HomeMy WebLinkAbout28A-Development Services ORIGINAL
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Valerie C. Ross, Director Subject: Findings of Fact for denial of
Dept: Development Services Development Permit 3 No. 06-14—A request
to construct a 3-story, 93-unit senior housing
Date: December 18, 2007 complex at the northwest corner of Medical
Center Drive and 16th Street in the CO,
Commercial Office land use district.
MCC Date: January 7, 2008
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
December 17, 2007: The Mayor and Common Council granted an appeal of the Planning
Commission approval of Development Permit 3 No. 06-14 and continued the item to adopt
findings of fact for denial of the Development Permit.
Recommended Motion:
That the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Findings of Fact for denial of Development Permit 3
No. 06-14.
Valerie C. Ross
Contact Person: Aron Liang Phone: 384-5057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: 6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
Source: (Acct No.)
Finance:
Council Notes: lee,//aus #�� �� i7 U
Agenda Item No.
/ 7 0 �
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Findings of Fact for denial of Development Permit 3 No. 06-14 —A request to
construct a 3-story, 93-unit senior housing complex at the northwest corner of
Medical Center Drive and 16th Street in the CO, Commercial Office land use
district.
BACKGROUND
At their meeting of December 17, 2007, after hearing from the appellant and other local
residents, as well as the applicant and applicant's representatives, the Mayor and Common
Council granted Appeal No. 07-04, an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of
Development Permit 3 No. 06-14. In so doing, the Mayor and Council denied the Development
Permit in concept. The item was continued to the next meeting, to allow staff to prepare Findings
of Fact to support the intended action of the Mayor and Council, based on the analysis expressed
during the appeal hearing. Section 19.44.060 of the Development Code states that all of the eight
required Findings of Fact must be made to approve a Development Permit. Based on the
discussion and comments of a majority of the Common Council at the appeal hearing, Findings
1, 3, and 8 cannot be made. Therefore, Development Permit No. 06-14 should be denied.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL
1) Is the proposed development permitted within the subject zoning district and does it
comply with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, including
prescribed site development standards and any/all applicable design guidelines?
Senior housing is permitted in the CO, Commercial Office land use district, at a
maximum density of 47 dwellings per acre. Although the proposed project conforms to
the maximum permitted density, it does not comply with the lot coverage standard of
50% building coverage. The approval recommendation of the staff and Planning
Commission relied on an interpretation of this Code requirement that is not accepted by
the Common Council. Structural coverage of the site, including the parking structure and
buildings as proposed would be 65%, which exceeds the 50% maximum standard
prescribed in the Development Code.
3) Is the proposed development harmonious and compatible with existing and future
developments within the land use district and general area, as well as the land uses
presently on the subject property?
The proposed development would not be harmonious and compatible with existing
development in the surrounding area. The massing of the building, including the podium-
style development above the parking deck and the 3-story architecture would not be
consistent with the character of existing low-density residential development in the area.
8) The location, size design and operating characteristics of the proposed development
would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of
the City.
The size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed development would be
detrimental to the public interest, safety and general welfare. The enclosed design of the
parking area would be an indefensible space, hazardous to public safety. The intensity of
development would generate excessive traffic at the proposed location, and the proposed
right-in, right-out access on 16`" Street would be inadequate for safe and convenient
public access. The proposed security and management plan is not adequate to compensate
for these design deficiencies, to ensure the safety of residents and the public.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Findings of Fact for denial of Development Permit
3 No. 06-14.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO-REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Valerie C. Ross,Director Subject: Appeal of the Planning Commission
Dept: Development Services approval of Development Permit 3 No. 06-14 to
construct a 3-story, 93-unit senior housing complex at
the northwest corner of Medical Center Drive and
16th Street in the CO, Commercial Office land use
district.
Date: November 26, 2007 MCC Date: December 17, 2007
Svnopsis of Previous Council Action:
None
Recommended Motion:
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning
Commission's approval of Development Permit 3 No. 06-14,based upon Findings of Fact contained in the
Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 3, 2007, subject to the Conditions of Approval, Standard
Requirements (Exhibit 2).
Alternative Motion:
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council grant Appeal No. 07-04 and
deny Development Permit No. 06-14 in concept and continue to the next meeting to allow Development
Services to bring revised Findings of Fact to the Council.
Valerie C. Ross
Contact person: Aron Liang, Senior Planner Phone: 384-5057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward(s): 6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount:N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Description)
Finance: n
Council Notes: 1-7/077
Agenda Item No. 9
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 3 NO. 06-14 (Appeal No. 07-04)
Owner: Applicant: Appellant:
Inland Desert Investment Ricky Torres Lola Lee
30700 E Sunset Drive S Global Premier Development 1578 W. Gilbert Street
Redlands, CA 92370 5 Park Plaza, Suite 980 San Bernardino, CA
909.794.0411 Irvine, CA 92614 909.889.4667
949.222.9119
BACKGROUND
Development Permit 3 No. 06-14 is a request to construct a 3-story, 93-unit senior housing
complex with a recreation building on approximately 2 acres of land located at the northwest
corner of Medical Center Drive and 16th Street in the CO, Commercial Office land use district.
At its meeting on July 17, 2007, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and
received public testimony on the subject matter.
Councilman Rikke Van Johnson spoke against the proposed project stating that the proposal did
not meet all of the requirements in the Development Code and that the proposed project would
increase traffic and that the Planning Commission should deny it. One of the Councilman's
concerns about Code compliance was the staffs interpretation of the lot coverage standard in the
Development Code. The project includes a garden built on a deck above the parking. Because
the deck provides usable open space, staff did not count that area as building coverage.
However, the deck is a structure, and the Code defines building coverage as the portion of the
property covered by a structure. There were seven other speakers voicing opposition to the
proposed project including Mr. Phillip Moreno, who spoke on behalf of the Northwest
Redevelopment Project Area Committee (PAC) stating that the members were concerned with
the lot size and recreation area. Mrs. Betty Dean Anderson also spoke and indicated that the
proposed project would not be compatible with the surrounding area. The speakers in opposition
generally commented on the size of the lot, the size of the building, the intensity of the use and
its incompatibility with other senior housing in the area. Speakers questioned the size of the
recreation facility, adequacy of the amenities and several said that the seniors would have a hard
time exiting a 3-story building in case of an emergency.
Mr. Randolph Riley, member of the Northwest PAC, spoke in favor of the proposed project
stating that the project plan had been submitted to Northwest PAC committee members at
previous meetings and the committee voted to approve the project. Mr. Riley stated that it was a
good project that is needed in the community.
Appeal No. 07-04
DP3 No. 06-14
Hearing Date:December 17, 2007
Page 2
Mr. Ricky Torres, applicant, and Mr. Ben Seeger with KTGY Group elaborated on the proposed
project and clarified the size of the building, architectural features, size of recreation facility,
amenities, and exiting requirements in case of an emergency. The applicant also agreed to
modify the project description with added amenities for the recreation facility, added security
cameras for the building, increased area for the recreation facility, and a revised on-site
maintenance schedule requested by the Planning Commission.
After considerable discussion, Commissioner Longville made a motion to deny the proposed
project. Commissioners Longville, Mulvihill and Rawls voted to deny the project and
Commissioners Coute, Dailey, Durr, Heasley, Munoz, and Sauerbrun voted against the motion.
Commissioner Hawkins was absent. The motion to deny Development Permit 3 No. 06-14 failed
by a 3-6 vote. Subsequent to the failed motion, Commissioner Coute made a motion to approve
the proposed project. Commissioners Coute, Dailey, Durr, Heasley, Munoz, and Sauerbrun
voted in favor of the motion and Commissioners Longville, Mulvihill and Rawls voted against
the motion. The Planning Commission voted by a majority of 6-3 to approve Development
Permit 3 No. 06-14.
On July 31, 2007, Mrs. Lola Lee filed an appeal to the Mayor and Common Council asking that
the Mayor and Common Council overturn the decision of the Planning Commission. The details
of the appeal are in Exhibit 3.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None. The appellant paid the filing fees for the appeal.
CONCLUSION
The Planning Commission approved Development Permit 3 No. 06-14 based on the Findings of
Facts contained in Section 19.44.060 of the Development Code, as addressed in the Planning
Commission Staff Report dated July 3, 2007.
RECOMMENDATION
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council uphold the Planning
Commission's approval of Development Permit 3 No. 06-14,based upon Findings of Fact
contained in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 3, 2007, subject to the Conditions
of Approval and Standard Requirements (Exhibit 2).
ALTERNATIVE MOTION:
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council grant Appeal No. 07-04 and
deny Development Permit No. 06-14 in concept and continue to the next meeting to allow
Development Services to bring revised Findings of Fact to the Council.
Appeal No. 07-04
DP3 No. 06-14
Hearing Date:December 17, 2007
Page 3
EXHIBITS:
1 Location Map
2 Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 3, 2007
3 Appeal Application Dated July 31, 2007
EXHBIT 1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: DP3 06-14
(AP 07-04)
PLANNING DIVISION
LOCATION MAP NORTH
LAND USE DISTRICTS HEARING DATE: 12,17,07
E —
r
P
1
= "Tt
LLL
I [L
I i
ae
5TH
ifn 6ernrdin . ?ft
EXHIBIT 2
SUMMARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION
CASE: Development Permit 3 No. 06-14
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: July 3, 2007 "
WARD: 6
OWNER: APPLICANT:
Inland Desert Investment Ricky Torres
30700 East Sunset Drive, S Global Premier Development
Redlands, CA, 92370 5 Park Plaza, Suite 980
909.794.0411 Irvine, Ca 92614
949.222.9119
REQUEST/LOCATION:
The applicant requests approval of a Development Permit 3 to construct a 3-story, 93-unit senior
housing complex with a recreation building on approximately 1.98 acres of land located at the northwest
corner of Medical Center Drive and 16`x' Street in the CO-1, Commercial Office land use district.
CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS:
None
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS:
❑ Not Applicable
■ Exempt, Section 15332, Infill Development
• No Significant Effects
• Potential Effects, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
• Approval
• Conditions
• Denial
• Continuance to:
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3, 2007
Page 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant requests approval of a Development Permit 3 under authority of Development Code Section
19.06.020, Table 06.01 (G)(7)to construct a 72,000 square foot, three-story, 93-unit senior citizen housing
complex w ith a recreation building on approximately 1.98 acres of land. The proposed project is located
at the northwest corner of Medical Center Drive and 16`h Street in the CO-1, Commercial Office land use
district(Attachment A).
The project site consists of two separate parcels and is approximately 1.98 acres. The proposal has been
designed as a 3-story building with podium parking on the ground level, 31 units on the first floor, 31
units on the second floor and 31 units on the third floor. All three floors contain similar layouts with
each floor providing a lounge, a laundry room and two lobby areas. The first floor provides podium
deck open space and access to the recreation building. The podium deck will be a landscaped terrace for
the seniors (Attachment B).
The proposed senior project offers four unit types with two options for a one-bedroom and two options
for a two-bedroom. The one-bedroom offers Plan IA with 538 sq.ft. and Plan 1B with 554 sq.ft. The
two-bedroom offers Plan 2A with 751 sq.ft. and Plan 2B with 795 sq.ft. Each unit has a living room,
kitchen, bedroom and bathroom and will be plumbed and wired for a washing machine and dryer.
The following are floor plan details and planned distribution:
Plan 1 A: 69 units
Plan 1 B: 12 units
Plan 2A: 9 units
Plan 213: 3 units
TOTAL: 93 units
First Floor: Plan I = 23 units Plan 1B =4 units Plan 2A= 3 units Plan 2B = 1 units
Second Floor: Plan 1 A = 23 units Plan 1 B =4 units Plan 2A= 3 units Plan 2B = 1 units
Third Floor: Plan 1 A =23 units Plan 1 B =4 units Plan 2A = 3 units Plan 2B = 1 units
TOTAL: 69 units 12 units 9 units 3 units
The proposal accommodates 165 parking stalls and the parking for the residents will be gated with
automated security sliding gates. In addition to access control, on-site security includes lighting,
cameras with a monitoring service, and other features outlined in the Security Plan (Attachment E). The
project proposes one main entrance to the site on 16`h Street and two gated emergency driveways on 16`h
Street and on Medical Center Drive. A 6-foot decorative block wall with pilasters will be constructed
along the westerly and northerly property boundaries. The proposed project will provide additional
senior housing opportunities for the City's growing senior population as well as additional senior
program activities on-site.
The structure will be wood-frame/stucco construction with concrete roof tile. The new building features
window treatments and other variations in structure styles, ranging from traditional architectural
columns to contemporary features with complementary finishes.
SUMMARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION
CASE: Development Permit 3 No. 06-14
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: July 3, 2007
WARD: 6
OWNER: APPLICANT:
Inland Desert Investment Ricky Torres
30700 East Sunset Drive, S Global Premier Development
Redlands, CA, 92370 5 Park Plaza, Suite 980
909.794.0411 Irvine, Ca 92614
949.222.9119
REQUEST/LOCATION:
The applicant requests approval of a Development Permit 3 to construct a 3-story, 93-unit senior
housing complex with a recreation building on approximately 1.98 acres of land located at the northwest
corner of Medical Center Drive and 16`h Street in the CO-1, Commercial Office land use district.
CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS:
None
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS:
❑ Not Applicable
■ Exempt, Section 15332, Infill Development
❑ No Significant Effects
❑ Potential Effects, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
• Approval
• Conditions
❑ Denial
11 Continuance to:
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3, 2007
Page 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant requests approval of a Development Permit 3 under authority of Development Code Section
19.06.020,Table 06.01 (G)(7) to construct a 72,000 square foot, three-story, 93-unit senior citizen housing
complex with a recreation building on approximately 1.98 acres of land. The proposed project is located
at the northwest corner of Medical Center Drive and 16`h Street in the CO-1, Commercial Office land use
district (Attachment A).
The project site consists of two separate parcels and is approximately 1.98 acres. The proposal has been
designed as a 3-story building with podium parking on the ground level, 31 units on the first floor, 31
units on the second floor and 31 units on the third floor. All three floors contain similar layouts with
each floor providing a lounge, a laundry room and two lobby areas. The first floor provides podium
deck open space and access to the recreation building. The podium deck will be a landscaped terrace for
the seniors (Attachment B).
The proposed senior project offers four unit types with two options for a one-bedroom and two options
for a two-bedroom. The one-bedroom offers Plan IA with 538 sq.ft. and Plan 1B with 554 sq.ft. The
two-bedroom offers Plan 2A with 751 sq.ft. and Plan 2B with 795 sq.ft. Each unit has a living room,
kitchen, bedroom and bathroom and will be plumbed and wired for a washing machine and dryer.
The following are floor plan details and planned distribution:
Plan 1 A: 69 units
Plan 1B: 12 units
Plan 2A: 9 units
Plan 2B: 3 units
TOTAL: 93 units
First Floor: Plan I =23 units Plan 1B = 4 units Plan 2A= 3 units Plan 2B = 1 units
Second Floor: Plan 1 A = 23 units Plan 1 B = 4 units Plan 2A= 3 units Plan 2B = 1 units
Third Floor: Plan lA=23 units Plan 1 B =4 units Plan 2A=3 units Plan 2B = 1 units
TOTAL: 69 units 12 units 9 units 3 units
The proposal accommodates 165 parking stalls and the parking for the residents will be gated with
automated security sliding gates. In addition to access control, on-site security includes lighting,
cameras with a monitoring service, and other features outlined in the Security Plan (Attachment E). The
project proposes one main entrance to the site on 16`h Street and two gated emergency driveways on 16`h
Street and on Medical Center Drive. A 6-foot decorative block wall with pilasters will be constructed
along the westerly and northerly property boundaries. The proposed project will provide additional
senior housing opportunities for the City's growing senior population as well as additional senior
program activities on-site.
The structure will be wood-frame/stucco construction with concrete roof tile. The new building features
window treatments and other variations in structure styles, ranging from traditional architectural
columns to contemporary features with complementary finishes.
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3, 2007
Page 3
I
SETTING/SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The project site is currently vacant and relatively flat. Surrounding the property to the west abutting the
site is a senior housing complex in the CO, Commercial Office land use district. To the north and south
and abutting the site are commercial uses in the CO district. To the east across Medical Center Drive is
a vacant lot in the CO district.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
The proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements
pursuant to Section 15332 of the State Guidelines, for in-fill development projects that can be
adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The site is disturbed and located in an
urbanized area. No significant impacts on environmental or natural resources are anticipated.
BACKGROUND
The Development/Environmental Review Committee (D/ERC) initially reviewed the proposal on
September 21, 2006. The proposal was continued twice to allow sufficient time for the applicant to
revise the plans to address on-site security, site circulation, street dedication, and other requirements
including architectural elevations. The applicant has redesigned the project to resolve concerns cited by
the D/ERC. On June 14, 2007, the D/ERC determined that the revised plan was adequate and moved
the project to the Planning Commission.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
1. Is the proposed development permitted within the subject zoning district and does it comply with
all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, including prescribed development/site
standards and any/all applicable design guidelines?
Pursuant to Development Code Section 19.06.030 (2)(S), senior housing project is a permitted
use in the CO, Commercial Office land use district, subject to approval of a Development Permit.
The proposed project complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code and
General Plan as noted in Table A:
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3, 2007
Page 4
TABLE A— Development Code/General Plan Conformance
CATEGORY PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN
CODE
Permitted Use Senior Citizen/Congregate Permitted subject to Consistent
Care Housing Development Permit
Height 52 feet maximum 52 feet maximum N/A
Setbacks
- Front 15 feet 15 feet N/A
- Side 10 feet 10 feet N/A
- Rear 10 feet 10 feet N/A
- Side Street 10 feet 10 feet N/A
Open space 39,000 square feet
- Total 45% 26,000 square feet N/A
30%
Lot Coverage 30%(*) o N/A
50/o
Parking
- Standard 107 spaces 108 spaces N/A
- Handicap 4 spaces 3 spaces
Density 47 du/ac 47 du/ac N/A
Unit Size
1 bedroom 538 - 554 sq. ft. 510 sq. ft. N/A
- 2 bedroom 751 - 795 sq. ft. 700 sq. ft.
(*) The project provides podium parking. Lot coverage including the deck structure is 65%,but the deck will
provide useable open space, effectively reducing coverage.
2. Is the proposed development consistent with the General Plan?
General Plan Policy 3.1.1 states: "Encourage the development of senior housing in all areas of
the city "
This proposal will provide accessible senior housing opportunities in the western portion of the
city. While housing costs have increased steadily in recent years, affordable housing for seniors
has diminished rapidly. The proposed project will provide additional senior housing
opportunities for the city's growing senior population as well as additional senior program
activities on-site.
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3, 2007
Page 5
3. Is the proposed development harmonious and compatible with existing and future developments
within the land use district and general area, as well as the land uses presently on the subject
property?
The proposed development will be harmonious and compatible with existing and future
developments within the land use district and general area. The scale of the proposed
development is similar to that of the existing development in this area. The project site is located
in the CO district that permits the development of senior housing. Since the proposal is
consistent with both the General Plan and Development Code, no land use conflict impacts will
result from the construction and operation of the proposed facility.
4. Is approval of the Development Permit for the proposed development in compliance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 19.20.030(6) of
the Development Code?
The proposed project is exempt from the CEQA requirements per §15332 for infill development
projects. All grading and constriction activities will be implemented and monitored in
accordance with Public Works standard requirements to ensure that the project would not cause
any substantial adverse construction impacts.
5. Will there be potential significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural
resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored?
As noted in Finding No. 4, this project complies with CEQA and Development Code
requirements. No significant impacts requiring mitigation are anticipated.
6. Is the subject site physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed?
The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being proposed. The
proposed project complies with Development Code/General Plan Conformance Standards as
defined in Table A and Development Code Section 19.04.030(2)(Q) Senior Citizen/Congregate
Care Housing Design Standards.
The project will not create significant noise, traffic, or other conditions or situations that may be
objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The project exceeds applicable
landscaping requirements. The Traffic Division has reviewed the proposal and has determined that
the main entrance is adequate to allow sufficient stacking, and additional vehicle trips resulting from
the proposed project will not cause any significant impact for this area. Therefore, a traffic study
was not required for the project.
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3. 2007
Page 6
7. Are there adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and
services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety?
All agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation and other public
services had the opportunity to review the proposal and none have indicated an inability to serve
the project. The proposal will not be detrimental to the public health and safety in that all
applicable Codes will apply to the construction of this project.
CONCLUSION
The proposal meets all necessary Findings of Fact for approval of Development Permit 3 No. 06-14.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Permit 3 No. 06-14 based upon
the Findings of Fact contained in this Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval
(Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D).
Respectfully Submitted,
C1�1-1
Valerie C. Ross
Director of Development Services
on ang
Senior Planner
Attachment A Location Map
Attachment B Site Plan/Floor Plans/Elevations/Conceptual Landscape Plan
Attachment C Conditions of Approval
Attachment D Standard Requirements
Attachment E On-site Management Security Plan
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: DP3 NO. 06-06
PLANNING DIVISION
LOCATION MAP NORTH
LAND USE DISTRICTS HEARING DATE: 07.03.2007
I � I
'I
:F ff
JT
� I
r!'
PRO�ECS S��E Ti
I -
i
i I _
I
I
Ili;t_Il;, 1� `�:if"� ff1 lf�If1J P-1 -24 I Ali
ATTACHMENT B
Hill�J maw � � � _� � • FY-���9 � 1
gigso
ul
ags� � a �
Y /�
dAJOU tldL.VdJ IVJIUdW W •� Q
o <
r
a
1 � N
Z
QQ
s
I
;I
s �
D
i E
06 d� d
�lj� � � � ••�
i
kid Axed
Ph
Hill
a
r---- ------------�\1
I ITi 1� i i
o '
I y l i
I I
I ,
, I
i
�. I \� �• I I � y
I c
——————— — ——-----------
—
--
_ O
l ='1y w
W„�w
6
p� x
Q Q
Q
Q
a a
Q
m m a
m
0
oq
G �
.'y C
� e
a � U
iw (�
Q �+
Q
_Q
a a �
Q Q
Q
FF a
J m
O
�r_� o
o
\7/ — ' 3 Z
�j
I
I'
i
a
4W
.,
----- ------ --
r
^ 1 0
O
WQ V
I�1i y (y N
N
(: O
�I y
ry� �
W
Q
r
Q
Q
Q
a
Q Q
a
Z
Z x
W
V8 O
c x �
J6�F
V e
O 13 ..
Eu
1 s
i
i
I o C
ao
> Qs
� � o
O V o
QI Mri N
a
i
i, I�
Z 1
F w
W a
z y
o`
J
W
7
W
a�X
W,�A=
i E
i
� ag
o0
a �
Li N
N Q C
O U o
d
0 co
N
Fy N O
y pq z
� Ge
a
----- --
J
� x
F d
w
c y
J
w
w
0
VI;
}e-•f 11
x
r H
-
-
k
� ws
lb V
rn
0
b
4
^ � N
a EMS
O 0
r
I
II Iv
- Ef
Ing
Z x
x
i y
0
J
41
I
O
m8 A_
w m FH M I
EM
- � I
I
i
f rill _ -
a o U °
V
O
E13 z
�� p p m
all U a
l
EJI;
f� II i
-
w �
s y
`o
w
w
O
w�a
�3.
x �
S
_ s f
1 h
i
k'
AftkAft
O--� w
CL ) _
W O_
J
WWI Q
��e J
�
cr
0-W
Q z z w _�. _ __._
C)o 5z
0E:5U
ATTACHMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Development Permit 3 No. 06-14
1. This approval is for construction of a 3-story, 93-unit senior housing complex
with a recreation building on approximately 1.98 acres of land located at the
northwest corner of Medical Center Drive and 16th Street in the CO-1,
Commercial Office land use district.
2. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction shall
have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if
after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one
year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. However, approval of
the Development Permit does not authorize commencement of construction. All
necessary permits must be obtained prior to commencement of specified
construction activities included in the Conditions of Approval and Standard
Requirements.
Expiration Date: July 3, 2009
3. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the
expiration date and for good cause, grant a one-time extension not to exceed 12
months. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all
current Development Code provisions.
4. In the event this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the
defense of this matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify
and hold harmless the City of San Bernardino (City), the Economic Development
Agency of the City of San Bernardino (EDA), any departments, agencies,
divisions, boards or commission of either the City or EDA as well as
predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, elected officials, officers,
employees, representatives and attorneys of either the City or EDA from any
claim, action or proceeding against any of the foregoing persons or entities. The
applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees
which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but
such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this
condition.
The costs, salaries, and expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office
shall be considered as "attorneys fees" for the purpose of this condition.
Conditions of Approval
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3, 2007
Page 2
As part of the consideration for issuing this permit, this condition shall remain in
effect if this Development Permit is rescinded or revoked, whether or not at the
request of applicant.
5. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan(s) approved by the
Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and
Common Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be subject to approval
by the Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification
which exceeds 10% of the following allowable measurable design/site
considerations shall require the refiling of the original application and a
subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if applicable:
a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping;
b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures;
c. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification
of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved
theme; and,
d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project.
6. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be
occupied or no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no
new business commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of
Occupancy has been issued by the Department. A temporary Certificate of
Occupancy may be issued by the Department subject to the conditions imposed on
the use, provided that a deposit is filed with the Department of Public Works prior
to the issuance of the Certificate, if necessary. The deposit or security shall
guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terms, conditions and
performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit.
7. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the
Development Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20
- Property Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during
construction and grading activities; emission control of fumes vapors, gases and
p
other forms of air pollution; glare control; exterior lighting design and control;
noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street
loading; and, vibration control. Screening and sign regulations compliance are
important considerations to the developer because they will delay the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior structural
equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or meter cabinets shall be
architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending with the building
design and include landscaping when on the ground.
8. The residential occupancy shall be limited to single persons over 60 years of age or
married couples of which one spouse is over 60 years of age and shall be recorded
as a restriction on the deed.
Conditions of Approval
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3, 2007
Page 3
9. The security plan included herein as Attachment E shall be incorporated as part of
the Conditions of Approval.
10. All landscaped areas within the setbacks abutting Medical Center Drive and 16th
Street shall incorporate turf and shall be maintained on a weekly basis.
11. (*) The project applicant shall be responsible for regular maintenance of the project
site. Regular maintenance shall include miscellaneous on-site repairs including and
not limited to lighting, landscaping painting etc. and repaired within 24-hours
Vandalism, graffiti, trash and debris shall be removed and cleaned up within 24
hours.
12. If the color of the building is to be modified, the revised color scheme shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to painting.
13. All block walls shall be constructed of slump stone or split face block. Both sides of
the wall (above ground) shall have the decorative finish.
14. This approval shall comply with the requirements of other outside agencies (i.e.,
San Bernardino County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health
Services, and California Board of Equalization), as applicable.
15. Any security gates/bars, doors, window bars shall be installed on the inside of the
structure only. Video surveillance equipment installed/used on the exterior shall be
painted to_match the structure, or treated to blend with the architecture of the
development.
16. The applicant shall post a bond in an amount equivalent to the cost of landscaping
including landscape installation and one year of maintenance service. The purpose
of the bond is to ensure that all landscaping survives the planting process and last
for a period of at least one-year. The bond will be released no sooner than one-year
after issuance of the Final Certificate of Occupancy and only after such time as the
survival of the landscaping has been verified by City staff.
17. Construction-related activities shall not occur between the hours of 7 pm and 7 am.
No construction vehicles, equipment, or employees may be delivered to, or arrive at
the construction site before 7 am or leave the site after 7 pm. Construction activities
shall only occur Monday through Saturday.
18. Submittal requirements for permit applications (building, site improvements,
landscaping, etc.) to Building Plan Check and/or Public Works/Engineering shall
include all Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements issued with the
Planning approval.
Conditions ojApproval
DP3 No. 06-14
July 3, 2007
Page 4
19. M The applicant shall provide at least 15% of the dwelling units in the development
at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income and
such units shall be occupied by these persons or families in compliance with Health
and Safety Code Chapter 4 Article 9 Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(I)
20 (*) The recreation building shall be designed to accommodate assembly
occupancy up to 145 people.
21. No final Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until all conditions of approval
have been completed.
22. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the
following City Departments or Divisions:
a. Plan Check Division
b. Public Works
C. Fire Department
d. Public Services
e. Water Department
(*) Amended by the Planning Commission on July 17, 2007
ATTACHMENT D
City of San Bernardino
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
San Bernar In0 Development Services/Plan Check Division
w
Property address:
DRC/CUP/DP: t> 3
DATE: �• � �
NOTE; NO PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR
PLAN CHECK WITHOUT CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL IMPRINTED ON PLAN SH
Submit 6 sets of plans, minimum size 1 �- SETS,
expeditious review, submit 6 sets. The plans shall anclu o scale. If plan check is for
l
a. site plan (include address & assessors parcel umbelr)applicable):
b. foundation plan
C. floor plan (label use of all areas)
d. elevations
e. electrical, mechanical, & plumbing plans
f. detail sheets (structural)
g. cross section details
h. show compliance with Title 24/Accessibility (disabled access)
i. a plan check deposit fee will be required upon submittal of plans.
Call Development Services (plan check) 909-384-5071 for amount.
1. The title sheet of the plans must specify the occupancy classification, type of construction, if
the building has sprinklers, & the current applicable codes.
2. The person who prepares them must sign the plans. Also, provide the address & phone
number of that person. Some types of occupancies require that the plans are prepared,
stamped, and signed by an architect, engineer, or other person licensed by the State of
California.
3. For structures that must include an engineers design, provide 2 sets of stamped/wet signed
calculations prepared by a licensed architect/engineer.
4. Provide 2 sets of Title 24/Energy compliance forms and calculations. Some compliance
forms are required to be printed on the plans.
300 N 'D' Street San Bernardino CA 92418
909-384-5071 Office
909-384-5080 Fax
5. Submit grading, site, and/or landscape plans to Public Works/Engineering for plan check
approval and permits. For more information, phone 909-384-5111.
6. Fire sprinkler plans, fires suppression system plans, etc., shall be submitted to the Fire
Department for plan check approval and permits. For information, phone 909-384-5388.
7. Signs require a separate submittal to the Planning Division for plan check approval and
permits. For information, phone 909-384-5057.
8. Restaurants, food preparation facilities, and some health related occupancies will require
clearances and approved plans from San Bernardino County Health Department. For
information, phone 909-387-3043.
9. Occupancies that include restaurants, car washes, automotive repair/auto body, dentist
offices, food preparation facilities or processing plants, etc. may require approvals and
permits from San Bernardino Water Reclamation. For information, phone 909-384-5141.
10. An air quality permit may be required. Contact South Coast Air Quality Management
Division for information, phone 909-396-2000.
11. State of California Business & Professions Code/Contractors License Law requires that
permits can be issued to licensed contractors or owner-builders (that are doing the work).
Contractors must provide their State license number, a city business registration, and
workers compensation policy carrier& policy number. Owner-builders must provide
proof of ownership.
NOTE: PLAN CHECK TIME ON THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS IS APPROXIMATELY 4-6
WEEKS FOR 1ST CORRECTIONS. EXPEDITIOUS REVIEW IS APPROXIMATELY 10 WORKING
DAYS. THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS IS NOT THE BUILDING PLAN CHECK AND
DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE DESIGN AS SUBMITTED WILL BE APPROVED WITHOUT
CORRECTIONS.
Comments:
300 N `D' Street San Bernardino CA 92418
909-384-5071 Office
909-384-5080 Fax
ATTACHMENT D
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Development Services Department — Public Works Division
Standard Requirements
Description: A request to construct a 3-story, 1-2893-unit senior house
complex on approximately 1.98 acres of land
Applicant: Ricky Torres
Location: Northeast corner of Medical Center Drive and 16th Street
Case Number: DP 3 06-14
1. Drainage and Flood Control
a) A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage
improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate
downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed
and constructed and right-of-way dedicated as necessary at the
developer's expense.
b) If site drainage is to be outletted into the public street, the drainage
shall be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in
accordance with City Standard No. 400. Conveyance of site
drainage over the Driveway approaches will not be permitted.
c) A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) is required for this
project. The applicant is directed to the City's web page at
www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us — Departments — Development
Services — Public Works for templates to use in the preparation of
this plan.
d) A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required.
The applicant is directed to the City's web page at www.ci.san-
bernardino.ca.us — Departments — Development Services — Public
Works for templates to use in the preparation of this plan.
e) The City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit shall
approve the WQMP and the SWPPP.
Project: 3-story, Q,993-unit senior house complex on approximately 1.98 acres
Case No. DP 3 06-14
Page 2 of 7
f) A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the State Water
Resources Control Board for construction disturbing 1 acre or more
of land (including the project area, construction yards, storage
areas, etc.).
g) The City Engineer, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an
Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion
due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of
construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be
immediately built upon.
2. Grading and Landscapinq
a) The site/plot/grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a
Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required.
The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the
City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard
Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
b) If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal
permit conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the
Development Code shall be obtained from the Department of
Development Services-Planning Division prior to issuance of any
grading or site development permits.
c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading
bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in
accordance with Section 3317.2 of the California Building Code.
d) If more than 1,000 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City
Streets then a special hauling permit shall be obtained from the City
Engineer. Additional conditions, such as truck route approval,
traffic controls, bonding, covering of loads, street cleaning, etc. may
be required by the City Engineer.
e) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where
feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and
shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the
Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures").
f) Wheel stops are not permitted by the Development Code, except at
designated accessible parking spaces. Therefore, continuous 6"
high curb shall be used around planter areas and areas where
head in parking is adjacent to walkways. The parking spaces may
be 165 deep and may overhang the landscaping or walkway by
2.5'. Overhang into the setback area or into an ADA path of travel
(minimum 4' wide) is not permitted.
(11)(, ; VIL hang ar.L<X`ALS--I':remp\DP 3 06-14 DB dcxsi�-Rtiblie tax +ci E'
044"4-13 Woc I
07125/0707/19,1071
Project: 3-story,4 :�y 3-unit senior house complex on approximately 1.98 acres
Case No. DP 3 06-14
Page 3 of 7
g) Continuous concrete curbing at least 6 inches high and 6 inches
wide shall be provided at least 3 feet from any wall, fence, property
line, walkway, or structure where parking and/or drive aisles are
located adjacent thereto. Curbing may be left out at structure
access points. The space between the curb and wall, fence,
property line, walkway or structure shall be landscaped, except as
allowed by the Development Review Committee.
h) The number, size and placement of refuse enclosures shall
conform to the location and number shown on the site plan as
approved by the Planning Commission.
i) Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be
designed and detailed on the on-site improvement Plan. This work
shall be part of the on-site improvement permit issued by the City
Engineer. All walls shall be constructed of decorative block with
architectural features acceptable to the City Planner.
j) The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site
lighting, including light location, type of poles and fixtures,
foundation design, conduit location and size, and the number and
size of conductors. Photometry calculations shall be provided
which show that the proposed on-site lighting design will provide a
minimum of 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly distributed over
the surface of the parking lot.
k) The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all
requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to
accessible parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing
building access points for accessibility, if applicable.
1) An accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way
to the building entrance. All pathways shall be concrete paved and
shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking
overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6.5 feet.
m) Where an accessible path of travel crosses drive aisles, it shall be
delineated by textured/colored concrete pavement, unless
otherwise approved by the Development Review Committee.
n) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5
copies to the Engineering Division for Checking.
C:`,I-)OCI ML_ I`]ian, ar\LOCALS•--I`Tcmp\DP i 06-14 DB doc&I_ 'Alrii—I E1{ii
OE�-4l I3F3.�iFx.
07 251074 -{8IWI
Project: 3-story, E2993-unit senior house complex on approximately 1.98 acres
Case No. DP 3 06-14
Page 4 of 7
o) The public right-of-way, between the property line and top of curb
(also known as "parkway") along adjoining streets shall be
landscaped by the developer and maintained in perpetuity by the
property owner. Details of the parkway landscaping shall be
included in the project's on-site landscape plan.
p) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City
to allow the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in
case of owner neglect. Upon request, the Real Property Section
will prepare documents for execution by the property owner. The
documents shall ensure that, if the property owner or subsequent
owner(s) fail to properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be
able to file appropriate liens against the property in order to
accomplish the required landscape maintenance. A document
processing fee in the amount established by ordinance shall be
paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing costs. The
property owner, prior to plan approval, shall execute this easement
and covenant unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer.
Applicable to Commercial, industrial and multi-family development
only.
3. Utilities
a) Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in
accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the
serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and
cable TV (Cable TV optional for commercial, industrial, or
institutional uses).
b) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements
provided as required.
c) A street cut permit, from the City Engineer, will be required for utility
cuts into existing streets.
d) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on
either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with
Section 19.20.030 (non-subdivisions) or Section 19.30.110
(subdivisions) of the Development Code.
e) Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be
relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City
Engineer, except overhead lines, if required by provisions of the
Development Code to be undergrounded. See Development Code
Section 19.20.030 (non-subdivisions) or Section 19.30.110
(subdivisions).
C' OC_M -1'Jiang ar'LO( 11_S--I`,TemnlpP 3 06-14 DB.doc;!-Rc+�i4i�h14+k;herd E x;�e +rer3aeF '� U}F �
()(4-14 DR.-doe. I
0T25/0747:kg4 7
Project: 3-story, a 293-unit senior house complex on approximately 1.98 acres
Case No. DP 3 06-14
Page 5 of 7
f) Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be
maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to
City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction
Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can
be incorporated in the grading plan, where practical.
4. Mapping
a) A lot merger will be required for this project.
5. Improvement Completion
a) The required lot merger shall be recorded before the issuance of
Building permits. Improvements shall be completed prior to the
issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
6. Street Improvement and Dedications
a) All public streets and public easements within and adjacent to the
development shall be improved to City standards. Improvements
shall include combination curb and gutter, paving, access ramps,
street lights, sidewalks, and appurtenances, including, but not
limited to traffic signals, traffic signal modifications, relocation of
public or private facilities which interfere with new construction,
striping, and landscaping and irrigation in the landscape
maintenance district. All improvements shall be accomplished in
accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Design Policies and
Procedures" and City "Standard Drawings," unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street
Lighting Policies and Procedures." Street lighting shall be shown
on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by
the City Engineer.
b) For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-
way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to
property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the
street centerline shall be as follows:
I
I
Street Name Right of Way(ft.) Curb Line(ft)
NltGUM._______Ver-nen 44' Existing
Ave.-Medical Center
Dr.
C: Q00 I`.4ianY ar`LOCAL4-•I`lemp�DP 3 06 14 UB doc '.`... '
W4 44-DR-dcm I
07,25/070749,'07 4 '07
Project: 3-story. E2011-unit senior house complex on approximately 1 98 acres
Case No. DP 3 06-14
Page 6 of 7
c) Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200 adjacent to
the site. Widen pavement adjacent to the site to match new curb
and gutter. Construct approach and departure transitions for traffic
safety and drainage as approved by the City Engineer.
d) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site on 16th Street in accordance
with City Standard No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb).
e) If the existing sidewalk and/or curb & gutter adjacent to the site are
in poor condition, the sidewalk and/or curb & gutter shall be
removed and reconstructed to City Standards. Curb & Gutter shall
conform to Standard No. 200, Type "B" and sidewalk shall conform
to Standard No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb), unless
otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
f) Construct accessible curb ramps in accordance with City Standard
No. 205, modified as approved by the City Engineer to comply with
current ADA accessibility requirements, at all curb returns within
and adjacent to the project site. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way at
the corner to accommodate the ramp.
g) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type
ll, including an accessible by-pass around the top of the drive
approach. Remove existing driveway approaches that are not part
of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter and
sidewalk.
h) All Curb return radii shall be 25 feet minimum.
i) The pavement on existing streets adjoining the site shall be
rehabilitated to centerline using a strategy approved by the City
Engineer.
7. Required Engineering Plans
a) A complete submittal for plan checking shall consist of all required
site development plans and support documents. Piecemeal
submittal of various types of plans for the same project will not be
allowed.
b) The rough grading plan may be designed and submitted in
combination with the precise grading plan. If a rough grading
permit is to be issued prior to approval of the site development
plan, a rough grading plan is required.
c) All grading and improvement plans submitted for plan check shall
be prepared on the City's standard 24" x 36" sheets. A signature
( 1)OCL�tt, l.:lian, ar\L.00ALS- 1'\Temn\DP 3(Ki-14
07/25,07074W07
Project: 3-story, E2803-unit senior house complex on approximately 1.98 acres
Case No. DP 3 06-14
Page 7 of 7
block satisfactory to the City Engineer or his designee shall be
provided.
d) After completion of plan checking, final mylar drawings, stamped
and signed by the Registered Civil Engineer in charge, shall be
submitted to the City Engineer for approval.
e) Electronic files of all improvement plans/drawings shall be
submitted to the City Engineer. The files shall be compatible with
AutoCAD 2000, and include a .DXF file of the project. Files shall
be on a CD and shall be submitted at the same time the final mylar
drawings are submitted for approval.
f) Copies of the City's design policies and procedures and standard
drawings are available at the Public Works Counter for the cost of
reproduction. They are also available at no charge at the Public
Works Web Site at
http://www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us/site/pw/default.htm
8. Required Engineering Permits
a) Grading permit.
I
b) On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see
Development Services-Building Division), including landscaping.
c) Off-site improvement construction permit.
9. Applicable Engineering Fees
a) All plan check, permit, inspection, and impact fees are outlined on
the Public Works Fee Schedule. A deposit in the amount of 100%
of the estimated checking fee for each set of plans will be required
at time of application for plan check. The amount of the fee is
subject to adjustment if the construction cost estimate varies more
than 10% from the estimate submitted with the application for plan
checking.
b) The current fee schedule is available at the Public Works Counter
and at http://www.ci-san-bernardino.ca.us/site/pw/default.htm
c) Expeditious plan review is available. A non-refundable fee in the
amount of 125% of the estimated plan check fee for each set of
plans will be required at time of application for expedited plan
check. The amount of the fee is subject to adjustment if the
construction cost estimate varies more than 10% from the estimate
submitted with the application for plan checking.
C=DOCUML1`:1iangar\L0CALS-IVremp\DP 3 06-14 UB doe F
(1E 4.:}-014:dcc I
07%2 '070g4kEg
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: --2 o !.
Date:
Reviewed By: _
NERAL REQUIREMENTS:
Provide one additional set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check.
'Contact the City of San Bernardino Fire Department at(909)384.5585 for specific detailed requirements.
The developer shall provide for adequate fire flow.Minimum fire flow requirements shall be based on square footage,construction features,and exposure
information supplied by the developer and must be available prior to placing combustible materials on site.
ATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION:
The fire protection water service for the area of this project is provided by:
San Bernardino Municipal Water Department--Engineering (909)384-5391
East Valley Water District—Engineering (909)888-8986
F1 Other Water purveyor: Phone:
-------------------
PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES:
!IBC' Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 feet for commercial and multi-residential areas and at intervals not to exceed
500 feet for residential areas.
Fire hydrant minimum flow rates of 1,500 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for commercial and multi-residential areas.Minimum fire
T hydrant flow rates of 1,000 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for residential areas.
Fire hydrant type and specific location shall be jointly determined by the City of San Bernardino Fire Department in conjunction with the water purveyor.Fire
hydrant materials and installation shall conform to the standards and specifications of the water purveyor.
Public fire hydrants,fire services,and public water facilities necessary to meet Fire Department requirements are the developer's financial responsibility and
shall be installed by the water purveyor or by the developer at the water purveyor's discretion.Contact the water purveyor indicated above for additional
information.
ACCESS:
[] Provide two separate,dedicated routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance.The routes shall be paved,all weather.
j] Provide an access road to each building for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 20 feet of unob-
structed width.
Extend roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of all single story buildings.
Extend roadway to within 50 feet of the exterior wall of all multiple-story buildings.
Provide"NO PARKING"signs whenever parking of vehicles would possible reduce the clearance of access roadways to less than the required width. Signs
�2 are to read"FIRE LANE—NO PARKING--M.C.Sec.15.16".
El Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500 feet in length and shall have a minimum 40 foot radius turnaround.
F� The names of any new streets(public or private)shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval.
SI E:
All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction.
Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than 150 feet from the curb line. No fire hydrants should be within 40 feet of any
exterior wall.The hydrants shall be Wet Barrel type,with one 21/2 inch and 4 inch outlet,and approved by the Fire Department. Areas adjacent to fire
hydrants shall be designated as a"NO PARKING"zone by painting an 8 inch wide,red stripe for 15 feet in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a
manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles. Lettering to be in white 6"by 112".
.BUILDINGS:
Address numerals shall be installed on the building at the front or other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage street.Com-
mercial and multi family address numerals shall be 6 inches tall,single family address numerals shall be 4 inches tall.The color of the numerals shall con-
trast with the color of the background.
Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit it serves.
Fire extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 10B/C. Minimum distribution of
fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75 feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher.
Apartment houses with or more units,hotels(motels)with 20 or more units,or apartments or hotels(motels)three stories or more in height shall be
equipped with automatic fire sprinklers designed to NFPA standards.
All buildings,over 5,000 square feet,shall be equipped with an automatic Gre sprinker system designed to NFPA standards.This includes existing buildings
vacant over 365 days. No—r'FA ��'l/ �/t n y�( t�,
Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire epgrtment prior to bg nirSq c nstpOction of the system.Permit required.
Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of construction.Permit required.
Provide fire alarm(required throughout).Plans must be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of installation.Permit required.
Fire Department connection to sprinkler system/standpipe system,shall be required at Fire Department approved location.
Fire Code Permit required,apply at 200 east 3rd street,(909)384-5388.
Fire Sprinkler monitoring required. Plans must be approved by the Fire Department prior to the start of construction.Permit required.
Occupant Load.
Note:The applicant must request,in writing,any changes to Fire Department requirements.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A- ZAL.'t __. `Ti�
City of San Bernardino Public Services Department
Standard Development Requirements
300 North D Street - 4'11 Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92418
COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
Collection Services
1. The collection or transportation of refuse, recyclable discards, or green waste from any commercial and
industrial locations within the City shall be provided by the City of San Bernardino Public Services Department
unless otherwise franchised or permitted. [MC § 8.24.140]
2. New accounts require a completed Service Application, with a full deposit and a copy of manuals for all
compactor units, returned to the City of San Bernardino Refuse & Recycling Division prior to issuance of the final
I
Certificate of Occupancy.
3. Shared refuse and recycling services for multi-tenant commercial sites shall be billed to a single owner orl
property manager; leases shall include terms to accommodate sub-metered services.
4. All refuse containing garbage, such as food, vegetable, or animal wastes, shall be removed at least twice weekly,
and all other solid wastes shall be removed at least once weekly. [SB County Health, Sanitation and Animal
Regulations § 33.0831
5. All commercial establishments generating 6 cubic yards or more of solid waste per week shall establish City
recycling services for maximum diversion within 30 days of opening business, or establish an alternative
_diversion program to be identified in the IWM Survey for the project.
Automated Cart Service to Nonresidential Facilities
6. Nonresidential establishments such as small offices, shops, meeting halls, or churches, which generate 2 cubic
e yards or less of non-bulky waste per week and are located on the same side of a residential block receiving
automated cart service shall meet residential rather than commercial requirements.
Service Vehicle Access
7. shall meet City Engineering requirements for commercial vehicle drive access along the main ingress to
and egress from enclosures. These requirements shall not limit requirements for Fire vehicle access.
8. Property without through access shall incorporate at least one of the following designs:
• A cul-de-sac with a 40-foot turning radius for a 32-foot vehicle length
A hammerhead turn with a 40-foot turning radius for a 32-foot vehicle length
Gated Access
9. Gated properties that are locked and unmanned on service days anytime between the hours of 5 AM and 5 PM
Monday through Saturday shall provide access code or key to Public Services.
-------------------------------- ----------------------
Shared Collection Areas - Reciprocal Access
10. Front-load bin enclosures and roll-off compactor units may be shared across existing or proposed property
lines if enclosures or equipment provide adequate capacity for anticipated refuse and recyclable materials
generation, AND if Reciprocal Access for shared collection areas is recorded with the property.
Roll--off Compactor Units
MD PS 6.27.2003
1 I . Sealed compactor units dedicated separately to refuse and recyclables may be required to be installed at 1
facilities with an anticipated waste generation of 60 uncompacted cubic yards per week.
12. Roll-off compactor units must be installed according to manufacturer's and City Engineering specifications with I
the compactor hopper and roll-off box on a concrete slab with a minimum 3-foot continuously paved perimeter
for safe access. -- - - l
13. Roll-off boxes at locations receiving City service must meet City rail and hook specifications per City
Engineering Standard 510. Boxes shall be designed with disposal end opposite hook-up; boxes with same-side
design may be subject to a roll-back charge.
i'
14. Compactor equipment shall be screened from view of public right-of-way by materials compatible with building
architecture and landscaping as specified by City of San Bernardino Development Code. [MC § 19.20.030 (2 1)]
15. Location, orientation, and dimensions of enclosures, enclosure gates, pedestrian entry, compactor pads, and
compactor screening, shall be shown on site plans and labeled that construction shall meet City Engineering
Standards.
MDiPS 6.27.2003
City of San Bernardino Public Services Department
Standard Development Requirements
Page 2 of 2
Existing Bin Enclosures
16. Existing bin enclosures must have minimum inside dimensions of 7'9" x 9' OR 15' x 4'5" to fit two 3CY bins.
j Existing enclosures must have block walls, inside bumper guards or curbing, and solid steel gates, OR
enclosure(s) must be reconstructed to meet Engineering Standard 508. Enclosure may be relocated for best drive
access and alignment, plans subject to Public Services approval. (Please note, if site willgenerate 2CYorless of
solid waste per week, see Residential Collection options.)
Front-load Bin Enclosures & Access
17. Minimum double-wide enclosures of 8 feet by 15 feet shall be required for all development to allow for
dedicated recycling bins, except where potential waste generation or space is restricted. [Specifications adopted
in accordance with Model Ordinance as required by CA PRC §429111
18. Front-load compactor units must be contained in an enclosure large enough to hold the unit and one additional j
bin facing lengthwise.
19. Front-load bin and compactor enclosures must be constructed according to City Engineering Standard 508. Rear
or side pedestrian entry shall be provided on enclosures for all multi-unit residential development. Pedestrian
entry on free-standing enclosures shall have a 4--foot width, no gate or door, and an `L' shaped block screen the
same height of the enclosure.
20. Pedestrian access from building exit to bin enclosure shall be a minirnum 4 feet wide and continuously paved,
without crossing curbs, steps, or driveways.
21. Enclosure pads shall be level to restrict bins from drifting and designed for proper drainage of surface water.
22. Enclosures must be at least 5' from combustible walls, eave lines, or openings. [98 CA Fire Code § 1 103.2.2]
23. Only refuse bins and the contents therein for disposal may be stored in refuse enclosures. All other equipment,
fixtures, and materials such as electrical panels, circulation or exhaust ducts or vents, grease bins, or surplus
supplies are strictly prohibited.
24. Enclosures shall be buffered with landscaping when viewable from public right-of-way, and vegetation shall not
restrict gates or exceed height of enclosure. Include vegetation on landscape plans.
25. En2during lures shall be located with gates aligned for straight access for service vehicles.
26. res shall not obstruct drive aisles, driveways, loading zones, parking, handicap access, or visibility of
raffic from drive aisles, alleys, or streets. Location shall not cause service vehicle to block access drives
while bins are bei ng serviced.
i
ff27. Enclosure gates shall not open into drive aisles, parking spaces, or walkways. Enclosures placed adjacent to
parking shall be separated by a minimum 2-foot wide curbed area out to the farthest point of both gates, and
designed to safely restrict gates from opening into parking spaces or landscaped areas..
28. Location, orientation, and dimensions of enclosures, enclosure gates, and pedestrian entry, shall be shown on i'
site plans and labeled that construction shall meet City Engineering Standards.
Multi-unit Dwellings
29. Commercial requirements shall apply to all multi-unit dwellings over 8 units, unless otherwise approved.
MD/PS 6.27.2003
30. Disposal chutes incorporated into multi-story buildings must have dedicated chutes for refuse & commingled
recyclables. Both chutes shall be clearly and permanently labeled at each chute opening and exit. [Specifications
adopted in accordance with Model Ordinance as required by CA PRC §4291 1]
MD!PS 6.27.2003
fT•I G_.� � _ __
B° CONCRETE BLOCK 'MALLS -- — ----__-
�__._ GROUT ALL CELLS SCLID MIN. UMENSI
�-- GN S I
j- -- ���� BIN SIZE wy
C —
� ,
6' yID. BUMPER r/ I/"l"A.B / 2- 3 CY.
L 2- 4 CY. 8'-0" 15 - p"
3 • 2- N0. 4 6APS
1
A
NO. 4 BAR
24" O.C-
4"x6" W0. BUMPER
FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT
w/1/2"A.B. of I N0, 4 BAR
32" 0.C' of 4'-O"
o (COL*lTER9UNK)
0
SEE DETAIL'A' 12"STEEL SLEEVES Y
IN CONCRETE TO A"CONC. SLAB w/6x6
SECURE GATES 10/10 W.W.F.
(CONCRETE CLASS LFIN. GRADE
520-C-2500) I i
x x x
'12"STEEL SLEEVE IN
\ 8°x 12°0 CONCRETE ti N0. 4 BAR CONT
FOOTING TO SECURE 3„
GATES (TYP.)
le" I
PLAN VIEW
SECTION A-A
—
3 x6 C GATE FRAME GATES
CHANNEL /
/ BAR CHANNEL 2"x I"x $/16"
CROSS BRACING /
1/2"DRAIN HOLES of 12"0.C.
STEEL 3"x 3"x .1875
POST, WELD CAP 9
GRIND SMOOTH z
5"x S" H.D. BUTT I 1 po
HINGE BY STANLEY TYPE 8-24 METAL DECK I I 2"CL AR. — II
3 PER GATE, WELD 20 GAUGE PRIMER COATED I U _LU-
70 POSTS 8 GATE FRAME I-- —�— — — — — — — —
BY VERGO MFG. CO, TACK — — — —
WELD AT TOP 8 BOTTOM TO 1/2" Q GALV, STEEL 3 1/2"GALV. STEEL
CHANNEL at 12"O.C, CANE DOLT, STANLEY H.D. HASP, STANLEY
NOTES ND CO Icag (2
ELEVATIONS T
DETAIL 1At
I. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION , LATEST EDITION.
2. LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
3, WITHIN 5' OF COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALL A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER AS
APPROVED BY FIRE DEPT.
4. CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR.
5. SPECIFIED MANUFACTURERS SHOWN OR APPROVED EQUAL.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS DEPT APPROVED - s e STANVAU
�nAT ll
REFUSE ENCLOSURE EIREC OR OF PUBLIC WORKS / JOV
Y___.__ _ CITY ENGINEER
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DRC/ERC Case: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 3 NO.06-14
APN NUMBER: 269-151-28&0143-071-02
EPN NUMBER: - DATE COMPILED: 9/20/2006
REVIEW OF PLANS: COMPILED BY: Brunson,Ted
OWNER: Inland Desert Investment
DEVELOPER: Ricky Torres
TYPE OF PROJECT: A request to construct a 3-story, 128-unit senior house complex on approximately 1.98 acres of land located on the
northeast corner of Medical Center Drive and 16th Street in the CO-1,Commercial Office land use district.
NUMBER OF UNITS: 0
LOCATION: Northeast corner of Medical Center Drive and 16th Street
WATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING:
CONTACT: Lit:hfield, Matthew PHONE NUMBER: (909)384-5386 FAX NUM,-,ER: (909)384-5532
Note:All Water Services are Subject to the Rules-Regulations of the Water Department
U Size of Main Adjacent the Project 12"ST. in MEDICAL CENTER DR,8"CL&WP ST. in 16TH ST.
u Approximate Water Pressure 90 si Elevation of Water Storage: Hydrant Flow @ 20psi:
0 Type, Size, Location and Distance to Nearest Fire Hydrant 032-150 2 Way wb w/st. noz. (Iowa)in 16th St.
❑ Water Supply Study Required Pressure Regulator Required on Customer Side of the Meter
[] Offsite Water Facilities Required Water Main Reimbursement Due
❑ Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department
Network Hydraulic Analysis Required per Uniform Design Standards
Comments:
WATER QUALITY CONTROL
CONTACT: Arrieta,Con PHONE NUMBER: (909)384-5325 FAX NUMBER: (909)384-5928
k R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection for Domestic Service
Lj Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection for Fire and Irrigation
U Backflow Device to be Inspected before Water Service can be Activated
i j No Backflow Device is required at this time
SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION
CONTACT: Thomsen, Neil PHONE NUMBER: (909)384-5093 FAX NUMBER: (909)384-5592
Note:Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building_Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit
Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at this time
_! Sewer Capacity Fee must be paid to the Water Department for 0 Gallons Per Day: Equivalent Dwelling Units: 0
'V Subject to Recalculation of Fee prior to the Issuance of Building Permit
Breakdown Of Estimated Gallons Per Day
COPY TO: Customer; Planning; (Engineering
Wednesday,September 20, 2006 EPM Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT E
PIONEER SENIOR LIVING
SECtiRITY PLAN
L SECURITY PLAN
A. Overview/Design
1. Doors and Locks.
a. All units will be installed with the highest quality locks and
deadbolts. (A door knob-in-lock set will have a'dead latch'
mechanism to prevent slipping the lock with a shim or credit card.)
b. All units will have a secure door that is firm and fits tightly within
the door frame with a wide-angle 160 degree peephole mounted no
higher than 58 inches.
2. Sliding Glass Doors
a. All units will be issued a wooden dowel (stick) to lay in the track
thus preventing or limiting movement of the sliding door.
b. Other blocking devices available are metal fold-down blocking
devices called "charley bars" and various track-blockers that can be
screwed down.
3. Windows
a. All units will have secondary blocking device.
b. Block accessible windows no more than 6 inches for ventilation.
c. Use ant-lift devises to prevent window from being lifted out.
d. Use crime prevention decals on accessible windows.
4. Lighting
a. Good lighting will be along all pathways, at each door and
especially at the entryway.
b. Light timers (motion sensors) or photo-cells to turn on/off lights
automatically after dusk until dawn.
c. Any area that is shaded or dark will have extra lighting.
d. Management will have a system in place to periodically inspect and
replace lighting outages.
1
5. Cameras
a. 24 hour surveillance cameras will be installed in the parking area
and will be monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at an off site
location. The monitoring security company can contact the
appropriate agency in case of an emergency.
6. Access Control
a. Automatic gate with fencing will surround the complex giving
access strictly to the tenants.
b. Guest parking will be separate from the resident parking.
7. Management Duties
a. Assign parking spaces and record vehicle information.
(Parking Permit Decals may be required)
b. Require guests to park in designated visitor spaces
c. Be alert for illegal occupants and illegal activities.
d. Approach all strangers to ascertain occupancy status.
e. Walk the property at varies times of the day and night.
f. Participate with the local police department in any local crime
prevention seminars/classes.
g. Management will dedicate time and day for the residence to meet
in the community room to discuss a Neighborhood Watch Program
under the supervision of the police department.
Global Premier Development, Inc. will be open to as much security as possible so we know that
all of our tenants at Pioneer Senior Living are well protected.
2
EXHIBIT 3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Development Services Department, Planning Division
I 300 North "D" Street, 3`d Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92418
San Bernar ino Phone (909) 384-5057 . Fax (909) 384-5080
Web address: www.sbcity.org
APPLICATION FOR APPEAL
APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE (check one) 'l ( 7
❑ Development Services Director
❑ Development/Environmental Review Committee
-0 Planning Commission
Case number(s): Development Permit 3 No 06-14
Project address: Northwest Corner Medical Center Drive and 16th St.
Appellant's name: Lola Lee
Appellant's address: 1.57R W (-';lbw ct S $ d}nom I .
Appellant's phone: (909) 889-4667
Appellant's e-mail address:
Contact person's name: Same as above
Contact person's address:
ELiy
Contact person's phone: Gk VOPMET"" RVICES DEPARTMENT
Contact person's e-mail address:
Pursuant to Section 19.52.100 of the Development Code, an appeal must be filed on a City application form
within 15 days following the final date of action, accompanied by the appropriate appeal filing fee.
Appeals are normally scheduled for a determination by the Planning Commission or Mayor and Common
Council within 30 days of the filing date of the appeal. You will be notified, in writing, of the specific date and
time of the appeal hearing.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date appeal filed: C) 7
Received by:
1
11104
REQliIRED INFORMATION FOR AN APPEAL
Specific action being appealed and the date of that action:
Specific grounds for the appeal:
Seec�e�(
Action sought:
Additional information:
Signature of appellant: Date: 3� 6
2 11/04
Specific action being appealed and date of that action:
First we want to goon record and say that we support the San Bernardino City effort to
build Senior Citizen housing. However we are appealing the planning commissions
decision to allow this Senior center complex because we do not believe that it meets the
requirements of the General Plan. Further we believe that given the high crime rate in
this area the development will lead to blighted conditions that will enable an already large
criminal element to further expand. The date of that action was
Specific grounds for the appeal:
We are specifically requesting an appeal because we do not believe the following general
plan guidelines were followed:
2.1.1. Preserving and enhancing SB unique neighborhood, we do not
believe that this was adhered to.
2.1.2 We do not believe that enough thought was given on how the project
was designed to ensure the quality of life and safety in the existing
neighborhoods. Seventy five percent of the units will be only 538 sq.
ft. By approving this plan an agreement is being made to shoehorn
seniors into smaller liver quarters than other projects already
approved for the city. Why should our community be a dumping
ground?
2.2.9 Given the high level of crime in this area we do not believe that the
Police dept. reviewed the plan. We cannot find where the Police
department signed of that this project is a safe project. We see the
developers plan for security but why should the citizens of the ward
have to suffer from higher rates of crime and other adverse impacts
simply because there was not a police review of the plans.. In fact
the project does not take into consideration the close proximity of
the project to Little Zion Manor and the high crime rates of that
area. This area has had a high history of violence why should we put
seniors into this area and then expect them to fend for themselves?
2.5.6 K We do not believe that the new development values the physical
characteristics of the surrounding area. Instead the exterior building
design looks like a box-like prison structure. Exactly what 2.5.6 k
states that it should not do.
2.8.3 We do not believe this design protects the life and property of
residents, businesses and visitors from crime and as 2.83 states it
has not incorporated crime prevention through environmental
design. Instead with its parking structure it has incorporated an
element for the criminals to stalk senior victims.
2.10.3 We are particularly upset that as this project has been developing
section 2.10.3 has been blatantly disregarded. This community was
not offered an opportunity to provide input on this project.
Further we do not believe that the Community Hospital Strategic Area plan in particular
that part that speaks to improving safety to the area was followed.
We also believe that the Housing page 3-36 paragraph 2 where it states that an evaluation
must take place to prevent overcrowding was not followed in this project. 91 units of
seniors in this project is akin to herding cattle and giving them very little living space.
Under the redevelopment section of the plan there was no coordination with the
Northwest PAC therefore we believe that there was no due consideration given to the
potential for blighting conditions that section 3.2.5 seeks to prevent.
5.5.1 :TWoeroalso not believe that this development is compatible with the
nding community or with the hospital that is in close
ity
5.6.1 do not believe that the design of the structure will reduce
the visual impact of large scale building as required by section 5.6.1.
In fact we disagree with the applicant that this a three story building.
The 1"floor is parking with three floors above it for a total of four
stories.
5.6.2 We further believe that the project does not do enough to discourage
monotonous multi-family residences. The exterior of the building
can be liven up to give it character such that the seniors who will
use it will be proud of it as well the community who have to live
with it on a daily basis.
7.1.3 There was no effort made on the part of the developer or anyone
connected to the project to support and encourage community based
crime prevention efforts. Our neighborhood watch was not
contacted nor the individual residents for input.
7.1.7 Finally we do not believe that security measures and devices were
sufficiently incorporated into the design of the building.
There are more items to be considered from other members of the community and for
your review we have attached the statements of the current Councilman Rikke Van
Johnson, past ward Councilwoman Betty Anderson and community activist Frances
Grice.
The concerns can be grouped as such
• 9') units will cover 65% of the 1.9 acres and this does not include the
recreation building
• The unit does not follow HUD guidelines for Senior Housing
• The design of the recreation building appears to be an after thought. Each
time a question is asked concerning the recreation building a different size and
design is presented.
• The unit is listed as a mixed use senior citizen complex yet it allows residents
as young as 16 years of age to live there.
• The development code allows a maximum of 50%coverage of the building
plot this design allows for 65% a clear code violation
• The recreation area is inadequate for the number of residents anticipated
• How many of the 165 parking spaces, are underground spaces for resident and
how many are external spaces for guests.
• Why is the corner development considered infill development since the corner
directly across the street is undeveloped as well.
The following individuals from the community were also very concerned about this
project: Linda Hart, Charlotte Brevard Cheryl Brown, Anita Jones, Phillip Moreno,
Lawrence Hampton& Reggie Beamon
Action Sought:
Deny the proposed project resending the Planning commissions approval. Reduce the
size of the project, use proper setbacks & parking requirements and reduce the number of
units. Using standards established by other senior projects in the city.
DRAFT—11/09/07
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ASSITANCE TO
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, OPERATION PHOENIX EASTERN AREA
1. INTRODUCTION
The Mayor's Office has developed and initiated Operation Phoenix, a coordinated
response to crime and related family and youth issues and to create long-term
neighborhood assets, in target areas in the City with a high rate of Part I crimes.
Operation Phoenix addresses the complex issues contributing to crime and violence
through partnership with the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino City Unified
School District, the State Department of Corrections, and California State University San
Bernardino.
The initial success of Operation Phoenix between June 10, 2006 and December 31, 2006,
included a 37.59% reduction in UCR Part I crime in the original target area. There was
also a 2 1.11% citywide reduction of UCR Part I crime, compared to 2005, during that
same time period.
On June 4, 2007, the City Council identified five additional target areas for possible
expansion of Operation Phoenix.
• Central Area(expanded) one mile circumference of Wabash and Sierra
• Eastern Area one mile circumference of Sterling and Highland
• Northern Area one mile circumference 44th and Sepulveda
• Western Area one mile circumference around 16`b and California
• Southern area one mile circumference around approximately Mill and Meridian
Funding and operational expenses are limited for this expansion. In order to expand to
the Eastern Phoenix Area the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino
are interested in entering into a Memorandum of Understanding to provide shared
resources. This sharing of resources is consistent with the continuing protocol combining
City and County resources in the Central Phoenix Area.
2. DURATION OF AGREEMENT
This agreement is to be in effect from December 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008.
3. COMMITMENTS TO OPREATION PHOENIX EASTERN AREA
County Su port
• The County will deploy an additional five Deputy Sheriffs' and one Sergeant
to be assigned to the county unincorporated areas in eastern San Bernardino
Nar 21
1 Y-2 /-07�o
J
DRAFT— 11/09/07
and western Highland, for purposes of coordination with the San Bernardino
Police Department and mutual efforts in the Operation Phoenix Eastern Area.
• The County will augment county code enforcement activities in the Eastern
Phoenix Area, including coordination and collaboration with city code
enforcement activities in the Eastern Phoenix Area.
• The County will make a $98,000 contribution to Operation Phoenix budget for
purposes of defraying the costs associated with the City of San Bernardino
programs for the Operation Phoenix Eastern Area as described below.
City of San Bernardino
• The City will create and coordinate an Operation Phoenix Street Team and its
activities in the Eastern Area. The City will create a Street Team that consists of
representatives from the various partner agencies that are engaging residents in
the target area through direct services. Ongoing communication and coordination
of partner agencies will occur through regular meetings of the Street Team to
maximize collaboration and quality services to residents in the target area. A
representative from the Sheriff's Office and County Code Enforcement will be
invited to participate in Street Team meetings to insure coordinated efforts
between City and County services.
• The City will establish a physical center in the Eastern Area to provide
supervised, after school and evening activities for children and youth in the focus
area. The center will also act as the coordination location for the Operation
Phoenix Street Team and other various outreach activities by the city, the county,
and other government, nonprofit and community agencies.
• The City will augment police services, code enforcement services, and graffiti
abatement in the Eastern Area, and it will enhance street lighting other public
improvements in the Eastern Area, as the Operation Phoenix budget provides.
These mutual commitments by the County and the City will cover the area designated by
the Operation Phoenix Eastern area which includes County pockets. A map of the area is
attached and by reference is part of the Memorandum of Understanding.
If conflict resolution is required among City and County agencies, it will be facilitated
through the Operation Phoenix Steering Committee which serves as an advisory
committee on operational issues to the Mayor and County Supervisors.
4. ADMINISTRATION
Administration of this program will coordinated through the Operation-Phoenix
Executive Team and Street Team consistent with the organization structure and protocol
established by Operation Phoenix.
-2-
DRAFT— 11/09/0
5. MUTUAL IDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE
The City of San Bernardino shall defend, indemnify, and hold the County of San
Bernardino and its agencies, their respective officers, employees, and agents harmless
from and against any and all liability, loss expense, attorneys' fees, or claims for injuries
or damages are causes as a result of the negligent or intestinal acts or omissions of the
City of San Bernardino, its officers, agents or employees, The costs, salaries, and
expenses of the City Attorney and member of his office enforcing this contract on behalf
of the City shall be considered as "Attorneys' Fees" for the purposes of this paragraph.
The County of San Bernardino shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City of San
Bernardino, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all
liability, loss, expense, attorney's fees, or claims for injuries or damages arising out of the
performance of this agreement, but only in proportion to, and to the extent such liability,
loss, expense, attorney's fees, or claims for injuries or damages are caused as a result of
the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the County of San Bernardino or its
agencies, their respective officers, agents, or employees. The costs, salaries, and expenses
of the County Counsel and members of his office enforcing this contract on behalf of the
City shall be considered as "Attorneys' Fees" for the purpose of this paragraph.
-3-
Gfo6a[Premzer
D a,
January 7, 2008
City Council
San Bernardino
Re: Pioneer Senior Living, Spur Bernardino, CA
Dear Councilman Rikke Van.Johnson:
I am writing to express Global Premier Development, Inc.'s interest in redesigning the
proposed project, Pioneer Senior Living (the "Project"), for submission to the City of
San Bernardino (the "City").
After attending the City Council meeting and hearing the neighborhood comments and
safety concerns with respect to the Project, we respectfully request the opportunity to
submit a redesign of the Project to the City for reconsideration.
We have taken the comments into consideration and are prepared to provide any
revisions necessary to make this Project work for the City.
We are anxious to bring this dynamic affordable housing community to the Senior's of
the City and hope that the City will welcome the redesign.
Please contact me with any questions.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Best R ds,
Cam-'
Ricky "Torres
Project Manager
/V / ZS A