HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-198
1
RESOLUTION NO.
8~j-198
2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PRELIMINARILY
DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE
FORMATION OF A LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT;
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROCEED TO ORDER WORK WITHIN THE
DISTRICT, TO BE KNOW AS "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 956"; AND
SETTING AND DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF A TIME AND DATE
OF A PUBLIC HEARING.
3
4
5
6
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino (hereinafter called
7
"City") as an exercise of its municipal affairs powers has
8
enacted an Assessment District Ordinance (Municipal
Code
9
Chapter 12.90) to provide for the procedure for the formation
of assessment districts within the City; and
10
11
WHEREAS, it has now become necessary to consider the
12
formation of a landscaping maintenance assessment district
within the City, to be known as "Assessment District No. 956";
13
and
14
15
WHEREAS, as a further exercise of the powers vested in
the City by virtue of Section 19, Article XVI, California
16
17
Constitution, the City intends to conduct a hearing and hear
18
protests, if any, as to why the district should not be formed
19
and the acquisitions and improvements completed,
without
compliance
with
the Special
Asssessment
Investigation,
20
21
Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931;
22
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO THAT:
23
SECTION 1.
Pursuant to Chapter 12.90 of the San
24
25
Bernardino Municipal Code, the Mayor and Common Council of said
City, hereby preliminary find and determine that the public
II
~ convenience and necessity require, and it is the intention of
the Mayor and Common Council to form Assessment District No.
26
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 II
II
23 I!
24 I
,
25
26 I
,
27 II
28 Ii
I'
956, the boundaries of which are generally, as follows:
Bounded on the West by Waterman Avenue; on the East by
Tippecanoe Avenue; on the South generally by Interstate Highway
10; on the North generally by the Santa Ana River and by Brier
Drive.
Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on
file in the office of the City Clerk of said City for a map of
the boundaries of said district, a description of the type of
improvement, an estimated cost of the improvement and a pro-
posed assesment roll which Report and Assessment District Map
are hereby approved.
SECTION 2.
It is the intention of said Mayor and
Common Council to order improvements within the district which
improvements
consist of,
but are not limited to,
the
maintenance of landscaping in portions of Waterman Avenue,
Carnegie Drive, Vanderbilt Way, Hospitality Lane, Harriman
Place, Brier Drive and Tippecanoe Street within the boundaries
of said District and the administration thereof.
The estimated cost of said maintenance, including inci-
dental costs is $117,382.00.
SECTION 3.
Said contemplated work and improvements is
of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and that said
Mayor and Common Council do hereby make the expense of such
work and improvement chargeable upon the district, which dis-
trict is hereby declared to be the district benefited by said
proposed work and improvement, and to be assessed to pay the
cost and expense thereof.
All public streets or alleys, or
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
portions thereof. hereby are excepted from said assessment.
SECTION 4. The assessment benefit procedure to be
followed and the amount to be assessed against each particular
parcel will be a proportion of the total sum of the cost of the
maintenance and incidentals within the area in relation to the
area of each parcel of land therein. Reference is hereby made
to said Engineer's Report on file in the office of the City
Clerk for a detailed estimated individual assessment.
SECTION 5. The assessment financing alternative to be
followed shall be as follows. to-wit:
The costs shall be pre-funded by the City and the
assessment levied. collected and enforced in the same manner.
at the same time. and with the same penalties and interest as
in the case of taxes levied for the City for the repayment to
the City of said pre-funding.
The assessment for said district shall be made and
collected as follows: The costs of the maintenance contract.
water and energy costs and incidentals will be collected in
perpetuity unless otherwise terminated by the City.
SECTION 6. That notice is hereby given that on July 1.
1985. at the hour of 9:00 a.m.. in the Council Chamber. in the
City Hall of said City. there shall be a public hearing before
said Mayor and Common Council for the purpose of determining
whether the public convenience and necessity require the forma-
tion of the proposed improvement district without compliance
with the Special Assessment Investigation. Limitation and
Majority Protest Act of 1931 and whether the Mayor and Common
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
Council should proceed with ordering the above described main-
tenance.
At said hearing. any and all persons interested may
appear and show cause. if any they have. why the Mayor and
Common Council should not find and determine that the public
convenience and necessity require the formation of the proposed
district without compliance with the Special Assessment
Investigation. Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931; on
the question of estimated cost. and the intention of the Mayor
and Common Council to proceed to order work within the
district.
SECTION 7. At said public hearing. all persons will be
heard. any holder of title to taxable real property within the
boundaries of the proposed district may file a protest in
writing with the City Clerk. not later than the hour
hereinabove set for hearing. containing therein a description
of the property in which the signer thereof is interested
sufficient to identity the same. and. if the signers are not
shown on the last equalized assessment roll as the owners of
such property. must contain or be accompanied by written
evidence that such signers are the owners of such property.
The basis for determining the existence of a majority protest
shall be based on the area of respective lots or parcels invol-
ved in proportion to the area of the entire district.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk is authorized and directed
to cause a copy of this resolution to be published in a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City. and
that said Clerk shall cause a notice of the adoption of this
4
10
1
resolution to be posted and mained as required by Section
2
12.90.040C of the Municipal Code of the City of San Bernardino.
3
SECTION 9. A copy of this resolution and a map showing
the exterior boundaries of the proposed improvement district
with relation to the territory immediately contiguous thereto
and to the proposed improvement will be on file with the City
Clerk and will be available for inspection by any person or
4
5
6
7
persons interested.
This map shall govern for all details as
8
to the extent of the proposed improvement district.
9
11 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
12
13
Bernardino at a
regular
meeting thereof, held
on the
day of
,
1985, by the
1rd
June
14 foll owi ng vote, to wi t:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AYES:
Council Members Estrada. Reillv. Hernandez.
Marks, Frazier. Strickler
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Council Member Ouiel
~t1(4~~
/ C ty Cler
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved
this
..$./7/
day of
June
, 1985.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
II
Approved as to form:
~~:ev
C1 ty Attorney
6
May 20, 1985
File No. 14.40-20
ENGINEER'S REPORT
Carnegie Drive Area Landscaping Maintenance District
Regarding the improvements in the Carnegie Drive Area by the
main~enance of landscaping in Waterman Avenue, Vanderbilt Way, Carnegie
Drive, Brier Drive, Hospitality Lane, Harriman Place and Tippecanoe
Avenue, the costs are estimated as follows:
Inspection:
$73,382.00
$35.000.00
$ 5.000.00
$ 4,000.00
$117.382.00
Maintenance Costs:
Water and Electricity:
1st Year Assessment Engr.:
Total to be Assessed:
This information together with the attached ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MA~
and PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL is being filed pursuant to Chapter 12.90 of
the City's Municipal Code relative to the forthcoming Resolution of
Intention for the establishment of an Assessment District to be know as
Assessment District No. 956.
'-- .
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
VJN:pa
Attach.
PROPOSED 1985 ASSESS. ROLL. ASSESS. DiSTR. 956
ASS/iT ASSESSORS TOTAL ASSliT
'NO. PRCL. NO.
1 281-341-06 4736.94
2 281-341-05 4373.32
3 28.1-341-04 3572.36
4 281-021-31 6962.92
5 281-341-02 1184.23
6 281-351-01 727.24
7 281-351-02 727.24
8 .. 281-351-03 1017.16
9 281-351-04 727.24
10 281-351-05 712.50
11 281-351-06 1184.23
12 281-351-07 1071.21
13 281-351-08 1071.21
14 281-351-09 1346.39
15 281-351-10 2284.93
16 281-351-11 1641. 22
17 281-351-12 1474.15
18 281-351-13 1778.81
19 281-351-14 1533.12
20 281-351-15 3036.75
21 281-351-16 1346.39
22 281-341-01 1375.87
23 281-341-03 2004.84
24 281-371-09 1823.03
25 281-371-10 899.23
26 281-371-11 5896.61
27 281-371-03 21331.01
28 281-361-05 3331. 58
29 281-361-06 3542.88
ASSi1T; ASSESSORS TOTAL ASSMT
~(J. PRCL. NO.
,
30 281-361-07 3272.62
31 281-361-08 2825.46
32 281-361-09 2997.44
33 281-361-03 2053.98
34 281-361-04 2044.16
35 .281-361-02 3248.05
36 281-361-01 2997.44
37 281-371-08 3429.86
..
38 281-371-07 . 3439.69
"
39 281-371-06 4373.32
40 281-371-05 3985.13
TOTALS
~0040 40
117381. 76
. .....
.". ...... -. ..:..:
. :-. ::......-:.!. :.~ :f:~':':;.
..
-:.. .-!:- .
,
....:". .--. .
:-- . ~:_- ..:-. . ;-.. ~ .....:::.
,
". _. - .. . .." _a.