HomeMy WebLinkAboutR45-Economic Development Agency
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FROM:
Gary Van asdel,
Executive Director
SUBJECT:
AMENDMENTS TO STATE OFFICE
BUILDING AGREEMENTS (pHASE II)
DATE:
May 7, 2001
C ill ". .. ..
d..
SvnoDsis of Previous Commission/Council/Committee Action(s):
January 4, 1996: Construction Project Management, Operating and Development Agreement (Caltrans Office Building
and Parking facility) executed by and between the Redevelopment Agency, the San Bernardino Joint Powers Financing
Authority, and the Department of General Services and Department of Transportation of the State of California.
June 11, 1999: Exchange Agreement (Phase II Site/9th and Del Rosa) by and between the Redevelopment Agency and
the Department of General Services of the State of California.
August 23, 2000: Amendment to Exchange Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency and the Department
of General Services of the State of California.
December 18, 2000: The Community Development Commission authorized extension of the closing date in the State
Exchange Agreement to match the closing of the 303 Third Street transaction between the State and 303 LLC.
SvnoDsis of Previous Actions Continued to Next Pal!e".
Recommended Motion(s):
(Communitv DeveloDment Commission)
MOTION:
That the Community Development Commission approve/ratifY execution of the attached Letter
Agreement by the Chairperson on behalf of the Agency to amend the 1996 Construction Management
Agreement as between the Department of General Services and the Agency regarding construction of
the Phase II State Office Building.
Contact Person(s): Gary Van asdel/John Hoeger
Project Area(s) Central City and Central City North
Phone: 663-1044
Ward(s): One (I)
Supporting Data Attached: lID Staff Report 0 Resolution(s) 0 Agreement(s)/Contract(s) 0 Map(s) 0 LetterlMemo
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
$ None
Source: N/ A
N/A
SIGNATURE:
--Co;;-;;;ti~-;I;;;;Jcou;cil-Noies;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GVO:JBH:lag:05-07-01 DGS Agreement
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: 05/07/2001
Agenda Item Number: ~
Request for Commission/Council Action
Department of General Services
May 3,2001
Page Number Two
Synopsis of Previous Commission/CounciVCommittee Action(s) Continued:
February 22, 2001: The Redevelopment Committee recommended a five year extension of the State's
construction obligation for the second office building.
March 5, 2001: Community Development Commission continued item at request of staff.
April 2, 2001: The Community Development Commission approved a Letter Agreement amending
the 1996 Construction Management Agreement between the Department of General Services and the
Agency deleting the requirement for the State to commence construction of the second office tower
----------------..-------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------------------------------------
GYO:ffiH:lag:05-07-01 DGS Agreement
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: 05/07/2001
Agenda Item Number: A'I5'
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STAFF REPORT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amendments To State Office BuUdinl! Al!reements (Phase II)
The Commission approved an action on April 2, 2001 to amend the Agency's Construction
Management Agreement with the State of California deleting the requirement that construction
of its Phase II building commence within 180 days after the transfer of title to the Phase II Site
from the Agency to the State. Deletion of this provision would allow the proceeds of the State's
sale of its 303 Third Street building to be released to the Agency and title to transfer to the State
without triggering an infeasible construction requirement on the State for the Phase II tower.
However, shortly after the Commission Meeting of April 2, 2001, certain business leaders
expressed concern that the Commission's action had released the State out of its "commitment"
to build the second office tower and thereby opening the door for Riverside to attract said State
building. Consequently, the Letter Agreement amending the 1996 Construction Management
Agreement was not executed by the Mayor and never forwarded to the State for acceptance.
BACKGROUND
The Commission may recall that when 303LLC purchases the 303 Third Street building from the
State of California, it will trigger certain performance obligations under the Exchange
Agreement and the Construction Management Agreement for the State Office Buildings at
Fourth and E Streets. Consummating the 303 Third Street purchase will cause funds to be paid
from 303LLC to the State that will then be released to the Agency to complete the State's
purchase of the Phase II Site adjacent to the Caltrans Building on Fourth and E Streets. The
Construction Management Agreement requires the State to begin construction of a 195,000
square foot six-story office building within 180 days of transfer of the Phase II Site and gives the
Agency a right to reacquire the Site upon payment of $1,770,500 to the State if the State fails to
build the second office tower after title has transferred to the State.
According to State officials, there are not currently a sufficient number of State employees in the
San Bernardino area to warrant construction of the second office tower at this time, and, even if
there were, it would take at least five years to process the necessary legislation and obtain
funding authority for the project. Thus, under the current agreement between the parties, when
the State completes the purchase of the Phase II Site as required with the proceeds from the sale
of the 303 West Third Street property, it will be unable to construct the second office tower and
will fall under a "reverter cloud" which will allow for the Agency to reacquire the Phase II Site
at anytime thereafter upon payment of $1,770,500. Although the Agency is not presently
intending nor does it have the resources to exercise its right to reacquire the Phase II Site, the
State cannot be sure that the Agency's position will not change over time. The potential for the
Agency to exercise its reverter rights could jeopardize the State's ultimate ability to plan for the
Site.
---..-------------.--.-----------------------.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----
GVO:ffiH:lag:05-07-01 DGS Agreement
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: 05/07/2001
Agenda Item Number: 1f'l5'
Economic Development Agency Staff Report
Department of General Services
May 3, 2001
Page Number -2-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to these uncertainties and the long time frames involved, the State requested that the Letter
Agreement modify all obligations of the State under the Construction Management Agreement.
See the motion as approved by the Commission on April 2, to delete the State's obligation under
the Construction Management Agreement.
CURRENT ISSUE
During the past two weeks the City Attorney, along with Agency Special Counsel, have been
negotiating with State representatives in an effort to reach mutually acceptable provisions of a
revised Letter Agreement to amend the 1996 Construction Management Agreement. The details
of the revised Letter Agreement will be presented by the City Attorney and Agency Special
Counsel at the Commission meeting.
It is important for all concerned to realize that under the 1996 Construction Management
Agreement the State was not, is not and never will be required to build the second office tower.
The same can also be said about the proposed Letter Agreement. However, according to State
representatives, in light of the State's investment in the Phase II Site and the plans for developing
said Site, it is highly unlikely that the State would abandon its investment and construct a
competitive office building in some other community.
FISCAL IMPACT
This action is for a change in performance and does not change the financial terms of the
transactions. Closing the 303 Third Street building will result in payments to the Agency of
approximately $750,000. This will complete the payment for the Phase II Site (which originally
totaled $2,681,500). Caltrans will have $560,367 left owing on the Phase I Site (which originally
totaled 3,835,365).
RECOMMENDA nON
Based upon the foregoing, staff recommends that the Community Development Commission
approve/ratify execution of the form of the Letter Agreement by the Chairperson on behalf of the
Agency to amend the 1996 Construction Management Agreement as between the Department of
General Services and the Agency to delete from the Construction Management Agreement the
requiremen for the construction of the Phase II State Office Building and include certain State
obligaf for the d elopmpnd maintenance of the Phase II Site in the Letter Agreement.
~ ~ a-I
ary Va Osdel, Executive Dire or
Econo c Development Agency
GYO:JBH:lag:05-07-01 DGS Agreement
COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
Meeting Date: 05/07/2001
Agenda Item Number: -B 'I ~
City of San Bernardino
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Redevelopment. Community Development. Housing. Business: Recruitment, Retention, Revitalization. Main Street, Inc.
~
May 10, 2001
Mr. Michael Courtney, Deputy Director
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
1102 Q Street, Suite 6000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: MODIFICATION OF OBLIGATIONS AS TO THE PHASE II SITE - SAN
BERNARDINO STATE OFFICE PROJECT; CONTINUING DGS PROPERTY
MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS
Dear Mr. Courtney:
This Letter Agreement is executed by and between the Department of General Services of the
State of California ("DGS") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino (the
"Agency") with respect to certain provisions contained in the Construction Project Management,
Operating and Development Agreement (Caltrans Office Building and Parking Facility) dated
January 4, 1996 (the "Construction Management Agreement"). DGS and the Agency have also
entered into that certain Exchange Agreement dated as of May 21, 1999, as amended (the
"Exchange Agreement"), with respect to the transfer of title of the Phase II Site from the Agency
toDGS.
The Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino acting as the
governing body of the Agency (the "Commission") has duly authorized the execution and
delivery of this Letter Agreement which is intended to modify the Construction Management
Agreement in the manner as hereinafter set forth but solely as between the Agency and DGS and
not as the other parties thereto.
DGS and the Agency mutually agree that on and after (i) the date of the sale by DGS of the
former State Office Building located at 303 East Third Street, San Bernardino, to a party
acceptable to the Agency, and (ii) the transfer of title from the Agency to DGS of the Phase II
Site (which transfer shall occur by Grant Deed within seven (7) days after the close of escrow on
the sale of the 303 East Third Street, San Bernardino property) as referred to in the Construction
Management Agreement and the Exchange Agreement, all provisions of the Construction
201 North E Street, Suite 301 . San Bernardino, California 92401-1507' (909) 663-1044 . Fax (909) 888-9413
www.sanbernardino-eda.org.
---,-I.' .-_._--
c_.'
MR. MICHAEL COURTNEY
May 10,2001
Page Number 2
Management Agreement, including but not limited to Section 3, Section 4(b), (c), (d), (e) and (t),
Section 6(c) (1) and (2) and (d) and Section 7, which refer to the Phase II Site shall be deemed to
be deleted in their entirety and of no further force and effect. Thereafter, the sole obligations of
DGS to the Agency for the Phase II Site shall be as set forth in this Letter Agreement and
specifically with reference to the items contained below:
I. If authorized and funded by the State Legislature, DGS hereby irrevocably commits that
on or before ten (10) years from the date of this Letter Agreement, unless extended as
hereinafter provided, DGS shall construct or cause to be constructed a State Office
Building on the Phase II Site consisting of a multi-story office building for the State of
California govemmental offices of at least 150,000 gross square feet together with the
provision of an adequate number of on-site parking spaces to be located within either an
adjacent multi-level parking structure to be build on the Phase II Site or the actual
structure ofthe State Office Building on the Phase II Site.
2. If on or before the date that is ten (10) years after the date of this Letter Agreement DGS
has not obtained all legislative authorizations and funding requirements and has not
commenced the actual construction of the State Office Building on the Phase II Site, the
Agency shall have the right to repurchase the Phase II Site for an amount equal to
$1,770,500.00 by indicating the intent of the Agency to so repurchase the Phase II Site
and to thereafter deposit with DGS the full amount of the purchase price. The Agency
must so state its intent to repurchase the Phase II Site and must deposit the repurchase
price with DGS at any time within ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of said ten (10)
year period of time. In the event the Agency does not so state its intent to repurchase the
Phase II Site and timely deposit of the repurchase price with DGS, this Letter Agreement
shall automatically be extended without any further action of the parties for an additional
period of time equal to ten (10) years. The purchase price reflects a reduction of
$911,000.00 from the amount paid by the State of California to the Agency to
compensate the City of San Bernardino for funds it expended on the design for an office
building on the Phase II Site.
3. In the event that the term of this Letter Agreement is automatically extended as provided
above, the Agency shall have the same opportunity to provide notice of intent to
repurchase the Phase II Site and to deposit with DGS the repurchase price in the event
DGS has not commenced the actual construction of the State Office Building prior to the
expiration of the extended term of this Letter Agreement. In the event the Agency does
. not so state its intent to repurchase the Phase II Site and timely deposit the repurchase
price with DGS by the date which is twenty (20) years after the date of this Letter
Agreement, this Letter Agreement shall automatically terminate as of the date which is
twenty (20) years from and after the date hereof except for the requirement of DGS to
properly maintain, repair and upkeep the landscaping of the Phase II Site which shall be
~~" ,'.."'........
MR. MICHAEL COURTNEY
May 10, 2001
Page Number 3
an obligation of DGS during the time that DGS, or any transferee or successor in interest,
continues to own the Phase II Site until the State Office Building and the required
parking structure are constructed thereon.
4. Except for a transaction structured to accomplish the construction of the State Office
Building, DGS agrees that during the term of this Letter Agreement and any extension
hereto, DGS shall not sell, lease or otherwise transfer the Phase II Site or allow for any
interim or permanent development thereon except for the State Office Building and
required parking structure as set forth above.
5. DGS agrees that on or before June 15, 2001, it shall submit landscaping conceptual
drawings to the Agency showing its intended landscaping improvements to the Phase II
Site. The Agency, in cooperation with the City of San Bernardino, agrees to submit
comments and suggested changes, if any, to the landscaping plans to DGS by June 30,
2001. Subject to the availability of funding, on or before September 1, 2001, DGS shall
commence the work of the installation and construction of the upgraded landscaping on
the Phase II Site and shall diligently complete such work within a reasonable period of
time thereafter. Such landscaping plans shall comply in all respects with the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Phase I and Phase II projects, and DGS
shall have no obligation to undertake and landscaping improvements that conflict with
said EIR, or to undertake any landscaping improvements which would necessitate the
preparation of any additional environmental analysis; however, DGS and the Agency
recognize that the landscaping contemplated by this paragraph is intended to be interim
landscaping and the Agency states that such landscaping is in compliance with the EIR.
The Agency and DGS acknowledge and agree that the contemplated landscaping
improvements shall consist of the Phase II Site being partially installed with grass to be
sodded in certain areas with other areas to be overplanted with wild flowers all in such
areas of the Phase II Site as shall be mutually agreed upon between DGS and the Agency
together with modifications to the irrigation system to properly irrigate the newly sodded
grass.
6. DGS shall continue to have the obligation to undertake the improvement and ongoing
maintenance, repair and upkeep of the Phase II Site in a satisfactory manner. Failure of
DGS to so properly improve, maintain, repair and provide for the upkeep of the Phase II
Site, to improve and upgrade the landscaping of the Phase II Site as required in this Letter
Agreement, and after delivery often (10) days' written notice by the Agency to DGS and
the failure of DGS to commence to cure such default and thereafter to satisfactorily
complete such cure within a reasonable period of time, the Agency shall thereupon be
permitted to either commence a legal action to compel the specific performance of the
improvement, maintenance, repair and upkeep obligations of DGS under this Letter
Agreement or to expend Agency funds to provide for the satisfactory improvement,
p,.",-"",,~.~~~- ------,--~
MR. MICHAEL COURTNEY
May 10,2001
Page Number 4
maintenance, repair and upkeep of the Phase II Site and to obtain reimbursement of all
such Agency costs and expenses, including administrative costs, plus interest thereon at
the highest rate allowable under State law. Such reimbursement by DGS shall be subject
to the availability of funds and, if necessary, compliance by the Agency with applicable
governmental claim procedures.
7. The Agreement between DGS and the Agency entitled "Amendment to Exchange
Agreement (Phase II Site/9th and Del Rosa)" dated as of August 23, 2000, is hereby
amended by changing the date of "December 30, 2000" as contained in Section I thereof
to "May 15, 2001, and such later date as may be necessary but not to exceed May 22,
2001."
8. The Agency agrees to provide DGS all designs and work product it prepared for the
buildings on the Phase II Site, and hereby assigns to DGS all right, title and interest of the
Agency in said plans and work product.
9. This Letter Agreement shall terminate upon the completion of the State Office Building
and required parking structure.
MR. MICHAEL COURTNEY
May 10, 2001
Page Number 5
All individuals executing this Letter Agreement represent and warrant that all actions have been
duly taken to properly approve and authorize the execution hereof by the undersigned and that
the individuals so executing this Letter Agreement are duly authorized to so execute on behalf of
DOS and the Agency, as applicable. This Letter Agreement has been duly approved and
executed by DOS and the Commission on behalf of the Agency as the date set forth above.
REDEVELOPMENT AOEN V OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERN 0
By:
Title:
By:
Title:
Approved as to form and
::1~
Agency Sp al Counsel
By:
Title:
L SERVICES
ORNIA
~r'
Title:
Approved as to form and
legal content:
By: ~ CI
Legal Counsel