HomeMy WebLinkAbout48-Planning and Building
- CITY OF SAN BEIOARDINO - REQUESOOR COUNCIL ACTION
Dept: Planning & Building Services
Subject: CalMat Cajon Creek Specific P.lan
No. 90-01, GPA No. 91-18, DCA No. 92-06,
CUP No. 91-31/Reclamation Plan and
Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108.
Mayor & Common Council meeting of 5/10/9
'From: Al Boughey, Director
Date: April 22, 1993
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
06/02/89 -- The Mayor and Common Council adopted the General Plan and the land
use designations on the 1,392 acre and site became a mix of IE,
Industrial Extractive, IH, Industrial Heavy and PFC, Public Flood
Control.
05/03/91 -- The Mayor and Common Council adopted the Development Code
(effective on June 3, 1991) which implements the General Plan
land use designations and related policies.
Recommended motion:
That the public hearing be closed and the resolution be adopted that certifies
the EIR, adopts Findings and Statements of Overriding Consideration, approves
the Mitigation Monitoring Program, approves the General Plan Amendment No. 91-18
to change the land use designation to SP, approves the Specific Plan No. 90-01
to establish land use districts, permitted uses, development standards and
design guidelines for the CalMat Cajon Creek Project and that the first
reading be waived and that the proposed ordinance which approves Development
Code Amendment No. 92-06 to add Specific Plan No. 90-01 to the Development
Code be laid over for adoption, and to approve the Co itional Use Permit
No. 91-31/Reclamation Plan and the Tentative I a Nos. 14106, 14107 and
14108.
Contact person: Al Boullhey
Phone:
5357
Supponingdataattached: Staff Report, Resolution and Ward:
Ordinance
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: S 8 7 5 .00
Source: (Acct. No.1 772-171-24515
5 and 6
Acct. Descri tion Fish and
for EIR
Finance:
Fees
Council Notes:
.-
75-0262
Agenda Item No.7'i
CITY OF SAN BERORDINO - REQUEST QJR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
::
8UBJECT: SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-01, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-
18, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 92-06, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 91-31, PARCEL MAP NOS. 14106, 14107 AND 14108
RBOUl!:8'.r/LOCA'.r:l:OIl -~1
-"-.
The applicant requests approval of Specific Plan No. 90-01 which \1
proposes to establish land use districts, permitted uses, I'
development standards and, d;esiqn quidelines for the CalMat Cajon il
Creek Project. The Spec1f1c Plan and the other related project II,
applications (referenced above) would provide for the establishment Ii)'
of mineral extractive, heavy industrial, light industrial and open,
space uses with mining-related interim us_ on the site. The 1\ I
project is phased with ultimate build-out anticipated at 25 years I.,
for the light and heavy industrial us_. I i
1,1
T'..te project site, consisting of 1,392 acres of land, is located on. i~iI
the west side of Cajon Boulevard generally between Devore Road and i
the unincorporated community of Muscoy. __" /
?>
NOTE: Descriptive geographical information on the site and the--
surrounding area is contained in the Site And Area Characteristics
section of the June 16, 1992 Planning commission Staff Report
(Attachment 3-C).
DY :l:88Ul!:8
The key issues of the project are identified as follows:
The project Envirolllllel1tal Xmpact Report (EIR) indicates
that the project will result in siqnificant impacts to
air quality, bioloqical resourc_ and land use that
cannot be mitigated to below a level of siqnificance.
The EIR also indicates that the project will result in
cumulative siqnificant impacts to air quality relating to
fuel combustion emissions (vehicular and other sources)
and PH-10 levels and incremental impediment of the
ultimate attainment of clean air standards in the South
Coast Air Basin.
Public testimony and concerns raised by the City
Attorney's Office at June 16, 1992 Planning Commission
S.0264
o
o
Ca1Jla~ cajoD Creek proje,c~
specific Plan BO. 10-01 (.~ al)
Kayor and ComaoD COUDcil .e.~iDq of
Kay 10, 1113
paqe 2
Meetinq resulted in an independent review of the air
quality, surface hydroloqy, bioloqy and visual resources
sections of the EIR.
The results of the independent review (contained in the
Addendum to the Final EIR) are that the conclusions of
the EIR (as they relate to the four study topics) are not
chanqed.
Findinqs and statements of OVerriding Consideration have
been prepared for each siqnificant unavoidable adverse or
siqnificant unavoidable cumulative impact for the
approval and adoption of the C&lMat cajon creek Project
(all applications). (Refer to Exhibit B of Attachment 1)
Since the February 16, 1993 Planninq commission meetinq,
the City has received letters from four County of San
Bernardinodepartments/aqencies(theTransportation\Flood.
Control Department, Department of Environmental Health
Services, Reqional Parks Department and Glen Helen
Blockbuster Amphitheater Entertainment corporation) which
outlined some specific concerns about the project.
(Refer to Comments ReceiVed)
Persons testifyinq at the public hearinq on February 16,
1993 expressed concern that the mininq projects proposed
for the site would result in the spread of Valley Fever.
(Refer to Comments Received)
Durinq the public hearinq portion of the February 16,
1993 planninq commission Meetinq, residents voiced their
concerns about potential traffic impacts from rock trucks
to C<rans facilities and school buses and potential
cumula~ive traffic impacts from the- project, the Glen
Helen Reqional Park Amphitheater and other projects in
the area. (Refer to Comments Received)
Based on the public testimony, the Planninq Commission
recommended that the Mayor and Common Council resolve the
issues related to traffic prior to Certification of the
EIR, adoption of the Resolution and the ordinance and
approval of the project. (Refer to comments Received)
.-
--
o
o
celM.~ CajoD Creek proje~~
speciria Plan Bo. 90-01 (e~ al)
Bayor and ComaoD Counail Bee~iDq or
Bay 10, 1993
paqe 3
DIVl:llOBIIB1I'.rn DBTBRIll:DTl:OB
An EIR was prepared to address Specific Plan No. 90-01, General
Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code Amendment No. 92-06,
Conditional Ose Permit No. 91-31/Reclamation Plan and Parcel Nap
Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108. Based on puDlic testimony and
concerns raised by the city Attorney's Of rice, an independent
review was conducted on the air quality, biology, surface hydrology
and visual resources analyses in the Em. The review resulted in
an Addendum to the Final Em which supports the conclusions in the
EIR (as they relate to the environmental topics specified). The
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Proqram lists the mitigation
measures identified in the EIR and assigns the responsibility for
timing and implementation. Findings and Statements of overriding
Consideration were prepared as requi~ by CEQA to substantiate
that the benefits of the project outweigh the significant and
cumulative impacts.
Please refer to the analysis~ attachments and exhibits contained in
the Planning commission Staff Reports for the February 16, 1993 and
June 16, 1992 meetings, Attachments 3-A and 3-C, respectively.
COIIIIDI'I'S UCZ:IVBD
The written and verbal comments received up to the February 16,
1993 Planning CD1DIIIission Meeting are considered to have been
addressed in the Addendum to the Final Em and in the Planning
CD1DIIIission Staff Report for that meeting (F.Yhihit A-4 of Attachment
1) . In addition, the majority of concerns discussed at the
February 16, 1993 meeting and in correspondence received since that
date are essentially the same issu_. However, some specific
concerns related to air quality, traffic, hydrology and geology
require explanation and/or clarification in the pu})lic and
administrative records. (Copies of corr~ndence are contained in
Attachment F to Attachment 3-C and in AttacblRent 5-8)
Air QUality
During the puDlic hearing portion of the February 16, 1993 Planning
CD1DIIIission meeting, individuals expressed their concern that the
mining projects on the site will r_ult in the spr_d of Valley
Fever. The applicant and his air quality consultant have evaluated
this issue and prepared responses which outline their findings
(Attachments 8-A and 8-C). The bacteria responsible for this
disease exists in the humus layer of soil which comprises about the
o 0
CalXat cajOD Creek Project
8peci~ic P1aD Bo. '0-01 (et all
_yor aD4 co.aoD COWlci1 BeetiDq or
_y 10, 1"3
paqe ..
top 4 incbes of the soil. Any disturbance of the soil (i.e.,
qardeninq, farminq or qrading) will release the bacteria into the
air. Valley Fever is not considered to be an issue for this
project because natives and lonqtime residents of southern and
central california qenerally are not affected by the disease.
Please note that the City's air quality consultant indicated to
staff at the February 16, 1993 Planninq COIIIIIIission Meetinq that be
did not feel that Valley Fever is an issue for this project.
The applicant bas also prepared a sebematic of the windbreaks that
will be placed around the aggreqate processing plant site in
Planninq Area H as requested by staff. (Refer to Attachment 8-B)
~r.~~ic
The issues related to traffic focus on potential impacts to
caltrans racilities and sebool buses frolll rock trucks and potential
cumulative tra~fic impacts frolll the project, the Glen Helen
Reqional Park AIIIpbith_ter and other projects in the area. Tbese
concerns were expressed durinq the public bearinq portion the
February 16, 1993 Planninq cOIIIIIIission meetinq and in two letters
received frolll the County of San BernardI'm) Reqional Parks
Department and the Glen Helen Blockbuster Allpbitheater
Entertainment Corporation (see Attachment 5-B).
The Traf~ic study contained in the EIR considered cumulative
impacts byinc1udinq a 5 percent (compounded) annual qrowtb rate
wbich was factored into the projections for future traffic volUDIes.
The 5 percent (cOlllpounded) annual growth rate is 1II0re than adequate
to address cumulative traffic impacts because the growth rate for
the City averaqes between 2 and 3 percent, annually. Followinq the
February 16, 1993 Planninq c018lllission Meetinq, the City's Traffic
Enqineer reevaluated the trarfic and circulation section in the "EIR
(and the Tra~fic Study in the Technical Appendices) and determined
that the potential cumulative impacts to traffic have been
adequately addressed. Planninq and Enqineerinq staff discussed the
potential cumulative impacts frolll the project and Amphitheater
traffic volUDIes and determined that the bours of operation for the
two respective projects would not result in any con~licts.
To further address these concerns, the applicant submitted
responses to the two letters (referenced above) wbich are contained
in Attachment 7-A throuqb 7-C. A copy of the response was
forwarded to the Reqional Parks Department. A m_ting with the
o
o
~J..t Cajon Creek Proje~t
Specific Plan Ro. '0-01 'Cet al)
Kayor and Comaon COUDcil xeetinq of
Kay 10, 1"3
paqe 5
::
Regional Parks Department and the Amphitheater Entertainment
Corporation was held on April 16, 1993. The purpose of the meeting
was to alleviate the concerns regarding cumulative traffic impacts
through a discussion of the analyses from the Traffic Analysis
Section of the CalJlat Cajon Creek Project ErR, the Initial Study
prepared for the Amphitheater expansion project and the information
contained in the applicant's response. All of the concerns were
discussed and identified as ))eing addressed in the CalJlat EIR.
Certain requests that were outlined in the Reqional Parks
Department letter were deferred for consideration as part of the
lease agre_ent lletween the calMat Company and the County of San
Bernardino Transportation/Flood COntrol Department. (The lea_
agre_ent will allow Calmat Company to use approximately 180 acres
of County owned land located in Planning Area P for mininq.)
Traffic impacts to caltrans facilities were addressed in the Final
Eir (Response to Comments). caltrans sutlaitted comments during the
Notice of Completion 45 day pU))lic review period for the DErR which
outlined their concerns. Followinq their review of the respons_
in the Final ErR, caltrans staff contacted the City and indicated
that they still had dou))ts a))out traffic projections that covered
a 25 year project ))uildout period. Throuqh further discussions
lletween City staff, Caltrans staff and the applicant, it was
determined that an additional mitiqation -.sure would lle imposed
on the project. The n_ mitiqation _sure requires that an
updated traffic stu~y lle completed to ass_s the impacts at the I-
215/Palm Avenue and I-215/Devore Road interchanqes prior to
approval of any parcel maps or developments that would cause the
projected trip qeneration (for the project) to exceed 10,000
averaqe daily trips (ACT). 10,000 ACTs is approximately balf of
))uildout.
Related to this issue, there was a concern raised at the Planninq
commission meetinq reqardinq deferrinq ntiqation measures to a
future date ))ased on traffic trips qenerated. The mitiqation
measures are not deferred, wt are required throuqhout development
of the project. The purpose of requirinq an updated freeway
traffic study when the ACTs reach 10,000 is to ensure that the
projections, and existinq mitiqation ~, remain valid over
time. This is included as a COndition of Appxoval for SP No. 90-01
and has lleen modified to lle more specific (Condition No. 15).
(Refer to Attaclment 9-A, conditions of Approval for SP No. 90-01)
All projects within the Specific Plan ar_ will ))e su))ject to CEQA
review. Each project willlle reviewed to ensure that the projected
traffic is within the scope addressed in the ErR. When projected
.-
o
o
CalHat cajon CreeJt project
speciric Plan .0. 90-01'Cet al)
Kayor and Common COUDci1 ..eting or
Kay 10, 1993
Page ,
traffic reaches the 10,000 ADT mark, the updated freeway traffic
study will be required. If, based on the updated freeway traffic
study, it is determined that new, additional or modified mitiqation
measures are required, the EIR (and MMRP) would have to De amended
to reflect those chanqes prior to development continuinq.
.
The concern reqardinq potential conflicts between project traffic
(rock trucks) and school buses has been resolved throuqh a revision
to Condition of Approval No. 34 (CUP No. 91-31). That Condition
requires that the applicant submit a rock truck routinq plan to the
Planninq Division and the Public Works Department for review and
approval prior to commencement of mininq. 'l'bis condition has been
revised to require that all affected aqencies revi_ the rock truck
routinq plan. This will enable the San Bernardino city Unified
School District to participate in the revi_ process, identify any
areas where rock trucks and school buses could CClII8 into conflict
and suqqest alternatives to the rock truck routinq plan. Another
condition has been added that will require the City to revi_ all
proposed liqht and heavy industrial uses in the SPecific Plan area
to determine the need for truck routinq plans. When truck routinq
plans are required, they will De reviewed by the City Departments
specified and all affected aqencies.
Byclroloqy
On February 16, 1993, the County of San Bernardino Flood Control
District submitted a letter of concern to the City. eopi_ of the
letter were distributed to the Planninq cOJIIIIission at the m_tinq.
Of major concern to Flood Control District ia the potential of the
project to result in upstream and downstream erosion (headcuttinq).
It was stated to the planninq Commission that hydrology studies
(Redlined Mininq Plan and BEC-2) _re prepared for the project and
evaluated in the EIR. These studies were in turn revi.-d by the
City'S Consultant Team durinq the independent revi_ ,aee
Attachment 1, Exhibit A-4, Addendum to the Final EIR). :In
addition, the project haBlIIitiqation which requires that rurtb.er
hydrology studies be completed prior to :aininq. COndition of
Approval No. 37 (CUP No. 91-31) requires that the instream mininq
project De monitored yearly for upstream and downstream erosion
(headcuttinq). The Condition further requires the applicant to
submit the results of the monitorinq to the city as part of the
annual reportinq for compliance with IIIIRP and conditions of
Approval. :If upstream erosion (headcutting) is found, the
applicant is required to take any corrective actions as may be
o
o
CalKa~ CajoD Creek projeo~
Speci~io Plan Jlo. 90-01 '(e~ al)
Kayor and COmaoD COWloil Jlee~iDq of
Kay 10, 1993
paqe 7
required by the city and/or the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District.
In a telephone conversation, a
representative indicated that the
involved in the review process for
mininq projects. Planninq staf~
certainly would be routed project
comment.
Flood Control District
District would like to be
site Plan approvals for the
a~firmed that the District
plans for their review and
Geology
On February 16, 1993, a letter was also received from the County o~
San Bernardino Department of Environmental Health Services (DEBS)
and copies o~ the letter were distributed to the Planninq
commission at the meetinq. The DEBS concerns focused on the
potential for land~ill qas (from the county'. cajon Boulevard
Land~ill) to miqrate onto the project site. This issue was raised
early on durinq the screencheck review of the ErR by the Re~use
Division of ciey's Public Services Department. It was aCJllin raised
by the california Inteqrated Waste llanaq_ent Board durinq the
Notice o~ Completion 45 day public review period for the DErR and
as a result, is addressed in the Final ErR (Response to COmments).
The response in the Final Em cites a provision of State law which
specifies that the Rsite ownerR o~ a waste disposal site is
responsible for monitorinq and controllinq landfill qas miqration.
However, amitiCJlltion measure of the project requires that durinq
qeotechnical testinq for building sites within 1,000 ~_t o~ the
landfill, shallow testinq will be conducted to detar:aine the
concentrations o~ methane qas and to verify the County'. compliance
with the monitorinq and control requi~ents.
0'rJDIR XSSUIlS
Plamdq "-~aaioD S~a~~ Jteport ~or Pebraary 16, 1993
The February 16, 1993 Planning commission Staf~ Report mis-stated
that the impacts to visual resources could not be fully aitiqated
(Attachlllent 3-A, Analysis - Visual Resources, It-. 1. and 2. on
paqes 8 and 9). The ErR stated that there were no aiqnificant
impacts to visual resources. The Addendum to the Final EIR
indicates that the project has the potential to result in adverse
impacts to views (from the Verdemont and Devore areas) and in
siqnificant impacts to the area's aesthetics as a result of
.-
o
o
Ca1Hat cajon Creek project
8peci~ic Plan No. 90-01 ,'(et a1)
Kayor and Common COUDcil Meeting o~
Kay 10, 1993
Page 8
::
landform alteration. However, these impacts are mitigated to below
a level of siqnificance as outlined in the Addendum.
Conditions o~ Approval (Revised March 9, 1993)
Since the February 16, 1993 Planning Commission meeting, staff has
reviewed the Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan No. 90-01,
Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31 and Tentative Parcel Map Nos.
14106, 14107 and 14108 and made some revisions and additions based
on public testimony, comments received and requests for
clarification of conditions from the applicant. The Conditions of
Approval contained in Attachment 9-A through 9-E represent the
third revision to that document. The purpose of these revisions
and additions are to clarify required actions and the
responsibility for such actions.
A new Condition of Approval has been added to SP No. 90-01 as a
result of staff's discussions with the county of San Bernardino
Regional Parks Department. Condition of Approval No. 23 requires
the submittal of truck routing plans for light and heavy industrial
uses if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning and Building
Services and the Director of Public Works. The Condition is
similar to Condition of Approval No. 34 for CUP No. 91-31 which
requires a rock truck routing plan for the proposed mining
operations. Both conditions require that affected agencies be
involved in the review process to preclude conflicts between large
vehicle traffic from the calMat cajon Creek Project and school bus,
Amphitheater event and residential traffic in the area.
Annexation and Project APprovals
If the Mayor and Common Council approve the calHat cajon Creek
Project, the Resolution certifying the ED and adopting Specific
Plan No. 90-01 and General Plan Amendment No. 91-18 will become
effective immediately. The Ordinance adoptinq Development Code
Amendment No. 92-06 will become effective 30 days after its second
reading. However, the approvals for Conditional Use Permit No. 91-
31/Reclamation Plan and Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108
would be contingent upon approval of Annexation No. 343 by the
Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) and the City.
o 0
Ca1Hat cajon Creek project
Speci:fic Plan No. 90-01 '(et all
Kayor and Common COUDci1 Meeting o:f
Kay 10, 1993
Page 9
MAYOR AIm COKMON CODClL OP'l'lONS
The Mayor and Common Council may:
1. Approve the applicant's proposal for Specific Plan No. 90-01,
General Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code Amendment
No. 92-01, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31jReclamation Plan,
Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108, certify the
Final Em, adopt the Statements of overridinq Consideration
and approve the Mitiqation Monitorinq Proqram.
2. Deny the applicant's proposal for Specific Plan No. 90-01 (and
the other project applications) and direct staff to prepare
findings-for that determination.
PPI.WNT1IfG COKKrSS:rON UC01lM1nm'a'I'TOIII
The Planning commission voted 7-2 to recommend to the Kayor and
Common Council the certification of the Em, preparation of
statements of overriding Considerations, approval of the Mitigation
Monitoring Proqram, approval o:f Specific Plan No. 90-01, General
Plan Amendment 1110. 91-18, Development COde Amendment No. 92-01,
Conditional Use Permit 1110. 91-31jReclamation Plan, Tentative Parcel
Hap Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108. The Planninq Commission included
in their recommendation a provision that the Mayor and Common
Council resolve the issues relatinq to traffic. These issues are
addressed in the Comments section of this Staff Report.
Please note that copies of the Planning Commission minutes for the
June 16, 1992, October 20, 1992 and February 16, 1993 meetings are
included in Attachments 4-A through 4-C, respectively.
~ 1I.,.,...-r6.p.......:l0.
sta:f:f recolllDlends that the Kayor and Common Council:
1. Adopt the Findings and statements of OVerridinq
Consideration based on the appropriate findinqs pursuant
to CEQA (Exhibit B to Attachment 1):
2. certify the Environmental Impact Report which includes
the OEm, FEm with Addendum and Technical Appendices
(Exhibits A-l through A-4 of Attachment 1):
o
o
Ca1Hat cajon creek project
8peci~ic Plan No. 90-01'(et al)
Hayor and co_on council Heetinq o~
Hay 10, 1993
Paqe 10
3. Approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(Exhibit A-5 of Attachment 1).
4. Approve General Plan Amendment No. 91-18 subject to the
Findings of Fact (Attachment 1 to Attachment 3-C).
5. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 92-06 subject to
the Findings of Fact (Attachment 2 to Attachment 3-C).
6. Adopt and approve Specific Plan No. 90-01 subject to the
Findings of Fact (Attachment 3 to Attachment A-3) and
Revised Conditions of Approval (Attachment 9-A) and
Standard Requirements (Attachment 3-C to Attachment 3-C).
7. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31 and Reclamation
Plan subject to the Findings of Fact (Attachment 4-A to
Attachment 3-C) , Revised Conditions of Approval
(Attachlllent 9-8) and.8tandard Requirements (Attachment 4-
C to Attachment 3-C).
8. Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 14106 subject to the
Findings of Fact (Attachment 5-A to Attachment 3-C) and
Revised Conditions of Approval (Attachment 9-C) and
Standard Requirements (Attachment 5-C to Attachment 3-C).
9. Approve Tentative Parcel Hap No. 141'07 subject to the
Findings of Fact (Attachment 6-A to Attachment 3-C) and
Revised Conditions of Approval (Attachment 9-D) and
Standard Requirements (Attachment 6-C to Attachll'ent 3-C) .
and,
10. Approve Tentative Parcel Hap No. 14108 subject to the
Findings o~ Fact (Atta("bJpent 7-A to Attachment 3-C) and
Revised Conditions of Approval (Attachment 9-') and
standard Requirements (Attachment 7-C to jAttachment 3-
C).
Prepared by:
Deborab Woldruff, Associate Planner
for Al Boughey, Director
Planning and Building Services
ATTACHMENTS:
1.
Resolution
Exhibits:
A-1 Draft Environmental "Impact 'Report*
o
o
Ca1Kat Cajon creek project
speciric Plan Bo. '0-01 (et a1)
Hayor and Common COUDci1 Heetinq or
Hay 10, 1"3
Paqe 11
A-2 Technical Appendices to the Draft
Environmental Impact Report*
A-3 Final Environmental Impact Report*
A-4 Addendum to the Final Environmental
Impact Report*
A-5 Mitiqation Monitorinq and Reportinq
Proqram*
B - Findinqs and statements of overridinq
consideration
C - Text Chanqes to the General Plan
D - site Location Map
E - Leqal Descriptions
F-1 calmat cajon Creek Specific Plan (Revised
May 14, 1993)*
F-2 Technical Appendices to the Specific Plan
(Revised May 14, 1993)*
2. Ordinance
3. Planninq commission Staff Reports*
A. February 16, 1993
B. october 20, 1992
C. June 2, 1992 (For June 16, 1992 Meetinq)
4. P1anninq commission Meetinq Minutes.
A. February 16, 1993 Meetinq
B. october 20, 1992 Meetinq (Draft)
C. June 16, 1992 Meetinq
5. Comments Received
A. COmments Received from May 1, 1992 to
February 3, 1993 (included in Attachment
3-A)
B. Comments Received (since February 3,
1993)
calmat C&j on Creek
Permit/Reclamation Plan
May 14, 1992)*
7. Responses to Traffic Concerns
A. April 5, 1993 Letter (C&lHat company)
B. March 29, 1993 Letter (New Horizons
Planninq Consultants, Inc.)
C. March 23, 1993 Letter (Charles P. Stronq
& Associates)
Conditional USe
Application (Revised
6.
o
o
CalXat cajon Creek Projet;:t
spacit!ic P1_ Bo. 90-01 "(et all
Kayor _4 Common COUDci1 .e.tinq ot!
Kay 10, 1993
Paqa 12
8. Responses to Air Quality Concerns
A. April 9, 1993 Letter (CalMat Company)
B. CalMat Cajon Creek Windbreak Schematic
C. April 9, 1993 Memo (Giroux & Associates)
9. Conditions of Approval (Revised March 9, 1993)
A. SP No. 90-01 Conditions of Approval
B. CUP No. 91-31 Conditions of Approval
C. TPK No. 14106 Conditions of Approval
D. TPK No. 14107 Conditions of Approval
E. TPK No. 14108 Conditions of Approval
* Distributed under separate cover dated April 22, 1993
o
o
1
2
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CERTIFYING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT: ADOPTING FINDINGS AND STATEMENTS OF
3 OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION: ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING
REPORTING PROGRAM: ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-18 TO
4 AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PLAN MAP AND TEXT: AND ADOPTING
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-01 (CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT) TO ESTABLISH
5 LAND USE DISTRICTS, PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND
DESIGN GUIDELINES.
6
7
8
9
10
11
SECTION I.
Recitals
(a)
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council adopted the General
Plan for the City of San Bernardino by Resolution No. 89-159 on
June 2, 1989: and
(b)
WHEREAS, on september 6, 1990, the Environmental Review
Committee determined that Specific Plan No. 90-01, a proposal to
12 establish land use districts, permitted uses, development standards
13 and design guidelines and to amend the General Plan Land Use Map
14 and text could have a significant effect on the environment and
15
thus warranted the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report
16 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): and
17
18 14, 1990 to solicit public comment on the preparation of the Draft
(c)
WHEREAS, the City held a public scoping meeting on August
19
EIR, and
20
21
(d)
WHEREAS, the intent of the City to prepare a Draft
made
the
public,
Environmental
known
to
Impact
Report
was
22 responsible
23
24
25
26
27
28
for
their
agencies
interested persons
and other
concerns and comments from September 12, 1990 to October 12, 1990,
as required by CEQA: and
(e)
WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared
to address Specific Plan No. 90-01 (to establish land use
IIII
1
o
o
1 districts, permitted uses, development standards and desiqn
2 guidelines), General Plan Amendment No. 91-18 (to change the land
3 use designation from IE, Industrial Extractive, IH, Industrial
4 Heavy and PFC, Public Flood Control to SP, Specific Plan and to
5 reference the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan in the Land Use
6 Element of the General Plan), Development Code Amendment No. 92-06
7 (to reference the CalMat Cajon Creek specific Plan in the
8 Development Code for purposes of implementation), Conditional Use
9 Permit No. 91-31/Reclamation Plan (to provide public review for the
10 proposed mining operations and to ensure compliance with the
11 Surface Mining And Reclamation Act of 1975 and the Development
12 Code) and Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108 (to subdivide
13 areas of the project site that are adjacent to cajon Boulevard and
14 Institution Road for future light and heavy industrial development)
15 in compliance with CEQA and local regulations1 and
16 (f) WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was made available to the public,
17 responsible agencies and other interested persons for their review
18 and comment from December 23, 1991 to February 7, 1992, as required
19 by CEQA; and
20 (g) WHEREAS, verbal and written comments were received on the
21 Draft EIR; and
22 (h) WHEREAS, these comments were responded to both orally and
23 in writing as required by CEQA; and
24 (i) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed
25 public hearing on June 16, 1992 in order to receive public
26 testimony and written and oral comments on Specific Plan No. 90-01,
27 General Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code Amendment No.
28 IIII
2
o
o
1 92-06, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31/Rec1amation Plan and Parc~l
2 Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108; and
3 (j) WHEREAS, the testimony given at the June 16, 1992
4 Planning Commission meeting indicated public concern regarding the
5 Environmental Impact Report, the Planning Commission determined
6 that an independent review of specified environmental topics was
7 needed to ensure compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 1642; and
8 (k) WHEREAS, an independent review was conducted on the air
9 quality, biology, surface hydrology and visual resources sections
10 of the Environmental Impact Report by a consultant team found to be
11 qualified in the environmental areas identified; and
12 (1) WHEREAS, the independent review resulted in an Addendum
13 to the Final Environmental Impact Report which substantiates the
14 conclusions of the Environmental Impact Report as they relate to
15 air quality, biOlogy, surface hydrology and visual resources; and
16 (m) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed
17 public hearing on February 16, 1993 in order to receive public
18 testimony and written and oral comments on the project (all
19 applications) and the independent review; and
20 (n) WHEREAS, the Planning and Building Services Department
21 Staff Reports dated June 16, 1992, October 20, 1992 and February
22 16, 1992, which summarize the potential effects of the Specific
23 Plan which proposes to establish land use districts, permitted
24 uses, development standards and design guidelines and all elements
25 of the General Plan Amendment, Development Code Amendment,
26 Conditional Use PermitlRec1amation Plan and subdivisions identified
27 in the Draft EIR and the FEIR were reviewed by the Planning
28 IIII
3
o
o
1 Commission; and
2 (0) WHEREAS, the proposed Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
3 Program was reviewed by the Planning Commission in compliance with
CEQA; and
4
5
6
7
8 consideration, adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program,
9 adoption of the Specific Plan, adoption of the General Plan
10 Amendment, adoption of the Development Code Amendment, approval of
11 the Conditional Use PermitlReclamation Plan and approval of the
12 Parcel Maps; and
13 (q) WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council conducted a noticed
14 public hearing on May 10, 1993 and fully reviewed and considered
15 the Draft EIR, Final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
16 Program, Findings and Statements of OVerriding Consideration, the
17 Planning Division staff reports and the recommendations of the
18 Planning Commission.
19 SECTION II. Environmental ImDact ReDort
20 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED THAT THE
21 MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL HEREBY CERTIFY:
22 A. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR), for Specific Plan No.
23 90-01, General Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code
24 Amendment No. 92-06, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-
25 31/Reclamation Plan and Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108
26 has been completed in compliance with the California
27 Environmental Quality Act. The EIR and all the evidence and
28 IIII .-
(p) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after receiving public
testimony, recommended certification of the Environmental Impact
Report, adoption of the Findings and Statements of OVerriding
4
IU',,'-"'-
1
2
3
4
5
6 B.
7
8
9
10
11
12 c.
13
14
15
16
17
18 D.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 IIII
o
o
information contained therein is attached hereto as Exhibit A-
1 (Draft EIR), Exhibit A-2 (Technical Appendices), Exhibit A-3
(Final EIR), Exhibit A-4 (Addendum to the Final EIR) and
Exhibit A-5 (Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) and
incorporated herein by reference;
The EIR was presented to the Mayor and Common Council who have
reviewed and considered the information in the EIR prior to
adopting Specific Plan No. 90-01, General Plan Amendment No.
91-18, Development Code Amendment No. 92-06, Conditional Use
Permit No. 91-31/Reclamation Plan and Parcel Map Nos. 14106,
14107 and 14108.
The Final EIR has identified all significant environmental
effects of Specific Plan No. 90-01, General Plan Amendment No.
91-18, Development Code Amendment No. 92-06, Conditional Use
Permit No. 91-31/Reclamation Plan and Parcel Map Nos. 14106,
14107 and 14108 and there are no known potentially significant
environmental effects not addressed in the Final EIR.
Although the Final EIR identifies certain significant
environmental effects that would result if Specific Plan No.
90-01, General Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code
Amendment No. 92-06, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-
31/Reclamation Plan and Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108
are adopted, all significant effects that can feasibly be
avoided or mitigated will be avoided or mitigated by the
implementation of the mitigation measures as set forth in the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Final EIR.
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and all
.-
5
-,..
1
2
3 E.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 F.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 G.
24
25
26
27
28 IIII
o
o
information contained therein is attached hereto as Exhibit A-
S and incorporated herein by reference;
Potential mitigation measures and other project alternatives
not incorporated into or adopted as part of Specific Plan No.
90-01, General Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code
Amendment No. 92-06, Conditional. Use Permit No. 91-
31/Reclamation Plan and Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108
were rejected as infeasible, based on specific economic,
social or other considerations as set forth in the Findings
and Statements of OVerriding Consideration. The Findings and
Statements of OVerriding Consideration and all the evidence
and information contained therein are attached hereto as
Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference;
The Mayor and Common Council have given great weight to the
significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. The
Mayor and Common Council. find that the significant unavoidable
adverse impacts are clearly outweighed by the economic, social
and other benefits of Specific Plan No. 90-01, General Plan
Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code Amendment No. 92-06,
Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31/Rec1amation Plan and Parcel
Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108, as set forth in the Findings
and Statements of OVerriding Consideration.
The findings contained in the Findings and Statements of
overriding Consideration with respect to the significant
impacts identified in the Final EIR are true and correct, and
are based upon substantial evidence in the record, including
documents comprisinq the Final EIR.
,
-~"
o
o
The Final Envi~onmental Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program and the Findings and statements of
OVerriding Consideration reflect the independent review and
analysis and the independent judgement of the City of San
Bernardino.
1 H.
2
3
4
5
6
7 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
8 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO THAT:
9 A. The CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan is internally
10 consistent with the General Plan, in that it strives for
the obtainment of all applicable General Plan Goals
regarding employment opportunities, capitalization on and
respect for the City's natural resources, the
establishment of an industrial corridor, the management
of designated areas for mineral extraction to meet the
needs of the area, the reduction of incompatibilities
between mineral extraction areas and other land uses, and
the assurance for adequate reclamation of mineral
extraction areas.
The CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan will not be
detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City, in that
implementation of the Specific Plan will be in accordance
with all mitigation measures contained within the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, all
Conditions of Approval, all Standard Requirements and any
subsequent approvalslpermits required to implement the
SECTION III.
Findinas
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 B.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 IIII
.-
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
C.
D.
21
22
23 E.
24
25
26
27
28 IIII
o
o
project.
The change of designation from IH, Industrial Heavy on
approximately 26 acres, IE, Industrial Extractive on
approximately 1,186 acres and PFC, Public Flood Control
on approximately 180 acres to SP, Specific Plan - CalMat
Cajon Creek Project for the project site located on the
west side of Cajon Boulevard generally located between
Devore Road and the unincorporated County of San
Bernardino community of Muscoy for the proposed general
plan amendment will change the Land Use Map and add text
to the Land Use Element and is not in conflict with the
goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan.
The subject property is physically suitable for the
requested Specific Plan (SP) land use designation and the
anticipated land use developments in that the areas
proposed for mineral resource extraction have been
formally designated by the State as being regionally
significant and of prime importance in meeting the future
needs of the San Bernardino region and future land uses
proposed will serve as a physical and visual buffer of
the mining operations while increasing the City's
available land for industrial development.
The subject parcels are physically suitable for the
industrial light and heavy designations and anticipated
land use development(s) in that the provision of access,
utilities and services, compatibility with adjacent land
uses and the physical constraints are addressed in the
8
""T"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
F.
19
20
21
22
23
24 H.
25
26
27
28 IIII
o
o
G.
Calmat ca~on Creek Specific Plan which is part of this
proposal. The proposed designations also permit uses
that are compatible with the remaining extractive
designations and would not preclude mining and mining
related activities.
The CalMat cajon Creek Specific Plan will ensure
development of desirable character which will be
compatible with existing and proposed development in the
surrounding neighborhood in that the nature of the
industrial development which will occur within the
Specific Plan areas will be governed by comprehensive
Planning Area Regulations which provide more specificity
as to the types of uses which will be permitted, as well
as by development standards regarding setbacks, heights,
lot coverage, etc., all of which shall serve to reduce
any incompatibilities with adjacent land uses.
The proposed specific plan will contribute to a balance
"of land uses so that local residents may work and shop in
the community in which they live in that the CalMat Cajon
Creek specific Plan includes a total of 298 acres which
will ultimately be developed with industrial uses and
additional employment opportunities will also be provided
by 606 acres of mining-related activities.
The proposed map amendment will not affect the balance of
land uses within the City in that the change in
designation is from one type of industrial use to
another. However, it will remove areas containing State
,
o
o
::
1 designate~ regionally significant mineral resources from
2 that designation. These areas are relatively small in
3 size and the amount of land necessary to provide a buffer
4 from existing, incompatible uses will make it infeasible
5 to mine.
6 I. The CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan and attendant
7 general plan map and text amendments will not be
8 detrimental to the public interest, health, safety and
9 welfare of the City in that it removes certain areas from
10 the IE, Industrial Extractive designation that have
11 certain constraints such as inadequate size or proximity
12 to other types of land uses that would preclude
13 compatibility.
14 SECTION IV. Certification of the Environmental ImDact ReDort
15 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the
16 Mayor and Common Council that the Environmental Impact Report is
17 certified, the Statements of OVerriding Consideration are adopted
18 and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is adopted.
19 SECTION v. Amendments
20 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
21 OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO THAT:
22 A. The Land Use Element of the General Plan of the City of San
23 Bernardino is amended by adding text which consists of a goal,
24 objective and policies for the SP, Specific Plan - CalMat
25 Cajon Creek Project land use designation. A copy of the text
26 for the SP, Specific Plan - CalMat Cajon Creek Project land
27 use designation is attached hereto as Exhibit C and
28 IIII
10
o
o
incorporated herein by reference.
The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the city of San
Bernardino is amended by changing approximately 26 acres from
IH, Industrial Heavy, approximately 1,186 acres from IE,
Industrial Extractive and approximately 180 acres from PFC,
Public Flood Control to SP, Specific Plan - CalMat Cajon Creek
Project for a total of 1,392 acres. The location of this
amendment is outlined on the map entitled Exhibit D and is
more specifically described in the legal descriptions entitled
Exhibits E-1 through E-13, copies of which are attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference.
The text and map amendments described in Section V.,
Subsections A. and B. are designated as General Plan Amendment
14 No. 91-18.
15 SECTION VI. Text Chanae And Man Notations
16 This resolution and the amendments affected by it shall be
17 inserted in an appropriate location in the Land Use Element of the
18 General Plan and noted on such appropriate General Plan maps which
19 have been previously adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common
20 Council and which are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
21 SECTION VII. snecific Plan
22 The CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan No. 90-01 for the
23 development 1,392 acres west of Cajon Boulevard and generally
24 located between Devore Road and the unincorporated community of
25 Muscoy is hereby adopted. The Specific Plan includes General Plan
26 Amendment No. 91-18 (SP, Specific Plan -CalMat Cajon Creek
27 Project), which will change the General Plan Land Use designation
28 IIII
1
2 B.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 c.
13
11
o
o
1 from IH, Industrial Heavy, IE, Industrial Extractive and PFt,
2 Public Flood Control to SPIL (Specific Plan - Industrial Light),
3 SPIH (Specific Plan - Industrial Heavy), SPIE (Specific Plan -
4 Industrial Extractive) and SPOS (Specific Plan - Open Space) and
5 outline the boundary of the Specific Plan Area. The Specific Plan
6 will be referenced in the Land Use Element of the General Plan as
7 shown in Exhibit C. A copy of the Specific Plan is attached hereto
8 as Exhibit F-l (CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan) and Exhibit F-2
9 (Technical Appendices) and incorporated herein by reference.
10 Development Code Amendment No. 92-06 will implement the Specific
Plan through the accompanying ordinance.
SECTION VIII. Notice Of Determination
11
12
13 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of
14 Determination with the county Clerk of the County of San Bernardino
15 certifying the city's compliance with the California Environmental
16 Act in preparing and adopting the Environmental Impact Report and
17 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. A copy of the Notice
18 of Determination will be forwarded to the State Clearing House.
SECTION IX. Effective Date
19
20
21 adoption by the Mayor and Common Council.
22 IIII
23 IIII
24 IIII
25 IIII
26
27
28
This
resolution
shall become
effective
immediately upon
12
o
o
1 RESOLUTION... CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT: ADOPTING
FINDINGS AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION: ADOPTING THE
2 MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM: ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 91-18 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PLAN MAP AND
3 TEXT: AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-01 (CAIMAT CAJON CREEK
PROJECT) TO ESTABLISH LAND USE DISTRICTS, PERMITTED USES,
4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES.
5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
6 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
7 Bernardino at a meeting therefore held on the
8
day of
, 1993, by the following vote to
9 wit:
10 Council Members
11 ESTRADA
12 REILLY
~
~
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
13 HERNANDEZ
14 MAUDSLEY
15 MINOR
16 POPE-LUDLAM
17 MILLER
18
19
20 day of
21
22
23
24
25
26
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
, 1993.
W.R. Holcomb, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to
form and legal content:
JAMES F. PENMAN
City ~t_o_~ev h/_
27 BYy'~'V'~
28
13
1
2
o
o
ORDINANCE NO.
::
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING CHAPTER
19.10 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (TITLE 19 - THE
3 DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO ADD SECTION 19.10.030(5) TO ESTABLISH THE
CALMAT CAJON CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (SP, SPECIFIC PLAN - CALMAT CAJON
4 CREEK PROJECT) LAND USE DESIGNATIONIZONE, PERMITTED USES,
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES.
5
THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO
6 ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
7
8 as follows:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 IIII
24 IIII
25 IIII
26 IIII
27
28
Page 1I-155 BB, Section 19.06.030(5), is amended
SECTION 1.
a) Add new Item 5.
liS. SDeClifia Plan No. 90-01. Ca1mat Ca10n Creek
This Specific Plan district is intended to provide for
the development of industrial light, industrial heavy,
industrial extractive and open space uses with mining-
related interim uses within the CalMat Cajon Creek
Specific Plan Area and to provide employment
opportunities within the CalMat cajon Creek Specific Plan
area for existing and future residents of the City and
those of adjacent communities. The CalMat Cajon Creek
Specific Plan establishes land use districts, permitted
uses, development standards and design guidelines for the
Specific Plan area and is incorporated herein by
reference."
1
o
o
1 ORDINANCE.. . AMENDING CHAPTER 19.10 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL
CODE (TITLE 19 - THE DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO ADD SECTION 19.10.030(5)
2 TO ESTABLISH THE CALMAT CAJON CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (SP, SPECIFIC
PLAN - CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT) LAND USE DESIGNATION/ZONE,
3 PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES.
4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted
5 by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
6
7
8 council Members:
9 ESTRADA
10 REILLY
11 HERNANDEZ
12 MAUDSLEY
13 MINOR
14 POPE-LUDLAM
15 MILLER
meeting, therefore, held on the
, 1993, by the following vote to wit:
day of
~
~
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
16
17
City Clerk
18 of
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this
, 1993.
day
w. R. Holcomb, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to
form and legal content:
JAMES F. PENMAN,
Cit~
By: )
" -
.-
2
--
o
o
SPBCXAL PURPOSBS DXSTRXCTS-19.10
5. SDecific Plan No. 90-01. Calmat Ca10n Creek
This Specific Plan district is intended to provide for the
development of industrial light, industrial heavy, industrial
extractive and open space uses with mining-related interim
uses within the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan Area and to
provide employment opportunities within the CalMat Cajon Creek
Specific Plan area for existing and future residents of the
city and those of adjacent communities. The CalMat Cajon
Creek Specific Plan establishes land use districts, permitted
uses, development standards and design guidelines for the
Specific Plan area and is incorporated herein by reference.
II-155BB
o ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT "0
CANDIDATE FINDINGS AND
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING COl\"SIDERATIONS
REGARDL'\'G ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF APPROVAL OF
THE CALMAT CAJON CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/RECLAMA TION PLAN
General Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Specific Plan No. 90-01,
Development Code Amendment No. 9206,
Conditional Use Permit and Reclamation Plan No. 9131, and
Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107, 14108
The Common Council of the City of San Bernardino (the "Council"), in approving the
General Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Specitic Plan No. 90-01, Development Code
Amendment No. - 9206, Conditional Use Permit and Reclamation Plan No. 9131, and
Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108 (hereinafter, the "project"), makes the
following findings which are supported by the corresponding facts pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and
Section 15041 of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code of Regulations Section 1 000 ~
~.
CEQA Guidelines (Guidelines) Section 15091 provides: provide:
"(a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an ElR has
been completed which identifies one or more significant environmental effects
of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for
each of those significant effects accompanied by a brief explanation of the
rationale for each finding. The possible findings are:
(1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as
identified in the Final EIR.
(2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of
another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes
BI90S3139N1PJ.RPT jcd April I. 1993
I
o
o
::
have been adopted by such other agency, or can and should be adopted by
such other agency.
(3) Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR."
The Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which includes the Draft EIR, the Final EIR and
the Addendum, for the proposed project identifies eleven basic groups of adverse impacts,
some of which are non-significant and some of which are significant. All of the impacts
identified are mitigable to some extent, most are mitigable to a level of non-significance.
The City hereby finds that the project will have the potential significant impacts set forth in
the EIR and adopts the findings set forth in the EIR as findings of the City.
These Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations consist of Sections 1.0 through
6.0. Section 1.0 provides an overview of the project. Section 2.0 contains a summary of
project impacts that are significant but will be reduced to a level of non-significance through
implementation of mitigation measures. Section 3.0 addresses impacts that are mitigated to
some extent after the imposition of mitigation measures, but not to a level of non-
significance. These unmitigable impacts and mitigation measures, the rationale for their
effectiveness, and the reasons why other mitigation is infeasible, are described in Section
3.0. The project offers benefits which have been balanced against its unmitigable
environmental effects. These are described in Section 4.0. The EIR analyzes a range of
alternatives to the project which are discussed in Section 5.0. Conclusions are given in
Section 6.0.
.-
B\90S3139N1PI-RPT jcd April I. 1993
2
o
o
1.0
BACKGROUND
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED APPROVALS
The applicant, CalMat Co., in requesting approval of General Plan Amendment No. 91-18,
Specific Plan No. 90-01, Development Code Amendment No. 9206, Conditional Use Permit
and Reclamation Plan No. 9131, and Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107, and 14108
(hereinafter referred to as the "Cajon Creek Project"), proposes to establish plans for land
use, permitted uses, development standards and design guidelines within the Cajon Creek
Project site. The proposed site consists of 1,392 acres of land located on the west side of
Cajon Boulevard, generally between Devore Road and the unincorporated community of
Muscoy.
The Cajon Creek Project would provide for the establishment of mineral extractive, heavy
industrial, light industrial and open space uses with mining-related interim uses on the site.
The project is phased with ultimate build-out anticipated at 25 years for the light and heavy
industrial uses. Also involved in the project is the annexation to the City of portions of the
project site.
The specific objectives of the Cajon Creek Project have been defined as follows (page 2-3
of the Draft EIR):
. Utilize those portions of the project site for industrial uses which take
advantage of the unique setting of the project area in relation to the Inland
Empire, Victor Valley and Ontario airport, and in terms of transportation
resources; i&., the proximity of the intersection of two Interstate Highways
and three railroad systems (Atcheson, Topeka, and Santa Fe (AT &SF); Union
Pacific; and Southern Pacific).
. Extract and process sand, gravel and rock from the floodplain and alluvial
terrace of Cajon Creek Wash, in accordance with the Regionally Significant
Mineral Resource designation by the State Mining and Geology Board and
B\9053139N11'1-RI'I" jcd April I. 1993
3
. ..
- .
o
o
with the City of San Bernardino's General Plan, for distribution within the
San Bernardino regional market.
. Provide for the conservation and protection of sensitive biological habitats by
conserving open space, which would create a corridor connecting open space
area in the Cajon Creek floodplain with a conservation areas further to the
west.
The Cajon Creek Project consists of sixteen "Planning Areas" which make-up the 1,392 acre
project site. (Attachment A identifies the location of the Planning Areas on the project site).
Phasing, or development timing, has been placed into three categories: "Near Term",
"Intermediate Term" and "Long Term". A summary of the Specific Plan Development
Phases is provided in Attachment B. (It is understood that the phases, as defined, are for
planning purposes and do not restrict development to these phases, or require completion of
one phase prior to commencement of the next). Actual development of land covered by the
Specific Plan will be predicated upon the market for aggregate, as well as for the industrial
property, in addition to the development of necessary supportive infrastructure.
Within the phasing categories are "Development Clusters", which indicate related
development activity. Near Term refers to foreseeable development or mineral resource-
related activity which may occur during the early years of Specific Plan implementation. As
the market for industrial land within the Specific Plan area continues to evolve, Intermediate
Term development would be expected to occur. Long Term development within the Specific
Plan area would occur as the market for industrial land matures, Near Term extractive and
processing operations are completed, and interim uses are replaced with ultimate land uses.
This would be expected to include Light and Heavy Industrial development or
redevelopment.
1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
The environmental review process for the Cajon Creek Project began on September 6, 1990.
Based on the findings in the Initial Study, the City made a determination to prepare an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that addresses all of the potentially significant
environmental issues outlined in the Initial Study checklist. The City released the Initial
B\90S3139N\PJ-\lPI' jcd April 1. 1993
4
o
o
.
Study and Notice of Preparation to the public on September 12, 1990. These two documents
and responses to the Notice of Preparation are included in the E1R as Appendix A.
The Draft EIR for the Cajon Creek Project (SCH#90020908) was prepared by Woodward-
Clyde Consultants and released to the public on December 20, 1991. Comment letters were
received and responses to comments are included in the Final EIR. The Final EIR for the
Cajon Creek Project consists of the following components:
. The Initial Study, September 6, 1990
. The Notice of Preparation, September 12, 1990
. Responses to Notice of Preparation (through October 12, 1990)
. The Draft EIR, released December 20, 1991
. The comments received on the Draft EIR during the public review process
and the responses to those comments
. The Addendum to the EIR, February 1993
. The Staff Reports and attachments containing these Findings of Facts and
Statement of Overriding Considerations; and, the Mitigation Monitoring!
Reporting Program.
At the Planning Commission hearing on June 16, 1992, the City decided to retain outside
consultants to independently review the EIR's discussion of four categories of impacts (Air
Quality, Biology, Hydrology and Visual Resources). The major conclusions which
emerged from the review are as follows:
1. The project will not create any new significant effects which were not
previously evaluated in the EIR;
.-
B\90S3139N1PJ-RPT jcd April I. 1m
5
o
o
2. The significant effects discussed in the ErR will not be substantially more
severe than anticipated; and,
3. No mitigation measures or alternatives which were previously thought to be
infeasible or were not previously considered are now considered feasible or
found to substantially reduce one or more significant effects.
The review resulted in analyses from the peer review consulting team and responses from
the City's original EIR consultant which was compiled in an Addendum to the EIR.
Essentially, the conclusions of the ErR are not changed as a result of the information
contained in the Addendum. The information in the Addendum clarifies discussions
contained in the EIR and makes minor technical changes, only. Therefore, under the
provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15 164(a)(b)(c) , the review document qualifies as an
Addendum to the Final EIR and constitutes part of the EIR.
1.3 HEARINGS FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROJECT AND EIR
The following hearings were held at which comments were accepted on the ErR and
proposed project:
~ Reviewin~ Body
January 30, 1992
May 14, 1992
June 16, 1992
February 16, 1993
April 5, 1993
City DRC/ERC
City DRC/ERC
City Planning Commission
City Planning Commission
Mayor and Common Council
.-
8I9m3139N\PI-RPT jod April I. 1993
6
"
o
o
2.0
IMPACTS MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
The Common' Council finds that in the following areas, the project's environmental impacts
are potentially significant, but are mitigated to a level of insignificance by changes which
have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the
significant environmental effects.
2.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
2.1.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The project site contains habitat and associated wildlife. The loss of habitat as a result of
aggregate mining and related activities includes: 640 acres outside of the flood plain (which
is currently either degraded or disturbed); and 240 acres of Riversidian alluvial fan sage
scrub habitat within the floodplain (which is in its natural state). The Project may also create
the potential for long-term, cumulative regional impacts on biological resources.
Findings from field surveys did not find that the project site contains the slender-horned
spineflower (a State and Federally listed endangered species), or the California gnatcatcher
and the Los Angeles pocket mouse (both Federal Candidates for listing and California
Species of Special Concern). Surveys and analyses of the site indicate a low potential for
the California gnatcatcher or the Los Angeles pocket mouse to inhabit the site.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, even though studies to date have found no slender-horned
spineflower species on-site, Section 3.0 assumes that there is a potential that this species may
be present on-site and assumes that impacts on those species are unmitigable but outweighed
by project benefits.
B\90S3139N\P1-1lPT jcd Aprill. 1993
7
o
o
2.1.2 Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the potential signiticant biological impacts identitied in the EIR.
Furthermore, the EIR identities impacts that are not signiticant and without the need for
mitigation, but mitigation measures have been identified in the Mitigation Monitoringl
Reporting Program (MM/RP) in order to further minimize these non-significant impacts.
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans (i.e. the MM/RP), the
Specific Plan, Reclamation Plan and Revegetation Plan), there will be no significant
unavoidable adverse impacts on biological resources. The specific mitigation measures from
the EIR and the MM/RP that mitigate biological impacts to a level of non-significance are
described below.
While some sensitive habitat will be impacted by aggregate mining and related activities in
Planning Area P, about 488 acres will be conserved as open space in Planning Area 0; and
approximately 257 acres will be added to the open space within the active floodplain (the
western portion of the site) following mining in Planning Area P. The result is the
conservation of approximately 745 acres of habitat (over 96 percent of the Riversidian
alluvial fan sage scrub on the site). As the vegetation is removed, the associated wildlife
will either be impacted or displaced to adjacent habitat areas. Nevertheless, while the EIR
finds that the project ultimately affects over half of the site's undisturbed natural acreage,
there are mitigations as well as project conditions that will reduce this impact to a level of
non-significance, i.e.. the provision of an extensive revegetation plan that will be phased
concurrently with mining; and, conservation of open space and the reclamation of Planning
Area P.
Even though based on the studies conducted to date no mitigation is required relative to
impacts to slender-homed spineflower, the California gnatcatcher and the Los Angeles pocket
mouse, the following have been imposed as conditions on the project and, at the appropriate
development phase, shall be required in order to further minimize these non-significant
impacts:
Bl9(lS3139N\PJ.RPT jcd April I. 1993
8
o
o
. Three slender-homed spineflower surveys will be conducted in accordance
with recommendations by Tierra Madre Consultants in Technical Appendix
B of the EIR
. A Los Angeles County Pocket Mouse survey will be conducted prior to
mining in Planning Area P
. Two California Gnatcatcher surveys will be conducted in accordance with the
California Gnatcatcher Survey Guidelines.
The mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary ("ES"), pages ES-6
through ES- II (Attachment C) and Section 4.1 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) also serve to
mitigate biological impacts to a level of non-significance.
2.1.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The project's potential biological impacts have been eliminated or substantially lessened to
a level of non-significance by virtue of the mitigation measures identitied in the ErR and its
components, and restated in the MM/RP. Such measures are within the responsibility of the
City. They have been adopted by the City in the MM/RP and will be imposed as Conditions
of Approval in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.10.
The most substantial mitigation measure is the conservation and reclamation of sensitive
habitat. 488 acres will be placed in permanent open space immediately upon project
approval. The project's conservation and management of these resources is identified in the
Conditional Use Permit and Reclamation Plan to assure that the mitigation measures are
implemented. Other mitigation measures will assure that disturbances which do occur will
be minimal. Follow-up surveys on sensitive species will give the City the opportunity to
monitor and confirm the results of studies contained in the EIR. Therefore, the Council
finds that these impacts will be mitigated to a level of non-significance.
B\90S3139N1PI-RPT jcd April I. 1993
9
o
o
2.2 AIR QUALITY
2.2.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The Cajon Creek Project may potentially result in the following significant impacts to air
quality: fugitive dust derived from scattered sources in addition to processing equipment,
increased dust emissions from all rock production and distribution, local air quality impacts
from creation of dust emissions during Santa Ana wind conditions, aggregate product hauling
emissions and industrial park vehicular emissions of ROG, CO2 and NO.. increased
stationary source emissions (including NOJ from light and heavy industrial uses and
asphaltic concrete plant and cumulative air quality impacts from combustion impacts and dust
(PM-IO).
Cumulative air quality impacts from combustion emissions and dust from Santa Ana wind
conditions will result in unavoidable adverse impacts. These impacts are discussed in
Section 3.0.
2.2.2 Findings
With the exception of project impacts from combustion emission sources (both aggregate
product hauling and industrial park vehicles) and cumulative air quality impacts from
combustion emissions and dust; changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated
into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant air quality
impacts identified in the EIR. Furthermore, the EIR identifies impacts that are not
significant and without the need for mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted
in the MM1RP in order to further minimize non-signiticant impacts. Therefore, with
implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans <i&., the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan and Revegetation Plan), there will
be no significant unavoidable adverse impacts on air quality (except as stated in Section 3.0).
The mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages ES-12
through ES-16 (Attachment C) and Section 4.2 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve to
mitigate these impacts, with the exception of project related impacts from combustion
B\90S3139N\PJ-RYT jcd April.. 1m
10
. .
o
o
::
emissions; and cumulative air quality impacts from combustion emissions and dust, to a level
of non-significance.
2.2.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The above identified potentially signiticant air quality impacts have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of non-significance by virtue of the mitigation measures
identified in the EIR and its components, and restated in the MM/RP. Ultimate enforcement
of the mitigation measures calling for compliance with SCAQMD Rules 403 and 401 and
Regulation XIII, and for the issuance of SCAQMD permits is within the responsibility of the
SCAQMD and not the City; however, it is anticipated that the mitigation measures will be
adopted by such agency. The mitigation measures have been adopted by the City in the
MM/RP and will be imposed as Conditions of Approval in accordance with Public Resources
Code Section 21081.10.
The AQMD rules, permits, and regulations, together with implementation of the high wind
response plan, are mitigation measures that will be imposed to reduced impacts associated
with aggregate and industrial sources. Air quality regulations for these sources are well-
established and have proven effective in other similar contexts. Vehicular emissions from
site tenants will be reduced with the implementation of a transportation demand management
program designed specifically for this project. Therefore, the Council finds that these
impacts will be mitigated to a level of non-significance.
2.3 GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL
2.3.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The Cajon Creek Project may potentially result in the following significant impacts to
geologic and geotechnical resources: ground rupture along potentially active fault traces, as
delineated by the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone (APSSZ); ground motions at the
subject site and the surrounding area in the event of a moderate to large earthquake on a
nearby fault; groundwater impacts resulting from mining in Planning Areas F, L, M and P;
and potential slope instability in mining areas.
B\9053139N1PJ-RPT jcd April I. 1993
11
o
o
::
The project site is adjacent to the Cajon Boulevard Landfill under the ownership of San
Bernardino County. Migration of methane gas from the landfill represents a potential
significant impact.
2.3.2 Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the potential significant geologic and geotechnical impacts identified
in the EIR. Furthermore, the EIR identifies impacts that are not significant and without the
need for mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted in the MM/RP in order to
further minimize these non-significant impacts.
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans (i&., the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan and Revegetation Plan), there will
be no significant unavoidable adverse impacts relating to geologic and geotechnical
resources.
The mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages ES-17
through ES-20 (Attachment C) and Section 4.3 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve to
mitigate these impacts to a level of non-signiticance.
2.3.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The project's potential significant geologic and geotechnical impacts have been eliminated
or substantially lessened to a level of non-signiticance by virtue of the mitigation measures
identified in the EIR and its components, and restated in the MM/RP. Such measures are
within the responsibility of the City and have been adopted by the City in the MM/RP. The
mitigation measures will also be imposed as Conditions of Approval in accordance with
Public Resources Code Section 21081.10. The Council adopts the EIR's conclusion that
potentially significant impacts relating to ground rupture, ground shaking, groundwater
quantity and quality, and slope stability will be mitigated. Furthermore, although testing will
be conducted to determine if there is landfill gas migration onto the site, the County is
responsible for mitigation relative to such migration. Groundwater monitoring, which is a
Condition of Approval, will provide for observation of potential groundwater impacts. The
B\90S3139N\PJ-RPT jod April I. 1993
12
o
o
focus of the mitigation measures and project conditions is to protect humans from seismic
dangers and to avoid or minimize contact with groundwater basins. Therefore, the Council
finds that these impacts will be mitigated to a level of non-significance.
2.4 SURFACE HYDROLOGY
2.4.1 Potential Significant hnpacts
The Cajon Creek Project may potentially result in the following significant impacts to surface
hydrology: flood flow hazards within the FEMA-mapped Cajon Creek IOO-year floodplain
(primarily to Institution Road, MWD/SGYMWD Aqueducts and the CalNev 8" pipeline) due
to in-stream mining, drainage of surface run-oft. from mining areas, aggregate processing
plant sites and industrial development areas, construction related water quality impacts due
to sediment movement, and degradation of surface water quality within and downstream from
the site due to processing operations at the portable plants in Planning Areas D and I, and
the permanent plant in Planning Area N.
2.4.2 Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts related to surface hydrology that are
identified in the Final EIR. Furthermore, the EIR identifies impacts that are not significant
and without the need for mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted in the
MM/RP in order to further minimize these non-significant impacts.
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans (~, the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan and Revegetation Plan), there will
be no significant unavoidable adverse impacts relating to surface hydrology.
The specific mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages
ES-21 through ES-24 (Attachment C) and Section 4.4 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve
to mitigate these impacts to a level of non-significance.
.-
B\9053139N\PJ-RPT jcd April I. 1993
13
0-
o
o
'.
2.4.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The project's potential significant surface hydrological impacts have been eliminated or
substantially lessened to a level of non-signiticance by virtue of the mitigation measures
identified in the EIR and its components, and restated in the MM/RP. The mitigation
measures relating to surface runoff and plant process water are within the responsibility of
the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and it is anticipated that such
measures will be adopted by such agency. The mitigation measures have been adopted by
the City in the MM/RP and as Conditions of Approval in accordance with Public Resources
Code Section 21081.10. Additionally, a Condition of Approval requires that appropriate
hydrology/engineering studies will be conducted to monitor the need for streambed
stabilization and to provide such stabilization if required. The project conditions together
with the mitigation measures will ensure that Cajon Creek will retain as normal a course and
velocity as possible and will ensure that no habitable structures will be built within its
floodplain. Therefore, the Council finds that these impacts will be mitigated to a level of
non-significance.
2.5 NOISE
2.5.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The Cajon Creek Project may potentially result in the following significant noise impacts:
increased project noise levels on surrounding sensitive land uses from mineral resources
processing in Planning Areas D, I, and N.
2.5.2 Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the potential signiticant impacts related to noise that are identified in
the EIR. Furthermore, the EIR identifies impacts that are not significant and without the
need for mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted in the MM/RP in order to
further minimize these non-significant impacts.
B\90S3139N\PJ.RPT jcd April I. 1993
14
o
o
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans (i.e., the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan and Revegetation Plan), there will
be no significant unavoidable adverse noise impacts.
The specific mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages
ES-25 through ES-26 (Attachment C) and Section 4.5 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve
to mitigate noise impacts to a level of non-significance.
2.5.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The project's potential significant noise impacts have been eliminated or substantially
lessened to a level of non-significance by virtue of the mitigation measures identified in the
EIR and its components, and restated in the MM/RP. Such measures are within the
responsibility of the City and have been adopted by the City in the MM/RP. The mitigation
measures will also be imposed as Conditions of Approval in accordance with Public
Resources Code Section 21081.10.
The mitigation measure prohibiting hourly noise levels to exceed specified levels at the
nearest sensitive residential land uses to Planning Areas D, I and N caused by plant
operations, including aggregate extraction, processing, handling and formulation of any
construction materials have been developed pursuant to an acoustical analysis, and will assure
that increased project noise levels on surrounding sensitive land uses are reduced to a level
of non-significance. In addition, by designing the plant site layout so as to minimize the
impacts to residents to the southeast of Planning Area N it will help reduce project noise
levels to a level of non-significance. The project's compliance with Noise Review Policy
14.1.1 specified in the San Bernardino General Plan noise element will assure that the
cumulative impacts from all noise sources do not reach noise levels above 65 db(A) CNEL.
The mitigation measures will reduce the cumulative impacts from all noise sources to a level
of non-significance. Therefore, the Council tinds that these noise impacts will be mitigated
to a level of non-significance.
B\9053i39N\PJ.RPT jcd April I. 1993
15
o
o
2.6 LAND USE
2.6.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The Cajon Creek Project may potentially result in the following significant land use impact:
inconsistencies with City of San Bernardino General Plan in Planning Areas A, B, C, G, H,
I, J, and 0 due to the change in use of land zoned industrial extractive (IE), to open space
and industrial light (IL) and industrial heavy (IH) uses.
The project will also convert 124 acres of State-designated regionally significant mineraI
resource land to other uses. This impact is considered a significant unavoidable impact and
is discussed in Section 3.0.
2.6.2 Findings
With the exception of conversion of State-designated regionally significant mineraI resource
land to other uses, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the
project which avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant land use impacts identified
in the EIR. Furthermore, the EIR identifies impacts that are not significant and without the
need for mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted in the MM/RP in order to
further minimize these non-significant impacts.
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans ~, the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan and Revegetation Plan), there will
be no significant unavoidable adverse impacts on land use.
The mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages ES-27
through ES-28 (Attachment C) and Section 4.6 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve to
mitigate these impacts to a level of non-signiticance.
2.6.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The above identified potential significant land use impacts, with the exception of conversion
of mineraI resource land to other uses, have been eliminated or-substantially lessened to a
B\9Q53139N1PJ.RPT jcd April I. 1993
16
o
o
level of non-significance by virtue of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR and its
components, and restated in the MM1RP. Such measures are within the responsibility of the
City and have been adopted by the City in the MM1RP. The mitigation measures will also
be imposed as Conditions of Approval in accordance with Public Resources Code Section
21081.10.
As mitigation, the proposed Specific Plan would amend the land use element of the San
Bernardino General Plan and re-zone portions of the site presently zoned for mineral
extraction to allow for a mix of heavy and light industrial development and open space uses
in appropriate areas of the site. The mitigation measures require a General Plan amendment,
Specific Plan Planning Area Regulations, and Design Guidelines. Although the project
requires an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map, it is consistent with the
unaffected portions of the General Plan for the reasons set forth in the Resolution adopting
the General Plan Amendment. Such an amendment would be fully consistent with the City's
stated goals and policies on mineral resources and conservation and enhancement of
biological resources and would reduce the impacts associated with the zoning changes within
Planning Areas A, B, C, G, H, I, J and 0 to a level of non-significance. Therefore, the
Council finds that these land use impacts, with the exception of mineral resource conversion
impacts, will be mitigated to a level of non-significance.
2.7 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
2.7.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The project may potentially result in the following significant traffic and circulation impacts:
an increase in Average Daily Trips (ADT) from Near-Term development of Specific Plan
Planning Areas G and H and Planning Areas D, E and K; an increase in ADT from
Intermediate-Term development of Specific Plan Planning Areas N, I, and J; an increase in
ADT from Long-Term development of Specific Plan Planning Areas A, B and C; and, an
increase in truck traffic on Cajon Boulevard from the overall projected traffic distribution.
B\9053I39N\PJ-1Il'T jcd Apri11. 1993
17
o
o
::
2.7.2 F"undUlg5
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the potential significant traffic and circulation impacts identified in the
EIR. Furthermore, the EIR identifies impacts that are not significant and without the need
for mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted in the MMlRP in order to further
minimize these non-significant impacts.
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans (i&., the MMIRP, the
Specific Plan and Conditional Use PermitlReclamation Plan), there will be no significant
unavoidable adverse impacts on traffic and circulation.
The increase in AnT from Near-Term development of Specific Plan Planning Areas G and
H and Planning Areas D, E and K will be mitigated to a level of non-significance by
frontage road improvements along Cajon Boulevard and Institution Road (including driveway
access to Planning Areas), limitation of internal street access to Planning Areas 1 and J;
intersection improvements at Cajon Boulevard, Institution Road and Palm Avenue; and
aggregate truck routing restrictions.
The increase in ADT from the Intermediate-Term development of the Specific Plan Planning
Areas I, J, L, M, and N will be mitigated to a level of non-significance by frontage road
improvements and access road improvements along Institution Road and by the roadway
improvements implemented during the Near-Term developments.
The increase in ADT from Long-Term development of Specific Plan Planning Areas A, B
and C will be mitigated to a level of non-significance by improvement of the Cajon
Boulevard and Kendall Drive intersection and by the roadway improvements implemented
during the Near-Term and Intermediate-Term developments.
The increase in rock truck traffic south on Cajon Boulevard will be mitigated to a level of
non-significance by limiting the use of Cajon Boulevard south of Cable Creek Channel to
local deliveries and limiting the use of the Devore Road bridge (over 1-215) to use for local
deliveries.
B\90S3139N\Pl.RPT jcd April I, 1993
18
u
Q
The specific mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages
ES-33 through ES-35 (Attachment C) and Section 4.7 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve
to mitigate traffic and circulation impacts to a level of non-significance.
2.7.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The above identified potential significant traffic and circulation impacts have been eliminated
or substantially lessened to a level of less than signiticant by virtue of the mitigation
measures identified in the EIR and its components, and restated in the MM/RP. Such
measures are within the responsibility of the City and have been adopted by the City in the
MM/RP. The mitigation measures will also be imposed as Conditions of Approval in
accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.10.
The mitigation measures outline infrastructure improvements that will address project
impacts. They have been designed to anticipate background traffic volumes as currently
projected over time in accordance with current General Plan zoning in the surrounding area.
To ensure that Long-Term project development will not significantly impact the I-215/Palm
Avenue and I-15/Devore Road interchanges, the mitigation measures require a traffic study
when project related traffic reaches 10,000 ADT. In accordance with State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162, subsequent approvals implementing the project will take this data
into account. Therefore, the Council finds that these mitigations, based on data currently
available, will mitigate traffic impacts to a level of non-significance.
2.8 VISUAL RESOURCES
2.8.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The Cajon Creek Project may potentially result in the following significant visual resource
impact: alteration of visual character of the site, landform alterations, and light and glare.
Project implementation will alter views of the site when compared to existing site conditions
(i.e. undeveloped, vacant land that is disturbed). The aesthetic impact of the project may
be adverse due to its modification of views from various locations identified within the
proximate, midrange and distal locations in the project vicinity:-
B\90S3139N\PJ-RPT jcd April I. 1993
19
cJ
Q
2.8.2 Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the potential signiticant visual impacts identified in the EIR.
Furthermore, the EIR identifies impacts that are not significant and without the need for
mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted in the MM/RP in order to further
minimize these non-significant impacts.
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans (i.e., the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan, Revegetation Plan and the City's
Development Permit requirements), there will be no signiticant unavoidable adverse impacts
on visual resources.
The mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages ES-34
through ES-36 (Attachment C) and Section 4.8 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve to
mitigate these impacts to a level of non-signiticance.
2.8.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The above identified potential significant impacts to visual resources have been eliminated
or substantially lessened to a level of less than significant by virtue of the mitigation
measures identified in the EIR and its components, and restated in the MM/RP. Such
measures are within the responsibility of the City and have been adopted by the City in the
MM/RP. The mitigation measures will also be imposed as Conditions of Approval in
accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.10.
The site is not identified as a significant visual landmark or scenic vista and the project is
not in conflict with environmental plans and goals of the community identified in the City's
General Plan. Nonetheless, the project has mitigated-by-design what otherwise might be
considered potentially significant aesthetic impacts; that is, the project considers
environmentally sensitive features of the site (i.e. Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub habitat
in the floodplain area) and has included provisions for such things as conservation of open
space habitat, buffering, and landscape screening around mining areas. The Specific Plan
B\90S3139NIPI-RPT jcd April I. 1993
20
-
-
cJ
o
::
Design Guidelines also provide for aesthetic control through various use restrictions in the
Planning Areas.
Landform alteration due to mining is a potentially significant impact but is mitigated through
the implementation of the Specific Plan and the Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan,
the later of which requires backfilling (with inert material) the mining pits to a subgrade
level, phased reclamation and revegetation, buffering around the mining areas with
landscaped berming and ultimate industrial development.
The mitigation measure requiring all on-site lighting to be directed in a downward orientation
to provide direct lighting in the immediate area will reduce potential light and glare effects
upon surrounding, land uses to a level of non-significance.
The mitigation measures proposed to reduce potential visual impacts have been demonstrated
in other similar projects to be effective. They will be complied with as stated in the MM/RP
and will assure that potential aesthetic impacts will be mitigated to a level of non-
significance. Therefore, the Council finds that the mitigation will mitigate visual resources
impacts to a level of non-significance.
2.9 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
2.9.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The Cajon Creek Project may potentially result in impacts related to storage and handling
of hazardous materials used for mining, processing and at industrial developments, including:
on-site handling of fuels, greases, lubrication oils, asphalt, waste oils, solvents and concrete
additives and on-site fuel, waste oil and liquid asphalt storage tanks.
2.9.2 Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts related to storage and use of
hazardous materials identified in the ElR. Furthermore, compliance with Municipal Code
requirements, the California Health and Safety Code, the California Code of Regulations,
B\9053139N1PJ-1lPT jccI April.. 1993
21
cJ
Oi
and EPA regulations will mitigate this impact. The EIR also identifies impacts that are not
significant and without the need for mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted
in the MM/RP in order to funher minimize these non-significant impacts.
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans (i.e., the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan, and Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan), there will be no significant
unavoidable adverse impacts relating to the use and storage of hazardous materials.
The mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages ES-38
through ES-40 (Attachment C) and Section 4.10 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve to
mitigate these impacts to a level of non-signiticance.
2.9.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The above identified potential significant impacts resulting from the use and storage of
hazardous materials have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of less than
significant by vinue of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR and its components, and
restated in the MM/RP, including the federal, state, and local regulations identified therein.
Ultimate enforcement of some of the mitigation measures relating to the use, handling and
storage of hazardous materials is within the responsibility of the County Hazardous Materials
Management Division (HMMD), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB). The mitigation measures relating to the use, handling and storage of hazardous
materials within the responsibility of HMMD, EPA, SCAQMD and RWQCB, as well as
those within the control of the City, have been imposed as Conditions of Approval by the
City in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6.
Hazardous materials regulations for use, handling and storage are well-established and have
proven effective in similar contexts. These regulations will be complied with as stated in the
MM/RP in implementing the mitigation measures and will assure that hazardous materials
impacts will be mitigated to a level of non-signiticance. Therefore, the Council finds that
these impacts will be mitigated to a level of non-signiticance.
B\9053139N\PI-RPT jcd April I. 1993
22
cJ
0'
::
2.10 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
2.10.1 Potential Significant Impacts
The Cajon Creek Project may potentially result in the following significant impacts relative
to public service and utilities: increased water demand on the San Bernardino Municipal
Water District ofapproximately 1.35 MGD, wastewater generation of approximately 980,800
gallons per day and potential relocation of the 8" CalNev Petroleum Pipeline.
2.10.2 Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid
or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts related to public services and utilities
identified in the EIR. Furthermore, the ElR identifies impacts that are not significant and
without the need for mitigation, but mitigation measures have been adopted in the MM/RP
in order to further minimize these non-significant impacts.
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans Q&., the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan and Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan), there will be no significant
unavoidable adverse impacts on public services and utilities.
The mitigation measures summarized in the EIR Executive Summary "ES", pages ES-41
through ES-47 (Attachment C) and Section 4.11 of the MM/RP (Attachment D) serve to
mitigate these impacts to a level of non-signiticance.
2.10.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The above identified potential significant impacts to public services and utilities have been
eliminated or substantially lessened to a level of non-significance by virtue of the mitigation
measures identified in the EIR and its components. and restated in the MM/RP. Such
measures are within the responsibility of the City and have been adopted by the City in the
MM1RP. The mitigation measures will also be imposed as Conditions of Approval in
accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.10
B\!lO:i3139N1PJ-RPT jcd April I. 1993
23
c.J
o
The gradual implementation of the Specific Plan over a period of approximately twenty-five
years will assure that the increase in water demand and waste-water generation is phased
over the buildout period of the project. Furthermore, a commitment from the San
Bernardino Municipal Water District to supply water for the site from available sources is
required as part of project approval. The design of off-site water system enhancements
necessary to provide services to the project will be funded by the project developer; the
developer will also be responsible for construction of the on-site water distribution system,
and a proportionate share of the offsite water distribution facilities required to serve the
project. Conservation measures will be implemented through the use of drought-tolerant
plants for landscaping, and the reuse of aggregate processing water. In addition, the
mitigation measure requiring protection of the CalNev pipeline (if it is necessary to relocate
the pipeline) in accordance with CalNev policies will assure the safety and integrity of the
pipeline. Any excavation will be set back 100 feet from the pipeline to assure that the
pipeline is not in proximity to mining areas of the project site. These mitigation measures
will be complied with as stated in the MM/RP and will assure that impacts to public services
will be mitigated to a level of non-significance. Therefore, the Council finds that these
impacts will be mitigated to a level of non-signi ficance.
B\90S3139NlPI-RPr jcd April I. 1993
24
c.J
0)
3.0
UNA VOIDABLE IMPACTS WHICH CANNOT
BE REDUCED TO BELOW A LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
The Common Council finds that despite the incorporation of extensive mitigation measures
directly into the Specific Plan and Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan and those
identified in the EIR, there are several impacts that are significant and cannot be mitigated
to a level of non-significance. These significant non-mitigated impacts are in two categories:
air quality and land use. In addition, although surveys conducted to date have not found
slender-homed spineflower species on-site, there may also be significant impacts on
biological resources if the slender-homed spinetlower is found to inhabit the site. These
impacts and the measures to minimize them to the degree feasible are discussed below.
3.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
3.1.1 Significant Impacts
Implementation of the proposed mItIgation measures will reduce impacts to biological
resources to below a level of significance. However, if the slender-homed spineflower is
found to inhabit the site, a significant impact may occur.
3.1.2 Fmdings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to minimize
impacts to slender-homed spineflower habitat as identified in the EIR and its components.
In fact, based on the studies incorporated in the EIR to date, these impacts have been
mitigated to a level of non-significance. Based on the analysis presented in the EIR, there
is a low potential for the California gnatcatcher and Los Angeles pocket mouse to be present
onsite. Follow-up studies of the project site are required in order to monitor and confirm
this determination. If it is found later that individual slender-horned spineflower species
occur on the site, the applicant will be required to obtain California Department of Fish and
Game (CDFG) and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) authorization for a take
of the species pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 20sE and Section 10(a) of the
.-
B\9053139N1PJ-RPT jcd April!. 1993
25
c.J
o
Endangered Species Act, respectively, and will be required by CDFG and USFWS to
mitigate that "take" in accordance with the requirement of those statutes.
3.1.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The proposed project contains measures to minimize impacts to slender-horned spineflower
habitat. These measures are identitied in the EIR and its components, and restated in the
MM/RP. The mitigation measures establish conservation measures to minimize impacts to
potential slender-horned spineflower habitat. Such measures have been adopted as
Conditions of Approval by the City in accordance with Public Resources Code Section
21081.6. The mitigation measures reduce potential impacts to slender-horned spineflower
habitat to the maximum degree feasible, but not to a level of non-significance if the
spineflower is later found on the site.
The Council finds that the measures identitied to minimize potential loss of habitat for this
plant species will lessen the adverse impacts, however, it is not possible to provide for
buiIdout of the proposed industrial development and utilization of mineral resources without
the potential temporary disruption of the habitat should it occur onsile. The Council finds
that no additional measures are known that can further reduce potential significant impacts
to the slender-horned spineflower if it occurs onsite, without signiticantly and substantially
interfering with General Plan objectives for future development. These objectives and the
manner in which the project furthers them are set forth fully in Section III of the Specific
Plan.
3.2 AIR QUALITY
3.2.1 Significant Impacts
Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures will reduce the stationary and mobile
emissions sources. Nonetheless, significant impacts to air quality relative to dust (particulate
matter [pMIOD may occur during Santa Ana wind conditions. Additionally, even after the
implementation of trip reduction strategies (i.e. a transportation management plan) the large
number of project vehicle trips, in conjunction with other cumulative projects, would
B\90S3139N\PJ.RPT jcd April I. 1993
26
cJ 0
contribute to regional air quality degradation. Consequently, the project will have significant
cumulative impacts on air quality.
3.2.2 Findings
With implementation of the mitigation measures and applicable plans (i.e., the MM/RP, the
Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit/Reclamation Plan and Revegetation Plan), this impact
will be substantially reduced, but not to a level of non-significance. Specific economic,
social, or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation measures (other than
those proposed in Section 2.2 above) to reduce projected air quality impacts to a level of
non-significance.
3.2.3 Facts in Support of Findings
The proposed project contains measures to minimize combustion emissions and dust to
reduce the impact on ambient air quality standards, both state and federal. These measures
are identified in the Final EIR and its components, and restated in the MM/RP.
The mitigation measures establish mechanisms to minimize both vehicle travel, and air-borne
dust (PMlO) potential during Santa Ana wind conditions. Reduction of vehicle trips will be
accomplished by providing for participation in a transportation management program to
reduce emissions and improve air quality. Reduction of PM 10 will be accomplished through
implementation of the high wind response plan during Santa Ana wind conditions. Ultimate
enforcement of the mitigation measures requires compliance with SCAQMD regulations
which are within the responsibility of the SCAQMD and not the City. The mitigation
measures have been imposed as Conditions of Approval by the City in accordance with
Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. The mitigation measures reduce PMIO impacts and
vehicle emissions to the maximum degree feasible, but not to a level of non-significance.
The Council finds that the measures identified to minimize combustion emissions and dust
during Santa Ana wind conditions lessen the adverse impacts to air quality, however, it is
not possible to provide for buildout of the proposed industrial development and utilization
of mineral resources without incurring air pollutant emissions that will contribute to non-
attainment of the ambient air quality health standards. The occurrence of Santa Ana wind
B\9053139N1PJ-RPT jcd April I. 1993
27
c
o
conditions makes mitigation of dust potential and related air quality impacts to a level of non-
significance infeasible. Additionally, existing technology makes mitigation of mobile source
emissions and related air quality impacts to a level of non-signiticance infeasible. The
Council finds that no additional measures are known that can further reduce air quality
impacts for the project without significantly and substantially interfering with General Plan
objectives for future development. These objectives and the manner in which the project
furthers them are set forth fully in Section III of the Specific Plan. This consideration makes
infeasible the development of new technology as a condition of this project.
3.3 LAND USE
3.3.1 Significant Impacts
The proposed project will result in the conversion of approximately 124 acres of State
designated regionally-significant mineral resource land to other incompatible uses, i&. for
development of light and heavy industrial uses and open space. This represents a significant
unavoidable land use impact.
3.3.2 Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which lessen
the above-referenced significant environmental effect, as identified in the EIR and its
components. However, these changes or alterations cannot reduce this land use impact to
a level of non-significance.
Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible additional mitigation
measures (other than those proposed in Section 2.6 above) to reduce the land use impact
associated with loss of regionally-significant mineral resource land to other incompatible
uses.
3.3.3 Facts in Support of Findings
With the exception of the loss of use of regionally-significant mineral resource land, the
project's potential land use impacts have been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level
B\9Q53139NIPI-RPT jcd April!. 1993
28
cJ
o
'.
of non-significance by virtue of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR and restated
in the MM/RP.
The Council finds that no additional measures are known that can further reduce this impact
without significantly and substantially interfering with General Plan objectives for future
development. The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) requires that the City
adopt specific findings justifying the anticipated impairment of mineral resource recovery.
Those findings are set forth in Appendix L of the Specific Plan. The Council finds that the
loss of significant mineral resource land is an unavoidable adverse impact of adopting the
proposed project since the potential in Planning Areas A, Band J is severely constricted by
the configuration of those areas, and the complete use of Planning Area 0 for mining would
result in other significant impacts. The advantages to be gained by using those areas of the
site for industrial purposes and open space, respectively, outweigh the impairment of mineral
extraction. This consideration makes infeasible further avoidance of these mineral resources.
Bl9053139N1PJ.RPT jcd April I. 1993
29
. .
c.;
o
4.0
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
In order to make a decision whether to approve a project that will have an adverse
environmental impact, the benefits of the proposed project must be balanced against the
unavoidable, significant adverse environmental impacts. "If the benefits of a proposed
project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be
considered 'acceptable'. (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15093 (a)). Benefits from a
project are defmed as those improvements or gains to the community that would not occur
without the proposed project.
4.1 PROJECT BENEFITS
Although potential significant adverse impacts identified by the EIR, and the foregoing
Section 3.0, will not be fully mitigated [(1) potential impacts on sensitive species (i&.,
slender-homed spineflower, iffound during proposed studies) not discovered during surveys
to date, (2) individual and cumulative air quality impacts from the generation of dust during
Santa Ana wind conditions, and combustion emissions, (3) conversion of 124 acres of
mineral lands as designated by the State as regionally significant to other incompatible land
uses, the project (the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan, Conditional Use Permit!
Reclamation Plan, Tentative Parcel Maps, General Plan Amendment, Development Code
Amendment and Annexation)] will provide the following overriding social and economic
benefits to the City of San Bernardino and the region.
4.1.1 Balance of Land Uses
The long-term development plan of Specific Plan 90-01 provides for a balance of industrial,
resource extraction, and open space uses due to the following: (a) The project design
reduced incompatibilities between areas designated as mineral resource extraction by utilizing
industrial development, earthen berms, landscape screen vegetation and open space as
buffering; and, (b) The well-integrated Specific Plan Planning Area Regulations, architectural
and site design guidelines, and Development Code requirements will result in a harmonious
.-
B\9QS3139NIPI.RPr jcd April!. 1993
30
" .
c
o
physical and visual environment. Such a comprehensive development plan will be more
conducive to compatible development than piecemeal development plans.
4.1.2 Employment Opportunities
The proposed project will help achieve the General Plan objectives of providing employment
opportunities for existing and future residents of the City as a result of the following: (a)
The project provides for an estimated 5,189,300 square feet of light and heavy industrial
development which will create a projected 6,400 new on-site jobs over the estimated 25-year
industrial build-out; (b) Provisions for sand and gravel extraction and related construction
materials users will create a projected 800 new jobs; and, (c) project industrial development
will generate up to 4,600 new off-site local jobs.
4.1.3 Generation of Local Economic Opp011:unities
The employment opportunities support the City's objective to establish industrial and
manufacturing jobs to stimulate local economic opportunities. This is demonstrated by the
following: (a) Currently the local economy has a high supply of service-providing jobs
(82.5 %) and low supply of goods-producing jobs (17.5 %). The projected 6,400 industrial
and 800 mining-related jobs will require skilled and semi-skilled labor; (b) At build-out,
annual wages will total a projected $83 million (based on 1990 dollars); (c) Jobs, using
skilled and semi-skilled labor, support the creation of new local jobs in the community; and,
(d) The development of new industrial/manufacturing jobs and the provision of local jobs
will help to improve the local economy by increasing household and business spending in the
community. Increased local spending will in turn support other local jobs and business
spending. This economic multiplier effect stimulates economic activity and thereby provides
needed opportunities for the local community.
4.1.4 Development of Skilled WOl"kforce
The employment opportunities will help meet the City's objective to develop a skilled
workforce. This is supported by the fact that: (a) The project will cooperate with local job
training agencies such as the Employee Linkage Program to provide trained labor for new
firms developing at the project site; (b) Individuals selected for training can be limited to
Bl90:53139NIP1.RPT jcd April I. 1993
31
o
o
those from the local community. As the project develops over many years, there is time for
people to prepare, through education and training, and therefore be qualified to submit
employment applications when companies locate here; and, (c) Programs can be developed
through the community college, adult education and regional occupational program to prepare
young people to qualify for local jobs.
4.1.5 Improvement in the Region's Job/Housing Balance
Development of the project will create local jobs that can improve the region's job/housing
balance, for example: (a) More local jobs can reduce the amount of commuting local
residents must make to reach jobs located in Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside Counties;
and, (b) More local jobs will help meet the region's goal to reduce congestion and meet
objectives of SANBAG Congestion Management Plan and facilitate reaching air quality
standards by 2010.
4.1.6 Increased Revenues
The project will provide revenues to the City of San Bernardino because: (a) Sales Tax
revenues from sand and gravel extraction operations alone are projected to be $154,000
annually at build-out (1990 dollars); and other project industries will bring in significant sales
tax revenues; (b) If the entire project is annexed into the Redevelopment Project Area
(RDA), the City will receive $2.82 in revenues for every $1.00 of service cost (1990
dollars); and, (C) RDA revenues are projected at $2,594,655 annually at build-out (1990
dollars).
4.1.7 Utilizes Geographic Location
Development of the project will capitalize on the geographic location of San Bernardino as
an inland port, that is: (a) The location of the project just south of the junction of I-IS and
1-215 make it a prime location to service trucking arteries to Los Angeles, San Diego,
Orange County, the midwest and eastern U.S., the California Pacific Rim Ports, Mexico and
Canada; and, (b) Three major rail lines provide on-site opportunities to locate industrial
development that will utilize rail availability.
.-
B\9053139N1P1-RPJ' jcd April!. 1993
32
-'
. .
o
o
4.1.8 Public Improvements
Development of the project will provide public improvements to the area that are not there
now, including: (a) Street improvements on the project site, include the ultimate widening
of Cajon Boulevard on the project side of the centerline adjacent to each Planning Area. A
six-foot sidewalk will be built curb side. The intersection of Cajon Boulevard, Palm A venue
and Institution Road will be realigned. Palm Avenue and Institution Road will be widened
as they approach the intersection. A traftic signal will be placed at this intersection.
Institution Road will be reconstructed and widened. A six foot sidewalk will be built
curbside. Project internal streets will be built to either 40 or 50 feet curb to curb; (b) There
is the potential for railroad spurs to be constructed in areas to be served by rail lines; (c)
Water mains will be constructed along the interior streets to distribute water to the lots. In
areas where no water lines are fronting the property, water mains will be extended from the
nearest source. A new 8" water main will be extended down Institution Road; and, (d)
Sewer main will be extended from the Cable Creek Drainage Channel northerly up Cajon
Boulevard. Sewer lines will be extended to serve interior lots. An 8" sewer main will be
extended down Institution Road; and, (e) Underground storm drains will be installed that
provide capacity to carry the required 25-year frequency storm.
4.1.9 Aggregate Resources for Economic Revitalization
The proposed project provides sand and gravel needed for construction materials to build and
maintain roads, schools, industries, offices, hotels, parks, homes, etc., necessary to support
the City's goal of economic revitalization as well as the future growth projections for San
Bernardino. This is supported by the fact that: (a) A major portion of the site is designated
as a regionally-significant aggregate resource site by the State. It is currently identified as
Industrial Extractive in the City of San Bernardino General Plan; and, (b) Mining on this site
insures a continued long-term supply of low cost construction-quality sand and gravel to
supply the region's 9.5 million ton annual need.
.-
Bl1lO53139N1PJ-1lPT jcd April I. 1993
33
o
o
4.1.10
Habitat Conservation and Economic Growth
The project provides for reclamation of mined areas to provide reuse of the land as open
space or industrial sites in keeping with the City's objective for habitat conservation and
economic growth. The ultimate uses at build out will be approximately 53 percent open
space and 47 percent industrial uses.
4.1.11
Protection of Unique Environmental ResOUl'Ces
The project is designed to conserve and protect the visual character and unique
environmental resources of the Cajon Creek wash (floodplain area), that is: (a) 488 acres will
be designated as .open space within the active portions of Cajon Wash. This open space
contains sensitive Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub habitat and which supports plant and
animal species; (b) 257 additional acres will be returned to open space and revegetated as
mining occurs during in-stream extraction; (c) The proposed in-stream mining will not alter
Cajon Creek's natural stream pattern. Habitat will be restored and the area will be zoned
as open space; (d) 745 acres representing over half of the overall Specific Plan area will be
retained as natural open space and provide a protected plant and wildlife habitat for future
generations to enjoy; and, (e) A hiking and equestrian trail will provide public access
through this open space conservation area.
4.1.12
Open Space Conservation
The industrial development and open space conservation on this site will help prevent
dumping, further habitat degeneration, and environmental abuse. There is currently no open
space designated by zoning in the project area to conserve and protect the native habitat
along Cajon Creek.
B\90S3139N\PJ-RPT jcd April I. 1993
34
o
o
6.0
ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
CEQA Guidelines, Section l5l26(d) requires that ErRs describe a "range of reasonable
alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which could feasibly attain the
basic objectives to the Project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." The
Cajon Creek EIR presents a comparative evaluation of four project alternatives. These are:
. No project
. Maximum extraction
. ~c1usive industrial development
. Reduced-scale extraction
Section 6.1 through 6.4 provide findings and facts in support thereof for the above
considered alternatives:
Two additional alternatives were considered but were rejected. The first alternative
considered other sites; however, this alternative was rejected because: (a) there are no other
sites which meet the project objective of providing a balanced utilization of the unique
transportation, location, mineral resources and ecological characteristics of the project site;
(b) other possible sites have been ruled out through the General Plan process review because
the proposed location is the area of the City for which existing General Plan land use
designations come closest to approximating proposed project uses; and (c) environmental
impacts would be displaced and -- due to general plan inconsistencies -- would be greater at
other sites, rather than being avoided or reduced by moving the individual project
components to alternative sites.
The second alternative that was considered but rejected involved the siting of the mineral
processing facilities within other Planning Areas of the project site. This alternative was
rejected because overall project environmental effects would not be reduced or avoided;
however, relocating the facilities could potentially result in the non-recovery of significant
mineral resources.
B\9053139N\PJ.RPr jcd Aprill. 1993
35
o
o
::
5.1 THE NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE
The "no project" alternative is a default alternative required to be included in the analysis
by CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(d)(2). Adoption of the "no project" alternative may
result in no future industrial extractive, no industrial light and heavy development, no open
space uses, and no rail oriented uses within the project site, as this area is currently zoned
for industrial extractive and industrial uses.
Although implementation of this alternative would eliminate the project's environmental
effects, the "no project" alternative would not achieve the project objectives to fulfill the land
use designations proposed in the existing General Plan and the proposed Specific Plan. This
alternative would also not be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element goals and
objectives, as it would not encourage a cohesive pattern of development that is presented in
the proposed Specific Plan Planning Areas. It also would not allow for the use of the
regionally-significant aggregate.
Implementation of this alternative would also not assist in attaining the goals of the Air
Quality Management Plan (AQMP) which encourages placement of employment generating
land uses in housing rich areas such as the City of San Bernardino.
This alternative represents a short-term avoidance of the identified environmental effects of
the project, but would not provide any of the project benetits identified in Section 4.0, with
the exception of benefit no. 4.1.10 (Habitat Conservation and Economic Growth).
Furthennore, it is likely that the site would be developed piecemeal in the future under the
General Plan.
Consequently, although the "no project" alternative avoids environmental impacts in the
short-tenn, the long-range development opportunities would likely result in the
implementation of industrial land uses and mineral resource extraction and the attendant
environmental impacts without providing project benefits.
B\90S3139NIPI-RPT jcd April I. 1993
36
.
o
o
5.2 THE MAXIMUM EXTRACTION ALTERNATIVE
Under this alternative, all of the land within the project site that is zoned for industrial
extractive use would be mined. All of the project area is designated as a significant mineral
resource zone and is zoned for industrial-extractive uses in the San Bernardino General Plan.
The General Plan has incorporated policies for the management of these resources,
specifically the encouragement of compatible buffer-zones, and low-density interim uses.
Project objectives for conservation and protection of open space in the Cajon Creek
floodplain would not occur under this alternative. Land use compatibility impacts would
occur. For example, the open-space conservation element of the Specitic Plan and biological
mitigations would not be achieved; and visual impacts of the mining activities would not be
mitigated by industrial development buffer zones.
This alternative would not provide project benefits identified in Section 4.0, including:
benefit nos. 4.1.1 (balance ofland uses), 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 Gob opportunities associated with
industrial uses), 4.1.4 (development of workforce for industrial positions), 4.1.5 (industrial
job balance), 4.1.6 (revenue associated with industrial uses), 4.1.7 (use of geographic
location for industrial use), 4.1.8 (impairment of owner's ability to fund public
improvements), and 4.1.9 (aggregate resources for revitalization from industrial uses).
5.3 EXCLUSIVE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
Under this alternative no mineral extraction would occur and the entire site would be
developed for industrial uses and rail-access oriented businesses. The areas would be
subdivided and tentative maps would be prepared. This alternative would eliminate any
potential for mining of the site's aggregate resources, and would require the importation of
aggregate from other areas to meet the region's future needs.
Compared with the proposed project, this alternative would not be consistent with the State
significant mineral resource designation or the objectives and policies of the City of San
Bernardino General Plan. It also would not provide project benefits identified in Section 4.0,
including: benefit numbers 4.1.1 (balance of land uses), 4.1.9 (aggregate resources for
Bl90S3139N\PJ-1tPT jcd April.. 1993
37
. -
o
o
::
revitalization from industrial uses), 4.1.10 (habitat conservation and economic growth), and
4.1.11 (protection of unique environmental resources).
5.4 REDUCED-SCALE EXTRACTION
This alternative proposes the same overall project development and mmmg, with the
exception of the use of the Planning Area P for mining. Planning Area P is the largest
mining area under the proposed project, occurring within the floodplain in an area of
approximately 257 acres.
Under this alternative, the regionally significant mineral resources underlying Planning Area
P would not be mined. In terms of project objectives, this alternative would not achieve the
applicant's desire to take full advantage of the site's proximity to the freeway and railroad
networks. Implementation of this alternative would not allow the use of sand, gravel and
rock from the floodplain in accordance with the regionally-significant mineral resource
designation by the State, and would not provide the benefit of maximizing aggregate
resources for economic revitalization identified in Section 4.0, project benefit number 4.1.9.
B\9053139NIPj.RPr jcd April I. 1993
38
.
o
o
6.0
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The Common Council hereby finds that despite the incorporation of all the mlugation
measures outlined above into the project, certain environmental impacts remain which cannot
be mitigated to a level of non-significance. These impacts include: potential impacts to the
sensitive biological resources onsite (i.e., in the event the slender-homed spineflower,
California gnatcatcher or the Los Angeles pocket mouse are discovered onsite); air quality
impacts as a result of PM10 generation during Santa Ana wind conditions, and combustion
emissions and dust from vehicle trips generated as result of project development; and the
conversion of approximately 124 acres of State designated regionally-significant mineral
resource land to other incompatible uses. The City Council finds that these unmitigable
adverse impacts are outweighed by the project benefits described above and are therefore
acceptable. Furthermore, for the reasons discussed above, the project alternatives identified
in the EIR will either have greater environmental impacts than the project or will not provide
the project benefits to the same extent as the project. Therefore, as described in detail
above, these economic, social and other considerations make the project alternatives
identified in the EIR infeasible.
.-
B\9053139N1PJ.RPT jcd April.. 1993
39
."
. .
o
o
A TTACHMENT A
LOCATION OF PLANNING AREAS
BIWS3139NlP1-RYr jcd April I. 1993
"
o
o
ATTACHMENT B
PLANNING DEVELOPMENT PHASING (TABLE 2.4-2 OF DEIR)
B\90S3139N\Pl-RPT jcd April I. 1993
.
o
o
ATTACHMENT C
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FROM DEIR
B\90S3I39N\P1-RP'f jcd April). 1993
~
o
o
ATTACHMENT D
MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM
B\!I053139N1PJ-RPr jcd Aprill. 1993
BXJlI:BI:T C
ATTACHMENT 1, EXHIBIT DC"
o 0
I:SSUB FI:FTBBN: WHAT SHOULD BB THE FUNCTI:OnL ROLE. USBS PBRMI:TTBD.
AND PHYSI:CAL FORM AND CHARACTBR OJ' I:NDUSTRI:AL AND OPBN SPACB
DEVELOPMENT I:N THE CALMAT CAJON CUBE SPBCI:FI:C PLAN ARBA?
Goal
It shall be the goal of the City of San Bernardino to:
1X
Ob1ective
Provide employment opportunities within the CalMat Cajon
Creek specific Plan area for existing and future
residents of the city and those of adjacent communities.
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
1.58
.i2Al
Provide for new development of industrial and open space
uses within the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan area to
achieve 6000 employment opportunities by the year 2017.
It shall be the goal of the City of San Bernardino to:
lY
Ob1ective
Establish new industrial and open space districts for
industrial light, industrial heavy, industrial
extractive, and open space uses with mining-related
interim uses in the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan area
which meet the needs of regional and local populations.
It shall be the objective of the City of San Bernardino to:
1.59
Policie.
Provide for the development of industrial light,
industrial heavy, industrial extractive and open space
uses with mining-related interim uses within the CalMat
Cajon Creek Specific Plan area.
It shall be the policy of the City of San Bernardino to:
1.59.10
1.59.11
Permit light industrial uses as specified in the CalMat
Cajon Creek Specific Plan which serve as buffer and
ultimate development in areas designated SPIL, Specific
Plan - Industrial Light (I1.1).
Permit heavy industrial uses as specified in the CalMat
Cajon Creek Specific Plan which serve as buffer and
ultimate development in areas designated SPIH, Specific
Plan - Industrial Heavy (Il.l).
.-
1. 59 .12
1. 59 . 13
o
o
;
Permit extractive industrial uses as specified in the
CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan in accordance with the
Surface Mining And Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975 and to
meet regional demands for aggregate, sand and gravel in
areas designated SPIE, Specific Plan Industrial
Extractive (I1.1).
Permit open space uses as specified in the CalMat Cajon
Creek Specific Plan to ensure the conservation and
enhancement of natural resources and to provide enjoyment
of such resources in areas designated SPOS, Specific Plan
- Open space (I1.1).
-.. '-' ~~..;._..... ...,
o
. Iii
!llllII /
.1111111. .
-,
l::~'~~;.~.~..\
ii, ...'
'If r-, I
{" / :"':-"1
\ ,t;:~: .:.: ';
j.." .
! .....~...~,.,
~~
. fJ"~
~v
~l
J't
~
'.
'~
'",e
I~
,C
-.'-( "
l'
ll..
~
I
W
)/..
.'
ATTACHMENT I, EXHIBIT "E"
o 0
PARCEL 1
IE TO SP
(ASSESSOR.' S PCL.
BOOK 262-011-38
BOOK 348-151-01,02
NORTHEAST OF ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY)
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 37, RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7,
PAGE 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY IN BOOK 43 PAGE 18 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO.
457 FILED IN BOOK 4 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 93 DECEMBER 10, 1970 IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE
ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 457 AND BLOCK 33 MAP
OF DEVORE MAP BOOK 17, PAGES 79 AND 80 NORTH 15'42'25" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 1218.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG THE EXTENSION OF SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH
15'42'25" EAST A DISTANCE OF 924.50 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION
WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD, KNOWN AS U. S.
HIGHWAY 66, 90 FEET WIDE, THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
SOUTH 47'07'38" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5491.02 FEET TO A POINT OF
INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "P" IN BLOCK 12, OF A
RESUBDIVISION OF MEYER AND BARCLAY, SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAPS
RECORDED IN BOOKS 7 AND 12, PAGES 23 AND 18, RESPECTIVELY OF MAPS,
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY: THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LAND CONVEYED TO MILTON
M. PATE AND WIFE BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1947 IN BOOK 2131,
PAGE 118 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN
.-
o
o
BERNARDINO COUNTY SOUTH 42052'22" WEST 227.51 FEET; THENCE LEAVING
SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 47011'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 6024'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 800037 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA
FE RAILWAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
::
o
o
::
(Assessor's Tax Pcls.
Book 262-011-42,43,44,45
Book 262-042-15, 17
Book 348-151-23
Northwest of Southern Pacific Railroad
And San Bernardino County Flood Control
District Right-of-Way)
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 37, RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7,
PAGE 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY IN BOOK 43 PAGE 18 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 2
IE to SP
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO.
457 FILED IN 'BOOK 4 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 93 DECEMBER 10, 1970 IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE
ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 457 AND BLOCK 33 MAP
OF DEVORE MAP BOOK 17, PAGES 79 AND 80 NORTH 15042'25" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 950.41 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 49026'53" EAST A DISTANCE
OF 1,578.19 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1834.91 FOOT RADIUS
CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22020'12" AN ARC LENGTH OF 715.34 FEET
TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 25052'37" EAST A DISTANCE OF
871.79 FEET TO A POINT ON A NONTANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE
CONCAVE EASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 78025'29"
WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
37039'20" AN ARC LENGTH OF 197.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
NONTANGENT 2160.08 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A
RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 63 055' 11" WEST; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35016'10"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 1594.14 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT
2400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8054' 49"
AN ARC LENGTH OF 373.37 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN BEING DESIGNATED AS
o
o
POINT "A"; THENCE LEAVII!TG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 2.30'34"
WEST A DISTANCE OF 445.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89.20'47" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 459.10 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SAID
POINT BEING ON A 2400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY,
A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 52027' 13" EAST; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21.12'05" AN
ARC LENGTH OF 888.09 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH
16.20'22" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1164.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73.39'38"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 133.89 FEET TO A POINT ON A 3,919.75 FOOT RADIUS
CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS
SOUTH 61.13 '47" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24003 '56" AN ARC LENGTH OF 1646.39 FEET TO A
POINT OF NON TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 53.08' 43" EAST A DISTANCE OF
70.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53027'33" EAST 605.90 FEET MORE OR LESS TO
A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO ALVA H.
WILSON PER DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1950; DEED NO. 2692, PAGE 569
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, SAID
POINT HEREIN BEING DESIGNATED AS POINT "B"; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 38037'51" WEST A DISTANCE OF 3164.64 FEET
MORE OR LESS TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY GLEN
HELEN RANCH LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY GLEN HELEN RANCH LINE
NORTH 22026'33" WEST A DISTANCE OF 7,159.52 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING
ALONG THE EASTERLY GLEN HELEN RANCH LINE NORTH 42042'16" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 4,680 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT.
o
o
PARCEL 3
IE to SP
(Ass~ssor's Tax Pels.
Book' 262-011-39, 40 and 41)
~:
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 37, RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7,
PAGE 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY IN BOOK 43 PAGE 18 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "A" (SEE PARCEL 2); THENCE
NORTH 2030 '34" WEST 281. 85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY
LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT
BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON A
2646.52 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO
SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 34000'09" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5030' 52" AN ARC LENGTH OF
254.72 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 61030'43" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 1234.54 FEET TO A POINT ON A 1960.08 FOOT RADIUS CURVE
CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH
18016'37" WEST, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD; THENCE EASTERLY
ON SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
7059'26" AN ARC LENGTH OF 273036 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY;
THENCE SOUTH 79042'49" EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.49 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 5,679.68 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 7055'07" AN ARC LENGTH OF 784096 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 2030'34" WEST A DISTANCE OF
407.26 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGo
o 0
PARCEL 4 (ASS~SSOR'S TAX PCLS.
IL TO SP BOOK 262-042-3,14,16)
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 37, RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7,
PAGE 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY IN BOOK 43 PAGE 18 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "B" (SEE PARCEL 2); THENCE
ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO ALVA H. WILSON
PER DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1950; DEED NO. 2692 PAGE 569 IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, NORTH
38.37'51" EAST A DISTANCE OF 150.27 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY,
SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OP BBGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING
ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO ALVA H. WILSON
NORTH 38"37'51" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1059"07 FEET; THENCE NORTH
38"36'39" EAST A DISTANCE OF 300"09 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD; THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD NORTH 51"21'58" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 2185.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51"23 '36" WEST A DISTANCE OF
657 "25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 52"40'38" WEST A DISTANCE OF 349.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 44"27'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 419"97 FEET; THENCE
LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE SOUTH 89"20'47" WEST A DISTANCE OF
287.73 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SAID POINT BEING ON A
2646"52 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO
SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 57"43'24" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
15"55'55" AN ARC LENGTH OF 735"90 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY;
THENCE SOUTH 15"21'32" A DISTANCE OF 280"51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING
OF A 3719"75 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12"26'16"
AN ARC LENGTH OF 807"48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52"26'23" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 39.81 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON A 3769.75 FOOT
o
o
RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NO~THEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT
BEARS SOUTH 60 "42' 36" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23"34'45" AN ARC LENGTH OF 1551.38 FEET
TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 53"17'14" EAST A DISTANCE OF
69.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53"27'33" EAST A DISTANCE OF 611.31 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING"
.-
--
o
o
PARCEL 5 .. (ASSESSOR'S TAX PCLS
PROPERTY TO BE LEASED BOOK 262-042-POR. 10,11)
FROM COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ALL THAT PROTION OF SECTION 11 TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH RANGE 5 WEST OF LOT
37 IN RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGE 23 OF MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "B" (SEE PARCEL 2); THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO
ALVA H. WILSON PER DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1950, DEED NO. 2692
PAGE 569 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY, SOUTH 38037' 51" WEST A DISTANCE OF 3164.54 FEET TO A POINT
OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY GLEN HELEN RANCH LINE; THENCE
ALONG THE GLEN HELEN RANCH LINE SOUTH 22002 '10" EAST A DISTANCE OF
2,387.88 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY GLEN HELEN RANCH LINE
NORTH 51006'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3,530 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57024'
WEST A DISTANCE OF 1680 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13006' EAST A DISTANCE
OF 1240 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
NORTH 53027'33" WEST A DISTANCE OF 670 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT.
o
o
(Assessor.'s Tax Pcls.
Book 262-051-POR. 29
East of Southern Pacific
Railroad Right-of-Way)
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 37, RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
PARCEL 6
IH TO SP
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7,
PAGE 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 11 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL
PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT
OF WAY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD, KNOWN AS U.S. HIGHWAY 66, 90 FEET
WIDE, WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INSTITUTION ROAD;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
SAID INSTITUTION ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 37 CONVEYED TO THE
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 1965 IN
BOOK 6490, PAGE 203 AND ALSO CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED JULY 8, 1965
IN BOOK 6659, PAGE 336 ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
NORTHEASTERLY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO BY DEED RECORDED JULY 27, 1948 IN BOOK 2268, PAGE
138 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO A
POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
SAID CAJON BOULEVARD; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT.
o
o
PARCEL 7 (Assessor's Ta~ Pcls.
Book 262-051-27, Por. 29
IE TO SP East of Southern Pacific
Railroad Right-of-Way)
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 37, RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7,
PAGE 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 11, 12 AND 13,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING
TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, IS SAID SECTION LINES WERE EXTENDED
ACROSS SAID LAND, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT
OF WAY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD, KNOWN AS U.S. HIGHWAY 66, 90 FEET
WIDE, WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO
FARM HOMES CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 1934 IN BOOK
1011, PAGE 14, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CAJON
BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 250 FEET TO THE TRUB POrR'.l' OF BBGrNNUIG;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD A DISTANCE OF 5511 FEET MORE OR LESS TO
A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF INSTITUTION
ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID
INSTITUTION ROAD TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE
OF THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 37 CONVEYED TO THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC
COMPANY, BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 1965 IN BOOK 6490, PAGE 203
AND ALSO CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED JULY 8, 1965 IN BOOK 6659, PAGE
336 ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE IN A SOUTHERLY
DIRECTION TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE
o
o
AFOREMENTIONED PARCEL CO~YED TO SAID FARM HOMES CORPORATION, OR
THE PROLONGATION THEREOF; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE
OF SAID PARCEL CONVEYED TO FARM HOMES CORPORATION, TO A POINT OF
INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED
LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 200
FEET WIDE DESCRIBED IN JUDGEMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION,
RECORDED DECEMBER 21, 1972 IN BOOK 8086, PAGE 946, OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.
ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NOS. 1, 2 AND 3 IN
THE DEED TO SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED
FEBRUARY 7, 1973 IN BOOK 8116, PAGE 998, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.
o
o
(ASSESSOR'S TAX PCLS.
BOOK 262~051-POR. 27, 30
BOOK 262-061-41, 42
BOOK 262-211-08)
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 37, RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
PARCEL 8
IE TO SP
BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7,
PAGE 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 11, 12, 13 AND 14, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE
OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT
OF WAY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD, KNOWN AS U.S. HIGHWAY 66, 90 FEET
WIDE, WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY CONVEYED
TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY DEED RECORDED JULY 27, 1948 IN
BOOK 2268, PAGE 138 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
SOUTHWESTERLY OF THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 37 CONVEYED TO THE
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 1965 IN
BOOK 6490, PAGE 203 AND ALSO CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED JULY 8, 1965
IN BOOK 6659, PAGE 336, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGIRHING: THENCE CONTINUING FROM SAID TRUE POINT SOUTHWESTERLY
ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
EASTERLY GLEN HELEN RANCH LINE; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
EASTERLY GLEN HELEN RANCH LINE TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO FARM
HOMES CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 13r 1934 IN BOOK 1011,
o
o
::
PAGE 14 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO A
POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT PORTION OF
SAID LOT 37 CONVEYED TO THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, IN THE COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN
BOOK 7 OF MAPS, PAGE 23, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY AND BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 13 AND 14, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 5 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
CONVEYED TO CHARLES S. OLDER, ET AL BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 3,
1949, IN BOOK 3374, PAGE 365 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE
OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO OLDER SOUTH 18'45' EAST, A DISTANCE OF
3081.38 FEET; THENCE DUE EAST 100 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14'22'30" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 2,361.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75'37'30" EAST A DISTANCE
OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14'22'30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 698.65
FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LAND
CONVEYED TO OLDER; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 89'45' WEST
A DISTANCE OF 2045.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT.
o
c)
1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING CHAPTER
19.10 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (TITLE 19 - THE
3 DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO ADD SECTION 19.10.030 (5) TO ESTABLISH THE
CALMAT CAJON CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (SP, SPECIFIC PLAN - CALMAT CAJON
4 CREEK PROJECT) LAND USE DESIGNATIONIZONE, PERMITTED USES,
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES.
5
6
2
THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
7
8 as follows:
SECTION 1.
Page II-155 BB, Section 19.06.030(5), is amended
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 IIII
24 IIII
25 IIII
26 IIII
27
28
a)
Add new Item 5.
"5.
SD.aifia Plan No. 90-01. Calaat Ca10D Creek
This specific Plan district is intended to provide for
the development of industrial light, industrial heavy,
industrial extractive and open space uses with mininq-
related interim uses within the CalMat Cajon Creek
Specific Plan Area and to provide employment
opportunities within the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan
area for existinq and future residents of the City and
those of adjacent communities. The CalMat Cajon Creek
Specific Plan establishes land use districts, permitted
uses, development standards and desiqn quidelines for the
Specific Plan area and is incorporated herein by
reference."
1
o
o
1 ORDINANCE. . . AMENDING CHAPl'ER 19. 10 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL
CODE (TITLE 19 - THE DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO ADD SECTION 19.10.030(5)
2 TO ESTABLISH THE CALMAT CAJON CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN (SP, SPECIFIC
PLAN - CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT) LAND USE DESIGNATION/ZONE,
3 PERMITTED USES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES.
4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted
5 by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
6 meeting, therefore, held on the day of
7
, 1993, by the following vote to wit:
8 Council Members:
9
ADa
HAU
ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA
10 REILLY
11 HERNANDEZ
12
13
MAUDSLEY
MINOR
14 POPE-WDLAM
15
16
MILLER
17
18 of
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
city Clerk
The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this
, 1993.
day
w. R. Holcomb, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to
form and legal content:
JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
By:
.-
28
2
o
o
SPECXAL PURPOSES DXSTRXCTS-l'.10
5. s~.cific Plan Ro. 10-01. Calmat Ca10D Creek
This Specific Plan district is intended to provide for the
development of industrial light, industrial heavy, industrial
extractive and open space uses with mining-related interim
uses within the CalMat cajon Creek Specific Plan Area and to
provide employment opportunities within the CalMat Cajon Creek
specific Plan area for existing and future residents of the
city and those of adjacent communities. The CalMat Cajon
Creek specific Plan establishes land use districts, permitted
uses, development standards and design guidelines for the
Specific Plan area and is incorporated herein by reference.
n-155BB
ATTACHMENT 5 "B"
c::> ..
o
CU_ .el_ Bloal'lnlater aJlphith_ter
.. 2575 Devore Roa4
8aa BeraardiDo, Cl 92407-1539
~elephoDe (909) 880-&500
March 10, 1993
The Honorable W. R. Holcomb
Mayor of San Bernardino
300 North nDn Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
GI
I n~
-I'
L.:tJ
~ ':-:1 '":)
~ ;.J " _ :I :-...
. .1 .'
- r-
".; ,~
_J ; u' I
i 'i J
~j
/
/
/
,
/
Mi~R f 5 1~93
RE: CalMat Cajon Creek Project
Dear Mayor Holcomb:
~i!ri);~S;X%~,T::?J:;~O &
/
.//
I would like to take a moment of your time to express my concerns
reqardinq the CalMat Cajon Creek project scheduled for action by
-the city of San Bernardino on April 5, 1993.
I am concerned that in the reviews/reports qenerated reqardinq the
CalMat project, Glen Helen Blockbuster Amphitheater, an outdoor
performinq arts facility, was not addressed. We and the County of
San Bernardino would like to ensure that our facility has been
taken into proper consideration in your review/approval process.
The amphitheater will feature live musical performances qenerally
occurrinq durinq weekday and weekend eveninqs from approximately
6:00-11:00 p.m. To ensure our patrons receive the hiqhest quality
experience, we need to understand the potential impacts of truck
traffic and dust on our operation.
I would be pleased to meet with you or someone from your department
to discuss the impacts of the CalMat Cajon Creek Project on our
amphitheater.
sincerely,
~.,
Dominic Roncace
Amphitheater Entertainment Corporation
DR: SHM: shm
.-
"
o
o
CalMat Cajon Creek Project
Page 2
March 10, 1993
cc: John Tombari, Blockbuster Entertainment Corporation
Jon D. Mikels, County of San Bernardino, Board of
Supervisors
Judy Gilbert, County of San Bernardino, Board of Supervisors
Al Boughey, City of San Bernardino, Planning Department
Debra Woldruff, city of San Bernardino, Planning Department
"REGI(;N~L P~RKS DEP9RTMENT
e.o ~: \llilil.,,;..
IU..
'\,)AI. b II ro- k..J
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
PUIUC WORKS GROUP
"-825 E."n ThIrd SINet . .... 8emwdlno. CA 92415.0833 ~. 17141 38.pARKS 1387.27571
Fax 17141 387.2052
E. JAY EWNGTON
Director
March 8, 1993
Mayor W. R. Holcomb
city Hall
300 N. "0" street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
[ffi~rm~~\I?~rm
MAR 1 0 1993 lW
CITY OF SAN bt.HI\lJo\~IJINO
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING &
BUILDING SERVICES
Dear Mr. Holcomb:
Please let this letter serve as an issue letter concerning the Cal-
Mat project slated for action by the city of San Bernardino on
AprilS, 1993. As Director of San Bernardino County Regional Parks
Department, my staff and I have several issues concerning the
development of the Cal-Mat proposed project in the area just north
of Glen Helen Regional Park.
Our main issue is traffic congestion around the park during peak
park event uses. our event uses will range from crowds of 5,000 to
60,000. The events include the Renaissance Pleasure Faire, July
the Fourth, Blockbuster Amphitheatre concerts and major Off-Highway
Vehicle (OHV) events. With the Cal-Mat project placing a high
demand on cajon BOUlevard, Kendall Drive, Institution Road and
Devore Road entrances and exits to I-215, our primary concern is
during our same peak traffic needs for the same Interstate on and
off ramps and the secondary surface streets.
With peak crowds ingressing and exiting the park areas in a one to
two hour peak flow we would ask that you consider requiring Cal-Mat
to stop the flow of trucks from these Cal-Mat Project during events
that exceed 7,500 anticipated attendees. The average time of
duration of the events will range from four to six hours. The
basic daily use time is afternoon into evening (11:00 p.m.), and
the primary weekly occurrence days are on Saturday and Sunday.
Other traffic concerns include the need for additional circulation
for ingress and egress to the parking facilities located in cajon
Wash. We would ask you to consider requesting Cal-Mat to construct
a levee road along the north park property boundary between Devore
Road and Institution Road. This mitigation would reduce Cal-Mat's
impact on park events. The access road to the park should be
constructed to aid in traffic circulation to our 50,000+ major
events, and would assist in not mixing Cal-Mat traffic and event
traffic. The increased number of trips on Institution Road are
also of concern and we would like to request that you consider, as
a requirement, to widen Institution Road to four (4) lanes and
construct an all weather crossing in the cajon Wash Area.
;':':'.F~V '..... lJ;AYS
':.eMAH. G. WA:"tr-.ER
M~P.SI'tA TUROCI
JON D. MIKELS. . .
Bo.rd of Supervisors
. first District BARBARA CRAM RIOReAN . . . . . Thir:l ~i:5;:fi.::
. Second District LARRY W/.,LKER. . . . . . . . . Four:h ~i!T!;C"t
ROBERT L. HAMMDCK . . . . . . . . . Filth District
':,:~", ;;0;;:',,' :'.'a:;\( ~'~j,...:!
':"!!.', .~_.~ ;'.:""- ".,~..'<:',...( C~.'f'
::. ~_ ': ':::'~s :':':"':;0
~
o
o
,
.
...
CAL-KAT PROJECT
March 8, 1993
Page 2
Our planning efforts in the Devore area in connection with
hike/bike and equestrian trails have shown us the need to develop
connector trails along the Cajon Creek Wash to connect to the Santa
Ana River Trail system. We request you to consider requiring Cal-
Mat to provide these secondary trails through their project. Other
concerns and issues have been raised by other County Departments.
Please have a City Staff Planner contact us to discuss these and
other issues we have.
Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to bring these issues to
your attention. I look forward to working with you to solve these
concerns.
YOUR
D.~~N'
INGTO~C.L.P.
San Bernardino City Council Members
Rachel Clark, San Bernardino City Clerk
Shauna Clark, San Bernardino City Administrator
Al Bouqhey, San Bernardino City Pl
Jim Campise, California Highway Patrol
Dominic Roncace, Amphitheater Entertainment Corporation
Valery Pilmer, San Bernardino County Planning Department
Jon D. Mikels, San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors
EJE: smr
cc
a:ho1comb.eje
File: 20-15.8
~
o
o
01 March 1993
RECE1V~" ('01'/'1, EFr
::
-
.
Mayor and City Council
City of San Bernardino
300 North I D I Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
'93 MAR -2 A8 :59
.- ,-, ,- r 'Ii' r' ill]
~D 1',,:f::S:: li/:i:' rll,
,. " ...., I
. ,...,--
! n I R 0 2 1'~'" "
U L\ MA :.:J
,,;rr (' c;: 5;.:..,\ ~~;:;~..:;..~n:'.:J
:);:P',.\:;:.:,'.:,:~,.:1' c.; ":; ..\~. -.
C~;i~_~,;';:: S;';';~"i......:::
, "
..........
RE: Planning Commission approval of Specific Plan No. 90-
001, Gen. Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code Amendment
No. 92-06, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31/Reclamation
Plan, and Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107, 14108,
Mayor Holcomb and Council Members:
I wish to formally appeal the decision to approve the above
referenced action by the Planning Commission on 16 February
1993. I believe that this action was taken without appropriate
consideration of the potentially harmful effects that this
project would subject the residents and City of San Bernardino
to. I would request that more intensive review be given
to the project impact areas concerning biologicals and habitat
destruction, air quality, hydrology, transportation, and
visual asthetics. I contend that the Planning Commissioners
failed to properly weigh the negative impacts of this project
against the potential economic benefits to the City and
thus, gave approval that possibly is in conflict with CEQA
guidelines concerning such projects. Furthermore, I question
whether the project, as submitted, does itself conform to
CEQA guidelines. I look forward to the opportunity to discuss
this matter more fully with you and request that such discussions
be held in a public setting so as to afford my neighbors
in San Bernardino the chance to express both similar or
opposing concerns.
Stewart D. Cumming
Cimarron Ranch
4377 North Cristy Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92405
cc: City Clerk
file
-, .............. 0 0
,
! Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corporation's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
NAME ADDRESS
1, "A_~ ~r/vl 4404 IV~1~ ,?H'
("...X/f,tjlV> f Cr-r{ '1175 10. Cr,~--rf{ AlI'f
d.&.. 7>~ '146r,1,i a~1 ~.
( ~J. A-~I N c~\..\ ~;NL
DATE
l.' /</i?
(2 i/5/13
.?/;':;/13
2--/S--q3 (,/
~ '"/{ ... tj 3 BIL}A~ LewD
2.... IS - q"'S \,-\; t:.k. e I S I: t~
2 - /)- '73 7//t.J'W ~ hi,
:L\~ -S~ -~6rf'>.. L,-S*~ ::J~gJ Lt.). t1yblr^ Ptl~
. ").-/:;-- 9~ '1t.dvt- a/~~ :).71 ~ tJ- /1;/lmLA /IU:
d-/-.~3 ~~ ~J"" t<J.fu< ~-
J.- 1~-~1, (\;'\~'o:o'JS. ~~ '-'. Po.'\! ~.
;2 - IT - 9.3 /J1.",. c /?tto . 7 / ~/~~ d96r-,,).. ~~k.... IJve.
I
. ~ /1/- U ~r- 4t--c
2 'i'<..c1 vJ PO,l"~/", lWe.
2b6$"" Lv. P'o".1'"lQ II".
2 gS' ? LV. f'/lA'~tA Aile.
./..1"",,, tT'tA ~_.I. "'
o
o
.
01 March 1993
Mayor and City Council
City of San Bernardino
300 North 'D' Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: Planning Commission approval of Specific Plan No. 90-
01, Gen. Plan Amendment No. 91-18, Development Code Amendment
No. 92-06, Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31/Reclamation
Plan, and Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107, 14108.
Mayor Holcomb and Council Members:
I wish to formally appeal the decision to approve the above
referenced action by the Planning Commission on 16 February
1993. I believe that this action was taken without appropriate
consideration of the potentially harmful effects that this
project would subject the residents and City of San Bernardino
to. I would request that more intensive review be given
to the project impact areas concerning biologicals and habitat
destruction, air quality, hydrology, transportation, and
visual asthetics. I contend that the Planning Commissioners
failed to properly weigh the negative impacts of this project
against the potential economic benefits to the City and
thus, gave approval that possibly is in conflict with CEQA
guidelines concerning such projects. Furthermore, I question
whether the project, as submitted, does itself conform to
CEQA guidelines. I look forward to the opportunity to discuss
this matter more fully with you and request that such discussions
be held in a pUblic setting so as to afford my neighbors
in San Bernardino the chance to express both similar or
opposing concerns.
Sincerely,
.
Stewart D. cumm~
Cimarron Ranch
4377 North Cristy Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92405
ITa rn~rn~wrn lID
MAR 0 2 1993
cc: City Clerk
fi 1e
ep"y Of! 5AN e!!p.N/I.RO:~O
DEP~RTMF.Nl OF P~ANNING 8.
, alJ\~OING SERViCES
-.
o
o
" '
_':l ~\. --, ..
'.~__\:;..J
-"
~
~
BIR
[fJ..,.,",~-~
- I~ ;..... I: /I "'7 .,
~A:: :/,~/ @
'1.-, i ,l" '/I"~'" I~ ,,- ;on
~... . .. 'T ....""" --....~l
February 26, 1993
CITY Or SAN
DEPARTMENT O~ERNAAD'NO
BUILDING ".I1P~ANNING &
~c VICES
Honorable Mayor and Members of the city Council
300 North "0" street
San Bernardino, CA
92418
reI CalMat Cajon creek Project Specific Plan 90-01
Dear Mayor and Members of the Council:
On the recommendation of Frank Williams, BIA Governmental Affairs
Director for the Valley Reqion, the above mentioned project was
unanimously endorsed by ~e BIA Board of Directors at it. February
25, 1993 meetinq and qave its full support for this project for the
followinq reasons:
1. Jobs
This project will qenerate 11,000 n.w job..
At a time when forecasts continue to indicat. that in
1993, there will be continued jOb 10.... and .low incom.
qrowth -- not the best scenario for p.opl. to ..11 a
house -- we need to do all w. can to promote and provide
jobs for our city and county. (.e. attach.d January 7,
1993 Inland Valley Daily Bulletin articl.).
2. Open Space
488 acres will be left untouched. A contiquou.
257 acres will be reveqetated with native
plantinqs upon completion of sballow mininq.
This will form a permanent 745 acr. open spac.
wildlife corridor alonq Cajon Creek. Thi. mak..
up for over balf of the entire proj.ct acr.aq..
3. Revenues to the City of San Bernardino
Sales and property taxes from this project, a. well as
from the projected industrial development, will be a
source of siqnificant new revenues.
4. CalMat is and will continue to be a respon.ible Corporat.
Citizen. ~
-
9227 Hoven Avenue. Suite 280 . Roncho cucomongo. Colifomio 91730 . (714) 945-1884 . FAX (714) 948-9631
,
o
o
.
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City council
February 26, 1993
Page 2
The requirements of the Specific Plan insure that the area's much
needed industrial growth will take place according to a well
conceived and environmentally sensitive plan. The specific
p;Lanning area regulations insure high standards of quality and
control as well as making it possible for everyone to know, well in
advance, what types of development are envisioned for the future.
CalMat has taken extraordinary steps to design their project to
conserve the natural wildlife habitat corridor while providing jobs
and building material to help meet the economic qoals and objective
of our reqion.
It is especially crucial that we all support job qeneratinq
opportunities in these hard economic times; therefore, we urqe you
to qive your support to this project.
Sincerely,
~.. ~.A~'u
william G. Bethel
Executive Officer
WGB:fw
',BRUARY 16, 1993
o
o
OITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING COMMISSION
..'
RE: PROPOSED CAL MAT PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS ARE NECESSARY AND VITAL IN ORDER TO PROTECT RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES.
HAS THE E.I.R. ADDRESSED THE SPECIES OF FUNGUS THAT GROWS IN .~HIS REGION THAT CAUSES A DEADLY
DISEASE OF COCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS? THIS DISEASE IS ALSO KNOWN AS VALLEY FEVER OR THE SAN JOAQUIN
VALLEY FEVER. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT HAS NOT ADDRESSED.Tijrs FUNGUS, THEN THE REPORT IS
INCOMPLETE.
THIS LIFE THREATENING FUNGUS LIVES IN THE SOIL 3-4 INCHES BEtOW THE SURFACE AND COMES CLOSER
TO THE SURFACE AFTER A RAINFALL. WHEN THE SURFACE IS DISRUPTED BY MINING, CONSTRUCTION,
TRAFFIC AND WIND, THE FUNGUS BECOMES AIR BORNE AND INFECTS THE. PERSON BY THE AIR THEY BREATH.
THE INFECTION CAN ALSO BE TRANSMITTED BY THOSE INFECTED BY OP~~ SORES AND DRAINING SINUSES.
THE SYMPTOMS OF THIS DISEASE RESEMBLE THE FLU. IT CAN BE ACCOMPANIED BY HIGH FEVER. CHILLS,
HEADACHE, COUGH, SEVERE BONE' JOINT PAIN, CHEST PAINS, SORE 1PROAT, AND WEIGHT LOSS. IT CAN
ATTACK THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, CAUSE PNEUMONIA' ATTACK THB MENINGES OF THE BRAIN. IT IS
A VERY NASTY DISEASE THAT NOT ONLY MAKES YOU EXTREMELY SICK, BUT ALSO KILLS 2' OF THE PEOPLE
THAT COME DOWN WITH IT. DURING THE US FESTIVAL, MANY PEOPLE IN THE AREA AND PEOPLE WHO
ATTENDED THE FESTIVAL CAME DOWN WITH IT BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC'THAT SENT THE DUST PARTICLES
INTO THE AIR. THAT WAS ONLY A THREE DAY EVENT. CAt MAT WILL B~'DIGGING IN THE WASH 7 DAYS A
WEEK, 24 HOURS A DAY - SENDING THIS DEADLY FUNGUS INTO THE AIR, THAT WE BREATH.
MANY OF THE CASES GO UNREPORTED BECAUSE IT IS RARE, RESEMBLI!:S'THE FLU AND IS OnEN
MISDIAGNOSED. BUT, ACCORDING TO THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT. IN 1991 TRERE WERE 113 CASES OF
"
COCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS REPORTED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. IN 1992 THERE WERE 32 CASES.
THIS MAY NOT SEEM LIKE MUCH NOW, BUT ACCORDING TO LINDA MURPHY OF THE COUNTY HEALTH
DEPARTMENT. THE REASON WHY THERE WAS SUCH A LARGE INCREASE OF CASES IN 1991 WAS DUE TO THE
FACT TRAT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RAD A RUGE EPIDEMIC OF COCCiDIOIDOMYCOSIS IN THAT YEAR. THE
STATE RAD OVER A THOUSAND REPORTED CASES, THE REASON FOR THE EPIDEMIC WAS BECAUSE THERE WAS A
ENORMOUS DUST STORM THAT BLEW IN THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY THAT SENT THIS DISEASE INTO THE AIR.
SRE SAID THAT ANYBODY WRO PASSED THROUGH THE PASS (THE GRAPEVINE) CAME DOWI WITH THE DISEASE.
TRE CAJON PASS IS A REAVILY TRAVELED AREA. IT IS KNOWN AS THE CORRIDOR TO CANADA AND TRE
ENTIRE COUNTRY. WE ARE KNOWN FOR OUR STRONG WINDS AND DUST STORMS. IF THIS PROJECT IS
APPROVED, HOW MANY PEOPLE IN SAN BERNARDINO, DEVORE. VERDEMONT, CIMMERON RANCH. MUSCOY AND THE
REST OF THE VALLEY AND THE REST OF THE COONTRY WILL HAVE TO SOFFER AND DIE FROM THIS DISEASE?
ARE YOU. AS MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. PREPARED FOR AN EPIDEMIC OF THIS MAGNITUDE?
I URGE YOO. FOR THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THIS CITY AND COUNTY TO OPPOSE AND
DEFEAT THIS PROJECT.
S;,ERELY. D V~
~Mlll() L'Jlf4!Y
SOSAN ENKOSKY
787 KIMBARK AVE.
DEVORE, CA 92407
,,'
.
,'-
. .
"
.-
---
dc~ ~ '~('d:i(j):t'~ ~ ev.e<f€/o-rclUz of j61tllLlXhf-(
91l.uilcl'lli.-{ 71c1"~a1~~"bod I -.n:,1:~0ID:r- {I ~ I 841
and a specific .iolet-to-plnk color is obtained by -",",0'- (ko"kar-sln'o-Jen. ko-kar'.in-o-gen")
adding a solution 01 the p-nltrophenylhydrazone 01 lco- with. together + comnogm,lrom Gr. br~in'"
dlacetylmonoxlme. Altemately. alter remo.al 01 crab + g<rnnon to producel an agent that Is not In
Iron. copper. and nlckellnterlerences. blue-colored Itself carcinogenic but Increases the ellect 01 a car-
cobalt thiocyanate can be lormed and the concen- c1nogen.perhaps by rendering tissue more .usceptl-
tratlon determined by measuring the absorbance at ble to th~ primary carcinogen. or by encouraging
625 nm. the multiplication of tran.lormed cell.. Many .ub-
ooba1_trlte ...-04 (ko"bawl-t1-nl'trit) a hlSlO- stances tllat were considered cocarclnogen. are no..
logic .talnlng procedure that uses a cobaltinltrlte conslder~ 10 be promoters. See also lu.......". under
reagent (cobaltout nitrite. sodium nitrite. and acetic promoln'.
acid) to demon.trate potaSSium a. birefringent, _/L _/0 IGr. loU", grain. seedl a word ele-
chrome-yellow potassium cobaltlnltrlte cry.tal.. ment u~ In combining form to denote relationship
ooba1- .blorl4o a salt, CaCI.. formerly used to to COCCOid bacteria. e.g.. .tre)llococcl.
treat certain anemias: It produces polycythemia by __ (i'Dk'a\) resembling or pertaining to cocci.
.tlmulatlngerythropoletln production. Presumably 0....41& (kok-.ld'e-ah) [pI. of N.L. cocr:Ull..... from
cobaltou. chloride Inhibits enzymesln.ol.ed In oxl- COCCUI grain. seed! a .ube"" of.porozoa exhibiting
datl.e metaboll.m. thereby causing tissue hypoxia, alternatlorr of leneratlons with sexual and asexual
which results In increased secretion of erythropole- stages of the life cycle. It contains the order Eucoc-
tin. cldla. wMch contains the suborders Elmerllna (In-
COBOL [acronym from .....mmon bu.l..... oriented c1udlftl tHe parasitic .pecI" of the pnera ElmnWI.
language! a computer prclf8mmlng lansuage de- 1.-ra. and ~) and Ha...-porIna (In-
.Ianec\ for busl..... applications In ..hlch the pro- cludlnl 1'fM1rUJdlu.... H""""""'- and Hq>a....
gram has the appearance of plain Enlllsh. AI- qslta).'
though It 1.1_ efficient and more difficult to use .. ,........... poa- (kok..ld"e-o\'dal) - ...,.
than newer programmlnglanguag.., most busln_ cUlloldo..,......,..
programs .re .till written In COBOL. C\IJ . ....,.. (kok..ld"e-o\'dez) IN.L. aH:ddlum +
..- (ko'brah). term applied to several poisonous -o/J1ft, from Gr. IJi4M forml. genuo of pathogeniC
makes of the genus Nojo, family Elapid... that .re Imperfect fungi that ....... as · mycelium with ar-
ciapable of expanding their neck regions to form . th_pores In aoil and as. spherUle with endospores
hood. and that ha.e Immo.able holl_ f.ngs. N.- hi tlssue..TIte most Important of Its speci.. \a C
tI.e to Africa .nd A.la, cobras produce a venom ImmllU, the etiolCJll!c agent of coccId\oldonlyeaala.
ha.lng both neurotoxic and hemotoxlc properties; It a ......~~ . (kok-Iicl"..oI"do-m1-.....>
I. a potent anllcoqul.nt and eauses hyperslyeemla, 1 Cot:dtlloUln + Gr. m,Wlf........ + .....eondltlonl
coronary .....1 dilation. .nd eardl.c arrest Antl- a syste1blc myeaela, oec:urrilllln primarY and ...,.
.enlns are a.allable throulh polson control centers andary /onnS, th.t \a eauoed by the orpnlam eo.-
or zoo admlnlatrators. cUl/ollln.lmmllll; It _lIy results In a Du-llke 111-
" 'fto (ko'kln) 1...... + -1lU) \USPI. an .Ikalold. n_. About 100.000 Indl.lduall.re .ffected annu-
methylbenZOylecgonlne. obtained from lea... of the ally: lIO-95 percent of u.- In areas ..here coccIdl-
coca tree, E,.,t"_1on COCtJ. .nd other E,.,t"_ omyeaela \a endemic .re .k1...- paaldve. Many
Ion .pecl... Cocaine blocks nerve conduction In . eases .re uymptomati<:.
manner .Imll.r to that of other local ._belles; EPmI!MIQLOC\'. C l..m'lta \a · soli saprophyte
however. It .Iso blocks the reuptake of _Ineph- found In semiarid TOIions of the aouthwestam
rlne .t nerve termln.l.. produelnl .ympathoml- United States u _II as Mexico and Central and
metlc el/ectS Includlftl lni:reued eardlac rate. dl- South America. The fu...... ....... 3-4 In. bel_ the
Isted pupil.. .nd constricted blood .....1.. Its .__ .urface of the soli. and followlftl ralnf.1I -
constrlctl.e p.operlY mak.. It uoe/ul as . topleal closer to the .urf.ce. On dryl.... arth._......4 d.
anesthetic lor .urgery on the muCOUS membra..... seminate. .nd .usceptlble personI .equlre the d.
Cocaine Is also. central nervous .ystem .tlmul.nt .... from Inh.led spores or the infection of open
th.t produces euphoric excitement: .buoe .nd de- .kln 1..lons. Transmission In humans from · drain-
pendence constitute. major drul problem. Hydrol- Inl sinus has .Iso been den~_ted.
ysllo/ the drulln tbe gastrointestinal tract mak.. PA11\OGEI'l\CMECHA-The \nCUbatlon period \a
or.1 admlnl.tr.tlon of therapeutic doses Ineffective; 1-<4 ..It. Infection within the lungs may be JII*'"
It I.. h_ever. readlly.bsorbed throulh the muCOUS monic, Involve hllar nod... or both. Uaua\ly. the In-
membranes. fectlon I. se\f-lImltln.. althoUlh It b...<l..... d-.n-
.. lIy.....hlorl... \USPI. the salt form of cocaine. Inatee! to bone. .ubc:utaneCJU8 - and the me-
__ -:ra determination 0/ cocaine In ble>- nlnl" in 5 percent 01 th_ affected.
100lc .peclmens. After extraction lrom .mmonlaeal Clinically. coccIdioJdomyeoo\a \a a vartabl.
solution. cocaine eanbe quantitated by colorimetry, Du-lIkl!' IRn_. produclnl fever. CXIUIh. bone and
spectrophotometry, thln-I.yer chromatOlf8phy, or joint pain. ..ellht I-. chest paI.....nd sore th-'-
\I Id h h urI Some patients may develop erythema noc\aIIIIII and
gal' qu c romatograp y. For ne assays. both e-hema multiform.. 11teoe ---- manlr--
heterogeneous .nd homogeneous Immu_y .,. ""--
procedures are ..all.ble. The latter .re primarily tlons..re p....nostic slsns that the d\MUO haa.pnb-
dl ed rd L__ I I ajo ably ~ dtaeemlnatee!. The pul..-rY man!-
Itt":'" towa ...._y ecgon ne. . m r metabe>- feotatlons uiually dlaappeaT rapidlY (85 percent 01
the time). Chronic pulmonary d~ may be_
__ -",>Ute -7 ... under /wrazOrf<<ItJ- c1ated orltft .\IIIlfleant exert\ofta\ dyspnea. Jtemop-
Itiv. lysl.. at pleural e\fUlion.
.....1>0.,.- (ko"kahr-bok'.I.lis)'" """.,/torr- LAioRATOIIY OIACNOSIlI. C 'fIImllil....... within.
ItJIfti L under l""'mlv. .. _ ._ _.. _ c!~n enp.s!l!!!!..Sabo!Jraud'llI!!!II!!m ll..J!IOI" -
lrombin-
te cofse-
!IIel. and
11 retinal
t.
for .lta-
lt portion
ring. the
obalt, but
veI'Y-gr8Y.
element:
3d tran.l-
:h +5 (+2
in many
Cobalt(l\I)
J. There 11
IUcl.ll....
The dally
3 I'g.Inha-
.5 may pro-
. The aver.
"g/d\. Most
ex.cessive
cause poly-
nel'Ye dam-
IUeed radio-
ays by elee-
..t of which
n. used for
57.
ced radlonu-
lere- beta
~amma raYS.
reo In mega-
ic assay. Foi-
l or ashlng of
bstances. the
m..hvdroxlc.le
.'
.'
Search. is under way
for desert. sf>.il fungus
TRANSPORTATION/FLp.QD CONTROL
. . DEPARTM!n'r .
February 16 1993
~:J':I
Wi
. ...........
,\~r:.. .
..
COUNTY OF SAN IERNAROIN(
l'UIUC WOIIICI GROUP
121 Eal TlIIrd Sir.. . Son 8om.cllno. CA 92415.0838 . 17141387.Z8OCI
FIX No. 17141 387.2187
KEN 4. MILLER
Oitw....,
ATTACHMENT,-F_I
---------- ---
City of San Bernardino :
300 Noreh "on str..t :
San Bernardino, CA 92418
A-c-cent1on:
Deborah Wolclruff
File: 2-201/1.00
218.0110
RZl'ERENCE:
!
ZONE 2, CAJOJI' CItED WASH, GPA '91-1'
Dear H&. woldruft:
I
The San Bernardino County Flood Control D s-crict. is. (l ...........1:ha-c
the proposed calHat mi.ning activity coul cause erosion "._p to
existinq flood contz'Ol taciliti_ within ajon Wa.. '1'be Distd.ct
feels that SOIl8 ot the recen-c ftoft "'....-lJ W our 1_... w4<thiD tIae
wa.h wa. exacerbated by bead c:uttincJ om the ~ ~l"t
aininq pi -c northerly of Hiqh1aDCl Avenue. Bead c:uttincr 1s c:e\lAd.
when the slopes of the pit are eroded . .y until eczql1.1briua 1s
reached in the slope ot the ehanfte1.
I
The District would lilea the OPPOrtunity ...........ent ~ 011 tbe
proposed IIininq activity attar a revi.. f flood c.t-..vea, vith!Jl
the wash area, and their. causea bas been de. '1'be iDatrua .1 ~ f h9' .
activi-cy is where the District is _inly ccmc:erned. Bud ClUt:tini
could affect ))Otb the lnatitut!on Road Devora Road cro.siDcJa.
I
Should you bave any quest10ns or need additional iDfOXllation,
plea.. contact .e at (909) 387-2515.
I
1tENNETH GOIDRY, Chi. I
Water Re urces DiVisio~
I
I
XOG/CAUIo\r
cc: Xen A. Killer
Willi_ K. Collin.:
,
Douqlaa II. Spraque:
I
_ . ;;~,3~~:~;:~~~~~ HE2TH S~RVICES~~:
~. ,~ . -:~
: ~\\\"I'lf~
~t~
-.... --
-:;.. ..:=:-
~ ~....
/1Plli\\~h
~~O~N~~Uti ~NARDIN(
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEM&NT GROUP
~r...~;"...e-...."":~'..,",~i~::-1..:)~J-r.t.x..~'.,"'",._.;,- " ,..~-;4.rh-"~ \,,1 .,..~ '. ,,:,,;r.,: LJ'~"".
_\i:":.~r-"'..?h\~ :{i""..-.....;..~...:V:..r(.\\~..\t,:::A
-. 3 385 Nollll Ano.....ad A._ . St........... CA '2415.01'0 . 17141387-464'
CJ 320 Eon "0" S...., . 0._. CA .1764 . 17141391-7170
o 15505 CIvi. Oriv. . ViOl""'. CA '2312 . lel'l 243-8141
C 17830 Arrow Boul...rd . F..._ CA 82335 . 17141 121-52&4
o 57407 r....,y_ P.....IfitIl...-, . v_ V.Io,. CA 92264 . 11191221-5410
C1 San ..".ltdina CounlY Vector Control' p'.......
2355 E.II Filth Str..t . S..lomonIltIo. CA '2415.00t4 . 17141383.3200
CI En.~.........1 Enf......... ..d HouslIlg
172 W." Third $,_ . S.._..rmo. CA 92411.0315 . 17141 387-UI21t515
PAMEl.l.A BENNETT. II. E. H. S.
Director
February 16, 1993
AIIO ..''lint tftt .~itI .,:
AIII"Ift_ Moll",..
....... van.,. N.....
........ On&aorit
lit ..... CoIU .....tf'IO ewe.....
CNAe ".eft......
c._ RtM.
iIIontM, .... ..."........
Grana T....... TwentYfW'lt '.....
H"",.. Uttfftil
Mi....'AftClI VtctoMllt
&.Ima Umt. 't lICIiN
-san Bernardino City Hall
Attn: Planninq oepartment
300 North D Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Subject: specific Plan 90-01, GPA 91-18
CUP 91-31, PM 14106-108
The Department has concerns
the closed Cajon landfill.
regarding the Cajon landfill
(LFG) and odors.
Normally, siqnificant landfill qas migration can extend !leyond
1000 feet to at least 2000 feet or more if the soil is permeable.
of developent of lud .surroUndinc;
The primary environmental concerns
are off-site landfill gas migration
So the Department of EnvironJllental Health servio.. recOIIIlIIends at
a mlnilllum that a landfill qaa testinc; and monUoring at. the
perimeter of proposed developments and a LFG monitoring and
warninq system installed in each st.ructure within one-fourth mile
of the cajon landfill perimeter.
If any questions or follow-up, please contact. our Local
Environmental Aqenpy (LEA)fWaste Management section at. 387-4655.
_~ r/?jze-
SCOTT ROSE, REHS
Environmental Health specialist III
SR:bp
cc: Jim Trujillo, LEA Supervisor
PoeI-It- brand fix lrII1M1m.J memo?871 '111,.....
.'
o . 0
SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS@
..;, r ~'- ~o W
cc 4,
v"~"'<i!...
. .
.
L.~::
REALTOR'
'798 NORTH D STREET. SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92405
P.O. BOX 2183 . SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92406
(909) 886-5031
Mr, Al Boughy
Director of Planning
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
r--, .. .-,
I D) , -
, - -
; rl1
U:.: FEB ~
J
;--0"
'J : ~!
i i: I
'''' .
':S3 L--J
:':"_::s.: "'.
,
. .
..........1
-
~-, ,',
L..._... .
. ,'~.;
Dear AI:
The San Bernardino Valley Association of REALTORS has been
briefed twice on the Cajon Creek project proposed by CALMAT; once
ae our General Membership Meeting on January 18,1993 and next at
the Local Government Relations Committee on January 29,1993.
We are in support of the CALMAT project because of the jobs
it will create if they are allowed to proceed. Many of us are
very familiar with the manner in which CALMAT developed their
Mission Valley holdings in San Diego and, if they do a similar
project, we think San Bernardino will reap the benefits for years
to come.
We would encourage the Planning Commission approve the
Cajon Creek Project as presented by CALMAT.
sincer63
,~~ .1:;:-~~
~~is Cantrell
President
~
.-
18DClFFICEM: LEWISCANTllEU."'..d..I.RITANORTON.IIlw.r. .. ..1UE.....,_.2nII~... .. "'WWlMLLSI,
s.cn.ty . RAY TALBOTT, T_
DIIlICTOlII; DENNIS DAVIS 'ALlCE DOOD.loWlY EASTERDAY. DALE D'TVANDEIl' AClN KElIfER.SftVI Lnr 11-JN.IMVlD
SCHULZE. ROBIN SHIDLER. AND JIM TMU,.,U. ~-
EXECUTIVE ClFFICEIl: SAM G. HENLEY
.
(j
o
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT; ~
OFi=lCIAL N,OTICE OF ,PUBLIC H~RING .BEFORE THE CITY
..OF..SAN. BERNARDINO-PLANNING..,COMMt~~19N:_ .. ._
..- ~-_._ ...... _.--..___._. ____.._4____.._.__.__
. .::~:~i~~:,~:~~~::~::::.~~:::~:=:;.;:;:.::"i:;~;~'::;:~':;~~::::::;~;'=~'io,~::';.~~~:~~~~~-~:~~
;":,.~ii !;~tU~CDaNo:-nw:' ~EVELO ~'5'D~' IM_0-::-9~":AJ ..,. ~\Yj, -
", ; ,..,... ~ .,~ ," ~."'.l:.-ONDti~o..;;!.;:!'!';.,;s,.;:.-;T:;;=~~. ..,~~~.r-.t.;;~i!T.{;~~ ;:: -:'\'-~''':fN
.....; ~~:'7:.7I : ~.:....'.~......:::~. ~~~ ~~~~~~~ .' ~_ .. ~ ... ._.
..;....,.. ,P~=-_.-" .ANDA'ENTAT~Al3r.~~S. 'JJ;06'-U-1-O:Z::.~~04-1,08_ _~~_~. ~'-
'~"_:.=: ;;"_::':=-~":"..__.U__ -.. .'w ...__
-
';:;;.~ . .----....,.. ---...
. . ~ROPERTY LOCATION:. \ ...:
, . -"~ - ." .. " ".~ . -,~:
--
-.-0:-...---:-......-...
-
;. ..:;
- .... .....-
. . . - .
-. . 7J" - " _ ro'~ .
. ~. ....- ..".
. ...1.;.',
.,. ~;. ~""
. .
.---- ~ ::"-:Th.-Project--iii:t.~i.:""'icX:ated~~~sid.':';;" c.j~.
Boulevard. qenera1.1y .betweeil Devore Boad and' the uniDcorpora1:ed . '. .
COIIIIIIUJ1ity of Muscoy (partially) 'in the COunt:y' of San Bernar4iho and . - -: .-:
the City of San Bernardino;:' .-.. ....--....0 .. .'.... -.. -'-"-'---'- :.-
----~. 'liKi41UtdP~ -1251----:::0...
PROPOSAl:
A proposal to _tablUh land use diIltricta, permitted uses,
development standards and guidelines in order to utilize 1,392
acres of land for llineral extrac1:J:.,., heavy iDdustrial, liqht
industrial, open space UII.. with Bini"!J related in1:erba 118... !be
project is phased with ultiluate builclout at 25 years.
PUBUC HEARING LOCAnON:
SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL
COUNCa. CHAMBERS
300 NOFmf "D" STREET
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418
r HFAR...tn I"Tl= ANn nUl:.
- \... Tuesday, February 16, 1993
.)
" - - T
7: 00 J .
OF $IoN .......RDlNO
CITY _.-aT OF "",IIlNING .
l)EPA~.HG sEJMCES
~~ IoJ~.
"'V
A__...._II_.._~......._
- L .QrHIL............... ..._~ _..
--..--..........-.-- "-
..,~~. ~_. . .....
Dear Friend: ~
J . . . tha tectiDg our environment is one of ~;f
County Supervisor Jon Mikels believes ~Jro. the 1990's . and he's absolutely ~
most critical challenges facing our communI es In... i "'
right. .' ____.._____ ~
_._~. "
------ .... ...........- u/~ - dA 7:te... . t::C ~
.... .._....~...-.._- ~ .:z.c;.G 4..0
.,..-....__........... "-"'- ~ c.-.4.-t../ ~ ~"
.................-....,...--................ 0&- ~~ - /'. vt..-7" zt..,
........-.--- u. n.~fILA....... /):...;
...-....--... A_ /.:;~.;> v'.7i1t:o""u
. ~.u... - ----- ...... - C:;-~ - ~ ..,.
..- ,,--.J,.
__7
"'(111",_
---
e~_!:.t'~ c;;,~_ ~_'ClF' t_
"
o
,Qruary 1 4, 1993
, Cooper Q. Hart
, Violet R. Hart
,18168 Hillcrest Dr.
'Devore, CA.92407
.Telephone Number
'(909) 887 5270
::
Subject:
CalMat Cajon Creek Project.
Specific Plan No.90-01 General Plan ,Amendment
No. 91-18 Developement Code Amendment No. 92-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31/Reclamation Plan,
And Tentative Parcel Map nos. 14106',' 14107, & 14108
In opposition of this "TOTAL PROJECT" We submit the following:
, A good look at defacement of land'having been used for
mineral extraction (Quarries) in Redlands and'the Campus at
Highland Ave. Upland Area Projects should t~ll the planning
Commission this is not in the best interest bf San Bernardino
City or County for future use of surround~ng'area or the
residents of the surrounding area.
The Campus Project is haphazardly fenced with steep deep cliffs.
Easy access for children or anyone into very dangerous grounds
and poorly posted. Dangerous ugly scarsto that community.
Were they promised reclamation of the land.??? What happened.???
This CalMat proposed project was first to be approximately 20 to
30 feet deep and now it is projected to be 125 feet deep.
I would say the millions needed for reclamation be put in trust?
up front as ploys of bankruptcy and other factors are cause for-~
protection in todays times.
Provisions should be put in place for the HEALTH HAZARDS this
will create such as the spores in our local soil that can disable
for LIFE. This is "coccidiodomycosis" also known as San Joachi.
Valley, fever, Valley fever and Desert rheumatism.
The secondary form (or progressive c.) is a virulent and severe
chronic, progressive, granulomatous disease ~sulting in involve-
ment of the cutaneous'and subcutaneous tissues, viscera, central
nervous system, and lungs, with anemia, phlebitis, and various
allergic responses. This form may be caused, by a new infection or
by reactivation of arrested primary disease~
Medical Information Attatched. Also be informed at this time L.A.
and Kern Counties have this in epidemic pro~~~ionsand spreading
with warnings given on television. Advise you check thier HEALTH
DEPARTMENTS. This spore is airborne in dust created' in our severe
winds which in its self effects asmatics.(I am one of many in our
area.) Traffic is also a danger with both light and heavy indust-
rial trucks.. spreading this fungus spore to us and passers through
WARNING February 14, 1993 Channel 4 5:30 to ~:45 PM Bakersfield
4000 cases in last 18 months, One half of residents have tested
positive. The medication cost $700.00 per prescription ( One
Months Supply ) Recovery is slow with lifetime damage in severe
cases. Who takes responsibility and liability.in this matter the
City, County Or CalMat? Also attatched contamfnation gasoline
alone 1 gallon can contaminate 760.000 gallons ground water as
well as other oils fuels etc. Note: This proj~ts location over
San Bernardi~o's WATER BASIN. Again we ask WHO"S Liability.???
We understand that thousands of gallons of water will be used
daily in washing process to leach chemicals, gas, oil and other
contaminations into ground water. This is not.. HEALTHY THOUGHT
is it?
J!' I . I J j _ IJ _,." _ _
,. Paae 1 of , A 1...... "f'+,,+,.h..r1 '1 ..l.......
o
Fe~~ry 14, 1993
. .
Letter of opposition continued:
Traffic Congestion:
We have been informed heavy truck tr~!fic to start will
increase with time on-to already planned he~vy traffic introdu-
ced through Glen Helen Park Functions and t~e now being
constructed Amphitheater of which they are nQw projecting even
the stacking of traffic on Old Cajon Road.
Our ingress, egress and small businesses will be negatively
effected
If the beauty of the area is destroyed it will effect the Glen
Helen Park negatively as well as one of the beautiful areas left
We feel it would surely be in poor judgement for an Environmental
Impact Report study to approve this project.
We ate home owners of Twenty Three Years in Devore and very
concerned in this matter.
Respectfully
~'I
Cooper Q.
d,
.'
.
Page 2 of 2 Also.attatched 3 pieces.
. ,
. .
"
- ~'ljIF!~nJ!l,i il J fl=Fi1V' iEiftl;:J:HHl1i,Uft: tU~::H,~JHHnflnfHfl!:.:i
...i=p rJ.$'~i " .-1 at · t-It "Ut-,ll~ Hi., ~f ;r ~"IS"J Ilr"I""" II "-!&Ioc
fjrF:i~~~i.:1 if ':.}.1_ j'iffi (Horiii'lr'''h-u,~ i[,'i'i. ~ - r~~(FPilf!J'=
;. (prjrii.n II~ ,d~, llltl -J [h.~ri"ri~f!' hi. 1 i ;~Ji'.II.i "l~~ hh'~;::r"!.it2.
' ' !. I t - "," -, ., I . :r or ~ i'!:!" "Q:i 1 il:ri r -,~ r" _
i:1J .fJfdillH 'is,:, {'I h. !1.il.J.fd~lJflfHi ftJ, fif~ilt~HUU!;;~~UifHl
i ii~"!f' !:I~l .. 12,' r H Rf 11' liiJ;fi "i ~~~r ",,,,;''''''"" !ab,;'f;r"i'
l r,I:IJ.iH~ "(if ~11 ,it :t.f./.frliih.ffj : I :1,'i!:ttn~!inJ!:;::"il'fl
. ~':rf~l!r;; " f~j --If rf ~J"ltiil,.I'II~"i~ i i ;~ iiiaurl:;." ~IIJlh~F.;
: i thr II &'[f 0, f ~' B . It-Hll'[l~~I~, f. i ih~;'Ii.J~Et;(f. flij~1 i
~ \\\\\\\~\ \\\ n\ \\\ t' :.Htiiimmn! f J mil/!I/JJm ~111J! f i
-. ,.
fril{!!{fftllfJljll!liUP.lfffJ " f;I..~! " tIHntml~\1nii~\'
~, ,s.. , ' s"1 f.. 'I ' I " 'f " l I. I. f
JI!!I'e,glsJ ll=fuilf~l j rf.1i' l~ Ii 't-i'! itl [1"-',
iUI. ,h~h H~lhJld U~t,:'t d H !!~ ~ iff f.fJ
. !
lffm~~tmllJlfilin:!I!I!1I J ~III! I~Ui!J(lt~JlIIUJf IHlil:ut
]Ilti!~ ~ll [f-UJffl-_'" Ii f..'it (_fiff fi(( -( I ;'U-f I:H
HH!h~ "~l f I HHfj~ !i'fI r ! f,"!J'" if ~R.~'" fl.) fLJ(; ~ I h i
iiJ!I~ JI~ * i~Ulll !II! f ! =fln fl~ ;1J I. ;~'. tf:Hf! I J~r J
Hfll!!i 1~11 hI flf!,'~J ~hi I : [" 1 III Ii Ill!.!. i
r r'fl; ~~ ~f !r~h~ !ti' I f ~ i JlfR. b ! J;I: r · :
U~lt I"JrJ I:fl [t1~1 III i I! f I fa J :.lr I. R
. u ~;.. >[L;rfl" I if i. Ii". I, ~". · 111. f .1 I, '~~f.IJ! .H~I_
dl'tf.iI"'~ . ifl I., I r a-[ t-t '. -It" ii!!5- 'IIi i: ..~_5I.. . 'r-"f;LI [I'll
!llli!l!itlll!\l!I'lljll',:!lli!(I!I!I!!il!t,ii!l_il[lIlli:I'jIt!lrir~li;i!ljli!ll!!il!II:,!iltJ!l!ii!'J;iiliil!
;In,,11..lpDllll-h,i. f~l;: =I"i"~ If i' 'Ii pII.J;" JI'JJl.t!1' .'[[['1 rl t !}I IIH!H
H!~Hh~iJ..h~~l~H~I~I;lt uhk ~JtHliri: lu=hht. h r nJUrhd rt...f. n atnm
. .'
~;I i ~lnfHtl~I-t! 1~I"IiP lfii!i.tlniiIJHitKI~~I~IJlf"llifllf[ln!I.JJ'lrll.fJtlilttUJl;tliJtf.lIJJjftl>llJ.
i-I nIp ilU 51 t(h ",Ju-_.~ ~,. '.tHl.rJt, . . 11. r ..In 'J.fr f I If. 11
tUtti' E1r1l-i [~in r i'Llf~ III 'Iur'" n t Jf f~~kJ .'1' lllr) 'nIl r,r II
~r'J~\tt~t~l ~r'lll.flt!ll ,.~ii.J .i!f.J~.JJrl_~lfftf l:r fJ'l.ff,1 !Jf,r If , J.lf, r~,!l,1
. . .
"
II!ill!.'ltif~il(..!'lrll!..if.~It[J::Jfif~I'tlr![Jli[fflftiiJrIJlr!I'lllIJlf~f,I;~~!III~lllJl:tlll.l~I~111
:Ifthf!. . S'P Illltf... ~ , ! I fl tf t Hi fl. I~ .., r I. .tI 'I. fr <II "=a
ii!li!ftri~~Jt'!!lliil!~'-;!f!I~!lllf"I 1,I!Jllf!IIJllf~Jffli~rlil~Jltlll!l! i liiill!,I,!!lll !1!'ft
I. J ..lit JI! ..HI I ..sa ..'Ir. [ 1.. h f! if'llil. lot r . r rt!"
,UJ" I .HlId :UI llll. ~,'!lllll!! M:,!mr(ll !llIlIIldlm,. , .,I!IU~ r!III!!!!'"
I H~!liH~!"nHIHHhhihmfr:li~i~nJbJ'IH HH!.~~!liji:tlY:t~;hIH ~"f,i!Jilh!
o
o
::
'.
,
,"
- Few 100 daya __ year, you CUI'l
eYeD _ __ Ibe veaerable GUIld
eaDyoa becaDIC Ibe .u above it illO
poIIlIled.
-WbeJai't_tow_
TCIJODto JIIIatoInpby IlVllH&
Lyacb Iriea to DIMe Ibe !lPtaf
He baa "_fuIIy _tloped
P'ap/Iic film Ia Ibe ... '.
tenolLabo.u.na......... ... .
aad Love CaaaL (S~ 'You
Ihno,Icta'lbe.Afteral,. "'01.
IpilIecI paoIIae CDD ~a~. lip Iqj
75O,OOO~oI~~).. '"
-...,.
'.
.'
. .
, .
. . ()
, ~~ tu~t.-.D~FF
tJ-~(!,;fArv N~
~T'/ ();::'-~~~iJ
o
~/@k~r #~ It; /f~ ~
;]I :::: -:' "-~ hi 17170 )ltt..~AU-;:J
i .~ . i i\ I. J
! ~ ; ,. ,_,. ~ L! 1 V;
..' FE3 I 0 ,'~3 '.:;J ~i<Jl/ CA-- f..:z.'fOf
~ . v ,',_ . "",~O
/)'u/ ,/J '.::::.;,,,.',. .".
~ IC-(;v ", ",.-"w.. -
d-~~~ ~i~~ ~~
i-tk ~ ~~ ~tI71,</T -~
f' 1f)~, ~.c ~t ~J
tJ./~7~~-/rJ~ -".v-7' ,'--
6-( {]#Ind:' - rA.o ,-PA ~;tp ,.Le-~/<<..~y. · r,:
_.~ ~ , t .e. C..,\. A~ ~' ~<.#
.~ 1'~ 1~~~lJ .,</..:.,"1 ~--"- tJ,. l'-o
~ ~~/'-7>u-"7 Of':..a,..'..u ~d..I
~ ~/ ~ ~d.'(~"'-~ ..., - Jt;i,,~
. 4~';zL;~-h~
~ ~ ~ o~..,liL"J'~lH':;'~_;'~ t7
, (p..,.R. -1t) .u.9 ~ ~ ~ A...-d -,,",,?/,AL~:I- ~1f" lCi:
r :=zz/
1 zt..;, ~ ,e,,-,. ~ .:& cnl, _e<~""-.'-'#_~'
.5c4 ~ H zt.- 7n'- ~ ~;l..~~,~,/
t' ~ -- '
, ~a-</~ ~~ .vp.w;O.~;; ",;',b-w ~
! ~ ~.- 09...-.v ~~..."..~.J -e,'.Jt... ~~
I LIvt:3 - tf<~I~~#d ~ - ~~t.4U ~ fi.~~~..J
i ~(.<LIC.J hJ~~ ~ ~/?,#~ ~~~',...--:r
I p~,~~-- ._'~ ~~~~;(f -Ik. :; ~ II ~ ~ (;1"...t ~~_D'O(.#-
i d.u.d--,;;t;i..c.-~ H' ~(.,.~,~-~ -' / e, A _4t.J1Ilt-::t&.-
I ~~ ~,;J ~ ok ,*".r-~ ~ ~#--
:i ~ ~ ~ ~ k ~"4(~ AT ~"lU
1 ~;t;.~~ ~ ~f' ~_~I1.'''~'- ,_...p
,I <-,J~ ..I..__~ -./....~ ~~ ../. .L.r -
-.(1.-.c .~~~ - ~
- -- -- ., -~ ~
.....
o
o
~
81R
::
J -:.
. ". ;~_-.. =- II
":.;, .'4
February 11, 1993
.. ,.. -, W
0) -"', ;~ "~.' \~ 1-, \!)
\ " \ " '~"3
\jl., rEB ~ \,l .;:-,
Ms. Deborah Woldruff
Associate Planner
Department of Planninq
and Buildinq Services
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA
92418
re: calKat cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01
4....1~~C
_ .' ~.;"NAhlol'
." .-'1 :--; ,,;_~.I. '-.... .11."-~ NG &.
~~~ ~..~~ ~: ':;:~"~;;~"i;.:~'~S
Dear Ms. Woldruff:
I have had the opportunity to review the above mentioned proj.ct
and will r.commend to the BlA Board of Dir.ctor. to give it. full
support for this project for the following r.ason.:
1. Jobs
This project will qenerat. 11,000 new job..
At a time when forecasts continu. to indicat. that in
1993, there will b. continued jOb 10.... and .low income
growth -- not the b.st scenario for p.opl. to ..11 a
house -- we need to do all we can to promote and provide'
job. for our city and county. (.ee attached January 7,
1993 Inland Valley Daily Bulletin article).
2 . Open Space
488 acre. will be left untouched. A contiguous
257 acre. will be reveqetated with native
plantings upon completion of shallow mining.
This will form a permanent 745 acre open .pace
wildlife corridor along cajon Creek. Thi. make.
up for over half of the entire proj.ct acreag..
3. Revenues to the City of San Bernardino
Sales and property taxes from this project, a. well a.
from the projected industrial development, will be a
source of significant new revenue..
9227 Hoven Avenue, Suite 280 . AonchoCucomongo,CoUfomIo 91730 . (714)945-1884 . FAX(714)948-9631
-
.
-
o
o
Ms. Deborah Woldruff
February 11, 1993
Page 2
4. CalMat is and will continue to be a responsible Corporate
citizen
The requirements of the specific Plan insure that the area's much
needed industrial growth will take place according to a well
conceived and environmentally sensitive plan. The specitic
planning area regulations insure high standards ot quality and
control as well as making it possible for everyone to know, well in
advance, what types of development are envisioned for the future.
CalMat has taken extraordinary steps to design their project to
conserve the natural wildlite habitat corridor while provicUng jobs
and building material to help meet the economic goals and objective
ot our region.
Sincerely,
~"""- ';( U/dk-
Frank L. Williams
Governmental Affairs Director
Valley Region
cc: Mr. William B. Bethel
BIA/BV Executive Officer
I
.-
o
, . ~ /7Y~...Y:
() ~...d., - .
. --\Qr'2:!:7 - / .- -' -~ ~ ~
zt-d~~~"~"
~~a/Y4"~~
.--/~~~
tZ--nAJ . - C2.o J ~ -4<..e ~ ~V
,~~ c>><z-~~ '~~.z;,"e'
c.-.6 ~ . . .-
'~Z::' .-
. a ~~ -. ~::~~ ~ ""~-._'-""" .~.__.-.
E:;: ~ -~<</- '~"~~l'~,' ,
i':" ~ L...+..;~;-~Y"~;-~e~-;'-~~ ?~
: _ ;~ ~ ~ ~ .'''. ......e- =-d
,. .
'., ~ :.'-.:':'~_, ~ ~0--~- -'..1~~.A'<;"
',": I::: -
- :~~:~ ~~~~ .----.--
--~ ~c--:::F'~ ~ ~ ~-.~('- .'7- - .. ---
:;L ::::X::;::~ :;:~~;:~-_<_.-~=
oLo~,..,...D"'/~~~
!;.../ /;<-~ A....
--cs><.-e< alo~r<-y'.;..~ '..
.~.~~.~.......
-!;-;;;~ a~d ~~.<t.he<,~ ~_
~ r~~~:,;.. '
~ ~.~ --~..
~.~,n~~~~~n-. .
-;~~~.~~~~---'--: '.
~ 'd-~__.. .
'/""_0' A/ ~./-~~. fi./ ..1-~~,",
~;
~ 19&
'/
::
~.
_..... ;}--
~:a(
,
.
.81 J?~G~ocJ.sL.Y U~DC-;.trYIf/.E -,;h2a;' ty11111JL..(A./~ R;r'LIW~~'-
~~ I=e'} V~ho1<l PAC1FII':J A-7\.~ .sOc/71.Si!/t..N tJA-C.u:.,c. Dti4cic:s
LU~ Awrne.At<:.. "'fi"'._,4o.JS lhVo n+oU:SA-Nl:i-S lJF i'D1V.5 DC
A2.ezSUT- ~G Ot.J TP-A-CK.. C..c""'.'STJ'.~..,.../7tV DA>{ A-.Vb IVI6/-1-?-.
... t!Je..E1::Fn~ Tf2.A..F PiC?.. I*Z~DS Fo~ S~ BII.5e3 ;=hc.ti) t;:M-
- -
GJe..~..N" 87-1-1 r:..u::~ 0 AI CA-JO,V 8 W;') A""I.Jl;1.J en o~.s 01=
~,*78 I::r ;h<.,)) Ji../5') Ihv..) trr t:..A-ft...l2&To abssu..)G-S
.. ~ IY'/4r ';<-'/,(,<5'1 iv'OT 8;;;- A-,u...ouJ€'D TV D~/~Y 'n/C Goo/:)
77-+-, "'-/&..5 1hu..D ~E'" /fAc,Ir:) c" j.!/7'J4 0 v/l- If.!. 4L-ru , H;, ~~
,4,.vn 1.fA.I'IJ I "'-/t5S.$ , At! I'Ht. G- e- L.E7vitS
WE Att.G ',A-eE 7J4I..,<.,A1<>- I4-doc)r . ..-"_ t q 17" /wID -kEwbML. ()A.
'IJ/!!.{)~L€!"..,,' L-Jt/e..!5.. rrr:- L tl~^_....~r:-,.~ O",L.....
/.
o
CalMaI Co
o
c",::
CJc.lMat
P.O. BOX 2110. LOS ANGIUS. CAUFOllN'AllllIIil 12131Szm
3ZlIl SAN FERNANOO ROAD. LOS ANGELES. ~ALlFOllNIA ...
December 7, 1992
Ms. Deborah Woldruff
Associate Planner
City of San Bernardino
. 300 N. "D" Strllet, 3rd Floor
San Bernardino. CA 92418
Dear Deborah:
Subject:
Addition of new conditions CaIM.al SP 90-01
We have been meeting with members of the community in Devore, VenIemont,
Cimarron Ranch and Muscoy. These meetings have been very informaIive for us. We
have a much better understandina of local issues and concerns which wiD help us
design a better, more sensitive project. -nHt:Y J:fAI(J pi WE' AhT ~,...,/l..tS.,.... If(
Our Company is committed to findin& solutions to community concerns. It is -..-
of this commitment thar. we are recomme:ndina the addition of five new conditions to
SP 90-01. These conditions address thO followina important issues.
Devore Sridp:
TraU:
Grove or Trees:
CaIM.al rock trucks wiD not use the Devcn Bridp until a
safe alternative equestrian crossing is found for I 215
from the Devore area. 7'1hS-1lM:S ,"Uf''l' ~~ ~A-Y
;PVJl!" all ill- A..tHttJ Si" t111J'ft.
CalMat wiD provide a nortbIsouth trail-- thJou&b
the open SplICe area of our project. Its 1_...... wiD be
determined in coordination with a community trails
committee, the City of San Bernardino and the County
rqional trails system.' ~_ _ ~.Dtqt.8 ~
I~- I
There is a arove of trees located in the ~on Cleek area
nonh of Institution Road that is important to lona time
Cajon Creek residents. CaIM.al wiD leave a portion of the
grove to serve as a buffer zone for the upstream IIIiDin&
operation. ).0 A'~ ~ ,,~ 1-~"'r;;S <<.Ht:.<
f5ft1PF~ T14tJr te4dJS ~ ~ o#~~
.-
o
o
Deborah Woldruff/CalMat SP 9().()1
December 7, 1992
Page 2
.'
Ground water:
CalMat wiu install monitoring wells to insure ground
water is not affected by project extraction. ,th/p I ~ 1 y IS
7'Jtt.e7U w,4.4 T ??
Dust: CalMat wiU collect data from its on-site wind
monitoring station. 'Ibcsc data will be used to create a
High Wind Response Plan customized to tit the WE1> ,FH., t.t I4r
Santa Ar.a Wind Conditions at Cajon Creek.
rD /'ft4-cIr:; A- ffl~P AJ/#b ~ p&.,a.,v 7rI ~
There are of course ocher community concerns and issues that are best addressed in an 1=tUJ,.-t
informal manner. To insure an open line of communication wich residents in the lIRa, Bu:-JI u6-
we arc developing scvcrallong term community outreach programs. 'Ibcsc progwns *lit!,., I!d ~
will include the following: IJPF.'
HotUae Number: People will be able to reach us directly if they have
questions or there arc problems with our operations. ""'"" ~
. -hd t..AT'rr "T'UeV- ~...-. <ff
Community Oversipt Committee: WI"-- 11/ ~_ ~ y 6r .J>d"vdr
A committee with I . c _ .sentation from Devore,
Vcrdcmont, Cimarron Ranch and Muscoy wiU be fo.lboid
to work with CalMat. ::J: ~"'r T'JII.ii;y ,I'~r2# T7i"f1'-
. ~M.4T'" SlhJv~ S. /I)t1U!.IUG- IAIrrJI. "'S -
Trails Committee: CalMat will facilitale the formadon of a IraiIs committee. ~T
This committee will be fonned to work with CalMat to V/~-
assist in clctcrmining the ltqa/Jll of the trail easement ~
through our propcny. This committee wiU also work to
find a safe equestrian trail crossin, for I 215.
Ih 4J ~.,.. ~ ,,~ .s~e,- s"..s6'$ t:'# I/No&. ~
Olhcr programs ",Hr.-developed aineelled. In the meantime, I look forward to AAoS'/~
diSCussing the addition of lhesc five c:oncIitions to our specific plan with you. "f'"JIO ~
Sincerely,
Douglas W. Sprague
..
CC: AI Boughey, Director of Planning
Valerie Ross, Acting Principle Planner
Mayor W.R. Holcomb
San Bernardino City Counci1mcmbcrs
San Bernardino Plannin, Commissioners
/J4nrr:?
!Jec.,J./ -
( 'i'iA
o
o
Enclosed for your information is a copy of the letter sent to Deborah Woldruff, Associate
Planner, City of San Bernardir.o. C:":Mat is committed to being a good neighbor. We are
pleased our community meeti1gs h~,ve identified these issues and we have been able to add
these conditions to the CalMat S?eC:r:c Plan 90-01.
If you would like to discuss :hese issues or any other aspect of the Cajon Creek project, please
call me.
rely;
I w,~1 Q'Vv\
W. Sprague ,
Reclamation and Speci Projects
~ .4f.:::t....ua A.d
~.J ~~
~ll-~~I~J
~~. - '6'1 ~',..:
Enclosure: D. Woldruff letter, 12nt92
,
o
0
- ; ". , ,
r.', :-, fl
. ~.: J " '.' ~ I,
\.:. l..:./
" I FE3 1 b '~':'3
LLi I.. ...
February 9. 1993
CitY of SlIn Bernardino
Planning and Building Services Depanment
CItY Hall
300 North D St.
San Bernardino. CA 92408
i,,,l
.~; :.:0
,... ., . ~. .' .
.~; .. .'.' \":; Cto
,,-.--,
RE:
SDecific Plan No. 90-01. General Plan Amendment No. 91-18. Dav.loomB"! Coda AlTNlndment
No. 92'()6. Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31/Reelamation Plan. and Tenta!iVA Pareel Man Nos.
14106.14107. and 14108
The above proposed amendments requested by CaIMat for the purpose of operating a mining flcility
in the unincorporated arel nelr Muscoy/Devore should be denied.
Recently. in I mailing from CIIMlt Idvocates. it is implied that this IPplication is a "done deal". "We
loolc forward to d.aling with vou in thla project." Sound. pretty final daan't it? Thia particular _
ha. .uccellfully fought annexltion by the city for dtIcadIa. I. thi. Ib.t.wf the Iatnt atbomPt by the
City of San Bernardino to IttIln revengl Igainat the lrea Iocell? One would have to wonder.
If th.re is any questicllnNhy the residents 10 strongly OPJlOll IpprovII of c.lMat's r&qUllt, Iet'.
exsmine the section of road Immediately lbove the reilroad c:rouing at C8jon end UnlVll'lity 6btnltl.
It isltr1poulln to arrive at the street lightJinterHCtion of Hallmark Ind University lepproldmately 1/4
mile) without firat lvoiding at Inst two dozen enormous potholes. I mUet 1* you to renwnber - who
pays for the mlintenance of these streets? The Ins_r is not c.'Mat or their truck drivers.
Which City Pllnner is responsible for the brIUlant plan deaigned to rn&1IICII the trIffIc incruM cnaWd
due to construction permits grented to the developeq who bunt the homes IlIIr CaI State UnlVWIlty?
Or WIS traffic even conaidered when the requeat by the developerls) WII approwd? SInce It ~
It IIISt ~nty (20) to thiny (30) minUteS to IttIIn Iccess to 'ntIrItItI 215 betwwn 7:()()'7:30 I,m.
I would I..ume no one did. WIS Inythlng in the intersat of the public c:onsiderId? It Ia my ItrCIIlg
opinion that _. IS I citY. dell with the problems _ currently Ire fIc:Ing before _ CI'IItI new
problems for III our citY residents to deal with.
While CalMlt officll's PromiH "their truc:Ica will un Pllm Avenue 1IlCI1m..../lolw 15" to IeUS. the
pllnt "unl... mllclng a dllivery", what Ibout the other truclcs doing busineaa with CalMat? Wouldn't
thlt be the biggest population of vehicln IIltIring Ind exiting the facility? Couldn't IIIllldno truc:Ica
techniCll1y be classified .. "rnalclng daliVlriu"? I mean what e1H would _ do with a /oed of gravel
besid.. 'deliver" it?
The aforementioned letter 1'10 boasts of their drivers outstanding driving -U. Of CCIUrII they hive
excellent driving records' On my drive to work in Rlalto every morning, I have _ dozellS of
motorists thruat Into terrifying dlnger by the trucks entering Ind exiting the Highland fIc:IIIty. If you
were trlveling at I rete of 55 miles per hour Ind you HW I big rig truck enter the 6b.b.h of roecI
directly in front of you what would you donI! You hive to stop. If you couldn't stop in time to IVOid
the truck, Iccording to Californil HighwlY law, who would be haId ruponsible for this accident? You
gueued it. the innocent driver of the car.
Exhlust fumes from Iny vehicle know no streit boundaries. Everyone mUet endure exposure of
dangerous pollutants emitted from not only c.lMat vehicles but from the dUet Irlsing from the fIc:IIIty
AND equipment loelted at them. On any belutiful morning, .. I drive to work, I cannot help but be
slddened Ind outrlged by the huge, grotuque blot Ippearing In the sky which is apewlng from the
pipes of mlChinery loeated It c.lMlt's Highland flcillty. ACllinat the c:rvatIIIized blue of our IIrIy
morning sky. I conat8m atresm of smoke rises from the c.lMat lot, Ind Iinuer- for In atemity.
It
o
o
When windy skies emerge (which is perhaps 50% of the time), the same smoke blows across our clear
blue skies with It's comPllnion. the s.nd and din particles from the numerous piles of eanh who also
make their home at CaIMat.
I request information be presented at the meeting on February 16th. What percentage of the
population (WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE APPROVAL OF CALMAT'S
REQUEST) is in favor of approving CalMat's proposal and what percentage is opposed?
The unmitigated gaul of CalMat even proposing this amendment is symbolic of the absolute
indifference toward the people who live in areas surrounding such facilities, not to mention thosa who
cannot voice their opposing stance such as wildlife. children, and future adult voting populations.
The City Council and Planning Commission giving the amendment consideration is symbolic of your
inditterence toward thosa same people (who pay local, state, and federal taxes) by a govemment who
is not run by the people or for the people.
Even choosing to ignore the cri.. of your populace might be okay If you use YOUR OWN DOLLARS
to finance the rape and abuse of the city's residents, wilcllife, and lpresently) beautiful landscape.
Leave my wallet out of your political endeavors the same way you leave out my viewpoint.
DENY THE ABOVE REQUEST BY CALMATOFRCIALS AND, FOR ONCE, BE TRUE REPRESENTATIVES
OF THE PEOPLE WHO PAY YOUR SALARIES.
--......
.
o
n
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION- '"'.
r
::
....
J..o 1.. ,.. ...&:.. J. ..
SUBJECT: NO. 91~18, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 92-06,
CONDITIONAL USE ?E?~:T NO. 91-31/RECL~~T::N PLAN,
AND TENTATIVE PARCEL ~P NOS. 14106, 14107 & 14108
(W:RD' )
PROPERTY LOCATION:
Th. project site is located on the southwest side of Cajon
Boulevard qenerally between Devore Road and the unincorporated
co_unity of Muscoy (partially) in the county of San Bernardino and
the City of San Bernardino.
DfIloJe
61
PROPOSAL: "'or' 1/ TtI..IMISCOY -lID'" e' ~1ctWr, ·
A proposal to establish land use districts, permitted u...,
development standards and quidelines in ord.r to utilize 1,3'2
acres of land for mineral extractiv., heavy indu.trial, light
industrial, open space uses with mining relat.d int.rim u.... The
project is phased with ultimate buildout at 25 years.
~ 1'.' " :~
C 1,:1 L'. U 1..;' Opposes mining ~":,.Ar..c-~
I I . ,ttft:f'k .-
SAN BERNARDINO .4J.EB 16 1E9 1.:- I. ArewrelidentlorV~f;J).v"oieiDctM- I
COUNCIL CHAMBERS coy received a notice that the J* 28 pIP..II11 -- .
300 NORTH "0" STREET ' mIuIon helrinl on the Callfat IIIIDIDI project In
SAN BERNARDINO. CA ""~1i~~ ~,.~,~ e~~,;.A' .i'~ "~ ' Ca,jonCreekwucaneeJed. , '. ~., ....
"~;l ",,~J. OF, _ ~.,,,,~ ~" _ It hu been rescheduled lbI' Oct. lIO, 10 planMn
_.__".~ ~ '..' c.z ~ ml)'l\artherrevlewtheenvironlllental~
HEARING DATE AND TIME: .. : I ~t the environmental lmpIct report will
":'V' prove that this destructlft IIIIDIDI project ,- 10
Tuesday, February 16,1993 7:00 - cIOHtoestablilhedbllal-_......~fIIl:lI1-
: ties, railroad lines and maJor hI&bw.,a -Is totaJlr
, unacceptable. .'
- The environmental cIocumeDt wt1l ~ tbat it
: would: :,'
. Be environmentally lIIIIAC8 to dlI~ IIIIDe
...sJ:: such hqe pitlln the c..Ion. Cable _ Lyt\e Creek
Ooodwl)', chanlilll the course and fbneorOood wa-
ters which empty Into the Santa ADa RIver 1iI Col-
ton. .' ..
" . Be cIIsutrouI to the hUltllorpeople breath-
illl air polluted with ADd arit __at dIIIt -
~~ to livestock, wildUCe.~. prdenI U1d~
IIV1D1thln1. , :..
. Encroach on the sherIft'. ac:lIllemy _ re-
, lated Cad\ltles. the many recreatkma1 reIOUI'ftI.ln-
eluding the Little Lequeltadlum _ SU1'I'OIIIIIIID
camPFW!!~ natlc!~ l'orat. and moUDt~I~;1
. . tpOlI the sceDlC Deauty""ofGleil Helen tiJOn-
, ai Park. where a hllle amphitheater II pl."".
. Create trafIlc hazards Cor scbool bUIa and
emel'lency vehicles on c..Ion BouIevIrd at june-
t10Dl with Interstates 111 ud 2111 ud at rIiIroad
l'OPfte.i..1ft!
PUBUC HEARING LOCATl
.--....-..........'-..."--
- .._.:I.car"'" ....-...............................
----.............."---..-
..,_I7MI-.
1M""'" c-...._.~. . ___ ,..,,.. . . ..... ... "" -..... .
--.,..fftIJ____In......In_............
,.... MIl....... ...... - ~._4. SIft ......... CIr HIlI. 3>>'" 00-
-...._~D....
~III_"""" c......w......................ftIDWilp. c.n.
_1IIo__"-'T_T__...__
-..........--..........-......-..
............... ...._........._....ClIJClIIII_
-..-..--.........-........,-.........
T_T__.
z-...... -.."-""_...._A........-6.._II..........CoctI
.._.._.........._..1InII1IlIiall.
. ,.......... ......................... a.....~. it...,..,...,
..-........--,...---...-'-'"
..........................._..............ClyPtlnnilgDn...
...-..---
. -..... _ ..~_...............,lInfilM......_
-. I'<<.e",.... ~I .t &0000
~~_~g, ~~~~..~i-._
.A"'iE~.J
r"\ t"\
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
.
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION
.,j
II.
SUBJECT: NO. 91-18, DEVELOPMEN~~CODE'AMENDMENT NO~ 92-06,
CONDITIONAL USE PE~~!T NO. 91-31/RECLAMATION PLAN,
AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NOS. 14106, 14107 & 14108
(W:RO# J
PROPERTY LOCATION:
The' project site is located on the southwest side of Cajon
Boulevard qenerally between Devore Road and the unincorporated
community of MUSCOy (partially) in the County of San Bernardino and
the City of San Bernardino.
PROPOSAL:
Nor I
~'t-
1,
A proposal to establish land use districts, p.rmitted uses,
development standards and quidelines in order to utilize 1,392
acres of land for mineral extractive, heavy industrial, light
industrial, open space uses with mininq related interim u.... The
project is phased with ultimate buildout at 25 years.
PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: .
SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 NORTH .0. STREET
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418
HEARING DATE AND TIME:
Tuesday, February 16, ,1993 7: 00
A__...._..........__.........._
- l/L".ca,NIL.,.-..._................IIICaIIItl.......prior.INI
.......................................... s.vc. ~- ~._..In.......
...........(7WJ_.
1M ........ c...._.~. .. ....... .. .. 'l . ... you .. ...... .
_,..__........IfI.....In__...........
,..,........... .... ai' ilL_A. 1M......... City... 311) Nonft 00-
-...--....,
o..on............. Cl.....~.__......tluildingftW'llntl. ec.
....... ..... ...... ..... II PIInI. T...... T_ .... and v..... ....
_....~..._ _...._... COuncil......_..
......._..........._... ......_.....CllyCllrlcalollg
--"...A<~'" .........-............. (11ft..,. tar P.. u_...
T_T__,
ZDnI.......__PlIrIA._..._~.......IItIl...1tII..UIIic:iItII CGctI
..-..-....-...-,.--
.....-...--.....---...........-
................, _ __,..<<.............. It_ _c....
..................__._.._...,........CilyPllMirlgOMlillln
...-.....--
.~ '~""'L...- _ ..---__~......,.........Mitti__
-- A .;:If ~r I .:l 0
~
r:.:.=.:..~'Tcei
....-:/?_ _II
~SE!Z) at
Opposes mining ~~.4C~" .
A I'ew I'llIidents orVerd~nl.U.~~~ ,:. I
coy reeelved a notice that the July 28 pl."""'I_ I
mission hellrilll on the Call1at 11IIIIIIII proJed; In
. c.i~;:e~~as=:::ed fbr ~::~#.~~L..
~~ may further revI_ the envlnmmentaJ documa&.. .
'" : I elqIeCt the envlnmmentaJ Impact report wfJJ
':"V' prove that this cleatruetlve IIIlIIlq prQject - 10
- close to established lIo,tI-lI., bomeI, COUDQ' tMIIl-
, ties, railroad lines and ma,jor hl&hwara -Ia totaUJ
unacceptable. ,'. e",.".,
. The environmental doeumeot WlII ~that It
: would: .: : ",:,",\. ."
. Be envlronmenta\IJ uuare to'dla' ''''''1DIne
..S1 :. such hllle pits In the Cajon, Cable and Lytle Creek
noodway, cbanllnl the _ and Ibrce oCnooclwa-
, : tera which empty Into the Santa Ana River m Col-
. ton..;: . ,l:-.: . ...... I;.:..
. . Be disastrolll to the health or.peopJe bNath-
1111 air polluted with AIId pit and cement d1llt-
and to livestock, wUdJlCe.'trea, pnJens and.-,.
Iivinlthinl. . {..{ : '-
. Encroach on the .herUI'.. .c.d....)' Ud N-
. lated Cacl1ltiea, the IIWI)' recreational rea~ In-
. elucllnl the Little Leaaue Itadlum and IU1'rGIIIldIIIc
: eamp~~,. ~atiC!JI!l forest. and mOUllt;I~:1
. '&)lOu'the scemc'beauty ortnelillelen ~
, aI Park, where a hllll amphitheater Ia plUllled.
. Create trafl1e \warda for school b_ and
emel'leney vehiel.. on Cajon Boulevard at junc-
tions with Interatates 15 and 215 and at raIJroad
~In&s,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION
,
:....::
.'
BJECT ' . ,L. .j'
SU ~~ ; NO. 91-18, DEVELOPMENT CODE k~ENDMENT NO. 92-06,
S;~ CONDITIONAL USE ?E~!!T NO. 91-31/RECLA}~TION PLAN,
" i!i, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NOS. 14106, 14107 & 14108
PEJQP.~R'TY LOCATION:
~i~'" .': .
S ~:;.~:i'
~~. project site is located on the southwest side . of Cajon
u,JIoulevard qenerally between Devore Road and the unincorporated
~ommunity of Muscoy (partially) in the County of San Bernardino and
the City of San Bernardino. ~ iii
.. '.r~--.
o '. .
'0,
::'-r-
".1 c:.::./
--..J
(W:RD# J
PROPOSAL: NtIT IAI ~ - DliIJoII,jj'_
.,
A proposal to establish land use districts, permitted uses,.
dev.lopment standards and quidelin.s in order to utilize 1,392.
acr.. of land for mineral extractive, heavy industrial, ~J.9~""
industrial, op.n space uses with mininq related interim u.... 'Tbi~,
proj.ct is phased with ultimate buildout at 25 yearp. _.
PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: .
SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 NORTH.D. STREET
SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92418
HEARING DATE AND TIME:
Tuesday, February 16, 1993 7:00
A__...._............................_
- 1l._..CIr...................~...1ftilllf'ClC8al..._
............ .....-..,..,...................~ .._" In .....
..,......I7Nl_.
,.. ,...... ~._.' IV" __ ,........... . ,., _ ......
.... .............__........"'.....iDn......,.........
....... ... ...... ..... - L._.&. 1M ......... Cay Nd. XII Nonh "D"
..... 1M ...._A4. CIIIIInia ..,..
0.-............. c...._.~.__......1Iuiiding rIDfi9.. eon.
_u.o..... _. _ T_T__.... _._
_....~...__....~...c:.u.co_.._..
...............-...._... -.._....ClIyCllrll.....
.... -A .+b.. ......-. .............. (IIn....... PMIII..... MIl
T_T_IlIpIJ..
........ ..........AIL...._.....~4._........uniclIpII Code
.. MOl'r '\ ........ ........... CouncI....IinII--.
.,....-.....__............~.. -'''''11II\'
..-......,--,...-...-....--.
....................--.-...-........UWCltrPlanninoOiwRn
...-.. ..-.....
~~..._-~ ~_M..............M...l'IWK...._
-~iJ;. ":bl I :J 0.3000
'-II lIllol: - -- ~ e. &st!.r J'; DrJA/r __
- _.,
Opposes mining .. - .4ii,.;,~"~ -
. ltItlfk;."'-
A few residents orVerdeaullif; n..w._"'t
co)' received a notice that tbeJub'21 pluu!Iq_
million bearilll on tbe CaJ Mat IIIiIIlIII.JII'Qlee& Ia
Cajon Creek was _led. ;.-...,..........~.
-v- It bu been rescbIcIuJed ftlr Oet.... '10 pI Tn
. mayfltrtberrevl_tbeenYironlllentaJ-- ,. ;.
.. : J expeel the ~taJ lmpMt.~....
':"V' prove thet tIIb deltnlctl.. IIIlIIlaI ..>4nt ........ .
- close to established bu."", bomliI,'~."",
tiel, railroad IinellDd tu,lor.bicIN_,.-iI;-..Ur
. unacceptable. . ~;....,...~~.
The enYirolllllelltaJ document WlDZ' It
: would: '. ,., :r.~' .~.
. Be enYil'Olllll8lltaJl1111111f'e to . .
-S1:: such hllle pits in the CtI01l, Cable 1IIll. CNet
noodw&)', c:huiinIthe COIII'Ie IIIllbworlood_
ters which empty into the Baata AlIa Rhwr.1D ~
ton. ~-: '. ,:,,:~' ...~~>~:.!~~j;.:;.
'. . Be disastrous to the hUlthf.,eopwlir....
in, air polluted with IIftclIrit IIId CIIIIIIIt:duRi-
~~ to ~vestock, wllclllfe, ,treII, prdeu.lIlIl~
II"''''' ...,.- . ..., ...; ,.'c' ,,"'_ ,.;...
._..w....I&. . .. :~. .. .'<;.'~ .....t;.!.V[ft:.....
. Encroach on the 1herIlI'., ~IDd, No
lated facilities. the IIWIJ reereatiallll ~
cludlnl the Little Leque stadlumllld .
caDIP~II{t~ natil!n~ forest. ~ moUD~ .
-, 'POll tile icemCfDeautyormliilliilen~
. aJ Park, where a hllle amphitheater II planned.
. Crea~ tramc hazards for school buRl aad
emel'lency -vehicles on Cajon Boulevard at JIJIIiCo
lions with Interstates 15 and 215 and at nlIroad
crossinn.
t
.
, .
. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING ANO BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF 'PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION
(W:RO' )
SUBJECT: NO. 91-18, DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT NO. 92-06,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-31/RECLAMATION PLAN,
~~D TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NOS. 14106, 14107 & 14108
PROPERTY LOCATION:
The project site is located on the southwest side of Cajon
Boulevard qenerally between Devore Road and the unincorporated
co_unity of Muscoy (partially) in the County of San Bernardino and
the city of San Bernardino. opp~ 7:1il1
1."'-.
:..:=.~
PROPOSAL: ~ IAI 1fUJ.:faH - f)SU:J1L6 - V'
A p;oposal to establish land use districts, permitted us..,
d~oplll.nt standards and quidelines in order to utilize 1,392
~ a~"" of land for lIIineral ~xtra~ive, heavy ~ndu.~rial, 119ht
~:..! i~liPtrial, open space uses w1th 1II1nin9 related 1nt.r1lll u.... The
p~.ct is phased with ultilllate buildout at 25 year..
40'" ..J
'-:'-'
t!;.;:
-""'.r-
."-.
. ~..'.:.
HEARING DATE AND TIME:
Tuesday, February 16,1993
7:00
Opposes mining _ ~.~~
A few relldentl otVd_l.'f;:t.~ ~ f
coy received a notice that the July 28 pIanniJII- ,
mlsslon hearinl on the Call1at IIIlIIlDI proJ_ in
~onCreekwucanceled. _' - -'. ,~,
~. It bu been rescheduled AIr Oct. 20;'10' pl.:"':-
~ mlU' tIIrther review tbe eYirollmDtaI cIoaumML.
.. : I expect the envlro_ta1 lmJllCt repar&..w
':"v' prove that this destructi.. IIIinInI project - 10
- close to establllhed 10..001- --'. boaIeI, IlOIIIItJ 1IIeIIl.
, Ues, ralll'OM1llnes ud l118,\or bIChw.,. -II toUIlr
unacceptable. -- --' -
- The environmental doeIIIIIent WIn ahow tbat it
would:.>>
. Be envirolllllellta1\J uuafe todlC IiId aIine
...s1: such huee pltlin the C~on. Cable ud LJtIe Cnek
noodway, cllanl1l11 the _ ud lbnlI otlloocl_
ters which empty into the Santa AlIa River m C0l-
ton. :. " ..
- , . Be dIIutrolll to the 'bea1th otpeople br tJo-
1111 air polluted with IUId pit and -mcbalt-
and to livestock, wildUf'e. 'ue.. prdeaa and ....,
Iivilllt\Unc. ' ,,'~"
, . El!c:roaeh OD the Iherlft'I 1CId'l1ll', and No
: I.ted f'ae11lties, thellWl)' NCl'UUOnal---..1n-
, cludlng the Little Leaaue ItadiUDI and aurrouadlD&
: camp~, natic!JI!I toreal. ud DIOUIIt~I~:1
. .''Ipo11 the-seeiliCDeaut)'oroleiiBelen~n-
, a1 Park. where a hueeamphitheater II planned.
. Create tral!le 1wardI tor aehool ~ and
, emerpney vehicles on C~OD Boulevard at junc-
tions with Interstates 15 and 215 ud at railroad
~iftn..
,
.
P~U~HEARING LOCATION:
"- .~
C ;'; SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL
n COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 NORTH "0" STREeT
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418
. j -
...
.--....-..........-.........-
- ._J_ClrNIL ...-......................UlilIIf'IDIHt......
----..-...'---..-
."_(7MI_.
1M""'" ~."..b.A. .. ~ ,..,,., r . ....... -.....
__.....,~..._............In............................
_....-.-..... .._...._ClJHII.:lllO_'ll"
_"'_~"'L
_...._---_IallIdiog_Coo-
_.....__.._T_T__..._._
_...._...__..._..._......_i1
.....-..........._........._...CIlyClorll_
"iliA ~ ~........._.,............CIIft..,...P...........
T_T__.
z....... ......,...AI&..4..-A......._4._II.....UI'Iir:iIMII CoN
....... ' ~.................... CluN:lIorIlftlt...
.-.........--....--..-.--
..._.-...,___.---.........-..0
...................__.__A_...........c.,.PlMningDMalln
...-....--
.........1llII _
-
-*
1ft ... 1IliIl1" _
I ,,1 03000
m.:.~.~ ~~ 1
d~
ndP.--.......
~-----
,
cn'Y OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CiTy
OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION ,. :.'
r .......
::
S~~ET: NO. 91-18, DEVE!..OPNENT A."'lENDMENT NO~-'92-06,
~'~~if CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-31/RECLAMATION PLAN,
/t;:./~ AND TENTATIVE P.;RCEL MAP NOS. 14106, 14107 & 14108
.~ .:
(W:RD' J
.,.,
..:....
.~ .'" .j
j~PERTV LOCATION:
1::"51
. 0:- __'
. ."(-..,
-j- The' project site is located on the southwest side of Cajon
Boulevard qenerally between Devore Road and the unincorporated
cODlDlunity of Muscoy (partially) in the County of San Bernardino and
the City of San Bernardino. oP~ ,.
PROPOSAL: tJd'~ MMStJ:t1I-~- ....P'lloN
A propo.al to establish land use districts, permitted uses,'
developm.nt standards and quidelines in order to utilize 1,392
acres of land for mineral extractive, heavy indu.trial, liqht
indu.trial, open space uses with mininq relat.d interim u.... The
proj.ct is phased with ultimate buildout at 25 years.
PUBLIC HEARING LOCATlet1:D 15,fJ:,? n n OpposeS mining ~.;... ~ .
SANBERNAROINodn ~';'~ if W :'1 !-:\ .' AfewresidenborVerd_onl~~<<::'
COUNCIL CHAMBERl' f E 8 f 6 ft't\ l' w! coy received a notice that the July 28 ,,1.""1111_1
300 NORTH .0. STREET ~J. - J minion hearinl on the CaI Mat IIIlIIiDI prOject Ia
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 884-13 ~ ~onCreekw..caneeled. ;~.'
~. . F Sn " . !thai been rescheduJedftirOet.20;lOp......
.... :~, . .01..;' ~ mlYftutherreviewtheen~~L..
HEARING DATE AND TIME: . ......< ,,_.,..,:::~ N . <i.. : r elqIeCt the environmental lmpaat.repoI'l dI
':"V' prove that this destructl". IIIiDIIII prOject_to
Tuesday, February 16, 1993 7: 00 - close to established ",.ol--. hoaIeI, COUDb".1IdJj.
ties, railroad lines and ~ hilhnra-Ia tDtIIlr
unaeeeptable. .~.~'j:>.-. '.
. - The environmental ~t wUlllllow> tbat.1&
: would: .' .,. .iIl.It~.;
. .:"," ..~....
. . Be environmentally UDAli to':'dJa7aiiill1idDe
..S1 ~ such huae pita in the c.lon. Cable ud1.7tJe CNet
noodWIY. chaDIinI the _1IId rone ofllaoll_
. ters which empty lato the Santa ADa JU_Iia'Col-
. ton..:. . . ..,,~~~.;,'
. " ." . "". '. .." 'Or"
, . Be dilutro1ll to the health Or.people'1inI&Il-
: inI air polluted with IUId lrit and oement'duIl-
:. ~~ to livestock, wildU1'e.:ae..1ardenI and~
IIV1111t11in1. ,. .":,''',''','-...:J!o'..:.,,
. Encroach on the IherItl'I --c'iniiir -and re-
lated f'ac:Uities. the many recreatlOnal_e.. iD-
cludinl the Little Leque ltadium andl1ll'rllUlllliD
call1PFu~. nalk!JI!I forest.1IId DIOUD~d1
. 'Jpolfthe ieeDllflltautyOtGleiilIelen n-
ai PU'k. where a huaeamphith_terII plannecL
. Create traftlc. IwardI ftir 1Choo1' bIIIeI and
emel'leney vehicles on c.lon BouJeyI1'li at J--
tions with Interstates 15 and 215 and at n1Iroad
crossinp.
, ....-'1
-.
"
a__...._...........'-..._._-
- ..._.ClrMII....-_................... .............
............._..~_.......... ~ 'LJ....41n....
..,_17141_.
1M ...... Q....--..b..... . ....... ,... _ '.. . ,. _ ......
..........---.................................
..... ....... ..... ~ ..._J. SIn .......... ec, HII. _ Hanh V
_..._~..,..
DllilllMIf.""" c.......~.__........I:IuIIIIing...,..c...
_Uoo__.._ T_T...._... v__
_...~...__..._...CounaI....IIo_~
__.._...._.......IIo_...ClIrCllrll_
......~ ~ II:. .......__..,...............,...P..........
T_T__.
,.............,.. ....._4.._.....AIn...'_A 10" WunicipII Code
....-- , lie.............,. MIl CouncItarlirtallCllClft.
....-....__...."""'*"_11I-...._
110_.........,__....___........,,-..
..............--...........-..........c.,.......DiwUn
...-....---..
.~".~- _ ~ ......_lwelN!ltu.....M""..........__
-'M'''Q.oIl- . ~( I?.J. OS-OOc;l
l#-
Illolll-~
~D~C..:J', <.aJ 16
,
,
n
o
..,
pITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING COMMISSION
,...
::
....
SUBJECT: NO. 91-18, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 92-06,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-31/RECLAMATION PLAN,
AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NOS. 14106, 14107 & 14108
(W;o' )
PROPERTY LOCATION:
The project site i. located on the southwest side of Cajon
Boulevarel qenerally between Devore Road anci the unincorporate4
community of Kuscoy (partially) in the County of San Bernardino and
the City of San Bernardinoo 0PP0 se S
PROPOSAL: 711/3 .... AkIr _ ~ ,,,.,.,,,$
o!
A propo..l to e.tablish lancl use dbtric:ta, peraitted ~.
developlllent standards anel guidelin.. in order to utilize 1,3.2
acre. of land for mineral extractive, h.avy inclustrial,U.pt
inelustrial, open .pac. u... with mining related int.ria~. 1'Iw
project b pba.eelwith ultimate buildout at 25 yeareo
o - Dr"o~- . ~~~.
PUBLlCHEARINGLOCATlON:. ~,.. ~ P i~ nU .;; :-~ ~........ .... ~.".'-
f :J L:.r- L'=' iJ _ of . . ,.
SANBEANARDINOCITY~ -" -I"; ....r ~-"alY.,--- 111__,
COUNCILCHAMBEAS Ui FEB 16 f'Q3 ~r ...... tIIIt tile I..""""" ,
300 NORTH "D" STREET . ... _ ""-ao. ~ ... _ tile CIIIfa& .........,JIl
SAN BERNARDINO. CA12418 -" 81{; .~. ~-II-~~"'~~~"""'"
~ n "'~" I__flll.. .II~ ~ .
Q r . TO ~1_.&1 ~-_"""'Nftlwtlle_..~ .,.
HEARING DATE AND TIME: !lUll. 5.~ : ......tIIe_.it;--- t~l. rl:lt~:.---
~V' ,...... tMl ..... ILa.., u.. .... "id~
Tuesday, February 16, .1993 7: 00 - ~ to ..........-"-d.. . "" ..............
': tiel, nIIroIId 1m. _ ...... hllll w_-;!-li..~
. UR- fl,.... _d.~~:~~,;:'
:" The...h.... --.qodap" ...~.. - ..~.
.WOUICI: . . :,!':\:S: ,.
.Be----~....-e.. '.
~: IIIClIIIUII Sf!: c.lGa. CIIIIe ... . ..
1IoocI..".,c tIIe__... _
. . ten wbIeIllmplJ tile SIIlta Ma'_IiICcII-
ton. ... : ..~~';'~}.~~~.~'.
. . . Be dI8ItrocII to tile ....wa aI. .,.... -.....
=:.:==. :u...~~l ~~.~~=
8u1..,......, '.". . -'. ......'1..
............. I I ." ..,...~. _.
. . ~ CIIl tile .-ur. - 1 _ .......
: fated ,....'...... tbI...., ~~ I J.. ~.
. dudial tile Little Leque ot~ 1IId..~ ~
: ~ "atic!a!I ......IIIIlIU. _~I-
.. .. tpoIlllle._lCfDeaUtJitGIia..,....~
aI ParIl, wilen aluap IIIIPIIltbllter II "'.~.
. . Create trdIe IIauda Jbr ..... ...... _
. ..........".ftIIieIeI CIIl ~ JIaaIeqrd a& __
tioIII witb ........ 11 _ 111 _ 1& niJroId
-"'-
A__..._.......~......._
t J 1 .car..................___............
..........---..................-. L J.,...
..,......PWI_.
'AII.......~. ,.It.......... _ .. .... _ __.
-...----.-...-...-...
~"'''''_7. ....-Clr...__".
"'''L .~CIIIIINI"'"
_............c:.._ I' .....--.......-...c..
-..-. _._ T__........__
-...........-..............--..-.
......-....-...-...-..-...CIr-....
-.... .1>....__......_........._........
T__..... .
.......-_....~-_..A.~4.._............c.
..- ...-..........-......-
..............--.........c:... . iii ._..._
..-.-....,--....---...-.....
..........-...-- ~ rill ..A....CIIr.......~
...-....-.....
. ~....... - ~-... - ~ ...---
-~~ :Hr 17.2.
o~
.
~
mol: -
-, ~
~
.
.~~;;:.~
".' .~._...
'.
.
PROPOSAl.: W5 Ae. oN...
A pz'Opa..1 w ..tutu.. land .. cIlat:riaa, pua1~.
dWeloPMfjt 8tancW:da ad 9'lide11Da ill ozdu' 1:0 =il1.. 1
aana of land for .4~ utnfti.., "'01' iada8tri.a1:, '.
iJdut:J:'ial, opeD 8pac:e ua vitia .h.tWlllJ related ~ia _. Be
proje= i. pbued vitia 1Il~t:8 bllU4oa1: 81: 25 yean.
PUaIC HEAAN3 LOCAllON:
SAN BERNMDINOCITY HALL
COUNCL C1WmEAS
300 NORTH "D" STREET
SAN 8Ef1NARD1NO, CA ..11
r HEARING DATE AND TlioIl='
.
Tu..day, Fe))ruary 16, 1193
_' - ~_.._- .011
..............--.... I __
-....--......-.....---
..,...~_.
.........- .......... '''--
--...... L ~ ~ I .
...........-- -...--..--..
_...- --
- ........- --...............-
-......... -.-. ....----.-
-......--........--..-..-.
..............-..-.. .. ..",1lI' "'"'
.. ,. ---...-.....-...-
....-..... .
... - ---- ... .........
.. ................-....--
..........--........- ..-...~
..-.....- . ...---..-....
......~.. L . - , CI - F ..
".....--... ~ .
. - ....-.. - -..... -
....."
." -
..a.:...
.,.., c:..O.. "'
(!;{,w AA.b 'Ai
~*
~- eo~",,,..,
-- ...,.., ...
,ll~p~.~. mining 0 oIuM4
~.. 'Thlrailn IIWIl/ obvious rellOn& lOr
asisullI&.&- dI!!!~!A.1tlll. m- of. opera.
~ tlon. IUCh u the propelled CaI Mat
.and-lJ'&vel minin& project in C~on
Creek. In an area that hu 10 much es.
tablilhed bllo;n'8ll. 10 many relidenll
and fac:i1itlel, with lIIllIor blihwll)'l and
rallroada. .
The project is environmentally un-
safe beeaue of it beinl in the C~on,
Cable and Lytle emu' noodwlI,)'. Dia-
ging such huge pits would Change the
couneand Ibrc.ornood wate".
It would encroach on tbt sherift'.
aeaclemy and the area's recreational
resoun:es. It would spoil the scenic
beauty of Glen Helen Park;,tbe Little
I.eaaue Iladium and lurroundina
camp,round., naUona. fori'" and
IIICIUna.Jns.
The heavily loaded sand and ...avel
trucks and trailero would create traffic
hazards for sehool b.... and emerge.-
cy vehicles on Clllon Boulevard. at the
junctions ofInterotalel 15 and 215, and
at railroad crossings. The bia rip also
would ruin the roadl.
. It i. di_trous to the health ofpeo-
pie, livestock. pets and native wildlife,
to trees, shrubs, orchards and laWAI.
We must not allow Cal Mat to de-
... ~ stroy the Iood things and create havoc:
, .wiUl our homes, !walth and h'lllPI.....' _
.; . '. . J '1IA1t:tilII~.:aw.
..:A1IIW't:f~~Jf'''J!#!:.~~...._1
...' .
. t..-
... '
. MInIng plans
.
... .,
: The lHeDdIy nellhho" ill Devore,
, Verdelncmtand lI_y received
Ietten hili Calmat MiDinI invitilll
them to taU. bus tour on Sept. 28 to
lIi11io11 Va/ley nw show the COllCePt
they an pl.n.dOl'1Or c.ion CreeIl. . 0
delllOlllll'atesllliDlDa can be
. compatible with a variety ul'land utel."
. H_, that can't cluul&e any of
I the relevant raeta. one ofwhlc:b iI the
problem ofnot beilll able to live a
.~thy life there.
The Calmat proJaet involves lOur
1Vrr- mines, th.... open pita at
depths Of25 to 125 feet (left open) and a
IkimllllDloperatlon; also a batch plant . ,
(cement), sand.....vel and uphalt
plan&.
W.'..-eoneerned about air
-pcilliillon hili sand and _nt dust,
; uphalt,abaust hili tnleu and
I' maehlDerytnolse<24 bo~ a day), high
winds and bad erosion coDditioDllD the
area,
Stay IDfonnecL The IIIItt public
I meelilll II Oct. 20 at ., p,m~ San
,.\ BernardlDo City Hall.
IIIAII_..... .
V.nIelllOllt
I t::iIeT.:. -f ~
.
.,OPlla...~... ""J~
:. A........... .~.-;"y~.~.:_~. .
-- 0IIy~.. aDOtIIe that tbe"..~-.:
. million Martq oa tbe CalI1at IIIIDIDI PI'IIIeet ' .'
: c.ion Creek - _led. , " 0 : -<;I'd
- It hu been .rwdleduIed ... Oct. 20. 10 "
- maylllrtherrevlewtheenrir--taIfl_--,-', ;;,.'.
D I (rC. I ~ I expect the enlrunmantal Impact Npaft
: prove that thiI deltruetive IIIIDIDI project _ 10
I f'J dOle to atablilbed h...-.... bom.. COUDty1lIdD.l
P ,.., II.., railroad lineIand lU,jor blihways - II totallT i.'
~VV unaeeeptable. "
cZ!!f wouT.t' environmental doc:ument willlbow that, ~1
~ . Be environmeDtaII1l1D11fe to cIfI and IIIIDe 1
, IUc:b bllle pllllD the c.l0ll, Cable and LytJe Creek '
OoocIway, dwIgIng the co~ and f'oree ofOoocl_ i
~ wbic:b empty Into tha Santa ADa RIver lD CoJ.~
ton. . ~
. .. cIiIutroUI to the beaJtb of people brutll ..
' IDa air POlluted wttllllDll grit and Ilm.at duK J
' and to Oftltoek, wt1dIUlI,a-, ~ and~
'" ',;oJ UvilllthiDg. ._ ',.'vI'/
""-'V . Eaeroach on the 1IIerUI'. --"-\J and' ' .
p~~':,. 5..1ated fadlill.. the many _~II ~oiDo{J
~,....,.... cludlna the Little League .....- and~
,-" .D. ~ -~ ",,*,~I ~.. .~ ..,~I'!I
UtJ~, · ''IpOUthe_DeaII~-oIGIeDIIeIIIi-R .,...
A A f . lINt;, aI Park,.w.:.,a:FIIDpbl___II.........:......,'
(V, tv' . _ . CNatli . baardI III' '1CIIaGf... . .
/t.41 (.. ~--.-,- ftbIeIII 011 CIdoIIIIoaIftud 8& '.
....IJ ~ ./C, tkma w1t1i In....... 11 and ,111 ~ 8&. ..
'1~~. . ~.......~.--~I:I..ool..--.~ _ ........
A&A '. .. &. '... ... -, "'l!..l""'f"
",::. ......' .. -:!, .~ .,' . :. j,. .
I'nAJb . "'lnIngpIMrai.ci:~'-:'!"
-rrUH tJ,S 'PP " :~:~'"
, 0'" "'. "'~,
. . I......,.-DI!P II CW.....i' .
=:'~-==\:L~ ,'.:'
How ean CIIk ..~o". ..
-tlle_IIIICllla UIIie
tri.. bJ' ~ -, IrueUf on...
mutes ~ emit 3.000 ,....... 01
lutlon a dar. and '18 p"'...... 01'....
will lInd ... ..." IDto ~~.. .
IlIIIIIdaIIr. . "'1: ..'
CalI1al ..... 0lIl' .. -,., J-
only 2 m..... Bat ___ -=:: .
Cajon Pa.. know. w..lla.,.,."..'
reached lOOJDpb.' __.,;;..: "
And wbatabout tbe IaaII . ..,.
lion thiI operatioJl wwId er.te!.,...~.
four JII'OIIOMIIIIIIDiDa pltI __
will be hm 21 to 110 IIat
~-:::::~~tD
ThenoileortM beUland .
IIIadIInery w1IJ lit l1li' 8& aIllloun f1I.
day and _to W.... _ WlIlIId lie
m1I1lODIaI.adq.' ~ :" '. ,.:'-"
We ean't Jet tblI buDM. A
meetllll .01 be bekllt"p.JII.
the plan"'.aftIM.....'..... ~ ~'4 ,.
-'L.: ...~.
Lo
.'
...
.~_.-......_. ~..~....... :......;;
~=~.~~~~~~\
Mat Itrip IIIiDiDIID DIwre. I DOticId ~
she Iiv..1D Barstow. 0tberI1ive DUt to' .
,.
, " ,:, . . ., f r,rijfWfJ 10. ~iir It1~~
.II J f 1 -,111;' A j 'I~ j .1. a '
_ I ,'" d'tr 1 ,...bd,fJE~t1
'I, ,,~~!!! iff1~d ill!' i~liH ~!I~idl
!i . I, )1 1; '~r 1~IJjl J ':~ i~~fi 11;1.1 Iii 11 il
_" ! 'i.,lI' J~'" , ~ fhU I~~" 'nl
! t ' 1ii;/!}1 J~ { I I {Iii l~ i~f liil
,-4~/' . en 'l!r lJ.aU p )')11\111 ~ "
'. . C '. WIU" · a ,i_I' l:; ~ti \ J
_ 'II en ., IIJ .f '1 a .1 i III a '
.c' ~ c fl UiIMff!~J1'f J a, I!Jbl.! J'1..fll']~ "Ill
en b- >. l~la'" ,~I .iJ Iii .5 II · ,'!Jl l!! .!
<c .E a 4 :~JJII~j'll:nlp~'
~ leU 1] ~jlf~~Jh'
.. -'
, ,
"
, ,
'.:>>/$:'
" ..
,"
: _....~.
. .. j:;l . ::..: . .
". ..... ,,".
" ..
,',
"
,
o
ATTACHMENT 7 "A"
o
CalMat Co
::
&~\.
P. 0, BOX 2950. L.OS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90051 (213) 258-2777
3200 SAN FERNANDO ROAD. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90065
April 5, 1993
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. AI Boughey, Director
Department of Planning and Building Services
City of San Bernardino
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92416-0001
f2m~@DW~fnl
APR 0 6 1253 t..YJ
Dear Mr. Boughey:
CiTY OF ('"o~N
DE?AFn.";~~J~ ,~~[~:v:.PD;,r.;o
eUILu!....C :~'~;-;;~~~,l~i..~ Cl
In response to your March 25, 1993 letter, I would like to address the issues raised by
Jay Ellington's, Director, County Parks and Recreation, letter dated March 8, 1993, and to
Dominic Roncace's, Amphitheater Entertainment Corporation, letter dated March 10, 1993.
Jay Ellington is concerned with, " . . . traffic congestion around the park during peak,
park events, " and, "traffic needs for the same Interstate on and off ramps and secondary surface
streets," as it affects CalMat's Cajon Creek Project. He has asked for a number of project
mitigations based on these concerns. These include the restriction of project traffic during
Amphitheater events, and provision of an all-weather crossing of Cajon Creek by Institution
Road, and levee road to access County facilities. A trail easement is also requested.
, 1be relationship of Amphitheater Project traffic to CalMat Cajon Creek Project traffic
was analyzed for the County by Barton-Aschman Associates in a July 10, 1992 report. This
study concluded for both Phase I and Phase n of the project (on pages 27 and 56) that, " . . .
traffIC generation related to the proposed CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan was considered
insignificant with respect to the analysis of traffic impacts associated with the proposed
Amphitheater Project. "
In a more recent study, Charles P. Strong & Associates (enclosed) analyzes Cajon Creek
Project traffic in relation to that of the Amphitheater Project. This study concludes that, "the
CalMat Project and Amphitheater Project would be highly compatible in that they would present
the least possible traffic conflicts of any development land uses in the area."
Since traffic from CalMat's Project is at a maximum during working hours of the week
while that of Amphitheater and park use are during the evenings and weekends, we see no basis
.-
.-
o
o
Mr. AI Boughey, Director
Page 2
April 5, 1993
&\\.. ..
for concern regarding a conflict between these two projects as well as other park events. Nor
do we see any justification for restricting Cajon Creek Project traffic or burdening the project
with additional off-site improvements.
In addition, CalMat's improvements to Cajon Boulevard, as well as the intersections of
Cajon Boulevard with Kendall, and Cajon Boulevard with Palm Avenue and Institution Road,
will improve traffic flow from the Amphitheater Project and other park uses.
Cajon Creek Project traffic flows from the east towards Interstate 215 and does not cross
Cajon Creek. Since the County's facilities are west of Cajon Creek, an all-weather crossing of
the Creek would seem to be the County's responsibility if traffic from the Amphitheater Project
or other park uses requires such a crossing for access purposes.
Likewise, we see no justification for requiring that Ca1Mat build a levee road to access
Amphitheater parking lots 1-9 which are adjacent to the park and north of our project. Parking
lot access for park events is clearly the County's responsibility.
Analysis by Ed Dilginis in the attached March 29, 1993 report indicates that 90% of
traffic from a maximum Phase IT event (from the Amphitheater) can be accommodated by
parking lots 1-9. The remaining 10% would be accommodated in the overflow lots, south of
the park, which represents only 50% of overflow lot capacity. Thus, Barton-Aschman
projections for Amphitheater traffic along Palm Avenue-Institution Road to the overflow lots is
about 42 % less than indicated.
Other alternatives to use of the overflow lots, which will reduce the need for the use of
Palm Avenue and Institution Road, are identified in Ed Dilginis' report. We feel that these
alternatives should also be considered by the County.
CalMat has added a trail easement through the open space area of its Cajon Creek Project
area for recreational and equestrian use as a condition of approval.
We believe Dominic Roncace's concerns about traffIc are addressed above. Regarding
Mr. Roncace's concern about dust, CalMat is also concerned about this issue and has designed
its mini", operations accordingly. For example, mini", and reclamation are phased to m;nim;7.e
surface disruption. The best available technology will be utilized to suppress dust at its source,
such as transfer-point bag houses, foggers, plant wash downs, etc. In addition, windbreaks and
other dust control measures will be utilized around our processing facilities to minimi7.e the
effects of high winds on dust generation.
o
o
Mr. AI Boughey, Director
Page 3
April 5, 1993
&~\.
We should note that the Amphitheater Project has 239 acres of unpaved parking lots.
As an adjacent landowner we are concerned about the potential impacts of dust generated from
these areas on CalMat's Project particularly since they are located up wind from the project
area. Due to the stringent measures we will be taking to control dust we are also concerned
about upwind sources which may not be so strictly regulated and controlled.
We are looking forward to meeting with the you, Jay EI1ington, and Dominic Roncace
to discuss these issues in more detail.
Sincerely,
w,
. Sprague
ana
Reclamation and Special Projects
DWS:sg
xc:
Valerie Ross
..Deborah Woldruff
MJSCDOCS\DSIBOUGIlEY.LTR
<:) ATTACHMENT 7
"Bf1
o
III
-
NEW HORIZONS
::
Planning Consultants, Inc.
341 West Broadway, # 282 . San Diego, CA 92101 . 619 233.9707
March 29, 1993
Mr. Doug Sprague
CalMat Co.
3200 San Fernando Road
Los Angeles, CA 90065
Re: A Review of Possible Alternative Routes of Access for Glen
Helen Park Amphitheater Events and Their Relationship to
Planned Parking Facilities
Dear Mr. Sprague:
A recent evaluation of potential traffic conflicts between
the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan and the Amphitheater project
prepared by Charles P. Strong and Associates (March 23, 1993)
concluded, as did the Amphitheater Traffic Study prepared for the
County by Barton-Aschman & Associates (July 10, 1992), that there
will be no significant conflict between these projects. This is
because the Amphitheater will generate large traffic volumes at
times when CalMat's industrial development and construction
aggregate traffic will not. In total, these two projects
represent a good combination of compatible land uses whose traffic
dovetails quite nicely with respect to utilization of the area's
roadway system.
At your request, I looked briefly at possible alternative
routes of access for Glen Helen Park Amphitheater events, and
their relationship to planned parking facilities. The following
are my observations:
. Phase 1 Amphitheater events would be attended by a
maximum of 16,800 persons. At a vehicle occupancy rate of 3.0, a
total of 5,600 parking spaces would be required. Figure 6 of the
Barton-Aschman study indicates that 56 percent of total Phase 1
event traffic, which will be to and from the south on I-15 (toward
Rialto), will use the I-15/Sierra Avenue interchange via Lytle
Creek and Devore Roads. Of the remaining 44 percent, 28 percent
of the total traffic would be to and from the south on I-215
(toward San Bernardino), and 16 percent would be from the north on
I-15 through Cajon Pass. This 44 percent would utilize the
existing I-215/Devore Road interchange. Figure 6 of the Barton-
o
o
Mr. Doug Sprague
March 29, 1993
Page 2
Aschman Study shows that all of this traffic would be destined for
parking lots located immediately adjacent to the Amphitheater,
accessed directly off Devore Road. Inbound Phase 1 traffic is
assumed by the Amphitheater traffic study to be uniformly
distributed over a two hour (6:00 to 8:00 p.m.) period before each
weekday event.
It is expected that upon completion of the new I-15/Devore
Road freeway interchange required by the Glen Helen Park Master
Plan for events that exceed 16,800 attendance, Phase 1 traffic
after that time would be directed to the new interchange.
According to the Barton-Aschman study traffic assignment (Figure
6), there would be no need for Phase 1 traffic to utilize
I-215/Palm Avenue or Institution Road. Consequently, there would
be no need for any Institution Road improvements or the need to
use potential overflow parking at the Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV)
facility or the former Cajon Creek Landfill. It appears that
there would be more than enough spaces around the Amphitheater to
accommodate the maximum Phase 1 parking requirement of 5,600 cars,
based on the CUP plans.
. Phase 2 events, planned to occur by 1996 after
completion of the new I-15/Devore Road freeway interchange, would
have a maximum attendance of 65,000 persons. It is understood
that this maximum attendance would only be expected to occur one
to three times per year. Most other events would be somewhat
smaller in size. Inbound major event traffic is expected to be
uniformly spread over four hours (4:00 to 8:00 p.m.) preceding
such weekend events. Given a projected vehicle occupancy of 3.5
per car, a total of 18,570 parking spaces would be required.
Figure 11 of the Barton-Aschman traffic study indicates that
56 percent of the total inbound traffic would be from the south on
1-15 (toward Rialto), representing a 10,400 space parking demand.
This traffic would utilize the existing I-15/Sierra Avenue and the
new I-15/Devore Road freeway interchanges. An additional 16
percent of total inbound traffic from 1-15 to the north (Cajon
Pass), representing a 2,960 space parking demand, would also
utilize the new I-15/Devore Road interchange. The 13,360 space
parking demand from these sources could be more than adequately be
accommodated by the 16,635 parking spaces in Lots 1 through 9
shown on the latest Amphitheater CUP Plan. Even at a maximum
attendance Phase 2 event, approximately 3,275 (or about 20
percent) of these available spaces would be unused, given the
Barton-Aschman traffic assignment.
. Figure 11 of the Barton-Aschman traffic study indicates
that approximately 28 percent of the 18,570 total spaces (or 5,200
spaces) required to serve maximum attendance Phase 2 events should
o
o
Mr. Doug Sprague
March 29, 1993
Page 3
::
be located in the "South" parking lot to serve trips to/from the
south on 1-215 (toward San Bernardino). All of this traffic would
be expected to utilize the I-215/Palm Avenue freeway interchange.
It is expected, given the Barton-Aschman traffic study assumptions
and the current Amphitheater CUP Parking Plan, that this 5,200
space demand would utilize the 3,000-space Overflow Lot A Off-
Highway Vehicle (OHV) Park, and some of the 6, 630-space Overflow
Lots Band C (former County Landfill) parking. Of the 9,630
parking spaces available in the "South" parking lots (Overflow
Lots A, B and C), only 5,200, or slightly over half of those
available, would be required. Since only a maximum of 3,000 cars
would be able to utilize Overflow Lot A at the OHV Park, this
would reduce the 1,300 vehicle inbound traffic per hour shown on
Barton-Aschman's Figure 11 as utilizing Institution Road across
Cajon Creek Wash by around 42 percent; thus, there would be that
much less of a traffic demand on Institution Road west of Cajon
Boulevard (42 percent less) than shown on Figure 11.
. Looking at maximum AmPhitheater parking demand without
regard to the Barton-Aschman traffic assignment, Parking Lots 1
through 9 (16,635 total spaces) could accommodate approximately 90
percent of the projected maximum Phase 2 event traffic 18,570
total parking space requirement. This also means that events of
up to 58,200 attendance could be accommodated by these close-in
lots. It is not known what "average" attendance at major events
would be, but it is understood that 65,000 person events would
probably only occur one to three times per year. Therefore, it is
possible that, most of the time, there would be sufficient parking
in Lots 1 through 9, and that none of the more distant Overflow
Lots A through C (OHV Park and former Landfill) would be needed--
provided that sufficient access were available.
. In addition to the fact that planned parking lots in the
vicinity of the Amphitheater (Lots 1 through 9) could probably
meet the needs of Phase 2 major events most of the time, it
appears that much of the excess parking capacity that would be
expected to be available in Overflow Lots A, Band C (9,630
spaces) could not be effectively utilized by major events because
they must rely on the I-215/Palm Avenue freeway interchange for
access. The reason for this is that it is unlikely that much more
traffic than the 1,300 cars per hour indicated by the Barton-
Aschman study could be handled by the existing Palm Avenue
interchange, because the capacity of the northbound freeway off-
ramp and its intersection with Palm Avenue could quickly become
overloaded and break down, and inbound event traffic could back up
onto the main freeway lanes. This would be an extremely
undesirable situation. This high traffic loading (which would not
be compounded by CalMat Cajon Creek traffic because of different
peak traffic demands) could also be exacerbated by periodic
o
o
Mr. Doug Sprague
March 29, 1993
Page 4
freight train crossings of several minutes duration. Thus,
unless, another means of direct freeway access from I-215 is
utilized, excess parking capacity in the "South" lots cannot be
used effectively.
. The I-215/Devore Road freeway interchange is not shown
on the Barton-Aschman traffic study (Figure 11) as being used by
major Phase 2 events. Thus, the present primary entrance to Glen
Helen Park and the Amphitheater (Devore Road from Cajon Boulevard)
will be unused. This appears to be a major deficiency in
maximizing utilization of the existing roadway network, and in
fully utilizing planned Amphitheater Parking Lots 1 through 9.
Available access also exists using Kendall Drive north of Palm
Avenue. This is also not shown as being utilized in Figure 11.
Kendall Drive is not only a direct route to the Cajon
Boulevard/Devore Road intersection (Glen Helen's present main
point of access), but it is aligned directly with the Palm
Avenue/southbound I-215 freeway on-ramp, making it especially
convenient for departing event traffic destined for I-215 south.
If use of the I-215/Devore Road freeway interchange for
northbound I-215 incoming traffic is determined to be undesirable
because of Devore Community concerns, northbound I-215 inbound.
traffic for up to 58,200 attendance events (the total amount that
could be accommodated by Lots 1 through 9) could be directed
northward on Kendall Drive from the Palm Avenue interchange, to
Devore Road west. This would provide several miles of queuing
distance for backed-up traffic, which would be available in the
event of railroad crossing delays that could, for example, back up
heavy traffic flows onto northbound I-215 if all of the incoming
northbound I-215 traffic were directed onto Institution Road as
planned.
Given maximum 65,000 attendance Phase 2 events, the 10
percent remaining traffic that would attend major Phase 2 events
of more than 58,200 (in excess of that which could be accommodated
by the planned capacity of Parking Lots 1 through 9) could be
directed to use Institution Road to reach Overflow Lot A at the
OHV Park. Parking for this final 10 percent (the difference
between a 58,200 and 65,000 attendance) representing a demand of
approximately 1,940 spaces, could more than be adequately
accommodated by the 3,000 space Overflow Lot A. Again, use of
Overflow Lot A parking might only be required one to three times
per year. Otherwise, it would not be necessary for Phase 2
Amphitheater traffic to use Institution Road.
. The potential exists for incoming traffic from the north
on 1-15 (through Cajon Pass) to exit at I-15/Kenwood Drive and be
directed onto a largely unused portion of Cajon Boulevard, which
o
o
Mr. Doug Sprague
March 29, 1993
Page S
in this area is an approximately one-mile long divided roadway.
This could potentially allow up to 16 percent of total incoming
traffic to be removed from the new I-1S/Devore Road interchange,
as shown on the Barton-Aschman traffic assignment (Figure 11).
A means of direct access to Parking Lots 1 through 9 across the
Wash (and under the I-1S viaduct) would have to be found. Altern-
atively, perhaps this unused roadway and areas adjacent to it
could be used for parking some or all of the approximately 3,000
cars which this traffic would represent, using a shuttle bus
system to move people to the park. Maybe Caltrans would consider
building a Park'n Ride lot in this area which could be jointly
used.
One advantage to this potential option would be that it would
free up significant I-1S/Devore Road southbound Off-ramp capacity
to accommodate the equivalent of around half of the total traffic
that would be coming from the south on I-21S (from San
Bernardino). Another advantage would be that if off-site parking
for even around 2,000 cars could be provided in this area, this
would more than adequately off-set the previously-discussed need
to park the "final" 10 percent of total traffic in Overflow Lot A
for maximum 6S,000 attendance events. It would also obviate the
need to use any of the remote parking spaces in Overflow Lots B
and C, and eliminate problems involved with moving attendees
parking in these distant areas to Amphitheater seating.
. Perhaps the greatest potential for securing accessible
parking for major Phase 2 event attendance (in lieu of Overflow
Lots at the OHV Park and the former Landfill) is with the new
International Raceway proposed to be built at Glen Helen Park in
the Lytle Creek Wash area to the west of the Amphitheater. While
utilization of such parking might have to be shared, or planned
raceway parking capacity increased to accommodate both, optimal
utilization of the I-1S/Sierra Avenue and new I-1S/Devore Road
freeway interchanges could result. Since plans for this proposed
raceway have not been reviewed, suggestions on how a symbiotic
access/parking relationship could be developed cannot be offered
at this time.
. In summary, it appears that the Glen Helen Amphitheater
Phase 1 project will be able to have direct access and sufficient
parking without utilization of the I-21S/Pa1m Avenue interchange
or Institution Road. In addition, it appears that a number of
options, as identified herein, exist to further improve incoming
(as well as departing) Phase 2 event traffic access, and to more
effectively use planned parking in close proximity to the
Amphitheater. This would also reduce or eliminate problems
.-
o
o
Mr. Doug Sprague
March 29, 1993
Page 6
associated with moving attendees from remote overflow parking
areas at the OHV Park and former County landfill to the
Amphitheater.
It is also once again apparent that there will be no
significant conflict between CalMat Cajon Creek project and
Amphitheater traffic. Given realistic options which are
available, there is also little, if any, need for major event
traffic to utilize Institution Road, or perhaps even the I-
2l5/Palm Avenue interchange. It appears that resolution of
remaining Amphitheater access problems can be accomplished by the
County and its Amphitheater operator, independent of CalMat.
Very truly yours,
Ed~1~
Principal Land Use/
Transportation Planner
Attachments:
A. Number of Parking Spaces to be Provided for Glen Helen
Park Amphitheater per Conditional Use Permit
B. Amphitheater Conjitional Use Permit Parking Lot Locations
C. Phase 1 Barton-Aschman Traffic Assignment (Figure 6)
D. Phase 2 Barton-Aschman Traffic Assignment (Figure 11)
o
o
A'I'TA.CRMEN'l' ..
NUMBER OF PARleING SPACES TO BE PROVIDED FOR
GLEN BELEN PARle AMPHITHEATER PER CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT
The following Amphitheater parking data were derived from the
CUP Plans provided by the County of San Bernardino Regional Parks
Department.
Parkina T,ot ).~T@a9P- No of SpR('!es
1 41.5 4,565
2 19.7 2,165
3 14.8 1,625
4 13.8 1,510
5 (apparently deleted from plans)
6 17.9 1,970 (Lots 1
through 9
7 24.0 2,640 Total =
16,635 Spaces)
8 7.6 840
9 12.0 1. ~20
Overflow A 27.3 3,000
(Overflow
Overflow B 29.3 3,220 Lots A, B, C
Total -
Overflow C 31.0 3,410 9,630 Spaces)
TOTAL: 239 2 A.crp-:s 26.265 ~p.8('!~!=t
, I
.f~
" ',~I.~"
, ' I' '"
":. !. ~~
j:.;
It~i
I' 11'
~,.',
: I ,
1L . ~".
Pi -",
If'" ..
~',j Iii
- '
! i
.
a
0
...
..
, .
0
:I
;, ..
:I
:
...
, I; I 1l
.
.
I, 1 I ~ . J I fi
d I' '!
' . . .
'I I i, M
I .
..
.
.
...
..
:il
f
o
o.
f4 I
Cl
. 0
B ....
~
CI -:-,
H 1Il'tl
rIl ='
rIl .....
.c \lIrIl
U .U
H ~004
.. r.. g,::
u a 004_
r..~
f4 f4 f4
.
B PI ..
. Cl
u_
u .. ~J
.c rIl
f4 ~ OU
~ rill!
III ....c
w
a:
~ Qz a co ::
< u:
u
co
o
l-
I-
o
Z
~ j
-
B~ otw
.. !!..... 1""_
C! ~..ltii i...
~id;~~ f ;U
I;oa!t:'- ~i!
1-..""::- filoi
. i B-!"! liiot!:
I -1!!N!!a1j : d.l
lil i,lt"6 Bj .Ilia
f:!if!lii:l ::i
~ l:r":I~i Ii.!!
.. ...-e:.... Cot ~ i-
~ I .loril~Llie! ~:
.i s S S
.
.-
--
.
:E
A.
o
o
..
co
Q
Z
<
:E
A.
o
o
..
co
Z
III
III
==
t-
III
m
(I)
III
:E
:)
...
o
>
a:
:)
o
:c
I
~
< ~.
III a:
A. <
>-~A.
<cri'"
ew<
~....~ Z
W 0
W -
== c:J
"I~
0"
w Z
"I W
f5~'
ttzr
=~ ~";
= c:J
;a:
A.
:E
<
0 0
-I W
0:'
I Gz ~ ;:.
.. c:
III 0
~ ~
101
.-
eI IQ:>,
M "
III . ::I
III ..t~ .
.c ..till :&
u eU A-
M 101-.1
.. .. c.:l CI
Q a CI
..
-.I. eD
,,101
.. .. ..
III
B N ..
ea l:2
~J ~9
u II
.c III ~i
.. = ou
.. III I!
.c III "'.c
a:
l
~
IJ
jJ tI ~i J .f
i ~;~ -h
i!J~~ lb-
. ;j IJ~2 l...sl
'li~ I: j I
ll~ii~U I~J
li Ii! !&~ Ii!'
;. 'I'~j; ')'11
~ !~ J.) ~ If..
.. t 5J J,
m J 1 illJ m!l
2eB l3
.
a:
w
l-
e
w
::
l-
i
A-
:&
e
o
ATTACHMENT 7
"C"O
Charles P. Strong & Associates
6241'Del Cerro Boulevard
San Diego, CA 92120
March 23, 1993
Mr. Doug Sprague
CalMat Co.
3200 San Fernando Road
Los Angeles, CA 90065
Re: Potential Traffic Conflicts Between CalMat Cajon Creek
Traffic and Glen Helen Amphitheater Events
Dear Mr. Sprague:
At your request, I have examined concerns expressed by Mr. Jay
Ellington, Director of the County of San Bernardino Regional Parks
Department in his March 8, 1993 letter to Mayor W.R. Holcomb. These
concerns relate to traffic congestion around the park during peak park
event use. Mr-. Ellington's primary concern is utilization of freeway
ramps and secondary surface streets by both CalMat project and proposed
Amphitheater events during the same time periods.
According to Mr. Ellington's March 8th letter, as well as dis-
cussions held at a meeting attended by you and Mr. Ellington on March
18, 1993, and information contained in the July 10, 1992 Barton-Aschman
Site Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Amphitheater project,
there are two types of Amphitheater events of concern. The first is
Phase 1 level events which would involve maximum attendance of 16,800.
Phase 2, which would involve Amphitheater expansion, would allow a
maximum attendance of 65,000. Construction of a new Devore Road freeway
interchange with I-15 would be required for Phase 2 events.
It is our understanding that Phase 1 events would occur primarily
on weekdays, beginning at 8:00 p.m. Incoming Phase 1 event traffic is
projected to occur over a two-hour period, between 6:00 and 8:00 p.m.
Major Phase 2 events would occur on weekends and holidays, at 8:00 p.m.
Incoming Phase 2 traffic would be distributed over a four-hour periOd,
between 4:00 and 8:00 p.m.
In order to determine the nature of any potential conflicts
between CalMat project traffic and that of Phase 1 and 2 Amphitheater
events, I have examined in detail the projected daily distribution of
industrial development and aggregate truck traffic which will result
from the CalMat project. The hourly distribution of the aggregate truck
traffic component was determined by the results of an actual survey of
another CalMat aggregate production facility of similar size, offering a
similar product mix. The hourly distribution of the industrial traffic
component was based on the results of studies conducted by Caltrans.
o
o
Mr. Doug Sprague
March 23, 1993
Page 2
with regard to Phase 1 events, these data indicate that industrial
park weekday inbound traffic (which would be in the same direction as
incoming event traffic) between 6:00 and 7:00 p.m. would be less than
one percent of the total daily inbound industrial park traffic, while
the outbound traffic during this time (which would be in the non-
conflicting direction) would be 4.1 percent of the total daily outbound
traffic. Inbound industrial park traffic between 7:00 and 8:00 p.m. on
weekdays would also be less be less than one percent of total daily
inbound traffic, while the outbound traffic would be 1.5 percent of the
total daily outbound industrial park traffic. These traffic levels
would not significantly impact Amphitheater weekday event traffic. In
fact, roadway improvements to be installed by CalMat as a result of its
project would greatly assist the movement of Amphitheater traffic,
especially through the Cajon Boulevard/Palm Avenue/Institution Road
intersection. CalMat industrial park traffic after the hours of 8:00
p.m. would be negligible and not significantly affect outbound
Amphitheater traffic after Phase 1 events.
with regard to the CalMat aggregate truck traffic component, a
study performed by Federhart & Associates indicated that such weekday
traffic between 6:00 and 8:00 p.m. and later hours would be insignif-
icant, and present no conflict with Amphitheater Phase 1 traffic.
Major Phase 2 Amphitheater events would present even less conflict
potential, since Saturday and Sunday industrial park traffic represents
only around 20 percent and 8 percent of average weekday industrial park
traffic, respectively. The average hourly weekend inbound industrial
park traffic component (which would potentially conflict with incoming
Amphitheater traffic) wo~ld, again, be less than one percent of total
inbound industrial park traffic. Saturday aggregate truck traffic would
not be expected to conflict with late afternoon and evening event
traffic because of projected low levels of aggregate plant traffic-
generating activity at these times. The aggregate plant will not
operate on Sundays.
As a result, it is concluded that the CalMat project and Glen
Helen Amphitheater project would be highly compatible in that they would
present the least possible traffic conflicts of any development land
uses in the area. As a result, it is unnecessary to curtail the flow of
CalMat trucks during events that exceed 7500 anticipated attendees, as
was requested. These findings concur with the conclusions reached in
the Amphitheater Project's Barton-Aschman traffic study (see attached).
The existing capacity of the two-lane Institution Road under
the Southern Pacific Railroad overcrossing exceeds the projected
Amphitheater traffic levels shown in the Barton-Aschman study.
Thus, it is not necessary to widen Institution Road west of the
railroad to four lanes to accommodate even Phase 2 major event
~
o
o
Mr. Doug Sprague
March 23, 1993
Page 3
traffic. In addition, because there will be no CalMat aggregate
truck traffic or industrial park traffic crossing the Cajon Creek
Wash, there is no need to construct an all-weather crossing on
Institution Road.
I trust the above has adequately responded to Mr. Ellington's
concerns. Should you require any additional information, please
let me know.
s~e/l;, ) j j--__
~/~
Charles P. Stro~
Registered Traffic Engineer
Attachment: Pages 26. 27 and 56 of the Barton-Aschman
Amphitheater Traffic Study dated July 10. 1992
---- n_. --0--
----
.. - - --- -- -~._-=- -------
.
U
2
-
..
en
w
I-
c:t
-
u
0
en
en
c:t
2
c:t
:E
:J:
U
en
c:t
I
2
I 0
l-
I 0::
c:t
~
I ~
I
II p..,den,
Celifomill
I
,
I
I ,
SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANAL YSIS
OF
THE PROPOSED GLEN HELEN REGIONAL
PARK AMPHITHEA TER
IN THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
.
Prepared for
Amphitheater Entertainment Corporation
July 10, 1992
l
I
I
I
I
I,
I
.
.
II
o
o
~1i~1nlbe vicinity of the Project site and beyond. These trip sources
are discussed in the succeeding sections.
existing Traffic
For the purpose of the analysis, it was assumed that the ~992 Friday traffic vo1u~ summarized
on Figure 2Jfill remain in eff~t" at the time of Project operation in 1991
Other Non-Project Traffic
The other component of future (1993) non-Project traffic is the traffic generated by other
proposed projects in the study area. Based upon discussions with the County of San Bernardino
and the City of San Bernardino, the only non-Project development in the vicinity of the Project
site under formal ~Q$idrQljnn ..is the Ool~ Cajon Creek Specific P1in, a development
currently u~er review by the'City of San Bernardino.
Located along the west side of Cajon Boulevard between approximately Devore Road (on the
north) and Institution Road (on the south), the Ca1Mat Cajon Creek Specific Plan, if approved,
would permit light industrial, heavy industrial, aggregate processing, and mining uses to be
developed over the next 25 years. Based upon data presented in Traffic Report, CDlMar-Oljon
Creek Project, Charles P. Strong & Associates, August 30, 1991, the CalMat project would be
Av~~jn.R.!!.~~: between 1992 and 1997, the Near .:rerm development would generate
approximately tl99 ~ps per day; between 1997 and 2007, the Intermediate Term deve10pment
would generate an additional 1,123 Vips per day, thereby resulting in a total of 9,722 trips per
.
day by approximately 2007; and between 2007 and 2017, the Long Term development would
generate an ~4!&f;lnalJ,~5.trips per day, thereby resulting in a total of 19,417 trips per day
upon project completion in approximately 2017. However, notwithstanding the magnitude of
the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan as presently proposed, its trip generation and resulting
impact in 1993 \Ipon the operation of the proposed Glen Helen Regional Park Amphitheater
. 'would be negligible for the following reasons:
, , ...
. Considering the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan has yet to be approved, the eventual
Near Term phase (1992-1997) presumably will include little, if any, development by
1993. Thus, tne traffic generation from the CalMat project also will be minor in 1993;
--..
26
-,
.
.
i...
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
o
::
.
The majority of the.-hnf1 development iati&httIld bea1)' _uotria) uses. As cited
on p. 13 of the aforementioned CalMat traffic study, these industrial uses will generate
S,844 or 68 percent of the total Near Tenn development's generation of 8,599 daily
trips. Because industrial uses typically generate few vehicular trips after 6:00 PM on a
.. .
weekday, the presence of CalMat's industrial traffic during the critical two-hour period
(6:00 PM to 8:00 PM) immediately preceding a Friday evening concert will be
insignificant in 1993 (as well as upon the completion of the entire CalMat project);
.
In relation to the preceding item, the!1'- _ Id.lJe$ ~J1.IPrlsing the Near Tenn phase
include ~I!Jate."plants and Jour construction material user parks. These non-
industrial uses, which will generate the remaining 2,75S or 32 percent of the total Near
--~
Tenn development's generation of 8,S99 daily trips, also would be expected to generate
the vast majority of their vehicular trips ~..,,~ PM 011. typical wr-' ~y. Thus,
similar to the light and heav,y industrial uses, because CalMat's non-industrial uses'
ttaffic after 6:00 PM on a typical weekday would be insignificant, said traffic will have
_ a !!S.lig~ if!!P!Ct upon traffic flow in the vicinity of the Project site during the critical
~bOUr period (6=00 PM to.8:00 PM) immediately preceding a Friday evening concert;
and
. As is discussed in detail in Chapter 4 of this report concerning Project-generated ttaffic,
the Palm Avenue corridor IJ'Ij the Cajon Boulevard corridor (south of Devore Road) will
.1Uf~;!ll)';e .utilized by Proj!'Ct-aenerated traffic for concerts containing 16,800
persons or less.. This is due to the fact that concert traffic approaching from the south
on 1-215 will be "advised" with freeway signing to bypass the Palm Avenue interchange
in favor of the Devore Road interchange. Thus, the Palm Avenue-I-2IS interchanie, as
well as Cajon Boulevard south of Devore Road, will otherwise be "available" for non-
Project traffic, and because said transportation facilities would accommodate the m/ljoriry
of the CaIMat traffic, few conflicts between Project and CalMat traffic will occur.
Based upon the above, traffic generation related to the proposed CalMat Cajon Creek Specific
Plan was considered insignificant with respect to the analysis of traffic impacts associated with
the proposed Project.
--
27
-,
o
o
The future non-Project traffic condition includes (a) existing traffic volumes and (b) volumes to
be generated by other development proposed in the vicinity of the Project site and beyond.
These trip sources are discussed in the succeeding sections.
Existing Traffic
For the purpose of the analysis, it was assumed that the 1992 Saturday traffic volumes
summarized on Figure 3 will remain in effect at the time of Project operation in 1996 with one
exception. Specifically, traffic generated by the Renaissance Pleasure Faire was deducted from
the volumes on Figure 3; this was necessary due to the fact that the 1996 with-Project scenario
would 1/01 include the operation of the Faire on the same day as a 65,OOQ-person concert.
Other Non-Project Traffic
The other component of future (1996) non-Project traffic is the traffic generated by other
proposed projects in the study area. Based upon discussions with the County of San Bernardino
and the City of San Bernardino, the only non-Project development in the vicinity of the Project
site under formal consideration is the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan, a development
currently under review by the City of San Bernardino.
Located along the west side of Cajon Boulevard between approximately Devore Road (on the
north) and Institution Road (on the south), the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan, if approved,
would permit a variety of light industrial, heavy industrial, aggregate proce1chlg, and mining
uses to be developed over the next 25 years. However, because such uses typically are not in
operation on weekends, the vehicular trip generation associated with the CalMat Cajon Cleek
Specific Plan would be insignificant between 4:00 PM and 8:00 PM on Saturday, the 1996
design period for the proposed amphitheater (as well as upon the completion of the entire
CalMat project). Therefore, traffic generation related to the proposed CalMat Cajon Creek
Specific Plan was considered insignificant with respect to the analysis of traffic impacts
associated with the proposed Project.
In order to reflect ambient traffic growth in the vicinity of the Project site, a vehicular growth
rate of 5 percent per year was utilized on all existing intersection volumes. This growth rate
was stipulated by the City of San Bernardino and afftrmed by the County of San Bernardino.
--..
56
-
o
ATTACHMENT 8
"A" 0
CalMat Co
s).\..
P. Q. BOX 2950. LOS ANGELES,CAl.IFORNIA 90051 (213) 258-2777
3200 SAN FERNANDO ROAD. LOS ANGEl.ES. CALIFORNIA 90065
April 9, 1993
Mr. Al Boughey
Director
Department of Planning
and Building Services
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92416-0001
1D)~~~UW~lID
Ln) APR 1 2 1993
,In Of SAN IERNAhLm,Q
otF'^~TMENT OF PI....NNiNG &
~ "ILDING SeRVICES
Dear Mr. Boughey:
In response to your March 25, 1993 letter, I would like to address the issue of San
Joaquin Valley Fever which was raised at the February 16, 1993 Planning Commission hearing on
CalMat's Cajon Creek project. A schematic depiction of the windbreaks proposed for the project is
also provided.
As discussed in the enclosed report by Hans Giroux, San Joaquin Valley Fever is caused
by the spores of a soil-borne fungus known as Coccidioides Immides, which usually results in upper
respiratory infections in affected individuals. These fungus spores are most common in, and are
generally limited to, soil depths of eight to ten inches. It is most important to recognize that this soil-
borne fungus does not occur in significant amounts throughout all of Southern California. Research
and empirical evidence have shown that it appears to exist in response to certain soil characteristics,
and climatic, vegetative, and other ecological conditions. Its geographic "hot spot" in Southern
California is Kern County, where visitors and newly arrived residents and farm workers not previously
exposed to this common fungus are particularly susceptible.
Kirt Emery of the San Bernardino Public Health Department characterizes the overall
risk of this disease to San Bernardino residents as low. This is not considered to be a high endemic
area, as is Bakersfield or Kern County. Research studies have shown that many of the cases reported
in low probability areas could have been the result of travel through such high endemic areas.
CalMat Co. has mining operations in both Kern and San Bernardino counties. No cases
of San Joaquin Valley Fever connected with these operations have been documented, nor do we know
of any scientific evidence that points to a causal relationship between mining of sand and gravel and
this disease.
We believe no such relationship exists because even if fungal spores are present, they
are likely to exist only in the upper few inches of soil and not to the depth of the bulk of the material
o
o
Mr. Al Boughey
April 9, 1993
Page 2
G\\.
which we extract and process. Thus potentially-infective soils would represent only a very small
fraction of the total material processed.
This information as well as that provided in my AprilS, 1993 letter responds to the
issues raised in your March 25, 1993 letter. Therefore, we ask that the Cajon Creek project be
scheduled for hearing before the Common Council at its May 10, 1993 meeting.
w.~~
anag ,
Reclamation and Special Projects
DWS:bd
Enclosure
A:\SPRAGUE\IEI"Il!RSIBOUOHEY .1
.-
0"
ATTACHMENT 8 "B"
o . 0
CALMAT CAJON CREEK WINDBREAK SCHEMATIC.:
f
'"':Iot'Oo_..
~CE-FLOOO pV.1l"_
_..:../L..:.~
....~.
Windbreaks lift and slow winds while collecting dust before it goes beyond the site. Choice of
planting for windbreaks should include plants that are easily adaptable to the area, fast growing,
able to withstand high wind loads, and generally leafy evergreens. Windbreaks are constructed
by combining plantings with thick, dense foliage of various heights from ground cover to tall
trees. Our plant palette incorporates these characteristics to achieve maximum effectiveness in
moderating wind and controlling dust.
~.. ./
~"'~V'
~~
QVof09.9;;1 I' ~,~. ~o
I:fZ'\lI'PLANf SITE ~.
..:l 20.5 ~RES _~,~ \..
1--"" .' ~. ~ "
-A-.~ ~"~~
- ~
_OPeNSPACE-FL~
PlANT SITE
L~
PLANT PALElTE
SCIENTIFlCNAME: COMMON NAME:
IlIa.
Acaciabaileyana SiI....W.1lle
Acacia ..ligna Willow Acacia
Cercidium microphyllum P.1o Verde
Eucalyptus dtriodora l..emon-scented Gum
Eucalyptus sideroxylon Pink Irmbork
Fraxinus velutina Arizona Ash
Oleo eurupea European 00...
Schinus molle CaIifomia Pepper
Tall Shrubs
Ceanothus aaneatus Buckbrush
Nerium oIeender OIeonder
Photina haseri I'holinia
Prunus lyonii Calalina Cherry
Medium Shrubs
Acado constricta Desert Acado
Ceanolhus _tosus WooI1y"" Ceanothus
Mahonia aqui'o1ia Oregon grape
Low ShrubslGmund Coven
Acacia n!dolans I'roslrate W.ttle
Amostaphylis spp. Manzanila
Buugainvillea spp. Buugainvilleo
Doxantha ungus-ao Cats Claw
Raia cali/omica Rose
CeallOlhus griseus horiz. Cannel Croeper
l
,... t:l:ll t:lblc
AI1Al.tlMENT ts "C"
8':~U2~2~~OCI~TE5
Eraviro.....eo-w Cozaa~Wltl
.
r ' ';iJ3/~>t'-I5"?1
7
MEMO
'1'0 ~
Doug Sprague, eel-Mat Co.
Hans Giroux: G , A
San 30aquin Valley Fever Riak Potential at Cajon Cr.ek
April 9, 1993
FROM:
0:
DATE:
In r.sponse to public conoernB rai.ed about san Joaquin Valley
Fever risk r.lative to bpl_entation of the propos.d cajon Creek
Specific Plan, we contacted the san Bern.rcUno County Health Dept.
(Rirt 1IIery), and also perforaed .0IIIe additional technical
literature r....rch. The intent of the.. inv..tigations was to
determine the countywid. Valley Fever risk distribution, and th.n
evalua't. whether the proj.ct sib contained any enhanced or
diminished risk factors.
l San Bern.rdino coun'ty is not an ,end.mic erea for Valley rever
infection. Th. county averages 10 ca..s per y.ar. The nU1Dber of
reported ca.e. has be.n bigher the last two y.ars from a
combination of weather condition. and a reduction in the Jl....-.. of
misdiaq.nosis. There i. no data on spatial distribution. .. the
reported ca... are not aapped by Zip Code..
As to any unique soil conditions of Cajon Creek and ita
relationsbip to Valley rever, a con.iderable body of re.earch has
been performed tbrouljJhout the sOUthwe.tem U.S., u well a. in
t.atin and SOuth America, in an effort to detera1ne Why COCCicUoid_
r_idh (c. i_id~. \ the soil-borne funljJUS that can re.ult in (san
30aquin Valley pever) is pruent in certain area. and absent in
other.. While the e:ICact re.son is not clear, this re.earch has
demon.trated that a number of eC010ljJical factor. .... to be present
in hiqh end.mic c. immidi. area. that are not pre..nt in ether..
Jlany of th..e factors are in Contrast to conditions occurring at
the eal-Mat Cajon Creek 8ite, perhaps partially explaining why San
Bernardino is not a high endea1c ~ area.
/1UI.D.r hrt ~ .. ZIti, "., c:lI6rIwia fQ1U - I'I>>M (11#) 1$1"" . I'M (11#) 6S1-I6JZ
API< 09 '93 12:53 GII<OUXOSSOC1I'lTE:S
o
P.2
-2-
This body of research has indicated that C. i.midis has a tendency
to occur in distinctively arid areas which would naturally have the
characteristics of "desert .soils", often where cactus might
normally predominate. Its presence is very low in mountain regions
with heavy rainfall, and can be high in regions of poor vegetation
and little rainfall, Undisturbed portions of high .ndemlc ar.as
tend to poss.ss li tUe natural plant life, and correspondingly less
animal life. Natural veg.tation g.n.rallY consists of drouqht-
tol.rant plants and other s.mi-desert flora. SOuth.rn Arizona, for
example, is a high endemic area.
Research has shown that c. Immidis sensitivity diminiSheS as it
approaches the spur of a mountain rang., and disappears in the
highlands. This disappearance II&Y be due to c:banginq soil
condi tions as well as incr....d rainfall and associated plant
abundance in hiqher elevations. c. i_ieU. is also known to be a
very poor cOlllpeti tor of other fungi and bacteria occurril\9
naturally in the soil. Its survival is thought to be the result of
the successful adaptation of this fungus to the riqors of its arid
habitat,
It is generally believed that c. immidi. maintains a saprophytic
exist.nce in the soil (living on decaying organic matter).
R.search has shown that in high endemic c. immidis areas, 80ils
tend to be ric:b in carbonized organic material or derived frOlll
sedimentary parent ..terial. Re..arch bas also sbown that the
saline content of soils where c. iamid!. Is found In nature 1s an
important factor in it. competitiv.existance. The great tolerance
of c. i1ll1llid~. to higb concentrations of certain salts appears to
play an important part In the s.l.cti ve environlllent of this fungus.
This salt toleranoe ..y COlIlpensat. for its poor competitive
position relative to l.ss tol.rant funqi and bacteria in non-saU.ne
80US. ZVen though C. -I_idl. thrives in biCJh salinity soil within
endemic areas, its distribution within these area. is widely
scattered and spotty. Where pr..ent, it exists primarily on or
near the surface of the soil.
The U. S. Soil Conservation s.rvioe Sol1 survey of San Bernardino
county SOuthw.stern Part, California indioa~.s that soUs found at
the cal-Mat cajon creek site are of a roc:Jty, and gravelly-sand
cOlllpodUon. This is in marked contrast to soUs of the high
endemic SOuthern San Joaquin Valley (Item county) whic:b hav. an
allllOst unifonaly silty and fine sandy character. '1'op soils pre..nt
at the cajon creek sita are very limited for agricultural use,
aainly because they tend to be shallow and stony. Unllk. ..ny high
endemic c. immieU. are.., cal-Mat Cajon creek sol1s ar. granitic 1n
oriCJin, end not derived frOlll s.diaentary aated.l. Their
APR 09 '93 13:18 GIROUX~ASSOCIATES
o
P.2
::
-3-
salinity is very low because of leaching action by water flow and
their high porosity. Thus, on-site soils do not appear to share
similar characteristics with those found in high endemic areas.
Nor does this area share many other ecolO9ical characteristics
which research studies have shown to be typically presant in high
end8lllic areas. These observations lend support to the fact that
the San Bernardino area has not been identified by health officials
as a high endemic area for San Joaquin Valley Fever.
It is also possible that some of the reported cases in San
Bernardino County could have been the result of visi ta to or travel
through high endemic areas such as )tern COunty. one research study
assessed several cases of San ",oaquin Valley Fever in England,
where it is known that the c. immidia fungus spores do not exist
because of climatic conditions. Bach of these cases was cSetermined
to have been the result of travel to )tern County in Californ1a.
Finally, it is likely that even it c. immidis funtJUs spores were to
be present at an aggregate procSuction facility, they would not
represent a significant health hazard. This oonclusion is based on
the fact that Cel-Mat has indicated that they know of no incidences
of San Joaquin Valley Fever among their employees or at nearby off-
site public exposure at any of their Southern california Plants.
This may be because, if present, the fungus spores would exist only
in the upper few inches of topsoil, and not in the bulk of the
material Which would be extracted from beneath the surface. Thus,
the potential fungus-bearin; topsoil would represent only a very
small fraction of the total amount of material processed. This
topsoil is normally scraped off, stockpiled, and later reused in
revegetation. Because the fungus only lives within the first few
inches of sol1, stockpiling itself kills a large percentage of any
spores that may be present.
Based on the above informaton, we ..y conclude that San Bernardino
COunty itself is a low-risk area. We..y further conclude that the
ecoloqical factors that enhance spore viability are absent at cajon
creek. The project .ite is thus a low risk exposure area within an
already limited risk environment.
.-
o
o
::
t'!1t.1'.If1t.T CATOB CUBit PROJBCT
SPBCXFXC P~ BO. 90-01 (et al)
DYOR AND COKIlOB COtnlCXL MBBTXBG OF
Kay 10, 1993
paqe 1
ATTACHMENT 9-A
SPBCXFXC P~ BO. 90-01
COHDXTXOBS OF APPROVU.
(Revised Karch " 1993)
1. Xn the event that this approval of Specific Plan No. 90-01 or
the certification of the EIR is leqally challenqed, the city
will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and
will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once
notified, the applicant aqrees to defend, indemnity, and hold
harmless the City, its officers, aqents and employees from any
claim, action, or proceedinq aqainst the city of San
Bernardino. The applicant further aqrees to reimburse the
City of any costs and attorney's fees which the City may be
required by the court to pay as a result of such action, but
such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his
obliqation under this condition.
2. This approval and all subsequent permit (s) are subj ect to the
provisions of the Specific Plan and to all applicable
provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of
approval.
3. No public works project, tentative map or parcel map, or other
land use entitl_ent shall be approved, adopted or amended
within the area covered by the Specific Plan, unless found
consistent with the adopted Specific Plan.
4. New proposals for surface mininq activities, related land uses
or aqqreqate processinq operations not otherwise addressed in
the adopted Specific Plan (SP Bo. 90-01) or approved
Conditional Use Permit (CUP No. 91-31) shall require a
revision to the Specific Plan and a new Conditional Use
Permit.
Followinq completion of the approved Reclamation Plan and
release of Financial Assurances, any proposed mininq in
Planninq Areas F, Land M shall require a new Conditional Use
Permit. Any recommenc_ent of mininq in an area previously
mined that occurs prior to completion of the approved
Reclamation Plan for Planninq Areas F, L and M shall be
considered as part of the approvals for CUP No. 91-31.
1-
o
o
CALIO.T CAJOII CUEIt PRO.TBCT
SPECXPXC PLaII 110. 90-01 (e~ all
KAYaR AIIJ) COJlllOII C01JllCXL KEETDIG 01'
Kay 10, 1993
Page 2
Following completion of the approved Reclamation Plan and the
release of Financial Assurances, any proposed mining of
replenished aggregate in Planning Area P shall require a new
Conditional Use Permit. Any mining of replenished aggregate
within Planning Area P prior to completion of the approved
Reclamation Plan shall be considered as part of the approvals
for CUP No. 91-31.
5.
This permit or approval is
or requirements of the
Divisions:
subject to the attached conditions
following City Departments or
xx Public Works (Engineering) Department
XX Water Department
6. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the
Development Standards and Design Guidelines contained in the
Specific Plan approved by the Mayor and Common COUncil. Minor
modification to approved plans shall be subject to approval by
the Director through a minor modification permit proc_s. Any
modification which exceeds 10 t of the following allowable
measurable design/site considerations shall require the
refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing
by the appropriate hearing review authority, if applicable.
a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping:
b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures:
c. Reconfiguration of architectural features that do not'
alter or comprOJlise the previously approved theme: and,
d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development
project.
7. Prior to the issuance of any subsequent deve10paent permits,
conditional use permits or the granting of tentative
subdivision approvals, on a Planning Area by Planning Area
basis, the landowner shall file a maintenance agreement or
covenant and easeaent to enter and maintain, subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The agreement or covenant and
easement to enter and maintain shall ensure that if the
landowner, or subsequent owner(s), fail to _intain the
required/installed site improvements, the City will be able to
,
o
o
CALMAT CMOIf ClI3BE PROJECT
SPECXFXC PLaIr 1f0. 90-01 Cat al)
MAYOR .um COKKOIf C01JHCXL HBB'rDIG OP
Hay 10, 1.993
Paqe 3
'.
file an appropriate lien(s) aqainst the property in order to
accomplish the required maintenance.
8. Prior to issuance of any subsequent development permits,
conditional use permits or the qrantinq of tentative
subdivision approvals, on a project by project basis, the
developer shall submit to the Planninq Division for review
complete concept master landscape and irriqation plans for
each development project within the Specific Plan area. The
landscape and irriqation plans shall comply with the
"Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irriqation" I and
comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 19.28
(Landscaping Standards) of the Development Code effective on
the date of approval of this Specific Plan. (Note: the
issuance of a building development permit, by the Department
of Planning and Building Services, does lm% waive this
requirement. No grading permit(s) will be issued prior to
approval of landscape plans.) Trees are to be inspected by a
representative of the Parks Department prior to plantinq.
9. No lot in the Specific Plan area shall be sold unless a
corporation, assessment district or other approved appropriate
entity has been leqally formed with the right to assess all
those properties which are jointly owned or benefitted to
operate and maintain all of the mutually available features of
the development includinq, but not limited to, open space,
landscapinq or slope maintenance landscapinq (which may be on
private lots adjacent to street riqhts-of-way). No lot shall
be sold unless all approved and required open space,
landscaping, or other improvements, or approved phase thereof,
have been completed or completion is assured by a financinq
quarantee method approved by the City Enqineer.
a. Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC & R's) shall
be developed and recorded for the Specific Plan area
subj ect to the review and approval by the Department and
the City Attorney. This review and approval shall occur
prior to the issuance of any Buildinq PerlRi.ts.
b. The recorded CC & R's shall permit the enforcement by the
City. .
10. Pursuant to Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone requirements, no
structure for human occupancy shall be permitted within 50
feet of an active or potentially active fault trace. Sensitive
.-
.-
o
Q
CALDT caJON CREEl: PROJECT
SPECIPIC PLaN 110. '0-01 (et a1)
DYOR AlII) COHMON COUNCIL IlBETZIIG OP
Kay 10, 1"3
paqe 4
and hiqh occupancy structures as defined in the General Plan
shall maintain a minimum 100 foot setback.
11. No emerqency facilities, community facilities, or places of
qeneral public assemllly (not includinq open space areas) shall
be permitted within the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone.
12. A statement shall be included at the time of purchase
aqreement and at the close of escrow to the purchaser of each
lot or parcel within the Specific Plan area, which informs the
prospective owner of the potential for seismic activity, and
the potential hazards.
13. The current and/or future owner(s)/applicant(s) of any
property located in the Specific Plan area that is within 500
feet of any pipeline (_ defined by the Development Code)
shall notify a new owner(s) at the time of purchase aqreement
and at the close of escrow of the location, size, and type of
pipeline.
14. All structures subject to the provisions of the Specific Plan
shall be desiqned to aC'eOllllllodate a 100 foot setback from the
CalNev Pipeline or any other pipeline (as defined by the
Development Code). This setback may be reduced where the
Director of Planninq and Buildinq Services finds that:
a. The structure would be protected from the radiant heat of
an explosion by benlinq or other physical barriers~
b. A 100 foot setback would be impractical or unnecessary
because of existinq topoqraphy, streets, lot lines, or
easements~ and,
c. There shall be construction of a hazardous liquid
containment syste1ll or other mitiqatinq facility where the
City Enqineer finds that a leak would accumulate within
the reduced setback area. The desiqn shall be approved
by the City Enqin_r and a surety instrument shall be
approved by the City Attorney to ensure the construction
of the system.
15. The Mitiqation Monitorinq and Reporting Program Section 4.7,
Traffic and Circulation, shall be revised as follows to
incorporate two additional mitiqation measures to address the
requirement for an updated traffic study when the project's
ACTs reach 10,000:
o
o
~:I.T.Inl.T CAJOII CREEK ~
8PBCX7XC PLaN 110. to-Ol (e~ al)
DYOR AlII) COJIIlOII comrcn. DB'l'DIG or
Kay 10, 1"3
page 5
a. Projected traffic trips for each development project wi:n
be submitted by the applicant through the environmental
review process. The City will track those numbers to
determine when Specific Plan trip generation reaches
10,000 ADTs.
b. An updated traffic study to assess impacts at the X-
215/Palm Avenue and I-215/Devore Road interchanges from
the Long-Term phase development will be completed by the
applicant and revi_ed by the City prior to approval of
any parcel maps of specific development projects that
will put the proje~ trip generation over 10,000 ADTS.
16. The Specific Plan and subsequent development projects (parcel
maps, conditional use permits, development permits, etc.)
shall be subject to the appropriate measures in the adopted
Congestion Management Plan (CMP).
17. The applicant shall provide a north/south trail easement
through the open space area (Planning Area 0) of the Specific
Plan site. The general location of the trail easement shall
be determined in coordination with a community trails
committee, the City of San Bernardino and COUnty of San
Bernardino regional trails system, and may be changed from
time to time due to bioloqical, soils, public safety,
flooding, mining and reclamation, etc. conditions.
18. The applicant shall submit a High-Wind Response Plan (HWRP) to
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for
approval. A copy of the approved HWRP shall be submitted to
the Planning Division and placed in the SP No. 90-01 case
file. An on-site wind monitoring station will be used in the
preparation and implementation of the HWRP.
19. Prior to the commencement of mining, the applicant shall
conduct a minimum of two (2) qnatcatcher surveys on the
project site in accordance with California qnatcatcher survey
protOCOl. The surveys shall be conducted by a qualified
ornitholoqist.
20. Prior to the commencement of mining, the applicant shall
conduct a Los Angeles Poc:Jtet Mouse survey in Planninq Areas 0,
P, L, M and P to determine if suitable habitat is present. If
potential habitat is present, trapping studies will be
conducted to determine if the pocket mouse is present. The
surveys (and any trapping stUdies) shall be conducted in the
habitat areas by a qualified mammoloqist.
o
o
t!:I. ut:aT CMOIII CUBE PROJBCT
SPBCIFIC PLAH 11I0. 90-01 (et al)
KAYOR um COHMOIII COUBCIL MBBTXIIIG 01'
May 10, 1993
paqe 7
ATTACHMENT 9-8
COBDXTIORAL USB PBRMIT RO. U-31/UCLAMATIOIII PLAH
UV:ISBD COBDITIOIIIS OJ' APPROVUo
(Revised March 9, 1993)
1. Within one year of conditional use permit approval,
cOlDlencement of mininq and/or mininq related activities shall
have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and
void. In addition, if after ccmaencement of mininq related
activities, anyone of the surface mininq operations becomes
idle, the owner/applicant shall file an interim manaqement
plan with the City within 90 days.
Project:
Expiration Date:
conditioDal Use Permit 11I0. 91-31
One year follovinq the date of aJUlezation
approval ),y :LaJ'CO and the City
2. v_tinq of mininq and proc_sinq riqhts within the area
covered by CUP No. 91-31 (MRAs 1, 2 and 3), the implementation
of some of which may not occur for a number of years because
of a phased, sequential mininq proqram, will occur upon
initiation of work (site preparation, mininq, landscapinq,
construction for windbreaks, etc.) in anyone MRA.
3. The review authority may, upon application beinq filed 30 days
prior to the expiration date and for qood cause, qrant one
time extension not to exceed 12 lIOnths. The review authority
shall ensure that the project ccmplies with the provisions of
the CalMat Cajon creek Specific Plan (SP 90-01).
4. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP 91-31)/
Reclamation Plan by the Mayor and Common Council is continqent
upon the approval by LAFCO and the City of the City's
annexation of the Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) area.
5. within one year of the effective date of approval of
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Ro. 91-31, the applicant shall
apply for other applicable aqenc:y permits/approvals (as may be
required). The applicant shall either submit cop i_ of all
applicable aqenc:y permits or approvals or provide written
o
o
t'U.lI'&'1' ClIJOH CREBIt PRoJ'BC'l'
SPBCZI'I:C PLAN NO. 90-01 (et all
DYOR AJID COIlMOH COOHCI:L KBB'l'mG 01'
Kay 10, 1993
Page 8
::
verification that applicable agency permits or approvals have
been issued or granted.
6. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the
City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action
and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once
notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San
Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the
City of any costs and attorney's fees which the city may be
required by the court to pay as a result of such action, but
such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his
obligation under this condition.
7. The owner/applicant shall comply with all of the mitigation
measures, reporting and documentation requirements of the
approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
8. This approval and all subsequent permit(s) shall be subject to
the provisions of the CalMat cajon Creek Specific Plan (SP 90-
01) and to all applicable provisions of the Development Code
in effect at the time of approval.
9. Development permits for mining and mining related activiti_,
future tentative maps or parcel maps, or other land use
entitlements shall not be approved unless found consistent
with the adopted calMat cajon Creek Specific Plan (SP 90-01)
and more specifically, Conditional Ose Permit No. 91-
31/Reclamation Plan as it relates to !IRA 1, 2 and 3.
10. Hew proposals for surface mining activities, related land uses
and/or aggregate processing operations not otherwise addressed
in the adopted CalMat cajon Creek Specific Plan (SP 90-01) and
approved Conditional Ose Permit (COP 91-31) shall require the
filing and approval of a new Conditional Ose Permit. (Also,
refer to SP Ho. 90-01, Condition of Approval No.4.)
11. Prior to commencement of any surface mining operation or
mining related activity proposed under this Conditional Ose
Permit (COP 91-31), the owner/applicant shall submit an
application for a Development Permit for site plan review to
ensure consistency with the Specific Plan and Conditional Ose
Permit/Reclamation Plan and compliance with applicable
Planning Area Regulations and Design Guidelines and EIR
Mitigation Measures pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring' and
o
o
,.:aT.1I1I.T CJlJOB CIUmJ: PROJECT "
SPBCX7XC PLaB BO. 90-01 (.~ 81)
MAYOR DID COJOlOB COUlllCXL KBBTDrG 07
Kay 10, 1993
paq. 9
Reporting Program (refer to Condition of Approval No.5, c.'UP
No. 91-31). The Development Permit may be subject to any
additional Conditions of Approval and Standard Requir_ents of
the City, as applicable.
12.
This permit or approval is
or requir_ents of the
Divisions:
subject to the attached conditions
following City Departments or
xx Fire Department
XX Public Works (Engineering) Department
XX Water Department
13. Prior to the issuance of any development permit(s), on an HRA
by MRA basis, the landowner shall file a maintenance aqre_ent
or covenant and eas_ent to enter and maintain, subject to the
approval of the city Attorney. The aqr_ent or covenant and
_s_ent to enter and maintain shall ensure that if the
landowner, or subsequent owner(s), fail to maintain required,
installed site improv_ents (landscape buffer areas, etc.),
the City will be able to file an appropriate Hen(s) against
the property in order to accomplish the required maintenance.
14. A. aqgreqate proce..inq Pl_u: Concurrent with the
submittal of any development permit for an agqreqate
processing plant site in each HRA, the owner/applicant shall
submit cOllplete master landscape and irriqation plans (6
copies) to the Public Works Department with the required fee
for revi_. For each plant site, the landscapinq plan shall
include provisions for a visual barrier in accordance with
Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) quidelines between the aggregate
processing plant and the surroundinq land uses.
B. Aqqreqate KiDinq Opera~io_ (QUarry): Concurrent with the
submittal of any development permits for the surface mining
operations in Planninq Areas F, L and M, the owner/applicant
shall suhlllit complete master landscape and irriqation plans (6
copies) to the Public Works Department with the required fee
for revi_. For each mininq operation, the landscapinq plan
shall include provisions for a visual barrier in accordance
with Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) quidelin_ between the
surface mininq operation and the surroundinq land uses.
o
o
t!1lT.VllT CATOR CUBIt PROJBCT
SPBCXFXC PLaIT RO. 90-01 (et al)
HAYOR UD COIlHOR COmTCXL HBBTXIlG 01'
Kay 10, 1993
paqe 10
Landscape plans will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation and
Community Services and the Planning Division for review. The
landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the
"Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available
from the Parks Department), and comply with all applicable
provisions of Chapter 19.28 (Landscaping Standards) of the
Development Code effective on the date of approval of this
permit. Trees are to be inspected by a representative of the
Parks Department prior to planting. [Note: the issuance of a
building development permit, by the Department of Planning and
Building Services, does lm:t waive this requirement. No
Development permit(s) and/or grading permit(s) (as applicable)
will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans.]
15. As part of submittal requirements for Development Permits for
each of the mining operations proposed for Planning Areas F,
L, K and P, the owner/applicant shall submit plans which
graphically depict how the revegetation of each phase will
occur within a mining area (pursuant to the approved
Reclamation Plan). The plans shall be of a scale to adequately
depict the required information. The number of plans required
shall be determined by the Planning Division prior to
submittal.
16. All structures subject to the provisions of the Specific Plan
(SP No. 90-01) shall be designed to accommodate a 100 foot
setback from the CalNev Pipeline or any other pipeline [as
defined in Section 19.20.030(12) (E) of the Development Code].
This setback may be reduced where the Director of Planning and
Building Services finds that:
a. The structure would be protected from the radiant heat of
an explosion by berming or other physical barriers;
b. A 100 foot setback would be impractical or unnecessary
because of existing topography, streets, lot lines, or
easements: and,
c. There shall be construction of hazardous liquid
containment system or other miti.qating facility where the
City Engineer finds that a leak would accumulate within
the reduced setback area. The design shall be approved
by the City Engineer and a surety instrument shall be
approved by the City Attorney to ensure the construction
of the system.
.-
o
o
t!ST.....T CAJOIl CRBBK PJIOJI:C'1'
SPBCZPZC PLaIl 110. 90-01 (.~ &1)
KAYOR UD COIlHOIl COUIICZL KBBTZIlG 01'
Kay 10, 1993
paq. 11
17. The current and future owner(s)/app1icant(s) of property
located in the Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) area that is
within 500 feet of the Ca1Nev Pipeline or any other pipeline
[as defined in Section 19.20.030(12) (E) of the Development
Code) shall notify a new owner(s) at the time of purchase
aqreement and at the close of escrow of the location, size,
and type of pipeline.
18. Pursuant to Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone requir_ents, no
structure for human occupancy shall be permitted within 50
feet of an active or potentially active fault trace.
Sensi ti ve and hiqh occupancy structures as defined in the
General Plan shall maintain a minimum 100 foot setback.
19. Prior to the co_enc_ent of mininq in each Mineral Resource
Area (MRA), the surface mininq operator or land owner shall
file a bond or other financial assurance with the city
pursuant to the requirements of the SMARA. The amount of each
bond or financial assurance shall be adequate to ensure that
the City (or the state) can reclaim the mined lands, pursuant
to the approved reclamation plan. Bond or financial assurance
amounts shall be reviewed annually and, if necessary, adjusted
to reflect chanqes in the cost of reclamation (as reflected in
the Construction Cost Index or other qenerally used index),
decreased for lands reclaimed in. the previous year to the
satisfaction of the City, and increased for lands to be
disturbed in the next year. (Cbanqes to the existinq
financial assurance shall be submitted to the State for review
and then approved by the City.)
The bonds or financial assurance shall include, but not
necessarily be limited to, the costs of r_ovinq equipment and
derelict aachinery, waste materials and scraps, soil
reveqetation and landscapinq stabilization of slopes, land
restoration compatible with the topoqraphy and qeneral
environment of surroundinq property in accordance with the
approved Reclamation and Mininq Plans.
Each bond or financial assurance shall be held for a period of
five (5) years commencinq upon the completion of reclamation
for each applicable reclamation phase within tbe lIlneral
Resource Areas as specified in the Mininq Plan and the
Reveqetation Plan for COP No. 91-31.
20. The owner/applicant shall file an application with the
appropriate fees for an annual inspection pursuant to the
o
o
CJU.DT CA70N CREEK PROJECT
SPECXFXC PLAH NO. 90-01 (et all
HAYOR UD COJOroH comrCXL MEETXHG OF
May 10, 1993
page 12
::
Surface Mining And Reclamation Act (SMARA). The application
shall be accompanied by the surface mining operations report.
This application shall be submitted to Planning and Building
Services within one month of the anniversary date. The
anniversary date shall be one year from commencement of
mining.
The City shall inspect the surface mining operation(s)
pursuant to SMARA. The City may, at the applicant's cost,
contract with a state-registered geologist, state-registered
civil engineer, state-licensed landscape architect, or state-
registered forester experienced in reclamation.
The report and inspection form shall be forwarded to the
Planning- Commission for their review. The City shall forward
a copy of the report, the inspection form and any other
pertinent information (as required) to the Director of the
Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geoloqy.
21. Annually, the applicant shall submit a written report
demonstrating compliance with all of the Conditions of
Approval for CUP No. 91-31 and with the Mitigation Measures
outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program,
as applicable to the CUP. This shall be completed in
conjunction with the actions required by Condition of Approval
No. 19
22. Reclamation shall be in substantial conformance with the
approved reclamation plan as described in the text of the
calMat cajon Creek Conditional 0_ Permit/ReClamation Plan
application dDCUlllent and with the plans required by Condition
of Approval No. 14 (CUP No. 91-31).
23. A permit may be required from the San Bernardino County Flood
Control District for any encroaclment onto Flood Control
District right-Of-way, and a mini.JInm of six (6) weeks
processing time should be allowed for permit processing.
24. All active mining ar_s within the CalMat Cajon Creek Specific
Plan (SP 90-01) area shall be posted with "No Trespassing"
siqns placed no further than 100 feet apart. Said "No
Trespassing" signs shall be approved by the Director of
Planning and Buildinq Services and be maintained to the
completion of the surface mininq operation and reclamation.
o
o
t!Jlunt.T CATOH CUBit PROJECT
SPECIPIC PLaN RO. 90-01 (et &1)
DYOR um COJIMOH COtlRCIL IIBETIHG 01'
Hay 10, 1993
page 13
25. Six (6) foot high fences shall be erected around the perimeter
of active aggregate mining operations (in Planning Areas F, L
and H), processing plant sites and related mining activities
as required by the applicable Planning Area Regulations in the
Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) and with the addition of an
angled barbed wire extension as approved by the Director of
Planning and Building Services with a Development Permit (Type
I). The fences shall be maintained at all times until such
operations cease or are completed.
26. Hining operations shall comply with the safety requirements of
EHA, OSHA, the State Division of Industrial Safety and
California Hine Safety Orders.
27. Extraction activities and aggregate processing may occur
anytime between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., Honday through
Saturday; however, extraction activities shall not exceed a
total of 12 hours per day. An allowable exception to these
hours would be operations in response to an emergency to
protect life or property ,or in response to the requirements
of government or government agencies beyond the control of the
operator.
Maintenance activities may be conducted at anytime.
28. Ho mining or processing operations shall be conducted on
Sundays or holidays, although maintenance activities may occur
at any time (see previous Condition).
29. At no time shall there be any blasting, dynamiting or use of
explosives of any kind whatsoever on the premises.
30. No open burning on the premises shall occur at any time.
31. The owner/applicant shall install one monitoring well in
Planning Area F and one monitoring well in either Planning
Area L or Planning Area H. The owner/applicant shall use the
wells to conduct periodic testing for water quality to ensure
that the groundwater is not affected by the mining operations
and to ensure that mining operations stay above the
groundwater level.
32. When average hourly wind speeds equal or exceed 25 mph,
surface mining and processing operations shall be conducted in
accordance with the High Wind Response Plan (HWRP) (refer to
Condition of Approval No. 18, SP No. 90-01). A minimum of two
o
o
CALDT CATO. CRBBJ: PIIIOJI:CT::
SPBCZJ'ZC PLUr BO. 90-01 (et &1)
KAYOR um COJOlO. C01lJlCZL 1IBft:mG OJ'
by 10, 1993
Page 14
(2) anemometers shall be installed in the excavation and
processing plant areas (one each) to monitor and determine
wind speeds. In addition, the results of the wind speed
monitoring shall be submitted with the annual report to the
Planning and Building Services Department (refer to Condition
of Approval Nos. 20 and 21).
33. The owner/applicant or operator shall comply with the
requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) air quality permits, which must be secured
prior to commencement of mining or processing activities.
(Also, refer to COndition of Approval NO.5.)
34. Prior to commencement of mining, the applicant shall submit a
rock truck routing plan to the Planning Division and Public
Works Department for review and approval. The plan also shall
be reviewed by affected agencies such as San Bernardino City
Unified School District and County of San Bernardino Regional
Parks DePlirtment. The rock truck routing plan shall ensure
that rock trucks traveling to and from the site (except for
those making local deliveries) shall not use the Devore Bridge
until a safe alternative equestrian crossing (as determined by
the City Engineer and the Director of Planning and Building
services) is found for I-215 from the Devore area.
35. The applicant shall leave a portion of the grove that is
located in the cajon creek area north of Institution Road to
serve as a buffer zone for the upstream mining operation in
Planning Area P.
36. Upon submittal of a Development Permit for mining in Planning
Area P, the applicant shall submit the required enqineerinq
and hydroloqy studies. The scope of the studies shall be
expanded to include areas upstream and downstream from the
mininq operation so that the exact nature of streambed
stabilization can be determined.
37. On a yearly basis, the applicant shall monitor the stream for
upstream erosion (headcuttinq) which may result from mininq
activities in Planninq Area P. The results of the monitorinq
shall be submitted to the Cit,y as'part of the annual reportinq
for the compliance with MMRP and Conditions of Approval. If
upstream erosion (headcuttinq) is found, the applicant shall
take corrective actions as may be required by the City and/or
the San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
.-
o
o
t!1l.T.V1lT caJOIIT CUBit PROJBCT
SPBCXP%C PLa1f lITO. 90-01 (e~ al)
HAYOR lI1fI) COIDlOIIT COUlfCXL DUmG OJ'
Kay 10, 1993
Paqe 15
ATTACHMENT 9-C
TB1fTATXVB PAltCBL HAP lITO. 14106
ItBVI:SBD COIfDXTXOIITS OJ' UP1IOVU.
(Revised Karch 9, 1993)
1. Within two years of annexation approval by IAFCO and the City,
the filinq of the final map or parcel map with the Council
shall have occurred or the approval shall become null and
void. Expiration of a tentative map shall terminate all
proceedinqs and no final map or parcel map shall be filed
without first processinq a new tentative map. The city
Enqineer must accept the final map or parcel map documents as
adequate for approval by Council prior to forwardinq them to
the City Clerk. The date the map shall be deemed filed with
the Council is the date on which the City Clerk receives the
map. The review authority may, upon application filed 30 days
prior to the expiration date and for qood cause, qrant an
extension to the expiration date pursuant to Section 19.66.170
of the Development Code and the State Map Act.
Project:
Expiration Date:
Parcel Map lITo. 1.106
Two years fras the cSa~e of lUID_a~ioD
approval by r.a:rco _d the city
2. The approval of Tentative Parcel Map 14106 by the Mayor and
Common Council is continqent upon the approval by LAFCO and
the city of the City'S annexation of the Specific Plan (SP No.
90-01) area.
3. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the
plan e s) approved by the Mayor and COIIIIIOn Council. Minor
modification to the planes) shall be subject to approval by
the Director throuqh a minor modification permit process. Any
modification which exceeds 10 % of the followinq allowable
measurable desiqn/site considerations shall require the
refilinq of the oriqinal application and a subsequent hearinq
by the appropriate hearinq review authority, if applicab1e.
4. In the event that this approval is leqally challenqed, the
City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or acti.gn
and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. once
notified, the applicant aqrees to defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its officers, aqents and employees from any
o
o
CJ.T.IIllT CJlJOR CllBBE PROJBCT
SPBCXFXC PLaR RO. '0-01 (et a1)
KAYOR AJIlD COIlKOR COURCXL IIBftXRG OF
Kay 10, 19 93
paqe 16
claim, action, or proceedinq aqainst the City of San
Bernardino. The applicant further aqrees to reimburse the
City of any costs and attorney's fees which the city may be
required by the court to pay as a result of such action, but
such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his
obliqation under this condition.
5. This approval and all subsequent permit(s) for development
within the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14106 are subject to
the provisions of the Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) and to all
applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the
time of approval. This requirement is inclusive of any
applicable Land Use District Development Standards
(Development Code Section 19.08.030) for industrial
development reqardinq minimum lot area, minimum setbacks,
maximum heiqht, maximum lot coveraqe, etc.
6.
This permit or approval is
or requirements of the
Divisions:
subject to the attached conditions
followinq City Departments or
xx Public Works (Enqineerinq) Department
xx Water Department
7. No public works project, tentative map or parcel map, or other
land use entitlement shall be approved, adopted or amended
within the area covered by the Specific Plan, unless found
consistent with the adopted Specific Plan.
8. The owner/applicant shall comply with all of the mitiqation
measures,. reportinq and documentation requirements of the
approved Hitiqation Monitorinq and Reportinq Proqram.
9. Prior to the issuance of a Buildinq Permit, the landowner
shall file a maintenance aqreement or covenant and easement to
enter and maintain, subject to the approval of the City
Attorney. The aqreement or covenant and easement to enter and
maintain shall ensure that if the landowner, or subsequent
owner(s), fail to maintain the required/installed site
improvements (includinq but not limited to landscapinq,
ir.riqation and hardscape), the City will be able to file an
appropriate lien(s) aqainst the property in order to
accomplish the required maintenance.
o
o
.'
..... UI1l.T CAJOIf CRBEK PROJBCT
SPBCXPXC PLaII 110. 90-01 (et a1)
DYOR UID COJIHOIf comrCXL lIBBTXlfG OP
Kay 10, 1993
Paqe 17
10. Prior to issuance of qradinq or buildinq permits, the
developer shall submit to the Planninq Division for review
complete a concept master landscape and irriqation plan for
each development (as development occurs for non-minq uses)
within the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14106. The landscape
and irriqation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and
Policy for Landscape and Irriqation", and comply with all
applicable provisions of Chapter 19.28 (Landscapinq Standards)
of the Development Code in effect on the date of approval of
this Tentative Subdivision. (Note: the issuance of a buildinq
development permit, by the Department of Planninq and Buildinq
Services, does um: waive this requirement. No qradinq
permit(s) will be issued prior to approval of landscape
plans. ) Trees are to be inspected by a representative of the
Parks Department prior to plantinq.
11. A Composite Development Plan (ooP) shall be filed with the
Public Works and Planninq and Buildinq Services Departments
prior to Final or Parcel Map processinq by the City. The COP
shall provide additional survey and map information includinq,
but not limited to buildinq criteria (i.e. setbacks), flood
control criteria, seismic and qeoloqical criteria,
environmental criteria and easements of record. The COP shall
be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan" and
contain a section entitled "COP Notes". The applicant shall
have listed under the COP Notes section the conditions for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 14106, mitiqation measures required
for the development of the subject property as listed in the
Mitiqation MonitorinqjReportinq Proqram and all applicable
Specific Plan provisions.
12. No lot in the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14106 area shall be
sold unless a corporation, assessment district or other
approved appropriate entity has been leqally formed with the
right to assess all those properties which are jointly owned
or benefitted to operate and maintain all of the mutually
available features of the development includinq, but not
limited to, open space, landscapinq or slope maintenance
landscaping (which may be on private lots adjacent to street
rights-of-way). No lot shall be sold unless all approved and
required open space, landscaping, or other improvements, or
approved phase thereof, have been completed or completion is
assured by a financinq quarantee method approved by the City
Engineer.
..-
o
o
CALllAT CMOJf CRBBlt PROJZC'l'
SPBCZPZC PLAH JfO. '0-01 (e~ all
KAYOR AJfD COJDlOJf comrCZL JlBBTDtG OP
May 10, 1"3
Page 18
a. Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC & R's) shall
be developed and recorded for the lots included in Parcel
Map No. 14106 subject to the review and approval by the
Department and the city Attorney. This review and
approval shall occur prior to the issuance of any
Building Permits.
b. The recorded CC & R' s shall permit the enforcement by the
city.
13. No structure for human occupancy shall be permitted within 50
feet of an active or potentially active fault trace.
Sensitive and high occupancy structures as defined in the
General Plan shall maintain a minimum 100 foot setback.
14. No emerqency facilities, community facilities, or places of
general public assembly (not including open space areas) shall
be permitted within the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone.
15. A statement shall be included at the time of purchase
aqreement and at the close of escrow to the purchaser of each
lot within the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14106, which
informs the prospective owner of the potential for seismic
activity, and the potential hazards.
16. The current and/or future owner(s)/applicant(s) of any
property located in the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14106
that is within 500 feet of the CalNev Pipeline and any other
pipeline (as defined by the Development Code) shall notify a
new owner(s) at the time of purchase aqreement and at the
close of escrow of the location, size, and type of pipeline.
17. All structures located within the boundaries of Parcel Map No.
14106 and subject to the provisions of the Specific Plan (SP
No. 90-01) shall be desiqned to accommodate a 100 foot setback
from the CaINev Pipeline and any other pipeline (as defined by
:the Development Code). This setback may be reduced where the
Director of Planning and Building Services finds that:
a. The structure would be protected from the radiant heat of
an explosion by berming or other physical barriers;
b. A 100 foot setback would be impractical or unnecessary
because of existing topoqraphy, streets, lot lines, or
easements; and,
o
o
t!1T.1l1l.T CJlJOIll CREEK PROJECT
SPECX~XC PLaIIl Il1O. 90-01 (et &1)
HAYOR AIIlD COHMOIIl COOlllCXL MEETIIIlG O~
Kay 10, 1993
paqe 19
c. There shall be construction of a hazardous liquid
containment system or other mitiqatinq facility where the
City Enqineer finds that a leak would accumulate within
the reduced setback area. The desiqn shall be approved
by the City Enqineer and a surety instrument shall be
approved by the City Attorney to ensure the construction
of the syst_.
-
--~.",",
,
I
o
o
CALMAT CAJON CREElt PROJECT
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-01 (et al)
DYOR AKD CODON COUNCIL MEETING OF
Hay 10, 1993
Page 20
AT'l'ACHMENT 9-0
'.rDl'.rATrvE PAJlCBL HAP BO. 14107
REVl:SED COKDn'IONS OF APPROVAL
(Revised Karch 9, 1993)
1. Within two years of annexation approval by LAFCO and the city,
the filing of the final map or parcel map with the Council
shall have occurred or the approval shall become null and
void. Expiration of a tentative map shall terminate all
proceedings and no final _p or parcel map shall be filed
without first processing a new tentative map. The City
Engineer must accept the final map or parcel map documents as
adequate for approval by Council prior to forwarding th_ to
the City Clerk. The date the map shall be deemed filed with
the Council is the date on which the city Clerk receives the
map. The review authority may, upon application filed 30 days
prior to the expiration date and for good cause, grant an
extension to the expiration date pursuant to Section 19.66.170
of the Development Code and the State Map Act.
Project:
Expiration Date:
Parcel Hap Bo. 14107
'fWo years froa the date of &DIlezatioD
approval by UFCO and the ci ~
2. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the
planCs) approved by the Mayor and Common Council. Minor
modification to the planCs) shall be subject to approval by
the Director through a minor modification permit process. Any
modification which exceeds 10 t of the following allowable
measurable design/site considerations shall require the
refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing
by the appropriate hearing review authority, if applicable.
3. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the
City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action
and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once
notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its officers, agents and _ployees from any
claim, action, or proceeding against the city of San
Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the
City of any costs and attorney's fees which the City may be
required by the court to pay as a result of such action, but
o
o
CALI'...A'1' caJOH CRBBlt PROJZC'I'
SPECZPZC PLUI HO. '0-01 (at all
KAYOR MID COMKOH COmTCZL JlEE'l'DlG OF
Kay 10, 1"3
page 21
::
such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his
Obligation under this condition.
4. This approval and all subsequent permit(s) for development
within the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14107 are subject to
the provisions of the Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) and to all
applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the
time of approval. This requirement is inclusive of any
applicable Land Use District Development Standards
(Development Code Section 19.08.030) for industrial
development regarding minimum lot area, minimum setbacks,
maximum height, maximum lot coverage, etc.
5. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions
or requirements of the following City Departments or
Divisions:
xx Public Works (Engineering) Department
XX Water Department
6. Ho public works project, tentative map or parcel map, or other
land use entitlement shall be approved, adopted or amended
within the area covered by the Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01),
unless found consistent with the adopted Specific Plan.
7. The owner/applicant shall comply with all of the mitigation
measures, reporting and documentation requirements of the
approved Hitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
8. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the landowner
shall file a maintenance agreement or covenant and easement to
enter and maintain, subject to the approval of the City
Attorney. The agreement or covenant and easement to enter and
maintain shall ensure that if the landowner, or subsequent
owner(s), fail to maintain the required/installed site
improvements (including but not limited to landscaping,
irrigation and hardscape), the City will be able to file an
appropriate lien(s) against the property in order to
accomplish the required maintenance.
9. Prior to issuance of grading or building peraits, the
developer shall submit to the Planning Division for review
complete a concept master landscape and irrigation plan for
each development (as development occurs for non-ming uses)
within the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14107. The landscape
o
o
CALDT caJOIJ CREEK PIlOJBC'l'
SPBC%PXC PLUI 110. '0-01 (at &1)
DYOR AJI1D COIllCOIJ COmrCrL JlBBTmG OP
May 10, 1"3
paqa 22
and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and
Policy for Landscape and Irrigation", and comply with all
applicable provisions of Chapter 19.28 (Landscaping Standards)
of the Development Code in effect on the date of approval of
this Tentative Subdivision. (Note: the issuance of a building
development permit, by the Department of Planning and Building
Services, does J!al waive this requirement. No grading
permit(s) will be issued prior to approval of landscape
plans.) Trees are to be inspected by a representative of the
Parks Department prior to "plant.1ng.
10. A Composite Development Plan (COP) shall be filed with the
Public Works and Planning and Building Services Departments
prior to Final or Parcel Map processing by the city. The CDP
shall provide additional survey and map information including,
but not limited to building criteria (Le. setbacks), flood
control criteria, seismic and geological criteria,
environmental criteria and easements of record. The COP shall
be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan" and
contain a section entitled "COP Notes". The applicant shall
have listed under the COP Notes section the conditions for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 14107, mitigation measures required
for the development of the subject property as listed in the
Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting ~"",ram and all applicable
Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) provisions.
11. No lot in the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14107 area shall be
sold unless a corporation, assessment district or other
approved appropriate entity has been legally formed with the
right to assess all those properties which are jointly owned
or benefitted to operate and maintain all of the mutually
available features of the development including, but not
limited to, open space, landscaping or slope maintenance
landscaping (which may be on private lots adjacent to street
rights-of-way). No lot shall be sold unless all approved and
required open space, landscaping, or other improvements, or
approved phase thereof, have been completed or completion is
assured by a financing guarant_ llethod approved by the city
Engineer.
a. Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC , R's) shall
be developed and recorded for the lots included in Parcel
Map No. 14107 subject to the review and approval by the
Department and the City Attorney. This review and
approval shall occur prior to the issuance of any
Building Permits.
o
o
caLMAT CJlJOII' CUBit PROJBCT
SPBCZPIC PLAIl' 11'0. 90-01 (at all
DYOR UID COIlKOII' comrCZL lIBBTZIl'G 01'
Hay 10, 1993
Page 23
b. The recorded CC & R's shall permit the enforcement by the
city.
12. No structure for human occupancy shall be permitted within 50
feet of an active or potentially active fault trace.
Sensitive and high occupancy structures as defined in the
General Plan shall maintain a minimum 100 foot setback.
13. No emergency facilities, community facilities, or places of
general pub1ic assemb1y (not including open space areas) shall
be permitted within the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone.
14. A statement shall be included at the time of purchase
agreement and at the close of escrav to the purchaser of each
lot within the boundaries of Parcel Hap No. 14107, which
informs the prospective owner of the potential for sei_ic
activity, and the potential hazards.
15. The current and/or future owner(s)/applicant{sJ of any
property located in the boundaries of Parcel Hap No. 14107
that is within 500 feet of the CaINev Pipeline and any other
pipeline (as defined by the Developaant Code) shall notify a
new owner{s) at the time of purchase agreement and at the
close of escrow of the location, size, and type of pipeline.
16. All structures located within the boundaries of Parcel Hap
14107 and subject to the provisions of the Specific Plan (SP
No. 90-01) shall be designed to accomaodate a 100 foot setback
from the CalNev Pipeline and any other pipeline (as defined by
the Development Code). This setback may be reduced where the
Director of Planning and Building services finds that:
a. The structure would be protected from the radiant heat of
an explosion by berming or other physical barriers:
b. A 100 foot setback would be !.practical or unnecessary
because of existing topography, streets, 10t 1ines, or
easements: and,
c. There shall be construction of hazardous liquid
containment system or other mitigating facility where tbe
city Engineer finds that a leak would accumulate within
tbe reduced setback area. The design shall be approved
by the City Engineer and a surety instrument shall be
approved by the City Attorney to ensure the construction
of the system.
o
o
,
t':aT.II1l.'1' CAJOH CREBK PROJECT
SPBCX~XC PLaH HO. 90-01 (.~ a1)
DYOR AND COIlKOH COUHCXL IIBB'1'XHG O~
Hay 10, 1993
paq. 24
17. The approval of Tentative Parcel Hap 14107 by the Mayor and
Common Council is continqent upon the approval by LAFCO and
the City of the City's annexation of the Specific Plan (SP No.
90-01) area.
.-
o
o
t!1I. T.1111.~ C&JOB CREEK PROJBC'1'
SPBCXPXC PLaB BO. 90-01 (et al)
MAYOR AlII) COJIMO. C01JBCXL MBE~XNG OP
Illly 10, 1993
pa'1e 25
ATTACHMENT 9-E
TDr.rATXVE PARCEL MAP BO. 1410.
UVI:SED COBDXTXOBS OP APPROVU.
(Revised March 9, 1993)
1. Within two years of annexation approval by LAFCO and the City,
the filin'1 of the final map or parcel _p with the Council
shall have occurred or the approval $bAll becOllle null and
void. Expiration of a tentative _p shall terminate all
proceedinqs and no final map or parcel map shall be filed
without first processin'1 a n_ tentative map. The City
En'1ineer IlUSt accept the final map or parcel map documents as
adequate for approval by Council prior to forwardin'1 them to
the City Clerk. The date the map shall be deemed filed with
the Council is the date on which the City Clerk receives the
map. The revi_ authority may, upon application filed 30 days
prior to the expiration date and for '1ood cause, qrant an
extension to the expiration date pursuant to Section 19.66.170
of the Development Code and the State Hap Act.
Project:
Expiration Date:
parael Illlp Bo. 1.10.
Two year. froa the date of aDD_atioD
approval J:Iy LaPCO &D4 the city
2. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the
planes) approved by the Mayor and Common Council. Minor
modification to the planes) shall be subject to approval by
the Director throu'1h a minor modification permit process. Any
modification which exceeds 10 t of the followin'1 allowable
measurable desiqn/site considerations shall require the
refilin'1 of the original application and a subsequent hearing
by the appropriate hearing revi_ authority, if applicable.
3. Xn the event that this approval is leqally challenged, the
City will prOlllptly notify the applicant of any claim or action
and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once
notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees frOlll any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San
Bernardino. The applicant further aqrees to reimburse the
city of any costs and attorney's fees which the City may be
required by the court to pay as a result of such action, but
o
o
c:aLKl.T caJOB CRBBE PROJECT
SPBCD'ZC PLD BO. 1I0-01 (et a1)
KAYOR UD COMllOB COUBCZL JlBBTZBG OF
Kay 10, 1l1l13
paq. 26
such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his
obliqation under this condition.
4. This approval and all subsequent permit(s) for development
within the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14108 are subject to
the provisions of the Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01) and to all
applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the
time of approval. This requir_ent is inclusive of any
applicable Land Use District Development Standards
(Development Code Section 19.08.030) for industrial
development reqardinq minimum lot area, minimum setbacks,
maximum heiqbt, maximum lot coveraqe, etc.
5. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions
or requir_ents of the followinq City Departments or
Divisions:
xx Public Works (Enqineerinq) Department
XX Water Department
6. No public works project, tentative map or parcel map, or other
land use entitl_ent shall be approved, adopted or amended
within the area covered by the Specific Plan (SP No. 90-01),
unless found consistent with the adopted Specific Plan.
7. The owner/applicant sball comply with all of the mitiqation
measures, reportinq and documentation requir_ents of the
approved Mitiqation Monitorinq and Reportinq Proqram.
8. Prior to the issuance of a Buil~inq Permit, the landowner
shall file a maintenance aqreement or covenant and easement to
enter and maintain, subject to the approval of the City
Attorney. Tbe aqre_ent or covenant and eas_ent to enter and
maintain shall ensure that if the landowner, or subsequent
owner(s) , fail to maintain the required/installed site
improv_ents (includinq but not limited to landscapinq,
irriqation and hardscape), the City will be able to file an
appropriate lien(s) aqainst the property in order to
accomplisb the required maintenance.
9. Prior to issuance of qradinq or buildinq permits, the
developer shall submit to the Planninq Division for review
complete a concept master landscape and irriqation plan for
each development (as development occurs for non-minq uses)
within the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14108. Tbe landscape
o
o
~:u.1I1t.T caJOB CllBBlt PROJBC'l'
8PBCZFZC PLaB BO. 90-01 (et &1)
DYOR ABD CODOB COmrCZL IIBB'lmG OF
Kay 10, 1993
paqe 27
and irriqation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and
Policy for Landscape and Irriqation" , and comply with all
applicable provisions of Chapter 19.28 (Landscapinq Standards)
of the Development Code in effect on the date of approval of
this Tentative Subdivision. (Note: the issuance of a Duildinq
development permit, Dy the Department of Planninq and Buildinq
Services, does Bm: waive this requirsment. No qradinq
permit(s) will De issued prior to approval of landscape
plans.) Trees are to De inspected DY a representative of the
Parks Department prior to plantinq.
10. A Composite Development Plan (CDP) shall De filed with the
PuDlic Works and Planninq and Buildinq services Departments
prior to Final or Parcel Map processinq DY the City. The COP
shall provide additional survey and map information includinq,
Dut not limited to Duildinq criteria (i.e. setDacks), flood
control criteria, seismic and qeoloqical criteria,
environmental criteria and eassments of record. The COP shall
De labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan" and
contain a section entitled "CDP Notes". The applicant shall
have listed under the COP Notes section the conditions for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 14108, mitiqation measures required
for the development of the suDject property as listed in the
Mitiqation Monitorinq/bportinq Proqram and all applicable
Specific Plan provisions.
11. No lot in the Doundaries of Parcel Map No. 14108 area shall De
sold unless a corporation, assessment district or other
approved appropriate entity has Deen leqally formed with the
riqht to assess all those properties which are jointly owned
or Denefitted to operate and maintain all of the mutually
available features of the development includinq, Dut not
limited to, open space, landscapinq or slope maintenance
landscapinq (which may De on private lots adjacent to street
riqhts-of-way). No lot shall be sold unless all approved and
required open space, landscapinq, or other improvsments, or
approved phase thereof, have Deen completed or completion is
assured Dy a financinq quarantee _thod approved Dy the City
Enqineer.
a. Conditions, covenants, and Restrictions (CC ~ R's) shall
be developed and recorded for the lots included in Parcel
Map No. 14108 subject to the revi_ and approval Dy the
Department and the City Attorney. This review and
approval shall occur prior to the issuance of any
Buildinq Permits.
o
o
.
car.DT CMOIl' CRBIlJt PROJECT
SPECZPZC PLaIl' BO. '0-01 (et a1)
DYOR AlII) COJUIOIl' C01DlCZL IIBB'1'ZIl'G OP
Hay 10, 1"3
paqe 28
b. The recorded CC & R's shall permit the enforcement by the
city.
12. No structure for human occupancy shall tie permitted within so
feet of an active or potentially active fault trace.
Sensitive and hiqh occupancy structures as defined in the
General Plan shall maintain a minimum 100 foot setback.
13. No emerqency facilities, community facilities, or places of
qeneral public assembly Cnot includinq open space areas) shall
be permitted within the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone.
14. A statement shall be included at the time of purchase
aqreement and at the close of escrow to the purchaser of each
lot within the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14108, which
informs the prospective owner of the potential for seismic
activity, and the potential hazards.
15. The current and/or future ownerCs)/applicantCs) of any
property located in the boundaries of Parcel Map No. 14108
that is within 500 feet of the calNev Pipeline and any other
pipeline Cas defined by the Development Code) shall notify a
new ownerCs) at the time of purchase aqreement and at the
close of escrow of the location, size, and type of pipeline.
16. All structures located within the boundaries of Parcel Map
14108 and subject to the provisions of the Specific Plan CSP
No. 90-01) shall be desiqned to accommodate a 100 foot setback
from the CalNev Pipeline and any' other pipeline Cas defined by
the Development Code). This setback may tie reduced where the
Director of Planninq and Buildinq Services finds that:
a. The structure would tie protected from the radiant heat of
an explosion by tlerminq or other physical barriers;
b. A 100 foot setback would be impractical or unnecessary
because of existinq topoqraphy, streets, lot lines, or
easements; and,
c. There shall tie construction of hazardous liquid
containment system or other mitiqatinq facility where the
City Enqineer finds that a leak would accumulate within
the reduced setback area. The desiqn shall be approved
by the City Enqin_r and a surety instrument shall tie
approved by the city Attorney to ensure the construction
of the system.
.-
-
..
'"
17.
,~-
o
o
t!21T.1f2l.T CAJON CUBit PROJECT
SHCII'IC PLUI BO. '0-01 (et al)
DYOR um COJlllON COmrCIL IIBBTIHG 01'
Kay 10, 19'3
paqe 2t
The approval of Tentative Parcel Map 14108 by the Mayor and
COJDlllon Council is continqent upon the approval by LAFCO and
the City of the city's annexation of the Specific Plan (SP No.
90-01) area.
. -
. . I
'"
City of San Bernardino
Department of Planning and Building Services
FROM:
Mayor and Members of the city Council
Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building
Services
TO:
SUBJECT:
Transcript of Planning Commission Meeting of
February 16, 1993 - Cal-Mat Project
DATE:
May 7, 1993
City Administrator, city Clerk, City Attorney
COPIES:
Attached is a transcript of the public hearing of the Planning
Commission of February 16, 1993 on the Cal-Mat Project. This
transcript has been provided in the event that you wish to review
a more detailed account of the meeting. Minutes of the meeting
have also been provided for your review.
~ ~,
~,.,
w
-',
~ .:
-<
I
-...J
;3
--
~ C-.;
~
-fI'iT
Transcript of City of San Bernardino
Planning commission Meeting of February 16, 1993
Specific Plan No. 90-01, General Plan Amendment No. 91-18,
Development Code Amendment No. 92-06,
Conditional Use Permit No. 91-31jReclamation Plan,
Tentative Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107, and 14108
(Cal-Mat Proiect)
.-
\ . '
.
-..
.
f
.<
',"
TAPE ORE 1 SIDE 1
MR. Al Boughey: Good evening I Chairman's, members of the Planning
Commission. Assigned before you before tonight as the applicant
of the Calmat Company request approval of specific plan number
90-01, which proposes to establish land use districts permitted
usage of development standards and design guidelines for the
Calmat Cajon Creek project. Specific plan, and related applica-
tions would provide for the establishment of mineral extractive,
heavy industrial, light industrial, open space usages with mining
related inner usages on the site. The project is phased with
ultimate build out anticipated at twenty-five (25) years for
light and heavy industrial uses. Other project applications
include General Plan amendment number 91-18 and development code
amendment 92-06, conditional use permit 91-31, reclamation plan
and tentative parcel map numbers 14106, 14107, 14108. Also the
project consist of one thousand three hundred and ninety-two
acres of land located on the West side of the Cajon Blvd.,
generally between Devore and the unincorporated community of
Muscoy. Ah - While planning.... This item has been continued and
was re-noticed for this evening, ah, from the June 16, 1992,
planning commission meeting. At that meeting it was indicated
that the Calmat EIR may require further and independent review
with regard to certain environmental topics, in accordance with
the assembly bill 1642. Based on the concerns raised by the City
Attorneys Office and public testimony taken at that meeting,
staff identified four (4) environmental topics within the EIR
which required further examination. It included hydrology, air
quality, biology, and aesthetics. After that meeting, a tabling
the department completed a request for proposed qualifications, a
request for proposal, and qualifications, and an interview
process and selected MEG Associates to complete the independent
review on behalf of this city. MEG Associates it serves in
associate with John Minch Associates in Certified Earth Metrics.
Our consultant team qualified to review those environmental
items.
We are here tonight to ah forward planning commissions recommen-
dation to council on this specific plan and the other actions
I've previously outlined. I just want to remind the commission
that tonight you do not take final action, that will be taken by
council and your responsibility is to forward a recommendation to
council. Ah, at this point I would like to just quickly introduce
the consulting team that the city retained to provide additional
input. We have Marie Gillian, MEG Associates, who is a member of
the American Institute of Certified Planners, who headed up the
consulting team. We have John A. Minch, Mr. Minch is a Ph.D, is a
Geologist, and a principal in John Minch Associates. He has
conducted and written several hundred EIR's remediation and
resource guides involving biological, geological surveys in
California. Also as part of the consultant team, we have Mr.
Thomas Leslie. Mr. Leslie is a qualified environmental consul-
Page 1
~
tanto He has multi-disciplinary expertise in the areas of re-
search management, wetland ecology, (404, 1601, 1603) regulatory
work sensitive habitat, etc. in the area, biological resources.
Ah, and Mr. Michael Hogan. Mr. Hogan is a Air Quality Physicist
who is retained to provide his expertise in the area of air
quality as project inner-review of the EIR. Have I left anyone
out? Okay!
At this point I would like to introduce the applicant, Mr. Doug
Sprague who is Manager Reclamation and Special Projects for the
Calmat Corporation. We have asked Mr. Sprague to provide a brief
summary of the project to ah the Planning Commission.
Mr. Doug Sprague: Good evening Mr. Chairman and members of the
Commission. I'm Doug Sprague, Project Manager for the Calmat
Cajon Creek project. My address is, 3200 San Fernando Road, in
Los Angeles. I noticed in the audience that we have a lot of
support and I would just like those that in support of the Calmat
Cajon Creek project just to stand up for a moment, if you would
please. I want to thank you all for coming out and supporting
this project. Thank you! Before I begin, do you all have a copy
of our project information binder? It looks like this! Has
everybody received a copy. I'm going to read my presentation
tonight because there are so many issues to cover and I don't
want to leave anything out. I've been looking forward to this
evening since I began the project back in 1985. The project
documents you have before you tonight are quite voluminous. They
are the result of eight years of planning, with city staff in-
put, public in-put, extensive review of the EIR by city staff, by
the public, and by an independent peer review consulting team,
and in-put from local communities and the project area. The
result of this planning an in-put is a specific plan that is
responsive not only to environmental issues but community con-
cerns and issues as well. Before I continue further, let me state
that Calmat is in agreement with staff recommendations. It should
also be noted that there are several areas needing clarification
which we have outlined in a letter to the city. Our specific plan
90-01 is very detailed in covering all aspects of our mining
operations and development project, Calmat prefers this. Thus,
everyone knows in advance what will be done and how it will be
carried out. In fact this specificity is your guarantee that we
will perform. If we do not, our permit maybe revoked. We will not
take that chance. Calmat will be a corporate neighbor in this
community for many years. We understand the importance of keeping
our word and commitments to the community. Calmat has a proven
track record of keeping its commitments. The City of San Diego
found us out when we proposed our Mission Valley Project. At that
the project area was a trash and junk filled swamp. To see what
it is today.....
UDideD~ified Speaker: Mr. Sprague, could you excuse me for one
minute please.
Page 2
~
.
.
,
,
,
~.
Mr. Sprague: Surel
Unidentified Speaker: I am going to ask those people that are
standing, they are going to have to go out into the lobby, except
for a single line here and a single line over here on this side.
That is a request from the Fire Marshal. We are going to have to
ask just one line on this side and one line of people on this
side over here. There is a speaker out in the lobby and you will
be able to everything out in the lobby. Go ahead Mr. Sprague,
maybe you will want to hold off until they......
Mr. Sprague: I'll just wait.
Unidentified speaker: If you can bear one second Mr. Chairman, if
you can bear with us and make sure that we have the speaker
working in the lobby.
Mr. Sprague: Shall we continue? Calmat has a proven track record
of keeping its commitments. The City of San Diego found us out
when we proposed our Mission Valley Project. At that time the
project area was a trash and junk filled swamp. To see what it is
today, you might want to turn to the Mission Valley section in
your information binder. There is a couple of photo's there. The
San Diego river is now clean and a favorite spot for local
residents to walk and enjoy. There are fully landscaped commer-
cial, business and residential areas, including a hotel. All of
these usages co-exist in harmony with our mining operation. OUr
Calmat Cajon Creek Project has a similar potential for the San
Bernardino area. This project will be the beginning of a new era
and enlightened industrial economic development for the Northern
Gateway to the City of San Bernardino. The project will bring
carefully planned and landscaped industrial areas, sand and
gravel for construction materials to maintain and develop the
city and region. Conservation of 745 acres of riverine habitat, a
recreational educational nature trail, and most important, jobs
and city revenues to help revitalize and expand the local econo-
my. The Calmat Cajon Creek Project is master planned. It is
designed to buffer and integrate industrial mining usages with
commercial, recreational and residential uses. The master plan
calls for a balance to approach. Although 80% of this site is
currently zoned for mining, under the plan 53% of the site will
be conserved as open spaced. Other areas are devoted to industri-
al development. Areas that are mined will be either reclaimed and
re-vegetated as open space or prepared for industrial develop-
ment. We recognize that there are some questions that concern our
neighbors. Wind and dust control are important to everyone. We
have 1392 acres in the project area. When high winds blow, dust
blows uncontrolled over these acres. Once we start development on
our project site we are responsible to control dust generated
from all areas we disturb. We will be utilizing the latest dust
suppression techniques as well as providing wind breaks, and
berm's for our mining operation. Page 2 in your binder, excuse
Page 3
,
r
~
me, page 3 in your binder has a picture of one of our wind
monitoring stations which is out at the Cajon Creek site right
now and tells a little bit about it. Data from this station will
help us determine our high wind response plant and operations
design. We cannot control the wind but we can control our opera-
tions. As our project builds out, dust will be further reduced
due to buildings, landscaping and paving. In the mediate benefi-
ciary of the wind and dust data we have collected for Cajon Creek
is our Highland plant. This 1940's style plant is being retrofit-
ted.
If you would like to turn to the Highland section in your binder
you will see outlines of the improvements that we are making at
this plant today.
Everyone worries about traffic. This project site has the benefit
of freeway access less than one mile away. We will not have to
use local streets to access the freeway. To ensure that our rock
trucks use our designated routing and are operating in a safe
manner, we're doing the following: Establishing traffic safety
agreements that are Holler assigned. An example of this which I
will pass out at the end of the meeting is one we used in San
Diego which basically list rules of the road. Establishing a hot-
line, color, time, and location are all that are needed for
residents to call and identify a truck, and we follow-up on
complaints. Calmat was the first company in our industry in
Southern California to have a truck safety program which recog-
nizes safe operators. We established this program in 1935, we are
proud of our traffic safety record.
Noise is also a concern to our neighbors. Noise from our opera-
tions will not be intrusive to the neighborhood areas. By using
the latest technology our mining operation can co-exist with our
neighbors. We have proven this at other sites, including Mission
Valley. The project brings many benefits to San Bernardino.
Please turn to the benefit section in your binder for a summary.
There will be jobsl Industrial development will generate over
11,000 for skilled and semi-skilled labor. Job training, hire
locally programs will be incorporated. There will be revenuesl
Revenues to both the city and the RDA. There will protected open
space, 745 acres of open space with the hiking and a equestrian
trail. If you refer to ah, some of the earlier pages in your
binder you will see some photographs showing the sites current
condition. There will be sewer, drainage, street and intersection
improvements. There will be improved development standards for
industry in the area. There will be sand and gravel to build and
maintain homes, streets, highways, schools, offices, parks and
patios. There will be redevelopment of mine areas for industrial
or open space and re-vegetation for habitat conservation. Final-
ly, Cajon Creek will be become a hub of the region's Inland port
for economic growth. Calmat brings the experience, the commit-
ment, and the resources to deliver these benefits. The challenges
faced by this community today are tremendous, low paying jobs,
Page 4
.
long commutes, reduced revenues, the loss of Norton Air Force
Base, and the Santa Fe Railroad yard have taken their toll. There
are no quick fixes to these challenges, only with sound planning
and vision can San Bernardino move forward with this economic
revitalization. Calmat is willing to make a substantial corporate
investment, without public subsidies to help this community take
charge of itself, and prepare for the future. We are a major U.S.
Company, our products are made and used in America, we create
American jobs. If approved, we will playa vital role in San
Bernardino's future economic growth. Because so many of our
mining operations occur in urban areas we understand the impor-
tance of being a good neighbor. Calmat has a policy of two way
communication with the communities we serve. To us, community out
reach is a corner stone of long term success. The Cajon Creek
project draws on our past experience and other communities. The
community out reach program is designed to be very comprehensive
and broad in scope. To assure the community that we will follow
through with our out reach programs, we will establish a Calmat
Cajon Creek Community Committee, including representatives from
the North West project advisory, Cimmaron Ranch, Muscoy, Verde-
mont, Devore, the Northern Gateway Business Association, and any
other interested community group. This committee will meet on a
quarterly basis or more often if needed, for the purposes of
discussing project development and mining operations. As you can
see from samples in the community out reach section of your
binder, our program is well on their way. In addition to the
Calmat Cajon Creek Community Committee we will also form a trails
committee, establish a hot-line, establish and adopt a school
program, and participate in job training hire locally programs.
Our community out reach are designed to be on-going and flexible
throughout the life of the project. New programs will be devel-
oped and implemented as needed. By working directly with our
neighbors, we can solve problems and address their concerns. We
back up our commitment in writing, so you will know that we will
follow through on our promises. There is an on-going need for
sand and gravel mining. It provides reasonably price materials
for local building and maintenance. Proposed major improvements
to our infrastructure as well as the buildings and offices to
locate new companies here, are not possible without the materials
we supply. The green flyer, in the front of your binder, clearly
demonstrates this need. The Cajon Creek Site was designated by
the state of California as a significant sand, gravel resource,
at the time we purchased the property. It is also currently zoned
for industrial extractive. But Calmat will not be mining the
entire area and abandoning it like mining was done in the 1920's.
The Calmat proposal was taking advantage of advance planning and
state-of-the-art technology where environmental concerns steward-
ship's of natural resources, reclamation and reuse of the land
are the first priority. We are not making empty promises, we are
making our commitment in writing, legal and binding, and specific
plan 90-01. We have the experience, the track record to prove
that we can what we say. Calmat is a progressive company commit-
Page 5
.
..
ted to addressing community concerns, committed to following
environmental regulations, and committed to following meeting
general plan objectives. Our project provides over 11,000 new
jobs. It will be a major factor in beginning economic revitaliza-
tion for the San Bernardino area. Recommending approval of this
project will mean a "YES" vote by you, the commissioners, to
11,000 jobs. A "YES" to city revenues, a "YES" vote to 745 acres
of open space, a "YES" vote to habitat conservation, "YES" to job
training hire locally programs, a "YES" vote to master planning
and strict regulation and control, "YES" to a company that has
the means and resources to keep its word. "YES" to a company
committed to community out reach, and a "YES" vote for the
beginning of San Bernardino's economic recovery. This concludes
my presentation, I want to thank you for the opportunity to
present our facts, and I'll be available following the city
Staffs presentation for questions.
Uniden~ified Speaker: Thank you Mr. Sprague. Deborah, you would
please hold up the applause please. Deborah, give us a brief
overview of what has happened to date, summary of the process of
the city consultant team and the recommendations.
Deborah Woldruff: As Mr. Boughey indicated in his presentation
ah, the independent review was determined to be necessary at the
June 16, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. And MEG/Associates,
and John Minch and Associates, and Certified Earths Metrics, were
contracted with to do that review.
Staff and this city's consultant team worked pretty closely on
this project. Ah, we took their comments and worked with them
very closely on the document. We provided them with copies of all
the documents that they would need for the review. Ah, on Novem-
ber 20th, I'm sorry. On November 20th, staff and the city's
consultant team met with the applicant and his consultants in
order to find some solutions for certain issues that were empha-
sized by the consultant team and as yet remained unresolved. We
met again on February 1, 1993, to find finalize the document that
you received. The study resulted in addendum to the EIR, and I
will go into that a little bit more when I give you an update on
the CEQA status of the project. A detailed discussion describing
the CEQA process and the status of the project was contained in
your June 16 staff report, if you recall. As stated, the need for
an independent review was determined at June 16, Planning Commis-
sion meeting, and the addendum document contains comments from
the consultant team and responses from the applicant. It is
formatted very similarly to final EIR and the major conclusions
which emerged from that review are that: #1, the project will not
create any significant affects which were not previously evaluat-
ed in the EIR; #2 the significant affects discussed in the EIR
will not be substantially more severe than anticipated; #3 that
no mitigation measures or alternatives which were previously
thought to be infeasible or were not previously considered are
Page 6
.
~.
now considered feasible or found to be substantially ah to reduce
one or more significant affects. These relate to the four (4)
topics that were identified, hydrology, air quality, geology, and
visual resources. Essentially the conclusions of the EIR, which
include the draft EIR and the draft final EIR, had not changed as
a result of the information contained in the review document. The
information in the review document clarifies the discussions
contained in the draft EIR and final draft EIR makes technical
changes only. Therefore, under the provisions of CEQA Guidelines
section l5l64A, B, C, the review document qualified as an adden-
dum to the final EIR.
If you would like I'll give you a brief review of the CEQA status
that was presented to you at the June 16th Planning Commission
meeting. The significant and environmental affects and signifi-
cant cumulative environmental affects of the project, the EIR
addresses the area of environmental concern, environmental
affects associated with the project and mitigation of the envi-
ronmental affects. A majority of the environmental affects
identified can be mitigated to below a level of significance. The
significance environmental affects that cannot be mitigated to
below a level of significance are biological, these would be
impacts resulting from project development if the slender horn
spine flower is found to be present on the project site during
surveys. The second one is impacts to air quality and these would
be local and would result from the creation of dust emissions
during Santa Ana wind conditions. The third is related to land
use and this is resulting from the conversion of approximately
124 acres of State designated, regionally significant mineral
resource land to other incompatible uses, this is identified in
the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975.
Implementation of the project may also result a cumulative
impacts to air quality that cannot be fully mitigated. The
emissions source is for these air quality impacts are listed as
follows: combustion emissions from the project will incrementally
impede the ultimate attainment of clean air standards and project
generated vehicular and other fuel combustion emissions combined
with other south coast air basin and emissions and dust which
would be PM/10. The mitigation identified the EIR will reduce
these cumulative impacts but not to a level of insignificance.
Because of these ah significant, cumulative significant impacts,
ah pursuant to Section 15091 through Section 15093 of CEQA
Guidelines, a public agency cannot approve of project for which
in the EIR has been completed that identifies one or more signif-
icant unavoidable environmental affects unless it makes one or
more written findings for each affect. The lead agency is re-
quired to support each finding with substantial evidence in the
record and to adopt a Statement of Overriding Consideration for
each unavoidable environmental affect. This requires that the
public agency balance the benefits of the proposed project
against this unavoidable environmental risk. Therefore, any
Page 7
~
.
.
recommendation of the Planning Commission to the Mayor and Common
Council for approval of the Calmat Cajon Creek specific plan and
its other related applications should include a list of projects
benefits so that the Planning Commission feels outweigh the
significant affects and the cumulative significant affect and
warrant the approval of the project. A list of project benefits
was prepared and is contained in attachment A of your Staff
report today.
A little bit more on review and refresher. On May 14, 1992, the
environmental Review Committee reviewed the environmental impact
report, prepared for the Calmat Cajon Creek project, and deter-
mined that the project would resolve in admissible significant
impacts and cumulative significant impacts, the ERC recommended
that the EIR be certified if the findings could be made that the
benefits of the project outweighed the environmental impacts. The
ERC recommended that the Planning commission recommended to the
Mayor and Council that a Statement of Overriding Consideration be
prepared for each environmental impact and that the Calmat Cajon
Creek project be approved.
During the June 16th Planning Commission meeting, 28 persons
testified during the public hearing process. Let me get to my
place here, excuse me one moment. The 28 persons testified in the
public hearing, a listing of those persons that testified is
included under the comments section of your staff report. These
names were taken directly from the draft minutes for that meet-
ing. In addition, letters and other written comments were re-
ceived. These were prior, a lot of them were prior to the June
16th Planning Commission meeting, within a month of that meeting.
We received other written comments since then. The copy of the
letters, ah, a majority of the letters are contained in attach-
ment F, and these comments are not included in the draft final
EIR because they were received outside the forty-five day public
review period for the final EIR. Since the Planning commission
packet was prepared we have received some additional letters, you
were given copies of those letters this evening. One letter in
particular, the Devore Rural Protection Association letter which
was dated January 4, 1993, was received by the City. This letter
referenced the first draft of the independent review by the
City's consultant team. The first draft of the review document
did not include responses to the questions and concerns that were
posed by the City's consultant team. As a result the conclusions
contained in their letter of January 4, were based on an incom-
plete document. To eliminate confusion, we prepared responses
which addressed these concerns. They are contained in Attachment
G, and to clarify a point, in that document I stated that MEG/-
Associates the city's consultant team, had indicated that the EIR
was adequate. In fact they have reviewed the documents for the
four items that have been listed; hydrology, air quality, biolo-
gy, and visual resources, and they find that the document is
adequate with regard to those items.
Page 8
.
~.
In the staff report, we have prepared the responses to some major
issues that were identified as a result of the letters and the
public testimony that was given. Those items are: Air Quality,
Hydrology, Biology, Visual Resources which we feel were addressed
in the addendum document. We also have addressed concerns relat-
ing to geology, public services, utilities, traffic and circula-
tion, noise, land use, quality of life, and the annexation of the
area and the benefits of discussion which is course statement of
Overrunning considerations, asI mentioned is in Attachment A.
These items for the most part were addressed in the EIR and in
all of the project documents. The Specific Plan document, and its
technical appendices, the conditional use permit document which
contains the mining plan and the reclamation plans in addition to
the environmental impact report which includes the draft EIR, ah
the draft final EIR, ah mitigation monitoring..........
END OF TAPE 1 SIDE 1
Unidentified Speaker: Their response which addressed (not audi-
ble)
Deborah Woldruff: ....were identified as a result of the letters
and of the publics testimony that was given, ah those items are
air quality, hydrology, biology, visual resources which we feel
were addressed in the addendum document. We also have addressed
concerns relating to Geology, Public Services and utilities,
traffic and circulation, noise, land use, quality of life and
annexation of the area and the benefits of discussion which is
course statement of OVerrunning considerations. As I mentioned is
in Attachment A. These items were for the most part addressed in
the EIR and in all of project documents. The Specific Plan
document and its technical appendices, the conditional use permit
document which contains the mining plan and the reclamation plans
in addition to the environmental impact report which includes the
draft EIR, ah, the final EIR, ah mitigation monitoring program
and the addendum. So most of these issues, well all of these
issues have been addressed. We tried to provide some clarifica-
tion in the staff report. If the Planning Commission would like I
can go through these items, if not, they are available in the
staff report.
Mr. Boughey: Mr. Chairman
Commissioner Lopez: Ah, yes Mr. Boughey, if that completes Deb-
orah's presentation unless you have any questions. Ah, I would
suggest that if it is the Planning Commissions desire our consul-
tant, MEG/Associates Marie Gilliam, I would like to have her
summarize their review processes they completed on behalf of the
city.
Unidentified Speaker: Mr. Valles, very quickly pleasel
Unidentified Speaker: Yes, just one question Debbie. You handed
Page 9
,
.
*
us Attachment F, and what surprises me is that we have two August
agencies within the County bringing out some particular points
that should of been addressed during the public section of the
review of the EIR. I'm talking about Environmental Health Servic-
es and Transportation/Flood, because they bring out some very
legitimate questions. Do you know why we just received the
letters today?
Deborah woldruff: The ah letters from ah, I'm sorry, from the
Flood Control District was just received today. We did receive
letters from Transportation Flood Control Districts during the
public review process for the EIR. This letter in particular is
addressing some issues that are the result of the recent floods.
Unidentified Speaker: The head-cutting in particular.
Deborah woldruff: Ah, head-cutting in particular. The revised
conditions of approval, there is a condition of approval but
addresses head-cutting for up stream and down stream erosion.
Subsequent studies that would be required for development permits
for mining, this issue was addressed in the addendum document and
the condition of approval is a result of that review. Ah, the
latest issue on mining however, Calmat and the City are working
with the Flood Control District on this item. The other letter
from DEHS is in relation to the Calmat Cajon landfill, the
County's landfill out there. This issue regarding migration of
gas was addressed in the final EIR as part of the response
comments. We received comment during the 45-day public review
period from the State Board of (I always have trouble with their
name) but from the State regarding this issue. There are condi-
tions of approval and some mitigation that the applicant would be
required to monitor for gas. I think that the bottom line is that
ah State Law does require however, that landfill operators
ultimately are responsible for remediation of the landfill. So,
Calmat's conditions of approval do include some conditions
requiring them to monitor for gas. It is the responsibility of
the County to handle the remediation and any issues that result
from the landfill.
Unidentified Speaker: Marie Gilliam, give us your name and
address for the record.
Marie Gilliam: Marie Gilliam, MEG/Associates, 1048 Irvine Avenue,
Suite 325, Newport Beach, California. I represent basically the
Project Manager for the consultant team that was contracted with
the City to provide the independent review of the draft EIR. The
documents specifically that we reviewed were the draft EIR, the
draft final EIR, the technical appendices, and the mitigation
monitoring program that was part of the draft EIR. I maybe
repeating some of the things Deborah said, but ah, I just want to
go back over these particular points. We addressed the subjects
of air quality, surface hydrology, biological and visual resourc-
Page 10
.......
u
es. Our contract included evaluating the documents to determine
if the conclusions in the documents were supported by the data
presented. If the conclusions accurately reflected the potential
impacts, the adequacy of the depth of research that was under-
taken, and the adequacy of the mitigation and the mitigation
monitoring program. After reviewing those documents that I
mentioned for those particular items we issued a written report
to the City in mid-September and held two subsequent meetings
with the City staff and Calmat's EIR consultant team to review
our comments and to discuss their responses to our review. A
variety of changes and additional information has been provided
by their team and is presented as Deborah said in the addendum to
the EIR. These responses to the review teams comments augment
information that was contained in the draft EIR and the related
documents. We feel with revisions and additions substantially
strengthen the EIR in the areas that we evaluated and believe
that the addendum that is presented provide the defensible
analysis of the issues that we addressed. The investigations
conducted found no new significant project specific impacts. If
you would like I can go down some of the primary concerns that we
did discuss, if not, the individual team members are here to
answer questions of the Planning Commission. If you have ques-
tions about your quality I would ask one favor, that we take
those first because Dr. Hogan has flown down here from San
Francisco and would like to return tonight if possible.
Mr. Boughey: Yes, at this point that completes the staff presen-
tation that by the applicant. Ah, I think if ah, if we previously
close to public hearing in June and it will be up to the Planning
Commission whether you wish to receive additional testimony
tonight.
Uniden~ified Speaker: Before we do that I want to ask the Plan-
ning Commission, there is a 5 minute video tape available if you
want to see it, all those that want to see it would you raise
your hands, so staff can set it up. Valerie, what is the subject
matter of that video tape.
Valerie: As I understand it, it has to do with biological re-
sources. Ah, I've been told that I'm incorrect. Could we ask the
person who wishes to show it, what it pertains to?
Uniden~ified Speaker: Yesl
Leeona Klips~ein: Yes, my name is Leeona Klipstein, I'm President
of Friends of the Foothills. I'm coordinator of San Bernardino
Sage Fronts, invited member of the State Resources Agency,
National Communities Conservation Planning on Sage Scrub. I do
have a short verbal presentation but the video tape that I have
is that we are making a video right now about this ECO Systems
that only is found here in Southern California which this project
would impact. The portion that I would like to show you from this
Page 11
.
~
video is actually the Mayor of Azusa talking about what impact
the mining has had on that community and some of the health,
safety and general welfare issues, and that is what I would like
to present to you.
Unidentified Speaker: Mr. Chairman, does this mean that we are
opening up the ........
Commissioner Lopez: No, this is a - - if you want to see the
video, yes or no. I'm asking the Commissioners, please.
Unidentified Speaker: Am I correct in assuming that you're
speaking in opposition of this project?
Laeona Klipstein: Ah, I'm with myself, tonight I'm speaking in
opposition because I feel the biological resources are inadequate
and not in compliance with CEQA.
Unidentified Speaker: The reason I ask because there is a time
for opposition statements and a time for those that are in favor,
if we reopen for public hearing. We have not done that yet. There
is a time that you may get a chance to show your video.
Unidentified Speaker: At that time the Commission will decide
whether they want to see the video or not. Thank you.
Laeona Klipstein: Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Of the task before the Planning Commission
tonight is to finalize a recommendation to the Mayor and Common
Council. We recommend to the Mayor and Common Council. I also
want to remind the Planning Commission that rules of order state
that the Commission will not meet past 11:00 unless the Commis-
sions decides to go further than that. The public hearing was
closed but we, its up to the Planning commission to reopen the
public hearing to receive in-put if they wish.
Unidentified Speaker: Mr. Chairman!
Commissioner Lopez: Yes, Mr. Stone.
Hr. Stone: I move to reopen public hearing.
Commissioner Lopez: All in favor. The public hearing is open. We
will ask the public to comply with the following request so that
the Planning commission can accomplish the necessary task. We
request that Comments be limited to three minutes per person, so
that there is time to receive all the in-put and allow time for
the Planning Commission to discuss and make recommendations. A
staff member will keep track of the time and will alert that
speaker when they have 30 seconds left. The staff member will
call time when three minutes have elapsed. Neither staff nor the
Page 12
~
applicant will respond to any questions during the public hearing
portion of the meeting. They will respond in rebuttal. I ask that
the staff and the applicant make notes of the comments received
so that the responses can be made at the close of the public
hearing. I am going to take all those in favor of the project
first. All those in favor, there is Mr. Williams.....
Unidentified Speaker: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, before we do
that, can we, we didn't have the swearing in of those people
wishing to speak tonight. So if we can go ahead and have that
done at this time.
Unidentified Speaker: Anyone wishing to address the Planning
Commission tonight, please stand and raise your right hand. Do
you affirm that the testimony that you are about to give before
this body will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth, if so please say I do. Thank youl Please be seated.
Commissioner Lopez: Mr. william Harrison, and then we will have
Frank Williams, Robert Dye, could you stand over here and be
ready to speak. Go ahead Mr. Harrison. Just your name and ad-
dress.
Mr. Harrison: I am William Harrison Jr., I have been in San
Bernardino for many-many years. I've been .......
Commissioner Lopez: Could you give us your address please.
Mr. Harrison: 4675 Woodbend Lane, in San Bernardino.
Commissioner Lopez: Go ahead I
Mr. Harrison: I have been interested in San Bernardino for over
70 years. I've been in business in San Bernardino, I am a broker,
retired, I'm an honorary lifetime broker in the state of Califor-
nia, one of the three in San Bernardino. My heart is in San
Bernardino and what I am interested in that will help San Bernar-
dino. There are two or three things that I think of in regard to
this project. Number #1, as I have said, I have been here many
years, I have seen two of the old Arrowhead Springs Hotels burn
to the ground and threaten San Bernardino with fire. I have seen
many things that I didn't like and I a have seen some things that
I would like and one of those things is this project that is
coming up now. I have no vested interest, I am not going to have
a job with Calmat. I have no property ownership, so I am speaking
one hundred percent for San Bernardino itself. I have been in
that North area, a very good friend of mine has a cafe up -
called Joe's Country Corner, I have seen what has gone on that
property. I have had a great fear for many years after seeing
again the fires on Little Mountain, Shandin Hills, and the rest
of these things. If we had a North wind and that area cought fire
San Bernardino, or the West end of San Bernardino would certainly
Page 13
c,
be wiped out or could be wiped out. The people that have their
homes South of that should get down on their knees and thank the
dear Lord that there is going to be a project like this to clean
that area up and make it as nice as it is going to be according
to all of the plans that I have seen. The other thing that is
most important to me is the drug area that is being fostered in
that, on Calmat property, that will be wiped out. (You have 30
seconds) I am certainly hoping that you, the Planning commission
will pass and give approval to this project. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Mr. williams, give us your name and address
please.
Mr. Williams: My name is Frank Williams, my address is 8400
Hermosa Avenue, Apartment "0", Rancho Cucamonga, California. If I
might approach the bench and ah - I'm not going to address the
environmental issues, your staff and the able consulting team
that you put together has recommended ah this project for approv-
al. However, my main concern is jobs. Two weeks ago in this room,
Governor Wilson was here. He signed a bill which will aide
bringing some 4,000 jobs to San Bernardino County, ah Norton.
That package represented about a 45 to 50 million dollar invest-
ment that government is going to make to bring in 4,000 jobs.
Certainly 11,000 jobs could, you could lend a boost to bring that
type of jobs to this community. The article that I pointed out to
you, I work for the Building Industry Association but I'm here on
my own tonight. I represent an industry that has lost 30,000 jobs
in Southern California. Right in this area, 10,000 construction
workers are out of jobs. Jobs and people are important. So I hope
that you will weigh jobs heavy in your decision tonight. Thank
youl
Commissioner Lopez: Mr. Dye, give us your name and address
please. Next will be Joe Perez and Mark Brownton.
Mr. Dye: Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, my name is Robert W. Dye. I
live at 1523 Indian Trail, San Bernardino, California. I am here
not only as a resident near the proposed Cajon Creek site, we are
here from the Central Labor and Building Trades Council for
Riverside and San Bernardino County. During the past several
years we have suffered anywhere from 25 to 50% unemployment,
especially the skilled craftsmen in the building trades. I'm also
the district representative for the International Operation
Engineer Local 12 for Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial
County. We have a membership of 25,000. Approximately 5,400
members live here. Over 900 members are on the out of work list
and many live in the city of San Bernardino and the Inland Empire
area. There are several points of interest we would like you to
consider: #1 we need jobs, good paying jobs. The wages and
benefits earned by Calmat employees will stay in the community
including programs like Equal Opportunity for all races, women,
affirmative action, and apprenticeships, schooling and training
Page 14
schools are in place with our local union. A health and the
welfare for insurance and a pension plan is also in place. We are
concerned about protecting the environment also but in today's
high technology, in our industry along with restriction put on
employers like Calmat control production. Again control produc-
tion can be maintained in a balance with nature and the communi-
ty. Noise and dust control is very important to us, and Calmat's
safety record is far superior to many other suppliers within our
community. As a suggestion, this Planning Commission or City
Council could request a periodic check on this facility to
address any existing problems that may arise from the local
residents, the businesses, or the schools, etc. I have three
children that have attended North Park Elementary School, Cajon
High School, my seventeen year old is considering Cal State to
further his education. Yes, we all have concerns about Cajon
Creek, but we want you to know that we are here to support Calmat
as well as the workers and the families who live here in the City
of San Bernardino. Thank you for your time.
Commissioner Lopez: Mr. Joe Perez, give us your name and address
please. "Suzy. Atanasova.
Mr. Joe Perez: I'm Joe Perez, I'm the Executive Secretary of the
Building Trades Councils of San Bernardino, and Riverside Count-
ies. Good evening Commissioners. I'd like to go on record if we
possibly could in supporting the Cajon Creek Project. That's the
entire Building Trades Council. Bobby gave you some numbers
regarding the operating engineers in this city and they are vast.
However, the overall concept of building trades, you are talking
about 15,000 people in San Bernardino proper, you are talking
50,000 that would be affected by something like this overall in
the Inland Empire. It would reach far out. I know it would reach
Rancho Cucamonga. At this time, if I may, I would like to request
a request that the Commission recommend to the Mayor and Common
Council that this project ah be adopted, or passed, or whatever-
whatever term you want to use. I'd like to address, I would go on
further but I think Doug Sprague did a wonderful job in explain-
ing the project. I would like to say something to the opposition
that I haven't heard yet, but I've read a lot of reports in the
paper ah. What I'd like to say primarily is that I understand
their concerns because I've been on both sides of any issue.
However, if they would take the time to go to San Diego and I
really mean this, and look at the Mission Hill development or
whatever it is you call it, I forgot what, what is, Mission
Valley ah development, I took the time to do it. It is impres-
sive, it may, it may, ah help them get over SOme of the fears
that they feel they have that I'm sure are real to them. However,
if you would go down and look at that project, they are mining,
they are developing, and its beautiful. In summation, all I can
say is that the beauty of this project in relationship to what I
saw today when I drove out there, through those fields and
through those dirt roads, you've got couches out there, you've
Page 15
"
'.
got tires out there, its become a mass dumping ground that looks
for the County of San Bernardino. I realize you can't enforce
something like this, they go out there at night in trucks and
they dump. The beauty of this project in relationship to what is
out there now I feel, if the opposition would just think about
it, look at the total picture, I feel that this project is a
plus-plus benefit for everyone concerned. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Go ahead Suzy. Miss.....
"Suzy" Atanasova: Hi, I'll keep this short and sweet.
commissioner Lopez: Give us your name and address please.
"Suzy" Atanasova: My name is Suzy Atanasova, I'm Ward 2 City
Council candidate in the upcoming primary municipal elections. My
address is 780 East Ninth Street in San Bernardino. I have a
valid designation as Low Pole Community Advocate with special
permission of the FPPC, only in my instance and only in this
election. Because I've dedicated my entire adult life to better-
ing my local community. I feel like there has never been a better
opportunity for San Bernardino and its residents, and the entire
United States on the Western seaboard than the Calmat project and
the Cajon Creek Project. We need jobs, people are asking, people
are begging for jobs. I really thought our government use to
stand up listen and give us these jobs. I hate to see Calmat go
else where after all these years and all this money and all this
effort and all these people and all these unions that are sup-
porting this project I really hope that our governing bodies take
a moment and listen to what the people want this time. We want
this, we need this, please give it to us now. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Ted Kauffman and then Mark Brownton, did we
hear from him?
Ted Kauffman: Thank you Mr. Chairman and Commissioners. My name
is Ted Kauffman, I'm Director of Industrial Development for Santa
Fe Railway, office in Los Angeles at 3770 E. 26th Street. I
previously wrote a letter to Deborah Woldruff just in the event
that it didn't get here in time to get into your packets, I
wanted to reiterate more or less what I said in that letter. We
believe the location of this property given its relative nearness
to the freeway system to three rail lines ah, the combined Santa
Fe Union Pacific Line and then the Southern Pacific route that it
seems to fit very well for the proposed plan as, as, as ah
proposed by Calmat. We believe it offers many opportunities for
industrial development for locations that should create new jobs
for this region and the city of San Bernardino. We also believe
that the existing development that has occurred between Cajon
Blvd., Interstate 215, ah South of Verdemont and then as well the
Cargio Flower Mill facility it seems that has somewhat estab-
lished a pattern of development in that area. And the development
Page 16
,
~
proposed by Calmat should fit very nicely with what has already
begun out there. Thank you very much.
Commissioner Lopez: Thank youl Mark Brownton and Robert Dye.
Mark Brownton: Mark Brownton, 5486 Industrial Parkway. I'm the
President of the Northern Gateway Business Association which we
just recently formed. We will represent businesses North of
University Parkway up to the University through the Cajon Wash.
And I am also a resident of Devore. I also have been a past
member of the DRPA. This is difficult because I live right in the
middle of Devore and I will have to deal with my neighbors up
there. But I have looked at this particular Calmat project very
closely. I have worked with Doug Sprague and he has given me an
outline that will work. He has given his legal word that it will
work. And I believe that if this is not approved, the property
will be sold and it will be a mix match of business that will
never control. Under one control of Calmat, one plan, I believe
that it can be done well, work with the communities and everybody
can work together. You are about to hear some comments of emo-
tions. And I hope that you, ladies and gentlemen, will not take
this personally, because they are going to say that your reports
that do not know what you are talking about. I have looked at the
reports and I believe that they will work. I have walked that
property and it is anywhere but close to being ecological bal-
anced. There is trashed cars that whole area needs to be redone.
Thank you for your time.
Commissioner Lopez: Is their anyone else out there that is in
favor of this that was sworn in? If not I'm going to call on the
opposition, all those that is opposed to this project. You have
three minutes, when you hear the bell you have thirty seconds
left and we would wish that you abide by those rules. Charles
Cox, Tom Frossard, Suzy Dubay. Could you come forward please.
Give us your name and address.
Charles Cox: My name is Charles Herman Cox, ah I live at 3511
June Street in Muscoy area of San Bernardino County. I've lived
for over thirty-five years. The location of the project that is
about to take place is in the Muscoy wash where I grew up from
about 10 years old on, we use to hunt rabbits and all kinds of
things out there in the wash, and it was pretty much rural remote
area. Most of the people here that is representing tonight, that
is representing Calmat, they are affiliated with Calmat in one
way or another. Mainly on the payroll. I'm not on the payroll of
Ca1mat. I'd like to see this project go but not in that area.
There is a hundred other areas in the desert that this could go
where there is no residential community down wind of it, and
anybody who has ever lived in the muscoy area especially for as
long as I have is familiar with the wind and its enormous wind,
over a hundred miles an hour at times, ah in certain time of the
year when we have the Santa Ana wind conditions. The other times
Page 17
L
-
when the US Festival was conducted at Glen Helen Park the over
spill of traffic and communication and transportation problems of
people at that park, we could not even go in or out of our
community because the area is not designed for that traffic load.
And the San Bernardino County and the City is developing Glen
Helen Park even further to where there will be so many people
there at different times of the year for functions nobody will
either be able to get in or out of that entire area, which
includes Devore, Verdemont, Muscoy, all around the Glen Helen
area. Other evidence is all the other city's that has had mining
in their neighborhoods, the City of Redlands, the City of High-
land, the City of Azusa, the city of Irwindale, the City of
Rialto, the City of Colton have all had enormous problems with
mining close to a residential area. All you have to do is go over
to Redlands and find out that the protest that the people are
making there against ah the projects that are out there on Palm
Avenue and Orange Avenue. The pollution and noise when the US
Festival and other public functions take place at Glen Helen, I
live almost five miles from Glen Helen and I can hear it just as
clear as I can hear most of these people in this room tonight and
it is five miles away. Because of the wind conditions of Cajon
Pass, I strongly recommend that this project be abandoned for
this area and another suitable location be found. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Tom Frossard, Susan Dubay.
Tom Frossard: Hello, I'm Tom Frossard, I live at 4623 San Benito
Street in the Cimmaron Ranch developments, City of San Bernar-
dino. The first thing that I would like to address is the wind
and the dust. The dust is known as PM-10, its small particulates,
it can land in your lungs and they don't come out. They begin to
build and that's the one un-mitigatable thing that you guys are
going to use overriding considerations to let it go. The second
thing that I feel is a very important issue is the fact that you
are going to have 80,000 pound trucks running the same streets
that school buses run on. Doug Sprague tells you that you have
one mile from the facility to the freeway on ramp. In actuality
between that you have the Santa Fe and Union Pacific Lines. They
have regular train service through there that would definitely
delay the trucks if not something else. So there plan is to turn
North on Cajon Blvd. and turn back around and come down to Palm.
That trip will probably be more around four or five miles. The
thing about school buses is they're very delicately handled. The
CHP monitors everything they do, they have safety checks, they
have a lot of things that go with them and no one wants to see
children hurt. That is why they have all these requirements.
Tractor trailers also are regulated. The thing about aggregate
hauling trucks they don't go a great distance, they don't end up
stopping at the scales, they don't have - they don't have regular
inspections. You can combine this with the owner operator theory
that is mostly used hauling arrogated along with economic times
as they maybe, you have a truck driver who has the possibility of
Page 18
~
.
"
running an extra load in the day, he makes more money. He may be,
by passes that preventive maintenance that he could have and
should have done, he's got more money in his pocket. Now you put
ah 80,000 pound truck on the same strip of street as school buses
loaded with a hundred children, one collision and you have blood
bath. A major incident and I think this is something that really
needs to be thought about. I think that you could at least have
an alternate route to the freeway that wouldn't encompass the
same streets that are used by the surface that are used by the
school buses. The only other thing that I can think of is I'm not
against jobs. I'd love to work here in town, I drive an hour and
a half each way to work. I'd like to work right there at Calmat
too, that would be great. But I don't think he is going to have
my kind of job, (time) Can I say one thing. I just like to know
about all the people that are here tonight that are in support of
this how many of you actually live down wind of this project.
Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Susan Dubay, Jeffrey Davis, Geraldine Wong,
Stewart Cummings. Go ahead and give us your name and address
please.
Susan Dubay: My name is Susan Dubay, I live at 17720 Kenwood in
Devore and I would like to speak about jobs. Specifically the
6,400 proposed jobs that Calmat believes that will bring to this
area because of its mining and its proposed industrial and
commercial complex in along Cajon Creek. They estimate that it
will take 25 years to bring sixty-four hundred jobs to this area.
That's 256 jobs a year. According to demographics provided by
Urban Decisions Systems Incorporated, there are six mining
operations in a seven mile radius of North San Bernardino. These
six businesses employee thirty-four people. The 284 manufacturing
companies in this area employee 7,026 people, and 500 and 1500
hundred construction oriented businesses support 5,899 people.
According to our demographics these three types of industries
employee a total of 12,959 persons in the whole seven mile radius
of North San Bernardino. Is it reasonable to believe that one
industrial and commercial complex will employee roughly half that
many people at any reasonable time in the future or that they
will employee an estimated 800 people in the mining and related
materials industry. I'm kind of betting that a lot of the employ-
ees are probably imported from other sites. There is reportedly
an over abundance of commercial and industrial square footage in
our area, that it has been estimated it will take until at least
the year 2000 to fill. That was before anybody knew Norton Air
Force Base was going to close. So that means that the private
sector has to compete with Norton Air Force Base too. As local
residents, we feel that the Calmat commercial complex is unneces-
sary and that the mining operation does not have sufficient
economic benefits to justify the damage it will do to the sur-
rounding neighbors and habitat. Speaking for myself personally as
well as a resident around there, my husband and I are also a
Page 19
,
.
general contractors and this has been a difficult year. But I
would rather not do anything short sighted, that ruined my neigh-
borhood. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Jeffrey Davis, give us your name and address
please.
Jeffrey Davis: Mr. Chairman, my name is Jeffrey Davis, I live at
4495 Don Diego Street in San Bernardino. It is also part of the
Cimmaron track area. I hope you kind of bear with me, I'm not a
speaker, I'm just a regular old fireman that kind of works his
butt off to make a meager income and I speak very badly. I would
kind of like to relay some of the confusion that is going on and
maybe make this kind of a personal item, so that you know that
there are people that are being affected. The people that are
being affected are the ones that are within close to one hundred
yards of this project and it expands out further than that. I
happen to live within the one hundred yards and it is going to
directly affect me. I see a number of problems there. I obviously
don't have enough time to go through all of them. They had talked
about it being emotional, and you are going to hear a lot about
emotional pleas. well of course it is, we are only human. All of
us out here, as well as myself, work very hard to make some type
of money to try to give some type of roof over our heads and some
type of standard of living for our family. I have a new baby, I
have a wife, and we finally had a chance to try to achieve the
California American dream to have a house. We bought this house
in San Bernardino because it was, it was a new neighborhood that
was started. There was a lot of other young couples that were
coming in, a lot of people excited about finally being able to be
involved in the California American dream, to have a home and to
have their family. This project has or our development has never
once been mentioned in a lot of the studies. The earliest studies
just called us an unincorporated area. They never mention indi-
viduals, they talked about how the Calmat people had come out and
talked to representatives of us, they have never talked to us.
They have come out once and tried to sell their program to us and
we were in opposition, we tried to go ahead and explain to them
exactly what it would be. What type of affects it would be on us.
Basically they gave their sales pitch and they left. They never
took any feedback from us. We talked about only 28 people the
last time they were able to come up. There are many more people
that are going to be affected. Unfortunately there was only 28
people allowed to speak the last time. We were shuffled through
so fast, we got three minutes, it is very hard for us for we are
not public speakers, we have a hard time trying to convey to you
how it is going to affect us and how much is going to hurt us. I
have a house right now that I got into that I'm already looking
at $10,000 loss. Yes, part of it is the economy but the other
part is because nobody is going to move into this area. Who wants
to live next to it. I tried to make this brief and I didn't get a
chance to go over anything. Basically, please just look at it how
Page 20
.
~
it is going to affect us. There are a number of things that are
going to be going on, we have basically been deceived, shuffled
back and forth and has been put under the table. And we basically
trust the City of San Bernardino so we are the people that is
going to be affected, we are the people that live here and
support this. The development has been beautifying the area, we
know that there has been some offers to buy that land and put
more houses out there but that was snuffed out. So all we can say
is we hope that you would deny the opportunity for them to
continue this project and to try to allow more of the residential
building to help bring up some the blighted area. If you just
take a chance to look at our neighborhood and see what a lot of
good hard working people are trying to do. I apologize for
stepping over too long and I hope you........
Commissioner Lopez: No, we want to reserve it for discussion
time.
Unidentified speaker: No, No I'm saying, I understand that. We
are going to call him back up for me to ask a question. I want to
ask him a question.
Commissioner Lopez: You may.
Unidentified speaker: How are we going to do it?
Commissioner Lopez: During the discussion you may call him back.
Unidentified Speaker: What is your name?
Jeffrey Davis: My name is Jeffrey Davis, sir.
Commissioner Lopez: Jeffrey Davis.
Unidentified Speaker: I don't understand that before we been
allowed to course from the speakers, I want to make it a matter
of the record that you did allow me that right. To question the
speakers that were speaking and I don't understand why the
different format tonight.
Commissioner Lopez: You may call him back if you wish at discus-
sion period.
Unidentified Speaker: I'm asking, why the different format?
Commissioner Lopez: Because there is a lot of people that want to
listen to all of the concerns that they have. Once we get through
then we will answer every - each and everybody's questions.
Because then they are able to questions staff, and the developer
and everyone else. I mean the developer and staff will answer all
the questions. They are writing them down, they are documenting
everything that is said and then they are going to be able to
Page 21
.
-
answer all the questions that they asked.
Unidentified Speaker: They will answer my questions too.
Commissioner Lopez: Right! As commissioner you will
End of tape 2 side 1
Jeffrey Davis: and has been put under the table. And we basically
trust the City of San Bernardino so we are the people that is
going to be affected, we are the people that live here and
support this. The development has been beautifying the area, we
know that there has been some offers to buy that land and put
more houses out there but that was snuffed out. So all we can say
is we hope that you would deny the opportunity for them to
continue this project and to try to allow more of the residential
building to help bring up some the blighted area. If you just
take a chance to look at our neighborhood and see what a lot of
good hard working people are trying to do. I apologize for
stepping over too long and I hope you........
commissioner Lopez: No, we want to reserve it for discussion
time.
Unidentified Speaker: No, No I'm saying, I don't understand that.
We are going to call him back up for me to ask a question. I want
to ask him a question.
Commissioner Lopez: You may.
Unidentified Speaker: How are we going to do it?
Commissioner Lopez: During the discussion you may call him back.
Unidentified Speaker: What is your name?
Jeffrey Davis: My name is Jeff Davis, sir.
Commissioner Lopez: Jeffrey Davis.
Unidentified Speaker: I don't understand that before we been
allowed to course from the speakers, I want to make it a matter
of the record that you did allow me that right. To question the
speakers that were speaking and I don't understand why the
different format tonight.
Commissioner Lopez: You may call him back if you wish at discus-
sion period.
Unidentified Speaker: I'm asking, why the different format?
Commissioner Lopez: Because there is a lot of people that want to
listen to all of the concerns that they have. Once we get through
Page 22
.
"
then we will answer every - each and everybody's questions.
Because then they are able to questions staff, and the developer
and everyone else. I mean the developer and staff will answer all
the questions. They are writing them down, they are documenting
everything that is said and then they are going to be able to
answer all the questions that they asked.
Unidentified Speaker: They will answer my questions too.
Commissioner Lopez: Right I As commissioner you will get your
answers, your questions answered .....
Unidentified Speaker: They will answer the question that I want
to ask him, they will answer that question for me.
Commissioner Lopez: We will allow you to call him back if you
have to ask a question.
Unidentified Speaker: If it is going to take longer I don't
understand why the ........
Commissioner Lopez: Geraldine Wong. Thank you Jeffrey.
~Geraldine Wong: My name is Geraldine Wong, I live in the Verde-
mont area and I have a lot in common with Ms. Antanasova, I as
well moved into an area that had a ------ problems and I've met
with Mr. Henry Empeno and James Penman in the City knows very
well that I have put a great forth of effort into community
services and problems. Unfortunately our problems have not been
resolved yet. The last time I was at the podium was with respect
to the transfer of toxic waste rebel station and fortunately we
won that. It seems to me that there is always something that
someone wants to put into Verdemont. Which brings to mind some-
thing Esther Estrada said to Tom Minor about an adult book store.
Well why don't we put it in your ward everything else goes there.
I don't think it is funny, you know. I'm here today because my
son is asthmatic. I moved into this area unaware of the winds,
they do blow up to a hundred and ten miles an hour. The last two
winters have been extremely calm due to the fact that winds are
caused by air fronts. And I would like Mr. Hogan to speak expli-
catively on this issue. Address what I am saying. Okay I When you
have storms you don't have the winds. And if you have done any
studies in the last two years you are to see as to what our wind
factor is. Ah, the first three winters that I was their, we
literally had wind from October to March, consistently. I cannot
fathom that there was any piece of modern equipment that can deal
with that issue. And my son is on an nebulizer three times a day.
He has to take pregnenolone, he takes things that are steroids,
they're harmful to him. He has to take these things because he
lives in a windy area. He cannot attend school otherwise because
he cannot breath. I can only look at your facility and doubt what
you have to say to me that it won't affect him further and the
Page 23
,
.
a
particles that will enter his lungs as mentioned earlier by two
speakers ago, it is true. And I can only feel that there is no
alternative but for me to move my family. I've gotten him on a
controlled program through a Loma Linda Hospital facility and
this doctor is an infamous respiratory pediatric specialist.
without him we would have had to move. We can't move because our
property have depreciated not just because of the economy but
because you're building a dam up above us, we have to get flood
insurance now, and there is all sorts of factors on how come our
properties are depreciating. I have to say, maybe Calmat did a
nice job in Mission, whatever but it does not have the wind
factor, this is an extremely unique area and it must be analyzed
as such. And I do think farther away from the residentss it is
fine with me, but not down wind from where I live. Because it
will force me out of the area even if I have to take a loss and
rent to take my son from the area and I hope you have compassion
in your heart for that because it is the truth.
Commissioner Lopez: Stewart Cumming, give us your name and
address. Craig Henderson, Frank Atencio, and Clarence Hudson.
S~8Wart Cumming: Stewart Cumming, 4377 North Cristy Avenue, San
Bernardino. Good evening Mr. Lopez, members of the commission.
I'd like to take a second to thank MEG/Associates for the wonder-
ful job they did on the supplemental report. I think it was a
real good piece of work. To kind of get away from the emotional
aspects that some of these people and address some of the issues.
Calmat has told you that they are bending over backwards to
accommodate the City. Yet, in the area of their quality, there is
an issue that I've yet to hear brought up and that's the fact
that a special health risk assessment is required by SCAQMD for
this project. Because it is a potential emitter of toxic air
contaminants i.e. Silica Dust, as identified by the Air Quality
Management Control District. Currently, neighboring jurisdictions
also require special health risk assessments of similar projects
in their jurisdictions, yet this jurisdiction has seemed fit to
ignore the fact that there is a potential emitter of toxic air
contaminants asking for an application to build a plant which
could potentially admit toxins, right in their neighborhood. You
don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand that here in
Southern California we have the worst air quality of anywhere in
the world. And here is a project where we know we cannot mitigate
a negative impact air quality and you're thinking about approving
the project. That's hard to fathom in today's day and age.
Additionally, theories and essential species and biological,
their projects contains many flaws. MEG/Associates has pointed
out most of them and I doubt that any of them are totally mitiga-
table. The Riversidian and Sage Scrub habitat is extremely dwin-
dling and I don't care how good your re-vegetation plan is, no
one has ever successfully re-vegetated Riversidian and Sage
Scrub. It just hasn't happened. And I doubt that it ever will.
Lastly, not lastly, but in addition, the mitigation and the
Page 24
.
~
monitoring program of 84 possible mitigating and monitoring
measures in their program, only 8 are controlled by outside
agencies. Twenty-nine are controlled by Calmat and city agencies,
and forty-seven of the monitoring and the mitigation measures are
left up to Calmat. That's kind of like asking the kid to watch
the cookie jar. I don't really think this is in the best interest
of the city and the residents of San Bernardino. Lastly, I would
like to refer to a study done by Market Profiles out of Costa
Mesa that was hired to research the possible industrial and
financial development in that area. The area they studied was
right where Calmat wants to put its main pit. 400 hundred acres
Southwest of Cajon Blvd., Northwest of Cable Creek Channel,
Southeast of Institution Road, East of the Santa Fe Pacific Line
near Verdemont. (~ima) Can I have a few seconds to finish this?
(speaker: finish your point) Basically, project demand for this
area in way of commercial and industrial development is not
sufficient. Their conclusions were that there is sufficient
demand for affordable priced housing in the area to override
specific objections to the site. Currently they said given the
weak industrial market in San Bernardino and weak site character-
istics the project would not be recommended by their firm. And
industrial construction in San Bernardino County has been mainly
concentrated around Ontario International Airport. Here in the
City of San Bern - or East San Bernardino Valley, only about 4 or
3\ of industrial development is occurred up in this area. We're
faced in this City with an area, Norton Air Force Base, which is
right for development, right for bringing in jobs to the city.
Unfortunately, we can't develop everything at the same time, we
need to concentrate our efforts in this City where they will be
best for the most residents and the majority of this city. Calmat
and Cajon Creek project is not in the best interest of the
majority of the City of San Bernardino. It's in the best interest
of Calmat. As you've seen here tonight a small cadre of union
members. Thank you very much for your time.
Commissioner Lopez: Craig Henderson, Mr. Henderson, Clarence
Hudson, Linda Elliott.
Craig Henderson: Hello, my name is Dr. Craig Henderson, I live at
4597 N. Bronson, in the City of San Bernardino. You have already
heard about air pollution, noise, and water pollution and traf-
fic. You have already read that these may be reduced but they
still will be problems and cause damage. I live 800 yards from
the proposed mining and asphalt processing area. I have fears
about my family's health and so will anyone else who moves there.
I think that it is ironic that the City is trying to attract the
Defense Department Accounting Center with 4,000 jobs, with the
people there who will want quality housing. And where is that
housing being built? It is being built in the North end of San
Bernardino. The City must decide whether to make the North end
undesirable for housing and therefore, damage our chance for the
Accounting Center. I would urge you to vote for homes and for our
Page 25
~
.
health and against the Calmat project. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Next, give us your name and address please.
Clarence Hudson: I'm Clarence Hudson, I live in the Cimmaron
Ranch project. The one thing that really troubles me is that the
Calmat had this property, what, 1985, and yet the Planning
Commission knew their plans and then allowed housing to be put
there. Something is wrong with the thinking there. I mean it just
doesn't make sense to put a giant dust bowl next to houses. I
hate to insult anybody, but like I said at the last meeting, I
smell a rat, and I can't say it no plainer than that. I mean the
physical evidence alone with just the wind, the road conditions,
I mean those roads aren't even near adequate to just take the
need of just the residents there, you got a two lane highway, no
under passes, no over passes for seven miles. Like somebody
previously stated, you get a train or two coming in the opposite
directions, those truckers aren't going to wait. Those guys are
getting paid by the load, and they are.not going to be on the
hour. They get - setting there for the hour you know they will
set there all day long. I would, you would. I think there needs
to be a lot of rethinking. I'm all for jobs, I'm fortunate and
blessed enough to have one now. We can take Calmat's project and
relocate it. Another gentleman stated he drives an hour and a
half, I drive about the same distance back and forth to work. We
all have to do what we got to do to maintain our lifestyles. Move
that plant an hour and a half out in the middle of the desert.
Utilize the rail system. You can utilize the highways too, make
it a lot safer for everybody. I think that the whole project
needs to be scrapped and rethought. We should just utilize our
resources in a positive role. To you Commission members, you guys
got to honestly rethink this, I don't know if any of you have
been out to the Cimmaron Ranch project, and up to Devore, and
Verdemont, but you got to go and see what we as a community are
trying to establish out there. You don't want to build your house
next to a cesspool. I don't think any of you people here live in
those areas. If you do you probably, you know, standing over here
where I am. You folks need to jump on a bus and come on out
there, break bread, we can have a block party or something, who
cares, but you guys need to come out there and see with your own
eyes instead of viewing this paper. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Frank Atencio, Frank Atencio, give us your
name and address please.
Frank Atencio: My name is Frank Atencio, I live at 20201 Fifth
Avenue. About jobs, the Sand Company is not going to create any
big amount of jobs like Ms. Dubay said. Now, the industrial part,
that might be fine, but we do not need a big pit in the wash. I -
There is a lot of animals in there, they got Eagles that come in
there every spring that come off the hill and feed there, but
like this man from the Public Relations man, from San Diego, he's
Page 26
,
~
telling us that this is good, I live there. I live within two 200
yards of where they are going to put a rock crusher. That means
that sand and asphalt plant. That means that they are going to
have ---, I'm positive that that's got to be illegal, to work
seven days a week, wake me up at 5:00 o'clock in the morning. Put
me to bed at 9:00 o'clock at night, plus feeding the crushers all
night long job. That's going to be going on right next to you,
right next to me. I went out there and cleared five acres of
brush, built a house, with my own two hands, took me ten years, I
got it done, now they want to put a crusher right next me. This
isn't way down the street, this is directly North of me, 200
yards, a crusher and an asphalt plant, with 1,500 trips a day.
It's unbelievable. The man from Rancho Cucamonga come up and said
that was a fine job, that's what they need. Well Rancho Cucamonga
on the end of Etiwantda they refused the same thing. They didn't
want it in Rancho Cucamonga. The noise, I don't see how I am
going to be able live there with just the noise, let alone the
asphalt. The smell of the asphalt plant, the dust right off the
shakers, there is no way you can stop that. They are going to be
bringing this 20 ton loads of (asphalt) load after day all night
long. It's almost is impossible to live there. In fact, I don't
see how I could. Nobody has ever come to talk to me. I know the
wash better than most people. They tell me that there is going to
be less dust. Well a month ago, the wind was blowing, it was
before the rains, from my house down below whereCalmat had
worked, there was a dust storm all the way down Highland Avenue.
From above there was brush, the grounds not been broken, I have
no dust. I don't care how hard it blows. It is just going to
change, when you break the ground you take the brush off, its
going come and I believe it is illegal to put anything that close
to me and ruin my piece of property, plus the lights all night.
It might illuminate my property, all night long. So that is where
I stand, thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Linda Elliott and then Mr. Castronovo, and
McCann, P. McCann. Go ahead please.
Linda Elliott: I'm Linda Elliott, from 893 Kenbark Avenue. I live
on the hill just above, in Devore. I've got a few concerns, ah,
we were talking about school buses, let me explain what school
buses are in Devore. We have a local school there, but its a
magnet school, it draws children in from the whole community,
outside of Devore. So many in fact, that many of our own children
have to be bused back down the hill into other schools, as well
as our Junior High and high school kids. The Devore bridge
probably, over the freeway there at the 215, probably sees 30 to
35 buses going by everyday, every single day. Now this bridge is
also suppose to be shared by several hundred trucks are may be
even thousands, they gave us these fantastic numbers of these
huge trucks that are going to be going over full and coming back
empty, back and forth. We are concerned about this for the
children. We are concerned because this two lane bridge, even if
Page 27
-
~,
,
-
it's made four lane, it doesn't take much to block four lanes of
traffic with an accident. These trucks are going to be a danger
going through there, along with the school buses. The other thing
is, setting up there in the hill, we only have two ways off that
hill. We have Kenwood and we have the Devore Road bridge. We are
in a fire area because of these winds, because of the dry area.
Not this year, its true, not at least until maybe August or
September when all of this rain is caused the weeds to grow as
tall as your house. But things are going to get dry and we are
going to be back into a fire hazard area. We have a fire station
right across the freeway from us, all we need to do is have that
Devore bridge blocked so that the fire trucks can't get to us,
and they would have to get on the freeway, go to Palm, go under
the freeway, get back on again, come back past Devore Road, go to
Kenwood, get on Kenwood and come on a two lane mountain road back
around and then back down Devore to get to the fire, if there was
an accident on that bridge. Same thing would happen if there was
any other kind of emergency. Have we, have we looked at this
closely enough. Because this may seem, I don't know we just seem
like a few houses up there, we're not very big, we're certainly
aren't a multi-million dollar business, but we are American
owners of our own homes. This multi-million dollar corporation
we're talking about here its major stock holders, Japanese, they
don't care who we are or what's happening. They only care about
making money. They say they are going to be giving us lots of
jobs and the joke is the status symbol of the 90's is to have a
job. But if they are going to give us jobs don't put our children
and our houses and our homes in danger. Look at this project
really carefully. We won't be down wind from it up there on the
hill but I know that coming all the way down here when the wind
blows you guys are going to know that Calmat's digging up the
road. So will Riverside, because we know how the wind blows. We
just want you to be aware of all these, there going to be digging
on an earthquake fault that whole area is just riddle with it.
Have we looked into that carefully enough to know that we are not
going to be cause some really serious problems. I hope I covered
a couple of things, there's many-many other things that I would
like to talk to you guys about but look carefully at this project
again and make sure it's for the best of our community. Thank
you.
commissioner Lopez: Next speaker please. Give us your name and
address please.
J.E. Castronovo: My name is J. E. Castronovo, and I live in
Devore. I heard someone mention here about American dream, owning
a home, having a family with a good life. Of course, there is
also the American nightmare. I'm sure many people have heard
about the Love Canal. Let's talk about Calmat. My specific area
is going to traffic, noise, pollution, of course they are going
to control the noise pollution on site. However, Calmat just
doesn't deal with just the area that they own and just the
Page 28
~
,
~
property that they have. Noise pollution with trucks is enormous.
The exhaust, the noise from one truck is probably as loud a truck
- a train passing by. So I can imagine now Calmat is projecting
1400 trucks per day till 1997, and increasing that slightly to
1650 per day to the year 2000 and then beyond that we're talking
3250 trucks a day, for noise pollution in this area. How about
air pollution? Imagine the same trucks, 1400 and on up to 3250,
since they don't have the special ah, what they call them, the
catalytic converters these are open pollution to fuel, of oil,
converting it to toxic chemicals which is spewed into our air and
it's not spread just on Calmat property. It is spread allover
the County of San Bernardino and any other area that they have. I
don't see how Calmat is going to mitigate this at all. Then we
finally have infrastructure damages. will this City be financial-
ly responsible for the increase deterioration of our County and
State roads due to the excessively of 85,000 pounds per truck,
multiplying 85,000 pounds per truck by 1400 trucks per day, times
350 days per year, and you will have excessive deterioration of
State highway which comes out of my tax dollar and my pocket, and
Calmat doesn't pay me a dime for their mining operation. Thank
you.
Commiaaioner Lopez: Mr. McCann, Darcee Klapp, Valerie Henry,
Suzie Lamb.
Mr. McCaDJ1: My name is Jim McCann, I also live in Devore. See all
these fine union folks out here with the job signs. Nobody that's
in our position to the Calmat's project wants to stop jobs. We
want jobs like everybody else. Today, what I am doing, I am
working as a skydive instructor for a living and just managed to
get here in time so I'm a little bit disorganized. Most of the
jobs that-that we think of are not going to come from this
counter project or any associated industrial development that
goes along there. That's where the beauty of the Norton Industri-
al part comes too. What's ideal for this area is something other
than a counter project that's going to already pollute, that's
going to pollute the air more than it already is. I have here ah,
and all of this is from October issue, the Sun sort backs up the
figures that have been given to you already, that show demograph-
ically now where the jobs actually do come from in a large radius
around this area and they don't come from Calmat or the associat-
ed industrial things that they are talking about. For you folks,
if there are any construction workers here, when you build the
houses you want people to move into. Do you care what is going to
be like once that house is built and the buyer moves into it like
the ministers talk here. Or do you just build and move onto
something else and don't give a rat's rump whether the guys going
to move into a house that is polluted or not. The traffic we
talked about, and that's going to be there, what else is going in
this area is an amphitheater up in Glen Helen Park. Within the
first year of operation we are talking about 50 or more concerts
a year that is going bubble sort up way beyond that. What is
Page 29
<
~
going to be the primary ingress and easiest route to the Glen
Helen Theater, it is going to be Cajon Blvd. The same area that
basically all these trucks are going to be running on taking the
aggregate out. I had a big, I wish I could show you tonight my
wife made- made a day after the first real set of rains we had
this year, and you could just see the blowing dust from the winds
coming down the Cajon Pass. Half the time, that wind is going to
blow things up the Pass, towards Verdemont and Muscoy, Devore,
etc. The rest of the year, it is going to be blowing down hill
allover the fine folks of San Bernardino. Everybody wants jobs,
everybody wants development, but we can't do it at the cost of
our own enjoyment of the area that we have. I've said it before
and I'll say it again, it's a very nice city emblem that we have
here but if you want to put this in, we've talked about nine
hundred thousand to a million gallons of water we are going to
use, so you might as well take out all the nice peach groves
there because there is not going to be enough water to support
that. And you have a nice Arrowhead here, you can't see that half
of the year now, you put this kind of thing in there and you
might as well just spray that over because the pollution is going
to keep you from seeing all the rest of it and finally take the
oxen out from behind the covered wagon there and put a bunch of
bull in - bulls in there because that's what the passing of this
project really is. Thank you very much.
Commissioner Lopez: Then we have Valerie Henry, Suzie Lamb,
Violet Hart.
Dareee S. Klapp: My name is Darcee Klapp I'm at 18500 Arrowhead
Blvd. in Devore. I'm here and I think all of you for opening to a
public hearing to be able to hear our concerns, we do thank you
for that. Our town is a very small town. We are all of sudden
bombarded by first of all a AMPM in our Devore track, then an
Amphitheater, and now Calmat. It is a very beautiful area, it is
a very rural area. We are concerned that Calmat has expressed
that in their letters that they will guarantee us not to use
their bridge, not to use our Devore bridge, for the trucks, their
trucks. That does not include all the independent truckers. Our
bridge is only two lanes. Our fire department is on the South
side. If something happens and a truck is stopped, we then are at
risk with our fire department and our emergency services. Keep in
mined, it has been said by Calmat that our Devore bridge is not
an equestrian bridge. Devore is an equestrian area. You have in
front of you the letter that I received from the Department of
Transportation, dated May 15, 1992. It is by chief freeway
operations, Seiran Kwong. It states that yes, Devore is a very
sensitive equestrian area, that yes, the Devore bridge is a
equestrian dedicated bridge. That the equestrian comes first
before the trucks. Then I also have the staff report from the
AMPM mini-mart. They in their staff report had to, was demanded
by Devore and complied, that they put a trail in front of the
AMPM to comply with the dedication of the equestrian trail. I am
Page 30
.....~
,
-^
not saying that horses take the place of jobs, but what I am
saying is this is a balance that needs to be considered and that
is, if this project has to be voted on and that vote is yes,
which we don't want, please force Calmat to spend their precious
money and put an off ramp and on ramp on Bennit. That is in the
middle of Cajon that would not impact anybody, except right
there, their industrial. That is just a suggestion. That is not
what we imply but is a suggestion for Calmat. We have met several
times with Calmat they know our stance, they know we are in
serious opposition to us. Again, thank you for your time.
Valerie Henry: My name is Valerie Henry, I live at 967 Knoll
Street in Devore. I would like to talk about the rock plants
around the surrounding areas. Is another rock plant really
necessary, we have several in the area already. I'd like to read
a list of the rock plants that surround the purposed Calmat
concrete plant. Calmat on Highland Avenue, Al Rock on Riverside
Avenue, Holiday Rock on Baseline, Fourth Street Rock is at Fourth
and Foothill, Seal Ferris on Boulder, Robertson's on Alabama,
Calmat in Colton, Hinnigon on Rancho Avenue in Colton, Yeager -
which is a re-crusher plant, Crush Masters in Fontana which is
also a re-crusher plant, Heckick ---- in Fontana, Fourth Street
Rock in Rancho Cucamonga, Calmat in Upland, Holiday Rock in
Upland, Blue Diamond in Upland, Calmat in Corona, Seal Ferris in
Corona, Corona Rock, Mobile Sand Company in Corona, Al Rock Star
Plant on Santa Ana Canyon, Al Rock Proto at Highway 71 and 91.
I've just read a list of over 20 rock plants that fall within
approximately 30 minutes of the purposed Calmat plant. There are
many other rock plants, both in this area and the high desert
region. One thing is certain, there is no shortage of rock plants
in our area. One plant on the list that is extremely close to
Calmat project is the Al Rack - excuse me, the Al Rock Plant on
Riverside Avenue. This plant is approximately two miles from the
current Calmat plant on Highland Avenue. During a construction
boom in August of 1990 Al Rock shipped over two hundred and
thirty-nine thousand tons of material out of their plant. That
equates out to over 9560 truck trips. If you ask any nearby
resident they will verify the fact that the traffic was absolute-
ly unbelievable coming out of that plant. If the Calmat project
generates that kind of traffic and Calmat has said that it will,
can the area really handle it. After being told ten years ago
that Calmat's Highland Avenue plant had over 50 years of materi-
als still left to be mined, I wonder why Calmat would want to
sell or close the plant and open a new one nearby. Mr. Doug
Sprague told us at one of our recent DRPA meetings that 90% of
the material from the proposed plant would be shipped to the Los
Angeles area. If this is true why isn't 90% of the material from
the current plant on Highland Avenue being shipped to L.A. If 90%
is slated for L.A. why do we need the plant here, why not locate
it closer to L.A., or better yet, why not reopen the old Cajon
Rock plant. It is located on the old Highway in Cajon Pass. There
is easy access to the freeway from Cleghorn Road or Kenwood
Page 31
,
,
-
Avenue. There would be very little impact on the surrounding
communities, it is very few residents live near the old Cajon
Plant. The traffic would be on.the old highway and not in the
middle of our communities. There is many other alternatives to
this project being placed in the Cajon Creek Wash. I urge you to
explore all of them before you make a decision that could be a
major impact of several surrounding communities. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Thank you.
Suzie Lamb: My name is Suzie Lamb, I live at 1197 Marion Avenue
in Devore. The community of Devore is situated in the foothills
of the San Bernardino mountains with numerous vistas and view
points of the Cajon Creek Wash and the surrounding valley. A
majority of our homes are on view lots which overlook the pur-
posed project site. Due to the elevation of the community the
purposed project will have substantial negative asthetic affects
on the character of the existing open space and rural residential
areas. This purposed development will almost completely obstruct
the view from Devore and the surrounding area. At this time the
development surrounding the purposed project area is large
residential lots with some commercial along Cajon Blvd. Creation
of a project, such as this, strongly departs from the character
of surrounding development, and is a significant impact to our
community. The community of Devore is an area which must be
considered a sensitive receptor due to its rural residential
nature. The purposed Calmat's project will represent a substan-
tial change in the current open space of the Cajon Wash. Purposed
reclamation and re-vegetation of area P which is the deepest pit
purposed at a 125 feet will not restore this area to its previous
condition. The alteration to the land form will be permanent and
will create an asthetically offensive site open to public view.
Along the upper portion of Cajon Blvd. the purposed project would
include zone changes to light and heavy industry. This would have
a substantial negative asthetic affect with respect to visibility
from Glen Helen Park and to Glen Helen Amphitheater users. The
heavy industry would be closest to the park with only the Cajon
Creek Wash to buffer it. I ask that you review the State CEQA
guidelines for asthetic impact and evaluate all areas and views
with respect to these mandates. Please keep in mined that the
Gateway from the North is the Cajon Pass. Will deep pits that
alter the land form and heavy industries that pollute the air
give the best first impression for the City of San Bernardino.
Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Terry Fergason, Shirley Thurmond, and Susan
Enkosky, go ahead mam.
Viole~ Hart: My name is Violet Hart, I was born in San Bernar-
dino, I'm a twenty-three year resident of Devore. I am very
concerned about the liabilities here and I think that a good look
at the defacement of the land in the Highland Campus area of
Page 32
,
~
Upland would tell you that this is not a very good idea. That is
poorly fenced, it is accessible to children, anyone can enter it.
Poorly posted, and if that's what reclamation is, if they were
promised that they didn't get it, so I would really, would not go
for this at all. If they want to put the millions up front in
trust for reclamation I'm might consider that. Also, the ah
problem of health hazard, and that is a very serious thing, we
have a fungus spore which is very hard to pronounce. It's Kock-a-
dee-o-ee mycosis or San Jaun Valley fever, or is it rheumatism
valley fever. Now this is a very life threatening disease. It is
so life threatening that in this last month they have posted
warnings on the television, Kern County is epidemic, L.A. is
epidemic at this present time and Bakersfield has now on the
television on Sunday. I'll try to get this to you. This is a
fungus that entirely gets your whole body. It can affect the
brain causes anemia phlebitis lung trouble, nervous system and
this lung can reoccur. It can go dormant and come back or it can
reoccur from a new spore, this coming from the dust of course.
Now, this spore being air born in the dust we have danger with
the traffic. Now they're talking about keeping the dust in this
place, there aren't saying about all these trucks, are they
covered when they travel. They are talking about Bakersfield,
alright, you just go through there, they say its passing this. On
top of that, this morning, on Sunday, 4000 cases in the last 18
months half the residents tested positive that have been tested.
The medication for one month $700 for a prescription. A severe
case last six months or better. Now this is a responsible thing
you've got to face. Also, its defacing, the traffic situation is
conflicting where they're talking about stacking the traffic on
Old Cajon for the functions at the Amphitheater in Glen Helen
Park. It conflicts with your own prosperity and very negatively
to San Bernardino City, County, and someone has to be liable for
all of this, and I'd like to know City Council, Calmat. Thank you
very much.
Commissioner Lopez: Terry Fergason
Shirley Thurmond: My name is Shirley Thurmond, I live at 2230
First Avenue in Muscoy, and proud of it. And if that land out
there is full of garbage its because the people in San Bernardino
and around go out there and throw a lot garbage at night, throw
it on our streets, dump their dogs and their cats and we've all
wished they'd stop. Anyhow, while I was outside this evening
earlier, I talked to a lot of the fine people here with the job
signs on, I asked them where they were from. About 10% were from
San Bernardino. Some of them believe that it will bring jobs here
maybe somewhere else, I don't think they will leave here because
they have to go work. I don't think they will live here but that
is inconsequential to what I have to say. I would invite you to
drive down Highland Avenue to Rialto some afternoon when the wind
the is blowing really hard. That's Calmat's operation and slip
and slide on the gravel that's on the right hand lane and try to
Page 33
-
see. And that's a small operation compared to what they are
talking about. When the wind gets up to 50 miles an hour if rou
have hoed your backyard in this country you know that there ~s
going to be dust. And they are talking about big holes. We've got
people who are so scared that their property is going to be
worthless that they are ready to leave and I don't blame them.
I'm too old, I can't. The traffic will be so - you can't stop
people from going up and down Cajon to work, from work or inde-
pendent truckers and I think the people in business in Cajon are
going really be hurting because, that's too heavy of traffic for
Cajon. Also, the kids ride their bikes up and down Cajon. Those
big trucks it takes them for every and year to stop. Kids wait
for school buses on Cajon Blvd. The safety factors involved in
this, I don't know, they say we shouldn't vote now, you know, we
can't blow our smoke in anybody's face, I smoke, and I'm sorry I
smoke. But what they're asking - Calmat is asking to do is to
come to my house, my grandchildren and put their smoke in their
face. All the residents out there, they say come on you breath
our dust, if you die it doesn't matter. We all want to see people
work, but we all want to live. We are proud of where we live, we
think we should have the right to live and we don't think a big
corporation, you know, on the pretense of getting people to come
out that they are all going to get a job and whether they are
paying people to come or whatever they are doing doesn't equate
to our children's lives and our grandchildren's lives and I thank
you for listening to me.
Commissioner Lopez: Thank you. Terry Fergason, Susan Enkosky,
Brian Biedebach, Jane Hunt.
Brain Biedebach: I'm Brian Biedebach, I live at 3194 Macy Street
in Muscoy. I've lived there since 1963, I've seen a lot of good
things happen, a lot of nice housing developments out there next
to the, it was the State College, and now its the University.
However, putting in a company that is going to be creating dust
day and night with the wind blowing down from Cajon, everyday it
blows, sometimes it blows harder than others. But putting a plant
there that is going to be creating dust 24 hours a day is going
to make life unbearable as far as going outside, opening your
windows, ah trying to have a good clear view, its bad enough with
the smog, you can look from Muscoy and see the smog problem at
San Bernardino. To be able to look out and see the mountains is
ah privilege in Muscoy because we always have that wind coming
down from the pass. With this plant, we won't see the mountains.
All we will see is dust, sometimes heavier than others and
probably smell it too. Plus the exhaust fumes from the trucks
hauling the sand and gravel out. Now, they say they have made a
beautiful thing out of Mission Valley in San Diego and I use to
live in San Diego, and before they developed it, it wasn't that
bad. However, to compare a valley with the gently sloping plateau
that comes down from Mt. Baldy, is absurd. There is a geological,
I mean a geological, a huge geological difference there. This
Page 34
.
.~
gently sloping plain that comes down from Mt. Baldy is one of the
few areas left in Southern California that nurtures the Yucca
Plant which is one our plants on our emblem, on our San Bernar-
dino emblem. You can see the two Yuccas on each side of the sign.
To have a plant displace these plants is .....................
EHD OF TAPE 3 SIDE 1
Brain Biedebach: ....blowing down from Cajon, everyday it blows,
sometimes it blows harder than others. But putting a plant there
that is going to be creating dust 24 hours a day is going to make
life unbearable as far as going outside, opening your windows, ah
trying to have a good clear view, its bad enough with the smog,
you can look from Muscoy and see the smog problem at San Bernar-
dino. To be able to look out and see the mountains is ah privi-
lege in Muscoy because we always have that wind coming down from
the pass. with this plant, we won't see the mountains. All we
will see is dust, sometimes heavier than others and probably
smell it too. Plus the exhaust fumes from the trucks hauling the
sand and gravel out. Now, they say they have made a beautiful
thing out of Mission Valley in San Diego and I use to live in San
Diego, and before they developed it, it wasn't that bad. However,
to compare a valley with the gently sloping plateau that comes
down from Mt. Baldy, is absurd. There is a geological, I mean a
geological, a huge geological difference there. This gently
sloping plain that comes down from Mt. Baldy is one of the few
areas left in Southern California that nurtures the Yucca Plant
which is one our plants on this - on our emblem, on our San
Bernardino emblem. You can see the two Yuccas on each side of the
sign. To have a plant displace these plants is profit money over
nature, it's plain and simple. Also, it houses - it's the home,
this 775 acre area that want to dig up, has - been - it's ah -
the home for the desert tortoise, the California desert tortoise
which is one of the few remaining areas which this Tortoise
thrives in. And we have to save it, we have to save it for the
plants and the animals. And the people that live down wind from
it, Muscoy in particular and San Bernardino will be getting it
too. Thank you.
Commiaaioner Lopez: Jane Hunt, Leeona Klippstein, Bill Mattison,
give your name and address please.
Jane Bun~: Hello, my name is Jane Hunt, and I live at 2305 Second
Avenue in Muscoy. And ah, excuse me, I'm not feeling to good, I
was home from work today. Ah, but I had to make it down here for
this. Ah, everything that's, I had a speech prepared but since I
walked into the building and found a group of people, I kind of,
I became emotional, I know that is a bad term to use now days,
and I'm taking it personally because I've lived out in that area
for - since '65, and I really think, I beg you to turn down this
proposed project because I think, well everything that has been
said about it before me has been true. It would be bad for the
environment, and its not going to create jobs. I'm for jobs too,
Page 35
.-
,
.
~
but I consider the environment people too. I consider all those
factors and I really think the land could be put to better use by
turning it into an agricultural area maybe or turning it into a
nature reserve which would help the citizens of this community
become better acquainted, like children, becoming aware of the
environment that we have left here to preserve. It would make
them better citizens in this community if they were seeing a
connection between the environment and the land. I'm speaking for
the land which can't be, they can't speak for themselves, the
animals and the plants. I really beg you to turn down this
proposal and turn the land into a better usage like maybe rural
housing, or small farms or something like that, or nature re-
serve. I think it would be better and more appropriate for the
community and the County. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Thank you.
Susan Enkosky: Hi, my name is Susan Enkosky, I live at 787
Kimbark Avenue in Devore. I'm here tonight to talk to you about a
major environmental concern that I don't think the ERA - the EIR
has addressed. Environmental reports are very necessary and vital
in order to protect the rare and endangered species. And I was
wondering if the EIR has addressed the species of fungus that
grows in this region that causes a deadly disease of Kock-o-cee-
o-dee mycosis. This disease is also known as Valley fever.
END OF TAPE 4 SIDE 1
SPEAKER UNKNOWN FORM TAPE 1 SIDE B: ...control the noise, and
there is very many kids that live on my block that plays outside
and they will no longer be playing if this does pass. Thank you
very much.
Commissioner Lopez: Thank you.
Jeff Wright: Hi, my name is Jeff Wright, P.O. Box 2341, San
Bernardino, 92406. I am going to present a group of questions
which I would like the panel to answer at some point and time,
Planning Commission, and preferably tonight. But if not, if they
could document their answers and I'll pick up a copy of that.
First of all, though, it's the aerobics portion of our meeting
tonight, how many of those are opposed are undecided where they
stand on this issue. Please stand up, we had the people who are
for it.....
Commissioner Lopez: Ah, Mr. Wright!
Jeff Wright: Yes! Well Mr. Sprague was able to that at the
beginning of the meeting and I think in fairness to the people
who came down here who were opposed that we have a right to be
represented.
Commissioner Lopez: Mr. Wright! Mr. Wright! I am going to have
Page 36
~
you address the commission and not the audience.
Jeff Wright: wait a minute, this is my public speaking and you're
interrupting me during my time.
Commissioner Lopez: We're the ones that make the decisions, not
the public, we make the decisions.
Jeff Wright: Well, Mr. Sprague got an opportunity to do this and
I want to restart on my time then. Can we restart please, he
interrupted my three minutes. Let's hear some applause then if we
can't do the aerobics portion. Thank you. Now I want the Planning
Commission to take note that there's a lot of people who are
opposed are undecided on this project, and not be intimidated by
the people who stood up at the beginning that are from the unions
and the people that Mr. Sprague apparently invited down here. I'm
not opposed to jobs, I want to make that clear. Obviously every-
body needs to work and have some form of income. I wish that
there was an alternative rather than just a for and opposition to
this, because I want to present some alternatives. But I want to
see these implemented and done right. Not just for quickness and
to go by environmental issues, as rapidly as possible. I'd like
to also know how many of those people wearing the job signs are
from San Bernardino. I don't think that it is fair that there's
been an air here playing people's needs for jobs verses people's
needs for habitat. Such as this woman's whose child is - got
asthma. That's very adverse affect on somebody in that condition,
along with the rest of us. But especially somebody who is on the
edge like that. And also, several people brought this up tonight,
why in Cajon Creek, why not at Norton. You got two major projects
fighting it out for territory for turf. In this kind of an
economy it's ludicrous. I think one alternative that you should
consider is having some of the projects at Calmat is considering
bringing in maybe possibly done at Norton, but done right. I want
to reiterate that. Ah, as far as what they are planning on
bringing in however, with wood products, you have glues that you
have to deal with, mills, there's such things as dioxin, how are
you going to mitigate these things. Food manufacturers, there's
various problems that can be associated with that just eat at
Jack In The Box. Publishing and printing operations are these
going to be required to utilize soy inks exclusively which are
environmentally friendly or are we going to have to deal with
other types of inks and possible problems with solvents. Pharma-
ceutical Manufacturers, what are they going to do with the used
chemicals after they make the drugs and pharmaceutical there. Is
there going to be nuclear medicine done there, as far as putting
together things that ah - for fighting cancer. What's going to be
done with the radioactive material. As far as mining, I mean who
wants to take dusty aspirin for a headache. I certainly wouldn't.
What type of research and development is being planned for there
and why not at Norton. It fits research and development. What
type of product manufacturing, is it going to be environmentally
Page 37
~
friendly. Is it going to be something that will work for this
area and the services, the same question. Now as far as air
quality, are we going to deal with by trading air quality credit
to making a board game out of our lives and habitat. I hope not.
When this area is mined there's a plumes under the former camp
Ono where there is toxics. When you bring this stuff up in mining
operation, I'm sure that we're going to have airborne toxins born
on PM-10's, dust particles floating around, people are going to
breath it, some of these fungi that people have brought up
tonight are another concern. Jobs at what cost, the world that we
have, are we going to remediate the world the people dumping by
developing the planet, that makes no sense and as far as habitat
for plants, animals, and human habitat we need to consider all
these issues. Ah, and if we take this area away from endangered
species or species of plants and animals that are close to the
edge what about comparing it to the other areas. We got a patch
work now, a jigsaw puzzle, where many of the pieces are missing,
we're losing the picture, we're losing what we have and what
we're expected to pass on to the future. I have one more point to
make. I want to ask the panel, I'll ask it in the fraternal since
there is no women on the panel. But I would like to direct it at
Mr. Sprague and that's this, and I definitely want an answer
tonight on this question. What are we to tell the future when
they look into our eyes and ask daddy why is the sky brown.
Commissioner Lopez: Give us your name and address please.
Callie Kettman: Hi, my name is Callie Kettman, I live at 20201
Fifth Avenue, San Bernardino. Thank you for letting me speak.
I'll be brief. People live in North San Bernardino by choice,
they want to be rural. They don't want a lot of neighbors, they
don't want a lot of houses, they don't want a lot of buildings.
That's why we are out there. We would like to be left alone out
there. Not having all those cars and traffic and everything. I
haven't heard anybody speak about the asphalt plant. I'm not for
sure exactly how it works, but I know when you make asphalt you
have oil, you have rock and you have heat, that makes smoke.
Toxicity into the air. I'm going to be living, what, 50 yards
from this plant. Is my house going to turn black from the oil,
and the smoke and the things like that? Another thing that I
would like to address, is that, Calmat is suppose to bring a lot
of jobs but how many jobs is Calmat being in that area going to
kill? I for one will lose my job. There will no longer be a ranch
for me to work. The other thing that I would like to say is that
we are supposed to becoming environmentally aware and we need to
start doing something to save our earth now. Well, if we are
supposed to start doing this, now is the time to set an example
and stop Calmat. We have to do something and save the world, we
can't leave it for my doughter to do. Let's set an example for
other cities and take the first step towards making a better
earth for all of us to live in. Thank you.
Page 38
~
Commissioner Lopez: Robert pirrone
Victor Merojo: My name is victor Merojo, and correct me if I'm
wrong. Ah, I was born in Mexico City.....
commissioner Lopez: Give us your address.
Victor Merojo: 4504 N. Vermont in the City of San Bernardino.
Correct me if I'm wrong, I was born in Mexico City, and I immi-
grate when I was 8 years old. I went to school in the united
States and I learn that we have the freedom of speech and I think
that these people, including myself that three minutes is not
enough for us to decide what is going to happen, for you guys to
decide what is going to happen to us for the rest of our lives.
My second point is, I live in the City of Irwindale, riding back,
all those gravel pits, the streets were full of pit holes, trucks
going 60 - 50 miles an hour. I'd never seen a truck that had a
tarp, I have two cracked windshields, I have a doughter that was
born there. On the competition at school she couldn't compete
because she was developed asthma. The doctor said that it was by
what we breathe in that neighborhood. The third, overnight,
2:00 - 3:00 in the morning, we keep hearing those bells there.
They pull the gravel, the gravel from one pit hole to the other
hole, we hear them all night long. So, I left there and I came to
San Bernardino, thinking that I was going to live in peace. And I
don't think that I am going to live in peace. So, if you guys
think about this project twice, and think about our health too.
Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Thank youl Lyn and Mitch Ryder, Kathy Otter.
Go ahead Mr. Pirrone. Go ahead.
Robert pirrone: My name is Robert Pirrone, live in San Bernardino
on Gray Street, about a 1000 feet where they don't put this pit.
And I oppose it, it's nasty, I live ah, we get our North winds, I
live the south end of it, I'll get it. Industrial asphalt proba-
bly have there asphalt plant there. And it's toxic. I hauled
asphalt, I brought it up at the last meeting. I hauled it for
Ellis in the 50's, I hauled it for Natty, I hauled it for Thomp-
son Tankly, when you signed a bill says, you know, it is hazard-
ous to your health, they are suppose to have breathers. You got
to look down the tank to look at it. They have the devices but
they don't maintain them. They're stuck with grease, with smoke.
But what I really wanted to say was, is far as ah, as far as all
these operating engineers here supporting this deal, wait until
they come in like ah they did over there at Graham, Owl, they
said it was going to give jobs. Bow many jobs is it going to
give? I've been in a plant before, many of years, I was born out
in San Fernando, I belong to 420, when I was 15, 1946, I hauled
rock and sand. I worked for ah Kathler, where did haul all that
toxic stuff when we were doing the 118 freeway, we dumped it in
the San Fernando plant. Bad to get rid of it. They talk about
Page 39
. .
.
making a park, what happen to the park over there in Irwindale,
what happen to the park that's been for 60 - 70 years over there
off the San Fernando Road. I don't see no park, I don't see no
fishing. As far as I'm concerned, I mean it's hazardous to your
health. And as far as they brought up that they have a safety
deal since 1935. 1935, the only yard they had was on - in North
Hollywood on Lankenshire Blvd. - victory Blvd. They don't have no
trucks no more. They took their ready mix and the ah, what is it,
Catalina Pacific. They don't have no more, and now they got City
up here that came out of Baldwin Park, all nonunion. Please
believe me, I mean I've witnessed, I'm 65 years old, I've been
hauling this construction all my life, owned my own truck and
worked for companies. So don't then tell me that they're going to
make jobs. Just wait until these operating engineers do like they
did in the teamsters. They'll do it, they're selling all foreign
countries, they don't belong to them no more. So help me. Thank
you.
Commissioner Lopez: Thank you.
Mitchell Ryder: Hi, my name is Mitchell Ryder, I'm at 4359 N.
Cristy Avenue, Cimmaron Ranch. I'm going to address all my
comments in a form of questions, and I'm directing them to Mr.
Sprague and I wonder how many of you watched our President last
night make a lot of campaign promises just a few very short
months ago, and what happened last night when we watched Mr.
Clinton and I see Mr. Sprague up here ah doing the same type of
political philandering of which he has no control over. Just as
Mr. Clinton has no control over what goes on now. I don't know
how Mr. Sprague is going to stop the trucks from getting off the
University Avenue or Palm Avenue in the heat of getting another
load of gravel out. What might happen if the train or a bus is
coming by at that time and they start backing up, has anybody
gone over on University Avenue when the college is getting out
and get in that back up of traffic. Don't tell me that they are
going to use one off ramp that's impossible. You cannot tell
people which way to go and which way for trucks to go. Now I want
to ask Mr. Sprague if he is going to guarantee the value of our
homes. And you as the Council as you recommend to the Mayor, what
are you going to do when 400 home owners in the Cimmaron Ranch no
longer pay upwards to 25 to 3000 dollars a year taxes, Okay, to
run this City. What are we going to do then. We can't live in
those homes if we are polluted by dust, by noise pollution, we
can hear the trains now in the middle of night. I also am an
expert witness in the fact that I have been to all these rock
plants that have been spoken of as part of my job. I come in
front of you with very mixed emotions because my job is directly
related to these people, the local and everyone else here and yet
I come in an opposition of them simply because this is what we
are talking about here. It's big money as opposed to the health
and welfare of our community. Thank you.
Page 40
~
Commissioner Lopez: Kathy Otter, Carolee Kingsford, Larry Single-
ton.
Kathy ----: Hi, my name is Kathy ---- I live at 17520 Greenwood
in Devore. I was going to talk to you about the environmental
aspects, which I've given you some paperwork with some statis-
tics. But I think that ah, my time would be better spent to say
to you that all the issues that have been raised, I don't see
anyway to mitigate all these problems. This project is not even
close to being ready to be approved at this point. And I would
think that since you just got a document yesterday with more
addendum's which the public has not even seen yet, how can you be
ready to vote on this project. How have you had time to review
this project at all, with new documentation just in one day. I
would hope that you would refuse this based upon all the things
that have gone before and especially on the environmental aspects
which cannot be fixed. Thank you.
Carolee Kingsford: Good evening, my name is Carloee Kingsford,
and I reside at 668 Woodlawn Avenue in Devore. I'm also am a
property owner in the City of San Bernardino. The Cajon Creek has
been for many'years, recreational area for equestrian, bicyclist
and hikers. Cajon Creek is also a wildlife corridor between the
Angeles National Forest and the San Bernardino National Forest.
In 1989, the County of San Bernardino spent $100,000. to identi-
fy, evaluate and implement an open space element for our area
that was badly needed. In July 1991, the County adopted this plan
into their general plan. The Cajon Creek was noted to be a major,
major importance. Also the Southern California Associations of
Government identified a number of areas, within our County,
outlying these areas and saying hey, these are the ones, these
are the important ones. And Cajon Creek again, was identified and
mentioned. The general plan takes a very specific stand on
important habitat on private land. It says, and this is a direct
quote, "To address the issue of specialized habitat occurring on
private lands, this opens space element as well as other imple-
ments in the general plan contains a variety of policies which
address the need to regulate private activities which could
adversely affect the open space resources of all types." Unquotet
Policies dealing with resources limited to specific region's are
also contained in this open space. It is quite obvious that
protection's have been put into place to protect this area from
indiscriminate development. I would like to read you a definition
of open space as it applies particularly to Cajon Creek, which
includes the area from the Santa Ana River to Mormon Rocks. There
are several types of open space to be described. The County
describes Cajon Creek as a natural open space. An open space for
recreation, and open space for scenic resources, and an open
space for health and safety. You notice that there is no mining
mentioned there, and that is a type of open space. Cajon Creek
supports a native fishery and contains significant riparian and
woodlands. The Least Bell's Vireo habitat exist in this area.
Page 41
-
Also habitats for endangered plants have been found in this area
and support the Santa Ana River speckled dais fish. By the State
of California the State feels that all fish supporting streams
within the County are rare and worth protection. Animals, includ-
ing large mammals, like bears and deer regularly disperse across
the San Bernardino and Angeles National Forest. Cajon Wash is an
open space of substantial importance and should be maintained as
a habitat area of a wildlife corridor. This is not an emotional
plea, this is all in this plan which I will leave with you. One
of the major reasons California has been so desirable is it's
natural beauty and recreational lifestyle. But the quality of
life in California has been deteriorating. We all know, everyone
in this room knows someone whose said, I am getting out of here.
It's getting insane. Decisions are being considered which will
adversely affect our environment and our air and our traffic for
the rest of our lives. The Calmat project has yet to mitigate
affectively any of the above concerns. As you can see everything
is in its place to help protect this area. I would like to
request that the Commission and the Planners of the area of San
Bernardino, deny the Calmat project as being inconsistent and
they are inconsistent with the State, and County guidelines for
this area. I'll leave you a copy of this information and I also
have a copy of the demographics we talked about earlier and this
is based on a 7 mile radius area in San Bernardino. And where
most of your jobs are as per public record of the Sitcom Industry
book, it's not at Calmat, it's going to be with your retail and
your office spaces. The kind of development you've already
started.
Commissioner Lopez: Your time is up, thank you. Larry Singleton.
Larry Singleton: Hi, Larry Singleton, 26944 Messina, San Bernar-
dino. Ah, first of all where is the Calmat Corporation registered
and is it in Delaware and where do the state taxes go? I was kind
of curious about that. Ah, first of all, I grew up in San Bndo.,
I kind of wrote this up real quick. And I have to ask you when is
enough-enough. I see your signs, let me feed my family. Where
were you when my job was being taken away by illegal aliens and
out of state workers. If you're truly serious, and I mean if
you're serious about jobs, instead of making an effort to further
destroy the quality of life in the Inland Empire, go and camp out
on a construction site, okay, where there are undocumented
workers. How many of you individually, okay, you people here you
know, with the signs and all that stuff, your little tags, have
written to your local paper or questions politicians on this
subject, personally. Not too many. The Calmat is here to mine for
building materials I'm assuming, I don't know that much about it,
but what means development, which means growth, and I can say
from personal experience and nothing good comes from growth.
Okay I Also, Calmat is here for Calmat. It doesn't take a genius
to figure that ah your presence here is obviously a propaganda
tool. Like I mentioned before if you're truly serious about jobs,
there are many other alternatives. Rather than destroying what's
Page 42
.
.
.
left of our countryside. I grew up in Devore, by the way. To me
personally who has seen San Bndo., go down the toilet, this is
just another example of the land raper mentality. And any of you
Calmat people who remember or knew what San Bernardino use to be
like ought to be ashamed to be taking part in what is a effort to
further destroy California's quality of life. We are over devel-
oped. You know, it's that simple man, we're to the max. They're
taking up every nook and cranny of our foothills right now. I use
to be in construction, okay. And you know the reason that I am
out of it, if I could find another line of work so can you.
Commissioner Lopez: Is there anyone else that I haven't called
that wishes to speak in opposition of this project. Anyone else
that hasn't spoken that has been sworn in that's want to speak in
opposition of this project. Yes mam, come forward.
Be~~y Chadwick: Hello, my name is Betty Chadwick, I live at 2874
West June Place in Cimmaron Ranch. I really want to just bring to
your attention since nobody has brought it up yet that is body
picked up from the Planning Department this little yellow book-
let. Because in here which I would assume that you folks are
somewhat responsible for, it very clearly designates our area as
a high wind hazard area. And when I wanted to build a patio cover
according to this book, structures must be designed to resist a
110 mile an hour winds. Now this makes it very clear to me that
the Planning Department is well aware of the severity of the
winds up in this area. And that I find it incomprehensible that
anybody, perhaps God, but other than that could possibly control
dust or any kind of blowing material within the kinds of winds
that we do have. And I can also point out that prior to moving to
San Bernardino two years ago, I lived in San Diego for four
years, and there, no way is there any kind of wind conditions in
San Diego, that remotely resemble what we deal with here in San
Bernardino. So, like you said, I picked this up on the second or
third floor in this building gentleman, and it's very clear that
you are all well aware of the wind conditions that we have to
deal with. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Thank you. If there is no one else to speak
in opposition, yes....
Bruce S~ephen: My name is Bruce Stephen.......
Commissioner Lopez: Have you been sworn in?
Bruce S~eph.n: Yes I have. Address is 18570 Grand View Avenue in
Devore. priorities in life is # 1 family, # 2 businessmen, I
believe in profit, I believe in the free enterprise system, I
believe in jobs. But there are a couple of concerns that I have.
I am against this project. The main one being that # 1 with the
wind, gentleman, you have no idea the wind out in Devore, at 60
miles an hour and we're talking maybe 100 miles an hour. You come
page 43
.
-
up to my house and we'll have coffee sometime when the wind ~s
blowing and then we'll go outside and then we'll say we've got
all the high tech equipment to control mother nature. Common
sense would state this will not take place. Just trust me on
that. . 2, the other concern that I have is the businessmen,
industrial buildings, ah commercial buildings in the area. You
know University Parkway, you folks have lots out there still for
sale, okay. And there they are going to develop this, they may be
have a unique program but we can't even develop that area out
there off the University Parkway. And, we are going to bring more
industrial buildings, more commercial buildings does not make
sense. So I just want to heed those two, I don't, I'm going to be
short on, that's what I have to say. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: If there is no else to speak in opposition,
yes, come forward please. Give us your name and address.
Clifford Hart: My name is Clifford Hart, I live at 18168 Hill-
crest Drive in Devore. There's a couple of issues that haven't
been touched on, and one of them is the water. All of San Bernar-
dino, Colton, everybody down this way gets a lot of water.
They've got tanks, and I can set in my house and see about 12
tanks. Everybody uses water out of the Devore Creek. Nobody talks
about that. Nobody even mentions the fact that all these trucks
that are going to dump diesel fuel, all kinds of oil, contaminate
the water. Nobody even thinks about that. That's fine. They got
so many contaminated water wells in San Bernardino now, they have
to come up the hill to get water. They just slimmed them with it.
What is the matter with you people, you want to contaminate the
entire Valley's water, something's wrong with you. They gonna
build this big thing in Glen Helen Park, hey, we got to have
septic tanks. Well, how are we gonna do it. How are we gonna keep
it out of the water. Somebody come up with a bright idea to tell
the engineers hey, we got a big fault, earthquake fault, nobody
has mentioned the earthquake fault. But we got one there. And
they know right where it is. Put it over on that side, put it on
that side of the fault and it won't come this way. The our water,
how about Rialto, how about the other people down there. It's on
that's side, we're not worried about them. You people ever think
about something like that. It don't just, it got features to come
through there. How about these people that is gonna do all this
digging. They're gonna dig in through that fault, hey, here comes
the damn sewer, right over where it's not suppose to be. What are
you going to do about that, think about it. Somebody in this
group in this Planning Commission has agreed to set up this
septic tank, huge. You've got all these people that are going to
come and see these concerts and all, so right away, they say we
can't build it that big to begin with, we'll have to have these
outside privies that line the whole thing, you know. But as it
grows we're gonna have to build something else. It's too damned
expensive to give - ah sewers - to far to go we can't run it that
far. Think about those things fellows. You knew about the septic
Page 44
.
.
.
tanks, I know, you proved it. Somebody did, may be not the City,
but the County, whose got that up there now anyhow. Is it the
City, County. Okay I Well anyhow, your going to try to take it. So
take that whole problem with you please. Thank you very much for
your time.
Jacquelyn Whitehead: My name is Jacquelyn Whitehead, I live at
2724 Rosiretta Street, Cimmaron Ranch track, in San Bernardino. I
use to live in Fontana in an unincorporated area. There were no
sidewalks, there was no backyard, there was 60 mile an hour
traffic on my street. After multiple wrecks on my corner they
never put in another stop sign set, so that it was still a two
way stop. I've held bleeding babies. Ah it was a terrible place
to live for me. And I couldn't let my children play outside. They
had to either stay in the backyard or when the wind blew they
stayed inside. If anybody has ever had two toddlers inside for 12
hours they know it's not fun. Now, we live in Cimmaron Ranch, we
have a gorgeous home. I have four kids now, I have a 12 year old
chronic asthmatic. The last time I spoke at the June 16th meeting
I made a plea for him because he had gotten so ill during one
particular wind storm. Now I have two, almost 4 year old twin
boys, along with my two older children. On windy days I can't let
them play outside because they blow over. Not to mention the dust
and dirt in their eyes. Your asking me to think about the good of
San Bernardino. I'm thinking of the good of San Bernardino. I'm
looking at a beautiful housing track that can only bring up the
value of San Bernardino. I'm looking at the taxes we pay, the
revenue we bring to the City of San Bernardino. I'm looking at
the fact that not once have I heard mentioned in any of the
reports that we are not an incorporated area. We are Cimmaron
Ranch, City of San Bernardino, and yet everybody talks about us
like we're not there. I don't understand that, not when I look at
my tax bill. I want my children to play outside, I want them
safe. I want to be able to live in my home for a long-long time.
I don't believe a lot of the propaganda that Calmat has put out,
because I talked to the man myself several times, and the jobs
that he was talking about your talking about a 25 year period.
There are not going to be 11,000 jobs the day they open their
plant. I just want all of you to consider if you lived where I
live, if you waited 15 years to buy a home that you planned on
staying in forever, would you vote yes on this project? If you
lived in my house and have the view of mountains that we have now
and you thought this is going to be home. Would you vote yes on
this project? I don't think so. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: I am now...........
Barbara Sky: Hi, Barbara Sky, 6464 Palm Avenue. Ah, I wasn't
going to speak this evening because just about all the issues
have been addressed except their is a couple that I would like to
bring to your attention. I live on Palm Avenue, and I think the
traffic study that they did is very inadequate. It didn't address
Page 45
. .
.,,"'
the 814 additional homes that are going into Verdemont. It didn't
address a shopping center that you changed the general plan on a
couple of months ago which I believe is about 30 acres. And it
doesn't address Institution Road that the last few rains have
washed out. The people that work at the Sheriffs facility park
their cars on Kendall and Palm and the helicopter flies out,
picks them up and flies them in. That's the only way they can get
in and out, and no mining has taken place yet. The Redlands
bridge, they are blaming that on some mining activity from taking
too much soil out. They diverted the water into a different
channel and it washed it away. Right now the people that live
into the park, Glen Helen Park are completely cut off from the
outside, or they were last week, because the Devore bridge was
gone. So, they were having to use Institution Road. And when it
washed out, they were completely shut in. Now the people at
Verdemont realize what this is to be shut off from the rest of
the City because, before the City put 4 million dollars worth of
infrastructure in, we flooded all the time. Now it's twice as
bad, after the 4 million dollars. I'm a union contractor, and I
can relate to a lot of the people here. I'm also a grandmother,
and I think that is the greatest joy in this world. And I would
not take a job, and I would not do it if it was detrimental to
the health and safety of my kids or anybody else. And I think
they would all agree with me right here that they're not going to
take jobs that are going to be detrimental to someone's health.
And I would like to say, if any of you people have gotten into
the documents and looked at it, step back a minute and take a
look, because you are being told to be here tonight and know the
reason that your are really here. Your not going to get jobs from
this. How many jobs are you going to get. You may get some truck
driving jobs, but when the industrial comes in your not going to
get much work. This is also going to be a redevelopment project,
it's in the documentation. They are going to try to make the
whole project redevelopment. That's not going to give much
revenue to the City of San Bernardino. And it also is going to
pay for all the infrastructure of Cajon Blvd. Well if these
people are going to come in and they're gonna be a hardship on
us, make them pay their own damn way, because I don't won't to
pay it, because we just had to pay for an assessment district
that by rights the developer should of had to pay a long time
ago. And, they didn't address the Amphitheater in the documents
on transportation. I set on the Amphitheater committee for the
County, and we were told three weeks ago that the CHP and Cal-
trans, says all traffic will come off of Palm Avenue, and they
will use backup on Cajon Blvd., and when they have a hdndred
thousand at concerts, they intend to go traffic down Institution
Road. And I don't think this has been addressed in any of the
documents. So, I suggest that you tell these people to go back
and do their homework. Thank you.
Commissioner Lopez: Yesl
Page 46
.-
.
,
.
Ken Kingsford: My name is Ken Kingsford, I live at 668 Woodlawn
Avenue and I go to a school in Rialto, Trap, and right now I only
study 2 to 3 days out of the year. We are on smog alert and we
can't go outside. If the mining did go in we couldn't go outside
at all, except for maybe one or two days. And if that happened it
might get a little boring. So that's all I have to say, bye.
Commissioner Lopez: I'm now going to close the public hearing.
And I'm going to request that the applicant respond by topic to
the concerns raised. Ah yesl Okay, let's take a 5 minute break.
We will back here in 5 minutes. END OF TAPE 1 SIDE B
Commissioner Lopez: Ah, we are going to get ready to bring the
meeting back to order.
Uniden~ified Speaker: Just let me remined the commission that at
11:00 ah we need to take a vote to see if you want continue.
Commissioner Lopez: Could we get the applicant? I also want to
remined myself and also the Planning Commission members to speak
into the microphone, so that the people in the back can hear, and
so that we have all the comments on tape.
Uniden~ified Speaker: We have the applicant they're willing to
respond to the ..... of interest. Reminded that we also have our
consultants here, who may have questions too.
Mr. Sprague: I'd just like to note that this ah environmental
process has been going on in terms of public input since I
believe ah August of 1990 when we submitted the project. And ah,
we've found it very helpful ah having public comment express
their concerns because this is the way I think that we've arrived
at a adequate EIR. Because the ah, the ah, impacts that the
public has voiced"here, we've heard before, ah in 1990, we've
heard again and again throughout this process. And ah, in terms
of developing the EIR and this project we've tried to address
these issues and we think we have. Ah, I'm going to list a number
of issues that, and I'm sure I'm not going to hit them all, ah
but I'm going to do my best in the short period of time. In terms
of those issues, major issues that are addressed in the BIR, ah,
for example noise, the City has standards which we will meet. Our
operations are not for 24 hours. Dust, we are required to control
dust. Wind, we can't control the wind but we can certainly
understand it which we are trying to do right now with our
monitoring station to understand it's frequency, velocity, wind
direction. The aesthetics were reviewed in terms of aesthetics
ah, project impacts, ah and so forth. These were reviewed by the
peer review group. Traffic, in terms of the projects handling the
traffic ah, ah we're doing, as part of the project we're doing
street improvement, intersection improvement, signalization, all
sorts of things to handle the traffic that our project generates
as well as factoring in traffic ah, ah from increase for seeable
Page 47
.
,
,
.
.
uses in the area, which would include the amphitheater. In terms
of water, water quality, that's been addressed in the EIR. In
fact, ah as a condition we have ground water monitoring wells,
two of them at our site. We are both proposing those. Terms of
geology and faults, we know this is an area that's laced with
faults and the project is designed so that no structure for human
occupancy are located on those faults. That's a requirement of
the Alquist-Priolo Act. Terms of biology, the peer review, a
group analyzed the biology very carefully, they may have some
comments in terms of its adequacy but they found that the EIR was
adequate with regards to its assessment and mitigation's. In
terms of land use compatibility, that was analyzed in the EIR.
Ah, let me just make a few more comments on some of the specific
issues that were raised with regard to jobs. Our analysis of the
job generations of this project, and we're talking over 25 year
build out. We're not talking about instantaneous, tomorrow,
nothing is instantaneous in this world. But essentially we
forecast 6400 jobs on site, 4600 jobs off site from our industri-
al development over that build out, now that is an estimate. Ah,
in terms of the need for sand and gravel, the State, back in the
early '80's assessed the San Bernardino region under a program
called classification designation. They looked at the need for
resources into the future for this region as well as the supplies
that were available. And they identified the Cajon Creek area as
being as part of the resource that was needed for future need.
Now this is the State that identified this and essentially did -
designated the Cajon Creek area, ah as a significant mineral
resource for sand and gravel. Terms of truck routing, its a
permit condition that our rock trucks use Palm Avenue. An Addi-
tional safeguard is that we're required by the City to come in
with a truck routing plan that will show how our trucks will ah
leave the plant and access the freeway. So, in terms of whether
our trucks will use that or not the answer is yes, or they won't
haul for us. Ah, protection of the Cajon Creek Wash, this was
mentioned many times, and in fact ultimately over half of the
project will cover Cajon Creek Wash. Which, essentially is all of
the River sitting habitat ah that is of concern to residents,
that will be protected as open space. Ah, in terms of comparison
of Calmat's promises with Clinton's promises ours are in writing.
Their in writing in a specific plan, there in writing in the
conditions of the permit. So, if we make a promise with regards
to what this project will do in terms of design, landscaping
design, ah environmental controls, mitigation's measures, these
are in writing. We have a mitigation plan that is part of the
EIR. And basically, this is what we will follow. In terms of
reclamation, how ah how we assure reclamation, today, reclamation
is bonded. If we disturb an acre of ground we have to bond for
the reclamation of that. In the old days, in Irwindale, that was
not the case. Calmat, Cajon Creek is not Irwindale. It's 1990's
technology, it's 1990's urban planning. It's not Irwindale, it's
the future. And in terms of our reclamation it's required every
year that reclamation is inspected. And at that point if we're
Page 48
.
~
-
not doing what we are supposed to do, ah we're cought. So in
terms of will reclamation occur here, the answer is yes because
it's bonded, there's money there to assure that it will and
number 2 it's inspected. Ah, I'm sure I've missed ah some of - oh
- ah, in terms of the valleys spore ah or valley fever, this was
not raised by the health department in the environmental review
process as being significant. Ah, well I think I've made a shot
at it and I'm sure there may be some ah questions are areas that
I've missed. ah!
Commissioner Lopez: No! The public hearing is closed. Commission-
ers you can ask any questions that you'd want answered. The
applicant is here now is the time to ask the questions or any
discussions, any comments you wish to make.
Commissioner stone: Yes, some comments were made previously to
the significance of the two railroad tracks very close by. What
is that significance exactly?
Hr. Sprague: Actually, there are three main lines ah, Southern
Pacific, Union Pacific and Santa Fe, and the significance is # 1,
it is a very unique combination in terms of the property adjacent
to that which allows ah, ah, manufacturing, shipping concerns to
utilize three railroads as well as the intersection of the 1-15
and the 215. So in terms of a transportation hub ah the Calmat,
Cajon Creek Site in particular the Northern area which is slated
for industrial development is a unique site in Southern Califor-
nia from the stand point of being a rail freeway hub.
Commissioner Stone: Are there accesses or do you anticipate
accesses to the railroad their?
Hr. Sprague: In terms of utilizing them, yes.
Commissioner Stone: Are you going to be transporting aggregate
materials or whatever on the railroad or no?
Hr. Sprague: In terms of mining initially ah our transportation
would be by truck, but since rail is close and since over time we
_ we anticipate that there will be restrictions on truck traffic
on freeways just because of freeway congestion, that ah ah rock
could ultimately move by rail. I should mention that the market
for sand and gravel is local. Ah, ah we look at the San Bernar-
dino market as being the market for Cajon Creek in terms of
reserves left at Highland, ah those are limited. The figure was
thrown out of 50 years, we do not have 50 years of reserve at
Highland Avenue.
Commissioner Stone: Where do you anticipate some of your product
to be going?
Hr. Sprague: It will be in the local, well it will be in the San
Page 49
,
.
.
Bernardino region. Ah, 20 mile - 30 mile radius something like
that, but essentially in the San Bernardino area.
Commissioner Lopez: Is that all Mr. Stone, Mr. Ortega and then
Mr. Valles.
Mr. ortega: Yes, I have a question in the ah, is there something
that's not written down, like you say, you follow the - you
follow your own rules, they're written down, you know as their
written. But if there is something that comes up that concerns
the people around your area are you willing to compromise. Ah,
rewrite your rules, and conform to what the people want.
Mr. Sprague: This was one of the reasons why we're intending to
have a community ah ah committee made up of residents ah in the
area. Our belief that the best way to solve problems is ah a
dialogue between the residents or those folks that have the
problems in ourselves. And ah that, that committee would be a
forum for those things. We've done this in other places ah, on an
informal basis, sometimes on a formal basis. Our feeling is in
this case it's best to have it on formal basis. And in terms.
Commissioner Lopez: Ah, please, we didn't interrupt you. You had
your chance and please, no comments from the floor. Go ahead Mr.
Sprague.............You had your three minutes, I'm sorry. Go
ahead Mr. Sprague. He is attempting to answer all your concerns
and your questions that you raised at the public hearing. Well he
is attempting to do it, if you will please recognize and ......
you had your turn and we respect the time that you had. We didn't
interrupt you when you were speaking. Go ahead Mr. Sprague. Go
ahead.
Mr. Sprague: Ah, I'm finished with responding to - take his
question.
Commissioner Lopez: Mr. Valles, go ahead.
Mr. Valles: Yes, Mr. Sprague. Since you brought up the issue of
ah traffic and you are going to be dependent very heavy on the
traffic recognizing that there is no rail spur for the utiliza-
tion of ah rail to export the commodity that you will be produc-
ing there or extracting. I'm concerned about the fair wear and
tear on the arterials. Primarily Institution Road, Devore, as
well as Palm. Ah, what factors have you considered that those
arterials will be able to withstand the traffic that is antici-
pated as well as the other traffic that is anticipated in the
park or in the entertainment area there.
Mr. Sprague: I believe the EIR looked at the ability of the roads
in the area to handle the traffic generated with regard to the
amphitheater ah there EIR ..........
Page 50
.. '...' ....
'.
Mr. Valles: Excuse me, I don't think that you are answering my
question. Of course they can handle traffic, but for how long.
Are those arterials with ill sustained the fair wear and tear
that is going to cause on them and how - for how long will they
be able to of use to anybody, including your own. That's what I'm
talking about. There's wash outs continuously in that area simply
because of floods. Now if you are going to be embarking on a
heavy congestion of traffic how will those arterials be able to
withhold, now I understand the freeway on both sides, Devore as
well as 1-10 can handle it, but that - that connector does not.
And another, I believe that is an issue that you have to address
as at some point and time if your going to be using Cajon Blvd.,
I believe there is a railroad track there. What happens on the
plight that comes by, are you contemplating overpass, underpass,
has that been addressed.
Mr. Sprague: Yes, it has. The ah, if you look in the EIR, there's
a intersection designed for that particular intersection. Ah, we
recognize that there is a rail crossing there, we've designed the
intersection to handle traffic that would stack up there until
the railroad goes by. So that has been looked at and addressed in
the EIR. ' .
Mr. valles: Looked at and addressed.
Mr. Sprague: In terms of ah design for intersection improvement
which we would have to build.
Mr. Valle.: Identifying problems is one thing, addressing them is
the same, a solution to how do you solve that so called problem.
Mr. Sprague: It's part of our conditions.
Mr. Valle.: Now, can I jump into another issue since ah made
reference to ah, monitoring the wells as well as monitoring the
landfill for gas - for gases, ah monitoring is - my definition is
to look into and discover it, assess it. But what will happen
once you discover contamination in the wells.
Mr. Sprague: In terms of the landfill the County has a number of
monitoring wells both up - up gradient and down gradient and it
is there responsibility to monitor those in terms of migration of
methane gas, we have responsibilities to look at that when we
develop the adjacent properties. The ground water monitoring
wells that we have purposed are that will be part of the project
ah to monitor ground water in our excavation's ah will be just
that, to monitor the depth of the ground water as well as the
quality. Ah, our operations ah do not involve chemicals, there
essentially just digging material out of the ground so we don't
anticipate ah, ah, ah contaminants from our operations. In fact,
at our Highland Avenue plant we have been mining there for
decades, with water wells both up gradient down gradient and the
Page 51
"
". --~ .
'..
water purveyors in the area have looked at the project and looked
at the history of their water extractions in the area and they
had no problem with our operations.
Mr. Valles: Just to follow up on that little argument. I don't
want to go into a - discussion or debate on that particular issue
but it still is not addressing us to how you intend to solve the
problem if you find contaminants. I recognize that one gallon of
petroleum product doesn't matter if it is diesel, gasoline can
pollute, can contaminate up to 176 thousand gallons of water. Now
how do you address that. How do ..........
Mr. Sprague: We have a legal responsibility..............
Mr. Valles:.......if you identify it and you discover it but then
what.
Mr. Sprague: We have a legal responsibility if we find that the
ground water is - if there is contaminants in the ground water to
report that to the water quality. Ah, board.
Mr. Valles: Report itl
Mr. Sprague: That's right I And that triggers a whole series of of
requirements of of assessing the ah ah degree of contamination
and coming up with a solution to mitigate it.
Mr. Valles: Mr. Chairman, recognizing that we have approximately
12 minutes before we are ordered ah, I at this time cannot vote
for this particular project because there are too many moving
parts - there are too many unanswered questions.
Commissioner Lopez: I'm going to ask you again please your just
prolonging this when you applaud that way.
Mr. Valles: There is a question of the risk assessment that has
not been addressed. There is a tremendous amount of issues that
bottle forth, of recent issues by the County and unfortunately ah
I guess they came about in responding ah by addressing a note to
us dated this date, and may be those concerns were brought forth
simply because of the recent storms that we've had. Had not the
storms come about I don't know how we would have addressed these
particular issues in the future. Once this thing, the certifica-
tion of the EIR is agreed to and past by the Councilor excepted
by the Council, that's one of the reasons why I say, there are
too many moving parts, there are too many unanswered questions
and I at this time am not in a position to vote. And I recognize
there's a lot of my ah ah, friends out their in organized labor
that I know I'm disappointing you but I can't in good conscious-
ness vote for something that I cannot really see the entire
picture.
Page 52
I. "'i-' ....
~.
Commissioner Lopez: Is there any other comments or questions.
Commissioner Romero: Yes. Mr. Chairman, I have a question. Ah,
yes, the problem of the asphalt, is that - can that be contami-
nated into the air or is there some kind of control in your
asphalt plant. That was one of the concerns of the audience.
Mr. Sprague: Yes, the plants are controlled in terms of emissions
of the smoke that you see from an asphalt plant. It's just - it's
steam. Ah, there very tightly regulated in terms of emissions in
bag houses and those sorts of things. In terms of order that's
also controlled. In another words, emissions from an asphalt
plant are controlled.
Commissioner Romero: Is that monitored on daily basis or within
the system itself.
Mr. Sprague: Yeal It would be monitored.
Commissioner Lopez: Any other comments?
Commissioner Romero: That's all I have.
Mr. S1:one: Mr. Chairman I
Commissioner Lopez: Mr. Stone.
Mr. S1:one: At this time I would like to move that we extend the
hearing for 30 minutes.
Commissioner Lopez: All those in favor extending the for 30
minutes.
Uniden1:ified: What's the purpose.
Mr. S1:one: The purpose of that is that we are required to adjourn
at 11:00.
Commissioner Lopez: All those in favor of continuing the meeting
for 30 more minutes, say I. Can I have a show of hands please.
Uniden1:ified Speaker: I'd like to continue for 30 more days.
Commissioner Lopez: We are going to continue this hearing for
another 30 more minutes after 11:00, to 11:30. Any other comments
or questions.
Uniden1:ified Speaker: I have a couple of statements. I went to
the plant in Mission Valley and I saw what they had done over
there, where they mined, they tore up the land and then they
recleaned the land where they now have hotels, they have shopping
centers, and I feel that we can do that if we just condition and
Page 53
.-
.-
~ ,~- ~
~
ah just make Calmat do all those things that we could end up with
the same type of improvements to this area. As you go to that
area right now, that's Cajon Blvd. is to narrow. That has to
improved, that has to be widened. The site has been designated by
the state as a significant sand and gravel resource. The site is
currently designated as (IE) Industrial Extraction. What the
specific plan would do, it would amend the land use elements of
the City of San Bernardino general plan and rezone portions of
the site presently zoned for mineral extraction and allow for a
mix of heavy and light industrial. Development and open space
uses of appropriate areas of the site. The Calmat Cajon Creek
specific plan 90-01 guarantees that Cajon Creek project will meet
both environmental and citizens complaints and concerns and
needs. For the specific plans calls for policies that will
include monitoring wind, controlling dust, meeting noise stan-
dards, redirecting truck traffic off residential streets, re-
claiming mine land and monitoring ground water and quality, air
quality levels. The plant provides standards for project aesthet-
ics such as: buildings and landscape and design. It ensures
conservation of wildlife, habitat in the Cajon Wash. Specific
plan, regulations require the reclamation and re-vegetation of
the area as mining occurs. 480 acres of open space and natural
wildlife habitat will be set aside and be protected at the
beginning of the project. Public access to this open space will
be provided by hiking and equestrian trails. Currently there is
no open space set aside to conserve, protect native habitat. The
specific plan regulations and guidelines will prevent piece mill
development which leads to mismanagement and abuse of natural
resources as this is happening today.
This project, this isn't the first time we had a public hearing
on this project. And I'm - I feel - I feel comfortable that
Calmat, the Planning Department is going to achieve all the goals
and there going to follow all the regulations and the standards
that will be required of them. So I'm going - I will ask for a
motion in a second, please, Mr. Cole.
Hr. Cole: I have a question for the staff. I'm not an expert, nor
do I think all those people out there are experts. That's why I
want to ask that we bring in some professional to review and
listen to - are you satisfied that they have convinced you
that ---not audible. I'm asking the staff.
Hr. Sprague: Yes I believe that we are in terms of the question
that you asked in the environmental issues. I think it is pretty
clearly outlined in the find of the EIR on all issues.
Hr. Cole: I'm not about to try to fool nobody.
Commissioner Lopez: Go ahead Mr. Cole.
Hr. Cole: I'm not an expert in the field. I have to take the word
Page 54
-,
."""'2ft
" .., -~
-..
from an expert. Now I hoping that the staff did an aptitude and
confided in these people and hopefully they have concurred with
you that this should be approved.
Mr. Sprague: Our staff recommendation is a recommended approval
on these regulations with the EIR with mitigation's monitoring
the program as outlined.
Commissioner Lopez: Ah, Mr. Boughey do you feel that the final
EIR now meets the CEQA requirements.
Mr. Boughey: In my opinion, yes it does.
Uniden~ified Speaker: Mr. Chairman.
Commissioner Lopez: Yes!
Uniden~ified Speaker: I'd like to ah make a motion that we
approve specific Plan 90-01 General Plan Amendment, 91-18. The
Development Code Amendment number 92-06 and the Conditional Use
Permit, number 91-31, be approved with a condition........
Commissioner Lopez: Please
Uniden~ified Speaker: With a condition...........
Commissioner Lopez: Please
Uniden~ified Speaker: that the City Council looks at this traffic
problem and addresses it before they give the final approval.
Uniden~ifi.d Speaker: Mr. Chairman, before you move and second it
ah, would you take a look at page ............
Uniden~ified Speaker: Mr. Lopez!
Commissioner Lopez: Yes!
Uniden~ified Speaker: Mr. Sprague made a statement that didn't -
that is opposition to what was said in this publication given out
by the ah Chamber of Commerce. That statement Calmat would have
pharmaceutical operation which will include chemistry.
Uniden~ified Speaker: This will have to go in as part of your
motion.
UDid.n~ified Speaker: Mr. Chairman. If we can't have order I
would move to adjourn.
Uniden~ified Speaker: I concur with that.
Uniden~ified Speaker: We have a staff floor motion, in the staff
Page 55
t" ~ ~
~
recommendation.
Unidentified Speaker: I have, I have a point of order.
Unidentified Speaker: Just a second, through the chair Mr.
Chairman, I believe Commissioner Traver brought up an interesting
point and I don't think we heard him, at all. Could you repeat
that Mr. Traver.
Mr. Traver: I think that that's part of the discussion that's on-
going right now, then Mr. Boughey is going to speak to Mr.
Valles.
Unidentified Speaker: The staff recommendation is the on the
staff report page 14 and 15 would be those ten actions of approv-
al as required for various portions. Does your motion include
that?
Unidentified Speaker: I didn't spell it out but I would like to
amend my motion to include the recommendations items 1 - 10.
Unidentified Speaker: We can read those for the record if the
Chairman so choose.
Unidentified Speaker: I still have a point of order.
Commissioner Lopez: Mr. Stone.
Mr. Stone: Ah, did I understand the motion correct when he said
we were going to direct the City Council to ah do something.
Basically ah require them to set up some kind of a monitoring
system or something on this program.
Uniden~ified Speaker: No, my motion was to make sure the City
Council addresses the traffic problem before they give final
approval of this.
Mr. Stone: I don't believe we have the authority to require the
City Council to do anything.
Unidentified Speaker: You can always make a recommendation to
Council.
Unidentified Speaker: Do you feel they you should look into
something, be absolutely.....
Mr. Stone: The word require is what I'm having a problem with.
Unidentified Speaker: Well I will amend it that recommend it that
they address this issue. Because it, as the commissioners here
have that real - have the problem of addressing it ourselves. We
want them to make the final decision on that.
Page 56
~
<~~
~ ~ ~
~
Unidentified Speaker: Is there a motion on the ten items. I'll
ask Deborah to read them into the record.
Deborah Woldruff: Staff recommends that the Planning commission
recommends the Mayor and Council that:
1. Certification of the Environmental Impact Report which
includes the DEIR, FEIR with Addendum and Technical Appendi-
ces.
2. Preparation of the Statement of Overriding Considerations
based on the appropriate findings pursuant to CEQA.
3. Approval of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
4. Approval of General Plan Amendment No. 91-18 subject to the
findings of fact (Contained in Attachment 1)
5. Approval of Development Code Amendment No. 92-06 subject to
the findings of fact (Contained in Attachment 2)
6. Approval of specific plan No. 90-01 subject to the findings
of fact (Contained in Attachment 3 - A) and conditions of
approval (Attachment 3 - B) and standard requirements (At-
tachment 3 -C)
7. Approval of conditional use permit No. 91-31 and reclamation
plan subject to the findings of fact ( Contained in Attach-
ment 4 -A), and conditions of approval 4 -B, standard re-
quirements (Attachment 4 - C)
8. Approval of tentative parcel map No. 14106 subject to the
findings of fact (Contained in Attachment 5 -A) and condi-
tions of approval 5 - B and standard requirements in 5 - C
9. Approval of tentative parcel map No. 14107 subject to the
findings of fact (Contained in Attachment 6 - A) and condi-
tions of approval (Attachment 6 - B) and standard require-
ments (Attachments 6 - C)
10. Approval of tentative parcel map No. 14106 subject to the
findings of fact (Attachment 7 - A) and conditions of ap-
proval 7 - B and standard Requirements 7 - C
Correction to that motion would be that the revised conditions of
approval that are contained in your staff report and those would
all be referred to as, let's see, I think it is Attachment B 1 -
5.
Unidentified Speaker: Mr. Chairman, minor correction in 10, she
spoke of 14106 and it's 14108.
Page 57
r ~ ,A
-
Deborah Woldruff: It's Attachment, I'm sorry, approval of tenta-
tive parcel map No. 14108, it's on item 10, and number 9 is No.
14107 and 8 is 14106. I might of misstated them.
Unidentified Speaker: I'll second
Commissioner Lopez: Second, no comments.
Unidentified Speaker: Discussion
Commissioner Lopez: Go ahead Mr. Stone.
Mr. Stone: There has been an awful lot of testimony given tonight
on environmental impact reports and things of that nature. Ah, we
sitting as this board have the discretion to exercise our obliga-
tions. We have a number of obligations that we have to look at
besides the documented EIR's and the things of that nature. We do
have the discretion to approve or disapprove a project based on
other areas. We have an obligation to the investors of other
industrial projects the City of San Bernardino right now has an
over abundance of industrial and commercial zoned projects. We
have some of them in bankruptcy. We have brand new buildings
boarded up because there is too much industrial activity going on
right now. The general plan for the City of San Bernardino was
built with an excess of industrial and commercial zoning in it
because we recognized the need for jobs in San Bernardino, but
just the industrial or commercial zoning does not guarantee jobs.
That doesn't create any jobs at all. Ah, one of the problems that
I see that we've had in the City of San Bernardino is that we
have a bad tendency not to look out for things that have already
started here. We have a number of industrial projects, the State
University and in fact we have some redevelopment areas their in
bankruptcy because they can't generate enough taxes to sustain
themselves. Now we are going to create another one. We have an
obligation to do what's best for the Muscoy area. The best thing
in my opinion to happen to Muscoy since Muscoy was ever Muscoy,
was the Cimmaron Ranch development. If there has been anything to
upgrade the Muscoy area it has certainly been the Cimmaron Ranch
development. I feel that this Calmat Project is going to drive a
stake right into the heart of that whole effort. Who we have an
obligation to the general citizenry of the City of San Bernar-
dino. We have another - a long history of creating jobs for
quality of life. I would suggest the Lockheed thing at Norton Air
Force Base, regardless what you choose to call that it's an
aircraft junk yard. We have an obligation to do as much as we can
to increase the quality of life for the people around the Norton
area as well as the area in Muscoy. I think it is time that we
exercise our obligations to the citizens of San Bernardino and
not to some company that comes in here that want to take advan-
tage of our resources and deteriorate our quality of life. I feel
that we have enough problems without adding more problems to what
we already have. For that reason I am not going to support this
Page 58
. ,.-
.
... ..
~
project.
Commissioner Lopez: No other comments, questions.
Mr. Cole: You know, I noticed tonight there was a lot of people
was saying they was driving that hour an a half. I think - I
moved to San Bernardino there was no smog, they had new houses,
no traffic, beautiful. Then all of sudden all of the people moved
in from L.A. and they started driving back and forth and here
come the smog. Most of the smog that is created in San Bernardino
is from the freeway, people driving into L.A. to work and living
out here. Now, they told me it was for progress. I except that, I
mean, I moved to a country town and now its growing. I think that
we ought to be able to understand that. I think that nothing - I
think that was one of the worst places in the world build some
houses, right next to a railroad and a freeway. Now I live in the
middle of all of this and I live as close to Calmat's plant on
Highland as I do a railroad. Now guess which one I hear at night.
END OF TAPE 2 SIDE B
Mr. Stone: I feel that we have enough problems without adding
more problems to what we already have. For that reason I am not
going to support this project.
Commissioner Lopez: No other comments, questions.
Mr. Cole: You know, I noticed tonight there was a lot of people
was saying they was driving that hour an a half. I think - I
moved to San Bernardino there was no smog, they had few houses,
no traffic, beautiful. Then all of sudden all of the people moved
in from L.A. and they started driving back and forth and here
come the smog. Most of the smog that is created in San Bernardino
is from the freeway, people driving into L.A. to work and living
out here. Now, they told me it was for progress. I except that, I
mean, I moved to a country town and now its growing. I think that
we ought to be able to understand that. I think that nothing - I
think that was one of the worst places in the world build some
houses, right next to a railroad and a freeway. Now I live in the
middle of all of this and I live as close to Calmat's plant on
Highland as I do a railroad. Now guess which one I hear at night
at 3:00 o'clock in the morning, not Calmat, but the railroad
sliding the wheels. So I can't understand you buy a house right
under the railroad and become concerned about noise and pollu-
tion. I don't understand that. Because to me, the worst thing to
have a house close to, would be a railroad. Now Cimmaron built
houses right under the railroad. If I had of been on the Planning
Commission at the time I probably would have voted against
building houses that close to a railroad. That's what the problem
is, the houses are to close to the railroad.
Commissioner Lopez: Any other comments? Everybody heard the
motion. Is the word of the motion.
Page 59
r .. A
~.
Unidentified Speaker: Mr. Chairman
Commissioner Lopez.: Yesl
Mr. Romero: I'd like to make one further comment.
commissioner Lopez: Yes, Mr. Romero.
Mr. Romero: In regard to what Mr. Stone said. You know, when you
start a project like this it's not a project that is going to
develop employment in 30 days, 60 days or 2 years. This is a long
range program, before they can get up and running you know, it's
going to be 3 or four years may be even 5 years before they get
through all this stuff. By then the economy should have turned
and we will have the industrial area around here. And we can use
those employees and they are going to be high paying jobs. It's
not a job that you can be working in a shopping center at minimum
wage. This town needs employment and if you want to look at the
long range goal of this city, this is what we need.
Commissioner Lopez: Any other comments. All those in favor of
approval of this item, say I. Opposed - No. How many in opposi-
tion, 10. Raise your hands please in opposition.
Unidentified Speaker: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to ask if you could
have a show of hands in favor of against or ........
Commissioner Lopez: An approval, all those in favor raise your
hands please.
Unidentified Speaker: Excuse Mr. Chairman the Secretary of
Commission hasn't taken a count. If you could ..............
Commissioner Lopez: Okay I Raise your hands please. Do you have
the names please --- Vince, Henry - against - Raise your hands
please those against. Henry, Mr. Enpeno, there is a question as
to whether Vince was able qualified to vote.
Unidentified Speaker: Commissioner Gaffney is eligible to vote in
that one of the regular Commissioners Judy Jordan is absent
tonight.
Commissioner Lopez: Alright, his vote counts.
Unidentified Speaker: If I can just advise the general public
that this is a recommendation going forth to City Council, they
will have it advertised public hearing. We have not set that date
yet. You can expect it most likely at the second meeting in March
or the first meeting of Council in April. It will be advertised
and be noted in the paper.
Commissioner Lopez: The decision of the Planning Commission are
Page 60
~ ",. .. .,
-.
final concerning conditional use permits, development permits,
tentative tract maps, and variances unless appeal to the Mayor
and Council, appeals and Mayor and Council must be made in
writing stating the grounds of the appeal must be submitted to
the City Clerk along with the appropriate fee within 15 days of
the decision. General plan amendments and amendments to the
municipal code will automatically be forwarded to the Mayor and
Common Council for final action. If you challenge a result in
action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you are someone else raised in a public
hearing described in this agenda. Do we have a motion to adjourn.
Floor adjourned. END OF TAPE 3 SIDE B
Page 61
Suggested Fonnat
1. STAFF INTRODUCTION
2. CALMAT PRESENTATION
3. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
a) SIGN-IN PROCESS - Request thai tOOse wishing to speakfill out a
"Request to Speak" form and give it to a staff member.
b) ONLY ONE TURN SPEAKING FOR EACH
PERSON I
~ LWITOFTHREEMINUTES~RS~A~R-
Staffwill keep track of time and will alert speaker when they have thirty seconds
left. Staff will call time when three minutes OOve elapsed.
d) SPE~RS CHOSEN IN ORDER OF SIGN-IN
(i.e., RANDOM ORDER) - Three to five at a time will be
selected to minimize time between speakers.
4. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE
ENTERTAINING QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL
s. T~ 10 MINUTE BREAK
6. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ACTION
SUBJEC~ Specific Plan No. 90-01, General Plan Amendment
No. 91-18 DevelDPmevt Code tmevdment No. 92-06
ConditionAl use pera1t No. 9 -~l/Reclamation PlAn, and
Tentative Tract Parcel Map Nos. 14106, 14107 and 14108
(w~. J
i
i
i
I
I
,
i
,d
j
,
I
I
I
,
I"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AN-D BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
lo.
PROPERlY LOCATION:
The project site is located west of Cajon Boulevard generally
between Devore Road and the unincorporated community of Muscoy in
the County of San Bernardino and the City of San Bernardino. Also
included is annexation to the City.
oppose"
ICJ..~
,~
,
PRO~ The proposal is to establish land use districts, permitted
uses, development standards and guidelines in order to utilize 1,392
acres of land for mineral e~tractive, heavy industrial, light
industrial and open space uses with mining related interim uses.
The project is phased with ultimate build out (for the light and
heavy industrial USp.s) at 25 vea~~. The Mayor and Common Council will
consider the proposed environ~ental impact report, mitigation
monitoring and reporting program and statements and findings of
overriding consideration in lIlaltiJ\g it.s determinat:i,oD oJ; thIs property
. n~ ronmen a Environmental Impact Report
........--_.
CA-L 1111.".
f-{-p:f- U DeJCIS
:---4E1IO.ct~
f"
PUBUC HEARING LOCATION:
SAN BERNARDINO aJY HAll
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 NORTH "O"::il,_l
SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92418
A J _.___..A
- J ~._"'.CiIr.......-_
---.....---......-- - -
..,..... (7MJ......-.
n.e.........c-CoInllI_ ..-
.-.,....,--_....-~
.. ....................... - Sir
-. SM......... c...n......
o-..........c .. ..............eo.
..... ..... "-- ....... at...... "- __ _ _ v-. ......
__........c....c:...L . _~c..a
.....-...........................-..-...
a.,ca......-- ..---....---....
............ T ,-..-.
......... . .. -........CoIt_____
CIIr....................c-c..IIIr...-.
.,........__ .. . 1:'DW'V.........
............ ....,_ _ ...v_
__....-..." _ ~ c.r,.........
...-..-.........
I'" ..."- --
v
........s.-
...-.......
r _4....--
to WILD
. t..t '::C
~~
o
HEARING DATEANDTNE:
May 10, 1993 at 3 :00 p.m.
._,..--
._---
c.r...........v
-
,,~t-1J
, dl.~ /
/-4'0'1-. og 7-S?-d.G
/ !J,..
. '" k~A-U- J)(,J
W'-, ~ c-,
, i' ~.7 __.OF.
'P-CUv~~.J ~.~?i'".;Z..-
~ ,/ r L.Dev!t or- v1. 9 ~<!' 0 7
'WOI
,.,-....'-..-,
~_511_.{
.- .'.'. n...... ~7u
..Q~~ ~.~~ ~
.' L~~-~.
. ~r:- ~ .~ ..~~/L~
J>~. --Z:t'.~~. '~~___~--:6~
~~~-?~~.~
r ~~.._.~~~~~
&7) ~ -,,>~~ ~~
..u~~~ -~~?~ru~ _-d-. ...
..--u...~~~~-44<'-~ ..
u ..... . .. :::::::r:~-Z:'__/~ ::~~
~.:~~.~.~
.~J{~~?
/
..~.~~
yg~ ~ ~" --ca-
......-... ~'7 .. "./ d-
-_ . _un __ . u_u_u. _ ... p~/"c:??
. . .... 'uu .. _ .... . ... .. (9 tiJ?)r r? -/0 ?2.
--/jjll @ IlIfW fl.'
.. CI NAY U 7 _- [jj
-- DE t)-OF~ ...U_ . .... - ... .._ u___.
P~~4
;D
~ ~
On
. u,
~<- '
2.J
-0
....
Ci1
~
....:..--,
MAY 10, 1993
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEAR COUNCIL MEMBERS,
WE THE PEOPLE OF THIS GREAT NATION HAVE A RIGHT TO LIVE, WORK,
PLAY ,AND ,MOST, IMPORTANTLY BREATH IN THE HOMES THAT WE HAVE CHOSEN
TO LIVE IN, THIS CALMAT PROJECT WILL TAKE AWAY, THIS RIGHT. CALMAT
IS THE WORST AIR POLLUTANT COMPANY THERE IS. WHEN WE CHOSE TO
LIVE HERE, WE LOOKED AROUND OUR SURROUNDING AND FOUND IT TO BE
SAFE FROM HARMFUL PREEXISTING CONDITIONS. IF'THIS WAS AN AIRPORT
THAT YOU WERE PROPOSING THAT WOULD BRING IN AN ~NORMOUS AMOUNT OF
JOBS, YOU WOULD NOT BEABLE TO BUILD IT IN A PREEXISTING COMMUNITY
THAT IS ALREADY FILLED WITH HOMES AND BUSINESS., ,WE WERE HERE FIRSTl
CALMAT AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF 8 PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO
PUT SUCH A HORRENDOUS HEALTH HAZARD IN OUR NE!G~~ORHOOD THAT WILL
NOT ONLY AFFECT THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE LIVING AROUKD THE PLANT, BUT
ALSO ALL THE PEOPLE OF SAN BERNARDINO, FONT~NA, 'RIALTO AND THE
ENTIRE INLAND EMPIRE.
THE FUMES FROM THE ASPHALT PLANT WILL BE BAD ENOUGHl BUT THE
DUST FROM THE CEMENT PLANT WILL BE EVEN WORSE.' CEMENT DUST IS
FINE PARTICLES CALLED PMI0. UNLIKE MOST OTHER TYPES OF SMOG THAT
YOU CAN EXPEL FROM YOUR LUNGS BY COUGHING IT UP~ CEMENT DUST
CAN NOT BE COUGHED OUT. IT STAYS WITHIN YOU. tou KNOW WHAT HAPPENS
WHEN CEMENT IS MIXED WITH WATER, WELL IT IS WORSE WHEN IT IS
MIXED WITH YOUR BODY FLUIDS AND SALIVA. IT IS TURNED INTO HARDENED
PARTICLES THAT FORM IN YOUR BODY CAUSING HORRENDOUS HEALTH EFFECTS.
AS IF THIS IS NOT ENOUGH, THEN THERE IS VALLEY 'FEVER THAT HAS BEEN
IDENTIFIED AS GROWING IN THIS AREA. THIS DISE!SE ALSO KNOWN AS
COCCIDIODOMYCOSIS KILLS 2% OF THE PEOPLE WHO COME DOWN WITH IT.
IT IS SUCH A NASTY DISEASE, THAT IF YOU DO ,GET IT, YOU MAY SUFFER
YEARS WITH IT BEFORE IT KILLS YOU. THERE WAS,A'MAN IN THE
RIVERSIDE AREA THAT CAME DOWN WITH THE DISEASE. HE WAS A WONDERFUL
HUSBAND AND FATHER OF 4 CHILDREN. HE WAS A GOOrr FAMILY MAN.
HE WAS A SUCCESSFUL LAWYER WITH A GOOD PRACTICE BEFORE HE CAME DOWN
WITH THIS DEBILITATING DISEASE. HE SUFFERED Ij YEARS WITH VALLEY
FEVER BEFORE IF FINALLY KILLED HIM. THIS IS. ONLy ONE EXAMPLE
OUT OF MANY. THERE IS A WOMAN THAT LIVES IN TVE PASS RIGHT NOW
THAT HAS BEEN SUFFERING WITH THIS DISEASE FOR' YEARS AND SHE HAS
TRIED EVERYTHING KNOWN TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND THE
HEALTH HERBALISTS TO TRY TO CURE THIS DISEASE. SHE IS STILL
SUFFERING WITH IT.
LET ME MAKE IT CLEAR - THIS PROJECT DOES NOT SELONG IN OUR
LIVES. THESE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE MANY REASONS WHY CALMAT
SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO MINE IN OUR AREA. THIS IS SOMETHING
THAT WILL NOT JUST AFFECT ONE SMALL COMMUNITY, BUT SOMETHING
THAT WILL AFFECT THE ENTIRE VALLEY. IT WAS ALREADY STATED
AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING THAT THE AIR POLLUTANTS
COULD NOT BE MITIGATED, COULD NOT BE MADE LESS BY CALMAT.
WITH'ONLY 5.6 JOBS PER PLANT LOCATION IN THE AREA NOW,
THERE ARE NO "OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS" FOR THIS PROJECT
TO BE ALLOWED TO DESTROY THE ENVIRONMENT. LADiES AND GENTLEMEN
OF THE COUNCIL - FOR THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF'ALL THE PEOPLE
OF THE INLAND EMPIRE, YOU MUST REJECT THIS CALMAT PLAN.
THANK YOU, ~ _~
~ g;~
~=::
787 KIMBARK AVE.
DEVORE, CA 92407
"
, ,
, '
.
I
;'
/
. "
FEBRUARY 16, 1993
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING COMMISSION
. .
.
RE: PROPOSED CAL MAT PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS ARE NECESSARY AND VITAL IN ORDER TO PROTECT RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES.
HAS THE E.I.R. ADDRESSED THE SPECIES OF FUNGUS THAT GROWS IN.THIS REGION THAT CAUSES A DEADLY
DISEASE OF COCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS? THIS DISEASE IS ALSO KNOWN AS VALLEY FEVER OR THE SAN JOAQUIN
VALLEY FEVER. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT HAS NOT ADDRESSED.TH~S FUNGUS, THEN THE REPORT IS
INCOMPLETE. .
THIS LIFE THREATENING FUNGUS LIVES IN THE SOIL 3-4 INCHES B~LOW THE SURFACE AND COMES CLOSER
TO THE SURFACE AFTER A RAINFALL. WHEN THE SURFACE IS DISRUPTED BY MINING, CONSTRUCTION,
TRAFFIC AND WIND, THE FUNGUS BECOMES AIR BORNE AND INFECTS TijE PERSON BY THE AIR THEY BREATH.
THE INFECTION CAN ALSO BE TRANSMITTED BY THOSE INFECTED BY OPEN SORES AND DRAINING SINUSES.
THE SYMPTOMS OF THIS DISEASE RESEMBLE THE FLU. IT CAN BE ACCORPANIED BY HIGH FEVER, CHILLS,
HEADACHE, COUGH, SEVERE BONE & JOINT PAIN, CHEST PAINS, SORE:THROAT, AND WEIGHT LOSS. IT CAN
ATTACK THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, CAUSE PNEUMONIA & ATTACK T~E MENINGES OF THE BRAIN. IT 15
A VERY NASTY DISEASE THAT NOT ONLY MAKES YOU EXTREMELY SICK, BUT ALSO KILLS 2\ OF THE PEOPLE
THAT COME DOWN WITH IT. DURING THE US FESTIVAL, MANY PEOPLE IN THE AREA AND PEOPLE WHO
ATTENDED THE FESTIVAL CAME DOWN WITH IT BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC THAT SENT THE DUST PARTICLES
INTO THE AIR. THAT WAS ONLY A THREE DAY EVENT. CAL MAT ,WILL ~E DIGGING IN THE WASH 7 DAYS A
WEEK, 24 HOURS A DAY - SENDING THIS DEADLY FUNGUS INTO TH8 AIR THAT WE BREATH.
"
MANY OF THE CASES GO UNREPORTED BECAUSE IT IS RARE, RESEMBLES THE FLU AND IS OFTEN
MISDIAGNOSED. BUT, ACCORDING TO THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, IN 1991 THERE WERE 113 CASES OF
COCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS REPORTED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.. IN 1992 THERE WERE 32 CASES.
THIS MAY NOT SEEM LIKE MUCH NOW, BUT ACCORDING TO LINDA MURPHY OF THE COUNTY HEALTH
DEPARTMENT, THE REASON WHY THERE WAS SUCH A LARGE INCREASe OF CASES IN 1991 WAS DUE TO THE
FACT THAT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAD A HUGE EPIDEMIC OF COCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS IN THAT YEAR. THE
STATE HAD OVER A THOUSAND REPORTED CASES. THE REASON FOR THE EPIDEMIC WAS BECAUSE THERE WAS A
ENORMOUS DUST STORM THAT BLEW IN THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY THAT SENT THIS DISEASE INTO THE AIR.
SHE SAID THAT ANYBODY WHO PASSED THROUGH TilE PASS (THE GRAPEVINE) CAME DOWN WITH THE DISEASE.
THE CAJON PASS IS A HEAVILY TRAVELED AREA. IT IS KNOWN AS THE CORRIDOR TO CANADA AND THE
ENTIRE COUNTRY. WE ARE KNOWN FOR OUR STRONG WINDS AND DUST STORMS. IF THIS PROJECT IS
APPROVED, HOW MANY PEOPLE IN SAN BERNARDINO, DEVORE, VERDEMONT, CIMMERON RANCH, MUSCOY AND THE
REST OF THE VALLEY AND THE REST OF THE COUNTRY WILL HAVE TO SUFFER AND DIE FROM THIS DISEASE?
ARE YOU, AS MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, PREPARED FOR AN EPIDEMIC OF THIS MAGNITUDE?
I URGE YOU, FOR THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THIS CITY AND COUNTY TO OPPOSE AND
DEFEAT TIiI S PROJECT.' _": -?~ 'l2.,""") tv. I / Jtl Tlit
ll-H5 WOJEcr :DC&,~ NUl Ul;{l-Vl~(l
, LvdlSl' ~1'Y1a:1J\lleq oj; ~ LcoflL"t,
~ue.'t~
SUSAN ENKOSKY
787 KIMBARK AVE.
DEVORE, CA 92407
/:1
;'!
/ / '
! .
I
~ I
\r.) ·
~ I
,.
tl
~'i~
<i. "I
~ ...
"' I
,
I
i
I
i
I
I
I
l.. ,
,
JII
':
:"'.
~......... .............-
- -- .J
. .L
may offset SS increases
"
WASIIINGTON (API - President
Carter Indicated Friday that Iny
auhatanUal hikes In Social Security
tlIXO!l likely will '"' nlloet la part of
hla promlllcd Income tall ,,,v;..iuII
plan, lest Ihey dampen the llCOIlnmy.
Carter d\acuaaed thll proapect In
r'"'IKlndlnll to questlona poaed over
a lelephone hookup by edlton and
publlahel'll Ittendlnll I Houston con.
ve!1t1~n,:,f I"" Natlnnal Newapaper
1,~,."'Vh.
The President waa asked about the
pcll'Illble InnaUOnary tmpllct of ma'
)or Social Security tax Increl~e
paued by the HoUJ8 on TbUl1lday, '"
believe that the major Impact mlll,ht
be a dampenlnll effect on our econo-
_u " h.. .._-","ANt
...~I _... .....r~&.._.._.
Carter nOted that he had' an.
nonneed at a Thul1lday RIlW! eon.
ference I delay In aubm...lon of tax
revlaton proposall, In part eo final
conRreBlllonl1 Ictlon on Social Se-
curity lelllllatlnn ean be taken Into
.rrnllnt.
"I would Ilueaa that I majOr ,actor
wontd he that If tI," IIoelal Security
..nesertfun,g.Y.$. .". . ,."
" Lemoc:;;n~:~ ~~ROn. :D~ ~:':'hth~=~~~:~~fi::
FreaDo aDd WUI\amI AIr Fore. Base tlaD deeert In 11121 ' '
".. ~ea~,~~~:"~~,,,,,~~w~\IOtI~: ^ Dumber or personl wbo enklred
......._... ..._ ... . .... ...&"'_ ...._, ,...t- ..",--...a - .....,..
ior irnc;; ......._ _fA. "" trtnrnacb' ._- '.~'. .... 'l;;i. ,r-;-;-; Nt~... ~,
".-t' and .~eii~combIDed. ,,-..... and other d\allten. "'e
Th d I dill ..... referred to It the t1in",,*
e lea.e \I Wlelelpread ''TUtaDllbamen'l eune" me ...
tbroullhout Southern Clllfomta. Ar. beeD coekl\e. ,y . _V"
,zona, Nllw ." ,it.'U anu I*tll 0: Tex. .
.~, .,ua!nllan estlmated ffT,IlOO ~ .
an~t~'~~::e: l::e aIIo been"': Soviet8 Will8ho~ .~
ported I~ the M\IIlppl V.IIL')' ares, tank for ll'n t tl'm' 0' .
wbero It Is kDown I' M......ppt
Valley fever, and the funllU' his,
C':cn ~n ",~~,,,,, In ~"'n ..odl,
: Coeule III aIIo a problem' In the
Cbaco rCllton or Arllentlna.
, The IlraDt, from the U.s. Depart-
ment of Land MaDlllement. aIIo pro-
vldOl for atudlea or IOU from the
Yuba ~ In w8lltem imperial
County. JD addltloD. a plane will tate
~mples or dust from the air. .
, Sll\1lpllntl .W wnllDue thl'OUgb
the winter. and tho ItUdy II ell'
f1<<ted to be completed In June.
Particularly vulnerable to cocble
are roldbuUdOl'll and ~heelOll\ltl
worklnllln deMrt 8lt8lI.
, POIIllbly the mo:t famon! refer.
AnNl tn cocklle re\atA!ll tn the open-
. MOSCOW IAPI - The Ilcrd8t pi-
rlIdo MM. T tbm'!ll fIto<l !lItlla", to
mark the 80th IDIII-ry or the
Jlo\abOYIk reYtllutlol\ wID lnelude
trICked YOhkl8ll for the fl!'ot.tt~e In
thrM yean. 0IIt or theDl the DewT/2
taDk. WesterD diary 1IOIImJIIald,
The taDk hu been d~ wttb
90YIet foreea ID EaIt GtniWIy for
Dearly I year.' bUt bel beeD' kept
from Western view lDalde the Sov\ilt
UDioD. ' '
WeaterD aoureea Iald the So\1et1
plan . btaer wellpoIII dIIpIa' tbII
year thin lity IIDee It'74,' bUt ID.
ierpreted .11 In keep\Jt8 with the
IDIIIv.ury mUestone 8IId DOt. a
n_ IleldI:U! or mJUtary muaele.
expcl'
prlsOl
Tbl'
to tho
_n
tax Incrclse II .uhatanUII art", tbe year.
Conllreaa Rets tbrough, wc'lI try to educ:
compen8llto for thll In tllc tax reo
form plckllle," be added. 'F
Im~'::::~ ~~i~~ I~~~~ ~
from the present _ a year to
"',trllI, The blkea wOtlld be phaaed In
startlnllln t9'78, The Senate hII yet 0'.
to act. on similar 18Illllatlon.
Carler allo told the NNA he II
"~Iltl'l conccrned" aboUt South W,
.\. :~=:.: !,:,!=~ !!!~!!.'!'! ~,,~ft A",...
Vonter', contention that Vorster Uie
never promlaed to forego dllYelop. atef'
m..nt or nuelllar w"'ponI. . In
1'be U.s. Pi'eeldeot..1d hll bel1e\l8ll Coo'
the South Arr\eaDI "uD~tly 1l8".
~:fil~~ th....-tftl1lllt to deIl!D. ~
""" ~aet-P ...,...~~' . r
, ,.)n an ' )hlJJ t~ Oft~: tiI,
televllltm'1 "'tIIut!l alld ADawerl," \Ill
Vol'llter ..Id. "I am Dot Iware of suy 1
promlle that: I IlIVO PreIkIeot Dr
Clrter." ur
""'_. ~..,.. ~'"I~..t:'I~!~~'ttv .
made pubtlc part or aD Oct. Plotter DI
to Carter In wbleh Von'.cr wrote '
''that lIOUtb AIr..... c1Icl not bay,," lIor :;;
did It Intend to develop. I Duelesr be
explOlllve d41vk:41 fur any purp=, e:
peaceful or otberw\le." uc
Carter'l comment wu hll fltBt on e1'
tbe subject IIDcI! the Vomer In.
tervlew, W
DurlDR the quelttoD lel.loD. ' f('
Carter 1\10 re~ IUllllesttonB, en.
dOl'lled by. some of bll predec8lllOI'lI,
that presidents be \lmIted to IBlDllle t
IIx-y...r term.
"I believe the present ayateni Ll the ...
beat one. with aeeouatabUlty every
four yelra." he 8Ild. > . I
At the atart or the question lei'
lion. the Preeldent VOIUDteered tllP,t
be w.. "r.leued It the
admlDlstrlltlon '~"!fOI'lI "" far." He
declared he deliberately ut nut 10 ,.
addren manT. complex. con- ~
trOYOI'lIIII IDd 'overdue" pt')bleml
durlnll hll fltBt year In orfIce, ·
"J would llUeaa the pace or majOr
Item, would drop off Dext year," he'.,. '
aald.' ',,' / I
.,: ~
Senate liberals maI)~e to pare
eIlergytax credits.for industry
. . ;
, w ASlIJN(JToN (API _ to Portloll or the eDlIrIY c:redlta on espetIdltUrea for souaellde, thereby obtaID-
The '8eIIat8.eoDIIIderlDll" plan today. eonvertlDl lleItlDI P!antI IDI' an enl!l'l1. bill more to
.. bllllOD cnerv ,tIS cr8d- The rest or the lIIebP II and other 'lclUtIeI from the 8eDIt8'1 I\klDIo
it blIl. voted ___1IelmIDI- tmder c.ouaid;erltloD by'. ;:murJ: or on to' more Sea. JlAI\JeIt Dole. B.Kan.,
!y FrIday to. tnoek out Rouse-SeDate COllferenct'. eoaI. whO led the eoaJ1tloD or.
bU\1OtlS of d4!llm Atll8ft. eommltee which .4ea4.,' p.lI!!!he ~~Tt1J BfIOo fort, Iald he WII afrlld thll
can bUllln.!I!J' -W reo IoeIled Pr\dIr 0Vllr whetb- ceeded ID the p:k- SeDa~ 00!If(!ffe8, If Ilvetl
ee1ve for ablftIDI rr- u\o or to bUI fuel..IDeffIdeDt ,.... t:I.- - bave heeD thlI tlIII..dticted b uiloID.
w II ps md all to more can beIl-"18 III te8O. ' almoet DO ebIDeO for eon- would 6ectPl dUrtDI the
eb\Uldant eoil or' Olbet . . . . gt 8IolW' ~ (If tI!.. eoarernce taJlaI the iDultI-
fueII. ' &eea.... lit. the 1m\lll88o, IDoIIt Important e1_ta b....iiODdoIIar tall 011 crude
.0: no' ~_ .-w;' the eoarei'ellee ~ of prelldeot Carter'l oil whlch.l'le11deDt carter
_..... \a wutkW OIl the enertY~~lyelI'...:... &_ ~~...:c-":=J':
i
I
f/~
CAN TOR G REG 0 R Y Y A R 0 S LOW
3911 Carme1ina street
San Bernardino, CA 92405
May 6, 1993
Members of the Common Council
City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
re: Specific Plan 90-01 (Ca1Mat)
Dear Counci1members:
I am writing in support of the proposal by Ca1Mat to mine in the
Cajon Creek wash. Since this is a reversal of my earlier opposition
stated in writing and orally to the Planning Commission, I feel the
need to explain.
I moved to San Bernardino in 1978 to accept the office of Cantor at
Congregation Emanu E1. I lived in an apartment until April of 1991
when I bought a home in Muscoy. Even though it is just a few houses
below the Cimmaron Ranch development, I was not informed of Ca1Mat's
ownership of the area in question or their plans for it. When I read
about it in The Sun, I was horrified to think that this beautiful
natural area, which was part of my attraction to buying nearby, was
going to be destroyed.
Since that time I have had the opportunity to meet with various
members of the Ca1Mat team and I want to say that most of my fears
have been competently and quickly addressed and assuaged. I have
found Linda Brannon and her associate, Dan Mitrovich, to be very
considerate of the concerns of area residents and anxious to make us
feel satisfied that our concerns will be addressed fully and
appropriately and the negative aspects of having such operations
adjacent to our neighborhood mitigated to our satisfaction. Doug
Sprague has done much to answer our concerns and to withstand with
great patience the often hostile nature of our statements of concern.
As an example of the extent to which they have gone to relieve our
concern, Linda arranged for my colleague and I to tour the existing
Ca1Mat facility on Highland Avenue to see firsthand the efforts to
revegetate the area. This is of tremendous concern to me as it is a
real pleasure to be able to go out into the wash area and enjoy its
natural beauty. On April 15 we were treated to what I can only call
a VIP tour led by Doug Sprague, Project Manager, Martha Blaine,
biologist, the head of the plant and the person in charge of the
actual replanting. They were there to check on the progress of the
revegetation and it was their first opportunity to do so after the
#1
rains. Their enthusiasm and excitement were quite visibly authentic
and convincing and my partner and I were also quite impressed with
their efforts, concern and success. It far exceeded my expectations.
All four were very patient in answering our many questions and their
answers were believable and sincere.
I am now fully convinced that CalMat should receive your approval of
their plans subject, of course, to the necessary ongoing overseeing
of environmental concerns to which they have agreed as required by
law and to which (I am firmly convinced) they are committed.
I have found the people who work with and for CalMat to be open and
receptive to the concerns of the community. I have also become
convinced that they are true to their word. They are excellent in
following up on the concerns I have raised and I am now comfortable
in saying that I believe that they will be good stewards of the land.
Unfortunately I will be out of town when you discuss this on Monday
and I regret that I will have to miss the meeting. This letter will
have to serve in my place. If I can be of further help to you,
please do not hesitate to call on me.
Cantor Gregory Ya~lOw
.. _. _._._~ ....~h__~ _
MAY 10
'93 13:59 MWD/PLANNING DIV.
1".1
n Ie Mc:TnOl"'OI.ITAt~ WATc:n olcrn,CT 41
OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IJ />@>
n11 SUNSET eoULEVARD ($' ,
MAILING ADDRess: EIOX $4'~ ' />
LOS ANGeLes. CAUFQRNIA _ ~y <t' / /j?
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEE~~~ ~ Q &... <t~
~~~+ -"{)' / /}
~o#~ //)
,~~
~4' fft)
.
,
-
"
DATE;
5/'0/'13
I I
~r. ~ ~~
i '0' (7'0" Jrn.1p.A- .0:..~...ujJ
i
-
AiTN.:
, COMPANY FAX NO. ( )
..
FROM:(l~ ~
,- ~
~ .
~~
OFFICE TELEPHONE NO.: (:.!la}~:iO- ~ II .,
.
FACSIMILE 1 ~LLl-'lIUNL.. 1'I\.1.! 1;!1;S) ;.lau (. I I 9- -
COMMENTS;
. -
r I I I' : {f r J,
. (fi'l/~~ 7'.-Ll'1/---/~-- </vv"""'7",,-,,--h---. ,lJ..A!,;",!""-'--r.!
(5f;u.~j~ 1Cf.-,,- '70 - 0/ -::tlA.1 ,[..LID .<t.ua\.<tli ..I.tlt'l. ~ ....
~ '-f1..R- ~ ~ '7&u~. oJ ~(}/D~ 40'1 '-14- ~:-
~-~~ :J .,
,..",.AL l'iUMBEA 0(' P'AG!9 TRAN9MITTCO tNCLUOI~lC COVIiR SloIliiiiT '
-
-
RECEIVER:
~ NOTE; IF YOU DO NOT -RECEIVE ALl. OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL THE METi'lOPOUTAN WATER DISTRICT
OPERATOR
(213) 250-
-
......
~eNoe~
.. ;>. "'A,<:;F INnlr:ATF THF. FOU.OWING COPIES 'TQ SI!:
-
U RETURNED BY MAIl.
....,
W PICKED-UP
~
U OISCAi'lDEO
ATTN.:
ROOM NO.:
FOR MWD oFFIce use ONLY
SSNT BY:
. TIME:
DAfE:
ORIGINAL ReTURNeD T&.
.:.)..-.. 13'01 ~tO
r'!fl',' 10 '93 14:00 r'1WD/PLAIf'l1I'lG 01'1.
P.2
..' ..-'"
-~
-1
-
.
4/15/83
MWD Rialto Pipeline
Schedule 272 sa
1VW 1606-28-9
w.o. 7-5602
=
Mr. W. 3. Conway, Jr.
Tradelands, IDe.
800 Wilshire Boulevard
13th Floor
T.nfl Angel eR. Ca 1 ifnrnia 90017
Dear Mr. Conway:
.
i
i
I
1
,
:
,
I
,
i
~
r.ainn r.rfl~k PrnjftGt
Ref6J:6%1C6 is made t.O OUJ:' Jl'ebJ:'\lU'Y 10, 1CJ83 , lettor to
you, and to a December 6, 198~, letter fl:oll Bass .
Kesearch, inc., concerning access easements .~ru~~ ~Y+ Ice
property in the Cajon Creek Area. Reference is uso made. to a
December 17, 1982, letter from Born, Barrett and Associates
submitting printouts of ~C-2 analyses for the proposed sand
and gravel mining operations in COlJ on Creek upstream of our
Rialto Pipeline which crosses the Cajon Creek Area.
-
Am dimeuQgad in a phone rnnvprg~~inn hPor.wp.en
Mr. c. Ray Base at Bass Research and Mr. Herb Niederbe.rger of
Metropoli tan, the easelllent for the conveyor belt across our
iI&UPCLl.y l;ihuuld ue _L l......L 20-E.:..:.t-wide itultead of lO-:foot.
wide in order to per.mit vehicular access along the conveyor for
maiB~no.nea. Dowavar, ainao we roquir. vehiculu acc.ss 'to our
manhole and air release structure at Rialto Pipeline .
fi~aT.inn ~~~4+1h.3? f~am the east, the QOnYeY9~ ~u~L b~ located
~_e..e.n ou~ .~-=~e Clft4 ~e eaat lino of g;m Jlarnardino
county Flood Control District's MuSCOI' Groin No.2
rilJht.of-way. '..
I f access to our property is blocked by any fences,
we l'equire that 12-foot-wide ga.tes 1). installed. If the gates
;are to b. looked, we lIIuatbe permittltd to placl!' ant' lnr.kfl an
the gates.
Metropoli tan' s pipeline is adequate for AASBTO B-20
l~adin~ at the present ~round surface. If your contractor
plans to use any equipment over our pipeline wnicn wi~~ impose
loads greater than AASBTO H-20. it will be necessary to submit
MRY 10 '93 14:00 MWD/PLRNNING DIV'
P.3
!.." ...
I
i
..
-~
,
4/15/83
,
Mr. W. J. Conway, Jr,
-2-
-;
,
I
the specifications of such equipment for our review and approval
prior to its use.' :
We require that prints of prel.iminary construction
1'"..."", r,'.!' ,.",. ,.,.."u....l/,,, 1....11. ,"...111...1/.... ...\..1 \..;1 ...'i,'li,',o:J ...,.'...."''''
our property be cubmitted for our review and ilpproval.
To obtain the aasements to cross our tee prop~tl',
Tradelands Inc., must submit maps and legal deacri,ptions of the
...onings tCI ~. A. L. Hov~ncc, DinC'tOr o! 011:1: Bight of Wn m4
Land Division. .
.-
M..l.4ui>u1~ L...u JUII... L. 1>", ..l~uwJu "dU.':;II.1.~..u':;c::::'.. .!LCJ:OG~ -
your I)roperty from Institution Road to our fee property.
our review of your project report indiCAteli thi&t 'tM
L.. _ f__ L _f _.:.... --r r--r---J J_.._ L..__ _r J _-l. r.J~1-"::. J..UIU -
our right-of-way wi11 not withstand the severelY erosive
veloci ties anticipaUd. We object to the project until we are
satisfied that adequate protection will be J)rovided for our
pipeline.
Should you require additional information, please
contact Mr, Jim Bale, telephone (213) 250-6000, ex~nsion 564.
Very truly yours,
Robert c. Moehle
chief EngiDe~
BN/sh
cc: Mr. Robert B. Born
Born, Barrett and Associates
1200 Quail Street, Suite 175
Newport Beach, California 92660
-
-
-
Mr. C. Ray Bass
Bass Re~earch, Inc.
P.O. BOX 14
Little Rock, California 93543
-
'.
05/10/93 13:23 1:217 7457
!IWD CIVIL ENGR.
~001
.
THE METAOPOUTAN WATER DISTRrCT
OF SOUTHERN CAUFORNIA .
DATE: 5-fO-Q3
TO: C~~ S:vY) &:r"OfYl;nv
COMPANY NAME
ATTN: I~~ ~t:orCLh u.hdrott EXT. II
/J] ~!,~~ U fjJ
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET OEC::;.:!': 3.o\,y ,,~_
..: ""ENr '""ItN""",..
"'J/I.D/~ 0" PI ~A:.~
G 8~':NG.
J::ep+o~ -'Pla.n 1"'\1 (j
FACIU'TV
COMPANY FAX NO~'\ :;, e4 - 54 Ca3.
1WO CAuFORNlA PLAZA.
350 SOUTH GRAND
MAJUNG ADDAES$; BOX 5-'153
LOS ANGELES. CAUFORNIA 90054
-
FROM: ":De'l rd. e.. We-s-r
NAME
2[=1
OFFICE TELEPHONE Nq,: (213) 2Brl- C.oloqtp
~IUI fJG--/~lJVlrcotJMc~L
DIVISIONlSECTION
FACSIMILE TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 250- 6260
COMMENTS: :t"vlCL-vC€1C fv..) '-/HlS. 'tf?-~l--n-A \.- lS A0
t\DplllOUA\....- U:;.("'It'---1Z- ~ rl)e;: 1'1)OUI.0 UlC".G;"
_1f\JC".UJoe;o (1) i"A-E: ~~€I2.PL f.~f2.C "R)(C..
-0~i~C ?uartJ qb -01
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED INCLUDING COVER SHEET
REC.~IY~~.:._.___________.___. _____. ,
4-
>- NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT.
OPERATOR M. P'tJEN'.rEs/J. A. HAlfiLTOH (213) 250- 634'1
NAME
SENDER;
>- PLEASE INDICATE THE FOLLOWING COPIES TO BE;
u RETURNED BY MAIL
u PICKED-UP
:l OISCARoeo
ATTN.:
ROOM NO.:
FOR MWD OFFICE USE ONLY
SENT BY:
TIME;
DATE:
ORIGINAL RETURNED TO:
y(
05/10/93 13:23
... ,
'0'217 i 45i
JIWI) CIVIL ENGR.
1i!J002
"1
~
.
~
,
r
\
i
i
!
!
FEB 7
19S~
MWD Rialto Pipeline
Schedule Z72 SG
1VW 1606-28-9
W.O. 7-5602
Mr. Roberta. Born
Born, Barrett & Associates
Consulting Engineers
~200 Quail street, suite 260
Newport Beach, california 92660
Dear Mr. Born:
cajon Creek Project
Thank you for your letter dated November 8, 1983,.
submitting four copies of a preliminary concept drawing of a
channel bottom stabilizer for protection of our Rialto Pipeline
and our land downstream of the proposed sand and gravel mining
operations in Cajon creek in San Berna~dino county.
We request that your plan be revised to show The
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California as fee owner
of the ZOO-foot-wide strip of land instead of the holder of an
easement across cajon Creek. Appropriate rights must be
obtained prior to any work on Metropolitan's land.
It is our opinion that a channel bottom stabilizer
constrUcted of dumped rock of 200 pounds to ~/2 ton size, is
inadequate in mass to maintain the channel invert under many
flow conditions. We are aware that the Corps of Engineers has
constructed stabilizers with Derrick stone of much larger size.
We are also concerned with the additional excavation expense
that would be incurred to gain access to our pipeline if it
were built directly over the pipeline alignment. Locating the
stabilizer downstream from our pipeline or land could eliminate
this problem. we therefore recolllDlend that you give further
consideration to the design and location of the stabilizer.
,
05/10/93 13:24
~21i 7!57
HWD CIVIL ENGR.
~003
Mr. Robert H. Born
-2-
FEB 7 1984
We will require that l'radelands. Inc., pJ;ovide
Metropolitan with adequate legal assurance that it will main-
tain and repair or reconstruct the stabilizer to original
design line and grade if it is damaged or destroyed by stom
runoff or otherwise. We will also require adequate legal
assurance that Tradelands. Inc.. will be responsible for any
damage to or 10ss of our pipe1ine or land resulting from
erosion of the stream channel caused by its sand and gravel
mining operations in cajon Creek. Further, if the stabilizer
is located on our land, we will require adequate 1e9a1
assurance that TJ;adelands, Inc., will be responsible for any
damage to OJ; loss of the adjacent pipeline or land of
San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District.J;esultinq from such
erosion caused by such mining operations. Appropriate docu-
mentation wi11 be required.. .
Should you require additional information, please
contact Mr. Jim Hale. telephone (213) 250-6000, extension 564.
Very truly yours.
Robert C. Moehle
Chief Engineer
JEB/sh
cc: Mr. W. J. Conway, Jr.
TJ;adelands, Inc.
800 wilshire Boulevard
13th Floor
LOS Angeles, california 90017
Mr. C. Ray Bas5
Bass Research, Inc.
P.O. Sox 14 _
Little Rock, California 93543
San Gabriel valley Municipal
Water District
P.o. Box 1299
Azusa, California 91702
Attention Mr. Bob Sta11inqs
'05~1~/93 13:25
tt217 7457
lIWD CIVIL ENGR.
III 004
,.. ."
i
.
FEll '1 19&4
Mr. Robert H. Born
-3-
cc: Mr. C. J. DiPietro
Flood control Engineer
San Bernardino County Flood
control District
825 East Third street
san Bernardino, California 92415
Department of the Army
Los Angeles District
Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 2711
Los Angeles, California 90053
Attention Itt. Norman 1Irno
Chief Engineering Division
county of. San Bernardino
planning Department
1111 East Mill Street
San Bernardino, california 92410
bce : ,j. W. BeiD
G. Horowitz
J. c. Houlton
R. B. carnahan/R. Fernandez/
A. Rnoop'
F. G. Eaves (2)
W. p. LundYV
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
. .
,INSTRUCTIONS OF RANCHO SAN DIEGO SAND PLANT
. .
TO ALL DRIVERS, PLEASE OBSERVE THE FOLLOWING RULES OF THIS
PLANT:
1. THE PLANT OPENS AT 8:00 AM - PLEASE DO NOT WAIT
FoR PLANT TO oPEN ON PARR FOUR.
2. OBSERVE A 20 M.P.H. SPEED LIMIT IN SUBDIVISION
3. OBSERVE POSTED SPEED LIMITS ON JAMACHA & WILLOW GLEN
4. DO NOT TAILGATE
5. NO JAKE BRAKES oR HORNS
6. BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR
-------------------
-------------------
.....
.. .
~"j ....'
.....
,
f". ,.
RULES OF D~IVING ON DEHESA ROAD AND WILLOW GLEN
DRive
I
ur neighbors who ~ae Dehesa Road and Willow Glen Orlve have expressed great
c ncern 'or their sarctty and general welfare because of the way some drivers operate
t e dump trucks on' ~hese public roads.
hile most dump tr~~k drivers respeot the rights of othere and take pride In extending
r ad courtesy to all. t ere Ie positive evidence that some drivers are not operating their '
v hlcles In this ma nero By signing this document,: we are agreeing that these
p actlces,Should no, nd will not be permitted to continue, and we will outline corrective .
a Ion to be taken to. hall such practices.
I
T e unacceptable driVing conduct referred to Is:
') ExCeed,ng the 45 mph speed limit;
2) Unsafe baeslng of one dump truck by anQtherj passing on blind curves,
or wherp there Is Insufficient Sight dlstanqe to on-coming traffic;
I
3) Use of iexhaust brakes (Jake brakes) or horns to frighten or startle
motorists, bicyclists, equestrians or pedestrians using the public roads;
i
4) Tallgati~g;
. I
5) Two dump trucks running parallel and blOcking all traffic behind them,
where there are two traffic lanes In one dlrectionj
7)
,
Forming a single file of several dump truoks so close together that
residents have difficulty entering or leavl.,g their driveways;
Parking' before 7:00 a.m. In locations where truck noise and/or
conver$tions between drivers disturb relilldentSj
Any other unsafe or discourteous behavior, although It might technically
be legal, that might frighten, Intimidate or irritate the general motoring
public iwhlle using the local public; roads In their immediate
nelghbdrhoods.
6)
8)
;
ginning immediately. the owners, managers and supervisors of all Of the undersigned
b IIdlng material and, trucking firms operating on and ~Iong Oehesa Road and Willow
len Drive Will clOSQly observe the operation of all d~mp trucks. Drivers observed
v lating the rules of t1rlving conduct listed above will be singled out and promptly dealt
Ith. A few bad drlvllrs are not going to be allowed to. negate the responsible efforts
~
~
r
. ,,";' "
!
o. the goj>d (Irlvers gnd producers. The neighbors d_serve our very best efforts to
r duO$ th; Impacts o~ our operations on theIr lives. Imarlln'e one of your retired parents
o other loveCl one 8s one of these neighbors, and operate your rig accordingly.
i
Pease In<,loate that ~bu have reoelved, read and understand this agreement by signing
I the spice Immedl~tely below: .
I
Driver's Signature
, !
, i
, . I .
T e und~rtjl!' ned n~ebY Instructs all employees and other dump truck operators
h ullng b. lid ng mat. rials produced by them to conform. to the rules of driving conduct
Ii ted In t 9 bove, reement: .
,
,
, I
JOHN'S tFtUCKING
mLYt~G
DAVE MAR'flN SUPPLIES
PRE.MIX~D CONCRETE
YON SAND CO PANY
SUPERI~~DY MIX
L 9\9212\Aulos
"JOBS.
':600;~~r obs';
," " ... . II>
:ra,?,dal~ ",','", 1992
; ,','<I'll"','"',,.;" "":"',I~; 8eceived
'.Ie"a;.'::'vm,'.'.' "g'. ::,i0~._ fUI;,::~~:~.nn ~
. " . . \~ &
". ',' ~.l':l '..':. _ . 'i _'-,'( q ,_':.
~~
, .
I.
,
"a~ ea' ,,"j P",',,',
'{ t;~:i'\\'l':::-: <,LdJ.
.. ..... ,'-, .:"..~ 'lol')I;l_~'H,)fr~~:j
. .-....~.).j\.-.~'t-. 11:- ,,: -, t
_:l-~,',,~.~l.....~JJ~I).;,~!"11 H "J.,H! ';':':1
.. .T1le'ma'orltyofJObS ,'^ ::"',1
. ' ... , II.., _ .:. l"..~, . I 11
..; leaving Callf9mla for, '". ,,1
,;elsewherecomesfrom,. ':.
:SouthemCallfomla:'''. ",
" i_I -;~ ',""'!lntl- h"'....'Jn-q.~ "Tr'.1rtT ,~l ""_l;:('.M
. ':B,crUHAMWIIIIERALL"n', ,,}
Sun BusilieSsWriter ~ j,,;<.l'~r,-:-,,; .~:-:ti!"
L'; "~~'l/,~. ~i_"f ;'~;!f''''l':':'''~1'' of
, ,Six. Southland" Countilis; "Iri~' ,.
I . eluding San Bel'llardino, have aII-.
I sorbed. . 87. P ercen. t of all jO. b losses .
'In California, during the, reces- "
: :sion;says a report'lssuedMonday .,
j by the Federallteserve Bank.;" 'J :
I.' J~ h~~e: v~ed' at ~ra~e 1
:Of, .~.cme. "tliAh";6(JO.... .,~. in-~...' '~_ .'
.' ~lflPJlP~tJl.e'~
1if'1\ths. largely' because of de,...
rre;;~e' and 'aerospace cuts and '.a
'downturn in construction, the
'study said, '.. :.:
, n' 1i~":lt:.~.,..:.; ':'"' _' ", .
,,;.~Slll1:.BernardiDo.iaul/Uside,
Los"Abgelesj;Oranger-San .Dlego
andW.en~a'couDt,l..Jl.a~ 'lot;t .
520, . "., ~fJ.M.,
se" _ ,ii'a~~_
"" ~'-~:~'.' "~~,
con "".... ..
. "',t/~,:- ;A:~j ". - ~ .
4~.. ~..' t ,mard.. ino and River-
'sid 't/Ie.'7.5 'pi;rcent an. I. /
{lUalJOO SRlwth1rllte &om 1983 to )?
.990~~ClWnP edlnto .. 1.8 per-
cenllJAA~~~~0':; '-;: ~',
~'-In:'Los -.\njeies'-County; job
groWiIi'J\liii"averaged 2_9 percent
trom,J983 to'1990, and'is sinking i
'at, a' 4.1"percent'rate. Orange '
County'wlmt.from5 percent
growth to 3.4 percent shrinkage. .-
. ;,.. .~'.t ' ~. -li- ..I... ;1 '. ;._, .,
"1' knew -thiit 'Southern CalI-
fornia' was ina worse' situation .,.
thlll\.t.It~.t~st. Of the :s.y.te,,~I{t, 1 .~
wailrsurprised atthe m~tudellf7
the 'Pi'olileni';!l:&aid CMolyn:.Sh. '
wood-Call, who auth()redtiiestil:~
~ dy. ~y:,,:~'1.t_':"'a. ~- "
I WO~~~eb~':::::/f:::~:~:'
and 'baDlcruptcy rates - has ex.
I' ceeded the downturn of a decade
ago, Sherwood-Call said. .
, ,'~Th!! dete'rloratlon in th~
. 'area's' economy has been' much
greater during the current cycle
than'it ,was durlnllthe early
19805;- even thQugh the U.S, r&'. .
cession has been milder." ",
SherWOiid:Call s~d the region
would benefit" from a national
economic upturn. but little evi~
dence suggests a speedy local re-
covery. .
. ."In. the short term there are.a-
lot ofnellatives stillworking,"she
said., ;'~There.'<are'lnore'i1ef~IIS4l..
cutseoming, and commercial real
estate will probably stay dead for
\ Bome'ti1ne.!'~:'~:::.._ _-_-- ..:-:-:" --- - .
-' ,.~'~)r"':i t T "1 I.
il
f;)
EI c. C<;, RR
~
April 22, 1993
IECN
SB development plodding along
Head 0/ Economic Del'elopment Deportmtntlol1
Superblock plans slilI going forw.ord
By L)'nrllr Jueneman have dirlieulties aelting !inancina.
And cities don'l have Ibose kinds 01
resources 10 fund everylbina .lhem.
selves. If we did, we wouldn'
bolber looking for private develop-
ers,-
The slale legislalure recenlly
look $2.3 million from San
Bernardino's redevelopmenl agency
budge~ he noted.
Bul an all-OUI eITan Is 01110 rmd
another developer 10 pick up Ihe
Superblock project, Henderson
said. There are long and shon.tum
goals for Ibe projecL The comple-
lion of Court SUCCI Square. for ClI'
ample, could happen IS early IS Ihe
middle of May, just in time 10 c0-
incide with the arrival of Ibe
MelJOlink train at Ihe old Sanll Fe
dcpot. The square will be in Ihe
midsl of "hi&h activity zone:
Henderson said, desi&ned 10 be
more user and business friendly.
Though oUlside forcel are
enough 10 hinder Ibe Superblock
projecl. Ibere Is some intemaltur.
moil as well. A new police Slation
is slalcd ror construction al Sevenlh
and D SlreelS. The eurrenl police
SLalion would be taken down 10 a1.
low lor Ihe development of Ibe Suo
perblock.
B Ul Councilman Ralph Heman.
dez believes Ihe police stalion
should be revamped bUI stay in lhe
same arel.
According 10 EDA estimales,
Hernandez's proposal 10 keep Ibe
SLation wilbin Ibe Superblock would
eosl approximately $15 per square
roO! more Iban Ihe Sevenlb and D
Sucet sile for Ihe same size
building.
"It's going 10 be a 101 easier 10 al.
tract Slrong developers once we
show aelion on behalf of Ibe
agency," Henderson said. There.
rore. proceeding "ilb Ibe currenl
Superblock plan 10 demolish the old
police slation would be a "visible
sign" mal San Bernardino is serious
about gelting down 10 business,
Henderson added.
If plans continue moving lor.
ward, me police department could
be in its new lacilily by Sprin& or
nexl year he said, and constnIC:Jon
or lhe Superblock should 1M up as
wen.
Bul despile differences or opiniOll
on what should &0 where, or some
financial setbacks that have been
eneounlered. Henderaon Indlca\el
IhaI SaIl Bcnwdlno II IlOI JOinIIO
live up ...y 01 lIS deveJopmell\
ideas wilhout a fi&hL
A public hearin& has been set for
May 10 10 discu" 1M pendllll
closure or Sevenlb SIJeeI belWCC\I
D and E streets. Only aboul 1600
cars are determined 10 &0 through
thallRI per clay, HenderSOIIIIClled,
10 1U000in.1hem 10 other IlreelI
should nol be a problem.
Plans ror improving a dwindling
downlown San Bernardino may
havc becn pul on hold bullbey are
nOI squelched. according 10 Ken
Henderson, lhe executive direelor
of San Bernardino's Development
Dcp;mmenl.
The plan for a single.rc~idcnee
occupancy, SRO. projccl known as
Ihe Camornia Inn. slaled ror the
comer or Fiflh and E succts, has
becn sel back because developer fi.
nancing has nol been acquired yet,
Henderson said. Part of the hold up
in Ihe projecl is also be due 10
allorneys for lhe SI. Bernardino's
senior citizen projecl spea'-ing in
opposition 10 the SRO, Henderson
said.
Also, Henderson added lhal a
liquor slore is in dose proximity 10
Ihe prorosed SRO sile and Ibal a
developmenl code amendment 10
allow ror Ibal wa.< denied 5.0 by me
planning commission.
"Thai places thc project in some
jeopardy," Henderson said, "Bullhe
developer can appeal 10 Ihe cilY
council and it can rC\'crse Ihc
planning commission's decision:
He also said lhc developer could
look al olber sitcs 10 place Ibe SRO.
BUI trying 10 obtain rrivale fi.
nancing ror Ihe Caliromia Inn. like
so man)' Olhcr downlown rrojcCL<.
is rcally IhcAru' or lhe problem.
Henderson S3id.
"Therc's a rcal que~lion in the
opinion or the staff if construction
rinanting can bc acquircd in Ihc
near ruture," he said,
The California Inn was 10 have
265 units. each an average or 230
square reel at renls rrom S315 10
$500 per month. II would be rOUT
stories l:lll with undcrgroun,l park-
ing.
BUI also indefinilely poSl(lOned is
Ihe Superblock eOlleept rOT down-
lown.
The Superblock was going 10 be
developed by Raneon Inc., in the
vicinity or D, E, Founh and Fir",
streets, bul the company pulled out.
according 10 Henderson, because
Ibe (lOlenlial lender lor Ibe projecl
wanted verification lhallhcre would
be lenanlS for Ihe .1I0pS and
buDdings involved.
"JI used 10 be thai a developer
could jusl &0 OUI and gel
speculative 10311$ and hope lhat by
1M lime 1M project was compleled,
It would be sccared widl _II:
he said. "Those days are gone. It
just woo't haJlPCll. The lender wants
10 see and verily thallhe majorilY
of lpace available is reserved by
prospective lenants. Who can you
gel 10 eommil 10 an),thing in "'is
kind of economy? ,H Unless lhe
aaeIICJ is willinl 10 finance . po-
jetl 100 percent, there'l a lignifi.
canl chance dlat 111.: projecl may
,a.. 1
~,;.
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to voteyefbn the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~) /#~
,\
"l.
A~K
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
-A
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMA T CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~ (LW---
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
r~~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~QJ\,\Y1' ~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMA T CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
/lJ- f ~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMA T CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Since~y ,
(/dl/l9
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~/2/7
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
-Aft ~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~7
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
j,,Ik
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May-10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
C,5~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May-10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMA T CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~52
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sin~~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~r;rO.~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May-10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development wiII bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project wiII not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May-10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
d~~
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sincer' .
- :&JJ-
,
\
v
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMA T CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Si"=clY'~ 4!-dJ
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May-10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City in many ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
~~
.
May 6, 1993
The Honorable Valarie Pope-Ludlam
The City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: PROPOSED CALMAT CAJON CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
Dear Councilwoman Pope-Ludlam:
I am writing to ask you to vote Yes on the Calmat Cajon Creek project specific plan 90-01
on Monday, May 10th, 1993.
I believe that this development will bring value to the City inmany ways. Most importantly,
the project will provide much needed employment to the city of San Bernardino for years to
come, which will help our community prosper in the future.
As you know, San Bernardino has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state. I feel
that your vote supporting this project will not only create jobs for the community, it projects
a pro-business attitude which will encourage manufacturing retention in the state of
California.
Please vote Yes for this project to pave the way for increased prosperity in the city of San
Bernardino. Thank you very much.
Sinc~~
!,i
,J
.;. .'
MEMORANDUM
TO:
~ayor and Common Council ~ ~.
City of San Bernardino ~~Y1'-
Dr. James L. Mulvihill, ArCp
California State University, Sa Bernardino
CalMat Cajon Creek Specific Plan No. 90-01
(and related project documents and
applications)
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CC:
City Atty's Office; City Planning Department;
File.
DATE:
May 10, 1993
I am deeply disturbed by the lack of objectivity in
materials produced by staff for the Planning Commission
and the Council. Rather than presenting a thorough, balanced
review of facts, documents have consistently been slanted
towards promoting this project, and minimizing very real
threats to the community. The citizens of this community
deser'"e better; the Council must require reasonable
objectivity in the future.
Regardless of objectivity, given the lack of
substantial and consistent evidence in the record, it is the
Council's responsibility to deny this specific plan and
related applications. Verbal assurances made by the
applicant, along with lack of objectivity in staff's
documents, tends to blur this clear responsibility.
The overridins environmen~al issue is this: the EIR has
identified .h~.._ continuing significant negative
environmental effects that cannot be sufficiently mitigated.
The one I address here is in my view the most threatening to
the neighborhood and the community, that is, the
uncontrolled particulate and dust emissions. This'is a
obvious problem of all minin~ operations, and should have
been given priority given the predominance of single family
land uses in the area. 'The fact that the general plan
designates this tract as ~IE" is ..;th.... irrelevant (see
Appendix A, below) ~ presents the City with ,potential
liability for permitting incompatible land immediately
adjacent to the site (see Appendix B~ below)} The
particulate issue is crucial here because of the high winds
produced by"the Cajon Pass (no~ simDlv periodic Santa Ana
winds). Indeed, new, affordable homes exist within a few
hundred feet of the site's southeast boundar7 -- and
downwind from the project site. The danser here is that the
,
Page Two
MEMO: CalMat Proposal
May 10, 1993
i
I
I
!
removal of vegetation, along with the accumulation of large
piles of sand and gravel, will be provide dust and other
particulates to be moved across the ground and taken aloft,
degrading the air above these homes, much like a sewer fouls
a stream. (See Appendix C, below)
CEQA Requirements.
:EQA mandates the no agency should approve a project
for which an ErR has identified one or acre negative
environmental impacts unless accompanied by written findings
that: the project has been changed in a manner that
substantially lessens the significant environmental effects,
or that there are economic, social or other considerations
that make mitigation infeasible (CEQA Guide~ines 15091(a)).
This information is provided in the present document.
"aequest for Council Action Document" dated April 22, 1993,
Attachment I, ~xhibit "B", page I, entitled, "Candidat.
Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations..."
~owP'-r. staff fails to include the following critical
~ubsection "15091(b)", which states, "The findings required
L~. subsection (al shall be supported b}- ~lJb~t~nti~l -,.;r!(IIln~A
,~ th. r-rnrd (CEQA Guidelines 15091(bl, emphasis added).
Staff simply state that particulate effects have been
substantially reduced. The evidence does not substantiate
this. .Substantial reduction" must be related to how much of
~ particula~e ~.ission problem -~~R;n~. The documents
indicate an unacceptable particulate emission problem
remains. ..;" indication of the applicant's regard for. this
prabl"m, is pro'-.ided by a statement made by CalMat's PH
p~!'50f~ ;n r_~le San -q--na.-rlin" <:lln, Saturday. ~a~. 8. 1993.
"...that fears about the dust and noise are misconceptions
based on the old ways of minin~...Dust will controlled
ny...{folialie. lDonito;-ing, and ""ater).... rr '~'Ic:;;t /""'~tJld b@
:---r.;!"-"']'"",rf ~,,- ~#ll\A1;tt'~ ~",",,-hn("}1""'1i!'\.. \oih~ d~rln'... ("';:tl'1::t.t ;:tD~l,,"
1h:.;.: r",",r~:"'.....loSl"\.- du-~nQ' ""'A =iR ;a.nA.t..-<::;;q;. Especiall~.., after
the project showed negative particulate i_pacts in the FErR,
t..:"~'.- rHdn't (",,~1"'a.!" 'Dr~nll~p- thp- n..,. tlllac:~n~l~!!t""' a.nd ~hnl.: nil
n~~~tivp imDAr~s for ~hp ~~TR ~ddonrlllm ~hi~h ~a~ ~ri~~An in
FAh r'"UA 1'"'-.. 199.3?
Overriding Considerations.
Tn ~d9;t;nn to the "substantial reductions" of negative
environmental effects addressed by the written findings
described above, CEQA Guidelines 15093 require that any
remaining nega~lve impact be acceptable due to overriding
,
,
f .
Page Three
MEMO: CalMat Proposal
May 10, 1993
I
f
.
f
;
considerations. Attachment 1, Exhibit "B", Section 6, p. 39.
"Statement of Overriding Considerations," refers the reader
to Section 4, pp. 30-34, for the benefits composing these
overriding considerations.
Benefit 4.1.1 is based on CalMat's opinion. It
describes the project as resulting, "...in a harmonious
ph~-sical and visual environment,W (Exhibit "B," p. 31). I
wrote in my February 6, 1992 memorandum to City Plannine.
that for many years, traffic flOwing through the Cajon Pass
the first impression of our City would be of 125 foot deep
pits. This would hurt attempts to promote our city as
"livable.w
Benefits 4.1.2-4.1.~ focus on applicant's projection
that approximately 11800 jobs will be created by tbe
project. Rp~inA~ ~"A wor~ of t~_ ~Dnl;~~nt ~hp~_;~ th~
iU'l::~i~;~;qtinn fn..... ~hp~. ;ch~? ~nd wh". ha~nJt ~t.a.f~ ""AallA!I;.t:~d
such ;ll"tif;ca1"ion:' The applicant has been lobbying the
local business community very heaVily with these job
projections (S"n Ra"n"rdino Rll";n"..",, (February, 1993), p. 10
& p. 19). I have not been able to find adequate
justification for such projections. In addition, testimonT
by ~Ir. Douglas Sprague before the Planning Commission in
February 1993 indicated that many of these jobs would be
short term, and many wouldn't begin for sometime into the
future. Attachment 1, Exh1b.t -n", p. 34 provides the
followi"ng breakdown of these jobs:
li 5 million s~uare feet of light and heavy industrial
de'"elopment, creating 6,400 new jobs,
~: another 800 new jobs in extraction and related
construction materials U3ers,
3) -up to. 4600 jobs ~ew off-site jobs.
First, if the 4600 off-site jobs in :3 is correct, they
will not be lost if mining is den1ed at ~his site. In other
words, if aggregate users do not purchase from this CalMat
site, they will purchase it elsewhere, and most probably in
the Inland Empire. Second, the 6400 jobs projected in ~1, is
based on maximum build-out of the industrial land uses. Even
if true, much of the industrial land uses that these figures
are based on will not come about until operations cease __
in 25 years~ Lastly, the 800 new jobs in extraction and on-
site construction materials users is an estimate that no
one, other than the applicant, can justify. Actual
extraction and cement operations are automated and will no~
likely be over a few dozen individuals. It would be
,
,
f .
Page Four
MEMO: CalMat Proposal
May 10, 1993
extremely offensive if the applicant is grossly speculating
on job generation, especially given the depressed state of
our local economy. and the fact that, as the FEIR shows,
this project threatens hundreds of resident's homes and
family lives.
Regarding other "benefits" of this proposal, 4.1.6
projects S154,OOO annual sales tL~ at build-out. This would
hardly pay for the cost of increased road ,upkeep required by
this project. Also, the other projected economic benefits to
the RDA, do not show one cent of the social and physical
damage the project will cause.
Benefit 4.1.8, widening Cajon Boulevard, a traffic
signal at Palm Avenue, a sidewalk, and internal water mains,
storm drains are nothing mere than would be expected of any
development. It should also be noted that this
infrastructure is being heavily subsidized by grants
supported the San Bernardino's RDA. Benefit 4.1.9 shows that
the proposed project will generate sand and gravel to build
and maintain schools, hotels, homes, etc. As above, if this
pr~ject is not approved, sand and gravel will be obtained
~lse~here. But ml:rh mnr~ ~mnnr~~nt, it is citizens in
residential developments, such as the Cimarron, whose taxes
pay for schools. and who buy homes, shop in our local
~t~res. Benefit 4.1.9 fails to discuss the risk the project
pr~sent5 ~o our co~munit~.
F:naily, Benefits 4.1.5. 4.1.i, and 4.1.10-4.1.12 can
be ~ddressed by any development -- and very likely better
t~~~ the present proposal. In short, taking the overriding
cc~~id.rations together, they do not provide the needed
IJht~r:~~~ to jlJ5tify the con~~nl!ing nega~ive impacts described
:n the DEIP..
~orlclusion.
The responsibility of city government is to serve and
protect its citizens. In the present proposal, the FEIR
re"eals that the neighborhoods surrounding the site are
threatened with severe environmental changes. On the other
hand, the applicant has not justified why the City should
allow this threat to occur. The Cimarron development, lying
closest to the project site, is an affordable development
homes sell from $90,000 to 140,000. It is meant for first
time homebuyers -- young families, with children. T~ese
families have taken a chance in San Bernardino. Ther are
risking much of their financial future here, and bave a
tremendous stake in this community. They are the very
.' .
...
I,
r.
Page Five
MEMO: CalMat Proposal
May 10. 1993
families San Bernardino needs to attract and keep! The
choice is .::lear.
It is difficult to deny a project promising 12000 jobs
given the local economy. Is the environmental quality of
neighborhoods worth the risk of turning do~n this proposal?
The Supreme Court pro~"ides the follo~inC:
The concept of the public welfare is broad and'
inclusive...Tbe values it represents are spiritual as
~ell as physical, aesthetic as well' as monetary. It is
within the power of the legislature to determine that
the community should he beautiful as ~ell as healthy,
spacious as ~ell as clean, well balanced as well as
. carefully patrolled...Miserable and disreputable
housing conditions...may indeed make living an almost
unsufferable burden. (SA...."'.n '" ""rker, 348 U.S. 26, 75
S.Ct. 98 (1954))
APPENDIX A
Conformity with a city's general plan dop~ nn~ insulate
a project from conf~rmity with CEQA (c;tv or ~nr.in~h v th~
C-l t,. Cnun~i 1 ~f' tho (",i t". of Pi tt~hllr~h (1986 J 232 Cal.Rptr.
507, at p. 510). a statement that tbe remaining significant
effects on the environment are acceptable due to overriding
concerns 1~~Q~ GllidplinA~, See 15091-150931. Thus, tbe
approval of this project is still discretionary, and the
propoged overriding considerations become crucial to the
proces~, and I will discuss those below. .
This site is designated "IE" because city's land uses
must be comprehensively zoned -- whether developed or not.
rt is important to remember that, "An owner of undevelop~d
land.. .has no vested right in existing zoning," (~
r"..,mmlln~t". n~,.,.l~n_r.:; Tnp . South -r'lHlqt Rp~;nnAl
!".omml~~;on (1976) Ii Cal..3d ;85, quoted in Giltil~nti v.
Lount..: ,"')f' Tn!!; .\nl1plplCt (1981) 179 Cal.Rptr. iJ, at p. i8).
Vesting only occurs ~ith project approval, and substantive
beginnings of the operation. This issue is recognized by
City Planning Staff and CalMat. "Vesting of mining and
processing rights within the area covered by C~P ~o. 91-31
(~RAs 1,2 and 3)...~ill occur upon initiation of work (site
preparation, aining...(CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific
Plan ~o. 90-01 let all. Attachment "B-2", p. 30, Planninc
Commission documents).
~
- "'
;
,
\
I
!
i
I
i
Page Six
MEMO: CalMat Proposal
May 10. 1993
~
APPE~DIX B
The approval of single family residential adjacent to
mineral extraction sites is inconsistent .ith the City's
General Plan (City of San Bernardino General Plar.. Goal LOCo
p. 10-20; Objecti,e 10.8. Policies: 10.8.2. 10.8.6). Thus
City may be liable if homeowners adjacent to Cal~at project
site choose to take legal action against the City. I belIeve
the State Mining and Reclamation Act has directives similar
to the City's General Plan.
APPE~DIX C
The proposed wind response plan is inadequate for truly
mitigating particulates. The plan proposes to ceaae
operations once an hOlJrlv wind speed of 20 .ph is shown by
on-site gauges. Sand particles begin to .ove at
approximately 16 mph, and winds blow in gusts. The response
plan will not be implemented if a 40 mph gust, strong enouch
to lift sizable amounts of dust and sand into the air. blows
fo[O 15 seconds. then subsides to 15 mph for 90 seconds.
Additionally, ceasing operations will have no affect on
3topping sand and dus~ from exposed open pits, and sand and
gravel piles.
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
prtnt
.~n
.~n
Prtnt Namo B
<;;;:....".~ \ "-"1 "^' ,.., <t."'-
Sign NafM;
Prtnt Namo
.~ Namo
Print""'"
SlgnNaml
Print Namo
SlgnNaml
PrlnI Namo
.~
PrlnI Namo
7,k/
I~
~
t<< Vj-l U:
I'? ~ ~
~61.e. (l.
B9Co (lfVt ~y
OQ.()or Q. / CQ
890 K /M;$A~I( !'lOt?
G'1/ 0 =
/j>/ 10 ,Kvv~0-f7b
G-G-vo-le. ~ 1 (A-, f 7-<1-0 7
/ ~')'?l $"'''f~ J<'tr ~vc.-
(}ctI(JI(UC C&- fJ. '+()"/
CJ9'/ C,(--rO IV
vO((':: 6 7
f~5 fU~au.L ~177
3' - ,3/~ f3
~~~/- 9 ~
D . t .
S:---<;O~.s
~-~O-9-3
3 -30 --9J
$- 30-13
"'5 -J'o-'l:r
-:> ';s 1-C(3.
3-:)(-73
0\ 1') P..'\fC)/l"r:..
[y..JVIL CA "i "L '-( <.>?
q., S De "'Or'<-
\::Ie "-or<e.. t c..c... "'............0\
\~~\O C~~~t-.l - C1-%lc5
~\I0vE CA qZ.42"":i
Li-I q:3
-4-1-<13
~ - I-~ 3
r a ~<'--c=~
~ 2- 0
J'l<"Z-o (;tJlM1\A&) k%
6-- 124D -II
/M-C v/t":
J'it#Ydf< &&- r/J~
93
. J. 13
/f,-( ..?f!/
;s
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents ofthe.San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
~.. +
D . t .
...
P'"
SlgnNaml
P"''''''
'1u93- ~ ~j'
S/f? -ti7,i(~-
"'7 z,/S-7S
3- _
38'( - S-c-tCl~-
L/_ ,/_
Sign Nan; '"
(Z.M.,w
/
SlgnNaml
17 73 ~ K~~wOC'() fiE
Dt:eCRr: 12.'ftJ7
IfY. )'i
~g1-'t~7
~ 3
/'5
P"'''''' -40 hN (!~A 1ft? ,c/\(J,; /?,"-
Print Nan.
2Pr.
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
P!an 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
SlgnNaml
.rinl"",
PrlnI Name
3A
""0'0"'""7 c;-u co C/' Q oQ. ./I-' w DC>
-e..vov-e. 9?z<-{cJ'7
I "t't's-I
D . I .
4-{_Ofj
...., ..J -l:l3
enD s- Cif\~/lYl
~, CA. C1').-l.f07
[ ..Q.~,-"\ ~'<.
S C?
\(I..\~ -:pot: \)ofZ-"i..
-pc..uou-
1445 r;~ Yflt1A.- vrz-.-
o
q ~ k ~M [?~JU~
O~(h;2--i3 .
837 /Lrn-f'Ad'
Lf,'"5-'1s
4- 3 -73
y-Jo..U
-'3-'\3
tf'() 7 A1~6..rk
..[J.e. Y (J lie.. C/t
1-4-1a
Z-WI
1~I"o k~Y"\WU:l
D.ru.>ore. (~ q'l..l\<J I
'7 <; SuC"KtwrJ-1\
-(VJ {k v4"Z I
\'f"1SU ~ )..t
.D~
L/ -4- q 3
4!-/ -9 ?>
4-J....-9 j
J!'
@
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
AcId.... ~ / ><
I I]J-.2C1 (JiI!et',vi-WIT<>r C L..
;:J.ev'''L 92.~1
/15">-- br:;~^,,(4/DD~ ~
9 ::ul<
Slgn~
Print Namo
Sign Namt
Print Namt
S~nNamo
Print Namo
SlgnN..,..
PrlmNamt
IlgnN.,...
Prim Namo
L{P-.
D . t .
'i/'/?,?
-'I' a ~
Lf /zro/Jj
€.{/-zc"lr3
~6 7'3
'1- J~ -9~
Lj-:6 - '1..3
l./ /~~ /f 3
}{)
~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Addr...
o . t .
1?'1311f(~aw.~( (fA.
~ ;;levPKe
/%/~ /J$/Yt#t:?C?r/~ e"".
17~/P ke.Y...o6A..Av# Oa~r~ (p,
"?J4,p
'f'f q 3
~-//- 7'3
Lf -If ...p J
Prlnt~
SlgnNaml
PrO< Nome
Sign Name
PrlnlNaQ
SlgnNaml
PrO< Nome
Sign Name
Print Name
Sign NamI
Print NamI
SlgnNaml
PrO< Nome
Sign Nome
Print Nanw
Sign NamI
Prlnt Nan
Sign Nu.
Print Name
5"A- .5
-...
"
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon ~reekP{Q1ect
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and RMwsld8 c:ountie& anct
cities therein, wish to go on record 88 being opposed to any .and all' mining or rnIniAg.related
activities, Including any purported industrial developments, as propcttct by the CaI._ Specific
Plan 80-01 and any amendments related thereto.
o . t.
"
.1,.
41.
Lj./.;2 -q:;
'1-/1- ~.$
-73>
SIgn_
p,,",-
SIgn-
--
SIgn -
p,,",-
SIgn ....
--
SIgn-
--
SIgn-
--
SIgn - .
'<:>.,"
--
foA
/' (7"LY ----= I
------ ~ --.".."",-
g
,
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We. the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related .
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific',
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
P~""
~u~.i:It_'T' h. Kt:.,,1'-
Add,...
GK~. 01"J)L/o:oJN A.,~-.
. (1 ~
. C,.. 1.;:' ~"/d '1,,7
o . I .
:; ~')3
[;- 2.1]
."
5"' z-~.s'
5, 2.- c";3
G~:2.. _c..~
SlgnNaml
PrOt....
S~n""
Print Nan
SlgnNam.
Prlnl NamI
SlgnNaIM
PrOt....
Sign NamI
Prine. Nan.
S~n""
Print Natre
Sign Nan
PrlntNamt
SlgnNamt
PrlnlNaml
7A
f
,
r
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
....-
A..r."~/ZtfoAt-~ r; 1).
RFi>o ~~ W'Y
3/"z?p Ae-B ,f/,fl,?iP- ..7.-e/ rC-
'f-ZJ~.d:P~ (!/<1 ;?? /' Y
S/P p~ ~
I?......;~./.AY; LBA/, '12.-.3 7.3
/P f
. -
Sign~
....-
o t-.f v>=. J... (1..""-' s 00
/C)a~- ~.-&:
D . I .
.?--.2~- ~:3
.3- 2-",(- 73
30 - ~1" 7J
3'
x
'0
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Add.... "I'r (} 'I
.J<I\ 8 a. M. C...
"\.,~ ~ ~"'- '1:.""
Q..~
~~3f/ c.~
/i:rI ~/~~/~
<...(--z.rl::,
-'13
5 - ,(;)-93
Sign Nun.
PrlnINomo
SlgnNam.
PrlrtNan
SlgnNarM
Prim Narnt
SlgnNarnl
Print Nan
qPr H
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments. as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Sign Name
Add,...
~JdS- And /lve.....
n?I4S r. .'1.)1/<.1 1-2F--"77
,-:2 'f Sf) j ~
~~1~9~'5 Lr-77
Q 'I~C) 3~;t7 ;1(~
~/J R~Jd Cot '7,,2..~~ 3-a jJ -93
.:z.27 ( 0# d.!....... '5r
,/ . 1
o .1 .
.NO Homo 0
}- 21-'7.J
'5- 2~-9]
7.~:'. , . . ~
-.-' ., l '-.J
SlgnNamt
L/-f2-C?3
t/2/13
""..Homo
SQA Homo
Print NarnI
SlgnNlmt
Print NarnI
SlgnNarM
1 DH, ".5 w,,-'1
" .i-SO b
4 ~ 9.S
~
loA
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents oftheSan Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments. as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Sign Homo
PIInI Homo
t l /\
"'dr... /?oo
ex co/e)!.,[ D.' .
.,-1?-73
r.1e vo-
J 91M B!..e;x' (&[.'.: IF!-
t>
f'3
6
(}r-YnlJ~d ~
3-'':;)5- r3
,~~\ X'< I M.bo-r-\<. l0Ie
~
53l.{ vJ.\J~'f\ Koe.ue.r-i~
. ~ '237k-
().O. ~L.\'2...
~L\(T-O~) CP,. o.."J...'Q..')
3-:15-q3
3-;j.s4rs
~-25~ 0{)
\<0'3\ \ S::>s\.~-Ve.
~C:X e Co... <=\&I...\.t>"t
I. ~/ ..$A//Z' I'e /~.
"'oil i c J'/ 9.:J-f() 7
/ fI'/t:::). /fex Qrea
8d"~- Ca.. 7"'''I-P
::~~)7 3 f:., , c.
~
\~'l;G 0YC\vD0'eV--> A~
00~ C4 00
\ r'-l';).3 '\7\'" 0,-e.vJ ~~
'\ Pr 0/)
;)..~ '13l-otj~
.~ ';l
577L c.hru;tcfOh..rr
:See.'\.. 6.erY'l<<nJ,' VLO CA... W)/f(J7
1;;1 8' a-- K. o'Y> arl<.
De.ff('t CA- '1.;;;'10
)
3~ .;8---'+3
3 -.;;,p--y?
3 ~.;l5~ ~
g-~-13
3-d-'l~7t5
:3 . ~..(}- 9.:=,
/'
J~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
A..r'''I3/~Jn~ ~,
D . I .
3-1'1- 93
/,3/ I,p Mo tilPAI f\-1I6.
/ CA. q.Hu7
It q 1 vY\ARlui-..) i'\\J ~
IZ...~ q '- '{ \:)
II q..., MAfVo,J -A.Jr; .
~r:; / Ctl-. qd-<l()7
/ :ZfJ-o ~ ~
~tfo
?;-11-q3
~- / <]_ci]
3-1(1- q3
3-/r-7.
d-/'j-j
3-/7-/5
.3-;11-1,3
-2./ -~5
~/ 73
"1-;;1-/
SlgnNlmt
PrInI_
8"'-
5- - 8
l~ 6
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riversid,e counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any ,and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
I/E;tJ OE D. t.
q,zt!o t.3 ~
~#f
3/~.;;/7 3
tA- q).<{~ 5 -;).8, '13
3- Ji-93
- ?-? -7
5 -;t. If -C;..7
033/23
\fJ~
/
J~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
n
Addr...
Cf7tJ
~(O H//I'1Fie:/c1 lvoJ
D.uOlt.l? c.,. "f~t.fo
755 H/(.~yr=I'e4.0 ~
tkvdRe. eA. 9~ ~a}1
7~-;;' 1-/;1l!:J -t:G:tLJ /.;. t1 .
~1I()~ eft. Q;;u.p7
7.s~ 1'1- '//~-fIC t.1lJ.
.P ev~ re., l!-~' 9~o 7
7SS
.~n
77) !-Idly H/!-t-b /;.1-'
'6 VI) /l r; ~ I'r q J-C/ ~7
77~ H'//y 1('1 One-
f)eclDr~ elf 9;)'10'1
PO..
P.... Namo Bo ""l\~ 'i- \" r \.AS L er
SlgnNamt _
Ils'd?~ E'A""<-~
C..-1-v ~I.(.q
POId Namo
.~n
.~ Namo
po.. Namo Be..-'
JLfA
o at;/..:z, 11'3
3 -.:l.\- 9'3
3 ~,;zJ~93
-
..3-,;//-'
- "t~
3- d-I - ~.,
3-2/- P3
3 -OlJ -'} '?;>
3 -2-1 . '1.3
?>-:J/-
J-v/-l3
3',;JI-Y.!>
3-'?/-73
J. -). (-73>
-P3 't
/
)!J
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
, ~ ~,1J~
F ~I' 'f5.- A..~ ~ ~:a-<< J7.r ~
, ~~~13
~ 1- ~-4J "3 -1- 4> .-'1'.5
/ rEA-- '1 )4. ~ J-
o . t .
-g - J (p(},3
p
I 0 ~6- AJ2.v. ~ 35'0 !
~-t:J eN 9';<5''-15- 8 ;l(P 73
3'6 50 ~hlt # d.-70
. a 9;}3 'f ' /:J.f- r 3
I ~ c.R.ON.r- 'J::)~ E.
,a\V~&..'t>J; ~~a' 3p.t. ~
..);jbl, ~~O )k/~
~A't./ B!. ~ or
g:J.!J V/~rJl D/(.
StfN
11f.S- ~- <{ ( . .
~ 3/~"'/~
11f)~ c, !.jt9:;S-t, S, I
P..........
'"
..i -J..t. - 7' ~
Pflnl rurr.
i-(O\ ~Q('-'~ cf-
, €e.<(lIIcur.('-1"O C6t tl.2-J.l-olj
'163 2../1- 9"?Q3
/3 eJ1t-( -n 0 ,,/
':'f7~..1'~
&.~, q:l-if",
I~{"t:::,~~
.:sJi>{ 8.to,-
8'~~
~-B-
)fs-O E, 1f-tICo-A1l1c. -JI:)3]
I-I-f ~ 9.1,.1<1-6
~ -Lir <1s
s~.
P...
3' -:2.? - .9'3
3-..{h -93
..J - ..;2 t.- 9 i.
SlgnNaml
J-M -.Q3
15ft-
IS'
r;~
~~)
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
'Y -'
... ."'
1o.1"-,t "II-
1"',> ~
,,'~',.. f?- PrinI_
~!t.Jt>\
or' IunName '
7~33 /7lL--~ ~
33 .s~
o . t .
!JI?-/ 9 3
:3/;;2-/ -B
.
3-;23- ,/3
~ -~3 - 9~
J-::t?~
3- ~ 3-'13
I Z HZ. t()UI 1_ 1'1..
~/.......u e'er.. 9Z37~
~ t/~13 e.,;- ,.)7,,)0 f) A L.fl, to
:\-.l.~-'13
"3-~~ 3
,J-.23-f'3
3-~-'f.3
~/?-..bJ 1.3
.-
/.[;J .s- c:< Oa-.wl "--'" ~
7? ( !... (~J((
,,,Sf) 13~
ec= ~ &..
/ "4
I ~ c;; i i ti :J. fu ~e.5
)t
..' J
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record ~ being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
D . , .
5-
3/,1/13
3- ~. '1:5
.3 - ( 1'-1-
3- iK/'P
I 3-/~-~.J
CA q2J(o') 3-lt -93
5-1::,
Z.
.{
'3 tl3
'3
1"'"{''':3,
...........1) OT
//c:> ? KIYP~ s7;
.LYE VORE. C. L; p r;?.z,
3(;
3h; h'3
~~/~
Sign......
II t\-
..,-
J2>
~.~
0;"
/
--/
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments. as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Addr... ~ ~ B
o . t .
C
~d.% Kifl'.'oos K 1\1J\.
y ~ 3 .~3
Y -~~9~
~
'7 3 '1~
Lf-3 '73
f/-3 -jJ
'(-3- 93
"
If-3-?3
? /
&:..- . 3-23
30/7 fo M 64/f,(' C;LJ-;7J
Vt..- //0. C:- /.L
1/'<77 10/f/f Ij /1/ '7"- )- 7J
L-<t-- cpr- e",-
/77t) ~ ~~ t/- 3-9 3
'tJV
/tI-&f ;twlf
t;. f-;? f"?
q3::> DtJlI <er f4-q3
f ~A }6
,/
/
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any ,and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
I. .
Sign .....
PO....... B L.L W ({ tfeS d)€
l'1A
Add'... c-
{<tv".} fflql'lo'lJ ,4v-e
,o.f' ea. "
11t.ft. '7rJ /I,i Ifl- 1It>V
e..1I tJ1.A-- tl4 9 ~b
C"f(J, AI/ e
C-A ., L.'rtJ ,
I r.J<l } p( 1JlA.~ t'1.v.."
k (f 9~f'-tJ"
/5'5'f' ,,414 /l/<!?A/ 4Y~
,oEv<!?~&;:' e::.4. 7"-<0/'15 ~
D . t .
'/ ~ c; _
;./-4-90...
-'1- 't s
'+- -<< -'?J
~-9'-?s
I s-~J' --;?nCC/II?;T:()oV
D~V"'I~C- €A
wo-'dc y-e>S
t? t:( 9:2. <fO ,.,-
(;.~~UtJ"d ~
~- y. "1
~-~-93
-j- '13
ue.
,3
..F= 3-93
~. ro'Ve.
Po C\ b
3 ')3 ~ R l'b6<.U-ve 1Y<>,
fA... .,J 0 cA-
/$'51 N', ftIVNS'Yt-vI1/l1t/t
t!-4l--rofll; t.A '1.2.:?.:L
[ ... 3~ 13
S - ~-)'~
S--~J-'13
/
J~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
CT-
8~n
5
8~
5 - a -1
SlgnNarM
P'" -.;V
5 -~ - f J
!J-- 3 -:} 3
5~~-Cf S
6<~.
'ViLu-'tck )W
8~_ (,14'> I
~~ 7J.l.f()
/
2Ef\ r
10
Add,... r~ l. ~
~.
'\-~ -93
4--LJ-q3
.,J/ ..~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
,
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 01 and n)l dments related thereto.
/vcJf'"Y-
S~n
(1'05<..:> c r4 -::> 0>-'> "i3 <-\JD
'DCJ ~i?-c:
~ '6';<. /111191-'< !(
(') € ;?
3054 Jo- ~.
S
IfSY 0,0
'J/ 3//'13
Ii!...-
~
G 7L~
I ~() i" i" ~I<.J..-
L4.u <1U!.. [,4 '1.;L r ()
~{.6 -/& TT~ /~,
1f)tW~ I ~- ?.;L-f0r-
<?\o\c \-),' \ ''1 f, t: I D Lu-
De v llfWL
!Oq1 W,t.{IJT $.~ OA
qz..l\:O"l
q - c2..-q' 3
Sign NarN
Y-Z7.-73
L(-;).'2 ~
7'-,;2.-.. ~r.3
PrlnINan
~- '2."2--9?
4- ~2-q]
'"
PrlnINan
11'(3 l{ M~y;~1 "'~Io\.e
SI'b <f1..'l ~
Lj-J,5' q3
Sign N.".
S~Nan
Print NamI
/~~-~3
IS
21ft
~
7:2 0
Petition ..,..... Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to ariyand all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Add....! -5 7~ U~rX &t-d-
e.
~~l SE@...u_9 c t+
5
D . I .
A 92J1.~
~ ,/ :.v C-:.<
/rog-~ CauiY1 I3lltJ *0
3-30- '-3
3-30-9'3
2-3) -j'j>
'3 30- 'B..
S-3<9~q~
~- 3C- '':3-
IX) } -}cJ ~?'1
3-30 -n
Sign Nome
PrInI Nome
. 0-7~
SlgnNaml
5~ $'u-CfL
)- 30-9'3
3- 3 0 - 7 5
PrlnI NarN
Sign Nome Jl
P...Nome gD SG~ A
L.-Z-A
i
.l'Y
/'
J~
I> '
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
..d.... /:?P/c7 CTAJiM/ ~
-YE~~E I L'.4. 'f?1"p7
,,:. I S acJ'\( ff1 QlI~
~"QI1b CPlC &f;371.
I ~~OCJ
1- e vore e~. <1/?'/o 7
<rt 7~u",41~ sf'-
/4e-/tM c.... ""~~ 7 /
D .1 .
f/~-- ?
~;/6113
0//6/'73
~?-73
1
- ,.y
~~7~
Lj-t;-93
1- ~-'13
l{, - <b -q3
4--6-93
1- f!J-'1;5
G;41p
o
~-"'r 1
Sign HarM
.... Nome
SlgnNaml
Print Nunt
)"'3Pr
J3
,
.
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
......../.;J,i'l I'\'\<>-\'-/o....~.
'bwov--<.; <A- 9 "J-IIiJ7
1/16 m;1;K:/ 0 "u
Obt/O-;ey, t!44
o'5~ 41tl80weN.
If I G-ttLf\-N 0 . QJ\-
o . t .
3 '"3/-<;3
3- 3 /-<9'.3
If
J-,J-~7
~
e.- %;~6 '7 3-3/-'73
6-3/-73
-S - 5"1- 2:.r
3-3/-93
w.-~-t5
oft....
7 LjO ~ Vi e<=f)o ve .
d-w Cu~(\! q 103
q3~ Wb'bJ.
'{-)- rS
ool..f<> AI. F ';;r;
SflA.J ISIJ f,./ ~.
S--S-Sf3
]::)
r;,
~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
L, .~..-...J ........"
n
P'" .....
S~nNaml
p,.. .....
S~n .....
Print Nan
Sign NarM
P'" .....
SlgnNaml
PrlnI Nan
SlgnNaml
Print NamI
SlgnNaml
PrlnI Nan
SlgnNaml
.... .....
SlgnN.,...
PrInI NUN
.....rI'30? ~n-..s:r
,ocr('dU- C'1't/. <J"Ztl()7
.dUo-r"""......'''",.... Sl
,.,... "t '" '-. "'" A C ,If ,. ,. "
-Sf.
c.A q~l
IH1..t a. rt- ,J t .
MJ. 9.2-1'7
o . I .
3- ~/-'3
'l'-ll~~J
3 - 2-1 - ?$
3.. ol/ - '18
.g!.:Jllf3
3/;)J/r5
~
=7
\
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents oftheSan Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-r~lated
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto. I
j
d~
D . t .
p...-
n
Print Nan
-
n
Prlnl~
Sign
p...-
SlliIn Nanw
P....-
SlliInNanw
Prlrt Narnt
SlgnNurw
p...-
Sign Name
Print NaINI
Sign Name
p...-
Slgn_
PrInI Nanw
SlgnNu.
Prtnt_
SlgnNalM
Print Name
J
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proQ(lsed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto. (
1
.~"
P"'''''
SlgnNaml
Print Name
Sign Name
P"'''''
Sign rum.
P"'''''
Sign Name
P"'''''
.~....
Prlnt NamI
.~....
PrlI1I....
Sign Name
PtlntNaml
.~....
Print NamI
A.....:r-..2 S- 7 y. +: S" r
51 __..,~,(c-. G-
Jd5'f~~~.5f:J
:1- '17'1 '/7, ~cMf.. .
A c.vn ~ tzA-cU ~ C'''' 9'1. 'I {/(
D . t .
.J- 2.)... /3
...1-07..l-1'3
,
5/-12 :13
/' .
r1......,
3..
,,3-.5tJ~~
~ ~d017
11'1/= IIO~
073
~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents oftheSan Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
s~n_\.
Print HarM
S~n_
Print Namt
SlgnNlml
PrlnlNan
SlgnNIrM
Acid,...
o . I .
_~ -'l3
'2l t::.2..1 5.4- 0;"" /2;:;' O!- ~,'
,.::1;>;>1': f/PuEr (~,4 9). gd~
1401> BQ,nTOY\ ?"OO,cl "Z.loiSl
1 lA(\C\') Q
.6'3'1.3 G?o"o,()tJ~/1P11- JJ .
SliP -;du/llI1Rf)/#IJ, C/I 9:zW
/fZd5/
~,rAw.
'd.S'J' c.l.w'" V_He...
3/2
.:;
3-2 -
2'4 -'1:3
~tJ.?I33
.J.~4' 93
3~,,1'13
I'}v.
154S't nP-6&lJlT"f.
v1crOfl-VIL.t-f c/tj
S'7c.l f... rc/"h.
f~ ~4e..--.,... I
'fJJ'1:L
c..A"
c...... 9 Z 7'4>
)S
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
pi 90-01 and an mendments related thereto.
Sign Name
PO....... M,4~K C.
Add'...
{.)eJ/of!.t;
D . t .
9 -.13 -93
3'd3-93
lfJOb
S" )o~ G' p ct;:.,-".......,.. 0;2. '5 B 3'-"J.-"3 -0; 3>
:s (Q Colf- 11/. Lu~ 0 v:\v E:.
<;o..V'\\M<'\.o. Co... 'j1.'-l04 :, -'2.:<::,-93
"3 \ 0 I ~EVl LS JJ'Io'tJ
SA,.. ~A,..d 'IoJO CA. 9Q40'7 ~-~'!.^9;3.
3(8)( /J(;"7/[~ "'f>dIY
SAt( 8Delyt:VeIU/Vd (h.tJ'.24tl 5~Jl3-c{3
/ 'I iN {J.1Z4A1PV/EW At/c-.
051/-/11 13fii~A"A{?f>IAI" e.. 411 3-(;23-t3
::3~ r~ rt!'.s D~v"
I !,J.j,t ..4 .3 h 3 . J...3 -'1 3
~<:':" (!('a.,f.~,)"~/~~/n..~I';I/ j ~/V
'I> ~ C:a.. 9'~J1' C /"""
3.1'30 MDdE.fk f),J,
S I.Jdo. ~R-, 9~"tI
Lte~?~.
.3 -,;2-3-93
I.
I
~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents oftheSan Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
F:
&nnf!.N
~:t;..._
r A- r ""oil.
Addr... A '"'
140 ;';"1,-1>" '-1'
7</TP H C", 9.:l473
/1/75 8eAI/TA J]-e/I"E
f7E/<-e/S C'// 9:<5' 0
52rl ~riJ sJ.
/fillerS/de, CI'l 9:l.So(.,
II 7 " It! ilIA (~ ;4... /(
t) IE. (/0 Ie. '- / G "'t r '2..'( 0 7
/I'.r3 1<""".. ,6;i?~qLf
,t:J.l!-PO"'~' (!A.. 7.r ~ cl
I? 16 J> ;...I/llo~€ sf J.}1f/,ve..
J}e.lloJf(e., C /; "?;2..yo:7
I? 16';:- f.//I/cA?es"'" Olf/I/.L
J;?eveJRe, (},1., 9:"~()?
\'7f.1l'1 FQ.,IV'VI<l......
n",- -t.."" c,,- c:r
17~/" FI/II/?vll-=W
foN'(. eA ~ ':). :3 13" ~
~:J. r If"pp R
C. .:2.3~
9 -;.. 2- b- Pep r>el(
I-~ IV t AlVA - CI7 - tf2. "3 ~::r
B/~ uJ. 'H" ~
o . t .
.3-.:/3-93
.3-:<':3-'13
.........
LOIS
3-.;13-9'3
,...1.-3-1]
j. -.;Li,,'7 J
t- S-- 93
~- S"- 93
If-G - 1'3
1.../-
Sign"'"
Sign"'"
.........
J
Sign Nan
.........
Sign"'"
.........
~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat SpecifiC
Plan 90-01 and any amendments reiated thereto.
P
S~n
P","
P","
S~n
Prl..
Prl.._ /(rGis71!AJ ~rJaA Gvnn
Wx.-O .
Add,.,. D . t .
fd-1.2 E/..#J/LJ" .$J:z
e..", "OocYj Ri Sf) 3- 2~-r
10 I ~ I'lL w,' 110 w ft Ii e- .
a"19 E"f<I'df-
.iT.
J-24-
" It /7tJ 3 -;;I - CJ3
::l--:J-4~~
B
~/p tV;;? st. 8,(3. t!j,Pf(J!; 3- n~13
3 -Ol.?' ~'13
Z,2/fft,{) (.d,v-cDv1-tJ . ,T q 2-:n 3-Z~f3 .
u1;,J.f:, 5 ~-
/1 7~ . II-) S--r C:VU -1 ~
1#3q PenaU: Ave-
f,/CVlcL CA 90t'3 <-/(Q
Co~90 ~
c.-p. 9~cJ?
/
wOqs rn.~ley Aue
$.a.y, 13-0/1 f'O/\d Ct a ffi Cj.;l.
60;73/1ck1h}ey A vI
SA /Y 15j)A/O.
3 ~_'()
I~ ~ ::>r
C/~ ">> -,;).{rf,
"---'
gl/-!-l7t.(w
ri~ rf-/7t./h
~(O.2--3l t\~
Z5t2.. ~3/'l-8
".
)0
. .
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, .QA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents oftheSan Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities. including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
/'/68'~
S~
1I3q Kimbo..r Ave...-
Devors-, CA Q2i..i 07
'i2d
SIgn_
Slgn_
....- &rel61J 11/01411
9 ;rSY3
Sign run.
~~.
Pnnl Nan
SIgn_
PrlntHanw
PrIm_
SIgn_
PrIm_
o . t .
-24--93
J -.?r;- U
3-2'i -'13
3~,).- ~
3/~4/flS
~/~ cr3
t/- tt: -7:5
j - ;: -'13
s: ~ -'7 ~
S--3 - '7:3
6-:5 L)3
6- !>~9.)
s- s - Y$
15
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents oftheSan Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities. including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
. }
PrOd Name
S~nName
PrInl Name
S~nName
PrOd Name
~ )/:2-9'9-.5
03 J- 5J'R3
b3/~/~
~:-o-; 93
'5/z':>- 3
312-~/~ ~
3-;;?J? -'7.::3
5;<5-~3
3-as-93
j:{
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
"
SO"
Sign NamI
Print Namt
Add'... D . I .
10\"),,0 "iX>~~'e-R. \(\U~\'- ,
C.\\~U'\ ~~u.,,~ C:f\ ~~3 3-&.5-'73
"). ")3 /f N)J If' 1/J-I7) IV 11,/
G jJ)I, -r ~ - 7-S--'13
f6:;'/' BLvr'he 4v&.
J M
339/ b arJl~~ 9'~3~
II
31/~ ' ~f#
3-::6-Y3
.3 -.2:{ - J
-d~-c;3
12-V()~
J.~lto/
pI/. D'
:3
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any .and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
- LV ,if- 'b. ~~
A...... ISo... u g e.-\j V-d" <:!-: '^-o eel" D. I .
p... .....
3-~-9.3
J/~/13
PIInI NIrM
.
p... .....
~.
Print Name
Sign Narrw
p... .....
SlgnNarM
p... .....
SIl' .....
Print Nanw
Sign Name
PrintNu.
Sign Name
PrlmNarN
Sign Name
p"", .....
SIl' .....
Print NamI
Sign"'"
Prlnl Name
Silo .....
Prlnl HIJN
_3
.~-,
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, "PROTEST THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY
WHICH IS KNOWN AS SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01 IN THE CITY OF
BERNARDINO AND WOULD ALLOW MI AND MINING RELATED
IN THE CAJON CREEK. AS
OBJECT BECAUSE IT WOULD
SAFETY AND WELFARE REASONS.
CALMAT
SAN
ACTIVITIES
WE
ALTH;
P"'~(eft Do,,,,,,,
")
,J
81gn_
-
81gn_
Pltnl ,.".
_....
I i:I 3'
&50 (6v 00vO\ 'P"""Je",,,,, cA
101
'~47;" S; C<..uJU s, ('tA . "
J cA II -l- c.. . - c, 1 ;:1]0")
.
9'1-107
D
C' f\ '1645"'1-
"lOCI)
;:.'\
"i h \01(\6 \ CA..
I S()5 ..' fQrtC &> 1/&
5a" t>~o a',,("" c./ti- C'f/lf'O?
<9000 U""ver's,M.\ p()r'VvJCt/-j
~~ v ~e(""'rOl;l\O (A <rz"107
'I ;;1IC,1
'(.L'-(o)
ha. LUYl '^- L.-(
D. t.
3/28/13
( I
-, - ~
.) ;18 7r/
,..0 '\ I ",'j.
<1 ~\ ,," r..-A. I.:)
Lf JJ- rlJ
{; " 'LI- -13
I c.:-
--
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
~n
PrlnINotnI
Add,..
f3~ Lv, c:li~d st
D . t .
777a/L,C;? /'Jti--
t.f~7-q'3
Lj-Df-?S
c(-9-Cf3.
'-1- '7- ?
,
r'/</'" ~ ~ '
.5'",:2';< g4A?"/4Rt:V/V~/c:.-q9.Z-
).5 ;). ~ - Av-<-
Sa..... ~ 'P-'fl>) 5hh3
L "-/ Ii D .~ rs t- ,Q " L
S'"-,, ''B~rn<t-rd;.,,' CI9/;c'iJ...> 1"-9 -9J
q
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and ail mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported Industrial developments, as proposed by the eal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
-
:;s~ fotrrltlLl...- ~Lvp
/(51 ~ -
D . t .
-~ q,G:!3
:5 -02'1' -
,3-Z -
3- H- '13
'3 zq
Sf, .3 -;L1-fJ
3-.;2. 7-73
S ..;t?- (3
3-~9-93
3-aq -V
"'3/0)0,1 is
Add r...
/1
20 1<:0'1/1 JJ4.,^" ,Q~
.;277:> j../(1-<J rc ~N c !;;:
'~l.L':""
PrlnI_ CAI2-LA- \~l EL..
~(/ v..ooouw..)
iLl.SVZ)(U.~ (p+
"-r, & C;;;~~Wi
D-c-v'^Z
18[(llAAv\i2-I~L
cz-f 0"(Lt::- )-1.[/71
~~o n
~
S~n_
PrlnI_
81gnNaml
~ 30 1
PrlnI NamI
f>O-'7'S,
/~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
A$'..h-r8" ~ sf- S'a--n ~ ~~ ~- '13
73~ 93
Jf-I-1~
y ~ I "0.')
P
/ ><./ s" t:.<J,,",.4,QiSK ""'ifr'
R,;n-f;;~ e.4 "71-3/6 0/--/ -- 'I ~
"1/;; L rrt
Stl.N tJ~/,h)iLl"c4",,~ t'A.. 9;WI/ '/-/ -- 'tf
'1'1' ?~
t(-S: 13
.~.
}/-?-J3
-6' f3
Pm.
(; 7 'i-P- JI1C.e, ~ Ave:
S/lR'.&E/PPA/l C ,';to
G 7 t'J/ /-fG7! 177J J>,t.Ic
S'/ffl- ?7F/? A/~rz#/At/O
2727 .CI/tw
5# 6cJ<-t 0
12-C u.. 9~ J1:
C<L,
f7*'i .5:hJ"- 'H"-''yP'..J
l.H(S~
7'~7-73
1- 9- 93
'.
.~.Namo
t-( -/o1Y
/'
IS,
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA .
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, Including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
~~Jlo~8.~ D;j~?3
1(_ ( 7 -9
'1/;2 <V9 J
n
PrlnI
S~n
PrlnI""
Sign Name
PrlnI....
S~""
PrlnI....
Sign NaINI
PrlnI""
SlgnNaml
PrlnI NamI
SlgnNaml
PrlnI""
Sign""
PrlnI""
Sign Name
PrlnaNan
Sign""
Prim Name
tp
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
Cit of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersign nd
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments. as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
, '-
D . t .
"4- "3'-7'3
y- '22 r'S
I{ -J~ 1
\\6 G 10,
Sc...., c.J( I( ~ ?;>, f ).
.9 $, S'7o P.tk(j2PcIi/ .J.;;-F
CAll 1a.:,s1-{
0170 J
qno)
Lf-~d -'l3
~-/)/j5
S~n
,ocp c.o
'iUou.scOu. "\.02'50
{~ m~ClJltolr~
J '0-
L'$ ,,,., AI U
P1,..-eN Vlt/le C.". ejZ~T
6 ~ '!;;: _ <-\: y \<<--~ ..I(.::\t\"1'2-7
./..\; (~.L CA. 1;)"1--iLl J-.j.~:;l..q~
'2-~~ ~ 7 5',
--
'-t -~J GS
-2.2 !j3
'f -)..)"'1
P"'-
P"'-
S~_
Jf . 22 - 'S
I~
~'... "
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
o . I .
1.{-'1-13
~ -~-~
4--5 -?3
-0-~
~ 3- 7'3
5'- s-'8
3'-3-
.:> -.$-fJ-
o~a-13
5<3-13
!",~-,
(.'r-' $-L/- 5'3'
(1..4 . "
6/'1(. f' J
~-Cf9.s
5- 5-'7.3
J.5
.
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned HomeownersfResidents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
PO..
Add,...
D . t .
~/"f-/$?S
(t1$tJ ;..( /YtfJ.../'-"" sr
'?
)g{PJs-' HIJ'fh: 1/ 51-'
eo ('
J//'f/C;
I~bt<.fr~~j,t. sr
GVt? a &1//::: ~ 'tf)
)!6A9~,d#.
a... _ 7';( ,/197
l<f"? '6' F,,,Jt,,:~,- .> r.
f)6v'~r? ,C,.q 7' y" 7
/D 3"0 j('4/0 N S r.
";''''0 1C,c '" l' ~ <,16 ..,
/030 NcJII s-f,
Dp.tlo rLF-
<107 IOlo/CNl tfJ..
'1'-/11 93
If I/- 93
'1-1-73
'1- r't -73
'(-/'1-93
'1--7../- C("3
? 07 Qe..vc ~ rz~.
'-f -?-I-t 3
-75"7 ~~,tV--(
p'?-c'~
)6'"
~/
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities. including any purported industrial developments. as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
~~~~
t.fo7
",'(If '<~'V(.AJOOO 4-v ~
CH 0,<.... c~
1~4z..J &uo.Jt>JI~
SlgnNaIM
f20.-z..7 . ~\<.;;)O~ ~
~ (LA. CJ't.<!
1~/1/S-~~
2. ()
P.........
S~n......
"""'......
\
S~n_
7c..{7 0"eE:[;,uCJ-Joo~
() Bu .e IE..- Ctl tf:Lrf 07
4 ,. C-4~
~ILC. cu4 CZ'1....-'11J7
/~77
~ ~ :?A'9'd 7
Sign"""
P"'-
Sign"'"
PO..
'y
D . t .
tj-6 -~
1./.--7-93>
~-o- 73
'1- f--'1;3
L/-1-f' ~
~ q q)
'1/9/f3
Q
'i!fD/Q3
##O/9Y
(/0 /'1 ~
If-t ~-11
7/-/d -.t:3
If
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Sign Name
PrlnI Name
SI;.
PrI,.. Name
Sign Name
Print NamI
Sign NamI
Print NamI
Sign Name
Prim Name
Sign Name
PrlnI Namo
Sign Namo
Print Nan
........ lEi "P. 'I. \.0.." V'L-
(J.. 9~Y
J~be. "-\r.l,,1\ ve...
<;6) G. 7t-YO
-'2L> \ L14 L "'-
(OJioo'\. 1.-
iI/ .
U. '1ZSbI
o . ill
7" ~
rhO 9&
l./jbl'r3,
4/"!l3
e-z
:2.., no f'\orJ.
.\-11 "'-LI'-I'J ~ t12,>l{~
?- 'i: () :tr-J.l...... "'" ~ (t{:)
c...... <; ft.-<.9 <i)
IICJ5() lJ<Ry Ve Ih0
roflfa.M- CJT q J-335
.s S'l -r. .............- r;ttA..
~.u-k CiA- 'e'2-J"lJ
G2fS(p~ ~ r + 0
s-; e - Q2QOY
1sz,8te 8c<.- r lx.e: 51
nn+z:.-rtft cA- q233~
3b 70 ~().. Dr
So.: f' ('{J. ~""\)
tp,//7
'-f-lr<1 '3
J..j-b'" 9 3
1f-/p-93
v{-t,-q 3>
'-1-'- -~s
tJ-6-q3
'-f-~-1}
tl..- (j..- q J
\ 'A-
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED,-PROTEST THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY CALMAT
WHICH IS KNOWN AS SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01 IN THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO AND WOULD ALLOW MINING AND MINING RELATED ACTIVITIES
IN THE CAJON CREEK. AS CITIZENS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WE
OBJECT BECAUSE IT WOULD NOT BE IN OUR BEST INTERESTS FORREILTH;
SAFETY AND WELFARE REASONS.
,JdJ~
~ 0
"""'~;.
-/3-
"""'......
......
ogn
P.........
BlI_
P.........
Sign......
"""'......
Sign......
P.........
Sign......
P.........
Sign......
"""'......
.......
"""'-
.......
P.........
Sign......
P.........
Sign......
P......... :3
, .
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents oftheSan Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto. .... .
Add.... 350 LV, 5'iJ'/1Ii sT.
$<UI .& ~ 4ifJit!o, t:!A
1;).
D . t .
'1- 8 -1.3
$Oft! C,tt:S c....J V
S
c34
I 0 1 cJ'!5' C h 0 '0' Qlr-C- .41.'-".
}ql q 23>l{
/ /'1
~ : (,.: l.
'1,1 /(/.iL
_ ,r-f.3
.J, /;;'-7-5
L/ -/ l. - c( :>
'/
/ ( ,',
)
PrinI"-
SlfiInNunl
PrinI"-
SlgnNanw
PrlnlNarm
Sign Name
Prim NunI
SlgnNanw
Prlnt NamI
Sign NamI
Prlnt Namt
SQn"-
Prlnt NamI
SlgnNamt
Print"-
SlgnNaml
Print Nan.
(p
1
.
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Add,.. 0 . 1 .
.2.37S W. ino.r;5olJ ST 4-8-93
..,..... ,,0....01 i" Cf:2'107
s/r9 I(pv{' r.. t9ve.
$~n Rei/!4' rc~/dt? c~ 9'Pi'f'07 Y'- T .. '13
O? 1.3,'11>
y~p -9.
L{~ ")
0" ::1-'-\~~
~\-~ ~ ~:;l~S
SlgnNamt
l'lP' '-!-. '547t~ ~7'lI>1 h. ~n
eot+o-n ,t.~ q05QJ4
373 cs.
i,'I,.! ~1t ?
7/ (p 5 FahYJ V-{- f)1.
Aw1 ~~u CA. C;,;;C(C>
\IB) l~d"".--#)jJ
~ 1')0 (+1. Cj
05?D a II.{
iCi I ru
l .J(//NZ/I'II,1"1I h'1I"
~ :&iJi,J' ~ CJ".. 9.z$os
313/ j.." Tf/ e /IF :.../".
C II I. . (p
..:u 'o(}n, , ./') ,e .71 /
'7'-7-"75
-9'-to"73
,of -73
J~
J
Petition Ag~~nst Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the eal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
,
~.
11
VI
f,(
P.........
ogn
Ptllll~
n
PrlntNarM
Sign anlI
P.........
Sign HarM
P.........
Sign......
Print Nan
SlgnNaml
PrlnI NamI
Sign Nan
PrlntNamt
SlgnNamt
PrlnI Nan
SIgn_
P~.."""
Sign......
Print Namt
Sign......
PrlntH-.
';,,~ <
o . t . \'
- g ~f3
Y-:Y- fS!
fA
'1
p.
~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
l "13
ef(.
'p(/l
(0 (j _ H~CK-EJr
"L VQ
(()IS D~taec~r ,DR.
G- VO I<?Ie-
6ZC @Rt;cNWOOt{)
?~ o/~LA-o/^I
ar cA, 9~ ~d'
/'-I . .
SGlVl!3eynQvdl;",o,(ct . 9.9 crll
SIgn_
PrlnINImo
S~nNlmo
PrlnINImo
SIgnNlmo
\ Pl'lnl Namt
I 51 1/ 7/'tv
() cf"Vv d fE"
o . t .
V-- ro -
q-IO-?)
9-/Q-9.3
::s
ct~/1-7~
'-(- 1'l-'13-
vI.l~ 3
f,!;~3
Y./3~ J
r.1 r , 3- "L '"1
Y~/T-7J
t{~/ c-f,J
/5
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents oftheSan Bemardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
Add r...
n
<Sf
..J2. (' / J t, t::- 1./1 f/-= .5 +- . .s.1 .
C R I~F /1 C1tY ?J~
~ 1 ~ V u:Jg.. -$'r- &~ 4~ f.Ll. ~ a '"2
-q' (J 7f ff 2.f - ( L:J
/ {)~-3:3 IV. F If' ~ M lJ NT '1_ / /.1_ o?
IA. e. I . c~. 9:2.3'1 / /~
/()~.33 /v.FRE M()NT
ueA-/~A- C .9.7-3'1'1 ~-/'7-7.3
630 LV 7TJ. s t-
PIlnI .....
Print NIrNl
cr-/9~ ")
UJtA. Y
ktx~ )"dl~ C ~'1 .
1J.....G:,1o (!../>.rAJ1D""
l!- ok /fLt/- \7 f
r/ ~I > -9 ')
Sign .....
PrlncNaml
Sign .....
PIlnI .....
Slgnrwr.
PIlnI .....
Sign Name
Print Nan.
Sign .....
PIlnI.....
Sign Name
Ptlm.....
Sign .....
PrlntNarm
9
, .
." ..
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned HomeownerslResicfents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported Industrial developments, as proposecl by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
P"'- ~ /
"'" ,,,,, 4"'_""'<<''-
-..../ ~ ~ g d R~~ ~~
"b <t!./t!J rcta e~ > 92~ ,..
o . t .
'-)-/6~9.3
I.{ . \l.. - Cl\ <<:1
Q.wC/vJ
-I/" '/3
C-j -/~-q j
i
Lf-/g-73
'I/I*/lJ
i/rr- r~
IIf$
.
f S 00 $'. if} J /1' /*--[ ,4' tJ
967 h_ !)vv IIT..A-
6,.
--
;;;6~;)7~
1^- -~}-
/lS7fC S-'I>'T/I#II' C!JAI
/1"<- it)
I fI ~ <-I cJ S7::>A/"T1>l ~~
6'(,:,5 K~ Z?w-
81gn_
--
('
? 7..-<j D"I (ft
81gn_
't-U-93
8Ign - /
--
8Ign -
""
",
--
\
/
/~
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, PROTEST THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY CALMAT
WHICH IS KNOWN AS SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01 IN THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO AND WOULD ALLOW MINING AND MINING RELATED ACTIVITIES
IN THE CAJON CREEK. AS CITIZENS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WE
OBJECT BECAUSE IT WOULD NOT BE IN OUR BEST INTERESTS FOR WEALTH;
SAFETY AND WELFARE REASONS.
o it I .
n
~2'G~
L//39ff1d
.v 93
~n
P'"
C\ -d--~-CJ ~
Lf-'})fi]
o "/ rv1 OcfC'~G-fb((2p r2-o .
~1I~':>19 G- C1'j '7Z-<:; Q'f-
II
~
!t~~~~ 73
./6'6--4
f- 2z -
IS
f.'
Petition AqaiJ'lst Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bern .~-
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents ofthe · and River . unties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed t al or mining-related
activities, Including any purported industrial developments, as proposed by the eal.Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
i,
~
acid,...
Iinl
'2 <>f2-S;- e>I'?..Co-(('? ..bA....1 t./~
Hr.... ICr- ch_ b
r 2-- 'f- "" <...A 7 r-4.. S T
~ /""'-D f (;,
~l.e €.X\a-.\ \ ~ l '<l-
\r\\~ V:':'o....- q ~~4lp
J 'Ll{ 2- IJ, <l U, 5. -iJ. a;v
/1.-<. '~t' I CA 7;)-1"0(;
. . 0<: 3C,.3
,e;iI.Ji.rl: ;c1~
P.o. 8,<i)< 300<./'1
~
2-C.Z5 C~/o I1ve
~... Bef"~ 11\0 9 Z <(01(
;=~ (Vo~..n. f7~,,1< 1f1 /1~oy
.5o.f.rd"4 .,:Z<f07-
--
Sign
--
Sign""
,...-
8\1.-
'Iinl_
SlgnNMII
,Iinl_
SIgn_
,Iinl_
..A.:. "
~~'
"."
~1i':;~,.
1h~
'1- 22-'13
4~d-d-~ 1. :)
lf~~-Cj 3
'I/n 93
,/''2-:>-'1::5
<F-zz-
::]
l!z~ 11J
L;/22113
~ h L I{g
/
I :J .~\i.'~~
...,.,..:.';;~.._--
r"'"......... C-
..-----
-
",,-
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED,'PROTEST THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY CALMAT
WHICH IS KNOWN AS SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01 IN THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO AND WOULD ALLOW MINING AND MINING RELATED ACTIVITIES
IN THE CAJON CREEK. AS CITIZENS"OF THE ,liTATE O"F CALIFORNIA WE
OBJECT BECAUSE IT WOULD 'NOT BE IN OUR BEST' INTEREstS FeR FlEALTH;
SAFETY AND WELFARE REASONS.
~t~Jq??
~'2;2~7~
l.f -c;rJ--Cl3
'i /7..-,./ ~
'-1- ;2.,.&f
'f-JJ.-
I.f -2.1.-'\ ~
Lj-ll. -73
~ -;;t~ -'b
4-d';) -<:0-
(/-2-2...7~
fi..l~Oj~
zP /1~
~~P-
A(-2~
,:r
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned HomeownerslResidents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, including any purported Industrial developments. as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
S9l NImo
_ NImo
lllgn NImo
PMI NImo
8lgn NImo
P... NImo
Swn"""
P'" NImo
SIgnNlmo
PMI NImo
S~nNlmo
_ NImo
S~nNlmo
POI< NImo
D . t .
Z- "37;3- J./-J.1-9a
d/ll5Z F. h'l6'I1V94D/JVr:::
/<1>/5.
'1,21
x
Petition Against Cal-Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We, the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the San Bernardino and Riverside counties and
cities therein, wish to go on record u being opposed to any and all mining or mining-related
activities, Including any purported Industrial developments, as proposed by the Cal-Mat Specific
Plan 90-01 and any amendments related thereto.
,1~ n /' Ad..... ., L ~~ o . t .
. /.J., . ---;h '('d .J~.. shh-3
:P~:- Mbo", "'oS :!i.." for".a..r'J,. A ~o. cr~07
' ~
,.r" c/1 ~< - ~ 17l"$6 P,~.-.J/(-{C 5-9-r3
""tttt, (l. 7<.12.4-'1 ~ ~ F ~ "- t -+- ._4 c/f .~ 9217.,
,
'~~"Hn~.' ^n ) J7'S'f6 7; ne.riA/e.
PIlnI .~~ +OJd"!",.d' n.l1 q 2. 1Jr ,,-~- 'fJ
. .)" . HU-.f1
'~n .....
P",".....
''8'' .....
'Qn ..... .
PIinI..... .
'~n"'"
.
P",".....
.~.....
.
Prlrt...... .
.
.~.....
PrlntNamt
.
Sign NI.rM
PIinI.....
.~..... I
PIlnI.....
Sign""
P",".....
'~n.....
PIlnI.....
'~n"'"
PIlnI.....
.~.....
PrlnlNamI .
.
3
c':rTrTO; BY:
CITIZENS ~OR PRESERVATION OF BADGER CANYON
WE. THE UNDERSIGNED. DO PROTEST THE PROPOSED HOUSING
DEVELOP~ENT IN BADGER CANYON AND DO SO BECAUSE IT WOULD
NOT BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY
O~ SAN BERNARDINO, STATE O~ CALIPORNIA, POR HEALTH, SAFETv,
AND WELFARE REASONS.
N.4>:::
ADDRESS
CTY
ZID CODE
S.,..",J 'I""~ S;L""
2':670' w. TnMijolJ ST Sct.....&..."''''...J;''o c..:fT
Q7-407
'tl7
~I
AMAlM (\~1()
{:~~ I5r~
~G ~ ~4::,g
1'IlJ1 E". <hrrn~~;D.#I07
q,,:l~ ") j,
c____ .. _1;2.303;
~v~ ffOlhX-.!3~
r
"~"
8v~h.'L,&
,
9 d-$ ;)5
9
q d-lfl)
C;,;)VOS--
Cj L~ll S
P(,titi,:>n !w,c,irc'-t ',"-r",rrt ':a,10n Creek Project
City of' Snli Del'nardi;]o, CA
We, the undersigned HomeoHnp-rs/Residentsof the Verdemont
and surrounding community, City and Count}' of San Bernardino,
State of' Cali forni", Hish to i'" on record as being opposed to
any and all mininr' JI' ~Jin;nv !'r"lated activities, including any
purpor' ':"-,'1 j nd 'l:1!,(' i ,,' ,! (, v" . () :.i':',:' ", a, proposed by the Cal-Mat
Specifi (. Plan (F:,- I ;1[:(: ;-j!,:Y :::;rf](-'ndrnents. related thereto<.
:!l;. [,',ORE.'. CI'H
/77//odJu--- _~~r;/1;'J~ 4L/~ 5/5'_
;<.4.% Aa~_n___2._~{(~_Jf.:.Jtle: s.lS,
1.. . (LL_n_~~LlbJ'. ~, ~ .
'~'i~~~R ~dlJJn
Jd . .y;:, 1
/~'7,f ,~<< 'T~ ~ ~
~6 'I r3~ ~ 50 . . ,tU>t z3'-;6
(V(r-,c.-L D ,,-J () niP I E. d ~ r- ST M51L-d C" i~3;)f
~;t_0L~~n____33L.L I ri1 31- S/f'Nl1tf4N'/ /4 '1-1c//()
." / c26bJS" . ,". B0n
ah &, b 9J tf
255'=:,) PA-G-r':/C JT. cr~4D4.
. '''-''--~~-----'--,,---"-----
'7/LL ()7To so T s~ 1!b//JC(rt'~Hr f:J!lOc;,
J"L1R-.fur0u-, s, t: (0...... 16~I..;~ ~
__~:rJC; _;/<r 11-6 -e 5' /2 'J 2 '/tJ'}l
~~ ~ ')55/~ '- ,",u1D t ~ S.ls- 9;2C;/1Ct
1r~JJ~:';"iWOi;1;L~ lI~~b.,d qJ.3~
7 t;:6 ~ 0 92
/, tI-6..f._~~__ >'7: . (' 1.3 ~~ q z. L,t t'~
.. Q2;),~.ttY~~ ~ 9~~
. /_&"SQ Wc,Te, 5' !Jr CfP. 97--3'J...'i
V1.' \ 12DH S'!/!L ~~~/~ 9'~31.r
~~->?~.2<;-r&C.2,d-y~'L s-r <)A'--'1 ~. '7,?Sh("/,
-----r-m /
ZIP CODE
9..2 '7'~ '7
0/2 .ct 0 C(
, b Lj.
::1.3
tyCk/ 1~
Petition Against'the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corporation's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
DATE
~- /.J - q?J
j- IS ~ q '0
~-17'C3
3-I6--Cf3
3-()-0/3
3-/6-73
3-~-CJ.s
3 - 1- '13
.:5 2-1 13 RJoJlU:.tJ Ral:)lq&~-<.-
~-l. \~ ~ ch,.vv..
3. 011-
3-ll-~
fY)(l.Ju..o.... ~
~~f7
cv. ~f;- ~. ~ 12'f<l-r-
to. ~~ fist ~ q.z '/0..['
,
\1-)., R..oSA, r.LttA- Sj, ~B. q ufo S
S t s& 4?5fotJ
st.. <i2<.{(J~
c2 l..J ~{l.~ S4J. 5": i:JVti5
d &,OS- tz.o~~Gu
-sr 6~f\nO.^ft.;"'n.. Cc. 9;).vos-
;}. 77 S- J<.os~ /Vrl4 'i.r' /? #1
'i:. W - /3.ItJ- '- I'T '72-VcJ.r.
~.,;;..... .. .' ~R.,.J~,,;;.~~-r.Il'G4+-. ~~7
,..1(,04- vJ R.Jy.v,+", (,1"
'S..I' ~A'y,^l.\,.\ ..."'" (/-I '1~<.tv\
'i).'b!\o l<0=l-I':k. "l~
;;2( 'I ];
!Jl4 !J
ZS31
~.t.
. 0
d--
"
'<l I
.
,
.~~
,..L
~rt::.t1
yl. -
Iflkl
Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
I
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corporation's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
3-2/-(n t)
3-~/-~3 ~~~~
1)- (0 - 73 (~ h/.
:) - (Q- '7."3 S"r-1'Jf.J I< t.I L <:/A. bVl ~ j.A:u...'/1 c41}.,-/or
5 - h - q.3 JOWr) ~ cna.-tl kLlL ~7 CIS R.Q),^'C'1\-~ A-rJe
~ ~r;~ li;r!::7JJ. ~:e;;;'^:;.?"..c~:.~~:.s
~. , ~ r ~ It, F I~f tA...{ .2 ) Ij 1J C'-.~( t.1"\U
S ..
I "~... '~" - Q
-. ~\ L ~t I ,;t"t': (L.ot 2,'65lo((&.JCiJ.l.to.- AT.
"-
-- ~ - 0 d A-(2i\..... LA.
S- ~'~
$' · ... . MtIi"
.t"t
2.7'J'I
u/. A?o:'''.''',T/'t sr
SAN
,sEte"J_t>,,,,,,
ejIJ-
"fZ-YoS
l. 7 rr w n. nc",^;~.
&-0
1ft.M
Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corporation's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
DATE
..s-'J-7' '3
~~q
ADDRESS
;)7 :flj /(OSCl;'",.f-..
s-l- 5:., gy'1,
t
Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corpora~ion's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
I~
\
,..........,., ..,. '-,,. i '" ~ ,...
Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corpora~ion's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
- =-
DATE NAME A~ l /
/ 8 -ftftj.f4j/1;?/lqI6~~.~ ?2/#1.~ )~~
II. - ,.~ ;/
2'
//
3
If 1/
~ : J";ff{!-It;~~ ~;B ~:;;,:(;;;:~t7;:
71' ~)'-w7tZf/)bL(lt1 12 ~.-syiA)UAJ 'n1n~~M4'M\47~)/be
CII~~~~~1~q~~ -
5_10 tv1.lu( AtL jJ, '# p~
" / /,'
t:!
.c;Ll7.
C;. ~ & ~
4.So.r- A). ~ 10 Of: 1:2~S. ~~~~
ttSoS)J. 'Ds.::~' ci :;;~~ J
45-044) &z<_/~I s;- ~ _~~
LfL\--7J.- . V1~oV\. Lj-D e...&se- ^vl\lz..
'-\ \ N ~JJf'l~0 92l.{o5
~ f'11\~ c;LU~N BOB ~') . .JIANE PL.
&J,(('~ ~-'II'~~W ~_
.3;,(/-'" ~.'. '/ Nt _ _ Z~ $~~?/
;;j
I':::;;;;;~::::
~
/_ K __ _.~. ~ d "/~J/'I~"-
Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corporation's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
-,
" '.."
'-
"--
. WE TNt {AfII/)IE/(SlfNE.D RE:.(f/).Ii~T TIIAT"
-rile St:tJ f3&uv'4"/(lJ1NO ~/T'1 CPt(NCI L /VI" //E
'THtEJp. IVlEET/III) 'I~ 'Tl-lt EVtf/lllNr ft/
!;)/rc{,f.{ J 'tl-/tf CA ~Il?if prfj'1tEc1' J .s I) -rNlIT w€
dAN (!OIl1ME:.N-y I
NIJlVf G,
. . tJ(jlliJleNfjf.~ON
jt;;;FFW( 1:>Av1$
. "-.-
~~D~~~
~" \ 10'19
..:t\:~~~
~ c.o-k
5ALqJf)L,4- 0wflfoJ
f~'~~iJ
~ 7?:PJ:>
~&_/~
~~"~
'?j~
JpAJ<<IJ f ~
f1~)R. ess S J; Ii Jm.(.,
t./f"11 tV. fbrINJ~~ d~
~ /JInv1htL IIV/.) jt/1 t()1..(lV - ~
L-/lIq!r'" }?tJN 'PJlda() ,7: . . ~~
, ,AIJ i!__N4Rb1~O ,eA. qL"~r
~71l~.~~
~&1l'O ('AAz
'-{Sl~ Sp..'-.:l l:gJ .'"\-o ,~
$~~~~~ CA q~%S' /"VI". '..) '/i J.,
4~o~ I'l, fu.sh..~. ~~
'5. B. C1{' 1d-.<{tJ-Ji )j I tJ-t-.
L/715 /'(. ~~ ~ \~~~
Se...v.. ~~)~ 1.;1.10
t(~to~ tV, ~AIJNS--orJ . ;0 f) 11
.5 6 cj;JJlo s . v.-..
~ J 77 /!/ Crf/:>ft1 . . ~
~CPr J1f1L'IJ{}1o #1!fo
v2WCf ,(.b- t)&.() tA/3uJ e:r ~
~6~i.J()
i'5,,~ At ~diX4 4~~Z~-7
~~~ @
.l..)'Ir ~~~~ "r~ ~
~<A. ~~
;tiff
"I~ /oJ ~ ~t4)d~~)
/
Jl,I'ihwe , ~~, _
\,t":Qn t w--tado Lf3iA krol') b, Cf10 Sf.;
m~~ / 1~)\ \{~rt
l \b't-.(t L r It\ v LC 'Jlf()'J- J<oS0..nk ~ "
\ e.+e.- \~e.~ :2?3yl?os.v;/q 'Sf,
~~~ J....)~4 /'-.r1)Clrifc... ;;'f,
:!!f~ S.~ck, 'fcZ.f'f- Ai,~..('d c:r
--.1">(' :1./I...--/~ '/,;2.9"') ;f/,~)'q~/
," "G~a/l ()J, G:rfscr",,'13aS IV, R.c.(J!Jeic.f-'
.13,...,-MATTl>O~ '. <;sos \0. S.M:)B8JnO.>'-:- I,
IYh'1!~ MM1S L; S 76 -,jc1fu)ea ~. ~
/K~ PAM.O> ~S9'1 ACA-f>1AMo <5+' ~ '
~~ht.I~.(U.d'~ " , ," ,,:UOiS-': ;).?.;i IJ~... mUs~(Jj' _ -I~4/~
._t5.\AAfri1A'''-,) \\~r1\Cl.nk~J....I..1o (I). r<-t\..'l-.t.LeA (J.",J -:::J7 -}JQJ>~
tJ/fAr.;;/gt2rflJl/V " zz.z. tf (jVN~ f/C '/~ '
(b~;i' lIf/a~ 272/-1 JON S P L " - -
" eJWaf..? Ar..~~I!/,' 'fSolf fX>'J /)/<;:6-0 ~'t;e~C7 ~
,'fUJ:. ~,L-j<S"6</ f/)~D/~~ 51 J~
@
1f~1
'f'''
l
"
j
j
j
1
.1
,
I
I
!
i
,
,
'~~
Pet it fori -A grrri!it 111 e C a I Mat C a j on C r e e i< Pro j e c t
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corporation's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
ADDRESS
L(2-&
f~ba_
I
~
~ll) Mev ~. ~
, .,-g- , '3 r /?RA/c.: .
)- -o-q
~2)~
~ ,(b.
vs-
i( ") 0 LLYv f-.1J'f; vel- s+ >/.. ~Ov c:.tJ,
&qL(~ I (If. :56.
<l17? P. 14fPp/ el i: $Jvt2 , .
tf?s'1 /./--&rRtl.,-fcCY ~~
4.1f.(9~_$}Jb"lIv,}i) S41J6'i/ltJb
'-I~ oS' - I. 'V- , ro .:54... il <;Il '1-
.-
,f
.s Jf) -73
Sl:>"Z
.5/I()/~-3 It t
. </
~<i4 h .
A ~._~r ~'--'L
Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corporation's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
NAME
ADDRESS
L/'1QS- ~1>lt:i,O ~
;.
f"
r \
~~<f
~
~
2~1ti~-wr' '" ~~A ~ ~ V ~ ~?
~I
#/fJ'
Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, -County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any urported
industrial dE!ve.1opment, as proposed by the C 1 t Corporation's
Specific P.Hn 90-01 and any ammendments rel. ted hereto.
. /
-\
4tAS N. 'tal \3Jlr1V CA Q24(:1.;
L~~: ^ ~~ lI;ss '\ ~",,->~.1.\- l.b. ,~~(\S
, ,.-
D!::>
. Q;;.WJ5
.,
11 Cfl(.tS
D~ r
5'--1,0
'3-'1-'13
':;-10-43
l.i
~o ~'ItJS-
-c .s.,~ 9z,-!0)
;2f~
sl3
<:.,""'\.;~iS..... tf..vc.<;A Y'l..e.-..,'V\.! '-\50'5 1':1, ~ "I;;V(DS
~ A.A~, J4l,lZ.~ ~\.) ~no S.B c:n4c5 d- 0
!tiff
.
Petition Against the Cal Mat Cajon Creek Project
City of San Bernardino, CA
We the undersigned Homeowners/Residents of the Cimarron
Ranch Housing Development, located in the City of San
Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
wish to go on record as being opposed to any and all mining
or mining related activities, including any purported
industrial development, as proposed by the Cal Mat Corporation's
Specific Plan 90-01 and any ammendments related thereto.
DATE
B/-;o)1,3
NAME
(!k5JJdJ 'bt:wi.
ADDRESS
~ lYJnl};~SI1J
~~
(j)
i4!
REPORT ON
JOB GENERATION
FOR .
CAJON CREEK PROJECT
SPECIFIC PLAN 90-01
SJb/~
#~F
C CalMat
CAJON CREEK
***
c
11,000 JOBS!
FOR THE NEXT
25 YEARS!
c
-
-
-
'"
" '"
I.t') '"
z ..
ii1 III
~ .. => ...
en - .... ""
'" 0 ii1 0
~ m ... ~ w ~
W N
_0 .... .... ..
=> ~ N
..., in z " 0
~ IL ~ Z
IL Z Z ....
~ 0 .. 0 5E 0
;:: ....
... 0 0
~ => N
0:: 0::
.... ....
III III
=> Z
C 0
~ 0
0
on
0 on
N
" ..
..
Z III
ii1 ...
~ ~ 0
C .. 0:: ....
.r/) 0 W N 0
- <( i ..
m N IL N
w => " 0
0 .... Z Z Z ....
..., in ~ 0 z. g
Cf) IL ~
IL ;::
0 .. 0 0
o:l ... => N
"" 0::
ii1 ....
0 .... III
III Z
=> 0
C 0
~ ~
~
0
en
~
<r: on
N on
on ..
~ " ..
I z III
ii1 ...
~
~ .. ~ 0:: 0
N 0 W 0
en 0 <( .... N 0
i - ~
m IL .. N
w =>
LO 0 .... z z " 0
in ~ 0 z ....
N ..., IL ;:: Z It)
I IL 5E
0 .. 0 0'\
... => 0'\
l ~ 0:: ....
'~ 0:: ....
Q .... III
III Z
::l 0
C 0
~
o
.
Are these numbers realistic? Yes.
The formula Agajanian & Associates used to project these numbers
is based on standardized techniques used to estimate how future economies
are going to perform.
It is based on the type of development, the development square
footage and the economic history of the area.
Twenty cities, the State of California, the County of San Diego and
nine redevelopment agencies have relied on Agajanian and Associates for
economic research and projections.
Cities:
o
Chino
Dana Point
Lancaster
Manteca
Palm Desert
Rancho Cucamonga
San Diego
Vernon
Imperial Beach
Highland
Chula Vista
Grand Terrace
La Quinta
Norco
Port Hueneme
Rancho Mirage
Culver City
Victorvill
Paso Robles
Laguna Hills
Redevelopment Agencies:
Buena Park
Lorna Linda
Los Angeles
Walnut
Santa Paula
Lancaster
Long Beach
Monterey Park
Westminster
o
o
As the project develops and is marketed, the jobs come. They have
at our other sites. We thoroughly study and plan our sites. We do
everything we Can to take the guesswork out of our projections.
WHY?
We must know if our project is viable before we
initiate the permitting process. The number of years
and costs to acquire permits makes guesswork
prohibitive.
The project will develop because the Cajon Creek site is a prime site
for future economic growth.
WHY?
I. As aggregate reserves are depleted in the
surrounding area, the aggregate resources at this site
will be important to keeping future local building
costs down.
o
2. The site is also now recognized as a prime
rail/highway hub, and will play an important role in
San Bernardino's ability to attract rail-related
industry to the City. Norton does not have the rail
access that our Cajon Creek site does.
CalMat Co. currently operates in 28 cities in the Western U .S.. We
have relied on similar economic projections and studies to develop our
business plans in each city.
CalM at CAJON CREEK
o
279.5 acres industrial property
5,189,300 sq. ft. building space
367.5 acres available to develop as industrial property after
mining & reclamation
745 acres remaining in habitat conservation/open space
o
.
Do we mine, reclaim and develop our
properties as promised? YES.
. Do our master-planned projects generate
new jobs as projected? YES.
CalMat has other master-planned projects that were approved in the early
80's. Each project includes mining operations, reclamation and property
development. THESE PROJECTS CLEARLY SHOW THAT WE KNOW
HOW TO DEVELOP PROPERTY AND THUS CREATE JOBS.
Rio Vista East. CalMat Mission Valley. San Diego
50 acres still in development
1,775 Jobs
o Carroll Canyon Center. San Diego
35 acres still in development
645 Jobs
7th Street Business Park. Phoenix. Arizona
54 acres still in development
601 Jobs
CalMat Business Center. Irwindale
50.3 acres still in development
712 Jobs
THESE PROJECTS SHOW THAT JOB GENERATION IS ON GOING
WITH OUR MASTER-PLANNED PROJECTS.
o
-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO REC'EIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
8-
\jtJ\~~
~)
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project ill provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name:
Company: ,
Address:" /01/ II! J;lt1f i s~ Cf/t.
Phon~'J' B 8cP- t;'fJ53
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: u.// './ ~~:)) ~
Please Print Name:~ t' .t.. t. I a {J (? fl R TL.c 1<....
Company:
Address: 1<5' ~/ ~ .M (=: .In C It!.. -e. T; ../J f? t
.s,/i?
Phone: 9.#5?) g:? {S/? / ..? S-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will ProvidiJ
signature:L~io( 10 .~~__
Please Print Name: E .g I ~..'\
Company:
Address: I 8 10 q
~~
1J ~\ b",
g e/.b
~
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 6 '993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:3 <~ +\ ~)-&~---
Please Print Name: l....~ e...../ 1-/ v./ ~ ~ -l ~e(.sI"c)b'::J
Company:
Address:
.s <.{ r N. b ~ 11~1 s\v...
Phone: ~-;:...... is u1 C"'\..
88'\ 3 c; ~ .3
, . ;
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVF:~
MAr 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
s~~~
Please Print Name: 0 -; r ;;;;0 1/ ",. !J fi A)
Company: P--
..,='/6/9<-<./ ~Ih,^-
_~-^&--"---t ' e,~
Phone:J PS )>0 ruS-
\
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECE/VED
HAV 0 6 1993
YES, I sUPfilrt the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will p. vide.
Signature:
IJ-Ile~
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address: /~~ /-1 h / tpla/~~
Phone: k~ q ') & ;)- :;-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 6 '993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:J..hOftp,.G l.l)l )Ao/YY7J"
Please Print Name: 0&.olp,tiP l,)/ )/1 ~ I'Y7 5
.
(
Company: (JAl.m/!.J: t!tJ. /,/)ff)l1JlHflJy d/HPI1<Jf;
Address: F/74 Modzf){J 1'; si '
c5d.1..J ~JhPd/~;~ I /!/fY),j!
I
Phone( 90 9) >If! ff - /~/-€ IJ Ip
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I sUPP"rt the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~Oject will provide.
Signature: IW/cdk ~~,.;LL
Please Print Name: ;::;'";t~ Ie f) ,<; fA #4/.1 r;/ L
Company:
Address: 1/f;2 ~
Phone:
RECEIVEn
MAY 0 6 1993
~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
Address: 7t/37 ;;'/rnJI AP;:-cr
~. /3 ~'9'7~
- --,~ ( '-..- ~ ~ _ __ 0
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
". this project will provide.
S;~_ Cn, ~Q,;net: :t;~7!::;, ~
Please Print Name: C~ I - /It'f'/ 0 tV
Company: c~f n () ~.5 '
Addr,';s: 3 / ? 6 c: /.e J7J V / ~ (c..J 11 u"f
S"-A./_ ./3y;~, C.jJ- .9ZYtS
'l?72C;t9
I
t!
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 '993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name: ~71jpP: ThtJrYJ/J_ ')
Company: /l/'..L1J1fi I /'/J &m/1?uLldy NlIf?/'Y}(V~
Address: /^!7o<J n7/JALStr.l1 8L .
~Jf } <py:.//wd.f 11/ /1'//.21/
Phone( 9CJ P) ?J'8-'i - r{)t3 7
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 '993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O"{)1.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provo e.
.---:-
Signatub----1 /---'-
Please Print Name:
c
/(1 Wi WI Y !cUt18 V' ; (
, v
Company:
Address: "302 to (; ~ i//f'U/ j f-
--~v(JQ YYiJ V j,~lC/ (/;L /('
Phone: IrF ) - '5 7 7 Go
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project wil~iide.. ~
Signature: & t f3. UJtIV'JUo 0 K
PleasePrintName:Ot:s 13 !1Af<(<,/'S 01<
Company: C -fA. t .C .
Address::'),,4Lf~ SAn I c:. R~ frys
Sfln Ee-le.nC1i'ZJ('(]~{ Pi-{J / 96).~O.5
Phone(tJO cD 7l~ y" () {h:6
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEfVF.O
HAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name:Jl111J2 Q A- <2~r c L {J /f!c
Company:
Address: ! {; ~S In If {;I Nt j: It If I ~
Sj; III b~i!N IfR DI)tO,(!/J !-/F
Phone: ? f --- 50 1I1L:L /
(
(
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RtcE'VF.D
HAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues anrt the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: d--U'i? /~1 ,,~d'b
L .
Please Print Name: Ilc./J)/? E y r:: /-1/ EL LlS'
!
Company:
AdddS: / C) / () Tr /P If ,4-(' E 'A3J r/:;6/
,
~\AJ7v-~//4,C>/)r,/1',) ,(/9 'l~J v/O
i
/? // ;? P2 - /' -- /'1 <>
Phone: '/ C> 7 ~5 0 -' ,~/ /
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Sp,' ?ic Plan 90-01.
.-
"
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and tht: ~siness that
this project will provide. . '
~ 72
. . ~ . <
S._', ~.~. ~/;Jl~ .
Please pi Name: H N R. \( ) ~/2.a/l1<.
Company:
AdJ...."s: R S-'7 '1 All 19/11t;o R v.r
-FJV'IATA/'>2. f~ QZ33;>
. r
Phone:
;1 i\
R!CE'VEO
HAY 0 6 1993
'.
~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~~~ ~~~
Please Print Name: 0 jn /J1 /"C 1-41: T/t-uAy
/\
Company: ~ f'J1J5 ~~
v ''t .'.....0 ~
Addn."c /s's-:/J /)A)a~f/j r' . / J'A/ \
\9.;> Y.... '
I~'V
".
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
COm;;~jlY:
Address: /417 ~~ :;;t-
,Cj" /;, ~r 1'~41IJ
,
Phone: CZ' ~ R -? c1 9 Y
)
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: f! tId.t IS) ~
Please Print Name: Et-If E l E> A:-4 rZ
Company:
Address: / ~ tJ 6,'}?1.~h ~'P
fl-CA./r\/ r3~
Phone: . ~ e cy 1- t. ~F
RECEIVED
MAV 0 B 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: 0 0.... \ (\ ()... ~.t Q D
Please Print Name: Lru )>fo' ~.-\u neL
Company:
Address:~ Y 1St 1=1 9 E I N 'S"\
5"'*'1 ~~ I\f 0 CA ~ ?J-{ J 0
Phone: 10)0 f~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 6 1993
YES, I suppo,>, the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
~J:J~~ --'
Signature:
Please Print Name: 1/)t.iJt"! ;-h/)ff7~ 5
Company:
AUdress: /4 72/ m~ ~J s-1- J
f'
~Ui j fStatFJ ;0f}->p.I 17 / (!e1c I
/
Phone/9L)CJ) ;<:'sfR -,'<,IJJIfl~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bem&r-dino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
.." pniJ'(J.will ~
Signature:Y1! ~J7-f lj~
~
Please Print Narne:A1,t.4R L L /;:/// I c:;
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:X~,@? &'kd. $d..Au.
Please Print Name:", , W'A1L.c1/V' .l!? tIJ/JlL,L:'6~
Company:
,~1dress:v ,/f/P' @. &/,,6 4(/ .#/.
).,.,.f - {'f. YeP (/??r
,
rl~.s'ft'S" ~; "'- ? "'9 '7
Phone: f. _z..::. 0 J ,/
,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs ~jobs, the revenues and the business that
thik-project will provide.
Signature: .f" ';? P ~.E 2/ AI--,).s- .~
Please Print Name: ~ U ~
Comp.iIIY:
Address: t?~<1:S ~
Phone:
~tJ~
,'7/\ ;e. ~/
.
t~ if- ~,& /)0
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
""'~ . :~
YES, I SU~i ... the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
. ;;Z;1~~
Slgnatu0 ~ t.. '~ __
Please Print Name:~ I i- 0 A/ C ~t/f6re.$ oN
1
Company:
Addre:,':;: I (; G S tyI~ YifCi {i Q'
~ e~6rd,HCI
S l~fl
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino neects the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will proVid~. /
Signature: ~
Please Print Name: 1/
Company:
Address:
~ 7~ A ,~ ~
Phone: 8?S7cRt:/2./
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO REceIVED
HAY 0 6 1993
YES, I sUpJY'rt the CalMat Csjon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
~",;-m..J".H: Aht/eLJ'/rJ
CO"ipany:
Address:
It b J I..d
~~
4ctp PC))<z- 4w
j).J Y //
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino need the jobs, the revenues and the business that
is project will provid
Signatu :
Comfl:my:
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
2' I I
Signature: L h!. )~A;l>j 1;;. '"1 tv if p
, ,
Please Print Name:f{ u J.1b e::/t 70 P /)1. 1(.: j/ :I/J(
Company:
Address: "'J.(J.. J7f &&&~~
'-
b <'" /7. ~ - 0/.;2, 1-//0
Phone: .:1') y, '1? I 'S" ;' {.: I (
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature~~~NtVLo 9f/!7Y;;;~
Please Print Name:]V/~,llllr~ t17. rjd('/IIJA ,
Company:
.....
AdAt&;::' ";:tf;;, ~::; ~~;/
Phone:~C{1 rfC/J-I..J'7A(
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
,
San Bernardirlo needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature~;y~ d~--f~)/t
Please Print Name: Gicll d Cia I- :l q 19 r-rc
Company:
Addr=<-::2.i7~~ ~ 4/ ;0;Sej/h c)
6.Q t1( 8/1/1~, ((// tf 2Cf //
Phone( <7c<f) ~ t 1- Ju (7
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Spedfic Plan 90-01.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and therbusiness that
this project will provide.
Signature: 0~iA.-&t- g t"'7~
Please Print N~me: E ,t-1 'V /V e,:j T L::{)A /\ ,A/ /II
Company: .
Addtess: ~;2 7 &: J?fs O/t*:/! /- ~EIlIE)f IJ-f'.
SIf/f/ 6""bJ~( ~~ 9:2 2ft/I
Phone: q tJ r - 306"-3 f' $ g>
'~--,.-,-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
(>. MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the Ca1M:tVCajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~~ ,;y;~-;;,77-4 J -~"7-r1---
Please Print Name: c-[ c-/ / 11' 11 L tJ..S"' d:;
Company:
I
Address: y- ~ () JJ IYJ A j1 {/ 111 ,j} r
S/}11 j) E./' l1/'tr vi 1}1 P "I? r; / ()
Phone: 3~ / - >:3 77
- --------.
""',..~--~,-.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
,
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I sUPtYb the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~~.p n, 8J~
Plea: Print Name:{j a rz i e eo, B R)( e~
Co~any: .')9// IV. Glt.Y" De n ~ kt;
"i,'
<
Addflts,: Sfi)1 r? e YOn;::j i" (J /N"{ ~, 9.;2IIOS-
Phone: 909'- 8'1?S-"-7 7 I ;:2
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 5 1993
,.4
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
S;""""'" -:'1" / ,. J /.1., ';j,Mc4,
Please Print N e: J '-<...J....; 0 . J. G '1 ~ It 'Y" eI 0
Company:
Address: 5?;- r 71. rtJ /1-7 1/ ,.11/ 12 7' .
~1J71 &r-YJ/17"d",t/cJ I C /J
Phone: /' cJ 9' 8'7- S- ~ 7"; ~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
.-.1
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
- this project will provide.
Signature:.L~ ~~~
Please Print Name:Cp-~~ 71f ~~:Y'V'N#'
Company:
Address: 5 ~? /V ~ lid </
-
q..J-N,. gr#dY"//I/O
Phone: '1 () ~. ?'?' 7-3 "l ?'3
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 5 1993
'.-".,2
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
S~'~re tL~?~
Please Print Name: D L '8 'l3IPS
Company:
Address: 5' .2 5 ;/ /V1 E"t? / D If! ;1/
_5/1ft (Jp;1/0 rn92'7JO
Phone: 1 g II 3.)~ ~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I suprJ;rt the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signatu~: --m~ ~ &Mey- /I~
Pleas,~ Pnnt Name: ')1? q, J aY ~__:f f- en " ~.d.17 Ila...' is
Company:
Address: ;;c. ~yt U~<r iH ~~r
<' an ,&,~....~ /~-I /'0' 7' .? (// CJ
Phone: &'i f -- ~ 7 t,f
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
<",...
~....
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: &EL'Iri Il-~Z//Y~.ss
Please Print Name: klta f.fl1~~
Company:
Address: ~b ~,QI..e .sf
. 7'1,f'O -8 ar.
...J}tJ/11 .& AM ({. -' ~ d1?) I e t14i
Phone: !cf( ~ d.3$tJ
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
t,;.~l'
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardin
s the jobs, the rev ues and the business that
this project will rovide.
Please Print Name: (' A 7'" ft?~ Yl
G"'ltT""''Y ~o
Company:
Address: ~ ~ d' n. f1 If r J/ i 1/ 7) 7" .
5~ 'YJ 6e.. <yI. -n It?'" ~ ,- ~ d ,I C ,4-
Phone: ~o 7' if ~-S-? 77 Y
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RE:CE'~fD
HAros_
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Sptdnc Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: J~d K.- .p,d~ ~
Please Print Name:H;<;21/1f All /J If'. Ill'! J(ER
Company:
Address: 2,l},3S At r;.N,Q h ~ /IIf:o, ,>1;
.J/fN BE' -fN A Ii' all\/&>_, (&", 9';2'1"os-
Phone: 901"- 2'85-771;;Z
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Sr'-_:fic Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: t:::J: /'?"~~ ~d~ , ~
./
Please Print Name:r/ #' ;V 5 /?// /( E AJ 0?:
Company:
Address:s-97' /JJ. ?JJ,I1 r ;///V J.)~
PAN EEtf?/IIM? P/IV~/ ~~ 9':;J.L,I/O
Phone: tJ01"- ~tf 0- - 77/;<'
.
-'...'~....."",' -.-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\ion Creek Project Gi't:'..:ific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
_~fu~ P"'i<ct wUl_.
Signature: t-'}t1 e~ '7 j{ tlYv1 #-.s.
Please Print Name:~ -'0 ~oN Ic:o- I h 0 fV\ ~
Company:
Address:-14Z-2-. . Z', q&f N l(;~_
~M~. Crr-q;;YfD
Phone: \9 0 cr~ r- 9p\S -28 L'I
RfCEIVLO
MAY 0 5 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Benaudino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~p &. ~
Please Print Name: IA /1/ V A cf(, zt?;4 f( /3"1(
Company:
Add~ ;;<S,-qS- /V, r;.JH?/JENJ1 ~f,
.
""'.JJ/I/1f Bj{'I?/If A RlJ/ltf4, r?# Z/;;<(fO)
Phone: 90t?-- :?g 5 ~ 77 l;;z
JOBS FOR SA1~ BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 5 1993
.
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ::f!;12 .~c y7'
/ /
Please Print Name: ,Iyf;# co" / /1 ;/ e ..3Jl .
Company:
Add~: /7':5,;? vJ A 5~
S'i C/ p~
Phone: (;t1 ,7 Y-ff'- /6'7
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide. .
Signature: bAre ~ ~
Please Print Name:j)AtZN~lL ~X~O tV
Company:
5 -1"1
Address: ~~ 3 W-,-- {,'I
StnJ t36te,v AAD/NO
Phone: $>6~ -f.,I.jI~
5r
tr14
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~~ ~
Please Print Name:_l</)e,.y rl (;l()-J~'!.
Company:
Address: j)q:r N. /'f'Iffi~; AN
5.~. J ~~LiF. 'l:l</ (6
Phone: ~ 't ~ - L( 0 J.. 0
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will pZ--
Signature: ~ - L!- rJt
Please Print Name: N, rP/ u/ H, 'rE
Company:
Address: 7 ty ?l 0 Sr E R f. / /Y 1'- J!/ YJ:;
.5/1 /( 15 /l /Ys-J~.#. 9;J 2/ / c:;
Phone: 9c?9' ~ ~~ ~-lj~,~3
.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 199~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:.fr,..,p: . /c. .iJ~ """<'
Please Print Name}? elf Oil d' Po. L~ ~
Company:
Address: S'J () "'/r] Cl/::V/t1 [) I?
(}.oA f?c~r<~....Ji~l C4.,'/P q2-'-1/0
Phone: '?"P I - <)~ 71
(,
~;H
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:_~~ vJl.~
Please Print Name: ~~.\\ \lJ \ \ \ \ ~ ~
Company;
\
Addre~s: \ ~9-, a (<\ ~ ~.
c:;-.'
// (
Phone: ~ ~ \- S":?:J LJ
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: .Nt (' /.:: r;J-fA~~
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address: cat. 6?5 /Ja..d A /J W;9 >1
(5, NA 4" cnlf /0
.~ - ( , /
Phona: /;C~ I b / /
JOBS FOR S~~ BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-61.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
!. this project will provide.
Signature: .f)~ dgk
Please Print Name:! ~ fj (l y ~ J4 J( f if
Company: -tt
Address: j~p /AI/ J /t /1 '
-517;,f_.IlP',4lyU ~ 0/>1"'<;_ 0//r ~02i/)
Phone:. fj()tf /' ;O~/J /lj~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the-. business that
this project will provide.
Company:
Addre,~~l ?~ j1) ~ ~
~/ (A-/
[;2 5" - /;;. 74'
Phone:
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide. IJ--L
Signature: r})~ ;/ ~
Please Print Name: f) E L R E R7 L. J lJIII; TE
,
Company:
Address: /.3 7 ~ MI. OJ L. ; V F
.
,,5' If 4' j? /J /I bl,. ~h'. '1:2 'f ) /
Phone: f{Jtfj'/' ~???;>-;;2.::j '3 ()
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~CJ.j\ \. r ~ k Ii ~
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address:~_Dj~n ~ , L\ 'is L J
s ,6, Chl',1Qe'n;o <1Z L/05
Phone:5j~q - r<g.5 - 'i-ft /2.-
ff!C!IV!D
HAY 0 5 1993
,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 5 1993
YES, I sUPfl'*'tthe CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~/ y)1J~
Pleasl' Print Name: ,JI/ l,)(,( >>r !J:. ;? / ,t;' liP & ;11
Company:
Address:
/A~ a/lId
aJt~
1JI/!6
Phone: Rf) [)~} I jg
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
rftCtlVED
HAY 0 5 1993
- .
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address:~\^~~ Iv ~
~J tnvAe.dINb (I j\ CJ2tfq
Phone: rtf/~l)st
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat 'Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bensardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: C\:) bo. "A \ tJ ~
v
Please Print Name: D c: V'"., t^~ ~{l; <;
Company:
Address: 1/ ~ (J fl
Si.....~ lSe-rll1 t^-.9-
Phone:~ 1-1- OZ 1/ fO
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
Company: -
AddreSS~ . (). ~ \L \ ~~ .
,S ,Cf). Cn, ~I a~
Phone:!j af1 - ~5 ~ ~~ 'L
RECEIVED
MAY 0 5 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
".
RECEIVED
. .. MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat C~n Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
(>:.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:'---YV\ P...-wuJ, ~)-~
Please Print Name: tv( 1M! / .G D It- U! S
)
Company:
,
.)
Address:/ S 7 rf
uJ I tfl/; A
Phone: frf? 7 / Y~7
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE IYEO
MAY 0 5 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: tfuAA/7~;'..t . ~..#1 /l "
/' -
Please Print Name;Eq ~ 41 / c~
Z UIl-IUS
Company:
Address:O?h70 'OJ. do ~ #
~ 7dy/O
Phone: )( ~(fr - / d. 7 It;
"
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project wil! provide.
Signature: /~ ~
Please Print Name: L, L ~ E Go R.-D 0 ,.,J
;J Ifn-Jl_J
11v
Company: ~ 13-<-<- 7tr
Address: ~tMJ7) ffro.tJ~v' II-
0~"-- rd- a:~
AJ(Ir
1'1.- ?- ':4
Phone:
RE~EIVED
APR t. 8 '993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECf:JVED
APR t 8 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: 9~ ~
/"
------
-
Please Print Name: jJ/J-r1!.tc.rr SAbA(er
Address:
f.f:5.
7 (,(p f elhJ Gr6 r
f.I.v:,~l~ qr3{r
,
IV 1.4-
Company:
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
REcrlVED
APR i 11 <993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
Signature:
Company: c!: - 2 / cI~?J~0 U
Address: 27 /~ ~~gV~/?/
(f? kI c; 2 c;/uV
, ,
Phone: 7()) ft0J9)()
-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
REt'I!'IVED
APR t. 11 ~993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~ "It- . . ^-e.J
II /
Please Print rMne: .:11kmv U Gn-2Jte...
Company: C-Ci1.J1'\M'{i.;;Jf 'd1JrwCA-StF
Address: ~ tJl-- ~ ~ "or,> LN
!h Cq tJ L- /h.J'D C( Y 3<f 10
Phone:
Pig
/
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~~>?'" 07 ~-,--
Please Print Name: BI'? / r; r; r ~ r / ~ #F RdA
Company:
Address: !2 / po J/E,/.? /-ItJl(/7 57
tYdL7l'J~ (74 '7.2:3 :24-
Phone:
O. tf058'2
" '..,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat CiYon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~4.rf)J)ni LA)' ~
Please Pri:I: <1al1i 1)1". l.JI' (56(7-
Company: .S 0 C I cd- e.S
Address: O,fermofl !/-l/eJ
&n Andll, Ul 9JifOV
)
Phone: cqoq) 8B3 - tql/
RECEIVED
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO MAY 0 7 1993
-.
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: .~~ .
Please Print Name: 1I,q-;e~ ~Nd
.Company: Q ~ Zf S~~
Address: 2- ~'O e f:I,6fft~cJ1 "'t-Ve
Phone:
~ ~~eA
9qC/-fJ-J- "'7g-~1
9~ rh:/,
oo.o~6.a.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: \L- '-
Please Print Name: gl AJ
c(;;'?any:L....~~ '"2.. \ <;LO)CA!O"-
,\, \ 1\ 'uo_~ 2 \
P;.;;ld;.,:ss: "'2'2Io~ ~)1- ~\)t""-
';;7..~""S6.u-l''''~,,,,,,,, ~ '1 v'to'-/
.
Phon": 4, ~ L{- .s't 10
000570
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CaJMat Cajon Creek Project Specific It'lan 90-01.
San Bei'1"'~rl;no n~s the jobs, the revenues and the busine,ss that
, .. thi project will provi .
Signature: ~.
PleII~tName: /JI.zF~ . /VI. .CEt1RCe--
company~fQI!tu y 'o/-lIsSocllf Tes__
.
Address: .t17 ~L( IV WIfk:K$l'!-fl I'1j/F
-.S1J;/ i6r/;./ j. {! # 9'.:u; () J
Phone: tlt1 r / J'tf3- ?7/j
000584
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINOREcElvro
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: Is I-? ;;) (' I H ~ R. r,:J' \.
-.
Company: fill p P':f BoY CI9 n, (..vA \' it
Address: /9- S D ~ J.I /jlJ 24 ,v I
~ I '?' (' A I::: 9"'] .....It) '"
Phone:i) f r' ~ P- 0 V
(!o'l
0004 (1 8
r
JOllS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
is project will provide.
Signa
--
-.J,o h/l!'llf?/'
Please Print
Cnrnpany:
A'lldress: It",q 1,,1. 11I/~1M/'~ A,,,,.
.1--;)/1 J1N/J?rd.'M (,,/1 ;..14/1..
) .i
Phone:9R9- RRtI.'''-1w'
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name:~ r, tl:L ~~~\A~--lx
Company: Cj-?- \ S_~A)C CL~
Address: 107 '6l Qd.o.. G:..Ai"~, ~ I 0 L.
~ ~~O.N~l C fr- . 'i d-- S LJ \P
Phone: 90q '7 ~ ~ .. "I 7 Lf (p
000434
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Betnardino needs the jobs, the revenues and tJle business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name: J" )111)pp 7_dJ..IJj('Jff)')
Company: fV./'dma:f I'~, f'/lmdJw Jdf ../JIPJ?,d/Y'~
AdAIess:jA! 7~ rf7t1Jyj~'Y1.J 2Jf .
cYiJ J MPn hy Au /Jd / M b/
~ I
Phone/ 9'1I~) 1>19 -?fcq,j 9
.
~-~<~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat ClUon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jObs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: 0 IJ iLIZ 6 U S )/tJiZS S
Company: C -'7- I SJlIl~C!f?'J 0
Address: -Z '7-1 0 /1/ '.711 L-,9~
C &4tf'{l7'd){l-/~ xu L 19
77.- 1//./
Phone: cf I:> tI r '.? 9 "7 iJ
000435
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~ en! A ttk Q ]). )
\
Company: ~i C;.hj \ It)"... ,(lJl{ Ll~
Address: ,-)d I {, f' ~ q k.J. a JA ri (j (9J ..#-j J ')
~~~(JLM1 ,~q.)-\.InlJ
~ .
oon4;~ 1 Phone:
RECEIVED
HAY 0 7 1993
RECEIVED
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~C'~R/~ .4. 4J/1/?#..5
Company: {?L;4/7Z/LY .R/ 0#~~C!ASC
Address: "?-Il../O E. ///G#.4'IAi.iJ, ST.E. /d<./
/
~,./ 2c:-e.hebl/~, (?/! 9~YtJ Y
.
000432 Phone: 9~9~ 1d;~ - 39 76.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name~ rJ JJ d v.) tAl f:) a CA-....-
Company: M+l ttll- r~
Address: 7.50.5 CiA fa ,<:B ~2108
OO(l4~3
Phone:
b8S- rtY.)tf
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CaJMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needo/!f~ jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name:---1JAIJ!JJ t], 1< I M
Company:~ \'? oj ctrf?- ~~\pt~
~~1
Address: /:>:rP e,- Ifrj '"~. .~ ~I
S g C,4 !~" ~ 1'3'3-
Phone: \9c) 2) f!tf!oi
~. -=
.--,.~:.. :.-~
.;' - "'-. --
~. ,., --
"'- ,,~ -
~, .' ._~::::;;-~
.~~,- ~-- "::/
,-
onr4fl
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: CHUN :cr.. (A)6N
Company:--.JJ)~ e. 3(C'l~E'R LU2iAJMt-
Address:--J-l{-\ \ e.1:D4U( JrD~
S'e C.Jr '1 ~tfa V
!'Phone: f, Rs - '1119 0
0004(",
RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000466
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~ +-;{,J ;k/tJ'II' If{}h
Company: ~4ot iu;, y :1./ Ac.'h~"
Address: 2:l.I {5 E }I'91 kill! AWl
S~h &VlqAlvd,'l..,lll c!t11 q 2~(J~
Phone: ql7q - ~6'''t'- 59715.
I'
; J "'~
'~tttl.! '
J"../
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: 5 UN
J:::I~
00040G
Company:
Address: 70?~ l({qtlCth.JO Clff?-t1VCr uJ
11l0t1UJ1JO cA- ('Y7 -rt
Phone: ;f 6J-- ~7 'f'lr-
RECEIVED
MAY 0 7 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Betilatdino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
SignatUre: sHrt~.1 W t] eUt1Y1'l~
Please Print Name: fuet 1 ~,l...l11 \ \ in.m :s
Company:
""-....-: /f-/7d.J /l7I'AS,(fLJ () l.
&J..A..J 'RAPdapclwtf) Ocz/ It
/
Pho)!t'(9:J9) ??91 ~;:S(o?olp
. , '.'1'
RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 1993
-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
": MAY 0 8 1993
,"
YES, I suppollWhe CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
~ "':,'
._--".",--"
~:,:
,-
-
-
-
'.-
.,..,=-",if''-'"''
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 1993
YES, I support the CaJMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
~~:; LL~.c,
~",:, ~"'..6
Address: JZ17~q~ ~#'e
~4,v/ d/y' ~.wy
0004 ! G Phone: ;f'~i'62 K'~s'7
0004j(;
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
.
YES, I support the CaJMat C~OD Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name~fnQ ~ Pln V1tJ 0 t.j)Jq
Company:
~;:~~,p~~
Phone:9t19- '%1Pt/- d/89c::,
RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 1993
/\,
, ~,
0604~d)
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-61.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~ ~
Company: 0~4 ~A14 '
Address: :;Jb~@o C;://{}T ~v.c
f/~hLC)4P/; ~/T
Phone: CJh:J -9J~?'
t 1~.{ ,_~
RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 1993
000400
r.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
" MAY 0 8 1993
"';"ll';
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-81.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~l2Py ~
Company: <<el!L{vG; rL.lJ/wN/t
Address:--2--'3 b 1 ,>(tJ2V~ M~~
<' e C/r q"2-- f.(D 1-
'Phone: Qh~ S:J-O~
).
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this projec ill provide,
000583
Signature'
Please Print Name: 5c;:' F "-
Company: ~ac&<(!" A6:C'C,''1''lnC<:;
Address: ;:37U AI. //J78Ct?l/f1tJ
~ ~.eN. b 9':Z</'oY
Phone: 'to" / t3~3 - B9 / / .
I
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 8 199
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. ~
San Bemacdino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~) /3!;......../ c-: ~".
Please Print Name: /~/hNA1 ,/!. ~.-IE~l'
Company:
Address:
V093 ~-"~-,,dA jJ,~
~ ~~~. ~.
~&J4 %f3 -..53.;;l::2..
#;l"'OY'
Phone:
000581
-,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
-
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
..... this project will provide.
.
Signa~re: ) /{ /Lh~ ;f ~ r-
Please Print Name:~t!- tr1I~ Iv #.A1Z....T
Company:~-L~tzeT 'if ,/ ~ ./J.-d-&-C-.
, 'V
Add~: :2 7~~)f1J 7J&17~ ~.
~;
~ ~/ r:;#:-- Cj'~y()<./
Phon(,: t!J '" 9'
tr8' ~ - ~9//
.000577
:/
'"
-
onntt i ~;
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: -re V rt' H.crvcr
Company: ~ ~___ OR/- ~
Address:
RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 0 8 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San~rnardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: \? ~ \ 0.--1. ~:....-.-
Please Print Name: ~ 0- <"'- ~ \ c..... ~ . '- \.< '. "'-
Company: S ~ Q. \ \ c..~ u \< ~ \ \- '&
Address: 'd} '0 '--\ ~. ~~..Q {\{Y'o.C'A \^
SC\v---
Phone: C; O~
~hC>
J
~
<=J ~ '-lo,-\
88~- 8"'\ \\
000579
~,~" . ,
~,^._."
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDffiO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 1993
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Pian 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name:
000417
CO~FY:
Address:
~/1/,j?j)~/1/(dAA~?:^-4 r?-~([) 5
Phone: ~('f7~ fI .
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
, .. . HAY 0 8 1993
YES, I supportJheCalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bemartliiti'needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name: 1Q\I'I'c/C.L t, mC((ll1cl'l'd
Complmy: S Vd\cu-~ i Cl5sC( .
ADdress: 1 ~ J ~ N, lJJ (} tf itN\ClI\ auf. .
SQI\ b CfflClIJ l'nG1 Co- - q)q(yj
Phone: (70Q)$5W7:J-8Qll
00058:0
00040~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat CiYon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
thi~ project will provide.
Name: fI A /<1 AI ):j ;q
Company:
Address: ) (./ 7.1 Al' (,U A / I 1.) 1/ <?
3 - I] C 1+ .Ie:. 7 '2 ~/ n f../
Phone: R f Lj - 0 y. '3 Y
aD1)
RECEIVED
HAY 0 8 1993
000534
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaJMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: F f3L-- /}C ,A. ~ te.1V I4-pJ d 42 "Z.-..
Company: ~,'..r iA ue v fR t!!"f).. L. '"r)
Address: 3.50 S ~. 1h'1!.L#4-I-J G.-<-L
#;.sL~ 1, Cc-. CtZ-3Yh
Phone:C'1d fj X'C"2-- y.roc>
'~t~\ ~fB
~\%~m
~".J
j'~~f
~ ~1Y//.
\~/
JOBS FOR SA1~ BERNARDINO Ilttl.ll
_1b1ll1l8JB
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name:
S4 J~JV.s
CllRlflllll} :
/ .$ (,, )r 1 r(..
(I~ fbL~9/.i).-
Address:
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. MAY 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Si_~~
Please Print Name: / _ ~d.
Company:
Addres~3/) r:s E _ h~ t. /ll (J I /C.t:!- I k
6#1V,'RELAIJJl!/)//i)O, & 9Jzo/'6
,
Phone:
000305
00(\'")('''''
,... j
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: O~ o/~M
?
Please Print Name: A L- B e r 1 15 e.. y /11 t:) L () 5
.
Company: IV A F 13
Address: StJ' 5 5" b~#IV/I D/i
)A/v'BettVA/1 !)j)(t:) C/\L--
Phone: 88'--/- fYI /3
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
o()rq 12
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Company:
Address: /,{ If j1/ I
I. /
Phone: J ~/, 5 71
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
..
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECE\'lEO
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: a~_4/U2/ #t7~
Please Print Name:~ A/ IV ~p f, tJ / (J S-
o 0 I
Company:
Address: I h,{j? vV L/~~ /
0(\(\ oll ~
Phone: 9 {)q g <{ <t . d-. ~ 94
RECEIVEO
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO MAY 1 01993
YES, I support the CaJMat C;qon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000387
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
. / this prOjec~ll provide.
Name: ~A~ &h-
Company: 5/ /YJ'PAA'
A~t~) t::::}~ ,1~j/4
Phone: ff Y / - .S-1, (//
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaJMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: Iho In 11 E, -flu; Sf 0 (.j
Company:
Address: ~ 10 () J; II j}!l i L lIS ;; tJ t3.
SA) 8I3RNflf.D INO) Cfl. q ~~/7J
000388 Phone:~ 81;;- 4- 1[; (
~/P~I t2~ t J ~J;pJ
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
000388
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: /::- R k"() L. pERsoN
.
Company:
Address: I <J;lS WJ V /N~ 6;
ISA-AI BG<NARd/~b CA q;Zt.jJ/I
Phone: ~g 49703
-
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
//,~~ prject :i~l r i~~.
Signature: ~
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address:
Phone:
{)00314
-~
RECEIVED
HAY f 0 1993
i
000384
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaJMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
Name:
I
Company:
Address:..1fi:l g ~es;,-r s ~D ()D+
L.An )St>)\ ,f\{l^ ~~n\J ~ I
Phone:~! <:t-6~~\J
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O-01MAY 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
. is project will provid?,
Signatu '
.
Company:
.
r ~~.M
Phone: 7')1)' 5 - 0 ~ ~ /
fr;
000258
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. HAY I 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:CDo~+:~ ~~
-.
Please Print NameCJ ~ Al+,c:::" fJ Au..J' N~~
Company:
Address: dJf f cC:; (h 'A &-0J ~ ~
5b^'- ,ibo^ ~ ~_'~1"Q CfJ-Ij)O
Phone: <::6 1/1 ~ I S ~7
00025.
OO()3(iS
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~~c\:.\~\:.~
YES, I support the CaIMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.",~'t , \\ ,~~?,
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues'apd the business that
this project will provide. . _.
Signature: /ju'ILt. P L ~
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address: / C/ 6t. uI. r ~~.
. S~-,.~. Ca-.'j).l.{j/
Phone: &"~ ~ - i-/ ~ 7/
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE'VEtl
M~'1 1 61993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
c
Signatu .
00025C
Please Print Name: D N
Company:NE-{L/ ~p/~ /J7;C<; ~Srtjfu/~clf
Address: Ir"ir;- uJ !1ti-- -'i'
~;//-/fI AIVPo I OA Cja--(f! /
Phone: ~ g7 - ~- ;rJ,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~
\\EtE\~~\)
"'~'( \ \\ \~~~
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000341
. ~" ..~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
\~t(.~
t':t,~
v.~ \\ ,~~'?>
,,~ '
YES, I support the CaIMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Namepf~/f-~~;&
Company:
Phone:
0003[<~,
oon340
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO \~~\)
.tt~
"'~'{ \ \\ ~~~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~O.A il) ~
Please Print Name: ~ee.) ( . Fo LA. Sf',
Company:
Address: \ ~ 1 .5 I f'v\ <1. (I ~ \-.5f.
-;) I ~ I ) Co. q 'J-, If (D
Phone: 3 3' I~ ~3 ~ If
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
aECEWEt}
MA1 \ 0 \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:7'tfcuy ll1(!d~
PleasePrintName:MllrGy PlCZt!-C- J4 ,It')
Company:
Address: f) () /}; 0)( n?,")....
,
f(J- ~ \ !..:- t> {!ffi Q 'J.-"?, --; fa
.
Phone:Cf df 1/:;; ,.:s /<2 S- Lj
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
nEtEtvEO
. MA~ \ 0 \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01:
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature~e;;// /~~
Please Print Name5.k~/ / ~LL'~ S
Company:
Address: /;l / ~ .P ff
~41 ~4u.~~k. ~f' -&29'.?r
Phone: 7/v ,pcr/9"~~ 3
, /
RECE'~Etl
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO w~~' tl \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~ '10-11/1 tJ./7 ./
Please Print Name:. - r- DL1- ,-V+:-j1) Y:::' ')
----
Company:
0', ",/ c::; 'A !(~
Address: 1 '--)),! . L f)iPf-/ 1
f) I ~4 '
G/l!~ =-.y.: y A/Il-ff/ /717 9,;;11//'()
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RrCf.\~En
~~~ , Q \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
~
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
.ECE\'4En
~~'i \ \\ \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:/( CfYk:- r ~)-/~ c
Please Print Name: ,x ~) D0 111 Lf)( Z 1 VLS
Company:
Address:).. , l '5,-l) IV Wt{-. 'tJt<-e 11 )4v!,€-
~_, /-1'7, t?<? I '7';2 Lf03-
Phone:\<',
~
- -
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~GVL0~ ~\At).(l.J--
Please Print Name: t\ CvnJ U-1 b '-"- \<\ O--r\-
.
Company:
Address: ~ l '\.0 t N e>-l\- cl- S\-. c.>--f- t 3~
_5,. Boa" 9'21/2Jft
Phon~t:\~'1.\.94-1o~()
RECE'VEll
MA'f 1 Q \993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature/J6.A~. ~
Please Print Name: 1"-S~/:)h: ~~ H~llo 'WLjI
r ,
Company:
Address: (I s .5' ~ f K" 'V 19 V '(
.51 u!/.' ~/ 9;;Z4/1
Phone:
---
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~s project will provide.
Signature: ~ ~wf--
Please ~t Name:.J;;<;-f..pk :ttt1 QJ'X
REtE\VED
M~Y 1 {) 1993
\
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECElVEtl
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:Y J1 ~'.J ~~
Please Print Name:)< G--t 31 D J.zlr.lZ. f-
Company:
Address:;( ;;><.0 l qO
. S I !q!r
t
WCV\..cL 'b\- ~\:.. ~*
c:t~ " 92yZJ H
Phone:)( '?,I..L:, L\ -, o-~ 0
,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO~EtE\~En
~~'f \ 6 \993
YES, I support the CaJMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide,
~ --P ~j
Signatu ,.. (l).J'lJ.. ,fII~ ~
Please Print Name:flJ\'1 {\~ C"/hJliA,-\-\\' CtVV\
"
Company:
Address: 'l306J J p r-.\ l'MlI ~lm~~
<- C;/ 3-, ~ I 2'?.;:z tj / IJ
Phone: fk 2 ~.J7jJ / .
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE\~EO
MJ.'f , (1 \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~~ H~
Please Print Name: D'OeJfll 11 ()ytve;)
Company:
Address: 1 y~, yJ1.h ADr,Jb
L; -0. La q;jlllD
Phone: h I U) L\~:\ -~ Y b ~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE'VED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan ~AY 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
. roject will provide.
. ......}
SIgnature: ;Y
La-
''',
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address: ~ / ~ ~ 3 U ~ .tJ L/J t:l1/;7 _ -i.-I/J _
: (;I)~d/i() Co 9~r/( /
Phone: /' 1 D Cj gt 0 - 4.-/0
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. MAY 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
d this ~roject will provide.
S~wre, 0<>>!t: '-1JJ ~
Please Print Name: ~ , Ng, Y
Company:
Address:55b W.!:J~ Jg A p ( )j / I
~Slj'/ ~,s:~I\;4~f)';/,~ d.1 CJJ/I/t)
Phone: (X!J1J g'~"": /Mh
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ~
~,;.t';'\"~
\ \\ \99~
YES, I support the CaJMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan ~1.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide. .
Signature: ~ ftMj j - ~
Please Print Name: X LJ REA .,9 lAn, "\"1'tN
Company:
Address: X =1} ij SfWCJ-IG} ~ '
:3 . r{3 , OJ.. q //<100;
Phone: ;>< (0' () q) 97 S ~ (/Cf:E q
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
\tECEWEO
Ml'( \ tl \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature\.~ ~
Please Print Name:~ l II Err Mil ICT,j.M...-
Company:
Address:~ 1'lrJ-1) ~ ~ ~ ..J:9 fA., ?~'/JJ
Phone:--004) i z 1~ q {p /;.3
,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~EeE\'4EO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O-eua~ \ n \993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:v.. ~0..c.~. ,
Please Print Name: ! / tI (' /e/I:;-/ (like/'
Company:
- ~-G
Address: X. // Y5 ~ /. vn;t/
.
r:::; !~ ;1.7 cJ?,~ / /, -
; ,"Sr- 4/ _ '~I ('?
Phone: f-- )is'7 - '2 -; t/ tj
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO n
. ttECE\VEu
. . MAl \ n \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01:
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~ A. Ulkh)
Please Print Name: 4< ON A. 'V...I,l:So ~
\
Company:
Address: r>.~ I (j,3 $/1 tJ(! J./ 1::-2 ~+ .
$ IS 0;.. , q~<lo c.f
Phone:( qlJ q) '67 )-~:J-~q
-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
\\ttt\~~n
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90~~ , \\ 'e.'??'
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: 'I- ~ /U - ~ / ftl1/qLJ
,
Please Print Name: f ROM/!/; ~~ M ddll1f!t1'1)
Company:
Address: I 1/ D 5?' ~~ r-/'on 51 -#- B
(
.S' ) e ~/ 9:21/ I(
Phone: '" ~[)()-65-6s-
,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~t:.CEWEO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. ~~'i \ 0 \993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: Yf~ ~~ f,. buJ(
Please Print Name: X '- \. K'i-'1J lJ 2. t<.L Lr l
Company:
Address: Y f() OJ 7 R,jlrv {~lA..> Skt +-
~"hJ JSt.Rf\.I&12.0 (N:Q C PI OjJ-'t 10
/
Phone: )((7/'( ) ~{"] - S "to "/
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
REtEWEO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O-Ol.M~'i \ t\ \993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:7 l);+/Y7E <::; Ale cV MCl Y7
Please PrintN~ :2 '_ Y __
Company:
Address:Y :2 <:('1 4 C-k.N ulc/C){:f :It IS
,Q~/~ ~.
Phone: ./ ~7 4- - "3. q Cj ()
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~ECE\'JEO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90~~ \ tl \993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:/<-~ ~ (iJ~/) ,
Please Print Nam~ C! / Y j e, J I ctk y' 1-(1 II S
Company:
Address:\.6 Z } (, I au/ ~ s fe V M -?? Jr<e
./
Phone: xi 1", 9- ~ ~ 6 - <;tC) l/S-
v
.--..-,-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE\VED
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
Signature:
Please Print Name:
company:J OloV} W> 1 D~,
Address: ~ fJ
0003~O
Phone: ~ (\1 r /) v/J-
'\.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEWEO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01: 1'19~
MA1 \ 0 \~ ;)
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
f4wC<-n( ~
Signature: JcC/<'l-D1." .!S J) ~ic (> ...c;rN
Please Print Name: XCWCUiULr> r5.e,-;noN
Company:
Address:)( 2(.(,1 ~H C41Z.LtJ ;qUe.
Phone: ,,1 ~ ~7 G'3 -zo
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
\tECE\~EO
t>\~'i \ t) \ggg
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signaturefi. j A~;~^ fjA ~/jJ~
Please Print Name: ) n. \ \Cl., J \ G L"(' f.Q '<\
Company:
Address:.l~/Y-/ N.. W' ( L<',c'::J\ ~~
Phone: -g~ CJ- ~c~ '-4 ~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
\lEtE\'IED
. t4~'f , {} \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~o. ~ ~
Please Print Name: \Q('("(:\'JCLC.0~~
Company:
Address: \~6 Ui~~Ct)
~1\f)e~,rU C0- .6QL{\.f
Phone: (~ty) ~-G"~~
.
000396
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO \lECE\'JE'
~~~ \ 0 \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
NameJtc_72!ti'It:! 0.Asf (1ft-<;;
Company:
Address~ )~-;- ?fr/r7t1I\./~ 11-r/lJ.
~ Re.{'A/~.o;/Vc) / (}/J-. 5'd- f///
Phon~{J g) f4?B</ - 93/ CJ
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CaJMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 9O~AY 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
is project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name: ,~ '!-IIrJ ~ fk:, ':;//;S-
J
Company:
Address: N &, AI, _r/ frl71uJ4Y ~IS
~ Atrlo (14 Y'Y-I/C/cf
Phone: 9g9 -IBiO
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O-01.HAY 1 01993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signatur~ .at-~~-) ~dJ
Please Print Name: ILl-ie/ tL c5slra d "'"
Company:
Address: ;J1{'1 tf q ~(Ivt "'b f
L]f!fi an (J (1[(1 1,;) y /0
3'lr~Yl{)C;
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
,
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~.-?1A .&~L1bJ~
Please Print Name: tjolt4YJdJ4. JfI,h )J"l.<Y)rJ
Company:
Address:.J:n h e, ~ ~ ~ f'&':>
&~ YDeJl2"'('\'Pl~E'll'vi?l ~. 'iJ;,HD~
Phone: 68 ~- '-t b qe
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECE,,'Etl
M~' 1 \l '993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:f#~ a:{~h/4
Please Print Name~; q OOIlYIC). 1" \ (0
Company:
Address:2SCfo !Y\or\',( 0\ C .p,,~( Dc-U \J€ ~rQCf'~2
f1C).,~ (y{" 'l\D.c\, '('f') l ('<:, I.~" '11"11 \
Phone: ?,'Ri -92.\2 (q09..)
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO \tEt~\~t\)
M~'{ \ tl \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
Please Print Name:
f{ GLiz0L ~-!-v~1 tV
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this ~ect will provide.
Signature:
Company:
Address: d-L11 L( 0 V {IU-. g;r
SCXv) 8JI?tJ' oJ! .7~1f/O
Phone: 32 I 3 '7 tJ J
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ftECEWEO
M~'f \ 0 \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signatul'&;- ~Ac\^('.-L..--- '{I10/~
Please Print Name: '0A.A\l" fA- f'(\,^*i~f
Company:
Address:.ll( b tD F:S~rJ 1)+.
~~f)('\() (\ 0-, 0j dJ-) H
Phone: ~~l~3 \ d- /
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ltEtE\~~~
"r..'t , \\ ~~
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~m /l -JrpU/ //f{5
PleasePrintName:!~{1~ra A. 7i-q2{//~C;
Company:
Address: /~q<z ~ fJau/c1ool1 I<)J~
:)Qlit Nerl1ord/vU5 CQ
Phone: Y/.D
p;? 0,..0 f/?- (?
,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE\VEU
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. MAY 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
?q~;/1 f~
Please Print Name: J 6 )1 (I r ~ (1 LeJ -A.
Signature:
Company:
Address: !) l/ /7, IJ. fYle.Y,'d; /1 jJ sf. .;f. bC(
5-4J/d. A-O/l/lJ<lrJ; fiO (JJjC't:;C-IIQ
Phone: ~ X f - ),!) '/0-
I JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINq\:.t\:.\~\:.n
~~'{ \ t\ \99~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~/1~';v 11/~;J< *(9/n
Please Print Name: q ft b,l'J)( I Q (tK/; I 0 ,III
.,
Company:
Address: //f7!)2 Do If:' Ji-' Pp-l- ISO
$ (AM J:)p,.(JJClCd/~O CA Cj2ijJif
Phone: C 9J 7) YO~ -~670
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ~EtE\'4Etl
",~'i , \\ \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide~
Signature: J{7 ./ J /74 L/"~ -
6' /
Please Print Name: U. 5 f /1 v' (7 L () A
Company:
Address: ,)7"1;U. /H e r {OJ, '1<1".<1 5 f 1M
'5/Qfi/(J !?Pi7 cA; /l r rLr;U /'1 flA,9,~r;1 (j
Phone: xtt -79 /9
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDIN09.ttt\~~\)
\ \\ \~~?J
,,~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~~it~[d (LY~r?-
Please Print Name: &;;~h,;.::YA (/)~.bb
),
Company:
Address:
?5~.:;- ///tJ!dh 4/9d/7/9
-
c..SP/7 &/UJ/9~/J{;, 6; f?tf'>>S
,
~9'f ggtJ-3t:?tf/
-
Phone:
00034S
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
t~\'t~~
\\~ \ ~ \~~~
Vift.'t
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
\-
Signature: (~~d
Please Print Name: Y/9u/d dJt?bb
Company:
Address:
~ /lJtjtlY% &mi/71?
~ 8Gttll/JJ'rcJt71' 01 0L/tJ~
&V &525- 30(R /
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: iX.o j A, ...AroA F'rY\
,
Please Print Name: \J 1 n \C;... G,n...d ~
000308
Company:
Address: ~\ 2 Pe~1 \O~1'1 iLl.e., ~e.
~If\ -:&> n(\(,,\i ell: (\ () I r fL (1''6<-10 7
Phone: qm '3"(;1 ~ 10 z. i t..f
~ttt\~~\)
\I \ \\ ~~~
~~\
000307
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~o~ t') \:k..n J\Jn [)
Please Print Name: "3',..,,"'- ('. ~ eo.. ~ ",,,,"
Company:
\\~c~\~~\)
~..'( \ tl \~~3
I
Address: 6'7sY"2 b'-3~..CJ-YV1A)re. A--0e
~.,c\.\\o ~u- q-z. 3 '7'=
,
Phone: OJ ClOf Ir\- "2...-\ - ~ \ (.0 Z
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO \\f.tt\~t\)
~,,1 \ \\ ~~~
YES, I support the CaJMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~;~, /~J~n.
Please Print Name: LA/ria 1.-( )p/6h
Company:
Address: (H) I ~ f? I /\-i , ~ ) i~ JI J rJ /J,
l-L~At ~ IlJidMJ?
Phone: qoq aBo./ f2{J i
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
\\tct\~Etl
~~'( \ t} \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
r J)
signature:c){~ o..J1..JU IVL'] "flLhh
Please Print Name: L 6 A,<J rJ E vY\ (,; A H~
Company:
Address: "?> DC:; X' 7J ~ r O(\N) Qr~ S . ~
C A Q ";)L.{OS
Phone: ~()q ~~(o -q :SIC(
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO \\i.ti.\~t\)
,,~'i \ \\ '~~3
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: [! J; Q~ ~ ~
Please Print Name: ot\o.. I{ l i'\f\...Q \ ~ JJ.Un
. -
Company:
Address: ~1J.c2, tJ. c-rA.a Dr-:I\J{) 9'.
_ ~ fA R, V\,((j ,rr( ,GYVl1 (). q7-~6~
I
Phone: lYOq) ~C\ - <,(0 l{! I
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~ECE\'JEtl
. ~~'i \ n \99'3
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: hm ~I kG ' -:;;7.(76";
P1= Print N~'cJmj/;~pf
Company:
"
Address: ?) ~
1) fllir' ,r/[{ ~,
/
Phone:
&;Z--Y06cY
000395
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECE\'JEl)
M"'f \ tl \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
fl this project Wi2rovide. /J
Name: //4'y?//l ///c&-54- H4!tu/a/
f
Company:
Address: ,ell- /~ ~~ #.
Phone: ./ jTf' - ~ ~ l c::J
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEWEtl
M~" \ n \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~ject will pro~id~
Signature: t. k.o- ~ ""~____
./
Please Print Name: T Am Ii t u A
",
Company:
/}(j/7 . .'" ,I -I Q7/(}9--
Address: d.. _ i2 )). /YJ e y, 01f1 IV.5 -1/
5'/J~ .q.J)/1tbifrJ,' /J 6 r!A .9,9C(/0
Phone: Qg'. 3<t { C;
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: (~;'k//2-) ~ U/I ~
Please Print Name: V ( inK'. A-- Yeft'W '" ~
Company:
Address: 9/~~ #.11j v:E/
U"(111 a Ut/7/lf7dCr-;{) a f c(;:t/f 0
Phone: 99 tf- 99tA-:<J
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat CaYon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Nam~~J/) A/~
Company:
Address: ///$ 1f/5SIa/t/ 51.
~/o ~A- 9NI/
O 0 (\ .-, (1 ~. ? <II ./ It:? .e ()
',)v I Phone:....., 75 - 1/ J/)
RECEIVED
HAY , 0 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: l~m.w 2~4
(/
Please Print Name: h#-t:f'A/ Z~,a
Company:
Address: $/2) ~/A%.'I 4#
~7~/// /~~~/~
Phone: 0' ~ - ,:1 /d:' /
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project wilJ provide.
Signature:~ f\\)1 AYl '~G{\~~
PleasePrintName:S~A7 n(\ ~(::)(\€~
Company:
Address: 31 '..1<6 1\\, rl e u')E! \ t\ e V-e."
q)(l \ '\ ~'\ If'.() , (' (\
\ "
Phone: ~ "rll- (04u~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE\VEtl
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90.'( 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~hiS project will provide. ,
Signature: /J77//t,./ 0 ~~../d
/3; t/ - J/o .
Please Print Name: /JJeh._ J. p f' .(<)
Company:
Address: c:, ..510. P Ii -tit> f' )
0aA/ &c/r; C.4 9,:2</tJ~-/tb?~
I
Phonel9tJ 9) J1cf'7 - ~~, 5".3
-
n{)(i~Ar::
..q '-'
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: (h do I) INt'.
. f), --f. n
Please Pnnt Name: - III a t--'e Re_ c_
Company:
Address: cQ6 '75' ,{) AordtrKJ ,V
.JAAI .If # I<n()l"dl~{) {Q 9.:2<j{JS
Phone: 91)9 gg 7 6L 7-/JI
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
000281
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE\VEO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. MA~ 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: (J/;1t1#7/ ~ liMA 1./\~
Please Print Name: thl1rm':r7 ;k.~y, ~"i:J
Company:)1! .z;nVl I~ 111;/ r14Qv-,,/'
,
Address:J/7/ U J...".ic.JI/I/1 <j,
/;"/l (5Nnorf,,,.., cA 1.2-'-11/
. I
Phone=( 90 'I) PJ' 7 - j Y' / I
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-CMAY 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~V'J)) d!ff: P Pit ~
Please Print Name: I/ndre0 ~ eOk.fi'7Clr?
o"""",,,erJl Nidi ~aJ/
Address: t,t;:;t;:; U). M/")r~~r7
/2& 110; C-fl ?cJ.3-7,
Phone:C'l () Cf) {? f2.O - C d-Y9'
00028L
,
000284
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE\VED
MA~ \ \l \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01:
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
_~th~ project will provide.
Signature: ~ Lfh ( ~knt)
Please Print Name: in,,! 4- ~ fl.~.j rD m
Company: ~I+I /IA IJ-+ (!o,
, ,
Address: f/,3,J.. Ti41UIJA!f} :2++.
SIJAJBet:AJ/JRdt:UD (lA, Cj'J)f./1I
.
Phone: C/oq ill-J:,5()f.t
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
...-- /
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~ t vuJ-J~
Please Print Narne:AJt.. Ll r 1_ -P P \~ J.. )0 bh.
Company:
Address: ~~~ N' 6,lVeJ)p/L4l. -s...{ .
~^^ .& 11M y-,.{ ,eM leA' qZ-I(D~
Phone:-( 400) ~6 - :3 (up /
00023.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~ project ~i11 provid~
Signature:_~ 1(i:L"i"~/P~
Please Print Name: -::S-fI'tI1 F 5 k t[ ~-nt <.,IrN fl E Rs
Company: (Q I JM q+ (t'i.
Address: L..j '1 5 R --0 )( ~ {' cA
~IQ) +-0) (1+. Orz~7 ~
Phone: (7)4'> 'if2 0- (q 4 )
RECE\VEO
MAY 1 () 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ftEtElVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90_0rAY 1 0 199~
onn~4L
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: A~ Q ~
(/
Please Print Name:J.- A- RR. L~ R ~ O^J eJ(
Company:
Address: ~ - 1~e..V-Cll !p-s.
SA/\) B.e.-rQ rq nl\J(') C rq 9~ c/O?
Phone: r 0/ - 3'6 I - to r c;;
oon34S
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this proj ect will provide.
Signature~ ~~
. ~.
Please Pnnt Name: ,
FI4 R "
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
Company:
Address:
Phone:
e......+
~(~..,.~: ^" C". ct2'tef'
~ ft7..;aSI.~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cj\jon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
""-"1(:% ~r/~
Please Print Narn . /J1A7I{Y 'jj /J, (JrJA/e.g
Company:
Address: g - lip r elLI e..g C T
S /l AJ JJ.P r /(JC/ rdtlV () ell '1~ rtJ f
Phone: <Iii 9- (if / - 6,(~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MAY f 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name:
Company: . SI
Address: ~ C; v.J, (;~( ~L1L .
$:z~^ ~ (' V\OV d ~.v\.Q) " @A. C!2Ji6S
/~ L
Phone: ( C1.LE ) cr<i<:(j - 3 o~ \
\
~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY f 0 .993
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: d1Q tJA ~ <llio' ~ )
Please Print Name: G (\) tf-P It ~f~
,
.
~':
l
Company:
Address: 73rt ~ ~11..Sel J4/W cArJR.
:t -t: '12Lf/O
Phone: ( .. . -5&0/ ()J'L ttf-R!~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE\'JEG
M~'( \ {) \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: /;/4J/~ C:;;l/~
Please Print Name: ill R fa /'P III Ij AJ de;(' (d" >1.-
,
Company:
LJ -&-8
Address: .j~d- 7 f' t1:J Sf--
~ CjJ-J27; ~~
000:2rC
Phone:
000277
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~ttE\~tt\
",~'i \ \\ ~~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: 13~&/ <'./ /'tI it;J
Please Print Name: 6; \-+~c.. (,1),0;\ \ .'S""
,
Company:
Address: .j ~ ~ W . (6 t\1. :sf .
Phone:
~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
. \\ttt\'1'C.~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. ,,\ \\ 'e~?'
"'..\
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
. . ill provide.
Signatu .
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address:
~ ([J (/?/ a-/ /'# 4r' /
S,,-f)
,?Y?'- d?J76
Phone:
000276
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ~t.t,t\~t\\
"'~ ' \\ ~~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:g/ <-y; tJ~
Please Print Name: L U B fIr R ~.es
~
Company:
Md='e~= ~
' .d:.. (J A9P'f/j
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO \'4t~
\\ttt
VI t>.'1 \ \\ \~~~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provid .
Signature:
/
Please Print Name:
Company:
..-, <~::;.:;'~:~~~O<fII
Phone: ~ 8' IT ~ '/17 '() -tf
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
1tEtEWE\l
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. ""'f \ \\ \993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, revenues and the business that
this project will pro .
Signatu .
PleasePrintName:~\'~ "j 'Y-0-C{ MjV~'s- ~
/7 <J /II) ~ r'\
Company: ~ (J~~ ~ X7~
Address: \'", 'S 'i <3, ~b J r~-----'~'.'/
o Q ~(... \') 5---O( /-l--J
Phone: {C.J 1 - .!!.. _ --1..
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
J!.t!.\~!.\l
. , \\ 'a~3
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. ~~'{
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~,"\N)J~ \~ uJJ \l. "'-
Please Print Name: !iZ 6 \'\ c... \ cl vJ ~ \ \ -l..f
f
Compal\y:
Address: \ 7 l.\ I L 0 L '" f' c...J 0 <C;i
~ "'VI t3 <.(' Y\. t.J' t ,'1\0 0\ ~ ~ \ \
Phone: q V 9 Il g 1,;', ~IA: \ V
'.
JOBS- FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ftEtE\~Et}
t\~~ \ \\ \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: c... -(1
Please Print Name: L r / (', :;;" It (V
Company: !/t111!.- 1 E~j,
Address: i 55 '% Iv ~S<../:A.-I e
.~Ui'-t & A 111 v i,,,:o (W
Phone: 9() 1- If yf.- Oo/:z.
(
{
y;t 'Iii
,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ttE.\'4~~
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-0i"..~ \ \\ 'a~~
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~iS project will provide.
Signature: ~ Q L~
Please Print Name: f hi ~ -y} t' J (.).. ('I """ 0 r" ......
. I
Company:
Address: J l./1l 1,,<./ !:-/? b J / it' -H
Phone:J"f-? rf'?& 0 H7. 2/3.J---
-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~(ct.\~tt)
~\\\\~~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01~fl\
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: -.,~ ~~. ~ 4 ~
Please Print Name:J~). LL 0(.... ~ J.....v....
Company:
Address: Jd'9 ~ AI .iF. 'S+ "".2..
Sot"'" 73s,..v,,~ c:J" #4- ~p .,~" d.s~
Phone: 9,<; <if>" f'( . Q I P'lS-
000252
0003::;8
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ftttE\'IE\l
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. t\~~ \ \\ -
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: OolrM ~:h
Please Print Name: Do(' \,." r a k ~ ""- ~ -\{..
Company:
Address:
_< I t/r
I '
~I
I
Phone:
oon342
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ,ttt\~~~
\I \ , \~~?s
"'~\
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~::::/ y ~
Please Print Name: ~,~~,K "7 'J?;~hP/
Company:
Address: 7ttfflfl H Ju//a //pJ/
0. _ /
fa/! ,&,/ #'h/d'//tt'
/ -
Phone: 9t?f,,9RJ'J? f;f
, .
-
~~f
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ftECE\VEll
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9o-O:H~1 , 0 \993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
'\
Signature: ~'( ,
Please Print Name~
000248
Company:
Address: \.o~~ \ E \ (Y\ ~E.
&1(\ ~c: <l. v'\ Aeci\ c\(J.t (\
Phone:~ Re~.-OSOL.\
0002'79
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
'E.tE.\~tU
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.M~'{ \ \\ ~'!
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
is project will pro ide.
/
Signature:
/
!ki)
Please Print Name:
Company: /Yl;l: 7Jd~ ~p';:/ ')r (!A.(//c~
Address: 2/7 / /~es/- ,G/A/t?6//1) cSl/
.'1.&# ~/f"/J/;).r-d//1/0 ~. 9:2 /fcJu-'
Phone(7I'L) :? ??- /1 //
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ttEct\'4t\l
~~1 \ \\ \~3
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
I
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~EtE\"E\)
",~'i , \\ \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
flthiS projT will provide.
Signature: Cl,; lJ, W I {t:. -..
Please Print Name:_p tl-u ( G-- \ /\l~ Sr, (\)
)
)
Company:
Address: 5'-fG:- M ~v'V; fA D\~ I
"5,~,(V4' Qd.-4ID
Phone:_C7/lf) (~~J - 52-/'1
000278
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
IECE\'4Et)
~l'f \ n \993
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~cJJJ ~
Please Print Name: 1A",,(.l1J ~1t-1(/0
Company: (;,1' ~7 ~~A4V?1
Address: Ll1 > I< {> x' ~ ,0
R;q f-b GCf q1j7b
Phone: <( O~! (
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~EtE\'4En
~~'i \ \\ \~~?,
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Befhardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
S_ ~ cJ~J) D/)--;(or
Please Print Name: , 1 <:) /1 /? (') I? J;:: 1;-,.-<1
Company:
Address:
q 51'
Phone:
tr 'I qq c(J
000285
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~E.CE.\~E.t)
~ft." , G \99~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: C~ /t, /1 <!'ri ..I./yt/
Please Print Name: r~( )~~ ~ '"'Ri1--oW N
.
ComP1IDY: Gqo0r'1l 1)'.\\ \+,~.u~\\'. .::-_"
Address: j D ,,--\ W. 81 ~ \ ~ ~_.J.- "- \-
Sa,-' ~lS1l-"\n't-J.;t.I.... r r>. ~L}'-\CJ\
.
Phone: (~LJcZ) ~P>S - b ~ \ +-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
,ttE,~tn
\ \\ \~3
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01""'(
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: /3t)1)J )/( t7 7/ /{IJ1 t
Please Print Name:('I'JJ\/AI/~ I9bP, /
Company:
Address:, C)/32 \~/I' c31R.
c ~)/:&iN() {ht j1 9Jl!()j-
,
Phone: rrJ~ ~ SClgrc ?1, ~ } - "2, t{ \(
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ttEtE\,,~l}
1( \ ~ '8l!~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O-O't:~
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: 7!{67~ ?a-.~~
Please Print Name: f/) !!+/f 1/ce Of A !-Scf7/(
Company:
Address: /0)/..:27#"'- #vu "t"..,..1.-C~ ~
~ 9::,~~ c.?<--/-v//I
/
000275 Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01. MAY 1 0 1893
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:X ~-;? '~-rA~:--
Please Print Name: I. /!5A/E r-L/c;ATE"
Company:
Address::i d'.57~ ~qAlA/ /3/d6S.L..t!t?.d
6AIf/.t30/f//J f".d7~ 'Yr-::<*5
Phone:;<. R~ 7,.qO""1--?
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVEO
MA~ \ tl \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Company:
Address:
dO /0 AI r/!) Qrckrd~
5 Cl h 13.1 l' 1\ a {dn~"7
909- cf!o_3og~
Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
ftECEWEO
"'~.. \ \\ \991
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~9' Mr~ IZz..-
Please Print Name: {j),p iJ {II I S I f1 (VI P t, y
Company:
Address:
;;;-S- /D ;I, r6x.J r rI:p P? Cu
~a h ,8~rnatJ.t ~
9() 9~ F70 /)0;13
(!!J 9d<;/~
Phone:
I'
.,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
<,
ftECE,"EO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90_~ , ,,-
I
S /iN P-c 1(0/. . (I 4, 9 ::2-)/0]:>
"
Phone: (40'1) '2:8? - 77q ~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECE\VED
M~'( , 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~~ ~_.? g~"
Please P~~ ame: :se n- y ~ f(, E" /J IA J N S r,
Company:
,
.
Address: 9ft. 3CfN~ I hr
:') Itrv ,I{ pJ" N r f J). , 9.;;..~ J'
/
Phone: l'1cJ9J "':2? Jr - ')~
JOBS FOR SAN .BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
"
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O-OMA'f 1 0 1993
.'
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~his ~roj~~ will provide. ' .
S~,",,, Jl;~/. ..~. tfj, ~ .
Please Print Name: ;;1::11. (2P/)~ ,t. A14.,e-/v
Company:
Address: /:?(J5 AI ,C'~YCEj ~-I
,,~~/lJ /J/~1o (l;z Cj'~YJJ
.J
Phone: (!?:7f 6~;?
)
)
"
000:282
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
\\ttE\'1t\)
\ \\ \~~'!
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-0~~'(
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: JZ::./Y7h~ dol' ?/-t''/~/1>''-
Please Print Name: r;. -f'. ne,../ /_ ~ -e If-/) /tnap
Company:
)
)
Address: Ih/J w ~,'AL'f-~ All #8
.)"", t1 f3 er /lanD""., C.t/.. q~
Phone: ? 8" f? "19 () I
000283
-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ~f.tf.\'4f.\)
t\~~ , \\ ~93
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Si,,,4j7f5. 0/.-5,,/'
Please Print Name: C {v/ (j. In OSh-p
Company:
)
)
Address:
Phone: fb <7
,
<(~-6 7/1
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~tct'''t\')
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.~~'i , \\ \99~
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
. JI"'"!.a~. d
SIgnature: ~<.. At -/; L<
Please Print Name:--'ltM i ( ,. f/ J!) lAC' I 0. y,:: J/
Company:
Address: 7~ ~ ~. Dlli II!' .4 CE.
~~ Y-1f.I1~Jil1(}J r fJ
Phone: ~9:.S5-~ 3 5~
)
j
00(\2 4 ~i
"""",,,,,,,,;0;0"""',;
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ftECEWEl)
. M~'( \ \\ \99~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~G ,\'\ 'f\Ct{) ~l_ L 1.-
Please Print Name:1i}\ 'A I)()D 1\ KA lli
Company: L '7- \ ~\ ~ ~
Address: \ \.0 ') S. ~'\ \ ~8YDn
v
,SAn &\Lnc'(:\,neJ (l (1\1\'
Phone: ~DG\ - ~~'\ - 'IL\D2
)
)
000240
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O-O~AY 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will p,vide.
s;goawret}.- ./ 4~
Please Print Name: $141']1']6 i. Good ),M.. )
Company: If'}I ZION Mls5/0/}{J,e( Bl'Jpf,sf-- C ~4f2ch )
Address: db4.3 W. LOn1t1t..- '161-19 D~,
Ifj ;, IflJ " t tv &J.:J3'7 ~
Phone: G(Jq) .35'5- /.;z:!:>~D
000239
000286
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~ECE'VED
M~Y 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~O<\ ~ 9 w-.J)~
Please Print Name: S"" 'S ~ p i-I ~. W ~ , <;' 11-
Company:
Address:---tt; ~ I G.lGeA 00 c:;:~
S~N ~Q.lV~1? D;",... (""l. q~4 ~\
I
Phone: ~'if I..{-<) <;,3 ,
000238
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90J1~Y 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:l~ +,~
Please Print Name: ,k,' rf/ b~ r / '1 t'\ ~ r.5 6 ~
Company:
Address: ~ ~ 1.../ () WI [r/'....-rvS I 5+.
_ <)0.... n B rd ,Co-.. 1 :Lf./- U
Phone: 71ft;) 3<1511 ~lr
.~
)
.,.
000241
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-OMAy 1 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
S;gMWre' ;Lod l;;~
~ /
Please Print Name: ~ G. , 1 ~ -:\I 66) E# S
Company: M-t, 2)'o(\-~:o~P~\S\- ChUi=0-l\
- ~ vd~ ~
Address: . /+-~ . ~ -~'. z:s:-
2 17 I W. LJ-M'() /,'-./ AvE,
Phone: ('1CJ 9) jT:' :::f LJ ~?7- J~ 1/
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO t\l
,ttt\'4
. \~~~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01l'''''
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
:::9:J:.n~t:oL
Company: IJa-hlJhd fldU(1jq--j/Ofl ~+vtt--'
Address: L./~J g /~~rV/l--dLl/1-y ~.It '€-
,Still &/11 WilJ~ (!A- q -<- '/0 <if
Phone: (9(Yj) 9 r <!-l -51,{ /P
)
)
000244
00024S
""",,".
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~ttt\~tn
ft.'i \ \\ \99~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-\t
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project wilJ provide.
Signature:~fJ~J~' . k..,,~
Please Print Name: F.,. he. t'a- SUrn /,i,Y;
Company: /! 01 In a-f (' rJlr1lf'O../U./ {)Irt r""~~
C/O )...("&r.... Br-f>..r':Y\O" I ass 0 (!I(J'
Address: I '3(n~ 7 II rea rA.-fJ c;+rff:f rOOWG ,( c-n q''),(JIW
, 'f""
Phone: tr\":5 S" ~ -gy ~f:Y 5
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ~ECE\VEO
t4~1 , n \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: 'E~\ ~\ wrti-J
Please Print Name: "6 ~ \ 0J) '(Y,() \l ~ n
o . \
Company: \.A~.\ fY\()..l ~~ (}1r\ Clffi \')().ru r
AddressL \(\c\ Q b [(2.,('\ (\,0 1\ A~~o~\~-t<<,
t~(.'X' Q.[C>J..lft1\ sl-wA. pltJC\\ ~..J\ C))..c4J.
)
)
00 fl2 j G Phone:
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
MA~ 1 I) 1993
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: A~k ~. ~
Please Print Name: AL~(\ 13. (h4t.JeY
Company:
000246
Address: J:~<A S" #\"f16Nt\ AVe.
Stl t-.\ [\e rNqrtti t.S6 (f>.. ~
Phone:&1) ~~7-.3J Sip
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
"tt\~t'G
. " ~,\\\~~~
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-O~~
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:CJtJ0~ $ru.rn1/ ~
(I H .
Please Print Name: ~ f, e, \~ L < <.; 1 ml / N
Company: '\ r-.\ l\
\ ~l'
Address:
(
l
-0~9' {
Phone: 1I ? ,I-tieL Cr
000251
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO \ltct\\jtn
"'~.. \ \\ 'e~?'
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:-bmt ~l
Please Print Name: Rnrr,,-, h .o.rl" 7 _
)
)
Company:
Address: ,9.5'7,"'} ^} f!-,f1rdIJ/Y) crt,
0f/r7 ,I5.L1nnrdVJ() t1J 9.:Jsitll
Phone: 901 }f'j '7:J7LJ1
0.00347
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDIN<\tct\~t\)
"ft.'( \ \\ \~9~
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: ~d/~
Please Print Name' Elijah S Singletary ~
'- 2659 Ma,.atie Ave
Sn Bemrdno, CA 92405
Company:
Address:
Phone: Pc? 7- /...? .2. 0
OOfl350
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO 1tECEWED
M"" 1 0 \993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: [7 /;;r/~~?;r; ~/M,if
Please Print Name: (';0,.dY:u. f/ hk/SA4
Company: /& 77 Ift.!dI- t/~ U
Address: ~ ~, ttz f,;2~/1
Phone: (1#) cfyg~ 7t3~ p, cfg7-7/~
.",.~",.'Ci.','"
000247
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
~ttt\~tt)
YES, I support the CalMat C1tion Creek Project Specific Plan _.\ \\ \~~3
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: h7 CYVk .rilL#~
Please Print Name: /Y) It J:. If' 1/ v' D <;,,,,,,j
.
Company:
Address:~7.t W,,.:;J 7~P
~~ 8~ ~e'r :f;251d--s
Phone: 9 /) 9 - Vi (J .;l 3 0 f
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO \\tct\~t\)
,,~'t \ \\ ,~~?,
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
'"
Signature:
Please Print Name:
Company:
Address::B1Pl7 rJ/Y) ~vdl0
fl. 6. to otaHlD
Phone:blli) ~?J5 '114h)
RECEIVED
MAY f 0 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaJMat Cl\iOD Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name:j)cJ'N.O.-1"I ~Oi.
company:_t6cy I~ ~e...ctlaSTI'\T-f
Address: 3'J ~O \0 E s-m.&I:2T s g c."1i
000472
Phone: ~9,\-O I. vJ.-\
Rtce
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO HAY 1 ,''It..,
1993
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
000528
Name: r;(mV L ~ ~
company:0~0"~~ .
Address: ~~.s- ~~
~/ a-^ 92~tf~
Phone: f'tt ~ --1/ .i" tJ () .
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
Htc~JVeo
~41'
1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat ClVon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this proj t will provide.
Address:
,
Name:
000543
&;
<<Q7J
000529
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs thejobs, the revenues and the business that
~roject will provide.~
Name: ~6-,
Com..." of" <7i.o ~"'" ;Jf-u> ~ i
A""'= 3 50S C' 7/ ~
c5~-~ 1~,:s (iJ
Phone: ?h'::J- 4': ') () 0
HEC~
Jf41' I~to
1 Q 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name~~.J.. ~\JM~
Company: '-Ci\ ~ '-- ~En. ~~~l\ \..(
Address: d\o'"?\~ l~~(:).\)(. Q.\.\~
~\G~'--\-\Nd G"" C\-a:?A~
000536 Phone: ~(od aC\8\
RtCtll/f':O
MAY'
I 0 1993
000539
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaJMat Qyon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: PAu L ::J~"AJ
I
,
Company: La j( t .4D tT/2... ;Q[ II lr 7' 'l
Address: 3 :{""' 0)...... tf . ;/;1111. A /lJj)
/r:h Gi/LI}IVO 'c/t923YC,
I
Phone: rft 1- Y JO 0
Rtc~
t;.'VtlJ
ftf4r 1 0
1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
IItCt,,,
. ~4r to
, o 199J.'
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: JA/V' (k.E4/J!<. y
Company: iN5 ihP67Z ry.-11 J- ry
Address: 0So5 j::. IIi G 1-I,{/1/V;
/I; G /-I A /l /t/~ J ~ ?;l3~ J-
Phone: j?~~ -1/~,t)O
000479
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the Ca1Mat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~I 14 r-D -de-y-tJ/) rh
Company: ~/S" /A/Jve-y ~fi /1(
Address: 3S-o,~ E ~fl ~;v^ Ilt/T'
#jJ/AN/) t?~. 9;2 5 YL
Phone: R" 6" ;) - ~~ 0 ()
.000531
RECEIVED
HAY f 0 1993
000539
,.;,
;.
~tCtlVtD
HAY fU.'
. 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide. ;j
Name: ~ ~ ~d1l~
I
I
Company: Lo H t ,~U e/'2.... IZlIJ lr 7' </
Address: 3)''''0),.-' cf. ;/;1/1'- ttiUiJ
/rl GIIL!}/V'O 'c1t923Y("
. I
Phone: rf{, 1- Y.JD.o
0005~8
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RtcEIVEQ
HAr 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: .7(!zAnv ~ /lvt -' A_.<:Jj /l )
Please Print Name: /III:r O/i?1 __ /l /? dp ~.s ON
Company: Alr.';j/:.6c;"e../uyod ~,4I/zJ,.ec;
Address:, :? /? I ic), JT iJ!3- C b P 1!2-f
_~/) A/?Rj;jl-Ie.dpzc;. ;';/1 f;;Lf'o7
Phone: ~V /t"&~ c:J71/
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO flEC!IVto
HAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature: dO &V c[)~
000596
Please Print Name: . 7)/)~,J r? '" /? 1/) <s Ie ('
Company: IIlCtc:1 Jzj4~k,:7a:' ~/? 1?f.-e5'
U ..u. .
Address: dOl kh .JjiJ.!.-!:1- S-k~~:!f.
~A/1 L!J~~/ll1dr/2c1, a ~7
I
Phone: 6cr) 9Ft,. -07 (I
.
000576
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY 1 0 f993
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
k. thi. projoct wi'E
Signature/Jdh./-o/4 . ~~u~/i
Please Print Name: /Pl F? /2/1 y /V A.R. Ofr>1 It? H
(
Company: lVer q L.bOk A/Jod J21"?/l /h~ s
U f-I. -
Address: 3? / to - /( I.Y U'1. ,<)'I-~ PI"? r
Yb1 A'-(" ~ n 4~lU" C/I- c?,;L '( 0/
Phone: fIJ9 fA f (; -07! /
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
oon5~9
Signature: ~ C./J --1 ( '-'(7
v
Please Print Name: )( ~ N' C/?/2 1-1 ~ I- ~
Company: .AI~0'lihd..eJJMd jf;:7/?-IIo--es
Address: 1..1'01 i'd. -Y/J t3. 0Pee't"! f-
,<)An A&ote/2 n..eclt/l~. C#. 1'2/-/07
Phone: (fo~) ff'tb -07//
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
R~Ctl"to
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 9O-01~AY , 0 1993
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:~ ~ ~JJL/
Please Print Name: S/f/1'J'1 /4- dc//? cI
Company: ft~ ( CI j, iCJ~h iJrJrJ AJ!'?;tf/,0,.,e 5
V #L
Address: ... ?c;l 1/), /;/;J ~ S -1,,(' t? e (-
-SA/! sl5p?~'jJ /-l,ed//?/.J r./J <f'24"~7
I
Phone: (ftJr) Pg'&-cJ7((
000600
-
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~is project will pfoVide~ _ )
Signature: ~~,;..M/ /L../
Please Print Name: u/!~ )/-6'/I.<)O/z
V
Company: AI;?' (J J, J~-€ J)/J/Jd ~~-1/~~ <;
Address: <-?o! tV, Jf u th ,-'5~e',.qr
000597 5/h1 Nb1/lRd/l~~ 6# 9':J-tfc:J7
Phone: :#(1~1) ,0 r ~- -,:77//
RECEIVED
HAY 1 0 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
HAY , 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
. -~~~
Slgnature:~ _
Please Print Name: ~ )"{:.. +.\ n ~ + A J.() "
Company: (\",VlL{'"y <9 I Sh~J )0rlse
Address: d.~1 () F #/7 h / 1JY.)r./
Son 'Be rGVJa..rd i'f)!) (1
Phone: ??0J/~.3q 713
000569
000503
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: a.:
Company: 0
Address: 1 () b 6 r t..JJJAS.h, n ~
C nP J.,m.l Cr~. ~
Phone: ~dS -~O 0
RECEIVED
HAY , 0 1993
~_.,.~,
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO Rf!'
I;CEIVED
HAY , 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
. this proj~t will pro~ , .
Name: ;;., P;;.; ~.. ~.
Company: /~ W ~
:::l7L:t:~ ~
Phone: 3M - ,7\,9 f}
000523
-
000524
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name:? 0 J q~ (( 6' ~I 'elf r-..
o .
Company: C' - ;;. / ,if c ~'o r1/ Re &1./ /Y
v
Address: .;zS,I () ff. A~~
~ /3R~~
/
Phone: )1% 'Z - 7S 9 q
. RECEIVE
H 0
AY t 0 1993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAY f 01993
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ,7tJ g /I ~ -hJ ,#
Company: C -e ,l/ ~?-/ /fe-11ft? /of
Address: C3 bet'! c: /!,ph (4?1/ J/v .# 3d
/Il!/;~ C#. q2--1'V~
Phone:{f~~) %/ r 2/;2-/
nr'\"~'~
. '..'
lttCtfVEO
HAY 1 0 f993
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
=y,~~f:~~ ~:::;::J::uvdo(JrYUff
e.
Phone: ?j 00 2' 9& is
000515
IJIC->"'.c.,..,
~~c
,4(4/, t'IVt
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO f (J 1.9$; tJ
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000518
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~Ti2.;e..k.. SAUUIE.\2.
Company: L6NTUi2(' - 2/ fie/I'oN
Address: 3bl1t+ ~. f./-/Gf-/utr-JJ\, A V,F,
H/(;;/luq,ut:, ~A ~23C/~
Phone:j~O"') gC,,4 -2/2/ .
000508
~~c~
,4f4Jf I ~ C IJ
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO 10199.1
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~~ \.A.....,~'-^' K0(;(.d) ~ +-~
Company: c..~~V<...1 _ -:::t.. ~-+--<vj
Address: ~ lo ~ 'f. b-\--" < ~ '^ \ ~ ~ 0-'-' <7
W L.-" ~ L-. L <Q ..J) 6.---
Phone: 8CoLf- d.-\ d- L.
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ~~~~I
"'4/, V ~ ()
I ol.9$J
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: I~'II ~~f-
Company: fA? /1 ~U7 :A / d cheP/1-
Address: ~1OC?y .tE. 48 h (o?td ~('-'.
Ih-'g '/<1/14:> C,4 c;? A '3lj~
Phone: 1(71- g;{; 1/-- ;Z r ;;..,/
000512
000507
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaJMat C;uon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: """RON PL U 4--1
Company: ~6JJrU/2 V -< / 4c-)/t1".v
Address: /C9'/l/ ///,?6c:/k sf.
~F/r/>>A/AC". c!gC /rf} r.2 ss7/'
-
Phone: 90.7'- 7:7 y~r/.Fl)
,,~c
~4r 1 elite/)
Q 199J
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaIMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000509
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~'{I-6IJa -;A/aAA/
Company: C?:>Juf _ 2-/ fJe/~/oAJ
Address: 3t; 9t/ ~. McY.///-M//j /7v'~
#~//7-J/VO
Phone: 0 :;/- ~02j 2-/
If. RECElveo
~r f 0
1$93
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: /1F J! f ( )Z,I R f' rr
Company: ~? .A.J+UI--,Y )/ .4(' flJ;U
Address: ,7~ 9 ~ E f-);c;t kJ AU c.
/.
j)/9J. /qAd ra.-/ 9,2J If'
I"
000506 Phone:?t? <( ;) I ;) I
;;CElveo
1 0 199J
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVEO
"'AY
1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Ca\jon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
\:'\ thifl'jiect will provide.
Name:~Ve_1iLr'f
Company: Hr<:UW1f'I-~C'atA -rfff
Addre,,, . V:? CCJ"j. 5+
8cw. grnQ tu~ C4 ?/JCftJ/
,
Phone: (Cf-b9J ?Z9~C8( I
000522
RECEIVED
HAY 1 a f
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ,993
YES, I support the CaJMat C~OD Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ~ ~ ,/ /~
Company: (!_1?/k ~;;2.- / C(.--, ~-
Address: J0~7" f! 'd~ ~
/JyL&-/ 11 7?? f'c..
000510 Phone: Fr'P CY -;l / -2 I A' /~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO *'fCEIVto
HAY t 0 '993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: j(VO~ t!l<oq}~
Company: eG7lJ ru e( ;J1 If t- rlD,{ )
Address: gc,,9L/;':; N'0f.ft-/lVD Auy- fo
f( (0 (fL--Iff.J D (!ft 9 rJ- 3 </ b
(
Phone: 96'1 / ~fo of - :J-I? (
I
000521
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO RecEIVE
H.4Y 0
I 0 1993
YES, I support the CaIMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name:-.fYle Lady &vtV \ ov...e ')
Company: L 0 '; s Lv.- 0L ( ;' Z-~ (-f y
,
Address: 3g) '> ~. t-I L I k( 0-4
ft\', k(c.-/ (j}. CJ)-) 'If-
Phone: C:ZOC) ~ Gd- '-( Wi)
000487
000471
",'~
RECEIVED
HAY 1 0
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
NamUOI-l-N '60 u ~
\ '
Company: 1S.:,LI~ .Qo" \~ '" \
\
Address: 3"2...\20 N. G S-+- ~Tc., '\3,.
S'PJ' ~["'~""T\ \'.,,,0 , CD.. q~<.to <.:;-
,
Phone: <={ 0<( ~ ~Y:; ( - c r ~I
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
"""'~""1..
RECEIVED
MAY 1 0 1993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000483
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
- ~
Name:
Company:
Address:
Phone:
~ 7></1'0
?t1 -r.J ~VV-
000485
RECEIVED
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDIN{f1AY I 01993
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-61.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
~ this P~Oj~t will provide.
Name: ~)~ ~
,
Company. t!. ~ t?c~7 ?( Sh1-.../~
(/ ....
Address: )- cr/ tJ t' ~ ef # (' 2./
Phone:
f& r:- 37';:;---a
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CalMat Cl\,jon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000484
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: /J~ ~
Company: .8 U "Y-r ~
. t7
Address: ~~tL. <I-- ~)
~ 1l/110
Phone: ~Y~-70c.//
/Ieee
}f4y 11I~/}
, 0 f99J
000467
-ii
,,~c
!14Y 1 ~/"t(J
o 199J
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
YES, I support the CaJMat Cl\ion Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: flat! i f)// c U ')
Company: C~,/a/ 8/1A/ktr-e. 4v-;r,-",' ;;;'~1N""
Address: c-z"3 0 6. 49 ,{/.o~/
S4f\.l JJD~~NU4.I,;v'O
Phone:
8"'3 51 - 0 6.:2./
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
IEeE
ftf4r 1 l&tea
01993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000469
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: C~/":U~i4./J(l~
Company: ~J~~j d3JJ'~ ~~
Address: 22 ':?C:> E. 4lfL.1 c?.AU -
~~
Phone: R-ff? - cJtt d /
~'~:'
..~=~...- ""
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO ItECEIV~D
NAY 1 q
199,
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
Company:
Address: ;;;
~,~.
-
Phone: g?;7-tJfod-/
000482
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
!I::~t/Vto
Q 199J
YES, I support the CalMat C~on Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
-., I(Y~~
Company:COL-DW<:":LL ..DfiM<.8<- t)...."r'N GOC"'It~
Address: -;:).:130 ~ J.ilc;hl''''ld (1-v.
,<)' 0.., J) (\ .j.:>. (}.c:r..
000470
Phone: ( q",.,) ~ 8q 'o/Poi J
RECEIVED
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO HAY 1 01993
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
000468
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: :Ji ~!'i C::;vMLO
Company: B I V- 0 -rr f2--e S
Address: ~.y:/ 8- ~ (;{J JJl) A u'-L
~~ /LA q~'"3i.f:b
Phone: JrO I::' +-? g V
R!C!IV~O
MAY , 0 199
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO J
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Name: ....s;-D 67-~ee A./HI(//fL.Y
Company: L-(J(J;. ,l.At/~AL ,eel'1t-1 '/
/'
Address: '3 ::.-o.!>~ ;3. (-f(cPJlt-A/I.,IJ) "'lIe.
jI/?lf _/fVi), G/}, 9,)"f' </-/
,
000538
Phone: 3-c,;;;2- 4~-dO
JOBS FOR 'SAN BERNARDINO RECEIVED
MAV t , ..,
YES, I sUfltlOrt the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Ba'nardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the'business that
. . j)thiS project will ~. .
Signature: ~~
Please Print Name: 1-- f(OAJA-lZo{ p, ~A?so--.J
Cornpany: 1. ~ E Cno'-}.
Address: ~'(l..j':Jj ~lej0\J; ~ ftJ&
~ft~ ' 6 b tJ,O
Phone: ~4;. '7 - ct:; <{ 7
~
~~,",.-.c ,~
JOBS FOR SAN BERNARDINO
RECEIVED
HAY 0 6 ..
YES, I support the CalMat Cajon Creek Project Specific Plan 90-01.
San Bernardino needs the jobs, the revenues and the business that
this project will provide.
Signature:
Please Print Name:
COi'lpany:
Adtlress:
Phone: