The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About33-Public Comments .:~... , Hi Tracie, Tracie, you have forgotten that you use to be one of them. Your harrassment techniques on the internet were very effective on most of the newsgroups and e-groups you were involved in. Just remember, if they can't handle the profanity, they will never be able to deal with the injustice. For all practical purposses, profanity is a coward and operative filter. It is good to flush them out in the open early and expose them. Remember this too. It's not the profanity that your handlers are afraid of. It's the fucking content. When you start promoting proactive citizenship it gets their attention. Directing that activism tword cleaning up corruption gets them worried but their asses are still protected with their corrupt courts. When you state a hemp rope is a legitimate solution to rampant corruption (and you mean it) you are a legitimate threat. The path to wrath, is injustice at intolerable levels and they definitely qualifY there. A hemp rope is a populist solution to corruption if there ever was one. They banned the plant that will hang them. I'm still looking for a publisher for the book. Do you have any ideas on a publisher for Drug War Economics? I need one. If that is not a possibility then we need to develope a way to infect the net with the book, TERRORIST STYLE. On the domestic front. In 1994, I came out against the Drug War for two reasons. I) Personal exposure to Drug War repression against my own family. 2) My research had exposed this war as an expanding domestic covert operation with global agendas. I was fighting for my family and my country when I went after this war in 1994. Part of the divorce process is finding out that the family was not really worth saving and Maureen had sold it out a long time ago. I have a gut feeling this country or the citizens aren't worth saving either. The sheeple deserve to be slaughtered. I found out over the last month that my soon to be x-wife, Maureen, cut a deal with the DOJ and sold out the marrriage when she got hired on as a teacher in San Bernardino. She lied on her application and did not include her drug convictions or the child endangerment conviction in 1992. She was still on probation for the child endangerment conviction until 1996. Failure to disclose this information is a felony if the teacher is subsequently hired on. The DOJ does the background investigations of teachers in this state. The DOJ did not pass this information on to Pacific High School, the School Board or file charges against her. I wonder how many others they have placed in the schools, government and the medical profession. With over thirty million Drug War Felons in this country, I would not be surprised ifhalfthe government was in that boat. The DOJ now believes that they own her. Not even close, Maureen willleam how to use this relationship with the DOJ to acquire real access to power in America. She is probably being trained for it as we speak. She is ambitious, smart, good looking, dangerous and has no scruples. No wonder I was attracted to her. That's how things really work in America. The DOJ does the background investigations for teachers in the state. The DOJ also buries the criminal records of their rats, which makes them far more effective and cooperative as an intelligence asset for the government. They turned Maureen and now she is an asset for the fascists. I talked to Shirley, an investigator and a possible asset as well about a plan for exposing this covert operation in the book. She was the only one I mentioned this plan to. I have not heard from Maureen since discussing this plan with Shirley and found out she has moved out ofthe area. Shirley cannot be trusted either. This looks like documentation for Drug War Economics: The Machine Behind the Madness. Sincerely, Jay Lindberg #33 10-/0 - 00 . . ..- ..~, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA MINUTE ORDER CASE NO: SBFSS46853 DATE: 07/28/00 CASE TITLE: MAUREEN LINDBERG -N- MARION JAY LINDBERG ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPT: S8 07/28/00 TIME: 8:30 Motion re: WITHDRAW AS ATTY OF RECORD filed by Respondent MARION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINT TYPE: DM JUDGE BRIAN S MCCARVILLE presiding. Clerk: Roxane Sayre-Johnson. Bailiff: Louise Jenks Not repo.rted APPEARANCES: Attorney A. Carlisle present for respondent. Respondent MARION JAY LINDBERG present HEARINGS: Current hearing continued to 07/31/00 at 8:30 in Department S8. Action - Complete === MINUTE ORDER END . .. I J COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA MINUTE ORDER CASE NO: SBFSS46853 DATE: 07/31/00 CASH TITLE: MAUREEN LINDBERG -N- MARION JAY LINDBERG ------------------------------------------~-----------------~--------- DEPT: S8 07/31/00 TIME: 8:30 Family Law Mandatory Settlement Conference ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINT TYPE: DM JUDGE PHILLIP M MORRIS presiding. Clerk: Roxane Sayre-Johnson Bailiff: Louise Jenks Reporte~: Jeanne Chrystie APPEARANCES: Attorney R. Nierman present for petitioner. Respondent MARION JAY LINDBERG present PROCEEDINGS: RESPONDENT MOTION TO CONTINUE MATTER TO HIRE ATTORNEY IS GRANTED. HEARINGS: Current hearing continued to 10/17/00 at 8:30 in Department S8. Court Trial set for 12/18/00 at 8:30 in Department S8. Trial estimate is one day Action - Complete === MINUTE ORDER END tile:///q/WINDOWSlDesktop/Reterence AJicles/Dividc and conquer.htm I', -, (Excerpted from "Censored '97: The News that Didn't Make the News" by Peter Phillips (Sonoma State University) & Project Censored). DIVIDE AND CONQUER New_ York Ronald Duchin, senior vice-president ofPR spy firm Mongoven, Biscoe, and Duchin is a graduate of the U.S. Army War College who worked as a special assistant to the secretary of defense and director of public affairs for the Veterans of Foreign Wars before becoming a flack. Activists, he explained, fall into four categories: radicals, opportunists, idealists and realists. He follows a three-step strategy to neutralize them: I) isolate the radicals; 2) "cultivate" the idealists and "educate" them into becoming realists; then 3) co-opt the realists into agreeing with industry. According to Duchin, radical activists "want to change the system; have underlying socio/political motives [and] see multinational corporations as inherently evil...These organizations do not trust the...federal, state and local governments to protect them and to safeguard the environment. They believe, rather, that individuals and local groups should have direct power over industry... I would categorize their principal aims right now as social justice and political empowerment." Idealists are also "hard to deal with." They "want a perfect world and find it easy to brand any product or practice which can be shown to mark that perfection as evil. Because of their intrinsic altruism, however, and because they have nothing perceptible to be gained by holding their position, they are easily believed by both the media and the public, and sometimes even politicians." However, idealists "have a vulnerable point. If they can be shown that their position in opposition to an industry or its products causes harm to others and cannot be ethically justified, they are forced to change their position...Thus, while a realist must be negotiated with, a idealist must be educated. Generally this education process requires great sensitivity and understanding on the part of the educator." Opportunists and realists, says Duchin, are easier to manipulate. Opportunists engage in activism seeking "visibility, power, followers, and perhaps, even employment...The key to dealing with [them] is to provide them with at least the perception of a partial victory." And realists are able to "live with trade-offs; willing to work within the system; not interested in radical change; pragmatic. [They] should always receive the highest priority in any strategy dealing with a public policy issue...Ifyour industry can successfully bring about these relationships, the credibility of the radicals will be lost and opportunists can be counted on to share in the final policy solution," 101' I 10/11/009:04 AM . .. . .. ~ .. .. ~ o J: ~ ~ 1II.c ~ I- W c .. o 0 Q LL. ...I