0,19 01.56 0.75 NOM$ NOM NOM 0.64 0.37 i.f31 9.57 ~ Source: ITE (lnstitute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, 2pg3. ~ STtJ =Students; DU =Dwelling Units a PM of Generator = PM Peak Hour of Schoa# Site Generator for both Elememtary School and Single Farnity Residential a The PM peak Haut Trip Rates for Elerrietntary School were Obtained from San Diego Municipal Cade Land Development Gode, Trip General€an Manual, Revised May 2003 a NOtvi =Nominal U:11tcJobsl 03100-035001_03400ti034291Excatl[03429-03.x1s]T 2-1 ~"~ TABLE 2-2 TI~fP GENER;4TfQN SU[~1i111Aft1' (13ASED ON STUDENT E7~F?OLLN#ENT) . PEAK HOUR AM PM of Gerteratar PM LANp US C2UANTf UNITS' IN OUT' TQTAL fN OllT TQTAL IN OUT TOTAL pAILY Llernenta 5ctiool 772 STU 178 147 324 i00 116 218 46 62 iD8 996 Sin ie Fasrtil Residential 40 pU -8 -22 -9D NOM2 NOM NOM -25 -15 -4Q -983 School f3us {PCE fnerease) 2 2 4 2 2 4 0 0 0 8 TOTAL 172 127 298 1 fl2 1 i 8 220 2D 47 68 62i S7U = Sfudents; aU = Dweilfng UnILS ~ NDM = NpFnii{di U:1UcJobsl_03'f {~D-0350D1_D340D1634291Facce3l(f;30.29-03.xts}T 2.2 2--4 TABLE 2-3 TRIP GEN£RATiON RATESi (BASED ON PROP05ED BUitwDING 5L3UAi2E FOOTAGES} PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES iTE AM PM of Generator3 PM4 LAND USE CODE QUANTi UNITS IN OU'1" TOTAL 1N OUT TOTAL IN qUT T03AL DAILY Elemenia Schoai 520 54,65 TSF 2.53 2.16 4.69 1.35 1.78 3,13 0.5 0.78 1.25 14.49 Sin le Famil Residential 210 40 DU 0.19 0,56 0.75 NgMs NOM NOM 0.64 0.37 1.01 9.57 ' Source: ]TE pnstltute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, 2003. a STU =Students; DU = L~watl€ng Units s PM of Gerlerais]r M pM ?eak Mour of Scheol Sile Generator for both Elementary School and Single Family Residential " Ttte f'M Peak Hour Trip Rates far Elementary School were Obtained from San piego Municipal Code Land Development Code, Trip Generatiin Manua9, RevEssd May 2003 ~ tvOr~ =Nominal U:iUcJOb51_03100-035001 03dt1010 3 4 2 91Excel4(03429.03.x1s]T 2-3 -~ TABLE 2~t TRIG' GENERAT)ON SUM~kARY (BASED ON PROPpSEP BUkLD11VG SQUARE_ FOOTAGES) PEAK HOUR AM PM of Generator PM LAND USE QUANTI UNtTS1 IN OUT TOTAL IN pUT TOTAL EN OUT TOTAL pAILY Elements School 54.65 TSF 138 118 256 74 97 179 27 42 69 792 Sin le 1=ami1 Residential 40 f]U -8 -22 -30 NOME NpM NOM -26 -15 ~40 -383 Sehaal Sus (ACE Increase) 2 2 4 2 2 4 0 0 0 8 TOTAL 132 98 '230 78 99 175 1 27 29 417 ° STU =Students; DU ~ Qweiling Uni[5 s NOM =Nominal U:SUsJo5s1 03100-035001_D3R001D34291Fxce1![f13429•D3.xIs)T 2-4 2-6 for the calculation. Based on the draft project description provided by the project team,. only two buses transporting special education students are anticipated as part of the proposed project. It has been assumed that each bus will arrive and leave during the AM peak hour and the PM peak hour of the generator. As shown on Table 2-2 and Table 2-4, elementary school traffic is strongly oriented towards the AM and PM peak hour of the generator (with the AM peak hour of the generator coinciding with the peak of adjacent street traffic). Comparing the trip generation summaries in Table 2-2 and Table 2-~4, the project trip generation based upon the student enrollment represents a more conservative scenario and should be used for the traffic a~ialysis, although the City's comments recommended that the gross floor area square footage to be used far trip generation purposes. The PM peak hour analysis time frame will be fuither discussed in a subsequent section. 2.2.2 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Based on the City's comments (Attachment "A"}, a "select zone" analysis using the EVTM has been used to assist in developing the project trip distribution pattern. The EVTM select zone analysis does not exp[icitiy account for school trips in estimating fihe school project's trip distribution pattern and is unlikely to reasonably represent the detailed characteristics of the distribution of student traffic to and from the project. A select zone analysis has been requested and is provided as Appendix "B" to this report, The select zone analysis has been used to determine the general distribution of longer trips (e.g., trips by staff' and deliveries that are expected to come from outside the anticipated enrollment boundary}. The proposed school project student related trip distribution can be better developed based on the location of surrounding residential land uses, the anticipated school enrollment boundary, and the major street network for 2-7 teachers, staff and general deliveries to the school. The project trip distribution pattern is illustrated an Exhibit 2-A. It is based an the evaluation of the local conditianslcharacteristics cited previously, as well as the EVTM select zone analysis results. As indicated on Exhibit 2~A, 70% of the praject trips will be distributed to the residential area within the estimated school enrollment boundary and 30% will be distributed outside the boundary far trips related to teachers, staff, working parents and defveries. These percentages are based upon review of the inbound and outbound traffic relationships for the AM peak hour. The praject only traffic forecasts have been generated by applying the trip generation, distribution and traffic assignment calculations. The Project traffic volumes are the criteria determining the limits of the analysis. Exhibit 2..g illustrates the praject only traffic contribution test volumes (AM peak hour) for the proposed project. Due to the fact that the project AM peak hour trip generation is higher than the project PM peak Dour of generator and the PM peak hour trip generation, only AM volumes have been examined. 2.2.3 Baseline Traffic Count Data Analysis The City's comment letter raised two Essues related to traffic characteristics in the vicinity of the project site (Appendix "A"). The first issue is the peaking characteristics of traffic within the study area, while the second issue is the amount of traffic currently using the streets that are proposed to be vacated as part of the project. These issues have been addressed via a preliminary baseline traffic count program. Urban Crossroads, inc. conducted a baseline traffic count program consisting of 24 hour daily traffic volume counts for 8 locations nearby the praject site. The 8 daily traffic count facatic~ns are identified an Exhibit 2-C. The traffic count program results are also summarized on Exhibit 2-C. Appendix "C" includes the 24 hour traffic count worksheets. Charts ~XH[BIT 2-A ,.~. ^ ~' ~ p ~N ~N N ON 66 * 7 ~ 26T}i ST. I +F' 1R4 8 6 14 12 8 ~ q ~ ~ r" ~ + v7 W Cn ] ~ V1 ~ N~ & ~ C] ~ C7 ~ O u, 4 w ~ ,. ~ •, A ~ @ ¢ ~ ^' CCIJRTLAND DR. Lo 27TH ST. ~ ~ ~ ~ m'°" ~ 277H 5T. y 27TH 5T. 00 ~ ~.3 26TH ST.~ I ~COURT[AND [1R. 2 $ _ z~__ 11 26TH 5T. 2 $ ~ ~~, i ~3''a'..:y;E:i;'i:'.;; j 2 ~ _ 25TH ST u!E ___„,„ ^ ~ ~, S : { 2g 25THST >' irws; ~FiSI7.~j »°74 a"p a,~_ 6 N6A. ~f~?-'<~,I ~ : ~~a - .i 25TH ST. p ~ 1 25TH 57. i B+3 ~~~~7^r,,j 25TH ST. ~ 5---__ ~ ~ ~tf" , : 25TH sT. eq ~ i .'pfd ', } 14 13 s'~ 24TH 5T. 3t p 2 5 ~ - 25TH 5T. O5 24Thi ST. - ~ zkTiN ST, m ~ ~~N 2 ~ m TAlBOUAfIJ 1 I 2 \\~{7R BE AAANDONEfJ} r. +a-J 23RQ ST, ~ 3 9 17 FiEGHLAND Ad. 2 1D ~ 3 7 ~ i en ^ N i 2757 ST. 21ST 5T, ~ 0 1 2oTk ST 1 R 1-.~ cAr~PUS wY 1..~_ ~ ~, 1 ~ 1 ~ 10 = PERCE[VT TO/FROM[ PROJECT -.~ 79713 ST. -.+a-• I ~ -- = 011TBOUidp `" "' ~ = It~iBOUND ~ 1srH 5T .?,~ 1aTH sT. y ------ Y N 1 N Z $ wr& 17TH 5T. 1 ~ 1 nTH sr, ~ gg 17TH ST. g& 9 ~ GGd t ~ Fes,,,, 76TH 5T. 1 ~~1 '"'~ lNfL50N {I ELEMEE~ITARY SCHOOL, San BernartEino, California - 03429: Ef3 z-9 EXHIBIT 2-B ~,~ g ~---~'~`~_` ~ 6~CGKiTOiit>~~TfIDAP 4p nm'1tl%~OE~RD bfst4 Ckavlfgg a4 ~yt~onx~~saanesam~n.t mmec~rnat B p4 6~ w p~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ 28TH ST. F ~ ~ ~ I ~ 27T}3 ST. ~ 3 3 9 ~ COtJRTLAI~€B f3R. en ~ D ~ 1 r7 I\ 26TH ST. ~ hj~ ~ ~ G ~ ~2 26TH 5T. ~ ~ 25TH ST. la ~::-:~::::~::,.:.~ . .,... ,_ ? 9& i::.~.:.~.::..(~,F..::::::..: i 25TH ST. ~ tt.~ ~ ~ ,::.....~:..~r.~.:::-::.. , o I - u.ila 39 e. ~ ~ O 24TH ST. ~ E___._ .maxL ---~i 25TH ST. ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ $ --(rn sE Asanrrao~v~~i} ~ 23RB ST. ~ G b ~ ~ r ~ ~ i HIGHLANB AV. '~ 27 59 30 95 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ LEGEN®: 92 =LINK VOLEIMI: = SC}•EUOL ATTENQANCE B013N©Aft`( tN€LSgN €I ELEMEN'i'A€TY 5CHC7DL, San Bernardino, California - 03429: O6 ...,... -- .,~._... QSGRPPfJS 2-10 EXHIg~T 2-C 2fi5 130 OF / OF PEAK VOLU_ ME DA€LY PEAK VOLUME DAILY AM ~ 16 6.OA % AM 4 3.A6 _ Akemaan 27, 1A.19% Aftomoon 11# 8.46% ' PM ~ 261 9.83 % PM 16 12.31% f/S. ~ ~ ~ ~ LL W 27TH ST. OUF2TLA D C3R. 2ss ' r of PEAK VOLUME DAILY RM 17 W~6.32% 26TH ST. Allemoon 3n ,1.15^ r 2&TH PM 35 13.05 - `----- ----i , I' , '' ~.'..'rr....'. ~•.', ' 2,334 `..,.;. ,~.,rr.':.'~ 1... ;::.,. OF 25TH ST. j~ ~, ~ ~ ~ B,A87 PEAK VOLUME DAILY t'.iiir~.c: '~;,.,~ ! / OF ~r~"~''~'a 25TH ST. PEAK voLUME (DAILY AM 14+3 6.18 % I':. -,r.- . ('~~L~r.:.v:.:~,v:r!i AM T52 8.0C°h ' C[~l' %~+, : is r'', : ':.~ Afternoon 214 9.181 +..'. -'..r.D]I~...,:.),l Aft©maoh 682 8.fl4% pn1 .....I m 202 8.67% I"~' ' ~ --~. ~ :..- 25TH $T. PM ~ 86a'~10.a2% 24TH ST. f~. i ~`' ----- ~\, V ~-. {~rn se Asan~oo~~~} 23RL1 ST. 1 t 4,632 ~ ~ HIGHLAND AV. % of l Pc_AK 'VpLUF~1E pAllY AM ~~~-~ A24 8.7}°/ ` Aflemaan _ 3gl 8.09% PM 453 9.88 k 25,635 65d °!°OF %pF PEAK VOLUME !DAILY PFAK _ VOLUME DAILY AM 1.453 5.67% RM 29 A.43% Afternoon 1,816 7.101 Aflamoon 69 9.17% PM 1,979 7.72% PM ~ 6Y 8.33% I<m~~i~l~if~°v ' AVERAGE DA3LY TRAFFIC % OF PEAK VOLUME DAILY AM~W~~ (T:60.9:C0AMy Afternoon (2:00.4:00 PM} PM ~ ;A:60 - 6:60 PM) - = 24-i•EOUR TUBE COUNTS LOCATION (PEAK SETWI:EN 2:110 PNt - 4:00 PM) 24HOUR TUBE CE?UNTS LOCATION (PEAK k3ETWEEN 4:00 PNi - 6:00 PM) =SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNDARY 1NIL501V li ELEIVkI:NTARY SCHp(3L, San Bernardino, California - 03429: p7 2-'} 1 illustrating the traffic temporal distribution during the overall afternoon and evening PM peak period have afro been prepared and are included as Appendix "D" to this report. As indicated in Appendix "D", Chart 1 through Chart 8 show the hourly traffic distribution patterns every 15 minutes over a 6 hour time frame between 12:00 Noon to 6:00 PM for the 8 locations. Chart 9 shows the average hourly traffic distribution starting every 15 minutes over the 0 hour period for ail 8 locations. The first issue is the peaking characteristics of the existing traffic on the roadway system compared to the traffic peak for the proposed elementary school. The elementary school peak traffic generation is expected fio occur between 2:00 PM and 4:00 PM, while the peak of traffic on the arterial roadway sysfiern typically occurs between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The PM peak of traffic on roadways carrying more than 4,000 vehicles per day (VPD} occurs during the typical time frame of 4:00 PM to 0:00 PM. The three locations that fall into this category are: H Streefi, south of Highland Avenue; Highland Avenue, west of G Street; and ® E Street, north of 25th Street. All three of these locations are designated as arterial roadways (Secondary Arterial or greater} on the City of San Bernardino Circulation Element Roadway Classification map. The PM peak hour of traffic on the remaining roadways where traffic count data was collected varies, however, the difference in the traffic volume between 2:00 - 4:00 PM and 4:00 _ 6:00 PM is relatively small (less than 15 vehicles in all cases}. This includes G Street, which is designated as a 2-12 Secondary Arterial. G Street is lightly traveled by arterial roadway standards, carrying only 2,300 vehicles per day (VPD) in the vicinity of the project site. The second issue of concern expressed by the City of San Bernardino was the volume of traffic that will be displaced by tide ;proposed vacation of Berkeley Avenue and 25th Street, as well as the volume of traffic on 26th Street. As shown on Exhibit 2-C, the 24-hour traffic counts indicate that the two roadway segments that are proposed to be vacated carry relatively low traffic volumes. Berkeley Avenue on the school site currently carries ~ 30 VPD, while 25th Street on the proposed school site carries 654 VPD. The vacation of the two roadway segments will be addressed by diverting traffic currently on 25th Street to 26th Street as part of the analysis. The traffic on Berkeley Avenue appears to be strictly related to the adjacent houses, therefore, na further actionlanalysis is expected to be necessary related to Berkeley Avenue traffic. The City has also expressed concerns about the traffic on 26th Street. As shown on Exhibit 2~C, traffic count data indicates that 26th Street carries 265 VPD, with ~6 vehicles per hour ~VPH) during the AM peak hour and 2~ VPH during the PM (afternoon) peak hour. 2.2.4 Recommended Analysis Locations and Time Periods Based on the results of the baseline traffic count program, combined with the information previously presented regarding the anticipated project peak hour traffic volume contribution to the roadway system, it is recommended that the local intersections, including intersections where G Street is the major street, use the PM peak hour of the generator for traffic analysis. Traffic counts for these intersections will be conducted between 2:00 PM and 4:00 PM. The intersections along the more heavily traveled 2-13 arterial roadways will experience heavier volumes and are more likely to be impacted during the "typical" PM peak hour (of adjacent street traffic). Traffic counts at these locations will be conducted between 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM. Exhibit 2-D presents the recommended intersection analysis locations. Based on the criteria of ~0 peak hour trips on the arterial system or 1 DO peak hour trips on the freeway system, all intersections which serve more than 50 peak hour project ,trips will be included in the analysis. A .number of additional intersections along the loco( and arterial street system where the project contributes less than 50 peak hour trips are also included in the analysis. These additional intersections have been included to ensure that potential project impacts have been fully evaluated. The analysis will be completed either for the peak of the generator (where the project traffic is likely to result in the highest traffic volumes during the overai[ PM peak period}, or far the "typical" peak hour of adjacent street traffic. The AM peals hour of the generator and the adjacent street traffic are assumed to coincide and will be analyzed for all intersections. The following proposed PM peak period analysis locations are based an PM peak hour of the adjacent street traffic: H Street (NS) at. w Highland Avenue (EW} G Street (NS) at; Highland Avenue (EW) E Street (NS) at: 28th Street (EW) Highland Avenue (EW) 2-'i ~ EXHIBIT 2-D F~kY~In~• YIYY~A [6 CHYS lY ytgyY tp~YC YfA'R~ I yYyaYwcm as~v+y Yn~er R~ 4 d~ ~y pp~ '` P 6 pig pp q' 6 v ?~' ~ 28TH ST. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ 27TH ST. ~ ~ COIJRTLAND DR. ~ '~ 2STH ST. ~ ~ 26TH ST. ~ 25TH ST. ..,~~.. ~ Q ::.'~ ~.......:....a 25TH 5T. ~z ~ i::::.:::: to ~ ::.:::ual:7:::::'::~a ~ 0 24TH ST. ~v. . ~::~-~:_:_:_~ ~ r~ ~ - ~C d ~ . U {TC1 BE ABANDONE[}) 23RD 5T. ~ ~ { = HIGHLAND AV. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = RECCENiMENDl=E3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION -PEAK OF GENERATOR (PM COUNTS BETWEEN 2:OOPM -4:OOPM} O = RECQMMENT3Ep INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION - PEAK OF Ap1ACE1~lT STREET {PM CDU NT5 BETW>=EN 4:OOPM - 6:OOPM} = SCHOOL ATTENDANCE BOUNpARY V1/1L5ON II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, San &ernardino, California-03429: OS 2-15 The following proposed analysis intersections are based on the PM peak hour of the generatar (proposed elementary schaol) PM peak periad analysis: G Street (NS) at: 28th Street (EW) ® Courtland Drive (EW) Westerly 26th Street (EW) ® Easterly 26th Street {EW) 25th Street {EW) 24th Street {EW) 23rd Street (EW) l= Street (NS) at: ® 26th Street {E'J~1} Project only ADT volumes are presented on Exhibit 2-E. Project only AM peak haur traffic forecasts are depicted on Exhibit 2-F, while Exhibit 2-G presents project only PM peak hour project traffic forecasts. 2-`I 6 m~ ~ ~ -----__ -_ ..-_ "--~ ~rr.mxn~iamaarea~ereswermes~- exow~xat~rr~r.ef sav errsayr ~ ~^' iBRgFpYA~sv~ . ~/ x Play r.»-~~.._...-.-. ~4' ~' 1~ ~ M"r' + ~ NOM 28TH ST. (},1 0.1' 0.1 ~ _ l+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ 27TH ST. NOM ~ n COU~ZTLRNt3 i;]R. ~ ,~ NOM ~ 26TH ST_ ° ~ NOM `~'. 0.2 26TH ST. o ~ o 28TH 5T. o ~Q~Z ~ a ,° ~ Q NOM ~JT'~S r 25TH ST. - ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ 24TH 5T. ~0;.2_.__~~__._.-__~ ¢ ~ ~ NOM ~ ~ g U ~ ~ 23RL1 ST. ~ ~ NOM ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 0.1 0.1 HIGi-11"ANC) Av. NOM ~ 0.1 0 p 10.0 =VEHICLES 3'ER €3AY ('E000'S} NOM = NOM4NAL, LESS THAN 50 VEHICLES PER RAY 1NILSON 31 ELEIIRENTARY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, California - 63429: 11 -~-_----.._ _.___-_~. °~~'~--"~'°AgS 2-17 EXHIBIT 2~I; _ ~, ~~x a.p~p CSnsmi~xemn/sr~~~~~n 1+'~rr~mi4l~~tKt Fym ~,~y~.v,a~wsM~r~avsm e~~te tae ~ x p' ~ a~~- ~ P L.. o ~o ~ --0 noo .,_14 0~ ,i 2aTH ST. ~ ~ ~' my m r.t 27TH ST. ~.- ~ COURTLAND DR. ~ ~r } ~ x-26 ~--~~ ~ 26TH ST. ~_~.~.---~° _ t f ~ .2frTH-5T°~~ ~ ~,..-.-- - - j 25TH ST. 3:::: i ~ is .:,:,. ¢ 25TH ST. ~`-+c~ ~ ~ F (' ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~., 7 '17~~~0 ~ 24TH 5T. i~:_-_==---_-- + T N ~ ~ a ~ Q - V o°co ~2S ~ 23RD ST, ~ bJ } ~ ~=-as ~ Q~,Q ~ 1°~ ~ HIGHLAND AV. ~ ~ i ~ x ~ ~ 000 0 ma ~rn~ x--17 ~ gyn.- l 6 ~9 ooh 6 T c'N ` o~cs 0~ orn~m 4--- r~rmo -~ -~ g-_-} ,- WlLSE)N I! ELEMENTARY SCHOpL, San Bernardina, California - 03423: 03 >LDR~LkB~ l ~'i EXHIBIT 2-G ffi sR~~R~srm~sRmnssamaaa~nprsa ®weas® %%emsaem ss R1~ % ~R%~x%1 TAfta RR amNY1~ p Rt~ R GY ~RY %a 4....p ` p 4hq .gyp oO -r-- Q~~f~ ~F ~ i p~ RR 8 ~4 ~ 28TH ST. n F^ ~ -rMV© ~p F- C~fJ v7 uy ~ ~ ,~3 cn ~ ~ L7 U.. ~ D---- "'~ ~ rv~ m 27TH ST. ~ COURTLP,Nd dR. op ~ 26TH ST. ~ ~ ' ~ ~ t::•::•:::; r ~ 25TH ST. r:; . :...:.::.:.:::.:::::•::::j ? r::.:.::;. 5~ ::.:.:,• , ::.t 25TH ST. ~l ~ _ ~ i x::~ ~ ~ ~ r::•::::::::::::::.:::::::::: O 24TH ST. ~:_~•_:~::~.~___:,__:_a J ~ 7g~ Q Q r U ' ~-za ~ ~ 23RD ST. ~ ~ ~ t=ao ' o-- own 6 T HIGHLRND AV. a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-a ~, ~z N~, ~ -o ! a p" "~ } (" z-e `1 ~ a-3 ~1 t f" p--~ ~ a t" u-~ °I ~ f" 2-a- oarv 0-~ ous p-a r~,-o 5^-'• ainiv 1-~ ~ o p-4 m 0--p 0-} m 3 "} COUNTS CONDUCTED DURING PEAK OF THE ADJACENT STREET (4:QD P.fVi. ~ 6:00 P.M.) OTHER COUNTS CONDUCTED DURING PEAK OF THE GENERATOR (PROJECT) (2:00 P.M. ~ 4:D0 P.M.) WfLSC}N fl f~i.EMEfsITARY SCf-1C3C~l., San 6ernardino, California - 03429: 1Q THIS QAGE iNTENT[C.INALLY LEFT BLANK 2-2~ ~.a ExlsTl~l~ co~lD~Tio~s This section of the report summarizes existing roadway and traffc conditions in the study area. The number of through travel lanes for existing roadways and intersection controls are presented, along with existing traffic count data collected for this study. This data was used to analyze existing traffic operations in the study area. 3. ~ Existing Roadway System and ,Daily Tragic Vol€~mes The existing intersection controls and number of through lanes within the study area are presented an Exhibit 3-A. Highland Avenue through the study area is a four lane divided roadway. E Street is a tour lane undivided roadway north of Highland Avenue and a two lane undivided roadway south of Highland Avenue. All other roadways within the study area are two lane undivided roads. Exhibit 3-B depicts the existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes in the study area. As illustrated, Highland Avenue carries up to 25,000 vehicles per day {VPD) within the study area. 28th Street carries up to 1,600 VPD, while E Street carries a maximum ADT of 1 ~ ,700. The reminder of the roadways within the study area carry less than 10,000 VPD. Existing ADT volumes are based upon recent trafFc data collected by Urban Crossroads, lnc. in January, 2007 (see Appendix "C") Estimated ADT volumes have been calculated by Urban Crossroads, lnc. based on the peak hour intersection counts using the fo[lawing formula for each intersection leg: (AM Peak Haur {Approach -~ Exit Volume} +PM Peak Haur {Approach + Exit Volume)) / {6.6% ~- 8.2%) = Daily Leg Volume. In the above formula, the constants of 6.6% and 8.2% are calculated AM and PM Peak Hour to ADT ratios based an the actual count data collected and included in Appendix "A". Regional access to the site is provided by the State Route 30 (SR-30) Freeway and State Route 259 {SR~259) Freeway. Local access is provided by various arterial and local roadways in the vicinity of the site, 3..1 EXHIBIT 3-A _____-______ -----_,ti.._.__- . e '~rFTM°a ~ Y1USg'Y e4 ~ q' ~ ~""'~"' COURTIAND 1~ pR. ~ ~e. N 28TH S7. ~ I' 2U 2U 2U 2U N 26TI~t ST, ~ d Y ~ ~ ~ ~ g } ~ ~ N ~ B. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ - - ~ 3 i 27TH 5T. - ^5EE ENSkT A" ~~t}_7~ Yl« i~ 25Th sT. COlJRT4AND G'P., i'- "1 g~g • ~ p ~ _ 26TH 5T. ;, ~ t `"t 26TH ST. 25TH ST. ~ ' ~'~ ..WJ, ,;,I ~ ~ } ~ ~ 25Ti-{ 5T. ~az.;~ ~{,,~~~.~`F 25TH ST. i ~ W~} ~ +yE N p 24TH ST. x " ~.~,_,-,u` _3 25TH ST. Y ~ 24TH ST. r qq` ~ °_sre;:, ~_- - '~ A a -} ! 1 U ~ p !E 23RD ST. 23R05T, b~ N ~ ~ p~ N HIGH~,4ND AV. @ 4p 4b QD 4p ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ E N N N - ~ ~ .».i.-. ;~- ..r ~- .# l ~ ee p!~ ®®~~gg~~ -fir. I a.w~~~IM 0.A: =TRAFFIC SEGNAL Q- =STOP 51GN 4 = NUMBER OF LANES B = DIVIdEp U = UNdIVIdED 1NILSON It fLE~VSENTARY SCHOOL, San Bernardina, Cal~#amia - 03429: 12 _ .v.._. ryY ~ Qa AS W XNfBIT 3-B ~ ~ --______ -~.___ ~..-~"'~ !!@.1ffi¢¢C9riih16M¢A 4T~,RYl ~cCh46l~iP!l hLn hlaaSlYYfmC~~}. a4¢'~!i%¢+as!l V~6hia¢!4¢aasalaaicY W !ice ' s~,,,....~..... ~ s ~b~p 4 i n t7i 28TH ST. ~.5 7.6 1,6 7.4 x ~ ( ~ 27TH sT. ~ m ro CQURTLAND QR. ~ ° Q 0.7 26TH ST. `"~ M ~ Q,2 ti 0.3 26TH ST. o C c*i ~ ~l 25TH ST. M ~,y o p 0.9 f.. SrT~ . i 25TH ST. = ~ ~ M c.::::. ~ ~ ~ 24TH 5T. i___.____ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.5 - ----- ~ c U N = 23RC} ST. ~.7 ~ cv co Cv cri ui o HfGNLAND AV. 24.6 25.6 23.4 22,E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~' ~ ~ ~a.~G~~~n 1(].0 = VEHICLE5 PER DAY {1406'5) WlL50!`J 1! ELEMENTARY 5CH£]C1L, San Bernardino, California - 03429: 27 K~ f 3.2 Existing Peak Hc~ur.Traffc Volumes Existing intersection, level of service calculations are based upon manual AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts conducted specifically for Urban Crossroads, lnc., as shown an Exhibit 3-C and Exhibit 3-D. Peak period trafl=lc counfi worksheets are included in Appendix "E". The AM peak hour traffic volumes were determined by counting the two-hour period between 7 - 9 AM in the morning. Similarly, the PM peak hour traffic volumes were identified by counting the twahour period from 2 - 4 PM for 8 intersections and 4 - 6 PM far four (4) intersections in the evening as discussed in Section 2. 3.3 Existin Traffic D erations Existing peak hour traffic aperatians have been evaluated far both the AM and PM peak hours throughout the study area: The results of this analysis, along with the existing intersection geometries and control devices afi each analysis location are summarised in Table 3-1. As indicated in Table 8-1, all of the study area intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service during the peak hours. The aperatians analysis worksheets for existing conditions are included in Appendix "~„ Traffic signal warrant analysis has been conducted for all unsignali,ed intersections under existing conditions. As indicated in Appendix "G', no intersections currently warrant a traffic signal. 3.4 Planned Trans ortatian lm rovements and Relationshi s to General Plan The County of San Bernardino General Plan Circulation Element and roadway cross-sections are shown on Exhibit 3-E and Exhibit 3-l=. The City of San Bernardino General Plan Circulation Element and roadway cross-sections are depicted on Exhibit 3-G and 3-H, respectively. As illustrated, Highland Avenue and E Street are designated as Major Arterial while H Street and G Street are Secondary Highways within the study area. ~--4 EXHIBIT 3~C -~_._ ' ~- sstrxnexmmx narrm~ra e»m sr asnsas~.ra wnraamiramv~. ~xya~ruc~comsb.c~rsm~acros+a or ixs~~~ ~'`' 11~ , ---- ~ 31-~-~~ ~ 32~~t{~ - 1~ `T Nti'N ~~-~ •-W ~a. H ® 28TH ST. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1- 1- rnN ~1fi )- ra~- ® t ~ 3--y rnm mrP rn 27'('1-€ ST. ~ --''' ~ COURT~RD p~ Q~ a _ _ ~ t` la„ f---s 26TH ST. ~ ~ ~' 25TH ST, t-:::::::::;::: ...:::::::::::1 w ? r.:'-:::(~;:;~~~~:~::::i 25TH ST. w ~ I , ~ ~ 24TH ST. r.~'mmmm~:-~~."::_:_:_•_:,i J ~- s ? Q \ ~_"'~ ~ © ~ ~ ~I-, ~~-~ ss-~ j ~ HIGHLRNt~ AV. -~~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /_ -~~ - L.588 mm ~m~ ~53y e»rno -~--Q nM~ 4-49 sss-~ ~1 } ~ ~s~ dm ss9~ ~ t ~ ~-~ ~ # ('" y~6~ ~l t f" 55-~ w°wm r a~.o qg-~ ea~rv Zq-} Yv,. 713-}! w~v W1LSpN 11 E[.EI~/IENTARY SCHddL, San Bernardino, California - D3429: 13 M1~W EXHiB6T 3WD m _~-~~ -m ~.liY~iII~[Y5~'IC mNAC1fY~StRhC[bt Y~E[IE EYf1 •Y. py tC t6e6ti1TJa~Gt pF0 ii~piq pae'ac~ ' Y Y~jO~ Y ~x bm_ d ~ ~ E..._7 ~, ~ } l..,~.1 ~ I } N M ; u ~ ~ -~ nrv 7~ e-m~rv "~' ~ 2$TH 5T. !' om 27TH ST. : -''~~ ~ k CaURTLANCI fJfj.~ m~ , 7 ~ . ` ~' } ~ T ~,~... 26TE-i ST. µ 1 ~ N t ~ ~ 25TH 5T. r.:.r:. ~.:::::::;:::::,: ~::,: ~ ~ ;,:'':':':' ~~~.~'::,~,,:i 25TH 5T. j ~ ~ ~ O 1:....v:.:.:-r:.::,~:r: lZ~ o,a C7 ~ 24TH ST. r,mm~ mm.~,~. ~ ~ ~I d ~ ~ ~ twa ,~.$ ~ 23RD ST. _ ,,,) } ~ p ~ o"lff ~ m.-a 4~t r I HIGHLAND AV, ~ \ \ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~, _ mwv i 304'1 as mmu"'i X51 m~roa ~ •-c~am i 92 inwn rt-1U36 ~--4 1 `fl ~ n 886 3 846 ~ y~ } ~ 25-1 yl t 7g73~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~c. 88°rt a~~ -~ COUNT5 GONDUGTED €~UR1NG PEAK OF THE ADJACENT STREET (4:00 P.M. - fi:00 P.AlI.} OTHER COUNTS GONDUCTEI3 DURING PEAK OF THE GENERATOR (PROJECT} (2:00 P.M. -- 4:OD P. M.} WILSDIV li ELEMENTARY SCHddL, San Bernardino, California -(13429: 14 .~_............-. ..............._,.......... ~ .~..-..-......_.......~.,._.~,....._~_..___. ......--..-.. .,,_____ o_sraoaos ~'"~ TABLE 3~1 ENTERSECT'!ON ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS iNTERSECTEON APPf~OACH LANES' NORTH- 50UTH- EAST WEST- t)ELAYZ LEVEL OF TRAFFIC BOUNi) BgUNO BOUND BC3UNq (BEGS.) SERVICE tNTER5ECTION CONTROL' L T R L T R L T R L T R AM f'M AM PhA H St. {N5) at: Highland Av, {EWj TS 0.5 0.5 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 18.8 11.0. B B G St. {NS) at: ° 28th St. {EW) CSS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 12.4 9.6 B A Caurtiand Dr. {EW} CSS 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 4 D 0 1 0 9.8 9.4 A A ° 26#h St. West {EW} CS5 D.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9.9 9.0 A A 26#h St. East {EW) CS5 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.1 9.6 B A 25th St. {EW} CS5 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9.7 9.7 A A ° 24th St, {EW) CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10.7 9.3 B A ° 23rd St. {EW) CSS C}.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10.2 9.5 B A Highland Av. {EW) 'TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 '0 16.3 10.6 B B F St. {NS} at: 26th St. East {EW) GSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Cf 0 8.5 8.6 A A E St. (NS} at: 28th St. {EWj CSS 0,5 1.5 0 0.5 1.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 21.1 19.8 G G ° Hi hland Av. EW TS 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 28.9 30.5 C G When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a tight 1um lane there must be sufficie_ nt width for right taming vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Lek; T = Through; R =Right z E?elay and level of service calculated using the following analysis sokware: Traffix, Version 7.6.0.38 (2003). Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manua?, overall average intersection delay and level of service era shown tar intersections with traffic trat~c signal or all way stop control, For'tniersact€ons with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for worst indiv'sduai movement (ar movements sharing a single lane) are shown. a TS =Traffic Signal CS5 =Cross Street Stap AW5 =Ail Way Stop -- _ ©elay High> Intersection tJns#ai71e, Level of Service "F". U:IUcJabsl_03t OD-0350C71_034001034281Exceil[03429-03.x1s)T 3-9 -7 EXII~IT 3-E ~ ~ ~ > ~ .-, d r~ n. ;Q Iva-~ ui r ° # ~ ,~ E ~ E -~U ..fit ~ ~'` ~ E 4 1k13 ,~....~. ~,, r s ,, ~ ~ ~# ~ t ~ i rF w. ~ ~ ^ ~- _ M. Y ~ ~ ,~ ~' x ~ L`, ~ ~ 4 U 1 4 ~ ~ ~ rrr -: •,V 1~J ..M C.~Y ,~ l~ M, a ~ ~S 1 ~I ~~1 ~-.c:... , ~ ~ r+ r ~ xt k ~ -. ~ '+~ ~ RI~. E' P e - 7. i ..fir s ~ ,~ ~ -~~ ~ E ~ ~, -fib ~d~T ~ s I` ~ s a E 1 g ~ ? 19.E 4% I § i -~' ~- ~y :r. 1 ~ i rz' _ ~ rz>, d pl., E 73~T Spa ~ ,~ ~ 41s.., f ~ ~ ~ S f 1~ ~ A ~ ~'J ~ r,_ lam, ~ ~ ~ i tk' ~ "3"'n u,. ~ f '. r r ~ i~` ~ f~ ij€ ~1 ,~ ti :~' ~~..i.~ ~ I E 9:, ~ I _ f ~ ~ ~ § 1 ~ r -"" ~ C ~ ~' Eti ~1 a ~ a ~ ,, r ~ ~ { ' ~' '. $ i r' i fi '~,~ ~ t "' E 1 r~ ~ ~ 3~`' t r ~ J 9~TI-I ST ~ 77 _ ~ 5 ~ 2 T4..F.A~-a ~ ~ .Y 1~ .'f ~ t ctl' ~ .,r... i 1 . _,n.,. . ~ n . '. Circktlatian and Transportation EXISTING Pi2QF'pSEf~ cx...»~- hsa ra r..~ c ~ m ec al.~lni f+;vEllnlE t~t~~,~.v:n• .-::.,-,:~~:: ~;:;<;:I;.,,.~ r, e; c:~ ~~., .:.' A';.ggr ld7gluv~p. C•s;.y,.. _...-a....-y ~- r,y ea k.. a x,.~z,„ny I II~„ m' G;a ~ m ~ ~ [ n~rnn:'rJrE En,';r~l hrr.,,,c nl'wm: F:^.^L'.^._'Y:1,~'.vy~.~:^.i CY 1s: i,'. F'~ 1, \lu::tVY:n \4.,I:it 4'1: }!!Itt':n• G....t.i.'~'S.L:,ii...., Ibl F:i i... u.. S.Y r, ~ln.l>`1nif1 WMnr,.1N i liNi,,:R' ~;"~s~^....M.z~ r-~ ra c~ ~s c~ s .,~iC I I F~~•.:~.:`i~~~c~.~i SanA:erk artond':4m~: VlIILSON El ~L~MENTARY SCH{)Ol., San Bernardino, Cal'rfornia - 03429:29 _ __.._.n._.....___W. =RO~~ao„~~ ~-~ ~XH~~IT 3-~ ® l - _ ~ ,,. R,w tl rC i sxp.c It /''' G ctYwc ~I ~ ' ~I ~__-.....,.. x•.. I ~ ~r_ I i . w CVPa n aVr3tR S[L xG!ri ~ 310[tri[a- I ~ L_ ~ `:t 7YFICA~,S ECT Ip}~} ;s,,,_,L:~ ~ \(r~~~v-%«~i ~ L I C0' I [YE_ W CRN+TE 53GYViMUC / m~'`'"^:c'3„-...' ~' tr nr sxvnr Px rt.f.1 !1 1. ~pxPr i-R•I ~2-. ~~'ii al C i a fR [n rL=YSS' i --MJ;.C~ _---.-lc W T,. of G A? SF.C T,.,~ I..J TYPICAL SECTtOM1 T31.T N~'FES: + a ~ e a L sTRVxrulw. scctwor 'er .la.w.+r sxcLt se ntxexxiN¢a reap saes rrsrc 0.14 ' oai ~uN so exua[a o 6" CUR& LGv[t ~a]aL' a]C r fsrRvv:ax rL~ Tlir t ~ i~sl' I O.LV' A.XA' I ?, HArEm E~t'kn:~ ar g[ t•hi Snn[L tl: ^pupd YAK 43L'ML Vr3. N u vAxfCa P• L.pun [tpu c Sng3 R[rpXr. Ex C1f78 4E VCt 0.00" iix`.0}1 ~ pf9' l 1 vrsuiSS .Rwr rtLY ! p]b 0.c3' ~ qyY ~ L,3S' LN0. LIhC Ir~TE , L YYNVSTVFAL 3a G'IF Lr RpsnwfY SNaLt r! pLTC nk3NCC edOk 3plLS T. STS Rh[ y0 w pN CLNStA V[1i0r PL rx3, L ~ x OC+[N+nv,~•c sfi•[N.x[Sa srµt Rc p,2~ +Srnu~ xar.~nL-i, CTh:SYAVCripx GLYLtLE a/+ xxy R•auiNt StNr (+••{4nCNT S. snn Bennnnnuo cwNrY TTtaN,>. v."dr sax e~warmsxo rmrxrr aa:o aEnnpruEt;: MOUN TAIh' L9C AL CtltdTgClL~p LIMETEp Y.EN a. w=.;.'._r~ TCCE55 CtlLl,EC 70R Ir73R ~ v~~--z KEN A, 91;, l.Ert ~ PAVED ROAC 1146 CilealaM wnntPMr9P~o0 3~ G2hae ar T:enapp^tatKn • 3.Ix R/v ° ~ se "i rtj/fw~ c I -. I _ l4 _ ( sy t tl• 4 ~ ~ ~SLOre r a ~ lLlat Lwc ~p 1 rl • ~ i y atoac y»--- " I I ~ x _ w~. Sze koxco'° `- srsr..cx --"--~-.. I% I'.? ,._c'=.. •r, ~Nl'~ I ~-ev,peevrYCp ~_...~W i --e^•a "~s[--.~;c-~-_.-+~~"4C".~-+~ TYPICAlw S£C:Tlpdt ~~..,,..-.. a-11 `'. e~Re n cure[.. ~EV~.ar +IYERN.rsF slxwdex t TYPE;RL S~,C~lCE4T 1 m sxwx w ~y.wl -_ _ ' ~vr~ c ' • ~u-reE Gam. --~-.....~....~.._.x_~ sT_i=,._..~"_ +~."'"""~ ~~~' a ~ I t ~Ixt., f ....-saY. LO~--^- TYPICAL SECTIOhr I T34' 7YPlCA,L SECTI Ctt Ti:3 x E t c [ - 6" CVR_ scvLt w.pn p» p.~ oax 1 ` ~ I _ sl:r I as i..m ~ e.av cse a" co to `eve. p.oY ' ~ c N L[vr, p.ro c.;~ ~loas} a.ri [ I Ix tcs-cnx .nova P~•I ~ ost as Lzv' 6• CU ~aH Lee [ }ad3' S3Y ~r.39' •'• e'CnxO Y Of: G.v t+~:' VC7E styvcrortr•. sec kPN v L aL prYa,nk,uap rxsu sorts rrsrs N0T'c ~ ' man<« °x xavSYAHt9x drllxr. blfiuSTVR:L eerrP.x a' a: ec ::e«os[a /Ar+. SuLS rrssr a Y cu acslax NL nacaRCSr dxett e[ azs' .sain:x epNeesrr. .x a Inpwirm aY c:stcial~'c'i~ni a:L<:"¢~;' s co-tsrrcrenpn a~rnst >,/r .a,; RGaw9d. aws[ zu[veurs, r wtnekvN ars+r+>arlxe rkcwzESS sN+tL :f ezs ts•K[a •oxexr.: +caGTRLCnox onapz x S~eN: rasaacs:a . vrav PNrreatxG sLecxxu~ r,ts a;, tc~-r>,.•." ~ a•• +x¢ src_ scrernl• :x<tL se t `•d!1 a£ktiAR61>f0 LbVlrTY FOAO 3GrpP1MCHi RaCi_•im~ drk:x. Lfr, au x~j» Y ~~p ro !.nJ~. [aa >, rsv,L~ ua[+exa, lnhn R Shone I GOE,. {-.EGTOR S e F? >:'T !Ra 5dl a'pnsawlea eawsr TFxrF ran q. ~, cvvurr wrnx[a TxcM[P i kEx a, rAly,tE11 L..CGAL S E Rc~ T ~f'J4 e ~irr ClP'OI Frr.yp°; :Nrcn A Wtt_SON Et Ei_EMl;NTARY SCEiQQI., San t3ernardina, California - 03429: 28 ~?~~'~ ee5-YN -_ __.......~....,. µ..mm~ .~..,..--- ,Apnq.. S~ EXH 1817 3-G , ~ ~ ~' ,ti , ,, -. . . a ,.. ,:: . . ..:., .~LL ,;,~ r H~ $.,~ a .~v ,~:a~.~~„~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~s ~,~~~'.~ - , ~T , , ,: r; .~, ~- i ~ ~ . ~ u .,. ~ '_ F f , F.m immoou. (ht~ . -. .~, 1. y. Freeway Mate highway Major Artexza~ "~"~°'"'"..'~'..,"` ~~CoIIC~ary Arterial Collector SOURCE: CITY OF SAN BERNAROINO Local UVELSDIa II ELEMEI~ITARY SE1-IOOL, San Bernardino, California - b3A29:37 q caaasnaa, s ~`IV EXHIBIT 3-H . ~ 2Q° - I~~,~a~ oi~vloEO NI~N~r~~s ~ M~~~ ~-~ .m g-Q ~ --------- , -i4' 36'-4.q' ~,. .~6'-4fl' 1.0'-1G~' ~~.~i ~J C~ ~ F-I ~ G H ~f~l l~ l' ,~ _.....__h~~.'...... _------ ~__'_---- _ , ., ~, f { i { ~' L.__ ,.,_,,,.. ___._.,._....._..._...._. t~, ~'~~„i 9;~~ ~!1~' i .__..,_.~,.~_.~,.i o r~;~.: I ~ WELS~N 11 ELEMENTARY 5CHf30L, San 8ernardinn, California - ~3~129: 30 ~-~ EVo other committed sources of funding far improvements necessary to serve the increase in traffic are in place. The analyses contained in this report, therefore, assumed that aff improvements required are €~nfunded. 3-12 4.U FUTURE C~Alt_.Y TRAFFIC CONDlTlt7N5 This chapter of the report describes the development of the future year traffc volume forecasts and presents the resulting daily traffic volumes which will be used for traffic operations analysis. Future traffic conditions without the project are presented first, followed by the future with praject.traffic volumes. Traffic signal warrant analysis far future conditions has also been presented in this chapter. 4.1 Future With and Wlthaut Project Traffic Conditions Per City's direction, the EVTM model has been used as the starting paint for estimating the Long Range General Plan traffic volumes. The process has been described in Chapter 1.3.1. The initial review of the model data indicates that lava[ streets such as G Street and F Street show very litfile growth from the existing volumes. There is insufficient growth to represent an increase from existing plus project conditions to Long Range conditions. Therefore, it is assumed that the model represents Long Range Without Project conditions and the project only volumes are added to the model data to represent the With Project conditions. The refined EVTM made! data also show a large variation of growth. For instance, a large variation between AM and PM growth is expected an 2$th Street which is attributable to traffic using the H Street interchange with SR-30 to travel to and from the downtown area using 28th Street. In order to better reflect the anticipated local growth. Urban Crossroads, lnc. has reviewed the traffic growth for the two traffic analysis panes within the study area. 16% of growth has been calculated (See Appendix "N"}. The final rnadel growth has therefore been adjusted upward where necessary to reflect the minimum 16% growth. The Interim Year 2010 without project traffc volumes are estimated by interpolating the 2007 existing traffic volumes and the 2030 longrange traffic volumes. The City of San Bernardino has been contacted in order to determine if there are any 4-1 projects planned within the study area that would have an impact on future traffic volumes at the study intersections. No cumulative projects in the study area have been identif€ed. Project traffic volumes were then added to the refined future year EVTM traffic model volumes and the interpolated 2010 volumes to represent the 2030 and 2010 With Project traffic volumes respectively, l=law conservation checks and forecast adjustments were performed as necessary to ensure that all future Interim Year 2010 and 203D traffic volume forecasts are reasonable: The future AST and intersection turning movement volume refinement worksheets are included in Appendix "H". 201D Without Project ADT volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-A while 2010 With Project ADT volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-B. 2030 Without Praject ADT volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-C while 2030 With Project ADT volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-D. Signal warrants have been conducted for unsignalized intersections under future conditions. Ivor 2010 Without Praject traffic conditions, the following study area intersection is projected to warrant a traffic signal: (Appendix "G" includes the warrant analysis worksheets) E Street DNS) at: ® 28th Street (EW } For 2010 With Project traffic conditions and long Range General Plan conditions, no additional study area intersections are projected to warrant a traffic signal (besides those intersections that warrant a traffic signal under 2010 Without Project conditions. (see Appendix "G"} 4-2 ~XH I B IT ~-A _ ~ ~ _.~.- -~~ . esmm.ea~~em+meremv+,. ~aeeamxea>m~ ' fps mxaean~ec~sn•vnmereun er ee remaerm~ ~ . ~,~uc sR~y ~.~....-_..~__ „ oj0~ p~ +F & ~y~~ ." e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 28TH 57. ~ fi.8 9.9 2.1 fi.9 ~ ~ ~d cn ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ CV ~ ~ ~ 27TH ST. M COURTLAND DR. ~ ~ f1, 7 ~ 26TH 5T. `'~ ~ Q.2 ^ 0.3 26TH ST. c; ~ " 25TH ST. ~ i~ i ° ~ ~ 3~ 0.9 ~ ,~~~.~ i 25TH ST. - ~ t- 4 F... _ .- I Q t::.. , i ~ 24TH ST, r~•:~~~~________ ~ aC ~ ¢ a.6 u "' i ~ 23RD ST. ~ ~ fi.7 ~ ra ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ HIGHLAND AV. 26.9 26.5 24.2 23.8 23.Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ t~EG~~®m 90.0 -l/ENICLES PER bAY (~aoo's) WILSON IE ELEMENTARY SCH4C71., San Bernardino California - 63429; 23 lIIFLIi~~P~ 4-3 EXHIBIT 4~B -~-'^`~n 9 i e6~ k 1 9 tQ R 4 tt'P4 Ib~i n Y e0~t i s RY6'a' A p Gems I Y'miY.S C R ecm~AC~or~s.ir.~'e e. eisu YAl f P Y 5G~ . ~Y I~yF pg~ tl ae p4~ w ?a~ @Ftly Q ~, ti ~ ~ ~ 28TH ST. 9.8 2.0 2.? 1.9 ~,~~ "' "' N Ei ~ o ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 27TH ST. ~ w ri GOf1RTLAIVD DR. p N 0.7 ~ ~ 26TIa 5T. `'~ ~ d.2 ~ p,s 26TH 5T. c+ ~ ri 0: d' i:: :':.:,.::,~..:, . ' er 25TH 5T. ~ ~0<2 :.'`.~:,::::`~~~:.:':, o r ' 1. d ~ ~, ~`~~',~' t 25TH ST. ~ ul j ~ M c:; 0 24TH ST. i___- 3 _ i~ f ~ ¢ OS d2 ~ r { s 47 ~ 23RD ST. ~ ~.7 ~ ~, ~ ~ M H€GHLAND AV. Zfi. T 26.6' 24.3 23.9 23.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l..~G~~C~B: X0.0 - VI_HICLES P1=R LAY (11?DO'S} WILSON it ~LENIENTAf2Y 5CHOOL, San Bernardino, Eafifarnia - 43429: 24 4-4 EXHIBIT 4~C 7 -J--------~---- ~----.--_ y~ yEY4fn1LL6l SF TRH Rkk~tik klRmll9 ppq q~~Ya xwd R 4+~pY ~' ~, ~, ~ ~ ~ 28TE~ ST. ~ 4.0 3.8 q;7 4.6 ~ ~ _, ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ 27TH ST. ~ cj vOt3i~TLAND qR. ,~. 0.8 26TH ST. ~' ~ 0.3 'b D.3 26TH ST. ca ~ ice ~ ~ r..:;_.:~.~:.:~~.T~.:::. -:+ 25TH 57. 24TH ST. c_:___•_.~:W,~.~:~:v:~w~! ~ ~ ©.6 ~ Q c~ ~ ~ 28Rq ST. ~ ° ~ R ~ ti HICHLAiJq AV. g ~ 28.5 32.2 28.6 29.2 26.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ LEGEN®4 90.a = VEHiCLE5 PER DAY (90Dd'$} WILSON IE ELEIl/fENTARY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, Calii:ornia - D3429: 25 ___...~~_-____ _,... .__~.-~_ 4S~ap~~~ 4~5 EXHIBIT 4-D L ------~ ---~... _~- s ~RZe . r rs~ a . m~ x r m.ro , r a:m v x ate. -.?Y ~erarmrr aas s•W,.urr arcmavammrrae~a nr nmea pt Cltis rB _ Q ' ~ 0 r p6a IfL Y7 aa~ B g ~,a`~. ~s y: ~ t„? e" P ~' 2$TF~ ST. ~ `g~ ~t.1 3.8 4.8 4.6 ~ ~ ~ S C2 N ~ ~ ti 27TH ST. ~ ~ Cf3URTLAN[7I7R. ~ ° ~ 0,$ '" ri 26TH ST. ~ 0.3 ~ 0,5 26T€-i 5T. cS ~d ~ a:•:;•::: ~r ~ 25TH ST. ~ '0::~:G ..::.::..::.:-? p - ~ ~•:;::;:a:~I~'E';:.:;,'_;;;~ 25TH ST. ut r~ ~ - n ~ 24TH ST. r._•___:_:W~.~:w~~:•~'~:~' ~ ~Y J Q ~ d 0.7 0.2 ~ ~ e.. ~ 23RD 5T. 2.0 ~ ti, cr, ~ ca ~ "^ ; H9GHLAI~C3 AV. ~ ~ 23.0 32.3 29.T 29.3 26.6 g ~ N C7 k '~ ~ n 10.0 = VEHICLE5 PER DAY (10©0'S) lNfL5ON I! ELEIUiENTARY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, California - 03429: 26 U~tlgdi.F~4 ......v._...-.Y.... ___.~..~~.._,,.s._... - f:13QGCROAi?S ~W6 5,D FUTURE TRAFFIC ®PERATIC~I~S ANALYSIS This section of the report presents the operations analysis for both interim year and long range without project conditions and for both interim year and long range with the project conditions. The operations analysis for each analysis year is presented in a separate subsection. 5.1 Future interim Year Traffic Clperations 5.1.1 2010 (interim Year) Without Project Conditions The intersection operations analysis for 2010 Without Project traffic conditions with existing geometries are summarized in Table 5-1. 2010 Without Project AM and PM peals hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibits 5-A and 5-B, respectively. The operations analysis worksheets for 2010 Without Project conditions are included in Appendix "1". As shown in Table 5-1, the following study area intersection is projected to experience unacceptable levels of service operations during the peak hours and are, therefore, deficient per the City of San i3emardino criteria: E Street (rvS) at: 28th Street {EW) The intersection operations analyses for 2010 Without Project traffic conditions with improvements are also included in Table 5-1. As shown in Table 5-1, this deficient intersection is projected to operate at acceptable. levels of service during the peak hours with improvements consisting of installing a traffic signal{traffic signal warrant analysis worksheet is included in Appendix "G"} and dedicated left turn lanes for safety purposes. The operations analysis worksheets for 20`I O Without Project with improvements conditions are included in Appendix "[". 5~1 ~XNIBIT ~-A ~-•.~.-.. ~ ~ .y,~RaaxnY.e.ra.~+xn:~eas~rRmx~vwem er~ -~-_-- ~RR~RRi~.pkr>A~IIY Rmq eRYO~ ei R.vtYeRR RR6YlIX0. ~yY4 YY R ~ar~ ~._-~. I a iv~~ ~58 Morn '4-24 a~a ~ x-41 _ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~a« 32^ ~ f ~~,~ wt ~ N1f1N ~ M 6a 28TH 5T. °a~- vrv ~ ~ 4-p yarn 0 z7-~H sT. - ~ ,~-- COl1RTLAND iJ "' ~ }~!-g * f~ zBTH 5T. i~# i ~ t::;:: ,.26TH;;S1_;:-,-,-~ _„i_.. ~ d 25TH ST. I a .~- p ~, . F ;~,~~'~:~;~: ~ 25TH 5T. j ~ ~ z ~ ; ~ Z , i 4--; '~ ~ ~ C) ~ 2~lTH ST. c.~~~ ~ . ~ ]111 ~ ~ a` 23RD ST. ~~``---~-~. f } ~-•o -r- i H)GHLAND AV. ~-- N ~ ~ ~ / \ ~ ~ ~vo ~.--fi64 c~ n~n .-598 ~Nrs o~na'i 4_42 ~ f-46 ~ } ,.J } ~ ~ 24 } ~ { -582 ao-- '1 f ~ 'l t 33-~ ~ ` ~" s~ ") t f" 6a---} ~', } !" ' 712--'- YnnYn 87-~ nm 748"'- mYn 1-" nYn.- fi39-^- o Q~Q 57- T lSCtlM m~ n~N ~ 126-} PNC 1NEL50N if ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, Sari Bernardino, Cali€ornia - 0349: ?5 ~ARB~)iV EXHIBIT 5-B _---__ a.~., ga axx*m aPama ass~x+rwa+uame+n ea wows~ns~xaxacf a wemex naame '~aP~ptpn!xP awn PP~.LQba LnYPI ~ar~a ~yP ~_...._,..,.--...-....--_m. f~~ orrf A 5 ~ o-n ~3 24, r 1~ } ~ 146-»- 6~+ $ ~ Na r !-gym g a a gp ®M1 Bi f 28TH 5T. p + V) [r1 ~ ~ 27 F ~ ~ T ~ . f--7 cn l 9~ ~H r / / 27TH.8T. / ~ GCURTLAND Df~~ ~ I ` ~ 26TH ST. ~,J...---~ t t m.- F i- ~ 25TH ST. r_ _ "... ':. i ~ i.:"`'".""~r~~"" i 25TH ST. ..1 ~ ~ ~ vi i . 7~ r~g O ~ 6 ' 13~ ~ { R (L' ~ 24TH ST. E~ -- _- ~ ~ 4 ~ ¢ 4. ~,w ~ 23RD ST. ~'~.`-- -•-`_ ~ } f u ~ \ 'a~~~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ '\ H[GHLANp AV. ~ \ ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ~~wm ~--7Z r-r wmm z-54 ~ a I nm+n 1--1~t . .1 1. -.-1 oe1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~zs3& ~ ~ ~o ,~.-r 9z4 T f ~ ~ f ~ r ,.- i { ~-99 4 1©6-- 893~ ~ ~ ~ 26^ ~ ~ 854 cai` ^, _ 0~ ~ 7b7°-^ rnr`rym. 49-~ ~a~n r .-~ 46'-1 wsnn ~ 7---1 Nv~ 110-} `r'm,'- COUNTS CONDUCTEi] DUFZING PEAK OF THE ADJACENT STREET (4:00 P.M. ~ 6:00 P_M.) OTHER COUNT'S CONDUGTEp pURING PEAK OF THE GENERATOR (PROJECT) {2:00 P.M... 4:00 P.M.~ WILSON II EiwEME=J~[TARY SCHOOL, San Bernarctinci, CalifoFnia - 03429: 76 -~ TABLE 5.1 INTERSEC"ffOfV ANAEwYSIS EQR IfVTERIM YEAR WITFiq[JT PRO,lECT COPV[~ITIONS ' INTERSECTION APPROACi-t LAfVES' NORTH- SQUTH- EAST- WEST"- DELAY2 LEVlrL QF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND {SECS.) SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTROLS L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM f'M f-fighlanc4 Av. {EW} TS 0.5 0.5 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 19.5 91.7 B B G St. (N5) at: 28th St. (EW) CSS 0 1 0 fl 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 13.1 9.7 B A Courtland 17r. {EW} CSS 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9.8 9.5 A A 26th St. West (EW) CSS 0,5 0.5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 10.0 9A B A 26th St. East (EW} CSS 0 T 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.3 9.6 B A 25th St. (EW) C55 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 D 0 0 0 9.9 9.8 A A 24th St. {EVV) CS5 0,5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 10.7 9.5 B A 23rd St. (EW} C5S 0.5 0.5 0 0 T 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10.5 9.8 B A Highla€~d Av. (EW) T5 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 T6.9 1.1.2 B. B 26th 5t. East {EW) CSS 0.5 0.5 fl 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8.6 8.7 A A E St. {NS) at: a 28th 5t. {EW} _without imprnvelTrents CSS 0.5 1.5 0 0,5 T .5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 38,1 -._a E F -with irrtprovemen#s TS 9 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 21.9 23.4 C C 11i hfand Av. EW TS 1 2 0 1 2 Q 1 2 0 1 2 0 30.5 39.4 C C ' When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped ar unsfriped. To function as a right turn lame (here must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Lefi; T = Through; R -Might; 7> =Free Right Turn; > -Right Turn Overlap; ~ = tmpravements. z Delay and level of service calculated using the fnltowing anatysis sa€tware: Trafiix, Version 7.6.0.38 (2003). Psr the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections wiil7 traffic traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and Ieve€ of service for worst individual movement {or movements sharing a single lane) ars shown, s TS =Traffic Signal - CS5 = Crnss Street Slop AWS =All Way Stap -- =Delay High, Intersection Unsiabfe, Level of 5evice "F". U:1UcJobsl_031 DD•035D01 034001039291Exce11[03429.03.x1s]T 5-9 5~4 5.1.2 2010 (Interim Year) With Project Conditians The intersection operations analysis for 2010 With Project traffic conditions with existing geometries are summarized in Table 5-2. 2010 With Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shaven on Exhibits 5-C and 5-D, respectively. The operations analysis worksheets, for 2010 With Project conditions are included in Appendix ",~". As shown on Table 5-2, the following study area intersection is projected to experience unacceptable levels of service during peak hours and are, therefore, deficient per City of San Bernardino criteria: E Street (NS} at: ® 28th Street (EW} The intersection operations analyses for 2010 With Project traffic conditions with improvements are also included in Table 5-2. As shown on Table 5-2, ail study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service during the peak hours with the same improvements described previously. The operations analysis worksheets for 2010 With Project with improvements conditions are included in Appendix ",i" Comparing to 2010- Without Project conditions, na additional intersections operate at deficient levels of service, and no additional improvements are needed (except constructing the proposed school driveways} in order to achieve acceptable levels of service for the 2010 With Project conditions. 5.2 Future Horizon Year 2030 Traffic O erations 5.2.1 Horizon Year (2030) Without Project Conditians The intersection operations analysis for 2030 Without Project traffic conditions with existing geometries are summarized in Tabfe ~-3. 2030 Without Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement 5-5 SABLE 5_2 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS i=GR IN'TERlM YEAR VIII'FH P~tOJEGT GONpITIONS INTERSECTION RPPROACH LANES' NORTH- 5OtJTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY2 LEVfL qF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BQUNp [5ECS,) SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTROLS L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM H St. (NS) at: • Highland Av. (EW) TS 0.5 0.5 1 D 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 D 19.4 11.7 B B G St. (NS} at: • 28th St. (!=W) C5S 0 1 D 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 14.9 1OA B A • Courtiand Dr. (EW) CSS 0 1 D D.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.6 9.9 B A ° 26th St. West (EW) CSS 0,6 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 D D 0 0 1 D.5 9.2 B A • 26th St. East (EW) CSS D 1 ~0 D.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11.7 10.5 B B ° 25t1i St. (i=W ) without improverrlents CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 D 0 10.3.. 9.8 B A with improvements CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 15.4 11,0 C B 24th St. (EW) CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 D 0 1 0 0 0 0 14.5 11.1 B B • 23rd St. (EW) CS5 0.5' 0.5 D 0 1 0 0 1 D D 0 0 11.5 10.4 B B • High#and Av. (EW) TS D 1 0 D 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 18.3 11.3 B B F St. (NS) at: 26th St. East (Eve} CSS 0.5 D.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 D 0 0 9.1 9.2 A A E St. (NS) at: • 28th St. (EW} -without improvements CSS 0.5 1.5 D 0.5 1.5 D 0 1 0 0 1 0 --a F F -with irrtpravements ~'S 1 1 D ~ 1 0 1 1 0 3 1 D 22.7 23.7 C C • Hi hiand Av: EW TS 1 2 0 1 2 D 1 2 0 1 2 0 3D.9 31.4 C C ' When a right rum is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right rum lane there must be sufficient width for right Turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R =Right; ya =Free Right Tum; ~ =Right Turn Ove€lap; 1 W Improvements. ~ Delay and level of service calculated using the fallowing analysis software: Tray, Version 7.6.0.38 [2003). Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shaven for intersections with traffic traftic signal or all way step control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the decay and level of service far worst individual movement [pr movements sharing a single lane) are shown, s TS =Traffic 5sgnal CSS -Cross Street Stop AWS =All Way Stop ` -- = pelay High, Intersection Unslaf7la, Level of Service "F". irui~.t~h~t n:~~nn_na~nnt n~~nntin~e~a~~r~oitirn~d~o_n~z,.s~~rs_~ EXHIBIT 5-C ersmm~t arm+apaea+~s xp ~uaca~xa r®epcm xs ~a~ en robs unl'.ANpp per. ~4~~'~~p~srs~+p. wexex~+ _.~,----- Y- +a~ Y a ~1 ornm X24 _ _ 6,~' ~ ~ ~.- €-SS r ~ X36 35~ ~ t ~ ~ Zq-,~ mfLOr+m 23~ ,-rv g ~ 28TH ST. ,qM ~, m_ 9 ~ Cn mtv X20 I-- t j ~ ~ g b = ~ ~~.X 17 ~ 6 E f~ ~ 7~~~ N 27Ti-f ST. ~ ~ k GOURTLAf~D DR.- X22 ~ 2s-rH 8T. } r ~" I ~- . 25TH ST. {.:..' ~ ca ~ f'~. ~ ~.', I N V' r ~r~~ ~ 25TF{ ST. ~i ~ ~ ~ V.. r.:. I 3 $~ ~ rr.•~.~ ~ N q ~ B ~ ~ ~ U $' ' ~ '~..~ cFN ~6~ IE 23RD 5T. \ -~-. ---_.. r f-'°43 " ~ z '~ } 70-~ HIGHLAND AV. ~, ~I 1 ~`t° 1"m69S ~S9$ rvu'va`~' 1 577 ~~----4~~ .,,~ '~ I" 'tu `'i } 62--! "l.._.....1.("-~-~ ~ S~_ I"1 t f" 6q"'~ ~ ~ f` 757-q ~mu"Er 67~ aniN 7~5....~ ~~rv 25-~ n`~°~ 135 i WtL50N ll ELEMENTARY SCH0f1L, San Bernardino, Ca!'rfornia - 03429: 17~ cao,^R.saonos 5~7 ~XNIBIT 5-D __._.-.----- `4`-----------.-.__ -~ --~._ as w+~~pw~sa r~oh czar ~yxye~ra~ p~~a ovc t-S ~°n° ~3 ~ ~ ~ c 24-'- uran 15U--^ mioc 15--~ ,-mui 1S-~ rom ~, ~ ~ 28TH ST. ~' ~M ~ t ~ i1--y ~o 4Tm ~tp 27TH ST. ~..~.....^r ~ GOl1RTLAND D mN ~ ~ 26TH sT. _.--~~~ " ~ .,.,..-~' V~FN ''~ 2STH ST. i~.:. 1 ~ n i ,~~~.~' - " i 25TH ST. ~ ~ ~ r s ~ ~ ~ ~ O 24TH ST. i-_~---____ + ~ N'" ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~ 23RD ST. ` _1 ~ ~--- 1D---y ~ / ~ ~ ~ HIGHLAND AV. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x---72 mr'_n rmm ~--56 omv nm~+ ~-101 °wnrn ~-1095 am'o +-1138 rr w,--n 92S 71--~ '1 # f" `i t a3---~ "1 t f ~--} "1 # ~'~ 1oe---f~"1 t f 895^- r~+as. 26-°} ma 854- ~onw 5-~ or-,v 7&8--•- ocr~n 49-q ~mn ~ry 4S"'# mien 7-~ ram 7?3~ wm~ COUNTS CONDUCTED DURfNG PEAK OF THE ADJACENT STREET (4:00 P.M. ~- 6;00 P. M.) OTHE#Z COUNTS CQNDUCTED C3lJRiNG PEAK OF THE GENERATOR (PROJECT) 42:00 P.M. ~ 4:00 P.M.) WiI.SON it ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, California - 03429: 18 l1~tSA94! TAE3LE 5-3 ENTERSECTlON ANALYSIS E©R 2030 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY2 LEVEL OF TRAFFIC 80UND BOUND BOUN? 80UND (BEGS.) SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTROLS L T R L T R L T R L T R A1~+t PM AM PM H St. (NS} at: • Highland Av. (EW} TS 0.5 0.5 1 0 1 0 1 2 4 1 2 0 1~.3 9.1 B A G St. {NS} at: • 28th S#. (EW) CSS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 12.A~ 9.8 B A • Courtland Dr. (EW} CSS 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 0 D 0 0 0 1 0 9.8 9.6 A A 26th St. West (EW} CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10A 9.1 A A • 26th St. East {EW) CSS 0 1 0 0.5 t3.5 0" 0 0 0 0 1 0 90.2 9.8 B A • 25th St. (EW } CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9,8 9.8 A A • 2A~th 5t. (EW) CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Q 0 0 40.3 9.5 B A 23rd St. (EVt!) CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 D 10.5 9.5 B A • Highland Av. (EW) TS 0 9 0- 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 11.3 6.8 B A st. (NS} at: • 26th St. Eest (EW) CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 8.5 8.6 A A E St. (NS} at: 28th Sf. (EW) -without improvements CSS 0.5 1.5 0 0.5 1.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 fl - 4 -~ F F -with improvements TS 1 9 0 7 ~ 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 23.6 35.8 C D • Hi bland Av. EW TS 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 32.5 82.6 C C ' When a right tum is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn tape there must be sufficient width for right turning vehictes to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R =Right; » =Free Right Turn; > = Righl Turn Overlap; 1 =Improvements. z Delay and level of service calculated using the fallowing analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.6.0.38 (20f33). Per the 20fl0 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and IaveS of service are shown for intersections with tragic traffic signs! or all way step control, Far intersections with cross street stop control, the de#ay and level of service for worst individual movement (nr movements sharing a single lane) are shown. s TS =Traffic Signal C5S = Ornss Street Stap AWS =All Way Stop ° -- =belay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service "F". U:1UcJobsl_03900-035001_034001034291Exceil[03429.03.xis]T 5-3 volumes are shown on Exhibits 5-E and 5-1=, respectively. The operations analysis worksheets for 2030 Without Project conditians are included in Appendix "K". As shown in Table 5-3, the following study area intersection is projected to experience unacceptable levels of service during the peak hours and are, therefore, deficient per Gity of San Bernardino criteria: E Street (NS) at: -28th Street {EW) All study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service during the peak hours with improvements consESting of installing a traffic signal and dedicated left turn lanes. The operations analysis worksheets for 2030 Without Project with improvements conditions are included in Appendix "K". x.2.2 Horizon Year {2030) With Project Conditions The intersection operations analysis for 2030 With Project traffic conditions with existing geometries are summarized in Table 5-4. 2030 With Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibits 5-G and 5-H, respectively. The operations analysis worksheets for 2030 With Project conditians are included in Appendix "'L". As shown an Table 5~-4, the fallowing study. area intersections are projected to experience unacceptable levels of service during the peak hours {without improvements} and are, therefore, deficient per City of San Bernardino criteria: E Street {NS} at: 28th Street {EW} 5-10 EXHIBIT a-E .--~ --._ AtRlPtltlF~Q• '~i1f ~FS~Y%6C4RAt E>QSiQYIeR!!~S S ,~txpyitlsYy,¢i;ltt~fG'+~+A Yf YiCOARS'&M1O1 y Y ~ _...-.-..._._- r uen 1.....2 ~ X69 y NmN LDOV ~'~ 17-~-°r N~nN ~g~ Nw.- . y~ y ~i 28Ti~ ST, ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~15 ~ to ~ u uJ 7_b -~ j ~ ~ 5-~ ~ ~ry~ ~ 27TH ST. \__~-~ ~ a COURTL,hNp p~ m~ ~z ~ ..o ~ {-10 26TH ST. .-- Fem...- f ~ ---" ° ~ ~ 2:~Z~f'E-J: STS ~ ~ ; ---- 25TH ST. r_ ~ ~ = o r. " ~ .~~.7'~ i 25TH 5T. ..J ~ ~ s \' ~ z .,~ 7-~ ,no i... ~ ~ ~ 24TH ST, i~-.~ ~-:~:_~ - ~ -- ,,~ \ - Q U ~ ~ ~,- 23F2p 5T. ` ~,~ ~ ~--o ~ z " ~14 ~ HIGHLANp AV. ~ ~ ~ \'` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ mnY j 9[13 v^Ai~ m`rm 749 \ ~rva nvhi~ i 53 ~ ~- {..'.55 ~ ~ r ~ f-.-2g } r ~.- r'-696 aa--x"14(' 9 '"1S nz~`ltf ~ 6-~i}(' 1 7s~~1t~" 855-~ InttN 80-~ nom 937-~ mr.f /!! 1-` rnwc^- 74].~-~` mom 68 i moan 67-~-~ m~imJ 3p-~ a> 158'°-~ a~u~ / WELSQIV I[ I:LEi!ll~t~TARY 5CHbOL, San Bernardino, California - 03429: 19 ~3R&Yd~~! ..--._...._.-.Y._ _.......-»... caossna..os 5-11 EXHEBIT 5-F -. !R{Sfif f@~SSaN~sOry Rf t~.f YT6 *T Rlta>m AlLSL!ltlimAl~ i!!"d=A l.tl~f0 T;ski MR9 i1Si dk Cesiitll F~ .tip/ Ann 1 7 m° 4„ 5 ia'~i ~ f,. x-15 i f-12 mu1 ~ ~ ~ q ~' 0 ~ 28TH ST. ° ~4 ~ ~ ~ c~n °~"~" x--32 I~ ~ ~% s j f` 11 -3 Any m 27TH 5 t". `-`----y ~ ~URTLAND L3 ~ c,A~ ~ 1-1a } f.. x-10 26TH ST. } ~' ~ ~ ~ 25TH ST. ~ ` : r.. ( ~ ~ p ~ ' ~.~~~' :::i 25TH ST. ~ °' ~ s¢li h-V i ~ z , ~-----! ~ o 24TH ST, r~Y -a ~ r ~ ¢ & ~ ~ '~ ~ °0 0 23RD ST. } f--o ~ 1 ~' 9=~1=; ~ --- ~ s-- ~ f \'~_..~..~ HfGHLAND AV. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ - - ~.-,-87 mm rAno x-68 0_ ~uao ~--122 ~ 1-5309 ~ ~ .i ~ (A. ,F-35 $ { ~ ~ { ~ f--1199 a6 ' '~ t f' 6 -~ "~ A s1~ -`i 3 (" ~-} ~ ~ {" 151-~' , f` 1059 T mra°s 31-~'}-AOO 1057-!' oA~'naai y-• N~° 95p0._` ~ _ COUNTS CONDUCTED DURING PEAK OF THE ADJACENT STREET (4:00 P.M. - 6:00 P.M.} OTHER COUNTS CONDUCTED DURING PEAK OE' THE GENERATOR (PROJECT} (2:00 P.M. - 4:00 F'.M.) WILSON El ELEMEiVTARY SCHOOL, Sari f3arnardino, Cal"rfornia - 0429: ZO ~R~A,1~I tJ-`~ ~ ExH~gir ~-~ --__-___-_-_-_._ --- m _ ...~~•--°^~^ x¢xmr¢aam~a,mmaanucsnae,.axiaasareaa~aa ~maama~. µ n*~A, ~ae¢~,x Waw ay manfc~aa »aa as sxm as Y rvmrv ~-73 m°wfn F--.59\ c`~* ,.~ ~ ~ f-73 -.~ ~ I..~ F--244 9 ~ rv i ~ 28TH ST. ~ N~^4 ~ ~'- w.. NN L..24 F- t- very ; w v~ cn ; ~ E-zo cn ~ ~' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~" ~- w 7~ ~3 t ~ a ~ ~~' 27TH S7. _,., ~`--~'' j CC.~UFt7LANCf D ~ m l....22 26TH ST. ~ ` I` ~ mm ~ ~~.~Er ~ 25TH ST. ~ 1~ ' ~ ` ~ ~.~~~':~::, ~ 25TH ST. i } ~ - _ ., ~ r ~ ; ; zQ ~ ~ ~ /J - C7 a ---- I 24~; no // I ~ 24TH ST. i__: + "' ~„~r ~ 23813 ST. I ~ ,-o° \ H~ W +i HIGHLANC~ AV. ~ f ' ~ ~ ~ ~, maoo m mm~ sv 1~ao - m>,r~ 1-43 ~,- ar- ~-~213 rvrn.- r. ~.ui ~54 .J ~ ~ F-7bA .J ~ € {""29g _ .1 ~r ~- .r ~ ~- ;-691 4a--? "~ + 1~ 1z~~~ ~ ~1--' "1' E' a "i fi 76-; "1 f I" 8701-~ uai*w 80~-~ ioio 937- wrn~ - 1Q--•- corner 74fi°~ omm SS i caom ~ ,-N S7-y wmm 3Q~ mcn iSSti ~ miA rrr UUiLSON I! 1:LBi+/IENTAfiY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, California - 03429: 21 5-13 ~xH~BT ~_H W_•.,-~-.--~ ,s rgn es ww w~ au~r sxmn~v ermnoe~m ar ~~~swcin ~ o ® ~t 5 M aF ryiq~ ~7 NM~!}1 C] '~? 4~ ,,,) ~ f--z5 ,.~ ~ f-12 11 ~---# i - ~ 16~~~~ 4z0 ~f( -~, ~m~o -~-~ N~m °'~' ~ 28TH ST. f r ~ wr-6i N r 1 ~ 13 ~ rin m~ 27TH ST. \ COURTLAND D nm a ~ f--zs ~ 26TH ST. 3 ~ WN mm ~ 2fzTH Vii':,-;--4 ~ j 9 ~ ~ ~ ¢ 25TH ST. ~ \ ,,'~~`~'~ : i 25TH 5T. ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 24TH ST. i~ ~ -.~_.:-.- . `.-,-,,-.:i 31---~ N / ~ Q \ w ~-~.z4~ ~ 23RD ST. ~ f-ac~ ` ~ -.._ ~ 9~ ~ t., mm~ il-7 ~n~o @ ~ ~ 'B HIGHLAND AV. - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / - vmr~d 'E-67 inn ~ rvnoui x-70 o~°n~ w~.- 'E--1Z2 rm.- .,.7373 3n err 1378 N coNm -...1?10 i x--57 ~ ~ ~ i 35 ~,) ~ ~- -.~ ~ ^-139 r ss--4 '1 t f $..~ -~ . sa " "1 f f" 5-j `i ! f psi-; ~ ` 1073-"' u,inev 31-~ min i028-~ mmet 5--t maN 921-^- ;.,.-a 59-7 m~tr' ~N 57-} ©wm g--; Neom 953-' ~"~~ ,~- COUNTS CC3NDUCTE=D DURING PEAK flF THE ADJACENT STREET OTHER COUNTS CONDUCTED DURING PEAK OF THE GENERATOR (PROJECT} VIIIL5f3N ii ELEIVIENTARY SCHOC7L, San &ernardin©, California ~ ©3429: 2Z l9fEtBAl+& 5-1 ~ FABLE 5-4 fNTERSECTI©N ANALYSIS FOR 203Q W[TH PROJECT CONI7ETIO[~S INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES' NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST-- DELAY2 LEVEL OF TRAFFIC t30UND SOUNiJ BOUND BOUND (5EC5.) SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTRL}L3 L 7. R L T R L T R L 7 R RM PM AM PM H St. (NS) at: ° Highland Av. (EW) TS 0.5 0.5 1 0 1 D 1 2 0 1 2 0 14.2 9.1 B A G St. (NS) at: 28#h St. (EW) CSS 0 1 D 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 13.4 10.1 B B • Courtiand Dr. (EW) CSS 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 D 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.4 9.9 f3 A • 26th St. West (EW) GSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 q 1 0 0 0 0 10.3 92 B A 26th St. East (EW} CSS 0 1 D D.5 0.5 0 0 D 0 0 1 D 10.9 10.4 B B • 25th St. (EW) CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 D 0 1 0 0 1 0 14.2 11.0 B B without improvements CSS 0.5 D.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10.2 9.7 S A with improvements CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 14.2 11.0 B B • 24th St. (EW) CS5 D.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 D 12.2 10.9 B B • 23rd 5t. (EW) GSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11.3 10.0 B B • Highland Av. (EW) TS D 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 12.5 7.0 B A F St. {NS) at: • 26th St. East (EW} CSS 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8.8 8.9 A A E St. (NS) at: ° 28th St. (EW ) _without improvements CSS 0.5 1.5 0 0.5 1.6 0 0 1 D D 1 0 _ a - a F t" -with improvements TS 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 24.6 36.1 C C3 • Hi bland Av. EW ~'S 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 33.0 32.6 C G ' When a right tam is designated, the Sane can either be striped or unstriped. Ta tunction as a right turn Lane there must be sufficient width far right taming vehicles to travai outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R =Right; » =Free Right 7um; y =Right "rum Overlap; 1 =Improvements. z tJelay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Traffix, Version 7.6.4.38 (2003}, Per the 2044 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shnwn fnr intersections with Traffic traffic signal nr all way stop control. Fnr intersections wish cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for worst individual movement (or movements sharing a sSngle lane} are shown. a 7S « Traffic Signal CS5 =Cross street Siop AW5 =All Way Siop -- =Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service "F", U:IUcJobsl 031130.035041_03404l03429tExcell[03429.03.x1s]T 5-4 rJ~-~ rJ The intersection operations analyses f©r 2030 With Project traffic conditions with improvements are summarised in Table 6-4. The operations analysis worksheets for 2030 With Project with improvements conditions are included in Appendix "~." Comparing ,to 2030 Without Project conditi©ns, no additional intersections operate at deficient levels of service, and no additional improvements are needed (except constnacting the proposed school driveways} in order to achieve acceptable levels of service for the 2030 With Project conditions. ~-16 6.0 PROJECT i=AfR SHARE CALCtJI_ATiUN Project fair share contributions have beers calculated for 2080 General Plan With Project improvement measures. The project flair share analysis has been based on the proportion of project peak hour traffic contributed to each improvement location relative to the fatal new peak hour 2030 traffic volume. Table 6-1 presents a summary of the project contribution calculations under 2030 General Plan With Project conditions. The intersection fair share traffic contribution calculations are based on the AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. As shown in Table 6-1, the project traffic contributions range from 1.07 percent to 5.45 percent for the improvement of E Street at 28th Street. 5-1 TABl.iw 8-1 PROJECT FA1R SHARE FOR I1~JIPROIlEIVIENTS POST 2025 GP PROJECT P>^AIrC EXISTING w1 PROJECT PROJECT TOTAi~ NEW OF NEW [NTERSECTiON HOUR TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC • 28fh 5t, (FW) A11r1 836 1,49$ 38 66© 5.45% PNl $39 '£,6$Q 9 $41 1.07% U:IUcJobsl_03100-035001 fl34001034291Exceil(03429-D3.xEs]T 8-9 -~ 7.0 SUt1~NiARY AND RECC}lVIMiENDATiONS This chapter summarizes the findings of this traffic impact analysis, and provides a series of recommendations related to project implementation. 7.~ Summary The traffic issues related to the proposed elementary school development have been evaluated in the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the San Bernardino County. Congestion Management Program {CMP}. A series of scoping discussions were conducted with the Gity of San Bernardino to define the desired analysis locations. The analysis methodologies and parameters Utilized in the study conform to the published San Bernardino Count Cc~n~estian Manat~ernen,fi, Program (CMP) and City of San Bernardino Traffic impact Study Guidelines_ However, an actual CMP study is not required, as the project is a school development without- specific funding sources from the County. The Horizon Year {2034} traffic volumes without the project have been deriv~:d from the local travel demand model currently being used for long range planning in the City of San Bernardino. This model is commonly referred to as the East Valley Traffic Model (EVTM). The EVTM has received the necessary "finding of consistency" (with the CTP traffic model} from SANBAG/SCAG. Project traffic volumes for all future conditions projections were estimated using the manual approach described in the CMP guidelines. The trip generation calculation is based on the most recent Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation. Rates. 7th Edition. The project trip distributions fear Interim Year conditions are based on a review of existing traffic volumes and the projected 2030 future traffic patterns are predicted by the EVTM traffic made!. Project traffic volumes were then added to the refined future year E1/TM traffic model volumes in order to obtain the 2034 1111ith Project traffic volumes. The result 7-'l of this traffic forecasting procedure is a series of traffic volumes suitable for traffic operations analysis. 7.1.1 The Project The V1lilson 11 Elementary School project is proposed to comprise of approximately 54,6150 square feet of gross floor area with approximate 772 students nn a single-track basis and up to 900 students on a year-round basis. Exhibit '!-B illustrates the project site plan. The traffic related to the project has been calculated in accordance with the following accepted procedural steps: ® Trip Generation Trip Distribufion ® Traffic Assignment Table 2-2 (previously presented) summarizes the projected trip generation for the proposed development based on student enrollment. As indicated in Table 2-2, the proposed development is anticipated to generate a net total of approximately 621 trip-ends per day with 298 vehicles per hour (VPH) during the AM peak hour, 220 vehicles per hour (VPH) during the PM peak hour of the generator and 68 VPH during the PM peak hour of the adjacent street. Table 2-4 summarizes the trip generation for the proposed development based on the gross floor area trip rates. As shown on Table 4, the proposed develapment is anticipated to generate a net total of approximately 417 trip- ends per day, with 230 vehicles per hour (VPH}.during the AM peak hour, 175 VPH during the PM peak hour of the generator and 29 VPH during the PM peak hour of the adjacent street. 7-2 7.1.2 Existing Study Area Canditians Existing conditions analysis has been completed for both AM and PM peak hours and are shown on Table 3-1. Ail study area intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service during the peak hours. 7.9.3 Future Canditians Interim Year (2010) analysis without and with project and f*ong Range General Plan (2030} analysis are included in this report. interim Year (2010} traffic operations analysis has been completed fiar the AM and PM peak hours and are shown in Tables 5~1 and 5-2. AM peak hour and PM peak hour traffic operations analysis are summarized in Tables 5-3 and 5-4 (previously presented} for 2030 conditions. A traffic signal is needed for the intersection of E Street at 28th Street in order to achieve acc~:ptable levels of service for all future canditior~s. Na additional improvement are needed for bath 2010 and 2030 With Project conditions compared to 2010 and 2030 Without project conditions. 7.2 Recommendations The recommendations in this section address an-site improvements, off-site improvements and the phasing of all necessary study area transportation improvements. 7.2.1 Un-Site Improvements an-side circulation improvements will be required in conjunction with the proposed development to ensure adequate circulation within the project itself. Exhibit 7-A illustrates the recommended improvement measures to address on-site circulation requirements of the proposed site, which include the following: 7-3 ExH~e~r ~-~ THE PROPOSEb NORTHiTRL1'-.-.~~ ~ CURRENT' PARKING ALONG 80TH 5lDES STOA SfGN NEEDS TO DRIVEWAY ALONG G STREET ~ OF THE 26TH STREET (30 FEET W1DE EE INSTALLED AT THE WILL BE OUT$OUND ONLY CURB TO CURB) SHOULD BE RESTRICTED DROP-OFF OUTBOUND AND ALIGN WITH 2STH STREET DURING SCHOOL HOURS DUE TO THE DRIVEWAY ALONG TO THE WEST. STOP SIGN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED 26TH STREET", NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED AT DROP-OFF AREA ALONG 26TH STREET. THE PROPOSED bRIVEWAY. ~ ~ 26TH STREET ro ~ ~ E ~ \ \ p F p p b \ \ \ \ \ \ ti~\ \ m m rt -~ ~ r ~ \ \ ~ \ \ ...t.. . L - R 25TH ~ > ; - - ~ r ~' ~x m STREET ~ ~ _ ~ \\\\, --I e \ \ \ _ T \,\\` U3 ~, \ \ i- - - 1 ~m O \ w\~ 25TH STREET 73 ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ `' \ . \ \\ti ~-... L? 3 \\- \ \ ~ \ \ ti\ \ . I \ \ ~ C1J \ \ ~ \ k ~ J L p ! L ~ ~ c~nvx~ `\\~S ~ ® A 29TH \ ~ b ~, STREE _ G1 ,~ ~1~~~ ~~:~~~IE ON-STREET PARKING THE PROPOSED SOUTHERLY SEGNAGE FOR ASSISTING PEDESTRIAN NEAR ALONG G STREET DRIVEWAY ALONG G STREET WILL THE SCHOOL SITE 5}iOULD BE INSTALLED SHOULD BE ALLOWED 6E IN$OUNb ONLY AND ALIGN FOR CHILDREN SAFETY PURPOSES. FOR SCHOOL USES. WITH 24T}-1 STREET TO THE WEST. 5fGHT DISTANCE AT EACH PROJECT ENTRANCE SHOULD $E REVIEWED WITH RESPEC7T0 L~t~EEV®e STANDARD CALTRANS/COUNTY/CITY SIGHT - _ DISTANCE STANDARDS AT THE TIME OF =STOP SIGN PREPARATION OF FINAL GRADINCz, LANDSCAPE AND STREET 1MPROVkMENT PLANS. WILSON II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, Caiifnrnia - €13x29: 33 ~aa53~aAO~ 7-4 9. The proposed sautt~erly driveway along G Street will be inbound only and align with 24th Street to .the west. 2, The proposed northerly driveway along G Street will be outbound only and align with 26th Street to the west. Stop sign needs to be installed at the proposed driveway. 3. Current parking along both sides a# the 26th Street {30 feet wide curb to curb) should be eliminated due to the conflict with the proposed drop-off area along 26t" Street. 4. A stop sign needs to be installed at the drop-off outbound driveway along 26th Street. 5. On-street parking along G Street should be allowed for school uses. 6. Signage for assisting pedestrians near the school site should be installed for child safety purposes. 7. Sight distance at each project entrance should be reviewed with respect to standard CaltranslCounty/City sight distance standards at the time of preparation of final grading, landscape and street improvement plans. 7.2.2 Off-Site lmpravements The necessary off-site improvement recommendations were described in previous sections of this report. The project should contribute towards the cost of necessary study area improvements on a fair share or "pro-rata" basis {see Chapter 6} by paying development impact fees andlor additional fair share contributions towards improvements not included in the adopted fee program. 7--5 . ~ 41 Corporate Park, Suite 30D Irvine CA 92606 949660.1994 moire 949.B6Q.193 i fax wwuv.ur6anxroads.co?n ~ ~3~' ~- A,Y, ~rr- ' l V "';~;P~:~~..:_~ :,.s _~x'us~=. .mss April 9, 2007 Mr. John Westermeier KLEINFE~DER, INC '1370 Valley Vista Drive, Suite 150 Diamond Bar, CA 91755 Subject. Wilson ll Elementary School Parking Analysis Dear Mr. Westermeisr: INTROl3UCTlON The frm of Urban Crossroads, inc. is pleased to present this parking analysis far the praposed Wilsan ll Elementary Schoal in City of San Bernardino. This letter report serves as a supplemental document fnr the Illlilson_ 11 Elerneritary ,School.-"raffc Impact Analysis, submitted by Urban Crossroads, inc., dated March 13, 2007. The purpose of this shady Is to collect empirical parking data at an existing elementary school of similar size within the school district and forecast future parking demand far the proposed Wilsan II Elementary Schoal. PARKING COUNTSIDEMAND In order to assess the appropriate parking demand for the praposed project, surveys were conducted at the existing Wilsan I Elementary School, located earth of East 28th Street, easfi of Wall Avenue and west of Belie Street in the City of San Bernardino. The elementary school enrolls 850 year-round students with 62 employees. The site is located about 1 mile from the praposed Wilson 1l Elementary School. Exhibit A Illustrates the location of the Wilson I Elementary School. As illustrated on Exhibit A, the main vehicular access point far the school site is along Belle Street between 2$th Street and 29th Street. Cn-site parking with 20 parking Mr. Jahn Westermeier KLEINFELDER, !NC April 9, 2007 Page 2 spaces can be accessed only via Belle Street. Bus loading activities take place slang 29th Street between Wall Avenue and Belle Street. As there are only 20 perking spaces are available an-site, the majority of the school parking activities including staff parking were observed off-site (an-street) adjacent to the schaal and along streets in the surrounding residential neighborhood. As illustrated on Exhibit A, the an-site parking and the surrounding an-street parking have been labeled as 12 discrete areas for purposes of the survey. The survey was conducted on March 28, 2007. The survey timeframes were selected based upon discussions with schaal staff fo reflect the time period during which the typical peak parking demand would occur. Table 1 summarizes the AM peak hour parking count data far the site from SIDS AM to 9:25 AM (schaal starts at 9:00 AM} with data collected at 5 minute intervals. Table 2 summarizes the PM peak hour parking count data far the site from 2:30 PM to 3:55 PM (school ends at 3:30 PM} with data again collected at 5 minute intervals. As indicated an Table 1 and Table 2, when the survey started at 8:05 AM, there were 50 cars parked an-street while 47 cars were parked an-street by end of the PM peak hour (3:55 PM}. The ~l7 vehicle parking demand is mast likely residential parking demand on-street and was therefore not included in the school parking demand calculation. As also noted an Table 1 and Table 2, buses have been converted to Passenger Car Equivalents (PCE) with a PCE factor of 2 (as buses take up twice as much space far parking demand}. The proposed Wilson ll schaal site includes a dedicated bus loading area. As indicated in Table 1, the maximum observed demand of 128 parking spaces occurred at 8:55 AM (5 minutes before schaal starts). By subtracting the 47 vehicles related to residential parking, the maximum school demand during fhe AM peak hour is 81 parking spaces. As spawn an Table 2, fhe maximum observed Total demand for the PM peak hour of 171 vehicles occurred at 3:35 PM (5 minutes after schaal ends). The maximum schaal parking demand during the PM peak hour is 124 parking spaces Mr_ Jvhn 1lVestermeier KI_EItVF~ELDER, INC April 9, 200' Page 3 (subtracting the 47 vehicles representing residential parking). The PM peak represents the maximum demands for the parking study. Based vn the 124 vehicle maxirnurn parking demand during the PM peak hour for 850 enrolled students, the parking rate per student is calculated as 0.116 sparking spaces / per student). This rats will be used to forecast the parking demand of the proposed Wilson II Elementary Schoal. PARKING C3EMAN© I~URECAST Wilson 11 Elementary School, situated in a nearby residential neighborhood within the same school district has similar characteristics asthe above surveyed school site. The parking rate based vn the surveyed elementary school has been used to calculate the peak demand for the praposed Wilson II Elementary Schoal with 900 year-round students. The maximum parking demand far Wilson II Elementary School is 131 parking spaces based 0.148 parking spaces per student. Based vn the site plan illustrated on Exhibit B, the new Wilson II Elementary Schaal provides a much higher number of vn-site parking spaces. Besides the 53 parking spaces provided on the project site, the designated drap~off area along 26th Street can accommodate 4 buses and 7 cars, which increases the total on-site parking loading capacity to 68 spaces (PCEs). Thsrefbre, only 63 aff-site (onwstrset) parking spaces are needed to accommodate the maximum total of 131 parking spaces demand. Exhibit B illustrates the passible an-street parking lacatians. The potential number of parking spaces is also illustrated. By assuming Bach parking stall needs 24 feet in length (per the Califamia Traffic Manual), there is a total of 135 spaces available within 200' ar less of the school. Therefars, an adequate supply of parking is available. "1=" Street, south of 26fih Sheet can provide 19 spaces along the school side, `"G" Street, south of 2fith Mr. John Westermeier KInEIN1=E1wDER, !NC April 9, 207 Page ~ Street can provide '18 spaces slang the school side. The remaining parking demand of 28 spaces can be accommodated slang the following possible on-street parking locations: West 25th Street ~ 24th Street ~ "G" Street, north of 28th Street • „I"" Street, earth of 28th Street School parking is eat recommended along 28th Street and the East 25th Street as Both roadway segments are only about 32 feet wide (curb to curb). In addition, parking on 26th Street may create too much traffic conflict with the proposed drop~off bay area. StiMMAiRY AND CLU5ING In conclusion, the proposed Wilson 11 Elementary School provides a fatal of 68 on~-site parking, which is more than triple the existing surveyed elementary school on~site parking. 'The peak parking demand will still require some off-site (an-street) parking that can be accommodated along the streets surrounding the project site. Urban Crossroads, Ino. is pleased to provide this analysis for your use. Please contact us if you have any further questions. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CR4SSR4ADS, INC. Carleton Waters, P.E. Min Zhou, P.E. Principal Associate CW:MZ:KT:cg JN:03429-04 ~XH{B!T A ~L~~~ ~~~~E~~~~~ a ;fix mw ~ Ai. a r ~ ~ ~ A E,, ti gp~ ~ ~ fz 8 ~,~ 6 r 1AiE ~ ~ ~ 4 v ~ ; at ~ ~~" ~ ~ gg, ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ J o' ti a~ • { ~ ~ 1 ; ~ ~ -~ ~ ~" "'"'~ awl ~'~ ~'~ ~' ,~ _ ,; ~ ~, r ~ ,_ 7 ,.,a ti, ~9 ¢ S' ', N ~y ' r `7~ 3 ~ ~N ~ ~, ~, ,~'- ~ ~e ~~t 2 s w ~- ! ?;r ice: } ~ ~ ~ ~- `mot ~ ~ ~~~~C~FA1::~. ~ t ~ ~a. S ~y~ w, i ~'~~ a ~ ~' ~ ~ Y w 7 1 ~ . , k a s a a„ 9 ~:~r.~ d '".~, ~ m`r , ' j -,tea i ~ n .c , "' ~'~ ,~ ~' . ~-7a r a x ., -'r ~~' S ? - - 'F ,:~ t ~ ~s ~ ,_ r~ .~~, z~ ~ ., x i tr..^" a ~ ~ a~ - z~ ,. v a ,~ L~VFIGNQi =PARKING, LOCATIUN IN#)EX W#LSON Il ELEMENTARY 5CF9QOL, San Bernardino, Califgrnia • fl3424:Eocmap_.-- --~_ ~~~p~ EXHIBIT B ~li~~.~®N 1~ ~L~IN~I~T~RY' SC~~~~ ~T~ PAN M 's s 26TH STREET" is ? .' ? ? ? ~ -d ~ ti ? ~ ` ,` - L -i. 1. 1_ A . ~ ~ ? ` ? ~ ` ? ~ -! _ _ ~ chi A~?`~? ~A V? ?A~?`V? V~ .~.._,,.~__._._. ~25TH tai' j L7 ,I m3 { 3 f-_{. n ~ F ~v~ ~ ~\~\?~`?,`~,~;\~~`?\~~`~ :G M ? ~ l ~ ? _ ? ? ? '°1~ ~ - W., - 3 ..{...,.. 7 .% _ ~ , ~ . ? ~ ? ry~ 25TH ~ ~ i~ ® \ ` ~ ~ i4 ~\\l p ~ i 24TH w, ~ ~ ~ '` ` ~ . ~ _ STREE"T"' ~ ®g"~ ~ , ; ~ --_ ~~W ? ?- ao~ ~ ERR®W Ii1E~P1 MfD~LE SCHDa~Y ~'._ LEGEN®: = POtENTiAL SCHOOL qf~t-$Il'E PARKINCs = POtENtIAL 5CHObL PARKIN(:" SPACES WILSON II ELEMENtARY SCHOOL, San Bernardino, California - Q3429:_U2,_-'----- ~-_---~_~.~ _ .~__------- NN t+7 r p mm Cfl O~ O M CV ihfl ~ h ~ 1N- ~tl ~ ~ '- N A L7 M AY ^ tQf1 [f) ~ fD imO ~ OND W O "' ~ G~1 W ~ Gmf! ~ dNi ~ r r~ p~ _m ~ ~ ,N,..C m ~ ro co ro cP ~ to m to tO N h h tR tp cD cp cO h N U) o~ ~ r ~t~p m ~ L~ {'4 P'i M L~7 T9 M M C~') ~1' 7A M t~'7 NS i7 iri N 7A N m 0. } .n3 Q Q N ~ ~ {{pp h kw hr N [!- h ILS tf1 ~!' ~' `~S' 'd' tl' 'Rt tf ~ Ui h• N ~ !I. ~ ta7 r ~ Of .S"i- "~ m {L7 t0 (Q CO (tl aG t0 h W pT W fG t0 tD iD m ~ o U r ap ~ tt1 Et} t(J lb ft} ~ ~f7 by ~ A!7 u`7 ~ us m tD G7 m CA ~ ~ ~ R1. M~ w^ N- w N v~- N N N .- [fit ~Q~~" tD ~ ~ Nf C ) c+J V ~1' ct 7!7 t0 00 CO T (T C7Y QI b ,~ ~ ~ ~ {!I ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~t~-' ~ ~ CV ~ cif ~ NJ ~ ~ N N N N N i+l ~A °N . 'CY ~ e-~ Ni N tV M ~t tY CO fY! tp ll'i ~ri uz fC CQ N r3 i / d CV ~ M C'1 M MJ <P' V' V V' *~t ~ri tt] !W R E~- h h i•. ~ ~ ~ N r w ~ N N V1 etf ~ O° N ~ .L'" ~ 00 SA fA pi N ip tb H1 c0 N ~ h ~ ~ h (U {~Di~ m N CU 8 ~ ~ ~, tw w G7 6) 6l OY L~ ~ CJ C M Ct' M N <- r V rW +r~ r ~ ~ ~ °s O d!1„ ~ ~ ~ p w ~ ~ w ~ ~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ r. « ~ f 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ a N ~ m m ~ ~ 0 N A~ ~ (q A N h M1 ti h i+~. f~• . W ~ M ~ n~ u5 a iN., ~ ~ ari co t9 i+l C9 M cn t9 as in N 'vf cO M N N a1 N ip ~ as ~ eepp sSt~d CNV ~t7 xY-~ m tT V' ~D N 1~ +C h tp Y•• Mw N S~ ~ N r E" m W sF ~ 0. ~ ~ ~ ~ W 1,1) tb 4G 1fi W U'1 u7 i{? !b i[1 i[S tD 07 N'7 tl' [f/' ~ Rf 7r S2rf Q ~ w ~ +D ro tp u7 u] m tb co m m M W .w, O W ro m 4' ~ u' ~ L'3 ~ m Q ~ 'tl' d' v u~ fb ~ Kt V' v tt e7 ~' <p N cn M c+t N u7 -~ ~ w ~' dl r m ~'~ '~ h• I~ 4r ~ ~ ~ ~ n ti h CJ A~ 47 ~ M M th h ,c Q ~" a a + t ~ Z L ~ a ~ ~ bb ~y pqp pp ~{~y pp pp~~ f~Q/~ f0 N ~ N N N~ N M~ M M ~ M 1'9 t~~l r ~r ~ M I ~ W~y 7 Iid M M M N (9 fit N N N r N M i'O M N M e^ M O Al ~ M~~ M M M M M M M M (q M M V' V' ct M N M M Y ~ N pp ~{y1 v, m:aw ~rr~~~~~~£3~e'rNN R3 .`s'~ N m N f3. _ ~ U `"' ~ ~ r• N N N r N v- N O N t0 ~ 4 a- M ~ t Q C y ~ _' ~ ~ ~ r" N 1 -~ ~ i.3 i1 ~ ~ N N M di cd di m co i.> f+i s+i c4 c5 di c ~ ,~ 43 Corporate Par&; Suite SOU twine, CA 926nG , 949.66p.3 994 main 949.666.393 3 lax wwtiv arbanxraads.com ~~a: ~~~" ~ ~r~ ~~,- 5~~. September 5, 200? Mr. Jahn Westermeier Kt.EINI~'ELDER, INC '13?0 Valley Vista Drive, Suite '15Q Diamond Bar, CA 9765 Subject; Wilson ll Elementary Schnnl Sfte Existing Parking Demand Evaluatfon Dear Mr. Westermeier: ~NTRODU~TION The firm of Urban Crossroads, Ir~c. is pleased to present this letter report documenting the existing parking demand in the vicinity of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School in City of San Bernardino. This letter report serves as a supplemental document far the Wilson II Elements Schaal Traffic lm act Anal is, submitted by Urban Crossroads, inc., dated March 'l3, 2047. This letter report also supplements a previously prepared letter report dated April 9, 2007 that snaly~ed the parking demand far the proposed Wilson II Elementary School project itself. The purpose of the study documented in this letter report is to collect empirical parking data in the vicinity of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School. A key nearby parking demand generator is Arrow View Middle School, located adjacent to the proposed Wilson II Elementary Schaal project site. Unlike the surrounding residential uses, the peak parking demand time frames for the adjacent Arrow Vew Middle School may overlap with the peak parking demand time frames for the proposed Wilson 11 Elementary Schaal project. This letter report therefore provides additional information related to background conditions for purposes of assessing potential project impacts. PARKING COUNTSIDEMAN© In order to evaluate existing parking demand in the vicinity of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School and particularly for the existing Arrow mew Middle School, surveys 029-06 Mr. Jahn Westermeier KLEINEEL.DEI~, INC September 5, 2007 Page 2 were conducted on the roadways surrounding Arrow View Middle Schaal. Exhibit A illustrates the location of Arrow View Middle School. Exhibit A also depicts the parking "zones" that were def ned far purposes of this study. As illustrated on Exhibit A, the main vehicular access paint for Arrow View Middle Schaal is located slang North G Street between West 23~~ Street and West 24i" Street. On-site parking at Arrow View Middle Schaal consists of 59 parking spaces. Bus loading activities take place slang 29th Street between Wali Avenue and Belle Street. There is also a day care center located at the northwest carver of North E Street and West Highland Avenue with 23 on-site parking spaces. As previously illustrated an Exhibit A, the an-site parking and the surrounding anTstreet parking have been labeled as 20 discrete areas far purposes of the survey. The survey was conducted the week of August 20t~' through August 24k". Schaal staff were contacted to confrm that school was in session and fully occupied at the time of the surveys. The survey timeframes were selected based upon discussions with school staff to reflect the time period during which the typical peak parking demand would occur. Table 1 summarizes the AM peak hour parking taunt data for the site from 7:00 AM to 8:10 AM (school starts at 8:00 AM) with data collected at 5 minute intervals. Table 2 summarizes the PM peak hour parking count data for the site from 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM (school ends at 2:15 PM) with data again collected at ~ minute intervals. As indicated an Table 1, there were 57 cars parked an-street when the survey started at 7:OD AM. Similarly, Table 2 indicates that there were 88 cars parked an-street at the end of the PM peak hour (3:00 PM}. The majority of this non-peak parking demand (approximately 50 to $0 vehicles) is most likely residential parking demand. As also noted on Table 1 and Table 2, buses have been converted to Passenger Car Equivalents (PCE} with a PCE factor of 2 (as buses take up twice as much space for parking demand}. (}3429-©5 Mr. John Westermeier KLEINFELDER, INC September 5, 2007 Page 3 As indicated in Table 1, the maximum observed demand of 112 parking spaces occurred between 8:05 AM and 8:10 AM (5 minutes after school starts). The data included on Table 2 indicates that the maximum observed total demand for the PM peak hour is 170 vehicles. This occurred at 2:15 PM (just as school ends). The PM peak represents the maximum parking demand time frame for the parking study of existing conditions in the vicinity of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School. Review of the parking demand data indicates that the following locations exhibit the highest demand during the PM peak hour when the overall parking demand is greatest: • West 24f~' Street, east of North E Street; • North E Street, between 23~~ Street and 24~' Street; • West 23'~ Street, east of North E Street; • North G Street, between Highland Avenue and West 23`d Street; • West 23`d Street, west of North G Street; and • North G Street, between West 23'~ Street and West 24'~ Street. The key issue is whether the existing parking demand in the vicinity of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School site will overlap with the anticipated demand from the proposed project. The previously published letter report documenting the demand for the proposed Wilson ll Elementary School indicated that on-street parking would be mast likely to occur along the following roadways: • North 1= Street, south of 26th Street (adjacent to the proposed site) • North G Street, south of 26th Street {adjacent to the proposed site) • West 25th Street, west of North G Street or east of North F Street • 24th Street, west of North G Street • G Street, north of 26th Street F Street, north of 26th Street 029-06 Mr. John Westermeier KLElNFELDER, INC September 5, 2007 Page 4 The previously suggested areas where on-street parking is likely to occur in conjunction with the proposed project are different from the areas where parking demand related to Arrow View Middle School is concentrated. Therefore, adequate on-street parking supply is available to serve the projected parking demand from the proposed Wilson II Elementary School SUMMARY ANIJ CLOSING Based on actual surveys of existing parking demand in the vicinity of the proposed Wilson II Elementary Schaal, adequate on-street parking is available 'in conjunction with the proposed off street parking to serve the projected parking demand. The areas where such an-street parking activities are anticipated generally do not overlap with the existing parking demand associated with the nearby Arrow View Middle School. Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide this analysis for your use. Please contact us if you have any further questions. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Carleton Waters, P.E. Principal CW:Ir JN:os~z~-as Attachments as4~s-as EXHIBIT A R~®V41 ~?IE~' ~IIII~~DLE NCH®~L L®CA?TI~N I~AP ~ ~ , ,. {, i,~ n ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ g ~ ~ ~ j ~ € a. ~ ~ sr. zsTrr srT y ~ . u o .w.,-.... .r~~,~ r O <~' Fr ~ ~ j~~ a~ ~ J 7 r~ ~ ~ e. 13 J '" ~ I~ EE7` ~ ~ a e~ s~ ,, ,~~ may.. s 'S~ n t , uvl' . y, ~'' a~ ~ SYn [ ~ ~ ~' ' ° g , ) h"„,` ~h~l + '~ „~s N%h J ~'f,'~ av;* urt~ ~ 2 an ~ x r s ~ ~ s a ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~'{7 a ~ : VY. HlQHLI1ND /iVEN06 ~ 7 '' „ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LEPE_N©_: a ~ CJN-5TREET PARKINCr A~ @ qFF-S'fREE7" PARKING WfLSClN II EE.EIY11=N7ARY 5CHOUL, San I}ernardino, California - D342S: 34 EXHIBIT B l~1RR~V~ ~IE~N'' ~VIIDI~LE ~CHa~L w~~~~~LE ~N-sr~EEr ~~~K~~~ spacE FE~r~ r~- k, t9 ! W ~ .+'~ ~ 4e1 _ ,~ 'if/. 25TH STREET , ` R s, i 4 f ~ x ~ ~ ~ ,~~ ~ ., ~ Elsa ~ ~ x ~'. ~s ~F,r "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~u A .66 w ~ E ~ ~rt~~ ~~~5 ~,.~ uhf"`=-~ i~'4~a~?° ~x -. _,- ~ - ~ F '~ _ _ f fl J~ ^w -' i ~',~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ 'gym '~ ~ ~ ~ '' ~ x ~ i ~ x~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.,x" ~ 9., ~., ~ ~ ~ ~~~4. ,~~ r~ 'T a ~'~ ~ ,r M ,S ~ 3 a ,.. T ~ ~- „ r, ~ ~ ~, '. 4s ' ~1i } W. NIGMLANO /!1/E'NfI,E ,' ,~, ~ ~r ate' , ~" ': ,..A~/ Y ~r d~ I ~ h b ~- ~ ~, '3' a ate. g ?' ~ ..,.d. __.._~c~3 ON-STREET PARKING OFF-STREET PARKING WILSON If ELEMENTARY SCFi00L5an Bernardino, California - 03429; 3S ~1RRiAA~I ~.~._....~-- --~_.__ o~>ROA_~ °o a o 0 o n r N s! ~ f~O h h~- m ONi ~ a G O ~ ~ N d (A T N d' Os K M N N N sp V M M V a' V d' 1f1 t~ kn U1 ~ iLl S[1 N ~ 0. n mN~. ~ N~ r M ~' ~' d' C V V' V ~t M m N N M V' i ~ u. • "~ c 3^ c~ ea ~ '~~ m M M m m m M .t Gn v m in m to ca m r ~ ~ ~ N w~ U~ N N M M N N M O ~ ~ ~ ~V ~ u1 ti 1~ W W W N W O> 01 O~ a0 U] ep W ys 171 F E l7 O O O O ~ M 4(1 N ~9 4!1 W W 6J 01 m m _o a N ~ m M ~ M ~ r, t\• ~ ~ N O O N N V ~A ~A W ~ ~ M uI rn W 2 + x R M N~ ~rM ~ O O A 9 r r p O o o P o O p p r ~ n f7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j aN. ~ w~ Ga c] p p d d n p C! n n o o C? d C~ F h" ~ O ~ O~ '~" ~ N N p A r N d N r r p r N z N z ~ a ~ o ~ ~ ~ tl> a G ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N oy. s m a o. 4 U W ~ Iif N ~ ~ p ro a ~ ~ a u> ~ u~ ~n ~n +n ~n in .r a v~ :n m m u> rn F" ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~' ~s U 7 n~ w m N o 0 0 o a o 0 o a o 0 0 o m V1 3 ~ ~ a ~ ~ w Q to W N v v~ N ('9 M M M M M M M M M M M M M cq ~ 2 3 G. R~ t(~ V„ ~ W ~y 7 s{ V M M M M M M M M M M M M a (G Z ~ W 0. `,( t{ W N W d O O O O O d n n b O n d O 0 O z~~a3 x M W ~ ~ d d O O tl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d ^y Z p. X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h. N~~~x M m m M M m M M M M M M M m m M ~ m .N s g ~ a ~ ~ -~ .- N ~ ~ vY M C~ IA N W in sA tD >n fD +fi ifi Sn Ih N 1b O .53 m 0^ Y '[i C Lm~F a v c g 4] ~ N 5 N N q' [,~ M M M u~ v v '*s 7 M sf? v m A ~ ~ ~p P Q ~rs ~ ~ [V [~+S N M M V~~S' '~mY tlW' ~ R N N VM> tWi'1 u C~ uS ~3 0 0 a ~ ~ ~IilW "c Q~ d E ~ o m o~ rs ~n n =n a m o ~n o© o '~ ~ a o U~ ~ F Q p N N M M Q y xn V1 d W P 3 ~ M N r r r ti h~ n o n W i9 J ~ V ~ <$~° v°ii a M a a w m ~ a~ r _ ~ o ~ vi a w ~ o r ° ~ ~ m ~ vii ~ v "~ O N ~ ~' m 1.9 ~ ~' N M N N M r Z ~O tl f7 n Ti ~ M c+J M C' M M M M M C7 M t'~ V' ~ ~`"a ~r P W~ l7 ~3~ M M M m t7 M i'9 M m ~- n3 N `p ff'S W W q f7 rv r~ N N N~~ V~ ~tl d d N M r µ ~ w DI d~ rU ~ a a a N N T n~~ N M ~- N '~ IS ~ a M V' rv~ jx O1 O N N UJ N m N z $ a LL N~ o o a o 0 0 o a o o a o a o K 4 g m v u. N W ~ 1- t~~- '+~' W}3 ~i ~ 4 O O o O o P O 0 0 0 4 O q ~ N ~8 O p V ~ Z J {X S d~ ry3 .-~ zil d N N g q r- p g tl q C? ~tl a ti 3y M ~ a o rn ~ us '~ v v> M v~ .- .- n Yr M rn ~ ° ¢ ~ g ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ c C1 ~ K~ W2 N ~ ~ ~ rN- ~ SD t0 N q c0 ~ N ~ N N N O J a^ Q !- "` o~ N W tl> © eM o 4 r s- W V' uJ M N ~ ~ ~ ~~t~ 0 .r w,~„~~ mdmmNMmdMmMmm d ~ ¢ ~ u w u~ n ,- w a m° m° ° ua so m ~ o 4311 tai z ~ ~ m a ~ M LL o a o o a o o a o 0 o g o a ~ z ~ ~ ~ n- f° ~ i. 1 ~ ~ m F s~r~ ~ N~ s. ~+T M NJ M m N to m C~ ~J M M C') V' Y ro G ~' •$ ~ lu ~ a ~ ~a~ ~ ~m ~ ~ r ~ 09 LL ~ ~ A 96 LL N N V' N IA M M m iD t0 NO C N p w ~ C ~ O p G ~ a m ,L +n w w n n <n w m cv w ca ur ~ ~ n~ ~ o v r~, ~ ? ~ gg a air a' o ~ r F F ? ~ m in m us w .°n °°n a a °v $ CO ~n ~ ~ m ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '° m } 9 M d p # ~n J !L L! C pQ pp o U~~ ~ _ 0. P Q D .~- h N M M~ C !tl N O ~ J~~ oy y ~ vw v v v d a> ~p = °- ~ W ~,..~ ~ '':; ,~ ~ ,~~ CQr a~~~~ A~~~Sui~~ 3~D~ Iruan~ CA ~~~oS ~~~~o x~9~ ~~n ~39~9 ~~C31~1 ~ fax ~ tar~a~e~s~r~~rks ~sam ,. ~ -, September ~, 2{107 Mr. John tNestermeier I~LEiNI"ELDER, IIV~ 1 X70 Valley Uinta Drive, Suite 50 I~iamand Bar, 9176,E S~rl~~ec~; Filson II ler~er~f~ry cr~~1 m s~~ce~ted fotes~f~a~cli~~ol f~larr Dear Mr. estermeier: The firm of Urban Crossroads, Inc,. is Teased to present the following Suggested f~outesW ta-Schaal Plan for tl~e proposed tlifilson II ~lert~entary Schaal. It is our understanding that '' the scha€~l mill car~sist of up to 772 students and will involve the v~ication €af ~~~~' Street. (between ~ Street and F Street} grad Berkeley .l~venue (between 25th Street artd 26k~' Street). The project is bounded by 26~' Street to the north, F Strut to the east, G Street to the west artd Arraw View Middle Schaal to the south in the City t~f Sort Beri~ardinc~. Pxhil~it A illustrates the location of the proposed school site and the potential attendance boundary i area. E { i 1 ntrod l.1CtiC}n 3 The site plan for the proposed elementary schor~l is ifil'ustrated on Cxhibit As shown on l;xhibit B, access to the project site will be provided via ~ Street and 26t~' Street student drop-cuff area}. The internal circulation clang ~ Street will be ccrrEflgured v~?ith a ane way clrculatiar~ design and will be served by two driveways. The southerly driveway will be designated ferr lnbc~und traffic will be aligned with the existing 24tH Street. The northerly outbound driveway will lie aligned directly across Pram the existi~~g 25th Street. The exclusive student drop-tiff area will be pr€~vided along 26th Street. The drop~aff circulation '', is else configured to provide ane way flow. Mr. Jahn ~testerrneier l~l_EIfVFELI~ER, ING September 4 Page 2 The protection of school age pedestriaa~ is the shared re~portsibility of par~nfs, schonl admini~stratcars, traffic af~cials, civic leaders, arrd vehicle drivers: Pedestrian safety consists of educatfan of the pedestrian, enforcement of traffic- laws,. and engineering of the rc~~d system to reduce risk. The goals of the routes-to-schaof plan ire intended to encourage physical activity, improve unsafe walking grad biking canditic~ns, and improve air quality by reducing vehicle emissions. This document identifies current paths of travel far pedestrians aammuting to the proposed lfitilsorr II (~.lertmentary Schoof within the schaal's attendance area. A field review of fhe area vrrithin the attendance boundary area has been conducted to callecfi the fc~liawing ira~farmation. 1. kc~catian of sidewalks 2. Traffic control devices at intersections Grass-walk locations ~6. Existing school signage/striping E Current ~anditians ,' The praprased project site wiil be situated within an established cc~mrnurrity with the majority cif the streets, traffic cc~ntrcal devices, grad side~ralks ira place. Furthermore, sire the project will abut the existiraq Arro~nr View Middle Schaal, some school signagefstriping has already beers implementer{ in the area. xhibif ~ illustrates the current traffic controls within the attendance area boundary. Similarly, Cxhibit G illustrates the existing signagefstriping that was implemented fear the Arrow View Middle Scheel. ~' Thc~ majority of the streets within the attendance area are two lane rnadways with the exceptions of Highland Avenue, E Street, d Street, and Arrowhead Avenue. °These roadways contain 2 lanes in each directiari, far a fatal of ~ travel lanes. Mr. Jahn Bittesterrr~eier l~LElhlF~LD[~F~, ll~G Septerrrber 4 f~age 3 5~.? ested l~a~utes-to-Schaal ~'lar~ The standard guidelines and vfrarrants tar the application of sign, markings, and signals that world ordinarily be installed on rraadways near school sins as part of an overall #raffic cr~ntrol system are covered in the Mama! an €~nifarm Traffic Mantra! Devices (fV1llTCD} ~OQ3 edition. The application afthe Schaal Advance Sign ~S1-~}and the Schaa! gassing Sign is defined in the MUTGD. Ths School Advance Sign is rewired iri ~dvarrce of the Schaaf Grassing Sign. UVhere pedestrians are prohibited fram Grassing the roadway, car where the sGhoo! grounds are separated fram the- roadway, car where the sGhoal grcaun~s are separated fram the street by a fence (ar other physical barrier), it ray net be necessary to provide. either the Schoai Advance Sign ar the Schaaf Crossing Sign. i i The use of Schaal Speed Limit Signs (S~-9, ~~,-3,-4) is generally established by State- ar lace! !aw cr rr;gulation. Driver avuarene~s and observance of these pasted speed limns thraur~h the school pane should be sought thra~g every means possible. These signs are one method of control. I i Grassing Supervision Can-site supervision of a schc~cal Grassing is appropriate where walking routes to elerr~entary ` schools crass major, high volur~ne roadways. Specifically, adult Grassing guards should bs '' considered when special problems exist which make it necessary to assist the srnali children in Grossing tfte street, such as at an unusually cari•tplieated intersection with heavy vehicular turning movements arrdlar high vehicular speeds. Various agencies have established warrants far the use of adult crossing guards. An example of such warrants as given below may be of value in developing lace! Criteria. Adult crossing guards rrray be warranted under the fc~llawing conditions at traffic signal car~tralled intersection Crossings: j '~ liar; Jahn Westerrneier K~.~li`I~~L..D~R, f~9C Septerr~ber 4 F'ag~ 4 Where the number of vehicular turning movements thrt~ugh the school crosswalk exceeds 300 per hour while children are going to or from sohooE. ttVhere there are circumstances not norrrialfy present at a signalized intersection, such as crosswalks mare than 80 feet Long with no intermediate refuge, or an abnarmafly high proportion of commercial vehicles. The Mt~TCI~ implies fihat crossing guards should be considered to "...provide gaps in ', traffic at schor~l crossings where an engineering study has shavers that adequate gaps must be created." Although the example v~rarrant is based an traffic vofurne and pedestrian vcslumes, it is assumed that "adequate gaps" would nc~t be available under these ct~nditians; hence, an adult erasing guard is desirable. exhibit Q illustrates the routes from the neighborhoods within the attendance boundary area that students could use to access the entrance tca the school. It should fae noted that ;' the routes-t~s-school map was based on all entrance to the school (vehicularlpedestrian) occurring from G Strut and 26~n Street only. Recammerrdaticsns { E `Che following reoc~rnrnendations are presented below to irrsprove the current canditions ', and help to ensure that the routes-to-school goals are met. ', 1. The use of crossing guards should be considered and evaluated once school is in 3 session at the following intersections: a. ~ Streetl~~-t~' Street b. ~ Streetlf-lighlands fivenue c. E Street/2 at" Street d. ~ Streetl25s~ Street e. Arrowhead Averruel2~~~` Street 1ylr. John 'lftlestermeier KI~EIIVF~.I~~I, [IVG September ~ Page 5 2. The implernen#ation a~ appropriate school signage and striping around the- schc~nl should be installed as shown nn xh'ibit E, and as indicated in the l~l~TGI~. 3. G.urrently, ~4~~ street between H Street and G Street does not provide sidewalks erg either side of the scree#. Since 4~'' Stree# will iae directly across trarn the schaoi`s er>trance, it is recommended that sidewalks k~e provided on this street. 4. In order to promote bicycle use, the scheic~l shs~ulel prcivide secure ar~d cnnven'ient ', Bicycle parking. Parents sht~uld review the suggested rr~utes to school plan with their child and highlight the apprr~pr'rate route talfrnm their residence. E l~r~an Crrassroads, Inc. is pleased to provide this analysis for your use. Please contact us i~ yr~u have ar~y further questions. ', l~espeatfully submitted, ~~L}F~S~~ k ~ ~ E ~.~,.-.., 7f~r ,,, tJI~S~R1 ~RC7 ~~~1~;` j, C3 ~-- .1 r~•: f~a. ~ C)~ 7 Cxp. 1 S ~ CdigtL~ ~~~.~.11 i (~(n~yy ~y{ ~~.ryy /~1yy~ y}~? y§~-.gyn. ~~C).~~1.1~'~ y,`%'y 3 Pr~rtc~pal SS:m~ JtV:0429-routes to schc~nl Attachments E t 4 i ~X~IIA ,~~_' 8 •~t' n ,~~ zsTH sT. ~ a~ g~ ~ # ~ ~ x ~ u ~ s I 2TTkf ST: GG3~RTLANL7 C3F;. 26TH ST. p 26TH $T. i,::::::•:~s ts::;~~~:::~:F;..;..:~.:;... z;~r~! fir. ~ ~ O 243'H $T, f~, w:~a ~ -.(ro s~ A~art~aodes5) j 23RD ST. "" H(Giil..AN~ AV. ! r B~ d ~..®a ,~..,,~, ~ pr~T~eaTr~,~~c~ar~~ • ~rr~r~~a~tc~ ~outa~A~v a ~ TL) 8E ABAND[)H~D 9]~ F+e~ia[mn f:t ~~T~~T~ ~'fM Rtisdaef~i.nkavllltxma i.A,f.~c. ,f p!• fY.T~i ouli i[i emaf ia• vnvef Y~sW SS ~oxe~ MXWc[ ~1111i.5t3D?# 11 ~L~tVI~NT'ARY SC6~60E.. fan Bern~rdlnc~, Calrfornra s XHIR~ ~ ~, r I ,~ ...ate ., ~ ~ . . ` ~ 1--5 ~ \\~, ~, ~v~ P 1 ~ b ~ r ~ ~ ~ , .a I f WtLSCl~f Il EL~ME~dTARY SCH~C~L, San„_B~rnarc~ina~Ca[ifo~i~ia -434.29: tl~ ~X~t B ~i ~ r....~.._._..~.w ~____~9:„s::___.._ . ~ BCkK£YEY CY._..,._...._......._ . ~'E'CtAFFiCSiGNA~. ~ ~ } = S~'f7P SEC~N UWf,E55 ..' ., ...,._. y a C}Tii1wRV4ffS~ RttJT~A ~ ~ r ~ .,...-., ~ iViAiiKirE9 CROS5I~EG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ I i = ¢ O o z ""'~'~'"'~ .......,.... W.aB7>w 57' ..,....._~. ~.-..-.-..... k s ~1~~i .:c M~.]GIYI Wi-i i} :-. n~a ~' ............~.,-.. ~ ..~...,.' w. 28iH ST..._.... .IJL , ~' X W ~ i~ ~ a S i Y w 4 z IFMC~T ~ C'-""W.AIERAHfaG[AV. a >Q ' 5v.axmsT' z - ^tM^, . a~ 4Q }Alen?$ ~ F ' .,._.v_.~_.. 3 caul<n~ uFO ° W "~ ¢ l_ ~ w x. 6TH_sr ` v! 76TliSC. ~ TI - _ a _ _ ~ eY. 25fNSf.',...,._. -~L:'._:'=.'~':.: :~.^_~..F...~,~ ~ ----._...._.,_,-,-,. [v. a<TH Sr. ~.._...,... 31 ..._._._....~' 1 ~ i i-.kO SE~ENAtJC. V EI x v. _._____.1 tiYyxYRp Sr., E 9 tFR'TS-~ .~._-. 1....~ -~. _ i ..M.~ by-7aAP Sr_....'! aEnrFts"., ~ C_u._,~~....,.._. }..;~'I.S1fGHlANOSAY.~ _.:.,.~ ._.._:,,~ ............................»_m__,~i x ' A1------~~-- ~, ~'a~ w. HId}ilRHbf RV. s ~ a ~.c CAHES v T Sf. c IANf9 W 715 . --.._..- _,,..., _ _,.__... - a _-.- ~ ~ h. ~, ~ - n ~ aiaaTNS7.----`~ - z w.7oraasr. '~ t _._, ..W..- y 5 w YPTH 57. ..._.,..,, i U YI M[bl ST. N'. 7PTIf ST. ~ ~ ; C~}NPVS wnY ~~~~-~ Vd-19TIt,ST..._._...... W. 59TH 5T. ~i _ _W. ikrH Sr, L.-........-.-,.-.-......--~~.... ~ € . aes" vim'"-H sr'.v'" x i ~ ~ r ~ ' - x ~- 47.7ACNrpHST ,~...~.. 14 E7[N ST ~ 1,... ~ z ~ i ~ I , 444 ~ ~ e ~ - - ~...., W. E6TA 3F- ', Y1.14Tl1SY. - l._. L... ~i E W{L5QN it ~LEFifl~i14TRRY SC~9t3p4, San Bernarciinn, Calii`urnia - i}~429: 03 i:X~ C EXHIBIT D a ~ xarra sr. j)y t3Fftk5tEV CY: ,F TttAF~1C SfG~tAE. ~--" ~ -°~.---.. .,.. „y,,,__ ~, 4 = SCHc]4i. CRQ551t~€Cx ~ "~ = -'~-~.. ."'-~ > SCFdCit3i. ~ Z 2 < ~ 2 2 =PEL7ESTRIA~IROUT~ {..~,..~- _.~..ya,,. ~-,4t__IY..7AYM5---.:',',.-w "n.-.., ~,_.w~:':"".,. ~ :_'"" _._"°=`' ~~...:..~' '..m-" ~ a o A°o~l~a~ . _ _ t- .~:.:.;a, -~°--' jjf -~-Y~x~°sr:~~:..._.. 7f ~ YJ. ALC7CAiiAL1i AY. ~ E ' z ,....... ,~ 9S '~ Wx7TN }T ,~, .e. .a., ~ YI x~Yf 15T. 7, $ '6'.,b.-...-..--... P -.... _ 18 ~ ~ p W 'SGTN S f F~- -1 ~ I::; I $_____._...^~ ~ .tea.-~~._ . -w,. _ . ___-.T~ t . I _ SY ]STti,,,,~ 4 i x { EY:kAtENTARY$tT44t3L I ! ~ ~ ~ .~~.:"°"..,,.,,., ~ '; :::.':Y. S L 6Y. 76£TI ST~'~~' ' ~..~-~~-y-- ~ „x~R~n :A SY L.l0.U ~f F Y~ RRROWVIFW t.~ 1 MlOb3.E SCTItlOL~ ~$ ~ W YYYGfiCAHgSAY~.~ ~ Id ~'~~ _ ..., _ ~ ~ ~ ~.,,eT ..__..,..-»..««...., ~...y YI.-F€3GHlAHAS AY. -~-._,_,_ ; x ~ ~- ~ ~..we......Y..-.--.._. i , Gl .......fir. ~~~"' r"..--"..-. Y1. LOTH $T.^ 444]]] ~ ' F W. xUTN sr. h ~ ,: li -~~ _ era-.._.»...... ~ ,.. ] ~ 14 x0Y{d ~Y:,.... ..-.. 1'P. aCPYd RT. .....-._..._.~ C'~......~««~:»:"..p.~. _ ~, `I ~~w.~207Fi~C. ~.~~L ~i..,~Y_ ~ ~ 1 -.~-....y.... ~ ., tAA4PN5 WRVS r 1 `~r W 59TH ST. ~ -~Y^^^ ~ 3 ..........,,m.M. ..................._w._ y -- . _.,.._._._._. W. L4Yy St,. ~ i C ~C C 3 j f -.N.^.^...w...^f!~~. f .............p~,,. t+ ~ 7~ 3 ...._.._......_y,,., ~ ,,,_u~ SRN &CRNAjttliHO ~ :"w~ tee."°.__.___,. L F!(6Ff SCH04L Y q ~ ~ ~ E ~ . F ~W. P_R&NiON 1r. 1 ~~-~~ W. T7rN ST: F _ q '~ 1 • r.......~.~._......... a) ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~.~..,..~~~. _ . ~ -~a....__. x 's'" ~ ~ tea.. w. FS7H 5Y. i ~ 4 l ~ ..,,m._. _ '~, ~ MW ^(~' 116 ~ E I_ ~ ~~~.-ae-• ~ ~,. ~ ~ .,~ I ..,~ T~ 4 mfr -w- _'""".,".."""' p f 'W ~filil.5~9R1 Il ~L~3V#E~17AFtY SCN~CJC3E, San k3~rnardinra, California - {f34~9: Q4 EXC. f3 i i Ci... a-~ T 1 /9 eRBb'lilt9S~ 3 H ~- ~ ~..- X.YJSdq 6d4iwRp ti -~ ~7i'~ - i~ 4 ~ "e ''~ \ ~ ;., ~ ~ ~ ~ tip` cr i i, ~ ~ ~ f~ '~ ;'~ I' "- 1,,. ~ 2 use S'l'Qfis $Jf~lV ~ ..~, \ `~,'e "F n 4 + ~ ~ ~\ti~,~~, w e~ ~`~i $"!; .`"°'Y'L:~'~' 3. ! H : ~, titi emu. ~ ~`' ; :l 'rr~ :~" 'ill. ~, ,`~~yq 4 ~ ~ ",~-i ~ . ^."] ~ C{ F ~ € "n-~ a ~~\"~e~~ y~~~ , _ _ a : sus ~ . _ . ~ r~ ~ SLOW EXPBT'TNG sGHOOS. sop ar~rv x~H~ 1 ~' E i~ i E 3 W11.SL~N ii EL~M~iUTARY StHCDbI.,_San gerr~ardii~a, California.-n342~: 05 EXB ~~~b~~.~ Wilson 1f Elementary School Drat Environmental Impact Report December, 2007 Appendix ~ Culfiurai ~e~ulfi ~fiudy r L~ ~L ~ONIT.~ G.~R~~Ns TRACT EVALL~.~.TION OF F~~STOR~C SIGNIFICANCE PURSUANT TO CF,QA WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EIR P~epa~cd ~U ~ San Bernardino City Unified School Distxict 1220 RESEARCI-3 DRIVE, SUITE B REDLANDS, CA 9237€ FINAL REPCIRT 160NITA GARDENS TRACT EVALUATION OP HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE _,.,:EXECU~`~V~ 9UMTI~ARY A historic resources survey, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act {CEQA}, was conducted far San I3ernaxdixia Unified School District (District) for the potential project known as Wilson II Elementary School, located between "G" and "F" Streets, and 25~h and 26t~' Streets in the city of San Bernardino, California. This area, originally known as "Bonita Gardens", includes 41 parcels, of which only one (lnt number 27) is currently vacant. This tract was approved in 1922 and was developed as a Period Revival Cottage working-class neighborhood d€xring the city's real estate boom of the 1920s. As elsewhere ui the city and state, develaprnent sharply halted following the October 29, 1929 stockmarket crash. Construction began again in the neighborhood in 1931, continuing through 1941 and the US entry into WWII. Only eight lots remained vacant at that time, including, parcel members 5, 8, 9, 17,23, 24, 27, and 40. This tract exemplified the 1920s building boom, and its northward expansion. The neighborhood of 1~eriod Revival Cottages remain as a cohesive neighborhood of the style and type. As such, the Bonita Gardens tract appears to meet the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) criteria Eor local significance as a historic district, with a period of significance Ernrn 1922-1941. Each dwelling constructed during this period was assessed for its historical integrity, and the dwellings determined to have experienced significant lass, were removed from inclusion. In summary, a total of 29 homes were deternvncd to be contxibutaxs to this potential local historic district. CEQA requires evaluation of project impacts on historic resources, including properties "listed ire, or detexixuned eligible For listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources jor] included in a local register of historical resources." In accordance with Section 15064.5 aE the CEQA Guidelines, "a project, which causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment." Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource is deEned as the destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or of the immediate surroundings, such that the significance of an historic resource would be materially unpaired. Thus, consideration must be made of potential historic properties in project planning. Avoidance of these resources is the preferred alternative. However, in the event that avoidance of a site cannot occur, the project development plans must be evaluated to determine whether the action would cause a "substantial adverse change" in the significance of the resource. If impacts to previously listed or potentially listed resources are unavoidable, proper mitigation is required. 2 ,. ,. ,~ r ~ The purpose of this historic resources survey was to assess the significance of the properties located within the proposed project area fax San Bernardino City Unified Schaal District's new elementary school, Wilson II, pursuant to CFQA. CEQA requires evaluation of project impacts an historic resources, including properties "listed in, ax determined eligible for listing in the California Register of historical Resources [or] included in a local register of historical resources." A resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR if it meets any of the following criteria: 1. Association with events that have made significant contributions to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the t7nited States. 2. Associations with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history. 3. Embodiment of the distinctive ch,:+~~•acteristr'cs of a type, period, region or method of construction; ar represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values. 4. Yielding or having the potential to yield, ir~fotmati<on important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation. The CRHR znay also include properties listed in "local registers" aF historic properties. A "local register of historic resources" is broadly defined in X5020.1 (k), as "a list of pro~ertie.r o~GZally designated or recognised as historically significant Gy a local government pursuant to a local ordinance or resolution." Local registers of historic properties come essentially in two forms: {1) surveys of historic resources conducted by a local agency in accordance with Office of Historic Preservation procedures and standards, adopted by ttze local agency and maintained as current, and (2) landmarks designated under local ordinances or resolutions. (public Resources Code 5024.1, 21844.1, 15064.5} However at present, the City of San Bernardino does not maintain a local register of historic resources. By defznitioza, the CRI~IR also includes all `properties formaly determined eligible far, or listed in, the National Kegister of Flistaric .Ialaces," and certain specified State Historical Landmarks. The majority of "formal detern~inatians" of National Register of Historic places (NRHp) eligibility occur when properties are evaluated by the State Office of Historic Preservation in cannectian with federal environmental review procedures (Section 106 of the Nakianal Historic Preservation Act of 1966 [36 CFR Part 800] [Section 106]). Formal determinations of eligibility also occur when properties are nominated to the NRHP, but axe not listed due to the absence of owner consent. The criteria far determining eligibility for listing an the NRHP have been developed by the National Park Service. A property zxzay qualify far NRHp listing i£ it: A. Ts associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history, B. is Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; C. Embodies the distr,rretive characterlsucs of a type, period or method of construction, or that represents the work of a master, or that possesses high artistic values, or that represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or 3 D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, iniaxrx~ation important in the prehistory or history. The minixnurn age requirement for the NRHP is SO years and fax the CRHR 45 years. Properties less than 50 years old may be eligible Ear listing on the NRHP they can be regarded as "exceptional," as defined by the NRHP procedures, or in terms of the CRHR, "if it can be demonstrated that .sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance." (Chapter 11, Title 14, ~4842(d){2)} According to the NRHP guidelines, the "essential physical features" of a property must be present far it to convey its significance. Further, in order to qualify for the NRHP, a xesnurce must retain its integrity, or "the ability of a property to convey its signzficance." The seven aspects o£ integrity are: • Location (the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred); • Design (the combination of elements that create the farm, plan, space, structure, and style of a property}; • Setxrt~g (the physical envixanmcnt of a historic property); • Matetrals (the physical elements that were catnlained or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to faun a historic property); ® Wor.~anship (the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period of history or prehistory); ® Feeirng (a property's expression of the aestlaeti.c or historic sense of a particular period of time), and; • Association (the direct link between an important historic event ox person and a historic property). The relevant aspects of integrity depend upon the NRHP criteria applied to a property. Far example, a property nomnated under Criterion A {events), would be likely to convey its significance primarily through integrity of location, setting, and association. A property nominated solely under Criterion C (design} would usually rely primarily upon integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. The CRHR procedures include similar language with regard to integrity. For purposes of NRHI' eligibility, reductions in a resource's integrity (defined as the ability of the property to convey its significance) should be regarded as potentially adverse impacts. This framework for evaluating impacts on historic resources is well supported in the historic preservation literature is the most generally accepted professional standard for evaluating ixnpacts. These integrity criteria are generally, if not explicitly, referenced in the CEQA Guidelines, which state: "an historical resource is materialy impaired when a project... [demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility fax, inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources [orj that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to section 502Q.1(k) of the Public Resources Cade ar its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of section 5Q24.1(g} a£ the Public Resources Code, unless tkze public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historicaIly or ', culturally significant." A lead agency is responsible far the identification of "potentially feasible measures to mitigate significant adverse changes in the ,sign~cance of an historec'al resource." The most current Cl?QA Guidelines adopted in 1999 clarify what types of measures may constitute mitigation of impacts to less than significant levels, and brings the Guidelines into conformance with recent court decisions in this respect. In 4 particular, they specify a methodology far deternvning if impacts are mitigated to less than significant levels. These are the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic i~ro~ierties ~a~ith Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating Restoring, and Recanstrzrcting Histarzc .Buildings and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Ke .habilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating historic ~3uildings (1995) (Secretary's Standards}, publications of the National Park Service. {PRC X15064.5{b)(3-4)) 'T'he purpose of citing the Secretary's Standards in this context is twofold. First, they have been developed and ref€ned over a period of several decades, and have become widely accepted as cornerstones of the practice of professional historic preservation in the United States. Secondly, they direct the development of mitigation neasures Cowards the substance of historic preservation, and away from palliative measures, such as the documentation of destroyed historic properties (San Bernardino General Plan 2005). Section 106 requires that federal agencies tape into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties, and to provide the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation {Advisory Council) with an opportunity to comment on such undertakings when the effects are considered to be adverse. These regulations were last revised on a comprehensive basis in May 1999. Tay reference, Section 106 reporting responsibilities also apply to local agencies utilizing federal funds For local projects, such as housing rehabilitation projects. The federal agency undertaking the project is technically responsible For compliance with the Section 10G regulations; however, in practice, the technical steps required to comply are sometimes delegated to the local agency expending the federal manleS. The faxst step in the Section 106 process is the identification and evaluation of historic properties within the Area of Potential Effect (APE). This ixnpaet zone is defined in the regulations as "the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist," and will vary depending an the scope of the undertaking and the character of the site and environs. l~Tistaric properties are defined Far the purposes of Section 106 as properties listed, ar eligible for listing, on the NRI-TP, and may include individually eligible buildings, structures, objects, sites, ar districts. Agencies are encouraged to consult with local governments, groups and individuals with knowledge and interest in historic properties during the determination of eligibility phase. The agency is required to consult with the State T-Tistoxie Preservation Officer (SHPO) on determinations of eligibility; the SHPC) is granted a limited period during which he/she may state concurrence or non-concurrence with the agency's opinion. Failing any stated view, the SHPO is presumed to agree with the agency. Unresolved disagreements between the ST-TPO and the agency, on the question of eligibility are resolved by a request by the agency to the Keeper of the National Register {Keeper) For a formal "determination of eligibility". if historic properties are found to exist withir~ the APE, the agency must determine if the undertaking will have an effect on the historic properties. A project is considered to have an effect on an historic property, "when the underta~in,~ may alter, directly or indirect, the characteristic' of a historic ~ro~er y that may quay the ~iroj~erty for inclusion in the i~Vatzona! Register." [36 CFR 800.5(a)(1)] The agency is required to characterize the undertaking as having either "no effect," an "adverse effect" or "no adverse effect," based on the Criteria for Adverse Effect ', detailed at 36 CFR 8005(a}(2). Adverse effects include the physical destruction, damage, or alteration ', of the historic property, isolation Erato its historic setting, the introduction of out-of-character visual, audible ar atmospheric elements, ox the neglect, transfer, sale or lease of the historic property. 1~ederal agencies are once again encouraged to consult with local governments, groups and individuals with knowledge and interest in historic properties during the determination of effects phase. [36 CF'R 800.6 (a}] 5 Tf an adverse effect is Found to occur, the agency is required to consult with the SHPO to develop methods to reduce the harmfulness of the undertaking. '1`he Advisory Council trust also be notified by the agency of the finding, and should invite it's participation in the consultation. This consultation process will sometimes result in a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) between the agency and ST-TPO. bailing agreement between the SHI'O and the agency, the regulations provide for the participation afAdvisory Council. ".r _ES.~ ~k ?' S ~ ~~~~S~f`iR.~.~~~.f~ri~~l,~ ~~~[~~~~~~tl~i,yt~'~~~~~i7U ~,~ ~ ~ ~~..,.,.. ~ ~w~: ~'~ ~ ~ A.: '' ~s~-.,W.,_ , ~-~~ "3n..;.....a".m,.~:"_:C~.. ' , .,~.:;~. ~.__~_~-a.. ^-s.._., ."~.~ ,M~. .a,..~r~ ,. ,a "'`~ -:. ,;' , ~ ~zf This survey was conducted by Kleinfelder for the San Bernardino City Unified School District. The project site is located in the City of San Bernardino, within the boundary a£ the San Bernardino South Valley, which includes the Shandon Hills about 1.2 miles northwest of the APE. The Santa Ana River is located approximately 4.5 mires south, and Lytle Creek about 2.4 miles southwest of the project area. The nearest surface water is East Twin Creek, located approximately 1.6 miles east of the project APE. The APE is situated southwest of the intersection of North "l~" Street and West 26t~~ Street, in the County of San Bernardino, California. The proposed project consists aF 41 parcels, encompassing approximately 362,614 square feet, or 8.34 acres; and is bordered by West 26~s Sheet to the north; North "G" Street to the west; Arrawview Middle School to the south, and North "F" Street to the east. North Berldey Avenue and West 25ts Street pass through. the center of the project area, north- sauth and east-west, respectively. Regional access to the project area is provided by Interstate 215 {T- 215), State Route 259 (SR-259), and State Route 30 (SR-30). Within the APE, there are 40 single- family residences and a large single vacant lot (U1~S 2005). ~' '' ~"'~.~..x ~ ..-r~''~ ~ ~?x 'xl = i~--»_"?-,.,.-~ '? .~..cM `-'.. <~,.~''cc~~~r- ~c~i» T~'M`g ~ '`~.,~a~aa ~ ~`,~ ~ r~,?~, ~ ".~.`. _''"°; ~~~,. -s,~ ~r~~~x ' .~,^°,,~' '^ y ~ r ~°.r' r~~~~~~~:e7~~~~~~~'`d y".,. "' -'~{s ....rx %:.»~ ~' .~"~ "S mazy, ~.,~- .r~ ^E"+ ~' 3 ~a.:~.ua ^,~ ice'' , ':? k1 ~ ~, ~3 x. ~, -`s.~. .t~~'' -'' ...a~~^~ rir ~ ~ ~ Tn 1991, acity-wide survey was conducted within the city ]units of San Bernardino, by Milford Wayne Donaldson. This reconnaissance survey resulted in numerous recommendations fax the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification o£ significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. No lacai register program has since been established, and no local historic designations of buildings or historic districts have been made to date. The APE associated with Wilson TT Elementary was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Eiistoric District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. A cultural resource assessment was perfor€ned by URS in 2005 to comply with CEQA and Section 106}. URS cultural resources records search was conducted by URS, at the San Bernardino County Museum Archeological Information Center (AIC), and at the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) an July 20, 2004. The records search encompassed the project APE and a'/4-mile radius around the project site. The ATC records indicated that the project site had not been surveyed for cultural resources. However, two previous cultural resource surveys have occurred within the vicinity of the project area. Additionally, one previously recorded prehistoric and three previously recorded historic resources, and faun previously recorded historic resources were identified as being located within a'/4-mile radius of the project area. G URS followed the records search with a "pedestrian architectural evaluation" project site, which resulted in the identifzeation of thirty-nine (39) potential historic resources, consisting of cottage style (Eclectic Revivals -Tudor and Spanish Colonial) single-family residential structures within the project APE. As a result, URS recommended further evaluation of the properties, and offered a €au€nber of Mitigation Measures to be applied to minimize potential adverse impacts to the resources: 1. DPR 523 A and B (Primary and Building, Structure and Object ~BSO]) Forms must be prepared for all structures constructed prior to 1960 by an 36CIiR61-qualified architectural historian or historical architect. If any individual structures or a potential historic district is identified as significant, as a result of investigation, a Historic American Buildings Survey (HAWS} Level 2 recordation must tape place, with the documents archived at the City of San Bernardino Planning Department, the AIC, and SHPO. Such. buildings should also be offered for relocation to a similar location within the City, prior to construction. 2. As the records search conducted at the AIC revealed known historic archaeological resources within a t/~-mile radius of tl~e APE. '1 a minimize adverse impacts to p©tential archaeological and paleontological resources, the fallowing measures shall be implemented: a. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, an axchaenlagical and paleontological resource specialist qualified to the satisfaction of the District shall be retained to monitor the project's subsurface areas during grubbing and land disturbance, from construction activities. Once ground-disturbing activities begin and vegetation is rerr€oved, an intensive pedestrian survey shall be conducted by the resource specialist who shaIl examine, evaluate, and determine the most appropriate disposition of any potential artifact in compliance with 36 CFR SOfl.13(b). b. Prior to excavation to a depth of more than 1 ~-feet below the modern ground surface, an archaeological and paleontological resource specialist qualified to the satisfaction of the District shall be retained, to conduct archaeological, and paleontological resource monitoring. The archaeological and paleontological resource specialist shall have the authority to temporarily halt work until any identified artifacts can be recovered, handled, and/or surveyed according to the resource specialist's direction. c. The local topographic gradient of the site area is generally flat, with a gentle downslope to the southwest. Although grading, excavation, and trenching are anticipated onsite, the proposed Project's construction and proposed future operations are not anticipated to destroy directly, nr indirectly, any unique paleontological resource ar geologic feature. However, pursuant to 36 CI~'R 800.13(b}, if an unanticipated prehistoric or historic cultural resource discovery is made during the coairse of construction, all work in the project site must halt, and an archaeological monitor shaIl evaluate the significance of the find. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 3. Tl€ere is no evidence that the Project site is located within an area likely to produce human remains. However, there is a slight potential for the inadvertent discovery of human remains during eartl€moving activities. l-Taman rezxaains include both burials and cremations. If Duman remains are discovered, further disturbance would be prohibited, and all work at the Project site zx€ust halt; and the County Coroner shall be notified immediately (Section 7fl50.5 of the California Health and Safety Code}. If Native American remains are identified, Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code requires the County Cnraner to contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC}, and specific measures far addressing the remains, shall then be taken. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 7 With mitigation measures incorporated into the project construction activities, URS anticipated less than significant impacts. i<.leinfelder was subsequently contracted to follow-up an the initial survey, completing mitigation measure #1. ^~~'a:~5. ~7~~»s~n., ~, w e'~.^.:`".°~.,'^~~ ~°'.~~ °°"^W~S~~,".:d, Via? ~~°z ;,...~`r~'.'~` ...w«~..~. `':.~ .s.-.. I~leinfelder reviewed all of the materials associated with the previous URS study, and followed up with archival research at the San Bernardino Feldheim Library's local history section. This included review of local histories, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, city directories, and historic photographs. Research continued at the AIC, and the City of San Bernardino Planning and Building Services Department, and the City Manager's C>ffice. Documents reviewed, included the General Plan Update (2005), historic tract maps, current maps, and building records. This inforznatian was summarized, and used Eor the development of a historic context in which to evaluate the AT'E. Following the archival research, a pedestriaza survey was undertaken, and all of the buildings within the AT'E were photographed, as well as adjacent neighborhoods identified as locally significant for potential districts, and historic overlay zones. The individual building photographs were integrated into the requisite DT?R 523 farms, and each building was evaluated within its context, and For its historic integrity. ~ 4 H "~ Prehistoric Period (source: U1Z.S 2005) Archaeological research in southern California has resulted in a scheme for regional prehistaiq that is generally accepted and represented by three broad temporal periods. 'T'hese periods are the Paleoindian period (12,000 to 8,000 years before present [B.PJ); the Archaic period, beginning between 9,000 and 7,000 B.P, and transitioning to the Late I'xehistaxic period at approximately 1,Ob0 B.P. It is important to Hate that the beginning and end for each period is Hat concrete because slight changes in archaeological assezrslalages, including artifacts and botanical and faunal materials are used to characterize each period and technological innovations often occur at different times. Archaeological assemblages are distinctive enough, to provide a summary of the major stages of the major cultural chronologies represented in southern California and San Bernardino County. Several regional cultural chronologies have been developed for the western San Bernardino County area (roger 1939; Wallace 1975, 1978; Tn€e 1958, 19GG, 1970; Meighan 1959; Moriarty 19GG}. Early archaeological sites in southern California are associated with the Paleaindian period and date to roughly 10,000 B.P. In the region, this cultural period is referred to as the San Dieguita tradition and is characterized by stemmed projectile points, leaf shaped knives and crescents (Wallace 1955). The San Dicguito tradition is best documented in the San Diego area where sites dating to this period are associated with the nomadic-hunter gatherers who focused on large game, shellfish collection, and fishing as primary subsistence resources {Horizon I; Wallace 1955). Around 9,(300 B.P. the subsistence and settlement practices of people living in southern California began to shift in response to changing environmental conditions associated with increasing aridity. The shift in environmental conditions resulted in Native Americans living in the region to have an increased dependence on seeds and acorns for subsistence ,reflected by greater frequencies of ground stone artifacts (hand mantis and metates) in archaeological sites (Horizon TI; Wallace 1955). New technological 8 innovations were also expressed in the archaeological record, with the larger projectile points associated with early occupations slowly replaced with smaller arrowheads (Note: This may represent a ,rh~ f'i'om large to .~mallergame such as Girds a~a~l small mammals). 'I'he fast appearance of ground stone assemblages in southern California is associated with the La Jolla Complex. In coastal areas, this complex focused on mollusks and small game for subsistence and inland gxaups focused on seed gathering and acorn processing. Later cultural horizons axe characterized by an increased use of mortars and pestles and the first manifestation of discoidals (Horizon III, spanning 3,000 B.P. to 230 B.P.). Interntnent is the form of burial associated with the San Dieguito and La Jolla periods (Strudwick et al. 1995). Around 500 B.P., the region saw another major shift in the technological innovations with the introduction of the bow and arrow, which is identiEted by the appearance of very small projectile points in archaeological assemlalages (William Self Associates [WSAJ 1999). Ceramics also became widely used during this period, milling stare assemblages are more prevalent, obsidian Pram the; Salton Sea appears with greater frequency, and the dead were cremated rather than buried (Moratto 1984). Ethnography The project area faIls within the traditional boundaries of California Indians that were associated with the Mission San Gabriel during the Spanish Period (1769-1821) (Bean and Vane 1979}. '1 here Native Americans were known as Gabriefino and Serrano (Kroeber 1925} and spoke a language that falls within the Copan Group of the Takic subfamily of the Uto-Aztecan language family. This language family is extrerraely large and includes the Shoshonen groups of the Great Basin.. Due to the close geographic proximity of Gabrielino and Serrano bands living in the area, and linguistic similarities, ethnographers suggested they shared the same ethnic origins (1~roeber 1925; Bean and Smith 1978). Correspondingly, these groups will. be referred to as Gabrielino in this document. Gabrielina territory extended from the San Bernardino Mountains to San Clemente Island, occupied most of modern day Los Angeles and Orange Counties, which is incredibly fertile land (Bean and Smith 1978). Very little is known about early Gabrielinn social organization because they were not studied until the 1920s (I~rneber 1925}, and had already been influenced by missionaries and settlers. I~roeber's 1925 work indicates the Gabrielinn were a hierarchically ordered society with a chief who oversaw social and political interactions bath with the Gabrielino culture and othex groups. The Gabrielino had multiple villages ranging Pram seasonal satellite villages to larger more permanent villages. Resource exploration was focused on village-centered territories and ranged Pram hunting deer, rabbits, birds and other small game to sea mammals. Fishing for freshwater fish, saltwater mollusks, and crustaceans and gathering acorns and various grass seeds were also important (Bean and Smith 1978}. Fishing technology included basket hsh traps, nets, bonefish hooks, harpoons, and vegetable poisons. Ocean fishing was conducted from wooden plank canoes lashed and asphalted together (Blackburza 1962-63; Johnson 1962). Their houses were large circular thatched and domed structures of tole, fern, or Carriza that were large enough to house several families (Johnson 1962). Smaller ceremonial structures were also present in the villages and were used in a variety of ways. These structures were earth-covered and different ones were used as sweathauses, others as meeting places for adult males, others as menstrual huts, and others as cerezxzonial enclosures (yuva'~j (131ackburn 1962-63; Heiner 1968}. 9 Historic I'eriQd Mission 0.769-1$22) (source: San .Bernardino General Plan 2005, .~~pendix93J This historical period constitutes the first organized attempt on the part of Europeans to colonize the remote western extent of the New World. The Mission/Pueblo/Presidio triad, a settlement strategy representing the clerical, civilian and military authority of the Spanish Crown, was implemented during the decades following the overland exploratory expeditions of Alta California conducted by Gasper de Portola in 1769-70. Althougkz the Missions are the most obvious surviving evidence of the period, other artifacts related to this period are known to remain in some areas. The first documented Spanish settlement within tlae San Bernardino valley was established in 1810. The site of this settlement was dedicated by pray Francisco Dumetz as the Rancho de San Bernardino of Mission San Gabriel. Its location is regarded by some historians to have been near the confluence of Lytle Creek, Warm Creek, and the Santa Ana River, a location within the present-day City of San Bernardino. In 1812, after a severe earthquake, a new hat mud spring appeared near the settlement, at what later became known as De Sienna Hot Springs. This event created apprehension among the non-Christian native population, who subsequently attacked the settlement, killed Christian neophytes and destroyed buildini;s. The Spanish padres abandoned their eapilla, or chapel, and returned to Mission San. Gabriel Far the next six years, only native settlements appear to have existed within the valley. In 1819, in response to raids from hostile natives, local Indians requested tlae return of Spanish padres. A second Rancho de San Bernardino was established at a sate known as the Guachama rancheria, located a few miles east of the possible original settlement in what is now the City of Loma Linda. Twn years later, in 1821, a branch of Mission San Gabriel, known as the San Bernardino Asistencia, was established one and a half miles to the east of the Guachama rancheria within the present boundaries of the City of Redlands. From this branch mission, the development of agriculture withua the valley began. Water was transported via aten-mile ditch, known as the Zanja, from Mill Creek to irrigate olive trees and vineyards. With the transition of political power from Spanish authority to Mexican control in 1822, attitudes toward land ownership and use underwent a major shift. From the period of initial settlement irz 1810 to 1839,sole control over lands in the valley was in the hands of the church. California's historic period is typically divided into three periods beginning with the arrival of Spanish explorers in 1769 and extending into the American period (186 to today}. In the project area, the establishment of Mission San Gabriel in 1771 characterizes the Spanish Period. Livestock and agriculture were introduced to the region during this period, and the Gabrieliao's traditional way of life was influenced by acculturation. The first explorers to enter the area were Pedro Fages, Military Commander of California, i.n 1772 and I~r. I^'xancisco Garces, a missionary priest, in 1774. On May 20, 1810, Franciscan missionary Francisco Dumatz, of the San Gabriel Mission, led his company into a valley. In observance of the feast day of St. Bernardine of Siena, Dumatz named the valley San Bernardino. 'I"his name was later given to the nearby mountain range, and later the city and county. A ranch outpost, the Estancia, was established in 1819 as a part of the Mission San Gabriel's Rancho San Bernardino (h~tp://tivcvw.cn.sanbernardino,ca.us/history.htrrl). 'I`he Mission soon became associated with agricultural cultivation, and the introduction of countless new plants into the valley. Pt~fen~a~Ip~Q~fertY ~3'1±es ~sanciat~d~~ t9ixs c~snte~t~ ,s adr~l~~s R ~~drlgifl~ ~ ,~'e3 ` ~' ~1315BXi3~k O~.t13Et31{ifil S ~ ~ ' SV~f~r ~~S#~IY1t5,, #~aE~C}1,~,s ~ • tx~ns c?~ta~an xcs~Ies F ~ 'k~J~$rres , 10 Rar?cho (1822-1847) (source: San Bernardino General Flan 2DD5, fllif~endix 93) Mexico's independence from Spain, and the political disarray which followed, resulted in the Mexican government's ditxiinished will to retain active interests in Alta California. "~'he Mission system was abandoned, and the lands granted to Mexican loyalists, and to a lesser extent, Anglo settlers. Land use during this period was characterized primarily by extensive cattle ranching and limited dry farming conducted over a wide expanse of Southern California. In 1839 Don Antonio Mario Lugo petitioned Perfect Pena of Los Angeles to request Governox Juan Bautista Alvarado for approval of an application to colonize land between present-day San Bernardino and Yucaipa. The grant was approved iii 1842, and the property- was named the Rancho San Bernardino. The Lugo family began developing their new land grant, relocating approximately 4,OOQ cattle and horses from their San Antonia Rancho in Los Angeles. They erected an adobe house at Agua Caliente, near the present--day San Bernardino County Courthouse in downtown Satz Bernardino; and Vicente Luga built a second hams near the site of the De Sienna hot springs. 1n 1843 Governor Manuel Micheltorena was petitioned to grant approximately 30,000 acres to Michael White (Miguel Blanca). The new land grant was approved and named Rancho Muscupiabe, occupying mast of the northwestern portion of the present-day City of San Bernardino. Blanco built a "fortress-like adobe" near the mouth of Cajon canyon. Nine months after moving to this new home, an attack forced him to abandon the rancho. 1=Fortunately for the valley, eastexn emigrants traveling overland tkzraugh the Mojave Desext first glimpsed the western plains of Southern Californa as they emerged from Cajon Canyon. Some were gxeeted by the Lugo's at the San Bernardino Rancho, and some undoubtedly returned to establish permanent residences. The gold rush also provided the ranches with opportunities to prnvisinn emigrants and noxthern settlements with livestock and other agricultural commodities. ~ct~e~~~~lsro~+~~ty~ ~e~ ~~sncia~~d ~watk~ tlaxs coi~tex~t~ • ~ xzat~spot<ta~t4za .~i~iates ~ ~ s. + ~ Sar~tet• s~?4t~ ~ 3 ~ E`t41fI~S,s ~ '" u 3 s '~ 'A~CJ~~i321 vJa@~ ` S 3 F ~ a~,rCcl~lt~tE3ra1 oLitl~ta11L1t21~;S ' ,, _ ~ ,~ The Spanish 1'criod ended in 1821, with the onset of the Mexican Period. 'l'he Mexican Period was ehaxacterized by large land grants that were given to people to encourage settlement of the region. By 1.$34 the facility was abandoned by the Mission, and the Mexican Decree of 5ecularizatian ended mission control in California. Brothers joss del Carmen Lugo, Jase Maria Luga and Vincente Luga, along with their cousin Diego Sepulveda, were granted tine to the San Bernardino Rancho by the Mexican Gavernnr of California in 1842. As a result of these grants, the cattle industry blossomed in the valley, taut was focused an treat production rather than dairy. Angle-Mexican (1$51-1882) (source: San .23ernardino General ,flan ZDDS, ~~pendix 73) Mexico's tenuous bald on Alta C:aHaxnia came to an end with the Mexican-American War of 1$46- : 4$. The influx of l~,uro-Americans during the decades immediately thereafter rapidly overwhelmed 1°lispanie cultural influences in Northern California; however, the far less frenzied migration of Euro- Americans to Sauthexn California during this period produced a polyglot Angles-Hispanic culture. l1 Urban settlements tended to coalesce around the previous centers of Spanish colonial life and commerce: the mission, pueblos and pxesidios. Rancho Life dwindled as disputes erupted aver rancho land titles, and a series aF drought years drained the profitability from cattle and sheep ranching. In 1851 the western portion of the San Bernardino Rancho, including some 37,700 acres, was sold to a group of 500 newly arrived settlers from the Mormon Battalion. Near the site of the Lugo family adobe, the Mormons erected a stockaded settlement called Fort San Bernardino composed of over 50 buildings, located near the present-day site of the San Bernardino County Courthouse. In 1852, Marmon brothers Amasa Lyman and Charles Rich staked the Centex of a new urban settlement, which was to become the City of San Bernardino. The town-site of San Bernardino was surveyed by Henry G. Sherwood in I853, the same engineer who laid out Salt Lake City. 'I'lze city was one mile square, with a grid of wide streets foaming the boundaries of eight-acre blocks. One block was designated as the Mormon Plaza, now known as Pioneer Park. The east-west streets were numbered one to ten from south to Werth, as they remain designated today, while the north-south streets received names, all of which were subsequently changed. In 1854 San Bernardino became incorporated as a city, one year after the County of San Bernardino was split from the counties of San Diego and Las Angeles. Its population consisted of approximately 1,240 inhabitants, 75 percent of whom were Harman. Over the next Few years, the character of the city reFlected the values of its chief inhabitants; but in 1857, Marrnons from across the county were recalled to Utah. Approximately 75 percent of the Mormons in San Bernardino returned to Utah, with approximately 30-50 families deciding to remain. Unsettled and unclaimed property of approximately 8,000 acres was purchased by William. Cahn and Associates who subdivided the land and sold it to the settlers. The agricultural character of the vaIley established during the Mexican and Mormon periods, continued to dominate the local economy. However, with continued development of the timber and mineral resources of the mountains and desert, the character of the city slowly emerged as a regional commercial enter. During the 1860s and 1870s the commututy grew slowly with a number of groups farming including the drama, library and temperance associations. The Methodist Church was established in 18G3 followed by the Congregational Church in 18G7. The small nucleus of the town included two hotels and several large businesses. A stagecoach ran regularly between San Bernardino and Los Angeles with mule-drawn freight wagons arriving from Salt Lake and other eastern cities. San Bernardino's early routes as a transportation and Freight center began at this time and escalated with the arrival of the railroad. 1'he mining trade served as as a modest stunulus to the growth aF the city as a supply center and staging area. ~n~e~~al ~r~?P~~ti~ des ~ssoc~~ted w~~ was cant~~t~ * , ~vc~nd f~~i'ree an~[l J~nd~dw~1~~ i r ~ r • to~S1~Tl~*r1:1211~L'lil~$ ~ s € r a ~ r ~ ; -. x`~ulis x 55 r ., s ~ ~ t i~ate~ S'9~t~~715 s s , r > z ~ ~r~nspaxta~to~z xrz~tes ' , ? ~ pul~ltc bldukg~ _ ~ ~ ~ x ~, ~~gixc~al"t~~~.:~.1 ntxt~iu~l~s.~ x...m_ ~....., ,. _ The Mexican Period ended with the end of the Mexican..American War, and transitioned to the American Period in M48. I 12 ~urv-Americanization (1883-1916) (source: San Bernardino General Flan 2005,1fppendix 73) The connection of Southern California to the national railroad network in 187G gave rise to a period of unprecedented regional growth and development. A mass migration from the Eastern United States and Europe beginning in 1885 was precipitated by a rate war between the Southern Pacific and Santa Fe railroads, and by the heavy promotion of the Southern California climate, agricultural potential and arcadian image-frequently by the railroads themselves. The real estate speculative bubble de#Iated abruptly in 1888, but not before scores of town-sites had been platted along the Southerna T'acific rail lines. By the close of this period, the rail system in Southern California would be completed and the econorzaic foundation for futGtre growth fizxnly established. The arrival of the railroad provided better and faster access for the farmers to bring crops tomarket. Packing houses and warehouses were built along the railroad corridors. The railroads also provided access to the county far tourists and immigrants alike. With the completion of rail connections between the desert and Los Angeles in 1887 by the Santa lie Railroad, San Bernardino soon developed into a railhead boom town. Commercial enterprises dominated the urban landscape, with emphasis upon service and retail establishment, while industrial enterprises supported agricultural development. Tn 1890 ahorse-drawn streetcar was established to bring visitors to the health resort at the Arrowhead Springs Hotel where visitors partook of the hot mineral water and mud baths. The city's development has been closely ].inked with that of the Satata Fe 13.ailroad and its important railroad shops and yards. By 1900 snore than 85% of the city's population was directly employed by the railroad, despite increased industrial and agricultural development in t:he following decades. With the center of the city established near the location of the Lugo's Aqua Caliente rancho adobe, the commercial core of the Ciry of San Bernardino grew slowly to the east, west, and north. Downtown businesses included hotels, restaurants, saloons, retail shops, and small service-oriented businesses. Property to the south, closer to the Santa Ana Diver, appears to have remained primarily agricultural. To the west of the core, transportation related industries developed around the Santa Fe rail yard. To the north and east of the core, relatively small agricultural farms and ranches dominated the landscape. Service industries slowly intermingled with the eastern farms, while Farms to the north developed into the priFnary residential district of the city. San Bernardino residents enjoyed cultural activities especially the Opera House first built to seat 900 in 18$3 and enlarged to 1400 seats in 1912. Playing to sold-out audiences were suckz notable performers as Lillian lZussell, Al Jolson, George M. Cohan and Sara Bernhardt. By 1926 the Opera House, no longex in vague, was replaced by movie theaters. Between 1900 and 1910 the population doubled from 6,150 to 12,799. During this tune a City Fall was constructed in 1901 on the corner of Third and D streets and a public library was built on l~ourth and D streets. The San Bernardino High Schaal was also built around this time. Tn 1910 the San Bernardino Chamber of Commerce was organized followed by the first National Orange Show in 1911. This popular show was held every year at the fairgrounds. I'vf~~tiatProperiyt~ea.as~ocrate~lu~~t~tis,c~~~xt , ~?- w~o~T ~x`afx azxd brick dwveltgs * °xaads 2 Y ~ Cz~mmer~ia(,l~locks 5 ~ ~ ~C1iLF~1"~t~S churches ..1~$ °s' :', ~ ag~eulal struc~res ~ roa~oad r~S,atEd buildgs acid r~ght~ of way;..... , 13 I~~x~n~xs~lsr~pe~ types assvciat~d dj t~s ci]~31t~xt4(cauf ~ ~ pubic b~sld~aags ,. r ~ ~a~,~~t~a~~~€1c1r€rgs ~ ,. r ~ ~varer~uses 5 ~ ; ~ ~clrrt~-~.o~t~s~s 3 ' ' r ' ~# •~- s~b1~s ~ ' ~ ' ~ Stt~~'tCak ~1~5'and, ~~~a11.~~5 ~ ; + l~z:lces 4 ~ ~ y Regional Culture (1917-1945) (source: San Bernardino General Plan ZDOS, /~j~pendix 73) This period is characterized by the establishment of awell-defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. Tn some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled ar replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Black on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both. built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was Built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took an the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal fundzng. Works Pxogxess Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, bath built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At tl~e end o£ the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the seco€ad time. In 1939 a new hotel was built. Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restauranttn San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. Howevex, with the advent of World Wax Tl, the development and expansion of Norton Aix .Force Base on the gxaunds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional txanspartatian center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads thxough the 20th century development of the automobile and thick routes. Route 66 was built thxaugh the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route 6G has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. P©~er~~a1 pt~perty types assoc~ate~.t1x ~s eoa~text•~ * ~ro~c1 fratx~c:=axzcl.bnrle c1we~~sags ~- • ~ xoads,lx~gl?ays ' ~ ~ , ~a~iex~~~l+acl~s clau~~hes~ : ''' ~ anc~ustna~'an~xaaan~~actur~~gxbutld~ags , y~ ~ Y1R~rQ11Q1~~aeS .z ~ z w ro~oad a,e.~ted b~c~gs ~ ~ . pubic k~u~g s ~no~e ~eat~rs ~ , 14 1~~ten~ial< pt~~~r~ apes assnci~ted; xvatla ~~s cont~~€C (coat , , ~ h S n j '- - ~ Y r i a + x~~~y ~'~~ezl€tz~s ° s ~ ,: a ~ 5 Postwar Suburbanization and Cold War (1946-present) (source: San Bernardino General Plan 2005, Af~j~endix 73) Following the Second World War (WWIT), the military presence in San Bernardino continued, as the , Army Air I=~`ield/San Bernardino Air Farce Base beca€ne one of three major maintenance facilities For jet engines. The base was transferred to the US Air Force in 1948 and was renamed Norton Air Force Base in 1.950. Operations expanded to provide maintenance, storage, and logistics support Ear various missile programs. In 1966 the base became home to the Gard Military Airlift Wing and Headquarters for the Aerospace Audiovisual Services. The base was selected For closure in 1988 and closed to 1994. Commercial growth continued throughout the city. Kaiser Steel opened a plant in nearby Fontana in the early 1940s. With continuing development, agriculture began to disappear from the San Bernardino Valley. The completion of the interstate highway (original Route 66) tl3rough San Bernardino, anal the new state freeways provided opportunities far development and enabled commuting. During the 19GOs, the population of San Bernardino reached nearly 100,000. The city continued its expansion to the earth and east. New shopping malls, churches and schools were built. A new public library building was constructed on 4th Street and Arrowhead, and the California Theater became the Civic Light Opera. California State College at San Bernardino was created in 1965. With the dec&ne of the Central Business District in the 1950s, the Redevelopment Agency was established in 1952 in order to revitalize the city. Redevelopment projects occurred near Meadawbrook Park and in the downtown business district with the opening of the Central City Mall in the early 1970s. A new city hall and convention center were completed in 1973. In 19$4 the San Bexnaxdinn County building was constructed. In 1977 the City aE San Bernardino Historical Society was founded for the preservatiozz a£ historical landmarks and artifacts, and in 1981 the arganizatian moved into the historic udge George E. Otis residence built in 1891 and donated to the organization by the Santa Fe Federal Savings and T.oan and the Pacifzc Savings and Loan. The building was restored as the "Heritage House" and is now run by the Ciry of San Bernardino Historical and T'ianeer Society, the two groups having zzzerged in 1982. In 1985 a new Central City Library opened, called the Feldheym Library in honor of lozagtime library board member Rabbi Norman Feldheyzn. The population in 19$5 was 185,000. In 1990-91 the Santa Fe Railroad relocated its offices and the city lost a major employer. In 1994 the closure of the Norton Air I^orce Base brought further economic downturn to the community. Pr~rentlal p~rctPerlY rYp,>€<s associated.~tl~ ~b~s ~ax~cext N z ~,v[apd fra€ia:~d"s~te~s r s • pu~lrc buzlclgs + ~DIY~Y3e~C~a~l71QGItS P ~ ~J~~C~~~S ~ ~ ~ k_~ , Bonita Gardens l~"Iistary and Associated Context The Bonita Gardens 'T'ract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. Zt was developed as aworking--class neigkzborizaod of I'exiad Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish. 15 Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 Feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of fzve roarras, including two bedrooms and one bath. As such, dais tract {aka the APE} is associated with the "Regional Culture (1917-1945)" historic context. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32}, and it is assumed that this building served as the rnadel home. The next horse was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 192'x, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25~' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 {lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lnt 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with floe completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), Four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (fats 1, 2 and 19}, and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into ~X~1I, and did not commence again until 1947 {lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last rexnainirag lots were in-filled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final hoanes, although constructed on similar Tots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. ,E w~, This tract exernpifzed the 1920s building boom, and its northward expansion. The neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages remains a cohesive neighborhood of the style and type. The Bonita Gardens tract appears to meet the CRHR and NRI-lP criteria far local significance as a historic district, with a period of significance from 1922--1941. As such, each dwelling constructed during this period was assessed for its historical integrity, and the dwellings determined to have experienced significant loss, were removed from inclusion. In summary, a total of 29 homes were determined to be contributors to this potential local historic district. As previously stated, CEQA requires evaluation of project impacts on historic resources, including properties listed in, or detemuned eligible fox listing in, the CRHR. Thus, the impact of the proposed project on these 29 buildings must be assessed. 1n accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, "a project, which causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment." Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource includes the destruction or relocation of the resource. Thus, consideration must be made of these potential historic properties in project planning. Avoidance is the preferred alternative. However, In the event that avoidance of a site cannot occur, the project development plans will. need to be evaluated to determine whether the action would cause a "substantial adverse change" in the significance of the resource. Tf these impacts are unavoidable, proper mitigation is required. The Mitigation Measures proposed by UR5 (2005) should be followed to reduce the itrapacts of the projects on the historic resources. 1G 17 State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION FIRI # ~~IM,~~~ ~,~(~~~~ Trinomial NRWP Status Code 3CD Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name nr #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 22 P7. Other identifier: 2502 N, Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. ILocatian: ? Nat for Publication Q Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. A€tach a Location Niap as necessary.} *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/a SE of i/a SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: 2502 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92408 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN {G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-171-08-0-1100 *P3a. Description: (Cescribe resource and its major a€ements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, se#ting, and boundaries) This is a single-story "L"-shaped cottage, with cross-gabled roof, and Gothic Revival features. The projecting front gable of this wood clapboard clad dwelling is defined by a rectangular, louvered window, centered above an arched tripart picture window. A wrap_around porch (housing the main entry door} within the "L", has been remodeled and extended to the rear, and incorporates a wrought-iron railing.. Measuring approximately 1,525 square feet; this building sits on a parcel totaling approximately 0.1722- acres. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: QBuilding ?S#ructure ?Object ?Site ?District [~1Element of District ©Other (€so€ates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawing Photo re aired for buildin s structures, and ableets.) PSb. Description of Photo: {View, „~,~~'~~~~ ,.. ~ ~, ~~'<~~~'~~~ s <~, .,. date, accession #) m ~r4 ' ~"'-` ~" '1 " ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ View of the southeast earner of the Sr~~ry~ ~~~- ~~, building; taken 1012312007; digital. . 'W ems,. ~ 1. ~' .F'~ 1 ~ 6N ~ ~ - - , f ~~~, ~ *P6. Date ConstructedlAge and ,~ ~ ~ a ,, ,~ Sources: C~Historic r ~ ~ ~ $ e~~~ ?Prehistoric ?Both v ~p~~ ~z 1931 {URS: 2005DataQuick) ry 14*.. F,,,~;, ~ u' ~, f f *P7. Owner and Address. Janes Hill ~^-~ ~'`~° 2502 N. Berkley Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92405 r ~ P8. Recorded by: (Name, ~ ~ ~ ~ '~'~ affiliation, and address} a , ~' =r;, Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ ~'*~' Kleinfelder .~, ~ _ ~'~ ~~d~~~~ ~ ~ 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ,,. -~ :~' ~ ~'' ~ ~ ~ 3°~~,~ ~ `'~ Redlands, CA 92374 ~ k ~ , ~, ~.rf ,~~,, ~ '3;s~ - ~.a*z s~' ~ ~ ~, rw ~ P9. Date Retarded: ( ~~cN ; ~,~ _~" '~~~`~.) ~~~A ~- ~ ~, ~ ~ November 8, 2007 u", nv a Mx .,~~= ~' ~ _ ~,~; *P70. Survey Type: (Describe) s ~ „x:. #~~.~~ Fw , ~~, *'~r~ ~ CEQA -Wilson Il ElR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Oata Quick; Historic Praservatian Element City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); bMNI Wilson Il Elemen#ary {URS 2005) *Attachments: ©NONE ?Location Map ?Sketch Map L~Continuation Sheet I~Build'ing, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaealogical Record ©District Record ©Linear feature Record ©Milling 5tatinn Record ?Rock Art Record ©Artifact Record ?Photagraph Record ©Other (List): t7PR 523A (1195? "Required information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARISS AND RECREATION HRI# ~IJIL®~tdG, STR.tJC~"[JRE, AN® ®~J~CT REC®R® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 3CD *Resource Name or # (Assigned fay recorder) Bonita Gardens, t.at 22 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lat 22 62. Common Name: 2502 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 63. Qriginal Use: Residential Dwelling B4, Present Use: Residential Dwelling *85. Architectural Style: Gothic Revival Cottage *BB. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1931. Re-roofed {1 011 911 98 8). (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *B7. Moved? ONa ?Yes ©lJnkno?wn Date: Original Location: *B8. Related l=eatures: The property is also developed with aone-car garage. 88a. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *870. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR3/NRc {Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005) Regional Culture (1917-1945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- deftned regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. in some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took nn the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Gasa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding, Works Progress Administration {WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High Schnol and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hail on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005). {San Buenaventura, 2005) See: Continuation Sheet. 891. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) SAN B;rRNARDiNR CITY US© *612. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson) Tract wils~ olaeR~TVObs~~ sHia°r~vPSlr~ Map, Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino ~ _,,, , 0 General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura ~ ~ ~,~, °-r-- sr~r 8 Research Associates) ` ° ~, „ ~ ° ° ~ --^ R p st f ° t! Ss ftl (jj ~ A ~, ° ~ i0 L C7 0 C 873. Remarks. ~ Aa.~K~~ R -R °h This resource is located within the proposed development area for the ~ °„~,~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ° ~ fr a ,r'? ~ Wilson ll Elementa $Gttnpl PrO~ect; and is bein evaluated ursuant to ~ ° ~ >:e eo n ~ ~h,~., ,"., rY 1 g p ~ '~ ~ ~ ~7 fY CEQA. --~ ~wM ~~rR E ~ ° p ra a . *B74. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ °__C'? ~m ~ (--e. *Date Of EValuatiOn: NOVember 5, 2007 ~ ze zr G} " ~ ° ~ fs r ~n ° ~, ss 0 p ° Q n ee Q ° ~ u m ~ G ~ ~ f6 A ~ u~: ri u.ur,,,~+suw I (This space reserved for official comments.) ' ,-~afa, ~ ta ~ ~ ~aa- -^~ °17 ~ -~~ b LLL //~~,, C /^, ryry ry~ /~~ ~ V ~ v0 ~ 4Y V ~g V <'_}e t -r ~ sr ro atl atl ar dtl atl ar am ar ar A7 I , I r d•A YxmLL LSni~ Srtsfo AmYy R,paY4a G'GO {eA4J p dnmi /' rtrzarcrtrw•bn ~R RaMad ~V. YxdN State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRf# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name ar # 25Q2 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino/ Bonita Gardens, Lot 22 *Recgrded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *Date: 7'115107 ®Continuatinn ©Update Context cant. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first Mc©onalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1944s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,900 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War 11, the develapment and expansion of Nartan Air Farce Base an the grounds of the San Bernardina Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardina continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century develapment of the automobile and truck routes. Route fib was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this confext include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita. Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 134 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1522 and 1939 measured roughly 954 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the made! home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and fat 18 in 1926. The primary construction tank place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25t~' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (tots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (Int 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did oat commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. 'The last remaining lots were in-tilled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the ariginaf tract, resulting in more massive, box-Nike designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardina, as weft as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1931, as part of the 2"d phase of the original tract design, maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. €7PR 523E (1195) "Re aired information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary !# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION hRl # Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CD Other listings n/a Review Cnde Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 16 P1. Other Identifier: 2503 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ? Not for Publication C>~ Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/4 SE of '/~ SE of See.28; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: 2503 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN {G,P.S.} e. Qther Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-173-10-0-000 "P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries} This dwelling is a Classical Revival Cottage with aside-gabled roof. It is single-story in height, and is clad with stucco and masonry. Rectangular in shape and totaling approximately 951 square feet in area, it sits on a 0.1612-acre lot. The primary elevation is dominated by a full-width porch, supported by three painted brick Doric pilasters, The entry door (protected by a security door} and three aluminum slider windows are located within the porch, A painted brick chimney is visible at the right side elevation. '~P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: ©Building ?Structure ?Object ?Site ?Districk QElement of District ?Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a Phata ar Drawin Photo re aired for buildings, structures, and objects. P5b. Description of Photo: (View, ~ W ~,< , r~~..~ 4a, , a ,!1 date, accession #) fi~ + View of the southwest corner of the "; ' ~ y , , ' ~ building; taken 1012312007; digital. > ~ x.. *P8. Date GonstructedlAge and :`f c Sources: L~IHistaric "'~r f ©Prehistoric ?Both i ~ ,~ 1927 {URS: 2005 DataQuick) ' ~l. k~ ;K r *P7. Owner and Address: ; ~ hamel Mar .tahnsan nd Mary y a S . 2503 N. Berkley Avenue d e ~ t ~ ~ San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~r ~ ~ ~, . 4 ,~, ~;~°- ~ ~, ",~' *P8. Recorded by: {Name, t atfliation, and address) Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP Kleinfeider 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ~'°~~` ~ '° ~ Redlands, CA 92374 r, *P9. Date Recnrded: ',•~ November 5, 2007 *P16. Survey Type: (Describe) CEQA-Wilson I! EfR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991} Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson Il Elementary (URS 2005) *Attachments: ?NONE ©Location Map ?Sketch Map OContinuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record ?Archaealagical Record ?District Record ?Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ©Rack Art Record ?Artifact Record ©Photograph Record ©ather (List): l7PR 523p (119Sj *Required information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRl# Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 3CD *Resnurce Name or # {Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lat 16 61. Historic Name, Bonita Gardens, Lot 16 B2. Common Name: 2503 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residen#ial Dwelling 64. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Classical Revival Cottage *86. Construction History: (construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1927. Fireplace {712411995}; re-roofing (1 111 311 972}; plumbing, electrical, and building including stucco, doors, windows and porch (5120/1995). (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *[37. Mowed? QNo ©Yes I~tlnknown Date: Original Location: *138. Related Features: The property is also developed with cone-car garage. BBa. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *810. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR31NRc {t3iscuss importance in terms of historical or architectural content as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identifed in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005} Regional Gulfure (1977-9945). As described within the adopted rr~unicipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a wel[- defned regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store bath built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as wail. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The Cali#ornia Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona Sehaol in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on B Stree#, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." {San Buenaventura, 2005}. See: Continuation Sheet. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) SAN SERNRRG71N0 CITY USA *B12. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract ~d1L pROPERTY'QWNERSHIVtlo~~sks~ Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ~- -..-- -~ . t as,e~ sr~r R Research Associates). j ~ ° ~ as ,T n ° ~"`~; ° '~ e ,'n` " ~ , 1h.Mww. ` H~nk¢..,..,. ....,..... B.CMm iF~ O EJ. Remarks: a n,,.,.vG~ »?t !a "p F ° Qa f0 B ° This resource is located within the proposed development area far the %~ d~„~~ as m ~ ° ~ ~ ° ~ „ ~ n " ~' Wilson 11 Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ° p .~a BO p ° ~ ~ p ,~ ..t~ Y.•,ww IC. Max CEQA. - ° ~ ,. Y,, MKS., .::Fr q ' ,gym. ~ ° ~ !d a p 2T ~r ° *814. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ® °~,~ " ° ~ ° ~ *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ g~ ~, xe x. ~ :k xl ~ ~ ~a r n ~ ~ l '$- R _ ~~.&0 BB g /~ ° II ° Q ~ ~ V',a d ~ ~ {TttiS Space reserved for Official COmment5.) ~-!G"'~za~, °fi" -o'~ q"' p ~.~;q~at. 0 5 #s'ra q°"~~~`°'~~ ' 'i' ~a CF Q6 C G C~ O~ CA ry t +r ~a ati a9 n se ae as as as a, so ~, i ~ r Y~bR 1aM S pu F'B'n1yfYOn'YgkC ($F~) Q {Trt'IId.OIRi,I{/},,.. wnmxcutnrn'.n,+ !i Ft¢~IeA 1'SGYM _ _ State of California ---~-- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANl7 RI~CREATIQN HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 25D3 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino) Boni#a Gardens, Lo# 16 ~'Recarded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., RICA *C1ate: `1'115107 Continuation ®Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDnnalds' hamburger restauran# in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War ll, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck sautes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Manisa between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potenfial property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Catkages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five roams, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32}, and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6}, followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1826. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 17 homes, located primarily long 25t'' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10} in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three fats in 1932 [lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 {lots 7 and 11}, and three in 1939 (fats 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 {lot 8}, and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in ~Iled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar Iots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recnmmendatians for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c}, as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "errtbadies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1925, as part of the original tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523E ~i95 "Required information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary ## DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECRt=ATION HRl # Trinomial NF2HP Status Cade 3CD Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name ar #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 21 P1. Other identifier» 2512 N. i3erkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1lV; R.4W ; %4 SE of '/4 SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino ~3.M. c. Address: 2512 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN {G.P.S,} e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, eft., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0'[43-171-07-0-000 *P3a. l3eseription: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This building is a single-story "L"-shaped Eclectic Period Revival Cottage, with cross-gabled roof, The projecting front gable of this stuccoed dwelling is defined by a round, louvered window, centered above a tripartite window (central fixed sash, flanked by two eight-light units}. A porch within the "L", incorporates amulti-paneled entry door followed by another tripartite picture window. It is supported by two stuccoed piers. Measuring approximately 2,623 square feet; this building sits on a parcel totaling approximately 0.1722-acres. Based on its size, this building has clearly experienced numerous remadelings and additions, *P3b. Resource Attributes: (l..ist attributes arsd codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: ©Building ?Structure ©Object ?Site ?District ~lElement of bistrict ©Other (Isolates, etc.) PSa. Photo ar Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and ob'ects.) P~b• Description of Photo: {View, •t~ data, accession #) View of the southeast corner of the building; taken 1 012312 0 0 7; digital. P x *P6. Date ConstruatedlAge and Sources: C>~Historic ,~ ©Prehistoric ?Both 1932 {URS: 2005 DataQuick} F~` , ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~-.,~ ~ *P7. Owner and Address: '~ s, ' ` ~ ,~`~~` ~' r 3, F.~, µ, ~' Inez Cecil TR {trust) ': 249$ N. G Street y ~ ,~ s ~" :,; ~,W,,~ ,~,~. ~ ~~~,~~~^~'. ;,~ „ San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~, ~ *Pt3. Recorded by: (Name, ' ~'~ ~"~: ~-~,'°'"~ affiliation, and address) ~, ~'~~ affiliation, and address) `~""~~ `~~"~>~: Andr+~a Urbas, M,Arch., AICP ~,;~,~ ~r..• ~~~~~.X> Kleinfelder v 1220 Research Dr., Ste B 4' ~~z' ~ ~~~~,~,~ f ' ' k' , Redlands, CA 92374 ~ i ~ *P9. Date Recorded: ~, ~ ~"}~ ~' ~`r November 5, 21307 Y ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~'~ *P1Q. Survey Type: (Describe) ~~" ~ ' ' ~~,,~ ~~,~~~ ~',;~ . CEQA -Wilson Il EIR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson 1991} Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005}; DMND Wilson Il Elementary (URS 2005) *Attachments: ©NONE ©Location Map ©Sketch Map ICantinuatian Sheet QBuilding, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaeological Record ©District Record ©Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ©Artifact Retard ©Photograph Record ©Other (List): DPR 523A (1l95) *ttequired infnrmatinn State of California--The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PAR}CS AIVD RECREATION HRIII DU[L®IIVC~, STRUDTURE, ACID ®~JECT RED®R® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 3GD *Resource (dame or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 21 B1. Historio Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 21 B2. Common Name: 2512 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 63. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Cottage Style (eclectic revival -Tudor _ Spanish) single-family residential structure. *B6. Gonstruction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1932; however, no anginal building permits were available for review. Re-roofed house with composition shingle roofing an 310212005. (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). ~`B7. Moved? ONn ©Yes ©Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. BSa. Architect: Unknown. 89b. Builder: Unknown *810. Significance: Theme: Residentia! Architecture Area: San Bernard'Ina, California Period of Significance: Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Grifieria: (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as de#ined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified 'in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005} Regional Culture (1917-1945). As described within the adapted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In same cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was canstructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California -(heater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings #ook vn the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Publ'€c Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005} See; Continuation Sheet. 131'(. Additional Resource Attributes: (fist attributes and codes} HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) sa,~€ e~~zr~a~rnin~a crrr vso *812. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract poop ~v~e s~iEV~a Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation 1=lement City of San Bernardino ~ General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context San Buenaventura ~ ~ ~Ya -;r° ~ Research Associates. I~° ~ za =r n ~ a r ~j B13. Remarks: ~ ~, :~$ n ~ p ~ ° ~ =o ~ n %: S` ~ ' o~ o n This resource is located within the proposed development area for the „„~, R° " n ~ ~ ~ " ' „~'? ,d CIQA II Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to _ ~ ~'~5„t? ~ ~P ~ O _m ~ ~ ~'~ a Q, R t ""814. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AIGP O y~ ~ "~ e...~nG.~. ~ a. ,_, _ °j : ° o r _ ~ (F) e6 C ~ *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ n ~a =e n " n r r..n.,,__ wsfn ,5 c n..,w .,., °s K. ~ ° OO zs es D* ° " ~ ° t~7 rs n E7 ° ~ uwa n' Jiu: 4rWF.WxMIV _..FG --~ -Zlf7w _-.....I.........,.. I (This space reserved for official comments.) i acr... bre qy._a~i . ~ : ~s+~ Q.~. a+~ & $ m a ftRiry ~_g w '~-yIIII -.4<p <I R6 SC b! b7 3~tl D! df 83 df d1 SO ~ E 1 ~i..cv.xFwnx 5'rsyaPmoYVROdaa~ro 14GR1 nAm+a,4u~saa Ga:u~alnsYM,i ~ &arlttf ?V Vars~x _ State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # bEPARTMENT OP PARKS ANL7 RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 2512 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bemardinol Bonita Gardens, Lot 21 ~Recarded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *C?ate: 1115107 ~ Continuation D Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 194D. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to Serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago Ya Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route fib has been replaced by the 1.15 in San Bernardino. potential property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the Gity in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 13D x 5D feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 7939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 7922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 {lot 6), followed by Int 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25i~' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 1D) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 {lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 {lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 {lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (Int 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950x: Ints 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 4D in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar Tots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Efigibifity Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay 2:one and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Trac#, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion {c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion t13, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and geriad...". This building was constructed in 1932, as part of the 2"d phase of the original tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523E (1195} Required informatiar~ State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DIwPARTMPNT OF PARKS AND R1wCRl;ATIQN h1Rl # P~~MId#~~ Trinomial 1VRHP Status Cade 3Gp Other Listings Review Cade Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 15 P1. Other Identifier: 2513 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©l~ot for Publication Q Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardina Gounty and (P2b and Pte or P2d. Attach a Location Nlap as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5" Quad; San Bernardino North Date: T.1tV; R.4W ; '/a SE of '/a SE of See.2t3, San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: 2513 N. Berkley Avenue Gity: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE~l mN {G.P.S.) e. Other Locational data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, a€evation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 01€9-173-11-R-OQO *P3a. Description: (Describe resnurce and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This building is a single-story wood..framed, "L"-shaped cottage with cross_gabled roof, and Spanish Colonial Revival features. The projecting front gable is defined by a rectangular, louvered window, centered above a rectangular one-over-one double-hung window. The prirttary entrance is protected by awrap-around porch supported by simple wood posts, and is located within the "L", with an arched picture window (located to its right). It measures approximately 1,006 square feet; and sits an a 0.1492-acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HPZ *Pd. Resources Present: lBuilding ?Structure ©Object ?Site ©pistrict QElement of pistrict ©Other (Isolates, eta) P5a Photo or Drawing (Photo regwred for buildings structures and objects.) P5b. 1escription of Photo: {View, r k ~~' t ~ ,~ date, accession #) ~'.~~ `~;' ,~ ~ ~ ,, View of the southwest corner of the ~ ~~, ~ ' '' t- ' , building; taken 1 012312 0 0 7; digital. ~ ~ i ~ ~ a~ ~, ~, :~'~~~, ^ ~ ~`P6. Date ConstructedlAge and ~, _ + ,.',''~ ,' i ~ ,,-~;~ ,_ Sources: ©Historic ,;:~ ~ ClPrehistoric ©Both ~fi~ '~'~ "4 - 1937 (URS: 2005 dataQuick) ,, ti "' t '' x *P7. Owner and Address: ,4 ~' "'~~L~' `.t~, j 'f~~2<" ~ Edward Andersen and parlene k i ~,~~ ~ ,y ~ ~ > Tree ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s z ~ ,:' 2513 N. Berkley Avenue ~,~~ . ~ z ~, ~ "W . s ,. ~ '~ I= San Bernardina, CA 92405 ~ ~ ^~' ~' r ~,~~ ~ ~i j15 ' ~ ~ ~' *P8. Recorded by: (Name, ~ ~ , {•, ~, a~lllation, and address) ~-`: Andrea lJrbas, M.Arch., AIGP Kleinfelder ~~,~~~ 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ~r'y~~y~~' ~ Redlands, CA 92374 ~ g~ ~ - ~w ~ ~'sr~~??~Y. z,.av~i `;°".,~~ *P9. Date RBCOrd$d: "d.~,1,3" `wk's ~ ~ „ ,r ,..~+ < .,rr - ~ ,~. - „f,~?~~~ November 5, 2007 "~ `" ~~~~k ~'"~`"~'~"~r ~ ~~'' f~.,~._.~ -fir )/l~w ..3~ ~ rr ?' "~ , a~"~t~...~~~ ~- ~ *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) zz~ CEQA Wilson ll ElR *P11. Report Citation: {Cite survey report and other sourves, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; pate Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson ll Elementary {tJRS 2005) *Attachments: ONONE ©Location Map ©Sketch Map QContinuation Sheet C~16uilding, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaeological Record ©District Record ?L'€near Feature Record ©Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ©Artifact Record ?Photograph Record ©Other (List): dPR 523A (1195} "'Required information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTtViENT OF PARKS AND RBCREATtON HRI# ~IJIL®1NG, ~TRU~TURE, AIV® ta~JE~T REC®RD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 3CD `Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder} Bonita Gardens, Lat 15 61. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lat 15 B2. Common Name: 2513 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival Cottage *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1937; chain linked fence {1012311957); patio cover {'11128!1950); partial enclosure on the patio for washroom {111911960}; re-roofing (912111961}. (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department}. *BT. Moved? C~JNo ©Yes ©Unknown Date: Original; Location: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. BSa. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *B1t). Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-9941 Property 'Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR31NRc (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Alsn address integrity.} This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2006) Regional Culture (4997'-9945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accammndate this growth. In snme cases Hider buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Cnurt S#reet, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005}. See: Confinuafion Sheef. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) s,~~v s~errru~tilean cITY use VtrIL9CN IE ELEMEF7TkRY SC€1nnL SITE *B12. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (C3analdson} Tract ~~zaw~a~rvnwwsaswivnnav Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino ~ s ~}5 General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context San Buenaventura ~ E --- srr~r ~ Research Associates. I ~ ;~, za rr.«.n.~.m<rx ~ t >a r ~r ~'' ° P< ran o n ,o Q , B13. Remarks: ~ --- "°" ~ °' This resource is located within the proposed development area for the ~ ~wPa ~ Mom t ~ ~~.<,~'?...~~ a Wilson II Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ~ ~d o f¢ o ~ i= ~ ° Q re < ~ „," ~ --- ~rz CEQA. i s:a:x h` d ra a p *B14. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ o °,~~ Y< < ~, o ~ ~ $ -~ " ,a r ° *Date of Bvaiuation: November 5, 2007 x 5 ~ za PY ~ ~,~< Aq r t`;,,,c~ ~ 0 w ....................rxh. 1A1 urs+.a.xe.~r%. oxi~..~ c.w.w.e k..,.. ~~1.- i (This space reserved for offcial comments.) ~"' PS~ Kn. ~i . wr . c+s ..~, au _ ~x$ ~x:±. , eaa . ~i a ys a ~ a p o~ R y n ~ a 6 n ~ o a ~ a ~ a qt' ~,f w as - ae n ae as aq as as as au 3 F f/~~ Vecm11v1M Cr~W F3++Yy1kNh++M ISFR) ®pzrta QGrl{aU Y ~ W.tcincvfeuxn ~ ifar:~ui.... State of California -- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AN17 RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 2513 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino) Bonita Gardens, Lot 15 'Recorded by: Andrda llrbas, M.Arch., AICP *D~te: 1'115Itl7 ~ Continua#!on ? Update Confexf conf. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in Ban Bernardino in 194x. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 4D,DOD was employed by the Santa 1=e Railroad. However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to San#a Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: woad frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, carnmercial blacks, railroad depo#s, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, reads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Banifa Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved nn May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclec#ic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five roams, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was sample#ed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1527, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25~r' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one lint 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three Eats in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and #hree in 1939 (lvts 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1946. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950x: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting !n more massive, box-like designs. Nisforfc Significance and ElFgibilify Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recnmmendatinns for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be po#entially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c}, as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1937, as part of the original tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523L {1)95) "Required information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RlSCREATION IiRI # P~I~~~Y ~E~~~® Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6U Other listings Reaiew Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, I-at 14 P1. Other Identifier. 2525 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. location: ©Not far Publication ~ Unrestricted ~'a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a t-ovation Map as necessary.) **b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; °/4 SE of '/a SE of Sec.28; San Bernardinn B.M c. Address: 2525 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. tJTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN (G.P.S.) e. Other locational Data: {e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-173-12-0-000 *P3a. Clescription: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The building is a single-story, stucco-clad wood-framed structure, roughly "F"-shaped in plan, with across-gabled roof. The projecting wing is defined by a small louvered ventilation window below the front gable, surmounted above a rectilinear window with an aluminum awning. Recessed, to its right is a small bay with arsine-unit glass block window. To its right is a small porch covering the primary entrance and paired four-over-four double-hung windows. Numerous modifrvations have been made to this 1937 dwelling, measuring 1,325 square feet in area, and sitting on a 0.1492-acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (t_ist attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: CBuilding CJStrueture ©Object ©Site ©District ©Element of District ?Other (Isolates, etc.) P6a. Phatn ar Drawin Photo re aired for buildings, structures, and objects.) P5b» pescription of Photo: (View, date, accession #) View of the southwest corner of the building; taken 1 012 312 0 07; digital. `~~~~"~ ~s~~` ~ { . ~ *P6. TOate ConstruetedlAge and '~ Sources: ©Historie q k~ ©Prehistnric ©Both t a, a r 3~;~F. i ~ }~;;': 1937 {URS: 2005 DataQuick) t *P7. Owner and Address: ri ~•, ~ ~'r '~ " ,James DaWSan ~' ~ ~``~`' ~~y~~ yL~ 2625 N. Berkley Avenue '~ F ~ ~ San Bernardino, CA 92405 i ~ r..: *P8. Recorded by: (Name, t' ~ ,,, ~ ~ ~ 1 affiliation, and address) ~,~ ' ~ ~,~ Andrea Urban, M.Arch., AICP ~" ~ ''~ ~ "~ Kleinfelder 1220 Research Dr., Ste B "~° Redlands, CA 92374 *P9. Date Recorded: November 5, 2007 ~~9~,R *P10. Survey Type: (Desvribe) CEQA -Wilson Il PlR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardinn Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (bonaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardinn General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson Il Elementary (UR5 2005) *Attachments: ?NONE ©Location Map OSketch Map ©Continuatinn Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record ClArchaeaingical Record ©District Record ?Linear Feature Record ©Milling Station Record ?Rock Art Record ©Artifact Record DPhotograph Record ©Other (t_ist): DPR 523A {il95) *Required information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRl# BU6L~ENG, STRLJGT~iR.~, AfdD ®~JE~T REC®R® Page 2 of 3 ~NRHP Status Gale fiU ~Resaurce Name ar # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 14 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 14 B2. Common Name: 2525 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling X65. Architectural Style: Eclectic Period Revival Cottage x`66. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Qriginal construction 1937. Numerous modifications and additions (n.d.) (source: visual inspection) x`87. Moved? ~1No ?Yes ©Unknawn Date: Origina! Location: "88. Related Features: The property is also developed with cone-car garage. 89a. Architect: Unknawn. 89b. Builder: Unknown *810. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA (1]iscuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005} Regional Culture {?9i7'-1945j. As described within the adnp#ed municipal document, "this period is characterized by the es#ablishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block an W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Stare both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took an ttte prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new canstruc#ian slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, same with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Departmen# of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and f=ire Hall on Street, built around 1933. A# the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Gonfinuation 5heef. 611. Additional Resource Aftributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.} *612. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson} Tract vti~satuit ~~eM~ r~r°~r sc~ooi sirs Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element Gity of San Bernardino PROa~~xnroWN~rtsHlpr,~ap General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura °-- -- ' h '~ ° ~ p Research Associates). !, _ ., ,Mr~mtn ~ P ° ! " ~ I ~ ° ~ to :r n fi C3 ~ 813. Remarks: ~ ~......_'° !s n " r3 ~ ° p Ea x ~ ° 5 This resource is located within the ro osed devela ment area for the ° "~"°'" -~ o°'" `""`R ~'" Wilson ll Elementary School Project~a d is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ~~p ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ ~ n 2,ri~ , u~..,~s~.. ri, ' ~ 7 ~' p!a a O i& a 1314. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AlGP p ~t ~ N , ~,.~~ ~ `Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ -°-•. vne~~,:a,K .-., . aru+. ~ ,,.pus ...,.....rcakn " E (This space reserved for off€cial comments.) ~6l~ p~° ~ rw a fi W~ & ~ t Gw @ 9 ~ x ~ ~ u C Os C~ O C°' ~ O` t . a! a° ae n ae as as ~ n err ro I , I ~ --- Vwcmyllw.A 5'.glo fnmerf~"n.w IbFR1 ~ onMnr Oety:ka....... N.sv~rW L¢a:01 ~R koMaI _ Yaczr!_. State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT 01= PARKS AND RI=CREAT[ON HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 "Resource Name or # 2525 N. Berkley Avenue, San 8ernardino/ Bonita Gardens, Lot 1~l ~Recnrded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *Date: 1115107 l Continuation ©Update Context cant. "'Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant fn San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,444 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War fl, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued tv serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and #ruck routes. Route 68 was built through the city following the completion a# fihe highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1537. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and dawn Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-95 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. "` Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved an May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 934 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 954 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (Int 32}, and it fs assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6}, followed by lot 34 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 71 homes, located primarily Inng 25`h Street Three additional Names were constructed in 7928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, print to Black Tuesday --and the stark of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 7937 (lots 13, 14, 95 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19}, and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with tots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lam were in-filled in the early 1950x: Intl 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and tot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in mare massive, box-like designs. Nistarrc Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations far the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as weft as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay done and Cite North San Bernardino Overlay zones were tv the south and east of #his property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be pntentfally eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "entbndies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". Although this building was constructed in 1937, as part of the 2"~ phase of the original tract design, it fails to have adequate historical integrity required to be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523E (tl95) "Requ'€rec€ information State of California-----The Resources Agency Primary ~ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CD Otli~er Listings Review Gade ftsviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 13 P1. Other Identifier: 2535 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Not for Publication ®Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and {P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) ***b. l7SGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/q SE of ~/4 SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2535 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. l1TM: Zane: 10 ; mEl mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Lonational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, eievation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0'148-173-13-0-000 *P3a. Descriptlan: (Describe resource and its major elements- Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single family residential dwelling originally construnted in 1937. The building is a single-story stucco-clad, wood-framed structure, roughly, "F"-shaped in plan, and with a complex roof. Stylistically, it is an Eclectic Period Revival Cottage with Spanish Colonial massing. The forward most wing is defined by a paired four-over-four double-hung window. Recessed frnm this forward plans is a simple wing containing a small porthole window, followed by a small stoop supported by a latticed wrought iron post. The rear wing contains another paired window, as in the first wing. This dwelling measures 1,121 square feet in area; and sits nn a 0.1492-acre parnel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: QBuilding ©Structure ©Qbject ©Site ©District QElement of D'€strict ©Other (Isolates, eta) P5a Photo ar Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) PSb. Descrlptian of Photo: (View, date, accession #) ,~ - ~ View of the southwest nnrner of the building; taken 1012312007; digital. ~i 4 *P6. Date GonstructedlAge end ~ ~ ~ ,~. Sources: LHistoric ? his oric ?Both Pre t ' ~ ~ 1937 (l1RS: 2005 DataQuick} ~ S~. ~ ~7 e `s ~': ,wA~ *P?. Owner and Address: '' ~~~~~' ~ ~ Michael Haines ~'r ' j r - k , `~°"~ 2535 N. Berkley Avenue ~, ,, ~, ~,~ ~ , ~ 5an Bernardino, CA 92405 ~ ~ ~ PN~`r4. ,S' ~ ,~ -^V~ *P8. Recorded by: (Name, ~ ~,~ ,~ ~ ~ affiliation, and address) "~ ~ ' , ,~"~~ ~ Y f , Andrea tJrbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ ti}t~r: r ~ ~,; r^~'^'J~ ~~~~tua-~-Y`~r»n~ ~/,~ ~ Klejnfelder '%~,, ~ ~ :~'~-~"~~'~~,~~ ~ ~ ~ 1224 Research Dr., Ste B Redlands, CA 92374 *P9. Date Recorded: November 5, 2007 "P10» Survey Type: (Rescribe) CEQA-Wilson Il E=1R "P11. Report Citation: {Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2006), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson II Elementary (tJRS 2005} *Attachments: ©NONE ?Location Map ©Sketch Map OContinuation Sheet I~Building, Structure, and Object Renard ?Archaeoingical Reeord ©Distrint Renard ©Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Reeord ?Rock Art Record ?Artifact Reeord ©Phatograph Record ©Other (List): DpR 523A (1195} 'Required information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BIUILI]INC~ ~TRU~`TIJRE, AN® ~~JE~T RE~~R® Page 2 of 3 '~NRHP Status Code 3CD ~`ResnurCe Name nr # (Assigned by recorder) Bnnita Gardens, Lnt 13 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 13 B2. Gammon Name: 2535 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Qriginal Use:, Residential Dwelling B4. Present t)se: Residential Dwelling ~B6. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival Cottage Style *BS. Coristructiarr History: (Gonstruction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 17riginal construction 1937; chain [ink fence (1119!1956); re-roofing (1013111961). {Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department}. '"B7. IVloved? L?INo IDYes ©Unkrtawn Date: Origirtall~ocatiort: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with aone-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown, B9b. Builder: Unknown ~B1D. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1921-1944 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR3/NRc (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the Gity of San Bernardino General Plan (2005) ReginnaE Culture {1977-X945}. As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and culture[ terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,040 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the I-teritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1926 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. ©ther public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, bath built around 1936 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and %ire Hall on 1~ Street, built around 1933. A# the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Cortfinuafian Sheef B71. Additional Resource Attributes'. (List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) sa3v s3:3xu~:r~3wo ciTY usn * wIL801~f If ELElAENTRRY SCi100L 837E 872. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract n~naEF'tTYawn~~RSf~ignna~ Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino ~ _ _ _ , General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ "; -;- ,. Research Associates}. ~ -~ - ~ ~°' 1wa r,; sa rr n '~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ c, 6 N 513. Remarks: u~~~~~ This resource is located within the proposed development area for the f „~~d xa ~ n c, ~ ~ a ,,,,,„~ fo ~ ~W~.n ~ Wilson ll Elementa School ProF'ect; and is bein evaluated {pursuant to x'° ..3a CEQA. ..3 ,>n.,w.,, _ .,:,,,~ _F..,,..... *B74. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ p ~ La *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ t° ~ °,r`.°° ' .t°? ~, r;' ORn. inc.. .,, O ~ ~ Q to tt ~ ° ~ ~ a rd e Q N I (This Space reserved fnf official Comments.} ~ " eai~. "'~ . p0' a ay . 9~ ~ ~ r~" u e. ~ 6 -. ~ ~i~ ~ : ~ C~ v C ©6 C`0 C" ~ i. so ao ae ar a° as as ar ar ao ! 3 Vxtant loot &SrcJa camly ROS+Omx Q0.) ~4 OxnnrOwpkd. Aeacum: LOCMOn ~ i~6nla4.. Vy VawN State of California -The Resaurces Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANb RECREATION HRl# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 2535 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardina/ Bonita Gardens, Lot 9 3 `Recorded by: Andrda Urbas, M.Arch., AICP "f~afe: '11151()7 ~ Continuation ©Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. sy the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad» However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base an the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. in San Bernardino the route roughly traveled aver the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Pafential property Types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved an May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The Lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (Int 6), followed by lot 3Q in 1925, and Int 18 in 1926. The primary construction tank place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily Inng 25~h Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 {lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10j in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of to#s 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (tats 13, 14, 15 and 25j, two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19j, and one in 1941 (lot 12j. Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950s, lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1$50 and Int 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylisfiic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducfied a citywide recnnnaissanee survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the ldentificafiian of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant nr a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (cj, as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Griterion #3, as it "erribadies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1937, as part of the original tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. DAR 623E {9195 "Required information State of California-The Resaurces Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND REGREATION HRi ~ ~~I~~~~ Trinomial NRHP Status Gode 3CD Other Listings Review Gade Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 20 P1. Other Identifier: 2548 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ? Not for Publication Q Unrestricted *a. Gounty: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc ar P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) **b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date. T.9 N; R.4W ; '/o SE of '/4 SE of Sec.2$; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2548 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zane: 10 ; mEl mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Lncational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parse[ # 0149-'17t-05-0-000 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and ifs major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single-story "L"-shaped Period Revival cottage, with crass-gabled roof. The projecting front gable of this stucco-clad dwelling is defined by a small rectangular, louvered window, centered above an aluminum slider window. A porch within the "L" is supported by a pilaster with a chamfered capital, and housing another aluminum slider window. In area, this dwelling measures 996 square feet, and sits on a parcel measuring approximately 0.1722-acres. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resauraes Present: [Building ?Structure ?Object ?Site ?District ©Element of District ?Other (Isolates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawing (Phnto required for buildings, structures, and nbsects.) P5h• Description of Phot[?: {Uew, date, accession #) ~' View of the southeast corner of the ~' V~~~i building; taken 1012312007; digital. ~~-14r~ ~~.~"~: *P6. Date GanstructedlAgeond Sources: QHistoric ?I'rehistoric ?Both 1927 {URS: 2005 DataQuick) -~ *P7. Owner and Address: '~ f~ r~r r ` ' 4 '`~~~~ a i t ,~ -~~~~ r . Franciso and Gloria Jaeobo ~ a : ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~, 2548 N. Berkley Avenue '. z ~ ~ '.'' San Bernardino, CA 92405 7 ~ #..~- 614 ~ ~,~ *P8. Recorded by: {Name, affiliation, and address) f Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ,. Kleinfelder ~~~,,~~~ ~ ~ ;~, ~ - 122(3 Research Dr., Ste B '`~.~.~ ti ~~~~.~y ~- ' K~'Gy,~~~~ '~ Redlands CA 92374 ~ ~ ,,~~~-~ ~ ~ *P9. Date Recorded: ' _ ~ ~ ~`~~"~`'y~ ~ ~ ~~~~,$ ~z 7 ~,~~,~ ~ November 6, 2007 '~ ~ T~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ,~" *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) ' ,~~`~~~~'~, ~ CE A -Wilson li EIR Q ~ ~r~. *P14. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none."} San Bernardine Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson t993}Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (5an Buenaventura Researctr Associates 2005); DMND Uvilson ll Elementary (URS 2005) (This space reserved for official comments-) *Attachments: ©NONIr ©Location Map ©Sketch Map QContinuation Sheet C~7Building, Structure, and Object Record ?Archaeological Record ?District Record ©Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ?Roek Art Record ©Artifaet Record ©Photograph Record ? Other (List): DPR 523A (1135j *Required information State of California---The Resnurees Agency Primary # E]E?PARTME?NT OF PARKS ANR RECRI=ATION HRI# ~~IL®I~IG, ~TRU~T"tJR~, ANA ®~J~CT° REC®1~® Page 2 of 3 *FIRHP Status Code 3CD 'Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 2D B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 2D B2. Common Narne: 2548 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residenfial Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Eclectic Period Revival Cottage *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Original construction in 1927. Re-roofing {112011959). (source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). Window replacement {n.d.) (source: visual inspection) *67. Moved? C~JIVo ©Yes ?Unknown C3ate: Original Location: '~88. Related Features: The property is also developed with aone-ear garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *B1D. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR3/NRc (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2DD5) Regional Culture (9917-7945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 192D and 1934 the population grew Pram 18,000 to 50,OD0. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many ofi these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 9927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asisfencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, bath built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." {San Buenaventura, 2D05). See: Continuation Sheet. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes} HP2 {Sketch Map with north arrow required.) SAN BERNARC71N0 CITY USE] *B12. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson} Tract '"'~ P~o~ae~Erv~ wNERS~ P MOP,PSfTE Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino ~ General Plan 20D5 , and A { ( ) ppx 13 Historic Context San Buenaventura ~ x Y6ta r- r ~ Research Associates). ~ ~ m B13. Remarks: ~ a~,,.4~'~, f. ~ t~ a @ ~o r cd7.,~~ This resource is located within the proposed development area for the ` ~ =a n = ` t ~ : o F~ a n ~,o K,<.,~ .yv~:.:,:._ ° Wilson ll Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to x p Pa ea p ° t ~ ° ~ ,: < ~ ° ~ CEQA. rt ~,,, Fes,. F 2~ ° . V -! *B14. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP i ~ . °_~n~,~ ~ ~' *Date of E=valuation; November 5 2007 = " ° ~ Al CZ a ~ r e ~ r n2 ~, ca..i~m._. °x,a.. r <r - ~y i ee„ vA!rc..N94md GA h~ Earn. ~ ~ _ ..r. d~ ~,~ ~ ;-'~ ~ ~ - V A ~ u -! ~ •F so u ae p a° ae as a, as ar ao 1~~ . VxcaM LaM 5.~QeiemYYReaanwc t5FR7 ~d wA~yd. /~ xssou.cc Law~b.. ~ w~ r... j~Fj~ v,ua State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT 01= PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 "Resource Name ar # 2548 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino/ Bonita Gardens, I_ot 2D "Retarded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICp *C7ate: 1115/(}7 ~ Continuation ~ Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quaker of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa a Railraad» However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Nartan Air Farce Base an the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardinn the route roughly traveled aver the Cajon pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Rou#e 66 has been replaced by the A-15 in San Bernardino. pntenfiiai properly types wifihin fihis context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways mnv're theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The cots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 {Int 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home» The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took plane during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily Inng 25th Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 {lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 1fl) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 {lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 {lots 7 and 11}, and three in 1939 {fats 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot a0 in 1953, These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs» Historic Srgni#cance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identifcatinn of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Anne and the North San Bernardinn Overlay zones were to the soufih and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 5fl years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to Caiifnrnia Register Crifierfan #3, as it "errtbadies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period,..". This building was constructed in 1927, as part of the original tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523E (1195) "Required in#grmation State of California--The Resources Agency Primary # Df`PARTMENT 01= PARICB AND R~CRIA'C10N HRI # ~~I~e~~~ Trinomial: NRHP Status Code 3CD Other Listings Review Cade Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 ~Resnurce Name ar #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 12 P1. Other Identifier: 2555 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Not for Publication ©Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) **b. E1SGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.'iN; R.4W ; '/a SE of '/a SE of SeC.2$; -San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2555 N. Barkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN (G.P.S.} e. Other Locatianal Dafa: {e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, eta, as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-173-14-4-040 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This building is a single-story wand-framed, "L" {"E"-)-shaped cottage with cross-gabled roof, and Classical Revival features. The projecting front gable is defined by a rectangular, louvered window, cenfered above athree-part picture window (15-light fixed sash flanked by four-over-four double-hung windows}. The primary entrance is located beneath a parch within the "L", with another fnur- over-four double-hung window located to its right. The porch is supported by a single wood past. To the righf of the doorway is a small addition. In area, this dwelling measures approximately 1,052 square feet; and sits nn a 0.1492-acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: C~Building ©Structura ©Object ©Site ?District CElement of District ©Other (Isolates, etc_) P5a Photo or Drawin Photo re aired for buildings structures and objyects P5b. Description of Photo: (View, ~ ~- ~~~~,~ - , ~;~~,;~ date, accession #) i~~ ~~.,~_ t ~ ~ m~ View of fhe southeast corner of the ~ ~ ~' ~ ~'~ building; taken 10!2312007; digital. .~~,~ ''~ ~~~b ': d~k ; *P6. Date ConstructedlAge and ,~~" '~ ~4r ti~ '~, Sources: ll-iistoric t, µ ~ ?Prehistoric OBoth ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ 1941 (tJRS: 2005 DataQuick} ~"~ ~ ~'` *P7. Owner and Address: ~' w ~°~'~~ ~ ~ "" ~ r,~~~ '~~` ~ '~~ ~ Miguel Castro and Maria Cortez t ~~' ~ 2555 N. Berkley Avenue i ~, ,~_ ~'~-' ~~' 9~4 ~ ,~~ San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~' ~ ~ ,~ y ~' . ~ ~~`" ~ ,~ x~ ~r~ Fps ~' ~^" `', :- -~, ~ ~ ~, `, - P8. Recorded by: (Dame, ~--~ ~ affiliation, and address) '~` ~ ~ °' Andrea tJrbas, M.Arch., A1CP ,'` ~ r ~ ~ Kleirifelder ~ ~- 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,a,,~~~, h ~, Redlands, CA 92374 ,~~ ~, ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ P9. Date Recorded: ,~ ~ ~ ~~..~~~~~.~s~~~~ - p ~.- November 5, 2007 .r ~ s , a~zYa r~ ~^., '. h, r ,~"" ~ r M _ y h~ ~x~ a" ~ r a,', e3 ,~. ~' -?~„~-~~d~ ~ W ~ ~ ~~'~~~~~~°~ ~ ,, *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) ~z ~ CEQA Wilson II ElR *P71. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element Cify of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson 11 Elementary (1185 2005) '`Attachments: ?NONE ?Lncatinn Map ?Sketch Map QCantinuatian Sheet QBuilding, Structure, and Objacf Record ?Archaeological Retard ©Cistrict Record OL.inear Feature Record ©MII1ing Station Record ©Rock Art Record ?Artifact Record ©Phatograph Record D Other (List): DPR 523A ('1!95) 'Required information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRl# ~IJ~LDdNC~, ~'TRl1CT'IJFiE, AM® ®~JE~T' RE~OR® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Cade 3CD `Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 12 81. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 12 82. Camman Name: 2555 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling 134. Present Use, Residential Dwelling ~`B5. Architectural Style: Classical Revival Cottage ~`B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Original construction 1941; Re-roofed and misc. alterations {9!1211997}, (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *B7. Moved? l?fNo ©Yes ?Unknown Date: Original Location: ~`B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with a tw0-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. 89b. Builder: Unknown *B1U. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR31NRc (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005} Regional Culfure (1977-7945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some eases older Buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well, In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took nn the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration {WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 an Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Culture! Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." {San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuation Sheet. B99. Additional Resource Attributes: {List attributes and codes) HP2 {Sketch Map with north arrow required.} SAN BERNARD€NO CITY USD ~B7r~. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson} Tract wk~'SPROIPl:RTY OwNERSir11P MO p3kTE Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino _ , - _ . General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ~,~ -r- ~ -~ r a Research AS50CIateS}. o~V~..z~ a c: ° w~- 0 "® io Eris M^k ~ . B18. Remarks. ~j vn,~r h~~a„ rNV.~, -„~1~., This resource is located within the proposed development area for the f ~ P8 !a i3 ~ ~ ~ rr 3 r7 Wilson ll Elementa School Pro'ect; and is 6ein evaluated ursuant to _ x ~ ~e Ro t~r~~° ~~~r= , ~ ~ F IY ! g p I " ~ ~ is ° ~ c7 ~' CEQA. ~,.~~~ r ° FJ ra a ~~„~,~ ~ ' O ~ ' ~ _'. _ ~ r ~ fl B74. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP w _~.,_,_ .,.. kDate of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 x " r~ Ro r:! n " "```yyyyy~~{{{~ ° ~ 1e ' ~ ° >c~ 3 yn..na__,.,,,: irk is R3 exww.~~ore. ieu nw ~.1 ``'p1FF o n ', „ ° O so rx O ° ~ . ~ Ora e O ~u~ peek ~, ~- t s~...F,b R,.. {This space reserved for nfticial comments.} ° p a ~ ocii~ u ~ K k o ~ ° ~ a ~ ° w ~ a t ° I. +r ~a eo as sr as ae xc sr sr ar an 1. ~ ! 6 : Vncwil Lure uiigo famrrRadanwc (9Fa! ~ o- n°° ~a.`~kb _ w.io~,ree eammn ~ iteeaen _ Yamro State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # ?EPARTMENT OF PARKS ANF7 RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name ar # 2555 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino/ Bonita Gardens, Lot 12 'Recorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *C?ate: 11151Q7 Continuation ~ Update Canfext cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 194D. By the 194gs, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,OD0 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War ll, the development and expansion of Norton Air Farce Base on the grounds aF the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 2Dth century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city fallowing the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Mnnica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potenfial property Types within This context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manuFacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and 'Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 182x, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927", with the completian of 11 homes, located primarily long 25~h Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), faun in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19), and nne in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not cnmmenee again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with fats 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in filled in the early 7950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type; period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1941, as part of the third phase of the tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. qf'R 523E (7195) "Required information State of California-----The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION WRI # ~~~M~~~ Trinomial NRWP Status Cade 3CD Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name ar #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 19 P1. Other Identifier: 25Fi0 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Not for Publication Cat Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location iUlap as necessary.) **b. tJSGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date. T.1N, R.4W ; '/a SE of '/a SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2560 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zane: 1©; mEl mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locatianal Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # g1~49-171-OA~-p-OQO *P3a. Description: (<'~eseribe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single family residential dwelling originally constructed in '1939. The building is a single-story wood-framed structure, "U"- shaped in plan, and totaling approximately 1,535 square feet; which sits on a parcel totaling approximately 0.`1722-acres. It is a stucco-clad Eclectic cottage, with a double cross-gabled roof, flanking a central portico. Small rectilinear louvered vents are Incated beneath each gable; the gable wing to the left incorporates a large bay with three multi-light windows; while the right wing incorporates a much smaller multi-light aluminum slider window. The central porch covers a security door, followed by another multi-l"igh# aluminum slider window. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: QBuilding ©Structure ©Object ©Site ©District EEeement of District ©Other (Isolates, eta} PSa. Phofo or Drawin Photo requsred for buildings, structures, and objects.} P5b. Description of Photo: (View, ; . ~~,~ ,~ ~ ~ date, accession #) -ys fi`-. View of the east side of the ~~'- 3 iii s~~~~- building; taken 1012312007; digital. i 1,' ~ • t'~'` ,~ *P6. Date ConstructedlAgeond f ~ Sources: QHistoric `~- i ?Prehis#oric ©Both y ' 1939 (URS: 2005 DataQuick) 4 *P7". Owner and Address: ' l ~~,~ ~•'` ~ ~~•;,,: Alfonso and Michelle Parra ~, - 2560 N. Berkley Avenue ;j ' ~ t°°~ San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~ ~z ~ ~`~"~~ *P8. Recorded by: (I~Iame, ', s4, is arfiliation, and address) i ' ~ 6~~~~~~ ~ , ~, ~ Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP y ~ ~ ~,~ Kleinfelder "`~ :~- 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ~ ~" ,~~ , f ~ ,,~~ ~,~~.~ ,~~~~.~~ 4 k Redlands, CA 92374 '~~ .' ~ *P9. Date Recorded: ~a r~,;~~,t~,~F~~~~'~"' ` ~ ,, -~` ^;'y~"~:~.^ '"`~ November 5, 2007 ,;,, ., _ , . _ _ ,., *P1(f, Survey Type: {Describe) ~ . F~_`...:.~zu ~:~s: '• ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ..,~., Y _ CEQA Wilson 11 EIR ~`P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "Wane.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bemardina General Plan {2005), and Appx 13 Historic Contex# {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson Il Elementary (URS 2005} *Attachments: ©NONE ©Location Map ©Sketch Map C~1Continuation Sheet LjBuilding, Structure, and Object Record I~Archaeological Record ©Dis#rict Record ?Linear Feature Record ©Milling Sta#ion Record ©Rock Art Record ©Artifact Record ClPhotograph Record ? Other (List): DPR 523A (1195) *Requireci information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OP PARKS ANCJ RECREATION HRI# ~U1L®INC~, STRUCTURE, AN® ~~JECT REC®R® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Gode 3CD *Resource Name or # {Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 19 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 19 B2. Common Name: 2560 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *BS. Architectural Style: Eclectic Period Revival Cottage *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of a4terations) Original construction 1939. Aluminum patio cover (5!1511988}. {Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *B7. Moved? QNo ?Yes ?Unknovrn Date: Original Location: *B6. Related Fee#ures: The property is also developed with a one-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. 139b. Builder: Unknown ~'E319. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San 8ernardinv, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR31NRc {Discuss impor#ance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic serape, Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the Gity of San Bernardino General Plan (2005) Regional Gulture (1917-1945}. As described within the adapted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000, The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. in same cases alder buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Gourt Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Stare bath built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new build'€ngs took an the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asisteneia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 an Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hats! burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005). Sae: Contfnuafion Sfteef. 871. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *872. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract sANe@RNAROINQCITYU6© rfJiL50fi€11 ELEl~SEiNTAiiY aCHOOL SITE Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino rRarerzrva~nN~RSt+l~r>nAP General Plan {2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates}, ~ a ~,~ -- ~ 813. Remarks: l ~ o ~ en rr ~, h ~ ~ ~ t n ~ I ^ awN aa+t.+..eiwib ]l pe ............XG~.+ G [?J 84 E9 l>7 q R rya !O P l•J ° This resource is located within the proposed development area for the - o....~,~~.~ a -~ Wilson ll Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ;~,~ a ¢s '~ n ° ~ ~ ~ ~' ' n ° CE{~A. x p ee ea O ~ ° ~ a Fa 4 ~ vc~.M„ ,r~.w., a.s.c~gxcw. r ,rx ~ , i © M .!Gk? ra, 7 ~ o+m^~ F4 a pxn 814. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch,, AICP "Da#e of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~r ° ~ ° ~, e- s ~ za z~ n & c~,,~.a T ~ '~' ~ 1 ~ --¢6Fk This s ace reserved for official comments.) "' ~' ~" d u ~ Q8 C~ ~ ~n '@i' Q • '[ ~i+. aF en as xe m ze ae as s~ u ai as l I F rp~ vacym W~__ Sn9oFamrracxanoaaFrey aoxna: pentuce uuwcctoaxn ~ riertw_ ., V ~V SJidM State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPAR7'M1=NT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 Resource Name or # 2560 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino) Bonita Gardens, Lo# 19 '"Recorded by: Andraa Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *l]a#e: 1')15107 Continuation D Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War 11, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base nn the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and trunk routes. Route 68 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types twithin Phis context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Perlnd Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 13O x 50 feet, and the dwellings, cnnstructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and nne bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (Int 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25}~' Street Three additional homes were cnnstructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 89}, and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. development of the tract started again in 1981, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 {lots 3, 4, and 21}, four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 1S and 25), two in 1938 {lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19}, and nne in 1941 (lot 12). Development hatted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 {lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in ~Iled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 4fl in 1853. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant ar a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion ~f3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1939, as part of the third phase of the tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523E (1195) "Required information State of California -~-•- The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT O®®F PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ~i~~lY[9"yl'~~ f~~~®~~ Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CD Other listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Flame or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 11 P1. Other Identifier: 2561 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. l"acatlon: ? Not for Publication d Unrestricted *a. Caunty: San Bernardino Caunty and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) "`*b. USGS 7.5" Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1IV; R.4W ; '/a SE of '/a SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2561 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. t)TM: Zone: 10 ; ml mN (G.P.S.} e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcei #, directions to resource, efevatian, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Farce[ # 0149-173-15-(}-000 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) TI1is is a single family residential dwelling originally constructed in 1938. The building is a single-story wood-framed structure, "U"- shaped in plan, and totaling approximately 1,387 square feet; which sits an a parcel totaling approximately 0.1492-acres. It is a stucco-clad Classical Revival Cottage, with a double cross-gabled roof, flanking a central portico, Small rectilinear louvered vents are located beneath each gable; and surmounting bay windows (central fixed sash, flanked by one-over-one double-hung units) The central porch provides coverage for the primary entrance door, flanked by one-over-one double-hung sash. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: OBuilding ?Structure ?Object ?Site ?District C~Element of District ?Qther (lsclates, eta) P5a. Photo or Drawin Photo re aired far buildin s, structures, and ab'ects.) P5b. Caescrlptlon of Photo: (View, M ~ ~ date, accession #) Yak ,. ~ ~5a `' r ; ` ; ~ View of the southwest corner of the ~~;.- 4~, .~~, building; taken 10123/2007; digital. ''«f ~ *P6. Date CanstructedlAgecnd ,'~~ ~' . ~ ~ ~'' Sources: C~Histnria ` '~ ?Prehistoric ©Both ~ ~, 5~ ~, 1938 (URS: 2005 DataQuick) $ ~z ti ~ i ~ F c ' *P7. OWner and Address: • ~"~ Fidennio and Virginia Macias 'r ~ ~' ,: ~ s, . ~ 2561 N. Berkley Avenue ~'` San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~ , '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ <; 3u p ~ ~ *P8. Recorded by: (Name, ~ s ~ ~1s 4'h >,~, ~~"~ q ~'" afFillatlon, and address) ~'"'~ n~~~~ ?~-. ~ ~=,~1 AndrBa Urbas M.Arch., RICP il~ 113~~!?~:9'f1 "< 1 3 z~lld4sl~ , II t11~ `1v ~ a ~ ,' Q ~~~~~~,u ~'F! ° > Klelnfelder ~~'lill~ ~ , ~x 1220 Research Dr., Ste B 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ Redlands, CA 92374 ~' ~., ,,~ .,~k y ~ .$Y' ~^"%~:x. r > F'. ~z C ~iX kr ~ ,rs "~ ~ac'~~ r ,-,'s~+~ '~`Pg. ate R@COrded: '_ ~ ~., 5 aa,~,f~~' ~, =`" November 5, 2007 ~ ~;~"~' ,~ ~ ~ '' °'" ~P10. Survey Type: (pescribe) .~=~x,~s ~ s ~ CEQA-Wilson Il ElR j tif~".:fr`~`~ . °^, F~N~.'~'~,....- ._.,.:. ti^ ~ :,,»,d~C.:.~m'~u.~`".~~.~:~~.c:.. .t'?,.;~r~, ~~" tom'." ' *P11. Report Citation: {Cite survey report and other sources, or er:ter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991} Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson ll Elementary (UR5 2005} *Attachments: ?NONE ©Loca#ion Map ?Sketch Map dContinuation Sheet QBuilding, Structure, and Object Record ?Archaealogica€ Record ?I]istrict Record ?Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ?Raak Art Record ?Artifact Renord ©Phatograph Record ? Other (List): I]PR 523A (1495) "Required information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF P~A°R}CS /A'~~IDpRyE~yCREAgqTION //ma+"y" ® gH+Rf# Page 2 of 3 ~`NRHP Status Code 3CD *Resnurce Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 11 B1. t-listaric Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 11 B2. Common Name: 2561 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling 64. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *BS. Architectural Style: Classical Revival Cottage *66. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations> and date of alterations} Origins! construction 1938, Aluminum patio cover (1018/1969). (Source: City of San Bernardina Building Services Department). X87. Moved? QNo CIYes ©Unknown Date: Original Location: ~`B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. t39b. Builder: Unknown *61t). Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR31NRc (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardina General Plan (2005) Regional Culture {1977-1945}, As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 60,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In same cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled ar replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Stare both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardina College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 193fls new construction slowed. However, several public buildings ware constructed at this time, same with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA} funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardina Nigh Schaal and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, bath built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time, In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 20fl5}. See: Confinuafian Sheef. 611. Additional Resource Attributes: {List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *612. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson} Tract 5RN BERhiARDINO CITY U50 '3JIL50N €1 ELERgEIVTARY SCHaOL SITE Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardina r7rzn+~Erowla~RSr~ial~rAP General Plan (2006), and Appx 13 hlistaric Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates}. ~ ; zsra `T- sr~r ~ ~ ° „, za 77 ° 6 R B13. Remarks: y~ "" _ '~ e 9 This resource is located within the proposed development area for the a a°.,.4~m&~ ie ~ -G A ~ ar ~ la $ nn ~.y Wilson ll 1=lementary Schaal Project, and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ~ ~A " ~ a ~ ~ ~ " ' u~? R t CEQA. ~ ~ °G ~p ze r• O ° ~ ~ ° ., <q Is s ~ ~ ~a A ~ ~,~~® La a a ~ *614. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ 3 E_ ` t ° ~ M ~ r4 • ~ i? L. *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ o~~ ° . i ~s- ' ~ ° ~ ~y~y{{{{ ~ Is r t7 ,"3 ~ioi Y• EI [y R r{~R Lr.e....~ax F~, ,r nxm•w.. na ~ ' ° p ' ~ o Q -a• ee C7 ~ . ~ ~ 1• • q ~, ~on~. 86f~k ,tax csr w,..,~ L.1r rt Ln., t~ a:- I (This space reserved far official comments.) ~ ° ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ° ~ a ~ o j w ~ ° , -i t. ~ ?i t• !a a8 n d• Ba as a3 A ar a• 'f 1 3 1 ds veca,lFarn Sngc~ rYRmNnL°rr4FAl ,u, axno+ArdpF41,__._.._ /] Finm~tctrcNbn R IErsrWd ~ ff/~\ V~~ State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # L7EPARTMENT OP PARKS ANI] RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resaurce Name ar # 256'[ N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino/ Bonita Gardens, l_ot 11 Recorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICF' "Date: 1115107 ~ Continuation ? Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War Il, the development and expansion of Morton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's Leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transpartatian center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to l=lfth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-75 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial 8< manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved nn May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25`x' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one blot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Repression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (fat 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950x: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and Int 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did not ann#inue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Signitlcanee and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was oat identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California h'egister Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1938, as part of the third phase of tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor, QAR 5231. (9195} ~f~equirec! information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND REGREATION HRI # P~~~AR~ Trinomial NRHP Status Cade 3Cb other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 "Resource Name or #: Bantia Gardens, Lot 18 P1. Other Identifier: 2572 N. Berkley Avenue *P2. Location: D Not for Publication D Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) **b. I1SGS 7.5` Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/4 SE of '/~ 3E of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.NI c. Address: 2572 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zane: 10 ; m1=1 mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational bats: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-171-03_p-OOQ *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a building is a clapboard-clad single-story "L"-shaped ,stucco-clad, wand-frame cottage with cross-gabled roof, and Tudor Revival features. The projecting front gable is defined by a small rectilinear louvered venfilation window, cantered above athree- part picture window (two smaller side windows flanking a central 1B-light fixed sash). The gable is extended to the right, incorpnra#ing an rectilinear opening with clipped comers leading to the front entryway. The main dnrr is protected by a security door and flanked by two sidelights. Another three-part picture window (two eight-light side windows flanking a central 16-light fixed sash) is located within the recessed "L". It measures 946 square feet in area, and si#s on a parcel totaling approximately 0.1722-acres. This building retains eonsiderable~historic integrity. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: OBuilding ?Structure ©Object ?Site ©bistrict C1Element of bistrict ©Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo or Drawing {Photo required for buildings, structures, and ob'ects. P6b• Description of Photo: (view, date, accession #) View of the southeast corner of the '~' ~ ~' •' ~ y ~ building; taken 1012312007; digital. r *P6. Date ConstructedlAge and ~ i~* ~ ,~~ ~ Sources: ©Historic ©Prehistoric ©Both ~ n 1926 (URS: 2005 DataQuick) ~ ~ it ,~ ,JJ, '~~ *P7. Owner and Address: C ~ ~ 1 ~ } fe ~ Carol Story (trust} .,~'' -~ ~ 481 N. Central Avenue, Unit A Upland, CA 91786 x r~ ~ h+~ i7 ~~~•7~~ 7~ ,~~'~ *P8. Recorded by: (Name, y ~ affiliation, and address) s ""' `~'`: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~,:." Kleinfelder 1220 Research Dr., Ste B Redlands, CA 92374 ;,~~`~ ~ *P9. Date Recorded: f November 5, 2007 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe} CEQA-Wilson ll EIR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.°} San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (bonaldson 1991} Tract Map; Data G2uick; Historic Preservation Elament City of San Bernardino General Plan (2(305}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMNb Wilson 19 Elementary (URS 2005) *Attachments: ?NONE ?Location Map ©5ketch Map C~IContinuation Sheet I~Building, 5#ructure, and Object Record ?Arehaeological Record ©bistrict Record ©Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ?Artifact Record ?Photograph Record ©Other {List): DPR 523A (9I9S) "Required Information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARtMBIVT Ot= PARKS Atdi3 RECRI;ATIOtV F1Rl# ~IJIL®I~IC, STRIJ~T!¢)R~, AN® ®~J~~T" REGC)R~ Page 2 of 3 *NRMP Status Code 3CD '"Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lat 18 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 18 B2. Common Name: 2572 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardinor CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling ~`B5. Architectural Style: Cottage Style (eclectic revival -Tudor- Spanish} single-family residential structure. '~B6. Construction History: {Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1926; however, no original building permi#s were mailable for review. Re-sheathed garage with '12 oriented strand beard, re-roofed with composition shingles, installed 15 fight fixtures, two water close#s, a lavatory and a kitchen sink on 1016120DD; rehabbed dwelling with stucco and installed 11 new windows an 212412005. (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department}. *B7. Moved7 l~fUo ?Yes ?LJnknown Date: Original Location: "B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. BSa. Architect: Unknown, B9b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR31NRc (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural can#ext as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005) Regional Culture (1977-794fi). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a wefl- def€ned regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 192D and 193D the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled ar replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Andersen Building and a new Harris Company Department Store bath built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino Coiiege in 1927. During the Depression era of the 193fls new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, same with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration {V11PA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Build'€ng, bath built around 1935 an Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Culture! Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930x, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenmentura, 2fl05) B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) HP2 sAlu setzNalzolNO cr~~ use WILSON A ELEMEi~f'rkRY SCHAQL SITE *B12. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson} Trac# ?ROPl:R"rv(aWNERSHSPtu1AP Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Klement City of San Bernardino ~ i ~Q General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context San Buenaventura g ~"` ~f_ sraarr ~ o ~Y Research ASSgClateS. ~ ~ n r ea rram~ ..nGP ~[~~y v rAnR ~r n i.w,~i.. 84 10 n 4 F9 F ° l^l !O £~_.(7 ~ R tmw,_,,,,.- .me, M1,.~ t313. Remarks: ~ °a..~© ^' ea la ~ ° ~ ~ ° _ p re a .R ~ This resource is located within the proposed development area for the ~ a o E6 Po ~ ..ur ° ~ ~ ° p :P 4 ~ ~" ~!, Wilson 1f 1=fementary School Pro}ect; and is being evacuated pursuant to ---- " ~ , ~ Via p ~A R ~ CEQA. ~ Pr ,lio-lq , °w.<, . ~ ,c *B14. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ ra xg a, ~ r~,>u,a ~~rlp¢.~.~,.°, ',.m~la~.r~ ~`~8- *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ `~p cv xa o ° ~i? ° ®ra a o ° 4bn~w.!lew+?m ...................J ?1' ' H VNn¢fY. btin'R: ....,..... AJOdran ~~snr 2ldfnA ar, w ear. arc ~,.., srr nos a+r t»•-p ~,~ . {This space reserved for official comments.) , o~ga Qo o $k ko ~o ~a ~o Ln ~p ~o w 1 4, so do ae n da ae as ~ as ar ao I i YPCwd LaM 5'ny9 f¢~YYRrcJ$nw (9FR1 ~O:a^or Ocryi-d A ~1/e~ Aesavroe Lau~cn ~R Ifnttp, . t?' Yas¢N State of Galifornia -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT DI= PARKS AND RI=CREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 '"Resource Name ar # 2572 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino) Bonita Gardens, Eat 9 S Recorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AIGP 'Date: '{ 115iQ7 ®Continuation ? Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McC7onalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino In 1940. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base an the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city fallowing the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. 'Today, mast of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial all manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved an May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Gottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Glassical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 95Q square feet in area, and consisted of five roams, Including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (Nat 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1925 (lot 6), followed by Int 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 Names, located primarily long 25th Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10j in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11~, and three in 1939 {lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 {lot 12), Development halted again with the US entry into WW1[, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining late were in Willed in the early 1950x: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed an similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in mare massive, box-like designs. Historic Signifrcance and eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recammendatians for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant ar a contributor to any of these classifications. palms Historic District was proposed #a the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay 2:one and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c}, as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to Caiifamia Register Criterion tt3, as It "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, ar~d period...". This building was constructed in 9926, as part of the original tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a poten#ial contributor. DPR 523E (1155) 'Required information State of Galifarnia -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTiV1ENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION MRI # ~~~~,~~~ ~,~~®~~ Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CD Other Listings Review Cade Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 10 P1. Other Identifier: 2573 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardina *P2. Location: ? Not for Publication ©Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and {P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location lVlap as necessary.} **b. USGS T.5` Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4~W ; '/<5E of '/45E of5ec.28; San Bernardino B.iVI c. Address: 2573 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardina Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone, 10 ; mE/ N {G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data, (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0949-173-96-0-a00 *A3a. Description: {Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single family residential dwelling originally constructed in 1929. The building is a single-story stucco-clad, wand-framed structure, "T"-shaped in plan, with across-gabled roof. The front gable surmounts a rectilinear opening leading into the front porch. A contemporary paneled door with a transom is centered within the porch, and is flanked by contemporary multi-light aluminum slider windows. A red brick chimney is visible at the right side elevation. This dwelling measures approximately 915 square feet in area, and sits on a 0.1492-acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: {List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: QBuilding ?Structure ?Object ©Site ©District !Element of District ?Other (isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo ar Drawin Photo re uired for buildin s, structures, and objects.) PSb. Description of Photo: (View, ~ ~ • r ~ date, accession #) y K ~ ~ , View of the southwest corner of the :~, building; taken 1012312007; digital. ? Y l *P8. Date GonstructedlAge and Sources: C~IHistoric - ~ ?Prehistnric ?Bath ° ' 1929 (t1RS: 2005 DataQuick) ' t ~ -.. ~ ~' *P7. Owner and Address: ~"~~' Eliasar Parra 2573 N. Berkley Avenue ~ ~ ` ~ ~x ' ` ~=•-~- `h'am, t' ,~:' San Bernardino, CA 92405 "` "~ ~ ~4 r~ Viz. ~'~ - ^ ,' Vii/ x ~x r s ' S`~'~` ~'~ ~x ~N~ *P8. Recorded by: (Name, e ~ ~ ~ ~ ak c fq~j~~„~`~'~r~``~ af~iiiatl611, anCt address} ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~~'~~ ~ ~ ~ Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP _ ~a~ „t '~~~'s~r~ ~~~s'~„~~ Kleinfelder ~ a ~ 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ' ~ ~ ~ j Redlands, CA 92374 x ~ ~-~`~~x; °,~`°~ .~~~~g ~`~, ~ P9. Da#e Recorded: ,~~ ~,'~ r, z~~ ""~~~~`'~~'~~~~~~~~~~~ ,~` ~ November 5, 2007 ,~-'l~'~ ~~s~ ~ ~ ~.~~"~,~~~~ ~ ~ ~ *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ s ~ ~ t'-''' ;a ~ ~z ,~ ~ CEQA -Wilson II EIR a1,rti s~ h ° x~y7 ' ~ ~"~ ~zi"~'~" ~' ,yam -., ~ '~ G; ~, - . .~1 i». *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "Wane") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson 1991} Traat Map; Data Quick; l-listaric Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005}; DMND Wilson ll Elementary {URS 2005) *Attachments: ©NONE ?Location Map I~Sketch Map QContinuatian Sheet !Building, Structure, and Object Record ?Archaeological Record ?bistrict Record ?Linear Feature Record ©Milling Station Record ?Rack Art Record ?Artifact Record ©Phatagraph Record ? Other (List}: DPR 623A (1195) *Required information State of Californian-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANI] RECREATION HRI# BUILD6N0, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECOR® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 3CD *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 10 B1. Historic !Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 10 62. Common Name: 2573 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardina, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Eclectic Period Revival Cottage *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations} Original construction 1929. Window replacement and stucco application (8/2911897). (Source: City of San Bernardina Building Services DepartrY~ent). Parch modification (n.d.} {source; visual inspection) *B7. Moved? C~1No ©Yes ©Unknown Date: Original location: *B$. Related Features: The property is also developed with a two-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder; Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1841 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR31Nftc (Discuss i€TSportance in terms of historical ar architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.} This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardina General Plan (2005} Regional Culture (1917-!945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In same cases alder buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block an W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store bath built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well, In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona Schaal in 1925 and San Bernardina College in 1927. During the lOspressian era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at #his #ime, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (VIIPA} funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other publin buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardina Cultural Center and l=ire Ha?l on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Contrnuatinn Sheet. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.} 5AN BERNkRD€NO CITY l3&r7 1N[L3aN II ELEMENTAi2Y SCHQOL SETE *B12. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract PRQPERTYOUYNERS#-]IPhARP Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardina ~s General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura ~ e z~€~ W. sw~r ~,, Research ASSQGEateS}. I ~ a ~ x~ ~a~A~F ~ ®_~o a ~u ~ ~ 1 h B13. Remarks: ~ """ ~'~ Th'ss resource is located within the proposed development area for the ~ ~ ~~%YS ~ xq~ ~ x d ~~" ~ ~L~p Wilson ll Elementary 5choal Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to % ;~~,,„~ ps ~ ~ ~ ~ ,p ° ~ ~!, CEQA. 2J ~ ~v en / FwHm. a, n 'a- 814. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ---- *t]ate of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ A '° 2r r€ ~ ,=o u~ k7r~a ? ~ ~ ~7~~.....: ,~ ~v e C3 as er O ~ ~ ~ ,o s O ~ ,.tin ,y u,~~a ...~cw.., t.- € 4-~^CfFIR as mr .an_.~..~ sar .are an va cu r usr av (This space reserved far off€cial comments.} n ~ a ~ _a ~ a s p ~ ~ ~ R ~ a f ~ ~ R f o ~ ~ 4V G C` O G~ ~ C7` I. a ra ~ : ve ss :a as a+ ~ as a€ so 'I . I € YsceN lsrE S'ii$a FSml'Y A¢~'6:nx (361iV ?p b~.nor 6rtc{~i:+f,. -, Y l /AN¦ 34¢•uRSii[YS+ ~ VWxY1 State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT 01= PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 "Resource Name or # 2573 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino) Bonita Gardens, Lai 10 '"Recorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP '`Date: '1'115107 ~ Continuation ©Update Canfext cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the fiirst McDnnalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Marton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route fib was built through the city fallowing the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Manisa between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled aver the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Fotentia! property types uvithin this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial 8~ manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 192Us. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Cnlanial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 Names, located primarily tang 25`x' Street Three additional Names were constructed in '1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (Int 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great 13epression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots T and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 9, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did oat commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did oat continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations far the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead ©verlay Zane and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c}, as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #i3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1929, as part of the original tract design, and although modified, maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. Dl'R 5231_ (#195) -Required information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ~~~~~~'~' ~~(;®R.® Trinomial NRHP Status Gode 6U Other Listings Review Gode Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bnnita Gardens, Lot 17 P7. Other Identifier: 2584 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Not for Publication Q Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc ar P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) **b. USGS 7'.5` Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R:4W ; '/4 SE of '/4 SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: 2584 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardinn Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zane: 10 : ml~! mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: i~arcel # 0949-171-02-0-OOQ *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. lnc4ude design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This stucco-clad, wood framed Bungalow is "L"-shaped in plan, with afront-gabled roof., of which the gable end is adorned with decorative shingles. The projecting wing (left half of the gable) is defined by a central rectangular double-hung window, while the right half a recessed porch is located within the "L", proving coverage for the main doorway and a large nine-light contemporary aluminum window. this building measures 1,044 square feet, and sits on a 0.1722-acre lat. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (t.ist attribu#es and codes) HP2 *P~4. Resources Present: ©Building ?Structure ©Object ?Site ?District RlElement of bistrict ©Other (isolates, etc.) PSa. Phata or Drawing {Photo required fnr buildings, structures, and ob'ects.~ F'5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) ~~P 1 ~ View of the southeast corner of the buildiing; taken 10123f2007; d'€gital. F;~ =;,r~.~,. '~~. A' i *P5. Date ConstructedlAge and T ~.~~,~ ~ ~~f,yl Sources: IFlistoric °~'~ ©Prehistoric ?Both ~,"~~' ,. '1950 (URS: 2005 DataQuick} ~r ~ ~~- T nd Address: i,;, *P7. Owner a k~ , ?k: San Bernardinn City '~~`: ~ 2584 N. Berkley Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92405 *P8. Recorded by: (Name, "~ .~~d2~ ~ affiliation, and ac€dress) Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ ~ Kleinfelder ~w >- 1220 Research Dr., Ste B - ~ ~ Redlands, CA 92374 ~~,~'~ `=~- *P9. Date Recorded: ' November 5, 2007 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) CEQA -Wilson [I BIR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, ar enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) l"ract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMN1J Wilson ll Elementary (URS 2005) *Attachments: ?NONI= ©Location Map ©Sketch Map 1~JContinuatian Sheet C~7Building, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaeological Record ©District Record ©Linear Feature Record ©Milling Station Record ©Rock Ark Record ©Artifact Record ©Phatograph Record ©Other (1"ist): APR 523A (7195} "Required information State of Caiifornia The Resources Agency Primary # I)I=PARTMENT OF PARI~CS AND RECREATION HRI# ~U1LC3fhlt~, ~TRtlCTIJRE, ~!N® ®~JE~T F~.E~®R~ Page 2 of 3 *I~IRIiP Status Code 6U *Resource Name ar # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Iwot 17 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, t-ot 17 62. Cnmman Name: 2584 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardina, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Fesidential Dwelling *65. Architectural Style: Bungalow *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, a6teratiar~s, and date of alterations) Original construction 195 (source: URS: DataQuick) *B7. Moved? I?INo ?Yes ?Unknown Date: Original L.acatlon: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown, B9b. Builder: Unknown '~B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardina, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope, Also address integrity.) This bolding is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005) Regional Cuffure (9917-1945). As described within the adapted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a welE- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center care to accommodate this growth. In same cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court 5tree#, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in '1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ri#z Theater around 1930. Many of these new bindings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa iZamona School in 1925 and San Bernardina College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1934s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constricted at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, bath built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenie, and the San Bernardino Cu[#ural Center and l=ire Hall on E Street, biilt around 1933. At tl~e end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel birned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." {San Buenaventura, 2005) See: Confrnuatinn Sheef. 811. Addit"tonal Resource Attributes: {List attributes and codes) H P2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *812. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (bonaldson) Tract 3AN 4~sRNa4~ple~o crrv use w4L50N II ELEt~ ENTRRY SCHOOL 347E Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino PROPERTY O~AiNEftSMIP MAP General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ____, Research Associates). ~ i r~f~ _r- ,sneer ~ B13» Remarks• l ~ ° ~ za n n ° ~ ~ °~~C7 0 ~ ~ ~" ~ w This resource is located within the proposed development area far the _c d -~ Wilson II Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ° ~ E" ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ " '_ ~'? ,„ CEQA. ~ ° ~ Ed ¢A Q ° h ~ f2 4 ~ " *B14. Evaluator: Andr45a Urbas, M.Arch., AIGP ~ PT J4 +T *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ® 11 ~ " °~~,~rt>~°. ~~--'s• ntl ° it xs xf ,A iii r,»~~r.',«a z n~eu:w _ .~.,. ..,.. ~ ~ ° ° I o ° ' Ea E¢ O _,_,~ ~_L~ ~~, ~nA s,,,,~.-..r~~ {This space reserved far official comments.) ~ °" ^A`" "' ~' '~' ~ ~ & ~ C= s t ~ i ~l. aF N SQ d! bJ aA Ltl !W .1b 59 6f EA l , 1 t VRrmlL,vM Sn~o fa~ilYSlvAfk4Vio (&rrtl ~O Ohno~4ca{AM ~a.ya~,octo m+ ~h nanm vatarc State of California ---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIQN HRI# CUNTINUATl4N SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 "Resource Name or # 2584 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino/ Bonita Gardens, I.nt 17 ~Recarded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~*L]ate: '1115107 ~ Continuation ®Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War 11, the development and expansion of Dorton Air force Base an the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transpartafiian center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city fallowing the completinn of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica befiween 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 86 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within Phis context Include: wand Frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved an May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Cnlanial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1322 (lot 32j, and it is assumed that this building served as the made) home. The next home was completed in 1323 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and Int 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25t~' Street Three addifiinnal homes were constructed in 1328 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, Prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Repression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completinn of Ints 22 and 25, followed by three ants in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 27), four in 9937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 193$ (lots 7 and 91), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19~, and one in 1941 (Int 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1347 (lot 8), and continued with fats S and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950x: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed an similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Signifreance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identi#icatian of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 5fl years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (cj, as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a Type, period...", and pursuant to California Register Criterion f13, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1950, and as such it is outside of the period of significance far Bonita Gardens, and thus, cannot be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523E (1195) *Required information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # E11w1'ARTMBNT OI" PARFCS AND RECREATIDN HRl # P~.~~~~~ ~E~®~® Trinomial NRHP Status Cade 6U Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 '"Resource Noma or Bonita Gardens, Lot 09 P1. Other Identifier: 2585 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ? Not for Publication d Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.} *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Qate: T.1N; R.~W ; '/a SE of '/a S6 of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: 2585 N. Berkley Avenue City: San Bernardino Zip; 924D5 d. UTM: Zone: 1D ; mEl mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parael #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate} Elevation: Parse[ # 0149-173-01-0-OOo *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single-family residential dwelling was constructed in 1950, as a single-story wood-framed structure with across-gabled roof. "im"-shaped in plan and totaling approximately 1,163 square feet in area, it is defined by one central window, below a louvered, rectilinear ventilation window in the gable, The recessed (side-gabled) wing is defined by the main doorway within the "L", protected by a security door, and a tripartite picture window to its Ieft..Aluminum awnings are located above the windows. This dwelling sits on a 0.1492-acre parcel. Stylistically, it can be described as a Post-WWII Ranch, *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: (Building ©Structure ?Object ?Site ?District QElement of District ?Other (tsalates, etc.} PSa. Photo or Drawin (Photo re uired for buildings, structures, and objects.) PSb. Descriptlan Of Photo: (View, ~, ,,~, , , date, accession #) ': * View of the southwest corner of the building; taken 1012312007; digital. n ''~ - 5~ *P6. [}ate ConstractedlAge and Sours®s: C~IHistaric :~' , ?Prehistoric ?Both _ ,~`': ~ j -~ ,. 1950 (DRS: 20D5 DataQuick) R 't% *P7. Owner and Address: Mary Darden y. 2585 N. Berkley Avenue cr ~ ~,, ~ San Bernardiina, CA 92405 try ~ ~.'r ="', ~ "~- *P8» Recorded by: (Name, ,~, -~` af€iliation, and address) `~" Andrea Urbas, M.Areh., AICP ~ ~ ~,. - ~ Kleinfelder . ,,, ,~ " 122D Research Dr., Ste B ,~~~;~~ '~':`~~°~~ ``t~ Redlands, GA 92374 ~, ', *P9. Date Recorded: ~'`~ >~~~,~`~~,~ ~,~~.s ~u November 5,2D07 .~~~- '~.N ~ ~ ~w"`Y R. ~r ~, ~~, ~,~,~ ~,.~~,,~~, ~ a~ a•.r~~~ P10. Survey Type: (Describe) ~ w,' .,~ ~ ~ rte: ~~,~~~s ~ ~ ~4 CEQA-Wilson II EIR =:~e~ , . *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none."} San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2D05), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMNb Wilson II Elementary (UR5 2005) '`Attachments: ?NONE ©Location Map ?Sketch Map L~ICnntinuation Sheet L~lBuilding, Structure, and Object Record ?Archaeological Record ?District Record ?Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ?Artifact Record ?Phntograph Record ? Other {List): OPR 523A (1135) *Requlred Information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMIENT OF PARKS AND RECREATIDN WRl# ~IJ~L®INC, ~T"RlJCTURE, AN® E)BJE~T REC®R® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Cade Flt Resource Name ar # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 09 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 09 B2. Camman Name: 2685 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *65. Architectural Style: Post-WWII Ranch *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Original construction 1950; *67. Moved? fNa ©Yes ©Unknavun Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with a two-car garage. 89a. Architect: Unknown, BSb. Builder: Unknown *E310. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Properly Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Flan (2005) Regional Cu?ture (9917-1945}. As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in eeonnmic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the canter core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new camrrrercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 9927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 9928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino Calfege in 1927. boring the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, same with New Deal funding, Works Progress Administration (1NPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 nn Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on F Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuation Sheef. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (Lisle attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *512. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson} Tract sAGU ae~zrrnRai~o crrr usa Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino '~~~' ~°~~a~~ov~~an'i~RSHivH°nn°as~Te General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura 5 Research Associates). ~ ~ ~,~ -r- , R o I ~ ° ,,,r~ 2a r~ n ° ~n~ a Y~. ° r n p ~' 613. Remarks: °'. "`~. , This resource is located within the proposed development area for the ~, c~ r x, Wilson ll Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ K,:~pMP° ~ ~ ° t ~ ~ a ~, „ ~ /. ry _ ,~~~.... CEQA. ~ ~ ~ P6 ro ~ ~ ,~ R ° ,~alY 4 ~L n ~' .rim w ~!:,. 3^ ~' ~r.:xn ~ ~ FA S a i?~. *614. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP j l g~ ~ ;"~~° _'""^a *[9ate of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ ~." ° c~,~~,a ~ ~-'a• k ^0 e ° ~ a ~ as a! n ~n e~«~r.~.a y ~,rL~ is a ~ O era to O .,,r ~ ~ E~al~e B *Q ~ '' f 261A, (This Space reSenJed far offlcral COmmentS.) o N r ,ur. acr .~'+...ao ca Fn u.r on w p ~R i;° xR kR ~' ~ w --jj ~I s! an as ~ ae n a° as sa ~ u ae a° 3 F N Vacpn laM S:v~c F°v1yAo-1Nnn 18FIX} ~~9~ 6mWr du~Ffi. A Frroam`lrstka L`,J AaMad Y//~¦1 V.YiR, _ State of California --~- The Resources Agency Primary # aEPARTMENT OI? PARKS ANB RECREATION NRI# CUNTIIVUATIOIV SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 2585 N. Berkley Avenue, San Bernardino, Bonita Gardens, Lot 09 *Recorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICF *Date: 1715107 ~ Continuation D Update Gantext cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in '1940. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Nartnn Air Farce Base nn the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of fhe automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and dawn Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potential properly types within this context !nclade: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved nn May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 192fls. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Aertod Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 95fl square feet in area, and consisted of five rotlms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and int 18 in '1926. The primary construction tank place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25~~' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of tats 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the tJS entry Into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8}, and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950x: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar tots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in mare massive, box-like designs. Historic Signitrcance and Eligibility Milford Wayne l]onaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a anntributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1950, as and as such is outside of the period of significance for Bonita Gardens, and therefore, cannot be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523E (9195} *Required information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OP PARKS AND RECREATION HRi # PR.~~~~~ Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6U Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 08 P1. Other identifier: 2502 N. F Street *P2. Location. ©Not for Publication Q Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Laaation Map as necessary.} *b. USGS 7,5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/a SS of '/a Sir of SeC.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address, 2502 N. F Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN (G.P,S.) e. Other Locationai Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate} Elevation: Parcel # 0149-173-09-0-000 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is asingle-family residential dwelling originally constructed in 9947. The building is a single-sfory wood-framed structure, with a hipped roof, and roughly "L"-shaped in shape. The primary elevation is defined by a small parch, located in the "L", followed by three aluminum sliding widows. Stylisticly it is a Post WW1[ Tract. This iuilding measures approximately 1,332 square feet in area, and sits a 0.1ti12-acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attriibutes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: ©Building ©Structure ©Object ?Site ©District C~Element of Bistrict i7Other (Isolates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawin Photo re aired for buildings, structures, and objects.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, - , ,; . , ~ - date, accession #) '~''t ' ~'' ,; :i ,f` View of the soufiheas# corner of the ' , } ~~,, building; taken 1012312007; digital. ~ ~ '~, , r . - ? '~ ~f,;; - *PB. Date ConstructedlAge and nt ~ ~:,.. ric .y Sources: QHisto ~, r .Y a ,. ,=~ x~ ~ <, ,, ~ , , ,.. ~, ~s ~ ?Prehtstone ClBath ~~,. 1947 URS: 2©05 DataQuick 3~ ~ . ( ) F ~, , kl, *P7. Owner and Address: ~ ~ °~- Ambrose and Grace Braun ~'~}~,. ~f~f. 4, 2502 N. F Street r ,~~ ~ , ~ . ~, ~~' g. San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~ " , " t~ 2~ ` ~ k - ;~~' '~ ~"- *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affi€iation, and address) Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP Kieinfelder ~~s~ _ 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ...,, ~ ~, ~"., r Redlands, CA 92374 ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ - *P9. Date Recorded: . a;;- :e ~ November 5, 2007 *P1 a. Survey Type: (Describe} ~ CEQA Wilson II EIR *P91. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, ar enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quiek; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2(105); DMND Wilson II Elementary (URS 2005) *Attachments: ©NONE ?Location Map ©Sketch Map QContinuation Sheet C~1Buiiding, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaeological Record ©District Record ©Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ©Ar#ifact Record ©Photograph Record ©Other (List): DPt2 523A (9l85) *#tequired infnrmatian State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # pEPARTMENT OF PAR®K~~SggANp RECREAjT~ION pp~vo~°p~ pH.RI# ®6~~~®~N~y ~~91LV~~~~~y Y!N® ®~J~4r I ~~4i®~~ Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Cade 6U *Resource Name ar # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 08 B1. f-listoric Name: Bonita Gardens, l-ot DS 82. Common Name: 2502 N. P Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dweping B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *65. Architectural Style: Post WWII Tract *66. Construction History» (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) originally constructed in 1947. Breezeway extension (1012011975); water closet, a shower, and kitchen sink {212311973}; re- roofing (1 012 511 9 89); HVAC (611911997). (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department}. *l37. Moved? C~JNo ©Yes ~Unknawn IJate: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. 69a. Architec#: Unknown. 69b. Builder: Unknown X810. Significance: Theme» Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005) Regional Culture (1917-9945}, As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled nr replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927, A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as wail. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (5an Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuation Sheet. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (E.ist attributes and codes? HP2 {Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *812. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson} Tract snNa~RNAftacr~ocrrYUSo Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Klement City of San Bernardino wJILSONIIELEMENTAftYSGHO0L5RE General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura as°a~RTYOwN~ftst~ir~r,+wP Research Associates}. ~ ~0 zsY~ -r- sr~r k 813. Remarks» d n ~r n ~ ~ ~, A F~n a ~' i I ~ ~~,~~ This resource is located within the proposed development area far the ~ r~, $+ _$ r~ " ~ ~ ~ ~a e ~ ~ ~"' -._ .N Wilson Il Klementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to "'~ ° ~p~'~, re ~' ~ ° ~ ~ ° ~ „ , ~ a ~ CEQA. ~n o~.a,O ee to Q ° ~ ~F ° V3 !e a N~ *814. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ ° O :$ ° p " ~!, ~ .......,,caan u~,~n . ....rRr,x~w. *pate of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 GU `~, ~ « ~ ~ ~Y° •a. e6 b 8F R k ~ o 16 7 ° ~ i x F~ Clw C3 y~, q Ev.-,.w.rnrw, ~ O J,G ~ ~•,~ k c. ~-1, Kg Yp F tltll 55) Y 0,,, 6n !)Y , X.S dri RN {This space reserved far official comments.) ° ~ R a p" g , r ~ ° e ~ R ° ~ a t R ~ ~ i w 1. se sa as ee as ae a! as ay u ae ao , t L•.eam, Lx° W &'rl{Ya pm=YFTp ~s~P4~"(&FRI 9 Onn¢, Q6CI.F.~' R~-4C~u4tl 104MM ~ RnMe6 _ , ?V Vs[S.i State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION FiRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 2502 N. F Street, San Bernardino/ Bonita Gardens, Lot 08 '"Recorded lay: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *Dai:e: 11/5/07 ~ Continuation ~ Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard Mcl3anald opened the first McC3analds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 194ps, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War ll, the development and expansion of Dorton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica befinreen 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: woad frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bnnifa Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations pf the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, Including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 {fat 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next Dome was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25`" Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 {lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the stark of the Great Depression. Development of the tract starked again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 {lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 {fats 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 72). Development halted again with the US entry Into WWII, and did oat commence again until 1947 {lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did oat continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms His#aric District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay done and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period...", and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...°'. This building was constructed in 1947, and is outside of the period of significance. Furthermore, the style and massing of the home's design are oat consistent with the original buildings within the Bonita Gardens Tract. As such, it does not appear to be eligible for either the National or California Registers. Di'R 523E (1195) "Required information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION NRI # ~~~~/4~~ Trinomial NRHP Status Cade 3CD Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name ar #: Bonita Gardens, Lat D7 P'I. Other Identifier: 2512 N. F Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: D Nat for Publication ®Unrestricted "`a. County: San Bernardino County and {P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Nlap as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1N; R.4W ; '/~ 5E of '/a SF of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2512 N. F Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 924D5 d. I~TM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN {G.P.S.) e. Other Locationai Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevatien, etc., as appropriate) ~2evation: Parcel # 0149-173-OS-0-000 *P3a. Description: {Llescribe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is asingle-family residential dwelling originally constructed in 1938. The building is a single-story wood-framed Ranch with a side-gabled roof. Rectangular in shape, the primary elevation is dominated full-width parch supported by wood posts with chamfered {ogee) capitals,. Afour-panel door with fanlight is centered within the porch, and is flanked by two large aluminum slider windows. A chimney is located at the right elevation. This building measures approximately 1,348 square feet in area, and sits on a 0.1504-acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: C~Building ©Structure ?Object ©Site ©District L~Element of District ©Other (Isolates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawinq~ {Photo required for buildings, sjructures, and ob'ects. P5b. Description of Photo: {View, ,~ ;~,~~ ,~ ~~,,, .,:, - ~, n ~,i ~ ~ ~ date, accession #) `°N~: v.. View of the southeast corner of the " .,, , ° building; taken 1012312DD7; digital. / ty t ~' ~ Da ConstructedlA a and .:~~.-s: i~; P6. to g }' `'i '.} '. Sources: t?fHistaric 7 : ~ a ~ ~ .s ?Prehistoric ©Both ft ,~ N, f 4 .^,;. ~ ~',,:.. "'' 1938 {tJRS: 2005 DataQuick) t . ~ d~:'rF '•L s ~ *P7. Owner and Address: k ''' '~ '' Robert and Mary Stieb ta; m r ~,s ~~w,' 2512 N. F Street ~ a't° ., ~ s'~` San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~, ~f' ~ ~ .- *P8. Recorded by: {came, '~~~ affiliation, and address) ~ Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AfCP ~ Kleinfelder f~ , i~ h ~ ~ 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ~ Redlands, CA 92374 ~ E3 t 4 *P9. bate Recorded: ~' November 5, 2D07 ~'~~ `" *P90. Survey Type: ([3escribe) r,~;;~ CEQA --Wilson ll EIR -~~;r *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, nr enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991} Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2D05), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson ll Elementary {tJRS 2005) *Attachments: ?NONE ©Location Map l~Sketch Map ©Cantinuation Sheet L~Building, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaeological Record ?District Record ?Linear Feature Record ©Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ©Artifact Retard ©Photograph Record ~ other (List): tiPR 523A (1195) *Required information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMETdT OF PARKS p1dD RECREATIDPd HRi# CiUtL®fNG, STRUCTURE, ANA ®~JECT REC®R® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 3 CD *Resource Name or # {Assigned by retarder) Bonita Gardens, Ln# 07 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 07 B2. Common Name: 2512 N. i= S#reet, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4, Present Use: Residen#ial Dwelling CBS. Architectural Style: Classical Revival Ranch *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations} Originally constructed in 1938; !patio (1212711962}; re-roofed wi#h composition shingles (313111983). {Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *B7. Moved7 17Na ©Yes ©Unknown Date: Original l.acatian: '~B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with athree-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown ~B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential t]weEling Applicable Criteria: CR31NRc (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geagrapl~ie scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005) Regional Culture (1917 7945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,0(}0. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this grow#h. In some cases older buildings in the down#awn were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Black on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store bath built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 (allowed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalen# styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Gass Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, severs! public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration {WPA} funds were used to build the auditoriums a# San Bernardino High School and Valley College and #o restore the Asistencia Mission. ether public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuation Sheet. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and nodes} HP2 {Sketch Map with north arrow required.) '872. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Surve Donaldson Tract SAiI a~araArrnlNO clTV use Y ( ) 'NiLSt3N II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SETE Map; Da#a Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino GEtOpERTYdwNER5HIPGAAP General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context San Buenaventura L__-- -__ l Q Research Associates. ~ i ~rh wr_ srRFer• a ~ I~ _ ~ ~ B13. Remarks: c a e. iexM~-,f ° A ~ ® iv ¢~(s~~~ ° ce' This resource is located within the proposed development area for the W a Es ,~ ~ _' ; p rr a ~ " ~ja ~rm Wilson II Elementary Schnnl Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ~ ~,x~.e ~ ~' ~ ._.Y "814.1=valuator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ z © x ~ „ m ~ e *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 p -• W .a " ~aqe._:,",_ is a R • ~ ~ ° .:,, cn . ep wa r (This space reserved for official comments.) L - I. ar ~v ao ae as ae as as sr as ar w I r Vcwp lard $'i,~4 Fam(y Rmidn~oo lBFft~ ~4.R.m OUSI+~~d A Y/(Ra\ Wn. ~ruL Y.hrt R NerA J VJWK State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # t}PPRRTMBNT OF PARKS AIVD RIWCRFATION HRl# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinnrnial Page 3 of 3 'Resource Na€~e ar # 2592 N. F Street, San 8ernardinol Bonita Gardens, Lot 07 *F:ecorded by: Andrea rbas, M.Arch., Arcr `Date: X1/5/©7 Cantinuatian ©Update Context cant. "Maurice and Richard McQonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter'of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War !l, the development and expansion of Norton Air Farce Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city fallowing the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled aver the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within Phis context include. wand frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial 86 manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved nn May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighbarhoad of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The Intl measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1322 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model hams. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 7927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 2S`" Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11}, and three in 1939 (fats 1, 2 and 19}, and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the tJS entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final names, although constructed an similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in mare massive, box-like designs. Nlsfaric Srgnlficance and Eligibilify Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead overlay zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion tf3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1938, as part of the 2"d phase of the original tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. DPR 523E {1185) `Required information State of California-----The Resources Agency Primary # DI~PAR7MI=NT Oi" PAR6CS AND RECREAI"ION F1Ri # ~[~~~/~~~ ~~~r®~® Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6C0 Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lat 06 P1. Other Identifier: 2524 N, F Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Not for Publication Q Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/a SE of '/a SE of Seo,28; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: 2524 N. 1= Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE! mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevat'son, eta., as appropriate} Elevation: Parcel # 0149-773-07-fl-OOQ *P3a. Description: (bescribe resource and its major elements. lnciude design, rneteriafs, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This Classical Revival Cottage with aside-gabled roof is a single-story masonry-clad, wood frame structure, rectangular in shape, and totaling approximately 936 square feet, it sits on a 0.1504-acre lot. The primary elevation is dominated by ashed-roofed, full- width porch, with a central gable supported by kwo battered Doric columns which rests atop square piers. Centered below the front gable is a four-panel door with fanlight, flanked by two picture windows. Asked-roofed addition appears to the rear of the dwelling. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: L~lBuilding ©Structure ©Object ©Site ©District [Element of bistrict ©Other (isolates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) P5b» Description of Photo: (View, ~ date, accession #) View of the southeast corner of the r~ ~ 4 ~ building; taken 10/2312DD7; digital. 1 % ~ L r~ _ xr~~ ~ ~- F n~ ~ ~'~~ ) *PB. Date ConstructedlAge and FF Sources: ~lHistoric ~ C~Prehistoric ?Both 1923 URS: 2005 DataQuick) *P7. Owner and Address: Ricardo Beltran ~~',,~,~'. _ 2524 N. 1= Street ;eft>~+ San Bernardino, CA 92405 F ~n a *P$. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address) '~ Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP Kleinfelder 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ` ~ a ~~,;~.;~_,,~e.~ Redlands, CA 92374 ~,~. ~ _~„, , *P9. Date Recorded: ~~''~ November 5, 2007 "'2~X7~ y ~`^~y, z~w~ y ~,~~~: ~' x ~'~~ *P10. Survey Type: (l]escribe) ~ a , ~ ~ ~ ~ CEQA --W31son 11 ElR s ~ ~x:;uSM.h -.:X:\rs,ex~".....v,, ~Y'Sr. H~n. *F11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance ', Survey {bonaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2DD5); DMND Wilson Il Elementary (URS 2005} "Attachments: ©NONI= ©Location Map ©Skefeh Map C~fContinuation Sheet QBuilding, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaeologieal Record l~District Record ©Linear Feature Recot~d ?Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ©Artifact Record ClPhotograph Retard ©Other (List): faPR 523A (1195) Required information State of California--The Resources Agency Primary ~ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECRiATION HRI# E3UIL®[NG, ~TRUCTIJ~iE, AND DEJECT RED®R® Page 2 of 3 *NRNP Status Code 3CD *Resource Name nr ~# (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, lMot 06 61. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, L.ot 06 B2. Common Name: 2524 N. 1= Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Driginal Use: Residential l~weiling 64. Present Use: Residentia{ Dwelling *B5. Architecturat Style: Classical Revival Cottage *B6. Construction Nistnry: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1923 {Source: DataQuick}. *67. Moved? tNn ©Yes t7Unknawn Date: Driginal Location: *1~8. Related Features: The property is also developed with cone-car garage. BBa. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *B1U. Signlfrcance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR311~iRc (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined toy theme, period, and geographic scope, Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005) Regional Culfure (1917-1S45j. As described with'sn the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a welt- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 15,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced wi#h new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Stare both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 an Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Culturat Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." {San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuation Sheet. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes anti codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.} * VVIL5~tJNl ELEMENTARY scHaob 5[TE 612. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract PROPERTY OUdNERSHIP MAP Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element Gity of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ a ~fR _ ""T"" ara~r A Research Associates.). m ,~, i~ n ze e~ n ~r~~ ° r nb '~` ° a ~ ° s0 t_. .a ~ t7 x 4 n x, 613. Remarks: ~ e' This resource is located within the proposed development area for the °'~ ° ® za ,s ~ ° ~ t ° ~ ~, a [~~q ~' nM+an. f ~~~,.:.,. Wilson it Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant ro ~ ~ M1~,~ es e° o ° ~ ~ ~ ,g a ~ ~;n ~ ° ~ 13 e ~ ° *894. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP CO ~ ~,~ °,~„~ r+ e n ° i *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 a.uu ~ b..a,u s„ ~ ' ~ ~ N {Th15 Space reSerVed far Official Comments.) -Eb1A` ^?z wr ~ a, waY ems fl R # ° o ~ P p° ~ d D ~ e ~ w ~ t S ~ U . c a~ c: c cK a cd ~ a I .a .w se ss ~ ne to sr ru >rr m j . 1T~ _ N Vxuml EnrC 5'r.~~F,fN1Y~~~fBFfl) ~AnNO~tl~[w`1CN,_,._. Ccsource LOm:bi ~ Ib!3aa. VePaN _ _ State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DI~PARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRi# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 2524 N. F Street, San Bernardino) Bonita Gardens, Lot 06 *Recorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *Date: 111510'7 ~ Continuation ©Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDnnalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the Gity's population o140,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railrnad. However, with the advent of World War I!, the development and expansion of Marton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city fallowing the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Mnnica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: woad frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial 8~ manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Gattages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic Interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five roams, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6], followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took plane during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25`" Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (Eats 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three Ints in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in '1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19), and one In 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining loll were in-filled in the early 195ps: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and Iot 4Q in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar Inls, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Millard Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being signilicant or a contributor to any of these classifications. palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and ,4rrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, Is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1923, as part of the original tract design, maintains adequate historical Integrity to be considered a potential contributor. i UPF2 523E (1195) *Requ'sred information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial NRhP Status Code 6U Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Hate Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lat 05 P1. Other Identifier': 2534 N. F Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ? Not for Publicat"ran Q Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1N; R.AIW ; '/< SE of '/< SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2534 N. F Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zane: 10 ; mEl mN {G.P.S.} e, Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-173-06-0-DOE} *P3a. Description: (Descr'sbe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single-story wood frame post-WWII Tract home, with a hipped roof was originally constructed in 1948. It is "t"-shaped in- shape, with a clipped corner resul#ing in a recessed porch with the entrance door and rectangular window); and incorporates approximately 835 square feet in area. To the left of the corner porch, are two windows (possibly double-hung) with prominent sills defining the two corners of the primary facade. This dwelling sits on a 0.1504-acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: ~tBuilding ©Structure ?Object ?Site ?District DElement of District ?Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a Photo or Drawing {Photo required for buildings, structures, and ob;ects) P5b• Description of Photo: (View, .-.~-~ -. ~;r; date, accession #) '' ~ ' ' View of the northeast corner of the building; taken 1012312007; digital. ~'" _ - 9 *P6. Date ConstructedlA a and x ~, ~ ~n .~'''~ ~ ( ~~'`~' °.z Sources: F~HIStoriC ~,~r'f ~ 1:~ ` ,~ 4? ` ©Prehistaric ?Both ~ Sy {z~.~. : 1948 (URS: 2005 DataQuick) ~ t: 4 *P7. Owner and Address: , ' `'x° ~ Fidel and Margarita Herrera 14058 Shadow Drive Fontana, CA 92337 ~~,. ,r . ~ ~ ` ~ *P8. Recorded by: (Name, "'f. affiliation, and address) (R ° Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ y. Kleinfelder ~ 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ,~ - ~ , "'~ y Redlands, CA 92374 .1 ~ 4 R ~ ' x ? ~ *P9. Date Recorded: November 5, 2007 ~ ri~~ ~o - ~ r ,~ ~-. 4 ~ *P10» Survey Type: (©escribe) ~ -~.,~7 ~v ', -~ ~,: CEQA Wilson 1I EIR sx *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991} Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005}; DMND Wilson II Elementary (URS) *Attachments: ?NONE ©L.ocation Map ?Sketch Map OCnntinua#ion Sheet C~JBuilding, Structure, and Abject Record ?Archaenlogical Record ?District Record ?Linear Fee#ure Record ?Milling Station Record ?Rock Art Record ©Artifact Record ?Photograph Record ? Other (L.ist): DPR 523A (1195) *Required information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OE PARKS AND RECREATION HRl# BUIL®iNG, ~TRUCT'URE, AN® ~~JECT RISC®R® Page 2 of 3 *NRNP Status Code 6U *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recprder) Bonita Gardens, Lat 05 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 05 B2. Common Name: 2534 N. F Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: past-WWII Tract *B6. Gonstructian Fl%story: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1548; re-roofing (812511976). {Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *B7". Moved? ONo ©Yes ©iJnknawn Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: 89a. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *B1i). Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA ([liscuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope, Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005) Regional Culture (9997-9945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center corn to accommodate this growth. In same eases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block an W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1827 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings tank on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era n# the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with Now Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, bath built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and dire Hall on E Street, built around 1933, At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built-" (San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuatlan Sheet. B11. Additional Resource Attributes. (List attributes and codes) HP2 {Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *812. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson} Tract SAN sIWRNARpIS~o CITY usp WILSpN II ELEMENTARY &CH6pL SrrE Map; Data Quick, Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino PRtlPERTY OWt+iER33iIP MAP General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ~ ~Q Research Associates). ~ rosfk _ R nom -~ ES F7 ~ o ~ ~ ~ 0 w~wq -xrm .___.ecwmo 813. Remarks: l ~ e a ~ zs re,(yZ ~ ~ Q to a n E This resource is located within the proposed development area for the v~-~x'.~~ Fes„ _ _ ~ :y Wilson Il Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~t..°/ Y° Y° n ~V~.~ f ~' .A° Y~ ' n ~" P CEQA. ~ ~ V ZB Y° © C h o ....Q fY 4 ~ R cre~c,~Cm«. ACMr, ~H ~ %wM....' PT J.~aw u ' `514. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP f er 'Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 O ~ ~ Y. ° ~ ~'' ~-- a { 'g. ~, m a ' = I' ~>li,,.Q W ,, ga ~ O~E'P RS Q ~ ,~ R ®16 A ~ r ry +kec. .wue ~naa« ro d,, . o "ye a . ~, (This space reserved for official comments.) Ea`r' -~ ' o.~k a u- FF yq &.X Ty b ~ 2 ` ~ ~ E 6 ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ a f. C° C n° ~ r ~ r i ~ -~-~ ° cw c° c` o c' ~ o` llr ~i sG ?tU L6 !1 ae dA a9 87 Ef Eli !G I 1 N VumlE.aM 6b~~o PemYyR~'(kriro;SFF7 ~4 oxnoi OaWxa, . aFmoRetemrn ~ Y,gelt,y State of California ---•-The Resources Ageney Primary # bEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANQ RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resouree Name or # 2534 N. F Street, San Bernardino! Bonita Gardens, Lot 05 '"Recorded by: Andrea Elrbas, M.Arch., AICP *Date: 17!5107 s Continuation ©Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McClonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa t`e Railroad. However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Norton Air f=orce Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor, San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and trunk routes. Route 66 was built through the city fallowing the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica befinreen 1926 and 1937. In San Bemardina the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route 88 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this confext include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial 8~ manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved an May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represenfied in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonia# Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five morns, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building seared as the model home. The next name was completed in 1923 (loft &), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1928, The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25~' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one {lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 (fats 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lofts 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 72). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1946. The last remaining fats were in-tilled in the early 9950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and Int 40 In 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar tats, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program In San Bernardino, as welt as the Identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Crr"terion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1948, and is outside of the period of significance. Additionally, the style and massing of this dwelling are inconsistent with that of the Bonita Gardens Tract. As such it is not a contributor to this potential historic district. DPR 8231. (f195) `Ftequirec[ information State of California --The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT DF PARKS AND RECREATIDN IiRi # ~}'~~~~~~ ~ECi®~® Trinomial NRhlp Status Code 3CD Dther Listings Review Code Reviewer Date page 1 of 3 "`Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 04 P1» Dther Identifier: 2548 N. F Street, San Bernardino *p2. Location: ? Nat for Publication Q Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc o€ P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.'I N; R.4W ; '/4 SE of '/< SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2548 N. F Street Cify: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN (f^,.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., pa€cel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Plevation: Parcel # 0149-173-05-Q-~0€3 *PBa. Description: (beseribe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This dwelling is an Eclectic (Classical Revival and Craftsman) Cottage with aside-gabled roof. It is single-story in height, and is clad 'in clapboard and masonry. Rectangular in shape and totaling approximately 957 square feet in area, it sits on a 0,1504-acre lot. The primary elevation is dominated by agable-roofed, 314-width porch, supported by two battered Doric columns which rest atop square red brick masonry piers, at the right end of the building. The entry door (protected by a security door and athree-part picture window is located within the parch. To the left is a small gable surmounting and arched window (appear to be recent modifications). *P3b» Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *p4. Resources present: ©Building ?Structure ?Object ©5ite ?District C~Element of District ?Other {Isolates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildin s, structures, and ob"ects P5b• Description of photo: (View, _ ~,,U date, accession #) '' ~ ~A, ~ ' ,ep~°~' View of the east side of the r .' ~"~~~.. »' building; taken 1012312007; digital. -r ~°- - r~~`:~ ~ *P6. Date ConstructedlAgecnd „ Sources: ©Historic ,~. '"° "` ?Prehistaric ?Both ,~.'-~.: 1932 (URS: 2005 DataQuick) r~;: ~, *P~". Owner and Address: ',~ ~`;~~,, Lucinda 1=11iot (frost) _ 13036 Gray Lane a~ ~ .,,,~ ~' ' Nevada City, CA 96959 `J ry~ ~ « *p8. Recorded by: {Name, ,,~ affiliation, and address) s ~ Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP -~" "~ ~' Kleinfelder ;,.' s to B arch Dr. S 1220 Rese ~ - Redlands, CA 92374 ~k~ „.,A, ; ~ fi " *p9. Date Recorded: ~~~-" ' ~ ~~'`~~"~ "~ ~' ,. November 5, 2007 ~ n ~'' ~ °~~'~~~" ~ ~'~~ ~ "' *P90. Survey Type: (Describe) ~ ~ ~ Y x~x ~ ~ ~ ~ ° h<~ ~ ~~~,~,~~;~~~, ~ CEQA -Wilson ll EIR *p11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991} Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation ' Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005}; DMND Wilson ll Elementary {URS 2005) *Attachments: ?NONE ©Location Map ?Sketch Map 1?lContinuation Sheet ©Building, Structure, and Object Record ?Archaeological Record ?District Record ?Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ?Rock Art Retard ©Artifact Record ?Phntograph Record ? Other (List): DPR 523A (1l95) "'Required information State of Caiifnrnia-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRl# BU[L®~IVC, STRUCTURE, AN® ABJECT REC®R® page 2 of 3 *NRHp Status Code 3CD '"Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 04 61. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 04 B2. Common Name: 2548 N. F Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. C?riginal Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present l1se: Residential Dwelling X136. Architectural Style: Eclectic Period Revival Cottage (Classical and Bungalow) ~`B6. Construction History: {Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1932; vinyl siding (101711999). (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department}.; modification to window and additional of a front gable (n.d.) (Source: visual inspection) *B7. Moved? C~No ©Yes ©Unknawn Date: Original t.ocation: X68. Related Features: The property is also developed with aone-car garage. B9a. Architect: llnknnwn. k39b. Builder: tJnknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California period of Significance: 1922-19441 Property Typo: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR3/NRc (~iseuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005) Regional Gulfure (19f ~'-'1945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled ar replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Bloek on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Stare bath built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was aanstructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took an the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona Schaal in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, same with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Qther public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned far the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005}. See: Cantinuafian Sheet. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 {Sketch Map with north arrow required.} SAN BERNARDINO CITY USC '612. References: 1991 Reaannaissance Surve Donaldson Tract wl:.soN r3 ELEMENTARY scsooL stTE Y { ) PROPERTY OWNERSYi3P NIAP Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ~ _r., sr~r a Research Associates.). ~ ~ as „ ,n ° tqt' ° "~ o ~ n ~, ~' B13. Remarks: ~ oa.eav~ e~ ~e n cuy ~ ~ o,,,,Q +D B (a~4p ° ~ This resource is located within the proposed development area far the „ ° n ea ~a n ° ~ ~, ° ~ ~Y ~ ~N Wilson Il Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant ~~"~ Y ,~,~R to CEQA. ~~.,, m ~,°. ° R e~ _ ~ x`614. Evaluator: Andrea tJrbas, M.Arch., AICP O c~ ro a,~~,~,.. ~ La. '"Date of Evalcation: November 5, 2007 „ " ~ ~,m at ~ ~,q ~xi o ra t nn ,~ ;s, ° O as sap ° ~:,~ pia e 0 ~ ( 410 6Yi %]. 44Y U9 t+ f\ .WS Vryryyy ?a!+ (This space reserved for official comments.) t~~ Eb:a. 4 ~' _....I ° ~ 9 ° ~ ° A W, ~ e d w 1. 41 3a ,~ xa Si na ee J4 !J a 3t ~ . 1 I ! ds/p~ Y 1 . Vacm,lAnd S~raJo FamiY ~'Oenw (3F'21 ~Onna Q,r=i"lat Pna4.CCL:gSYrt 2 Norfp.l . ~VUaN _ ., '... State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # i}EPARTMENT OF PARKS ANl] RECREATION HRl# GUNTINUATIC~N SNEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 '"Resource Name or # 2548 N. F Street, San Bernardino) Bonita Gardens, Lot 04 *Recorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICp *Da#e: 1115107 Gvntinuation ? Update Gontext cant. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McG3onalds` hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the Guy's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of Wnrid War 11, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base an the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional #ranspartatian center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city fallowing the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Gajan Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potentfa! property types within this can#ext include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 192ps. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Reviva! Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The tots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1522 and 9939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32j, and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next Name was completed in 1923 [tot 6j, followed by Int 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily tong 25t'' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 2fs, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three tots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 29 ), four in 1337 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25j, two in 1938 (tats 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lets 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12j. Development halted again with the US entry Iota WWII, and did oat commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with tats 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-fitted in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed vn similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Signifrcance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations far the establishment of a historic preserva#ion program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be poten#ially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1932, as part of the 2n~ phase of the original tract design, maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. C3PR 523E (1I3b) "Required information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMPNT OF PARKS AND RECREATIOI•1 tiRl # ~~~~A~~ ~E~®R® Trinomial NRI~P Status Code 6U Other Listings Review Cade Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 03 P1. Other Identifier: 2560 N. F Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ? Nnt far Publication D Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.} *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/4 SE of '/.a S~ of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2560 N. F Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; rnEl mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, eievatian> etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-173-04-0-000 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single-story "L"-shaped cottage, with crass_gabled roof, and Classical and Tudor Revival features. The projecting front gable of this wood framed, clapboard- clad dwelling is defined by a rectangular, lowered window, centered above a paired diamond-paned wood double-hung window. A parch within the "L", has been extended into the driveway to incorporate a room addition; and is supported by three wood posts. A double faun-panel door with fanlights is located to the left of the projecting bay, followed by a paired 12-light window. Measuring approximately 1,745 square feet; this building sits on a parcel totaling approximately 0.1504-acres. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (t_ist attributes and codes) HP2 '"P4. Resources Present: QBuilding ?Structure ©Objeet ?Site ?Distriet I~JElement of District ©4ther (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo or Drawin Pfioto required for buildings, structures, and objects.} PSb. Description of Photo: (view, date, accession #) ~ ~ View of the southeast corner of the. ,,, , building; taken 1012312007; digital, ~ ~.,,A~ ~ *P8. Date CanstructedlAge and ., '9 „ Sources: QHistnric ;~, _ ©Prehistoric 1JBoth -;'~ 1932 (URS: 2005 DataQuick) *P7. Owner and Address: M1t ~i ~ y ~_;, Marisa Lawhnn -~ 2233 Martin, Unit 120 ,~ ~ ~ ~ ,~.~ lrv~n A 92612 ry,~. e C } 4 ~ $ 14 ' *P8. Recorded by: (Name, i ~ 't ~# ~ affiliation, and address} ~r;;~,:~,-~ ~, ~ A Andrea tJrbas, M.Arch., AICi' Kleinfelder , . ~-" ~ ~ a x ~ "°~ z, '~ 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ~' ~ Redlands, CA 92374 rr,~ ~ ~ti ~ ~ s ~ *P9. Date Recorded: ~r. ''"~~'~ ~ .., ~ _ nN November 5, 2007 M f~r~ ~ s ~~~~~~~~'' ~y~~ i *P10. Survey Type: (Describe} b~ ~ ~ ~,~~~.~~~ C E QA -W it son i l I~.1R *P71. Repatt Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson II l=lementary {UR5 2005) "Attachments: ?NONE ?Location Map ?Sketch Map C~iContinuation Sheet (B~€ilding, Structure, and ©bject Record ?Archaeological Recorci ©Distriet Retard ?Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ©Artifact Record ?i'hotograph Record ? Other {t.ist): DPR 523A (1195) *i2equired Information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OP PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 6U *Resource Name or # {Assigned by recorder} Bonita Gardens, Lot 03 61. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, G.ot 03 B2. Common Name: 256D N. F Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 63. Original Use: Residential Dwelling i34. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *t35. Architectural Styie: Eclectic Period Revival Cottage *66. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations} Originally constructed in 1932; black wall {211 711 9 7 8); Eft high block wall along side property lines (31712006) . (Source: City pf San Bernardino Building Services Department). Modifcation to windows and porch (post 1995 URS survey) {source; visual inspection} *B7. Moved? C~No ?Yes ?Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: B9a. Architect: Unknown. BSb. Builder: Unknown *69t). Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: N!A (discuss importance in terms of historical ar architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity,) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Pian (2D05) Regional Culture (9917 9545). As described within the adapted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,OOD. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block nn W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in '1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings tank on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Gasa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Outer public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 an Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned far the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuation Sheet. IB11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *B72. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson} Tract sANBERNARDINOCt1'YUS£7 Wf I.SOt~i I! 'rLEME:NTRRY SCHdOL 5n'E Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino PROPERTY OWNERSHIP CHAP General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ,,_,, ~, _ _~Q Research Associates) i z°,R '~i° srnr"er u ,~, -- ,<,n B93. Remarks ~ o R ~ o _ _ a This resource is located within the proposed development area for the ° a~..v~,Mei ~ . ~ ~ ®,° & ~ ~% Wilson II Elementary Sehaol Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to t p ~ e° '° ~ " ~ q ~ ~ Lf a u~ " CEQA. .-~ ~ a ~ @° @D.~ n ~ ~ 0 72 4 ~ *614. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ eT ~ R *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 O ~ ~ °_n ~ ~ ~--~. ~~I , a //~~ ° x RA.4e~ @8 RE R #F' L ~ i° S ,•'ICY bL4 ~ ~ ~ p @O @@ Q ~ ~ a ®t° ° p c ~ ~~~ar,2dfro l.- •----~.. • Rh.., .., VR Mt Gti f exx ee4 i ....!Ae.....!~?.. '~ {This space reserved for affcial comments.} ~ a q ~ o i ~ ~ , s a ~ a ~ o I K s R € o ~ yt]]p ' - i QR `s~ Cx Cis C ~ C` OK Cp O` ,; i. sa °o : a° n a° a° as sa az ai so 1~'~ Vncsri LeM gnJa FOnxir~:iAprx (SiRI ~ Onvm OOn79aC Fncura LOCe'b~ ~ ~tmfaE '., l~xz'[ State of Galifornia--The Resources Agency Primary # CJEPARTMENT bF PARKS ANC] RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Nart~e nr # 2560 N. F Street, San (3ernardino/ Bonita Gardens, C_ot Q3 *Reearded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *C~ate: 1't15107 ~ Continuation ~ ilpdate Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first MaDnnalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 7940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base an the grounds of the San 13ernardina Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route fib was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Manisa between 1526 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled aver the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial 8~ manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved an May 22, 2928, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented In the tract include eclectic Interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The Intl measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 95fl square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, Including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (tot 32), and it Is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1926, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 9927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25"' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (tot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did oat commence again anti! 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950x: lots 8, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These Einar: homes, although constructed nn similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a. citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations far the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the Identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period.,.". This building was constructed in 1932, as part of the original tract design, the recent madifieatians have resulted in a compromise to the building's historical integrity. As such, it is a nancnntributnr to the Bonita Gardens Tract potential historic district. i3PR 5231 (1195) "Required information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTIIlI~NT OF PARKS AID RECREATION HRI # P~[~~,~~ ~E~i®~® Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6U Other Listings nfa Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource game or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 02 P1. Other Identifier: 2572 N. F Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Nat for Publication d Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Lernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; °/s SE of '/4 SE of Sec.28; San Bert~ardtno B.M c. Address: 2572 N. F Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN (G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-173-03-0-000 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single-family residential dwelling ariginatly constructed in 1939. The building is asingle-story, aluminum or vinyl sided, wood_framed structure with a hipped roof. It is square in-shape, and incorporates approximately 1,516 square fee# in area. The primary elevation consists of three double-hung windows with fixed shutters, of varying dimensions. The furthest left has aone- over-one configuration. To its right is an entrance Boar with a small stoop and shed root; followed by Gone-over-one double-hung sash, and finally atwo-over-two double-hung unit. This dwelling sits nn a 0.1504aere parcel. This building has been significantly modified. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources present. BBuilding ?Structure ?Object ©Site ?D'€strict ?Element of District I~Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required far buildings, structures, and ob'ects. P5b. Description Of Photo: (V€ew, date, accession #) . :`"_ ~ ` ~ View of the southeast comer of the -~ -'~~< '~' building; taken 1012312007; digital. << *P8. Date ConstructedlAgeond Sources: !?lHistoric ?Prehistoric ?Both 1939 (URS: 2005 Da#aQuiek) ~ ~ ~ *P7. Owner and Address: " , ~ Stran (trust) ~ ~ ~ ~, 1-~- t t +~~--~.~." ~ ~ 2572 N. tw Street : ,~, ' u ~ ~ y .:~,~ San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~- ~ 4~3 , ti t: a-°~r arri~ µs"i? rte y. t.,,, - ~ ~ H S u w'ok' +1 1 lr Yf~:~~n j rv r ~r~,_,.:~-, ~ '~ - a~°~ °-'~' ~r ~, *P8. Recorded by: (Name, '~'~- ~~yVk ~ ~ affiliation, and address) ~,`-~,..~..~--i ~ ~ ~ . Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP '-"' s..,, h ~ Kleinfelder 1, 1220 Research Dr., Ste B Redlands, CA 92374 *P9. Date Recorded: ~w~~ November 5, 2007 " ,.:~ "`~'~ *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) CEG2A -Wilson 11 ElR _a *P11. Repork Citation: {Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") -San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (L~analdson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quiek; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMNt] Wilson ll Elementary (URS 2005) *Attachments: ©NONE ?Location Map ©Sketch Map C~Cnntinuation Sheet ©Building, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaeaingical Record ©District Record ?Linear Feature Record ?Mill'€ng Station Record ©Rock Ark Record ?Artifact Record ?Photograph Record ? Other (List}: DPR 523A ('1195) 'Required information State of California--The Resaorces Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATfON HRI# BUS,®!li[(~, S°TRtJCTUR~, ~4ND ®BJECT RAC®RC~ Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Cade 6U *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 02 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lat D2 B2. Common Name: 2572 N. F Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 63, original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Eclectic *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, aiteratior~s, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1939; modifications to original plan (n.d.} and windows (post UR5 2005 survey) (source: visual observation) "87. Moved? QNo ?Yes ?Unknown Date: Original t.ocation: *B8. Related l;eatures: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *810. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property 'T'ype: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architecture[ context as defined by theme, period, and geographic soope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2D05} Regional Culture (9997 7945). As described within the adapted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- def€ned regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 9930 the population grew from 18,D00 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center care to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the dnwn#nwn were remodeled nr replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Cnurt Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store bath built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the 13epression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administratinn (WPA} funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mnuntain View Avenue, and the San Bernardinn Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 193Ds, ttte Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005}. See: Continuation Stteef. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes anct cedes} HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) SAN BERNARO[3J6 CrrY U5[l *812. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract ~~LSPRO~pERTYOWNEF't5HIPMAPS~ Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino L , General Plan (2DD5), and Appx 13 Histnric Context San Buenaventura ~ ~ ~,k -;- r ~ ° - ° Research Associates. l ~ u~N~~ R. to ~ LL~ ~ ~ o pWta , ~ ,~ ~ °'. 813. Remarks: ,~~~, ~, ` ~ ° ~, This resnurce is located within the proposed development area for the ~ ° ~,~ es to ~ ~,,~„ ~ ~ ° p " ~ ,~~ it' W!++ ikon ll Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ °N pea ea p ~ ° ~ ~ ° ~~~~~~P . n R ~'~,. l.i EQA. ~ s~.,~, ~ a.c a ~, ~,pl. !E 8 ~' 1 ~i,K?.t?~: k, w ~~RArtewax t E1 *614. i*valuatar: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AIGP t ~ ~~~.o-- ~" ~ ~-..9. „ R , *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 r o eo ee o "~ a ~,..s a o u ~ ~ t O scum i d3ak ~ ~ MW P ~ ~t (This space reserved for ofFcial comments.) ~ ' E°/`E "' ""' °" `"..." aw . 9n b' ~ C Ob Ca ~ C` O C° G O` .i .e u ~ as n as ea as a~ 3t x1 m 17, `fnunt lard &i~~ld FpMM kyybrx {$FA) ~p aesrar>lurFkd V1 Re50~Rf {OCf!G!1 a N°~ _ _ . Y~ Vaw~i State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARi<5 AN[3 RECREATION NRI# C4NTINUATIE7N SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resaurce Name ar # 2572 N. F Street, San Bernardino! Bonita Gardens, Lot i)2 "Retarded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *C}ate: 9 416107 ®Cantinuatinn ~ Update Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McAonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,OOfl was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War ll, the development and expansion of Marton Air Fnrce Base nn the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1928 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled aver the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to f=ifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: wand frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways rnnvie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. '° gonna Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 {lot 32}, and it is assumed that this building served as the model hams. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by Int 30 in 7925, and Int 18 in 1925. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25t~' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great pepression» Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three Tots in 1932 {lots 3, 4, and 21 ), faun in 1937 {lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 {lots 7 and 11}, and three in 1939 {lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1947 {lot 12}. Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 9947 {lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 In 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 195fls: Ints 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 44 in 1953. These fins) homes, although constructed an similar Tats, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in mare massive, box-like designs. Hrstorrc Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay done and the North San Bernardino C7verlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterini~a #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1932 as part of the 2"d phase of the original tract design, however, the numerous modifications have significantly compromised its historical integrity, so as to no longer be considered a potential contributor. DPF2 523E (1195) '"Ft~quired information State of California---~'he Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT Ot+ PARKS AND RECREATION HR1 # ~Rf~l4~~ Trinomial NRHP Status Gade 3CD Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 01 P1. Other Identifier: 2584 N. F Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ? Not far Publication Q EJnrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Pte or P2d. Attach a Location Niap as necessary.} *b. tJSGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/a SE of '/4 SE of Sec.2$; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2584 N. F Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zane: 10 ; rt~t=/ rnN {G.P.S.) e, Other Locational data: (e.g., pane[ ~, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0'[48-173-02-0-000 *PSa. Description: {pescribe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries} This single-story Classical Revival Cottage is aside-gabled, wood-framed structure it is rectangular in shape, and measures 1,070 square feet in area. The primary fagade consists of a small front gable surmounting a shuttered four-aver-four double-hung window; to its right is a paired four-over-four double-hung window, followed by a small gabled stoop, supported by two Doric columns, providing coverage for the main entry door; and another four-over-four Bauble-hung window. This dwelling sits on a 0.1504-acre parcel. *P$b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: !Building ?Structure ©t}bject ©Site ©District QElement of District ©Other (lsafates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawing (Photo re wired for lau[idin s, structures, and obTeets } ~'~b. I~escriptian of Photo: (View, y` 4 t ~,~ ~- ~~~,j ~ ~ date, accession #) f w " ' ~ aP ~' View of the southeast corner of the '-<^ ~ "`'~` :' building; taken 1012312007; digital. r~ ~ , ~,°'~F,~ , , *P6. Date CanstructedlAge and ' ,~ ,'~~:" ~ Y~:, Sources: C~1Histaric '~'''~ `c' a ©Prehistoric ?Both a~" ~~' ,~~ ~ rt i~~ 1939 (URS: 2005 DataQuick) a~ " ' ~ ~ r~ *P7. Owner and Address: ~ s.r~ ~il.~~ ~, ~ ~r ~ ,~~F~ Betty Chaffee ~ x~, 'sk~~~s~ ~ B50 S. Rancho Santa Fe Road San Marcos, CA 92069 I ~:„K ,' ~ *P8. Recorded by: (i`lame, affiliation, and address} Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP " Kleinfelder 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ~ " Redlands, CA 92374 .~' `"~ ~~~~~R~~~ ~ *P9. Date Recorded: ~ ~ ,,,, . x November 5, 2007 ~ ~ ~ ~z ~ ,~ r~~~, ~~i;; a~",'T ~ ,~,~ ~ ,k~:..~`~s~ .SurV®y T~l'17e: (pBSCfFbe} Y~~~~~ ~`~~~"~'~ . ~ CEQA Wilson II EIR *P91. Report Cita#ion: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none."} San Bernardino Historic Resources- Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (5an Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson II Elementary {tJRS 2005} *Attachments: ?NONE ?Location Map ©Sketch Map QContinuation Sheet QBuilding, 5trueture, and Object Record ©Archaeological Record ©District Record ©Linear Feature Record ©Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ©Artifact Recard ©Photograph Record ? Other (List): DPR 523A (1195? "Required information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANC? RECREATION HRI# ~UIL®I(VC~, STRUCTURE, AN® ®~JECT REC®RD Page 2 of 3 *NRNP Status Code 3CD *Resource dame or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 02 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 02 B2. Gammon Name: 2584 N. F Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *85. Architectural Styfe: Classical Revival Cottage *B$. ConstrUGtion History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations} Originally constructed in 1939; addition (1211211949); garage an (611011944); re-roofing (211811954}. (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *B7. Moved? I~No ©Yes ?llnknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. 89b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: 3CD (t]iscuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geegraphic scope. A[se address integrity.} This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005} Regional Culfure (1977-9945). As described within the adapted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms, Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In same cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block an W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardina County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed, The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. louring the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration {WpA} funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission, Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall an E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. ]n 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005) See: Continuation Sheet. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codesy HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) SAN B£RNARIIIN4 CrrV U66 ~B12. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract "'"s ao~a~L~oa~v~AVERSwPr~rAPSm£ Map; Data {wick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ~ ffi,R --;- sr~r a Q Research Associates.} 1 ~ ° ~ ~r ~ ° int. ° ~ a r ~ rt ~i• ,~~, . ~,~ubrry x........ 813. Remarks: M ° ~(?~Mz~ ~e n r~ r~,, a~ ° ~ ra e n".-.~ ~ aa~ This resource is located within the proposed development area far the ~ ° ~ xa ~ ~ ° i; 'nm~ ~r s ~ " ~i Wilson I1 Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ~ ~ ~p ea ea p ° ~ ~ ®rr: < ~ " ~ ,...., crrxwo *1314. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP 0 tv~.o~"~ N. ". ~,,,~,„ t;~,a_ *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ " ~ r, n w ~ . ~ ~ 1 ° a "ro n one e., aas exs F oui w ~,-~ ~ 6 Fxi ~a ~...o ~" q ~..o y.~ ~p ~R~z~R ~a,~ (This space reserved for official comments,) zerh. ~ `' -~-~ ~ N ~ x ~r su w sd ar xs sa as s~ at ar ao l , r v.cununa sa~~ FervsrFOxxuc(sfr<7 n o-a~o:a~.rke nl ruoauRSSnc~rin ~ ....~.~., State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMEiVT OF PARKS AND RECRi=ATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Dame or # 2584 IV. l= Street, San Bernardina/ Bonita Gardens, Lnt Ct2 *Reeflrded lay: Andrea tlrbas, M.Arch., AICp *Date: 1'[15107 ~ Continuation ®tJpdate Confext Cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDnnalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War ll, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago #o Santa Monica between 1926 and 7937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: wand frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved an May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the Gity in the 7924x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Gattages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The Eats measured approximately 730 x 54 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1933 measured roughly 850 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was sample#ed in 7922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 34 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25t~' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one [lot 10) in 7829, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 7931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 27), four in 1937 (lots 13, 74, 15 and 25), two in 9938 [lots 7 and 11), and three in 1938 (lots 1, 2 and 18), and one in 7941 {lot 12). Development halted again with the U$ entry into WWII, and did oat commence again until 1947 {lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 7948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1954x: lots 8, 17 and 24 in 1954 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homas, although constructed nn similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the arigina! tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 7991, which resulted in numerous recornmendatinns for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion t13, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1939, as part of the 2"~ phase of the original tract design, maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. ©PR 523 (1195) *Required information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ~~(m~~~ Trinomial NRHP Status Code3CD Other Listings Review Cade Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name ar #: BontYa Gardens, Lot 29 P1. Other Identifier: 2503 N. G Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Not far Publication ©Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. 115G5 7.5' Quad: Date: T R '/~ of '/a of Sec ; M.D. B.M. c. Address: 2503 N. G Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 rrtl~/ mIV (G.P.S.) e. C3ther Locational Data: (e.g., parcek #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Eleva#ian: Parcel # 0149-171-09-0-000 *P3a. Description» (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This Craftsman Bungalow is "L"-shaped in plan, with a front gabled roof. The front elevation of this wood frame building is dominated by a full-with porch {pote~ttially a wrap-around) within the recessed portion of the "L", and athree-part picture window at the projecting wing. °l'wo double-hung window flank the primary entrance {within the porch), followed by fwo larger double-hung units to the south (right). Craftsman features include wide, overhanging eaves with projecting exposed rafter beams, and broad window surrounds. An external masonry ch~nrtey (painted) is visible at the secondary (north) facade. In area, this building measures 1,501 square feet, and sits nn a 0.1722-acre lat. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: C?IBuilding ©Structure ©Object ©Site ©District tElement of District ?Qther (isolates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for busldings structures and objects P5b. Description of Photo: (View, ~ ,,. date, accession #) '''~. `~',T ` ~ ~~, ~' ~ '•' '~ View of the northwest corner of the ,1,. ~' buildin ,taken 10 23 2007; di tel. '~~`ic, ~~~- =- "P6. Date GanstructedlAge and r '~'.~ = fi,:.~ ` Sources: C~Historic ~ ~-.,~ ~ ?Prehistoric ?Both "r'" ~ y~,--;: 1927 {URS: 2005 DataQuick) _~~-~ .~, ~ < r <i~ *P7. Owner and Address: r ~'" ~ Maria Gonzalez and l2asaria ~ '' ; F ~ '""~ s ~ ' Herrarte ~a"°- ''`~~` ~ '~„~, ~ ~ ~:,. ~ T~ ~ 2503 N. G Street ~ '~ tv ,~ " San Bernardino, CA 92405 ; ~ *P8. Recorded by» (Name, i ' ' ti ~ ~ ,.; affiliation, and address) ~ j ~ Andx~a Urbas, M.Arch., AFCP ,~~ x~ ICleinfelder ~=-~ ~ h v ~6~,---.- ~ .~- %~°;~' ~,~ 1220 Research Dr., Ste S ~ ~' x ~~`' ~«- -~r~`~ Redlands, CA 92374 Y ~ R. '~ ~ ~"'`'''s,'.,' y'"'~'~° ~ - P8. Date Recorded: '~`~~~'~x~`" ~ ' ''~ ~ 4~, ~ November 5 2007 ~,ye'S' ,. ~'k4ry~~. -`s`4' :spa ~.~„~' ' ~" -~@` a~'".x~'" :zz'~ ~ ~..~a t -~ m~~. ,r , ~~~'n~.~'`~ex ~~,.~, a ,. ~ ~ ", '~~`' "° ~ *P10. Survey Type: {Describe) s ,....._ . ?~~~-..,,~..z , ~ a_,~x.~-~.~. ~~~~~.~.„~~,,.a,e,,.~,.s~,~~:_.~. CBQA -Wilson lI EIIZ *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none,") San Bemardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) T'xact Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of Sant Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 131-Tistoric Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMND Wilson II Elementary (UItS 2005) *Attachments: ~NO~IE ©Location Map ©5ketch Map QContinuatian Sheet G~iBuiiding, Structure, and Abject Record ?Archaeoiogieal Record ©District Record LIL.inear Feature Record ?Milling Station Record ?Rock Art Record ?Artifact Record ©Photograph Record ©Other (List): DPi2 523A (9l95} *Required information State of Galifornia-The Resources Agency Primary # DggEPA[[RT~~`gMgEppNggT~~ooOF P~A°RKSA+N~D°~R[E~gCREApTIpO~N g~ pH?R~Iy# ®~'L6Ji1~16.~q ~ 1 ~~1,~ i VR~y f~l~® ®~J~~ 1 R~I~S~~® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 3CD *Resource Name or # (Assigned icy retarder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 29 B'i. Historic i~iame: Bontia Gardens, Lat 29 B2. Cornrnon Name: 2603 N. G Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling BBC. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *85. Architectural Style: Craftsman Bungalow '~86. Construction History: (Construction dike, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1927. (Source: URS, DataQuick). *87. Moved? lNo ©Yes ?Unknown Date: Original t.ncation: *BB. Related Features: The property is also developed with athree-car garage. B9a» Architect: Unknown. B$b. Builder: Unknown *B10» Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 7922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR3/NRc (t7iscuss importance in #~:rms of historical or archit~:ctural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005) Regional Culture (1927-1945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterised by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 192p and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took nn the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1425 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depxession era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriurr€s at San Bernardino High School and Va11ey CnIlege and to restore the Asistencia Mission. ©ther public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 an Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Eire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built:' (San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuation Sheet. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HT'2 *812. References: 1991. Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson} Tract (Sketch Map with north arrow rec{uired.) Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation EIerr€ent City o£ San Bernardino situ s€rra~oi~a os~ General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura wis.saa~ ~r Ec€~s€t~rreRx ser+ao~ sGr€ PROPEFtTI' ff6glBdERSHEP iihAP Research Associates). 813. Remarks: ~ ~ --____ ~a 't'his resources is located within the proposed development area for the @ ., a zero. -r- 8 ,r, i ~ ~~n Ea rr ''1 r.,~~. r C'7 9 ~ tale m ~,:: Wilson Ii Irlernentary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to CPQA. 1W- t~~ ,,. a *814. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Axch., AICP ~ ~~~„a Ea ~ t•7 ~ ° ~3 9 ~ ~ :AHI.~a -, vcet. ieawn *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ ° o Pa a ° ~ is ° o a ~ ~,s ~~u.,.,,.. ~ "i ° pia e " r< ,K7 V ~ ° !f N 6 y y~ , ~ o l~: ~ $. ~ " ~ l4 r < w.o F ZB 8r ~ t N ~ eb, ~irv~s. ~wuw~ ,.~a..~ za tc p yo-,. A o @ Ee s O {This space reserved tnr official comments.) ~ u,rtMVS~: ~- ~••-86lA. ...,........i..,.,.~.. ~,..~ .cxr....s Hn ..w, rv ,wa.... ~i ..,asa..._fzsgg s,,.._!~..... as.].. phi( Rm~ ° ~ ° 4 ii. ° O ~' n ° d: R ~ ~ ~ G I tl '~VG Wn lJ lI VJ ~'4k~ ~r \Jx ~'lx 4i~ V'1~ ., _._I 1 ~ ~o :a ao as ar ~ ea zs as as ar ao r r , vnuxu snm s„~f~.s,'nFrwvd. sac f~~l 6 nn,nro~yaf - RRr~p;~RgFoaa°n i~ kOfkd '. Q !Aaa.M_ _ State of California--The Resources Agency Prirnary # i]~PARTMENT OF PARKS ANC7 RECREATIaN HRi# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 ~Resaurce Name or #2503 N. G Street, Sari Bernard.inn/ 13o~~ita Gardens, Lot 29 "Recorded by: Anar~a urbas, M•Arch., Aicr *Qate: 17./5/07 Continuation O Update "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDanalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 4D,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War II, the development and expansion of Norton Aix Farce Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 192b and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, eomanexcial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpxetatior~s of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The iota measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and tl~e dwellings, constructed between 1422 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedxonzns and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot b}, followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion a£ 11 homes, located primarily long 25~ Street Three additional Names were constructed in 1928 (lots 2b, 28 and 39), and one (tot 1t)} in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in ?.937 (lots 13,14,15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950sa lots 9,17 and 24 in 1960 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed nn similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligil7ility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous xecnmmendatinns for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant ox a contributor to any of these classifications. palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this properly. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the aistinctive chaxactexistics of a type, and period..."'. This building was constructed in 1927, as part of the original tract design, maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. f1PR 5231 (1195) '"Required information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OIF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ~~~~~,~~ ~E~®~® Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CD Other t.istings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bontia Gardens, Lot 28 P1. Other Identifier: 2513 N. G Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ©Not for Publication Q Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc ar P2d. Attach a Location Nlap as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Date: T R '/a of '/a of Sec ; M.U. B.M. c. Address: 2513 N. G Si~•eet City: Saz~ Benlardino Zip: 92405 d. IJTM: Zone: 10 mEl rriN (GP.S.) e. Other Lacational Data: {e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate} Elevation: Parcel # 0149-37i-10-0-000 *P3a» Description: (C~escribe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, nnndition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries} 'This building is a single-story wood-framed, "L"-shaped cottage with across-gabled roof, and Classical and Tudor Revival Features. The projecting front gable o£ this clapboard-clad dwelling is defined By a rectangular, louvered window, centered above a three-part picture widow. The Front £a~ade is dominated by a full-width porch supported by Doric pilasters within the "L".The primary entrance is located at the "L" with another three-part picture window located to its left. It measures approximately 1,281 square feet; and sits on a 0.~ 722-acre parcel. "P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: I~JBuilding ©Structure ?Object ?Site ?District IJElernent of District ?Other (Isolates, etc.} P5a Photo or Drawin (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, • ~ date, accession #} '~.. View of the northwest corner of the ~ ~_, building; taken 10/23/2007; digital. '* ;, ~%.- f; ;;~~,4 *P6. Date ConstructedlAgeond - ~ ~ ;fir Sources: ©I-listoric ~ ~' ~ ?Prehistoric ?Both '' '~~' ` '~"~. 9 928 (URS: 2(105 DataQuick) ~~-~;~ ~.~~,.~~~ *P7. Owner and Address: '~~" ~"'~`_~° ~ ::-~ SaIvador Ramirez ~ ~-~ 635 W. St~~ Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 e^i ~ ~ *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address) Andrea t]rbas, M.Arch., AlCP 1Qeinielder 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ledlands, CA 92374 *P9. Date Recorded: November 5, 2007 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) CEQA Wilson TI EIR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; l-listorie Preservation Elemer€t City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (5an Buenaventura Research Associates 2f705); DMND Wilson II Elementary (tITLS 2005) *Attachments: ?NONE ?Location Map ?Sketch Map (Continuation Sheet f~Building, Structure, and Object Record ?Archaeological Record ©District Record ?Linear Feature Record ©Milling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ?Artifact Record ?Phatograph Record ? Other (List): DPR 623A (1f95} *Required 'information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# ~~ILDINCa, ~TRIJ~T"URE, ANA ®~3JE~~1° REC®R® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 3CD *Resource Name or # (Assigned by retarder) $onita Gardens, Lot 28 B'l . Historic Name: $ontia Gardens, Lot 28 B2. Gnmman Marne: 2513 N. G Street, San Bernardino, CA 92805 133. Original Use: Tesidential Dwelling 64. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Eclectic Period Cottage ~`BB. ConstPUCtion History: {Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 2928;. Termite repair {10/5/1940;) chain link fence {10/30/1953); re-roofing {10/12/1955). {Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *B7. Moved? ONo ?Yes ©Unknown Date: Original Location: *BS. Related Features: '1'he property is also developed with aone-car garage. BSa. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *B9 Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Typo: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR3/NRc {Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardiana General Plan {2005) Regional Culture (1917-1945). As described within the adopted municipal dacuzxtent, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 2920 and 1930 the population grew £rom 18,000 fo 50,000. 'T'he city expanded outward £rom the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block nn W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both. built in 1927. A new San $ernardixta County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. Tn 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 (allowed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 2927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, same with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration {WT'A} funds were used to build the auditoriums at San $ernardino High School and Valley College and to restore file Asistencia Mission. ©tlter public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and file Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain 'View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on B Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. Tn 1.939 a new hotel was built." {San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Continuation Sheet. B9'I . Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 {Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *B12. References: 2992 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract s~sE~tinaorrvocrr~a~srs Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation P.lement City of San $ernardi~o Marc p~ope~o~RS~ca"° General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context Sari Buenaventura Research Associates. ~ _ ~ -T-- ~ B93. Remarks: i ~ °,~.~ as .r r~.«~„~~ ~ ~ w ca ' r~n " ~' r T'liis resources is located within the proposed development area for the ~ aa..,~~'. ~' "~ n r,,,.• w ° ; ~ ,o t~~ ° fly Wilson 11 Elementary School T'raject; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ r.,,~,~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ " ' ~ f uc mxm ni++,ox _ F *B14. Evaluator: Andrew Urbas, M.Arch., AICP t ~ , °~„r~7 ~ , ~ ° ~, ~ *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ -" ', ; ~- ti~,.a , ,~~ u~,rw .....,~u: rt wx•...wrennui: ,v Y+ (This space reserved for official comments.) ~ ~ " Y` O a ~ ~ a ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ - ~..-E6frc .,N ~,+ rsn cn F, -~ v. w:e wr eroa ,rY.. ~l oII o ~ ~ o ~A a ~ ~x ~ ~ ~" Q~ ~iK ~e CS ~ ~A ® dY __i y i ti ~ u sa as >u n as as sa sj as a, as 1TE Vicr+M1 l~M $'.~RU FmYfR.m'7„m e~Pol Q'Sn5dr9P]SYM f sxareunrtn ~ knrbA iGcctt.. ' State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # BfiPARTMENT OP PARKS AND RIµCR~AT[QN HRi# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 261.3 N. G Street, San Bernardi~~o/ Bonita Gardens, Lot 2& *RBCa(ded by: AndreaUrbas,lVl.Arch., ATCP '"C3ate: 11/5/f!7 ~ Continuation ©Update Canfexf cont. "Maurice and Richard McDonald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940s, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War 11, the development and expansion of Narfon Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernaxdina continued to serve as a regional transpartatian center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and txack routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the compleiaon of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 192b and 1937. In San Bernardino the route xoughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernaxdina. Fotential property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, chuxches, industrial & arn€anu#acturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. Bonita Grzrderts The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved nn May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighboxhaad of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of khe Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lets measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1.922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in axes, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32}, and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next hoarse was completed in 1923 {lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 192b. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25'~ Street Three additional homes were constructed in 192$ (lots 2&, 28 and 39}, anal one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depxessian. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 flats 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 flocs 13,14,15 and 25), two in 1938 (lets 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (fats 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot $}, and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots wexe in-filled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed an similar lets, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original fract, resulting in more massive, box like designs. Historic Significance and E[igiUi[ihf Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide xecnnnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations far the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bexnaxdino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and histoxic preservation overlay zones. This property was xzot identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay 2;one and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens 't'ract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c}, as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and puxsuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1928, as part of the original tract design, and maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential contributor. bPR 523E {1195) "Required 'information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DI~PARTMBNT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ~~~®~,® Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CD Other k.istings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bontia Gardens, Lot 26 P1. Other Identifier: 2549 N. G Street *P2. Location: ©Nat for Publication Unrestricted "a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Date: T R '/a of '/~ of Sec ; M.D. B.M. c. Address: 2549 N. G Street City: San. Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. tJTM: Zane: 10 mEl mN (G.l'.S.) e. Other Lacati0nal Data: {e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-171-11-0-OOo *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This building is a single-story wood-framed, "U"-shaped cottage with cross-gabled roof, and Tudor Revival features. T'he projecting front gable is defined by a rectangular, louvered window, centered above athree-part picture window. The primary entrance is located within the "L" with another three-part picture window located to its right (within a second projecting bay). It rneasuxes appzoximately 1,33.9 square £eet; and sits on a 0.3.722-acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) I-iP2 ~`P4. Resources Present: QBuilding ©Structure ?Object ©Site ?District QElement of District ?Other psnlates, etc.} PSa. I'hata ar Drawin {Photo re wired for buildin s, structures 'and objects PSb. Description of Photo: (View, p ~' ~ 4,~ ~~''~<...', x ~1.,y-~- ~,_ , date, accession #) n, ~ > ~ ,~•~' %~ " ,~_; View of tl~a northwest corner of the; 4 ~ ~.~" ~ ~,. '` ,r ~ A ; ;'•~ rt er~i' ~ = 1 building; taken 10/23/20D7; ~ r ~, "',~ ,' ~,. digital. ~~, .~{.~- duo Fa~ , ` rt - ~ ,~ . *PB. Date ConstructedlAgeond K ti Sources: I~JHistoric r , ?Prehistoric ?Both 1( 4 f i ~ ' ' ~ '! 928192'T (LTItS: 2(Ia5 DataQuidc) ~ ~ ~ ~, '`, ~ ~ *P7'. Owner and Address: L.ee and Christine Krause -, z~~ ~ ~ ~ 2549 N. G Street ~' ` ~ ~ ~ ~ r San Bernardino, CA 92405 S ~, ' ,. ; a ~~."° *P8. Recorded by: {Marne, ,~ . a;- 4 affiliation, and address) ."4 ° , Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AECP r „ , - - K12in£elder 1220 Research Dr., Ste B Redlands, CA 92374 *P9. Date Recorded: November 5, 2007 *P1U. Survey Type: (Describe) C1rQA -Wilson II EIR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson 1991) Tract lViap; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City o£ San Bernardino General Z'lan {20D5), and Appx 13 Historic Context {San Buenaventura Research Associates 2t1D5}; DMNb Wilson if Elementary {L7RS 2005) *Attaehments: ©NONE ©Lacatian Map ?Sketch Map i~Cantinuation Sheet QBuilding, Structure, and Object Record ?Arehaeological Reeord ?District Record ?Linear Feature Record ?Milling Station Retard ©Rock Art Record ?Artifact Reeord ?Photograph Record ? Other (List): 1]PR 523A (1195) 'Required ininrmatinrr State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMI~NT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BULL®ING, STRUCTURE, ~4N® ~I~JECT RECOR® Page 2 of 3 '~NRHP Status Code 3CD *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 26 B9 . Historic Name: Santia Gardens, Lot 26 B2. Common Name: 2549 N. G Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Criginal Llse; Residential Dwelling 64. Present iJse: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival Cottage *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alters#ions} Originally constructed in 1928.. Fireplace (1/10/1977}; wood-buriung stove (12/7/2001). (Source: City of San Bernardi.nn Building Services Department). *B7. Moved? ~No ?Yes ©Unknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown, B9b. Builder: Ui~lcnown *B1 Q.Signiflcance: Theme: Residential. Architecture Area: San Bernardar~o, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: CR3/NRc (piscuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.} 'T`his building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005) Regional Curtture (1917-1945). As deacrbed within the adopted municipal document, "tluis period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center care to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. Tn 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California 'Theater was built in 19.28 Followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this tune, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA} funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1.933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. Tn 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005}. See: Continuation Sheet. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (t.ist attributes and codes) (Sketch Map with north arrow required.} T-iT'2 sam aaer~nRn~r~o c~zr use *B12. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) 'T`ract tivi~soN n EI.E64ENTARY scr~oo~ S[TE PROPERTY OVa'NERSHIP ItaAp Map; Data Quick, Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ~ ~:m sra~r R Research Associates.) ~ --a ' ° - "m B13. Remarks: . r This resources is located within the proposed development area For the r °~~~' Y' ," ~ ° ° ~ E ~ ~,~, °°.a~ cr. .........,.A,Y~Snw r 3'N?f.yb~.,_:,:: ~ WM,la.nw. Wilson 11 Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ ~~,~,a z° ~ n ~ 3 ~ ~ CEQA. I s O as ea O . ° ~ x ° F~ ,x a ~ " *B14~. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., A1CP °~~~,~,a a ~ ,~..A ~'' 'Data of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ t ~' ~ ~ ""`~'~ ~ ~ .' ~, -- ; I s G,~ zrri.~ ...:,., i wx ° fS~~G~.vJwa n.nm' .,.., 11W S'hJVwN S':.w- 0.pWVn "i~ {This space reserved for official comments.) ~ O :a ~ ~ ~ ~ `" ° ~ p ~•G91. EE[JL....xn dIJ Mt ta+.. ~ .a,r ., .,u5 tit.......<:J f.~! p~ R ~ 9 ° N p p +, ° y M ~ C ~ P p R ~ A W ~I , e, as as ~ as ar se se sr .u a, ae sn I 1 ¦N vecmq lxw lingo FraYYRcddnrw (SiRI ~ orma Ocupkd ,y Jff~~ State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT QF PARKS AND RCRATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinorniai Page 3 of 3 "Resource Name or # 2b49 N. G St~•eet, San Bernardino/ Bonita Gardens, Lot 26 *Recorded by: Andr@a urban, M.Arch., AICP *©ate: 11/5/Q7 ~ Continuation ©tlpcfate Context cont. "Maurice and Richard McDpnald opened the first McDanalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 1940x, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of Waxld War 11, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base an the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th cenkury development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and ].937. In San. Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and dawn Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, mast of Route 66 has been. replaced by the 1-15 in Sawn Bernardino. Potential property types usithin this car~text include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. •' $onita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved nn May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920x. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpreta#ions of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 50 feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five roams, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assunn€ed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 {lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1926. The primary canstxuctian tank place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25a' Street Three additional homes were constructed in 192& {lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (lot 10} in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 {lots 18,14, 15 and 28), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 {lots 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 {lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. "The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 195[?s: lots 9,17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar fats, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, xesuliing in snare massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations far the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead. Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were tv the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National legister Criterion: (c}, as it "errsbodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..:'; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1928, as part a# the original tract design, maintains adequate historical integrity to be considered a potential cantribu.tor. DF'R 523E (1195) "Required information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANA! RECREATION MRI # Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6U Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name ar #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 25 P1. Other Identifier: Proposed Wilson II Elementary School Project Area *P2. Location: ©Not for Publication ©Unrestritted *a. County: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc ar P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. 118GS 7.5' Quad: San t3ernar•dino North Date: T.1 N; RAW ; '/a SE of '/4 SE of 3eG.28; San Semardino B»M c. Address: 2559 N. G Stree# City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mEl mN (G.P.S.) e. Other LpCational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: Parcel # 0149-471-12-0-000 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. include design, materia€s, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is an Eclectic Period Revival single-story "L"-shaped cottage, wi#h crass-gabled roof. The projecting front gable of this woad framed, aluminum or vinyl-sided dwelling ,is defined by a small rec#angular, louvered ventilation window, centered above a bay window. A porch within the "L", has been infilled #nr a room addition (containing a small double-hung window), leaving only the north Corner of the shed-roofed porch intact. Measuring approximately 1,494 square feet; this building sits on a parcel totaling approximately 0.1722-acres. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: C~JSuilding ?Structure ©Object ©Site ©District DElement of District ?Other psolates, etc.) PSa. Photo or Drawing (Photo required ror buildings, structures, and objects.).. PSb. Description of Photo: (View, -..-~,~~;~,{ ,.~_: r date, accession #) '~ View of the nor#hwest earner of the :~>,'~~*°u building; taken 10123!2007; digital. 'F:r~ '~~~' *PB. Date ConstruttedlAge and . ~~~`=`:,~"~'~" ~ t~ Sources: ©Flistoric ©Prehistoric ©Both ~'~' `'" 1937 {DRS: 2005 DataQuick) ~, iy ~5~; ~r ~ ' s rw, ~ 'fir ~ tom''~ *P7'. Owner and Address: z ,-may ~..L Morlan and Helen Kerr ~ ~ s f ~ 2563 N. G Street rs y ' San Bernardino, CA 92405 p ' --~~ _ _ - '~1 Y' *P$. ReGOrded by: (Name, ~ „,~- ` y~~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ affiliation, and address) ~ Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP ~- '~ - ICleinfelder s ~ ~~-~ ~ ~ ~,~ 1220 Research Dr., Ste B ;~-.~--~ ~ ~ Redlands, CA 92374 r'~ r~. ~~f. ~ v *P9» Date Retarded: ~-,., . ° F.~, November 5, 2007 ty *P9 0. Survey Type: (Describe) ~'' GEQA--Wilson II ElR w,, ,~, -- ~F ~"'~a,.:: *P91. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005), and Appx 13 His#oryc Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 20(15); DMND Wilson II Elementary (DRS 2005) "Attachments: ©NONE ?Locatinn Map ?Sketch Map QContinuation Sheet QBuiiding, Structure, and Object Record ©Archaeologieal Record ?Dis#rict Record ©Linear Feature Record I~Miiling Station Record ?Rnck Art Record ©Artifact Record ©Photograph Record ? Other (List): DPR 523A [1!95) *Required information State of California--W The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRl# BUILDING, Sl°RUCTlJ1~.E, ANA ®~JECT SEC®Fi® Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Cade 6U *Resaurce Name or # (Assigned by recorder} Bonita Gardens, Lot 25 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 25 B2. Common Name: 2559 N. G Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Driginal Use: Residentia[ Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residentia[ Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Cottage Style (eclectic revival -Tudor- Spanish) single-family residential structure. *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and dafe of alterations) Originally constructed in 1937; however, na original building permits were available for review. Re-roofed hawse with composition shingle roofing an 6f26l2003. (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services Department). *B7. Moved? [~No ©Yes ?lJnknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: The property is also developed with a one-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *B7(f. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Signifscance: Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005) Regional Culfure (9917-1945}. As described within ttte adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. Tlse city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate #his growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercia3 buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardina County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, some with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration {WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Nall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005) B'19» Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (Sketch Map with earth arrow required.) HP2 SAN BERNRRDINO CRY U56 wlLSO{~f II lrLEM:EN7A12Y SCHOOL SfTE *812. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson) Tract Prto~~~rTYOVUNSSS~+t~r~wp Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Elament City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context San Buenaventura i e ~';'" '~' escort ssoeiates. I ~ ~ _ ~ ~1.3. Rerriarks: ~ 6~..~~xt~ re GS..:F p ox.Q ru ~, ~nc a ~ This resource is located within the proposed development area for the ~ ~~»m~ E' ~ ~ ~u~n t " ~-~u: ~ ". a n ~' Wilson ll elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ~ a ,r ~ . p° `°,0. ° ~ ~ ° ~" ' ~ g CEQA. _ ° a *874. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP I ~ 3~~ 0`~ ~ ~a' 6~ ~ ~'"° "'~' 'Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ° ° s. :, " ~ ~ .',,° ~ n ° ~ ` x ~ ~ W,~~ e . ° Q zo ae O ° ~ ~ ,e a C~7 _ R aw ~,~ (This space reserved for official comments.) ear ~~~' - "' µ ~ Cu ~ dx ry ~'~ ~ 1, a sa ra, as xr sa ea 7D1 A! M }ff Eri , Ye~yt(aM ff~sG YMRrn'dnw l3F'2i ~ OnwrOarEkd /` "rsrs~n: row:a+ A WoACa ' ~y. i•.rtart State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DI=PARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3Resource Name or # 2559 N. G Street, San Bernardino) Bonita Gardens, Lot 25 *Reeorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *Date: 1'115107 Continuation ~ Uplate Context cont. "Maurice and Richard Mct3onald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 194fls, one-quarter of the City's populat9on of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, wifih tl7e advent of World War ll, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airpnrt rapidly replaced the railroad as the city's leading economic contributnr. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the autmm~bile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled aver the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street #a Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in San Bernardino. Potential property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved nn May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 192fls. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The Ivts measured approximately 130 x 5fl feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five rooms, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1822 {lot 32}, and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6}, followed by lot 30 in 1925, and lot 18 in 1925. The primary construction tank plane during 1927, with the completion of 14 homes, located primarily long 25~h Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39}, and one (lot 10} in 1929, prior tv Bleak Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 4932 (lots 3, 4, and 21 ), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25}, two in 1938 [lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19~, and one in 1941 (lot 42}. Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8}, and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled In the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 4fl in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar lots, did oat cantinas the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Signi#eance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Annaldsan conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 199'1, which resulted in numerous recommendations For the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant ar a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposal to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay done and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Treat, is at least Sfl years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as It "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period...", and pursuant to California Register Criterion #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period...". This building was constructed in 1937, as part of the third phase of the development of this tract' Flowever, since it has undergone numerous modifications which have resulted in significant compromised Integrity, it is not considered a contributor to the potential historic district. E3PR 523E {1195) "`Required information State of Cafifornia---•-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION NRI # P~~~~~,~ Trinomial NRHP Status Code fiQ Other listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, Lot 24 P1. Other Identifier: 2573 N. G Street, San Bernardina "P2. Location: ? Not for Publication D Unrestricted *a. Gounty: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: San Bernardino Nortk~ Date: T.1 N; R.4W : '/a SE of '/a SE of Sec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2573 N. G Street City: San Bernardina Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.} e. Other Lacatianal Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate} Elevation: Parcel # 0149-179-93-0-OOD *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, a4teratinns, size, setting, and boundaries} This is a single-story wood frame past-WWII Tract home, with a hipped roof was originally constructed in 1950. It is "L"-shaped in- shape, with a clipped corner resulting in ashed-roofed recessed parch with the entrance door and tripartite picture window. This sued roof is supported by latticed posts. In area, this dwelling incorporates approximately 993 square feet, and sits on a 0.1722- acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes} HP2 *P4. Resources Present: l~Building ?Structure ?Object ?Site ?District ©Element of District ?Other (Isolates, etc.} PSa. Photo ar Drawin Photo re uired for buiidin s, structures, and ob'ects. PSb. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) View of the northwest corner of the t,'. `..;,f: building; taken 10123!2007; digital. . ~ '`P6. Date ConstructedlAge and .`~'~: ~~~~~'.~`: Sources: C~Historic ' S~,~k ~". • = ©Prehistaric ©Bath y 5 At J~C ~~~`' '-; ",y '~ "~~~~`" y 1950 {URS: 2005 DataQuick} `'~ '~ - , : '~ t ~ *A7. Owner and Address: ',. r~ t~~,~~~~. ; ~ ~f~x~~a, David Onei! and Norma Williams ` Y • '" ~, ~ ~ 2573 N. G Street San Bernardino, CA 92405 ~ t """'"' P8. Recorded by: (Name, r ~ affiliation, and address) _ '`" ~ "~ Andrea tJrbas, M.Arch., AICP ~ b ~,,, Kleinfelder 1220 Research Dr., Ste B sw a ~ x~~ b 2 ~`"'~ ~- Redlands, CA 92374 -• ~ ~T~t k z ^~,nS yy w~:,;t"w.~x `P9. Date Recorded: November 5, 2007 • ~'~.- zE ,~ *P10. Survey Type: {Describe) ti ~E ~' ~ CEQA 1Nilson ll EIR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and ati~er sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991} Tract Map; Data Quick, Historio Preservation Element City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005}; DMND Wilson ll Elementary (URS 2005} *A#tachments: ?NONE ©Location Map ©Sketch Map QCantinuatian Sheet CBuilding, Structure, and Object record ?Archaeolagical Record ?District Record ?Linear l~eature Reeard ?Milling Station Record ?Rock Art Record ?Artifact Record ?Photograph Record ? Other (List}: ©PR 528A {9195) `Required information State of California-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILD[N(3, STRLJ~Tt~RE, AeND ®BJE~T REC®RD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code 6U 'Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lnt 24 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 24 B2. Common Name: 2573 N. G Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residential Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Past WWII Tract *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1950; however, nn original building permits were available for review. Installed solar water heating system on 12/3011981. (Source: City of San Bernardino Building Services bepartment). *B7". IVloved? QNo ?Yes ©tlnknown Date: Driginal location: *68. Related Features: The property is also developed with a two-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown. B9b. Builder: Unknown *B70. Significance: Theme: Residers#ial Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Property Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Criteria: NIA (Disnuss importance in terms of historical cr architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope, Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan (2005} Regional Culture (1917-1945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural #erms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,000 to 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Black on W. Court Street, the Anderson Build"ing and a new Harris Company Department Store both built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed by the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings tank on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Casa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 1930s new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, same with New cal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High Schorr! and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during #his period were the Department of Public Health and the Publin Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 1933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned fvr the second time. In 1939 a new hotel was built." (San Buenaventura, 2005) See: Continuation Sheet. 877. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codas) HP2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) SAN BERNARC71Np crxr USr! *B12. References: 1991 Reconnaissance Survey {Donaldson} Tract ~'LPROPERTYOWNERSHEPM1AP54~ Map; Data Quick; His#oric Preservation Element City of San Bernardino a General Plan {2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ s z~+a _r.. srn~r R R ,.- Research Associates}. i ~ " ~ Es „ rr, ° ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , t , or4~ .ne„ un.a~..,........ ........,...ecw ai e6 fB ~ q ~ ~ ~ 1! a ll ~ ~,. This resource is located within the proposed development area far the ~ ,. u.,,, Wilson II Elementary School Project; and is being evalua#ed pursuant to ~ ~ x.~ e8 eo p t ~ ~ ,E 4 a CEQA. ! E~,m ~ © ~ ° Q7 re n ~ ° ~ *874. Evaluator: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP .,- ~ ;o~ o~ *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 ~ ~ ~ ae z, " E ,e ~ {e} a.w:wm irmm r.~..: u u u ,~ Q ea ee fl ~ ~ ~ so a O ~ xr:va JNY. jy 4bYeaMR6-w ._.,.0.G lfm ' ~i ~ 2b~ nt, _...set. ur aw_. ~~,+-ia> _ ar c,r .m (This space reserved far official comments.) M,F • ~ ~ ~ ~ ° r > a ~ Q m ~ ~ r Q t° ...,~ ~ ~M uu ~ OC ~.~''» ram ~' Q, a rr ~t ~ it t6 as }fe ri ' ae as dk as b4 a! an 1 ~ 1 j"~ ~ V~nl.+re S'nrla Fn+i ry tru'+'bnAlBfk) pOAnm MSry«I_.._ . ~~~~~~~a oQa~ , A VataK State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT ©F PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# C~NT~~UAT~~~ SH~E~ Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or ## 2573 N. G Street, San Bernardino) Bonita Gardens, Lot 24 "Recorded by: Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP *©ate: '1'115107 ~ Continuation ©Update Context cant. "Maurice and Richard Mcl3onald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 194fl. lay the 1940s, one-quarter of the Guy's population of 4fl,00fl was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War If, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railroad as the qty's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route 66 was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1925 and 1937. In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west. Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the I-15 in Ban Bernardino. Pote>:tiai property types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blocks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial ~ manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside commercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighbnrhnnd of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the trac# include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 5fl feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1938 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five roams, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 3Q in 1925, and lot 1t3 in 1926. The primary construction tank place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25r" Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39}, and one (lot 10) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great C~epressian. Cfevelapment of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of lots 22 and 25, followed by three lots in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 (lots 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (Intl 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (lots 1, 2 and 19}, and one in 1941 (lot 12}. Cevelopment halted again with the U5 entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8}, and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950s: lots 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 4fl in 1953. These final Names, although constructed on similar lots, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and Eligibility Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classifications. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zone and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 5fl years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion (c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period..."; and pursuant to California Register Criterion #.3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period..."°. This building was constructed in 1950, as such it was developed outside of the period of significance far Bonita Gardens, and therefore is not considered a contributor to the potential historic district. DPR 523E ('[!96} "Req€aired information State of Galifiornia-The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANF~ REGREATION NRI # P~~Md4~~ ~EEi~~~ Trinomial NRI"iP Status Gode 6U Other t.istings Review Gade Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: Bonita Gardens, LHt 23 P1. Other Identifier: 2585 N. G Street, San Bernardino *P2. Location: ? Nat for Publication Q tJnrestriated *a. Gounty: San Bernardino County and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. tJSGS 7.5' Quad: San i3ernardu~H North Date: T.1 N; R.4W ; '/a SE ofi '/a SE of 5ec.28; San Bernardino B.M c. Address: 2585 N. G Street City: San Bernardino Zip: 92405 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; m1=1 mN (G.P.S.) e. Other LHCational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, eta, as appropriate) i=levation: Parcel # 0149-171-07-0-fl00 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This is a single-story, front-gabled, residential dwelling originally constructed in 1948, as a Post-WWII Tract. It is woad-framed, and roughly "L"-shaped in plan. The projecting wing incorporates a small !Hovered ventilation window in the shallow gable, surmounted over atwo-over-two double-hung window, which in turn sits above a masonry wainscot. To the left (north, and within the "L"} is a small stoop, leading #n the primary entrance. Tn its north is a broad masonry external chimney, followed by another rectangular two-aver-two double=hung window. This building measures apprnxirr~ately 956 square feet in area; and sits 0.1894- : acre parcel. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 *P4. Resources Present: I~Building ©Struc#ure ©Object ©Site ©District C~Element of District ?O#her (Isolates, etc.) PSa. Photo or C7rawin (Photo re aired for buildin s, structures, and objects.) P'~b• Description ofi Photo: (View, ~,~; y,, ;r, ~ .,. , ; ~ date, accession #) ~y~~~ ' ~ ~`' ~ ~;, View of the northwest carnet of the '~ ~_, '.w building; taken 1012312007; digital. ,w~.,= ` ~ ~ *PB. Date ConstructedlAge and Sources: iHistaric ~' r ~ ©Prehistoric ©Both Y~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~,•~ ~ 9948 (URS: 2005 bataQuick) ~ ~ ~ S ~ '"` 3 ~ ~ ,~ ~ P7. Owner and Address: ` ~ ~ "`"~ ~- ~,~;k ~ ~,k,'~ s% Judith Peterson ~ ~ , ~ ~ `'` 2585 N. G Street ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ , San Bernardino, CR 92405 r '~'~y~s ~,: _ _ *P8. Recorded by: (Name, ~k~~~h ~-~ Q - n ~ ~ afifiliafion, and address) s S, ns~ ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ b Andrea Urbas, M.Aroh., AICP ~3. ~' ~ Kleinfetder ~' ~ "~ h.~,'~sa, ~'~r 1220 Research Dr., Ste B r '~, ~ ~ ~ Redtands, CA 92374 ~ ~'~~a~e s -r`, Gy'„`~' ~ ~r ~ .rc ~~a r 3 "~' ~u s~~ *P9. Date Recorded: ~ " JX "`~'+~ ~ '~-~ ~' ~, ~ ~, z..+,~»> f~~~~ ~., i ~ NHVBmber 5, 2017 ~ ~ ~a ~'" 1 ~f ~' Po~+°~€'~, ~~.lr ~ °~' ~r a .emu ~ ~' ~ "~t~, a v~~~,. ~~' ~ ~ f c3 r k c ~:;v'rn""£,:~s~~~ *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) F~'y~~,F ~ 4 ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' x~n 1.~. CEQA W~Ison ll EIR *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey (Donaldson 1991) Tract Map; Data Quick; Histnric Preservation Element City of San BemardinH General Plan (2005}, and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura Research Associates 2005); DMNtl Wilson II Elementary (URS 2005} *Attachments: ©NONE ?Lnnation Map ?Sketch Map QContinuation Sheet L~iBuilding, Structure, and Object Record ?Archaealagical Record ©D'€s#rict Record ©Linear Feature Record ?Mllling Station Record ©Rock Art Record ©Artifact Record ©Photograph Record ©Other (List): bl'R 523A (1195) *I2equired information State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AN© RECREATION HRI# ~3UILDING, 5T`RtJDT'URE, ,AN® U~JECT' RECt~RD Page 2 of 3 *NFtHP Status Code 6U *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Bonita Gardens, Lot 23 B1. Historic Name: Bonita Gardens, Lot 23 B2. Common Name: 2585 N. G 5tree#, San Bernardino, CA 92405 B3. Original Use: Residentia! Dwelling B4. Present Use: Residential Dwelling *B5. Architectural Style: Past WWII Tract *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Originally constructed in 1948 ((source: URS, DataQuick) *B7. Moved? I~CNo ©Yes ©tJnknown Date: Original Location: *188. ReNated Features: The property is also developed with atwo-car garage. B9a. Architect: Unknown, 89b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture Area: San Bernardino, California Period of Significance: 1922-1941 Propertyr Type: Residential Dwelling Applicable Cri#eria: NIA (biscuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) This building is associated with the historic context identified in the City of San Bernardino General Plan {2005) Regional Cerlfure (9997»1945). As described within the adopted municipal document, "this period is characterized by the establishment of a well- defined regional image in economic, social and cultural terms. Between 1920 and 1930 the population grew from 18,0(30 fa 50,000. The city expanded outward from the center core to accommodate this growth. In some cases older buildings in the downtown were remodeled or replaced with new commercial buildings, including the Garner Block on W. Court Street, the Anderson Building and a new Harris Gampany Department Store bath built in 1927. A new San Bernardino County Courthouse was constructed in 1927 as well. In 1929 the Heritage Building was constructed. The California Theater was built in 1928 followed y the Ritz Theater around 1930. Many of these new buildings took on the prevalent styles of the period: Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean and Classical Revival. New schools were built including the Gasa Ramona School in 1925 and San Bernardino College in 1927. During the Depression era of the 19305 new construction slowed. However, several public buildings were constructed at this time, same with New Deal funding. Works Progress Administration (WPA) funds were used to build the auditoriums at San Bernardino High School and Valley College and to restore the Asistencia Mission. Other public buildings constructed during this period were the Department of Public Health and the Public Defendant Building, both built around 1935 on Mountain View Avenue, and the San Bernardino Cultural Center and Fire Hall on E Street, built around 9933. At the end of the 1930s, the Arrowhead Springs Resort Hotel burned for the second time. ]n 1939 a new hotel was built." {San Buenaventura, 2005). See: Gonfinuafion Sheef. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) H P2 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) *B1Z. References: 1981 Reconnaissance Surve //I3analdson Tract SANBERNARbIN0G3TYUSn y l ) YcriLSnN II ELiM~ESTARY SCknnL 3ETE Map; Data Quick; Historic Preservation Element City of San Bernardino aatl~aa''"fnwNar~s~~ptnnp General Plan (2005), and Appx 13 Historic Context (San Buenaventura ~ ~ Q Research Associates). ~ e ~,R : - srat~r e B13. Remarks: ° "" ~ "` n s~ ra A n x ° ~ io ens ° This resource is located within the proposed development area for the e""`""""" - • - a ---~ ~q ® Qa .a ~ ° ~ $ ~ rr a n Wilson II Elementary School Project; and is being evaluated pursuant to ft ~vx~: ~.,.,-_: CEQA. I n ° iv... Zd ea © ° ~ ~ ~ fS 4 c i,cnWw vcu>moco-s..: ~c n _ _i s *B14. Evaluator; Andrea Urbas, M.Arch., AICP R' *Date of Evaluation: November 5, 2007 O o ~ '• B.c7 _, i3',, L~. " ~ 2e 2r ~ ~ Fu o Ej ~a r nn ° ~ r M k~. ~ v ,~ ., _ . ° O ce ea a ° ~ ~ Ore e 0 a,, ,.w..~..~ ,~ °.~.,,v.,~ ~w 0 earl. -1 _._, (This space reserved for ofFicial comments.) 6„ ~ ~y . « _-~ r ~ _ tl a 5 ~ ~ G O~ C.. GV G` O~ C~ O" ~ Se as SR d6 d1 dtl ds dr ad df a{ d0 - ~l~r Vxcunlxrd '3n~°fsUYy;~A°:.u'a {9CRY ~6rmo~AdzRIM„,, ., IX,sWrcrtcgnnn a HrsRW,.~. ~V n. S#a#e of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Ri# CONTfNUAT10N SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # 2585 N. G Street, San Bernardino/ Bonita Gardens, lmot 23 *Recorded I,y: Andrea lirbas, M.Arch., AICP *Date: 1115107 ®Continuation ©1lpdate Context cant. "Maurice and Richard Mcl3anald opened the first McDonalds' hamburger restaurant in San Bernardino in 1940. By the 194fls, one-quarter of the City's population of 40,000 was employed by the Santa Fe Railroad. However, with the advent of World War Nl, the development and expansion of Norton Air Force Base on the grounds of the San Bernardino Municipal Airport rapidly replaced the railrnad as the city's leading economic contributor. San Bernardino continued to serve as a regional transportation center from the early days of the wagon trains and railroads through the 20th century development of the automobile and truck routes. Route fib was built through the city following the completion of the highway from Chicago to Santa Monica between 1926 and 1937» In San Bernardino the route roughly traveled over the Cajon Pass and down Mt. Vernon Street to Fifth Street where it headed west» Today, most of Route 66 has been replaced by the 1-15 in San Bernardino. Pntentia! property Types within this context include: wood frame and brick dwellings, warehouses, commercial blacks, railroad depots, associated buildings, churches, industrial & manufacturing buildings, roads, highways movie theaters airports public buildings military facilities roadside cnmmercial buildings. " Bonita Gardens The Bonita Gardens Tract was approved on May 22, 2923, as part of the new boom and growth of the City in the 1920s. It was developed as a working-class neighborhood of Period Revival Cottages. The architectural periods represented in the tract include eclectic interpretations of the Spanish Colonial Revival, Gothic Revival, Classical Revival, and Tudor Revival styles. The lots measured approximately 130 x 5fl feet, and the dwellings, constructed between 1922 and 1939 measured roughly 950 square feet in area, and consisted of five roams, including two bedrooms and one bath. The first home was completed in 1922 (lot 32), and it is assumed that this building served as the model home. The next home was completed in 1923 (lot 6), followed by lot 30 in 1925, and Int 18 in '1926. The primary construction took place during 1927, with the completion of 11 homes, located primarily long 25`h Street Three additional homes were constructed in 1928 (lots 26, 28 and 39), and one (Int 1fl) in 1929, prior to Black Tuesday --and the start of the Great Depression. Development of the tract started again in 1931, with the completion of Tots 22 and 25, followed by three fats in 1932 (lots 3, 4, and 21), four in 1937 (Intl 13, 14, 15 and 25), two in 1938 (lots 7 and 11), and three in 1939 (loin 1, 2 and 19), and one in 1941 (lot 12). Development halted again with the US entry into WWII, and did not commence again until 1947 (lot 8), and continued with lots 5 and 23 in 1948. The last remaining lots were in-filled in the early 1950s: Ints 9, 17 and 24 in 1950 and lot 40 in 1953. These final homes, although constructed on similar fats, did not continue the massing and stylistic features of the original tract, resulting in more massive, box-like designs. Historic Significance and B'ligi6ilify Milford Wayne Donaldson conducted a citywide reconnaissance survey in 1991, which resulted in numerous recommendations for the establishment of a historic preservation program in San Bernardino, as well as the identification of significant properties, potential historic districts and historic preservation overlay zones. This property was not identified as being significant or a contributor to any of these classlficatians. Palms Historic District was proposed to the property's west, and Arrowhead Overlay Zane and the North San Bernardino Overlay zones were to the south and east of this property. Nonetheless, the Bonita Gardens Tract, is at least 50 years of age, and appears to be potentially eligible pursuant to National Register Criterion {c), as it "embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period...", and pursuant to California Register Criterr"on #3, as it "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, and period.,.". This building was constructed in 1948, as such it was developed outside of the period of significance for Bonita Gardens, and therefore is not considered a contributor to the potential historic district ©PR 523E (1195) "Required information 18 1111i1~on it Elementary School San Eernardino, CA Area of Potential Effect t ~ ~sr~ ~ ~r~r ~ t- 7948 .' 1960 « ~ w __1950 1939 ~ ,~~ ~ `c'rw' cn J Peterson Sort Bemardlno City M Uarden B Chaffee ,. ~ 1960's 1926 or ^'>f 492$ 1959- ~ '~ n ~ D OaetlUH Vllllllams C Story ~ ~E ":E Parrs ::;, 5ttat~rl T{t k.. I 1937 1939 ~ ea 1938 1932 ~E m use `u~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fiillAKe!7 '~ UAIjYIParra ;'. ~117J~IeGf~ssi~" ....,~+IarlsaY.av~imn,' ru ~, 1928 1527 , ~ ~ 1941 '{952 ~ ~ LIC 1[rAUSO . ~,, F!G 3aenba a ~ ~E ,,.;M CastrolM CoHez ~ ~ . „1,,~ltlafk TR ; r f ' ~ 1937 7948'; to ., p 1 Cecil TR _ ~ ~~~/'~~~ M Haines PIRA Herrera ey ~i 1937 1923 ~, ~ cu ~ ev~ E flacvson RHeltralz '~ 99x8 1992 ` ~ ~ x$37 1938' f ~, ~ ~ ~ ri S Ramirez t CeFII TR ~ E Qadhrsarrln Tycea RIAA,a~eb ; ~ 1527' 193'1 ~, 1927 1947: ~tI ~ ~ ., AR GoazdlefilR:Nerrada, z J,hll! i ;~IfJahnso~N131lamel ~N6Brauri.' ~ tFar_.~_ srs.._._~ _~r~___ ~.~s~ _....s~~~~.. _.~~~~.,... ~ ~i 1927 1953.; 1928 :' 1927! 1927 1927 1927 :1927 .'1927 :'7922 7927 1925 s~ w ; v ~ c ~' ~ vim. ` ~ o ~ ~ N ~ ~ o ro ~ u' ~ u ~ ' '. ~ . 1 , ~ ,... 50's 40's ~- 30's 20's 19 B®I~iTA GARDENS Potential Historic ®istrict . ~ ~~r ,~ ~ r p ~ pay `~' ~ R N~ C~3~ u} 3 Peterson San BentardFno City M ITard¢n ~' B Chaffee.,;; ~ ~ ~ O R M ~' O O ~ dTR ~ OOOneililNWtilFams CSYo 0 q ~' oParra 6Yran' R is six N MfH K¢rr' W,trlParra .,; e~3 ,~IY1J[aclas. Marisa Lawhon r'i py O O ~ `n O R , i "w ,LfCKraus® S fl,G;:Faaaba w ~3 , ,A'l Ca~trolf~I COR¢z LEIIIok TR,; ~ r u~~ ,O R mi ~ . I Cecil TR ~ ,~ lipFnss FfM Hetrera O O;;' i '~ ~I a~aj J Dawson ~ n s~ R 6elFra ~ R R ~ 4 ~O tv I SRam[rez ~Cea71 TR ' ~ E tA~lders~nVO 7yaea ~ ;RIM SeeA , ~r O O; ~ O O ` ~ E ~ ~i -: rs e ro '~f M (3onzalezfR Heriarta J hill ~ M Jahn'soiilM Shamad~ ;%." A1G Braun ;vE K _,. ,~,....,.,....y,. 6t~'r'_ 5i9...,.....~+~... ~.~~3 6a7,... ~~....,.,..64~ .._53~...__fi15 ~'€~ ...,.~t~9._...,,.ts_~~...:' O R O O R ;' 0 ; O :,; R O! R R Q m ~ c V ~ 3 0 m w ~ a ~ u s1 ~ © n x o u~ x to ~, » 1. ~ "' `P ~ ¢' ,.: v d: , ~~4. ~ r i ~ ,., ~ "' - _ a..... _ 9 ...i _,: Contributors fVon-Contributors Wifsan 11 Elementary Sehool Draft Environmental Impact Report December, 2(107 ,Appendix ,fir C~u~N~ty ~®d~ing ~.esul~~ css ~n 0 J N cv b ~ C]- N ~ O ~ ~ .N ~ ~ ~ ~ r P- SNIP ~ Q N ~ ~ ~ ~- hf S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, cUa n ~ c' ~ o ~ d ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ m N ~ O O ~ V N ~ ~ ~ u~r ~ ~ ~ Q ..a ~ ~ U ~ m ~ ~ ~ 7 ? N ~r v o rn n o M M O l1') ts] p C3 ~ ~' p CNJ Ny7 d U] U7 r r [A M fA 1~ N ~ O C7 q 4 Cp C? Q C53 O C? ~ ~ ~ ~ N~ N O tm+ O O ~ O O O O O Cj X CA ~ W ~ N N Q O d' ~ O ~ N d [p 47 O O U ~ ~ O U ~ U ~ Q O O ~ CJ O O O l!] M.. r N 0 o u> ~ m t-- o r- cn m o c> o ~ ~-- O ~ a O ~ ~I1 O O Z lf~ M In t 1 O O Z ~ CJ ~ O Q- -I N m M O M ~ N O 1~ {3 O t+') = 0 0 o~n o o ~ o 00 on ~ ca ~ n~ ~ ~ aI ca o Z ~ .c-. ~ r- Q 2.11 N Q r h d O Q C7 s-- o m O O O p o o ~ d q ~ O (/] q O ~ ~ O fh O a O Q Q O C1 CJ O C.7 O O O ~ eC7- U ~ (n L'7 O O O O O CQ V7 O t~ 1~- CJ ~ f~ h. O 6] m O ~ N N O O O O O O O Q ~ O ~ ~ ~ Zia rs V' CA sT-- O m O ~ ~ X1'3 c7 N O N ~ O O O U' [O 1^ V' A H ~ LL1 ~ ~ ~ O p ti ~ c°7, ~ ~ M O O O O O [O C O ~ LLF ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ Q "~ Z ~ u3 • f/J O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <E ~ ' ~ a -o d ~ c a~ w o a; ~ ~ p m m ~ tii ~ ~ e ~ c c ~ W <cs `m c > co O ~ ~ a ca ~ O o 0 0 0 0 0 ~u ~, ~, °- ~ ~ ~ O ,~~"' N; ~ ~ (/3 fn ~ lq f1) ~ U N N ~ Q vi W w 'a cV ~, ~ ~ H H ~ H ~ ~ ~ = ~' ~ a Q ° ro ce c1 rz r. co ~ o O ~ O O ~ ~ ¢ ¢ ~ ~ ¢ o ¢ a ~ ~ ~- ~- GL, ~ cn . 0U °o °o m coi °o m E] O m o- O = O o N N Ll. N N R. d ~' ~"" ~ ~ ~ ~ f' ~ G C`~ ~ Cam? ~ ~ ~ CC3 a ('JG ~ ~ ~ N N ~ G O Q ~ S p ~ ^.C- 0 ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CS ~ ~ E N u~ (3 .~U ~ o • ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ° 'v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ u~ c' s~n U) ~ sv C7 ~ Q ~ 03 m N @ ~ ~- p ~ ~, ~ m U N N i~ t1i N N 95 4] N N ~ Q ~ ~ N Q ~ ~ xm-- O lZ N ~ <t O O Lm ~- X iil N Ct? (C~ O N 1~ N ih N to p o'> v7 ca O N O rfl ~ ca a o U ~ ~ O U r U ~ p rn o 0 0 ~ ~, ~a ~ ~ N ~ to [7 {L ~' M .- O ~ O C? ~ ~ O ~ O a o o Z ni ~ c~i N E7] (7 ~ C51 ~ c7 ei' Q r O O ~ QO ~ O ~ O N X ~ W ~ 4 4 Z O ~ O o. ppp,,,JJJ C7 ~ c7 lam- N N ~ LO O O O Q ~ c~J O C7 ~ O O ~ p O ~ Q O U1 C7 O Z fn O VJ C) QI ~ ~ C7 ~I ti O C7 CS C3 cS f ~- D ~ ~ O O O O m m m 6Q] ~ ~ V r ~ p) a; ~Y; C7 O~ ti ~ ~ Z7 Z O O O ~ oC7 CA ~ a X O N p1 4] (p ~ Q ~ m O N W ~ ~ o~D c~i7 ~ ~ ~I ~ C V. O ~ ~ Q ~ b O CS p tD ~ ~ [o a H ~ LLl 4J Z ~ ~ ti ti h ~ ~ ~ u~t ~ v i--- Lll Q J Q ~ ~ F- .Q Lli ~ W ~ ~ ~,... ~ ~ m l9 C~7 W N Z Q5 ~ N _ c ~ a ii[ ~ a a ~ ~ lit ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 E ~ O a © ~ CS .o .a .st ~ U ~ -o ~ ~ .a Q ~ C7 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q <L ~ .o .ca ~ O sr Q ~ ~ o ~ O D O O ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ p ~„l Q t~ y : ~ Z co co rn rn ski] tom-- Fa-- ~ W H ~ Md- ~ ~ ,,.,. ~ ...p o c~ ca ca ~ p p m 0. O O o a r ~.(n ~ U N N N N Q F l tl Q F-- ~ F-' (fl U N f~ f~ Q V i~ LL~ Q 7 CJ i~ p o 0 o c~ ao m c+7 r~ o m o rn U oci o:i © ai o 1+ © c~i © m CmO (M4 N r N ~ ~ r N ~t V ~Y C9 SO [D 113) N N U1 07 V ~ c- c- C3 C7 N N N 07 O O ~- r O O O N N O •- O O ~ ~ O M O O a c+7 m O CA Ct p O O O p O O O Cs O? f? O Cs O O O O O N N O ~^'• O O M m O m O CS LL. R7 q_J 0.7 Q SJ C) _ _ _ O Q C3 r O O O O O O O O O O O ? 6T 0] m O O 4 U7 N W Ql SO (O I1~ N CO IX] O CO O N O O aU C7 C? DO a7 [D N C7 C7 c+7 C9 N n n ~ ~ ~ m n N N b r b C7 N N q N q O N N Q N O O C7 M O M O O x W .L a ar cn cn n c~ q cw ca ~ ~Y3 aC1 4f q C? O [O O O n n O ? O O O D O O ~ ~ ~ O O O a_ a. N n c> n n n n r~ n o 0 0 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n a o 0 uJ d o ci n cs a o n r~ cs cs n O cn r~ o ~ ~ O o © cno o 'mY, ~ ~ O C3 p i~ O cV O ~O CJ N ~ N N t- c+? M N :T G T ~ X N N n lt) ~' { O [O p ~ C] ~ N N C3 O a0 cZt b GO ~ Z ~ W~F' O ~ ~- O ~ ~ O ~ O O a N `G G L1. a~ U m rn n v ac+ n ~r ~ n co o m ~ N N O O O 03 m O 07 O O cn In O IS] O C) N I~ n 1+ © n 1"' Q QS N ~ N N LU tU DS w ~ N Q) 61 N ro` 'C5 'C9 ~-- Z a 4 ? ? -~~ RS N Q c+0'3 ~ N N Vl ~ p ~ ~ Y 'Cr' ~ [O O ? ? d CA ,c,,, ~ 2~ C O ~ ~ M N N N ~ ~ © ? ~ p C7 p N Q d j R' 2' ~ ~ O C C C C ti ~ ~ 7, c°~ 0 0 0 ~ ~, ~ c°a t7 C7 C7 . (+7 O ~ U N ~' N -~ ~ ~ E U lp N N N Ql ~ o F ? oo ~ v ~ m C7~, c c c c c#i ~ ~ ~ m ~ m 1~ ? cZ ra ~ ~ a~ m i~ ~ iam u:. m ~ Z m 5 al ~q m > C~ f].. ~ U 1- Q 1~ ~ CY~ M p ~ N iM O ~ O h O cp O N ~ O N O C8 ~ O O U7 p C'1 O C7 p m CC? Cf) N 47 (O LL] L(3 N m tp ['7 N O N 47 a-- q /V q iJd v1 u7 fD f~ N IIl CO h L~F N t~ CS '7 p ~ 7' c1' V N a0 cq ~t '~' N " a0 M ~Q N M N V c~- N O p Cf7 M O O [fl M f O r r a- r r O O (fl CO ~ N r r `~-- N CA t{~ C? '~ ~- O r r O O O N N N q q N N O O O O O ~ m M O q O O -p p [ry N q q ['~ O O O rn rn N N q O h N to Ify O ~ r O O O O O O N N N p O N N O O 'tT O O O I'ry q c+7 q p r r r O O ~ r r O p N O O O O r r O O O r O p r O O c^- CS_ O L7 O O r r O p p O O O C] O O O © O q Of O O O p O t}] q p O O O O O O O p q q q iJ'7 W O 'Ct N N CO O (p O N oU S6 M f7 N N N q0 N M V7 f.O O if1 c- C7 [O C4 N p p ~`') C3 M O ~ c+] c') cV C? ~ r O ~- O O ~ ~ M O O w .- r O O a- r r O O N) In O V' e-• r f~ O Lt9 p LS? cSJ C7 N r aCl N OI [O p ~- p N O N O O M ch c7 O O c+7 r~ N O O <Y r C> r O o c7 O t7 O O r r .- q O r r^- Y^^ O O c')I N O p .- ~- O O O N N O O N N N f.] (7 N tS7 O O O O © (LT O O O 4 O O q O O O O O O MV p O O Q O ~ M'~' O O O O b O p O O O O O O r~ O b O O O O O O O O O q q O O O O O O Q O O O O O O q q O O p O O O O O O O O O d O O C7 O O O O O O O O O O q O p O O O tl~ ~ O O c•3 O O W O N N O M QS CO (O O O LCD 01 a0 O 'd,; O ~ y-- q V] q V ~fJ [D ~' N 6] R~ '~ O ~ N q G7~ r N m C7 ~ O N In c[i r 4 ~'i 7 V' r O M O O O CD Q7 lCj r q (p O ~S] p W N M 4 M M ~ q W C1 L7 C9 h tt7 r np O W O r-» (A Q~ N ~ N O 4 t"7 BLS r ~ N O h N O ~ O ~ O O ctl otl m O O N W I+ O q N atl N c3] b 4'+ d' O ((7 O O~ S`7 ['7 t+ i.[) _ h ~ O h h ~ O O ~ O [O O O N N O O O O ~f] q C3 O N O O p (~- q q 'a' ~i' Y O O V ¢}' M O q W ~ N Q Q q ~ q ~ ~ ~ W Q- O N Kn N p~ m ~ N c0 '~P ~ ~"'" N M cti m N N [*7 N N to N ~ d1 (U Q. ~ 4 O N M CD ~ Q- ~ (p ~ i1- L]. ` O O m O fl O N ~ ~ t~ 77 r a F- F- ~ ai ~ ~ H- p Ca? ~ O O N O L1 O O 7 ap ~ O P ~ 01 ~ O b Y G N N C~ CC (.X O p ~ ci cl N ~ ~ N O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ r ~ `- O O Q ~ ran ~ m ~ m ~ ~- m o O > '~ p O > ^°S ~ N © cn ~ rn cn ~ q C7 C7 U' {.7 °' 'ri, ~ ~ ~r a, ~ 'vs o ~ ~s ran '~ ° ~ ~ "" ~ 'a ~ S ~ ~°v w m m m ~ c~a a~ =a =a v ~ ~ r.» is u is Q1 ~ ~ as p_ ~- d 2 a m cn i~ ii i~ tJ.. fll `6 ~ C,~ h m > ~ ~ op as ~ '~ m m m ~ 7 m al f13 ~ E ~ ¢ um o ~ '~ m E "~ m ~ ~ 1- Q 1- Q F^= Q 4h N ON~,7 407 ~ O C06 i.f) IfJ (A N O O C5i a N a:1 ['h C7 p O b M N N <-- N N C3 b O O D .- r r N O O O O O O o O O C? h N C7 b O N N Q O O O O r ~r-^ O O n n c'~ O O O O O c~ 0 0 0 0 o O b O O O O C7 p p q T oo N M 4 [~J l7 N O n C7 . C7 C~ C3 o C? Q Q W N r n O n c~7 c+7 N 4 o C7 O O r r n O O O N ~ ~ b d O O O C7 O G1 p p O O O r--) n C7 O © D O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 o n o ci c5' c; ca 0 T ~ ~ •c ~ U ~ ~O~J ~ V O p Ca O ,"~- "t7 ~' ~ ~ ~ f O c'7 r C7 ~- ~ (~6 -gyp y ~ ~ n ~ -a w ~ o ~ n m y ~ ~ .c a ~ ° ~ ~ ~ x c -~ ~ ~ ca o ut w °- `A ~ ° II~ M iL] O Cp tf' Cy CS? ~ .Q- p ~' L ~ O ~ O O sfl p O O r W m ~ O O O O n ~ p O O ~ ~ p ro `~- `a o ~ C9 o ro ~ ~ ~ -° ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ - ro a .a ~ ~ ~ tl o ~ of t~ ~ct ca rn u~ cn m n o ° d, m u. r~ o ao ~ co co o o m u~ ~ er c-i o o ~ ~ ca ~ ~ to ~ ~ ci ~ ~ ~ ~ v`ni - ~ a~ ~ ~ ca ~ ~ cn ~ m E a no m a~ ~ cV N p ~ ~ N ~ .N~- N .-. m ° n "'> ~ m cn .s o ~ n as w C7 O N ~ ~ ~ ~ p N N ~ fl- L f] ~ o m vi y m rn Fn o .o .n g y rn u> ~O o c~'~v ~ .r° ~ -a F 1- r~ N m v; y ai m © C7 ~ O A Qt b ~ ~ `~~" ~ ~ ~ C N -Y ~ a m ~ W ~1 ~ 7 ~ n N ~ ~ Y N ~ Y ~ H ~ ~ ~ : ` 0 ~ ~ ~ S` U ~ a ctl ~ ~ N m o ~ ~ cfl ~ r~ 'o ~ ~ ~ c ~ m ~ q U' p '~ u LCj © U © ~ '6 '6 ~ ~7 ~ '~ ? Oi ~ 't3 'O W Q~ N N Q ~- U O ~ ~ ~ (U N m m-° m m m m Q U ai ~ c cL°} o '° .cz ~ ~ ti m ~ ~ o m ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -£ ~ y o ~- r' I- d ~ tl7 m O O r-- N r^ r N 11 h ~ 3i N CS O ° n o 0 n. a n - ° ~ •C T .U 4-- N n~ ~ £7 N L7 {,~ ~ V Ca d ~ C]. ~ O. ~ fl 7 a >, N rn p, L Q ~ ~ ~ ~ c55 :i, - (tl N O. C -O RS O ~ U Q3 ~ O O "CJ O N O O O ~ ~ C1 UI CL ~ L L O N ~ 7, O CF 6S ~, d- p 9, N w ° N ° ~ ~ O wro» ~ U ~ a0 ~ ~ 't1 ~ '6 ~ w6 ~ ~ ~ ~ n N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N n ~ ~ o ~ ~ N ~ ~ v O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ n a ~ ~ ~ u~ `n n a ~ ° in a ~ ~ o ~n ~ m `m ° U ~u o w N N (D 'L7 O S6 © O ~ CO L ~ O p 47 ~ O~~' W ~ 'L7 "CS (6 L O N ~ ~ '6 L ? CIJ pp ~ C C C C ~ O ~ tt5 O N p ~ ~, N ~ ~ U (p ~ ~ ~ ~y Uf N ~., LO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ p l0 (A ~ Q ~ ~ o ~ In o6 O O q O ~ C ~ ~ ~ U trs ~ C N ~ O p C O N N N N N `m ~ ~ r ~ o rn 'a b o o F ~ m ~ -is o m m n o m ~ ~ ~ ~ c c - a, a a, ~ o a ~ o ° -~ -~ ~ p ~ es5 0 ~ o ~ ro m ~ o m m r~ ~ ° m cci as s iv ~ a ~ '~ ° L °o d. cn m ~~cl. ° .i .n .n ~ N ~ Q,, pa ~ ° L O ~ C(J CAF O O ~ W O ~ N Ul (A fn o ° ° ° ~ n m o°a. ° ° m m c o za in rn rn ~ ~ m a m L w M y~ o m =-- a`s io ~ m ~ ~ c •m iu ~' ~ m~ v w w ~ y a m aNi ~ rn °' roi a`tli ~ ° o 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o X ~ .c to ~ g c o ~ c E U {,~ V U is ~ o ~ m m ,~ p A ~ Qf N m (77 N N ~ LO?- ~ ~ C ~ o ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ rU p_ ` O b ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ O v ~ r`t O N G ~ 3 U IJS o E .c ~ n. Ll a~ ~ ~ m E ~ .n ~ a m V € ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' m ~ m a ~ ~ -° N a n -a rn cz. ~ -rs .c ~ ~ r a~ y m se ~ m -~ ~ o L m c -~ rn~ rh c c c `c ro o v c a. ~ ° '~ ,~ a 6y d' o - ~ 1.U N ~ ~ F ~ N ~ ~ W m ~ 11.¢1 ~ W ti ~ a m ~ ` ~ ~ m ~ zz rn N Il. -a c L rn m~ N w- % Q ~ ~ M `m o o m w ~ ~ o ~ as o a> m as o m Qi N o -c3 ~ m ~ o ai w o ~ m w ~ a = ~ c u~ 'o ~ rY [C Cri ~ ~ m ~ o ~ ~ m N ~ ~ m m ~ a ~ w ~ ~ n o ~ m N ai ai ai Ui N h ti n ~r h uz q v ca r. O O O c"7 W oCJ [h O M O rn U C7 C7 O O N r^ O n O In O C{ cp cp N ~ N e~t ~ N V 7' '~ t4 c~ [O LC}I CO CO 03 In V s~ h h M N O ~ ~"? M O O ~Q ~O LD N O O O O O n O O O O O O O O tt O O O ~ 7 q L'r? e7 O N n N N n O q N N O N O O O O O Q O O n O O O O O 0o ao a0 n n c~ v ~ct M q ca o ~ O O O c6 [fl [b O O O ? O O O O ~ O O O O O O O 47 N 07 O7 O (C~ In N O O '[i' ~' O N O O ~(.7 O O (+'i ih O N O O O tt] to to lf] O [!' O r N N O ~-^ a n N N n N q O O O i'j O O O O O O O O O x W QO W (O O O r- l~ L!} ~ n O (A ap Q7 O O O O O O n n b n O O n C] O M M P7 O O O N O O O O O O O q O n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 4p U1 O O O O O O O O O n O n H N ~ O U U C3 ~ m ~ ~I q O N O O O a0 O M N M (") O 3~ 'CY O O O ~ ~ (U ~ O O O r O N r-^ w- - ',~- ~ N N m CY] 4 ~ O N Q Q ~ ~ N O O ~' ~ O T N N ~ ~ N N O SI] CM M lf3 FO O q ~ -. d M cM'? n M ~- O ~ ~ O ~ O O y ~ 'a ~ ~ ~ N ~ O ~n ~ a N N N O O V CO h V V n (4 O ~ ~ N O ° O C77 C77 O OO O O ~[7 ~ Q i.n O O h- h O h O O ~ r ~ ffl ~ ~ C (n _ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~p H m. O '~.:~ ~ N N p W d N N U U a o o ? ? °-- D P ~ ~ ~ N N ill N c0 "~ LS 1- Q (#7 x Ga ca r°i ~ m N n ~' N R` Q' .Y c~ r~ ~ ° o w o o m ° h rn ~ m rn d ~ a~i O Nn ~ ~ C~ x ° q c c c •-- ~ ~ ~ U ~ c m a~ O O S ~ w h p O p .U O» v c6 - N 61 _ ~ k- ? O O ~ W EU 0.7 U? t7 N G c c C ~ z z sn ~ m E m w.. ? ? ? ~ ~ a~ r~ ii ii ii ii ~ ~ ai ai ~ Z a~ ~ w ~ m ~ e ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ o: O E'er ?o iin it M O ~ N h r- O d' O h [fl (O O N V7 O N q W lfj 4 p 1.IJ OS M 4 m d O3 f4 C9 N cO CO I.f) Ln N C+O 1f7 C7 N O [V CO q N p 43 ~ [n CC> h t1) ~7 CO 1~ tV N h 6 'cy' O In ~' 'c1- 'CC N m M 'CY' 'tl' N m L'7 N oO N M N ~ ~-- N O O [d M O O [fl M Cp r r ff? Ip N N r N N r Qi N p h m N p M m Q? N N_ N_ CJ1 N 4 N O O GO Cfl N O O O O O O O O q p Q CS C? 4 4? Q O Q O O O O O O O O O O In N O O m O N O N N U7 N N N O N ~ N O ~-^ O N O N O O O O O O O O p 4 4 4 q o CS C7 p p C] p C] p p O p p p p p t1J r O O O O Ct M O O O O O O O cc~ 4 p 4 p p co m o © p a o © p o o a o 0 0 O O [7 C] C? O q p q p q LJ 4 C7 4 p p 4 p 4 4 CO G7 p N N_ N p ~t ~t O N 7fi L() O m N ~ ~ O N r3 t.() N O p M p N C'9 p p p p p M O O O O O M M O p 4 4 4 C1 p p 4 p p 4 4 cn~ m c7 N .- in r~ v n cn m p N .- m c~ o N ~-- N O •°- O N O N p O .- r r p p .- r r p p r~ p p ci ci n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O ~ V' O O N N O 4 N N N O 4 N p q o 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p p p m m p O O O O O O O O O O O O e^^~ p O O O O p O O O O O O O O 4 O o o O p0~~ C? q, C7 G C5 C] O O O q O O O O O O O O O O p q O p p p 4 4 4 4 4 p O O o O p CS C7 C'] 'cX ~ p p m p O 90 O m N N O i'7 01 (fl [O O O (9 ~ W C? V C? V r 4] CQ G? c~ i[7 u? q7 <f N rn rn L(> ~1; p C7 N O O] ~- N ~- c7 1m C7 N s.() t}~ C7 L'7 V ~ p M V' r - m N •-- •-- ~- r r r N h O m Cf7 ~ ~ p q tri p O h m 4 N N M O ~YJ ~ p a(7 t,h r N p W p .- O] o? r in [V N N tIJ If7 I.n p N N p 6l O OJ O O M M M O O C3 M N O O r r ~r v r r r r r r OO N OJ 07 ~f3 ~7' p fD p W m m h u] r h ~!" O h i~ ~ ~ r O Cf1 p tQ O O N N O O ~^~' O O P7 O r M q N q C~ IN Q ~ o o d- ~ ~ O © ~ cr M O O ~ !gyp !~/1 p ~ d p UJ N NCx, q 4 t3) 4 N Cl ~ ~j N N W ~ ~ ~ N ~ N VJ N N ~ N U] tq Q N N N rA O p p Q1 p .~- .~- CV CR C1 tl Y n o 'c ~ o O Q °' N ~ tY [Y o ~ ac '~y F- 1- ~ ~ 'a F- f- cOOa o ' ~ ~ ~ o L] O O ? oo ° o `o a`s ~ p o `o m` © N N CJ R` R' Y O ~ ~ ~7 ~1 ~ N ~ Q ~ ~ N r r m O O O '.. c~ ar ~ m ~ ~ as rn n or ~ ~ `m rn ~ ~ ~ M {p Q rn Q `a q f!i O C C C r fA O C C C ~ © m ro ~ ~ ~ U~ ~ ~ c c -`='o ~ ~ '~ ~ ACS ~ lll ~ ~ W a 2 2 d. d. N M LL LL LL LL ~ Q? ~ C€I m m ~ D? ,~ II] ~ lY] t~ h a> > cn c as ~ ~ '~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r 4 ~ o ~ .u m ~ '~ a] fL ~ f- ~E N F- Q m ~ oNO u°~ ~ °o, wa., v cwt m r~i o ° a O co c~ N N r ~I r O O O O O O O L7 O O O O O O NI ~ q N O n P O O O Q O CJ O} O O O O O O O O O G? CJ Q c~ c~ o n o 0 0 0 c~ ci ca ca o 0 0 0 tf) 'Y © N [T3 r O n O O O O 0 0 0 0 o c5 cs c~ ci o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ n a n c~ 0 0 0 a 0 0 .Q ,~ U ~ T ~ ~ N C .F'J ~ d w p O O O O O O n .O O ~ n O O O O O O O N N ~ N O Q O © O CS O O ` 4s ~ .i7 O m T In ~ ~ D ~ ~ i7 U [p 7 Q N ~ N tt"-3 y U of N O O "O C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W p ~ iA N` QS in U ~ "~ c CO O O (O O O O N N C ~ 67 Cn 'CY © O O O [p ~p ~ O U N N W V} trs ~ c:i a~ r ra ~-- N to m 7 y 93 ~ ~ a v _rn ~ ~ ~ a> > V ]- N l4 O O f7 N ttf N N il'1 lil ~ O O O ~ ~ ffS ~ C ~ iJ1 ~ U.. ~I r r O O O O O "V ~ ~ o p ~ _ ~ 4 C ~ ?- ,cam- N _ _ ~ O7 0 U ~'- °' m .E ~ ~' u. ~ m ~ ~ ~ T m ~ m_ t~ ~r © N rn ch C] ~ ~ U u m ~ C] m o cn o ~ ~- o a - ~ =' ,~ ~ rY m © © eO c0 o N C] iO p ~ LL ~ ] U N [f? O ~ u7 _ V ~ N y O -~ p "c3 G.1 ~ O ~ ~ ~- m m ~x N 3 •- p' ~ O ~ CL C3 ~ U a ¢ N Q N sU N ~ X ~ tl S'r~. O N C~ 0- ~- Q ~ D N ~ N n U7 ~ ~ q _N O N N V7 ISJ vy in N l4J O Qf O ~ O O N Q N ~ N ~ 7s ~ N ~ -C N ~ N ~ ~ ro ~ m LO ~ .~' [O d- ~ Fq d (n U3 ~ ~" h 6 ~ N ~ lb a ~ ~ t00 'O 1- I- ~ N {- O iR o N t!J ~ N ~ N 1°p N ~ ° ~ ~ a ~ O d D ~U O O - ' O O `-- tl O tl eV O ~ O N aU C~7 d N ~ a x ca U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ irj ~ ~ ~ ~ iri ~ a> `r' `t' iii © N '~ ~ O ~ l4 O r, ~ n ~ N ~ ~ O ~ N ~ l~6 O Cfl N ;-.. ca O ~ S' r ~y r Liz N CS'] CT7 O7 O cD U O 07 N d dl ~ ~ I- ~ f 0. j= ~ ~ N G1.. q N© G ~ ~ O N ~ C ~ p U ~ 07 TJ 'a '6 pl .G 'Ar V o U 4] V ° .O ° .O .O ~ ~ ~ ~ ip ~ Q ~ ~ 3 7 ~ ~ p L] C ~ C °3 C ~ .O r .D G? 2] ~ N f ~ aU N N m c€a uk m Q (.3 o v o~ o ~ ~ o ~ o C O u w 0 C a _ T lII 7 ~ m ~ X O U.~ y, ~ O7 ~ ~C. n C ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ U' ~ U Vl '6 O ~ ~ O ~ ~ N '~. l] N C 4J C ~ GS L C L.L N ~ ~ ~ Q7 C C ~ N "a ~ ~ y ~ ~ ni ~ ~ N ~ W O ~ ~ "~ ~ N ~ N N "" "(J O ,~ ~ ~ E m .n ~ o C3 ~ m m "N ca, a. cry ~ ~, a ~ ~ N ~ ,,~~, ,„~-' ~ ~' E c ~ ~ ~ '3 'fA N ~ N C T Stl N py O a G7 l7 ~ d1 N ~ a. i]1 Qi ~ r!) as -~ ~ m -E C ~ ~ _ ~ - ~ ~ y vs o ca ~ -~ '~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ vii ~in ~ °-~ ~ a~ m ~ ~ ~, ads °' ~ m "~ a ~' m ~ -a 3 rn a 3 '~ a o ~ c ~, to ~ a~ ~, m N "" c ~ ~ 'o rn -a u~ ' rn N = ~ a~'i _rn _ o ~ ~ ~ O L7 a a ~ ~' m ~ ~ ~ _ -y c ~ ~ ~ ~ N m LL ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OS ~ (0 v _N ~ to ;fA ~ TS N ~ ~ ~1 X y N C f] f6 O .~~' ~ Q O ~ y ,~ LL O ~ ~ ~ U f4 ~ C31 n C p~ m ~ ? m ~ ~ '~ o ~ 'r? ~a 'a ~ ~ a~ v rn m ~ a°s ~ x ~ ~- d ~ c"c ~ a ~ ~ ii a~ ~ ~ tL O Q m m n n a~i ~ ~- ~ ~ m Q a ~ m m o m a`~i w¢ K 'S w m as o ~ rri ~~ca ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i] G3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ d ~ C] D~~.. .'~~., N vi vi vi vi ~ ~ d N L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cU W m N ~ ui m ~ ~ ~ m - ~- - ~ ~ a- ~ ~ m N N ~ ~ b Ll. ,. 'Q m N o ~ m °' o °' c m o ar ~ e m o °' o m o ¢ m ~ m v v~ w ~ ro ;n ro 8 m rt a~ o a~ ~ a~ m~~~ u> o w ° ~ i°n ~ w ° inn ° co ° m ~ L° ~ ~ ~ in ~ co ~ v w 'n y ~ © ~ t- F iri I- '"~ ""'~ xr) '"~ ~ sA rn Cn in rn iri ~ ici ~ u'i ~ C] O N "C3 O 'CS N "C7 C N C Lf) C N C N ~ N ~ C] o t~ a p ~ q ~ o rn p a~ a ~ o ~ o m ~ o ~ o ~ y o `'-'" ° 2 2 ~ 2 ~ A ~ ~ a 4 3 (A ~ ~ ~ UJ in u} rn ~ ct m u~ A ~ ° W ~ ~ m _ .o ~ .a m .n ~ p - m in ~n ca n v n ~ m ~ ~ ~ e- `a O `o O `n ~ `n O `n O `o ~ `n O ~ `n ~ n` ~ a ~ `o ~ `a ~ c`a ~ `a C3 `o f1 ~-- ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ti z ~ z ~ cL ~ z 1- ~ a ~ ~ ~ a u.. t~ ~ ~ cr_. d ~ z ri a y O ~ '~ y y ° }' ~ a o ~, VS ~ y u N ~ N - ~ fU C D a ~ C G N sa y o -m m ~ o m c a, ~ .N y y •y ~, .a y ° ~ c ~ ~' ~ o v `" s y ~ -~ y o ~y ~ ~ ~ vs c ~ - ~ T 'm ~ m y <u v y, m c o .6 ~ o ~ y y QS L7i `1 ~ y C} ~dl US N 'y V _ N _ C d ~ C y N {n h y y o ~ ~ ca `n E o c~i ~ o u~i •iu v ~ ° a - 3 ,~ a~ ~ a, ~ .N U ~ ~ C F ~ ~ y ~ "~ W ~ ~ m ~m ~ w m ~ C O C U y U N N ~ lR may- ~ Q1 ~ ~ °O O O ~ y O N ~ o In (4 'O Q~ - y ULS ~ C F O) lt. N d) ~ GF N ~U O1 ~ ~ @ ~ f6 ~ y [5i _ o Q1 ey, ~ ~ ~ ~ m o rn W o ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ U -ro '~ ~ ~ LL ~r ~ o F- c y Q7 ~ d "-' a N ~ y y L.L ~ ~ ~- ? ~ a ~, m m _ O 3 ~ X Gl. ~ LL ~ ,~a ? m ~ ~ j ~ ~ (f1 W N U„ ~ y U ~ ~ ' ? ~ ° ~' ~ eNi a m v o ~ ~ Q o as v oa o c~ ~ y o ~ '~ o• m i~ y sn ~ o ~ ~ ~ o Q 9 ~ its a ~ y C] N N Q O C7 '~ ~ ~ Q y y N O ~ ~ ~ U1 ~ iA . vi ~ to (6 X y 1f) O O [3 Ln N .a L N ~ .C N ,C - .C Q N DS fU N N R! 9J O N U ~X ~ Y ~ Y Y ~ y y L ~ w'C.. O ~ '~ C}' ~ y N~ N lf1 N ~ ~ m ~ m N ° O u] ~ V o ^U^~ Ipn U Q o N Cf CO Q1 O ~ O 00 Cl ~ ~ ~ ~ _`'C.. tCJ ~~-' ~ '_-' i if) C ~ ~ ~ IS] N G N ? T7 O TS N 'C5 ~ O ~ ~ ~ y p u3' N y ~ O ~ N ~ ? O ? Q7 ~ ~ N _ _ _ ~ ~ o o ~ o cYi n ~ v ~ m ~ m ~ m a y ~ °- ~ a ~ ~ h- a F- ~-- ~ °- s r °- r o i ~ ~ a n ~ ~ 4 ~ o 'u~i n o m o ~ ua ~ ~ ~ Pra ~ ~ m ca co ~ ua ~ ~ ~ m ~ tq ~ ~ v ~, v ~n ~n co ~n cn m in xn t~ ~- X X X X X X X X X X ca ~ ~ a O c`a ~ ~ ~ `o O o C~ `o ~ `o O v O `o ~ o O `o C) `o ~ `o d `o L7 `o ~ a u. z ~ z ~ a ~ z ~ z ~ a ~ ~ ~ z u_ ct ~ z u.. z u.. d u. z u z ea o N ~ .N N ~ N .c' ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ U N N ~ O o ~ E R N ~ N 7. ~ ~ tfi a ~ N ~ ..Q N d S7 -~ ~ _N T ~ cn m v7 ~ n ~ E ~ °U' s a ~ Cn m uNi ~ i» N ~ ~ N ~ u, N ~ .E c E N - ~ m E w -a O C,1] ~ O A N O ~ U V N ~ ~ CQ C P~U7 ~ Q1 N f6 ~ A v .N ~ IA U ~ N N [U m N N U N Q G U U ~- C ~ S6r ~, r ~ O -~ ~ C U 'O .E .tCS a~ m m 'N m ~ a E o 'N a~ m ~ IA N ~ o y N ~ y N ~ ~ ~ ~ T N 6f N RI cN- (NU C~71 N ~ CR ~- ~ ttl U ~ m o U t0 ~ US ~ N i6 © N _m ~- p m o ~ F-- csr ~ T c t- m ~ ~E N ~ U m in ~ ~ ~ ar o ~ ~ o L ~ ,~ "O p7 _ ~ N ~ f6 U) _ ~ U R X '""' ll. ~ ~ U LL 7 ~" o ~ ~ O .E p ~ m o p ~ Q ~ _ Q tl1 N ~ N j ~ _ ~ _ ri cr ~ ~ cti ~ ~ ~ o ~ Q o iu as v_ o ~ o o ~ vi `A vi w ~ cn ~ p u~ ~' ~ m p ;n m o ~ in .iif ro tll N N N ~ N U iV ~ ~ Ll ? ~ N U [4 .UC N v ~ x ~ x x q ~ ~ w ~ w m ° ~ ~ ° x ~ ~ x E ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ m X .c ~ ,c .c p m x U ~ d ~ icy °u`i a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ a~ ~ m c ~ ~ ~ `c Q ~ a~ ~ m m N o q aO Iq 40 U ~ O ~ P ~ ~ N OJ N N O N W tll ~ VI a(.1 UY N iCy ~ ~ N 4(3 ~ ~ u7 E N IS! N o cu Q _ d ~ ~ ea ~ ~ C] Q. o a N a ~ ci Ll N O ~ o = p- ~ Elt ~ it] IL LL N LL. N o n w o ~ o a~i ° a~i o ~ o a ~i o m o m m o L o ` o u~ Q o 0 r a ao ua o E in E ~ E cn ~ ~ m tt'ni ? u~ ~y ,n ~ m ,n g' ,n v m Gn ~ ~n dj [V q `- ~ W ~" 05 ~ ~ m ~ N ca T to '-' Rf t9 `- O `' o o `- •- ~ ti ° ~ X v ~ X Ca ~ X °- X ~- c5 ~ ?C ~ X ~- ~ ~- X ~ >C ~ ° ~ X ~ X ~ r ~ `o C7 .c `a C) `o ~ `a O o p o~ 0 0 o a o~ 0 0 o O o~ o C3 `a O ~ r rz ti z t-- tL z ~ a. ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ti. u_ z u. Z ~ ~ ~ z u, z u. ~ u, z u. 2 a -~ N a 0 a c 0 U o~ 3M ~a ~, - ra '3 ~ ~ m N ~ c O ~ C? ~ ~ 7+ N S} tl1 VJ -C~ N ~ ~ N m G ~, N C VA O 07 ~ .LZ N ~ U N O ~ ~ U _N ~ ~ ~ ~ O b ~ N M ~ ~ N N O G N CD .O N ~ N G N O U ~ N C O C O t9 [55 'p ~ ~ p ~ N ~ ~ - ~ i}7 N ~ .N fn ~ ~ V ~ _m .i] C - ~ ~ Sn ~ cn O -0 ~ ~ C C77 _ ~ 6l ~ [U ~ U} L7 A U1 O N ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q ~ O N U N G U UJ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ C N _ U O a ~ ~ Z7 ~ - N fi7 ~ ((f ,N O o i ~U7 N 4f1 N ~ s1! CO.7 ~ o N ~- r C ~ O i0.] ~ O U 'C6 P d ~ ~ ~ y n 7. ~ Q1 ~ ~ N 6] N G 037. Y ~ v T U N ~ N i4 1L 0 Z7 ~ C U .E O RS ~,,,, ~ ~ 27 U a m '~ n w ~ U ~s a `m_ O ~ -- - ~ Iq ~ N ~ N 3 U SO Cis 'O v7 0 ~ _ 3 T O ~ 'a i7? 3q ~X _ _ _ a. O Ln ~ ~ u. m ~ v a O E !l. ~ E CL ~ N ~ 0 C5" ~ m $ G»l N d w N_ N V Q N ~ ~ ~.., - O ~ 7, ~ j, ~ .`U.~ ~, ~ fCi ~ N O N ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ - N ~ ~ O N ~ :O ~ N ~ N r iii r ~ f9 i6 ~ d p O l7 LL ~ G ~ U ~" N p SO d' Cf1 i s °7 n Q o m "ir`i ~ ¢ o y o r °u\~ w ~ o ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ l[? W ~ C7 N to to °~' O w ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ N - CV -a ~ z7 p O N C3 7 o O N Q as o m N ~ R~ Ts ~n 7 - ~ v, N °' trL. 0. a. - CJ.. - ca 2 p 0.. w a- in ~' y vi c+'~ n, n o `o o I m o aNi ~ aNi o ,~ a ~ o ~ n m n '~ o m~ o o a o n ~ ,r» r~ Acs ~ 3n -- ~ a~ m ~ ~ ~ Cp ~ Q7 ~ Lt) O ~ I.f) ~ Dg ~ Lf3 Y IS) ` [U 3C i17 ~ 1!) ~ pn ~ ~ ~ lO ~ pp cU.. ~ ~ w ~- ~ ?- X ~ U X U U X E.A.. K I.A.. ~ li" X E~ K C~ ~ i~ X F--- X f- ~ h^ X ~ e~- `n ~ `o O s o O o ~ `o O `o O o ~ `o O o O `o ~ `o O o O `o ~ `o O `o c-- Iz a ~ z e- u. z Ed, a u, z u. z i~ o_ u. z u_ z u, r>7 u,. z u., z u, a. u., z LA. ~ cS7 h Cb U ~ ~ _ 7~ ~n) o 0 0 N Q Q O ' ~ ~ O O U d U ,~ ~ -- ~ ~ U O ~ N y ~ _ p Q p O US ~ ~ O O O y O ' O O U ~ ~ '6 m ~ c = w o m '~ ~ ~ v N o - o o: o a o. Q ~ p ~ ~ Q p ~p ~ SA W c ~ w m '~ Q ~O o C3 o O O n 7 ~ .n ro ° n ~ o ~ ~ ~ N ~ C ~ U W N N N ~ ~ _ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ N ~ { ~ N rv - ~ ~ •m ro ~ ~ ~ o ci r5 c c ~' ~' ° m a> ~ o v ~ a :a ~ _rn ~ ~ m °~' C`i c c c ~ o o -n ~ o Z Z ~,. c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ rn o w~- °o,~ c~~t Wit; Q - w ~ o Ci c~.. r~ '~ ni ~ ~ m ~ d ~ ~ N ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ T ° ~ ~ >, ~ m ~ ~ o ~ o m U ~ o o m~ iri ~ g ca x ~ ~ ~ C] O :N rn , ~ ti O E v Q ~ ~ r ~ u3 ~ ~t a of °u~i m o L ~ in' ~ ~ w ca ~ os o~ m '~ Q .Q ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ c rn ~- ' ~ o ° ~ i°r`pi ~ 9 '3 u`~i a m a ~ Q m ~ ~ ~ '° © ~ -a ~ -a ~ o ~ o ~ ra o ~ ~ ~ m ~ U ~ N CV ~ ~ o er o cn" Q m .c N ~ ~ Q [.S~ ty >C ~ ~ X ~ ~ C7 ~ C7 '~ ta.f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fL r ~ tQ nom. €i z~ tom-- ~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ ' ~ U 4 O: N) If3 CQ ~ - N F~ h - O cfl n C3 .' N :nl : ~ ni ~f- : C3 ~ ~ C~ -CA - L17 -in ~,. O O O N q q N Q 4 CJ N N a Q- O O 0- N N © © O _ ~ O (j d 2 7 EC C U Q O O '.0.. O ..O . (Q O O O CA cS 5,~ 61 f U O ~- N LV N ~ 3 CU ~ ~ Q7 ~ W _ m - _ ~ ~ '~t d Vim,' ~ _ U C p ~ -€1 O Q O '- ~ Z cO [O ~ ~ A n a ~ ~ a ~' ~ ~ N ~ c ~ ~ o m o ~ v; Q o ~ ~ r c ~ O O q 4 C7 ~' ~ ~I? [O OS N N C ~ a ~ a c ~'~ to -:~ ~ a+ y u.e ~ ~ .a o ~':. ~ ~ m ~ rSA N ~ ~ ~ p •LSS Lll ~ ~ Q C W CJ Q al O c7 Q C] -: ~ E Ld :'' ~'~ 'V N O ~ ~ N Vi rn W p o c w ~ E -a o m E ~ to .c ~ ~ ~ =o ~ ~ a m o.: o 0 0 [Sl Imo- cCf L€i ~ c6 ~ c s F-^ n ~ . A fil ~ ~ ~i]' . D O CL ~ ¢ ¢ z ~ ~ U ¢ ~ O O w ~ O ? n ~ v ~n ~i o 0 o a o 0 o c~ 0 0 - ~ C~ u1 C7 C5 N Sri D:'1 COS ~ ~ O O p H ~ l!) ~ r- x- ate- ~ ~ ~ Cfl M M O O p H-- (4 W W L?. CS C] [b V] O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ S. 1~- O CO GO to O [S O 4 Q N C? CJ ~ CO (fl ro Cri Ch CS) O ti ~ N N M ~ v ~ ar 'c ~ ~ v Uj O N R7 O C? O G3 O O O O N M O +-- O O O O O O Iti CS O m ti r- m ~ m T ~ ~ H ~ c o n c ~ Z ~ r X ~ ~ t31 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' a _ ° H v o rn ti cn cn cn c? rn ~ o ~ y°, ~ O N O r O .- O O O M 6 r 5 ~ ~ O V ~ ~ W `7 ~ U a o~ a m ~ ~ n cp o N G ? y O ~ ~ ~ ~ .a ~ M ~ Q _ O CS w N ~ p ~ O [~9 h 00 ~ O (DO Q ~ U ~ ~ O ~ O 'd' ~ ~ ~ O o ~ o © ~ © O] ~ ~ M ~ t(7 O ~ Y N C] ~ ~ O lS3 O CO U r, C a> U m ti in ~ ~ F C~ ~ ,C T rp N ~ ~i ~"" ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ U II3 ~ r O N ~ ~ ~ ` ~ N 2 ~ N N _T U ~ N U Q 4- N F- S 2 "~ a ~ f9 U O ~ ,~t_0 'L7 7 ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ N Ol ~ X03 N 3~1 ~ N N '_~ .a O U O b o r c ~ ~ ~ L ~ f Q U1 ."~ 0 0 o ~" y d; ~ M O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ N fJ A~7 ~ ti5 ~ ~ ~ ~ FJ ~ Q! O ~ ~ ~ ~ t+7 „- Q ~ G Rt G L C,3 .-- ua ~ CQ7 O C? N ~ r 5 td ~ ` F" 4~? O .L5 ~ t1= 6? ~ ~ W ~ N d~ m r r W C5 N N 'Cf C (tl T A {6 RS *~- ~ ~ et, ~ ~ r^- ~ ~ L ~ ~ Q d m rn ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~cs r~ a.. ~ ~' ~ ~ rs o o. iv C~ c°ot > c rn r- 0 °o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ,~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ -Q ~ ~ ~ a Q ~ U1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ -cs ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ m a~ m ~ ~ o (,U ~ ~ ~Vi ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cC J ~ ~ U C7 r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~s cs N ~&' C' pO p0 ' UJ a:7 [+1 U N N t`i1 t N N a1 w N' N ~ O ~ r N O 3fl c~] [f? O ~ ~ ~ ttJ d' N v n ~- ri ~ X Lll N n N ~ N N O LS] CD a ~ ~ fl ~ ~ ~ w o o U ~ ~ n U ~ U ~ ai r~ r~ ci ~r ~cr m o :n ui co tV ca u~ ua ra ~r1 ~n uz c~ !1 'ch M ~ O ~ O O Z O O C~ CS ~ N ~ N rn d' m .m- 7 V O ~^' ~ 4 ~ ~ Z G7 N C? N x m J~i ~ a a Z ~ o al o o I M N N N ~ (4 d O U Vm' M 4 4 p Q Q ~ ~ ~ p CA C? n Z V7 ca (i3 b R N O~ C~1_ M O ~I N ~I t 0 0 0 o I o 0 0 cn a o 0 0 ~ O~ rn m rn rn U r1 m ~ in x ~ o x ~ x ~ ~t d~ fl v <r ca O) d; U~ as 0 0 o z o z1l 0 0 rn v x o N rn ~ O of M f+'3 © N ~ C Z ~ ~ ~ .m- N N O ~ ~' ~ 1:7 EC ca 4 ca ~ w ""2 ~ tv coi ~-- ~I ~ lfJ N Z ~ ~ h ~ h .m- p o r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q 2 m ' ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ Z Q O ~ ~ o'. ~ Q ~ ~ ~ o v.. Z a' m a' m a~i Lt1 m Z ~ ~ m - U '~ cn '~ is Z ~ ~rs ~ ~ ~ m .'p v ~ - z ch ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a O a ~ a, r Z N m en +n 21..1 >, o ? a Y!1 °' : p o ~ .n .a .n .fl ~ ~ m - ~ ro m U c r ~ ~ c ~ ~ U v ~ v d v ~ a 'zs r. ~ U ~ ~ SJ ~ fY_ s s ~ Z .n 1>w .n m . ~ . , ~ o~ p a N o . ` ~ ham-- rte- ~ 1~- O ~ ~ ~ ~ rn u„ m w , ~, ~ ~ ' ~ O O O O _.r ,.a ~ ~ . i O ..a Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Z m o~ rn cn tQ Fes-- F¢-- ~ LLt FQ- ~ ~ ,~ ~ ciS ~ O n a a n t1G O O as G7- O ~ O o 0 E1. ~- V3 U N ~ N N ¢ 1-- h^ 4. U h-^ (/1 1°^~ !Y7 U p o o ca c~ oa w va ch n c? o cn U M m © rn r°N ~ o o ° ~ ° v (U [fl N N ~ ~ N eF V' V cf] cb co t[] N N a0 W V r ,~ n O ~ N N rn O O p C7 p N N n r b O N N O (+7 O O ~ r r M M O O] V O p p q O p n O n (n C3 O O p Q O O O N N O r O p M M p CS O O LLI W CO a0 n O O C7 O p ~ p p p o n o O CJ O O O O O> O} m O O O N a o rn rn w ua in N a7 w n m o N O C] 4.1 p p a6? a0 CO N O O C'~ M7 O N O O (fl CO M (~7 O O a ~r ~r ~r ca ua ua t~ r-. o co 0 N N O O O N N n N O p N N O N O O M c+') O [7 p p 0o co m o o w- n n n a? ~ O C7 Q U7 W ci) C? n C3 O ~ ~ ~ r {1 N O O O O p O O n n n C? O O n O O q p O O p O O O U3 p p O O Q p O O n n n c7 ('9 O ~ ~ ~ p p O ~ O V ~ U O O O t~ O N O q~ O N ~ N N r c'7 [+'7 N N X N N C~ Lry Ch sM-~ r O fD O ~ ~ p N N O O O [A 07 n to n ~ Z CO (fl O In r n GS o9 p m p O eF' d' d' C4 iI> [4 Q1 'O C q o- ~ rn rn o ~ ao ~ r <r n cu n w cv, ~r © © q a~ m p a> a O d ~ u7 p tf? p O h t~ ~ r O O C_ LL] h'^ Q .G N [U LLi N N n7 ~ o n ? O '~ Q V3 ~rpj ~ df US W ~ p ~ ~ Y o. G1 o N N ~ ~ <`p n ~ ~ G 77~ ~ p N N i~6 ~ cQ O d p p 7 r. CJ ~" q O N p N ~ m O R Q ~ ~ n ~ ~ !Y Q' ~ ~ O C C C C r- F ° ~ o a ~ c q ~ c*~i ~ ~ ~ ~ =o ~"7 © fL' v N N :r' q q q m j-. m O C7 p C'3 V` ~ ~ ~ v m N m w a7 m N UJ ~ ~ M li.. ~ ~ ~ C) '~ G C G C i1 z q 7 N ~p ~ 7 ~ ~ f.l_ LL. lL 31 co ~ p E ~ ?o E ~ 11-p V' [h O d' N f1 O V O h ~4 CO O N Ul O N q m Lf] © O In O1 ['7 O [") O W [O SO N W CL7 U7 il7 N m O i'7 N O N a] r 4 N q a0 ~n ui cfl N In to CO [V N h O cp q In V ~Y' 'cY N aCl M V Gr N a;S c7 N o0 N M N V: r N O O CO ~'J O O ~ M aq ~- r (O fO N N s-~ N N r^' M O r .- r r q q W (t5 r N r r .- N i0 I.n O d- ~- O r *~- O C~ c'7 N N N p p N N O p C? O O N O M O O O O O O e- N q O p p C"? C] ~ ~f) N N O O ~ N Ll7 O Vr' O O O O ~ ~ N N Cat G? ~ N N O q ~ r O r O O ch O t+1 O O r O O +~'^ r r O O O O O O r r O O p r O q r O q ~- Q O © O O r r O O O O O O O O O O O O O 01 p p p O O O~ ~ 4 q O O O O O O O O O O O et?~ W q V N N m O CO O N m W M M N N N m N C7 If] CO q tf7 r O 00 (fl N O O c+3 r7 c7 O O M M N O O ~m r O r O CJ ~ ~ c+7 q q r r r b CJ r r r C3 O N ~ O ~ r 1~ O O O r^ t0 f+7 N r r m N Of (O O ~f] r Q N O N q CJ C7 ~`7 ~T3 q C? m N O C7 s!' r O ~-^ O O M O M O CJ r r r p O r r r p p C"7 N O O q q C,7 N N O O N N N O O N ~0 0 0 0 0 o m m o o c7 o p p n p ca p p p p [°I O O 4 O 4 M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O c- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o n r5 c~s c~ cS c~ c~ ~ C] C7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O Q q 4 6 O O O p p O O O O O O O O O iE' d" O O M O O d] O M N N O M O O O O O Q Sit aD ~1' q ct' q LA O ~' 7.C1 Lf') N ? N 67 m I.() V O ri ni o of r ni r> cci ci ~i Eri iri c~ ~ <f r o r•i v ~ m N .- r r ,- r .- b O O G7 (.A ~C7 p CO q tf) ~ CO N f7 O M L'7 I.n O m M ~J O N m q O q f51 (ri N zC] N O O CS 1.13 Gf O O f+ N O W O ~D O O tL1 41 [p O O q} N O O m N r co cn .-- ~-- ~ ~ ~- N co N rn rn as ~ o co q ca m m ti ~ _ r ~ c~ ~ ~ in rn o rn o ao 0 o N N o O o o w o c~ O N q q i~ O N O O V V c£ O O V V C1 O O m [U N W 6r zP O N N 00 . p N ? ? A" p Cwi ~ N 67 N ~ [~j N VS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M N N N N [~3 N VS In N fU N Q ~ P q W c7 CO ? ?, r [i] © Q. Q ~ o O O ~ N 1Y [Y o N ~ v F- !L ~ ~ v F~- F '~,' ~ o ~ m m ~ ca ~ O O ~ ao o ct°i c`a a`o ~ ° a ~ m n n © N N R" ~ ~ Ol rn m Q7 N m N ~ c[7 O N n N Y= d O O CJ Q S`' m r~ m m rn rn ~ o ~r rn rn rn rn r.. ~ ~j~, a ~' ~' ~ ~' ~ ~ C7 {a C7 C7 ~ y~ o c c c ~ ~ o c c c ~ ° 'u~ ~ ~ ~ rn m c c c c w~ ~' v =o =a U~ c aj cV u1 ~ a a. a. a. a ~ c~ ii ii iL LL ~ m m m m ~ m m m m ~ 1 W 7 N C~ tU ~ '.~ g1 7 '~ CL r E- Q I--~ <C i » Q [~'] Lid N ~ 4p] 000 ~ 000 'VO' N m [~Y7 ~U" oOU o (0 N r N N C7 C] C? N N O p ~ O O r- r- O O O O O C7 C> ~ N O C'] C7 N N O O O O O O i7 d O d O O O O O © © 0 0 0 0 0 0 C] Q C7 Q q CJ C7 C3 ~ m N (7 O m ~ cv c~ o c? c? o 0 0 o ca o m ~ ~ cNi, a °o, coa, o 0 0 0 0 0 N~ N C? C~ N •- CJ Oo1t o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci o a ci c~ o c5 b C C7 a C1. l9 ~j 'O rn rn ° o c°a, °o, °o. a ~ ~ ~ n ~ ui r r-- c~ w ~ rs ~- ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ o -a m ~ ~ ~ r > Q o ~- ~ ~ cn u ~ q = ~ m - p _°c ~ O ~ rn M C7 Cq SL] O t(J ~ ~- D .C M A C ao ao ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o o ~«- m ~ ~ ° o `o ~ C7 C ~.". ~ U w p m ~ m ~ o m o ° ° ~ ~ ~ o m o ° m ~ o ~ © ° °' 'gyn. ~s a ti ~ ti ~ + ~ p ~ a1 C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ll rn 4n _ m (Op M ~ a3 O7 ~ Q. O p ctl °o c`na ~- ~ ~ a> Q. N ni N N N N O ~ ~ ~ ^C ,.~ 3 m q~ Q r+ 0 C1 d p p O ~ N ~ O d ~ W N a0 L p r ~ p N N 0 ~ '~~" N ~ C1 t N 0 ~ C1 O N (p U U .C ef' O Q ~ o ~ '~ '~ n ~ c°~v u ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~' m v ao ~ H 1- cn '10 F- ~ ~ ~, p `m ~ ~ =o m a a~ r a N [Y ~ Y ° U -'~ c ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o o i ~ ~ ci ~ b N w ° ~ ro o ~ p w w F"' ~ ~ 1- C.~ a ~ ~ Q ~ ~ F- e- rn rn ~ rn co ~ rn ,p a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' o ~ ~ m U © ~ 7' ~ ~ ~ ~ © ~ ~ v Q p I^^ LL3 W ~ F^ f^w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N Qj N (n y `'~ ¢3 CQ LO ~ d U N ~ c o O c = A „'~ U N ~ ~ uy O py ~ m > 3 0 ~ r5 cJ LL' [Y p ~ a ~ m N "' ,p [7' [" F- Q C1. CC3 [X] n ~ N r ~- N d I- ~ L.L N O c o ca ca o O. a ~ ~ (T6 l9 U 19 O O P •~- p LS ~' T7 v3 a QUy1 O O C,~ ~ ~ O- ~ O- 02 U Q U ~ 3 ~ m N ~ N p ` 'O O i a O N N N O ~ R. ~ _G ~ U N N w N Q C "O m U ~ U N ~ a ~ -O ~ N ~ U ~If O ~ p. W 0. N ~ .OC ~ O Ul ~ T O O b1 7. A O T r0-. W 4 ~p 7 Tf ~ ~ U fl_ N O m t 7+ U O ~ m ~ U m c0 cg O C) a O ..~- ;i N U ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U O N n N N O ~ O n ~ Ca ~ d 0 ~ N to O- ~~1., ., ~ F~0 O- Q Q ~~7 b M O ro ~ ~ ul ~ 0. O ~ U ~ to ~ O ~ a In ~ vN ~ in in O ~ p N N ~ ro '~ O O ~ ~ t0 ~ 'O 'C CJ ~ ~ -p p C? m © C C N N O ~ ~ ~ t6 ~O p a ~ O) ~ O ~ p mO lf] (O C9 CS n •a o o n o U © O p N p` ~ ~ p O Q m ~ O N N N (~i N m [3 ~ f6 O ~ W ~ U f,6 O vI6- ~ 'cl' ~ vim- l+7 ` ~ ~ ti p p= "O ~ ~ p ~'~'. N [gyp (0 -C7 p ~ m ~ O b m ~ C _C p ea. m a c o n ~ cis ~ n °' m m a~ ro m m ~ ns o n. cNn. 'ia o .c °a 'rr "' m .c ~ ~' n ~ ~ .Q ~ N « 7 f3. ~ ~ N g n 47 iSJ ~ N C> ~ ~ O O ~ N N N N O ~ O = O fi 0. ~ ~ m m ~ N T pl CJ1 O7 OI V ~ C C ~7 N ~ ~ 47 00 i CJI d m W ~ ~ d7 ~ C[N1 Cml] 0. O O a a ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ a ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ C U U U U '~ m '`?' a n °o ~ ~% o 'ny v 2 ~ m r c~`i `s o 0 0 `g o C p .a» ~ N ~ ~ I.K) N ~ ~ O C Q m ~ C O O ~ m ~ U p ~ X X ~'.- N C1 ~ O O .N.. ~ ~ '6 ~ 0.1 O N O N C?. N III C C ll1 UI o E '~ F- ~ Q -~ °O m ~ .c ~ a `m U E ~ .c ~ '~ r v m m is As p. N ci _ ~ ~ a = w a "~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ,.~.: p1 m '~ TS C] Q L m C "7 S31 ~ ~ ~2'J ~ C C C C ~ m u~ a a c a c o ~ in ° ~ cn a ~ u~ a~ as m h- ~ ~ rn N ~ ~ '~ m lE~€ m ~ °' rn -~ LLj c7 ~, p -~ ~ Za ;p z~ p ~ t m .o ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ N w m n ~ .p rn us d -cz c ~ m r`r u1 v cn ,~ io ~ m a~ m w N q ~ ~ m ~ ~ m ai o a ~ ~ c ~ ai o ~ ac m ~ -~ ~ [r CC fY ~ C2 ~ '~ RL3 m N N LY ~ ~ c6 N Q' ~ ~ m Q1 N ~3 _N ~ O ~ m ~ Q1 c6 tt1 p ~ O ~ ~ N ~U U7 N CC3 C... ~ ~ ~ (.~' (.~.' F- ~ ..C U ~ U ~., Q.. LL' F-» ~ ~ U LL U' ~"" ~ ~ 7 3 7 7 ~ ~r- Q N N .- .-- c- <- LL Q C3 q- ~ .- c^- r- Q O ~ N .-- .-- c7 f1 f.~ 4C (~' ' Via) r- s~ o ~r ~ u~ o v r~ ti O O O M a0 00 M m C? m O Q? m ca'i o rn ~ ~ o 0 0 ~ o ~ f0 ifl N N tl~ '~ N v v ~ w ua ~a ~C3 a(3 o(J ~ ~ [~- ti S7 N O r N C1 M O O ~ 07 [p N O Q O O O Q Q O C7 O C3 C7 CJ O o c5 0 ~ ~ o m m o N o ~ N N o o n N N n N r:~ b ~O O O O C] q O O O 4 O Q LLl c~i oG W O] O O O t' V m O O O ~ O C? q cSJ CO CQ O O O D 4 Q Ca O q O b o O O O O N LL O O] m O O t,} N O C7 V 7 O N r O O C17 O O m m O N O O r r O p O O m f+'1 c~ O O O N N Q ~ O O N N O N O O 0 0 o ri c~ c~ c~ ci o o ca ci w 0 oa ao co 0 o to ic; ~r o o ~-- ~ ~ m o0 0 0 0 o c~ o c? c~ a O o 4 Q O O I~? m [+7 G7 O O CJ 0. N O O O O O q O O O C3 O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O © O f~ 4 O O O O Q O O O O O O Ili ~ N N a ~ U O O J ~ _ ~ ~ ~ M M C7 O d' ~ O O O ~ O d: V} ~ ~ N ~ O C] O ~ O N r- c-- O 00 O N - r+- N N m m N 'U ~ ~ d N N N ~ O O :-_ O q N N T X ~ h D ~ O .m- h ~ O fD O r ~i3 a a fl Z ~ m O tN'J r O ~ ~ C~ ~ D 4 r ~ ~ ~ ~ "A ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~' O n p N C1.. O Q1 O V' tl0 h ~!' V O Sfl O W N a N N O C'1 C~ rn m C? cp O O ~ t!] Lf) CJ N O O t~ ~ d I~ O O _ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N fl W ~ ~ ~'. lfj 0 ~ ~ W f~/~ ~ U . LC.. ' L1J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U - Z o O ~ ~ -c -~ fli (0 Q X L7 '~ ~ (Y07 OQ N N N ~ p ~ ~ Y ~ ~ Lu is ~ cfl °o ~ ~ ~ op ~ ~ ~ c `a d. m m 'iu w °D N m c~'a ~ ~ o d O Q 'S ~ ~ -t~- Z p0 q in n n Y p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 97 ~ ~ N ~ ~ d` Q' ~ m c- aNi w c U 1 N c~ a> O O 'S ~ ~ m _m ~ ~ ~' . ~ ~ 7, .a a 7 n n o ~ ~ o U C~ C7 C7 ~ © Z Zn ~ ~ ca ~ o p ~ m obi a~i ~ C~1 U' ~ ~ c c c 4J ~ to ~ v E c, n ~ ~ G~ L~ ~ ~ es m ii ii ii ii ~ l~ N N ~ Z Ntp N ~ C~ L4 t- ~ ~ . O . - O ~ U ? O E U IL O v~ cri n d- N i+ o ~ct n n- co cq a N Gn r ca N c~ aq ~ C> O ~ P? [7 G* r7 G Cs7 Cp UJ N ~Ci U] tC] Ln N m ~!J C7 CV ° N ab © N ° 07 iC1 tf7 [O h i~ i.[) CD f~ N N h O '~ ° t[7 ~' e1' V N c0 [7 V d- N c0 c1 N m N [ 5 N ~ r N Q q cp q p (p [+'1 qp r r (t? cfj N N r N N 67 N O _ _ I+ P7 N O M C+J Q3 N r N N Cri N 4? N O G3 aD cq N G~ Q R C.? O O O ° C9 C1 C'S C} O C7 C? C7 C9 C} b b Ch d C7 O O O D ~7 Lf7 N O r O C7 O N O N N 6] N N N fA N ~t N C3 r r C] N C7 N C7 C~ r r b b 4 r r G,3 Q p Ci CJ O C.? C7 C7 C] Q C.? C] Q Q Q C7 Q Q O O O ° inl ~-- o n o o v r~ o o n o o n ea r ca ca o o c~ o co u> a a a n o n o ca o a n ° ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 M) Cp O N N N O 7 d- C7 N tt7 i.f9 CJ f+) N V' 'a' b N M ~ N (7 r r p M O N O O r r r O O r r»- x-- ° ° r= o 0 0 0 o ri r> o d 0 0 0 o a o ri ci ci o r~ (,~~ t'') CJ N ~ fit? ° d' R M CJ Q N M M O N V' N O ~ C3 fV O N O O r r .-- O O r r r C7 C7 © © © © © © © © O CJ 4 4 G7 Q p C? O Q CJ ° Q I+' N O ° <'^ SCE C O ° ~r N N O b N N N d C7 N 4m~' o o ° ° a o o a ° o c.> o o ° a c? n a n o n o ci o 0 07 nti b o c~ c5 c7 b o ci o © © 0 0 ° ° ca o ° c~ c7 ° o o a o o a a o 0 0 ° c> ca ca ca o ca ca c~ ca ca o c> ca ca a a 0 0 a 0 Q O Q O CJ Q ° O O O O O O O O O O O O d sF~ cY C~ C] m b c7 rB Ca m N N Ca M cn ccs [A o o cn o~JI o5 ° ~cs; c? v n co c? ~ct; =n ~n cv c.~ m rn in v, o M N O 61 ~- N O C6 O N in i.n O M cJ' d' Q t+j s( r ["S N r r r r r r N i~ b C] O 11~ In O O l!] C.'7 b h C7 O N N (`') O O] L7 l{] O W ~ h O C4 O ~ m i1} N N N If} Ifl tf) IS7 t~ N N C3 U] C7 C53 b © c7 c+7 ["S b Q c+7 N O C? (D r r d- ~ r r r r r r N ao N rn o 0o er o m o eo r> r~ h in .-- <-- n. v _o i~ ti u3 Cs~ c? O © [XS CJ G7 N N G~ C7 Q O a(7 ° c7 C] N L] q h C+ h f] C7 'd- V' ~ © © ~ d' c7 O O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ° ~ ~ ~ R7 O O p N ? C] fl' p N RU' N ~ ('7 N ~ OCI ~ N ~ N M fd Ul (Il N M d N N ~ ~ cxi z~ -es F N ~ ~ ~ n ~ cp ~ F- h~ ~ m FL F~ '~: a o m o ~ n ? O O ~ cp o a o m ~ o o `o w © N N U CL' a' s ~ CR C71 i77 C37 ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ vh- N ~ ~ Q r ~`- ~ O O O 'S c~ m m m m a O ~ S rv o O ~ aFJ Vl ~ OS 07 L7] 61 "O L? d uj O ~ i33 iSi N C7 ~ ~ O ~ v a. ° c c c c m o C7 C1 C7 C7 ~ a. ~ T ~ o ~ N -~ N m cv m v ctl ~ 'r7 `B "t7 ~ ~ ~ 'a `a -a ~ ~ ~ q= p- 0. A.. Gl. 0.. N CJ LL, LL I.L, li„ ~ ~ ~ CA 07 OJ ~ N a £fl ~ OES ~ z Q1 ~ N c~ N J ~7 N 7 ~ CL r F- ~ F- Q }- d raoi~ s.n N ~ ~ ~ 6 Lf3 in (O f+ m O O) Lf) ~ N W m O O O LO m N N v~ m N Cri N C7 C3 C7 O q O Q O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 { ~ rn N ca cs ca o p o 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o n a °n, a a o°, n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o, o c5 cs r~ cti c5 0 o u r ~ ° ~ c~ c°~ c°y °p O O O C3 Q O O O C C3 O O O O o O f7 O . O © O O iJ © © © p., U ~ T ~ a C A N O C _ Vi O 0 0 0 o a n o 'o n ~ 0 0 0 0 o a O o 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 ~ E ~ ~' ~ E as -ca 0 vs ~ T ~ O N ~ y 41 ~ N u _ai aEi c ~ p o E ..a m ~ ~ ~ ~ i N N N 71 V y ~ m a `" o ~ .E ~ rn rn ir°s, °v. o °o, °o, o ~ o E o c°1i 'cn ~ m w m lf) V' Q m w^- 4 ~"- .- P IU 3 f/1 W al O O CTI 4~..J E p U ~ 'E -O m U N ~ "tl c~.-~6 ~ W a y ~1 ~p7 C N_ ~ p0 O ~ ~ N .E O ~ r N US i.() ~ O C7 O ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ r rr CJ G3 Cs CJ C? '~ ~ ~ c p .E ~ c ~E d ~ m ~ .E ~ C] C7 Cri o ~ C~ N y """ LL. c~»w L.L N ~ T U u- ~ ~ E ~ N ~- w a~ 'u. m ~ 'n m m r ~ cr o ~ rn m C2 ~ U U tL m m © m o m o .- o ca ~' N 'd' C7 O O C6 CO O N ~ (0 p U~ LL N ~ U_ N N ~ ~ ~ o _C a L] m o ~ ~ O ~ ~ Q ~ U ,~ Q O N W (~q ~X y N ~ ~ b O Q N Q7 N N 0 o f~ N ~ a p ~ y N l7 N N ~ b N f~ rn n n ~ ~ in ~ ~ ~ °n ~ D v~ u~ vi 0 N O N © 9~1 ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N .G ~ o M m w w c~ri ~ ~, co ~ ~ m _ ~ _ _ ~ ~ -~ ~ c~7 0 © °- .Q- to c ~- E uS R (fJ U7 ~- ~ ~ ar R. m o ,d. O ~ a F^^ ~-' p in }- O Rf a (6 ~ W ~ ~ N ~fJ N ~ A ~ ~ ~ O O O y C~J O - ' O ~ CD `- O O O GO O ~ O N W N i[J N N i17 I.n ,~,,, ~ o ~ -cy x o U ~ N /~ C] L1 m IU O N ~ ~ O O N l4 O 'O n 73 N a TS b l7 N Z] ~ C? ro N ~- `- rn rn ~ pr ca o ~ rn a~ ~ ~ m I~ Q ~ d ~ iri o c c c p m c c ~- ~- ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ a a =a cn 3 cm`s ~ v ~ ~ ~ .ci ~ .a °ui s ~ ° ~ ° ~ O C '~ '~ ~ ~ 4. o c co c rp c ~ .U ~ .n m .n ~ U ~ U m aj Cam[ v7 m m o:] sn Q U o q r- p p q ~ a ~ ~ ~ m t3~ ~ v > '~ q ~ U j~ U GJ j~ [C jX tY ~ jX P- X h~ ~ ~ t~= 4 ~ O Fes-- O ii ~ i° ~ ~ z~ ti ~ i° Oz ~ a~ C 0 R U N N C CS A ICf S] ~ W C6 ~ A A VI ~ ~ N C N ~y C y N Ca 7+ N ~' ~ N y ~ N ~ 7 C ?, ~ .ST N Q y -~ 7. y, ~ N C N N » s ~ C G O ~ Q E N N ~ 11 ~SA .,~ ~ Q1 = C 'N i~^n ~ N a ~ Vl G7 O N ~ ~ C ~ .Q U .n ~ ~ m w _ o a O ~ N N W 'N ^p v ~ Q7 C '~ Q1 Vl ~ ~ C N ~ C ~ v N v uNi o ~ ~ ° m ~E ~ m '~' ~ c .~~, CO ~ '~ N Q1 N ~ T (CS N C ~ Q O ~ o ~ y i0 -S,3 ~ 6 CA `3 N ~ ~, ~ ~ W l6 'D U ~ a0 N C p ~ N _ U .p ~ O q 111 F- - ~ ~ F ~ 'O ~ LS QJ ~ ~ N ~ N N ~ o 'O (6 "O ~ OS ~ Vi N 7 "C7 7+ ~ '~"'" LL ° tp tV Z7 N =p > N v C17 ~ [i rte- QI O ~ ,Q. ~ ~ O C a '~ C..) p ~ N ~ p c3 ~ ~ ~ ~ N T C N ] l6 -p p 3 ~ ro IL W O ~ ~1 p td ~ F- °- Lt. ~ ~ m Li. m w ~ ~ ~ p ° ~ as -,ors ~ u- ca w m U N .a a -° m ~ ~ .X _N m CJ Ll m q .c ~ D 'n ~ Q r ti. ~ - vi o N O a m a ~ ~ is a- rn o. c ~ ~ ~ a N p '~ ~ j m x N p ~ ~ 3 N ~ ~ ~ Q, Q ~ ~ .A l6 ~ L1 ~ ~ IL ~ ~ R C3 Q a~ w a~i ~ a ~ ~ w ii Q o m as a aNi aNi N Q tY ~ to m m ~ o cu C~ N N ~ ° N ~ dJ p N ~ ~ d Q ~ N Vp] 1n N 41 lf) ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CZ N N V ~ N N ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ a ~ N IA o N N ~ a N ~ m a t5 f9 a (6 v p o W o C7' Ll a' ~ v v~ v m m m ~ as ~ m o in w rn~~~~ Q~ N ,s. ~ ~ ~ ° ~ o i° o m o '~ co a 'n c° m 'a' w sn ~ ~ m n !- ~ ari 1- J ~ ~ ~ rn ~ iii a~ ~ rn iri ~ :ii ~ ui ~ ui ~ d (',~ ,~y ~ C? T N '6 4 '6, N 'L3 C N G iC] C N C N p N p N N ~ N C7 ~ p e c_n ~ _rn o m e `m o `m o ~ m q ~ a o m o i s j o a~`~ a m c u~ n sa ~n a w v cn o N in m a~ ro ~r ~ ua o ~ ~ ~ ~ = co = ~ rs ~ rl w ~ ~ o ,... w ors ~ u; _ in n rr a irs ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- X ~ >f O ~' O jX tx X ~ ° ~ j~ ° r ~ ° to ° rn cn ~ ~ C7 j~ U ~ ~- `o ~ `o ~ o ~ `o O `a O `o ~ `o a ~ `o ~ o ~ `o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o C? F].. ~- u- Z Z u. n_ u_ Z u.. ~ u. a u. z ~--~ uw 0. u. a. u.. a u.. d ~ a ~ n. sa_ ~ ~ ~, C a ~ ~ ~ ~ .Ll y -Q p ~ O C ~ .N ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ O p .N E^V31 ~ p ~ p~j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O U ~ .c1 N tl? v1 ~ _ U Ul tll a W ~ N N (9 'CS ~ ~U C O ~ E D ~ O U O W U ~ G y G ~ ~ "O O C ~ E O V .y U ~ O C ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ O _ C N N l31 ~f N N N N ~ O ~ aN~ ~ ~ O V ~ '~ C ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ o ~ '~ ~ ~ Q Z3 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ? a ~ 00 O O O ~ ~ LL ° iL Q1 ~ ~ N 'ID ~U"7 e~ N aI ~ ~ 4n _ _ ;,a a cn ..-. o v - 1- 11 ~ N ~ U '~ ~ ~ ~ rn ~ m ~ Ct iv o ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ w W u ig 3 ~ a ~ u. v m o F- o ~ ~ ~ o ~ '~ m ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ X 7 ~, Q> v U z37 w ~ U '~ ~ ~ ni N ~ ~ ~ U N ? A7 N K N _v N (V f~ ~ O +- "O j ~ a- ? ? Ll ? ~ LO ~ 7 tt5 X lL ~ a to m ~ p ,~,,, .~-. 3 o U ~ Q o N N ~ v © N N O O .II O O ~ ~ ~ n y' to y" Vj ~ ~ ~i X ~ ~ W ff1 © LL7 CO N 9? In tf7 O O ~7 O O ~ l(3 ~ Q '~ ~ ? ? N 4n ~ X ~ N +~-' +~-' X N X y ¢ N N UNy N N ~ O O N U ' Q ~ ` a vi vi ° R U U u0i d O Q7 ~ 0„ w ~ ~ ~ ro N tli ~ ~i o N f~ o ~ a m ? c ? o ? ~ ~ ..1[ ° . G ~ ° ~ 'CJ' ~fi In N N U7 N if'1 US N i.() U <.'+ U IIJ U Q SU C} oo N 4 O O op O ~ O .N,,, c0 N ~ C] ~ W ~ 4 O = 47 ~ O rn Ifi Lf) i.() 3A N © N n7 ~ Q ~ N ~ ((S _O (if N tb Y O Y N Y 7. p A N ~, ? O ? _C 0. t C1- c- O to fJ o ~ o ~ taf7 ~ ° O ~ O ifj O o ~ R h ~ ~, o ~ a ~ ~ ~ o ~ o N . ~ N C7 ~ ~ a ~ ~ D ~ ~ F-- ~ ~ O ~, r ~ .-» y Gj ? ~ O ~ ~O © d ~ ~'O r 20` ~ ti X X X ?C X ?C 7 )C w~- )C X fl ~ a ii O u°_ ~ u° ~ u°.. ~ i° O a O Uz 'p ~ is O Q L° ~ 4o O O in a~ `w z C ~ P N - ~ O. p .N ~ N .a A N ~ ~ ~ N C N T b ~ ~ 1- N ~ N N Q p N ~ ~ E E d. -N ~ Q7 ~, N T N 7~ .N N ~ ~ O 1} N F G lU y ~ N N E ~ C7 U ~ N ~ N C Q7 Q} ~ p C O W S] Q C) ~ ~ N ~ tl} ~ N N_ ~ U us sw ~ -E o E N N ~ ~ E m ZJ T ~ p ~ @ N Ul i9 ~ i p ~" ~ N U N fU Cfl ~ N tNJ N O E m ~ ~ E o ~ E 3 "" ~ o -~ E m m o ~ 'w m m a E p 'rq ~ ~ rn QJ ~ .w. ~ a N N d _ N .M.. V 4h 'E ~- e~» O U C ~ f6 C y ~ ~ G31 ~ O U 7 ? 3 R _ ~ ~ ~ tL N T U ZT ~ ~ c- rE U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ,.. _ ~ 0 ~ > Ian LL ~ ~ ~ O -E ~ ~ U -~ O N tCf Q1 Q7 ~ ~ ~ N rn ~" ~ ~ R ~ F- c57 ~ ~ a c F-- m ~ ~ m E m ~ E ~ Q N 0} ~ ~ Q ~ N Q N N W i3 ~ O U .a ~ A N _ 'C iL w5 Z6 ~ ~ N ~ o O Q N o ~ U a ~ ~ o ALA, o ~ ~ Q7 p 0.1 ~ ° ~ ~ N O _ ~ Q O lU N Q v _ Ca O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L7 N ~ U1 tlJ 1[) l0 ~ V3 ~ ','t~'3 N X ~ X X 7 N U ,~ 7 ~ ~ ? 3 N U ~ ~ ~ ~ O E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ p x ~ ~ t ~ m x ~ ~ m N o ~ Q ~ m ~ ¢ o ~ ~ a~ c ~ c u\i c Q ~ ~ °ui as o v in a ~ o o v ~ ~ ~' ~ a> ~ a> ~ ~ v ~ a co N N o t^^ iri ~ ~ ~ ui ~ N ~ E E ~ E w ~ ~ m m in a ~ ~ m ~ ~ nom. m w ~ w d y °" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r a ~ --oi ~ ~ 0. fL W d- Lit #1] ~ _ i p , N o °u\i ~ 4 -~ m a a~i a~i ~ `+n A `*h o ~ o rn n ~ o cn o o w a E~ o p a w ~' cn p E ~ E ~ E rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ in o"za -~ an ~ ~ ~ ~ u~ ~ F.n aj N o o '~'- q m """ eS w m ~ ~ ~ `- N `- cts :B ~ o `"" a o `"' ~ r Q- ~~-- d ii ~ ~ ~ to a ii z~ ii z~ i° per. i° ~ ~ u°- a i° O d i° a Lp O t° Q -~ N N C n U C O L7i C .n ~ T N m A C ~ p ~ c N y~ N N .L1 ~ p .LTS -~ f!] ? ~ N N C a p G N O W ~ Q N p U N p C ~ U N ~ ~ N o ~ E N C ~ ~ N N E N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ` C ~ ~ N C y p U a0 O O_ p ~ 07 ~ ~ VI N ~, ~ N U1 ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ N ~ N O ~ ~ C N OJ a ~ O Q N ~ y ~ 4J ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ V t~N/1 C ~ N ~ O U O ~ ~ C o ` .N N ~ ~ ~ Qi Os N p ~ ~ '~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E ~ u ~ n v ~ o a ~ w p m - a m ~ - t~ ~ 7+ O3 ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ O ~ it N a ~ _ _ m ~ m ~ ~ ~ as ~ o p rs ~ -X m to ~ o u'. m ~ - ~ O ~ ~E a ~ 'E a ~ v ~ ~ ~ a o a~ v o L1 m ~ N m m CJ Q v sv ~ a~'i aNi ?, ~ a ~ ~ p ~ o ~ m m ~ n. 3t ~ ~ C3 ~ C] C] _ m m ~ m ~ v m m ~ _v ~ ~ U w o m U ~ ~ ~ x ~ a ~ ~ aNi ayi aNa ~ ~ ~' ~ p ~ ~ o ~ ,°ri 4. O ~ ~ vi N Gt a o ~ ~ ~ a is ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ vii m o Gn o cui ~ .C O p (V ~ 'ty O N ~ ;T3 G1 N ~ ~ L N ~ ,~ p Q U U ~ ~ Ll., ~ x ~ f1 I.1._ O ~ ~ Q U d U U ~ ~ ~ x°n ~ O Q c N 3C) m Q a D3 ~ W y o .C i j ~ LS] o m ~ Q N ~ ~ ~ W Lf] _N ~ _N N 4p7 N CO ~ ~ a1 ~ © N [10 ~ N t5] ~ 4 ~ CL O d ~ d p ~ O o ,~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ u ~ ° ~ ~ "~~" c (6 ° (6 o ttl o D ° D ° P o N ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' X D U L.1 ~ C.) x 1!_. LL LL ~ C7 X C:1 ~ U ~ f- X ~- ~ f-'- ~ ~- o~ `o O 0 0 a `p O `a Q `o ~ 0 0 0 0 `o ~ `0 0 p 0 ~ o CJ o ~ ~-- u~, n. u. ~ E- u. ~ ~ a it ~ u. z tr_ ci. u. z u„ z ~ cf.. u z ~ z ci cL. t€_ z u, N r O U r o rn -rn N ~ p. ~ 0 0 0 o ~ ~ b c _o ,o t]. ~ ~ .U O C V] O ~ ~ ~ ~1 y q~j b) O O O ~ ~ Q O p '~ U C] ~ A C3 ~ ~ v U W ~ ~ ~ U O O w~i '~ '. C71 ~ N U) Q CJ '0.. 7 ~ ~ tti C ~ N l6 ~ ~ O U 0 0 Q 0 3 ~ p £v o M. .o ~ ~ n U o o o a m ~ c N o o a~ ,~ T ~ ~ ~ .cz ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ a~ _rn cn O ~ ~ IO W _ ~ b C7 . .O d C C W O U ~ 'Z7 "O l4 C37 N ~ ~ N U ~ C N '~ O O ~ ~ p ~ Z Z y f-' ~ O ~ b O O~ O D ~ o N O 7 _ (~., yam-- L lII fi ~ o °- ~ m ; ~ a ° ~ ~ a`s a rn cn ~ ~ n c c ~ ~ t- o a~ U m o o ~ ~ c ~ m o ~ U U ~ ~,, o ~ ~ ~ O E ro ~ ~ d ui ~ 0 0 ~ ~ c © O O N Q3 _ ~ L.7 ~ ~ ?, d. d o ~ o ~ A c 'vi o ~ o u ~ ro c 4 m .ts ~ r O o p O .c c`a Q `o Cl ~ . [Y m v~ ~ o " . p , N O N C3 LO h".' Lf~E C7 EJ O ~fJ M M N p O O N ~ O O q N N '. 0. 4- o °o, °n ° c~,i ~ c c~ c~ ca _ ~ o 0 a a~ c U N O C3 d ~ ~ N ~ ~'l[J ~'~.~ O O O': '- 0. ~ O .0..'.. N O O O ' n ~' 7 ~ q~j 'O C ~ N ~ O7 X O ~ U _'"" X .a. 'cr ~ . (~I 'ct C9 S ~ ~ Q ~ V ~- ".~' Z Q O O' _ V~ Z O O. ~ d O N ~ ~ ~ ~ a _ u~ ~ u~ [35 C ~ q C N ~ : ~ r-+ ~ ~ ~ Sl 'CS w .N 'm. w ~, o c ~ w O a3 a p rn a a ~ ~ ~a ~ c ,E rn. g ~ a ~, o` o w o o u w ~ o w c~ ~ © - w ~ Z ~ o ru E ~ o ro - ~ m ~:' U o U ~ c Q ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ° o ~ E ~ ~ °- ¢ c cA o 0 0 fi ~ . Q Q z ~ ~ C7 ¢ ~ Q O w O. Oi']o O ' Q~ V l!! Id1 C7 C1 d C7 O O 47 O O O ~ C? ~ O O ~1J G] O O O O O O O _ N Efl a0 O O O Q 1- u~ C] ~- ~ r ~- ~ O ~ M M R} p) ~ ~ o in ua F- ~ rn rn n. © o co m m rn o 0 O o O o w a r~ v ~r ,'N, i+ o 00 0o ui o c~ r~ r~ c~ c~i o c~ ~ CO ii) ~ R~ 4~ O~ C7~ I~ ~ N N W O ~ t- U ~ ~ -~ M ~ ~ 0 z N a ~ m o o O o 0 n r~ o (ii h ~- 0.1 ~p ~ ~ F- ~ C ~ O 'c ~ Z ~ ~ N X w ~ ~ R [t ~ r ~ ~ d m ti [tJ f0 [O O O ILf) O ~ O] O O r-- b +c- O O O M O r ~ ~ ~ N ~ N N ~ [p U ~ ~ ~ ~ U Q w. N C C A ~ O N O V3 U N U O ~ N O ~ ~ W N ~ ~ ~ C9 ~ N ~ p ~ p N ~ ~ ~ O ~ o o ~ m ~ o U ~ ~ O ~ `- O rn E '-° ~ ~ ~ or Y Y ~ O ~ p ~ ~ ~' O U a~._ ~, N C ~ v M h ~ ~ ~ 7 F- `"' ~ ~ ~ in ~ v M to ~- ~- ~ 5' W ~ d 4A 7 flY ~ ~ ` ~ y lf7 LTi a1 = ~ U m O ~ sue- Q u~.€ ...t W ~ ~ _1 ~ _l _1 ~ 7C Q ~ tii S_ © ~ ~, `s? a "' '~ cry 0 N O d C7 ~" 1 ~' 6~ ~ O ~ fi yy O t? O C~J C? ~ ~ M r~ T Gr G 0 tJ o r u, `r' a ~ L ~ ~ M W ~ O ~ ~ ~ N o N ~ G ~ F- .r^ ~ 7 (CS '~ C ~ U! N ac ~ ~ M Cy ~ c~`+ N d a~ 7 C ~c} T 63 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ c --- \.- c ATTACHMENT C DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 300 North "0" Street- San Bernardino - CA 92418-0001 909.384.5857 - Fax: 909.384.5080 Public Works Fax: 909.384.5155 - www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us -;,1.1 February 14. :1008 Jorge Mendez. Project Manager San Bemardino City Unified School District 777 North 'oF" Street San Bemardino. CA 92410 RE: Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the proposed Wilson II Elementary School Dear Mr. Mendez: The Development Services Department of the City of San Bemardino has reviewed the above referenced DIER, and hereby submits comments to be addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) pursuant to the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Please respond with revisions and additional analysis as requested before presenting the Wilson II Elementary School projeci to the Board of Education for a final decision. 1. Traffic Impact Mitigation: The DEIR identifies a significant adverse impact of the proposed project at the intersection of 28111 Street and E Street. The addition of project- related traffic to this intersection is predicted to degrade the projected 2010 operation of the intersection to Level of Service F. A traffic signal is identified as being required to mitigate this impact. The mitigation measure proposed in the DEIR is a 5.45% contribution to the cost of a tramc signal. Since the traffic signal is needed to mitigate "opening day" impacts, it must be installed prior to occupancy of the school site. The fair share approach identified in the DEIR does not identify how the other 94.55% will be funded. The fair share approach used assumes that all other "new" traffic (growth) added to this location by other new development in the area will participate in the cost of the tramc signal. Unfortunately, the area is essentially built out. the District will be removing houses for the school, and there is scant opportunity for other new development in the vicinity to contribute toward the cost of the traffic signal. Other than the project traftic, all other future new traftic (growth) identified at this location is attributable to future developmelllthat will mostly occur outside of the area. This makes it impossible for the City to collect a fair share from all other future new development that contributes tramc to the subject intersection. It is not practical to expect that the City will actually install the traftic signal atier collecting small fair share amounts ti'om hundreds of projects that are outside of the project vicinity. The proposed mitigation tails to adequately mitigate the identified impacts. Mitigation Measure 4.15-1 should be revised to require installation of a traftic signal at the intersection of 28th Street and E Street. prior to occupancy. instead of the proposed fair share contribution. 't":;;'. 1 ~ , ,-. '- Wilson II Elementary School DEIR C011ll11CJ1l Ldh:r February 15. ~t)OX Page.1 of3 ~ Land Use and Cultural Resources: The DEIR correctly concludes that the project would have significant impacts on the existing neighborhood where construction of Wilson II Elementary School is currently proposed. No feasible measures were identified that could effectively mitigate inconsistency with the City General Plan or destruction of 29 potentially historic homes. However. these significant impacts could be avoided altogether by selection of an alternate site. The DEIR analysis of alternatives to the proposed project is inadequate and should be revised and expanded to identify a suitable alternative project site to avoid significant impacts to cultural resources and land use. 3. Alternatives: Please provide the following revisions and additional information: A. Revise Exhibit 6.3-1: Alternative Sites. This exhibit incorrectly indicates the location of the existing Wilson Elementary School approximately ,/, mile north of the actual school site. The locations indicated for Alternative Sites I and 2 do not match the locations described in the text of the analysis. Either the text or the exhibit should be revised to correct this. c B. Add an exhibit to define the Wilson Elementary School Attendance Area. There are numerous references in the DEIR to the attendance area of the school. For instance, the proposed site is apparently preferred by the District because it is in the western portion of the attendance area. The DEIR also notes that alternative sites I and 2 are located at the southern edge of the attendance area. However, the attendance area is not defined. C. Quantify the impacts of the alternatives in comparison to the significant impacts of the proposed project. The alternative project analysis is too general, and the conclusions are not supported by empirical data. Instead of making vague statements about alternatives having impacts "similar" to the proposed project. the analysis of each alternative should include a tally of the number and type of structures that would have to be demolished and an assessment of their potential historic value. This description should be compared to the 40 homes (29 potentially historic) that would have to be demolished for the proposed project. c D. Analyze potential development of an elementary school campus adjacent to the existing Wilson Elementary School. The alternatives analysis rejects the concept of expanding the existing Wilson Elementary School due to maximulll attendance limits (or guidelines?) set by the State. It may be feasible to develop a separate campus adjacent to the existing school, similar to the plan for construction of Roosevelt II. If there is any potential for sharing of facilities or amenities like a multi-purpose room, auditorium or ball fields, the acreage required to build the new school could be substantially less than the area required for construction on the proposed project site. c c c Wilson II EI~I11~ntary School DEIR COml11~nl L~th:r F~brllary 15. ~()()X Pagf.-' J of J E. Analyze another alternative site that conforms to the District's basic location criteria. In Section 1.3: Objectives. the DEIR states that the new school site should be located in the western portion of the attendance area. and it should not be located on a major roadway. Assuming that the existing Wilson Elementary School is in the eastern portion of the attendance area, the two alternative sites analyzed in the DEIR are in the southeast comer of the attendance area, and both sites are located on Highland A venue. a major arterial roadway. Neither alternative site meets the basic location criteria established by the District, so at least one other site should be considered and analyzed in the FElR. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Rep0l1. When the Final EIR is completed, please submit it to the City with proper notice of the public hearing scheduled to consider certitication of the EIR and action on the proposed Wilson II Elementary School project. Sincerely, r~9 ~ ~TF- Deputy Director/City Planner Cc: Valerie C. Ross, Development Services Director Robert Eisenbeisz, City Engineer - ATTACHMENT D , C CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 300 N. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Website: www.sbcity.org MtlYor JudiIIt Vol/" Coun.U M.-.., Esther EslrodD Sluan Long.;11e Gordon McGillJlis Ntil Derry CIuu Ktlley Rikkt Van Johnson Wtndy McCanrmack - MINUTES MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND THE SAN BERNARDINO CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO JOINT REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 1. 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS ~ The joint regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council, Community Development Commission, and San Bernardino City Housing Authority of the City of San Bernardino was called to order by Mayor/Chairman Valles at 1:37 p.m., Monday, . August 1; 2005, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. Roll Call Roll call was taken by City Clerk Clark with the following being present: Mayor/ Chairman Valles; Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longvijle, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson, McCammack; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Clark, Assistant to the City Administrator Sassoon. Absent: None. I. Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Section(s): A. Conference with legal counsel - eXlstmg litigation - pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a): Mohammed Fawzi Hassan, et at v. City of San Bernardino, et aI. - United States District Court Case No. EDCV 05-328 V AP (SGLx); 08/0112005 " - 35. Resolution of the Mayor and Conunon Bernardino adopting the 2005/2006 Improvement Program, Council of the City of San through 2009/2010 Capital Staff requested a two-week continuance. Council Member/Commissioner McCammack made a motion, seconded by Council Member/Commissioner Johnson, that the matter be continued to the Council/Commission meeting of August 15, 2005. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/ Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None. 36. Resolution of the City of San Bernardino adopting the Five-year Capital Improvement Program (2005-2010) for Measure "I" local expenditures, Staff requested a two-week continuance. , , i , ~ "-' Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council Member/Commissioner Estrada, that the matter be continued to the Council/ Commission meeting of August IS, 2005. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/ Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None. 37. Request for Findings of Consistency with City's General Plan - four proposed elementary school sites - Monterey II, Alessandro II, Burbank II, & Wilson II - San Bernardino City Unified School District . Valerie Ross, City PlannerlDeputy Director of Development Services, stated that the staff report provides background information on this matter and explains the City's responsibility to make findings of consistency or conformity with the City's General Plan based on provisions that are in the Government Code. She advised that staff had recommended that findings of consistency be made on Alessandro II, Burbank II, and Monterey II-but not on Wilson II. She stated that staff believes that the proposed site for Wilson II is especially problematic in that it would disrupt a stable neighborhood between "F" and "G" Streets around 24'" Street, located just north of Arrowview Middle School. It would also require the vacation of some streets and, as noted in a memo from the Police Chief, there are concerns relative to locating a new elementary school adjacent to a middle school. She stated that the preferred site in staffs opinion c 20 08/011200S is south of Highland Avenue, east of Sierra Way. However, the District does' not agree with the City on this. A memorandum dated August I, 2005, from the San Bernardino City Unified School District to the City Council regarding General Plan Consistency of Proposed Wilson II Elementary School was distributed to the Mayor and Council. City Attorney Penman stated that the school district would like the Mayor and Council to read and consider the memorandum before making their decision today. Ms. Ross pointed out that the information cited in the memo from the District is correct; however, it is the Mayor and Council's responsibility to interpret the General Plan, and staff does not feel that all of the references cited apply to Wilson Elementary School. Ms. Ross concluded by stating that staff recommends that the Mayor and Council find that the development of Monterey n, Alessandro II, and Burbank II elementary schools is consistent with the City's General Plan, and that development of Wilson II elementary school is not consistent with the City's General Plan. Council Member/Commissioner McCammack stated that she wanted the viewing public to know that the Wilson U Elementary School that is slated to be built behind Arrowview Middle School is not consistent with the City's General Plan, and this is simply the flfst step in the City's position of opposition to that school. She indicated there would be a lot more to come, and she didn't want anyone to get nervous thinking that they need to be moving tomorrow. Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council Member/Commissioner Estrada, that the Mayor and Common Council make the flDdings that Monterey U Elementary School, Alessandro II Elementary School, and Burbank II Elementary School are consistent with the General Plan; and that Wilson II Elementary School Is not consistent with the General Plan. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/ Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson, McCammack. Nays: None. Absent: None. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Staff Present: Mayor/Cbairman Valles; Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, McCammack; City Attorney Penman, Economic Development Agency Executive Director Van Osdel, City Clerk Clark. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner Johnson. c 21 08101/2005 0_ _ e c Page 1 of4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO-REQUEST FOR COt.:NCIL ACTION From: Dept: James G. Funk, Director Development Services Subject: Requests from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for determinations of consistency with the City General Plan for development of four proposed elementary school sites. Date: July 27, 2005 MCC Date: August 1,2005 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None Recommended Motion: That the Mayor and Common Council make the following findings: . That Monterey II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan . That Alessandro II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan . That Burbank II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan . That Wilson 11 Elementary School is nol consistent with the General Plan ~ W:ameSG.Funk Contact person: Terri Rahha1. PrinciDaI Planner Phone: 384-5057 Supporting data attached: SlaffReoort Ward(s): 7 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. DescriDtion) Finance: Council Notes: Agenda Item No. 31 I . ()e ._e I.- e - L Page 2 of4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDI~O - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Requests from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for detenninations of consistency with the City General Plan for development of four proposed elementary school sites. Applieant: San Bernardino City t:nified School District 777 N. "F" Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 909-381-1100 Repres(!Dtatives: URS Group, Inc. 10723 Bell Coun Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-980-4000 LSA Associates 20 Executive Park Ste. 200 Irvine, CA 92614-4731 949-553-0666 BACKGROUND: Section 21151.2 of the Public Resources Code requires the governing board oCa scbool district to provide written notice to the Planning Commission with jurisdiction prior to acquiring propeny for expansion or development of a school. Section 65402 or the Government Code requires the Planning Agency to respond within 40 days to the school district with a repon on consistency of the proposed school facility with its General Plan. Failure to respond within 40 days is deemed a finding of consistency. If the Planning Agency finds that the proposed facility is not consistent with the General Plan, the governing body of the school district may overrule the finding and carry out its program. In late June (June 20 and June 24), the San Bernardino City Unified School District (District) submitted requests for findings of consistency with the City General Plan for four proposed elementary school sites: . Monterey II Elementary School, proposed on the nonh side of Ninth Street, approximately 500 ft. east of Tippecanoe Avenue; . Alessandro II Elementary School, proposed at the southwest comer of Baseline Street and Herrington Avenue; . Burbank II Elementary School, proposed at the southeast comer of Rialto Avenue and Allen Street; . Wilson II Elementary School, bounded by 26th Street on the nonh, Arrowview Middle School on the south. "F" Street on the east and "0" Street on the west. Staff prepared repons and recommended findings to present to the Planning Commission on July 19. 2005. The staff repons to the Planning Commission (Exhibits 1-4) contain full analyses of applicable General Plan policies and objectives. Three of the school sites are recommended for findings of consistency with the General Plan, as substantiated in the Planning CommissiQn staff reports. Development of Wilson II Elementary School at the site proposed by the District would conflict with General Plan Objectives ) .37 and ) .6, which cite the importance of compatibility I ce I ,L-e '- e c Page3 of 4 with surrounding residential areas, maintaining the character of the community and not adversely impacting the qllality of life of City residents. StafT recommends a finding that development of Wilson II Elementary School would not be consistent with the General Plan, based on the following concerns about the proposed site: . The proposal would break up a stahle neighborhood with 80% owner occupancy, a model the City is striving to replicate in other areas. . The proposal would require vacation of a segment of 25m Street, making 26th Street the firsi available cast-west street north of Highland A venue, in a neighborhood where local circulation is already impeded by Arrowview Middle School. . The subject neighborhood is already impacted by traffic related to dropping ofT and picking up students at Arrowview Middle School. Addition of another school site at the proposed location would worsen these impacts. . The location of Arrowview Middle School on a major thoroughfare (Highland Avenue) increases the potential for outside influences on the middle school students, including exposure to gangs. The Police Department recommends against introducing elementary school students adjacent to this particular middle school (Exhibit 5). As lead agency for school site development under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the District is responsible for environmental analysis of the proposed actions of site acquisition and development. CEQA requires the lead agency to provide notice and an opportunity to review and comment on the draft analysis to all responsible agencies which will have permitting authority in the future. Responsible agencies typically rely on the CEQA analysis of the lead agency for their permitting actions. The City will have permitting authority for right-of-way improvements and extension and connection to City water and sewer services for all of the proposed school sites in question. Therefore the City is a responsible agency with a substantial interest in the CEQA analysis for the school sites. City stafT became aware that the District had circulated Initial Studies and proposed Mitigated Negative Declarations for three of the school sites for which consistency findings had been requested from the City. These CEQA documents were circulated to the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento, but they were not provided to the City, a responsible agency, for review and comment. The City Attorney obtained copies of the documents with a Public Records Act request, just as the formal30-day comment period was due to expire. In a letter dated July 15,2005 (Exhibit 6), stafTrequested that the comment period on the subject CEQA documents be extended, and that the District send notices and copies of proposed environmental determinations for all current and future projects to the City for review as a responsible agency. The District responded in a letter dated July 18, 2005 (Exhibit 7) that the CEQA comment period would be extended to August 18,2005. On July 19,2005, on recommendations from Development Services stafT and the City Attorney's office, the Planning Commission tabled all four consistency finding requests with an indefinite continuance, pending further review of the District's development plans and environmental analysis. In order to meet the 40-day time frame as specified in the Government Code, stafT has scheduled the requested findings of General Plan consistency for action by the Mayor and oe te e c Page 4 of 4 Common Council. After completing a review of the environmental documents, staff will respond separately to the District within thc extended review period agreed to by the District. FINANCIAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDA TIO~ That the Mayor and Common Council make the following findings: . That Monterey II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan . That Alessandro II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan . That Burbank II Elementary School is consistent with the General Plan . That Wilson II Elementary School is not consistent with the General Plan EXHIBITS: I 2 3 4 5 July 19, 2005 Planning Commission Staff Report for Monterey II Elementary July 19, 2005 Planning Commission Staff Report for Alessandro II Elementary July 19, 2005 Planning Commission Staff Report for Burbank II Elementary July 19,2005 Planning Commission Staff Report for Wilson II Elementary July 14,2005 Memo from Police ChiefGarretl Zimmon regarding the proposed site for Wilson II Elementary School Letter dated July 15, 2005 from Valerie Ross, Deputy Director/City Planner to Wel Elaw, Facilities Administrator Letter dated July 18,2005 from Wael ElaW, Facilities Administrator to Valerie Ross, Deputy Director/City Planner 6 7 ce e e EXHIBIT 4 SUMMARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION CASE: General Plan Consistency Determination for the Proposed Wilson II Elementary School 9 July 19, 2005 7 AGENDA ITEM: HEARI;\lG DATE: WARD: OWNER: Various APPLICANT: San Bernardino City Unified School District 777 N. "F' Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 909-381-1100 REPRESENTATIVE: URS Group, Inc. 10723 Bell Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 921730 909-980-4000 REQUESTILOCATION: A request from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for a determination that land acquisition and development of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School would be consistent with the City General Plan. The site is approximately 8.5 acres, bounded by "F' Street on the east, "G" Street on the west, 26th Street on the north and Arrowview Middle School on the south, located in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district. CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS: None ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: li1I Not Applie.ble C Exempt, Previously approved Negative Declaration C No Significant Effects C Potential Effects, Mitigation Measures and Mitigation MonitorinlVRcporting Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: o Approval o Conditions li1I Deni.1 o Continuance to: ce e e c I General Plan Consistency Detennination Wilson II Elementary School Suo Planning Conunission Hearing Date: 7: 19/05 Page 2 REQl'EST AND LOCATION The San Bernardino City Unified School District (District) has requested a determination from the Planning Commission that land acquisition and development of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School would be consistent with the City General Plan (Attachment A). The subject 8.5-acre site is located at the southeast comer of 26'" Street and "G" Slreet, adjacent to the northern boundary of Arrowview Middle School (Attachment B) in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district (Attachment C). The site is proposed for development of Wilson II Elementary School, a 32-classroom facility that would accommodate 900 students (Attachment D). SETTING AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site proposed for development of Wilson II Elementary School is approximately 8.5 acres in area, located in an existing single-family residential neighliorhood. There are 40 single family residences on the proposed site, built primarily in the late 1920's and the 1930's. The properties are well maintained and some of the homes have undergone major improvements recently. 80% of the homes in this area are owner-occupied, and the only vacant lot in the area is owned by the adjacent homeowner. Land uses surrounding the site include: North: Residential uses in the RS district. South: Arrowview Middle School East: Residential uses in the RS district. West: Residential uses in the RS district. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) The determination of consistency with the City General Plan is not a project subject to CEQA. The San Bernardino City Unified School District would be the lead agency for the project of acquisition and development of a school site. BACKGROUND Section 21151.2 of the Public Resources Code requires the governing board ofa school district to provide written notice to the Planning Commission with jurisdiction prior to . acquiring property for expansion or development of a schooL Section 65402 of the Government Code requires the Planning Agency to respond within 40 days to the School District with a report on consistency of the proposed school facility with its General Plan. Failure to respond within 40 days is deemed a finding of consistency. If the Planning Agency finds that the proposed facility is not consistent with the General Plan, the governing body of the school district may overrule the linding and carry out its program. 0_ _ _ c General Plan COll5istency D<lemunation Wilson II Elementary School Sile PlaMing Commission He.nng Date: 7/19.'05 Page 3 Wilson II is one of several sites under consideration by the District for land acquisition and development of new schools to meet the growing demand for classroom space in the City of San Bernardino. Notification to the Planning Commission for a determination of General Plan consistency will be required for each proposed school site. The District has informed the City of its facility needs assessment and has met with City, representatives to discuss site selection alternatives on various occasions. Despite serious concerns and opposition expressed by the City, the District's planning process for the Wilson II facility has advanced to the final steps required prior to site acquisition. The District has commenced envirorunental review pursuant to CEQA, and is now seeking a determination of General Plan Consistency. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS When the General Plan was adopted in 1989, existing public schools were designated PF, Public Facilities. Potential school sites were not specifically identified, but addressed through the goals, objectives, and policies in the General Plan. General Plan Objective 1.37 states: ..It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to provide for the continuation of existing and development of new parks, schools, goverrunent administrative, police, fire, social service, and other public facilities and open spaces in proximity to and compatible with residential uses." In accordance with this objective, the San Bernardino City Unified School District proposes to develop a new school site to serve the needs of elementary school children residing in the area currently served by Wilson Elementary School. Unfortunately, the specific site proposed by the Di$ct for development of Wilson II is located in a very stable, well-maintained and cohesive neighborhood. Demolition of 40 existing homes and vacation of a segment of 25'" Street as proposed would impact the existing neighborhood adversely. This would not be compatible with the slllTOunding residential area, and therefore would conflict with General Plan Objective 1.37. General Plan Objective 1.6 states: "It shall be the objective ofthe City of San Bernardino to control the dcvelopment of land uses which may adversely impact the character of the City and quality of life of its residents." Although it is often necessary to demolish existing structures and displace residents and businesses from existing neighborhoods to provide much-needed public facilities, development of the site proposed for Wilson II Elementary School would be detrimental to the character of the City and the quality of life of its residents. Most of the sites proposed by the District for development of new schools require displacement of ", 1_ _ _ c General Plan Consistency Determination Wllsun II Elementary School 511. Planning Commission Hearing Dale: 7/19/05 Pag. 4 residents and other existing facilities. However, these other sites generally exhibit a wide variety of building types and varying levels of property maintenance, interspersed with vacant parcels. The site proposed for development of Wilson II Elementary School is part of a fully developed, stable and cohesive neighborhood, evidenced by the high level of owner occupancy. It is a fine example of a 70-yr. old neighborhood that has stood the test of time and continues to thrive. Intrusion into this neighborhood with the demolition of 40 homes would also eliminate numerous examples of Tudor Revival and California Bungalow architecture that currently enhance the character oflhe community. General Plan Policy 8.7.1 states: "It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to monitor the residential growth of the City and work with the local school districts to expand facilities and services to meet educational needs." The City has been a willing and active partner in site selection for various school facilities planned by the San Bernardino City Unified School District to meet the educational needs of the residents of San Bernardino. The site selected by the District for development of Wilson II is not consistent with General Plan Objectives 1.37 and 1.6. The City has proposed alternate locations for the District to consider, and the City is willing to continue working with the District to identify an appropriate alternative site, pursuant to Policy 8.7. J. CONCLUSION The goals and policies of the General Plan suppon development of school facilities, as needed to serve the community. The site proposed by the San Bernardino City Unified School District would serve the student enrollment demand nom surrounding neighborhoods. However, it would have unacceptable impacts on the neighborhood selected for acquisition, to the detriment of the surrounding community. StatT is recommending a finding that development of Wilson II Elementary School, as proposed, would not be consistent with the General Plan, based on the following concerns about the particular site under consideration: . The proposal would break up a stable neighborhood with 80"11. owner occupancy, something the City of San Bernardino is striving to achieve in other areas. . The proposal would require vacation of25" Street, making 26m Street the first available east-west street between "F" and "G" streets nonh of Highland Avenue. Local circulation is already impeded by Arrowview Middle School. · The existing neighborhood is already impacted by traffic related to dropping off and picking up students at Arrowview Middle School. Addition of another school site at the proposed location will increase this traffic. . The location of Arrowview Middle school on a major thoroughfare increases the potential for outside influences on the middle school students, including exposure to ;.... e e c General Plan ConsislC'ncy Determination Wilson II Elementary School Site PlaMing Commission Hearing Dale: 7'19/05 Page 5 gangs. Tne Police Department recommends against introducing elementary school students adjacent to this particular middle school. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make a finding that acquisition of the site proposed for development of Wilson II Elementary School is not consistent with the City General Plan. Respectfully submitted, l!!:f:~' ~ tvJr- Director of Development Services ~(/Jg Terri Rahhal Principal Planner Attachment A Letter received June 24, 2005, requesting consistency determination on behalf of the San Bernardino City Unified School District Location Map General Plan Land Use Map Conceptual Site Plan Attachment B Attachment C Attachment 0 URS C _ June 9.2005 ATTACHMENT A Mr. James Funk. Director Development Services Department City of San Bernardino 300 :-.Iorth "D" Streel, 3,d Floor San Bernardino. California 92418 Subject: Notice of Proposed Development of Three Schools and Request for General Plan Conformity Finding (Public Resources Code Seclion 21151.2 and California Government Code Section 65402.a) Dear Planning Commission: URS Corporation CURS) is presently serving as the environmental consultant to the San Bernardino City Unified School District (the District) to assist in the District's commitment to the California Environmental Quality Act and the required environmental analysis. for the three proposed elementary school sites: Alessandro II. Burbank n, and Wilson n. - Pursuant to Government Code Section 65402.a, and Public Resources Code Section 21151.2, the District is required to request of the Planning Commission having jurisdiction where the proposed schools are located, notice in writing of the school sites acquisition. Accordingly, this letter shall serve as formal notice of the proposed acquisitions, as well as a request that the Planning Commission provide wrinen findings to the District that the sites are in conformity with Ihe jurisdiction's adopted General Plan, within 40 days of this letter. I. Alessandro n: The Proposed Alessandro n Elementary School Site is located southwest of the intersection of Baseline Street and Herrington A venue in the County of San Bernardino. California. The proposed project consists of 40 parcels, and comprises approximately 601,]28 square feet, or approximately 13.8 acres. The proposed elementary school will total 32 classrooms and would provide education facilities for 900 studenlll 'in grades K-6. The jurisdiction's General Plan designates the subject site as Residential Suburban District (RS) and Commercial General District (CG-I). 2. Burbank II: The Proposed Burbank n Elementary School Site is located between West Riallo Avenue, South Allen Street, Valley Street, and Waterman Avenue in the County of San Bernardino, California. The proposed project consists of 43 parcels and comprises approximately 435,600 square feet, or approximately 10.0 acres. The proposed elementary school will total 20 classrooms and would provide education facilities for 600 students in grades K-6. The jurisdiction's General Plan designates the subject site as Residential Low District (RL) and Office Industrial Park District (OIP). e c IJRS Grc.IJ'1./nc. 10'23 Bl:!'l Court Rcn:t!nCur:..nonca, CA 'tli.l1"J Tel 909._.4000 F.. 909.960.1399 oo~@rnaw[g@ JUN H ruC5 CITY OF SAN IlEIIH"RO.NO OIVELO""~NT SERVICES OEPAIlTMENr URS Ce Mr. James Funk, Director Development Services Department City of San Bernardino June 9, 2005 Page 2 J. Wilson II: The Proposed Wilson II Elementary School Site is located northwest of the intersection of "F" and 251h Streets in the County of San Bernardino, California. . The proposed project consists of 41 parcels, and comprises approximately 370,260 square feet, or approximately 8.5 acres. The proposed elementary school will total 32 classrooms and would provide education facilities for 900 students in grades K-6. The jurisdiction's General Plan designates the subject site as Residential Suburban (RS). The attached figures show the location and conceptual site plans for each of the proposed projects. Your prompt attention to this request for review is appreciated. If there are any questions or need for further information, please call me at (909) 980-4000. Sincerely, URS e~~ Jeffiy S. Rice, AICP Manager, Environmental and Planning e c Attachments: Figure I, Regional Vicinity Map -. Alessandro II Figure 2, Project Location Map - Alessandro II Figure 3, Project Land Use Map - Alessandro II Figure I, Regional Vicinity Map - Burbank II Figure 2, Project Location Map - Burbank II Figure 3, Project Land Use Map - Burbank II Figure I, Regional Vicinity Map - Wilson II Figure 2, Project Location Map - Wilson II Figure 3, Project Land Use Map - Wilson II Cc: Melinda Pure, Facilities Planning and Development, SBCUSD Wael Elatar, Facilities Administrator, SBCUSD Terry Gardner, TLG Rcal Estate/Public Finance ,. , .L'~ ~,."~~/,:'I . r I. -;-,';! ~. '~I'.:.""'p.a ATTACHMENT B . ~ V"fJl!:I!'I'J',...r ---';-'~""''''''':I i. ii" ~i; I..!. ~Ii ~ 1 \:.J ~ _~ I <II .1 "I fLt -Ja... --~~II J -"'![llr.;". :ttJl- Li-..' ~ I,. 1 [ ... .?1 . ~ "" .~ '-. .: f l... ~~? ~ . ~ j;"~" I~a '. .~ \ . ~"'" _,~( M.. . . . .~ I , \ll~ i.. '-A~-;-'- . h \ _. .~' ~ i':~ '--' - I .. . ..... . 'J...... I ,I' . . - . ~A -~ - c f " ~, -. 'r\;- I--~~ . ".!, . - . "'- ;. ~ .,. >;.~ . L....nd e E_,.,_ @-- eHighSdlool ... -- c:J 2 _ 'adIUa o CllyolS8nlle.......... o CGunly oIS8n_ Dplllc ~ N N.T.S. c URS ApriI2005 f . .-t:. ~4 II ~ ,,'. 1".1 ,- ;..... ..~ ~~~ -, ~fj:,~ ~.~: L'. ,,,,,' e.,~ , ..Fi<'" . - '. " . ~ i~ :... I I..lj , , " ~J . . !...I'-.' . ~ ... . . I "".....I__ntory . P-~,..y 3_~ 4 0-... E_"'f I!I_EIo.._y . _lngtnmE~ .. _veil E_lIry 8 RileyElomo",,",y . _mlincalnE~ 1 0 RIIoy E'-"-Y II __ ao....,""'y US G-.1I8IIoy M_ OO -- , 4 S8n IIemonIlno High PROJECT LOCATION Wilson II Elementary School San Bemanfll10 City Unified School District Figure 2 ~{l ;~ i ATTACHMENT C CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: Wilson II PLANNING DIVISION Elementary LOCATION MAP LAND USE DISTRICTS HEARING DATE: 7/19/05 LJ NORTH . j ~r:.':I 'It:;;' ,::\ 'f , , . 0_ -- e c ..\ N Feet o 50 100 200 PROPOSED PROJECT SITE PLAN Wilson II Elementary School San Bernardino City Unified School District April 2005 Figure 3 I i I., ,',\l",. ii. q be -e "- e c City of SaD BerDardioo San Bernardino Police Department Interoffice MemoraDdum EXHIBIT 5 -:j@lD) ~ . .r", &JIUO . ~.~h ;CES :_,;r=;lT To: Valerie Ross. Senior Planner From: !' Subject: Wilson II Proposed School Site Date: July 14, 2005 Copies: Maryanne Milligan, City Attorney's Office I feel it is important that the Police Department share some concerns this agency has over the location selected for the proposed Wilson II School. During a previous meeting between City slaff and San Bernardino City School District (SBCSD) staff, it was disclosed that the SBCSD was planning on constructing Wilson II Elementary School north of the existing Arrowview Middle School, south of 26'h Street, east of G Street and west of F Street. The Police Department has concerns with the construction of a new elementary school in that area for the following reasons: . · This will build a school next to the middle school, which is located on a main street (Highland). That school, due to I) its fronting Highland and 2) the age of the attendees, will attract gang members and other suspects who like to hang around schools. Needless to say, that issue could have an impact on the students attending the elementary school as well as additional public safety problems for the Police Department. · This is predominately a residential area. Thus, the traffic patterns created in the neighborhoods by parents who pick up and drop of kids will significantly impact the neighborhood. That issue has become a major problem for neighborhoods throughout Southern California as it really impacts people who live in the surrounding community. · Finally, it will close the east/west streets north of the existing Arrowview Middle School- thereby causing residents and drivers to go several blocks before they can access some of the surrounding neighborhoods or streets. TIlE S8PO IS COMMITTED TO PROVIOING: PROGRESSIVE QUALITY POLICE SERVICE; A SAFE ENVIRONMENT TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE; ^ REDUCTION IN ("RIME TIlROUGH PROBLEM REUKiNITrON AND PROBLEM SOLVING cf' e .- ~ EXHIBIT 6 DEVELOPMEl'o. SERncES DEPARTMENT 300 NOllh "0" Street. San BernardIno' CA 92418.0001 Planning & Building 909.384.5057. Fax 9093845080 Public WorkslEngineenng 9O!I.384.511l' Fax: 909384.5155 www.sbClly.org w July 15.2005 VIA FASCnllLE AND U.S, MAIL I ., . Mr. Wael Elatar Facilities Administrator San Bernardmo City Unified School District 777 North "F" Street San Bernardmo. CA 92410 Re: Proposed School Sites Dear Mr. Elatar: -'.. On Jun'e.2l. 2005. I sent you a leller requesting copies of the environmental documents for the proposed Burbank II and Alessandro II elementary schools. This leller indicated that I believed that the City IS a responsible agency under CEQA and as a responsible agency has both the right and the dUly under CEQA to review and comment on the environmental documents for these proposed school sites. To date. I have not received a response to my inquiry or the environmental documents. I recentlr became aware from thci CEQAnet database through the Governor's O(fice' of PIanJ)ing and Research that the public review and comment period ends on July 14. 2005 for the above two schools. I further noticed that the revle-.' period for the proposed Wilson II elementary school is from June 21. 2005 through July 20.2005. However. the City has not received a :-lot ice oflntcnt for any of these schools. Without the opportunity to review the environmental documents and comment on potential environmental impacts and recommend mitigation measures, if any. the City as a responsible agency. cannot represent that we can provide services necessary to these sites. In addition to the above. proceeding with the environmental delennination for Wilson II is especially problematic The City has repeatedly told the District that it has concerns with the ->e ~e i.- e ,,-. \.....- SBCl'SD Proposed S.:hoo/ SItes July 15. 2iJ05 PJg~ 2 proposed locallon of this school, Presumably, the environmental document addresses the vacation of 25'. Streel and Berkeley Avenue to accommodate the school, The City has repeatedly told the District that the City cannot suppon, and strongly opposes these street vacations for numerous reasons, including but not limited to the urunitigable impact on traffic on surrounding streets as a result of these street closures. As it appears that the District failed to follow proper procedures under CEQA by sending any envirorunental documents to the City who is a responsible agency under CEQA, the City hereby reserves the right to raise any issues which it could have raised during the comment period in any future litigation that may be filed on behalf of City andlor City Municipal Water Department. Funherrnore, as a responsible agency, the City' is again requesting that the City be seilt all notices of intent or notices of preparation of an EIR as well as any other environmental documents for any future school sites located in the City of San Bernardino. In closing, the City and City Municipal Water Depannient are formally opposed to the adoption of Negative Declarations for Burbank II, Alessandro II, and Wilson n elementary schools and are requesting that the District extend the review period for at least an additionalthiny (30) days to allow the City and Water District to properly respond 10 these environmental documents. Sincerely, V~ (;.~ '" Valerie C. Ross Deputy Director/City Planner c: Members oflhe SB.C.U.S.D. Board of Education Arturo Delgado, Superintendent, S.B.C.U.S.D. Judith Valles, Mayor James F. Perunan, Cily Atiorney Fred Wilson. City Adminislrator James Funk. De\'elopment Services Director Henry Empei'lo, Sr. Deputy City Allomey Marianne Milligan, Deputy City Allomey Slacey Aldstadt. General Manager, San Bernardino Municipal Water Depanment '. . ---.. _ ----- .---- ------------_.- - - --..--.------- , . -- ce e c EXHIBIT 7 JL Arturo Delgado, Ed.D. SUperintendent John A. Peukert, Asslltant Superintendent. FacllitieslOpermions July 18, 2005 Via Hand Delivery and e-mail Valerie C. Ross. Deputy Director/City Planner Development Services Department City of San Bernardino 300 N. "D" StRet San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001 Subject: Identified School Sites Refer to: City orSan Bernardino Development Services Department letter, dated July 15,2005 Dear Ms. Ross, . Your letter, referenced above, wss received at my office via fax on July IS, 2005. In your letter, you refer to an earlier letter from you to me, dated June 21, 2005. I and my staft" were not aware of this letter. We bave conducted a search of our fila: cannot find your letter or a record of receiviDs this letter; and have not bad the opportunity to address any request you made in this letter. In response to your current letter, we want you to know that the District desires the City's engagement in such important matters ss the current one. We are pleued to extend the review and comment period for the City for thirty days from the date of your letter through Monday, August IS, 2005. We win usume that this extension is acceptsble to the City of San Bernardino unless we hear otherwise from you by the close of business on July 21". Copies of the mitigated negative declaration repolU for the Alessandro II, Burbenk II and Wilson II school sites are attached for your review and comment. We would like to suggest a meeting within two weeks to address any preliminary issues or concerns that the City might bave identified regarding Ihese repolU. One objective of that meeting would be to attempt to resolve most or all of the City's issues, if any, prior to the end oftbe review period. A second objective would be to establish any necessary follow-up meetings within the review period. Pleue be sssured that the School District hu always tried to k~ the City involved in new school location and construction matters. In fact, ss recently ss June 16 , the City Attorney's office made various requests including a written request for the status on CEQA for two of the three identified new school sites that you referred to in your letter: Wilson II and Alessandro II (copy attached). As pert of our response to. that request, the District made available exclusively to the City oriainaIs of the entire negative mitigation repoIU, ~eipt of which wss acknowledged in writing by the City staff. As far as we Icnow, these originals are still in possession of the City. It is apparent from your letter, however, that availability of these originals at the City might not have been brought to your attention. FACIUT1ES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 7n North F Street. Sin 1lemanIno, CA 92410. (909) 381-1238 . Fax (909) 1185-4218 waeI.eIalarOsbcusd.kI2,CB.U5 te r:!I e ~' "- Please also nole that, in compliance with the law, the District also made copies available for review by the public at both the Board of Education building front counter at 777 F Street and the City of San Bernardino Public Library located at 555 West 6. Street. We also forwarded 12 copies of the documents to the Slate Clearing House for Slate-wide notification. Our actions obviously did not achieve the result desired by both the City and lI!e School District. In order to make this proc:ess more eftbctive, the School District commits to involving the City as early as practicable in each new school construction project. Also, we would like to extend our offer to meet with the City staft' on a regular basis to include all future new school land acquisition and construction projects within the city limits. In order to expedite our response to your letter, we are delivering this letter and the three negative declaration reports in both electronic format (via e-mail) and in hardcopy (via hand delivery). Piease feel free to use e-mail as well as hardcopy transmittals for future requests and follow-up actioas. Also, I and my staff'are available by telephone at (909) 381-1238 and by fax at (909) 885-4218. I look forward to working with you on this current matter and on all future matters involving the City and the School District. Sincerely, ~ Wael Elatar Facilities Administrator cc: Members of the SBCUSD Board of Education Arturo Delgado, Superintendent, SBCUSD - Judith Valles, Mayor. City of San Bernardino James F. 'Penman, City Attorney, City of San Bernardino Fred Wilson, City Administrator, City of San Bernardino James Funk, Development Services Director. City of San Bernardino Henry Empcfto, Sr Deputy City Anomey, City of San Bernardino Marianne Milligan. Deputy City Attorney, City of San Bernardino Stacey Aldstadt. General Manager. San Bernardino Municipal Water Department ~ c Cheryl Brown John C oute Kenneth Durr A lfredo Enciso Larry Heasley Jim Morris. Vice-Chair Roger Powell Mike Sauerbrun. Chair CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92418 Phone: (909) 384-5057/5071 . Fax: (909) 384-5080 1. 2. 3. C 4. 5. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 19,2005 PLANNING AND ZONING LETTER NO. 05-05 (APPEAL NO. 05-10) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10296 (EXTENSION OF TIME NO. 05-01) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 04-32 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 05-09 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 05-10 GENERAL PLAN AMENDEMENT NO. 05-03, DEVELOPMENT PERMIT II NO. 05-05, & LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 05-05 6. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION - MONTEREY II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 7. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION - ALESSANDRO II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 8. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION - BURBANK II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 9. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION - WILSON II ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - I""... Page 1 7/19/05 c c c The meeting was called to order by Commissioner Sauerbrun at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Present: Commissioners Brown, Coute. Durr, Heasley, Morris. and Sauerbrun. Absent: Commissioners Enciso and Powell. Staff Present: Valerie Ross, Deputy Director/City Planner; Aron Liang, Senior Planner; Ben Steckler, Associate Planner; Brian Foote, Assistant Planner; Henry Empeilo, Deputy City Attorney; James Funk, Director; Terri Rahhal, Principal Planner; and Linda Dortch, Development Services Technician. Commissioner Durr led the flag salute. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH Brian Foote, Assistant Planner, administered the oath. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA There were no public comments. IV. CONSENT AGENDA Valerie Ross, Deputy Director/City Planner stated that Items 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 were recommended for the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Conte pulled Item 3 for discussion. Commissioner Brown stated that she would abstain on Items 6, 7, 8, and 9. Commissioner Durr made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Heasley seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Brown, Coute, Durr, Enciso, Heasley, Morris, and Sauerbrun. Nays: None. Absent: Commissioners Enciso and Powell. 2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10296 (EXTENSION OF TIME NO. 05-0n - A request for a one year extension of time from February 4, 2005 to February 4, 2006 to subdivide approximately 3 acres of land into 12 lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet located at the northeast corner of Mill and Macy Streets in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district. Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA, Section 15332-Infill Development Dave & Julie Fitzpatrick K&C Ventures, Inc. 0142-151-11,12, & 17, and 0142-361-08 3 Owner: Applicant: APN: Ward: Page 2 7/19/05 c Planner: Ben Steckler The Planning Commission approved a one-year extension of time from February 4, 2005 to February 4, 2006 for Tentative Tract Map No. 10296 based on the previously adopted Findings of Fact and approved Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements with revised Public Works Requirements (Attachment E). 6. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION - A request from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for a determination that development of the proposed Monterey II Elementary School would be consistent with the City General Plan. The site is approximately 17 acres, located on the north side of Ninth Street, approximately 500 feet east of Tippecanoe Avenue in the RM, Residential Medium land use district. Environmental Determination: Owner: Applicant: APN: Ward: Planner: Not Subject to CEQA SB Schools Finance Corp. San Bernardino City Unified School District 0278-061-72,68 I Terri Rahhal The Planning Commission continued the General Plan Consistency Determination for ,- Monterey II Elementary School indefinitely. \...- c 7. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION - A request from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for a determination that land acquisition and development of the proposed Alessandro II Elementary School would be consistent with the City General Plan. The site is approximately 13.8 acres, located at the southwest comer of Baseline Street and Herrington Avenue in the RS, Residential Suburban and CG-2, Commercial General land use districts. Environmental Determination: Owner: Applicant: APN: Ward: Planner: Not Subject to CEQA Various San Bernardino City Unified School District 40 parcels 6 Terri Rahhal The Planning Commission continued the General Plan Consistency Determination for Alessandro II Elementary School indefinitely. 8. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION - A request from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for a determination that land acquisition and development of the proposed Burbank II Elementary School would be consistent with the City General Plan. The site is approximately 10 acres, located at the southeast comer Page 3 7/19/05 c c c of Rialto Avenue and Allen Street in the RS. Residential Suburban and OIP, Office Industrial Park land use districts. Environmental Determination: Owner: Applicant: APN: Ward: Planner: Not Subject to CEQA Various San Bernardino City Unified School District 43 parcels I Terri Rahhal The Planning Commission continued the General Plan Consistency Determination for Burbank II Elementary School indefinitely. 9. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION - A request from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for a determination that land acquisition and development of the proposed Wilson II Elementary School would be consistent with the City General Plan. The site is approximately 8.5 acres, bounded by "F" Street on the east, "G" Street on the west, 26th Street on the north and Arrowview Middle School on the south in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district. Environmental Determination: Owner: Applicant: APN: Ward: Planner: Not Subject to CEQA Various San Bernardino City Unified School District 41 parcels 7 Terri Rahhal The Planning Commission continued the General Plan Consistency Determination for Wilson II Elementary School indefinitely. IV. AGENDA ITEMS 1. PLANNING AND ZONING LETTER NO. 05-05 (APPEAL NO. 05-10) - An appeal of the Director's determination that a four-plex apartment structure located at 2194 N. McKinley Avenue in the PCR, Public Commercial Recreation land use district has lost its non-conforming status. (Continued from June 21,2005) Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA, Section 15301-Existing Facility Dion Graham 1191-021-29 7 Ben Steckler Owner/Applicant: APN: Ward: Planner: Page 4 7/19/05 c c c Tuesday, August 2, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, First Floor, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. [8:53 p.m.) Minutes Adopted by: Planning Commissioners: Brown, Coute, Heasley, Morris, and Sauerbrun Date Approved: September 7, 2005 Minutes Prepared by: Linda Dortch Development Services Technician Page 13 7/19/05