HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-176
".'
....."",'..<-
'. .;;:~:r.a'!'~
,-
1
RESOLUTION NO. 7'1-17&t
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING AMEND-
MENT NO. 19 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
3 (GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT) .
4 WHEREAS, the General Plan Land Use Element for the City
5 of San Bernardino was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by
6 Resolution No. 7336 on August 17, 1964; and
7 WHEREAS, Amendment No. 19 to the General Plan of the City
8 of San Bernardino, amending the General Plan Land Use Element,
9 was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of San
10 Bernardino on March 6, 1979, after a legally advertised public
11 hearing; and
12 WHEREAS, a negative declaration, complete with an environ-
13 mental description form, relating to Amendment No. 19, has been
14 reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and the Mayor
15 and Common Council in accordance with the California Environmental
16 Quality Act and local regulations; and
17 WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council reviewed and con-
18 sidered Amendment No. 19 on March 19, 1979; and
19 WHEREAS, the adoption of Amendment No. 19 is deemed in the
20 interest of the orderly development of the City and important to
21 the health, safety and welfare of the City,
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON
23 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
24
SECTION 1. The General Plan Land Use Element of the City
25 of San Bernardino is amended in the area encompassing approximate-
26 ly 40 acres of land bounded on the west side by Meridian Avenue,
27 the east side by the railroad right-of-way, lying generally 600
28 feet south of Foothill Boulevard, northerly of Second Street as
-.
_.i:.'
-......'"
'''>'''''~;\- ;"~1,,...,";:.,
'" _...,,,<~JI:. ,"'
1
shown and outlined on the map entitled Exhibit "A", a copy of
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
The foregoing resolution is hereby
~
3
4
5
Bernardino at a
6
on the
1/^-
7
vote, to wit:
8
AYES:
9
10
NAYS:
11
ABSENT:
[2
13
[4
[5
of
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
day
/1~'J.o
of 7;;~
r:~:~~r-.
meeting thereof, held
, 1979, by the following
couJ~me~
A'<j
, <1? (It 11/
L/'?'Z /111 J' .-/
o~i'/l/,/.t/~;'l//
./ Ci ty Clerk
oA
L day
form:
FI
~ r:~'
.....c'",,;~ll t, :,;'"
i'/l.E~,Y .- S; ~
CiTY C~Z:~~:~S C. I ,-.' .
lll'..."". ...",.-"'.tl>l~."',""Ll""""''''''''''''' ,_,., DtFUI.
-2-
C!TV OF: SAN BERNARDINO
,
-
MEMORANDUM
To THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CO~~ON COUNCIL
Through Shauna Clark, City Clerk
Subject General Plan Amendment No. 19 -- Ward 3
(City Initiated Request)
From RONALD L. SMITH
Planning Director
Date March 7, 1979
Approved
Date
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on March 6, 1979, the following
recommendation was made:
That the General Plan Amendment No. 19, a proposal to evaluate a series of.
residential land use alternatives including mobile howes for 40 acres on the
east side of Meridian Avenue, 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard, was
recommended for approval of Alternative No.3 (8 to 14 units per acre) and
approval of Resolution No. PC-79-1 (see attached copies of Planning Report
Format and Resolution No. PC-79-1).
Another motion was made to approve the responses to comments and to adopt the
Negative Declaration which was reviewed and considered.
This item will be on the agenda for the Council meeting of March 19, 1979, at
7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino.
Cal ifornia.
~C1>-~~..t ~~
RONALD L. SMITH
Planning Director
fm
atts
A Reso 1 uti on of the Pl anni ng COIrrni ss i on of the Ci ty of San Bernardino Amendi ng
Specific Designations shown on the Land Use Element to the General Pl an (General
Plan Amendment No. 19).
FORM MOTION:
Motion to approve the responses to comments and to adopt the Negative Declaration
which was reviewed and considered.
That further reading of the resolution be waived and said resolution adopted.
C' T Y 0 r:~ r,.~ W=t'.H)~J-'i
(
(
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT FORMAT
March 6, 1979
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 19
Ward 3
Land Use Element Analysis, approximately 40 acres of 1 and on the east side
of Meridian Avenue, generally 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The
General Plan currently indicates "0" Open Space'and a golf course on the
property reflective of the old Sequoia Golf Course.
Site Location and Description: The subject area is presently zoned C-3A
limited General Commercial. The land had been utilized as a golf course,
however, the golf course is no longer in operation. It is assumed the
designation of golf course was shown on the General Plan because Sequoia
Golf Course was operational when the General Plan was adopted by the Plan-
ning Commission and the Hayor and Comnon Council.
Zoning and land use patterns surrounding the subject site are:
1. North--Zoned C-3A limited General Commercial. A 243 space mobile home park
'lies northerly of the subject site, fronting onto Foothill Boulevard. Density
of this project is 8.1 dwelling units per acre.
2. West--Zoned R-1-7200 Single Family Residential and R-3-1200 southwesterly.
To the west is a city park (Nicholson), and a City Fire Station (#9).
Northwesterly is a 19 unit detached single family residential development.
A 94 space mobile home park lies southwesterly of the property under consi-
derati on.
3. South--Zoned R-3-1200 and R-1-7200. Fronting along Meridian Avenue is an
apartment complex of 239 units on 14.78 acres. The density of this project
is 16.78 d~lelling units per acre. Further east the property is bounded by
the Pacific Electric Railway right-of-way.
4. East--Zoned C-3A Limited General Comnercial. The eastern boundary is a
200 foot wide Southern Pacific Transportation Company railroad right-of-
way.
Site History: Prior to December; 1960, the subject property was zoned R-1-
7200 Single Family Residential, and was lying fallow. In December of 1960,
the Mayor and Comnon Council approved of a zone change for 93 more or
less, acres, of which the subject property was a part, to tbQ r..]A lnn~
~~c;!ir8tf~ in anticipation of a regional shopping center proposed for the
site. A condition of approval was review of the zoning at the end of five
years by the Planning Comnission to determine the status of the project and
the merits of the zoning (Change of Zone No. 393). In December of 1961,
approval was granted by the Planning Comnission for the establishment of a
miniature golf course, driving range and nine hole course on the subject
(
t
Plan. Dept. Rept. Formt..
P. 2
1/6/79
Gen. Plan Amend. #19
property (Conditional Development Permit No. 238). Zoning was not changed,
thus the C-3A classification remains for the entire 93, more or less,
acre parcel.
Circulation: In reference to the General Plan for the area, Foothill Boule-
vard has an ultimate right-of-way designation of BO to 120 feet with an
existing right-of-way of 110 to 120 feet. ~Ieridian Avenue is projected to
have an ultimate.right-of-way of BO to 88 feet; existing right-of-way is
60 feet. Second Street, a local residential street which forms the southern
boundary of the subject property is a partially vacated street having an
existing right-of-way of 40 feet. The apartment complex utilizes Second
Street as a private drive; this arrangement was agreed upon by the City
Engineer and the Mayor and Conmon Council at the time of construction of the
apartment complex.
Additional Information: Applications are being considered by the Planning
Commission this evening for a 216 lot mobile home planned unit development.
Specifically, consideration is to be given the merits of a zone change from
the C-3A Limited General Conmercial designation to the mobile home park
desi gnation, and a conditional development permit and tentati vetract map for
the approval of the actua 1 physi ca 1 des i gn of a proposed mobil e home pl anned
unit development (PUD). Staff notes that compliance with the General Plan
is mandated by State Law prior to approval of a tentative or final subdivision
and that a conditional development permit cannot be approved unless it is deemed
to conform to the objectives of the city's General Plan and is in harmony thereto.
(See Ordinance No. 1991, Section 28).
Land Use Alternatives: A series of four alternatives have been prepared for
the area by the staff. Each proposal may be modified at the discretion of
the Planning Commission. No commerical or industrial designations are pre-
sented. The effects, environmentally, of either type of use in this area \~ould
be significant and would thus require extensive environmental review and the
preparation of an environmental impact report. Should the Planning Commission'
determine that either commerical or industrial use would be appropriate for
the area, the matter should be referred to the Environmental Review Committee
for appropriate study and action.
Alternative 1
No Change--This would entail a reaffirmation of the existing open space and
golf course designation shown on the General Plan.
It is noted the golf course is not in operation at the present time. Itis
questionable therefore, ~Ihether it is cor,reet to indi cate the area as an "existing"
golf course on the General Plan. Indicating the area as a proposed golf course
could be considered by the Planning COffinission. Presently, there is an existing
..
c.
(
P.lan. Dept. Rept. Formt.
P. 3
1/6/79
Gen. Plan Amend. #19
18 hol e pub 1 i c golf course located north of the Santa Ana Ri ver in south
San Bernardino. The Planning Commission and Mayor and Common Council have
recently approved another 18 hole public golf course in .the .Shandin Hills area
of San Bernardino. It is felt a golf course at this site could not compete
with the ex'isting and/or recently approved golf courses in San Bernardino.
While this is an assumption on the part of staff, development pressures do
support this.
Alternative 2
land Use
Acreage
Maximum Units
Average Daily Traffic
Medium-low density
(4-7 units per ac.)
This alternative would allow for the' development of typical single family
dwellin9s, a mobile home development, or low density planned unit development
on the entire site. Given the medium-high density designation (15-36 DU/net acre)
shown north of subject site, and the medium density designation (8-14 DU/net acre)
shown to the south, staff would be of the position that an incompatibility
would occur by indicating the medium-low designation for the area. Areas of
medi um-l ow density shoul d be sepa rated from hi gher density uses by lines of
clear demarcation (streets, flood channels, railroad lines, etc.) or by
buffers designed into specific developments. The latter method would be
difficult to achieve in this instance because of the need to provide the buffers
on not only the north and south side, but the east property line as well "due
to the railroad activity. Thus, open space provisions on the site would result
in a sacrifice of substantial amounts of useable land.
40
280
2,940
Alternative 3
land Use Acreage
Maximum Units
Average Daily Traffic
Medium density 40
(8-14 units per ac.)
560
3,920
This alternative would be compatible with the existing General Plan designations
shown surrounding the site, as well as existing land uses surrounding the site.
As in every density residential use proposed by staff in this area, measures
will be required to mitigate dwelling units from the railroad activities east
and south of subject site.
Access into the site would be controlled through site design to eliminate any
potential problems occurring along Meridian Avenue. Interior circulation
would be isolated from adjacent existing developments because of the physical
design and isolation built into each development. This \-lill not create traffic
problems; again, the only major concern would be controlled access onto Meridian
Avenue.
(
(
Plan. De~. Rept. Formt.
P. 4
1/6/79
Gen. Plan Amend. #19
A lterna ti ve 4
Land Use
Acre~
Maximum Un its
Average Daily Traffic
Medium high density
(15 to 36 units per ac.) 40
1,440
10 ,080
Staff would question the viability and need for this designation given the
existing developments in the area, and density patterns vii thin the general area.
It is noted that applying this residential density to the existing medium high
density shown immediately north of the subject site would yield approximately
3,000 maximum units, with an average daily traffic generation factor of 21,000.
Residential developments of this density should be confined to the area immediately
adjacent to the Central Business District where the infrastructure is available
or planned for. Further, not only would staff recommend this designation not
be shown for the subject site, but that the medium high designation shown north
of the site be further studied to determine its applicability given the existing
density of development of the mobile home park which is well below this density.
Overall Evaluation: Existing developments within the area do not conform to
the General Plan. No conmercia1 development has occurred along the south side
of Foothill Boulevard, east of t-leridian Avenue. The existing apartment complex
on the east side of Meridian Avenue, north of the railroad right-of-way exceeds
the designation as shown on the General Plan (16.78 DU/acre versus 14 DU/acre
shown on Pl an). The General Pl an does not recogni ze the rail road ri ght-of-way
\~hi ch exists on the eastern boundary of the subject site.
Additionally, zoning for the area bears no reasonable relationship to the
existing designations shown on the General Plan. In fact, zoning in this area
differs from land use; the mobile home park and the closed golf course are both
zoned C-3A.
It is recommended, therefore, that the study area be enlarged to include as
a boundary Foothill Boulevard on the north, Meridian Avenue-on the west and
the railroad rights-of-I'lay on the south and east. Consideration should be
-given to initiating zone changes in this area to bring zoning and land use
into harmony. Further consideration should be given to amend the General Plan
so that it would comply with zoning.
In reference to the specific site under consideration, staff would recommend
the medium density (8 to 14 DU/acre) designation be shown. The land is capable
of holding development at that density, and the infrastructure and circulation
system can adequately handle medium density development as well. It is felt
the only concern would be that of noise emanating from the railroad rights-of-way
along the eastern and southern boundaries of the subject site. This problem can
be overcome though, through the .establ ishment of buffer areas, walling and noise
attenuation measures, the combination of which could reduce any noise to an
acceptable level.
---.-------,
(
(
RESOLUTION NO. PC 79-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COt~ISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ANENDING SPECIFIC DESIGNATIONS SHOWN ON THE LAND USE ELE~IENT TO THE GENERAL
PLAN.
THE PLANNING CONMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOHS:
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission conducted a,
legally advertised and announced public hearing on an amendment to the
General Plan (General Plan Amendment No. 19) Land Use Element on March 6,
1979; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration complete with an Environmental Description
Form was reviewed and approved by the Comnission pertaining to said amendment
and in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission evaluated a series of variable land use
proposals set forth as Alternatives 1 through 4 attached to the official files
on said General Plan Amendment and encompassing approximately 40 acres of land
bounded on the west side by Meridian Avenue, the east side by the railroad
right-of-way, lying generally 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard, northerly
of Second Street; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.7 on July 7, 1964,
establishing a General Plan Land Use Element for the City of San Bernardino
which was subsequently adopted by the ~1ayor and Conmon Council via Resolution
7336, on August 17, 1964; and
WHEREAS, it is now deemed necessary to amend said Land Use Element to
reflect changed conditions as exemplified by the inactivity of the golf course
and modify the existing golf course designation shown for this area of the City
of San Bernardino pertaining to the General Plan Land Use Element; and
lmEREAS, Alternative No. ~ (setting forth residential uses //1;; ,/1).
~t; Au.y ~~ lis considered to reflect the current long range aspects
of the ~rea in relationship to the General Plan Land Use Element.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING CO~~ISSION OF 'THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO hereby adopts Resolution No. PC 79-1 and recommends to the
Mayor and Common Council adoption of Alternative No. .,3 ,via resolution
pertaining to General, Plan Amendment No. 19.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of San
Bernardino considers it necessary for the General Plan to be a flexible docu-
ment subject to periodic change to recognized contemporary development trends
and objectives of the City of San Ilernardino.
~
(
(
Res. #PC 79-1
P. 2
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the Cfty of San Oernardino at a regular meeting on
the 6th day of March, 1979, by the following vote, to wit:
A YES: )j..,~I!~!~I-.J-Pr.?~t:'!.I )-.k2~1!.-y -)-13,1.h"'~r-'B ;j!4~
Y. .;/ -,~ ~ _. __ -+ -/ -r--c .
~.t,;':C-') !- ~~_~e.'-1.--
NAYS: >t~ t
ABSENT: ~__~(.
. .-.-- . L~ J
1-A-~//2- . .~
FRANCES MOFFATT, Secre ary
Planning Commission
The foregoing resolution is hereby adopted this 6th day of March, 1979.
, \ I I _ (~("_:"\ ..1
"IJ ,,,ffi,,... . '.~)..h<-Lc\.<" c:
DR. \~ALTER C. SCHUILING(\Chairman
Planning Commission 0
, ,'V rrJ U' L 'i(,T'
'. :""~ \~n~ rl~ R-I
: ::,~ "'\ /- 11 R-I
i' :" : "\ LR-I,
R-I
'." J:l'
I, I
I I,
11
I;
r
I
I
\
. .
Y' , .
I
" ,
~ "0"
~ "
,
~ !~~ I .'" ". ......' - .
l ~~0.'\.~'''I-IA J\. "'>,',J .;.,'.
-, ~ ~, .
~ ".
. ,
.
"0"
,
,
~
Mo" \
"0"
,
"aU
"
"'
2
,"0"
, '.
, .
--
R-I
~!'-
'1;~
),~,,,
" ,
Rt' , ,\
\\
R-'
,
t---R_I --
U R -, JL R-'
R- I !
AVE.
-,
~
R-'
R-I
'--
l'
R-I
s,,=r;
R-'
?"~EL~
..
R-Io 0
o ': c; 2
-' z -'
: w t::
""' .
Z W %W ...
C '> <~ z"
-'~IfI-C"'iC"'>
", .
!!:: '>'; 0'"
[ R-I ') ~,~
. tiT ""
',r-- 19
~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.
ALTERNATIVE 3
RESIDENTIAL
~IEDIur1 DEflSITY
(8-14 DU/ ACRE)
C-3A J 7[:::j;11 C-3A
BLVD.
/' l
'::fr R-I
I R-J
~~. .
I .",. If",:::
r~, "", I;
I ' I , "
EJ C''J~ R-J ~ R-I r~
. R-3-3000 ;t ~r"" '''::
" ,R-Ilr Q ~"/' '"..1:
',R-I '~~C_M ~R-2 / R-?
11'~-3kOij ~ I ,
~-~.~,~ I ,'--
R-I
-
R-'
R-'
\
R-I
R-I
R-I
'L >
R-I R-I ~
- R-I R-3
'"
I
cr. R-I R-3
R-I
"'
>
R-' .
"
'"
c- 3A "
.
.,
\
1\ C -3A
C-3A
dOT HILL
C-'
.111 R-I
"'31'\
~
R-I
R-I
C-3A
AV,
" .:
C-3A
. '
. ,
J' : " !
' ,
j i" <
o:~
N
-'
'L" R-'
Jr- SCHOOL
- 1
I
0:
R-I
.
, . ~
, "0"
. . T
I C-3A
l
. ;/ C'3A~'
T
-
. ' ,
I R-I
~
. 101-1 A
,
,
- I i
,
! ,
, .
R-l
"'0"
\
.;
>
~
I
,
,.
..
" '"
~
.
~
I
C-3A 1
L
CoM
10\'1
l'
CoM
~
R -I
~
"0"
,
r C~3A //
~
~~frl
~'d\ ~ = ~;
~}: \ 101-2.
1\
J: 101-1
, ,
M - g' I ''0'
.~ '
I ..
,Ct:
1\~1
~ M-I'
r\~; M-I
~ M-I
M-I
I C-MAl'
f---:t"A ''I_I I [
'~~..~
I
I
I
I
I
~.'\
-
,"'c,"
\ \:::- ,-
~
! .~"""'''''I'I'''
T~
~ G::
N
\"",,,"
,
.."
,
R-I
o
'\ :
~ "0""
~"'1
. ~ :~~
0-'
'L ~ ~-IA
z ~,~
~-
. .
-
I
'"
R-I
u
R-I
110"
R-I
'--
Ir-
'C"OOL
I' .. \..
,
~
II
~R-I
. ~"'- n
;'~ ~
"0" ~
,
,
, .' ..'
.
"OIl
>
M-I A
~. I
-\
1\ "V,'
" ,
. , ~ I .
'. .' .";
.
"c;"
\
R-'
. .
T
C-3A
.Ast INE
.
',:V
./ ,
C-3A ~i
T
.-
R-'
-
,
110"
<<
"'
2
.' -l
.
,110" .
,
M-IA
\. ".
AVE
~ ';..,
'\'.".~,
o' .
O' ......;':-
. '.,..
f'! ~I~:i,i~~~~-
z,w Zw ct. 1
J JUL l~ ~~J)~~ I
I R-' ' ') ->.'V 0" ,\
In /"\. \\
C GENERAL PLAr~ AHENDMENT NO. 19
"
,
I :
--
R-I
R-I
- --
f R- I
/.
R-f,
R-I
R -I
IL
I
R-I
R-I
'--
R-'
R - I
R-I
R-I
(;5tv<<ELe"'
..
...
...
-A
R -I
;=n;
"d'
---J
R-'
R -I
R-I
\
,
R-I
R-I
R-I
m
I
"'::l
,.;
>
~
R-I
-
.,
,
,
R-f
R-3
R-3
"'
>
~
ALTERNATIVE 1
NO CHANGE
EXISTING GOLF COURSE
"0.1
R-'
>-
..
- ;;
.
..
R-I
~
C-3A
C - 3A
J
J
.
o
C-3A
~
I L /11 C-3A
ILVD.
C -3A
C-3A
1
C-~
~~-2 r::-r
"""' ~ ~
I\d' ~ ~
,,~ \ M-2.
JOT HILL
.~..~. .... .
I
~fl R-I \1
I ,R-I
.
T~ R-I
ll:
:~' c- 3A ~~
~":." I~I
r I '. r' I I I
~ "\'~-I 0
~ R-I . f
;; '/"/ R-r"" ...::
./ ~ ....l...
1
':1
~II R-t
R-I
..~~11:j ~:i\. ,
. ."~' ."t6.fk ~
. .
,
ll:
COM
""9'
~
,~, S,.
'.f/.
~M-t
,..-:;
~ M-I'
\, M-I ,.
\ \u M-I
,,1-1
I R-3
I'
8
R -3.
, ,
M-~', 1''0'
C-3A
"
T'
M-I
R-I
R -2
.
.
. 0
C-M ~'::'.JA
I C-M~['
,~-l II
.~
~-n
C-3A
\ R-I .~
jl~-ja-oo
R-I
'.,-~
R-I' r
C-M ~
~IR-2/
~-- -, !
AV
C-3A
\
"
".---
~-_._-
c
R-I
R-I
~
R-I
R-I
J ,R-I-
)~
R-I
R-I
\
,
R-I
-
'"
I
"'
R-I
R-I
C-3A
:>OThllL
C-I
~II R-I
R-I
I R-3
I
EJ
,
, ,21
R- I ,
leI..
R-3-3000
,..:-
R-I
~
.
-11
I
I
\ "
.....-- -~
.~ ~,,~ nJ u "m'::~
" \ '-.'-', - .:f
...... . T1 0
, ~ :,' .'. i 11 R-I
I' : '. : '\ ~-I
. .. R-I
. "l
.
I <
. E "'~
,
N I
LU R-I
ro- . CHO OL
,
,
-
I
'"
R-I
,
< )'
-, '.
"0"
'.
- .
.
~
. ..
(J
,
,"Oil
. . ~
. 110"
T
. I ,
! C-3A
'r C-3 A ~;
T .
-
. ,
I R-I
'---.
M-IA
,
1
- I
! ,
.
l R-I.
,
"
I
R -I
I
"0"
, ,
I..-J ,
~ --
R- I
UI R-I JL
--
R-I
R- I
AVE
R-I
r.:r[vcEL~
..
R-IO O~"
o ~ 2 ",
3, ~ ~~ +
z w ZW .
~I ~ ~ ~~ :~
~~.
I
L
~
I
\
.;
>
c
I "0'.
I
,.
W
~
.,
c
~
,
R-I
\Y oq.'"
n ') ,.r.:'"
\\
R-I
GENERAL PLAN AMENrn~ENT NO. 19
AL TERNA TI VE 2
RES I DENTIAL
MEDIUM LOW DENSITY
(4-7 DU/ ACRE)
C-3A I U C-3A , , \ C~3A
BL.VD.
I
"" i:r
.., R-I
l=-
ii ,R - I ~,:: c- M ~
.0 ~
-,-;1 R-I .1 ~t
ll: ,R-I b M-I'
~ <<<\<<:: C-3A I~' R-I R~/A~"\\ M-I
:-:-:-:':-:':-:'>:-:J>' ' \l M-I
""'''''''' ,
j::~:~,',' ",.:,- U-'T
R-I I r a.) ~ . ....,.. AVE
C-M ~ I "R-2
~/ R-2
~ .','
f-"' '" I
R-I
R-I
'"
R-3 ~
R-I c
R-3 ~
~
C - 3A ~
.
0
C-3A
C-3A' //
~
~r;,j:2 r:-i :1
--- ..J 2 .
~ ~
,. ~
I'd -' ... L..:
1\" ;-2
~2\
1
C'J A
"'-1
R -3,
,
M-g': 1''0'
M-I
c.~~
R-I
I C-MAI
.~-l I!
~--'~
" ., ,,' 11
~..j <'J~
,
,
, '
COM
C-3A
r--;--
, 1111
. II .
" . .
~ . ,
. I
l-
I-
"
7T". -A
1 R-I
II
-
R=r.
.. R-I
R-I
R-I F_
J R-I
)~
R-I
R-I
\
R-I
R-I
L
~
-
R.-I
Q
I
R-I
C-3A
lOT HIL l
j;
C-I
R-I
R-I
I R-3
I I
1""=' ,-,
R-I ,~
1, r;.:Q-~
R-I '
.....-~.-
L
"'34 ';'~I R-I \
I-
~, I . R-I \ ..
a:
-d R-I ?>
'"
"all
~
...
2
r-- --
R- I
U, R-I
IL
R- I
R-I
?(V",n~
..
R-I
I~
>
R-I ~
;1
R-3
R-I
R-3
'"
C - 3A
"
"
4
'0
R -3,
..
>
..
I
C.3A
..
..
-'
-'
<.
o
R-I
r
C-M ~
~R-21
---
I I
""""C':'3A ~/
-, ~
lJi:2 .-- rr-j
---~S ~ ~
.~ \ 101-2 ",
C-MAr
CoM ~<"A ."_1 If
--~.'~
\':0_\
',: 0,
, .
.. .._~~g ~tn:~:
. - '< I
.. '.. "
I
: .=,'- .. ',~. ~I. ";'
'0" \ \~ a:
o ... _ - .. .. "\.
"0" '- '-
..
R -I
,
'.
.
~
"olt
,
..
I '
!
or'
, ,
. ..
--
R-I
19 I
.;
>
..
I "0"
,
>-
...
"
"
.
~
C-3A
i ~!j C-3A
BLVO.
C-3A
C-3A
1.
C-Iol
L
M-t
R-I
,R-~
"-"I~ ,.,
'~?
101-'
M-II
..
~. 101-1
'W 101"
I; IH
C-3A
-I
l-
I
AV ,
R -2
"
. .
C -,3 A
\
.
,"--
..
N
J'
z
"'~
u
R-I
;::.
ICHO OL
R-'
T
C-3A
C-3 A ~'
-I..
R-I
-
,.r
Iol-g" ,''0'
.;