HomeMy WebLinkAbout32-Planning & Building
TT III
CITY OF SAN BERNftmINO - REQUEST F~ COUNCIL ACTION
From: AI Boughey, Director
Subject:
Parcel Map No. 14712 and Development Permit II
No. 94-19
Dept: Planning & Building Services
Date: February 20, 1995
MCC Date: February 20, 1995
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
The Mayor and Common Council previously approved the Tri-City Land Use Plan and Design Guidelines
on July 6, 1993.
Recommended Motion:
That the hearing be closed; the Negative Declaration adopted; and Parcel Map No. 14712 and
Development Permit II No. 94-19 be approved.
~DMlt~ . .,- .~.~:r.CEA
9 FEB cr., i..: 00
hLP~
-€o- AI Boughey
Contact person: Al Boughey
Phone: 384-5357
Supporting data attached: Staff Reoort
Ward: #1
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: $30.00
FinanC~~~
Source: Need F&G Fee No.
#772-171-24515
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. ~;J..
1'X-N-1f
I I II'
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION.
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 14712 AND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (TYPE III)
NO. 94-19
REQUEST/LOCATION: To subdivide parcels 6 and 7, and a portion of parcels "A" and "B", of
Parcel Map No. 13910 to provide a .81 acre parcel for a 25,000 square foot Bally's Holiday Spa Health
Club located on the north side of Hospitality Lane between the eastern and western termini of Carnegie
Drive in the CR-3, Commercial Regional, Tri-City/Club land use designation.
KEY ISSUES: The key issues are as follows:
o On July 6, 1993 the Mayor and Common Council adopted the Tri-City Land Use Plan
and Design Guidelines through Development Agreement No. 92-01. This land use plan
regulates land use, phasing of development, landscaping, etc.
o Since the request will both increase the number of buildings, and the number of lots, as
identified in the land use plan the Mayor and Common Council are the review authority
as identified in Sections 12.4.2 and 12.4.3 of the Tri-City Land Use Plan and Design
Guidelines.
o The creation of a new lot will change the number of lots proposed for the Tri-City area
and also delete a portion of a proposed parking garage as identified in the land use plan.
However, sufficient parking is to be included in the development of this site.
o The Tentative Parcel Map will create a .81 acre parcel while the Development Permit
ensures that the development of a 25,000 square foot Bally's Holiday Spa Health Club
meets the standards established by the Tri-City Land Use Plan and Design Guidelines.
Please see the analysis and attachments contained in Exhibit 2, Staff Report to the Planning
Commission.
ENVffiONMENTAL: An Initial Study was prepared for Development Permit (Type II) No. 94-19,
by Staff, and was presented to the Development and Environmental Review Committee (D/ERC) on
November 3, 1994 (see Attachment I of the Staff Report). The ERC determined that the project would
not have an adverse impact upon the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
recommended that included mitigation measures as identified in the Tri-City Land Use Environmental
Impact Report. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was available for public review from
November 10, 1994 to November 30, 1994. No comments were received during the public review
period. Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (Class 15 Exemption).
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed Tentative
Parcel Map No. 14712 and Development Permit (Type II) No. 94-19 on January 24, 1995, and voted
8-0 to recommend to the Mayor and Common Council; adopt the Negative Declaration based upon the
I I 111
.
.
PM 14712 & DPI194-19
Mayor and Common Council meeting of
February 20, 1995
Page 2
attached Findings of Fact (Attachment F of the Staff Report). Commissioners present: Affaitati, Cole,
Gonzales, Kipp, Melendez, Stone, Strimpel and Traver.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration, and;
2. Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 and Development Permit (Type II) No. 94-19.
Prepared by: Scott D. Donaghe, Assistant Planner
For: Al Boughey, Director, Planning and Building Services
EXHmITS: 1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Staff Report
Attachments:
A. Location Map - included as Exhibit 1
B - Tentative Parcel Map
C - Site Plan
D - Elevations
E - Development Code and General Plan Consistency
F - Findings of Fact
G - Conditions of Approval
H - Standard Requirements
I - Initial Study
doc:OOIl14(lldd)
II II'
.
.
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
HEARING DATE
...
I.
, --~
.'
- ,
..
friLl""
u..
L
~I
c
~
\l-tz.1 ~.
~:-r.~
v
EXHIBIT 1
crnrl___
---
Pl.AN-8.11 PAGE' OF 1 (4-80)
II I'll
.
SUMMARY
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION.
===============================================
CASE:
PARCEL MAP NO. 14712 AND
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT II NO. 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1-24-95
WARD: #1
APPLICANT:
Rancon Fund V
27720 Jefferson Ave.
Temecula, CA 92590
OWNER:
Same
===============================================
REQUEST / LOCATION _ To subdivide parcels 6 and 7, and a portion of parcels "A" and "B", of Parcel Map
No. 13910 to provide a .81 acre parcel for a 25,000 square foot Bally's Holiday Spa Health Club located on the north
side of Hospitality Lane between the eastern and western tennini of Carnegie Drive in the CR-3. Commercial
Regional, Tri-City/Club land use designation.
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY
SUBJECT
NORTH
EAST
WEST
SOUTH
ExISTING
LAND USE
Vacant
Vacant (Future Office)
Offices
Vacant (Future Parking Structure)
Vacant (Future Offices)
LAND USE
DESIGNATION
CR-3, Comm. Regional, Tri-City/Club
CR-3, Comm. Regional, Tri-City/Club
CR-3, Comm. Regional, Tri-City/Club
CR-3, Comm. Regional, Tri-City/Club
CR-3, Comm. Regional, Tri-City/Club
GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC YES [J FLOOD HAZARD YES [J I SEWERS: I ~~S~ I
HAZARD ZONE: NO . ZONE: NO .
HIGH FIRE HAZARD YES [J AIRPORT YES [J REDEVELOPMENT YES.
ZONE: NO . NOISE/CRASH NO . PROJECT AREA: NO [J
ZONE:
ENVlRONMENT AL F1NDlNGS:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
o Not Applicable
. Exempt
(parcel Map)
. No Significant
Effects
(Dev. Permit II)
o Potential Effects,
Mitigating
Measures,
No E.I,R.
o E.I.R. wi Significant
Effects
. APPROVAL
. CONDITIONS
o Significant Effects,
SeeAt~ched E.R.C.
Minutes
o DENIAL
o CONTINUANCE
TO:
EXHIBIT 2
II III
.
.
PM 14712 & DPll 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1124/95
Page 1
REQUEST
""
The applicant requests approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 and Development Permit
(Type IT) No. 94-19, under authority of Code Sections 19.66.070 and 19.44, to subdivide
portions of four lots into a .81 acre pad to house a single story 25,000 square foot Bally's
Holiday Spa Health Club (see Attachment B, Tentative Parcel Map).
LOCATION
The site is a rectangularly shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately .81 acres located
on the northern side of Hospitality Lane between the eastern and western termini of Carnegie
Drive in the CR-3, Commercial Regional Tri-City Club land use designation. (see Attachment
A, Location Map).
BACKGROUND
On July 6, 1993 the Mayor and Common Council adopted the Tri-City Land Use Plan and
Design Guidelines through Development Agreement No. 92-01. The purpose of this document
was to formalize existing standards that had been used for development on various Tri-City sites.
The Land Use Plan and Design Guidelines regulate land use, phasing of development,
landscaping and etc. By creating and conforming to this plan the applicant can be assured of
a unified, quality development. Through adoption of the Development Agreement, Land Use
Plan and the Design Guidelines the Mayor and Common Council determined that Development
Agreement No. 92-01 was consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
The Land Use Plan also has an associated map. The map identifies building locations, sizes,
parking areas, general uses, etc. The Development Agreement portion of this document
identifies methods for making changes to this plan. Sections 12.4.2 and 12.4.3, of the Tri-City
Land Use Plan and Design Guidelines, require review by the Planning Commission and the
Mayor and Common Council when changes in the number of buildings or lots are proposed.
DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712
Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 is subject to Chapter 19.30 of the City of San Bernardino
Development Code. Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 has been reviewed and found to be
consistent with the provisions of the Development Code and in conformance with the General
Plan. (Attachment E, Conformance Table).
II II'
.
.
PM 14712 &. DPII 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1/24/95
Page 2
Development Permit (l'ype Il) No. 94-19
Development Permit (Type II) NO. 94-19 is subject to the Tri-City Land Use Plan and Design
Guidelines. The Tri-City Land Use Plan allows for a variety of uses ranging from commercial
uses to administrative and professional offices. Health clubs are included as a permitted use in
the CR-3, Commercial Regional, Tri-City Club land use district. The proposed health club
meets all of the development standards (height, setbacks, etc.) as identified in the Tri-City Land
Use Plan (see Attachment E, Conformance Table).
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT STATUS
An Initial Study was prepared for Development Permit (Type II) No. 94-19, by Staff, and was
presented to the Development and Environmental Review Committee (D/ERC) on November 3,
1994 (see Attachment I, Initial Study). The ERC determined that the project would not have
an adverse impact upon the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
recommended that included mitigation measures as identified in the Tri-City Land Use
Environmental Impact Report. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was available for
public review from November 10, 1994 to November 30, 1994. No comments were received
during the public review period. Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 is Categorically Exempt from
the California Environmental QualIty Act (Class 15 Exemption).
ANALYSIS
Proposal
The objective of the proposed subdivision is to create a commercial parcel, of approximately .81
acres to house a 25,000 square foot health spa. The proposed building has been reviewed by
the Development Review Committee and the proposed development meets the Tri-City Land Use
Plan and Development Code requirements, with respect to area, access, setbacks, etc. (see
Attachment C, Site Plan). The DRC recommended approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712
and Development Permit (Type IO No. 94-19 .
Site and Area Characteristics
The site is relatively flat and is bordered by other commercial lots along Hospitality Lane.
Surrounding land uses include offices directly to the east and southwest, and vacant land that has
been identified for future office development.
Access
All lots created by Parcel Map No 14712. will have direct access to a public street. The new
- I II 11'
.
.
PM 14712 & DPII 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1/24/95
Page 3
parcel will take its access from Hospitality Lane. Therefore, the design of the subdivision will
not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision.
Tri-City Land Use Plan
Originally, the Tri-City Land Use Plan map identified the proposed site to house a portion of
a parking structure and a movie theater. This application would further split the lots, increasing
the number of lots in the Land Use Plan, and creating a new building not identified in the
current Land Use Plan. The Tri-City Land Use Plan text states that the Planning Commission
shall be the decision making body when a request for an increase or decrease in the number of
lots, or buildings has been initiated.
COMMENTS RECEIVED
No comments have been received regarding this project as of the writing of this staff report.
CONCLUSION
Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 and Development Permit (Type II) No. 94-19 conform to the
General Plan and standards as set forth in the Development Code. There is a proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration.
I I II r
.
.
PM 14712 & DPII 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1/24195
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION
"
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the Mayor and
Common Council to:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration, and;
2. Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 and Development Permit ([ype II) No. 94-19,
based on the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment F) and subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval (Attachment G) and Standard Requirements (Attachment H).
~#
Assistant Director of Planning & Building Services
SCOTI D. DONAG
Assistant Planner
Attachments:
A - Location Map
B - Tentative Parcel Map
C - Site Plan
D - Elevations
E - Development Code and General Plan Consistency
F - Findings of Fact
G - Conditions of Approval
H - Standard Requirements
I . Initial Study
doc:000983(odd)
II II'
em' OF SAN BERN.INO .
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
Date 11- 2. )-9'2...
Adopted 6-2-89
Panel No. I2
,. --~
- 0
,U,IT' u..
L_
I.
"IN....
I
1
c.~..5 ~~
o
)
~
ATIACHMENT A
.
I
I
i)!'
I
ATIACHMENT B
I
m
...
II III
. eo ~
! ca Ii
= ..... .
= .! I
. .
. ala i
: I
. i
. . I
15= -I
0:: a.
.";: .
.. .
I~ i! :
:. fL I
..
.-- .
.:=, I
.-=_1
.:.... ..
. .
. .
.
. .
. ...i
~ -,
.. "I
! I%!
! ~ I
fL
.
.
I'll
@ [ ;i I~ I! IE'! I!m
f. I!.. Iq;
I~ I: ~ .~
I II Iii HI"
- !I
i ·
.
;
, .
.'r."
;r'"
~1~~
v
"
'.:.:
, -'~
. f;
"l"~
.. ':~.
~.
"'.
f";'
:~ ~
.~
ATIACHMENT C
a:l
;:;,
...:l
to)
~::c
rolE-<
ro...:l
:z:<
Iolr.:l
t.l::C
: <~
...
<C Po. t'!
Ill: 00 !il
o ~
: >- ~
~ :~
-=
>-...:l
roo
-
t.l::C
I
-00
Ill: .
foo>-
...:l
...:l
<
a:l
IXl
~
...:I
U
:l:l
E-o
I Ill...:l
I i ~ IlQ
...<
Z~
I Ji 1lQ:l:l
u. ~. U
II: II:
0 1lQ<'"
- 0 ... ~
.. -c1l.5 ; I~
.. ..
.. .. Illrn~ ~
. .. III
.. . o II
. .. "'>011 III
. :<~
.
..
.. .
.. .. UQ
0 . >0-
.
......:1
-0
U
,:l:l
-
Illrn
...
>0
...:I
...:I
<
IXl
.
ATIACHMENT D
II II'
.
.
lI:
o
..
..
.
II
..
II
..
..
..
o
..
.
z
o
..
..
..
II
..
II
..
..
II
..
---I
al
~
..
u
=
E-o
=..
IlQ
'" -<
zr&l
104=
.,
104
'"
-<
=
o
c.
=>-
0<
.,~
<!2
o
>0-
","
-0
.,
1=
-
=tI'J
'"
>-
..
..
<
al
IT 11'
I I TTf
.
.
PM 14712 & DPII 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1124/95
Page 10
ATIACHMENT E
DEVELOPMENT CODE CONFORMANCE TABLE .'
Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712 I Development Permit (Type In No. 94-19
CATEGORY PROPOSAL DEV. CODElTRI GENERAL PLAN
CITY LAND
USE PLAN
Use Commercial Permitted N/A
Subdivision (Health
Spa)
Gross Parcel Area
Parcel #1 .81 acres (approx. min. 10,000 square N/A
35,283 square feet) feet
Front Setback Approx. 75 feet 20 feet N/A
Side and Rear N/A N/A N/A
Setbacks
Parking 173 spaces proposed 125 spaces required N/A
Landscaping 24 % proposed 15% required N/A
ATTACHMENT E
II III
.
.
PM 14712 &. DPn 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1/24/95
Paso 11
ATfACHMENT F
FINDINGS OF FACT
Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712
1. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, in that the proposal conforms to
the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan.
2. The design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, in that the
proposal conforms to the standards specified for the CR-3, Commercial Regional Tri-City
Club land use designation.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development, in that the lots created meet
the minimum lot standards specified by the Development Code in terms of area and
access.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, in that the site
is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposed parcel in compliance with all minimum
Development Code lot standards.
S. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage,
or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat in that the
development proposed as a result of this subdivision is not located in a biologically
sensitive area.
6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems, in that
all lots created have direct access to a public street and are provided with public utilities.
7. The desl&n of the subdivision will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public
at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.
Development Permit (Type J1) No. 94-19
1. The proposed use is permiued within the Ci.-3, Commercial Regional Tri City Club land
use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code,
including prescribed development standards and design guidelines.
2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, in that it meets the goals,
objectives and policies of the General Plan.
3. The health club will be harmonious and ~.tibte with existing and future developments
ATTACHMENT F
II 'II
.
.
PM 14712 & DPll 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1/24/95
Pale 12
with the land use district and general area, as well as with the land uses presently on the
subject property, in that it is surrounded by vacant land and similar cbmmercial service
uses.
4. The approval of the Development Permit for the proposed development is in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030 (6) of the
Development Code, in that a Negative Declaration has been prepared in which all
adverse impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
5. There will be no potential significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and
natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored, in that all
significant negative impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
6. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use' being
proposed in that it meets the standards set forth by both the Development Code and
General Plan.
7. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public facilities
and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health
and safety, in that utilities are already provided to the site and access has been reviewed
and determined to be adequate by the Department of Public Works.
8. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed development
would not be detrimental to the public interest, health. safety, convenience, or welfare
of the City, in that the conditions of approval, standard requirements and negative
declaration will reduce any negative impact to a level of insignificance.
111 1'!1
.
.
PM 14712 &. DPn 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1/24/95
Pap 13
ATIACHMENT G
CONDmONS OF APPROVAL FOR "
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 14712 & DEVEWPMENT PERMIT (TYPE m
NO. 94-19
pLANNING DIVISION
1. Within two years of this approval, the filing of the final map or parcel map with the
Council shall have occurred or the approval shall becOme null and void. Expiration of
a tentative map shall terminate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map shall be
filed without first processing a new tentative map. The City Engineer must accept the
final map or parcel map documents as adequate for approval by Council prior to
forwarding them to the City Clerk. The date the map shall be deemed filed with the
Council is the date on which the City Clerk receives the map. The review authority
may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good
cause, grant an extension to the expiration date pursuant to Section 19.66.170 of the
Development Code and the State Map Act.
Project: Tentative Parcel Map No. 14712
Expiration Date: January 24, 1997
2. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction shall have
occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after
commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the
permit/approval shall become null an void. Projects may be built in phases if
preapproved by the review authority. If a project is built in preapproved phases, each
subsequent phase shall have one year from the previous phase's date of construction
commencement to have occurred or the permit/ approval shall become null and void.
Project: DPII 94-19
Expiration Date: January 24. 1997
3. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration
date and for good cause. grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review
authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code
provisions.
4. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter.
Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its
officers, agents and employees from llIlY claim, action. or proceeding against the City
ATTACHMENT G
II I'll
.
.
PM 14712 & DPll 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1/24/95
Page 14
of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and
attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay'as a result of such
action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligation under this
condition.
5. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development
Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 (Ploperty
Development Standards), and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and
grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other fonns of air
pollution; glare control; exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor control;
screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and vibration control.
Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied
with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transfonners, boxes, ducts, or meter
cabinets shall be architecturally screened by a wall or structural element, blending with
the building design and include landscaping when on the ground. A sign program for
all new commercial, office and industrial centers of three or more tenant spaces shall be
approved by the Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
This requirement also includes any applicable Land Use District Development Standards
for commercial developments regarding minimum lot area, minimum lot depth and width,
minimum setbacks, maximum height, maximum lot coverage, etc.
6. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied
or no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business
commenced as authorized by this pennit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the
Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is rued
with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy. The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and
completion of all tenns, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended
use by this permit.
7. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the landowner shall file a
maintenance agreement or covenant and easement to enter and maintain, subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The agreement or covenant and easement to enter and
maintain shall ensure that if the landowner, or subsequent owner(s), fail to maintain the
required/installed site improvements, the City will be able to file an appropriate lien(s)
against the property in order to accomplish the required maintenance.
8. The developer is w submit a complete maSler landscape and irrigation plan (5 copies) for
II I'll
.
.
PM 14712 &. DPIl 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HiAlUNG DATE: 1124/95
Pap 15
the entire development to the Public Works Department with the required fee for review.
The landscape plans will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation and Communil}' Services
and the pIanning Division for review. (Note: the issuance of a building dtvelopment
permit, by the Department of Planning and Building Services, does HQI! waive this
requirement. No grading permit(s) will be issued prior to approval of landsctpe plans.
The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for
Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department), and comply with all
applicable provisions of Chapter 19.28 (Landscaping Standards) of the ~elopment
Code effective on the date of approval of this permit. Trees are to be inspected by a
representative of the Parks Department prior to planting.
Plant materials shall be consistent with the Plant Palette in the Tri-City Land Use Plan
and Design Guidelines.
9. Neither grading nor building permits shall be issued until applicant has provided Staff
with a revised land use map as it appears in the Tri City Land Use and Design
Guidelines document.
10. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy applicant shall show compliance with the
Mitigation Monitoring Plan as specified in Mitigation Monitoring Plan associated with
Development Agreement No. 92-01.
11. A sign permit shall be required for all proposed signage. Signage shal1 be consistent
with the Tri-City Land Use Plan and Design Guidelines.
12. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirelnents of the
following City Departments or Divisions:
a. Fire Department
b.
Building Services Division of the Planning and Building Services
ent
c. Public Works (Engineering) Department
I I,
. p ,u-~ 'H,,v,/.R'I
!? /1;'JC ON r/A r-;;
/1> Ii ,t t 1 ~ /~". 7" , "
-'
II II
_~;?/( 1:. rT
CASE J)rp-rr-:
9f/-/9
CITY
OF
SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
HEARING DATE
REVIEWED BY ,J?/tf
,.
'"
FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS
GE~lER'\L REQt:IREMENTS:
i1 Provide one extra set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time oC plan check.
Contact Fire Deolllrtment for specific or detailed requirements - IMPORTANT.
The developer shall provide for adequate Fire Flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Fire Flow shall be based
on square rootage. construction features and exposure information 85 supplied by the developer and may be taken from two
hydrants. $"J('P 6,,1..J P If) c ......S 0((.11.; ,/OA.l /; .ra 6'/# (fJ .z.u ,xl,
ACCESS:
[I Provide two different routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, all-weather.
[J Provide an access roadway to each building: for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface
of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width.
f J Extend roadway to within ISO-feet of all portions o( the exterior 'Jalls of all single-story buildings.
[I Extend roadwav to within 50-(eet of the exterior walls of all multiple-story buildings.
[I Provide "No P"ARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less
than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" (All caps). "M.C. Sec. 15.16".
t I Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500-feet in length and shall have a minimum 35-foot radius turnaround.
[1 The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval.
SITE,
[I All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction.
oK Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than l5o-feet from the curb line. No fire hydrant
should be within 40-feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Barrel type, with one 2i-inch and one 4-ineh outlet,
anrj approved by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants are to be protected from damage by providing suitable traffie barrien.
The area around the fire hydrant shall be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by painting an I-inch wide, red stripe for IS-feet
in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles. Suitable "NO
PARKING" signs are required.
}>< Public fire hydrants shall be provided along streets at 30o-feet intervals for commercial and multi-residential ar_ and at
500-feet intervals (or residential areas. Installation shall conform to City specifications and be installed prior to combustible
construction or storage.
BUILDING'
)0< The address of the structure, in six inch numerals. shall be instaUed on the building or in other approved location In such a
manner as to be visible from the (rontage street. The color of the numbers shall contrast with color o( the background.
(J Identify each gas and electric meter with the number o( the unit which it services.
;l-< Fire extinguishers must be instaUed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is
2A 10 B/C. :\1inimum distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part o( the building is over 75-(eet travel
distance from a fire extinguisher.
AU buildings. other than residential over 5,000 square feet, shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system, designed
to NFPA standards.
Submit plans (or the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction on the system.
Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to construction.
Provide an automatic fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department, prior to installation.
Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shall be required at eurb line.
><
if
I)
[ )
=====================================================================================================================
NOTE: The Ilpplicant must request, in writing, any change in these iJr other requirements.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION,
~
FPg 170 7/:'9
ATIACHMENT H
T1TI'-
.
.
PM 14712 &. DPII 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: 1
HEARING DATE: 1/24195
Pap 17
STANDARD REOUIREMF..NTS
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
1. Submit plans prepared by a Registered Building, Architect or Civil or Structural
Engineer.
2. Submit a complete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a Registered Civil or
Structural Engineer or Architect.
3. Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Forms for non-residential
buildings including a signed compliance statement.
4. Submit calculations and structural drawings, prepared by a Registered Civil Structural
Engineer or Architect.
5. Submit five (5) complete sets of construction plans including:
(a.) Copy of conditions (3).
(b.) Soils report (3).
(c.) Energy Calculations (3).
(d.) Structural calculation (3).
6. Submit a preliminary (soils) report prepared by a person licensed to do so.
7. Submit a single line drawing of the electrical service. Show all equipment, conduit and
wire sizes and types. Show the service ground size and grounding electrode.
8. Submit panel schedule(s) and electrical plans.
9. Submit a plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning system. (Clearly identify the
location and rating of the equipment and the sizes and material of all ducts. registerS and
the location of all fire dampers). Show means of providing mechanical ventilation as
required by the 1991 Uniform Building Code.
10. Submit gas pipe loads, sizing calculations and isometrics.
11. Provide a plot plan showing the locaalDn of tile proposed sewer system.
I n II' III
.
.
PM 14712 & DPll 94-19
AGENDA ITEM: I
HE-ARlNG DATE: I12419S
Page 18
12. Submit isometric plans of the cold and hot water and drain waSte and vent systems.
13. Show compliance with Title 24 for the physically handicapped in the following: Path of
travel to buildini! entrance. rest rooms and all exits shall meet exitinll reauirements.
14. City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's Compensation
Insurance.
15. Assessor's Parcel Number. 281-371-036,47,48
16. Contractor's City license.
17. ContraCtor's State license.
18. Sewer capacity rights from Water Department, 384-5093, Neil Thomsen.
19. School fees from Unified School District, 381-1179.
20. Fire sprinklers required:
Plans for fire sprinklers shall be submitted to Fire Dept. and approved prior to
installation. No building inspections shall be performed beyond "framing and
ventilation" until fire sprinkler plans are approved.
22.
~er: =::;~~k ~ime ;~ an~~im~~el~ ~ : ~ ~eeks. Expeditious ~Ian Check. ~me
IS aDDro___~ t_ t 2 1_ w _ _ __n-s _!!l dmll & Safety for oosslble eJqledl110US
plan check at 384-5071.
Deposit: 53,293.41. Plan Check fees required for development. If project is to be
phased, Plan Check fees are to be paid at each phase.
21.
23.
Five complete sets of plans are required if plans are to be expedited.
II III
DESCRIPTION: CREA TE PARCELS 1 UA 00
~D 008" FROM 4 EX/STING PARCELS
LOCATION: NORTH SIDE HO.t;PITAl/TY
- LANE eo OF /-10 OFF-RAMP
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE NO: .'
, NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the
applicant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the
Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building
Plans.
1. MaDDina
a) A Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required.
b) All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to
Map approval.
c) Reciprocal easements for drainage, access, parking, sewer, and utilities
shall be reserved on the map or by separate instrument.
d) Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to,
building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks,
geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City
Engineer in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-592.
e) If the Parcel Map is in an Assessment District and the assessment has not
been paid off, the subdivider shall submit an apportionment application to
the Real Property section of the Department of Public Works/City Engineer.
Application forms can be obtained form the Real Property Section at (909)
384-5026
'='~ge 1
10/27/94
II II
. STANDARD REOUlREM NTS
~PAR~T OF PUBLIC WORKSI CASE NO._ PU 14712
~
DESCRIPTION: CREA TE PARCELS f ':.c....
tJND "8" FROM 4 EXISTING PARCELS AGENDA ITEM
LOCATION:YORTH SIDE HOSPITALITY HEARING DATE
LAfJ~ eo OF 1-10 OFF-RAJfP PAGE NO:
f) Assessment District Apportionment Fees:
. Parcel Map - $ 1.100.00.
2. A
a) Checking fee for Parcel Map - $ 1,000.00 plus $ 30.00 per parcel.
Oage2
tOi2.7/g4
I lTll
.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE NO. OPII 94-19
~
DESCRIPTION: ~tl Y:5' HOllOA Y SPA
HEAL TH CLUB
LOCATION=;S J10E OF HO.liPITAlITY
L4#E. ~~UE
HEARING DATE
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE.
PAGE NO:
. NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering p/8M ere required. the applicant is
responsible for submitting the Engineering planS direCrJy to the Engineering Division. They
may be submitted prior to submirraJ of Building PIeM.
1. Drainaae and Flood Control
a) The development is located within Zone X (shaded) on the Federal
Insurance Rate Maps and may be subject to sheet overflow to a depth of
less than 1 foot in a 100 year storm; therefore all building pads shall be
raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer.
b) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public
drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
c) Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to
maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit
Requirements. A "Notice of Intent (NO!)" shall be filed with the State Water
Quality Control Board for construction disturbing 5 acres of more of land.
d) An Erosion Control Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
grading plan approval. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due
to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of
construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be
immediately built upon.
2. Gradina
a) If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and
drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading
permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict
accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures". and the
Page 1 1215194
II TT'
STANDARD REOUlREM NTS
CASE NO. DPII 94-19
~
DESCRIPTION: JlALL Y:S- HOllDA Y SP~ HEARING DATE
HEAL TH CLUB AGENDA ITEM
LOCATION: ~S SinE OF HOSPITAJ./I:L- HEARING DATE
LA#E NIl OF HARRIMAN A VENUE PAGE NO: .'
h) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to allow
the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of owner
neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property owner
and shall ensure that , if the property owner or subsequent owner(s) fail to
properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file appropriate
liens against the property in order to accomplish the required landscape
maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of ~OO.OO shall
be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing costs. This
easement and covenant shall be executed by the property owner prior to
plan approval unless otherwise allowed by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer.
3. Utilities
a) Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with
City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including
gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV.
b) Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so it
can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the
area.
c) Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be constructed at
the Developer'S expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures"
and City Standard Drawings.
d) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as
required.
e) Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at
the Developer'S expense as directed by the City Engineer, except overhead
lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be
Page 3 12t.i194
II 11
undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030 (non-
subdivisions) or Section 19.30.110 (subdivisions).
f) Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained
by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and
inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan
designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer
will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan. where
practical.
4. Reauired Enaineerina Permits
a) Grading permit(1f applicable.).
b) On-site improvements construction permit(except buildings - see Planning
and Building Services), including landscaping.
c) Off-site improvements construction permit.
5. A
a) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 4% and 4%.
respectively. of the estimated construction cost- of the off-site
improvements.
b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements(except buildings -
See Planning and Building Services) - 2% and 3%. respectively. of the
estimated construction cost- of the on-site improvements. including
landscaping.
Page 4 1/19195
. II III
STANDARD REOUlREM NTS
QEPABIYENT OJ: PUBLIC WO~ CASE NO. DPII 94-19
~
DESCRIPTION: JJALL Y'S HOLlDA Y SPA- HEARING DATE
HEAL TH ClUB AGENDA ITEM
LOCA TION:jy/S SIDE OF HOSPITIfLlTY HEARING DATE
~O OFHARRIMANAVENUE PAGE NO:
d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount of $ 4.577.00 .
e) Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of j 8.041.00 . Exact amount
shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of application for
Building Permit.
f) The project is located in the Tri-City specific plan area; therefore an
additional traffic mitigation fee in the amount of $ 0.55 per square foot of
building area shall be paid to the Department of Public Works/City
Engineer. subject to credit on a dollar for dollar basis for eligible
infrastructure improvements identified in the Tri-City Specific Plan which
are actually installed as part of the project.
g) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount of ....l1.902.oo .
h) Sewer inspection fee in the amount of ~ 17.82 per connection.
i) Street or easement dedication processing fee in the amount of $ 200.00
per document.
. Estimated constrUCtion cost Is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engi~.
1215194
Page 5
r 'I'n!
.
.
INITIAL STUDY
d
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (TYPE II) 94-19
Project Description/Location: DPII 94-19 is a proposal to construct a 25,000 square foot
single story structure for Bally's Holiday Spa Health Club with accompanying parking and
landscaping on the north side of Hospitality Lane between the eastern and western termini of
Carnegie Drive in the CR-3, Commercial Regional - Tri City/Club land use designation.
Date: October 25, 1994
Applicant:
Rancon Fund V
John Shaw
27720 Jefferson Avenue
Temecula, CA 92590
Prepared by:
Scott D. Donaghe
Assistant Planner
City of San Bernardino
Planning and Building Services
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
ATTACHMENT I
I I II
.
.
DPlI 94-19 1.5..
OClober 25. 1994
Page 2
INITIAL STUDY
Development Pennit (Type In No. 94-19 ..
INTRODUCTION
This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for Development Permit (Type II)
No. 94-19. It contains an evaluation of potential adverse impacts that can occur if the proposed
project is developed.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study
when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not
exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal,
not exempt from CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared.
The following components constitute the Initial Study for Development Permit (Type II) No. 94-
19:
. Project Description
. Site and Area Characteristics
. Environmental Setting
. Environmental Determination
. Environmental Impact Checklist
. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures
. Conclusion
Combined, these components constitute the complete Initial Study for Development Permit (Type
II) No. 94-19.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Development Permit (Type II) No. 94-19 is a proposal to construct a 25,000 square foot building
to serve as Bally's Holiday Spa Health Club.
II 'I'
.
.
DPIl 94-19 I.S.
October 25. 1994
Page 3
SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS
The subject property consists of approximately .81 acres located on the .J1orthern side of
Hospitality Lane, between the eastern and western termini of Carnegie A venue. A vicinity map
is provided as Exhibit A.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site is rectangular in shape and relatively flat. The known envir9nmental
sensitivities associated with the subject property are the possibility of liquefaction, subsidence
and the possible location within a Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
for
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (TYPE II) NO. 94-19
ENVIRONMENT AL DETERMINATION
ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY,
.
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o
The proposed project could have a significant effect on 1he environment, although
there will not be significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described above have been added to the projecl. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared. I
The proposed project MA Y have a significant effect on the environme~q and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
o
~
.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
hf\i~ \-<~"h~hhr O\~
Name and Title
~;*
...u . '3~ . ~4-
Date
II II'
DPIl 94-19 J.S.
October 25. 1994
Pag. 4
.,
I r II
.
.
DPII 94-19 1.5.
October 25. 1994
Page 5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain "Yes" and "Maybe" answers on a separate
attached sheet. "No" answers are explained on this checklist. See
Attachment "A" Preliminary Environmental Description Form, where
necessary.
1.
Earth Resources: will the proposal
result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill)
on slopes of 15% or more based on
information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental
Description Form No. D.(3)?
b. Development and/or grading on a
slope greater than 15% natural
grade based on review of General
Plan HMOD map, which designates
areas of 15% or greater slope in
the city?
c. Development within the Alquist-
Priolo Special Studies Zone as
defined in section 12.0-Geologic
& seismic, Figure 47, of the
City's General Plan?
x
_x_
_x_
d. Modification of any unique geologic
or physical feature based on field
review?
x
e. Development within areas defined
for high potential for water or
wind erosion as identified in
Section 12.0-Geologic & seismic,
Figure 53, of the city's General
Plan?
x
f. Modification of a channel, creek
or river based on review of
USGS Topographic Map (Name)
?
x
.
g. Development within an area
subject to landslides, mudslides,
subsidence or other similar
hazards as identi~led in Section
12.0-Geologic & Seismic,
Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the
city's General Plan?
h. Development within an area
subject to liquefaction as shown
in Section 12.0-Geologic &
Seismic, Figure 48, of the
City's General Plan?
i. Other?
2. Air Resources: will the proposal
result in:
.
Yes
a. Substantial air emissions or an
effect upon ambient air quality
as defined by South Coast Air Quality
Management District, based on
meeting the threshold for significance
in the District's, "CEQA Air Quality
Handbook"?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors based on information
contained in Preliminary
Description Form, No. G.(3)?
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area as identified in
Section 15.a-Wind & Fire, Figure
59, of the City's General Plan?
3. Water Resources: will the proposal
result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces
that cannot be mitigated by
Public Works Standard
Requirements to contain and
convey runoff to approved
storm drain based on review
II II'
DPII 94-19 I.S. .
October 25. 1994
Page 6
No
Maybe
.'
_x_
_x_
x
x
x
x
.
of the proposed site plan?
b. Significant alteration in the
course or flow of flood waters
based on consultation with
Public Works staff?
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality based on
requirements of public Works
to have runoff directed to
approved storm drains?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground water?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards as identified
in the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's Flood
Insurance Rate Map, Community
Panel Number 060281 0020-B,
and Section 16.0-F1ooding,
Figure 62, of the City's General
Plan?
f. Other?
4. Biological Resources: Could the
proposal result in:
a. Development within the Biological
Resources Management Overlay, as
identified in Section 10.0-
Natural Resources, Figure 41,
of the city's General Plan?
b. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants or their
habitat including stands of
trees based on information
contained in the Preliminary
Environmental Description
Form No. B.(1) and verified
.
Yes
II II'
DPlI 94-19 J.S.
October 25. 1994
Page 7
No
Maybe
x
.'
x
x
x
x
x
_x_
.
.
DPII 94-19 I.S..
OClober 25. 1994
Page 8
by on-site survey/evaluation?
2. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals or their
habitat based on information
contained in the Preliminary
Environmental Description
Form No. E.(8) and verified
by site survey/evaluation?
3. Impacts to the wildlife
disbursal or migration corridors?
_x_
_x_
_x_
b. Removal of viable, mature trees
based on site survey/evaluation
and review of the proposed site
plan? (6" or greater trunk
diameter at 4' above the ground)
c. Other?
_x_
_X_
5. Roise: Could the proposal result in:
a. Development of housing, health
care facilities, schools,
libraries, religious facilities
or other noise sensitive uses
in areas where existing or
future noise levels exceed an
Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior and an
Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior as
identified in section 14.0-Noise,
Figures 57 and 58 of the City's
General Plan?
_x_
b. Development of new or expansion
of existing industrial,
commercial or other uses which
generate noise levels above an Ldn of
65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn of
45 dB(A) interior that may affect
areas containing housing, schools,
health care facilities or other
sensitive uses based on
information in the Preliminary
Environmental Description Form
No. G.(l) and evaluation of
surrounding land uses No. C., and
verified by site survey/evaluation?
c. Other?
_x_
_x_
.
6. Land Use: will the proposal result in:
a. A change in the land use as
designated based on the review
of the General Plan Land Use
Plan/Zoning Districts Map?
b. Development within an Airport
District as identified in the
Air Installation Compatible Use
Zone (AICUZ) Report and the Land
Use Zoning District Map?
c. Development within Foothill Fire
Zones A & B, or C as identified
on the Development Code Overlay
Districts Map?
d. Other?
7. Man-Made Hazards: Based on
information contained in Preliminary
Environmental Description Form,
No. G.(l) and G. (2) will the project:
a. Use, store, transport or dispose
of hazardous or toxic materials
(including but not limited to
oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)?
b. Involve the release of
hazardous substances?
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
8. Housing: will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing as verified
by a site survey/evaluation?
b. Create a significant demand for
additional housing based on the
proposed use and evaluation of
project size?
c.
Other?
.
Yes
II 11
DPII 94-19 1.5.
October 25. 1994
Pag~ 9
No
Maybe
-'
x
x
x
x
_x_
_x_
_x_
x
_x_
_x_
X
.
9.
Transportation/Circulation: Could
the proposal, in comparison with the
Circulation Plan as identified in
section 6.0-Circulation of the City's
General Plan and based on the
conclusions of the City Traffic
Engineer and review of the Traffic
Study if one was prepared, result in:
a. A significant increase in traffic
volumes on the roadways or
intersections or an increase that
is significantly greater than the
land use designated on the
General Plan?
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
g. A disjointed pattern of roadway
improvements?
h. Other?
10. Public services: Based on the
responses of the responsible
agencies or departments, will the
proposal impact the following
beyond the capability to provide
adequate levels of service?
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools (i.e., attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
II II'
.
DPlI 94-19 1.5..
October 25. 1994
Pago 10
Yes
No
Maybe
_x_
x
_x_
_x_
_X_
_x_
x
_x_
_x_
_x_
_x_
_x_
.
e. Medical aid?
f. solid waste?
g. Other?
11. utilities: Will the proposal:
a. Based on the responses of the
responsible Agencies,
Departments, or utility company,
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service or require the
construction of new facilities?
1. Natural gas?
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b. Result in a disjointed pattern
of utility extensions based on
review of existing patterns
and proposed extensions.
12. Aesthetics:
a. Could the proposal result in the
obstruction of any significant or
important scenic view based on
evaluation of the view shed
verified by site survey/
evaluation?
b. will the visual impact of the
project create aesthetically
offensive changes in the
existing visual setting
based on a site survey and
evaluation of the proposed
elevations?
c. Other?
.
--I
I,ll:
DPlI 94-19 J.S.
October 25. 1994
Page II
Yes No Kaybe
X
-'
- X
-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
II II'
.
.
DPll 94-19 I.S..
October 25. 1994
Page 12
13. cultural Resources: Could the
proposal result in:
Yes
NO
Maybe
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site by
development within an
archaeological sensitive area
as identified in Section 3.0-
Historical, Figure 8, of the
city's General Plan?
~
_x_
b. Alteration or destruction of
a historical site, structure
or object as listed in the
city's Historic Resources
Reconnaissance survey?
c. Other?
_x_
_X_
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the
following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact
Report shall be prepared. Based on this Initial Study:
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Yes
No
Maybe
_x_
b. Does the project have the
to the disadvantage of long-
term, environmental goals? (A
short-term impact on the
environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
_x_
.
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
.
Yes
-r- 1 FIll
DPlI 94-19 I.S.
OClober 25. 1994
Page 13
No
Maybe
.'
x
_x_
-I [T II'
.
.
.
DPll 94-19 I.S.
October 25. 1994
Page 14
.
B. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(The following responses are numbered to correspond 10 checklist items in the previous section)
1.
Earth Resources
-'
c.
The subject property is located within the Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone as defined in
Section 12.0, Figure 47, of the City's General Plan. An EIR was prepared for the "Tri-City"
Redevelopment project which evaluated the potential constraints to development associated with
geologic structures on-site and in the project area. The potential constraints evaluated were
liquefaction, seismic shaking, subsidence, compressible surficial soils, and artisan spring
development. The EIR concluded that no significant adverse impacts should occur provided that
mitigation measures identified in that document were implemented.
Secondly, the subject property is identified as lying in close proximity to the Lorna Linda Fault.
However, in 1976, the Special Studies Zone designation for the site was removed by the State
and the Lorna Linda fault is presently not considered active. Some State Division of Mines and
Geology publications have not been updated and do, however, still designate the fault as active.
Based on the above mentioned information, it is judged that the EIR for the Tri-City
Redevelopment Project adequately evaluates seismic constraints associated with building on the
site. The mitigations measures identified in that document remain valid for this project.
g.
The subject property is located within an area of potential ground subsidence as identified in
Section 12, Figure 53 of the General Plan. Ground subsidence is a phenomenon that occurs
when there are changes in historical groundwater levels. and a results in a "sinking" of the
ground as the soil settles.
MITIGATION
I. A soils investigation shall be conducted to determine the presence and degree of
subsidence on the subject property. A soils report containing findings and providing
recommendations to ensure proper soil compaction and stability shall be submitted
to the Department of Public Works at the time of grading plan check submittal.
The grading plans shall comply with the recommendations of the report as required
by the Department of Public Works.
h.
The subject property is located within an area of high liquefaction, as identified in Section 12,
Figure 48 of the General Plan. However, the EIR prepared for the Redevelopment Project
identified the potential of liquefaction occurring on-site. The EIR provide mitigation measures
which, if implemented, would reduce the potential impacts to a level of insignificance. These
measures are provided in Appendix "E" of the EIR and are as follows:
II II,
"
.
.
DPlI 94-19 l.S.
October 25. 1994
Page 15 .
.
MITIGATION
n. Potential liquefaction impacts shall be mitigated below a level of insignificance by
either dewatering the site (groundwater), preconsolidating the underlying soils, or
mechanically compacting those soils susceptible to liquefaction. The appropriate
method shall be determined on a site-by-site basis. The City shall require site
specific geotechnical evaluations of each construction site prior to issuing building
permits. These evaluations shall address the potential for liquefaction or other
seismic hazards to occur and identify the appropriate measures to mitigate potential
impacts below a level of significance. These measures must be reviewed and
approved by the City Geologist,
Based on the above mentioned information, it is judged that the EIR for the Tri-City
Redevelopment Project adequately evaluates the potential for liquefaction on this site. The
mitigation measures identified in that document remain valid for this project.
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
a-d. The responses to the checklist questions above indicate the proposed 25,000 square foot
commercial building will not result in any significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to levels
of insignificance. The project does not contribute to ant cumulative impacts beyond the levels
contemplated by the Certified Environmental Impact Report for the City's General Plan, adopted
on June 2, 1989.
.
lZl
>
t'"
t'"
-<""
. :II
tn_
.
="
-
0""
t"'o(
r;-
e= "
i3 > 0
1-<:
.. tn :II
a." ~
i> ~
="
1lIl'"
>2:
t"'''''
o.,Jl"l
=:11
CO)
t""
c:
lZl
i- ,r Ti'
.
.
d
IE' -I
ui fl' 'I .E ~
cli I' :i 1111
IJ;J F'II.~
1;0&, -I 15
I~I . 'I
lill! ...1 il I.I! . ~
EXHIBIT A