HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-Public Works
.
o
o
WHAT
congestion Management Program (CMP) - Plan to eliminate traffic
congestion by control of land use decisions or allocation of state
and Federal Tax dollars to cities and counties.
WHEN
1989 State Legislature stated CMP to be a program to help keep
California moving. In June 1990, Proposition 111 passed by voters
of the state and mandated preparation of a CMP in urbanized
counties.
WHO
In September 1990 SANBAG became Congestion Management Agency
(CMA) for San Bernardino County. Legislation required
establishment of CMA and rather than create another agency, it was
determined SANBAG could fill this role with all cities being a part
of SANBAG. Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG) would
provide socio-economic data and be basis for tests of consistency
of model and results.
WHY
In late 1980's growth was creating traffic congestion on all
roadways, development in one community impacted another, voters
allocated monies to fund improvements but required that congestion
be addressed and if that meant controlling land use and
development, then so be it. Failure would result in loss of tax
dollars.
HOW
.
Projects of specific size or larger would all follow a uniform
procedure to assess traffic impacts (use a consistent model), allow
review and input by adjacent agencies that were affected, address
impacts and provide for solutions. This established the need for
TIA, consistent models, review by CMA, address long range impacts,
alert political bodies of potential impact and allow for collection
of fees if desired.
IMPACTS
All projects over a specified size or number of trips must prepare
a TIA and be deemed consistent with the established model by CMA
and city. Impacts of the development must be identified, a section
of the TIA must assign reasonable costs to mitigate to acceptable
level of congestion, TIA must track impacts 5 miles away or 50 new
trips on the system that are generated by the project, TIA must be
completed before project approved (open to debate and
interpretation)
.:;Flf
/0;17/71
.
,
I
I
~
..
o
o
Smaller proj ects are picked up in background growth of larger
projects. Model began in 1990 and runs to 2010 and is based on
cities best estimate of growth as provided for in general plans.
Data updated yearly. Freeway improvements become responsibility of
adjacent cities, not Caltrans.
Once traffic degrades to specific level, a deficiency plan must be
developed to say how and when it will be corrected and funding
sources id~ntified. No additional trips can be added to system
until problem solved. Failure to solve problems or stop
development results in loss of Gas Tax and ISTEA funding to city
(all monies used to maintain and construct streets and traffic
improvements).
PURPOSE
To relieve traffic congestion. To allow adjacent agencies
opportunity to comment and address secondary impacts to their
transportation systems and exact payment for problems not created
by their development. To advise policy makers of potential future
impacts and allow them to address future costs through present
collections (assess impact cost to development) although it is
incorrect to say policy makers must do this. To control land use
and development as a means of controlling traffic growth or exact
financial penalties.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Realize that development may indeed impact traffic congestion.
Decide proper course of action, that is, decide if develop.ent
should pay a "fair share", if city will assume responsibility for
necessary improvements in future or if city should control future
development so congestion never occur.
To plan for future suing best available data.
o
ATTENDANCE SHEET
DATE:
/CJ-/7- 9 Y TIME:
y()~~-;---,/ <i C_C~
MEETING:
LOCATION:
o
~
~
~
Note: Pursuant to Government Code section 54953.3 the signing,
registering or completion of this document is voluntary, and all
individuals may attend the meeting regardless of whether they
sign, register or complete this document.
.
Fi,d W;kDh
-G~~
c~3~~
(.
'1~___
DEPARTMENT
CLJo;J C J L Jv1A-IJ
0~~jQ~~Z~
/4/\ W;r../ I.A,
Slt tl ~.
IYttt;fl
~~
R/-h?.ut/
~~~ O~
S~v~~6
G {'t lou/.\.c \ (
.,
l/
13,011-
~ ' -J!:'
~
1;::'~1 -,
GY1 ~-~
~~ dJ. o/~
t~~r::Ir
o
o
ATTENDANCE SHEET
DATE:
10-/7-'11
m CUJ?f1 ~r1 c C-
TIME:
~/
MEETING:
LOCATION:
~
~
Note: Pursuant to Government Code section 54953.3 the signing,
registering or completion of this document is voluntary, and all
indi viduals may attend the meeting regardless of whether they
sign, register or complete this document.
ATTENDING:
NAME
DEPARTMENT
.
Ii=> A-.,RlU II- I B7[
k'\.- '"'Bo L>6<,v.et.{
")~ 1hv'(-:5
U, ~ e /2v.5".5
LJ.szh h/)~/l-JlfT
f( () C,"c-1< )f/jJe1J6 .t2/f vt-
6ellP R I(lal--J-
Jr-A'/ -t ~/JVI.Y':;,
~S
/ I I I
(/ //
/ I /)
/tI$. w;t..f'
fJ/J