The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMaster Facilities Plan - January 2006 [ [ E m E I t t I E E I ~ I I I t t t Master Facilities Plan for the City of San Bernarqino, California January, 2006 evenue ost pecialists, LLC Serving Local Governments Since 1975 t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Master Facilities Plan for the City of San Bernardino, California January, 2006 Copyrigbt, 2006 by Revenue &: Cost SpecWists, L.L.C. All rigbts reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyrigbt hereon may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means -- graphic, electronic, mechanical, including any photocopying, recording, taping or taping or information storage and retrieval systems without written permission of: Revenue &: Cost Specialists, L.L. C. 2545 East Chapman Avenue, Suite 103 Fullerton, CA 92831 (714) 992-9020 ~ E E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Seroing Local Governments Since 1975 January 6, 2006 Honorable Mayor and City Council Via Mr. Fred Wilson, City Administrator City of San Bernardino 300 North "0" Street . San Bernardino, CA 92418 RE: City of San Bemardino Master Facilities Plan Honorable Mayor. City Council, and City Administrator Wilson, The following Document, the proposed Master Facilities Plan (MFP) is hereby submitted for City Council review and consideration. The proposed MFP is the result of many hours of work between City staff and Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.c. staff. This document represents a long-range program of identification and recognition of the entirety of infrastructure and physical needs necessary to meet the service demand of an ever-growing residential population and business community. The information included in the proposed MFP is primarily based on the City of San Bernardino Comprehensive General Plan and other official documents. The City's five-year Capital Improvement Plan and the proposed Development Impact Fees will be a function of the entire list of proposed projects listed in this document. Stated in a slightly different way, the list of projects contained herein, needs to be agreed to by the City Council in order to increase the validity of both of the two above mentioned documents. The Capital Facility Plan contains the following: . A Table of Contents . A Guide to the Master Facilities Plan . A Summary Schedule · A section containing the future Law Enforcement Faci!itics. Vehicles and Equipmem capital needs · A section containing the future Fire Suppression Faci!itics, Vehicles and E'fllipment capital needs Internet: www.revenuecost.com Voice 714.992.9020 2545 E. Chapman Avenue. Suite 103 . Fullerton, CA 92831 Fax 714.992.9021 t E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page Two, January 6, 2006 Master Facilities Plan Letter to the City of San Bernardino . A section containing both local and regional future Circulation System (Streets, Signals and Bridges) projects . A section containing the future Library and Collection improvements . A section containing the future Public Use Facilities project needs . A section containing the future Aquatics Center Facilities project needs . A section containing the future Parkland and Open Space Acquisition and Park Improvement projects RCS appreciates the efforts of the following staff for their assistance In generating the information provided within this report. Mike Eckley, Public Safety Systems Manager Robert G. Eisenbeisz, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer Mat Fratus, Fire Battalion Chief Julie Jensen, Administrative Analyst - Police Department Mark Lancaster, RCE, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engilleer Teresa Martin, Administrative Services Manager - Parks, Recreatioll and Community Services Department Lynn Parker, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer Larry Pitzer, Fire Chief Terri Rahhal, Principal Plallller Lemuel Randolph, Parks, Recreatioll and Community Services Director Dennis Reicl,ardt, Deputy Fire Chief Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Administrator Dan Ustatioll, Park Superintendent Gwendolyn Waters, Police Lieutenant We look forward to meeting with the City Council in order to implement and achieve maximum use of this comprehensive plan. Sincerely, o=~~ SCOTT THORPE Senior Vice President t m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E . . j City of San BemardiDo Ie; Master Facilities Plan Table of COIlats JfjrMfHMM::::{;:~i ...............'_..-......._...;.-.. .....-,.........-..:...-..... :;::{:::::::/;::;::::::::;::: ..........'_.._,.-,-.,..... .,.. ..,...-,...........--..'...-- ........,"...,.......-..'... -.,_.... :~}~t~t:Rttt:~~ ............. ......... :":::::":';:;::::::~:::::::; ,,::;,:,::-:::::,::::-::;:::::::': ..............----......'" .. ..........------,...,.....'..'.-.. .-.....".......-....." -. :.:.:~-:-,.:.:.:.:.. ... .-.-..........,....,...,......,..._....-..,...... .. ..... .-,'n-,', ._._n........... Guide to the Master Facilities Plan 1 Project Cost Summary 7 Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Jl Law Enforr:ement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary 12 LE-{}l EKpand Law Enforcement Facilities Space 13 LE-{}2 Acquim AdditiODal Patro1JDetl:ctivelSpecialtv Vehicles 14 LE-{}3 Acquim Officer Assigned Equipment IS LE-<J4 Acquim Advanced Computer/Data Sharing Systems 16 LE-05 Police StatiOl1 Debt Service 17 Fire SuppressiOl1 Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment 18 Fire SuppressiOl1 Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary 19 FD-()1 New Fire StatiOl1 #233 20 FD-()2 New Fire StatiOl1 #233 Response Fleet 21 FD-()3 Relocate Fire Station #221 22 FD--04 Expand Fire StatiOl1 #224 23 FD-(JS Relocate Fire Station #226 24 , FD-()6 Relocate Fire StatiOl1 #229 25 FD-()7 Relocate Fire StatiOl1 #230 26 FD-()8 Renovate StatiOl1 #221 as AdministrativelMaintenance Facility 27 FD-09 COI1Struct a Vehicle Storage Building 28 FD-10 Construct Training Facility 29 FD-ll Acquim Two Command Vehicles 30 FIr12 Acquim Four Squad Vehicles 31 FD-13 Acquim Three Sedans and a Utility Truck 32 FD-14 Acquim a Reserve Engine 33 FD-lS Acquim Additional Assigned Fire-fighter Equipment 34 FD-16 Headquarters StatiOl1 #221 Debt Service 3S FIr17 VeniemOl1t StatiOl1 #232 Debt Service 36 Circulation System (Streets, Signals and Bridges) 37 CirculatiOl1 System Cost Summary 38 ST -1Jl 40th Street, Acre Lane to Electric A venue 42 ST -1J2 Sth Street, Sterling to Victoria 43 ST -1J3 Sth Street, Warm Creek to Pedley 44 Iii ./. .. .. <.. ....<<.... / ./.......... . . .m<1 ....... Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 t E I , - E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E .. ~I City of San BemardiDo I; . Master Facilities PJan ... Table of COIlll:Dts . ST -{)4 Alabama Street, 3rd to City Limits 45 ST -{)5 Campus Parkway (Pt;ppeJ Lindell), ~,."""" to I 215 46 ST-{)6 Central (Palm Meadows), TippecaI10c to MounlJUn View 47 ST -D7 CoulstOll, TippecaI10c to MOU1JIJUn View 48 ST -D8 COI1I1eCtor, 3rd Street to 5th Street 49 ST -(}9 Del Rosa, 6th Street to 9th Street 50 ST-lO Electric, MounlJUn View to Nortbpark 51 ST-ll -G- Street, Mill to Rialto Avenue 52 ST-12 "H" Street, KendaH to 40th 53 ST-13 Kendall, Cambridge to Pine 54 ST-14 Lena Road, Mill to Orange Show 55 ST-15 Little League Drive, Palm to [-215 56 ST-16 Little League Drive, [-215 frontJJge tOBelmOllt 57 ST-J7 Little MOU1JIJUn, Devil Creek Chatmel to 48th 58 ST -18 Mill, Pepper to Meridian 59 ST-19 Mount VemOll Bridge " , 60 ST -20 MOU1JIJUn View, ThompsOll to Electric 61 ST-21 MOU1JIJUn View Bridge at Mission Creek 62 ST-22 MOU1JIJUn View, Riverview to Central 63 ST-23 MounlJUn View, [-10 to San BemardinoAve. 64 ST-24 MOU1JIJUn View Avenue Railroad Grade Crossing 65 ST-25 Palm, Cajon to [-215 SB Ramp 66 ST-26 Pine, KendaH to Belmont 67 ST-27 PeTTis Hill Park Road, 21st to Pacific 68 ST -28 R1mcho. Colton City Limits to 5th 69 ST -29 Rialto, Sierra to Waterma1l 70 ST - 30 Rialto, Lena to TippecaI10e 71 F ST-31 State Street, 16th to Foothill 72 ST - 32 State Street. Foothill to [-215 73 ST-33 Tippecanoe, Mill to Harriman 74 I IIST-34 University Parkway, Hallmark to BNSF Grade Separation 75 I IST-35 Waterma1l, 5th to Baseli"e 76 ST-36 Victoria. Richardson to MounlJUn View 77 ST-37 Traffic Signal @ Little League Drive and 1-215 Frontage 78 ST-38 Traffic Signal @ Little League Drive and Belmont 79 .. ........~.................ii..............................................~....... . xii .. Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 .. i- S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E ~T~' ...-......-..-......,..-..-.....-..-...'-..-..--,-.-.'.',-, .;:<-.;--.,:;.-:;-,.,..-:-:<-:-;....-...,..,-:..-:-.._...-':.:. .... ... .. .,.-,...,...,-.,-...,...,..--.--..............".....'.-,.... ................,...-......-'---'-.-'.'-..-..-...-.-...-.-...-..... . ...-...-.........................'.,.:...,-,.._..:.:.;.:.:-:.,-:.,-,.,.,.....:.:.".;.;.,.,.:.:.:.: . ..... .......".,... City of San Bemardino I Master Facilities Plan Table of COIJteDts . ..... ST-39 Traffic Signal fiJ Palm and CajOlJ 80 ST -40 Traffic Signal fiJ Palm and Industrial . 81 ST-41 Traffic Signal fiJ Palm and ]-215 ramps 82 ST -42 Traffic Signal fiJ Palm and IrvingtOlJ 83 ST-43 Traffic Signal fiJ Palm and BelmOlJt 84 ST -44 Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway (hPJ'Gl-LiDdeD) and Industrial 85 ST -45 Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway (PeppeJ-LiDdeD) and 1 215 Ramps 86 ST-46 Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway and Nortbpark 87 ST -47 Traffic Signal fiJ Sierra (CSUSB) and Nortbpark 88 ST -48 Traffic Signal @ ~crulRl1 and 48th 89 ST-49 Traffic Signal fiJ Little Mountain and 30th 90 ST-50 Traffic Signal @ Little Mountain and 48th 91 ST-51 Traffic Signal @ Little Mountain and Nortbpark 92 ST-52 Traffic Signal fiJ State and ]-210 93 ST-53 Traffic Signal fiJ Merdian and Rialto 94 ST-54 Traffic Signal fiJ Macy and Mill 95 ST-55 Traffic Sip @ Rancho (State) and FootbiH 96 ST-56 Traffic Signal @ Miramonte and 27th 97 ST-57 Traffic Sip @ Mountain and Kendall 98 ST-58 Traffic Signal fiJ Mountain and 48th 99 ST-59 Traffic Signal fiJ Mountain and Nortbpark 100 ST -60 Traffic Sip @ "r Street and Inland Center Drive 101 ST-fi1 Traffic Signal @ "H" Street and Marshall 102 ST --fi2 Traffic Sip fiJ Auto Plaza and Fairway 103 ST-fi3 Traffic Sip fiJ "E" Street and Century 104 I ST -64 Traffic Signal fiJ "E" Street and Orange Show Lane 105 ST --fi5 Traffic Sip fiJ Arrowhead and Orange Show Lane 106 I ST --fi6 Traffic Sip @ Arrowhead and Central 107 ST --fi7 Traffic Signal fiJ Mountain View and 13th 108 'ST-fi8 Traffic Signal fiJ Mountain View and Marshall 109 ! .jST-fi9 Traffic Signal @ Electric and 48th 110 i) i IST-70 Traffic Signal fiJ Dolittle and Mill III , , ,sT-71 Traffic Signal @ Lena and Orange Show Road 112 I ST-72 Traffic Signal @ Lena and Central 113 ST 73 Traffic Signal fiJ Lena and Rialto 114 .. ...... Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 ... .. E E I I I I I I I I E E I I I I I E ~I ...-....-.-...-.,.-.-...-.... ....-.........,.....-......... ...d..........'?:'-.:..:. . ..- .-...............,' .......--......-.-... City of San Bemardino Master Facilities Plan Table of COlJll:Dts ST -74 Traffic Signal @ Lena and 3rd ST -75 Traffic Signal @ East Camegie and Hospital Lane ST-76 Traffic Signal @ Tippecanoe and Rialto ST -77 Traffic Signal @ Del Rosa and Marsball ST-7B Traffic Signal f/I Del Rosa and 6th ST -79 Traffic Signal @ Sterling and Marsball ST -80 Traffic Signal @ Sterling and Lynwood ST-81 Traffic Signal @Sterlingand6th ST -82 Traffic Signal @ S. Mountain View and Central (Palm Meadows) ST-83 Traffic Signal @S. Mountain View and ]-10 Westbound Ramp ST -84 Traffic Signal @ Guthrie and Paciiic ST-85 IntercbangelRamps @]-215 and Palm Avenue (SB, County) ST-86 Intercbange/Ramps @]-215andPepper LiDdeD (Campus Parkway) (SB) ST-87 IntercbangelRamps @]-215and UDiversity Parkway (SB, County) ST -88 IntercbangelRamps @ ]-210 and Waterman (SB, Highland, County) ST -89 IntercbangelRamps @ ]-210 and Del Rosa (SB, Highland, County) ST -90 IntercbangelRamps @ ]-210 and Victoria (SB, Highland, County) 1..IST-91 IntercbangelRamps @]-210and 5th (SB, Higbland, Red1ands) ST-92 IntercbangelRamps @ ]-10 and Tippecanoe ST-93 IntercbangelRamps @]-10andPepper(SB, County, Colton) ST-94 IntercbangelRamps @ ]-10 and Mountain View (SB, Loma Linda, Red1ands, Co ST -95 Tippecanoe Bridge over the Santa ADa River ST-96 Grade Separation @Palm.Avenue (SB) ST-97 Grade Separation @Rialto(SB) ST-98 Grade Separation f/I State Street/UDiversity (SB) ST -99 Grade Separation @ Hunts Lane (SB, Colton) ST -100 Grade Separation @ Rancho A venue Library Facilities and Collection Library Facilities and Collection Cost Summary !LB-{)l General Library Square Foot Expansion 'LB-{)2 Expansion of Library Collection . LB-{)3 M1Iin Library Debt Service Public Use Facilities iPublic Use Facilities Cost Summary ICC-{)1 Public Use Facilities Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 '" , .. E E E I I I I I E I I I I I I I I I ~~ City of San BemardiDo Master Facilities Plan Table of CODteDts .. ,- .--.-.-........ ...-...-.... ..... '," '.....;...-.;.:-'...:...:.:.:..':.:.:.:.,...;.;.:.;.:.:::.:.:::;::,:::::~~:::::::::.;::.:.;_.,,:-:,.., . CC-{)2 DeImaIIn Heights Gymnasium CC-03 NicbolSOl1 CommU11ity Center CC-(}4 Construct Additiooal Public Use Space Aquatic Facilities Aquatic Facilities Cost S AQ-{Jl Construct Water Pool/Attraction AQ-{J2 Construct Locker/Administration Building Park Land AcquisitiOll and Development Park Land AcquisitiOll and Development Cost SU111l1JJUJ' PK-ol Construct Six 5.0 Acre Neighborhood Parks PK -02 Construct Seven 10.0 Acre Passive CommU11ity Parks PK-03 Construct Four 25.0 Acre Active (sports) CJ)l1J11JU11ity Parks PK -(}4 Miscellaneous Park Improvements PK-05 Open Space AcquisitiOll (159.4 acres) Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. ~c ~ 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 Fullerton, CA 92831 r .. E C I I E I I I I I E I I I I I I ; CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GUIDE TO THE MASTER FACILITIES PLAN The Master Facilities Plan is a compilation of projects identified by City staff as being needed by the . City of San Bernardino through theoretical General Plan build-out ofthe City. The Plan is based on input from City staff, recommended projects contained in Cityplanning documents for infrastructure and an occasional recommendation from RCS staff. The Master Facilities Plan provides for three major types of projects. The first group of projects provides for the maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the City's varied infrastructure, including its streets, storm drains and other public facilities. These projects represent a portion of the needed replacement of the City's General Facilities fixed assets identified below, as more than $1.451 billion in depreciable fixed assets, which are being consumed, conservatively over fifty years, at a rate of nearly $29.0 million annually (after the removal of $245.7 million in non-depreciating parkland). Keep in mind that the hundreds of millions of dollars currently invested in local' streets, storm drainage improvements, utility systems are not represented in this list. The following table indicates the replacement values of the various infrastructure owned by the City. Table MFP-! Replacement Value of Existing City Infrastructure Infrastructure I Replacement Value I Law Enforcement $46,301,202 Fire Suppression 559,305,645 Circulation Svstem $812,276,000 Librarv Facilitv/Collection 530,724,058 Public Use Facilities 554,620,225 Aquatics Facilities $19,015,237 Parklandllmprovements $428,855,011 I Sub-total All Assetsl $1,451,097,378 I I Less Non-depreciating Park Landi ($245,668,817) I I Total Depreciable Assetsl S 1,205.428,561 I The second type of projects are needed to serve future development and include such projects as widening of streets, creation of additional parkland or construction of a new fire station. These projects are proposed to be funded through the development impact fees recommended in the Page 1 r III t Guide to the Master Facilities Plan "" I. companion to this document called Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of San Bernardino. The last type of projects is proposed to enhance the quality of life for all City residents and spur economic growth in the community. These projects would include the construction of a community center or library expansion. I I I I E E E E i I E I I I I E Goal of the Master Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is not intended to be the final word on capital improvement projects needed for the City, but rather a starting point for discussions between City management staff, decision-makers (i.e., the City Council) and the public prior to the formulation of a two or three Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The Master Facilities Plan begins the process of identifying all needed projects for the City through build-out. This document, as all capital improvement programs should be, is rooted in the philosophy that for the document to have any meaningful value to future residents and staff members, it must be constantly updated and revised as new legislation is adopted and as the environment and the City itself changes over the years. In short, the Master Facilities Plan is intended as a fluid, not static, document. Thus, it is essential that periodic updates be performed to add new projects or delete completed or no longer needed projects. The Master Facilities Plan represents the starting point for fulfillment of the following purposes: Planning - The Plan implements the standards and goals contained in the City's General Plan when applicable and proposes improvement projects which are constructed and located in conformance with the General Plan. Financial Planning - A Facilities Plan or CIP should consider the scheduling and availability of financing sources in order to achieve an orderly and comprehensive process. Individual project descriptions in this document detail the project's relationship to other recommended improvements and other scheduling constraints. This effort should always be a high priority of the City in order to insure that efforts between departments are coordinated and to avoid construction made more costly by duplication of construction efforts (i.e. a water pipe installed one year after a road is constructed). A sound capital planning process can also help to rationally plan projects for the purposes oflong-term financing. Taxpayers can accrue savings when capital financing is coordinated such that long-term financing can be sized and timed to achieve the lowest possible financing costs. Budgeting - The following projects should provide the outline for preparation of the Five- Year Capital Improvement Plan in the future. The first year of the CIP then is incorporated into the City's Annual Budget. Note: The current effort does not include the identification Page 2 - , . ... Ii. I I' I I E E I I I I I I I I I I E Guide to tbe Master Facilities Plao of what year the projects will be needed, therefore the project costs default to the last column. However, the project costs are defined in terms of 2006-07 dollar values. Master Facilities Planninl! Process. The Master Facilities Plan represents an interdepartmental effort to identify needed projects through the theoretical point of build-out of the City. Management staff were then asked to allocate projects as a first step towards prioritizing all projects for the Plan. Criteria considered by the management team in evaluating projects included: . Does the project generate operating savings or otherwise enhance the ability of the department to deliver services? . Does the project reduce or eliminate safety or health hazards? . Is the project needed to provide adequate levels of service to future residents or prevent deterioration of service to existing residents? . Was the project recommended in any of the City's engineering or planning master plans, the Corporate Plan or any other adopted City document? . Does the project have a significant positive effect on the community? Funding Analvsis. The following summary section of this Plan includes a projection of historical, as well as potential, revenue sources for the financing of the listed capital improvement projects. Development impact fee revenues were estimated based on the proposed rates recommended in the Development Impact Fee Report. Also, it was assumed for the purposes of this Report and the Development Impact fee Report that development will occur evenly over the period of build-out for the City. In actuality, new development is expected to maintain the current rate over the next ten years and then decrease during the second ten-year period. Other revenue sources were projected based on discussions with City staff, but are shown only for informational purposes. Given the magnitude of costs shown in this Report, RCS recommends that a more detailed financial strategy for construction ofthese improvements (i.e., a Capital Financing Plan) be conducted by the City within the immediate future. Such a document would seek to further identify and quantify potential financing sources for the City of San Bernardino. Also, it should be noted that the Master Facilities Plan emphasizes the total capital needs of the City, in contrast to the more traditional Capital Improvement Program approach which places more of an emphasis on reducing total needs to only reasonably assured revenue sources. The process offurther scheduling projects on a year-to-year basis should continue onward during the Capital Improvement Program process. Page 3 ... III r .. Guide to tbe Master Facilities Plan E I E I I I E E E I i I I I I I t Organization of the Master Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is divided into six major sections, according to the category of capital improvement and each will ultimately be quantified as a separate development impact fee in the companion document. The ten types of improvements are: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vebicles and Equipment - These are projects needed for the City's Police Department, including expansion of the Police Station and acquisition of additional equipment and vehicles. Fire Suppression Facilities, Vebicles and Equipment - This program includes facilities necessary to support the level of service recommended by the City's Fire Department. This section contains an explanation of the need for one additional station and the relocation of four existing fire station, vehicles and assigned equipment for needed fire-fighters. Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System - These projects include future street widening's and additional intersection/signal improvements and regional circulation improvements. Projects are separated into two categories of circulation improvements, local and regional. Community Library Facilities and Collection - This section explains the proportional expansion of the existing library square feet and number of items in the collection per resident. Public Use (Community Centers) Facilities - These projects include the construction of additional community centers for classes, meetings and general public use. Aquatic Facilities - These projects include the construction of additional public pools and the requisite support buildings. Parks/Open Space and Recreation Facilities - The acquisition and development of new parks. construction of recreational facilities for the City and improvement of existing undeveloped parklands are accomplished through this program. There is a summary list of the proposed projects and project costs found at the beginning of each of these sections. Next. you will find an individual project description for each project submitted detailing the proposed scope of the project, the submitting department, justification and the supporting reference document. The Table on the following page indicates the total project expenditures ($462.281,062) identified as necessary through build-out. Page 4 ... ill ,. .. ilt Guide to the Master Facilities Plan ,- .. I ~ E I E i I I . I I I I I I S Table MFP-2 Cost of Required Expansions to City Infrastructure Infrastructure Type Proj eet Totals Law Enforcement Facilities $32,594,934 Fire Suppression Facilities $47,244,872 Local Circulation System $104,469,000 Regional Circulation SYStem $70,439,250 Librarv Facilitv/Collection $15,587,124 Public Use Facilities $18,340,025 Aquatics Facilities $5,232,932 ParklamilImprovements $163,693,175 Total $457,601,312 Fairness and reason (as well as the more important State statutes and Federal court decisions) dictate that not all of the projects will qualify for impact fee funding (i.e. some projects are replacements or service level increasing, etc.). There are no existing impact fee fund balances and thus they will not finance any of the total project needs. Any remaining amount of the total project costs would have to be financed by other sources such as fees, existing taxes or voter approved additional taxes, inter-governmental transfers and the occasional grant. Relationship to Development Impact Fee Report. The Master Facilities Plan was prepared in conjunction with the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) Report, also prepared by ReS. Projects listed in the DIF Report correspond to projects found in this document and contain the same numbering sequence as the Master Facilities Plan. The DIF Report is also divided into fourteen major chapters according to the same order of projects described on the previous page. Thus, a reader who wants more information on Law Enforcement project #1 (police station expansion) found on Schedule 3.1 of the DIF Report should turn to Project No. LE-OI of the Master Facilities Plan. For readers of the Master Facilities Plan who wish to understand the determination of impact fee funding more fully, refer to the Development Impact Fee Report. Page 5 ... ill - &. Guide to tbe Master Facilities Plan E I I I I I I Endnotes 1. Local" infrastructure is dermed as infrastructure within neighborhoods or within the footprint of the development as opposed to spine infrastructure.. As an example. 6" sewer conection lines are generally limited to neighborhoods while 12" lines (spine) collect wastewater from neighborhood to transmit it to the treatment plant. E E I I E I I E E E Page 6 ... l1li m I E I I I I I t E i I I I I I E I I City of SM1 BermrdiIJo Mastl>r FacihtJes Pie Sll1DJ11Ilty - All Projects LE-OI LE-02 LE -()J LE-D4 LE-05 FD-OI FD-02 FD-03 FD-04 FD-05 FD-(J6 FD-07 FD-08 FD-09 FD-IO FD-II FD-12 FD-13 FD-14 FD-15 FD-16 iFD-/7 IST-OI IST-02 IST-03 1ST -04 'ST -05 ST-06 ST -07 ST -08 ST -09 ST-IO ,ST-II , 'ST-12 i ST-I3 i ST 14 . ,ST-15 iST-16 :ST-17 ST-18 ST-19 , Exped Law EDforcemeDt Facilities S~c:e Acquire AdditiOlJlll htrol/Detective/Speci.Jty Vehicles Acquire Officer Assiped EquipmeDt Acquire AtIntJc:ed ComputerlIhtIJ SbMiDg Systems Police StlJtiOD Debt &rvice New Fire StlJtiOD #233 New Fire StlJtiOD #233 RespoDSe Fleet ReJOCIItI> Fire StlJtiOD '-121 ExptlDd Fire StlJtiOD '-124 ReIOClltl> Fire StJltiOD '-126 ReIOClltl> Fire StJltiOD m9 ReIOClltl> Fire StlJtiOD #230 ReIJOvatl> StlJtioo '-121 as Admioistrative/MaiDWl1UJc:e Facility CODStruct a Vebicle Storage BuildiDg CODStruct TraiDiog Facility Acquire Two COllUDMJd Vehicles Acquire Four Squad Vehicles Acquire 'Tbree &daDS aod a Utility Truck Acquire a Reserve EogiDe Acquire AdditiOD.J Assigoed Fire-fighter EquipmeDt Headquarters StlJtioo '-121 Debt Service VerdemODt StJltiOD #232 Debt &rvice 40th Street, Acre Laoe to Electric A veoue 5th Street, SterliDg to Victoria 5th Street, Warm Creek to Pedley Alabama Street, 3rd to City Limits Campus hrkway (Pepper-LiDdeo), Keoda11 to [-215 CeotraJ (Palm Meadows), TippecllDCJe to MouolJliD View CouIstOD, Tippecaooe to MO/JD1JIiD View CODDector, 3rd Street to 5th Street Del Rosa, 6th Street to 9th Street Electric, MO/JD1JIiD View to Nortbpark "G" Street, Mill to Ri.Jto A veoue "H" Street, KeodaIl to 40th Kr:oda11, CuJbridge to PiDe Letu Roell, Mill to Onmge Sbow Little League Drive, hIm to 1-215 Little League Drive, 1-215 frootage to Be/moot Little MO/JDtaiD, Devil Creek CbMJoel to 48th Mill, Pepper to Meridie MO/JDt Vemoo Bridge ". .... ~~<" Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. I ~ !ill! Build-out . . $15,665,521 $4,031,420 $643,608 $2,500,000 $9,754,385 $5,363,371 $650,000 $7,157,347 $1,518,943 $5,363,371 $5,363,371 $5,363,371 $3,309,869 $1,089,101 $4,690,822 $90,000 $480,000 S94,500 $1,275,000 $58,740 $1,794,425 $3,582,641 $2,/70,000 $3,200,000 $480,000 $1,600,000 $4,800,000 $3,200,000 $3,520,000 $3,200,000 $1,600,000 $3,200,000 $1,600,000 S640,OOO $3,500,000 $6,400,000 $2,400,000 ! $1,600,000 ~ .. E C I E I E I I I I I E I E I i E I I..~i .~ . ICity of Su BemMdiIJo Muter Facilities Plu SU111DJMY - All Projects . ST-20 MOUDWlJ View, TbompsoD to Electric ST-21 MOUDWlJ View IJrjdgc at Mission Creek ST-22 MOUDWlJ View, Rivcrview to CAtJtnd ST-23 MmmWlJ View, ]-10toSuBemMdiIJoAve. ST-24 MOUDWlJ View Avenue lUilrrNId Ont/e CrossiDg ST -25 hIm, c.jotJ to ]-215 SB lUmp ST-26 PiDc, KCDtWl to Belmont ST-27 Perris HiD Park Ro.d, 21st to Pacific ST -28 Rmcbo, Coltoo City Limits to 5th ST -29 Ritito, Sierrtl to WatcTJIWI ST-30 Ri.!to, Leu to Tippccmoc ST - 31 Sr.tc Street, 16th to FootbiD ST-32 Sr.tc Street. FootbiD to ]-215 ST -33 Tippccmoc, Mill to Jhrrimu ST -34 University Parlcw1Jy, HIIllI1JJJTk to BNSF Ont/e Sc]JlUlltiOI1 ST - 35 Watc11lWl, 5th to &seliDc . ST -36 Victoria, Ricbudsoo to MOUDWlJ View ST-37 Tnffic SigMl @LittleLagueDrivemd]-215Froor.gc ST - 38 Tnffic SigMl @ Little Lague Drive II11d Belmont ST-39 Tnffic SigMl@Pidmmdc.jOI1 ST-40 Tnffic SigMl@hImmdllldustri.! ST -41 Tnffic SigMl @ hIm II11d ]-215 nmps ST -42 Tnffic Sign.J @ Palm II11d IrviDgtoo ST-43 Tnffic SigMl@hImmdBelmont ST -44 Tnffic Sign.J @ c.mpus Parlcw1Jy (pepper-LiDdeo) II11d llldustri.! ST -45 Tnffic Sign.J @ c.mpus Parkway (Pepper-LiDdCD) II11d ]-215 lUmps ST-46 Tnffic SigMl@ CIuopus Parkway II11d NortbJNUk ST -47 Tnffic Sign.J @ Sierrtl (CSUSB) II11d NortbJNUk ST-48 Tnffic SigMl @ KentWlll11d 48th ST -49 Tnffic Sign.J @ Little MOUDWlJ II11d 30th ST-50 Traffic SigMl @Little MOUDr.iD II11d 48th ST-51 Tnffic Sip/ @ Little MOUDr.iD II11d Nortbpark ST-52 Tnffic SigDJIl @Sr.tcand]-2/O ST-53 Tnffic Sign.! @Merdill11l111d Ri.!to ST -54 Tnffic SigMl @ Macy II11d Mill i ST -55 Tnffic SigMl @ RII11cbo (Sr.tc) and Foothill , ST -56 ! Traffic Sign.J @ Minmontc II11d 27th i ST-57 ITnffic SigMl@MmmWlJlI11dKCDtWl 1ST-58 I Tnffic SigMl@MOUDWlJlI11d48th 1ST-59 ITraffic Signal@MoUDr.iDandNortbpark ST-60 Traffic Sign.! @ "}" Street and 1llIII11d CCDtcr Drive I ..' . ..... ......~.< : i , I S640,ooo $1,152,000 $6,912,000 $1,200,000 $240,000 $760,000 $800,000 $1,210,000 $2,240,000 $1,600,000 $2,400,000 $7,400,000 $8,000,000 $5,600,000 $1,200,000 $5,760,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $120,000 $330,000 $150,000 $200,000 $200,000 $350,000 $200,000 $200,000 $175,000 $200,000 $175,000 $175,000 $350,000 $200,000 $200,000 $250,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $175,000 $200,000 I 8 Revenue & Cost SpeCialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 '"' . I City of SaD &nurdiIw Muter Facilities PllUJ S/llDIIJJUY - All Projects .' ......--.....,---..............--............ C I I E I I I I I I I I' " J I I I E I ST-61 ST -62 ST -63 ST -64 ST -65 ST-66 ST-67 ST-68 ST -69 ST-70 ST-71 ST-72 ST-73 ST-74 ST-75 ST-76 ST-77 ST-78 ST-79 ST-80 ST -81 ST-82 ST-83 ST-84 ST-85 ST -86 ST -87 ST -88 ST-89 ST 90 I~=:~ , ! ST-94 ST -95 ! ST-96 ST 97 ST-98 ,ST-99 1ST 100 ILB-OI , ,.-- ,.. .....,... '-",."-----"'- ','-"---'--- ................."...-,..... Traffic Sip (jJ "H" Sl1eet IUJd MarsbaJJ Traffic Sip (jJ Auto Plaza IUJd Fairway Traffic Sip (jJ "E" Street IUJd CeDtury Traffic Sip (jJ "E" Street IUJd Orange Sbow LaDe Traffic Sip (jJ Arrowhead IUJd Orange Show LaDe Traffic Sip @ArrowheadlUJdCeDtral Traffic Sip (jJ MOUDtaiD View IUJd 13th Traffic Sip (jJ MOUDtaiD View IUJd MarsbaJJ Traffic Signal @ Electric IUJd 48th Traffic Signal @ Dolittle IUJd Mill Traffic Sip @LeIJa IUJd OTlUJge Sbow Road Traffic Sip (jJ LeIJa IUJd CeDtral Traffic Sip (jJ LeIla IUJd RiaIto Traffic Signal (jJ LeIJa IUJd 3rd Traffic Signal @ East eamegie IUJd Hospital LaDe Traffic Sip @ TiJ'P'!'C1IDOC IUJd RiaIto Traffic Sip @ Del Rosa IUJd MarsbaIl Traffic SigDal @ Del Rosa IUJd 6th Traffic Signal @ SterliDg IUJd MarsbaIl Traffic Signal (jJ SterliDg IUJd Lynwood Traffic Sip (jJ Sterling IUJd 6th Traffic Sip @ S. MountaiD View IUJd Central (Palm Meadows) Traffic Sip @ S. MOUDtaiD View IUJd 1-10 WestbOUDd Ramp Traffic Sip (jJ Guthrie IUJd Pacific IntercbangelRamps (jJ [-215IUJd Palm Avenue (SB, County) Interchange/Ramps @ [-2151UJd Pepper Linden (Campus Parkway) (SB) InterchangelRamps @ [-2151UJd University Parkway (SB, County) Interchange/Ramps @ 1-2/0 IUJd Waterman (SB, HigbIlUJd, County) IntercblU1gelRamps @ 1-2/0 IUJd Del Rosa (SB, HigbIlU1d, County) IntercblU1ge/Ramps (jJ 1-210 IUJd Victoria (SB, HigbIlU1d, County) InterchangelRamps @ [-210 IUJd 5th (SB, Higbland, RedllU1ds) InterchangelRamps (jJ I 10 IUJd Tippecanoe IntercbangelRamps @ 1-10 IUJd Pepper (SB, County, Colton) InterchangelRamps (jJ 1-/0 IUJd MountJJin View (SB, Loma Linda, Redlands, County) TippecllDOC Bridge over the SaDtJJ Ana River Grade Separation @ Palm A venue (SB) ,Grade Separation @ Rialto (SB) , Grade Separation (jJ State Street/University (SB) : Grade Separation (jJ Hunts LlUJe (SB, Colton) Grade Separation (jJ RIU1cbo A venue General Library Square Foot Expansion " ... ,.',,'" ,',.,',.::'i" ,.,', "'evenue & Cost Specialists, L,L,C. I~! ~I " ',,' " $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $150,000 $175,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $150,000 $200,000 $200,000 $150,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,930,000 $20,000,000 $1,560,000 $7,280,000 $5,790,000 $10,000,000 $320,000 $7,000,000 $370,000 $3,040,000 $2,936,250 $2,349,000 $2,232,000 $2,140,000 $1,143,000 $2,349,000 I $5,152,818 ') Fullerton, CA 92831 ". ill I I I I I I I I ; I I Ii I I I I I I I City of SaD BemardiDo Muter FacilIties P/s SlJ1IJImry - All Projects LB-lJ2 LB-D3 CC-D/ CC-02 CC-D3 CC-04 AQ-D/ AQ-02 PK-D/ PK-02 PK-03 PK-04 PK-05 Fv-';OIJ of Libnry CoHectiOlJ MaiD Libnry Debt Service Verdemont CoIDIDlllJity CeDter DelIIWUJ Heights GymDII6iUIll Nicbo/SOlJ COIDIDlllJity CeDter COIJStruct AdditimW Public Use Splice CoDstruct Water Poo//AttnlctiOD CoDstruct Locker/ AdmiDistratiOD Building CoDstruct Six 5.0 AClll Neighborlwod Pules CODStruct SeVCll /0.0 AClll Pll6sive CoIDIDlllJity Pules CODStruCt Four 25.0 AClll Active (sports) COIDIDunity Pules MiscelllUlCOUS Puk /mprovemeDts Open Splice AcquisitiOD (/59.4 acms) Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. TotII/ Through Bui/d-out 15,083,04/ 15,35/,265 $4,125,000 $1,925,000 $1.925,000 $10,365.025 $3,224.863 $2,008,069 $23,296,374 $54,358,213 $77.654.600 $1.000.000 $4.015.0/8 10 Fullerton, CA 92831 E D I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment 11 i:i ~ ~ ~ :l 11 ,., - ~ ~ ! ~ ~ - .:, ti ~ ::i ~ - 'a .. ~ f.;;CQ a a a a a Q - , ~ a a a a a a 8: , "" ~ a a a a a ~ r!... ~ a a a a a "- Q , ~ l'" 11Io c m I' I I .. "8 - '~i ~ ~=a~ CQ I I I I I I I I I ) .~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ .~ '" . g " '" i3..!!<l: i ~ - e :J Ii .ll :'a E - =-- u Q i3 ~ ri1<l:"'l ...... ... rS Q " ..... ~ 1il it: ed J I I I I - ;:; ~ ~ ~ :l .~ .. ,., ~ is i ~ ~ ~ .; ~ '" ~ .. ;; .. l:l ." i ~ .0 ~ . " I ~ ~ it f ! ... I " ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ tlf ~ Q IIi!] ~ 'i ~ l ~ ill .2 il ~ " . ~ E; ~! .:l "" c:; "" ~ '8 l~~ " a. " ~ ~ ~ LiI 'II: '< 'Il: It; 9 ~'9'!, c;J ~,~' ~i~' ~ 1 -;... ""'I ...tI ..., I J - '" co N '" <( () c: B ~ ~ :; u. ~ ~ . ~ ell 51 2 ~ . S 51 'S oS! -Il .J!! b .~ 0. '" 0 =i il e 0 . '< t .~ ~ () . -i :s -i 15 ui ~ - .!!1 5 n; ~ '0 Q Q) b c- o en '5 . 7ii .~ 0 .. () . ~ 'C c: 1; ., " ~ Q) ::l ;n: c: Q . 12 Q) i ~- > I Q) a: ... .. "'" ~ City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail II; .. .. . .. . .. Pro.io<t Titl.: ProgrtU1J: Expand Law Enforcc:mOllt Facilities Spac. Law Enforcement Facilitics. Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Dq>artlDonr(s}: Prqio<f No.: ... Police Department LE-ol P~;cct Description: > Acquire land for. and expand facUities to house the City's additional law enforcement services. The added space would need to be approximately 32,308 square feet to be able to maintain the current levels of service afforded to the existing community by the current 80,000 square foot facility. The additional space would house the additional administration. patrol. investigation, records, traffic control. analytical and support staff. short-term evidence storage. report writing spacc, training. meeting and locker/shower facilities and other space needs required to maintain current building standards. Included in the cost estimate is the acquisition of about five and half acres for the building and additional visitor/employee parking. i .. Justification/Requirement for Project: i\ I The ultimate-use law enforcement building will be required to house the build-out staff as the full impact of development of all currently > undeveloped acreage in the City occurs. The current 80,000 square feet of the facilities dedicated to law enforcement affords approximately >\> I 256.4 square feet of building space for each of the existing 312 officers (and dermes the current building standard of space/officer) and the new .... facility will extend that standard into the future by acquiring about 32.308 square feet for the additional 126 officers need to maintain the ... existing levels of service. No decision has been made regarding the location or configuration of the additional space but the Department intends .... > on constructing two decentralized stations, one on the north and one in the south areas of the City. 1\ I ... Consequences of Not Completing Project: i.. I The capital items contained in these Master Facility Plans is not meant to imply that either the additional space or officers to be added as a ........ result of development is neither adequate or sufficient. It is only implied that these MfP projects contained within the Law Enforcement ......... Chapter would allow the City to maintain the level of service (LOS) at General Plan Build-out with 438 officers (in 112,308 SF) as is currently afforded with the 312 officers (in 80,000 SF). Reference Document: Project Timing: Iii None, the proposed space needs arc limited to impact-based needs and The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay are defmed by the "proportionality" requirement of the impact fee acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this i calculation. engagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. , ....i .. , I ~ . 201D-lJ Total i PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2oo8-1J9 2009-10 through aJJ i EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I , ... ; I Dosignllnspoction/ AdJDinistration SO SO SO SO S1.248,489 S1.248,489 Ii) i Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO S1.257.795 S1.257,795 i I Construction SO SO SO SO S11.370.262 SI1.370,262 I Contingency SO SO SO SO S674 ,349 S674,349 , , Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO $\,114,626 SI.I\4,626 I i TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO $\5.665,52\ SI5,665,521 . ....... Potential Funding Sources: 13 ... General Fund revenues, Law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a specifically-defined tax measure. I (oj . .. . S-OY. - . 1- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. III ............. .............. ... . ..... .... . ..... . .i I .. i? ........ City of San Bernardino i'. , Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I .. ... ~ie<t Title: Program: ....... Acquire Additional Patrol/Detective/Specialty Vehicles Law Enforcement Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment Suhmming Departm<Jlt(s): Project No.: Police Department LE-02 I. .... .. P~;cct Description: > Acquire 9S miscellaneous additional response vehicles required by law enforcement including a combination ofpatroJ, unmarked and specialty vehicles at an average of $42.436 per equipped vehicle. These 9S additional vehicles arc nceessary to maintain the current 0.75 vehicles per officer ratio with the addition of 126 officers. The current standard of 0.75 ychicJcs per offiCer is based upon the 234 vehicles divided by the existing 312 officers. .. ........... Justification/Requirement for Project: . As the residential and business community continues to grow, the Police Department will receive a statistically determined increase in the number of law enforcement calls for service. The expansion of the paliee station is discussed in LE-ol. As the law enforcement force \i expands, additional vehicles arc needed to equip the additional officers consistent with the pro-rata expansion of the sworn staff and building < size. i i Iii COJJseqUClJCCS of Not Completing ProJect: Inability to maintain the current ratios of vehicles per officer will severely reduce the City's ability to maintain current beat strength and a i reduced level of services would result. i Reference Document: Project Timing: i ......... None. the proposed vehicle needs arc limited to impact-based needs The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay and arc defmed by the "proportionality" requirement of the impact fee acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this calculation. engagement. thus all project cost default to"the "Build-out" column. ... , 2010- Jl TotJll ,i\ PROPOSED 2006-G7 2007-G8 2008-09 2009-10 through JIl/ , EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO $0 $0 SO $0 lAnd Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO 'ii Construction SO SO $0 SO $0 $0 SO $0 ..' Contingency $0 SO SO $0 ..... Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO 54.031.420 54.031.420 ..... TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO 54.031.420 54.031.420 Potential Funding Sources: 14 ......... General Fund revenues, Law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a specifica1ly-defmcd tax measure. I (01 .. . -....y~-D)6 t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "" .. .... ... > -tt .... . ....... ..........t..>t>.. City of San Bernardino 1 ,.>>.. ... .. ............. i..' i."..'." Master Facilities Plan Project Detail !ri> .. ...... ...> P~i<<t Tide: Progrom: Acquire Off=r Assigned Equipment Law Enror........t Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment . ... Submi"ing DepamDent(s): Proj<<t No.: Police Department LE-03 .. ...... . I>> Project Description: I. Additional equipment assigned to 126 officers necessary maintain the existing level of service. The list includes, but it not limited to: proteCtive vest. handgun, badges/patches/name tags, flashlight, nylon bc1t1attachemcntJ. uniforms, etc. The cost includes an amount for undertaking the back-ground check. psychological exam, physical/medical exam, and polygraph for the successful candidates. ..... I Ii >> JustifigtionlRcquircmMt for Project: liIl The equipment is necessary for an officer to function in the field. The list is mostly safety and communications equipment but also includes the > significant recruiting costs. > .......... ".......... > Consequences of Not Completing Project: (I Officer safety would be compromised and the ability to function would be impaired. \ ....... Reference Document: Project Timing: > None, the proposed space needs are limited to impact-based needs and The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay ..... I are defmed by the "proportionality" requirement of the impact fee acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this JI calculation. engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-outOl column. , , I 2010-11 ToUII Ii. , PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2oo8-<J9 2009-10 through .n I. I EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I i Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .... , i , Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 , $0 $0 $0 $0 i ! Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I COJJtingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .......... , I i Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $643,608 $643,608 , , TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 . $643,608 $643,608 ... I I , I . \ Potential Funding Sources.. 15 ..... ; , General fund revenues, Law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a specifically-defmed tax measure. I I (0) . ...... ..... ~.~. I ~ r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - . i . ..... ..... .. ......... ....... .. ..i , City of San Bernardino <i. .... ; Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I ..... ........... .. cz ... ... .. ProJect Titl.: ProgT8l1l: . Acquire Advanced Computer/Data Sharing Systems Law Enforcement Facilitics, Vehicles and Equipment . Submitting Dopartmon/(.): Project No.: Police Department LE-<l4 Prq;ect Description: ii! .. Acquire Specialty and Communications Equipment/Improvements and Computer Data Sharing Equipment Acquire hardware and software for advanced fmgerprint. DNA, dispatch. jail management. crime analysis. field report writing and record keeping systems. These new systems arc necessary to allow the Department to maintain services to an ever increasing population and business community. Also included is the . acquisition of additional hand-held communications equipment (pagers/radiol) for the 126 additional officers and communications equipment (radios/MDCs/modems) for the 95 additional vehicles. .. Justification/Requirement for Project: < .............. The amount and sophistication of crime is ever increasing. The City will need to acquire new computer software designed to provide new information sharing tools and greater investigatory capability. The transfer of information gathered from computer systems to officers in the field as well 85 proper and necessary communications with those same officers is an absolute requirement for the safety of the City's citizens and the officers themselves. Again, nothing is implied regarding the sufficiency of the proposed additions. The proposed additions are limited i to capital required to maintain the existing level of service, be it the City's desired Level of Service or not. i > 1< Consequences of Not Completing ProJect: ( Failure to acquire new advances in electronic data processing and communications equipment would force the City to operate without the ........ assistance of other agencies. i I. .. ... Reierence Document: Project Timing: ..... None, the proposed space needs arc limited to impact-based needs and The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay i arc dermed by the "proportionality" requirement of ihe impact fee acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this . calculation. engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. > ii 201D-II ToW > PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through oJI EXPENDITURES Build-out You. Design/lnspection/ AdnWJistration SO SO SO SO SO SO , Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO , I Construction SO SO SO SO SO SO Contingency SO SO SO SO SO SO Ai Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO S2.5OO.OOO S2,5OO,000 ..... TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2.5oo.ooo S2,5oo,000 .. ! Potential Funding Sources: 16 1 General Fund revenues, law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a specifically-dermed tax measure I ! j (c) ... .. .... <> ........>.. ..... .... ... ---.---:- ~ > ..i>. ....... .. . ....... . ''''-:-:::';':_,-~:~.':;nt#w~:?:::(:; "" :i iIIIl ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ... . ..\. . ...> .~........ I I City of San Bernardino I.. Master Facilities Plan Project Detail 1....\.)\...>......................... I .. . ...> > .... . ... :: I> ProjoctTltJe: Prognm: I Police SlaIion Debt Service Law Enforcemeot Facllilies, Vchicl.. aod Equipmeot Submirring Deparrment(s}: Projoct No.: Police Department LE-05 . . ........... P~;ect Description: )> Make remaining payments on the Police Station debt service schedule. ......... >> . Justification/Requirement for Project: ... The debt service payments must be made. \i > > )> ... Ii) I> Consequences of Nor Completing Pr~jt:Cr: ........ Default on the payment schedule is not an option. ...... .> >i \) . ......... I Reference Document: Project Timing: > Police Station Debt Service Schedule. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay .. acquisition described herein. was not included in the seopc of this ... engagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 20JD-U TouJ )i > PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2oo8-G9 2009-JO through .0 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I Design/Inspectionl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,754,385 $9,754,385 LaJ)d Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 COlJ.f;tructioll $0 $0 $0 $0 . $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ....... EquJpmentlOthor $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ?I TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $9.754,385 $9,754,385 ... ... Potenrial Funding Sources: ... III E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Fund revenues, Law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a specifically-defined tax measure. 17 (e) -.y.-.. ~ E t m- E I I I I I t t I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment 18 I"" .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ... ~ ! ~ lii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" -I'.. ;:: l\ <l ;:: ;:: ;:: '" i l:i - ~ ~ ~ ~ .. - II ~ ~ '" 0; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ i 't. ~ 0; 1 Ii ~I ,~~ l :: ~ .. ~ .. '" ::l '" :l '" ;:; :l :l :l ::l ::; ;( ::; ;:; ::l ~""O;; .. ~ &l hi - ~ ... i ;:: ;:: ;:: .. Q lii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - l:i ... l\ Ii .. ~ Ie - .. ~ ~ .. - "'''ll ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ i ~ ~ 0; 1 ~ ~ "'i ~ I ~ :: "! ~ .. ~ '" ::l - -ii '" Q :li! :l '" ;:; :l ::l :l ::l ;:; ;( ::; ;:; l;lx ~ .. ... '3 i'l~Q:l i a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Ii all Q Ii ... I Ix ~ Ii. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ali 8l I I I ~ I a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ ii ..!. ~ h a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a "- Q I i ~ C. L i I I II I \ 1 I ......."':;1 i ~Li I -I I ~I I ! I I Ii II , t \ I , , I Ei I II ,f:, ::I ~ I I I tZ' 1 , , . i 1 ii ~ !~ I ~ ~ .Ii i ~ ~ ~ i .~ ~ t ~I i , i:l I l> , <l! ... 1 :s ' .il ".; e <l! ~ -II ~ ~.:; ii; ~ ~ . ~ ~ il:,~ '" ~I;o.. ...!:!," I ij i :ll Q ~ ~. i!! "" 11' 8 ~ .. '" 10:1'" - ~ ~ 1 ~ ;1 i ~ ... '~l ~ ~ ' ! '! ~'~ '" '" I . ... ~ ,~ 10: ~ !' ~Ili 'dl. 1 ~ ! i '.C:: ~ ';:j ,~ ,~ a a a a ! ~=, ,! ~I <l! t a il1l:~ a a e e ,~ e :> _ "- I ""'. .' \l It a I :; c:: e a .1r:'i'~i~l~ ~ ~ ii: ii: ii; . e .:J c e ii; " _ _ ~I Ii;; I!: .. i I '8 &l " '- .e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tillll I '- ~ ii; ii; i 1 . . . ~ J ~i :-::: ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ! I ~ u e ~ !l. ~ ~ :ll :ll :ll :ll o 0 '< '< 0( '< '" :l; I \... :;; '- Q .s ~ s ~I""I ~ Q;!: ~.!S ~ E1:: ... I ~ iii) IU ~ ::l :.!; :: ~ "" ~ 10",. , ., 'I, 'I, ~\~i ~i~i 2i~;~! '" ~i~ , , , ~ ~ ~; 1 ~! ~, 2 ~ Ii: "- ~ ~ ~ < o c: oS ~ '5 u. ~ ~ u , li! ~ II ~ ~ . ;s II '5 .l!! {l . 1; .!!, ~ 'iii -5 . ~ . . "< ;j .!!, e Q, . S '0 " . 5 9- . c u . '5 o .~ '" o '~ 1; . _. C' ~I\: ~..; 0 ...i ...i 1Il .~ <ii 'u ell 0- CJ) 1il 0 () all ell :::l c: 19 ell > ell II: t E ; I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Now Firo Station #233 ProgrllllJ: Fire Suppression FaoUitios, Vehicles and EqUiplllOlll Submitting Dopartm<nt(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-Ol Project Description: Acquire land for and construct a 6,700 square foot station capable of housing a response company in the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan Area. The 2 X 2 floor configuration would consist of two 20' wide by 80' deep response vehicles bays (3.200 S.f.) in order to adequately house a standard Type I pumper/engine and a Type III engine. The remaining 3.500 square feet would be used for living quarters. utility/storage and 8 staff conference room for up to four fltcfightcrs. Justification/Rc.quircment for Project: The specific plan area is projected to consist of the construction of 465 detached dwellings. 558 attached dwellings, a 600 room hotel and approximately 1,045.000 square feet of conference/commercial space. Typically. this limited amount of development would not warrant the need for a separate station. However, given the somewhat geographic separation from the rest of the City and its close interface with the contiguous wildland, a station is required. Most likely. the construction of this station and acquisition of the response vehicles would be required as condition of approval in the Development Agreement. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The proposed development could not be approved due to the poor response time from the City's existing stations. Reference Document: F ire Department staff planning. Project TiIDing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay 3cquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagem~nt. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-ii Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Y cars Design/Inspection! AdministrBtion SO SO l SO SO S327,429 S327,429 L8Jld Acquisition!RigJJt of Ws.". SO SO! SO SO ! S1.6OO.830 SI.600.830 :JstructlOn SO SO : $) Sr:' \,008.466 ' S3.oo8,466 COlltmgency $0 : SO : SO SO i S160.823 S16O.823 Equipment/Other SO SO SO I SO \ S265.823 S265.823 TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO i S5,363.371 S5,363,371 Potentia) Fundin/! Sources: :-~rai Fund r":"'Cllues, Fire SuppressIOn De..'elopmcnt Impact Fccs and potcntlally a ,,'uter-approvcd tJ..\ me(lsurc 20 ........,..:zc:lM ,. '- E I I I I I I I I I I Ii I II I I II I I , I I II II I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro.i<<:I Title: New Fire Station 1233 Response Fleet Progrom: Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles end Equipment Submittillg DeportrDcnt(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-()2 ProJect Description: Acquire a Type I engine and Type III engine for assignment to Station #233. Given the (X)ntinuous growth of brush in the contiguous wildland areas and trees on privately owned property. additional wildland interface equipment will be necessary. Justification/Requirement for P~jcct: The station requires response fleet consistent with the needs and risks posed by the area it will serve. Property owners typically plant small trees on their new property as part of the initiallandsc:aping efforts. M these trees mature and grow, they become potential conduits for spreading fire from adjacent wildland areas into developed areas. The Department needs additional resources to have a fast strike capabUity to deflect such fires. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The proposed development could not be approved due to the poor response time from the City's existing stations. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 20lo-U PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Dcsian/lnspectionl AdDrinistration SO SO SO $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 SO $0 $0 Construction SO $0 $0 $0 ! $0 Contingency SO $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment/Other SO SO $0 $0 $650.000 TOTAL COST SO SO $0 $0 $650.000 Toui all Years SO $650,000 $650,000 Potentia) Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved ta~ measure. 21 (c) '-'Y.-.. . SO SO SO ... .. '" L. ; II' .. I E I I I ; I 'I 1\ II , I I I I i City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail p~;ea Tide: R.locate Fir. Station #221 Prognm: Fire Supp....ion FacUilies, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Depurment{s): Fire Department Project No,: FIHl3 Project Description: Acquire land for and construct an 8,700 square foot station capable oChausing two response companies near 9th Street and Waterman Avenue. The 3 X 2 floor configuration would consist of throe 20' wide by go' deep bays (4,800 S.F.) in order to adequately bonae a standard pumper/engine and a second front-line vehicle. The remaining 4.900 square feet would be used for living quarters. utility/storage and a staff conference room. The station is required to relocate the engine companies from the existing Station #2211oeation. Justification/Requirement for Project: It is proposed that the existing Station #221 complex become (only) tI:1e Fire Administrative headquarters/maintenance/storage facility. The existing fire fleet maintenance shops (14.492 S.F) must be demolished to allow for the proposed [-215 widening. The existing bays at Station #221 are suitable to function as the new rrre fleet maintenance operation. To make room for the relocation of the maintenance operation. the Station #221 fire/medic response capabilty will need to be rel~ted to a suitable nearby location. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The maintenance facility will have to relocated regardless and the City would not be able to relocate the Station to a more advantageous location. Lastly, the additional traffic expected from the intensification willlikc1y increase response time from Station #7. Refcrence Document: Firc Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out DcsiglJ/lnspectionl Administration SO SO SO SO $463.181 Land AcquisitionlRighr of Way SO SO SO SO S1.829.520 Construction SO SO $0 $0 $4.246.965 Contingency SO SO $0 ' $0 I $232.833 Equipment/Other SO SO SO $0 $384.848 TOTAL COST $0 SO SO $0 $7.157.347 Total all y..,. $463,181 $1,829,520 $4,246,965 S232,833 $384,848 $1.151,341 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues. Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax. measure. 22 (0) Iaaoio1)o..' .. .. t ; I . I I I I I I I I i I \ I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Proic<l Title: Expand Fire StaliOll #224 Program: Fire Suppr""iOll FacUiIiei, Vehicl.. and Equipment Su~m;rrjng Deputmenl(I): Fire Depanment Project No.: F041 Project Description: Acquire 0.30 acres for ~d expand the station by about 3,000 square feet for an additional puamedic squad. JUstifiClltiOn/Rcquiret1JMt for Project: Additional development will generate the demand for an additional paramedic squad. Consequences of Not Comp1ctiJJg Project: All medic responses would need to respond from existing facilities. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Tlmlng: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all projcet cost default to the "Build-out" column. 20J()-J 1 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2OO8-(J9 2009-10 through EXPENDfTURES BuiJd-out Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S120,091 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO S135.736 Consrruction SO SO SO SO S1.098.074 Contingency SO SO SO SO S62.212 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO S102,830 TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO SI.518,943 Potentia! Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. (oj Total all y..... S120,091 SI35,736 SI,098,014 S62,212 SI02.830 SI.518,943 ., 'Y.- 23 ... " .. L ; I I I I I I E I I I E I i : I \ I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~;cct Tid.: Relocate Fire Station 11226 Program: Fir. Suppression F""Uiti.., Vehicl.. and Equipment Submitting Deputmcnt(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-05 Project Description: Acquire land for and construct a 6,700 square foot station capable of housing a relocated lingle raponsc company (roughly three four fire-fighters). The 2 X 2 floor configuration would consist of two bay. 20' wide by 80'deep bay. (3,200 S.F.) in order to adequately house a standard pumper/engine and a back-up. The remaining 3.500 square feet would be used for living quarters. utility/storage and conference room. The facility would be in the vicinity of Del Rosa Avenue and Date Avenue. Justification/Requiremcnt for P~joct: The addition of approximately 21,000 residential dwelling units and 80.5 million square feet of busin... space will r..u1t in an approximateloy 39 % increasc in calls at General Plan build-out. Typically I such an increase would statistically result in requiring four new stations. However. staff and a City-wide Committee have determined that the anticipated new development could be accommodated with one new station and the relocation of four others. This is significant in that it allows for the accommodation of nearly 4011 more calls-far-service with a minor increue (about 8%) in on-going staff costs. An additional factor is the continual incease in traffic from probable residential intensification. response times from the existing responding stations, willlikcly increase due to the additional traffic load. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Additional stations would have to constructed, a counter productive step to maDirni7;rtg staff costs. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of thil engagement, thus all projm cost default to the NBuild-out" column. 20iD-II PROPOSED 2()()6-o7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-iO through EXPENDITURES BujJd-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 SO $0 SO S327,429 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO SO SO S1.600.83O Construction $0 $0 SO $0 S3.008,466 Contingency SO $0 $0 SO SI60.823 Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO SO S265,823 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO S5.363,371 Potential Funding Sourc~s: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. (c) Total all Years. S327,429 S265,823 S5,363,371 24 ... , I. E . I I I I I I I I I I I I Ii I I' I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and EquipmClll Project Titl.: RelocaIO Fire Station 1/229 Submming Deptu1ment(s): Fire Department Project No.: FO-o6 Prqi<<t Description: Acquire land for and eonstruct a 6,700 square foot station capable of housing a relocated single raponK company (roughly three four ru....fight.rs). The 2 X 2 fioor configuration would consist of two bays 20' wide by 80'deep bay. (3,200 S.F.) in order to adequately hou... standard pumper/engine and a back-up. The remaining 3,500 square feet would be used for living quarters. utility/storage and conference room. The facility would be in the vicinity of Rialto Avenue and Rancho Drive. JustificationIRt:quirt:mcnt for Project: The addition of approximately 21,000 residential dwelling units and BO.S million square feet of business space will result in an approximatcley 3911 increase in calls at General Plan build-out. Typically. such an increase would statistically result in requiring four new statiODl. However. staff and 8 City-wide Committee have determined that the anticipated. new development could be accommodated with one new station and the relocation of four others. This is significant in that it allows for the accommodation of nearly 40" more calls-far-service with a minor increase (about 8%) in on-going staff costs. An additional factor is the continual incease in traffic from probable residential intensification, response times from the existing responding stations, willlikcly increase due to the additional traffic load. Consequences of Not Completing P~;cct: Additional stations would have to constructed, a counter productive step to maiximizing staff costs. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 2OOS-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S327.429 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO $1,600.830 Construction SO SO SO SO S3.oo8,466 Contingency SO SO SO SO SI60,823 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO S265,823 TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 S5.363,371 Total all Y cars S327,429 SI.6OO,830 S3.oo8,466 $160,823 $265,823 $5,363.371 PotentW Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. 25 (e) .-_:_:-:.)+,~/nt)\:::{::. "" a. I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I Project Title: Relocate Fire Station 1230 Prognm: Fire Suppression Focilitieo. VelticlCl and EquipmClll f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I Submitting Deportment!s): Fire Department Project No.: FrHl7 Project Description: Acquire land for and construet a 6,700 square fool station capable of housing a relocated lingle reaponse company (roughly three four fire-fighters). The 2 X 2 floor configuration would consist of two bays 20' wide by BO'deep bays (3.200 S.F.) in order to adequately house a standard pumper/engine and a back-up. The remaining 3.500 square feet would be: used for living quarters, utility/storage and conference room. The facility would be in the vicinity of Waterman Avenue and Mill Street. Justilicstion/Rcqwremcnt for Project: Tho addition of approximately 21,000 residential dwelling units and SO.5 million square feet of businCIs space will rClult in an approximateley 3911 increase in calls at General Plan build-out. Typically, such an increase would statistit".JIl1y result in requiring four new stations. However. staff and a City-wide Committee have determined that the anticipated new development could be accommodated with one neW station and the relocation of four others. This is significant in that it allows for the accommodation of nearly 40~ more calls-far-service with a minor increase (about 8%) in on-going staff costs. An additional faetor is the c:ontinual inccaJe in traffIC from probable residential intensification. raponsc times from the existing responding stations, willlikcly increase due to the additional traffic load. Consequences of Not Completing Prq,iect: Additional stations would have to constructed, a counter productive step to mai7imi71'lg staff costs. Lastly, the additional traffic expected from the intensification will likely increase response time from Station #7. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Proj<<t Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "BuUd-out" column. lOID-II PROPOSED 2006-()7 2007-()8 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out IJesjgn/lnspectjon/ Administration $0 SO SO SO S327,429 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 $0 SO SI,6OO,830 Construction SO $0 SO SO S3,008,466 Contingency SO $0 $0 SO SI60,823 Equipment/Other SO $0 $0 SO S265,823 TOTAL COST SO $0 $0 SO S5,363,371 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. Total all Years S327 ,429 S1.6OO,830 S3,008,466 SI60.823 S265 ,823 S5,363.371 26 - l. Ii <,i..', <, ,', ,< .' i.i """.. ,<i ,,,,,.. .i<. i City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail i I i .,.. . --c ,,'" --c ..'...".... ....... ProJect Title: Pro"..".: Renovate Station 1/221 as Administrative/Maintenance Facility Fire Suppression Fatuities, Vehicles and Equipmcm li/ Submitting Deparrmcnt(s): Proj<<;t No.: Fire Department FD-oB . I Prqiccr Description: i Conven the existing station #221 to function as the department's headquarters. maintenanc:e and supply facility. The station current supports the administration function and would continue to do so. The project consists of converting the vacated fire operations space into the fire fleet maintenance, storage and supply center. The facility would probably need approximately 3.200 additional square feet (see FO-QS). Iii I .'.,.. . Justification/Requirement for Project: 1\ . The Department would have to fmd other resources for this function becuasc the current maintenance facilities will be acquired by the State for Ii the 1-215 widening. 1< Ii... it Consequences of Not Completing Pr~;cct: i The Department would be limited to current limited public awareness equipment. i ........ t Reference Document: Project Timing: ;;i , Fire Department staff planning. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay Ii acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this I engagement. thus all projcct cost default to the "Build-out" column. I.>i I 2010- jJ TersJ . PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through sJl I I I EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I Design/Inspection/Administration SO $0 $0 $0 $286.628 $286.628 iU .'/ ..... Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO I Construction SO $0 SO SO $2,606,848 S2.606.848 . Contingency SO SO SO $0 S156.958 $156,958 ...... Equipment/Other SO SO SO $0 : S259,435 S259 ,435 i TOTAL COST SO SO $0 $0 $3,309,869 $3,309,869 ..... I Potentia) Funding Sources: There wlll also bc2r1cipl' General Fund revenues. Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure Irom the requtred purchase of the ex.isting maintenance facility by CALTRANS. I I . I (c) .. .. .... ...... . -.y. 2llO6 ......5,.. I; i . I I E i I I I I I. I E i I.., '. E '"" III I i I I I I I I I II 1\ , ; II I I' I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~;.ct Title: Construct a Vehicle Storage Building Progrom: Fire Suppression F""iliti... Vehicles and Equipment Submirting Dcpartment(s): Fire Department Project No,: FD-09 Project Description: Construct an 3.200 square foot vehicle storage building to store the Department', VariOUI reserve vehicles, minor fleet repair, warehouse operations and medical/station supplies. The facility is planned to be located at the proposed combined Headquarters Facility (ex-Station #221). JusrificationlRequiremMt for Project: The relocation of the maintenance operations from the current "H" Street location will require some additonal space for parts storage and vehicle maintenance. The existing bays would function as the major repair areas and would probably house the lifts/hoists. Additionally. the City has a number of reserve vehicles or vehicles not assigned to any specific station and they need to be stored in 8 covered facUity to increase the vehicle longevity. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The maintenance function would not have enough space. Reserve vehicles would need to be stored or at existing stations. Refere/lce Document: F ire Department staff planning. ProJect Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 20lD-lJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 tJJrough EXPENDITURES Build-out , DesiglJI/llSpectiolJI Administration SO SO SO SO S94.354 i LtJJJd Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 SO $0 ' $0 ConstructiolJ $0 SO $0 $0 5858.900 , Cmrillj?ency SO i SO SO $0 ! S51.207 . Equipment/Other SO SO I SO $0 : S84.640 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO S1.089.101 Potential Funding Sources: G~n~ral Fund revenues. fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potenttally a voter-approved tax. measure (0) Toro! all Years SO S858 ,900 S51. 207 S84.64O S1.089.101 28 ~. 2006 S94,354 ...... ...... .......>>... .. '.' . .. .................. > <>>.>. . ..... .>.... .. ..... i I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail . . .. Project Tid.: ProgrtUD: Construct Training Facility Fire Suppression Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Dcportmcnt(s): Project No.: Fire Department FD-IO Prqicct Description: .............. Acquire about three acres for and construct a training facility. No specific location has been determined but industrial use areas work well. The facility would include a "live firc" training facility for "hands-on" manipulated training. The project would include a multi-story "burn" training tower/hose rack. Probable improvements would include a drafting pit, pipe/trench. classrooms. observation tower and other numerous situation devices or props including potential aircraft response. > 1>( Justification/Requirement for Project: :i I' The proposed facility would enable the Fire Department to continue to meet mandated and recommended training requirements. Training while .... . on-site and on-duty is cost-effective. Additionally. squads undergoing training would be available as 2nd alarm response crews. Lastly, the ..... pumping capabilities of each pumper can continue to be tested without risk to the pumps. i i it Consequences of Not Completing Project: . ." Training would continue in its current ad hoc manner at various locations. it Reference Document: Pr~;cct Timing: t Fire Department staff planning. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay . acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this I engagement, thus all project cosl default to the "Build-out" column. 20/0- II Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Y cars Design/Inspection! Admirtisrration SO SO SO $0 ! S290, 149 S290, 149 ,....... 1 Land Acquisition/Right of "' ay SO $0 $0 SO SlJ"1.1..l0 SI ,372. 140 ! Cunsrruction SO $0 $0 SD S2.691.483 S2.691,483 I COJlfuJgency $0 $0 SO SO : $127.050 ' $127,050 , EquipmeJJt/Other $0 SO $0 $0 ! $210.000 S210,OOO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 $4.690,822 $4,690,822 I Potential Funding Sources: I - - - loa ,.. it [ t t ; I I I E I I I I I I I General Fund rc\:enucs, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax mcasur~ 29 I (,) I] _1)',2006 City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project De . (/ .... .. ... ....... Project Title: Progrll1D: Acquire Two Comman~ Vehicles Fire Suppression Facilitics. Vehicles and Equipment Submining Department!s): Prop No.: Fire Department FD-ll .< P~i<<t Description: ............. Acquire two command vehicles. : : Justification/Requirement for P~;cct: ? The need for additional command vehicles is the result of a growing department potentially culminating up to thirteen stations and almots 170 fire-fighters. The additional growth from residential and business development in the community will increase the likelihood of simultaneous responses necessitating additional command vehicles. . .::.. : . ... Consequences of Not Completing Project: ......... The existing number of command vehicles would have to be sufficient. : , : Reference Document: Prqjcet Timing; (. Fire Department staff planning. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay ....... acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. ) 2010-11 Tots} PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all I EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I.. Design/Inspection! AdllUnistrlJtion SO SO SO SO I SO $0 ........ Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO $0 $0 $0 ! COllStruction SO SO SO $0 SO SO i .... Contingency . SO SO SO $0 SO $0 Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO S90,OOO S90,OOO ....... TOTAL COST SO $0 $0 SO ) S90,OOO S90,OOO I Potential Fundin~ Sources: , 30 I General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. i tail (,j .!)ij lIMaq.~.:".. ..... ...<. ... ..... ....... ... .....< ... .. ..... . ...... ........ .... ! City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I .. ... I...... .... ......... ........ . ... ... .... ..< ........... Prop:t Tide: Program: Acquire Fout Squad Vehicle. Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Deputment(s): Project No.: Fire Department FD-12 .... Project Description: ... Acquire four squad vehicles. ... . ... i ... ..... Justification/Requirement for Project: ......... <i .......... , Iii ... I... I , Consequences of Not Completing Prq}cct: I ....... I .......... .. . ;'1 Reference Document: I Project Timing: F. ! i Fire Department staff planning. I The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay I I I acquisition desctibed herein, was not included in the scope: of this i I engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. I ... I 201D-i/ TO/Ill I PROPOSED 2006-()7 2oo7-()8 2008-09 2009-10 tJJrough sJJ ..... I I EXPENDITURES Build-out Y cars ... ! $0 I i Design/lnspection/ AdJDinjstration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .<< , I i i I 1 I Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 , I $0 I C .:msrruction $0 i $0 , $0 . $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I / , Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 ! $480.000 $480,000 .... I TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 $480,000 .... I Porc:JltiaJ Fundin~ Sources: - .. ~ l. c I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression DevelIJpme.nt Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax. measure. i I I (e) 31 J.....,-. 2006 I -: ./ .... ...........,...,....... ..... .. ,.. ... .. .............7./7/. ,.. ...... I · .......... ..... ......../....i)..i//. City of San Bernardino /..............................'..... ! .., ......./... .... f)i) I Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I .'. . . .'. .. .. . ~ie<:tTjrJe: Program: . . Acquire Three Sedans and. Utility Truclt Fire Suppression FacUities. Vehicles and EquiplllOlll Suhmitting Deporrmenr(.): Project No.: .... Fire Department FD-13 i Prq,;cct Dcscriptjon: .., Acquire Fire Administrative Vehicles Acquire three sedans for inspections services and a utility truck. for fleet maintenance. ..... ......... ..... // . . ... Justification/Requirement for Projecf: There will be an increase in the number of annual inspections. Additionally. there is need for an additional utility vehicle for routine pick-up ..... .. and delivery of needed supplies and fleet maintenance parts. Increased fIre suppression response capabilities by improving the rue-fighting i'" conditions. .i ? ... \, .' Consequences of Not Completing P~ject: , Inspectors and fleet maintenance staff would not be able to work under optimum conditions. ...... . /? ......... .'i I Reference Document: Project Timing: ........ Ii Fire Department: staff planning. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay I, ...... acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this Ii engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. Ii I ..... I 2010-11 TotAl \. \ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-0S 200S-09 2009-10 through All . EXPENDITURES Build-out Yeus ; Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .... Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ,. $0 i I. Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 , $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ...... Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,500 $94.500 I TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,500 $94,500 Potential Funding Sources: . 32 General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development lmp~t Fees and potentially a voter-approvcd tax measure. ..... Ii (e) .... . . > -".2llO& .......... .. '"' .. m II I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I t I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I .. ...... .i ,. i.......... Project Title: Program: Acquire a Reserve Engine Fire Suppression Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment i Submitting Depsrtmont(s): Project No.: Fire Department FD-14 , P~ject Description: Ii> Acquire 8 reserve engine/pumper at $425,000. ... . . .\ Ii I JustifjCJjuonlRequiremcnt for Project: i The addition of the proposed stations requires the addition of six front-line engine/pumpers to be assigned to the new stations. Three additional engine/pumpers arc: required to maintain a SO% reserve capability. iii {> .... >> Consequences of Not Completing Project: .......... ..... The front-line vehicles would become over-used and subject to a greater rate of break-down without routine and scheduled maintenance, requiring back-up vehicles. { .... Iii > Reference Document: Project Timing: Ii> Fire Department staff planning. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this Ii? ... engagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010- JJ Total .. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all I EXPENDITURES Build-out Years .. ! Design/Inspection/ Adrrtinistration SO SO SO SO SO SO >i i I LIUJd Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO . \ .. Construction SO SO SO SO SO SO .. Contingency SO SO SO SO SO SO I I Equipment/Other I SO SO SO SO SI.275.ooo S1.275.ooo i TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S1.275.ooo S1.275,ooo \ I . Potential FWJding Sources: 33 General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tall. measurc_ Ii (e) ...... < >. _.2lllllI ~ .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ll" ! .. I ..ii .' . ........... . ... .... I City of San Bernardino I.' , ...... Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Ii I ...i......... '.ii .... I .i .. .... I P"!;ecr Tid.: Program: Acquir. Additional Allsignod Fire-fighter Equipment Fire Supprcuion Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment SubllUlling Dcpartmcnr(s): Project No.: Fire Department FIHS ...... Project Description: lit Acquisition of equipment assigned to each fllcfightcr. It costs the City some $4.895 to recruit/outfit each fucfighrer and there will be a need for 12 additional firefighters assigned to the proposed Station #223. I ... Justification/Requirement for ProJect: iii ,ii Firefighters require specialty equipment and cannot perform their unusual or specifiC duties without it. ..... ........... ....... ........ i I t Consequences of Nor Completing Project: Sharing of personal equipment is not an option. ii I I 1 , .. i Reference Document: Project Timing: I I I Fire Department staff planning. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this ........ engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 1:1 2010-11 Total .' PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years , .' Design/Inspection! AdminJstrlJtion $0 SO SO SO $0 $0 ... Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO $0 SO SO $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO SO $0 Contingency SO SO $0 SO SO $0 i Equipment/OtJler SO $0 SO i SO S58.740 S58,74O TOTAL COST SO $0 $0 SO S58.740 S58,74O .... I Potenrial Funding Sources: 34 General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially II voter-approved tax measure. I (e) . . ...... ....::.... ../ ...... . : ...... ......-C; ..... .... .. ..... .. .... ... ~;- :,:;,:,;;-;:;",.,::",,:.;,... :::.:.,::".~:~.,::,., E I' "I I I I I I I I I I r .. I I I I I ... .. I ... .... .<......... .... ... ..... I ii .ii......... ..................<... , City of San Bernardino i , ...ii.....i... I Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ..i I .'. . Project Title: Progt8lD: Headquarters Station #221 Debt Service Fire Suppression Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Deputment(s): Project No.: .. .. Fire Department FD-16 p~jccr Description: i Make remaining payments on the Headquarters debt service schedule. < it i' JustifiationlRcquircmcnr for Proiect: .. The debt service payments must be made. i ii ii' i i Consequences of Not Completing Pr~jcct: .... Default on the payment schedule is not an option. " i' i .... i Reference Document: Projoct Timing: it Debt service schedule. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital ouday acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this .... engagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-outM column. ........... I t I 20JD-lJ TotJli , PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-D9 2009-JO through IllJ I , EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Years , .. , I.i , I Design/Inspection! AdmiIUstration $0 $0 $0 SO SI.794.425 SI.794,425 I LlUJd Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO $0 SO SO $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 I .... i Contingency SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 , i Equipment/Other SO SO SO $0 SO $0 I I I TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO ! S1.794,425 S 1.794 ,425 Potential Funding Sources: 35 i General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentiall)' a voter-approved tax measure. I I , (c) . __.lIlO6 ... . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "" ill I . , I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Iii.......... i .. ..< ........\.< ....... .<<.. ...... ........ I .. <..... .C7' ..... ... , PtC!ject Tid.: Progrom: \ Vcrdemont Station #232 Debt Service Fire Suppression FacilitiCi, Vehicles and Equipment i Submitting Departm<JIt{s}: PTt!jecI No.: Fire Department FD-17 Project Description: !i ...... Make remaining payments on the Valdcmontc Station debt servic:c schedule. I .. I Justj!jcationlRcquiremcnt for Project: Ii .. The debt service payments must be made. Iri ... .. r <il COJJscqUeI1CCS of Not Completing Prq,ject: r Default on the payment schedule is not an option. .\ I , I .i. ! Reference Document: Project Timing: 'ii I Debt service schedule. The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay i acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this i.' I cogagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. ... Ji 201D-JI Tot.J . , PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through aJ1 ! , EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I Desj~n/lnspcctjon/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $3.582.641 $3.582.641 ...... La.ud AcquisitionlRi/Zht of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C DIlStruction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 hi EquipmeJJt/Oth~r $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3.582.641 $3.582.641 ! I Potential Funding Sources: 36 G<:ncral Fund revenues, 'Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. ! i i I I (e) ./5S./i ....... ../...................... .. / ..... .......... .....> ..................// ,". _:.:,',;",'.,.)/~%@n;:tr(,:? , E I E ~ E t t I I I I I I ; I I: "" ... .. .. m m I I I I I i I , 1- ..~ I I I I I I I E City of San Bernardino Circulation System Streets, Signals and Bridges 37 ... iii ; ~ m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I: - 8- '~-i. ~ ~1f'; III ~ ~ g I ii! I ~.. l: ~ ... 'a r;;1ll ~ , "- ~ "- <:> , ~ ~ , g '" ~ , ~ E; s ~ "l i 1l ~ l .. .!!! ~l ,<, i$ c:: ~i i'E a: .'i ,~ ~ ~ .".." .. ~.... ~ :'::'" " " ~ ... .. 6 '" ~.." .... ....ll c S " I '" ~ I: ::=; .:! .....d ..... < .....: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ",..;~_.....;..;..;...;..;"'; ";0"''''; ....; _.._::;...._"'...;8 '" "" ... "" "'" wt .... ... ""... "'" "'" .... loft ... ""...... ... .... "",Iil ti I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ti~ ~~~~~;;;~z; ~~tl;;"'~ ;;a;; ;;t;;;,:,< $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a\ $ a $ a $ $ $ $ $ $ a $ $ a $ a $ a a a $ $ a $ $ $ $ $ i ..... $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ a $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ a $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ '.' I I I $1 $ a $ $ $ a $ $ a $ $ $ $ $ a $ a $ $ $ a a $ $ $ $ $ $ ail I? ..... I , "' ~I I I I I , I I ~I ' I ,l~ ~f ~ 1 s . oll -:; '\l i ~~i!~iil~ I ~;~ i~=~~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ l ~ ~ i Il Il ~I' ~II' 1& S ! i s I ~ 1 ]!I s s . .. S \j . -<,::li ~ a! .. . i! ~ f .i ::l \j' ! 1; ~ ~ ~ "" - :!! - ;:..... ~;I Q Q ~ ~ If! Q:!".I " c.. \I t .9 !!l lI'Ji ! t'\j ~ ~ 0\ ~ 21 \I ~ ~ :: .9 ~::i s. s 0 .I...~ ~ ~ Ii ~ ~ S! C ~: ~ l' I .:11' i <.J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : is:.' .'" ~: ~i "ig .~ II ~ oll ~ ;,a \.. "- ~ :;: I oil. ~. ~ "c: ! i" ; :t ~ Q5 Q5 :J. ~, ~ .a - ~ Q ~ .~ 0 ~ 11 ~)~. 11 Q i S I "l! '< /j,:! ~ E It l .. 5~... E ~ 0' 0 ~ - 8 0 . 0' 0 0 -1- . "' ~ ~ III ~ 1; ;:: ... .. ~ (l' " " I ~ e ~ :" ~,~ ~ .5 i '" ~ ~ i Eli i ~ I ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ::i ! ! ! ::li of ~E - -I - - :.. 0 I '" i! .l! E . "\ ~ 0 ~ ~ -II a ~ ~ ~ - ~ jii i \ i i ;11 : I ; ~ ; ; ~ a ~ a ~ i ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::li ::li ~ ::li ~ ~i~ f ~ 9 ~ 9 ~ 91~ 9 ~ ~:~!~. ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~I ~ ~ ~:~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~I~i~ ~~~:~i~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l~,~ ~:~ ~ ~ 111 ""', 8' S a .~ " ., .c: & ~ . II .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ~ I ~ :!! ~ a 1 6 ~ . . s a '3 .l! -ll .l! ~ .!l. ~ 'Ii . " . ~ . . .. 1i .~ 0- . :s (; ;; . 6 ~ ~ . "5 < ~ '" < ~ i .. ~ ... 38 ~ - ~ '" co C\J Ol <( U c: E ~ ~ "3 LL u ..J ..J '" - .!!! OJ 'u Q) c- oo 'iii o U "0 c: os Q) ::l c: Q) > Q) a: ... .. ; I I I I I I I ; I I , I Ii . I I E - 8- .~~ ~ e"" f;;; a.;~ r:. 8li.! ~]~ /':If';<l:l ~ , " ~ " Q I ~ ~ , 8 '" ~ I I. ~ I I I .!Il I .. I R I .~ ~ ~ 1'~2t:i I ~~ ~ co:.:::~ .f! .~ 5 '" ~.'" i ...o....!! I S ~ I I ~ VI ~ I Ie ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~* ::i :; :; ::l :; ::l .. .. :I .. .. .. .. .. :I .. :I .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. :I .. "IiI ~ ~. ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ! ~ ;:j ~ ~ ~ ;:j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::; ~ ~ ~ t:; t:; = ~ ::; ~ I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< a a a a a a a I< a a I< I< I< I< I< I< a a I< I< I< I< I< I< a I< a a a a I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< a. ..:. ... I 1<1 I I I I 1<1. I< I< I< I< I< I< a I< I< I< I< I< I< a a I< I< I< I< a a I< I< I< I< a I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< I< a I< I< I< I< a a a I< I< a I< a I< I< I< I< I< I< I< e 1/ .!l ~ '" .,. ~ ~ 1 i ! oll & I ~ .~ t 1 1 ! ~l iJl1! 1! G J:dl lli~ J. .. .11 !. l~::~ ~~~ i ~ I I I ~ I ~ t ~ ! 1 111 ~ .SCl"'ll~~.A.~;sli.!.s.! t j ~ I I I ~ 1 ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ! I I I ~ ~ . a ~ ~ ! J J J J i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ a r;; <ll ! :s ::l <l: <l: <l: <l: <l: a (l (l '* I.l ::l :s :s ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ; ~ 111'11'1111111111 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~. ~ ~ ~ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! o _ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ _ Q g _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\I- ~ 0 .,- '"'i f"'\ .-, '-J ""I 1"\ ""I f"'\ ""II '"'I T .,. ..,. :r J :r ,. ,. .,. T ~ h ~ ~ hl~ ~! ~ ~ ~i ht~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ hlh ~ ~ ~ ~ Vl ~I ~ ~ ~I ~I~ ~ ~ Vl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ I ~ ~ ti .! a ~ i J ] ~ " 111 " .~ .. J ~ 1 ~ J li ~i~~!li 1 . 1 ~ i . . ~ ~ ~I ~, ~ ! ! ~I~: :i;C;::i .-; c ~i ~I ~\~\~ ~ ~ lllll 1 111 " "[(Ii fI') fI') .. "l ~ ~~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~i ai! ! ! ! ~II JI ~...:! ~h, ~ ~ ~i fi;: (lji :;;1 Wii Wi ~ ~ ~ . ! i s ... ~ ~ . . s s '5 .e ~ . 1; .!!. e ... ~ 1 . . " l e ... . s ... . " . i o . '5 . .~ .. 5 .% 1; ", .~ F39 ~- ~ M co '" '" <( () c B j :i u. () ...i ...i iii .~ OJ .u Q) Q. r/) - U) o () ~ c .. Q) " c '" > Q) a: ... III I I I I I I I I I I I ; I I I I I E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ la i ;; .1.... _.: : :..: -'- _I ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~. ~. ~ ~ ~. ~i ~li ~ 1 f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ ! ~ !I.i il" ~ e"'l Ii - I::j ~ ~ "I I. - I..i~jii: ~'ar;:; lQ i i a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ari ~ . ..:.. I.. Ii ~ 1..,.- .::. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ai ai ..... <:> I.. .. i ~ Ii i.. Iii i i a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a al ~ , ii. Ii 8 I.. '" ~ ~ ~ .. - aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa "i I....:. Ii Ii i . ,.- ... .. 5 . ~ I i i .~ Ii ~ii I. ! ~ ~ I ! j :t 1 ~.~ aa a l) '" " ~ i" .:l - it "i" 4 ~~ ~f !:3 i~ ~ 1:!d==~e.li! -""" ~ t ~~ J i I I J ~ f f ! 1 1 a ~ - 1 i 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 111 ~ ~ . ~ ~ i I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ I I I .... .' 1l..:>:>11\:it:lil..rl';111EE1 1 I!! ~ ! ! 1 i 1 t i ~ 1 1 1 1 a I! ! J J i i i i .. II " tiS ....... :t ;. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. :t :; ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ! I ;:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ...... 'll,1i! .i _ _ _ .. _ III III _ _ _ III III III _ _ _ _ III III III _ _ III III III III - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\- ~ .g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ j i ~ I i I i I i j ! ~ l ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ~ ~ i .~ =.~ ~ ~ ~ ! i~ ~ \.; '" '" ~ , ~I~ l:i~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i - ~ ; ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~I~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" <Xl '" '" <( t) c: g j "3 u. " ~ "lI Q ~ l! ~ S - .!. ~ . -s s " . -l! {: :! l ~ " . 1 . . .. ;j .i!- t) e .. ...i . :s ...i "0 .; ~ ~ .!!! i a; 'y Cll Q Co . en c; - ~ If) .~ 0 ... () .5 ." & c: i tll Cll .. 0 " :tl: c: c; . 40 Cll ",- > Cll a: - . Ill' . ,. .. E I I I I I I I I I ; I I I I I ; _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ -8- ~g~~~g~g~~~~~!~~ ~ tl~l;'~S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ al I . . 811 , ~ ~:!:l Q'" '51 "''''CQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Q ~ ~ ~ N N N N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. a '.' .'. a h l!l , "- ~ ....... a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a !i a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a "- Q ~ I I a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ I 8 '" a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ I ~ I I i' \) i i ~ ,~ IIi ...... I! f i f ~ i' f Ii !i - il: \) ~ \) ~ t I ~ 0 ~ e ! l ~ ) I I! ~! a t ~ a i' :l ~!F 1 ! ~ -l0 <Il' j oil iii :Z::i . !it " i il' I ! ~ u ~ ~ ~ oj ~ ~ u 1 '" ~ "'=II'~lIil~sil t~i~i '_ .!l I:! ... \2 . il is !~,- tls il: f ~ ~ ! ~ ~ !! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~I( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 j I ~ l ! ! Ii ~ ~~~~~22Qec::.>>-':':&J.&, _ ....~NNNNN~......'::Ie:::Q~J I ..!, J., J., J.. ..!, J. ..!.. oJ. ..!.. ..!., ... :; .:I!ill <.... ,1lO ~ ~ " " " " " " " " ~ .. '" .. :z: ,g ~ ~ t tit i J l ~ t a * · · " " " 'E~~ ~~~!~ !~~!i!!!"!](i ~:~~\ll}}l 111}1!!l!l '=:"" ~~~~~~~~~~l-llttoll'l~L ~~.~ .!l.s~~~~~~.!~...s~~.s~ ' 'os'; 0 :,~ = ~ 1.:li~I=llliiO: ~; Ii';: I ~ I 8: 2:- G ~ u! l~:~\~l~l~l~1 ~ ~ ~\~!~i~i~ ~ ~ ~ I I a c: e ~ Q ~ :!l ~ 2 - 2 ~ . -s 2 'S J! -Il ~ Q .1< ~ 1i ~ . e . . "" 1i I< E Q. . S "l; 1; . ~ ~ Q . 15 ~ .~ '" ~ ~ 1; . . '0' tl\: 15 . "" - ~ '" <Xl '" '" <( u c: B ~ .!!1 "3 u. U .J .J .,; .~ 1ii "(3 Q) 0- W 41 - '" o U "0 c: 01 CD ::> c: CD > CD a: ... II t t ; I I E I' ". I I I I ; I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulotion (S_. SipWl and Bridges) SylllClll Project Tirl.: 40th Street. AJ;re Lane to Electric Avenue SubmitriDg Dcpartmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-oI Pro,jc<t Description: Widen 40th Street from two lanes to four lanes for from Acre Lane to Elcct:ric Avenue addingapproximatdy 0.35 lane mila of arterial/collector to the City' s existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the propoHd additional major road segments I"ftlltainod in ST-ol through 5T-36 will rcprClCllt a mcr. 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan buUd-out while the existing community has __ 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the mojor road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. materia1s1IOUlleIling and project administration COltS have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at lO~ of construction costs. Justi/ieation/RcquircllJent for Pl'C!ject: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will usm in a..ommodating tho nearly 58% in.rcsse in doUy trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out reaulting from new development. This segmcnt of roadway will provide an altccmativc for drivers who have been displaecd from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previoualy been able to use but now flDd at maximum canying capacity. The City can 0llp0Ct an additional 57% incrcsse in the Dumber of doUy trip-mUes from tho .urrent 5,050.289 daUy trip-miles to roughly 7.973.974 doUy trip-mUes. an in.r.... of 2.923.685 daUy trip miles. There are limits as to how many additiona1lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additiona1lane mila), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signal. where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of 5erYic:e (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201D-ll TouJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2ooB-<}9 2009-10 through oJ] EXPENDITURES Build-out Yean Design/Inspection/Administration SO $0 SO SO $260.400 $260,400 Land A.quisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 SO SO Construction $0 SO $0 $0 $1.736.000 $1.736.000 Contingency SO $0 $0 $0 $173,600 $173,600 Equipment/Other SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO SO $0 $0 $2.170.000 $2.170.000 I Potential Funding Sources: - A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction it &aIDe projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. i (.j ........,.2IIlIll ... III t I I ; I I I I I I I ; I I I I I E (el City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projot:t TW.: 5th Sired, Sterling to Victoria Program: Circulation (Streets, Sipols and BrilIg..) SyllCm Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projot:t No.: ST -02 Projot:t Description: Widen 5th Street from two lane. to four 1.... from Sterling to Victoria odding approxilllatcly 2.0 Ian. mil.. of arterial/collector to the City'. existing inventory of 618.32 lane mil... All of the proposed oddilioaa1 major rood segD1Cllll CODllIined in ST -01 through ST -36 will represcAt a mere 6.4% of the ,otAl 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community Iw generated 92.6% (688.32 mil..) of the major rood miles. Engineering plan check, inspcetion. materials/soils testing and project administration com have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JusdfjationlRequircment for Project: This seelion of "major" roodway (arterial or collector) is required to complClC the General Plan Circulation System and will aasiat in accommodating the nearly 58% incr.... in daily trip-mil.. at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segmen' of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segmenta. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use bu' now flDd at maximum carrying apacity. The City can cxpect an oddilional 57% inc..... in the nunabcr of daily trip-mil.. from the cur...' 5,050,289 daily trip-mil.. to rougbiy 7,973,974 daily trip-mil.., an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip mil... There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additionallanc miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the exilting 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Pr~jecr: Failure or inability to widen strcct5, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Projot:t Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort, Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through .n EXPENDiTURES Build-our Year, Designlbz.pcctionl AdmiJUItratjon $0 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 $384,000 Land Acquisition/Right of W.lIIY SO SO $0 SO $0 $0 C Ollsrructioll SO ' SO SO $0 $2,560,000 $2,560,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 SO S256,ooo $256,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 Potential Funding Sources: 43 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some proJccts listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. .. lit , I m i I E I I E I I ; E t ~ I I . it City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project nile: 5th Street, Warm Creek to Pedley Program: CirculatiOJl (StreeU, Signals and Bridges) Syatem Submjrting Deputmenr(s): Developmen. Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST~3 p~jt:ct Description: Widen 5th Srreet from two lane to four lanes from Warm Creek to Pedley odding appro_y 1.0 lane mile of arterial/collector to the City'. existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed odditional major rood aegmonu COJIt.ained in ST ~I through ST -36 will represent a mer. 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan buUd-out while the cltisting community hu generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major rood miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. material./soils testing and project adminiltration costs have been included at lSS DC COIIItrUction costs and contingency has been included at lOW, of construction costs. JustifiClJrionlRcquircllJcnt for P~jcc:t: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in .accommodating the nearly S8~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting. from new development. This sepent of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S7~ increase in the number of daily trip-mUes from the current 5,050,289 dally trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-miles, an incr..... of 2,923,685 dally trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane. miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necess&ry to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Proj<<;t: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow. and is identificd as "long queues ofvchicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "lammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with thc City:s Circulation Element. Proiect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current cffort. Thcrefore all projects default to the "BuUd-out" column. 20/Q-J/ TouJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-()9 2009-/0 through .0 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $57.600 $57,600 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction SO $0 $0 $0 $384,000 $384,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $38.400 $38,400 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $480.000 $480,000 Potentia} Fundinj! Sources: -\ -:ombmation of unobli)!arcd monies from a variery of funds. devc:lopment impact fees. and specific agreements. projects hsted may bc required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would bc reccived. 44 The construction of somc (0) . . , 1).2lOlt .. ..... ... i. E I I E I E m I I I II Iii I t I I t E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Alabama Str.... 3rd to City Limits Prognm: Circulation (Streets. Signal. and Bridges) Sy...... Submitting Deportmfllft(S): Development Services Departm..t (Enginec:ring) Project No.: ST -()4 Project DescriptiOll: Widen Alabama Street from two lanes to four lanes Crom.)rd Stroet to City Limits adding approximately 1.0 lane mile of arterial/collector to the City's existing inv..tory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the propoaed additioaal major road ..pents contained In ST-OI througb ST-36 will repre..nt a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out wbile the exi5tlng community has g..erated 92.6% (68g.32 mil..) ofthe major road miles. Engineering plan chcc:k, inspection. materials/lOila testing and project administration costs have been included at IS" of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justmcation/RequjremeDt for Prq,jcct: This soction of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist In accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new deve1opD1CJlt. This ICgmeat of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can. expect an additional 57% increase: in the number of daily trip-miles from the curr..t 5.050.289 dally trip-miles to rougbly 7.973.974 dally trip-miles, an increa.. of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additionallanc mUes), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. ConscquMces of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the InterleCtions of _ with bridges to Level E or F by acting u a bottl....k. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow. and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City:s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201o-11 TouJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO SO $0 $192.000 $192.000 LaJld Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 I $0 SO $0 SO I Construction SOl $0 SO SO $1.280.000 $1.280,000 ConruJgency SO SO SO $0 $128.000 $128.000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 $1.600.000 $1.600.000 Potential Funding Sources: ..... ...:,)mbinallOn 01 unobhgated momcs from a varidy of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. pruJl:cts listed may be required as a condition of approval. for whicJ1, a credit would be recclved. 45 The ...:onstruction of some r'::':::.:.':~~ .1006:.\:':: ... . ... .. E r II i I E E ~. , E t E I t I I ., I I t t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Proi<<t Titl.: C';"pus Parkway (Popper-Linden). Kenda1l1O 1-215 Prognm: Circulalion (S_. Signa1s and Bridl") SylleJll Submitting o.p.rtmont(,): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projoct No.: ST -05 Projoct DoscripUoo: ConstrllCl the four lane Caropu, Parkway Extcosion from Kcnda1l1O 1-215. A110 constrIICla partial diamond interehanle. All of the proposed additional major road selmentl contained in ST-oI through ST-36 will rcproaenla mere 6.4" of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existinl community has lonerated 92.6" (688.32 mil..) of the major road mil... Eolinccrin& plan check. inspection, materials/lOils testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10'1 of construction costs. Ju,tiIi_onIRequircmont for Project: This section of "major" roadway (artcrial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and willauist in accommodating the nearly 58'1 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City caD. expect an additional 57'1 increue in the number of daily trip-miles from the currenl 5.050.289 dally trip-mil.. to roughly 7.973.974 dally trip-mil... an increase of 2.923.685 daily trip mil... Th_ arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constt:ucted (46.8 additiOJUl! lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Nor Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and install signal. where wanantcd and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridl" to Level E or F by actinl" a bottleneck. Level "E" i, "Unalable Flow" and ia identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection", Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement", Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. P"!;cct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-1/ ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2oo8-G9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/lnspection/ Administntion SO SO SO $0 $576,000 $576.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO S3,840,OOO S3,840,ooo Contingency SO SO SO SO $384,000 S384,ooo Equipmtnt/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 $4,800.000 $4,800.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and spcclfic agreements. The construction ~6somc projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. (cl .... ,.-.:.... ;:",,;,.,:: .;.:.;.;....... .. - "" . ,. 'Ij,;,,\ .. fill II i I I t 11II. ., E t I i I I I I t m City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro.i"'" Title: CClltrll (Pllm Mcadow.), Tippecanoe to Mountain View Progrom: Circulation (Strceu, Signll. and Bridge.) System Submitting DcpartmCllt(S): Oeve!opmCIII Services OepartmClll (Engineering) Project No.: ST -()6 Pro.i"'" Description: Widen Central Avenue from tow lane to four lanes from Tippecanoe to Mountain View adding approximately 2.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City' 5 existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments ~t.inM in ST -0 I through 5T-36 will reprOSClll a mero 6.4\\ of tho total 735,21 at GClleral Pion buUd-out while the existing oommllllily has generated 92.6\\ (688.32 mUes) of the major road milos. Engineering pion .heek, inspc<tion. materia1s/anU. testing and projc<t administration COIls have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at tOll of construction costs. JustifiClltionlRcquUcmcnt for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Pial Circulation System and will assilt in accommodating the nearly S8~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This ICgment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously bcon able to use but now fuul at maximum carrying eapaoily. The CiIy can expect an additional 57\\ in...... in the numhcr of dally trip-mUe. from the .UlfCllt 5,050.289 dally trip-mile. to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-milos, an in.r.... of 2.923,685 daUy trip mil... There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and iI identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimatC$ that are consiJtc:nt with the City's Circulation Element. Pro.i<<' Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO $0 $0 $0 $384,000 $384,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO $0 $0 SO SO Construction $0 $0 SO $0 $2,560,000 $2,560,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 SO S256,OOO $256,000 Equipment/Other $0 SO $0 SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 SO $0 $0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 Potenti4l Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 47 The 00lIIlrUC:li0n of SOIllC (,j . ..-.,.2I111r...: - - !lilt . r .. " .. & I I I ~ I ; I I I I I I I I ',. I E m City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~jecl Titl.: Coulston, Tippecanoe to Mountain View Program: Circulltion (SltOOtI, Sisnol. and Bridg..) Syllom SublDittillg DopartmOD/(S): DevelopmOlll Servic.. Department (Engineering) Projoct No,: ST -07 P~jec/ Description: Widen Coulston from tow lane to four lanes from Tippecanoe to Mountain View adding approximately 2.2 llUle miles of arterial/collector to the City' 5 .xisting inventory of 688.32 lane mile.. All of the proposed additional major road ..gmcnlS contained in ST -01 through ST -36 will represent. mere 6.4~ of thetota! 735,21 .t General Plan buUd-ou/ while the exiJting community bas generatccl 92,6~ (688,32 mil..) ohhe major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at lO~ of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will UIiJt in accommodating the nearly S8~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now rmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an. additional 57% increase in the number of daily "ip-mUe. from the current 5,050,289 daily "ip-mil..to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-mil.., an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip mil.., Ther. are limits as to how many additional lane miles ean be constructed (46.8 additiona1lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely neceuary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing c:ollectoralanerials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signal. where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) ".mc now at the intersections of slr.... with bridg.. to Level E or F by acting as. bottleneck, Level "E" i. "Unstable Flow" and is identified as ~long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference DoclUl1ent: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Projoct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-1/ TotlJJ PROPOSED 2006--07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through .0 EXPENDITURES Build-out y.... /)csign/lnspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $422,400 $422,400 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,816,000 $2,816,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 I $281.600 $281.600 , Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,520.000 $3,520,000 Potential FWJCfing Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. I projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 48 The constnaction of some (0) '-Y.2lO6 . . - - "" .. r' . t' i i ; I iii .. I ; I p II : ! I', .. I ; E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgTUJ: CircuJalioJl (5_, 5ip.W and Bridges) 5yllem Project Title: Connector, 3rd 5treet to 5th 5treet Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No,: ST -os Projocr Description: Construct a four lane coMcctor from 3rd Street to 5th Street adding approximately 2.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's eJtilting invenlory of 688,32 lane miles, All of the proposed additional major rood ..g....... c:onWned in 5T-01 through 5T-36 wW represent a mere 6,4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan bulld-out wblle the existing community has gCDOrated 92.6% (688,32 miles) of the major rood miles, Engineering plan <heck. inspaction, materials/aoll. testing and project admilliJtralion COIl> have been included at 15% of COIlIlruClion COIl> and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustifiC4tionlRt:quirement for Prqjcct: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will au_ in accommodating the nearly 58 % incr.... in dally trip-miles at General Plan bulld-out resulting from new development. This..gmeat of roadway will provide an alternative fot drivers who have been displaced from roadway segmenta. unable to be widened, that they have previously b_ able to u.. but now fmd at maximum c:anying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% inereesa in the IIIIIIIber of dally lrip-miles from the .urrent5,050,289 dally trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-miles, an in.r.... of 2,923,685 dally trip miles, There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additionallanc milu). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and insta1l signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridgcs to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level NE" is NUnstable Flow" and is identified as Nlong queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced flowN creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations :restrict or prevent movement".' Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-outN column. 201D-1I ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out YeatS Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S384,OOO S384,OOO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO $0 SO $0 $0 Construction SO $0 $0 SO S2,560,OOO S2,56O,OOO Contingency SO $0 $0 SO S256,OOO S256,000 Equipm<nt/Orhar SO $0 $0 SO SO $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO S3.2oo,OOO S3,2oo,000 fu<n~~~~u~ ~ A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agrccmcnts. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (e) .--. ,._,,, ..... . "',,',.2111I&::';' - .. . .../i -- 7> .. .. > .i< .. .'. , .... Ii. . I City of San Bernardino liiii , . , . Master Facilities Plan Project Detail 1.....:._ .. . ...........i.. ....... I:i.ii .. ..i .. ... Project Title: Prognm: Del Rosa, 6th StrecI to 9th Street Circulation (SlrcctI, Sipal. and BridS") System Submitting Dcpartmcn/(s): Project No.: i Development Se..i... Department (EnSineerins) ST~ i i: PTC?jcct DcKription: Iii Widen Del Rosa from two lanes to four lanes from 6th Street to 9th Street adding approximately 2.0 lane mllcs of artcrial/coUec:tDr to the City'. exillinB inventory of 688.32 lane mil... AU of the proposed additional major rood .._II contained in ST-QI throush ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the exillinS community has senerated 92.6% (688.32 mil..) of the i major road miles. Engineering plan cheek, inspection, matcrialslsoilstesting and project administration costs have been included at IS4I of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. it i JustjficatjonlRcqu~lIJent for ~ject: / ... .> This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will asaist in ii accommodatins the nearly 58 % increase in dally trip-mil.. at GcneraI Plan build-out rcoultins from new development. This .._t of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57lJ increase in the number of dally trip-mile. from the current 5,050,289 dally trip-miles to roushlY 7,973,974 dally trip-mil... an incr.... of 2,923,685 dally trip mil... There arc limits as to how many additiona1lanc miles can be constructed (46.8 additiona11anc miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where wananted and needed would reduce the Level of Service !/ (LOS) traffic flow at the intersection. of streeta with bridse. to Level E or F by actins u a bottleneck. Level "E" i. "Unstable Flow. and is t,II!~11 identiflCd .. "long queu.. of vehicl.. wailinS upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed eonditiona, back-upa from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . i Reference Document: Project Timing: i Staff cost estimates that ate consistent with the City',s Circulation Project timing is not a component of this current efeon. Therefore all i Element. projects default to the "Build-out" column. '. Iii 2010-// Total PROPOSED 2()()6-<J7 2()()7-oB 2()()8~ 2()()9-10 through oJ] " I EXPENDITURES Build-out Ycan I .... Desjgn/blSpc<:/ionl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $192.000 $192,000 ...... ! ti i Land Acquisitjon/Rjght of W,y $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i i $0 ii , Construction $0 $0 $0 $1.280.000 $1,280,000 i Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $128.000 $128,000 .. Equjpment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i' TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.600.000 $1.600,000 !.. Potential Funding Sources: The construction or2me Ii A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. I, projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. i (.) ....... . ... ." .~....>............i.. . ..... ... .. t ~ II" .. I E I . " E t E t E ~ .. I I t t - - ". - r* .. t ; I t ,. . I E , .. I: t .. .. II i E I E . .. .. E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~jot;r Tide: Electric. Mountain View to Northpark Program: Circulation (Streell, Signols and Bridges) Sylllem Submitring Depurlllenr(.): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projeet No.: ST-IO Projeet Description: Widen Elcc:tric Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Mountain View to Northpark adding approximately 2.0 lane miles DC anerial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road ..gments eontained in ST -0 I through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4$ of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing eommunity has generated 92.6$ (688.32 miles) of the major road mil... Engineering plan check, inspection, DWeriaI./soils testing and project ad_lion costs have "- included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10~ of construction costs. Justification/Requirement fOT Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assiJt in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 579G increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing colleetonlarterials. Cons<<Jucnces of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streell, eonstruet bridge widths and instaIlsigna1s where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting u a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Row" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Projeet Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201G-IJ Toral PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out y..... Design/Inspection! Adl1Uniltration $0 $0 $0 SO S384.OOO S384,OOO Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO S2.560,000 S2,560,OOO Contingency $0 $0 SO SO S256.OOO S256,ooo Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 SO S3.200,000 S3,200,000 Potentia} Funding Sources: A combination oi unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 51 The construction of some (c) -.,.:Illl>>"" .. - r- .. .. 1<l.,.. - t "" .. i t E c I r " t E II - I I i I E E E t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (SlReU, SignaIJ and Bridges) SylleJll Project Title: "G" Street. Mill to Rialto Avenue Submitting Doputment(s}: Development Services Departmen' (Engineering) Project No.: ST-lI Project Description: Widen "0" Street from two lanes to four lanes from Mill Street to,Rialto Avenue adding approximately 1.0 lane mile of arterial/Q)Uoctor to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road ..glllOlllS contained in ST-ol through ST-36 will repr...n' a mere 6.4\11 of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-au' while the existing community hu generated 92.6\11. (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justific.tionlRcquiremcnt for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 ~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 571 increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050,289 dally trip-miles '0 roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-miles, an iner.... of 2,923,685 dally trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additionallanc miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane mUes), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane mUes of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Nor Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow. and is identified as "long queuCi of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pro,;eet Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through a11 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ Adm.inistr41jon SO SO $0 $0 SI92,ooo $192.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 COIJstrucrion SO I SO SO $0 $1.280.000 SI.28O,OOO Contingency SO SO $0 $0 $128.000 SI28,ooo Equipment/Other SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO $0 SI,6OO,ooo SI,6OO,ooo Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements_ The construction~fsome projects listed may be: required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be rc:c:eived. (c) -.,. - - c ........... 'i .. ...... cc= 'c c.......7T7ffii2T---c7 . City of San Bernardino ... I .. iiii Master Facilities Plan Project Detail i'" . . .................. ......c........ ~ 7' 7' ---c ... ..c....:.c...... ." .. Project Title: Program: I "H" Street, Kendall to 40th Circulation (Strccl.I. SiBnals and Bridges) System C ., Submitting Department(s): Project No.: Development Service' Department (Engineering) ST-12 c .... Prqjcct Description: ii' Widen "H" Street from two lane. to four lanes from Kendall to 40th Street adding approximalely 0.4 lane miles of artcria1/c:olloctor to the ii City'. existing inventory of 688,32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road seglllOllls conWncd in ST-QI through ST-36 wUI represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 mila) of the > major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils tClting and projm administration costs have been included at lSII of ............. ...... construction costs and contingency has been included at lOti of construction costs. i ..... .. ...... Justification/Requirement for Prq,ject: " This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in . accommodating the nearly 58" increase in daily rrip-miles at Genera1 Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have ... previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity, The City can expect an additional 571 increase in the number of daily L trip-mile. from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-mile. to roughly 7,973,974 daily rrip-miles. an increase of 2,923,685 daily rrip miles. There 1;1 Ii are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectorsJa.ncrials. !i Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and in.stal1 signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of _ with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck, Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and iJ > identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream. of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditiOJlJ. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". I? L Iii Reference Document: Project Timing: i , Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Thcrefore all ? ! Element. projects default to the "Build-out" column. ? Ii? 2010-11 Tot.J Ii I PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oB 2008-09 2009- 10 through .JI ....... I EXPENDITURES Build-out YC4T8 ........ Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO $0 $0 $76,800 $76,800 Ii' I' , Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 SO SO .... I , , ! C oJJstruction I $0 SO $0 $0 ' $512,000 $512,000 i I<i I Contingency $0 SO $0 $0 $51,200 $51.2(0) Equipment/Other $0 SO $0 $0 SO H SO TOTAL COST SO SO $0 $0 $640,000 $640,000 j~l j Potential Fundinj! Sources: The construction ~f somc I A .:ombmahan 01 unablif.ated monies trom a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific ag.reements. I projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be recclved. , (el . ...... ... ..,..- . ,. , .. ~ .. r ; I E t E E r II t t , II E .. ... . m E I!Il ;; l"' ~ .. ,. l.. r Ilia P'" it , I t E E E t t E I t E c E 5 City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro,;"" Title: Kendall. Cambridge 10 Pine ProgrtUD: Circulllion (5_. SigJWs and Bridges) System Suhmiffing Dopsrtm<l1I(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Pro}oct No.: ST-13 P~jcct Description: Widen Kendall Drive from two lanes 10 four lanes from Cambridge 10 Pine adding opproJtimstely 1.5 lane miles of arterial/coUec:tor to the City', existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-oI through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4~ of the total 735.21 al Goncral Plan build-out while the existing community has genoraled 92.6~ (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan .heck, inspection, materials/soil'testing and projec:l administrllion costs have been included at15~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustilicatjonlRequiremf:IJt for Project: This section of Mmajor" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will un. in a..ommodating the nearly 58 ~ in.rease in dally lrip-miIes at General Plan build-oul reaulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivCl's who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying ~. The City can expecl an additional 57 % increase in the Dumber of dally trip-miles from the .urrent 5.050.289 dally Irip-miIeslo roughly 7,973.974 dally trip-miles, an in.r.... of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. The,. arc limits as to how many additional lane mlles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. COJJSei/uCJJCCS of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "EN is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvchicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Aow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". ReferelJce Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pro}oct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-/1 Totm PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out Years DesiglJ/lnspectionl AdmiJJjstration $0 SO $0 SO S420.000 S420.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO $0 SO SO $0 I C()Jlstrucrion SO SO SO SO S2.800.000 S2.800.000 ConritJgJ:lJcy SO $0 SO I SO I $280.000 S280,000 Equipmenr/Other SO $0 SO I SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 SO SO $0 S3,5OO,000 $3,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: A cQmbinatlOn of unobli1-'!atcd monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific a1-'!TCCmcnts. prvyxts listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 54 The construction of some (oj JaoioinJ. - .. ,... IIIl I"" Ii : ; I E t i E t E i c t s ' I ci I II E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: L.... Road, Mill to Orange Show Prognm: Circulotion (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) SyllCDl Submitting Doportment(s): Development Service. Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-14 Project Description: Construct Lena Road u a {our lane roadway from Mill Street to Orange Show Drive. adding approximately 4.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City'. eltilting inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major rood segmenll contained in ST-ol throup ST-36 will raprasent a mara 6.4% of tha total 735,21 at Genaral Plan build-out while tha altilting community has generated 92.6" (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 151. of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justi!jc.ationlRequirelDent for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating tha nearly 58" incr.... in dally trip-miles at General Plan bulld-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. UJl8.blc to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now flAd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S71.1 increase in the Dumber of daily trip-miles from tha current 5,050,289 daily trip-mil.. to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 dally trip mil... Thare are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Nut Completing I'r<!ject: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intcrscc:tions of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "E- is "Unstable Flow" and iI identiflCC!.. "long queues ofvchicles waiting Upllre8m of tha intersection". Level F, "Forced Row" crcatas "lammed conditions, back-upa from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aD projects default to the "Build-out" coluDUl. 2010-11 Toal PROPOSED 2fJ06-()7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Ycan Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 SO S768,000 $768,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 $0 SO SO $0 Construction SO SO SO SO , 55,120,000 S5,120,ooo Contingency SO SO SO SO $512.000 S512,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 S6,4OO,000 $6,400,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreemcnh. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 55 The construction of some (0) ....'}._.i:.:,::,.. - till - La t [ l E t E E E t E E E I II _I i I I ! , ! E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Lillie League Drive, Palm to 1-215 Program: Cir.ulation (Sueeu, SigDaU and 8ril1g..) System Submirring Department(.): O.velopm..t Services Deportm..t (Engineering) Project No.: ST-15 Proje'" Description: Wid.. Lillie League Drive from two I.... to four I.... from Palm Av..ue to the 1-215 Frontage Rood adding approximately 1.5 1ane miIco of arterial/coll..tor to the City's existing inv..tory of 688.32 l..e mil... All of the propoaed additioaa1 major rood segments ........;.... in ST-oI through ST-36 will rcpr....t a mere 6.4';1; of the total 735,21 at General PI.. bulld-out while the existing community baa geaerated 92.6';1; (688.32 mlles) of the major road mil... Enamcering plan check, inapeclion, materials/lOlls t..ring..d proj..t administration COltS bav. been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JU$/i/jcationlRequireJDent for Project: This section of "majorH roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist ill accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-mll.. from the curr..t 5,050,289 dally trip-mil.. to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-mil.., an in.r.... of 2,923,685 dally trip mil... There arc limits 85 to how many additiona11ane miles can be c:on.struc:ted (46.8 additional lane miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen strcctl. construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic now at th. int.rsections of streets with bridg..to Level E or F by acting as a bolli....k. L.vel "E" is "Unatable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Row" creates "Jammed conditioBl, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimatcs that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project TiJning: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Toto} PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-1J9 2009-10 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out y..,.. Design/Inspection! A.dministration SO $0 SO $0 $288,000 $288,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 $0 $0 SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO $1.920,000 $1.920,000 Contingency SO SO SO $0 $192,000 $192,000 Equipment/Other SO SO SO $0 SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 SO $0 $0 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 PotentiaJ Funding Sources: 56 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. (cl ~. - - ,. ... I'" .. r .. ... I. ~ c t 'III " c c t t ~ t I , \ I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail PN!jcct Title: lillleleague Drive, 1-215 frontage to Belmont Prognm: Circulalion (Streets, Signals snd Bridges) System Submitting Depsrtment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projet:t No.: ST-16 Project Description: Widen Little League Drive from two lanes to four lanes from the 1-215 Frontage Road to Belmont Avenue adding approximately 1.0 lane miles of artcrialfcollcd.or to the City's existing inventory of 688.321180 milg. All of the propoaed additional major road legmc:nts COJItained in ST-oI through ST-36 will represents mere 6.4~ of the total 735,21 at Cleneral PlIO build-out while the existing community has generated 92,6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plIO chccl<, inspection, materialslsoilstcsting snd project adminislrslion costs bave been included at 15~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Prqj<<t: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % incrcaac in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57<<! increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, 10 iner.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46,8 additional lane miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely nccossary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. ConsequCJlces of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or f by acting as a bottleneck. level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvehic:les waiting upstream of the intersection", Level F. "forced Aow" creates "Jammed conditionJ. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the CitJ's Circulation Element. Projet:t Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort, Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Toto} PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Adnzjnjstratjon $0 $0 $0 SO S192,000 S192,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 SO SO SO $0 Construction SO $0 $0 SO S 1,280,000 SI,280,000 Contingency SO $0 SO SO S128,000 S128,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 SO SO $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO SI,600,ooo SI.600,OOO PotenWl Funding Soun:cs: A combination of unobllgatcd manics from a variery. of funds. development impact fees, and speciflC agreements. The construction ~7 some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. (,) Iaoi..y. 2m"', ", ' ~ .. ".. .. r .. t ; s t t E [ t I t E ,. ilIl .. . I . .. E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgrtUD: Circulalion (Streets, SipaIJ and Bridl") Syllem Project Title: Lillie Molllllain, Devll Creek Channel to 48th Submirting DeputmCllt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-17 Pro.icct Description: Widen Little Mountain Drive from two lanes to four lanes from Devil Creek. Channel to 48th Street adding approximately 0.25 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments containccl in ST-ol through 5T-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the tolaI 735,2111 Ococrlll P1an bulld-out wbile the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. materialallOill testing and project administration colts have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at tO~ of construction costs. JustiEcaUonlRequireDJClJI for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assilt in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-mil.. at Ococrlll P1an bulld-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have prcvioullly been able to use but now fmd at DWtimum carrying capaeity. The City can upect an acIditiona1 57% incr.... in the number of claiJy trip-mile, from the curren' 5.050,289 daily trip-mil.. to roughly 7,973,974 claiJy trip-miI.., an iner.... of 2,923,685 claiJy trip mil... There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed. (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing P~;t:ct: Failure or inability to widen strcc:ts, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of strcc:ts with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pro}cct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotJJJ PROPOSED 200HJ7 2007-08 2008-1J9 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Y..... Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO $48.000 $48,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO S320,000 S320.000 Contingency SO SO SO SO S32.000 S32,OOO Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO $400,000 $400,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variery of funds, development impact fccs, and specific agreements. projccts listed may be required as a condition of approval, for whi,h a credit would be rcceived. . 5R The construction or some (e) -.y. _. ..:...... . - ... ",. lIII c ~ ; ~ t t t E ~ '1 ; I E E t E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: MUl, Pepper to Meridian Program: Circulation (Streets. Signal. and Bridg..) Syllelll Submitting Department(.): Development Services Depsrtment (Engineering) Projeet No.: ST-18 Projec' Description: Widen MUl Street from two Ian.. to four Ian.. from Pepper to Meridian addingapproximstely 0.5 lane mil.. of arterW/c:oI1ector to the City'. ellilting inventory of 688.32 lane mil... All of the propoaed additicmal major road segments containad in ST-oI through ST-36 wUl....." .-t a mere 6.4'11 of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the ellilting community bas generated 92.6'11 (688.32 mil..) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspec:tion, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 151 of construetion costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial Of collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will auist. in ",",ommodating the nearly 58 'I! incr.... in daily trip-mil.. at General Plan build-out r..u1ting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segmentl. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capscity. The City can expect an additional 57'1! inc..... in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-mil.. to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-mil.., an inc..... of 2,923,685 daily trip mil... There arc limits as to how many additionallanc miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mUe configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic now at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting.. a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unatable Flow" and is identified as -long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the interJeCtion-. Level F, -Forced Flow- creates N Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. P~ject Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2/J(}7-oS 2008-09 2()()9-1O through all EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Year. Design/Inspection/Administration $0 SO SO SO S96,000 $96.000 Land Acqu;sjtionlRigh' of Way $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 Construction SO $0 $0 $0 S64O,000 S64O.OOO Contingency $0 $0 SO SO S64,ooo Equipmtnt/Other $0 $0 $0 SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 SO S8/J(} ,000 Potential Funding Sources: SQ A combination of unobligated monics from a variety of funds, dcvdopment impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction or JOIIlC projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. t (cj r ... ~ r.- .. ~ t I ; i I . I ~ I t . I E I I I I · E (c) City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgrtU1J: Circulation (Streets. Signals and Bridges) System ProJect Title: Mount Vernon Bridge Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-19 ProJoct Description: Widen the Mt. Vernon Bridge 10 four lanes. All of the proposed additionalmajar rood seJ!ll1Ol1ll ccmIained in ST~l1 through ST-36 will represent. mere 6.411> of the toto! 735.21 .t General Plan build-out while the existing community Iw generated 92.611> (688.32 DlDes) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/lOils testing and project administration costs bave been included at IS" of construction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. Ju8tificationlRoquiremeDt for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will auiIt in a<c:ommodating the nearly 5811> incr.... in dally trip-DlDes at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they bave previously been able to use but now rind at maximum carrying capacity. The City can. expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roui!h1y 7,973.974 dally trip-DlDes, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip DlDes. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration i5 absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Pr~;cct: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic now at the intersections of streeta with bridges to Level E or F by acting us a bottleneck. Level "E" i5 "Unstable Row" and ia identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditiODl, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent wi~ the City's Circulation Element. ProJect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this cuneot effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/0-11 ToW PROPOSED 2~7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out y..... Design/lnspection/ Adl1Jinjstralion $0 $0 $0 $0 $384.000 $384.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ConstructioJJ $0 $0 $0 $0 $2.560.000 $2.560,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $256,000 $256,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3.200.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. . 1i0 The construction or some ""' I lit t , t ~ t I I I I ~ e t I I I E I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Proj<<t Title: Mountain View, Thompson to Electric Program: CircuWion (S_. SigDIIllI1d Bridles) Sylilem Submming DeputmCDt(S): Development Services Department (Enlincerinll Proj<<t No.: ST-20 Proj<<t Description: Widen Mountain View Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Thompson. P1ace to Electric Avenue adding approximatcJy O.41ane mila of arterial/eollcctor to the City'. existinl inventory of 688.32 llll1C miles. All of the proposed additioDO! major rood IClmcnll coatalncd in ST -01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.411 of the toial 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existinl commuoity has I~atcd 92.611 (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project: administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustificationlRcguiremCDt for Proj<<t: Tbia aec:tion of "major" roodway (arterial or collector) i. required to complete the Gcnerol Plan Circulation Syllcm II1d will auiat in accommodating the nesrly 5811 inc..... in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out reaullin8 from new development. This ICplCIll of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to UIC but now rmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additioDO! 5711 inc..... in the number of dally trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 dally trip-miles to roushly 7,973.974 dally trip-miles, an inc..... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles, There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing coUectoralarterials. Conscguences of Not Compicdng Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level Ear F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and iI identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not 8 component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20io-ll Tor.} PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-D8 2008-(}9 2009-iO through .n EXPENDiTURES Build-out y.... Design/Inspection! Admbtistration $0 $0 SO SO S76,800 S76.800 Lond Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 Construction SO $0 $0 SO S512.ooo S512.OOO Contingency SO $0 SO SO S51.2oo S51.2oo Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 TOT Ai.. COST $0 $0 SO $0 S64O,OOO S64O.ooo Potentia) Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monics from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 61 The construction of some .'.:~:;:;:;: (e) ,~_:.::::::::.;":";~,__::.::<~rx?':;:. .... .. E I I E ~ I I I I E I I I I I \ I I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Mountain View Bridge at Mission Creek ProgtallJ: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridles) System Submitting DeputmODt(.): Development Services Department (Enlin..rinl) Project No.: ST-21 Pro.i<<t Description: Widen the Mountain View Bridge at the Mission Creek Channel. The project conJists of widening the roadway and shoulden. All of the proposed additional major ra&d ..gments contained in ST-01 through ST-36 will represent I mcre 6.4'1 of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the eJtistinl eommunity has geoerated 92.6'1 (618.32 miles) of the major ra&d miles. Engineering plan cheek. inspection, materials/solls tcsting and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of CODJtruction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. JustiliClllionlRequirelllont for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will usia in accommodating the nearly S811 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This ICgment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capac:ity. The City can expect: an additional 51 Wa increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973.974 daily trip-miles, an ine..... of 2,923,685 daily trip mil... There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signalJ where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Urmable Flow. and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City:s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the '"Build-out" column. 20JO-ll TouJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out y..,.. Design/Inspection/ AdnUJJjsuaUon SO $0 SO $0 $138,240 $138,240 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 $0 $0 SO SO Construction SO SO $0 SO $921. 600 $921,600 Contingency SO SO' SO $0 $92,160 $92.160 Equipment/Other $0 SO SO $0 $0 SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 $1,152,000 $1.152.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 62 The construction of some (,j ~. P'" ~ I E I I E I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Prognm: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) Systcm Project Title: Mountain View. Rivcrview to Central SubJDirrillg DcpartJDcn/(s): Developm.nt Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-22 proj.c1 Description: Construct Mountain View Avenue from Riverview Drive to Central Avenue adding approximately O.S lane miles of artcrialIcollo:tor to the City'. .xisting inventory of 688.321an. miles. All ofth. proposed additional major road scgmants contAined in ST-oI through ST-36 will r.pr...nt a m.r. 6.4'11 of th.tota! 735,21 at Gen.ral Plan build-out whil. the .xisting .ommunity has generated 92.6'11 (688.32 miles) ofth. major road milcs. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/lOils testingllJld project administration costs have been induded at 15C1 of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction COlts. Jusrilication/Rcquirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assilt in accommodating the nearly S8 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-mil.s from the curren' 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be construCted (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials, Consequences of Not Completing PrCJ.icct: Failure or inability to widen streetS, construct bridge widths and install signals where wananted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic: flow at the interiCCtions of streetS with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck, Level "EIo is "Unstable Flow" and iI identified as Nlong queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions. back.-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference DocUllJMt: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20Jo-ll Total PROPOSED 200~7 2007-()8 200S-09 2009-JO through all EXPEND/TURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ AdmbJistration $0 SO SO SO $829,440 S829,44O Land Acquisition/Right of ",ay SO SO SO $0 SO $0 COIJstruction $0 $0 SO $0 ' S5.529,6OO S5,529,6OO Contingency SO $0 SO SO S552 ,960 S552,960 Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 SO S6,912,000 S6,912,ooo Potential Fundin~ Sources: r::' A combmatlon of unobligated momes from a vanet}' of funds, development impact fecs, and specific: agreements. The c.onstruc.tion ~( some projects listed may be required as a condilion of approval. for which a credit would be received. (e) .. .-- - ,.,." .-.,.211l1:':--'" ~ Ii. t I I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I I I I ! i I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Cir<:u1ation (Streets, Signal. lUld Bridg..) Sy...m Project Title: Mountain View, 1-10 to San Bernardino Ave. Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-23 Project Description: Widen Mountain View Avenue from two llUl.. to four Iancs from the 1-10 to SlUl Bernardino Avenue adding approllimslcly 0.141lUle mil.. of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 68g. 32 lane mil... All of the proposed additional major road "gments cont&incd in ST-ol through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4'11 of the lotAl135,21 at General PllUl build-out while the existing community has gcncratcd 92.6'11 (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspcc:tion. materials/soils testing and project administration COlts have been included at 15~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10~ of construction costs. Justifit:IJtion/Rcquiremcnt for Project: This section of Hmajor" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assiJt in accommodating the nearly S811 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segmcot of roadway will provide an alternative Cor drivers who have been displ~ from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the Dumber of daily trip-mile. from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-mil.. to roughly 1,913,914 dally trip-mile., lUl incr.... of 2,923,6g5 dally trip mil... There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additionallanc miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: FaUure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the interscetions of streets with bridges to Lev~ E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstrca.m of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditiol1l. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "BuUd-out" column. 2010-11 TotIJ! PROPOSED 2006-07 2oo7-og 2oog-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $144.000 $144,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 ' $960,000 $960,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $96.000 $96,000 Equipm~t/Othcr $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.200.000 $1,200,000 Potential Fundinp Sources: A combmahon of unobhgated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific li)!rCCmcnts. projects listed may be requtred as a condttlon 01 approval, for which a credit would be received. 64 The construction of some (e) -.y. II"' .. .. Ii. ~ E E I I I I . I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Mountain View Avenue Railroad Grade Crossing PrognuD: Circulation (StrootI, Signal. snd Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Ptojoct No.: ST-24 Project DoscriptiOll: Widen the Mountain View Railway Grade Crossing (rom 1.500 feet north of the railway grade crouing from one lane North and South to two lsnes North snd South. All of the proposed additions! major rold ICgmcnll contained in ST-01 through ST-36 will rcproscnta more 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General PlIO build-oUI while the existing commUDity baa generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major rold All of the proposed additional major road 'egment' contained in ST-ol through ST-36 will reprOlClJl a mere 6.4'11 of the tota1 735.21 at Gcoera1 PlIO build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road mUcs. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency hu been included at 10% of construction costs. JustilicationlReqWrcmCllt for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 5811 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out rclulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57~ increase in the number of dally trip-mUes from the current 5.050,289 dally trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 dally trip-miles. 10 increase of 2.923.685 dally trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane mil" can be constructed (46.8 additiona11anc mil"), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow. and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". ReferMce Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not 8 component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201D-ll TottJ/ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-1)9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO SO SO S28,8OO S28.8OO LlllJd Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO I S192,000 S192.ooo Contingency SO SO SO SO S19,2OO S19,2oo Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S24O,000 S24O.OOO I Potential FUJlding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific ag.reements. The construction601- some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. I. (,j . .....,.. ~ - ill ,. t. E t . .. I I I E I I . I I I I I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Palm, Cajon to 1-2l5 SB Ramp Program: Circulalion (Strecla. Signals and Bridges) SySlCm Submmblg DcpartmMt(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projt:ct No.: ST-2S Pr~jcc' Description: Widen Palm Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Cajon Boulevard to the 1-215 Southbound acccsslegrcu ramp. adding approximately 0.5 lane miles of ancrial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.321anc miles. All ofthc proposed additional major road seg_ contained in ST-oI through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4'11; ofthc total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the CJtisting community bas 8enerated 92.6'11; (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. En8ineering plan cbeck, inspection, materials/soils testin8 an4 project adminislralion costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at lO~ of construction costs. JustjliCII.rion/Rcquircment for P~ject: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S811 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This ICgment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been .ble to use but now find at DWtimum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57'11; increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. Tbcrc are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additionallanc miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely nceessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collcetorslarterials. Consequences of Not Completing Proiect: -Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and. needed would reduce the Level of Servic:e (LOS) traffic flow at the interscc:tions of sueets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and it identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-Ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort:. Thcrefme 111 projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JQ-lJ Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-09 2009- 10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years f)csign/Inspection! AdmjnjstraUon $0 $0 $0 $0 $91.200 $91.200 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $608,000 $608,000 COlltiJJgency $0 $0 $0 $0 $60 ,800 $60,800 Equipment/Other $0 SO $0 $0 $0 SO TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $760,000 $760.000 Potential FundiJJs Sources: A combination of unobligated moniel from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. The construction ~p some (.) .....".-.:;...> \ I I ... .. ,. L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (el City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Pin.. Kendell to Belmont Program: Circu1alion (S_, Signala and Bridges) SylleJll Submitting DopartmcDt(.): Development Scrvic:c& Dcpsnment (Engineering) Project No.: ST-26 Projoct Description: Widen Pine Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Kendall Drive to Belmont Avenue adding approximately O.S lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's .xisting inventory of 688.32 I... miles. All of the proposccI additional major road ..gm.... con/ained in ST ~I through ST-36 will r.pr....t a m.r. 6.4l1\ of the total 735,21 at Gcn.rel P1an build-out wbil. the .xisting community has gcncratcd 92.6l1\ (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan chec:k. inspection, materials/soUs testing and project administration eo-. have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of consuudion costs. JustifleadonlRcquireJJJenr for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the Gcncral Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8 ~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment: of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum. carrying capacity. The City can expect: an additional 57 ~ increase in the Dumber of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles. .. incrcuc of 2,923,685 daily trip miles, Tbcrc ar.limits.. to how ....y additionoll... miles can be COllltruc:tcd (46,8 additional1cnc miles), thua optimum 1... mil. configunlion is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequ""c.. of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues ofvchicles waiting upstream. of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20lD-ll TotsJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009- lO through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Years DOli 'lnspccUonI AdllJinjltUtion $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,000 $96,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $640.000 $640,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $64.000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 ,000 $800,000 PotenticJ Fundillg Soore..: 67 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development: impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. -- lit E I I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I Ii (c) City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: Perris Hill Park Road, 21 It to Pacific Program: Circulation (Streets, Signa1J and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Developm..t Services Departm..t (Engineering) Project No.: ST-27 Pro,ject DescriptiOlt: Widen Perris Hill Park Road from two lanes to four lanes from 21st Street to Pacific Street adding approximately 0.8 lane mila of arterial/collector to the City', exiating inv..tory of 688.321ane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments eonWned in ST-oI through 5T-36 will repr....t a mere 6.4'11 of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6'11 (688.32 mil..) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inJpection, materiallisoila testing and project administration coata bave been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. JustmationlRequirement for Project: This sec:tion of "major" roadway (arterial or collC(:tor) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will auilt in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This acgmcnt of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been diJplaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at nUllti","m carrying capacitY.. The City can e>pect an additional 57'11 increase in the number of daily lTip-mile, from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-mil.. to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constrUcted (46.8 additiona11anc miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Conscqucncos of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow. and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed coJ\ditions, bac:k-upI from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that afC consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Tjmjng: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "'Build-out" column. 20/Q-ll Toul PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-1)9 2009-/0 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out y..,. Design/lnspection/ Admbzistration SO $0 $0 SO S153,600 SI53,600 LIJJJd Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction SO $0 $0 SO SI,024,ooo SI,024,ooo Contingency $0 $0 $0 SO SI02,400 SI02,400 Equipment/Other SO $0 $0 $0 SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 S1.280.OOO SI,280,ooo Pot..o.J Funding Sources; A combination of unobligated monies from 8 variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 68 The construction of some ... . lilt t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I I I I I I I I I I I I II........ , I , I i I I I I (0) P~;ecr Tid.: Rancho. Colton City Limits to 5th Progt8l1l: Circulation (Streets. Signal, and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Depanment (Engineering) Projoct No.: ST-28 Project De&criptjon: Widen Rancho Avenue (rom two lanes to four lanes from the Colton City Limitl to 5th Street adding approximately 1.4 lane mil.. of arterial/oollector to the City', .xisting inventory of 688.32 Ian. mil... All of the proposod additionol major road segments cnntoi.... in ST-oI through ST-36 will represent a mer. 6.4')1; of the toiaI 735,21 at General Plan build-out whil. th..ltisting community has generated 92.6')1; (688.32 mil..) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inapec:lion, materials/soli, toating and project administration eolla have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Pr~;cct: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will usist in accommodating the nearly 58')1; increase in dally trip-mIl.. at Genera\ Plan builcl-out RAWting from new development. Thia aegmenl of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fU1d at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 5711 increase in the number of daily trip-mile. from the current 5,050,289 dally trip-mil., to roughly 7,973.974 dally trip-miles, an incr.... of 2.923,685 dally trip mil... There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles). thus optimum lane mile c:onfiguration is absolutely nec:essary to c:omplcmcnt the existing 668 lane miles of existing c:ollec:torslarterws. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Servic:c (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by ac:ling as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forc:ed Flow" creates "Jammed conditiona, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movementH. Rcf~rence Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City.'s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projocts default to the "8uild-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-D9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! AdJDinjstn.tion $0 $0 $0 $0 $268,800 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.792,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $179,200 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,240,000 ToUl B1l y..... $268,800 $0 $1.792.000 $2.240.000 h~~~~~: M A combination of unobH'gatcd monies from 8 variety of funds. development impact fccs. and specific agreements. Thc"Iw'"Onstluction 01 some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. .. .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail P"!i<<I Title: Rialto. Sierra to Waterman Program: Circu1ation (S_. Siglllll and Bridges) System Submitting Dcportmcnt(I): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-29 Project Description: Widen Rialto Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Sierra Way to Waterman Avenue adding approximately 1.0 lane mile of arterial/collector to the City' 5 existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed. additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% aCthe total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.611 (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan che<:k. inspection. materials/soils tClting and project administration COIlS have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustifiClltion/RcqWrc11Jent for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 ~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050.289 dlily trip-miles to roughly 7.973.974 dsily trip-miles. an increase of 2.923.685 dsily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuralion is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and iI identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project: timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20Jo-JI TotoJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-JO through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Dcsign/lnspel/;tionl Ad1IJjnjstration $0 $0 $0 $0 SI92.000 $192.000 Land Acquisition/Risht of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO SI.280.000 $1.280.000 Contingency SO SO $0 $0 $128.000 $128.000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 $0 SO $1.600,000 $1.600.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as II. condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 70 The construction of some (e) .-. ......".... -.,. ZJO&' . "" I. . I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro.;OC' Till.: Rialto, Lena to Tippecanoe Prognm: Circulation (Slreeb, Sipals and Bridges) System Suhmirring DepartmOll'(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No,: ST-30 Prop' Description: Widen Rialto Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Lena Road to Tippecanoe Avenue adding approltimately 1.5 lane miles of artcrial/collcetor to the City', existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments ("ttnt.i.-4 in 51-01 through ST-36 will ropr.....' a m.re 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing commUllity has gcoerated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inapection, materials/soUstosting and project administration c:osU hay. been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Pro.iect: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segmad of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying eapacity. The City can expect. an additional 574l increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to bow many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional1ane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the eWting 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and instal1signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow a' the intersections of str.... with bridges to ....el E or F by acting as a bottl.neck. .....1 "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/0-11 Tor./ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008_ 2009-/0 /hrough aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out y..... Design/Inspection! AdmirUstration SO SO SO SO S288 ,000 $288,000 Land Acquisition/Righ' of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO C OJlstruction SO SO SO SO S1.920,ooo S1.920,ooo Contingency SO SO SO SO S192,ooo S192,ooo Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2.4oo,ooo S2,400,OOO Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monics from a variety of funds, development impact fccs, and specific agreements. The construction 7ollOme projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. to) -..,.2!lIl6.... ... I. E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Progrom: Circulalion (StrcclI, Sip.ols and Bridges) System Pr~joct Title: SlAIe Street, 16th to Foothill Submming Depsrtment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projeet No.: ST-31 Projeet Description: Construct two lanes of roadway along State Street from 16th Street to Foothill Boulevard. The project will connect State Street to Rancho Avenue (new road). The project would be undertaken in four phases. All of the proposed odditionlll major road seglllClllS containccl in ST-oI through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4" of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6" (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan cheek, inspec:lion, materials/soUs testing and project administration COIlS bave been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Pro.;ect: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is requirccl to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will usisl in accommodating the nearly 58" incr.... in daily trip-miles at Gcneral Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative (or drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fllld at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. Tbere arc limits as to how many additionallanc miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane mUes), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, c:onstruct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduc:c the Level of Service (LOS) traffic: flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottlenec:k. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehic:les waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forc:ed Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" coluDUl. 2010-11 TotJJl PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-<J9 2009- 1 0 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Yean Dcsign/Insp"tionl Adminjstratjon SO $0 SO SO S888 ,000 S888,OOO i Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO $0 $0 I C,Jllstruction $0 SO SO SO I S5.920.000 S5,920,OOO i Contingency SO $0 SO SO i S592.000 S592,OOO Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO $0 S7,4oo,OOO $7,400,000 Potentia) Fundinp Sources: A ":0mbUlation 01 unobligated momes from a vanety of iunds, development impact fees, and specific a~reements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would he received. 72 The construction of some L (c) .'-.y.-.':".. . .. II. I I I I I s I I I I I I I I I I I i City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projoct Title: State Street. FoothW to 1-215 Program: Circulation (StredI, Sipa1s ond Bridges) Sy_ Projoct No.: ST-32 Submilling Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project Description: Widen State Street from two lanes to four lanes from FoothW Boulevard 10 the 1-215. adding opproxiDtale1y 8.0 lonc miles of artcrialIcoUeetor to the City's existing invenlOry of 688.321one miles. All of the proposed adclitioa.a1 major road segmcnta contained in ST~I through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4'11 of the total 735,21 at General PIon build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6'11 (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan cheek,. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at IS'" of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Prq.icct: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist ill accommodating the nearly 58'11 increase in daily trip-mil.. at General PIon build-out rcaulling from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City con expcclon additional 57'11 inerease in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-mil.. 10 roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, on increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additionallanc miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Nor Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottlcncc:k. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified 85 "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditioDl, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JD--ll ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2oo8~ 2009-JO through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Desigll/Inspection! Administration SO $0 $0 $0 $960.000 $960,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO COllsrructio/J $0 , $0 $0 $0 $6.400.000 $6.400.000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 i $0 $640.000 $640.000 Equipment/Other $0 SO $0 $0 $0 SO TOTAL COST $0 SO $0 $0 $8.000.000 $8,000,000 Potentia] Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from Ii variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction JJ some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which Ii credit would be received. (0) ....,..21106. .. , .. I , I I I s I I I . I , I I E I ' I ; . I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projoct Title: Tippecanoe. Milito Harriman Program: Circulation (StredI. Sigaols and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Dopartment (Engineering) Projoct No.: 5T-33 Projoct Description: Widen Tippoeanoo from four lanes to six lanes from Mill Strccl to Harriman adding approl<imalely 3.5 lane miles of artcria11coUcctor to the City's e.isting inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the propoacd additional major road scgmenta contained in ST-OI through ST-36 will represent. mere 6.4\1\ of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 92.6\11 (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soUs testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustiJicationlRequirament for Projoct: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the ...rly 58 \1\ incr.... in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. Tbia ICgmcm of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S7~ incrcuc in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 1,913.914 daily trip-miloa, an incr.... of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. Thera arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration iJ absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Compieting Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and install signals where wananted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and iI identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow", creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City.'s Circulation Element. Project Tinting' Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToW PROPOSED 2()()6-o7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDlTURES Build-out Y cars Design/lnspection/ Ad11Jinistntion SO SO $0 $0 S612.OOO $612.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Wax SO SO $0 SO $0 SO Construction $0 SO SO SO $4,480,000 $4.480,000 Contingency SO SO SO SO $448.000 $448.000 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S5,600.ooo SS .600.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combmation of unobh~atcd monics from a variety of funds, development impact fccs, and spectfic agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 74 T he construction of some (,) ~.-. .. . '" .. E .. I I I I I I I I ; I I I i I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: University Parkway, Hallmark to BNSF Grade Separation Program: Circulation (Stroets. Sil!Jll!s and Bridges) System Submitting Deparrmenr(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projcet No.: ST-34 Project Description: Widen University Parkway from two lanes to four lanes from Hallmark Parkway to the BNSF Grade Separation adding approximately 0.7S lane miles of arterial/collector to the City' 5 existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segmentl contained in 51-01 through 51-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10~ of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for ~;ect: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in aecomm~g the nearly 5811 increase in daily trip-miles at GcneraI Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles. an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additionallanc miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the exiJting 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Nor Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JQ-ll ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-Q8 2008-09 2009- JO through all EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO SI44,OOO SI44.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO $0 ' $960,000 S960.000 Contingency SO SO SO SO S96.000 S96,000 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S1.2oo,000 SI.2oo.000 Potentja) Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monics from a variety. of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. t (,j 7S The construction of some .. . t E I' I I I I I I I E I I I I I I [ City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail 1'1ogtaIIJ: Circulation (5_, Signals ...d Bridges) System Project Title: Waterman, SIb to Baseline Submitting Depturmt:nt(s): Deveiopment Services Department (Engineering) Project No,: ST-35 Pro,;oet Description: Widen Waterman Avenue from four lanes to six lanes from Sth Street to Baseline Street adding approximately 3.6 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688,321...e miles, All of the proposed additional major road scgll10llls conWned in ST-01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General PI... buUd-out while the existing community has g...eratod 92,6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soUs telling and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10~ of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation"System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % inercssc in dally trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development, This sc8ll1Oll' of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been disp1ac:ed from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect. an additional 57'1 increase in the number of daily trip-mUes from the current 5,050,289 daUy trip-miles 10 roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-miles, ... increasc of 2,923,685 dally trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Prq;ect: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" ud is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditiODl. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City' s Circulation Element. Projt:<r Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects dcfault to the "Build-out" column. 20]1>-I/ Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2oo7-(}8 2008-09 2009-10 througb .0 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO SO SO S691,2OO S691.200 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO 54,608,000 54,608,000 Contingency SO SO SO SO 5460,800 $460,800 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S5,760,ooo S5,760,OOO Potential FWlding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a varicty of funds. dcvelopment impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction ~p some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. I (oj ~.-....,.,. .. . "'" l. ,. Iii I I I I I I I I I E I I I E I I I E [ (ej City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro.i<<t Title: Vidoria. Richardson to Mountain View PrognutJ: Circu1alion (S_. SilJWI and Bridges) System Submitting Dcparrment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projoct No.: ST-36 Project Description: Widen Victoria Avenue and make various improvemenll from Richardson to Mountain View. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have bccn included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been. included at lOll of construction costs. All of the proposed additional major road segments eoatained in ST-ol through 51-36 will reprcacnt a mere 6.411 of the total 735.21 It General Plan build-out while the existing community has generlted 92.6" (688.32 miles) of the major roed miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soUs testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in ac;commodating the nearly 58 ~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide all alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There ore limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic fiow at the intersectionl of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced FlowM creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistcnt with thc City's Circulation Element. Prqiect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the MBuild-out" column. 2010-11 ToUJ PROPOSED 2006-<J7 2007-<J8 2008-<J9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ Administrwon $0 SO $0 SO S24.ooo S24.ooo Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO S16O.ooo S16O.OOO Con/ingMCY $0 $0 SO SO S 16.000 S16.ooo Equipment/Other SO $0 SO $0 SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 SO S200,000 5200,000 Potential Funding SourcGS: A combination of unobligated monlCl from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projccts listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 77 The construction of some ... .. ... t" .. ... .. I I I I I I I t I E 5 I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ Little League Drive and 1-215 Frontage Prognm: Circulation (StrccU, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting DcporrmMt(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-37 Pro}..t Description: Construct 8 traffic signal at the intersection of Little League Drive and 1-215 Frontage Road. This signal, when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at Gcnerol Plan build-out. All of the proposeclsignal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at Gcncrol Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8l1 (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. matcrialallOils telting and project IlhniniVration COllI have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustifiClltionlRequirem~t for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58" incr.... in daily trip-miles at Gencrol Plan build-out resulting from new development. This acgment of roadway will provide an oltcmalivc for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now rand at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect: an additional 57" increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973.974 daily trip-miles. an increase .of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. ConscqUMCCS of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signal. where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic now at the intersections of s1rccla with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates .. Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/D-ll Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 SO SO SO S24.ooo S24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO SO $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 SO SO SO $160,000 SI60,OOO Contingency SO SO SO SO S16.OOO S16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2OO,OOO S2OO,OOO I Potential Funding Sources: - A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction ~~ some projects listed may be r~uircd as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. ; (c) ,,~,-,.. """. ill l'" ;. ; .. I I I I I ~ I r. Ii I I E I I I I I , City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffi. Sip @ Litl1e League Drive and llelmont Progruz: Cireulation (StredI. Signals and Bridges) Syllem Project No.: ST-38 Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project Deseription: Construct a tramc: signal at the intersection of Little League Drive and Belmont Avenue. This lignal, when developed, will be one of 48 new sips and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General PIon buUd-out. All or the proposed sip proje<:ls eontained in ST-37lhrough ST-84 will ..present a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General PIon buUd-out whUe!he existing community has generated 83.8l1 (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan .hcclt. inapection. materials/aoUs teslin8 and project adminiJlralion costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for ~ject: This intersection needs to be signalized to .omplete the General Plan Cir.uIation Syllem and will _is! in accommodating !he nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This "pent of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in !he number of daily trip-miles from the .urrcat 5.0SO.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an in....... of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. The.. ..elimits as to how many additional I... miles can be constructed, thus optimum trafne signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequ""... of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvchiclcs waiting upstream aCthe intersection", Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City' 5 Circulation Element. ProJect TiIning: Projeet timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-(}8 2008-D9 2009- 10 through 011 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO $0 SO S24.ooo S24,ooo Land A.quisition/Right of Way SO SO SO $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO S16O.ooo S16O.ooo Contingency SO $0 $0 SO S16,ooo SI6,ooo Equipment/Other $0 SO $0 SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 SO SO SO S2OO,OOO S2OO,OOO . Potential Funding Sources: 1 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction7~ some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (c) .,....,.. pi .. t ;: [ E E , I ; E I t ; E I E I E i E I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Palm and Cajon Program: Circulation (Streets. Sipals and Bridg..) Syllcm Submitting Deparrmcnt(.): Development Servic:.. Deportment (Engineering) Project No.: ST-39 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Cajon Boulevard. This .ignal. when developed. will be one of 48 new lipals and will repr....t 16.2% of the City's total 297 sipals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed aipal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 aignalsat General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan cheek. inlpeetion. materialallOils teating and project admini5tration COltS have_ included at 1511 of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Pro}ect: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly sail increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widcned. that they have previously been able to use but now flAd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-mil.. from the currcDt 5.050.289 daUy trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daUy trip mil... There are limits.. to how many additional I... miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to mB'I';_m;7~ the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and iI1sta11 signals where warranted and needed would reduce the level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection", Level F, "Forced Row" creates "Jammed conditiolLl, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore.n projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JD-J/ Total PROpOSED 2006-07 2007-<JB 200B-<J9 2009-JO through oJ) EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Deaignllnspectionl Administration SO SO SO SO S24,000 S24,OOO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO COlJstrucfion SO SO SO SO S16O,000 S16O,000 COlJtingency SO SO SO SO S16,000 SI6.000 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2OO,OOO S2oo.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction ~Psome projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (e) ... III t [ t t [ I I t I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tit/e: Traffic Signal @ Pllm ond Industrial Propm: Circu1ation (Strccls, Signals ond Bridges) Sysrem Submitting DcpMrment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -40 Project Description: Co~struct a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Indultrial Parkway_ This signal. when developed, will be one of 48 new signlls ond will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 sips at Gcnerol Plan build-out. All of the propoacd signal prop c:ontaincd in 5T-37 through 5T-84 will r.prClCllt a only 16.2% of the total 297 sips at Gcncrol Pion build-out while the ..iatiDg commllllily bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils tcsting and project .dminiltration cost:I have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58. increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out :resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alterDatiVe for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, on iner.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how monyaddilioDa11ane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely nocessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.2lane miles of existing collector/arterW roads. Consequences of Nor Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Serviee (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates." Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City:s Circulation Element. Project Timing' Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Toul PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Dcsign/lnspccrjon/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,400 $14,400 Lwd Acquisition/Right of ",aX $0 $0 $0 $0 ; $0 $0 COJlStruction $0 $0 $0 I $0 ~ $96,000 $96,000 C untingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,600 $9,600 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 1_", Potential Funding Sources: A ';0mbi.nal1on ul unobh~ated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific a~rccmcnts. The construction ~l some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. ; W ~~ ,. .. , E E , E I I I I I E I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: TrlfflC Signal @ Palm and 1-215 ramps Progrom: Circulation (Str..... Signals and Bridges) System Submitting DepartmM/(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-4l Projoc/ Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and [-215 Ramps. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2 % of the City's total 297 signalsat General Plan bulld-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST - 37 through ST-84 will rcpr....t. only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at Gcacral Plan bulld-out while the eltisling eOlDlllunily has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soill testing and projcet administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10~ of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in acc:ommodating the nearly 58 ~ incr.... in daily trip-miles It Gcacral Plan bulld-out resulting from new development. Thia segment of roadw.y will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displlced from roadwlY segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% incr.... in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There arc limits IS to how many additional lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan muimwn 73S.21anc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. ConscqlJenccs of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Uftltable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010 11 TouJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2oo8-(}9 2009-10 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out YOMS Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S39,6OO S39,6OO I Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO I SO $0 $0 $0 C Ollstruction $0 SO SO $0 . $264,000 S264,000 Contingency SO $0 SO SO S26,4OO S26,4OO Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S330,000 S330,000 Potentia} Fundinf! Sources: ! A comblflatlon of unobligated monies from a ....anet)' of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be requtred as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 82 The construction of some (0) ~.-' !II: lit I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Progrtun: Circulation (Streets, Sipals and Bridges) System Project Title: Traffic Signa1 @ Palm and Irvington Submitting DepartmOllt(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-42 Prqject Description: ConstruCt a traffic signa1 at the intersection of Palm AvOll.. and Irvington AvOll... This sipal. whan developed. will be OlIO of 48 - sipals and will reprcsentI6.2'11 of the City's total 297 signa1s at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed sipal projects contained in ST-37 through ST -84 will repr....t a only 16.2'11 of the total 297 signa1..t General Plan build-out while the existing community has ganerated 83.8'11 (249 signals) of thetotalsigna1s. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soil. _g and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10~ of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Projoct: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will usist in accommodating the nearly 58 iI increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S71i increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-mile. to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how manyadditioa.allane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.2lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service. (LOS) traffic flow at the inlcrseclions of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified .s "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2oo6-{)7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Years Design/Inspection/ AdmitJjstration SO SO SO SO S18,000 S18,000 LaJJd Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Constructjon SO SO SO SO S120.ooo S120.ooo Contingency SO SO SO SO S12.ooo S12.ooo Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S150.ooo $150,000 Potentja] Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated mORles from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction 80f some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. I (oj . . .'-'It. _,L,..,., .".,., t I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I i I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streeta, SiBJWs and Bridges) Syllem Project Tjd.: TraffIC Signal @ Palm and Belmont Submltblg DepartmeJIt(.): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-43 l'n!;cct Descrjptk>n: .. Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Belmont Avenue. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City'stotal 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects conWned in ST-37 through ST -84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas gcncratcd 83.8'11 (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soUs testing and project administration COllI bave ~ included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. Justmeauon/ReqWrement for Prq,ject: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 ~ increase in dally trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S7~ increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-mile. to roughly 7.973,974 dally trip-miles, an increa.. of2,923,68S dally trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely ncccssary to ma.w;rni7f'! the General Plan maximum 735.21anc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. ConscqueJIccs of Not Completing l'n!;ect: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Serviu (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from. other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference DOCULDt:l2t: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pr~;ect TiI1Ung: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projcc:ts default to the "Build-out" coluDUl. 201G-ll Totol PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out y...,., Design/lnspectionl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24.000 Land AcqujsjtjonlRight of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potentia) Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific a.greements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 84 The construction of some (0) 'ro"''''l'.2liil6'.''''' l'" lr. t I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I, I I. (e) City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tjde: Traffic Signal @Campus Parkway (Pepper-Linden) and Industrial Prognm: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) Syllem Suhmirting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -44 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Campus Parkway and Industrail Parkway. ThiJ lignal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan bulld-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 wlll represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan bulld-out while the exilting community bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan cheek, inspection, materials/solls testing and project adminillralion COIlS have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10~ of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Pr~;ccr: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. Thi5 ICgmCJlt of roadway will provide an altemative for drivers who have been displaecd from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but DOW rmd at msximum carrying c:apacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-mlles from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increaseof2,923,685 daily trip mlles. There ore limits as to how many adclitional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to m&..T;mh.. the General Plan maximum 73S.2lanc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing P~jcct: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic now at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified 8S "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City' 5 Circulation Element. Project nnting: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "BuUd-out" column. 2010-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-<J9 2009-/0 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! AdllUnistrsdon SO SO SO SO S24,000 S24.OOO LsmJ AetjuUjUon/Rjght of W.y SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO S16O,000 SI6O,ooo Contingency SO SO $0 SO S16,000 S16,000 EquipmmtlOther $0 $0 SO SO $0 SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S200,OOO S200,ooo PotcnUal FUlJdwg 50urees: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. developmem impact fees. and specific agreements-. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for whi~h a credit would be received. 85 The construction of some t E I I' I I I I I I I I . I I I , I I I E (el City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Program: Traffic SigDal @ Campus Parkway (Pepper-Linden) and 1-215 Ramps Circulation (Streets, Sipa1s and Bridges) System Submittillg Deperrmea/(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-45 Pro.iCCl Ikscription: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Campus Parkway and 1-215 Ramps. This signal. wben developed, will be one of 48 new lignals and will reprcsentI6.2" of the City'stoul297 sipa1s at General Plan build-out. All of the propoacd signal projects c:ontained in ST-37 through ST -84 will represent a only 16.2" of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8" (249 signals) of thetoulsignals. Engineering plan check, inapectioo, materials/soils _g and project administration costa bave been included at lSlJ of construction costs and contingency has been included at lOll of construction costs. Justilic.ationIRcquiremeD.t for Project: This intersection needs '0 be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58" increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide aD. alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at llIlIXimum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57" increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles.o roughly 7,973,974 deily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how manyaddilionallane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is ablOlutely neceuary to mBY;.n;7P. the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of ex.isting collcetor/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection-. Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". RcferMce DocUlIJt:Ilt: Stafr cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201D-n PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 2008-(}9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out DesignllnspectionlAdministntion SO SO SO SO $42,000 L4nd Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO S280.000 Contingency SO SO SO SO S28,000 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S350,000 Total all Years S28,OOO SO S350,OOO Potential Fundillg Sources, A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 86 The construction of some t c I r E E E I I E I I I I E I I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Progrom: Circ_ (StreclS, SigIIIIs and Bridges) System Project Tide: TraffIC Signal @Campus Parkway and Northpark Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -46 p,~jcct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intcrscc:tion of Campus Parkway and Northpark Boulevard. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and wUl represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan buUd-out. All of the proposed signal projects c:ontaIncd in S1-37 through 51-84 wUl rcpresenta only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan buUd-out while the eltialing commllllily bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspec:tion, matcria1sllOUS teating and project adminiIlration colli have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 5811 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alterutive for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the oumber of dally trip-mUes from the cuneul 5,050,219 dally trip-Pilles to roughly 7.973,974 dally trip-mUes, an increase of 2,923,685 dally trip mUes. There arc limits as to bow many additiooa! lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to m,w;mi7e the General Plan maximum 73S.2lane mUes of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Prqicct; Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck, Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection", Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document; Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Tor.} PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Years Design/Inspection! Ad_mon SO SO SO SO S24.000 S24.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO S16O,OOO SI6O,OOO Contingency SO SO SO SO S16,OOO S16,OOO Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2oo,OOO $200,000 Potentjal Funding Sources: 87 A combination of unobiigated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (e) " ill E I I I I I I I: a I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail P"!jeI:t Tid.: TraffIC Signal @ Sierra (CSUSB) and Northpark Prognm: Circulation (S_. Signals and Bridges) SyllCJll Submitting Department(.): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-47 Project Description: Construct a traffic signa1 at the intencction of Sierra (CSUSB) and Northpark Boulevard. This lignal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signsls and will rcpr....t 16.2 % of the City' slota! 297 lignals at Genersl Plan build-out. All of the proposed lignal projccll contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the tota!297 oignals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the totsl signsls. Engineering plan check, in5pac:tion, -.rials/soils testing and project adminiatration co... have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffie !low at the intersections of _ with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "UnstIble Flow" and i" identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditiona, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 ~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out fCSulting (rom new development. ThiJ segment of roadway will provide an a1temative (or drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additionslS7% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the currcnlS,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lanc miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.21anc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-D8 200S-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration 50 50 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160.000 Contingoncy $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO $0 $200,000 S2OO.000 Potential Funding Sources: 88 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. II" .. t I I ! i I I I I E I I I I I E I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: TraffIC Signal @ K...daIl and 48th ProgRl1J: Circulation (Srroers, Signals and Bridges) Sy_ Su~mitting Deportment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Pro,ject No.: ST-48 Project Description: Construct 8 traffic: signal at the intersection of Kendall Drive and 48th Street. This signal. when developed,. will be one of 48 new .ignals and will r.pr.....' 16.2% of the City'statal 297 lignolu' Genersl PIan build-out. All of the proposod signal projects contained in ST -37 through ST -84 will r.pr...nts only 16.2% of the total 297 signalut Gen.rs1 Plan build-out whlle the existing community has g....rated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan cheek. inspection. materials/soil. testing and project: administration costs have been indudod at 15lk of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10~ of construction costs. Jwtifi..uon/Roquirement for Project: This int.rsection need. to b. signalized to complete the Gen.rsl Plan Circulation System and will usis! in aoeommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fInd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect: an additional 57~ increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequenceo of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottl...eck. Level "E" is "Unstabl. Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pro}ect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201D-J/ Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ Administr.tion $0 $0 $0 $0 $21.000 $21.000 Land Acquisition/Right of W.y $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $14,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 89 The construction of some ,::~:::::,'. (e) ,. ~. 3IIl6 .<... . . iIIIl ,. .. ; E E I I I I t E I E I m I I I m City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Progrom: Circu1alion (Streets, SignaIJ and Bridges) System Pro.i<<I Title: TraffIC Signal @ Lillie Mountain and 30th Submitting Dcp4rtmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-49 Pr~jccr Description: Construct a traffic signa1at the interscc:tion of Little Mountain Drive and 30th Street. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.21\; of the City's tOlll! 297 signals at General Plan buUd-out. All of the proposed signal projccls contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent 8 only 16.290 of the total 297 lignall at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.81\; (249 signals) ofthetota! signals. Engineering plan chock, inspeCtion, materials/soUs testing and project administralion costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency bas been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Pro,;ect: This intersection neads to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodatiog the nearly 58" increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an altemativc for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expoet an additional 571\; increase in the number of dally trip-mUes from the currclll 5,050,289 daily trip-mUes to roughly 7,973,974 daUy trip-mUes, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip mUes. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum tramc signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane mUes of ellisling collcc:tor/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing ProJect: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201o-/J Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009- 10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/lnspectionl AdIninistration SO SO SO SO S24,OOO S24,OOO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Coustruction SO SO SO $0 1 SI60,OOO SI60,OOO Contingency SO SO SO SO S16,OOO SI6,OOO Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S200,OOO $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A ..;ombination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 90 The construction of some (0) ~.2lll>>"',"":,, .. iii E ; t E I I I I' I I I E I I I I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: Traffu: Signal @ Little Mountain and 48th ProgrtUD: CircuJatioD (S_. SipaU and Bridg..) SyllcJll Submitting Dcpartm.../(.): Dcvelopm...t Services DcpartmCllt (Engineering) Project No.: ST -50 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the interscc:tion of Little Mountain Drive and 48th Strccl. Thla signal, whCII developed, will be one of 48 new sianaIs and will rcprcocnt 16.2% of the City's tota1297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the propoacd signal projccll contained in ST-37 throush ST-84 will reprCOCllt a only 16.2% of the tota1297 signals at General PIon build-out while the existing commWlity has gClloratcd g3.g% (249sianaIs) of the total sianaIs. Engineering plan cbeck, inspection, matcrials/lOils testing and project adminimalion coIlll have been included at lS~ of construction c:osts and contingency has been included at lO~ of "construction costs. Justification/Requirement for P~ject: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expoet an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miIos from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-mil... an increase. of 2,923,685 daily trip mil... There arc limits as to how many additiona1lono miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffiC signal configuration is absolutely necessary to ma.:wlmi7"" the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to construct bridge widths where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level -E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as -long queues ofvemcles waiting upstream of the intersection-. Level F, "Forced Flow- creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TouJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Year. Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $21.000 $21.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C olJsfruction $0 I $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $14,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 Potential Fundinp Sources: A .:omblDatlon of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 91 The construction of some (e) . .,).Zlll6. ........... ... IlII t E 1- I I I I 1- s E I I I I I I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Ptojoct Tille: Traffic Sip @ Little Mountain and Northpark Ptognm: Circulation (Strcers, SignalJ and Bridges) System Submimng DoportmOJ//(s): Development Services Department (Enginooring) Ptojoct No.: ST-51 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Uttlc Mountain Drive and Northpatk Boulevard. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new sips and will represent 16.2" of the City's toW 297 signals at Gcaoral Plan buUd-out. All of the proposod sipal prop _..;ned in ST - 37 through ST -84 will rcpr....t s only 16.2" of the toW 297 sips at Gcaoral Plan buUd-oUl while the existing COIlllDUDiry has generated S3.SIt (249 signals) of the total sips. EnSineering plan chock, inspection, materials/soUs testing and project sdministration costJ have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justifleation/Require11Jcnt for Prq,;cct: This intersection noods to be sipized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and willassill in ICCOllllDodating the nesrly 5S" increase in daily trip-Dilles at General Plan build-out resulting from ncw development. This legment of roadway will provide an alterMtive for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now rmd at msximum ..rrying cspscity. The City csn expect an sdditional 57" inCtNK in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,05O,2g9 daily trip-mUes to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-mUes, an incr.... of 2,923,6g5 daily trip miles. There ore limits as to how many sddilionallane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to construct bridge widths where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long qucues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations ratrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. TherefOR all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/0-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-(}9 2009-/0 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out y"", Design/lnspectionl Administration SO SO SO SO S21,000 S21,000 LlUJd AcquisiUonlRight of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO , C ollstruction SO SO : SO SO I S140,000 SI40,ooo Contingency SO SO SO SO S14,000 S14,000 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S175,000 S175,000 Potcnria) Funding Sources: A combination 01 unobligated monies from a variety of funds. dc...e1opment impact fees. IlIld specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be recei...ed. 92 The construction of some (oj -.:..llIIl6.. ... .. t E [ m E I I I E I I I I I E ; I I' City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Prognm: Circu1alioo (Streets. Signals and Bridges) Syllcm Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ State and (-210 Submitting Deparrmen'(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -52 Project-Description: Construct a traffIC signal at the intersec:tion of State Strc<t and 1-210 Rampa. This signal. when developed, will be one of 48 new sigDals and will represent 16.2 % of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan bulld-out. All of the proposed signal projects c:ontained in ST -37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2% of thetota! 297 signals at General Plan bulld-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration cosu have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justjfjcation/Rcquircmenr fOT Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circ:u1ation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S incr.... in dally trip-miles at General Plan bulld-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now rmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57'% inc:rca.sc in the number of daily trip-miles from the culTCAt 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles. an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Pro.iect: Failure or inability to construct bridge widths where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersec:tions of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck.. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and i. identified as "long q...... of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Row" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict Or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the Citf's Circulation Element. Projt:ct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2()()6-{J7 2007-{J8 2008-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO $42.000 $42.000 L1Jld Acquisition/Right of ",'ily SO SO SO $0 $0 $0 Construction SO : SO SO $0 , S280.ooo S280.ooo Contingency SO $0 $0 SO S28,000 S28.ooo Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO $0 $0 TOT Ai. COST SO $0 SO $0 S350,000 S350,000 PotentjaJ Fundinp Sour~es: A ..:ombUlation of unoblif!.ated monics from a variety of funds, development impact fees, andspcclfic a~reements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 93 The construction of some (c) ... .. . i. E I' I I I I I E I I s I ; I I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: TraffIC Signal @ Merdiln and Rialta Program: Circu1ation (Streets, Signals and Bridg..) System Submming DeportmClJt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No,: ST -53 Projoct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Meridian Avenue and Rialto Avenue. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will repr...nt 16.2% of the City'stota! 297 signals at General Plan bulld-out. All of the propoted signal projects conWncd in ST-37 through ST-84 wlll represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan bulld-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of thetota! signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, matcrials/solla testing and prajcc:t administration casu haye been included at IS9'C of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "EM is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Justi/icaUon/RcquiremClJt for Project: This intersC(:tion needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S811 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% inc..... in the number of dally trip-mil.. from the current 5,050.289 dally trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-mil.., an inc..... of 2,923,685 dally trip mil... There arelimils as to how manyaddilionallanc miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal cOnfiguration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore: all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JO-/J Totm PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-JO through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ AdaUnistration SO SO SO SO S24.OOO $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO SI60.ooo SI60,ooo Contingency SO SO SO SO S16.OOO S16,ooo Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S200,ooo S200,OOO Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. projC(:ts listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. . 94 The construchon at some (oj -.".2lO6'" .. . till It "" lit I I I t I ~.. ,- . I ; ; I I I I \ I s I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulotion (Str..... Signals and Bridges) System Project Tid.: Ttamc Signal @ Macy and Mill Submitting DepartmMt(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -54 Project Description: Construct B. traffic signal at the intersection of Macy Street and Mill Street. The project conaists of constructing intcnection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects c:ontaincd in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a oaly 16.2" of the total 297 signals at Gen.ral Plan build-out whil. the.xisting commWlity bas g....rated 83.8" (249 aignala) ofth.total signals. Enginccrin& plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction c05tS and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for ~;ect: This int.rsection needs to b. signalized to complete the Gen.ral Plan Circulotion System and will assist in llCCommodoting the nearly 58" incrcuc in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. Thilacgmcnt of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use bUt now find at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 571 increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-mil.s to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. Ther. ar.limits as to how many additionall... miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely neecuary to maximiZe the General Plan maximum 73S.2lanc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing ProJect: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehiclCl waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. baek-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201G-lJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 l.Mld Acqws.itiOll!Rigbt of W.y $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Construction $0 $0 SO $0 S16O,OOO Contingency $0 $0 SO SO SI6,OOO Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 SO S200,OOO Total .n y..,. SI6O.000 S16,OOO POIMtjlll Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and spec:ific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 95 The construction of some (0) ... .. .. I. ,. . I I E I I I E I I E I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: TraffIC Signal @ Rancho (State) and Foothill Prognm: Circulation (Streets. Signals and Bridges) System Submilling DeportmCllt(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-55 Pr~jt:ct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho Avenue (State) and Foothill Blvd. The project consists of COJlstru~ iDtcnCCtion improvements and instaI1ing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projocta contained in ST -37 through ST -84 will represent I only 16.2" of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generlted 83.8" (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costS and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widcnod, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57" increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffIC signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximiZe the General Plan maximum 73S.2lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Prqject: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level ME" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-()9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out y...,.. Design/Inspection! Administration SO $0 $0 SO S30,OOO S30,OOO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO S200,OOO S200,OOO Contingency $0 $0 SO SO S20,OOO $20,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO SO S250,OOO S2SO.000 ~ ~~- % Ii A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fccs, and specific agreements. The construction or some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. E (0) .,.:~..2OlIIl". .. .. till II '" .. I I I t . E E I E . I , E I t p it City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProfJ1B11J: Circu1alion (Strec:II. Sipalllllll Bridges) Syllem Project Title: Traffic Signal @ MiramolllC IIllI 27th Submitting DcpartmcIlt(,): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-56 Project Description: MConstruct a traffic signal at the intersection of Miramontc Drive and 7th Street. The project consists of constructing interIcdioD improvemenll and installing traffic signals. All of the propo~.ipal projects CODlaincd in ST-37 through ST-84 will rcp..- a oaly 16.2" of the total 297 .ignal. at General Plan build-out while the eJ<iIling community bas generated 83.8" (249 signala) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materialslsoil.tcsting and project administration COIlS have been included at IS" of conatruclion COIlS and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for P~;cct: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58" increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fuul at maximum csrrying cspscity. The City can expect an additional 57% incr.... in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase"f 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many ..""",.,1 lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to ma'l'imi7c the General Plan maximum 73S.2lanc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not CompJeting Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow. and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection M. Level F. "Forced FlowM creates" Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effon. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotJJJ PROPOSED 2~7 2OO7-OS 2OOS-D9 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Ye&rI Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 SO $0 S24.000 S24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO $0 SO $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 SI6O.000 S16O,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 SO S16,000 S16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO S2oo,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. pr6jcc:ts listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 97 The construction of some (e) 1iIiiMry. .... .. flI< .. '" Ii I' Ii I I I I: ; I E E I ; E I E E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Prognm: Circulotion (Streets. Signah and Brid8") Sy_ Projoct Title: Traffie Sip @ Mountain and Kendall Submitting Dcpartmen/(.): Development Service. Depenment (En8ineerin8) Project No.: ST-51 Project Description: Construct a traffic: signal at the intersection of Mountain Drive and Kendall Drive. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installin8 traffie .i8JlO!.. All of the proposed .i8JlO! projects contained in ST-31 throu8h ST-84 will represent e only 16.2~ of the total 297 .i8JlO!. at General Plan build-out whilo tho oxistin8 coll1llllUlily bes 8cnorated 83.8~ (249 .i8JlO!.) of the toosl sipals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at IS% of CODItrUCtion COItI and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justjfjeation/Requircmcnt for Project: Thi. intersection need. to bo .i8JlO!izod to complete the General Plan Cireu1alion Sy_ and will as.ist in accommodarin8 the nearly 58 ~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from Dew development. This segment of roadway will provide aD. IIltemativc for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widelled, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at lIWtimum carryin8 capacity. Tho City can oxpect an additional 51~ increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050,289 dally trip-miles '0 roughly 7,913.974 daily trip-miles. an inerease of 2,923.685 daily trip mil... Thoro arolimits as to how manyadditional1ano miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.2lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201G-ll ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build..."u/ Years Design/Inspection! Administr.tion SO SO SO SO S24,000 S24,OOO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO S16O,000 S16O,OOO Contingency SO SO SO SO S16,000 SI6,OOO Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2OO.000 S2OO,OOO Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 98 The construction of some (0) -.,.. - - - - - .. lit m I I ,. .. t t ,. .. I E EI I I II I Ii . I I t' m City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Mountain and 48th ProgrtUll: Circulation (SlrcctI, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -58 Pr'?,;cct Description: Construct 8 traffic signal at the intersection of Mountain Drive and 48th Street. The project consilll of constructiJlg intersectioD improvements and insllllling traffIC signals. All of the proposccl aignal projecla contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2" of the lC!Ol297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has gcoerated 83.8" (249 signals) of the total signals. EnginNrin& p.... cbock, inspection. materials/soUs testing and project administration costs have been included at IS11 of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This legment of roadway will provide an altemative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd 8t maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S7~ increase in the number of daily trip-milcs from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of2,923.68S daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maxim.izc the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to in5talJ. signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (lOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevCDt movement" . Reference Documtmt: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City,) Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20J(J-lJ TolII/ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009- JO through .0 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO $0 $0 SO S24.OOO S24,ooo LaJld Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 COIJstruction $0 $0 SO SO $160.000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 SO SO S16.OOO $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO $0 S200.ooo S200.ooo Potential Funding Sources: r\ combination of unobhgated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fecs, and specific agreements. proJccts listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. The construction o?~me (0) ,...,." ,.... ....".,'..,...... ........,.... -.,.-.......:.,. - .. - .. '" .. I ; E ,. .. t , ,. . I E E i Ie I ~ I I I ; E I', , E t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (S_, Signals and Bridges) System Project TjtJe: Traffic Signal @ Mountain and Northpark SubnUtUng Dopartment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -59 Project DescrjptjOll: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Mountain Drive and Northpuk Boulevard. The project consistl of COIlItI'UCting intersection improvements and instAlling traffic signals. All ofthc proposed signal projects conWncd in ST-37 through ST-1l4 will represent a only 16.2$ of the total 297 signals at General Plan buUd-out wbile the ellisting community bas generated 83.8$ (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been inc:ludcd at lS~ of construction eosts and contingency has been included at IO~ of construction costs. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would redU" the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intenecti.ODJ of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottlcncc:k. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Justilica1ionlRoqWrement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58" increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an altcmative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Prq;ect TUnblg: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201D-II ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through sil EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspectionl AdministrlJtion SO SO $0 SO S21.OOO S21.OOO Land Acquisition/Right of ",ay $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 c..J/JstructiolJ $0 SO SO $0 ' $140,000 $140,000 ComiJJgency SO SO $0 $0 $14.000 SI4,ooo Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO $0 SO SO TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 SO $175.000 S175.ooo Potential Funding Sources. A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 100 The construction of liOmc (0) I-.y. ... - ... .. .. It I ; I , E c " . I E I E ( E I t E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail P~jec/ Tide: Traffic Signal @ "I" Street and ln1and Center Drive Program: Circulltion (Streets, Signals and Bridges) Sy...... Submilling Deporrmen/(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) ProjeCt No.: ST-60 Pr~;ect Description: Construct a traffic: signal at the intersection of ''}"' Street and Inland Center Drive. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projetU contained in ST-37 through ST-84 wiD represent a only 16.2" of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8" (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan c:hcck. inspcetion. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costa and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement fOT Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S811 increase in daily trip-mUes at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide AD alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57~ increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many .dditiftnllllane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Prqicct: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vchiclct waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Prq}cct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010- JJ Toto! PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-()8 2008-Q9 2009-10 through oJ] EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/lnspection/ Administrtltion SO SO SO SO S24.ooo S24,ooo La.ud Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO, SO $0 COIJstruction $0 i $0 SO $0 ' $160,000 SI60,ooo ContuJgency SO $0 SO SO S16.OOO SI6,ooo Equipment/Other SO $0 SO $0 SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO $0 S2OO,OOO S2OO,OOO Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific a~reements projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 101 The construction of some (0) ~.-,....., - .. ,... .. I'" l. m t ; t ; t E I E I I I I I I I t E , I I , I i i I E E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: Traffic Signal @ "H" Street and Marshall Program: Circulation (Streets. Signals and Bridgos) System Submitting Dopartment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-61 Project Description: Construct a traffic: signal at the intersection of "H" Street and Marshall Boulevard. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projeols contained in ST-37 through 5T-84 will represent a ooIy 16.2" of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8~ (249 signals) aCthe total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and projcet administration costs have been included at 1511 of construction costJ and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JU$tification/RequiremeDt for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for driven who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fiDd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 5711 increase in the number of daily trip-mUes from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-mil.. to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-milos, an incr.... of 2.923,685 daily trip milos. There are limits as to how manyadditionall... miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely DCCClsal)' to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing ~;cct: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduc:c the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/D-ll ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO $0 SO $24.000 S24,OOO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO $0 Construction SO SO $0 $0 i $160,000 SI60.ooo Contingency $0 SO SO $0 $16,000 S16.ooo Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO S200,000 S200,OOO Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific n~recmcnts. projC\:ts listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. The construction1 ~~me (,) ",' .., -',-'--" ~~ZIJ6..;-,.,.. - - jIIIII lIa '" . I ; E ; t c I i I II ! II I r,1 . I , . .1 t E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~i<<t Title: Traffic Signal @ Auto Plaza and Fairw.y ProgrtUD: Circulalion (S_, Signals and Bridges) System Suhmitting Deplutment(.): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -62 Prq;cct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Auto Plaza Drive and Fairway Drive. The project consists of constructing interJection improvements and installing tr.ffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will ropr.....t. oaly 16.2~ of the total 297 signals.t General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8~ (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soUs testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction colts. Justiliation/Rcquire11lenr for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation SyJtem and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S increase in daily trip-mUes at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide IJI alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 571 increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 dally trip miles. There are limits as to how many addition.] lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to ma'l'irn;7C the General Plan maximum 73S.2lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intcncdions of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations reStrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-1/ Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/lnspection/ Ad11Jinjstration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24.000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO $160.000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 SO $16.000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobli~ated monics from a vanety of lunds, development impact fees, and specific a~rccmcnts. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 103 The construction of some (0) -.,.- ... iIw ... L "" &. i ~ ; ; t t [ ~ E I E , E I ; L City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ .E. Street and Cen.ury Program: Circulation (StreelJ, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Deputmen.(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -63 P~;ect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of "E" Street and Century Avenue. The projec;t conailb of constructing intersection improvcmems and installing traffIC signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% ofthe.otaI 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8~ (249 .ignals) of the total signals. Engineering plan ehcck. inspection. materials/soUs testing and project administration costs have been included at 15~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justilication/RoquircJJJt:lJt for Project: This tntcrscction needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan. Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buiId-out resulting from new dcvdopment. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now rmd at maximum carrying capaciry. The City can expeel an additional 5711 incr_ in the numbe. of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additiona1 lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost cstimatc5 that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Projcc:t timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TolIll PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDiTURES Build-out Year> Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S24,OOO S24,ooo Land A<9uisilioofRjgbt of W.y SO SO SO $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 SO $0 SO S160,OOO SI60,OOO Contingency $0 $0 SO SO SI6,OOO S16,000 Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO SO $0 TOT AI.. COST $0 $0 SO $0 S2oo,OOO S2oo,OOO Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 104 The construction of some (0) "'"""'.-..... ".. l. [ r .. ... \. t E E E [ [ E E I I [ E E ; E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail PTC!;ect Tide: Traffic Signal @ "E" Street and Orange Show Lane Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -64 P~;oct Description: Construct a traffic: signal at the intersection of "E" Street and Orange Show Lane. The project consists of constructing intcrlCCtioA improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projec:lS contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will rcpreseata only 16.2" of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8" (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for l'r<l;ecr: This intersec:tion needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will usist in accommodating the nearly SBlI increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% 'increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing PTC?,;ect: Fallure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-GS 200S-G9 2009-10 through .0 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO SO SO S24,000 S24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO $0 SO S16O,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 SO $0 SO $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other SO SO $0 SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 S2oo,ooo S2OO,OOO Potential Funding Sources: 0" A combination of unobiigated monies from a variety of funds. development impa.ct fees, and specific agreements. The construc:tioJ or SODlC projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. :',:: I "'1 ... (e) -.y.211tlll>:' . ~ , ." ~ <iiii.> " ..... .< ... .........>i(ii....... < < ...< ...........i ....... ... ii ....< .......... I City of San Bernardino , i ......... > ..... ....i Master Facilities Plan Project Detail .......... ... ! fiii ........... I. ( <... ...ii>i <<< i.... < ...i.' .i...< ..... ..... . Project Title: PrognI1l: i> Trall"'e: Sip @ Arrowhead and Orange Show Lane Cire:ulllion (S_. Signals and Bridg..) SylleJD Submilling Department(s): Project No.: Development Services Department (Engineering) ST -65 .. ~.i.. Projec:t Description: lt~ i COI\Il1'IICl a traffie: sip at the: inlersec:tion of Arrowhead Avenue and Orange Show Lane. The projcc:t consists of c:onstruc:liDg iDterIKlion improvemonts and installingtrame: signals. All of the proposed sip projec:ts e:ontained in ST-37 through ST-1I4 wID rep_ a only 16.2~ . of the total 297 sips at Gene:ral Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8~ (249 sips) ofthc: total sips. ... Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 1011 of construction costs. .. Ii (i Justification/Requirement for Propt: This intcrscetion needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 'I increase in daily trip-mil.. at Gene:ral Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway wID provide an aI_ve for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, thai: they have previously been able to use but now fUld at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S7l1 increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current S.OSO.289 daily If trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2.923,685 daily trip mil... There are limits as to how many additioJlal lane ..... miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to mayimi7f'; the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane ,i miles of existing collcetor/arterial roads. ) Consequences of Not Completing Project: .... Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of ii streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection" . Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . .) Reference Document: projec:t Timing: .. .... Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Project timing is not 8 component of this current effort. Therefore all 'i Element. projects default to the "Build-out" column. ....... ... Ii I.. 20lo-lJ TouJ Fi PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-}o througb all .i EXPENDITURES Build-out .. y..... Design/inspection! Administration SO SO SO ...... SO S18.OOO S18,000 ii) ) Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO $0 SO SO SO ... Construction SO SO SO ..... SO S120.OOO SI20.000 ii Contingency SO SO SO $0 $12.000 S12,OOO i Equipment/Other SO SO SO $0 SO SO ..... TOTAL COST $0 SO SO $0 $150,000 $150.000 I. . Potential Funding Sources: The constructi~ <t9 aome I A combmation of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific a~reements. projects listed may be required 8S 8 condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (oj .. . . .. . . ..ii i..i. ... . ~.~t :,:,,:>:::,:,::,,::.:.,.-; l'" .. ; t t , E I E E I E I I 5 I I E ,.. .. ~ t I E E I I I ~ I E I E E I E .. .. ; City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Prop Title: Traffic Signal @ Arrowhead and Central ProgrtUl1: Circulation (StreelJ, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: 5T -66 Pro.ied Ducription: Construct a traffic: signal at the intersection of Arrowhead Avenue and Central Avenue. The project consists of constrUcting intcrlOCtion improvements and installing traffle signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through 51-84 will represent 8. only 16.2'1 of the total 297 signals at General Plan bulld-out whlle the existing community has generated 83.8'A; (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15'1 of const:rudion costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justi/ication/RequUement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 ~ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase: in the number of daily trip-miles from the current: 5,050,289 daily trip-mlles to roughly 7.973,974 dally trip-mlles, an increase of 2,923,685 dally trip mll... There are limits as to how manyadditiona11ane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Prop: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvehiclcs waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, .. Forced Flow" creates II Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Prop Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-Q7 2007-QS 200S-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $21.000 $21,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $14,000 EquipmentlOrJJcr $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 Potentia] Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specifiC agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which. credit would be received. 107 The construction of some (oj _.lllllIi. "'. .. t ; I I I I I I E I I I I I I E , I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgrvIJ: Circulation (streets, Sign.ols and Bridg..) SyllClll Project Tide: TraffIC Sign.ol @ Mountain View and 13th Submitting DepartmODt(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-li7 Project Descripaon: ConsIrUct. traffic sign.ol at the inleraeclion of Mountain VieW and 13th Street. The project c:onsim of constructing __ improvements and inatalling tr.ffie sign.ols. All of the proposed signal projOClS contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will rcpr.....t. only 16.2" of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.81 (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soUs testing and project administration costs have been included at IS" of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. - Justifleation/RequircllJCDt for Project: This intcraeclion needs to be sign.olized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly sa" increase in daily trip-milcs at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide III alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now rmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can eXpe<:t an additional S7~ increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the cunent 5,050.289 daily trip-mUes to roughly 7,973,974 d.Uy trip-miles, an iner.... of 2,923,685 daily trip mil... There are limits .s to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21anc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Complding Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and nc:cded would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck, Level "E" is .Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "BuUd-out" column. 201D-J/ Tot.sI PROPOSED 2006-{}7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Year. Design/Inspection/ Adl1Jinjstntion $0 $0 $0 $0 $24.000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potentia) Funding Sources: A ":vmbmtltlon of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 108 The construction of $Ome . ...... ~...r\%fr!;' (ol "'" 1111 " ill II; I I I I I I I I I I I I I m t ; City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Proj<<:t Tjde: Traffic Signal @ Mountain View and Marshall Program: Circulation (Streets. Sipa1s and Bridges) System Sub",;lting Depsrtrnent(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Proj<<:t No.: ST-68 Project Description: Construct a traffic signals. the intcrscetion of Mountain View and Mulhall Boulevard. The project consists of CODItI'ucting iDtenec:tion improvements and installing traffic siglUlls. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will rcp~ a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8" (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils-testing and project administration costs have been included at lSlI of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustifjelftionlRequirement for Project; This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 Ii increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of rocdway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now rmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 51% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 13S.21anc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection", Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movementN. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City:s Circulation Element. Pro,iect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201Q-ll ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-()9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S24.000 S24.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO $0 $0 COJJstruction SO SO $0 SO SI6O.000 SI6O.000 Contingency SO $0 $0 SO SI6.000 SI6.000 Equipment/Other SO $0 $0 SO SO $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO S2oo.000 S2OO.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The constructionloQ~me projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. (e) . r .~,~.. ....... . ,. 1. E E I I t I I I ; I I I I I ; I m i City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Progt81lJ: Circu1alion (Streets. Si8JIIIs and Bridges) System Project Title: TraffIC Signal @ Electric ond 48th Submitting Deputmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -69 Projoct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Electric Avenue and 48th Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements ond installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2lli of the total 297 signals at General Pion build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8lli (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering pion <beck. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at IS" of construction costs and contingency b.u been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the ......Iy 58lli incr.... in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new deve1op""", This segment of roadway will provide on alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fUld at maximum carrying capacity. The City con e.pecton addilional57lli increase: in the number of daily !rip-miles from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, on increase: of 2.923,685 daily trip mil... There are limits as to how mony addilionallone miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffIC signal configuration is absolutely necessary to ma'l:inli7(' the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Nor Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intcncctions of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a -bottleneck. Level "E" is "Ullltable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehiclCl waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Documenr: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pro.;ecr Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effon. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010- JJ Tot,,} PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-1J9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-our Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 COllstructioll $0 . $0 $0 $0 i $160.000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16.000 $16,000 EquipmeJJt/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 r Potential Funding Sources: 1 0 . A wmbUlallOn 01 unobligated monies from a ....anety of funds, development impact fees, and specific a~rcemcnts. The construction l( some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. , (cj II!IIII ~ E i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide, Traffic Signal @ Dolinlc and Mill Program: Circulation (StrCClS, Signals and Bridges) System Submirring DcpartJ1Jt:llt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No,: ST-70 P~jcct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Doolittle Street and Mill Street. The projec:t consists of constructing intersection improvements and insWIing traffIC signals. All orlbc proposed signal projects conWncd in ST-37 through 5T-84 will rcprcscnla only 16.2" of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community haS generated 83.8~ (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Prqjecr: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8lJ increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an altcmative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S7~ increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how manyadclitionallane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely ne=ssary to maYim17C the General Plan maximum 73S.21uae miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing P~iect: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream. of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Row" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201Q-ll TomJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out y cars Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S12,000 S12,000 i Lfwd Acquisition/Right of Wax SO SO . SO $0 SO SO COl/struction SO SO SO SO : S80,000 S80,000 Contingency SO SO SO SO S8,000 S8,OOO Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO Sloo,OOO SI00,OOO Potential Funding Sources: A l:umbinahon of unobligated monies from a variety of iunds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 111 The construction of some (e) -.,.:mi ..' ... .. .... .. I E I I I I I t I I E I I I E I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: TraffIC Signal @ Lena and Orange Show Road Program: Circulolion (Streets, Signal> and Bridges) System Submirting Deportment!.): Development Servic.es Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-71 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Lena Road and Orange Show Road. The project consists of construCting intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the propoacd signal projects conrainccl in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% oftbe lotal297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction colts and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justjfj~tion/Requircment for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S81 inc..... in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of rocclway will provide an altcmativc for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fuui at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional S7~ increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-mil.s, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how manyadditiona11anc miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely nec:essary to mll'll'in117e the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of exi,,-ing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing PrC?,ject: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce thc Level of Scrvice (LOS) traffic flow at thc intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Ti11Jjng: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TouJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDlTURES BuiJd-out Years Design/lnspection/ Adznjnjs/ration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0. $0 i $0 $0 $0 $0 I I C onsrruction SO SO : $0 SO , $160.000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16.000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 .000 $200,000 Potential Fundinp Sources: A combina.tion of unobligated monics from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific <1J!.rcements. The constructio~ ktsome projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (,) r I)',:illlll(:::>:> !'" II. t I E I I I I I I I I I I I I E I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projo<:t Tide: Traff", Signal @ Lena and Centrol ProgTIUIJ: _ Circulation (StreelJ, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Departmenr(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-72 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Lena Road and Central Avenue. The project coAJiltl of constructing intenectioG im.proYe.meDtI ond inslaIIing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects _cd in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2. of the total 297 sig.oIs at Ge.erol Pion build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8. (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs hav.c been included at 1511 of c;onstruction costs and ~gency has been lnc1udcd at 10% of construction costs. JustificationlRoquiremMt for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an a1temative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can eltpect an additional 5711 incrcuc in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There ..elimits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely ncccasary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed ~itions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference DOCUlDcnt: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20iQ-ll ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDiTURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ AdlIJinjstration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24.000 LtllJd Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0. $160.000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16.000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific a~recments. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 113 The: construction of some (c) . J..... ..' .1006 "" III ............ ........ . .< ....... ... ........... 277........... ... . . i I City of San Bernardino I I < I ...... Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I 1</ . ..... .. '/. ........ ..........i... .... i' Projod Tide: ProgrtUll: Traffic Signal @ Lena and RiallO Circulation (Strcc:ts, Signal. and Bridges) System I Submitting Department!s): Projod No.: i. Development Services Department (Engineering) ST-73 / P~jcct Description: ii Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Lena Road and Rialto Avenue. The project COJIIistJ of constructing intersection improvements .> and installing traffic .ignal.. All of the proposed .ignal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2" of the lOlal297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8" (249 .ignal.) of the total.ignals. Enginccriing plan check, i...... inspection. materials/soUs testing and projcd. administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has bcleD. ..... included at 10% of construction costs. i> }> Justification/Rcquircmcnt for Project: >i >> This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and wID 8S5ist in accommodating the nearly S8l1 increase: in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-ouI resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an a1lmnativc for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to UIe but now fmd at . maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57" increase in the number of daily trip""milcs from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip""miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as 10 how many additionallanc . miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic: signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane } miles of existing collector/arterial roads. ./ Consequences of Not Completing Project: i Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the: intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting (( upstream of the intersection" . Level F. "Forald Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . }i i Refcrtllcc Document: Project Timing: ( Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all . Element. projects default to the "Build-out" column. ; , ......... , ( 2010-11 ToltJJ PROPOSED 2()()6-()7 2007-08 2oo8-1J9 2009-10 through .0 i EXPENDITURES Build-out Years } i Design/Inspectionl AdministrlJ.tion SO SO SO SO S24,000 $24,000 /> I }< Land Acquisition/Right of Ws_v SO SO SO SO SO SO .. Construction SO SO SO SO SI6O,ooo SI6O,ooo . COJltiJJgcncy SO SO SO SO S16.OOO S16,000 >> > >i Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO . SO SO ... , TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2OO,OOO $200,000 Potential Funding Sources; .i A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. The constructioJ Afsome: / projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (0) . '. ................ ............ ..... .'>.> ..... .. .... .....,.2lI!lt) ..... .. ... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !I'" .. r- .. m I I I I I I I I I I I E I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streets, Sipal. and Bridges) System P~ioct Titl.: TraffIC Signal @ Lena and 3rd Submitting Doparrmont(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-74 P~joct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Lena Road and 3rd Street. The project COIIIiJIts of COIIIlrUCling inlenection improvcmeata and installing traffic .ignal.. All of the proposed .ignal projects containodin ST -37 through ST -84 will represent a only 16.2" of the IOl.Il 297 .ignols al Generol Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8" (249 signals) of the total.ignals. Engineerin& plan check, inspection, materials/solls testing and project administration costs have been included at lSII of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justilication/Rcquircmt:nt for Pro.ft:ct: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S811 increase in daily trip-miles at Generol Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an olternalIve for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an addilionol 57" increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-mile. to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-mile., an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip mil... There are limits as to how many additiona1lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely ncecuary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collcetor/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Projcet timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projcets default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-1/ TotIIl PROpOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-09 2009-10 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Admi.aistntion $0 $0 $0 $0 $24.000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ConstrUction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160.000 $160,000 Contingt:lJcy $0 $0 $0 $0 $16.000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200.000 . Potential Funcling Sources: 1\ A combination of unobhgi1cd monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The constru~JrS.ome. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. m (c) "" ... " .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II ! I I (e) City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (StrcelJ, Sipals and Bridges) Syllem Project Title: TraffIC Signal @ East Carnegie and HospiUl Lane SublDilling Deportm~I(S): Development Services Deportment (Engineering) Project No.: ST-75 Project Descriptio,,: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of East Carnegie Drive and Hospitality Lane. The project consists of constructing intenectiOll improvements and inIIaIIing traffic signals. All of the proposecllignal projec:la contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will rcprcscnt a OIIiy 16.2" of the totAl 297 aignals at General Plan build-out wbile the exilling community bas g__ 83.8" (249 signals) of the totAl signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project adminiltration costs have been included at 1S% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8 Ii increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an altcrDative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway acgmcnts, lUIllble to be widcoed. tIW they have previously been able to uac but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additiOllll! 57" incrcaac in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.0SO,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973.974 daily trip-miles. an incrccsc of 2.923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how manyadditional1anc mUes can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21anc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not CompJt:ti.ng Prq;ect: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a' bottleneck. Level HE" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vchiclCl waiting upstream aCthe intersection", Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-1/ Tot.ai PROPOSED 2006-07 2()()7-oS 2()()S-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDiTURES Build-our Years Design/lnspectionl Administration $0 $0 $0 SO S18.OOO $18.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO S120.OOO $120,000 Contingency $0 $0 SO $0 $12.000 $12.000 Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 SO S150,000 S150.ooo Potentia} Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreemertts. projects listed may be required liS a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 116 The construction of some - ... ... . . .. . ......... ... . ..' . I.' I City of San Bernardino I , , I , Master Facilities Plan Project Detail .i... ." I .. ........>. >... . Project Title: Program: >/ Traffic Signal @ Tippocanoo and Ria1to Circulation (Stroeta. Signa1s and Bridgos) Systom Submitting DopartmOlJ/(s): Projoct No.: Developmoot Services Department (Engineering) ST-76 '/ Projec/ Description: // Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Tippecanoe and Rialto AvCJlue. The project consiIts of construding intersection izaprovemcats I/i and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 5T-37 through 5T-84 will represenl a only 16.21' of the total 297 1/ signal' at Gooeral Plan buUd-out while the existing community has geaerated 83.81' (249 signals) of the total signals. En8ineering plan chec:k. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15~ of construction costs and contingency has been / included at 10% of construction costs. r Ii . // Justification/Requirement for Project: / This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S /> increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for // drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but DOW find at maximum carryin8 capacity. The City can expect an additional 571' incr.... in the number of daily trip-milos from the current 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973.974 daily trip-miles. an increase of 2.923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane I miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.21ane miles of ex.isting collector/arterial roads. ..... Consequences of Not Completing Project: ~ Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the interscetions of streets to a Level E or F by acting as 8 bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection-. Level F. "Forced Flow" creates - Jammed ~onditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent i movement" . >> Reference Document: Project Timing: i> I Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all I Element. projects default to the "Build-out" column. / .... 20JQ-JI ToIIIl I; Ii PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-D9 2009-JO through all i EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I i , Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 SO SO S24,000 $24.000 i Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 ......... ". I Construction $0 SO $0 SO SI6O,ooo S16O.ooo i ... i ., Contingency SO $0 SO SO S16,000 S16.ooo ii Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 SO $0 S2OO,~ {II TOTAL COST SO $0 $0 SO S2oo,ooo I Potential Funding Sources: 117 A combination of unobligated monics from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and spcc:ific agreements. Thc construction of some I projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. I (c) . .......0...--: ....... ........ 'i. '. ...~;lIlIllIi..... '" IiIl ~ ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ .... ~ ... c I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project TftJ.: TraffIC Signal @ Del Rosa and Marshall Program: Circulolion (SlreelI, Signal. and Bridg..) Sy...... Subwtting Deparrment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) P"!ject No.: ST-77 Pro,;ect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Del Rosa Avenue and Marshall Boulevard. The project: consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic .ignals. All of the proposed ligna! projects eontained in ST-37 through ST-84 will repreoent a only 16.2\11 of thelotal 297 .ignal. al General Plan build-out while the existing commWlily hu generated 83.8\11 (249 .ignal.) of the totaIllignalo. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of eonstruetion costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustifiClltion/Rcqui.rement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S incr.... in daily trip-mil.. at General Plan build-out reoulting from new development. This ..gmoot of roadway will provide an alternative for drivets who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 5711 increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of cxisting collector/artcrial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Servicc (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimatcs that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pro.i<<t Timing: Project timing is not a component of this currcnt effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-outH column. 20/D-ll Tor.a/ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-og 200g-Q9 2009-/0 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out y..... Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S24.OOO $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO COIJstructioJI SO SO SO SO S16O,000 SI6O,ooo Contingency SO SO SO SO S16,000 S16,000 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S200.ooo S200,000 Potentia] Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. Thc constructiJn1 ~ some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (0) s-.,.~"'. - ... .. " II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Tram. Signa1 @ Del Rosa and 6th Program: Circulation (Str..... Signa1s and Bridges) System Submitting Dcportmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-78 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Del Rosa Avenue and 6th Street:. The project consists of constructing interleCtion improvements and installingtraffi. signa1s. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will rcprcscnta only 16.2l11 ofthc totsI297 signa1s at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.8l11 (249 agnals) of the total signa1s. Engineering plan cbec:k. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration com have been included at I5l1 of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 585 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out rcsulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now find III maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect: an additi~ S7~ increase in the number of dally trip-miles from the current S,OSO.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 dally trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 dally trip miles. Tbere are limits as to how many additional I... miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce: the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intcraec:tions of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow. creates .lammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201D-II TotoJ PROPOSED 2006-C7 2007-oB 2008-<J9 2009-10 through oJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $18.000 $18,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 ~ Potential Fundinp Sources: II A combination of unobligated momes from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. The constructioll? some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. I (c) ~).-} - ... lit "" lIIr I t I I I I I I I I I I ; I I ; I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Sterling and MarshaIJ Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Deparrment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-79 P~ject Description.. Construet a traffic signal at the intersection of Stcring Avenue and Maraball Boulevard. The project COIlSists of constructing intenection improvements and in5talling trafflc signals. All oflbe proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represcnta only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soUs testing and project administration c:.osts have been. included at 1511 of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10$ of c:onstruetion costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: Tbis interacclion nceds to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will a..ist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for driven who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57~ mcrease in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Projoc:t: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Row" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20iQ-U Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-iO through all EXPENDiTURES Build-out Ycsrs Design/Inspection! AdminisrrlJtion $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO COllstructioJJ $0 $0 $0 $0 ' $!()(),ooo $160,000 Contingency SO SO SO $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 SO $0 $0 $0 SO TOTAL COST SO SO $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 120 The construction of some (,) ~.- "" , ill c m I I I r .. I I I I I I I I I . i I I , ! i City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: TraffIC Signli @ Sterling ond Lynwood Prognm: Circu1alion (S_, Signals ond Bridges) System Submitting Dopsrtmont(s): Development Services D.parllllent (Engineering) Project No.: ST -SO Pr~;cct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Sterling Avenue and Lynwood Drive. The project consiJts of cOllltrUCting iDtcncctioIl improvements ond installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal project> contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2" of the total 297 signals at General Pion build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.8" (249 signals) of tho total sigaals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been inc:ludcd at 15% of construction coIlS and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustificaUon/RequiremMt for Project: This intersection noods to be signalized to complete tho General Plon Circulation System ond will assist in accommodating the nearly 58" increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting. from new dcvelopmeat. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fUld 8t awtimum carrying capacity. The City can expott on additional 57" inc:rosae in tho number of dally trip-miles from the current 5.050.289 dally trip-mil.sto roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, on iner.... of 2,923.685 dally trip miles. Ther_ ar_limits as to how monyaddilionallono miles can be constructed. thus C?ptimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21anc miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted aild needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehieIC$ waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document.- Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City.'s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-1i TouJ PROPOSED 2oofHJ7 2007-08 2OOB-D9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years JJesjgn/lnspottionl Adminisrration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 C01Jstruction $0, $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160.000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16.000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potentja} FunduJg Sources: A combination of unobliJstcd monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specit1c 8j:'.rcemcnts. The constructioJ ~~ some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (cl . .... ;; 1II101i":+>::':: .... .. ... ill '" .. . It t I I I I I I I I I .1 I I E I E i City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: TraffIC: Signal @ Sterling II1d 6th Progrom: Circulation (5_. Signa1IW Bridges) System Submining Depurtn<JlI(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Proj<<:1 No.: ST-81 P~ject Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Sterling Avenue and 6th Street. The project consiltl of constructing intencction improvements II1d installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will reprcsart a oaIy 16.2!' of the total 297 signals It Gooeral PI.. buUd-out while the existing community has g_rlled 83.8!' (249 signall) of the total signals. Engineering plan cbock.. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costa have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justil1cationlRcquin:mcnt for ProFt: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly SIIi incrccse in daUy trip-miles at General PI.. buUd-out resulting from new developm..... This segment of roadway will provide 111 altcrnllive for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect 111 addiliooal 57!' increaac in the number of daily trip-miles from the curr.... 5.050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.685 dally trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a "bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-()8 2008-()9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Yean Dcsign/lnspcctionl Administration SO SO SO $0 $24.000 S24.ooo LaJJd Acquisition/Right of Wax $0 $0 $0 SO SO SO Construction SO I $0 SO $0 $160.000 $160.000 COJJtuJgency SO $0 $0 $0 I $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO : SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2OO.000 S200.OOO Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobli~ated monics from a varicty of funds, development impact fees. and specific itJ!recmcnts. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 122 The construction of some (oj ~, 2006 I"" Ii. s ........ .... .<. .... .....<. j .. < .. City of San Bernardino I .. .>..... .. Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I ..<i , ... .... ...>. < Projcet Tide: Program: >> Tram< Sipal @ S, MolUllain View ond Ceotral (Palm Meadows) Circulatioll (Streets. Sipals ond Bridg..) Syllcm ........ SubJDjIling DepMtment(s): ProF No.: . Development Services Department (Engineering) ST -82 > ...... Project Description: Construct a traffle signal at the intersection of South Mountain View and Central (Palm Meadows). The project consists of constructing ...... intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2l1 of the total 297 signals at General Pion build-out while the existing <ommunity has generated 83.8l1 (249 signals) of the total i> ..... signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and projcet administration costs have been included at lSlI of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. i < < < .. Justification/Requirement for Project: > This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 585 . increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at it maximum osrrying ospa<ity. The City can eXpe<t an additional 5711 inor_ in the number of dally trip-miles from the cUlTClll 5.050.289 dally trip-mil.. to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-mil... on in<r_ of 2.923,685 dally trip mil... There are limits as to how mony additiona1lone miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 73S.21anc I I miles of existing collector/arterial roads. 1\ Consequences of Not Completing Project: 1 Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the interscc.tions of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent tT movement" . ......... II Referenu Document: Project Timing: }i Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all I Element. projects default to the "Build-out" column. t i I ... I 20/0- II TolIJ1 ............ i PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 through aJJ i itt I..... EXPENDITURES Build-out Years De5ign/lnspcctionl Administration SO SO SO $0 S24.OOO S24,ooo , I Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO S160,000 SI60,ooo .. . Contingency SO SO SO SO S16.OOO S16.ooo I Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO I SO SO Ii i ? TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S200,000 S200.ooo I I Potential Funcilng Sources: ..... I 123 A combination of unob1i~ated monies from a variety-of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some i projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for whieh a credit would be received. (c) ..... ... .> > .. -.,.2lll6 ; ; .. I I I I 1- I I I I I I I I i ,.. .. t : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ~joct Tide: Traffic Signal @S. Mountain View and 1-10 Westbound Ramp Progrom: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) Syllem Submitting Deparrment(.): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -g3 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of South Mountain View and Watbound 1-10 Ramp. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the propolCd signal projects contained in 51-37 through ST -84 will represent · only 16.2% of the total 297 .ignal. at General Plan build-out while the exiJtlllg community has generated 83.8% (249 .ignal.) of the total signals. Engineering plan check.. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at lS~ of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 S increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from .new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional. 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "EM is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JQ-ll Toul PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-JO through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out You. Design/Inspection/ AdmirJjstration SO SO SO SO S24,ooo S24,ooo Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO $0 $0 SO $0 Construction SO $0 $0 SO S16O,ooo S16O,000 Contingency $0 $0 SO SO S16,000 S16,000 Equipment/Other SO $0 SO $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO $0 S200,ooo S200,ooo Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 124 The construction of some (c) -.,.-. "" .. t I I' I I E I I I I II I t I I t E E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streols, Signals and Bridges) System Project Titl.: Trsffic Signal @ Guthrio and Pscific Submirting Dopartment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-84 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Guthrie Street and Pacific Street. The project consiJtJ of constructing intersection improvements and installing tramc signals. All of tho proposed signal projects c:ontained in ST-37 through ST-84 will repr.....t a only 16.2" ofth. toW 297 signals at Genoral Plan buUd-out whilo tho oxisting community has gonoralOd 83.8" (249 signa1s) of tho total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at lSII of construction costs and contingency has been lncluded at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8l1 increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new developmcm.t. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative Cor drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now rand at maximum c:arrying ..pscily. Tho City can oxpoc:t an additional 57" inc..... in tho number of dally trip-miles from tho current 5,050,289 dally trip-milo, to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-milos, an iner.... of 2,923,685 dally trip miles. There aro limits as to how many sdditionallane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely ncccuary to ma:!!irni71l'! the General Plan maximum 73S.2Iane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "E" is "Unstable Flow. and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201Q-ll PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009--10 through EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO $0 SO $0 Constructjon $0 $0 $0 $0 SI6O.000 Contingency $0 $0 SO SO $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO $0 $200 ,000 TOIII1 a1J Years $24,000 $0 S16O,000 S200,OOO .Potential Funding Sources: 125 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction otsolDO projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (.) '"" ill E I. ( I I I I I I I E I I I I I I E t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgrtUl1: Circulation (streets, Sigaa1s and Bridges) System Project Title: Interchange/Ramps @ 1-215 and Palm Avenue (SB, County) Submitting DepartmCllt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projoct No.: ST-85 Projcct Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-215 and Palm Avenue. This project is eonsidcrod of regional importance and is to be fmanced by. number of soureca. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. JustifiC/ltion/Rcquirement for Project: Improve safety and mobility and to enhance the operational efficiency of this regional facility. Secondarily, improving this regional facility increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201Q-ll TotJJl PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008_ 2009-10 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out Y..... Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO SO SO S231.600 S231.600 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO $1.544,000 SI.544,OOO Contingency SO $0 SO SO SI54,400 SI54,400 Equipment/Other SO $0 SO $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO SI.930.000 SI.93O,OOO PotentjaJ Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monics from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specifu~ agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 126 The construaion of some (c) ... IIIIf .. ... I I I E I I I I I I I . II I I f r It r II City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Proj<<:t Title: JntcrehanplRamp. @ 1-215 and Pepper Linden (Campu, Parkway) (SB) Submitting Depurmen/(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Progrll/lJ: Cireulation (5_, Signals and Bridges) System Projoct No.: ST-86 Proj<<:t Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-215 and pepper Linden (Campu. Parkway). This project is conaidered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sourees. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Proj<<:t: Improve safety and mobUity and to enhance the operational efficiency of this regional facUity. SecondarUy, improving this regional facility increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobUity along with increaaed congestion and greater frequency of routine delay.. Reference Document: Projoct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/D-II PROPOSED 2006-07 2oo7-(}8 2008_ 2009-/0 through EXPENDITURES Build-our Design/lnspection/ AdI1Jinjstr4lion SO SO SO SO S2,4OO.OOO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO $0 SO Sl6.ooo,ooo Contingency SO $0 SO SO S1.6OO,ooo Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO S20.ooo,ooo TotJJl al/ Years S1.6OO,OOO $0 S20,ooo,ooo Potential Funding Sources: 127 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projccts listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (e) ... .. .. . , I I t E I E I E I E I I I ! t t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: IntetchangclRampa @ 1-215 and Univenity Parkway (SB, County) ProgrtUll: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) Syllem Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: S1-g7 P~jcct Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-215 at University Parkway. This project: is CODIidered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. JusrificationlReqWn:ment for Project: Improve ..fety and mobility and to enhance the operational efficiency of this regional facility. Secondarily, improving this regional facUity increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequen... of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/0-// Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2oo7-D8 2oo8-<J9 2009-/0 through sJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO SO $0 $187.200 $187,200 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.248.000 $1,248,000 ContuJgency $0 SO $0 $0 $124.800 $124.800 Equipment/Other SO SO SO $0 $0 SO TOTAL COST SO SO $0 $0 $1.560,000 $1,560,000 Potentjal FundinS Sources: A combi.nation of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. projects listed may be required 85 a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 128 The construction of some (0) JdltIh)',:200i6 ... /If ,. .. r . 1- ; t E I p .. I E E E t I I I t t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ~jcct Title: Interchange/Ramps @ (-210 and Waterman (SB. Highland, County) Program: Circulation (StreclJ. Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartm<ll/{'): Development Services Dcpsrtment (Engineering) Project No.: ST -88 P~jcct Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-210 at Waterman Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanccd by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Pr~jt:cr: Improve safety and mobility and to enhance the operational efficiency of this regional facility. Secondarily, improving this regional facility increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Refcrt:Dce DocUlllcnt: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JD-JJ ToW PROPOSED 2006-D7 2007-08 2008-D9 2009-JO through all EXPENDITURES Build-out y..... Design/Inspection/ AdllJinjstration SO SO $0 $0 S873,6OO S873.6OO Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO SO $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 SO SO I S5.824,000 S5,824,OOO Contingency SO $0 $0 SO S582,4OO S582.4OO Equipment/Other SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO $0 $0 SO $7,280,000 S7,28O,ooo Potentja} Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and speciftc a~reements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 129 The construction of some (0) -.,..1101>>.... - . ~ II ., III .. c ; I: I I I I E E E t E I I I I t t I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro;oct Tide: In~chan&eIRamps @ 1-210 and Dol Rosa (S8, HighIond, County) Program: Circulation (StrcelI, Signols and 8ridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -89 Prq,jcct Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-210 at Del Rosa Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be f1Dl.nCCd by · number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Imptove safety and mobility and to enhance the operational efficiency of this regional facUity. SecondarUy, improving this regional facUity increases mobUity on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not ComplctiJJg Prqjt:ct: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToIlI/ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-()S 200S-()9 2009-10 through .0 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO S694 ,800 $694,800 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO $0 ' $4,632,000 $4,632,000 ' Contingency SO SO SO SO $463,200 $463,200 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 S5,790,OOO S5,790,OOO Potential Fundinp Sources' A combination of unobligated momes from a varil.":ly of funds. development impact fees. and specific a,grccmcnts. The constructio~309 some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (,) ~.-"::" - .. ,. III ; i ; E I I r II , E E E E I , I E t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streets, Sigaals and Bridges) System Project Tide: interchange/RamI" @ 1-210 and Victoria (SB, Highland, County) Submitting Dcpartment(s): Development Services Dopartment (Engineering) Project No.: ST -90 Prq,;ecr Description: Construct interchange improvements at at 1-210 at Victoria Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and i. to be fUlAllCOCl by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. JustiJiCII.tion/RfKJWrement for Prq,jcct: Improve safety and mobility and to enhance the operational efficiency of this tcgional facility. Secondarily, improving this tcgional facility increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JQ-lJ ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-1)8 2oo8-<J9 2009-10 throusb .0 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Desi/ln/lnspcctjonl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 58,000,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 ,000 $800,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 PotentiaJ FUlJdillg Sources: A combmation of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. projc'tll lillted may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. 131 The construction of some (c) . . ".- ... - l1li ,.. .. = tII I( t m E ; " . I t t i ~ i t \ I I t t I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: InterchangclRamps @ 1-210 and 5th (SB, Highland, Redlands) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Su~mitring Doparrment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-91 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-210 at 5th Street. This projcct is considered of regional importance and is to be f1JWlCCd by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. JustilicMionIRequireJnent for Project: Improve safety and mobUity and to enhance the operational efficiency ofthiJ regional facUity. SecondarUy, improving thiJ regional facility increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Project Timing: I" Projcet timing is not a component of this current effort. ; projects default to the "Build-out" column. Reference Document: Therefore all 20/D-II Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! AdlIJinjstraUon SO SO SO SO S38,4OO S3g,4OO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO $256,000 $256,000 Contingency SO ; SO SO SO S25,6OO $25,600 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S320,ooo S320,ooo I PotentiaJ Funding Sources: : A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific a~recments. I projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. The constructiJn3oi some 0-_-. _ ..'1 .:: -.y. :IIllllf':"'.'.. . (oj ... .. r' .. I ; ; m I I c I t t I , , t . E \ t t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: Interchange/Ramp. @ 1-10 and Tippecanoe ProgrtUD: Circulotion (Strcct.s, Signal. and Bridges) System Submirtmg Dcpartmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-92 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at }-10 at Tippecanoe Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fUWlccd by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justificstion/Roquiremenr for Project: Improve safety and mobility and to enhance the operational efficiency of this regional facility. Secondarily. improving this regional facUity increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference DocUl1Jent: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201Q-lJ Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through .0 EXPENDiTURES Build-out Ycan Designflnspcction/ AdrrJinjstrarjon $0 $0 $0 $0 $840.000 $840.000 Land A<qujsjtionlRigbt of W.y $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,600.000 $5.600.000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000 $560,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000.000 $7,000,000 Potential Funding Sour~cs: 131 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. devdopment impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction. 01 some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. (0) '" ... !'" .. I ( E E I I E I t E I t I ! .. . t t t , City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro".",: Circu18lion (Streets, SisnaIs and 8ridg..) System ProF Title: InterchangelRamps @ 1-10 and Pepper (58. County. Colton) Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-93 ~jcct Description: Construct interchange iprovcments at 1-10 at Pepper. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by . number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. JustinCll.tjon/Rcqukement for Project: Improve safety and mobility and to enhance the operational efficiency of this regional facUity. Secondarily. improving this regional facility increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congC&tion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: Projccl Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201Q-IJ TOl.Ii PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out y...,. DesignlbupcctiOJll Admin/strotlon $0 $0 SO SO $44.400 $44.400 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 Construction $0 SO $0 SO S296,OOO $296.000 Contingency SO SO SO SO S29.600 S29,600 Equipment/Other SO $0 SO SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO $0 S370,000 S370,ooo Potential Funding Soure..: 134 A combination of unobligated monics from a variety of funds. development impact f~1 and spcc:ific agreements. The construction of some proj<<:ts listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. (0) ... .. r lit I m . E I I t I t .c E E t . . t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projt:el Tid.: Interchange/Ramps @ 1-10 and Mountain View (58, Loma Linda, Redlands, County) Submitting Dep.lnmenl(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Prognm: Circulalion (StreclJ, Signals and 8ridges) System Projt:el No.: ST -94 Project Description.- Construct interchange improvements at 1-10 at Mountain View Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanccd by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. JustjfiC4lionlRcquiremenl for Projeet: Improve saCety and mobility and to enhance the operational efficiency oC this regional CacUity. Secondarily, improving this regional Cacility increases mobility on the local circulation system. Consequences of Not Completing Projee/: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Rd'ercncc Document: Projeet Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/0-1/ ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-DS 200S-09 2009-/0 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out y..... Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $364,800 $364,800 Land Acquisition/RighI of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construcrion $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,432,000 $2.432,000 ConriJlgency $0 $0 $0 $0 $243,200 $243,200 Equipment/Other $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,040,000 $3,040,000 t' . Potenrial Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development: impact fces. and specific agreements. The ~ 30i IOme projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. r- III (.) io-7. -> - .. ",.. IIIJ I ~. ~ E I I t I c E ~ t , E t -"-;-, City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Tippcc:anoc Bridge ovor tho Santa Ana River Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) Systom Submitting Departmen'(s): Development Sorvices Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -95 Project Description: Widen the existing 756 long bridge by twenty-four feet. JustiJication/RequireJDen' for Prqject: Increases the flow of traffic. and thus the circulation system LOS, over the current bottleneck bridge. Consequences of Nor Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201D-II TotIll PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008_ 2009-10 through aJ1 EXPENDITURES Build-out Yean Design/lnspectionl Administrotion $0 $0 $0 $0 $352,350 $352,350 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO $0 SO $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,349,000 $2,349,000 Contingency SO $0 $0 $0 S234.9oo $234,900 Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 SO $2.936.250 $2,936,250 r Potential Funding Sources: II A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The constructiO~30~ some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. t (el ......,..2llO6')"'. c t I ; i E I I I ; E c f t t E t t t (e' City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProB'""': Circulation (Strecli, Sipo1s and 8ridges) Syllcm Project Tide: Grade Separation @ Palm Avenue (S8) Submitting DeportmaJt(s): Development Serviees Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-96 Project Description: Construct a grade aeparation at Palm Avenue. This project is eonsiderccl of regional importlnce and is to be fmanc:cd by a number of aourc:a. This portion represents the City's share aCthe total project. JustiligtionlRequire11Jent for Project: Enhance safety by providing a verliae aeparation between rail road traffic: and vcbicular trame. This project a1ao improves opcraIioD of the intersection as stoppage of vehicular trafflC will no longer be neeeuary. ConsequMces of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: Project Timing: Projcd: timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "BuUd-out" column-. 2010-/1 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2oo7-og 2oog-G9 2009- 10 througb aJJ EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 SO S281.880 S281 ,880 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO $0 $0 SO $0 $0 Constructi01J SO SO $0 SO SI.879,2oo SI,879,2oo Contingency SO $0 SO SO S187,920 S187,920 Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S2,349.OOO S2,349,ooo Potential Funding Sources: A ,ombinaHon of unobHgated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction1oi1,me projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. t . ... . . ............ ... . ...................... ... City of San Bernardino < .......... . Master Facilities Plan Project Detail .............. <... .... . ... . . .........iii...........< i".<i.i..... ,< ./ ..... < Pro.iect Titl.: 1'rognm: Grade Soparation @ Ria1to (58) Circulation (SlrOOll. Signals and 8ridg..) Systom I SubmittiDg Dopsrrment(sJ: Projoct No.: . Development Services Department (Engineering) ST-97 i ..'...... P~joot Dosoription: III i COnstTct a grade separation at Rialto Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanccd by . number of iOUtceI. This portion roprosonts tho City's share of the total project, .,. ....... \ ,..... i i Ju,tiI1C1Jtion/Requircment for Project; ..... .. Enhance safety by providing a vcrticlc separation between rail road traffic and vehicular traffic. This project also improvcs operation of the I mtersection as stoppage of vehicular traffic will no longer be necessary. i '..' II < Consequonc.. of Not Comp/oting Projoot: .,' Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine dclays. ) Iii i.) ......., Reference Document: Prq}cct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all i projects default to the "Build-out" column. ....... i 'i' ii 2010-11 TouI PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Yoars i. ! Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO SO $0 S267,840 S267,840 ,/ I Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO SO SO SO SO i .... ...... i Construction SO SO SO SO SI.785.600 $1,785,600 ii Contingency $0 $0 $0 SO S178,560 $178.560 Equipment/Othcr $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 ? . i TOTAL COST SO $0 $0 $0 S2,232,ooo $2,232,000 . I Potcntial Funding Sources: The constructiol ~~ some I A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific allrccmcnts I projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. [ , I t t [ I t c I t I I If .I I t E I: (e) -.y.-.,.:'.....'. L [ , t- [ t .. t J .. ( ~ I I I I E " II t r.. III c City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgruJ: Cireulotion (S_, Sipls and Bridges) SylleJll Ptoj<<:t Titl.: Gracie Separation @ Stole Strcet!Univ.rsity (SB) Submming Deportmtltl/(s}: Development Services Department (Engineering) Ptoj<<:t No.: ST-98 Proj<<:t Description: Constuct. grade separation at State Street/University. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by . number of sources. This portion represents the City'slhare of the total project. Justjliauon/Roquiremcnt for Project: Enhance safety by providing a vcrticle separation between rail road traffIC and vehicular traffIC. This project also improves operation of the intersection as stoppage of vehicular traffic will no longer be necessary. Consequences of Not Comploring Prq,jed: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Toul PROPOSED 2()()6-(}7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through IIll EXPENDITURES Build-out y..... IJesjgn/lnspcctionl Administration $0 50 $0 50 5256.800 5256.800 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 50 50 $0 $0 50 Construction $0 $0 $0 50 51.712,000 51.712,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 5171.200 Equipm<ntlOtbeJ' $0 $0 $0 50 50 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 50 52.140,000 (0) Potential Funding Sour~: . A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The constructio~i? some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. ~ P" ill t [ [ t ; I [ I ~ I I I Ii m E m E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail P1ojet:t Title: Grade Separllion @ HunlI Lane (58, Colton) P1oIJTU': Circulation (Streets, Sipal. and 8ridg..) Syllom SubmjlliD& Doptutment(s): Development Servicoo Department (Engineering) P1ojet:t No.: ST -99 ~jeer Description: Construct a grade separation at Hunts Lane. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by . number of lOurces. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Enhance safety by providing a verticle separation between rail road traffIC and vehicular traffIC. This projoc:t also improv.. operation of the intersection as stoppage of vchic:ulu traffic will no longer be necessary. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequencY' of routine delays. Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotAl PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 200N)!) 2009-10 through oJl EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $137,160 $137,160 Land Acquisition/Righr of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $914,400 $914,400 ContuJgency $0 $0 $0 $0 $91.440 $91.440 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.143,000 $1.143.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. dcvdopment impact fees. and specifiC agreements. projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. 140 The construction of some (,j . -.".- r- III [ t E [ E E I I I t .~ ; I I E E I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: Grade Separation @ Rancho Avenue Program: Cireulo1ion (SlrcelJ, Signal. and Bridge.) System Submitting Department(s): Development Service. Department (Engineering) Project No,: ST-HJO Project Description: Construct a grade separation over the existing rail road tracks. This project is cotlIidered of regional importance and is to be fman~ by . number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. JustificationlRequirCllJent for Pr~;ect: Traffic along Rancho Avenue backs up while the train goes by and requires substantial time to recover. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reduced mobility along with increased congestion and greater frequency of routine delays. Reference Document: P1'C!ject Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/0-11 TotII/ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 200N)9 2009-/0 throuah IIll EXPENDITURES Build-out y""" Desij!11/1nspectionl Administration SO $0 $0 $0 $281,880 $281,880 LaJJd Acquisition/Right of ",ay SO $0 $0 $0 SO SO Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,879,200 $1,879,200 COlJringency $0 SO SO $0 $187,920 $187,920 Equipment/Other SO $0 $0 SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 SO $0 $0 $2,349,000 $2,349,000 Potential Funding Sources: 141 A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific a~reemcnts. The construction of some rr'"'.le'cts hsted may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. (0) . . .,.1Illl>>: "" l.. c c [ c [ [ E t tr' .. .m I E E" [ t [ t t City of San Bernardino Library Facilities and Collection 142 ".. ! .. [ [ [ [ t [ E E . ~ I I I , ; [ t E l!~ ~'a~ III Q - I ~ ~ I ~ "l ~ ~ ..... Q ~ .~ ~ a .8 :; .,. ~ a: :; J:~ :~ ~:-:: !l ;; U ~ ,,~ ...'l; Q II t> .~ i .s G~~ I I ~ ;g ~ ~ .~ 1 !> .ll !>,5 -ll ~ ;J IS ;J ~ !> 'ij .1 ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ 0: ~ ] . t '5 .. 2 ~ ~ . . S 2 '5 .!! {l tl .!l. e ... 'oi ~ i ~ . - ... 1 ~ ,- S '0 1: I " . '6 ~ '! ~ E " 143 1; . '5' tt I~ 4( u c 9 ~ ~ "3 IL c5 ...J ...J iii - .!!l OJ '13 2i CIl 1;; o U od Q) '" c Q) > Gl a: ,.. ... t: t [ [ I . I E . t E I . m i I p.. , Ii [ [ t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgrtUlJ: Library Facilities and Collection Proj<ct Title: General Library Square FOOl Expansion Submirring Department(s): Public Library Ptc!;ect No.: LB-oI PfC!;ect Description: Acquisition of land and construction of a total of 27,509 square feet of library expansion in one or more locations in order to maintain pace with new development-generated residential poulation growth. Impact fees will f1lWlee approximately 16, 103 square feet of the: total 27,509 square feet. JustmcationlRequirement for Project: The proposed expansion will provide the square footage necessary to maintain the current ratio of floor space to residential patrons as is offered at this point in time. The cUrrcnl1evel of service standard is 0.41 square feet of library space por resident, while the Cily-ownoclllllDdard ia 0.23 square feet per rcaident. Should the library not be expandocl, the space per resident would drop by about 25" to about 0.30 square feet at build-out. The additional 27,509 square feet represents the amount of square feet necessary to maintain the current levels of service provided by the existing building space. Consequences of Not Completing Prq,;<<t: This proposed project docs not assume expansion of the current library or construction of a branch library. it merely represents the cost of the additional square footage necessary to maintain current levels. Additionally. it docs not reprcsent that the current 0.41 squarc feet pet resident as currently adequate or insufficient. mcrely a statement of thc actuaIstandard. Reference Document: None. Project Timing: The impact fee revenue would be collected over a long period of time. thus no specific time frame for the construction of the additional square feet is offered. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 EXPENDITURES Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO Construction SO SO Contingency SO SO Equipment/Other SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO 2010-11 2008-09 2009- JO through Build-out SO SO S531.3i4 SO SO S724,615 SO SO S3,542,563 SO SO S354,256 SO SO SO SO SO S5,152,818 ToUl all Years S3,542,563 Potentjal Funding Sources: General Fund, or if adopted. the proposed development impact fees.. 144 (e) ..., , ... [ t E t E t I I I I I I I I ; E t t City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projoct Title: Expoasion of Library Collcc:tion Prognm: Library Fscililiel and Collcc:tion Projoct No.: LB-m Submitting Dcpsrtmcnt(s): Public Library Project Description: Acquisition and processing of approximately 79,482 additional books or other items to increase the Public Library's collection in order to maintain pace with new residential home construction and occ:upancy. JustificationlRcquircment for Project: The proposed expansion will provide the additions to the collection of library -"items" necessary to maintain the current ratio of books to residential patrons as is offered at this point in time. The current level of service standard is 1.19 "items" per resident based upon 236,910 items and 199.803 potential patrons. Should the current collection of items not be expanded. the number of items per patron standerd would drop by shout 2Sl' to shout 0.89 books per person. The 79,842 .dditi~.1 books that could be acquired if the impact fees wu odoptcd, represents the additional collection items necessary to maintlin the current levels of service provided by the existing collection. Consequences of Not Completing Proicc;t: The proposed purchase of books/volumes does not represent that the current 1.19 books/resident as currently adequate or insufficient. merely a statement of the actual standard. RcfeTMCC DocumcJJt: None. Project Timing: The impact fee revenue would be collected over a long period of time. thus no specific time frame for the construction of the additional square feet is offered. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 EXPENDITURES Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 Land Acquisition/RighI of Way $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 20iD-1I TotJJl 2008-09 2009-iO through olJ Build-out Ycon $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5.083.041 $5,083.041 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5.083.041 $5.083,041 145 Potentia] FlJJlding Sources: General Fund, or if adopted. the proposed development impact fees. (e) .:.1'.1)....: r' III r .. E t t E ~ I I I I I I I I I ! I I E I'. , City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro}cct Tid.: Main Library Debt Sorvico Progrom: Libruy FacUilia and Colloclion Submitting DopartmM/(S): Publio Library Project No.: LB-03 Pro}cct Dc&cription: Make remaining payments on the Main library debt serviee schedule. JustifiauonlRoquirement for Project: The debt service payments must be made. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Default on the payment schedule is not an option. Reference Document: Debt Service Schedule. Pro.ioct Timing: None. 201o-11 ToW PROPOSED 2()(}6-(}7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Designllnspectionl Administration SO SO SO SO S5,351.265 $5,351.265 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO SO Contingency SO SO SO SO SO Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S5,351.265 Potentja) FUlJdiJJ~ Sources: 146 General Fund, or if adopted, the proposed development impact fees. (c) ". ... r ... L t I E I I E I I I I I I I E I I City of San Bernardino Public Use Facilities 147 ,.. III II" , II E t t I E - -~-:- . . . .... . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I I '. . .,.' . ..... .... ....'. .,..., "0 - Justification/Requirement for Project: The City has a public use facilities standard of 0.994 square feet per resident based upon the total 199,619 square foot dedicated to communily and recreation services for the existing 199,803 residents. To maintain that standard through General Plan build-out the City would need to construct an additional 66,691 square feet of community service or recreation center space for UIe by the fmal projected 266.897 plus population. I I I i I" J I I I I ; E I I . Project Tid., Verdemont Community Center Program: Public Use Facilities Suhmitting Department(s): Community Services Project No.: CC-oI I P~;ec' Description: Acquire land for and construct a 15.000 Community Center in the Vcrdcmont area. The City's existing standard of public: use space is 0.994 square foot per resident. This is based upon the inventory of 198,619 square feet of public use space for the City's 199,803 residcm.s (199,619/199,803 = 0.993). Based upon this existing standard and the potential for 67,094 additional residents at General Plan build-out, the City could adopt and impose impact fees that would COI1.It1'Uet an additiona166.691 square feet of public use space. The 66.691 additional square feet would maintain the 0.994 S.F. per resident standard. .... . . ..... Consequences of Not Completing Project: Without adding (something) to the City's inventory of space available for community groups of all sizes and needs, the standard of 0.994 square foot per person would drop to about 0.744 square foot per person and the existing facilities would have too many competing needs to meet the full demands of anyone group. Reference Document: None. Ii I I PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 I EXPENDITURES I Design/Inspection! AdmilUstration SO SO I Land Acquisition/Right of W.y SO SO COIJstruction SO SO I Contingency SO SO I Equipment/Other SO SO I TOTAL COST SO SO Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. I Toul , I Illl Years $495,000 I SO I I. r' S3,3OO,000 I S330,ooo I SO I $4,125,000 I I 149 I I..... ~_.... 201Q-ll 2008-09 2009-10 through Build-out SO SO $495,000 SO SO SO SO SO S3,3oo,000 SO SO S330,000 SO SO SO SO SO $4,125,000 Potential FunduJg Sources: General Fund revenues, Public Use Development Impact Fecs. miK.I'JI"'ncous state and federal grants. (e) . I ,.. I " ,.. .., ,. .. t t t I t I E I I .. I I E I ; I I I I I ! City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail p~i"t Tide: Dclmann Heights GyllllllSium ProgrtUD: Public Use Facilitics Submitting Dcpartment(s): Community Services Project No.: cc-02 Project Doscription: Construct a 7.000 square foot gymnasium a contiguous to the De1mann Heights Community Center. The City's eXisting standard of public: use space is 0.994 square foot par resident. This is baaed upon the inventory of 198,619 square feet of public use space for the City's 199,803 residents (199,619/199,803 = 0.993). Baaed upon this existing standard and the potential for 67,094 additional residents at General Plan build-out. the City could adopt and impose impact fees that would construct an additional 66,691 square feet of public use space. The 66,691 additional square feet would maintain the 0.994 S.F.pcr resident standard. Justification/Requirement for Project: The City has a public use facUities standard of 0.994 square feet par resident baaed upon the total 199,619 square fOOl dcdi<atcd to cOlDDlunity and recreation services for the existing 199,803 residents. To maintain that standard through General Plan build-out the City would need to construct an additional 66.691 square feet of community service or recreation center space for use by the fmal projected 266.897 plus population. ,Consequences of Not Completing Project: Without adding (something) to the City's inventory of spa.. available for <OlDDlunity groups of all sizes and needs, the standard of 0.994 square foot per person would drop to about 0.744 square foot per person and the existing facilities would have too many competing need. to meet the full demands of anyone group. Reference Document: None. p~;..t Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-QS EXPENDITURES Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO Construction SO SO Contingency $0 SO Equipment/Other SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO 2010-1/ Total 200S-09 2009- 10 through all Build-out Years SO SO S231 ,000 S231.ooo SO SO SO SO SO SO S 1,540.000 S1.54O,OOO SO SO SI54,ooo SI54,ooo SO SO SO SO SO SO S1.925,ooo SI,925,ooo Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues. Public Use Development Impact Fees, miscellaneous state and federal Jlrants. 150 (cj ". '~.2oalF',"''''.'''' ...1 , I I r .. fill III i E I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail PI"!ie<t Tide: Nicholson Community Center Submitting Deputment(.): Community Services Prognm: Public: Uoe FacUiti.. Project No.: CC-Q3 pl"!;ecr Description: COIlIlruct a 7,000 "Iuart: fool gylDlUllium a contiguous to the Nic:bo1son Community Center. The City', exiltin& otandard of public: uoe spoce is 0.994 square foot par resident. This is baoed UpaD the inventory of 198,619 "Iuart: f... of public: uoe space for the City., 199,803 residents (199.619/199.803 = 0.993). Baoed UpaD this existing sundard and the potential for 67,094 additional r..id.... at General Plan buUd-out, the City could adopt and impose impact fees that would construct an additiona166,691 square fGet of public: use space. The 66,691 additional square feet would maintain the 0.994 S.F. per resident standard. JustifiationlRcquirelllcnt for Project: The City has a public use facilities sundard of 0.994 "Iuart: f... par resident baoed upon the total 199,619 "Iuare foot dedicated to community and recreation servic:es for the existing 199,803 resid..... To maintain that otandard through General Plan build-out the City would need to construct an additional 66.691 square feet of community service or recreation c:enter space for use by the fmal projected 266,897 pIUI population. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Without adding (something) to the City' 5 inventory of space available for community groups of all sizcs and needs. the standard of 0.994 squuc foot per person would drop to about 0.744 square foot per person and the existing facUities would have too many competing needs to moet the full demands of anyone group. Reference Document: None. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 EXPENDITURES Design/Inspection/ AdmJnjstntion SO SO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO COlJstruction SO SO Contingency SO SO Equipment/Other SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO Project Timing: The timing or schoduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition describod herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 201Q-ll ToW 2008-09 2009-10 rhrough all Build-out Years SO SO S231,000 S231,000 SO SO SO SO SO SO : SI.540,ooo S 1,540,000 SO SO SI54,OOO SI54,OOO SO $0 SO SO SO SO S 1,925 ,000 SI,925,OOO Potential Funcfing Sourc..: General Fund revenues, Public Use Development Impact Fees. miscellaneous state and federal ~rants. 151 (01 '" ."".2IIOI\/'l(:,. , j . ".. III '" .. t E t I E I I I I I I I I I I I I ., City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: Construct Additional Public Uso Space: ProgrtlJ1J: Public Uso Faclliliol Sub",;lting DopartmMt(s): Community Services Project No.: CC-04 Pr~jt:ct Description: The City's existing standard of public uso space: i.s 0.994 square foot per rcaidoat. Tbia i.s basocI upon the inventory of 198,619 square feet of public uso space: for the City's 199,803 rcaiclcnta (199,619/199,803 = 0.993). Buod upon thia cxialinI standard and the poteatial for 67,094 additional rcsidCllls at General Plan bulld-out, the City could adopt and imposo impact f... that would construct an additional 66,691 square feel of public uso space. The 66,691 additional square feel would IIl8inmin tho 0.994 S.F. per rcsident standard. Justification/Requirement for Project: The City has a public uso facUities standard of 0.994 square feet per rcaidOlll basod upon the total 199,619 square foot dedicated to co_unity and recreation servicca for the eJtisting 199,803 rcaidCllta. To maintain that standard through General Plan bulld-out the City would nood to construct an additional 66,691 square feet of co_unity service or recreation _ space for use by the fUllll projcctod 266,897 plua population. ConSoqUMC'" of Not CompJoting Project: Without adding (something) to the City's inventory of space available for community groups of all sizes and needs, the standard of 0.994 square foot per person would drop to about 0'.744 square foot per person and the existing facilities would have too many competing needs to IDClCt the full demands of anyone group. Reference Document: None. Projoct Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital ouday acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the oOBuild-outM column. 2010-1/ TouJ PROPOSED 2006-C7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through .n EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Dosign/lnspcctionl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,243,803 $1,243,803 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 SO $0 S8,292,020 S8,292,020 Contingency $0 $0 SO SO S829,202 S829,202 Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO SO SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 SIO,365.025 $10,365,025 Potential Funding Sources: 152 General Fund revenues, Public Use Development Impact Fees, miscellaneous state and federal grants. (c) -",.-' ...... "" . ,. ... E t I I I I I I I I I I E ; I I I City of San Bernardino Aquatics Facilities 153 fI1'4. .. t - il 0- il M 8 co - '" l~~ .. ~ .. '" ;: al ::j ::i <( E ~l('; () ,., III <: .2 - .!!! t :; U- S I c:::. - I ~ I ~ I I ~ '" ~ I ~ . ~ ~ ~ " '" I <5 .2 ~ "- I c:::. ~ ~ ~ S .2 '5 I .'!! ,!l . u .~ a I '" . ~ ~ . I . '" ~ 1 [ . () E s c; ...i ~ ...i i .; - E Q .!!1 ~J ai . '0 .. ll.; II c; Q) c. !:~ ~ ~ en .~ I ~ - ,.... " U) ~ u ~ ~ 0 ~ u l'J ! all "'"' ... .~ I Q .ll g .. 0 Q) Q .. :ct '" .~ ~ l>' C . 154 <: U 1l: ",- Q) > .. a: I ".. .. '" .. t E I I I I t I I I II .\ I I E I I i I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Coutruct Water PooII A1tra<tion PrognuD: Aquatics FacUitico Submitting Departmont(s}: Parks. Recreation and Community Services Project No.: AQ-{ll P~;ect Description: The City's existing standard of pool surface space is 0.309 square fool per reaideDt, This is bued upon the provision of 61 ,690 square feet of pool surface space for the City's 199,803 rcoid..... (61,690/199,803 = 0,3(9). Based upon this existing standard and the potentW for 67.094 additional residents at General Plan build-out, the City could adopt and impose impact fees that would COUlI'uc/ an additional 20,732 square feel of pool surface space. The addition of 20,732 square feel would be adequate for a SO meter (by 2S yard) competition pool (12,188 square feel of surface) and a 30 yard by 30 yard general purpose pool (8,100 square feet) or for perspective, it could be used to construct three pools the size of the one at the Mills aquatic center. Justification/Requirement for Prq,ject: The 20.732 additional pool surface square feet would maintain the 0.309 square fcct of pool surface per resident standard. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Without adding to the City's inventory of pool space available for its rosideau, the standard of 0.309 square foot per person would drop 2S1I to about 0.231 square foot per person and the existing facilities would become morc crowded and the experience would be decreased in value. Reference DocUlllcnt: Staff planning. Prop:t Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all projcct cost default to the "Build-outM column. 20/0-11 PROPOSED 2006-{)7 2()()7-{)S 200S-<J9 2009- iO through EXPENDiTURES Build-out IJoojgnlInspeetion/ .AdmblUt1otion SO SO SO $0 $386.984 Land Acquisition/R' r of Way $0 SO SO $0 SO Construction $0 $0 SO SO $2,579,890 Contingency $0 SO $0 $0 $257,989 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 $3,224,863 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Aquatics Program Development Impact Fees. miscellaneous state and federal grants. (e) TotAl all Y041lI $386,984 SO $2,579,890 $257,989 SO $3,224,863 155 -.,.-.... ... .. t I t- I I I I I I I I I I II ;! I I II ;1 E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Progn11J: Aquatics Faci1ilioo P"!joct Title: ConslrUCl Locker/ Ad_alion Building Submitting Deportment(s): Parks. Recreation and Community Services Project No.: AQ-02 Pl'C!jcct Description: The City's existing standard of poollocker/maintenanc. building space is 0.484 square foot per resident. This is baaed upon the provision of 2.563 square fcct of pool building space for the City's 5,300 residents (2,563/5,300 = 0.484). Baaed upon this .xisting standard ODd the potential for 67,094 additional residents at Gen.ral Plan build-out, the City could adopt ODd impose impact fees that would construct an additional 8.118 square feet of pool building space. Justincation/Rcquin:mcnt for Prq;ect: Th. 8.118 additional pool building square fcct would maintain the 0.121 of building square feet per resident standard. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Without adding to the City's inventory of locker room building available for its rClidcnts, the standard of 0.121 square foot per person would drop 25% to about 0.090 square foot per penon and the existing facilities would become more crowded and the ex.perience would be decrcucd in value. R~ft:rcnce Document: Staff planning. Project Timing: The timing of the capital construction or acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project costl default to the "Build-out" column. All costs arc lit nominal. or current dollar value. 20Jo-/J PROPOSED 2(}()6-o7 2(J()7-(J8 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/inspectionl Administration SO $0 $0 $0 $240,968 Land AcquisjtionlRighr of Way $0 SO SO $0 $0 COllsttuction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.606,455 Contingt:ncy $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,646 Equipmt:nt/Othet SO SO SO $0 SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 $2,008,069 Potentia} Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Aquatics Program Development Impact Fees, miJc:ellancous state and federal grants. (,) Totlli .n Yean $240,968 SO $1.606,455 $160,646 SO $2,008,069 156 ...'.-'. . ".".,..... ~.2lll6'. ,.. .. ,. Ia C t I I Ii I I I ; I I I I ; I!.. II I t City of San Bernardino Parkland Acquisition and Facilities Improvements 157 ... III I"l ... ; ~.., Ii i I [ I I E r a I I I I i E I I I E City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro.iect Title: Construct Six 5.0 As:fC Neighborhood Parks Program: ParI< II1d Open Space Land Acquisition and DeveloplllClll Submitting Deportment(s): Community Services Department Project No.: PK-Ql Project Description: Acquire land for/develop six 5.0 acre neighborhood parks dcsigned to meet neighborhood acceu to youth and adults for nearby non-programmed sports and activity use. Examples of improvements would include a turfed sports field. a small seale baseball backstop for "pick-up" play. a concrete basketball court, 8 small playground climbing apparatus, a drinking fountain. small restroom, and pienic tables and benches. Project design. project administration and inspection costs arc included in the $340,945 per acre construction cost. Land COlts are included at $10.00 per square foot. JustiJ1C8tionlRcquUcI1Jt:lJt for Project: A neighborhood park. according to the National Parks and Rccieation Association. is "Easily ac:ccssablc to neighborhood populatioJi- geographically centered with safe walking and bike accesll. May be developed as a school-patk facUity. .. There are no speciflC plans Cor the possible combinations of parks (e.g. neighborhood, community or sports parks) to be configured from the 200 acres of parks that could be financed by a park development impact fees. Such plans would be All park improvements must meet the American with Disabilities Act requirements of access for all. Consequences of Not Completing Pr~jcl;t: Demands for local and acessable park facilities would go unmct for this area. Reference Document: None, the future needs arc merely based upon the standards representing Quimby Act provisions and uscrs statrsbes. Project Timing: Thc timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in thc scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 201Q-ll TouJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-1J9 2009-10 througb all EXPENDITURES Build-out y...... Design/Inspection! Administration SO SO SO SO S2.508.846 S2,508,846 Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO SI3.068.ooo S13.068,OOO Construction SO SO SO SO S6.432,942 S6,432,942 Contingency SO SO SO SO S1.286,586 S 1.286,586 Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO S23.296.374 S23,296.374 Potential Funding Sources: 159 Park Impact Fees, Quimby Fees. General Fund contributions, State Park grants and occasional federal grants (c) . '.'_::r'::':':;:::;;~::_::r:?f:::::::-:;:::::::;' ..,w.... - .. ,. a. t ; i I i E I I I E I I I ; E E E I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: conitruct Seven 10.0 Acre Passive Community Parks Program: Part and Open SI'"" Land Acquioition and Development Submitting Departmmt(s): Community Services Department Projoct No.: PK -02 P~;cct Description: Acquire land for/develop JeVCD 10.0 acre community parks designed to mocl area-wide passive needs for nearby non-programrned sports, activity and picnicing U5C. Community parks are intended to meet passive uses for families and groups. Improvements would inc:lude informal sportsficlds. play areas with playground apparatus. restrooms, numerous picnic: tables a number of them under shade structures, barbcques. benches and non-lighted tennis. basketbalJ and volleyball courts. Passive parks may ilia have a concrete stage, bandshcll or a large gazebo. There would also be sidewalks, security lighting and park signage. Project design. project administration and inspection costs arc included in the 5340,945 per acre construction cost. Land costs are included at $10.00 per square foot. JusrIDestion/Rcquiremcnt for Project: A community park. according to the National Parks and Recreation Association as an .. Area of diverse environmental quality. May includc areas suited for intense recreational facilities. such as atheletiec complcxCl, largc swimming pools. May be an area of natural quality fot outdoor recreation, such as walking. viewing, sitting, picknicing. May be any combination of the above. depending upon sitc suitability and community need. There are no specific plans for the possible combinations of parb: (e.g. neighborhood, community or sportS parks) to be configured from the 200 acres of parks that could be fmanced by park development impact fees. Such plans would be All park improvements must meet the American with Disabilities Act requirements of access for all. CONsequences of Not Completing Project: The City currently maintains a 2.69 acres per 1,000 person standard. 1m light of the addition of 12,354 detached homes and 8,599 attached homes, additional parks will need to be constructed. There are no specific plans for the possible 200 acres of parks that couldbe fmanccd by park impact fees. Failure to maintain existing park acres will ultimately decrease the usage and viability of the parks reducing the &eeC$sability of recreational activities. Reference Document; None, the future needs are merely based upon the standards representing Quimby Act provisions and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "BuUd-out" column. 20J()-1l PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-JO through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/lnspection/ AdllJinjstn.tion SO SO $0 SO S5.853.974 . Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO . soi S30,492.ooo CO/1struction SO SO SO $0 . $15.010.198 Contingency $0 $0 SO $0 $3,002.041 Equipment/Other SO $0 SO $0 SO TOTAL COST SO $0 SO SO $54,358.213 ToW all y...,.. S5,853.974 S30,492.OOO SI5.010,198 $3,002,041 $0 $54,358,213 PotMtial Funding Sources: Park. Impact Fees. Quimby Fees. General Fund contributions, State Park grants and occasional federal ~rants 160 I I ... (e) -.,.:lIlO6.' "" lIII t , I ; I I I I I I I I I I E I I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Construct Four 25.0 Al:re Al:tive (sports) Communiry Parks Progrom: Park and Opcrl Space Land Al:quisition and DevdoplllOlll Submitting Department(s): Community Services Department Project No.: PK-03 ~jccr Description: Acquire land for/develop four 25.0 acre sports parks designed. to meet area-wide active needs for nearby programmed sports. activity and minor picnicing U5C. Sports parks arc intended to meet active uses for associations and large groups. Improvements would include lighted baseboll and softboll fields. lighted soec:c:r/footboll fidds. Other improve_ rypicaIly irldude groups fo five or six full-sized b_oll courts and a number of lighted tennis courts. Project design, project admin.i.Jtration and inspection costs are -included in the $340.945 per acre construction cost. Land costs arc included at $10.00 per square foot. JustiBCll.tjon/Requircl1JClIt for Prqject: A community park. according to the National Parks and Recreation Association as an "Area of diverse environmental quality. May include areas suited for intense recreational facilities. such as athe1etice complexes, large swimming pools. May be an area. of natural quality for outdoor recreation, such as walking. viewing, sitting, picknicing. May be any combination of the above, depending upon site suitability and community need. There ara no spe<ifl< plans for the possible combinations of parks (a.l. neighborhood, community or sports parks) to be configured from the 200 acres of parks that could be fmanced by park development impact fees. Such plans would be All park improvemca.tI must meet the American with Disabilities Act requirements of access for all. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Tha City currantly maintains a 2.69 ac:res per 1.000 person standard. 1m light oftha addition of 12.354 datachad hom.. and 8.599 attac:hed homes. additional parks will need to be constructed. There arc no specific plans for the possible 200 acres of parks that couldbe fmanccd by park impact fees. Failure to maintain existing park acres will ultimately decrease the usage and viability of the parks reducing the acccssability of recreational activities. ToW III Yean Reference Document: None, the future needs are merely based upon the standards representing Quimby Act provisions and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-JO EXPENDITURES Design/lnspection/ Admuustrstjon SO SO SO SO Land Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO SO Contingency SO SO SO SO Equipment/Other SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO SO 20JD-ll througb Build-out S8.362.828 $43.560,000 S21.443.144 $4.288.628 SO S77.654.600 PotentisJ Funding Sources: I i (,~arl< Impact Faas. QUImby Faas, Ganeral Fund conlnbul1ons, State Park grants and occaSIOnal fadaral grants S8,362.828 543.560.000 S21.443.144 54.288.628 SO S77.654.600 161 r }.lIlIl6 .... I i C) I ... .. ,.. k t I i I I E I I I i I I, ;1 ! i , I I City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pro,ject Title: Miscellanea... Park Improvemcnu Progrom: Park and Open Spocc Land Acquisition and Dcvelopmcnl Submitting Dcpurmcnt(.): Community Services Department Project No.: PK -()4 Project Description: Improvements could include. but would not be limited to: basketball courts. playground climbing apparatus, drinking fountains. restroom. picnic tables, barbcques and bonches, basketball courts, playground climbing apparatuJ, drinking Colllltains, restrooms, picnic: tables, barbcques and benches. Park construction coats are estimated at $3S7.437/acre for the 39.5 acres of mixed active/passive parkland development. Project design. project administration and inspection com are included in the 5340,945 per acre construction cost. Land costs IlrC included at $10.00 per square foot. Justification/Requirement for Project: Some of the 537.3 acres of existing parks are in need of additional (acilia to meet local needs that could not have been anticipated at the time the park was designed and constructed. Additionally, changes in the demographics of the area surrounding the various parks may have also changed the way the park is used or could allow the park to reach fuller use. All park improvements must meet the American with Disabilities Act requirements of aceesa for all. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The City currently maintains a 2.69 acres per 1,000 person standard, 1m light of the addition of 12,354 detached homes and 8,599 allachad homes, additional parks will need to be constructed. There are no speciflC plans for the possible 200 acres of parks that couldbe rmanc:cd by park impact fees. Failure to maintain existing park acres will ultimately decrease the usage and viability of the parks reducing the acc:essabUity of recreational activities. Reference Document: None, the future needs are merely based upon the standards representing Quimby Act provisions and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not inc:1uded in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Tot.J PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009- 10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Dcslgnlhupcction/ Admmistntion $0 $0 SO SO Sloo,ooo Sloo,ooo Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO SO SO SO $0 Construction SO SO $0 $0 $800,000 S8OO,OOO Contingency SO $0 $0 SO $100,000 Sloo,ooo Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: 162 Park Impact Fees, Quimby Fees, General Fund contributions, State Park grants and occasional federal grants (oj -.,..2lICl6.. "" ~ t E E t I i I I I I I . I . I I I I (0) City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: OJlCll Space: Acquisition (159.4 acres) Program: Park and Open Space: Land Acquisition and Devclopmem Project No.: PK -os Submitting Department(s): Community Servic:c5 Department P~i<<t Description: Acquire approximately 169.5 &Cres of open space in order to maintain the existing ratio of open space to developed space within the City's limits. The open space land could be in either large tracts or linear strips that could be used to conncc:t the City's many tTaUs. JustificotjonJRoquiremcnt for Project: The construction of new homes, condominiums, apartments and businC5SC5 will eliminate what arc now open spaces. The impact fee. if adopted and impoacd uniformly, would ennble the City to acquire 169.5 acres of open space at approximately $1.00 per square fOOl. There arc no costs for development of the open space but natural trails and minimal improvementl1ike trailheads could be expected. Consequences of Not Completing Prqicct: Open spaec would not be acquired and perhaps many of the existing trails could not be connected. Reference Document: None, the future necxls are merely based upon the standards representing current space and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement. thus all project cost default to the HBuild-out" column. 2010-// PROPOSED 2~7 2007-08 2008-()9 2009-10 through EXPENDfTURES BuUd-out DcsignlImpcctionJ AtimbJbtration $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Land Acqui.;tjon/Right of W.y $0 SO SO SO $4,015,018 Construction $0 SO $0 SO $0 Contingency SO $0 $0 SO $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 SO $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO SO $4,015,018 Total all Years $0 $4,015,018 $0 $0 $0 $4,015,018 Potential Funding Sources: Park Impact Fees, Quimby Fees, GeDeral Fund contributions, S_ Park grants and occasional federal grants 163 - ,.. C L [ [ ~ E [ [ E E E I I E I I I I END OF PLAN 164