Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-Development Services .. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: August 8, 2002 Of.:~,;::AL Subject: Authorization to establish a 4- Way Stop at the intersection of Marshall Boulevard and Miramonte Drive and a 3- way Stop at the "T" intersection of Marshall Boulevard and Muscupiabe Drive. From: James Funk, Director Dept: Development Services File: 13.1Rl MCC Date: September 9,2002 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None Recommended Motion: Adopt Resolution. ~amf:~ Contact person: Anwar Wagdy, Traffic Engineer Phone: 1211 Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Map, Reso., Warrants, Ward: 1 Petition FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $ 1,000.00 Source: (Acct. Nos.) 001-187-5111 Acct. Description: Signing & StriDinl! Materials Finance: Council Notes: ~ ~2..a:J2-2~ Agenda Item No. I J. q!q/02- .. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subiect: Authorization to establish a 4-Way Stop at the intersection of Marshall Boulevard and Miramonte Drive and a 3-Way Stop at the "T" intersection of Marshall Boulevard and Muscupiabe Drive. Backeround: Engineering Staff received a request, through a petition, from the Blair Park Neighborhood Cluster Group to install a 4-way stop at the intersection of Miramonte Drive and Marshall Boulevard and a 3-way stop at the "T" intersection of Marshall Boulevard and Muscupiabe Drive. The neighborhood group feels that installation of the requested stop signs will improve traffic safety in their neighborhood. Staff evaluated the requests in accordance with City's Administrative Policy for Stop Sign Iustallation. Marshall Boulevard, Miramonte Drive and Muscupiabe Drive are all classified as local residential streets in the City's General Plan. Pursuant to the evaluation, staff has determined that both of these intersections meet Warrant "B" of the Administrative Policy (see attachment). This warrant is satisfied when sixty (60) percent of the residents located within six-hundred (600) feet of the proposed stop sign, sign a petition agreeing to its installation, and two other criteria are met. At the intersection of Marshall Boulevard and Muscupiabe Drive, criteria B-7 and B-9 are met. Part B-7 is met when during any two hours of an eight-hour period, 125 vehicles cross the major street while 200 vehicles enter the intersection from all directions. This part of the warrant is met during the hours between 3:00 p.m. through 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. through 6:00 p.m. Part B-9 is met when one approach to the intersection is a driveway serving a residential property. The intersection of Marshall Boulevard and Miramonte Drive meets criteria B-2 and B-7. Criteria B-2 is met when streets leading to the intersection do not intersect at right angles. In this case the north leg of the intersection does not meet the intersection at a right angle. Part B-7, as described above, is met during the four consecutive hours between 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Since both of these intersections meet Warrant "B" of the Administrative Policy for Installation of Stop Signs, staff recommends the installation of multi-way stop signs at Marshall Boulevard's intersections with Miramonte Drive and Muscupiabe Drive. Financial Imoact: The estimated cost of $1,000.00 for installing the new stop signs will come from Account No. 001-187-5111 (Signing and Striping Materials) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. '. Marshall Boulevard at Muscupiabe Drive and Miramonte Drive Authorization to Establish multi-Way Stop Signs b Location of Proposed Multi-Way Stop Signs 576 '~j ~: ~'i !! "......;].':~--~'t .~~ I '"~";~t__ ..~~v ,.,\ :;z' rs .. . 21Sf ,,~~.~1!.,/ v $;., .....~G~~\};:I '--i":'\'~::~I_.,_.,. ~i. ,,~J v EllGEMONl i.... '.of'" v t;;i tii """""""""'"\-"'- Zi V .-.. 6~&-{.'.. . ~f/~r' ~ C\ v ......J...... .....: i -4--::'~._. ~(;,'; i j( I, e: \ ~!~;, ..J...~~_~"._--i-:2___ , fiOn! , !it a .u.i- iw B1.6SE'1 i, f. ...."....."...,......... II ....\; ___n_'__________; v i'r "j. ". I;., ., ST___ ~: W,' % Z! ~':)i\ 'V +---- I~ 'I~ _v_____,L~~~ ; ..l! ~.+~!'!--- ~, _ !"''' -',e li;; t; r'~l,i:i ~. i ','.;,";,..1 f---,_IL,~~"..,L~i '_:Ii I , 51 ~l -=Tt;'--'~;)i)' .....,'c',25r ~(,-,,\ ~t.~.~,t~._:_i , I 23RD ~j .,00_00_-..------1 o . _..n__m_..' , "w' -COURTl~:.._,-:::l....~.,. .h_2_11I~f';1-l 51 ._f 'V OR , ".'-f1)iI: .., -=i..~!.~_____~L 'I - ~,I __. 51 [~ '" ,It........-. l~~. 5T '/0(10 o .51 lEi ~ '. v S1';e;) f~'-~'w.I:... AI. 1;;1 'hii-'--1 v. 21~T 201H ~19\l9~asBros-Map~, City of San Bernardino WARRANTS FOR STOP SIGN INSTALLATION Location Existing Control Prepared by/Date A/;"'.>/':v/ -6/ [,,'/.; -,'fl', ,<>).;'" .? -v//l" i';J~" /N'/.::;:..-:, 79- ,// Checked by/Date POLICY Stop sign may be warranted at an intersection where any of the following warrants A.1. A.2. B or C are met A.1 STATE WARRANTS FOR MUlTI.WAY STOP CONTROL Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met REQUIREMENTS / REMARKS Traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, m~y stop need to be installed as interim measure until sign~Jj61nstalled Five or more right angle and/or turning ,!!JOVement accidents in recent 12 months j // All 3 Combined vehicle volur9 1P~ streets during any 8 hours conditions averages 500+ veh/hr i v/' listed to Combinedvehiyle an~!pe-destrian volume on minor street during the the right same 8 h9urs;a~~ges 200+ uniVhr, . A 1.3 must be And t' U'// met to Delay t / Imhor street vehicles during the maximum hour of the same satisfy 8 hO!Jf averages 30 seclhr warrant [)5fh percentile approach speed exceeds 40 mph (64 km/h), min, A-1 ,3./ vehicular volume warrant is 70% of the above requirements A.1: IS STA TE WARRANT FOR MUL TI-WA Y STOP CONTROL SA TlSFIED? A.2 STATE WARRANTS FOR TWO/ONE.WAY STOP CONTROL Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met .../ REQUiREMENTS /,,/REMARKS On the less important road at its intersectipn with a m~tf where accident history justifies the placeme~t r:/ ~top ~, ~n a county road or city str;1 Wi~tyi~Jntersection with a Stare hlghr'ay, /,} i t:l., At the intersection with rn~J 't\ighways, The highway traffic to be stopped depends on#lEIpproach speeds, volumes and turning movements, /' On a slre,e~efJtering a legally established through highway or street on. a I*ihOf street where the safe approach speed is less than 10 mph~16 km/h), At an un-signalized intersection in a signalized area, At intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view and accident records indicates a need for control by the Stop sign, A.2: IS STATE WARRANT FOR TWO/ONf-WA Y STOP CONTROL SA T1SFIED? CRITERIA A-l.l A.L2 CRiTERIA A-2.1. A-2.2. A.2.3 A-2.4 A-2.5 A-2.6 A-2.7 y N y N B. PETITION WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS BY CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Use only at residential street intersections excluding arterials, collectors, local collectors, where ACT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street Warrant 8 is satisfied if 8 and any two of the criteria 8.1 through 8-12 are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS y N Is there a petition signed by more than 60% of property X B. ownerslresidents located within 600 feet of proposed stop sign; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET. B-1. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on "suggested route to school". B-2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles. I^ B-3. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of more than 5%. Where one or more of the approaches, requiring the stop sign(s), 8-4. does not meet the required minimum sight distance, due to permanent view obstruction or roadway geometry. B-5. Intersection is abutting a park, major shopping center or other high pedestrian use facility. B-6. Pedestrian volume greater than 480 unitslhr in any B hour period. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume crossing the major ~ B-7 street exceeds 125 units during at least two hours where at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from aI/ approaches during any B-hour period. B-B. One approach of the inlersection is a driveway serving a commercial area. B-9. One approach of the intersection is a driveway servicing a residential property. Pass through (non-local traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles per hour and exceeds 40"16 of the vehicle traffic B-10 during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m: on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with local traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood. 8-11 The vehicle volume entering the intersection from all approaches exceeds 600 units during any hour at an intersection. Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular conditions not listed B-12 above or contained in the criteria of the State of California for the instal/ation of stop signs exist at the intersection (as determined/verified by the City's licensed Traffic Engineer. 8: IS 8 PLUS ANY TWO OF THE CRITERIA 8-1 THROUGH 8-12 SATISFIED? C. ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS BY CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Use Only at Residential Street Intersections Where ADT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street Warrant C is satisfied if C and any two conditions C.1 through C.10 are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N Three or more accidents in a 12 month period susceptible to correction C. by stop signs; or at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches during any consecutive 8 hour period; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET. C.t. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on "suggested route to school". C.2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angtes. C.]. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of more than 5%. Where one or more of the approaches, requiring the stop sign(s), does not C.4. meet the required minimum sight distance, due to permanent view obstruction or roadway geometry. C.5. Intersection is abutting a park, major shopping center or other high pedestrian use facility. C-6. Pedestrian volume is greater than 480 unit/hr in the B-hour period. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume crossing the major street C.T. exceeds t25 units during at least two hours where at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches during any B-hour period, C-B. One approach of the intersection is a driveway serving a commercial area. C.9. One approach of the intersection is a driveway servicing a residential property. Pass through (non-local traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles per hour and 40"Ai of the vehicle traffic during the hours from 7:00 C-tO. a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with local traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood. C-tt The vehicle volume entering the intersection from all approaches exceeds 600 units during any hour at an intersection. Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular conditions no! Hsted above or C-t2 contained in the criteria of the State of CaHfomia for the installation of stop signs exist at the intersection (as determined/verified by the City's Hcensed Traffic Engineer. C: IS C PLUS ANY TWO CRITERIA C.1 THROUGH C.12 SATISFIED? DID THIS LOCATION MEET ANY OF THE WARRANTS A.1, A.2, B OR C ABOVE? IF YES, CHECK WARRANTS MET D D [X] D A.1 A.2 B C IF ANY OF THE WARRANTS ARE MET, A STOP SIGN SHOULD BE INSTALLED AFTER APPROVAL BY MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND THE INTERSETION IS DESIGNATED A "STOP INTERSECTION" BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL. Good traffic engineering judgment must be exercised before installing stop signs at certain intersections (whether it meets the warrants or notf 1 Location Existing Control Prepared by/Date Checked bylDate '.. ,/j;;') / ///~../;--j,,~ / -,.:"",</;79'" f"'7. ~~. 7./;;/ . --:-'l' / POLICY Stop sign may be warranted at an intersection where any of the following warrants A.1, A.2, B or C are met A.1 STATE WARRANTS FOR MULTI.WAY STOP CONTROL Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N A-1.1 Traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, multi-way stop ,,' ' need to be installed as interim measure until signal is installed / A-1.2 Five or more right angle and/or turning movement accidents in recent 12 months J .- All 3 Combined vehicle volume on bo~syt~dUring any 8 hours conditions averages 500+ vehlhr/i. ,- listed to Combined vehicle and,Pe~slrian volume on minor street during the the right same 8 hours avZgef,;ido+ uniUhr, A1.3 must be And ,',. met to Delay to minors 'et vehicles during the maximum hour of the same satisfy 8 hours averages 30 seclhr .- warrant 8~percentile approach speed exceeds 40 mph (64 kmlh), min. A-1.3 vehicular volume warrant is 70% of the above requirements , A.1: IS STA fE WARRANT FOR MUL TI.WA Y STOP CONTROL SA TlSFIED? A.2 STATE WARRANTS FOR TWOIONE.WA Y STOP CONTROL Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met / CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS ~EMARKS Y N A-2.1. On the less important road at its intersection with a main roag.,wnere accident history justifies the placement of Stop signs,.// A-2.2. ~n a county road or city street, with ~ i~t.e.rseelJon with a Stare hlghyiay. / I . ;.' /' At the intersection with two m~,? .- ays. The highway traffic to be A-2.3 stopped depends on the approach speeds, volumes and turning movements. ; - ./' A.2.4 On a street ,;n,re!1ng a legally established through highway or street. A-2.5 On a minlf ~treet where the safe approach speed is less than 10 mph (16 ~mlh). A-2.6 At an un.signalized intersection in a signalized area. A-2.7 At intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view and accident records indicates a need for control by the Stop sign. A.2: IS STA TE WARRANT FOR TWO/ONE.WA Y STOP CONTROL SA TISFIED? City of San Bernardino WARRANTS FOR STOP SIGN INSTALLATION B. PETITION WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS BY CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Use only at residential street intersections excluding arterials, collectors, local collectors, where ACT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street Warrant B is satisfied if B and any two of the criteria B-1 through B.12 are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS y N Is there a petition signed by more than 60% of property >< B. owners/residents located within 600 feet of proposed stop sign; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET. B-1. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on "suggested route to school". B-2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles. B-3. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of more than 5%. Where one or more of the approaches, requiring the stop sign{s), B-4. does nol meet the required minimum sight distance, due to pennanent view obstruction or roadway geometry. B-5. Intersection is abutting a park, major shopping center or other high pedestrian use facility. B-6. Pedestrian votume greater than 480 units/hr in any B hour period. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume crossing the major f B-7 street exceeds 125 units during at least two hours where at leasl 200 vehicles enter the inlersection each hour from all approaches during any B-hour period. B-B. One approach of the inlersection is a driveway serving a commercial area. B-9. One approach of the intersection is a driveway servicing a 'b residential property. Pass through (non-local traffic) on the subject residential slreet exceeds 50 vehicles per hour and exceeds 40% of the vehicle traffIC B-10 during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m: on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with local traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood. B-11 The vehicle volume entering the intersection from aI/ approaches exceeds 600 units during any hour at an intersection. Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular conditions not listed B-12 above or contained in the criteria of the State of California for the instal/ation of stop signs exist at the intersection {as determined/verified by the City's licensed Traffic Engineer. B: IS B PLUS ANY TWO OF THE CRITERIA 8.1 THROUGH B.12 SATISFIED? ;< . C. ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS BY CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Use Only at Residential Street Intersections Where ADT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street Warrant C is satisfied if C and any two conditions C.1 through C.10 are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N Three or more accidents in a 12 month period susceptible to correction e. by stop signs; or at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches during any consecutive 8 hour period; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET. e.l. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on "suggested route to school". e.2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles. C-3. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of more than 5%. Where one or more of the approaches, requiring the stop sign(s), does not e.4. meet the required minimum sight distance, due to permanent view obstruction or roadway geometry. C.S. Intersection is abutting a park, major shopping center or other high pedestrian use facilily. C-6. Pedestrian volume is greater than 480 unit/hr in the B-hour period. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume crossing the major street C.7. exceeds 125 units during at least two hours where at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches during any 8-hour period. C.B. One approach of the intersection is a driveway serving a commercial area. C.g. One approach of the intersection is a driveway servicing a residential properly. Pass through (non-local traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles per hour and 40% of the vehicle traffic during the hours from 7:00 C.IO. a.m. to g:OO a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with local traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood. C.ll The vehicle volume entering the intersection from all approaches exceeds 600 units during any hour at an intersection. Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular conditions nollisted above or C-12 contained in the criteria of the State of Califomia for the installation of stop signs exist at the intersection (as determined/verified by the City's licensed Traffic Engineer. C: IS C PLUS ANY TWO CRITERIA C-1 THROUGH C-12 SATISFIED? DID THIS LOCATION MEET ANY OF THE WARRANTS A.1, A.2, B OR C ABOVE? IF YES, CHECK WARRANTS MET D D CKJ D A.l A.2 B C IF ANY OF THE WARRANTS ARE MET, A STOP SIGN SHOULD BE INSTALLED AFTER APPROVAL BY MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND THE INTERSETION IS DESIGNATED A .STOP INTERSECTION" BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL. Good traffic engineering judgment must be exercised before installing stop signs at certain intersections (whether it meets the warrants or notf I sign this petition to acknowledge the placing of a four way stop at the comers ofMiramonte & Marshall Ave. I live with-in the 600 ft. area from the purposed stop signs and I feel it would benifit the community as far as safty and speed reductions. <::'"C'!;\x...'J.'\ /~ ~ "LL,.~ .: ,', /' 2:];\.,; i \:~ -':~,j ',~ "... \ (,. ell" 3. \ 4. 5., 6. 7 -::?F ..~., 8 1, ..). . . 9. 10.. 11. \GfJ!({12. (' d i'" " "~ 13,,,.' .., "" ~ 'I Lt.j'!; "'tt . Print Names Address Phone I ~i,~. e I '"l . /')'Y . 'VI nL !rl iJ,.0W-., "p~L.. 'rl-tt(~ gf . f \...- !I.. ) .Son.... /F -" i/ ~ o^" ~ i' t '-h- ----<--r----.. II : ,.~ i: i ('. \~~('~r;,- .l-f -.... (.,L.:-__ ~ i' ~ -'- l.\" ..Ji,\~ Sr>\.if" We the under signed would like a three way stop sign placed at the comer of Marshall and Muscupiabe. TIte stop sign is needed for several reasons first to slow down traffic on Marshall. It will also help prevent vehicles from speeding around the smooth corner that goes down Muscupiabe. This will also make our street safer for our children. Name address phone number signature r (1'" "l'l - l. ~9<b #JlI>e iJ{'l,'e;.. !b;'l iP5</tL> /J',g"'n ~"'::">07? /I..,.H,f;:~;J ,tJJ'/~-n " ( ( r (\ ~ l. II il' '0'(\ ~ /!H-- Lf) 7 H .5 7 7J1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 C 27 c c 28 [; (Q'" ~,'~ \ rl L,' -,' '( ..l. lJ J RESOLU rlON NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 655 ENTITLED, IN PART, "A RESOLUTION... DESIGNATING CERTAIN STREETS, OR PORTIONS THEREOF AS THROUGH HIGHWAYS..." AND ESTABLISHING A FOUR WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARSHALL BOULEVARD AND MIRAMONTE DRIVE AND A THREE WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARSHALL BOULEVARD AND MUSCUPIABE DRIVE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Resolution No. 655, Section One is amended by amending Subsection (9.9) MARSHALL BOULEVARD to read as follows: "(9.9) MARSHALL BOULEVARD (A) From Little Mountain Drive to and including Parkside Drive, excepting for eastbound traffic at Ladera Road. (B) At its intersection with Miramonte Drive, (4-Way Stop). (C) At its intersection with Muscupiabe Drive, (3-Way Stop). (D) At its intersection with "G" Street. (4-Way Stop), (E) At its intersection with Mt. View Avenue, (4-Way Stop). (F) At its intersection with Parkside Drive, (3-Way Stop). (G) At its intersection with Bonnie Street. (H) At its intersection with Arden Avenue, (4- W ay Stop). (I) At its intersection with Belvedere Avenue. (1) At its intersection with Rockford Avenue. " II II q /1 /02- -ft= P - - I~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c c RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 655 TO ESTABLISH A FOUR- WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARSHALL BOULEVARD AND MIRAMONTE DRIVE AND A THREE-WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARSHALL BOULEVARD AND MUSCUPIABE DRIVE. SECTION 2: Resolution No. 655, which designates certain streets, or portions thereof, as through highways, Section One Subsection (10.2) MIRAMONTE DRIVE is amended to read as follows: "(10.2) MIRAMONTE DRIVE (A) From and including 24th Street to and including Marshall Boulevard. (B) At its intersection with Marshall Boulevard (4-Way Stop)." SECTION 3: Resolution No. 655, which designates certain streets, or portions thereof, as through highways, Section One Subsection (12) MUSCUPIABE DRIVE is amended to read as follows: " (12) MUSCUPIABE DRIVE (A) Between 23rd Street and Colima Road. (B) At its intersection with Marshall Boulevard (3-Way Stop)." /I /I q;qjOd-, :it: ld. . (,- -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c c RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 655 TO ESTABLISH A FOUR- WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARSHALL BOULEVARD AND MIRAMONTE DRIVE AND A THREE-WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARSHALL BOULEVARD AND MUSCUPIABE DRIVE. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the day of , 2002 by the following vote, to-wit: COUNCIL MEMBERS AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT ESTRADA LIEN MC GINNIS DERRY SUAREZ ANDERSON MC CAMMACK Rachel Clark, City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this ,2002. day of Judith Valles, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: James F. Penman City Attorney .f~ II " ** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - NOT A PUBLIC DOCUMENT ** RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM TRACKING FORM Meeting Date (Date Adopted): q -'=1-0'2.. Item # Vote: Ayes /-'1 Nays k)-. Change to motion to amend original documents: - 11- Resolution # '2m2-2~3 Abstain k>r Absent .e Reso. # On Attachments: -=- Contract term: - Note on Resolution of Attachment stored separately: --=- Direct City Clerk to (circle 1): PUBLISH, POST, RECORD W/COUNTY NulllVoid After: - By: - Date Sent to Mayor: Date of Mayor's Signature: q-II-O)... Ch)-()? Date of ClerklCDC Signature: '1-13 'Q~ Reso. Log Updated: ;/' Seal Impressed: ,./ o Memo/Letter Sent for Signature: 60 Day Reminder Letter Sent on 90 Day Reminder Letter Sent on 45th day: See Attached: See Attached: ee Attached: Date Returned: Request for Council Action & Staff Report Attached: Yes~ No By_ Updated Prior Resolutions (Other Than Below): Yes No -L- By_ Updated CITY Personnel Folders (6413, 6429, 6433,10584,10585,12634): Yes No ~ By_ Updated CDC Personnel Folders (5557): Yes No .". By_ Updated Traffic Folders (3985, 8234, 655, 92-389): Yes -L- No By 11')'1' Copies Distributed to: City Attorney ,/' Parks & Rec, Code Compliance Dev, Services ~ EDA Finance / MIS Police ,/ Public Services Water Others: i=1Io U17tS Notes: BEFORE FILING. REVIEW FORM TO ENSURE ANY NOTATIONS MADE HERE ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE YEARLY RESOLUTION CHRONOLOGICAL LOG FOR FUTURE REFERENCE (Contract Term, etc,) Ready to File: iYl:L-. Date: ~ (11 O?- Revised 01/12/01